Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES-07/27/1972-RegularP,2 July 27, 1972 MINUTES OF MEETING July 27,1972 The City Council of the City of Fort Collins met in regular session at 1:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building on Thursday, July 27, 1972. Present: Councilmen Carson Lopez, Preble Peterson Fead Mike DiTullio, Acting City Manager Arthur March, Sr.,City Attorney Arthur March, Jr. Assistant City Attorney_. Roy Bingman, City Engineer Donald Reynolds, Planning Director Charlie Cain, Director of Finance Verna Lewis, City Clerk DISPENSING OF MINUTES Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Preble, that the reading of the minutes of the last regular meeting held July 20, 1972, be dispensed with. The motion carried. 2. REPORT OF THE PRIORITIES COMMITTEE OF DT2 Reverend Charles Patchen, Chairman of the Priorites Committee, gave an oral report from the Committee and read the letter of June 14, 1972 at length. (Initiated in the Central Files). He also introduced the following members of the Committee who were present: 1. Murray Manley 2. Bonnie Titley 3. Buford Phlemons 4. Richard Sievers S. Val Ogden Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, to receive the report from the Priorities Committee and pursue implementation of the recommendations as rapidly as possible. Seconded by Councilman Preble. The motion carried. AGENDA ITEM 3A LIQUOR LICENSING AUTHORITY: RESOLUTION 72-74 G11 TI'J". COUNCIL OF TI-E CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLD, T vw), AGT4, 16 TI1L LOCAL ILcv IQLGR LIING ALA ORITY CONCERN- ING AN APPLICATION FOR A HOTEL PND RESTAUPWN7 LIQUOR LICENSE 'line application for Paxton's Pub, Ltd. for a hotel and Restaurant Liquor License cane on for hearing on the 20th day of July, 1972, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, Fort Collins, Colorado, pursuant to notice duly given as require d by law. The authority, having heard the evidence introduced at the hearing, and having examined the documents introduced and having heretofore held a preliminary hearing and issued findings in writing on said preliminary hearing, now makes the following findings: 1. Tho neighborhood to be served under this application is as defined in the prolurinary findings of tiie Authority. 2. Nothing contained in C.R.S., 1963, Section 75-2-39 prohibits the issuing of a license at tine proposed location. y 27, 1972 3. Mih! Cil%Iplp.c•all.;, are of „ood character and qualified under the Ordinances of file City o£ Fort ColiihIs and tie laws of the State of Colorado for the liccar;e a »lied for. 4. 'file application is in proper form. S. Petitions were presented and received at the hearing, ilhdica- th,7 a need for tho license am —,lied for and no e:videnec was presented. indi- cating that said need does not exist, and the local licensing authority hereby finds that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood require the issuance of the license applied for. o. The building in which tine license is to be operated is not r_cw constructed; and no license should issue until the construction is completed hi accordance with the plans and specifications submitted by the applicant and the requirements of the Building Inspector made in conformity . with the Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins. OF 'PEIE CO:,^CIL OF '111M CITY OF FORT COLLINS ACTING AS 'i:IL LOCAL LIQU011 LICEi4SI`:G IYU1110RITY CONCL:RIIING RN APPLICATION FOR A HOTEL Anil IZESTPITANT LIQUOR LICENSE. i% IT I ESCI ZI) by the Council of t1e City of Fort Collins, acting as the local liquor licensing authority that the application of Paxton's Pub, Ltd. for a Motel and '.estaurant Liquor License be and tine same hereby is C�ralhted in accordance frith Cie findihhgs of the. Authority set forth above; and '.3E 11' Ii i :Ii:ii M. S()1'i'I.il that said license shall not issue until the const'raction Of tihc licensed 1preittisos is coiiflpietod In accordarcc wit'i the pla:i5 al-ld specific tio;ls sUUI]itted to 'Line Authority aid th.e requlre- lile;Its OA. -C t:;C City Bui,eling, 13, :caor, and the Authority has received a report .reel `iah.J Buil"'Lv,,, Inspector flat said iiimrovemonts ;lav0 been co-oleted in aecordm—.co t;i:L';1 said pla;h_s a,.d specifications ands tho requirements of t1e Euildi.u; L•1 ,Doctor. Passcd euhd adopted this 27t1h day of July, A.D. 1972. .... ....... ....................................... . /s/ Karl E. Carson Mayor ATTEST:" /s/ Verna Lewis City Clerk Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that this resolution be adopted. The motion carried. RESOLUTION 72-7S OF TILE COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS SETTING FORTH FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS REGARDING THE HORSETOOTH ANNEXATION WHEREAS, annexation proceedings were heretofore initiated for lands to be known as the Horsetooth Annexation; and Julv 27. 