Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 11/06/2001 - ITEMS RELATING TO UTILITY RATES FOR 2002 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM NUMBER: 34 A-C FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL DATE: November 6,2001 STAFF: Wendy Williams David Agee SUBJECT: Items Relating to Utility Rates for 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Water Board recommend adoption of the Ordinances on First Reading. FINANCIAL IMPACT: These Ordinances increase annual Water Fund operating revenues by approximately 6%, Wastewater Fund operating revenues increase by about 2% and Storm Drainage Fund operating revenues increase 45%. Approval of the rate ordinances will ensure that the Water,Wastewater and Storm Drainage Funds will meet or exceed debt service coverage requirements. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A. First Reading of Ordinance No. 192, 2001, Amending Chapter 26, Article III, Division 4 Relating to User Rates and Charges for Water. B. First Reading of Ordinance No. 193,2001,Amending Chapter 26,Article IV,Division 4 of the Code of the City Relating to Wastewater Fees and Charges. C. First Reading of Ordinance No. 194, 2001, Amending Chapter 26, Article VII, Division 2 of the Code of the City Relating to Stormwater Fees. As proposed in the 2002-2003 budget, the three ordinances increase the City's utility rates for customers inside the City limits by 6%for water service and 2%for wastewater service. Stormwater rates increase by 45% for all customers. Electric rates do not change. The proposed changes will become effective on billings issued on or after January 1, 2002. The Water Board reviewed and recommended the rate changes in conjunction with its discussion on the 2002-2003 budget. Additionally,the proposed water and wastewater ordinances eliminate the rate differences between inside and outside city customers. Historically,the rates paid by customers outside the City limits were one and one half times higher than the water and wastewater rates paid by customers inside DATE: November 6, 2001 2 ITEM NUMBER: 34 A-C the City limits. The cost to provide service inside and outside the City limits no longer supports the different rate levels. In 1994 Council directed staff to"freeze"the outside City rates until the inside rates "caught up". With the proposed increases for 2002, the outside rates are now close to equivalent to rates inside the City limits and in a few cases,customers outside the City may pay less than they would on inside City rates. Staff recommends that the water and wastewater rates for customers outside the City limits be established at the same levels as for like customers inside the City limits beginning in 2002. The table below shows the impacts of the proposed rate adjustments on a typical single family residential customer's monthly bill. I Typical Residential Increase Increase Utility Customer 2001 2002 $ % Water (160,000 gal. per year) $32.16 $34.09 $1.93 6.0% Wastewater $16.19 $16.51 $0.32 2.0% I (5,600 gal./mo. WQC) Electric $31.98 $31.98 $0.00 0% (500 kWh per month) Stormwater (8,600 sq. ft. lot, light $8.13 $11.79 $3.66 45.0% runoff) Total Utility Bill $88.46 $94.37 $5.91 6.7% BACKGROUND: Water If approved by City Council,water rates for all customer classes inside the City limits will increase by 6%. The increase is necessary to pay debt service for the Water Treatment Facility Master Plan and to fund the operations and maintenance of the City's water system. Separate rates for customers outside the City limits will be eliminated and customers outside of the City limits will pay the same rates as similar customers within the City limits. Historically these customers had higher rates than inside city users. A housekeeping change is also included in the water rate ordinance. The term"minimum"has been replaced by "base" in order to clarify that the fixed monthly portion of the rate is in addition to the charges for water usage. It is anticipated that future water rates will increase an average of 6% in 2003. No water rate increases are currently projected during the years 2004-2006. Wastewater This ordinance will increase wastewater rates for all customers inside the City limits by 2%in 2002. The increase is needed to fund the operations and maintenance of the City's wastewater system and DATE: November 6, 2001 3 ITEM NUMBER: 34 A-C to finance capital improvements. Separate rates for customers outside the City limits will be eliminated and customers outside of the City limits will pay the same rates as similar customers within the City limits. Historically