HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES-02/05/1985-RegularI
February 5, 1985
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
Council -Manager Form of Government
Regular Meeting - 6:30 p.m.
A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins was held on
Tuesday, February 5, 1985, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the
City of Fort Collins City Hall. Roll call was answered by the following
Councilmembers: Clarke, Elliott, Horak, Knezovich, Ohlson, Rutstein, and
Stoner.
-Staff Members Present: Arnold, Huisjen, Krajicek, Lewis, Shannon
Agenda Review: City Manager
Councilmember Stoner asked that Item #20, Hearing and First Reading of
Ordinance No. 13, 1985, Adopting "Colorado Model Energy Efficiency Con-
struction Standards for Non -Residential Buildings", be removed from the
Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Knezovich asked that Item #22, Hearing and First Reading of
Ordinance No. 15, 1985, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the General
Fund and Unanticipated Revenue in the Light and Power Fund, be withdrawn
from the Consent Agenda.
Mayor Horak requested Item #23, Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No.
16, 1985, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves and Anticipated Revenues in the
Conservation Trust Fund and Authorizing the Transfer of Appropriations
Between Projects, be removed from the Consent Agenda.
Consent Calenda
This Calendar is intended to allow the City Council to spend its time and
energy on the important items on a lengthy agenda. Staff recommends
approval of the Consent Calendar. Anyone may request an item on this
calendar be "pulled" off the Consent Calendar and considered separately.
Agenda items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be considered separately
under Agenda Item #39, Pulled Consent Items', except items pulled by anyone
in the audience or items that any member of the audience is present to
discuss that were pulled by staff or Council. These items will be dis-
cussed immediately following the Consent Calendar.
4. Minutes of the regular meeting of January 15.
-56-
February 5, 1985 '
5. Tabling of the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 152, 1984, Relating to
the Inclusion of lands within the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy
On November 20 this Ordinance was tabled to this date to allow the
Water Board to consider the matter since the inclusion of these lands
in the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District might result in
additional assessments or taxation.
The Water Board considered the matter and requested additional infor-
mation from the District pertaining to this subject. The District's
Attorney, John Sayre, had agreed to forward a letter to the City
responding to the concerns of the Water Board and Councilmember
Rutstein but this letter was not received by the City until January
28, 1985. Accordingly, the Water Board will, if its agenda permits,
consider the issue at its February meeting and will subsequently make
a recommendation to Council. Since it is not certain that such a
recommendation will be forthcoming at the Water Board's February
meeting, it is recommended that the Council table the Ordinance
indefinitely.
The District has not put any great pressure upon the City to move
forward with this matter and until the Council receives the informa-
tion upon which it can make a reasoned decision, there is not need to
present the matter for second reading.
6. Tabli
proxi
of the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 194. 1984, Annexin
re
an rirst Annexation.
This ordinance was unanimously adopted on First Reading on December
18. The applicants, Don and Rosemary Sheridan, are requesting annex-
ation of approximately 2.96 acres (Lot 10, Block 4 of the Lynn Acres
Subdivision) located on Lynn Drive. The annexation is a 100% volun-
tary annexation in that the applicants are the sole owners of the
property. This annexation achieves its one -sixth contiguity require-
ments through a common boundary with the Village Grove Annexation.
The final documents necessary to complete this annexation and zoning
process have not been received. Staff is requesting this item be
tabled to February 19.
7. Tabling of the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 195, 1984, Zoning
Approximately 2.96 Acres, Known as the Sheridan First Annexation into
the R-E, Residential Estate, Zonino District.
This ordinance was unanimously adopted on First Reading on December
18. The applicants, Don and Rosemary Sheridan, are requesting zoning
-57-
' February 5, 1985
on approximately 2.96 acres (Lot 10, Block 4 of Lynn Acres Subdivi-
sion) :known as the Sheridan First Annexation into the R-E, Residential
Estate, zoning district.
The final documents necessary to complete this annexation and zoning
process have not been received. Staff is requesting this item he
tabled to February 19.
8. Ordinances Relating to the Salaries of the City Attorney, City Man-
aqer, and Municipal Judqe.
A. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 210, 1984, Fixing the Salary of
the City Attorney.
B. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 211, 1984, Fixing the Salary of
the City Manager.
C. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 212, 1984, Fixing the Salary of
the Municipal Judge.
City Council has met in Executive Session to perform the annual
evaluations of the City Attorney, City Manager, and Municipal Judge.
These three ordinances will establish the 1985 salaries for these
' three individuals. At the January 15 meeting Council set the salary
of the City Attorney at $49,000, the City Manager at $71,500, and the
Municipal Judge at $46,100.
9. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1, 1985, Annexing Approximately 16.25
Acres Known as Springbrook Two Annexation.
This ordinance was unanimously adopted on First Reading on January
15. The applicant, Charles Burchfield, is requesting annexation of
approximately 16.25 acres located on the northeast corner of Taft Hill
Road and Hull Street, south of Drake Road. The request is a 100%
voluntary annexation. Both property owners are in agreement with the
request. The annexation achieves its one -sixth contiguity requirement
via common boundaries with Springbrook Annexation.
10. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2, 1985, Zoning Approximately 16.25
Acres, Known as Springbrook Two nne to ix on into the R-P, Planned
Residential, Zoning District.
This ordinance was unanimously adopted on First Reading on January
15. The applicant, Charles Burchfield, is requesting zoning on behalf
of the property owners for approximately 16.25 acres known as Spring -
brook Two Annexation. Inclusion, into the•R-P, Planned Residential,
zoning district is requested.
MM
February 5, 1985 '
Staff has reviewed the requested R-P zoning and feels that it is in
conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
11. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 3, 1985, Changing Zoning Conditions on
Property Known as Scenic Views PUD.
This ordinance was unanimously adopted on First Reading on January
15. The City has initiated this request with the approval of Blair
Kiefer, the property owner. It has been the policy of the Planning
Department to initiate requests of this nature, where conditions
imposed prior to adoption of the Land Development Guidance System are
no longer valid.
The 22.805 acre site was originally zoned R-L, Low Density Residen-
tial. A zone change to Conditional R-P was approved by the Planning
and Zoning Board on March 24, 1980 and by City Council on April 29,'
1980. The conditions attached to the rezoning are:
1. That the property be developed to no greater density than 8.5
dwelling units per acre as the term "dwelling unit" is defined in
the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Fort Collins;
2. That the property be developed as a Planned Unit Development as '
the term "P.U.D." is defined in the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Fort Collins;
3. That the 40 square foot per dwelling unit commercial allotment
permitted in Planned Unit Developments not be utilized.
Removal of conditions No. 1 and No. 3 is recommended.
Removal of the condition limiting density to 8.5 du/acre will allow
development consistent with the Land Development Guidance System.
12. Items Relating to Requirements for Naming all New Arterial and Col-
lector Streets.
A. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 4, 1985, Setting Requirements for
Naming all New Arterial and Collector Streets.
B. Resolution Adopting the List of Street Names to be Used in Naming
New Arterial and Collector Streets.
This Ordinance was unanimously adopted on First Reading on January
15. Development this year has been occurring away from the center of
the City where arterials and future collectors are currently unnamed
-59-
February 5, 1985
or have only County Road number designation. Staff feels that the
City should be instrumental in naming such soon -to -be -important
streets and, as a result, set up requirements for naming such streets.
The Ordinance specifies that a list of names of prominent citizens who
the City would like to honor posthumously will be approved by Council
Resolution. A list was compiled with the help of Charlene Tresner,
Local History Coordinator of the Fort Collins Public Library, and Mary
Katsimpalis of Colorado State University, as well as numerous long-
time City employees. The resolution approving the list of street names
is also presented for Council consideration.
13. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 5, 1985, Being an Ordinance Appro-
priating Unanticipated Revenue in t e onservation Trust Fund.
The Corridor Task Force identified the need to obtain a professional
cost estimate of properties in,the-corridor area in order to properly
evaluate alternative strategies for maintaining the corridor as open
space. Following an RFP process, the firm of Bowes and Company in
Denver was selected by the Task Force to develop the preliminary
appraisal for a cost not to exceed $15,000. It was agreed by the Task
Force members that the cost of the appraisal would be shared equally
by Fort Collins, Loveland and Larimer County.
Both Loveland and Larimer County have prepared and signed agreements
that they will pay to Fort Collins $5,000 or one-third of the ap-
praisal cost on or before January 15, 1985. Resolutions adopted on
January 15 authorized the Mayor to sign those agreements. This
ordinance was unanimously adopted on First Reading on January 15 and
appropriates these unanticipated revenues.
14. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 6, 1985, Amending Section 99-6 of the
Code of the City of Fort Collins Regarding Improvements to Offsite
Streets.
On January 15 Council approved a Resolution adopting an Offsite
Improvement Policy.
Since Council passed the Offsite Street Ordinance on November 3, 1981,
there has been much confusion on the part of Developers concerning
their responsibilities regarding the Ordinance. Staff developed a
policy and presented it to the Planning and Zoning Board at their
October 22nd meeting. The procedure has been used in reviewing one
variance request and all parties involved agreed that it was compre-
hensive in viewing all City concerns and fair to all parties.
The Offsite Street Ordinance itself needs to be clarified in regard to
the extent of the offsite street improvements required. Staff has
proposed this ordinance, which was unanimously adopted on First
Reading on January 15, to accomplish this.
1 -60-
February 5, 1985
15. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 7, 1985, Authorizing the Transfer of
Appropriated Amounts from the General Fund to the Capital Projects
Fund for Additional Renovation Work at the Library.
This Ordinance was unanimously adopted on First Reading on January
15. The renovation of the Library was funded at $103,000 through the
additional one -quarter cent sales tax program. During the preliminary
design phase, additional items were identified which, should be com-
pleted during this renovation. These additional items are:
1) first floor lighting upgrade;
2) balance HVAC first floor;
3) additional exhaust second floor;
4) growth of original electrical estimate;
5) growth of original general construction estimate; and
6) additional case work.
16. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 8, 1985, Appropriating Prior Year
Reserves in the SAVE Fund and Authorizing the Payment of Unexpended
Appropriations in the SAVE Fund to the REACH Program.
From 1980 through 1982, the City, through a series of grants, was able
to conduct a project to Save America's Vital Energy (SAVE).
Since 1982, SAVE has been unable to obtain additional grant funds, and ,
the project has been discontinued. During the same time, additional
interest has been earned, leaving the fund with a balance of $9,173.04
at the end of 1984.
Staff feels that, because the service provided by REACH is the same as
SAVE's during its existence, giving the unspent funds of $9,173.04 to
the REACH program would be appropriate at this time. This amount would
finance the weatherization of 70 additional homes at the current
average cost of $130 per home.
Of the $9,173.04 available in the SAVE Fund, only $3,535.04 has
previously been appropriated. This ordinance was unanimously adopted
on First Reading on January 15 and appropriates the other $5,638.00
from prior year reserves in the Fund, and authorizes the total to be
paid to the REACH program.
17. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 9, 1985, Appropriating Unanticipated
Revenue of 3,000 in the Transportation Fund for the SAINT Program.
SAINT, a volunteer transportation service matching seniors (60+) in
need of transportation with volunteer drivers, has received a $3,000
grant from the Gannett Foundation for program operations. This
-61-
' February 5, 1985
ordinance was unanimously adopted on First Reading on January 15 and
appropriates the $3,000 of unanticipated grant revenue in the Trans-
portation Fund for the SAINT program.
18. Second Reading,of Ordinance No..10, 1985, Amending Chapter 16 of the
Code of the City of Fort Collins.
The City Code provides, in Section 16-6, that the Council must, with
regard to the creation of Special Improvement Districts, publish
notice indicating the kind of improvements, the manner of assessment,
interest rates, boundaries, total probable cost and the time of
hearing for the consideration of the creation of the District. Pres-
ently the Code provides that the hearing for the consideration of the
establishment of the District must be held not less than thirty (30)
days after the first publication nor more than -sixty (60) days there-
after. It is the opinion of the City Attorney's Office that reason-
able due process would not be denied to an interested person if the
time period between first publication and hearing were shortened to
twenty (20) days. Accordingly, this ordinance, which was unanimously
adopted on First Reading on January 15, amends Section 16 to shorten,
the time from thirty (30) days to twenty (20) days.
19. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 11, 1985, Changing the Open Market
Purchases by Other Departments from 1210 to 1111.
This Ordinance was unanimously adopted on First Reading on January
15. In 1984 a Purchasing System Review was performed by Main Hurdman.
Among the recommendations made to improve the efficiency of the City's
purchasing operation is the raising of the mini order limit from $200
(set by Ordinance in 1979) to $500. This is the amount of open market
purchases which may be made by departments without going through the
Purchasing Division. A $500 limit will provide greater flexibility
for users, while not materially increasing exposure to the City.
20. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 13, 1985, Adopting "Colo-
rado Model Energy Efficiency Construction Standards for Non -Residen-
tial Buildings .
The City of Fort Collins presently has no energy conservation stan-
dards that apply to commercial construction. Upon direction from
Council, staff has compared the Colorado Model Energy Efficiency
Construction and Renovation Standards for Non -Residential Buildings
with our current residential requirements. The state model document
for new commercial construction is somewhat less restrictive than our
residential energy code in the specific provisions for exterior
envelope insulation. But the State code goes beyond thermal envelope
performance and includes all of the building's energy -consuming
equipment as well.
