HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 10/22/2013 - LINCOLN CORRIDOR PLAN UPDATEDATE: October 2, 2013
STAFF: Amy Lewin
Pete Wray
Pre-taped staff presentation: available
at fcgov.com/clerk/agendas.php
WORK SESSION ITEM
FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION
Lincoln Corridor Plan Update.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this item is to update Council on the status of the Lincoln Corridor Plan and to invite
feedback and direction for staff on the proposed draft Corridor design alternatives, transit options,
and next steps in the planning process.
The Lincoln Corridor Plan is a 12-month planning project to develop the ultimate multi-modal
roadway design for Lincoln Avenue from Jefferson Street to Lemay Avenue. The planning effort
is focused on developing:
• A community-driven Corridor vision for Lincoln Avenue
• A preferred multi-modal roadway design
• Recommendations for related Corridor projects in the area
• Implementation strategies and actions
• Preliminary project costs
• Project funding options and phasing
The project was initiated in March 2013 and is being led by a team of FC Moves and Planning staff
with support from a multi-departmental Technical Advisory Committee and consultants. Phase 1
of the planning process created a draft Corridor vision through intensive public engagement. Phase
1 is summarized for Council in an August 27, 2013 memo. The project is currently in Phase 2, the
development of alternatives. Three Corridor design alternatives combining these elements have
been developed for input from the public and from City Council.
GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED
1. What feedback or questions does Council have on the proposed draft Corridor design
alternatives?
2. Does Council have any comments or direction on how (or whether) to proceed with the rail
transit option?
3. Does Council have any comments or direction for staff on next steps in the process; would
Council like an additional work session prior to the March 2014 adoption hearing?
October 22, 2013 Page 2
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
The purpose of the Lincoln Corridor Plan is to provide an overall community-supported vision for
the Lincoln Corridor and a clear roadmap for strategies to implement that vision. The Plan not only
provides a preferred street design for Lincoln Avenue (between Jefferson Street and Lemay
Avenue), but will also address a broader context, making recommendations for related projects in
the surrounding area that further advance implementation of existing plans (Attachment 1). The
Plan will be action-oriented and will include implementation strategies, action plan, timeframes, and
potential funding sources.
The 12-month planning process to develop the Plan was initiated in March 2013, and
recommendations from the Plan will be presented to Council for consideration of adoption in March
2014. The Plan is divided into three phases:
Phase 1 - Vision (April - July 2013) (Completed)
Phase 2 - Corridor Design Alternatives (August - October 2013) (In Progress)
Phase 3 - Preferred Alternative/Implementation Planning (November 2013 - February 2014)
The Phase 1 project efforts were documented in a memo provided to Council dated August 27, 2013
(Attachment 2) and included documentation and analysis of existing and future conditions,
summary of the project’s robust community engagement, and development of a Corridor vision.
To review the Phase 1 summary, visit: www.fcgov.com/lincoln.
During the transition from Phase 1 to Phase 2, the project team developed an initial Triple Bottom
Line Analysis Map (TBL) and Synthesis of this early brainstorming effort (Attachment 3). This
TBL analysis has helped guide the development of alternatives, community engagement, and the
development of evaluation criteria. Further updates to the TBL map will be conducted in Phase 3.
Alternatives Development
The project team has developed and shared three draft Corridor design alternatives with the public
based on the Vision defined in Phase 1. The vision statement is as follows:
The new Lincoln will be recognized as a Great Street: an active and vibrant
destination that celebrates our history and is a model for sustainability.
The design elements currently being considered to achieve the vision include:
• Consistent sidewalks, with landscaped parkways
• Either protected or standard bicycle lanes (or combination)
• Off-street multi-use paths (either on the north side or south side of Lincoln)
• Landscaped medians
• On-street parking
• Access control with potential consolidation of driveways
• Streetscape amenities
• New Poudre River bridge, with bicycle and pedestrian facilities
• Improved transit service to the Corridor
October 22, 2013 Page 3
The project team has drafted three design alternatives for the Corridor:
• Alternative 1: Broad Boulevard
• Alternative 2: Modest Median
• Alternative 3: Skinny Street
Because the available right-of-way and adjacent land uses vary, the Corridor was divided into three
segments within each of the alternatives:
• West Segment - Jefferson Street/Riverside Avenue through 1st Street (including the Lincoln
Bridge)
• Central Segment - 1st Street through 3rd Street (fronting the Buckingham neighborhood)
• East Segment - 3rd Street through Lemay Avenue
See Attachment 1 for a map of the segments and Attachment 4 for graphic depictions and details
of the three alternatives
Alternative 1:Broad Boulevard
The Broad Boulevard concept is characterized by a generous 30-foot median with a double row of
trees, located in the middle section of the Corridor. A shared path is located on the north side of the
street for pedestrians and casual bicyclists visiting breweries or businesses.
Alternative 2:Modest Median
The Modest Median concept is characterized by a median that extends most of the Corridor. The
median varies in width, with a maximum width of approximately 16 feet. A shared path is provided
on the south side of the street, creating a convenient connection to the Woodward campus for both
pedestrians and bicyclists.
Alternative 3:Skinny Street
The Skinny Street concept is characterized by a center turn lane and limited median, providing
flexibility in turning movements along the majority of the Corridor. One-way off-street bike lanes
with generous landscape areas are provided on both sides of the street.
Note that these alternatives initially focus on the development and assessment of the roadway design
framework, and did not include detailed streetscape amenities. The Preferred Alternative
Development process (Phase 3) will further incorporate these amenities to enhance the Corridor
(e.g., street furniture, detailed landscaping, etc.). Initial capital cost estimates for the roadway
alternatives are currently being calculated and will be available at the work session. At this point,
it is anticipated that the cost estimates will be similar across all alternatives.
Transit Considerations
The study team assessed various options, including continuing the existing service, enhancing
existing service, adding a Downtown Circulator (consistent with the Transfort Strategic Operating
Plan), adding a Downtown Circulator with a custom vehicle (e.g., rubber-tired trolley or innovative
bus vehicle), and rail trolley. For more details see Attachment 5.
October 22, 2013 Page 4
The three roadway design alternatives described above were developed to support each transit option
except rail-trolley, which was determined to have substantial costs and impacts. Staff welcomes
direction on how (or whether) to proceed with the rail transit option. The details will be further
refined during Phase 3, Preferred Alternative Development.
Driveway Access Considerations
Lincoln Avenue has many individual driveway access points along the Corridor for homeowners
and businesses. Some parcels even include multiple access points. While driveways provide
important access to land uses, they also can be potential conflict points and potentially impact
mobility and capacity.
Given that Lincoln Avenue is not a state highway, a separate Access Control Plan has not been
developed for Lincoln; however, the project team is exploring different levels of access control, with
a primary goal to create a safer traveling environment for bicyclists, pedestrians and motorists, to
further maintain and improve the functional integrity (safety, capacity and speed) of transportation
service along the Corridor, and improve the aesthetics of the Corridor by offering additional
landscaping opportunities.
Alternatives Analysis/Evaluation
The alternatives will be evaluated by a variety of factors, including performance criteria, level of
community support, cost, and triple bottom line considerations. The performance criteria are based
on a set of five objectives. These objectives emerged from the project goals and vision statement.
For each of the objectives, key criteria have been developed that support each objective:
Objective #1 - Improve Multi-Modal Mobility
Objective #2 - Improve Safety
Objective #3 - Create Active Street Environment
Objective #4 - Enhance Appearance
Objective #5 - Incorporate Sustainable Street Design Practices
These five objectives are organized into an alternatives evaluation table (Attachment 6). The
evaluation table includes a "Base Alternative", which includes both the existing condition and the
minor arterial street standards. These provide a baseline by which the alternatives can be compared.
Preferred Alternative
Following a review and comparison of the different evaluation methods, staff anticipates a Preferred
Alternative will emerge. It is likely that the Preferred Alternative will not simply be one single
alternative but rather a combination of alternatives from the different sections of the West, Central
or East segments of the Corridor. If necessary, slight modifications to each section may be required
in order to bring the preferred segments together. Once a Preferred Alternative has been identified,
it will be developed to fully realize the vision for Lincoln as Fort Collins next Great Street, including
gathering areas, pedestrian amenities, low impact development street design practices, etc.
October 22, 2013 Page 5
Community Engagement (Phase 2)
Community engagement during Phase 2 included community workshops, a second Stakeholder
Group meeting, an online survey, and visits with boards and commissions. In general, the Broad
Boulevard alternative and Skinny Street alternative were slightly more supported than the Modest
Median. Other key themes have included:
• Concern over controlled access to the Buckingham Neighborhood
• Protecting the privacy of Buckingham Neighborhood residents
• Providing sufficient access to businesses for employees, delivery trucks and patrons
• Providing an attractive streetscape that incorporates eclectic street character that matches the
unique surroundings
• Concern over safety for pedestrian and bicyclists
• Overwhelming support for a shared path on the north side of the street
• Appreciation for improvements being made to the Lincoln Bridge
• Support for a Downtown Circulator with a custom vehicle.