these customers had higher rates than inside city users. The wastewater rate ordinance also eliminates the classification of users "Category I: Special Without Agreement". There are no customers in this rate class and it is no longer needed. Current projections indicate an additional 2% wastewater increase in 2003. An annual 2.5% rate increase is projected for the years 2004-2006. Stormwater The proposed ordinance increases stormwater fees by 45% for all customers. The increase is necessary to fund the operations and maintenance of the City's stormwater system, to pay debt service and to accelerate the citywide capital improvements program. Current projections indicate an annual 10%increase will be necessary in the years 2003 and 2004,7%in 2005,and 6%in 2006. The proposed rate increases are in accordance with the Stormwater Financing Plan adopted by City Council Resolution 2001-93. The ordinance also eliminates the minimum monthly bill for stormwater service. The minimum applied to only five customers with lot sizes less than 380 square feet. This is a house keeping change to simplify administration of the rates. Electric • No electric rate increases are projected for 2002 or 2003. It is currently projected that a 2%increase may be necessary in 2004 and in 2006. Summary Although it has been necessary for the City to raise utility rates over the years, a comparison with inflation shows that increases to the total City utility bill for a typical residential customer have been less than inflation since 1985. The graph below shows the overall increases in monthly utility charges for a typical single family residential customer in comparison with inflation. The typical residential customer is defined as electric use of 500 kWh per month,metered water use of 160,000 gallons per year, wastewater with 5,600 gal./mo. winter quarter consumption, and stormwater for a 8,600 sq. ft. lot with light runoff. • DATE: November 6, 2001 4 ITEM NUMBER: 34 A-C Fort Collins Utilities Compared with Inflation (Typical Residential Customer with Electric, Metered Water,Winter Quarter Wastewater,and Stormwater) $120 $100 $so $60 $40 $20 I $0 i 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 Proposed Total Utility Bill t Inflation 2002 I i ORDINANCE NO. 192, 2001 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AMENDING CHAPTER 26,ARTICLE III, DIVISION 4 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS RELATING TO USER RATES AND CHARGES FOR WATER BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That Section 26-126 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 26-126. Schedule A, flat rates for unmetered water use. When the use of city water is not metered, the monthly rate to be charged for each flat rate water service shall be the sum of the total charge for the dwelling units (A)plus the lot charge (B): A = For a building containing only one(1)dwelling unit:Twenty-fem dollars and eighty four eents($24.84)Twenty-six dollars and thirty-; ' a',`-L*]yhts 4 ($26.33); for a building containing only two(2) dwelling units: 44rof Thirty-seven dollars sAd t4veaty- seven,cents($37:27). B = For each lot: Add to the dwelling unit charge fifteen and ___.__ tenths eents (S9.157)- sixteen and six-tcaths cents.($0.166) per one hundred (100)square feet of lot area if the building includes one(1)dwelling unit. If the building includes two (2) dwelling units, add to the dwelling unit charge fourteen and seven-tenths cents($9.147)per one hundred(100) square feet of lot area. Section 2. That Section 26-127 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 26-127. Schedule B, meter rates. (a) Affnintuin Base charge. The minimunt-baW,monthly charge for all metered users inside the city limits shall be as follows: (1) Residential customers.Residential customers shall pay a mkiintum- e monthly charge of fourteen dollars and sixty-nine cents($14.69)for the first dwelling unit. Duplex residential customers shall pay an additional eents ($2-..48) two dollars and sixty three,cents( ,63) for the second dwelling unit. Multifamily residential customers shall pay four dollars for the second and each additional dwelling unit. (2) Nonresidential customers. Nonresidential customers shall pay a miaitnten monthly charge based on meter size as follows: Meter Size Monthly (inches) minimum' Charges 3/4 $-12.24 12.97 1 34-.16 d :_ 1'/2 75.98 80 4 2 134.94 3 1:71.49 4 28:7.61 _ 0*Jk7 6 754.10 809 95 8 1152.40 1221.54 (3) Construction rate.For residential premises under construction(single family and duplex), a*h dollars attd thirty- four cer►ts ($8,34);for the