HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 04/08/2014 - UPDATE OF OLD TOWN FORT COLLINS HISTORIC DISTRICTDATE:
STAFF:
April 8, 2014
Josh Weinberg, City Planner
Ted Shepard, Chief Planner
WORK SESSION ITEM
City Council
SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION
Update of Old Town Fort Collins Historic District Design Standards and Downtown River District (R-D-R Zone)
Design Standards and Guidelines.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this item is to review a proposed update to the Old Town Fort Collins Historic District (Old Town
District) Design Standards and Downtown River District (R-D-R Zone) Design Standards and Guidelines. These
two projects, while separate, are brought forward in tandem due to a similar set of design issues and geographical
proximity. Both areas also contain portions of the National Register Old Town Historic District. The Old Town
Design Standards, originally adopted in 1981, require substantial revisions to address current historic
preservation practices and development concerns related to infill and redevelopment within and around the Old
Town District. The update to the design standards will define and illustrate characteristics for compatible future
development within the Old Town District and in the adjacent area; and a means for incorporating modern
sustainable building practices into historic preservation projects. The design standards for the R-D-R Zone District
were originally adopted with City Plan in 1997. Several developments have been brought forward, highlighting
the need to take additional steps to preserve the district's distinctive character as the commercial and industrial
core of our city. The proposed design standards and guidelines for this zone have been created to better address
neighborhood, site and building attributes in order to preserve the unique character of the area.
GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED
1. Does Council have recommendations for improving the illustrations, graphic layout or content of either
document?
2. Does Council have any other ideas on how best to preserve the distinctive character of the R-D-R zone
district as the area continues to attract both new development and redevelopment of existing properties?
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
In early 2013, Historic Preservation staff received a grant from the State Historical Fund to partially fund an
update to the design standards document for Fort Collins' Old Town Historic Landmark District (Old Town
District). Winter & Co. of Boulder, CO was chosen in May of 2013 as the project consultant. Due to the similarity
in schedules, outreach processes, and geographic proximity, Winter & Co. was also retained as project
consultants for the River Downtown Redevelopment (R-D-R Zone District) Design Guidelines project, to maximize
resources and efficiencies.
Old Town Fort Collins Historic District Design Standards
Historic Old Town Fort Collins is renowned as a highly successful example of how historic preservation, economic
development and community planning have combined to create a dynamic sense of place essential to the
community’s quality of life. In 2006, for example, Money Magazine named Fort Collins the best place to live in the
United States, and cited Old Town as Fort Collins’ integral social and economic resource. Today, Historic Old
Town both stands as a link to the past, while serving as an engine for economic development for the community
at large.
April 8, 2014 Page 2
Most of the structures within the Old Town District were built between 1878 and the early 1900s. The hub of Fort
Collins’ commerce and industry, the District’s buildings underwent numerous alterations and modernizations,
notably in the 1960s and the early 1970s. Revitalization began in the late 1970s with local, state, and national
register designation, and a community wide commitment to preservation. Throughout the 1980s, 1990s, and
2000s, nearly every historic building within the District was restored and/or rehabilitated. Highlighting these
“success stories” is one of the project goals.
This document utilized an innovative and creative format to be user friendly. “Before and after" examples are
used to illustrate the document and demonstrate the functionality of the preservation standards. The format
makes use of charts and diagrams that help users plan projects efficiently and quickly determine which sections
of the document apply. The document also incorporates computer-generated models of alternative approaches
for various design topics, including additions, rehabilitation and new construction. Additionally, information on
sustainability and the use of substitute materials are interwoven through the document.
River Downtown Redevelopment (R-D-R) Zone District Design Standards and Guidelines
The R-D-R zone district includes the original Fort Collins town site and the historic commercial and industrial core.
It is characterized by a wide variety of buildings that have served a multitude of uses over the decades.
Ranchway Feeds, Harmony Mill, Feeders Supply and the former electrical generating plant (now the CSU
Powerhouse) are all unique buildings that reflect our history as the region’s center of commerce. The primary
attribute of the area, the Poudre River, historically attracted water-powered agricultural-related industry and is
now the community’s premier natural feature. A continuous change with railroad lines, two state highways, and
the general expansion of the downtown core has resulted in range of architectural styles that are the essence of
today’s mixed character and charm.
The proposed new design standards and guidelines are specifically intended to maintain this ag-industrial
character with the compatibility of redevelopment. The existing standards that govern the relationship with the
Poudre River will be retained as these standards have been found to be effective at protecting the natural riparian
features while allowing development to occur in a sensitive fashion. Other existing standards that are not
duplicative will be retained. All applicable design standards will be merged and organized into a new set of Land
Use Code standards specific to the R-D-R zone.
The proposed new standards and guidelines build upon previous efforts that address this area, particularly the
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Plan (2000) and the Downtown River District Streetscape
Improvements Project (2008). These two efforts formed the basis of the public improvements along Linden Street
that were completed in March 2012. The new standards call for new development to complement these public
improvements.
The proposed new standards and guidelines are also in alignment with the proposed new design for a fully-
improved Willow Street. The Engineering Department is currently overseeing a design project for Willow Street
between North College Avenue and Linden Street and the projects have been in close coordination.
The project has also closely coordinated with the Poudre River Downtown Project being led by the Parks and
Natural Resources Departments. That project is exploring potential improvements within the immediate River
corridor. Since the proposed standards and guidelines retain all existing standards related to the Poudre River,
and since the River project addresses ecosystem, stormwater / floodplain management and recreation, the two
projects are not in conflict.
It is noteworthy that this project is not a land use plan. It is not an up-zoning or down-zoning, and there no
changes to maximum allowable height standards. The proposed standards and guidelines address how building
height can be addressed in redevelopment projects based on the context of the site and proximity to historic
structures. The fundamental approach is context-based site analysis and sensitive design that is complementary
to the area’s character.
The proposed standards and guidelines acknowledge that this area has an ag-industrial character that is not as
refined as the more ornate portion of the Old Town Historic District across Jefferson Street, with its retail and
entertainment activity and architectural embellishments. In contrast, the R-D-R zone features commercial and
April 8, 2014 Page 3
industrial uses where building forms are simpler and less detailed. Industrial activities, such as manufacturing
and outside storage and truck docks, are part of the area’s character. The somewhat rough-hewn character can
be incorporated into more active streets to achieve a walkable and interesting district that is worth exploring.
In summary, the draft standards and guidelines implement the action plan from City Plan Update - 2011 in order
to respect the ag-industrial character of the area. They enhance, clarify and update the existing standards that
govern the R-D-R zone district. The new standards will be inserted directly into the Land Use Code for maximum
effectiveness. Explanatory text, graphics, and illustrations will be available in an accompanying document for the
benefit of land owners, architects and developers in order to provide more detail and remove ambiguity. Overall,
the project is anticipated to result in an improved development review process for all interested parties.
Public Engagement
Boards and Commission Outreach:
- Work Sessions with Landmark Preservation Commission (June 26, October 23, and December 11, 2013)
- Work Session with Planning and Zoning Board (January 3, 2014)
- Downtown Development Authority (February 13, 2014)
- Parking Advisory Board (March 10, 2014)
- Natural Resources Advisory Board (March 19, 2014)
Citizen Outreach:
- Tour of subject areas with consultant and stakeholder group (June 26, 2013)
- Poudre River Project Open House, Lincoln Center (June 26, 2013)
- Public Workshops (October 3 and November 13, 2013)
- Website: <http://www.fcgov.com/historicpreservation/otrd-design-standards-and-guidelines.php> (October,
2013)
- Poster and table at joint Planning and Transportation open house, Museum and Discovery Science Center
(February 20, 2014)
- Correspondence with representatives of Save the Poudre and Protect Our Old Town Homes (Ongoing)
Next Steps
Based on Council's recommendations at the April 8 Work Session, revisions will be made and presented to the
community through the following outreach plan prior to returning to Council on June 3:
Citizen Outreach:
- Present findings and invite comments at public workshop (April 2014)
- Present final drafts on website and provide opportunity for community input (April 2014)
- Downtown Business Association Presentation (May 2014)
Boards and Commission Outreach:
- Planning and Zoning Board Hearing (May 2014)
- Landmark Preservation Commission Hearing (May 2014)
April 8, 2014 Page 4
ATTACHMENTS
1. River District Map (PDF)
2. Old Town Historic District Map (PDF)
3. Public Engagement Plan (PDF)
4. River District Design Standards and Guidelines (PDF)
5. Old Town Historic District Design Standards (PDF)
6. Old Town Historic District Design Standards (PDF)
7. Triple Bottom Line Analysis (PDF)
8. Powerpoint presentation (PDF)
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 2
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY
PROJECT TITLE: OLD TOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS/RIVER DISTRICT DESIGN
GUIDELINES
OVERALL PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT LEVEL: Inform and Involve
BOTTOM LINE QUESTION: Are there suggestions for improving the content, design, and/or direction of
either project?
KEY STAKEHOLDERS: Area property owners, business owners, residents, State Historical Fund (Old Town
Historic District), Parking Advisory Board (River District), Landmark Preservation Commission, Planning and
Zoning Board, Downtown Development Authority, Downtown Business Association, Save the Poudre,
Natural Resources Advisory Board, Protect Our Old Town Homes (POOTH), and City Council.
TIMELINE: September 2013 – June 2014
Phase 1: Involve
Timeframe: June 2013 – November 2013
Key Messages: Pre-development of draft standards/guidelines - Presentation of current gaps in each
and overview of proposed changes with areas of focus.
Tools and Techniques:
Coordination with consultant and State Historical Fund project manager (June 18)
Tour of subject areas with stakeholder group (June 26, 2013)
Poudre River Project Open House, Lincoln Center (June 26, 2013)
Work Session with Landmark Preservation Commission (June 26)
Public workshop (October 3)
PHASE 2: Inform
Timeframe: October 2013 – April 2014
Key Messages: Present draft design guideline/standards documents, invite suggestions and feedback.
Tools and Techniques:
Website: http://www.fcgov.com/historicpreservation/otrd-design-standards-and-guidelines.php
Work Sessions with the Landmark Preservation Commission (October 23 and December 11, 2013)
Public workshop (November 13, 2013)
Work Session with Planning and Zoning Board (January 3, 2014)
Presentation to the Downtown Development Authority (February 13, 2014)
Poster and table at joint Planning and Transportation open house, Museum and Discovery Science
Center (February 20, 2014)
Presentation to Parking Advisory Board regarding proposed LUC changes for parking in R-D-R
Zone District (March 10, 2014)
Presentation to Natural Resources Advisory Board (March 19, 2014)
Correspondence with representatives of Save the Poudre and Protect Our Old Town Homes
(Ongoing)
ATTACHMENT 3
PHASE 3: Inform
Timeframe: April 2014 – June 2014
Key Messages: Present final draft design guideline/standards documents, request board and commission
recommendations prior to June 3 adoption hearing with City Council
Tools and Techniques:
Present findings and invite comments at public workshop, April 2014
Present final drafts on website and provide opportunity for community input, April 2014
Downtown Business Association Board Meeting, April 9, 2014
Planning and Zoning Board Hearing, May 2014
Landmark Preservation Commission Hearing, May 2014
FORT COLLINS RIVER DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES
JANUARY 27, 2014
ATTACHMENT 4
DRAFT II
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES 1
Overview 3
Policy Base for the Design Guidelines 6
Vision For the River District 7
I UNDERSTANDING THE CONTEXT 9
Evolution and Change 11
II HOW TO USE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES 17
How the Guidelines are Organized 19
Understanding the Content of a Design Guideline 20
III KEY PRINCIPLES FOR DESIGN 23
Key Principles for Design 25
IV NEIGHBORHOOD LEVEL DESIGN 27
Neighborhood Level Design Overview 29
Connectivity 30
Views 33
Riverfront Relationship 34
V SITE DESIGN GUIDELINES 35
Overview to the Site Design Guidelines 37
Open Space Amenities 38
Street Edge 42
Parking Edge 43
Fencing and Site Walls 44
Service Area 45
VI BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES 47
Building Design Guidelines 49
Mass and Scale 50
Pedestrian-Friendly Edge 53
Solid-to-Void 55
Roofs 56
Building Materials 57
Building Features 60
Structured Parking 64
Miscellaneous 65
DRAFT II
CREDITS - FORTHCOMING
Prepared by:
Winter & Company
1265 Yellow Pine Avenue
Boulder, Colorado 803034
303.440.8445
www.winterandcompany.net
INTRODUCTION TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Introduction to the Design Guidelines 3
The River District is important to the history of Fort
Collins and offers a significant opportunity for future
redevelopment. Although it is the site of the original
fort that grew into the present day city, only a few
significant reminders of the past remain. These historic
resources help inform the community vision for a River
District that extends the vibrancy of downtown while
also hosting a diverse mix of uses that honor the area’s
agricultural-industrial past. The vision is also informed
by the community’s desire to highlight and respect the
Poudre River, which runs along the district’s northern
boundary.
This document provides guidelines that promote the
community’s vision for the River District through
compatible new construction and redevelopment. It
also assists with interpretation of the special zoning
standards that apply to the district. The goal is to
support investment that builds a strong, pedestrian-
oriented urban fabric and encourage creative design
that is compatible with the historic context.
Historic resources, including the 102 year old Northern Colorado Feeders Supply Building,
inform the community vision for a diverse mix of uses that honor the River District’s agricul-
tural-industrial past.
Zoning Standards for the River District
The Fort Collins Land Use Code sets forth the
R-D-R zone district to implement special develop-
ment standards for the River District. The guide-
lines in this document assist with interpretation of
R-D-R zone district standards.
See “Fort Collins Land Use Code” on page 6
for more information.
OVERVIEW
42014 Introduction to the Design Guidelines River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
LOCATION
The River District is part of the City’s Poudre River
Corridor. It also is described as a sub-district of down-
town and as the “Historic and Cultural Core Segment”
of the Poudre River Corridor. The entire Corridor also
is part of a “national river corridor,” which Congress
designated in 1996 for the Cache La Poudre River to
recognize its critical historical value in the westward
expansion of the U.S.
The River District includes the area just northeast of
the city’s Old Town Historic District including Jeffer-
son, Linden, and Willow Streets and Lincoln Avenue.
Jefferson Street is also State Highway 14. Linden Street
is the primary connection linking the River District to
the Old Town (Local) Historic District to the south
and northward to surrounding neighborhoods and
employment areas. Linden Street also provides one of
the main connections over the Poudre River and is one
of the most convenient access points to the Poudre
River Trail. Willow Street is a locally well-known route
to connect from College Avenue (US287) through the
River District to Lincoln.
A portion of the River District, between Jefferson
Street and Willow Street, also is part of the Old Fort
Collins National Register Historic District.
APPLICATION OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The design guidelines in this document apply to new
construction projects and additions to existing buildings
within the boundaries of the River District. Property
owners, architects, developers and the general public
should refer to the guidelines to learn about design in
the River District and strategies for compatible new
construction. The design guidelines do not address
improvements to historic buildings; these are instead
addressed in the separate Old Town Historic District
Guidelines. Owners of historic properties should
use those guidelines for improvements to buildings
designated, or eligible to be designated as local historic
landmarks. A portion of the River District is located
within the Old Town National Register Historic Dis-
trict. In some cases, special design guidelines apply to
new construction in this area. See Chapter 1 for more
information.
The design guidelines also do not generally apply to
public realm (streets, sidewalks and parks) improve-
ments, which are addressed in a separate Streetscape
Plan.
HISTORIC RESOURCES AND THEIR
RELATIONSHIP TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES
Several properties in the River District have historic
significance, and may be identified as such in a variety
of ways: A property may be a locally designated land-
mark, or it may be listed as a contributor to the Old
Town (Local) Historic District. It also may have been
determined to be individually eligible for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places, or it may have
been rated as a “contributor” to a potential historic
district. For each of these four types of identification,
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Introduction to the Design Guidelines 5
Map Key
National Register District
Old Town Historic District
River District
Properties determined to be ELIGIBLE for listing as
a local landmark
These are generally properties that have been deter-
mined in a formal survey to be eligible individually to
the National Register, or are already so listed. For
these properties, the city’s development review pro-
cess will take impacts on the historic significance into
consideration.
Contributor to a potential National Register district
or a local historic district.
The city conducted an inventory of cultural resources
in the Old Fort Site area in 2002. The inventory
identified several properties that could be contribu-
tors to a National Register District, but overall did
not find a sufficient concentration of these resources
to justify designating a district. For those properties,
owners may still seek to apply best practices in historic
preservation, and may ELECT to use the preservation
guidelines for Old Town.
Preservation guidelines
Special guidelines for preservation of historic resources
exist for the Old Town (Local) Historic District. These
should be used when considering improvements af-
fecting historic properties, including all of the types of
resources listed above.
North
NTS
62014 Introduction to the Design Guidelines River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
POLICY BASE FOR THE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The River District Design Guidelines reflect the City’s
goal to enhance its image while promoting sustain-
ability and economic development. The policy base for
the Design Guidelines is provided in several key policy
documents including the City Plan comprehensive
plan, Land Use Code and River District Streetscape
Improvements Project.
CITY PLAN
In February 2011, the City of Fort Collins published an
update to its City Plan, a comprehensive plan for the
City which illustrates a vision of Fort Collins for the
next twenty-five years and beyond.
City Plan policies and principles seek to improve access
to the River District and establish gateways to draw
attention and convey the character of the district. City
plan principles and policies for historic preservation
also help provide a policy base for the Design Guide-
lines, including:
Principle LIV16: “The quality of life in Fort Collins will be en-
hanced by the preservation of historic resources and inclusion
of heritage in the daily life and development of the community.”
Policy LIV 16.6 - Integrate Historic Structures “Explore oppor-
tunities to incorporate existing structures of historic value into
new development and redevelopment activities.”
FORT COLLINS LAND USE CODE
The Land Use Code sets forth the regulations that
shape development throughout Fort Collins. Division
4.17 of the Land Use Code establishes the River
Downtown Redevelopment District (R-D-R) to imple-
ment special zoning standards for the River District.
In addition to special regulations, the Code’s intent
statement for the R-D-R zone district helps establish a
policy base for the Design Guidelines:
“The River Downtown Redevelopment District is intended
to reestablish the linkage between Old Town and the River
through redevelopment in the Cache la Poudre River cor-
ridor. This District offers opportunities for more intensive
redevelopment of housing, businesses and workplaces to
complement Downtown.
Improvements should highlight the historic origin of Fort
Collins and the unique relationship of the waterway and
railways to the urban environment as well as expand cul-
tural opportunities in the Downtown area. Any significant
redevelopment should be designed as part of a master
plan for the applicable group of contiguous properties.
Redevelopment will extend the positive characteristics
of Downtown such as the pattern of blocks, pedestrian-
oriented street fronts and lively outdoor spaces.”
The River District Design Guidelines build on this in-
tent statement and the specific design topics addressed
in the R-D-R zone district to help ensure compatible
design that is consistent with the vision for the River
District. The Design Guidelines include cross refer-
ences to Code standards when applicable.
Note that industrial uses continues to be welcomed.
RIVER DISTRICT STREETSCAPE
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Introduction to the Design Guidelines 7
The vision for the River District is that it will be an
active place, where the river, industry, art and history
come together to provide a vibrant complement to Old
Town Fort Collins. A mix of uses, including housing,
commercial and industrial activities enjoy the amenities
of the river and its preserved natural areas. Modern
housing, restaurants, shops and office buildings join
with established industrial enterprises to reflect the
District’s historic past and celebrate its future. Every-
one enjoys the recreational opportunities found there.
In the future, the River District connects Old Town
with the Poudre River, and celebrates its agricultural
and industrial architecture and the rich history of the
area. It does so in creative ways that express a look
to the future, while respecting the past. The area will
be known for new, well-designed infill buildings and
landscapes that offer opportunities for business and
industry and also facilitate relaxation, exposure to
Some recently constructed local brewery buildings provide cultural activities and civic interaction.
design inspiration for new buildings that reflect the River
District’s agricultural-industrial heritage.
VISION FOR THE RIVER DISTRICT
82014 Introduction to the Design Guidelines River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
1
UNDERSTANDING THE CONTEXT
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Understanding the Context 11
EVOLUTION AND CHANGE
Understanding the context for design in the River Dis-
trict is essential in planning any improvement project in
the area. While substantial new development is envi-
sioned, there are references from the past that should
inspire design. This section introduces some aspects of
the context to consider.
The core of the River District near Linden and Willow
Streets is significant in its role in the settlement of the
city of Fort Collins. The original “Fort Collins” military
post was established there in 1864 and consisted of
a parade ground, officer’s quarters & barracks, store-
houses and other buildings. The Army relinquished
ownership in 1872 and fort structures were gradually
removed one by one until 1942 when the last build-
ing for the Fort was demolished. Some archaeological
resources may exist from this era.
LATER DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA
Uses that followed the military post included residen-
tial, flour milling, retailing, farming, ranching, lodging,
animal feed production and, much later, the city dump.
New buildings were erected over several decades, and
by the early twentieth century, the area had a distinct
urban form, with commercial buildings concentrated
near the intersection of Jefferson and Linden Streets,
and a mix of residential and industrial uses extending
from Jefferson north to the river.
A diverse range of building types existed, reflecting
the mix of uses and the changing economy in the area.
Commercial and industrial buildings took a variety of
forms: Some were massive masonry or frame struc-
tures, rising to four and five stories. Others were only
one or two stories in height, but sprawled across large
parcels. Residential structures were typically single
family wood frame structures, although some masonry
ones are documented to have existed.
THE INFLUENCE OF THE RAILROAD
Railroads significantly shaped the character of the area.
An initial rail line, the Greeley, Salt Lake and Pacific
Railroad (GSL&P), was established in the area in 1881-
83. It followed a raceway that was constructed to
provide power for mills in the area (This followed what
became Willow Street.) Industrial uses then located
along the rail line. A more dramatic change occurred
in 1910-11, when the Union Pacific constructed a rail
line closer to Jefferson. This caused the demolition of
several buildings and the construction of new ones,
such as the freight depot and passenger depot. It also
further separated the Old Town commercial district
from the river.
CHANGES IN THE RIVER ITSELF
One significant topographical change included the
channelization of the river between Linden Street
and Lincoln Avenue. Historically, the Poudre River
channel in the section between Linden Street and
Lincoln Avenue followed a large meander to the east
of its current alignment. (The ox-bow is still visible in
some aerial photos.) During the 1960s, the oxbow was
122014 Understanding the Context River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
MAPPING CHANGES IN THE AREA
As a part of a cultural resource report prepared
in 2002 for the city by Jason Marmor of Entranco, a
series of maps were produced that draw upon a variety
of historic data sources to chart the progression of
development in the area. A few of the maps from that
report are reproduced here. The ones selected begin
with development that occurred after the original
fort closed and land became available for private use.
They provide insights into the patterns of development
in the area, and to the ways in which various trends
shaped its urban form.
A general review of these maps demonstrates some
key points:
› Evolution and change are a part of the heritage
of the River District. This is reflected in the
guidelines that appear later in this document.
› A mix of uses has always been a part of the
dynamics of the area, with percentages within
the mix of different uses changing over time.
A continuing mix of uses is anticipated in city
policies for the River District and in the design
guidelines.
› A diversity of building forms and types is also a
part of the River District’s heritage. These range
from small wood frame single-family residences
to massive masonry mill buildings. This diversity
of form and materials is also promoted in the
guidelines.
› The river and the railroads were major influ-
ences in the area’s development patterns. Some
evidence of these influences remain today, albeit
sometimes in subtle ways. These also inform
some of the design principles and guidelines
that appear in this document. Retaining refer-
ences to some of these features in landscape
and building orientation is also put forth in the
guidelines.
MAP KEY
This key applies to the maps shown on the following
three pages.
An early view of the River District documents the location
of the Raceway along Willow Street and the position of the
GSL&P rail line.
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Understanding the Context 13
RIVER DISTRICT CONTEXT 1891
This map illustrates the overall number of buildings and the patterns of land uses
that emerged after the closure of the fort of Fort Collins. Of note:
› The arc of the main channel of Cache la Poudre River is shown.
› A raceway, used for water power, runs along Willow Street.
› The GSL&P railway line follows along the raceway in the center of the
map.
› A clustering of industrial buildings appears in Block 9 along Lincoln Av-
enue, including the Harmony Mill (built c. 1886-87), where the raceway
joins the channel of the river.
› Commercial development is focused at the intersection of Linden and
Jefferson.
› Residences lie between the commercial area and the raceway. (Note
that the Sanborn maps, upon which this information is based, did not
extend beyond Willow Street at this period, and therefore no buildings
are shown in that area.)
RIVER DISTRICT CONTEXT 1909
This map illustrates the continued expansion of development in the area. Of
note:
› A second cluster of industrial uses appears near Spruce and Willow
Streets, including the Poudre Valley Supply Company feed mill.
› Some buildings are aligned parallel to the tracks, and thus they reflect the
location of this feature.
› Residential development north of Willow is now documented.
› The Denver & Interurban Railroad streetcar line runs along Linden Street.
› More commercial buildings appear along both sides of Jefferson Street.
142014 Understanding the Context River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
RIVER DISTRICT CONTEXT 1917
This map dramatically documents the effect that the construction of the Union
& Pacific railroad (1910-11) had on the built environment of the area. Many
buildings were removed to make room for it. Of note:
› Most industrial, and residential buildings have been removed from Blocks
6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.
› A new main railroad track appears, just east of Jefferson Street.
› A new rail siding appears, running parallel to Jefferson Street, and
approximately midway between Jefferson and Willow Streets. (This
survives as a partial view corridor today.)
› Portions of Pine and all of Spruce Street are vacated for the new rail line.
› The Union Pacific passenger and freight depots stand on Jefferson and
Linden Streets, respectively.
› More industrial facilities are located within the rail corridor.
› Residential buildings have diminished in number.
RIVER DISTRICT CONTEXT 1948
This map documents the continuing expansion of industrial uses. Of note:
› The raceway has disappeared.
› New commercial uses appear, including the Trostel lumber yard on the
north side of Linden Street 400 Linden Street (Block 1).
› The municipal power plant, (erected in 1935-36) appears along North
College Avenue.
› The Libby, McNeil & Libby pickle plant at 355 Linden Street was greatly
expanded by 1948, and contained a total of 36 cylindrical pickling vats.
This demonstrates the variety of building forms that have appeared over
the years.
› Residential use remains relatively unchanged.
› The course of the Cache la Poudre River has been modified.
