Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES-06/21/1994-RegularJune 21, 1994 ' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO Council -Manager Form of Government Regular Meeting 6:40 p.m. A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins was held on Tuesday, June 21, 1994, at 6:40 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City of Fort Collins City Hall. Roll call was answered by the following Councilmembers: Apt, Horak, Janett, McCluskey, and Smith. Councilmembers absent: Azari and Kneeland. Staff Members Present: Burkett, Davis and Roy. Citizen Participation Yolanda C. Nicely, 300 Harmony Road, stated that the park located on Boardwalk had a set of swings removed for repair and have not been replaced. She believed the swings need to be restored or have the post removed. Jane Folson, representative of the DBA Board, stated that downtown activities have increased during the summer months and stated the need for more police presence. She asked if a regular police beat could be acquired for the downtown area for the remaining summer months. Al Baccili, 520 Galaxy Court, asked why the Platte River Power Authority pays dues to the Chamber of Commerce. He stated it was inappropriate to spend City dollars for dues to the Chamber of Commerce. Jeff Bridges, 725 Mathews, stated he prepared and distributed an alternative proposal regarding the Community Decision Making Process Project and has not been contacted for additional information on that proposal. He stated the Community would like to participate in such projects. He stated feedback is necessary and urged Council to review the proposal. Citizen Participation Follow-up Councilmember Janett stated there are consultants working with the City to develop the Community Decision Making Process work plan. She stated the issue of the Platte River Power Authority paying dues to the Chamber is a budget issue that the PRPA Board handles. She stated the City is just one part of the Board and does not have a majority of the vote to defeat the payment of dues to the Chamber. Councilmember Horak stated the PRPA Board consists of 8 members, 6 of which voted for paying dues to the Chamber. He stated Platte River Power Authority contributes to all the Chambers in the four cities. He asked if the Boardwalk Park swings issue could be addressed immediately. He asked for additional ' information on the police needs of the downtown area. 405 June 21, 1994 City Manager Burkett stated he would have the park staff address the Boardwalk Park swing issue immediately and would discuss with the DBA the police needs of downtown and respond to Council with a report on those needs. Councilmember Apt asked about the cost of Jeff Bridges' proposal using the Utility Billing Response System. Councilmember Smith stated a cost estimate for that proposal could be determined by looking at the Bicycle Plan Project which used the Utility Billing Response System. Agenda Review City Manager Burkett stated that for Item #10, Second Reading of Ordinance No. 88, 1994, Amending Chapter 26 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins Pertaining to the Imposition of Fees and Charges for the City's Water Services to Colorado State University and for the City's Wastewater Services to Colorado State University and Other Large Users Having No Negotiated Agreement for such Services, the Ordinance has a minor change in Section 4 under the rate column and should read 11.39 per 1000 gallons of winter quarter water use". He stated the property owners involved with Item #30, Items Relating to the Robert Shields Annexation and Zoning, A. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 92, 1994, Annexing Approximately 18.4 Acres, Known as the Robert Shields Annexation and B. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 93, 1994, Zoning Approximately 18.4 Acres, Known as the Robert Shields Annexation, Into the R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential, District with a PUD Condition; and Item #32, Items Relating to the Wild West Annexation and Zoning, A. Public Hearing and Resolution 94-104 Setting Forth Findings of Fact and Determinations Regarding the Wild West Annexation, B. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 104, 1994, Annexing Property Known as the Wild West Annexation, and C. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 105, Amending the Zoning District Map Contained in Chapter 29 of the Code and Classifying for Zoning Purposes the Property Included in the Wild West Annexation to the City of Fort Collins, request to postpone these annexations to the July 19, 1994, Council meeting. ***CONSENT CALENDAR*** This Calendar is intended to allow the City Council to spend its time and energy on the important items on a lengthy agenda. Staff recommends approval of the Consent Calendar. Anyone may request an item on this calendar to be "pulled" off the Consent Calendar and considered separately. Agenda items pulled from the Consent Calendar by the Public will be considered separately under Agenda Item #25, Public Pulled Consent Items. 406 June 21, 1994 7. This Ordinance, which was unanimously adopted on First Reading on June 7, authorizes the long term lease of property to Gracon Leasing Company for the construction of a flight training facility. Gracon Leasing Company will construct a building and an aircraft parking ramp on the lots. The building, which will be at least 12,000 square feet, will house offices, and include an aircraft maintenance hangar area. At the expiration of the lease, the improvements revert to the ownership of the Cities. The construction of the commercial hangar will generate new revenue for the Airport and help meet the flight training needs of the local community. Fy On May loth, 1994, the City Council heard the appeal of the Arapahoe Farm ' Townhomes P.U.D. The Council upheld the Planning and Zoning Board's March 28, 1994 approval of the project. The Arapahoe Farm Townhomes project does not utilize the extension of Hilburn Drive that was originally provided with the development of the Regency Park P.U.D. Therefore, the City has requested that the developer remove the street stub and vacate the right-of-way so that the unusable dead end public street created by the Arapahoe Farm Townhomes P.U.D. development does not become a maintenance burden to the City nor to the general public. Although the right-of-way vacation eliminates the potential vehicular connection between the Arapahoe Farm Townhomes and the existing Regency Park P.U.D., the developer has agreed to construct a sidewalk to provide a pedestrian and bicycle connection between the two developments. Therefore, the City will retain a portion of the right-of-way for a pedestrian and bicycle access easement. In addition, the City has requested that a portion of the right-of-way be retained for a utility easement to accommodate the existing water line in Hilburn Drive. Staff recommends postponing this item until July 5, 1994, due to pending negotiations between the developers and the adjacent homeowners regarding grading and landscaping concerns. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 87, 1994, Amending Section 28-17 of the 407 10. 11. June 21, 1994 r This Ordinance, which was unanimously adopted on First Reading on June 7, provides greater clarification for enforcement purposes in the existing Section 21-5 of the Model Traffic Code, as adopted in the City Code, relating to skates, skateboards, in -line skates and other similar devices. These revisions to this Section specifically add skateboards, coasters and in -line skates to the list of devices currently covered by Section 21-5. They also clarify the language of the Section pertaining to the posting of traffic control devices to prohibit the use of such devices in certain public areas. In addition, these revisions state that persons riding on roller skates, skateboards, in -line skates, coasters or similar devices in designated areas, such as sidewalks, trails, public plaza areas or other public ways, must yield the right-of-way to pedestrians. On June 15, 1993, the City Council adopted Resolution 93-87 authorizing the City Manager to notify the Colorado State Board of Agriculture of the City's intent to terminate the 1974 service agreement, effective June 30, 1994. The 1974 Agreement set forth the terms and rates pursuant to which the City agreed to provide Colorado State University (CSU) with water and ' sewer services. Rate adjustments required an amendment to the agreement and were effective July 1st of each year, to accommodate CSU's budget cycle. This Ordinance, which was unanimously adopted on First Reading on June 7, modifies Sections 26-127, 26-278, 26-279, 26-281, and 26-284 of the City Code to accommodate CSU as a "normal" customer of the Water and Wastewater Utility, but with unique monthly service charges. The rate adjustment reflected in this Ordinance is consistent with the rate increase (0% for water and 6% for wastewater) that went into effect for other customers on January 1, 1994. Future rate and cost of service adjustments will be implemented along with adjustments for other customer classes, effective the first of the year. M June 21, 1994 Weeds are not only considered a nuisance by many residents of Fort Collins, but some weeds are also considered serious threats to the integrity of natural areas and agricultural lands. The Code of the City of Fort Collins regulates type and height of weeds and grasses permitted within the City limits. Over the last few years, City staff and the public have recognized that the Code needs to be revised to reflect current community and natural areas needs. Two interdepartmental teams, the Ditch Task Force and the Open Space/Natural Areas (OSNA) Management Team, saw a need to change existing City Code regarding weeds, brush, and rubbish, particularly to (1) allow grasses to grow to full mature seedhead height along ditches and in other natural areas to increase wildlife value of these sites and enhance the natural seeding process to reduce bare spots and, thus, reduce undesirable weed establishment; (2) add to the banned weed list, other non-native plant species that are threatening natural areas; and (3) remove from the weed list, desirable native plant species. An interdepartmental subgroup of each of these teams, along with the Larimer County Weed Supervisor, formed the "Weed Code Team" in November 1993 to review existing code and to recommend changes to City Council. This Ordinance, which was unanimously adopted on First Reading on June 7, ' amends Chapter 20, Article III, of the Code of the City regarding weeds, brush, and rubbish, and Article I regarding stagnant water. The Ordinance addresses (1) addition of some non-native plant species to the banned weed list; (2) deletion of all native species from the banned weed list; (3) variances to allow grass to grow to full height on certified natural areas and certified xeriscapes; (4) removal of Sec. 20-1: "Stagnant water declared a nuisance"; and (5) minor editorial changes of various sections for clarity, consistency with other sections, or revisions to names of plant species to be compatible with the most recent publication of Weeds of the West, which is the most widely used reference on weeds. A change has been made in Section 20-44 to delete the language regarding "removal" of weeds and grasses and, in its place to provide for the "cutting or eradication" of the weeds and grasses. Typically, cutting will suffice, but in the case of noxious weeds, eradication would be necessary. 