first dwelling unit and three dollars and six4yeneeents 11 (53.61) three-dollars and eighty-three cents($193) for the second dwelling unit. For multifamily and nonresidential premises under construction,one-half(1/2)ofthe nonresidential minimum base monthly charge for the applicable meter size. (b) Quantity charge. The monthly water usage shall be billed at the rate of one dollar and twenty three and six tenths eents(S 1.23 6) 9K p. Xs;en§ ($T,3#11)per one thousand(1,000) gallons. For nonresidential customers, monthly water usage in excess of the specified amounts below shall be billed at ene dollar and seventy seven and six tenths eerft($1.7 76)-jq'Q"Q ., jght thrq WIP-11per one thousand (1,000) gallons based on meter size as follows: Meter Size Specified Amount (inches) (gallons per month) 3/4 100,000 1 300,000 1 625,000 • 2 1,200,000 3 1,400,000 4 2,500,000 (c) Colorado State University. In addition to the charges described in paragraphs (a)and(b)of this Section, Colorado State University shall also pay a monthly meter fee of one thousand one hundred ten dollars ($1,110.) representing the city's costs associated with providing metered water connections to the University's foothills campus. (d) Service outside the city. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph(c) of this Section, the monthly charge for water taken through a meter by a user outside the city limits shall be as fe}iews °t}e hke.Fync!. ' biq tjt�,, m`" users outside the eity limits shall be as fol4owse dwelling trait b. A;9tiresidenfiai eustopners. Exeept as provided in paragraph (e) of tit based an meter size as fi5llews! Meter Size Alr whly (tnehes� nillm"? C-hWT s �4 $14.15 } _ 54.99 —88.39 3 168.28 4 282.2; 8 90943 • first dwelling unit and five dellarg md twelve eents ($5.12) fer ette! merAhly eharge for the ftMlieable meter size. SFeeified amounts below shall be Ibilled at orte dollar and fimof and six tenths eents follows! Meter Size Sneeef edAmeane ( q) Y4 �eaaee + —3eeaee 3 �499;69A 2,509,090 metster meter,the fnorktMy eharge for the eity water FaSsed through the master meter shall be eamputed es follows! ft. 44te average-volume of water ttsM Fer tap is determined by dividing am um of water metered thfough the mEater meter by the number of taps, b. The eharge for etteh tap is then deferrmirted by ttPFIY'ng to the tmerage volurne of water used Fer ftp, the rate appheable te etteh tetp for like serviee inside the eity limits, and e. The _ _ _ to be billed to the master y__ _ meter _ r is the _um of aL_ Section 3. That paragraph(b)of Section 26-129 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: • Sec. 26-129. Schedule D, miscellaneous fees and charges. (b) The fire hydrant fees and charges shall be as follows: (1) For installation of meter $10.00 (2) For removal of meter 10.00 (3) For daily rental for meter and fittings 7.50 (4) For water service inside the city, rate per one thousand (1,000) gallons water used 1.310 1389 gailens(eater used 1.485 (65) A deposit may be required in the amount of the charges for the anticipated water usage and rental. • Section 4. That the amendments to Chapter 26 of the City Code contained herein shall go into effect with respect to all City utility bills issued on or after January 1, 2002. Introduced,considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published in summary form this 6th day of November, A.D. 2001, and to be presented for final passage on the 20th day of November, A.D. 2001 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading this 20th day of November, A.D. 2001. Mayor • ATTEST: City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 193, 2001 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AMENDING CHAPTER 26, ARTICLE IV, DIVISION 4 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS RELATING TO USER FEES AND CHARGES FOR WASTEWATER BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That subparagraph (9) in Section 26-278 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby deleted in its entirety: Sec. 26-278. Classification of users. or without the eity limits,that htffe mt ttegetiate4 an agreefflent with tile Gity eatteerning rates,eharges emd fees for the provision of wastewater ealleetion Section 2. That Section 26-280 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 26-280. Service charges established by category. The schedule of rates for each category described in§26-279 shall be as follows: Category Class ofcustomer Rate A Single-family $16.35 $16.68'permonth residential user(flat rate) Single-family $ ?2- i.36 er month plus$1.438 tj,_ residential