HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 07/11/2006 - HOLIDAY DISPLAY POLICY DATE: July 11, Zoos WORK SESSION ITEM
STAFF: Wendy Williams FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION
Holiday Display Policy.
GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED
1. Does Council want to change the City's current policy regulating holiday displays on
City property?
2. If so what approach would Council like staff to pursue?
PP
BACKGROUND
In November 2005, Rabbi Yerachmiel Gorelik, Executive Director of the Chabad Jewish Center
of Northern Colorado, contacted the City about placing a menorah in Old Town Plaza during
Hanukkah. The Rabbi was referred to the DDA, owner and manager of Old Town Plaza. The
DDA denied the Rabbi's request on the grounds that the DDA does not permit privately owned,
unattended displays on the Plaza.
The Rabbi then asked that the menorah be placed on public property owned by the City, such as
Oak Street Plaza, where the City displays a Christmas tree and lights, or at the south end of Old
Town Plaza, on City right-of-way. The City denied the Rabbi's request, also on the grounds that
the City does not allow private, unattended displays on its property. The City also declined to
add a menorah to its own holiday display.
The Mayor and City Manager, in discussions with the Rabbi, expressed a willingness to ask the
Council to review the content of the City's holiday display, and consider whether it should be
expanded in future years.
OPTIONS:
The following is a list of possible options for the City's holiday display downtown. This list is
based on suggestions and comments that were received from citizens at the Mayor's Open Mic
meeting in March, that were submitted to the City's website, and that were made by the panel on
the April edition of Crosscurrents on Cable 14.
1. Have no City-sponsored seasonal display or decorations at all.
2. Decorate downtown with white lights only.
3. Leave the display as it is now (tree and white lights).
July 11, 2006 Page 2
4. Display traditional Christian symbols only.
5. Combine traditional Christian symbols with symbols of other faiths, such as a
menorah, with secular, seasonal symbols.
6. Rather than expand the City's display, designate a set number of areas on City
property for privately sponsored holiday displays that organizations could apply
and be issued a permit to use during the month of December.
7. Same as #6, above, but make the spaces available all year, since not every
religion or group celebrates major holidays in December.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City could potentially incur costs associated with purchasing holiday symbols,
administering permits, and providing maintenance and security for displays on City property.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Holiday Display Issue History.
2. May 12 memo re: holiday display policies.
3. Summary of Open Mic with Mayor and website comments.
4. Bernardsville Borough Ordinance.
5. Proposal from the Human Relations Commission, dated June 19, 2006.
6. Powerpoint presentation.
Attachment 1
HOLIDAY DISPLAY ISSUE HISTORY
In November, 2005, Rabbi Yerachmiel Gorelik, Executive Director of the Chabad Jewish
Center of Northern Colorado, contacted the City about placing a menorah in Old Town
Plaza during Hanukkah. The Rabbi was referred to the DDA which owns and manages
Old Town Plaza. The DDA denied the Rabbi's request on the grounds that the DDA
does not permit privately owned, unattended displays on the Plaza.
The Rabbi then asked to place the menorah on public property owned by the City, such as
Oak Street Plaza, where the City displays a Christmas tree and lights, or the south end of
Old Town Plaza, which is City right-of-way. The City denied the Rabbi's request, also
on the grounds that the City does not allow private, unattended displays on its property.
The City also declined to add a menorah to its own holiday display.
The Mayor did agree to participate in a menorah lighting ceremony, and the menorah was
eventually placed on Coopersmith's private property adjacent to Old Town Plaza. The
Rabbi recently stated on CrossCurrents that this solution was not entirely satisfactory to
him, because it was not a compromise on the part of the City, it was a private offer, and
because he believes his organization has a legal right to have the menorah on public
rather than private property.
The Rabbi referred the matter to the law firm of Lewin & Lewin in Washington D.C.,
which has previously represented other Chabad-Lubavitcher groups in their efforts to
have menorahs placed on public property. The City Attorney's office discussed with the
Rabbi and his attorneys the City's policies and practices, and existing legal authority that
supports the City's right to control the content of its holiday display and to prohibit
private, unattended displays on City property as long as that restriction is uniformly
applied and is not content-based. However, the Rabbi and his attorneys maintain that the
Chabad Jewish Center has a legal right to have a menorah displayed on public property,
one way or another.
The Mayor and City Manager, in discussions with the Rabbi, expressed a willingness to
ask the City Council to review the content of the City's holiday display, and consider
whether it should be expanded in future years
Attachment 2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Wendy Williams,Assistant City Manager
FROM: Ginny Sawyer, Neighborhood Administrator
DATE: May 12,2006
RE: Holiday Display
The following memo summarizes efforts made to determine holiday display or policy options in
other communities and in the private sector. These efforts did show that our current practice
does not differ significantly from other communities.
An attempt at determining holiday display policies in other communities proved to be
challenging. Like our own "unattended display policy" most of these policies are administrative
and are not available to an on-line search.
On-line requests were put out to both the CML attorney listsery and the City,County
Communications Association listserv, neither of which garnered any new information. On-line
searches mostly turned up court rulings regarding displays. One ordinance from New Jersey
was found that addressed incorporating a holiday display permit system(ordinance included.)
The following information was gathered through phone calls:
► Boulder has no specific written policy. Their decorations do not include any religious
symbols,only lights and snowflakes. (The big lighted star up on the mountain is not a
government display).
► Greeley does not have a policy. They do lights on City buildings,a tree in City Hall,and
a display with lights, reindeer,snowmen,nutcracker,and a polar bear in Lincoln Park.
► Colorado Springs displays low-key seasonal decorations(tree,wreaths,garlands.) City
enterprises(airport, hospital, utilities)also display seasonal decorations inside their
buildings. Outside displays are determined and managed by the Downtown Partnership
(a non-governmental agency.)
The following is information on other towns, unconfirmed, from a 12/10/05 story in the Rocky
Mountain News:
"Mayor John Hickenlooper will decorate his office with poinsettias and other holiday flora from the Parks
and Recreation Department greenhouse.
And he spoke not a word about changing the"Merry Christmas"sign at City Hall to the generic"Happy
holidays,"as he proposed last year before a flood of complaints triggered a rapid about-face.
A sampling of civic holiday displays found mostly secular items,although Denver's extravagant lights
display does have religious icons.
• A large Christmas tree decorated with bows,pine cones, violins and other nonreligious ornaments holds
center stage in the lobby of Jefferson County's Administration and Courts Building. County Administrator
Patrick Thompson said he doesn't know if the ornaments are limited to nonreligious themes by design or if
it is by coincidence.
The county's Christmas tree also sprouts paper ornaments with tags containing the names and ages of
youngsters who might face a bleak holiday unless a county employee takes a tag and donates a gift.
