HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 08/24/2010 - CONTINUATION OF THE DISCUSSION FROM THE AUGUST 10, DATE: August 24, 2010 WORK SESSION ITEM
STAFF: Joe Frank FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL
Pre-taped staff presentation: available
at fcgov.com/clerk/agendas.php
SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION
Continuation of the Discussion from the August 10, 2010 Work Session on Plan Fort Collins:
Phase 2 —Vision, Policy Choices, and Proposed Directions.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Plan Fort Collins planning process is currently midway through the second of three phases.
Phase 2 focuses on refining the vision, policy choices and preferred directions for the revisions
to City Plan and the Transportation Master Plan.
On July 27 and August 10, 2010, Council discussed and provided comments on most of the
Policy Choices Needing More Direction and Discussion. Due to the lateness of the August 10
work session, Council decided to continue the discussion to the August 24 work session on
policy "LIV 10-A: Carry Forward Existing Policies Related to Poudre River Corridor
Activities". Council also wanted to discuss concerns, if any, with the list of Policy Choices to
Carry Forward and Refine.
GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED
1. Does Council have comments and/or direction on "LIV I O-A: Carry Forward Existing
Policies Related to Poudre River Corridor Activities"? (See page 11 of the July 27 work
session Agenda Item Summary)
2. Does Council agree with the list of Policy Choices to Carry Forward and Refine
("consent" policies)? (See listing in Part C of the July 27 Agenda Item Summary
(Attachment 1) starting on page 15.)
BACKGROUND
Attached is the Agenda Item Summary from the July 27, 2010 work session (Attachment 1).
Council previously received all of the attachments as part of the July 27 work session packet and
should be referred to for the August 24 work session. Also, staff has prepared the attached
checklist (Attachment 4) that should be useful in Council's consideration and discussion of the
Policy Choices to Carry Forward and Refine ("consent"policies).
Staff would particularly appreciate Councilmembers letting the City Manager's Office
know prior to the August 24 work session,which if any, of the "consent" policy choices that
August 24, 2010 Page 2
are being recommended "to carry forward and refine" Council intends to discuss. This
will help staff plan for the appropriate resources being at the work session.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Work Session Agenda Item Summary (without attachments) - July 27, 2010
2. Work Session Summary - August 10, 2010
3. Work Session Summary - July 27, 2010
4. Checklist—Policy Choices to Carry Forward and Refine
ATTACHMENT 1
DATE: July 27, 2010
STAFF: Joe Frank, WORK SESSION ITEM
Kathleen Bracke FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL
Ken Waido
Pre-taped staff presentation: available
at fcgov.com/clerWagendas.php
SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION ,
Plan Fort Collins: Phase 2 - Vision, Policy Choices', and Proposed Direction.
JL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Plan Fort Collins planning process is currently midway through the second of three phases.
Phase 2 started in mid-April and is scheduled to be concluded in September. Phase 2 focuses on
refining the vision, policy choices, and preferred direction for the revisions to City Plan and the
Transportation Master Plan by exploring a range of possible plan choices and reporting on the
consequences and tradeoffs of the policy choice options to the community. The policy choices focus
on ways the City can achieve the 7i'ion/of a World-Glass Community, building upon previous
planning efforts,addressing challenges and opportunities,and offering new ideas that were identified
in Phase 1 _ A it
The policy choices in the Vision, Policy Choices, and Proposed Directions(6/23/10)document have
been evaluated using triple bottom line screening indicators that evaluate the costs and benefits of
the choices in terms of economic sustainability,quality of life,and environmental stewardship. Over
the next few months, the choices will be refined and narrowed to those that the City Council and
community believes are the right directions for the community's future. These choices will serve
as the foundation for writing a new City Plan and Transportation Master Plan that will begin this
fall. (�
GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND,SPECIFjIC-6UZ IONS TO BE ANSWERED
1L 1L
The Plan Fort Collins Project Management Team is seeking input and direction from the City
Council on the policy choices and directions; in particular,focusing Council's input on those policy
choices where there is no clear cut consensus or agreement, as further described below:
1. Does Council have comments and/or direction on the list of Policy Choices Needing More
Discussion and Direction? (See table in Part B starting on page 5.)
2. Does Council agree wi h thelist of=Roll- -Choices to Carry Forward and Refine? (See
listing in Part C starting on page0�15.)
3. Does Council have commentsrand/or�direction on a definition of sustainability? (See Draft
Sustainability Definition in Attachment 6.)
July 27, 2010 Page 2
BACKGROUND
The Vision, Policy Choices, and Proposed Directions (6/23/10) document (see Attachment 1) is a
major step within Phase 2 of the Plan Fort Collins planning process and includes the following
sections:
1. Community Vision in Focus-reflects the new organization for Plan Fort Collins,and offers
a set of vision directions to achieve a World Class Community.
n � 7 2. New Policy Choices—a series of questions, organized by the seven key topic areas that the
community should explore,discuss,and analyze to arrive at meaningful preferred directions
for the plans. Many of the City s core'valuesland policies arewell-established and supported
by the community and are not being considered for change, and thus are not included in the
Vision, Policy Choices, and Proposed Direction document. The plans and policies that are
being considered to remain are listed in the Carrying Forward Existing Goals, Principles,
and Policies document (see Attachment 7).
The Vision, Policy Choices, and Proposed Direction (6/23/10) document contains a Summary
Analysis sustainability matrix within each of the topic areas where every key policy choice was
evaluated based on its economic„social, and- nvirorimentaliimpacts. There is also a discussion for
each key policy to add clarity to the evaluations contained in�the�Summary Analysis sustainability
matrix. � �� 1J I•,`�
In addition, during'the May 25, 2010, work session on City Plan, Councilmembers asked for a
discussion around the definition of the term"sustainability. There are existing City "definitions"
and value statements in the current City Plan document,in the Vision, Policy Choices, and Proposed
Directions document, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Sustainability Reports, and the 2004
Sustainability Action Plan. There is also a draft definition(Attachment 6)prepared by City staff for
consideration by the Council during the July 27 work session.
Shaping the Future Commu itty'Wdrks hops,(June=29,a\_'30�2010) and Online Forum
The first broad, general public review f the vision and—dlJJk)ey policy choices occurred during the two
workshops held on June 29 (evening)a nd�June�301(morning)4Attendees at the workshops could
choose to attend several break-out sessions and provide responses to questions on the policy choices.
In most cases, the questions asked for the degree of support, or nonsupport, of each policy. There
was also key pad polling of the attendees on several visualizations showing gradual changes for
prototypical infill and redevelopment sites and green streets. Over 150 people participated in the
workshops. The morning and evening events also included an "expo' of City services, as well as
specific workshop sessions on the"Resourcing Our Future"and"Budgeting For Outcomes"projects.
In addition, the community was invited to view online presentations and to complete an online
questionnaire on the policy cho c s�At achment 3A<summa iz s the,responses to the questions from
the June 29/30 workshops and online polling on specific topics; Attachment 3B summarizes the
responses from the opening session key pad polf�ing; and Attachment 3C summarizes written
comments received on the proposed-Community Vision duringithe "expo' portion of the meeting.
