HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 10/22/2013 - 2012 INTERNATIONAL CODES REVIEWDATE: October 22, 2013
STAFF: Mike Gebo
Pre-taped staff presentation: available
at fcgov.com/clerk/agendas.php
WORK SESSION ITEM
FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION
2012 International Codes Review.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this work session is to introduce the 2012 International Building Codes (2012 I-
Codes) and proposed local amendments for consideration of adoption.
The 2012 I-Codes represent the most up-to-date construction standards available establishing the
minimum requirements to safeguard the public health, safety, and general welfare by regulating
structural strength and stability, sanitation, light and ventilation, energy conservation, and property
protection from hazards attributed to the built environment within the City of Fort Collins. The
proposed 2012 International Codes and accompanying local amendments represent a
comprehensive, fully integrated body of codes regulating building construction and systems using
prescriptive and performance-related provisions.
The proposed local amendments strive to improve upon the 2012 I-Codes in areas that are of specific
importance to the citizens of the City of Fort Collins. The 2012 I-Codes under consideration are the
International Building Code (IBC), International Residential Code (IRC), International Mechanical
Code (IMC), International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC), and the International Energy Conservation Code
(IECC).
GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED
1. Does Council have any construction-related concerns or new ideas not currently addressed
or proposed to be addressed by the adoption of the 2012 I-Codes?
2. Does Council wish to adopt the residential sprinkler provisions as identified in the 2012
International Residential Code (IRC) in its entirety or by type of structure; duplex and
townhomes as an option and with implementation on July 1, 2014?
3. Does Council concur with staff presenting the adopting ordinances for Council’s
consideration on First Reading December 3, 2013?
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
History of Fort Collins’ Building Codes
The International Codes and standards are reviewed and voted on by construction industry
professionals from across the country and published every three years under the oversight of the
October 22, 2013 Page 2
International Code Council (ICC). The latest publications brought forth by the ICC are the proposed
2012 International Codes intended to replace the current City adopted 2009 International Codes.
Since 1924, the City of Fort Collins has periodically reviewed, amended, and adopted the latest
nationally recognized building standards available for the times. The City has updated the minimum
construction standards 13 times since 1924.
2012 International Codes Fort Collins’ Review Process
In August 2012, a committee was convened for the purpose of reviewing and recommending the
adoption of the proposed 2012 I-Codes and accompanying local amendments. The stakeholders’
code review committee represented a wide spectrum of volunteers from across the local construction
industry including private developers, builders, architects, engineers, building officials from
neighboring jurisdictions and representatives from the Building Review Board and the Poudre Fire
Authority. Please see Attachment 2 for the list of the code review committee members.
On October 2, 2013, the final code review committee meeting was held when committee members
voted in support of the 2012 I-Codes and accompanying local amendments as proposed. The
committee members voted support for:
• Requiring new multi-family buildings to provide fire-sprinklers in the attics.
• To disallow the use of vinyl siding on all new buildings.
• Proposed amendments expanding the Construction Waste Management Plan to include
remodel and additions and to establish a recycling policy for buildings being demolished for
commercial and residential.
• Requiring fire-sprinkler systems in new duplexes and new townhomes with an effective date
of July 1, 2014.
• Delaying fire-sprinklers in new single-family detached dwellings, preferring rather to have
new developments incorporate fire-sprinklers early in the development design stage.
Overview/Highlights of the 2012 International Codes Significant Changes
For a review of the 2012 International building Code (IBC), please see Attachment 3A for a quick
“at-a-glance” look at the significant proposed changes/amendments to commercial and multi-family
projects.
Code Review Committee Conclusion: Generally, there are no significant changes in the 2012 IBC
that the Committee considered to be controversial or overly expensive to new construction. The
proposed requirements that multi-family buildings provide fire-sprinklers in the attic and the issue
of vinyl siding were considered important discussion items.
For a review of the 2012 International Residential Code (IRC), please see Attachment 3B for an
“at-a-glance” look at the significant proposed changes/amendments to residential single-family,
duplex, and townhome buildings.
Code Review Committee Conclusion: The 2012 IRC requires that all new buildings constructed
under the IRC be provided with a fire-suppression system. A majority of the members voted for
October 22, 2013 Page 3
support for the fire-sprinkler requirement in new duplexes and new townhomes, and support an
effective date of July 1, 2014.
The Committee supports delaying fire-sprinklers in new single-family detached dwellings.
Members expressed support that new single-family developments be planned and designed with fire-
sprinkler systems from the early stages of development.
The remaining 2012 IRC and amendments were supported for adoption.
Key Discussion Items
IBC
1. Amend IBC Sections 903.2.8 and 903.3.1.2 to require that Group R-2 (Multi-family
occupancies) be provided with an NFPA 13 fire-sprinkler system which would provide
sprinkler heads in attic spaces.
2. Amend IBC Sections 1404.9 and 1404.12, deleting the use of vinyl and polypropylene siding
materials.
3. Amend IBC Section 3602.1 to require Construction Waste Management on remodels and
additions of 2,500 square feet, and to establish recycling procedures on buildings to be
demolished.
IRC
4. Amend IRC Section R313.1 to require fire-sprinkler systems in new duplex and new
townhomes effective July 1, 2014.
5. Amend IRC Section R313.2 delaying fire-sprinkler system in new single family detached.
6. Amend IRC Section R324.1 to require Construction Waste Management on remodels and
additions of 2,500 square feet, and to establish recycling procedures on buildings to be
demolished.
7. Amend IRC Sections R703.11 and R703.11.3 deleting the use of vinyl and polypropylene
siding materials.
Sprinkler Systems in Multi-family Buildings
One proposed amendment addresses the International Building Code (IBC) Sections 903.2.8 and
903.3.1.2, which requires that all multi-family buildings be provided with a fire-sprinkler system
of at least an NFPA 13R. In accordance with the NFPA 13R, the building’s attics do not need to be
provided with sprinkler heads. Add to this the use of vinyl siding on many multi-family buildings
and it is easy to see why the recent Buffalo Run and Bull Run fire damages were so extensive. Both
fires originated on the exterior of the building, igniting and melting the vinyl siding, exposing the
combustible sub-sheathing (plywood). The flames continued upward along the vinyl siding and
entered the attic through the vinyl soffit materials. Once the fire was in the unsprinkled attic, it
moved quickly and ultimately destroyed six dwellings in each project. Fire damage estimates are
$400,000 and $500,000 respectively.
