HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES-08/03/1972-Regularlot
August 3, 1972
MINUTES OF MEETING '}
August 3, 1972
The City Council of the City of Fort Collins met in regular section at 7:30 P.M. in the.Council
Chambers of the Municipal Building on Thursday, August 3, 1972
Present: Councilmen:
Karl E. Carson
Wm. Lopez
Mabel Preble
Charles Peterson
J. W. N. Fead
Also: Michael DiTullio Acting City Manager
Arthur March, Jr., Assistant City Attorney
Roy Bingman, City Engineer
Don Reynolds, Planning Director
Charlie Cain, Director of Finance
Verna Lewis, City Clerk
DISPENSING OF MINUTES
Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Preble, to dispense with the
reading of the minutes of the last regular meeting held July 27, 1972. The motion carried.
AGENDA ITEM 2Av 2B
RENEWAL OF FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE BY SAFEWAY
425 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE $ 105 WEST PROSPECT
Report:
On July 12, 1972, the above two establishments made application for renewal of their 3.2%
Fermented Malt Beverage Licenses.
On July 30, 1972, this officer received the applications for review.
This officer checked the records of the Fort Collins Police Department and could.find no
violations on record for either establishment. Therefore, this officer can find no reason
to recommend denial of this renewal application.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Jerrold J. Haals
Detective Bureau
/s/ Ralph M. Smith
Chief of Police
Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that these renewals be
approved. The motion carried.
AGENDA ITEM 2C
RENEWAL OF FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE LICENSE BY
_.CITY DUMP BAR, 162 Linden Street
REPORT:
On July 27, 1972, the above mentioned business made application for renewal of their 3.2%
Fermented Malt Beverage License.
On July 30, 1972, this officer received the application for review.
In checking the records of the Fort Collins Police Department, this officer finds that this
establishment operated for 20 days without a valid license. (See copy of Case #108837
attached.) Other than the violation cited, this officer can find no reason for denial.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Jerrold J. Haals
Detective Bureau
Assistant City Attorney Arthur March, Jr., said this establishment had been closed for two
weeks when they realized that their license had expired 20 days hence, and had operated for
20 days without a license.
Mayor Carson asked that the City keep a tickler file so the City Clerk will know the operation
date.
After further discussion, motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Fead,
that this matter be tabled until the owner appears and gives an explanation. The motion
carried.
i
I
August 3, 1972
AGENDA ITEM 3A
ORDINANCE NO. 39, 1972
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS BY CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY
After discussion, motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Peterson,
that Ordinance NO. 39, 1972, be approved and adopted.' The motion carried.
AGENDA ITEM 3B
ORDINANCE NO. 44, 1972
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OFTHE CITY OF FORT COLLINS,
COLORADO, 19S8, AS AMENDED, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND CLASSIFYING FOR ZONING
PURPOSES THE PROPERTY INCLUDED IN THE WARREN SHORES FIRST ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS
Motion was made by Councilman Preble, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that Ordinance No. 44, 1972
be adopted. The motion carried.
AGENDA ITEM 3C
ORDINANCE NO. 45, 1972
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS,
COLORADO, 19S8, AS AMENDED, COMMONLY MOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND CLASSIFYING FOR
ZONING PURPOSES THE PROPERTY INCLUDED IN THE POPPELL ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS,
COLORADO
Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman Fead, that Ordinance No. 45,
1972, be adopted. The motion carried.
AGENDA ITEM 3D
ORDINANCE
ORDINWElASSESSING THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS IN SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
NO. 56 AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT AND COLLECTION THEREOF
Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Preble, that Ordinance No. 50,
197;,be adopted. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative.
AGENDA ITEM 3E
ORDINANCE NO. 51, 1972
BEING AN ORDINANCE ASSESSING THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS IN SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
NO. 57, AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT AND COLLECTION THEREOF.
Motion was made by Councilman Preble, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that Ordinance No. 51,
1972, be adopted. Upon a roll call, the motion carried.
AGENDA ITEM 4A
ORDINANCE NO. 32, 1972
BEING AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF A MOTOR VEHICLE IN A DRIVEWAY OR ON PRIVATE
PROPERTY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER OR PERSON IN POSSESSION THEREOF, AND AMENDING ART--
ICLE XII OF CHAPTER 23 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY. OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO,
1958, AS AMENDED.