See Attachment 7 for a summary of community engagement.
Next Steps - Phase 3
The next steps for Phase 3 - Preferred Alternative/Implementation Planning schedule are as follows:
November/December 2013:
• Draft Preferred Alternative (including Preliminary Design)
• Identify strategies for implementation
• Boards and commissions updates
• Identify related Corridor projects in area
• Develop implementation, funding and phasing plan
January/February 2014:
• Draft Lincoln Corridor Plan
• Public review of Plan
• Boards and commissions review and recommendations
March 2014:
• Council Consideration of Adoption of the Plan.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Study Area Map
2. Council Update Memo, August 27, 2013
3. Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Synthesis and Map, October 10, 2013
4. Corridor Design Alternatives Packet
5. Transit Alternatives Summary
October 22, 2013 Page 6
6. Draft Alternatives Evaluation Criteria Table
7. Summary of Alternatives Community Engagement
8. PowerPoint presentation
Lemay
College
Mulberry
Vine
Minor Roads
Major Roads
Streams
Cache la Poudre River ¯
Buckingham
Neighborhood
Woodward
Alta Vista
Neighborhood
Andersonville,
Via Lopez, and San Cristo
Neighborhoods
Vine
West Central East
Lincoln Corridor Study Area
Mulberry
Area of Influence
Lemay
Linden
Buckingham
Jefferson/ Riverside
N
Po
ud
re River
a
n
d
T
r
a
i
l
College
1
This synt
develope
brainstor
recomme
I. Gen
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
II. Con
A
B
C
D
III. Pot
A
thesis reflect
ed by the Lin
rming session
endations on
neral Observ
A. The TBL m
B. Many cons
1. Crossi
2. Crossi
C. City Plan i
Plan.
D. During the
was more t
categories.
including t
and addres
E. Limitation
and a need
traffic flow
businesses
. Much disc
overall out
G. Connectiv
neighborho
H. The enviro
nclusions Off
A. Need to re
1. Projec
selecti
B. This projec
additional
concept.
C. Clarity sho
1. “At th
2. Show
3. Make
4. Provid
busine
D. An info-gr
may be he
B
1. The pr
throug
2. The te
term a
B. Re-visit TB
1. Includ
2. At a m
roject manage
ghout the effo
am will need
and long-term
BL analysis o
de this process
minimum, re-v
ers have excel
rt thus far.
to engage in
impacts of im
on a phased-sc
s in a commu
visit the TBL
lled at engagi
a more direct
mplementing
chedule basis
nication plan
analysis prior
ing the neighb
t dialogue wi
this plan.
s.
n & public eng
r to the select
borhoods and
ith the public
gagement plan
tion of the pre
d businesses
about the sho
n.
eferred altern
2
ort-
native.
Form Completed 6HSWHPEHU 2013 This form is based on research by the City of Olympia and Evergreen State College
Triple Bottom Line Analysis Map
Project or Decision: Lincoln Corridor Plan – Stage in Planning
Process: Visioning to Design Alternatives Evaluated by:
Lincoln Corridor
Project Team and
Social Economic TBL Team Environmental
STRENGTHS:
Implements City Plan components
Is consistent with recent Master Street Plan downsizing of
Lincoln from 4-lane to 2-lane arterial – Supported by
neighborhoods
Reduced floodplain - proximity increases property values
Neighborhood cohesiveness - opportunity to celebrate
historic qualities of existing neighborhoods
Public engagement, increased understanding of
neighborhood values, may lead to rebuilding trust
Increased street activity and connectivity – active
streetscape
Safe environment, walkable community - "eyes on the
street"
Potential street design may include limited driveway
access, which may improve safety
Beautifying gateways - enhanced gateway to downtown
and to Mulberry Corridor and I-25
New design could reduce speed limits and improve overall
safety
May provide a more frequent transit / trolley connection to
Mason Corridor MAX and Old Town
Plan may provide transit loop that will also discourage cut-
through traffic in Buckingham Neighborhood street network
New opportunity for universal design (infrastructure)
Art in public places will enhance cultural & aesthetic value
of adjacent neighborhoods and businesses
Opportunities for people to connect to nature and observe /
learn about natural systems in adjacent Poudre corridor
and pocket areas
STRENGTHS:
Implements City Plan components
Reduced floodplain - proximity increases property values
Affected neighbors may have increased property values
Reduced risk of flooding with improvements
Increased street activity and connectivity
Safe environment, walkable community
Economic opportunity for this area as it redevelops
More attractive street and gateways – enhances economic
potential for downtown and East Mulberry areas
May enhance ridership potential on Mason Corridor MAX
Can tie into Woodward enhancements associated with
proposed development components
New opportunity for universal design (infrastructure)
Art in public places will enhance cultural & aesthetic value of
adjacent neighborhoods and businesses
Potential for enhanced/expanded transit service in area
Improves access to the Brewery district and employment
destinations
STRENGTHS:
Implements City Plan components
Is consistent with recent Master Street Plan downsizing of
Lincoln from 4-lane to 2-lane arterial – Reduced air quality
Form Completed 6HSWHPEHU 2013 This form is based on research by the City of Olympia and Evergreen State College
Triple Bottom Line Analysis Map
Project or Decision: Lincoln Corridor Plan – Stage in Planning
Process: Visioning to Design Alternatives Evaluated by:
Lincoln Corridor
Project Team and
LIMITATIONS: TBL Team
Potential impacts to Buckingham neighborhood, depending
on which design alternative is chosen
Increased activity within the neighborhood may lead to
perceived lack of safety, e.g., from increased transient
traffic
Lack of access to businesses and homes because of street
improvements
Money spent in the corridor could have been spent in the
neighborhoods
Traffic concerns/impacts on Buckingham Neighborhood
during construction
New design could reduce speed limits and frustrate drivers
used to higher speeds in corridor
Reduced speeds could increase traffic pressures on
Buckingham neighborhood
LIMITATIONS
Potential impacts to Buckingham neighborhood, depending on
which design alternative is chosen
Floodplain - could increase cost of compliance,
Impacts to businesses in the area and close to Old Town due
to construction
Property taxes could increase
Lack of access to businesses and homes because of street
improvements
Could detract from other commercial areas in the community
by focusing on this area
Green street features – may increase project costs
Investment made here might take away from another area -
priority of public dollars
Operations and Maintenance for streets and parks department,
may increase level of effort and cost
Narrow right-of-way in some portions of corridor may limit what
could be included in final design
LIMITATIONS:
Construction will generate dust, carbon emissions, and will
consume substantive fossil fuel resources
Increased activity due to construction can discourage wildlife
travel and establishment in the area
OPPORTUNITIES:
Recent public engagement has created a strong dialogue
with the neighborhood and public – new best practice
Will be the first “New Great Street” project – if successful,
may create similar street opportunities across FC
Neighborhood cohesiveness - opportunity to improve
neighborhood collaboration
Increase aesthetics, more beautiful street
Improved health benefits created by encouraging more
cycling and walking
Can offer new destination opportunities, i.e. brewery
district, cultural/historical district, landmark building
showcases
Could develop new partnerships and collaborations with
breweries and future breweries
Form Completed 6HSWHPEHU 2013 This form is based on research by the City of Olympia and Evergreen State College
Triple Bottom Line Analysis Map
Project or Decision: Lincoln Corridor Plan – Stage in Planning
Process: Visioning to Design Alternatives Evaluated by:
Lincoln Corridor
Project Team and
TBL Team
As corridor plan is implemented, increased opportunities to
improve flood protection and overall community resilience
THREATS:
Increased traffic volumes impacting existing neighborhoods
If outreach efforts do not succeed, could lose neighborhood
engagement and trust
Potential gentrification of neighborhoods by new
development/redevelopment
Vine and Lemay intersection creates a transportation
bottleneck near the new corridor – interim transportation
solutions may be necessary
Creating “gateway” to downtown may increase use,
changing integrity and feel of residential neighborhood
THREATS:
Floodplain - property damage, high potential
If vision does not drive funding opportunities, then what?
Vine and Lemay intersection creates a transportation
bottleneck near the new corridor – interim transportation
solutions may be necessary along Lemay Ave
THREATS:
Increased activity due to construction can discourage wildlife
travel and establishment in the area
Future flooding in area
NOTES:
LINCOLN CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES DESCRIPTION
Alternative 1
Broad Boulevard
Alternative 2
Modest Median
Alternative 3
Skinny Street
Fort Collins Typical
2-Lane Arterial Street
The Broad Boulevard concept is
characterized by a generous 30’-
0” median with a double row
of trees, located in the middle
section of the corridor. A shared
path is located on the north side
of the street for pedestrians
and casual bicyclists visiting
breweries or businesses. Key
characteristics of this alternative
include:
The Modest Median concept is
characterized by a median that
extends most of the corridor.