"I think that is what(Christmas)is all about,"Thompson said."You should see the gifts that come up here.
They are actually quite generous."
• Decorations at Lakewood's City Hall and Cultural Center feature such traditional Christmas details as
poinsettias,festive winter scenes and ornamental boughs,a long-standing practice,a city spokeswoman
said.
"We haven't changed our holiday displays,and it never has been an issue since I have been here,"said Joni
Inman,who has been a city spokeswoman for 15 years."That's one issue we have not been mired in."
•The Boulder County Courthouse has wreaths with green bows.
• A wooden toy train adorns the Longmont City Center sign.
• Louisville's City Hall features a Christmas tree with lights and a star.
• Boulder's Pearl Street Mail has reindeer made from branches and decorated with lights.
• Wheat Ridge City Hall has a sleigh and reindeer on the lawn and a Christmas tree outside the city
manager's office.
School district policies generally allow teaching about religious holidays but not celebrating them.Sacred
music is usually allowed to be performed,based on their musical value."
During a personal meeting with Alma Vigo-Morales,past City of Fort Collins Human Rights
Officer and former Director,Global Diversity and Inclusion at Agilent Technologies,she shared
her experience in the private sector which I have attempted to summarize below:
► For many years our communities have operated from an"everything equal/there is no
difference" mentality. This is no longer serving our citizens. HP and Agilent looked for
ways to create a safe and respectful environment for everyone and ways to truly enrich,
encourage,and promote diversity.
► These companies opened their holiday display and celebrations by not having a
"company" display and instead providing space and guidelines for employees to do their
own displays. There was designated space and the display had to be safe and respectful
to everyone.
► Alma acknowledged that there were times of significant push-back and that this was
usually planned and prepared for ahead of time. She felt that there are community
members in Fort Collins who are committed to diversity and inclusively who would
willingly help the City create guidelines for displays and also help prepare for potential
push-back.
Attachment 3
Open Mic with the Mayor
March 27,2006
Holiday Display Policy
Approximately 30 participants
The Mayor began with a brief history and parameters outlined by the CAO. The following timeline was also
provided:
Open Mic-March 27
Web-site-March 27 through the end of April(fcgov.com/holidayoutreach)
Cross Currents-April 27
Council Work session-May 23
Summarized citizen comments:
► The City could allow and permit 3 or 4 private displays
► Displays could be an educational tool focusing on cultural celebrations
► Question and concern regarding religious celebrations and ceremonies on public property(including
lighting of the Menorah.)
► Concern regarding maintaining separation of church and state;City should remain neutral with only lights
otherwise how many displays and symbols will the City allow?
► Would a daily set-up of a display get around the standing display policy?
► Distinguish between public and private displays and develop guidelines for those displays
► How will the City determine inclusiveness and create a neutral process?
► The City should only utilize what it already owns(lights and wreaths);no City dollars should be used to
expand the holiday display
► Continue to encourage the festive nature of the season in whatever decision is made
► Individual organizations could be allowed to fund and put up displays possibly by renting City space
► If the City opts for complete neutrality and a lights only display we will be missing an educational
opportunity to share and expose diverse celebrations
► Like the idea of cultural celebrations whether a 12 nights kind of thing or just one night
► Is neutrality too rigid and non0inclusive?
► Must be cost-neutral for the City
► Should not be arbitrator in deciding displays; will need standard guidelines
► Who decides the agreed upon displays? First come/First serve? How to address differences between
similar groups(Will all Christians agree on a display? All the Jewish community? Etc.)
► Our display policy will send a message about the City and about our identity as a City. There is a need
and a cause to recognize celebrations. This speaks to our foundations and our identity.
► Potential display content:Christmas tree, Menorah, Festival of Lights, [Nativity, Kwanza symbols
► Display locations could be spread out and rotated year to year
► How will participation be decided? What if few groups participate? What if a "fringe"group has a
display?
► The display should be educational and representative
► Please differentiate between displays and ceremonies on public property
► A permitting system would relieve the City of developing display content
► Policy must be flexible and yet not to the point of re-creating every year
► City could have a dedicated space for varying displays providing utility hook-ups(Ogden,UT example)
► Will music be included? If so, will need guidelines.
► Does a wider display policy actually cause more problems and isolate more people? A strict interpretation
of separation of church and state may provide greater long-term freedom.
► Expression of celebration is important;provides more freedom and ownership
► Are there any examples of private displays that are open to the public? (Woodward Governor.)
Holiday Display Comments ATTACHMENT 3
• Jump to page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>
Comments:
Mayor Hutchinson's comments in the Fort Collins Weekly were generous re: "proactive inclusion," and, in spirit, I
earnestly agree. I do hope there is thoughtful debate, though, on a rather contrary question. A municipality must
surely have the right to include, if inclusion is without prejudice. But can a municipality find any principle which
allows any EXclusion?This is a bit like C.S. Lewis's question: If Elijah goes to heaven in a chariot, can there be
horses in heaven? if horses, why not cows, goats, dogs, etc.--and finally, then, if there is no logical point of
stoppage, will there be mosquitos? Likewise, as to public displays, can a municipality allow not one, but two
religious displays? if two, then three? Seven?Twenty-five? Can we exclude, say, Muslims celebrating Ramadan;
and, if Muslims, Wiccans? If Wiccans, can we allow a tasteful display of holiday spirit on behalf of the American
Humanist Society? American Atheist Association? If so, and if David Koresh were still alive, would we welcome a
contribution from the Branch Davidian compound? And if...you see where this is headed. So, one principle to be
discussed and decided upon is the principle of lawful exclusion, even as we reach out proactively to include. How
can a municipality, if it once says Yes, ever say No? -
Al Heath
aldiheath@msn.com
Sent on: Thursday, June 29th, 2006 7:03 AM
Comments:
I spoke at the January meeting in favor of the menorah on city land for 8 nights. At that meeting the council
needed time to review other government policies. Now we are being asked for our opinion (this when the
Supreme Court has already rendered the survey moot). If public opinion is needed, the size of the crowd (over
200)at the Menorah lighting this past December, and the unheard of wait time of 30 minutes at a nearby
restaurant that night speak volumes of approval. Respectfully submitted, Larry Cohen President of Chabad of
Northern Colorado
• Sent on: Wednesday, June 28th, 2006 12:55 PNl
Comments:
I support the public Menorah on City property. Being the father of 2 young Jewish children in Fort Collins, this will
give my kids a chance to feel part of the city community during Chanukah. The Mayor's statement about the
current public display (simple Christmas tree), in my opinion, would be consistent with a Menorah. A Menorah is
quite a "simple" symbol as well. I attended last year's Old Town fighting and the speeches by the Mayor and Rabbi
highlighted the Menorah's symbolism - freedom for all. if a public Menorah were allowed on City property,
perhaps a plaque explaining this type of all-inclusive symbolism, not only for Jews but all people, would be
appropriate so that it does not appear that the City is approving a purely religious symbol, which 1 think is how lot
of non-Jews view the Menorah.