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Understanding the Context 15
RIVER DISTRICT CONTEXT 1963
This map documents the enlargement of the former Lindell Mills, after its
acquisition by Ranch-Way Feeds and conversion to a livestock feed mill and
packaging plant. Of note:
› The pickling plant on Linden Street is gone.
› The adjacent grain elevator has been converted to commercial use as a
livestock feed store.
› Another new commercial venture is the El Burrito café on Linden Street
near Willow, started in 1960.
› Industrial uses have expanded.
› The Cache La Poudre River has been further straightened.
RIVER DISTRICT CONTEXT 2002
This map illustrates the continuing mix of uses in the area, and the introduction
of new public parks and community facilities, as the river is now recognized as
an amenity. Of note:
› Several houses razed on Block 2
› The erection of new lumber warehouses and Kiefer Concrete facilities
between Lincoln Avenue and Linden Streets
› Construction of a large commercial building on Lot 10 in Block 2
› The United Way building on Pine Street, indicating the introduction of
social services into the area
› The former GSL&P railroad tracks along Willow Street were removed by
2002, leaving only the Union Pacific mainline and a spur serving Ranch-
Way Feeds.
› Old Fort Collins Heritage Park appears on the site of the old city dump.
› Jefferson Street Park is located southeast of the former UP passenger
depot.
162014 Understanding the Context River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
2
HOW TO USE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 How to Use the Design Guidelines 19
The design guidelines are organized into a series of
chapters that reflect a progression in scale of consider-
ing different contexts and design variables. They begin
with topics that address how a project relates to its
larger neighborhood and continue with topics that
focus on site design. They then continue with guidance
for building design.
NEIGHBORHOOD LEVEL
Design guidelines in this category focus on ways in
which individual projects work together to create a
vital, functioning neighborhood. Design in the public
realm and consideration of how an individual property
relates positively to others in the vicinity are important
considerations.
SITE LEVEL
Design guidelines in this category focus on how im-
provements on an individual property are organized,
including the placement and orientation of buildings,
the location of service areas and landscaping. Some of
these guidelines focus on maintaining a sense of con-
tinuity with the neighborhood, while others address
making the best use of the property in terms of creat-
ing a sense of place and enhancing function for users.
HOW THE GUIDELINES ARE ORGANIZED
BUILDING LEVEL
Design guidelines in this category address architectural
character, scale, materials and details, with a focus on
fitting with the design traditions of the River District,
while also encouraging new, creative approaches.
202014 How to Use the Design Guidelines River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
UNDERSTANDING THE CONTENT OF A DESIGN GUIDELINE
TERMS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE
When applying design guidelines, the city balances a
combination of design objectives that appear through-
out the document, in the interest of helping to achieve
the most appropriate design for each project. Because
of this, and the fact that the design guidelines are
also written to serve an educational role as well as a
regulatory one, the language sometimes appears more
conversational than that in zoning and development
standards. To clarify how some terms are used, these
definitions shall apply:
Guideline
In this document the term “guideline” is a criterion
with which the city will require compliance when it is
found applicable to the specific improvement project.
In this sense it is a standard, albeit one that is subject
to some interpretation when determining compliance.
Shall
Where the term “shall” is used, compliance is specifi-
cally required, when the statement is applicable to the
proposed work.
Should
The term “should” is frequently used in the guidelines.
This indicates that compliance is expected, except in
conditions in which the city finds that the guideline is
not applicable, or that an alternative means of meeting
the intent of the guideline is acceptable.
Will Be Considered
The phrase “will be considered” appears in some
guidelines text. This indicates that the city has the
discretion to determine if the action being discussed
is appropriate. This decision is made on a case-by-case
basis, using the information specifically related to the
project and its context.
Feasible
“Feasible” means capable of being accomplished in a
successful manner within a reasonable period of time,
taking into account economic, environmental, legal,
social, and technological factors. This term is used
in some guidelines in this document to indicate that,
while meeting the particular guideline in full is usually
required, there may be instances in a specific applica-
tion in which it may not be possible to do so. In all
cases, the city shall make the determination of what is
feasible.
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 How to Use the Design Guidelines 21
Sidebars
These provide additional infor-
mation that will be helpful in
understanding the guideline. In
some cases a sidebar includes links
that direct the user to additional
material; this may be technical
information about a rehabilitation
procedure or other helpful infor-
mation.
Appropriate and
Inappropriate Solutions
In many cases, images and dia-
grams in the historic preservation
guidelines are marked to indicate
whether the represent appropri-
ate or inappropriate solutions
4
A check mark
indicates appropriate
solutions.
8
An X mark indicates
solutions that are not
appropriate.
A
B
C
D
E
Design Topic Heading
Intent Statement: This explains
the desired outcome for the specific
design element and provides a basis
for the design guidelines that follow.
If a guideline does not specifically ad-
dress a particular design issue, then
the city will use the intent statement
to determine appropriateness.
Design Guideline: This describes
a desired outcome related to the
intent statement.
Additional Information: This
provides a bullet list of examples of
how, or how not to, comply with the
guideline.
Illustration(s): These provide
photos and/or diagrams to illustrate
related conditions or possible
approaches. They may illustrate ap-
propriate or inappropriate solutions
as described at right.
DESIGN GUIDELINES FORMAT
The River District design guidelines are presented in a standardized format as illustrated below. Each of the illustrated com-
ponents is used by the city in determining appropriateness. Additional elements that appear on a typical page of the historic
preservation guidelines are summarized at right.
Accent Features
Accent features can add interest to the building design and may
222014 How to Use the Design Guidelines River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
3
KEY PRINCIPLES FOR DESIGN
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Key Principles for Design 25
KEY PRINCIPLES FOR DESIGN
Promote creativity.
Design with consistency and use materials with long term dura-
bility.
Achieve excellence in design. Design with authenticity.
These design principles establish expectations for
design at a “high level” for the district and shall apply to
all improvement projects.
ACHIEVE EXCELLENCE IN DESIGN
Each project in the River District should express excel-
lence in design, and it should raise the bar for others
to follow. This includes using high quality materials and
construction methods and paying attention to detail.
PROMOTE CREATIVITY
Innovation in design is welcomed in the River District.
Exploring new ways of designing buildings and spaces is
appropriate when they contribute to a cohesive urban
fabric. This type of creativity should be distinguished
from simply being “different.”
DESIGN WITH AUTHENTICITY
The River District should be defined by buildings and
places that reflect their own time. The result should
be a sense of authenticity in building and materials. All
new improvements should convey this quality.
DESIGN WITH CONSISTENCY
Buildings and places in the River District should have a
cohesive quality in the use of materials, organization of
functions and overall design. Each new project should
also embody a single, consistent design concept.
262014 Key Principles for Design River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
DESIGN FOR DURABILITY
Buildings and spaces in the River District should be
designed for the long term with durable materials.
DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABILITY
Aspects of cultural, economic and environmental sus-
tainability that relate to urban design should be woven
into all new improvements.
ENHANCE THE PUBLIC REALM
Sidewalks, promenades and other pedestrian ways
should be designed to invite their use through thought-
ful planning and design. Improvement on private prop-
erty also should enhance the public realm where they
abut.
ENHANCE THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE
Each improvement project should contribute to a
pedestrian-friendly environment. This includes defining
street edges with buildings and spaces that are visually
interesting and that attract pedestrian activity.
PROVIDE SIGNATURE OPEN SPACES
These include public and private yards, promenades,
plazas and courtyards. Enhance natural resources and
habitat for wildlife on-site, for the public to experience.
KEEP THE PARKING SUBORDINATE
Parking lots and parking structures should support
other functions and not dominate the setting. They
should be visually buffered.
Enhance the pedestrian experience. Provide signature open spaces.
Keep the automobile subordinate.
Design for sustainability.
Enhance the public realm.
4
NEIGHBORHOOD LEVEL DESIGN
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Neighborhood Level Design 29
NEIGHBORHOOD LEVEL DESIGN OVERVIEW
A key aspect of the vision for the River District is
that it establish an image as a distinct place that is
rich with a diversity of uses and varied designs, but at
the same time is to be perceived as its own distinct
neighborhood. For that reason, each project should be
conceived such that it relates well to other properties
and reinforces the continuity of the public realm.
This section addresses at systems that connect proper-
ties into the district as a whole. It will be relatively
brief, because much of these design variables relate to
the public realm and are addressed in other policies
and documents.
This section looks at systems that connect properties into the district as a whole. One way of achieving neighborhood
connections is to highlight older abandoned transportation corridors including streets and rail lines. Examples include
Chestnut St., Pine St. and the Union Pacific rail spur. An opportunity exists to highlight these as view corridors, pedestrian
ways, internal lanes and multipurpose alleys, for example.
Old rail spur
Historic
Pine St ROW
Historic
Chestnut St ROW
Old rail spur
Jefferson St
Willow St
Linden St Linden St
Old rail spur
North
NTS
302014 Neighborhood Level Design River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
CONNECTIONS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
Pedestrian circulation systems provide access to
buildings, courtyards, internal paths and plazas. These
systems should interconnect and promote pedestrian
movement throughout the neighborhood. In most
cases, these connections will simply involve an exten-
sion of the existing sidewalk network but should also
include internal circulation systems within the develop-
ment.
Auto circulation should also interconnect to minimize
automobile impacts. Shared drives, limited curb cuts
and turning movements should be considered.
4.1 Provide convenient vehicular ,
pedestrian and bikeway connections
among abutting properties.
› Create an internal circulation system that will
link those of adjacent properties, when feasible.
4.2 Reinforce the historic network of
streets, rail lines and alleys.
› Reinforce the historic network of streets, rail
lines and alleys as public circulation space and
for maximum public access.
› Consider ways to express the location of earlier
circulation routes; for example, highlight rail
spurs.
› Link to existing public right-of-ways, when
feasible.
Appropriate pedestrian connections include mid-block
passages.
Provide convenient vehicular, pedestrian and bikeway
connections among abutting properties.
4 4
4
The Fort Collins Land Use Code addresses street
connections in the R-D-R District. It states that:
“Redevelopment shall maintain the existing block
grid system of streets and alleys. To the extent
reasonably feasible, the system shall be augmented
with additional connections, including new walkway
spines in substitution of streets and/or alleys.” (Divi-
sion 4.14)
Reinforce the historic network of streets, rail lines and
alleys as public circulation space and for maximum public
access. The treatment of the Old Historic District alleys
are a successful example of enhanced connectivity.
CONNECTIVITY
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Neighborhood Level Design 31
4.3 Connect a development to
established pedestrian ways.
› Appropriate pedestrian connections include:
• Sidewalks
• Internal walkways, within an individual
property
• Mid-block passages
• Multi-use alleys
› Appropriate features with which to connect
include:
• Plazas and courtyards
• Other buildings
4.4 Locate a new walkway to animate the
River District pedestrian network
and its associated outdoor spaces.
› Direct a walkway through a plaza, courtyard
or other outdoor use area to help animate the
space.
4.5 Where a curb cut is to be installed,
keep the width to a minimum.
› Consider using shared driveways between
properties to reduce the number of curb cuts.
› Utilize smaller curbs radii when feasible.
4.6 Minimize the width of a curb cut.
› Avoid disruptions in the walkway systems.
CONNECTIVITY
Direct a walkway through a plaza, courtyard or
other outdoor use area to help animate the space.
322014 Neighborhood Level Design River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
EARLY RAIL LINES
4.7 Existing railroad corridors, spurs
and tracks should be expressed in
new design to the extent feasible.
› This may be accomplished by using the area as a
linear open space, a pathway or a drive.
› Where they exist, incorporate railroad tracks
into the project design.
› The adaptive reuse of abandoned railroad cor-
ridors and spurs to provide public green space
or other amenities for use and enjoyment of the
neighborhood is encouraged.
› Retain the corridor as open space, a walkway or
service land when feasible.
› In any case, maintain the feature as a view cor-
ridor to the extent feasible.
4
CONNECTIVITY
Where they exist, incorporate railroad tracks into the
project design.
The adaptive reuse of abandoned railroad corridors and
spurs to provide public green space or other amenities for
use and enjoyment of the neighborhood is encouraged. 4
4
4
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Neighborhood Level Design 33
VIEW CORRIDORS
Providing view corridors, in terms of open space, con-
nections, and building massing is a key concept.
Views from public rights-of-way to landmarks and
natural features should be maintained and taken into
account in the designing of sites and buildings. The
location of the building on a site, in addition to its scale,
height, and massing, can impact views from the adja-
cent public right-of-way, including streets, sidewalks,
intersections, and public spaces. Development projects
should try to preserve noteworthy views, such as
views to the river, a landmark or along the railroad
right-of-way.
4.8 Enhance views from the public way
to natural features and historic
landmarks when feasible.
› Strategically locate a building on a site to main-
tain key views or frame views as perceived from
the public right-of-way.
› Vary a building’s height and massing to provide
view corridors.
Maintain existing railroad tracks as a view corridor to the
extent feasible.
4
VIEWS
342014 Neighborhood Level Design River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
SITES ALONG THE RIVERFRONT
The guidelines in this section provide additional detail
regarding compatible development along the river.
Note that opportunities for connections exist for
properties behind those that abut the river as well.
4.9 Retain historic relationships between
buildings, landscape features, and
open spaces.
4.10 Where two or more buildings will
be located on a site, arrange them
to def ine an outdoor space.
› Clustering buildings to create active open spac-
es, such as plazas and courtyards, is encouraged
along the street and river edges.
› Consider seasonal sun and shade patterns when
positioning plazas and courtyards. Provide op-
portunities for shade in summer months and
sun in winter months.
4.11 Provide connections to the river
trail, when feasible.
› Consider these approaches:
• directly from an individual property
• along a shared walkway
• align with the grid
The Fort Collins Land Use Code addresses riv-
erfront sites in the R-D-R District. It states that:
“On sites that have River frontage between Linden
Street and Lincoln Avenue, buildings or clusters of
buildings shall be located and designed to form
outdoor spaces (such as balconies, arcades, terraces,
decks or courtyards) on the River side of the build-
ings and/or between buildings, as integral parts of
a transition between development and the River. A
continuous connecting walkway (or walkway system)
linking such spaces shall be developed, including
coordinated linkages between separate development
projects.”
RIVERFRONT RELATIONSHIP
5
SITE DESIGN GUIDELINES
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Site Design Guidelines 37
This section addresses site design principles as they ap-
ply to an individual parcel or to a complex of properties
being planned as a coordinated project. The objective is
to promote developments that have a comprehensive
approach to the use of land, with a focus on enhanc-
ing the street, providing for efficient functional site
requirements using high quality and enduring designs.
The Site Design Guidelines address the placement of
a building on its site, as well as basic approaches to
landscaping and construction of outdoor amenities.
Functional requirements related to parking and site
engineering are also addressed.
Each site improvement project should enhance the
character of the district and, even though the work may
be within individual property lines, it should enhance
the experience of the public way whenever feasible. In
general, building entrances should be sited such that
they are relatively close to the street, with parking and
service areas screened from view. A general alignment
of building fronts along the street is desired, to enhance
the pedestrian experience. However, some variation in
setbacks is in character with traditional development
patterns partially in the National Register District por-
tion. Where buildings are set back from the sidewalk,
the area should be an active outdoor use, a green space
or other amenity (that is, not parking or a service
area). A variation in setbacks may also be preferred
when building adjacent to a historic structure, in order
to help retain the perception of the cultural resource
in its setting.
Landscape designs that reference the industrial heri-
tage of the area or of the river heritage are especially
appropriate.
Some of the key site design features that should be
used to enhance the street edge are these:
› Pedestrian-oriented entries
› Windows facing the street
› Small public spaces linked to the sidewalk
› Urban streetscape design and landscaping
› Street furniture
› Public art
The vision for development
immediately adjacent to the Cache La
Poudre River focuses on a connecting
walkway that links properties. This
is a key site design concept for this
part of the River District. Providing a
“progression” of outdoor spaces that
orient to the river is also important.
OVERVIEW TO THE SITE DESIGN GUIDELINES
4
The scenic Cache La Poudre River
Some of the key site design features that should be
used to activate the river edge are these:
› Pedestrian-oriented entries
› Windows, balconies, arcades, dining areas and
verandas
› Plazas
382014 Site Design Guidelines River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
COORDINATION OF OPEN SPACE
AMENITIES
Open space at the ground level should be provided as
an amenity in a project, and may take the form of a
plaza, courtyard, or a green space. Other types may
be walkways that connect outdoor areas. Still others
may be a part of the architecture, as decks, balconies
and rooftop areas. Each open space should be designed
to enhance the public way, to the extent feasible, in
addition to providing amenities for the site itself.
5.1 Create open space for public
enjoyment.
› Where open space is required, design the area
so that it can be used, or at least observed, by
the public as an asset.
› Also design it for year-round appreciation.
Open space that can be enjoyed visually and functionally is
considered to be “positive,” as opposed to areas that are
not well designed to accommodate use or serve as a visual
amenity. Planning a landscape design to coordinate with
abutting properties is encouraged.
OPEN SPACE AMENITIES
The Fort Collins Land Use Code addresses open
space in the R-D-R District. It states that:
“Buildings and extensions of buildings shall be
designed to form outdoor spaces such as balconies,
arcades, terraces, decks or courtyards, and to inte-
grate development with the landscape to the extent
reasonably feasible.”
4
Open space at the ground level should be provided as an amenity in a project, and may take the form of a plaza,
courtyard, or a green space.
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Site Design Guidelines 39
LOCATING OPEN SPACE AMENITIES
Courtyards, plazas and pocket parks provide places for
people to gather, engage in activities and enjoy a sense
of community, and these are encouraged throughout
the River District.
5.4 Locate an open space amenity
where it will activate the street and
enhance the pedestrian experience
throughout the district.
› Orient this space to link with other pedestrian
activities, primary circulation paths, views, cul-
tural resources and natural features.
› Locate the space along active pedestrian circula-
tion paths.
› Locating a space at the sidewalk level is pre-
ferred; however, raised areas that mimic loading
docks are appropriate.
5.2 Coordinate open space designs with
those of abutting properties when
feasible.
› Position a landscaped open space so it can be
shared by adjoining buildings or an individual
property.
› Also, position outdoor open space on an indi-
vidual site so it may also visually or physically
connect with open space on adjoining proper-
ties.
5.3 Design a water detention feature to
serve as amenity.
› Design the detention area to serve as a visual
amenity year round.
› Also coordinate a detention area design with
adjoining properties when feasible.
Position a landscaped open
space so it can be shared
by adjoining buildings or an
individual property.
Design a plaza, courtyard or pocket
park to be inviting.
Hardscape plaza amenity along the rear
of a property
Softscape natural amenity.
4 4 4
The storm detention areas shown above are designed to serve as site amenities. Both
design approaches are appropriate.
OPEN SPACE AMENITIES
4
4
Raised areas that mimic loading docks are
appropriate open space amenities.
402014 Site Design Guidelines River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
SCALE OF OPEN SPACE AMENITIES
The size of an open space as an amenity should be suf-
ficient to accommodate the intended uses and provide
a sense of energy. It should not be over-sized, such that
the space will appear to be under-utilized.
5.5 Design open space to provide a
comfortable scale for pedestrians.
› Define the space with building fronts that con-
vey a human scale.
› Include landscape elements and site structures
that convey a human scale.
4 4
4 4 4
OPEN SPACE AMENITIES
The size of an open space as an amenity should be sufficient to accommodate the intended uses and provide a sense of energy. It should not be over-sized, such that the
space will appear to be under-utilized.
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Site Design Guidelines 41
SIDEWALK DINING AREAS
Outdoor dining areas and sidewalk cafés can help
animate the public realm. While most dining areas are
expected to be located within individual properties,
there may be cases in which dining will be permitted
on a public sidewalk. These areas typically include a
grouping of tables and/or seating for the purpose of
eating, drinking, or social gathering. Each one should
be designed to maintain comfortable pedestrian flow
along the sidewalk.
5.6 Locate a sidewalk dining area to
accommodate pedestrian traffic
along the sidewalk.
› Placing a sidewalk dining area immediately
adjacent to a building front is preferred, thus
maintaining a public walkway along the curb
side.
› Maintain a clear path along the sidewalk for
pedestrians; a width of 8 feet for this clear path
is recommended, but this may be reduced to 5
feet where no other obstacles in the sidewalk
will impede pedestrian traffic.
› A railing, barrier, series of planters, or similar
edge treatment should be used to define the
perimeter of a sidewalk dining area.
› Any railing or barrier should be sturdy and of
durable materials. Using a chain, cord, or other
flexible system is typically inappropriate.
The boundary of a patio area may be defined with an
awning in addition to temporary railings.
4
Rail construction must be sturdy and of durable materials.
4
5.7 Design a sidewalk dining area to be
an asset to the River District.
› Tables and chairs should be of high-quality and
durable, and specifically designed for outdoor
use.
› Tables, chairs, and other components of a
sidewalk dining area should not be permanently
attached within the public right-of-way.
OPEN SPACE AMENITIES
Each development project should contribute to the public
realm in a positive way. Where buildings are set back from
the sidewalk, the area should be an active outdoor use,
a green space or other amenity (that is, not parking or a
service area).
4
422014 Site Design Guidelines River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
Outdoor furnishings should be of durable materials.
4
CHARACTER OF THE STREET EDGE
Landscape design within an individual property should
be in character with the tradition of agricultural, indus-
trial and commercial uses that are a part of the heritage
of the River District. Where such a landscaped area
abuts a public way, or is visible from it, the design
should enhance the pedestrian experience as well
5.8 Create a well-def ined street edge
with pedestrian-scaled design
elements.
› Include decorative paving, planted areas, public
art, ornamental lighting and other pieces of
street furniture.
› Design the site edge to be compatible with the
streetscape in the public realm.
5.9 Design site furnishings and
landscapes to complement the
character of the district.
› Designs that draw upon the agricultural-
industrial utilitarian heritage, while introducing
new designs are encouraged.
› Use materials seen traditionally, such as metal
work.
5.10 Locate site furnishings in areas of
high pedestrian activity.
› Position site furniture at pedestrian route inter-
sections, major building entrances and outdoor
gathering places.
Landscape designs and site furnishing used within
an individual property should be compatible with the
established palette of street furnishings that is used in the
public realm.
A consistent palette of street lights, trees and furniture
helps establish continuity in the public realm. A similar
sense of consistency in design should appear in private
landscape designs.
4
STREET EDGE
4 4
Include decorative paving, planted areas, public art,
ornamental lighting and other pieces of street furniture to
enhance the street edge.
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Site Design Guidelines 43
PARKING LOCATION
Parking areas, including surface lots and structures,
should be positioned such that they are subordinate to
other uses on the site, with respect to edges that abut
the public realm.
5.11 Locate a parking area to be visually
subordinate to landscapes and
buildings.
› Locate it to the interior of a site where feasible.
› This is especially important on a corner prop-
erty, where it is important to provide a sense of
enclosure of the street wall.
› This is also essential for properties abutting the
river.
5.12 Site a surface lot so it will minimize
gaps in the continuous building wall
of a block.
› Place the parking at the rear of the site, or if this
is not feasible, to the side of the building.
Locate a parking area to the interior of a site where
feasible.
Building
Alley
Street
Parking
4
PARKING EDGE
VISUAL IMPACTS OF PARKING
Parking facilities, such as surface lots, should be de-
signed to be visual assets and to minimize negative im-
pacts upon the public realm. Where a portion of a lot
will be exposed, it should be buffered with landscaping.
5.13 Provide a visual buffer where a
parking lot abuts a public sidewalk.
› Note that “buffering” does not mean fully
screening the parking, but it does require cre-
ating a visual “filter” that softens the view of
parked cars.
› A low wall may be used as a buffer. Its materials
should be compatible with those of the building
on the site.
› A planted buffer may also be used, consisting
of a combination of trees, shrubs and ground
covers.
A planted buffer may be used, consisting of a combination
of trees, shrubs and ground covers.
4
Visually buffer parking areas.
4
The Fort Collins Land Use Code addresses park-
ing locations in the R-D-R District. It states that:
“Proposed parking lots and/or vehicular use areas
located within fifty (50) feet of any street right-of-
way shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the street
frontage of the parcel upon which the parking lot or
vehicular use area is proposed.”
442014 Site Design Guidelines River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
FENCE AND SITE WALL DESIGNS
Site walls and fences should be integrated with build-
ing design and the character of the district. Fences and
walls can provide security and privacy and may be ap-
propriate along the rear and side of lots. While fences
and walls often serve a utilitarian function, they should
also enhance the character of the street and appear
to be integral components of building and site design.
Aside from those that may be used to screen trash
storage, fences and walls should be pedestrian scaled
and permit partial views into the property.
5.14 Design a fence or a site wall to be an
integral part of the landscape and
serve as an amenity that adds visual
interest to the property.
› Use materials that are durable and compatible
with the primary structure on site.
› A decorative metal design is preferred for a
fence.
› Using brick or stone piers is also encouraged.
› Native stone and brick are appropriate for site
walls.
› Vinyl, chain link, or wire is inappropriate.
› Opaque privacy fences are inappropriate along
primary street frontages.
4
4
Design a site fence and wall to be an integral part of the
building and site.
FENCING AND SITE WALLS
The Fort Collins Land Use Code addresses site
walls and fences in the R-D-R District. It states
that:
“Walls, fences and planters shall be designed to
match or be consistent with the quality of materials,
the style and colors of nearby buildings. Brick, stone
or other masonry may be required for walls or fence
columns.”
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Site Design Guidelines 45
SERVICE AREA DESIGN
Service areas, such as loading docks, dumpsters, and
delivery entrances, should be visually unobtrusive and
should be integrated with the design of the site and the
building. Service areas are typically most appropriate
when located to the rear of a building and not visible
from the public right-of-way. However, in an industrial
setting other orientations may be considered if they
are designed to enhance the public realm.
5.15 Locate a service area that requires
vehicle access where conflicts
with pedestrian circulation will be
minimized.
› Provide access from an alley when feasible.
› If an alley access is not feasible, then consider
using a secondary street.
› If necessary, install a service drive, which is lo-
cated away from intersections and other areas
with high levels of pedestrian traffic.
5.16 Minimize the visual impacts of
service areas.
› Orient the service area toward service lanes or
alleys and away from major streets.
› Where a service area or dumpster must be ori-
ented to the street, screen it with an architec-
tural feature. The design should be in character
with the building and provide visual interest at
the street level.
SERVICE AREA
5.17 Position a service area to minimize
conf licts with other abutting uses.
› Service areas should be located away from any
abutting residential uses, where possible.
› Service areas should be shared between prop-
erties when feasible.
