HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Full - Election Code Committee - 02/28/2022 -
City Clerk
300 LaPorte Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6515
970.221-6295 - fax
fcgov.com/cityclerk
AGENDA
City Council Election Code Committee
February 28, 2022, 12:00-1:30 p.m.
Remote Participation available
Public Participation Options:
Watch the Meeting: Anyone can view the Election Code
Committee (ECC) meeting live:
Join Zoom Meeting
https://fcgov.zoom.us/j/93910757534
Meeting ID: 939 1075 7534
Public Comment: Individuals who wish to address the
Committee via remote public participation can do so
through the link provided above.
The meeting will be available beginning at 11:30 a.m.
Monday. To participate:
•You need to have a laptop or computer with a
microphone and/or headset that includes a
microphone.
•You need to have access to the internet.
•Join the Zoom meeting listed above.
•Keep yourself on muted status.
Note:
•If you are unable to participate via Zoom, you may
attend the meeting in person (however, we have
very limited capacity based on social distancing
recommendations).
•Alternatively, you may provide comments to the
Committee via email prior to 11:30 a.m. at
cityleaders@fcgov.com. Emails will be
read by City Leaders; however, not read into the
formal meeting record.
Committee Members: Mayor Jeni Arndt – Vice Chair
Councilmember Tricia Canonico, District 3 - Chair
Councilmember Kelly Ohlson, District 5
Councilmember Julie Pignataro, District 2 (alternate)
2021-2022
Main Topics of Discussion in
Priority Order
1)Redistricting
2)Campaign Finance
Provisions
3)November Elections
4)RCV
5)Public Financing of Elections
6)Election Oversight Board
7)Partisan/Non-Partisan
Elections
1. Call Meeting to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Public Comment - 30 minutes total (limited to 5 minutes per speaker max)
4. Public Comment Follow-up
5. Consideration and approval of the January 10, 2022, Committee Meeting Minutes
6. Redistricting Update:
• Staff (Tim Morales) assigned to work on this project.
• Currently researching the Census data and will verify that all necessary data is present before
starting this project.
• Received the County redistricting information on 2/7/2022
• Spreadsheet (Developed in house) to determine the deviation of the precincts will be updated
(work in progress).
• GIS will then develop different options that will bring the city within the acceptable
deviation. These options will take time to develop, produce and document. The estimate to
create these options is a couple of weeks.
7. Election Timing & Administration Options Discussion
• Consideration of Potential Committee Recommendations
a. Timing of regular elections
b. Ranked choice voting
c. Transitions needed to terms
8. Scope of Work Session Discussion on potential ballot questions, and direction for staff
• Does timing work to hold the work session on March 22, 2022?
• What questions should be posed during work session?
9. Campaign Finance comparison to state law
10. Proposed timeline:
• ECC February meeting Campaign Finance Discussion; Discussion of timing & plan for
work on remaining priorities.
• March 22, 2022 Work Session – November Election Discussion & RCV
• March 2022 City Attorney’s Office drafts ballot language
• ECC March meeting Any follow-up prior to Work Session; additional Campaign
finance discussion; Review code language regarding timing of
redistricting.
• ECC April meeting Present ballot language to ECC regarding the move to
November Coordinated elections and RCV; Present Campaign
Finance Code Language
• May & June 2022 Present ballot language to Council; Call for Special Election;
