Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 05/24/2005 - SOUTHWEST ANNEXATION DATE: May 24, 2005 WORK SESSION ITEM STAFF: Cameron Gloss FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Southwest Annexation. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Should the City further pursue the Southwest Annexation at this time? 2. If there is support for continuing to pursue the annexation, should the area be annexed in phases? 3. If there is support for phasing the annexation, when should the final phase be annexed? 4. Is there additional information the City Council would need prior to formal consideration of the annexation request? NOTE: Much of the following information was provided to City Council in advance of the previous worksession held on February 22, 2005. The primary purpose of the May 24, 2005 worksession is to give necessary background information to the Mayor and new Council members and to follow-up on questions raised during the previous Council discussion. Areas of specific substantive change are noted within the AIS and attachments in bold. ANNEXATION POLICY & REGULATIONS The City of Fort Collins and Latimer County, through an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA), defined the Fort Collins Growth Management Area (GMA). Over time, the City will annex land area outside the current city limits and within the GMA. The GMA will become developed and urbanized. Under the IGA and adopted City Plan policy, the City has agreed to pursue annexation of enclaves as they become eligible. Enclave Annexations are subject to the requirements of Section 31-12-106 of the Colorado Revised Statutes. When any unincorporated area is entirely surrounded by land within the city's jurisdiction for at least three years, the city may annex the area without the consent of area property owners. Under the State statute, enclave annexations are subject to relatively limited public notice requirements and are exempt from the public hearing requirements applicable to voluntary annexations. BACKGROUND ON THE SOUTHWEST ANNEXATION Annexation of the Coyote Ridge Natural Area in November 2001 completed the encirclement of an "enclave" of land that the City of Fort Collins may annex after three years have passed since the annexation date. The area is generally bordered on the north by Harmony Road, the south by Trilby Road, South Taft Hill Road on the west, extending 1/4 mile east South College Avenue on May 24, 2005 Page 2 the east. This potential annexation area, referred to as the Southwest Annexation, is unprecedented in its size, encompassing approximately 2 3/4 square miles in area. Public Review Process During the summer of 2004, City staff conducted seven neighborhood meetings to elicit feedback from property owners and residents within the southwest enclave. The meetings were well attended, with more than 50 residents at most of the sessions. In conjunction with the neighborhood meetings, a web page was created that provided written summaries of citizen questions and comments and staff responses raised at each neighborhood meeting and, some cases, accompanying Powerpoint presentations. In addition, the web page features a property tax calculator allowing residents to determine the difference between County and City tax rates. The City Council conducted a worksession on February 22, 2005. At that meeting, the majority of Council members expressed support for considering a phased approach to annexation, with emphasis on annexing the properties fronting on South College Avenue as the first phase. Should the City Council elect to continue pursuing the annexation, staff anticipates the following public hearing schedule: July 5, 2005 City Council Initiating Resolution of the Annexation Ordinance July 21, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing August 16, 2005 City Council Annexation Ordinance 1st Reading September 6, 2005 City Council Annexation Ordinance 2nd Reading Impacts to Property Owners/Citizen Concerns Throughout the public process, citizens have voiced strong opposition to the annexation. Concerns have ranged from direct, increased costs, e.g. - monthly stormwater utility fees and the electric utility service rights fee to a perceived fear that their present way of life will be dramatically altered under City regulations. While much of the area could be characterized as suburban, portions have a semi-rural feel with horse boarding and livestock operations occurring on some of the properties. In general, owners of commercially-zoned properties have expressed fewer concerns than the residential property owners. Most of the impacts to commercial owners relate to more stringent City sign regulations and monthly stormwater fees, although some business owners have stated a concern over the loss of their perceived competitive advantage over City businesses currently within the city limits due to the collection of City sales tax. Enclave residents and property owners have expressed the following top five perceived negative impacts. A more detailed matrix describing the financial and regulatory impacts of the annexation on area property owners is shown in Attachment 3. • Electric Utility service recovery fees and loss of