Councilman Lopez stated that in areas where there is a circular driveway, it is hard for
loading and unloading, if there are cars parked there, and are a detriment because of a
chance of a fire.
Acting City Manager Michael DiTullio said it is the responsibility of the owner to move his
vehicle, that there will not be a tow away so it will not be putting a hardship on the
Police.
Mayor Carson said if this is not effective, can reconsider later and expressed a hope that
it would not mean a lot of patrolling by the Police Department.
Assistant City Attorney March, Jr., stated that there could be a tow away of a vehicle, but
seldom. Mayor Carson said this needs a trial period.
Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Preble, that Ordinance No. 32,
1972, be approved oR first reading and presented for final passage on the 24th day of August
1972.. The motion carried.
AGENDA ITEM 4B
ORDINANCE NO. 53, 1972
ING AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE SALARY FOR THE ACTING CITY MANAGER
Motion was made by Councilman Preble, seconded by Councilman Fead, that Ordinance No. 53,
1972, be approved on first reading and presented on final/the 24th day of August, 1972. The
motion carried. passage
103
August_3, 1972
AGENDA ITEM 4C
ORDINANCE NO. S4, 1972 - Greenwalt Ninth Annexation
--BEING AN ORDINANCE ANNETI CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that Ordinance No. 54,
1972, be approved on first reading and to be presented for final passage on the 24th day of
August, 1972. The motion carried.
RESOLUTION 72-77
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT COLLINS GIVING NOTICE
CONCERNING A PROPOSED ORDINANCE jW ENDING CHAPTER 19 OF
TIIE CODIi OF ORDINANCES OF 'fllli CI9'1` OF P01',T C.OLI,INS,
COLORADO, 195S, AS A'IENDED, C01,VIONLY KNOT;N AS THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, IN ORDER TO CLASSIFY I.Olt ZONING PURPOSES
CERTAIN PROPERTY ItEI?:G ANNF:XFD TO Till: CITY OF FORT COLLINS
MiEREAS, heretofore the City Council of the City of Fort Collins
initiated annexation procedures for certain property known as the
Greemaalt Ninth
Annexation to the City of Fort Collins, more
particularly described in the "Notice of Public Hearing" attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board has made a study of said
annexation and has held a hearing and made a report and recommendation con-
cerning the zoning for said property, all in accordance with Section 19-46
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, 1958, as
amended; and
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Board has recommended that said
property be zoned in the R-L, Low Density Residential
the Zoning Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins; and
District under
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to hold a hearing in order to
determine how said property shall be zoned, all as 'required by said
Section 19-46.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FORT COLLINS that August 24 1972, at 1:30 P. M., or as soon thereafter
as the matter may come on for hearing, in the Council Chambers in the City
Ball of the City of Fort Collins is hereby set as the time and place for a
public hearing in order to consider the zoning for said property; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby instructed
1.
to publish a notice of said hearing as provided in Section 19-46 of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, 1958, as amended,
in the form attached hereto.
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting.of the City Council held .
3rd day of August, A.D. 1972.
/s/ Karl E. Carson
...... ...... .
Mayor
ATTEST:
/s/ Verna Lewis
City Clerk
st 3, 1972
Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Preble, that this resolution
be adopted. The motion carried.
AGENDA ITEM 5A
PARKLAND FEE
Michael DiTullio, Acting City Manager, presented a report on Park Land Fee which was
requested by the Council at the May 25, 1972, meeting, and was read at length by the City
Clerk. ( Recorded in Central Files).
Mayor Carson asked for discussion on this matter.
Those in the audience speaking in favor of the increase of parkland fee from $40.00 to $195.00
were:
Gustav A. Swanson, Vice -President Poudre Valley Greenbelt Asso., 620 Mathews
James Cox
Harry Troxell,
Martell Nusbaum
148 Harvard
629 Armstrong
3816 County Road 9
Gary Haxton, representing Everitt Enterprises, said he was not speaking against
this proposal, but fblt they should be given credit for providing open green belt areas
and park areas on.the development on Lemay and Drake, that it covered three square miles.
He said that this park area alleviated the pressure on other parks and the developers
should be encouraged to provide this and to pay this $195.00 park fee would be too much
of a burden on the home owner. It was the opinion of the Council that if these parks were
for public use and not just for the people who live in these areas, that they should be
given credit.