Also, you will probably receive opposition opinions from members of the only organized Jewish Temple in town,
Han Shalom. I too am a member and please realize that if other Jews, stating to be members of the Temple and
as representing the majority of Jews in Fort Collins, please do not accept this as fact. Our society has become so
fearful of openly embracing our Judea-Christian founding principles.This fear will only serve to undermine our
society and remove yet another solid social building block that helps raise healthy kids and families. Recall the
"War on Christmas" last year and how so many retailers finally fought back against this white-washing of religous-
based holidays. I personally have no problem hearing Christmas songs in the mall, even ones that include
references to Jesus, because I realize Christians represent the majority of this country. But by denying the
placement of a public Menorah would be synonymous with those secular folks that want to do a way with religious
"overtones" at Christmas as well. Please approve the placement of Menorah on City property. Thank you for your
time.
Sent on: Tuesday, June 27th, 2006 9:36 PM
Comments:
Under the impression that symbols of the Christian Holiday of Christmas are displayed on City property,i write to
• support the display of a Menorah to celebrate the Jewish Holiday of Chanukah on Fort Collins property.
Denial of such a display of the Menorah would be discriminatory and I cannot believe that that is the intention of
the City administration.
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/ 6/29/2006
Ronald E. Stickler
father and grandfather of residents of Fort Collins and of 3 genrations of students at CSU
Malibu, California
Sent on: Tuesday, June 27th, 2006 7:12 PM
Comments:
i think it was real nice, its america and we respect all relig.
Sent on: Tuesday, June 27th, 2006 8:03 AM
Comments:
Dear mayor,
Our world that we now live in, is full of evil,its full of darkness. Since 9/11 we began to look for hope,we pray that
the evil doesn't jump out and attack us,these symbols of the menorah... may seem very insignificant and old, but
in truth they are the contrary, they are full of hope.THe menorah showes how we defeated the evil and how good
prevails,we can not take away these things that mean so much to us.
menachem
Sent on: Monday, June 26th, 2006 7:12 PM
Comments: _. .._
Personally, I don't appreciate the city spending my hard-earned tax money on holiday decorations; there are
much more important and appropriate uses for any money collected by the city government. I don't think the city
should be using tax money or public property in such a fashion. Any display of holiday or religious items should be
left entirely up to private individuals and businesses.
Cathy Peterson
Fort Collins
Sent on: Monday, June 26th, 2006 1:46 PM
Comments:
Hi,
As I see it, Fort Collins has been putting up holiday displays for many years. Even Christmas lights are considered
religious displays, which are hung all around town. Preventing any religion from putting up a religious display, like
the disagreemnt over placement of the Channukah manorah last year in old town, is religious discrimination. if
the city wishes to prevent any one religion from putting up religious displays, it needs to not put up any christmas
displays, including christmas lights. However, I believe this would be a bad move, much less festive.
Sent on: Monday, June 26th, 2006 11:39 AM
Comments:
I believe that including the Menorah in the holiday display is necessary. Furthermore, with regards to Mayor
Hutchinson's article, the Christmas Tree is not a "generic" symbol of the holidays. If all three monotheistic
religions,(Christian,Jewish, and Islam) used the Christmas Tree as part of their holiday tradition, then yes, I
would agree that it is somewhat"generic". However, the Christmas Tree is truly a symbol of Christmas, it should
not be recognized as a "Holiday" Tree because, it is not. I have been a resident of Fort Collins for five years and
truly enjoy the display of lights downtown during the Holiday Season. I believe that the "inclusion" of the Menorah
in the holiday display is an important step foward for Fort Collins.
Thank you,
Fort Collins Resident
Sent on: Monday. June 26th, 2006 11:30 AM
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/ 6/29/2006
Comments:
Dear Colleagues:
• As a life-long educator, I have witnessed the disheartening effect on children when they feel invisible in the school
community.The diverse elements of a city likewise feel invisible when their particular contributions are not
recognized. Not only would you be embracing the diversity of Fort Collins by displaying the menorah during the
winter season along with the Christmas tree, you would also be acknowledging a Supreme Court decision which
ruled that the menorah is in fact a secular symbol of freedom and inclusion.
Sent on: Monday, June 26th, 2006 9:46 AM
•
•
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/ 6/29/2006
Holiday Display Comments
Jump to page: << Back 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>
Comments:
good morning, here is hoping that you will give us a chance to be represented in the
community.
Sent on Nnday, JJnP 26th, 2006 7:17 AM
Comments:
I think that it is very important to have the menorah on public property, for the menorah is the
symbol of right over wrong, of the good over evil, of the righteous over the wicked. futhermore
its important that the jews in fort collins should feel comfotable with their holidays just like the
christian feels comfortable with christmas.
hope to hear good news.
Sent on Monday, June 26th, 2006 2:14 AM
Comments:
I believe that our city government should not condone any display of religions symbols on
public property. It is unconstitutional. And this debate about just whose religious symbols
should or should not be included is exactly what the framers knew would happen.
Unfortunately, this often escallates into whose god is the real one. Let displays take place on
private property only. And despite the ridiculous Supreme court rulling, a Christ-mass tree is
obviously a Christian symbol and a Menorah is certainly a Jewish one, i.e., both are religious in
nature. They are in no way secular except in the minds of those who cannot accept the
separation of church and state. I urge you to stand by the constitution, that is your mandate. I
can buy the idea that Santa Clause and reindeer have become secular but that is it.
Sent on: Sunday, June 2Sth, 2006 9:17 PM
Comments:
We feel that there should be a Nativity Scene in Old Town Square. This is a Family Town and
this country was founded on Christianity and that fact should be addressed. Other cultures
should also be represented if they are also celebrated at that time---but not just to be inclusive
for all cultures. They should be represented at the time of their Holiday. This is Christmas and
all the displays that go along with Christmas should be displayed.
This is America, let's celebrate unity, not diversity.
Sent on: Sunday, June 25M, 2006 6:11 PM
Comments:
Freedom of religion, let ANYONE display there symbols
Sent on: Sunday, Ju ie 25th, 2006 12:15 PM
Comments:
I think the menorah should be allowed. If Christmas decor is all over town then there should
http://ci tynet.fegov.com/admi n/neighborhoodservices/index.php?pagel D=2 6/29/2006
not be a problem if other religions want to celebrate publicly. Our constitution says that
• freedom of religion and public demonstration is a basic right. Its rediculous that there is even
an issue about this, should be easily decided.