July 27, 2010 Page 3
Boards and Commissions Involvement
Members of City advisory boards and commissions were invited to attend the June 29 and 30
workshops. In addition, board and commission members were asked to participate in an online
survey,and their responses were collected separately from the public responses(see Attachment 31)).
Boards and commissions were also asked to provide comments directly to the City Council. Several
boards/commission provided comments, which are included in Attachment 4.
Focus Group Meetings
A second round of focus groupCas 1nduc�Julppart off- hase 2. These meetings covered:
Land Use.and Transportation; Econ miAealt., Ennw'ironmental (water/air/energy); Poudre River;
and Sustainability (definition/measurement).
The purpose of each focus group was to help narrow the policy choices and determine the preferred
directions. The groups also began to discuss implementation strategies. Focus group input is
contained in Attachment 5.
Vision, Policy Choices,and Directions
Tom
The Plan Fort Collins Project ManagemenfTea�m has.reviewed the esponses from the meetings and
workshops, as well as online comments ' Man 1 of the=policy�choices and directions are generally
supported by members of the com�mu ity, and thej�stakeholders who participated in the outreach
efforts, and will likely be able to be incorporated into the Plan updates. However, there are a few
key choices where respondents are divided, and these policy choices will need more discussion
before a direction can be determined. The following sections are a summary of the feedback
received to date on the key choices:
Part A. Summary of Feedback, contains a general summary of comments received to date,
organized by the seven vision topics of Plan Fort Collins;
PartB. Policy Choices Needing More ,iect�ionan`Discussion contains the list of vision topics
from the policy choices that need more uiscussiori an��direction from City Council; and
Ji J [
Part C. Policy Choices to Carry Forward and Refine, is a list of policy choices that do not
appear to need additional discussion and direction from City Council at this point, but
will be refined as the Plan Fort Collins planning process moves forward.
PART A. SUMMARY OF FEEDBACK
This section includes a brief summary of recent feedback on different policy choices, starting with
the Vision and through the seven vision topics and vision directions. The page numbers correspond
to the Vision, Policy Choices, and Proposed Directionsdoc men(Attachment 1):
July 27, 2010 Page 4
Community Vision (pages 3-6)
In general, comments received reflect a high level of support for the draft Vision and seven vision
topics and vision directions,with some suggested refinements. Respondents also expressed strong
support for incorporating sustainability and the triple bottom line concept into Plan Fort Collins.
However,opinions are mixed about the definition of sustainability for Fort Collins and how the City
should apply the triple bottom line model to assist decision-making and monitoring of progress of
the plans over time. Staff is seeking direction from Council on a definition of sustainability.
Economic Health (pages 11-22p
Comments reflect that this topicQs impo ant andisa determining factor for overall community
vitality. In general, comments show strong support for the City's continuing emphasis on primary
job creation, support for local businesses,and support for additional parking in the downtown area,
as needed. There is less support for the retail retention and recruitment, and workforce training
policies. There is some sentiment that the County Workforce Center and the private and educational
sectors are better able to address workforce training needs of unemployed people.
Environmental Resources (pages 23-40)
m /P�\ r- Tr In
In general, feedback supports carrygkforward mos of the enviromental resources choices—with
support for the energy choices',
support�forfwaste reduction and diversion from landfills,
general support for the stormwater treatment choices (with some questions addressed in Part B),
support for water resource choices, support for adapting to climate change, and general support for
the multi-purpose open lands policy direction. Respondents expressed cautions about potentially
inappropriate uses on open spaces(e.g.,motorized uses). Questions and refinements are addressed
in Parts B and C.
Community and Neighborhood Livability (pages 41-60)
In general, respondents support the current Structure Plan and emphasis on the City's "spine"
(Mason/College Corridor) with e�highe usr pport�for�ac`t vvity ec nters. The comments are also
supportive of taller buildings than currently exist in speeific activity centers, such as the Midtown
d iegler, Drake�Road and Timberline Road, in the Area, Harmony Road at College/M—anon
downtown, and in the Campus West area. The comments show very strong support for
redevelopment and infill strategies,with some support for better neighborhood transitions between
activity centers/corridors and established neighborhoods. Respondents generally support or are
neutral about the gateway policies and projects, although many note concerns about costs and
relative importance. In addition, the comments support "nature-friendly" treatments in new
developments,and generally support the current policy direction for the Cache la Poudre River near
the downtown, which restricts development in the floodplain and includes limits on urban
development near the River.
Safety and Wellness (pages 61r_67�)'
The comments strongly support maintaining current levels of service for community safety. In
addition, the respondents support increased emphasis on active lifestyles and healthy living, better
access to health and human services, and local agriculture and locally-produced food.
July 27, 2010 Page 5
Culture, Parks, and Recreation (pages 69-75)
The comments generally support enhanced emphasis on arts and culture promotion and funding. The
respondents are interested in linking arts and culture more strongly with economic development
efforts and exploring formation of a Science and Cultural Facilities District. They also appear to
support adaptation of, enhancements to, and improved coordination among parks, recreation
facilities/programs,and open space areas to address changing demographics and community needs.
Transportation (pages 77-91)
Tos �1�7
The comments generally support the `m 1ddle Qpt '�wrthi I the range of transportation system
choices presented(from servicetred_a�ctionk`to x landing the longiterm vision). The choices with the
highest levels of support include focus on activity centers and Enhanced Travel Corridors, vehicle
alternatives and trails,system and mobility management,and pursuing the adopted long-term vision.
Respondents also strongly support increasing transportation investments and have a variety of ideas
about possible funding approaches. Because many of the transportation topics are interrelated and
could be combined, further discussion of which choices to carry forward and refine will be
necessary.
Community feedback regarding the update to the City's Pedestrian Plan which is an element of the
77
overall Transportation Master�Plan continues to be positive and supportive of new ideas and
techniques to better serve pedestrians of all ages and abilities throughout the community. There is
interest in exploring ideas about designat ng WalkiL as a primary mode of travel in key activity
centers such as the downtown and for improving pedestrian linkages to transit stops and other
destinations.
High Performing Community (pages 93-99)
In general, the comments reflect support for the choices presented under this topic, including
collaborative problem solving,effective governance,and enhanced communications and technology.
PART B. POLICY CHOIC (E/S'NEED1/If NG Mot E , IRECTION
The planning team is seeking direction fir m the)Cilty' Counci on a definition of sustainability and
`Z�// Z L
the policy choices listed in the table below. Please note that some of the policy choices are more
implementation-focused and could be deferred until later meetings (e.g., air quality strategies),
whereas other topics are major drivers for Plan Fort Collins (e.g., transportation resourcing and
investments). During the July 27 work session,Council may want to prioritize items(e.g.,"top five"
topics) for discussion rather than proceed item by item through the table. The planning team is
particularly interested in hearing feedback on the following topics addressed in the table below in
order to understand how to proceed with Plan Fort Collins:
• Sustainability Definitio7(EH3-A
• Land Ready for Busin� and B)
• it
Stormwater Conveyance`m Public Streets ("Green Streets") (ENV8-A)
• Poudre River Corridor Activities and Protections (LIV 10-A)
July 27, 2010 Page 6
After discussion is completed on the above items, Council can proceed with a review of the other
policy choices in the table below. If all of the policy choices cannot be covered during the July 27
work session,the planning team will need Council's direction as to how proceed in order to complete
Council review of the policy choices.
