HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES-08/02/1977-Regular1
1
1
August 2, 1977
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
Council - Manager Form of Government
Regular Meeting - 5:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins
was held on Tuesday, August 2, 1977 at 5:30 p.m..in the Council
Chambers in the City of Fort Collins City Hall. Roll call was
answered by the following Councilmembers: Bloom, Bowling,
Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. (Note: Councilman St. Croix
arrived at 6:15 p.m. and Councilwoman Gray arrived at 8:00 p.m.)
Staff Members Present: Lanspery, Krempel, Kaplan, Jones, Liley,
Wood, Rodenbeck, Thexton, Harmon, Waido,
Deibel and Dowell.
Also: City Attorney Arthur March, Jr.
Minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of June 28, 1977;
the Regular Meetings of July 5 and 19th, 1977,
and the Special Meeting of July 12, 1977
Approved as Published
Councilman Suinn made a motion, seconded by Councilman Wilkinson
to approve the minutes of the adjourned meeting of June 28, 1977,
the regular meetings of July 5 and 19th, 1977, and the special
meeting of July 12, 1977 as published. Yeas: Councilmembers
Bloom, Bowling, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
Ordinances Adopted on Second Reading Amending
the Subdivision Regulations and Amending the Zoning
Ordinance Relating to P.U.D.'s
Following is the City Manager's memorandum regarding this matter:
426
"Both Ordinance No. 91, 1977, and Ordinance No. 92, 1977 pertain
to changes to the City's existing review procedure for subdivision
plats and P.U.D. plans. Ordinance No. 91 changes the review '
procedure for subdivision plats by eliminating the requirement
that final plats be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
No. 92 deletes from the P.U.D. Ordinance the requirement that
final P.U.D. plans be considered by the Planning and Zoning
Board.
These are staff -initiated ordinances which are intended to stream-
line the development review procedures at the Planning and Zoning
Board level and to give the City Council an earlier and more
participatory role in subdivision proposals.
Ordinance No. 91, 1977, and Ordinance No. 92, 1977, were both
approved on first reading at the July 19, 1977, City Council
meeting."
Councilman Suinn made a motion, seconded by Councilman Wilkinson
to adopt Ordinance No. 91, 1977 on second reading. Yeas:
Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson.
Nays: None.
ORDINANCE NO. 91 , 1977
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
SECTIONS 99-4 B AND 99-4 C (1)
OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS '
BEING PARTS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
AND RELATING TO THE APPROVAL PROCEDURE
FOR SUBDIVISION PLATS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS:
Section 1. That Section 99-4 B of the Code of the City of
Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows:
"B. Preliminary plat. After or at the time of submission
of the vicinity sketch map, a subdivider shall present
to the Planning Director a preliminary plat of the
area being subdivided. Such preliminary plat shall
be processed in the following manner:
(1) The subdivider shall provide the Planning Director.
with twenty (20) copies of the preliminary plat.
At the time of the filing of the preliminary plat,
the subdivider shall pay a fee in the amount of
fifty dollars ($50.) to cover the cost of review.
The Planning Director shall, when appropriate,
furnish the following agencies and offices with
a copy of such plat for review and comments:
427
(a) fire Department.
(b) Department of Light and Power.
' (c) Department of Parks and Recreation.
(d) Department of Engineering Services.
(e) Public Service Company.
(f) Telephone Company.
(g) Ditch and Irrigation Companies.
(h) Public School District.
(i) State Highway Department.
(j) Larimer County.
(k) Post Office.
(1) City Attorney.
(m) Department of Water and Sewer.
Such offices and agencies shall advise the Planning
Director of any objections to such plat within seven
(7) days after the receipt of the same, and failure
to object within such seven (7) days shall constitute
approval by such office or agency..
(2)
Within thirty (30) days after the preliminary plat has
been submitted to the Planning Director, the Planning
Director shall place the matter on the agenda for the
next timely meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board.
At such meeting the,Planning and Zoning Board shall
review the preliminary plat and shall make recommendations
to the City Council either approving, approving
conditionally or rejecting the plat.
(3)
The matter shall then be scheduled on the agenda for
the City Council which shall take final action on the
preliminary plat, either approving, approving with
conditions, or disapproving such plat or referring.
the same back to the Planning and Zoning Board for
further review and recommendations.
(4)
In taking action on a preliminary plat, the Planning
and Zoning Board and the City Council shall consider
any comments received from agencies or offices receiving
copies of the preliminary plat.
428
(5) Approval of a preliminary plat shall be valid for a
period of two (2) years, and in the event that the
final plat covers only a portion of the territory '
covered by the preliminary plat, such approval of
the preliminary plat shall be automatically renewed
for additional periods of two (2) years following
the approval of each final plat unless the Planning
and, Zoning Board notifies the subdivider to the
contrary.
(6) All preliminary plats shall be made at a scale of
either one (1) inch equals fifty (50) feet or one (1)
inch equals one hundred (100) feet, and shall be on .
a reproducible medium of one (1) or more sheets with
outer dimensions.of twenty-four by thirty-six
(24 x 36) inches and shall contain the following
information:
(a) The proposed name of the subdivision.
(b) Location and boundaries of the subdivision,
tied to an official United States. government
survey.
(c) The names and addresses 6f the subdivider and
the engineer or surveyor preparing the plat.
(d) The date of preparation, the scale and a symbol
designating true North.
(e) The total acreage contained in the subdivision. '
(f) The location and dimensions for all existing
.streets, alleys, easements and watercourses within
and adjacent to the subdivision and the names of
all such streets.
(g) The location and dimensions for all proposed
streets, alleys, easements, lot lines and areas
to be reserved or dedicated for parks, schools,
or other public uses and the names of all such
streets.
(h) Topography at two -foot intervals.
(i) Designation of any area subject to inundation.
W Land -use breakdown, including number of
residential lots and typical lot sizes.
429
ii
(k) Proposed sites, if any, for multifamily residential
use, business areas, industrial areas, churches or
other nonpublic uses exclusive of one -family
' residential areas.
(1) Zoning on and adjacent to the subdivision.
(m) The names of abutting subdivisions or the names
of the owners of abutting unplatted property.
(n) The location and size of existing utilities within
or adjacent to the subdivision.
(o) Such additional information as may be required
by the Planning Director in order to adequately
describe proposed utilities systems, surface
improvements or other construction projects
contemplated within the area to be subdivided.
(7) In the event that the preliminary plat does not include
adjoining property in the same ownership, a
development plat shall also be required which shall
show the entire adjoining property owned by the
developer and shall designate proposed land use,
suggest street layout, major land forms and natural
drainage courses. Twenty (20) copies of such
development plan shall be provided. The scale for such
development plan shall be the same,as that required
for a preliminary plat."
Section 2. That Section 99-4 C (1) of the Code of the City of
Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows:
"(1) The final plat shall be processed as follows:
(a) The subdivider shall supply the original signed final
plat and twenty (20) copies to the Planning Director.
The following fees shall be paid at such time to
cover the cost of processing and filing the final plat:
1 Subdivision of one (1) to four (4) lots, twenty-
five dollars ($25.) plus recording costs of ten
dollars ($10.)"per sheet.
2 Subdivision of five (5) or more lots and sub-
division plats in connection with unit development
plan, fifty dollars ($50.) plus recording costs
of ten dollars ($10.) per sheet.
1 430
(b) The Planning Director shall review such final plat
and shall furnish copies to the offices and agencies
which reviewed the preliminary plat for their '
review and comments. Such offices and agencies
shall advise the Planning Director of any objections
to such plat within seven (7) days after the receipt
of the same, and failure to object within such
period shall constitute approval by such office or
agency.
(c) The Planning Director shall review the final plat
and any continents received from agencies or offices
having copies of the final plat and within thirty
(30) days after such plat has been submitted to
the Planning Director, shall either approve,
conditionally approve or disapprove the same and
shall advise the subdivider of his actions. In
the event the plat is conditionally approved or
disapproved, the reason and/or conditions shall
be set forth in writing.
(d) In the event the actions of the Planning Director are
not satisfactory to the subdivider, the subdivider may
so advise the Planning Director, and in such event the
matter of the final plat shall be placed on the
agenda of the next timely meeting of the Planning and
Zoning Board. At such meeting the Planning and Zoning '
Board shall recommend to the City Council approval,
conditional approval or disapproval of the plat, taking
into consideration any comments received from,agencies
or offices receiving copies of the plat._
(e) After action has been taken on the final plat- --
either by the Planning Director or the Planning
and Zoning Board, the Planning Director shall
submit the plat, together with the recommendations
thereon, to the City Council.
(f) Upon receipt of the plat and the recommendations
thereon, the City Council shall either approve,
approve with conditions or disapprove the final
plat, or refer the same to the Planning and Zoning
Board for further review and recommendations.
(g) After a final subdivision plat -has been finally
approved, the City Clerk shall cause the final plat
to be recorded in the office of the Larimer County
Clerk and Recorder.
431
1
Introduced, considered favorably on first reading and ordered
published this 19th day of July , A.D. 1977, and to be presented
for final passage on the 2nd day of August , A.D. 1977
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Passed and adopted on final reading this 2nd
A.D. 1977.