1972 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution after notice given as required by law, the City Council has held a hearing on said Annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS: Section 1. That the City Council hereby finds that not less than one -sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the City of Fort Collins. Section 2. That the City Council further finds that'a community of interest exists between the territory proposed to be annexed and the City of Fort Collins, and the territory proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the nearfuture, and said territory is integrated or is capable of being integrated with the City of Fort Collins. Section 3. That the City Council further finds that none of the provisions of Section 139-21-4, Colorado Revised Statutes, 1963, as amended, are violated by the annexation. Section 4. That the City Council further finds that no election is required under the provisions of Section 139-21-6(2), and no additional terms and conditions are to be imposed in connection with this annexation. Section S. That the City Council concludes that the territory embraced in the Horsetooth Annexation is eligible for annexation to the City of Fort Collins and should be so annexed. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held this 27th day of July, A.D. 1972. fs/ Karl E. Carson Mayor ATTEST: /s/ Verna Lewis City Clerk Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman Fead, that this resolution be adopted. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 41, 1972 - Horsetooth Annexation BEING AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS Oral testimony on this annexation was given by Assistant City Attorney Arthur March, Jr., and Director of Planning, Donald Reynolds. Motion was made by Councilman Preble, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that Ordinance No. 41, 1972, be approved on first reading and presented on second reading on the 17th day of August, 1972. Motion carried. AGENDA ITEM 4B ORDINANCE NO. 42, 1972 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, 1958, AS AMENDED, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND CLASSIFYING FOR ZONING PURPOSES THE PROPERTY INCLUDED IN THE HORSETOOTH ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS. COLORADO Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Preble, that Ordinance No. 42, 1972, be approved on first reading and presented on final reading the 17th day of Autust, 1972. Motion carried. Pj 9.7.2 AGENDA ITEM 4C _ STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Oral testimony was given by Assistant City Attorney Arthur March, Jr., on the District, stating the Administration now recommends a 40 foot street in this District, rather than the 44 feet, originally recommended, in view of the communication with residents in the area. The ordinance provides that you cannot, after the property has been advertised in the District and after the notice has been sent to the property onwers, make material changes. in the plans of the Engineers. If the Council agree with the Administration that the 44 feet street not be built, then by motion the Council can delete that street from the District and go ahead with the District. Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, to delete Elizabeth Street from the District #65 and proceed with the rest of the District. This was seconded by Councilman Fead. The motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. S2, 1972 BEING AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CREATION AND ORGANIZATION OF CONSOLIDATED STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 65, PROVIDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS THEREIN, AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS TO PAY THE COSTS OF CONSTRUCTION THEREOF Remonstrances were made on this district from the following: William H. Allen July 24, 1972 Capt. Raymon M. White, Jr. June 22, 1972 Sam $ Nadine Bush June 26, 1972 Motion was made by Councilman Preble, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that Ordinance No. 52, 1972, be approved and presented on final reading