HomeMy WebLinkAboutWORK SESSION SUMMARY-10/14/2008-Work SessionCity of
Fort Collins
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 17, 2008
To: Mayor and City Council Members
Through: Wendy Williams, Acting City Manager "t4� LAI'
Diane Jones, Deputy City Manager
Brian Janonis, Fort Collins Utilities x cutive Director
From: Jim Hibbard, Water Engineering and Field Operations Manager
Utilities
700 wood St.
PO Box 580
Fort Collins. CO 80522
970.221.6700
970.224,6619 - fax
fcgov.com
Reference: October 14, 2008 Work Session Summary - Stormwater Program Review
Brian Janonis, Fort Collins Utilities Executive Director, Jim Hibbard, Water Engineering and
Field Operations Manager, and consultants Barbara Cole of Community Matters and Neil Grigg
of Colorado State University, presented Council with a brief overview of the feedback from the
interviews with Council regarding changes to the Stormwater program. Council members
present included Mayor Doug Hutchinson, Mayor Pro Tem Kelly Ohlson, David Roy, Diggs
Brown, Ben Manvel, and Lisa Poppaw.
Council members reviewed and discussed materials provided and provided feed back on key
policy areas which should be examined and evaluated. Key discussion areas and apparent
conclusions by Council:
1. Evaluate the Program Now. The time is right to review the overall stormwater
program and the review should be finished by March 31, 2009. This comprehensive
view of the Utility would include: capital improvements; water quality or best
management practices; floodplain management; and emergency response.
2. Re-examine Adopted Policies. While the stormwater staff is doing competent work
and follows current policy, Council wishes to thoroughly evaluate current policy,
specifically the appropriate level of flood protection. Is the intensity of the capital
projects reasonable? A clear explanation of program objectives is needed, to include
issues such as protecting from wet basements versus protecting against major, life -
threatening floods. Council would like to see details such as the events that cause risk
and the consequences of various actions.
3. Revise the Mission Statement. The stormwater program needs a new mission
statement to reflect a 21" Century Utility and needs a greater environmental
emphasis.
4. Evaluate Community benefits through Budgeting for Outcomes. The City needs
to evaluate how the program fits in with the bigger picture of the community. What
Fort Collins
is the outcome of decreasing Stormwater rates to allow for increases in other needed
City services? The placement of the stormwater program in the Safe Community
Result Area in the Budgeting for Outcomes process should be revisited
5. Review Capital Projects: Council wants to assess capital expenditures. What are we
protecting against? What is gained if the build out period is changed? Are there
other viable alternatives that will result in an appropriate level of protection such as
moving citizens from the floodplain instead of protecting them? What is the result if
we cut all capital projects? What is the resulting rate for only on -going operations and
maintenance? How do the City of Fort Collins rates compare with that of like
communities? A review of staff methods to analyze and prioritize capital projects
should be conducted, with a focus on holistic and environmental impacts.
6. Evaluate the Rate Structure: Who pays and who benefits? Review how monthly
rates are calculated and how they relate to customer impacts on the stormwater
system. Larger lots with more impervious areas should pay more. Fewer
improvements are needed in the newer south part of town than the older north part,
should the City maintain a city-wide fee structure for distributed community benefits?
Some Council members feel that the city-wide fee is appropriate; others need to better
understand how the rate structure creates additional benefits. A study is needed of
whether, under current criteria, runoff rates from vacant ground are higher than runoff
rates from developed ground and whether there is a "double charge" when impact
fees are collected.
7. Understand Land Use Implications. A review is needed of policies for removal of
vacant land from floodplains. Areas of the review should focus on environmental and
equity perspectives. Of particular interest is whether other cities recover specific
benefits of removing vacant property from the floodplain from landowners. Should
the City allow development within the floodplain? How does this promote the
objectives of other City programs, especially Natural Areas, Transportation, and
Water Quality as well as health and safety?
8. Enhance the Environmental Ethos of the City. Is the City doing all it can to ensure
that the capital projects result in true environmental enhancements? The stormwater
program should emphasize stormwater best practices and Low Impact Development
(LID) to protect water quality. How does Fort Collins compare to other cities with
respect to water quality treatment systems? Other innovations, such as a "rain barrel"
approach to capture stormwater for irrigation purposes, which might require a change
in state law, should be considered.
Council specifically requested staff prepare additional information on program finance and water
quality and environmental management. Council requested the following specific information:
• How does Fort Collins compare to like municipalities with respect to rates, rate
structure, level of protection and the additional items covered in the Black and
Veatch Stormwater Utility Survey?
■ What is the condition of the stormwater infrastructure?
What is the status of the debt of the stormwater utility? What could be gained if
the Utility paid off or refinanced current bonds?
What impact[s] do publicly owned lands, such as roads, parks, school districts,
CSU, etc. have on the overall system? What fees do they pay?
2
City of
,,-F6rt Coltins
• What is the result of water quality monitoring? Report on the water quality
monitoring and the health of the streams and provide the report on an annual
basis.
• What water quality best management practices are in place today? What more
can be done?
Staff will prepare an outline and course of action to address the materials requested, prepare
alternatives and staff recommendations for presentation at future work sessions, and final council
consideration by the end of March, 2009.
City of
F6rt Collins
Memorandum
DT: October 15, 2008
TO: City Council
TH: Darin Atteberry, City Manager -atfs '
Diane Jones, Deputy City Manager.
Jeff Scheick, Planning, Development & Transportation Director
FM: Joe Frank, Advance Planning Director
Christina Vincent, URA City Planner
Advance Planning
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6376
970.224.6111 -tax
fcgov. corn/advanceplanning
RE: October 14, 2008 Prospect South Urban Renewal Plan — Work Session Summary
Council Members Present:
Doug Hutchinson, Mayor
Kelly Ohlson, Mayor Pro-Tem
David Roy
Ben Manvel
Lisa Poppaw
Diggs Brown
Work Session Participants:
Jeff Scheick, PDT Director
Joe Frank, Advance Planning Director, URA Program Manager
Christina Vincent, URA City Planner
Direction Soueht/Ouestions to be Answered:
Does the Council have any questions regarding establishing an Urban Renewal Plan for
the Prospect South area?
2. Does the Council agree there is sufficient reason to bring forward for adoption an Urban
Renewal Plan for the Prospect South area?
Council's Direction:
City of
Fort
Collins
• Council wanted to know more about the road infrastructure costs associated with
improvements on College Avenue within the plan area, especially the intersection of
College and Prospect. In addition, Council requested to know what the commitment of
the URA is to improving the streets and railroad by including them in the plan area.
• Council wants to be informed on the Stormwater practices the developer intends to take
regarding the existing floodplain on the Capstone site.
• Council requested clarification of the TIF on school district funding applicable in Urban
Renewal areas.
• Council would like clarification on the plan for preservation of the existing trees on the
Capstone site.
• All members of the Council present are ready to continue the process of establishing an
Urban Renewal Plan for the Prospect South area.