Walter Peterson, 630 Peterson, Bernie Cain, 1228 Constitution, Lela Heiger, of the
Associated University Women organization, Norman Illsley, 209 Allen, Alvin Miller, 1316
Burch, Joe Coria, 230 North Grant, and Charles:Sheperdson, all spoke in favor of the
parkland fee.
There was some discussion on what consideration would be given the trailer pads, since
they are more economical. It was stated that everyone who hooks onto the City Utilities
are liable forthis fee.
Gary Haxton stated that they furnish approximately 32 acres of open space out of 160
acres and reiterated 'that they should be given credit for this.
Mayor Carson stated there could be room for exploration of this idea and there were others
who expressed that some basis for credit be allowed for parks provided by developers, and
Mr. March, Jr., Assistant City Attorney said only if they can be used for the public. He
said he would have an ordinance next week on this matter.
It was suggested that this be made retroactive and if it was possible to make a moratorium.
Mr. March, Jr, stated that if it was contested in court he did not think it would be
upheld.
After further discussion, motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman
Fead, that the City Attorney prepare an emergency ordinance approving this park fee. The
motion carried.
Discussion followed concerning trailers. Mr. DiTullio, Acting City Manager, stated that
trailers did pay the fee according to law for hooking on water and sewer.
Mayor Carson stated he thought that those who already have committments are exempt from
this fee, and that the legal ramifications be worked out by next Thursday.
A citizen in the audience stated she thought there should be a first and second reading
and the City not set a precedent for other Councilman.
Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that the legal aspects of
this be resolved and initiate an ordinance. Upon a roll call, the motion carried.
Ci�ysk POtrney Arthur March, Jr., said he would make this an emergency ordinance and the
Council can reject or accept it.
AGENDA ITEM SB
SCOTCH PINES SUBDIVISION, SECOND FILING.
Don Reynolds, Planning Director, explained that this subdivision was on Drake Road almost
to Stover with recreatinnal:£acilities. Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded
by Councilman Preble, that this Subdivision be approved. The motion carried.
AGENDA ITEM SC
August 3,-1972
REVISED SUBDIVISION PLAT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR HILL POND ON SPRING CREEK
Don Reynolds said this was on the east side of Shields Street in the RP zone, and an open
area would be provided. Motion was made by Councilman Preble, seconded by Councilman
Peterson, that this be approved.. The motion carried.
Councilman Lopez asked Planning Director to get a general plan showing how much open space
there was planned.
AGENDA ITEM SD
STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 66
Report of City Engineer:
FROM: Roy A. Bingman, City Engineer
RE: Consolidated Street Improvement District No. 66 (Including Street
Lighting)
The City Council has previously received a report from the Director
of Public Works, regarding the advisability of installing paving, curb,
gutter and sidewalk on East Elizabeth Street from Stover to Lemay. Based
on the 40 foot width from curb to curb and including drive -over curb, gutter
and sidewalk, the estimate for such paving is as follows: ;
Elizabeth Street between Stover Street and Lemay Avenue (40 foot wide
pavement):
Assessable frontage: 3,716.44 feet
Total estimated construction cost: $43,493.00
Estimated
construction cost per front foot:
$11.00
per foot
Estimated
cost per front foot (including 17%):
$12.87
per foot
Estimated
City expense:
$5,011.00
In order to proceed with the improvement district, it is necessary for
the City Council to adopt the plans, specifications and cost estimates for
the district, and publish notice of the district.
It is also necessary to provide for the administrative expense of
processing the district. The following are recommended percentages of the
total cost to cover each portion of the expense:
Engineering: 6%
Legal and publication: 2%
Interest during construction: 4%
Collection and certification to county: 5%
Total: 17%
In addition, the Council must set forth the period over which the cost
of the improvement may be paid and the rate of interest which will be carried
with the installments. It is recommended that these be ten years and 6 percent.
