Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES-06/01/1976-Regular1 1 June 1, 1976 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO Council - Manager Form of Government Regular ,fleeting - 5:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins was held on Tuesday, June 1, 1976 at 5:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers in the City of Fort Collins City Hall. Roll call was answered by Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Staff Members Present: Brunton, Smith, Bingman, Krempel, ..Kaplan, Harding, Holmes, Parsons, Rice, and Dowell. Also: City Attorney Arthur E. March, Jr. Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 18, 1976 Aouroved Councilman Bowling made.a motion seconded by Councilman Russell to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of May 18, 1976 as published. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. Ordinance Adopted on Second Reading Relating to Parking Distance from Railroad Tracks Councilman Russell made a motion seconded by Councilman Bloom to adopt Ordinance No. 37, 1976 on second reading. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Russell, and Wilkinson. Nays: Councilmembers Reeves and Suinn. ORDINANCE NO. 37 1976 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING.SECTION 114=561 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT''COLLINS RELATING TO --PARK- ING OF VEHICLES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS: That Section 114-56.I. of.the Code of the City of Fort Collins be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows: 303 "Section 114-56. Stopping Standing or Parking.Restricted. I. Within five (5) feet of the nearest rail of a. railroad." Introduced,considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 18thday of May I A.D. 1976, and to be presented:for final passage on the 1st day of June A.D. 1976. ATTEST: S City c er • Passed and adopted on final reading this 1st day of June A.D. 1976. ATTEST: _ 0i4 V lx.r�tJ City Clerk First Reading: May 18, 1976 (Vote: Yeas: 6, Nays: 1) Second Reading: June 1, 1976 (Vote: Yeas: S, Nays: 2) Dates Published: May 23, 1976 and June 6, 1976. Attest: oelI.., Deputy City Clerk Ordinance Adopted on Second Reading Relating to Loading Zones Councilman Bowling made a motion seconded by Councilman Suinn to adopt Ordinance No. 38, 1976 on second.,reading. Yeas: Councilmembers Bowling, Gray;�Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: Councilman Bloom. 304 ORDINANCE NO. 38 , 1976 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 114-196 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AND REPEALING SECTIONS 95-26, 95-27,-95-28, 95-29 AND 114-68 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY, OF FORT COLLINS RELATING TO LOADING ZONES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS: Section 1. That Section 114-196B(9) of the Code of the City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows: "(9) Establish restrictions, prohibitions and regulations for the parking, standing or stopping of vehicles and establish and designate passenger and freight curb loading zones." Section 2. That Section 114-196B(25) of the Code of the -City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows: "(25) Issue special permits for movement of vehicles having excess size or weight, parades or processions, etc." Section 3. That Sections 95-26, 95-27, 95-28, 95-29 and 114-68 of the Code_of the City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby are, repealed. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 18th day of May , A.D. 1976, and to be presented for final passage on the 1st day of June , A.D. 1976. ATTEST:ffa-yoif ity -C er Passed and adopted on final reading this ist day of June A.D. 1976. ATTEST: yor ' U 4 ity Clerk c 305 First Reading: May 18, 1976 (Vote: .Ayes: 6, Nays: 1) Second Reading: June 1, 1976 (Vote: Ayes: 6, Nays: 1) Dates Published: May 23, 1976 and June 6, 1976. Attest: cee6llov�. Deputy City Clerk Ordinance Adopted on First Reading Relating to the Gross Weight of Vehicles The following is the City Manager's memorandum to the City Council on this item: "The City Council has had several requests concerning the through truck traffic on many city streets. Not only is through truck traffic obnoxious from several standpoints in residential areas, but it adds to the deterioration of many streets not designed for heavy truck traffic. Ordinance No. 39, 1976 provides for a limitation of the gross weight of any vehicle or combination of vehicles having three or more axles with more than 46,000 pounds. The limitation of this ordinance does not apply to federal or state highways or I to vehicles making deliveries of cargo within the city limits of Fort Collins." Traffic Engineer Joe Rice spoke to the Council concerning the development of a Fort Collins truck route that would take the heavy truck traffic off the city streets. Councilman Russell made a motion seconded by Councilwoman Reeves to approve Ordinance No. 39, 1976 on first reading. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. Ordinance Adopted on Second Reading Amending the Traffic Code Councilman Bloom made a motion seconded by Councilman Bowling to adopt Ordinance No. 40, 1976 on second reading. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. ORDINANCE NO. 40 1976 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 114 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, RELATING TO VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC 306 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE.COUNCIL OF -THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS: Section 1. That Section 114-19 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as' follows: "§ 114-19. Basic rule. "A. No person shall drive a vehicle on a street or highway within this municipality at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions existing. "B. Except when a special hazard exists that requires lowering speed and except as otherwise provided pursuant to Part C hereof, the following speed limits are hereby established and no persons shall drive a vehicle in excess of such limits. "(1) -In all.school'zdnes-with signs erected and posted giving notice thereof, the speed limit shall be twenty (20) miles per hour. ' "(2) -In all alleyways the speed limit shall be fifteen (15) miles per hour. "(3) On the campus of Colorado State University the speed limit shall be twenty (20) miles per hour unless signs are posted giving notice otherwise, in which event the posted speed shall control. "(4) On all other streets of the City not specifically posted the applicable speed limit shall be thirty (30) miles per hour. "C. The Traffic Engineer pursuant to § 114-196 may establish speed limits different from those established herein and.upon posting -.such limits, the posted speed shall control and it shall be unlawful for any person to drive or operate a motor vehicle in excess of such posted speed limit." Section 2. That Section 114-20 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended by deleting therefrom wherever such phrase appears the phrase "prima facie sued". or "Erima facie speed limit" and by substituting therefor the phrase 'speed limit". 