Neal Wohlmuth
Sent on: Sunday, June 25th, 2006 11:03 AM
Comments:
its about time that the people in colorado come to the realization that chabad lubawitch
headquarters of brooklyn sent one of its best scholars,a real gentelman down to fort collins to
renforce the jewish heritage and to give some meaning to peoples life in general.........do
yourself a favor by supporting rabbi y. GORELIK's good work,and give him a hand with his
programs and religious activity, you will benefit a lot from it...etc....... a big fan from N.Y.
C.M.H.
Sent or.: Sunday, June 25th, 2006 10:46 AM
Comments:
A Hanukkah Menorah on public display has now become a fixture in the US (and around the
world). This has become normal and should be adopted in Ft. Collins as well.
The menorah as I see it is a symbol of religious freedom.
Sent or.: Sunday, June 25th, 2006 8:36 AM
Comments:
It's distressing to me that such a 'to-do' about having a Menorah displayed along with a
Christmas Tree on city property. Aren't we a open society, where we all can practice any
religion we choose? So, how is it then, that a Christmas tree, as we all know, symbolizes all
Christian religions. So, isn't it proper and fitting for a Menorah to be displayed as well - seeing
that it actually is a secular and not a religious symbol.
I think it would be in very poor judgement if the Menorah wasn't allowed to be displayed, for
the 8 full days of the "holiday season", on city property. I urge the council to change their
policy to allow the Menorah to be displyed.
Sue Dyer, Laramie
Sent on: Swiday, June 25th, 2006 6:56 AM
Comments:
I moved to Fort Collins from Santa Monica, CA in 1994. I hoped, at that time, to return to a
more simple life; a life with fewer crowds, less traffic, less bigotry and exclusion. I was able to
attain a less crowded and less traffic lifestyle. Unfortunately, Fort Collins is rife with bigotry
and bias. The examples are everywhere, from low minority enrollment at CSU and inadequate
integration at some of the most highly regarded employers, to the absence of inclusionary
programs and availability of non-Christian, non-white products and services.
The city seems to support Christian and conservative white businesses and agendas to the
detriment of other religions and races. Certainly there are factions within the city that strive for
• and achieve equality, but they are sparse.
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/index.php?pageID=2 6/29/2006
Hobby Lobby refuses to sell Jewish items for the holidays and proudly extols their anti-Semitic
point-of-view. In fact, since 1994 I have tolerated, with increasing difficulty, the failure of local
businesses to address the needs of a large minority (and specifically Jewish) population. Where
can I buy Chanukah, Passover, and Yom Kippur gift wrap and cards? Nowhere really.
So, I am greatly interested in this ridiculous debate over holiday decorations and displays.
Conservatives and bigots alike seem to think (or at least they say they do) "if you give an inch,
'we'll' want to take a mile." What a shame there is such narrow-mindedness here.
I believe that Christmas is a secular holiday and not a religious one, and it is just one of
several holidays that occur in the winter months. Chanukah too, is not a holy holiday - as is
Passover and Yom Kippur - but a commemoration of the Jewish peoples' miraculous victory
over the Syrians.
Further, Kwanzaa, like Christmas is not a religious holiday. It was created in 1966 by Dr.
Maulana Karenga, to celebrate the African American values of community responsibility,
commerce, self-improvement, and family.
Since all three holidays are not religious in nature, there should be no reason to exclude one
and promote another. They should have equal footing under city and state laws and
regulations. And, in the interest of Fort Collins striving to maintain a policy of inclusion, as well
as promoting a progressive stance on what constitutes a winter holiday celebration worthy of
public display, all three should be considered equal.
In order to create a viable holiday display, Fort Collins officials should make every effort to
maintain the non-religious nature of each structure and, in fact, obtain input from non-
religious, but interested people.
Thank you,
Ar Foster
909 Whedbee Street
Fort Collins, CO 80524-3342
970.207.9798
Sent on: Saturday, June 24th, 2006 9:1.6 AM
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/index.php?pageID=2 6/29/2006
Holiday Display Comments
• Jump to page: « Back 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Comments:
It is most impressive to see Fort Collins address the sensitive issue of holiday display in such
an inclusive manner.
I wish you all the best in this effort.
Ed Rosenberg
Cape May Court House, N.J.
www.everyoneisincluded.us
Sent on: Friday, June 23rd, 2006 12:07 PM
Comments:
Ft. Collins is a very diverse city. As a city, we MUST RESPECT one another as individuals and
their beliefs in life. What is true for one is not true for another. I accept this. For a great many
years there has been a tradition to show respect and honor to our God Creater by displaying a
Christmas tree. The majority of people in the world believe in God, even the Jews. To place a
mennorah in OT, to me, represents TOLERANCE. Ft. Collins is either a Christian city or not. If
Ft. Collins sees itself a Christian community then it's time for our city to take a stand and NOT
let a mennorah be displayed. Ft. Collins must stand for someTHING, not EVERYthing. As
diverse as this city is, we'll slowly migrate to many displays of faith I We can RESPECT a
• person's belief in anything but that should not lead us down the path of TOLERANCE which, to
me, shows a fear to take a stand.
Susan Williams
Sent o: : Friday, June 23rd, 2006 8:59 AM
Comments:
I am in favor of an inclusive holiday display to celebrate cultural and ethnic diversity on city
property. I especially like the idea of the displays being located in Old Town.
Mary Pat Aukema
Sent an: Friday, Jane 23rd, 2006 8:12 AM
Comments:
Dear Honorable City Members,
I applaud you for being a part of a historical decision that will contribute to Fort Collins' image
of diversity.
By approving an ordinance to be inclusive of a public Menorah display that will be unattended
and located on city property will be an act that demonstrates the cities intent to reach out to
many groups while creating a more knowledgeable and understanding community.
I would like to inform the city that this holiday season, Colorado State University will be
• displaying a Menorah on the Lory Student Center Plaza which will be complimenting numerous
Christmas displays that will be influenced by a variety of cultures and religious beliefs. This
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/index.php?pagelD=3 6/29/2006
venture is supported by the Associated Students of Colorado State University, Mike Ellis,
Director, Lory Student Center, Michael Foxman, President, Chabad Jewish Student Alliance, as
well as the Christian Campus Ministry, Black Student Services, Hispanic Student Services,
Moslem Student Association and is being sponsored by numerous local and national
corporations and organizations. I truly hope that the city takes into consideration the image
that comes with such a historic and unique display that will receive national recognition.
Lastly, as someone who is investing a substantial dollar amount that directly contributes to the
economic development of this community, I want for you to know that I do this with the
mindset that this community is legitimately seeking to embrace diversity.
I trust that you will make the best and wisest decision on May 23rd, 2006.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Michael Foxman, Principal
Foxman Inc.
Gracious Living
Mulberry Metropolitan Village
Chairman of the Board,
Colorado State University
University Facility Fee Advisory Board
Sent on: Saturday, May 20th, 2006 3:27 PM
Comments:
Taking a survey like this seems useless. It is like Selma, Alabama discussing the size of whites-
only public facilities. The US Supreme Court has already taken a position on both issues. If
holidays are to be included in policy formation, Cinco de Mayo should be considered. The last
City Council meeting on this subject asked what the rest of the US was doing. From Hawaii to
the Vigin Islands the Menorah is publicly displaced for eight days. Christmas is only 1-2 days,
but the displays seem to go on for over a month at a cost to taxpayers of $3,000, Larry Cohen
Sent on: Wednesday, May 171th, 2006 9:41 PM
Comments:
Fort Collins is a diverse and tolerant community. It has been a privilege to live here for as long
as I have. This has been a main reason why I love it here so much. The City Council has done
an outstanding job taking care of the community over the years. It has been a wonderful
experience to be able to enjoy the beauty and cultural differences that this little city has to
offer. Allowing a menorah to be displayed is another example of this beauty. The story of the
menorah is at once a beautiful and sad story of the history of the Jewish people.
The community as a whole and the Jewish community will benefit greatly from this display and
the story it exemplifies. It is an affirming role that the city will undertake by allowing this
display to take place. It proves that the City Council members are open to the beauty that is
the Jewish cultural life. By allowing this to happen the City Council is opening up this beauty to
the general public and its views on tolerance and acceptance.
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/index.php?pageID=3 6/29/2006
Thank you for the time and consideration in this matter.
• Sylvia Loustaunau
Sent on: Tuesday, May 16th, 2006 11:58 AM
Comments:
I feel that since the winter holiday season coincides with an important Jewish
Celebration...Chanukah...the Jewish Organization, Chabad, Rabbi Yerachmiel Gorelik, should
be encouraged to display the Menorah on Public Property along with Christmas displays.
Christmas is showcased as the dominant and only holiday celebrated and it is time to
acknowledge other holidays and include them in the display. Thank you for considering this
request.
Linda and Larry Cohen
Sent on: Monday, May 15th, 2006 8:11 PM
Comments:
I recently attended a meeting at the City Library with Mayor Hutchinson regarding the holiday
displays. We strongly favor allowing private groups to create their own displays on public
property, with the city establishing the limitations for each display. Displays in different areas
of the city would contribute to the holiday enjoyment.
Milford and Sally Thieszen
Sert on: Wednesday, May 3rd, 2006 6:47 AM
• Comments:
My views are based on my firm belief that there is an absolute truth and one true God. I
believe in the Christian faith and would love our precious city to honor his incrediable love for
us by coming to earth as a 100% human being while retaining his complete 100% Godhood.
Yes, it was and is a miracle of huge proportions.
That tiny human infant was also infinate God and full of infinate love. He grew up in the usual
way of all people and then taught the people of his day how to have a personal relationship the
infinate God, using himself as a living and
dying object lesson.
After his three-year teaching travelling ministry; though acknowledged to be innocent of guilt
or crime, he was hideously tortured over many hours to the point where he was no longer
recognizable. Though three nine-inch nails were pounded through his hands and feet to hold
him to the wooden cross he had just carried up the long, long path to the crucifying hill of the
skull , or Golgotha, this is what he passionately cried out--
"Lord, Forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing." " While I was
yet a sinner, Christ died for me." Rom/Eph/Col
I have been freed from every wrong action, word, or even thought I've done. Jesus took my
jail time, my spanking, even my execution so he could declare me sinless and in right standing
with himself, God.
Yes! The joy, and awe and overflowing Thankfulness I feel for Jesus' CHRISTmas gift to me
(and all world) definately makes me want to display tidings of that redemption from death that
I can never pay back--everywhere.
•
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/index.php?pagelD=3 6/29/2006
I would be very happy to see the Nativity of Jesus displayed at parks, Government buildings,
homes, and businesses to proclaim and remind us all of what CHRISTmas giving and singing
and celebrating is all about. I vote to have "Joy to the world, the Lord has come!" on banners
in many locations because His birth and death and His raising from death three days after
killed has changed my life and given me freedom and peace and joy no matter what my
circumstances are at any given moment. Jesus was born, He died, and rose alive---for ME! ----
----------for You!
Sent on: Wednesday, April 26th, 2006 12:41 PM
Comments:
I would prefer to see a tranditional manger scene.
Sent on: Tuesday, April 18th, 2006 11:14 ? i
http://citynet.fegov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/index-php?pagelD=3 6/29/2006
Holiday Display Comments
• Jump to page: «_Back 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>
Comments:
Displays at Christmas should reflect our country's heritage as a Christian nation. It is fine to
allow for cultural and ethnic diversity, but it should be in porportion to the population of those
religious beliefs in our city. Banning religious symbols, such as nativity scenes, in favor of
commercialized and non-religious symbols, such as snowmen and santa clauses, celebrates
athesim, which is also a religious belief, by the way. It is time to celebrate the true meaning of
the "holiday" openly; Christmas is a celebration and rememberance of the birth of Jesus, the
son of God.
Terry Jackson
Sent on: Tuesday, April 18th, 2006 6:59 PM
Comments:
Despite the attempts of many to pretend otherwise, THE major holiday being celebrated by the
vast majority of people in this town during the "holiday season" at the end of the year is
Christmas. Christ-mas is by definition a day to commemorate the birth of Christ. Therefore, if
the city has a "holiday" display, then it is quite appropriate for this display to include things
which commemorate the birth of Christ (e.g. nativity scene). My argument is not specific to
Christmas. If a large fraction of people in Fort Collins were to start celebrating Hannakka or
• Ramadan or Ground Hog day, then displays appropriate for these holidays would be make
sense as well. It really shouldn't be that complicated of an issue.
Sent on: Tuesday, April 18th, 2006 4:50 PM
Comments:
The cultural history of the United States is Christian. Although other cultures attempt to be
represented during the Holiday Season, the reason for a Holiday Season in the US is the birth
of Jesus Christ. We should really attempt, as a city, to capture the real reason for the Holiday's
celebration.
Sent on: Tuesday, April 18th, 2006 4:50 PM
Comments:
I feel that during the Christmas/holiday seasons (which can include Easter) that individuals
have the right to decorate their property the way they want. I personally enjoy seeing displays
of mangers, crosses, and Bethlehem scenes during the season to commemorate the birth and
death of Jesus Christ....after all he is the reason for the season, not to sound cliche'.
Sent on: Tuesday, April 18th, 2006 4:20 PM
Comments:
Thank you so much for asking for our input and for making it easy to respond.
• Our family would love to have a manger scene, angels or other traditional Chrismas symbols
displayed for the Christmas holiday.