RESOLUTION 72-78
Res fully sub ted,
Roy A. kngman Q
City Engineer
'`F T1' . CIL OF '1?3i C'I' ' OP F 1 CCLLI;iS "00P I:•;G
Tj % .`T OI= T is CI1,' El;i;I; iii: C'! T1Oi .TiST.i".^.1TiS GY1GI
ND ASSLSS7:1Aif i FOR STR EL I1'S'RO`Tl-EiiI' DISTP.ICI' 170. 66,
APPP MINU "ME DIETAILS ik'ND SPI.CIFICATIONS FOR SuQ:
PROPOSY"' DISTRICT, DETER`?ININC 'DE iIV0LMI OR PRO; IM'
OF 1 f LE TOTi L COST TO F.•i: P-41) BY A N F.nIUD OTtIER T11AN
,V2SESS'1171TS iV7iUNTS`t F!'f)P) r.7Y IN 1i1i DISTRICT 'i:TE
i)J 11T: TIiv; WITHIN B°IIC7I ii{I
J.PG
August 3, 1972
,.
1,:.v1 'J.' ..... ._. ... ..,. .. .i='r �....,.'ri.0
T -
- L, T'l';
: 0 t .'.'',It.) I—S T. I.L 112 I'S, '1;1i PMP :RIY
TO lit.: ' n ' !. 'no 1 .TlinJ 1.
1SMSS.* MITI, AM it a sRATE x I1L'i 11E COI WCIL
WILL iiGT') . :!.::i't .it.' !':il.i n(l.'iSlilTal (l„');'h.`' 3Y )RI)Ii -
nvq.1. �� - " 1111` l
the City fAl'u .C:ll by T3SO1Lltior. dircctea the
City i2ig -icor to ➢ia,,c a c0;iij lcte survey Of proI-osod Street ImprOvomcat
i)15tTict `:o. 6c3, iilCliUli;a' L''1C; j1r0'iaratl0;1 Of a i:i :1', glans and specifications,
a1C1 CSC.L''1atC OF CGSt O: t,le i)!:Prov0`101itS 1a, Said WPM& district; and
l LL;& :/i ) ,: City 1 nl ,(T . v-,or has mza ) s ro: 1 lc 1iJ ..fort .e cl has presented
the details and specifications for tRe proposed. district.
!a01Y, T S PSiFORL, BE IT 11Y 'Dfl7 COli`df;IL OF 111 CITY OF
PORT COLLIE;:
Section 1. T!,.at the report, plans, SPOcifications, map and estimate
as presented by the City l'11ginocr for said district be 17ici t!10 stt^e hereby
arc accepted and ixpproved.
Section 2. Ito following al:nahort or proportio,c of tho total cost
Of SUS inprovUi2cltts Stall be paid, i)y ti:C C:Lt)r at larf�C : ^d not 1 ) s ss ,
y ���J Jl11Lnts
,galnst property in t-io district, "wit: City's share Of iotorsOction costs
In accordance with Section 15-64 and cost Of I'avovhy',' and roinstalling e;;1s-
ting curt.) and !,;uttor and other costs involved in. removing and relocating
1)ormanont irrprovemo.-,!LS in place allracd i�J.tel pl'OSOiltlY MiKin? street width,
$5,011.00 based On City Engineer's estimate.
Section 3. 'Ito pr0.,)C:rt✓ to Ito as80SSOC'c, for the illinroveoCn is
shall be as follows: all lots .,:cl lands abutting t1:C street :i0 igprovc:].
Section 4, ttiiSO;SSa;i771ts for the cost Of installing the inTroVe-
nl=s iil tb.0 district ",.,ill uO mad:` as follo1,S: Uoon all of tte lots and
11_e.1 tRC street 1-,)-midi ,,d Lld.il C.A.Gtrict in prciportion
'Ls Lit
e fro nt.:,;c. of each lot or tract of _and on the street is to the
frontage of all lots and lands on such street so ir:;,)roved, all as provided
in Section 15-63 and 15-64 of ttlo Code of Ordinance;.
Section 5. Said asscssmcnts shall be payable in Len (l0) equal
annual installii!cn ts, wit} interest Gin the unpaid installments at the rate
of six percc;lt (6T) per n�uun.
Section 6. Mat on the 7th day of Septoolor, 1972, at the flour
of 1:30 o'clock P.P%, or as soon thereafter as the matter may come on for
iCarllt�^„ 1.n tl;, council (,,a.",bCrs Of is City Hall, City Of lbrt Collins)
1
is the date G:1 wnic . G1e Council Of the City Of Fort Collins will consider
the orderill3 by Ordiinancc Of d10 prOt.105Cd ilir)rove1::c2.its and hear all complaints
and Ob)ect'ion5 that Flay be We anti filed in •,%ritiItg concerning tlhe proposed
LT1)roVCl1,Cl1ts by tit'. CVVlrlcv; Of any real estate to be aSSCSsod of any persons inter-
ostCd galerally.