The proposed amendments would eliminate the use of vinyl siding on all new buildings within the
City and require that all multi-family buildings be provided with a fire-suppression system of NFPA
October 22, 2013 Page 4
13, which would require that all attics be sprinkled. Please see Attachment 4 for an explanation of
costs due to installing the NFPA 13 system and replacing vinyl siding with hardboard siding.
Fire-Sprinkler Systems Overview
The 2012 IRC Section R313.1 requires that all new single-family, duplex, and townhomes be
provided with a residential fire-sprinkler system. Townhomes are identified as single-family
dwellings attached to another single-family dwelling where each owner purchases the ground
beneath their dwelling and a true property line is between each separate dwelling unit. There are
four types of fire-sprinkler systems available that comply with the IRC requirement. Please see
Attachment 5 for a description of the four types of fire-sprinkler systems.
Sprinkler System IRC Section P2904
The P2904 fire-sprinkler system is a combination potable cold water and fire-sprinkler system, an
extension of the dwelling unit’s cold water piping, and is the most cost effective system for the
duplex and townhomes. The P2904 system would not normally require a larger water tap than what
would be required for any new dwelling. In very large homes there may need to be an increase in
tap size in order to serve very long runs of water piping. Since the P2904 system is considered
plumbing, it must comply with the state-adopted International Plumbing Code (IPC), which requires
that water piping be installed in such a manner that the system will not be subject to freezing. The
chances of a failure of the P2904 system causing water damage due to leaks is no more or no less
likely than any potable water piping systems currently in use. Poudre Fire Authority reports that
staff has responded to 85 incidents in the past 3 years for failed fire-suppression systems. These
systems were predominately in commercial and multi-family buildings using the NFPA 13 and
NFPA 13R systems. There is no data on the failure rates of the P2904 system, due in part to its
limited use at this time.
When the IRC fire-sprinkler requirement was first introduced into the 2009 IRC, the cost of the
P2904 portion of the potable water system was anticipated to be in the $2.00-$2.50 per square foot
range using a Cross-linked Polyethylene Plastic (PEX) piping system. The PEX piping system is
the current leader in supplying materials and fittings for the P2904 system. The estimate shown
above was based on the low number of licensed plumbers that were familiar with the P2904 system
and the fact that very few systems were being installed. Current estimates and local experience with
the P2904 system over the past few years has brought the cost to about $1.50-$1.75 per square foot.
The International Code Council’s (ICC) philosophy around fire mitigation is that it is better to
extinguish a fire through fire-sprinkler systems than to contain a fire through fire-resistive
construction. Where the IRC requires a fire-sprinkler system, it also requires greater fire-resistive
construction where the fire-sprinkler system is not provided. Fire-resistive construction is achieved
through the installation of fire-rated wall or floor/ceiling assemblies that are one-hour or two-hour
fire rated. The required fire rating is achieved by the installation of multiple layers of gypsum
wallboard (sheetrock).
Please see Attachment 6 which is intended to show the cost of the P2904 system at $1.75 per square
foot and the cost of the fire-resistant construction when the P2904 system is not provided, using a
standard referenced house in the single-family detached dwelling, duplex, or townhome
configuration.
October 22, 2013 Page 5
Sprinkler System IRC Section P2904 Sustainable Benefits
The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) estimates that there will be 300,000-400,000
residential structure fires on average per year, resulting in 3,000-4,000 casualties across the country.
Since the early 2000s, numerous organizations have conducted independent testing of residential
fire-sprinkler systems using side-by-side mock-up structures, one space with sprinklers and the other
space with no sprinklers. The following agencies have conducted such testing:
• U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology (2002-2005),
• National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) (2002-2005 and 2012)
• The Fire Protection Research Foundation (2008)
• Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) (2003-2007)
• FM Global Research Division (2010)
• Disaster Safety (2012)
On average, the tests showed that a single fire-sprinkler head will activate within one minute of
ignition of the test materials. The sprinkler will maintain the fire to a small area or in many cases
will extinguish the flames before the fire department arrives. Poudre Fire Authority’s response time
is approximately eight minutes from being notified to applying water to the flames. The difference
between the sprinkler head applying water at approximately one minute compared to the fire
department’s application at about eight to nine minutes can result in significant damage to contents
or structure.
Please see Attachment 7 for data points on the testing results by agency. These tests conclude that
there are environmental sustainability benefits which strongly support the use of residential fire-
suppression systems in new dwellings.
The Insurance Service Office ISO rating
Fort Collins was recently evaluated by the Insurance Service Office (ISO); an independent rating
organization that reviews and evaluates a jurisdiction’s building department and code enforcement
capabilities. Based on this rating, insurance carriers can establish insurance rates for residential and
commercial buildings within the jurisdiction. The City’s rating remained a very good two for
commercial and had a slight drop from two to a three for residential. This reduction in the
residential rating may not have an impact of insurance premiums. Please see Attachment 8 for an
overview of the ISO program.
Outreach efforts
Over the past several months, staff has presented the 2012 I-Codes and proposed amendments to
numerous boards and commissions, builders and realtor groups. Minutes of these meetings are
pending. Overall there is general support to:
• Amend the IBC multi-family fire-sprinkler requirements and stipulate that attics of multi-
family buildings be provided with sprinkler heads using the NFPA 13 system.
• Disallow the use of vinyl siding on all new buildings throughout the City.
• Improve the Construction Waste Management Plan and develop recycling efforts for
buildings to be demolished.
October 22, 2013 Page 6
• Require that new duplexes and new townhomes constructed under the IRC be provided with
fire-sprinkler systems using the IRC P2904.
• Adopt the 2012 I-Codes with proposed amendments as presented.
Overall concerns include:
• The cost and timing of requiring fire-sprinklers in all new single-family detached dwellings,
preferring rather to have new single-family developments planned and designed to
incorporate fire-sprinkler systems in each new home.
• The plumbing contractors will be the tradespeople installing the IRC P2904 combination
potable water/fire-sprinkler system and many contractors may not be sufficiently trained in
the P2904 requirements. Staff supports delaying implementation of the P2904 fire-sprinkler
system in new duplexes and new townhomes until July1, 2014, allowing time for staff to
develop and schedule training of the P2904 system.