ATTEST:
City Clerk epu Y
First Reading: July 19, 1977
Second Reading: August 2, 1977
Dates Published: July 24, 1977
Attest:
Deputy City Clerk
(Vote: Yeas:
(Vote: Yeas:
and August 7, 1977
day of August
6, Nays: 0)
5, Nays: 0)
Councilman Wilkinson made a motion, seconded by Councilman Russell
to adopt Ordinance No. 92, 1977 on second reading. Yeas: Council -
members Bloom, Bowling, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
432
ORDINANCE NO. 92 , 1977
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
SECTION 118-83 F (3) (e) OF THE
CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
BEING A PART OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND RELATING TO THE APPROVAL PROCEDURE
OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY.OF FORT COLLINS:
Section 1. That Section 118-83 F (3) (e) of the Code of .the
City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended to read
as follows:
"(e). Approval. The final plan shall be submitted to the
Planning Director, who shall recommend approval of
the same to the City Council unless the final plan
fails to conform to the approved preliminary plan and,
the requirements of this section. In the event the
actions of the Planning Director are not satisfactory
to the developer, the developer may so advise the.
Planning Director, and in such event the matter of
the final development plan shall be placed on the
agenda of the next meeting of the Planning and Zoning
Board. At such meeting, the Planning and Zoning
Board shall either recommend to the City Council
approval, conditional approval or disapproval of the
plan. After review and recommendation from either
the Planning Director or the Planning and Zoning
Board, the final plan shall be submitted to the City
Council for final action. "
Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered
published this 19th day of July , A.D. 1977, and to be
presented for final passage on the end d of A11211st A.D. 1977.
yor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Passed and adopted on final reading this 2nd day of August
A.D. 1977. /7 -
ATTEST:
City Clerk Deputy
1
1
433
First Reading: July 19, 1977 (Vote: Yeas: 6, Nays: 0)
' Second Reading: August 2, 1977 (Vote: Yeas: 5, Nays: 0)
Dates Published: July 24, 1977 and August 7, 1977
Attest:
Deputy City Clerk
Ordinance Adopted on Second Reading Amending
the Subdivision Ordinance Relating to Utility Agreements
This ordinance changes the name of the utility agreement to
"subdivision improvement agreement" and was passed on first
reading at the Council meeting on July 19,.1977.
Councilman Suinn made a motion, seconded by Councilman Wilkinson
to adopt Ordinance No. 93, 1977 on second reading. Yeas: Council -
members Bloom, Bowling, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
ORDINANCE NO. 93 , 1971
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 99-4 C (3)
AND 99-6 G OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
BEING A PART OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
AND RELATING TO UTILITY AGREEMENTS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS:
Section 1. That Section 99-4 C (3) of the Code of the City of
Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended by adding thereto
at the end thereof an additional subsection (n) to read as follows:
"(n) Appropriate space for the certification of approval
by the Director of Engineering Services of a signed
subdivision improvement agreement."
Section 2. That Section 99-6 G of the Code of the City of Fort
Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended by deleting therefrom the
heading thereof, consisting of the phrase, "Utility plat agreement",
.and substituting therefor the phrase, "Subdivision Improvement
Agreement".
1 434
Introduced, considered favorably on first reading and ordered
published this 19th day of July A.D. 1977, and to be
presented for final passage on the end day of August ,,A.D.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Passed and adopted on final reading this end day of August
A.D. 1977.
yor
ATTEST:
OC r 610 ...✓ Phi Q Q
City Clerk (Deputy)
1977. '
First Reading: July 19, 1977 (Vote: Yeas: 6, Nays: 0)
Second Reading: August 2, 1977 (Vote: Yeas: 5, Nays: 0)
Dates Published: July 24, 1977 and August 7, 1977
Attest:
Deputy C ti y Clerk
435
1
Ordinance Adopted on Second Reading
' Annexing the Harmony Annexation
The City Manager's memo regarding this is as follows:
"Ordinance No. 94, 1977, was passed on first reading at the
July 19, 1977, City Council meeting.
This ordinance annexes 234.8 acres located east of Lemay Avenue
and south of Warren Lake. Zoning for this tract is covered
in a separate item of this agenda."
Councilman Russell made a motion, seconded by Councilman Wilkinson
to adopt Ordinance No. 94, 1977 on second reading. Yeas: Council -
members Bloom, Bowling, Russell and Wilkinson. Nays: Councilman
Suinn.
THE MOTION CARRIED
ORDINANCE NO. 94 , 1977
BEING AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE
HARMONY ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
WHEREAS, heretofore, a written petition, together with four prints
of an annexation map was filed with the City Clerk of the City of Fort
Collins requesting the annexation of certain territory more particularly
described below to the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found and determined and does hereby
find and determine that said petition is in substantial compliance with
the provisions of Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, Section 31-8-107 as
amended; and
WHEREAS, the owners of 100% of the property to be annexed have
petitioned for said annexation; and
WHEREAS, not less than one -sixth (1/6th) of the perimeter of the
area to be annexed is contiguous with the City of Fort Collins and a
community of interest exists between the territory to be annexed and
the City of Fort Collins and the territory to be annexed is urban or
will be urbanized in the near future and such territory is integrated
or is capable of being integrated with the City of Fort Collins; and
WHEREAS, none of the provisions of Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973,
Section 31-8-105 as amended, are violated by the annexation of this
territory to the City; and
1 436
WHEREAS, no election is required under the provisions of Colorado
Revised Statutes, 1973, Section 31-8-107(2) as amended, and no additional
terms and conditions are to be imposed in connection with this annexation; '
and
WHEREAS, the territory is eligible for annexation and the City
Council desires to annex the same to the City of Fort Collins.
NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS:
Section 1. That all of the territory more particularly described
as situate in the County of Larimer, State of Colorado, to -wit:
A tract of land situate in the County of Larimer, State
of Colorado, to -wit: Considering the South line of the
SW k of Section 31, Townshig 7 North, Range 68 West of
the 6th_P.M. as bearing N 89 37'23",W, and with all.
bearings contained herein relative thereto 'begins at the
SW corner of said Section 31 and runs thence along the
West line of Section 6, Township 6 North, Range 68 West
of the 6th P.M. S 00010'37" W 81.00 feet to a.South right
of way line of Colorado State Highway 68; thence along
said South right of way line the following courses and
distances: S 89037123" E 28.00 feet; thence N 45016'37"
E b0.60 feet; thence S 89037'23" E 2g3.50 feet; thence S
89 54'53" E 198.00 feet; thence S 89 06'08" E 110.00 feet; '
thence N 88056'07" E 119.00 feet; thence S 89052'53" E 440.00
feet; thence S 89037'23" E 1030.80 feet; thence S 89015'23"
E 31a.50 feet; thence S 89040'53" E 655.70 feet; thence
S 88 41'08" E 115.00 feet; thence along the arc of a curve
to the right a distance of 493.4 feet (the chord of this
arc bears S 87010'53" E, a distance of 493.30 feet);
thence along the arc of a curve t8 the right 29.70 feet
(the chord gf this arc bears S 84 31'53" E 29.70 feet);
thence S 81 09'23" E 444.60 feet; thence along the arc
of a curve to the left 25.9 feet (the chord of this arc
bears S 84030'38" E 25.90 feet); thence along the arc of
a curve to the left 513.4 feet (the chord of this arc bears
S 87 09'38" E 513.20 feet); thence N 82 35'52" E 52.08 feet;
thence departing.from said South right of way line of
Colorado State Highway 68 North 00 17'33" W 168.00 feet; to
a point on the North right of way line of Colorado State
.Highway 68; thence along the North right of way line of
Colorado State Highway 68 the following courses and.
distances: N 83 56'53" W 50.10 feet; thence on the arc
of a curve to the left 488.70 feet (the chord of this arc
bears N 87012108" W 488.60 feet); thence along the arc
of a curve to the right 33.90 feet (the chord of this arc
437
bears N 84-033108" W 33.90 feet); thence N 83u05'23" W
429.88 feet to a point on the East line of the West Half
of the SE ; of said Section 31; thence departing from said
' North right of way line and along said East line N 00000'43"
E 2548.93 feet to the NE corner of the,West Half of the
SE ; of said Section 31; thence along the North line of the
South Half of said Section 31 N 89 44'55" W 3106.33 feet
to the Easterly right of way line of a County Road; thence
departing from said East-West centerline and along the
Easterly and Southerly County Road right of way line the
following cgurses and distances: S 35 29'27" W 169.92 feet;
thence S 45 26'27" W 275 10 feet; thence S 58 35'25" W
511.25 feet; thence S 00601'50" E 1882.13 feet to a point
on the Nortg right of way line of Colorado state Highway 68;.
thence N 44 57123" W 3.92 feet; thence N 89 37'23" W 27.22
feet to a point on the West line of the Soutg Half of said
Section 31; thence along said West line S 00 01150" E 170.00
feet more or less to the Point of Beginning.
be and it hereby is, annexed to the City of Fort Collins and made a
part of said City, to be known as the Harmony Annexation to the City
Section 2. That in annexing said territory to the City of Fort
Collins, the City of Fort Collins does not assume any obligation respecting
the construction of water mains, sewer lines, gas mains, electric service
lines, streets or any other services or utilities in connection with
territory hereby annexed except as may be provided for by the ordinances
' of the City of Fort Collins.