5.18 Design a service drive to be a visual
asset.
› Consider using decorative and porous paving
materials in service drives
Screen equipment from view or design it to complement
the building design. (In this industrial context, a metal and
concrete screen is used.)
4
4
Where a service area or dumpster must be oriented to the
street, screen it with an architectural feature. The design
should be in character with the building and provide visual
interest at the street level.
4
462014 Site Design Guidelines River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
6
BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Building Design Guidelines 49
This section provides guidelines for the design of new
buildings in the River District. New buildings are an-
ticipated throughout the River District as investment
in the area continues. At the same time, it is important
that each development contribute to an overall sense
of continuity. Designs that result in a compatible sense
of scale, and an enhanced pedestrian-oriented environ-
ment are key, while also drawing upon the building
traditions of the River District at large as inspiration
for new, creative designs. These building guidelines
express the concept that each project can have indi-
viduality while also helping to establish a visual unity
for the district.
ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER
The agricultural industrial and early commercial past
establishes a design context for the River District. New
infill buildings should draw upon the characteristics of
agricultural industrial and commercial architecture of
the past. Historic styles should not be imitated, and
new construction should appear as a product of its
own time, while also being compatible with historic
resources.
6.1 Build upon the industrial, agricultural
and commercial heritage of the
River District.
› New buildings should reflect the industrial, agri-
cultural and commercial buildings of the area in
new, creative ways.
› Contemporary interpretations of building
forms, massing, materials and details are en-
couraged.
4 4 4
4 4
6.2 The exact imitation of historic
styles is inappropriate for new
construction.
› This blurs the distinction between old and new
buildings and makes it more difficult to visually
interpret the architectural evolution of the dis-
trict.
BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES
502014 River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
Building Design Guidelines
BUILDING MASS AND SCALE
A new building should reflect the mass and scale of
traditional industrial, agricultural and commercial
buildings types, which was typically a composition of
simple geometric forms.
To ensure that human scale is achieved in new devel-
opment, it is important to focus design attention on
aspects most directly experienced by pedestrians, such
as the height of a building and architectural details
as perceived at the street level. Providing a series of
vertical pilasters, a band of windows and storefront
features are examples. Other vertical and horizontal
articulation features are also appropriate.
This building is designed with a composition of simple geometric building
forms of various size in horizontal and vertical orientation, reflecting the
industrial character of the area. This is an appropriate building design.
These buildings are designed with simple geometric shapes that reflect the agricultural and industrial character of the area. These are
appropriate building forms.
4
4 4
The Fort Collins Land Use Code
addresses building mass and scale in
the R-D-R District. It states that:
“Multiple story buildings of up to five
(5) stories are permitted; however,
massing shall be terraced back from
the River and from streets as follows:
› buildings or parts of buildings
shall step down to one (1) story
abutting the River landscape
frontage; and
› buildings or parts of buildings
shall step down to three (3) sto-
ries or less abutting any street
frontage.
No building wall shall exceed one
hundred twenty-five (125) feet on the
axis along the River.”
(2) Provide examples of stepped
building forms; indicate general
depth of setback that is appropriate
for upper floors.
(3) Note 4th story always steps back.
(4) Wall lengths should be in scale
with those seen traditionally on
industrial buildings in the area.
MASS AND SCALE
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Building Design Guidelines 51
Some of the largest traditional warehouses included
interesting fenestration which created visual interest,
and is partially why the older industrial buildings are so
visually appealing. Incorporating these types of features
should be considered.
6.3 The primary industrial building form
should appear similar to those seen
traditionally.
› Simple rectilinear building forms are appropri-
ate. Avoid the use of highly complex forms.
› The facade should appear as predominantly flat,
with any decorative elements and projecting or
setback “articulations” appearing to be subordi-
nate to the dominant form.
6.4 Maintain the scale of traditional
building widths in the district.
› Design a new building to reflect the established
range of the traditional building widths in the
district.
› Where a building must exceed this width, use
changes in design features so the building reads
as separate building modules reflecting tradi-
tional building widths and massing.
› Attention to the designs of transitions between
modules is important. Too much variation,
which results in an overly busy design, is inap-
propriate.
6.5 Reflect the height of traditional
buildings as perceived at the street
level.
› Facade heights of new buildings should fall
within the established range of the block. Set
taller portions back from the street.
› Floor-to-floor heights should appear similar to
those of traditional buildings from the district.
4
Changes in details of materials, window design, pilasters or
materials are examples of techniques that should be con-
sidered to reflect the mass and scale of traditional industrial
buildings.
Note the stepped parapet and the offset at the entry on
this new industrial-like building. These design features
reflect the established range of simple industrial buildings
found within the district. They also help to break up the
mass of the building in a simple way.
4
Incorporating simple commercial building types is appropriate. The facade widths should reflect the traditional range of
the building widths seen in the district.
4
MASS AND SCALE
522014 River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
Building Design Guidelines
›
6.6 Position taller portions of a structure
away from neighboring buildings of
lower scale, natural resources and
the street.
› A taller new building should step down in height
to lower scaled neighbors, especially adjacent to
historic buildings.
› The taller portion of a new structure should be
located to minimize looming effects and shading
of lower scaled neighbors, the street and the
river.
6.7 Use building articulation techniques
to establish a sense of human scale
in the building design.
› Use vertical and horizontal articulation design
techniques to reduce the apparent scale of a
larger building mass.
4
The taller portion of a new structure should
be located to minimize looming effects and
shading of lower scaled neighbors, the street
and the river.
4
A series of simple building wall offsets provide vertical
articulation on this multifamily structure.
A simple facade offset provides articulation on this com-
mercial structure.
The Fort Collins Land Use Code addresses articu-
lation in the R-D-R District. It states that:
“Exterior building walls shall be subdivided and pro-
portioned to human scale, using offsets, projections,
overhangs and recesses, in order to add architectural
interest and variety and avoid the effect of a single,
massive wall with no relation to human size.”
4
4
MASS AND SCALE
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Building Design Guidelines 53
STREET LEVEL
A building should be designed to provide visual interest
to pedestrians. For example, storefronts are of inter-
est to passersbys. Decorative wall surfaces may also be
used where a portion of a facade is a blank wall. These
features encourage pedestrian activity and should be
used.
6.8 Develop the street level of a
building to provide visual interest
to pedestrians.
› All sides of a building should include architec-
tural details to avoid presenting a “back side” to
the street or to neighboring properties. Provide
visual interest with:
• Well-defined windows and doors
• A display window or storefront that provides
views to activities in the building
• Display cases for exhibits
• Decorative wall surface, for example, a
change in materials or wall art
• Building articulation
• Site walls and raised planters
› A large expanse of blank wall is inappropriate on
any street-oriented facade.
4
Providing openings with industrial glass similar in size to
traditional loading doors is appropriate.
4
A building should be designed to pro-
vide visual interest to pedestrians.
All sides of a building should include
architectural details to avoid present-
ing a “back side” to the street or to
neighboring properties. A decorative
wall surface is an appropriate design
feature.
Decorative wall surfaces provide visual interest at the street
level. For example, a change in materials is appropriate.
4
4 4
PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY EDGE
542014 River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
Building Design Guidelines
Develop the street level of a building to provide visual interest to pedestrians. This series of images show
appropriate ways to enhance the visual interest of a building façade within in an industrial context.
4 4 4 4
4 4 4
PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY EDGE
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Building Design Guidelines 55
SOLID-TO-VOID RATIO
Some traditional buildings in the River District ap-
peared as rectangular solids, with holes “punched”
in the walls for windows and doors, resulting in a
relatively uniform solid-to-void ratio. A similar ratio of
wall surface to that of building openings, is appropriate
on new buildings.
6.9 Use a ratio of solid-to-void (wall-
to-window) similar to that found
on traditional buildings in the area.
› Large surfaces of uninterrupted glass are gen-
erally discouraged as a primary fenestration
treatment, but may be used as areas of accent.
Where a large area of glass is planned, it should
be detailed to convey a sense of scale.
› Divide large glass surfaces into smaller panes
similar to those seen traditionally.
4
This traditional building shows relatively uniform solid-to-
void ratios.
4
Use a ratio of solid-to-void (wall-to-window) similar to that
found on traditional industrial structures.
Use a ratio of solid-to-void (wall-to-window) similar
to that found on traditional industrial structures.
4
SOLID-TO-VOID
562014 River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
Building Design Guidelines
4
ROOF FORM
6.10 A roof form should be similar to
those used traditionally.
› Flat, and low-pitch roofs are appropriate. In
some cases a low barrel roof may be appropri-
ate.
› Gable roofs may be used to provide an accent
to a building module.
› “Exotic” roof forms, including mansards and
A-frames, are inappropriate.
4
4
4
The Fort Collins Land Use Code addresses roofli-
nes in the R-D-R District. It states that:
“A minimum pitch of 8:12 shall be used for gable and
hip roofs to the maximum extent feasible. Where
hipped roofs are used alone, the minimum pitch shall
be 6:12.
Flat-roofed buildings shall feature three-dimensional
cornice treatment on all walls facing streets, the river
or connecting walkways, unless they are stepped and
terraced back to form a usable roof terrace area(s).”
A roof form should be similar to those used
traditionally. Flat, and low-pitch roofs are
appropriate.In some cases a low barrel roof
may be appropriate.
ROOFS
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Building Design Guidelines 57
PRIMARY MATERIALS
Materials that are “authentic” and durable are pre-
ferred. Materials for new structures and additions to
existing buildings should contribute to the context of
the district and convey high quality in design and detail.
The intent is to promote visual continuity in the basic
materials palette, while encouraging creativity in their
use.
6.11 New building materials should
contribute to the visual continuity
of the design context.
› Genuine masonry, metal, concrete, structural
steel and glass are preferred.
› “Green” (sustainable) materials are also ap-
propriate. These include materials which are:
locally manufactured, easy to maintain, proven
to be durable in the Fort Collins climate, have
long life spans, recyclable, made from recycled
or repurposed materials, not manufactured us-
ing harsh chemicals, and do not off-gas harsh
chemicals.
› Avoid using synthetic materials, such as alumi-
num or vinyl siding, imitation brick or imitation
stone and plastic, which are not proven to be
durable, are difficult to repair and recycle or
that employ harsh manufacturing methods.
› Avoid using materials that are out of scale with
those seen traditionally, or that have a finish
which is out of character.
Materials for new structures and additions to existing buildings should contribute to the
context of the district and convey high quality in design and detail. Images above and on
the adjacent page convey an appropriate use of materials.
Concrete which is detailed to provide a
sense of scale is an appropriate build-
ing material.
4
4
The Fort Collins Land Use Code ad-
dresses primary building materials in the
R-D-R District. It states that:
“Textured materials with native and his-
toric characteristics such as brick, stone
and wood, and materials with similar
characteristics and proportions shall be
used in a repeating pattern as integral
parts of the exterior building fabric, to the
maximum extent feasible.”
4
BUILDING MATERIALS
582014 River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
Building Design Guidelines
6.12 Use high quality, durable materials.
› The material should be proven to be durable in
the local Fort Collins climate.
› The material should maintain an intended fin-
ish over time or acquire a patina, when it is
understood to be a desired outcome.
› Materials at the ground level should withstand
on-going contact with the public, sustaining
impacts without compromising the appearance.
(Note that some synthetic materials will not
sustain this degree of frequent contact.)
6.13 The use of traditional masonry
materials is encouraged.
› Brick and concrete are well-established materi-
als in the River District and their continued use
is encouraged.
› Brick should have a modular dimension and a
warm color similar to that used traditionally.
› Assure that masonry units wrap around corners
of walls, and thus do not appear to be an applied
veneer.
6.14 Architectural metals, which are
detailed to provide a sense of scale,
are appropriate.
› The metal should have a proven durability in the
Fort Collins climate.
› Metals should be detailed in a manner that will
endure.
› Architectural metals should convey a sense of
human scale. For example, a sense of scale can
be achieved through the use of smaller scaled
panels, varying forms and designs, creating pat-
terns to provide visual interest, or eliminating
expanses of unarticulated wall space.
6.15 New materials that are similar in
character to traditional ones may
be acceptable with appropriate
detailing.
› Alternative materials should appear similar in
scale, proportion, texture and finish to those
used traditionally.
› It is appropriate to use a change in materials
as an accent in building design. This can help to
express individual modules or units.
Architectural metals, which are detailed to provide a sense
of scale, are appropriate.
Exposed structural steel with glass curtain wall
or mesh features are appropriate materials to
use in the district.
4
4
BUILDING MATERIALS
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Building Design Guidelines 59
SECONDARY MATERIALS
Secondary materials can help define building scale and
proportion. If any are used, they should be integrated
into the building design; for example, they can be used
to articulate horizontal and vertical design elements.
Secondary materials may include all of those listed as
primary materials and may also include stucco, similar
products and synthetics with proven durability.
6.16 Secondary building materials should
visually relate to the overall building
design, when used.
› Secondary building materials should help to
define building scale and proportion.
ROOF MATERIALS
6.17 New roof materials for sloped
surfaces should complement the
architectural style and context.
› When choosing a roof material for sloped
surfaces, the architectural style of the structure
should be considered.
› Appropriate roof materials include standing
seam metal roofs (low and narrow seam profile)
and photovoltaic systems in dark matte, non-
reflective finishes, for example. Composition
shingles are also appropriate on smaller struc-
tures.
4
Secondary building materials such as these wood panel
window surrounds articulate both the vertical and hori-
zontal expression in the building design.
The Fort Collins Land Use Code addresses sec-
ondary building materials in the R-D-R District. It
states that:
“Other exterior materials, if any, shall be used as
integral parts of the overall building fabric, in repeat-
ing modules, proportioned both horizontally and
vertically to relate to human scale, and with enough
depth at joints between architectural elements to
cast shadows, in order to better ensure that the
character and image of new buildings are visually
related to the Downtown and River context.”
New roof materials for sloped surfaces should convey a
scale and texture similar to those used traditionally.
4
BUILDING MATERIALS
602014 River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
Building Design Guidelines
ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING
6.18 Simple, unembellished architectural
detailing is appropriate.
› Elaborate architectural treatments, such as
decorative moldings at cornices, windows and
door surrounds, are inappropriate.
› Exposed structural elements are appropriate as
detailing.
› Simple brick relief patterns such as recessed
brick, corbeled brick, belt course/banding, and
pilasters, are appropriate. Parapet walls with or
without stepped gables are also appropriate.
PRIMARY ENTRANCE
The primary entrance should be clearly identifiable and
should be oriented to a major street, pedestrian way,
plaza, courtyard and/or other key public space.
6.19 Design a main entrance of a building
to be clearly identifiable.
› Provide a sheltering element such as a canopy,
and define it by a simple surround or recess.
6.20 Orient the primary entrance of a
building to face a street, plaza or
pedestrian way.
› Consider using a “double-fronted” design where
entrances from parking areas or plazas are to
the rear.
› Focusing an entrance toward a parking lot or
other secondary site feature without also ad-
dressing the street is inappropriate.
4
The primary entrance should be clearly identifiable and should be oriented to a major street, pedestrian way, plaza,
courtyard and/or other key public space.
4 4
Simple, unembellished architectural detailing is appropriate.
4 4
BUILDING FEATURES
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Building Design Guidelines 61
WINDOWS
Windows should be well defined, using frames, sills and
lintels. Windows can also be located to define building
stories, circulation features, entrances and storefronts.
Window placement and composition should also con-
sider human scale and proportion in the overall design.
6.21 Windows should be defined in
traditional masonry wall planes.
› A window frame should be located so a distinct
profile is present. It should be slightly recessed
and a shadow line should be visible.
› Also consider incorporating simple lintels and
sills in masonry structures.
6.22 Use window placement and
composition to def ine human scale
as well.
› For example, the use of storefronts along a
pedestrian way is appropriate.
› The use of banding and regularly spaced punched
window openings to define building stories is
also appropriate.
A window frame should be located so a distinct profile is present; for example, it
should be slightly recessed and a shadow line should be visible.
4 4
4 4
The Fort Collins Land Use
Code addresses windows in
the R-D-R District. It states
that:
“Windows shall be indi-
vidually defined with detail
elements such as frames,
sills and lintels, and placed
so as to visually establish and
define the building stories
and establish human scale
and proportion. Glass curtain
walls and spandrel-glass strip
windows shall not be used
as the predominant style of
fenestration for buildings in
this District. This requirement
shall not serve to restrict
the use of atrium, lobby or
greenhouse-type accent fea-
tures used as embellishments
to the principal building.”
BUILDING FEATURES
622014 River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
Building Design Guidelines
ACCENT FEATURES
Accent features can add interest to the building design
and may be incorporated into the structure. They
should complement the overall composition and design
of the building. Accent features can include entry ways,
loading docks, garage bays, balconies, canopies, cupo-
las, secondary connections and vertical elevator shafts.
They can be highlighted with a change in material, color
or other architectural treatment appropriate to the
context.
6.23 Design accent features to
complement the overall composition
of the building and its context.
› Use complementary building materials and
colors.
› Consider the mass and scale of the feature in
respect to the overall building composition.
› Do not overuse an accent feature.
4
4 4 4
4
Design accent features to complement the overall composition and design of the
building and context.
BUILDING FEATURES
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Building Design Guidelines 63
AWNINGS AND CANOPIES
Awnings and canopies provide an accent to a building
design or plaza. They also protect pedestrians from
the elements. A canopy that is attached to a building
also provides an extension of the interior space and
helps cool the building. Their use is encouraged.
6.24 Design a new canopy or awning to be
in character with the building and
its context.
› Mount an awning or canopy to accentuate
character-defining features.
› Fit the awning or canopy with the opening of
the building.
› Design an awning to be a subordinate feature
on the façade.
› Use colors that are compatible with the overall
color scheme of the façade. Solid colors are
encouraged.
› Use simple shed shapes or horizontal planes for
most canopies.
› Do not impede pedestrian movement with a
canopy.
› The use of durable frame materials, glass and
fabric are appropriate.
4 4
Canopies provide an accent to a building design or plaza
and are appropriate accent features in the district.
4
BUILDING FEATURES
642014 River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
Building Design Guidelines
GUIDELINES FOR STRUCTURED PARKING:
6.25 When parking in a structure
occurs at the street level on a
primary street, it should ideally
have an active use at the sidewalk
edge.
› On a secondary street, other methods of pro-
viding visual interest may be employed. In these
locations, use architectural details, murals and
public art, wall sculpture or display cases at the
street level to provide interest to pedestrians.
6.26 The massing of a parking structure
should appear similar in scale to
other buildings in the area.
› See the guidelines for “Mass and Scale” begin-
ning on page 50.
6.27 Parking levels located above the
f irst f loor shall be screened.
› Wrapping the parking with another use is pre-
ferred.
› When an active use is not feasible, provide an
architectural screen.
› Screening that reflects window patterns along
the street is appropriate.
STRUCTURED PARKING
When parking in a structure occurs at the street level on a primary street, it should ideally have an active use
at the sidewalk edge.
When an active use
is not feasible along
the pedestrian level,
provide an architec-
tural screen.
DRAFT II
River District Design Guidelines | January 2014 Building Design Guidelines 65
EXTERIOR MECHANICAL AND ELECTRI-
CAL EQUIPMENT
Junction boxes, solar panels, wind turbines, external
fire connections and standpipes, utility meters,
telecommunication devices, cables, conduits, satellite
dishes, HVAC equipment and fans, and other exterior
equipment should be concealed from public view to
the extent feasible while still meeting their functional
requirements.
6.28 Minimize the visual impacts of
exterior building equipment from
the public right-of-way.
› Locate exterior building equipment out of pub-
lic view when feasible.
› Do not locate exterior building equipment on
the façade or a primary elevation when other
options exist.
› Use low-profile or screened mechanical units
on rooftops.
MISCELLANEOUS
662014 River District Design Guidelines | January
DRAFT II
Building Design Guidelines
OLD TOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
State Historical Fund, History Colorado, the Colorado Historic Project #2013-M2-032 Draft #1d March, 2014
ATTACHMENT 5
page left intentionally blank
Credits
This project was paid for in part by the State Historical Fund Grant from History
Colorado, the Colorado Historical Society. Project # 2013-M2-032
Prepared by:
Winter & Company
1265 Yellow Pine Avenue
Boulder, CO 80304
303.440.8445
www.winterandcompany.net
TABLE OF CONTENTS
III. DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE
TREATMENT OF HISTORIC RESOURCES
Architectural Details 43
Materials and Finishes 47
Windows 50
Doors and Entries 55
Commercial Storefronts 57
Historic Roofs 59
Exposed Historic Foundations 59
Loading Docks 60
Color 60
Existing Additions 62
New Additions and Accessory Structures 62
Planning for Energy Efficiency 64
Accessibility 68
Phasing Preservation Improvements 68
Temporary Stabilization Treatments 69
Existing Historic Alterations 69
IV. DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ALL PROPERTIES
Awnings and Canopies 73
Street Layout 74
Outdoor Use Areas 74
Handrails and Enclosures 75
Art and Historic Properties 76
Site Lighting 76
Building Lighting 77
Service Areas 78
Surface Parking 78
Buffers 79
Building Equipment 79
Security Devices 80
Color 82
Archeological Resources 82
INTRODUCTION
Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
About This Document 4
What are Design Standards 4
Why Have Design Standards 4
Policies Underlying the Design Standards 5
Sustainability - Social, Economic and
Environmental Benefits of Historic Preservation 7
The Development of Old Town Fort Collins 9
1. USING THE DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Review System 15
Where the Design Standards Apply 16
Design Standards Organization 17
II.. PLANNING A PRESERVATION PROJECT
What Does Historic Preservation Mean 23
Planning a Preservation Project 24
Old Town Fort Collins Case Studies 29
Designing in Context 38
Historic Architectural Styles 39
Overarching Preservation Principles 40
C 2013 Noré Winter (sketch material content)
V. DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION
Overview 85
Building Placement and Orientation 86
Architectural Character and Detail 87
Building Mass, Scale and Height 89
Building and Roof Forms 92
Entrances 93
Materials 94
Windows 95
Energy Efficiency in New Designs 97
Energy Efficiency in Building Massing 99
Environmental Performance in Building Elements 100
Solar and Wind Energy Devices 100
VI. DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SIGNS
Overview 103
Treatment of Historic Signs 104
Sign Installation on a Historic Building 105
Design of New and Modified Signs 106
Design of Specific Sign Types 107
Awning Sign 107
Interpretive Sign 107
Murals 108
Tenant Panel or Directory Sign 109
Projecting/Under-Canopy Sign 109
Flush Wall Sign 110
Window and Door Sign 111
Kiosks 112
Other Sign Types 112
Illumination 112
INTRODUCTION
Old Town Fort Collins | March 2014 3
DRAFT
Overview
Fort Collins is recognized for its rich collection of his-
toric resources. They are enjoyed by residents, business
owners and visitors as links to the city’s heritage while
also setting the stage for a vibrant future. Preserving
these assets is essential to Fort Collins’ well being.
A key collection of these historic resources is
found in the Old Town Historic District which is a
place with special meaning for Fort Collins. Once
the core of business activity, the brick and stone fa-
cades provide a link with the past. The ornamental
cornices, brackets, and lintels are records of the
skilled craftsmen who worked to build Fort Collins
at the turn of the century.
The community recognizes the significance of
the Old Town Historic District as an important
cultural resource. They wish to preserve the
inherent historic elements of individual buildings
as a cultural record for future generations and to
maintain the sense of place that exists. Responding
to this sentiment the City Council designated the
area an official locally designated historic district
in 1979. Previously, in 1978, the Secretary of the
Interior also entered a somewhat larger Old Town
Historic District into the National Register of
Historic Places.
The Landmark Preservation Commission and city
staff have the responsibility to review the proposed
changes in the area and determine their compliance
with the design standards. The design standards
are to be used by the Landmark Preservation Com-
mission and city staff to review any design changes
to the exterior of buildings within the Old Town
Historic District. They are also for designers and
owners who are planning projects within the dis-
trict.
Today, many of the historic resources found within
the Old Town Historic District have been reha-
bilitated and the district is thriving. The document
highlights the success stories of past projects and
the positive impact they have had. While rehabilita-
tion will continue in the district, additions and infill
construction are also anticipated. The standards
are intended to promote creativity that respects
the heritage of the area. They therefore encourage
development that contributes to the quality of the
district.
The historic preservation design standards promote
the community’s vision for sustainable preservation.
The standards provide direction for rehabilitation,
alteration, expansion and new construction projects
involving locally-designated individual historic land-
marks and properties in locally-designated historic
districts. They also guide city staff and the Landmark
Preservation Commission’s evaluation of such projects,
helping the city and property owners maintain the
special qualities of Fort Collins’ history.
Financial Assistance
4 Introduction
DRAFT
About this Document
WHAT ARE DESIGN STANDARDS?
The standards convey general policies about the
rehabilitation of existing structures, additions, new
construction and site work. They define a range of
appropriate responses to a variety of specific design
issues.
WHY HAVE DESIGN STANDARDS?
One purpose of the standards and the review process
through which they are administered is to promote
preservation of the historic, cultural and architectural
heritage of the Old Town Historic District. An essential
idea is to protect historic resources in the district from
alteration or demolition that might damage the unique
fabric created by buildings and sites that make up the
Old Town Historic District.
The standards also promote key principles of urban
design which focus on maintaining an attractive human-
scaled pedestrian-oriented environment.
The design standards also provide a basis for making
consistent decisions about the treatment of historic
resources and new infill within the district. Designing
a new building to fit within the historic character of
Old Town requires careful thought. Preservation in a
historic district context does not mean that the area
must be “frozen” in time, but it does mean that, when
new building occurs, they shall be in a manner that
reinforces the basic visual characteristics of the his-
toric district. In addition, they serve as educational and
Why Do We Preserve Historic Resources?
We preserve historic resources for these reasons:
» To honor our diverse heritage
» To support sound community planning and
development
» To maintain community character and
support livability
» To support sustainability in our community
planning tools for property owners and their design
professionals who seek to make improvements.
While the design standards are written for use by
the layperson to plan improvements, property own-
ers are strongly encouraged to enlist the assistance
of qualified design and planning professionals, including
architects and preservation consultants.
These standards seek to manage change so the historic
character of the district is respected while accom-
modating compatible improvements. They reflect
the city’s goals to promote economic and sustainable
development, enhance the image of the city and reuse
historic resources.
Note
In this document, “Old Town” refers to the area
officially designated as the local historic district, in
contrast to a more general reference to a larger
portion of the downtown.