1 -62-
February 5, 1985
Staff has proposed adopting the complete non-residential package '
contained in the State model document (with minor changes). It is felt
that the time has come for Fort Collins to formalize its total energy
policy strategy and adopt the State standard into a local code, rather
than to rely on voluntary compliance. Voluntary compliance has proven
much l.ess.effective with commercial buil.dings thanresidentialbecause
energy concerns and costs can typically be passed on to the tenants.
21. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 14, 1985, Amending Section
114-2 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins Relating to the "Model
Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities", 1977 Edition.
This Ordinance includes two changes to the Model Traffic Code as
adopted and amended by the City. The changes relate to parking
regulation and enforcement and are intended to take care of problems
which have developed in that area.
First, Section 12-2 regarding obedience to stopping, standing or
parking regulations has been amended to require obedience to markings'
such as lines, words and symbols painted on the road surface as well
as official signs posted to give notice of stopping, standing or
parking restrictions or prohibitions.
Second, Section 22-20 relating to the authority to impound vehicles
has been amended to add a new subsection (c) to make it unlawful for
any person to abandon a vehicle on any public right-of-way or on '
property other than his own without the consent of the owner or lessee
of the property.
22. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 15, 1985, Appropriating
Prior Year Reserves in theGeneral Fund and Unanticipated Revenue in
the Lioht and Power Fund.
On October 20, 1984, the City began a more concentrated cable TV
support program by creating the full-time position of "Cable Support
staff person". Among the services provided by this position are
support for the Public Access Advisory Board, support for the Cable
Advisory Board, liaison with Columbine CableVision and departmental
support in the areas of cable use and technology and programming to be
aired over the municipal channel.
Funding for this position will be provided by the General Fund and the
Light and Power Fund. The estimated direct cost of $25,000 will be
appropriated from the General Fund's reserves. This amount is approx-
imately equal to the Use Taxes paid to the City by Columbine Cable -
Vision in 1984. At the end of 1984, these funds lapsed into General
Fund reserves. The costs associated with management support and
facilities for this position are being provided by the Light and Power
Utility through their existing budget.
-63- 1
I
February 5, 1985
This ordinance appropriates the $25,000 from prior year reserves in
the General Fund for transfer to the Light and Power Fund, and appro-
priates this unanticipated revenue in the Light and Power Fund for
expenditure.
23. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 16, 1985, Appropriating
Prior Year Reserves and Anticipated Revenues in the Conservation Trust
Fund and Authorizing the Transfer of Appropriations Between Projects.
The purpose of this ordinance is to appropriate available lottery
money in the Conservation Trust Fund in order to establish a revised
1985 budget for the Conservation Trust Fund.
When the 1985 budget was adopted by Council, only a small portion
($50,000) of the available resources from the Conservation Trust Fund
(Lottery funds) was appropriated. It was felt that the Council Open
Space Subcommittee would probably be making specific recommendations
for funds, which have been received, and would make additional recom-
mendations based upon actual resources available in the Conservation
Trust Fund once those revenues were officially known. This ordinance
appropriates $430,000 for expenditure in the Conservation Trust
' Fund.
24. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 17, 1985, Appropriating
Unanticipated Revenue of $6,500 in the Transportation Fund for the
SAINT Program.
SAINT, a volunteer transportation service matching seniors (60+) in
need of transportation with volunteer drivers, has received a $6,500
grant from the Larimer County Human Resource Committee for program
operations. This ordinance appropriates the $6,500 of unanticipated
grant revenue in the Transportation Fund for the SAINT program.
25. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 18, 1985, Appropriating
Unanticipated Grant Revenue of $1,440 in the Cultural Services and
Facilities Fund for the Museum.
The Fort Collins Museum applied for and was awarded, on December 3,
1984, a $1,440 Local Assistance grant by the Colorado Historical
Society. The Local Assistance Program is funded annually by appro-
priation of the Colorado General Assembly to provide technical and
financial assistance to local historical societies and museums
throughout Colorado.
The grant funds will enable the Museum to hire a temporary, part time
employee to help inventory the Museum's collection of historical
-64-
February 5, 1985
items. The period of employment will be from January 7 through April
26, 1985. The inventory will provide an accountability of the Muse- '
um's items on record, and lead to the development of a location file,
which will simplify retrieval of an individual item from among the
20,000 in the collection.
26. _I.tems Relating to Riverside Shopping Center Subdivision Filing Two.
A. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 19, 1985, Vacating
Two Utility and Access Easements and a Portion of the Emigh Ditch
Easement in Riverside Shopping Center Filing II.
B. Acceptance of Replacement Easements and Additional Right -of -Way
for Pennock Place.
Riverside Shopping Center Subdivision, Filing Two, was approved by the
Planning and Zoning Board on July 23, 1984. At that time the devel-
oper (Osprey, Inc.) had not prepared a final site plan for the center.
(Since this is a straight subdivision and not a P.U.D., the developer
is not required to submit a site plan for approval, except as required
for a building permit.) The developer has currently developed a site
plan and many of the easements, as platted, interfere with his new
plan. As a result, the developer is requesting that the City vacate
some of the platted easements to accomodate his current site plan and
accept the replacement easements and additional right-of-way. All
utilities have been notified of the request and have indicated no
problems. '
27. Items Relating to Vacation of Easement in Brown Farm Third Filing.
A. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 20, 1985, Vacating a
Portion of a Drainage Easement in Tract B, Brown Farm Third
Filing.
B. Acceptance of Dedication of Easement for Detention.
The Developer of Drake Crossing Auto Center, a P.U.D. (Fort Collins
Car Wash Partnership), is requesting the vacation of a portion of an
existing drainage easement to accommodate an island for gas pumps.
The developer has dedicated', as part of their P.U.D., an additional
easement to accommodate the detention lost by this vacation. All'the
utilities have been notified of this vacation request and have indi-
cated no problems with it.
28. Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into an Agreement
with Larimer County for the Provision of Certain Parking Spaces on
Mountain Avenue and on Chestnut Street.
Larimer County operates office space on the corner of Riverside Avenue
and Chestnut Street. The parking for employees of this office is
-65-
' February 5, 1985
limited. In an effort to mitigate the parking problem in the Old Town
area, Larimer County and the City of Fort Collins entered into an
Intergovernmental agreement on August 18, 1981, whereby Larimer County
purchased 35 permit parking spaces on East Mountain Avenue in the
The 1985 contract, which will be effective from January 1, 1985,
through December 31, 1985, provides a $7/space/month rate. Regular
parking permits are $8/space/month. Larimer County has been given a
lower rate because of the quantity purchased, the once -a -year proces-
sing of these permits, and the using of their own stickers for the
permits. This greatly reduces handling and paperwork. In 1985 new
parking programs and fees will be implemented. We prefer to postpone
a rate increase for the County lease until the particular program and
fee schedule are determined. The Parking Commission met on December
7, 1984, and recommended approval of this agreement.
