HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 09/19/2006 - SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 131, 2006, AMENDIN ITEM NUMBER: 10
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY DATE: September 19, 2006
FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL STAFF: Pete Wray
SUBJECT
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 131,2006,Amending the Land Use Code Article 4 to Add a New
Rural Lands Zone District,as Division 4.1 and Rearrange Division Numbering and to Revise Article
3 Section 3.9.2 to Allow Single Family Residential in the RUL District Within One-Quarter Mile
of Interstate Highway 25.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ordinance No. 131,2006,unanimously adopted on September 5,2006,amends the Land Use Code,
Article 4,to add anew Rural Lands Zone District,Division 4.1. All proceeding Divisions will then
be rearranged. This action represents a housekeeping item to rearrange the numbering of the Article
4 Districts in the Land Use Code,based on the inclusion of the new RUL District placed in the front
as Division 4.1. The adjustment to the numbering of all other Divisions includes 4.1 —4.28. As part
of this amendment, three new Divisions are added as future placeholders, reserved for future use.
This Ordinance also amends the Land Use Code, Article 3 — General Development Standards to
allow single-family lots within 1/4 mile of I-25, which would exempt the RUL zone from the
residential restriction.
ITEM NUMBER: 12 A-C
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY DATE: September 5, 2006
FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL STAFF: Pete Wray
SUBJECT ri T)IL
Items Relating to the Creation of a New Rural Lands Zone District (RUL) in the Land Use Code.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the Resolutions and Ordinance on First Reading. At the August 17th,
2006 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing, members voted 7-0 to recommend to City Council the
approval of the new Rural Lands Zoning and related amendments.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A. Resolution 2006-091 A SVaew
"Land Use Designations" for
a Parcel of Property L ated o hwes a of Interstate Highway 25 and
County Road 36 Base n Relat Acti s reRural Lands Zone District.
B. Resolution 2006-092 Amending the Fossil Creek Reservoir Area Plan Framework Map,
Land Use Table and County Zoning Map Based on Related Actions to Create a New Rural
Lands Zone District.
C. First Reading of Ordinance No. 131, 2006,Amending the Land Use Code Article 4 to Add
a New Rural Lands Zone District, as Division 4.1 and Re-Arrange Division Numbering and
to Revise Article 3 Section 3.9.2 to Allow Single Family Residential in the RUL District
Within One-Quarter Mile of Interstate Highway 25.
The City's Land Use Code lacks a Zone District to properly implement City Plan policies for areas
designated as"Rural Lands"and"Community Separator"on the City Structure Plan. The proposed
RUL District is designed to fill that void. It is modeled very closely upon the County FA-1 and FA
Farming zone districts,along with two other existing Latimer County Zoning Districts,Airport and
Rural Estate. The RUL District OCCit
nsity single-family residential
development, residual open 1 s, and
result of creating a new RUL
District, several amendments needehe Land Use Code.
Staff is recommending an amendment to the Fossil Creek Reservoir Area Plan and City Structure
Plan maps. This amendment involves a change to the land use designation on a property outside the
city limits located on the southwest corner of County Road 36 and I-25. This property was zoned
Commercial in the County in 1995, but has been designated RUL on the City Structure Plan and
Fossil Creek Reservoir Area Plan. The amendment includes changing the designation from Rural
Lands to Commercial to be consistent with Larimer County zoning. Based on this change, two
September 5, 2006 -2- Item No. 12 A-C
sections in the Fossil Creek Reservoir Area Plan need to reflect the added commercial designation
including Land Use Table 2.1 and Existing County Zoning Map.
Staff is recommending an amen to A ' e 4, to add a new Rural Lands
Zone District, Division 4.1. 11 pr c ding i io w en be re-arranged. This action
represents a housekeeping ite rearr a the enng oft Article 4 Districts in the Land Use
Code based on the inclusion o ew . t plac in the front as Division 4.1. The
adjustment to the numbering of all other Divisions includes 4.1 —4.28. As part of this amendment,
three new Divisions are added as future placeholders, reserved for future use.
Lastly,an amendment is needed to the Land Use Code,Article 3—General Development Standards
to allow single-family lots within 1/4 mile of I-25, which would exempt the RUL zone from the
residential restriction.