Section 3. Within ninety (90) days from the date this ordinance
becomes effective, no building permit shall be issued for any of the
lands herein described unless said lands have been zoned under the
zoning ordinances of the City.
Introduced, considered favorably on first reading and ordered
published this 19th day of July , A.D. 1977, and to be presented
for final passage on the zad day of August , A.D. 1977.
1
438
Passed and adopted on final reading this end
A . 1977.
ATTEST:
Litt' werk (DepuEy—y—
F_irnt ? en.din,r,:
Second Reading:
Dates Published:
Attest:
July 19, 1977
August 2, 1977
July 24, 1977
Deputy City Clerk
day Of August.
(Vote: Yeas: 4, Nays: 1)
(Vote: Yeas: 4, Nays: 1)
and August 7, 1977
Ordinance Adopted on Second Reading Annexing
The Cunningham Corner Annexation
The City Manager's memo regarding this item is as follows:
"This 39-acre site located at the northeast corner of South
Shields and Horsetooth Road has been petitioned for voluntary
annexation to the City and for T, Transition District zoning
classification.
As a practical matter, the site cannot be serviced by district
sanitary sewer. City water and sewer services can be made
available without difficulty. Annexation of this site would
extend the city limits between South Shields Street and South
College Avenue to Horsetooth Road with the exception of an
approximate 400-foot wide parcel between the proposed annexa-
tion and the Foothills Park Subdivision.
At its July 11, 1977, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Board
voted unanimously to recommend approval of this annexation with
the requested T, Transition zoning."
Councilman Bowling made a motion, seconded by Councilman Suinn
to adopt Ordinance No. 95, 1977 on second reading. Yeas:
Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson.
Nays: None.
1
1
THE MOTION CARRIED '
439
1
1
1
ORDINANCE NO. 95, 1977
BEING AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE
CUNNINGHAM CORNER SECOND ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
WHEREAS, heretofore, a written petition, together with four prints
of an annexation map was filed with the City Clerk of the City of Fort
Collins requesting the annexation of certain territory more particularly
described below to the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found and determined and does hereby
find and determine that said petition is in substantial compliance with
the provisions of Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, Section 31-8-107 as
amended; and
WHEREAS, the owners of 100% of the property to be annexed have
petitioned for said annexation; and
WHEREAS, not less than one -sixth (1/6th) of the perimeter of the
area to be annexed is contiguous with the City of Fort Collins and
a community of interest exists between the territory to be annexed and
the City.of Fort Collins and the territory to be annexed is urban or
will be urbanized in the near future and such territory is integrated
or is capable of being integrated with the City of Fort Collins; and
WHEREAS, none of the provisions of Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973,
Section 31-8-105 as amended, are violated by the annexation of this
territory to the City; and
. WHEREAS, no election is required under the provisions of,Colorado
Revised Statutes, 1973, Section 31-8-107 (2) as amended, and no additional
terms and conditions are to be imposed in connection with this annexation;
and
WHEREAS, the territory is eligible for annexation and the City
Council desires to annex the same to the City of Fort Collins.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS:.
Section 1. That all of the territory more particularly described
as situate in the County of Larimer, State of Colorado, to -wit:
440 .
The SW 4 of SW 4 of Section 26, Township 7 North,
Range 69 West of the 6th P.M., except considering
the West line of Section 26, Township 7 North,
Range.69 West of the 6th P X -as bearing North and
South and with all bearings herein relative thereto:
Commencing at a point on the East line.of the County
Road right of way whence the Southwest corner of
Section 26 which bears West 30 feet and again south 452
feet; thence East 187.80 feet; thence North 200 feet;
thence West 187.80 feet to a point on said right of
way line; thence along said right;of way line South
200 feet to the point of beginning.
be and it hereby is, annexed to the City of Fort Collins and made a part
of said City, to be known as the Cunningham Corner Second Annexation.
Section 2. That in annexing said territory to the City of Fort Collins,
the City of Fort Collins does not assume any obligation respecting the
construction of water mains, sewer lines, gas mains, electric service
lines, streets or any other services or utilities in connection with
territory hereby annexed except as may be provided by the ordinances of
the City of Fort Collins.
Section 3. Within ninety (90) days -from the date this ordinance
becomes effective, no building permit shall be issued for any of the lands
herein described unless said lands have been zoned under the zoning
ordinances of the City.
Introduced, considered
favorably on first reading and ordered
published this l9th day of July , A.D. 1977, and to be
final passage on the 2nd day of August , A.D. 1977.
ATTEST:
r
City Clerk
A.D
Passed and adopted on final reading this 2nd
1977.
ATTEST:
City erc (Deputy)
441
presented for
day Of August
1
1
First Reading: July 19, 1977 (Vote: Yeas: 5, Nays: 0)
' Second Reading: August 2, 1977 (Vote: Yeas: 5, Nays: 0)
Dates Published: July 24, 1977 and August 7, 1977
Attest:
Deputy CityClerTF—
Ordinance Adopted on First Reading Zoning
the Harmony Annexation
The City Manager's memorandum regarding this matter is as follows:
"At its July 19, 1977, meeting, the City Council approved on
first reading Ordinance No. 94, 1977, Annexing the Harmony Annexa-
tion. The second reading of the ordinance was considered earlier
on this agenda.
The Harmony Annexation consists of 234.8 acres located on
Harmony Road east of County Road 45 (Lemay Avenue). This annexa-
tion provides the necessary contiguity for the Harmony Second
Annexation and the one or possibly two subsequent annexations
involving the Hewlett-Packard site. It also provides the
' necessary contiguity for the Landings Annexation. Both the
Landings Annexation and the Harmony Second Annexation were
considered by the Planning and Zoning Board at its July 11, 1977,
meeting and recommended for approval.
The petitioner of the Harmony Annexation has requested the
T-Transition Zoning District. He has also hired the local
architectural and land planning firm of ZVFK and the economic
consultant firm of Hammer, Siler, George Associates to study
the development potentialities of this area. These firms have
met with the Planning Office and will be discussing various
zoning alternatives in the near future.
At its July 11, 1977, meeting the Planning and Zoning Board voted
unanimously to recommend the T-Transition Zoning District as
requested by the petitioner.
The Planning Office is preparing a report on the land use planning
alternatives for those larger areas listed below which will be
discussed by the Planning and Zoning Board in September. At
its September meeting the Board will formulate on a compre-
hensive basis zoning recommendations for the following annexa-
tions:
1. Harmony Annexation
2. Harmony Second Annexation
3. Landings Annexation
4. Cunningham Corner Annexation
5. Timberline-Horsetooth Annexation
6. Nelson-SecondAnnexation
7. Harmony Third Annexation (anticipated)
442
Councilman Bowling made a motion, seconded by Councilman Wilkinson
to adopt Ordinance No. 97, 1977 on first reading. Yeas: Council -
members Bloom, Bowling, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. '
THE MOTION CARRIED
Ordinance Tabled on First Reading Zoning the Property
Known as the Horsetooth-Timberline Annexation
The'City Attorney stated that Staff is requesting that this
matter be tabled to September 6, 1977 so that the several other
annexations in the area be completed and the zoning question be
addressed in a comprehensive manner.
Mr. Garth Rogers, attorney for the applicant, stated they were
in agreement to the tabling of this item.
Councilman Wilkinson made a motion, seconded by Councilman Bowling
to table Ordinance No. 98, 1977 on first reading to September 6,
1977. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Russell, Suinn and
Wilkinson. Nays:' None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
Ordinance Adopted on First Reading Zoning
the Cunningham Corner Second Annexation
The City Manager's memo regarding this item is as follows:
"At its July 19, 1977, meeting the City Council approved the
first reading of Ordinance No. 95, 1977, annexing the Cunningham
Corner Second Annexation. The second reading of this ordinance
was considered earlier on this agenda.
Mr. Richard Ellerby, the petitioner of this 29-acre Annexation
is contemplating recreational commercial uses for this site.
The site is located on the northeast corner of South Shields
Street and Horsetooth Road. Mr. Ellerby is requesting the
T-Transition zoning district to allow himself additional time
to_decide __on_which_Cit-y.zoning district classification would .
best accommodate his contemplated uses while receiving the
official endorsement of the City Council. At the July 19,
1977 City Council meeting, Mr. Ellerby briefly discussed his
plans with the Council and indicated that he would initiate
additional meetings with the Planning staff."
Councilman Bowling made a motion, seconded by Councilman Russell
to adopt Ordinance No. 101, 1977 on first reading. Yeas:
Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson.
Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED 443
C
1
Ordinance No. 99, 1977 Referred Back to the
' Administration on First Reading Amending
the Subdivision Regulations;
Ordinance No. 100, 1977 Adopted on First Reading
Amending the Subdivision Regulations
The City Manager's memo regarding this item is as .follows:
"On May 16, 1977, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended
to the City Council specific changes to the subdivision ordinance
City Council discussed these changes at the June 7, 1977, and
July 19, 1977, Council meetings. The proposed changes are as
follows:
Create a new street classification for the subdivision
ordinance known as a "place" which is limited in its
maximum length and number of lots. This place street
would allow for no greater than a 50-foot right of way
and a 32-foot pavement. Staff is recommending a
maximum of 11 lots with a maximum length of 350 feet.