The median varies in width,
with a maximum width of
approximately 16’-0”. A shared
path is provided on the south
side of the street, creating a
convenient connection to the
Woodward campus for both
pedestrians and bicyclists.
Key characteristics of this
alternative include:
The Skinny Street concept
is characterized by a center
turn lane and limited median,
providing flexibility in turning
movements along the majority
of the corridor. One-way off-
street bike lanes with generous
landscape areas are provided
on both sides of the street. Key
characteristics of this alternative
include:
The Typical 2-Lane Arterial
is characterized by two
12-foot wide lanes and an
optional 12-foot wide center
median. The median can be
either landscaped or paved.
Entire roadway width totals
52 feet with an 84-foot
minimum right of way.
Pedestrian
Shared path on north side of
Lincoln, detached walk on south
side of Lincoln
Shared path on the south side
of Lincoln, detached walk on
north side of Lincoln
Lincoln Corridor West September 19, 2013
Willow Street
Jefferson Street Riverside Avenue
Poudre Trail
Ranch-Way
Feeds
Ranch-Way
Feeds
Natural
Resources
Consulting
Engineers
Attached walk with
on street bike lane;
no additional ROW
necessary
Controlled
access at Ranch-
Way Feeds
Access
Historic Tree
Ranch-
Way Feeds
Parking
Ranch-Way
Feeds Parking
Udall
Natural Area
Lincoln Bridge
Smokestack
Pottery
Western
Convenience
Diamond Vogel
Paint and
Decorating
Center
Nice Car
Inc.
Buckingham
Park
Maintenance
Access to Natural
Area
Enhancements
to Willow Street
Part of Future
Project
EXISTING
BUS STOP
EXISTING
BUS STOP
EXISTING
BUS STOP
Poudre Trail
12’ SHARED PATH
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
ue
Willow Street
Jefferson Street Riverside Aven
Detached walk
may require
additional ROW
Access
Provided
from
Jefferson
Street
Access
Provided
from Willow
Street
Lincoln Bridge
Historic
Tree
Poudre Trail
Ranch-Way
Feeds
Ranch-Way
Feeds
Natural
Resources
Consulting
Engineers
Smokestack
Pottery
Western
Convenience
Nice
Car
Inc.
Buckingham
Park
Udall
Natural Area
Bus pull out may
require additional
ROW
Limited
Access from
Willow to
Ranch-Way
Feeds
Willow Street
Includes Left
Turn Lane
Maintenance
Access to Natural
Area
Enhancements
to Willow Street
Part of Future
Project
Ranch-
Way Feeds
Ranch-Way Parking
Feeds Parking
N 0’ 30’ 60’ 120’
Willow Street
Jefferson Street Riverside Avenue
enue
Detached walk
may require
additional ROW
Access
Provided
from
Riverside
Lincoln Bridge
Historic
Tree
Poudre Trail
Ranch-Way
Feeds
Ranch-Way
Feeds
Natural
Resources
Consulting
Engineers
Smokestack
Pottery
Western
Convenience Nice
Car
Inc.
Buckingham
Park
Udall
Natural Area
Udall
Natural Area
Bus pull out may
require additional
ROW
Willow Street
Includes Left
Turn Lane Limited
Access from
Willow to
Ranch-Way
Feeds
Maintenance
Access to Natural
Area
Enhancements
to Willow Street
Part of Future
Project
Ranch-
Way
Feeds
Parking
Ranch-Way
Feeds Parking
Diamond Vogel
Paint and
Lincoln Corridor Central September 19, 2013
Broad Boulevard Concept Looking East
1st Street
2nd Street
3rd Street
Buckingham Neighborhood
Team
Petroleum
Team
Petroleum
In-Situ
Rocky
Mountain
Hydroponic
Hydro
Construction
EXISTING BUS
STOP
BIKE
BIKE
WALK
DRIVE
DRIVE
Average Distance
From Residences
to Edge of
Pavement: 25’-0”
Potential Improved
Alley Access to
Residences
12’ SHARED PATH
?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Alternative 1:
Broad Boulevard
CENTRAL
Pedestrian
• Shared Path on North
Side
• Detached Walk on
South Side
Bicycle • On-Street Bike Lanes
Shared Path • Shared Path on North
Side
Access
• Potential Closed
Access at Residential
Driveways to Prevent
Conflicts Between
Residents, Bicyclists
and Pedestrians.
• Improved Alley Access
to Residences
• Potential Limited
Access at In-Situ
On-Street
Parking
• On-Street Parallel
Parking in Front
of Buckingham
Modest Median Concept Looking East
1st Street
2nd Street
3rd Street
Buckingham Neighborhood
Team
Petroleum
Team
Petroleum
In-Situ
Rocky
Mountain
Hydroponic
Hydro
Construction
EXISTING BUS
STOP
MULTI-USE PATH
BIKE
BIKE
MEDIAN
DRIVE
DRIVE
WALK
AVERAGE DISTANCE
FROM HOMES
TO EDGE OF
PAVEMENT: 25’-0”
?
?
Alternative 2:
Modest Median
CENTRAL
Pedestrian
• Detached Walk
on North Side
• Shared Path on
South Side
Bicycle
• On-Street Bike
Lanes on Both
Sides
• Shared Path on
South Side
Shared Path • Shared Path on
South Side
Access • Potential
Limited Access
at In-Situ
On-Street
Parking
• No On-Street
Parking
Landscape
• Trees and
Plantings at
Street Edge
P
October 10, 2013 6
Skinny Street Concept Looking East
N 0’ 30’ 60’ 120’
1st Street
2nd Street
3rd Street
Buckingham Neighborhood
Team
Petroleum
Team
Petroleum
In-Situ
Rocky
Mountain
Hydroponic
Hydro
Construction
BIKE
BIKE
WALK
DRIVE
DRIVE
WALK
AVERAGE DISTANCE
FROM HOMES
TO EDGE OF
PAVEMENT: 40’-0”
EXISTING BUS
STOP
?
Alternative 3:
Skinny Street
CENTRAL
Pedestrian
• Attached Walk
on North Side
• Detached Walk
on South Side
Bicycle
• On-Street Bike
Lane on North
Side
• Off-Street Bike
Lane on South
Side
Shared Path
• None
Access • Potential
Limited Access
at In-Situ
On-Street
Parking
• Residential
Parking in
Driveways
within ROW
Landscape
• Trees and
Plantings at
Street Edges
?
Lincoln Corridor East September 19, 2013
Broad Boulevard Concept Looking East
Lemay Avenue
Bank of
Colorado
Stor-Mor Self Storage
ACE Auto Fort Collins Brewery
Collision
Experts
Rocky
Mountain
Cultured
Marble
Fort Collins
Monument
Odell Brewing
Company
Woodward Campus
The
Backporch
Cafe
Lambspun
DRIVE
DRIVE
12’ SHARED PATH
PROPOSED BUS
STOP
PROPOSED BUS
STOP
EXISTING
BUS STOP
EXISTING
BUS STOP
POTENTIAL PEDESTRIAN
CONNECTION FOR BREWERY
TOURS
12’ SHARED PATH
DRIVE
DRIVE
BIKE
BIKE
WALK
BIKE
BIKE
BIOSWALE
BIOSWALE
FUTURE ANGLED
PARKING
BIOSWALE
BIOSWALE
POTENTIAL LEFT
TURN LANE ON
LEMAY TO BACK
PORCH CAFE
Alternative 1:Broad Boulevard EAST
Pedestrian • Shared Path on North Side of Lincoln
• Detached Walk on South Side of Lincoln
Bicycle
• On-Street Bike Lanes
Shared Path
Modest Median Concept Looking East
Lemay Avenue
Stor-Mor Self Storage
Fort Collins Brewery Bank of
Colorado
ACE Auto
Collision
Experts
Rocky
Mountain
Cultured
Marble
Fort Collins
Monument
Odell Brewing
Company
Woodward Campus
The
Backporch
Cafe
Lambspun
PROPOSED BUS
STOP
PROPOSED BUS
STOP
EXISTING
BUS STOP
EXISTING
BUS STOP
POTENTIAL PEDESTRIAN
CONNECTION FOR BREWERY
TOURS
DRIVE
DRIVE
MEDIAN
MEDIAN
BIKE LANE
BIKE
WALK
WALK
DRIVE
BIKE LANE DRIVE
BIKE
FUTURE PARKING
MULTI-USE PATH
MULTI-USE PATH
BIOSWALE
BIOSWALE
BIOSWALE
POTENTIAL LEFT
TURN LANE ON
LEMAY TO BACK
PORCH CAFE
? ? ?