BACKGROUND
AMENDMENTS
1. Amendment to the City u ture an Ma
A
In early 2006 it was brought to aff s at tion cusyCet
about the proposed RUL zoning
that the adopted City Struc 1 a th Fossil Reservoir Area Plan land use
designation showing Rural Lands is inconsistent with existing County zoning of Commercial for a
specific property southwest of 1-25 and County Road 36. The property is outside municipal
boundaries,but inside the Fort Collins Growth Management Area. The existing use is RV and Boat
sales and storage. The County approved this zoning in 1995 with certain conditions to only allow
this type of use.
Staff, in working with the affected property owner, is prepared to acknowledge this error and
recommend an amendment to the City Structure Plan and Fossil Creek Reservoir Area Plan maps
to change the land use designation from Rural Lands to Commercial.
If this property ever annexes into the City, staff will exercise the same conditions placed in the
property by the County to limit the uses to the existing business operations.
2. Amendments to the Foss' seek ery ' re a
As a follow-up to the Comm cial 1 use si on c ge mentioned above to the City
Structure Plan map,the Fossil ek 8 oir a Ian also eds to be amended for this specific
parcel. The Fossil Creek Reservoir Area Plan describes this area to be consistent with County
zoning of FA-1 Fanning. The Fossil Creek reservoir Area Plan,jointly adopted by the City and
County in 1998, continues to describe this property as"Rural Lands". This particular property was
not recognized for this zoning change in the County, and as a result was not designated commercial
in the Fossil Creek Reservoir Area Plan. Two sections of the Plan need to be revised to reflect the
added commercial designation including Land Use Table 2.1,and the Existing County Zoning Map.
September 5, 2006 -3- Item No. 12 A-C
3. New Rural Lands District (RUL)
The basis of the RUL District standards lies within the County's existing zoning regulations
including FA-1 and FA Fannin rt u t The City Structure Plan map
shows three main areas for the L d s' atio th so e a in and around the Fossil Creek
Reservoir, the southwest qua t (So west n ave Area and in the northwest edge of the
GMA. The total amount of rur s d ion 'thin th A is 1,511 acres.
In City Plan the intent of this designation is summarized:
"Rural lands consist of agricultural and residential lands that form our community's
edge. Key rural lands will be protected as community separators. Other areas may
have land uses such as clustered residential development, large lot residential and
agriculture."
The proposed RUL District would restrict residential development to large lots (10 acre minimum
lot size) or residential clusters (gross density 2.3 acres/unit to be clustered on a portion of the
property with a requirement that 80%of the property remain as open space), except in the Resource
Management Area where clusters can have a gross density of one dwelling unit per 2 acres).
Subsection 4.2(13)(3)(a)(1)of the RUL District requires such Residential Cluster Developments,to
the maximum extent feasible, JL
dQJ?en
t enterline of
Other permitted uses in the RUt sp edge tothe community,including
golf courses, cemeteries, and aapub ' purchased/conserved open space
and natural areas.
No new residential is allowed within the designated Airport Critical Area of the Fort
Collins/Loveland Airport.
4. Amendment to the Land Use Code Article 4 Districts
The last Division to be added to the Land Use Code Article 4 was the High Density Mixed-Use
Neighborhood District (HMN). This Division was placed at the end of the list of Divisions at the
time. Now,with the inclusion of another residential district,an opportunity exists to re-arrange the
list to group all residential Districts together, from low density to high density classifications. This
action represents a housekeeping item to rearrange the numbering of the Article 4 Districts in the
Land Use Code based on the inclusion of the new RUL District placed in the front as Division 4.1.
The adjustment to the numbe ' all s ' lu 4.1 — 4.28. As part of this
amendment, three new Divisi are d d as p eh s, reserved for future use. Aside
from the re-arranging of each strict, only e will b o the tooter notation numbering.