2. Reduce the minimum front yard setback requirement for
single family dwelling units from 30 feet to 20 feet
provided that building envelopes are shown on the
subdivision plat.
' 3. Reduce the minimum side -yard requirement for single
family dwelling units from 7 feet to 3 feet, providing
that building envelopes are shown on the subdivision
plat.
4. Reduce the minimum lot frontage from 30 feet to 20 feet
for cul-de-sac lots, provided building envelopes are
shown on the subdivision plat.
These changes will allow for greater flexibility in the develop-
ment of subdivisions while our entire subdivision ordinance is
being reviewed and revised. The major overhaul of the subdivision
ordinance is scheduled to be completed by January 1, 1978.
Attached is a memo from Planning Director, Les Kaplan, describing
staff concerns with requiring building envelopes on subdivision
plats and the justification for reducing the front -yard setback
to 25 feet without a building envelope rather than 20 feet with
a building envelope.
Staff is cognizant of Council's concern for flexibility and
innovation in single-family developments. In addressing this
concern, it is important that Council distinguish between the
t P.U.D. and the standard subdivision approach to single family
development. The subdivision ordinance is not intended to
444
include detailed site plan review by the City, and therefore,
is not in our opinion the appropriate place to add design
flexibilities which require review. This is not to say that '
certain existing requirements of the subdivision ordinance
thwart flexibility because the requirements themselves may be
excessive. If this is the case, the requirements should be
changed but not replaced with those that require site plan
review.
The P.U.D. ordinance is intended to promote design flexibility
by providing for City review of the major design elements of
a proposal in relationship to one another. While the P.U.D.
ordinance should promote the opportunity for innovation in all
residential housing types, it is less applicable to single
family than multi -family developments due to the open space
and landscaping requirements. The Planning Office has already
initiated a study of the open space requirement in the existing
ordinance to determine how it might be modified in order to
achieve greater opportunity for its use in single-family
development. The attached memo from Planning Director,
Les Kaplan, describes this study.
Recommendation: The Administration recommends that:
1. Ordinance No. 99 as proposed should be changed to
allow for a minimum five-foot sideyard setback for
single family dwelling units without a building '
envelope requirement. This should be referred back
to the Administration if. Council agrees to this
recommendation.
2. Ordinance No. 99 as proposed should be changed to allow
for a minimum twenty-five (25) foot front -yard setback
for single family dwelling units without a building
envelope requirement. This should be referred back
to the Administration if Council agrees to this
recommendation.
3. The Administration should be instructed to proceed
with reviewing the existing open space and landscaping
requirements in the P.U.D. ordinance. This undertaking
would benefit from the participation of the local
design professionals who will be assisting with major
changes to the subdivision ordinance. Recommendations
for changes to the P.U.D. ordinance should be discussed
with the Planning and Zoning Board and then presented
to the City Council before the end of the year.
4. The Administration recommends that Council pass
Ordinance No. 100, 1977, Amending the Subdivision
Ordinance by adding a new street classification (place)." '
445
Paul Lanspery, the Interim City Manager, stated that the
' minimum front yard setback recommendation from staff was for
25 feet and the minimum side yard recommendation was for five
feet. Art March, City Attorney, stated that the staff is also
recommending that the building envelope be taken out of this
and put into a P.U.D. configuration and staff has previously
been instructed to come back to Council with changes to the
P.U.D. ordinance.
Councilman Wilkinson stated that if this matter was going back
to the Administration he would like some additional information
regarding the street right-of-way in relation to the front yard
setback.
Councilman Suinn stated he agreed with sending Ordinance No. 99
back to the Administration for more work and what will happen
to corner lots.
Councilman Bowling stated he understood the problems with the
building envelope; the front yard setback should be 20 feet.
Councilman Suinn made a motion, seconded by Councilman Wilkinson
to refer Ordinance No. 99, 1977 back to the Administration.
Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Russell, Suinn and
Wilkinson. Nays: None.
' THE MOTION CARRIED
Ordinance No. 100, 1977, adds the classification of "place" to
the types of streets allowed in the City of Fort Collins.
Councilman Russell made a motion, seconded by Councilman Bowling
to adopt Ordinance No. 100, 1977 on first reading. Yeas:
Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Russell and Wilkinson. Nays:
Councilman Suinn.
THE MOTION CARRIED
Resolution Adopted Establishing the
Observance of Veterans' Day
Following is the City Manager's memo regarding this item:
"Since 1971, we have celebrated Veterans' Day on the fourth
Monday in October as designated by the Federal government.
In the last year, however, there was some discussion at.the
State level about observing Veterans' Day on November 11
(the originally designated day).
446
In 1977 the State and County governments will observe Veterans'
Day on November 11, whereas the Federal government will observe I
Veterans' Day on October 24 (the fourth Monday in October). Our
Personnel Rules and Re ulations state that we will observe
Veterans ay on t e ourtMonday in October.
Council should decide whether to celebrate Veterans' Day on
November 11 or continue with observance on the fourth Monday
in October."
Councilman Bowling made a motion, seconded by Councilman
Wilkinson to insert the date of November 11 in the resolution
and adopt the resolution establishing the date for observing
Veterans' Day. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Russell,
Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLUTION 77-49
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS ESTABLISHING
THE DATE OF VETERANS' DAY
WHEREAS, since 1971, the City of Fort Collins has celebrated Veterans'
Day on the fourth Monday in October; and '
WHEREAS, in 1977, the State government will observe Veteran's Day
on November llth; and
WHEREAS, in.1977, the Federal government will observe Veterans' Day
on October 24th (the fourth Monday in October); and
WHEREAS, the City of Fort Collins Personnel Rules and Regulations
state the City will observe Veterans' Day on the fourth Monday of October;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Fort Collins needs to designate) Veterans' Day
for either the fourth Monday in October or November 11.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS that Veterans' Day will be observed by the City on Novembej,11,
447 1
1
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held
this 2nd day of August, A.D. 1977.
ATTEST:
ci o OX-A/ .AD O
City Clerk (Deputy)
Resolution Adopted Amending the Disability
Provisions of the Employee Retirement Plan
Following is the City Manager's memo regarding this item:
' "At the present time, the Employee Retirement Plan adopted by -
Council on March 4, 1971, contains a section on disability which
provides that any member who becomes totally and permanently
disabled prior to normal retirement date and after the comple-
tion of ten years or more of credited service shall be entitled
to receive a retirement benefit. It further provides that after
considering the member's needs, the Retirement Committee shall
determine the method of payment of the disability retirement
benefit. One of the methods provided for under the present
plan is a lump sum benefit payable in one or more stated install-
ments.
The Retirement Committee met on July 14, 1977, and at that time,
voted to recommend to the City Council an amendment to Section
VIII of the Retirement Plan dealing with disability. The amend-
ment would accomplish two things. First, it would make an
employee eligible for disability benefits as of the date of
employment rather than after the completion of ten years or
more of credited service. The Pension Fund Actuary has deter-
mined that this change would not require additional funding
of the Employee Retirement Plan Drimarily because any additional
benefit which would accrue to the employee as a result of
increased eligibility would be very minimal.
Secondly, the proposed amendment would eliminate lump sum pay-
' ments except in the case where the monthly benefit payment owed
448
to the employee was $25.00 or less. The latter change should
have the effect of making the retirement plan more economically
viable. In the past, several employees have been granted a t
lump sum payment in disability retirement situations and some
of the lump sum payments have been fairly substantial. The
Retirement Committee feels that to continue granting a lump
sum retirement benefit in disability situations could at some
point have an adverse impact on the viability of the retire-
ment plan.
The attached resolution would adopt the proposed amendments to
Section VIII of the current retirement plan relating to disability
benefits."
Councilman Wilkinson made a motion, seconded by Councilman Bowling
to adopt the resolution. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling,
Russell, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLUTION 77-50
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
AMENDING THE DISABILITY PROVISIONS OF THE
RETIREMENT PLAN OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
RELATING TO ELIGIBILITY FOR DISABILITY
BENEFITS AND LUMP SUM BENEFIT PAYMENTS
WHEREAS, heretofore on March 4, •1971, the City Council established
a retirement plan for employees of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Retirement Committee, being charged with the general
administration of the Retirement Plan, met on July 14, 1977, and voted
to recommend to the City Council that the disability provisions of
said Plan be amended to accomplish the following: 1) make an employee
eligible for disability benefits as of the date of employment rather
than after ten.(10) years of credited service; 2) eliminate lump sum
benefit payments for a disability retirement except in cases in which
the monthly benefit payments are twenty-five dollars ($25.00) or less;
and
WHEREAS, the accompanying document, being an amended Section VIII
of the Retirement Plan, would accomplish said changes; and
WHEREAS, such amendment would not require additional funding for
the Retirement Plan, but would provide increased benefits available to
City employees and, by eliminating lump sum payments except in limited
instances, would further have a positive impact on the viability of such
Plan.
449 1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
' COLLINS that the City retirement plan adopted by resolution of the City
Council on March 4, 1971, is amended by deleting Section VIII thereof
relating to disability and substituting therefor the attached amended
Section VIII.
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held
this 2nd day of August, A.D. 1977.