Old Town Fort Collins | March 2014 5
DRAFT
Background
POLICIES UNDERLYING THE DESIGN
STANDARDS
Several regulations and policy documents establish the
foundation for the standards, including:
City Plan Fort Collins, February 15, 2011
Historic Preservation
Principle LIV16: The quality of life in Fort Collins will be
enhanced by the preservation of historic resources and
inclusion of heritage in the daily life and development of
the community.
Policy LIV 16.1 – Survey, Identify, and Prioritize Historic Re-
sources. Determine what historic resources are within the
Growth Management Area, how significant these resources
are, the nature and degree of threat to their preservation,
and methods for their protection.
Policy LIV 16.2 – Increase Awareness. Increase awareness,
understanding of, and appreciation for the value of historic
preservation in contributing to the quality of life in Fort
Collins.
Policy LIV 16.3 – Utilize Incentives. Use incentives to
encourage private sector preservation and rehabilitation of
historic resources.
Policy LIV 16.4 – Utilize Planning and Regulations. Recog-
nize the contribution of historic resources to the quality of
life in Fort Collins through ongoing planning efforts and
enforcement regulations.
Policy LIV 16.5 – Encourage Landmark Designation. Actively
encourage property owners to designate their properties as
historic landmarks.
Policy LIV 16.6 – Integrate Historic Structures. Explore
opportunities to incorporate existing structures of historic
value into new development and redevelopment activities.
Principle LIV17: Historically and architecturally significant
buildings Downtown and throughout the community will be
valued and preserved.
Policy LIV 17.1 – Preserve Historic Buildings. Preserve his-
torically significant buildings, sites and structures throughout
Downtown and the community. Ensure that new building
design respects the existing historic and architectural
character of the surrounding district by using compatible
building materials, colors, scale, mass, and design detailing
of structures.
Policy LIV 17.2 – Encourage Adaptive Reuse. In order to
capture the resources and energy embodied in existing
buildings, support and encourage the reuse, and adapta-
tion of historically significant and architecturally important
structures, including but not limited to Downtown buildings,
historic homes, etc.
Policy LIV 17.3– Ensure Congruent Energy Efficiency.
Ensure that energy efficient upgrades contribute to or
do not lessen the integrity of historic structures. Consider
attractive means of achieving efficiency such as installing
storm windows.
Land Use Code Section 3.4.7 Historic and Cul-
tural Resources
Section 3.4.7 provides standards for preservation and
treatment of historic properties and their incorpora-
6 Introduction
DRAFT
THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S
STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION
The City of Fort Collins requires the rehabilitation
projects to be in conformance with the Secretary of
the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitating
Historic Buildings as noted in the Land Use Code.
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Rehabilitation
are general rehabilitation standards established by the
National Park Service for historic properties. It is the
intent of this document to be compatible with The
Secretary of the Interior’s Standards while expanding
on the basic rehabilitation principles as they apply in
Fort Collins.
“1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be
placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the
defining characteristics of the building and its site and
environment.
2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and
preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration
of features and spaces that characterize a property shall
be avoided.
3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of
its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of
historical development, such as adding conjectural features
or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be
undertaken.
4. Most properties change over time; those changes that
have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be
retained and preserved.
For More Information
For more information on national treatments
underlying the preservation standards, see
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the
Rehabilitation:
http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/standguide/
rehab/rehab_index.htm
For More Information:
See the following web links to National Park Ser-
vice Preservation Briefs and Tech Notes:
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs.
htm
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/tech-
notes.htm
5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques
or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic
property shall be preserved.
6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather
than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires
replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall
match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual
qualities and, where feasible, materials. Replacement of
missing features shall be substantiated by documentary,
physical, or pictorial evidence.
7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting,
that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used.
The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be
undertaken using the gentlest means possible.
8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project
Old Town Fort Collins | March 2014 7
DRAFT
Historic Preservation and Sustainability
SUSTAINABILITY - SOCIAL, ECONOMIC
AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Preserving and enhancing historic places promotes the
three basic components of sustainability. These are:
(1) Cultural/Social Sustainability, (2) Environmental
Sustainability and (3) Economic Sustainability. Each of
the components is described in greater detail in the
following pages.
Preserving historic places promotes the three basic categories
of sustainability.
Environmental
Sustainability
Economic
Sustainability
Cultural/Social
Sustainability
SUSTAINABILITY
Cultural/Social Component of Sustainability
This component relates to the maintenance of the
community’s cultural traditions and social fabric. Pre-
serving historic places and patterns promotes cultural
and social sustainability by supporting everyday con-
nections between residents and the cultural heritage
of the community. These connections are reinforced
by the physical characteristics of historic places, which
often directly support environmental sustainability.
Historic properties in the district provide direct links
to the past. These links convey information about
earlier ways of life that help build an ongoing sense of
identity within the community. Residents anchored
in this sense of identity may be more involved in civic
activities and overall community sustainability efforts.
The historic development pattern of the district pro-
motes social interaction that supports a high quality of
life and helps build a sense of community. The area is
compact and walkable, providing for impromptu mix-
ing of different cultural and economic groups. Direct
connections to the public realm provide opportunities
for community interaction. This physical pattern, com-
bined with the inherent cultural connections, provides
significant support for the community’s overall sustain-
ability effort.
Environmental Component of Sustainability
This is the most often cited component of sustainability.
It relates to maintenance of the natural environment
and the systems that support human development. Re-
habilitation of historic resources is an important part
of environmental sustainability and green building initia-
tives. It directly supports environmental sustainability
through conservation of embodied energy, adaptability,
and other factors that keep historic buildings in use
over long periods of time.
Embodied Energy
Embodied energy is defined as the amount of energy
used to create and maintain the original building and
its components. Preserving a historic structure retains
8 Introduction
DRAFT
Building Materials
Many of the historic building materials used in the dis-
trict contribute to environmental sustainability though
local sourcing and long life cycles. Buildings constructed
with wood and masonry were built for longevity and
ongoing repair. Today, new structures utilize a signifi-
cant percentage of manufactured materials. These ma-
terials are often less sustainable and require extraction
of raw, non-renewable materials. High levels of energy
are involved in production, and the new materials may
also have an inherently short lifespan.
The sustainable nature of historic building materials
is best illustrated by a window: older windows were
built with well seasoned wood from durable, weather
resistant old growth forests. A historic window can be
repaired by re-glazing as well as patching and splicing
the wood elements. Many contemporary windows
cannot be repaired and must be replaced entirely.
Repairing, weather-stripping and insulating an original
window is generally as energy efficient and much less
expensive than replacement.
Landfill Impacts
According to the Environmental Protection Agency,
building debris constitutes around a third of all waste
generated in the country. The amount of waste is
reduced significantly when historic structures are
retained rather than demolished.
Economic Component of Sustainability
This component of sustainability relates to the
economic balance and health of the community. The
economic benefits of protecting historic resources
are well documented across the nation. These include
higher property values, job creation in rehabilitation
industries, and increased heritage tourism. Quality
of life improvements associated with living in historic
districts may also help communities recruit desirable
businesses.
Historic Rehabilitation Projects
Historic rehabilitation projects generate both direct
and indirect economic benefits. Direct benefits result
from the actual purchases of labor and materials, while
material manufacture and transport results in indirect
benefits. Preservation projects are generally more
labor intensive, with up to 70% of the total project
budget being spent on labor, as opposed to 50% when
compared to new construction. Expenditure on local
labor and materials benefits the community’s economy.
Historic Preservation and Sustainability
By preserving existing buildings and guiding
compatible redevelopment, the Design Stan-
dards promote the three key elements of com-
munity sustainability:
» Cultural/Social Sustainability. Preserv-
ing historic places and patterns promotes
cultural and social sustainability by supporting
everyday connections between residents and
the cultural heritage of the community. It also
enhances livability in the community.
Old Town Fort Collins | March 2014 9
DRAFT
The Development of Old Town Fort Collins
HISTORY
The opening of the Overland Stage Line between
Denver and Wyoming, in the early 1860s, necessitated
the construction of military forts to protect coaches
and immigrant trains from the threat of Indian attacks.
Entering the Cache La Poudre River Valley in 1862,
the 9th Kansas Volunteer Cavalry set up camp in the
vicinity of Laporte, Colorado. In 1864, due to severe
flooding of the Cache La Poudre and a series of military
command changes, the outpost, known as Camp Col-
lins, was moved to the area just southeast of the old
Fort Collins Power Plant.
The founding of the military post attracted citizens
wishing to open mercantile establishments and thereby
capitalize on trading with the nearby soldiers. Joseph
Mason was the first to obtain permission from the War
Department to build a store on the four-mile-square
military reservation. His structure was erected in 1865
on land that later became the Linden/Jefferson inter-
section. Called “Old Grout,” it served as a settler’s
store, church, post office, community center, and later
as the county offices and courthouse. Old Town claims
the site as the foundation for the City of Fort Collins.
Two other notable structures built in the area include
Auntie Stone’s cabin/hotel and a flour mill.
The establishment of this commercial district neces-
sitated the platting of the town’s first streets. In 1867-
1868, Jack Dow and Norman H. Meldrum surveyed the
area and set up streets that ran parallel to the major
environmental landmark, the Cache La Poudre River.
However, the influx of proprietors to Fort Collins,
and specifically the Old Town area, was certainly not a
stampede because when the fort closed in 1866, there
were scarcely a dozen civilians in town. The subsequent
departure of the soldiers put the town’s future in ques-
tion. The town and its business district languished until
the mid-1870s.
In retrospect, the prosperity of the town was assured
in an incident, called by Ansel Watrous in his History
of Larimer County, “perhaps the most notable event in
the early history of Fort Collins.” In the fall of 1872 the
agricultural colony was established.
General R. A. Cameron, originator of the Union Colo-
ny in Greeley, spearheaded the drive for Fort Collins’s
Agricultural Colony. The purpose of the new commune
was for it to be the crop-raising group for the settlers
at the Union Colony. Working with the earlier settlers
of Fort Collins, the officers of the new colony organized
the Larimer County Land Improvement Company. The
goal of the company was to encourage settlement of
the Fort Collins area. Within two months of their
arrival, the company had acquired enough land for
their surveyor to come in and plat new city streets.
For this job they chose a young New Yorker, Franklin
C. Avery, who had also platted the Union Colony. Mr.
Avery, utilizing the latest techniques in city planning,
laid the streets according to the cardinal points of the
10 Introduction
DRAFT
The decades of the 1880s and nineties saw the addition
of ornately decorated buildings like the Miller Block and
the Linden Hotel. Other distinctive buildings, like the
City Hall /Fire Station, added uniqueness to this area.
In 1887 electric lights and the town’s first telephone
enhanced Old Town’s status as the mercantile center
for Fort Collins. In 1897 the Avery Building provided
the link between Old Town and New Town. An early
competition developed between the business people in
Old Town and those with businesses near the intersec-
tion of College and Mountain. The new Avery Building
was a bridge that joined these two shopping areas
together. But the competition between the two areas
was to remain strong throughout the next century.
The new century, however, brought other problems
to Old Town. The Post Office, with its accompanying
pedestrian traffic and long an institution in one building
or another in the triangle, moved to the corner of Oak
and College. Mr. Avery crossed Mountain Avenue to
build yet another structure for his rapidly expanding
First National Bank.
By the 1900s Fort Collins was the well-settled home
of Colorado’s first land-grant college, the possessor of
a notable in-town railway transit system, and a very
popular spot in northern Colorado for urbanite and
farmer alike. On the direct railroad line between Den-
ver and Cheyenne, the passenger depot on Jefferson
Street in Old Town welcomed contented old-timers
of the community and diverse newcomers: academic,
agricultural, and financial. Fort Collins’ residents were
served well by Old Town, whose offerings ranged from
commodities and services found in eastern cities to
items more commonly located in agricultural com-
munities. These ranged from hotel accommodations,
banks and restaurants to hardware stores, feed, coal
and hay shops.
1889 Bird’s Eye view of Old Town
Miller Block (1889)
Linden Hotel (1908)
Old Town (1900)
Old Town Fort Collins | March 2014 11
DRAFT
The major retail businesses left the interior of the
triangle to locate along College Avenue frontage in
the early 1920s in response to the advent of an auto-
oriented population. Other, smaller businesses soon
thought it was more advantageous to move along
College Avenue.
After World War II the area was beginning to show
signs of aging and decay. During the 1950s and 1960s,
Old Town became home to social services organiza-
tions, automobile maintenance facilities, and some
limited retail. It also housed a collection of taverns and
some low-cost housing.
Revitalization began in the 1980s, with individual inves-
tors who saw opportunities in rehabilitating the historic
structures in the area. The Secretary of the Interior
listed the Old Town Historic District in the National
Register in 1978. This included all of the land area that
was later (1979) designated as the local historic district,
but also extended farther north to include the original
fort site. This made federal income tax credits available
for the certified rehabilitation of historic structures
in the area. With the city’s designation of the local
historic district in 1979, a formal design review process
was established to assure that historic buildings would
be preserved and that new construction would be
compatible with the historic context.
Individual investment efforts attracted more invest-
ment, and in 1985 Old Town Associates proposed a
redevelopment plan that included rehabilitation of
several historic buildings, erection of new infill build-
ings and construction of a pedestrian area for a portion
of Linden Street. Revitalization continued through
the turn of the twenty-first century, with substantial
participation of the City of Fort Collins and the Down-
town Development Authority. By 2013, the Old Town
Historic District was well-established as a center for
dining, retail and entertainment as well as housing and
professional offices.
Fort Collins’ Old Town is a reminder of its early
pioneer settlement. It was established by people who
purchased lands from a real estate company in order to
ward off the loneliness of the prairies, to profit by the
experience and expertise of their new neighbors, and
to furnish their families with social amenities that were
long in coming to communities situated farther east on
the Great Plains. Old Town demonstrates how these
people settled a new area and used local materials to
decorate it with styles current in the East, creating a
substantial, as well as unique, latter nineteenth-century
American community.
HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
Old Town retains many framework elements from its
early history but other features have changed. The fact
that it has remained dynamic is a part of its heritage.
For this reason, remaining resources which help to
interpret that span of human occupation and use are
valued.
While a row of historic buildings may be easily un-
12 Introduction
DRAFT
Circa 1920’s image of Old Town Fort Collins Historic District. Streets that run at an angle to the standard grid pattern of the rest of town give the Old Town Historic
District a distinct triangular shape that is clearly visible. The River District is visible in this image as well. (Aerial image looking south east.)
Jefferson ST
Linden ST
Mountain AVE
Walnut ST
North College AVE
Pine ST
1
USING THE DESIGN STANDARDS
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 15
Design Review System
The Landmarks Preservation Commission and City
staff shall take these factors into consideration when
reviewing proposed work:
› The significance of the property
› The context, with respect to other historic
properties
› The location of any key, character-defining
features
› The condition of those features
› The landmark status
› Eligibility status
In addition, there are many cases in which the stan-
dards state that one particular solution is preferred,
such as for the replacement of a damaged or missing
feature, but the text further notes that some alterna-
tives may be considered if the preferred approach is
not feasible. In determining such feasibility, the city will
also consider:
› The reasonable availability of the preferred
material
› The skill required to execute the preferred
approach
› The quality, appearance and character of
alternative solutions, such as new materials.
TERMS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE
When applying design standards, the City has the abil-
ity to balance a combination of objectives and intent
statements that appear throughout the document, in
the interest of helping to achieve the most appropriate
design for each project. Because of this, and the fact
that the design standards are also written to serve
an educational role as well as a regulatory one, the
language sometimes appears more conversational than
that in the body of the City Code. To clarify how
some terms are used, these definitions shall apply:
Standard
In this document the term “standard” is a criterion
with which the City will require compliance when it is
found applicable to the specific “land-use activity.”
Shall
Where the term “shall” is used, compliance is specifi-
cally required to the “maximum extent feasible,” when
the statement is applicable to the proposed “land-use
activity.” “Maximum extent feasible” shall mean that no
feasible and prudent alternative exists, and all possible
efforts to comply with the regulation or minimize po-
tential harm or adverse impacts have been undertaken.
Should
The term “should” is frequently used in the standards.
This indicates that compliance is specifically required
to the “extent reasonably feasible”, except in condi-
tions in which the city finds that the standard is not
applicable, or that an alternative means of meeting
the intent of the standards is acceptable. In this sense,
“should” means “shall,” but only to the extent reason-
ably feasible. ‘Extent reasonably feasible’ shall mean
that, under the circumstances, reasonable efforts have
16Standards Using the Design
DRAFT
Where the Design Standards Apply
The design standards apply to all properties within the Old Town Historic District. They also apply to Local Landmark Eligible properties and Local Landmark properties
within the River District. These areas and properties are identified on the map below.
North
NTS
Map Key
National Register District
Old Town Historic District
River District
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 17
Design Standards Organization
DESIGN REVIEW TRACKS
The design standards chapters are grouped into three
“tracks” for purposes of design review. Staff will deter-
mine which track a project will follow. (See the chart on
the following page.) These are:
› Preservation Track
› New Building Track
› Other Improvements Track
Follow these steps to get started:
Step 1 What Type of Improvement?
Determine the nature of the improvements that are
planned. There are three categories:
Existing Building
If improvements are planned to an existing building,
determine if it has historic significance or not. This will
influence which review track applies.
New Building
Will the planned improvements include construction
of a new building? If so, then the “New Construction
Track” applies. This includes a new structure to be
erected on a vacant lot; adding a new structure to a
lot with an existing building on it; or providing an addi-
tion to an existing noncontributing building where one
already exists.
Other Work
Site improvements, signs and other miscellaneous
projects follow this third track.
Step 2 What Type of Existing Building?
All existing structures in the Old Town Historic District
are classified with respect to their historic significance,
using criteria established by the National Park Service.
The city will work with the property owner to confirm
the status of historic significance. Two classifications
are used:
Contributing Property
A “contributing” property is one determined to be
historically significant. It is so because it was present
during the period of significance and possesses suf-
ficient integrity to convey its history, or is capable of
yielding important information about that period.
Note that some properties may have experienced
some degree of alteration from their historic designs.
These alterations may include window replacement,
cornice removal, a porch enclosure or covering of
a building’s historic materials. Nonetheless, these
altered properties retain sufficient building fabric to
still be considered contributors. For all contributing
properties, the Preservation Track shall apply.
Noncontributing Property
The classification of “noncontributing” applies to
existing buildings that do not possess sufficient and/
or exterior integrity necessary for designation, and
are considered noncontributing to a district. The New
Construction Track applies to these properties, except
as noted below.
Noncontributing, but Restorable
In some cases, an older noncontributing property
18Standards Using the Design
DRAFT
WHICH TRACK APPLIES?
The standards are organized into groups of chapters that represent “tracks” for
different types of improvements. This chart defines the track that will apply to
a specific proposal.
New
Building
Existing
Building
Step 1
Restorable
Non-
Applicable
Step 2
Noncontributing
Other
Track
Other
New Bldg.
Track
Contributing Preservation
Track
WHICH CHAPTERS APPLY?
Use this chart to determine which chapters of the design standards apply to a
proposed improvement project. Some projects will include work in more than
one track, in this case a combination of chapters will apply.
TYPE OF WORK
SECTION TO USE:
Introduction
I. Using the Design
Standards
II. Planning a Preservation
Project
III. Design Standards for
the Treatment of Historic
Resources
IV. Design Standards for
All Properties
V. Design Standards for
New Construction
VI. Design Standards for
Signs
Preservation
Track
Rehabilitate a
contributing
property
4 4 4 4 4 (1) (1)
Restore a
noncontributing
property
4 4 4 4 4 (1) (1)
New
Building
Track
Improve a
noncontributing
property
4 4 4 4 (1)
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 19
Permitted and Prohibited
Solutions
In many cases, images and dia-
grams in the historic preservation
standards are marked to indicate
whether they represent permitted
or prohibited solutions
4
A check mark
indicates permitted
solutions.
8
An X mark indicates
solutions that are
prohibited.
DESIGN STANDARDS FORMAT
The historic preservation standards are presented in a standardized format as illustrated below. Each of the components is used
by the city to determine compliance. Additional features that appear on a typical page of the historic preservation standards are
summarized at right.
A Windows Key
A Design Topic Heading
B
Intent Statement: This explains
the desired outcome for the specific
design element and provides a basis
for the design standards that follow.
C
Design Standard: This describes
a desired outcome related to the
intent statement.
D
Additional Information: This
provides a bullet list of examples of
how, or how not to, comply with the
standard.
E
Illustration(s): These provide
photos and/or diagrams to illustrate
related conditions or possible ap-
proaches. They may illustrate per-
mitted or prohibited solutions as
described at right.
B
Historic windows help convey the significance of historic structures,
and shall be preserved. They can be repaired by re-glazing and patching
and splicing elements such as muntins, the frame, sill and casing. Repair
and weatherization also is more energy efficient, and less expensive
than replacement. If an original window cannot be repaired, new
replacement windows shall be in character with the historic building.
C 1.1 Maintain and repair historic windows.
D
» Preserve historic window features including the frame, sash, muntins,
mullions, glazing, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operation and groupings
of windows.
» Repair and maintain windows regularly, including trim, glazing putty and
glass panes.
» Repair, rather than replace, frames and sashes.
» Restore altered window openings to their historic configuration.
20Standards Using the Design
DRAFT
2
PLANNING A PRESERVATION PROJECT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 23
DRAFT
What Does Historic Preservation Mean?
Historic preservation means keeping historic proper-
ties and places in active use while accommodating
appropriate improvements to sustain their viability
and character. It also means keeping historic resources
for the benefit of future generations. That is, while
maintaining properties in active use is the immediate
objective, this is in part a means of assuring that these
resources will be available for others to enjoy in the
future.
Historic preservation does not mean necessarily freez-
ing properties or districts in time. Historic preserva-
tion seeks to manage change to preserve authenticity
and historic craftsmanship while meeting existing and
future needs.
This section summarizes important steps and ap-
proaches to consider when planning a preservation
project
› Planning a Preservation Project
› Case Studies
› Designing in Context
› Historic Building Styles
When planning a preservation project, it is important
to determine historic significance, assess integrity and
determine program requirements prior to outlining a
treatment strategy that will inform the overall project
scope.
ACCEPTED TREATMENTS FOR HISTORIC
RESOURCES
The following list describes permitted treatments
for historic resources that may be considered when
planning a preservation project. Much of the language
addresses buildings; however, sites, objects and struc-
tures are also relevant.
Preservation
“Preservation” is the act of applying measures to sustain
the existing form, integrity and material of a building.
Work focuses on keeping a property in good work-
ing condition with proactive maintenance. While the
term “preservation” is used broadly to mean keeping
a historic property’s significant features, it is also used
in this more specific, technical form in this document.
Restoration
“Restoration” is the act or process of accurately de-
picting the form, features and character of a property
as it appeared in a particular time period. It may require
the removal of features from outside the restoration
period. This may apply to an entire building, or to
restoring a particular missing feature.
Reconstruction
“Reconstruction” is the act or process of depicting,
by means of new construction, the form, features and
detailing of a non-surviving site, landscape, building,
structure or object for the purpose of replicating its
appearance at a specific time and in its historic location.
This has limited application, in terms of an entire build-
ing, but may apply to a missing feature on a building.
Rehabilitation
24Project Planning a Preservation
DRAFT
STEPS TO CONSIDER FOR A SUCCESSFUL PRESERVATION PROJECT.
Follow the steps below when planning a preservation project.
Step 1. Review reasons for significance: The reasons for significance will
influence the degree of rigor with which the standards are applied, because it
affects which features will be determined to be key to preserve. Identifying the
building’s period of significance is an important first step.
Step 2. Identify key features: A historic property has integrity. It has a suf-
ficient percentage of key character-defining features and characteristics from its
period of significance which remain intact.
Step 3. Identify program requirements for the desired project: The
functional requirements for the property drive the work to be considered. If the
existing use will be maintained, then preservation will be the focus. If changes in
use are planned, then some degree of compatible alterations may be needed.
Step 4. Implement a treatment strategy: A permitted
treatment strategy will emerge once historic significance, integrity and program
requirements have been determined. A preservation project may include a range of
activities, such as maintenance of existing historic elements, repair of deteriorated
materials, the replacement of missing features and construction of a new addition.
Planning a Preservation Project
PROHIBITED TREATMENTS
The following approaches are not permitted for his-
torically significant properties.
Remodeling
This is the process of changing the historic design
of a building. The appearance is altered by removing
historic details and by adding new features that are out
of character with historic materials. Remodeling of a
historic structure is prohibited.
Deconstruction
“Deconstruction” is a process of dismantling a building
such that the individual material components and ar-
chitectural details remain intact. This may be proposed
when a building is to be relocated or when the materi-
als are to be reused in other building projects. Decon-
struction may be a more environmentally responsible
alternative to conventional demolition. However, it is
still prohibited for a building of historic significance.
Demolition
Any act or process that destroys, in part or whole, a
structure, building or site is considered “demolition.”
This is prohibited for any historic building.
A successful preservation project shall consider the
significance of the historic resource, its key features,
and the project’s program requirements. When alter-
ing a historic building, it is also important to consider
preservation and repair prior to contemplating any re-
placement. The tables and diagrams below and on the
following pages provide overall guidance for planning a
preservation project.
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 25
DRAFT
PREFERRED SEQUENCE OF ACTIONS
Selecting an appropriate treatment for a character-defining feature is important.
The method that requires the least intervention is always preferred. By following
this tenet, the highest degree of integrity will be maintained. The following treat-
ment options appear in order of preference. When making a selection, follow this
sequence:
Step 1. Preserve: If a feature is intact and in good condition, maintain it as such.
Step 2. Repair: If the feature is deteriorated or damaged, repair it to its historic
condition.
Step 3. Replace: If it is not feasible to repair the feature, then replace it in kind,
(e.g., materials, detail, finish). Replace only that portion which is beyond repair.
Step 4. Reconstruct: If the feature is missing entirely, reconstruct it from ap-
propriate evidence. If a portion of a feature is missing, it can also be reconstructed.
Step 5. Compatible Alterations: If a new feature (one that did not exist previ-
ously) or an addition is necessary, design it in such a way as to minimize the impact
on historic features. It is also important to distinguish a new feature on a historic
building from the historic features, even if in subtle ways.
For More Information
For more information regarding the treat-
ments for a historic resource please visit the
National Park Service web site:
http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/standguide/index.
htm
If a feature is deteriorated or
damaged, repairing it to its his-
toric condition is preferred.
26Project Planning a Preservation
DRAFT
A
C B or
D
E
WHICH AREAS ARE THE MOST SENSITIVE TO PRESERVE?
