HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 01/19/2021 - RESOLUTION 2021-010 ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITAgenda Item 15
Item # 15 Page 1
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY January 19, 2021
City Council
STAFF
Blaine Dunn, Accounting Director
John Duval, Legal
SUBJECT
Resolution 2021-010 Adopting Amendments to the City's Financial Management
Policies. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this item is to update four of the internal Financial Management Policies:
Policy 1 - Budget
Policy 2 - Revenue
Policy 3 - General
Policy 5 - Fund Balance Minimums
The policies are reviewed on a three-year rolling schedule. The recommended changes have been presented
to the Council Finance Committee which supported the changes recommended.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution.
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
Financial policies of certain significance are approved by Council. Others are approved by the City Manager
and Chief Financial Officer. Staff and the Council Finance Committee have agreed to review and update
Council-approved policies every three years. This year four policies were reviewed by staff and the Council
Finance Committee: Budget, Revenue, General, and Fund Balance Minimums.
Recommended changes for each policy are summarized as follows:
Financial Management Policy 1 - Budget: Throughout the policy, staff recommends updating the word
“citizen” with the word “resident”. There are additional language clean ups throughout the policy. The only
sections with major changes are:
•Section 1.1 Overview:
-Call out for the exception of a one-year budget in fiscal years 2021 and 2022.
•Section 1.5(A) Budgeting Control Systems, Budget Transfers:
-Clarify what the City Manager and Chief Financial officer have authority to do with budget transfers.
Financial Management Policy 2 - Revenue: This policy has three sections with recommended changes:
•Section 2.3(C) Fee Policy, Establishment and Modification of Fees and Charges:
Agenda Item 15
Item # 15 Page 2
- Updates to this policy reflect the current process used for establishing fees. This includes making
changes to reflect the cadence fee updates, and how often a fee study analysis is performed.
• Section 2.4 Sales and Use Tax Distribution
- Update tax tables to reflect new taxes effective January 1, 2021.
• Section 2.5 Philanthropic Contributions
- Currently named 2.5 Private Contributions, staff recommends changing the name of this section to
better align across all policies. Staff also recommends expanding this section to discuss accountability
and transparency associated with philanthropic gifts. The changes to this policy align with Financial
Policy 52 - City Give Financial Governance Policy.
Financial Management Policy 3 - General: This policy covers numerous topics that do not warrant their own
standalone policy. This policy has three sections with recommended changes:
• Section 3.2 Medical Insurance and Retirement Plans:
- Updates include cleaning up language and updating contribution and vesting terms for the 401(a) and
457 plans.
• Section 3.3 Fund Organization:
- Adding language indicating City Code also establishes rules for funds.
- Updating list of funds.
• Section 3.4 Cost Recovery and Fee Setting:
- Recommend updating the section regarding charitable giving to be consistent with the City Give
policies.
Financial Management Policy 5 - Fund Balance Minimums: This policy has three very minor changes:
• Section 5.1 Governmental Funds and Fund Balance:
- Correct wording under fund types for the type of funds able to carry an unassigned balance.
• Section 5.2 Proprietary Fund and Working Capital:
- Correct a section reference.
• Section 5.3 Minimum Balances:
- Clarify the 60-day Liquidity Goal is not a restricted balance but an emergency reserve.
CITY FINANCIAL IMPACTS
While these policies help the City and staff to administer the City finances, there are no direct financial impacts
to the City.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Policy 1 - Budget DRAFT (redline) (PDF)
2. Policy 2 - Revenue DRAFT (redline) (PDF)
3. Policy 3 - General DRAFT (redline) (PDF)
4. Policy 5 - Fund Balance Minimums DRAFT (redline) (PDF)
Financial Management Policy 1
Budget Policy Issue Date:
11/21/1710/19/20
Version: 43
Issued by: Budget
Director
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
1
1.1 Overview
The Fort Collins City Charter establishes time limits and the essential content of the City
Manager’s proposed budget, however the budget preparation process is not prescribed, but
is developed by the City Manager with input from the City Council.
The fiscal year of the City is the calendar year. The City may adopt budgets for a budget
term of one fiscal year or more. After the Charter amendment in 1997 allowing the City
Council to set by ordinance a budget term to be more than one fiscal year, the Council has
adopted two-year budgets that correspond with the election cycle, with the recent
exception of having a one-year budget for fiscal years 2021 and 2022 due to the COVID
pandemic.
The budget is a 2-year plan by which the City Council sets the financial and operational
priorities for the City - through the budget, services are implemented. The budget along with
the annual appropriation ordinance provides the basis for the control of expenditures. The
State Constitution and the City Charter provide the basic legal requirements and time lines
for the process. Council goals, ordinances and resolutions provide additional direction and
respond to the needs of the community.
Objective:
Governments allocate scarce resources to programs and services through the budget process. As a
result, it is one of the most important activities undertaken by governments. The purpose of this
policy is to establish parameters and provide guidance governing the budget for the City of Fort
Collins (City).
Applicability:
This budget policy applies to all funds and Service Areas of the City.
Authorized by:
City Council Resolution 2014-058, 2017-101, 2021-XXX
ATTACHMENT 1
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
2
1.2 Principles for Budget Planning
The City provides a wide variety of services to the residents of the community. It is in the
power of the City Council to adopt a budget and manage the available resources to best meet
the service needs for the overall good of the community (City Charter Article II, Section 5 (c)).
In 2005 the City Council, on recommendation from the City mManager, endorsed the
Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO) budget process. At a high level, the budgeting for outcomes
methodology can be summarized as:
1. Determine how much money is available. The budget should be built on expected
revenues. This would include base revenues, any new revenue sources, and the
potential use of fund balance.
2. Prioritize results. The results or outcomes that matter most to citizens residents
should be defined. Elected leaders should determine what programs are most
important to their constituents.
3. Allocate resources among high priority results. The allocations should be made in a
fair and objective manner.
4. Conduct analysis to determine what strategies, programs, and activities will best
achieve desired results.
5. Budget available dollars to the most significant programs and activities. The
objective is to maximize the benefit of the available resources.
6. Set measures of monthly progress, monitor, and close the feedback loop. These
measures should assign monthly budget, spell out the expected results and outcomes
and how they will be measured.
7. Check what actually happened. This involves using performance measures to
compare actual versus budgeted results, and financial measures for budget versus
actual results on a monthly basis.
8. Communicate performance results. Internal and external stakeholders should be
informed of the results in an understandable format.
At that time, the City Council also identified the key outcomes it believed should be used in
the new budget process. In addition, the 2005-2007 Policy Agenda sets forth the
implementation and continued improvement of the collaborative budget process, aligning
spending with desired outcomes.