• The construction cost increases in general and specifically that energy efficiency
improvements beyond the proposed 2012 International Energy Code (IECC) may have reach
the point of diminished returns.
Please see Attachment 9 for the list of boards and commissions and dates of presentations, along
with a brief overview of comments.
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Building codes establish minimum construction standards to safeguard the public health, safety, and
general welfare. With each new edition of the International Building Codes, significant changes are
made that directly benefit and protect the consumer and users of the built environment, including
fire-responder safety. It is estimated that the entire package of significant changes if adopted, could
increase the cost of a single-family home on the order of $7,000 - $8,000, while having a positive
effect on the environment by improving indoor air quality, energy efficiency of the buildings,
incorporating safety requirements that serve the occupants and public while lessening the likelihood
of structural failures.
The code review committee considered the impacts to the Triple Bottom Line during the review
process. Since the code review work started in August 2012 it was deemed too late in the process
to do a standardized TBLAM.
ATTACHMENTS
1. I-Codes overview
2. Code review committee members
3. A. Significant changes to IBC commercial and multi-family
B. Significant changes to IRC single-family, duplex, and townhomes.
4. Multi-family sprinkler and vinyl siding cost estimates
5. Fire sprinkler systems overview
6. Cost estimates P2904 or fire-resistive construction
7. Residential sprinkler reports supporting environmental benefits
8. Insurance Service Office (ISO) information
October 22, 2013 Page 7
9. Boards and commissions feedback
10. Powerpoint presentation
Community Development & Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580
970.416.2740
970.224.6134- fax
fcgov.com
Planning, Development & Transportation Services
2012 International Codes (I-Codes) Overview
2012 International Building Code (IBC): Minimum standards regulating construction of all
commercial and all multi-family residential projects not regulated under the IRC). There
are no new codes or proposed amendments that were deemed to be controversial.
2012 International Residential Code (IRC): Minimum standards regulating construction of all
single-family, duplex, and townhome projects. This stand-alone code includes minimum
standards for associated sub-trades such as plumbing, electric, mechanical and fuel gas
appliances. The fire-sprinkler requirement for new buildings constructed under the IRC is
the most controversial item of the entire code package. There is support for requiring
fire-sprinklers in the duplex and townhome buildings and delaying implementation until
July 1, 2014. The delay is to allow time to train the plumbing industry in the installation
of the combination potable water/fire suppressions system identified in the IRC, the
P2904. There is some support for fire-sprinklers in new single-family homes when new
developments are planned and designed with fire-sprinklers as a requirement in each
new home, possibly allowing for fewer fire hydrants and narrower streets.
2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC): Minimum standards regulating the installation of
all mechanical air handling systems for buildings constructed under the IBC. There are
no new codes or proposed amendments that were deemed to be controversial.
2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC): Minimum standards regulating the installation of all
natural gas and propane fueled appliances and equipment for buildings constructed under
the IBC. There are no new codes or proposed amendments that were deemed to be
controversial.
2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC): Establishes minimum energy efficiency
criteria for all commercial and four-story multi-family residential projects constructed
under the IBC. The International Code Council (ICC) anticipates that the new 2012
IECC will improve energy efficiency of new buildings by approximately 15%-19% over
the current 2009 IECC. Fort Collins Utilities’ staff estimate that in new single family
dwellings, the annual savings in energy related cost to the consumer to be in the $110.00-
$125.00 range.
The National Electric Code and the International Plumbing Code are adopted by the State of
Colorado and accepted by the City without the need for review.
ATTACHMENT 1
2012 I-Code Review Committee Members
Stephen Steinbicker 970-207-0424 steve@architecturewestllc.com
John McCoy 970-226-5511 Jmccoy1900@hotmail.com
Dave Phillips 970-672-0089 dave@philgreenco.com
John Sailer 970-412-9605 sailerj@gmail.com
Stan Griep 970-498-7714 sgriep@larimer.org
Dave Sanders 970-631-2666 dave@greenteamre.com
Darren Haun 970-372-0212 dhaun@horizonsm.com
Ceri Jones 970-567-9717 ceri@tritoncommunities.com
Arnold Drennen 970-482-9100 jarnold@drennencc.com
Mike Doddridge 970-218-3120 mjd@doddridgeconstruction.com
Steve Spanjer 970-223-2664 steves@spanjer.com
Mark Foster 970-352-7072 mark@journeyhomes.com
Dwight Sailer 970-566-9931 dwight@highcraft.net
Jon Tschetter 970-222-8200 jon.tschetter@tschetco.com
Russ Weber 970-545-3502 rweber@safebuilt.com
Carl Glaser carl@archbuild.com
Matt Rankin 970-224-0630 mrankin@rankinarchitects.com
Jeff Schneider 970-566-9971 jeff@armsteadconstruction.com
Mike Gebo 970-416-2618 mgebo@fcgov.com
Russ Hovland 970-416-2341 rhovland@fcgov.com
Lisa Schoenfeld 970-416-2640 lschoenfeld@fcgov.com
Sarah Carter 970-416-2748 scarter@fcgov.com
Angelina Sanchez Sprague 970-221-6525 asanchezsprague@fcgov.com
ATTACHMENT 2
Community Development & Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580
970.416.2740
970.224.6134- fax
fcgov.com
Planning, Development & Transportation Services
Significant Changes Proposed for Adoption of the
2012 International Building Code (IBC)
Applicable to all Commercial and Multi-Family Buildings
1. New amendment proposal requiring National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 13 fire
suppressions system in multi-family buildings. (Current code allows NFPA.13R which is
a residential sprinkler system that does not require sprinkler heads in the attic.)
2. New amendment proposal that requires bedroom egress windows sills to be at least 24
inches above the floor when the window sill height is 72 inches or more above ground in
multi-family buildings. (Intended to prohibit emergency escape window sills being
placed lower than 24 inches from the floor. Window sills below 24 inches would require
“fall protection” devices which can inhibit egress operations through the window.)
3. New amendment proposal will require radon systems be installed in new buildings of I-1
occupancies and I-2 nursing homes. (These are long term residential uses.)
4. New amendment proposal to delete Vinyl and Polypropylene siding. (Due to vinyl
siding’s flammable properties and recent multi-family fires at Bull Run and Buffalo Run
apartments involving vinyl siding products.)