?
Alternative 2: Modest Median EAST
Pedestrian
• Detached Walk on North Side
Bicycle • Off Street Bike Lanes on Both Sides
Shared Path
Skinny Street Concept Looking East
Proposed
Bus Stop
Proposed
Bus Stop
N 0’ 30’ 60’ 120’
Lemay Avenue
Fort Collins Brewery Bank of
Colorado
ACE Auto
Collision
Experts
Rocky
Mountain
Cultured
Marble
Fort Collins
Monument
Odell Brewing
Company
Woodward Campus
The
Backporch
Cafe
Stor-Mor Self Storage
Lambspun
DRIVE
DRIVE
MEDIAN
MEDIAN
BIKE
BIKE
ENHANCED
CROSSING
WALK
WALK
WALK
DRIVE
DRIVE
FUTURE PARKING
BIKE
BIKE
WALK
BIOSWALE
BIOSWALE
BIOSWALE
BIOSWALE
POTENTIAL PEDESTRIAN
CONNECTION FOR BREWERY
TOURS
POTENTIAL LEFT
TURN LANE ON
LEMAY TO BACK
PORCH CAFE
Alternative 3: Skinny Street EAST
Pedestrian
• Detached Walks on Both Sides
Bicycle
• Off Street Bike Lanes on Both Sides
Shared Path
Alternative 1 - Broad Boulevard
Pedestrian
Overlook with
Benches and
Flower Pots
Pedestrian
Lights
New Trail
Connection
Shared Path
Drive Lane
Mixing
Zone
Mixing
Zone
Walk
Walk
Walk
Walk Walk
Walk
Plaza
Drive Lane
On Street Bike Lane
Poudre Trail
On Street Bike Lane
On Street Bike Lane
On Street Bike Lane
On Street Bike Lane
On Street Bike Lane
October 10, 2013 11
Alternative 2 - Modest Median
Pedestrian
Overlook with
Tables, Chairs and
Flower Pots
Pedestrian
Lights
New Trail
Connection
Walk
Median
Drive Lane
Mixing
Zone
Mixing
Zone
Walk Walk
Walk
Walk
Walk
Shared Path
Plaza
Drive Lane
On Street Bike Lane
On Street Bike Lane
Poudre Trail
On Street Bike Lane
On Street Bike Lane
On Street Bike Lane
On Street Bike Lane
October 10, 2013 12
Alternative 3 - Skinny Street
Planters
Street Edge
Monuments
Benches
New Trail
Connection
Walk
Drive Lane
Mixing
Zone
Mixing
Zone
Walk Walk
Walk
Walk
Overlook
Walk
Off Street Bike Lane
Off Street Bike Lane
Overlook
Drive Lane
Off Street Bike Lane
Poudre Trail
Off Street Bike Lane
On Street Bike Lane
On Street Bike Lane
October 10, 2013 13
Streetscape Amenities September 19, 2013
organic rugged
modern
Bench
Bike Rack
Trash Receptacle
Wall/Fence
Signage/Monument
Lighting
Bench
Bike Rack
Trash Receptacle
Wall/Fence
Signage/Monument
Lighting
Bench
Bike Rack
Trash Receptacle
Wall/Fence
Signage/Monument
Lighting
Streetscape Amenities will populate the Lincoln Corridor, providing comfortable and engaging gathering areas. These amenities will also reinforce the unique brand/
identity of the district. Three different styles have been prepared to demonstrate different approaches to the character of the streetscape amenities. The styles are very
conceptual in nature, and meant to suggest an approach to the design of the streetscape amenities, rather than illustrate the specifi c furnishings that will be selected
for the street. Regardless of which style is selected, the streetscape amenities will:
The modern style is characterized by bold forms
and contemporary fi nishes
The organic style is characterized by sinuous or
irregular forms and natural fi nishes
The rugged style is characterized by simple,
basic forms and coarser, earthen fi nishes
Connect with Downtown
Although the Lincoln Corridor is not part of downtown, it is a primary connector to it. The design of the street will be complementary with downtown.
Enhance the Eclectic Character of the Corridor
The Lincoln Corridor includes a diversity of uses including industrial, commercial, and residential. This blend of uses is what makes Lincoln special.
The design of the street will support and enhance this eclectic character.
Create a Fresh Identity
Streetscape amenities will help create a fresh face for the district, while respecting and celebrating the rich history of the area.
October 10, 2013 14
September 19, 2013
walk
Sidewalk
Buffered Bike Lane
Buffered Bike Lane
Proposed Trail Access Ramp
Existing Trail
Mixing
Zone
Mixing
Zone
Access Ramp
CROSSWALK
Broad Boulevard
Colored Conflict Zone Marking
Colored Intersection Marking in
Seattle, WA
Colored Concrete Crossing in
Glenwood Springs, CO
Combination Bicycle/Pedstrian Road
Crossing in Indianapolis, IN
Colored Bicycle Crossing in
Madison,WI
Shared Path and Buffered Bicycle Lane Crossings Poudre River Trail Connection and Bridge Crossing Intersection Treatments
Bicycle Crossing Leading to Bicycle
Box in Vancouver, BC
Two-Stage Tun Box in Chicago, IL
Enhanced Shared Path Crossing Bicycle Crossing Marking Bicycle Queue Box
Bikes Use Crosswalk Sign
Bicycle Intersection Crossing
Bicycle Access Ramp Marking
Shared Path
Odell’s
Poudre River
Willow Street
Lemay Avenue
3rd Street
Shared Path
Bicycle Lane
Bicycle Lane
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Colored Conflict Zone Marking Bicycle/Pedestrian Road Crossing
NTS NTS
NTS
CROSSWALK
Lincoln Corridor Bike Alternatives
October 10, 2013 15
Modest Median
Shared Path Crossing Bus Conflict Zone Intersection Treatments
Shared Path Crossing in Bozeman, MT
Green Dashed Conflict Zone Marking
in Denver, CO
Green Dashed Conflict Zone Marking
in San Francisco, CA
Enhanced Shared Path Crossing
Green Dashed Conflict Zone Marking
Green Dashed Conflict Zone Marking Bicycle Intersection
Crossing Marking
1st Street
Shared Path
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Riverside Avenue
NTS
NTS
NTS
October 10, 2013 16
Skinny Street
Colored Bicycle Crossing in Madison
Driveway and Intersection Treatments Poudre River Trail Connection and Bridge Crossing Intersection Treatments
Colored Intersection Crossing in
Chicago, IL
Colored Conflict Zone Marking in
Chicago, IL
Colored Conflict Zone Marking in
Portland, OR
Bicycle Intersection Markings in
Brooklyn, NY
Colored Protected Bicycle Lane
Crossing in Madison
Colored Conflict Zone Marking Buffer
Protected Bicycle Lane
Protected Bicycle Lane
3rd Street
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Willow Street
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Riverview Avenue
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Colored Conflict Zone Marking Buffered Bicycle Lane Colored Conflict Zone Marking Enhanced Bicycle Intersection
Markings
NTS
NTS NTS
October 10, 2013 17
*Does no
DRAFT 10
Prelimina
#
1
M
‐
‐
‐
2
En
‐
‐
3
Do
St
‐
4
Do
Ru
‐
5
Li
‐
ot include co
0/16/13
ary Transit O
Maintain Exist
Route 5 – 6
Route 14 –
30 minute
connecting
nhance Exist
Increase fre
routes that
15 minute
connecting
owntown Ci
tandard Bus
Shuttle – 1
connecting
owntown Ci
ubber‐Tired
Shuttle – 1
connecting
ncoln Avenu
One‐mile r
Lemay) – 1
ost of potent
Options – th
Description
ting Service
60 min. frequ
– 60 min. freq
(combined) s
g to MAX
ting Service
equencies on
t currently se
(combined) s
Page 2 of 2
DRAFT 10/16/13
Potential Transit Routing – based on Transfort Strategic Operating Plan
DRAFT
Objective #1 Improve Multi-Modal Mobility Objective #2 Improve Safety
Alternative Accomodates
Traffic Flow
Pedestrian
Comfort and
Convenience
Commuter
Bicyclist
Comfort and
Convenience
Leisure
Bicyclist
Comfort and
Convenience
Motorist
Access and
Convenience
Commercial
Truck
Access and
Convenience
Transit
Access and
Convenience
Provides
Safe
Crossings at
Intersections
and
Entrance
Drives
Provides
a Buffer
Between
Vehicular
Traffic and
Bicyclists
Reduces
Driveway
Access
Conflict
Points
Existing Condition
(Includes Woodward Interim Improvements)
Minor Arterial Standard
Broad Boulevard East
Broad Boulevard Central
Broad Boulevard West
Modest Median East
Modest Median Central
Modest Median West
Skinny Street East
Skinny Street Central
Skinny Street West
Bridge Option 1 - Broad Boulevard
Bridge Option 2 - Modest Median
Bridge Option 3 - Skinny Street
Alternative 1
Broad Boulevard
DRAFT
Objective #3 Create Active Street Environment Objective #4 Enhance
Appearance
Objective #5: Incorporate Sustainable Street
Design Practices
Community Cost
Promotes
Traffic
Calming
Provides
Convenient
On Street
Parking
Anticipates
Future
Redevelopment
Potential for
Pedestrian
Gathering
Areas
Provides
Adequate
Landscape
Enhancements
Potential for
Streetscape
Amenity
Enhancements
Transit
Oriented
Potential for
Bioswales &
Stormwater
Infiltration
Potential
for Pervious
Pavement
Community
Support
Capital
Cost
Lifecycle
Costs
October 10, 2013 2
Lincoln Corridor Plan – "Selecting a Future for the Lincoln Corridor"
Alternatives Community Outreach Summary
A Community Workshop, a Stakeholder Workshop, and an Online Survey were key parts of the
community outreach conducted during the alternatives review phase of the project. A summary
of each of these outreach events follows:
Community Workshop - September 19, 2013
The Community Workshop provided the community an opportunity to review and evaluate
three alternatives for Lincoln Corridor. Two workshop sessions were held on September 19 to
review and discuss the alternatives.