In 2012, the City Council passed resolution 2012-076 promoting improved results through
performance measures and data-driven decision making. In reference to the budget, an
outcome-based performance measurement system will help ensure that available resources
are used to achieve excellent results at low cost to the taxpayers and will enhance the citizen’s
resident’s understanding of the City and the services it provides.
1.3 Scope
A. Comprehensiveness
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
3
The proposed budget shall provide a complete financial plan for each fund of the cCity and
shall include appropriate financial statements for each type of fund showing comparative
figures for the last completed fiscal year, comparative figures for the current year, and the
City Manager's recommendations for the ensuing budget term (City Charter Article V, Part 1,
Section 2). In addition, the City of Fort Collins Budget Document may include items such as:
1) Statement of organization-wide strategic goals.
2) A description of the budget process, including a timeline.
3) A Glossary of Budget Terms.
4) A City of Fort Collins organizational chart.
5) Letter from the City Manager.
6) Budget Overview which may include:
a) The economic outlook;
b) Revenue assumptions;
c) Summary of use of reserves;
d) Budget priorities and highlights.
7) Copy of signed appropriation ordinance and a schedule of 2nd year proposed
appropriations.
8) Revenue, expense and changes in fund balance summaries.
9) Summary of employee full-time equivalent staffing by service area and department.
10) A section for each of the key strategic Outcomes, which may include:
a) Information indicating how the Offers in the Outcome are funded, by fund;
b) Major key purchases;
c) Major enhancements purchased;
d) Detailed listing of all offers funded and unfunded;
e) Strategic objectives of the Outcome.
11) Fund Statements.
12) Overview of debt position.
13) Current Capital Improvement Plan.
14) Summary of changes to user fees.
15) Summary of property tax mill levy and assessments.
The annual appropriation ordinance shall also include the levy in mills, as fixed by the
Council, upon each dollar of the assessed valuation of all taxable property within the city, such
levy representing the amount of taxes for cCity purposes necessary to provide, during the
ensuing fiscal year, for all properly authorized expenditures to be incurred by the cCity,
including interest and principal of general obligation bonds. If the Council fails in any year to
make said tax levy as above provided, then the rate last fixed shall be the levy fixed for the
ensuing fiscal year and the Financial Officer shall so certify (City Charter Article V, Part 1,
sSection 5).
B. Budget Form
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
4
The City of Fort Collins uses the Budgeting For Outcomes model to create the City budget. A
new budget is designed from the ground up based on the results desired in each of the
Outcomes defined by the City. The BFO budget-building process includes four steps:
1) Determine how much revenue will be available (the price people pay);
2) Determine the priorities of the City and its citizens residents and the results to be
achieved;
3) Allocate the revenue needed to achieve the desired results;
4) Determine which budget items will best produce the desired results at the price allocated.
C. Basis of Budgeting
All budgetary procedures conform to the City Charter and Code, state regulations and to
generally accepted accounting principles. The basis or principle used for budgeting is the
same as that used for accounting, with a few exceptions, and varies according to the fund type.
Governmental Funds use the modified-accrual basis of accounting. This means that revenues
are recognized when they are earned, measurable and available. Expenditures are recognized
in the period that liabilities are due and payable. The budgetary basis is the same and is used
in the General Fund, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds, and Capital Project Funds.
Proprietary and Fiduciary Funds use the full accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are
recognized when they are earned and expenses are recognized when liabilities are incurred.
However, the budgetary basis in these funds is primarily based on the modified-accrual
approach. Instead of authorizing budget for depreciation of capital assets, the budget
measures and appropriates cash outflows for capital acquisition and construction, which is a
modified-accrual approach. In full accrual based accounting debt proceeds are recorded as
liabilities rather than a revenue (funding source). For these reasons, a reconciliation and
adjustment is made on these fund statements to show the difference between the budgetary
basis and the accounting basis.
D. Budget Calendar
The fiscal and accounting year shall be the same as the calendar year. "Budget term" shall
mean the fiscal year(s) for which any budget is adopted and in which it is to be administered.
Council shall set by ordinance the term for which it shall adopt budgets in accordance with
this Article (City Charter Article V, Part 1, sSection 1).
On or before the first Monday in September, commencing in 2010 and every other year
thereafter, the City Manager shall file with the City Clerk a proposed budget for the City for
the ensuing two-year term (City Charter Article V, Part 1, sSection 2). The Council shall, within
ten (10) days after the filing of said proposed budget with the City Clerk, set a time certain
for public hearing and cause notice of such public hearing to be given by publication. At the
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
5
hearing, all persons may appear and comment on any or all items and estimates in the
proposed budget. Upon completion of the public hearing the Council may revise the budget
estimates (City Charter Article V, Part 1, sSection 3).
After said public hearing and before the last day of November preceding the budget term, the
Council shall adopt the budget for the ensuing term. The adoption of the budget shall be by
ordinance. Before the last day of November of each fiscal year, the Council shall appropriate
such sums of money as it deems necessary to defray all expenditures of the cCity during the
ensuing fiscal year. The appropriation of funds shall be accomplished by passage of the
annual appropriation ordinance. Such appropriation of funds shall be based upon the budget
as approved by the Council but need not be itemized further than by fund with the exception
of capital projects and federal or state grants which shall be summarized by individual project
or grant (City Charter Article V, Part 1, sSection 4).
Appropriations for each year of the two-year budget will be approved by the City Council
annually. Appropriations for the 2nd year of the biannual budget are adopted during the
budget revision process. That process allows for adjustments to the originally adopted
biennial budget that address new Council priorities or support changing needs based on
economic conditions. The City Manager may present any budget adjustment
recommendations to the City Council in Work Sessions and then Council may amend the
budget and, as required by the State and City Charter, appropriate or authorize expenditures
for the coming fiscal year.
1.4 Roles and Responsibilities
All powers of the cCity and the determination of all matters of policy shall beare vested in the
Council except as otherwise provided by the Charter. Without limitation of the foregoing, the
Council shall havehas the power to adopt the City’s budget of the city.
The City Manager shall beis responsible to the Council for the proper administration of all
affairs of the City and to that end shall have has the power and beis required to prepare the
budget and submit it to the Council and be responsible for its administration after adoption.
The City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, along with the other executive directors, known
as the Budget Lead Team (BLT), develop the guidelines, consistent with the policies, to be
used for budget preparation. During the development of the budget, various department and
division representatives may be called upon to provide their expertise.
From April through June, City staff from all departments and divisions prepares the Offers
(budget requests) for inclusion in the budget.
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
6
1.5 Budgeting Control System
No appropriation shall may be made by the Council which exceeds the revenues, reserves or
other funds anticipated or available at the time of the appropriation, except for emergency
expenses incurred by reason of a casualty, accident or unforeseen contingency arising after
the passage of the annual appropriation ordinance (City Charter Article V, Part I, Section 8
(a)).