Respondent Comments and Council Direction
Current Policy Staff Recommendation Sought
VISION AND SUSTAINABILITY
Sustainability Definition
• There are existing City Respondents show strong 1. Does Council have
definitions and value support�for'incorporating comments and/or
statements in the current sustainability and the triple direction on the draft
Ciry Plan document, in the bottom line concept into definition of
Vision, Policy Choices, Plan Fort Collins. sustainability? (See
and Proposed Direction However, opinions are . Attachment 6.)
document (Attachment 1, mixed about the definition
page 7), Global Reporting of sustainability for Fort
Initiative Sustainability Collins.
Reports, and the 2004 Staff has provided'a'draft
Sustainability Action Plan. definition f6r consideration
by Couricil.J (See 1 f
Attach ent-6-) J i
ECONOMIC HEALTH
EH2-A: Continue Retail Retention and Recruitment (p. 15)
• The City's Economic The respondents recognize 2. Should the Plan's
Action Plan supports a the importance of sales tax policies continue to
"balanced and targeted revenue to the City and that reaffirm retail
approach to business retail is part of a complete development and
retention, expansion, econo is healthstra etet gy. redevelopment along
incubation, and Differing}v�e�wstrevolve� the College and
attraction," (including arouund�t e geographic Harmony corridors?
retail) to further the areas(e.g., core areas and
economic health of the infill versus along I-25).
community. In general, responses are in
• Commercial zoning exists strong support of
at the Carpenter Road (CO redevelopment of Foothills
HWY 392), Mulberry Mall and implementation
Street, and Prospect Road of the Midtown
interchanges with I-25. Redevelopment strategies.
Commercial development/ Staff recom ernnds� F
at the Harmony Road/1-2 5 continuing to�pursue retail
interchange is under retention/anId recruitment as
consideration as part of part of the ce onomic
the amendment to the healthy strategy and
Harmony Corridor Plan. continuing to enhance and
July 27, 2010 Page 7
Respondent Comments and Council Direction
Current Policy Staff Recommendation --Sought
streamline the City's role,
in particular, emphasizing
retail development along
College and Harmony
corridors per the current
City Structure Plan and
adopted subarea%pl'ans:
EH3-A: Provide Land Ready.f�or.LargeEmploysers and
EH3-B: Incentives to Make Land Ready (p. 17)
• The City's Economic The respondents have 3. Should the Plan
Action Plan states, "be mixed opinions about include a policy
proactive on economic making land ready for new supporting City
issues and build partners business and targeted coordination and
with organizations and the employers. In general, involvement in
private sector to further opinions are supportive of working on an area
enhance economic health." retaining g
zonin for and district basis to
• Current practice is for the industry: Comments<note make land ready for
City to evaluate the impact some support for the City businesses that will
on the current inventory off assisting with-employer up- have a broader benefit
undeveloped employment front needs by coordinating to the community?
land of requested changes infrastructure and capital (Note: more
to convert employment projects and taking part in discussion would be
land to other uses. Current providing Downtown needed regarding
analysis of vacant land parking facilities. implementation,
indicates that the City has Retaining land zoned for including exactly how
enough land zoned for employment is also the City might
employment, including supported. Questions- 7- facilitate
land appropriate for the su round�t e.LCil"s lev�el�of infrastructure
City's targeted industry effort and funds g andl, improvements such as
clusters. providing support for-at stormwater drainage,
variety of business types. water and sewer
Some of the negative utilities, and street
feedback may be tied to improvements and
specific wording, such as discussion about
"large employers" and incentives.)
"incentives".
• Staff recommends that the
policy choices-be combined-
to/ an area and`
district-basis role of the
City inshelping to make..
land ready for business,
rather than wording that
July 27, 2010 Page 8
Respondent Comments and Council Direction
Current Policy Staff Recommendation Sought
suggests a more speculative
approach to assisting
businesses. Staff also
proposes removing the
focus on large businesses.
ENVIRONMENTALRESO,('RCES 'VY
Air Quality ENV 4-A: Employ Price Mechanisms (to reduce miles driven) (p. 29)
• City Plan states: Tf�rrrice mechanism 4. Should price
"Continually improve Fort policy is an existing City mechanisms to reduce
Collins' air quality as the Plan policy put forward for VMT continue to be
City grows." community discussion. part of the air quality
• "Principle ENV-2: The Price mechanisms include, policy update
City will reduce total but are not limited to, the discussion, which will
motor vehicle emissions of following: incentives to include additional
high priority pollutants by use alternative modes, public outreach and
focusing on both location efficient Council input later
technology(tailpipe mortgages, pay 7as-y u� this summer and fall?
emissions) and behavior (Vi e i/jurance, etc. For Any suggested
(driving patterns). both-the price-mechanisms changes to air quality
• Policies that follow and alternative policies, including the
Principle ENV-2 include: transportation fuels policy price mechanism
Actions of Vehicle Miles choices, the respondents policy, will feed into
Traveled (ENV-2.1), have divided opinions. the Plan Fort Collins
Actions on VMT (ENV There is general support for process in a timely
2.2), Price Mechanisms the City to be a leader in manner.
(ENV 2.3), and Actions on these areas, although some
Tailpipe Emissions (ENV((:==.I/particip\tslnote,
2.4). reservations about the
City's role an whether
these=actioas'would be
better accomplished
through private sector or
other governmental
initiatives (e.g., federal).
• Staff recommends
broadening and clarifying
policy language to consider
incentives andzprograms-as-
part of the air quality policy
Update discussion.ion.
July 27, 2010 Page 9
Respondent Comments and Council Direction
Current Policy Staff Recommendation Sought
ENV6-A: Reduce Carbon Intensity and Consumption (p. 31)
• City Plan does not address The respondents have 5. Should the Plan
consumption or local food divided opinions on this include a policy
production. topic, with the majority regarding reducing
• It contains policies supporting reducing carbon carbon intensity and
regarding reducing• intensity and-consumptionT consumption?
greenhouse gas emissions, and a smaller group who Ao
which need to be updated l not support Ithe policy1v
to reflect the more current\ direction .Some would_like
Climate Action Plan. to understand more about
• The Climate Action Plan the upfront costs, regional
(CAP) (2008) includes nature of the issue, and
carbon reduction goals to uncertainty about the
reduce community-wide science.
greenhouse gas emissions Staff recommends that this
by 20% below 2005 levels policy choice not be carried
by 2020 and 80% by 2050. forward the-Climate
AZtion Plan already�v
addresses greenhouse gas
emissions and.other new
policy directions that
address other parts of that
objective. If it is kept in
the Plan it will need
clarification and more
discussion about
implementation strategies.