Each meeting began with an introduction to
the project, an overview of community
outreach activities and results to-date,
existing conditions, and an overview of the
alternatives and key components.
Participants were asked to break into two groups to discuss and evaluate the pros and cons of
each alternative. Following this discussion, each group reported key discussion points and
findings to the larger group. At the conclusion of the workshop, participants were asked to
complete an evaluation form and rate the alternatives. Evaluation criteria included multi-modal
mobility, safety, access to businesses and residences, and landscape enhancements.
Overarching themes of the workshop included: concern over access to the Buckingham
Neighborhood, maintaining a sense of privacy for neighborhood residents, safety for all modes
of travel, providing separated bike lanes in all alternatives, and incorporating a multi-use trail
on the north side of the street in the Skinny Street Alternative.
Participants rated the Skinny Street alternative the highest in the performance evaluation, but
indicated an overall preference for the Broad Boulevard Alternative for all three segments of
the corridor. The Rugged style of Streetscape Amenities was heavily favored over Organic and
Modern. Participants voiced appreciation for bridge design alternatives that incorporated
overlooks and seating areas where pedestrians could appreciate the view of the Poudre River.
Stakeholder Workshop - September 25, 2013
The purpose of the Stakeholder Workshop was to provide stakeholders an opportunity to
review and evaluate three alternatives for Lincoln Corridor. The stakeholder group is comprised
of residents from Alta Vista, Andersonville and Buckingham neighborhoods, Lincoln Corridor
business owners or representatives, and other community leaders.
Date Session Participants
September 19
4:00-5:30 p.m. 24
6:00-7:30 p.m. 15
ATTACHMENT 7
Page 2 of 10
The workshop began with an introduction to the project, an overview of community outreach
activities and results to-date, existing conditions, and an overview of the alternatives and key
components.
Participants were asked to break into two groups to discuss and evaluate the pros and cons of
each alternative. Following this discussion, each group reported key discussion points and
findings to the larger group. At the conclusion of the workshop, participants were asked to
complete an evaluation form and rate the alternatives. Evaluation criteria included multi-modal
mobility, safety, access to businesses and residences, and landscape enhancements.
Key themes resulting from this workshop include: protecting the privacy of Buckingham
Neighborhood residents; providing sufficient access to businesses for employees, delivery
trucks and patrons; providing sufficient room for on-street truck turning radii movements; and
providing an eclectic street character that matches the unique surroundings. Shared or closed
accesses to businesses were not recommended.
Participants rated the Skinny Street alternative the highest in the performance evaluation,
primarily because the alternative provides the best access for delivery trucks. In terms of
preference, participants chose the Broad Boulevard concept for the West segment, and the
Skinny Street alternative for the Central and East segments.
Online Survey - September 20 thru October 4, 2013
An online survey was prepared to gather feedback from the larger community on the
alternatives. The survey was similar in format to the evaluation forms provided at the
Community and Stakeholder workshops. The survey was available from September20-October
4, 2013
Over 200 people responded to the online survey. Key themes that emerged include: a concern
over safety for pedestrian and bicyclists, an overwhelming preference for a shared path on the
north side of the street, and an appreciation for improvements being made to the Lincoln
Bridge.
Survey results indicated an overall preference for the Broad Boulevard alternative; nearly 50%
of respondents selected this alternative for all three segments. Skinny Street came in second
with 30%, followed by Modest Median with 20%. Respondents favored a downtown circulator
route as a transit option. Nearly 50% of respondents preferred a custom bus, with 20%
selecting a standard bus. The Rugged Streetscape Amenities style was favored by over 50% of
respondents, with the Organic style favored by 40% of respondents.
Page 3 of 10
Results
Findings from the three community outreach events are summarized below:
1. Rate the strength of each alternative:
Attendees were asked to rate each alternative from 5 to 1 (5 representing the strongest; 1 the
weakest) using the following criteria:
• Mobility
o Pedestrian
o Commuter Cyclist
o Leisure Cyclist
o Personal Vehicles
o Delivery Trucks
• Safety
• Enhances Existing Neighborhoods
• Visual Appeal
• Access (for neighborhood and businesses)
The results varied, but overall the Broad Boulevard alternative ranked highest, followed by the
Skinny Street alternative.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Alt. 1: Broad Boulevard
Alt. 2: Modest Median
Alt. 3: Skinny Street
Page 4 of 10
2. What is your preferred alternative for each segment (measured by percent of respondents)?
The corridor is divided into three distinct segments: West, Central and East. Respondents were
asked to indicate their preferred alternative for each segment. Broad Boulevard ranked highest
followed by Skinny Street.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
West: Riverside
Ave./Jefferson St. to
1st St. (including
Lincoln Bridge)
Central: 1st Street to
3rd Street
East: 3rd Street to
Lemay Avenue
Alt. 1: Broad Boulevard
Alt. 2: Modest Median
Alt. 3: Skinny Street
Page 5 of 10
3. Which public transit option do you prefer?
Participants were asked to select their preference for transit options. A downtown circulator
service using a custom vehicle was preferred.
4. Which streetscape amenities concept do you prefer?
Participants were asked to select a preferred style for streetscape amenities along Lincoln. The
Rugged style was preferred.
Downtown
Circulator
Service Using
Custom Vehicle
46%
Downtown
Circulator
Service Using
Standard Bus
22%
Enhance Existing
Service
16%
Other
8%
Maintain Existing
Service
8%
Rugged
Organic 53%
35%
Modern
8%
Other
4%
Page 6 of 10
What We Heard – Key Themes
The following list of key themes summarizes the ideas and comments shared by participants in
the three community outreach events.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility
• Consider elevating off-street bike lanes to increase pedestrian and bicycle separation
• Shared path should be 12'-0" minimum in width
• Shared path on north side is a preferred alternative
• Provide off-street bike lanes for all alternatives for safety and mobility purposes
• On street bike lanes require buffer at the door zone adjacent to on street parking for
safety
• Consider a "brewery to brewery" bike trail along irrigation canal
• Consider adding a shared path on either or both sides of the street on the Skinny Street
East alternative
• Broad Boulevard Central: presents too many pedestrian conflicts
• Do not see a need for pedestrians on south side of Lincoln because the nature of the
businesses are not intended for walk-ins
• Consider adding a shared path running north/south along Lemay that connects to
Lincoln
• Address cyclist safety while crossing railroad tracks heading northwest on Willow
(especially at Ranchway Feeds)
• Address safety concerns for cyclists heading west on Lincoln/ Mountain and turning left
onto Peterson; the intersection is too close to the Riverside/ Lincoln intersection where
safety becomes a key issue
• Would like to see safe pedestrian crossings at intervals along Lincoln
• Would like a non-vehicle pedestrian/ bike mall on certain days of the week which would
be a great pilot project
• How will bicyclists traveling on the south in Skinny Street get to businesses on the north
side? Consider providing north/ south connections for bicyclists
• Modest Median: provides the safest option for bicyclists traveling from Old Town to the
breweries
• Broad Boulevard: consider moving bike lane adjacent to sidewalk
• Modest Median: do not like the diagonal parking with a bike lane behind because it
poses safety issues
• Modest Median: provide pedestrian refuges on medians
• Consider shaving off a couple of parking spaces in the center on Mountain near the
Peterson intersection to improve safety for cyclists turning left onto Peterson from
Mountain
• Broad Boulevard: on-street parking and bus pullout lanes could conflict with bicyclists
and present safety issues
• Could mixing zones at the Poudre Bridge create conflicts between bicyclists moving in
various directions?
