Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 09/27/2011 - TRANSPORTATION UPDATES AND TRANSFORT DISCUSSION ITDATE: September 27, 2011 STAFF: Karen Cumbo, Mark Jackson, Helen Migchelbrink, Marlys Sittner Pre-taped staff presentations: available at fcgov.com/clerk/agendas.php WORK SESSION ITEM FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Transportation Updates and Transfort Discussion Items. Transportation Update Items: • 2011 Transportation Capital Projects Update, including a MAX Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project Update • Keep Fort Collins Great (KFCG) Transportation Project Update Transfort Discussion Items: • Transfort/Dial-A-Ride Service Expansion • Transfort Advertising Policy and Practice EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Planning, Development and Transportation (PDT) staff will present several transportation and transit-related items for consideration and discussion. Part One of the presentation will focus on updates regarding 2011 transportation capital projects, including a status update on the MAX Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project, and Keep Fort Collins Great (KFCG) project/program updates. Part Two will focus on two issues requested by City Council and some southside residents: Expansion of fixed route and Dial-A-Ride service, and potential changes to Transfort’s advertising policies and practices. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED Transportation Update: • Part One updates are informational only; staff is not seeking direction but welcomes feedback. September 27, 2011 Page 2 Direction sought regarding Transfort: Transfort/Dial-A-Ride Service Expansion: 1. Staff seeks direction in addressing citizen requests for expanded transit service in southeast Fort Collins, specifically adding fixed route bus service and complementary paratransit service on Lemay south of Harmony. Transfort Advertising Policy: 1. Should the City execute a new bus interior/exterior advertising contract on September 30, 2011? 2. Should the City maintain its current bus bench and shelter advertising contract with Next Media? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION PART ONE:TRANSPORTATION UPDATES A. 2011 Transportation Capital Projects Update Transportation capital construction projects address needed safety and capacity improvements to the City’s roads, bridges, sidewalks and intersections. These improvements benefit all users of the system, including: • Motorists (road and intersection improvements, traffic signals, signs and striping) • Pedestrians (intersection safety improvements, new sidewalks, ramps and signals) • Bicyclists (bike lanes, improved road markings) Several transportation capital projects are underway in 2011, including: • Bridges - The City’s two highest priority bridge projects, Laporte and Whitcomb, and South Shield bridge, just south of Rolland Moore Park, will go under construction in fall 2011. • Intersections - Two intersection improvement projects are currently out for bid to be constructed later this fall. The intersections of Harmony and Lemay, and Lemay and Drake, will be improved. The projects will add turn lane improvements at these high traffic locations, improving safety and mobility. To obtain the best pricing and efficiency, these projects have been combined into a single bid package. • I-25 Interchange at SH-392 (Carpenter Road) - The reconstruction of the I-25 interchange at SH-392 (Carpenter Road) has begun. This is a collaborative regional effort with the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and the Town of Windsor. $22.5 million in federal and state funds were awarded by CDOT to construct the project. Windsor and Fort Collins are contributing to the $5 million local share. All three agencies have worked closely together since 2008 on the planning, design, and financing to make this project become reality. This is a key gateway project for both Fort Collins and Windsor, and September 27, 2011 Page 3 addresses safety and mobility issues. The interchange is aging and can no longer adequately handle regional traffic volumes experienced now and forecast in the future. • North College Improvements Project – This project will make significant drainage, pedestrian, bicycle, roadway, and safety improvements on this important northern Fort Collins gateway. The project will also improve the streetscape and parkway along North College. The current project budget allows for improvements from Vine Drive north to Hemlock, with some safety improvements at College and Conifer. • Linden Streetscape Project – This project is constructing improvements along Linden Street from Jefferson Street to the Poudre River. It is funded primarily through state and federal grants, BOB funds, and local Downtown Development Authority contributions. This project will make several upgrades to the utility system, and will add pedestrian facilities, bike lanes, and significant streetscape improvements. • MAX Bus Rapid Transit Project - Work is proceeding on the MAX Project, including the finalization of design, station refinement, and preliminary construction activities. Construction on the preliminary phase began in September 2011 to install underground communication conduits related to the two-way conversion of Mason Street. Completion of final Engineering design drawings and complete bid documents is anticipated by the end of October 2011. Efforts continue to refine the incorporation of artistic elements at the stations. Staff will be seeking Council input on artwork to be ultimately included. Major construction is scheduled to begin in early 2012, with operations beginning in spring 2014. A full project schedule is included in Attachment 1. Attachment 2 includes recent renderings of the South Transit Center and BRT Station designs. The South Transit Center site will provide a park and ride and ample bicycle parking, and includes nine bus bays for both MAX and the various Transfort cross-town routes. The building will house Transfort offices, public restrooms, retail space, and break room facilities for the bus drivers. The Transfort Maintenance Facility Expansion will provide compressed natural gas (CNG) fueling facilities to serve the new MAX routes, as well as other CNG Transfort fleet vehicles. Please see Attachment 3 for a more detailed description of each project listed above. Attachment 4 shows the relative location of each project. B. Keep Fort Collins Great (KFCG) Transportation Project and Program Update The passage of the Keep Fort Collins Great (KFCG) ballot item in November 2010 significantly and positively changed the City’s ability to address long standing transportation maintenance and capital project needs. It also allowed for the retention of several ongoing programs and services that were scheduled to be eliminated due to budget restrictions. Finally, KFCG funds enabled key transportation planning projects previously stalled due to budget restrictions to move forward and proactively identify and address issues and opportunities. Without the addition of over $9.3 million KFCG dollars, many important transportation, transit and infrastructure needs would go unaddressed. September 27, 2011 Page 4 Key 2011 KFCG transportation expenditures include: Street Maintenance ($6.17 million budgeted; $5.15 million spent or encumbered through August) 2011 Street Maintenance Projects Using KFCG Funds: Completed • Resurfacing of Conifer, from College to Lemay (Collector) • Resurfacing of East Horsetooth, College to Timberline (Arterial) • Slurry seal Meadowlark Neighborhood, south of West Swallow (Residential) In Progress • Resurfacing of West Drake, from Meadowlark to railroad tracks (Arterial) • Resurfacing of Riverside Drive, from Prospect to Lemay (Arterial) • Resurfacing of Boardwalk, from Harmony to Landings (Minor Arterial) • Resurfacing of Valley Forge, from Taft to Hampshire (Collector) • Hot applied chip overlay of Vine, from Lemay to Interstate 25 (Arterial) Scheduled • Parkwood East area slurry seal (Residential) These projects represent an additional 36 lane miles of improved roads in Fort Collins that would not have been possible without KFCG funding. Not only does the additional funding help the City catch up on much-needed repairs that have been postponed over the past five years, it also allows the overall condition of the City’s road investment to maintain a good Level of Service (LOS) rating. Pre-KFCG funding, the Streets Department was only able to maintain approximately 44 lane miles each year. The Streets Department will maintain approximately 80 lane miles of road in 2011. Combined with other street maintenance funding sources, over $13 million is being invested in Fort Collins’ transportation infrastructure maintenance in 2011. KFCG funds will be used for 45% of all of the City’s street maintenance projects in 2011. Capital Projects: • South Shields