12. This Ordinance, which was unanimously adopted on First Reading on June 7, amends the Land Development Guidance System and Subdivision Regulations to add two weeks to the current "7-week" review process schedule, for a total of "9-weeks", for processing of planned unit developments, subdivision plats and other development matters that appear before the Planning and 409 13. 14. June 21, 1994 Zoning Board. The new processing schedule maintains the current schedule of Planning and Zoning Board meetings, which generally occur on the 4th Monday of each month. The sequence of the stages of the review process will also not change. The major change will be that the date of submittal of a development application will be moved back two weeks. For example, the new submittal date for the October meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board will be on August 22 rather than on September 6 as the current schedule indicates. This Ordinance, which was unanimously adopted on First Reading on June 7, authorizes the transfer of $200,000 to the Capital Projects Fund for additional appropriations in the Shields Street, Laurel to Prospect Choices 95 Capital Project. The additional appropriation is needed because the construction bids for the project exceed the budget estimates. The transfer of funds (recommended funding source) will come from existing appropriations in the Street Oversizing Fund. Activities. On March 5, 1991, the City Council adopted the Harmony Corridor Plan as an element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City. This Plan constitutes a public statement of the City's policies with regard to the future development of the Harmony Corridor area in terms of land use and urban design. The Land Development Guidance System (LDGS) is the principal tool that is used to evaluate development proposals in the Harmony Road corridor. The need for the following amendments became apparent since adoption of the Plan in 1991. The recommended amendments are as follows: Section 1 clarifies that future community/regional shopping centers along Harmony Road should be located at the intersection of two arterial streets; Section 2 clarifies the right of the City to establish locational and land use standards for the purposes of implementing and interpreting the provisions of the LDGS; Section 3 establishes policies LU-4 and LU-5 of the Harmony Corridor Plan as mandatory locational standards in the Harmony Corridor; and, Section 4 eliminates the potential inconsistency in the LDGS with LU-5 as amended. On June 6, 1994, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended that adoption of the amendments be tabled for a sixty day period during which additional citizen input would be received. 410 15. 16. 17. June 21, 1994 On June 7, 1994, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 96, 1994 on First Reading. Two minor changes have been made by City staff to section 3 of the Ordinance; first, clarifying that the locational standards shall be applied to properties approved under the LDGS, and secondly, providing more specific definition of "retail and commercial" land uses. These changes were mentioned during the staff presentation on June 7. The Community Development Block Grant Program provides federal funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to the City of Fort Collins which an be allocated to housing and community development related programs and projects, thereby, reducing the demand on the City's General Fund Budget to address such needs. Ordinance No. 97, 1994, was unanimously adopted on First Reading on June 7, 1994. The owners of the property, Brian A. and Catherine Cole Janonis, are initiating this request for Local Landmark Designation for 1316 West Oak Street known as the Jasper Loomis House. A public hearing was held by the Commission on June 14, 1994, at which time the Commission voted to recommend designation of this property. The Landmark Preservation Commission and City Staff are pleased to recommend the building at 1316 West Oak Street as a local landmark, for its architectural importance. The Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology contacted staff in February, offering to reclaim several inactive mine sites on Meadow Springs Ranch, subject to granting of a Consent for Right of Entry. Based on joint site review, three mine sites have been identified as candidates for reclamation. Two of the sites each contain two separate adits or pits. Each of the three sites has been evaluated by the Colorado Division of Wildlife for the presence of bat colonies (none were found). Had bat colonies been located, the sites would have been sealed with grating rather than simple burial. Completion of these projects will remove a potential hazard associated with any future public access at the Ranch. 411 June 21, 1994 i 1, 18. Items Relating to FAUS and STP Funding for the Hickory and Redwood Bicycle Path Connections. A. Resolution 94-97 Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Intergovernmental Agreement within the Colorado Department of Transportation Allocating $325,100 of the City of Fort Collins Federal -Aid Urban Systems (FAUS) Funds and Surface Transportation (STP) Funds to Construct the Hickory and Redwood Bicycle Path Connections. B. First Reading of Ordinance No. 101, 1994, Appropriating Unanticipated Revenue in the Transportation Division Portion of the Transportation Fund. On April 20, 1993, the City Council authorized staff to enter into an agreement with the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) to construct various bicycle connections in north Fort Collins. These connections include: Redwood/Linden Bikeway Connection: This construction will build the bikeway portion of the roadway along Redwood Street, prior to the roadway being constructed, from Conifer to Linden and Vine Streets to provide a bicycle connection from I northeast Fort Collins to the downtown area. This project has been endorsed by the Transportation Board and approved by the City Council through the NEATS Study. Hickory Street to the Poudre River Trail Connection:. This construction will build a bikepath from Hickory Street to the Poudre River Trail which will create an alternative connection from northeast Fort Collins to the downtown area. This project has been endorsed by the Transportation Board and approved by the City Council in the 1993 budget process. 19. Items Relating to the US 287/Colorado 14 Corridor Project. A. Resolution 94-98 Modifying the Scope of Service for the Transportation Corridor Project on US 287/Colorado 14. First Reading of Ordinance No. 102, 1994, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the Transportation Division Portion of the Transportation Fund. 412 1 1 20. 21. June 21, 1994 City Council approved the US 287/Colorado 14 Corridor project on July 20, 1993. At that time, the Scope of Work for this project included an access control plan, corridor study, a landscaping plan and a historic building analysis in the old town area. Staff has begun work on this project with the URS Consulting firm and has created a citizen's focus group to work on this project. The Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Program monies are approved on an annual basis, by the House and the Senate. This approval process usually takes place shortly after the Federal fiscal year begins (October). This year, the legislation has been delayed because the bill contained major points of disagreement between the House and Senate. In May, the House, Senate and President approved short term Airport Improvement Program Legislation (5.2024), providing funding through June 30. This legislation is a temporary funding measure implemented while a multi year funding bill is pending in the Senate. Now that funds are available, the local FAA Airport District Offices will make grant offers to airports which have applied for AIP(Airport Improvement Program) project funding. The grants from the Denver Airport District Office will be ready for sponsor action on June 20. Because the funding legislation expires on June 30 the grant(s), if approved, must be back to the Denver Airport District Office by June 23. Copies of the grant agreements will be available in the City Clerk's Office on June 20, 1994. On June 2, 1987, the City Council adopted Resolution 87-79 concerning the indemnification of City officials and,employees against certain damages. Resolution 87-79 currently provides, in addition to requiring the City to defend and indemnify City officials and employees against certain civil claims, that the City will also, under certain conditions, reimburse City officials and employees for the attorneys' fees they have incurred in defense of any claim of criminal misconduct. Experience has shown that with respect to reimbursement for these types of attorneys' fees, Resolution 87-79 needs to be amended to provide that such payment shall only be for "reasonable" attorneys' fees, meaning those attorneys' fees of the City official or employee which were reasonably incurred by the official or employee and that were reasonable in amount. 