August 17, 1972. The motion carried. A report was given the Council on Elizabeth Street by Acting City Manager Michael DiTullio as a result of two prior meetings. Report of the Director of Public Works: RE: City Initiated Improvement District -East Elizabeth Street On June 14, 1972, I submitted a memo to the City Council that plans were being prepared for Street Improvement District No. 65 and that other than the streets petitioned for,. I was recommending the paving of Fuqua Drive from Prospect to Lake aad East Elizabeth Street from Stover to Lemay. I pointed out at that time that the existing paving was not adequate for the traffic volume that is present. Based on tais recommendation, the City Engineer designed and pre- sented to the City Council, for their approval, plans and specifications calling for a 44 foot width paving on East Elizabeth Street. These plans were approved at that time and Consolidated Street Improvement District No. 65 was initiated. During recent weeks, the need for a 44 foot pavement on East Elizabetn Street has heea questioned oy tine property owners in tnat area and the Administration, after a tnorougn study of existing traffic volumes, future traffic -generating areas and other pertinent data, feel that a four -lane street would not be justified on tais portion of East Elizabeth. This section of City street then falls under the criteria of a typical resi- dential street. The Standard Specifications for a residential street in new subdivisions, as adopted by the City Council, calls for a 40 foot pavement width. On the east side of Stover and Elizabeth Street intersec- tion the curb radius is installed at 40 feet. There exists curbs on this street whic❑ are 36 1/2 feet apart. We have met with the property owners in the area and they feel that the street should not be reconstructed to a width wider than that of existing curus. East Elizabeth Street, due to traffic volumes, maintenance problems and safety cons id erat ions, does need to be paved and I recommend that an Improvement District be formed to pave it at whatever width the City Council determines. Respectfully submitted, Charles Liquin Director of Publit Works Memo from Traffic Engineer: MINIMUM DESIRABLE STREET WIDTES 1rom the standpoint of the Traffic Engineering Division the 00h of Qrcets are of treat importance in the safe and expaditious movement of traffic. following information taken from the Traffic Engineers Handbood is subwittcd to substantiate the need for adiquite space between curbs. This information has been compiled from extensive studies throughout the country by the Institute of Traffic Engineers and sets forth the criteria for desirable design o, streets and highways. It has been established that the average motors t will not travel clo5cr than 2.5 feet from fixed objects on the right and will require the samo T,w the left side for approaching vehicles. This is the minimum space, however the desirable space is 6 feet. The width of the average vehicle is 6 feet and the width of trucks is 8 feet. If the minimum space traveled is added to vehicles then the lane should be 11.5 feet and the space for trucks would be 13 feet. Therefore it is desirable to have 12 foot lanes for one direction Of traffic. Now take into consideration parallel parking, here again the space TG-c vehicles would have to be 8 feet for parking and 10 feet for trucks, hoxcv;;: in most. instances 8 feet for parallel parking is the alocated s ace. Tho rcvbonin,; being that trucks will not be parking in residential areas for periods oth„r than those for loading and deliveries. If the totals of the spaces mentioned above are calculated for. a ,.v&; with two directions of traffic and la.rall.el parking on both sides in a rnr]Q ntic.. ne:iGhborhocd the width from curb to curb will be a minimum of 40 feet, if a lesser width is available there parking woud have to be remov d on'one side or both rides depending on the space from curb to curb. It is my experiance that when a street has had the parking elimi pw& on one or both :;ides the speed of :,lie vohiclvs will increase due to the !Let V"'L the fixed objects on the right of the m terc3t are gone ana he has a 3zun O: Giant distance. With this increased sight distanco comes a greater pr l:La-fL.0 :LC s1ced than is posted. If a RADAR speed study is then made and the 85 percunt:ile speed in ;-seater than the posted speed there are two altcroaLivzs. Ono hair,,; extensive law enforcement of the posted speed or two raise the speed liiai 4, to the 85 pc:rccnl:i..l.c