ATTEST:
1ity Lim (Deputy)
SECTION VIII - DISABILITY
Any member who becomes totally and permanently disabled prior to normal
' retirement date shall be entitled.to receive 4 retirement benefit. Such
benefit shall be equal to that portion of his normal retirement benefit
which is based upon his credited service prior to the date of disability and
will become payable to him at his normal retirement date.
Benefits payable to disabled members shall commence on the normal retire-
ment date in one of the forms of payments provided in Section VI-4 of ,this
plan; provided, however, that at the option of such member a reduced benefit
of equivalent actuarial value may be payable immediately upon such disability
for the member's life. Any payments provided for under this section shall
be subject to the provisions of Section VI-5 of this plan relating to minimum
monthly payments..
1
450
A member shall be deemed totally and permanently disabled.within the
meaning of this section if the Retirement Committee determines, upon the
basis of medical evidence, that the member is unable to engage in any sub-
stantial gainful activity of a type related to that in which such member there-
tofore engaged by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental
impairment which can be expected to •result in death or to be of long -continued
and indefinite duration.
The Retirement Committee's determination of whether the member is totally
and permanently disabled and the manner and dates of payment shall be conclusive
in each case:
If the Retirement Committee, with the support of medical evidence,
determines, that such disability has ended prior to the member's normal retire=
ment date, any disability retirement benefit payable to such member shall
cease, and if such member is re-employed by the City prior to his normal
retirement date and within 90 days of termination of disability, his status
under the Plan immediately prior to his date of disability shall be reinstated,
without impairment of his retirement benefits by reason of payments made to
him during disability, but his credited service shall not include the period
from his disability retirement date to his date of re-employment.
451
1
1
1
Resolution Adopted Approving Publications and Distribution
I
of Notice of Sale for General Obli ation Water Bonds in the
Principal Amount of 000,000
Following is the City Manager's memo regarding this item:
"This resolution is the first official action of the City Council
relating to the General Obligation Water Bond Issue. It calls
for the publication of the Notice of Sale in the Fort Collins
Coloradoan and allows for the distribution of the Notice of
Sale to investment banking firms, banks and others who may be
interested in bidding on the bonds.
The bondsale will take place on September 6, 1977, and at that
same time the first reading of the Bond Sale Ordinance will .
take place. The second reading of the Bond Sale Ordinance will
occur on September 20, 1977, and the bond proceeds should be
delivered on or about October 1, 1977.
Boettcher and Company is advising the City concerning the sale
of these bonds and the firm of Willson and Lamm are providing
legal services."
Councilman St. Croix arrived as this item came on for discussion.
' Councilman Bowling made a motion, seconded by Councilman Wilkinson
to adopt the resolution. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling,
Russell, St. Croix, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLUTION 77-51'
OF
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT COLLINS
PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION AND DISTRIBUTION
OF A NOTICE OF SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER:
BONDS AND ESTABLISHING THE FORM OF SUCH NOTICE
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is
necessary to extend and improve the municipal waterworks system
of the City, and to issue general obligation bonds in the amount
of $5,000,000 for such purpose; and .
452
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sec. 20.3 of the City Charter, '
securities issued for water purposes may be issued by Council
action without•an election on the question of issuing bonds;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that such
bonds shall be sold at a public sale and that it is necessary to
provide for the notice of sale of bonds:
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO:
1. That notice of sale of General Obligation Water
Bonds, in the principal amount of $5,000,000, shall be published
one time in - the Fort .Collins Coloradoan, Fort Collins, Colorado,
a newspaper having general circulation in the City.
2. The notice of sale shall be in substantially the
following form:
NOTICE OF SALE
GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER BONDS, SERIES 1977, $5,000j000
CITY OF FORT COLLINS, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO
SALE DATE: TUESDAY; SEPTEMBER 6, 1977
The City Council of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado,
will receive sealed bids at the Council Chambers, City Hall,_
300 LaPorte Avenue, P.O. Box 580, Fort Collins, Colorado. 805221,
until 10:00 A.M. M.S.D.T. on Tuesday, September 6, 1977, for the
purchase of $5,000,000 of General Obligation Water Bonds, Series
1977, dated October 1, 1977.
453 '
The bonds shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each,
' numbered 1 to 1,000, inclusive, shall bear interest payable
on April 1, 1978, and semi-annually thereafter on the 1st day
of April and the lst day of October each year, and shall mature
serially on October 1, as follows:
Amount _ Maturity
$ 50,000 1979 to 1984, incl.
175,000, 1985
250,000 1986 .
275,000 1987
300,000 1988
$ 325,000 1989
350,000 1990
375,000 1991
400,000 1992 and 1993
425,000 1994
450,000
1995
475,000
1996.
500,000
1997
Bonds of this issue maturing on or before October
' 1, 1988, shall not be redeemable prior to their respective
maturity dates. Those bonds maturing in the years 1989 and there-
after shall be redeemable at the option of the City, in inverse
numerical order, on October 1, 1988, and on any interest payment
date thereafter, upon payment of par, accrued interest and the
following redemption premium:
28 of principal; if redeemed from October 1,
1988 to April 1, 1990, inclusive;
1% of principal, if redeemed from October 1, 1990
to April 1, 1992, inclusive;
at par and accrued interest only, if redeemed on
or after October 1, 1992.
Principal and interest will be payable at the office
of the Director of Finance, in Fort Collins, Colorado.
The bonds will
the cost of extending and
system of the City. The
bonds will provide for th
valorem tax on all of th
without limit as to rate
principal of and interest
1
e
be issued for the purpose of paying
improving the municipal waterworks
Ordinance authorizing the issuance of
levy and collection of a general ad
e taxable property within the City,
or amount, for the payment of the
on the bonds. In addition, in the
454
ordinance authorizing the issuance of the bonds, the City will '
pledge to pay the principal of and the interest on the Bonds from
the net revenues of the municipal waterworks system. The City
also has covenanted to fix and annually to maintain rates and
charges for water and services furnished by the system which,
together with moneys on hand and available therefor, will be
sufficient to pay operation and fiaintedance expenses of the system
And the principal of and interest on all bonds and other obli-
gations of the waterworks system.
The bonds will be delivered at any bank or trust company
in Fort Collins or Denver, Colorado, or any other place at the
request and expense of the purchaser. It is anticipated that
delivery of the bonds will be made within 60 days following the
award of the bonds.
Bids may be conditioned upon receipt of the approving
legal opinion of the bond attorneys named below, but must in
any and all other respects be unconditional.
No bid for less than par and accrued interest to the
date of delivery will be accepted. The net effective interest
rate of this issue shall not exceed 7% per annum. Supplemental
or "B" interest coupons and interest coupons with a 0% interest
rate, are not allowed. One interest rate only shall be stated for
any maturity. The maximum allowable spread between the highest and
lowest interest rates is 3%. Interest rates should be stated in
multiples of twentieths or eighths of one (1) per cent. The bonds
will be awarded to the bidder naming the lowest net interest cost
to the City, which is defined as the total amount of interest to
accrue from the date of the bonds to the date of maturity, without
regard to the prior redemption provision, less the total amoufit of
cash premium bid, if any.
The City will furnish -the executed bonds, a certified
transcript of legal proceedings and the approving legal opinion.
The legality of the bonds will be approved by Messrs. Willson
and Lamm, P.C., Attorneys at Law, Denver, Colorado, whose legal
opinion will be printed on each bond. Bond counsel's approving
opinion will recite, in conventional form, that bond counsel has
examined the Constitution and Laws of the State of Colorado, the
Charter of the City and a certified copy of the record of the
proceedings of the City taken preliminary to the issuance of the
bonds, and that bond counsel has examined bond numbered one of
said issue and has found the same properly executed and in due
legal form. The opinion will express an unqualified opinion as to
legality and as to tax exemption of interest on the bonds.
455 1
' The matters passed upon by bond counsel do not extend
beyond those mentioned in the preceding paragraph and bond counsel
specifically has no responsibility for the accuracy or complete-
ness of any information furnished to any person in connection with
any offer or sale of the bonds.
The City shall reserve the right to waive any defect or
irregularity in any bid.
A cashier's check or certified check drawn on a bank or
trust company, payable to the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, in
the amount of $100,000 must accompany each bid. The check of the
successful bidder will be retained by the City as liquidated
damages in the event the bonds are not taken up and paid for in
accordance with the bid. Checks of unsuccessful bidders will be
returned immediately. Payment for the bonds must be made in
federal funds or funds acceptable to the City, at a commercial
bank or trust company. in Denver or Fort Collins, or elsewhere at
the successful bidder's request and expense.
The City Council will meet within 24 hours following
the opening of bids to consider the award of the bonds.
Additional information concerning the City and this
issue can be obtained from Mr. Ronald R. Wood, Director of
Finance or from Boettcher and Company, 828 17th Street, Denver,
Colorado, 80202 the financial consultant to the City.
1977. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL This 2nd day of August,
/s/ Ronald R. Wood
Director of Finance
Fort Collins, Colorado
Publish in: Fort Collins i'.:oloradoan
Publish on: Friday, Augusi: 19,.1977
' I � 456
3. In addition to the publication of the notice of '
sale referred to above, the Director of Finance and Boettcher and
Company, Denver, Colorado, the financial consultant to the City,
are authorized to forward a copy of the notice of sale to invest—
ment banking firms, banks and others who may be interested in
bidding on the bonds.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of August,.