307 Section 3. That Section 114-21 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended by deleting therefrom wherever such phrase appears the phrase "prima facie speed" or "prima facie speed limit" and by substituting therefor the phrase "speed limit". Section 4. That Section 114-22 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended by deleting therefrom the phrase prima facie limits wherever the same appears in said section and by substituting therefor the word "limits". Section 5. That Section 114-25 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended by deleting therefrom the phrase "prima facie speed limit" wherever the same appears in such section and by substituting therefor the phrase 'speed limit". Section 6. That Section 114-26 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended by deleting therefrom the phrase "prima facie speed limitations" wherever the same appears in said section and by substituting therefor the phrase "speed limitations". Section 7. That Section 114-196 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended by changing Part B(3) thereof to read as follows: "(3) Alter the speed limits as permitted by law." Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 18th day of Ma A.D. 1976, and to be presented foralpassage on t e Is day of June A.D. 1976. ATTESTS Mayo City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading this 1st day of June A.D. 1976. ATTEST: yor City Clerk First Reading: May 18, 1976 (Vote: Ayes: 7, Nays: 0) Second Reading: June 1, 1976 (Vote: Ayes: i, ,Ways: Cl Dates Published: May 23, 1976 and June 6, 1976, Attest: pp 308 Deputy City Clerk 1 1 1 1 Ordinance Adopted on Second Reading Vacating an Alley in Block 1S4 At the May 18, 1976 Council meeting, City Attorney March stated that this Ordinance should not be finally adopted until an agreement with the property owner is obtained. That agreement has been received and the City Manager and the Deputy. City Clerk need to be authorized to sign said agreement. Councilman Bowling made a motion seconded by Councilwoman Reeves to authorize the City Manager and the Deputy City Clerk to execute the agreement. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. Councilwoman Gray made a motion seconded by Councilman Russell to adopt Ordinance No. 41, 1976 on second reading. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. ._ ORDINANCE NO. 41 , 1976 BEING; AN ORDINANCE' v-CTING A PORTION OF AN ALLEY IN BLOCK 154, IN THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO I WHEREAS, the - owners of the property aubtting the same have requested that a portion of an alley in Block 154, more particularly described below, be vacated; and -.WHEREAS, the portion for which such vacation is sought"" is not open to use as an alley nor has -the same been used as an alley in the past but a residence on the adjoining land encroaches on this portion; and WHEREAS, in the opinion of the City Council this portion of this alley is not needed for municipal purposes and the rights of the residents of the City will in no way be prejudiced by the vacation of this portion of the alley. I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT"COLLINS that -"the following described portion of the alley in Block 154 in the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, to -wit: Begin at the NE corner of said Block 154, thence Westerly along the North line of said Block 154 190 feet to the dedicated alley, thence Southerly along the East line of said alley 16 feet to.the true point of beginning, thence continuing Southerly along the East line of said alley 35 feet, thence Westerly 1 foot, thence Northerly and parallel to the East line of the alley 35 feet, thence Easterly 1 foot to the true point of beginning; 309 be, and the same hereby is, vacated, abated and abolished. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 18th day of May , A.D. 1976, and to be presented ford al passage on the 1st ay of .Tune A.D. 1976. ATTEST: yor lty Clerk i Passed and adopted on final reading this 1st day of _June A.D. 1976. i I ATTEST: Mayor f City ClerkI I i First Reading: May 18, 1976 (Vote: Ayes: 7, Nays: 0) Second Reading: June 1, 1976 (Vote: Ayes: 7, Nays: 0) Dates Published: May 23, 1976 and June 6, 1976. Attest: 110 `C/vu� O Deputy City Clerk Ordinance Adopted on First Reading Relating to Carnivals City Attorney March advised the Council that prior to the passage of this ordinance on first reading the blank on page 3, section 73-39(A-3) needed to be filled in. Councilman Russell made a motion seconded by Councilman Bowling to insert the sum of $50.00 in the blank on page 3, section 73- 39(A-3) in Ordinance No. 42, 1976. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. Councilwoman Reeves made a motion seconded by Councilman Bloom to adopt Ordinance No. 42, 1976 as amended on first reading. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. 310 1 Procedural Ordinance Relating to Creation of Local Public Improvement Districts Referred Back to Bond Counsel This ordinance creating a local improvement district will be used to establish parking lots. Councilwoman Reeves made a motion seconded by Councilman Bowling to adopt this ordinance. Following discussion, the motion and the second were withdrawn. Further discussion led to a consensus of the Council that this issue should be placed on a ballot for a vote by the qualified electors within the proposed district. Councilman Bowling made a motion seconded by Councilman Bloom to refer the ordinance back to bond counsel to consider initiating - the district by election. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Boling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn, and Wilkinson. Nays: None. Resolution Adopted Authorizing the City Manager to Request the NCWCD to iMake a Study of the Feasibility of Enlarging the Existing Outlet in Soldier Canyon Dam of Horsetooth Reservoir The following is the City Manager's memorandum to the Council on this subject: "At the present time the City of Fort Collins receives its Horsetooth water through a tunnel at Soldier Canyon. We have been discussing for some time the possibility of expanding our treatment facilities at this location or working towards an 2. additional outlet further.south.through,a.new tunnel and additional treatment facilities. The City of Fort Collins was partially instrumental in creating the Horsetooth Water Service Commission. The Bureau of Reclama- tion and M & I Engineering were retained to make some preliminary studies. Roger Krempel, our Water $ Sewer Utilities Director, has been our representative on this Commission. Enclosed is a memorandum from Mr. Krempel on this subject. As indicated, the cost for the tunnel, treatment and additional transmission facilities. is extremely expensive. The delivery price of water at SS¢ per thousand gallons is also high. It is now necessary for the Commission to make some basic decisions concerning proceeding with this project. Their next meeting will be on Monday, June 14th. Prior to that time we would like to meet with the Water Board and City Council to discuss our ' recommendations and to firm up a decision on this project. We will meet with the Water Board on Friday afternoon, May 28, 1976. If they have additional recommendations or thoughts on this matter, these will be presented at the City Council meeting. 