Control of expenditures is exercised at the fund level. Fund managers are responsible for all
expenditures made against appropriations within their fund and can allocate available
resources within the fund.
All appropriations unexpended or unencumbered at the end of the fiscal year shall lapse to
the applicable general or special fund, except for:
• appropriations for capital projects which shalldo not lapse until the completion of the
capital project; and
• federal or state grants which shalldo not lapse until the expiration of the federal or state
grant (City Charter Article V, Part I, Section 11).
A. Budget Transfers
Between Funds or Capital Projects
During the fiscal year, the Council may, by ordinance, upon the recommendation of the City
Manager, transfer any unexpended and unencumbered appropriated amount or portion
thereof from one fund or capital project account to another fund or capital project account
provided that:
1) the purpose for which the transferred funds are to be expended remains unchanged;
2) the purpose for which the funds were initially appropriated no longer exists; or
3) the proposed transfer is from a fund or capital project account in which the amount
appropriated exceeds the amount needed to accomplish the purpose specified in the
appropriation ordinance (City Charter Article V, Part I, Section 10 (b)).
Within a Fund
Budget control is maintained at the departmental level. The City Manager may, during the
fiscal year, transfer any unexpended and unencumbered appropriated amount within the
same fund (Charter Article V, Section 10(a)). The Chief Financial Officer also has the authority
to approve departmental expenses greater than the budget for that department so long as the
overall expenses in the fund serving that department are less than the budgeted amount for
the fund within a fund. In no case may the total expenditures of a particular fund exceed that
which is appropriated by the City Council (City Charter Article V, Part I, Section 10 8(ab)).
B. Applicable Amendments to the Budget
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
7
Budget Increases
There generally are four opportunities during the fiscal year for supplemental additions to
the current year annual appropriation approved by Council:
1) The first is through the encumbrance carry-forward process whereby approved purchase
orders that cannot be executed prior to the end of the fiscal year will have available
budget carried forward into the new year.
2) The second is usually adopted in March/April to re-appropriate funds from the previous
year’s ending balance for projects or obligations that were approved but not completed
during that year.
3) The third opportunity in the 2nd half of the year is used to fine-tune (clean-up) the
current fiscal year for previously unforeseen events. In addition, if revenue is received
during the fiscal year from a source that was not anticipated at the time of budget
adoption or appropriation for the fiscal year, such as grants or implementation of a new
fee, Council may appropriate that unanticipated revenue for expenditure when received
anytime during the year.
4) Lastly, the Council, upon recommendation of the City Manager, may make supplemental
appropriations by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year; provided, however, that
the total amount of such supplemental appropriations, in combination with all previous
appropriations for that fiscal year, shall not exceed the then current estimate of actual
and anticipated revenues to be received by the city during the fiscal year. This provision
shall not prevent the Council from appropriating by ordinance at any time during the
fiscal year such funds for expenditure as may be available from reserves accumulated in
prior years, notwithstanding that such reserves were not previously appropriated (City
Charter Article V, Part I, Section 9).
Budget Decreases/Frozen Appropriations
The budget may be decreased below adopted appropriations during the fiscal year due to
changes in service demand, changes in economic conditions, and/or changes in Council goals.
Each service area is responsible for developing a plan to reduce appropriations, which wi ll
be ready for implementation should the need arise. If the City Manager directs budget
reductions, Council will be informed and the appropriations will be “set aside” through
administrative action. While the appropriation amount is not changed, expenditures shall
not exceed the reduced amount recommended by the City Manager.
C. Order of Funding when Multiple Funding Sources Available
Sometimes a given project or program has multiple sources of funding available. Examples
of such projects include but are not limited to grant funded projects, jointly funded
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
8
projects/programs between governmental and proprietary funds, or projects/programs
where both dedicated tax and/or fee revenues and General Fund tax revenues are available.
Unless stated otherwise within the authorizing ordinance, budget offer, or a contractual
agreement, funding sources will be applied in the order of most-constrained to least-
constrained in the judgment of City staff. For example, a project jointly funded by the
General Fund and the Natural Areas Fund would first fund project spending using all
available and appropriated Natural Areas revenues prior to spending appropriated General
Fund revenues. This is in an effort to maximize the benefit of available sources in
accordance with the principles described in section 1.2 above.
1.6 Balanced Budget Definition
All funds are required to balance. As such, total anticipated revenues must equal the sum of
budgeted expenditures for each fund. Revenues are derived from two sources: current
revenue charges and unallocated reserves carried forward from prior years.
1.7 Contingency Planning for Unanticipated Revenue Shortfalls
During times when the City experiences significant unanticipated revenue shortfalls, a
contingency plan will be developed that outlines the necessary steps to align expenditures to
meet the actual revenue received. The contingency plan will target the funds being impacted
by the revenue shortfall. In general, the priority order of the steps in our contingency
methodology are:
• Align ongoing expenditures with anticipated ongoing revenue
• Sweep vacancy savings and non-service related savings such as fuel or utilities if under
budget
• If a Contingency Reserve has been established, utilize a portion of that reserve
• Develop a stop doing list utilizing the drilling platform prioritization.
• At a Service Area level, reduce expenditures related to
o discretionary expenditures
o new hires/vacancies (postponement of posting positions)
o travel and training
o reduced levels of support to programs
Financial Management Policy 2
Revenue Issue Date: 12/20/2016
Version: 4 DRAFT3
Issued by: Revenue and Project
Manager
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
1
2.1 Limitations under TABOR (Taxpayer Bill of Rights)
A. Background
The City of Fort Collins’ revenue and expenditures are limited by Colorado’s Taxpayer’s Bill
of Rights in Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution (TABOR). While TABOR limits
both revenue and expenditures, its primary application is in limiting revenue collections.
Growth in revenue is limited to the increase in the Denver-Boulder-Greeley Consumer Price
Index plus local growth (new construction and annexation). This percentage is added to the
preceding year’s revenue base, giving the dollar limit allowed for revenue collection in the
ensuing year. Any revenue collected over the limit must be refunded to the citizenresidents
unless the voters approve the retention of the excess revenue. Federal grants or gifts to the
City are not included in the revenue limit. City enterprises (electric, water, wastewater and
stormwater utilities) are also exempt from the imposed limits. In 2003, the Golf Fund
revenue sources was considered for enterprise status for purposes of TABOR. In order for
an entity to become an enterprise, voters must approve a Charter amendment for that
entity.
Objective:
Monitoring and controlling revenues is important to the City of Fort Collins. Through its revenue policy, the
City primarily aims to maintain a diversified revenue system which will protect it from possible short-term
fluctuations in any of its various revenue sources. To accomplish this, revenues are monitored on a
continuous basis. An understanding of the economic and legal factors which directly and indirectly affect
the level of revenue collections is an important part of the City’s revenue policy.