Stormwater ENV8-A: Expand Opportunities for Stormwater Treatment and Conveyance
in Public Streets;ENV 9-A: Improve S�tormwate Quality and Conveyance;and ENV IO-A:
Increase Stormwater partnerships(p 33• 5)'
• The City does not The respondents generally' 6. Should the Plan
currently have a policy support a"Green Streets" include a policy to
support for "green streets" option (stormwater allow"Green Streets"
or street standards that. treatment and conveyance as an option for
allow it. in streets and other uses of stormwater
• Stormwater plans the parkway areas and management?
currently address life medians of streets).
safety protection for Ad'diti'onal discussion is 7. Should the Plan
people and reduction of needed about potential include policies to
damage to structures due increase�d�costs, � support regional
to flooding, quality main enance�and long-term stormwater basins
streams, rivers, and water viability. Similarly, the and partnerships to
resources. respondents have questions address stormwater
July 27, 2010 Page 10
Respondent Comments and Council Direction
Current Policy Staff Recommendation Sought
• The City has a goal to related to the enhanced quality and
provide restoration of 21 stormwater quality through conveyance in areas
miles of streams to more regional basins and where traditional
naturalized conditions by partnerships. Questions approaches are
2035. relate to possible increased difficult to
• 21st Century Goals strive land requirements, cost, implement? (Note:
to treat all new or and�impacts cn-developable Additional discussion
redeveloped properties land. ll w will occur at the
with a Stormwater Best Staff recommends that the August 24th Council
Management Practice by "GreenStreets" option-be work session
2035. included in the Plan and regarding the issue of
• See also Transportation explored in more detail floodplain regulations
Choice T1-B: Reshaping during the implementation costs and benefits).
Existing Streets, which phase. For example, street
refers to "Green Streets." standards will need
modification and more
research about costs,
ma intenance—,-and long—tern"
abilrtyis necessary.
COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD LIVABILITY POLICY CHOICES
LIV7-A: Identify Neighborhoods where Protective Measures are Needed (p. 55—56)
City Plan states: Respondents have divided 8. Should the Plan
• Goal: "Our community opinions about identifying continue to include
will encourage additional neighborhoods policies that promote
preservation of existing for protective measures and neighborhood
housing." conservation. Some are conservation?
• "Policy HSG-2.4: con cerned`about,protecting Detailed
Preservation of existinglneighborhoods�and implementation
Neighborhoods. The City historic properties, yetlthe strategies should be
will attempt to retain com is reflect thatJJmany refined through
existing affordable may be unaware of existing subarea plans that
housing stock through protective measures. There address the issue.
conservation efforts of are also concerns about
older residential over-regulation of older
neighborhoods." (not historic) properties and
• "Principle HSG-3: interest in letting the
Neighborhood stability market drive
must be maintained and redevelopment,and�
enhanced." conservation'• Policy EXN-1.1 —"No Staff recommends the City
�\ . // I t
significant changes to the continue with-curren
character of existing policies with
residential developments
July 27, 2010 Page 11
Respondent Comments and Council Direction
Current Policy Staff Recommendation Sought
will be initiated by City implementation refined
Plan...The character of through subarea plans.
stable residential
neighborhoods should be
protected..."
LIVIO-A: Carry Forward Exist ni g Pdh es,,Rela ed to Poudre River Corridor Activities
and Protections (p. 59)
• Current policies and The respondents generally 9. Should the Plan carry
regulations protect most support existing City forward existing
areas along the river near policies and plans that policies for the Cache
the downtown and define address the relationship of la Poudre River(as
acceptable river-related the Poudre River to the noted in the first
land uses and design (e.g., Downtown. Some column)?
a buffer, stabilized bank, comments express desire
and stepped back for some urban edge
buildings). development in specific
• // ' ) �1
Floodplain regulations locations with publics
minimize development in access or great j 1�
the 100-year floodplain ��clarifcafiori in the natural
but do not prohibit buffer area for the Poudre
development. River. Other comments
• A handful of properties are suggest maintaining a river
eligible for corridor that is as natural as
development—they have possible. (Note: This
not been conserved for LIV 10-A Poudre River
open space or are already choice also relates to the
developed. water olicy choices in the
Env�nment la Reso ru ce�
11 1.1 1 1 i j �r
section (EI I\—M and.\ V
12')Xw ch rJceived gj'Aeral
support.)
• Additional discussion will
occur at the August 24th
Council work session
regarding the issue of
floodplain regulations.
Staff will prepare
recommendations based on
rriplle bottom line
outcomes.
July 27, 2010 Page 12
Respondent Comments and Council Direction
Current Policy Staff Recommendation Sought
SAFETY AND WELLNESS
SW3-A: Support Healthy Living (p. 65)
• City Plan does not contain The respondents generally 10. Should the Plan
goals or policies regarding support City education and support continued
healthy living. coordination to promote City coordination on
h lthy�living but opihi d�ss and education about
are mixed about whether opportunities for
the City;should play a role healthy living?
m education. Some are
interested in expanding this
policy direction to include
coordination with
alternative and mental
health care providers.
• Staff has not formulated a
recommendation on this
to ic.
i
SW 5-A: Support Local Agriculture and Food Production (p. 66)
• City Plan does not The.respondents have 'r Should the Plan
mention local agriculture expressed strong support support promoting
or food production. for local agriculture and local agriculture and
food production, especially food production on
on private properties. City-owned
Opinions are mixed about properties?
the City's role and level of
involvement on City-
owned.properties.
Staff recorr'mend's f1he7
exploration lof whethery
local agriculture (and
water) and food production
is appropriate on City-
owned properties and, if so,
what types of properties.
TRANSPORTATION
Tl-B: Reshape Existing Streets (p. 81-82)
• The Transportation The comments reflect 12. Should the Plan
�1� r��
Master Plan provides mixed reactions to the support reshaping
context for this question'm concept Jof reshaping1, streets and context-
policies TC-4.6 Facility eXisting streets over time to sensitive street
Design, "Facility design emphasize lower vehicle standards to address
will support all modes of. seeds and accommodate multiple needs
July 27, 2010 Page 13
Respondent Comments and Council Direction
Current Policy Staff Recommendation Sought
transportation and be walking, bicycling, and including stormwater,
matched to appropriately transit, with concerns about and "tailored" for
support the surrounding the tradeoff between different areas of the
development," and maintaining capacity for community and levels
policies that address a vehicles and enhancing of service for
balanced and integrated adjacent uses. There has walking, bicycling,
network of transportation been interest and support transit, and vehicle
corridors (TC-1.2 and TC- for more flexible�street capacity?
1.3). �l designs to better fit re fit the
• Policy ETC-1.2 Facility \ context(adjacent landluses)
Design also notes that and for exploring "Green
facilities will be matched Streets" concepts to
to appropriately support integrating stormwater
surrounding development. treatment and other uses of
• Policy T-1.10 Context the parkway areas and
Sensitive Design. The medians.
intent of the policy is to Staff recommends
ensure that transportation �1 continuing the discussion
to \\
projects not only move regarding potential new
vehicles, bikes, and street design
pedestrians safely, but are techniques/treatments as-
sensitive to the well as implications for
environmental, scenic, costs for capital,
aesthetic, and historic operations, and
values of the area. maintenance, as noted in
However, existing street the stormwater policy
standards tend to be choices.
uniform and require a
"one-size fits all"
approach to sizing streets 0
despite the context of the
street and currently do not
�(,Z-�/
offer design flexibility.