29. Motion to Accept with Conditions the Deed for the Property Located at
309 South Sherwood.
Sometime in 1983, Mrs. Grace Quinby approached the City about donating
her property at 309 South Sherwood to be developed as a mini -park for
Senior Citizens. The City staff gave her a favorable response and so
she placed a proviso in her trust for donation of the property to the
City upon her death, together with the sum of $1,000 for development
' of a park which is to be attractive and useful to elderly persons in
the City.
Mrs. Quinby recently died and now the City must decide if we do indeed
want to accept the property and develop it as a Senior Citizen Park.
A neighborhood meeting was held and there was no opposition to the
park. Staff recommends accepting the property as a gift to eventually
be developed into a Senior Citizen Park. The Parks and Recreation
Board has reviewed the plans as well and also recommends acceptance of
the property.
30. Routine Deeds and Easements.
The following are routine easements which have been reviewed and
approved by the Light and Power Utility, Public Service Company and
the legal staff. The two easements will be used for the construction
of an underground electrical duct bank and will also be utilized by
Public Service Company and Platte River Power Authority for construc-
tion of utility services to the Anheuser-Busch site. The easements
parallel the northwest right-of-way between the Larimer-Weld Canal and
the property owned by Anheuser-Busch. Consideration for each easement
is $0.125 per square foot. Approximately two-thirds of this cost will
be reimbursed by Public Service Company.
February 5, 1985
a. Easement dedication from Deborah H. Pool, Diane Woollett and
Denzel F. Hartshorn, for underground utilities. Consideration is
$4,290.41.
b. Easement dedication from Deborah H. Pool, Diane Woollett and
Denzel F. Hartshorn for overhead and underground utilities.
Consideration is $762.30.
In addition, an option for a water line easement has been negotiated
across the property owned by Pool, Woollett and Hartshorn within an
existing Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) transmission line
right of way. The exact location within this corridor will be deter-
mined by Taranto, Stanton and Tagge, designers of the water line.
WAPA has given preliminary approval for the encroachment. Cost of the
option is $100. Upon exercise of the option, consideration for the
easement will be $1550 or 10% of fee.
Ordinances on Second Reading were read by title by Wanda Krajicek, City
Clerk.
Item #5. Tabling of the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 152, 1984, Re-
lating to the Inclusion of lands within the Northern Colorado
Water Conservancy District.
Item #6. Tabling of the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 194, 1984, Annex-
ing Approximately 2.96 Acres Known As the Sheridan First Annexa-
tion.
Item #7. Tabling of the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 195, 1984, Zoning
Approximately 2.96 Acres, Known as the Sheridan First Annexation
into the R-E, Residential Estate, Zoning District.
Item #8. A. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 210, 1984, Fixing the Salary
of the City Attorney.
B. Second Reading of Ordinancel No. 211, 1984, Fixing the Sala
of the City Manager.
C. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 212, 1984, Fixing the Salary
of the Municipal Judqe.
Item #9. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1, 1985, Annexing Approximatel
16.25 Acres Known as Springbrook Two Annexation.
Item #10. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2, 1985, Zoning Approximatel
16.25 Acres, Known as Springbrook Two Annexation into the R-F
Planned Residentla , oninq istrict.
•-67-
1
IFebruary 5, 1985
Item #11. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 3, 1985, Changing Zoning Condi-
tions on Property Known as Scenic Views PUD.
Item #12. A. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 4, 1985, Setting Requirements
for Naming all New Arterial and Collector Streets.
Item #13. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 5, 1985, Being an Ordinance
Appropriatinq Unanticipated Revenue in the Conservation Trust
Item #14.
Second Reading of Ordinance No.
6, 1985, Amending Section 99-6 of
the Code of the City of Fort
Collins Regarding Improvements to
Offsite Streets.
Item #15.
Second Reading of Ordinance No.
7, 1985, Authorizing the Transfer
of Appropriated Amounts from
the General Fund to the Capital,
rojec s un or Additional
Renovation Work at the Library.
Item #16.
Second Reading of Ordinance No.
8, 1985, Appropriating Prior Year
Reserves in the SAVE Fund and
Authorizing the Payment of Unex-
pended_Appropriations in the
SAVE Fund to the REACH Program.
'
Item #17.
Second Reading of Ordinance No.
pated Revenue of $3,000 in the
9, 1985, Appropriating Unantici-
Transportation Fund for the SAINT
Program.
Item N18.
Second Reading of Ordinance No.
10, 1985, Amending Chapter 16 of
the Code of the City of Fort Collins.
Item #19. Second Reading _of Ordinance No. 11, 1984, Changing the Open
Market Purchases by Other Departments from $200 to $500.
Ordinances on First Reading were read by title by Wanda Krajicek, City
Clerk.
Item #20. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 13, 1985, Adopting
"Colorado Model Energy Efficiency Construction Standards for
Non -Residential Buildings".
Item #21. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 14, 1985, Amending
Section 114-2 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins Relating to
the "Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities', 1977
Edition.
Item #22. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 15, 1985, Appropri-
ating Prior Year Reserves in the General Fund and Unanticipated
evenue in the Liqht and Power Fund.
February 5, 1985
Item #23. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 16, 1985, Appropri-
ating Prior Year Reserves and Anticipated Revenues in the Conser-
vation Trust Fund and Authorizing the Transfer of Appropriations
Between Projects.
Item #24. Hearing and First'Reading of'Ordinance No. 17, 1985, Appropri-
ating Unanticipated Revenue of $6,500 in the Transportation Fund
for the SAINT Program.
Item #25. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 18, 1985, Appropri-
ating Unanticipated Grant Revenue of $1,440 in the Cultural
Services and Facilities Fund for the Museum.
Item #26. A. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 19, 1985, Vacating
Two Utility and Access Easements and a Portion of the Emigh
Ditch Easement in RiversideShopping Center Filing I
Item #27. A. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 20, 1985, Vacating,
a Portion of a Drainage Easement in Tract B, Brown Farm Third
Filing.
Councilmember Clarke made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Stoner, to
adopt and approve all items not removed from the Consent Calendar. Yeas:
Clarke, Elliott, Horak, Knezovich, Ohlson, Rutstein, and Stoner. Nays:
None. ,
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance Adopting "Colorado Model Energy
Efficiency Construction Standards for
Non -Residential Buildings", Adopted on First Reading
Following is the staff's memorandum on this item:
"The City of Fort Collins presently has no energy conservation standards
that apply to commercial construction. Upon direction from Council, staff
has compared the Colorado Model Energy Efficiency Construction and Renova-
tion Standards for Non -Residential Buildings with our current residential
requirements. The state model document for new commercial construction is
somewhat less restrictive than our residential energy code in the specific
provisions for exterior envelope insulation. But the State code goes
beyond thermal envelope performance and includes all of the building's
energy -consuming equipment as well.
A recent survey conducted by the Colorado Office of Energy Conservation
revealed that most all major Colorado cities now enforce 'the State stan-
dards. In fact, Denver and Boulder go considerably beyond the State
-69- 1
February 5, 1985
minimums
simply because they are considered just that.