413 June 21, 1994 Resolution 87-79 also currently provides that one of the conditions precedent to the City paying a City official's or employee's attorneys' fees incurred in defense of a claim of criminal misconduct requires that the City Manager determine that the official or employee has not acted in a willful and wanton fashion. Resolution 87-79 fails to provide an alternative City official to make this determination when it is the City Manager who is making the request for reimbursement of attorneys' fees. Therefore, it is recommended that Resolution 87-79 be amended to provide that if it is the City Manager requesting reimbursement for his or her attorneys' fees incurred in defense of any claim of criminal misconduct, that the determination of whether the City Manager acted in a willful and wanton manner be made by special legal counsel appointed for the City rather than by the City Manager. 22. Resolution 94-102 Making Appointments to Various Boards and Commissions. 23. Vacancies currently exist, or shortly will exist, on various boards and commissions due to resignations from board members and the expiration of terms of members of boards and commissions. Applications were solicited during March and April. Council received copies of the applications and Council teams interviewed applicants during May and June. ' Names of those individuals recommended for appointment by each Council interview team have been inserted in the Resolution. A vacancy will shortly exist on the Urban Growth Area Review Board due to the expiration of Lloyd Walker's term. Applications were solicited in March and April, and Councilmembers Janett and McCluskey conducted interviews on June 13. The interview team is recommending Lloyd Walker be reappointed for another term to expire July 1, 1988. 24. Routine Deeds and Easements. Powerline Easement from Raymond J. and Caroline L. Boyd, 608 Brown, needed to install new streetlight electric service. Monetary consideration: $10. Items on Second Reading were read by title by Deputy City Clerk Molly Davis. 7. 414 1 a 10. 12. 13. and Rubbish. Developments and Subdivisions. June 21, 1994 ' 14. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 96, 1994, Amending Section 29-526(D)(2) Activity "C" and Section 29-526(E)(5) of the City Code and Amending the Harmony Corridor Plan, with Regard to Location of Certain Retail Activities. 15. F� 31 Items Relating to the Strachan Farm Annexation and Zoning, A. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 94, 1994, Annexing Approximately 17.9 Acres, Known as the Strachan Farm Annexation. B. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 95, 1994, Zoning Approximately 17.9 Acres, Known as the Strachan Farm Annexation, Into the R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential, District with a PUD Condition. 415 June 21, 1994 Items on First Reading were read by title by Deputy City Clerk Molly Davis. 16. 17. lEia 19 29. 32 33 B. First Reading of Ordinance No. 101, 1994, Appropriating Unanticipated Revenue in the Transportation Division Portion of the Transportation Fund. Items Relating to the US 287/Colorado 14 Corridor Project. B. First Reading of Ordinance No. 102, 1994, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the Transportation Division Portion of the Transportation Fund. Items Relating to the Wild West Annexation and Zoning. A. Public Hearing and Resolution 94-104 Setting Forth Findings of Fact and Determinations Regarding the Wild West Annexation. B. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 104, 1994, Annexing Property Known as the Wild West Annexation. C. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 105, 1994, Amending the Zoning District Map Contained in Chapter 29 of the Code and Classifying for Zoning Purposes the Property Included in the Wild West Annexation to the City of Fort Collins. Items Relating to the Harmony Farm Annexation and Zoning. A. Public Hearing and Resolution 94-105 Setting Forth Findings of Fact and Determinations Regarding the Harmony Farm Annexation. 416 1 June 21, 1994 B. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 106, 1994, Annexing Property Known as the Harmony Farm Annexation. C. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 107, 1994, Amending the Zoning District Map Contained in Chapter 29 of the Code and Classifying for Zoning Purposes the Property Included in the Harmony Farm Annexation to the City of Fort Collins. Councilmember Smith made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Janett, to adopt and approve all items not removed from the Consent Calendar. The vote on Councilmember Smith's motion was as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Apt, Horak, Janett, McCluskey, and Smith. Nays: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Reports Councilmember Smith noted that Council approved on Consent the filling of 55 vacancies on 25 Boards and Commissions and thanked the 172 individuals who applied. Councilmember Apt stated there are vacancies on the Air Quality Board and applications are being accepted. Councilmember Janett stated that a presentation was given at the Water Board meeting regarding a 20 year Master Water Treatment Plan that the City is reviewing. She stated one area that is being researched is making maximum use of the city's water supplies. She stated there may be opportunities for regional cooperation on the plans that are being developed. Councilmember Horak stated the Finance Committee received a management letter from the audit firm and was complimentary overall on how the City of Fort Collins is run. He stated that action is being taken on the North College and Redwood bike paths to make it easier for citizens to move from the north part of town into the core of the city. He complimented Councilmembers Janett and Smith on the scope of the study on US287/Colorado 14 Corridor traffic alternatives. 1 417 June 21, 1994 , ', Ordinance No. 98, 1994 Appropriating Funds from Prior Year Reserves and Authorizing the Transfer of Appropriated Amounts Between Funds for the Purpose of Providing Funding to Construct Streetscape Improvements to Linden and Walnut Streets within the Downtown General Improvement District #1. Adopted on Second Reading The following is staff's memorandum on this item. "FINANCIAL IMPACT This Ordinance appropriates $300,000 from prior year reserves in the Sales and Use Tax Fund for transfer to the General Improvement #1 Fund to be used for the Linden streetscape improvements. The appropriation of $300,000 is from the Use Tax Carryover Reserve. The available balance following the appropriation is estimated at $553,000 following this appropriation. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On June 7, 1994, City Council, Ex-Officio the Board of Directors of the General Improvement District #1 (the "GID") unanimously adopted on First Reading Ordinance No. 35 appropriating prior year reserves in the GID to be used to fund , Streetscape Improvements along Linden Street, between Walnut and Jefferson Streets, at an estimated cost of $623,245. Accordingly, on the same day, City Council unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 98, 1994 on First Reading, appropriating $300,000 in additional funds to be used for streetscape improve- ments on Linden Street. Several options were considered as potential sources of revenue for the Linden Streetscape Improvements. Staff recommends an appropriation of $300,000 from prior year reserves in the Sales and Use Tax Fund. Other potential funding sources are provided in the background section. City Council asked staff to provide additional information on s outlined in detail in the Stormwater Issues section, staff is not recommending that stormsewer improvements be installed at this time along Linden Street. Stormsewer improvements proposed for Linden Street in the old Town Master Plan. BACKGROUND: Financial Issues Staff considered several potential funding sources for the $300,000 in City funds needed for the Linden Streetscape Improvements. General Fund Undesignated Reserves - approximately $1.8 million available. ' 418 ' June 21, 1994 2. Sales and Use Tax Fund, Use Tax Carryover Reserve - (established in 1993 for one-time expenditures) $853,000 available. 3. Sales and Use Tax Fund Capital Projects Reserve/Recycling Contingency - (established in 1986) $50,000 available. 4. Street Oversizing Fund Reserves/General Fund Contribution. The ending 1993 fund balance exceeded $5 million. Staff is recommending the use of $300,000 from the Sales and Use Tax Fund Use Tax Carryover Reserve. The Use Tax Carryover Reserve was established at the end of 1993 and is to be used for one-time expenditures as approved by Council. Staff believes using this reserve for the Linden project fits well given the purpose for which the reserve was established. Staff believes that the $50,000 recycling contingency is not a viable source pending the potential use of these funds for their intended purpose at a later date. Staff also looked at advances from the Street Oversizing Fund or the General Fund with the idea that the GID could repay the advance back over time. This option was not recommended for the following reasons. First, the GID would take many years to repay the advance, causing delays to other projects in the GID Capital Improvement Plan adopted by Council (SEE Attachment 1, Revised Priority List). Staff heard from Council that there is a need and expectation to build GID ' improvements as close to the approved time table as possible. Repaying all or a portion of the money may postpone the LaPorte/College Avenue intersection improvements and may jeopardize $35,000 in ISTEA matching funds. Staff also reviewed other sources associated with past and present capital improvements plans funded primarily through dedicated sales and use taxes. In fact, the initial recommendation that passed on first reading of Ordinance No. 98, included the use of unappropriated amounts within the 114 Cent Necessary Capital Projects Fund. Questions have since arisen about whether this GID project is the kind of project for which the proceeds of this tax should be used. Since other sources were identified and are available without any such questions or constraints, the funding recommendation has been changed for Second Reading. Stormwater Issues The Old Town Master Plan adopted in December of 1993 identified a stormsewer in the portion of Linden Street (see Attachment #2 and #3) affected by the proposed GID #1 improvements. The purpose of this new storm sewer is to serve the center or core area of the block on which the Linden Hotel is located. This storm sewer would be needed when the area behind the buildings that front on the surrounding streets develop. At this time it is anticipated the storm sewer would be needed in approximately ten (10) years. 