HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 10/07/2008 - RESOLUTION 2008-094 ADOPTING THE 2008 BICYCLE PLAN ITEM NUMBER: 29
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY DATE: October 7, 2008
FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL STAFF: Denise Weston
David Kemp
SUBJECT
Resolution 2008-094 Adopting the 2008 Bicycle Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution.
The City's Transportation Board approved the 2008 Bicycle Plan and recommends approval by the
City Council.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Approval of the 2008 Bicycle Plan does not create a direct financial impact for the City. Future
implementation of the Bicycle Plan recommendations may involve financial commitments by the
City and those items will be brought forward for City Council review at the appropriate time.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The 2008 Bicycle Plan is an update to the 1995 Bicycle Program Plan. The 2008 Bicycle Plan
presents existing conditions of the bicycle facilities,evaluates the City's accomplishments over the
last 13 years, and proposes recommendations for bicycle facilities and programs. The Plan further
articulates the vision for bicycling in Fort Collins, expanding its relationship beyond engineering,
education, encouragement and enforcement to include economy, environment and community.
BACKGROUND
The 2008 Bicycle Plan involved extensive public outreach over the last several years. It was
presented to several City Boards and Commissions, local organizations, a Citizen Advisory
Committee, and the general public. Many ideas collected through that process have been included
in the Plan. Comments made by the Transportation Board were addressed in the 2008 Bicycle Plan.
In addition, the following organizations and City Boards were presented with the Plan and have
provided support: Air Quality Board, Bike Fort Collins, Downtown Development Authority,
UniverCity, Economic Advisory Commission, Natural Resources Advisory Board, Parks and
Recreation Board, Senior Advisory Board, and the Youth Advisory Board. The 2008 Bicycle Plan
provides a platform for implementation of many bicycle-related improvements for the Fort Collins
community.
i
October 7, 2008 -2- Item No. 29
As an overview of existing programs, the 2008 Bicycle Plan specifically highlights the progress
made in Fort Collins with regard to engineering,education,encouragement,and enforcement since
the 1995 Plan. Beyond that, recommendations were made to continue efforts toward improving
bicycling opportunities in Fort Collins and are summarized as follows:
• Engineering: interim solutions, innovative solutions, improved signal detection.
• Education and Encouragement: expansion of existing programs.
• Enforcement: proactive campaigns, coordination and education for the public as well as
local enforcement agencies.
Furthermore, based on public input, the 2008 Bicycle Plan was expanded to address the following
areas of concern and provided the associated recommendations:
• Economy: bicycle-related tourism and bicycle-related commercial development.
• Environment: measurement methods of environmental benefits.
• Community: potential for Bicycle Advisory Committee, Platinum Level designation with
the League of Bicyclists.
The format and timing for implementation of the recommendations resulting from the 2008 Bicycle
Plan were not established as part of the Plan. This approach provides on-going possibilities for
community organizations as well as the City to use the Plan as a solid foundation to improving the
future of bicycling in Fort Collins. The Plan indicates some innovative planning measures but
encourages the evolution of ideas to improve bicycling. Finally, the 2008 Bicycle Plan maintains
the message that Fort Collins is a great place to ride for all ages and all levels of ability.
In addition, staff has recently learned of the recent upgrade in designation by the League of
American Bicyclists. As indicated in the attached letter, dated September 19, 2008, the League of
American Bicyclists has awarded the City of Fort Collins with a Gold Level designation.
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2008 Bicycle Plan—Final Draft.
2. Transportation Board memo.
3. Board and Commission minutes.
4. League of American Bicyclists letter, dated September 19, 2008.
5. Powerpoint presentation.
. ;.
,,V. i } PA JFA
iV
N r
It
MOM
1 � ,'�i+
. _ 2 «TTT. ♦ y. At
.-
ir
r.
1
t i
1 i' I !jfL 1p
' T1�
1. 0
IV
totlP
AJ-a�- .• I ....r.�wgww ... �w .0. , • - a. mn. m v.M
mmo, .14
u a 31
1i • im
� J
The City of Fort Collins would like to thank the following groups and
individuals . Your assistance has been invaluable .
Citizens Advisory Committee :
.John Clark Greg McMaster
Dot Dickerson ,Jeff Morrell
Dan Gould Rick. Price
John Holcombe Mick Vermuellen
John Homan
City Council
Boards & Commissions :
Air Quality Board
Bike Fort Collins
Downtown Development Authority
Economic Advisory Commission
Natural Resources Advisory Council
Parks and Recreation Board
Senior Advisory Board
Youth Advisory Board
City of Fort Collins Staff:
David Averill Kristin Kirkpatrick
Denise Weston Polly Bennett
Dan Holland Eric Bracke
David Kemp Kathleen Bracke
Holli Keyser Rich Brewbaker
Victoria McKennan Katie Carpenter
Ryan Mounce Gary Diede
Kurt Ravenschlag Dan Eybs
Rick Richter Craig Foreman
Larry Schneider Nicole Hahn
Ward Stanford Mike Herzig
Timothy Wilder
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction and Overview 1
Chapter 2 History of Bicycling in Fort Collins 7
Chapter 3 1995 Fort Collins Bicycle Program Plan 11
Chapter 4 The Bicycle in Current City Plans 15
Chapter 5 Local Participation 17
Chapter 6 Engineering 19
Engineering Recommendations 25
Chapter 7 Education , Encouragement & Enforcement 41
Education & Encouragement Recommendations 54
Enforcement Recommendations 56
Chapter 8 Economy , Environment , & Community 59
Economic Recommendations 61
Environmental Recommendations 62
Community Recommendations 67
Chapter 9 Multi - Modal Connectivity 69
Multi- Modal Recommendations 70
End-of- Trip Facilities Recommendations 74
Chapter 10 Conclusions 77
Tables
Table 1 Hot List I from 1995 Bike Plan 14
Table 2 Hot List II Proposed Projects 29
Table 3 Priority Commuter Routes 35
Table 4 Bicycle Parking at Community Facilities 73
Figures
Figure 1 Existing Bikeway Network 27
Figure 2 Proposed Improvements in the 2008 Bicycle Plan 28
Figure 3 Proposed Bicycle Signage 31
Figure 4 Planned Bikeway Network 33
Figure 5 Bike Box 38
Figure 6 Downtown Bicycling 49
Appendix A
Relevant Sections of Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards ( LCUASS )
Appendix B
Bicycle Parking Recommendations
2008 Bicycle Plan City of Fort Collins
This page intentionally left blank .
�r
t .ram L
dI
� t 1
' 'rf
. I.
Introduction and Overview Chapter 1
This 2008 Bicycle Plan has been prepared to update and expand upon the
7 995 Fort Collins Bicycle Program Plan ( 7 995 Bike Plan). The 7 995 Bike Plan
was developed by a group of citizens in conjunction with City staff and
outside consultants . The goal of the 7995 Bike Plan was to create a
community wherein choosing bicycling as transportation is an easy choice .
The purpose of the 2008 Bicycle Plan is to maintain that goal , while
expanding opportunities for the residents and visitors to Fort Collins to
incorporate bicycling into their daily lives .
As in the 7995 Bike Plan , the 2008 Bicycle Plan covers the traditional four " E ' s "
- engineering , education , encouragement , and enforcement as well as three
additional components - economy , environment and community , specifically
targeting the values expressed by Fort Collins ' residents .
The 2008 Bicycle Plan was created with input from many community
stakeholders , including neighborhood residents , business leaders , parents ,
educators , bicyclists , and individuals who wish to bicycle more often . A
Citizens Advisory Committee was formed , and provided significant input .
Additional input came from City staff in the following departments :
Transportation Planning , Traffic Operations , Engineering , Parks and
Recreation , Natural Resources , Streets , and Transfort .
Colorado State University ( CSU ) , and Poudre School District have also
contributed to the 2008 Bicycle Plan . To ensure sustainable efforts , input was
also gathered from many City boards and commissions including , but not
limited to the Air Quality Advisory Board , Downtown Development Authority ,
Economic Advisory Commission , Natural Resources Advisory Board , Parks and
Recreation Board , Senior Advisory Board , Youth Advisory Board ,
Transportation Board , and City Council .
It is through this comprehensive outreach process undertaken for the Bicycle
Plan that the topics of Economy , Environment and Community are added to
the 2008 Bicycle Plan . It is apparent that these issues are of value to the
citizens of Fort Collins .
The bicycle is the primary means of transportation for thousands of Fort
Collins ' residents , a desired means of transportation for many , and a form of
recreation for many more . Bicycling in Fort Collins accommodates and
encourages all ages and all levels of cycling ability . According to the United
States Census of Population 2000 , .Journey to Work Data , the bicycle - share of
work - related trips in Fort Collins is 5 . 8 percent . The energy and commitment
of the City departments , as well as local organizations and businesses , are
primary forces behind local bicycle efforts . The entire bus fleet for the City ' s
2008 Bicycle Plan 1 City of Fort Collins
transit service , Transfort , is equipped with bicycle racks , and bicycle parking
is available at numerous locations throughout the City . Several Fort Collins
Police Officers use bicycles , as do some of the inspectors for Neighborhood
Services . Fort Collins ' Transportation Planning Department and Parks Planning
and Development Division continue to develop multi - use paths for bicycle use .
Numerous local bicycle shops provide ongoing support and crucial services to
Fort Collins ' bicyclists . In addition , there are various advocacy , education , and
riding organizations enhancing community efforts .
The 2008 Bicycle Plan presents information on existing conditions as well as
recommendations for improvements targeted at the next 5 years , that will
result in a more efficient and effective bicycle network , with the intent of
supporting existing bicyclists and encouraging more people to ride more
frequently . These recommendations , as well as information on existing
conditions , are presented in detail in the individual chapters , with a summary
provided below .
Engineering and the Proposed Bikeway Network
The current bikeway network consists of approximately 280 miles of
bicycle lanes , 30 miles of hard - surfaced , multi - use paths , and many
more miles of local - street bicycle routes . Future bike lane projects will
take place with new street construction or reconstruction of existing
facilities , per the City ' s Master Street Plan . The City will continue to
explore rail and water corridors for future multi - use path development .
Recommendations
■ Continued implementation of projects identified on Hot List I .
■ Pursue implementation of projects identified on Hot List II .
■ Identify and implement interim solutions .
■ Continued implementation of the Transportation Master Plan and
the Master Street Plan .
■ Continue and improve maintenance of Priority Commuter Routes .
■ Improve signal detection loops .
■ Examine innovative bicycle traffic solutions such as bike boxes
and bike boulevards .
Promoting Bicycling through Education , Encouragement
Bicycle education and encouragement is concerned with developing safe
cycling skills in children , teaching adult bicyclists their rights and
responsibilities , and educating motorists on how to safely and
effectively share the road with bicyclists . It also includes holding
community promotional events and providing information such as maps
of recommended bicycling routes . Improvement to the level and
2008 Bicycle Plan 2 City of Fort Collins
consistency of enforcement is targeted at both the vehicular and bicycle
drivers and is directly linked to the education /encouragement
programs .
Recommendations
■ Maintain existing education and encouragement programs and solicit
more participation .
■ Continue to develop and implement innovative education and
encouragement programs , campaigns , and events .
■ Continue to foster relationships between non - profits , advocacy ,
and community groups and build public - private partnerships .
■ Consider the implementation of Cyclovias ( car- free events ) .
■ Improve wayfinding methods for bicyclists .
■ Reinforce yield and safety education programs pertaining to
bicyclists and other bike lane and trail users .
Enforcement
It is recognized in the 2008 Bicycle Plan that enforcement is a very important
part of the holistic strategy of educating people on how to bicycle and
providing an environment in which they want bicycle .
Recommendations
■ Work closely with local enforcement agencies to create innovative ,
proactive , educational campaigns .
■ Bridge the gap of understanding between bicyclists and local
enforcement agencies by providing current and consistent
information .
■ Coordinate training sessions to ensure knowledge on current
local , regional , and national bicycle policies and ordinances .
■ Establish enforcement techniques for handling special events and
protests .
■ Explore the creation of a Share the Road Safety Class .
■ Establish " sting " operations in coordination with local
enforcement agencies to address bicycle theft and traffic - law
evasion by bicyclists .
Recognizing Economic , Environmental and Community Benefits
Bicycling produces no air or noise pollution , decreases traffic
congestion , helps alleviate vehicular parking demand , saves energy ,
uses land and road space efficiently , provides mobility , saves
individuals money , improves health and fitness and , most of all is fun .
All of these benefits are good for the environment and provide
incentives for people to visit , relocate , and establish businesses in Fort
Collins , enhancing sustainable economic development . Community
2008 Bicycle Plan 3 City of Fort Collins
partnerships are crucial in maintaining and enhancing the most effective
opportunities to promote bicycling .
Recommendations
■ Continue to support and encourage infrastructure development ,
bicycle sporting events , recreational biking , and bicycle facilities .
■ Use the local bicycle culture to attract employers , new residents ,
business , and visitors .
■ Encourage bicycle - related businesses and manufacturers .
■ Establish measurement methods for environmental benefits .
■ Coordinate with other City initiatives to measure environmental
benefits .
■ Pursue the formation of a Bicycle Advisory Committee ( BAC ) .
■ Pursue the Platinum Level designation with the League of American
Bicyclists ( LAB) .
■ Establish performance measures for bicycle programs and facilities .
■ Maintain support for existing programs .
■ Foster communication amongst the public , non - profit , and private
sector to implement the recommendations in the 2008 Bicycle
Plan .
Multi - Modal Connectivity
City -wide , transportation connectivity will benefit greatly from the
recommended improvements for multi - modal connections , bicycle parking ,
and end - of- trip facilities .
Recommendations
■ Expand opportunities for bicycle - transit/ bicycle - pedestrian / bicycle - car
auto linkage .
■ Incorporate bicycle parking at transit stops and stations .
■ Improve and expand bicycle parking throughout the City .
■ Encourage installation of showers and changing facilities .
Despite the success of the 1995 Bike Plan , Fort Collins still has room for
improvement toward its ultimate goal of integrating bicycles into the daily
lives of Fort Collins residents and supporting the community bike culture .
The bikeway network still has significant gaps and discontinuities while the
quantity and quality of bicycle parking varies widely throughout the City .
People of all ages , from all parts of the city and all walks of life , have
requested improvements to the bicycling environment .
Bicycling , as a community value and expectation , is unique to Fort
Collins and is synonymous with its identity , as seen by both residents
and visitors . Many organizations throughout the city have a part to play
in educational , economic , environmental and community efforts . The
2008 Bicycle Plan 4 City of Fort Collins
City will continue to build relationships and work closely with existing
and future public , private , and non - profit organizations . With
established commitment from all sectors of the community , the
recommended increase of bicycle facilities and encouraged use of those
facilities included in the 2008 Bicycle Plan has real potential to improve
the quality of life in Fort Collins .
2008 Bicycle Plan 5 City of Fort Collins
This page intentionally left blank .
i
r • ,
a
i
Di
Ride your b'
front and rear lights. It could
save you the cost of a ticket
and quite possibly your life.
WW
lee
yr
3 0 exist
f
cg C�CBIKES
' co
.,, , . . . . , b�cyc/ing/coexist
, Y
History of Bicycling in Fort Collins Chapter 2
In the United States , bicycles were a popular means of transportation in the
pre - automobile age . In 1880 , bicycle enthusiasts formed the League of
American Wheelmen , later changed to League of American Bicyclists ( LAB ) ,
and successfully lobbied for a national network of paved roads . This effort
became known nationally as the " Good Roads Movement " .
Archival records from the Fort Collins Museum and Library system suggest
that the bicycle has long been a chosen method of personal transportation in
Fort Collins , as illustrated in the following images provided by the Fort Collins
Library District .
Clara Preston Haldeman with bicycle at
the Preston Farm , County Rd . 9; Fort
Collins , Colorado.
Courtesy of Preston Class Plate
Collection.
.ti
'rIfp I Won
JJ
1
Shoe Shop and Bicycles 9P
Repaired ; Corner of Walnut and ' a
TVA
Pine, about 1890, Fort Collins ,
Colorado. - L2. .
ion 3
Since the time of the Good Roads Movement , the automobile has become the
most popular means of personal mobility in the United States . In its infancy ,
it gave people the freedom to live farther from their places of work , giving
way to rapid suburban development . The bicycle - ideal for short trips - lost
its advantage as well as its place on the road .
Throughout the United States today , the bicycle is making a comeback . There
are an estimated 100 million bicycles in the country , and 60 million riders
( Bicycle Retailer and Industry News , 2007 ) . The Front Range of Colorado is
fortunate to have a climate that is conducive to bicycling year- round , whether
for recreation or transportation . According to research completed for the
2008 Bicycle Plan 7 City of Fort Collins
7995 Bike Plan , national and local surveys have found that more people would
be willing to cycle more frequently if cities provided better bicycle facilities .
The increase in bicycling over the last three decades may be due to several
factors . First , improvements in equipment such as fatter tires , sturdier yet
more comfortable frame geometry , and more user- friendly braking /gearing
systems make mountain and " hybrid " bicycles better suited to urban
commuting . Second , increasing environmental awareness , together with
progressive land - use and transportation leadership , has resulted in Fort
Collins having one of the more respected and user-friendly bicycle
transportation networks in the United States . Third , as more residents use
bicycles for daily transportation , there has been increased advocacy for
improved bicycling conditions . This has resulted in more miles of bicycle
lanes , routes , and multi - use paths ; more bicycle parking ; innovative education
campaigns ; and enhanced maintenance of existing facilities . All of these
factors have encouraged more bicycle riding .
These factors and a concurrent increase in the popularity of bicycling have led
to a growing recognition among policy makers of the need to treat the bicycle
as a serious mode of transportation . As early as the mid - 1 970 ' s , city staff and
elected officials of Fort Collins began to adopt standards that included
bikeways in road construction and reconstruction . In addition , as the City ' s
comprehensive plans have evolved , the bicycle has become an increasingly
important component of a desired transportation system that provides safety ,
efficiency and perhaps most of all , choice . This is reflected in the adoption of
plans and policies that are supportive of bicycle transportation .
The City of Fort Collins did not have an adopted Bicycle Transportation Plan
until 1995 . However , that does not mean that actions were not already being
taken to facilitate bicycling for transportation in the community . As early as
1977 , City staff had begun to identify and prioritize bikeways (typically in the
form of on - street lanes ) throughout the City . This effort was formalized with
the Transportation Master Plan of 1980 , which identified bicycle
improvements to be completed between 1981 and 1985 . The Transportation
Master Plan in 1997 , most recently updated in 2004 , includes plans as well as
financial recommendations for bicycle projects .
Through the early years , city transportation staff facilitated annual events
such as Bicycle Rodeos , Safety Fairs , and Bike to Work events , the foundation
for the ongoing bike events that we now enjoy year- round .
As policy and grassroots support has increased , additional funding has been
made available for bicycle transportation improvements . This has been true
on the local and state level , as well as the federal level through the 1990
Clean Air Act , the 1991 InterModal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
2008 Bicycle Plan 8 City of Fort Collins
( ISTEA) , the Transportation Equity Act for the 215` Century (TEA- 21 ) , and most
recently the Safe , Accountable , Flexible , Efficient Transportation Equity Act : A
Legacy for Users ( SAFETEA- LU ) , which allows flexibility in spending highway
funding through competitive grant processes on alternative modes such as
bicycling , walking , and transit .
Fort Collins has rigorously pursued grant monies for bicycle improvements
from sources such as Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality ( CMAQ) ,
Transportation Enhancements (TE) , and Great Outdoors Colorado (LOCO
lottery funds ) . Since 1995 , the City has secured over $ 20 million in federal
grants .
The increased usage of bicycles , advocacy from the community , and increased
policy and financial support from all levels of government has resulted in
significant bicycle transportation improvements . The 2008 Bicycle Plan is a
direct result of these changes and is intended to set an aggressive course
towards fulfilling the mission of expanding opportunities for the residents of
Fort Collins to incorporate bicycling into their daily lives .
2008 Bicycle Plan 9 City of Fort Collins
This page intentionally left blank .
DON ' T BE TGUYm M��M *
! *%;w t )
Aip
out n sidewalks
fr st ,
doh it, Your bicycle.
00
e
yeas
� , 1
' o Pxisfi
( AWARENESS
COURTESY.
(AMBIKES
1995 Fort Collins Bicycle Program Plan Chapter 3
The 1995 Bike Plan was a comprehensive effort undertaken by city staff and
community members with consultant assistance . The overarching goal was to
bring forth goals and recommendations that aimed to help build a city where
bicycling for transportation is an easy choice to make .
In the 7995 Bike Plan , the intent of the various goals and objectives were
refined into the following key recommendations :
■ Hire a Bicycle Education / Encouragement Coordinator on City Staff.
■ Expand the Fort Collins Bicycle Law Enforcement Program .
■ Adopt or Amend applicable City Standards .
■ Adopt or Amend applicable City Policies and Plans .
■ Expand Efforts on Matters Involving Maintenance , Signalization and
Parking .
■ Implement the Fiscally Constrained Plan for Bicycle Facilities identified
in the 7995 Bike Plan .
Each of these key recommendations has been addressed , in some capacity ,
over the last 13 years . The following is an overview of those efforts and
successes that have occurred since the implementation of the 7995 Bike Plan .
Additional information on existing conditions and future recommendations
are included in the subsequent sections .
Hire a Bicycle Education/Encouragement Coordinator on City Staff
The City currently employs an Education and Encouragement Coordinator .
The position was created in 1997 , a direct result of the 7995 Bike Plan .
However , the position was vacant from 2003 to 2006 . In addition to the
coordinator position , the City of Fort Collins has marketed the bicycle
education program known as FC Bikes . Further details on FC Bikes and the
numerous activities pursued by the coordinator are included in Chapter 7 as
well as on the FC Bikes website (www . fcgov . com / bicycle ) .
Expand the Fort Collins Bicycle Law Enforcement Program
Enforcement efforts have been ongoing including enhanced coordination with
the City of Fort Collins Police Department . A Bicycle Registry program ,
available on the FC Bikes Website , was initiated to improve bicycle recovery
rates and to deter bicycle theft .
Take Steps to Adopt or Amend applicable City Standards
Primary standards that apply to the development of bicycle facilities have
been amended and adopted since 1995 , including the following :
■ The creation and adoption of joint standards between the City and
Larimer County - the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards
( LCUASS ) , with relevant sections in Appendix A . These standards
2008 Bicycle Plan 11 City of Fort Collins
include the Fort Collins Multi - Modal Level of Service Manual which is
used to identify minimum requirements for bicycle level of service .
LCUASS also determines criteria for bicycle facilities designed for new or
reconstructed roadways as well as with proposed development .
■ The Fort Collins Land - Use Code has been amended to reference LCUASS
and the bicycle level of service standards , ensuring that they are applied
on a consistent basis . The Land - Use Code has also been amended to
require adequate , secure , and well - lit bicycle parking at all new
development and redevelopment sites .
Take steps to Adopt or Amend applicable City Policies and Plans
Significant changes in City Policies and Plans have been realized since 1995 :
■ City Plan , updated in 2004 , provides overwhelming support for the
bicycle and continuation of the development of land use patterns that
increase accessibility and convenience for all members of the
community .
■ The Transportation Master Plan of 2004 identified a comprehensive list
of identified capital needs in the community .
Expand Efforts on Matters Involving Maintenance, Signalization , and Parking
Coordination on bicycle matters involving maintenance , signalization , and
parking is continuously undertaken through several City departments : Streets ,
Traffic Operations , Engineering , and Parking Services . Maintenance concerns
are more readily identified and addressed as a result of the initiation of the
Adopt -A- Bikeway and Report a Bike Hazard link available on the FC Bikes
Website . Signalization , signing , and striping projects have been ongoing
throughout the City , with overall cumulative benefits . Bicycle parking
locations with bike racks have increased to approximately 350 locations
throughout the City , with a focus on downtown .
Implement the Fiscally Constrained
Plan for Bicycle Facilities Identified
in the 7 995 Bike Plan
Many of the projects identified in the
Fiscally Constrained Plan for Bicycle
Facilities have been constructed .
Along with the fiscally constrained
recommendations , the 1995 Bicycle `-
Program Plan provided a " Hot List " of
high priority projects . These
projects , a brief discussion , and
current status are shown in Tablel .
2008 Bicycle Plan 12 City of Fort Collins
To both residents and visitors , it is
apparent that great strides have been
accomplished because of the quality and
comprehensive nature of the 1995 Bike 1
Plan . It is also apparent that bicycling is
a choice and priority for many residents
and visitors in Fort Collins ; therefore , it is
imperative that the City continue
developing and refining policies ,
expanding its efforts , and pursuing
initiatives to further enhance
opportunities for bicycling in Fort
Collins .
2008 Bicycle Plan 13 City of Fort Collins
Table 1 . Hot List I from 1995 Bike Plan
Hot List I Status
Harmony Road to Horsetooth Road ( Mason Trail ) Partially Complete
Build underpass at Horsetooth ; build new trail .
Horsetooth Road to Drake ( Mason Trail ) Partially Complete
Build underpass at Drake ; assume use of bike lanes on McClelland .
Drake to Prospect- ( Mason Trail ) Partially Complete
Build underpass at Prospect ; build new trail , east side , rail right-of-way .
Prospect to Laurel ( Mason Trail ) Not Complete / Part
Improve roadway paralleling railroad right-of-way; other improvements . of Mason Corridor
Pitkin , College to Shields - Add Bike Lanes Complete
Laurel , Shields to College - Add Bike Lanes . Partially Complete
Horsetooth , Shields to College Complete
Improvements to the Mason and College intersections .
Lake , Shields to Center Complete
Elizabeth , Overland Trail to Taft Hill - Add Bike Lanes Partially Complete /
Identified in Future
City Project
Partially Complete
Laurel , Stover to Poudre River Trail - Add Bike Lanes .
Complete
Linden/Redwood , Vine to Walnut - Add bike lanes .
Partially Complete
Elizabeth , Remington to Lemay - Add bike lanes .
Not Complete
Taft Hill , Mulberry to Prospect - Widen the bike lanes .
Shields , Spring Creek Trail to Horsetooth - Widen bike lanes north of Drake ; Complete
maintenance needed as well .
Not Complete
Oak , College to Loomis - Improve/Add bicycle facilities , College to Howes .
Mulberry, College to Peterson - Add bike lanes , improve Remington , College Not Complete
intersection .
Drake , Shields to College - Improve railroad crossing , add bicycle facilities through Complete
College intersection .
Partially Complete
Drake , College to Lemay - Add bike lanes , College to Stover.
Poudre River Trail , College to Lemay - Improve tight turns at Linden ; improve trail Complete
access at Lemay .
Lemay, Riverside to Prospect - Widen existing bike lanes . Not Complete
Lemay, Prospect to Drake - Widen existing bike lanes . Not Complete
Lemay, Drake to Horsetooth - Widen existing bike lanes . Not Complete
Spring Creek Trail , Shields to College - Build a trail providing improved access from Complete
Shields .
2008 Bicycle Plan 14 City of Fort Collins
44
dew
Nook
ITIM
. i
Respect is a
two- way §tenet. _
Bicyclists are required
to make a complete
stria at traffic lights .
and stop signs. *.
t
R R
f~ 4 F
- t:
1pr" _
- i
r t
1 � 4
- �
IMF 4
.. .rtr
? r.
,ACBIIM
The Bicycle in Current City Plans Chapter 4
Since the 7995 Bike Plan , the City has succeeded in incorporating bicycle use
and bicycle facilities in numerous City policies and plans . Specifically , this
change has been integrated into the following planning documents :
City Plan ( 1997 & 2004)
Transportation Master Plan ( 1997
& 2004)
City of Fort Collins Land- Use
Code
Downtown Strategic Plan
TransFort Strategic Operating t • "
Plan
Fes:
Northside Neighborhoods Plan p Ok
East Mulberry Corridor Plan '` A I
1-25 Subarea Plan
Fossil Creek Area Reservoir Plan
Harmony Corridor Plan
Downtown River Corridor Plan s
North College Corridor Plan
Mountain Vista Subarea Plan
Northwest Subarea Plan
Larimer County Urban Area
Street Standards
Mason Corridor Vision Plan
US 287/South College Corridor Bike
Plan
Each of the above - listed policies or plans , along with others , contributes to the
development of opportunities for bicycling in Fort Collins . The 2008 Bicycle
Plan supports elements of these various plans while providing a strong
foundation for the preparation and implementation of future bicycle - related
improvements throughout the City of Fort Collins for the next 10 years .
In Fort Collins , the most important development supporting bicycling , of the
last decade , is the adoption of the 2004 comprehensive plan , City Plan . The set
of Community Values established in the City Plan are : Sustainability , Fulfillment ,
Fairness , and Choices . The Community Vision identified in City Plan recognized
the need to address all modes of transportation and encourage development
patterns that are conducive to pedestrian , bicycle , and transit travel .
Bicycle use is a critical element required to fulfill all four Community Values and
this is well represented by the goals , principles , and policies established in the
City Plan . The following excerpts from City Plan directly relate to bicycling
through the promotion of bicycle use and the implementation of bicycle
facilities is supported throughout the document .
2008 Bicycle Plan 15 City of Fort Collins
Transportation Goal
"Our community will develop And sustain a safe, convenient, And
efficient transportation system incorporating and integrating many
modes of travel including automobiles, transit, bicycles, and
pedestrians . "
Transportation Principle
"The bicycle will be a practical transportation choice for residents
and visitors . "
Transportation - related goals , principles , and policies established in the City
Plan provide the foundation for the City ' s Transportation Master Plan . The
same goals , principles , and policies carried through both documents directly
influenced the recommendations proposed in the 2008 Bicycle Plan for all areas
of concern , including engineering , education , encouragement , enforcement ,
environment , and economic development .
As a result of the adoption of the 2004 City Plan, 2004 Transportation Master
Plan , and all of the other supporting plans and policies since 1995 , bicycle
facilities and bicyclists have been significantly integrated into the transportation
network throughout the Fort Collins community .
Additionally , there are several other plans and initiatives being implemented by
other departments within the City that encourage bicycling as well as measure
the environmental benefits and evaluate the cost of transportation . Examples
of current City initiatives include the Climate Action Plan , Climate Wise , Mobility
Plan , and the Sustainability Action Plan . Coordination with these initiatives and
more will continue in the local pursuit to promote bicycling as a mechanism for
sustainability within the City .
2008 Bicycle Plan 16 City of Fort Collins
k
W
} r M J
IGHT 's
"
F { 1
t'I
FE
rM • 3 _ , APW
. 7 • 1.4
y � .
% J
h -
on
1 .0
�TM
•'�
_ 5
I .
Brae on the right hand � • {
side of the road with
the flow of traffic and
dory I ride the wrong way =
down a onem way street.
40
wit (?;bBlKES
•wa•.ntis. rat i• HLa ea�•+sir ' ~"�Q���$]Cla�
Local Participation L`�1 Chapter 5
The goal of the 1995 Bike Plan was to ensure that bicycle transportation
remained an easy choice for residents and visitors in Fort Collins . The goal of
the 2008 Bicycle Plan is to expand opportunities to incorporate bicycling into
the daily lives of our residents and visitors . Active , local participation is
required to accomplish this goal .
An extensive public involvement process was undertaken as part of the 2008
Bicycle Plan preparation . It began with the development of a Citizen Advisory
Committee ( CAC ) . The CAC provided recommendations on physical
improvements to our existing bicycle facility network . These recommendations
are included in the 2008 Bicycle Plan as the Hot List II in Chapter 6 . After many
meetings , much analysis , and numerous discussions , the CAC was able to
refine the Hot List II based on safety , continuity , and overall access for the
bicyclist .
In addition to the valuable input provided by the CAC , input was solicited from
the entire community on many occasions and through multiple venues .
Upon request by the City Council and the Transportation Board it was
suggested that further comment from local bicycle organizations , as well as
City Boards and Commissions , be obtained to ensure comprehensive
recommendations in the 2008 Bicycle Plan . In response to this request , a
presentation was prepared and shared with the following City Boards and
Commissions , as well as local bicycling organizations , throughout the
Fall /Winter of 2007 .
■ Air Quality Board
■ Bike Fort Collins , a local bicycle advocacy organization
■ Downtown Development Authority
■ Economic Advisory Commission
■ Natural Resources Advisory Council
■ Parks and Recreation Board
■ Senior Advisory Board
■ Youth Advisory Board
Specific suggestions , representative of many that were heard , are provided
below :
■ Pursue Platinum Level Bicycle - Friendly Community Status with the League
of American Bicyclists .
■ Create image and campaign of a bicycle friendly place to live , work , and
visit .
■ Expand Hot List II to include interim solutions and far reaching visions .
■ Address bicyclists of all levels .
■ Emphasize the mix of all transportation modes .
2008 Bicycle Plan 17 City of Fort Collins
■ Address continuity by eliminating or signing abrupt endings of bicycle
facilities .
■ Evaluate economic benefits /costs of a bicycle - friendly community .
■ Emphasize safety as a priority of the Bike Plan .
■ Include bicycle facilities in the City ' s Way Finding Study .
■ Support the pursuit of a downtown velodrome .
■ Identify and increase bicycle parking downtown .
The above recommendations were presented at a public workshop held in
December 2007 . Comments , suggestions , and recommendations collected
from the public as well as the above organizations were compiled and
summarized . The big - picture input resulted in adding a new chapter to the
2008 Bicycle Plan addressing the Economy , Environment and Community . Input
received has been significantly beneficial in developing a bicycle plan that
addresses specific community needs and provides recommendations based
directly on the comments made during the public input process .
A direct benefit of the public outreach process and a positive example of
community partnerships was City staff' s recommendation to implement interim
traffic solutions and to sign interruptions in bicycle facilities . The locations of
these implemented interim traffic solutions were identified through the help of
Bike Fort Collins , a local bicycle advocacy organization . Bike Fort Collins
conducted a public meeting during which local bicyclists identified the top 10
dangerous spots in the City . Further information on this project is provided in
Chapter 6 .
The 2008 Bicycle Plan demonstrates a concerted effort by the City of Fort
Collins to be a progressive leader in establishing and sustaining a bicycle -
friendly community . The plan is supported and encouraged by the people of
Fort Collins .
The subsequent sections establish existing conditions , successful results from
the 1995 Bike Plan and perhaps most importantly , provide recommendations
for the future based on the input shared by the public , local business
community , boards and commissions , and City staff.
2008 Bicycle Plan 18 City of Fort Collins
r `r
OOK
I 1 1 i �, I&1414,W I fly I lr v P
i
Lot
191
Another good reason to always wear
a helm et, the Righ t Ho ok is the # ?
accident between motorists and
brcycfists. !f is illegal for motorists y
to make a right-hand turn into
the path of a bicyclist.