r1mcd. or that 5 mils per hour incrumc',it closcst to t:,;_ 85 perccntilo level. Also in arean where the parking has been :removud One n:lde ani 'the residents and. their Cu,!st: use the onztreot slacu n, It incuroacs jaywalking which creates another problem and hazard not only to the pedowirian but to the moto-rest traveling that street. Therefore in residential areas if parking is allowed on both sides of the street it will tend to hold the speed of the motorest at a more reasonable level. /s/ Joe Rice Traffic Engineer Letters from the following were presented and read: (Initiated in Central Files). Paula Jann Benson July 20, 1972 Sanford Kern July 25, 1972 Richard 0. Hayes July 2S, 1972 Carol B. Hayes July 25, 1972 Ramond P. Mecherl Undated Maxine Kern July 20, 1972 Two petitions of remonstrance. Mayor Carson then opened the matter for discussion from the floor. Speaking in opposition were the following: Raymond P. Mecherle Dave Osborn Ben Olds Robert Kelman Dr. Glen Sundquist Don McMillen Jean Kelman David Croker Barbara Gorshing Richard Hayes Robert M. Conlon 801 E. Elizabeth 808 E. Elizabeth 1312 Robertson 726 E. Elizabeth 121 North Grant 1312 Robertson 800 E. Elizabeth' 709 E. Elizabeth 700 E. Elizabeth 725 E. Elizabeth I c,7 Petition for initiation of an Improvement District was read at length. (31 signatures) The Assistant City Attorney then instructed the Council on the procedure of either accept- ing the recommendation of the Public Works Director and that the Council set the street width, or to accept the petition for initiation of an Improvement District from the resi- dents of East Elizabeth Street. Motion was made by Councilman Preble to accept the recommendation of the Director of Public Works and instruct him to prepare a district with 40 foot street width. This was seconded by Councilman Carson. Motion carried unanimously. Motion was made by Councilman Preble, to reject the petition of the property owners for the formation of a Street Improvement District. Seconded by Councilman Peterson. The motion carried. RESOLUTION 72-76 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS ACCEPTING A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REGARDING THE INITIATION OF A SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, STATING THE NEED FOR THE NATURE OF, AND THE LOCATION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE, DESCRIBING THE AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR THE SAME, AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND PRESENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE NECESSARY INFORMATION FOR THE FORMATION OF SAID DISTRICT. 10I PEAS, the Director Oi Public 1'a'Jr1':s i;as recorm:eided to the City Cout-icil ticat a special ivlprovc:nent district be created for the purpose of installi:ir, certain pui)lic irprmiemt.its in the City, and 11d U:iZiP ;, the City Council Ims received such rcconn:=dation and desires to continuo with do £omation of suds special irprovement dis- trict. ,1CIv, 71 J:PEIOIv2, BE IT P1SOL1'"ii;) BY TIM COi1NCIL OF MIE CITY OF F037 COLLETS: Section 1. iat the reeoru.•:endation of the Director of Public Works is l eroby rocc ivod and iccoptexl. Section 2. 'i1 at the .ir;provcT- nts to be constructed are tale foll(ving: the it^,rovomcnt of tic streets idt:i i the district by the installation of cur,, gutter, sidetralks, asphalt street pavement and street liLi;tiIly, and t:ixt zuclL Li:-:rovomcnts are I ec"ed in order to facilitate the use o"_ Said street, iacieaSc the safct'j for persons Usln.- said street, decrease t.'ie rcq i=d :1ai71teniulco on said :street, and provide Oetter lighting on such street. Section 3. Tile location of the ir..Fprove;,%; tts to be made is as follows: Elizabeth Street from Stover Street to L,^nay Avenue. Section: 4. line City Eaginoor is hereby directed to prepare and ,^.rosent to the Coinicil tie following. Proposed. A. PrelinLiary plans and specifications of tT:�e improvements B. A:1 estll;late of tho total cost of Su&, ix..prov(T."Onts, includ- ill^., Idle cost of t)e S;`^'!C., C:;;q�in;: rLt�;, lc) ai nu -xi 1c1vortisin^, Costs, interest 11U'7i,l-' cO.strllctit^It rued irntil assessments are in.