311 Recommendation: Providing the Water Board does not provide any conflicting or additional comments or recommendations, the ' Administration recommends that the City Council take the follow- ing course of action. 1. Advise the Horsetooth l'iater Service Commission that the City would not participate in a new outlet from the Horsetooth Reservoir at Spring Canyon or a regional water treatment plant, but would like to continue to participate with the Commission in the study of regional water resource concerns. 2. Recommend to the City Council that the City proceed to expedite a project to increase the outlet capacity at Soldier Canyon and by resolution, authorize the City Manager to request.such a project from the Northern Colorado Conservancy District. An expenditure up to $6,000 will be required for the Bureau of Reclamation to review the feasi- bility of such a project and prepare necessary documenta- tion for inclusion in the 1978 budget. 3. Work together with all entities interested in participating in a project to increase the capacity of the Soldier Canyon Outlet." Roger Krempel, Water and Sewer Utilities Director, reviewed the activities of the Horsetooth Water Service Commission to date. ' Councilman Bowling made a motion to adopt the resolution autho- rizing the City Manager to request the NCWCD to make a study of the feasibility of enlarging the existing outlet in Soldier Canyon Dam at Horsetooth Reservoir. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. RESOLUTION 76-31 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO REQUEST THAT THE NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT MAKE A STUDY OF THE FEASIBILITY OF ENLARGING THE EXISTING OUTLET IN THE SOLDIER CANYON DAM OF HORSETOOTH RESERVOIR WHEREAS, the City of Fort Collins has participated in studies relating to possible projects which would make additional water available through Horsetooth Reservoir for municipal use; and 312 WHEREAS, the City Administration has reviewed such study and has concluded that it is in the best interests of the City to attempt to enlarge the present outlet from Horsetooth Reservoir in the Soldier Canyon Dam; and WHEREAS, in order to proceed with.such_project it will be"necessary-_to-negotlate with the Northern Colorado --Water Conservancy District to increase such outlet capacity; and WHEREAS, the project to increase the capacity of the existing outlet will require a review of the feasibility of such project by the Bureau of Reclamation at the expense of the City; and WHEREAS, the expense of such review will be up to $6,000.00; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to proceed with this project ..and to authorize payment of the cost of the feasibility review of the project by' -the Bureau of Reclamation. NOW, THEREFORE,•BE.IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS: Section 1. That the City Manager be, and he hereby is, authorized and directed to request that.the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District take such steps as may be necessary to increase the existing outlet capacity at the Soldier Canyon-Dam.of.Horsetooth Reservoir; and the City Manager is,:: further authorized and directed to -execute such agreements for and on behalf of the City as may be necessary to accom- plish this result. Section 2. That the City Manager be, and he hereby is, authorized and directed to contract with the United States of America Bureau of Reclamation for a review of the feas- ibility of such a project at._an expense to the City not to exceed $6,000.00. Passed'and adopted at a Council .held this, -1st day of ATTEST: / pfy City Clerk regular meeting of the City June 'A . 1976. Mayor 313 Resolution Adopted .Authorizing the City Manager to Apply for a Grant in Connection ' with the Renovations Being Made to STP N1 Following is the City Manager's memorandum to the Council. "The City has made four change orders and three contract modifi- cations with regard to the State grant for sewage work in connec- tion with the improvements and enlargement of haste Water Treatment Plant No. 1. The last change order was to comply with the Colorado Department of Labor directive to pay prevail- ing wages from December, 1975, to the completion of the project. The State agreed to pay part of this cost which initially was $13,750 and is now estimated at $24,345. all amended grant contracts have been signed by the City Manager. Apparently the Colorado Department of Health is now requesting further documentation of the statutory authority of the City Manager to sign contracts on behalf of the City. The enclosed resolution authorizes the City Manager to apply for and sign contracts on this amendment and grant ad-dition and for any other additional grant money that may be available." Councilman Bloom made a motion seconded by Councilwoman Gray to adopt the resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for a grant in connection with renovations being made at ' Sewer Treatment Plant No. 1. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. RESOLUTION 76-32 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPLY FOR A GRANT AND TO EXECUTE A GRANT AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH RENOVATIONS BEING MADE TO WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1 OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS WHEREAS, the City of Fort Collins heretofore applied for and received a grant from the State of Colorado to assist the City in constructing improvements and renovations to Waste Water Treatment Plant No. 1 of the City of Fort Collins; and WHEREAS, the cost of such construction was subsequently increased because of a determination to comply with the prevailing wage law of the State of Colorado in connection ' with such construction work; and 314 WHEREAS, it appears an additional grant may be available to the City from the State of Colorado because of such additional cost. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that the City Manager be, and he hereby is, authorized and directed to apply for such additional grant as may be available from the State of.Colorado.,.:..Depart- ment-of.Health, to.assist in meeting additional costs of constructing improvements to Waste Water Treatment Plant No. 1 because of compliance with Colorado Prevailing Wage Law, and the City Manager is further authorized and directed to execute such contract agreements and amendments as may be required in connection_ with..obtaining such grant. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held this 1st day of June, A.D. 1976. ATTEST: City Clerk pot wffif�_jl �A • Resolution adopted Approving an Extension to an Agreement with the Union Pacific Railroad Councilwoman Gray made a motion seconded by -Councilman Bowling to adopt the resolution approving an agreement with the Union Pacific Railroad covering the right of way for an overhead power line along North College Avenue. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. RESOLUTION 76-33 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS APPROVING AN EXTENSION .TO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY WHEREAS; Union Pacific Railroad Company has tendered to the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, an agreement extending to and including June 13, 1986, the term of contract dated ' August 3, 1961, covering overhead power wire lines on, along and across the right of way and over the tracks, Fort Collins, Colorado; said agreement being identified as Union Pacific Railroad Company's C.D. No. 39850-3-D; and I 31S WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fort Collins has said proposed agreement before it and has given it careful review and consideration; and WHEREAS, it said City of Fort the acceptance of is considered that Collins, Colorado, said agreement. NOW,.THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED CITY OF FORT COLLINS that the terms by Union Pacific Railroad Company as same are hereby, accepted in behalf the best interests of will be subserved by BY THE COUNCIL OF THE of the agreement submitted aforesaid be, and the of said City; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor of said City is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of said City, and that the City Clerk of said City is hereby authorized and directed to attest said agreement and to attach to each duplicate original of said agreement a certified copy of this resolution. Passed and adopted at a Council held this 1st day of ATT�ES/T� /ll� v/ v V /-x.wt/ Ajlw City Clerk regular meeting of the City June, A.D. 1976. yo Easement Granted to the Platte River Power Authority The PRPA needs an easement across City property just north of our Waste Water Treatment Plant No. 2. This is a part of the property we are purchasing under option from Riverbend Farms. We agreed on a consideration of $923.55 from the PRPA for this easement. Councilman Bowling made a motion seconded by Councilman Suinn to grant the easement to Platte River Power Authority and authorize the City Manager and Deputy City Clerk to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. Various Deeds and Easements Accepted 1. Two Dedication Deeds from Woodward Governor for a right-of- way and easement for part of Lemay Avenue. Consideration: None 1 16 2. Easement from Woodward Governor Company for the installation, reinstallation and maintenance of underground utilities and utility lines along Lemay Avenue at two locations. Consideration: None 3. Dedication Deed from Reliable Linen F, Industrial Uniform Service for a right-of-way and easement for part of River- side Drive. Consideration: $11,700 Councilwoman Gray made a motion seconded by Councilman Bowling to approve the dedication deeds and the easement from Woodward Governor Company. Yeas: Councilmembers Bowling Gray, Reeves, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. (Councilmembers Bloom and Russell out of room) Councilwoman Reeves made a motion seconded by Councilman Bowling to accept the negotiations with Reliable -Linen $ Industrial Uniform. Service and proceed. Yeas: Councilmembers Bowling, Gray, Reeves,.Suinn-and Wilkinson. Nays: None. (Councilmembers ,Bloom and Russell out.. of r.00m) Adjourned Council Fleeting Date Set for June 22, 1976 Mr. Brunton's memorandum on this matter is as follows: "In the month of June the majority of the City Council members will be out of the city attending the annual meeting of the American Public Power Association. Previously, this matter was informally discussed with the City Council. ....The general consensus was that it would be best to have an official meeting of the Council on June 22nd, since June 'Sth is too soon after the June 1st meeting, and June 29th would be too long a period between official meetings. The City Attorney indicated that we could make the necessary changes by motion. Recommendation: The Administration recommends that the City Council pass a motion recognizing the fact that a quorum will not be present at the regular meeting on June 1S, 1976, and therefore, adjourning this meeting to June 22, 1976. As;was suggested, a member of our staff will post a notice on the door of the Council Chambers to indicate the cancellation of the June 15th meeting." Councilman Bowling made a motion seconded by Councilwoman Gray to adjourn the regular Council meeting on June 15th to June 22nd. Yeas: Councilmembers Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Suinn and ' Wilkinson. Nays: None. (Councilmembers Bloom and Russell out of room) 317 Citizen Participation Robert Phi-llips submitted a petition requesting a bicycle lane in the area of Lincoln Street east to Ninth Avenue through the Andersonville area. Said petition contains 986 signatures, 239 of the signatures being children who ride in this area regularly, the rest of the signatures being those of adults. The petitions were also presented to the. County Commissioners as a part of this area is in the County. Mayor Wilkinson accepted the petitions and referred the matter to staff for a report to be back in 30 days. Proclamations A Proclamation proclaiming National Tennis Week (June 19 through June 27, 1976) was presented and read at length. Report from the City Manager The following listed items were brought to the attention of the Council by Mr. Brunton. .(A part of the City Manager's report was given prior to the break; the remainder of the report was given after the break). 1. Received S9 applications for the position of Assistant ' City Attorney. 2. Received 111 applications for the position of Controller. 3. Will be interviewing two more people for the position of Cultural Resources Director. 4. Received a grant from HUD in the amount of $30,000 for the indoor swimming pool. 5. The Colorado Civil Rights Commission has reopened the Betty Jarzyna case. 6. Revenue sharing payments will be made directly to the account at Rocky Mountain Bank. 7. Will be putting out a general revenue sharing planning use report. 8. Ralph Smith served on the Oral Board for the Deputy Director of the CBI. 9. Application made for Bureau of' Outdoor Recreation funds in 1975 for a park somewhere in the square mile bordered by Mulberry, Prospect, Taft Hill and Overland Trail. ' This request was turned down; hope to have Conservation Trust Fund monies left over to use in developing a park somewhere in this area. 318 10. Indoor pool completely painted; it is white instead of blue. 11. Outdoor pool was painted.by staff, new heating system is in, two pumps went out but will be repaired in time to open the pool on June 9. 