L= 1t k ,„ LrCBIKES
Engineering Chapter 6
In order to provide a bikeway system that attracts both resident and visitor
bicyclists , and enhances opportunities for bicycling in Fort Collins , the City has
aggressively pursued development of a comprehensive bikeway network that
provides a high level of service and seamless travel .
Bikeways provide enormous benefits to both the cycling and non - cycling public .
Bikeways attract more bicyclists , resulting in cleaner air , less noise pollution ,
and overall quality of life benefits . Bikeways use public dollars efficiently by
reducing road maintenance costs and enhancing economic development .
Bikeways increase the carrying capacity of the transportation system by
lessening the demand for motor vehicle capacity . Well - established bicycle
facilities improve safety for all users ; bicyclists feel they have a secure space on
the road and motorists are aware of bicyclists ' presence and right to be on the
road .
In general , the word " bikeway" will be used in this plan to refer to bicycle lanes ,
signed bike routes , trails , off- street , and multi - use paths , all of which are
considered part of the bikeway network . For further clarification and to
facilitate the following engineering discussions , bikeways are grouped into
three broad categories : Priority Bikeways , Local - Service Bikeways , and Multi - Use
Paths . These designations are based more on the intended purpose of the
identified route rather than the physical treatment ( trail , lane , route or
otherwise ) of the facility . These distinctions allow discussions on the bikeway
network much like the roadway network - based on functional purpose , access
to land use , and design features .
The three categories of bikeways are summarized below , followed by details of
engineering design features , including examples within the existing bicycle
network shown in Figure 1 . Requirements and guidance on the design features
for the City of Fort Collins are included in the LCUASS .
Priority Bikeways
Functional Purpose
Priority Bikeways are designed to establish direct and convenient bicycle
access to all significant destinations within the City . These are usually
found on streets designated as arterials or collectors within the Fort
Collins street network .
Land Use and Development
Areas that are served by Priority Bikeways are employment centers ,
commercial districts , transit stations , institutions , recreational
destinations , and local / regional centers .
2008 Bicycle Plan 19 City of Fort Collins
Design Treatment, Traffic Operations, and Maintenance
■ Design treatments that should be considered for Priority Bikeways
are bicycle lanes , extra -wide curb lanes , wide shoulders , bicycle
boulevards , and way- finding signs for local street connections .
■ On - street motor vehicle parking may be removed on Priority
Bikeways to provide bicycle lanes , except where it is essential to
serve adjacent land uses .
■ All destinations along a Priority Bikeway should have sufficient end -
of- trip facilities ( i . e . bicycle parking ) to meet and support bicyclist ' s
needs .
■ Some Priority Bikeways are further designated as Priority Commuter
Routes and be maintained to minimize all surface hazards
including but not limited to : grates , potholes , manholes , trash ,
loose sand or gravel , broken glass , other debris , and snow .
Local - Service Bikeways
Functional Purpose
Local - Service Bikeways are intended to serve as local circulation routes for
bicyclists and provide access to adjacent properties and neighborhood
centers .
With the exception of controlled access roadways and State Highways , all
streets not classified as Priority Bikeways or Multi - Use Paths , are
considered Local - Service Bikeways .
Design Treatment and Traffic Operations
Design treatments to be considered for Local - Service Bikeways are shared
roadways , signed bicycle routes , traffic calming , bicycle lanes , and extra -
wide curb lanes .
Multi - Use Paths
Functional Purpose
Multi - use paths are designed to establish efficient , convenient , and
comfortable routes for bicycling , walking , and other non - motorized uses .
Land Use and Development
Multi - use paths are often appropriate in corridors not well served by the
street system to create short cuts that link urban destinations and origins
along continuous greenbelts such as rivers , park and forest areas , other
scenic corridors , and as elements of a community or citywide recreational
trail plan .
2008 Bicycle Plan 20 City of Fort Collins
Design Treatment and Traffic Operations
Given specific location constraints , multi - use paths often take creativity to
implement the most effective transportation system ; however , general
guidelines are summarized below -
Multi - Use Paths should be
t designed as separate facilities
that can be shared with
pedestrians and other non -
motorized users .
•/ yo d.r r
" r Multi - Use Paths should be
protected or grade - separated at
railroad crossings , rivers , and
intersections with major
AT roadways .
Multi - Use Paths should be
identified through appropriately-
_ = placed signage .
1
Bikeway Design Treatments
As described above , the appropriate treatment for a bikeway depends on the
street classification , anticipated bicycle destinations , motor vehicle traffic
volumes , speeds , and street widths . Design treatments designating bicycle
facilities in the City of Fort Collins are categorized and defined below .
Bicycle Lane
A bicycle lane is a portion of the roadway designated by roadway striping and
bicycle pavement markings for the exclusive or preferential use of bicycles .
Examples include Remington Street , Laurel Street , Swallow Road , and Harmony
Road . The bicycle lane design treatment is used almost exclusively on all
Priority Bikeways in Fort Collins .
Bicycle lanes can and have been implemented by 1 ) narrowing existing lanes , 2 )
removing a travel lane , 3 ) removing parking , except where it is essential to
serve adjacent land uses , and 4 ) shoulder widening . Bicycle lanes may be
implemented through stand - alone bikeway projects , through reconstruction or
construction of roadways , and through routine resurfacing of roadways .
However , when the street configuration requires significant modifications , a
public process must be undertaken prior to the addition of bicycle lanes .
Although bicycle lanes may be the preferred treatment , City Design Standards
require 6 - foot to 8 -foot bike lanes , and some streets contain circumstances that
make installation of this standard width very difficult . These circumstances
2008 Bicycle Plan 21 City of Fort Collins
include , but are not limited to 1 ) harm to the natural environment or character
of the natural environment due to additional pavement , 2 ) severe topographical
constraints , 3 ) economic or aesthetic necessity of retaining parking on one or
both sides of the street , 4 ) existing buildings or development that are adjacent
to the public right - of-way , and 5 ) high levels of traffic congestion that would
result from eliminating travel lanes or reducing travel - lane widths . These
circumstances , as well as public opinion , need to be evaluated carefully before
a decision is made to implement bicycle lanes .
Bicycle Route
A bicycle route is a bikeway upon which signage or pavement markings are
placed to indicate nearby destinations or another bikeway . Signed connections
are used primarily on local , low -volume streets where bicycle lanes are not
needed , as well as on or around major cycling destinations such as our
neighborhood and community parks , schools , Old Town , or the campus of
Colorado State University . Some examples include Mathews Street between
Swallow Road and the Spring Creek Trail , Hinsdale Drive , and portions of
Troutman Parkway . Bicycle routes are often the preferred method of
designating Local - Service Bikeways in Fort Collins .
Local streets providing short ( less than a half- mile ) connections between Priority
Bikeways or between a Priority Bikeway and a destination should ideally be
delineated by guide signs . Some streets that are already signed as bicycle
routes can be upgraded with bike lanes or way- finding aids that provide
directional information about destinations and connecting bikeways . In
addition , guide signs may be used to direct bicyclists to and around
recreational facilities or to an alternate route where the preferred street cannot
be modified due to serious financial or topographical constraints . Alternative
methods , when bicycle lanes are not possible , may include but are not limited
to wider outside lanes , wider sidewalks , shared roadway , and multi - use paths .
The appropriate treatment for local streets , not designated as a Bike Route and
with fewer than 2 , 500 vehicles per day , is a shared roadway .
Multi- Use Path
A multi - use path is a bikeway that is at least 8 - feet to 1 2 - feet in width and
usually separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier .
It can be located either within the roadway right - of-way or within an
independent right - of-way or easement . Multi - use paths are intended to provide
adequate and convenient routes for bicycling , walking , and other non -
motorized uses . Multi - use paths may be implemented in corridors not well
served by the on - street bikeway network . Good examples in Fort Collins
include the Mason Trail and the Spring Creek Trail .
The Fort Collins Transportation Planning Department and Parks Department
generally work together to plan and develop multi - use paths linking origins and
2008 Bicycle Plan 22 City of Fort Collins
destinations along continuous greenbelts such as rivers , creeks , irrigation
ditches , and recreational trails . Existing and future multi - use paths are
identified and advertised for public use on the most recent City of Fort Collins
Bike Map and on the City website . Many trails shown on the bikeway network
are already planned for implementation . Local examples include the extension
of the Poudre River Trail to areas east of Interstate 25 and the extension of the
Mason Trail north to Prospect Road .
A combination of all three design treatments is necessary
to make up a comprehensive bikeway network for an
entire community . The planning and implementation of
these design treatments can be relatively simple and
inexpensive , particularly if it occurs when the City re -
stripes a roadway with bicycle lanes during a routine
resurfacing . Design treatments can also be very
complicated and costly , as with bikeways that require
complete construction , widening , or grade - separated
crossings .
Bicycle Level of Service
All streets except high - speed freeways should be
: . . accessible by bicycle . Whenever streets are
reconstructed or constructed , appropriate bikeway
% ar., facilities are considered to accommodate bicyclists '
needs . This requirement is reflected in the adopted Fort
Collins Multi - Modal Level of Service Manual (Appendix A) .
This element of the City ' s Design Standards ensures that a minimum of Bicycle
Level of Service " C " will be met with new development and redevelopment .
These standards ensure that the bikeway network and conditions for bicyclists
continue to improve with community growth and development .
Street Standards for New Construction and Reconstruction
As previously stated , Street standards for the City of Fort Collins are provided in
the LCUASS and are used to specify the appropriate bicycle facility treatments
for all new , reconstructed , or rehabilitated streets . Where neither the
appropriate design treatment nor an acceptable alternative can be constructed
under reasonable conditions , bikeway facilities should be constructed on a
nearby (within a quarter mile ) parallel roadway or Multi - Use Path . This strategy
has been implemented resulting in the Mason Trail as well as Remington Street ,
both of which provide alternate bicycle access to destinations along South
College Avenue .
When a street or intersection is constructed or reconstructed , standard design
elements are incorporated into project design and construction whenever
possible . This includes evaluation of bicycle use on all roadways and
intersections , including roundabouts . When constraints exist and all standard
2008 Bicycle Plan 23 City of Fort Collins
design treatments cannot be accommodated , decisions are made on a project -
by- project basis through an interdepartmental review where all policies and
perspectives are considered to ensure bicycle access and safety .
Bikeway Network Development
Ideally , all streets should be accessible by bicycle and as previously described
bicycle facilities are phased in as streets are constructed or reconstructed .
However , many streets simply are not reconstructed or widened , especially in
older areas of the community with existing development constraints . These
areas of the community often persist as " gaps " in the bikeway network and
remain as obstacles to acceptable bicycle passage , access , and safety .
Examples illustrating this issue include but are not limited to : North Shields
Street , Taft Hill Road , and Prospect Road between Shields Street and Lemay
Avenue .
Existing Bikeway Inventory
As of March 2007 , within the City of Fort Collins , the current bikeway network
consists of approximately 280 miles of bicycle lanes , 30 miles of hard - surfaced ,
multi - use paths , and many more miles of local - street bicycle routes . These
existing bikeways form a fairly inclusive , interconnected network , as shown in
Figure 1 .
Maintenance
While implementing bikeways is important , keeping them in good condition is
equally important . When a bicycle lane becomes cluttered with debris , for
example , bicyclists are forced into the motor vehicle lane . Poor bikeway
maintenance can contribute to accidents and deter potential bicyclists .
Since the mid - 1980 ' s , the City has maintained a pothole response hotline that
allows motorists , bicycle commuters , or pedestrians a means of reporting street
hazards promoting the clearing of debris from on - street bike lanes . In 2005 ,
the City initiated an internet - based version , Report a Bike Hazard, in
conjunction with the new Adopt-a - Bikeway program . Both are accessible on the
FC Bikes Website . In a typical year , the City responds to approximately 250 to
300 requests . Policy states that service requests should be addressed within 48
hours . The City fixes approximately 99 percent of the requests - mostly
sweeping , road repair , signing or striping , and storm -water grate repair .
Approximately 1 percent of the requests were located outside of the City and
forwarded to the appropriate authority .
Traffic Signal Operations
While most traffic signals in Fort Collins operate at preset times , some signals
will not turn green until a vehicle is detected . Signals that depend upon vehicle
detection are identified as actuated signals . Actuated signals often have push
buttons designed for pedestrians . As a bicyclist , the only way to be detected at
an actuated signal is to be correctly positioned over a signal detector loop ( a
2008 Bicycle Plan 24 City of Fort Collins
sensitive wire buried in the pavement) usually in the shape of a diamond . The
loop detects the presence of metal in a vehicle and then relays the information
to a signal control box . However , for the bicyclist it is difficult to determine the
proper place to stop in order to trigger the detection loop , often resulting in the
bicyclist running the red light after an undetermined wait period at the
intersection .
The City of Fort Collins has about 165 intersections with some level of actuated
signals . The majority of signals are " semi - actuated " , meaning only the side
street or left -turn lane requires vehicle detection . The rest are " fully- actuated " ,
meaning all approaches and movements require vehicle detection .
Engineering Recommendations
Proposed Bikeway Network
The existing bikeway network , including Priority Bikeways , Local - Service
Bikeways , and Multi - Use Paths is designed to provide a high level of service for
bicyclists and encourage bicycle use . However , it has been requested by the
public , business community , and local officials that improvements be made to
further improve the bikeway network , both locally and regionally .
Recommendations resulting from the 2008 Bicycle Plan are to complete the
proposed projects in the 7995 Bike Plan , identified as Hot List I and previously
shown in Table 1 , as well as the additional projects proposed in the 2008
Bicycle Plan , identified as Hot List 11 and shown below in Table 2 . The
combination of these proposed improvements are visually identified in Figure
2 .
Overall recommendations proposed in the 2008 Bicycle Plan are a result of
significant public input . A review of current facilities , future facilities identified
in the Transportation Master Plan , and network connectivity were a critical part
of the evaluation process . In general , proposed bikeways were recommended
because they :
■ Connect bicyclists to desired destinations such as employment centers ,
commercial districts , transit stations , institutions , and recreational
destinations .
■ Provide the most direct and convenient routes possible .
■ Provide an alternative route where a Priority Bikeway may not be
available .
■ Provide an alternative route for less experienced bicyclists .
■ Fill - in existing gaps in the bikeway network .
■ Target locations with the potential for implementation in the next ten
years .
■ Lead a bicyclist to safe street crossings .
2008 Bicycle Plan 25 City of Fort Collins
This page intentionally left blank .
Figure 1 Existing Bikeway Network
t
•
i c . I
i ° E
H Vine j
i
f i
j -
Mulberry
1
Drake
I iF 1
y !f
�\ \` Horsetooth \
FW
1 �
j •4
j 1 0Ha mo t
.____.___.__
I j
I j
KecMer \.
I f
I 1
I j
I I
I
I I
I j
- r---4--fj I
Legend
Existing Bikeways Destinations
Bike Lanes — Scfiools Fort Collins
Growth Management
Area
Bike Routes Community i S. College Ave . CI}�`
Facilities "no Collins Fort Coll cyf ins
Multi-Use Path ! Parks Fort Collins / -,
City Limits
Figure Z Proposed Improvements in the Bicycle Plan Update
------
N
I
I ■ i
i
I
32 r i
d x 4
b a o ,line
+ MtAbwy I
— �M I
I
i - r
5 Drake 4
j Horsetooth 'y
I j
OMW
�----'------ _.-_—� Harmon ,r
I J
I j
j KecMer 1
I I
I I
I I
I j
I
!, I
I I
I j
I I
Legend
Remaining "Hot List I" Projects
Hot List II Projects
Existing Bikeways Destinations
City of
Bike Lanes — Schools ---- . . ------- - RroLWlins
anagement Area Collins MM Ort
A
Bike Routes Community S. College Ave
- Facilities "no ride zone"
MuRWse Path — Parks Fort Collins
City Limits
Several priority projects that will lend themselves to network development , and
also serve to encourage bicycle use were identified through the CAC established
for the plan production . The criteria and ranking process used focused on how the
proposed projects would increase safety , connectivity , and overall access for the
bicyclist . This resulted in " Hot List II " which consists of proposed projects
recommended for implementation within the next 2 - 5 years and is shown in
Table 2 . In addition to the location , there is a brief explanation of basis of the
CAC recommendation . Hot List II was produced for planning purposes and is
dependent on funding availability which may result in modifications as financial
opportunities are presented for individual projects .
Table 2 . Hot List II Projects
Hot List II Projects Rationale
Horsetooth , College to Stover - Bicycle lanes Existing gap in the arterial bikeway network
Laurel , Howes to Remington - Bicycle lanes Existing gap in the arterial bikeway network
or shared
Citywide Priority - Actuation at Signals A new project proposed with this plan
Mason Trail - Grade separation at Harmony Mason Corridor Project
Mason Trail - Grade separation at Horsetooth Mason Corridor Project
Mason Trail - Grade separation at Mason Corridor Project
Troutman/BNSF
Mason Trail - Spring Creek Trail to Lake St. Mason Corridor Project
Mountain , Meldrum to Riverside - Bicycle Downtown Strategic Plan
lanes or shared
Poudre Trail - Access to Timnath under 1 -25 Existing gap in the arterial bikeway network
Laporte , Overland Trail to College - Bicycle Existing gap in the regional bikeway network
lanes
Off-street Trail , Parallel Overland Trail - A new project proposed with this plan
Lions Park to Spring Canyon Community Park
Poudre River Trail - Extension to A new project proposed with this plan
Environmental Learning Center and
connection south to Drake Rd .
Citywide Priority - Resurface asphalt trails Identified Maintenance Needs
with concrete
Shields , Laurel to Poudre River Trail - Existing gap in the arterial bikeway network
Bicycle lanes
Prospect, Shields to Centre/Mason Trail - Existing gap in the arterial bikeway network
Bicycle lanes or off-street
Mason Trail - Grade separation at Drake Mason Corridor Project
Harmony, Cinqueifoil to Strauss Cabin - Existing gap in the arterial bikeway network
Bicycle lanes
Conifer, College to Lemay - Resurface lanes Identified Maintenance Needs
Riverside , Prospect to College - Bicycle Existing gap in the arterial bikeway network
lanes or off-street trail
2008 Bicycle Plan 29 City of Fort Collins
Some of the projects on Hot List II are large , costly , and may take some time to
secure funding . City Staff should continue to look for interim solutions to
address access and safety concerns with regard to the projects on Hot List II as
well as at other locations throughout the community .
During the public outreach process for the 2008 Bicycle Plan , appropriate
signage was recommended to improve notification and address continuity
concerns at several locations , as shown in Figure 3 . Signage installation at
these initial locations was completed in the Summer of 2008 and it is
recommended that this type of signage be installed at all appropriate locations .
Further recommendations include the full implementation of the Transportation
Master Plan , including the Master Street Plan and all of the associated bicycle
facility improvements . Currently , there are approximately 280 miles of arterial
and collector streets with bicycle lanes , while it is assumed that most local
streets are relatively comfortable for bicyclists . At full build - out of the Master
Street Plan , slightly over 90 percent of Fort Collins ' streets would have adequate
bicycle facilities . This long -term scenario is visually represented in Figure 4 .
2008 Bicycle Plan 30 City of Fort Collins
FIGURE 3 PROPOSED BICYCLE SIGNAGE
J IJN7RY0 BRp F9P
on
� = r ) h1OUNTAI - VISTA DRE UNTY
y w
Fes- r{
} A VI E I)R w E VINE aFZ
L - 92 � y
w PORTEAV z
W MIJ LBE ST _ 4 f RMULREF kYS7
I . V . ETH 37 Q
4
z
er ' PROSPECT D E p nSATRID
Ul
ri
� I
J 03
~ I 1'V DR KE RD E RAKE RD
,
Lu � I�
oc
HORS ETDO I RD # I E HORSET OTH RD w
I I
I i w
w — E H LMIIDNYRD� -- 1 Co ryJE
# - -
LOCATION NEW SM TYPE, SIGN LEGEND
HORSETOOTH: STJNFORD TO COLLEGE A, E AST1
LAUREL- REMINGTON TD HUY4'E9 AD
SHIELO9- NOR71i OF LAuKEL A 91KE L+ VE
E
TAFF WILL: ELItA9ETH TO� LAPORTE ImSHJkRE
RFVERSIpE A $adE
THE tug
ROAa TRAME g
'ELUABETH: WEST OF TAT HILL A, S A
FROSPEUP. EAST OF COLLEGE A
LWOOLN, OLD TCM N A
AdA NATHOREETOOTH e
COLLEGE AVE: CHERRY TQ 'Y' A City Crf
2008 Bicycle Plan 31 City of Fort Collins
This page intentionally left blank .
Figure 4 Planned Bikeway Network
- - ----- -
i
r
I
I
I r--y
1 —/ I
IfI r i
wrm ---
- -� \
I I
■ J _ `. i 7--I I� I
a I � \
WWI
r 1 � i
I `
pp
Haaatooth. 1
ll \
i I 4
I •4
I
Herinony
! I �JJ I I_—��•- � I
I I J � I I II II
I I
---- ewc i e -_
I
I ! I II
I
� r i- I ___-i� •,�---� it
• i 1
! J I
I I
I I ram`
7
Legend
Planned Bikeways
-------- Bike Lanes
Multi-Use Path
Existing Bikeways Destinations
Bike Lanes — Schools Fort Collins City`� °�
Growth Management
Area wort Collins
Bike Routes F7 Community -----•__- S . College Ave .
Facilities "no ride zone"
Mufti-Use Path — Parks Fort Collins
City Limits
Maintenance
The City aims to reduce the number of requests for routine maintenance by
increasing the amount of attention paid to the Priority Bikeways .
Improvements routinely requested by bicyclists through the Report a Bike
Hazard program are considered high priorities for regular maintenance .
As a result of the work. undertaken during the 2004 update of the
Transportation Master Plan , CAC input , public comment , and staff analysis ,
several Priority Commuter Routes have been slated for enhanced
maintenance . Enhanced maintenance should include but is not limited to
frequent sweeping and rapid snow removal . Currently , the majority of
requests for annual bikeway maintenance come after the City lays gravel
subsequent to winter storms . While the presence of gravel presents little
problem for motorists , it collects in bicycle lanes and on shoulders . This , in
turn , causes a safety hazard as well as a severe nuisance for bicyclists . In
response to this established maintenance need , street sweeping should be
scheduled as soon as possible following gravel distribution .
The Priority Commuter Routes are comprised mostly of Priority Bikeways that
link major activity centers and other important destinations throughout the
community , and are shown in Table 3 .
In an effort to mitigate the City ' s maintenance cost , local residents should be
encouraged to take an active role in reporting areas along the bike lanes and
bike trails where excessive debris has accumulated . The City ' s online
pothole /debris reporting mechanism allows for comments to be made
electronically and efficiently ( http : //fcgov . com / streets / pothole - re port . php) . In
addition , Fort Collins residents should also be encouraged during the winter
not to shovel or plow snow into the streets and /or bike lanes . Snow shoveled
into the street or bike lane will melt and then refreeze causing hazardous
conditions for bicyclists . Shoveled and plowed snow should remain on private
property .
2008 Bicycle Plan 35 City of Fort Collins
Table 3 . Priority Commuter Routes
Commuter Route Description
Shields St . Laurel St. to Trilby Rd . ( bike trail access)
Lemay Ave . Country Club Rd . to Carpenter Rd . ( bike trail access)
Overland Trail Drake Rd . to Poudre River Trail ( bike trail access)
Laporte Ave . Overland Trail to Taft Hill Rd .
Prospect Rd . Overland Trail to Shields St.
Harmony Rd . Taft Hill Rd . to Harmony Transfer Center
Timberline Rd . Mountain Vista Dr. to Carpenter Rd .
Horsetooth Rd . Taft Hill Rd . to Zeigler Rd . ( bike trail access)
Taft Hill Rd . Laporte Ave . to Harmony Rd .
Drake Rd . Overland Trail to Zeigler Rd .
Ziegler Rd . Drake Rd . to Kechter Rd .
W . Vine Dr. / E . Vine Dr. Shields St. to Taft Hill Rd . / N . College to Timberline
Centre Ave . Lake St . to Shields St . ( bike trail access)
W . Laurel St. Remington St . to Shields St .
Elizabeth St. Overland Trail to Shields St. and College and Lemay
Mason St. to Harmony Rd . to Lemay Ave . to Keenland Dr. to
Boardwalk Dr. McMurray Ave . to Harmony Rd . to Power Trail
( Horseshoe Trail access loop)
*Linden St.
Jefferson St. to E . Vine Dr. to Redwood Trail (bike trail
access)
* Redwood St. E . Willox Ln . to Conifer St. to Redwood Trail (bike trail
access)
* E . Willox Ln . Redwood St. to N . Lemay Ave .
* Mountain Ave . Grandview Ave . to Mason St. ( bike trail access)
. Laurel St. to Sycamore St. to Sherwood St. to Lee Martinez
*Loomis Ave . Park ( bike trail access)
* Remington St . Mountain Ave . to Spring Park Dr. to Mathews St . to Drake Rd .
( bike trail access)
*Swallow Rd . Dunbar Ave . to Lemay Rd . (bike trail access)
* Denotes commuter routes that will be cleared following priority routes
2008 Bicycle Plan 36 City of Fort Collins
Traffic Signal Operations
As previously stated , it is often difficult for bicyclist to trigger detection
devices at actuated intersections throughout Fort Collins . It is recommended
that alternative options be further researched and considered to minimize or
eliminate the inability of bicyclists to trigger traffic signal operations . Such
recommendations might include , but are not limited to , the following :
■ Installation of bicycle - sized detection loops in bicycle lanes at all
intersections with signal detection .
■ Installation of traffic signals with video or motion detectors at
intersections with high - levels of bicycle traffic . This approach tends to
provide a higher level of service for bicyclists
■ Encourage bicyclists to stop within the signal detection range necessary
in order to actuate the traffic signal by labeling the bicycle stop areas
with stencils .
As a result of the public input process for the 2008 Bicycle Plan , " presence "
detectors were installed at six intersections ( eleven approaches ) to increase
detection of bicyclists . Presence detectors make a call for a green light for as
long as a vehicle ( including a bicycle ) is present . Initial reaction to the
presence detectors has been positive ; however , public outreach to bicyclists
would ensure their ability to identify the proper stopping location to trigger
the new detectors . Effectiveness at these locations will continue to be
evaluated as part of the recommendation , as well as expansion to other
intersections . Video detectors have also been evaluated by the City but due to
the considerably- higher price tag , they are not scheduled for installation at
this time . The City will continue to seek new technologies for bicycle detection
at intersections .
Innovative Bicycle Traffic Solutions
Improving the ease and efficiency of bicycling , as well as the safety of the
bicyclist are high engineering priorities . The following innovative
recommendations are a good start to accomplishing these goals . However , it
is imperative that the City continue to be progressive and aware of all
potential opportunities to improve the transportation network for bicyclists .
Bicycle Boulevards
A bicycle boulevard is a shared roadway that has been optimized for bicycle
traffic . In contrast with other shared roadways , bicycle boulevards discourage
cut -through motor vehicle traffic , but typically allow local motor vehicle traffic ,
and are designed to give priority to bicyclists .
Bicycle boulevards are designed to offer the advantages of cycling on shared
arterials roadways that experienced bicyclists typically value , combined with
2008 Bicycle Plan 37 City of Fort Collins
the advantages of bicycle paths that appeal to inexperienced or young riders .
Experienced bicyclists can enjoy lower traffic volumes without significant
increases in trip time . For less experienced bicyclists , bicycle boulevards can
serve as " stepping stone " facilities that help them move from bicycle paths
and trails onto shared roadways .
Bicycle boulevards use a variety of traffic - calming elements to achieve a safer
environment . For instance , diverters with bicycle cut- outs at mid - block allow
motorists to enter the roadway in order to park or otherwise access a property
while allowing bicyclists to continue to the next block , but do not allow
motorists to continue through . Typically , these modifications are thought to
calm traffic , improve pedestrian safety , and encourage bicycling . The purpose
of a bicycle boulevard is to improve bicycle safety and circulation by having or
creating one or more of the following conditions :
■ Low-traffic volumes (or bike lanes where there are medium -traffic
volumes ) .
■ Discouragement of non - local motor vehicle traffic .
■ Free -flow travel for bikes by assigning the right- of-way to the bicycle
boulevard at intersections wherever possible .
■ Traffic control to help bicycles cross major arterial roads .
■ A distinctive look and /or ambiance to encourage bicyclists and make
motorists aware that the roadway is a priority route for bicyclists .
Bike Box
The bike box is an intersection safety design to prevent bicycle /car collisions ,
especially those between drivers turning right and bicyclists going straight .
The " Right Hook" is the most common accident between bicyclists and
motorists as illustrated in Figure 5 . It is a delineated box on the road with a
bicycle symbol inside . It includes bicycle lanes approaching and leading from
the box . The main goal is to prevent collisions between motorists turning
right and bicyclists going straight . At a red light , bicyclists are more visible to
motorists by being in front of them . At a green light , the bike lane through
the intersection reminds motorists and bicyclists to watch for each other .
Currently , the City of Fort Collins does not have any Bike Boxes . The most
appropriate locations for implementation should be designated in cooperation
with Traffic Engineering and based on vehicular and bicycle traffic volumes as
well as intersection design .
2008 Bicycle Plan 38 City of Fort Collins
Figure 5 - Bike Box
&wue the "right h W ' crd sal
Rid -ers i U a bicycle la ne ca n g et hit when a motorist t urns right at an
i rile rsecUorp ,, as depi c k ed h1ufe , F1v rk La rid is trying mUke xf " and
" rated bkyche Iaines t -o matte r ychsts more visi Me .
STANDAR D IN SECTION
I RITE RSECTION WITH BIKE BOX
Bike box at
si Q p bar
aLLaws hikes In
more in Irani
ci traffic at
irtit �r � � � t IUrti �
w
tlMIT l• OO w
Cam making r
right LurrL% CoLared bi kp
MY 110L SEM lane ano �
bI kasr and run YpkiiP -5MPE %
Into Lh (! M
_ SINS
ELM
1
Cary mU3+t h
I stop
behind
bux, and
Fnay not
turrt Fight
On rid
%Dwe., Cffy df p-0ttrMd THE S F A TTL E T4 616E
2008 Bicycle Plan 39 City of Fort Collins
This page intentionally left blank .
_ • � kA '
.
A �+
4 '� - / . 0t` � - - A 0 A` / � r\ _
az
-
� .
- /: ' :A . t :
/ > _ r � � . �;
- f
� -
� Air
� -
. -
. Iry a ) . ' L
, - loam
�
p .
@
_ -
\ �
« , .
` _
. L - -
� .
L .
L |IrCUIEV'S o c=x r
Education , Encouragement & Enforcement Chapter 7
One of the most effective ways to increase bicycling in a community is to
improve the bicycle facilities . Although several recommendations for bicycle
facility improvements were provided in detail in Chapter 6 , bikeway
improvements cannot be the only facet of a community-wide bicycle plan .
There is also a need for proper education , encouragement , and enforcement
in order to address safety , quality , and efficiency of bicycling .
Education goes hand - in hand with encouragement to increase cycling ;
together they improve skills and raise awareness . For example , a bike to work
day encourages more people to ride for transportation purposes : it also
teaches urban - riding skills , the importance of wearing a helmet and the
necessity of using lights at night . Teaching children cycling skills and the
importance of wearing a helmet builds their confidence as bicyclists and
encourages them to ride more often .
Existing encouragement measures in the community include :
■ Providing a bikeway network , end - of- trip facilities , and bicycle transit
service .
■ Holding event such as bike to work day , business challenges , and
festivals .
■ Providing information and /or maps with recommended cycling routes .
■ Providing education and safety programs , and other bicycle related
activities .
It is often asserted that the greater the presence of bicyclists on the road , the
more aware motorists will become . It follows then that over time both may
gain comfort around each other and do a better job sharing the roads of the
community .
Enforcement is critical in maintaining safety on the roadways for both
bicyclists and vehicular traffic , and since the position of the City is that
enforcement measures be rooted in education , they are addressed in this
same chapter of the 2008 Bicycle Plan . Education , encouragement , and
enforcement programs are recommended with high expectations for the most
effective results for the entire community . With better education , cycling can
and will become safer . Both motorists and bicyclists need to do their part to
make cycling safer and more attractive for residents and visitors in Fort
Collins .
2008 Bicycle Plan 41 City of Fort Collins
FC Bikes and the Bicycle ,
Coordinator ) ,BIKES
In response to 1995 Bicycle Plan , the City hired a Bicycle Coordinator in 1996 .
Beginning in 2003 , due to budget cuts the position remained un - staffed . In
2006 , City Council responded to a tremendous outpouring of public support
for the position and once again funded a Bicycle Coordinator for the City . The
implementation component of the 1995 Plan and now the 2008 Bicycle Plan is
known as FC Bikes and is managed by the Bicycle Coordinator .
Primarily funded by a Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality ( CMAQ) Grant
administered by the North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization
( NFMPO ) , the overall purpose of the FC Bikes program is to improve air quality
and ease roadway congestion by incorporating bicycles into the everyday lives
of citizens , Colorado State University students , regional commuters , and
visitors to Fort Collins . The FC Bikes strategy is focused on behavioral
change , encouragement , and education . By creating and maintaining a bicycle
- friendly community atmosphere and support system , the FC Bikes program
encourages citizens to use bicycling as their preferred method of personal
transport .
FC Bikes , as part of the City of Fort Collins ' Transportation Planning
Department , is responsible for :
■ Maintaining the City ' s bicycle planning and program web page .
■ Researching , developing , and pursuing funding sources , including
federal grants for future bicycle programs and events .
■ Serving as a contact point and ombudsman for bicyclists to City of Fort
Collins ' Departments involved with bicycle transportation , recreation ,
and public safety .
■ Replying to citizen complaints and concerns and acting as a point of
contact for issues related to bicycle non - profit operations .
■ Communicating with the public about bicycle improvements and or
temporary hazards .
■ Coordinating and cooperating with local bicycle - advocacy groups to
assist them in the planning , development , and implementation of
special bicycle education events and activities .
As the project manager of FC Bikes , the Bicycle Coordinator position also
serves as an ombudsman to the bicycle community . It is in response to public
requests for a liaison between the City departments that handle bicycle -
related capital projects / programs , operations , maintenance , enforcement , and
the various individuals , businesses , and organizations with an interest and /or
concern regarding bicycling in Fort Collins . The position provides for public
2008 Bicycle Plan 42 City of Fort Collins
awareness and comprehensive education regarding improvements to bicycle
facilities , bicycle events , bicycle lanes and trails and other bicycle - related
projects . The coordinator assists in organizing activities and information
among the various bicycle interests in the City . Community partners include
Poudre School District , Colorado State University , Poudre Valley Hospital , Bike
Fort Collins , and many others . To utilize resources effectively , the Bicycle
Coordinator relies on public , private , and non - profit partnerships to address
bicycling issues and to disseminate information . The position provides a
point of contact to increase public knowledge and awareness of facilities and
programs for bicyclists .