1977.
( S E A L )
ATTEST:
eputy City Clerk
1
Rate Schedule for Lincoln Community Center Adopted
Following is the City Manager's memorandum regarding this item:
"At the June 21, 1977, Council meeting the proposed rate schedule
and general policies for the Lincoln Community Center were tabled
subject to their review by the capital improvement committee
of the Chamber of Commerce. This review has been completed and
the committee agrees to the proposed rate structure. Suggestions
have been made by the committee concerning operation and mainten-
ance costs as well as procedural requirements at the Center.
These suggestions will be utilized by staff as we prepare for
the opening of the facility. The work of the Chamber committee
in this area is greatly appreciated."
Mr. Lanspery, the Interim City Manager, requested that the Council
consider only the rate schedule because another work session will
be necessary for the discussion of the use of alcohol at the
Lincoln Community Center.
Councilman Wilkinson made a motion, seconded by Councilman Russell '
to approve the rate schedule for the Lincoln Community Center.
Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling, Russell, St. Croix, Suinn
and Wilkinson. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED 457
Resolution Adopted Approving Agreement
' with State Department of Highways
Following is the City Manager's memo regarding this item:
"Attached is a memo from Assistant City Attorney, Lucia Liley,
regarding an agreement with the State Department of Highways.
Although the agreement is basically the same as that which was
approved by Council on August 15, 1974, the rates paid by the
Highway Department for City services have been raised in the
proposed agreement. These proposed rates are outlined further
in the attached memo.
The proposed agreement is for one year, with a provision that
the City and the State will meet prior to termination of the
agreement to establish rates to be charged by the City."
The Assistant City Attorney's memo follows:
"The State Department of Highways has submitted the attached
agreement to the City for execution. This agreement is basic-
ally the same as the agreement between the City and Highway
Department approved by Council resolution August 15, 1974,
and providing for the assumption by the City of responsibility
' for the installation, operation and maintenance of traffic
control devices on State highways within the City with such
services paid for by the Highway Department.
The primary difference between the 1974 agreement and the
proposed agreement is that the rates paid by the Highway
Department for the City services have been raised in the
proposed agreement. The 1974 agreement provides that the
City be given $31.00 per signal per month {or a total yearly
payment of $9,300.00 for signals (the City had 25 signals
last year). The proposed agreement would allow the City to
receive $36.00 per signal per month. The City presently has
26 signals which would mean we would receive a total of
$11,232.00 for signals.
With regard to signs, the 1974 agreement specifies a payment
of $20.00 per mile per month ($240.00 per mile per year) for
a total payment to the City of $1,555.00 per year for signs.
Under the proposed agreement the $240.00 per mile per year
formula would remain the same, with the City receiving the
$1,555.00 figure for signs again this year.
The proposed agreement is for one year, with a Provision that the
City and the State will meet prior to termination of the agree-
ment to establish rates to be charged by the City. There are
' additionally some special provisions in the proposed agreement
dealing primarily with fund availability, discrimination and
affirmative action. r/
The attached resolution which approves the new agreement is
required by the Highway Department."
458
Councilman Suinn made a motion, seconded by Councilman St. Croix I
to adopt the resolution. Yeas: Councilmembers Bloom, Bowling,
Russell, St. Croix, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLUTION 77-52
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT TO BE ENTERED INTO
WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
WHEREAS, on August 15, 1974, the City Council approved an
agreement between the City of Fort Collins and the State of Colorado
Department of Highways whereby the City assumed responsibility for
the installation, operation, and maintenance of traffic control
devices on State highways within the City with such services paid for
by the Department of Highways; and
WHEREAS, the State of Colorado Department of Highways desires
to enter into a new agreement with the City of Fort Collins for a
one year period, whereby the City will continue to be responsible
for operating and maintaining traffic control devices on the State
Highway System, with such services to be paid for at increased rates
by the Department of Highways; and
WHEREAS, such an agreement has been prepared providing for the
continuation of such responsibility by the City and payment therefor
by the State Department of Highways, Division of Highways, which
agreement has been approved by the City Attorney and the City Manager;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said proposed agreement
and desires to authorize and approve the same.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FORT COLLINS that the terms and conditions of said agreement be, and
the same hereby are, accepted and approved, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager and City Clerk be,
and they hereby are, authorized and directed to execute said agreement
for and on behalf of the City of Fort Collins.
459
1
1
1
1
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held
this 2nd day of August , A.D. 1977.
ATTEST:
City Clerk (Deputy)
Report From City Manager
1) The City was notified in June that it was possibly eligible
for funds under the Public Works Employment Act under the
Economic Development Administration. To qualify, we would
need to have 4,000 people in a contiguous area with an
unemployment of 8.5%. This past week the unemployment rate
has been revised to 6.5% and the downtown and the northwest
part of town do qualify. These funds could be used for
additional capital improvements in the downtown area.
2) Home Federal Savings has given the City a letter of commit-
ment for their parking facilities for the Lincoln Community
Center.
3) Mike Powers, the new Personnel Director, started on August 2,
1977.
Report from City Council Members on Committees
Councilman Suinn reported on the meeting regarding the 208
Planning Committee. Councilman Wilkinson was in attendance
at this same meeting.
Councilman Russell stated he had missed the last meeting of
the Platte River Power Authority but did report on what the
meeting was to discuss.
Mayor Bloom stated that the Colorado Municipal League Pension
Group met and reviewed their current standing. The next meeting
will be to discuss some goals and objectives.
Councilman Bowling stated that at the next meeting of the COG
the report from the study committee on the Platte River Power
Authority is to be turned in.
460
City Council Review of Larimer County Land Use Plan
This item was discussed earlier at the short work sesion
preceding the regular meeting. The Mayor stated that a letter '
to the County will be drafted on Wednesday, August 3rd stating
the concerns of the City with regard to the Land Use Plan.
See pages 475 and 476 for the work session minutes.
Citizen Participation
Mayor Bloom was not present after the dinner break.
a. Mr. James Stilson, 1825 Manchester Drive, spoke in opposition
to the Council decision made previously on the Village West
Ninth filing and the conduct of the Council representative
from that particular area.
b. Dr. Bonsall Johnson. 1828 Manchester Drive, spoke in opposi-
tion to the Council decision on Village West Ninth and the
concerns of the residents in the area.
C. Mr. David Brown, 301 East 0live, spoke to a request for a
variance in regard to the sign code, specifically Section
118-92(B) of the Code. Mr. Art March, City Attorney, stated
that there was a variance procedure available through the
Zoning Board of Appeals.
d. Police citations to Art Lewis and Chuck Cross were presented '
in recognition for 50,000 accident free miles in a police
patrol unit.
Resolution Adopted Setting Forth City Goals and Objectives
Councilwoman Gray arrived during the discussion of this particular
item.
The City Manager's memo regarding this item follows:
"The attached City of Fort Collins "Goals and Objectives" reflect
those changes initiated by Council in June. These final changes
represent the culmination of a comprehensive process involving
citizens, boards and commissions, City staff and Council to
produce the document.
It is expected that the Goals and Objectives will serve as a
document for establishing a community direction to be followed
in future years as the City grows."
461 '
Mr. Nick Leonard spoke to the make-up of the Goals and Objectives.
' Mr. James Stilson inquired as to the school district boundaries.
Mrs. Phyllis Wells spoke to the entire process of developing the
Goals and Objectives statement.
Councilman Bowling made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Gray
to adopt the resolution. Yeas: Councilmembers Bowling, Gray,
St. Croix, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None. (Councilman Russell
out of the room.)
THE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLUTION 77-53
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
EXPRESSING APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF THE
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Fort Collins have devoted
an extraordinary amount of time and effort in developing the Goals and
Objectives; and
WHEREAS, the Goals and Objectives have been reviewed by all City
I
Departments which have provided significant input of their own; and
WHEREAS, the general public has had the opportunity to review
and comment on the Goals and Objectives through two public hearings; and
WHEREAS, the City's Boards and Commissions have had the opportunity
to review and comment on the Goals and Objectives through .three public hearings;
and
WHEREAS, the Goals and Objectives provide the opportunity for
consistency between land use decisions and the provision of public
facilities and services; and
WHEREAS, the Goals and Objectives is a foundational document which
allows considerable flexibility in determining detailed policies and
programs/projects necessary to implement them; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fort Collins will decide what
priorities will be established in implementing the Goals and Objectives; and
WHEREAS, the Goals and Objectives will be reviewed periodically by
the Council of the City of Fort Collins to insure that they represent the
values of the community
1
462
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT '
COLLINS that the City of Fort Collins hereby approves and endorses the
Goals and Objectives of the City of Fort Collins, dated June 21, 1977.
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held
this 2nd day of August, A.D. 1977.
,/ Assistant Mayor /
ATTEST: G
Deputy City Clerk
Replat of Fahrenbruch Leisure Village Subdivision,
Fourth Filing Final Plans and Plat Tabled
Following is the City Manager's memo regarding this item:
"This subdivision consists of 2.1 acres zoned R-P (Planned
Residential District) located at the south end of Leisure
Drive. The developer proposes to construct five two-story
rental townhouse apartment buildings consisting of 24 units.