The State has also
indicated
that there is currently underway an effort to
upwardly revise the
national
standards upon which the Colorado model is
based. A revised
national
code may be forthcoming in late 1985.
The CHOICE Advisory Committee originally recommended a non -regulatory
approach to the issue of commercial energy conservation, with emphasis on
educational methods such as pamphlets and seminars provided by the City.
Staff proposed that CHOICE review their recommendation and consider incor-
porating the State's commercial insulation standards as a basic code.
CHOICE now supports a code change of this nature, as the letter from
Chairman Ann Murray indicates.
Staff has proposed adopting the complete non-residential package contained
in -the State model document.(with minor .changes)...It .is felt that the time
has come for Fort Collins to formalize its total energy policy strategy and
adopt the State standard into a local code, rather than to rely on volun-
tary compliance. Voluntary compliance has proven much less effective with,
commercial buildings than residential because energy concerns and costs can
typically be passed on to the tenants.
The proposed energy conservation construction requirements could add an
estimated 1% to 5% to total construction costs. This initial expenditure,
could be recovered in energy cost savings in a fairly short time period.
' More importantly, long term energy consumption would be significantly
reduced in the community. Although there may be some grumbling in the
commercial building industry, significant opposition is not anticipated.
Such a code is generally accepted as being long overdue. Also, many
projects already are designed to meet the State regulations so adopting
non-residential energy standards may represent more a formality of process
than actual additional construction requirements.
The Non -Residential Energy Conservation Standards proposed for your con-
sideration are amended slightly from the State model in order to be more
compatible with our current building code.
Staff recommends adoption of the proposed Non -Residential Energy Conserva-
tion Standards. Appropriate updating of this ordinance would occur as an
ongoing effort with the involvement of CHOICE.
Other options available to Council would include:
1. Adopt nothing and continue as in the past with no real gauge on
the commercial energy conservation in our city;
2. Adopt something .less prescriptive than recognized standards; or
3. Hold off and see what may happen with revised national standards."
-70-
February 5, 1985 ,
Councilmember Elliott made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Ohlson, to
adopt Ordinance No. 13, 1985 on First Reading.
Councilmember Stoner asked when the revised national standards would be
coming out and asked for an explanation of the amendments from the State
model.
Community Development Director Curt Smith noted the revised standards would
be out during the next 12-24 months and would be incorporated into the
Building Code. He added the specifics of the amendments were detailed in
the ordinance and were highlighted in caps.
Dick Beardmore, 110 North College, A-E Design, asked if these standards had
been discussed with the design community, developers, and property owners.
Curt Smith replied they had been discussed over the past several years
through the CHOICE Committee.
Mr. Beardmore encouraged Council to table consideration of the item for two
weeks to allow more review by the development industry.
Bruce Lockhart, 2500 East Harmony Road, questioned the legality of the I
standards and did not feel it was necessary to mandate by ordinance how
much insulation should be installed in commercial buildings.
Councilmember Clarke pointed out that builders often are not the persons
who end up paying the utilities so they overlook the evergy saving measures
since it's less expensive to construct without them. He felt anything that
would prolong or extend the life of our natural resources was wise and
prudent and should be done regardless of current energy costs.
Chief Building Inspector Felix Lee responded to questions from Council and
noted the ordinance was similar to a residential energy code. He added it
was performance related based on the exterior envelope, the heating equip-
ment, etc. He noted it was somewhat less restrictive that the residential
code. He stated the standards had been around five years and have been
used state-wide so he had not felt it necessary to present it in detail to
the development community.
Councilmember Stoner felt part of the citizen input process might have been
eliminated prior to Council consideration.
Councilmember Stoner made a motion to table Ordinance No. 13, 1985 on First
Reading to March 19.
THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
-71-
February 5, 1985
Councilmember Ohlson felt the City lacked the very basis of energy conser-
vation, the commercial energy code. He noted the code involved minimum
standards that may be redone because they are already antiquated. He
pointed out the code had been around a long time and is now being adopted
locally. If problems exist, amendments could be made prior to Second
Reading. He urged adoption of the ordinance.
Mayor Horak suggested discussions with the design community be held before
Second Reading to see if additional changes are needed.
The vote on Councilmember Elliott's motion to adopt Ordinance No. 13, 1985
on First Reading was as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Clarke, Elliott,
Horak, Knezovich, Ohlson, and Rutstein. Nays: Councilmember Stoner.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance Appropriating Prior Year
Reserves in the General Fund and
Unanticipated Revenue in the Light
and Power Fund, Adopted on First Readinq
Following is the staff's memorandum on this item:
"On October 20, 1984, the City began a more concentrated cable TV support
program by creating the full-time position of "Cable Support staff person".
Among 'the services provided by this position are support for the Public
Access Advisory Board, support for the Cable Advisory Board, liaison
with Columbine CableVision and departmental support in the areas of cable
use and technology and programming to be aired over the municipal channel.
Funding for this position will be provided by the General Fund and the
Light and Power Fund. The estimated direct cost of $25,000 will be appro-
priated from the General Fund's reserves. This amount is approximately
equal to the Use Taxes paid to the City by Columbine CableVision in 1984.
At the end of 1984, these funds lapsed into General Fund reserves. The
costs associated with management support and facilities for this position
are being provided by the Light and Power Utility through their existing
budget.
The attached ordinance appropriates the $25,000 from prior year reserves in
the General Fund for transfer to the Light and Power Fund, and appropriates
this unanticipated revenue in the Light and Power Fund for expenditure."
Councilmember Rutstein made a'motion, seconded by Councilmember Stoner, to
adopt Ordinance No. 15, 1985 on First Reading.
-72-
February 5, 1985 '
Councilmember Knezovich asked about the job duties of this staff person and
how they worked with Columbine CableVision.
City Manager Arnold replied that Wendy Williams had been assigned to the
cable TV function and noted she had been working with Columbine to improve
relationships and get them involved in the Cable Advisory Board and the
Public Access Board. He noted the two boards had been meeting frequently
and that she also had been handling citizen complaints.
Bruce Lockhart, 2500 East Harmony Road, questioned the timing of the hiring
of this person.
City Manager Arnold replied this had been an internal promotion and as such
had not been advertised.
Mayor Horak noted that. since our franchise agreement was fairly old as,
cable franchises go, the City was attempting to expand the public access
aspect of the system that other cities have available routinely. This
person is the staff support to the two boards recently formed for that
purpose.
Councilmember Clarke felt it was important for the two boards to have staff
support in order to be effective. He stated the City Manager was respond-
ingIto Council's concern that the boards be established and that they
function well.
Mr. Lockhart suggested Columbine CableVision should appropriately fund this
position.
Councilmember Elliott felt this person would facilitate public access
programming and that using the revenues generated by Columbine was a way to
invest in the process.