Recommendations provided on Education , Encouragement , and Enforcement ,
in the following sections , will be the primary task of the Bicycle Coordinator ,
with the support from the appropriate City Departments , primarily
Transportation Planning .
Education
Education is an important element in increasing bicycling while also improving
safety . People often assume that as cycling increases , so will the number of
crashes . This need not be the case as has been demonstrated in other cities .
The word " education " has many facets when it comes to bicycling . This
section will address several educational components .
■ Developing safe cycling skills in children .
■ Teaching adult bicyclists their rights and responsibilities .
■ Teaching motorists how to more effectively share the road with
bicyclists .
Target Groups and Existing Education Programs
Youth Bicyclists
School children are most effectively
reached when an action - oriented - -
teaching approach and repetitive
practice process are coupled with
awards and incentives . Awards and
4
incentives can consist of certificates of ;r �9
completion or bicycle / pedestrian
licenses , free or reduced bicycle
helmets and other accessories ( such as
bicycle lights or bells ) , or discount
coupons from area bicycle shops .
Safe Routes to School
The City ' s existing Safe Routes to School program has recently undergone a
major expansion . Focusing on five E ' s - Education , Encouragement ,
2008 Bicycle Plan 43 City of Fort Collins
Engineering , Enforcement and Evaluation - the Safe Routes to School program
works collaboratively with local elementary , junior high , and high schools to
provide programming and capital improvements throughout the city . After
establishing a Safe Routes to School Task Force in 2007 , Safe Routes to School
has been working collaboratively with community stakeholders to effectively
engage citizens , families and youth in getting more kids walking and biking .
Working in conjunction with Bicycle Colorado , Bike
Fort Collins , local bike shops , and local fire
departments , Safe Routes ensures that local youth
receive relevant and age - appropriate education y
information .
Safe Routes provides education to local youths and SCHOOL
their families through in - class education , social
marketing and events . Encouragement programs
include a spring Bike to School Day , fall -
participation in International Walk (and Bike ) to
School Day , and Walk and Wheeling Wednesdays .
Engineering and capital improvement projects are
assessed through site audits and solutions are
identified in conjunction with Poudre School
District , as well as several departments within the
City . In addition to the enforcement efforts of the
Fort Collins Police Department , the Safe Routes to
School program sponsors a mobile speed radar
unit and works with Traffic Engineering to deliver
the Traffic Tamers program where citizens can
track speeding vehicles with the use of a speed
radar gun . Evaluation efforts are implemented based upon best practices as
determined by the National Center for Safe Routes to School housed at the
University of North Carolina .
More information about Safe Routes to School is available at
www . fcgov . com / safe routes .
The City has been working closely with schools to ensure that school - age
children are receiving an age - appropriate bicycle safety message and are
learning skills that will help them function safely on the public right - of-way . A
Safe Routes to School Sustainability Guide for Sustainability and Best Practices
has been produced by the City for distribution to all of the schools in the
Poudre School District . Traditionally , Safe Routes has been targeted at
elementary- school aged children . It has been determined through close
coordination with administration , staff, students , and parents , that students
of all grades ( K - 12 ) can benefit from the general messages taught through the
2008 Bicycle Plan 44 City of Fort Collins
Safe Routes programs . The following messages have been consistently taught
through many mediums :
■ Wear a helmet . In the event of a bicycle crash , wearing a helmet
reduces the risk of serious head injury by up to 85 % .
■ Obey all traffic laws . Bicyclists have the same rights and consequently
the same responsibilities as others users of the roads .
■ Look both ways before
crossing streets .
■ Always ride with the flow of
traffic .
■ Be predictable . Always signal
your intentions . --
■ Be visible . Wear light colored ,
bright , or reflective clothingand always use a front light
and rear reflector at night .
■ Use the bike map . Look for a
route that is suitable to your
comfort and skill level .
■ In addition , very young children should ride with a parent .
■ When riding with a group of children , it ' s strongly advised that an adult
ride in both the front and to moniter disparate abilities .
Summer B. 1. K. E. Camp
Beginning in the summer of 2008 , FC Bikes , together with the City Recreation
Department , initiated a summer bike camp for youths . B . I . K . E . ( Bikes Improve
Kids ' Experiences ) Camp is a week- long , educational bike camp for children 8 -
12 years old that teaches children the basics of bicycling in a recreational
setting . B . I . K . E . camp addresses the following components of bicycling in Fort
Collins :
■ Road rules like bike safety , traffic signs / signals , and intersections .
■ Emergency skills like quick stops , scan for cars , and rock dodge .
■ Bike handling skills and drills on an agility fun course .
■ Recreational riding to familiarize children with riding bikes along the
Poudre and Spring Creek Trails .
■ Maintenance skills to include fix - a -flat , cleaning , lubrication , safety
checks , lights and bells .
B . I . K . E . Camp is a great example of private - public partnerships to develop
bicycle programs because it is funded by private sponsorships and facilitated
by City staff. Expansion of the program to different age groups and various
skill levels is already in the planning stage .
2008 Bicycle Plan 45 City of Fort Collins
Adult Bicyclists
Adult bicycles fall into several different categories of riders . Some adults are
comfortable riding on busy streets and mixing with traffic while others prefer
quieter streets or multi - use paths . There are adults who ride a bicycle only a
few times a year and those who ride often , though primarily for recreation .
Finally , some ride for their profession , such as bicycle police or messengers .
A large component of the adult bicyclists targeted with the education ,
encouragement , and enforcement programs are students at CSU . Each type of
adult bicyclist has his / her own concerns and philosophy about how bicycles fit
into the transportation system . Education and encouragement efforts must
recognize this fact and tailor messages to each group .
It is also important to reach as wide a range of bicyclists as possible . Since
adults do not often group together as a captive audience ( such as school
children often do ) , the City has provided a wide range of opportunities to
improve their knowledge and skills as they relate to bicycling . The following
messages have been provided consistently throughout all activities :
■ Be alert. Watch for other users and sudden behavior changes . Pay
careful attention to potential road hazards such as potholes and gravel .
Adjust speed to maintain control of the bicycle .
■ Obey all traffic laws . Although it is tempting to run through traffic
signals and stop signs , do not do it . Bicyclists have the same rights and
responsibilities as motorists . Disobeying traffic laws gives bicyclists a
bad reputation and is potentially dangerous .
■ Always ride with the flow of traffic . Ride where motorists and others
expect bicyclists , and never ride against traffic .
■ Be predictable . Signal your turns , do not weave in and out of traffic ,
and stay as far to the right as possible , except when :
o Traveling the same speed as traffic
o Avoiding hazardous conditions
o Preparing to make a left turn , passing another vehicle or using a
one -way street ( in which case riding along the left curb is
permitted )
o The roadway is too narrow for a bicycle and a motor vehicle to
travel safely side - by- side
o Riding alongside another bicyclist in a manner that does not
impede the normal flow of traffic .
■ Be visible . Wear light - colored , bright , or reflective clothing and always
use front and rear lights . Rear reflectors are also advised when cycling
at night .
■ Wear a helmet .
■ Use the bike map . Look for a route that is suited to your comfort and
skill levels .
■ Stay off sidewalks whenever possible . In Colorado , bicycles are
legally classified as vehicles and should behave as such . Unless
2008 Bicycle Plan 46 City of Fort Collins
specifically signed for shared use , as on bridge sidewalks or multi - use
paths , sidewalks are primarily intended for bicyclists . In some cases it
is appropriate for young or less experienced bicyclists to ride on the
sidewalk although bicyclists must always be watchful of pedestrians on
the sidewalk . When using sidewalks , bicyclists are required to warn
pedestrians audibly when passing (verbally or by bell ) , yield the right - of-
way in conflict situations , and travel at a walking speed at driveways
and intersections when a motor vehicle is approaching . Remember ,
that motorists are not expecting bicyclists to approach them at
driveways or approaches .
■ Do not drink alcohol and ride .
Other Bikeway Users
Apart from bicyclists , other forms of transportation are legally allowed to
move in the bike lane . Wheelchair users are able to utilize a bike lane in the
event an adjacent sidewalk does not exist or if a sidewalk does exist , but does
not provide adequate access for wheelchairs .
Motorized and electric scooters under 50cc ( cubic centimeters ) may use bike
lanes but are required to yield to wheelchairs and bicyclists in the bike lanes .
The City ' s non - motorized multi - use trails or bike trails include specific
stipulations regarding use . Bicycles , skateboards , and rollerblades must yield
to wheelchair users , pedestrians , and equestrians . No motorized vehicles ,
including electric assist bicycles or scooters , are allowed on bike trails
throughout Fort Collins .
Limited information on proper bike trail use can be found through the City ' s
Natural Areas and Parks Department .
Motorists
The main goal in educating motorists is to foster a broad range and general
public awareness / respect for bicycling . What would amount to a minor fender
bender between two motor vehicles could be a serious injury in a bicyclist -
motor vehicle crash . Information and education has been provided to
motorists on good driving behavior with the primary safety messages as
follows :
■ Be alert. Watch for other users and sudden behavior changes ,
especially at intersections .
■ Obey all traffic laws . Driving the speed limit and coming to a full stop
at red lights creates a safer environment for all .
■ Be predictable . Signal your turns well before an intersection . The law
requires use of turn signals in advance of intersections and bicyclists
depend on turn signals to judge where to be .
2008 Bicycle Plan 47 City of Fort Collins
■ Be patient . Passing bicyclists just before a stop sign or signal creates
an atmosphere of unnecessary hostility .
■ Do not honk unless necessary. Bicyclists can see and hear motor
vehicles ; honking may cause unnecessary alarm .
■ Give room . Bicyclists have to react to hazards that a motorist may not
see ( e . g . , glass , storm grates , dogs , car doors ) . Follow and pass at a
safe distance .
The Downtown Bicyclist
The City of Fort Collins and local stakeholders are working to make bicycling
safer for bicyclists and pedestrians in the downtown area . Bicycling on the
sidewalks in the downtown area is prohibited . This educational program has
an enforcement aspect to it as well . Police officers will ticket bicyclists and
skateboarders for riding in the dismount zone . As of September 2008 , the
cost of the ticket is $ 50 . 00 .
FC Bikes , Bike Fort Collins , Downtown Development Authority , Downtown
Business Association , and Police Services are working together on an
education and enforcement initiative to eradicate bicycling on the sidewalk in
downtown . Educational posters from the Coexist Campaign , public outreach ,
press releases , and e - mail list - serve notifications will precede an enforcement
component performed by the Police Services District One Station located
downtown . It is our goal that these two components , education and
enforcement , produce a behavior change in bicyclists downtown .
The following text is stated on the City ' s Police and Bicycle web - pages
regarding bicycling tips in downtown Fort Collins :
" Bicycling on College Avenue is legal but recommended for experienced
bicyclists who are comfortable riding with traffic . To access the downtown
area on low-traffic streets North and South , please ride Mason St . ( North
only) , Howes St . ( south only) , as well as Remington St . , and Mathews St .
Low-traffic East -West connections to downtown include Laporte Ave . to
Walnut , Mountain Ave . , Oak St . , Olive St . and Magnolia . Always be sure to
carefully cross railroad tracks at a 90 degree angle as the tracks can
otherwise "trap " a wheel causing an accident . Railroad tracks can also be
very slippery , especially during wet conditions .
Alleyways also create excellent low- traffic bicycle connectivity throughout
downtown , but be alert for pedestrian , motorist , and other bicyclist
activity . Ride predictably and respectfully . Communicate through the use of
hand signals , a bike bell , and ride with front and rear bike lights at night
when bicycling anywhere in the City of Fort Collins . Finally , always wear a
helmet . "
2008 Bicycle Plan 48 City of Fort Collins
For a complete view of bicycle routes through the downtown , as well as the
perimeter of the dismount zone , please refer to Figure 6 .
Figure 6 - Downtown Bicycling
W
CHERRYSTWake
Q
h�
a~o h
a MA E ST �Q� REST
Ok
= N FRS
O 0
x
z ORTEAVE LAPORTEAVE zUj
O O
m m w O 010
/R�SO �QFP
°o 3 0 i Z
K = f F T MBLE CT
w z
x z
N
z W MOUNTAIN AVEW MO AIN AV E MOUN19IN A
N i w
N
Z Q F
O w N
W W OAK ST H J z0 E AK ST
O N
3 0 U i
VJ W 0
W N
2 N IX V7
H O W OL E T IdOLIVE ST w
N S
f a
//me
N w w ro
O
MAGN LIA S J a E MAGNOLIA ST
J =
S
3 p U W
U1117
N �
MUL ERRY ST MUiERRY ST E MIJI BERRY ST
7�:
u1z �y
MY ST E MY TLE ST O 111
a v!
LU
yQ�
N + W =
H I a 3
at 11
Please walk bikes if using sidewalks in the Legend
dismount zone. The dismount zone runs
from Mathews to Mason (eastlwest) Recommended Bike Routes Railroad
and from LaPorte to Olive ( northisouth).
This zone also includes the Old Town Square Experienced Riders Only Alleyway
and Linden street from the Square to Jefferson St. (Bicycling IS permitted)
L 0 Dismount Zone I� I I Trails
2008 Bicycle Plan 49 City of Fort Collins
Existing Public Campaigns
The FC Bikes program strives to create and maintain an overall atmosphere of
safe and friendly bicycling in Fort Collins . Below are descriptions of current
campaigns :
■ Adopt - a - Bikeway and Hazard Reporting Campaign - This campaign
enables commuter bicyclists to take an active role in maintaining safe
bike lanes and bike trails . The adopt - a - bikeway program is a
partnership between FC Bikes and the Streets Department and is
designed to encourage bicyclists in Fort Collins to report hazardous
conditions along their favorite bikeway . By signing up for the Adopt - a -
Bikeway program , bicyclists pledge to report hazardous conditions
along their preferred Bikeway Route . Hazardous conditions include :
Large amounts of debris , such as , drag out or cinders , broken glass ,
potholes , cars parked in the bike lane , fallen limbs , or slippery paint .
This program is implemented through the FC Bikes website .
■ " Be Seen , Be Heard " Campaign - This campaign promotes riding at
night with bike lights . Legally , the State of Colorado requires bike
riders to ride at night with a front bike light . Use of front and rear bike
lights is strongly advised throughout Fort Collins . By sounding a bike
bell , bicyclists inform other road and trail users of their presence
thereby avoiding conflicts or collision . FC Bikes implements this
campaign by distributing bike lights and bike bells during special
events and through local bicyclists giving them to other bicyclists who
are without bikes and bells .
■ Coexist Education Campaign - Adult bicyclist and motorist education
is a two -way street . Bicyclists , as well as motorist , and pedestrians ,
need to be educated on how to coexist in an urban environment so that
close calls and accidents can be reduced . Colorado State University
students are one of the main target demographics for this education
campaign . FC Bikes worked with a local art photographer to create
visually- enhanced images depicting seven of the most important
messages for bicyclists and motorists :
1 . "Be Seen " - encourages bicyclists to ride at night with lights .
2 . "Don 't Blow It " - encourages bicyclists to stop at red lights and
stop signs at intersections where cars are present
3 . "The Blinder " - encourages bicyclists to watch for cars backing
out of diagonal parking spaces , and motorists to be aware of
backing out into the path of a moving bicyclist
4 . "Ride right " - encourages bicyclists to ride on the right hand side
of the road and to flow with traffic , not against it .
5 . "Right Hook " - encourages motorists that bicycles have the right
of way and educate them not to make right turns directly into the
way of a bicyclist .
2008 Bicycle Plan 50 City of Fort Collins
6 . "Share the Road " - encourages all modes to share the road .
7 . "Don 't Be That Guy" - encourages bicyclists to walk their bikes
on sidewalks downtown .
Educational messages must be entertaining and visually stimulating to be
effective . People are hit with over 5000 marketing messages a day , so we
must be effective in our efforts to grab a person ' s attention . Implementation
of this campaign is accomplished through print advertisements , flyers ,
posters , and electronic dissemination , such as websites and e - newsletters . In
the 2008 Bicycle Plan , these messages are incorporated into the Chapter
dividers - please take a look .
Encouragement
Bicycling Support System
FC Bikes provides a support system for the use of the existing and planned
bikeway network on a daily basis . The foundation for FC Bikes includes
information valuable to the bicyclist , is listed on the FC Bikes Website , and
includes the following :
■ Accident and close call reporting (track trends ) .
■ Bike trail and bike lane closure and detour information .
■ " Momentum " , an electronic newsletter providing current information on
commuting and bike events .
■ Free online bicycle registry for lost or stolen bicycles .
■ Online bicycle hazard reporting function .
■ Creation and update of the new Fort Collins Bike Map .
■ Working - map illustrating a network or grid of streets that will
consistently be free of snow , ice , and debris year- round .
■ BLT ( Bike Lunch Talk ) , a monthly venue for bicyclists to express
concerns and discuss local bicycling issues .
Events
Special events are an important means for FC Bikes to encourage bicycling .
FC Bikes has taken a year- long approach to events . This is a key strategy that
helps maintain momentum through all seasons . Each event has a specific
goal that may include attracting new bicyclists ; celebrating our local , rich
bicycle culture ; focusing on safe bicycling to school at the elementary , junior
high , secondary , and college levels ; and providing initiatives to keep bicyclists
on the road and supported during the winter months .
Spring Events - " Roll into Spring " - This program takes place from March to
May , and was created to attract new bicyclists . Past events and potential
future ones include :
■ Resources for Bicycling in Fort Collins - Part of the Environmental
Program Series , this event provides the opportunity to learn about
2008 Bicycle Plan 51 City of Fort Collins
bicycling in Fort Collins . Attendees have the opportunity to meet local
bike clubs /advocacy groups as well as get tips on commuting safely and
efficiently .
■ Bike to School Day - An
official Bike to School Day ,
this event is promoted in
cooperation with the -
Poudre School District . The )
event reinforces the A
ongoing Safe Routes to
School program and ,
targets students , staff +
faculty , and parents .
■ Earth Day / Bike Fair at
Colorado State University
- This event is produced in
conjunction with CSU and Earth Day efforts . It provides fun activities
associated with commuting in Fort Collins by bicycle .
■ Bike & Lunch - Through this event , FC Bikes collaborates with the Parks
and Recreation Department to reach older demographics . The event is
focused on promoting bicycling to this demographic by way of
interesting and fun social interaction .
■ Spring Warm Up Bike Rides - Fort Collins Cycling Club hosts this
" hands on " event by leading several rides for all abilities throughout
Fort Collins .
■ Community Bike Fair - Offered at the Downtown Transit Center , this
day- long event includes a bike swap , children ' s obstacle course and
bike rodeo , bicycle information booths , prizes , food , and entertainment .
■ Adaptive Cycling - Collaborating with Parks and Recreation
Department , this event seeks to encourage those with physical
disabilities to enjoy bicycling .
Summer Events - " Bike Week "
Coordinating the Colorado Department of Transportation ' s ( CDOT) annual
Bike to Work Day and Bike Month which is in June , Bike Week is a focused
program of culturally rich bicycle events that utilizes the energy of local
bicycling non - profit organizations and the resources of both public and
private partnerships . It also emphasizes the importance of encouraging
bicycling as a form of sensible transportation and creating a truly bicycle -
friendly community . Past events and potential future ones may include :
■ Commuter Kickoff - Bike Week kickoff event . This event encourages
hundreds of commuter bicyclists to meet for a short , early- morning ride
through Fort Collins .
■ Local Bicycle Films - FC Bike requests bike films produced by the local
community . The film showcases contest winners at local venues .
2008 Bicycle Plan 52 City of Fort Collins
■ Bike Pedal vs . Gas Pedal Challenge - Bicyclists will challenge motorists
on a 5 - stop errand race through Fort Collins .
■ Bike to Work Day -
Free breakfasts forL L
bicyclists ! The
tradition lives on . It is
our goal to attract ( ,J
over 4000 participants 1 l t
in 2008 and 2009 . -
■ Downtown Bike Show
- Downtown bike
show on College Ave . -
■ Cruise to the Movies
- One - cruise around
town before ending at _
New Belgium Brewery
for an outdoor bike movie .
■ Bike n ' jazz - Outdoor jazz musicians and refreshments Spring Creek
Gardens .
■ Bike Bazaar - Bike rodeo , bike swap , bicycle sculpture installation , bike
shop , non - profit booths , entertainment , and food .
" Ride Autumn " - The fall program addresses three key points dealing with
transportation throughout Fort Collins . Safe transportation to school for
students of all ages is the foremost objective . Sensible transportation
suggests an economical , environmental , and healthy means of transportation
like walking , bicycling , and riding the bus . Steady transportation means
developing a routine for implementing methods of sensible transportation on
a regular basis . Events focus on attracting new students , staff, faculty , and
parents as bicyclists .
In addition , the fall involves group recreational rides , New Belgium ' s Tour de
Fat event , and the following :
■ Safe Routes to School Program - Education and encouragement
program targeted at school - aged children , as previously described .
■ Annual Safety Fair - FC Bikes incorporates a bike rodeo into this event
providing a bicycle education and encouragement component for
children and their parents . The bike rodeo and helmet -fitting activity
teaches children bicycle safety .
■ Walk or Bike a Child to School Day - - In 2005 , more than 3 million
children , parents , and community leaders from 37 countries around the
world joined together in celebrating the International Walk to School
Day . The goals of the walk vary from community to community . The
Walk and Bike to School Day rallies for safer and improved streets ,
promotes healthier habits , and is environmentally friendly . This event is
2008 Bicycle Plan 53 City of Fort Collins
planned in cooperation of the City of Fort Collins , the Safe Kids
Coalition and the Can Do Organization .
■ Take a Kid Mountain Biking Day - Mountain biking teaches children
excellent bicycle handling skills that transfer to comfortable bicycling
trips to school and other rides in the urban environment . In addition .
this event requires parents to attend as well encouraging more of the
family to bicycle together .
■ Pedal to the Point - Recreational "fundraiser" ride .
■ Horsetooth Double Dip - Recreational " fundraiser" ride .
Winter Events - " Bike Winter Fort Collins " This program is designed to
support and encourage commuting by bicycle during the winter months , and
to help " bridge the gap " between fall and spring events . Past , as well as
potential future events include :
■ Bike Thru Winter - This workshop offers participants an opportunity to
"winterize " their bicycles by adding fenders , racks , lights , and baskets
thus making their bicycles better equipped for year- round
transportation . Attendees also learn tips on how to beat the cold and
ride smart .
■ Winter Bike to Work Day - The focus of this event is that , " If it can be
done in the summer heat , it can be done in the cold of winter . " This
event strives to break the negative stereotypes usually associated with
seasonal commuting by bicycle .
Education And Encouragement Recommendations
Given the magnitude of existing educational and encouragement programs
currently under way , recommendations for the future are to maintain the
existing programs and level of momentum .
Specific to Safe Routes to School, it is recommended that it be expanded to
include more local partnerships , additional schools , and extend to junior high
and high school levels .
Continue development and implementation of innovative and unique
education and encouragement programs , campaigns , and events . Foster
relationships between non - profits , advocacy , and community groups that will
strengthen public - private partnerships to initiate bicycle programs and
infrastructure .
Continue working with CSU on bicycling education , encouragement , and
enforcement programs , as well as coordinating on bicycle maps for both on
and off campus .
2008 Bicycle Plan 54 City of Fort Collins
Expand coordination with local businesses , initiate an incentive program to
improve bicycling facilities , and encourage programs that influence more
employees to bike to work . Examples of improving bicycle facilities include
providing secure , weather- free bicycle parking , and shower/ locker facilities for
bicyclists . An incentive program for employees might include some form of
compensation for those who bike to work .
Innovative community events are recommended such as the implementation
of a Cyclovia ( also Ciclovia) , meaning a car- free boulevard . Cyclovia means
either a permanent designated bicycle route or a temporary event closing of
the street to automobiles to allow dominance by other users . The most
prominent examples are in Colombia but the concept is growing in popularity
within the United States . For example , some cities block off main streets for a
car- free event every Sunday and holiday . Along the streets are walkers ,
skaters and bicyclists as well as other social and musical events . One of the
best reasons to implement a Cyclovia is that it promotes physical activity and
health . There are other obvious social and cultural benefits derived from
using the public streets as an open meeting area , as well as the environmental
benefits of cleaner air and increased safety .
For all education and encouragement efforts , it is recommended that
continued efforts be made to encourage additional demographics to take up
bicycling including but not limited to : senior citizens , minorities , business
executives , parents of elementary school children , and college students .
Enforcement
The intent of the 2008 Bicycle Plan is to propose complementary
recommendations for Engineering , Education , and Encouragement programs
that ultimately result in less enforcement of bicycle safety rules . That said , FC
Bikes is still engaged in the enforcement component of the bike plan to
ensure the most effective approach .
FC Bikes has been working with local government agencies , primarily
including Fort Collins Police Services , CSU Police Services , and Larimer County
Sheriffs , to provide effective enforcement through programs such as the " Be
Seen , Be Heard " campaign . This program has been well received . In addition ,
FC Bikes coordinates with local agencies to educate bicyclists regarding the
dismount zone , as referenced in the previous section on Education .
The Bicycle Coordinator also serves as a point of contact for local agencies
that may have suggestions or questions regarding enforcement issues . At the
same time , FC Bikes consistently sends an overall message through events
and media , that safe and respectful bicycling is just as much the responsibility
of bicyclists as it is motorists .
2008 Bicycle Plan 55 City of Fort Collins
FC Bikes has been working on instilling within the bike culture of Fort Collins
the concept of self- regulation and self- enforcement . This concept can be
achieved through peer influence and eye - catching marketing campaigns that
teach and /or influence bicyclists how to ride respectfully within an urban
setting .
Enforcement Recommendations
Enforcement measures should complement the other facets of the bike plan ,
specifically , the Education component . Education initiatives combined with
enforcement measures to ensure the success of many programs .
Implementation of enforcement measures should not be done in isolation ;
rather , designed in a comprehensive approach that utilizes other major
components of the 2008 Bike Plan such as education and encouragement .
In order to maintain a current and appropriate level of knowledge with regard
to bicycling , it is recommended that bicycling information be disseminated to
and from local enforcement agencies and the bicycling community . This is an
important aspect in order to maintain consistent City messaging regarding
local ordinances and to bridge the gap of understanding between bicyclists
and police officers .
Continue to work closely with local enforcement agencies to create innovative ,
pro - active education campaigns including enforcement that foster the safety
of bicyclists , pedestrians , and motorists .
Encourage and coordinate official trainings for local enforcement agencies to
ensure all City personnel are knowledgeable of current local , regional , and
national bicycle policies and ordinances .
Review and potentially update enforcement techniques for handling special
events such as critical masses and other protests to further bridge the
communication gap between bicyclists and local enforcement agencies .
Promote a constructive process to determine what types of behavior require
enforcement agency involvement .
Explore the creation of a Share the Road Safety Class . The class could be
offered as an educational activity or for first - time law violators , whether
driving , bicycling , or walking , to educate on specific laws related to bicycle
and pedestrian safety .
Regarding the theft of bicycles in the City , coordinate with local enforcement
agencies to set up sting operations using GPS tracking systems on bicycles in
2008 Bicycle Plan 56 City of Fort Collins
order to lead authorities to the thief and the evidence itself. These sting
operations may provide additional information on bike theft rings .
Coordinate with local enforcement agencies to set up crosswalk stings to
ticket drivers that don 't yield to pedestrians in addition to stings that ticket
bicyclists that ignore traffic laws .
2008 Bicycle Plan 57 City of Fort Collins
The page intentionally left blank .
2008 Bicycle Plan 58 City of Fort Collins
.y
i
y! + J Y
1
� •. � , yp. ri� - . pit, .
h
.14 xrr
lk
dt
i
JO ,
NOER >;• _
MEW
it # 1
Motorists, check twice before
backing up. Bicyclists ,
be aware of cars
backing out.
BIKM
Economy , Environment , & Community Chapter 8
This chapter addresses the connection between the bicycle and the economy ,
environment , and community , and was a direct result of the public outreach
process pursued during preparation of the 2008 Bicycle Plan . The need to not
only consider the connection but also to realize the effect a healthy bicycle
network would have in the City ' s goals of healthy environmental development ,
continued environmental stewardship , and a quality community .
Economy
The 1995 Bike Plan briefly touched on the economic benefits of bicycling in
the community . Now more than ever , Fort Collins is beginning to understand
the economic benefits of promoting bicycling within the community .
Infrastructure , sporting events , recreational biking , bicycling facilities , and a
desired way of life lead to a greater promotion and understanding of how the
bicycle can complement our City ' s economic considerations . Fort Collins '
unique bicycle culture appeals to its residents , future residents , employers ,
and visitors .
Destination for Bicycle - Oriented Travel
The foundation of cycling in this community confirms that Fort Collins has
earned its place in the history of competitive cycling in North America . In
1983 , North America ' s most prestigious stage race , the Coors Classic , passed
through Old Town on a leg from Cheyenne , Wyoming to Boulder , Colorado .
That was only the beginning ; currently , we have the pleasure of hosting
events such as the Fort Collins Cycling Festival , well established community
celebrations such as the Tour de Fat , competitive events such as the USA
Cycling Collegiate Nationals , and the Six Day Races at CSU ' s Oval .
Fort Collins is home to many cycling champions , including Eddy Gragus ,
winner of the 1996 United States Professional Road Race . In addition , the CSU
Rams Cycling Team is currently 3rd in the nation and has also brought national
recognition to Fort Collins . All of these accomplishments put Fort Collins on
the map as a bicycle - oriented destination , and help foster a sense of pride in
the bicycle community .
Bicycling , as a sporting event , has taken off in Fort Collins . As more residents
take up bicycling , so does the interest in bicycle sporting events . Bicycle
races make an excellent spectator sport . The energy of the peloton and the
racers brings an air of excitement and suspense to event attendees . Bicycle
sporting events can attract thousands of people to Fort Collins who in turn
spend money on dining , shopping , and accommodations ; therefore , the
2008 Bicycle Plan 59 City of Fort Collins
economic return is a worthy investment when planning and supporting these
types of events in Fort Collins .
The initiative of the Fort Collins
��► � — .— Velodrome Association to build a
c��►"'•= "= '` velodrome in downtown Fort Collins
is a community- based effort to bring
local , regional , and international
racing to Fort Collins . While a
velodrome in Fort Collins presents an
economic opportunity in the form of
a unique Fort Collins ' attraction ,
=� other benefits surface as well , such
as health and extracurricular
activities for a variety of Fort Collins
residents . A velodrome also has far- reaching community impacts such as its
potential partnership with CSU Rams Cycling .
Fort Collins is home to several bicycle recreation clubs . Through bike clubs
and special - event promotions , visitors come to Fort Collins to enjoy our world -
class road and mountain biking , then stay in hotels , shop , and dine out . The
truth to the statement that " Fort Collins is a Bicycle - Friendly Community , "
combined with the way the local culture embraces the bicycle , keeps visitors
coming back .
The Bike Fort Collins organization has a vision of creating a bicycle museum .
Currently , they have created the " Museum Without Walls " exhibit throughout
downtown Fort Collins . Vintage , rare bicycles are placed in ten business
locations . Residents and visitors of Fort Collins can enjoy a walking or riding
tour to these locations to learn about the history of bicycling . Perhaps in the
future , a Fort Collins bicycle museum will become a renowned destination for
bicycle enthusiasts .
In summary , there are numerous people , and organizations as well as a great
deal of energy focused on making Fort Collins a destination for bicycle -
oriented travel . The Fort Collins Convention and Visitor ' s Bureau actively
promotes bicycling to regional and national tourists and makes a concerted
effort to attract bicycle - related conferences and events to Fort Collins .
Bike to Work, Work to Live , Live to Bike
Fort Collins should also be promoted as a city in which to relocate or start a
business . Employers and their employees want to live and work in a place
where a bicycling culture is prevalent . They want to live in a city where it is
possible to bike to work , the store , the library , and to school . There is a
growing population of Americans who want to live in a community where they
2008 Bicycle Plan 60 City of Fort Collins
have transportation alternatives with which to enjoy local amenities and
services . Fort Collins lends itself to this type of bicycle culture and promotes
a vibrant lifestyle for both employers and employees .
Local Bike Shops
There are currently 17 bicycle shops in Fort Collins . This demonstrates the
popularity of bicycling in Fort Collins . Bicycle and bicycle - related gear sales
provide substantial sales - tax revenue for Fort Collins .
Local Bicycle - related Manufactures
Fort Collins is home to several businesses that currently produce bicycle
products nationally . One example is Cycle -Tote Bicycle Trailers and Black
Sheep Bikes both of which produce bikes and bike - related items locally in Fort
Collins .
Economic Recommendations
In cooperation , FC Bikes , appropriate city departments , and community
organizations should continue to support and encourage infrastructure
development , bicycle sporting events , recreational biking , and bicycle facilities
such as the velodrome . This does not necessarily mean financial assistance ,
but is intended to encompass support through coordination efforts ,
promotion , and education .
Support and co - promote efforts with local bike shops to get more people on
bicycles . Bike - related encouragement and educational campaigns have a
positive and substantial effect on local bike shops , bike non - profit
organizations , and the City ' s FC Bikes efforts .
Embrace and support the local bicycle culture and use it as a tool to
attract employers , business , and visitors . The bicycle friendly nature of
Fort Collins will complement other quality- of- life characteristics such as
renewable energy efforts , open space , and recreation .
In cooperation , the City of Fort Collins and the Fort Collins bicycling
community should pursue bicycle - related businesses and manufacturers
as well as support existing bicycle - related businesses in Fort Collins .
Environment
The bicycle is a low- cost and effective means of transportation that is quiet ,
non - polluting , extremely energy- efficient , versatile , healthy , and fun . Bicycles
are relatively inexpensive to acquire and maintain , are a good source of
exercise for the health - conscious traveler , and are dependable in all but the
most inclement weather . They are also extremely flexible vehicles that can
2008 Bicycle Plan 61 City of Fort Collins
operate in a wide variety of settings and result in desirable , environmental
benefits .
Riding a bicycle has many positive effects on the environment , both physical
and social , for all residents and visitors in Fort Collins . Every time a person
chooses a bicycle over an automobile , air polluting emissions are minimized .
Every time a person chooses a bicycle for recreational purposes , the visual
image of them riding promotes the City ' s trail system . Every time a person
can make a choice to live near where they work and play so that they can ride
their bicycle daily , City land - use codes are validated . A combination of these
benefits results in an enhanced environment for residents and visitors of Fort
Collins .
Local statistics on bicycling in Fort Collins and its direct impact on the air
quality conditions are prepared annually for the CDOT , in order to comply
with current Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) grant
requirements . Statistical information is based on trip - reduction benefits from
those people that choose the bicycle over the vehicle for transportation .