user per 1,000 gallons of winter quarter water (metered water use) use B Duplex(two-family) $25.92 '$26'44per month residential users(flat rate) Duplex(two-family) $9.64 $9.81 per month plus $ .438 residential users $1.467 per 1,000 gallons of winter quarter (metered water use) water use C Multifamily residential $1438 :467per 1,000 gallons of winter user(more than two quarter water use,plus a m4t4nttm base dwelling units charge of$-1c14$1.16 per month per including mobile home dwelling unit served parks)and winter quarter based nonresidential user D Minor nonresidential The greater of 51.438 $1.467 per 1,000 user gallons of water use,measured sewage flow or winter quarter water use,whichever is applicable,plus the following applicable base charge: Size of water meter Base (inches) Charge 3/4 or $ 48S $4595 smaller 1 11.08 11.30 11/2 22-03 22.90 2 34.58 38.33 3 62.46 63271 4 194.84 106 97 6 51433 524.51 8 55838 569.55 • E Intermediate 5+438-# 7„per 1,000 gallons of water and nonresidential user use,measured wastewater flow or winter F Significant industrial quarter water use,whichever is applicable; user plus a surcharge of $1349$1.407 per million gallons for each milligram per liter of suspended solids in excess of 250 milligrams per liter;plus a surcharge of $4.158'$1.181 per million gallons for each milligram per liter of BOD in excess of 200 milligrams per liter or a surcharge of $6-3-14$0.728 per million gallons for each milligram per liter of COD in excess of 300 milligrams per liter,or a surcharge of $4 943 2114 per million gallons for each milligram per liter of TOC in excess of 100 milligrams per liter,whichever is applicable. The user shall either pay this calculated amount plus the applicable base charge set forth below: Size of water meter Base (inches) Charge 3/4 or $ 48-5 $4.95 smaller 1 1-1.08 11.30 11/2 22.45 22.90 2 39-58 38.33 3 62..46 63.71 4 104.87 106.97 6 514-23 524.51 8 33838 -569.55 G User outside city. limits: shaltIb the same as• service inside the co.,'Ih as is inc t}ties A-Fiandf Fi in this Single fienily residential usev (metered water use)- Duphex(two fatnily� residential users galiens of winter qtta"er water use . (metered water use) ' user(mere then two water-=- dwelling tmi Fw4es)and wiftter que"er based nonresidential ttser Miner enresidentie! user quarter water use,whieltever is apF!ieabk- Size f Alwrinnem water meter Ammm finehesj Gherge 3,4er 8.:i smaller +- i r.9 +4- 2 19.64 2- 3r.4 i } t 6- 253.08 intermediate S2.024 per 1,999 gallons ofwaler use, user &re ej hm!imnm (hrehes) G �_tle_ � T —fT.i9 19.64 2- 3T 1 3- T 42 -2T3.98 H Special with agreement The rate shall be negotiated 1 Speeial withent $1.645 Fer 4,099 gallons of winter quarter agreement water ttse Section 3. That Section 26-282(a) of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 26-282. Wastewater strength or industrial surcharges and categories • established. (a) The schedule of wastewater strength surcharge for customers located either inside or outside the city limits shall be as follows: Excess over Rate per Parameter (mg/1) 1,000gallons BOD 200 60404138S0,001:181 COD 300 0.000714 0.000728 TOC 100 0.002073 0.00211,4 TSS 250 0.001349 0.001 7 Section 4. That the amendments to Chapter 26 of the City Code contained herein shall go into effect with respect to all City utility bills issued on or after January 1, 2002. • Introduced, considered favorably on first reading,and ordered published in summary form this 6th day of November, A.D. 2001, and to be presented for final passage on the 20th day of November, A.D. 2001. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading this 20th day of November, A.D. 2001. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk . ORDINANCE NO. 194, 2001 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AMENDING CHAPTER 26 ARTICLE VII DIVISION 2 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY RELATING TO STORMWATER FEES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That subparagraph (3) of Section 26-514 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 26-514. Determination of stormwater utility fee. (3) The base rate for the stormwater utility fee shall be $0ao 09236i7 M0034259 per square foot per month for all areas of the city. Section 2. That subparagraph (7) of Section 26-514 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby deleted in its entirety: !at or pareel per menth. Section 3. That the amendments to Chapter 26 of the City Code contained herein shall go into effect with respect to all City utility bills issued on or after January 1, 2002. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published in summary form this 6th day of November, A.D. 2001, and to be presented for final passage on the 20th day of November, A.D. 2001. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading this 20th day of November,A.D. 2001. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk City Council Liaison Water Board Chairman Water Board Vice Chairman Chuck Wanner Tom Sanders - 491-5448 John Morris - 491-0185 Staff Liaison Secretary DeEtta Carr - 221-6702 Kim Vondy - 221-6383 ROLL CALL Board Present Tom Sanders-Chairman, John Morris-Vice Chairman, Paul Clopper, Joseph Berquist, Bill Fischer, David Lauer, Rami Naddy, Ted Brostad, Thomas Brown, Robert Ward Staff Present Dennis Bode, Wendy Williams, Dave Agee, Ellen Switzer, DeEtta Carr, Patty Bigner, Bill Switzer, Brian Janonis, Kim Vondy Guests Present Douglas Yadon, Sr. Geotechnical Engineer- Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. Board Absent David Frick • MEETING OPENED/ROLL CALL Chairman Tom Sanders opened the meeting. The following items were discussed: MINUTES APPROVED Paul Clopper made a motion to approve the minutes; Bill Fischer seconded the motion. Motion carved. 2002-2003 BUDGET REVIEW Ellen Switzer noted that the Financial Statements have been included in packets. In November, Council will adopt the 2002-2003 Budget. Utilities have five funds. Appropriations can be transferred within a fund but can not be transferred between capital projects. Each of the utility funds is separate from each other. The four enterprise funds are Water, Wastewater, Storm Drainage, and Light and Power and one Internal Service Fund, (the Utility Customer Service and Administrative Fund). Costs of the Customer Service and Administration Fund are allocated to the four enterprise funds based on estimated cost of service. The allocation is Water- 23%, Wastewater - 15%, Storm Drainage - 10%, and Light and Power- 52%. Final transfers will be based on actual 2002 and 2003 expenses not budget. The Water Fund is projecting a 0% rate adjustment in 2004 and a 6% increase in 2002 and 2003. Ellen displayed on overhead a graph of the "Regional Annual Water Bill Comparison(2001 Rates) Based on Residential Use of 132,000 gallons" which shows the City water rates are at the median. Policy highlights for the Water Fund indicate that the projected revenue exceeds the debt service • requirements. Debt service requirements are that we have water bond coverage greater than 1.1. FORT COLLINS WATER BOARD MINUTES PAGE 2 MAY 24, 2001 Ellen reviewed the Water Fund 2002 budget graph totaling $32.7 million in 2002 and increasing to $33.5 million in 2003. Operations are about$8.5 million of the full water fund budget with personal services making up a large portion for the O& M Budget. Water treatment plant has reduced their staff by two and those positions have been transferred elsewhere. No significant changes in O & M Budget. The Water Fund payment in lieu of taxes to the City's general fund equals 6%of the utility's operating revenue and totals$1.34 Million per year. The Utility also pays the City's general fund for services they provide to utilities which totals about$878,000 per year. A transfer to the Customer Service and Admin Fund equals about$2.7 Million per year and principal and interest on an outstanding debt totals about$9 Million a year. Average interest rate is less than 4%. The Minor Capital Budget for 2002 & 2003 is $2.4Million. Capital Projects is $7 Million per year and includes Meter Conversion, SW System Improvements, Halligan Reservoir, Gravel Pit Storage Ponds, Water Treatment Plant Facilities, and the Poudre Pipeline. Dave Agee noted that they were trying to be conservative in projections but are expecting a 2% growth. Anheuser Busch, in addition to paying for water,pays a supplemental user fee. Fort Collins has significantly invested in capital, which is driving the rate increase. Rates for Wastewater are projected to increase 2%for 2002 and 2003 and 2.5% in 2004. Projected revenue exceeds the debt service requirements and the fund reserve requirements are being met. Ellen reviewed the Wastewater Bond Coverage Chart noting that coverage of 1.15 is required to meet the bond requirement. Dave Agee noted that typically expenses are less than projected and revenue is higher, a conservative approach to budgeting. No study has been done to determine what a private utility would pay for pilots; the 6% is set by Council. Ellen pointed out that the Wastewater Fund Budget would be going down in 2003 from the 2002 budget. Of the $6.7 million for