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/nei ghborhoodservices/index.php?pageI D=4 6/29/2006
Sincerely,
Marcie H. Stewart
Sent on: Tuesday, April 18th, 2006 2:31 PM
Comments:
I believe that the city should a nativity scene--Christmas is the birth of Christ celebration. The
city Christmas Tree is also nice.
Sent on: Monday, April 17th, 2006 10:21 PM
Comments:
I would like to see a traditonal Christmas display including the manger scene. Thanks!
Rachel Brandt
Sent on: Monday, April 17th, 2006 10:2.4 AM
Comments:
Please don't take the Christ out of Christmas. I don't believe that the displays should exclude
the very meaning of the holiday. I understand that it does mean different things to different
cultures. That is one of the beautiful things about this country. It seems that in recent times
while other beliefs and symbols have become more apparent and even taught in our schools,
Christian symbols and beliefs have been targeted as offensive and demanded removal by
some. Not to mention the utter lack of teaching about Christian beliefs in the school. Why is it
acceptable to learn about the menorah and what kwanza is, but not about a nativity scene? By
adding to the displays it can add an opportunity for all people to have their culture
represented. That does not mean that the Christian symbols should be lessened and certainly
not taken down.
Sent on: Wednesday, April 12th, 2006 9:13 AM
Comments:
Please display traditional Christmas symbols (manger scene, angels, star of Bethlehem, etc.)
along with those traditional symbols of other faiths.
Sent on: Tuesday, April I lth, 2006 9:13 AM
Comments:
Mayor Hutchinson, It has been my experience when addressing an issue of "concern" to
examine the meaning behind the concerns. What is the true motivation? Is it to silence a
majority to placate a definite minority? What is the offense of a time longed tradition? There is
no offense. It is a contrived effort to eliminate religion and it has begun with our publicly held
properties. Will it come to the "offense"of seeing Churches on street corners or Christians
publicly praying in restaurants? It has to stop, this is why I voice to you my strong objection
and suggest no compromise or it will never stop. I have witnessed the majority being silent for
many years. This is no longer the case. Please be prepared for a battle but know we are
praying for your strength and wisdom. Thank you for your availability, I realize today's office
holders are heavily burdened and under appreciated. Respectfully, Nan Mercer
Sent on: Morday. April loth, 20o6 6:?9 PM
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neigbborhoodservices/index.php?pageID=4 6/29/2006
Holiday Display Comments
• Jump to page: « Back 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next_»
Comments:
Please include the following traditional items in the Christmas (Holiday) display:
Nativity scene with the Christ Child
Angels
Star of David
Dove
Words: Jesus Christ, Immanuel, Peace, Holy
Religious Christmas Carols
There are a great number of Christian and/or religious residents living in Fort Collins. It would
be offensive to these residents and to the many Christian churches in Fort Collins not to
include the traditional religious displays of Christmastime. To exclude these would result in a
great disservice to our community and will represent a poor refelction upon the City of Fort
Collins and its Council Members. Thank you for your careful consideration.
Scott & Nancy Rutherford
Sent on: Monday, April 101h, 2006 12:40 PM
Comments:
Displays depicting what the season is all about, such as nativity scenes, angels, wreaths,
• santa's, reindeer etc is in my opinion what the city should display during the CHRISTMAS
season"
Sent on: Monday, April 10th, 2006 11:50 AM
Comments:
Dear Council Members,
Holiday displays are an important part of our community life. My family and I think a manger
scene and other traditional symbols of the Christmas story should be displayed along with
seasonally appropriate symbols of other faiths like a menorah, etc. This would be both
spiritually and educationally satisfying. It's a great opportunity to strengthen our community at
a time of year when some feel left out of the "holiday spirit".
We suggest these displays be set up in the Oak Street plaza for the two weeks before
Christmas. We would prefer that the cost of the displays and their maintenance were under
written by private parties. Perhaps a nonprofit entity could be established to receive donations
and to manage the project. The City could define legal guidelines in the terms of a use permit
issued to the nonprofit. The nonprofit would be accountable for selection and enforcement. I
would be willing to help with the administration of the nonprofit.
Thank you for taking extra time to seek public comment on this matter.
Allen Ginsborg
aginsborg@poudre.net
• Sent on: Monday, April loth, 2006 8:29 AM
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/index.php?pagelD=5 6/29/2006
�---------
Comments:
l prefer Christian decorations only
Sent on: Sunday, April 9th, ZO0hl:13PM
Cowvmmemts:
Somewhere in all the commercialism of the politically correct "holiday" season, there should be
displayed a nativity scene for Christmas, since this is the Christian celebration of the birth of
Jesus Christ.
Sent omSaturday, April 8th, ZOO65:J4PM
Comments:
I would like to get back to the real meaning of Christmas and see more Christian symbols. I
would love to see more nativity Scenes, angels and stars.
Thank you.
Sent on: Friday, Apri/ 7Vh, 2006 2:35 PM
Comments:
We would appreciate a holiday display that included a manger scene since we and many others
are celebrating the traditional Christmas celebration which has been a major part of the
American tradition since this country was founded. VVedo not believe that this holiday needs io
besn watered down that its roots are not acknowledged.
Thank you for the sincere effort on the city's part to take input from its citizens, and we
appreciate the way the initial meeting was run hy they mayor.
Elizabeth and Neil Miles
Sent on: Friday, April 7th, 2O06Z:2ZPM
Comments:
-Our family would prefer a Christmas display, and has no problem with other religions
requesting a display during their own holiday season.
-Rather than a display for celebrating cultural and ethnic diversity during the Christmas
season, we would suggest a summer festival over some weekend in the summer.
Private|ysponsoneUdisp|aysvvou|dbehne/ asivngastheysupportandinnowayattemopito
undermine the celebration and spirit of the particular season.
-We would prefer a traditional Christmas nativity scene being displayed during the Christmas
season, aswe would have no problem with a display of the crescent and star during Maw|id /\|
Nahi (nVnocwhenMus|irnsrecognizethchi|thof the Prophet Muhammad, occuringin the 12th
month of the Islamic calendar) if similarly requested by a large contingency of the people in
the community.
-We would suggest displaying items where there is the least opportunity for vandalism.
6itp://tityae|.[Lgov.xoou/udmuiu/uoigbbndbovdxorvitcu/iud*o.php?pxge{L)=5 6/24/2006
Thank you for the opportunity to share our thoughts! We appreciate you providing this means
• for dialogue!
Sent on: Friday, April 7th, 2006 12:53 Ph1
Comments:
I would like to see the nativity sceen down town at Christmas.
karen martin
Sent on: Friday, April 7th, 2006 12:45 PM
Comments:
Dear Mayor Hutchinson and Council Members,
Here are two votes for celebrating the cultural and ethnic diversity of our city during the
Holiday season. Limiting the expression to non-religious symbols such as Santa, candy canes,
wreaths, amounts to a dumbing down the celebration of our cultural and ethic diversity.