The extensive trail system in and around the City of Fort Collins is heavily
used . There are 30 miles of hard - surfaced , multi - use paths along with over 30
miles of trails appropriate for all levels of bicyclists . The trails provide direct
access to open space and natural resource areas while encouraging an
environmentally friendly mode of transportation . This not only reduces
pollution but instills a sense of ownership for the quality of our local , natural ,
environment .
City Plan and associated land - use codes encourage residential development
near employment , education , and recreation hubs . Along the proposed
Mason Corridor/ MAX Bus Rapid Transit Project , the City has implemented a
Transit Oriented Development (TOD ) overlay zone . Within the TOD zone ,
mixed - use development , including residential , retail , and office space , will be
the primary use . This type of development minimizes distances people must
travel in a day and promotes the bicycle as a viable transportation option . In
addition , there are no automobile parking requirements in the TOD overlay
zone , discouraging vehicular use and encouraging bicycle use .
Environmental Recommendations
Implementation of all recommendations provided in the attempt to meet the
purpose of the 2008 Bicycle Plan and ultimately increase the use of the bicycle
on a daily basis will improve the overall environment in Fort Collins . One
primary impact will be on air quality as air quality directly benefits from the
reduction of vehicular trips . An improved bicycle network would provide the
opportunity for more bicycle trips and fewer vehicular trips . In addition ,
2008 Bicycle Plan 62 City of Fort Collins
enhanced connectivity for the bicycle with both transit and pedestrian access ,
provides further opportunity for vehicular trip reduction . The following
chapter , Multi - Modal Connectivity , provides an overview of existing conditions
and recommendations for multi - modal linkages .
Specific environmental recommendations include enhanced measurement
methods of environmental benefits . This is complicated as many
environmental benefits are secondary and /or cumulative ; however , it is
recommended that further investigations be done to determine adequate and
accepted practices of analysis and quantification .
Continue efforts to coordinate with other City departments and initiatives
underway , such as Climate Wise and the Climate Action Plan , to quantify the
cost of transportation and the economic and environmental benefits of
alternative modes of travel .
In addition to establishing measurement methods and determining benefits , it
is recommended that FC Bikes provide this information regularly to the public
and decision makers . It would be helpful to be better able to quantify or at
least qualify some environmental benefits of bicycle riding and bicycle facility
improvements .
Community
To a great degree , the bicycle is integrated into all facets of life in Fort Collins .
FC Bikes program has capitalized on this aspect of our community and is
working to build relationships between existing bicycle non - profit
organizations , other City departments , the County , local businesses , the
Convention and Visitors Bureau , Colorado State University , the Downtown
Development Authority , and the Downtown Business Association . Combining
the public , private , and non - profit sectors on bicycle projects enhances the
probability for success while incorporating the multiple facets of the
community . A brief description of these existing relationships and those in
development follows .
■ Local Bicycle Non - profits Organizations - FC Bikes is working on
building the strength , organization , and leadership of our local bicycle
groups . It is FC Bikes intention to assist these groups that contribute to
development of the support system and therefore increase bicycle use .
Local bicycle groups include Bike Fort Collins , a bicycle advocacy based
group ; the Fort Collins Bike Co - op , a grassroots organization dedicated
to assisting financially challenged individuals and children adopt
bicycling as a form of transportation ; and the Fort Collins Cycling Club ,
which provides recreational activities while engaging in community
involvement projects . FC Bikes is assisting these organizations to
2008 Bicycle Plan 63 City of Fort Collins
become self- sustaining while uniting the groups , their interests , and
current and future projects .
■ Other City Departments - FC Bikes works to strengthen and unify
efforts of other City departments . The program is currently developing
projects in conjunction with Police Services , TransFort , the Streets
Department , Traffic Operations and Engineering , Natural Resources ,
Parking , Facilities , Park Planning , and other projects internally within the
Transportation Planning Department
■ Larimer County - Regional bike trail construction and bikeways in and
out of the City is crucial when promoting regional transportation . More
and more people and beginning to bike to Fort Collins from outside the
City limits . Therefore , FC Bikes strives to build and maintain
relationships with County staff.
■ Local Businesses - More and more businesses are becoming bicycle -
friendly . FC Bikes works with local businesses on employer and
employee incentives to foster bicycling as a significant mode of
transportation to work . FC Bikes is also developing projects with local
hotels to lend bicycles to visitors instead of renting vehicles .
■ The Downtown Development Authority ( DDA) and the Beet Street
Program - The DDA and Beet Street program and currently partners
with FC Bikes and the FC Bike Library program . This includes cross
promotion of special events as well as utilization of each other ' s
services to benefit the community as a whole .
■ Convention and Visitor' s Bureau ( CVB ) - FC Bikes has helped the CVB
to identify and adopt bicycling as a legitimate recreational activity and
transportation mode for visitors to Fort Collins . Marketing materials
that capitalize on the " bicycling lifestyle " the Fort Collins offers , such as
a website or brochure made available to visitors , are potential projects .
FC Bikes also works to encourage the CVB to attract bicycle special
events , such as bike races and conferences .
■ Colorado State University - With over 15 , 000 bicyclists , CSU is one of
the most significant bicycling destinations in Fort Collins . FC Bikes
works with CSU at the start of each semester to educate students on
how to ride respectfully and safely in Fort Collins . The Coexist
campaign is designed to educate students on this aspect .
■ Poudre School District ( PSD ) - FC Bikes coordinates with PSD and the
City ' s Safe Routes to School program to assist PSD students , staff,
administration , and families with promoting safe cycling for all ages and
abilities .
UniverCity Connections
Bicycling has been an active topic in the planning and discussion of the
UniverCity Connections Program . UniverCity Connections is a collaboration
between the City of Fort Collins , CSU , DDA , Community Foundation , and other
community stakeholders working together to enhance the campus , downtown ,
and Poudre River areas . Bicycling lies within the Transit and Mobility
2008 Bicycle Plan 64 City of Fort Collins
subcommittee , which has established objectives to improve bicycle
connections between the downtown area , CSU , and the Poudre River . Specific
suggestions include bikeway improvements , East -West connections through
downtown Fort Collins , alleyway connections , as well as overall wayfinding
enhancements .
BIKE
FC Bike Library
For the past year , FC Bikes , Bike Fort Collins , and the Fort Collins Bike Co - op
( local bike advocacy organizations ) have been working toward the
development and implementation of the FC Bike Library . In early 2007 , FC
Bikes and Bike Fort Collins co - authored a Congestion Mitigation Air Quality
( CMAQ) grant to create a bike lending program in Fort Collins . The two -year
grant proposal was approved and the program was launched in April of 2008 .
After months of planning , bicycle fleet and website construction , the FC Bike
Library began lending bicycles and has exceeded expectations in popularity .
After the first season in operation , nearly 250 residents and visitors of Fort
Collins have become bike library members , and nearly 200 bikes have been
checked out .
While the FC Bike Library offers economic benefits from a tourism perspective ,
the community benefits are far more substantial . The major purpose of the FC
Bike Library program is to provide a sensible form of transportation to Fort
Collins residents , while improving air quality and decreasing traffic congestion
in Fort Collins .
Currently , the FC Bike Library is operated on a day to day basis by Bike Fort
Collins . The City of Fort Collins FC Bikes program is the fiscal agent for the
program , and collaborates with Bike Fort Collins and the Fort Collins Bike Co -
op on the program ' s vision and development . Currently , the FC Bike Library
has a fleet of 50 bicycles . By the end of 2009 , the bike library will contain
220 bicycles .
The research of funding opportunities is high a priority to ensure the
sustainability of the FC Bike Library . After 2009 , the initial CMAQ grant
funding will expire . Sponsorships , grants , and City support , will be required to
keep the library rolling on track for years to come .
2008 Bicycle Plan 65 City of Fort Collins
The Recycled Bike Project
Fort Collins has a surplus of bikes within our community . For many years ,
nearly 600 bicycles a year were abandoned in Fort Collins . Police Services
retrieved , documented , and stored these bicycles until they were ready for
auction . The bikes were then trucked to California and auctioned - off online .
FC Bikes recognized these bicycles as a community asset , and worked with
Police Services , the City Attorneys Office , and the Facilities Department to
gain the use of these bicycles and keep them within the City .
The Fort Collins Bike Co - op has been engaged in reconditioning bicycles , then
equipping low- income individuals and families with them . FC Bikes , Bike Fort
Collins , and the Fort Collins Bike Co - op joined forces and was able to relocate
the Fort Collins Bike Co - op into City owned space ( 222 Laporte Rd . ) to operate
the Recycled Bike Project with and impounded bicycles . Their lease is
currently for two years with an option to renew in ,January of 2010 . The Fort
Collins Bike Co - op plays a vital role within the City by taking over the
responsibility of retrieving , documenting , and storing bicycles found and
abandoned throughout Fort Collins . By taking over this responsibility , the
Fort Collins Bike Co - op has freed the City ' s Police Services Department from a
time consuming and arduous task , thus facilitating the establishment of the
FC Bike Library ' s fleet of bicycles . The Fort Collins Bike Co - op builds and
maintains the fleet of FC Bike Library bicycles . They recycle all unusable bike
parts and frames while creating educational programs for all demographics ,
such as the Earn - a - Bike program . Programs like this emulate our City ' s vision
to be environmental stewards while providing a valuable service to the
community .
C.:
No
Y
s
2008 Bicycle Plan 66 City of Fort Collins
Community Recommendations
Explore and pursue the formation of a Bicycle Advisory Committee ( BAC ) to
discuss and plan for the multiple initiatives promoting bicycling in Fort
Collins . A potential BAC could initiate and facilitate the exchange of ideas
from a variety of community groups , demographics , and City departments ,
Boards , and City Council . The development of a BAC would require a thorough
public involvement process with the residents of Fort Collins .
Pursue the Platinum Level designation with the League of American Bicyclists
( LAB ) . This may require a strategic implementation plan to identify and
prioritize bicycle improvements while creating an evaluation or performance
matrix that tracks the progress of individual and overall bicycle improvement
projects within Fort Collins .
Currently , Fort Collins is a Silver Level LAB - designated community and is on
the cusp of gold , " as stated by the League of American Bicyclists ' Bicycle -
Friendly Community manager , Bill Nesper . Although the designation by the
LAB is an important national designation , there are other avenues we can take
as a community to make Fort Collins stand out as an outstanding bicycle -
friendly community . It is as important to promote bicycling on a local level as
it is to promote the nature of our bicycle - friendly community on a national
level . Through the combined efforts of FC Bikes , all Fort Collins bicycle non -
profits , event promoters , the Convention Visitors Bureau , local businesses ,
and the Downtown Development Authority we have already placed Fort Collins
on the national bike map .
Continued Support of Existing and Future Programs
The FC Bike Library , the Recycled Bike Project , and UniverCity Connections has
been created by the community working together to make a difference .
Continued support and efforts in terms of funding and encouragement will
allow these programs to thrive . It is the cross - pollination of these programs
that have led to their immediate successes . These programs and their
missions are interrelated and support one another . Apart from current
programs , it is also crucial to pursue new , innovative community- based
programs as the City of Fort Collins ' bicycle culture evolves .
2008 Bicycle Plan 67 City of Fort Collins
This page intentionally left blank .
i
^ jg �
• . L. III*, foe:
It
°,y , :
• T � �J
�♦ � 1 I
f
'1
` comma _ J
Lip
Ilk
. { I. ♦•Y, ., \ fit {r T. �r ' , 4�
Multi - Modal Connectivity Chapter 9
Enhancing the link between bicycles and transit , bicycles and pedestrians , and
bicycles and automobiles , in combination with end - of-trip facilities , will
improve overall connectivity within Fort Collins .
Improving the link between bicycles and transit is an important component of
making bicycling a convenient , beneficial , and environmentally friendly part of
life in Fort Collins . Linking bicycles with transit helps to overcome such
barriers as lengthy trips , personal security concerns , and riding at night or in
poor weather . This link also enables bicyclists to reach more distant areas
and increase transit ridership . Traditionally , transit users are identified within
approximately %4 mile of a bus stop . Depending on one ' s ability , the bicycle
can extend this distance to well over a mile , thus it is particularly important to
provide linkages between bicycles and transit in those areas with limited
transit access . By encouraging the use of bicycles as access to transit ,
TransFort can increase ridership levels and serve a larger area while
minimizing costs .
The additional integration of bicycles with pedestrians and automobiles
simply magnifies the potential for multi - modal transportation strategies to be
successful . The multiple components of the urban transportation system
have a tremendous ability to complement each other in several ways . A
bicyclist that uses transit and a pedestrian that incorporates bicycling can
easily extend the range of travel without accruing a tremendous increase in
travel time . An automobile driver that combines his trips with bicycling can
still receive all of the benefits of bicycling particularly if the trip was at a
distance that deterred him from bicycling at all . There are many benefits to
the bicyclists and the community when multi - modal transportation choices are
made .
Bicycling and walking are also a great combination . For example , after
bicycling downtown and locking up one ' s bicycle , a resident can walk through
downtown to shop and eat . A bicycle that is equipped with baskets or
panniers allows the bicyclist to carry goods home as well . Recreationally
speaking , a bicyclist may also ride to several of the City' s Natural Areas along
the local trail system , lock their bicycle , and then enjoy a nice walk through
the Natural Area where bicycling is not allowed .
Currently , there are a limited number of people that commute by bicycle into
Fort Collins from Loveland , Windsor , Timnath , Laporte , and Wellington . For
many residents , this distance is too great to commute by bicycle and instead
they will choose vehicular travel . However , the potential is there to
incorporate some programs to encourage multi - modal connectivity that would
2008 Bicycle Plan 69 City of Fort Collins
get residents of those outlying communities to combine bicycle travel with
their automobile travel .
Bike -n - Ride
The Bike - n - Ride program is an effort initiated by Transfort to encourage
bicyclists to ride local City buses . As part of the program , TransFort has
adopted the use of front - mounted , bicycle racks on all transit vehicles . In
2006 , the City received a grant through the Colorado Department of Health
and Environment ' s " Colorado Physical Activity and Nutrition " ( CoPAN )
program . This grant was used to increase the bicycle carrying capacity of
each bus in the TransFort fleet by replacing the older two - bicycle racks with
those that can carry three . Even though all Transfort buses are equipped with
three bike racks , it is often not enough to serve the needs of the community .
In practice , a bicyclist wishing to board a bus with a bicycle waits for a vehicle
to arrive at a stop , loads the bicycle onto the rack , and then boards the
vehicle . Front - mounted bicycle racks incur a minimum amount of increase in
operating and maintenance costs for transit operators and are located close to
the access point of the bus . This design minimizes the increased dwell time
due to the loading and unloading of bicycles . Front mounted bike racks are
safer because the operator of the vehicle is much more aware of a person
loading or unloading a bicycle . Experience reveals that the bicycle can be
loaded or unloaded in less than 15 seconds - even by an inexperienced user .
Bicycle parking at many stops throughout the City is lacking , althoug , newer
stops that have been installed under current development guidelines and
policies have bicycle parking . Older stops often have no bicycle parking .
When the Mason Corridor / MAX BRT system ( a 5 - mile corridor west of College
Avenue ) is fully developed , it is anticipated that bicycles will be allowed on the
buses with the passengers . In addition , bicycle parking will be provided at all
stops and stations .
Multi -Modal Recommendations
Improve bicycle parking at existing transit stops / stations as well as at new
stations to be constructed for the Mason Corridor / MAX BRT system .
Enhance both the Bike Map and the Transfort Map by including information
indicating locations with easy access for bicycle -transit connectivity .
Consider a " Park - n - Ride " concept for bicycle use to encourage regional bicycle
commuters . A " Park n ' Ride " program would motivate regional car commuters
to park their vehicle on the edges or entrances to Fort Collins and then ride
their bicycles into the City . An effort of this nature might decrease traffic
within the City and offer health benefits to daily commuters .
2008 Bicycle Plan 70 City of Fort Collins
Coordinate with businesses to encourage employees to bring bicycles to work
or utilize the FC Bike Library for daily trips near their offices such as meetings
and lunch .
The City should continue to support and pursue programs that foster multi -
modal connectivity between bicycles and transit , bicycles and pedestrians , and
bicycles and automobiles .
End -of-Trip Facilities
Every bicycle trip has two basic components : the route selected by the
bicyclist , and the " end - of- trip " facilities at the destination . These end - of- trip
facilities can include the simple provision of secure and convenient bicycle
parking or more elaborate indoor - parking facilities and /or provision of
showers and changing space . These facilities promote bicycling .
Community surveys of schools and employers indicated that a lack of
adequate end - of- trip facilities serve as barriers for the work/ school - commute
trip . Of those surveyed , many say they would sometimes commute to work or
school by bicycle , or commute more often , if there were showers , lockers , and
secure bicycle storage at work . Clearly , the availability of safe , secure ,
convenient parking is a critical factor for bicycle commuting .
Good , secure bicycle parking offers the following :
■ Increases a building ' s overall parking capacity .
■ Serves those who use bicycles as a mode of transportation .
■ Encourages bicycle use .
Bicyclists ' needs for bicycle parking ranges from easy- to - use bike racks to
storage in a bicycle locker that affords weather and theft protection , gear
storage space , and 24 - hour personal access . A bicyclist ' s needs are defined
by several factors , including the following :
■ The length of trip ( all - day or just minutes ) .
■ Weather conditions .
■ Value of the bicycle .
■ Security of Area as determined by the bicyclist ' s perception . .
Other end - of- trip facilities useful for commuting bicyclists are access to
showers , lockers for personal effects , and /or changing rooms at trip
destinations . For those bicyclists needing to dress more formally , travel
longer distances , or cycle during wet or hot weather , the ability to shower and
change clothing can be as critical as bicycle storage .
Bicycle Parking is the primary way to provide convenience and security for
bicyclists at destinations . Inadequate facilities and fear of theft are major
2008 Bicycle Plan 71 City of Fort Collins
deterrents to bicycle transportation . Bicycles regularly locked to trees and
posts demonstrate that additional bicycle parking is needed at that location .
Effective bicycle parking requires a properly designed rack in an appropriate
location .
There are many types of bicycle racks and lockers available . There are two
general categories of bicycle parking requirements :
■ Short -term - parking is needed where bicycles will be left for short
stops . It requires a high degree of convenience and should be as close
to destinations as possible . At least some short -term bicycle parking
should be protected from the weather .
■ Long -term - parking is needed where bicycles will be left for hours at a
time . It requires a high degree of security , weather protection , and well -
designed racks in covered areas , lockers , storage rooms , or fenced
areas with restricted access offering added security .
Factors to consider when installing bicycle parking are as follows :
■ Visibility - Racks should be highly-visible so bicyclists can spot them
immediately when they arrive from the street . A visible location also
discourages theft and vandalism .
■ Security - Adequate lighting and surveillance is essential for the security
of the bicycles and the users . Bicycle racks and lockers must be well
anchored to the ground to avoid vandalism and theft .
■ Weather Protection - A portion of bicycle parking should be protected
from the weather ( some short-term bicycle parking can be unprotected
since bicycle use tends to increase significantly during fair weather) .
Protection can include an existing overhang or covered walkway , a
special covering , weatherproof outdoor bicycle lockers , or an indoor
storage area .
■ Clearance - Adequate clearance is required around racks to give
bicyclists room to maneuver and to prevent conflicts with pedestrians or
parked cars . Racks should not block access to building entrances or fire
hydrants .
Current State of End -of-Trip Facilities
Bicycle Parking at Community Destinations within Fort Collins
In general terms, bicyclists will always find a bicycle parking option at all community
destinations . Ideally, a choice of long- or short-term alternatives will be at their disposal ;
however, many times, the existing alternatives may not meet bicyclist ' s needs . The application
of development standards with quantity requirements is limited to current development and
redevelopment; therefore, some areas of our community are left with a bicycle parking deficit.
Table 4 summarizes the general availability of bicycle parking at community centers and
destinations .
2008 Bicycle Plan 72 City of Fort Collins
Table 4 . Bicycle Parking at Community Facilities
Destination Does bicycle parking exist?
Libraries Yes , at all locations .
Transit Stations Yes , at all locations .
Transit Stops At most locations .`
Recreation Centers Yes , at all locations .
Government Buildings Yes , at all locations .
Office Buildings At most locations .`
Retail Centers At most locations .`
Public Spaces and Parks Yes , at all locations .
Some existing Transit Stops , Office Buildings , and Retail Centers do not have bicycle parking since
they were approved and constructed subject to older standards . With infill and redevelopment projects
sites and bicycle parking facilities are routinely brought into compliance with current development
standards as adopted with City Plan in 1997 .
Much of the bicycle parking found
in Downtown and Old Town Fort I e
Collins is the result of a vigorous
installation program undertaken by BIKE CAGE
the City in 1992 when 428 U - Near tile
"� ' "II users meet lock
��=a' " —`� � � eS.
The Ci
shaped bike parking racks were are n" and
`e0
are not responsihlele
for loss. Ihelt or
installed . Funding for these racks damage
Far information call
came from a CMA rant . ,l '114m Sere
Throughout Old Town , there are �296617CP5
more than 100 short - term parking b
spaces ( mostly installed on street
sidewalks ) and 28 long -term �V
spaces in the form of a recently
installed bicycle cage . The bicycle
cage project was a joint -venture between Larimer County and the City of Fort
Collins ' Parking Services and is located in the Civic Center Parking Garage .
Downtown And Old Town Area Bicycle Parking
In essence , the condition of the short -term parking supply in Old Town is
inconsistent . It ranges from sufficiently maintained , well located , and heavily-
used frame style racks to neglected , not secure , and rarely used clip - styles
that in many cases discourage use .
Areas of particular concern are :
■ Southern and northern entrances to Old Town Square
■ College Avenue , between Mountain and Laporte Avenues , and
■ Mountain Avenue , between College Avenue and Mason Street .
■ Walnut Street , between College Avenue and Linden St .
2008 Bicycle Plan 73 City of Fort Collins
Bicycle Parking at Colorado State University
Colorado State University has recently purchased hundreds of new , user-
friendly bike racks to accommodate over 15 , 000 bicyclists daily . The growth
of partnerships between the City and CSU ( such as UniverCity) , discussed in
Chapter 7 , has the potential to provide innovative solutions to bicycle parking
and scofflaw issues downtown and on the CSU campus .
Bicycle Parking at Primary, Middle and Secondary Schools
All public schools within Fort Collins have bicycle parking . In most but not all
cases the supply is adequate . The provision of bicycle parking at schools is
ultimately the responsibility of the Poudre School District . The City of Fort
Collins provides advice on safe and effective parking at schools , primarily
through the Safe Routes to School Program .
X
- _ ` + •ray � �r= � {. — • - (
One factor that makes it difficult to assess what level of bicycle parking
should be provided at schools is the " school of choice " policy in the Poudre
School District . A neighborhood school is open to students from all around
the community . The reality of this policy , with regard to bicycling , is that it
can result in student attendees who live more than a reasonable bicycling
distance from their school so that potential ridership is decreased .
End-of Trip Facility Recommendations
Encourage the development of long - and short -term parking strategies
throughout the community . Schools and significant community destinations
( Old Town , Foothills Mall ) should always have an ample supply of secure ,
high - quality , bicycle parking .
Explore ways through which it can encourage the development of indoor ,
long - term , bicycle parking facilities with new public and private development .
Areas of focus should include transit stops and stations , community facilities ,
public and private parking structures , and major employment and commercial
centers .
2008 Bicycle Plan 74 City of Fort Collins
Pursue avenues through which a greater supply of bicycle parking can
be implemented at all locations throughout the community .
Downtown Bicycle Parking Recommendations
There is a shortage of short -term parking at certain locations in Old Town .
Several businesses , in conjunction with FC Bikes , have begun to explore the
option of using vehicular parking stalls as short -term bicycle parking . The use
of removable , bicycle parking racks would enable a dramatic increase in
parking supply for limited hours when bicycle - parking demand is highest -
typically weekend evenings and during special events . Close coordination and
cooperation should continue with local businesses to encourage innovative
parking solutions in the downtown area .
2008 Bicycle Plan 75 City of Fort Collins
This page intentionally left blank .
r
�%
. � i
r
�T _ s
;i Y � '�.
_ _
� ; -
��,
� • • • , E�
��`
�►-
� � � � �.
. �
, " I
� �
Conclusions Chapter 10
The 2008 Bicycle Plan assesses and proposes improvements to nearly
every facet of bicycling in Fort Collins . The goals , principles and policies
that pertain to bicycling established in City Plan and the Transportation
Master Plan have set the foundation for the current policies , projects , and
programs as well as the focus for the numerous recommendations
provided .
Engineering Recommendations
The importance of expanding and improving the bikeway network are
identified throughout the 2008 Bicycle Plan , with the engineering
recommendations summarized below :
■ Continued implementation of projects identified on Hot List I .
■ Pursue implementation of projects identified on Hot List II .
■ Identify and implement interim solutions
■ Continued the implementation of the Transportation Master
Plan and the Master Street Plan .
■ Continue and improve maintenance of Priority Commuter
Routes .
■ Improve signal detection loops .
■ Examine innovative bicycle traffic solutions such as bike
boxes and bike boulevards .
Education and Encouragement Recommendations
Education and Encouragement are imperative for the City of Fort Collins
to excel at being a nationwide leader in bicycle - friendly communities . In
summary , as a step toward that goal , the 2008 Bicycle Plan recommends
the following :
■ Maintain existing education and encouragement programs and
solicit more participation .
■ Continue to develop and implement innovative education and
encouragement programs , campaigns , and events .
■ Continue to foster relationships between non - profits ,
advocacy , and community groups and build public - private
partnerships .
■ Consider the implementation of Cyclovias ( car- free events ) .
■ Improve wayfinding methods for bicyclists .
■ Reinforce yield and safety education programs pertaining to
bicyclists and other bike lane and trail users .
Enforcement Recommendations
It is recognized in the 2008 Bicycle Plan that enforcement is a very
important part of the holistic strategy of providing facilities , educating
people on how to use them , and providing an environment in which they
2008 Bicycle Plan 77 City of Fort Collins
want to use them . Therefore , it is recommended that the following
actions be initiated :
■ Work closely with local enforcement agencies to create
innovative , proactive , educational campaigns .
■ Bridge the gap of understanding between bicyclists and local
enforcement agencies by providing current and consistent
information .
■ Coordinate training sessions to ensure knowledge on current
local , regional , and national bicycle policies and ordinances .
■ Establish enforcement techniques for handling special events
and protests .
■ Explore the creation of a Share the Road Safety Class .
■ Establish " sting " operations with local enforcement agencies
to address bicycle theft and traffic - law evasion by bicyclists .
Economic Recommendations
Economic development opportunities related to the increased bicycle use
are highlighted in the 2008 Bicycle Plan . In an attempt to realize those
opportunities , the following actions are recommended :
■ Continue to support and encourage infrastructure
development , bicycle sporting events , recreational biking ,
and bicycle facilities .
■ Use the local bicycle culture to attract employers , new
residents , businesses , and visitors .
■ Encourage bicycle - related businesses and manufacturers .
Environmental Recommendations
Environmental benefits are the result of implementing all of the
recommendations included in the 2008 Bicycle Plan ; however , specific
environmental recommendations include the following :
■ Establish measurement methods for environmental benefits .
■ Coordinate with other City initiatives to measure environmental
benefits .
Community Recommendations
Community support and partnerships have achieved significant growth
over the past 13 years ; however , below are additional recommendations
to ensure sustainability and expansion of those relationships :
■ Pursue the formation of a Bicycle Advisory Committee ( BAC ) .
■ Pursue the Platinum Level designation with the League of American
Bicyclists ( LAB) .
■ Establish performance measures for bicycle programs and facilities .
■ Maintain support for existing programs .
2008 Bicycle Plan 78 City of Fort Collins
■ Foster communication among the public , non - profit , and
private sector to implement the recommendations in the
2008 Bicycle Plan .
Multi - Modal Recommendations
Bicycles have a tremendous potential to enhance multi - modal connectivity
for the citizen of Fort Collins ; therefore , the following is recommended :
■ Expand opportunities for bicycle - transit/ bicycle - pedestrian / bicycle -
car auto linkage .
■ Incorporate bicycle parking at transit stops and stations .
■ Improve and expand bicycle parking throughout the City .
■ Encourage installation of showers and changing facilities .
In conclusion , the recommendations included in the 2008 Bicycle Plan are
intended as a guide for continuing to develop and support a healthy
bicycling community with implementation targeted within a 5 -year time -
frame . However , a good bike plan must be fluid and dynamic and should
respond to the growing and changing needs of the local bicycling
community . As new ideas are developed and old methods become
outdated , the 2008 Bicycle Plan must respond to , then emulate the
expectations of the residents of and visitors to Fort Collins .
Enjoy the Ride !
2008 Bicycle Plan 79 City of Fort Collins
Appendix A
Relevant Sections of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards and
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual
CHAPTER 17 — BICYCLE FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title Page
17 . 1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 -1
17. 1 . 1 AASHTO Basis........................................................................................................................... 17-1
17. 1 .2 Bicycle Master Plan ................................................................................................................... 17-1
17. 1 .3 Permitted Bicycle Travel Areas ................................................................................................ 174
17. 1 .4 Requirement for Other Accesses .............................................................................................. 17-1
17. 1 .5 ADA Requirements.................................................................................................................... 17-1
17. 1 .6 Use of Drainage System and Open Space ................................................................................ 17-1
17. 1 .7 Access Easements ....................................................................................................................... 174
17. 1 .8 Maintenance Responsibility ...................................................................................................... 17-2
17. 1 .9 Appurtenances Not Allowed ..................................................................................................... 17-2
17 .2 On -Street Bike Lanes Design Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-2
17.2. 1 On-Street Bike Routes ............................................................................................................... 17-2
17.2.2 Width and Cross Sections ......................................................................................................... 17-2
17.2.3 Signage and Striping.................................................................................................................. 17-2
17.2.4 Actuation Loop........................................................................................................................... 17-2
17.2.5 Rural Roads................................................................................................................................ 17-2
17.2.6 Bike Lanes at Intersections ....................................................................................................... 17-3
17 . 3 Off-Street Bicycle Paths Design Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-3
17.3. 1 Bike Path Location .................................................................................................................... 17-3
A. Location Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-3
B . Easements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-3
17.3.2 Trees, Vegetation, and Other Obstacles......
A. Preserving Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-3
B . Distance from Obstacles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-3
C . Clearing of Vegetation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-3
D. Overhead Clearance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-3
17.3.3 Cross Section .............................................................................................................................. 17-3
17.3.4 Grade .......................................................................................................................................... 17-4
A. Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-4
B . Minimum and Maximum Grade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-4
17.3.5 Design Speed .............................................................................................................................. 17-4
A. Paved Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-4
B . Unpaved Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-4
17.3.6 Horizontal Alignment ................................................................................................................ 174
A. Minimum Radius of Curvature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-4
B . Formula for Radius Calculation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-4
C . Rate of Superelevation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-5
D. Coefficient of Friction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-5
E. Coefficient of Friction Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-5
F. Minimum Radius . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-5
G. Substandard Radius Curves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-5
17.3.7 Sight Distance ............................................................................................................................. 17-5
17.3.8 Cross Slope ................................................................................................................................. 17-5
17.3.9 Drainage ..................................................................................................................................... 17-5
A. Requirements and Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-5
B . Ditch Placement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-6
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1 , 2007 Page 174
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland , City of Fort Collins
17.3. 10 Safety Considerations................................................................................................................ 17-6
A. Consideration of Pedestrians . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-6
B . Clearance Between a Bike Path and a Street . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-6
C . Barriers and Other Safety Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-6
D. Signs for Hazards and Regulatory Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-6
E . Intersection Grade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-6
F. Access Ramps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-6
17.3. 11 Bicycle Path Bridges.................................................................................................................. 17-7
A. Crossings of Water Courses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-7
B . Pedestrian Crossings on Major Collectors and Arterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-7
C . Railings, Fences, or Barriers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-7
D. Bridge Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-7
E . Bridge Underpass Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-7
17.3. 12 Bicycle Path Underpasses ......................................................................................................... 17-7
17.3. 13 Signage and Pavement Marking .............................................................................................. 17-7
A. Basic Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-7
B . Painted Centerline on Curves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-7
17.3. 14 Lighting ...................................................................................................................................... 17-8
17.3. 15 Intersections ............................................................................................................................... 17-8
A. Curb Ramps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-8
B . Sight Distance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-8
C . Turning Radius at Intersections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-8
17A Bicycle Parking Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 -8
17.4. 1 Bicycle Parking Area Requirement ......................................................................................... 174
A. U Type Bike Rack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-8
B . Bike Parking Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-8
17.4.2 Placement of Bike Racks........................................................................................................... 17-8
LIST OF TABLES
This Chapter Does Not Contain Tables
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 17- 1 Bike Path Clearance
Figure 17-2 Minimum Stopping Sight Distances
Figure 17-3 Minimum Length of Vertical Curves
Figure 17-4 Minimum Lateral Clearances on Horizontal Curves
Page 17-ii Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1 , 2007
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland , City of Fort Collins
Chapter 17 — Bicycle Facilities Design and Technical Criteria
Section 17 . 1 General
CHAPTER 17 - BICYCLE FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL
CRITERIA
17 . 1 GENERAL
This chapter sets forth the minimum criteria to be used in the design of all bike lanes, bike paths,
or other bicycles facilities within the Local Entity' s rights-of-way or easements .
17 . 1 . 1 AASHTO Basis
In this chapter, the AASHTO "Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities" as
published by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
was used as a reference .
17 . 1 .2 Bicycle Master Plan
This subsection was developed based on the Master Plans for each Local Entity. All
projects shall optimize bicycle travel within the GMA by providing bicycle facilities in
all new developments in accordance with the Local Entity' s Master Plan.
17 . 1 . 3 Permitted Bicycle Travel Areas
On public streets, bicycle travel should use designated bike lanes whenever possible.
Bicyclists may share vehicular travel lanes in cases where no designated bike lanes are
provided, except in certain cases where bicycle travel may be prohibited.
17 . 1 .4 Requirement for Other Accesses
Off-site improvements may be required to provide citizens with access to schools, and
local commercial and other community facilities.
17 . 1 . 5 ADA Requirements
All designs for off-street bicycle paths are considered multi-use paths and shall conform
to ADA requirements.
17 . 1 . 6 Use of Drainage System and Open Space
The bike path and pathway system may use the drainage and open space system in
accordance with the Local Entity ' s utility standards .
17 . 1 . 7 Access Easements
Where bike paths cross private land or coincide with private access facilities, the
Developer shall provide a public access easement. This will ensure that bike paths or
other access facilities become part of the overall Local Entity bike path plan.