Street Bridge over Larimer Canal No. 2 ($1.5 million budgeted; $87,500 spent through August) Construction slated for fall 2011. • Laporte-Whitcomb Bridge Replacement (budgeted $670,000 in 2012) Project construction accelerated to 2011 due to receipt of grant funds. • Transportation Capital and Master Plan implementation ($345,000 budgeted in 2011) This fund allows several small unfunded capital projects to proceed over the next two years, including: N Skyway transit stop and adjoining sidewalk improvements N Drake–Redwing pedestrian traffic signal improvements September 27, 2011 Page 5 N Transfort South Transfer Center bus pad concrete improvements N North College improvements (Phase III design) N Mason Trail-Troutman bike-pedestrian underpass supplemental N Miscellaneous pedestrian sidewalk and ramp repairs Other KFCG transportation projects and programs underway or scheduled include: Restored Services: • Engineering surveying services • Traffic Operations Traffic Signal Technician • Streets and Traffic Operations capital equipment replacement • Traffic sign replacement program • Transfort/Dial-A-Ride night service • Transfort Saturday service • Transfort Operations-marketing Parking Services: • Old Town Parking Garage maintenance • Downtown handicap parking spaces • Downtown parking study Transportation Planning: • Harmony Road Enhanced Travel Corridor Plan • Bicycle Safety and Education Plan implementation • City Bicycle Coordinator/FC Bikes program (2012 funds) • Railroad Quiet Zone Study, Phase II Street Oversizing Capital Expansion Fee Program: • These funds will be used to help cover the City’s portion of the arterial and collector roadways built as part of developments. Please see Attachment 5 for a more detailed description of each project listed above. Attachment 6 describes all 2011 KFCG transportation projects and monies expended to date. September 27, 2011 Page 6 PART TWO: TRANSFORT DISCUSSION ITEMS A. TRANSFORT SERVICE EXPANSION DISCUSSION Executive Summary Over the past year, a group of citizens from southeast Fort Collins has asked the City to increase fixed route transit and complementary paratransit services in southeast Fort Collins, specifically south of Harmony Road on Lemay Avenue to Trilby Road. Staff responded to City management and to citizens in regards to what the service would look like and what the cost would be to provide fixed route and complementary paratransit service to the area requested. Councilmembers have also asked for additional information regarding expenses and general policy regarding Transfort service. These questions were addressed in a white paper sent to City Council on August 16, 2011, and are also addressed in this Agenda Item Summary. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED • Staff seeks direction in addressing a citizen request for expanded transit service in southeast Fort Collins, south of Harmony Road. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Existing City policy states that Transfort paratransit service levels will comply as mandated by the Federal Transit Administration and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). This policy direction was established by City Council in 2006, and implemented in January 2007. In 2007, City Council made two exceptions to the minimum service levels. The following exceptions were established: 1. Paratransit service hours exceed fixed route service hours. Whereas fixed route service generally ends at approximately 7:00 PM, paratransit service continues until 11:00 PM. 2. Paratransit passengers who were using the Dial-A-Ride service prior to the Council discussion to reduce the service (October 2006) were grandfathered into the reduced service area. This exception impacted 85 people who were using Dial-A-Ride, lived outside of the new, smaller service area, and who were eligible for paratransit services. After recertification, only 55 people were grandfathered into the service area and this number is now 50. City Council has continued the exceptions by funding the associated “offers” through the Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO) process. The budget for these exceptions is: 1. Extended Service hours for 2011/2012 - $44,000/$45,500 2. Grandfathered clients into service area for 2011/2012 - $81,000/$83,500. September 27, 2011 Page 7 HISTORY Establishment of Paratransit Dial-A-Ride Service in Fort Collins On August 18, 1992, City Council adopted Resolution 1992-130, the City’s Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Transit/Paratransit Services, as required by the Federal Transit Administration. Resolution 1994-191 expanded the City’s paratransit eligibility definition to include non-disabled individuals who are 60 years of age and older. 2002 Paratransit Eligibility Study In 2002, the City conducted a paratransit eligibility study. The growing demand for Dial-A-Ride service was exceeding the City’s service resources and there was growing concern as to the ability to continue meeting all Americans with Disabilities Act requirements. The study identified the areas in which the City met or exceeded the ADA-mandated level of paratransit service, and concluded that the City’s Dial-A-Ride service met or exceeded all federally mandated service requirements for Americans with Disabilities Act. Examples of how Fort Collins Dial-A-Ride service exceeded ADA-mandated levels of service are shown below in Table 1. Table 1 2002 ADA REQUIREMENT CITY SERVICE Eligibility Persons with a disability that prevents them from using fixed route bus service Persons with a disability; Persons age 60 or older Service Area 3/4 mile radius of all fixed routes City’s Growth Management Area Fares No higher than twice the standard fixed route fare Ranged from free to twice the standard fixed route fare, based on income Hours of Service Equal to fixed route, 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. 5:30 a.m. - 2:00 a.m. Areas of concerns noted by the study included: • Service demands were close to requiring trip denials, which is in violation of Americans with Disabilities Act. If an entity exceeds ADA required service, service cannot be denied to Americans with Disabilities Act protected individuals. The only way to eliminate this potential compliance issue was to add more Dial-A-Ride vehicles and resources or limit the service that exceeded Americans with Disabilities Act. • The increasing elderly population would continue to place an increased demand on the limited resources for the Dial-A-Ride service. • Failure to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act could result in civil rights litigation against the City. September 27, 2011 Page 8 The 2002 study provided a peer system comparison of paratransit eligibility, finding that only Greeley and Loveland offered paratransit eligibility to non-disabled persons age 60 and older. Also outside of the norm, Fort Collins, Loveland, and Lawrence, Kansas were the only paratransit service providers to offer service outside of the Americans with Disabilities Act-mandated service area (3/4 mile radius of all fixed routes). The study identified numerous options for service modifications to align the paratransit eligibility to national and regional peers, to reduce the Dial-A-Ride operating expenses, and to eliminate the likelihood of an Americans with Disabilities Act violation. At the completion of the study, Council direction included: • There should be no changes to the eligibility criteria for Dial-A-Ride • There should be no changes to the service area for Dial-A-Ride • Any surplus realized from any fare increase should be applied to operating deficiencies for Dial-A-Ride. 2006 Dial-A-Ride Analysis In 2006, staff provided updated Dial-A-Ride ridership and financial reports to the City Manager with the recommendation to reduce the Dial-A-Ride service levels to the Americans with Disabilities Act minimum and to increase the fixed route service to cover East Prospect, Timberline, and East Harmony. As projected in the earlier study, by 2003, Dial-A-Ride’s ridership demand exceeded the budgeted ridership maximum and trips were denied. Concerned about the ramification of trip denials and potential violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, staff utilized fixed route resources to meet the Dial-A-Ride demand. With the City Council adoption of the Transfort Strategic Plan in 2002, the Council’s stated focus was on providing more cost-effective and productive public service; however, the less productive Dial-A-Ride service consumed 43% of the department’s operating budget in 2005, which was an all-time high. The 2005 Dial-A-Ride cost per one-way trip was $22.26; there were 87,724 trips and an increasing demand. The City Manager supported staff’s recommendation and brought the issue to a City Council work session on September 26, 2006. The 2006 presentation included the following major points: • Americans