T1-D: Vehicle Alternatives/Trails (p. 84)
• City Plan and the The comments reflect 13. Should the Plan
Transportation Master general support for support enhancing
Plan (TMP) both address recognizing the need to trails as part of the
trails as primarily expand trail use for transportation system,
recreational in purpose. transportation as w 1I as beyond their current
• In TMP Policy TC 2.42 e c reational p,urposesV recreational purpose?
mg h"Corridors are the linkowever1there are concerns
elements of the City" abo to divert ni g already
including the Poudre limited resources to vehicle
July 27, 2010 Page 14
Respondent Comments and Council Direction
Current Policy Staff Recommendation Sought
River Corridor). The TMP alternatives and trails, as
goals also state that the well as need to address
City will provide access to potential conflicts between
major activity centers and new types of motorized
destinations by building vehicles and non-motorized
on combinations of travel within the on-street
existing and planned and -off street'transli rtatiori
commuter and recreational system-)) fu \
facilities. Staff recommends further
explorahon2of this topicL
and identify potential trail
linkages and new design
standards for trails and/or
on-street facilities to
address safety and
accessibility concerns for
multiple types of trail users.
T2-A: Increase Transportation Investments)to Achieve Goals (p. 89)
• Currently, TMP Policy T-\ The c rnm yity opposes 14. Should the Plan
10.2 Funding states that reducing transportation explore new tools to
the City will continue to service to fit within achieve more reliable
actively pursue all diminishing resources (e.g., long-term funding
available long-term, less maintenance, transit sources for capital
consistent funding frequency, roadway system improvements and
mechanisms from federal, improvements), and operations and
state, and local sources to supports increasing maintenance for all
implement and maintain a transportation investments modes of
multi-modal transportation. toachieve transportation transportation?
system and travel demand goals. New ideas are
management program. emerging aA t possible
• Financing tools under funding sources that would
discussion (in Attachment be more reliable over time
1, page 89) include: and less dependent on
• Sales Tax (existing external factors; questions
source) about the potential revenue
o Property Tax (existing generation from each of the
source) various types of funding
o Auto Ownership Taxes sources; and ideas about
�, �r . �
(existing source) needing to package various
• Bicycle Ownership fir;ding-) urces to achieve
Taxes (new source) ours goals. Commentsyary
o Impact Fees (existing regarding how much
source) additional investment is
July 27, 2010 Page 15
Respondent Comments and Council Direction
Current Policy Staff Recommendation Sought
o Tax Increment Funding needed to maintain existing
(new source) system as compared with
o Transportation Utility needs for expansion of
or Maintenance Fees system and services. This
(new source) topic is also closely related
o Pricing and User Fees to the current Budgeting for
(new source) Outcomes"anil Resourcirig7
o Local District Our Future discussions
Assessments (new Staff recommends 1
source) continu ng-thte discussion
• Negotiated Agreements regarding potential
with CSU and/or transportation investment
Neighboring strategies to support
Communities (existing existing and planned
and new sources). capital and
operations/maintenance
needs and to explore more
relia151e,long=term-funding
tools.
PART C. POLICY CHOICES'TO�CARRY FORWARD - D REFINE
In addition to current City Plan and Transportation Master Plan goals and policies that have been
identified to carry forward as is or with non-substantive refinements, and other current policies and
values identified in the Snapshot Report that need to be brought into alignment with Plan Fort
Collins, the following is a list of new policy topics that participants during this process appear to
support—particularly during recent outreach efforts. The planning team does not believe that City
Council needs to discuss each topic individually, unless Council desires to do so, and is asking for
permission to carry forward and refine the entire list as;part of the Plan Fort Collins draft revisions
to City Plan and the Transpor atao�Master
tosevel'oped in upcoming months.
Community Vision (pages 3-6)
• Vision Refinement—Strengthen the economic health vision directions and clarify and refine
terms within each of the topic areas to reflect the proposed policy directions.
• Sustainability— Carrying forward the triple bottom line concept and further refining it and
work on the triple bottom line integrated model.
Economic Health (pages 11-22)
• EH1-A: Pririmary Job Crea tion� orate eTmp asio�,4j creation. More discussion is
needed regarding specific implementation strategies and role of the City.
• EH4-A: Local Businesses, ncou�iageglocallbusiness,-continuing the Shop Fort Collins First
program.
July 27, 2010 Page 16
• EH5-A: Workforce Trainine — Continue coordination and partnerships with the Larimer
County Workforce Center and other organizations for workforce training. The City should
not take a lead role in assisting workforce training of the unemployed.
Environmental Resources (pages 23-40)
• ENV1-A, ENV2-A, ENV3-A: Enemy Policies — Reduce net energy use; modernize the
electric grid,and improve the energy performance of existing buildings. Continue to explore
voluntary versus mandatory_measures with comments expressing more favor for voluntary
measures) and carefully con der upp-fr nt costs long-term benefits.
Ir it Ii )i v,a
• ENV7-A: Waste Reduction—Continue wasteTeduction and diversion efforts,provided that
they are generally voluritary"easures. I I
1�
• ENV 1 l-A,ENV 12-A,ENV 13-A: Water Policies—Address balanced water supply planning
and conservation,a resilient Cache la Poudre River,and adapting to climate change through
the Water Demand and Supply Policy Plan 2010 update.
• ENV 14-A: Open Lands — Continue partnerships and strategic planning for multi-purpose
open lands that enhance and restore streams, improve water quality, provide and enhance
trail corridors,enhance wildlife and aquatic habitat, allow for agriculture and water for food
production, provide parks and recreational purposes, and achieve other aims. Refine the
terminology related to open land 11
Community and Neighborhood2vab(llity (pages' '44-'60)
• LIV 1-13, LIV 1-C: Structure Plan—Emphasize the activity centers and the City's "spine"
with strong connections between activity centers and Mason/College corridors.
• LIV2-A: Allowable Building Heights — Allow and encourage taller buildings in activity
centers and along the spine (with the currently allow four to five stories generally being an
ideal height except for in Downtown).
• LIV3-A: Redevelopment and Infill Strategies-Support redevelopment and infill. Continue
to explore the specific implementation strategies proposed.
• LIV4-A: City Gateways—Support City gateways,but as a relatively lower priority item due
to concerns about potentiallcco`s`ts. Explore possible of cations for priority future gateways
(possibly I-25 and Harmony and I-2\5 anJN4ulberry)an, racket potential elements of future
gateways. \�/ ji
• LIV5-A: Neighborhood Transitions—Refine neighborhood transition standards, especially
those related to transitions in height and use, and spacing between new and existing
development.
• LIV6-A: Mix of Housing Types— Provide a mix of housing types to meet the needs of a
diverse population. Explore ways to protect stable neighborhoods and to factor in changing
demographics.
• LIV8-A: Affordable Housing —Maintain existing affordable housing programs at current
levels.
• LIV9-A: Alternative Land acs pe,T,r tae ments 7—Modify landscaping standards to allow and
encourage"nature friendly" to gll rass anther water-intensive landscaping;
hard surfaced swales, etc. �IJ
July 27, 2010 Page 17
Safety and Wellness (pages 61-67)
• SW I-B: Community Safety—Maintain current levels of service for community safety. Note:
Provide more information about current levels of safety and emergency response times.
• S W2-A: Active Lifes , les—Continue to provide and expand opportunities for residents to
lead active lifestyles.