5. Revision to Section 3.9.2 of the Land Use Code to Allow Single-Family Detached
Dwellings in the RUL District to be Developed within 1/4 mile of the I-25 centerline
The Fossil Creek Reservoir Area Plan, City Plan, and the Structure Plan designate a certain area
along the west side of I-25,north of the reservoir,as"Rural Lands"and these areas would be placed
in the RUL District upon annexation into the City. Three land parcels in this area are entirely within
one-quarter mile of I-25. The Land Use Code prohibits the development of new single-family lots
September 5, 2006 -4- Item No. 12 A-C
within 1/4 mile of I-25's centerline, as a result of the regional 1-25 Corridor Plan. (The standard is
found in Section 3.9 of the Code, which consists of development standards for the I-25 Corridor.)
Because residential use is theaany in proposed RUL zone district,
there has been concern that th iv or is such as the three noted above,
which would be prevented fro e a devel ment. In response to the concern,
this item includes proposed lan ards in ion 3.92 which would exempt the
RUL zone from the residential restriction. For any parcels which have room to cluster residential
development outside of the 1/4 mile area,the RUL Zone District includes a standard to require such
placement.
As noted above,a prohibition on residential development within 1/4 mile of I-25 has raised concerns
about properties in this area that would be placed in the RUL zone. Because the RUL zone allows
few land uses, the prohibition on residential may be an excessive limitation.
Staff s recommendation is si
mply 1 to exempt the RUL Zone District from the prohibition. The three
PY P
parcels which raised the issue, north of Fossil Creek Reservoir on the west side of I-25, total about
80 acres. The cluster development density of 2.29 acres per unit could theoretically result in as
many as 35 units within this area. The City would have influence in locating the clusters away from
I-25 through the development review process. The cluster development density, which matches
current County FA-1 zoning, eco
co ' tPtheek Reservoir Area Plan. Staff
believes the RUL District and devel be consistent with City Plan
goals to have a rural edge to ity, without undue visual
impacts on 1-25, or a need for l of
PUBLIC PROCESS
On May 4, 2004, the City Plan Update was adopted by City Council. This update included a new
land use designation in the Structure Plan Map called "Rural Lands". At the time, no zoning
matched this land use designation, so staff was instructed to follow-up this action to create a new
District.
At its June 17, 2004 meeting,the Planning and Zoning Board tabled a recommendation to the City
Council on the RUL District when it was discovered there was a conflict between the low-density
residential land use provisions and Section 3.9.2 of the Land Use Code which would prevent any
residential development on certain properties. Three parcels in this area are entirely within the 1/4
mile distance, and the Board was concerned about an unfair reduction of development potential by
preventing any further residenCgand
to on r' ithin the 1/4 mile distance.
On August 19,2004,the PlaneZ ing orwarde a recommendation to City Counclto support the RUL,with new 1in 3 allowi ngle-family residential within the
1/4 mile distance in the RUL District. Since this Hearing, staff has continued to work with affected
property owners.
As a result of an extended time period, on October 20, 2005, the Planning and Zoning Board again
forwarded a recommendation to City Council to support the RUL zoning. Several attempts by staff
have been made to schedule a hearing with Council, however, certain property owners and their
representatives have expressed a desire to continue meeting with staff to resolve outstanding issues.
September 5, 2006 -5- Item No. 12 A-C
Several individual property owner meetings with staff have taken place,including three public open
house meetings throughout the planning process.
In particular, remaining develo arc thi o ' C k Reservoir area are shown as
RUL designation, within the U are d exi 'n C t zoning. Staff has continued to
work with the owners in this ar to clan rop d i zonin language consistency with existing
County zoning standards. Sta ade a p ents a text to assure the standards are
consistent. In addition, staff has clarified to affected owners that this new RUL zoning will not
preclude entitlement through a County development review process prior to annexation in
accordance with the County's existing land use requirements (i.e., this action is not intended to
change the County's current land use provisions). Furthermore, for properties within the Fossil
Creek Reservoir Area TDU receiving area,the City has an agreement with Larimer County to defer
annexation until such time as a development has received final approval and completion of the TDU
transfer in the County. Finally, a question arose about the City zoning designation for properties
which may have received County approval of a residential cluster in the Resource Management Area
prior to annexation. The staff clarified that they will analyze and determine at the time of
annexation what the exact zoning lines should be and that either RUL or UE zoning may be
appropriate for the RMA cluster depending upon the density and lot sizes within the cluster and any
other relevant factors.
