Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWORK SESSION SUMMARY-02/13/2024-Work SessionCity Manager’s Office
300 Laporte Ave
PO Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522
970-221-6684
rvenkatesh@fcgov.com
MEMORANDUM
Date: February 22, 2024
To: Mayor and City Councilmembers
Through: Kelly DiMartino, City Manager
From: Rupa Venkatesh, Assistant City Manager
Subject: Feb. 13, 2024 Work Session Summary: Council Priority Setting Session #2
BOTTOM LINE
The purpose of this memo is to document the summary of discussions during the Feb. 13 Work
Session. Mayor Arndt, Mayor Pro Tem Francis and Councilmembers Gutowsky, Pignataro,
Canonico, and Potyondy were present in person. Councilmember Ohlson participated remotely.
DISCUSSON SUMMARY
Staff provided Council a high-level overview of the process utilized during the Council Retreat
on Jan. 27 which resulted in proposed priority titles and problem/definition statements. Council
provided feedback on staff’s framing of the proposed priorities. Questions were raised how
individual inputs would be tracked and it was clarified that Council would first be approving the
priority titles and definition statements. Once approved, staff will schedule work sessions as
needed with Council regarding specific actions to achieve these priorities.
Council requested that consideration of the approved priorities be brought forward sooner than
March 19 and there was consensus to consider each proposed priority with a separate
resolution.
NEXT STEPS
The proposed priority titles and definition statements will be revised based on Council feedback
received. Council will consider adoption of priorities during a Council adjourned meeting on
Feb. 27, 2024. Staff will have further discussion with Council on how to accomplish approved
priorities during subsequent work sessions. In addition, Council will receive a memo concerning
the bike rack items at a later time.
FOLLOW-UP ITEMS
During the Council retreat, one Councilmember provided the input “improve access to give
charitably)” under the human and social health proposed priority that was left off the proposed
DocuSign Envelope ID: FE441773-DA32-4307-8D53-3C5E0D272395
Council priorities table that was provided as an attachment to this item. It will be added as an
input” that staff may consider. Should the proposed priority, “Improve Human and Social Health
for Vulnerable Populations” be approved by Council, staff will have further discussion with
Council on how to achieve this priority.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FE441773-DA32-4307-8D53-3C5E0D272395
City Manager’s Office
City Hall
300 LaPorte Ave.
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6505
970.224.6107 - fax
fcgov.com
WORK SESSION MEMORANDUM
Date: February 20, 2024
To: Mayor and City Councilmembers
Through: Kelly DiMartino, City Manager
Tyler Marr, Deputy City Manager
From: Travis Storin, Chief Financial Officer
Ginny Sawyer, Project & Policy Manager
Subject: Work Session Summery, February 13, 2024 – Tax Renewals
BOTTOM LINE
The purpose of this memo is to document the summary of discussions during the February 13, 2024
Work Session. All Councilmembers were present with Councilmember Olson attending remotely.
Staff provided context on current tax rates, historical dedicated sales tax measures, traditional uses of
both the Street Maintenance Program (SMP) ¼- cent and the Community Capital Improvement (CCIP)
cent tax. A timeline was outlined that included work sessions with the full Council in February, April,
June, and July with Council Finance Committee meetings scheduled in March and May. It was noted
that ballot adoption is scheduled for August 20.
Referring these renewals in 2024 allows an additional ballot cycle prior to expiration should either not
be renewed.
DISCUSSION SUMMARY
Main discussion points and questions included:
Could we/should we consider running the SMP tax for a longer term. General consensus was
that this may make sense since road maintenance is an on-going need. A gap in funding was
noted but extending the term of the tax may be more acceptable than increasing the amount of
the tax.
Continued encouragement to leverage our dollars as much as possible against federal grants
and other monies.
Clarification was provided on what may fall under the new 2050 tax as opposed to the CCIP tax.
Staff will pay attention to these as the project list evolves.