• S W4-A: Health and Human Services Access—Improve access to health and human service
providers. Emphasize regional coordination and access to traditional and alternative health
care providers.
` P oc �SW5-A: Support Local�Alture anFoo Production
Culture, Parks, and Recreation,(pages I69-75))
• CPRI-A: Arts and Culture Promotion—Promote and continue to integrate arts and culture.
Explore formation of an arts council.
• CPR3-A: Parks Adaptation—Promote new and different types of parks and multi-purpose
parks and open space areas. Continue discussions about types of parks and multi-use spaces
desired, including possible pocket parks and a kayak park.
• CPR4-A: Recreation Enhancements—Coordinate to enhance recreational programming and
pursue multi-purpose facilities in the future.
Transportation (pages 77-91)
0 P VJL
• T 1-C: Enhanced Travel Corridors/District Focus—Focus City investments along Enhanced
Travel Corridors(ETC)and inactivity centers. Continue discussions about where to"jump-
start"these long-standing policies, and how to prioritize them.
• TI-E: System Management and Mobility Mana ement — Focus on maximizing the
effectiveness of current systems, and combine this practice with other transportation
directions.
• T I-F: Adopted Long-Term Vision—Maintain the current long-term vision for a multi-modal
transportation system. Seek opportunities to include more local and regional connections
(trails, transit, roadways)�rp
High Performing Community( n. P V
(pages 93-99
• HI1-A: Collaborative Problem Solving—Involve citizens and forge partnerships at a local
and regional level. Explore opportunities for collaboration nationally and globally.
• H12-A: Effective Local Governance — Continue to provide effective, representative
government. Explore new ideas about City Council representation(e.g., at-large members)
and underscore the need to include a range of voices.
HI3-A, Communications and Technology — Support robust community interaction and
explore expansion of communications technology as basic infrastructure. Explore impacts
on current technology serviceroviders:
July 27, 2010 Page 18
NEXT STEPS
Following the July 27 work session and direction from the City Council,the Plan Fort Collins team
will continue to work on refining the Vision and preferred policy directions that will serve as the
basis for preparing the updated City Plan and Transportation Master Plan documents this fall. The
team will continue to work with boards and commissions as the policy directions are refined,as well
as provide other opportunities for continued community input. The team has already begun the
process of refining the indicators that will be used to complete the triple bottom line model that will
be used to further evaluate policy directions as well as becoming part of the Plan Fort Collins
monitoring process that will be/'O'ngoing after plan adoption...
The primary emphasis of Phase 3, whicl�w�ll commence thy summer, is the identification of
implementation strategies and priorities as part of the draft Plan documents;and preparation of select
implementation actions(such as code revisions),following the adoption of the Plans.The next City
Council work sessions, are scheduled for October 26 and November 30, 2010, and will focus on
implementation strategies as well as the draft Plan documents, and the team will be seeking
Council's input on implementation'actions that should be a priority.
ATTACHMENTS 7--�� "7r 77'
1. Vision,Policy Choices, and Proposed Direction(6/23/10)document(this is the same version
as the one distributed to the-Co Council°on July=1.6).
2. City Council Work Session PowerPoint Presentation
3. Public Input Results
A. Summary of the responses to the questions from the June 29/30 workshops on
specific topics and on-line polling.
B. Summary of the responses from the June 29/30 opening session key pad polling
C. Summary of the comments received during the"expo"portion of the meeting on the
Vision
D. Summary of results`from board-n ommissio n members on-line polling
4. Board and Commission Comments
• Air Quality Advisory Board (Draft)
• Bike Advisory Committee�� Y
• Downtown Development Authority
• Electric Board
• Land Conservation and Stewardship Board
• Natural Resources Advisory Board
• Planning and Zoning Board
• Senior Advisory Board
• Water Board
• Transportation Board 5. Extended Focus Groups, Phase 2 Summary of)Input
6. Draft Sustainability Definition, 1\ JJ I 1
7. Carrying Forward Existing -rinciples, and Policies document (this is the same
version as the one distributed to the Council on July 16).
ATTACHMENT 2
City ®f Advance Planning
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
F6rt
Col-lins Fort 21.6s,C080522
970.221.8376
970.224.6111 -fax
tcgov.com/advanceplanning
August 11, 2010
t\'Iemorandum
TO: Mayor Hutchinson and City Council embers
TH: Darin Atteberry, City Manager
Diane Jones, Deputy City ManageAnt,
Karen Cumbo, Planning, Developnd Transportation Director
FM: Joe Frank, Advance Planning Direct`
Timothy Wilder, Senior City Plannefr�'
RE: Work Session Summary—August 10, 2010—Plan Fort Collins, Phase 2— Vision, Policy
Choices, and Proposed Directions
Work Session Participants:
Diane Jones, Deputy City Manager
Joe Frank, Advance Planning Department Director
John Stokes,Natural Resources Director
Jon Haukaas, Water Engineering Field Operations Manager
Josh Birks, Economic Advisor
Lucinda Smith, Senior Environmental Planner
Timothy Wilder, Senior City Planner
Megan Bolin, City Planner
Ben Herman, Clarion Associates
Direction Sou2ht/Ouestions to be Answered:
On July 27, 2010, the Council discussed and provided comments on the Vision and
Sustainability, and Transportation policy choices needing more direction.
This worksession was a continuation of that discussion, focusing on the remaining policy choices
needing more direction, including Economic Health, Environmental Resources, Stormwater,
Neighborhood and Community Livability, and Safety and Awareness. The general questions to
be addressed during the work session were:
1. Does Council have comments and/or direction on the following list of Policy Choices
rVeediti iVfore Discussion and Directiort?
City of
Fort Collins
• EH2-A: Continue Retail Retention and Recruitment
EH')-A: Provide Land Ready for Larger Employers
EH3-B: Incentives to Nlake Land Ready
■ E\V4-A: Employ Price -Mechanisms (to reduce miles tEriveni)
■ ENV6-A: Reduce Carbon Intensity and Consumption
■ E\tVS-A: Expand Opportunities for Stornmater Treatment and Conveyance
■ E\V9-_\: Improve Stortnwater Quality and Conveyance
• ENNIQ-A: Increase Stortnwater Partnerships
■ LIV7-A: Identitv \`eiLliborlioods Where Protective NlCasures are deeded
■ LIV10 .�: Carry Forward Existing Policies Related to the Poudre River Corridor
:Activities and Protections
■ SW')-A: Support Healthy Living
SW5-A: Support Local Atticuhure and Food Production
2. Does Council agree with the list of Policv Choices to C'crrry Forward and Refine'
Council's Discussion/Direction:
Council discussed the remaining priority topics on staff's recommended discussion list except for
LIb'10-.4. Carry fouard Geistin- Policies Related to the Pottdre Rimer Corridor :Activities and
Protections.
EH2-A: Continue Retail Retention and Recruitment
Question seeking Council direction: Should the Plan's policies continue to reaffinn retail
development and redevelopment along, the Colle`,e and Harmony corridors?
• There was general support for the staff recommendation to continue to pursue retail retention
and recruitment as part of the economic health strategy.