For most historic resources in the Old Town Historic District, the front wall is the most important to preserve intact. Alterations are rarely permitted. Many side
walls are also important to preserve where they are highly visible from the street. By contrast, portions of a side wall not as visible may be less sensitive to change.
The rear wall is sometimes the least important (excepting free-standing, individual landmarks, those along improved alleys or certain civic and industrial buildings), and
alterations can occur more easily without causing negative effects to the historic significance of the property.
Location A. Primary
Façade: Preservation
and repair of features in
place is the priority. This is
especially important at the
street level and in locations
where the feature is highly
visible.
Location B. A Second-
ary Wall, Which
Is Highly Visible: A
compatible replacement
or alteration is preferred.
Some flexibility in treat-
ment may be considered.
Location C. A Second-
ary Wall, Which Is Not
Highly Visible: Preserva-
tion is still preferred;
however, a compatible
replacement or alteration
may be acceptable when it
is not visible to the public.
More flexibility in treat-
ment may be considered.
Location D. Highly
Visible Rear Wall:
This applies to many
cultural buildings of historic
significance, such as civic
buildings, improved alleys
and other landmarks that
are viewed “in the round”
or border a public space
such as a park. Preservation
and repair in place is the
priority.
Location E. A Rear
Wall That Is Not Highly
Visible: A compatible
replacement or alteration
may be acceptable when
it is not visible to the
public. A higher level of
flexibility in treatment may
be considered.
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 27
DRAFT
ALTERED HISTORIC
COMMERCIAL FACADE
The starting condition.
Missing Cornice
Historic Windows
Altered Storefront
DEVELOPING A PRESERVATION STRATEGY
The standards discuss a range preservation options,
including reconstruction and replacement of features
in various ways. When applied to a building that is al-
ready altered, which would be the best approach? This
diagram outlines the approaches to consider in making
that decision.
When should I use this
treatment?
» There is substantial
alteration, making other
options difficult.
» There is less information
about the historic design.
» The context (the block
lacks a substantial number
of historic structures that
retain integrity) has more
variety.
When should I use this
treatment?
» The building is part of the
fabric of the district.
» There is less information
available about the
historic design.
» A phased project is
planned.
When should I use this
treatment?
» The building is highly
significant.
» There is good historical
information about the
design.
» The needed materials and
craftsmen are available.
» The context has many
intact historic buildings.
Approach 3:
Rehabilitation
(contemporary
interpretation)
Approach 1:
Accurate Restoration
4
Approach 2:
Rehabilitation (simplified
historic interpretation)
4 4
28Project Planning a Preservation
DRAFT
Historic building remodel. Interim improvements to the building included
removing the canopy, providing a new sign and
painting the stucco covering.
A later rehabilitation effort included remov-
ing the stucco, reconstructing the cornice and
installing a new storefront system.
4 4
PHASING PRESERVATION PROJECTS
In some cases, a property owner may wish to make
interim improvements, rather than execute a complete
rehabilitation of a historic property. This work shall be
planned such that it establishes a foundation for future
improvements that will further assure continued use
of the property and retain its historic significance. For
example, a simplified cornice element may be installed
on a commercial storefront, in lieu of reconstructing
the historic design, with the intent that an accurate
reconstruction would occur later.
Plan interim improvements to retain
opportunities for future rehabilitation
work that will enhance the integrity of
a historic property.
› Preserve key character-defining features while
making interim improvements.
› Avoid interim improvements that would
foreclose opportunities for more extensive
rehabilitation in the future.
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 29
DRAFT
Case studies
CASE STUDIES
Numerous rehabilitation projects have been suc-
cessfully completed since the adoption of the design
standards. Some examples appear in this section. They
include “before and after” pairings. Some of these in-
clude photographs from the early years when this was
the center of commerce. Then, images from the 1970s
and 1980s document interim conditions, when many
buildings had been altered. Finally, more recent photo-
graphs, generally from 2013, illustrate the progressive
rehabilitation and continuing revitalization of the area.
These case studies demonstrate the benefits of the
on-going stewardship of the historic resources in the
district, and of the positive effects that local historic
district designation has had. They further demonstrate
successful solutions for many of the design topics ad-
dressed in this standards document.
WALNUT STREET BLOCK
In the upper photos (ca.
1981), storefronts have been
altered, upper story windows
have been reduced in size and
new materials obscure historic
masonry.
In the lower photo, windows
and storefronts are restored,
and historic brick facades are
revealed.
30Project Planning a Preservation
DRAFT
AVERY BLOCK
An early image of the Avery Block exhibits a distinctive line of ground level storefronts. In 1981, storefronts had been altered, and the distinctive mid-belt cornice line was
obscured.
In 2013, a reconstructed cornice reestablished a distinctive hori-
zontal feature, and awning once more reflect the dimensions of
each storefront bay.
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 31
DRAFT
ANTLERS BLOCK
An early view of the Antlers hotel and associated buildings in its block
demonstrates a variety in building heights, but a sense of continuity is
established by the horizontal alignment of storefront level moldings and
second story cornices.
In 1981, many historic features remain, but minor alterations have
occurred, and some details are obscured by monochromatic paint
schemes.
Farther down the block, a more recent building is out of character with
the two-story emphasis seen in most buildings in the block.
After rehabilitation (photo: 2013), buildings have been adapted to new
uses while the key, character-defining features that contribute to their
historic significance have been preserved.
32Project Planning a Preservation
DRAFT
LINDEN STREET BLOCK, WEST SIDE
The northern end of the Linden Street block in 1980
appears with several storefronts missing, and a mono-
chromatic paint scheme diminishes one’s perception of
the distinctive architectural details.
A close-up view of the storefront at
252 Linden, in 1980 shows the miss-
ing storefront.
After rehabilitation in the mid-1980s, many storefronts have
been reconstructed. Architectural details are highlighted with
contrasting color schemes. The left most storefront remains
altered, but other features on this facade have been pre-
served.
In 2013, awnings and signs have been added, and color schemes
have changed. This demonstrates the ongoing adaptive use of these
properties, while preserving their historic significance.
In the mid-1980s, after the store-
front has been reconstructed.
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 33
DRAFT
BLACKS GLASS ROW
Ca. 1980, Black’s Glass, with a missing mid-belt molding, and historic storefront altered. The transom also is covered, changing the
proportions of the ground level.
In 2013, storefronts and the
midbelt molding are recon-
structed.
34Project Planning a Preservation
DRAFT
OLD FIRE STATION AND CITY HALL
The old city hall and fire station occupied two buildings side-
by-side on Walnut Street. A distinctive arch identified the door
for fire engines.
In 1980, the two buildings appear as one metal
clad facade. The storefront for city hall has
been removed, and the doorway for fire engines
has been widened.
At the beginning of rehabilitation in the early
1980s, damage to the historic masonry is vis-
ible. The hose tower also is missing.
Lower left:
Shortly after rehabilitation, reconstructed cornices and storefront
are visible. A more contemporary storefront, using dark metal
components, is used in the historic fire engine entry, to signify
that this is a later alteration. The tower also is reconstructed.
Lower right:
In 2012, awnings and signs have changed, but the key features
of the building remain intact, demonstrating the continuing use
of this historic resource.
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 35
DRAFT
J.L.HOHNSTEIN BLOCK
An early view of the Hohnstein
block documents the tall first floor
and the distinctive masonry arch
details on the upper floor.
In 1980, metal cladding obscures most of the key
character-defining features of the building front.
In the early 1980s, the initial reha-
bilitation revealed key features of
the facade.
Almost 30 years later, in 2013, the building continues to be in active service. An outdoor dining area
reflects a new use, but is designed to remain visually subordinate to the historic building. Note the
historic sign on the side wall.
36Project Planning a Preservation
DRAFT
MILLER BLOCK
In 1979, wood paneling obscures historic storefronts.
Shortly after construction of the plaza in Old Town Square, (ca. 1985), new awnings define
the dimensions of individual storefront bays.
In 2013, key features remain preserved. Different awning
colors distinguish individual businesses while retaining the
overall visual continuity of the building.
In this early photo, the Miller building stands as a signature building at Linden and Walnut
streets; diagonally from the Linden Hotel.
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 37
DRAFT
In this early photo, the Linden Hotel stands as the signature
building at the corner of Linden and Walnut Streets
In 1980s, historic masonry is covered with a cementatious
plaster and the storefronts have been altered. Some upper
story windows have been blocked up.
Again in the early 1980s, the Linden in an altered state. The Sal-
vation Army and Reed and Dauth buildings are to the right.
In 2013, the Linden is
once more the icon for
Old Town Fort Collins.
THE LINDEN HOTEL
38Project Planning a Preservation
DRAFT
Designing in Context
District-wide
Block
Immediate
Surroundings
A fundamental principle of the design standards is that
projects shall be planned to be compatible with the
context. This is especially relevant to the design of an
addition or new building.
Levels of Context Consideration
Context shall be considered at these levels:
› District-wide – in terms of the qualitative
features, such as the orientation of the street,
alley, street wall, buildings and features
› The block – which focuses on the collection of
buildings, sites and structures in the area
› Immediate surroundings – properties adjacent
to, facing or overlooking a specific site
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 39
DRAFT
Historic Architectural Styles
Many of the building styles found within the Old Town
Historic District are noted on the Colorado History
web site. These style descriptions will assist the city
in determining which features are key to a property’s
significance. Note that styles are rarely “pure” in
form, and a wide range exists within individual styles.
The majority of the buildings styles found in the Old
Town Historic District are shown here.
Early Twentieth - Century Commercial, single storefront.
Nineteenth-Century Commercial, Richardsonian Romanesque
architectural style
Nineteenth-Century Commercial, Italianate architectural style
that is fifty feet or more with multiple entrances.
Historic Architectural Styles
Information about Fort Collins’s historic architec-
tural styles is available from a number of sources,
including:
› City of Fort Collins, Central Business District
Development and Residential Architecture,
Historic Contexts, November 1992
› A Cultural Resources Inventory of The Old Fort
Site, Fort Collins, Colorado, June 2002
› See History Colorado web link at:
http://www.historycolorado.org/archaeologists/
colorados-historic-architecture-engineering-web-
guide
See also the following reference book:
› What Style is it? A Guide to American
Architecture. John C. Poppeliers, S. Allen
Chambers, Jr., Nancy B Schwartz. Historic
Building Survey, National Park Service, US
Department of the Interior. 1983
40Project Planning a Preservation
DRAFT
The following design principles apply to all historic
properties and will be used when evaluating the
appropriateness of related work:
Respect the historic character of a
property.
» The basic form and materials of a building, as well
as architectural details, are a part of the historic
character.
» Don’t try to change the style of a historic resource
or make it look older than its actual age.
» Confusing the character by mixing elements of
different styles or periods can adversely affect the
historic significance of the property.
Seek uses that are compatible with the
historic character of the property.
» Converting a building to a new use different from
the historic use is considered to be an “adaptive
reuse,” and is a sound strategy for keeping an
old building in service. For example, converting a
residential structure to offices is an adaptive use.
A good adaptive use project retains the historic
character of the building while accommodating a
new function.
» Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide
a compatible use for the building that will require
minimal alteration to the building and its site.
» Changes in use requiring the least alteration to
significant elements are preferred. In most cases
designs can be developed that respect the historic
integrity of the building while also accommodating
new functions.
Protect and maintain signif icant features
and stylistic elements.
» Distinctive stylistic features and other examples
of skilled craftsmanship shall be preserved. The
best preservation procedure is to maintain historic
features from the outset to prevent the need for
repair later. Appropriate maintenance includes
rust removal, caulking and repainting.
» These features shall not be removed.
Repair deteriorated historic features
and replace only those elements that
cannot be repaired.
» Upgrade existing materials, using recognized
preservation methods. If disassembly is necessary
for repair or restoration, use methods that
minimize damage to historic materials and facilitate
reassembly.
Overarching Preservation Principles
Nineteenth-Century Commercial, single storefront
Protect and maintain significant features and stylistic elements.
DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE
TREATMENT OF HISTORIC RESOURCES
3
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 43
Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic Resources
Architectural details help convey the significance
of historic properties, and shall be preserved.
The method of preservation that requires the
least intervention is preferred.
For More Information
See web link to Preservation Brief 17:
Architectural Character - Identifying the
Visual Aspects of Historic Buildings as
an Aid to Preserving Character.
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-
preserve/briefs/17-architectural-
character.htm
The City seeks to preserve the historic integrity of
properties of historic significance in the Old Town
Historic District. This means employing best
practices in property stewardship to maintain the key
character-defining features of individual historic
resources, as well as maintaining the context in which
they exist.
This section provides standards for the treatment of
historic properties in Old Town. It focuses on the
rehabilitation and maintenance of character-defining
features of each individual contributing property as
well as the district as a whole.
The standards translate the general principles for
historic preservation outlined in the preceding chapter
to the treatment of individual building features and
components that are found typically in the district. The
standards in this section do not apply to new construc-
tion.
ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS
Architectural details help convey the historic and
architectural significance of historic properties, and
shall be preserved. The method of preservation that
requires the least intervention is preferred.
3.1 Maintain significant architectural
details.
› Retain and treat exterior stylistic features and
examples of skilled craftsmanship with sensitiv-
ity.
› Employ preventive maintenance measures such
as rust removal, caulking and repainting.
44Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
Historic Architectural Details
Typical historic architectural details to preserve
include:
› Cornices and eaves
› Moldings and brackets
› Windows and doors and surrounds
› Modillions and other surface ornamenta-
tion
› Columns
› Storefronts
3.2 Repair , rather than replace,
significant architectural details if
they are damaged.
› Do not remove or alter distinctive architec-
tural details that are in good condition or
that can be repaired.
› Document the location of a historic feature that
must be removed to be repaired so it may be
repositioned accurately.
› Patch, piece-in, splice, consolidate or otherwise
upgrade deteriorated features using recognized
preservation methods.
› Minimize damage to historic architectural de-
tails when repairs are necessary.
› Protect significant features that are adjacent to
the area being worked on.
Retain and treat exterior stylistic features and examples of
skilled craftsmanship with sensitivity.
Maintain significant
architectural details,
including: projecting
cornices, masonry
patterns, decorative
moldings, double-hung
wood windows and
other decorative fea-
tures.
4
4
Document the location of a
historic feature that must be
removed and repaired so it
may be repositioned accu-
rately.
4
Patch, piece-in, splice, con-
solidate or otherwise upgrade
deteriorated features using
recognized preservation meth-
ods.
4
For More Information
See web link to Preservation Brief 27: The Mainte-
nance and Repair of Architectural Cast Iron
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/
briefs/27-cast-iron.htm
and
See web link to Preservation Brief 47: Maintaining the
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 45
3.3 Reconstruct an architectural feature
accurately if it cannot be repaired.
› Use a design that is substantiated by physical or
pictorial evidence to avoid creating a misrepre-
sentation of the building’s history.
› Use the same kind of material as the historic
detail. However, an alternative material may be
considered if it:
› Has proven durability
› Has a size, shape, texture and finish that
conveys the visual appearance of the his-
toric feature.
› Is located in a place that is remote from
view or direct physical contact
› Avoid adding architectural details that were
not part of the historic structure. For example,
decorative millwork shall not be added to a
building if it was not a historic feature as doing
so would convey a false history.
The rehabilitation of the Reed and Darth building included reconstruction of missing features. Using
historic photographs, a cornice was constructed to match the historic in character. An alternative
material (wood) was used instead of the historic metal.
Before rehabilitation (ca. 1980) During rehabilitation (ca. 1982)
The rehabilitated Reed and Darth building (2013)
During rehabilitation (ca. 1982)
4
46Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
These buildings demonstrate a successful reconstruction of a missing cornice.
See the image above for the historic condition.
4
Use historic photos as a source for reconstructing a missing
detail.
4
Interim image of missing cornice.
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 47
MATERIALS AND FINISHES
Historic materials shall be preserved in place. If the
material is damaged, limited replacement to match
the historic should be considered. Historic building
materials shall never be covered or subjected to harsh
cleaning treatments. Preserving historic building mate-
rials and limiting replacement to only pieces which are
deteriorated beyond repair also reduces the demand
for, and environmental impacts from, the production
of new materials and therefore supports the city’s
sustainability objectives.
3.4 Maintain historic building materials.
› Protect historic building materials from dete-
rioration (see “Maintaining Historic Materials”
at right for information on treating different
types of materials).
› Do not remove historic materials that are in
good condition.
› Use a low pressure water wash if cleaning is
permitted. Chemical cleaning may be consid-
ered if a test patch does not have a negative
effect on the historic fabric (test patch shall be
reviewed by city preservation department).
› Do not use harsh cleaning methods, that can
inhibit the function and/or appearance of the
historic material, such as sandblasting, which
can damage its protective coating.
Maintaining Historic Materials
Primary historic building
materials include masonry
(brick, mortar, stone, and
concrete), wood and metal.
These shall be preserved
and repaired.
4
Appropriate treatments to protect specific materi-
als from deterioration include:
Masonry
› Maintain the natural water-protective layer
(patina).
› Do not paint, unless it was painted historically
(this can seal in moisture, which may cause
extensive damage over time).
› Re-point deteriorated masonry mortar joints
with mortar that matches the strength, com-
position, color and texture of the historic
material.
Wood
› Maintain paint and other protective coatings
to retard deterioration and ultraviolet dam-
age.
› Provide proper drainage and ventilation.
Metal
› Maintain protective coatings, such as paint,
on exposed metals.
› Provide proper drainage.
Do not use harsh cleaning methods, such
as sandblasting, which can damage his-
48Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
3.5 Repair historic building materials
when needed.
› Repair deteriorated building materials by patch-
ing, piecing-in, consolidating, or otherwise
reinforcing the material.
› Replace only those materials that are deterio-
rated, and beyond reasonable repair.
3.6 Replace historic building materials
in kind.
› Use the same material as the historic material
to replace damaged building materials on a pri-
mary façade.
› Also use historic materials to replace damaged
building materials on a non-primary façade.
› Replace only the amount of material that is
beyond repair.
› Use only replacement materials that are similar
in scale, finish and character to the historic
material.
› Use only replacement materials with proven
durability.
› Do not replace building materials on the pri-
mary façade, such as masonry and wood siding,
with alternative or imitation materials, unless
no other option is available.
Repair deteriorated building materials, when needed.
4
Alternative or
replacement materi-
als shall match the
style and detail of
the historic fabric
and be durable in
the local climate,
such as these cast
concrete details
that replace missing
stone features.
4
For More Information
See web link to Preservation Brief 16: The Use of
Substitute Materials on Historic Building Exteriors.
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/
briefs/16-substitute-materials.htm
Typical Materials
Typical historic building materials used in Old Town
Fort Collins include:
» Masonry
› Brick
› Stone
› Terra Cotta
› Poured Concrete
› Pre-cast Concrete
» Wood
» Metal
› Cast iron,
› Copper
› Sheet metal
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 49
3.7 Preserve the visibility of historic
materials.
› Consider removing later covering materials that
have not achieved historic significance.
› Once a non-historic material is removed, repair
the historic, underlying material.
› Do not cover or obscure historic building ma-
terials.
› Do not add another layer of new material if a
property already has a non-historic building
material covering the historic material.
Consider removing later covering materials that have not achieved historic significance (left) to reveal the underlying historic materials
(right).
8 4
For More Information
See web link to Preservation Brief 1: Assessing
Cleaning and Water-Repellent Treatments for Historic
Masonry Buildings
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/1-
cleaning-water-repellent.htm
See web link to Preservation Brief 2: Repointing
Mortar Joints in Historic Masonry Buildings
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/2-
repoint-mortar-joints.htm
50Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
WINDOWS
Historic windows help convey the significance of
historic structures, and shall be preserved. They can
be repaired by re-glazing and patching and splicing
elements such as muntins, the frame, sill and casing.
Repair and weatherization also is often more energy
efficient, and less expensive than replacement. If a his-
toric window cannot be repaired, a new replacement
window shall be in character with the historic building.
3.8 Maintain and repair historic
windows.
› Preserve historic window features including
the frame, sash, muntins, mullions, glazing, sills,
heads, jambs, moldings, operation and group-
ings of windows.
› Repair and maintain windows regularly, includ-
ing trim, glazing putty and glass panes.
› Repair, rather than replace, frames and sashes.
› Restore altered window openings to their his-
toric configuration.
Historic Window Components
Window components include:
› Sash
› Frame
› Number of lights (panes)
› Shutters
› Security Devices (bars and screens)
› Insect screens
› Storm windows
4 4
4
Before rehabilitation: upper story windows in need of repair. After rehabilitation: repaired windows.
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 51
3.9 Replace a historic window with a
matching design if repair is not
feasible.
› Match the appearance of the historic window
design (i.e., if the historic is double-hung, use a
double-hung replacement window).
› Maintain the historic size, shape and number of
panes.
› Match the profile of the sash, muntin and its
components to the historic window, including
the depth of the sash, which may step back to
the plane of the glass in several increments.
› Use clear window glazing that conveys the vi-
sual appearance of historic glazing (transparent
low-e glass is preferred).
› Do not use vinyl and unfinished metals as win-
dow replacement materials.
› Do not use metallic or reflective window glaz-
ing.
› Do not reduce a historic opening to accom-
modate a smaller window or increase it to
accommodate a larger window.
4
Before rehabilitation: historic windows are missing. After rehabilitation: historic openings are restored.
52Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
Alternative Window Material
If it is not feasible to match the historic design and
materials of a window, then an alternative design
may be considered in the following locations:
› On a non-primary façade, accessory build-
ing or addition
› On a primary façade if no other option is
available
Alternative window designs shall:
› Match the general profile and details of the
historic window.
› Use materials that match the historic ap-
pearance in dimension, profile and finish.
Match the appearance of a historic
window design (i.e., if the historic
is double-hung, use a double-hung
replacement window, or a window
that appears to be double-hung).
Replace historic windows (top) with a matching design (bottom),
if repair is not feasible.
4
Do not reduce a historic opening to accommodate a smaller win-
dow or increase it to accommodate a larger window.
8
4
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 53
3.10 Use special care when replacing a
window on a primary façade.
› Give special attention to matching the historic
design and materials of windows located on the
façade.
› Also, match the historic design when replacing a
window located on a secondary wall.
3.11 Design a storm window to minimize
its visual impacts.
› If a window did not historically have a storm
window, place a new storm window internally
to avoid exterior visual impacts.
› Use storm windows designed to match the
historic window frame if placed externally.
› Use insect screens with painted wooden frames
where wood windows exist.
3.12 Restore a historic window opening
that has been altered.
› Restore a historic window opening that previ-
ously existed.
› Place a new window to fit within the historic
opening.
Place storm windows internally to
avoid exterior visual impacts (right).
Use storm window inserts designed
to match the historic frame if placed
externally (left).
4
Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening.
8 4
For More Information
See web link to Preservation Brief 9: The Repair of
Historic Wooden Windows
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/9-
wooden-windows.htm
See web link to window retrofit article from the
National Trust for Historic Preservation web site
http://www.preservationnation.org/who-we-are/
press-center/press-releases/2012/new-windows-
study.html
Web link to window treatments National Park
Service Tech Notes. Scroll down page to window
to secure links
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/tech-
notes.htm
54Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
3.13 When necessary, locate and design
a new window opening to preserve
the overall rhythm and arrangement
of windows on a secondary building
wall.
› Locate a new window opening to match the
general arrangement of historic windows in a
building wall.
› Design a new window opening to match historic
window proportions on the same façade.
3.14 Enhance the energy efficiency of
historic windows and doors.
› Make the best use of historic windows; keep
them in good repair and seal all the leaks.
› Maintain the glazing compound regularly.
Remove old putty with care.
› Place a storm window internally to avoid the
impact upon external appearance.
› Use storm windows designed to match the
historic window frame if placed externally.
Double-hung windows found in many historic structures
allow for transferring cool air in and warm air out during
the summer months.
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 55
DOORS AND ENTRIES
The design, materials and location of historic doors
and entries help establish the significance of a historic
structure and shall be preserved. When a new door
is needed, it shall be in character with the building,
especially when it is located on a primary wall.
3.15 Maintain a historic primary
entrance.
› Preserve historic and decorative features,
including door frames, sills, heads, jambs, mold-
ings, detailing, transoms and flanking sidelights.
› Do not alter the historic size and shape of a
historic door opening.
› Do not change the historic locations of door
openings on primary façades.
› Do not add a new door opening on a primary façade.
› Do not enclose transoms or sidelights.
3.16 Repair or replace a damaged door
to maintain its general historic
appearance.
› Use materials that appear similar to that of the
historic door.
› When replacing a historic door on a primary
façade, use a design that appears similar to the
historic door.
› When replacing a historic door on a non-
primary façade, consider an alternative design
that is in character.
Historic Door and Entry Components
Historic door and entry features include:
› Door Detailing
› Sills
› Surround
› Transoms
› Heads
› Threshold
› Moldings
› Jambs
› Landing (mosaic tiles)
› Flanking sidelights
› Hardware
Maintain a historic primary entrance design.
The design, materi-
als and location of
historic doors and
entries help establish
the significance of a
historic structure and
shall be preserved.
4
4
56Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
3.17 Locate and design a new door and
entry to preserve the historic façade
composition.
› Locate a new door to be consistent with the
historic architectural style of the structure,
especially if located on the primary façade.
› Design a new door or entry to match historic
door proportions.
Design a new door or entry to match historic door proportions.
4 4
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 57
COMMERCIAL STOREFRONTS
A historic commercial storefront is a key defining
feature of a historic commercial building and shall be
preserved. A historic storefront is usually framed by
masonry side walls and a horizontal cornice or lintel
above the storefront windows. The space within is
highly transparent, including large transom windows
over the display windows. A store entrance is usually
recessed behind the plane of the façade and the cornice
or lintel separates the storefront from upper floors.
Preserving significant historic storefronts and recon-
structing altered or missing storefront features is a key
goal. Researching archival materials such as historic
photos and building plans can be helpful in understand-
ing the role of the storefront and its relationship to
the street.
3.18 Maintain and repair a historic
commercial storefront.
› Maintain interest for pedestrians by maintaining
an active street level storefront.
› Preserve the storefront glass if it is intact.
› Repair storefront elements by patching, splic-
ing, consolidating or otherwise reinforcing the
historic materials.
› Avoid altering the size and shape of a storefront
opening.
› Do not use reflective, opaque or tinted glass.
› Do not remove or enclose a transom.
› Retain the relationship of the storefront to the
sidewalk.
3.19 Replace storefront features to
match historic features if necessary.