with Disabilities Act requires entities providing fixed route bus service to provide a complementary transportation service for people with disabilities that prevent their access to the fixed route service; standards for complementary service include Eligibility, Service Area, Service Hours, and Fares. • The City of Fort Collins exceeded the requirements of Americans with Disabilities Act requirement in all four areas. (See Table 2.) September 27, 2011 Page 9 • The City of Fort Collins exceeded Americans with Disabilities Act while our peers did not. In fact, only Greeley and Loveland provided similar service and they based their service levels on Fort Collins. In spite of that, Greeley and Loveland did not provide extended service hours. • Paratransit ridership was increasing each year and the budget gap was growing each year. • Operating efficiencies reduced the cost per trip between 2003 and 2006; however, increasing service demand drove the overall operating costs to exceed the budget. • To meet the increasing demand, financial resources were being reallocated from fixed route service to Dial-A-Ride. • Staff projected that Dial-A-Ride ridership would grow by 6% per year; reaching 118,000 trips and a budget of $3.0 million by 2010. Table 2 Exceeds ADA - 2006 Peer Comparison 2006 Fort Collins Loveland Greeley Colorado Springs Denver/ Boulder Pueblo Grand Junction Service Area Yes - GMA Yes, City Limits Yes, City Limits No No No No Eligibility Yes - 60+ Yes - 60+ Yes - 60+ No No No No Fares Yes - Income based Yes - Income based No No No No No Services Days/Hours Yes - Night service No No No No No No In 2006, Council indicated a general sentiment to reduce the paratransit service levels to the Americans with Disabilities Act requirements. It was viewed as the fiscally responsible action. There was also a general opinion that adding fixed route services to the eastern areas of the city would benefit more citizens. Additionally, Council discussed that, by adding fixed route to Harmony and Timberline, paratransit service would also be required to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act complementary service area requirement. In January 2007, Transfort added Route 16, 17 and 18. (See Attachment 7 for a map of the 2007 additional fixed route service with new ADA-mandated paratransit service area.) Paratransit was reduced to the ADA requirements and the service area became 3/4 mile radius of all fixed route bus service, including the three new routes. UPDATE OF POLICY IMPACTS Transfort staff’s analysis of the impacts of the 2006 DAR policy change indicates the following results (2006-2010) (Figure 2): September 27, 2011 Page 10 • Senior and disabled public transit ridership (fixed route and paratransit) increased 22.1%; an average of 5.5% per year. • Mode split (fixed route/paratransit) in 2010 was 89/11 compared to 72/28 in 2006; Figure 2 • Based on the 2010 costs per trip (Fixed Route at $1.88 and Paratransit at 28.43), the combined average net cost to the City for the senior and disabled trips was $4.76, compared to $7.13 in 2006 (Figure 3). Figure 3. September 27, 2011 Page 11 In summary, Transfort is providing more rides to seniors and people with disabilities (22.1% increase over four years); and is saving a significant amount of money by providing more of the trips on fixed route (cumulative estimate is nearly five million dollars during the four years since the policy change). OPTIONS There are several current requests that City Council fund fixed route bus service and the associated complementary paratransit on Lemay Avenue south of Harmony to Trilby. No surplus funds are available in either the Transportation Fund or Transit Fund at this time to cover the costs of additional service. OPTION 1: As requested, provide fixed route bus service on South Lemay, south of Harmony to Trilby and the ADA-required complementary paratransit service. The service would be incorporated with existing service on North Lemay and would be provided every 60 minutes from approximately 6:30 AM - 6:30 PM. The fixed route service costs would be approximately $235,000 per year and the complementary paratransit provided 3/4 mile radius of Lemay would cost approximately $85,000 per year. Attachment 8 shows the additional route and paratransit service area extension. PROS: This option meets the service request from the citizens, is similar to service improvements identified within the 2009 Council-adopted Transfort Strategic Plan (Phase 2), and is consistent with current Dial-A-Ride adopted policy. CONS: Numerous service improvements in Phase 1 of the adopted Transfort Strategic Plan are not yet funded or operational. Examples of unfunded services in Phase 1 include additional service and re-alignment of existing routes along Elizabeth, University, Horsetooth, and Drake to improve connections to MAX; increased frequency on routes serving CSU, extension of service hours on select routes to provide early evening service, and a Downtown Circular route. Council may be asked how transit service improvements are prioritized. OPTION 2: Add the paratransit service without the fixed route bus service for an approximate cost of $85,000 per year. PROS: This option may appease the citizen request, as most of their concern is about the disabled/elderly transportation needs; and it is less costly than adding fixed route and paratransit. CONS: This option is not consistent with the City’s current Dial-A-Ride policy, and would require an exception or amendment to the policy to extend paratransit outside of the 3/4 mile radius of a fixed route. It is also important to note that this option may not meet the citizens’ request for service for elderly, non-disabled residents unless another exception is implemented to expand the eligibility requirement in this area only to senior, non-disabled passengers. These types of exceptions may invite additional exception requests in other unserved or underserved areas of the city. Such additional exceptions would require additional funding. September 27, 2011 Page 12 OPTION 3: Direct staff to write a BFO offer for this service (fixed route and complementary paratransit on South Lemay from Harmony to Trilby) and have the offer compete in the BFO budget process for funding in 2013/2014. PROS: Maintains the adopted budgeting process for funding additional city services. Does not require explanation on why one area of the city was allowed a policy exception. This option also permits staff to properly assess new census data regarding demographic changes in the City. CONS: Does not meet the citizens’ requests for immediate addition of transit and paratransit to the southeast area of Fort Collins; specifically to the area of South Lemay, south of Harmony to Trilby Road. September 27, 2011 Page 13 B. TRANSFORT ADVERTISING POLICY AND PRACTICE Executive Summary Currently, the City has two contracts with Next Media: one for advertising on bus benches and shelters and the second for advertising on buses (interior and exterior space). The second contract will expire on September 30, 2011. This contract has been re-bid and has a contract pending with Street Media. While the advertising program was established to address serious budget concerns in Fort Collins, it is typical of programs in most other public transit agencies. In addition, both the contracts and City Code regulate the program and establish performance standards. The financial impacts to Transfort if both the advertising contracts were terminated are as follows: • Revenue lost if advertising contracts are eliminated is estimated at $224,000 annually. Benches and shelters average $123,000 and bus advertising is guaranteed at $101,000. • Loss of sales tax revenue is estimated at $30,000. • One-time capital expense to purchase existing bus shelters and benches from current contractor estimated at $120,000. • New capital, operating and maintenance expenses estimated at $300,000 annually, all of which are currently provided by the contractor (see Scope Highlights in Background information below) . GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Should the City execute a new bus interior/exterior advertising contract on September 30, 2011? 