HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 07/13/2010 - ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED 2009 INTERNATIONAL CODES, DATE: July 13, 2010
STAFF: Steve Dush WORK SESSION ITEM
Mike Gebo FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL
Pre-taped staff presentation: available
at fcgov.com/c/erk/agendas.php
SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION
Adoption of the Proposed 2009 International Codes, Including Local Amendments.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed 2009 International Codes represent a comprehensive fully integrated body of codes
regulating building construction and systems using prescriptive and performance-related provisions.
The purpose of these Codes is to establish the minimum requirements to safeguard the public health,
safety and general welfare by regulating structural strength and. stability, sanitation, light and
ventilation, energy conservation, and property protection from hazards attributed to the built
environment within the City of Fort Collins.
The proposed 2009 International Codes would replace the 2006 International Building Code(IBC)
and the 2006 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), which were adopted in July 2008.
Additionally, this adoption would replace the remaining "core codes": the 2003 International
Residential Code(IRC),2003 International Mechanical Code(IMC),and the 2003 International Fuel
Gas Code (IFGC), all of which were adopted in January 2005.
Although the 2006 IBC and the 2006 IECC were adopted two years ago, the remaining Codes are
now five years from the last update. In an attempt to reduce frequent adoptions of only the most
outdated codes, staff proposes this adoption in order to align the five interconnected basic
construction codes under one published edition year cycle.
GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED
1. Does Council have any concerns with the proposed 2009 International Code provisions or
amendments from the recommended adoption package, such as the effective date of the
residential sprinkler requirement?
2. Does Council concur with staff presenting the adopting ordinances for Council's
consideration on First and Second Readings (September 7, 2010 and September 21, 2010,
respectively) with a subsequent effective date of October 1, 2010?
July 13, 2010 Page 2
BACKGROUND
History of Fort Collins' Current Codes
Building codes and standards are reviewed and voted on by construction industry professionals from
across the country and published every three years under the oversight of the International Code
Council (ICC). The first editions of the International Codes published by the ICC was the 2000
International Codes; the latest publications brought forth by the ICC are the proposed 2009
International Codes.
Since 1924, the City of Fort Collins has periodically reviewed, amended, and adopted the latest
nationally recognized building standards available for the times.The City has updated the minimum
construction standards twelve times since 1924.
In 2004, City staff and a committee of local construction industry volunteers initially reviewed the
2003 edition of ICC's International Codes.The committee and staff focused efforts on reviewing the
2003 International Mechanical Code(IMC),2003 International Fuel Gas Code(IFGC)and the 2003
International Residential Code(IRC)which included updating the City's Residential Energy Code.
This review effort culminated in the adoption in January 2005 of the 2003 IRC,2003 IMC and 2003
IFGC with amendments. Commercial construction minimum standards remained under the 1997
Uniform Building Code (UBC).
In 2006, staff convened a committee of local volunteers whose purpose was to evaluate,review and
recommend for adoption the 2006 International Building Code (IBC) to replace the outdated 1997
UBC. In late 2007, the adoption of the 2006 IBC was delayed in order to allow time to review the
2006 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) along with the newly published 2007
Supplement to the 2006 IBC. (ICC publishes supplements mid-cycle of the edition year as a prelude
to items anticipated to be included in the next code edition.) This review culminated in the July
2008 adoption of the 2006 IECC and the IBC, including many of the 2007 Supplement changes as
local amendments.
2009 International Codes Fort Collins' Review Process
Community and industry stakeholders' review of new building codes is critical as new minimum
standards often impact the cost of construction. In July 2009, a committee was convened for the
purpose of reviewing and recommending the adoption of the proposed 2009 International Codes.
The stakeholders' committee represented a wide spectrum of volunteers from across the local
construction industry,including private developers,builders,architects,engineers,building officials
from neighboring j urisdictions and representatives from the Building Review Board and the Poudre
Fire Authority. (Attachment 1)
The committee was tasked with reviewing the significant changes of the proposed 2009 International
Codes and evaluating those changes against the local amendments to the currently adopted editions,
removing or proposing local amendments as needed.
July 13, 2010 Page 3
The committee members understood that contractors who work within numerous jurisdictions can
be confused by different code editions and local amendments between jurisdictions;especially those
local amendments that are unnecessary or that produce minimum improvements to the health and
safety of the public. The review committee members agreed to assist the local development and
construction industry by supporting code consistency throughout the Front Range by:
• Limiting the number of local amendments to the national standards only to those deemed
necessary. The committee members are satisfied that the Fort Collins local amendments
proposed have been reduced in number wherever possible and represent necessary changes
to the national standard.
• Supporting neighboring jurisdictions along the Front Range in adoption of the 2009
International Codes in a 2010-2011 timeframe. Many Colorado jurisdictions have scheduled
the adoption of the 2009 International Codes within this timeframe. (Attachment 2)
On April 22, 2010, the committee concluded its review of the 2009 International Codes and voted
unanimously to support the adoption of the proposed 2009 International Codes, including local
amendments.
Overview/Highlights of the 2009 International Codes Significant-Changes
The following information identifies the key significant changes to each of the proposed
International Codes. (For a detailed list of the I-Code changes please see Attachment 3A. A quick
"at-a-glance"look of the proposed local amendments to the 2009 I-Codes is provided in Attachment
3B.)
• 2009 International Building Code (IBC)
The 2009 IBC establishes minimum standards regulating construction of all commercial and multi-
family projects and updates the current 2006 IBC in the following aspects:
l. Improves definitions of various occupancy/use groups intended to assist the code official
with correct placement within a specific occupancy. Correct occupancy classification
establishes all subsequent code requirements for the project.
2. Requires emergency responder-based safety improvements such as:
a. Antennae systems required within all commercial buildings improving emergency
radio coverage.
b: One additional stairway required beyond the minimum number of exit/egress
stairways required in buildings with occupied floors 75 feet above grade level.
C. Fire-suppression systems(sprinklers)now required in furniture stores due to the high
fire load of the fabrics and upholstery.
d. Fire-suppression systems' pump rooms now required to be fire-rated allowing the
sprinkler pumps to operate longer in a fire event.
3. Allows special locking devices on egress doors in nursing homes accommodating safe
emergency exiting while limiting movement of patients with diseases such as Alzheimer's.
4. Requires wheelchair accessibility and assisted listening devices throughout courtrooms,
including witness stands,jury box and work tables.
July 13, 2010 Page 4
5. Incorporates new or updated product/installation standards improving the City's ability to
review and inspect concrete materials and placement,steel,masonry and wood construction,
including log structures.
6. Increases guard rail heights when installed behind fixed seating when the seating is along the
edge of raised decks or balconies for added safety to children standing on the f xed seating.
Review Committee's Conclusion
There are no significant changes in the 2009 IBC that the review committee considered to be
controversial or overly expensive to new construction.
• 2009 International Residential Code (IRC)
Establishes minimum standards regulating construction of all single-family,duplex,and townhome
projects and updates the current 2003 IRC in the following aspects:
1. Improves the definition of"story above grade plane"which is used to determine the numbers
of stories in a building. Determining the number of stories establishes whether the IRC is
the appropriate code since the IRC regulations are limited to three-story buildings.
2. Increases guard rail heights when installed behind fixed.seating when the seating is along the
edge of raised decks or balconies for added safety to children standing on the fixed seating.
3. Incorporates new or updated product/installation standards improving the City's ability to
review and inspect light-weight steel framing, Structural Insulated Panels (SIPS)products,
wood construction, including log structures.
4. Requires all new dwelling units built under the 2009 IRC and constructed after January 1,
2011 to be provided with a residential fire-suppression system(sprinkler).
5. Incorporates the 2009 IECC residential energy chapter within the IRC chapter 11, energy
conservation. Increases the efficiency and R-Value rating of insulation installed in exterior
walls and in floors above unconditioned spaces. Includes new requirements that insulation
be placed beneath radiant floor heat which directs the heat upward into the room.
Review Committee's Conclusion
A significant change in the 2009 IRC that the review committee considered to be controversial is
the Fire-Suppression'systems in single-family homes. The committee supports adopting the
residential sprinkler requirements and delaying effective date to January 1, 2013.
Fire-Suppression Systems in New Single Family Homes Overview
The 2009 IRC Section R313.1 requires that all new townhomes(townhomes are identified as single-
family dwellings attached to another single-family dwelling where each owner purchases the ground
beneath their dwelling) be provided with a residential fire suppression system effective the date of
the Code adoption. The committee members did not express concern over this new requirement.
2009 IRC Section R313.2, requiring residential fire-suppression systems in all new one and two-
family homes effective January 1,2011,did however,cause significant discussion within the review
committee,as well as across the state of Colorado. For reference purposes,there are three National
July 13, 2010 Page 5
Fire Prevention Association-(NFPA) approved fire-suppression systems that can be installed in
residential dwelling units:
1. NFPA 13R(Residential)which is classified as a"stand-alone"fire-suppression system for
use in multi-family buildings. The system is piped separately from other water systems and
certain spaces must be protected with sprinklers, including closets. This is the system
installed in multi-family buildings constructed under the IBC.
2. NFPA 13D(Dwelling)which is classified as a"stand-alone"fire-suppression system for use
in single family detached buildings. The system is piped separately from other water systems
and only major habitable spaces must be protected with sprinklers.
3. IRC Section P2904 (Plumbing system) is a dwelling unit fire-suppression system which
is classified as combination potable water and fire-suppression system. The cold water
piping is interconnected between plumbing fixtures to sprinkler heads throughout the
dwelling unit.
One reason that the requirement of a fire-suppression system in new single family homes has become
a statewide discussion is that the State of Colorado Division of Fire Safety requires certifications and
licensing of installers of"stand-alone"fire-suppression systems(the 13R and 13D systems). On the
other hand, the State Plumbing and Electrical Board requires that persons installing potable water
systems shall be licensed and certified as plumbers,so only plumbers would be allowed to install the
IRC P2904 combination potable water fire-suppression system. Most plumbers however, are not
familiar with fire-suppressions systems, including the new IRC P2904 system, and would require '
additional training in fire-suppression systems.
The State recently passed House Bill 1241 which specifies that State licensed plumbers are to install
the P2904 systems when a backflow valve is not installed on the system. Installing a backflow value
creates a "stand-alone" system equivalent to the NFPA 13D which is to be installed by persons
licensed through the Division of Fire Safety. The State Plumbing Board will move to develop
training and education programs for plumbers outlining the sizing and installation requirements of
the new IRC P2904 combination fire-suppression system.
Another point in the statewide discussion is the IRC effective date of the requirement being January
1,2011. Many jurisdictions expressed a need for more time to address issues such as the availability
of the water supply required to service such fire-suppression systems, especially in partially
completed subdivisions where the water main infrastructure is already installed. Additionally,there
is a concern over utility companies' policies regarding the disconnection of water service to fire-
sprinkled dwellings for non-payment.
In September 2009,a joint ad-hoc committee consisting of Colorado ICC member jurisdictions and
the Fire Marshal's Association of Colorado published a paper that discussed the issues described
above. The joint statement recommended that jurisdictions should adopt the 2009 IRC Section
R313.2, including Section P2904, but amending the effective date to January 1, 2013. The stated
purpose of delaying the effective date is to allow time for the legislative changes, train personnel,
reduce system cost and gain more wide-spread acceptance for residential sprinkler system
installations. The recommendation is supported by over 40 (forty) Colorado jurisdictions and
associations. (Attachment 4)
July 13, 2010 I Page 6
Staff is proposing adoption of the 20091RC, including the residential fire-sprinkler sections and
Section P2904, with an effective date ofdanuary 1, 2013.
• 2009 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
J
The 2009 International Mechanical Code has minimum standards regulating the installation of all
mechanical air handling systems, updating the current 2003 IMC in the following aspects:
1. Establishes new requirements regulating temporary heating systems used during building
construction.
2. Provides a new calculation method to be used in determining the minimum fresh air required
to be provided by the mechanical equipment in commercial buildings. Only the breathable-
space cubic feet is calculated,resulting in lower volumes of fresh air needing to be tempered,
heated or cooled, which in turn reduces overall energy consumption.
3. Incorporates a new exhaust venting approach which allows multiple dryers to exhaust into
one common vent system, addressing problems typically encountered when installing dryer
vents in multi-story buildings.
4. Includes new requirements that specify that insulation is to be installed beneath hydronic
floor heating, whether installed in concrete or wood floors. Improves energy efficiency of
the heating system by directing the heat upwards into the habitable space.
Review Committee's Conclusion
There are no significant changes in the 2009 IMC that the review committee considered to be
controversial or overly expensive to new construction.
• 2009 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
The 2009 International Fuel Gas Code contains minimum standards regulating the installation of all
natural gas and propane fueled appliances and equipment, updating the current 2003 IFGC in the
following aspects:
1. Includes clear requirements addressing the installation of natural gas lines when run
underneath buildings while providing notification to the occupants of any leak in the under-
building system.
2. Incorporates new products and installation standards into the body of the Code, removing
staff s need to research the manufacturer's information on such products.
Review Committee's Conclusion
There are no significant changes in the 2009 IFGC that the review committee considered to be
controversial or overly expensive to new construction.
July 13, 2010 Page 7
• 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
The 2009 International Energy Conservation Code establishes minimum energy efficiency criteria
for all commercial and residential projects and replaces the current Fort Collins Residential Energy
Code and the separate commercial energy code with one up-to-date national energy standard.
Commercial
Fort Collins currently requires that commercial buildings comply with the American Society of
Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. ASHRAE 90.1-2007.
ASHRAE 90.1-2007 is equivalent to the proposed 2009 IECC in all aspects except where the 2009
IECC increases the R-Value of insulation in walls in metal buildings from R-13 to R-13
w/continuous R-5.6.
Residential
The 2009 IECC replaces the local amendment"Fort Collins Residential Energy Code"and improves
the energy efficiency of residential projects in the following aspects:
I. Increases exterior wall insulation R-Value minimums from R-15 to R-20.
2. Increases insulation R-Value minimums in floors above unconditioned spaces such as
bedrooms over garages from R-19 to R-30.
3. Requires that all new homes be provided with a programmable thermostat which allows the
occupant better control of heating and cooling, replacing the standard on-off type of
thermostat.
4. Requires all forced air duct systems to be tested for tightness which increases the air flow to
conditioned spaces and improving overall efficiency of the heating/cooling system and
comfort of the occupants.
5. Requires that fifty percent of the dwelling units fixed lighting fixtures be high efficacy
lighting, such as compact fluorescent fixtures.
Review Committee's Conclusion
There are significant changes in the 2009 IECC that will impact the cost ofresidential construction.
The increased cost of installing higher rated insulation should be offset by the monthly savings on
the utility bills, compared with the baseline home, while providing higher consumer comfort levels.
The review committee did not consider these insulation increases to be controversial or overly
expensive to new construction.
Cost estimates of the two most significant changes in the proposed 2009 International Codes
1. Residential Fire-Suppressions Systems
As mentioned above in the 2009 IRC overview, a significant change which will add to residential
construction costs,starting the effective date of the Code section,is the requirement that all new one
and two-family dwellings be provided with a residential fire-suppression system.
July 13, 2010 Page 8
Staff is recommending that the implementation date be delayed until January 1, 2013 which is
consistent with the recommendationsfrom both the Fort Collins 2009 1-Code review committee and
the Colorado ICC- Fire Marshals ad-hoc committee.
Installers of fire-suppression systems have estimated the costs of installing a"stand-alone" system
(13R or 13D)range from$1.50-$3.50 per square foot of floor area. The estimated cost for installing
the IRC P2904 combination potable water and fire-sprinkler system is approximately $2.20 per
square foot of floor area. The complexity of the dwelling unit's floor plan will be the driving
influence on square floor cost.
2. Residential Energy Efficiency Improvements
As mentioned in the 2009 IECC overview,the increased insulation R-Values required in new homes
will impact the initial construction cost, effective the date of adoption of the Code. The improved
insulation R-Values are expected to lower monthly energy cost and improve indoor environment
comfort level to the consumer while helping to reduce energy consumption of the community. It is
estimated that these' improvements will add additional costs of approximately $2,400 per new
dwelling unit.
