Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 05/01/2001 - SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 53, 2001, APPROPR AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM NUMBER: 7 DATE: May 1, 2001 FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL FROM: Tom McLellan SUBJECT: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 53, 2001, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the General Fund for Police Seizure Activity. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: State statutes specify that the proceeds from seizures are to be used for law enforcement purposes, and require that the governing body (City Council) of the seizing agency (Police Services) appropriate these proceeds to supplement the seizing agency's budget or forfeit the proceeds to the general fund of the State of Colorado. This Ordinance, which was unanimously adopted on First Reading on April 17, 2001, appropriates prior year reserves for police seizure activity. AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM NUMBER: 16 DATE: FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL April 17, 2001 STAFF: Tom McLellan SUBJECT: First Reading of Ordinance No. 53, 2001, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the General Fund for Police Seizure Activity. RECOMMENDATION: r- Staff and the statutory Forfeiture Committee recommend adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. kY -4 n FINANCIAL IMPACT: A, This Ordinance appropriates $38,026 into the Police_Services budget this combined with $4,454 previously appropriated for a total seizure fund budget of $142,480. This amount represents money awarded by the courts in 2000 and held in a General Fund restricted reserve account awaiting appropriation. Some of the funds will be used by Police Services for special purchases of training, services, and commodities to enhance 'the quality of customei'service. ThCremainder will be used in partnership with a variety of community groups'to fund prevention programs for youth, anti- violence, and diversity issues. EXECUTIVE SUMMq$Y: Nearly 100 years ago Colorado la created a,process for the seizure of illegal contraband used in ors gained from criminal activity .The.'intent is to deter crime and to have criminals help defray the costs of policing. State statutes specify that the proceeds from such seizures are to be used for law enforcement purposes;,^and require that the governing body (City Council) of the seizing agency (Police Service appropriate these proceeds to supplement the seizing agency's budget or forfeit the proceeds�o the general fund of the State of Colorado. The Colorado Supreme Court and United States Supreme , ourt ve consistently upheld the constitutionality of these statutes. Checks and Balances: Colorado statutes also create a Forfeiture Committee consisting of the Mayor, District Attorney and Chief of Police. The Committee oversees and approves the seizure budget and spending DATE: April 17,2001 1 2 1 ITEM NUMBER: 16 decisions made by the Chief of Police. The local Forfeiture Committee met on March 22, 200land approved the 2001 Seizure Fund budget. All seizures are approved in advance by the Commander of the Investigations Division. Seizures are based upon articulated probable cause, not mere suspicion. They are reviewed by the District Attorney's asset forfeiture specialist, and are always accompanied by criminal charges. H A judge approves each filing as demonstrating probable cause and being in com,�ppliance with the seizure statute. The defendant is served with a written notice, including aq_afficTaavit detailing the probable cause and a clear advisement of legal rights and procedures for exercising due process. The defendant is entitled to both a preliminary hearing on the criminal charges and a civil trial concerning the seizure and forfeiture action. Police Services maintains a detailed written directive concerning seizures, Which'requires close tracking and careful documentation. The Chief of Police is the only Fort Collins Police Services Officer with authority to spend the seizure funds, and actions by the Chief of Police are'approved by the Forfeiture Committee. Staff is confident that it demonstrates exceptional care, responsibility, and fairness in these matters. The Larimer County District Courts have consistently upheld the activities of Fort Collins Police Services in seizing crime-related property whenever such seizures have been challenged in civil court proceedings. Two documents are attached. ,The firstis the"2000 Annual Seizure Fund Report," outlining the 2000 seizure fund expenditures and income ` The second document'shows the 2001 budget, which has been approved.by the Forfeiture Committee. This document shows a breakdown of anticipated expenditures for 2001, if the appropriation is approved by Council. ;I fit= .. 2