419 June 21, 1994 During development of the Linden Street GID #1 improvements conversations have taken place between Planning and Stormwater Staffs regarding the need for the storm sewer improvements. It was decided to not pursue the storm sewer improvements at this time for the following reasons: If the storm sewer system was installed today it would not serve any functions until it was tied into in ten (10) years. The monies saved in construction costs would be offset by the repayment by the Old Town Basin to Stormwater reserves with interest. In the past, if a basin borrowed money from Storm Drainage fund reserves that basin would repay reserves for the monies borrowed plus the interest that money would have accrued if it had remained in reserves. If the storm sewer was to be included in the GID #1 project at this stage, the project construction schedule would be increased by approximately three (3) weeks. This would push construction into the Christmas holiday shopping season. The additional time delay would result in increased concrete costs due to winter time paving of Linden Street and would increase construction costs overall due to time delays. The overall consensus from adjacent property owners was to construct the improvements this fall with substantial completion by the end of November. The future storm sewer system is solely located in the alley and street sections and it would not impact the proposed landscaped areas of Linden Street. Since it is unknown how the area will develop in the future, the improvements installed today may or may not be the correct size. The system may need to be enlarged or it may be installed too large thus requiring the unnecessary expenditure of monies. However, delaying the project would result in disruptions to the Linden Improvements in ten (10) years when the storm sewer in installed. Physical disruptions to the surface paving as well as inconviences to the owners and patrons of businesses in the area would occur." City Manager Burkett stated staff has addressed the issues Council was concerned with between first reading and second reading. He stated additional information was provided to Council regarding storm drainage, potential sources of revenue, and the recommendation related to the quarter cent necessary funds was changed. He stated staff is recommending the entire $300,000 to come from the Use Tax Reserve. He stated Use Tax receipts are volatile and a cap was placed on the amount of Use Tax used for the City's annual operations and the amount above that cap has been going into the Use Tax Reserve Fund. 420 June 21, 1994 Councilmember Smith made a motion, seconded by Councilmember McCluskey, to adopt Ordinance No. 98, 1994 on Second Reading. Councilmember Janett stated she supported the Ordinance and believed improvements to the downtown affect the whole community. She stated there is a timing opportunity for minimizing the amount of upset to the downtown users and businesses by combining two projects. She requested that staff compile a report on the rate the revenues come into the City versus the amount of future GID projects. Councilmember Horak stated Old Town is a success and believed this project will be successful. The vote on Councilmember Smith's Second Reading was as follows: McCluskey, and Smith. Nays: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. motion to adopt Ordinance No. 98, 1994 on Yeas: Councilmembers Apt, Horak, Janett, Ordinance No. 103, 1994 of the Council of the City of Fort Collins Establishing a ' Temporary Suspension of the Processing of Applications for Retail and Commercial Planned Unit Developments Within the Harmony Corridor for a Period of Six Months, Option 1A Adopted on First Reading The following is staff's memorandum on this item. "EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Harmony Road corridor offers an important development opportunity for the entire community. On March 5, 1991, the City Council adopted the Harmon Corridor Plan as an element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City to give guidance for future development in the area. The City has recently experienced a substantial increase in the number of applications for retail and commercial development in the Corridor which has raised a number of issues regarding the land use policies of the Harmony Corridor Plan. On June 7, 1994, the City Council directed City staff to prepare, for subsequent review and approval, an ordinance which would place a six-month suspension of the processing of certain retail and commercial planned unit development applications within the Harmony Corridor. During the moratorium period, City staff and the Planning and Zoning Board will review the City's policies regarding retail and commercial development within the Corridor and recommend any necessary amendments to the Harmony Corridor Plan, together with implementation ordinances. The temporary suspension will terminate as of December 21, 1994. Two options for a moratorium are provided. Each of the options is for six -months. The options vary by the scope of land uses to which the moratorium would apply. 421 June 21, 1994 BACKGROUND: The Harmony Corridor, extending from College Avenue to Interstate 25, and one- half mile north and south of Harmony Road, represents an important development opportunity for the entire community. On March 5, 1991, the City Council adopted the Harmony Corridor Plan as an element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City. This Plan constitutes a public statement of the City's policies with regard to the future development of the Harmony Corridor in terms of land use and urban design. The City has recently experienced a substantial increase in the number of applications for new retail and commercial development in the Corridor. This development activity has raised a number of issues regarding the policies of the Harmony Corridor Plan including the proper location, size, quantity, type and design of retail and commercial development that should be permitted in the Corridor. On June 7, 1994, the City Council directed City staff to prepare, for subsequent review and approval, an ordinance which would place a six-month suspension of the processing of certain planned unit development applications containing retail and commercial land uses in the Harmony Corridor. During the period of moratorium, City staff and the Planning and Zoning Board will review the City's policies regarding retail and commercial development within the Corridor and recommend any necessary amendments to the Harmony Corridor Plan, together with I implementation ordinances. The temporary suspension of processing of applications will terminate as of December 21, 1994. Attached are two options for a moratorium on development applications in the Harmony Corridor. Each of the options is for six -months. The options vary by the scope of land uses to which the moratorium would apply. The options are as follows: OPTION I (Suspends all Retail and Commercial; I-25 to College) Option 1 places a 6-month moratorium on processing of Overall Development Plans and preliminary PUD plans containing retail and commercial uses as defined in the City of Fort Collins Standard Industrial Code List, a copy of which is attached. This option would apply to the entire Harmony Corridor. Exemptions from the moratorium include: a) Planned unit developments which have received preliminary or final approval by the Planning and Zoning Board prior to the July 15, 1994 effective date of the moratorium ordinance; 422 1 1 June 21, 1994 b) Development proposals on properties located in the Harmony Market Shopping Center planned unit development (Parcel R of Oak/Cottonwood Farm Overall Development Plan). The Harmony Market Shopping Center is exempt because its retail character is established by the construction of three major anchors stores and further development on the property will not significantly impact the character of the Corridor; and, c) Any use not listed in the ordinance, for example, residential, research facilities, manufacturing, industrial, hospitals, nursery facilities, child care services, schools, offices, and banks. OPTION 2 (Suspends all uses except those specified; I-25 to College) Places a six-month moratorium on processing of Overall Development Plans and preliminary PUD plans in the Harmony Corridor. Uses which are subject to the temporary moratorium are broader in scope than Option 1. For example, Option 2 will also place a moratorium on new warehouses; contractor trades and service buildings; wholesale trade establishments; banks; and, office buildings (except regional or national headquarters). This option would apply to the entire Harmony Corridor. Exemptions from the moratorium include: ' a) Planned unit developments which have received preliminary or final approval by the Planning and Zoning Board prior to the July 15, 1994 effective date of the moratorium ordinance; b) Applications which are residential and/or permitted uses (1) through (5) of the EP, Employment Park District, which are considered to be consistent with the Harmony Corridor Plan, compatible with the neighborhoods adjacent to the Corridor, and would not adversely affect the Corridor or be detrimental to the aesthetic, environmental, traffic or other land uses interests of the City. These uses include: "(1) Research facilities, testing laboratories, offices and other facilities for research and development. (2) Industrial uses (subject to the performance standards required for the IL, Limited Industrial District as set forth in Section 29-368. (3) Hospitals. (4) Regional or national headquarters of a services -producing organization. 