operations, two-thirds is for personal services. The Water Reclamation Plant has reduced staff by two. General Fund transfer pilot equals $720,000 per year and payment for administrative services is $615,000. The transfer to the Customer Service and Admin fund equals $1.8 million per year and the principal and interest payment totals $5.7 million. The Minor Capital is $1.8 million per year and the Capital Projects equals $2.1 million in 2002 and$1.2 million for 2003. Operating revenue is showing a 2% increase for the rates plus projected growth. Total wastewater revenues are estimated at $18 million per year. The Storm Drainage Fund shows a 45%rate adjustment increase in 2002, 10% increase in 2003 and 10% in 2004, 7% in 2005 and 6% in 2006. Council preferred a combination of pay-as-you-go and a $15 million bond issue in 2002 to jump-start capital construction. Ellen reviewed the Rate Comparison graph for the front-range showing Fort Collins at the highest rate. Revenue projections will exceed the debt service requirements. In the storm drainage fund,the bond coverage is 1.25, which is slightly higher than water or wastewater. The Storm Drainage Fund 2002 budget shows$9 million,which does not include the $15 million bond issue planned for 2002. Stormwater Fund does not pay a payment in lieu of taxes. The operations portion of the Storm Drainage Budget, $1.1 million per year is for personal services. No additional employees will be added. The admin transfer to the general fund is $272,000 per year. The Customer Service & Admin transfer is $1.1 million per year and the principal totals $1.7 million and interest$1.9 million per year. The Minor Capital equals $1.2 million per year and the capital project budget for 2002 is $905,000 and $530,000 for 2003. Ellen noted the $15 million bond issue planned for 2002 and that the associated capital projects are not included in this budget, so those appropriations will have to be made FORT COLLINS WATER BOARD MINUTES PAGE 3 MAY 24, 2001 • separately. The 2002 Operating Revenue includes the 45% rate increase that has been projected and the 10%increase for 2003. In review, if adopted by Council, rate increases will be 6%per year for water for 2002 and 2003,2% per year for wastewater, and 45% in 2002 for stormwater and 10% in 2003. The projections are to maintain all bond coverage requirements,to maintain adequate reserve levels and make no significant change in current policy direction. Dave Agee noted that a lot of communities handle stormwater through public works so we do not have their figures to compare. Thomas Brown noted that it would be helpful if information was summarized in cost per capita. Dave Agee agreed trying to include this in future budget presentations. David Lauer would like to see closer comparisons to other municipalities including types of services for their dollars. Motion John Morris made a motion to recommend approving budgets and proposed rate increases as presented. Ted Borstad seconded the motion. Discussion Paul Clopper noted he liked the conservative budgeting approach. Tom would like to see about suggesting an upper limit for principal and interest in the future. Dave Agee agreed that it was a good idea, and he could possibly bring information to the board during off year for discussion. Dave Agee noted that the separate Customer Service and Administrative fund budget has made for more • direct accounting of overhead expenses. Reorganization has helped with staff reduction. Vote Approved unanimously. • ted Water Production Summary - Dennis Bode referred the Board to handout "Treated Water nthly Summary." He noted that in June, 3,874 acre-feet of water was used, which is about 100/c a e the average projections for an average month. July is currently close to the average. Dennis p ' ed out on the graphs in Boards packet that year-to-date, the city is close to 94.5% of average. Committee Reports Water Supply-Tom Brown: Committee in d reviewed the draft of the water supply policy for the City. Committee addressed issue o£ren er, specifically the letter sent to the Mayor from the County Commissioners. The letter proposes the of a point system for deciding priorities among potential entities that wish to rent our surplus er. Committee members seemed to be sympathetic to the goal of preserving agriculture land en spaces in Larimer County. The committee noted five concerns with the suggested point syste 1. The system of points doesn't do much to effectively preserve open space because it i s very few points for conservation easements or other long term decisions to set land aside.