Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES-01/02/1969-Regular229 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, Held /4/ 7u co Thursday, beeemblr 2, 1969, at 1:30 o'clock P.M. Present: Councilmen Carson, 'Troxell, Kissock, Kruchten and Bennett. City Manager Coffey, City Attorney March and Director of Public Works Liquin. Motion was made by Councilman Kissock, seconded by Councilman Kruchten, that the reading of the minutes of the last regular meeting held December 26, 1968, be dispensed with. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Carson, Troxell, Kissock, Kruchten and Bennett. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following ordinance was presented on second reading: �14 ORDINANCE NO. 57, 1968 BEING AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING THE SUM OF $98,000 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1968 FOR WATER CAPITAL IMPRO V.EMENTS Motion was made by Councilman Troxell, seconded by Councilman Kruchten, that Ordinance No. 57, 1968, be adopted and become a law upon passage. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Carson, Troxell, Kissock, Kruchten and Bennett. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following ordinance was presented on second reading: �04, ORDINANCE NO. 58, 1968 BEING AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO Motion Was made by Councilman Kissock, seconded by Councilman Troxell, that Ordinance No. 58, 1968, be adopted and become a law u pon passage. Roll was callIed resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Carson, Troxell, Kissock, Kruchten and Bennett. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following ordinare was presented on first xm ding: ORDINANCE NO. 1, 1969 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, 1958, AS AMENDED, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND CLASSIFY- ING FOR ZONING PURPOSES THE PROPERTY INCLUDED IN THE SMITH ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO Attorney James Beatty, representing Robert Smith, called on Professional Planner Gene Allen who gave a very fine statement why this area should be zoned as request ed. Attorney John Kochenberger, representing a group of neighbors, called John 0. Richard of 1305 Skyline, James R. Goodman of 1313 Skyline Drive, Planning Consultant of Nelson, Haley, Patterson and Quirk, Bob Reitzman of 2021 Clubhouse Drive of Greeley and Stephan Peranki, 1865 Michael Lane, in opposition to the zoning of this property. After considerable discussion among the attorneys, Attorney Kochenberger stated he objected to the notices as,presented by our Planning and Zoning Board in rezoning this property, also both attorneys agreed to wager the swearing in of any called witnessess. After this discussion, the Council requested a 10 minute recess, after which the following letters were presented and read at length: 1827 Michael Lane December 30, 1968- Fort Collins City Council 300 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado Gentlemen: As adjacent property owners to the 4.6 acres at 1717 W, Prospect being considered for annexation under Planned Residential zoning, we are strongly opposed to this possible 230 January 2,1969 action. We regret that, due to prior committments, we are out of town at the time of this hearing. The people of the Fort Collins area have a lack of confidence in the public interests being protected by current planning and zoning procedures. Where people ask, can one build or buy a home in Fort Collins with reasonable assurance that the surrounding neighborhood will remain a single family residential area? Public confidence in planning and zoning has eroded because of lack of responsiveness to the citizenry. It is time for the City Council to evaluate the situation, and seek means to restore public confidence. The "Plan for Piegress" was adopted by the City Council as a guide for growth. The area of Southwest Fort Collins is shown as "low density". Now we are told by the former City Planner that "low density" means anything less than "high density". We question that public understanding of the "Plan for Progress" is based on a definition of "low density" other than the low density residential which now exists in the area. The Planning and Zonng Commission seems to believe that "Planned 4esidential" (12 units/acre max) is suitable anywhere in Fort Collins. Is this the City Councals- position also? The property under question is surrounded on three sides by land either devel- oped as low density or zoned for low density. One side is still farming, but will also bae apartments if this request is approved. Densities of 12 units per acre are not compatible with the neighborhood. Over 907o of those living within 500 feet of the property signed petitions against Dr. Smith's requested zoning. If this zoning is approved, precedent for multiple family units will be estab- lished in the Taft Hill -Prospect area. The City Council is making a decision;now on several sections of land, not just 4.6 acres. If approved, the many apartment dwellers will demand, and probably receive commercial developments to serve their needs. Is this area where the Council wants more commercial development to further drain the down- town? The spokesman for this petition claim no increase in density over what would be permittd under County FA zoning. If the City Council succombs to this threat, per- cg:atives of good planning will be lost for the entire region! We ask that the City Council take a long serious look at what approval of this petition will do for public confidence and future possibilities for good planning in the community. Respectfully yours, /s/ Sanford B. Thayer Wyona B. Thayer To the Members of the Fort Collins City Council I would like to go on record as opposing the annexation of 4.6 acres at 1717 West Prospect St., which would permit the construction of an apartment complex. I don't believe you as City Council members should ignore the desires of many to satisy the desire of one individual. You are elected represent the people as a whole. The building of an apartment complex would tax the school facilities of the area and gener- ally lower property values of property adjacent to them. Please consider the desires of the neighborhood before permitting this annexa- tion. /s/ Marvin D. Cooper 1412 Shamrock Drive January 1, 1968 1413 Shamrock Dr. City Council Fort Collins, Colorado To Whom it May Concern: This letter is to express our feeling of opposition in the zoning matter of 1717 West Prospect. Our desire is to leave this area as a single family residential area and not let the annexation of the proposed planned residential for apartment building go into effect. City Council Fort Collins, Colorado Gentlemen, /s/ Clayton and Leatrice Seims 1413 Shamrock Drive January 1, 1969 1405 Skyline Dr We wish to go on record as opposing the annexation and rezoning request of Dr. Robert Smith, pertaining to 4.6 acres at 1717 W. Prospect St. This property joins our single family residential neighborhood, and we feel annex- ation to the detriment of present residents cannot be justified. Sincerely, /s/Mr. & Mrs. Thomas M. Frisby. 