Question as to whether Council Priorities could be funded through these taxes: yes, Council
Priorities can be put forward in the CCIP package. Moreover, it is important to note that these
renewals would not be in place until 2026 should they be renewed.
Questions and suggestions were made regarding annexed areas of the City and possible
deficiencies in transportation infrastructure that might be addressed.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 44544D9B-5557-44C4-BC14-5CF6C4365CDD
2
NEXT STEPS
There was support for the engagement and timeline presented. Council Finance Committee will
continue the conversation in March and the item will be back to the full Council on April 23, 2024.
FOLLOW-UP ITEMS
There was a question regarding annexed streets that are below City standards. The cost estimates
provided in the Tax Renewal presentation to maintain a Level of Service B Pavement Condition do not
include anticipated maintenance costs of annexed streets. Staff is preparing a more detailed memo
about the maintenance level and condition of annexed streets. This memo will include the policy
regarding accepting annexed roads for City maintenance.
There was a request for a memo to outline lessons learned from previous tax initiatives. Staff will
provide this in the next few weeks.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 44544D9B-5557-44C4-BC14-5CF6C4365CDD
Utilities
electric · stormwater · wastewater · water
222 Laporte Ave.
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
970.212.2900
V/TDD: 711
utilities@fcgov.com
fcgov.com/utilities
WORK SESSION MEMORANDUM
Date: February 19, 2024
To: Mayor and City Councilmembers
Through: Kelly DiMartino, City Manager
Tyler Marr, Deputy City Manager/Interim Utilities Executive Director
From: Alice Conovitz, Utilities Water Conservation Specialist
Mariel Miller, Utilities Water Conservation Manager
Subject: February 13, 2024, Work Session Summary: 2024 Water Efficiency Plan Status
BOTTOM LINE
The purpose of this memo is to document the summary of discussions during the February 13,
2024, Work Session. All Councilmembers were present (Councilmember Ohlson attended
remotely). Staff members present were Mariel Miller, Alice Conovitz, and Gretchen Stanford.
Staff member Donnie Dustin attended remotely.
The purpose of this item was to describe the state-mandated Fort Collins Utilities (Utilities)
Water Efficiency Plan (WEP) and the 2024 update process. The updated WEP will set
conservation goals, incorporate extensive public engagement focusing on marginalized
community members, and employ numeric modeling and an equity analysis to help prioritize
future water conservation and efficiency strategies. Potential strategies include rate structures,
education, voluntary incentives, regulations, and standards. The staff presentation and Agenda
Item Summary also provided background on water conservation and efficiency and Utilities’
work to manage water demand to provide a reliable water supply. Staff sought input from
Council on the following two questions:
1. What is Council’s vision for the Water Efficiency Plan and how it addresses water
conservation and efficiency?
2. What does Council need to know from our engagement, equity, analysis, and water
demand modeling efforts?
DISCUSSION SUMMARY
Council provided feedback and comments, including the following (Council-requested follow-up
items are listed separately):
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1BDEA3F2-75AB-4AC8-9234-DD0F0FB42ACC
Providing input on a plan that doesn’t extend to all of Fort Collins, but only to the Utilities
Water Service Area is challenging. Council asked about neighboring water providers’
WEPs and whether they were available to review. Generally, these can be found online
either through the Colorado Water Conservation Board or the specific water providers’
websites.
Better understanding of water use based on housing type is helpful for understanding
and making development decisions.
Utilities is pursuing multiple strategies, especially adequate water storage and
conservation/efficiency, to prepare for climate change and its impacts.
It would be helpful to know how we’re doing, and to inform the development of future
goals, if we could easily compare Fort Collins Utilities water service area’s water use to
other communities or had some sort of benchmark. Staff responded that we could
provide some examples, and acknowledged that gallons per capita, per day (GCPD) is a
challenging metric to use for comparisons because it is not measured consistently
amongst water providers. GPCD metrics for residential and commercial uses can also
be challenging to understand and compare.