5. Chapter 36 Sustainable Building Construction Practices (Green Code Amendments
adopted January 2012) carried over as basic local amendments:
a. New amendment proposal would expand the Construction Waste Management
Plan to be applicable to not only new buildings but to also be applicable to
remodel work and addition work when the work involved exceeds 2,500 square
feet.
b. New amendment proposal would require that whole buildings being demolished
shall first have all contaminated materials removed such as asbestos and lead
paints, then Soft-Stripped removing reusable items such as doors, windows,
fixtures, and cabinets for recycling where available. The remaining wood,
concrete and masonry, steel, and cardboards shall be recycled in accordance with
the Construction Waste Management Plan.
c. New amendment proposal requiring verification documentation that identifies the
materials recycled in accordance with the Construction Waste Management Plan.
Documentation required prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
d. The remaining Chapter 36 retained and unchanged addressing:
i. Low-volatile organic compounds (VOC) which establishes limits on
harmful gas emissions of construction products,
ii. Ductwork controls limiting construction debris and dust.
iii. New Building Flush-Out requirements
iv. Acoustical controls and sound transmission
ATTACHMENT 3A
2012 IBC
Proposed Changes
- 2 -
v. Building systems commissioning assuring that the following systems have
been installed and tested to operate as designed:
1. HVAC
2. Thermal envelope tightness
3. Lighting controls
4. Service water heating
5. Renewable energy systems
6. Background sound levels
7. New, Cooling tower water use
Community Development & Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580
970.416.2740
970.224.6134- fax
fcgov.com
Planning, Development & Transportation Services
Significant Changes Proposed for Adoption of the
2012 International Residential Code (IRC)
Applicable to New Single-family; Duplex; and Townhomes
1. Keep existing amendments establishing fire-ratings of exterior walls due to location on
the property in relation to property lines and the fire-ratings at the common walls
separating dwelling units. (Dependent on whether the code required fire-suppression
system is adopted)
(A majority of the code review committee members support requiring fire sprinklers in
new duplex and new townhomes effective July 1, 2014. The committee members did have
support for the code requirement that sprinklers be installed in new single family
dwellings but only in new subdivisions where fire-sprinklers are planned for each
dwelling and consideration for trade-offs could be incorporated such as narrower streets
or fewer fire hydrants as a possibility. This proposal needs to be vetted through a Land
Use Code change and is not considered part of this code review.)
2. New amendment proposal that requires bedroom egress windows sills to be at least 24
inches above the floor when the window sill height is 72 inches or more above ground in
dwellings. (Intended to prohibit emergency escape window sills being placed lower than
24 inches from the floor. Window sills below 24 inches would require “fall protection”
devices which can inhibit egress operations through the window.)
3. New amendment proposal requiring basement window wells to be provided with
drainage and the drain inlet to be at least 4 inches below the window sill. (Intended to
divert rain and surface water away from entrance into the basement window)
4. Keep existing amendments carried over from the Green Code Amendments adopted
January of 2012. (No longer identified as Green Code Amendments, but rather simply
local amendments), including:
a. New amendment proposal would expand the Construction Waste Management
Plan to be applicable to not only new buildings but to also be applicable to
remodel work and addition work when the work involved exceeds 2,500 square
feet.
b. New amendment proposal would require that whole buildings being demolished
shall first have all contaminated materials removed such as asbestos and lead
paints, then Soft-Stripped removing reusable items such as doors, windows,
fixtures, and cabinets for recycling where available. The remaining wood,
concrete and masonry, steel, and cardboards shall be recycled in accordance with
the Construction Waste Management Plan.
c. New amendment proposal requiring verification documentation that identifies the
materials recycled in accordance with the Construction Waste Management Plan.
Documentation required prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
ATTACHMENT 3B
2012 IRC
Significant Proposed Amendments
- 2 -
d. Keep Low-volatile organic compounds which establishes limits on harmful gas
emissions of construction products,
e. Keep Exterior “Dark Sky” lighting (New clarification to reflect the International
Dark-Sky Association (IDA) Lighting Zone-1 (LZ-1) which indicates that the lamp
or the light shall not be directly visible beyond the property line.).
f. Keep existing amendments which require mechanical system testing, building air-
tightness testing, and mandatory requirements for insulation installation,
combustion safety testing and garage to home isolation testing.
g. Keep existing amendments which set maximum flow rates of plumbing fixtures.
h. Keep whole-house ventilation (WHV) system and providing clarity on how the
system is to operate and owner controls.
5. New amendment proposal requiring electrically heated homes shall show energy
compliance by the prescriptive path charts. (Intent is to disallow the use of an energy
rating computer program such as RESNET or U of A Performance Path which allows for
trade-offs of the insulation values. Electrically heated home will now need to meet the
more restrictive prescriptive path.)
6. New amendment proposal clarifying that HVAC ductwork shall not be located outside
the interior vapor barrier. (In other words, all duct work shall not be located in the
exterior wall insulation.)
7. New amendment proposal requiring that dwellings with any gas cooking (not just gas
ovens) will be required to have a range hood vented to the outside.
Estimates of cost
1. Multi-family sprinklers using National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 13 in
lieu of NFPA 13R.
2. Vinyl siding versus hardboard siding.
1) The current average local rate to install a NFPA 13R is about $2.00 per square
foot. NFPA 13 is about $2.75 per square foot or about a 35% increase in the cost of the
sprinkler system.
An average multi-family building comparable to the Bull Run apartments would be a
twelve-plex (12 units) of 1,000 square feet each unit, this estimate equates to an increase
cost of $9,000 to install the NFPA 13 over the NFPA 13R.
2) Vinyl siding cost difference is in the materials alone as the installation should be
equal, although some contractors indicate that the vinyl siding is actually more expensive
to install, supposedly vinyl materials are difficult to work with.
The cost of vinyl siding material is approximately $0.84 per square foot, where a more
fire-resistant hardboard siding is approximately $1.25 per square foot.
Using the same example twelve-plex at 4,000 square foot per floor and a perimeter of 65
feet x 60 feet three stories in height, the estimated siding area is approximately 7,200
square feet. The increased cost to move from vinyl siding to a hardboard siding is
approximately $0.41 per square foot or $2950.00 for this sample project.
ATTACHMENT 4
Community Development & Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580
970.416.2740
970.224.6134- fax
fcgov.com
Planning, Development & Transportation Services
Fire-sprinkler Systems Overview
1. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 13 (Commercial) which is classified as a
“stand-alone” fire-suppression system for use in any building. The system is piped separately
from other water systems and all concealed spaces must be protected with sprinkler heads
including closets and garages. This system would not typically be installed in IRC buildings
due to excessive installation cost. Requires a contractor with a fire-suppression installation
license.