Applicability:
This policy applies to all City Revenues. This policy does/does not apply to or govern revenues generated by
City-owned general improvement districts, DDA, URA, PFA or Library District.
Authorized by:
City Council, Resolutions 1994-174, 2013-093, and 2016-096, 2021-XXX
ATTACHMENT 2
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
2
B. ‘De-Brucing’
In November 1997, Fort Collins’ voters approved a ballot measure that allows the City to
retain revenues that exceed the growth limit imposed by TABOR. The measure specified
that any retained revenues over the growth limit must be used for certain designated
purposes.
• Public Health and Safety (including, but not limited to, environmental monitoring
and mitigation)
• Transportation
• Growth Management
• Maintenance and Repair of Public Facilities
C. TABOR Notice for New Tax or Tax Increase
• Develop revenue forecasts that are reasonable and factor in the implications of over
collection.
• Review these forecasts with the appropriate leadership staff.
D. Monitor New Tax Revenue
• Staff will monitor actual revenue against the forecast revenue disclosed in the TABOR
notice.
• In the second year, confirm first years’ actual revenue to forecast and determine if any
action is needed. Provide a report to the City Council with results and any
recommended action.
E. TABOR Legislation and Judicial Decisions
Staff shall monitor new TABOR legislation, judicial decisions and actions taken by other
governments to see if they affect the City. This will include working with the City’s outside
consultants, such as special bond counsel and CML. When such matters are discovered
affecting the City, staff will confer to determine what actions, if any, the City should take in
response.
F. Documentation of ‘Fiscal Year Spending’ under TABOR
Although the City has de-Bruced, current interpretations of TABOR section 20(3)(c) merits
the need for the ongoing calculation of “‘fiscal year spending’”. Staff will maintain and
update records annually to calculate the City’s fiscal year spending under TABOR . These
records shall be kept for at least six years. Also, documentation shall be kept current that
defines which related agencies, funds and types of revenues are required under TABOR to
be included in fiscal year spending and those that can be excluded.
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
3
2.2 Revenue Review, Objectives and Monitoring
A. Review and Projections
The City reviews estimated revenue and fee schedules as part of the budget process.
The major revenue sources in the General Fund are sales and use tax, property tax,
lodging tax, intergovernmental revenues, fines and forfeitures, user fees and charges,
and transfers from other funds. Conservative revenue projections are made for the
budget term. The projections are monitored and updated as necessary.
B. Principles
The City has established six (6) general principles that will be used to guide decisions on
revenue:
1. Develop and maintain stable revenue sources.
The City will strive to maintain stable revenue sources by:
a. Targeting revenue sources with minimal volatility
b. Monitoring current revenue sources for variability
c. Adjusting forecasts as necessary to accommodate unanticipated
increases and declines
d. Monitoring and adjusting expenditures for unanticipated revenue
gains/losses
2. Develop and maintain a diverse revenue base.
For all general government operations, the City will strive to maintain
diverse revenue sources. The City recognizes that becoming too dependent
upon one revenue source would make revenue yields more vulnerable to
economic cycles. Therefore, the City will strive to maintain diverse revenue
sources by:
a. Targeting revenue from multiple sources
b. Working to expand fee based revenue where possible
c. Working to minimize overdependence on any single revenue source
d. Staff will monitor dependency on sales and use tax to ensure an over
reliance does not occur
3. Cultivate revenue sources that are equitable among citizenresidents of different
economic levels.
The City will strive to preserve a revenue stream that does not overburden
low income residents by:
a. Providing low income citizenresidents with opportunities to participate
in programs through reduced fee structures and scholarships
b. Providing a Sales Tax on Food and Utility rebate to lessen the burden of
taxes and fees on low income citizenresidents
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
4
c. Ensuring fees do not exceed cost to provide service
4. Generate adequate revenue to maintain service levels in line with
citizenresident expectations.
The City will generate adequate revenue to maintain core service levels by:
a. Ensuring fees for service do not exceed cost to provide service
b. Maintaining a cost recovery model
c. Monitoring service level performance annually through the Community
Scorecard
d. Regularly reviewing services to assess core vs. desired
5. Maintain healthy reserves.
The City will maintain healthy reserves by:
a. Adhering to State mandated reserve and internal reserve policies
b. Maintaining a Tabor (State) reserve for the General Fund of 3% or more
of the City’s fiscal year spending
c. Meeting City policy for the General Fund of an additional contingency of
60 days or 17% of next year’s adopted budgeted expenditures
6. Fees for Services are fairly born by those who use those services.
C. Monitoring
In an annual summary financial report the major sources revenue and the associated
percentages will be reviewed by the Council Finance Committee.
2.3 Fee Policy
As a home rule municipality, the City of Fort Collins has the ability to determine the extent
to which fees should be used to fund City facilities, infrastructure and services. There are
two kinds of fees that the City may establish: Impact Fees and Special Service Fees. Impact
fees are typically one-time charges levied by the City against new development. Impact The
fees are based on current levels of service and act as a buy-in method for new development.
The revenue can only be used for capital infrastructure needs created by the impact of the
new development. However, the City may and does employ other methodologies legally
available to calculate its impact fees. Special service fees are charges imposed on persons or
property that are designed to defray the overall cost of the particular municipal service for
which the fee is imposed. This Policy sets forth principles for identifying: (1) the kinds of
services for which the City could appropriately impose fees; (2) methods for calculating the
percentage of costs to be recovered by such fees; and (3) the manner in which the fees
should be allocated among individual fee payers.
A. Fees should be cost related
The amount of a fee should not exceed the overall cost of providing the facility,
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
5
infrastructure or service for which the fee is imposed. Cost may include direct and
indirect costs. That is:
1. Costs which are directly related to the provision of the service; and,
2. Support costs which are more general in nature but provide support for the
provision of the service.
B. Percentage of cost recovery
The extent to which the total cost of service should be recovered through fees
depends upon the following factors:
1. The nature of the facilities, infrastructure or services. In the case of fees for
facilities, infrastructure as well as governmental and proprietary services, total
cost recovery may be warranted. In the case of governmental services, it may be
appropriate for a substantial portion of the cost of such services to be borne by the
City’s taxpayers, rather than the individual users of such services.
2. The nature and extent of the benefit to the fee payers. When a particular facility
or service results in substantial, immediate and direct benefit to fee payers, a
higher percentage of the cost of providing the facility or service should be
recovered by the fee. When a particular facility or service benefits not only the fee
payer but also a substantial segment of the community, lower cost recovery is
warranted.