The total estimated annual water savings in 2022 seems small, at about 2.5% of our
total treated water. However, staff clarified that this volume includes the savings from
about only 16 programs and services that are quantifiable – the Water Conservation
Department also implements activities such as education that likely provide water
savings but are challenging to measure. The annual savings estimation is also not
cumulative, but only a snapshot of new savings initiated each year. Many programs,
such as converting to a water-wise landscape, have ongoing year-after-year savings that
are not included in the annual savings estimate.
Staff responded to other questions that were asked about working with school-aged
children, businesses, the volume of Halligan Reservoir and location of additional Utilities
water storage.
Council liked the community-outreach approach, but questions how staff will reach
marginalized community members in a meaningful way given challenges and over-
surveying concerns. Staff will emphasize listening and will work with contracted equity
consultants, experienced internal staff, and compensated community consultants who
are well connected to various groups in the community and can tailor the engagement to
what works best for a particular group.
Utilities’ current tiered pricing structure could be re-evaluated as a conservation strategy.
When prioritizing strategies and weighing decisions, it is helpful to understand the impact
on equity and potential benefits, similar to how Our Climate Future evaluates next
moves.
Council asked about what prompted the work and when it will be complete. Staff
responded that the plan is state-mandated and is required to be updated every seven
years, with an estimated completion date of Dec. 2024. A plan with a clearer path
forward that includes updated goals and prioritized strategies is needed for Utilities and
Water Conservation staff to address future risks such as climate change more
strategically.
Concerns regarding impacts to revenue were shared and are being addressed by staff;
however, the revenue impact is minimized by the base rate and could be further
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1BDEA3F2-75AB-4AC8-9234-DD0F0FB42ACC
addressed through adjustments to the current tiered rate pricing structure to limit impacts
to low water users.
One councilmember mentioned a vision for the WEP to be comfortable, but ambitious, in
setting goals and identifying strategies.
NEXT STEPS
Staff will respond to the follow-up items listed below in a separate memo expected in March.
Other next steps include continuing engagement activities with the public and other staff to
inform the WEP planning process through Q3 2024 and finalizing the water demand estimation
model. A second work session is currently planned with Council for July 9, 2024, to provide an
update on the planning process and seek further direction.
FOLLOW-UP ITEMS
The following items, requested by Council, will be addressed in a separate follow-up memo:
Per unit water use (indoor and outdoor) by housing type
Neighboring water providers’ WEPs
Comparisons to other communities’ GCPD, separating residential and commercial,
where feasible; and evaluate why there are differences, to better understand and learn
from others who are doing it well.
Utilities water rate comparisons across various customer types, to evaluate industry
rates.
Water savings associated with xeriscape standards.
CC: Gretchen Stanford, Utilities Deputy Director Customer Connection
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1BDEA3F2-75AB-4AC8-9234-DD0F0FB42ACC
Utilities
222 Laporte Ave.
PO Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522
WORK SESSION MEMORANDUM
Date: March 25, 2024
To: Mayor and City Councilmembers
Through: Kelly DiMartino, City Manager
Tyler Marr, Deputy City Manager/Interim Utilities Executive Director
Gretchen Stanford, Utilities Deputy Director Customer Connections
From: Alice Conovitz, Utilities Water Conservation Specialist
Mariel Miller, Utilities Water Conservation Manager
Subject: Follow-up to Feb. 13, 2024 Work Session: 2024 Water Efficiency Plan Status
BOTTOM LINE
The purpose of this memo is to provide follow-up information in response to questions raised
during the Feb. 13, 2024 Work Session on the 2024 Water Efficiency Plan (WEP). All
Councilmembers were present with Councilmember Ohlson attending remotely. A summary of
the discussion was documented in a Work Session Memorandum dated Feb. 19, 2024 with
subject line, “February 13, 2024 Work Session Summary: 2024 Water Efficiency Plan Status”.