Campaign finance amendments ordinance to Council
11. Future Election Code Committee dates with scheduling conflicts.
a. June 20, 2022 – Juneteenth / Rescheduled to June 27, 2022
b. Remote vs In-person discussion – Discussion around returning to all in-person
12. Other Business
13. Adjournment
ATTACHMENTS:
1) January 10, 2022, Committee Meeting Minutes
2) Presentation materials on election administration options and campaign finance comparisons
Next Election Code Committee Meeting: 12:00-1:30 p.m., March 21, 2022
Election Timing & Administration
Options
Dependencies, Advantages & Disadvantages for ECC Consideration
Election Code Committee Meeting 02/28/2022
Primary drivers to consider 2
•Voter participation
•Maximizing voter
turnout and
participation in
municipal races
•Costs
•Responsible and
effective use of
funding
•Professional administration
/ effective governance
•Confidence in results and
integrity of process
•Strong ability to be
responsive to voter needs
•Ability to fulfill election
responsibilities that cannot
be coordinated
Options with advantages and disadvantages
Timing Options for Regular
Elections
Comparison of primary considerations 4
•No change to current
election timing
•No impact to terms for
elected officials
•Administration continues
to be done at municipal
level for max local control
•RCV possible as soon as
April 2025
•Timing change allows
coordinated elections
administered by County
•Would require one-time
extensions to current
terms
•RCV possible as soon as
November 2023
•Timing change allows
coordinated elections
administered by County
•Existing terms would
require term adjustments
•RCV possible as soon as
November 24
April Odd Year (current)November Odd Year November Even Year*
April Mayor + 2,4,6 Mayor + 1,3,5 Mayor + 2,4,6
November Mayor + 2,4,6
(all terms
+7 months)
Mayor + 1,3,5
(terms except
mayor
+7 months)
Mayor + 2,4,6
Overview of potential future year elections –Odd years
*For potential implementation of RCV, election dates in green squares indicate possibility without significant
timing-based concerns
2023 2025 2027
Overview of potential future year elections -Even years
*For potential implementation of RCV, election dates in yellow squares may allow use of RCV with some
concerns, while green squares indicate possible to use RCV without significant timing-based concerns
2023 2024 2025 2026
November
April –
Mayor (to be elected
for 1 yr 7 mo term)
2,4,6 (3 yr 7 mo term)
Mayor (2 yr term)
1,3,5 (prior terms end
5 mo early, new 4 yr
terms)
No municipal election Mayor (2 yr term)
2,4,6 (4 yr terms)
November –
alt. Term
Option
No muncipal election
November -
Mayor + 2,4,6 (current
terms extended 1 y
7m)
No municipal election
November -
Mayor +1,3,5 (current
Council terms
extended 1 y 7 m)
November
non-Pres.
only
April –
Mayor + 2,4,6
(to be elected for 3 y 7
m terms)
No municipal election
April –
1,3,5
(to be elected for 1 y 7
m terms)
November –
All
(4-year terms)
7Potential RCV implementation
April City 2025 Tabulation
Process for
RCVNov Odd SOS + County 2023
Nov Even SOS + County 2024
April City 2025 Administrative
Rules for RCVNov Odd SOS 2023
Nov Even SOS 2024
April City 2025 Developing
VOE for RCVNov Odd County 2023
Nov Even County 2024
April City 2025 Equipment for
RCVNov Odd County w/SOS 2023?
Nov Even County w/SOS 2024
April NA NA Post Election
verification for
RCVNov Odd County 2025
Nov Even County 2024?
Chart of
responsible
parties for
different
aspects of
RCV
implementation
with likely
potential timing
for each
element in
different
election timing
scenarios
8Ballot Content
April Elections (now)
•Mayor
•Councilmembers
•Possible questions
November Odd Year
•School Board
•Possible questions
•Judicial contests
November Even Year
•President/every 4 years
•US Representative
•US Senator (2 staggered,
every 6 years each)
•State offices every 4 years,
opposite President
•County offices
•Possible Questions
•Judicial contests
•Timing unfamiliar to some
voters
•Requires maintaining
sufficient local level
resources for effectively
carrying out elections
•For RCV, timelines for
certifying election may need
to be adjusted
•Risk limiting audits not done
post-election
April odd year elections (Current model)
Advantages
•Most expansive local control over process, especially for RCV
•Voter education
•Ballot design
•Provisions around tabulation and administrative procedures
•Equipment usage and availability of in person voting options
•No impact to terms
•Focus is on municipal races
Disadvantages
November Odd Year Elections
Advantages Disadvantages
•Requires adjustments to
current terms
•Lower overall turnout than
even years