2. NFPA 13R (Residential) which is classified as a “stand-alone” fire-suppression system for
use in multi-family buildings. The system is piped separately from other water systems and
certain spaces must be protected with sprinklers, including larger closets and garages. This is
the fire-suppression system installed in multi-family buildings constructed under the IBC.
Requires a contractor with a fire-suppression installation license.
3. NFPA 13D (Dwelling) which is classified as a “stand-alone” fire-suppression system for use
in single-family detached buildings. The system is piped separately from other water systems
and only major habitable spaces must be protected with sprinklers. This is one of two fire-
suppression systems that would most likely be installed in single-family dwellings
constructed under the IRC. Requires a contractor with a fire-suppression installation license.
4. IRC Section P2904 (Plumbing system) is a dwelling unit fire-suppression system which is
classified as combination potable water and fire-suppression system. The cold water piping is
interconnected between plumbing fixtures to sprinkler heads throughout the dwelling unit.
This is the newest and most cost effective sprinkler system for IRC constructed buildings; it
was designed specifically to satisfy the 2009 IRC requirement that all new single-family,
duplex, and townhome dwellings be provided with a fire-suppression system. The State of
Colorado Plumbing Board has determined that this system is considered plumbing and
licensed plumbing contractors can install the system without the special fire-suppression
system installation license.
ATTACHMENT 5
International Residential Code IRC Section P2904
Sprinkler vs. No Sprinkler Cost Comparison
Standard referenced home:
Single-family two-story 2,000 sq. ft. finished
1,000 sq. ft. unfinished basement 25 feet x 40 feet
Estimated cost of P2904 sprinkler system at $1.75/ sq. ft.
Standard referenced home cost $5,250.00
IRC Code section requirement
Single-family homes With Sprinklers Without Sprinklers
R313.2. Fire-suppression required $5,250.00
R501.3 Fire protection of floors when I-Joist floor system
used (typical construction). (drywall at $1.00/sq..)
$0.00 (not required w/sprinklers) $1,000.00 (ceiling on basement
ceiling)
Code cost estimate $5,250.00 $1,000
Duplex (Two-family homes) With Sprinklers Without Sprinklers
R313.2. Fire-suppression required times 2 units $10,500.00
R501.3 Fire protection of floors when I-Joist floor system
used (typical construction). (drywall at $1.00/sq. ft.)
(basement floor area times 2 units)
$0.00 (not required w/sprinklers) $2,000.00 (sheetrock on basement
ceiling)
R302.2 Walls separating two-family dwellings need to be two-
hour rated (2 layers of drywall per each unit) (Standard
referenced home common wall. 40 feet deep x 8 feet tall x 3
floors x one additional layer gypsum each unit times 2 units)
$1,920 (additional drywall at
common wall)
Code cost estimate $10,500.00 $3,920
ATTACHMENT 6
1
Townhomes (single-family attached to single-family
property line) (each townhome a separate referenced home)
With Sprinklers Without Sprinklers
R313.2. Fire-suppression required $5,250.00
R501.3 Fire protection of floors when I-Joist floor system
used (typical construction). (drywall at $1.00/sq. ft.)
$0.00 (not required w/sprinklers) $1,000.00 (sheetrock on basement
ceiling)
R302.2 Walls separating townhomes need to be two-hour
rated (2 layers of drywall per each unit) (Standard referenced
home common wall. 40 feet deep x 8 feet tall x 3 floors x one
additional layer gypsum per unit)
$960.00 (additional drywall at
common wall)
Code cost estimate $5,250.00 $1,960
2
Community Development & Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580
970.416.2740
970.224.6134- fax
fcgov.com
Planning, Development & Transportation Services
Residential Sprinkler Reports
NISTIR Report 7451 (reporting period 2002-2005)
U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology
Benefit Cost Analysis of Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems
Owners of homes with Fire-Suppressions Systems (sprinkler systems) installed benefit from;
1.) Reduction in the risk of civilian fatalities and injuries
2.) Reduction in homeowner’s insurance premiums
3.) Reduction in uninsured direct property loss
4.) Reduction in uninsured indirect cost.
Homes equipped with smoke alarms and sprinklers experienced
1.) 100% fewer civilian fatalities
2.) 57% fewer civilian injuries
3.) 32% less direct and indirect property loss verses homes with just smoke alarms.
4.) According to the Insurance Service Office (ISO) insurance premiums were reduced by
approximately 8%.
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA 2006) (reporting period 2002-2005).
1.) There were 296,500 residential fires (one and two-family dwellings)
2.) Causing 10,188 civilian injuries
3.) Causing 2566 civilian deaths
4.) Responsible for $5.3 billion (2005 dollars) in direct residential property loss
5.) No civilian deaths in residential fires when provided with sprinkler systems
NISTIR Report 7277 (reporting period 2005)
U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology
Economic Analysis of Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems
1.) Using the multi-purpose network into the cold-water plumbing system (2012
International Residential Code (IRC) Section P-2904). The sprinkler system is an
extension of the buildings cold-water system and is equivalent to NFPA 13D Standard
for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two- family Dwellings and
Manufactured Homes.
2.) Labor and material for the sprinkler system only added to the potable water system
ranges from $0.48 to $0.57 per square foot, minus overhead and profit. (Local market
pricing of $1.25 to $2.00 per square foot has been reported)
ATTACHMENT 7
Residential Sprinkler
- 2 -
The Fire Protection Research Foundation
Home Fire Sprinkler Cost Assessment (September 2008) (Updated September 2013 Ft Collins
Colorado average $1.55 to $2.32 per square foot)
1.) Using thirty (30) housing floor plans in ten (10) communities, one (1) in Canada and nine
(9) throughout the US. Total area sprinkled includes basements, garages, and attics. (2012
IRC P2904 would not require garages and attics to be sprinkled)
2.) The cost range from $0.38 to $3.66 per square foot. The low range represents a California
community with long standing ordinance requiring sprinkler systems and some potential
for pricing benefits based on volume of homes being sprinkled. The high range represents
a Colorado mountain home on well water, using an antifreeze system with copper piping.