12. Bikeway grant submitted May 28th requesting $84,268. Only ones from our area requesting grant. 13. State Highway Commission voted on May 20th to continue the Urban Systems Program as is. 14. Procedure to go into regarding gifts and the use of volunteers. 15. Charts of month by month of sales tax over last three years and a cumulative total chart. 16. Pre -budget work sessions on June 29th and July_13th, 1:00 to 500 and 7:00 to 10:00 P.M. each day. 17. Request to use the 1927 American-LaFrance Fire Truck in one of the City's parks. 18. Letter to all of the people fronting on College Avenue between Laurel and Magnolia that the parking on College will not be allowed after January.l, 1977. 19. CATV additional meetings scheduled and an amendment to the current franchise has been requested. 20.Tennis program at Edora Park not doing very good, wind or wet conditions, 22 out of the first 30 days. 21. Official word from UMPTA regarding the grant for $32,076; the City has 60 days in which to respond. 22. Resignation of Duane Woodard -from the Planning and Zoning Board. 23. Complaints about lights at Edora for baseball games. 24. Increase in cost of major medical insurance and 5 % increase in Workman's Compensation Insurance. 25. Soldier Canyon Water Treatment Plant is back in partial operation. 26. Received three letters in support of Transfort. ' 27. Received letter concerning the dog ordinance and the rabies vaccination, and limiting the size and number of dogs owned plus several other areas of dog control. 28. Purposely have held off on the historic landmarks procedures until June 22 when someone will be available to discuss this with Council. 319 29. Plan to have an ordinance on the fire and burglar alarm systems ready for hearing and first reading on ' June 22. 30. Report on museum heating system on June 22 and what the trade-offs are. 31. Report on the administrative costs of the recreation activities received in City Manager's office today. 32. Brief report on Open Space Program. A. Official, unofficial _subject to Council approval, the Maxwell property under firm option. B. Letter to Pine Ridge but no reply from Pine Ridge to date. C. Owners of Venture property do not want to talk to us. D. Waiting on the Attorney to say yes or no on Buckingham Park. (Attorney says yes but he needs confirmation from the owners.) E. Have offers from two properties across from the ' Lincoln Park site to the southwest. F. Negotiating with the University for 20 to 25 acres for the Soldier Canyon expansion and more will be done for a fire station site on Elizabeth Street at the bull farm area. Report from City Council Representatives on Committees Councilman Bowling reported that a Council of Government meeting on Wednesday, June 2, 1976, is to begin at 6:30 p.m. and that the Platte River Power Authority will be presenting a report. Councilwoman Reeves reported on the Human Resources Board meeting of Thursday, May 27, 1976. The social service agencies that want to apply for revenue sharing funds can do so by filing a notice of intent by June 15th and then have their application in by August-lst so the Board can have budget hearings in August and then make recommendations. The Board is also asking for a report of past projects and proposed projects to help in the consideration of the requests. ' Councilman Russell's report stated the Municipal League group has selected someone to study the train situation up 320 and down the foothills and the study is in .progress. Fred Allen of the Municipal League was to contact Les Kaplan regarding a conference for the study of criteria for P. U. D.'s, subdivisions and site plans. Ordinance Adopted as Amended on First Reading Relating to Sidewalk Improvement District No. 6 Director of Engineering Services Roy A. Bin. -man described briefly the areas covered by the proposed district. City Engineer Don Parsons spoke to each area in detail, giving the specific estimated costs and size of the walks to be installed. City Attorney March advised the Council that there was a letter on file that could be considered as a remonstrance if the Council so desired. Councilman Suinn made a motion seconded by Councilman Bowling to accept the letter from the property owners on Eastdale Drive as a valid remonstrance to the proposed improvements on the south side of Laurel Street between"'Stover Street and Endicott Street. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and.Wilkinson. Nays: None. Councilman Bloom made a motion seconded by Councilman Suinn that Ordinance No. 44, 1976 be amended by deleting from Exhibit A, Section A-3 as :follows: "3. The south side of Laurel Street.from-'Stover Street east to Endicott Street:" - and then to pass the ordinance'on first reading. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. Zoning Board of Appeals Decision Reversed on Claude Parker Property (Appeal No. 628) City Attorney Art March, Jr., -reviewed the appeal made by Mr. Claude Parker to the.Zoning Board of Appeals and the action finally taken.by`the Board. The following is the City Manager's memorandum to the City Council on this matter. "Mr. Vic DeCicco, 1924 West Lake, appeared before the May 18, 1976, City Council meeting requesting the Council to ' consider reviewing the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals in connection with Appeal No. 628. At its May 11, 1976-- meeting the Zoning Board of Appeals approved the reduced side -yard requirement from seven feet to four feet and reduced the rear -yard requirement from fifteen feet to twelve feet to allow for a full-size garage. The property is located 321 at 1928 West Lake. This matter was previously tabled at the March 9 and April 13 meetings of the Zoning Board of Appeals. ' The City Council requested that a review hearing be held on this matter at the June 1, 1976 meeting. Recommendation: The Administration recommends that the City Council lave a hearing on this matter in accordance with the procedures established by the City Attorney. At the hearing the City Council should decide whether or not to uphold the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals." The following is an excerpt from the minutes of the Zoning Board of appeals relating to Appeal No. 628, from the meeting of May lli 1976: "Boardmember Lowell made a motion, seconded by Boardmember Wonch to grant the side yard variance as requested and allow a variance in the rear yard of up to 6' of the utility easement. The Chairman put the motion which was unanimously adopted." Mr. Vic DeCicco, 1924 West Lake Street, spoke in opposition to this decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals, stating that he was opposed to the proposed garage being placed closer to his adjoining property line. Mr. Robert Kainer, 1917 West Lake Street, presented the ' following petition to Council in opposition to the granting of this variance: We, the. undersigned property owners in the 1900 block of Palest Lake. Street, Fort Collins, wish the. City Council to know of our objections to the proposed garage to be built in the rear of 1928 W. Lake St. by rdr. Claude Parker. We object; to the excessive noise he makes with his motorcycles which he proposes to house in said garage. We also do not want to encourage random building in this area that could cause a decrease ' in property values. 