Calculations using a sample baseline home comparing current energy code requirements with the
proposed 2009 IECC indicate that the increased cost of construction, when added to the mortgage,
can be mostly, if not entirely, offset by the savings in the monthly utility bills. (Attachment 5) .
• Overall Benefits of the proposed 2009 International Codes
1. Fire-Suppression Systems
Building codes of the 1980s and 1990s established construction techniques designed to limit or
contain the spread of fire through fire-rated walls and ceilings. The 2006 IBC introduced the change
in ICC's philosophy which promoted fire extinguishing over fire containment by requiring fire-
suppression systems in new multi-family buildings. The 2009 IRC continues this ICC philosophy
of extinguishment over containment by requiring the installation of a fire-suppression system within
new single-family, duplex and townhome projects.
Poudre Fire Authority responded to four structure fires in 2009 where a residential fire-suppression
system was involved. The residential suppression system extinguished two of the events with only
limited damage to the dwelling; an occupant extinguished a third event before the suppression
system was activated; and the fourth fire originated on the exterior and grew large enough to
overcome the residential fire-suppression system, causing extensive damage to the dwelling.
(Attachment 6A)
According to the National Fire Protection Association(NFPA),residential fire-suppression systems
can quickly extinguish an interior fire, resulting in 40-70 percent less fire damage to the dwelling
over a non-sprinkled dwelling, while using far less water than a typical fire-hose. (Attachment 6B)
Contrary to the belief that fire sprinkler systems increase insurance rates because of leaks in the
system, the Insurance Service Office (ISO) estimates that insurance premiums should reflect a
July 13, 2010 Page 9
reduction of about eight percent when the residential sprinkler requirement is adopted. (Attachment
7)
2. Energy Efficiency
Fort Collins has long been a northern Colorado energy conservation leader, mostly through the
adoption of increasingly progressive energy codes. The 2006 IECC and ASHRAE 90.1-2007 are the
currently adopted energy conservation codes for the City which is in compliance with the Governors
Energy Office minimum standards for the State. According to ICC, the proposed 2009 IECC
improves the energy efficiency of the current residential standards by an estimated fifteen percent.
(Attachment 8)
3. Fort Collins as a Northern Colorado Leader
Fort Collins is the largest community in northern Colorado and in many ways is seen as a leader
among neighboring jurisdictions. Some neighboring jurisdictions are awaiting Fort Collins'
adoption of the 2009 International Codes. They see it as an opportunity to review the local
amendments added by Fort Collins and,if applicable,to bring forward to their managers and elected
officials.
4. Insurance Service Office Rating
Fort Collins enjoys an outstanding Insurance Service Office (ISO) rating of two out of ten, with a
one being best. ISO is a private agency that serves the insurance industry, with one of its primary
functions being to establish a jurisdiction's insurance rates based on an individual jurisdiction's
"building code effectiveness" ranking. The ranking uses a standardized grading system known as
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS). A jurisdiction's adopted building code
is factored into ISO's grading system with the latest national standards weighted better than older
editions.
5. General Code Improvements
The proposed Codes include changes that improve firefighter safety during a building emergency,
provide improvements that will provide better service to the aged and disabled community,improves
energy efficiency of buildings, and provides the building services department with the latest
information addressing all construction and systems.
6. Alignment of the Core Building Codes
The two remaining codes that complete the package of the "core" building codes used to regulate
construction are the Plumbing and Electrical Codes. Colorado's Plumbing and Electric Board is the
state agency that establishes minimum plumbing and electrical standards for use statewide. The
Board adopted the 2009 International Plumbing Code (IPC) in April of this year and the 2008
National Electric Code(NEC)is the current State Electrical Code. Both the 2009 IPC and the 2008
NEC are incorporated into the plumbing and electrical sections of the 2009 IRC.
July 13, 2010 Page 10
The five proposed 2009 International Codes represent the remaining"core"minimum construction
standards to be adopted by a jurisdiction and applied to all construction. These ICC published Codes
are completely integrated, meaning that one Code references requirements of another. There are
many instances where the 2009 IBC makes reference to the International Mechanical, International
Energy or International Fuel Gas Codes. ICC's intent is that the referenced Codes are of the same
edition year.
7. Base for Future Green Building Program
The proposed 2009 International,Codes are recognized industry standards which are periodically
reviewed and are designed to ensure the minimum health,safety,and welfare of citizens and property
through the enforcement of the latest construction standards,including connected trades work. The
adoption of a single year's edition of the base codes helps to serve as a consistent level-playing
platform for the addition of programs which can exceed the minimum standards, such as the Green
Building Program.
Staff from Fort Collins Utilities is developing a Green Building Program by reviewing two new
national models for residential and commercial green construction. The scope of these new models
covers all aspects of green building, but does not address minimum health, safety and welfare
addressed in the proposed 2009 International Codes.Consideration of these green building standards
for future adoption would not negate the need for adoption of the latest national International Codes.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Staff conducted an extensive outreach program, presenting an overview of the 2009 International
Codes to various boards and commissions seeking their opinions and comments. A public open
house meeting was held on the evening of June 17, 2010, with specific invitations to the Board of
Realtors and the Home Builders Association. In general, all groups supported the adoption of the
core building codes under a single year's edition; all groups supported the notion of limiting local
amendments where possible. There was concern regarding the cost increases for residential
construction, particularly around the fire-suppression systems proposed for enactment January 1,
2013.
A brief overview of comments received is provided below with minutes included as Attachment 9.
• Affordable Housing Board, May 6 and July 1, 2010. Provided general support for the
adoption of the proposed 2009 International Codes including the energy efficiency
improvements but expressed concerns over the cost increase due to the fire-suppression
systems proposed for 2013.
• Commission on Disability, May 13, 2010. Provided full support for the adoption of the
proposed 2009 International Codes
• Air Quality Advisory Board, May 17, 2010. Provided support for the adoption of the
proposed 2009 International Codes, requested that materials off-gassing be looked into
during the next adoption process.
• Natural Resource Advisory Board,May 19, 2010. Provided support for the adoption of the
energy code and refrained from addressing codes outside their knowledge base.
July 13, 2010 Page 11
1
• Building Review Board, May 27, 2010. Provided full support for the adoption of the
proposed 2009 International Codes
• Fort Collins Board of Realtors, June 1, 2010. Provided support for the adoption of the
proposed 2009 International Codes
• Electric Board, June 2, 2010. Provided full support for the adoption of the proposed 2009
International Code
• Landmark Preservation Commission, June 9, 2010. Provided full support for the adoption
of the proposed 2009 International Code
• Water Board, June 17, 2010. Provided support for the adoption of the proposed 2009
International Codes, requested a staff update prior to the enactment of the residential fire-
suppression systems in single family homes.
• Open Public Meeting, June 17, 2010. There was general support for the adoption of the
proposed 2009 International Codes and citizens expressed concern about the cost of the
residential fire-suppressions systems.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends adopting the 2009 International Codes with amendments within the timetable as
proposed.
Next Steps
• Council consideration of First Reading of Ordinances adopting the Codes - September 7,
2010.
• Council consideration of Second Reading of Ordinances adopting the Codes-September 21,
2010.
• Effective Date, October 1, 2010.
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2009 I-Code Review Committee members
2. Jurisdictions' adopted codes w/sprinkler effective date
3. A. Summary of Significant Code Changes
B. Summary of Significant Local Amendments
4. Residential Fire-sprinkler report from ICC members and State Fire Marshals
5. Residential energy increase costs estimates
6. A. Poudre Fire Authority support of Residential Fire-suppression Systems
B. NFPA Fire Sprinkler facts sheet.
7. ISO statement paper re: Fire-suppression Systems and Premiums
8.. ICC's published statement of energy efficiency improvements
9. Minutes from Boards and Commissions and public comment
10. Acronym glossary
11. Power point presentation
ATTACHMENT 1
Planning, Development & Transportation Services
F City of Community Development&Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
®rt` Collins P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins,CO 80522.0580
970.416.2740
970.224.6134-fax
fcgov.com
FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
JULY 13, 2010
2009 International Codes Review Committee
Chris Allison Building Official Longmont
Dick Anderson Architect Anderson Architects
John Baker Contractor Delta Construction
Mike Campana Developer Bellisimo Inc.
James Cherry Engineer CTL Thompson
Mike Delay Contractor Neenan
Gary Dennsion Architect Vaught/Frye Architects
Arne Drennan Contractor Drennan Contracting
Holger Durre Fire Inspector PFA
Jon Estabrook Contractor Aspen Homes
Tom Garton Building Official Larimer Cty
Mike Gebo Building Official Fort Collins
Stan Griep Plan Reviewer Larimer Cty
Mike Missimer HVAC Roberts Htg/Air
Shaun Moscrip Engineer Aller-Lingle Architects
Kevin Packham Designer KCP Design
Dave Philips Contractor Stoner Co.
Jeff Schneider Builder HBA & BRB
Monica Sweere Builder Paladian Homes
Jeremy Tamlin Contractor Dohn Construction
Jon Tschetter Contractor Tschetter Co.
Kevin Wilson Fire Marshal PFA
ATTACHMENT#2
Building Code Comparison
City of Fort Collins & Statewide Jurisdictions
May 2010 '
Jurisdiction Current Codes 2009 I-Codes
IBC IRC IMC IFGC IECC 2009 Adoption Sprinkler Adoption
Fort Collins—current 2006 2003 2003 2003 2006
Fort Collins—proposed 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Oct. 2010 January 1, 2013
Arapahoe County 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 Summer/Fall 2010 January 1, 2013
Aurora 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 Spring 2011 TBD
Boulder 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 Spring 2011 TBD
Boulder County 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 Summer/Fall 2010 TBD
Broomfield 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 Summer/Fall 2010 January 1, 2013
Colorado Springs 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 January 2011 TBD
Commerce City 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 Summer 2010 TBD
Denver 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 Summer 2010 January 1, 2013
Douglas County 2006 1 2006 2006 1 2006 2006 Spring 2011 January 1, 2013
Golden 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Adopted 1/1/2010 January 1, 2013
Greeley 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Adopted 1/1/2010 Janua '1, 2011
Lakewood 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 TBD January 1, 2013
Larimer County 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 Fall 2010 January 1, 2013
Littleton 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Adopted 1/1/2010 Deleted
Longmont 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Adopted 1/4/10 January 1, 2013
Loveland 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 Spring 2011 TBD
Parker 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Adopted 1/1/2010 January 1, 2013
Thornton 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 Fall 2010 January 1, 2013
Westminster 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 Summer 2010 January 1, 2013 y
Windsor 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2012 Editions January 1, 2013 �i
Y
Key: IBC International Building Code; IRC International Residential Code; IMC International Mechanical Code; IFGC International Fuel-Gas Code; n
IECC International Energy Conservation Code.TBD: To Be Determined,2009 I-Codes adopted Bold
For data on jurisdictions,staff utilized the database from International Code Council web site: http://www.iccsafe.org/government/adoption M
z
N
ATTACHMENT 3A
Planning, Development & TranIsportation Services
CityOf Community Development&Neighborhood Services
7 ,v,vpp��►► 281 North College Avenue
®rt Collins P.O.Box580
Fort Collins,CO 80522.0580
970.416.2740
970.224.6134-fax
fcgov.com
Fort Collins City Council
July 13, 2010
Introduction for Adoption:
2009 International Building Code (IBC)
2009 International Residential Code (IRC)
2009 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
2009 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
Significant Changes in the 2009 International Codes
Code Items Bold
Staff commentary in italics
2009 International Building Code (IBC)
(Minimum construction Standards for all commercial and multi-family buildings)
1. Improved definitions of various occupancy/use' groups. (Proper occupancy
classification is the plan reviewer's starting point for all subsequent code requirements.)
2. All commercial buildings required to have emergency responder radio coverage
throughout the building. (References the Fire Code, providing better radio coverage
within large buildings.)
3. Additional exit stairways and smoke control systems in High-Rise buildings.
(Requires one additional stairway above the minimum number of exits.)
4. Luminous markings at stairs and handrails in High-Rise buildings. (Tape markings
which help to locate stairs and handrails in total darkness.)
5. Requirements for "Live/Work" units. (Home occupation business requirements for
employees and customers.)
6. Specific requirements for Ambulatory Health Care facilities. (Addressing patient's
safety and exiting while incapacitated for short periods during procedures.)
7. Fire rated walls are to be identified and labeled with fire rating. (Notifies remodelers
of fire rating.)
8. Requirements for Spray-Applied Fire-Resistant Materials. (Building departments
now have a referenced standard of how proper applications should be applied.)
9. Combustible decks on multi-family buildings now required to be protected by fire
sprinkler. (Addresses multi family and outdoor cooking.) l
2009 1-Codes
Significant Changes
10. Fire-sprinkler pump rooms now required to be fire rated. (Protects the fire sprinkler
systems'pump rooms during a large fire event)
11. Accessible "Areas of Refuge" space including two-way communication.required in
large buildings. (Provides a safe area for persons with disabilities who can not
evacuate by way of stairs or elevators, locally required above 4 stories.)
12. Special locking egress devices allowed in certain types of nursing homes providing
increased security for patients. (Maintains safe emergency exiting while limiting
movement ofpatients with diseases such as Alzheimer's.)
13. Improvements to guard rail heights where fixed seating is next to a raised deck or
balcony edge. (Requires higher guard rails behind fixed seating on raised deck areas,
preventing children from falling over the guard should they stand on the seat.)
14. Accessibility improvements to courtrooms. (Provides wheelchair access to all areas of
a courtroom)
15.Accessibility improvements to reach ranges at lavatories. (Faucet controls upfront
on one lavatory in restrooms with six or more lavatories.)
16. Numerous changes improving overall building stability against various loads such
as wind and snow. References to updated standards improving over-sight of
concrete, steel, masonry and wood construction, including log structures.
Note: The number of proposed amendments to the 2009 IBC is 54, down from 80.
2009 International Residential Code (IRC)
(Minimum construction standards for single-family, duplex and townhome projects)
1. Improved definitions to help determine number of stories and height of dwellings.
(Important since construction under the IRC is limited to three stories.)
2. Requirements for "Structural Insulated Panels" now in the code. (Building
departments now have installation standards available within the code.)
3. Design standards for log homes now identified and referenced in the code. (Provides
the building department standards to be used in determining spans of logs based on
diameter and length.)
4. Improvements to understanding and constructing of fire walls in relation to
property lines and other structures, including details for door and window, pipe and
duct penetrations of fire walls. (Provides clarity when constructing fire walls intended
to protect buildings from neighboring structures)
5. New requirements for guard rails behind fixed seats and benches along raised decks
and balcony edges. (Requires higher guard rails behind fixed seating on raised deck
areas, preventing children from falling over the guard should they stand on the seat.)
6. New requirements that all single family homes shall be provided with fire-
suppressions systems. (Colorado jurisdictions in conjunction with the Colorado Fire
Marshals recommend extending this requirement from an effective date of January 2011
to January 2013 allowing the State Plumbing Board time to craft appropriate legislation
regulating plumbers installing fire-suppressions systems. Fort Collins agrees and
proposes to postpone this requirement until January 2013.)
7. Carbon monoxide alarms are required in new homes and dwellings with gas
appliances or attached garages. (Similar to State Law.)
- 2 -
2009 1-Codes
Significant Changes
8. Clarification on what types of hangers and connectors are to be used with treated
lumber. (Treated wood chemicals can degrade the nails and bolts, this identifies which
connectors are to be used with which treated materials.)
9. Requirements for "pre-cast" foundation systems now being used in dwellings.
(Precast concrete is new to residential buildings; the code has now included these
standards.)
10. Requirements for steel framing systems now being used in residential homes. (Light-
gauge steel framing is new to residential buildings; the code has now included these
standards.)
11. Clarifications on placement and materials to be used for effective weather resistive
barriers. (Improved requirements to keep structures dry from the elements.)
12. Energy code aligns with the latest 2009 IECC. (Estimated to be a 12% energy
efficiency improvement over the 2005 Fort Collins Residential Energy Conservation
Code/2006 International Energy Conservation Code.)
13. Requires that solid insulation be installed beneath hydronic floor heating piping
whether installed in floor framing or concrete slab. (Helping to direct the floor heat
upwards.)