In-e� f-11 ) o 8
-4 C 1
Welch Street between Prospect Road
and Stuart Street 9.14319
Clover Lane between LaPorte Avenue
and a point 428 feet nort;ierly 11.55809
Elizabeth Street between 150 feet east
of Lemay Avenue and idchugn Street,
excluding south side betweeen 150 feet
east of Lemay Avenue and the alley east
of Lune Street and including adjoining
Mchugn Street between Riverside Drive
and a point 200 feet east of Patton
Street 13.33354
Alley bounded by Laurel Street, Plum
Street, Remington Street and College
Avenue (Block 127) 3.71596
t 3, 1972
10.36
11.05
13.81
4.19
It is recommended that the improvements constructed under Street
Improvement District No. 64 be accepted by the City Council. The assess-
ment roll for the District is enclosed, indicating the cost to each property.
The Finance Department will furnish the amount to be added for interest to
certification.
RESOLUTION 72-79
Res tfully submitted,
Roy A(Bingman
City Engineer
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS ACCEPTING THE
IMPROVEMENTS IN CONSOLIDATED STREET PAVING AND STREET
LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 64, ADOPTING THE REPORT OF THE CITY
ENGINEER RESPECTING THE COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID
DISTRICT AND THE SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING
NOTICE TO BE PUBLISHED BY THE CITY CLERK OF THE ASSESS-
MENTS TO BE MADE IN SAID DISTRICT, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CHAPTER IS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS, COLORADO, 1958, AS AMENDED
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported to the City Council
that the improvements in Consolidated Street Paving and Street Lighting
District No. 64 have been completed and has recommended that said improve-
ments be accepted; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared a statement in accord -
ante with the provisions of Section 15-67 of the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, 1958, as amended, showing the whole
cost of the improvements in said District; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has further, in accordance with said
Section, prepared an assessment roll; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the reports of the City
Engineer and desires to accept the same and advertise and give notice of
proposed assessments in accordance with the provisions of Section 15-68
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, 1958, as
amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
1;� 4_a� fo-� /09
'T`S
Soctibil 7. 1`aC CiLy 15 c:arf Cct&!
r:Ot1.CC i)Y T�il�I1C2110ii. .;ali" t0 'L:1L i".:1C15 !)i. "arOli:�i'CV '-0
and to all 11lterc,—,Lc1 )i;T'_:OII rvti::Crall'y, all a3 3Ct ror%ii in ..Cctl.Oil IS-
6 of '..!ic Lode Ot '.i:i'.la^�tCC:5 Of ti;i' Ci.t )F :Ol't C.OIl �i5,
as ai eilclod.
i35S Cti ffiU1 tl:'.(lp t2li J:C a aal' T�:i'i:i;_ ;f', O:F 'i.i .... ,,: tv .:U;.^,iC].l held
ulis 3rii clay of 1,u; List, 1972.
/s/ Karl E. Carson
Mayor
ATTEST:
/s/ Verna Lewis
City Clerk
Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Preble, that this resolution
be adopted. The Motion carried.
AGENDA ITEM SE
FINAL REPORT STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 64
FROM: Roy A. Bingman, City Engineer
RE: Costs for Street Improvement District No. 64
Tile construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk and street surfacing nas
been completed for Street Improvement District No. 64. Tne total construction
cost was �61,865.S3; the estimated construction cost was $65,765.00. The
cost of engineering, legal, etc. is to be added to the construction cost
in the amount of 17 percent. Tile following is a breakdown of the costs for
Street Improvement District No. 64:
Contract construction cost: $61,865.53
Arterial street paving cost: 2,240.86
Contract construction cost --less arterial 59,624.67
street paving cost: .00
Cost of street lights for tile District: $61,1,50000 .00
124
17 percent engineering, legal, etc.: 10,391.18
Amount to be assessed to properties
within the District, including City's $71,S15.85
snare of intersection paving:
Tne following is a tabulation of the City cost for Improvement District
No. 64:
Intersection paving cost: $ 7S4.16
13,129:29
City property
13,883.45
Arterial street paving cost: 2,240'86
Total City cost: $16,124.31
The assessment rates (including 17 percent for engineering, legal, etc.)