3.) The average cost to the builder was $1.49 per square foot. Higher cost per square footage
were associated with local requirements for use of copper pipe versus CPVC or PEX
plastic piping, on-site water supply versus municipal services, requirements to sprinkle
attics and garages, and whether a stand-alone or combination potable water/sprinkler
system was used.
4.) Five insurance companies with a market share of the communities surveyed reported a
premium discount from 0% to 10% with an average premium discount of 7%.
The Fire Protection Research Foundation
Home Fire Sprinkler Impact on Fire Injury (October 2012)
1.) The analysis hypothesized that by making smaller fires, sprinklers might reduce the
frequency of injuries and the average severity of the injuries.
2.) The model used the impact on injuries per one hundred (100) fires and injury cost per one
hundred (100) fires. Cost data included: medical cost, legal and liability cost, cost from
lost work time, and pain and suffering cost. Medical cost was evaluated separately from
the other items identified as total cost.
3.) Primary results indicate that:
a. Sprinkler presence is associated with a 29% reduction in injuries per one hundred
(100) reported fires
b. Sprinkler presence is associated with a 48% reduction in medical cost
(approximately $85,000.00) of injuries per one hundred (100) reported fires
c. Sprinkler presence is associated with a 40% reduction in total cost (approximately
$442,000.00) of injuries per one hundred (100) reported fires.
4.) Results by age of victim:
a. Children (age 14 and under) a sprinkler presence is associated with:
i. A 72% reduction in the number of fire injuries per one hundred (100)
reported fires
ii. A 85% reduction in medical cost of injuries per one hundred (100)
reported fires
iii. A 78% reduction in total cost of injuries per one hundred (100) reported
fires.
(Children are much less likely to be cooking where a vast majority of small fires begin.)
b. Adults (age 15 to 64) a sprinkler presence is associated with:
i. A 30% reduction in the number of fire injuries per one hundred (100)
reported fires
Residential Sprinkler
- 3 -
ii. A 52% reduction in medical cost of injuries per one hundred (100)
reported fires
iii. A 39% reduction in total cost of injuries per one hundred (100) reported
fires.
c. Older adults (age 65 and older) a sprinkler presence is associated with:
i. A 12% increase in the number of fire injuries per one hundred (100)
reported fires
ii. A 41% reduction in medical cost of injuries per one hundred (100)
reported fires
iii. A 23% reduction in total cost of injuries per one hundred (100) reported
fires.
(The hypothesis cites that sprinklers make for smaller fires and that a smaller fire may
seem easier to fight. Injuries are increased particularly in older adults as it appears that
this age group more often attempts fire-fighting efforts.)
Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA)
Residential Fire Sprinkler Activation Report (January 2003 to June 2007)
1.) The Residential Fire Sprinkler Activation project is an on-line data gathering system used
by the National Association of State Fire Marshals (NASFM) and the Residential Fire
Sprinkler Institute (RFSI). The purpose is to gather current and relevant data pertaining to
the activation of residential fire sprinklers, information necessary to assess the
performance of these systems in real-life, non-laboratory conditions.
2.) In this reporting period 89 fire departments participated, reporting 556 incidents.
3.) Reporting data:
a. 62% of the activations were in multi-family buildings, 17.9% in single family
buildings.
b. 40.6 % of the activations were in the kitchen with bedrooms second at 14.5%
c. Over 60% of the activations were in rooms of less than 150 square feet
d. Over 67% of the activations involved just one fast-response sprinkler head
e. While 73% of the activation included a smoke detector, only 58% of the detectors
operated.
f. Over 47% of the incidents estimate dollars saved in the $250,000 range
g. Over 57% of the incidents report a dollar loss of under $5,000
FM Global Research Division
Environmental Impact of Automatic Fire Sprinklers (March 2010)
1. Two identical structure fire tests, one test included a single fire sprinkler head; the second
test had no sprinklers.
2. A single fire event can negate any benefits from “green” construction due to the
subsequent carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases generated from burning
combustible materials, in addition to the carbon associated with disposal of damaged
materials and reconstruction, increasing “lifecycle carbon emission”.
3. The combustible material consumed in the tests was 3% in the sprinklered test and
between 62% and 95% in the non-sprinklered test.
4. The use of automatic fire sprinklers reduced the greenhouse gas emissions, consisting of
carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide by 97%.
Residential Sprinkler
- 4 -
5. Analysis of the tests indicates that the reduction in water use achieved by using sprinklers
could be as much as 91% when extrapolated to a full-sized home.
Disaster Safety
Residential Fire Sprinklers (August 2012)
1. According to the U.S. Fire Administration (USFA), in 2007, 414,000 residential fires
resulted in 2,895 deaths and 14,000 injuries, causing $7.5 billion in property damage.
2. 90% of house fires with sprinkler systems are contained by the operation of a single
sprinkler head.
3. In 1992 Prince George’s County in Maryland enacted sprinkler ordinance mandating the
installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems in new one- and two-family dwellings.
a. A study of Prince George’s ordinance issued in 2009 stated that from 1992-2007
there were 13,494 fires involving single-family homes, resulting in 101 deaths
and 328 injuries in non-sprinklered homes.
b. No deaths and only 6 injuries in homes with sprinkler systems.
c. Since the ordinance went into effect the cost of sprinkler systems have decreased
to less than $2.00 per square foot, according to sprinkler installers in the area.
4. Scottsdale Arizona enacted their sprinkler ordinance in 1986 and reported that:
a. The average fire loss in in a house with a sprinkler system was $1,544, compared
to $11,624 for houses without fire- sprinkler systems.
b. The average sprinkler used 357 gallons of water per incident to extinguish the
fire, while manual fire-fighting would have equaled 4,884 gallons of water per
incident to extinguish the same fires.
c. Because sprinklers activate within a few minutes of the ignition, suppression
efforts are underway before the arrival of fire department personnel, which can be
in the 8-10 minute range.
Insurance Service Office (ISO) Overview
The Insurance Service Office (ISO) is an independent rating organization that reviews
and evaluates a jurisdiction’s building department and code enforcement capabilities.
Through a survey, the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS), ISO
evaluates the building codes adopted by the jurisdiction, staffing levels, staff’s
credentials, the number of permits issued and inspected, department budget, and
population, and with this data assigns the jurisdiction a rating score of 1-3, 4-6, 7-9, and
10 with 10 being the least favorable rating. The rating can then be used by local insurance
carriers to help set insurance premium rates for homes and businesses. The philosophy
and understanding of the ISO program is that with better code enforcement by a
jurisdiction, less building failures are likely, resulting in lower insurance premiums.