-dC by ordin- mce against tic 1irn,)Cloc-neritud, mrid other :Uicidental costs. C. t% map oi' tno district to be assessed for the cost of t+ie ir;; roves, lt:nt>. =,,Ular MC-tiRg. Of tale City CO Cil lelll ti is 27th day Ou 1a7... /s/ Karl E. Carson Mayor AT -TEST'------ /s/Verna Lewis City Clerk Motion was made by Councilman Fead to adopt the resolution of the Council accepting a recommendation from the Director of Public Works regarding the initiation of a Special Improvement District (East Elizabeth Street). This was seconded by Councilman Peterson. The motion carried. AGENDA ITEM SA BIDS - SEAL COATING AND OVERLAY CHIPS Summary: Sterling Paving Flatiron Paving $ 39,020.00 39,600.00 Mr. Roy Bingman, City Engineer, has evaluated the bids. Though the bid from Sterling Paving is for $39,020.00, Council is being requested to approve a contract with Sterling Paving in the amount of $40,000.00.as this amount is within the approved budget and the additional Seal Coat work is urgently needed. REspectfully submitted, /s/ E. M. Kuppinger Purchasing Agent Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Preble, that the recommendation of the Purchasing be approved. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 5B BIDS - CONCRETE $ SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT FOR LIGHT $ POWER DEPARTMENT 5UM?4ARY : Mr. John St. John, Associate Electrical Engineer, has evaluated the bids. The recommendation is that a contract for 4 sack concrete be awarded to Flatiron Materials Co. in the amount of $1,275.00 and a contract for Sidewalk Replacement be awarded to F $ F Concrete Construc- tion in the amount of $1,066.40. Respectfully submitted, /s/ E. M. Kuppinger Purchasing Agent Motion was made by Councilman Preble, seconded by Fead, that the recommendation of the Purchasing Agent be approved. The motion carried. AGENDA ITEM SC BIDS - 160,000-, 1/0 CABLE Mr. George Slatten, Electrical Engineer, has evaluated the bids. The memorandum received from Mr. Slatten indicates that the apparent low bid entered by Okonite Company does not comply with our bid requirements, pertaining to metal escalation clauses, or with the Cable Specifications. The next lowest bid was entered by Essex International, Inc. and complies with the bid requirements and specifications. Since Okonite Company does not meet the specifications, the recommendation is for an award to Essex International, Inc., in the amount of $60,000. Respectfully submitted, /s/ E. M. Kuppinger Purchasing Agent Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that the recommendation of the Purchasing Agent be approved. The motion carried. AGENDA ITEM SD BIDS - 500 U.G. CABLE TERMINALS, 200 AMP. 15 KV FOR LIGHT & POWER DEPARTMENT Mr. George L.. Slatten, Electrical Engineer, has evaluated the bids. The recommendation is that the award be made to Burndy % Mine F, Smelter Industries in the amount of $8,375.00. Respectfully submitted, /s/ E. M. Kuppinger Purchasing Agent . 11 Cl9 Julv 27. 1972 Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Preble, that the recommendation be approved. The motion carried. AGENDA ITEM SE ENGINEERING CONTRACT FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (Contract initiated in Central Files) Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman Fead, to award the Engineering Contracts to Black and Veatch. The motion carried. 6. Sandra Burnett again requested a joint meeting of her committee and Council to discuss possible changes in our municipal form of government. A tentative date of Monday, August 25, 1972, at 7:30 P.M. was set. 7. COMMUNICATION Dear Mrs. Preble and Gentlemen: The Water Board of the City of Fort Collins observes that within the past year and more, the City has acquired considerable raw water resources; and that studies have been made and will be made concerning various addi- tional acquisitions and capital improvements. The Water Board feels that a period of analysis of the options available to the City in the areas of acquisition and development is necessary in order that we may conceive an over-all plan insuring a full and adequate water supply at the most reasonable cost. I am accordingly instructed by the Board to recom- mend to the Council that, for the time being, and pending further recommendation by the Board, the City desist from its present and heretofore desirable policy of active solicitation of purchase of raw water; and, further, that the City refrain from large scale expenditures for this purpose, save for such specific purchases or acquisitions as the Board may from time to time recommend. Capital improvement commitments should likewise be delayed. Respectfully submitted, Ward/H. Fischer, President FORT COLLINS WATER BOARD Motion was made by Councilman Fead to receive the recommendation from the Water Board and adopt the policy as recommended. This was seconded by Councilman