for the streets within the District are as follows:
Actual Paving Estimated Paving
Project Location Assessment per Assessment per
Abutting'Foot Abutting Foot
Impala Drive between Mulberry and
a point 902 feet northerly (Soutil
line of Poudre Hign School) $3.26601** $S.46
** The construction cost per foot, excluding the cost for the additional
2 inches of base course, and including 17 percent for engineering, etc. for
the paving of Impala Drive is $5.66377. Poudre R-1 School District paid the
City $4,250.00 which reduces the assessment rate from $5.66377 per foot to
$3.26601 per foot.
.ems (l U
�0�
ar i
_ August 3, 1972
i
FORT COLLINS that the report of the City Engineer regarding the completion
of the improvements in Consolidated Street Paving and Street -Lighting Dis-
frict No. 64 be and the same hereby is accepted and the improvements in
said District are hereby accepted by the City Council; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the report of the City Engineer
regarding the whole cost of the improvements and the assessment roll
prepared by the City Engineer be and the same hereby are accepted, and
the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the owners of property to be
assessed and all persons interested generally that such improvements
have been completed and accepted. Such notice shall be made by publica-
tion once each week for two successive weeks in an official newspaper
published in the City of Fort Collins and by mailing notice, postage
prepaid, as first class mail, to the last known address of each last
known owner of property to be assessed, such addresses and owners being
those appearing in the real property assessment rolls for general taxes
in Larimer County, and such notice to be in accordance with the provisions
Of Section 15-68 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins,
Colorado, 1958, as amended.
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
held this 3rd day of August, A.D. 1972.
/s/ Karl E. Carson
ATTEST: Mayor
Zal Verna Lewis
City Clerk
Motion was made by Councilman Preble, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that this resolution
be adopted. The motion carried.
Assistant City Attorney March, Jr., advised the Council that the people who cannot pay the
amount of assessment in District No. 66, can have some dispensation with the City taking the
responsibility, the sprinkler that exists, two fences, trees and step on the Osborn property
is the City's responsibility. A citizen asked about stop lights on Morgan Street, and
as advised there was none planned for that location but an underground line would be installed
in case of a probable future use.
Bill Donovan, from C.S.U. was present complaining about the 3.2 Beer establishments serving
beer in chipped bottles.
Mr. Arvin Lovass expressed that the Planning and Zoning Department should consider the zoning
of the center of the City as well as the suburbs.
Stan Case, Utility Director, gave a report on the substation s to which the City desires to
purchase from Colorado State University. Mr. Case said that/an agreement can be reached on
access roads to CSU facilities west of Overland Trail near Mulberry and Elizabeth, that he
feels they might have a solution. He said he had met with them Thursday Morning and discus-
sed land use planning. He stated that the planning department work to get a planned entrance
to CSU, and that he would work as rapidly as possible.
Assistant City Attorney Arthur March, Jr., reported that in installing a sewer line across
the Webster property on Sugar Factory Lane, his property was not left as it was before , and
as he is bonded, this will have to be taken care of by the contractors. Motion was made
by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Preble, that the City Attorney be authorized to
start proceedings with the contractor. The motion carried.
4In
August 3, 1972
Mr. Frank McConnell, 2517 Stanford, asked if the Mayor had received a letter from Reverend
Roy Tompson regarding the retaining of Michael DiTullio as a permanent City Manager.
Mayor Carson said he had received this letter and would present it to the Council members
for all to see. Mr. McConnell said he felt that people that come from other places are not
as interested in the City as some within the state, Mayor Carson said this was an issue that
has to be decided by the Council.
Councilman Preble reported that 18 people were present on Wednesday night at the informal
talk session and some of the things discussed were poor maintenance of some city baseball
diamonds and horseshoe pits, complaints of speeding on East Drake Road and the possibility
of a noise ordinance. She asked the administration to look into these, and moved that the
Council continue the night meetings to be held the third;Thursday of the month. This was
seconded by Councilman Fead. The notion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that the Council adjourn.
The motion carried and the Council adjourned at 11:O9 P.M.
ATTEST:
City Clerk