Fort Collins was evaluated by ISO in early 2008 and at that time received a rating of two
(2) for residential and two (2) for commercial, placing Fort Collins within the favorable
highest rating bracket, 1-3. At that time the 2009 IRC and its residential sprinkler system
requirement was not available for adoption. Since the 2008 ISO survey there have been
two editions of the IRC published, both included the residential fire sprinkler provision.
ISO has just completed the 2013 survey and review portion of the City’s evaluation. The
evaluation and rating, if not amended within a year, will establish a final rating of two (2)
for commercial and a three (3) for residential. While the ratings of two (2) for
commercial and three (3) for residential keep the City positioned within the most
favorable bracket of 1-3, the City now has the opportunity to develop a plan-of-action for
reinstating the rating two (2) for residential and submit it to ISO before November 11,
2013. The plan-of-action will outline the proposed steps to be taken by Building Services
and establish a timeframe for completion of steps needed to improve the residential
rating. The ISO proposed rating of three (3) for residential will not be finalized until such
time that the plan-of-action can be implemented by the City and reviewed by ISO later
next year 2014. Adoption of the 2012 IRC including the residential fire-sprinkler
provisions in part, could elevate the City’s residential rating from (3) to a (2). In any
event, the City’s proposed ISO rating of (3) for residential may not have a negative
impact on local insurance rates since Fort Collins will remain within the most favorable
1-3 rating bracket.
ATTACHMENT 8
2012 International Codes
Boards and Commissions Presentations
8/15/2013 Water Board members support for the adoption of the 2012 I-Codes as
presented, including the IRC sprinkler provisions, the multi-family sprinkler issue, and
the vinyl siding concern.
8/21/2013 Natural Resource Advisory Board members support for the adoption of the
2012 I-Codes as presented, including the IRC sprinkler provisions, the multi-family
sprinkler issue, and the vinyl siding concern.
8/22/2013 Commission on Disability members support for the adoption of the 2012 I-
Codes as presented, with some support for the IRC sprinkler provisions, the multi-family
sprinkler issue, and the vinyl siding concern.
9/5/2013 Affordable Housing Board members support for the adoption of the 2012 I-
Codes as presented. Concerns over the cost increase for the single-family sprinklers,
support for the multi-family sprinkler issue and the vinyl siding concern.
9/5/2013 Energy Board members support for the adoption of the 2012 I-Codes as
presented including the multi-family sprinkler issue and the vinyl siding concern. Board
was split on supporting of the single family sprinkler requirements.
9/11/2013 Home Builders Association Northern Colorado members support for the
adoption of the 2012 I-Codes as presented including the multi-family sprinkler issue and
the vinyl siding concern. The members supported the single-family sprinklers
requirements but only in new developments where there could be fewer fire hydrants and
narrow streets as a trade-off. The members could support single-family sprinklers if there
were a City incentive involved, possibly a reduction in the permit cost or reduction in
some other fee to help offset the sprinkler cost.
9/19/2013 Board of Realtors (General member group) members support for the adoption
of the 2012 I-Codes as presented including the multi-family sprinkler issue and the vinyl
siding concern. The members recognized and appreciated the sustainable aspects of fire-
sprinklers but were concerned over the installation costs.
9/26/2013 Building Review Board members support the 2012 I-Codes as presented
including the multi-family sprinkler issue and the vinyl siding concern. The members
support the IRC sprinkler requirements for new duplexes and new townhomes and would
support sprinklers in new single-family homes in new subdivisions where the
development was designed around sprinkled homes.
10/1/2013 Poudre Fire Authority Board
10/2/2013 Code Review Committee members (final meeting) voted to support the IRC
fire sprinkler requirement in duplexes and townhomes with an effective date of July 1,
ATTACHMENT 9
2014. Members support the single family detached dwelling sprinkler requirement in new
developments where the design and planning incorporate fire sprinklers in each new
home while considering narrower streets or fewer hydrants. Members voted to support
that IBC multi-family buildings be provided with NFPA 13 fire suppression systems and
approved the deletion of all vinyl siding on new buildings.
10/4/2013 Planning and Zoning
10/8/2013 Board of Realtors (Government affairs group)
10/21/2013 Air Quality Advisory Board
1
1
Fort Collins City Council
Work Session
October 22, 2013
2012 International Codes
Michael Gebo, Chief Building Official
Community Development & Neighborhood Services
2
Purpose of Discussion
Introducing the 2012 International Codes and
proposed amendments
2012 International Building Code (IBC)
2012 International Residential Code (IRC)
2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
ATTACHMENT 10
2
3
Replacing Current Codes
2009 International Building Code (IBC)
2009 International Residential Code (IRC)
2009 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
2009 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
(Adopted October 2010)
4
Executive Summary
• 2012 International Codes:
– Represent the most up-to-date building codes,
– Establish minimum construction standards to
safeguard the public health, safety and welfare,
– Regulating structural strength and stability,
sanitation, light and ventilation, energy conservation,
and property protection.
3
5
General Direction Sought
• Does Council have any construction related concerns or
new ideas not proposed to be addressed?
• Does Council wish to adopt the fire sprinkler provisions of
the 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) in its entirety
or by type of structure; duplex and townhomes with
implementation on July 1, 2014?
• Does Council concur with the adopting timeline of January
2014?
6
Background
• 2012 I-Codes are published by the International
Code Council (ICC), on a three-year cycle.
• City adoption of the most up-to-date construction
standards has been an ongoing process since
1924.
4
7
Background
2012 I-Code review committee:
– Front Range construction professionals,
– Started review in August 2012,
– Evaluated significant changes and local
amendments,
– Voted Oct 2013 to support the 2012 I-Codes.
8
2012 International Building Code
Key discussion topics proposed amendments:
– Changes to fire-sprinkler systems in multi-
family requiring attics to be protected,
– Elimination of vinyl siding products,
– Require construction waste and recycling on
remodels and establish recycling policy for
demolitions.
5
9
Fire-Sprinklers
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
Fire-sprinkler systems:
– NFPA 13
– NFPA 13R (IBC Key Topic)
– NFPA 13D
– IRC P2904 (IRC Key Topic)
10
Multi-Family Concerns
Current code:
– Fire-sprinklers of NFPA 13R, attics not
required to be sprinkled
– Vinyl siding materials allowed.