14. Introduces IRC Section P2904 as a combination fire-suppression/potable water
supply system for use when providing fire-suppressions systems in new homes effect
proposed date of January 2013. (Combination system includes potable water piping in
conjunction with fire-suppression system where licensed plumbers can install both
systems)(Relates to discussion #6 above.)
15. Numerous changes improving overall building stability against various loads such
as wind and snow. Providing increased over-sight requirements of concrete, steel,
masonry and wood construction, including log structures.
Note: The number of proposed amendments to the 2009 IRC is 90, down from 135.
2009 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
(Minimum standards for commercial and multi-family mechanical air-handling systems)
1. New requirements regulating temporary heating systems, typically used on
construction sites. (Addressing gas lines, equipment and location.)
2. Clarification on access to equipment for servicing. (Attic and crawl space hatches now
must be large enough to remove the entire appliance not just pieces.)
3. Sizing requirements for condensate drain lines from multiple air conditioning units.
(Pipe must be large enough to handle the condensate from all attached equipment.)
4. Clarifications for calculating the minimum fresh air required to be supplied to
occupied spaces by the mechanical system. (Calculate using the breathable area, using
the room's cubic volume from 2 feet off the floor to 6 feet high verses total room volume
method.)
5. Changes to electric dryer duct lengths allowing 35 feet to termination point.
(Increase in length from 25 ft.)
6. Allows for common exhaust shaft and fan system to accommodate exhausting of
numerous clothes dryers in multi-story buildings. (System helps resolve multi-story
dryer venting issues.)
- 3 -
2009 I-Codes
Significant Changes
7. Clarifies requirements for commercial kitchen grease duct enclosure clearances
from combustibles and access locations for cleaning of ducts. (Code is recognizing
products other than frame and sheetrock to provide afire-rated duct enclosure.)
8. Requires that rigid insulation be installed beneath hydronic floor heating piping
whether installed in floor framing or concrete slab. (Helping to direct the floor heat
upwards.)
9. Establishes combustion air requirements for solid fuel appliances. (Wood stoves need
to be provided with adequate fresh air.)
10. Requirements for locking caps at access ports on refrigeration equipment lines.
(Intended to lessen the loss of refrigerants into the atmosphere.)
Note: Local amendments only to address climatic designs specific to Fort Collins and references
to administration sections of the adopted Building Code.
2009 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGQ
(Minimum standards for commercial and multi-family natural gas or propane appliances or
equipment)
1. Improves requirements for appliance access when installed in attics or crawlspaces.
(The access opening must be large enough to remove the entire appliance, not just
pieces.)
2. Clarifies requirements for gas pipe installations under buildings or under concrete
slabs. (Provides clear directions for how to run gas lines under buildings while allowing
for occupant notification in case of a leak.)
3. Clarifies the use and installation of flexible gas piping and manifold piping systems.
(Building departments now have the standards available incorporated within the code
verses searching for manufacturer's recommendations.)
4. Changes to gas dryer exhaust duct lengths allowing 35 feet to termination point.
(Increase from 25 ft.)
Note: Local amendments only to address climatic designs specific to Fort Collins and references
to administration sections of the adopted Building Code.
2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECQ
(Minimum standards for Commercial and Residential energy requirements) `
Commercial
Ft. Collins currently requires that commercial buildings comply with the American Society of
Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (ASHRAE 90.1-2007). ASHRAE
90.1-2007 is equivalent to the proposed 2009 IECC in most aspects.
2009 IECC increases the R-Value of insulation in walls in metal buildings from R-13 to R-
13 w/continuous R-5.6.
- 4 -
2009 I-Codes
Significant Changes
Residential
(Single-family energy code is currently a prescriptive local amendment in its entirety)
1. Replaces local amendment with national standard using 2009 IECC residential chapter.
(Removes confusion for the construction industry.)
2. Increases wall insulation minimums. (From R-15 to R-20.)
3. Increases insulation in floors above unconditioned spaces such as bedrooms over
garages. (From R-19 to R-30)
4. Requires a programmable thermostat. (Replacing the standard on-off type for better
control of heating and cooling.)
5. Requires air handling system's ductwork to be tested for tightness. (HVAC efficiency
is benefitted when the ducts are leak free delivering the air to the intended room or
space.)
6. Requires that 50% of the dwellings fixed lighting use high efficacy lighting. (Results
in more use of compact f uorescent or low voltage lighting.)
Note:Approximately 10 amendments to the IECC are needed to address climatic designs specific
to Fort Collins and references to administration sections of the adopted Building Code.
- 5 -
ATTACHMENT 3B
Planning, Development & Transportation Services
CI}�0 r Community Development&Neighborhood Services
�®`�� Collins North College Avenue
P.O.P. Box 580
Fort Collins,CO 80522.0580
_ 970.416.2740
970.224.6134-fax
fcgov.com
Fort Collins City Council
July 13, 2010
Introduction for Adoption:
2009 International Building Code (IBC)
2009 International Residential Code (IRC)
2009 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
2009 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
Significant Local Amendments to the proposed 2009 I-Codes
Amendment Items Bold
Staff commentary in italics
Fort Collins' amendments which are new to this code cycle are identified as (NE99; all other
items are amendments from previous codes and have been retained from past adoptions.
2009 International Building Code (IBC)
(Minimum construction Standards for all commercial and multi-family buildings)
1. The IBC administrative sections in Chapter 1 contain all references to other codes
such as the Land Use Code and the Municipal Code. IBC Chapter 1 also contains all
administrative sections addressing permit fees, building code violations, permit
transfers, permit expirations, and Board of Appeals process.
(NE99 With this adoption, each of the remaining proposed 2009 I-Codes reference the
2009 IBC for this administration information reducing the number of local amendments
necessary for the remaining codes.
2. (NE6i9 Building permits are now required for decorative ponds which can contain
water deeper than 24 inches. If permit is required than protection barriers, similar to
swimming pools, are required in residential projects, multi family and single-family. Not
addressed in 09 IBC.
3. Definitions added that are found in the Land Use Code such as, dwelling, dwelling
unit and family.
2009 I-Codes
Significant Local Amendments
4. (NE99 Dwelling units that contain an office which is less than twenty percent of the
area of the dwelling shall not be considered as Live/Work Units Live/Work Units are
commonly referred to as home-occupation business. The 09 IBC limits the office area to
only ten percent of the dwelling area before the Live/Work Unit requirements such as
wheelchair accessibility are applicable.
5. Mezzanines within dwelling units may be equal to one-half the area of the room
below. The 09 IBC limits the mezzanine to one-third the area of the room below.
6. Commercial buildings are to be provided with fire-suppression systems (sprinklers)
or are to be subdivided into fire-rated areas of no more than 5,000 square feet, "fire-
containment" requirements. The concept of Fire-Containment is just now addressed in
09 IBC but the square footage is very much greater.
7. (NE99 Group M, Mercantile businesses which sell furniture shall be provided with
a fire-suppression system if the total business area exceeds 5,000 square feet. The 09
IBC would require afire-suppression system in any size furniture store, even the general
merchandise store that has a single couch for sale.
8. Smoke alarms and carbon monoxide alarms required in all dwelling units and in all
dwellings undergoing remodel work which requires a permit. Smoke alarms are
addressed only in new construction under 09 IBC, Carbon monoxide alarms are not
addressed in 09 IBC
9. Fire-protected wheelchair spaces known as "areas of refuge" required in buildings
over four stories in height. 09 IBC exempts these areas of refuge in buildings containing
fire-suppression system regardless of the number of stories.
10. Exterior slabs, stairs, walks and patios are to be permanently secured in place to
prevent movement caused by soil settlement.Not addressed in 09 IBC.
11. Dwelling units may have one 12 inch step at an exterior door, other than at the main
front door. 09 IBC requires a 36 inch landing. Difficult to comply with small patios in
multi family projects.
12. Below grade window wells can be of the stepped type and use landscape timbers.
Includes details of construction. Stepped window wells not addressed in 09 IBC.
13. References to the latest accessibility standards published by American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) and the accessibility requirements found in Colorado
State Law.
14. All exposed soils under buildings (crawlspaces) shall be covered with an approved
vapor retarder. Not addressed in 09 IBC
15. Radon resistant construction required in all multi-family projects, includes full
installation details.Not addressed in 09 IBC.
- 2 -
2009 I-Codes
Significant Local Amendments
16. All new roof coverings to be Class A (highest degree of fire resistance) fire rated. 09
IBC allows a Class C fire rating
17. Establishes minimum wind speed and snow load to be used in the structural design
of all buildings.
18. All walls located within the bathtub and shower enclosure and extending
horizontally 48 inches from the edge of the tub is a zone requiring safety glazing for
all glass installed in this area. 09 IBC safety zone stops at the tub edge.
19. Requires touch-free controls and touch-free exiting in restrooms of food service
establishments. Not addressed in 09 IBC
2009International Residential Code (IRC)
(Minimum construction standards for single-family, duplex and townhome projects)
1. References the proposed IBC for all administrative provisions addressing permits,
fees, inspections, and violations.
2. (NE99 Building permits are now required for decorative ponds which can contain
water deeper than 24 inches. If a permit is required than protection barriers, similar to
swimming pools, are required in residential projects, multi family and single-family. Not
addressed in 09 IRC
3. Permit number and address numbers are to be clearly visible from the street during
construction.Not addressed in 09 IRC.
4. A site grading performance plan, addressing proper drainage, and construction
details showing exterior wall weather proofing techniques must be submitted with
applications for new homes.Not addressed in 09 IRC.
5. A site survey or improvement location certificate is required prior to issuance of the
certificate of occupancy.Not addressed in 09 IRC.
6. Exterior walls must be constructed as fire-rated walls when located closer than 3
feet to the property line. The 09 IRC requires fire-rated walls when located 5 feet and
less from the property line..
7. Walls separating attached dwelling units shall be of 2-hour fire rating if the building
is not provided with a fire-suppression system. 09 IRC allows one-hour fire rated
walls but requires fire-suppressions systems in all new homes starting January 1, 2011.
8. Below grade window wells can be of the stepped type and use landscape timbers.
Includes details of construction. Stepped window wells not addressed in 09 IRC.
9. Stairs shall have a minimum riser of 4 inches.Not addressed in 09 IRC.
- 3 -
2009 I-Codes
Significant Local Amendments
10. (NER9 Fire-suppressions systems required in all new dwellings effective January 1,
2013, or at a later time as administered by the building official. 09 IRC establishes
the effective date as January ], 2011.
11. Guardrails required around area wells or window wells when there is an intended
walking surface within 36 inches of the well.Not addressed in 09 IRC
12. References to State Law regarding compliance with accessible dwelling units.
13. Requires that all foundations be designed by a professional engineer.
14. Requires that landscape irrigation be placed a minimum of 60 inches from the
exterior of the building.Not addressed in 09 IRC.
15. Requires that all under building exposed dirt be covered with a vapor retarder. Not
addressed in 09 IRC.
16. Requires that crawlspace mechanical ventilation systems, installed to reduce
moisture, be designed by an engineer. Not addressed in 09 IRC.
17. Requires a roof drain system and that downspouts extend at least 50 inches from
the exterior wall. Not addressed in 09 IRC.
18. Requires roof covering materials to be Class A (highest degree of fire resistance) fire
rated. 09 IRC allows Class C fire rating
19. (NE99 Requires roof flashing in locations not previously required.
20. Establishes climatic design parameters used in sizing heating and cooling systems.
21. Mechanical duct systems shall be kept free of construction debris. Not addressed in
09 IRC.
22. Openings used to convey fresh air to gas fired equipment shall be labeled as
combustion air ducts.Not addressed in 09 IRC.
23. Deletes all references to "ventless" gas appliances. 09 IRC allows certain appliances to
be installed without combustion by-products being vented to the outside.
24. Exhaust vents shall not terminate within 36 inches of an opening into the buildings.
25. Requires that kitchens with gas ovens be provided with an exhaust system vented to
the outside.Not addressed in 09 IRC.
26. Requires a passive radon reduction system to be installed in all dwellings.
- 4 -
2009 I-Codes
Significant Local Amendments
2009 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
(Minimum standards for commercial and multi-family mechanical air-handling systems)
1. References the proposed IBC for all administrative provisions addressing permits,
fees, inspections, and violations.
2. Requires that wood framed cavities used to convey air from the mechanical system
shall be tested for air tightness.Not addressed in 09 IMC.
3. Requires that mechanical air handling ductwork be free from construction debris.
Not addressed in 09 IMC.
4. References the State Law for requirements around solid fuel burning appliances.
5. Deletes all references to Unvented Appliances.
2009 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
(Minimum standards for commercial and multi-family natural gas or propane appliances or
equipment)
1. References the proposed IBC for all administrative provisions addressing permits,
fees, inspections, and violations.
2. Gas piping installed above ground shall be supported at least 6 inches above
ground. 09 IFGC allows 4 inches.
3. Gas lines buried below grade without a concrete cover shall be at least 18 inches
deep. 09 IFGC allows just 12 inches of ground cover.
4. Gas lines installed for future appliances shall be provided with a shutoff valve and
end cap. 09 IFGC only requires the end cap.
5. Requires that vents for gas regulators can not terminate within 36 inches of an
exterior opening. Not addressed in 09 IFGC.
6. Deletes all references to Unvented Room Heaters. 09 IFGC allows certain unvented
appliances.
7. Requires that kitchens with gas ovens be provided with an exhaust system vented to
the outside.Not addressed in 09 IFGC.
2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECQ
(Minimum standards for Commercial and Residential energy requirements)
- 5 -
2009 I-Codes
Significant Local Amendments
1. References the proposed IBC for all administrative provisions addressing permits,
fees, inspections, and violations.
2. Establishes climatic design parameters used in sizing heating and cooling systems.
3. Requires that air handling ducts located in attics be insulated to an R-8 minimum.
09 IECC does not make this a mandatory requirement but only prescriptive.
4. Requires a minimum R-10 insulation around concrete slabs of conditioned spaces in
all buildings.Not required for commercial buildings in 09 IECC.
- 6 -
ATTACHMENT 4
Adoption of Residential Sprinkler Requirements
September 25, 2009
Revised 11/17/09—Appendix A
Joint Ad-Hoc Residential Sprinkler Committee
Guidance Document
I\ILA\lllu\\I \I't q
I PPi 1 PI\i II psd� T,yO
?r
W
_Q 7
1-
r Q
O
f
Adoption of Residential Sprinkler Requirements
November 17, 2009
Page 2 of 7
Purpose
The purpose of this document is to provide guidance to local jurisdictions contemplating
the adoption of the residential sprinkler requirements found in the 2009 International
Residential Code (IRC). These recommendations are based on discussions with
numerous stakeholders as part of the efforts of the Joint Ad-Hoc Residential Sprinkler
Committee ("Committee"). They are intended to provide uniformity in code adoptions
and help to remove barriers to successful implementation.
The primary focus of these recommendations is to introduce fire sprinklers into
communities that have never contemplated them before and to provide enough
incentives to gain their commitment during the adoption process. For those
communities that already have residential sprinkler ordinances, they are encouraged to
contemplate the new philosophies and options found in the IRC and continue to
maintain or further improve their community's level of safety.
Background
The 2009 IRC includes provisions that require all new one- and two-family dwellings
and townhouses to be protected by a fire sprinkler system. If adopted with no
amendments, the requirement for townhouses would be immediate and the requirement
for one- and two-family dwellings would be effective on January 1, 2011. In anticipation
of the adoption of these requirements, the Fire Marshal's Association of Colorado and
the Colorado Chapter of the International Code Council formed the Joint Ad-Hoc
Residential Sprinkler Committee. The goal of the Committee is to gain acceptance of
residential sprinklers and remove the barriers that would prevent their wide-spread,
cost-effective, efficient, and quality installation.
Many barriers have been identified and the Committee has divided into three
subcommittees (education, legislation, and technical) to begin addressing them. Some
of the major barriers that appear to be affecting the local adoption process include:
• Decision-makers do not fully understand how sprinklers work and the value of
their installations.
• The housing market is in a significant decline and any new requirements that
increase home costs may further challenge the market's recovery.
• There are existing developments in progress that have insufficient infrastructure
(e.g., water meters, taps, pipe size, etc.) to accommodate sprinklers.