Page 7 of 10
• Consider how bike lanes transition to the road at the intersection of Lemay/ Lincoln
from a safety standpoint
• Broad Boulevard: the commuter bike lane in the concept should be separated and not
situated between lanes designated for vehicular traffic and parking
Safety
• Provide flashing crossings similar to Mountain Avenue near Coopersmiths Brewery at
major pedestrian and bicycle crossings
• Residential driveways fronting Lincoln are problematic because they pose multiple
conflicts in terms of access and safety; primarily, they conflict with bicyclists and traffic
when residents are backing out of driveways
• Should not have on street parking along west end because the area is too busy with
railroad
• Skinny Street Central presents a lot of conflicts between pedestrians, bicyclists and
motorists
• Modest Median provides the best alternative for traffic calming, and matches the
downtown aesthetic best
• The Skinny Street option gives priority to cars and parking resulting in less safety for the
pedestrian and cyclist
• Modest Median might increase traffic speeds which would necessitate the construction
of flashing pedestrian crossings
• Skinny Street provides the safest option because all modes of transportation are
separated
Landscape
• Given the high truck volume on the corridor, median trees will likely get clipped similar
to those on Taft Hill, between Drake and Horsetooth; consider tree placement on tree
lawns only instead
• Maintain visibility of neighborhoods by not planting too many trees in front of homes
• Provide more landscape buffering on the north side to increase privacy for Buckingham
neighborhood residents
• Appreciate the bioswale on Skinny Street
• Less green space on the south side of Lincoln in the Modest Median would be preferable
because it seems like wasted space
• The medians provided on Broad Boulevard and Modest Median are appreciated over
the lack of medians presented on Skinny Street
• Consider reducing the landscape on the south side in the Broad Boulevard concept
Parking
• The Skinny Street Central alternative should provide signage that deters motorists from
blocking residential driveways when parking on street
• Not enough on-street parking in the Broad Boulevard East to make the parking
worthwhile
Page 8 of 10
• Clarify whether parallel parking in the Broad Boulevard Central option in front of
Buckingham neighborhood is for residents only; consider permit parking for residents
• Consider a back-in diagonal parking option adjacent to bike lanes to improve safety
• Modest Median East: angled parking does not work well in this context; it works well in
Old Town with lot-line-to-lot-line development exists. There might be a better use for
this space that can be enhanced for public use
• I prefer the Broad Boulevard concept because I approve of parking in the center of the
street as it adds ease of access to businesses on both sides of the street
• Broad Boulevard is a terrible option because it poses several safety issues: pedestrians
and cars are sharing the road, and bike paths are squeezed between two traffic lanes
• Having cars cross over bike lanes in order to access parking in Broad Boulevard is
concerning
• Modest Median East: on street parking in front of Odell Brewing Company will not work
because of the fire and truck lane
• Median parking is undesirable
• Skinny Street East: presents conflicts with parallel parking and off-street bike lane.
Parked cars cannot easily access adjacent sidewalks
• Parking on north side of street in front of breweries works well because it provides safe
crossings for people walking from parking to breweries
• Skinny Street: the flexibility to phase parking is a great idea
• Parallel parking in front of Buckingham would provide those visiting homeowners a
place to park
• North side of street is naturalized with bioswale which could make on-street parking
undesirable
• Skinny Street: do not like the phased parking approach. Once trees and landscaping
become established they will have to be ripped out for parking
Transit
• Consider extending the Downtown Circulator Bus east to Alta Vista and Andersonville
neighborhoods.
• Bus stop pull-offs are appreciated as they improve safety and traffic flow
• Consider extending the trolley tracks east onto Lincoln
• Downtown Circulator Bus should not take away from other transit/ City priorities
Lincoln Bridge
• Rugged Bridge looks best as it relates well to the industrial and eclectic character of the
corridor
• Plaza on the bridge may not get used because the area will get inundated with exhaust
fumes
• Consider spatially accommodating a food/ beverage cart in the plaza area
• First bridge over the Cache la Poudre River was the Lincoln Bridge so the character
should integrate the agricultural history of the area
• Is full bridge replacement on the City's Capital Improvement Plan?
Page 9 of 10
• Washington Street Bridge in Golden is actually three bridges (old highway bridge with
two pedestrian bridges on either side of the highway)
• The overlook on the south side of the bridge is preferred because it provides an
excellent view to the Udall Natural Area
• Appreciate the seating options in all bridge alternatives because it provides a place to sit
and enjoy the river
• Consider a bridge option with a second bridge specifically designated for bike traffic
• Prefer bridge with overlooks on both sides
Streetscape Amenities
• A fusion of organic and rugged would best suit the character for Lincoln
• Integrate the aesthetic of existing breweries into the streetscape
• The rugged character option is the most timeless
• Materials of the organic style should be unique and crafted, not necessarily squiggly
• The Colorado and Fort Collins atmosphere fits perfectly with a rugged, outdoor lifestyle
• Rugged fits best with the neighborhood since it is more than a century old and still
preserves natural open space
• The style of the Woodward building will be more contemporary therefore the
streetscape character will have to work with the variety of architecture found along
Lincoln
• Consider a less uniform style that reflects the eclectic and unique nature of the corridor
• A combination of rugged and historic would be appropriate for the corridor so it speaks
to Colorado but more specifically to the Lincoln corridor
Overall
• Extend the study area west to Meldrum and Howes and match the character of
Mountain Avenue to Lincoln up until the Lincoln Bridge
• Respect cost increases and adverse affects to residents resulting from improvements
• Consider extending the streetscape character eastward, across Lemay
• Excited about the potential for alley access at Buckingham Neighborhood
• Don't eliminate driveway access for Buckingham Residents
• Include the proposed Lemay reroute on future alternative scenarios
• Clarify responsibility for snow removal in front of Buckingham neighborhood residences
if Broad Boulevard Central is adopted
• Modest Median Central allows access for residents but maintains the character of
Mountain Avenue
• New alternative idea: Eliminate driveway access to Skinny Street Central and put a
westbound bike lane within the tree median and sidewalk north of the bike lane
• Consider dropping the speed limit to 25mph for safety purposes
• West and east options should provide better balance between transportation and
access while central options should limit access more
• Although the medians are appreciated in the Modest Median concept as a continuation
of Mountain Avenue, the space is better utilized for the neighborhood in Skinny Street
Page 10 of 10
• When discussing alley improvements, it would be helpful to show the downtown alley
improvements to demonstrate potential alternatives
• Focus on creating small experiential moments along the corridor rather than spreading
thin a giant gesture
• Businesses need access; neighborhoods need quiet. Both of these factors need to be
considered
• Cost implications for all three alternatives should be part of the evaluation criteria so
informed decisions could be made
• Maintain a buffer between the Buckingham neighborhood and road/ sidewalk
• The ability for semi-trucks to safely turn and access businesses should be taken into
consideration
• Is there a way to improve alley access and keep driveways open in front of Buckingham
neighborhood?
• The combined access at Team Petroleum and In-Situ does not provide great access for
semi traffic
• Broad Boulevard East provides the best option for multi-modal mobility with a shared
path on the north side
• Concern about the inability for trucks to turn around at the intersection of Willow and
Lincoln (particularly in the Broad Boulevard and Modest Median concepts), which would
encourage truck traffic to turn into the Buckingham neighborhood
• An in and out access will be needed at Ranchway Feeds otherwise the parking lot south
of Lincoln will need to act as a holding spot for trucks
• Skinny Street provides the best alternative for Buckingham neighborhood residents
because it will be quieter
• All residents in the Buckingham neighborhood should be consulted
• Current conditions make semi trucks unable to turn left and right at the intersection at
Linden/ Willow
• Driveways to houses at Buckingham should be eliminated and alley and ROW property
improved to make the alley access work
• Define public and private space in front of businesses and neighborhoods with low
walls, gates, low fences, etc.
• Consider shortening the median in front of Lincoln and 1st street and provide a left turn
lane for those traveling eastbound that need to turn left at this intersection
• If alleys are improved in the Buckingham neighborhood, consider lighting for safety,
concrete pad areas for garbage/ recycling, retrofitting existing garages for alley access,
demolishing existing driveways, providing carports for residents without garages, and
paving the alley
• Skinny Street allows flexibility for growth as land uses change over time
1
1
City Council Work Session
October 22, 2013
Lincoln Corridor Plan Update
2
General Direction Sought
and Specific Questions to be Answered
1. What feedback or questions does Council have on the
proposed draft corridor design alternatives?
2. Does Council have any comments or direction on how (or
whether) to proceed with the rail transit option?
3. Does Council have any comments or direction for staff on next
steps in the process; would Council like an additional Work
Session prior to the March 2014 adoption hearing?