Proposed amendment:
– Require NFPA 13 sprinklers, attics would be
fire-sprinkled
– Dis-allow the use of vinyl siding city-wide.
6
11
Vinyl Siding Buffalo Run
12
Vinyl Siding Buffalo Run
7
13
Attic Not Sprinkled
14
Buffalo Run Example
Multi-family proposed changes
12 units, floor area 12,000 square feet
– NFPA 13R @ $2.00 per sq. ft. $24,000.00
– NFPA 13 @ $2.75 per sq. ft. $33,000.00
Exterior wall area 7,200 square feet
– Vinyl Siding $0.84 per sq. ft. $6,048.00
– Hardboard Siding $1.25 per sq. ft. $9,000.00
8
15
Buffalo Run Example
Multi-family proposed changes
Cost increase estimate:
– NFPA 13 fire sprinkler $9,000.00
– Hardboard siding $2,950.00.
Total estimate increase = $11,952.00
– Approximately $1,000.00 per dwelling.
Fire damage estimate $400,000.00-$500,000.00.
16
Construction Waste
(Commercial and Residential)
Key discussion topics proposed amendments:
– Require a Construction Waste Management
Plan for remodel and additions over 2,500
square feet,
– Establish recycling protocols on buildings
being demolished.
9
17
2012 International Residential Code
Key discussion topics proposed amendments:
– Fire-sprinklers required in new duplex and new
townhomes, effective July1, 2014,
– Require construction waste and recycling on
remodels and establish recycling policy for
demolitions,
– Elimination of vinyl siding products.
18
2012 International Residential Code
Key discussion topic;
IRC requirement regarding fire-sprinklers in new
single-family detached:
– Not supported at this time,
– New subdivisions:
• Could be designed with fire-sprinklers,
• Requires design review by numerous City
departments.
10
19
Residential Fire-Suppression Systems
IRC P2904
Key discussion topic; Duplex and Townhome,
– P2904 Combination System, $1.50 - $1.75 per
square foot of floor area
– Extension of the home’s cold water system
– Installed by licensed plumbers
– Can not be subject to freezing
– System failure no more or no less than any
cold water system
– Installed so water continually flows.
20
IRC if Not Sprinkled
ICC philosophy is to extinguish fires by suppression.
Without suppression, control fires by fire-resistant
construction.
– Under floor systems to be protected with
sheetrock (additional $1,00/ sq. ft. of ceiling
area)
– Fire rating of walls separating units increases
to two-hour (additional $1,00/ sq. ft. x area of
wall two sides)
11
21
Fire-Sprinklers Sustainability
No loss of life and fewer injuries in fire-sprinkled
dwellings.
Significantly less property damage equals:
– Less burned materials in landfill
– Less resources in equipment and water
– Less carbon emissions
– Less cost to repair
– Less time that dwelling is out of service
22
IRC Sprinkler Adopted
Fire-sprinklers required per IRC in new single-family,
duplex and townhomes:
Boulder County Westminster
Golden Federal Heights
Cherry Hills Village Snowmass Village
12
23
IRC Sprinkler Adopted
Fire-sprinklers required per IRC in new townhomes
Morgan County Greeley
Colorado Springs Castle Pines
Grand County
24
IRC Sprinkler Adopted
IRC sprinkler provisions adopted then rescinded
City and County Denver Centennial
Thornton Lone Tree
Rifle Glenwood Springs
Garfield County Longmont
13
25
2012 International Residential Code
Proposed amendments, non-controversial :
– Basement window well drain systems,
– Egress window sill heights raised to prevent
falling,
– Prescriptive insulation requirements in
electrically heated homes.
26
2012 International Mechanical Code
Proposed amendments, non-controversial :
– Mechanical ductwork to be located inside the
building envelope,
– Clarifications to whole-dwelling unit ventilation
systems,
– Clarification on testing of HVAC equipment.
14
27
2012 International Fuel Gas Code
Proposed amendments, non-controversial :
– Gas cooking appliances in dwellings require
exhaust systems vented to outside,
– Safety shut-off controls on outdoor decorative
appliances.
28
2012 International Energy
Conservation
Energy code basics:
– Improves efficiency by 12%-18% over current
2009 IECC,
– Increases wall insulation R-Values,
– Increases attic insulation R-Values.
15
29
2012 International Energy
Conservation
Proposed amendments, non-controversial :
– Prescriptive insulation requirements in
electrically heated buildings,
– Clarifications on attic insulation at eaves,
– Improving ductwork insulation.
30
Benefits of 2012 I-Codes
• Front Range support for residential fire-sprinkler
systems increased since 2009,
• Energy efficiency improvements over 2009,
• Possibly positive effect on Fort Collins’ ISO rating,
• Improves Green Code Amendments of 2012
– now known as local amendments,
• Aligns “core” codes under single edition year.
16
31
Public Outreach
Water Board August 15, 2013
Natural Resource Advisory August 21, 2013
Commission on Disability August 22, 2013
Affordable Housing Sept. 5, 2013
Energy Board Sept. 5, 2013
Home Builders Assoc. Sept. 11, 2013
Building Review Board Sept. 26, 2013
Planning and Zoning Oct. 4, 2013
Board of Realtors Oct. 8, 2013
Air Quality Oct. 21, 2013
32
Public Comments
Overall support for the five core 2012 International
Codes.
General support to:
– Require fire-sprinklers in new duplexes and
new townhomes effective July 1, 2014.
– Require NFPA 13 fire-suppression system in
new multi-family buildings.
– Disallow use of vinyl siding on new buildings.
17
33
Public Comments Concerns
Some support to:
– Fire-sprinklers in new single-family in new
developments planned and designed around
fire-sprinklers.
Some concern that:
– The proposed energy codes may have
reached a point of diminished returns,
– Cost increases affecting the construction
industry and affordable housing.
34
General Direction Sought
• Does Council have any construction related concerns or
new ideas not proposed to be addressed?
• Does Council wish to adopt the fire sprinkler provisions of
the 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) in its entirety
or by type of structure; duplex and townhomes with
implementation on July 1, 2014?
• Does Council concur with the adopting timeline of January
2014?
18
35
2012 I-Codes Introduction
Thank You