• Water purveyor concerns need to be addressed in order to reduce costs and
improve ease of installation. These entities are also often in possession of many
incorrectly-sized water meters and it may take some time/funding to replace them
in preparation for sprinkler systems.
Adoption of Residential Sprinkler Requirements
November 17, 2009
Page 3 of 7_
• Legislation needs to be enacted that will streamline regulation, recognize the
various methods of system installation introduced by the IRC, encourage cost
reduction, and maintain quality.
• Any new rules introduced by legislation need to be implemented with time for
associated education and certifications for installers and inspectors.
It is important for city councils and other adopting bodies to understand how residential
sprinklers work, the various stakeholder concerns, and the efforts of the Committee to
address those concerns and make the adoption of sprinkler requirements a success.
The Committee also needs to be sensitive to the housing market and its impact on local
jurisdictions, as well as the time it will take to remove barriers that have a direct impact
on the cost of sprinkler systems. Therefore, the Committee recommends the following
uniform approach to the adoption process.
Recommendation
1. Encourage the adoption of the 2009 IRC, including the requirements for residential
sprinklers and Section P2904.
o Now is the time for decision-makers and the citizens to learn about sprinklers
and commit to their mandatory installation.
2. Amend the IRC to have an effective date of January 1, 2013 for the installation of
sprinklers in both one-and two-family dwellings and towhhouses•
o One- and two-family dwellings and townhouses should be treated the same,
as they are presented with the same implementation challenges.
o Moving the effective date to 2013 will provide time for the many barriers to be
addressed and provide sprinkler opponents with one more opportunity to
remove the sprinkler requirements during the 09/10 ICC code development
process (i.e., preparation of the 2012 IRC). While the Committee is confident
that the sprinkler requirements will remain, a final determination will be made
in late 2010.
3. Amend IRC Section R302.2 (exception) to ensure the fire-resistance rating of the
wall assembly separating townhouses is only reduced when a sprinkler system is
installed.
o The existing exception was added based on the assumption that all new
townhouses would be protected by sprinklers upon adoption of the IRC.
Since Committee Recommendation #2 recommends a delay in the effective
date for townhouse sprinklers, it is appropriate to also ensure that any code
reductions do not apply until the sprinklers are installed.
4. Amend the IRC to exempt existing developments (or portions of developments) that
are already in progress or substantially completed, where the infrastructure has
already been installed and is inadequate for sprinkler design.
i
Adoption of Residential Sprinkler Requirements
November 17, 2009
Page 4 of 7
o The primary concern is the size of the domestic water mains and water
meters that have already been installed for the development. If they are too
small, then there may be a significant cost to upgrading this infrastructure.
The philosophy would be to exempt the subdivision since the code of record
under which it was designed did not contemplate sprinklers.
o Any new developments, or future phases/filings of existing developments, that
have not started site preparation would not be exempt and would have ample
time to prepare the necessary infrastructure.
5, Amend International Fire Code Section 102.5(1) to reflect the actual scope of the
IFC with respect to residential sprinkler permits.
o As written, this section of the IFC would require a sprinkler permit to be
Issued by the fire department for all residential sprinkler systems. This may
or may not be true, depending on the how the local building and fire
department will address the plan review, permit and inspection processes.
This may be further defined by the type of sprinkler system design (hydraulic,
pipe-schedule) and the associated design standard (NFPA 13D, IRC P2904).
State regulation may also vary based on similar criteria. Therefore, when
adopting this section of the IFC, some flexibility should be incorporated into
the amendment to recognize other entities that also regulate residential
sprinklers.
6. Avoid local amendments that increase the number of requirements or processes
needed to install sprinkler systems.
o Building and fire departments are encouraged to work together to determine
the most appropriate administrative processes that result in reduced costs
and time delays.
o Residential sprinklers are intended to provide life safety-to occupants and
control the spread of the fire until suppression personnel arrive. Additional
design, installation, and maintenance requirements beyond those of national
standards should be pursued cautiously to avoid unnecessary cost increases.
It is also recognized, however, that certain trade-offs and additional
requirements may be necessary to address access, water supply, response
time, local staffing levels, or other suppression capability challenges.
o Ultimately, it is hoped that the design and installation of residential sprinklers
in one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses will be simplified and
require minimal review and permitting prior to installation. This is a shift in
philosophy for most AHJ's, but needs to be considered in order to make the
transition to low-cost, high-production systems.
Conclusion
The Committee recommends adopting the 2009 IRC, but with a delayed effective date
for residential sprinklers. That way, the commitment to residential sprinklers will be
Adoption of Residential Sprinkler Requirements
November 17, 2009
Page 5 of 7
clearly stated and captured in the adopting .ordinance. In the meantime, efforts will
continue to make necessary legislative changes, train personnel, reduce system costs,
and gain more acceptance for wide-spread residential sprinkler system installation.
Adoption of Residential Sprinkler Requirements
November 17, 2009
Page 6 of 7
Appendix A
Participating Members
Andy Walsh Westminster
Becky Baker Jefferson Count
Beck O'Guin South Metro
Ben Greene Englewood
Bob Leigh Aurora
Brenda Bronson Fire Protection Engineer
Carol Gill-Mulson Eagle River
Chad McCollum Thornton
Chris Allison Longmont
Craig Wiseman Western States Fire Protection
Dan Stanek Eagle County
Dalyl Kui er CO Board of Plumbers _
David Lowrey Boulder
David Nuss NFPA
Debra Thorson Denver
Don Wyman Denver Water
Doreen Withee Colorado Springs
_
Doug Hall Westminster
Technical Chair
Ed Van Walraven Aspen
Gerry George CO Chapter, ICC
Committee Co-Chair Golden
Greg Wheeler Thornton
Legislative Chair
Janine Snyder Frisco
Jeff Dorrell North Metro
Jerry Stricker Golden
Keith Brown North Metro
Keith Dix West Metro
Ken Swanson Castle Rock
Kim Calomino HBA Denver
Maria Figueroa NFPA
Marie Bassett Denver Water Q
Mark Wassom Division of Fire Safety
Matt Archer Douglas Count
Mike Dell'Orfano FMAC
Committee Co-Chair South Metro
Pam Kutchen North Metro
Paul Cooke CO State Fire Chiefs
Rick Mendez Castle Rock
Rita Neiderheiser Sprinkler Fitters Local 669
RJ Dussart Fire Protection En ineer
Rob Geislin�r South Metro
Robert Nanfelt HBA Colorado
Ron Biggers Glenwood Springs
Scott Pribble Arvada
Education Chair
Adoption of Residential Sprinkler Requirements
November 17, 2009
Page 7 of 7
Spark Sparky Shriver Arvada
Steve Gasowski Division of Fire Safety
Steve Skulski Lake Dillon
Terry Gruber Douglas Count
Terry Phillips NFSA .
Tim Pate Broomfield
Tom Coakley Western State Fire Protection
Tom Kaufman Durango
Tom Maimberg Denver Water
Tom Meyers Colorado Code Consultants
Tracey Taylor Fire&Life Safely Educators of CC
South Metro _
Woody Percival Pueblo
ATTACHMENT 45
Cost Comparison Estimates for Residential Dwellings
Current 2005 Fort Collins Residential Energy Code verses 2009 International Energy Conservation Code IECC
Item Current Energy Code 2009 IECC 2009 IECC
2x4 Framing 2x4 Framing 2x6 Framing
R-15 minimum R-20 Minimum or SPA R-20 Minimum
w192%Efficient Furnace w/92%Efficient Furnace w192%Efficient Furnace
*Baseline Sample Home Systems Approach Component Approach
Prescri five Performance (SPA Prescriptive
1 Frame Wall Cost $1,500 $1,500 $2,500
2 Jamb Increases $0 $0 $1,000
3 Wall Insulation R-15 Fiberglass Batts R-15 Blown-in R-21 Fiberglass Batts
4 Basement wall insulation None R-11 Blanket (Required)- R-11 Blanket (Required)
5 Insulation cost $2,300 $4,046 (75%Increase) $2,633 (14%Increase)
6 SPA Rater $0 $525.00 $0
7 High Efficacy Lighting $0. (N/A) $100.00 (Required) $100.00 (Required)
8 Totals $39800.00 $6,171.00 $6,233.00
($2,371.00 Increase) ($2,433.00 Increase)
9 Energy Annual Cost $1,579.00 $11477.00 $1,518.00
(Energy Gauge software) (7%Decrease approx.) (4% Decrease approx.)
10 Energy Monthly Cost $131.58 $123.08 $126.50
(Energy Gauge software) ($8.50/month savings approx.) ($5.08/month savings approx.)
I 1 Mortgage Estimate $805.00/month @ $150,000 $817.96/month @ $152,371 $818.29 @ $152,433
(Principal and interest)
12 Energy & Mortgage
MonthlyTotals $936.58/month $941.04/month $944.79/month -
y
*Baseline Sample Home: 2,000 square foot,2 stories, 1,000 square foot unfinished basement. Base price: $150,000.00 @ 5%/30 Year Fixed,
Principal & Interest=$805.00/month(provided by on-line Mortgage Calculator)
Insulation &energy cost estimates provided by Energy Rater paul.hi ip nanamascocs.com using"Rim-Rate" software from ICC approved Z
Residential Energy Service Network(RESNET). 1
ATTACHMENT 6A
Nudm re Fire Prevention Bureau
Phone:970-221-6570
� y ry° 102 Remington Street Fax:970-221-6635
Authority
y yI LI. ®A lty Fort Collins,CO 80524 Internet:www.poudmilip-org
J
To: Mike Gebo,Chief Building Official
From: Kevin Wilson,Fire Marsh
Date: May 27,2010
Re: Residential Fire Sprinklers
In response to your request for verifiable information about the value of residential fire sprinklers,
I am providing the following information in brief.
Before I provide the national data supporting the common sense use of residential sprinklers, let
me provide a quick review on a local level. We have in excess of 300 residential fire sprinkler
systems in the PFA. In 2009 we had four fires in the residential environment. In two of these
events, sprinklers activated as intended, providing for safe exit of occupants and significant
reduction of fire loss. One fire was too small and the fire was extinguished by the occupant. The
fourth fire was an exterior fire that burned from the outside into the house,but quickly grew in
size overrunning the sprinkler system and destroying the property.
Some significant fact regarding residential fire sprinklers:
• The residential fire problem in the U.S.results in nearly 3,000 fire deaths annually.
• Residential fires present the greatest risk to firefighters due to frequency,delay hi
notification,and lack of building familiarity.
• Workin smoke alarms reduce the risk of dying in a fire by 50%,fire sprinklers
reduce this risk by 80%.
• 90%of the time the fire is exthtguishcd by one fire sprinkler.
• Only the sprinkler closest to the fire activates.
• . Newer homes are just as likely to catch fire as older homes.
• Lightweight construction of newer homes present greater risk to firefighters.
• Fire damage in fire sprinklered houses is 40-701/o lower than in non-sprinklered
houses. •
• 95%of fires in sprinklered houses are confined to room of origin vs.75%in non-
sprinklered houses.
• One fire sprinkler flows less than 15 gallons of water per minute,while a single fire
hose will flow up to 150 gallons per minute.
PFA supports the 2009 IRC as.proposed with the residential sprinkler effective date of January 1,
2013.
Should you need more detailed information or added explanation, I would be most happy to
provide it for you.
ATTACHMENT 611 l
FIRE SPRINKLER INITIATIVE
Brinpng &&t- Home
NFPA'
FIRE SPRINKLER INITIATIVE: BRINGING SAFETY HOME
Fires in the home pose one of the biggest threats to the people of your community.
Nearly 400,000 home fires occur every year in this country and nearly 3,000 people a
year die in these home fires. Home fire sprinklers are a proven way to protect lives
and property against fires at home.
These life-saving systems respond quickly and effectively to the presence of a nearby fire,
When sprinklers are present,they save lives.
• If you have a reported fire in your home,the risk of dying decreases by about 80 portent when
sprinklers are present.
• People in homes with sprinklers are protected against
significant property loss—sprinklers reduce th6 average
property loss by 74 percent per fire. FACTSABOUT
Model safety codes now require the use of home fire U.S. HOME STRUCTURE FIRES
sprinklers in new one-and two-family homes.These _ departments responded
requirements offer the highest level of safety to protect the an estimated 386,600 home structure
people of your community. fires In 2008.
• Home sprinkler systems respond quickly to reduce the
heat,flames,and smoke from a fire,giving families These fires caused:
valuable time to get to safety. * 2,766 civilian fire deaths
• Roughly 90 percent of the time,just one sprinkler * 13,160 civilian fire Injuries
operates. e $8.2 billion In direct
• Each individual sprinkler is designed and calibrated to
go off when it senses a significant heat change, Roughly 83 percent of all civilian fire
• Only the sprinkler closest to the-fire will activate, deaths ' `
spraying water directly on the fire. structure fires.
On
FACTS ABOUT THE COST OF HOME FIRE U.S.home fires.
SPRINKLERS
The Fire Protection Research Foundation recently issued the Fire Loss In the United States during 200a
Home Fire Sprinkler Cost Assessment report.The report by Michael J.Karter,Jr.,NFPA,Quincy,
reveals that the cost of installing home fire sprinklers MA,August 2009
averages$1.61 per square foot for new construction. Home Structure Fires by Marty Ahrens,
Installing home fire sprinklers can: NFPA,Quincy,
• Reduce property loss in the event of fire
• Cut homeownerAnsurance premiums
• Help qualify a home for a tax rebate
►�l The Fire Sprinklertnitiative®,a project of the National Fire Protection Association,is a nationwide effort to
encourage the use of home fire sprinklers and the adoption of fire sprinkler requirements for new construction-
NFPA *Data referenced from NFPA, the Home Fire Sprinkler Coalition, and other sources.
fh'oayrinkh•rmitialivi .nr
A FIRE SPRINKLER INITIATIVE
Brin(ring- Safety Henze �Y
NFPA
i
The Case for Home Fire Sprinklers
The mission of the international nonprofit NFPA,established in 1896,is to reduce the worldwide burden of fire and other
hazards on the quality of life by providing and advocating consensus codes and standards,research,training,and education.
This document is to support the adoption of fire sprinkler requirements in new homes,to provide important information about
home fires sprinklers,and to clarify key NFPA statistics that may hove been used out of context by home fire sprinkler
opponents.
Home fire is a major problem In the U.S.
Fire in the home poses one of the biggest threats to the people of your community.Nearly 3,000 people per year die In U.S.
home fires.Congressional hearings have been scheduled and pandemics have been declared on the basis of much smaller
death tolls than the home fire death toll.Most people to not believe that we are safe enough or that current death tolls from ,
home fires are acceptable.
Smoke alarms and sprinklers both save lives from fire
Home fire sprinklers are a proven way to protect lives and property against fires at home.These live-saving systems respond
quickly and effectively to the presence of a nearby fire.When sprinklers are present,they save lives.Sprinkler systems
provide additional benefits,on top of the benefits already provided by smoke alarms.
• working smoke alarms cut the risk of dying in a home fire by 50 percent.
• If you have a reported fire in your home,the risk of dying decreases by about 80 percent when sprinklers are
present.
Beware misleading percentages on survival and death
Fire sprinkler opponents have been using a statistic of 99.45 percent to illustrate the effectiveness of smoke alarms in
reducing home fire deaths.This NFPA statistic estimates the likelihood of surviving as home fire when a working smoke alarm
Is present.Taken completely out of context,a number like 99.45 percent sounds very high.But consider this:
• The total home fire death toll of roughly 3,000 deaths a year occurs in roughly 400,000 reported home fires a year.
Therefore,the likelihood of surviving a home fire is over 99 percent without regard to the presence of smoke alarms
or any other fire safety provisions.Does that mean 3,000 deaths are acceptable?Most people would say no.
• Each year,there are an estimated 41,000 deaths due to motor vehicle accidents and an estimated 6 million reported
motor vehicle accidents crashes.The likelihood of surviving a motor vehicle accident crash is 99.4 percent. Does that
mean 41,000 deaths are acceptable?Most people would say no.
• Each year,2.4 million people die of any cause in the country compared to a total U.S.resident population of
300 million.The likelihood of surviving every hazard,threat and illness for a year is 99.2 percent.Does that mean
2.4 million deaths are acceptable—that nothing at all should be done to protect Americans from anything,especially
when technology exists that could save lives?Most people would say no.