This proposal was reviewed by Council at their June 21, 1977,
meeting and referred back to the Planning and Zoning Board
with the understanding that the following conditions be met:
1. The plan should be revised to provide adequate
emergency access. One acceptable solution would be
to connect the east and west parking areas with a
pedestrian walk type fire lane around the rear of
the site.
2. The plan should indicate how the parking requirements
of the P.U.D. ordinance will be met. This will
involve either adding three or more parking spaces
or specifying the number of two bedroom units.
3. Two buildings at the east end of the site should be
altered so as not to encroach on a 30-foot landscaped
buffer area along the south and west boundary of the
site adjacent to single family lots in R-L zone along
Del Clair Road and Tulane Drive.
4. Elevations of buildings should, be. submitted....
463 '
5. The subdivision plat should indicate utility easements
as well as common access easements for parking lots
' and common open space.
6. Open space maintenance guarantee and legal instrument
should be approved by City Attorney's Office.
A revised plan has been submitted which addresses these condi-
tions as described in the attached memo .from the planning staff.
Since the June 21, 1977, meeting City staff have been requested
by area residents to investigate the possibility of acquiring
either all or part of this site as a neighborhood park. The
need for a small neighborhood park in this area can be justified.
The problem, however, arises in that we would be faced with
paying a high price for a potential park site (as compared to
other park acquisition costs) because of the present commercial
value of the property. The developer is agreeable to discussing
a possible sale of a portion of his property to the City. In
order to develop a mini park (play equipment, picnic tables, etc.)
a minimum of .75 acre is necessary. To acquire this necessary
acreage at the proposed site would cost the City a minimum of
$30,000. There would also have to be an improved access lane
developed to the site from the south which would also require
additional expenses to the City. We have explored other sites
in the immediate vicinity and again because of the developed
' state of the area would be required to pay a similar level for
a comparable site."
The Planning and Zoning Board recommendation is as follows:
"At its July 11 meeting, the Board considered the revised site
plan and voted unanimously to recommend its approval subject
to the following conditions:
1. In lieu of elevations, a note should be added to the site
plan specifically limiting height (two stories).
2. A screening fence should be indicated on the plan for
the south and west boundaries of the site.
3. The subdivision plat should indicate utility easements
as well as common access easements for parking lots and
common open space.
4. Open space maintenance guarantee and legal instrument
should be approved by City Attorney's Office.
The applicant has agreed to these conditions, and we anticipate
their being handled prior to the August 2 Council meeting. The
staff recommendation is for approval on this basis."
464
Planner II, Paul Deibel stated that all of the conditions
except number 4 have been met. '
Paul Lanspery stated that the residents of the area have
questioned staff regarding a park in the area.
Sandra Freeman, a property owner on Stanford Drive,__spoke_
to the number of small children in the area, and the distance
to Edora Park and to Boltz Jr. High for park facilities.
Mr. Tom Metcalf spoke to the events pertaining to a homeowner's
association, the school impact and the possible impact to
traffic.
Mr. R. Moore, the developer, spoke to the steps taken to
remedy the problems within the area and concessions made to
meet the planning and zoning requirements.
H.R. Phillips, Director of Parks and Recreation, spoke to
the need for a park in this area, the current parks and future
parks.
Mr. Ted Gatteau, representing the developers, spoke to trying
to provide the park area needed or requested by the residents
of the immediate vicinity and to all of the other requirements
provided as required for a P.U.D. development.
Councilman Bowling made a motion to table this item for two
weeks with instructions to the administration to investigate
the adjoining area and make a report back on that area and
what can be done, if anything, and an answer to the park
problem. Councilwoman Gray seconded the motion. Yeas:
Councilmembers Bowling, Gray, Russell, St. Croix, Suinn and
Wilkinson. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
Foothills Square P.U.D. Preliminary Plan Approved
Following is the City Manager's memo regarding this:
"This is a proposal for a retail shopping center on 13 acres
zoned H-B, Highway Business District, located at the northeast
corner of South College Avenue and Horsetooth Road. The main
entrance driveway to the center will be off Horsetooth Road
and located far enough to avoid conflicts with the intersection
of South College Avenue and Horsetooth.
The major issue that has arisen in the proposal involves side- '
walks and pedestrian access. Staff recommended that sidewalks
should be included along all four streets bordering the site.
465
The developer has agreed that the question of pedestrian
' circulation through the site should receive closer analysis.
The Planning and Zoning Board voted 6 to 1 to recommend
approval of the plan subject to settlement of the sidewalk
question between developer and staff.
To date the applicant has submitted a revised site plan
which provides adequate pedestrian facilities on three of
the four bordering streets."
Following is the Planning Staff's comments as set out in a
memo dated July 28, 1977:
"The applicant has submitted a revised site plan which provides
adequate facilities along S. College, Lemay, and the north -south
street at the east end of the site.
Thus the only question that remains concerns sidewalk along the
south side of Monroe.
Concerning sidewalks in general: the staff feels that side-
walks are an essential requirement for all urban development.
The city properly requires sidewalks for low density residen-
tial streets, and should certainly require them in areas of
major pedestrian activity such as shopping areas. Moreover,
provision of sidewalks is not "negotiable" in standard sub-
divisions, and should not be considered as such for P.U.D.'s.
Concerning sidewalk along Monroe:
A sidewalk along Monroe is necessary so as to provide a well
defined public pedestrian access from the east to the planned
pedestrian crossing of S. College at Monroe. Monroe is the
best location for this crossi.zf because signalization of this
intersection can be sequenced in conjunction with the signals
at College and Horsetooth and at.College and Foothills Parkway
to allow enough time for pedestrians to cross safely without
disrupting traffic flows. Neither of the latter intersections
will allow this. Not all pedestrians will cross at this
location, but a safe signalized crossing should nevertheless
be made available and accessible with sidewalks, including one
along Monroe.
The staff recommendation is for approval of the preliminary
plan but with sidewalk along Monroe Drive.
Last minute postscript (29 July 1977)
We have had additional discussion with the applicant who has
indicated his agreement to installation of sidewalk along the
south side of Monroe.
466
Paul Deibel, Planner II, stated that the problems of pedestrian
access and circulation have been solved.
Councilman Wilkinson questioned the need .for a pedestrian I
sidewalk on College Avenue.
Councilman St. Croix also questioned the sidewalk on College
Avenue.
Councilman Russell asked about the 10% parking variance.
Councilwoman Gray stated she was in agreement to having a
sidewalk in this area on College Avenue.
Councilman Bowling stated he thought this was a good plan.
Councilman Suinn stated he agreed with the requirement for the
sidewalk on College Avenue.
Councilwoman Gray made a motion, seconded by Councilman Bowling
to approve the preliminary plan of Foothills Square P.U.D.
Yeas: Councilmembers Bowling„ Gray, Russell, St. Croix and
Suinn. Nays: Councilman Wilkinson.
THE MOTION CARRIED
Amendment of Foothills Plaza North P.U.D. I
Preliminary Plan Approved
The background and•Planning and Zoning Board recommendation on
this item follows:
"Background
In June, the Council gave preliminary approval to an extension of
this P.U.D. to the north to include a tract for an office building.
This current proposal, however, is a relatively minor change to
the approved site plan for development at the south end of the
site.
Specifically, the proposal is to join what are now two separate
building envelopes on either side of the Larimer County No. 2
canal into a single envelope including area over the canal.
The plan is still to develop two buildings, but to connect them
with a pedestrian deck spanning the canal.
Planning and Zoning Board Recommendation: Conditional Approval
At its July 11 meeting, the Board voted unanimously to recommend
approval of the preliminary plan subject to the following '
comments as suggested by the staff:
467
1. The interior pedestrian circulation system should
' connect with signalized pedestrian crossing of '
S. College at Monroe, and public sidewalks to the
south.
2. Five or so proposed parking spaces closest to the
corner at S. College_a_nd Monroe should be eliminated
in place of prominent landscape treatment of corner
as per currently approved plan. Parking ratio is
high enough to warrant this.
The developer has agreed to these suggestions. The staff
recommends approval on this basis."
Councilman St. Croix made a motion, seconded by Councilman
Russell to approve the amendment of the Foothills Plaza North
P.U.D. preliminary plan. Yeas: Councilmembers Bowling, Gray,
Russell, St. Croix, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
Amendment of Lot 1, Harvard P.U.D. First Filing
Conditionally Ap
proved...
' The background and the Planning and Zoning Board recommendations
are as follows:
"Background
This is a proposal for a one-story retail building at the corner
of Harvard and the S. College Ave. frontage road. This would
be in lieu of the gas station shown for this lot on the currently
approved 1972 site plan. The proposed site plan includes the
following statement of planning objectives:
"Proposed development is for a one story building to be
used as a leasable retail space, accommodating two tenants.
Building characteristics include large windows both street
sides to allow maximum visibility of merchandise. The
entry area achieves added interest through the use of
extensive landscaping, a graphically bold building sign,
and a covered canopy.seating area which may be used for
display space. This development provides good vehicular
and pedestrian circulation with the existing Harvard
development, and facilitates an interrelationship -between
the proposed building and the unit development to the
North."