ATTACHMENT 8
2
3
Lincoln
Corridor
4
Process/Schedule
Phase 1
Vision
• Mar – Jul 2013
Phase 2
Alternatives
• Aug – Oct 2013
Phase 3
Implementation
• Nov 2013 –
Mar 2014
We Are Here
3
5
Phase 1 – Vision
March – July 2013
Main Components:
• Project Goals
• Existing & Future
Conditions
• Case Studies
• Community Engagement
• Corridor Vision
Available at: www.fcgov.com/lincoln
6
Corridor Vision
The new Lincoln will be recognized as a Great
Street: an active and vibrant destination that
celebrates our history and is a model for
sustainability.
4
7
Corridor Design Alternatives
Design Elements being considered:
• Consistent sidewalks
• Protected or standard bicycle lanes
• Off-street multi-use paths
• Landscape medians
• On-street parking
• Access control
• Transit stops
• Streetscape amenities
8
Corridor Design Alternatives – Overview
Three corridor design alternatives:
• Alternative 1: Broad Boulevard
• Alternative 2: Modest Median
• Alternative 3: Skinny Street
Divided into three segments within each alternative:
• West Segment
• Central Segment
• East Segment
5
9
Defining Characteristics
10
Lincoln Corridor West – Broad Boulevard
6
11
Lincoln Corridor West – Modest Median
12
Lincoln Corridor West – Skinny Street
7
13
Lincoln Corridor Central – Broad Boulevard
14
Lincoln Corridor Central – Modest Median
8
15
Lincoln Corridor Central – Skinny Street
16
Lincoln Corridor East – Broad Boulevard
9
17
Lincoln Corridor East – Modest Median
18
Lincoln Corridor East – Skinny Street
10
19
Lincoln Corridor Bridge – Potential Concepts
20
Lincoln Corridor Bridge – Broad Boulevard
11
21
Lincoln Corridor Bridge – Modest Median
22
Lincoln Corridor Bridge – Skinny Street
12
23
Lincoln Corridor Site Amenity Themes
24
Lincoln Corridor - Transit Options
# Name Description
Capital /
Ongoing
Cost Est.
1 Maintain Existing Service • 30 minute (combined)
service connecting to MAX
None /
$450,000
2 Enhance Existing Service • 15 minute (combined)
service connecting to MAX
$800,000 /
$900,000
3 Downtown Circulator
Service w/Standard Bus
• Shuttle – 10 minute
frequency connecting to MAX
$800,000 /
$1,200,000
4 Downtown Circulator
Service w/Rubber-Tired
Custom Vehicle
• Shuttle – 10 minute
frequency connecting to MAX
$1,500,000 /
$1,200,000
5 Lincoln Avenue Trolley
(Rail)
• Trolley – One-mile rail route
(Mathews to Lemay) – 10
minute frequency
$23,000,000* /
$1,200,000
*Does not include cost of potential right-of-
way acquisition or new maintenance facility
13
25
Proposed Downtown Circulator Route
Downtown
Circulator
Route
Lincoln Avenue
Existing Routes 5, 14
26
Community Engagement – Phase 2
What We’ve Heard So Far – Key Points
• Concern over controlled access
• Concern over potential impacts to Buckingham
Neighborhood residents
• Concern over safety for pedestrian and bicyclists
• Support for a shared path
• Appreciation for Lincoln Bridge improvements
• Support for creating attractive streetscape
• Support for a Downtown Transit Circulator with a
custom vehicle
14
27
Next Steps
• Evaluate alternatives
• Draft Preferred Alternative (including Preliminary
Design)
• Identify related corridor projects in area
• Identify strategies and actions for implementation
• Develop Implementation, Funding and Phasing
Plan
• Draft Lincoln Corridor Plan document
28
Next Steps – Community Engagement
• Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
• Stakeholder Group
• Public Review of Preferred Plan
• Boards & Commissions
• City Council Adoption Hearing (March 2014)
Project Website: fcgov.com/lincoln
Base
Alternative
Alternative 2
Modest Median
Alternative 3
Skinny Street
Bridge
LINCOLN CORRIDOR PLAN - DESIGN ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION
Evaluation Criteria Ratings: Poor Fair Good
October 10, 2013 1
g to MAX
rculator Serv
0 minute freq
g to MAX
rculator Serv
Custom Veh
0 minute freq
g to MAX
ue Trolley (R
ail route (Ma
0 minute freq
ial right‐of‐w
hese will be r
ency
uency
service
n existing
rve Lincoln
service
vice Using
quency
vice Using
hicle
quency
ail)
thews to
quency
way acquisit
refined and
Likely
‐ Trans
popu
‐ Gree
‐ Trans
popu
‐ Gree
‐ Area
‐ Area
‐ Trans
popu
‐ Gree
‐ Area
‐ Area
‐ Area
‐ Trans
popu
‐ Gree
‐ Area
‐ Area
‐ Area
‐ Touri
‐ Trans
popu
‐ Gree
‐ Area
‐ Area
‐ Area
‐ Touri
tion or new m
incorporate
User Group
sit dependen
ulations
n Riders
sit dependen
ulations
n Riders
Residents
Employees
sit dependen
ulations
n Riders
Residents
Employees
Visitors
sit dependen
ulations
n Riders
Residents
Employees
Visitors
ists
sit dependen
ulations
n Riders
Residents
Employees
Visitors
ists
maintenance
ed into the L
ps
Ca
Ongoi
Cost
t N
$4
t
$80
$9
t
$80
$1,
t
$1,5
$1,
t
$23,0
$1,
e facility
Lincoln Corri
apital /
ing Annual
Estimate
None /
450,000
00,000 /
900,000
00,000 /
200,000
500,000 /
200,000
000,000* /
200,000
idor Preferre
Continuan
Unlikely t
Upgraded
Increases
Benefits e
and Lema
Additiona
Upgraded
Convenie
Corridor
Unknown
Additiona
Upgraded
Convenie
Corridor
Unknown
Upgraded
Tourist at
New spec
Potential
Dependin
be neede
Potential
Convenie
Corridor
Unknown
Tourist at
New spec
Higher m
Potential
Infrastruc
. Likely
. Upgra
. Need
. Crossi
. Bridge
. New t
ed Alternati
Cons
nce of existing
o meet future
d bus stops
convenience,
extend beyond
ay)
al vehicles and
d bus stops
nt trips betwe
n ridership pote
al vehicles and
d bus stops
nt trips betwe
n ridership pote
d bus stops
ttraction
cialty vehicles
for higher mai
ng on vehicle ty
d, e.g., electric
for innovative
nt trips betwe
n ridership pote
ttraction
cialty rail vehic
aintenance and
need for right‐
cture Upgrades
removal of ex
aded stops
for maintenan
ngs of existing
e widening ove
track installatio
ve
siderations
funding levels
demand on Lin
thus expandin
the Lincoln Co
operating cost
en downtown
ential
operational co
en downtown
ential
intenance and
ype additional
c charging facil
technologies
en downtown
ential
les
d operational c
‐of‐way‐acquis
s
isting median p
ce facility on r
g railroad track
er Poudre River
on
s
ncoln
ng ridership bas
orridor (Mulbe
ts
and Lincoln
osts
and Lincoln
operational co
infrastructure
ities
and Lincoln
costs
sition
parking
rail line
s
r
se
erry
osts
may
Vehicle T
Type
ATTACHMENT 5
• None
Access
• Potential Limited Access to Businesses as
Shown
On-Street Parking
• On-Street Parallel Parking on North Side of
Street
• Potential Future Parallel Parking on South Side
of Street
Landscape • Trees and Plantings at Street Edges, and in
Median where Possible
?
P
? ?
?
P P
P P P
EXISTING
BUS STOP
EXISTING
BUS STOP
October 10, 2013 10
• Shared Path on South Side
Access • Potential Limited Access to Businesses as
Shown
On-Street Parking • Angled Parking on North Side
• Potential Future Parallel Parking on South Side
Landscape • Trees and Plantings at Street Edges, and in
Median where Possible
?
P
P P P P
October 10, 2013 9
• Shared Path on North Side of Lincoln
Access
• Potential Limited Access to Businesses as
Shown
On-Street Parking • On-Street Parallel Parking on North Side of
Street
• Potential Future Parking in Median
Landscape • Trees and Plantings in Large Central Median
and at Street Edges
?
P
? ? ?
P P
P P P P
October 10, 2013 8
P
P
P P P P P P PPP
October 10, 2013 7
Neighborhood
Landscape
• Trees and Plantings at
Street Edges
?
P
P P
October 10, 2013 5
Decorating
Center
Access
Provided
from
Jefferson
Street
Access
Provided
from Willow
Street
EXISTING
BUS STOP
EXISTING
BUS STOP
EXISTING
BUS STOP
Poudre Trail
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
WALK
DRIVE
DRIVE
DRIVE
LEFT TURN
DRIVE
WALK
WALK
WALK
?
