Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 04/06/2010 - SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 029, 2010, AMENDIN DATE: April 6, 2010 STAFF: Steve Dush AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Mike Gebo T COLLINS CITY COUNCIL ID I SUBJECT Second Reading of Ordinance No. 029, 2010, Amending Sections 7.5-24 and 7.5-25 of the City Code Regarding the Refunding of Capital Improvement Expansion Fees for Abandoned Development Projects. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There is no Code section that speaks to the refunding of collected Capital Improvement Expansion Fees(CIEFs)to an owner/developer who has requested a refund due to the abandonment of the project. The Code only provides that CIEFs may be refunded if they are not appropriated within seven years or expended within ten years from the date collected. This Ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on March 16, 2010, establishes that CIEFs can be refunded to the owner of the property for which the fees were paid, in the event of project and permit abandonment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading. ATTACHMENTS 1. Copy of First Reading Agenda Item Summary- March 16, 2010 (w/o attachments) ATTACHMENT 1 DATE: March 16, 2010 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY STAFF: Steve Dush, Mike Gebo FORT COLLINSCOUNCIL First Reading of Ordinance No. 029, 2010, Amending Sections 7.5-24 and 7.5-25 of the City Code Regarding the Refunding of Capital Improvement Expansion Fees for Abandoned Development Projects. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Municipal Code Section 7.5 Article II imposes certain fees,tit red•Cap cap ital Improvement Expansion Fees(CIEF)for the purpose of funding the provisions of additional ital improvements as the.City's population increases. The imposition of CIEFs ensures that new growth and development-in the/City bear Wf roportionate share of the costs of capital expenditures necessary to provide community park, library, police, fire and general government and transportation capital improvements. There is no Code section that speaks to the refunding of collected CIEFs to an owner/developer who has requested a refund due to the abandonment of the project and permit. The Code only provides that CIEFs may be refunded if they are not appropriated within seven years or expended within ten years from the date collected. This Ordinance establishes that CIEFs can be refunded to the owner of the property for which the fees were paid, in the event of project and permit abandonment. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION v CIEFs are based on the: • City's Capital Improvement Expansion Cost Study, dated May 21, 1996 • City's Street Oversizing Impact Fee Study, dated July 15, 1997 • Street Oversizing Impact Fee Study Update, dated November 28, 2000 • The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, 1997, published by the Institute of Traffic Engineers. In general the Code establishes that: 1. Funds collected from said fees shall not exceed the cost of providing the capital improvements for which they are imposed, and the fees shall be expended solely to provide the specified capital improvements. 2. An fees not so a ro riated:witfiid seven ears or ex ended b 'th'e City for purposes approved within ten Y PP P „ �, �/ Y t.� p Y Y P p PP years of the date of payment, shall be refunded. ' \ Problem Statement � U-' (i1 There is no Code section that speaks to the refunding of collected CIEFs to an owner/developer who has requested a refund due to the abandonment of the project. The Code only provides that CIEFs may be refunded if they are not appropriated within seven years or expended within ten years from the date collected. Proposed Code Change This proposed Code change establishes that CIEFs can be refunded to the owner of the property for which the fees were paid, in the event of project and permit abandonment. �1 -V-T TT Prior to refunding of CIEFs fora projectabandonment,th&proposed code changes would specify that the construction site shall meet certain standards such,`1as: • Construction hazards removed • Foundation is capped and secured • Partial structures are boarded and secured March 16, 2010 -2- ' ITEM 16 • Dirt stockpiles have been removed and the site re-leveled • All exposed soils are to be re-seeded to prevent wind erosion • The property is adequately fenced meeting the standards contained in Division 3.8 of the Land Use Code to provide for public safety and site security • All public infrastructures which have been damaged by reason of the site development activities are to be fully repaired, inspected and accepted by the City. Staff has identified that City Code Sections 7.5-24 and 7.5-25 provide a narrow interpretation as to when refunds can be granted. This proposed Code change establishes that an owner/developer can request a refund of CIEFs in the event that their permitted project has expired and is abandoned. ` 7 Prior to refunding of the CIEFs the construction site shalli'meet certain conditions designed to assure the health and safety of the public while limiting on-goin�o�ninte` n cost to the City: aL FINANCIAL IMPACT Currently, the financial impacts to the City related to any stalled construction project include on-going staff review of the site, sending notices and follow-up with the owners as conditions that need correcting arise. Conditions that typically require the owner's attention are security of the building by boarding up or replacing damaged windows and doors, site clean-up of leftover construction debris