HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES-04/29/2013-AdjournedApril 29, 2013
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
Council -Manager Form of Government
Adjourned Meeting - 6:00 p.m.
An adjourned meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins was held on Monday, April 29,
2013, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City of Fort Collins City Hall. Roll call was
answered by the following Councilmembers: Campana, Cunniff, Horak, Overbeck, Poppaw, Troxell,
and Weitkunat.
Staff Members Present: Atteberry, Nelson, Roy.
Continuance of Items Relating to the Foothills Mall to May 7.2013.
The following is the staff memorandum for these items.
"EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff has proposed that the Midtown Urban Renewal Plan be amended to authorize the use of tax
increment financing in the Foothills Mall area of the Plan, in connection with the furtherance of a
proposed redevelopment of the Foothills Mall for the. eradication of blight under the Plan. As
required in connection with such an amendment, notice ofa public hearing on the Plan amendment
forApri129, 2013 was provided to all property owners, residents, and owners of business concerns
in the Urban Renewal Area, and to Lorimer County, and was published in the Fort Collins
Coloradoan.
In addition, amendments to the Service Plan of the Foothills Metropolitan District related to the
redevelopment of Foothills Mall have also been proposed. Notice ofa public hearingfor April 29,
2013 on the proposed amendments was published and mailed, as required by, City policy.
Staff is requesting that each of the two public hearings described in the notices and consideration
of the related items be continued to May 7, 2013, to allowfurther time for development of the details
of a related redevelopment and reimbursement agreement, as well as a related preliminary
agreement with Larimer County.
BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION
Urban Renewal Plan Amendment
The Midtown Urban Renewal Plan (Plan) was adopted by the Urban Renewal Authority (URA)
Board in September 2011, and ratified and reaffirmed February 2013, The purpose of the Plan is
to provide the URA the opportunity to use tax increment financing (TIF) to remediate blighted
33
April 29, 2013
conditions through development and redevelopment. In July 2012, Walton Foothills Holdings IV,
LLC (Owner), purchased Foothills Mall and adjacent property with the intent to complete a
significant redevelopment.
An Agreement to Negotiate was executed between the Owner and the URA in November 2012, and
discussions with regard to the publicfinancingpackage have been occurring since; one component
of the package being TIF via the URA. In order to utilize TIF, City Council must first amend the
existing Plan and create a TIF District. Once a TIF District is created, the URA is permitted to
collect incremental tax revenue,for a period of up to 25 years.
Notice was mailed to all property owners, residents, and owners of business concerns in the Urban
Renewal Area on March 29, 2013, and published in the Fort Collins Coloradoan on March 29,
2013, that a public hearing would be held by the City Council on April 29, 2013, for the purpose of
amending the Plan to authorize the use of tax increment financing in the Foothills Mall area of the
Plan, as well as other undertakings and activities in accordance with the Colorado Urban Renewal
Law, Sections 31-25-101, et seq., C.R.S. In addition, required notice and an estimation of fiscal
impacts was provided to Lorimer County on January 25, 2013.
Foothills Metropolitan District Service Plan Amendment
In addition, to allow the use of the Foothills Metropolitan District (District) to raise revenues and
incur debt in connection with the Redevelopment and Reimbursement Agreement currently being
prepared for City Council consideration on May 7, 2013, amendments to the Service Plan for the
District are required. An initial Service Plan for the District was approved by the Ciry Council on
September 4, 2012, and the District was subsequently formed after approval by the voters in the
District area. The initial Service Plan did not authorize the District to move forward to,fund, build
orfinance improvements, with the expectation that approval ofamendments'would be proposedfor
Council consideration to the extent required to carry out the purposes ofthe District, in light of the
specific redevelopment project plans and the related financing terms.
Procedures.for approval and amendment of metropolitan district service plans are set out in the
City's metropohitan district policy (adopted by the Council on July 15, 2008). In addition to
published notice ofa required public hearing, the City's policy also requires that notice be mailed
to all owners of property within the District service area. Notice ofa public hearing on a proposed
amendment to the District Service Plan scheduled for April 29, 2013, was published, and notices
have been mailed to all owners ofproperty within the District area as required in the City policy.
Staff is requesting that each of the two public hearings described in the notices, and consideration
of the related items, be continued to May 7, 2013, in order to allow further time for development of
the details of a related redevelopment and reimbursement agreement, as well as a related
preliminary agreement with Lorimer County.
FINANCIAL I ECONOMIC IMPACTS
Continuation of the Public Hearings has no direct financial/economic.