3. The level of demand for a particular service. Because the pricing of services can
significantly affect demand, full cost recovery for services is more appropriate
when the market for the services is strong and will support a high level of cost
recovery.
4. Ease of collection. In the case of impact fees, ease of collection is generally not a
factor. In the case of fees for services, however, such fees may prove to be
impractical for the City to utilize if they are too costly to administer.
C. Establishment and Modification of Fees and Charges
The following Impact Fees imposed by the City are established by the City Council by
ordinance and may be modified only by ordinance of the City Council.
1. Six Capital Expansion Fees: Transportation, Neighborhood Park, Community Park,
Fire, Police and General Government
2. Five Utility Fees: Water Supply Requirement, Electric Capacity, Sewer Plant
Investment, Stormwater Plant Investment, Water Plant Investment
Fee updates occur on a regular two and four-year cadence and fee updates occur
together to provide a more holistic view of the impact of any fee increases. Detailed
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
6
fee study analysis for all six Capital Expansion Fees occurs every four years. This
requires an outside consultant through a request for proposal (RFP) process where
data is provided by City staff. Findings by the consultant are also verified by City staff.
For Utility Fees, a detailed fee study is planned every two years. These are internal
updates by City staff with periodic consultant verification. Fee study analysis will be
targeted in the odd year before Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO). In years without an
update, an inflation adjustment occurs.
The amounts of all other service and administrative fees may be determined by the
City Manager as provided in City Code Chapter 7.5, Article I, absent any provision of
the City Charter the contrary. Development Review/Building Fees follow the same
four-year cadence as the Capital Expansion Fees.
All fee revenues will be estimated by the City Manager and submitted to the City
Council as part of the City Manager’s recommended budget.
Aside from user fees, (e.g. recreation classes and facility room rentals), all fees
imposed by the City will be established by the City Council by ordinance. In the case of
impact fees, utility fees and charges, and special service fees assessed against property
the ordinance establishing the fees will determine:
1. The level of cost that should be recovered through the fees according to the
criteria established in this Policy;
2. An appropriate method for apportioning the cost of providing each service among
the users of the service; and,
3. A procedure for periodically reviewing and modifying the amount of fees in order
to maintain appropriate cost recovery levels.
The amounts of these kinds of fees may be modified only by ordinance of the City
Council.
The amounts of other Special Service Fees, such as user fees charged for the use of
City facilities, may be determined by the City Manager, according to criteria
established by the City Council by ordinance, absent any provision of th e City Charter
or Code to the contrary.
All fee revenues will be estimated by the City Manager and submitted to the City
Council as part of the City Manager’s recommended budget.
D. Rebate Programs
If the amount of a particular fee is considered to be too high to accommodate the
needs of particular segments of the community and the public interest would be
served by adjusting the amount or manner of payment of such fees in particular
instances, the amount of the fee may be waived, rebated, or deferred as ap propriate.
In the case of fees established by ordinance, the criteria for waiving, rebating, or
deferring payment of such fees shall be established by the City Council by ordinance.
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
7
2.4 Sales and Use Tax Distribution
Sales and Use Tax shall be used and accounted for as intended by the voters. Details of how
the different segments of sales and use tax are used are outlined in the City Code Chapter
25. The following is a summary for informational purposes only.
The City's Sales and Use Tax currently totals 3.85 cents on a $1.00 purchase, developed as
follows:
In effect through December 31, 2020
1968 - General City uses 1.00 cent
1980 - General City uses 1.00 cent
1982 - General City uses 0.25 cent
2015 - Street Maintenance 0.25 cent*
2015 - Community Capital Improvement Program 0.25 cent*
2006 - Natural Areas & Open Space 0.25 cent*
2011 - Keeping Fort Collins Great 0.85 cent**
3.85 cents
* Excludes sales and use tax on grocery food for home consumption
** Excludes sales and use tax on grocery food for home consumption and manufacturing
equipment
Taxes effective beginning January 1, 2021
Begin Through Uses Rate per $1.00
1968 No end General City Purposes 1.00 cent
1980 No end General City Purposes 1.00 cent
1982 No end General City Purposes 0.25 cent
2016 2025 Street Maintenance 0.25 cent *
2016 2025 Community Capital Improvement Program 0.25 cent *
2006 2029 Natural Areas & Open Space 0.25 cent *
2021 No end General City Purposes 0.60 cent **
2021 2030 General City Purposes 0.25 cent **
3.85 cents
* Excludes sales and use tax on grocery food for home consumption
** Excludes sales and use tax on grocery food for home consumption and manufacturing
equipment
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
8
2.5 Private Philanthropic Contributions
The City of Fort Collins (City) will pursue philanthropic support consistent with the City’s goals and
objectives, and in the best interests of Fort Collins residents. The City will always consider the public trust
and comply with all applicable laws when soliciting and accepting philanthropic donations.
Strong oversight of philanthropic gifts is a priority, and the City has created multiple layers of
accountability and transparency for donated funds and the projects receiving donated funds. Charitable
gifts to the City can only be used for the intended purpose designated by donors. Charitable gifts to the
City delivered directly into the budgets of benefiting projects, and can’t be redirected by elected officials
or City staff.
TheCity reserves the right to decline any charitable gift if, upon review, acceptance of the donation offer is d
etermined in the sole discretion of the City not to be in the best interests of the City.
In 2019, the City of Fort Collins adopted Administrative Policy 52-City Give to create standards and
protocols for the acceptance and governance of charitable gifts, and for the orchestration of
philanthropic practices. Additionally, the City adopted Finance Governance Policy to establish protocols
for City Give, staff and officials regarding the acceptance and documentation of philanthropic gifts, and
procedures to responsibly and efficiently manage charitable gifts.
Efforts should be made to secure private contributions in support of City programs and
services, as these contributions are an integral part of their successful operation.
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
9
Getting Help
Please contact the Revenue and Project Manager with any questions at 970.221.6626.
Related Policies/References
City Code Chapter 25 Taxation, Article III Sales & Use Tax
City Code Chapter 26 Utilities
Administrative Fee
Definitions
Governmental Services: services provided by the City for the public good such as regulating land use,
maintaining streets, and providing police and fire protection.
Impact Fees: usually one-time charges, levied by the City against new development to offset the impacts of
the new developments
Proprietary Services: services provided for the benefit and enjoyment of the residents of the City, at their
discretion, such as parks and recreation services
Rebate: a return of a portion of a fee within a specified time. Unlike a waiver or discount, the rebate is given
after the fee has been paid in full
Special Service Fee: charges imposed on persons or property that are designed to defray the overall cost of
the particular municipal service for which the fee is imposed
Waiver: when a portion of a fee is reduced before being paid by a buyer
Financial Management Policy 3
General Financial Policies Issue Date: 11/21/17
Version: 54
Issued by: City Council
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
1
3.1 Administrative Charges
Certain General Fund departments render services to departments in other funds and shall
be equitably apportioned to those other funds. General Fund departments that do not have
a direct billing mechanism shall have their costs allocated using the formula outlined in this
section to other funds, and provide offsetting revenue in the General Fund.