• Council wanted to ensure that staff upholds the City's high quality standards and quality of
review even when pursuing strategies such as streamlining of development.
• Hannon} Road %vas recognized as both an important retail and emplovment conidor.
EH')-A: Provide Land Readv for Larger Eniclovers
EH3-B: Incentives to Make Land Readv
Question seeking Council direction: Should the Plan include a policy supporting City
coordination and involvement in working, on an area and district basis to make land ready for
businesses that will have a broader benefit to the community?
• There were Council concerns as to the appropriate role of the City with providing
employment land.
• Council does not support the City acting as the developer to provide employment land.
• \Many Council members expressed a desire for a "delicate balance" between goyenument
involvement and the role of the private sector.
• Concern was expressed over utility ratepayers subsidizing private development.
,�rof
t� Collins
• Council members felt that government's role should be to remove major barriers and tracking
the inventory of employment land.
■ There was agreement that the policy language needed to be revised and clarified.
• Council would like to see a map of existing and planned employment land, and information
on vacant existing buildings that could accommodate employers.
ENV4-A: Employ Price Mechanisms (to reduce miles driven)
Question seeking Council direction: Should price mechanisms to reduce VMT continue to be
part of the air quality plan update discussion, which will include additional public outreach and
Council input later this summer and fall?
• Council generally agreed that staff should continue to discuss this policy direction, but
wanted a cautious approach.
■ Council felt that the type of strategies employed in the Climate Wise Program is appropriate.
■ Programs at the federal and state level may be more important, but there could be local
programs that are worth considering.
■ The language in the draft policy seems overly prescriptive and should be revised to reflect
the innovative, pragmatic approach to the issue.
ENV6-A: Reduce Carbon Intensity and Consumption
Question seeking Council direction: Should the Plan include a policy regarding reducing carbon
intensity and consumption?
■ There were mixed Council opinions as to whether this issue should be included as a policy.
• There were concerns about duplication of this item with the Climate Action Plan policies.
■ "There was recognition that this issue is closely related to other topic areas like transportation
and land use.
■ Most of the Council wanted the link between carbon impacts and land use planning to be
included in policy, but with refined language at a summary level with acknowledgment of the
linkages to other policy areas and the Climate Action Plan.
ENVS-A: Expand Opportunities for Stormwater Treatment and Conveyance
ENV9-A: Improve Stormwater Quality and Conveyance
ENV 10-A: Increase Stormwater Partnerships
Questions seeking Council direction: Should the Plan include a policy to allow"Green Streets"
as an option for Stormwater management? Should the Plan include policies to support regional
stormwater basins and partnerships to address stormwater quality and conveyance in areas where
traditional approaches are difficult to implement?
• Council expressed support for these policy statements.
■ Council asked how these policy statements related to the stormwater re-purposing discussion.
■ Several Council members reiterated their support for the green streets concept.
Fort Collins
LIV7-A: Identifv Neighborhoods Where Protective Measures are Needed
Question seeking Council direction: Should the Plan continue to include policies that promote
neighborhood conservation?
■ Council generally supported the policy direction.
• Council asked how the Eastside/Westside process fits into this policy statement.
• Council asked for a time table of neighborhood subarea plan updates and new areas for
possible neighborhood planning.
SW3-A: Support Healthy Living
Question seeking Council direction: Should the Plan support continued City coordination on and
education about opportunities for healthy living?
■ Council had mixed opinions on whether this policy statement should be included in City
Plan.
• Several Council members didn't think this direction was appropriate because the City has
limited influence over healthy living and the private sector and other organizations are
already leading this effort.
• Other Council members felt that this was an important topic that is influenced by City actions
Oil transportation, recreation. and air duality, and that the City should continue but not
expand existing efforts.
SW5-A: Support Local Agriculture and Food Production
Question seeking Council direction: Should the Plan support promoting local agriculture and
food production on City-owned properties?
• Council generally supported moving forward on this policy direction, but urged caution
about using public lands for agriculture.
■ Council felt this item would need more discussion about which public lands would be
appropriate for food production.
Next Steps:
The August 10 worksession will be continued on August 24 with the final policy discussion item,
LIV1O-A: Cary Forward Existing Policies Related to the Poudre River Corridor Activities and
Protections, and the policy choice "consent" ("to carry forward and refine") items.
Staff would particularly appreciate Council members letting the City Manager's Office
know prior to the August 24 work session which, if any, "consent" policies Council intends
to discuss. This will help staff plan for the appropriate resources being at the work session.
4
ATTACHMENT 3
City ®Cf.I dEvh�Ov'4 II!d mi Advance Planning
F6
281 North College Avenue
LLI 90821.63
Fort Collins,CO 80522
970.224.6111
970.224.6111 -fax
tcgov.con/advanceplanning
Memorandum
DATE: August 2, 2010
TO: Mayor Hutchinson and City Coun�cilmembers
THROUGH: Darin Atteberry, City Manager \ a
Diane Jones, Deputy City Manager
Karen Cumbo, Planning Development, and Transportation Director
FROM: Joe Frank, Advance Planning Director
Ken Waido, Chief Planner
Kathleen Bracke, Director of Transportation Planning and Special Projects
RE: Work Session Summary—July 27, 2010—Plan Fort Collins, Phase 2— Vision.
Policy Choices, and Proposed Directions
Work Session Participants:
Diane Jones, Deputy City Manager
Joe Frank, Advance Planning Department Director
Kathleen Bracke, Director of Transportation Planning and Special Projects
John Stokes, Natural Resources Director
Ben Hennan, Clarion Associates
Jeremy Klop, Fehr & Peers
Judy Dorsey, Brendle Group
Direction Sought/Ouestions to be Answered:
The Plan Fort Collins Project Management Team was seeking input and direction from tine City
Council on the policy choices and directions, in particular, focusing Council's input on those
policy choices where there is no clear cut consensus or agreement. The specific questions to be
addressed during the work session were:
1. Does Council have comments and/or direction on the list of Policy Choices Needing More
Discussion and Direction?
2. Does Council agree with the list of Policy Choices to Carly Forward and Rune?
3. Does Council have comments and/or direction on a definition of sustainability?
l
City of
Fort Collins
Council's Discussion/Direction:
The planning team asked the Council to address the following priority topics in order to
understand how to proceed with the balance of Phase 2 of Plan Fort Collins:
• Sustainability Definition
• Land Ready for Business (EH3-A and B)
• Stormwater Conveyance in Public Streets ("Green Streets") (ENV8-A)
• Poudre River Corridor Activities and Protections (LIV 10-A)
• Reshaping Existing Streets (TI-B)
• Vehicle Alternatives/Trails (TI-D)
• Transportation Investments to Achieve Goals (T2-A)
Sustainabilitv Definition
Question seeking Council direction: Does Council have comments and/or direction on the draft
definition of sustainability?
• There was no Council support to use the draft sustainability definition prepared by staff.
• The Brundtland Commission definition established in 1983, and a couple of other rather
simple definitions were identified as good examples that had support as a base definition.
• Staff was directed to focus on a simpler, higher level definition with supporting guidance
on an operating definition.
• There were mixed opinions as to whether the definition should be supported by a list of
indicators as an explanation of the Triple Bottom Line approach to sustainability.
