Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 07/17/2007 - CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM THE JUN ITEM NUMBER: 3 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY DATE: July 17, 2007 STORMWATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE STAFF: Wanda Krajicek SUBJECT Consideration and Approval of the Minutes of the June 19, 2007 Meeting. June 19, 2007 STORMWATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE BOARD A meeting of the StormwaterUtility Enterprise Board was held on Tuesday, June 19,2007 at 10:50 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City of Fort Collins City Hall. Roll Call was answered by the following Boardmembers: Brown, Hutchinson, Manvel, Ohlson, Poppaw, Roy and Troxell. Staff Members Present: Atteberry, Krajicek, Roy. Ordinance No. 008, Authorizing the Issuance of City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Stormwater Utility Enterprise, Storm Drainage Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2007, in the Maximum Aggregate Principal Amount of$21,820,000, in the Stormwater Utility Fund. The following is staff's memorandum on this item. "FINANCIAL IMPACT In 1997, the City issued$9,465,000 of Storm Drainage Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds (the "Bonds'), and in 1999, the City issued$19,980,000 of Storm Drainage Revenue Bonds (the "Bonds'). The Bonds provide for a special call(early payment) of the Bonds in 2007. The 1997 Bonds to be refunded carry interest rates that range from 4.7%to 5.2501o, and the 1999 Bonds to be refunded carry interest rates that range from 4.75% to 5.25%. Interest rates are currently at relatively low historic rates. The proposed refunding, at current market rates, will be below 4.25%; however, the final rate will be a function of the market and is subject to change. Over the remaining term of the bonds, and at the current market rate, the savings is estimated to be approximately $820,000 in present value terms. This estimate is subject to final interest rates. The savings will accrue to the Stormwater Utility Fund through lower debt service payments from 2007 through 2019. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Fort Collins and its Stormwater Utility Enterprise have issued bonds to fund needed capital improvements that provide a storm drainage service to property owners within the city. In 1997 and 1999, the City issued$9,465,000 and$19,980,000, respectively, to provide funding for capital improvements in various stormwater basins within the city. According to the provisions of the bonds, all or a portion of the 1997 bonds are eligible to be refinanced, and a portion of the 1999 bonds are eligible to be refinanced. The city will be paying off higher cost bonds with new bonds that will have much lower interest rates. The refunding Bonds in this Ordinance will likely carry interest rates under 4.2591o, but the final rates will be a function of the market and are subject to change. " City Manager Atteberry stated the bonds are a refinance that will save the Stormwater Utility approximately$750,000. The terms are not being extended for this refinancing;it will still be within the original time frame. 42 June 19, 2007 Councilmember Ohlson made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Manvel,to adopt Ordinance No. 008 on First Reading. Councilmember Ohlson expressed his desire for the Stormwater Utility to examine rainfall standards. He believed the current rainfall standards were an overreaction to the flood of 1997 and it appeared the current standards had led to the highest stormwater fees for individuals and businesses in the country. Spending those fees had led to projects that were overengineered and overbuilt, too expensive and were environmentally destructive. A previous Council increased the standards. For example, when completed, the Red Fox Meadow Project, which is part of a $20 million project, because of the rainfall standards, on both sides of Taft Hill Road at Prospect will look like a moonscape. Ten thousand loads of dirt will be removed from the area, stripping it to make large, dry basin detention areas. This project is proceeding because of the current rainfall standards. He wanted to examine the policy of the rainfall standards before beginning the project which would turn a natural area and stormwater area into a moonscape. The rainfall standards have impacts on development and the environment. He did not believe the Red Fox Meadow Project needed to proceed as it was overkill and unnecessary. City Manager Atteberry stated reassessing the rainfall standards is a two-year process, including much consulting work and getting FEMA approval and will require much information gathering. At Councilmember Ohlson's request, he will bring the $20 million Red Fox Meadow Project to Council for its approval. It is a very important flood control project and when the project is completed, the area will be an improved natural area. Councilmember Brown asked if the project would be a barren landscape when completed. Councilmember Ohlson stated the project would clear the area of current vegetation and is an unnecessary project that is based on the current rainfall standards. The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: Brown,Hutchinson, Manvel, Ohlson, Poppaw,Roy and Troxell. Nays: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 11:05 p.m. Mayor, Ex Officio President ATTEST: City Clerk, Ex Officio Secretary 43