A. General Fund Departmental Costs to be Allocated
Certain General Fund departmental costs to be allocated include City Council, City
Manager, City Clerk, City Attorney, Human Resources, and Finance. Any services in
these departments which are funded by user fees or dedicated revenues are excluded
from the allocation.
The amount of costs to be allocated is the current adopted budget for each of the
departments listed above less user fees and dedicated revenue. With a multi-year
budget, the charge to each fund is increased by a determined percentage for the second
future year and then adjusted to the actual calculation with the next multi-year budget.
B. How Costs Are Allocated
The Human Resources costs are allocated on a prorated basis to funds based on the total
number of budgeted full-time-equivalent positions in each fund.
Objective:
To outline the method and principles for allocation Administrative Charges; establishing the parameters for
the Medical and Retirement Program; Fund Organization; Cost Recovery and Fee Setting; and Capital
Improvement Program.
Applicability:
This policy applies to all City funds. It does not apply to URA, DDA, PFA and Library.
Authorized by:
City Council Resolution 2006-006, 2015-055, and 2017-101, 2021-XXX.
ATTACHMENT 3
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
2
All other General Fund administrative costs are allocated on a prorated basis to the
funds based upon adjusted expenditure budgets for the current year. Adjustments are
made to recognize the lower amount of administrative services required for Capital,
Debt Service, and Purchased Power payments. Capital project budgets are reduced by
two-thirds and averaged over three years. Debt Service budgets are reduced by three-
fourths and the entire Purchased Power budget is deducted from the Light & Power
budget.
C. All Funds Receive Allocations but Not All Funds Are Charged
While Administrative Charges are allocated among all City funds, only specified funds
are charged. Charges are not made to a fund if it is not self-supporting, it is an
Governmental Internal Service fund, or if the funds role is merely to facilitate proper
accounting procedures. For example, the Sales and Use Tax fund and Debt Service fund
receive amounts which are then transferred to other funds. Charging these funds would
lead to double charging many transactions and would not correspond to the level of
service provided by the departments in the General Fund.
D. Review
During each budget process, the Administrative Charge calculation will be reviewed by
the Budget Office. Minor refinements in the allocation formulas are made as needed.
Significant changes will be brought to the City Council for approval to assure that the
equitable apportionment meets requirements of the Code/Charter.
3.2 Medical Insurance and Retirement Plan
A. Medical Insurance
In 1981, the City of Fort Collins set up a partially self-funded medical insurance program.
The objective of a self-funding program is to reduce the cost of medical insurance by
assuming the risk for certain plan expenses. Assuming a portion of the risk lowers the
amount of charges compared to a conventional full insurance plan. For most of the last 33
years Historically, the City has found this funding method to be a cost-effective means of
providing a very desirable employee benefit.
To administer the self-funded and insured portions of the medical insurance plans, the City
conducts a competitive proposal process every five years or more often if required. The
insurance contracts are reviewed annually for both performance and cost. The types of
services contracted for include plan administrative services, stop-loss protection against
larger claims, life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance, and long-term
disability coverage.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
3
B. Retirement Programs
The City of Fort Collins contributes to two types of retirement plans: a Defined Benefit Plan
and Defined Contribution Plans.
1. Defined Benefit Plan - the General Employees Retirement Plan (Plan). The pension
plan is closed to new participants as of 1/1/1999.
The Plan document approved by the City Council outlines the details of the program. A
Board meets monthly to oversee the program. Board members, in consultation with annual
actuary report and other information, make recommendations to City Council for any plan
changes that may be needed from time to time. The Plan currently calls for the employer
(City or PFA) to contribute 10.5%. Because the plan is underfunded, a Supplemental
Contribution is made at a fixed dollar amount each year. The Supplemental amount is
reevaluated every 2 years in conjunction with the budget cycle and based on the latest
actuarial valuation report.
2. 401(a) and 457 Money Purchase Plans. Also known as Defined Contribution Plans,
the contribution rates are as follows:
401 a 457
Employee Group Employer Employee Waiting Employer Employee Waiting
Classified Employees 6.5% 3.0% 6 months 0.0% optional no wait
Classified Employees hired
on or before 3/31/07
7.5% 3.0% 6 months 0.0% optional no wait
Unclassified Management 6.5% 6.0% 6
monthsno
wait
0.0% optional no wait
Unclassified Management
hired on or before 3/31/07
7.5% 6.0% 6
monthsno
wait
0.0% optional no wait
Direct Reports of City Council 10.0% 0.0% no wait match up to
3%
optional no wait
Service Area Directors 10.0% 0.0% no wait match up to
3%
optional no wait
Police & Dispatch (per union
agreement) *
10.58.0% 8.50% no wait match up to
3%
optional 6
months
for
match
Community Service Officer 8.07.5% 3.0% 6 months 0.0% optional no wait
* All employee groups vest immediately, except Police and Dispatch who follow schedule in
union agreement.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
4
Employee contributions to the 457 plan are limited to the amounts published by the IRS.
The City will contract with a third party administrator to provide the Defined Contribution Plans.
City Staff comprised of both Finance and HR will oversee the program and performance of the third
party administrator.
3.3 Fund Organization
Funds for accounting and financial reporting purposes have their own balance sheet and income
statement.
The organization of the City’s Funds is designed to enhance accountability and transparency,
comply with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, meet grant requirements, comply with City
Code/Charter and comply with Colorado statutes. In City Article V, Part III, Section 25 the Financial
Officer is empowered to create funds as appropriate. However, City Code Chapter 8, Article III also
establishes additional parameters for City funds.
The number of funds established should be the minimum needed for legal and operating
requirements. Unnecessary funds can result in inflexibility, undue complexity and inefficient
financial administration.
The City’s funds are organized at two levels of groupings; Fund Groups and Fund Types.
Fund Groups
Governmental Funds Used to account for activities primarily supported by taxes, grants and similar
revenue sources.
Proprietary Funds Used to account for activities that receive significant support from fees and
charges.
Fiduciary Funds Used to account for resources that a City holds as a trustee or agent on behalf of an
outside party that cannot be used to support the City’s own programs.
Within each Fund Group are Fund Types.
Governmental Fund Types
General Fund Main operating fund used to account for and report all financial resources not
accounted for and reported in another fund.
Special Revenue
Funds
Used to account for and report the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are
restricted, committed or assigned to expenditure for specific purposes, other than
debt service or capital projects.
