HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Legislative Review Committee - 01/28/1994 -r
HPDesk Local Print for Molly DAVIS
Start of Item 2.
Subject:LRC MEETING MINUTES
Creator:Andrea RIEGER /CFC/Ol Dated:02/07/94 at 1612.
LEGISLATIVE REVIEW COMMITTEE
JANUARY 28,1994
Present:
Ann Azari
Jerry P.Brown
Susanne Edminster
Stewart Ellenberg
Dave Feldman
Torn Gallier
Alan Krcmarik
Bob Nastan
Mike Pretz
Andrea Rieger
Tom Shoemaker
Meeting called to order at 12:00.Since there wasn’t a quorum,all
recommended actions will be re—confirmed via hpdesk with the other
LRC members.
1.Water Issues
SJR 6 —The Colorado Water and Power Authority SRF loan list
would establish the state revolving loan fund authorizations.The
City may have an interest in remaining on this list —funding could
be used for our water meter program.No action needed at this
point.We may want to support.
SB 56 —Would change the Denver Water board composition.There
would be no effect on us.Recommended position —neutral.
HE 1006 —Administration of interstate diversions.This is Rep.
Jerke’s good faith effort to resolve potential legal/constitutional
problems with existing interstate compact language.However,this
bill as written would expedite Western slope water exportation
projects.There is a lot of opposition to this bill,and the City
may need to oppose on short notice,since this could negatively
impact some of our transbasin water rights.(A phone poll of LRC
members will be conducted,if necessary.)
Federal Bypass issue —We gave some comments to the Forest Service
at a public meeting on Thursday,1/27.The Forest Service has
granted an extension on the permits to July 31,and we are working
on an agreement in the interim.
Ann Azari wants to be kept up to speed on this issue,so that she
can help mobilize support,if necessary.She mentioned that she is
working with Steve Roy on a joint resolution with Greeley and
Loveland.She has a concern about the seeming lack of
understanding by the Fish and Wildlife Department on the potential
impact of flow restrictions/changes on Colorado communities.She
has spoken to Rep.Allard about her concern.
SB 95 —Basin of Origin bill -As drafted,the bill requires a
nearly impossible burden of proof that the applicant has analyzed
every conceivable alternative to the project.This would tie up
any transbasin water project for years,and could essentially
prohibit them.The bill would apply to Fort Collins’conditional
rights for the Michigan Ditch enlargement,and to any of the City’s
other transbasin diversions.Recommend that we oppose.Would like
to send letters.May need to testify.Electronic updates will be
forthcoming.
2.Financial Issues
SB 69 —Continues to have a favorable interpretation of real
property —a definition that would exclude government owned
property.Passed Senate on second reading Friday,1/21,and is now
in the House.We will continue to monitor.
SB 22 —Bill on the State Division of Securities.We are neutral
on this bill.If anything,it is favorable to us.
Resolution 1009 on Public—Private Cooperation is a resolution
drafted by CML and CAd.It states that governments should work in
cooperation with their business community for the good of the whole
community,but leaves privatization decisions to the local
government.House Local Government adopted on Wednesday.
Weld County Court Decision -District Court handed down a decision
that Weld County could return their social services programs which
were mandated by the state,but not fully funded by the state,back
to the state.
3.Police Issues
There are four bills on concealed weapons —HB 1025,1076 and SB 27
and 90.HB 1025 has had numerous amendments.Would like to send
the draft letter included in your packet opposing these bills to
our state legislators.Since 1921,the authority for issuing
concealed weapons permits has rested with the local police and/or
sheriff.All of these bills take away this discretion and require
a permit to be issued,if applicant meets certain criteria.A
couple of the bills require the applicant to take a Hunter’s Safety
Course —but this type of course does not prepare one to carry a
concealed weapon and decide when or if to use deadly force.Phone
calls may be appropriate at some point.
4.Natural Resources
SB 86 would disallow municipalities from using their billing
authority so that they could bill for municipal trash service.CML
is working on a compromise which would allow local governments to
retain their billing authority.This compromise would require Fort
Collins to go through a competitive bidding (proposal)process,
should we ever state to provide municipal trash service.Sounds
like a workable compromise.Tom Shoemaker to double check with
CML.
fiB 1168 Would preempt local control on the labeling of agricultural
chemicals.If this only applies to the label,it should be o.k.
Tom Shoemaker will re—confirm.
5.other Business
Worker’s Compensation —Recently,a four—person panel was convened
to discuss worker’s compensation issues in eight identified areas.
Two members of this panel represent labor,and two represent
employers.One of the stated goals is not to increase the overall
cost of worker’s compensation.If all goes well,the panel may
also make recommendations on outstanding ballot initiatives.
Poudre Fire Authority is working with Peggy Reeves on some
legislation that would change the investment caps on the Police and
fire pension funds.Currently,50%of investments must be invested
conservatively.This legislation would lower this percentage.
There is a ballot initiative titled the “94 Consumer Protection
Act”.An alternate,and perhaps more accurate,title would be “A
Proposal Concerning Government Service and Lobbying Activities”.
This ballot initiative has been introduced by Mr.Rick Grice and
Dennis Polhill.Briefly,it would apply to all governments and
government employees,and would restrict government activity for
which there is a realistic private provider.It would prohibit all
public funding of lobbying.No government business activity would
be exempt from any law or regulation that applies to private
industry.There would be no limitation on liability for
governments,but no exemptions from tax.However,schools (K—12),
law enforcement,public health agencies and those agencies who
services are directly related to public safety are exempt.There
is a hearing on the title of this ballot initiative on Feb.2 at
2:00 for the Legislative Council.We do not believe that public
comment will be accepted at that time.
Next LRC meeting:February 11,1994 —12:00.
Adjourned 1:15.
End of Item 2.