PVREA Capital Credits; • Stormwater Utility Fees; May 24, 2005 Page 3 • Local Streets- On-going maintenance and potential future improvements; • More Restrictive City Regulations, particularly with respect to the discharge of firearms, use of electric fences, and vehicle storage; and • Animal regulations. Electric Utility Service Rights Fees/Loss of Capital Credits When an area annexes to the City, the Fort Collins Electric Utility (FCU) is then authorized and required to transfer provision of electric service from Poudre Valley Rural Electric Authority (PVREA). This transfer will not occur at the time of annexation, but will take a period of time to accomplish. Several years ago, a state law was passed that requires municipal utilities to pay to REA a fee of 25% of each existing customer's monthly bill for a period of 10 years from the date of service transfer. This fee, officially known as the services rights fee, is commonly referred to as the "transfer fee". Any new customer within a transferred area that comes on the municipal system after the transfer of power, but before the end of the 10 year period, is required to pay a 5% fee for the remainder of the 10 year period. This 25% or 5% fee is added to the customer's monthly FCU bill, and then the City forwards that portion to REA. The 10 year clock in both instances starts at the time the electric service is transferred to FCU, NOT the date of the annexation. This means for example, that if a new customer within an annexed area is added to the FCU system 9 years after the annexed area was transferred from REA to FCU, that customer would have 5% added on their monthly electric bill for the 1 year that remains on the 10 year clock. There are no charges to customers to actually make the transfer of power. In the Southwest Enclave, approximately 1,100 customers would be transferred from PVREA and 100 from Xcel. Given the mandatory transfer fee and the lower electric rates the City charges, an "average" household currently with REA service that would use 700 kwh of electricity per month would pay an additional $1.94 per month based on current rates. After ten years, the customer would pay $10.17 less per month within the City vs. REA based on present rates. There is no provision in the City Code to waive or defer the electric transfer fee. In order for a waiver or deferral, the City Charter would have to be changed. The fees are required to be passed on to the City's electric customers by language contained in the City Code. Each rate schedule contains a clause the same as the one in the residential schedule found in Section 26-464(h) on pp. 1791-2 of the City Code. The City of Fort Collins is neither the first nor the only utility to pass along the service rights fee to a newly annexed area. Like Fort Collins, Colorado Springs Utilities passes on the full 25% charge to its customers for 10 years. Some communities absorb all or part of the service rights fees, often by spreading out the charges to their existing customers. Both the City of Loveland and City of Longmont assign a 5% service rights fee and finance the balance through customers. In addition to the 10-year transfer fee, PVREA members brought onto FCU service will no longer gain capital credits. Under the PVREA program, each member/consumer can potentially receive capital credits annually. Capital credits are payable when the board of directors of REA May 24, 2005 Page 4 determine that they have met the financial conditions of their loan agreements and that cash reserves are adequate. PVREA pays capital credits on a first-in, first-out, rotating basis. Stormwater Utility Fees The City collects monthly stormwater utility fees from all property owners within the city limits. Within the annexation area, on an "average" size lot 8,600 square feet, residential property owners could expect a monthly stormwater fee of $14.26. Commercial property owners pay considerably more due to greater building coverage and paved areas. Properties along the Kel- Mar strip subdivision, for example, would pay a stormwater fee of approximately $134 per month. The stormwater utility fees go toward flood control projects addressing regional drainage problems, culverts, cross pans, swales, open channels and more localized drainage issues. The fee also pays for floodplain regulation, improvements to water quality and administration of the stormwater program. Stormwater utility fees are determined based upon the size of parcel(s) and the relative amount of paving, buildings, and other impervious surfaces present. In cases where lots are much larger than the city average, as are many of the residential properties within the Southwest Enclave, fees are adjusted downward by the stormwater utility to more accurately represent the true amount of water runoff. City staff has completed the stormwater fee impact analysis for some of the large-lot subdivisions and commercial properties within the annexation area, but not for all properties. The City Code makes no provision to exempt properties from the stormwater utility fee except for roadways and utility rights-of-way. Local Streets-Future Improvements and Maintenance Virtually all of the local streets within the Southwest Enclave