231 Jauary 2, 1969 January 2, 1969 The Fort Collins City Council: We would like to express our opposition to the proposed zoning at 1717 West Prospect. As property owners in an adjaniing area we are concerned that the neighborhood remain a single family residential area. We believe that the City Council should be influenced by the expressed opinions of hundreds of residents opposing such a zoning request. /s/ Howard W. Nelson Elsie M. Nelson 1416 Shamrock Drive January 1, 1969 Fort Collins City Council City Hall Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 Gentlemen: This letter is written concern with the proposed annexation of the property of Dr. Robert Smith of 1717 West Prospect. We are against zoning and annexation of this type of property because of future conjestion of traffic, schools and the constant moving in and our of this type of housing. Our property is across the street from this address and we feel that not only would this type of construction make the appearance of the neighborhood less desirable, but it would also lower the property value of homes and make our schools become over crowded with the addition of more families that this type of housing has to offer. In view of all this, we are in support of those who are against the zoning and annexation of this type of building. Sincerely, /s/ Fredrick D. Galyardt Patsy L. Galyardt 1509 Skyline Drive Fort Collins, Colorado January 1, 1969 City Council of Fort Collins Gentlemen: I am writing this letter on behalf of my husband and myself to let. it be known that we would prefer to maintain a single family residential neighborhood in the area surrounding our property at 1304 Shamrock Drive. We are referring to the specific property proposed at 1717 West Prospect, 150 apartment dwellings, proposed by Dr. Robert Smith. One of the appealing features of Fort Collins has been the ability to enjoy country living, without traveling great distances to do it. There are needs for apartment houses in the community, but their locations should be decide( with great care, as I feel our Council will give this matter. Larger cities have their tall apartment dwellings in downtown areas and consider the school locations as well, in the planning. Do ".hope our Council will be concdrned in these matters and conclude the Prospect location is not a feasible location for so many apartments. Thank you,. /s/ Mrs. Arthur E. Deines 1304 Shamrock Drive Motion was made by Councilman Kissock, seconded by Councilman Troxell, that Ordinance No. 58, 1968, be withdrawn for reconsideration. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Carson, Troxell, Kissock, Kruchten and Bennett. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. ow Fol]/ing this, motion was made by Councilman Kruchten, seconded by Councilman Troxell, that Ordinance No. 58, 1968, be tabled for one week. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Carson, Troxell, Kissock, Kr-u;.chten and Bennett. Naye None. The President declared the motion adopted. After further comments by those opponents and proponents, motion was made by Councilman Troxell, seconded by Councilman Bennett, that Ordinance No. 1, be tabled for one week. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Carson, Troxell, Kissock, Kruchten and Bennett. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. 232 January 2,_1969 The folkwing ordinance was presented on first reading: ORDINANCE NO. 2, 1969 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY Motion was made by Councilman Bennett, seconded by Councilman.Kissock, tht Ordinance No. 2, 1969, be considered favorably on first reading and ordered published this 2nd day of January, A. D. 1969, and to be presented for final passage on the 23rd day of January, A. D. 1969. Roll was called resultfrg as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Carson, Troxell, Kissock, Kruchten and Bennett. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following bid was presented and read at length: December 31, 1968 TO: Mr. Tom Coffey City Manager FROM: H. L. Diener Purchasing Agent RE: Purchase of Cable Reel Trailer We received two bids for the Reel Trailer mentioned above. These bids were opened at 10:00 A.M. this morning. I have listed them below: Truco Denver 3,679.99 f.o.b. Denver Elder Trailer and Body 4,875.00 f.o.b. Long Beach Others were asked to bid but could not meet our specifications. The low bid (Truco Denver) meets our specifications. The other bid has some exceptions to our specification A copy of each bid is attached for your information. I recommend that we accept the low bid and proceed with the purchase from Truco. /s/ H. L. Diener Purchasing Agent Motion was made by Councilman Kissock, seconded by Councilman Bennett, that the recommendation of the Purchasing Agent be accepted. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Carson, Troxell, Kissock, Kruchten and Bennett. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following resolution was presented and read at length: RESOLUTION bill OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS COMMENDING MILES F. HOUSE FOR HIS SERVICES TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS WHEREAS, Miles F. House served as City Clerk of the City of Fort Collins from August 16, 1937, through December 31, 1968, and also during said time served as Assistant Director of Finance from April 12, 1955, to January 1, 1962, and as Director of Finance from January 1, 1962, to January 1, 1966; and WHEREAS, said Miles F. House in his official capacities as City Clerk, Assistant Director of Finance and Director of Finance performed his duties in such a conscientious, faithful and capable manner for the City of Fort Collins and the citizens thereof that appropriate recognitaion should be made thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that Miles F. House be and he hereby is commended for his valuable services to the City of Fort Collins during the period August 16, 1937, through December 31, 1968; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be spread upon the minutes of the City Council of the City of Fort Collins and a certified copy thereof be delivered to said Miles F. House. /a/ Karl E. Carson Mayor ATTEST: /s/ Alvin Kruchten /s/ John Bartel Harry E. t roxell City Clerk Thomas W. Bennett John J. Kissock Arthur E. March --233 January 2_,_1969 Motion was made by Councilman Carson, seconded by Councilman Troxell, that this resolution be adopted. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Carson, Troxell, Kissock, Kruchten and Bennett. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. Motion wa,s made by Councilman Kissock, seconded by Councilman Bennett, that the CoO.ncil adjourn. Roll was:icalled resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Carson, Troxell, Kissock, Kruchten and Bennett. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted and the Council adjourned. % r ATTEST: ty Clerk //