?
?
Alternative 3:
Skinny Street
WEST
Pedestrian
• Detached
Walks
• Some
Additional
ROW may be
Required on
South Side of
Street
Bicycle
• On-Street Bike
Lanes West of
Bridge
• Off-Street Bike
Lanes East of
Bridge
Shared Path
• None
Access • Potential
Limited Access
to Businesses
as Shown
On-Street
Parking
• No On-Street
Parking
Landscape
• Trees and
Plantings at
Street Edges
?
P
ral ra
October 10, 2013 4
Diamond Vogel
Paint and
Decorating
Center
EXISTING
BUS STOP
EXISTING
BUS STOP
EXISTING
BUS STOP
MULTI-USE PATH
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIOSWALE
DRIVE
DRIVE
LEFT TURN
DRIVE
DRIVE
WALK
WALK
WALK
?
?
?
?
Alternative 2:
Modest Median
WEST
Pedestrian
• Detached
Walks
• Some
Additional
ROW may be
Required on
South Side of
Street
Bicycle • On-Street Bike
Lanes
Shared Path
• Shared Path on
South Side of
Street
Access • Potential
Limited Access
to Businesses
as Shown
On-Street
Parking
• No On-Street
Parking
Landscape
• Trees and
Plantings at
Street Edges
?
P
aall a
October 10, 2013 3
DRIVE
DRIVE
DRIVE
DRIVE
WALK
WALK
WALK
Alternative 1:
Broad Boulevard
WEST
Pedestrian
• Attached and
Detached Walks
• No ROW
Acquisition
Bicycle • On-Street Bike
Lanes
Shared Path
• Shared Path for
Bicycles and
Pedestrians
North Side
Access
• Full Access to
Businesses from
Lincoln Existing
Businesses
On-Street
Parking
• No On-Street
Parking
Landscape
• Trees and
Plantings at
Street Edges
?
P
aall
October 10, 2013 2
Detached walks both sides Detached sidewalks on both
sides of the street with a
minimum of 6 feet in width.
Bicycle
One way on street bike lanes
both sides, shared path on north
side
One way on street bike lanes
both sides, shared path on
south side
One way off street bike lanes
both sides
On street bike lanes on both
sides of the street that are
eight feet in width.
Access
Potential limited access to some
businesses, as shown
Potential limited access to some
businesses, as shown
Potential limited access to some
businesses, as shown
Limited access. Points of
access must be approved by
the Local Entity.
On-Street Parking
On street parking north side of
street, potential future parking
in median. Approximate parking
count: 36 immediate spaces + 20
future spaces.
Angled parking on north side,
potential future parallel parking
on south side. Parking count:
63 immediate spaces + 42 future
spaces.
On street parallel parking north
side, potential future parallel
parking on south side. Parking
count: 21 immediate spaces + 18
future spaces.
None
Landscape Trees and plantings in large
central median and at street
edges
Trees and plantings at street
edges, and in medians
Trees and plantings at street
edge, and in median where
possible
Optional planted 12-foot
median and ten-foot tree
lawns on both sides of the
Neighborhood
Buffer
Shared path with landscape
area, potential limited access at
residential driveways, on street
parking
Detached walk with landscape
area, no on street parking
Attached walk with generous
landscape area, residential
parking in driveways within
ROW
Fifteen-foot utility easements
and ten-foot parkways on
both sides of the street
October 10, 2013 1
Could become a catalyst project for Northside
Neighborhoods
May enhance community pride
Attractive streets tend to attract high quality developments
and higher paying employment
New transportation vehicles may be prototyped within the
district near Woodward
OPPORTUNITIES:
Will be the first “New Great Street” project – if successful, may
create similar street opportunities across FC
Could develop new partnerships and collaborations with
breweries and future breweries
Could help develop new funding collaborations – sales tax,
DDA expansion, new business attraction
Utilizing local and sustainable materials reduces embedded
energy and life cycle costs
Could become a catalyst project for Northside Neighborhoods
Attractive streets tend to attract high quality developments and
higher paying employment
New transportation vehicles may be prototyped within the
district near Woodward
As corridor plan is implemented, increased opportunities to
improve flood protection and overall community resilience
The strategic nature of this planning document will allow for
quick implementation of some elements, which will allow
benefits to be realized more quickly
Consider additional outreach to other Breweries near corridor,
DBA regarding Brewery District concept.
OPPORTUNITIES:
The project has the opportunity to collaborate with other,
significant efforts in the Poudre River – synergies with this
project and the other, environmentally-focused efforts will
contribute to the City’s overall triple bottom line
Utilizing local and sustainable materials reduces
embedded energy and life cycle costs
Improved health benefits and air quality created by
encouraging more cycling and walking
Appropriate night lighting and street lighting can minimize
impacts on area wildlife
Appropriate landscaping can mitigate heat island effect
New transit vehicles may be prototyped and used in area
As corridor plan is implemented, increased opportunities
to improve flood protection and overall community
resilience
impacts
Street design will incorporate sustainability practices such
as “Green Street” and Low Impact Development (LID)
improvements (enhanced water quality measures)
LID treatment could improve habitat value of adjacent
Poudre River corridor
Increased urban tree canopy potential from landscaping
improvements
Reduce greenhouse emissions
Beautifying gateways - enhanced gateway to downtown
and to Mulberry Corridor and I-25.
New design could reduce speed limits and reduce fossil
fuel consumption
Can tie into Woodward enhancements along the Poudre
River Corridor
Appropriate landscaping can mitigate heat island effect
Opportunities for people to connect to nature and observe
/ learn about natural systems in adjacent Poudre corridor
and pocket areas
Will preserve environmental features in corridor
tential Key In
A. As indicate
equally im
Tripl
ts key inform
ncoln Corrid
ns. General
n key indicato
vations from
map was well
siderations cr
ing columns i
ing of rows in
identifies the
e TBL analysi
thorough than
. The social a
the opportuni
ss concerns re
ns highlight th
d to better und
w through this
s.
cussion around
tcome.
ity between th
oods is critica
onmental cons
fered:
fine TBL ana
ct has multiple
ion of preferre
ct has incorpo
stakeholders
ould be offere
ese stages we
some project
TBL part of y
de information
esses in all fut
raphic to illus
lpful in future
ndicators Su
ed during the
mportant to the
Lincoln
le Bottom L
Octo
mation extrac
or Plan staff
observation
ors and sugg
TBL Analys
l balanced wit
rossed into ma
ndicates exce
ndicates poten
Lincoln corri
is, the input f
n the feedback
aspects of a st
ity to celebrat
elated to enha
he short-term
derstand the lo
s area and wh
d the process
he Lincoln co
al.
siderations co
alysis again in
e phases and w
ed alternative
orated strong
to engage in
ed in the AIS
e brainstorme
flow and iter
your regular c
n on the short
ture communi
strate the stren
e communica
ggested:
TBL analysi
e planning ou
Corridor
Line Analysi
ober 10, 201
cted from th
f and consult
ns and conclu
gested action
sis Map :
th ample stren
any columns
ellent depth o
ntial for confl
idor as a Cata
for social stren
k entered into
treet/corridor
te the neighbo
anced property
(during const
ong-term con
hat will the im
of the plan’s
orridor, the D
ould/should b
n later phases
would benefit
e.
public engag
the public pro
as to where T
ed at the TBL
ration and re-i
communicatio
t-term and lon
ications.
ngths, limitati
ations.
s brainstormi
utcome.
r Plan
is – Synthes
3
he Triple Bot
tant project t
usions are hi
n items for th
ngths and lim
and rows.
f discussion a
licting values.
alyst Area; thi
ngths, limitat
o the other Ec
r cannot be un
orhoods, prov
y values and p
truction) impa
nsequences of
mpacts be on s
development
owntown, an
be strengthene
of the planni
t from additio
gement. The T
ocess regardi
TBL discussio
level”
iteration for a
on plan.
ng-term impa
ions, opportu
ing, the proce
sis
ttom Line A
team through
ighlighted, i
he Lincoln C
mitations ident
and debate.
.
is plan furthe
tions, opportu
conomic and E
nderstated in t
vide additiona
potential gen
acts to neighb
f this effort, e
surrounding n
t being equall
nd the surroun
ed through ad
ing process.
onal TBL ana
TBL analysis
ing the Brewe
ons occurred.
additional TB
acts to the nei
unities and thr
ess of develop
Analysis Map
h a series of
ncluding
Corridor Plan
tified.
er implements
unities and thr
Environment
this process,
al connectivity
ntrification.
bors and resid
.g., how will
neighbors and
ly important t
nding
dditional analy
alysis, ahead o
did identify a
ery District
BL analysis.
ghborhood an
reats for the p
ping this plan
1
p
f
n.
s City
reats
al
y,
dents
d
to the
ysis.
of
a few
nd
plan
is