1 423 June 21, 1994 1, (5) Vocational, business or private schools and universities." STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of Option 1. Staff does not recommend adoption of Option 2 due to the broader category uses to which the moratorium would apply. Staff believes the list of uses is too extensive and includes uses, for example, offices and banks, which are considered to be consistent with the Harmony Corridor Plan, compatible with the neighborhoods adjacent to the Corridor, and would not adversely affect the Corridor or be detrimental to the aesthetic, environmental, traffic or other land uses interests of the City." City Manager Burkett stated the Ordinance has several options and copies are available for the audience. City Attorney Roy stated there are several revisions to the Ordinance that deal with site plan reviews conducted in the corridor and reviews of Planned Unit Development applications. He stated those changes are technical and apply to all of the options. He reviewed the various revisions in detail regarding the Ordinance. He stated the termination date should be changed from December 21, 1994 to January 15, 1995 and the Ordinance would become effective July 15, 1994. Greg Byrne, Director of Community Planning and Environmental Services, stated ' that staff suggested that Council place a moratorium on superstore applications until the City has had ample time to evaluate this type of development. He stated Council directed staff to prepare an option for a moratorium which would be limited to the Harmony Corridor. He stated the purpose of this moratorium would be to provide the community time to re-evaluate the land use element of the Harmony Corridor Plan. He stated staff recommended a period of six months if Council determines a moratorium is warranted for Harmony Corridor. He stated during the six months staff would meet with affected interests, generate and evaluate alternatives for the Corridor and present them to the Planning and Zoning Board for recommendation. He stated the various pros and cons of the moratorium and what effects it would have on the community. Joe Frank, Assistant Planning Director, stated each of the four options would place a moratorium on commercial and retail development in the Harmony Corridor. He stated what each option addresses and what effects each option would have on development in the Harmony Corridor. Councilmember Janett asked if retail/commercial development occur at each signaled intersection. Frank stated there is the potential of commercial development at each of those intersections and would be restricted to the particular land use for those parcels. 424 1 ' June 21, 1994 Councilmember McCluskey made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Janett, to adopt Ordinance No. 103, 1994 Option IA as amended on First Reading. City Attorney Roy read the various changes made to Ordinance No. 103, 1994 Option lA because those changes were not on file for 48 hours with the City Clerk's Office prior to the Council meeting. Frank stated that Option lA would impose a moratorium for six months on planned unit developments and administrative site plans that contain retail/commercial uses. He stated Option 1A would exempt planned unit developments that were approved prior to the enactment of the Ordinance, the Harmony Market Shopping Center, and the Oakridge Master Plan Parcels A, M, and N. Tim Dolan, 4212 New Hampden Court, stated the Harmony Coalition as a majority supports Option IA of the Ordinance. He stated the entire city needs to be closely reviewed regarding the question of growth. He stated citizen and developer communication must increase dramatically and suggested a roundtable discussion group. He believed the length of the moratorium was sufficient but if all parties participate in the planning needs of the Corridor the length may be decreased. Milan Hanson, 1624 Redberry Court, stated there needs to be more control over the appearance and accessibility of new development in the city. He stated Harmony Road should be an example of quick and smooth traffic flow located in an area that is attractive with mixed use development. He stated the Harmony Corridor Plan is an excellent blue print for future developments on Harmony Road. He stated the Harmony Corridor Plan should be enforced to control development and create a balance along Harmony Road. He stated this moratorium removes pressure and creates the opportunity to create and adopt the regulations that support the Harmony Corridor Plan. Harold Swope, 4925 Hogan Drive, stated his concerns with regard to the development along Harmony Road. He supported Option IA and believed the LOGS will protect the area from the various developments throughout the corridor. Jenny Wilcock, 4160 Sumter Square, stated a moratorium placed on retail and commercial development along Harmony Road would be appropriate. She stated the children who attend Kruse Elementary should not have their safety jeopardized for development reasons. She stated the moratorium would provide the City time to explore development options along the Harmony Corridor. Yolanda Nicely, 300 Harmony Road, stated she strongly opposes a moratorium on development in the Harmony Corridor. She stated the moratorium would diminish the amount of new jobs for the people of Fort Collins. She stated this project is a survival issue for working people of this community. She stated Fort Collins has room to grow and the more development there is the better it is. 425 June 21, 1994 Orly Penny, 4401 San Remo Circle, urged Council to adopt Option IA of the Ordinance. She stated that there has been an explosion of development over the past 10 years. She stated the quality of life diminishes when development grows so rapidly. She stated the Harmony Corridor Plan preserves the quality of life for the community and should be taken into full consideration when analyzing development for Harmony Road. Don Churchwel l , 5219 Abbey Road, CEO and President of Bank One, stated the neighborhood favors the development of Bank One. He stated Bank One's proposal went through the PUD review process and a neighborhood meeting was held for comments and suggestions. He urged Council to adopt Option lA of the Ordinance and believed it did not present any undue burden on the Bank One project. Mark Goldberg, real estate developer, stated the Harmony Corridor Plan is a great planning tool for the Harmony Corridor. He stated placing this moratorium on development sends the message to businesses that they are not welcome in this community. He stated he was opposed to the Ordinance and urged Council not to adopt Option 1A. He believed the moratorium is a knee jerk reaction to growth. He stated this project is spot zoning against several existing development proposals. Jennifer Carpenter, 1719 Hotchkiss Drive, stated Option 1 of the Ordinance is the least restrictive. She stated Option 1 allows development in categories that are ' generally consistent with the Harmony Corridor Plan. She stated the project is not an issue of growth versus no growth, it is an issue of planned growth. She stated the moratorium will provide time for communication and creation of an enforceable implementation plan. Robert Story, 4420 Monoco Place, stated he supported Option IA of the Ordinance and urged Council to adopt the Ordinance. He asked how the largest proposed food store in Fort Collins could be considered as a neighborhood store. He stated the moratorium would allow ample time to work on strategies for what types of uses are compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. Peter O'Neill, 906 Whalers Way, stated he was more concerned with what new plans were to be considered and implemented rather than the placing a moratorium on the Harmony Corridor. He stated the proposed retail stores are too big for the proposed sites. He stated the IDGS is based on the principle of mixed use, which presumes that most residential, commercial, retail and recreational developments would have characteristics that would allow them to be compatible. He stated a planning forum should be held with citizens to explain the City's planning principles. He stated the City should be planned as a whole, not piece by piece. He stated superstores are a new category of development and need specific planning rules. June 21, 1994 Peter Kast, vice president of GT Land, stated he was against the moratorium and believed the current planning structure can handle such developments as superstores. He stated that if a moratorium is the way the City believes it need to proceed then it needs to be limited and on a short term basis. He stated a moratorium for less than six months would be adequate for citizen input and development of new plans. Richard Poche, 4507 Seaboard Lane, stated he supports the moratorium on commercial development in the Harmony Corridor. He stated the delay in commercial development would not hurt the city. He stated much of the big picture of what Fort Collins would look like in the future is based on the decision whether to support the moratorium or not. He urged Council to adopt Option IA of the Ordinance. David Roy, 1039 West Mountain, stated the changes made to items prior to the meetings should be made public ahead of time and not presented at the time of the meeting. He urged Council to adopt Option 2 of the Ordinance. Scott Mason, 861 Sandy Cove Lane, urged Council to adopt Option IA of the Ordinance. He stated there has been a flood of retail and commercial development applications in the Harmony Corridor and those applications threaten the intent of the Harmony Corridor Plan. He believed the City needs to take a six month timeout to revisit and redefine the Harmony Corridor Plan. He stated strong neighborhood planning for the Harmony Corridor is warranted and that retail/commercial land