Sprinklers do more than save lives
Sprinklers do more than save lives;they also protect property from destruction by fire.In many situations,that means a
family that survived a fire will also have a place to live and enough resources to continue living their lives as they did before.
"Saving Ilves"means more than just preventing deaths.Just as there is no other fire safety technology or program that
produces as great a reduction in risk of death as sprinklers,there also is no other fire safety technology or program that
produces as great a reduction in property loss per fire as sprinklers.
• People in homes with sprinklers are protected against significant property loss—sprinklers reduce the average
property loss by 71 percent per home fire.
The national consensus is in favor of sprinklers
All model safety codes now require the use of home fire sprinklers in new one-and two-family homes.These requirements
offer the highest level of safety to protect the people of your community.
• Home sprinkler systems respond quickly to reduce the heat,flames,and smoke from a fire,giving families valuable
time to get to safety.
• Roughly 90 percent of the time,just one sprinkler operates.
• Each individual sprinkler is designed and calibrated to go off when it senses a significant heat change.
• Only the sprinkler closest to the fire will activate,spraying water directly on the fire.
Beware misleading percentages on effectiveness and reliability
It is important to recognize that home fire sprinkler systems are designed to activate to the heat of a fire that grows large
enough for the temperature to rise to 135'-160°F.They are not activated by smoke,nor should they be.
Opponents have cited some low percentages for what they call fire sprinkler efficiency.Such statistics improperly include as
failures fires that do not produce enough heat to activate the sprinkler system,possibly because they were extinguished
before heat rises to the point of activating the sprinkler system.In home fires deemed large enough to activate an
operational sprinkler,sprinklers operated and were effective in 99 percent of reported fires.
Beware false claims made for newer homes
Opponents of residential fire sprinkler systems like to boast that newer homes are safer homes and that the fire and death
problem is limited to older homes.This statistical claim evaporates if you adjust for the higher risk characteristics(e.g.,lower
income,less education)found on average in the occupants of older homes.But in fact,newer homes are also more likely to
include a threat to firefighters in the form of lightweight construction.Lightweight construction has been variously estimated
to be used in a half to two-thirds of all new wood one-and two-family homes.Sprinklers can offset the increased dangers
posed by lightweight construction and create a safer fire environment for Firefighters to operate.
Home fire sprinklers are cost effective
A national perspective on the cost of installing residential fire sprinklers is examined in the report, Home Fire Sprinkler Cost
Assessment,released by the Fire Protection Research Foundation,an affiliate of NFPA.According to the report,the cost of
installing sprinkler systems averaged$1.61 per sprinklered square foot.This cost includes all costs to the builder associated
with the system including design,installation,and other costs such as permits,additional equipment,increased tap and water
meter fees—to the extent that they apply.
Additionally,in a recent study,Comparative Analysis of Housing Cost and Supply Impacts of Sprinkler Ordinances at the
Community Level,conducted by Newport Partners for NFPA and just released,it is reported that: "the following analysis did
not reveal that the enactment of sprinkler ordinances caused any detrimental effects on housing supply and costs."This
report clearly indicates there is no merit to the claim that a residential sprinkler requirement creates an unfair market
advantage for an area that does not have a requirement,as claimed by sprinkler opponents.
-- ...- ---- ... .. ... ATTACHMENT 7
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
��tt tti.isnrnitit!atiun,cntrt 800-444-4554
RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLERS ISO FACT SHEET
ISO is an independent statistical,rating,and advisory organization that serves the property/casualty
Insurance industry. ISO is the leading supplier of underwriting Information,advisory loss costs.
supplementary rating information and standardized policy language to insurers In all 50 states and the
District of Columbia.ISO offers the following regarding how residential sprinklers are reflected in ISO's
advisory residential property programs'
PREMIUM DISCOUNTS
The standard ISO Dwelling Fire and I lomeowncrs Programs contain available premium
Credits for installation of fire sprinkler protection up to a maximum of:
13%for full sprinkler protection Ihal includes all areas of a home,including attics,bathrooms.
closets.and attached structures.
• 8%for fire sprinkler protection of all areas of a home excluding the attic.bathrooms,closets.and
attached structures as long as fire detection equipment is installed in those areas where sprinklers
are omitted:
Individual insurer programs may provide different credits.
SPRINKLER"LEAKAGE'COVERAGE
The presence of a residential sprinkler syslom may raise concern about the risk of accidental
water leakage from the system. ISO's standard Homeowners policy forms provide coverage for
"...accidental discharge or overflow of water. .from within a...fire protective sprinkler system..."
This coverage is Included in the basic policy.There is no extra charge for this coverage
Also.coverage is provided forwater damage related to the suppression or extinguishment of a covered fire.
Individual insurer programs may provide variations to this coverage-
BUILDING CODE EFFECTIVENESS GRADING SCHEDULE
The ISO Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule(BCEGSVi)is used to review public building code
enforcement agencies and to develop a classification that is provided as advisory information to insurers
who may use it for insurance underwriting and rating.If the requirement of the International Residential
Code(2009)for automatic fire sprinkler protection of residential dwellings was removed by legislation or
local ordinance, BCEGS would not provide full recognition for adoption of code without amendments.A
building code enforcement agency which adopted a code with amendments that weaken hazard mitigation
issues as defined in the model codes and referenced standards would not receive maximum recognition for
code adoption.
i
ATTACHMENT 8
International Code Council
INTERNATIONAL NEWS RELEASE
For Immediate Release Contact: Steve Daggers
Jan. 28, 2009 1-888-ICC-SAFE (422-7233), ext.4212
www.iccsafe.org 1-708-351-8880 (cell)
New energy code expected to be 15% more efficient
The 2009 edition of the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)—the national model
energy code of choice for states, cities and.counties that adopt codes—is published and now available
for adoption by jurisdictions.
The IECC published by the International Code Council is tied to federal law determined by Congress
and the U.S.Department of Energy (DOE)through the Energy Policy Act of 1992. It is the only energy
code that serves as the basis for federal tax credits for energy-efficient homes, energy efficiency
standards for federal residential buildings and manufactured housing, and state energy code
determinations.
Recent legislation passed by the U.S.House of Representatives includes $3.4 billion in energy
assistance grants for states if the International Code Council's 2009 IECC is adopted and administered.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act(HR 1)requires governors who want a share of state
energy assistance grants to certify their state will adopt an energy code for one- and two-family homes,
townhouses and low-rise,multiple-family buildings that meets or exceeds provisions in the 2009 IECC
for residential construction, and the ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007, as referenced in the
2009 IECC for commercial buildings.
The 2009 IECC will produce approximately 15% in energy efficiency gains compared to the 2006
edition, according to DOE.As a result, homes and commercial buildings, including schools and
hospitals built in jurisdictions that adopt the 2009 IECC,will consume less energy and help the
environment by reducing emissions associated with building operation.
A U.S.Department of Energy (DOE) ruling published in the Federal register clears the way for
establishing the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code(IECC)as a safe harbor equivalent to the
ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 Standard. The ruling says the Standard,or equivalents like the 2009
IECC,would achieve greater energy efficiency in commercial buildings compared to previous editions.
Adopted at the state and local level in 39 states and Washington,D.C., the IECC residential and
commercial procedures have a strong following and a well-developed format that is simple to use and
familiar to code officials.To purchase the 2009 IECC and other International Codes,visit
www.icesafe.or2/2009icodes.
New energy efficient provisions in the 2009 IECC include:
• Improved window and skylight efficiencies for homes constructed in"warm humid"and"hot
humid"climates which lower energy costs during cooling periods.
• An increase in insulation R-values for walls, floors and basements in cold climates to achieve
greater heating and cooling savings.
• High-efficiency light bulbs as a requirement in at least 50%of permanent lighting fixtures in
new homes.
• New separate requirements for high-rise condominiums and apartments regarding commercial
insulation and window tables.
• Radiant heating requirements for unenclosed public spaces;
• Clear depiction of mechanical provisions regarding when and where a Demand Control
Ventilation strategy is required.
The International Code Council, a membership association dedicated to building safety and fire
prevention, develops the codes used to construct residential and commercial buildings, including homes
and schools. Most U.S. cities, counties and states choose the International Codes, building safety codes
developed by the International Code Council.
ATTACHMENT # 9
Affordable Housing Board,May 6,2010
Provided general support for the adoption of the proposed 2009 I-Codes
including the energy efficiency improvements but expressed concerns over the
cost increase due to the fire-suppression systems proposed for 2013.
Commission on Disability-May 13,2010
Provided full support for the adoption of the proposed 2009 I-Codes
Air Quality Advisory Board-May 17,2010
Provided support for the adoption of the proposed 2009 I-Codes, requested that
materials off-gassing be looked into during the next adoption process.
Natural Resource Advisory Board-May 19,2010
Provided support for the adoption of the energy code and refrained ,from
addressing codes outside their knowledge base.
Building Review Board-May 27,2010
Provided full support for the adoption of the proposed 2009 I-Codes
Fort Collins Board of Realtors-June 1,2010
Provided support for the adoption of the proposed 2009 I-Codes
Electric Board-June 2,2010
Provided full support for the adoption of the proposed 2009 I-Code
Landmark Preservation Commission-June 9,2010
Provided full support for the adoption of the proposed 2009 I-Code
Water Board-June 17,2010
Provided support for the adoption of the proposed 2009 I-Codes, requested a staff
update prior to the enactment of the residential fire-suppression systems in single
family homes.
Open Public Meeting- June 17,2010
There was.general support for the adoption of the proposed 2009 I-Codes and
they expressed concerns over the cost of the residential fire-suppressions systems.
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
AFFORDABLE HOUSING BOARD
INFORMAL MEETING MINUTES
281 N. College Ave.
Fort Collins, Colorado
July 1, 2010
Ben Blonder,Vice Chair ®����
Ken Waido, Staff Liaison, 970-221-6753
City Council Liaison: Lisa Poppaw
Board Members Present: Ben Blonder, Dan Byers, Marie Edwards, Karen Miller,
Wendie Robinson, Mike Sollenberger
Board Members Absent: None.
Advanced Planning Department Staff Present: Ken Wai egan Bolin
Council Members Present: None.
Other Staff Present: Mike Gebo
Board Vice-Chair Ben Blonder called e meeting to order at 4:06 PM
Open Public Discussion: No
New Business.
Approval of tes of the May 6, 2010 Meeting: Mr. Blonder moved for approval of
the minutes. s. Miller seconded the motion. Waido announced there were no minutes
from the ne 3, 2010 meeting since there was not a quorum, but a summary discussion
of t merview with Donna Merten was prepared.
International Building Code: Mike Gebo was present to answer questions from the
Board before the scheduled July 13, 2010 City Council work session. Board members
asked several questions of Mr. Gebo:
(1) The price of the proposed 2013 sprinkler system installation for a 2,000 s.f.
house. Mr. Gebo responded $2.20 per square foot on a baseline home.
Parts of the basement must also be sprinkled.
(2) The cost of energy improvements for the baseline home. Gebo responded
they are in the $2,300 to $2,400 range, and mortgage payments would
increase approximately $11 per month. Monthly energy savings will offset
that mortgage payment increase by about half.
(3) The reason why the sprinkler system addition needs to be adopted with this
code instead of waiting two years. Gebo replied that the ad hoc committee
proposed to leave it in and simply move it out for adoption in 2013. The
2012 code amendments will probably be out before 2013, and City Council
can review any changes that occurred to that section in 2012.
(4) The statistics that are available on loss of life and damages caused as a result
of fires. Gebo responded that a study prepared by the NFPA for residential
homes for 2008 throughout the country indicated there were 300,000 fires
with 3,000 of those fires resulting in a loss of life. There was no loss of life
in sprinkled homes. The damage sustained was 70% to 80% greater in a
nonsprinkled home than in a sprinkled home.
(5) Can the City provide incentives to the builders to be able to provide the
sprinkler equipment? Waido responded that the City would increase the
typical down payment assistance by the amount of the sprinkler system, but
there is only so much money in the home buyer assistance program and that
per unit increase would lower the number of homes that would be provided
with subsidies.
General discussion ensued regarding comments Mr. Gebo has received from boards and
commissions regarding I-Code approval. Gebo stated that the energy code and its
associated cost increase are supported, but there is concern over the cost of the sprinkler
systems. There was also discussion regarding the $2.20 per square foot installation cost.
One of the Board members commented that they have seen those costs quoted at $1.00 to
$1.50 per square foot. A question was posed as to how the quoted costs could get closer
to that level. Gebo responded that local companies are quoting $2.20 because installation
methods are still not understood. Commercial sprinklers run at about $1.25 per square
foot. Hopefully, with training, those estimated costs will be reduced.
Board members reiterated that adding a $6,000 cost increase to a home purchase would
disqualify a substantial number of potential low income buyers. The Board also
expressed support for all sections of the code but the sprinkler system section. A
memorandum will be prepared by one Board member and then circulated to all Board
members for comments and suggestions.
Green Building Program Update: Felix Lee provided an update on the Green BuildiR
Program. Mr. Lee reviewed progress to date stating they are about 3 o rough the
process. Two models are being used, and a detailed re ing conducted of each
green building practice in the models to ormation for recommendations as to
how to move forward with ea code. Several buildings are being benchmarked
against the model c r. Lee stated that the cost benefit analysis will be available in
the next r so. The projected time schedule is that the development process will
pleted by October or November and then public outreach will occur.
.0000
Commission on Disability
May 13,2010
Page 2
4. New Business (1 hour)
1. Ingrid Decker,Assistant City Attorney(COD by-laws)
Ingrid provided copies of the proposed changes to the COD by-1 to those in
attendance:
Terry Schlicting
Mike Devereaux
Michelle Miller
Karen Perry
Kalin Logan
Mare Franklin-Gaumer
The following received t via e-mail and verified the receipt of same with an e-
mail reply: Sent Reply
Lydia Wiatrows ' 4/12/10 4/26/10
Sam Cavall 4/12/10 4/13/10
Jeffrey n 4/12/10 4/13/10
He ' ueber 4/12/10 4/12/10
omas Klender 4/23/10 4/23/10
Quorum was in attendance and the revisions were accepted unanimously.
2. Mike Gebo,Building Official for COFC
Mike presented a PowerPoint presentation on a new way of meeting building code
specs. This is the first time they are bringing all 5 core codes together in one
submission. There will be an open house for builders and the public to be held on
June 17'h,from 5:00-7:30. It will be held in the community room, located at 215 N.
Mason. This information will be announced in newspapers.
He is asking for the support of the COD when the proposal is ready to go to the City
Council for adoption. •
After many questions and discussion, Mare made a motion to support and Karen
seconded. All members in attendance voted"Aye".
3. Officer elections
Elections were held and the following offices filled for 201
Chair Terry Schlic
Vice-Chair Mi evereaux
Secretary ydia Wiatrowski
Histori Hettie Hueber
AIR QUALITY ADVISORY BOARD .
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
May 17,2010
DATE: Monday, May 18,2010
LOCATION: 215 N. Mason Conference room 1-A
TIME: 5:30-8:00 P.M.
Dinner is served starting at 5:15
For Reference: Eric Levine, Chair - 493-6341
David Roy,Council Liaison - 407-7393
Lucinda Smith, Staff Liaison - 224-6085
In Attendance
Eric Levine,Hugh Mackay,Dennis Georg,Rich Fischer, John Schroeer,Dave Dietrich,Nancy York,
Dale Adamy
Absent
Greg McMaster
Staff Present: Lucinda Smith, Alexis Hmielak
Call meeting to order
Eric Levine called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m..
Introduction of Guests
Mike Gebo
Public Comments
Review and Approval of April 19,2010 Minutes
John Schroeer moved and Rich Fisher seconded a motion to approve the April 19,2010 minutes as
presented.
Motion passed unanimously
International Building Codes
Mike Gebo, Chief Building Official was present at the AQAB meeting tonight to present the 2009
International Building Codes and local amendments he proposes to present to Council for approval and
to ask the board for their input and recommendations
As background,Mike stated new editions of building codes and standards are reviewed every three years
and voted on by construction industry professionals from across the country under the oversight of the
International Code Council(ICQ. This fall the City of Fort Collins proposes to adopt,with local
amendments, the ICC's latest publication which is an interconnected series of construction standards
called the 2009 International Codes set. This is the first time the codes will be interconnected and
adopted as a package.