› Use traditional materials such as masonry and
wood.
› If using traditional materials is not feasible, use
compatible substitute materials that are similar
in scale, finish and character to the historic
material, and have proven durability in the local
climate.
› Use historical documentation to guide the
design of replacement features, or design
simplified versions of similar elements seen on
nearby historic properties, if no documentation
is available.
› Expose historic storefront elements that have
been covered by modern siding or other ma-
terials.
4
Before rehabilitation: historic storefront
components survive. (ca. 1980)
After the initial rehabilitation
storefront components are
retained. (ca. 1982)
Storefront components continue to be pre-
served. (2013)
For More Information
See web link to Preservation Brief 11: Rehabilitating
Historic Storefronts
58Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
3.20 Reconstruct a missing storefront
to match the character, scale and
materials of the historic.
› Use historical documentation to guide the
design of the reconstruction.
Traditional Commercial Storefront Features
Historic commercial storefronts typically feature a tall ground floor level while
upper stories have shorter floor-to-floor heights. The key character-defining
features of a commercial storefront are:
Molding or Lintel
Transom
Display Window
Bulkhead/Kickplate
Recessed Entry
Engaged Column or Pilaster
Contemporary Storefront Designs
When a historic storefront is largely missing, it
may be appropriate to design a replacement that
is a contemporary interpretation of a traditional
storefront. A contemporary replacement design
shall:
› Promote pedestrian interest and an active
street-level façade
› Use high-quality, durable materials that
are similar in type and scale to traditional
materials
› Be located within the historic structural
frame of sidewalls and lintel or cornice that
spaces the storefront opening
› Convey the characteristics of typical his-
toric storefronts
› Include traditional storefront elements
such as a bulkhead and transom
› Maintain the transparent character of the
display windows
› Provide a recessed entry
› Use a simple and relatively undecorated
design
› Relate to traditional elements of the façade
above
› Preserve early storefront alterations that
have become historically significant
3.21 A simplified or contemporary
interpretation of a traditional
storefront may be considered where
the historic storefront is missing
and no evidence of it exists.
› Where the historic is missing and no evidence
of the historic storefront exists, a new design
that uses traditional features of a storefront is
permitted.
› The new design shall continue to convey the
design character and materials of typical com-
mercial storefronts. This includes the transpar-
ent character of the glass.
› Use simple color combinations (see “Permitted
Color Combinations for a Commercial Store-
front” on page 61 for more information).
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 59
HISTORIC ROOFS
Many roofs in the Old Town Historic District are flat and
are concealed from view, where changes may not affect
the integrity of the structure. For those that are visible,
the form, shape and significant materials of a historic roof
help define the character of a historic structure as it is
perceived from the public way and shall be preserved.
3.22 Preserve the historic roofline on a
historic structure.
› Maintain the perceived line and orientation of
the roof as seen from the street.
3.23 Maintain and repair historic roof
materials.
› Preserve decorative elements, including crests
and chimneys.
› Retain and repair roof detailing, including gut-
ters and downspouts.
EXPOSED HISTORIC FOUNDATIONS
A historic building foundation contributes to the charac-
ter of a historic structure and shall be preserved.
Altering or replacing historic foundation walls is dis-
couraged. However, it may also be necessary to replace
historic foundation walls with compatible new materials
where the historic foundation is deteriorated beyond
repair.
3.24 Maintain and repair a historic
foundation.
› Re-point historic masonry foundations to match
the historic design.
› Design landscaping and other site features to
keep water from collecting near the foundation.
› Do not cover a historic foundation with newer
siding material.
› Do not install windows, window wells or an
access door on the front façade of a historic
foundation.
Historic Roof Features
Historic roof features to maintain include:
› Parapet profile
› Historic height and profile.
› Historic materials
› Historic skylights
› Parapet crests
Maintenance Tips:
› Look for breaks or holes in the roof surface
and check the flashing for open seams.
› Watch for vegetation, such as moss and
grass, which indicates accumulated dirt and
retained moisture.
› Patch and replace areas with damaged roof
material (often, repairing a roof can be much
less expensive than complete replacement).
60Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
3.25 Replace a foundation wall using new
material that is similar in character
to the historic foundation.
› For example, if a stone foundation must be
replaced, a material that conveys the scale and
texture of the historic fabric may be considered.
› Use materials and details that are similar to
those used in foundations on nearby historic
properties.
› Avoid increasing the height of the structure
when replacing a foundation wall as it will alter
the alignment of historic façades along the block
and its relationship to other details on the build-
ing.
LOADING DOCKS
Historic loading docks are important character-defining
features of some commercial and industrial buildings
and should be preserved. These features also influence
the perceived scale of the structure. Altering, enclos-
ing, or removing a historic loading dock is discouraged.
Even loading docks on the rear of a building may be
important to the character of a property, because al-
leys in the Old Town Historic District are now active
with pedestrians, among other reasons.
3.26 Maintain and repair a historic
loading dock.
› Maintain the historic location and form of a
loading dock.
› Maintain and repair loading dock components
and details, such as a canopy or railing.
COLOR
Choosing the right combination of colors for a historic
rehabilitation project can unify building elements with
the façade and highlight important architectural detail-
ing. Paint color selection shall be appropriate to the
architectural style and complement the building and
its surroundings. Using the historic color scheme is an
option, but new schemes that are compatible are also
permitted.
3.27 Retain historic colors.
› Retain the historic or early color and texture of
masonry surfaces.
› Retain historic coatings such as paint that help
protect exterior materials from moisture and
ultraviolet light.
› Do not strip paint or other coatings to reveal
bare wood.
› Do not paint unpainted masonry and architec-
tural metals.
› Do not use destructive paint removal methods
such as propane or butane torches, sandblasting
or water blasting which can irreversibly damage
historic materials.
Preserve traditional loading docks.
4
For More Information
See web link to Preservation Brief 10: Exterior Paint
Problems on Historic Woodwork
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 61
3.28 Use a color scheme that is compatible
with the historic character of the
structure.
› Restore historic paint colors and finishes to the
extent reasonable to highlight the structure’s
historic appearance.
› Repaint with colors that are appropriate to the
period of historic significance of the building
and district. Color selection shall be based on
historic paint analysis of the historic layers of
paint or appropriate historic research.
› Use color schemes that are simple in character
(generally one to three accent colors for trim
elements).
› Seek professional advice and properly prepare
surfaces before painting.
Permitted Color Combinations for a
Commercial Storefront
Three colors are generally sufficient to highlight a
commercial storefront.
Base Color. This appears on the upper wall and
frames the storefront. The major expanses on a
storefront will be painted this color.
Major Trim. This defines the decorative elements
of the building and ties the upper façade trim with
the storefront. Elements include:
› Building and storefront cornice
› Window frames, sills and hoods
› Storefront frames, columns, bulk-heads and
canopies.
Minor Trim. This is intended to enhance the
color scheme established by the base and major
trim colors and may be used for window sashes,
doors and selective details.
62Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
EXISTING ADDITIONS
Some existing additions may have become historically
significant in their own right. Preserving an addition
that has taken on significance is an option to consider.
However, more recent additions may detract from the
character of the building and could be considered for
modification or removal.
3.29 Preserve an older addition that has
achieved historic signif icance in its
own right.
› Respect character-defining building components
of a historically-significant addition.
› Avoid the demolition of a historically-significant
additions.
3.30 Consider removing an addition that
is not historically significant.
› Ensure that the historic fabric of the primary
structure is not damaged when removing these
features.
NEW ADDITIONS AND ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES
A new addition or accessory structure that is compat-
ible with the historic building and surrounding historic
context may be permitted. It is important to consider
its design and placement, as well as its relationship to
the surrounding historic context. The design standards
for new construction also apply to the design of a new
addition or accessory structure.
3.31 Design an addition or accessory
structure to be compatible with the
historic structure.
› Design an addition or accessory structure to
be visually subordinate to the historic building
(It shall not replicate the design of the historic
building.)
› Use materials that are of a similar color, tex-
ture, and scale to materials in the surrounding
historic context.
› Design an addition or accessory structure to be
compatible with the scale, massing and rhythm
of the surrounding historic context.
› Incorporate windows, doors and other open-
ings at a consistent solid-to-void ratio to those
found on nearby historic buildings.
› Use simplified versions of building components
and details found in the surrounding historic
context. This may include: a cornice; a distinc-
tive storefront or main door surround; window
sills or other features.
› Do not use replicas of historic building components
and details that would convey a false history or that
would draw undue attention to the addition.
4
For More Information:
See web link to Preservation Brief 14: New Exterior
Additions to Historic Buildings: Preservation Concerns
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/
briefs/14-exterior-additions.htm
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 63
3. 32 Design an addition or secondary
structure to be subordinate to the
historic building.
› Place an addition or secondary structure to the
side or the rear of the historic structure.
› Place a rooftop or upper-story addition to the
rear to minimize visual impacts from public
streets.
› Do not locate an addition on a primary façade.
3. 33 Clearly differentiate an addition
from the historic structure.
› Use changes in material, color and/or wall plane.
› Consider using a lower-scale connecting ele-
ment to join an addition to a historic structure.
› Consider using contemporary architectural
styles or materials in an addition (a simplified
version of the architectural style of the historic
structure may be permitted).
3. 34 Do not try to make an addition or
secondary structure appear older
than it is.
› Avoid using historic details.
3.35 Do not damage the historic fabric
of the historic building when adding
an addition.
› Do not damage or obscure significant architec-
tural features of the historic building.
Locating an Addition to a Historic
Commercial Structure
An addition to a historic commercial structure shall
be subordinate to, and clearly differentiated from,
the historic structure as illustrated below.
Historic
Structure
The one and two-
story commercial
building illustrated
at right are historic.
Historic
Structures
Rear Addition
The rear addition
illustrated at right is
appropriate.
Rear
Addition
4
Rooftop Addition
The rooftop
addition illustrated
at right is appropri-
ate because it is set
back from the front
façade.
Rooftop
Addition
4
Appropriate addition to the rear of a contribut-
64Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
Planning for Energy Efficiency
PLANNING FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY
These standards address maintaining and improving
resource and energy efficiency in a historic building, as
well as methods for approaching energy conservation
and generation technologies. The standards in this
section apply to projects involving historic buildings.
Other sustainability standards throughout this docu-
ment will also apply.
Objectives for historic preservation and community
sustainability are often in alignment. Follow these basic
steps when considering a rehabilitation project for
energy efficiency:
Step 1: Establish Project Goals.
Develop an overall strategy and project goals for
energy efficiency to maximize the effectiveness of
a project. This will establish a broad view that can
help place individual actions into context. Focus on
minimizing use of resources and energy, minimizing
negative environmental impacts, and retaining the his-
toric integrity of a property. Strategies shall maximize
the inherent value of the historic resource prior to
considering alterations or retrofitting with new energy
generation technology.
Step 2: Maintain Building Components in
Sound Condition.
Maintaining existing building fabric reduces negative
environmental impacts. Re-using a building preserves
the energy and resources invested in its construction,
and removes the need for producing new construction
materials.
Step 3: Maximize Inherent Sustainable
Qualities.
Typically, historic buildings in the Old Town Historic
District were built with resources and energy efficiency
in mind. Construction methods focused on durability
and maintenance, resulting in individual building fea-
tures that can be repaired if damaged, thus minimizing
the use of materials throughout the building’s life cycle.
Buildings were also built to respond to local climate
conditions, integrating passive and active strategies for
year-round interior climate control, which increase
energy efficiency. Passive strategies typically include
building orientation and features such as roof over-
hangs and windows to provide both natural day lighting
as well as management of solar heat gain. Active strate-
gies typically include operable building features such as
awnings and double-hung and transom windows.
Identify a building’s inherent sustainable features and
operating systems and maintain them in good operat-
ing condition. In some cases these features may be
covered, damaged or missing; repair or restore them
where necessary.
Step 4: Enhance Building Performance.
A historic building’s inherent energy efficiency shall
be augmented using techniques which improve energy
efficiency without negatively impacting historic building
elements. Noninvasive strategies such as increased in-
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 65
ENHANCING ENERGY PERFORMANCE
Improvements to enhance energy efficiency shall
complement the historic building. The structure, form
and materials shall be sensitively improved in energy
efficiency terms to preserve the building’s character.
3.36 Use noninvasive strategies
when applying weatherization
improvements.
› Use cost-effective weather-stripping, insulation
and storm windows to improve energy ef-
ficiency while preserving historic character.
› Install additional insulation in an attic, basement
or crawl space as a simple method to make a
significant difference in a building’s energy ef-
ficiency. Provide sufficient ventilation to avoid
moisture build-up in the wall cavity.
› Install weatherization strategies in a way that
avoids altering or damaging significant materials
and their finishes.
› Use materials which are environmentally
friendly and that will not interact negatively with
historic building materials.
› When a roof must be replaced, consider install-
ing a radiant barrier.
› Maintain historic windows; keep them in good
repair and seal all leaks.
› Retain historic glass, taking special care in putty
replacement.
› Maintain the glazing compound regularly. Re-
move old putty with care.
› Use operable systems such as storm windows,
insulated coverings, curtains and awnings to
enhance performance of historic windows.
MAINTAINING ENERGY EFFICIENCY
The historic sustainable building features and systems
of a historic building shall be maintained in good oper-
ating condition.
3.37 Preserve the inherent energy
efficient features of the historic
building in operable condition.
› Identify a building’s inherent sustainable features
and operating systems and maintain them in
good condition.
› Retain historic shutters, awnings, canopies and
transoms. Operable features such as these
will increase the range of conditions in which
a building is comfortable without mechanical
climate controls.
Energy Audit
To inform an energy efficiency project strategy,
conduct an energy audit. Energy audits can give
a comprehensive view of how energy is currently
managed, in the daily and seasonal cycles of use,
and can also provide perspective on the payback
of investment for potential work on the building.
For example, an energy audit, when examined
based on an overall strategy, may demonstrate
that priorities shall be on increasing insulation in
66Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
Commercial Building Energy Efficiency Diagram
This diagram summarizes the principal direction in the standards for a rehabilitation project for energy efficiency on a commercial building.
These measures can enhance energy efficiency while retaining the integrity of the historic structure.
Upper-story WindoWs
» Maintain historic windows
» Weather-strip and caulk
» Add storm windows (preferably interior)
transoms
» Retain operable transom to circulate air
solar panels
» Set back from primary façade to minimize visibility
from street
attic
» Insulate internally or roof
Green roof
» Place below parapet line to minimize visibility from
street
Wind tUrbines
» Set back from primary façade to minimize vis-
ibility from street
roof material
» Retain & repair
aWninGs/canopies
» Use operable awnings to control solar access and
heat gain
» Use fixed canopies to provide year-round shade and
shelter
doors
» Maintain/weather-strip historic doors
» Weather-strip
» Consider interior air lock area
storefront WindoWs
» Maintain/weather-strip historic windows
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 67
3. 39 Install solar collectors to minimize
potential adverse effects on the
character of a historic property.
› Place collectors to avoid obscuring significant
features or adversely affecting the perception
of the overall character of the property.
› Size collector arrays to remain subordinate to
the historic structure.
› Install collectors on an addition or secondary
structure.
› Minimize visual impacts by locating collectors
back from the front façade.
› Ensure that exposed hardware, frames and pip-
ing have a matte finish, and are consistent with
the color scheme of the primary structure.
› Use the least invasive method to attach solar
collectors to a historic roof.
USING ENERGY GENERATING
TECHNOLOGIES
Integrate modern energy technology into a historic
structure while maintaining its historic integrity, to the
extent reasonably feasible. Use of energy-generating
technologies should be the final option considered in
an efficiency rehabili-tation project. Utilize strategies to
reduce energy con-sumption prior to undertaking an
energy generation project. Consider the overall
project goals and energy strategies when determining
if a specific technology is right for the project.
As new technologies are tried and tested, it is impor-
tant that they leave no permanent negative impacts to
historic structures. The reversibility of their applica-
tion will be a key consideration when determining if it
shall be permitted.
3.38 Locate energy-generating
technology to minimize impacts to
the historic character of the site
and structure.
› Locate technology where it will not damage,
obscure or cause removal of significant features
or materials.
› Maintain the historic character of the building.
› Install technology in such a way that it can be
readily removed and the historic character eas-
ily restored.
› Use materials which are environmentally
friendly and that will not interact negatively
with historic building materials.
3.40 Install wind turbines to minimize
potential adverse effects on the
character of a historic property.
› Use turbines and any exposed hardware with
a matte finish that is consistent with the
color scheme of the primary structure.
› Do not obscure significant features or impair
the building’s historic significance.
› Attach turbines in a manner that avoids damage
to significant features.
› Install turbines to allow restoration of affected
68Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
ACCESSIBILITY
In 1990, the passage of the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) mandated that all places of public accom-
modation be accessible to everyone. This includes his-
toric structures that are used for commercial, rental,
multi-family and public uses. Note that the law provides
that alternative measures may be considered when the
integrity of a historic resource may be threatened.
In most cases, property owners can comply without
compromising the historic resource. Owners of his-
toric properties should comply to the fullest extent
feasible with accessibility laws, while also preserving
the integrity of the character-defining features of their
building or site. These standards shall not prevent or
inhibit compliance with accessibility laws.
3.41 Accessibility improvements shall be
designed to preserve the integrity
of a historic property.
› Retain the key features of the historic structure
in any design.
› Ensure that accessibility improvements are
“reversible.”
PHASING PRESERVATION IMPROVEMENTS
In some cases, a property owner may wish to make in-
terim preservation improvements, rather than execute
a complete rehabilitation of a historic property. This
work shall be planned such that it establishes a founda-
tion for future improvements that will further assure
continued use of the property and retain its historic
significance. For example, a simplified cornice element
may be installed on a commercial storefront, in lieu of
reconstructing the historic design, with the intent that
an accurate reconstruction would occur later.
3.42 Plan interim preservation
improvements to retain opportunities
for future rehabilitation work that
will enhance the integrity of a
historic property.
› Preserve key character-defining features while
making interim preservation improvements.
› Avoid interim preservation improvements that
would foreclose opportunities for more exten-
sive rehabilitation in the future.
› See photo sequence on page 28.
Accessibility improvements shall be designed to preserve the
integrity of a historic property to the maximum extent feasible.
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014 69
TEMPORARY STABILIZATION
TREATMENTS
When a building is to be unoccupied for an extended
period of time, it may be secured in a way in which
to preserve historically significant features and prevent
deterioration from weathering or vandalism. Often
termed “mothballing,” such procedures are particularly
relevant to properties that have been vacant for a long
time. Stabilization shall be planned such that the integ-
rity of the property will be maintained.
3.43 If a building is unoccupied, secure
it in a way that protects its historic
character.
› Maintain a weather-tight roof. Temporary roof-
ing may be installed if needed.
› Structurally stabilize the building, if needed.
› When enclosing a window or door opening,
avoid damaging frame and sash components.
Mount any panel to cover the opening on the
interior. Also, paint the panels to match the
building color.
› Provide adequate ventilation to the interior of
the building.
EXISTING HISTORIC ALTERATIONS
Many historic structures experience changes over time
as design tastes change or need for additional space
occurs. Many of these occurred while retaining the
characteristics that are key historic features.
Some of these alterations now may be historically
significant themselves. An addition constructed in a
manner compatible with the historic building and as-
sociated with the period of significance is an example,
and it too may merit preservation in its own right.
In contrast, more recent alterations usually have no
historic significance and may even detract from the
character of the building and obscure significant fea-
tures. Removing such an alteration may be considered
in a rehabilitation project. Historic features that have
been modified can also be restored.
3.44 Consider the significance of early
alterations and additions. Consider
these options:
› Preserve an older addition or alteration that has
achieved historic significance in its own right,
when it is key to understanding the history of
the property.
› Take the context into consideration. If other
nearby properties also reflect a similar history
of alteration, then preserving the alteration may
be preferred. In other cases, if other buildings
are more intact, in terms of their historic char-
acter, then removing the alteration to restore
the earlier appearance may be preferred.
70Resources Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
DRAFT
4
DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ALL PROPERTIES
73
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
AWNINGS AND CANOPIES
Traditionally, awnings and canopies were noteworthy
features of buildings in the Old Town Historic District,
and their continued use is encouraged. These elements
are simple in detail, and they reflect the character of
the buildings to which they are attached.
4.1 Preserve traditional canopies.
› Retain historic hardware.
4.2 Install an awning or canopy to f it
the opening and be in character with
the building.
› A fabric awning is permitted.
› A fixed metal canopy may be considered when
it would be in character.
› Mount an awning or canopy to accentuate
character-defining features. The awning or
canopy shall fit in the openings of the buildings.
› Simple sloping awnings and flat canopies are
permitted. Odd shapes, bullnose awnings and
bubble awnings are prohibited.
4.3 Design an awning or canopy with
colors and materials that are
durable and compatible with the
structure.
› Use canvas or a similar woven material
(preferred approach) for an awning.
› Do not use a material without proven durabil-
ity or that has a gloss finish.
› Contemporary awnings are permitted.
Design Standards for All Properties
› Post supported canopies are prohibited on
the front facade of a commercial building.
However, they are permitted on a rear
facade that faces an alley.
Design an awning or canopy with colors and materials that are
durable and compatible with the structure.
Traditionally, awnings were noteworthy features of commercial
buildings, and their continued use is encouraged.
Awnings and canopies can help define windows,
entry areas and the pedestrian level of buildings.
For More Information
See web link to Preservation Brief 44: The Use of
Awnings on Historic Buildings, Repair, Replacement
and New Design
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/
briefs/44-awnings.htm
74
DRAFT
Design Standards for All Projects
STREET LAYOUT
Established vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle access
shall be preserved.
4.4 Retain the historic network of
streets and alleys.
› The network of streets and alleys shall be
retained as public circulation space and for
maximum public access.
› Streets and alleys shall not be enclosed or
closed to public access.
› Link a new walkway to an existing public
right-of-way.
OUTDOOR USE AREAS
Outdoor use areas occur as accents. These include
outdoor dining areas and small public plazas. These
shall be integrated with the design of the site and the
building.
Small Public Plazas and Courtyards
A small public plaza or courtyard may be considered.
However, within the heart of the Old Town Historic
District, where the greatest concentration of historic
storefronts align, creating a gap in the street wall is
discouraged, because it disrupts the street wall.
4.5 A small public plaza or courtyard
shall contain features to promote
and enhance its use.
› It must be: directly accessible to the public
way; level with the public way;
› It may have one or all of the following: street
furniture; public art; historical/interpretive
marker.
A small public plaza or courtyard is permitted at the
rear of the structure to help to enliven the alley set-
ting.
75
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
Terraces, Patios and Deck Space
Improvements that provide areas for active outdoor
use (i.e., dining) are welcomed amenities, but they must
be in character with the historic fabric in the Old Town
Historic District. There are typically two types: raised
and at-grade.
4.6 Locate a raised dining area (deck)
to minimize visual impacts to the
street.
› Placing it to the rear of a property is preferred.
› A rooftop deck may be permitted, if it is set
back from the building facade.
› A projecting or cantilevered deck is prohibited.
› Dining support service areas, such as wait
stations and dish areas, shall be located away
from public view.
4.7 Locate an at-grade dining area to
minimize impacts on the streetscape.
› Consider locating an at-grade dining area to
the side or rear of a property to the extent
reasonably feasible.
› It is permissible to locate an at-grade
dining area in the public ROW in a street wall
context, subject to any necessary permits
or encroachment agreements which may
be required. The dining area shall be clearly
defined in this setting.
HANDRAILS AND ENCLOSURES
In some circumstances it may be necessary to add
handrails or an enclosure to a property to accommo-
date an outdoor dining area, accessibility or to enhance
safety. If so, it must have minimal impact on the urban
setting and/or a historic resource.
4.8 A railing shall be simple in design.
› Simple metal work is permitted.
› Very ornate metal, plastic or wood designs are
prohibited.
› The railing shall be transparent in its overall
appearance. One shall be able to see through
to the building.
Railings shall be mostly transparent and simple in design.
4
4
76
DRAFT
Design Standards for All Projects
SITE LIGHTING
The light level at the property line is a key design con-
sideration. This is affected by the number of fixtures,
their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per
fixture. It is also affected by the screening and design
of the fixture. Light spill onto adjacent properties and
into the night sky shall be minimized and the design
shall be compatible with the district.
4.11 Shield lighting to prevent off-site
glare.
› A light fixture shall incorporate a cut-off
shield to direct light downward.
› A luminaire (lamp) shall not be visible from
adjacent streets or properties.
› Shield a fixture to minimize light spill onto
adjacent properties and into the night sky.
4 .12 A light f ixture must be in character
with the setting.
› A fixture shall be compatible with the historic
context.
ART AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES
Public art is welcomed as an amenity in Fort Collins’
historic districts. It shall be planned as an integral
component of the urban environment and shall be
strategically located to serve as an accent to public
areas. An installation on private property that is
visible from the public way also shall be planned to
retain the historic significance of a property.
4 .9 Plub l i c a r t must be compa t i b l e
with the historic context.
› An art installation shall not impede one’s
ability to interpret the historic character of
the district.
› Locate public art such that the ability to
perceive the character of historic buildings
nearby is maintained.
4.10 An art installation on a historic
property must be compatible with
the resource. It shall:
› Maintain one’s ability to interpret the historic
character of the resource.
› Preserve key features that contribute to the
property’s significance.
› Be reversible in a way that the key features of
the property remain intact.
77
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
BUILDING LIGHTING
The character and level of lighting that is used on a
building is of special concern. Traditionally, exterior
lights were simple in character and were used to high-
light signs and building entrances. Most fixtures had
incandescent lamps that cast a color similar to daylight,
were relatively low intensity and were shielded with
simple shade devices. Although new lamp types may
be considered, the overall effect of modest, focused,
building light shall be continued.
When installing lighting on a historic building, use exist-
ing documentation as a basis for the new design. If no
documentation exists, use a contemporary light fixture
that is simple in design. Building lighting shall be installed
in a manner so as not to damage the historic fabric of
the building and shall be reversible. Most historic light-
ing was subdued and directed at signs, entrances and in
a few cases building features.
4.13 Use lighting to accent:
› Building entrances, signs and to illuminate
walkways.
4.14 Minimize the visual impacts of
architectural lighting.
› Use exterior light sources with a low level of
luminescence.
› Use lights that cast a similar color to daylight.
› Do not wash an entire building facade in light.
› Use lighting fixtures that are appropriate to the
building and its surroundings in terms of style,
finish, scale and intensity of illumination.
› Mount exterior fixtures in an inconspicuous
manner.