•Limits City readiness for
special elections that cannot
be coordinated
•For RCV in particular,limited
ability for local determination
of procedures and
administrative provisions
•Same ballot as school board
for primary focus on local
contests
•Coordinated elections allow
County expertise in
administration
•Full UOCAVA procedures
used
•Post-election risk limiting
audit performed
•Typically higher turnout elections
•Greater overall focus on elections across
the community
November Even Year Elections
Advantages Disadvantages
•Additional ballot content would likely require
multiple ballot cards
•Potential for ballot drop off before municipal
contests, especially if on a separate ballot card
•Electorate different in presidential and non-
presidential years, potentially creating divides in
the districts based on which year on the ballot
•If using RCV, mixed ballot styles with multiple
sets of instructions required is not voter friendly
•Potential increased costs for campaigning and
gaining voter attention
•Longer lead time to implement new cadence
•If using RCV, more challenging to implement a
new voting method in a presidential election
•Limits City readiness for special elections which
cannot be coordinated
•Consistent electorate
•Still potential for higher overall
level of turnout on average than
odd years
•Potential to reduce costs by
doing elections every 4 years
instead of 2
November Even Year Elections –non-Presidential years only
Advantages Disadvantages
•If using RCV, mixed ballot styles with multiple sets of instructions required is not voter friendly
•Requires changing existing terms to get on new cycle
•Requires potential ongoing change to mayoral term length
•Entire Council up for election at same time
All Elections
•Costs
•Swearing in date
•Equipment needs
•Election readiness
•Ballot content as primary
driver of turnout
RCV Elections
•Post election tabulation and
certification timing
•Voter education options and
responsibility
•Ballot layout
•Use of equipment
•Post election audit potential
November Elections
•Ballot length and number of
ballot cards
•No control over costs to be
allocated in a coordinated
election –challenges in
budgeting
Variable Factors
Unknowns
Increasing voter turnout
•Turnout is driven by ballot content over all
other factors
•Some non-coordinated special
elections in Fort Collins have had
turnout of nearly 65%
Two municipalities in Douglas County have
shifted to even year November elections –
Parker and Castle Rock.
Available data indicates ballot drop off of 10
points in many precincts, with differentials as
high as 20 points,for participation in municipal
contests versus races at the top of the ballot.
14
Running for Office in November
Timing shifts
•Time for circulating nomination petitions
shifts from 70-49 days prior to Election Day
to 91-71 days prior to Election Day
•Deadline to withdraw from nomination shifts
from 42 days to 63 days prior to the election
•All ballot content must be finalized and
certified 60 days prior to a coord.election
Costs
•Potential increased costs to campaign in a
more crowded election –especially
Presidential election years –and challenge
in gaining airtime
15
Voter education, administrative determinations and ballot style
Ranked-choice voting
considerations
RCV and Voter Education 17
C.R.S. 1-7-118 (1) … the
agreement between the
county clerk and recorder
and the municipality must
include a plan for
conducting the voter
education campaign
required by section 1-7-
1003 (5)(b).
•Any implementation of ranked-choice
voting will include an additional investment
in voter education.
•The County may play a role in this for
coordinated elections and charge the City.
•The City will likely be directly involved
in voter education as well.
•Examples from other jurisdictions on voter
education efforts centered around RCV.
18Voter outreach and education campaigns
RCV Factors to Consider 19
•Will voters have options to be
notified of ballot errors?
Requires in person voting
options using equipment.
•Paid postage for ballots (in
any election) –not possible
in coordinated elections.
•Voting locations and timing
available for in person voters.
•Determining voter intent
in different scenarios
involving over votes or
under votes.
•Batch elimination of non-
viable candidates.
•Use of equipment for
tabulation.
•Manual tabulation
alternatives.
•Recount scope and cost if
required.
Voting Options Rules and Procedures Tabulation and Certification
Layout needs and considerations
Example Ballot Styles
21Sample All RCV Ballot
22Sample RCV Ballots with 6+ rankings
23Mixed Style Ballot Design
Councilmember
QUESTIONS?