34
April29, 2013
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Continuation of the Public Hearings has no direct environmental impacts.
Mayor Weitkunat withdrew from the discussion of this item due to a conflict of interest.
Mayor Pro Tern Horak stated this continuance will provide additional time for community input and
allow staff to develop a complete package of responses to questions.
Eric Sutherland, 3520 Golden Currant, suggested the continuance to May 7 does not allow enough
time for community input. He opposed the business assistance package for the mall as a poor
economic choice.
Thomas Edwards, Fort Collins Bicycle Coalition, suggested having a bicycle valet in the Midtown
area.
Councilmember Poppaw made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Campana, to continue the
Public Hearing and Consideration ofAmendments to the Midtown Urban Renewal Plan to Authorize
the Use of Tax Increment Financing in the Foothills Mall Area of the Plan to May 7, 2013.
Councilmember Cunniff stated this is the minimum amount of delay needed.
Councilmember Poppaw encouraged staff to explore a date even further out. City Manager
Atteberry replied staff has worked with the applicant who has indicated any date later than May 7
is problematic in terms of meeting commitments.Per feedback from Council, a great deal of
information has been placed on the City's web page and public outreach has begun in force.
Councilmember Poppaw stated she has received comments from constituents indicating confusion
with some of the language falsely suggesting District 2 is going to be taxed. She noted the issue is
complicated and that this type of extreme misunderstanding is occurring with residents. She
expressed concern regarding the fact that Council should be aiding citizens rather than meeting a
timeline of a developer.
City Manager Atteberry stated the replay of the Foothills Mall Work Session has run on Channel
14 more often than usual and reiterated that May 7 is as long as this item can be postponed.
Mayor Pro Tern Horak suggested citizen misconceptions be directly addressed by staff at the May
7 hearing.
Councilmember Cunniff expressed concern that not all of the citizen concerns can be resolved by
May 7 and stated he would have difficulty supporting the project should that be the case.
The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: Poppaw, Horak, Overbeck, Troxell, Cunniff and
Campana. Nays: none.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
35
April29, 2013
Councilmember Poppaw made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Troxell, to continue the
Public Hearing and Consideration of Amendments to the Foothills Metropolitan District Service
Plan Relating to the Foothills Mall to May 7, 2013.
Mayor Pro Tem Horak stated the City would like to engage the County in discussions regarding
working together on this Urban Renewal Authority project.
The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: Horak, Overbeck, Troxell, Cunniff. Campana and
Poppaw. Nays: none.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance No.068, 2013, Authorizing the
Conveyance of a Non -Exclusive Utility Easement to
Public Service Company of Colorado, Adopted on First Reading
The following is the staff memorandum for these items.
"EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Ordinance conveys a Non -Exclusive Utility Easement to Public Service Company of Colorado
(" PSCo ).
The City ofFort Collins staff worked with PSCo over the past several months to determine the
alignment ofand mitigate the impacts for a new 16-inch high pressure gas transmission line within
city limits. The project is designed and construction is expected to start in May 2013. Most of the
City issues were addressed, and City Council approved easements in Natural Areas and adopted
Resolution 2013-022 on March 19, 2013, directing the use of the payments from PSCo be used for
natural areas and trails.
There was continuing concern, however, about the proposed location of the pipeline in private
property at the northwest corner of Harmony Road and Shields Street. Although this was primarily
an issue of concern between the property owner and PSCo, the City expressed concern over the
impacts on future commercial development at the site. At its March 19 meeting, City Council
directed the City Manager to follow up with PSCo on this issue. Following several conversations
with senior PSCo executives and project staff, they agreed in principle to relocate the pipeline
within the Shields Street right-of-way if the City, agreed to pay for any relocation of the
approximately 2, 000 feet of line adjacent to the property that may be necessary in the next fifteen
years.
This is a low -risk option, given the location of the pipeline in the Shields Street right of way. PSCo
is redesigning the pipeline within the Shields Street right -of way. In order to document this
agreement between the City and PSCo, staffrecommends a Non -Exclusive Pipeline Easement within
the Shields Street right-of-way.
BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION
Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo), an Xcel Energy company, is requesting easements
within the Shields Street right-of-way to construct, operate, and maintain a high pressure gas
36
April29, 2013
pipeline. The proposed project is part of the larger West Main Natural Gas Pipeline Replacement
Project (West Main Project) that encompasses Larimer, Weld, and Boulder Counties. The project
will replace an existing eight -inch gas pipeline that is 83 years old and at the end of service life,
with a 16-inch high pressure gas pipeline. The proposed project will traverse the city north to south
and will impact the road surface and traffic along Shields Street, Horsetooth Road, McClelland
Drive, Drake Road, and Timberline Road.