• Mike pointed out that the City's I-Code committee has been reviewing the 2009 Codes and
establishing local amendments since their publication earlier this year. In April, 2010, they voted
unanimously to support the adoption of these codes. Mike Gebo is visiting various boards and
commissions that might be affected by these codes for their input and recommendations before he
goes before City Council for their consideration on July 27.
o The I-Code review committee felt it was important to limit local amendments to promote the
construction industry throughout Colorado.
o The purpose of the updates are to protect life, health and safety and to establish minimum
construction standards for all builders. They also incorporated the latest advances in
construction as a result of current events and newly-approved products and systems.
• Mike presented the history of building codes, an overview of the five 2009 International Codes,
significant changes from previous codes and proposed local amendments. He previously sent the
AQAB a hard copy of the details of this information. The codes being reviewed are:
0 2009 International Building Code(IBC)
0 2009 International Residential Code(IRC)
0 2009 International Mechanical Code(IMC)
0 2009 International Fuel Gas Code(IFGC)
o 2009 International Energy Conservation Code(IECC)
Discussion:
• To answer Hugh Mackay, Mike Gebo stated the changes to the codes are at the attorneys' offices
and are not accessible to the public until they are approved.
o Hugh stated it was unclear to him how the board can make a recommendation on changes
they cannot read.
o Mike assured the board that professionals have been reviewing and making these changes
for the last year.
o Mike stated he is not asking the AQAB to review his code change package,but,based on
Mike's explanation tonight,to weigh in if it sounds doable or not.
• To answer John Schroeer,Mike Gebo stated the City of Fort Collins' Building Department has a
good Insurance Service Office(ISO)rating. However, the loss of personnel due to budget cuts
may impact the City's rating. Approving these codes may help counteract the loss of personnel.
• Rich Fisher asked if the code changes address low VOC paints. Mike stated that was not
addressed but the AQAB could recommend it.
• Dave Dietrich asked if formaldehyde had been addressed. Mike stated nothing in the standards
addressed that.
• Eric Levine asked if air quality degradation from treated lumber was addressed. Mike stated the
only issue about treated lumber was the type of attachments required.
• Dennis Georg asked if bad wall board was addressed. Mike Gebo stated there is nothing in the
codes to require higher quality wall board,only the size how to use them.
• Mike Gebo pointed out the codes are the minimum standards required for building—not above
and beyond. What the AQAB is asking could be addressed in the Green Building Code.
• Dave Dietrich asked how the building codes interact with the Green Building Code.
o Mike Gebo stated, once we adopt the 09 IECC, the building codes will be above the base
level of the Green Building Code under the energy section. Felix Lee at Utilities and his
committee are reviewing the commercial and residential aspects of green building in
order to develop a Green Building Code.
o Eric stated Boulder has a point system for green building and wondered how it compares
to Fort Collins' Green Building Code. Mike did not know but will ask Felix to look into
it.
• Nancy York asked if the AQAB asks the codes to address formaldehyde would Mike present it to
the committee. Mike stated if Council says to do more research,he would have to weigh the
pros and cons of additional costs from this item. He would have to draft it as a code and
2
consider if it is doable, feasible or cost effective. At that point Council would decide whether or
not to pursue the issue.
• Rich Fisher stated if these are minimum standards,would green codes be optional. Mike was not
sure. Green could be a minimum code. It has not been decided. Rich asked if there could be a
"recommended"level of codes above the minimum that a homeowner:or commercial developer
can use.
o Mike stated that happens all the time because there isn't a commercial building that meets
just the minimum standards. It is market driven and people do not want sick buildings so
they do more. Mike pointed out the current Fort Collins building codes do address radon
standards that are above the minimum.
• Eric Levine asked if the City Building Department is looking at health and safety requirements.
He suggested also measuring VOC and radon exposure from the health and safety standpoint and
say how much health and safety it buys per dollar.
o Mike stated he has data on radon but not on VOCs.
e Dennis pointed out protecting safety and health is also protecting the value of the property but
that value is hard to quantify. We should start building a case for building standards that produce
higher indoor air quality. -
o Mike stated the national standard as written is taking steps towards indoor air quality with
standards on duct tightening,weather and mold protection. They could do better.
• Dave suggested perhaps the AQAB could recommend something like..."that for the next three
year cycle we suggest that you look more closely at the following things....."
o Mike stated he is committed to have latest national standard on board as soon as possible.
That type of recommendation gives him time to consider the issues and how best to put
them together. To incorporate the AQAB's recommendations at this late date might not
allow enough time to do them properly
Dennis pointed out there is currently a lot of information from manufacturers at the hardware
stores about VOC paint and other environmentally-friendly building products. The products are
out there. Why can't the building code address them now.
o Rich suggested the City should compile a list of these green building items to be
considered as a precursor to the 2012 code revisions.
o If these suggestions were given to Council now to incorporate into the Building Code,
Mike anticipates Council would ask questions that he could not currently answer because
he has not researched green building products.
o Lucinda suggested the board could be proactive and weigh in now on the Green Building
code that is going to Council this year.
o Mike does not know much about the Green Building Code being. He suggested the
group contact Felix Lee and Utilities.
• Rich Fisher asked if Mike Gebo's code review committee had set any dollar limits on new codes
that would increase the cost of building new homes.
o Mike stated they only looked at national standards and local amendments;not costs.
o Rich suggested it would be useful to look at risks to health and safety against each code.
o Mike stated that type of outside the box thinking would have to be in the local
amendments. However, it is too late to do that in this code review.
• Eric pointed out that 40%of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) come from buildings.
• Eric asked how much has building decreased. Mike reported there were approximately 800
building permits last year, and only about 200 this year. The main issue is the inability to get
construction loans. Also,because of reduced building many of the sub-trades and manufacturers
have left the area. He anticipates it will take 10— 15 years for the building industry to fully
rebound.
3
• Lucinda asked if the new code would prepare for smart grids or micro wind turbines. Mike
stated the building code does not address them,however,photovoltaic is in the electric code.
• Rich asked where the Building Codes and Green Building Codes merge.
o Mike Gebo stated there are some conflicts because the 2009 building code has higher
energy conservation standards than the Green Building Code base line.
• Nancy York would like to have indoor air quality be addressed in the 2009 building code since it
is a health and safety issue now.
In closing,Mike Gebo reminded the board that the five International codes under consideration are for
minimum standards only;not desirable standards. He is taking the proposed I-codes to Council in mid-
July and would like to have the AQAB's input to add to his Council packet. He suggested the board
contact Felix Lee to weigh in on the Green Building Code with the innovative ideas they brought
forward tonight.
• Dennis Georg, with input from the group, suggested the Air Quality Advisory Board make the
following recommendations:
o That Council adopt the 2009 International Codes as presented with plans to add
standards as local amendments,to address indoor air quality,low VOC paints,
carpeting,building materials and best practices from the Green Building Code.
o That there be a process in the next review cycle(Green.Building Code and basic
code),to ask for Boards' and Commissions' input early enough in the process to
support changes.
o Potential building code amendments should be made based on cost and risk.
o Based on City commitments to adopted policies including the Climate Action Plan,
building codes should consider the risk to health and safety of citizens and reduce
ambient emissions.
• Lucinda will compile the suggestions made at this meeting and email the group for their input
and edits. The AQAB will vote on a final recommendation at the June meeting.
NOTE: At the June 21 AQAB meeting, Dennis Georg moved and Nancy York seconded a motion to
support the I-Codes adoption and to adopt the exact language they had discussed at their last meeting:
o That Council adopt the 2009 International Codes as presented with plans to add
standards as local amendments, to address indoor air quality, low YOCpaints,
carpeting, building materials and bestpractices from the Green Building Code.
o That there be a process in the next review cycle (Green Building Code and basic code),
to ask for Boards'and Commissions'input early enough in the process to support
changes.
o Potential building code amendments should be made based on cost and risk.
o Based on City commitments to adopted policies including the Climate Action Plan,
building codes should consider the risk to health and safety of citizens and reduce
ambient emissions.
The motion passed unanimously.
eview Air Quality Monitoring Network
Lucin a mi s resenting this it in response to
the current monitoring strategy a o consider whether any monitoring changes are
needed.
• Lu ' out that air quality monitoring in Fort Collins is mostly o
4
Natural Resources
Ci.y 8 ®f 215 Mason
9•� PO Boo x 580
F6rt
Colli Fort Collins,CO 80521
970.221-6600
om -fax
fcgov.
(cgov.com
MEMORANDUM
FROM THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY BAORD
Date: June 28,2010
To: Mayor and Council Members
From: Liz Pruessner on behalf of the Natural Resources Advisory Board
Subject: 2009 I—Codes with Local Amendments
The Natural Resources Advisory Board chose not to weigh in on the entire scope of the 2009.
International Building Codes. The Board considered the 2009 1-codes at our regular meeting on May 19,
with Mike Gebo giving a presentation. The local amendments were not complete at the time of our May
meeting,so the Board opted to wait until we could review them. The local amendments were sent to the
Board just before our June meeting. Following a lengthy discussion at our June meeting,the majority of
the Board felt that it was outside our expertise to vote on the entire set of code changes. Many members
had serious reservations about the section mandating installation of residential sprinkler systems for fire
suppression and the associated costs for homeowners. Ultimately the Board decided to only address the
energy conservation code sections,as this falls clearly within our purview.
NRAB voted 5-1 in favor of supporting the energy conservation elements contained in the 2009
International Building Codes(commercial and residential).
The dissenting vote was cast by a Board member who felt very strongly that the Board should have voted
on the entire package.
Please feel free to contact me regarding the NRAB's recommendation on this issue.
Respectfully Submitted,
Liz Pruessner,Chair
Natural Resources Advisory Board
970-484-4371
cc: Darin Atteberry,City Manager
John Stokes,Director,Natural Resources Dept.
Susie Gordon,Staff Liaison
Excerpt to the Natural Resources Advisory Board 6/16/10 meeting minutes
International Building Code
• The NRAB had some confusion regarding the Green Building Code and how it
related the IBC and sent some questions to Mike Gebo for clarification.
• In the last several days,the board received the local amendments for the International
Building Code(IBC)for their review and consideration in order to make final
recommendation to Mike Gebo.
o Liz pointed out the board could also discuss this at their July 7 meeting.
o Liz talked to the chair of the AQAB who said that board was generally
supportive of the IBC revisions, but would like to see more air quality
issues addressed in the IBC.
• Steve Ambrose was not sure he could make comments on the revisions as they were
very technical.
• Ethan Billingsly also said he felt the codes are outside the NRAB's purview.
• Harry Edwards did not think the NRAB had the expertise to make a recommendation.
• Clint suggested the NRAB focus on codes that address energy because the rest of
them are really outside the NRAB's purview.
• Clint stated he would not support mandated fire suppression systems because.cost is
substantial.
o Glen stated implementation of fire suppression was pushed to 2013 so the
building department can do more research on it.
• Glen felt the NRAB should give a recommendation on the entire codes,not just the
energy segments.
• Ethan was concerned watering down a memo with information that is not directly
relevant to the NRAB
• Glen felt the IBC codes was a good document with a lot of good elements and should
be approved. ,
• Liz pointed out the NRAB had made recommendations to Council on building codes
in the past.
Glen Colton moved that the Natural Resources Advisory Board recommend that Council adopt
the 2009 International Building codes with local amendments. However,the NRAB is split on
support of the mandatory fire suppression systems for new building and renovations because
the cost factor is substantial.
Joe Piesman made a friendly amendment to also say the NRAB supports the energy
conservation elements contained with the IBC.
Without a second,motion died.
Joe Piesman moved that the Natural Resources Advisory Board express its support for the
energy conservation elements contained in the International Building Codes. Liz Pruessner
seconded.
Motion Passed 5-1
All in favor,Joe Piesman,Liz Pruessner,Ethan Billingsly,Clint Skutchan,Harry Edwards
Opposed—Glen Colton because he felt the recommendation should be about the entire codes,
not just the codes addressing energy.
• Liz Pruessner will write a memo to the Council and send a copy to Mike Gebo to
include in his packet for Council's work session. She will add a cover letter also
expressing gratitude to Mike Gebo for his presentation.
Building Review Board BRB May 27,2o10 Pg.2
May 27, 2010
minutestes lower quality service that is now occurring
i
&Neighborhood Services.
Q--- w4aw.Lchneider made a motion to approve the minutes from April 29,2010., B
Member Miller pro second.
Vote:
Yeas: Dunlap,Miller
Abstain: S
ram, Schneider
_.
2. 2009 I-CODE PRESENTATION
Introduction and Code History
Gebo reviewed the information to be presented to City Councif later this"summer and suggested
that board members ask questions as the information was being presented. °HOadded that he
would be asking board members for their comments,;concerns and a recommendation that he
could take to City Council.
Gebo explained that building codes have been around fora long time, with the City of Fort
Collins passing the first local building codes in 1924, followed by adoption of the first Uniform
Building Code in 1927. He added that there':were four separate code writing bodies across the
nation in the 1990's which made it difficult For one builder"to move across the country and know
which codes to use. In the late 1990's, the four bodies formed the International Code Council
and work began to produce one code. Gebo noted th f the Jntgrnational Codes were first
implemented in 2000.
According to Gebo,the.International Code CounGil-,,(ICC)meets periodically to review submitted
code changes from member jurisdictions. The code cl�aKnges are discussed,voted upon and then
new codes published every tlree.:years.
Gebo stated`that Forf-follins convened a committee in July of 2009,which consisted of
developers,builders, contractors, the fire.department, and building officials from local
neighs oririg jurisdictions.144resentativ&s from the Building Review Board and Home Builders
Association were also part oftfie committee. He noted that the committee reviewed the
significant changes to the codes; and on April 22 of 2010, voted unanimously to move the codes
forward.
Gebo mentioned that thefive specific codes that will be adopted are the 2009 International
Building Code(IBC),., 2009 International Residential Code(IRC), the 2009 International
Mechanical Code(IMC), the 2009 International Fuel Gas Code(IFGC), and the 2009
International Energy Conservation Code(IECC). He added that these will replace the 2006
International Building Code and 2006 International Energy Conservation Code adopted in July
of 2008 and the 2003 International Residential Code,the 2003 International Mechanical Code,
and the 2003 International Fuel Gas Code adopted in January of 2005.
Geho explained that the purpose of the code updates is to set minimum construction standards
that affect the life,health, and safety of the public. The purpose is also to incorporate the latest
advances in construction materials and techniques. Gebo noted that some of the items in the
BRB May 27,2010 Pg.3
2009 Commercial Code are related to September 11; i.e., illuminated stripping on tower
stairways and tower handrails so a person can see in pitch black. He stated that this will be the
first time that Fort Collins has adopted the five core building codes under one addition year. He
added that this is important because the codes integrate with one another.
2009 IBC
Gebo explained that the 2009 IBC sets minimum standards regulating all commercial and multi-
family construction projects. He added that there are numerous changes addressing high-rise
construction and first-responder safety. According to Gebo, the new codes will require
commercial buildings to have an antenna system for emergency responder radios. Gebo noted
that the definitions of occupancies and accessibility requirements have been improved, as well as
code standards added for new projects.
Gebo stated that local amendments to the I-Codes have been reduced from 80 to 54. The
' amendments reference the Fort Collins City Code and Land.Use Code and include items related
to fees,permits, appeal processes, violations/fines, and_definitions. He noted.that each of the
codes has a similar type of local amendment so instead of having half a dozen amendments to the
mechanical code,there is one that references all of#hose sections,that have been modified in the
building code. 'ram
Gebo mentioned that fire containment has been retained, carbon.,monoxide and smoke alarms
have been incorporated for remodel work;'and_requirements related.to accessible dwelling unit
features and ratio to non-accessible units remain.. Gebo added that=siaterlaws are referenced in
the local amendments,that radon resistance construction in multi-fairily units was retained,that
wind and snow loads specific to Fort Collins are identified,:that roof flashing requirements were
improved, and that touch free_restroom requirements in food establishments were maintained.