› Do not damage or obscure historic building
components and fabric when mounting
exterior fixtures.
4.15 Use shielded and focused light
sources to prevent glare.
› Provide shielded and focused light sources that
direct light downward.
› Do not use high intensity light sources or cast
light directly upward.
› Avoid excessive light spill from buildings.
78
DRAFT
Design Standards for All Projects
SURFACE PARKING
The visual impact of surface parking shall be mini-
mized. On-site parking must be subordinate to other
uses and the front of the lot shall not appear to be a
parking area.
4.18 Minimize the visual impact of
surface parking.
› Locate a parking area at the rear or to the
side of a site or to the interior of the block
to the maximum extent feasible. This is
especially important on corner properties.
Corner properties are generally more visible
than interior lots, serve as landmarks and
provide a sense of enclosure to an intersec-
tion.
4.19 Site a surface lot so it will minimize
gaps in the continuous building wall
of a commercial block.
› Where a parking lot shares a site with a
building, place the parking at the rear of
the site, or if this is not feasible, beside the
building.
4.20 Provide a visual buffer where a
parking lot abuts a public sidewalk.
› A landscaped strip or planter using a combi-
nation of trees and shrubs is permitted.
› A low, decorative wall as a screen for the
edge of the lot is also permitted. Materials
must be compatible with those of nearby
buildings.
SERVICE AREAS
Service areas shall be visually unobtrusive and must be
integrated with the design of the site and the building.
4.16 Minimize the visual impacts of a
service area.
› Orient a service entrance, waste/compost
disposal area or other service area toward
service lanes and away from public streets.
› Screen a service area with a wall, fence or
planting, in a manner that is in character with
the building and its site.
4.17 Position a service area to
minimize conflicts with other
abutting uses.
› Minimize noise impacts by locating sources of
offensive sounds away from other uses.
› Use an alley.
Orient a service area towards service lanes and away from public
streets.
4
79
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
BUFFERS
Parking, storage and equipment areas shall be visually
buffered with landscaping or a screen wall. The design
must complement the context.
4.21 Provide a visual buffer along the
edge of a parking lot or service area.
› Use a landscape strip or screen wall at the
edge of a parking lot.
› Provide an evergreen landscape buffer or
screen wall by ground mounted mechanical
equipment, service and/or storage areas.
BUILDING EQUIPMENT
Junction boxes, external fire connections, telecom-
munication devices, cables, conduits, satellite dishes,
HVAC equipment and fans may affect the character of
a property. These and similar devices shall be screened
from public view to avoid negative effects.
4.22 Minimize the visual impacts of
building equipment on the public
way and the district as a whole.
› Screen equipment from view.
› Do not locate equipment on a primary facade.
› Use low-profile or recessed mechanical units
on rooftops.
› Locate satellite dishes and mechanical equip-
ment out of public view.
› Locate utility lines and junction boxes on
secondary and tertiary walls, and group them,
to the maximum extent feasible.
› Group utility lines in conduit, and paint these
elements, to match the existing background
color, to the maximum extent feasible.
› Locate a utility pedestal (ground mounted) to
the rear of a building, to the maximum extent
feasible.
Parking Buffers
Consider the use of a landscaped
strip or planter to provide a visual
buffer where a parking lot abuts a public
sidewalk.
4
80
DRAFT
Design Standards for All Projects
4.23 Install mechanical equipment
to minimize impacts on historic
fabric.
› Install mechanical equipment in areas and
spaces that require the least amount of
alteration to the historic building.
› Avoid cutting holes in important architectural
features, such as cornices, decorative ceilings
and paneling.
› Do not install mechanical equipment on
a primary façade, to the maximum extent
feasible.
SECURITY DEVICES
It may sometimes be necessary to provide a security
device on a building. It shall be designed to be as
inconspicuous as possible, and must not alter signifi-
cant architectural features of the building. The use of
interior, operable, transparent devices is preferred.
4.24 Minimize the visual impact of
security devices.
› Locate a security device inside a storefront,
to the maximum extent feasible.
› Use operable and transparent (simple bars
with spacing so one can view through to
display) security devices on ground floor
storefronts, to the maximum extent feasible.
› Opaque, roll-down metal screens are
prohibited, because these obscure products
on display and thereby weaken the interest
of the street to pedestrians when in a closed
position.
› Decorative security devices are permitted
when they complement the architectural
style.
› Security devices are prohibited above the
second floor, unless unique security condi-
tions are indicated.
Install roof-mounted mechanical equipment, such as air
conditioners, to be inconspicuous when viewed from pub-
lic streets.
Back side of
building.
4
81
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
4.25 Do not damage the character of
the historic building when installing
a security device.
› Do not damage or obscure significant architec-
tural features of the historic building.
› The installation shall be reversible. Once
removed the historic building must remain
intact and the integrity of historic materials
shall not be compromised.
4 4
4
Decorative secu-
rity devices are
permitted when they
complement the
architectural style.
82
DRAFT
Design Standards for All Projects
4.27 Base or background colors shall
be muted.
› Building features shall be muted, while trim
accents can be either a contrasting color or a
harmonizing color.
› An accent color shall not contrast so strongly
as to not read as part of the composition.
› Bright high-intensity colors are not permit-
ted.
› Use matte or low luster finishes instead of
glossy ones.
› Non-reflective, muted finishes on all features
is preferred.
4.28 Building elements shall be
f inished in a manner similar to that
seen traditionally. The following
are recommended treatments:
› Brick and stone: unpainted, natural color
unless painted historically
› Window frames and sash, doors and frame
and storefronts: wood - painted; metal -
anodized or baked color
› Highly reflective materials, weathered wood
and clear finishes are prohibited on large
surfaces. A clear finish is permitted on a
wood entry door.
ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Negative impacts on archeological resources shall be
avoided.
4.29 Leave archeological resources in
place, to the maximum extent
feasible.
› Avoid disturbing known archeological
resources, to the maximum extent feasible.
› If archeological materials are discovered
contact the City of Fort Collins Historic
Preservation office.
COLOR
Traditionally, color schemes in the Old Town Historic
District were relatively muted. A single base color
was applied to the primary wall plane. Then, one or
two accent colors were used to highlight ornamental
features, as well as trim around doors and windows.
Since many of the commercial structures were brick,
the natural color of the masonry became the back-
ground color. Sometimes a contrasting masonry was
used for window sills and moldings. As a result, the
contrast between the base color and trim was rela-
tively subtle. These traditions of using limited num-
bers of colors, and muted ones, shall be continued.
These standards do not specify which colors should
be selected, but rather how they shall be used.
4.26 The facade shall “read” as a single
composition.
› Employ color schemes that are simple in
character.
› Using one base color for the building walls
5
DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION
85
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
Overview
Designing a new building to fit within the historic char-
acter of the Old Town Historic District requires careful
thought. Preservation in a historic district context does
not mean that the area must be “frozen” in time, but it
does mean that, when new building occurs, it shall be in
a manner that reinforces the basic visual characteristics
of the district. This does not imply, however, that a new
building must look old. In fact, imitating historic styles
is discouraged.
Rather than imitating older styles, a new design shall
relate to the fundamental characteristics of the his-
toric context while also conveying the design trends
of today. It may do so by drawing upon basic ways of
building that make up a part of the character of the
district. Such features include the way in which a build-
ing is located on its site, the manner in which it relates
to the street and its basic mass, form and materials.
When these design variables are arranged in a new
building to be similar to those seen traditionally, visual
compatibility results.
This section provides design standards for new infill
construction and improvements to buildings that con-
tribute to the fabric in the Old Town Historic District.
› Building Placement and Orientation
› Architectural Character and Detail
› Building Mass, Scale and Height
› Building and Roof Forms
› Primary Entrances
› Materials
› Windows
New Additions
A new addition to an existing building in the
historic district shall follow the standards for new
construction provided in this section. See also the
Design Standards for the Treatment of Historic
Resources section, for additional standards that
apply to additions to a historic structure.
The general alignment of storefronts, moldings and upper story windows contributes to the visual continuity of many commercial
blocks in Old Town Fort Collins. A variation in the height of cornices exists, within a range of one to three stories. Facade widths also
vary, but within a relatively narrow range.
86
DRAFT
Design Standards for New Construction
Considering Context
Compatibility with the Old Town context is a key
principle for the design of new construction. This
typically focuses on buildings in the same block, on
both sides of the street, and also across an alley.
In some cases, a structure that is not historic may
also be found in the immediate vicinity, but this
does not influence considerations of compatibility.
BUILDING PLACEMENT AND ORIENTATION
Traditionally, buildings in Old Town were arranged
in consistent development patterns, in terms of their
site plan and orientation. Most commercial buildings
aligned uniformly along a street. This created a con-
sistent “street wall” that is now a key feature of the
historic district.
Reinforcing traditional development patterns is
paramount in designing a new building to fit within
the historic district. New infill shall reflect traditional
development patterns, including facade alignment and
uniform building orientation.
5.1 Maintain the alignment of building
fronts along the street.
› Locate a new building to reflect established
alignment patterns along the block.
› Where historic buildings are positioned at
the sidewalk edge, creating a uniform street
wall, then a new building shall conform to this
alignment.
5.2 Maintain the traditional pattern of
buildings facing the street.
› Locate a primary entrance to face the street
and design it to be clearly identifiable.
› For a commercial storefront, use a recessed
Locate a primary entrance to face the street and be clearly iden- entry.
tifiable.
4
New Commercial Building Design
Maintain the alignment of building fronts along the street.
87
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
4
ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER AND DETAIL
In order to assure that historic resources are appreci-
ated as authentic contributors in the historic district,
it is important that a new building be distinguishable
from them while also remaining compatible with the
context. New construction shall appear as a product
of its own time while also being compatible with the
historically significant resources of the area.
5.3 Design a new building to express its
own time while remaining compatible
with the historic district.
› See the standards that follow for information
about basic elements of compatibility.
5.4 An interpretation of a historic style
that is authentic to the district
will be considered if it is subtly
distinguishable as being new.
› Avoid an exact imitation of a historic style that
would blur the distinction between old and
new buildings and make it more difficult to
understand the architectural evolution of the
district.
4
New construction should appear as a product of its own time
while also being compatible with the historically significant
resources of the area.
Avoid an exact imitation of a historic style that would blur the
distinction between old and new buildings and make it more dif-
ficult to understand the architectural evolution of the district.
88
DRAFT
Design Standards for New Construction
4
Design a new building to reflect its time while respecting key
features of its context.
5.5 Incorporate traditional facade
articulation techniques in a new
design. Use these methods:
› a tall first floor
› vertically proportioned upper story windows
› window sills and frames that provide detail
› horizontal expression elements, such as
canopies, belt courses, moldings and cornices
› vertical expression features, such as columns
and pilasters
› a similar ratio of solid wall to window area
› a base, middle and a cap
4
Incorporate traditional facade articulation techniques in a
new design.
Incorporate a kickplate into a
storefront design.
89
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
4
BUILDING MASS, SCALE AND HEIGHT
Each historic building in the district exhibits distinct
characteristics of mass, height and a degree of wall
articulation that contributes to its sense of scale. As
groupings, these structures establish a definitive sense
of scale. A new building shall express these traditions
of mass and scale, and it must be compatible in height,
mass and scale with its context, including the specific
block and the historic district as a whole.
5.6 Convey the traditional size of historic
buildings in new construction as it is
perceived at the street level.
› The height of a new building shall appear to
be within the height range established in the
context, especially at the street frontage.
› Floor-to-floor heights shall appear similar to
those of traditional buildings.
› If an additional floor is permitted, place it (or
sufficient portions of it) back from the street
front to maintain the traditional range of
heights at the street edge.
5.7 The overall height of a new building
shall be compatible with the historic
district. A building height that
exceeds the height range established
in the context will be considered
when:
› It is demonstrated that the additional height
will be compatible with adjacent properties and
for the historic district at large.
› Taller portions are set back from the street.
› Access to light and air of surrounding proper-
ties is respected.
The overall height of a new building should be compatible with
the historic district. A building height that exceeds the height
range established in the context will be considered when it is
demonstrated that the additional height will be compatible with
adjacent properties and for the historic district at large. Note the
additional height on the building in the background steps back
from the front and side.
4
The height of a new building should appear to be within the
height range established in the context, especially at the street
frontage.
90
DRAFT
Design Standards for New Construction
Mass, Scale and Height at Different Levels
Building mass, scale and height shall be considered
in these ways:
(1) As experienced at the street level immediately
adjacent to the building.
› At this level of perception, the actual
height of the building wall at the street
edge is a key factor. The scale of windows
and doors, the modular characteristics of
building materials, and the expression of
floor heights also contribute to perceived
scale.
(2) As viewed along a block, in perspective with
others in the immediate area.
› The degree of similarity (or diversity) of
building heights along a block, and the
repetition of similar features, including
openings, materials and horizontal expres-
sion lines, combine to establish an overall
sense of scale at this level of experiencing
context.
(3) As seen from key public viewpoints inside and
outside of the historic district.
› In groups, historic buildings and compat-
ible newer structures establish a sense of
scale for the entire district and define the
skyline.
5.8 Provide variation in building height
when a new building is substantially
larger than historic buildings in the
district.
› In order to reduce the perceived mass of
a larger building, divide it into subordinate
modules that reflect traditional building sizes
in the context.
› Vary the height of building modules in a large
structure, and include portions that are similar
in height to historic structures in the district.
Avoid excessive modulation of a building mass,
since this would be out of character with
simpler historic building forms in the area.
5.9 Maintain the scale of traditional
building widths in the context.
› Design a new building to reflect the estab-
lished range of the traditional building widths
in the district.
› Where a building must exceed this width, use
changes in design features so the building reads
as separate building modules reflecting tradi-
tional building widths and massing. Changes
in the expression and details of materials,
changes in window design, facade heights or
materials are examples of techniques that shall
be considered.
› Where these articulation techniques are used,
they shall be expressed consistently through-
out the structure, such that the composition
91
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
4
This single, new infill building is divided into modules to reflect the scale of the historic
context. The height of a new building shall appear to be within the height range of historic
buildings, especially at street frontage.
5.10 Establish a sense of human scale in
a building design.
› Use vertical and horizontal articulation
techniques to reduce the apparent mass of a
larger building and to create visual interest.
› Express the position of each floor in the
external skin of a building to establish a scale
similar to historic buildings in the district.
› Use materials that convey scale in their
proportion, detail and form.
› Design architectural details to be in scale
with the building. Using windows, doors, and
storefronts (in commercial buildings) that are
similar in scale to those seen traditionally is
permitted.
This single infill building successfully employs building articulation
methods to break up the mass of the building. Note the height
of the storefront, depth of openings and variation in parapet
heights. The building also reads as separate masses with the
vertical circulation offsets that have been employed.
4
4
92
DRAFT
Design Standards for New Construction
BUILDING AND ROOF FORMS
A similarity of building forms also contributes to a
sense of visual continuity. In order to maintain this
feature, a new building shall have a basic form that is
similar to that seen traditionally.
5.11 Use simple, rectangular building
forms.
› Use building forms that appear similar to
traditional forms.
› Use roof forms similar to those seen tradition-
ally in the district.
Floor to floor heights shall appear similar to those of traditional
buildings.
4
Use a tall first floor and vertically proportioned upper story win-
dows.
4
93
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
ENTRANCES
Traditionally in the historic district, most primary en-
trances were oriented to the street and were recessed.
They provided visual interest and a sense of scale to
each building. A primary entrance shall be clearly iden-
tifiable in a new building and it must be in character
with the building and its context. The entrance shall
include features to signify it as such, and convey a sense
of scale.
5.12 Orient a primary entrance towards
the street.
› Design an entrance to a commercial building
to convey a sense of scale and provide visual
interest.
5.13 Maintain the pattern created by
recessed entryways.
› Set the door back an adequate amount from
the front facade to establish a distinct thresh-
old for pedestrians.
› Where an entry is to be recessed, the building
line at the sidewalk edge shall be maintained by
the upper floor(s).
› Use a transom over a doorway to maintain the
full vertical height of the storefront.
› Oversized and undersized entrances are
discouraged.
4
94
DRAFT
Design Standards for New Construction
MATERIALS
Traditional building materials in the historic district
include various types of masonry, primarily brick, stone
and concrete. Today, these materials are key to the
character of the district.
Building materials shall reflect the range of textures,
modularity and finish of those employed traditionally.
They also shall contribute to the visual continuity of
the specific historic district. They shall be of proven
durability in similar applications.
5.14 Use building materials that appear
similar in scale, color, texture and
f inish to those seen historically in
the district.
› Use materials that are proven to be durable in
the local climate.
› Use materials that will maintain an intended
finish over time, or acquire a patina.
› When possible, use masonry with a modular
dimension similar to typical masonry materials.
› When an alternative material is permitted, use
a durable material. (See “Using New Materi-
als” to the left for more information.)
› On the ground level, use materials that will
withstand on-going contact with the public,
sustaining impacts without compromising their
appearance.
Typical Materials
Typical historic building materials used in Old Town
Fort Collins include:
» Masonry
› Brick
› Stone
› Terra Cotta
› Poured Concrete
› Pre-cast Concrete
» Wood
» Metal
› Cast iron,
› Copper
› Sheet metal
Understanding the character of these materials and
the patterns they create is essential to developing
new interpretations.
Using New Materials
Compatibility with historic materials can be
achieved without purely replicating their traditional
use. A new building material that conveys the es-
sence of modularity and the texture and finish of
historic masonry, and that has proven durability in
the local climate, is often compatible.
The degree to which an alternative material may
be used successfully on a new building also will be
influenced by the degree of consistency or variety
in materials that already exists in the block.
Use building materials that appear similar in scale, color, texture
and finish to those seen historically in the district.
95
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
WINDOWS
The manner in which windows are used to articulate
a new building wall is an important consideration in
establishing a sense of scale and visual continuity. Tradi-
tionally in Old Town, a storefront system was installed
on the ground floor and upper story windows often
appeared as punched openings.
These features often align with others in the block, and
establish a rhythm or pattern of solid and void that vi-
sually links buildings along the street. These traditional
arrangements may also be interpreted in contempo-
rary designs that complement the established patterns
within the historic district.
Window design and placement shall help to establish
a sense of scale and provide pedestrian interest. Es-
tablished solid to void patterns must be maintained.
Contemporary and creative design interpretations of
window rhythms and patterns that reference, but do
not duplicate historic designs, are also permitted.
5.15 A contemporary storefront design
is permitted.
› Design a building to incorporate a ground floor
storefront.
› Incorporate the basic design features found
in traditional storefronts, such as a kickplate,
display window, transom and a primary
entrance.
› In storefront details, use elements similar in
profile and depth of detailing seen historically.
Design a building to incorporate a ground floor storefront.
In traditional commercial buildings, a storefront system was
installed on the ground floor and upper story windows often
appeared as punched openings. These features are recognized
in this contemporary building front. However, a more appropri-
ate treatment could be provided in the larger openings to reflect
traditional window proportions; for example, a vertical and hori-
zontal feature could be provided within the opening.
4 4
4
Incorporate the basic design features found in traditional store-
fronts, such as a kickplate, display window, transom and a pri-
mary entrance.
96
DRAFT
Design Standards for New Construction
5.16 Arrange windows to reflect the
traditional rhythm and general
alignment of others in the district.
› Use window rhythms and alignments similar
to traditional buildings, such as: vertically
proportioned, single or sets of windows,
“punched” into a more solid wall surface, and
evenly spaced along upper floors; window sills
or headers that align; and rows of windows
or storefront systems of similar dimensions,
aligned horizontally along a wall surface
› Creative interpretations of traditional window
arrangement will be considered.
5.17 Use durable window materials.
› Permitted window materials include metal and
wood frame.
› Prohibited window materials include synthetic
materials that do not have a proven durability,
such as plastic snap-in muntins.
Arrange windows to reflect the traditional rhythm and general
alignment of others in the area.
4
97
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
New Construction and Sustainability
ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN NEW DESIGNS
The conservation of energy is a key objective in site
design, building design and building orientation. The
site design process shall include an evaluation of the
physical assets of the site to maximize energy efficiency
and conservation in the placement and design of a build-
ing. Designs shall consider seasonal changes in natural
lighting and ventilation conditions.
A design shall also take into account the potential
effect on an adjoining property, in terms of its solar ac-
cess and ability to implement the same environmental
design principles. Careful consideration shall also be
given to balancing sustainable design principles with
those related to maintaining the traditional character
of the area.
5.18 Locate a new building, or an
addition, to take advantage of
microclimatic opportunities for
energy conservation, while avoiding
negative impacts to the historic
context.
› Orient a building to be consistent with historic
development patterns to the maximum extent
feasible.
› Maximize energy efficiency and conservation
opportunities to the extent reasonably feasible.
5.19 Design a building, or an addition, to
take advantage of energy saving and
generating opportunities.
› Design windows to maximize daylighting into
interior spaces.
› Use exterior shading devices to manage solar
gain in summer months. For example, use
canopies or awnings on storefronts similar to
how they were used traditionally.
› Energy-generating devices, including solar
collectors and wind turbines, are permitted
where they also remain visually subordinate.
98
DRAFT
Design Standards for New Construction
COMMERCIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY
DIAGRAM
A
Wind Devices: Set back
from primary facade to
minimize visibility from
the street.
B
Operable Transoms:
Allows for natural air
circulation.
C
Green Roofs: Set back
from primary facade to
minimize visibility from
the street.
D
Shading Devices:
Operable canopies
located above display
windows.
E
Solar Panels: Set back
from primary facade
to minimize visibility
from the street.
A
B
C
D
E
These sustainability designs should be considered in the context of an overall strategy.
99
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN BUILDING MASSING
A building mass shall maximize the potential for natural
daylighting as well as solar energy collection, while
avoiding negative impacts to the historic context.
5.20 Shape a building’s mass to maximize
solar energy potential. Use the
following strategies:
› Design a building to allow natural daylighting to
the interior.
› Articulate wall planes as a way to provide
shade or increase solar access to interiors.
› Use thermal storage walls on a portion of
the south facing building exposure, where
appropriate.
5.21 Orient a building to maximize
green principles while ensuring
compatibility with adjacent,
lower-scale structures. Permitted
strategies include:
› Position the taller portion of a building along a
north-south axis to minimize shading on lower
scale structures to the north.
› Design a building mass to minimize shading
south-facing facades of adjacent buildings
during winter months.
Articulate building mass to take advantage of solar energy. The
image above shows a plaza to the left. It is shaded during peak
winter hours, therefore the plaza location should be considered on
the opposite side of the building. Below, the plaza is to the right; it is
enhanced by solar rays during peak winter hours.
100
DRAFT
Design Standards for New Construction
ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN
BUILDING ELEMENTS
The elements that make up a new building, including
windows, mechanical systems and materials, can signifi-
cantly impact environmental performance. These shall
be designed to maximize the building’s efficiency, while
promoting compatibility with surrounding sites and
structures. New materials that improve environmental
performance are permitted if they have been proven
effective in this climate and are compatible with the
historic context.
5.22 Use green building materials
whenever possible. Such materials
are:
› locally manufactured
› low maintenance
› materials with long life spans
› recycled materials
5.23 Incorporate building elements that
allow for natural environmental
control. Consider the following:
› operable windows for natural ventilation
› low infiltration fenestration products
› interior or exterior light shelves/solar screens
above south facing windows
› green roofs
SOLAR AND WIND ENERGY DEVICES
Solar and wind energy devices (i.e., solar panels, wind
turbines) shall be positioned to have a minimal effect
on the character of Old Town.
5.24 Minimize the visual impacts of
energy devices on the character of
Old Town.
› Mount equipment where it has the least visual
impact, to the maximum extent feasible.
› Exposed hardware, frames and piping shall have
a matte finish, and be consistent with the color
scheme of the primary structure.
Green Roofs
Green roofs provide the following benefits:
› Increase energy efficiency
› Moderate waste diversion
› Stormwater management
› Reduce heat island effect
› Improve air quality
› Provide amenity space for building users
6
DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SIGNS
103
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
Overview
Signs are important elements of Old Town and balanc-
ing their functional requirements with the objectives
for the overall character of the district is a key con-
sideration. Their placement, relationship to historic
features and general character are key considerations.
This section provides standards that address the
qualitative aspects of sign design, in terms of how signs
contribute to the character of a historic district and to
individual properties. Materials include:
› Treatment of Historic Signs
› Sign Installation on a Historic Building
› Design of New and Modified Signs
› Design of Specific Sign Types
› Sign Illumination
Common signs types found in the district include:
› Projecting signs
› Flush wall signs
› Awning signs
› Interpretive signs
› Window and door signs
Signs are important
elements of Old
Town and balanc-
ing their functional
requirements with
the objectives for
the overall charac-
ter of the district is
a key consideration.
4 4
4
Sign Code
In addition to these standards, also see the Fort
Collins Land Use Code, Division 3.8 Supplementary
Regulations, 3.8.7 Signs.
104
DRAFT
Design Standards for Signs
All historic signs shall be retained. Historic signs that
represent the district’s evolution are also important.
6.1 Consider history , context and
design when determining whether
to retain a historic sign. Retention
is especially important when a sign
is:
› Associated with historic figures, events or
places.
› Significant as evidence of the history of the
product, business or service advertised.
› A significant part of the history of the building
or the historic district.
› Characteristic of a specific historic period.
› Integral to the building’s design or physical
fabric.
› Integrated into the design of a building such
that removal could harm the integrity of a
historic property’s design or cause significant
damage to its materials.
› An outstanding example of the sign maker’s
art because of its craftsmanship, use of
materials, or design.
› Historically significant type of sign
Flush wall signs and individual letter signs are signs
that are mounted on a building wall. They do not
project significantly from the surface to which they
are mounted.
6.2 Leave a historic wall sign exposed.
› Do not paint over a historic sign.
› There are times when some alterations to a
historic wall sign may be permitted; these are:
› If the sign is substantially deteriorated,
patching and repairing is permitted.
› If it is located on a secondary facade
› If the sign serves a continuing use, i.e.,
there are older signs that still have an
active business and they need to change
information such as the hours of operation
6.3 Do not over restore a historic wall
sign.
› Do not restore a historic wall sign to the point
that all evidence of its age is lost.
› Do not significantly re-paint a historic wall sign
even if its appearance and form is recaptured.
4
Leave historic wall signs exposed.
Treatment of Historic Signs
See Also:
Web link to Preservation Brief 25: The Preserva-
tion of Historic Signs
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/
briefs/25-signs.htm
105
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
Sign Installation on a Historic Building
When installing a new sign on a historic building,
it is important to maintain the key architectural
features of and minimize potential damage to the
building.