do not meet the City's adopted street standards relative to the street cross-section and level of roadway engineering. The area's local street pavement surfaces vary from gravel to chip sealed asphalt. The City will test a street's structural strength to determine if it meets City standards. If it meet s the standards, then the City would take over all maintenance responsibilities as long as it is safe for bicycles and pedestrians and it has proper drainage. However, since most streets in the annexation area cannot meet this standard, the City would only provide basic maintenance like pothole filling, minor crack sealing and slurry sealing. Grading of gravel roads would be completed two to three times per year. The City may use recycled asphalt in certain areas and add "road dust" to reduce dust impacts. Any needed maintenance beyond this level, which is roughly that presently provided by Latimer County, would fall to the local Home Owners Association until such time that the roads are brought up to City standards. The most likely way to improve local streets in the future that will meet City design and construction standards will be to form a Special Improvement District (SID). An SID is formed when the majority of affected property owners give their consent to its creation. It is one of the City's objectives to have a high percentage of owners willing to be part of a SID, but there may be instances where the City will push for its formation over the objections of some area property owners. Although the County would also require local residents to fund future street May 24, 2005 Page 5 reconstruction, many property owners within the enclave have expressed fears that creation of an SID will be forced on them without their consent and that future roadway improvement costs will not be affordable. More Restrictive City Regulations Many of the enclave residents have expressed concern regarding more restrictive City regulations and higher level of code enforcement that comes with annexation. Firearms cannot be discharged within the City limits. This has been an issue raised primarily with respect to the protection of livestock from conflicts with wild animals, such as cougars, and with some domestic animals. Existing electric fences can be maintained indefinitely, but the City Code prohibits construction of new electric fences outside of Industrial-zoned areas. In order for electric fences to be accommodated within lower-density residential areas, the Land Use Code would need to be amended. Unsheltered storage of inoperable vehicles for 30 days or more is expressly prohibited within the City. Latimer County regulations, while similar, are less frequently enforced. Some residents see this increased level of enforcement as an important loss of property rights. Animal Regulations While there is the perception that animal regulations are more restrictive in the City, there appears to be minimal conflict between present City regulations and the needs of area property owners regarding livestock and domestic animals. The Urban Estate (UE) and proposed Rural zone district regulations for horses and other farm animals virtually match that of Latimer County. Horses are permitted within these areas if a minimum of 1/2 acre of pasture is provided per horse. The City's regulations do not place a cap on the number of farm animals, but County and State health regulations still apply that may effectively limit the number of farm animals on a particular property. Staff is not aware of situations where the number of horses within the enclave exceeds the maximum number permitted, but this issue can readily be addressed. If the additional horses are legal under present County regulations, the City may add a provision in the annexation ordinance for the horses to be "grandfathered." Such language was included in the recent South Taft Hill Seventh Enclave Annexation ordinance. The only known regulatory conflict with respect to the City's animal regulations relates to wild animals housed at the Larimer County Humane Society located at 6317 Kyle Avenue. Possession and feeding of certain wild animals is expressly prohibited within the City limits. This conflicts with the growing needs of the Humane Society to care for and rehabilitate wild animals. To address this conflict, staff proposes a revision to Section 4-73 of the City Code exempting the Humane Society and similar public or quasi-public agencies from the wild or exotic animal restrictions. May 24, 2005 Page 6 Impacts to City Services City services most directly impacted by the annexation are police, streets and the electric utility. Water and sanitary sewer service is provided by the Fort Collins/Loveland Water District & South Fort Collins Sewer District and is expected to continue at the same level into the future. The recently constructed Fossil Creek Community Park and two other existing neighborhood parks will continue to provide needed active recreation opportunities to area residents. Police Services The City Council has established a target for providing Police Services at 1.5 Officers per one thousand population (1.5/1000). The Southwest Enclave will have full time resident, employment, and transient populations (delivery drivers, client/customers, etc.). Each of these subgroups comprises the Service Population of the planning area. The Service Population of the Southwest Enclave has several components. The residential part comes from the U.S. Bureau of the Census which identifies 3,127 residing in the enclave. The remaining component of Service Population is made up of traffic volume unique to the area, business employees, and customers. Based on traffic volumes on South College and the number of businesses in the area, it is estimated that there are, at least, another 2,500 new individuals that could demand Police Services throughout the day. There is also a need to estimate the non-sworn or civilian staff needed to support sworn officers. The patrol officer or detective relies on dispatchers, record clerks, and other administrative support personnel to provide service. Currently, there is approximately 0.58 FTE personnel per sworn officer. Based on the forecasted 1 st year cost, the first year FTE for the planning area would call for 12.0 FTE at an estimated cost of$1,597,232. A phase one annexation involving properties fronting College Avenue would require 5.0 FTE, which would cost an estimated $665,513. In 2003, City Patrol handled an average of 1,238 Calls for Service (CFS) per officer per year. Assuming comparable workload, it would take 5 FTE Officers to handle the calls. This number takes into account that an FTE isn't always available due to leave, training, saturation levels or other factors that affect availability. Transportation For arterial streets, costs include overlays, crackseal, surface seals, and reconstructions. Street sweeping and snow removal are estimated on a cost per mile basis. The estimated annual maintenance cost for the study area is about $101,000 per year. For collector streets the same type of costs have been estimated at about $30,900 per year. May 24, 2005 Page 7 For residential streets, the City will not do overlays, crackseal, and reconstruction until the streets are constructed to City standards. Street sweeping, snow removal and pothole maintenance would be about $4,900 per year. Total estimated costs for all three types of streets would be about $136,800 per year. In addition to these known maintenance costs, the Transportation staff identified five other potential costs: future widening of streets (street oversizing), long-term maintenance of future developments, long-term maintenance of existing developments, long-term maintenance of future road widenings, and transit service expansion into the area. The costs for these elements have not yet been completed. Library Services The Harmony Branch library is located near the north boundary of the enclave area. A review of the library patron records indicates that there are 1,137 card holders residing within the annexation area. This is a conservative estimate. Many families use one card to check out materials for their children or their spouses in addition to themselves. Also, a significant number of people use the library for phone or in person reference without getting a card. Existing Conditions and Redevelopment Onnortunity Much of the Southwest Annexation Area has already developed with single family residences. There are also commercial and a few industrial properties fronting along South College Avenue that compose a small, but very visible, part of the annexation area. One striking difference between the annexation area and most other parts of the community is the amount of open space. Approximately 1/3 of the annexation area includes land that will remain in an undeveloped condition. Most of the "open space" is due to large parcels purchased through the City's Natural Area program or are floodways with very limited development potential. Most notable is the 163 acre Hazaleus Natural Area. In addition, the City is contemplating the purchase of other parcels with sufficient natural resource value. Staff completed a study to determine the amount of vacant land available and properties likely to redevelop (a complete summary table is included in Attachment 4). As can be seen by the data, most of the residentially-zoned areas within the enclave have relatively limited development/redevelopment potential, particularly in the near term. Exceptions to this general pattern are within large vacant or sparsely populated areas zoned Urban Estate that are located north of Mountain Valley Acres subdivision and LMN-zoned parcels lying south of Trilby Road and west of College Avenue. Resubdivision potential through most of the balance of the area is limited in that most of the lots are developed, and four of the eleven largest subdivisions have recorded private covenants expressly prohibiting resubdivision of lots. Staff projects that 62 acres of commercial property is likely to redevelop on South College at some point in the future; however, the timing is somewhat difficult to predict. If the parcels were May 24, 2005 Page 8 consolidated it would equate to substantial commercial square footage, but this is tempered by the fact that the properties have the following qualities that often deter redevelopment to higher intensities: Small, narrow lots —lots within the Skyview