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1 , 2007 Page 17- 1
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland , City of Fort Collins
Chapter 17 — Bicycle Facilities Design and Technical Criteria
Section 17 . 2 On -Street Bike Lanes Design Requirements
17 . 1 . 8 Maintenance Responsibility
Maintenance and operation responsibility for new bike paths will be determined during
the site/subdivision plan approval process . Public accessibike path easements shall be
conveyed to the Local Entity. The easement width shall be clearly indicated on the site
plan or construction plans .
17 . 1 . 9 Appurtenances Not Allowed
Manholes, utility poles or other appurtenances or obstructions, should not be located in
bike lanes or bike paths .
17 . 2 ON -STREET BIKE LANES DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
17 . 2 . 1 On -Street Bike Routes
Specific streets are designated in the Master Plans as on-street bicycle routes . These
routes are on streets with lower traffic volumes and speeds, wide outside lanes, and
minimal stop signs, stop lights, curb cuts, driveways, and interference with turning
traffic . Streets designated as on-street bicycle routes shall be designed with additional
width for bike lanes . Some streets within new developments or re-developments must
also contain additional roadway width for bike lanes, in accordance with Figures 7-1F
through 743F and 74L through 741L.
17 . 2 . 2 Width and Cross Sections
The bike lane shall be designed with widths shown in standard street classification
sections . Bicycle lanes on one-way streets shall be on the right side of the street, unless
otherwise specified by the Local Entity. Refer to Chapter 7, Street Design and
Technical Criteria, for the standard cross section requirements . Bike lane width shall not
be less than 5 feet.
17 . 2 . 3 Signage and Striping
All designated bike lanes shall be signed and striped, as required by MUTCD and as
required in Chapter 14, Traffic Control Devices .
17 . 2 . 4 Actuation Loop
Separate actuation loops are required in bike lanes at signalized intersections . Quadra
pole-type loops are required. Loop installation shall be similar to that in Sections 22.5.8
C5 and 22 .5.9, E6, HBP-Superpave and HBP — Marshall Method .
17 . 2 . 5 Rural Roads
In rural road sections, the paved roads shall include not less than a 5 -foot paved shoulder,
and not less than a 6-foot paved shoulder in Fort Collins (city limits only), for bicycle
travel.
Page 17-2 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1 , 2007
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland , City of Fort Collins
Chapter 17 — Bicycle Facilities Design and Technical Criteria
Section 17 . 3 Off-Street Bicycle Paths Design Requirements
17 . 2 . 6 Bike Lanes at Intersections
At the intersections where a separate right turn lane exists and is striped, the bicycle lane
shall transition and be placed between the through lane and the right turn lane. The bike
lane width shall remain the same as the approaching bike lane.
17 . 3 OFF -STREET BICYCLE PATHS DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
The Applicant should refer to the Local Entity ' s parks and recreation department for the
recreation trail design requirements.
17 . 3 . 1 Bike Path Location
A. Location Criteria
Bike path locations shall be based on safety, circulation, and access considerations .
B. Easements
Where needed, a 10 to 20-foot minimum easement width shall be procured for a 10-
foot wide bike path, in accordance with Figure 7-14.
17 . 3 . 2 Trees , Vegetation , and Other Obstacles
A. Preserving Trees
Where possible, bike paths shall be routed to minimize the loss of trees and disruption
of natural environmental conditions .
B. Distance from Obstacles
A minimum of 2 feet is required between the bike path edge and any vertical
obstructions such as trees, utility poles, signs, fences, or other obstacles . Greater
separation may be required by the Local Entity where grades exceed 4 percent.
C. Clearing of Vegetation
Regardless of bike path surface, all vegetative material within 4 feet of the bike path
shall be removed prior to bike path construction. This requirement shall be specified
by the Designer and included on the approved plans. See Figure 17- 1 .
D. Overhead Clearance
All bike paths shall have a minimum of 10 feet clear vertical distance above the path.
See Figure 17-1 .
17 . 3 . 3 Cross Section
Typical cross-sections shall be provided for all critical points (i . e. change in grade,
direction) along the length of the bike path. See Figure 174
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1 , 2007 Page 17-3
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland , City of Fort Collins
Chapter 17 — Bicycle Facilities Design and Technical Criteria
Section 17 . 3 Off-Street Bicycle Paths Design Requirements
17 . 3 . 4 Grade
A. Profile
A profile of the proposed bike path construction shall be included in the construction
plans or site plan. If the bike path profile is not consistent with the roadway profile,
provide a separate profile for the bike path.
B. Minimum and Maximum Grade
Minimum grade shall be 0 . 60 percent except in sag curves where proper drainage is
provided by cross slope. The minimum grade shall be waived if cross slope is 2
percent and good drainage is provided off the side and is unobstructed. Maximum
grade shall be 5 percent or as allowed by ADA.
17 . 3 . 5 Design Speed
A. Paved Surfaces
For paved surfaces a minimum design speed of 20 mph shall be used. Where grades
exceed 4 percent, a design speed of 30 mph shall be used.
B. Unpaved Surfaces
For unpaved surfaces, a minimum design speed of 10 mph shall be used. Where
grades exceed 4 percent, a design speed of 20 mph shall be used.
17 . 3 . E Horizontal Alignment
A. Minimum Radius of Curvature
The minimum radius of curvature negotiable by a bicycle is a function of the
superelevation rate of the bicycle path surface, the coefficient of friction between the
bicycle tires and the bicycle path surface, and the speed of the bicycle .
B. Formula for Radius Calculation
The minimum design radius of curvature shall be based upon the following formula:
V2
R=
15 (e+f)
where :
R = Minimum radius of curvature (ft)
V = Design speed (mph)
e = Rate of superelevation
f = Coefficient of friction
Page 17-4 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1 , 2007
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland , City of Fort Collins
Chapter 17 — Bicycle Facilities Design and Technical Criteria
Section 17 . 3 Off-Street Bicycle Paths Design Requirements
C. Rate of Superelevation
Bicycle path superelevation rate shall be a minimum of 2 percent (the minimum
necessary to encourage adequate drainage) and a maximum of 3 percent.
D. Coefficient of Friction
The coefficient of friction depends upon speed, surface type, roughness, and
condition; tire type and condition; and whether the surface is wet or dry. Friction
factors used for design should be selected based upon the point at which centrifugal
force causes the bicyclist to recognize a feeling of discomfort and instinctively act to
avoid higher speed.
E. Coefficient of Friction Values
Extrapolating values used in highway design, design friction factors for paved bicycle
paths can be assumed to vary from 0 .27 at 20 mph to 0 . 22 at 30 mph. Unpaved
surface friction factors are to be reduced by 50 percent to allow a sufficient margin of
safety.
F. Minimum Radius
Based upon a superelevation rate (e) of 2 percent, the minimum radius of curvature to
be used is 95 feet for 20 mph.
G. Substandard Radius Curves
When substandard radius curves must be used on bicycle paths because of Right-of-
Way, topographical, or other considerations, standard curve warning signs and
supplemental pavement markings shall be installed in accordance with the MUTCD .
The negative effects of substandard curves can also be partially offset by widening
the pavement through curves .
17 . 3 . 7 Sight Distance
Refer to Figures 17-2 through 17-4 and Chapter 7, Street Design and Technical Criteria,
for sight distance requirements .
17 . 3 . 8 Cross Slope
The cross slope shall be 2 percent.
17 . 3 . 9 Drainage
A. Requirements and Standards
All bike path designs shall satisfy the storm drainage requirements of the Local
Entity ' s utilities department. Bike paths located within state Right-of-Way shall meet
CDOT standards .
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1 , 2007 Page 17-5
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland , City of Fort Collins
Chapter 17 — Bicycle Facilities Design and Technical Criteria
Section 17 . 3 Off-Street Bicycle Paths Design Requirements
B. Ditch Placement
Where a bike path is cut into a hillside, a ditch shall be placed along the high side of
the bike path to prevent sheet flow across it.
17 . 3 . 10 Safety Considerations
A. Consideration of Pedestrians
The safety of pedestrians, and others who may use or travel on a bike path, shall be a
prime consideration in the bike path design.
B. Clearance Between a Bike Path and a Street
A utility easement, as required in Chapter 12, Utility Locations, is required between
the edge of the bike path and the back edge of curb and gutter. No bike path shall be
constructed directly adjacent to street curb or street pavement. Minimum separation
shall be 6 feet.
The Local Entity Engineer may require a larger distance of separation when it is
feasible and would improve safety.
C. Barriers and Other Safety Devices
For bike paths adjacent to streets with speed limits over 25 mph, and with slopes
greater than 6 percent, the Local Entity Engineer may require special safety measures .
Examples include barriers or other safety devices between the roadway and bike path,
or an increase in the distance between the bike path and highway.
D. Signs for Hazards and Regulatory Messages
Standard signing and pavement markings in the MUTCD shall be specified in the
design of the bike path to alert bike path users to hazards and to convey regulatory
messages .
E. Intersection Grade
Maximum grade of the bike path at intersections is 3 percent extending for 30 feet in
each direction from the centerline of the intersection.
F. Access Ramps
Standard access ramps will be provided at all bike path curb crossings to allow
continuity of bike path use by bicyclists and pedestrians . Curb depressions equaling
the bike path width shall be used, with the bike path surface sloping to the pavement
at 1 : 12 maximum slope .
Page 17-6 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1 , 2007
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland , City of Fort Collins
Chapter 17 — Bicycle Facilities Design and Technical Criteria
Section 17 . 3 Off-Street Bicycle Paths Design Requirements
17 . 3 . 11 Bicycle Path Bridges
A. Crossings of Water Courses
All bike paths require either a bridge or a fair weather crossing. See Chapter 11 ,
Structures, for design requirements for bridges .
B. Pedestrian Crossings on Major Collectors and Arterials
On all Local Entity major Collectors and Arterials, wherever desirable, underpass or
overpass (grade separated) pedestrian crossings shall be provided for
regional/neighborhood bike paths . These pedestrian crossings must be coordinated
with the Local Entity Engineer or the Local Entity' s appropriate department.
C. Railings, Fences, or Barriers
Railings, fences, or barriers on both sides of a bicycle path structure shall be a
minimum of 4 . 5 feet high. Smooth rub rails should be attached to the barriers at
handlebar height of 3 . 5 feet. Barriers should not impede storm water runoff from the
path.
D. Bridge Requirements
See Chapter 11 , Structures .
E. Bridge Underpass Lighting
All bike path bridge underpasses shall have lighting in accordance with Chapter 15,
Street Lighting.
17 . 3 . 12 Bicycle Path Underpasses
The minimum clearances for underpasses are as follows :
Horizontal : 10 feet from abutment to curb or edge of water, 12 feet if
equestrian accommodation is required.
Vertical : 10 feet from trail surface to underside of bridge, 12 feet if
equestrian accommodation is required.
The trail surface elevation shall be at or above the high water mark for the 10 year storm.
17 . 3 . 13 Signage and Pavement Marking
A. Basic Requirements
All signs, except locally adopted bike route signs, shall conform to MUTCD.
B. Painted Centerline on Curves
All curves with restricted sight distances are required to be painted with a centerline
to separate traffic. The centerline shall be 4 inches in width and painted yellow.
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1 , 2007 Page 17- 7
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland , City of Fort Collins
Chapter 17 — Bicycle Facilities Design and Technical Criteria
Section 17 . 4 Bicycle Parking Areas
17 . 3 . 14 Lighting
See Chapter 15 , Street Lighting.
17 . 3 . 15 Intersections
The following requirements apply to all bike path intersections with either streets or other
bike paths :
A. Curb Ramps
Curb ramps the same width as the bike path shall be provided at each intersection.
B. Sight Distance
Sight distance requirements shall be in conformance with AASHTO requirements .
The Designer shall ensure sufficient stopping and intersection sight distance at all
bike path intersections and curves, particularly where steep grades are proposed at
bike path/ roadway intersections . Obstructions to the visibility of motorists or bike
path users shall be removed or the bike path aligned around the obstruction to
maximize visibility.
C. Turning Radius at Intersections
The minimum turning radius at bike path intersections shall be 20 feet.
17 .4 BICYCLE PARKING AREAS
17 .4 . 1 Bicycle Parking Area Requirement
A. U Type Bike Rack
The inverted U type bike rack is required for all bicycle parking racks . See
Construction Drawings 1701 through 1707.
B. Bike Parking Spaces
For proposed nonresidential land uses, bicycle parking shall be equivalent to 5
percent of the off-street vehicle parking requirement with a minimum of 2 spaces .
Each inverted U rack provided will count as two bicycle parking spaces .
17 .4 .2 Placement of Bike Racks
Racks shall be within 30 feet of building entrances. All bicycle parking provided shall be
on concrete, and located a minimum distance as follows from any wall :
Bike Orientation Min. Distance of Rack from Wall
Parallel to wall 24 inches
Perpendicular to wall 30 inches
Covered parking is encouraged where possible.
Page 17-8 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1 , 2007
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland , City of Fort Collins
1 � (:7
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cleared Area i
I I
I maco ro- I
c ) i
I CO t I
I o L I
ro
I e co I
I c p Q) I
a) o LU
Ib
oC I
pN
Surface material as I J
I/ I� approved by Local
Entity Engineer.
1 III Road Base
Undisturbed
4'-0" 8' or 10' 4'-0" Ground
20' Easement (min . )
Shoulder Shoulder
Area Area
BIKE PATH CLEARING
NOTES :
1 . Clear trail and shoulder areas of all vegetative matter and debris .
2 . For bike paths 10 feet or greater in width , 4 feet in width more than the bike path shall be cleared .
3 . 8' width (min . ) for one way traffic , 10' width (min . ) for two way traffic .
BIKE PATH
LARIMER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO . FIGURE
URBAN AREA FIGURE
STREET STANDARDS DATE . 08/07/00 17 - 1
20
Q r
0 15
( \ 2
10 � U1
rR� � O O
V
5 3
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Minimum Stopping Distance - Ft .
V2
S = + 3 . 67 v
30(f± G)
Where: S = Minimum Sight Distance, Ft. Descend (-G)
V = Velocity, mph Ascend (+ G)
f = Coefficient of Friction (use 0 . 25)
G = Grade Ft./Ft. (rise/run)
(Metric Conversion : 1 FT. = 0 . 3 m . 1 mph = 1 . 6 km/h)
From AASHTO
MINIMUM STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCES
L
MER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO : FIGURERBAN AREA FIGURE
ET STANDARDS DATE : 08 / 07/ 00 1 '7 - 2
LL
J 500
i
i
4 /
i
400 r
J
U300
200 INN
100
h
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Algebraic Difference in Grade (A)
200(h1 +h2) 2
L - 25 - When S > L
A
AS2
L = When S < L
100(�h1+�h2) 2
L (min .) = 2V
Where : S = Stopping Sight Distance (ft . )
A = Algebraic Difference in Grade
h1= Eye Height of Bicyclist (4 . 5 Feet)
hr Height of Object (0 Feet)
L = Minimum Vertical Curve Length (ft. )
From AASHTO
MINIMUM LENGTH OF VERTICAL CURVES
LARIMER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO . FIGURE
URBAN AREA FIGURE
STREET STANDARDS DATE : 08/07 /00 17 - 3
e
a�
c
o Q,
U
L
U) !(�O
'J
O Q.��fp0
Q O
U
ca
ro
L
aN
co
J
Sight Distance (S) - Feet
(Metric Conversion : 1 FT . - 0 . 3 m .)
* Lateral clearances on horizontal curves should be calculated based on the
sum of the stopping sight distances for bicyclists traveling in opposite
directions around the curve . See text for additional discussion .
Sight Distance (S) measured along this line S = Sight distance in feet.
R = Radius of q inside lane in feet.
m = Distance from q inside lane in feet.
inside lane v = Design speed for 5 in mph .
Angle is expressed in degrees
Eye Line f Si ht Object
,4 ( 28 . 655 ) ]
= R vors R
Obstruction or m
Cutback
R [CoSi
(/ R-m
S = 28 . 65 R )]
Line of sight is 2 . 0' above Q_ inside Formula applies only when S is
lane at point of obstruction . equal to or less than length of curve .
From AASHTO
MINIMUM LATERAL CLEARANCES ON HORIZONTAL CURVES
LSTRE
MER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO , FIGURE
RBAN AREA FIGURE
ET STANDARDS DATE : 08/07 /00 17 - 4
FORT COLLINS ONLY
141 ' ROW (min .)
10, 10'
Pkwy. 107' Roadway Pkwy 10'
(min .) (min .) Min . Fence
15
12' 12' �� Setback
151
12' Travel 12' 12' Travel 12'
Util . Util .
Esmt. 7' 8' Travel Travel Travel Travel 8' 7' Esmt.
Walk Bike Bike Walk
(min.) Lane Lane (min .)
19,
Median
7' 12'
Median Left
Turn
Lane
LEFT TURN MEDIAN
ROADWAY WIDTH : 107'
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 141 ' (min .)
TRAVEL LANES : Six lanes, 12' wide
LEFT TURN LANE: 12' wide
BIKE LANES : Two lanes, 8' wide
PARKING : None .
PARKWAY: 10' (min .) wide . Additional width optional .
SIDEWALK: 7 (min .) wide . Additional width may be required for higher pedestrian traffic within
and leading to activity centers.
MEDIAN : Center Median : 19' wide landscaped ; Left Turn Median : 7' wide landscaped . Barrier curb or out-fall curb and gutter.
WHERE USED : These specifications shall apply as required by the Local Entity when a 6- lane arterial street is shown
on the Master Street Plan , or when the traffic volume on the street is anticipated to be greater than 35 ,000 vpd .
DESIGN SPEED : 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 40-45 MPH
ACCESS : Access will be limited . Points of access must be approved by the Local Entity.
CONTINUITY: Unlimited
FENCES : Fences shall be setback a minimum of 10' from the parkway edge of the sidewalk.
LANDSCAPING : See Appendix "C"
CURB AND GUTTER : Vertical curb and gutter.
6 - LANE ARTERIAL STREET
LARIMER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO : FIGURE
URBAN AREA FIGURE
STREET STANDARDS DATE : 09/ 11 /00 '7 - 1F
FORT COLLINS ONLY
115' ROW (min .)
61 10
83 1 0'
' Roadwa
WalkPkwy Pklvny. 8 in . Fence
min . ( ) (r -=-. .;). Setback
12' 12' �
15 Y Travel 12' 12' Travel 15
Util . 8' 6' Estmt.
Travel Travel 8
Bike Bike Walk
I Lane Lane (min .)
Center
Median
7' 121
Median Left
Turn
Lane
LEFT TURN MEDIAN
ROADWAY WIDTH : 83'
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 11 5' (min .) plus 30' (min .) utility easement.
TRAVEL LANES : 4 lanes, 12' wide
LEFT TURN LANE : 12' wide
BIKE LANES : 2 lanes, 8' wide
PARKING : None.
PARKWAY: 10' (min .) width . Additional width optional .
SIDEWALK: 6' (min .) width . Additional width may be required for higher pedestrian traffic in and leading to
activity areas.
MEDIAN : Center Median : 19' wide landscaped ; Left Turn Median : 7' wide landscaped . Barrier curb or out-fall curb and gutter.
WHERE USED : These specifications shall apply as required by the Local Entity when a 4-lane arterial street is shown
on the Master Street Plan , or when the traffic volume on the street is anticipated to be 15 , 000 to 35 , 000 vpd .
DESIGN SPEED : 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 35-45 MPH
ACCESS : Access will be limited . Points of access must be approved by the Local Entity.
CONTINUITY: Unlimited
FENCES : Fences shall be setback a minimum of 8' from the parkway edge of the sidewalk.
LANDSCAPING : See Appendix "C"
CURB AND GUTTER : Vertical curb and gutter.
4 - LANE ARTERIAL STREET
LUSTRE'ET
MER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO . FIGURE
R
BAN AREA FIGURE
E STANDARDS DATE : 09 / 11 / 00 7 - 2F
FORT COLLINS ONLY
84' ROW (min .)
10' 10'
Pkwy. 52' Roadway Pkwy
Wal (min .) (min .) 81
Min . Fence
min . Setback
151
`
Util . _ 15'
Esmt. Util .
12' 12' 12 Esmt.
8 Travel Center Travel 8' 6
Bike Bike Wal
Lane Lane min .)
ROADWAY WIDTH : 52'
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 84 (min .) plus 30' (min .) utility easement.
TRAVEL LANES : Two lanes, 12' wide.
LEFT TURN LANES : 12' wide at intersections where needed .
BIKE LANES : Two lanes, 8' wide.
PARKING : None
PARKWAY: 10' (min .) width . Additional width optional .
SIDEWALK: 6' (min .) wide . Additional width may be required for higher pedestrian
traffic in and leading to activity areas.
MEDIAN : Not required , except where necessary to control access and/or to provide pedestrian refuge or where Developer
requested medians are approved by the local entity. Additional roadway and right of way width may be required .
WHERE USED : These specifications shall apply as required by the Local Entity when a Collector street is shown
on the Master Street Plan or when the traffic volume on the street is anticipated to be 3 ,500 to 15 , 000 vpd .
DESIGN SPEED : 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 30 - 45 MPH
ACCESS : Access will be limited . Points of access must be approved by the Local Entity.
CONTINUITY: Unlimited
FENCES : Fences shall be setback a minimum of 8' from the parkway edge of the sidewalk.
CURB AND GUTTER : Vertical .
2 - LANE ARTERIAL STREET
LARIMER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO . FIGURE
URB
AN AREA FIGURE ESTREET STANDARDS DATE : 09/ 11 / 00 7 - 3F
FORT COLLINS ONLY
66' ROW (min .)
5' 8' 8'
Pkwy. 40' Roadway Pkwy. 7'
Walk ( ) (min ) Min . Fence
9 (min ) , . : Setback
Util . 9'
Esmt. _ Util .
12' 12' Esmt.
81 Travel Travel 8
Bike Bike Walk
Lane Lane (min.)
8' 121 8'
Bike 11 Left 11 Bike
Lan Travel Turn Travel Lan
50' Roadway
76' ROW (min .)
INTERSECTIONS
(WHERE NEEDED)
ROADWAY WIDTH : 40' (Widen to 50' where a left turn lane is required) .
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 66' (min .) (Widen to 76' where a left turn lane is required .)
TRAVEL LANES : Two lanes, 12' wide or 11 ' wide where a left turn lane is required .
LEFT TURN LANES : 12' wide at intersection where needed .
BIKE LANES : Two lanes, 8' wide .
PARKING : None . Parking must be provided off street for any development adjoining the street.
PARKWAY: 8' (min . ) width . Additional width optional .
SIDEWALK: 5' (min .) width . Additional width may be required for higher pedestrian traffic within
and leading to activity areas.
MEDIAN : Not required , except where necessary to control access and/or to provide pedestrian refuge
or when requested by the Developer and approved by the Local Entity. Additional roadway and right
of way width may be required .
WHERE USED : These specifications shall apply as required by the Local Entity, when a Collector street is shown
on the Master Street Plan or when the traffic volume on the street is anticipated to be in the
range of 3, 500 to 5 ,000 vehicles per day.
DESIGN SPEED : 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 30-35 MPH
ACCESS : Access will be limited . Points of access must be approved by the Local Entity.
CONTINUITY: The street shall be continuous for no more than 1320 feet.
FENCES : Fences shall be setback a minimum of 7 from the parkway edge of the sidewalk.
CURB AND GUTTER : Vertical curb and gutter.
MAJOR COLLECTOR STREET
LARIMER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO , FIGURE
URB
AN AREA FIGURE ESTREET STANDARDS DATE : 09 / 11 /00 7 - 4F
FORT COLLINS ONLY
76' ROW MIN .
5' 8 8 5' WALK
KWY 50' ROADWAY PKWY (MIN)
WALK (MIN .) (MIN .)
(MIN) 9' UTIL .
6' 6' ` t ESM'T.
9IK
' -
UTIL. BIKE
LN 11 ' 11 ' BLNE
ESM'T.
81 TRAVEL TRAVEL 81
I PARK PARK 7 SETBACK FENCE
8' 121 8'
BIKE EFTTUR BIKE
LN . 11 11 LN .
TRAVEL TRAVEL
50' Roadway
INTERSECTIONS
(WHERE NEEDED)
ROADWAY WIDTH : 50'
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 76' (min .)
TRAVEL LANES : Two lanes, 1 1 ' wide .
LEFT TURN LANES : 12' wide at intersections where needed .
BIKE LANES : Two lanes, 6' wide . (8' wide where adjacent to curb)
PARKING : Two lanes, 8' wide; parking may be removed at certain locations to provide a
left turn lane at intersections where needed .
PARKWAY: 8' (min .) width . Additional width optional .
SIDEWALK: 5' (min .) width . Additional width may be required for higher pedestrian traffic within
and leading to activity areas.
MEDIAN : Not required , except where necessary to control access and/or to provide pedestrian refuge .
additional roadway and ROW width may be required .
WHERE USED : These specifications shall apply as required by the Local Entity, when a Collector street is shown
on the Master Street Plan or when the traffic volume on the street is anticipated to be in the
range of 2 , 500 to 3 ,500 vehicles per day.
DESIGN SPEED : 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 25-30 MPH
ACCESS : Access will be limited . Points of access must be approved by the Local Entity.
CONTINUITY: The street shall be continuous for no more than 1320 feet.
FENCES : Fences shall be setback a minimum of 7 from the parkway edge of the sidewalk.
CURB AND GUTTER : Vertical curb and gutter.
MINOR COLLECTOR STREET
LUSTRE'ET
MER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO , FIGURE
R
BAN AREA FIGURE
E STANDARDS DATE : 09 / 11 / 00 7 - 5F
FORT COLLINS ONLY
72' ROW (MIN .)
5' 5'
WALK 6' 50' ROADWAY 6 WALK
(MIN) PKWy pKWy (MIN)
(MIN ) (MIN )
9' T MIN . FENCE SETBACK
UTI L. az Y
ESMT 9' UTIL.
6' 11 11 ' / 61 ESMT
BIKE TRAVEL TRAVEL BIKE
g 1 1 LN . g
II � PARK PARK
7' 12' 7'
BIKE BIKE
LN . 12' -EFT TURN 12' LN .
TRAVEL TRAVEL
50' ROADWAY
INTERSECTIONS
(WHERE NEEDED)
ROADWAY WIDTH : 50' wide
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 72' (min .)
TRAVEL LANES : Two lanes, 11 ' wide .
LEFT TURN LANES : 12' wide , provided at certain intersections where needed .
BIKE LANES : Two lanes , 6' wide, 7 wide where a left turn lane is provided .
PARKING : Two lanes, 8' wide . None provided at intersections or where a left turn lane is required .
PARKWAY: 6' (min .) width . Additional width optional .
SIDEWALK: 5' (min .) width . Additional width may be required within and leading to activity areas.
MEDIAN : Not required , except where necessary to control access and/or to provide pedestrian
refuge . Additional roadway and right of way width may be required .
WHERE USED : These specifications shall apply to streets used in commercial areas for local access and
circulation , when the traffic volume on the street is anticipated to be 2 ,500 vpd or less.
DESIGN SPEED : 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
ACCESS : Access will be limited . Points of access must be approved by the Local Entity.
CONTINUITY: Streets are limited in length to 1320 feet.
FENCES : Setback a minimum of 7 from the parkway edge of the sidewalk.
CURB AND GUTTER : Vertical curb and gutter.
COMMERCIAL LOCAL STREET
LUSTRE'ET
MER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO , FIGURE
R
BAN AREA FIGURE
E STANDARDS DATE : 11 / 16 /00 7 - 6F
FORT COLLINS ONLY
66' ROW (MIN .)
4.5' 4.5'
WAL 44' ROADWAY WAL
(MIN) 6 . 5' 6 . 5' (MIN)
PKWY PKWY
(MIN.) (MIN .)
6.5' MIN . FENCE SETBACK
9'
ESMT 12' 12'
9' UTIL.
ESMT
TRAVEL TRAVEL
IIj PARK PARK
10' 10'
ROADWAY WIDTH : 44' wide
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 66' (min . ) plus 18' (min .) utility easement.
TRAVEL LANES : Two lanes, 12' wide .
LEFT TURN LANES : None . If needed , parking would be prohibited .
BIKE LANES : Bicyclists shall share the travel lanes with motor vehicles. Additional width may be required in the parking
lanes to provide 14' wide bike/parking shared lanes within and leading to activity areas .
PARKING : Two lanes 10' wide .
PARKWAY: 6 . 5' (min .) width . Additional width optional .
SIDEWALK: 4 . 5' (min .) width . Additional width may be required within and leading to activity areas .
MEDIAN : Not required , except where necessary to control access and/or to provide pedestrian
refuge . Additional roadway and right of way width may be required .
WHERE USED : These specifications shall apply to streets used in industrial areas for local access and
circulation , when the traffic volume on the street is anticipated to be 2 , 500 vpd or less.
DESIGN SPEED : 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
ACCESS : Access will be limited . Points of access must be approved by the Local Entity.
CONTINUITY: Streets are limited in length to 1320 feet.
FENCES : Setback a minimum of 6 . 5' from the parkway edge of the sidewalk .
CURB AND GUTTER : Vertical curb and gutter.
INDUSTRIAL LOCAL STREET
LUSTRE'ET
MER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO , FIGURE
R
BAN AREA FIGURE
E STANDARDS DATE : 09 / 11 / 00 7 - 7F
FORT COLLINS ONLY
57' ROW (MIN .)
S 36' ROADWAY 5'
ALK WALK
(MIN) 6 6' (MIN)
PKWY PKWY
(MIN ) (MIN.)
6. 5' MIN . FENCE SETBACK
9
UTIL.
ESMTH 10' 10' 9' UTIL.
TRAVELTRAVELESMT.
PARK PAR
8' 8'
10,
LEFT
13' TURN 13'
TRAVEL TRAVEL
36' ROADWAY
INTERSECTIONS
(WHERE NEEDED)
ROADWAY WIDTH : 36' wide without bike lane ; 42' wide with bike lane ; 36' ; wide with left turn lane .
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 57 (min) plus 18' (min .) utility easement.
TRAVEL LANES : Two lanes, 10' wide , 13' wide at intersections shared with bicyclists, or 10' wide where
bike lanes are required .
LEFT TURN LANES : 10' wide, at intersections where needed .
BIKE LANES : Bicyclists shall share the roadway with motor vehicles in the travel lanes .
Additional street width may be required to add bike lanes 6' wide on each side
to accommodate bike traffic within and leading to activity areas.
PARKING : Two lanes 8' wide. Parking will be removed at intersections where a left turn lane is required .
PARKWAY: 6' (min .) width . Additional width optional .
SIDEWALK: 4 . 5' (min .) width . Additional width may be required for higher pedestrian traffic
serving activity areas .
MEDIAN : Not required , except where necessary to control access and/or to provide pedestrian
refuge . Additional roadway and right of way width may be required .
WHERE USED : These specifications shall apply to streets where traffic volume on the street is
anticipated to be in the range of 1 , 000 to 2 , 500 vpd .
DESIGN SPEED : 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
ACCESS : Access will be limited . Points of access must be approved by the Local Entity.
CONTINUITY: The street shall be continuous for no more than 1320 feet.
FENCES : Fences shall be setback a minimum of 6. 5' from the parkway edge of the sidewalk.
CURB AND GUTTER : Vertical curb and gutter.
CONNECTOR LOCAL STREET
LLARIMER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO : FIGURERBAN AREA FIGURE
ET STANDARDS DATE : 09/ 11 /00 7 - 8F
FORT COLLINS ONLY
51 ' ROW (MIN .)
4 . 5' 4 . 5'
LK
GAIN) 30' ROADWAY (LK MIN)
6' 6'
PKWY PKWY
(MIN ) (MIN.)
6' . 5 Min . Fence Setback
9
UTIL
ESMT. 16' 9' UTIL.
TRAVEL ESMT.
II PARK PARK
7' 7'
INTERSECTIONS
(WHERE NEEDED)
ROADWAY WIDTH : 30' wide.
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 51 ' (min)
TRAVEL LANES : 16' wide .
LEFT TURN LANES : None.
BIKE LANES : Bicyclists to share travel lane with motor vehicles . Additional street width , up to 4'
wider, may be required in the travel lane to accommodate bike traffic to serve activity areas, such
as schools and parks.
PARKING : Two lanes 7' wide .
SIDEWALK: 4 . 5' (min .) width . Additional width may be required for higher pedestrian traffic
serving activity areas.
MEDIANS : None .
WHERE USED : All residential local streets where traffic volume is anticipated to be 1000 vpd or
less . (unless the Narrow Residential Local Street or Rural Residential Local Street standards are used)
DESIGN SPEED : 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
ACCESS : Access will be unlimited in accordance with these standards.
CONTINUITY: The street shall be continuous for no more than 1320 feet.
FENCES : Fences shall be setback a minimum of 6 . 5' from the parkway edge of the sidewalk.
CURB AND GUTTER : Vertical curb and gutter, or driveover. However, if driveover is used , the parkways must be
widened by T and thereby, the required right of way width will increase by 2' to provide 53' .
RESIDENTIAL LOCAL STREET
L
MER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO : FIGURERBAN AREAFIGUREET STANDARDS DATE : 09/ 11 /00 7 - 9F
FORT COLLINS ONLY
45' ROW (Min .)
4 . 5' 4.5'
Walk 24 Walk
(Min) Roadway (Min)
6' 6'
Pkwy Pkwy
(Min.) (Min.)
i 9' 6.5' Min . Fence Setback
UTIL.
.wv ` UTIL.
ESM'T.i
i
7' Travel
Lo i
ParkJL
ROADWAY WIDTH : 24'
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 45' (min .)
TRAVEL LANES : 17' wide.
LEFT TURN LANES : none .
BIKE LANES : Bicyclists to share travel lane with motor vehicle . Additional street width , up to
4' wider, may be required in the travel lane to accomodate bike traffic to serve activity areas,
such as schools and parks.
PARKING : One lane 7 wide . Parking shall be removed at intersections where space is needed for two travel lanes.
SIDEWALK: 4 . 5' (min .) width . Additional width maybe required for pedestrian routes to
schools , parks, or other activity areas.
WHERE USED : This street may be used for single family dwelling areas where: (1 ) the dwelling units
all have off-street parking accesss from an alley; (2) blocks do not exceed 660 feet in length and ; (3) traffic
volume, on the street is anticipated to be 700 vpd or less.
DESIGN SPEED : 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
ACCESS : None . Access will be taken from the alley.
CONTINUITY: The street shall be continuous for no more than 660 feet.
FENCES : Fences shall be setback a minimum of 6 . 5' from the parkway edge of the sidewalk.
CURB AND GUTTER : Vertical curb and gutter.
SIGNS : "No Parking" signs are required on one side of the street.
NARROW RESIDENTIAL LOCAL STREET ( Used w/Alleys Only )
L
MER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO : FIGURE
RBAN AREAFIGUREET STANDARDS DATE : 09 / 11 / 00 7 - 10F
FORT COLLINS ONLY
81 8
utitil . util .