and weed control efforts. These costs are minimal and can be absorbed into the current Community Development and Neighborhood Services budget. The proposed Code change establishesithat,prior,to receiving a CIEF refundthe owner/developer would have certain financial obligations to assure that the(constructi,I site is left in a c`ondition`which provides for the safety of the public. Additionally, the site condition requirements are intended>to limit the Cityls cost of repairs and monitoring measures. Essentially, the site is placed in a "mothballed condition which-could exist-for an extended period of time. SUSTAINABILITY: ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS Economic Impacts i The proposed Code change requires owners of stalled construction projects, who have requested CIEF refunds, to provide basic site improvement such as seeding disturbed soils and installing security fencing.Additionally, any City infrastructure which was damaged due�to the constfuction�perfojmed"thuy�far would be required to be repaired, inspected and approved by the City:�engineer!�j�The cost 111 uo provide�?sye security and soil seeding as well as infrastructure repairs would be borne by the project and'be in place prior to the City refunding of any CIEF's. Environmental Impacts / An early step in any construction project involves earth works,the removing of top vegetation and stock piling of soils for future use. During active construction the soil erosion can be limited by dampening and vehicle traffic. Stock piles and exposed soils at abandoned construction sites tend to dry out excessively, giving rise to wind-borne erosion with dust blowing off-site. Depending on the wind event,the dust levels can be significant and wide spread throughout the surrounding area. The proposed changes would require that the owner level the site, removing all stock piles of soil and properly seed all exposed soils prior to receiving refunds of CIEF's. nSocial Impacts The economy in general and the management/of a constuction.project will.determine successor failure of the project. Failed and abandoned construction projects are a reality and often times are left in a state of disrepair which can become an eyesore to the neighbors and blight to the surrounding neighborhoods. March 16, 2010 -3- ITEM 16 Abandoned buildings and structures half completed without security measures installed can become an attractive nuisance to children. Buildings left unattended can deteriorate and become"dangerous"if the structure degrades due to uninstalled exterior surfaces and weather protective coatings. The proposed changes require that the owner install a substantial security fence around the site to prevent unlawful entry by children or others. Although this change does not address exterior surfaces of partially completed buildings, should the structure degrade to a point that it becomes"dangerous",these issues can be addressed through the 2006 International Property Maintenance Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION t Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance n First Ica g {P ;t COPY COPY 5{ COPY ORDINANCE NO. 029, 2010 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AMENDING SECTIONS 7.5-24 AND 7.5-25 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS REGARDING THE REFUNDING OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPANSION FEES FOR ABANDONED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WHEREAS, Section 7.5-24 of the City Code contains certain provisions entitling persons to refunds of capital improvement expansion fees if the funds collected pursuant to the fees have not been appropriated for expenditure within seven years of the date of payment of such fees and expended within ten years of the date of such payment; and WHEREAS, Chapter 7.5 contains no provision for the refunding of capital improvement expansion fees for abandoned development projects; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2.10(B) of the Land Use Code contains provisions allowing for the abandonment of development projects but does not contain any provision for the refunding of capital improvement expansion fees upon abandonment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interests of the City that a procedure be established whereby capital improvement expansion fees can be refunded for abandoned development projects as long any such refunds are conditioned upon the applicant having first ensured that the physical condition of the development site does not endanger the public health, safety and welfare of the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That Section 7.5-24 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: See. 7.5-24. Entitlement to refunds for non ap prop riation/non expenditure. (a) All fees collected pursuant to this Article shall be appropriated by the City Council for expenditure within seven(7)years from the date of payment of such fees and shall be expended by the City for purposes approved herein within ten(10)years of the date of payment.Any fees not so appropriated or expended shall be refunded, upon application, to the record owner of the property for which the impact fee was paid or, if the impact fee was paid by another governmental entity, to such governmental entity, together with interest calculated from the date of collection to the date of refund;provided,however,that the City shall retain an additional two(2) percent of the fee to offset the cost of refund. (b) In determining whether fee revenues have been appropriated or expended within the requisite periods of time