Commercial Subdivision are typically 50 feet in width, where most of the Kelmar Strip Subdivision lots are 100 feet in width; • Multiple property owners; • Existing, viable businesses that must be relocated or purchased; and • A generally unattractive streetscape, with large signs, lack of landscaping, and poor site and architectural design. Southwest Annexation-Preliminary Revenue Projection Short-term revenues generated from the annexation area from taxes and fees are relatively minimal. There are approximately 1,324 identified parcels in the prospective annexation area. 975 are residential units, primary single family houses, and there are about 105 mobile homes. There are a few exempt properties, some personal property tax accounts, 93 commercial and some homeowner's associations. The projected property tax to the City from the entire area is minimal - about $265,000 per year. There are 108 businesses in the annexation area. Of those 108, 40 are licensed and collecting city tax on deliveries made into the city. The largest vendor is Tynan's Nissan who is licensed and collects city tax on auto sales for Fort Collins residents. Based on sales tax data from the Colorado Department of Revenue these vendors would generate an anticipated $343,225 per year, $254,453 of which could be applied to the General Fund. Long-term revenues are tied primarily to fees collected at the time of building permit issuance, i.e.- fees for Plan Review and Inspection, Street Oversizing, Capital Expansion, Storm Drainage Basin Expansion and Parkland acquisition. South College Frontage Annexation Option One alternative to annexation of the entire enclave may be to annex the area in phases. Please refer to the confidential memorandum from the City Attorney's Office regarding this option. It may be advantageous for the City to annex the commercially-zoned properties within the enclave, all of which abut South College Avenue. This area provides the greatest opportunity for both short-term and long-term revenue generation, requires the least City services, and gives the City greater control of the land use and development of this important community gateway. May 24, 2005 Page 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THE SOUTHWEST ANNEXATION Regarding the Southwest Enclave Annexation, staff makes the following recommendation: In order to comply with adopted City Plan policies and the Intergovernmental agreement between the City of Fort Collins and Larimer County, the City Council should initiate proceedings for the Southwest Enclave Annexation. Due to present budget constraints and the high cost to provide City services to the residential portions of the enclave, annexation of these residential areas should be postponed. In order to fulfill the City's obligation to Larimer County to annex properties within the Fort Collins Growth Management Area, such annexation should be completed no later than 2015. Properties fronting South College Avenue should be annexed as expeditiously as possible. These non-residential properties provide a more favorable cost-benefit ratio to the City, create an important south gateway to the community, and have the potential to generate revenues necessary to offset additional service costs to the residential areas. ATTACHMENTS 1. Map showing the Southwest Enclave Annexation area and each of the subdivisions contained within 2. Map showing a potential Annexation option limited to properties generally fronting South College Avenue 3. Matrix summarizing financial and regulatory impacts to area property owners as a result of annexation 4. Land Use Analysis-Vacant Land/Redevelopment Opportunities 5. Southwest Enclave Annexation Evaluation Costs and Revenues Matrix 6. Summary of Costs/Benefits between the entire annexation area and the South College Frontage Option 7. Projected Police Staff and Budget Impacts ATTACHMENT 4a Southwest Enclave Annexation Area • Citvof Farr Collies Ul AKFR D m < m T _ z m W T N 1?. n 11 < o O A G D mto tRD� ;1 r7. FAIRS j s SrS�GA"PE ; !;i o PPIFWH TE CT 1 ./ D C J FOSSIL a APPLEWOOD 1 CREEK j MEADOWS .......... SCENIC KNOLLS AREA" N 0 • � :.. - K DR n 1 1 i VALLEY 1 1 * CHEE ACRES YNN ACRES WILD D v � LOWE EEVES m w z � Z Ncir) ..._.._.._.._.._.._.._. _.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ 7'� TURMArDR N 10/2005 1 ATTACHMENT 2 Southwest Enclave Annexation • C.tyo«rflm College Avenue Frontage Area AkER � m 0 h L w T m _ Z m W M T <n EH�`AJJRM NY�Q OD p A �G A i 'MID D m MCG R I GO ' A j p 1 NS O L _ I WAY LN PP HFORD N •• LEWHrE�T t._.A q;ylF S ��q D HILL `O 1 ,•• O S A 4OR .p j OSSIL CIE K DR ........... _ Y CENIC DR 2� iZ.._..—.. E of • m SK —, JOHNS LN w DI —: ml 1 LA EEO) LN _� j 24U W TRILBY RD 8 TRILB D'ti • � ' `, OW A j D J D —. �4`•—...i �.._.._.._.._.._..j EEVES �_ O 1 o -+ u r 1 fr O < m R qO o o m I o .._.._.._..—..--------- ._..—.