Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 04/18/2000 - SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 33, 2000 , AMENDIN AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM NUMBER: to DATE: April 18, 2000 FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL STAFF: Ronald G. Fuchs SUBJECT: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 33,2000, Amending the Zoning Map of the City of Fort Collins by Changing the Zoning Classification for That Certain Property Known as the Interstate Lands Rezoning. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On April 4, 2000, Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2000-52 Amending the City Structure Plan Map. The parcels affecting the Structure Plan Amendments and Rezone request are known as the Interstate Lands project. On April 4, 2000, Council also unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 33, 2000, changing the zoning classification for the property known as Interstate Lands Rezoning. AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM NUMBER: 12 A-B DATE: April 4, 2000 FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL STAFF: Ronald G. Fuchs SUBJECT: Items Relating to Interstate Lands Rezoning. RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning and Zoning Board recom ena adoption t'f the Resolution and the Ordinance on First Reading. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A. Resolution 2000-52 Amending the City Structure Plan Map. B. First Reading of Ordin a 0, a i the oning Map of the City of Fort Collins by Changing e Zom Class c o .!'or , Certain Property Known as the ` Interstate Lands Rezo I g 9 61 The parcels affecting the Structure Plan Amendments and Rezone request are known as the Interstate Lands project. This item has three parts: 1. Request to amend the City Structure Plan as follows: (a) Expand the Low-Density Mixed-Use Residential designation into the current Employment designation. (b) Expand the Urb s to na ' int e c ent Low-Density Mixed-Use Residential des atio i (c) Designate as '" ion of :_ospec ' om existing corridor further west to County Road en to a ighway 1 (Mulberry Street) to the Interstate 25 (I-25) interchange into a sit corridor. 2. Request to rezone five(5)parcels totaling 65.322 acres within an approximate 155.57 acre site as follows: p (a) Rezone property from Employment District (E) to Low Density Mixed-Use ! Neighborhood District(LMN)consistent with 1 (a)above. (b) Rezone property from Commercial District(C)to Employment District(E). 3. Make technical corrections to update the legal descriptions of zoning districts to ensure the descriptions match the districts as shown on the zoning map. DATE: April 4, 2000 2 ITEM NUMBER: 12 A-B BACKGROUND: The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: I, Industrial (County) - mix of commercial and industrial uses (Crossroads East Business Center), RI, Residential (County) (Sunrise Acres) S: C, Commercial; E,Employment; and, RC, River Conservation- undeveloped E: C, Commercial - adjacent to 1-25 interchange (Johns Harley-Davidson); and I, Industrial - east of I-25 W: UE, Urban Estate, undeveloped; FA-1, Farming (County) - large lot residential; and, R, Residential (County) - small lot residential 0*61d05 FU_§t) The property was annexed to the city as ning of the terstate Lends First and Second Annexations in 1989,and was placed into two`(2)zo districts to H-B,Highway Business Zone(151.6 acres) and the R-P, Planned Residential Zone (40 acres). In March 1997 the City adopted City Plan including the City Structure Plan,the Land Use Code and the Zoning Map. As one of several"hot spot" properties where the appropriate zoning was contested, this property was placed in the T- Transition zone district. Issues were resolved and the current zoning of Commercial District (C), Employment District(E),Urban Estate District(UE), and Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood District (LMN) occurred in November 1997. The applicant is now requesting additional changes to the zoning. A. Structure Plan Amendment 1 ~4i This Structure Plan amendme , 1' a'' b decided ed on the duly adopted goals and policies set forth in the City's City an.The applicant s provi ed a Burden of Proof narrative(see Attachment C) citing policies of justification from City Plan. The Planning and Zoning Board and staff concur with the applicant's cited policies and agree with the structure plan re-designations, supporting the applicant's amendments to the Structure Plan with the exception of the transit corridor designation. It was Planning and Zoning Board's contention that the re-designation of the transit corridor should wait until the Transfort Strategic Plan is completed. B. Rezone Request Section 2.8.4[H][2] of the L ' d UsOdf, o Nil andato requirements for any amendment to the Zoning Ma ` involvir rezom of lands within the City in order to be approved by the City " i Sec ' 2.8.4[H][3] outlines additional considerations that may be considered by the City Council. Provided the City Council finds that the Structure Plan Amendments are appropriate,the rezone requests can be found to be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has submitted a Burden of Proof narrative justifying the requested rezones (see attachment D). The Planning and Zoning Board and staff concur with the applicant's analysis for requested rezones. The proposed rezones from Commercial District(C)to Employment District(E) and from Employment District(E)to Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood District(LMN) are appropriate for this property;are compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land;will not result in significantly adverse impacts on the natural environment; and, will result in a logical and orderly development pattern. The property is currently not in the residential sign district. DATE: April 4, 2000 3 ITEM NUMBER: 12 A-B PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION: On March 16, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Board, made the following recommendations: 1. The Planning and Zoning Board by a vote of 5-0, recommends that the City Council approve the applicant's request to amend the Structure Plan from Employment District to Low-Density Mixed-Use Residential and Low-Density Mixed-Use Residential to Urban Estate with the following condition: The irregular zoning district boundaries shall not be used as justification for any future development proposal. 2. The Planning and Zoning Board by a vote of 5-0, recommends that the City Council deny the applicant's request for reclassification and extension of a major transit corridor for East Prospect Road. 3. The Planning and Zoning Board by a vote of 5-0,recommends that the that the City Council approve the applicant's Rezone Petition request to rezone the subject area from Commercial District zoning to Employment District zoning. 4. The Planning and Zoning Board by a vote of 5-0, recommends that the City Council approve the applicant's Rezone Petition request to rezone the subject area from Employment District z ng si% a se esidential zoning. ATTACHMENTS: A. Vicinity Map B. Staff Recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board C. Request for Amendments to Structure Plan D. Interstate Land Rezoning Petition -Justification for Rezoning Petition E. Existing Structure Plan F. Proposed Structure Plan G. Existing and Proposed Zoning Boundaries H. Zoning Map Plat 1. Excerpt from March 16 PI ���///mg oni' B d i� s EXHIBITS: . = Lp� L...,,.v el� �F A. City of Fort Collins—Proposed Structure Plan