use threaten the vision of the Harmony Corridor Plan. Lucia Liley, representative of the South Collindale Partnership, stated the partnership is the owner of a parcel in the Golden Meadows Master Plan that has been identified and approved for a shopping center use. She stated the moratorium is too broad and affects sites that are far along in the City development process. She stated the Partnership has worked with the City to develop a plan consistent with the area's development and the City's master plan. She stated the City approved its master plan in 1980 for the Golden Meadows parcel and the plan continued to change as the Harmony Corridor Plan was developed. She stated that the moratorium is not appropriate for the site that is in the late stages of the development process. She stated if the Council approves the moratorium that it should consider shortening the moratorium to a 90-day period consistent with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board, to identify a process which would insure that landowners of undeveloped property along Harmony Road become a part of the working process for recommendations for the Corridor, and articulate very clearly a logical rationale for those exempted areas along Harmony Road. 427 June 21, 1994 ; Janetha Boswell, 825 Sandy Cove Lane, stated this project is a very volatile issue. She stated property owner rights need to be taken into consideration. She believed projects of this magnitude need to be reviewed extensively before being approved. She urged Council to adopt Option IA of the Ordinance. She stated the six month time frame is not necessary and could be shortened. She believed low to middle income housing opportunities should be incorporated within the discussions of the Harmony Corridor. Kevin Keane, 4106 Attleboro Court, urged Council to adopt Option IA of the Ordinance. He stated growth within and around to the city is out of conceptual control. He stated the King Soopers proposal demonstrates the pressures and confusions involved with planning issues in the Harmony Corridor. He stated the proposed development of the shopping center should not be considered a neighborhood shopping center but a regional shopping center. He stated the proposed King Soopers is the largest planned supermarket in Fort Collins. He stated the moratorium gives the residents, developers and the City time to work through the planning concerns along Harmony Corridor. Les Kaplan, Harmony/Timberline property owner, believed a six month moratorium is not necessary. He believed a 3 to 4 month moratorium would be more effective and would provide a concentrated approach to solving the development issues along Harmony Road. Wayne Schrader, 800 Garfield, property owner on Harmony and Boardwalk, urged Council not to adopt a moratorium. He believed the Harmony Corridor Plan set , forth the guideline for the use of Harmony Road as a gateway to the City of Fort Collins. He stated Harmony Road is not a residential area. He stated placing a six month moratorium on all development is penalizing everyone. He stated the moratorium is not necessary for the smaller developments that are acceptable to the neighborhoods. He stated a six month moratorium places a delay on a project for at least a year and the people who have made good faith investments in the area are the one's who are going to suffer from the moratorium. He believed there are more cons than pros to the Ordinance. Bob Pennock, 2125 Ryeland Lane, stated that commercial development would always take place within the City of Fort Collins. He stated that almost every major street would have some type of retail/commercial development. He stated Council should make a provision to allow for a large scale shopping center that should be located on a major arterial. Councilmember Janett asked about the term spot zoning. City Attorney Roy stated that it is zoning that is targeted at a particular parcel of property, that does not bear a substantial relationship to the overall welfare of the community, and is done on an arbitrary basis. Councilmember Smith asked about the timeframe for the planning of the proposal. ' 428 June 21, 1994 Byrne stated that if the land use element of the plan was revisited a task force of affected interests in the community would be need for a complete review. He stated the six month timeframe could be reduced and if Council chose to lessen the timeframe it would require the suspension of work on other activities. He stated the planning staff could produce various options and present them to the affected parties rather than having the affected parties participate in the production of the options, which would shorten the process. Councilmember Smith stated he supported Option lA with a six month delay. He believed that a faster delay would cause some dislocation for other activities that staff needs to be working on. He stated the Harmony Corridor is a very important and crucial issue to the city; however, it is just one section among many that need review. He stated every citizen has a personal responsibility to participate in the process. He stated the moratorium is basically a pause for planning and not the end to any activity. He stated this Ordinance is a step in a long term investment for the future of this community. Councilmember McCluskey believed that the moratorium provides a timeout period and would be good if the time is used effectively. He stated that staff should review the timeframe again. He stated that before second reading a draft of the work agenda and how it will be processed should be prepared. He believed this project is a process issue and believed the Harmony Corridor Project needs to be refined. Councilmember Apt stated he would support the Ordinance and thanked everyone who participated in the process. He stated the Ordinance should not send the message of no growth but that growth is being managed and fine tuned to the needs of this community. He stated the scale of the projects is the real issue and not a growth versus no growth issue. He stated projects such as this have taken on regional characteristics which has a substantial impact on the community. He stated the planning staff is overwhelmed, and believed the six month delay would provide adequate time for staff to work on the project effectively. Councilmember Janett stated this project concerns multiple properties and proposals along the Harmony Corridor. She stated this Ordinance presents many opportunities for the community, staff, and the developers to work together to come to an agreement on what the vision is for Harmony Road. She stated the vision of Harmony Corridor consists of mixed uses, close accessibilities to various services, and provides a showplace for the city. She stated the moratorium provides the opportunity for time to decide on the best direction for the Harmony Corridor. She stated Harmony Road is the southern entryway for the city and should provide free flowing traffic to the community. She stated the number of stop lights is a concern. Councilmember Horak stated he would support the Ordinance and believed a plan of action should be developed before Second Reading. He stated the moratorium provides time to develop a plan that works for the citizens of Fort Collins. He stated that at the end of the process there is at least a month for the Planning 429 June 21, 1994 , 1 and Zoning Board to review and make a recommendation. He stated that after the Planning and Zoning Board reviews the plan and makes its recommendation then Council would review an Ordinance on what the action is going to be for the project. The vote on Councilmember McCluskey's motion to adopt Ordinance No. 103, 1994 Option IA as amended on First Reading was as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Apt, Horak, Janett, McCluskey, and Smith. Nays: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. Items Relating to the Robert Shields Annexation and Zoning. Postponed The following is staff's memorandum on this item. "EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 92, 1994, Annexing Approximately 18.4 Acres, Known as the Robert Shields Annexation. B. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 93, 1994, Zoning Approximately 18.4 Acres, Known as the Robert Shields Annexation, Into the R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential, District with a PUD Condition. This Ordinance, which was unanimously adopted on First Reading on June 7, approves the request to annex and zone approximately 18.4 acres located east of County Road #9 and one-half mile north of Harmony Road. The property is currently zoned FA-1 Farming in the County which allows single-family residential development with a minimum lot size of 2.29 acres. The requested zoning is the R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential, District with a PUD condition. The R-L-P District could allow for a variety of housing types and densities through the PUD process, but due to the property's relatively small size a variety of uses is not likely to occur. The property is presently undeveloped. This is a voluntary annexation of property located in the Fort Collins Urban Growth Area." Councilmember Smith made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Apt, to postpone Ordinance No. 92, 1994 and Ordinance No. 93, 1994 on Second Reading to July 19, 1994. City Manager Burkett stated it was a request from the property owner to postpone Second Reading of the Ordinance's to July 19, 1994. Councilmember Horak stated if a property owner requests postponement the City generally adheres to the request until the owner is ready to be annexed into the City. 430 11 June 21, 1994 The vote on Councilmember Smith's motion to postpone Ordinance No. 92, 1994 and Ordinance No. 93, 1994 on Second Reading was as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Apt, Horak, Janett, McCluskey, and Smith. Nays: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. Items Relating to the Strachan Farm Annexation and Zoning. Adopted on Second Reading The following is staff's memorandum on this item. "EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Second Reading of Ordinance No. 94, 1994, Annexing Approximately 17.9 Acres, Known as the Strachan Farm Annexation. B. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 95, 1994, Zoning Approximately 17.9 Acres, Known as the Strachan Farm Annexation, Into. the R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential, District with a PUD Condition. This Ordinance, which was unanimously adopted on First Reading on June 7, ' approves the request to annex and zone approximately 17.9 acres located east of County Road #9 and north of the Hewlett Packard Plant on Harmony Road. The property is currently zoned FA-1 Farming in the County which allows single-family residential development with a minimum lot size of 2.29 acres. The requested zoning is the R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential, District with a PUD condition. The R-L-P district could allow for a variety of housing types and densities through the PUD process, but due to the property's relatively small size a variety of uses is not likely to occur on the site. The property is presently undeveloped. This is a voluntary annexation of property located in the Fort Collins Urban Growth Area." Councilmember Smith made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Apt, to adopt Ordinance No. 94, 1994 on Second Reading. Sandra Thomas, 4104 South County Road 9, stated the proposed project has inherently incompatible uses for the surrounding area. She stated that according to the Natural Areas Policy Plan, the proposed area for annexation is classified as a Natural Area and serves as a wildlife corridor. She stated the proposed annexation and surrounding area is defined in the Intergovernmental Agreement for Urban Growth as a significant wildlife habitat because it is a geographical area containing. essential elements of food, water, cover, and space for wildlife habitat. She stated the surrounding property owners request denial of the project to be consistent with the Natural Areas Policy Plan which states that the City must direct growth away from environmentally unique lands which can be shown to have special values to people. She stated the area is a visual resource to ' the community. She stated the Harmony Corridor Plan describes the area as a 431 June 21, 1994 ; unique blend of rural scenery. She stated the property adjacent to the proposed project is a flood plain and believed that would cause a severe storm drainage problem. She presented pictures of the proposed project and surrounding area. Sue Henderson, 3824 Nite Court, stated the issue surrounding the proposed project is the loss of quality of life to the area. She stated the neighborhood is rural and should not become a high density area. She stated that her family raises chickens and if the property were annexed into the City that would prohibit them from raising chickens. She stated the three proposed annexations are not cohesive and would destroy the quality of life that has been created for the area. Katherine Sands, 3816 Nite Court, stated her property is located in the County and enjoys the rural lifestyle that surrounds the area. She stated the residents of the area need the space that is currently surrounding the properties for the animals in the area. She stated the watershed has changed and presents some flooding issues and prior to any annexation in the area the watershed issue should be reviewed in great detail. David Thomas, 4104 South County Road 9, stated his family has resided there for 28 years and believes the area is a rural setting and should remain a rural setting. He stated the area is consistent with wildlife and a well balanced ecosystem. He believed if the annexations were to take place those habitats I would be destroyed. He stated County Road 9 is a greenbelt transitional zone that should remain as is. Councilmember Janett asked staff to elaborate on the natural areas surrounding the proposed annexations. Ken Waido, Chief Planner, provided a map to Council from the Landscape Opportunities Study. He stated the proposed annexation is located north of Hewlett Packard and considered to be a natural resource area. He stated there is a protection area along the Poudre River floodplain. He explained the various surrounding zones in relationship to the proposed annexation. He stated there is a reclamation area and a bird preserve that would be located near the annexation. He stated there is a potential for paved bikeways in the general vicinity of the annexation. Councilmember Janett asked if storm drainage issues in regards to the annexation are inventoried in the Natural Areas Policy Plan. Waido believed the storm drainage issue is addressed in the Natural Areas Policy Plan and is a part of the Gateway Concept in the Harmony Corridor Plan. He stated there are no significant natural features within the proposed annexations. Councilmember Janett asked if the development of the proposed annexation would impact the ridgeline area. 432 1 1 June 21, 1994 Waido stated that during the development review process the proposed development would be reviewed interphasing it with the ridgeline area and maintaining a buffer zone ensuring that there would not be any impact to the ridgeline area. Councilmember McCluskey asked how the floodplain would be dealt with in regards to the proposed annexation. Waido stated there are no floodplains located within the areas of the annexations. He stated the existing floodplain is associated with the Poudre River which is located east of the ridgeline. Councilmember Janett asked if staff considered placing a restriction in the annexation agreement that would protect the ridgeline. Waido stated the mechanisms within the Land Development Guidance System would address issues such as that during the development review process and would not need to be placed within an annexation agreement. Councilmember McCluskey stated the development review process was designed to address issues such as the wildlife habitat and storm drainage concerns. He stated issued such as that should not be addressed during the annexation. The vote on Councilmember Smith's Second Reading was as follows: McCluskey, and Smith. Nays: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. motion to adopt Ordinance No. 94, 1994, on Yeas: Councilmembers Apt, Horak, Janett, Councilmember Smith made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Apt, to adopt Ordinance No. 95, 1994, on Second Reading. Councilmember Janett stated the Urban Growth Area is the ultimate boundary that has been in effect for a long time. She stated that the proposed area for annexation is expected to become an urban area. She stated the zoning proposed for that area is low density by City standards and has a PUD condition that helps the neighborhoods negotiate a plan that fits in with the existing environment. The vote on Councilmember Smith's motion to adopt Ordinance No. 95, 1994, on Second Reading was as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Apt, Horak, Janett, McCluskey, and Smith. Nays: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. 433 June 21, 1994 ' Items Relating to the Wild West Annexation and Zoning. Postponed The following is staff's memorandum on this item. "EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Public Hearing and Resolution 94-104 Setting Forth Findings of Fact and Determinations Regarding the Wild West Annexation. B. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 104, 1994, Annexing Property Known as the Wild West Annexation. C. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 105, 1994, Amending the Zoning District Map Contained in Chapter 29 of the Code and Classifying for Zoning Purposes the Property Included in the Wild West Annexation to the City of Fort Collins. This is a request to annex and zone approximately 8.2 acres located east of County Road 9 and 114 mile south of Horsetooth Road. The requested zoning is the R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential, District. The property is presently undeveloped, but the applicant plans to construct a single-family home on the site. The property is currently zoned FA-1 Farming in the County which allows single-family residential development with a minimum lot size of 2.29 acres. The ' applicant is being required to annex as a condition of receiving City sewer service. This is a voluntary annexation of property located within the Fort Collins Urban Growth Area. APPLICANT: Michael E. West 1424 Twin Oak Court Fort Collins, CO 80525 OWNER: Same BACKGROUND: The applicant and property owner, Michael E. West, has submitted a written petition requesting annexation of approximately 8.2 acres located east of County Road 9 and 114 mile south of Horsetooth Road. The requested zoning is the R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential, District. The property is presently undeveloped, but the applicant plans to construct a single-family home on the site. The property is currently zoned FA -I Farming in the County which allows single-family residential development with a minimum lot size of 2.29 acres. This is a voluntary annexation of property located within the Fort Collins Urban Growth Area. The property is located within the Fort Collins Urban Growth Area. According to policies and agreements between the City of Fort Collins and Larimer County contained in the INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE FORT COLLINS URBAN GROWTH ' 434 1 June 21, 1994 AREA, the City will consider the annexation of property in the UGA when the property is eligible for annexation according to State law. The property gains the required 116 contiguity to existing city limits from a common boundaries with the Spring Creek Farms Third and Fourth Annexations to the west and the pending Robert Shields Annexation to the south. The surrounding zoning and existing land uses are as follows: N: FA-1, Farming, large lot single-family residential E: FA-1, Farming, large lot single-family residential S: Pending Robert Shields Annexation R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential, undeveloped W: R-L-P, English Ranch, single-family residential subdivision E-P, Employment Park, undeveloped The requested zoning for this annexation is the R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential, District. The