Councilmember Knezovich agreed with Mr. Lockhart that the position should
be funded by Columbine and that the funding should not come from the use
taxes generated. He felt the costs should not be subsidized by the Light &
Power Fund and that the cost should be borne by the General Fund if the
position was necessary.
Councilmember Ohlson expressed his concerns and noted this position would
not be a high priority one to him. He felt the staff position could be
better utilized in an area other than cablevision. He stated he would
oppose the ordinance.
Councilmember Rutstein supported the ordinance and stated she felt the two
Cable Advisory Boards had been set up in order to have public access
-73-
February 5, 1985
programming. She felt this position was the beginning of public access and
stated Columbine would never fund such a position. She felt the Council
had some responsibility to the citizens of Fort Collins to provide a means
for public access.
Councilmember Stoner pointed out no provision for this position was in-
cluded in the contract with Columbine; therefore there is no way to force
them to fund or establish such a position.
City Manager Arnold stated he felt Columbine would continue to generate use
taxes and noted this ordinance transfers $25,000 from the General Fund to
Light & Power to reimburse Light & Power for the direct costs associated
with the position that will be housed and supervised by Light & Power. He
stated this would be an annual transfer from the General Fund to Light &
Power and that he did not want Light & Power to be funding cable TV either.
He stated Light & Power would pay for the indirect costs (office space,
furniture, etc.) associated with the position.
The vote on Councilmember Rutstein's motion to adopt Ordinance No. 15, 1985,
on First Reading was as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Clarke, Elliott,
Horak, Rutstein, and Stoner. Nays: Councilmembers Knezovich and Ohlson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Citizen Participation
Bruce Lockhart, 2500 East Harmony Road, spoke of the Transportation Utility
Fee and objected to it being charged on the private roads in front of his
residence.
Ken Bonetti, 306 East Elizabeth, representing the Core Area Neighborhood,
expressed support for the Quinby Park project and encouraged its develop-
ment in a timely manner.
Terry Foppe, 622 Whedbee, spoke on the enforcement of the smoking ordinance
in City Hall and asked about the record keeping process for complaints on
enforcement of the ordinance and for tracking expenses associated with
implementing the ordinance.
Chris Nelson, Paired Cities Project, reported on the materials sent by his
group to Telavi, USSR, and on the materials recently received from that
city. He gave a progress report on the project.
Jim Woodward, 430 Garfield, posed questions about the viability of the
43-unit Oak Park Condo project proposed on Remington Street.
City Manager Arnold noted this matter would be, scheduled for the February
19 meeting and more detailed materials will be available prior to that
meeting.
1
-74-
February 5, 1985
Ordinance Appropriating Prior Year
Reserves and Anticipated Revenues
in the Conservation Trust Fund and
Authorizing the Transfer of Appropriations
Between Protects. Adopted on First Readinq
Following is the staff's memorandum on this item.
"The purpose of this ordinance is to appropriate available lottery money in
the Conservation Trust Fund in order to establish a revised 1985 budget for
the Conservation Trust Fund.
When the 1985 budget was adopted by Council, only a small portion ($50,000)
of the available resources from the Conservation Trust Fund (Lottery funds)
was appropriated. It was felt that the Council Open Space Subcommittee
would probably be making specific recommendations for funds, which have
been received, and would make additional -recommendations based upon actual
resources available in the Conservation Trust Fund once those revenues were
officially known.
In the fall of 1983, the Council Open Space Subcommittee was formed to
determine allocation of Lottery funds. This resulted in Council approving
Resolution 84-48 (copy attached). On November 7, 1984, the subcommittee
reconvened. Staff updated members on the status of the existing projects,
and discussed future appropriations of Lottery receipts. Briefly, the
status of each approved project is as follows:
• Foothills Trail - Continuing to negotiate with CSU for trail I
easement.
• Spring Creek and Poudre Trail extensions west of Taft Hill Road -
we have contracted with Alice Richardson to negotiate with property
owners for acquiring easements.
• Fort Collins/Loveland Corridor - funds are being used for the
appraisal.
• Open Space Acquisitions - purchased Roesser property; negotiating
for a purchase along the Poudre River.
1985 Proposed P�,bjects
The previously adopted 1985 budget of $50,000 allocates $25,000 for the
Poudre Trail and $25,000 for the Spring Creek Trail for both acquisition
and development, as designated in Resolution 84-48. These two approved
projects/budgets will remain as allocated. The revised 1985 budget appro-
priates an additional $430,000 from prior year reserves, anticipated
revenues, and transfers from appropriated reserves for a new total 1985
budget of $480,000. Staff has prepared a revised five-year budget as
well.
-75-
I
February 5, 1985
Attached are four location maps labeled "Map A - Approved Open Space
Projects," "Map B - Approved Trail Projects," "Map C - Proposed Lottery
Fund Projects," and "Map D" - Proposed Archery Range/Strauss Cabin Trail
Area." Also attached is a chart showing the total appropriations for all
the approved open space and trail projects, and for the proposed Lottery
Fund projects. The chart lists all the projects numerically, and the chart
numbers correspond to the various maps for location/identification pur-
poses. Projects number 1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 as labeled on Map C
are the specific projects under consideration for the revised 1985 appro-
priation.
These projects are as follows:
#1 - Open Space Acquisition ($50,000)
This project provides a 'pool' of funds to acquire or preserve
open space anywhere within the environs of Fort Collins that
may become available.
#2 - Greenbelt Corridor Acquisition ($70,000)
This item allows the continuation of the investigation and/or the
' acquisition of land or development rights between the cities of
Fort Collins and Loveland to maintain a greenbelt corridor in
this area. In 1984, an additional $100,000 from Lottery funds
and $100,000 from sales tax was allocated to this project for a
total of $270,000.
1
#11 - Poudre River Open Space Acquisition ($130,000)
This item allows us to take advantage of land acquisition along
the river that may encompass more acreage than what is needed
just for a trail corridor.
12 - Strauss Cabin Trail Acquisition/Development ($50,000
The Strauss Cabin trail extends the Poudre Trail an additional
3.5 miles downstream to the historic Strauss Cabin near I-25.
A trailhead will be provided at the proposed archery range.
This project is part of the original trail system recommended
by the Open Space Plan of 1974.' The attached "Map D" more
clearly locates this project.
3 - Fossil Creek Trail
There is no funding proposed for this project until 1988.
-76-
February 5, 1985
#14 - Strauss Cabin Trailhead/Archery Range ($120,000) '
This project consists of constructing trail parking facilities
in conjunction with an archery range on a 50-acre open space
site purchased by the City in 1983. The site is located just
west of I-25 along the Poudre River. Improvements will include a
parking area, shelter, restroom, playground, archery ranges, and
related work. The future Strauss Cabin Trail will tie into the
trailhead providing a connection with upstream portions of the
Poudre Trail. The attached "Map 0" more clearly locates this
project.