Debt Service Funds Used to account for and report resources that are restricted, committed or
assigned to expenditure for principal and interest.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
5
Capital Project Funds Used to account for and report resources that are restricted, committed or
assigned to expenditure for capital outlays, including the acquisition or
construction of capital facilities or other capital assets.
Proprietary Fund Types
Enterprise Funds Used to account and report any activity for which a fee is charged to external users
of goods and services
Internal Service
Funds
Used to account and report any activity for which a fee is charged to other funds,
departments, or agencies of the City and its component units on a cost
reimbursement basis.
Fiduciary Fund Types
Pension (and Other
Employee Benefit)
Trust Funds
Used to account and report resources that are required to be held in trust for the
members and beneficiaries of defined benefit plans.
Agency Custodial
Funds
Used to report resources held by the City in a purely custodial capacity.
The following is a list of all funds of the City, including legally separate entities but from a financial
reporting perspective are treated as a component unit of the City.
Group and Type Legal Ref. Name
Governmental
General Fund City 100 General Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 250 Capital Expansion Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 251 Sales & Use Tax Fund
Special Revenue Fund Separate 252 General Improvement District #1
Special Revenue Fund City 254 Keep Fort Collins Great Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 255 Community Capital Improvement
Program
Special Revenue Fund City 272 Natural Areas Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 273 Cultural Services & Facilities
Special Revenue Fund City 274 Recreation Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 275 Cemeteries Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 276 Perpetual Care Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 277 Museum Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 280 Community Development Block
Special Revenue Fund City 281 Home Investment Partnership
Special Revenue Fund City 290 Transit Services Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 291 Street Oversizing FundTransportation
Capital Expansion Fee
Special Revenue Fund City 292 Transportation Services Fund
Special Revenue Fund Separate 293 GID #15 - Skyview
Special Revenue Fund City 294 Parking Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 300 Timberline/Prospect SID #94
Debt Service City 304 Capital Leasing Corporation
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
6
Capital Projects Fund City 400 Capital Projects Fund
Capital Projects Fund City 270 Neighborhood Parkland Fund
Capital Projects Fund City 271 Conservation Trust Fund
Proprietary
Enterprise Fund City 500 Golf Fund
Enterprise Fund City 501 Light & Power FundElectric and
Telecommunications Fund
Enterprise Fund City 502 Water Fund
Enterprise Fund City 503 Wastewater Fund
Enterprise Fund City 504 Storm Drainage Fund
Enterprise Fund City 505 Broadband Fund
Internal Service Fund City 601 Equipment Fund
Internal Service Fund City 602 Self-Insurance Fund
Internal Service Fund City 603 Data Aand Communications Fund
Internal Service Fund City 604 Benefits Fund
Internal Service Fund City 605 Utility Customer Service & Admin
Fiduciary
Pension Trust Fund City 700 Employees' Retirement Fund
Governmental
Special Revenue Fund Separate 800 URA - N. College District
Special Revenue Fund Separate 801 URA - Prospect South TIF District
Special Revenue Fund Separate 803 URA - Mall Fund
Special Revenue Fund Separate 820 DDA Operating Fund
Special Revenue Fund Separate 821 DDA Fixed Asset and Long Term Debt
Special Revenue Fund Separate 822 DDA Debt Service Fund
3.4 Cost Recovery and Fee Setting
A. Enterprise Funds shall rely on charges and user fees to recover their costs, rather than
taxes. Utility rates will be based upon the cost of service approach to reflect full distribution
of costs to appropriate rate classes in order to effect equitable sharing of costs. Rates shall
be established and maintained at a level sufficient to maintain positive net income in each of
the utility funds after paying the full cost of operating and maintaining the utilities and
keeping them in good repair and working order. Such rates shall also be sufficient to enable
each utility, where applicable, to meet rate requirements of City or utility enterprise bond
ordinances.
B. The Internal Service Funds shall operate under the following guidelines.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
7
1. Internal service fund charges are limited to the recovery of the cost of the service, including
depreciation, rather than making a profit. Each fund's prior year financial statements and
estimates of future costs form the basis for the calculation of charges.
2. Charges should be set at a level to avoid significant adverse financial impacts on their
customers. Fund customers and independent experts should be allowed to review and make
recommendations about the level of charges. The Finance Department should approve the
analysis and conclusions used to set rates.
3. Internal service funds should compete with similar services offered by the private sector.
The City staff will compare rates every five years. If not competitive with the private sector, the
Finance Department will analyze whether the private sector should provide the service.
4. Internal service funds may build up reserves. Customer-approved master plans and
independent third-party actuarial reviews (for the Benefit and Self-Insurance funds) guide the
level of reserves. Fund managers may spend reserves only for their approved purpose.
5. The City may buy equipment and facilities for the internal service funds through lease-
purchase financing. Management's decision to recommend lease-purchase financing depends
on: (1) cash flow needs; (2) budget constraints; (3) benefit to cost analysis; and (4) level of
reserves.
6. Except for the Utilities Customer Service and Administration Fund, Internal service funds
operate under the same guidelines and constraints as the General Fund and other governmental
funds of the City. The Utilities Customer Service and Administration Fund shall operate under
the guidelines of the Utilities Services Funds.
C. Cultural Services & Facilities Fund Fee Policy
1. Total revenue from fees and charges shall cover a minimum of 55% of Lincoln
Center Operation and Maintenance and Performing and Visual Arts Programming Budgets.
This includes revenues generated at the Lincoln Center from rentals, equipment,
concessions and other miscellaneous sources and all total direct revenues from the
Performing and Visual Arts Programming. A transfer from the General Fund will make up
the difference between total revenue and expenditures.
2. The Cultural Services and Facilities Administration and Museum budgets provide
minimal financial support. These programs are funded primarily by a transfer from the
General Fund.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
8
3. Major capital improvements and renovations will be financed through sources other
than Cultural Services and Facilities Fund.
4.
Charitable gifts and donations—raised from the philanthropic sector of foundations,
corporations, and individuals to support public initiatives of the City of Fort Collins—will be
made directly to the City of Fort Collins. Acceptance, stewardship, tracking, and expenditures of
all charitable gifts are governed by Philanthropic Administrative and City Give Finance
Governance Policy with great attention to transparency and accountability.
Solicitation of funds through donations, fund-raising events, and non-traditional sources
shall be encouraged by the City staff, Lincoln Center League, the Cultural Resources Board
and the City Council. Funding collected for any special purpose shall be earmarked for that
purpose and those funds will be processed through the Fort Collins Foundation.
D. Recreation Fund Rates and Charges Policy
Recreation Rates and Charges shall cover between 68% to 75% of all operating costs, with the
difference to be covered by the City’s General Fund and/or 50% of the Keep Fort Collins Great
portion dedicated to Parks & Recreation. Equipment and rolling stock shall be considered
operating costs in the application of this policy. Recreation Rates and Charges shall not be expected
to cover major capital items such as facility and land acquisitions, major renovations to facilities or
other costs such as utilities, custodial or grounds maintenance.