Esmt. Esmt.
12'- 20'
3' (min . ) Fence Setback
ROW
Back of Conc.
Concrete Pavements
ROADWAY WIDTH : 12' to 201 . (20' width required for commercial and industrial areas)
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 12' to 20' . (20' width required for commercial and industrial areas)
PARKING : None . Parking must be provided on private property.
WHERE USED : An alley may be used to provide secondary vehicular access only to the rear of properties
served by a street, if allowed by city code.
DESIGN SPEED : 15 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 15 MPH .
DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS TO ALLEYS : Driveway connections to alleys must be flared in accordance with
Detail 1 .
ALLEY CONNECTIONS TO STREETS : Where an alley intersects the right of way for a street 10' x 10' corner
cuts shall be dedicated as R . O . W . for visibility as shown in Detail 2 below. These areas may be landscaped no
higher than 12" . No fences may encroach into this area.
CONTINUITY: Alleys are limited in length to 660 feet.
GARAGE DOOR SET BACK : * Option 1 : 8' for fences placed with a setback equal to 8' or more .
Option 2 : 20' feet minimum for fences placed less than 8' from the edge of the alley.
FENCES : Fences may be placed as close as 3' from the right-of-way line on private property when the garage
door is set back at least 20' from the right-of-way. Minimum setback is 8' for garage door setback less than
20' from the right-of-way.
* Building setbacks shall be in accordance with the Land Use Code .
STREET
ALLEY Alley Driveway Flare
101, io, Sidewalk
Flare Width a b
lb FT. FT. FT.
1 01 io
20 0 0
Surface same DRIVE 18 2' 6'
as driveway WAY 16 4' 8' ALLEY
14 5' 8'
12 6' 8'
DETAIL 1 DETAIL 2
ALLEY OPTION ( A ) ( Drainage to Center )
LARIMER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO * 1 FIGURE
URBAN AREA FIGURE
STREET STANDARDS DATE : 04/ 01 / 07 7 - 1 1 F
FORT COLLINS ONLY
-4 $ 8'
util . util .
Esmt. 12' 20' Esmt.
ROW
Back of Curb to
Back of Curb
3' (min .) Fence Setback
j7L #
1 ' x 1 ' \ Parallel Parking Allowed with
Conc. Edge Fence Setback at 8'
Driveover C&G
ROADWAY WIDTH : 12' to 201 . (20' width required for commercial and industrial areas)
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 12' to 20' . (20' width required for commercial and industrial areas)
PARKING : None . Parking must be provided on private property.
WHERE USED : An alley may be used to provide secondary vehicular access only to the rear of properties
served by a street, if allowed by city code.
DESIGN SPEED : 15 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 15 MPH .
DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS TO ALLEYS : Driveway connections to alleys must be flared in accordance with
Detail 1 .
ALLEY CONNECTIONS TO STREETS : Where an alley intersects the right of way for a street 10' x 10' corner
cuts shall be dedicated as R . O . W . for visibility as shown in Detail 2 below. These areas may be landscaped no
higher than 12" . No fences may encroach into this area.
CONTINUITY: Alleys are limited in length to 660 feet.
GARAGE DOOR SET BACK : * Option 1 : 8' for fences placed with a setback equal to 8' or more .
Option 2 : 20' feet minimum for fences placed less than 8' from the edge of the alley.
FENCES : Fences may be placed as close as 3' from the right-of-way line on private property when the garage
door is set back at least 20' from the right-of-way. Minimum setback is 8' for garage door setback less than
20' from the right-of-way.
* Building setbacks shall be in accordance with the Land Use Code .
STREET
—4a,� ALLEY Alley Driveway Flare
Flare Width a b io' .� — 101 , � Sidewalk
lb FT. FT. FT.
io1 io
1 /
20 0 0
Surface same DRIVE 18 2' 6'
as driveway WAY 16 4' 8' ALLEY
14 5' 8'
12 1 6' 8'
DETAIL 1 DETAIL 2
ALLEY OPTION ( B ) ( Drainage to One Side )
LARIMER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO * 1 FIGURE
URBAN AREA FIGURE
STREET STANDARDS DATE : 04/ 01 / 07 7 - 12F
FORT COLLINS ONLY
5' " /- 5'
UTIL. 46' ROW UTIL .
ESM'T. ESM'T.
9' 28' 9'
Roadway
— Fence
ROADWAY WIDTH : 281
.
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH : 46' (min .)
BIKE LANES : Bicyclists share the travel lanes with motor vehicles.
PARKWAY: Both sides of the street.
PARKING : Both sides of street.
CURB AND GUTTER : Drive over or vertical curb and gutter.
WHERE USED : These specifications may be used for internal local streets of developments,
with minimum lot sizes of one (1 ) acre or larger, and when the traffic volume, on the street is anticipated to be less than 300 vpd .
ACCESS : Access will be unlimited in accordance with these standards.
CONTINUITY: Streets are limited in length to 1 , 320 feet.
DESIGN SPEED : 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
FENCES : Fences may be set on the right-of-way line as long as required sight distance is not obstructed .
GARAGE DOOR SETBACKS : 50' .
SIDEWALK: None .
RURAL RESIDENTIAL LOCAL STREET
LU]
MER COUNTY DESIGN REVISION NO , FIGURE
BAN AREA FIGURE
ET STANDARDS DATE : 09 / 11 /00 7 - 13F
Appendix H
NOTE : Appendix Information is for Reference
Only. Contact Local Entity Engineer for Current
Information .
Fort Collins
Multimodal Transportation
Level of Service Manual
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted October 1 , 2002
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland , City of Fort Collins
i
's
i !
City of Fort Collins s
.....__............._. _............... .................._.............,.._..__...................
Multimodal Transportation
Level of Service Manual
_.. .................._.........,... ............... .......... .
March 28, 1997
i
€ __. . . . . ...........................r.... - _......t..........
j
s €
.................................a........................._ ;........._._. ..__.._�. - ....
� E
_.. ... _......._ ..............a................
/" ' 5 ^ City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. z
Goals, Objectives and Standards
PRINCIPLE GM - 5 : The provision of adequate
Part 1 . public facilities and thA phasing of infrastructure
Improvements will be important considerations in
Adequate Public Facilities Plan the timing and location of development.
Policy GM-5 . 1 Phasing of Development. The
provision of public facilities and services will be utilized to
Goals. Objectives and Standards direct development in desired directions, according to the
following considerations:
Level of Service (LOS) standards do not exist as stand-alone measures,
but are part of a system of goals, objectives and standards. They are Development will only be permitted where it can be
interpreted by the public and by elected decision makers in the context adequately served by critical public facilities and
of current and future issues, trends, conditions, expectations, and services such as water, sewer, police, transportation,
perceptions and they require a system of measurement. schools, fire, storm water management, and parks.
LOS standards are an important form of municipal "policy" and are • New roads and other City services shall not be extended
based on the City of Fort Collins "Community Vision and Goals 2015," to serve development outside the designated Urban
the "City Structure Plan" and the "City Plan Principles and Policies" Growth Area (Stage 1 ) Moreover, the City shall not
documents developed as part of the City Plan process. LOS standards enter into any agreements with other jurisdictions to
provide a means of testing the City's plan for future land uses (as jointly fund or construct infrastructure improvements or
represented in the Structure Plan ) against the City's goals for provide services that might foster growth outside of the
transportation and for overall quality of life. Urban Growth Area (Stage 1 ) . These policies will not
preclude the City from working with other jurisdictions
The LOS standards also provide a means of applying the City's goals to provide services and facilities which benefit the
in the development review process. entire community such as regional trails, open space and
parks .
The general principle and specific policies that give rise to the
Adequate Public Facilities (APF) requirement are found in the City's • Development which occurs within the Urban Growth
Principles and Policies. Area (Stage 1 ) shall have at least one-sixth of its
boundary area contiguous with existing urban
The provisions dealing with adequate public facilities and the development.
Principles from the Transportation section are reprinted below:
• Preferential consideration will be given to the extension
and augmentation of public services and facilities to
accommodate infill and redevelopment before new
growth areas are prepared for development.
City of Fort Collin ,; Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 3 '
Goals, Objectives and Standards
• The City will review applications for the creation of
new special service agencies and the expansion of PRINCIPLE T-5 : Tho City will acknowledge
existing special service agencies for conformance with pedestrian travel as a viable transportation mode
these City Plan Principles and Policies. and elevate it in importance to be in balance with
all other modes . Dirrict pedestrian connections
• The City will work with Larimer County to develop will be provided and encouraged from place of
plans and policies for public services and facilities residence to transit, schools, activity centers , work
required for new and existing development located in and public facilities .
unincorporated areas of the City's Urban Growth Area,
with special consideration to those subareas and
neighborhoods where more detailed planning will PRINCIPLE T- 6 : Street crossings will be
follow the adoption of these City Plan Principles and developed to be safe, comfortable , and attractive .
Policies.
• The City should charge additional fees to non -city PRINCIPLE T-7 : The City will encourage the
residents who utilize City services. development of comfortable and attractive
pedestrian facilities and settings to create an
interesting pedestrian network.
PRINCIPLE T- 1 : The physical organization of the
city will be supported by a framework of
transportation alternatives that maximizes access PRINCIPLE T-8 : The City shall develop secure
and mobility throughout the city , while reducing pedestrian settings by developing a well - lit
dependence upon the private automobile . inhabited pedestrian network and by mitigating the
impacts of vehicles .
PRINCIPLE T-2 : Mass transit will be an integral
part of the city's overall transportation system. PRINCIPLE T-9 : Privato automobiles will continue
to be an important means of transportation .
PRINCIPLE T - 3 : Transportation Demand
Management will be a critical component in the PRINCIPLE T-10: The City will participate in a
City's overall transportation system. coordinated , regional approach to transportation
planning .
PRINCIPLE T-4 : Bicycling will serve as a viable
alternative to automobile use for all trip purposes .
/`� City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 4
Goals. Objectives and Standards
The "Adequate Public Facilities" principle is intended to ensure that provided (hours of service, frequency of service, and so forth). Also, as
adequate transportation infrastructure and services required to meet with the bicycle and pedestrian modes, the proximity of transit
the needs and demands created by new development will be provided service becomes an issue to be addressed by LOS standards.
by the time the development is occupied (that is, concurrently).
For each non-auto travel mode -- bicycle, pedestrian and public transit
The purpose of these Level of Service standards is to provide a -- the LOS standards do not require forecasts of user volumes or
definition of "adequate" -- for each mode of travel. demand . Instead , they are designed to ensure ubiquitous availability
of adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and transit service.
General Methodology In the case of roadways, however, estimating future LOS conditions
requires predicting future traffic levels. In other words, forecasting
Historically, LOS standards were applied only to roadways and only future roadway LOS involves forecasting both supply and demand .
in engineering. Their primary purpose was to facilitate the design of
specific roadway improvement projects based on forecast demand .
Now, however, LOS standards also serve as performance planning and
measurement systems. The City of Fort Collins has chosen to develop Coordination With Other Plans
performance-based LOS standards and to do so for all modes.
On the following two pages are tables listing the City's goals,
Evaluating LOS standards for purposes of determining their adequacy objectives and standards from which the proposed LOS standards
under City policy requires more than an evaluation of specific have been derived . The tables are divided into four modes of travel:
transportation facilities. Roadways that are of adequate width and public transit, pedestrian, bicycle and motor vehicle.
design must also be adequately connected into the larger street grid .
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities, too, must be connected into the City of Fort Collins documents relied upon in preparing LOS Standards
City's grid of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. for the modes included :
Applying LOS standards to specific sidewalks, for example, would Fort Collins Congestion Management Plan:
ignore the issue of whether the sidewalk in question is connected to • Communbly Vision and Goals 2015 ;
the rest of the pedestrian network. Similarly, proximity to service • City Structure Plan :
and connectivity to the larger city-wide grid are important issues for City Plan Principles and Policies;
all modes and are included in the LOS standards. Fort Collins Bicycle Program Plan;
• Residential Street Standards:
In the case of public transit, the "bricks and mortar" phvsical Transit Development Plan 1996-2002: and,
infrastructure approach used to evaluate the other modes 1s not Fort Collins Pedestrian Plan.
adequate to the task. Transit performance is determined , not only by
what is built, but also by the amount and type of operations that are
—� - - ( it if 17oit ( 'o iris ltori � rorIatiun INLi ter I ' Lin
■
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 3°
Goals, Objectives and Standards
Coal
LOS Standard Design Rz Operations Standards �
•µ`A safe, comfortable, Revise local statutes and codes to Pedestrian I OS will be Residential streets: 4.5' wide
attractive and secure increase pedestrian safety and evaluated according to sidewalks with a 6' landscaped
pedestrian environment. security by 1998. prevailing or forecast parkway, except for rural
conditions within a 1/4 mile residential streets, which do not
• A pedestrian network Achieve a level of funding for the sphere of influence. This is require sidewalks, and 36'
which is well-connected pedestrian program which is in to be measured as 1,320 residential infill streets, which do
and directly linked to proportion to mode share. along a straight line radius not require landscaped parkways.
schools, neighborhoods, "as the crow flies" in all
parks, activity centers and Place a high funding priority on directions from the site. Connector streets: 4.5' sidewalks
C other destination areas. pedestrian facilities needed to and a 6' landscaped parkway.
achieve minimum pedestrian LOS . LOS requirements are
Pedestrian facilities which requirements for school walking based on ease of street Collector streets: 5' sidewalks and
ai provide universal access to areas, parks and recreation facilities, crossings, sidewalk an 8' landscaped parkway.
all users, including transit corridors, and activity areas. continuity, directness of
children, the mobility travel, amenities, and Industrial/Commercial Local
impaired, and elders. Achieve active and continuing security and will be streets: 5' sidewalks. and a 6'
involvement by the pedestrian evaluated according to type landscaped parkway.
• Regular maintenance of community in the development and of adjacent land use.
pedestrian facilities. implementation of pedestrian Arterials <35,000 ADT: 6'
policies and facilities. sidewalks and a 10' landscaped
• An urban form which pparkway; arterials > 35,000 /CDT:
promotes pedestrian Ensure that all pedestrian facilities 7' sidewalks and a 10' landscaped
activity. are designed and constructed parkway.
according to new standards.
• A trans ortation s stem • Ensure that the rate of Automobile LOS will be 12' travel lanes will be required
P y growth in vehicle miles evaluated using the latest for all arterial streets and for
which provides both access traveled (VMT) does not version of the Highway collectors without parking.
and mobility and which exceed the rate of growth in Capacity Manual and will
minimizes automobile population. reflect street classification 11 ' travel lanes will be required
dependence. Po P and adjacent land use. for all other streets, except for
connectors and residential streets.
• When LOS falls below
y identified levels in Mixed Residential local streets will have
Use Districts, mitigation a width of 30' for streets with
C will be required in order to parking on both sides of the
ensure a high degree of street or 24' for streets with
accessibility through parking on one side of the street.
D alternative modes.
Residential alleys will be 12-20'
wide.
Note: exceptions to standards mac occur in constrained corridors. A continuous median will be
idors. •
required on all arterial and major
arterial streets.
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. 6
Goals, Objectives and Standards
Goal Objective LOS StandardsDesign & Operations
j standards '
• A safe, convenient, Achieve a continuous system by Bicycle level of service (LOS) 8' bicycle lanes are required
continuous and well- the year 2015. will be evaluated according on all arterial streets and on
connected bicycle system to facility and area-based collectors without parking.
which provides access to Double the percentage of daily requirements.
major destination areas and resident person trips made b A 6' bicycle lane is required on
activity centers. bicycle from 7% in 1995 to 14 in Area LOS requirements are collector streets with parking.
2015. based on connectivity to . An 11 ' shared bicycle and
• A bicycle system which North-South and East-West y
provides links to the • Reduce the bicyycle accident rate corridors. Parking lane or a 6, bicycle
y regional system. by 10% by 2015. lane is required on
commercial local streets.
• industrial/Commercial Local
pp streets require an 11 ' shared
bicycle and parking lane or a
6' bicycle lane.
• An 8' foot bicycle and
pedestrian path connection
will be required to make
neighborhood connections
where streets are not required
or feasible.
• A well-connected intermodal • Ensure that 70%.of the city Transit LOS will be • Ensure transit travel times are
transportation system. has access to transit service evaluated based on hours of no greater than 2.5 times
(1/4 mile walk). weekday service, weekday competing automobile travel
• Frequent, reliable and frequency of service, travel times.
accessible transit service. Double the size of existing time factor and peak load . Weekday head ways will be
service by the year 2002. factor. Yeawa Y
• Transit service oriented reduced to at least 30 minutes
around activity centers. Increase the area served, in all corridors by 2002 and to
frequency of service and no more than 20 minutes in all
• Comfortable transit service. hours of operation by 2002. corridors and to 15 minutes in
+ + mixed-use and commercial
Increase ridership to 2,000,000 corridors by 2015.
annual trips by 2002.
Peak load factor will be less
[. . Reduce transfer wail times. than 1 .2.
• Transit stops will be located
1,000 to 1,400 feet apart in
Note: exceptions to standards may occur in constrained corridors. high-use areas and 2,000 feet
apart in low-use areas.
( ' it . of l wt ( 'cIllin • I r011 ,11cutatito \ Lister flan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. 7
Public Transit LOS
Public Transit LOS
Figure 1. Public Transit LOS -- Standards and Ratings
Transit LOS standards take into account route service characteristics service level standards: mired use cmters
and land use characteristics of the areas served . Figure 1 relies in andcffidn^al remalndar a
g mnidnxa service area
part on standards developed in the City's Transit Development rop bts)
Plan . The service level standards are intended for use in evaluating Hours of weekday service 18 hours 16 hours
service planned by the year 2015. t
The transit LOS rating for an area is based on how many of the four 1 Weekday frequency of service 15 min 20 min
service standards are met. The minimum condition is higher in
mixed use centers and commercial corridors. The level of route Travel time factnq 2.0 X 2.0 X
service is graded higher if the transit routes run within a quarter-
mile of the area being evaluated . Routes more than a half-mile
away cannot be considered in arriving at transit LOS. Peak load factor < 1 .2 < 1.2
The minimum requirements for transit level of service are (by 2015):
LOS ratings: number of sen•ke level standards met
• At least 70% of the land area of Fort Collins outside of Mixed
Use Centers and Commercial Corridors shall be served by all 3of4 2of4 tof4 none
transit at no less than LOS D. areas within 1,320' of A B D E F
transit routes
• For Mixed Use Centers and Commercial Corridors, the
minimum level of service for adequacy is LOS D. areas within 2,640' of B C D E F
Definitions of terms used in Figure 1 are as follows: transit routes
Hours of Weekday Service -- The weekday hours of service on the to park and walk . Transit is measured along the bus route using peak
applicable route, measured from the first scheduled stop to the last. hour speed, including walk, transfer, and expected wait times.
Weekday Frequency of Service -- Peak period headway. Peak Load Factor - - Calculated by dividing the number of passengers
on board at the peak time of day by the available seats.
Travel Tinte Factor -- Portal-to-portal bus travel time divided by
auto travel time. Auto is measured using average speed in peak hour Mixed use centers and commercial corridors are designated on the
via the most direct route on arterials and collectors and includes time City's Structure Plan.
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. 8
Pedestrian LOS
Pedestrian LOS
Unsignalized Intersection Crossing the Major Street : LOS
Five level of service standards specific to pedestrian facilities are elements include grade separation, number of lanes to cross, well-
utilized to address pedestrian needs and land use considerations. marked crosswalks, lighting, raised median width, visibility,
These standards are briefly described below and are defined in more and curb ramps.
detail in Appendix A. Unsignalized Intersection Crossing the Minor Street : LOS
elements include well-marked crosswalks, lighting, and curb
Directness -- Directness is defined as the walking distance to ramps.
destinations including transit stops, schools, parks, commercial
employment, or activity areas. A grid street pattern with sidewalks Mid-block Crossing : LOS elements include grade separation,
on-site or within /adjacent to existing public right of way typifies the number of lanes to cross, strength of crosswalk presence, well
ideal system, however "off-road " multi-use paths may also be marked crosswalks, lighting, raised median width, curb ramps,
considered if practical to provide more direct pedestrian routes. pedestrian signals, convenience, comfort and security.
Measurement of directness is the ratio of the Actual (existing or Visual Interest and Amenity -- To promote pedestrian activity and
proposed ) distance to such destinations by way of pedestrian sidewalk use of transit, the pedestrian system should be esthetically
or pathway divided by Minimum north /south and east/west right compatible with local architecture and should include amenities to
angle distance characterized by the grid street pattern (the A / M serve pedestrians. The attractiveness of the pedestrian network can
ratio ) . range from visually appealing and compatible with local
architecture, including environmental enhancements (such as
Continuity - - Continuity is defined as the completeness of the pedestrian street lighting, fountains, and benches) to an experience of
sidewalk/walkway system with avoidance of gaps. Levels of service discomfort and intimidation, associated with absence of amenities
range from an A/ B, where the pedestrian corridor is integrated within and incompatible architectural design.
the activities along the corridor, to a C, where continuous stretches of
sidewalks with variable widths and design elements, to D/ E, where Security -- Pedestrians require a sense of security, through visual line
there are breaches in the pedestrian network, to F, which indicates of sight with others, separation from motor vehicles and bicycles, and
large gaps in the network. adequate lighting levels. The highest level of service is in an
environment with high pedestrian and police presence, clear lines of
Street Crossings — Each of the four types of street crossings is assigned sight, and good lighting levels. The lowest is where the streetscape is
an LOS rating. totally intimidating with major breaches in pedestrian visibility
from the street, adjacent land uses, and activities. For details
,Signahzed Intersections : LOS elements include grade regarding sight distance and lighting requirements, refer to the City
separation, number of lanes to cross, signal indication, well of Fort Collins' street design standards and codes.
marked crosswalks, lighting, raised median width, visibility,
curb ramps, pedestrian buttons, convenience, comfort and security.
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 9
Pedestrian LOS
While there are design standards for all types of pedestrian There are numerous locations within the City that do not currently
facilities, acceptable level of service thresholds for purposes of meet the minimum level of service standards. Because of limited
concurrency will vary by the type of activity area. funding, improvements will be prioritized toward routes to schools,
parks, transit, and activity areas with the objective of bringing the
The five types of areas are as follows: entire city into compliance with the LOS standards by 2015.
Pedestrian District -- This area includes the existing Fort Collins To prevent an increase in the backlog, new developments, both public
downtown, the CSU area, and a future activity center in the northwest and private, as well as major street improvements and redevelopment,
portion of the city which has been designated on the Fort Collins City must meet these minimum pedestrian level of service standards.
Structure Plan.
The five pedestrian environment factors were developed as part of the
A map ( from the City's Pedestrian Plan) is provided in Appendix A Pedestrian Plan and the LOS letter grades are described in detail in
showing the location of existing and future pedestrian districts. Appendix A.
Activity Corridor/Center -- These include the commercial corridors
of North and South College Avenue as well as areas
within a quarter- mile ( 1 ,320') radius around
neighborhood and community retail centers. They are Figure 2
designated on the map in Appendix A. Pedestrian Level of Service by Location Area Type
Transit Corridor -- These include all areas within a
quarter-mile (1 ,320') of existing transit routes and transit
is routes to be initiated by 2015. "°" direcmesa conCnuirr srrni Visual fore eai xruriry•
am yPt croearngf k amenirin
School Walking Area -- These include all areas within Pe"Iri n A A B A A
a mile (5,280') radius around existing public schools (K -
12) and around sites officially designated by the School acu.•ip• B B B B B
District for future public schools. te°h`�°°`r d°`
tnmil
Other -- This category includes all locations not falling cnnldw B B B C B
within one of the four previous areas.
xhoorl walk
Figure 2 displays minimum conditions required to aRa �l lr 11
achieve the LOS standards. °""' C C C C C
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. to
Bicycle LOS
Bicycle LOS "Directly connected" means the site is penetrated by the bicycle
facility; or the bicycle facility runs immediately adjacent to the
Bicycle LOS standards are based on connectivity to various bike property and is not separated from it by any significant barriers; or
facilities in connecting corridors. For purposes of this analysis, bicycle the bicycle facility runs perpendicular to the property edge and is
corridors may contain one of three types of facilities: readily accessible from the property with no significant barriers.
On -Street Lanes -- These are striped exclusive-use bicycle lanes Bicycle facilities which are not consistent with the City's minimum
within the flow-lines of public streets. design standards will be not considered in evaluating bicycle LOS.
Off-Street Paths -- These are multi-use paths or Figure 3 . Bicycle LOS Standards
exclusive-use bicycle paths that are separate from
public streets. They may be on public or private
land, but must be open for public use to be connectivity required for levels of service:
considered in LOS evaluation.
On-Street Route -- These are low-volume local A I dicesUx connected to both North-South and Fast-Weston-street lanes
streets which the City has designated as Bicycle directly connected to both North-South and East-West corridors at least one of which
Routes and which are signed as such . Bicycles B is a set of on-street lanes
share the travel lanes with motor vehicles. -
C directly connected to either a North-South pt an East-West corridor which is a set of
It is the City's policy that on-street lanes provide on-street lanes
safer and more direct connectivity than off-street p direLdy connected to either a North-South 2E an East-West corridor which is an
multi-use paths. For that reason, higher ratings offsereetpath
are assigned to areas connected to on-street lanes. E indirectly connected via an on-street unstriped mute along a low volume local street to
one or more of the above within 1 /4 mile
The overall approach to bicycle LOS is based on F rw director indirect connections to either North-South or East-West corridors
the fact that the City's bike grid will steadily
approach completion . In the future, it will be
possible, once access to the grid is achieved, to minimum LOS
travel safely by bicycle directly to any other area
that has access to the grid . Thus the issue of base city-wide minimum level: C
connectivity has become paramount. public school sites A
Figure 3 shows the minimum LOS standards for the recreation sites: B
bicycle system. community/neighborhood commercial centers: B
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. 11
Motor Vehicle LOS
Motor Vehicle LOS
Over the past two decades, sophisticated formulas and routines for "LOS objectives for the roadway system should be
measuring arterial roadway LOS have been developed . These take defined in a manner that differentiates bet:veen the type
into account such details as intersection design, signal timing and of urban development being served. Standards for
frequency of connecting driveways. Unfortunately, such variables vehicular circulation within densely developed areas
cannot be reliably forecast twenty-five years into the future . such as the core city and other activity centers should be
set to favor access over mobility. Standards for radial
Instead , forecasts of future roadway LOS must rely on a simpler routes to suburban areas and for through routes should be
approach which compares predicted volume to predicted capacity . set to reflect the importance of community- wide
These "volume to capacity" (V /C) ratios are then used to determine mobility. " (Chapter 8, p. 70)
the LOS letter grade rating (A through F) . The means for predicting
future roadway V /C or LOS levels is the MINUTP traffic model The City's motor vehicle LOS standards have been designed to reflect
maintained by the City's transportation staff and the regional North the type of area being served (based on the City Structure Plan) and
Front Range Transportation & Air Quality Planning Council . the City's system of functional classification of roads. This will
allow the City to manage investments in motor vehicle capacity and
(Note: for purposes of completing a "Transportation Impact Study" for efficiency in a manner that supports its land use plan.
specific proposed development projects, a method of measuring
roadway LOS is required which involves applying Highway The City of Fort Collins functional classification system recognizes
Capacity Manual procedures and LOS definitions.) four broad categories of roadway. (Only arterials and collectors are
shown on the City's adopted Master Streets Plan map.)
Prior to adoption in early 1995 of the Congestion Management Plan,
the City had an objective of maintaining at least LOS D on all The four classifications are defined below:
arterial roadways.
ARTERIAL
The City's Congestion Management Plan (CMP) changed that (includes: Major Arterials, Arterials, and Minor Arterials)
approach, addressing motor vehicle LOS as follows:
One or more of the following conditions may apply:
"This objective (LOS D) is unachievable for file core area
of the city; all of the scenarios examined by the provides direct service to major center(s) of activity;
Committee predicted so►ne of the arterial system would provides continuity and length for crosstown trips;
fall below this level. LOS D is also not an adequate basis connects to at least one other arterial; and ,
for roadway system planning because it has a tendency to • may carry high levels of traffic (>3,500 vpd ).
direct capacity investments to where they are not
appropriate . . .
�r City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. 12
Motor Vehicle Los
COLLECTOR (Note: the City 's street design standards provide more detail on
(includes: Collectors With and Without Parking physical characteristics of streets by functional classification.)
One or more of the following conditions may apply: The street system provides both mobility (the ability to get across
town ) and access (the ability to get to a specific location ) . It is
• connects local streets with arterial streets; important to balance these competing demands, and it is important
• continuity and length may be less than one mile; that LOS standards adopted for motor vehicles reflect this balance.
• some commercial activity may be present in the corridor; and, Where arterials and collectors pass through built-up commercial
• may carry moderate levels of traffic (2,500 - 3,500 vpd ). areas (e.g., downtown) they may become congested in the future and
there will be no way to build roadway improvement projects to
eliminate such congestion.
CONNECTOR
J 1 (includes: Connectors only Successful destination areas usually reach levels of motor vehicle traffic that cann4 +t be handled at high levels of service. This occurs
One or more of the following conditions may apply: because the "people-holding" capacity of successful commercial areas
eventually exceeds the traffic capacity of the roadways that serve
• connects local streets to collector(s) or arterial(s); them . At such locations, alternative means of getting around
• gathers traffic from throughout a residential district; (especially walking, but also including transit and bicycling) become
• continuity and length may be less than one mile; important.
• connects adjacent residential districts; and,
• may carry traffic of 1 ,000 - 2,000 vpd . To the extent that arterial and collector roadways transect successful
destination areas, they will become less effective for purposes of
achieving long distance mobility. At this point, the "access" function
LOCAL becomes more important to the public than "mobility." In Fort
(includes: Commercial Local, Industrial Local, Residential Local, Collins, these conditions are anticipated for "commercial corridors"
Narrow Residential Local, and Rural Residential Local) and within "mixed use districts." The motor vehicle LOS standards
shown in Figure 4 on the next page reflect this fact.
One or more of the following conditions may apply:
The LOS standards in Figure 4 recognize five levels of roadways and
• provides access to property; four categories of land use (from the City Structure Plan):
• continuity with the street network may occur only at one end;
• facility length may be less than one mile; • commercial corridors (e.g., College Avenue);
• may connect to connector(s) or collector(s); and, • mixed use districts (e.g., downtown, campus);
• carries low levels of traffic (< 1 ,000 vpd, except up to 2,500 • low density mixed residential areas; and,
vpd for commercial and industrial local streets). 0 all other land uses.
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 13
Motor Vehicle LOS
Local streets present special issues . Their primary
function is local access, and in many cases the principal 1 ' lgLlre 4 . Nlotoi- Vehicle LOS Stawdards
issue is not capacity, but rather the impacts of traffic on
adjacent properties.
land use (from structure plan)
Local streets are not included in Figure 4 and are not
included in the evaluation of the "adequate public roadway
Other Corridors Within:
facilities" performance of the City Structure Plan and the functional Commercial Nixed Use Low Density All Other
Master Street Plan . The City has developed a special classification Corridor. Districts Mixed Areas
"Neighborhood Transportation Impact Analysis" process Residential
to address issues related to local street performance. Major Arterial E E* D D
In addition to the recognition of the special situations
anticipated along commercial corridors and within mixed Arterial FE E* D D
use districts, the City has identified two circumstances forspecial treatment : "Constrained Corridors " and Minor Arterial E* C D
"Backlogged Facilities. "
These are defined as follows: Collector i
D * C D
Constrained Corridors -- These are segments of the street
network which are physically constrained from further Connector C* $ C
widening or major reconstruction. The constraint may be 0
caused by the proximity of buildings (e.g., along College in ' Corridors within mixed use districts may fall below the LOS level
Downtown Fort Collins) or by environmental conditions indicated . In such cases, the City will provide for mitigation of
(e.g., the presence of a wetland or riparian corridor). congestion through altematives to motor vehicle travel.
Backlogged Facilities These are roadway segments Which
currently operate below the LOS standards in Figure 4. These
roadways are normally adjacent to developed properties and are not
expected to be improved by future development.
Both Constrained Corridors and Backlogged Facilities will be
identified on a city map. These special circumstances will warrant
special treatment in the development review process described in Part
11 of this Manual .
CRY of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. 14
LOS Standards for Development Review
Part H .
LOS Standards for Development
Review
The LOS standards set forth in Part 1 of this Manual form the basis for
planning the future location and intensity of land uses in Fort Collins
E as embodied in the City Structure Plan.
The LOS standards define "acceptable" relationships between future
land development patterns and transportation demand in terms of
overall service levels by the year 2015. A number of specific strategies
will be required to achieve city-wide transportation adequacy.
Among these is evaluating the level of service of each of the
transportation modes as part of the development review process.
'r
The document which outlines the process for evaluation of proposed
new development in terms of transportation LOS standards is the
"Transportation Impact Study Guidelines " which is available from
the City's development review staff.
Part II of this Manual provides detailed guidance on comparing the
existing LOS condition for each of the modes with the minimum
standards, and for forecasting future LOS conditions once development
occurs.
fr ��^ City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. is
LOS Standards for Development Review - Public Transit
Public Transit LOS Standards for Development Review For purposes of development review, the "travel time factor' shall be
calculated to four specific destinations:
Evaluation of public transit LOS shall be based on Figure 1 of this the CSU Campus Transit Center
Manual . Foothills Fashion Mall (north entrance)
• Fort Collins High School (main entrance)
All development sites within the City shall be evaluated with Downtown Fort Collins (corner of Mountain and College) .
respect to the level of transit service serving the site as outlined in the
Transportation Impact Study Guidelines and this Manual, and shall Travel speed will be based on an average bus speed of twelve miles per
be based on the City's long range transit service plan. (Appendix B hour. Travel time components within the existing TransFort system,
provides a map of the routes and service levels planned for 2015.) wait times, and resulting differentials shall be based on current data
i (not forecast data) provided by the TransFort Manager.
Although each proposed new development within the City will
require a transit analysis as part of a Transportation Impact Study at The "peak load factor" calculation shall be based on current data (not
the time of development review, development that is in conformance forecast data) provided by the TransFort Manager. For all future
with the Structure Plan and Zoning Map mill not he precluded front routes not currently in existence, the peak load factor shall be
proceeding by virtue of failing to meet the transit level of service test presumed to be 1 .0.
for adequate public facilities.
Project applicants should request transit service data from TransFort
For sites outside of Mixed Use Centers and Commercial Corridors, the prior to submitting their Transportation Impact Study. An
minimum level of public transit service is Level of Service D or better appropriate time to request this data is at the Initial Scoping Meeting
based on the City's long range transit service plan. (See Appendix B.) called for in the Transportation Impact Study Guidelines.