2009 IRC _--=-
Gebo stated the IRC sets nimum-standards regulating single-family, duplex, and town home
construction.projects. He added that the local amendments were reduced from 135 to 90, that the
code includes various standards-for new products,and that some improvements have been added
related to.construction details aiidT,, ant safety. Gebo noted that a single family builder
should only need this one code. He'�also:noted that the IRC,under Chapter 11 (Energy)is the
same:as the 2009 IECC which is the stand alone energy code that is used for commercial
S
construction..:.'.
Gebo explained that under the 2009 IRC, fire sprinklers will be required in all new single family
home,duplex, and town home projects. He added that the original effective date for that change
was January 2011;however, there has been a lot of discussion state-wide about the January 2011
effective date because the Division of Fire Safety requires that contractors installing sprinkler
systems be licensed and certified through the Division. According to Gebo,this code introduces
a combination residential potable water sprinkler system under one combination system and that
currently only licensed plumbers are authorized to install potable water systems. He stated that
this has resulted in a disconnect as to who can install these types of systems for single family and
duplex homes and is part of the reason Fort Collins will be suggested a delayed implementation
of this requirement.
Gebo stated that an ad hoc committee was formed that included many jurisdictions across the
State of Colorado, together with fire marshals and individuals involved in sprinkler installation.
BRB May 27,2010 Pg.4
The ad hoc committee recommended the adoption of the 2009 IRC,but recommended a move of
the effective date for installing fire sprinklers to 2013. Thus, the Fort Collins' Committee is
recommending to City Council that the City of Fort Collins adopt this same delay to 2013.
Geho explained that because the IRC now includes fire sprinklers in one- and two- family
dwellings and town homes,they've lessened the fire ratings between dwellings. He added that
for existing buildings that are not sprinkled, a two hour rating wall will continue to be required
between the two units. For buildings that contain a fire suppression system, a one hour rating
wall will be required.
Gebo next discussed the Insurance Service Office(ISO). He stated that the ISO is a private
entity that grades local jurisdictions based on numerous elements;.i;e:;the number of inspectors
employed by a jurisdiction, the number of inspections being done,etc.. He noted that Fort
Collins has a grade of two out of ten(one being the best)and added that it is.almost impossible
to earn a one in this rating system. Gebo stated that the ISO is anticipating that local premiums,
once fire sprinkler systems are required, could be reduced'15 tween 8% and 15%of current
premiums.
Board Member Schneider shared his concerns about ttus-statisticrashe has talked to individuals
who feel that this requirement will increase homeowner insurance rates. He asked Gebo to
provide additional documentation to the-board related to thisa'Gebo confirmed that he would do
SO.
There was additional discussion on the likelihood of insurance rates decreasing due to the water
damage that would occur if the sprinklers were to run:'Gebo teporTed statistics from PFA which
show that a residential sprinklermay put 150 gallons of water on a fire where a fire hose will put
out 1,500 gallons. So,Gebo stafed;that this should not negatively impact insurance rates since
the water damage would'_be higher�zf the fire department responds.
Board Member Schneider stated_that_gnq committee meeting was devoted to this topic,but a
follow up meeting intended to review additional information from both sides of the argument
was not held. There was some feeling that the pros and cons of this topic had not been
thoroughly reviewed and discussed.Gebg=responded that the rationale was that the ad hoc
committee:of fire marshals and jurisdictions accomplished this and their recommendation was
being supported. —
A board member asked Gebo how he will respond to City Council if they ask what jurisdictions
in the State of Colorado have already adopted this without delaying the implementation date.
Gebo responded that he plans to provide supporting documentation to City Council,and one of
those documents will address the other jurisdictions and the codes they have adopted. He added
that Greeley is the only jurisdiction he knows of that has adopted the code using the original
date. Gebo explained that he will also be promoting the combination system over the stand alone
system and that this will require additional time for training and licensing. Gebo plans to explain
to City Council that the delay is effective and beneficial to the final end product.
A board member requested that the fire suppression issue be placed on the board's agenda for
review in January 2012. Gebo confirmed that this would be done.
BRB May 27,2010 Pg.5
Gebo stated that carbon monoxide and smoke detectors will be required for remodel work under
the IRC. A board member questioned Section 9.07.9 which states that"For each new
construction approved, a carbon monoxide alarm shall be installed outside each separate sleeping
area in the immediate vicinity." The board member asked if that section should coincide with
the state statute? Gebo stated that he believed the state says 15 feet from a sleeping area. He
provided an example of a house with a sleeping area in the basement and one on the second
floor. According to Gebo,that layout would require two monoxide detectors because it is
impossible to provide one detector within 15 feet of all sleeping areas. It was suggested that
further work was needed on this section to ensure clarity. Gebo stated he would review that
section and improve the wording as needed.
Gebo stated that other local amendments to the IRC include wall construction details to 3 feet
from the property tine, alignment of mechanical and fuel gas sectons" ith proposed 2009 il,/LC
and IFGC, ventilation improvements for exhaust,moisture control aridduct conditions, the
requirement for radon-resistance construction in new homes,ani improved_r_oof flashing
requirements. =
2009 IMC
Gebo reported the 2009 IMC deals with minimum standards regulating commerci Heating,
venting, and air conditioning. He noted that there are 20 IMC local amendments. .Gebo
explained that there is a new section that;regulates temporaryk at in large construction
buildings, as well as regulations relating`fo1_the safety of equipment.for a construction site,i.e., an
access hatch will have to be large enough tq ull_an entire piece of-equipment out,not pieces of
Gebo stated there is also a new method for calculating the amount of fresh air in a commercial
building. The new calculation is.called breathable air, whiclfis 3 feet off the floor and 6 feet
high. That volume is:used to calculate the amourit'of fresh air that is needed for the room. He
clarified that this requirement will result in an energy-savings and still provide sufficient air.
Gebo stated tha1-7dfi_code allows for new common dryer venting for high rise buildings where it
is oftentimes difficult to-get the dryer vent out. He explained that the vents can now join into a
common-dryer venting system similar to.the chimney effect that was previously used for
bathroomTexhaust fans. 11 e=1'ength has'been increased from 25 to 35 feet.
He stated the&-a', requirement§that ductwork must be protected from dirt and debris during
construction and I,hat a filter is'now required on the return air duct.
Gebo added there are'also� eferences in the IMC to the proposed IECC for system sizing, duct
installation,system commissioning and testing.He noted that there were also some clarifications
for equipment access size, dryer vents, and installation of gas lines under buildings.
2009 IFGC
Gebo stated the 2009 IFGC sets the minimum standards regulating all commercial appliances
fueled by natural gas or propane. He noted that there are approximately 30 local amendments.
Gebo explained that there were changes to equipment access size,dryer vent length increased
from 25 to 35 feet, installation of gas lines under buildings is clarified, and there is inclusion of
various standards for new products and construction details. Gebo stated that the buried gas line
depth is established at 18 inches and all references to ventless appliances have been deleted. He
BRB May 27,2010 Pg.6
added that they are proposing to adopt the requirement for exhaust ventilation in kitchens with
gas cooking ovens from the 2009 IECC.
2009 IECC
Gebo stated that the IECC covers minimum standards regulating energy conservation in all
buildings, commercial and residential. He noted that there are approximately 10 local
amendments. Gebo explained that the ICC is estimating that moving to the 2009 IECC versus
the 2006 IECC will produce an energy efficiency 12%greater over the 2006 IECC. He stated,
however,that efficiency will be at a cost. Insulation values in the exterior walls jump from RI
to R20. The bedroom floor above a garage moved from R19 to R30. Gebo estimated that the
insulation costs for a new baseline single family home will increase by$2,000 based on this new
code.
Gebo reported that the Affordable Housing Committee expressed concerns about the increased
cost to a baseline home under the proposed code. He addedthat although the increased cost is
about$2,000, there is a 4 to 7% energy savings. Each$1. 00Tof incremental increase in
mortgage cost equals about$5.50 per month, so the...$2000 adjustment would increase the
mortgage payment about$11.00 per month. He uotedthat this Bost would be offset by a 7%
energy efficiency savings. _
Gebo stated that programmable thermostats will be required;that 50%of fixed lighting will be
required to be high efficacy lighting, and'that air ducts will need to.be tested for tightness. He
mentioned that there previously was a local amendment that allowed fbtless insulation for
affordable housing units bufthat this amendment was deleted since--this defeats the ability to
decrease ongoing monthly energy costs by increasing-energy.effieiency. Gebo added that there
are minimal local amendments`to,establish local design parameters from CSU.
Residential Cost Estimates
Gebo noted that the fire spnnkler systems will add approximately$4,000 to the base cost of a
home and that the new energy Code requirements are anticipated to add approximately$2,000,
for a total added cost of$6,000 $2,000 of this would go into effect immediately once the codes
are adopted due to the increased energy code requirements. The remaining$4,000 would not go
into effect until 2013, when,the fire sprinkler requirement is proposed to be implemented.
Next Steps .:. .
Gebo stated that he will continue to do presentations to various boards and commissions through
early June. He noted that he had already met with the Affordable Housing Board and they were
moving towards supporting_ the 2009 I-Code approval,but did not like the fact that there is an
immediate$2,000 increase in construction cost and a possible future$4,000 increased cost. The
Commission on Disabilities supported the 2009 I-Codes. Gebo stated he has also met with the
Natural Resources Commission and the Air Quality Advisory Board. The Air Quality Advisory
Board wants the Code to do more. Gebo added that it is possible the Green Building Code may
address some of the items they are interested in.
Gebo stated he will go to the City Council work session on July 27a'and present this agenda
item. If that goes well, the First Reading will be on September 7, and the Second Reading will
be on September 21$with an adoption date around October I"
BRB May 27,2010 Pg.7
A board member asked if staff had statistics on the percentage of home fires in low income
versus medium or high income homes. His thought was if home fires occur more often in low
income homes,there would be health and safety benefits for the$4,000 increased cost. Gebo
responded that he would visit with the Fire Marshal regarding the issue. In aprevious discussion
Gebo had with the Fire Marshall, they had documented four structure fires that had residential
sprinkler systems. The sprinkler system extinguished two of the fires immediately before they
spread. A homeowner was able to extinguish one fire before the sprinkler system was activated,
and the fourth fire started outside the building so the building was destroyed before the sprinkler
system could activate.
It was noted that Northern Colorado Home Builders Association will hold their Board of
Directors meeting on June 8a'. Gebo was invited to do a five minute presentation to the Board-if
he desired.
A board member commented that a more stringent energy,code might impede the movement of
the Green Building Code because the two will closely coincfde. If the energy code is too
restrictive,it could jeopardize the Green Building Code because they have to mesh. Gebo said
there is a 12% energy efficiency improvement according to theICC moving from the to the
2009 energy code. He noted that the baseline bronze or h;EED requirement says you must be 6%
better than the 2006 energy code that we're under. OnceAe_. 9 code is adopted, Gebo
explained that since we will already be at a 12%improvementover the 2006 code,he thought the
base level would automatically be silver instead of bronze. It wasnoted that this could be a
factor because it is anticipated that the 2009 IBCC_will be adopted before the City comes forward
with the Green Building Code and if it is too:restrictive.or there arc;tdb many amendments,it has
a real potential to impact Green Building Code efforts. Gebo stated he agreed with that comment
and that was one reason why no.amendments were made to this energy code.
A board member complimented the committee for reducing the number of amendments because
it will make it easier fortleGontraetors and there will be more consistency by using the national
standards.
A board member commented that Fort Collins staff should be encouraged to become involved
with stafe_and national code development 'Gebo thanked the board members for their comments.
He aske t for a vote on the I Codes
Member.Schneider moved thatthe Building Review Board recommend to City Council that they
adopt the 2009 I=Code Family: Member Miller seconded the motion.
Vote: -=
Yeas: Smith, Cram, .SAineider,Dunlap,Miller
Nays: None.
FOLLOW-UP REPORTS:
Heating&Air Conditioning
Gebo reviewed the circumstanc the previous Swan Heating&Air Conditioning
discussion. There w permits that Swan d failed to bring into compliance.
Gebo stat ontacted Tim Swan and that Mr. Swan came 'th him. Swan
1N, FCBR
FORT COLLINS BOARD OF REALTORS"
110 W. Harvard
Fort Collins, CO 80525
p. (970)223-2900
www.f0r.ong
June 22, 2010
FCBR supports the city's update of the 2009 International Residential Code, excepting
the inclusion of Fire Suppression Systems for all new 1 & 2 family homes. Reasons for this
position.are:
• FCBR believes save horsing for owners and tenants is a priority, but recognize many
families must consider housing costs and affordability;
• Housing affordability has not been a consideration of this city council, or previous
councils, as many policies have been adopted which have increased the cost of all
homes;
• FCBR believes a diverse housing stock is a benefit to the community;
• Little or no evidence fire suppression systems will prevent fires, but strong evidence
shows only a small return on the investment of these systems,water damage from
malfunctioning systems can be more costly than fire damage;
• Current building codes and construction practices produce much safer homes; smoke
alarms and detectors are already mandated for I &2 family homes; improved heating
and electrical design results in less use of extension cords and space heaters, and
wiring systems not prone to fires
• Fire suppression systems aren't designed to put fires out, only to slow them.
• PFA has the quickest response time on the Front Range at 4:11, including Littleton who
recently chose not to include the fire suppression requirement.
• Fire deaths and injuries in Fort Collins are for below the national average.
• Other building code changes and warning system requirements have decreased fire
casualties across the country so greatly that no significant decrease can be
demonstrated by this additional requirement.
• In a cold weather climate how often are these systems going to malfunction and
cause more damage than they prevent during a fire.
The suppression system would not be required in the garage and therefore would not prevent
harm from such fires.
Excerpt from Unapproved Electric Board June 2,2010, Minutes
Robin Pierce,Executive Administrative Assistant
Adoption of the 2009 International Code Changes with Local Amendments
(Presentation available upon request)
Mike Gebo, chief building official with the City of Fort Collins,presented information to
the Board on the 2009 International Building Codes (I-Codes). He is seeking a
recommendation to City Council to adopt the latest national building codes before the
item goes to Council work session on July 27...later rescheduled to July 13 (first reading
September 7; second reading September 21 with anticipated adoption on October 1,
2010). An open house for the public is scheduled for June 17.
The International Code Council(ICC)represents one national body of code professionals
with oversight over the national I-Codes, which were first published in 2000. Further,
Fort Collins convened a 2009 International Code Review Committee in July 2009
comprised of developers, architects, builders,building and fire officials, and trades
people. The goal of the Code Review Committee was to review the current Fort Collins
amendments and significant changes,in the 2009 I-Codes and to promote consistency by
limiting the number of local amendments to the National Standard.
Building codes are integrated with and cross reference each other, which is an important
reason to synchronize and use the same code editions. The five proposed I-Codes
include:
2009 International Building Code(IBC)
2009 International Residential Code(IRC)
2009 International Mechanical Code(IMC)
2009 International Fuel Gas Code(IFGC)
2009 International Energy Conservation Code(IECC)
The current effort from both the ICC and a locally convened Code Review Committee
seeks to limit local amendments in order to promote consistency to the National Standard.
The Building Review Board who hears violations to building code is very supportive of
reducing the number of local amendments, as are local contractors. This will be the first
time the City adopts all core I-Codes in the same version. This I-Code revision
incorporates the latest advances in construction as a result of current events,e.g. the
September 11 terrorist attack event led to recommendations for certain types of stairway
marking.
The minimum standards regulate all commercial and multi-family projects.
Board discussion:
Is there data to support the residential sprinkler system requirement in the IRC?
Records indicate 300,000 residential.fires across the nation according to the National Fire
Protection Administration(NFPA)with 3,000 lives lost. A residential sprinkler system is
shown to reduce deaths by 75 percent and damage to the building by 80 percent, and is
designed to give occupants time to vacate the structure.
Unapproved Electric Board Minutes 1
June 2,2010
How will confusion be avoided with the Green Building codes which also go to Council
in the same time frame? The I-Codes are basic core construction codes which, once
adopted, are required, and this is a standard time to update these five codes. The first
conflict between the I-Codes and the Green Building codes may come with the
International Energy Conservation Code(IECC). The Green Building codes may
automatically be at the baseline due to the adoption of the IECC code before them.