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ .. ZZ DIAM J J J P TURMA DR N 2/10/2005 Impact to SW Enclave Property Owners ATTACHMENT Service or Fee Larimer County City of Fort Collins (Prior to Annexation) (After Annexation) $60.54/mo Electric Utility bill for Poudre ($48.43 based on City electric Valley Rural Electric Authority $58.60/mo rate plus 25% service (PVREA) customers recovery fee to PVREA for 10 years. Reduced to $48.43 after 10 years). Electric Utility bill for Xcel $59.21/mo $45.41/mo customers Capital Credits potentially PVREA Capital Credits given to PVREA members p annually and on a pro-rated $0 accrued basis. $14.36/mo for typical Stormwater Utility Fee — (8,600 sq. ft.) lot d Residential $0/mo Example: Fairway Estates Subdivision estimated average = $20.61/mo City-wide average of$144/mo Stormwater Utility Fee — Examples: Kel-Mar Strip Commercial $0/mo estimated average = $134/mo Gulley Greenhouse estimated average = $944.84/mo Telephone Charge $0/mo $.70/mo Water Utility Service Provided by Fort Collins- Provided by Fort Collins- Loveland Water District Loveland Water District Wastewater (sewer) Provided by South Fort Collins Provided by South Fort Collins Utility Service Sanitation District Sanitation District • Service or Fee Larimer County City of Fort Collins (Prior to Annexation) (After Annexation) Street Maintenance Pothole repair and chip seal Pothole repair and slurry seal overlay Generally no curb, gutter or No requirement for retrofit of w sidewalk required in low curb, gutter and sidewalk for y Street Design density residential residential areas. New streets subdivisions. New streets or or reconstruction per reconstruction per LCUASS. LCUASS. At the point that local streets At the point that local streets Street Improvements fail, property owners will fail, property owners will financially participate in a financially participate in a Special Improvement District. Special Improvement District. 3.8% (0.8% County + 3% Sales Tax City sales tax) (applicable to residents) 0.8% County sales tax Example: additional $600 City sales tax on purchase of $20,000 vehicle Sales Tax County Sales Tax License/ City Sales Tax License/ (applicable to commercial Collect and Remit County Collect and Remit City sales u) property owners) sales tax tax K co H 3.7% Use Tax on motor 6.0% Use Tax on motor Use Tax (commercial) vehicles vehicles, building materials, and building materials and other tangible goods County tax rate including Estimated additional $11.84 Property Tax Poudre Valley Fire District property tax per year on a levy of 9.301 mills house valued at $300,000 • Service or Fee Larimer County City of Fort Collins (Prior to Annexation) (After Annexation) Permitted on firearm owners' Discharging of Firearms property or with property Prohibited owner's permission Horse Ownership One horse per ''/: acre of lot No change area w Farm Animal Ownership Permitted Permitted within Urban Estate = Zone District 0 a, Electric Fences Permitted Prohibited except in the m Industrial Zone District Per City Sign Code Permanent non-conforming Sign Regulations Per County Sign Code signs removed within 5 years and prohibited signs within 60 days Private Covenants Subject to private standards No change as recorded • ATTACHMENT • (n O O O O O o ITO -It v M O v IT -It CD LO O M M co (O (O N O O O O O O m N y� (n U� Vl O O O M (D N N N 0) N E (O (O co (U cv E 0 U (O I� m O V V IT M t0 N O M co co N V co (O a) (O M N CL 0 a IT yy N N N (O (O +3 .0 1� ONO m (O N (O 1- V' (O N (O (O (O (n H N 7 N i C Q d H D c u C > R rn J c r c y = c E > E CL E cC Ea c .. v m d m a> > > E j o c a � a ,►,' m 0 c C d O N U_ E T >y 3 C CL C G • = J C O O m cc N C Z W C >N Z +0 1 F C O U J W p W13 t � $ 2 20 CD \ � - Ca 0 � U) ] § okk \ ) - � � E ] \ \� ) ) /® � % j \§ ] \ j ] a) cc m 7� > a) ) A2 ] » zEt § � ngiLo J 0 ' � _ _0l m / -0 m x § } k2 « ) ` \ \� k0L6 \ 0 to., a / s � \ LO 2J CD ; 2 . = k f $ e co § LO \ U J / wf ° §_ m » C ( ) rC_D2 k rM m L2 \ SJ z 2 x = 0 2 0 0 = » c — § E R $ 2 , « � cu m 0 0 7 2 « a W / Ch 0 \ CD » k . _ �$ 5 u0 \ o m _ ) \ c { o \ m \ \ ( \ \ / { ( /\ \ : 0 ] _ / @IEq » 2 \= " 0 000 \} \ � �k > /� , 002EE o a) , J c £ ® EE & 1 ƒ» f E § } : - � � � - � � k � k\ > /« i ) � - 2 ] mm < Lt— f22Q $ i87./ t 2 A \f E ) J o2 \ S . . 2 ] a - Fm N 0 O E 0a7 a7 a) 0 Co -� M wow a C � o 0 0 C C .O m ° C � h -O N, > v a)N � `6 X rn � Q ° E a a'� N y ° `o > ` m 0) C L 0) � m v ` c m 0w tl n � mv — °' a� n ' N o E o CU OLoo ` >,K. 0 oo 0 o 0 6 a fA >. id ID I C d O Lo ��' > Cl) e- d W E9 a) c > c o > o cn al =_ N w y O O Q• N Lo M U f° O U U .� L2cm T0Oo 0O o M>N O XN )CU carc.2 ¢ w `o — m E 0 0 aN as o UU fl N y d C E O a=+ >.�.• C y cn n. ° > ° `" >,'60 > � 3 n. U d '_� N N 'No E t o N m O H cc 0r v �> o (0Z • a) ` � ° p UM b0 � o mvai0 a V mn N .0 -0.ayd 0 N E y c .0 n ° Um a)c ' a0 omo (i 3 � ,�, v a c , o � � m aai C U g tea (D n� 2 Eoon °�' _� c �> ma>i � Eon °'—>° ° omm � maia> ° o a � o v U U o a> 'r- c o > rn � u ) U d ' Q " E a) ct, `oaci . n d u L N ° N Q C O C+ Q � d O U G N d C N � H — N _ � k@ { \ ) ) § � �$ E § , k72 /2 * E \ § / t § £ ® . ] 2 k\ E0 . c(D 0 E ) o / @oq ¥ a7 : 0 .00 ! lSfo@ - c � } 2f7 « ±± f < o ) § \ \ \ / % Ua \ E] ] 7 & occ20 \ > ] ( o » n � ) \ /)o . § CD 0 % ) CD 0 i= 30 \ co ; £ o 00s0 ° § $ & a. ix E e 7 a o /) & \ \ o \_ 2 /) / ( 7 ) p # _ 2 2 £ � « ° w32cm ® � o � ; mE _ / m ) = 0 0m0 ` \ G k � w - o ` cc � { § $ a ] \ \ / $ t £ § / « ) ) Q ® ' < ` ; ® | Q \Q ] § � - , mlm2 $ �= =- m § 000 __ - ; im o . . � , ± 72a , mCL /j { ) ) \ � ° ° (D 0 77f2 ) 7 [#) e . , g E � \ mCL0 022 � � ° * & e2E ±< £ @Ca) \ ° _ ° 2 � \ ) � � ) ) k ; t ) ] �\ (k ) � . m a) f ; 22222@ _ } E7E2a0# r) CL0 Ms- a) ) kkf2 / k) c/) e = 322aEQ \ E_ T) mE 3 : % #« @ ] 2Emc0m0 § G f\ , \ . 