PSCo is authorized in Section 6 of the City Code to construct, operate and maintain gas facilities
within the public right-of-way. Much of this project's pipeline will be located in the right-of-way.
PSCo company policy, encourages the use ofundeveloped property ifit is available, so they designed
the line to veer west across Shields and into private property at the northwest corner of Harmony
and Shields. The owners of that property strongly objected and PSCo initiated eminent domain:
action to acquire an easement on the property. This action is primarily between PSCo and the
property owners, but the City has an interest in the implementation of its Structure Plan, and the
expected commercial development of the property.
At the City's request, PSCo agreed to amend the design to move the line away from the private
property and into the right-of-way in this 2, 000foot stretch. However, PSCo asked that the City
guarantee they will not have to relocate the line for fifteen years, with an extension offive years if
the private property is not yet developed. This is an extremely low -risk possibility because of the
location and depth of the line. That is the intent of this easement.
FINANCIAL /ECONOMIC IMPACTS
The approval of the easement will eliminate the impacts of the gas transmission line on future
commercial development at the site on the northwest corner of Harmony Road and Shields Street
(designated as a neighborhood shopping center). If the City requires the pipeline within the
easement to be relocated within 15 years of installation, the relocation would be at the City's
expense.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The proposed re -alignment for the project will avoid impacts to the private property and place the
pipeline in the public right-of-way.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Three open houses were held in Larimer County to share the overall plan with the public. A total
of 3,409 property owners within 750 feet of the preferred and alternate pipeline routes within Fort
Collins were notified of the meetings.
Open houses were held as follows:
February 29, 2012 at the Walt Clark Middle School in Loveland from 4 to 7pm.
March 8, 2012 at the Fort Collins Marriott in Fort Collins from 4 to 7pm.
October 25, 2012 at the Lincoln Center in Fort Collins from 4 to 7pm.
37
April29, 2013
In addition, a West Main project website(www.xcelenergywesimainpipeline.com) was created to
provide updated information on the project and related open houses. "
Rick Richter, City Engineer, stated this item relates to a utility easement for Public Service
Company within the Shields Street right-of-way. This easement will allow staff to resolve a
question about the location of a new transmission line needed to replace an aging pipeline. Richter
detailed the location of the new transmission line throughout the city and noted this easement is a
fifteen year easement and it differs from other locations in the right-of-way in that, should the City
request the relocation of that line within that fifteen years, it would be at the City's cost.
Karen Cumbo, Planning, Development, and Transportation Director, stated Public Service Company
has been pursuing acquisition of the easement on the private property at the northwest corner of
Harmony and Shields via eminent domain and a hearing has been scheduled for May 14. She
thanked Council for considering the item in order to allow resolution prior to that date.
Councilmember Cunniff noted the Environmental Impacts section of the staff report does not
address actual environmental impacts.
Councilmember Troxell stated there have been.a number of discussions relating to environmental
impacts regarding this project and stated Xcel has given over $2 million to the City's Natural Areas
program in addition to the mitigation. Richter confirmed that information and added this shift to the
right-of-way would eliminate surface damage if it is bored within the roadway.
Councilmember Troxell expressed support for the item, particularly in light of the eminent domain
issue. He commended the City Manager and staff for addressing the item with Xcel.
Mayor Pro Tern Horak made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Cunniff, to adopt Ordinance
No. 068, 2013, on First Reading.
Mayor Pro Tern Horak thanked Councilmember Troxell for bringing this issue forward and
commended staff for work on the item.
Councilmember Cunniff agreed this is a better solution.
The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: Weitkunat, Overbeck, Troxell, Cunniff, Campana,
Poppaw and Horak.. Nays: none.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Executive Session Authorized
Mayor Pro Tern Horak made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Cunniff, that the Council go
into Executive Session for the purpose of meeting with the City Attorney, City Manager, and other
affected members of the City staff to discuss potential litigation and related legal issues as permitted
under Section 2-31(A)(2) of the City Code.
Councilmember Cunniff asked if public comment could be entertained regarding this item. City
Attorney Roy replied the rules indicate each agenda item allows one opportunity for citizen input.
m
Apri129, 2013
The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: Overbeck, Troxell, Cunniff, Campana, Poppaw, Horak
and Weitkunat. Nays: none.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
The meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Adjournment
WIN
39