As a result of extended time rendatil
e ' d cent revisions to the proposed
zoning text, staff determinep opria t re e e hearing with the Planning and
Zoning Board for a new reco on A th.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location map showing areas designated as Rural Lands.
2. Letters from John Jensen dated March 6 and April 20, 2006.
3. Enlargement map showing commercial parcel
4. Enlargement map showing three parcels in the RUL designation that are within 1/4 mile of
I-25.
5. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes from the August 17, 2006 Hearing.
6. Letter from Liley, Rogers & Martell LLC dated August 17, 2006.
C 0
P
ORDINANCE NO.131, 2006
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE ARTICLE 4 TO ADD A NEW
RURAL LANDS ZONE DISTRICT, AS DIVISION 4.1 AND REARRANGE
DIVISION NUMBERING AND TO REVISE ARTICLE 3 SECTION 3.9.2 TO ALLOW
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN THE RUL DISTRICT WITHIN
ONE-QUARTER MILE OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 25
WHEREAS, on March 18, 1997, by Ordinance No. 051, 1997, the Council of the City of
Fort Collins adopted the Fort Collins Land Use Code(the "Land Use Code"); and
WHEREAS, at the time of the adoption of the Land Use Code, it was the understanding
of staff and Council that the Land Use Code would most likely be subject to future amendments,
not only for the purpose of clarification and correction of errors, but also for the purpose of
ensuring that the Land Use Code remains a dynamic document capable of responding to issues
identified by staff, other land use professionals and citizens of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Land Use Code lacks a zone district designation sufficient to properly
implement the policies of City Plan for areas designated as "rural lands" and "community
separators" on the City's Structure Plan Map; and
WHEREAS, the Council has determined that the proposed Rural Lands District (R-U-L)
is in the best interest of the citizens of the City because it fills that void in the City's land use
regulations by establishing a zone district which permits large lot and/or residential cluster
development and other uses that are sensitive to and in keeping with a rural and open space edge
to the community, including golf courses, cemeteries and agricultural uses as well as
open space
P
and natural areas;
WHEREAS, the staff of the City and the Planning and Zoning Board have reviewed the
Land Use Code and identified and explored various issues related to the proposed new Rural
Land Zone District and have made recommendations to the Council regarding such issues; and
WHEREAS, the Council has determined that the Land Use Code amendments which
have been proposed are in the best interest of the City and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FORT COLLINS as follows:
Section 1. That Section 3.9.2 of the Land Use Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
3.9.2 Location of Single-Family Residential Lots From I-25
(A) Development of new single-family residential lots within one thousand three
hundred twenty (1,320) feet (one-quarter ['/1 mile) of the centerline of Interstate
Highway 25 (I-25) shall be prohibited.
(1) Exception: single-family detached dwellings in the Rural Lands District
(RUL) shall be exempt from this standard.
(B) In the Urban Estate zone district, development that creates new single-family
residential lots located between one-quarter ('/4) and one-half('/2) mile from the
centerline of I-25 shall utilize the clustering technique (as provided for in Section
4.1(E)(2) of this Land Use Code for the Urban Estate District) in order to
concentrate densities away from I-25, maximize views and preserve landscape
features or open space.
Section 2. That the Land Use Code is hereby amended by the addition of a new
Division 4.1 which reads in its entirety as follows:
Division 4.1 Rural Lands District (RUL)
(A) Purpose. The Rural Lands District is intended for privately owned lands that are
planned as a rural edge to the community. Rural lands include but are not limited
to community separators, clustered residential development, large lot residential,
agriculture, natural area buffers and corridors, and other open lands of similar
character and purpose.
(B) Permitted Uses.
(1) The following uses are permitted in the R-U-L District, subject to Basic
Development review, provided that such uses are located on lots that are
part of an approved site-specific development plan:
(a) Agricultural Uses:
1. Agricultural activities.
(b) Accessory/Miscellaneous Uses:
1. Accessory buildings.
2. Accessory uses.
3. Farm animals.
(c) Any use authorized pursuant to a site specific development plan
that was processed and approved either in compliance with the
Zoning Code in effect on March 27, 1997, or in compliance with
this Land Use Code (other than a final subdivision plat, or minor
subdivision plat, approved pursuant to Section 29-643 or 29-644 of
prior law, for any nonresidential development or any multi-family
dwelling containing more than four [4] dwelling units), provided
that such use shall be subject to all of the use and density
requirements and conditions of said site specific development plan.