6.4 Avoid damaging or obscuring
architectural details or other
building features when installing
a sign.
› No sign or sign structure or support shall
be placed onto or obscure or damage any
significant architectural feature of a building,
including but not limited to a window or a
door frame, cornice, molding, ornamental
feature, or unusual or fragile material.
6.5 A sign shall not obscure character-
defining features of a historic
building.
› A sign shall be designed to integrate with
the architectural features of a building, not
distract from them.
› No sign shall be painted onto any significant
architectural feature, including but not limited
to a window or door frame, cornice, molding,
ornamental feature, or unusual or fragile
material.
› No support for a sign shall extend above the
cornice line of a building to which the sign is
attached.
A sign shall be designed to integrate with the architectural fea-
tures of a building, not distract from them. This sign remains
subordinate to the architectural feature since much of the mold-
ing is still visible.
Avoid damaging or obscuring architectural details or
features when installing signs.
4 4
Mount a sign to fit within existing architectural features using
the shape of the sign to help reinforce the horizontal lines of the
building.
8
4
106
DRAFT
Design Standards for Signs
Whether it is attached to a historic building or as-
sociated with new development, a new or modified
sign shall exhibit qualities of style, permanence and
compatibility with the natural and built environment.
It shall also reflect the overall context of the building
and surrounding area.
6.6 A sign shall be subordinate to the
overall building composition.
› Design a sign to be simple in character.
› Locate a sign to emphasize design elements of
the facade itself.
› Mount a sign to fit within existing architectural
features using the shape of the sign to help
reinforce the horizontal lines of the building.
› All sign types shall be subordinate to the
building and to the street.
6.7 Use sign materials that are
compatible with the architectural
character and materials of the
building.
› Do not use highly reflective materials.
› Use permanent, durable materials.
6.8 Use simple typeface design.
› Avoid hard-to-read or overly intricate
typefaces.
› Use no more than two or three distinct
typefaces on a sign.
6.9 Use colors that contribute to
legibility and design integrity.
› Limit the number of colors used on a sign.
Generally, do not use more than three colors.
› Vibrant colors are discouraged.
6.10 Using a symbol for a sign is
permitted.
› A symbol sign adds interest, can be read
quickly and is remembered better than
written words.
Use sign materials that are compatible with
the architectural character and materials of
the building.
Design of New and Modified Signs
Using a symbol for a sign is permitted.
4
4
107
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
A variety of sign types may be permitted if each sign
contributes to a sense of visual continuity and does
not overwhelm the context.
AWNING SIGN
An awning/canopy sign occurs flat against the surface
of the awning material.
6.11 An awning sign shall be compatible
with the building.
› Use colors and materials that are compatible
with the overall color scheme of the facade.
INTERPRETIVE SIGN
An interpretive sign refers to a sign or group of signs
that provide information to visitors on natural, cultural
and historic resources or other pertinent information.
An interpretive sign can be erected by a non-profit
organization or by a national, state or local govern-
ment agency.
Interpretive signs shall comply with the design stan-
dards for the sign type that is the closest match. The
standards below apply to a common freestanding sign
type.
6.12 Design an interpretive sign to be
simple in character.
› The sign face shall be easily read and viewed
by pedestrians.
› An interpretive sign shall remain subordinate
to its context.
4
Although these interpretive signs are outside of the Old Town
district they’re good examples of permitted interpretive signs.
The signs are simple in character.
Design of Specific Sign Types
4
An awning sign shall be compatible with the building.
4
4
4
108
DRAFT
Design Standards for Signs
MURALS
A mural is a painting located on the side of the building
whose content, reflects a cultural, historic or environ-
mental event(s) or subject matter from the district.
6.13 Mural content shall be appropriate
to the district and its environs.
› The mural may not depict a commercial
product brand name or symbolic logo that is
currently available.
6.14 When used, a mural shall be
incorporated as an element of the
overall building design.
› The mural shall complement the wall on which
it is placed.
› It shall not obscure key features of a historic
building.
6.15 The application of a mural shall not
damage historic materials.
› The use of a mural that can be removed at a
later date is permitted.
Mural content shall be appropriate to the district and its envi-
rons.
4
Use a consolidated tenant panel
or directory sign to help users find
building tenants.
4
A mural shall complement the wall on which it is placed.
4
Design of Specific Sign Types
109
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
TENANT PANEL OR DIRECTORY SIGN
A tenant panel or directory sign displays the tenant
name and location for a building containing multiple
tenants.
6.16 Use a tenant panel or directory sign
to consolidate small individual signs
on a larger building.
› Use a consolidated tenant panel or directory
sign to help users find building tenants.
› Locate a consolidated tenant panel or direc-
tory sign near a primary entrance on the first
floor wall of a building.
PROJECTING / UNDER-CANOPY SIGN
A projecting/under-canopy sign is attached perpen-
dicular to the wall of a building or structure.
6.17 Design a bracket for a projecting/
under-canopy sign to complement
the sign composition.
6.18 Locate a projecting/under-canopy
sign to relate to the building facade
and entries.
› Locate a small projecting/under-canopy sign
near the business entrance, just above or to
the side of the door.
› Mount a larger projecting sign higher on the
building, centered on the facade or positioned
at the corner.
Design a bracket for a pro-
jecting sign to complement
the sign composition.
The combination of the sim-
ple painted wall sign and the
projecting sign are comple-
mentary to each another and
permitted for this building
type.
Locate a small projecting sign near
the business entrance, just above
or to the side of the door.
4 4
4
Design of Specific Sign Types
4
Direct lighting towards a sign from an external,
shielded lamp.
A projecting/under-canopy
sign is attached perpen-
dicular to the wall of a
building or structure.
4
110
DRAFT
Design Standards for Signs
FLUSH WALL SIGN
A flush wall sign is any sign attached parallel to the wall
or surface of a building.
6.19 Place a f lush wall sign to promote
design compatibility among
buildings.
› Place a wall sign to align with other signs on
nearby buildings.
6.20 Place a flush wall sign relatively
close to the building facade.
› Design a wall sign to minimize the depth of a
sign panel or letters.
› Design a wall sign to fit within, rather than
forward of, the fascia or other architectural
details of a building.
Design of Specific Sign Types
Place a wall sign to promote design compatibility among build-
ings.
Design a wall sign to minimize the depth of a sign panel or let-
ters.
4
4
A wall sign is any sign
attached parallel to the wall
or surface of a building.
4
111
DRAFT
Old Town Fort Collins Design Guidelines | March 2014
4
Design a door sign to minimize the amount
of window covered.
Design a window sign to minimize the amount of window
covered.
4
4
WINDOW AND DOOR SIGN
A window sign is any sign, picture, symbol, or combi-
nation thereof, designed to communicate information
about an activity, business, commodity, event, sale or
service that is placed inside within one foot of the
inside window pane or upon the windowpanes or glass
and which is visible from the exterior of the window.
6.21 Design a window sign to minimize
the amount of window covered.
› Scale and position a window sign to preserve
transparency at the sidewalk edge.
Design of Specific Sign Types
112
DRAFT
Design Standards for Signs
KIOSKS
A sign kiosk is typically a series of configured sign
panels.
6.22 A sign kiosk is prohibited within
the district.
› Unless used by the city for wayfinding or for
interpretive information.
OTHER SIGN TYPES
All sign types that are not mentioned here, but which
are permitted in the district, shall adhere to the stan-
dards in “Design of New and Modified Signs” in this
chapter.
ILLUMINATION
6.23 Include a compatible, shielded light
source to illuminate a sign.
› Direct lighting towards a sign from an exter-
nal, shielded lamp.
› Do not overpower the building or street edge
with lighting.
› Use a warm light, similar to daylight.
› If halo lighting is used to accentuate a sign or
building, locate the light source so that it is not
visible.
› A sign shall be illuminated from an indirect
light source.
6.24 If internal illumination is used, it
shall be designed to be subordinate
to the overall building composition.
› Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is
prohibited. If internal illumination is used, a
system that backlights text only is permitted.
› Internal illumination of an awning is prohibited;
however, lights may be concealed in the
underside of a canopy.
Illumination
Form Completed July 29, 2013 This form is based on research by the City of Olympia and Evergreen State College
Triple Bottom Line Analysis Map (TBLAM)
Project or Decision: River District and Old Town Historic District Design
Guidelines Evaluated by:
Staff from CDNS and
TBL Team
Social Economic Environmental
WorkForce Community
STRENGTHS:
x S&Gs add some clarity to development
review process
x S&Gs simplify the Landmark Preservation
Commission review process
x S&Gs follow existing economic drivers
that add value to development proposals
previously identified in community plans
and strategies
x S&Gs are a vision implementation
exercise
x S&Gs further support Secretary of
Interior’s standards that staff must follow;
helps apply standards in actual case
studies within the community
STRENGTHS:
x S&Gs identify new building materials
and techniques that are
environmentally responsible
x S&Gs encourage the use and reuse of
existing buildings; preserves historic
nature of communities and
neighborhoods, perpetuates character
of historic buildings
x S&Gs do not add extra work for
development review applications;
makes the process more efficient and
contributes to continued transparency
x S&Gs add some clarity to development
review process
x S&Gs add new regulations and require
some more work with the intent of
preserving character
x S&Gs improve building compatibility
within the districts; promotes a
cohesive identity within the districts
x S&Gs add predictability that promotes
infill and redevelopment opportunities
that meet larger community goals
x S&Gs follow existing economic drivers
that add value to development
proposals previously identified in
community plans and strategies
x S&Gs are a vision implementation
exercise
x S&Gs identify properties that qualify for
financial incentives and guide
alterations such that they still qualify
for them>>>>
STRENGTHS:
x Half of Old Town Historic District project
funded by State Historical Fund grant
Form Completed July 29, 2013 This form is based on research by the City of Olympia and Evergreen State College
LIMITATIONS:
x S&Gs still do not resolve the problems of
capital improvement lag within the Old
Town and River District areas
x Capital project needs are outside the
scope of this project
x S&Gs do not go far enough for some
professionals working within the
community; too middle ground for some
LIMITATIONS:
x S&Gs do not resolve all concerns
identified in stakeholder outreach
feedback
x S&Gs still do not resolve the problems of
capital improvement lag within the Old
Town and River District areas
x Capital project needs are outside the
scope of this project
x S&Gs add new regulations and require
some more work with the intent of
preserving character
x S&Gs do not go far enough for some
professionals working within the
community; too middle ground for some
LIMITATIONS
x S&Gs still do not resolve the problems of
capital improvement lag within the Old Town
and River District areas
x Capital project needs are outside the scope of
this project
x S&Gs add new regulations and require some
more work with the intent of preserving
character
LIMITATIONS:
x
OPPORTUNITIES:
x S&Gs add predictability to review
process, may result in reduced staff time
x S&Gs encourage the use and reuse of
existing buildings; may create research
and development opportunities
OPPORTUNITIES:
x Predictability will reduce costs for
applicants
x S&Gs may be used as template in
other CO communities – collaboration
potential, and leadership
x S&Gs encourage the use and reuse of
existing buildings; may create research
and development opportunities
x S&Gs may stimulate a conversation
around existing and future land uses
and compatibility between the two
OPPORTUNITIES:
x Predictability will reduce costs for applicants
x S&Gs may be used as template in other CO
communities
x S&Gs encourage the use and reuse of
existing buildings; leverages funds and
TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE ANALYSIS
Derived from a TBLAM Brainstorm on
River District and Old Town Historic District Design Guidelines
In Collaboration with Staff from CDNS
Purpose: To extract key triple bottom line information from a TBLAM, and use that information to
offer recommendations on key indicators and suggested action items for the design standards
and guidelines under consideration for the River District & Old Town Historic District.
I. General Observations from TBL Analysis (TBLA):
A. The TBLA exercise was not as well balanced as previous analyses.
B. Many considerations crossed into many columns, but there was little crossing between rows.
1. Crossing columns indicates excellent depth of discussion and debate.
2. Crossing of rows indicates potential for conflicting values.
C. The TBLA indicates many strengths, especially community-centric social strengths.
1. Key items like new building material promotion, added predictability of requirements, use and reuse
of existing structures, and preservation of neighborhood character were repeated across columns.
2. Future opportunities were few, but substantially outweighed the total identified threats.
D. Limitations highlight two critical problems at this stage of the development process, including capital
improvement lag and standards not extending the full breadth of what some professionals expect.
E. Connectivity between this plan, the downtown plan, and the surrounding neighborhoods is critical.
F. Environmental considerations must be expanded through additional analysis.
G. The TBLA brainstorm does not gage existing public engagement, nor does it identify any additional
stakeholders that need to be involved.
II. Conclusions Offered:
A. A multitude of strengths can suggest the TBLA is one-sided and overly optimistic.
1. New stakeholder input will help round out potential limitations and threats.
2. If the total volume of strengths is representative of the merits of the proposed guidelines, then it is
worthy of highlighting right away.
B. The community strengths are skewed to the River District and Old Town Historic Area as currently
captured in the TBLA.
1. Perceptions from and impacts upon the remainder of Fort Collins are not captured in this TBLA.
2. The analysis should be supported by engaging stakeholders outside the affected area before the
strengths of the proposed guidelines can be fully realized on a community basis.
C. Capital projects were a repeated theme, and the success of implementing new guidelines is clearly
connected to those improvements.
1. This interconnectedness suggests a strong need to align with existing master plans, City Plan, and
other capital improvement plans to find collaboration potential and to coordinate multiple efforts.
2. Scheduling of improvements in other departments presents a potential fatal flaw if guidelines are
rolled out predicated upon certain projects being completed within a specified window of time.
III. Potential Key Indicators Suggested:
A. The success of implementing updated guidelines is directly affected by scheduled capital improvements
around the City.
B. Gentrification concerns must be addressed early in the planning process, and before approval by decision-
making authorities.
C. Alignment with existing plans and schedules will substantially reduce limitations and add security to the
future success of guidelines if they are rolled out.
D. New stakeholders outside affected areas (River District and Old Town) must be engaged before the
community strengths suggested by this TBLA can be validated or verified.
1. Critical to success of ultimate project.
2. Provides new stakeholders that can validate the optimistic nature of the current TLBA.
1
Old Town Historic District
Design Standards
Project Update
Josh Weinberg
Historic Preservation Planner
City Council Work Session
April 8, 2014
ATTACHMENT 7
2
Area Boundaries
3
Update to Existing Design Standards
4
Project Goals
•Assist evaluation of projects in the historic district.
•Help maintain the special qualities of the area.
•Highlight successful rehabilitation and infill projects.
•Promote sustainable design and preservation.
5
Ca.1980
2013
Ca.1950s
Case Study
Old Fire Station/ City Hall – 232-236 Walnut
6
Case Study – Cont.
J.L. Hohnstein Block – 220 East Mountain
Pre-
1970s
1980
2013
7
2013
1980s 1980s
Case Study - Cont.
The Linden Hotel
8
Technical Guidance
9
Sustainability and Energy Efficiency
10
Standards for Compatible Infill
11
Downtown River District Design
Standards and Guidelines
Staff: Ted Shepard
12
Existing Plans
13
Neighborhood Scale/Connectivity
14
Site Design Guidelines
15
Building Design Guidelines
16
Comparisons of Standards
17
Existing Development Sets the Tone
18
New Development Must…
• Preserve an Overall Sense
of Continuity
• Maintain a Compatible
Scale
• Provide Street-Fronts and
Pedestrian Orientation
• Promote Visual Unity Yet
Allow For Individuality
• Ensure New Construction
Is a Product of Its Own
Time
19
The Road Show
20
Phase III Public Engagement
• Public workshop – April
• Post final draft to website – April
• Ordinance to LPC – May
• Ordinance to P&Z – May
• Council first reading – June 3rd
21
Direction Sought
• Does Council have recommendations for
improving the illustrations, graphic layout, or
content of either document?
• Does Council have other ideas on how best to
preserve the distinctive character of districts as
they continue to attract both new development
and re-development of existing properties?
generates heritage tourism
x
OPPORTUNITIES:
x S&Gs encourage the use and reuse of
existing buildings; may create research and
development opportunities
THREATS:
x
THREATS:
THREATS:
THREATS:
x
NOTES:
x S&Gs encourage the use and reuse of
existing buildings; leverages funds and
generates heritage tourism
x S&Gs do not add extra work for development
review applications; makes the process more
efficient and contributes to continued
transparency
x S&Gs add new regulations and require some
more work with the intent of preserving
character
x S&Gs add predictability that promotes infill
and redevelopment opportunities
x S&Gs follow existing economic drivers that
add value to development proposals
previously identified in community plans and
strategies
x S&Gs are a vision implementation exercise
x S&Gs identify properties that qualify for
financial incentives and guide alterations that
promote continual eligibility for incentives
STRENGTHS:
x S&Gs identify new building materials and
techniques that are environmentally
sustainable
x S&Gs encourage the use and reuse of
existing buildings; reduces landfill volume
capture, reduces new material consumption,
contributes to retaining embodied energies
x S&Gs add predictability that promotes infill
and redevelopment opportunities
ATTACHMENT 6
4
appears as several authentic building modules.
New Building
4
Changes in cornice lines combined with varia-
tions in wall planes can help a new, larger
building appear consistent with traditional
development patterns.
and another for the roof is preferred.
› Using one to three accent colors for trim
elements is also preferred.
building areas.
› Minimize structural impacts when installing
turbines.
walls, ceilings and foundations, rather than replac-
ing windows.
sulation, weatherization improvements and landscaping
should be employed.
Step 5: Add Energy-Generating Technologies
Sensitively.
The flexibility of many historic structures allows for
the respectful integration of energy efficient tech-
nologies. Energy-generating technologies are the most
commonly known strategies. However, the efficiency
of a historic structure will often be great enough that
generation technologies aren’t the most practical solu-
tions. Utilize strategies to reduce energy consumption
prior to undertaking an energy generation project.
ing structure.
Appropriate addition to the front of a one-story
non-contributing structure.
4
4
4
Preserve an older
addition that has
achieved historic
significance in its
own right.
Design an addition or secondary structure to be subordinate to
the historic building.
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/
briefs/10-paint-problems.htm
4
4
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/
briefs/11-storefronts.htm
Understanding the character of these materials
and the patterns they create is essential to devel-
oping new interpretations.
toric materials.
8
Re-point mortar joints where there is evi-
dence of deterioration. This shall match the
historic design.
4
Historic building materials are key features
of historic buildings and shall be preserved.
Exterior of Small and Medium Size Historic Buildings
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/
briefs/47-maintaining-exteriors.htm
“Rehabilitation” is the process of returning a property
to a state that makes a contemporary use possible
while still preserving those portions or features of the
property which are significant to its historical, archi-
tectural and cultural values. Rehabilitation may include
a change in use of the building or additions. This term
is the broadest of the permitted treatments and applies
to most work on historic properties.
Combining Treatments
For many projects a “rehabilitation” approach will be
the overall strategy, because this term reflects the
broadest, most flexible of the approaches. Within that,
however, there may be a combination of treatments
used as they relate to specific building components.
For example, a surviving cornice may be preserved, a
storefront base that has been altered may be restored,
and a missing kickplate may be reconstructed.
E
Sidebars
These provide additional infor-
mation that will be helpful in
understanding the standard. In
some cases a sidebar includes links
that direct the user to additional
material; this may be technical
information about a rehabilitation
procedure or other helpful infor-
mation.
4
Construct a
new building 4 4 4 4 (1)
Other
Track
Signs 4 4
(1) (1) (1) 4
Site Work 4 4
(1) (1) (1) 4
Miscellaneous 4 4 4
(1) Standards may apply to some projects in this category.
which has been substantially altered could be restored
with a sufficient degree of care, such that it may be
re-classified as a contributing property once improve-
ments are completed. An owner may elect to take
such an approach; the city will work with the owner to
determine if this is appropriate. For this special condi-
tion, the Preservation Track will apply.
This option is not mandatory and up to the building
owner.
been undertaken to comply with the regulation, that
the costs of compliance clearly outweigh the potential
benefits to the public or would unreasonably burden
the proposed project, and reasonable steps have been
undertaken to minimize any potential harm or adverse
impacts resulting from noncompliance with the regula-
tion.
May Be Considered
The phrase “may be considered” appears in some
standards text. This indicates that the City will discre-
tion determine if the “land-use activity” is permissible.
This decision is made using the information specifically
related to the project and its context.
derstood as defining a particular span of time, other
features are more subtle but still continue to influence
patterns of development.
The aerial images shown underscore the value of the
features that still survive because they provide a hint to
the early character.
To preserve the historic building fabric and to provide din-
ing, retail and entertainment uses was a goal of the 1985
redevelopment plan.
Illustrative plan from the 1985 redevelopment plan set a vision
for Old Town.
compass, rather than along the environmental dictates
that guided Dow and Meldrum. By including most of
the original surveyed area of Fort Collins, Avery cre-
ated the distinct triangular shaped lots and streets that
characterize Old Town.
Spring of 1873 saw an influx of population, and many
new business buildings were erected in Old Town. Dur-
ing that year 68 frame buildings were constructed in
Fort Collins, with a majority in the Old Town area, but
gusty autumn winds blew several down. The ones that
remained were later removed to build the more sturdy
brick buildings that stand today. Near harvest time of
the same year a plague of grasshoppers descended
upon the crops and devoured them. The businesses of
the community suffered along with the farmers, as the
grasshoppers made repeat performances in 1874 and
1875. Many families and businesses in Old Town left,
Ansel Watrous wrote, “Building was practically at a
standstill and business of all kinds was in the dumps.”
The arrival of the Colorado Central Railroad in 1877
began a new era of prosperity for Fort Collins, and
in particular for Old Town, as the Terminal was in
close proximity to the business district. Investments
in housing and business buildings rose, as did the spirit
of the people who lived and worked in Old Town. The
following year saw the building of some substantial
brick business blocks in Old Town, and a promise of
more to come.
» Environmental Sustainability. Rehabilita-
tion of historic resources conserves energy
that is embodied in the construction of
existing structures. It also reduces impacts on
land fill from demolition and reduces the need
to fabricate new materials.
» Economic Sustainability. The economic
benefits of protecting historic resources
include higher property values, job creation
in rehabilitation industries and increased
heritage tourism.
For More Information:
See web link to National Park Service Sustainabil-
ity information:
http://www.nps.gov/tps/sustainability.htm
this energy. Re-using a building also preserves the
energy and resources invested in its construction, and
reduces the need for producing new construction ma-
terials, which require more energy to produce. Studies
confirm that the loss of embodied energy by demoli-
tion takes three decades or more to recoup, even with
the reduced operating energy costs in a replacement
building.
For More Information:
See the following web link to Preservation Brief 3:
Improving Energy Efficiency in Historic Buildings:
http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/3-
improve-energy-efficiency.htm
shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be
disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken.
9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new
construction shall not destroy historic materials that char-
acterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated
from the old and shall be compatible with the massing,
size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic
integrity of the property and its environment.
10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction
shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in
the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic
property and its environment would be unimpaired.”
PRESERVATION BRIEFS & TECH NOTES
The Cultural Resources Department of the National
Park Service, in the U.S. Department of the Interior,
publishes a series of technical reports regarding proper
preservation techniques. This series, Preservation Briefs
and Tech Notes, is a mainstay for many preservationists
in the field. When considering a preservation project,
these resources should be consulted.
tion into new developments. It provides a good basis
for design standards and guidelines as it sets the broad
principles for the treatment of historic resources,
but gives only very limited guidance or direction for
rehabilitation of historic properties themselves.
Home Rule Charter and the Code of the City of
Fort Collins 1986
Chapter 14 Landmark Preservation
This section of the code sets forth the following dec-
laration of policy for Historic Preservation within the
City:
(a) It is hereby declared as a matter of public policy that
the protection, enhancement and perpetuation of sites,
structures, objects and districts of historical, architectural
or geographic significance, located within the City, are a
public necessity and are required in the interest of the
prosperity, civic pride and general welfare of the people.
(b) It is the opinion of the city council that the economic,
cultural and aesthetic standing of this City cannot be main-
tained or enhanced by disregarding the historical, architec-
tural and geographical heritage of the City and by ignoring
the destruction or defacement of such cultural assets.
It also identifies:
› standards for determining eligibility,
› designation procedures,
› construction, alterations, demolitions and
relocation procedures, and a
› landmark rehabilitation program
See the following web site links for financial as-
sistance programs that may be available for the
rehabilitation of a historic resource:
• History Colorado web site to assist in rehabilita-
tion projects:
http://www.historycolorado.org/archaeologists/
grants-financial-incentives
• National Park Service web site for tax credit
information to assist in rehabilitation projects:
http://www.nps.gov/tps/tax-incentives.htm
› Landscape features
› Public art
› Trails
› Overlooks
be incorporated into the structure. They should complement the
overall composition and design of the building. Accent features
can include an entry ways, loading docks, garage bays, balconies,
canopies, cupolas, secondary connections and vertical elevator
shafts, for example. They can be highlighted with a change in
material, color or other architectural treatment appropriate to
the context.
3.1 Design accent features to complement the
overall composition and design of the building
and context.
› Use complementary building materials and colors.
› Consider the mass and scale of the feature in respect to
the overall building composition.
› Do not overuse an accent feature.
4
Design accent features to
complement the overall
composition and design of the
building and context.
bypassed, creating a more direct channel. This resulted
in the relocation of the river from the site now known
as the “Oxbow” to the south in its present location.
A diverse range of building types existed, reflecting the mix
of uses and the changing economy in the area.
In 2008, a streetscape improvements project report
for the River District was prepared for the City of Fort
Collins. The goal of that project is to create a new sense
of place by making the area welcoming, visually pleasing
and ready for infill development. The streetscape plan
recommends improvements to streetscapes, traffic
circulation, parking, bicycle, pedestrian and transit,
as well as utility infrastructure upgrades. Highlights
include inviting and attractive streetscapes designed to
serve all types of transportation - pedestrians, bicy-
clists, drivers and transit riders.
the review and permitting process is different, as de-
scribed below.
Locally listed landmark
Some properties in the area are listed as local histori-
cal landmarks, under the city’s preservation ordinance.
(The Ranch-Way Feeds property is an example.)
Improvements to these locally listed landmarks are
subject to review by the Landmark Preservation Com-
mission.
Locally listed “contributor” to a local historic
district
A few properties that lie within the River District also
are within the locally designed Old Town Historic Dis-
trict. (The Depot on Jefferson Street is an example.)
For these properties, improvements also are subject
to review by the Landmark Preservation Commission.