2. Should the City maintain its current bus bench and shelter advertising contract with Next Media? BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Currently the City has two contracts with Next Media; one for advertising on bus benches and shelters, and the second for advertising on buses (interior and exterior space). The second contract will expire on September 30, 2011. Shelter and Bench Contract Term: The City entered into the contract with Outdoor Promotions on December 31, 2001. It is a 20 year term; expiring December 31, 2021. In 2007, NextMedia purchased Outdoor Promotions and, in connection with the assignment of the contract to NextMedia, the contract was amended. The amendment did not modify the term of the contract. The contract features discussed below are those of the contract as amended. September 27, 2011 Page 14 The Scope Highlights include: • Contractor furnishes, installs, repairs, and maintains all shelters, bus pads, and benches at all bus stops identified by the City of Fort Collins. • Contractor retains ownership throughout the term of the agreement; ownership transfers to the City at the end of the term. • In the event the contract is terminated prior to full term, the City shall have the option to purchase benches and shelters. • Maintenance is the responsibility of the Contractor; and specified conditions include clean, sanitary, graffiti-free, and reasonably litter-free. • Contractor is responsible for repair and replacement of damaged or defaced shelters or benches or individual parts thereof within no more than five days. • Contractor must provide General Liability insurance minimum of $1.0 million. • Contractor bears all costs related to this agreement. Revenue: • From the start of the contract through year five, City of Fort Collins received 15% of gross advertising revenue. • At the start of contract year six, the City’s revenue increased to twenty percent (20%) of gross revenue. • Revenue received in 2010 was $127,428; average of last four years is $123,000. Guaranteed minimum is $100 per advertising bench and $762 per advertising shelter. Based on the existing inventory (161 benches & 122 shelters) the 2010 revenue was $18,364 more than the guaranteed minimum of $109,964. The City is also provided one bench per every ten benches installed and one shelter per every ten shelters. The benches and shelters provided to the City may be placed in areas where advertising is not permitted. Early Termination: The City may terminate the contract “for any reason whatsoever” to discontinue using the City bus benches and shelters for paid advertising for a period of at least one year, by providing sixty days written notice and providing a payment to the Contractor sufficient to purchase all shelters and benches. (While the contract Scope of Service states that if the contract is terminated prior to the full term, the City shall have the option to purchase any shelters or benches, the early termination language specifies that if the City terminates the agreement, they can do so by purchasing the shelters and benches.) The contract specifies the shelters are $10,000 each and the benches are $1,000; less fourteen and three tenths percent (14.3%) depreciation per year from the installation date of a new shelter or bench. Based on the current inventory, the payment to the Contractor would be approximately $120,000. September 27, 2011 Page 15 Bus Interior and Exterior Contract Term: The City entered into the contract with Outdoor Promotions on September 1, 2001. The contract term was five years (which expired on September 1, 2006), with an extension option for another five-year term. The option was exercised and the contract expires on September 30, 2011. This contract was also transferred to Next Media in 2007. The City recently advertised a request for proposal for advertising on the exterior and interior of buses and received three proposals. Street Media Group, LLC was notified by City staff that its proposal was selected; however, the contract has not been signed. Scope Highlights: • The proposal is based on 31 buses within the Transfort fleet, and does not include the six anticipated MAX buses. • Contractor must provide a General Liability insurance minimum of $500,000. • Contractor bears all associated costs. Revenue: The current contract (expiring on September 30, 2011) provides fifty-one percent (51%) of all gross revenue, with a guaranteed minimum of $50,000 per year. The 2010 revenue from the bus advertising contract was $76,124; the average annual revenue over the last four years was $70,000. The Street Media proposal includes a compensation plan that provides the City fifty-six percent (56%) of gross revenue, with a guaranteed minimum of $101,000 annually. Under the proposal, the City will also receive twelve exterior and six interior signs to advertise Transfort. Any unsold spaces are also available for Transfort advertising until the space is sold and generating revenue. Early Termination: Within the current Next Media contract, the City may terminate the contract with sixty (60) days written notice; however during the sixty (60) day period, the Contractor is entitled to retain ninety percent (90%) of the revenue generated from advertising sold during the sixty (60) days just prior to the termination date. The scope of the request for proposals and the accepted proposal for the bus advertising are silent on early termination; however, in the Agreement used for this Contract, the City may terminate this Agreement at any time without cause by providing written notice of termination to the Service Provider. Such notice shall be delivered at least fifteen (15) days prior to the termination. In the event the Next Media contract expires on September 30, 2011 and a new agreement is not in place with Street Media, all advertisements will be removed from the buses. Unlike the shelter and bench contract, the City is not liable for any “buy-out” expenses in the event of an early termination on the bus advertising. September 27, 2011 Page 16 Basis of the Advertising Program While the advertising program was established to address serious budget concerns in Fort Collins, it is typical of programs in most other public transit agencies. In addition, both the contracts and City Code regulate the program and establish performance standards. Advertising is limited to legitimate commercial transactions and must maintain a neutral position on political, religious, and ideological matters. The City reserves the right to approve or disapprove all advertising content, copy, design, and colors to be displayed. The advertising content is also limited to advertising that proposes a legitimate commercial transaction and that will promote healthful, family-oriented products and services appropriate for citizens of all ages. The Contractor shall be solely and completely responsible for the content of all bus advertisements and is prohibited from displaying noncommercial advertising, with the exception of ads placed by Transfort, or the following types of commercial advertising: 1. Advertising that primarily conveys a political, religious, ideological or other non- commercial message 2. Advertising of alcohol or tobacco products 3. Advertising that promotes illegal activities or transactions 4. Advertising that is misleading or deceptive, or that constitutes a public nuisance 5. Advertising of products or services available to adults only by law 6. Advertising of any product or service primarily related to sexual or violent activities or practices, or advertising of any product or service in a manner that is sexually suggestive or that displays or suggests violence or is inappropriate for minors; and 7. Any advertising reasonably determined to be inconsistent with the above-stated objectives of the advertising program. Bus advertisement is also governed by the City’s Sign Code, which, among other things, limits bus shelters displaying advertising to be located within three hundred (300) feet of zoned or existing commercial, retail or industrial uses or along an arterial provided that no residential uses front on the arterial, again within three hundred (300) feet of the shelter. Other Cost Impacts In the event of advertising termination, capital and associated maintenance activities that have been performed by the contractors would have to be assumed by the City. Although new development is required to add transit amenities, there will be other ongoing capital expenses related to new or replacement amenities such as concrete pads, bus shelters, and benches. Maintenance of the bus stops could be performed through contracting to private business, contracting with other City departments (Streets or Parks), or performed by adding staff to the Transfort department. Transfort currently does not have the maintenance service vehicles to perform this work, so it may be less cost effective to add staff to the Transfort department. It is estimated that ongoing maintenance activities would cost approximately $100,000 annually. September 27, 2011 Page 17 Although Transfort has a maintenance technician, his duties do not include maintenance of the 122 bus stops with shelters; nor do they include maintenance at the 161 bus stops with advertising benches. The maintenance technician maintains two of the three Transfort facilities and associated grounds, and provides maintenance and repair at the remaining 100 bus stops with limited or no passenger amenities. Managing tasks associated with the bus shelters and benches include activities such as citizen complaint and response, arranging sub-contractors for maintenance and repairs, and other related activities would require additional staff time and is estimated at .5 to 1.0 FTE, for another estimated $50,000. In addition, there would be a loss of some sales tax revenue. Summary • Revenue lost if advertising contracts are eliminated is estimated at $224,000 annually. Benches and shelters average $123,000 and Bus Advertising is guaranteed at $101,000. • Loss of Sales Tax revenue is estimated at $30,000. • One-time capital expense to purchase existing bus shelters and benches from current contractor estimated at $120,000. • New capital, operating and maintenance expenses estimated at $300,000 annually. Please see Attachment 9 for a chart summarizing the financial impacts of transit advertising. ATTACHMENTS Transportation Update Attachments 1. MAX BRT Timeline 2. Recent renderings – South Transit Center, MAX BRT Station Design 3. Annotated 2011 Capital Project List 4. Location map – 2011 Capital Projects 5. Annotated KFCG Transportation Project List 6. YTD KFCG Transportation Project List – Budget vs. Expenditure Transfort Attachments 7. 