0 k^ } 3 ] $ 2 < S ± $ N _ O N 7 n C N N �' L lI Y 0 0 = c0 CD O a) U O w f0 U uN U •N O c c 0 m N C c o U£ aC) vN o o > c Q N _ Cm a) om fa60 0)m OO N d _U0) N N C 7 N`m tm 'O> 0 - c y 0 - rO C0 cN. xa) 0 - x -0 O 7 6 U ZN N U) U ip W m co i UU >eo m e C N o �+ V > C O d w C m O O O C L G N Q a 10 '� N N L O m2U Q O T d O N a1 C m O O O a1 O O O w aY0 Q co > o o 0 0 N m O n O U UU m U N C w m O O w c a) O O O O C L Y a) m CL = m O U) c O U > C = a a) 0 cc o 0) C O m O O O a) :: a a° m Cl) =o E o E m o O o UU y�an w m U m cu -mN a cN L0 0 ) N cU Q) 0 -j U N C O w N N 0 0 � c m IL �am -0 L )1 " Ov WWC > ,C0a O t° a> non L6o m oCDu Uc EEN .c m -0 >1 Cc o 'o C L c Uoa)w a) m E m UV a) ° L ° � >` N 'moo >, cE >` aoiEm ate ° oo �. N NU c � xm0) 0 amiE3 Iowa uaQ (a cam ° cN � c � )p `° N .L... C N 2 U 'o U >, co y m U w m C � U Q L 3 E cw2'aoN � amma) -oo NO > 1bo a�iOo > = O U Ca N •C O N U = c 0) c CL 0 O- f6 N "O U N L (p a'C o �C Q ) ° w n E 3 m o 5 aca ° o > m c c a a > ° o ac L J .O q) 7 N o. 3 L Ltl c m a) to o .5 w aN o2 d C -o 0O c v mU 0) •j U) L (D Z N >1 c 0) (n (A � FU 20) mN Y L A C C Q a+ m ar U C C 0 E E O U N E c > m Ua. wui v $ & !E = ) E co % co % k ) 2 ] E kk a J - - - � � o j \ § / \ \ j / Wcc \ 0 § % ) ) ) \ 0-0 0 o 2 � � ) � Q C L k a) k k 0 Go § c > a ) CD o 0 � � 32 g CLr , o § 0 m u ) ka , \ ■ « @ 00o0) ° ` « (D ] k (LIX --- E E _ = o /) $ ] § jE § k oE E \ — 2/ B $ — — $ a® , — z _§ - ::_ 3\ \ \} \ j {}/ j k \\\ \�� 2 \ kkk ; fZ § « 2 \ \ o 7� f / 0 �- ]o0 ) , }- \ a) a) 7E 3 [ > c@ ! \ s « \ / ) / §$ a ) 32E ] 2 2) 8 / k / \ / £ p § }S \ k - - 0 m \ k } § § \ $ > $ I / ) ƒ pE 3 ) / \ . / � k � = e $ / } { p ) } § j \ kk ) \ k & ° » ca B ( CL ( / ( f $ A $ Z2 } § ° / 0 ` ) \2 \ ) f 0 m « 2 ] g A f \ \ 2J 3 ) _ § ) « 3 /j » \ \ $ o § ova . : o . c o � ■ o � 77 ƒ j [ $ 2 f < at § E /U } ) ( ` � � m ® - kjk / \ ! Q) (n t a cn � m - ; tlr » k (° ± § - f = 0 37 = cfe « [a � CL ) \k © /® � � « 2 EVE / \ f = / = aim - n ® - a _ _ \ ® m _ - mfo � 5 ; - & { # 2 ) � 25 � ± & 8 � ] = - § 2500 = � » 0 2w � § � = >, m � I = - , m /2a +/ 00 0 :3C \) � ° kk7 (D 'n0a222 # \ ° U) o o } &« E0 � eeeeeol � - # [ m £ k § 7 � ƒ £ § ) t ) # - = 2o ) § f f237 ) oja2 ) § » E >fk § 7 { £ F § + 2 [ E \ fe / § J \ ) ® o f n ) / = o / 6 / 1 \ . S 7 / D N w 0 U m m 0 yo `mu > ca vC m .>_ C 9 Cl) O w m w 0 > 0 0 a) 0 E O a) 0 0 C 0 U E O -rO. Ea o mEa) E mE •Z 0 U ` 0) 7 `- w w 0) a) U a) 0) .0 D1 f9 C w w w m > = > C O w i+ Q C x > .0 O N O n 0 Q o x x U m a O > C m 7 m O X a) LL m W 0 0.a t : : .cv � . LUvd e v U 0 CD V N a U p W X O cca) a) w p w Q 0 CD a 0 0 ` o d O AEU w Q co ` Lo 16 7 N x M 0 C C V + M O d d O x M 0 C. W to 7 C 0 w 0 w O C C) Z W m $ o3g 04 UU 0 0 maW m aa) m C C N a) w O •++ C U 0 m U C) to ac o p (D n C O AEU m m a) > c 0 O cc jd 0 LO N .f0 c >L> w CN 7 U E T O > C M w X C C m a a) O >Lo N Y N O O C w > O Z, y O.l w O O wQ COS coQ m coi � n � o. CN m Cl) co 0 c E M ,O M m 0 U) /1 t0 M m 0 Q U ` C N O 16 O U a > c 69 C) L) o w 0 0svm0N m 0 � mm Ww t= 0 U = E w U w 0 t .N 0 O a w N C N O = _ °) O � mwr m •o � � m ° >' 03mm ° v c� 3 � a NEm (D ZaZi aa'im ? � m c € �' aEim � m 0 w ° �; a) (D In a�`� Nm wnmmy ° '3 = - Omwm0 -0 a u m =; co v ' EEwTT� oYEo � yooa) � wYW � 'o cm) ` 0 m U .,0., 0 m O) m 0 N m 0 > 0 w a) O CU O.'CwawwU O.> C " Cy C CO y Ow ONU 'O0 cn E m 00 j 0) C > 7 0 = 0 0 7 m 3 L 0 0 m N N C N 0 0 C 0 U O C 7 O U 4a 0 +� C "0 w o- U oa) . o -03 . � o00co > ac m00cc E0 w u m Z 0W 0 0 0 3 w 0) m , ov o dam m o c m ao m c m w t m a) mcw LP cam = co p w >,° r > y. o w a) aEi o m c U .� o 0 aw? c"= � '3v ° > > y S o 'x = o z a m � rn � >. ro ->a m e 'x .0 0—0 -c° 5` cq pc v a v 0 V 0 7 U 0_ O .�., U 'C D w a m E F- 0 m w L) m n w m U Q :L- w 0 c u a)v m O C N m m ` 3 7)C m w IL cn U w LL m Q m U LL (L C k y O E ` •' g c a1 c09 E o a E rn > > O m 121 a c w U E o m m o z rn 0) in cn c a) o r V m C C X O m ar w m o o 0 0 0 0 N w N Q CL C m O 60 O m2U Q O) N C N O } r CD w' O CD N 0) > a1 N e- O O U) CL a 2 p a � = N > 0 > O C a y i3 LO > 0 O O CD o O 0 O N m m r• e m O .- U U U 69. d V M co C N co O o ++ d o CD 0 0 0 0 0 w :° c Y3 co CL ° 'm o v+ a O R � U d > c m Z, R m o m r 0 o d c y o 0 0 0 0 o n }; Q ° x CL uJ, m L N Cl) O 7 O C O > O O O O CD a W c m O S U U 'fl (D a) E E 'O p 0'"O ) C c U yc u o y m c y v a 3 c� 3 O N v) �.. ago cac m0•> � � o a>i � L E '� E c o .2u) a� 2 a� w j m ++ XO C 7 TO a) .O a) N c U c U — ` V u u r Q O c a ai LL U l9 N y .. m O m O m �0 �0 O X m j N LL "O a) O a1 - y . O O w- N p O x CL U m a N N O „ a, a E O ,E 7 p C C a C C N C N C Ecf9j QO cQ ° � �' � :) :33 m �' E E ai °� � E � 0) � m w o y m 'w .� o o c o - ao @ o- am o aci N 3 aim Q Ec ° mom' a� coo coo r- (D > m O a) 'Om 7 " � m0 '0 � U7 'O O > > � ° > > � UN •c 2N � . a = 0 0 > > w c ° m V m O o N U '� U N c -Op '00 y °- . 