The purpose was to describe the state-mandated Fort Collins Utilities (Utilities) WEP and the
2024 update process. The 2024 WEP will set conservation goals, incorporate extensive public
engagement focusing on marginalized community members, and employ numeric modeling and
an equity analysis to help prioritize future water conservation and efficiency strategies. Potential
strategies include rate structures, education, voluntary incentives, regulations, and standards.
The staff presentation and Agenda Item Summary also provided background on water
conservation and efficiency and Utilities’ work to manage water demand to provide a reliable
water supply.
The following items, requested by Council, are addressed in this memo:
1. Per unit water residential water use by housing type.
2. Water Efficiency Plans for neighboring water providers.
3. Water use comparison to other communities.
4. Utilities water rate comparisons across customer types.
5. Water savings associated with xeriscape standards.
ITEM #1 – PER UNIT RESIDENTIAL WATER USE BY HOUSING TYPE
Average annual water use per unit is greatest for single-family customers, who used
approximately 78,600 gallons per housing unit on average, as shown below on the plot. The
amount of water use per unit is similar between duplex and multi-family customers, averaging
approximately 46,300 gallons per unit and 44,400 gallons per unit, respectively. On an average
per-unit basis, seasonal outdoor uses account for 49% of single-family residential water use, but
DocuSign Envelope ID: D0367C25-3A86-4D4C-A9C0-D60623CA6968
only 33% for duplex and 21% for multi-family residential customers. These patterns reflect the
generally higher amount of irrigated outdoor landscapes associated with single-family and
duplex residential accounts0F1. Additionally, the average number of people per household (pph)
varies across housing types, which primarily influences indoor use. We estimate the average
occupancy per unit is 2.6 persons per household (pph) for single-family residential, 2.2 pph for
duplex, and 1.6 pph for multi-family residential, based on analysis of 2021 U.S. Census Bureau
data for the entire city of Fort Collins.
ITEM #2 – WATER EFFICIENCY PLANS FOR NEIGHBHORING WATER PROVIDERS
Within the city of Fort Collins’ growth management area, Utilities, East Larimer County (ELCO),
and Fort Collins-Loveland Water District (FCLWD) each must submit water efficiency plans1F2.
The following bullets summarize key information about these plans:
Utilities: Update is underway with intent to submit update to CWCB in late 2024. The
current WEP was completed in 2015 and is available at https://www.fcgov.com/WEP
o The current WEP sets a goal to reduce community-wide per capita water use to
130 gallons per capita per day by the year 2030; however, this goal is being re-
evaluated.
ELCO: The latest WEP was updated in 2016 and is available at
https://dnrweblink.state.co.us/CWCB/0/edoc/202185/ELCO_WEPlanUpdate2017.pdf?se
archid=1914c118-df55-45bf-a6c6-0c2e1ad3c877
o ELCOS’s WEP set a goal to reduce treated water demands by 740 acre feet per
year by 2035, as compared to predicted use based on passive water demand
1. For multi-family properties with large irrigated common areas, these may be billed at commercial rate codes. In
2023, annual water use was 21% lower than average for irrigation-only accounts, which includes commercial and
residential common areas.
2. The Water Conservation Act of 2004 (HB04-1365) requires all retail water providers that sell 2,000 acre-feet or
more annually to have a state-approved water efficiency plan.
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
Multi-family Duplex Single-family
Ga
l
l
o
n
s
Average Annual Water Use per Unit
2019 -2023)
Indoor Use Outdoor & Seasonal Uses
DocuSign Envelope ID: D0367C25-3A86-4D4C-A9C0-D60623CA6968
management.
FCLWD: The latest WEP was submitted in 2023 and is available at https://fclwd.com/wp-
content/uploads/2023/07/FCLWD-2023-Water-Efficiency-Plan-Update-for-Public-
Review-1-1.pdf
o FCLWD’s WEP set targeted water savings goals by customer class to lower the
treated water demand by 10% over the ten-year planning period, or by
approximately 1% per year.
Other water efficiency planning documents can be found on individual websites or the
searchable water conservation plan database
https://dnrweblink.state.co.us/CWCB/CustomSearch.aspx?SearchName=WaterConserverPlan
Search&cr=1 ) hosted by the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB), the state agency
that reviews and approves WEPs.