2007 Additional Fixed Route service with new ADA-mandated Paratransit Service Area 8. Transfort/Dial-A-Ride Service Area Showing potential service expansion 9. Financial Matrix of Transfort Advertising Contracts 10. Powerpoint presentation for Transportation Update 11. Powerpoint presentation for Keep Fort Collins Great Transportation Projects 12. Powerpoint presentation for Transfort Attachment 1 MAX Project: South Transit Center Attachment 2 Attachment 2 MAX Project: Transfort Maintenance Facility Expansion Attachment 3 Annotated 2011 Transportation Capital Project List - 1 - LAPORTE AND WHITCOMB BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Funding Source: Keep Fort Collins Great, State Bridge Replacement Funds Estimated Project Budget: $1.27 M Project Status: Ready for Bid Estimated Construction Date: Fall 2011 ƒ The goal of the project is to replace the worst rated, structurally deficient bridge in the City with a new bridge that meets the current standards. ƒ The new bridge will be built to last for at least 75 years. ƒ The project scope will include the replacement of concrete pavement at the intersection of Laporte and Whitcomb. SOUTH SHIELDS STREET BRIDGE OVER LARIMER CANAL NO. 2 Funding Source: Keep Fort Collins Great, State Bridge Replacement Funds Estimated Project Budget: $1.5 M Project Status: Ready for Bid Estimated Construction Date: Fall 2011 ƒ This is the second worst rated, structurally deficient bridge in the City. ƒ The new replacement bridge will be similar in size as the existing bridge. ƒ The bike and pedestrian facilities will be augmented with this project. ƒ Urban design elements have been incorporated into the design of this bridge. DRAKE AND LEMAY INTERSECTION TURN LANE Funding Source: Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Grant, City of Fort Collins BOB Intersection Fund Estimated Project Budget: $325,000 Status: Out to Bid ƒ The goal of this project is to relieve traffic congestion and vehicle wait time by constructing a right turn lane from westbound Drake to northbound Lemay. ƒ The reduced vehicle wait time will lead to a measurable improvement in air quality by reducing carbon emissions. ƒ Two right-of-way (ROW) acquisitions were required at the northeast corner of the intersection. The City will take possession of the ROW on or before September 26, 2011. ƒ The design calls for construction of the right turn lane and replacement of the existing bike lane and sidewalk. ƒ The northeast corner of the intersection is heavily landscaped. The construction will require relocating six to eight large pine trees on-site along with the replacement of bushes and shrubs. ƒ Continued public outreach has included three meetings with the Parkwood Homeowners Board, the latest of which occurred on September 6. Attachment 3 Annotated 2011 Transportation Capital Project List - 2 - HARMONY AND LEMAY INTERSECTION TURN LANE Funding Source: Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Grant, City of Fort Collins BOB Intersection Fund Estimated Project Budget: $325,000 Status: Out for Bid ƒ The goal of this project is to relieve traffic congestion and vehicle wait time by constructing a second left turn lane from westbound Harmony to southbound Lemay. ƒ The reduced vehicle wait time will lead to a measurable improvement in air quality by reducing carbon emissions. ƒ The design calls for the construction of a raised median on Harmony Road, east of the intersection, so that a new left turn lane can fit in south of the existing left turn lane. ƒ The median will be landscaped as part of the project. I 25 SH 392 INTERCHANGE CONSTRUCTION Funding Source: CDOT, FHWA, Town of Windsor, Fort Collins Estimated Construction Budget: $25 million Status: Under Construction ƒ The goal of this project is to replace the failing interchange located at Interstate 25 and State Highway 392. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), the North Front Range MPO, the Town of Windsor and the City of Fort Collins have collaborated on the planning, design and funding of this project. ƒ The Fort Collins City Council and the Windsor Town Board approved Intergovernmental Agreements between the City of Fort Collins, Town of Windsor and CDOT defining construction, maintenance and ownership of the interchange and Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Fort Collins and the Town of Windsor that defines the process for review of development and redevelopment proposals, and identifies cost sharing and reimbursement through development impact fees. ƒ The project was awarded to Edward Kraemer & Sons Construction. ƒ A groundbreaking ceremony was held August 19, 2011. NORTH COLLEGE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS – VINE TO CONIFER Funding Source: Building on Basics Funds, CDOT Funds, Truck Route Funds, and URA Funds Estimated Project Budget: $11,190,000 Status: Out to Bid ƒ The North College Improvements project will make significant drainage, pedestrian, bicycle, roadway, and safety improvements on this important northern Fort Collins gateway. The project will also improve the streetscape and parkway along North College. The current project budget allows for improvements from Vine Drive north to Hemlock, with some safety improvements at College and Conifer. ƒ Utility relocation work will commence in mid-September. This work aims to relocate private utilities in conflict with the planned project improvements. Attachment 3 Annotated 2011 Transportation Capital Project List - 3 - ƒ Extensive public outreach, including coordination with the North Fort Collins Business Association, impacted property owners and other interested groups, will continue throughout the duration of the project. ƒ Additional project information is available to the public at http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/ncollege.php. LINDEN STREET STREETSCAPE PROJECT Funding sources: Building on Basics (BOB) – Pedestrian Plan, Transportation Enhancement Federal Funds, Downtown Development Authority, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Funds, and City of Fort Collins Utilities Estimated Project Budget: $3 million Status: Under Construction ƒ The Linden Streetscape project is constructing improvements along Linden Street from Jefferson Street to the Poudre River. This project will make several upgrades to the utility system, and will add pedestrian facilities, bike lanes, and significant streetscape improvements. ƒ Construction of the underground utility improvements has been completed. ƒ The City is pursuing an agreement through the Public Utilities Commission for a public railroad crossing to provide access to the El Burrito restaurant. ƒ Upon completion at the end of 2011, Linden will be repaved from Jefferson to Vine Dr., streetscape improvements will be in place, and the bridge over the Poudre River will be repaired and brought into compliance with City and Federal standards. MAX BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT Funding Source: FTA 80%, Local Match 20% (CDOT SB-1 and FASTER, City, Downtown Development Authority, BOB, BCC and 292 Funds) Estimate Project Budget: $87 M Status: On Budget, On Schedule Work is proceeding on the MAX Project including the finalization of design, station refinement, and preliminary construction activities. Major milestones achieved this year include: ƒ Execution of the agreement with the Burlington Northern Sante Fe (BNSF) railroad to allow MAX construction and operations. ƒ Submittal of the Project Construction Grant Agreement (PCGA) to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). FTA has indicated a fully executed PCGA will be completed in February 2012. ƒ Construction on the preliminary phase began in September 2011 to install underground communication conduits related to the two-way conversion of Mason St. ƒ Completion of final Engineering design drawings and complete bid documents are anticipated by the end of October 2011. Efforts continue to refine the incorporation of artistic elements at the stations. Staff will be seeking Council input on artwork to be ultimately included. The art can be refined over the next several months since it is not part of the critical path to completing the stations. Attachment 3 Annotated 2011 Transportation Capital Project List - 4 - For the past year, City staff has been working with staff at the Federal Transit Agency (FTA) to finalize the Project Construction Grant Agreement (PCGA). The PCGA is the instrument by which the City will receive federal funding to construct the MAX Project. All of the submittals to the FTA were delivered on the timeline required by them, including the most important piece which was the executed agreement with the Burlington Northern Sante Fe Railroad (BNSF) to allow the City to construct and operate MAX on BNSF right of way. This document was executed on March 26, 2011 and delivered to the FTA on March 27th. The draft PCGA was delivered to FTA in May for their review. For the past year, the FTA has indicated the PCGA would be ready for execution in October, 2011.As a result of their review, the FTA made the following recommended changes to the project: 1. Move the award of the PCGA to February 2012 (previously projected award date was October 2011). 2. Augment the total project funding with an additional $5 Million. This brings the total project cost to $87 Million. The biggest impact this has to the MAX Project is that service operations will now begin in May of 2014. Our previous schedule indicated a December of 2013 opening date, but the FTA has moved this out by four months. 2011 Transportation Capital Projects ROAD IMPROVEMENTS BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS I-25 INTERCHANGE CONSTRUCTION INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS MAX Project HWY 287 TAFT HILL COLLEGE LEMAY TIMBERLINE MULBERRY PROSPECT DRAKE HORSETOOTH HARMONY HWY 392 25 SHIELDS LINDEN LAPORTE MAX Project Attachment 4 Attachment 5 Planning, Development & Transportation KFCG Update - Fall 2011 1 STREET MAINTENANCE Offer 127.22 Pavement Management Program 2011 Original Budget: $6,171,000 Expenses and/ or Encumbrances through August: $5,150,281 2011 Street Maintenance Project using KFCG funds: Completed • Resurfacing of Conifer from College to Lemay • Resurfacing of E Horsetooth College to Timberline • Slurry Seal Meadowlark Neighborhood south of W Swallow In Progress • Resurfacing of W Drake from Meadowlark to railroad tracks • Resurfacing of Riverside Dr from Prospect to Lemay • Resurfacing of Boardwalk from Harmony to Landings • Resurfacing of Valley Forge from Taft to Hampshire • Hot Applied Chip Overlay of Vine from Lemay to Interstate 25 Scheduled • Parkwood East area Slurry Seal 2012 Original Budget: $6,349,959 (2012 program planning underway) CAPITAL PROJECTS: Offer 114.3 KFCG - Transportation Capital and Master Plan Implementation 2011 Original Budget: $345,031 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through April: $0 2012 Original Budget: $350,000 Staff has identified several recommended small capital projects for 2011-2012, including: • Skyway Transit Stop and Adjoining Sidewalk Improvements 2011: $5,000 2012: $150,000 • Drake-Redwing Pedestrian Traffic Signal Improvements 2011: $14,000 • Transfort South Transfer Center Bus Pad Concrete Improvements 2011: $5,000 • TIGER III Grant Application (Drake – BNSF RR Grade Separation) 2011: $10,000 • North College Improvements, Phase III (Conifer to Willow Design) 2011: $226,000 Attachment 5 Planning, Development & Transportation KFCG Update - Fall 2011 2 • Mason Trail – Troutman Bike-Pedestrian Underpass Supplemental 2011: $70,000 • Miscellaneous Pedestrian Sidewalk and Ramp Repairs 2011:$15,031 • TBD 2012: $198,000 TOTALS 2011: $345,031 2012: $350,000 Offer 146.5 KFCG - Street Oversizing Capital Expansion Fee Program 2011 Original Budget: $300,000 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through April: $0 2012 Original Budget: $400,000 These funds will be used to cover the City’s portion of the arterial and collector roadways built as part of developments. No construction has occurred in the first quarter of 2011 so no funds have been spent. Approximately $150,000 will be spent in 2011 on replacing traffic signals on arterial streets. The balance will be used in 2012 for construction of Turnberry Road, done in conjunction with the developer’s contribution. Offer 146.14 KFCG - South Shields Street Bridge Over Larimer Canal No. 2 2011 Original Budget: $1,500,000 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through April: $87,560 2012 Original Budget: $400,000 Expenditures to date have been for the design of the Shields bridge. Construction is slated for Fall 2011. In December, 2010, The City of Fort Collins was awarded Federal grant funding to cover 80% of the cost of replacing two bridges: the Shields bridge near Rolland Moore and the Laporte-Whitcomb bridge . Shields bridge was scheduled to be funded with 2011 Keep Fort Collins Great (KFCG) monies and Laporte was scheduled for 2012 KFCG funding. The federal grant award has presented the opportunity to offset the 2011 KFCG allocation, and use those funds for the design of two other high priority bridge projects as well as the construction of the Laporte bridge in 2011. The 2011 KFCG dollars intended for the Shields Bridge project will be reassigned to the design of the Prospect and West Mulberry bridge projects, and to accelerate construction of the Laporte Bridge project in 2011. Attachment 5 Planning, Development & Transportation KFCG Update - Fall 2011 3 Offer 146.15 KFCG - Laporte-Whitcomb Bridge Replacement 2011 Original Budget: $0 2012 Original Budget: $670,000 The City of Fort Collins was awarded Federal grant funding to cover 80% of the cost of replacing two bridges: the Shields bridge near Rolland Moore and the Laporte-Whitcomb bridge. Due to this grant the Laporte-Whitcomb bridge will be funded and construction will start in 2011. We would request that the $670,000 of KFCG funds originally intended for the Laporte-Whitcomb bridge be redirected to fund one of the high priority bridge projects being designed in 2011. RESTORED SERVICES: Offer 146.25 KFCG - Surveying – Restored 2011 Original Budget: $14,130 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through April: $8,582 2012 Original Budget: $14,537 Expenditures to date have been to cover 20% of the cost of the Engineering technician position that was restored after a proposed budget cut. The 2011-12 budget reflects the restoration of this position to a full time equivalent (FTE), rather than .8 FTE. This has allowed the Engineering customer service counter to be staffed five days a week in order to provide complete customer service to both. Offer 117.5 KFCG - Reinstatement of Traffic Signal Technician 2011 Original Budget: $65,689 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through Aug: $5,000. 2012 Original Budget: $67,634 • Position hired and working on signal maintenance projects. Offer 117.7 KFCG - Traffic Sign Replacement Program 2011 Original Budget: $10,000 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through Aug: $10,000 2012 Original Budget: $30,000 • This offer is a part of the City’s ongoing traffic sign replacement program. • Signs are being installed throughout the year. Attachment 5 Planning, Development & Transportation KFCG Update - Fall 2011 4 Offer 117.19 KFCG - Streets & Traffic Ops Capital Equip Replacement –Prior Year Reductions 2011 Original Budget: $336,000 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through Aug: $336,000 2012 Original Budget: $564,000 • The Streets Department purchased the following equipment with the KFCG dollars: pothole patcher, saw trailer, two-way radio upgrade, snow plow and sander for utility truck. • Traffic installed new electrical conduit and rewired the traffic signals for video detection at College & Mountain, College & Olive, and College & Mulberry, as well as installed new pedestrian buttons at those intersections. Offer 131.12 KFCG - Transfort / Dial-A-Ride Night Service 2011 Original Budget: $44,150 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through August: $19,403 2012 Original Budget: $45,476 • Through July 2011, 771 evening trips were provided with KFCG funds. • Expenses to date represent 44% of total available funding and will continued to be incurred monthly based on actual activity. Offer 131.25 KFCG - Transfort Operations-Restore Saturday Service 2011 Original Budget: $150,000 Expenses Through July 31st: $95,730 2012 Original Budget: $150,000 • Expenses related to KFCG-funded Saturday Fixed Route Service. Through July 2011, KFCG funding has paid for 2,639 bus operator hours, $21,635 in vehicle preventive maintenance charges, and $13,250 in fuel charges. Offer 131.28 KFCG - Transfort Operations: Marketing – Restored 2011 Original Budget: $55,000 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through August: $11,978 2012 Original Budget: $55,000 • Expenditures to date include the design and printing of the newly formatted 2011 bus schedules. • Planned marketing activities for the remainder of 2011 include print and media advertising, design & printing of promotional materials, education and outreach activities, additional bus schedules, and specific route promotion events. PARKING SERVICES: Offer 8.6 KFCG - Downtown Parking / Parking Structure Study 2011 Original Budget: $80,000 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through August: $78,030 2012 Original Budget: $0 Attachment 5 Planning, Development & Transportation KFCG Update - Fall 2011 5 • Encumbered the majority of funds for a contract with the Parking Plan consultant. The consultant will help prepare the Plan and its recommendations. • A small amount of expenses were for data collection, including parking inventory and occupancy studies, and a citizen/business questionnaire. • Public outreach continued with board and commission meetings, meetings with the Downtown Business Association, and other stakeholders. Offer 111.8 KFCG - Old Town Parking Garage Maintenance 2011 Original Budget: $100,000 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through August: $ $40,541 2012 Original Budget: $100,000 • Lighting project: Fixtures at end of useful life, replace fixtures with energy-efficient fixtures throughout the garage; this project is complete. • Landscaping, canopy repairs, stairway repairs, miscellaneous lighting improvements, and other minor repairs: these projects will commence in May and continue through December. Offer 112.2 KFCG - Downtown Handicap Parking Spaces 2011 Original Budget: $15,000 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through August: $15,000 2012 Original Budget: $15,000 • Refurbishment and installation of six new spaces on College Avenue as part of the sidewalk refurbishment and College overlay project. This phase of this offer is complete. • Additional repairs to handicap spaces in the two Downtown parking structures. These improvements are in progress and will be complete by December. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING: Offer 116.2 KFCG - Bicycle Safety and Education Plan Implementation 2011 Original Budget: $50,000 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through August: $20,770 2012 Original Budget: $50,000 • Bicycle Safety and Education Plan approved by City Council - March 2011 • Bicycle Safety and Education Plan implementation work plan developed April - May 2011 • Funding has covered bike safety materials (helmets, lights, banners), Bike Safety Town planning, and bicycle safety education classes in partnership with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Education Coalition. • Implementation of action items began May 2011 Attachment 5 Planning, Development & Transportation KFCG Update - Fall 2011 6 Offer 113.4 KFCG - Harmony Road - Enhanced Travel Corridor Plan 2011 Original Budget: $75,000 Expenses and/or Encumbrances through August: $0 2012 Original Budget: $75,000 • Request for Proposal for consultant selection process is currently being advertised, proposals due September 19. • Expect consultant selection in September 2011 • Overview presentation scheduled for City Council in October 2011 • Begins third quarter 2011 through the end of 2012 Offer 113.6 KFCG - City Bicycle Coordinator/FC Bikes/Bike Library 2011 Original Budget: $0 2012 Original Budget: $80,613 • In 2011 the City Bicycle Coordinator, FC Bikes and the Bike Library are fully funded by the General Fund, as well as by state/federal grants. KFCG funds are needed to support these programs in 2012. Offer 115.3 KFCG - Railroad Quiet Zone Phase II Study 2011 Original Budget: $0 2012 Original Budget: $100,000 • The study will include the ten Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad crossings between Mulberry Street and Trilby Street. This includes crossings through Downtown Fort Collins, Colorado State University, the Mid-town and Mason Corridors, and South College Avenue. • The study will begin in January 2012 with Transportation Planning staff as project manager, with support from Traffic Operations and Engineering. Consulting services will be used to perform detailed technical analysis and coordination with railroad and federal agencies Attachment 6 2011 KFCG Transportation Related Projects 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 111.8 - Old Town Parking Garage Maintenance 112.2 - Downtown Handicap Parking Spaces 113.4 - Harmony Road Enhanced Travel Corridor Plan 114.3 - Transportation Capital and Master Plan Implementation 116.2 - Bicycle Safety & Education Plan Implementation 117.5 - Reinstatement of Traffic Signal Technician 117.7 - Traffic Sign Replacement Program 117.19 - Streets & Traffic Ops Capital Equipment Replacement 8.6 Downtown Parking/Parking Structure Study 127.22 - Streets Maintenance & Repair 131.12 - Transfort / Dial A Ride Night Service 131.25 - Transfort Operations - Restore Saturday Service 131.28 - Transfort Operations - Restore Marketing 146.5 - Street Oversizing Capital Expansion Fee Program 146.25 - Surveying - Restored 146.14 - City Bridges Program % Spent or Encumbered % Remaining Attachment 7 2007 Additional Fixed Route service w/ new ADA-Mandated Paratransit Service Area Transfort/DAR Service Area Showing Potential Service Expansion ATTACHMENT 8 FINANCIAL IMPACTS OF TRANSIT ADVERTISING Attachment 9 REVENUE TYPE TERM EARLY TERMINATION GUARANTEED REVENUE TO CITY AVG ANNUAL REVENUE Bus Benches & Shelters Expires 12/31/2021 Allowed $ 100,000 $ 123,000 Bus Ads - Exterior & Interior Spaces Expires 09/30/2011 Allowed $ 70,000 * Bus Ads - Contract Pending 10/01/2011 - 09/30/2016 Allowed $ 101,000 SUBTOTAL $ 201,000 $ 193,000 EXPENSE EXPENSE TYPE EXPENSE Operating & Maintenance of shelters & benches Annual - On-going $ 150,000 Capital expenses - additions, repair, replacement Annual - On-going $ 150,000 SUBTOTAL $ 300,000 SUMMARY REVENUE LOST EXPENSES INCURRED Annual On-going Bus Benches & Shelters $ (123,000) $ (300,000) Bus Ads - Exterior & Interior Spaces $ (101,000) $ - SUBTOTAL $ (224,000) $ (300,000) $ (524,000) One-Time Costs Buy-out of existing shelters and benches $ (120,000) Year of Contract Termination Costs $ (644,000) Annual On-Going Costs $ (524,000) Bottom Line: NOTE: Contractor bears all costs including maintenance with specified conditions including clean, graffiti-free, and reasonably litter-free; snow removal, repair and replacement of damaged benches, shelters, or panel. If the advertising is eliminated, annual revenue for Transfort services will be reduced by $224,000 or more. Operating & maintenance expenses will increase by $300,000 for a net loss of $524,000 annually. 1 1 Capital Construction Projects September 27, 2011 Helen Migchelbrink City Engineer Transportation Update 2 2011 Transportation Capital Projects ROAD IMPROVEMENTS BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS I-25 INTERCHANGE CONSTRUCTION INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS MAX Project HWY 287 TAFT HILL COLLEGE LEMAY TIMBERLINE MULBERRY PROSPECT DRAKE HORSETOOTH HARMONY HWY 392 25 SHIELDS LINDEN LAPORTE MAX Project Transportation Update ATTACHMENT 10 2 3 Capital Projects • Safety and capacity improvements: – Bridges – Intersections – Roads – Interchange • MAX Construction Project 4 Capital Projects - Bridges High priority bridge projects in 2011: – South Shields bridge Just south of Rolland Moore Park – Laporte-Whitcomb bridge • Load restricted, lowest rated bridge 3 5 Capital Projects- Intersections • Addressing Safety & Capacity issues • Key locations for Turn Lanes: – Harmony & Lemay – Drake & Lemay 6 Capital Projects - Roads Linden Streetscape Project, Jefferson to Poudre River – Curb & gutter, parking, bike & pedestrian – Intersection improvements – Streetscape – First project in new Downtown River District 4 7 Capital Projects - Roads North College Improvements, Vine to Hemlock, Conifer – Curb, gutter, sidewalk, bike lane, and access safety improvements – Key Gateway for north Fort Collins – Parkway & Streetscape Current Conditions Planned Improvements 8 Capital Projects – I-25/SH-392 Interchange I-25 & SH-392 Interchange Improvements – Fort Collins, Windsor & CDOT partnership – $22.5M in State & Fed funds; $5M Local Share – Construction began summer 2011 5 9 Capital Projects – I-25/SH-392 Interchange 10 Capital projects: MAX Update • Schedule • Station Designs • South Transit Center • Transfort Maintenance Facility Expansion • NRRC Overpass 6 11 MAX Funding • Total Project Cost $87M • Project Construction Grant Agreement Expected in Feb 2012 • Operations – May 2014 12 7 13 MAX Stations Locator Map 14 MAX Downtown Stations 8 15 MAX Downtown Stations Mountain Olive Laurel Mulberry 16 MAX CSU Stations University Prospect 9 17 MAX Stations Swallow Drake Bay Farm 18 MAX Stations Harmony Troutman Horsetooth 10 19 MAX Project: South Transit Center 20 MAX Project: Transfort Maintenance Facility Expansion 11 21 MAX – NRRC/ Bay Farm Overpass 22 MAX – NRRC/Bay Farm Overpass •Connects to high density employment and shopping areas •Provides east-west connection between Prospect & Drake 12 23 MAX – NRRC/Bay Farm Overpass •• Need for ADA compliant crossing •• At-At -grade crossing prohibited by PUC •• Overpass most cost effective option •• Fulfills BNSF agreement terms •• Provides access to Bay Farm MAX station 24 Questions for Council • Does Council have any questions regarding this update? • Do you need additional information regarding scheduled construction projects? 