Campaign Finance
Comparison to State Law for ECC Consideration
Election Code Committee Meeting 02/28/2022
Fort Collins City Code Provisions Relating to Campaign Finance
Overview of local campaign finance requirements that
are significantly different than State Law
•Earlier timing required for registration for Candidate
Committees
•Greater number of reports required during election
cycle
•Imposes contribution limits for municipal candidates
•Independent expenditures allowed for a wider range of
purposes, with reporting required at a lower threshold
•Imposes "Paid for by" requirements on candidates and
committees
•Detailed complaint process for municipal campaign
finance matters that are not addressed at all in State
law
•Provides definitions for contributions and contributions
in kind in City Code, and more precisely defines
political committees
26
27Comparison Chart of City Code and State Campaign Finance Provisions
Fort Collins City Code State Law
Applies to Fort Collins candidates
and committees
Applies to State, RTD, County, School
Board, and Special District candidates
and associated committees
Defines contributions and
contributions in kind
Does not define contributions or
contributions in kind
Candidate filing requirements similar
to State law
Financial disclosure statement due at a
different time, and opportunity to cure a
missed filing is available
Candidate committees must register
before accepting contributions or
making expenditures
Candidate committees must register
when they receive a contribution or
make an expenditure
Campaign contributions limits apply
to municipal candidates
No mention of contribution limits to
municipal candidates
28Comparison Chart of City Code and State Campaign Finance Provisions
Fort Collins City Code State Law
Joint contributions require signature
of all persons on checks written on a
joint account; assumption is that
contributions are equally split among
the persons signing check unless
otherwise specified
Couples and joint account holders are
required to write separate checks and
note in memo space which person the
contribution is from
City requires all committees to keep
all records for one year following the
election or until the final disposition
of a complaint, whichever is longer
Does not address recordkeeping
requirements
City requires 6 reports during
election cycle and annual reports
State law requires 3 reports and annual
reports
City accepts reports filed
electronically until midnight on date
due
State law requires filing by close of
business on date due
29Comparison Chart of City Code and State Campaign Finance Provisions
Fort Collins City Code State Law
Use of unexpended contributions
same as State law, except City allows
unexpended contributions to be
used to pay for the cost of a recount
requested by the candidate
No limits on the contribution of
unexpended funds to a political party
Does not specifically allow unexpended
contributions to be used to pay for a
request recount
Unexpended funds contributed to a
political party are subject to a limited
amount
30Comparison Chart of City Code and State Campaign Finance Provisions
Fort Collins City Code State Law
Independent expenditures can be
made to advocate the election,
defeat, or recall of a candidate.They
can also be made to support or
oppose a ballot issue or question.
Reporting is required once the
aggregate expenditure total is more
than $350.
FC does not require independent
expenditure committees
Independent expenditures are limited to
candidate races only.
Reporting is required when donations
accepted or expenditures reach $1000.
Independent expenditure committees
must register and file reports once
collections or expenditures exceed
$1000.
“Paid for by” requirements imposed
on candidates and committees
“Paid for by” requirements imposed only
on independent expenditure
committees
31Comparison Chart of City Code and State Campaign Finance Provisions
Fort Collins City Code State Law
FC has a detailed complaint process
that was significantly
amended/expanded in 2020
State law only addresses complaints
against candidates and committees that
file with the Secretary of State and
states that any complaint arising out of
a municipal campaign finance matter
must be exclusively file with the
municipal clerk without any guidance on
how they should be handled
32Comparison Chart of City Code and State Campaign Finance Provisions
Fort Collins City Code State Law
Political committees are defined to
mean:
(1)Two (2) or more persons who are
elected, appointed or chosen, or
have associated themselves, for the
purpose of accepting contributions
or making expenditures to support or
oppose one (1) or more candidates.
(2)Any person that has accepted
contributions for the purpose of
supporting or opposing one (1) or
more candidates.
State law does not limit political
committees to persons who associated
for the purpose of accepting
contributions or making expenditure to
support or oppose one or more
candidates.
QUESTIONS?
For Questions or Comments, Please Contact:
THANK YOU!
Anissa Hollingshead, City Clerk
ahollingshead@fcgov.com 970-416-2995