For sites within Mixed Use Centers and Commercial Corridors, the
minimum level of public transit service is Level of Service B or better
based on the City's lag range transit service plan. (See Appendix B.)
A site may be graded as "served " by public transit only if the transit
route utilizes a street that lies within one-half mile (2,640') Of the
proposed development site.
Site evaluation pursuant to Figure 1 of service frequency, hours of
weekday service and route location are to be based on planned service
characteristics in 2015 (shown in Appendix B).
Cil v of Fort Colhnm Tranchurmtion Master flan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 16
LOS Standards for Development Review • Pedestrian
Pedestrian LOS Standards for Development Review 0 "transit corridor" -- These include all areas
within a quarter-mile ( 1 ,320') of existing transit routes
Development approval will not be granted for projects which would and transit routes to be initiated within seven years.
fail to meet minimum LOS standards for pedestrian facilities at the
time of issuance of any building permit. "school walking area" These include all areas
within a mile (5,280') radius around existing public
Figure 6 (on page 18) provides a worksheet which shall be used to schools ( K- 12) and around sites designated by the
compare actual pedestrian conditions with the minimum standard School District for future public schools.
and, if applicable, with a future condition once improvements have
been made. "other' - This category includes all locations
not falling within one of the four previous areas.
Applicants should follow this step-by-step process for evaluating
pedestrian LOS: Step 2. Using Figure 5 (on page 17), determine the
applicable LOS minimum standards for the project
Step 1. Determine whether the project is located based on its location relative to the area types. If the
within one or more of the five types of location areas: project site is located in more than one area type, the
pedestrian district, activity corridor /center, transit type with the higher LOS standards shall be used .
corridor, school walking area, or other area. These are
defined below . The identification of location area type Step 3. Identify all "destination areas" located within
forms the basis for determining minimum LOS a quarter-mile (1 ,320') of outside edges of the project
standards . site . Six types of destinations should be identified :
• "pedestrian district" -- This area includes the 0 "recreation sites" -- These include public parks,
existing Fort Collins downtown, the CSU area, and a sports facilities, public tennis courts and other sites
future activity center in the northwest portion of the where the public would be expected to go to participate
city which has been designated on the Fort Collins City in physical recreation and sports activities.
Structure Plan . A map ( from the City's Pedestrian
Plan) is provided in Appendix A showing the location " residential areas' These include any
of existing and future pedestrian districts. concentration of at least ten dwelling units that may
reasonably be regarded as a contiguous neighborhood or
• "activity corridor/center" -- These include the which are part of a single subdivision .
commercial corridors of North and South College
Avenue and areas within a quarter-mile (1 ,320') radius " institutional sites " These include all
around neighborhood and community retail centers. churches, public schools, and public buildings which
They are designated on the map in Appendix A . regularly receive the public for public business.
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
■
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. 17
LOS Standuds for Development Review - Pedestrian
• "office buildings" These include all The worksheet in Figure 6 will form the basis for City review of
commercial office buildings, office parks, and office- development proposals. Agreement should be reached at the Initial
type employment campuses with building area of at Scoping Meeting concerning which of the location area types will
least 25,000 square feet. apply to the project site for which the Transportation Impact Study is
being prepared, and concerning which destination areas should be
• "commercial sites" These include any retail included in the worksheet.
space of at least 15,000 square feet including shopping
centers, strip shopping areas, and shopping malls. If applicable, developers may meet pedestrian LOS standards by
voluntarily providing off-site improvements to achieve minimum
• "industrial sites' -- These include all other non- conditions. Such off-site improvements, however, are not exactions
residential sites of at least 50,000 square feet of imposed by the City but rather are voluntary actions taken by the
building space utilized for manufacturing, assembly, developer, at its sole option, to accelerate the achievement of
shipping or warehousing activities. adequate public facilities on the project site. The costs of such off-site
improvements shall not be credited by the City against any financial
List all applicable destination areas in the boxes obligations for which the developer may otherwise be responsible
provided at the left side of the worksheet along with (such as Street Oversizing or Transportation Impact Fee). Appendix A
their addresses. Show the destination area provides descriptions of the standards (column headings in Figure 5)
classification of each in the second column. Space for up and conditions to be utilized in assignment of letter grades.
to four destination areas is provided in the worksheet.
If more than four sites are identified, use additional
copies of the worksheet. Figure 5
Minimum Pedestrian Level of Service
Step 4. Based on Figure 5 above, fill in the applicable
minimum LOS standards in the boxes for each ate, ,, co«tnvat. 11 � YtlWIlnt 1 xuritr
destination area identified (the minimum standard ism' �� ��
based on the location of the project site, identified inMa A A B A A
Step 1 above, so the entries in the "minimum" boxes will
be the same for all destination areas. ""rkv>
t'nM/Ce B B B B B
Step S. Based on actual documented field measurement, tramil B B B C B
show the actual LOS condition for the areas between ,.te«
the nearest publicly-accessible edge of the project site B EB B C B
and each of the destination areas in the worksheet. In
the "proposed" row of boxes, show the LOS conditions C C C C C
that would result from any pedestrian improvements
proposed as part of project development.
j`� City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p . IR
LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian
Figure h . Pedestrian LOS Worksheet
project location classification: (enter as many as apply)
description of applicable destination area level of service (minimum based on project location classification )
destination area within 1 ,320' classification
fr
II\ClUding address (see text) n;rnIn.» cmumm�' aro � Im,rn� b FI
m ln..
«mn
actual
proposed
actual
proposed
mhinn actua I
proposed
actual t
ac
proposed
Citv of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. 19
LOS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle
Bicycle LOS Standards for Development Review The worksheet in Figure 7 will form the basis for City review of
development proposals. Agreement should be reached at the Initial
Scoping Meeting concerning which destination areas should be
Development approval will not be granted for projects which will not included in the worksheet. The applicant should evaluate the base
meet two LOS standards by the time the project is to be occupied : LOS condition at the top part of the worksheet and evaluate
connections to all applicable destination areas in the rows provided .
The project must be directly connected to the greater Fort Collins If there are more than four destination areas, additional copies of the
bicycle grid at no less than LOS C as defined in Figure 3. worksheet may be utilized .
The project must be directly connected to all priority If applicable, developers may meet bicycle LOS standards by
destinations located within a quarter mile (1 ,320') of any edge of voluntarily providing off-site improvements to achieve minimum
the project boundaries. conditions. Such off-site improvements, however, are not exactions
imposed by the City but rather are voluntary actions taken by the
Priority destinations include all "priority destination areas" located developer, at its sole option, to accelerate the attainment of minimum
within a quarter-mile (1 ,320') of outside edges of the project site. LOS conditions for the project site . The costs of such off-site
Three types of destinations should be identified : improvements shall not be credited by the City against any financial
obligations for which the developer may otherwise be responsible
"public school sites" -- These include any existing public schools (such as Street Oversizing or Transportation Impact Fee).
(K-12) as well as any sites designated by the School District for
future public schools. "Directly connected " shall mean the project site is penetrated by the
bicycle facility; or the bicycle facility runs immediately adjacent to
• "recreation sites" These include public parks, sports the property and is not separated from it by any significant barriers;
facilities, public tennis courts and other sites where the public or the bicycle facility runs perpendicular to the property edge and is
would be expected to go to participate in physical recreation and readily accessible from the property with no significant barriers.
sports activities.
Bicycle facilities which are not consistent with the City's minimum
"community and neighborhood commercial centers" -- These are design standards shall not be considered in arriving at bicycle LOS
designated on the City Structure Plan map and are shown on the using the worksheet in Figure 7.
pedestrian map in Appendix A.
Explanation of the letter grades for bicycle LOS are found in Figure 3
Figure 7 provides a worksheet which is to be used to compare actual on page 10 of this Manual .
bicycle connectivity conditions with the minimum standard and, if
applicable, with a future condition once improvements have been
made.
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 20
LOS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle
Figure 7 . Bicycle LOS Worksheet
level of service - connectivity
m11nnmi 7
cl7 F7
base connectivity : C
specific connections to priority sites :
description of applicable destination area
destination area within 1 ,320' classification
including address (see text)
U
E21
�J
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 21
LOS Standards for Development Review - Motor Vehicle
Motor Vehicle LOS Standards for Development Review standard for signalized arterial intersections . The standard for
arterial intersections on commercial corridors and within activity
The facility-based motor vehicle LOS standards shown in Figure 4 centers is LOS E. (Arterial intersections are the intersection of an
represent city-wide level of service standards. They are based on arterial roadway with another arterial or a collector.)
"volume/capacity" calculations prepared in connection with traffic
modeling of future land uses and roadway networks. Figure 8 below provides intersection LOS standards for use in
development review. Development projects which will generate
In development review, projects will be evaluated based on a detailed traffic causing intersections to fall below these standards will be
analysis of intersections and links in a manner consistent with the 1985 regarded as "significantly impacting a study intersection." In these
Highway Capacity Manual . The procedure and requirements for this cases, mitigation measures must be evaluated in cooperation with the
analysis are described in detail in the Transportation Impact Study City as outlined in the Transportation Impact Study Guidelines.
Guidelines. They are summarized here.
The City has also identified certain corridors and roadways as either
Transportation Impact Study Guidelines "constrained " or "backlogged " (see page 12 for definitions of these
terms) . Projects which significantly impact such corridors and
The Transportation Impact Analysis will determine if a facilities will also be required to provide appropriate mitigation .
proposed development project will create any significant
impacts at the study intersections and on roadways surrounding Figure 8. Motor Vehicle LOS -- Study Intersections
the project site. In order to determine this, peak hour levels of
service at each of the study intersections will be evaluated for land use ( from structure plan )
each of the following scenarios:
"her Corridor% Within
• existing conditions; intersection - - , I %Luflw Lnwpensity AllOi �- "'
• existing conditions plus site generated traffic; . . ['hatricts Mixed Are,.
type
• short range conditions (3 - 5 years); and, Rw,dent ai
• long range conditions (10 - 15 years). Signaii/ed D E * D D
Intersections
The level of service evaluation for each of these traffic
Stop Sign Control N/A E * E * E
scenarios should include estimates of the percentage distribution (arterial / local )
of person trips among the modes of travel.
Step Sign control N/ A � C C
Motor vehicle LOS analysis should be conducted for StopSigrContr
intersections located within one-half mile of the project site . • Intersections falling below LOS E will require identification of
The City Traffic Engineer may require analysis of additional specific strategies for ntitigationofcongestion through altemativv<
intersections. The City has established LOS D as the general to motor vehicle travel.
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 22
LOS Standards for Development Review - Motor Vehicle
Relationship to Street Oversizing Fee
(For a detailed explanation of the Street Oversizing Fee, see Section
24- 111 to 24-121 of the Fort Collins City Code, or contact the City's
Director of Engineering).
Street oversizing fees are collected prior to the issuance of building
permits . These fees are coordinated with the City's overall
Transportation Level of Service standards and with its capital
improvements planning.
Proposed developments which would not meet Motor Vehicle LOS
standards without additional investment in roadway infrastructure
must be evaluated in light of the City's Street Oversizing Fee
provisions. For such projects, the relationships between LOS
standards and the Street Oversizing Fee Program, including the
anticipated sharing of costs for roadway investments and the timing
of such improvements, should be established as part of early review
and should be explicitly addressed at the Initial Scoping Meeting.
In some instances, the City will participate through the street
oversizing program in funding the street improvements to be
constructed in connection with the development. This will be
determined on a case-by-case basis according to the criteria in City
Code Section 24-111 to 24-121 .
In all cases, however, the developer will be expected to pay the
City's street oversizing fee and all other applicable fees as required
by City ordinances.
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Appendix A
Pedestrian Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Fort Collins Pedestrian Levels of Service
A ' 8 ' C ' D F F
Directness Excellent and direct Excellent and direct Minimum acceptable Increasing lack of poor directness and too directness or
connectivity through full c�onnectivity with clear directness and directness, connectivity toone.ctivity. Pedestrians connectivity. Total
utiliration of urban ffnear and visual connectivity standard. and linearly with perceplinn of a linear pedestrian disorientalion,
space, streets, transit, connection to transit Perceptions and urban incoherent and connection In desired no linearity and
confusing
activity centers wills clear facilities, siceels and spare become less contusing direction and destination falters and B
linear visual statements. activities. coherent wills the visual connection to serves only the person
he innings of discomfnn pedestrian destinations. with no other choice.
wills visual clarity and
lack of linearity.
WM Ratio < 1 .21' (AIM Ratio 1 .2 to 1 . V WM Ratio 1 . 4 to 1 .61' (AIM Ratio 1 .61n 1 .610 1MM Ratio 1 .8 to 2.0)' IAIM Ratio > 2.01'
Pedestrian sidewalk Continuous stretches of Continuous stretches of pedestrian corridors are Significant breaks in Complete breakdown in
Corllinolly sidewalks which ma erlesuian traffic flow as
appears as a single enlist Sidewalks which air. Y not well amneclpJ with continuity. P
wills a ma'or activil area pph sicall se arated b a have variable widths, several breaches In file each pedestrian selects a
or public open space. landscaped parkway. y with and without pedestrian network. different route as no
landscaped parkways- pedestrian network exists.
Signals ' 3 or fewer lanes to cross; 4 or 5 lanes to cross; 6 or more lanes In cross; Missing 5 elements of A Missing 6 elements or A Missing 7 elements of A
signal has clear vehicular signal has t:Irar vehicular signal has clear vehicular Missing 4 elements of B Missing 5 elements of B Missing 6 elements of 8
and pedestrian and pedesvian and pedestrian
indications, indications, indications, Missing 1 elements of C Missing 4 elements of C Missing 5 elements of C
well marked crosswalks: well marked crosswalks: well-marked crosswalks;
good lighting levels; good lighting levels; goon lighting levels;
pedestrian refuge area: pedestrian refuge area:
raised medians at least 6' raised median at least 6'
wide with low plantings wide with low plantings
or features; or features;
standard curb ramps; standard curb ramps; standard curb ramps;
automatic pedestrian automatic pedestrian automatic pedestrian
signal phase; signal phase; signal phase;
amenilies, signing, amenities, sig�ning amenities, signmg,
sidewalk, and roadway sidewalk, anti roadway sidewalk, and roadway
character strongly suggest character strongly suggest character strongly suggest
the presence o a the presence o a the presence o a
pedestrian crossing; pedestrian crossing; pedestrian crossing;
drivers and pedestrians drivers and pedestrians drivers and pedestrians
have unobstructed views have unobstructed views have unobstructed views
of each other. of each other, of each other.
Missing 2 elements of A Missing 4 elements of A
Missing 2 elements of B
Unsi&nalized, 3 of fewer lanes to cross; r 4 or 5 lanes to cross; 6 or mate lanes to cross; Missing 3 elements of A Missing 4 elements of A Missing 5 elements of A
crossm the major Missing 4 elements of B
streets �� Well marked crosswalks; Weil marked crosswalks; Well-marked crosswalks; Missing 1 elements of B Missing 3 elements of B 8
good lighting levels; good lighting levels; good lighting levels; Missing 1 element of C Missing 2 elements of C Missing 3 elements of C
pedestrian refuge area: pedesuian refuge area:
raised median at least 6' raised median at least 6'
wide with low plantings wide with low plantings
of features; of features;
standard curb ramps; standard curb ramps; standard curb ramps;
amenities, sigRning, amenities, $I. rung, amenities, sigdning,
sidewalt: an if roadv'al' sidewalk. Anil rnad.vav sidewalk, an rnadwav
Icharacter strongly suggest character strongly suggest character str .ongly suggest I
thepresence of a the presence of a the presence of a
amenities, signing, amenities, si�rung, I amenities, sistrung
e 'drwalp w and roaday eidewalk, an rnadwav sidewalk, an _ rnarLvav
character strongly suggest character strongly suggest character strongly suggest
the presence o a the presence o a the presence o a
pedestrian crossing; pedestrian crossing; �; pedestrian trussing;
drivers and pedestrians drivers and pedestrians driven and pedestrians
have unobstructed views have unobstructed views have unobstructed views
of each aher. of each other, of each other.
Missing 1 element of A Missing 2 elements of A
Missing I element of B
Unsignalized Well marked crosswalks; Missing I element of A Missing 2 elements of A Missing 3 elements of A Missing 4 elements of A Missing 5 elements of A
crosnm fthe minor
street good lighting levels;
standard curb ramps;
amenities, signing,
sidewalk, and roadway
character strnnfly suggest
the presence cr a
pedestrian crossing;
drivers and pedestrians
have unobstructed views
of each other.
Mid-block major 3 or (ewer lanes to cross; 4 or 5 lanes to cross; 6 or more lanes to cross; Missing 3 elements of A Missing 4 elements of A Missing 5 elements of A
street crossing• • •
Raised median at least Raised median at least Missing 2 elements of 8 Missing 3 elements of B Missing 4 elements of B
10' wide with low 10' wide Willi low
plantings or features; plantings or features; Missing 1 element of C Missing 2 elements o( C Missing 3 elements of C
amenities, signing and amenities, signing and amenities, signing and
sidewalk and roadway sidewalk and roadway sidewalk and roadway
character strongly suggest character strongly suggest character strongly suggest
the presence o a the presence o a the presence nlla
pedestrian crossing; pedestrian crossing; pedestrian crossing;
trivets and pedestrian, drivers and pedestrians drivers and pedestrians
hive UnoF�strucled views have unobstructed views have unobstructed views
o eachh of er. of each other, of each other.
well marked crosswalks; well marked crosswalks; well marked crosswalks;
good lighting levels; good lighting levels; good lighting levels;
standard curb ramps. standard curb ramps. standard curb ramps.
Missing 1 element of A Missing 2 elements of A
Missing I element of B
Visual interest and Vhually apprallnA and Generous sidewalks, Funttlonally operanonal De Igo Ignore Cnnfnn and ronven .Mee T.,ul dlscnmfort and
Amenity coinp atlble with lout visual clarhy some street will, less Importance In pe3esuian wnl, negative non existent, design 1,as inlimidaGon.
arch Lecture. Generous furniture anrf visual interest or amenity, mental image. overlooked needs of users.
sidewalk width, active landscaping, no blank
building frontages, street walls.
pedestrian lighting, street
trees and quality street
furniture.
Security Sense of security Good lighiing levels and Unobstructed lines of Sidewalk configuration Major breaches in Slleetscape is pedestrian
enhanced by presence of unobslructedglines of sight. and parked cars may pedestoan visibility from intolerant.
other people using sight. inhibil vigilance from street, adjacent land uses
sidewalks and the street. and activities,
overlooking them from
adjacent buildings.
Good lighting and clear
sight hoes.
AN Ratio: Actual distance helwoen pedestrian origin/destination divided by minimum distance defined by a firth angle grid street system .
A signalized intersection LOS will go up one level of service with a dedicated pedestrian signal phase and/or a colored or textured crosswalk.
Unslgnalized crossing at intersection of major street (minor arterial to major anerial) and minor street (local, connector and collector).
� a
o me
' > a m
• i � o t
trwoddb
,
� 1
1
ZOO#*
T
0. o.
r
arr
M'M.YN C N
T� moo,
Appendix B
Public Transit Plan
Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
I
• CITY OF FORT COLLINS
' 2015 Transit System
ate_
Sol
_' T
.\ •ck "�" � � • off! y� •
r - ---• -
_ r
• _
I
1 • _
r
�i •�, _ _ _ • . -�� ILA-NAN
I Jr
f • _ i
may.._•-r. :...• t
Legend
Enhanced rawi Grrldor (7ianK) • �'_ �
• • • • Hlgh Frequency 7nnsK . . . .
feeder 7nnsK • -- - - - _— — 1
Urban Cra Kh Area filet Tosfat•
Aieet Center Line. s•af••rv•{ My
T
Appendix B
Bicycle Parking Recommendations
Design and Location Recommendations
Rack Selection - All bicycle racks are not created equal . There are many
styles to choose from , some of which are appropriate for a particular
situation , and some which are unsuitable or even harmful . For detailed
recommendations see the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle
Professional ' s Bicycle Parking Guidelines (APBP , 2002 , available at
www . bicycIinginfo . org / pdf/ bikepark . pdf) .
What works : Bicycle parking may be provided in floor- , wall - or ceiling -
mounted racks but they should meet these requirements :
Holds the bicycle frame , not just a wheel .
• Can be used with a U - shaped shackle lock .
• Accommodates a wide range of bicycle /wheel sizes and types .
Will not chip the paint of a bicycle that leans against it .
Does not have hazards , such as sharp edges .
' A good rack holds the
bicycle frame , and can
be used with a U - lock .
This is a popular one .
This is another popular rack ' 4 '
that holds the bicycle frame and + , +
can be used with a U - lock . CSU ,f
currently uses this style of rack .
What doesn 't work: Old fashioned
"wheelbender" racks that hold only r
t`. the bicycles wheel , and are
unsuitable for use with a U - shaped
shackle lock . Many cyclists will not
y
�. use a rack that only hold the wheel or
is unsuitable for a U - lock .
Finding a Good Location
To ensure that bicycle parking will be used , locations should be easy to
find , convenient to use , and secure enough to reasonably safeguard
against bicycle theft . Facilities can be located where cycles already
parked , or where recommended by bicycle advisory groups . Bicycle
parking on a sidewalk if front of your building a permit .
Short- Term Parking Recommendations
Short -term bicycle parking provides shoppers , customers , messengers
and other visitors who generally park for two hours or less a convenient
and readily accessible place to park bicycles . It should be located within
50 feet of the building entrance that cyclists use . Where there is more
than one building on a site , or where a building has more than one main
entrance , the parking must be distributed to serve all buildings or main
entrances . If more than 10 short - term spaces are required , at least 50
percent of the spaces should be covered .
Only locate bicycle racks on a sidewalk or path where there is adequate
clearance for pedestrian traffic . A rail or eyelets secured onto a building
wall can sometimes provide a place to lock a bicycle where it is out of the
way of traffic .
What works: Locate parking in visible and prominent locations - if
cyclists are unaware of the parking it won ' t be used .
What doesn 't work: Isolation - a bicycle rack that is visually or physically
isolated will not be used and is a target for thieves . A bike rack that is in
the way of pedestrian traffic or provides inadequate space to maneuver a
bicycle and its gear is also undesirable .
Recommendations for Long - Term Parking
Long - term bicycle parking provides employees , students , residents ,
commuters and others who stay at a site for several hours or more , a
secure and weather- protected place to store their bicycles . It should be
located on site or within 500 feet of the site . Daily bicycle commuters are
generally willing to walk a short distance , about one block , if they are
confident the parking is secure . The following are suitable options :
A locked room or area enclosed by a fence with a locked gate .
Within view or within 100 feet of an attendant or security guard .
• An area that is monitored by a security camera .
A location that is visible from employee work areas .
What works : Cyclists are more likely to park. where their bicycles are safe
and protected from weather . At least 50 percent of long -term bicycle
parking should be covered . Indoor storage is best . It is often possible to
find a secure room , or an area in a basement or under stairs . Bicycle
parking can use odd - shaped interior spaces that have few other
purposes . Wall - mounted racks are well suited to indoor storage . Locate in
well - lit areas because lighting increases security of property and personal
safety . In areas where security is in question or where there is limited
opportunity to provide weather protection , enclosed bike lockers are a
good solutions . Cyclists may pay a monthly fee to lease such lockers .
kk
Bicycle lockers are a good choice for secure bicycle storage .
Recommendations for Spacing And Site Standards
Each bicycle parking space should be easily accessible . Cyclists should be
able to securely lock their bicycles without undue inconvenience and their
bicycles should be reasonably safeguarded from intentional or accidental
damage . Consider the space that a rack full of bicycles will take up , not
just the rack itself. Also consider that cyclists require a sufficient pathway
in and out of the parking area .
Each parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle -
generally , allow for 2 - feet by 6 - feet for each bicycle parking space .
Provide an aisle at least 5 -feet wide behind all bicycle parking to allow
room for maneuvering - just as automobile drivers need additional space
to maneuver in and out of parking spaces .
What works : Staggered racks - some bicycle racks can be staggered on
1 7 - inch centers , allowing room for more bicycles to be parked .
What doesn 't work: Installing bicycle racks too close to a wall or too
close to each other . Improper rack installation can cut capacity as much
as 90 percent . Installing bicycle racks too close to car parking . Motorists
will seldom leave sufficient room for bicycles to park and maneuver if
bicycle parking is not sufficiently separated from car parking .
Covered Bicycle Parking
Prolonged exposure to rain can rust a bike ' s metal frame and
components and the sun ' s ultraviolet rays can deteriorate a bike ' s soft
seat and tires . Cyclists will appreciate weather- protected parking . The
cover must be permanent , should be designed to protect the bicycle from
rainfall , and be at least 7 - feet above the floor or ground .
. . ;� .-
3
• L
What works: Take advantage of existing overhangs or awnings as a
creative , low- cost way of providing some weather protection . If there is no
existing opportunity to provide cover , enclosed bicycle lockers may be
the best solution .
What doesn 't work : Partial cover or cover that is too high does not
protect bicycles from rain and sun nor does it protect cyclists from rain
when they are locking or unlocking their bicycle .
Recommendations for Shower and Changing Facilities
Commuters who bicycle or walk often arrive wet , muddy or sweaty .
Providing employees with a place to shower , change and store clothes
can encourage bicycle commuting . Such facilities also benefit employees
who exercise during breaks or may occasionally need to wash and change
clothes for other reasons . There are several ways that employers can
provide such facilities .
A shower and clothes lockers can be designed into new or
retrofitted buildings .
A shower and clothes lockers can sometimes be added to existing
restrooms . A single shower stall and space to change clothes
typically requires a six by four foot space .
• Several businesses located close together can establish shower and
changing facilities that are shared by employees at several
buildings .
• Employers can arrange to use showers and changing rooms at a
nearby recreation center or gym . This may require special
arrangements to access the facilities when they would otherwise be
closed .
Recommended Parking Signs
Signs serve several purposes . They let cyclists know you have bicycle
parking and that cyclists are valued customers . Signs also help cyclists
find the parking if it is not immediately visible . Signage can direct long -
term users , keeping short - term parking readily available . A sign should
be posted at the main building entrance , or other visible location , easily
identifiable by a cyclist . .
What works : Standard bicycle parking signs made of high - quality
materials .
What doesn 't work: Complicated signing schemes . If a complicated
signing scheme is needed to find your bicycle parking , you may need to
find a better location . Signs that discourage bicycling and signs
prohibiting bicycle parking when no alternative is available , only create
ill -will
For more information on the design , selection and installation of bicycle
parking and changing facilities see Browning ( 1999 ) , APBP ( 2002 ) and DfT
( 2003 ) . Below are some general recommendations .
Provide suitable bicycle parking where cyclists stop .
• Choose properly designed bicycle racks that support a bicycle ' s
frame and are secure .
• Locate bicycle parking where it is convenient to use , secure , visible ,
protected from weather , and has adequate clearance .
Provide well - protected , long -term bicycle parking for commuters ,
residents or anywhere else cyclists will leave a bicycle for several
hours . If possible , also provide showers and clothes lockers for
bicycle commuters .
• Do not locate bicycle racks where they are in the way of pedestrian
traffic .
i
ATTACHMENT
CityofFortCoilins Transportation Board
WooGary Thomas, Chair
May 31, 2008
Fort Collins Bicycle Plan 2008
Mayor Hutchinson and Members of City Council:
The Transportation Board reviewed the "Final Draft" of the 2008 City of Fort Collins
Bicycle Plan on May 21, 2008.
The Board voted unanimously to recommend adoption of the Plan subject to the
following upgrades and comments by the Board (in no particular order).
Structure of the narrative: In an effort to capture a sense of all the bicycle oriented
activities in the community, the narrative discusses City Plan elements such as future bike
trails and paths interchangeably with the efforts of other volunteer groups, for example
the work underway to establish a downtown velodrome. It is recommended that text
changes be made to annotate when the narrative reflects established city intent and when
it is just giving a"such as"example of other citizen work.
Enforcement commitment: It sounds like great progress is underway in building the
relationship of FC Bikes and other bike organizations with City Police Services, with the
downtown dismount enforcement being a recent example. However, in its own meeting
with Police Services, the Transportation Board learned that other more compelling issues
limits the ability of police officers to routinely enforce bike safety issues for both
bicyclists and motorist citywide. The Transportation Board hopes that City Council will
find ways to help the City Police Services expand their assistance in this area so they may
become an become an integral part of the plan supporting its education and enforcement
objectives. (As a side note, on Page 48 there is an unfortunate choice of words
"animosity toward police"that might be misunderstood as suggesting a lack of support
for the uniformed officers. A more affirmative phrase should be used.)
Advisory Committee: One specific community recommendation in the Bike Plan is to
establish a multi-disciplinary bicycle advisory committee. The Transportation Board is
concerned that having a separate board or committee to focus on just one aspect of
transportation would fragment the efforts and might actually lead to less coordination not
to mention redundant cost and effort by staff to keep separate groups informed and
involved. As a recommended alternative, the Transportation Board would be glad to
host such a bicycle advisory committee as a standing committee of the Board(with
participants from other organizations and the community in addition to T-Board
members) and to incorporate the committee's work into the overall mission of the T-
Board to seek multi-modal solutions to transportation needs.
Colorado State University: Integration of the city's efforts with those of CSU does not
seem to be fully explored in this draft. With University staff and student bicyclists being
an important segment of the biking population, and with the University's own police
function involved in bike safety, it seems like more coordination of effort between the
City and University would only stand to benefit all.
Economic Benefit: Broader support for the Plan might result if it articulated more of the
"business case" for this effort. In addition to the role that having a bicycle friendly
community can play in attracting residents and investment,there is also a direct economic
impact of the commerce surrounding the manufacture, sales and repairs of bikes and
associated equipment. Recently CSU hosted a national collegiate bike competition which
brought hundreds of out of town visitors as will other contemplated events. While the
Plan comments on the many lifestyle and environmental advantages of fostering travel by
bike, it would strengthened by documenting the economic return on investment in such
programs.
The Transportation Board followed the development of this Plan closely over the past
year along with the emergence of many new initiatives such as the Bike Co-op, the
Bicycle Lending Library, and the Safe Routes to School program as well as the
construction of the multi-use paths on the Mason Corridor and elsewhere. The
Transportation Planning staff, in particular the very enthusiastic Bicycle Coordinator
Dave Kemp and Senior Transportation Planner Denise Weston, are congratulated and
thanked for their tireless efforts on behalf of the community.
Thank you for your consideration. I would be happy to discuss this recommendation at
your convenience.
Sincerely yours,
Gary D. Thomas
Chair, Transportation Board
ATTACHMENT 3
=Meeting Page 6
Motion: Steen: 1 move that accept the Downtown River District Plan to Council with comments.
Second by Robert.
Discussion:
Jenkins: I am still concerned that it is overly auto-oriented. How do you get there?
Bracke: All of the sidewalks in the area are tied to the District.
McCauley: When I ride my bike downtown, I usually go down Mountain. With this,I would take
the bike trail. Like it or not, most people get to shops or restaurants by car. It is a necessary evil.
VanTatenhove: We haven't discussed the Bohemian Foundation's project several blocks away.
Vote: One dissenting vote. Motion carries.
son b. Bike Plan 1995 Plan.
estop
Update to the
]995 e Plan. Now titled"21108 Bicycle Plan"
After receiving feedback from the T-Board last year, there was a public outreach process,and
three new sections were added as a result:
• Economy
• Environment
• Community
Engineering recommendations:
Continue implementation of Hot List 1.
Pursue implementation of Hot List 11.
Identify&implement interim solutions.
Continue implementation of MSP.
Continue&improve maintenance of Priority Commuter Routes.
Improve signal detection loops.
Education&Encouragement Recommendations:
Maintain and improve existing programs.
Propose new,innovative programs& events.
Solicit more participation from various demographics.
Foster relationship between non-profits,advocacy,and community groups to build public/private
partnerships.
Enforcement Recommendations:
Work closely with Police Services to create innovative,proactive campaigns that foster the safety
of bicyclists,pedestrians,and motorists.
Bridge the gap of understanding between bicyclists and police offers by providing current and
consistent information on bicycling in Fort Collins.
Economic Recommendations:
Continue to support and encourage infrastructure development,bicycle sporting events,
recreational bicycling,and bicycle facilities.
Embrace and support the local bicycle culture and use this attribute as a tool to attract employers,
businesses, and visitors.
Environmental Recommendations:
Establish measure methods for environmental benefits of bicycling and provide this information
to the public and decision-makers.
DRAFT Regular Meeting Minutes Page 7
Transportation Board
May 21, 2008
Communes Recommendations:
Consider the formation of a Bicycle Advisory Committee(BAC)to discuss and plan for multiple
facets of bicycling in Fort Collins.
Support the development of a strategic plan to pursue the Platinum level designation with the
League of American Bicyclists.
Support the establishment of performance or evaluation measures for the bicycle program in Fort
Collins.
Maintain support for existing programs.
Improve the communication link between the general public, bicycle organizations, various City
departments, and political officials in a combined effort to implement the recommendations in the
2008 Bicycle Plan.
Bicycle and Transit Recommendations:
Expand opportunities for bicycle-transit linkage
Incorporate bicycle parking at transit stops/stations.
End-of-Trio Recommendations:
Improve and expand bicycle parking throughout the City of Fort Collins
Encourage installation of showers and changing facilities at end-of-trip locations.
Feedback:
Simonson: We are silver on the cusp of gold? What does it take to be Platinum?
Kemp: Davis,CA is Platinum and set the cap. Portland,OR is also Platinum. We applied for Gold and
it came back as Silver,but we were close.
Troxell: What are the standards?
Kemp:There are no definitive standards. Safe Routes to School is one good one. Safe bridges is
another. Miles of bike lanes,bike routes, paved bike trails,connectivity (north/south)on the Mason
Trail will help substantially. Expansion of our park trails is in our favor.
Frazier: It seems that the Bike Library is enjoying huge success.Do you have any demographics?
Kemp: Yes. We're getting everyone from families,to tourists, to the homeless checking them out. If
we see homeless people checking them out week after week,we set them up with a free bike from the
Co-op.We have 50 bikes in the library right now.
Frazier: Do you also direct people to other City services?
Kemp: Good idea.
Frazier: Do you involve young people in refurbishing the bikes?
Kemp: The fleet is refurbished by the Fort Collins Bike Co-op. People can donate their time and earn
a bike.
Robert: I want to compliment you and your team.You supported everything in the CityPlan as asked.
The census bureau says+/-2400 people in Fort Collins commute on bikes. How many are CSU
students?
Kemp: I was riding on Loomis yesterday and found myself in a bike posse of 15 bikes.We need a
better way to calculate the commuting population.
Robert: 1 would like to see Police Services buy into in the Plan. It would be a positive step toward
enforcement.