1 1 Transportation Update Keep Fort Collins Great Transportation Projects September 27, 2011 Mark Jackson PDT Budget, Policy & Communications Manager 2 KFCG Transportation Update • Significant Impact on Ability to Deliver Services • KFCG Adds Over $9 Million in 2011 – $6.17M Street Maintenance – $3.17M Other Transportation Needs • Capital Projects • Restored Services • Planning & Programs ATTACHMENT 11 2 3 KFCG Transportation Update Street Maintenance • KFCG Nearly Doubled Street Maintenance Budget – $6.7M Budget 2010 – $13.8M Budget in 2011 w/KFCG • Represents ability to repair and maintain an additional 36 lane miles of road • Proof Is On The Street! 4 KFCG Transportation Update Street Maintenance Using KFCG Funds: Completed • Conifer, College to Lemay • East Horsetooth, College to Timberline • Meadowlark Neighborhood (south of Swallow) Underway • Vine Drive, Lemay to I-25 • Valley Forge, Taft to Hampshire • Drake, Meadowlark to BNSF railroad tracks Scheduled for 2011 • Parkwood East Neighborhood 3 5 KFCG Transportation Update Capital Projects Using KFCG Funds: Bridges • South Shields Bridge (Fall 2011) • Laporte-Whitcomb Bridge (Fall 2011) • Small Capital Projects (Flexible Funds) • Skyway Transit Stop and Sidewalk • Drake–Redwing Pedestrian Signal • Transfort Concrete Bus Pad Improvement • Mason Trail – Troutman Ped Underpass Supplemental • Miscellaneous Sidewalk and Ped Ramp Repairs Large Capital Project • North College Improvements (Design Phase III) 6 KFCG Transportation Update Restored Services Using KFCG Funds: • Engineering Surveying Services • Traffic Operations Signal Technician • Streets and Traffic Operations Capital Equipment • Traffic Sign Replacement Program • Transfort/Dial a Ride Night Service • Transfort Saturday Service • Transfort Marketing & Education 4 7 KFCG Transportation Update Planning & Programs Using KFCG: • Parking Services – Old Town Parking Garage Maintenance – Downtown Parking Study – Downtown Handicap Parking Spaces • Transportation Capital Expansion Fee Program – (Street Oversizing Program) • Transportation Planning: – Harmony Corridor Enhanced Transportation Corridor Plan – Bicycle Safety & Education Plan Implementation – FC Bikes Program (2012) – Railroad Quiet Zone Study, Phase II (late 2011, 2012) 8 KFCG Transportation Update Unspent & Additional KFCG Funds: Roll Forward into 2012 Fund Categories • Street Maintenance Funds Stay in Street Maintenance • “Other Transportation” Funds remain in designated category • KFCG Funds Can Be Leveraged With Other Resources 5 9 KFCG Transportation Update Summary: • KFCG Funding Nothing Short of a “Game Changer” • Nearly Doubled Street Maintenance Funding • Restored services, initiated important small and large projects, and leveraged state and federal funds • Not the long term solution for capital and maintenance needs, but helping improve Fort Collins immensely! 1 1 Transportation Update: Transfort September 27, 2011 Marlys Sittner Transfort General Manager 2 Transportation Update: Transfort Two Discussion Items: • Transit Service Expansion Request - Southeast • Advertising on Buses, Bus Benches, & Shelters ATTACHMENT 12 2 3 Issue #1: Expanding Transit to Southeast Fort Collins Citizen-Generated Request: – New Fixed Route Service South of Harmony Road on Lemay Avenue to Trilby Road – Complementary paratransit service ¾ of a mile of Fixed Route (per ADA regulations) 4 Direction sought from Council: Staff seeks direction from City Council in addressing citizen requests for transit service in southeast Fort Collins Expanding Transit to Southeast Fort Collins 3 5 Requested Expansion – Fixed Route south of Harmony Road on Lemay Avenue to Trilby Road – Complementary paratransit service ¾ mile of Fixed Route 6 Current Transfort Service Policies Fixed Route: – Expanded and Realigned per 2009 Transfort Strategic Operating Plan. Paratransit: – Complementary to Fixed Route service per ADA. Expanding Transit to Southeast Fort Collins 4 7 Current Transfort Service Policies Exceptions Made: – Additional paratransit service hours; 11:00 PM. – Eligible paratransit passengers grandfathered into service area. – Approved by City Council in 2006 Expanding Transit to Southeast Fort Collins 8 Impact of the Service Policy Change - 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Senior & Disabled Ridership Mode Split FIXED ROUTE PARATRANSIT 5 9 Impact of the Service Policy Change • Senior & Disabled ridership increased 22%; an average of 5.5% per year. • Mode split in 2010 was 89% Fixed / 11% Paratransit; compared to 72% Fixed / 28% Paratransit in 2006. • 2010 trip costs: $1.88 Fixed & $28.43 Paratransit. • Providing more rides to Seniors & People w Disabilities at Lower Cost due to Mode Shift. Cumulative estimate $5.0 M over 4 years. 10 – Option 1: Fixed route and ADA-required complementary paratransit service. Cost: $320,000. – Option 2: Add the paratransit service without the fixed route bus service. Cost: $85,000. – Option 3: Include as Enhanced BFO Offer in City’s 2013-2014 budget. Expanding Transit to Southeast Fort Collins 6 11 Option 1: Provide Service as requested. Pros: • Meets citizens’ request • Aligns with 2009 Transfort Strategic Plan • Consistent with Dial-A-Ride policy Cons: • Realign East/West for MAX and other services are higher priority in Strategic Operating Plan Expanding Transit to Southeast Fort Collins 12 Option 2: Paratransit Only Without Fixed Route Service. Pros: • Lesser Cost • Will meet some of the Citizens’ Request Cons: • Inconsistent with Dial-A-Ride Policy • Other un-served areas within City Limits raises equity issues Expanding Transit to Southeast Fort Collins 7 13 Option 3: Direct staff to write a BFO offer for this service. Pros: • Maintains the adopted budgeting process for funding additional city services. Cons: • Does not meet Citizens’ request for transit service in the near term. Expanding Transit to Southeast Fort Collins 14 Direction sought from Council: – Staff seeks direction from City Council in addressing citizen requests for transit service in southeast Fort Collins Expanding Transit to Southeast Fort Collins 8 15 Issue #2: Advertising on Buses, Benches, & Shelters Context: – City Council expressed concern regarding advertising on buses, benches and shelters. – City Staff submitted background information and analysis on the impacts of eliminating the advertising. 16 Advertising on Buses, Benches, & Shelters Direction Sought from Council – Should the City execute a new bus interior/exterior advertising contract on September 30, 2011? – Should the City maintain its current bus bench and shelter advertising contract with Next Media? 9 17 Financial Impact of Eliminating Transit Advertising: – Lost revenue to offset transit expenses is approximately $224,000 annually. – Benches and Shelters revenue averages $123,000. – Bus Advertising is guaranteed at $101,000. Advertising on Buses, Benches, & Shelters 18 Financial Impact Continued: – One-time Capital Expense; Contract requires purchase of existing bus shelters & benches; Estimated at $120,000. – Annual Ongoing Capital, Operating and Maintenance; Estimated at $300,000 additional. Advertising on Buses, Benches, & Shelters 10 19 Financial Impact Summarized: – One-Time Capital Expense $120,000 – Annual Revenue lost $224,000 – Annual Expenses - $300,000 – Impact on Transit Services: $524,000 annually. Advertising on Buses, Benches, & Shelters 20 Options: 1. Maintain Advertising. 2. Eliminate any or all advertising and resource Transit Services from other City Funds. 3. Eliminate any or all advertising and reduce Transit Services to offset impacts. Impact of full elimination without additional funds would require eliminating 8% of transit services which is the equivalent of 2-3 routes. Advertising on Buses, Benches, & Shelters 11 21 Advertising on Buses, Benches, & Shelters Direction Sought from Council – Should the City execute a new bus interior/exterior advertising contract on September 30, 2011? – Should the City maintain its current bus bench and shelter advertising contract with Next Media? 22 Bus Bench and Shelter