Customer and Employee Relations Manager Patty Bigner suggests coordinating the
messages between the two groups for the benefit of Council.
Energy Services Manager John Phelan noted the Green Building codes are the first
generation version for both residential and commercial and are a scoring tool. The Green
Building team has made the most progress with site and lot issues,but is just in the
process of mapping out what is already covered by other codes, e.g. Land Use Code.
Both the I-Codes and Green Building codes would be administered through the City's
Community Development and Neighborhood Services department.
Are there any examples of other code changes that didn't go well and required
amendment later? The concept of hands-free restrooms for all remodels met with issues
and did not meet the proposed intent. The residential energy code local amendment
always created confusion about which code to use to comply with Fort Collins. The best
way to address issues is to standardize with the I-Codes with as few local amendments as
possible.
Is there something that could be done to make it easier for potential home buyers to
research the code information about a property they are considering? It's not clear what
the home buyer might need. Insulation R-values are posted in the structure somewhere
near the electric panel. Engineering reports are also scanned in and available on-line to
the public.
Are there standards for fans being installed in radon systems? Since the system includes
piping plus electrical work required for the fan, contractors need clearer standards for
retrofit jobs related to length of the cord and fan rating. Retrofits are not regulated. A
full set of directions for what the installation should look like=a passive system only
applicable to new construction—is contained in a local amendment.
As a user of these codes, Board Member Wolley applauded the effort to gain consistency
by adopting all the 2009 I-Codes together.
Board Member Bihn supports City staff merging both parts of the code effort,unless
Council specifically asked for them to be separate. Mr. Gebo noted that Council is well
aware he is bringing the 20091-Codes and that the Green Building codes are also coming
online, which contain other components,not just codes. Through the recent Budget
Lead Team and other processes,he's heard no comments about bringing them together.
Unapproved Electric Board Minutes 2
June 2,2010
Motion: Board Member Wolley moved the Electric Board recommends that City
Council adopt the five 2009 ICC codes (IBC,IRC,IMC,IRGC and IECC)with
associated local amendments. Board Member Bihn seconded the motion.
Discussion on the motion:
Vice Chairperson Yurash would rather see the Board abstain from making a
recommendation on the Iocal amendment related to the fire sprinkler requirement. Mr.
Gebo has added a caveat to delay the requirement from January 2011 to January 2013 to
allow time to work on certifying and training contractors.
Vote on the motion:
Three four; one against(Vice Chairperson Yurash for the reason stated above).
Unapproved Electric Board Minutes 3
June 2,2010
Landmark Preservation Commission
June 9,2010
The following is the motion in which the LPC recommended adoption of the 2009
Building Codes:
"Mr. Ernest moved that the LPC recommend the adoption of the newly amended
2009 Building Codes. Mr. Albright seconded the motion. Motion passed: (5-0)."
A copy of the complete June 9a'minutes will be available later.
Excerpt from Unapproved Water Board June 17, 2010,Minutes
Robin Pierce,Executive Administrative Assistant,Utilities
Adoption of the 2009 International Code Changes with Local Amendments
(Presentation available upon request)
Mike Gebo,chief building official with the City of Fort Collins, presented information to
the Board on the 2009 International Building Codes (I-Codes). He is seeking a
recommendation to City Council to adopt the latest national building codes before the
item goes to Council work session on.July 13 (first reading September 7; second reading
September 21 with anticipated adoption on October 1,2010). An open house for the
public is scheduled for June 17.
The International Code Council(ICC)represents one national body of code professionals
with oversight over the national I-Codes,which were first published in 2000. Further,
Fort Collins convened a 2009 International Code Review Committee in July 2009
comprised of developers, architects,builders,building and fire officials, and trades
people. The goal of the Code Review Committee was to review the current Fort Collins
amendments and significant changes in the 2009 I-Codes and to promote consistency by
limiting the number of local amendments to the National Standard.
Building codes are integrated with and cross reference each other, which is an important
reason to synchronize and use the same code editions. The five proposed I-Codes
include:
2009 International Building Code (IBC)
2009 International Residential Code(IRC)
2009 International Mechanical Code(IMC)
2009 International Fuel Gas Code(IFGC) *
2009 International Energy Conservation Code(IECC)
*Note: There are no new significant changes in this code set which affect water use or
conservation.
The IRC is written as a stand-alone code for building single family,duplex and
townhome projects. Mr. Gebo highlighted an important change to this code with the
2009 edition. Fire suppression systems will be required in all new residential dwellings
effective January 2011. Combination potable water and fire suppression systems are an
option for these projects and are attractive due to their affordability. A decision must be
made about which type of professional can install such systems, e.g. a licensed plumber
or a certified fire sprinkler system installer. A State ad hoc committee suggests adoption
of the 2009 IRC with a caveat that the sprinkler system requirement be delayed until
January 2013 until all can see how the 2012 code edition speaks to this issue. The City of
Greeley has adopted the 2009 codes without the delayed date,and four or five other
Colorado jurisdictions have adopted them with the delayed date.
Board discussion:
Does this requirement apply to remodels? This requirement only applies to new
residential construction,not remodels or additions.
Water Board Unapproved Minutes 1
June 13, 2010
Did the ad hoc committee have affordable housing representation? The information has
been presented to the Affordable Housing Board, who expressed concern about the
additional cost. The expense to include a sprinkler system should equate to $2-2.25 per
square foot,and this estimate may be high compared to the cost to sprinkle commercial
buildings (about$1.25 per square foot).
Do these systems require an increased tap size? They do not unless it's going into a very
large home. The cost is involved for installation of the system.
Are there other permits where systems are being self-installed? The combination system
is new to this version of the IRC. About 300 homes in Fort Collins have stand-alone
systems,which relates to proximity of fire department services. The 2009 edition of the
I-Codes focus on putting the fire out before it grows,which is an evolution in the
thinking of the ICC whose focus used to be on fire containment.
Grey water systems would be regulated by the State. Chairperson Janett noted the Water
Board's Conservation and Public Education Committee interest in receiving updates on
grey water systems.
Customer and Employee Relations Patty Bigner added staff will have determine solutions
for scenarios where water may be turned off due to non-payment of a bilk and the
relationship to the existence of water in the residence's system for fire suppression.
Motion: Board Member Brown supports the staffs recommendation to delay the
fire suppression component of the International Residential Code(IRC) due to
impacts of water shut-offs to fire suppression scenarios until January 2013 and
looks forward to the staffs recommendation and presentation prior to
implementing the IRC code change. Board Member Gessler seconded the
motion.
Board Member Domfest offered a friendly amendment to place emphasis on the
importance of staff committing to return to the Board for further feedback before
implementation of the code. As a result, "at a later time"will be inserted into the motion.
Board Members Brown and Gessler agreed with the friendly amendment.
Amended Motion: Board Member Brown supports the staffs recommendation
to delay the fire suppression component of the International Residential Code
(IRC) due to impacts of water shut-offs to fire suppression scenarios until
January 2013 and looks forward to the staffs recommendation and presentation
at a later time prior to implementing the IRC code change. Board Member
Gessler seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: It passed unanimously.
Water Board Unapproved Minutes 2
June 13, 2010
Ms. Bigner introduced Utilities staff who are present to update the board on the Green
Building Program. When Mr. Gebo's presentation went before the Electric Board,
questions were raised about the relationship of the building codes to the emerging Green
.Building Program. As a result, Mr. Gebo's group and the Green Building Program staff
are working together. Doug Swartz, energy services engineer, and Felix Lee, green
building code project manager noted Council directed Utilities to lead the development of
the Green Building Program,which is a broad term that includes a number of elements,
including code and"above code"items,to support the program. Community
stakeholders serve in an advisory role on a Green Building Program Advisory Committee
(GBPAC) and technical advisory committees. The codes within the I-Codes and the
Green Building Program are in agreement with each other. The Green Building Program
will also conduct public open houses and visit boards to present information.
Water Board Unapproved Minutes 3
June 13, 2010
Open Public Meeting—June 17,2010
As a whole,the attendees supported the adoption of the 2009 International Codes. The'concerns
that did arise were related to the cost of residential sprinklers.
Acronym glossary Attachment 910
2009 I-Codes 2009 International Codes Proposed latest body of codes
ANSI American National Standards Institute General standards writing authority(accessibility)
ASHRAE American Society Heating, Refrigeration & A.0 Engineers Mechanical-related standards writing authority
ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Numbering system for energy standards Commercial energy standards
IBC International Building Code Commercial construction standards
ICC International Code Council Code-related writing authority
IECC International Energy Conservation Code Energy Standards
IFGC International Fuel Gas Code Gas Appliance Standards
IMC International Mechanical Code Mechanical Standards
IPC International Plumbing Code State adopted plumbing code
IRC International Residential Code Residential Standards
ISO Insurance Service Office Agency which grades jurisdictions for insurance rates
NEC National Electric Code State adopted electric code
NFPA National Fire Prevention Association Fire-related standards writing authority
NFPA 13D Numbering system for sprinkler systems Residential system, dwellings
NFPA 13R Numbering system for sprinkler systems Residential system, multi family
P2904 IRC Section number Combination sprinkler and potable water
PFA Poudre Fire Authority Local fire department
R-13,R-15,R-20 Numbering system for insulation resistance values The higher the number the better
RESNET Residential Energy Service Network ICC approved energy software provider
R-Value Resistance Value Insulation rating y
SIPS Structural Insulated Panel System Engineered construction panels w/built-in insulation y
SPA System Performance Approach Energy compliance program/software
n
UBC Uniform Building Code Past commercial code
C=f
z
y
0
ATTACHMENT
Fort Collins City Council
Work Session
July 13 , 2010
Introduction for Adoption of the
2009 International Codes
Steve Dush , Director
Michael Gebo , Chief Building Official
Community Development & Neighborhsee Services
ctY o
1
Subject for Discussion
Adoption of the 2009 International Codes
2009 International Building Code
20091nternational Residential Code
2009 International Mechanical Code
2009 International Fuel Gas Code
2009 International Energy Conservation Code
2
�tr�
Replacing Current Codes
20061nternational Building Code
20061nternational Energy Conservation
(July 2008 )
20031nternational Residential Code
20031nternational Mechanical Code
20031nternational Fuel Gas Code
(January 2005 )
C Yoe
3
�F�t
Executive Summary
2009 International Codes
Published by the International Code Council ( ICC )
• Establish minimum construction standards to
safeguard the public health , safety and welfare .
• Regulating :
. structural strength and stability ,
. sanitation , light and ventilation ,
. energy conservation , and property protection .
4
try
Executive Summary
2009 International Codes
• Most current edition of nationally recognized
construction standards .
• Fully integrated "core" building codes .
• Includes standards for newly approved
construction systems , materials and products .
• Includes safeguards resulting from current
events .
ctY or
F�t��`
5 :a
General Direction Sought
Does Council have any concerns with the proposed
2009 I - Codes or amendments , such as the
effective date of the residential sprinkler
requirement?
Does Council concur with staff presenting the
adopting ordinances for Council ' s consideration
on First and Second Readings ( September 7 ,
2010 and September 21 , 2010 , respectively ) with
an effective date of October 1 , 2010 ?
6
�trh
Background
Code adoption process
• Periodic adoption of up-to-date construction
standards ongoing process since 1924 .
• 2009 I -Codes reviewed locally by committee of
industry professionals ,
— Evaluated all significant changes in I -Codes ,
— Reviewed all local amendments and propose
only necessary local amendments ,
— Voted to unanimously support adoption .
C Yoe
7
�Ltf�
■
2009 International Building Code
Overview
Commercial and multi -family projects
• Numerous changes addressing first-responder
safety .
• Accessibility Improvements to new courtrooms .
• New safeguards for exit control of elderly .
• General administrative improvements .
No significant or controversial changes identified.
s
�trh
2009 International Residential Code
Overview
Single-family , duplex and townhome projects
• Fire-sprinklers required in new dwellings as of
January 2011 .
Continued evolution of ICUs philosophy promoting
fire extinguishing over fire containment and
represents the most significant change in the
2009 I- Codes package .
9
2009 International Residential Code
Overview
Residential fire-suppression systems
• Fire-suppression systems required in townhomes
upon adoption of the 2009 IRC .
• Propose delaying fire sprinklers in single-family
and duplex homes until January 2013 .
— Consistent with Colorado jurisdictions and
Colorado Fire- Marshals .
— Time for State to develop regulations and
training of installers .
10
tr y in
2009 Internatio nical Code
O
Commercial and multi -family heating , venting and
air conditioning systems
• Improves energy efficiency by :
. Reducing outside air requirements ,
. New insulation requirements for floor heating .
• Requires combustion air to wood burning
appliances .
No significant or controversial changes identified
•Collin
2009 Internatio e
Ove
Commercial and multi -family appliances fueled
by natural gas or propane
• Improves working access to appliances .
• Clarifies installation of gas lines under buildings .
• Recognizes special gas line systems .
No significant or controversial changes identified
12
try-
2009 International Energy Conservation
Code Overview
Requirements for commercial structures
• Increases insulation values in steel stud framing .
• New requirements for construction of air- handling
ducts and testing .
No significant or controversial changes identified
f
O"PF� �
13
2009 International Energy Conservati
Code Overview
Requirements for residential structures
• Improves efficiency by 12%- 18% over current 2006 IECC .
• Increases wall insulation R-Values .
• Requires programmable thermostats .
• 50% of fixed lighting to be high efficacy.
Represents a significant change to
residential construction
14
rtfl
Implementation Cost Estimates :
Residential Fire -Suppression Systems
• Multi -family or townhomes : ( 13R or 13D system )
$ 1 . 50-$ 3 . 50 per square foot of floor area
Effective the date of adoption of the IRC.
• Single-family : ( 13D or Combination system )
$ 1 . 50-$2 . 20 per square foot of floor area
Proposing effective date of January 1 , 2013.
Fo�Y� �tf`s
15
Cost Examination :
Current Residential 2006 Energy Code
• 2A Framing : $ 11500 . 00
• Insulation (frame walls) : $2 , 300 . 00
• Insulation (basement walls) : Not Required
• Energy rating program : Not Required
• High Efficacy lighting : Not Required
Total : $3 , 800 . 00
• Monthly energy cost : $ 131 . 58
• Monthly mortgage ($ 150 , 000 ) $805 . 00
Total monthly mortgage & energy $ 936 . 58
cit
16
try
Cost Examination :
Proposed Residential 2009 Energy Code
• 2x4 Framing : $ 13500 . 00
• Insulation (frame walls) : $33000 . 00
• Insulation (basement walls) : $ 15046 . 00
• Energy rating program : $ 525 . 00
• High Efficacy lighting : $ 100 . 00
Total : $6 , 171 . 00
• Monthly energy cost : $ 123 . 08
• Monthly mortgage ($ 152 , 371 ) $817 . 96
Total monthly mortgage & energy $941 . 04
CRy of
FOf� I5 '
17
Benefits of 2009 I -Codes
• National and Front Range support for residential
fire-suppression systems .
• Improved energy efficiency in all construction .
• Fort Collins as a Northern Colorado leader in
code adoptions .
• Fort Collins has an outstanding insurance rating .
• Aligns "core" codes under single edition year.
• Up-to-date standards as a base for future Green
Building Program .
Olt
18
try
Public Outre
• Affordable Housing Board May 6
• Commission on Disability May 13
• Air Quality Advisory Board May 17
• Natural Resource Advisory May 19
• Building Review Board May 27
• Board of Realtors June 1
• Electric Board June 2
• Landmark Preservation June 9
• Water Board June 17
• Open Public Meeting June 17
Foc '19
tfl-
Public Comments
General support for the adoption of the proposed
2009 International Codes including the increased
cost of the energy codes .
General concern over the increased cost verses the
benefit of fire-suppression systems required in new
single family homes .
20
tr y in
1
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends adoption of the proposed 2009
International Codes as presented and amended .
Effective date of October 1 , 2010
otY or
ollins
General Direction Sought
Does Council have any concerns with the proposed
2009 I -Codes or amendments , such as the
effective date of the residential sprinkler
requirement?
Does Council concur with staff presenting the
adopting ordinances for Council ' s consideration
on First and Second Readings ( September 7 ,
2010 and September 21 , 2010 , respectively) with
an effective date of October 1 , 2010?
22
try