(d) Any use which is not hereafter listed as a permitted use in this zone
district but which was permitted for a specific parcel of property
pursuant to the zone district regulations in effect for such parcel on
March 27, 1997; and which physically existed upon such parcel on
March 27, 1997; provided, however, that such existing use shall
constitute a permitted use only on such parcel of property.
(2) The following uses are permitted in the R-U-L District subject to
administrative review:
a Residential Uses:
1. Single-family detached dwellings on lots containing at least
ten(10) acres.
(b) Institutional/Public/Civic Uses:
1. Public facilities.
2. Parks, recreation and open lands, except neighborhood
parks as defined by the Parks and Recreation Policy Plan.
(c) Industrial Uses:
1. Composting facilities.
(d) Agricultural Uses:
1. Animal boarding.
(3) The following land uses are permitted in the R-U-L District subject to
review by the Planning and Zoning Board:
(a) Residential Uses:
1. Single-family detached dwellings in Residential Cluster
Developments, except that such Residential Cluster
Developments shall, to the maximum extent feasible, be
located at least one-thousand three hundred twenty (1,320)
feet (one-quarter [1/4] mile) from the centerline of
Interstate Highway 25 (I-25).
2. Group homes.
(b) Institutional/Civic/Public Uses:
1. Golf Courses.
2. Riding Academies.
3. Cemeteries.
(c) Industrial Uses:
1. Resource extraction processes and sales, except that such
uses shall not be permitted in natural area protection
buffers.
(d) Accessory Uses:
1. Wireless Telecommunication Equipment provided that they
are not located within one thousand three hundred twenty
(1,320) feet (one-quarter [1/4] mile) of the centerline of
either I-25 or Carpenter Road.
(C) Prohibited Uses. All uses that are not (1) expressly allowed as permitted uses in
this Section or (2) determined to be permitted by the Director pursuant to Section
1.3.4 of this Land Use Code shall be prohibited.
(D) Land Use Standards.
(1) Residential Density.
(a) Single-Family Detached maximum residential density shall be one
(1) dwelling unit per ten (10) acres.
(b) Residential Cluster Development density shall be based on one (1)
dwelling unit per one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet
measured on the entire site.
(c) Resource Management Area, density of residential cluster
development shall be calculated as follows: The total acres of
subject parcel, less any area that is within a one hundred (100) year
floodway or covered by a body of water, multiplied by 0.5,
equivalent to one (1) dwelling unit per two (2) acres.
(2) Airport Critical Area — No Residential Use. No residential use shall be
permitted within the designated Airport Critical Area.
(3) Dimensional Standards.
(a) A setback area of at least eighty (80) feet shall be provided along
arterial streets, measured from the right-of-way.
(b) Single-family detached dwellings on lots containing at least ten
(10) acres:
1. Minimum lot width shall be two hundred (200) feet.
2. Minimum depth of the front yard shall be sixty(60) feet.
3. Minimum depth of the rear yard shall be fifty(50) feet.
4. Minimum side yard shall be fifty(50) feet.
(c) Single-family detached dwellings in Residential Cluster
Developments:
1. Minimum lot width shall be sixty(60) feet.
2. Minimum depth of the rear yard shall be fifteen(15) feet.
(d) Maximum building height for single-family detached dwellings
shall be three(3) stories.
(E) Development Standards.
(1) Street Connectivity and Design. The following standards shall apply to all
development in the Rural Lands District:
(a) Development in this District shall be exempt from the standards
contained in Section 3.6.3, Street Pattern and Connectivity
Standards.
(b) The layout and design of any new streets shall emphasize
characteristics and views of the open landscape. To the maximum
extent feasible, streets shall be designed to minimize the amount of
site disturbance caused by roadway and associated grading
required for their construction by utilizing special street design
characteristics such as divided lanes, landscape islands and
landscape solutions to drainage instead of standard curb and gutter
(so that storm water runoff is directed into open swales and
ditches). Local and residential access roads shall be designed
without curbs and gutters unless deemed necessary for health and
safety by the City Engineer.