ITEM #3 – WATER USE COMPARISON TO OTHER COMMUNITIES
Gallons per capital per day (GPCD) is a common metric used by water providers to evaluate
water use independent of population growth. The calculation is typically done annually and can
measure total, residential or commercial GPCD. Annual GPCD is calculated as: volume of
annual water demand, divided by population served, divided by number of days in a year.
GPCD is not typically weather-normalized, which means it will vary across years and climates.
Even in areas with similar climates there is variability in the methodology used to calculate
GPCD, making it challenging to use as a comparison tool between water providers. The
variability or differences happen in the first two values of the equation – volume of water and
population. Variations in how water providers define volume of water include total treated water,
total billed consumption, total metered consumption, inclusion of untreated water, and
inclusion/exclusion of large contractual deliveries to commercial customers. Population
estimates can also vary based on data availability and population estimate methods. These
inconsistencies all influence GPCD and should be considered when comparing GPCD between
water providers. However, if using GPCD to compare, the best option is to use residential
GPCD and highlight the differences in the data used.
The final estimation of Utilities’ 2023 water demand is 122 GPCD (this is lower than the
preliminary estimate presented at the Feb. 13, 2024 Council Work Session, which was initially
estimated at 132 GPCD). This is a decrease of 12% from the 2022 demand of 139 GPCD. The
drop in GPCD is due to a 123% increase in precipitation during irrigation months compared to
prior years. Customers responded to the weather and reduced their outdoor use, but 2023’s low
GPCD is not likely to persist during drier or hotter years.
Staff researched others’ historical GPCD from current WEPs and discussed GPCD in more
depth with three other water providers who responded to a request for more information. A few
providers we researched and contacted are using GPCD as a performance metric or goal in
their WEPs and many consider it a poor tool for comparison purposes, especially when
commercial use is included. Some providers were reluctant to provide their numbers. The plots
below present GPCD for residential use (upper plot) for those water providers and years that
residential-only data was available, and total use (lower plot; total GPCD includes both
residential and commercial use) for those that did not have residential data available. (For total
DocuSign Envelope ID: D0367C25-3A86-4D4C-A9C0-D60623CA6968
GPCD, calculation variabilities include those described above, as well as the use of raw water,
excluding large industrial water use from total GPCD and differences in the amount of
commercial water use versus residential use – some communities have relatively very little
commercial use.)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total GPCD by Year
includes residential and commercial uses)
Fort Collins Utilities Aurora Castle Rock
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Residential GPCD by Year
excludes commercial use)
Fort Collins Utilities Fort Collins-Loveland Water District
East Larimer Co Water District Westminster
Greeley
DocuSign Envelope ID: D0367C25-3A86-4D4C-A9C0-D60623CA6968
Staff recommends moving away from a GPCD goal in the updated WEP as a publicly facing
metric, given its complexity and variability. It’s likely Utilities would continue to track GPCD
internally to monitor for trends. A better goal or performance metric may be volume of water
treated and/or metered, or volume of water reduced over a given period. A simplified volume-
based metric, such as a reduction in total water use or estimated water savings, would align
better to predicted and estimated water savings from conservation and efficiency strategies,
which are also expressed as volumes. A simplified metric would minimize public confusion
about what GPCD means and its nuances.
ITEM #4 – UTILITIES WATER RATES COMPARISONS ACROSS CUSTOMER TYPES
Utilities is committed to delivering safe, reliable and competitively priced services for all
customers. Single-family and duplex water rates have a base charge and three tiers, with
increasing costs-per-gallon as use goes up. Multi-family residential and commercial customers
have lower rates in winter. Commercial rates are based, in part, on tap size. Current Utilities’
water rates for all customer types are available online at
https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/water-wastewater-and-stormwater-
rates.pdf?1704235735.2F3
Utilities’ residential water rates are similar to, or lower than, neighboring municipalities, as
shown in the following table:
2024 Residential Average Monthly Utility Bill
Utility Electric Water Wastewater Stormwater Total
Fort Collins Utilities $ 88.41 $ 53.04 $ 37.04 $ 23.09 $ 201.58
Longmont $ 82.56 $ 69.33 $ 41.33 $ 18.85 $ 212.07
Loveland $ 89.76 $ 61.16 $ 43.04 $ 24.88 $ 218.84
Greeley $ 100.63 $ 73.90 $ 36.99 $ 18.61 $ 230.13
Colorado Springs $ 99.92 $ 96.95 $ 30.53 n/a $ 227.40
Boulder $ 100.63 $ 66.72 $ 48.43 $ 27.10 $ 242.89
ELCO n/a $ 58.24 n/a n/a n/a
FCLWD n/a $ 61.93 n/a n/a n/a
ITEM #5 – WATER SAVINGS ASSOCIATED WITH XERISCAPE STANDARDS
A well-managed landscape built with xeriscape principles – one of which is limiting turf – can
yield significant water savings when compared to typical turf-heavy landscapes. Water use data
for participants in the Utilities Xeriscape Incentive Program (XIP) show that limiting high-water
turf reduced water use by an average of seven gallons per square foot per year for areas
converted from turfgrass to xeriscape, or about 60% less water.
3 Detailed water rate information for FCLWD is available online at https://fclwd.com/support/rates-and-fees/.
ELCO’s water rates are available at https://www.elcowater.org/rate-information.
DocuSign Envelope ID: D0367C25-3A86-4D4C-A9C0-D60623CA6968
Turf replacement programs like XIP and development landscape standards reduce current and
future water demands. Staff scheduled a hearing in May 2024 for code changes that propose
new standards that prioritize water-wise landscapes. If adopted, these new standards would
apply to commercial and multi-family development and redevelopment, which include large
common areas like those maintained by homeowners’ associations. To reduce outdoor water
demand, staff will propose that no more than 30% of the total landscaped area (not to exceed
10,000 square feet) in new and redeveloped commercial and multi-family properties be planted
with high-water turfgrass species.
Using the criteria of the proposed standard, staff analyzed property and water use data, and
several development scenario assumptions. Staff estimate the proposed standard would save at
least 53 million gallons annually on multi-family properties alone at GMA build-out compared to
no turf limitations. If adopted, the portion of water savings associated with new and
redevelopment in the Utilities water service area could help make progress towards a future
WEP goal.
Given the variability of business types and unpredictability of future development trends, non-
residential commercial property water reduction estimates are more difficult to capture and
therefore were not included. It is assumed that if the new standards are adopted, commercial
landscapes would achieve a 60% reduction in future water use compared to water use trends
seen with current landscapes. The Urban Landscape Conservation Task Force reiterates this
challenge in their final report published in Jan. 2024, pointing out the many factors that make
predicting water savings for regulations so difficult. Regardless, there is consensus amongst
task force and water conservation professionals state and national that one effective way to
reduce water use is to reduce new turf installation.3F4 City staff anticipate the water demand
model that is being developed for the WEP update to be able to provide more comprehensive
water demand estimates for this and other strategies.
NEXT STEPS
Staff will continue to work on the WEP update. Ongoing and upcoming actions include
continuing engagement activities with the public and staff to inform the planning process and
finalizing the water demand estimation model. A second Council Work Session is currently
planned for July 9, 2024, to provide an update on the planning process and seek further
direction.
Attachments:
1. Work Session Memorandum: February 13, 2024 Work Session Summary: 2024 Water
Efficiency Plan Status
2. Work Session Agenda Item Summary: 2024 Water Efficiency Plan Status
3. 2024 Urban Landscape Conservation Task Force Final Report
CC: Gretchen Stanford, Utilities Deputy Director Customer Connections
4 2024 Urban Landscape Conservation Task Force Final Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: D0367C25-3A86-4D4C-A9C0-D60623CA6968