#15 - Spring Creek/College Avenue Underpass ($10,000)
This project seeks to provide an off-street crossing of College
Avenue, using the box culvert tunnel which presently channels
Spring Creek. Initial funds would be used to fully study the
feasibility of this project with respect to drainage impacts
and route alignment safety. Later appropriations would provide
construction money.
Parks and Recreation Board Recommendation
The Parks and Recreation Board, at their regular meeting of January 22,
1985, after thorough review and discussion, voted unanimously 8:0 (one I
member absent) to support the five-year Conservation Trust Fund budget as
prepared by staff, and recommend Council adopt the 1985 revised budget as
submitted."
Councilmember Ohlson made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Rutstein, to
adopt Ordinance No. 16, 1985 on First Reading.
Mayor Horak noted he was completely in support of the overall plan but had
concerns for precedents on funding the archery range. He noted lottery
monies were specified for open space and trails and not for development.
He felt the archery range project had merit and noted he felt it could be
funded with any contingency funds available, small capital project, or
could be placed in the budget. He noted staff had drafted an alternate
ordinance to address his concerns that would reduce the Strauss Cabin
appropriation by $26,000 to $94,000.
Councilmember Ohlson made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Rutstein, to
adopt the alternate version of Ordinance No. 16, 1985 on First Reading,
appropriating a total of $404,000 for expenditure in the Conservation Trust
Fund.
City Manager Arnold noted the $26,000 for the archery range project could
probably be found in the Parks & Recreation budget or could be supplemented
by contingency funds.
-77-
I
February 5, 1985
Jim Hinckley, 1900 Larkspur Drive, spoke in support of the need for an
archery range and estimated the number of archers in the area to be approx-
imately 2,000. He noted the Fort Collins Archery Association represented
125 family memberships. He asked for Council support of the project.
The vote on Councilmember Ohlson's motion to adopt the alternate version of
Ordinance No. 16, 1985 was as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Clarke,
Elliott, Horak, Knezovich, Ohlson, Rutstein, and Stoner. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Items Relating to Spaulding Lane
Following is the staff's memorandum on this item:
"A. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 200, 1984, Amending Chapter 95 of the
Code to Provide for the Reimbursement of City Expenses in Constructing
the Local Portion of Streets Adjacent to Undeveloped Land.
B. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 155, 1984, Authorizing the Transfer of
Appropriations Between Capital Projects for the Construction of
' Spaulding Lane.
On December 18, 1984, Ordinance No. 200, 1984 was unanimously adopted on
First Reading. Ordinance No. 155, 1984 was tabled on Second Reading. On
January 15, 1985, staff requested and Council approved, the tabling of both
ordinances on second reading to February 5, 1985, in order for staff to
conclude negotiations with certain property owners regarding this matter.
In the course of those negotiations, the property owners raised concerns
with the wording of Ordinance No. 200 regarding the collection of interest
on monies expended by the City. Staff has reviewed those concerns and
recommends a change in Ordinance No. 200 that would replace the interest
charges with an inflationary increase to be collected at the time of
development. The attached memorandum from City Engineer Tom Hays explains
this change further.
Staff believes this change would encourage developers to donate right of
way needed for City projects and save lengthly legal actions to acquire
right of way through condemnation. The City would lose some interest
earnings but would save staff costs on legal proceedings while the public
would enjoy the benefits of an improved public road.
For these reasons, staff recommends the amendment to Ordinance No. 200,
1984."
Wn
February 5, 1985 '
City Engineer Tom Hays noted there was a need for an amendment to Ordinance
No. 200, 1984 on Second Reading. He noted the change was in the way the
City would cover costs for constructing a street. An inflation factor
would replace interest charges so that at the time the property develops,
the developer is paying back to the City the equivalent of the costs he
would have paid at that time. He felt this would make the negotiation fo,r
right-of-way acquisition much easier and less expensive and felt the
difference in cost was small in relation to the benefits. He read the
proposed amendment which was Section "C" of the ordinance and noted the
language was consistent with the language in Section 99-6 dealing with the
repay on streets.
Councilmember Stoner made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Rutstein, to
adopt Ordinance No. 200, 1984 on Second Reading.
Councilmember Clarke made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Stoner, to,
amend the ordinance by adding Section "C" as described by City Engineer Tom
Hays. Yeas: Councilmembers Clarke, Elliott, Horak, Knezovich, Ohlson,
Rutstein, and Stoner. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
The vote on Councilmember Stoner's motion to adopt Ordinance No. 200, 1984 '
as amended on Second Reading was as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Clarke,
Elliott, Horak, Knezovich, Ohlson, Rutstein, and Stoner. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Councilmember Knezovich made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Rutstein,
to adopt Ordinance No. 155, 1984 on Second Reading. Yeas: Councilmembers
Clarke, Elliott, Horak, Knezovich, Ohlson, Rutstein, and Stoner. Nays:
None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Resolution Making Appointments to the
Storm Drainage Board and the Senior Citizen
Board, Adopted with Names Inserted
Following is the staff's memorandum on this item:
"A vacancy currently exists on the Storm Drainage Board due to the resigna-
tion of Hal Cochrane. The board liaison has conducted interviews for the
vacancy.
-79-
February 5, 1985
' Two vacancies currently exist on the Senior Citizens Board due to the
resignations of Alexander Pender and Gail deVore. The board liaison has
reviewed the applications that were submitted.
Recommendations for each of these vacancies will be forwarded under
separate cover."
Councilmember Stoner proposed Pat Graham be nominated as the Storm Drainage
Board regular member with Constantine Papadakis as the alternate member.
Councilmember Ohlson proposed Virginia Mohr -Callahan be nominated as the
Senior Citizen Board regular member with Charlotte Golden and Paula
Makowsky as the two alternate members.
Councilmember Knezovich made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Ohlson,
to adopt Resolution 85-18 inserting the names as suggested by Council -
members Stoner and Ohlson. Yeas: Councilmembers Clarke, Elliott, Horak,
Knezovich, Ohlson, Rutstein, and Stoner. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
City
Attorney's Report
City Attorney Huisjen
reported on a letter presented to him by Barbara
'
Allison and stated he
Session.
would
like to discuss that letter in an Executive
City
Manager's Report
City Manager Arnold reported
on the increase in Transfort ridership for
1984 noting it had been
a 28%
increase.
He reported that staff
was looking for ways the City and Public Service
could mutually use the
City's
compressed natural gas (methane) depot as a
fueling site for other
fleets
such as state, school district, post office,
etc.
I
He reported on the City's use of sand and salt during December and noted
923 tons had been used..
Councilmembers' Reports
Councilmember Knezovich reported on the progress of the sales tax simplifi-
cation bills and noted it would probably be heard in the House Finance
Committee and then the House Appropriations Committee. He expected the
House Finance Committee to hear the bill the week of February 18.