Thomas. I am really behind what you're doing. I like the plan of connectivity. You went from such
specificity to parts that seem to ramble. By adopting this,are we beholding Fort Collins to endorse
them(i.e. Velodrome,etc.)?
Kemp: To support an endeavor doesn't necessarily mean financial support or land,etc. I created a
video to help support an effort. From the Chy's perspective,to support their endeavors on the
peripheral.
l
DRAFT Regular Meeting Minutes Page 8
Transportation Board
May 21, 2008
Thomas: I was confused by what is our commitment.
Weston: Good point to clarify. Add the term"such as..."
Troxell: Refer also to other plans.
Thomas: I agree with Ed Robert about enforcement. We need to get the PD on board.
Troxell: That will be a hot button for Council. Making the community part of enforcement as well.
improving signage,education.
Kemp: I'm actually going to defend the Police Department here. They are being very cooperative. It
is a matter of education, staffing, and time. Peer influence is also improving.
Thomas: You said,"decrease animosity toward the Police."That came across negatively.
Weston: We'll change that.
Thomas: On parking, you address types of racks but don't present facts.Are we modifying the
County standards or just saying we wish we had it. What would a builder use?
Weston: They are recommendations above and beyond the Standards.We will make the clarification.
Thomas: Bike Advisory Committee. The T-Board is charge with all modes. Is that a duplication? It
seems redundant and unnecessary.
Kemp: The Transportation Board has always been supportive of bicycling. We are looking for a
group to focus on community needs. It would report to the T-Board quarterly and look for
recommendations,direction and to have issues sent to Council.
Thomas: Personal observation...I sit on DARTAC (working on transit issues). It feels toothless and
doesn't seem legitimate.
Frazier: The respectability issue is something we need to encourage through education.
Kemp: We are launching the Coexist"campaign. Images and tag lines will promote messages to
motorists and cyclists promoting respectability(The Right Hook; The Blinder;The Door Prize, Share
the Road).
VanTatenhove: Is Downtown Fort Collins the only location the Velodrome Association would
consider?
Weston: We will generalize that statement.
Robert: Chip Steiner(DBA)said he would find a place in the Downtown area.
Troxell: We might want to think about expanding the Plan to include personal alternative modes of
transportation (i.e. long boards, Segueways). Also, it seems that demonstrating economic health
improvement(i.e. component manufacturing/bike manufacturers)would drive us toward Platinum
status. Establish a baseline,mention what we already have. Also,highlight the partnership with CSU,
ASCSU,UniverCity, Mason Corridor to effect change.
Eybs: You mentioned reconstructing intersections, how about changing the ordinance to allow bikers
to move through the intersections.
Weston: We suggested researching the loops,not rebuilding the intersections.
Johnson: Perhaps the group could report to the Board with a plan to reach Platinum level.
Weston: Since there isn't a checklist,it would be our recommendation that we reach that level.
Motion: Robert 1 move that we recommend Council adoption of the Bicycle Plan with the
modifications discussed tonight. Seconded by Steen. Passed unanimously.
8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
Simonson. Tested the Mason bus being cons' ery nice,wouldn't want to drive one.
Came from the Police. oday...we're fortunate to have them. They are
outstandi
McCauley: ri.
Lu No report.
anTatenhove: I won't be at the next meeting because I'm getting married the third week in June.
Community Planning and Environmental Services
Natural Resources Department
City of Fort Collins
MINUTES
AIR QUALITY ADVISORY BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
DATE: 1dg cto ��7
LOCATION: 0 est ountam— mte A—Conference room.
TIME: 5:30 -8:00 P.M.
For Reference: Eric Levine, Chair - 493-6341
David Roy,Council Liaison - 407-7393
Brian Woodruff, Staff Liaison - 221-6604
Board Members Present: Eric Levine, Jeff Engell,Dale Adamy,;1efttrich
ip Cam y York,
00000
Board Members Absent : Dennis Georg,Greg McMaster,D
Guests: Mike Silverstein,Katrina Windbom,Ric ce
Staff Present
Brian Woodruff,Alexis ak
Meeting was called to at 5:30
APPRO NDAS FROM AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER MEETINGS
Dale y moved to approve the August 2007,and September 2007 AQAB meeting minutes.
K arroco seconded and both minutes were unanimously approved
OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Rick Price,president of the board of BikeFortCollins.org—handed out a pamphlet from his organization
and addressed the Air Quality Board. He came to the meeting to speak on behalf of BikeFortCollins.org
and stated the mission of his organization is to create a bike friendly culture and transportation system in
Fort Collins through education,outreach and advocacy.
Rick asked the board to:
I. Endorse the revised bike plan and send a recommendation to the Ft.Collins City Council to
accept it.
2. Form a bicycle advisory subcommittee with one member from each board to advise the
transportation board as outlined on the last /x page of the plan.
3. Ask that a task force be given a charge to complete a community bike plan by 2008
Rick Price also shared other recommendations the BikeFortCollins.org board made to the City Council.
The Council in turn recommended each advisory board be made aware of these recommendations:
1. Continue to seek a partnership using UniverCity Connections to afford better bicycle
transportation between and among CSU, downtown,the river district and the rest of the city.
1
200 West Mountain Avenue•P.O.Box 580•Fort Collins,CO 80522-0580•(970)221-6600
T
2. Investigate potential for bicycle-related tourism and recreational economic development
opportunities that are unique for this area and which may draw people to this area because of
bicycling.
3. Consider expanding the current bike plan to be a community plan instead of just a transportation
plan.
4. Go for a Platinum Level League of American Bicyclists Award.
5. Long-term school plan.
6. Create bicycle-friendly image for the city,including bicycle loan program for visitors to Fort
Collins.
7. Create bicycling tour opportunities.
8. Build a downtown velodrome and outreach-leaming center called LifeCycle Center.
In summary,Rick asked the Board to recommend the creation of a community bike plan that is more
comprehensive than the proposed bicycle transportation plan. Eric Levine pointed out that last month the
AQAB recommended$500,000 be allocated immediately for full implementation of bike plan. The
group discussed these recommendations,items that may be falling through the cracks such as bike path
paving,collaboration and coalition building,and working on behalf of the citizens.
OZONE: PLANNING HOW TO ATTAIN THE AIR QUALITY STANDARD
Mike Silverstein, from Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and Suzette Mallette,
from North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization presented an in-depth description of the
forthcoming effort to write a"State Implementation Plan"for ozone attainment.
Ozone 101:
1. The ozone molecule has three oxygen atoms. It forms naturally in the strato a and at ground
level as a result of human activities.
2. It's a good thing when high in atmosphere where it protects us from ul olet radiation,but not
in the troposphere(summertime smog)where human activities ere onditions that produce
ozone.
3. Ozone likes to form and break down rapidly.It reacts with ous pollutants and sunlight in a
continuous process.
4. If we can reduce CFCs(chlorofluorocarbons)the str pheric ozone layer can rebuild over time,
but it's a long process.
5. Ozone is a respiratory irritant and causes hea ssues and degradation of various materials such
as rubber,paint,plants,crops and trees.
There are two national ozone standards(1 and 8 hour). Exceeding these averages is unhealthy and
causes the USEPA to designate Fort C s as a non-attainment area.
1. The one-hour standard is 1 s per billion,one hour average (older and is being phased out)
2. The eight-hour standar ' 0 parts per billion,8-hour average. Any value over 80 is a public
health issue.
Mike showed a map a ozone non-attainment area,which includes Ft.Collins, some of Larimer and
Weld counties a Denver metro area down to Castle Rock and west to Rocky Flats.There are
several monit g sites within this area which recorded marginal ozone levels this past summer and one
that violat a 8-hour standard. As a result,the EPA will again designate Northeastern Colorado in
non-a ' ent for 2007. Fort Collins'monitoring sites are consistently higher than average for ozone
le ve onitoring results show th1tt during hot weather the highest concentrations are by the foothills
e hot air rises against the foothills and stagnates.
L
]
EPA is reviewing the ozone standard and has proposed to make it more stringent. They reco a
primary standard at a level between .08 ppm and.06 ppm,maintained in an 8 hour averagin a over 3
years. CASAC recommends a secondary standard no greater than .07 ppb. USEPA ex to rule on
the new standard in March 2008 and to designate non-attainment areas by 2010-2011 s will be due
2013-2014 with attainment required by 2015-2021. Governor Ritter's directive izes we have an
ozone issue here and has asked for proposals to reduce emissions in time for n summer's ozone
season. A work plan to achieve this is underway. Meetings and modeling begun. The plan will be
dratted and proposed to the AQCC by Sept 2008. The plan will contain ical analyses,additional
control measures, more oil and gas controls,area and mobile source trols,contingency measures,
maintenance plans for redesignation,and transportation emission gets,in order to attain the standard
by 2010.
Mike pointed out that ozone is a difficult pollutant to ze because half of our ozone comes from
natural sources. He also explained additional nona ent implications such as the region's image,the
region coordinating over next 30 yrs,general co ty of transportation plans and long term planning
for 20-30 yrs. Also,new and modified major ces will be subject to more stringent new source review
permitting requirements.
The Board discussed the necessity o ore stringent standards,the growing number of new sources of
ozone pollution from industry,es ially oil and gas wells,how to stay within attainment,EPA's
recommendation of a new ozo standard of 70-75 ppb and how to allocate allowable emissions
throughout the region. Mi ated that each transportation-planning region in the North Front Range
would plan its activities and these numbers in order to stay within their emission budgets despite
growth that may occ uzette Mallette pointed out that each sector would have to conform
independently, and ' any area does not conform,then the entire region would not pass the conformity
requirement,w ' can result in federal funds being withheld.
The Board o brainstormed ideas of programs that would be helpful to reduce ozone emissions such as
a vehicl spection program,bus lanes,light rail,reduction of driving in Fort Collins,technological
inno ns and how to fold it into a community improvement plan. They also discussed ways for the
Bo and city to weigh in on the process. Mike and Suzette suggested the Board could participate in
s eholder meetings and North Front Range MPO Council meetings and/or provide written comments to
e Colorado Air Quality Commission when the plan is proposed next year.
BICYCLE PLAN UPDATE
David(DK)Kemp,the FC Bikes Coordinator for the city,and Transportation Planner Denise Weston
gave a presentation on the proposed update of the Fort Collins Bicycle Plan.
In 1995 there was a bike plan developed by the Council based on the four E's-Engineering,Education,
Encouragement,and Enforcement. The plan was based on the following recommendations:
• Hire bicycle coordinator on city staff
• Expand city bike law enforcement program
• Adopt/amend city standards
• Adopt/amend city policies and plans
• Coordinate efforts on maintenance,signalization and parking
Over the past 11 years the following was implemented:
• Hired a bike coordinator
- - 3
• Expanded city bike law enforcement including respectful bicycling education and"be seen"
riding at night with lights program.
• Adopted the Larimer County Urban Streets Standards
• Adopted city policies recognizing it's a viable form of transportation
• $53.3 million in bike related projects
• Coordinated efforts on maintenance signalization and parking upgrade,but there are still bike-
parking issues, especially at the Lincoln center.
• Maintenance of bikeways trails and maintenance standards,includes method of making
complaints and reporting hazards in bike lanes at febike.com
• "Adopt a bikeway program"—Good citizen involvement to report problems on bikeways.
2007 Recommendations
• Engineering to link bikeways with activity centers, standards for high-quality facility,hot list for
implementation and coordination among city departments.
• Education/encouragement with a full-time bicycle coordinator focusing on youth,adults and
motorists
• Continuation of education campaigns and encouragement events.
• Enforcement to include expanding relationships between bicycle program and Police Services,
creation of"self-governed"enforcement concept using marketing to encourage peer influence on
"scoff laws."
• Bicycle and transit relationship including bicycle parking at transit stops and destination
locations,transporting bikes on busses and indoor long-term bike parking.
- Explore creation of bike advisory committee that embodies the community as a whole.
- Promotion of Bicycle-related tourism and conferences.
- UniverCity Connections exploring innovative programs.
- Bike lending—bicycle library.
- Tourism and conferences—how to draw people to town who ride bikes. Fort Collins is
the next big bike town.
The city has a"Hot List"of high-priority projects such as adding bike lanes,shared lanes,light actuation
or signals,and grade separation in specific areas in town. These are not all funded,however, there may
be something to do in the interim to make things safer.
Suggestions that have been heard so far:
- Interim low cost bicycle connectors to allow bicyclists to navigate when there is street work
- Pursue platinum level bicycle friendly community status with League of American Bicyclists
- Create an image and campaign for a bike-friendly place to work, live,and visit
- Build a downtown FC velodrome combined with a life-long learning center.
DK asked the Board how can the bike plan support the AQAB mission and would the board have an
interest in participating in a bicycle advisory committee to promote the objectives of the bike plan. The
Board discussed how riding a bike downtown is now part of the experience of going downtown and local
businesses should be aware of that, free bike parking in parking structures,more bike racks on street,
how Transfort is not a complete product or transportation solution,bike path connectivity issues and how
the north Fort Collins bike routes need to be improved.
AQAB board agreed to discuss possible participation in a bike advisory committee at the next meeting.
Downtown Development Authority -
November 8,2007
Page 3
'aaaaat� BIKE PLAN
David"DK"Kemp,the City's bicycle coordinator,gave a PowerPoint presentation of the new Fort Collins
Bicycle Plan. The recommendations of the updated bike plan are many,broadly categorized under the
headings engineering,education,encouragement,and enforcement. The goal is to gain Fort Collins
platinum designation as a biking community. Among the recommendations to help the City reach this goal
are to link bikeways with activity centers,continue educational campaigns and events,foster links and
relationship between the public and city departments,create a"self-governed"enforcement concept
through marketing endeavors and peer influence. Mr.Kemp explained that he felt the goals of the bike
program were complementary with the goals of the DDA. Mr.Atteber y emphasized that because there is
only one other city(Davis,California),in the country with a platinum designation,this could be a real
differentimor for Fort Collins.
i
ECONOMIC PROFILE INSERT
Mr.Steiner recommended that the Board,in conjunction with Beet Street,by an eight page insert in at
economic profile publication being produced by the Northern Colorado Economic Development
Corporation and Upstate Colorado,with the assistance of the Northern Colorado Business Repo trough
the DDA does not normally participate in such publications,Mr. Steiner argued that the ould make
an exception in this case because it is an opportune time to illustrate what a DDA can ace ish with TIF,
give exposure to Beet Street,and give counterweight to a heavy emphasis on other are Northern
Colorado. The target audience is Chambers of Commerce,reel estate agencies,con ion and visitors'
bureaus and participating advertisers. It can be used as a mailer or inseRed into cation packages. Beet
Street hopes to use it as background information in development requests an draising efforts. Copy for
the insert would be provided by DDA and we would have input on the res the publication. We would
receive copies of the publication and an overrun of the insert to haul o s needed. Ms.Rennels felt it was
a good way to explain what TIP does and how it can finance great c" s. Ms.Jordan pointed out that with
a quality publication this goal could be accomplished in an attra way.
Moved by Mr.Keiffer;seconded by Ms.Spencer:To a ve the expenditure of S18,000($9,000
from DDA,$9,000 from Beet Street)to pay for an 8 e insert In the economic profile publication,
contingent on us providing the written content or ling what is written. The motion passed
unanimously.
DDA BYLAWS AMENDMENT
The amendments reflect several Chang the bylaws. It incorporates the earlier resolution to change the
Board membership from 9 to I I m rs and"include a member of the Larirner County Board of
Commissioners;to reflect contrac licy;and,to establish officer elections in the month of May to begin
terms in June. There are also e'grammatical and gender specific word changes.
Moved by Mr.Taylor; onded by Ms.Jordan: To approve the amendments to the bylaws of the
Downtown Develop Authority. The motion passed unanimously.
Ms Liley offere tendly amendment to alter the wording to Article 5,Section 5A 10,change the last
sentence to re 'such contract funds approved by the Executive Director,have been previously
budgeted.. he friendly amendment was accepted by the Board. i
SAL AX REPORT
Ch Seest announced that the September sales reflected in the October sales tax collections increased by
/o downtown and 3.6%citywide. This shows a year-to-date increase of 3.60/6 downtown and 4.8%for
City as a whole. The City financial planning for 2008 is based on a modest 2%increase in sales tax
collections.
1
Economic Advisory Commission
Minutes
November 7,2007
Agenda Item 3—Open Discussion, Public Comment &
Agenda Item 4— Fort Collins Bike Plan Update by David Kemp and Denise Weston
City Council has request that all Boards and Commissions be presented with the current
Bike Plan by David Kemp the City Bike Coordinator. Denise Weston, a City
Transportation Planner,was also present to answer questions of commission feedback
and ideas.
I
s '.
S
a �
The EAC discussed and exchanged ideas related to page 54-55 of the Bike Plan;
"The City should investigate the potential for bicycle related tourism and recreational
economic development opportunities that are based on the unique experiences that Fort
Collins and the surrounding area offer visitors and residents. This information will help to
understand what factors attract those individuals or businesses that are considering a
move to Fort Collins:"
http:/,'www.fegov.com/3icyclinWpdf/bike plan-update.pdf
The EAC plans to create a Bike Plan position statement to recommend to Council
considering the establishment of a Bicycling Advisory Committee that can help narrow
down the fiscal impact of bicycling in Fort Collins.
Agenda Item 6—Discuss next meeting time,location and agenda
The consensus of the commission is to meet the fir o every month at 11:00.
Postings of all Economic Adv' n meetings can also be found at the City of
Fort Collins ge event calendar htty://www.fceov.com
mg is scheduled for December 12, 2007
I
Natural Resources Advisory Board
Mnutes
November 28,2007
• Working on stormwater educational website.
• Adopt a water week program.
• Developed discharge detection program for municipa oyees which includes a
spill tree with instructions of what to do when ee it,plus phone numbers.
Ryan Staychock asked if stormwater polluti in drains increases in potency when there is less
water in the river and,if so, would eservoir be a potential problem because of less water
in the river. Susan responded ' pollutants in the river exceed the water quality standards,we
would have to find way uce pollutants. She told the group the Poudre River Monitoring
Group which me t. Collins has done sampling along the river, along with the waste water
treatment
offered to share the new permit with the NRAB when it is ready, and if the group has any
input, she would like to hear it.
Bike Plan Update—Denise Weston and David Kemp
Denise stated the City put out a Bicycle Plan in 1995 and encouraged the NRAB to read the
entire Bike Plan on the city's website. Her presentation tonight was to highlight the 2007
updates to the Bike Plan and the suggestions they have gotten to date from the various Fort
Collins boards and commissions.
The Bike Plan focuses on the Four E's
• Engineering
o Linking the bikeways with activity centers.
o Improving the standards for high-quality facilities.
o Has a Hot list It for implementation.
o Coordination among the City Deparments.
• Education
o Full-time bicycle coordinator focusing on youth,adults and motorists.
o Special events, education campaigns and encouragement events.
• Encouragement
o Creation of public,private and NPO partnerships.
o Fostering relationships between the city departments and the public.
o Continuation of education and encouragement events.
• Enforcement
o Expand relationships between bicycle program and police services.
o Creation of"self-governed"enforcement concept through marketing endeavors.
and peer influence so both bicyclists and pedestrians know the rules.
• 2007 recommendations to improve bicycle and transit
o Improving town bike parking long term.
o Making sure all transit destinations have bike parking.
o The Mason corridor busses will have space on interior of busses.
6
I
o Greatest benefit will be a community-wide bicycle program and a bicycle advisory
committee—not an advisory board—more like a task force.
• Hot List II—lists maintenance/construction of various large projects around the city that
need to be addressed.
o Created by a citizen group
o No current funding for these projects,but are being designated so they would be
ready to go when funding becomes available.
The group discussed why the bike plan should designate projects that have no funding without
completion dates,unsafe biking practices such as running traffic lights, the possibility of
removing one parking lane on 2-parking lane streets to allow a bike lane when none exists on the
street and more signage to"share the road".
• Suggestions to date:
o Pursue platinum level bicycle friendly status with League of American Bicyclists.
o Create image and campaign of a bike friendly place to live work and visit from the
environmental, economic and quality of life standpoints.
o Expand hot list II to include interim solutions and far reaching visions.
o Make sure bike plan addresses cyclists of all ages and levels.
o Emphasize mix of all transportation modes.
o Address continuity by eliminating or signing abrupt endings of bike facilties.
o Evaluate economic benefits/costs of a bike friendly community and use it as an
economic development tool.
o Emphasize safety as a priority of the bike plan.
o Use bike level of service as measurement tool.
o Including bicycle facilities in the City's way-finding study.
o Build a downtown velodrome(Board discussed this should be a private venture,
not a city facility).
o Identify and increase bicycle parking downtown.
o Additional bicycling education enforcement downtown.
Denise pointed out that a goal is to make sure the bike plan encourages economic development in
the City of Fort Collins. The group discussed promoting higher echelon specialty biking
activities and noteworthy bike races, how the Bike Plan should address how bicycling positively
effects the environment and how bike lending could negatively affect local bike sales/repair
businesses.
Denise encouraged the NRAB to email her any further input on the Bike Plan. She announced
there will be a public meeting in December to present the Bike plan. The Transportation Board
will be approving the plan in January,and it will go to the City Council for final approval in
February.
7
PA40MAND JR�A`PION li16AkD
Misastes of Re{riittl'Meeting
Novetsber 28,2007
215 N"Mason S*vtt
5:30 p.ns.
Council Liaison: Kelly Ohlson Staff Liaison: Craig Foreman,221-6618
President: Michael Chalona Phone: 490-2335 (home)472-8954(work)
Call Meeting to Order: Michael called the meeting to order at 5:37 p.m.
Agenda Review: No changes to the Agenda as printed.
Citizen Participation: None
Approval of Minutes: On a motion made by Bill seconded by Cathy the Board approved the September 26,
2007 Minutes: 8:0
Bicycle Plan Update: Denise Weston, Transportation—Presenter
In 1995 a Bicycle Plan was instigated, now in 2007 we're recommending updates to the Plan, to bring the City
of Fort Collins to the "Platinum Level".
D.K. Kemp is the full-time Bike Coordinator for the City. He is working on a plan that respects both sides,the
motorists and the bicyclist. He is working on a`Be Seen"campaign, coordinating with CSU to help educate
the students on bicycle safety and to increase bicycle parking. He is also establishing a Bike Advisory
Committee teaming with community members and City departments to bring about awareness and a multi-
faceted program where both motorists and bicyclist comply with, and understand, the laws. The idea of the
Bicycle Plan is to bring a level of respect within the community both from bicyclers and drivers.
There will be a new bike map coming out very soon. It shows all the trails and bike paths. There will also be a
"Bike to the Lights"open house on Tuesday, Dec 11 from 4pm-6pm at the Gardens on Spring Creek.
For more information, or to review the presentation made by Denise Weston, please see the attached power
point presentation.
Cultural Facilities Plan Update: Jill Stilwell, Cultural Services &Facilities Director
We have never had a Cultural Facilities Plan. This will be our first attempt at a an. We are
presenting to various Boards first to get some feedback, and then z69"woVosenting to the community. Our
goal is to have a Cultural Facilities Plan in place by 1 08.
When surveys are reviewed t in that what makes a city"Best Place to Live"is the cultural activities
offered. People ry important to have art and culture available in their community. We feel that art
and cult part of the roots of Fort Collins.
YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES
Regular meeting—December 4,2007
7:00 p.m.
Council Liaison: Lisa Poppaw Staff Liaison: Steve Budner,Recreation,221-6861
Board Chairperson: Man Strauch
Board Members Present: Lee Swanson, Scott Umbreit,Matt Strauch, Joshua Disney, Erin Rooney,
Laura Lamb
Board Member(s) Absent: Kai Stuckey
I
Staff Members Present: Steve Budner,Administrator—Recreation Department
Carol Fahring,Staff Support—Recreation Department
Guest(s) Present: David Kemp, Bicycle Coordinator
Call meeting to Order:
The regular meeting of the Youth Advisory Board was called to ord t 6:02 p.m. by Board chairperson
Matt Strauch.
Approval of Minutes from November 7, 2007:
On a motion by Lee and seconded by Erin,the minut ere approved unanimously.
(6-0).
Agenda Review:
Other business was moved up in the ag ecause Laura needed to leave early. She contacted Walmart
about their building on S. College a its possible use as a youth facility. At present they are not renting
it and there are no plans for rental ' e future. it was decided that Steve would mention the building to
the RMT to keep it in the discu on.
A discussion was also h about switching the meeting time to 6 pm. Several staff members were unable
to arrive by 6 pm so cision was made to leave the meeting time at 7 pm.
The meeting fo ed a dinner with City management, City Council and ASCSU.AII members thought
the dinner w great in establishing better connections with the council and the city manager. Also they
were imp sed with the support shown by council for the Youth Advisory Board.
Ci . Participation:
e was no citizen participation.
Bicycle Plan Update—David (DK) Kemp:
The last bike plan was in 1985.There were 4 components: engineering, education, encouragement and
enforcement.The next bike plan started in 2006. Under the new bike plan:
- Engineering projects included linking bike lanes to activity centers,on road bike parking and
coordination between city departments.
- Education and Encouragment began with hiring a bike coordinator, David. There are many bike
events on the calendar such as bike week, fun bike events and bike winter. Smart Trips was a good
Youth Advisory Board Minutes
December 4,2007
Page 2
start in education. It just needed updating and refining. One area which needs targeting is child
obesity. There needs to be a different focus on both youth and adult bicyclists and motorists. A
major goal in education is to teach people to bike respectfully.This includes respecting the laws,
pedestrians and motorists.
In the past the major form of encouragement was to reward bike riders with coupons, etc. Now the focus
is on having fun bike events.
Bike Fort Collins and the FC Bike Coop, along with the city just received a CMAC grant to establish a
bike library. The purpose of the bike library is to have bikes at hotels and other facilities that the public
can use. It would be available for tourists to use or for the working citizenry to use for errands.
Another project is the Recycled Bike project. In the past all found bikes have been shipped out of state. If
we kept them,they could be used for the bike library,to give to the needy or for classes where students
could earn a bike. Bikes going to the landfill could be used for parts.
- Enforcement—There are not enough police officers to patrol bicyclists so it needs to be self-
governing. That is where education comes in. A few of the illegal bike maneuvers are: riding on the
sidewalks in Old Town,riding on College between Laurel and Harmony, and riding at night without a
light.
DK would like to start a Bicycle Advisory Committee in 2008 with members from many sources. Matt
attempted to get Josh to volunteer since he frequently rides a bike. However there was no word from Josh
on the matter.
How can the bike plan help kids? It gives them a safe way to access recreation facilities. It is important
for parents to model safe bike riding skills. To that end DK would like to offer some family biking
activities.
Chairman's report:
a. Restructuring finalization—Matt handed out a final copy of the restructuring plan. Eri ed
to accept it and Lee seconded the motion. It was approved on a vote of 5-0. 10
b. Review of Work Plan—Matt encouraged each member to visit a meet nother board or
read their minutes and then report back to YAB. The followin s were chosen:
Scott - Transportation
Lee—Affordable Housing
Erin—Natural Resources
Josh—Library
c. Annual Report Disc —Matt appointed Carol to review Janet's files and submit an annual
report to the office. It is due January 31.
The ne mg will be on Wednesday,January 2 at 7 pm in Activity room 3 at NACC. Carol will send
a er on Monday,December 31.
Senior Advisory Board
Minutes
November 14,2007
1. Call Meeting to Order
Marcia Richards, Chair, called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.
IL Attendance
Attendance taken
111. New Business
A. Suzanne Jarboe-Simpson facilitated the Board members in developing the 2008 Work Plan
Denise Weston, City of Fort Collins Transportation Planner, presented an update on the
city s Bicycle Plan. The Plan is comprehensive, including attention to engineering,
education, encouragement, and enforcement. A Bicycle Advisory Committee is to be
created and senior representation on the committee is encouraged. The SAB will
delay a decision regarding any involvement on this committee until the new board members
are appointed.
IV. Public Participation
Rick Price, on behalf of the board of directors of BikeFortCollins.org, encouraged the SAB
to support the city's Bike Plan. Building on the FC Bike Plan, BikeFortCollins proposes
to aim for the highest level award (platinum) given by the League of American Bicyclists
to recognize "Bicycle Friendly Cities". Rick requested that the SAB recommend to the
City Council that the City and appropriate city units engage fully in this process. The
SAB voted to write a letter to City Council in support of the project. Kathy Schuster is to
write the letter.
V. Approval of Minutes
Marjorie McTaggart commented that Fort Collins SAB had once initiated a Senior Hotli
similar to the one started by Loveland SAB, as noted in the minutes. The project wa
discontinued due to lack of use. Marjorie McTaggart made a motion to approve minutes of
the October 10, 2007 meeting. Bud Herin seconded the motion. The mot' arried.
Vl. Correspondence
A. Don Wells' letter of resignation from the SAB was prese Kathy Schuster will write
Don, acknowledging receipt of his letter and thanki in for his service on the board.
Marjorie McTaggart suggested that a copy of IN rrespondence be sent to the Mayor.
B. Other
Old Business
A. Liaison Reports
-Anita Basham :
The Nov. 2 eeting of the Transportation Board will be held off site at the new
Deten enter.
ections are currently being held for Senior Center Council members. Ballot boxes are
q
I
>>> "Bill Nesper" <BillNesper@bikeleague.org>9/19/2008 3:52 PM»> ATTACHMENT 4
Dear DK,
Congratulations! The League has renewed the Bicycle Friendly Community designation for
Fort Collins at the Gold level. This decision involved careful review of your application and
consultation with local cyclists.
Please share this with your partners in the city and advocacy community. The League will be
releasing a national press release on this on September 24th and looks to work with you to
help promote this accomplishment. Please hold your announcement of the award until
September 24th.
You will also be receiving feedback in a few weeks from the League of American Bicyclists on
what you can do to make Fort Collins more bicycle-friendly as well as your BFC road sign
and decals, and award certificate.
Your designation will be due for renewal in August of 2012. At that point your community
will be reevaluated so we urge you to make as many improvements as possible in the
meantime! Of course, if you wish to renew sooner than that please do. We look forward to
seeing the community's progress.
If you would like to dm an award ceremony, please let us know. We would love to work
together to promote this great achievement. Also, we would like to promote the community
on our website. We are asking you to review your community page on
http://www bikeleague org/programs/communities/ Please let us know if you have any
updated information or photos that you would like us to show.
Once again, accept our congratulations on your tremendous efforts to create a truly Bicycle
Friendly Community.
Sincerely,
Bill Nesper
Director, Bicycle Friendly Community Program
League of American Bicyclists
P: 202-822-1333
bill(o)bikeleague.org
2008 Bicycle Plan
"" "F �' F " I` Gold Level
61. n
FINAI DIAFT
City ° Pon Collins Designation
kpumOcr 2dJ0
• x by the
League of
American
Bicyclists
As of September
- 2008
1
2008 Bicycle Plan
( Update to the 1995 Program Plan )
Update Process ( 2007/2008 )
Public input
. City Boards and Commissions
. Bike Fort Collins
. Downtown Development Authority
Public
2
1
2008 Bicycle Plan
Engineering Education
Encouragement Enforcement
Economy
Environment
Community
3
jWWFc1trYf ollins
2008 Bicycle Plan
Engineering Recommendations
• Implement Hot List I / Hot List II .
• Implement Interim solutions .
• Implement Transportation Master .
• Maintain Priority Commuter Routes .
• Improve Signal detection loops .
• Promote innovative traffic solutions .
4
2
2008 Bicycle Plan
Multi - Modal Recommendations
• Expand bicycle—transit / bicycle - pedestrian
/ bicycle -auto linkage .
• Increase bicycle parking at transit stops , in
downtown , and throughout the City .
• Encourage end -of-trip facilities .
5
2008 Bicycle Plan
Education & Encouragement
• Promote innovative programs .
• Build public- private partnerships and
community relationships .
• Consider Cyclovias ( car-free events ) .
• Enhance wayfinding for bicyclists .
• Implement programs focused on safety .
6
3
2008 Bicycle Plan
Enforcement Recommendations
• Develop proactive campaigns/training
sessions with local enforcement agencies .
• Provide current & consistent information .
• Establish techniques for ha
events .
• Address bicycle theft/traffic- law evasion .
7
2008 Bicycle Plan
Economic Recommendations
• Support bicycle sporting events ,
recreational biking , and bicycle facilities .
• Promote bicycle culture to attract new
employers , residents , businesses , &
visitors .
• Encourage bicycle - related businesses and
manufacturers .
s
4
2008 Bicycle Plan
Environmental Recommendations
• Establish measurement methods for
environmental benefits .
• Coordinate with other City initiatives to
measure environmental benefits .
9
2008 Bicycle Plan
Community Recommendations
• Pursue formation of a Bicycle Advisory
Committee ( BAC ) .
• Pursue Platinum Level designation with the
League of American Bicyclists ( LAB ) .
• Establish performance measures for
bicycle programs and facilities .
10
5
2008 Bicycle Plan
Bicycle Advisory Committee
• Require public process to determine :
— Organizational Structure / Membership
— Relationship to Boards & Commissions
— Reporting h4enhan0
eme
t
— Committee Duration
— Mission , Goals , and Objectives
11
II : Bicycle Plan
lao MIME
(September 2008)
Subsequent to Adoption of 2008 Bicycle Plan - City Staff will Initiate Implementation
Bicycle Advisory
Committee
Implementation Implementation Implement ahon Implementation
Strategies Strategies Strategies Strategies
6
`ter,
SHARE THE
ROAD
l
RESOLUTION 2008-094
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ADOPTING THE 2008 BICYCLE PLAN
WHEREAS,the 2008 Bicycle Plan,dated September 2008 (the"Plan")has been developed
over the past several years with extensive public outreach and input from various City boards and
commissions, including the Air Quality Board, the Transportation Board, the Downtown
Development Authority, the Economic Advisory Commission, the Natural Resources Advisory
Board,the Parks and Recreation Board,the Senior Advisory Board and the Youth Advisory Board;
and
WHEREAS,this public outreach program has also included the involvement of"Bike Fort
Collins," UniverCity, a citizen advisory committee, and other local organizations, as well as the
general public; and
WHEREAS, the Plan presents existing conditions of the bicycle facilities within the City,
evaluates the City's accomplishments over the past 13 years, and proposes recommendations for
future bicycle facilities and programs; and
WHEREAS, the Plan articulates the vision for bicycling in Fort Collins and expands the
City's focus for bicycling beyond engineering, education, encouragement and enforcement, to
include: (1) the economy, by focusing upon tourism and bicycle related commercial development,
(2) the environment, by establishing methods of measuring environmental benefits, and (3) the
community,by involving the Bicycle Advisory Committee and by striving toward"platinum level"
designation with the League of American Bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interests of the City that
the Plan be adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS that the 2008 Bicycle Plan is hereby adopted.
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this 7th
day October, A.D. 2008.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Chief Deputy City Clerk