'a aa)i O N 3 � W o m � b .S U = as Q w 2 w Q 2Ec < m Z o. m C d � g c >> o >, a o y � Qa n U a2 ci N> m c :a) o c o o J in y >N E Ui ai UW a Ii oi ¢ i Qc m d am+ X Q d F� Ey m C d t) d a) V G! N _ C Z a> O N 0 U' 0 U) d co / C \ \ / \ E ) « , ! ! ° � 0c \ / ) % & ) § S \ ) | } Cl) c o � ° (D . � 2U) CNI 0) o & a OD Lf) § 3 ! - 7 ¥ { \ i \ 22 1-7 Q k JJ j ƒ/ { c 00 % § 'aCD u00 ) 0 & £ 3 - ) ) -F � to 0X ; co a) / k ( 3 « w 7 ] ) E E ) . \ 0 . /\ \ 7 § \\ \ e (DM m $ wr 0 ) U � ` um \ § 2 - E � � � � � /) > ne ) ( f] % ap � c ; 7 ) 2 / § _ ! \) > E # ) § zE « 5 GB5 = & R \ / ® e \ § } _ 0 m / \ § k # D \ ƒ k k �} / \ m o , _ « < : = 2t E 2 % t ) ) 77r ! ) E / C f # ( a � ) \ ) ) ) } k } ) .e ® � • c § ° © § 7 / 2 ) > § m - � / . , . . . . . . . $ J (� ° 2 0 a O�- o � � = � +, m I Q) _ .20 Ecan) m W\ L N � coEvico W • 0 I I Q C O) LCo it (0 C •� •N U) co is > a-4-0 a) ON a) x > X cn � � a) ocu 0 E > U � cu C > — Irm +' o CCS o ca _ = a E a� E ti J ° co LJ s 69. X EO cn •— II v , Er o � E >� Q U � • LO >, `+- O O C O CD CO 6 > O }I r' (D X Y A > COC � ca O a� L m E E w U a) w V 4- W O 61% N cn L N 0 +�+ 70 O :3 .�.�� c Q C ° W O E a) U Cl) m > OO • ° d d c � c U ca a) c c -0 VJ o > U E o Q W —a�i c U. ° o a>i ' O �, o L N ° G) o ° o N Q Eo cn = Otf � f6 N m O aD GM) Q M c E rn co a� O � coi cn cn o a) a) M d = � __ � � O Fa) • Attachment 7 Projected Police Staff and Budget Impacts The following staff and budget estimates are based on the estimated Service Population of 5004. The first year cost is based on the 2003 City Budget for various position classes within FCPS. Sworn is a combination of Patrol Officers ($134,258) and Detectives ($166,436) assuming a 3:1 ratio. The Non-Sworn first year is an average of Information Services ($106,607) and Dispatch ($122,802). South College Annexation: Projected Staff and Budget Impacts FTE 1st Year Cost/FTE Total Cost Sworn 8.5 $ 142,302 $1,209,567 Non-Sworn 4.0 114,704 458,816 Total 12.0 N/A $1,668,383 POSITION: Police Officer Salary/Benefits: $76,143 • 2003 ASSOCIATED COSTS: Ongoing One time Lease costs Space allocation 25% Lease(Police Officer) 1,889 25% Space allocation (Police Officer) 5,883 Desk Chair File Cabinet Otherfurniture: Bookcase Work table Computer equipment Office supplies (ave) 155 140 Groupwise 104 Telephone Clothing Dry Cleaning 335 Lab Supplies 103 206 Film & Photo Processing 87 Uniforms/Equipment 1,802 Uniforms/Equipment(Including MFF & Shotgun) 7,875 • Vehicle UP 8,755 Equipment Fund Rents/Outside Vehicle Repair 3,127 Motor Fuel & Oil 1,527 • Training (sworn) 1,000 Training (non) Tuition Reimbursement 1,000 Academy 5,000 FTO Program O/T 8,045 Officer Overtime 5,363 Pager 148 Summons/Form Expenses 250 Hiring Costs 5060 Cell phone Reimbursement 180 2003 A: Ongoing: Sal/Benes 76,224 B: Ongoing: Operating 25,721 C: One time:Operating 32,313 First Year Costs 134,258 Ongoing Costs 101,945 POSITION: Average DB Position Salary/Benefits: $79,105 2003 ASSOCIATED COSTS: Ongoing One time • Lease costs 7,555 Space allocation 23,530 25% Lease (Police Officer) 25% Space allocation (Police Officer) Desk 830 Chair 526 File Cabinet 207 Other furniture: Bookcase Work table 266 Computer equipment 2,575 Office supplies(ave) 360 250 Groupwise 104 Telephone 420 470 Clothing 375 Dry Cleaning 335 Lab Supplies 103 206 Film & Photo Processing 87 Uniforms/Equipment 1,802 Uniforms/Equipment(Including MFF & Shotgun) 7,875 Vehicle UP 8,755 Equipment Fund Rents/Outside Vehicle Repair 3,127 Motor Fuel &Oil 1,527 • Training (sworn) 1,000 Training (non) • Tuition Reimbursement 1,000 Academy 5,000 FTO Program Orr 8,045 Officer Overtime 5,363 Pager 148 Summons/Form Expenses 250 Hiring Costs 5060 Cell phone Reimbursement 180 2003 A: Ongoing: Sal/Benes 79,105 B: Ongoing: Operating 32,387 C: One time:Operating 54,944 First Year Costs 166,436 Ongoing Costs 111,492 POSITION: Average Info. Services Position (including Lab) Salary/Benefits: $66,562 2003 ASSOCIATED COSTS: Ongoing One time Lease costs 7,555 • Space allocation 23,530 25% Lease(Police Officer) 25% Space allocation (Police Officer) Desk 842 Chair 280 File Cabinet 329 Other furniture: Bookcase Work table 258 Computer equipment 2,450 Office supplies(ave) 150 250 Voicemail 31 Voicemail 96 Groupwise 104 Telephone 504 690 Telephone Clothing Dry Cleaning Uniforms/Equipment Uniforms/Equipment (Including MFF) Traffic Radar Equipment Vehicle UP Equipment Fund Rents Motor Fuel& Oil • Training (sworn) Training (non) 1000 • Academy FTO Program OR Officer Overtime Pager 148 Hiring Process 1648 Cell phone 180 2003 A: Ongoing: Sal/Benes 66,562 B: Ongoing: Operating 9,633 C: One time:Operating 30,412 First Year Costs 106,607 Ongoing Costs 76,195 POSITION: Average Comm Center Position Salary/Benefits: $73,534 2003 ASSOCIATED COSTS: Ongoing One time Lease costs 7,555 Space allocation 23,530 25% Lease (Police Officer) • 25% Space allocation (Police Officer) Desk Chair File Cabinet Other furniture: Bookcase Work table Computer equipment Office supplies(ave) 360 Voicemail Voicemail Groupwise 104 Telephone Telephone Clothing Dry Cleaning Uniforms/Equipment Uniforms/Equipment(Including MFF) Traffic Radar Equipment Vehicle UP Equipment Fund Rents Motor Fuel & Oil Training (sworn) Training (non) 1500 • Academy FTO Program O/T 7,928 • Officer Overtime 5,285 Pager 148 Hiring Process 2,678 Cell phone 180 2003 A: Ongoing: Sal/Benes 73,534 B: Ongoing: Operating 15,028 C: One time:Operating 34,240 First Year Costs 122,802 Ongoing Costs 88,662 • •