322 1 1 NATIVE c ADDRESS P/HOlI'; /�/.•Y �in,;.l /�L.S ': .l i�.;'�-a) Q /•%.:7-, i91a /./.v,% 1 MIA i a C • Mr. Claude L. Parker, the appellant, reviewed the request, stating how the new building would be used. Mrs. Mary Jane Hall spoke to the Council stating that her objection to the appeal is that there is a lot of noise and the value of her property would decrease if the garage is placed closer to the property line. Councilman Bowling made a motion seconded by ,Councilwoman Gray that the Zoning Board of Appeals decision be overturned and the variance be denied. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. Zoning Board of Appeals Decision on Brack Property at 141S South College Upheld (Appeal No. 632) and Property at 121 West Lake Denied :(Appeal.,No_. 633) . City Attorney March reviewed these appeals with the Council. Excerpts from the minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of April 13, 1976 relating to Appeals No. 632 and 633 are as follows: "Boardmember Stevison made a motion, seconded by Board - member Osborn to grant the variance for one of the specific uses outlined in Mr. Brack's letter of -March 19, 1976 with the condition that they are not granting any variances on parking at 1415 South College Avenue. (Secretary's Note: Mr. Brack's letter in Central Files) 323 The Chairman stated that the request that they must rule on is the size variance requirement. He stated I that they can include in the motion a specific use which can be used. The Chairman put the motion with the following vote: Yeas: Boardmembers Hauser, Osborn and Stevison. Nays: Boardmember Wonch. Boardmember Stevison clarified the motion stating that they are granting the size variance with the specific requirement that the occupancy must be one of those stated in paragraph 8 of the letter to t e Zoning Board of Appeals above. (Note: Letter in Central Files) The Chairman reouested that action be taken on appeal number 633. also. Boardmember Wonch made a motion, seconded by Boardmember Stevison, that the variance be granted specifically for parking. The Chairman put the motion which was unanimously adopted." Mr. John Clarke, 1405 South College, representing the property owners in the area, spoke in opposition to this request, particularly the request at 121 West Lake for a parking lot. Mr. Cecil Stayer, 133 West Lake, spoke in opposition to the proposed parking lot for 121 West Lake. ' The following two letters are included into.the record. The first letter is from the protestants to the appeal, the. second letter is the reply from Mr. and Mrs. Henry Brack, the applicants for the variance. May 19, 1976 . City Council City of Fort Collins 300 La Porte Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 Ladies and Gentlemen of the Council; We are writing to protest, in most strenuous terms, the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals pertaining to the Variance requested by Henry and Dorothy Brack that was granted on April 13, 1976, concerning the use of 121 West Lake Street as a parking lot. The following items I relate to our disagreement with this action and indicate our reasons for presenting these arguments. 324 1. We hereby want to go on record as objecting to the approval of 121 West Lake Street for the purpose of parking. We do not object to the use of 1415 South College Avenue as outlined in paragraph 8 of the Brack's letter dated March 9, 1976, however, we do object to the use of said property as a beauty salon, which is a transaction now in the process of being negotiated. Further, we feel.that any use of 1415 South College Avenue should be based on the physical ability of that property to accomodate a particular business or other enterprise and not tied,to the'use of,a,completely''unrelated.prbperty (121 West Lake) to make that property saleable and usable. 2. We feel that this variance does not support the PUD Zoning Concept that has been designated for this area, because of the separation of activity associated with such a parking lot situated within and surrounded by.residences. The traffic that would be generated on Lake Street by automobiles using this lot would aggravate an already intolerable amount of congestion on Lake Street, caused by traffic to and from the Colorado State University Campus. 3. We -would like to point out to the .Council that 121 West Lake Street is too far away from 1415 South College"Avenue to be useful and convenient for .employees, customers and visitors as a parking area. Any convenient route between the two properties would involve unlawful trespass of the interconnecting property. s ' 4. We want to go on record as stating that we feel the Planned Business Zone is proper for this area, and commercial development should fall within the guidelines of such zoning. It will provide for proper and orderly development of these properties and not the helter-skelter commercializing that this variance will allow. 5. We would like to point out to the.Council'that'the Bracks do not plan to remain in the area if they can sell their property for a good price. We are permanent residents and property owners in the neighborhood and do not plan to sell within the near future. The Bracks have requested this variance for the sole purpose of making their property easier to sell and at a higher price, and all at the expense of the surrounding neighborhood. These vested financial interests do not make an argument for proper planning or represent the best interests of the community at large. We feel that the Council should put the interests of the City above the -interests of profit-oriented.individuals. 6. Again, we in no way intend this protest to restrict the ability of Henry and Dorothy Brack to sell 1415 South College Avenue as per the terms of the Conditional Variance that was granted them on April 13, 1976. However, we would not support any uses for that property other than those outlined in paragraph 8 of the Bracks March 9, 1976 letter. We are, as previously mentioned, vigorously protesting the ' parking lot concept for la West Lake. We would also object,-.-_ however, to any usage that is "more intense" than that which currently exists at 1415 S. College Avenue. 325 Sincerely submitted, 1 Q"wnAoo 133 ul..� / f 1415 S. College Ft. Collins, CO' 80521 May 28, 1976 City Council City of Fort Collins, Colorado 300 La Porte Avenue Fort Collins, Colo. 80521 Ladies and Gentlemen: In re: Granted VARIANCE On APPEAL #632; 1415 S. College Ave. and APPEAL #633 121 W. Lake This letter is in response to a protest lodged with the City of Fort Collins, Colorado above subject. The petitioners for the granted variance cannot understand the protest for the following reasons: 326 1. The petitioners initial request at City public hearing was made in March 1976. There were no protests at said meeting, per- haps because the entire matter was tabled due to vagueness of the variance --request. It is my recollection that at above meeting, the,City Attorney suggested that -we,present. at the next regularly scheduled meeting a specific request for each of the sites 1415 S. College Avenue and 121 W. Lake. 2.On-April 13, 1976 the above Appeals were again heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Both' of"the,,herein variances were granted. I stress that at this meeting none of signers -,of letter of protest attached either made; -a verbal protest no did.they write a protest .-.letter. All-of„the .adjacent owners including the protestors were notified in ample time to either appear in person or write their objections. The only person who spoke as a citizen at the April 13, 1976 meeting was Harold Miller, owner of Poudre Valley Construction. ' Poudre Valley Construction is the developer of the 1300 Block S. College Avenue which is adjacent to the property subject of this letter. Mr Miller's comments to Zoning Board of Appeals were all in favor of variances as requested #632•and #633. I now direct this letter to the specific objections as cited by John Clarke, Joe Vausant and others, such letter dated May 19, 1976. 1. The variances as granted are not tied one to the other. 1415 S. College is for use as a "Hair Styling Salon." The total physical ability of the property is quite ample to support the proposed business without causing any hardship real or imagined against the area or adjacent owners. 2. The variance 1133 is not tied to 1632., however under the pre- sent code said parking variance is quite legal and represents a sincere effort on the part of the (racks to provide off-street parking in an area where owners are not providing ample parking for the parking problems they are partially creating. 327 3. I respectfully point out that the parking variance as granted ' is well within the guidelines of the City Code and any assumption that unlawful trespass from 121 W. Lake to any other area in the vicinity is speculation. The only remote possibility of trespass is on a property at 117 W. Lake. The owners of 117 W. Lake were contacted by the protestors and said owners declined to sign the protest. 117 W. Lake is adjacent to the granted variance #633 11121 W. Lake." 4. We have owned and lived at 141S S. College Avenue for 22 years. The changes in the environment at 1415 S. College have indeed been significant. The BP Zoning in the 1400 Block of S. College has been in effect since October 1965. The present BP Zoning in the 1400 Block S. College Avenue has been regressive in nature probably because of the large number of land owners in a very small area. As a matter of fact, it is, impossible to meet BP Zoning between W. Lake and W. Prospect with College Avenue on the east and the alley on the , west. This is not because the land owners are unwilling to .sell, there is just not adequate land even though the lots are 180 feet deep. S. The protest letter you have been presented with is in gross error regarding the future plans of the Bracks. We are presently and have been for some time negotiating for other property in the immediate area with intent of constructing a building. Two of the signers in your protest letter were informed of our plans prior to their complaint to you. We regret this mis-information to you has made this particular specific reply necessary. 6. The protest letter you have in your hands is signed by 6 indi- viduals, 3 of which are residents and 3 of which are property owners. To my knowledge 3 of the owners have never lived in the block. ' 328 As a matter of record there are 17 separate dwelling units in the 1400 block S. College Ave. Of the 17 units in the entire block, only:-- 3 resident owners are protesting and 3 non-resident owners are protesting. This type of ownership, coupled with.the present existing Zoning has over the past 11 years manifested itself in general obsolesence in the area. Assuming the variances are granted on a specific basis, a most beneficial and,.meaningful.occurence will have taken place. 1. A tax base change will in all probability occur. 2. The individual properties will no doubt receive a. face-lifting in paint, general landscaping and -other general repair. ` It is our sincere belief that if in its present deliberation, the City Council does in fact concurr with its Zoning Board of Appeals that a general up -grading in the 1400 Block South College will occur. Re ctfully s ted Henry B. $ Dorothy M. Brack HB/lr Mr. Don Mourning, Attorney::representing Mr. Brack, spoke in support of the request. Mr. John Clarke spoke in rebuttal to Mr. Brack's letter stating that the letter was in error in at least one place; in paragraph 1, Mr. Clarke did submit a letter of protest and the area neighbors were present at the meeting. In paragraph 2, at the April meeting Mr. Clarke felt his protest would be brought forward from the March meeting to the April meeting since it was a'tabled meeting. 329 Mr. Henry Brack next retracted his statement that there had been no protests filed in regard to these appeals. He t also clarified the proposed types of uses and the need for a zoning change and the granting of the requested variances. Director of Planning Les Kaplan spoke to the zoning of the area and the requirements currently in force covering P. U. D.'s. Councilwoman Reeves made a motion seconded by Councilwoman Gray that the variance for the uses as stated at 1415 South• College be upheld and that the variance for 121 West Lake be denied. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, and Suinn. Nays: Councilman Wilkinson. Vance First Annexation Referred Back to City Attorney for Annexation Ordinance Preparation; Zoning Question Referred to Staff for Further Studv Les Kaplan, Director of Planning, spoke to the Vance Annexa- tion and the staff recommendation for the general zoning plan. (Complete report in Central Files) Bill Wyatt, attorney representing the petitioners, addressed the Council regarding the desires of the petitioners. The first request was for zoning to allow the establishment of a veterinarian hospital near the northwest corner of the annexation. Dr. Tom Johnston, veterinarian, spoke to the Council regarding the vet hospital and the proposed plans. He petitioned the area and stated that the problem he encountered was that the objection was to the C-commercial zoning needed for this hospital. Garth Rogers, attorney representing the Parkwood Homeowners' Association, voiced their opposition to commercial and high density areas. Petitions were presented in opposition to the proposed development. Mr. Wyatt next spoke to the kind of development his client would like to pursue at this particular location. (A detailed description is in the Planning and Zoning Board minutes from the May 10, 1976 meeting.) Kenneth Wolfe, attorney representing the Lake Sherwood Homeowners' Association, presented petitions opposing the high rise type structures and th& commercial zoning for the v.et hospital. , Mr. Pete Peterson, 1301 Rollingwood Lane, President of the Parkwood Homeowners' Association, stated that the main 330 1 I objection of the Parkwood residents to the proposed develop- ment is the density. Another objection is that there is no apparent need for additional commercial zoning since there is a planned business zoning- .section on the west side of Lemay, just across the street from the proposed development. He also stated that there were several residents who wished to retract their names from Dr. Johnston's petition in order to have -their names on the opposing petition. Ms. Elaine Hartman, 1713 Yucca Court, Vice -President of the Lake Sherwood Homeowners' Association, spoke in opposition to the development, specifically stating that the only access to the Lake Sherwood Subdivision is Drake Road and that high density development will add to the automobile congestion atDrakeand Lemay. - Councilman Bloom proposed to Council that they proceed with the annexation and turn the zoning --question back to the Planning and Zoning Board and .eliminate the commercial zoning completely from any further coning plans for this area. The following charge was issued to the Planning and Zoning Board: "The prescribing of a composite of complementary zones which . >are compatible with the surrounding area and which fulfill the general land use needs within the City." Councilman Bloom made a motion seconded by Councilman Bowling to refer the matter of annexation to the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance to.annex.the area as an area that has .been totally surrounded for a period of three years and.refer the question of zoning to Planning and.Zoning. The motion was later withdrawn. Councilman Bloom made a motion seconded by Councilwoman Reeves to authorize the City Attorney to draw up the annexation ordinance for consideration. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. Councilman Bowling made a motion seconded by Councilman Suinn to refer the zoning question back to staff to meet with all interested parties and report back. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling,..Gray, Reeves,,Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: :None: (The consensus of the Council was that a report would be made to the Council within 90 days.) Cottonwood P.U.D. Preliminary Plan Referred Back to the Administration Director of Planning Les Kaplan spoke to the proposed plan. The Cottonwood P.U.D. is areplat of the former College Greens 331 Subdivision, and is located on the northeast corner of Stover Street and East Drake Road. There would be a total of 312 units on the 52.2-acre site with single-family lots on the north two-thirds of the property and apartment buildings and commercial uses on the south one-third. Maurice Deines, developer, spoke to the Council as to how he proposes to build this development and the arrangement of buildings. The commercial area will not be constructed until the rest of the development is complete. The proposed day care center will be built in the early stages of the development. Mr. Gene Mitchell, attorney representing HCI, another developer of properties at Lemay and Drake, spoke in opposi- tion to the proposed plan for Cottonwood P.U.D., especially the commercial zoning. Mr. Ron Fulkrod, Grounds Manager for Woodward Governor Company, addressed the Council stating their opposition to the two story buildings to be built in Phase I of the plan. He also spoke to the location of an entrance into the development on the east side being quite close to the west driveway of Woodward Governor. General consensus of Council was that this is a good plan I but there is some hesitancy about the placement of the commercial zoning. Councilman Bowling made a motion seconded by Councilman Bloom to approve the preliminary plat without the commercial zoning but to include the day care center: Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, and Russell. Nays: Council - members Gray, Reeves, Suinn and Wilkinson. Motion defeated. Councilman Suinn made a motion seconded by Councilman Bowling to refer the P.U.D. proposal back to staff for further negotiations given the input of the Council and the audience in this matter. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: Councilmember Russell. Action of Curfew Ordinance Request Tabled to June 22, 1976 Council Meeting Mr. Brunton's memorandum to the Council on this matter is as follows: "At the May 18, 1976, meeting, the City Council received a recommendation regarding amendments to our curfew ordinance. 332 1 Rosita Bachmann, our Human Rights Officer, Lupe Carbajal, Director of Equal Opportunity at Colorado State University and Chairperson of the Task Force on Police -Community Relations, and Attorney Paul Salas, presented the background of the activities of the Task Force and the request for changes in the curfew ordinance. The Council requested that this matter be placed on the agenda for the June lst meeting for further discussion. Enclosed is the letter from Lupe Carbajal requesting the amendments to the curfew ordinance. The Task Force requests that the age limit be reduced from 16 to 14 years, and that the hours of prohibition be from 1 a.m. to S a.m. in place of the present 11 p.m. to S a.m." Chief Smith spoke to the reasons for the curfew and its objectives. Lupe Carbajal, Chairman of the Task Force on Police -Community Relations, spoke to the reasons for requesting a change in the curfew ordinance. (iVritten report in Central Files) After lengthy discussion, Councilman Suinn made a motion seconded by Councilman Bloom to table any action on this until the next Council meeting, in oYder to obtain input from the PTO and PAB organizations. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: Councilmembers Gray and Reeves. Mr. Bruce Hall, Assistant Professor of Social Work at Colorado State University, spoke in support of the curfew in concept. Mr. Gil Carbajal, with Poudre R-1 Schools, spoke to the concern to improve Police -Community relations and the improvement of attitude toward youth. Mr. Sam Van Why, Chairman of the Police -Community Relations subcommittee of the Human Relations Commission, submitted a report to the Council concerning a survey they made. (A copy of the report is in Central Files.) Adiournment Councilman Russell made a motion seconded by Councilman Bloom to adjourn the meeting. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Gray, Reeves, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. Mayor ATTEST: Deputy City Cler 333