R-L-P District designation is for areas planned as a unit to provide variation in use, density, and building placement. The owner intends on constructing a single-family home on the site. A building site was approved by Larimer County as Tract 1 of the Nussbaumer Minor Residential Development (M.R.D.). Approval of the M.R.D. by the County contained a condition that the property annex to the City at the time of development. The City also requires contiguous properties, which receive City utility services, to annex. The owners will utilize City sewer service, thus the request for annexation. County Road 9 is planned as a future City's MASTER STREET PLAN. Staff doe City for infrastructure improvement Family house on the property. Findings s s arterial (4-7anes) street according to the not anticipate any significant cost to the required by the development of a single - The annexation of this area is consistent with the policies and agreements between Larimer County and the City of Fort Collins contained in the INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE FORT COLLINS URBAN GROWTH AREA. The area meets all criteria included in State law to qualify for a voluntary annexation to the City of Fort Collins. On May 17, 1994, the City Council approved a resolution which accepts the annexation petition and determines that the petition is in compliance with State law. The resolution also initiates the annexation process for this property by establishing the date, time and place when a public hearing will be held regarding the readings of the Ordinances annexing and zoning the area. The requested R-L-P District is in conformance with the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 435 June 21, 1994 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the annexation and requested zoning. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Board, at its regular monthly meeting on May 23, 1994, voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the requested annexation and zoning as part of the Board's Consent Agenda." Councilmember McCluskey made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Smith, to postpone Resolution 94-104, Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 104, 1994, and Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 105, 1994, to July 19, 1994. The vote on Councilmember McCluskey's motion was as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Apt, Horak, Janett, McCluskey, and Smith. Nays: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. Items Relating to the Harmony Farm Annexation and Zoning. Adopted The following is staff's memorandum on this item. "EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I A. Public Hearing and Resolution 94-105 Setting Forth Findings of Fact and Determinations Regarding the Harmony Farm Annexation. B. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 105, 1994, Annexing Property Known as the Harmony Farm Annexation. C. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 107, 1994, Amending the Zoning District Map Contained in Chapter 29 of the Code and Classifying for Zoning Purposes the Property Included in the Harmony Farm Annexation to the City of Fort Collins. This is a request to annex and zone approximately 155.6 acres located south of Harmony Road and east of County Road 9. The requested zoning is the E-P, Employment Park, District. The property is presently undeveloped. The property is currently zoned FA-1, Farming in the County, which allows single-family residential development with a minimum lot size of 2.29 acres. This is a voluntary annexation of property located within the Fort Collins Urban Growth Area. APPLICANT: Eldon Ward Cityscape Urban Design, Inc. 3555 Stanford Road, Suite 105 Fort Collins, CO 80525 , 436 11 June 21, 1994 OWNER: John R. Moore K & M Company 3201 Shore Road Fort Collins, CO 80524 BACKGROUND: The applicant, Eldon Ward of Cityscape Urban Design, Inc., on behalf of the owner, John R. Moore of the K & M Company, has submitted a written petition requesting annexation of approximately 155.6 acres located south of Harmony Road and east of County Road 9. The requested zoning is the E-P, Employment Park, District. The property is presently undeveloped. The property is currently zoned FA-1, Farming in the County which allows single-family residential development with a minimum lot size of 2.29 acres. This is a voluntary annexation of property located within the Fort Collins Urban Growth Area. The property is located within the Fort Collins Urban Growth Area. According to policies and agreements between the City of Fort Collins and Larimer County contained in the INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE FORT COLLINS URBAN GROWTH AREA, the City will consider the annexation of property in the UGA when the property is eligible for annexation according to State law. The property gains the required 116 contiguity to existing city limits from a common boundaries with ' the Harmony Annexation No. to the north, the Ricketts First and Second Annexations to the east, and the South Harmony Annexation to the west. The surrounding zoning and existing land uses are as follows: N: I-L, Limited Industrial, Hewlett Packard plant E: FA-1 Farming, undeveloped B-P, Planned Business, undeveloped S: FA-1 Farming, undeveloped W: E-P, Employment Park, Mountain Crest Hospital The requested zoning for this annexation is the E-P, Employment Park, District. The E-P District designation is for areas of the city which have been designated as "employment parks" in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The property will probably eventually develop as an employment center and possibly contain a mixture of land uses. According to the City's HARMONY CORRIDOR PLAN this property should be included within a future employment park. There are no immediate development plans for the property. Harmony Road is planned as a future major arterial (6-lanes) street according to the City's MASTER STREET PLAN. The property is adjacent to a major sewer line located in County Road 9. Other service will need to be extended to serve the property. Development of the property will be required to address the City's off -site street policy, which requires access to an improved arterial street (minimum 35 foot wide pavement constructed to arterial standards). County Road ' 9 would likely need to be improved upon development of the property and access 437 June 21, 1994 ,/ points on Harmony Road will need to comply with the Harmony Road Access Control Plan. As the property develops, the City will collect the appropriate fees for water and sewer services, storm drainage, parkland (if residential development occurs), and street oversizing. The staff does not anticipate any other significant costs to the City for infrastructure improvements required by new development -of the property. Findings 1. The annexation of this area is consistent with the policies and agreements between Larimer County and the City of Fort Collins contained in the INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE FORT COLLINS URBAN GROWTH AREA. 2. The area meets all criteria included in State law to qualify for a voluntary annexation to the City of Fort Collins. 3. On May 17, 1994, the City Council approved a resolution which accepts the annexation petition and determines that the petition is in compliance with State law. The resolution also initiates the annexation process for this property by establishing the date, time and place when a public hearing will be held regarding the readings of the Ordinances annexing and zoning the area. 4. The requested E-P District is in conformance with the policies of the I City's Comprehensive Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the annexation and requested zoning. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Board, at its regular meeting on May 23, 1994, voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the proposed annexation and requested zoning as part of the Board's Consent Agenda." Ken Waido, Chief Planner, stated the annexation consists of 155 acres located south of Hewlett Packard with Harmony Road being the northern boundary. He stated the property is located within the Urban Growth Area and has the required contiguity. He stated the zoning recommendation is EP-Employment Park Zone which is consistent with the Harmony Corridor Plan. He stated the Planning and Zoning Board has recommended the annexation and zoning be approved. Councilmember Janett asked if the billboards along Harmony Road are in the area of the proposed annexation. City Manager Burkett stated the billboards are located outside the City limits and east of the proposed site. , 438 1 June 21, 1994 Waido stated if there were any billboards located on the proposed property they would have to comply with the City Sign Code within five years. Councilmember Smith asked if the property located to the northeast was developed. Waido stated that a series of 4 or 5 large lots are located immediately east and there is no developed property where the annexation is going to take place. Councilmember Smith made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Apt, to adopt Resolution 94-105. Nancy Gray, resident, stated she was concerned with what might happen to the property after it is annexed into the City. The vote on Councilmember Smith's motion to adopt Resolution 94-105 was as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Apt, Horak, Janett, McCluskey, and Smith. Nays: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Ordinance No. motion was as Smith. Nays: Janett made 106, 1994, on follows: Yeas None. THE MOTION CARRIED. a motion, seconded by Councilmember Apt, to adopt First Reading. The vote on Councilmember Janett's Councilmembers Apt, Horak, Janett, McCluskey, and Councilmember Smith made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Janett, to adopt Ordinance No. 107, 1994, on First Reading. The vote on Councilmember Smith's motion was as follows: Yeas: Councilmembers Apt, Horak, Janett, McCluskey, and Smith. Nays: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. Ac The meeting adjourned at 9:32 p.m. ATTEST: 4rJ. 439