Peterson. The motion carried. COMMUNICATION Gentlemen and Madam: As you know, Ward Fischer and I have previously been authorized by the City to conduct a study relating to the acquisition of water resources by the City and means of using such water resources. Most of the study has now been completed and a considerable amount of work has been done toward implementing the general plan which resulted from the study. We are now almost in a position to prepare and submit our final report as the result of this work, which it is hoped will be a guide to the City in con- nection with the future development of the City's water resources. It is anticipated that this report will include all aspects of the study and will set forth priorities for the development of the City's water resources. Initially, the study did not contemplate that we would have any involvement with the Windy Gap Project, nor did we anticipate that we would be concerned with the possibilities of a reservoir at Poverty Flats on the Rockwell Ranch. As we have begun to compile the data for the final report, it has become apparent to us that it will be very difficult to set forth priorities without at least a cursory examination into these two areas. It is impossible to fix priorities with regard to other potential water pro- jects without some investigation into the potential from the Windy Gap Pro- ject and, therefore, we request that we be authorized to investigate, with regard to this project, in order to determine the possible yield from the same and the estimated cost of the water to be developed. IVe would contem- plate that this investigation would only involve our consulting.with the July 27, 1972 engineers and other who have been involved in the study of this project and obtaining the necessary information from them to make an evaluation of the project. It also appears that priorities with regard to water matters should not be established without at least considering the proposed Poverty Flats Reservoir. The City has acquired a one-half interest in the Rockwell Ranch and has for many years contemplated the construction of a reservoir at_this location on the Little South. We have entered an appearance in other actions relating to appropriation dates on the Poudre River in order to protect the possible priorities which might be obtained by the City in connection with this proposed reservoir. It appears that it is extremely desirable at this time to look into this matter for the purpose of determinng whether there is any substantial chance that this reservoir will ever be constructed and, if not, some investigation should be made to see whether it is possible to transfer the preferred position the City may have for this location to the Joe Wright location or some other possible point. Again, it is not anticipated that this would be an extensive investigation and most of the data that would have to be analyzed should be already available to us. If the City Council authorizes this additional work, we would anticipate that our services would be billed at the same rate for which we are billing other matters in connection with this study. Respectfully submitted, A. . March,Jr. Assistant City Attorney Motion was made by Councilman Fead to authorize both Special Counsels to proceed with the work outlined in the letter. This was seconded by Councilman Lopez. The motion carried. A Mutual Aid Agreement between the City of Fort Collins, represented by the Fort Collins Fire Department and the Colorado National Guard, was presented. (Initiated in Central Files) Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Preble, that this agreement be approved. The motion carried. Councilman Preble suggested the possiblility of Councilmen being available to the public one night a week in Council Chambers. The recommendation was approved by the Council and Councilman Preble will start the process of being available on Wednesday, August 2, 1972, and rotating to other members one night a week. Mayor Carson praised the work being done by the interim City Manager and upon Mayor Carson's recommendation a salar��Segffen. Motion was made by Councilman Lopez to grant the Acting City Manager a salary of $17,500.00 per annum, retroactive to the time he took office. This was referred to the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance on same. This was seconded by Councilman Peterson. The motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that the Council adjourn. Motion carried, and the Council adjourned. ATTEST: ty Clerk