specified in subparagraph (a), monies in the applicable capital improvement expansion fee accounts shall be considered to be appropriated and expended on a first in,first out basis;that is,the first fees paid shall be considered the first fees appropriated and expended. (c) Any application for a refund under the provisions of this Section shall be made within one hundred eighty (180) days of the expiration of the ten-year period following the date of payment of such fee, according to the procedures described in §§ 7.5-23 and 7.5-25. If a refund is due hereunder, the amount of such refund shall be divided proportionately among all applicants for refunds who have filed applications during said one-hundred-eighty-day period; provided,however, that in no event shall the amount of any refund exceed the amount of the fee paid on behalf of the property for which the refund is sought, plus interest at the rate of five (5) percent per annum. Section 2. That Article II, Division 1 of the Section 7.5 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended by the addition of a new Section 7.5-24.1 which reads in its entirety as follows: Sec. 7.5-24.1 Entitlement to refund upon abandonment. Fees collected pursuant to this Article may be refunded to the current owner of the real property for which the fee was paid in the event that the right to develop the property in accordance with the approved plan has been abandoned as provided in Section 2.2.10(B) of the Land Use Code. Any such refund shall be processed in accordance with the procedures described in § 7.5-25. No such refund based upon abandonment shall be made until the following conditions have been met: (1) the property which is the subject of the refund has been restored in such manner that all stockpiles of fill material have been leveled,all exposed soil is seeded with grass or other ground cover, which cover has been adequately established to prevent wind and soil erosion; (2) the property is adequately fenced in accordance with the standards contained in Division 3.8 of the Land Use Code in such manner as to adequately protect, in the judgment of the City Manager, public safety; (3) all equipment and other construction hazards have been removed; (4) any open foundations have been capped and open structures have been boarded and secured; (5) any damage that has been caused to public infrastructure by reason of the development activities upon the property have been fully repaired; and (6) such restoration measures have been inspected and approved by the City. -2- Section 3. That Section 7.5-25 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 7.5-25. Procedure to obtain refund. (a) All applications for refund under this Article shall be submitted to the Financial Officer. Each application shall be in a form established by the Financial Officer, and shall contain the following: (1) A copy of the dated receipt issued for payment of the fee; (2) A notarized, sworn statement that the applicant is the current owner of the real property for which the fee was paid and a certified copy of the current deed to such property. (3) For refunds based upon abandonment, a copy of the approval of abandonment in accordance with Section 2.2.10(B)of the Land Use Code. (b) The Financial Officer shall determine if the application for a refund is sufficient on its face within five(5)working days.If the Financial Officer determines that the application is not sufficient, a written notice shall be mailed to the applicant within said period of time specifying the deficiencies. No further action shall be taken on the application until the deficiencies are remedied. Any such deficiencies must be remedied within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing of the notice from the Financial Officer, or prior to the expiration of the period of time for filing an application for a refund under Subsection 7.5-24(c), whichever is later. If the application is determined sufficient,the Financial Officer shall notify the applicant, in writing,of the application's sufficiency and that the application is ready for review pursuant to the procedures and standards of this Section. (c) With respect to refunds based upon nonappropriation/expenditure, within ten (10) working days after the application is determined sufficient, the Financial Officer shall determine whether the City has appropriated and expended the fee(s) paid by the feepayer within the periods of time required under Subsection 7.5-24(a). If so, the application for refund shall be denied. If not, the applicant shall be entitled to a refund, except that the City shall retain an additional two (2) percent of the impact fee to offset the costs of administering the refund. (d) With respect to refunds based upon abandonment,within ten(10)working days after the application is determined sufficient and site restoration has been completed as required pursuant to § 7.5-24.1, the applicant shall be entitled to a refund, except that the City shall retain an additional two (2) percent of the impact fee to offset the costs of administering the refund. -3- (d) The decision of the Financial Officer with regard to any refund may be appealed to the City Manager under the provisions of Subsection 7.5-23(b) and Article VI of Chapter 2 of this Code. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 16th day of March, A.D. 2010, and to be presented for final passage on the 6 f y of April, A.D. 2010. ✓ 1 Mayor ATTEST: - G-'�tL City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 6th day of April, A.D. 2010. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk -4-