(2) Residential Development Configuration. Residential development may be
configured as lots containing at least ten (10) acres, or as a Residential
Cluster Development, at the option of the applicant, except in the Fossil
Creek Reservoir Resource Management Area where clustering shall be
required.
(3) Site Design for Residential Cluster Development. Property in the Rural
Lands District may be developed in clusters, subject to approval by the
Planning and Zoning Board. In a cluster development, lot sizes may be
reduced in order to cluster the dwellings together on twenty (20) percent
of the property, with the remainder of the property permanently preserved
as private open space.
(a) At least eighty (80) percent of the residual gross land area of the
proposed development shall remain under private ownership, as
private open space protected by restrictive covenants for the
benefit of the city, and/orb maintaining existing dwellings and
Y Y g g g
any outbuildings, protected by restrictive covenants binding upon
either: (1) existing residential owners; (2) the residential
homeowners association if it owns such property; or(3) a nonprofit
organization acceptable to the city, if it owns such property. The
development plan shall include such restrictive provisions
protected by restrictive covenants for the benefit of the city,
proposed uses, and maintenance provisions as necessary to ensure
the continuation of the private open space uses intended. The city
may also require that the developer commit in the Development
Agreement to maintain the open space.
(b) Only the uses specifically permitted in subsection (B) above shall
be allowed in the cluster development. For the residual open land,
existing dwellings and/or outbuildings relating to agricultural use
are allowed to remain and, if included, may be applied toward the
total allowed residential density in the development.
(c) The design of the cluster development shall be appropriate for the
site, as demonstrated by meeting the following criteria:
1. The preservation of significant natural resources, wildlife
habitat, natural areas and features such as drainage swales,
rock outcroppings and slopes, native vegetation, open lands
or agricultural property through maintenance of large,
contiguous blocks of land and other techniques. Residual
land shall be designed to achieve the maximum amount of
contiguous open space possible, while avoiding the creation
of small, isolated and unusable areas.
2. The provision of additional amenities such as trails,
common areas or access to public recreational areas and
open space. Residual lands shall not include any street
rights-of-way or parking areas.
3. The protection of adjacent residential development through
landscaping, screening, fencing, buffering or similar
measures.
4. The layout of lots to conform to terrain and minimize
grading and filling, including the preservation of natural
features such as drainage swales, rock outcroppings and
slopes.
5. The indication of any areas where farm animals will be
allowed, including any mitigation features needed to buffer
these areas from surrounding uses.
Section 3. That the existing Divisions 4.1 through 4.8 in the Land Use Code are now
renumbered as Division 4.2 through Division 4.9.
Section 4. That Division 4.24 - High Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood District (
H-
M-N) of the Land Use Code is now Division 4.10.
Section 5. That the remaining Divisions in the Land Use Code are hereby
renumbered as follows:
Division 4.11 Reserved
Division 4.12 Transition District (T)
Division 4.13 Public Open Lands District (P-O-L)
Division 4.14 River Conservation District(R-C)
Division 4.15 Reserved
Division 4.16 Downtown District (D)
Division 4.17 River Downtown Redevelopment District (R-D-R)
Division 4.18 Community Commercial District (C-C)
Division 4.19 Community Commercial - North College District(C-C-N)
Division 4.20 Community Commercial - Poudre River District (C-C-R)
Division 4.21 Commercial District(C)
Division 4.22 Commercial - North College District (C-N)
Division 4.23 Neighborhood Commercial District (N-C)
Division 4.24 Limited Commercial District(C-L)
Division 4.25 Reserved
Division 4.26 Harmony Corridor District(H-C)
Division 4.27 Employment District(E)
Division 4.28 Industrial District(I)
Section 6. That all cross-references in the Land Use Code to Division 4 shall be
renumbered accordingly.
Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 5th day of
September, A.D. 2006, and to be presented for final passage on the 19th day of September, A.D.
2006.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Passed and adopted on final reading on the 19th day of September, A.D. 2006.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk