Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES-11/24/1971-RegularV L� Novemb er_24.,_19.7.1 MINUTES OF MEETING November 24, 1971 The City Council of the City of Fort Collins met in regular session at 1:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building on Thursday, November 24, 1971. Present Councilmen Carson, Lopez, Councilwoman Preble, Councilmen Peterson and Fead. Also present: Tom Coffey, City Manager Arthur E. March, City Attorney Charles Liquin, Director of Public Works DISPENSING OF MINUTES Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that the reading of the. minutes of the regular meeting held November 18, 1971, be dispensed with. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. The Mayor declared the Council now acting as Liquor Licensing authority. APPLICATION OF SAGEBRUSH, INC. FOR HOTEL -RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE, 934 LEMAY (Renewal) Report of Ralph M. Smith, Chief of Police, regarding this license in which he indicated there had been no problem with this establishment. This report filed in the Central Files. Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that this renewal be approved. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. Upon reconvening as a Council, the following renewal of a Fermented Malt Beverage was presented. C. J. STREIT DBA PIZZA ROMA, 746 North College Avenue. A report presented by Ralph M. Smith, Chief of Police, on this renewal, in which he indicated there has been no problem with this establishment, was presented. This report is filed in the Central Files. Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that this renewal be approved. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 2A ORDINANCE NO. 60, 1971 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY Motion was made by Councilwoman Preble, seconded by Councilman Fead, that Ordinance No. 60, 1971, be adopted. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 2B ORDINANCE NO. 61, 1971 BEING AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF AN ALLEY IN BLOCK 315, CAPITOL HILL ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman Fead, that Ordinance No. 61, 1971, be adopted. Upon a roll tall, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 4A ORDINANCE NO. 65, 1971 (First Reading) BEING AN ORDINANCE ASSESSING THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS IN SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. S5 AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT AND COLLECTION THEREOF Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that Ordinance No. 6S, 1971, be considered favorably on first reading this 24th day of November, 1971, and to be presented for final passage on the 16th day of December, 1971. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that the Council adjourn. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative and the Council adjourned. Mayor ATTEST: t City Clerk { December 2 and 9. 1971 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD December 2, 1971, at 1:30 P.M. o'clock, in the Council room. Present: John Bartel, City Clerk Absent: Councilmen Carson, Lopez, Councilwoman Preble, Councilmen Peterson and Fead. Mr. Bartel declared the meeting adjourned for lack_ quorum. City Cf1'er� MINUTES OF MEETING December 9, 1971 The City Council of the City of Fort Collins met in regular session at 1:30 P.M.,in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building on Thursday, December 9, 1971, Present: Absent: Also present: Mayor Carson presided. DISPENSING OF MINUTES Councilmen Carson, Councilwoman Preble, Councilmen Peterson and Fead. Councilman Lopez. Tom Coffey, City Manager Arthur E. March, City Attorney Charles Liquin, Director of Public Works Motion was made by Councilwoman Preble, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that the minutes of the regular meeting of November 24, 1971 , be dispensed with. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 2A The Merchant of the Month award was presented to Harold S. Bowen of Bowen's Book Store, at 158 South College Avenue, by Darrel Watson and Jerry Harrison, who stated his place of business was well kept and neat, and that Mr. Bowen checks the whole building before he leaves to go home. AGENDA ITEM 2B "Hi Mom" Contest Ray Griffith, representing the Communication Workers of America, was present and stated that Mrs. Pruett had contacted him and suggested a campaign be started through the news media, to try to get all the calls overseas paid for at Christmas.. Councilwoman Preble drew the names who were Mrs. Lester Krist of Estes Park, Mrs. Richard Randolf of Loveland, and Mrs. Wm. Schild of 314 Whedbee Street; these Mothers will receive a free call to their son overseas. AGENDA ITEM 2C Jerry Lameiro, a member of the local Social Action Committee, was present stating that he was a graduate of C.S.U. and a resident of Fort Collins, and asked the Council for public support. He said there were 70 volunteers in this committee, some from the University and other residents , that their purpose is to help those that cannot help themselves, ie, to repair housing for the elderly and low income people. Ile said the committeehadtheir own lawyer, architect and building contractor and that they had members who could/most anything in -the way of repairing houses. He showed a chart of the entire organization, stating that they worked through neighbor to neighbor and the clearing house. He said people report to them the work that needs to be done, that there are 6 working_groups, 5 people to a group, but that the workers need money and material for these repairs. Barbara Bowman was present, stating she was a volunteer for the committee and worked through the Welfare Department, that she receives the work orders, that the work groups work on Saturday. Mr. Lameiro said they would like to get a public relations campaign started, and work through the Council and newspaper, that 60 to 80% of the businesses will help them. Councilwoman Preble asked how a Senior Citizen would contact them, and was informed that they could be reached through the clearing house. He said they have people who are very skilled and would welcome anyone who would like to help and spend one or two hours a week. Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that this report be received and endorsed this kind of activity, stating it was a very commendable endeavor. Upon a roll call, all members voted in the affirmative. Mr. Lameiro was told to keep in touch with the City. AGENDA ITEM 3A RENEWAL OF FERMENTED MALT BLVERAGE LICENSE BY PRYNTHA J. JONES DBA SPORTSMAN BAR, 210. WALNUT 101 December_9.,_19.7.1 ir— RLPURI: FROM: Ralph M. Smith, Chief of Police On June 5, 1971, one of my officers issued a warning summons to this establishment for failing to have a City license for their pool table. They were given five days in which to obtain this license, and they did comply. Since this is the only violation that we have on record, I know of no reason why this license should be denied. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Ralph M. Smith Chief of Police Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman Fead, that this renewal be approved. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 4A ORDINANCE NO. 62, 1971 BEING AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A STREET IN THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS Motion was made by Councilwoman Preble, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that Ordinance No. 62, 1971, be adopted. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 4B ORDINANCE NO. 64, 1971 — BEING AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CREATION AND ORGANIZATION OF CONSOLIDATED SIDE6VALK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 3, PROVIDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS THEREIN, AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS TO PAY THE COSTS OF CONSTRUCTION THEREOF Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that Ordinance No. 64, 1971, be approved. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM SA RESOLUTION 96A-71 —" OF THE COUNCIL 01' 'FHE Ci.'fl' OF FORT COLI,TNS '1'i2ANSPi:idRING FUNDS BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS. WHEREAS, under Section 15, Article V of the City Charter, the Council of the City of Fort Collins is authorized to transfer funds between appropri- ations by resolution; and WHEREAS, the Director of Finance has recommended that funds in the amount of $52,800.00 be transferred from the following General Fund appropri- ation accounts: Municipal Court $ 1,500.00 Insurance Fi Retirement 18,000.00 Police 18,000.00 Fire 13,500.00 Building Inspection ],0000 Library 2,000.00 $ 52,800.00 to the following appropriation accounts: City Council 7,000.00 2,500.00 Finance F 380.00 City Attorney 00.00 Information F, Research 11,200.00 Streets and Alleys 4,000.00 Buildings and Grounds l0 000.00 Traffic and Street Lights 3,900.00 Parks 1,700.00 Recreation 0.00 Swimming Pool 5 000.00 Grandview Cemetery ,85.00 Roselawn Cemetery 475.00 ,320 Transfers 5 Cap. Impr. Revolving ,20.00 $ 55,27S.00 Less Double Budget 2,475.00 $ 52;800.00 102 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that the Director of Finance be and he hereby is authorized to transfer funds herein above designated. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 9th day of December, A.D. 1971. ATTEST: City Clerk---' Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that this resolution be adopted. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM SB ORDINANCE NO. 66, 1971 BEING AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING THE SUM OF $18,325.00 OUT OF SURPLUS IN THE SPECIAL ASSESS- MENTS FUND, THE SUM OF $425.00 OUT OF SURPLUS IN THE PARK ACQUISITION FUND, THE SUM OF $124,000.00 OUT OF SURPLUS IN THE GOLF COURSE FUND, THE SUM OF $410,000.00 OUT OF SURPLUS IN THE SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND, AND THE SUM OF $30,000.00 OUT OF SURPLUS IN THE GENERAL FUND Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that Ordinance No. ' 66, 1971, be considered favorably on first reading and presented for final passage on the 23rd day of December, 1971. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 6A AMENDMENT TO BLACK AND VEATCH CONTRACT COMMUNICATIONS: Dear Mayor Carson: We were pleased to have Gordon Clyde, Don Reynolds, Lynn Greenwood and yourself at the.,last Associated Contractors meeting. We think it is good to discuss our common problems and work together toward their solution. As a result of this discussion it did appear to our Association that there was really very little in the way of a firm commitment that could be relied upon for immediate relief of many of the persistant problems. We realize the dollar volume increase may be quite high, but large jobs coming in at any given time can completely distort the true implication of additional work required by the City. The contractors continue to be apprehensive about the explanations given. This problem is not new nor is it periodic. It appears to our Association that the problem is chronic, and tends only to worsen. A few years back it was possible to get a permit in an hour's time. The City later requested 24 hours to process plans. This drifted into a few days. Now it may very well take a minimum of two weeks, or more, to process a simple house plan, and much longer if there are any complications at all. We are sure that Members of the City Council surely must see the reason for our growing concern. The building industry is without question the largest industry in Fort Collins and thus affects more peoples' livelihood than any other. It seems incongruous to us to allow these conditions to continue. Here is a multi -faceted industry that is being effectively throttled at one stage of its operation. The subdividers and builders have been painted many colors recently. They have been purported to be money grabbers, free loaders, and responsible for the population explosion, school congestion, and unbalanced ecology, to mention a few. We submit that there certainly would be a much greater distortion in our society than presently exists if it were not for the building industry. Pressing housing demand is one of the paramount needs of our country. Few things would help our society more than the ability for the construction industry to provide decent housing at a lower price. We feel that every effort should be made toward this end, and certainly efficient administration of the industry is mandatory to accomplish this end. The Subdividers and Builders do not want, nor do they expect, to be subsidized. An objective and constructive evaluation of the entire present fee system is certainly acceptable to our industry. We have received no information from the City indicating the amounts of money received by the City from the building industry or how it has been spent, and yet it has been inferred for many years that we are not paying our fair share. What is this assumption based on? It is extremely difficult to understand how it can be reasonably asserted that the building of new homes and apartments creates conditions in which the new properties are not paying their way. The taxes these properties pay go on year after year and the large majority pay from $500.00 annually up to several thousand dollars annually. We know there are hundreds of homes in Fort Collins getting all of the same services and amenities as the new properties and only pay $200.00 or less, annually in taxes. We think that an unbiased, in depth analysis of this entire problem might reveal some very different discrepancies from those now suggested. The building industry would welcome this impartial, in depth type study. We suspect that the newer homes are really the true backbone of our present tax structure, and we question whether it is wise or prudent to burden it further. We think that a more simplified processing system should be immediately put into effect to speed up plan processing. Put more of the responsibility onto the field inspectors where the corrections, if any, can be made at job -site. A reasonable point to change the processing procedure might be on all buildings of a residential nature below four stories in height. Our Association remains willing to meet and work with the City in developing a better and more efficient administration for the building industry. Very sincerely yours, BOARD of DIRECTORS of the ASSOCIATED BUILDING CONTRACTORS Avery L. Fetner, President Dear Mr. Liquin: In the following paragraphs, we will try to define the scope of work and the basis of payment for the additional studies you have requested in connection with our current water and sewer rate study. These additional studies are to provide data that the City can use in determining charges for connection to the Fort Collins Water and Sewer Utilities. The additional work will use the study in progress as a base. The scope of the additional work the Engineers propose to do is as follows: 1. Starting in 1965, or when adequate records are reasonably available, determine the major capital expenditures through the latest fiscal year. Starting with the existing customers on the system in 1965 (or later starting year), allocate the actual capital expenditures between the existing 1965 customers and the new, or growth, customers added to the system since 1965. 2. Using the major capital improvement program projected through 1976 that will have been developed for the base rate study, allocate the' projected capital expenditures to growth customers (new since 1965), and existing customers, (1965). 3. Using actual and projected capital expenditure figures, estimate the total capital investments per growth customer. Consideration shall be given for the amounts of reserve capacity in the various components of each of the utilities at the beginning and the end of the study period. 4. Review the cash flow through the study period along with the existing rate structures and estimate the amount of the capital improvement program that has been and will be supported by the growth customers through existing rates and charges, along with the net effect on the existing customers (1965). 104 December 9, 1971 Under the present contract, the Engineers are working on a cost plus basis with a top limit of $28,000.00. The additional work shall be done on the same cost plus basis as outlined in the current contract and the top limit shall be increased $3,500.00; from $28,000.00 to $31,500.00. We believe this scope of work will accomplish the additional studies that you requested. It may be that the City will want other alternatives considered in addition to what has been anticipated here. While we believe the additional work outlined here will provide the basis for establishing the policy necessary to determine plant investment fees, additional studies can be made with a minimum effort when and if it proves desirable. We believe the continuation of the cost plus basis is good and that the increase in the top limit is reasonable. If you are in agreement with the conditions outlined herein, please sign one copy and return it to us. Very truly yours, BLACK & VEATCH -Dw` ight R. Say s t Councilman Fead stated that the Council needs this information from Black and Veatch and it was his opinion that this price is reasonable. Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that this new contract be approved. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 6B - Removed. AGENDA ITEM 6C BIDS FOR 30,500 feet of u.g. cable for Light & Power Department COMMUNICATION MEMORANDUM TO: Stanley R. Case, Director of Utilities FROM: Robert A. Kost, Senior Electrical Engineer SUBJECT: Hi -voltage cable specification. RE: Req'n. 304-2579 for 50,500 feet of 750 KCM cable. This memorandum is written for the purpose of relating the sig- nificant results that are being attained through detailed per- formance and cost evaluation analysis in speciFication prepara- tion. While the prime consideration of specification writing is to insure quality, cost factors are of nearly equal importance and are an inseparable part of the specification preparation. In the case of the referenced purchase requisition the $44,670.13 recommended award, represents a savings of $30,800.00 when com- pared to the last landed cost of this stock item when purchased prior to the current specification. Additionally, savings of more than $25,000.00 were realized on each of two 1/0 15 KV cable purchases made in the past 12 months. Insulation material and neutral size design were the key cost saving features of the specification. While this magnitude of gain is not typical of all specifications, there are numerous savings in this and similar actions that we are able to realize through detailed analysis. Because these purchases are generally of a repetitive nature, they yield multiplied and continuing benefits. Mr. Tim Sagen is responsible for specification preparation and analysis. His performance is commendable; several of Mr. Sagen's specifications have attracted attention in the formation of national standards specifications. A Vr^ 1 105. December 9, 1971 Tom Sagen, Electrical Engineer, and E. M. Kuppinger, Purchasing Agent, recommended that General Cable Corporation, the low bidder, be awarded the bid of $44,670.03. Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that the recommendation of the Purchasing Agent be accepted. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 6D BIDS FOR 1/2 TON PICKUP FOR LIGHT & POWER DEPARTMENT i Ton Pick-up Truck with Side Packs. Mr. Warren Dalke, Supt. of Transmission $ Distribu- tion, has evaluated the bids and all specifications have been met by the low bidder. The recommendation is that Markley Motors be awarded the contract in the amount of $3,815.00. Respectfully submitted, /s/ E. M. Kuppinger Purchasing Agent Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that the recommendation of the Purchasing Agent be accepted. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 7A REPORT OF PLANNING F, ZONING BOARD Item# 137-71. Consider rezoning petition involving approximately 50 acres from R.L, to 7.? zone. Location: Bounded by Prospect Street on the north, Stuart Street on the south, and South Shields on the east Petitioner: Heritage Square, Ltd., Charles L. Rhoades, General Partner. Recommendation: The Planning $ Zoning Board considered this item at its December 6, 1971 meeting and recommends the property be zoned RP. P.-ter discussion concerning the quality of the streets, whether dedicated or undedicated, motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilman eterson, that the recommendation o' the Planning F, Zoning Board be approved and the matter be referred to the City Attorney for the necessary resolution and notice of hearing. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. Councilman Fead said this motion be made with the understanding that he see the preliminary plat. AGENDA ITEM 7B ITEM 143-71. Consider rezoning petition involving approximately 6.2 acres from RP, Planned Residential zoning to BP, Planned business zoning. Location: The southeast corner of the intersection of Prospect Street and Lemay Avenue. Petitioner: Spring Creek Farms, Inc., Edwin E. Johnson, President and International In- vestments and Management Corp., Inc.; Norman J. Morfield, Chairman of the Board. Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Board considered this item at its December 6, 1971, meeting and recommends denial. It was the feeling of the Board that if there is a neighbor- hood center in this area, it should be located within the neighborhood rather than at the intersection of arterial streets. Motion was made by Councilman Fead, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board be accepted. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 7 C REPORT 148.-71. Consider petition to vacate the south 140 feet of the north -south alley of Block 315, Capital Hill Addition to the City of Fort Collins. Location: North of Sycamore Street and 175 feet west of Park Street Petitioners: Wm. P. Kintzley and David C. and Lois E. Rairdon I Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Board considered this item at its December 6, 1971, Wmeeting and recommends approval. /s/ Rick Cisar Rick Cisar Acting Secretary Motion was made by Councilwoman Preble, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that the recommenda- tion of the Planning and Zoning Board be accepted and the matter be referred to the City voted Attorney the e re toe necessary ordinance. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council 106 AGENDA ITEM 7D REPORT 150-71. Consider vacation of 6 foot utility easements located on the east line of Lot 5 and west line of Lot 5 and west line of Lot 6 of the South Taft Hill Subdivision. Location: North of West Plum Street, 300 feet east of South Taft Hill Road. Petitioner: Alan R. Porter Recommendation; The Planning and Zoning Board considered this item at its December 6, 1971, meeting and recommends approval. Rick Cisar ng Secretary Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that the recommenda- tion of the Planning and Zoning Board be accepted and the matter be referred to the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 7E qw-10y1i #147-71. Consider signs for the Dellenbach Chevrolet Unit Development Plan. Location: Approxiqk mately 100' So. of Swallow Dr., extended and west of South College Avenue. Qtec�lmompend'ation. ITiel annhng and Zoning Board considered this item at its December 6, 1971, meeting, and recommends approval of the principal free-standing sign, the "Service" sign, the "Body Shop" sign and the Wall sign located on the front canopy; and denial of the two "OK Used Cars" in that only one free-standing sign is permitted for any property per street frontage. Don Reynolds, the Planning Director, stated that at the time of the development plat, they had not decided what signs they would use., that the roof type sign was approved because of the heighth of the back ground of the building extending above the sign. He said how far the high part is from the sign will have to be considered. Councilman Fead asked what the set back was from the sign. Mr. Reynolds said it was about 30 feet, that the requirement was 50 feet. Mayor Carson stated they would like to get away from roof top signs and that in his opinion this would leave the door open for others, and thought this should be denied. After discussion, motion was made by Councilman Peterson, that this matter be tabled for further consideration, and asked the planner to discuss this with the developer. This was seconded by Councilman Fead. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. [Wi 177 uRKWIF.11oil]�Il Gentlemen There has been considerable effort exerted in an attempt to persuade Governor Love to place on the legislative agenda a resolution effecting a change of date of the celebration of Arbor Day, in the January short session. Arbor Day is presently being observed on days other than the last Friday in April. The re- quested change would result in a national cele- bration. The combined participation of all cities will result in much more meaningful and effective activities. This is a request that the council designate the last Friday of April as Fort Collins Arbor Day in order to coordinate our celebration with the state and national celebration of Arbor Day on the last Friday. Sincerely W. Doyle Kincaid President Kincaid Tree Surgery 107 December 9, 1971 The City Manager presented and read the following communication: City Council City Hall Fort Collins, Colorado Re: Sidewalks-Pitkin to Prospect, along E. side of Shields. I was under the impression that the above sidewalk project would come up for a hearing. In the absence, and in lieu, of such would you please consider the following views of citizens affected? Justification for the project are stated or implied to be pressures from the community around Bennett school for sidewalks for access to school and for pedestrian traffic on S. Shields. Volume of traffic from the south to the school may justify a sidewalk. It was understood that in exchange for permission to erect a stoplight serving the school, with utility poles on private land, a sidewalk across one property was to be provided cooperatively between the city and school board. Such would have taken care of about half the need. From that stoplight north along Shields' east side there are only three residences and no Bennett school pupils with the university beyond. Thus school traffic from the north does not justify a sidewalk. Pedestrian traffic on Shields is minimal and about the same or slightly greater along the west side; about as much of it is bicycle and horseback traffic as foot traffic. The settled nature of the north end of Shields next to the university with dormitories developed out to Shields raises doubts about much growth in pedestrian or school traffic from that segment of the community. However, the other end of Shields, southwest of Prospect and Shields, very likely will develop a much greater volume of traffic, particularly along the west side of Shields, for students going to Bennett school and for residents going to shops in the newly developing area depending upon the mix of residences and businesses planned there. These points pose questions for city planners whether sidewalks are needed and where, but also whether a six -lane expansion of Shields Street will not be needed in two or three years, if not already, causing the sidewalks to be displaced almost immediately. Under terms for carrying out this sidewalk project, outlined undiplomatically by City Manager, I feel that we have no alternative but to acquiesce and accept his offer, grant an easement for the utility lines with certain contingencies, and proceed to construct the sidewalks by bid arrangement. Contingencies are that residents be permitted to replace their hedges to protect properties from litter and from children crossing or congregating on premises. Also, it seems reasonable that the city assume responsibility for replacing the sidewalk for a certain period of years in case of excessive cracking or settling due to poorly packed base or uneven settling associated with the wintertime project planned, or in the event the street is soon widened and displaces the sidewalk because of expansion outside our community, e.g., beyond Prospect along Shields. Mr. Botteron, your Light and Power Dept. contact man, was tactful and tried to answer our questions and allay our concerns. Nevertheless, it is regrettable that the citizen is not courteously informed and brought into discussions prior to passing resolutions affecting him, to avoid this act of waving a condemnation alternative around like the big stick used in other than democratic countrie�h actioon Tony leans to ac- quiescence under duress and ill eelings. � I Mayor Carson stated this needs further follow up. Mayor Carson stated that he will have a report on the Council's meeting in Hawaii when they get their notes together. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Councilwoman Preble, seconded by Coun adjourn. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council Council adjourned. ATTEST: ity Clerk.._ an Fead, that the Council ed in the affirmative and the