468
1
Planning and Zoning Board Recommendation: Conditional Approval
At its July 11, meeting, the Board voted unanimously to recommend I
approval subject to the following conditions:
1. Building should be shifted away from the north property
line so as not to conflict with proposed landscape
treatment as approved for the S. College Commercial
P.U.D. bounding this site to the north.
2. Submittal of final landscape plan.
The applicant has revised the building location as per the first
comment above. Final landscape plans have just been submitted
as of this writing, and have not been fully reviewed by city
staff. We are nevertheless placing this item on the August 2
Council agenda at the applicant's request, and we expect to
have reviewed the landscape plan prior to the Council meeting.
Staff recommendation is for approval subject to landscape plan
review."
Planner II, Paul Deibel, stated there had been a meeting with
the developer and the landscape architects and the landscape
plan will be filed soon. The Planning staff is requesting that
they be allowed to administratively approve the landscape plan
along with the landscape letter of approval. '
Mr. Moe Mekelburg, the applicant, stated that the landscape plan
will meet all the requirements.
Councilman Bowling made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Gray
to approve the amendment of Lot 1, Harvard P.U.D., First Filing,
subject to receiving the landscape plan and the letter of credit.
Yeas: Councilmembers Bowling, Gray, Russell, St. Croix, Suinn
and Wilkinson. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
Riverside Commercial P.U.D.
Preliminary Plan Approved
Councilman Wilkinson withdrew from the discussion and voting on
this item due to a possible conflict of interest.
The Planning and Zoning Board background, recommendation and
staff comments are as follows:
"Background
This is a proposal for a mix of commercial uses (as per the B-P '
469
zone) to be planned and reviewed as a P.U.D. but with
' development to occur on six individual lots in separate
ownerships. The plan combines larger retail buldings along
Riverside (Buildings C and D on attached site plan) with
smaller professional office buildings to the west (Buildings
A, B, E, F, G). Please see the attached statement of planning
objectives submitted by the architect which discusses in
detail the specifics of the proposal.
1
1
Planning and Zoning Board Recommendation: Conditional Approval
The Board discussed this proposal at its July 11 meeting.
Staff comments were that the proposal appeared to have more the
characteristics of a subdivision than a P.U.D. due to the
constraints set by the parcelling of lots around a dedicated
cul-de-sac. The staff did not feel that this was undesirable
per -se, but that the specific layout of parkine and driveways
was overly constrained in some places by lot lines and the
location of the interior dedicated public street. A more
serious problem appeared to be a significant shortage of parking
which would lend itself to shared parking among uses as is nor-
mally the case, in a P.U.D. The staff made specific suggestions
as to how these problems could be addressed. The staff recom-
mendation to the Board, however, was that the item be tabled
so as to allow revision of the internal circulation and parking
layout.
The developer and the architect of the project responded at
the meeting, to the concerns expressed by the staff and the
Board and discussed some specific revisions to be made in
response to these concerns including changing the dedicated
cul-de-sac to a private drive. The developer asked that the
matter not be tabled, however.
The Board felt that the staff discussion and the developer's
response were specific enough so that the proposal need not be
tabled. The Board voted unanimously (with two abstentions) to
recommend approval of the preliminary with the following
conditions:
1) that adequate parking for "Building C" be provided on
Lot 1;
2) that the plat and/or deed restrictions clearly indicate
that parking will be common (i.e. shared among lots);
3) that the interior drive and landscape treatment be used
to define and separate medical and retail uses.
470
Staff Comment '
The applicant has submitted a revised preliminary plan that
responds to the major concerns discussed by the staff and the
Planning and Zoning Board. Adequate parking for the large retail
building (Bldg. C, lot 1) has been provided and interior parking
circulation has been improved with driveway connections among
lots. A pedestrian link with the Elizabeth Medical P.U.D. to
the south has also been added. The basic layout still entails
a central cul-de-sac drive, although the entrance to this drive
will be a standard driveway curbcut entrance (i.e. concrete
apron, not curbed radii). The staff feels that this drive
should not be, or even look like, a public street so as to
better define this development as a planned unit and thereby
bolster the viability over time of the shared parking and
coordinated architectural and landscape treatment that
characterize the proposal.
The staff recommendation is for approval on this basis."
Councilwoman Gray made a motion, seconded by Councilman Bowling
to approve the preliminary plan for the Riverside Commercial
P.U.D. Yeas: Councilmembers Bowling, Gray, Russell, St. Croix
and Suinn. Nays: None. (Councilman Wilkinson out of room.)
THE MOTION CARRIED '
Other Business
A. Assistant Mayor Suinn stated that Council needed an
executive session on August 3, 1977 to discuss personnel
matters. Councilman Bowling made a motion, seconded by
Councilman St. Croix to call an executive session for the
purpose of discussing personnel matters. Yeas: Council -
members Bowling, Gray, Russell, St. Croix and Suinn. Nays:
None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
B. Bob Ferluga, Director of the Downtown
spoke to the change orders necessary
ment district as listed below:
471
Redevelopment office
in the special improve-
CHANGE ORDERS FOR THE DMT1C7WN PFP
August 2, 1977
' ACE TILE & TERRAZZO (BRICK PAVING) 9.LOVELAND TURF SPRINKLER (IRRIGATION)
Original Bid $90,872 Original Bid $ 19,800
Modification of Anticipated Change Order
installation 1,000 estimated to be $3,000-$4,000
New Contract Amt. $91,872
2. BATH, INC. (PLANTING)
Original Bid'. $47,000
3. BARGELT (MECHANICAL WORK)
Original Bid $58,455
Change Order #1 (Still under
discussion) 455
4. BURCH ELECTRIC (ELECTRIC WORK)
Original Bid $31,107.
�DELOZIER CONSTRUCTION (CANOPIES)
Original Bid $ 219,615
Change Order #1 20,669
New Contract Amt.$ 240,234
10. MAYCROFT I4ASONRY (VAULT PALLS)
Original Bid was in Unit Prices.
We used Architect's estimate for
maximum, but felt we would overrun it.
Estimated Cost $ 825.00
Additional Payment 325.78
Actual Contract Amt. $ 1,150.78
11. MORGAN CONSTRUCTORS (TREE HOLES,FRAMES)
Original Bid $ 10,000.00
Change Order #1 319.67
L
New Contract Amount $ 10,319.67
12. NEENAH FOUNDRY (TREE GRATES)
Original Bid $ 17,667.00
13.
WESTERN STATES
CONCRETE
(DEMOLITION)
6. FLATIRON PAVING
(ASPHALT)
Original Bid
$ 58,278.60
Original Bid
was in unit
Change Order
#1
1,625.92
prices. We set a ceiling
Change Order
#2
2,757.90
of
$ 7,590
Change Order
#3
2,000.81
New Contract
Amt.
$ 64,663.23
7. GREEN SPOT, INC.
(TREES)
Original Bid
$ 2,160
14.
WESTERN STATES
CONCRETE
(CONCRETE WORK)
Change Order
#1 540
Original Bid
$143,021.54
New Contract
Amt. $ 2,700
Change Order
#1
1,3410.80
Change Order
#2
1,526.40
8. KROH, INC. (TREES)
New Contract
Amt.
$145,888.74
Original Bid,
'
Trees I
$ 13,972
Original Bid,
15.CARPENTRY
Trees II
6,552
Change Order
#1 (I) 471
Architect's Estimate
$ 17,600.00
Change Order
#1 (II) 174
Sole Bid Price
36,000.00
New Contract
Amt. $ 21,169
(DeLozier)
472
*General Improv�m�nt.
District Funds
16. WORK BY CITY CREWS '
Total to Date $ 177,900.89
Originally Budgeted 175,305.00
Overrun $ 2,595.89
SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
SUMMARY OF CHANGE ORDERS
1. Ace Tile Modification $ 1,000.00
7. Green Spot Change Order #1 540.00
8. Kroh Change Order #l(Trees I) 471.00
8. Kroh Change Order #l(Trees II) 174.00
10. Maycroft Overrun 325.78
11. Morgan Change Order #1 319.67
13. Western States Demo. C.O.#1 1,625.92
C.O.#2 2,757.90 '
" C.O.#3 2,000.81
14. Western States Conc. C.O. #1 1,340.80
C.O. #2 1,526.40
Subtotal $ 12,082.28
16. City Crews Overrun 2,595.89
Subtotal $ 14,678.17
Anticipated:
Bargelt C.O. #1 455.00
Loveland Turf 4,000.00
TOTAL $ 19,133.17
473
Councilman Bowling made a motion to approve the change
orders as presented. The motion was seconded by Councilman
' St. Croix. Yeas: Councilmembers Bowling, Gray, Russell,
St. Croix, Suinn and Wilkinson. Nays: None.
1
1
THE MOTION CARRIED
C. City Attorney Art March stated that Council needed to call
an executive session to discuss strategy with the City
Attorney. Councilman Wilkinson made a motion to call an
executive session after the General Improvement District
Board meeting, seconded by Councilman St. Croix. Yeas:
Councilmembers Bowling, Gray, Russell, St. Croix, Suinn
and Wilkinson. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED
The Assistant Mayor adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m.
ATTEST:
Deputy ty Glerk
474