TI-B: Reshape Existing Streets
The discussion on policy choice T1-B was next because the transportation planning consultants
would not be available on August 10 when the work session would continue.
Question seeking Council direction: Should the Plan support reshaping streets and context-
sensitive street standards to address multiple needs including stormwater, and "tailored" for
different areas of the community and levels of service for walking, bicycling, transit, and vehicle
capacity? This choice is related to the Stonnwater topic of"Green Streets".
■ There was general support for multiuse streets.
• Such an approach could be desirable especially in some key areas with low traffic
volumes and/or areas of high bicycle and pedestrian activity. (Example: Laurel Street
along CSU campus).
■ Location specific differences were noted so that there was the need to be context
sensitive.
City of
F6rt Collins
There was some concern about potential costs associated with construction and/or on-
going operations/maintenance.
T1-D: Vehicle Alternatives/Trails
Question seeking Council direction: Should the Plan support enhancing trails as part of the
transportation system, beyond their current recreational purpose, and how to address new vehicle '
types?
• There was general support for further exploration of this idea but there were also some
critical concerns such as:
o trails should not be wider through a natural areas.
o some trails are already too close to habitat areas in some locations.
• There might be some trail sections that can have dual or multiple use purposes for
commuting purposes such as the Power Trail and/or Mason Trail.
• Another important issue is what to do about non-traditional types of"motorized vehicles"
(electric bikes, etc).
■ Conduct research to provide examples of other communities with potential conflicts.
T2-A: Transportation Investments to Achieve Goals
Question seeking Council direction: Should the Plan explore new tools to achieve more reliable
long-tern funding sources for capital improvements and operations and maintenance for all
modes of transportation?.
• There were some Council concerns as to the appropriateness of this being in the Plan Fort
Collins process.
• There was no opposition to Plan Fort Collins exploring longer-tern finding sources.
• Council would like to see more information about how this topic relates to the long-teen
transportation plarming purpose of the Transportation Master Plan and the multimodal
Capital Improvement Plan, including the fiscally constrained plan.
Next Steps:
The July 27 work session will be continued on August 10.
3
ATTACHMENT 4
POLICY CHOICES TO CARRY FORWARD AND REFINE
Does Council agree with the following list of Policy Choices to Carry Forward and Refine?
Community Vision (pages 3-6)
Yes No Description Comments
Vision Refinement: Strengthen the
economic health vision directions and
clarify and refine terms within each of the
topic areas to reflect the proposed policy
directions.
Sustainability: Carrying forward the triple
bottom line concept and further refining it
and work on the triple bottom line
integrated model.
Economic Health (pages 11-22)
Yes No Description Comments
EHI-A: Primary Job Creation: Continue
emphasis on job creation. More discussion
is needed regarding specific implementation
strategies and role of the City.
EH4-A: Local Businesses: Encourage
local business, continuing the Shop Fort
Collins First program.
EH5-A: Workforce Training: Continue
coordination and partnerships with the
Larimer County Workforce Center and
other organizations for workforce training.
The City should not take a lead role in
assisting workforce training of the
unemployed.
Environmental Resources (pages 23-40)
Yes No Description Comments
ENV1-A, ENV2-A, ENV3-A: Energy
Policies: Reduce net energy use; modernize
the electric grid, and improve the energy
performance of existing buildings.
Continue to explore voluntary versus
mandatory measures (with comments
expressing more favor for voluntary
1
Yes No Description Comments
measures) and carefully consider up-front
costs versus long-term benefits.
ENV7-A: Waste Reduction: Continue
waste reduction and diversion efforts,
provided that they are generally voluntary
measures.
ENVII-A, ENV12-A, ENV13-A: Water
Policies: Address balanced water supply
planning and conservation, a resilient Cache
la Poudre River, and adapting to climate
change through the Water Demand and
Supply Policy Plan 2010 update.
ENV14-A: Open Lands: Continue
partnerships and strategic planning for
multi-purpose open lands that enhance and
restore streams, improve water quality,
provide and enhance trail corridors, enhance
wildlife and aquatic habitat, allow for
agriculture and water for food production,
provide parks and recreational purposes,
and achieve other aims. Refine the
terminology related to open lands.
Community and Neighborhood Livability (pages 41-60)
Yes No Description Comments
LIV 1-B, LIV1-C: Structure Plan:
Emphasize the activity centers and the
City's "spine" with strong connections
between activity centers and Mason/College
corridors.
LIV2-A: Allowable Building Heights:
Allow and encourage taller buildings in
activity centers and along the spine (with
the currently allow four to five stories
generally being an ideal height except for in
Downtown).
LIV3-A: Redevelopment and Intill
Strategies: Support redevelopment and
infill. Continue to explore the specific
implementation strategies proposed.
LIV4-A: City Gateways: Support City
gateways, but as a relatively lower priority
item due to concerns about potential costs.
Explore possible locations for priority
future gateways (possibly I-25 and
2
Yes No Description Comments
Harmony and I-25 and Mulberry) and
bracket potential elements of future
gateways.
LIV5-A: Neighborhood Transitions:
Refine neighborhood transition standards,
especially those related to transitions in
height and use, and spacing between new
and existing development.
LIVE-A: Mix of Housing Types: Provide
a mix of housing types to meet the needs of
a diverse population. Explore ways to
protect stable neighborhoods and to factor
in changing demographics.
LIV8-A: Affordable Housing: Maintain
existing affordable housing programs at
current levels.
LIV9-A: Alternative Landscape
Treatments: Modify landscaping standards
to allow and encourage "nature friendly"
alternatives to turf grass and other water-
intensive landscaping; hard surfaced swales,
etc.
Safety and Wellness (pages 61-67)
Yes No Description Comments
SW1-B: Community Safety: Maintain
current levels of service for community
safety. Note: Provide more information
about current levels of safety and
emergency response times.
SW2-A: Active Lifestyles: Continue to
provide and expand opportunities for
residents to lead active lifestyles.
SW4-A: Health and Human Services
Access: Improve access to health and
human service providers. Emphasize
regional coordination and access to
traditional and alternative health care
providers.
SW5-A: Support Local Agriculture and
Food Production.
3
Culture, Parks, and Recreation (pages 69-75)
Yes No Description Comments
CPR1-A: Arts and Culture Promotion:
Promote and continue to integrate arts and
culture. Explore formation of an arts
council.
CPR3-A: Parks Adaptation: Promote
new and different types of parks and multi-
purpose parks and open space areas.
Continue discussions about types of parks
and multi-use spaces desired, including
possible pocket parks and a kayak park.
CPR4-A: Recreation Enhancements:
Coordinate to enhance recreational
programming and pursue multi-purpose
facilities in the future.
High Performing Community
Yes No Description Comments
HI1-A: Collaborative Problem Solving:
Involve citizens and forge partnerships at a
local and regional level. Explore
opportunities for collaboration nationally
and globally.
HI2-A: Effective Local Governance_:
Continue to provide effective,
representative government. Explore new
ideas about City Council representation
(e.g., at-large members) and underscore the
need to include a range of voices.
HI3-A, Communications and Technology:
Support robust community interaction and
explore expansion of communications
technology as basic infrastructure. Explore
impacts on current technology service
providers.
4