In regards to privately sponsored displays. We are in favor.
Some may find it offensive to have these displays on city property. I find it just as offensive
that the city would prohibit and regulate this expression of the tax payers cultural and ethnic
diversity. A prohibition of holday displays is a display in intself of religous and cultural
• intolerance.
Are we not an educated and enlightened city, secure enough
to celebrate a variety of beliefs and cultures during the holidays. I certainly hope so.
Sincerely
Bob & Rosalyn Seale
Fort Collins, CO
Sent onr Friday, April 7th, 2006 ] 1:35 AM
•
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/index.php?pageID=5 6/29/2006
Holiday Display Comments
Jump to page: « Back 1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:
I think a manger scene, angels, or other traditional Christmas symbols should be displayed
along with those of other faiths. Those displays should be in every public building in Fort
Collins. There is no good reason not to reflect the holiday beliefs and traditions of the people of
this city. The cultural elites have tried erasing religion from the public square. Take a look at
our public schools. Lets not let it happen with the city!
Sent on: Friday, Apri 7th, 2006 9:20 AM
Comments:
I would welcome traditional Christmas displays that include nativity scenes, Christmas trees
and angels.
Sent on: Thursday, April 6th, 2006 10:04 PM
Comments:
I would like to see displays of Christian symbols (manger scene, cross, etc.) as well as displays
of other faiths, especially Judaism and the major religions of the world, not recently invented
ones.
Rich McDermott
Sent on: Thursday, April 6th, 2006 5:41 PM
Comments:
I think the City of FC should allow perhaps 4-5
different holiday displays allowing for a designated
public forum. These displays would be privately
funded and sponsored, not city funded. The city could
issue permits for each display. Therefore, the city's role
would be in granting the permit and not endorsing any
particular message of the display. Of course, permit
guidelines need to be established in order not to
promote any hateful or demeaning messages.
The city could then celebrate the culture and diversity
of many different holiday celebrations.
Perhaps a community task force could be set up to
educate community members about certain holiday
traditions.
The City could utilize the FC Human Relations Commission
in helping to create this task force or community holiday
forum and use it as an educational tool, in the context of
history or comparative religions, rather than promoting some
religion. I feel this will help to establish a feeling of community
inclusiveness for many of the diverse populations in our City.
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/index.pbp?pagelD=6 6/29/2006
I did attend the Mayor's open mic session last night at the library but thought I would put it in
• writing.
Thanks
Caroline Tu Farley
Sent on: Tuesday, March 28th, 2006 9:27 AM
•
•
http://citynet.fcgov.com/admin/neighborhoodservices/index.php?pagelD=6 6/29/2006
Attachment 4
BERNARDSVILLE BOROUGH
ORDINANCE 200541411
AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING HOLIDAY DISPLAYS
AND CREATING A NEW CHAPTER IX IN THE BOROUGH CODE ENTITLED'DISPLAYS AND EXHIBITS
ON BOROUGH PROPERTY"
WHEREAS,the governing body has received requests from several organizations to place holiday displays on Borough
property;and
WHEREAS,there have been a number of cases involving challenges to municipal holiday displays;and
WHEREAS,the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in ACL U v. Schundler, 168 F.2d 92(CA3, 1999)upheld a Jersey
City holiday display which:
. . . contained not only a creche,a menorah,and Christmas tree,but also large plastic figures of Santa Claus and
Frosty the Snowman,a red sled,and Kwanzaa symbols on the tree. . . . [and]two signs stating that the display was
one of a series of displays put up by the City throughout the year to celebrate its residents'cultural and ethnic diversity.
WHEREAS,the court in Schundler based its decision on the United States Supreme decisions in Lynch v. Donnelly,
5 U.S. 668 (1984),and County of Allegheny v. Greater Pittsburgh ACLU,492 U.S. 573 (1989);and
WHEREAS,the governing body wishes to allow holiday displays in the Borough,but is cognizant of its constitutional
obligations as enunciated in the decisions cited above;
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Borough of Bernardsville,in the County of
Somerset,New Jersey as follows:
Section 1. There is hereby created a new Chapter IX in the Borough Code entitled"Displays and Exhibits on
Borough Property"which reads as follows:
CHAPTERIX
DISPLAYS AND EXHIBITS ON BOROUGH PROPERTY
9-1 Displays and Exhibits Prohibited. No display or exhibit by any person or entity shall be permitted on property
owned by the Borough except as hereinafter permitted.
9-2. Permitted Displays and Exhibits. The following displays and exhibits shall be permitted on Borough property:
a. Displays and exhibits at a public exhibition when specifically authorized by a permit issued pursuant to section
4-10 of the Borough Code.
b. Displays and exhibits at a special event when specifically authorized by a permit issued pursuant to section
4-12 of the Borough Code.
9-3. Holiday Displays. Holiday displays shall be permitted during the period from the Saturday before Thanksgiving
to the first Saturday following New Year's Day or for other holidays for periods not exceeding five weeks as follows:
a. Olcott Square. A non religious display consisting only of trees, flowers and white fights or other simple
decorations shall be permitted in Olcott Square. The governing body,in its discretion,may designate a
civic group such as the Bernardsville Garden Club,to decorate Olcott Square for the holidays and
throughout the year-
b. Borough Pond. The Borough Council may authorize not more than ten(10)organizations or individuals to
place holiday displays in designated areas at the Borough Pond. Applications to place holiday displays
at the Borough Pond shall be accepted by the Clerk until October 31•of each year. If more than ten
(10)applications have been received by that date,display areas shall be assigned by lottery.
Authorizations are for that year only and new applications must be filed every year. If any such display
includes religious symbols,such as a creche or a Menorah,it shall also include non religious holiday
symbols such as snowflakes,candy canes,Frosty the Snowman figures,or Kwanzaa symbols. If the
various displays,when viewed in their totality,appear to advance,endorse or disapprove of religion,
the governing body may require the displayers to add non religious symbols to their displays so as to
bring the displays collectively into compliance with constitutional requirements. If the governing body,
in its sole discretion,determines that the displays violate the First Amendment,it may order the removal
of all the displays.
94. Miscellaneous Regulations. All displays on public property shall be subject to the following additional
regulations:
a. Pemuttees shall provide their own electricity,which must comply with all relevant electrical codes
b. At the conclusion of the permit term,all displays must be removed from Borough property by the permittee Each
pemuttee shall be responsible for removing all trash and debris from the display area and shall restore that area
to the condition it was in prior to their display.
C. Each permittee shall provide the Borough with proof of insurance and a hold harmless and indemnity agreement
acceptable to the Borough Attorney and the Borough Risk Manager.