:1
February 5, 1985
'
Councilmember
Knezovich reported
on the recent PRPA
meeting and spoke on
the possiblity
of undergrounding
a major transmission
line through Longmont
at a cost of
$3-4 million. He
reported on the upcoming
PRPA appeal of
Judge *Sul 1"ivan's
decision in the
recent eminent domain
case relating to the
acquisition of
Foothills substation
site by PRPA.
Resolution Authorizing the City Manager
to Enter into a Professional Services
Agreement with ARIX for the Design and
Construction Management of the South
Lemay Avenue and Horsetooth Road Improvements,
and a Parkinq Lot in Warren Park. Adopted
Following is the staff's memorandum on this item:
"This resolution authorizes the City Manager to enter into a professional
services agreement with ARIX, for the engineering services required for the
design and construction management of the South Lemay Avenue and Horsetooth
Road Improvements and a parking lot in Warren Park.
"South Lemay Avenue and Horsetooth Road Improvements" is a new name for the
"South Lemay - Horsetooth to Harmony Project". The section of Lemay Avenue '
which connects onto Harmony Road has already been completed. This name
change will better reflect the updated scope of work. The budget approved
for 1985 includes $1,883,000 for the design, R.O.W. acquisition, and
construction.
Lemay Avenue will be constructed to arterial standards from Horsetooth Road
south (112 mile) around Warren Lake to connect with the Golden Meadows
Subdivision. Traffic signals will be installed on Horsetooth Road at the
T-intersection with Lemay north, and the T-intersection with Lemay south.
The section of Horsetooth between the two intersections (1/4 mile), will
also be completed to arterial standards. Horsetooth and Lemay will have
landscaped medians, and the area between the sidewalk and the street will
be landscaped. These improvements will be constructed during the summer of
1985.
Parks and Recreation has requested that a parking lot be designed for
Warren Park with access off Lemay. If the parking lot can be built at a
reasonable. cost, Parks and Recreation may have the construction included
with this project. Parks and Recreation will reimburse the project for
expenses associated with the parking lot design and potential construction.
In accordance with the Capital Project Management Control System manual the
consultant selection committee reviewed 13 proposals, most of which were
professionally prepared by well qualified consulting 'firms. The selection
February 5,
1985
t
committee interviewed the top three firms and selected ARIX as the
best
qualified firm for this particular project.
Staff has negotiated a
time
plus services agreement with a not to exceed
cost of $128,500. City
staff
intends to work very closely with ARIX to
keep the design costs
to a
minimum.
11
ARIX has shown great interest in helping make this project a success. They
are eager to begin their work, since two irrigation ditch crossings need to
be install by May 1st., and the street construction is to be bid by June
15th. Construction will to be completed by September 30th.
This project will be financed by the sale of Bond Anticipation Notes.
Until the notes are sold, the project will be financed from within the
Capital Project Fund."
`-Counci'lmember Rutstein'made a motion, -seconded'by 'Councilmember Stoner,
to adopt Resolution 85-21.
City Engineer Tom Hays noted staff was in the process of identifying funds
for the construction of a parking lot adjacent to the street and would be
looking at the design of the lot and investigating funding sources. Funds
may be available by the time bids are taken.
Councilmember Stoner asked if the construction schedule was realistic.
Tom Hays replied in the affirmative, noting the construction was very
straightforward with no conflicting traffic for the contractor to deal
with.
Councilmember Knezovich asked about the median landscaping and expressed
concern that plants with the highest survivability and low maintenance
would be chosen.
The vote on Councilmember Rutstein's motion to adopt Resolution 85-21 was
as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Clarke, Elliott, Horak, Knezovich,
Ohlson, Rutstein, and Stoner. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Resolution Supporting House Bill 1133
Regarding Smoking in Public Places, Adopted
Following is the staff's memorandum on this item:
"Representative James E. Moore (Lakewood) has introduced H.B. 1133 to the
Colorado State Legislature. This bill is similar to Ordinance No. 23, 1984
which was adopted by a vote of the citizens of Fort Collins on November 6,
1984.
ff-M
February 5, 1985 '
Council has directed staff to prepare a Resolution expressing their support
of this legislation which would ban smoking in public places and public
meetings and has been expanded to include airports., train stations, and
institutions.
A copy of the Resolution, if adopted, would be forwarded to the appropriate
legislative representatives."
Councilmember Clarke made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Rutstein,
to adopt Resolution 85-20 and to amend the fifth WHEREAS clause to change
the word "any" to "this" referring to legislation restricting smoking in
public places.
Terry Foppe, 622 Whedbee, asked Council to seek removal of the safety
clause from H.B. 113 so that it could be tested in court or subject to the
referendum process. She felt this restriction was objectionable and should'
not be placed in such a controversial issue.
Councilmember Elliott stated he thought the clause was standard in all
House legislation drafted.
Mayor Horak asked the City Attorney to find out if the clause did in fact
limit the rights of referendum. '
The vote on Councilmember Clarke's motion to adopt Resolution 85-20 as
amended was as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Clarke, Elliott, Horak,
Knezovich, Ohlson, Rutstein, and Stoner. Nays: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Other Business
Councilmember Clarke made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Rutstein,
to adjourn into Executive Session to discuss legal matters relating to the
complaint received by the City Attorney from Barbara Allison. Yeas:
Councilmembers Clarke, Knezovich, Ohlson, Rutstein, and Stoner. Nays:
Councilmembers Elliott and Horak.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
At the conclusion of the Executive Session, City Attorney Huisjen stated
that in the matter of the complaint received from Barbara Allison, 1212
Lynnwood Drive, he was of the opinion that there is no merit to her
complaint and that it is misplaced. The process used in the City of Fort
Collins is to take the complaint of individuals and make a determination of
U-M
I
February 5, 1985
whether there is probable cause. That determination is made by the City
Attorney's office. He stated he did not feel it was proper for him, as the
City Attorney who represents the City of Fort. Collins and the individual
Councilmembers, to make this determination of probable cause. He stated he
had discussed with Council the need for appointing special counsel to make
an investigation. He added he would employ an experienced attorney to
review the matters alleged and to determine if there is probable cause to
believe a violation has occurred.
Councilmember Clarke commented he felt the complaint was without basis but
concurred the matter needed to be reviewed and brought to conclusion.
Councilmember Stoner asked if a counter suit for a frivolous suit could be
filed to recover attorney's fees in the event the special counsel found no
probable cause.
City Attorney Huisjen replied in the negative, since this activity or
process was provided by government to those people who make a complaint in
good faith.
Mayor Horak felt it was important to show government abides by the same due
process that other citizens abide by.
IAdjournment
Councilmember Elliott made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Ohlson,
to adjourn the meeting to 7:00 p.m, on February 12 to hear the appeal of
the Planning & Zoning Board decision on Renaissance PUD. Yeas: Council -
members Clarke, Elliott, Horak, Knezovich, Ohlson, Rutstein, and Stoner.
Nays: None.
The meeting adjourned at 10:05 p.m.
Mayor
1 -84-