9-5. Not Public Forums. Neither Olcott Square nor the Borough Pond shall be considered a public forurn area.
9-6. Violations; Penalties. Any person violating any provision of this section shall be liable upon conviction to a fine
of not more than the amount specified in Chapter I, §1-5,or by a period of community service not exceeding ninety
(90)days for each offense. A separate offense shall be deemed committed on each day during or on which a violation
occurs or continues.
Section 2. Any or all other ordinances or parts thereof in conflict or inconsistent with any of the terms hereof are
hereby repealed to such extent as they are so in conflict or inconsistent.
Section 3. In case any article,section or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid in any court of competent
jurisdiction,the same shall not affect any other article,section or provision of this ordinance except insofar as the article,section
or provision so declared invalid shall be inseparable from the remainder or any portion thereof.
Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon final passage and publication as required by law.
COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF
ATTACHMENT 5
Fort Collins Human Relations Commission
P.O. Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522
f J
HOLIDAY DISPLAY PROPOSAL-Submitted on June 19,2006
Dear Mayor Hutchinson and City Council Members:
The following is a proposal to the City to mitigate the Holiday Display challenges seen in the past.
DESIGNATED PUBLIC FORUM: The City should designate a public forum,on city property,to allow for holiday
displays.
PERMIT SYSTEM:The City should issue permits for each display.Therefore,the City's role would be in granting a
permit and not endorsing any particular message of the display. Of course,permit guidelines will need to be established
in order not to promote any hateful or demeaning messages.
TIME PERIOD:Cultural celebrations occur on a year-round basis and access to public forum sites should be available
throughout the year.For example, if you choose a two-week December period,it excludes many other religious
holidays and basically guarantees only the Christmas holiday display each year since many holidays follow the lunar
cycle,which vanes from year to year.
FUNDING: These displays should be privately funded and sponsored,not city funded(this includes private funding of
the Christmas tree as well-in the case where it is open to all,the tree then can
legitimately be called a"Christmas"tree vs. a"Holiday"tree).
COMMUNITY EDUCATION: The Fort Collins Human Relations Commission can form a Holiday Display
community task force to use this as an educational tool,in the context of history or comparative religions,rather than
promoting a particular religion.
PUBLIC RELATIONS: Many communities will be watching to see what Fort Collins is doing. The reason why we
made news was because of what we were not doing(not allowing the menorah).Fort Collins should NOT gamer a
reputation of the city with"wide streets and narrow minds."The City's Holiday policy will affect how our city is
perceived.
If the City does not allow other displays,then the"holiday"tree should not be displayed.By allowing only the "holiday"
tree,this would be an exclusionary policy. The City's Holiday Policy must be to allow"ALL" or"NOTHING"to be a
fair policy.
If the city implements this proposal,we are teaching the people of our community to embrace the world,each
celebration at a time.This will promote a feeling of community inclusiveness for the diverse populations in our
community.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Human Relations Commission
ATTACHMENT
•
City Holiday Display
Policy Review
Presented by Wendy Williams,
Assistant City Manager
July 11,2006
Background
■ December,2005—Rabbi Gorelik,Chabad Jewish
Center of Northern Colorado,requests to have a
menorah displayed for the duration of Hanukkah on
• public property in downtown Fort Collins
■ City and Downtown Development Authority(DDA)
turned down request based on current policy
■ January,2006—City Council agreed to re-visit
holiday display policy and solicit public input
Current Practice
■ No unattended private displays allowed to remain in
place in Old Town Plaza(controlled by DDA)or on
City sidewalks or other City-controlled public
spaces.
■ Historically,the City display has not included
symbols such as the menorah,only a generic
Christmas tree
•
1
Policy Question
■ Should we expand the City's holiday display to
include a menorah and/or other religious or quasi-
religious symbols?
■ Legal perspective: City may choose to expand its
policy,but is not required to do so
■ If expanded,policy must include a balance of
secular and religions symbols and send a message
of community celebration without appearing to
endorse or advance a particular religion
Research & Comparisons
■ Online searches produced limited information
n Bernardsville Borough,New Jersey—ordinance that
requires a holiday display permit system
.10 or fewer organizationslindividuats may place a display
.must submit application,if more than 10 applications are
submitted,a lottery will be held'..
.If an organization display includes religious symbols.it must
also include non-religious holiday symbols as well
■ Phone calls to Colorado municipalities—learned
there are no written policies
Research & Comparisons
■ Displays that include trees,wreaths,poinsettias and
traditional seasonal decorations
.Greeley ■Colorado Springs
.Jefferson County ■ Lakewood
.Boulder County ■Louisville
■Wheat Ridge
■ Boulder display includes only lights,snowflakes and
reindeer
2
Research & Comparisons
■ Private Sector(Agilent Technologies)
■ No company displays
■ Space provided for employees to create their own
displays
■ Displays must be"safe and respectful"to everyone
Public Input
. March 27—Mayor hosted"Talk it Up"session at the
public Library
• .Approximately 30 citizens in attendance
■ April 27 Cross Currents program on Cable 14
■ Mayor's column in local newspapers-June
. Online web comment form at fcgov.com/council
a 54 citizens responded
Public Input
n Human Relations Commission(HRC)Recommendation
.Designate a public forum on City property for holiday
displays
.City issues permits;guidelines need to be established
.Displays should be allowed year-round
.Displays should be privately funded,including Christmas
tree
.HRC to form community education task force
.Policy will affect public perception of the City
.Must be"all or nothing"
•
3
Factors to Consider
. Holiday display vs.a display to celebrate cultural and ethnic
diversity
. Impacts of expanding the City's display to include privately
sponsored displays
. Potential limitations(content,size,number)on allowable
displays'.trees,reindeer,menorah,Santa,nativity scene,
snowman,candy canes,angels,wreaths,Muslim crescent
and star,etc.
. Areas that might be most suitable for the City's holiday
displays
Options to Consider
■ Option 1: Maintain existing policy of holiday trees
and wreaths on City-owned property
■ Option 2: Have no City-sponsored seasonal display
or decorations at all
■ Option 3: Decorate Downtown with white lights only
■ Option 4: Display traditional Christian symbols only.
Options to Consider
. Option 5: Combine traditional Christian symbols with
symbols of other faiths,such as a menorah,and other
secular,seasonal symbols
. Option 6: Designate a set number of areas on City
property for privately sponsored holiday displays that
organizations could apply and be issued a permit to use
during December
. Option 7: Same as#6 above,but make spaces available
all year,since not every religion or group celebrates major
holidays in December.
4
Questions for Council
■ Does City Council wish to amend the City's Holiday
Display policy?
. If so,which option do you wish to pursue?
■ Is any further information needed to help you make
your decision?
•
5