3.5 Capital Improvement Program
1. Each Service Area or Department shall develop multi-year Master Plans for capital
improvements. On a city-wide basis, staff shall compile a 10 -year Capital Improvement
Plan and update it every two years. Estimates of operating and maintenance costs
should be included;
2. Appropriation requests must include not only the cost of construction or acquisition
and the funding sources, but an estimate of operating and maintenance costs;
3. Capital improvements projects will be administered in accordance with the Capital
Projects Procedures Manual;
4. Appropriations for capital improvements will be constructed and expenditures incurred
only for the purpose as approved by City Council;
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
9
5. Staff should seek out grants and partnerships whenever appropriate.
3.6 Using State Allocation of Private Activity Bonds
A. Background: Conduit debt is issued in a local government’s name, but the resources for
repayment come from individuals or entities that are not part of government. Entities seek
conduit debt because of the government’s ability to issue debt at favorable tax-exempt
rates. Private Activity Bonds (PAB) are a form of conduit debt.
Colorado’s Private Activity Bond allocation program is established by the Colorado Private
Activity Bond Ceiling Allocation Act, Section 24-32-1701, et seq., C.R.S. Pursuant to Section
24-32-1706, annually the City of Fort Collins is offered a portion of the State ceiling as a
local government. If the City does not issue bonds or assign bond capacity to an entity for a
local project by September 15th annually, the cap automatically reverts back to the state’s
pool.
Historically, the City has provided this capacity on a first come first serve basis. It has not
been uncommon for the City to receive no requests. Because more partners are using
programs that can benefit from the lower interest rate that PAB’s offer, the City is
establishing this process.
B. Purpose: PAB’s allow certain private sector activities to receive lower interest rates. PAB’s
may be used for affordable housing development and rehabilitation, specific economic
development programs and for industrial development purposes, among other permitted
uses. The City will attempt to find local uses for this development tool.
C. Communication: Information about the program should be placed on the City’s website
(fcgov.com). Consideration for other advertising and communication methods may be
appropriate.
D. Awarding and Assigning: Awarding PAB and Assigning PAB allocations are different
processes. Assigning PAB to another qualified issuer is strongly preferred. This is to reduce
the administrative investments and leverage the efficiency of qualified issuers who award
PAB’s regularly. If an entity applies for a direct award under the City’s name, staff will
attempt to find a qualified issuer that agrees to accept an assignment from the City and
issue the PAB under their own authority.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
10
E. Application due date: Written applications to use of Fort Collin’s annual PAB allocation are
due to the City’s Chief Sustainability Officer by March 15th.
F. Application Elements:
a. The following items are required when applying for both assignments and direct
awards.
i. A request letter signed by applicant describing the project the PAB would be
used for and including: the applicant’s name, address, phone, email address,
and principal contact.
ii. Amount of allocation being requested.
iii. Bond counsel firm name, address, phone, email address and principal
contact.
iv. Description of Applicant’s local projects and years of operation
v. Number of years’ entity has been doing business in State of Colorado
vi. Provide a Certificate of Good Standing from the Secretary of State’s office.
vii. Description of assets to be purchased or constructed and expenses
incidental to the project, including the sale of bonds.
viii. Explanation of how the project aligns with City objectives.
ix. Number of housing units and target demographics
x. Statement from competent bond counsel that the project is eligible for
qualified private activity bonds.
b. The following additional items are required in applications for direct awards of PAB:
Debt Information
xi. Name, address, phone of principal contact of the proposed underwriter or
lender.
xii. Anticipated timetable for bond transaction.
xiii. Estimated bond redemption and interest payment schedule
xiv. Indicate the type of letter of credit or similar instrument, which will back the
debt
xv. Disclose if the applicant is involved in any litigation which may affect the
validity or repayment of the bonds.
Financial Information
xvi. Audited financial statements for the applicant for the last three years and
interim statements for the current year. If not available, please explain why.
xvii. Projection of future revenues, expenditures and debt service coverage for
the next five years supported by a feasibility study.
Other
xviii. Describe the arrangements that will ensure compliance with arbitrage
reporting and payment requirements.
xix. Name, address and principal contact person for applicant’s local bank.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
11
xx. Briefly describe any potential conflicts of interest of personal/ professional/
political relationships between the applicant’s officers and/or directors or
applicant’s operations and the City of Fort Collins.
xxi. Any other information which provides evidence of the applicant’s ability to
repay the bonds and complete the project.
Debt Security
xxii. All arbitrage calculations and payments must be performed by the trustee
under the terms of the trust agreement or by any such other arrangement
that will iensure compliance. The City must be provided with copies of 8088-
T’s filed with the IRS.
xxiii. The private entity must provide the City with information on the status of
the debt annually and upon any material event.
xxiv. The bond documents must indemnify the City against IRS assessments and
legal fees arising from the financing.
xxv. The issuer’s agent will be responsible for all continuing disclosure
requirements.
c. Items missing from application may result in disqualification from consideration.
G. Fees: There are no fees for applications that request assignments to another qualifying
issuer. However, the following fees apply to applications requesting a direct award of PAB
from the City of Fort Collins.
a. Issuance fee equal to the greater of: A. 0.25% of the par amount of the debt, or B.
$5,000. The fee is capped at $25,000.
b. The cost of a review of the financing by an independent fiscal agent (to be selected
by the City)
c. Any other direct cost incurred by the City related to the financing.
d. There will not be additional issuance fees for any amendment or modification of the
original transaction even if it requires official action by City Council, except for
actual direct costs of the City.
H. Review Process
a. PAB Committee: Applications will be reviewed by a committee of at least 3 people.
Members will include at least one representative each from Social Sustainability,
Economic Health and Finance. Representatives from other departments, such as the
City Manager’s Office will be added as needed. Service Area Directors will make the
necessary appointments to the PAB Committee.
b. At a minimum, the following factors should be considered by the PAB Committee
when making a recommendation:
i. How well the project applied for meets the land use, economic development
and/or affordable housing goals of the City of Fort Collins.
ii. Project feasibility and timing.
iii. Leverage of other investment into the project.
iv. Maintenance of or increase in local tax base.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
12
v. Competing uses for the City’s allocation.
vi. Whether the City’s allocation should be used in multiple projects.
vii. Whether the application should be considered by any City Board or
commission.
c. The PAB Committee will decide on a recommendation no later than July 1.
d. City Council shall approve all PAB assignments or direct awards. The PAB
Committee shall submit their recommendations to the City Council no later than
August 15.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
13
Getting Help
Please contact the Controller with any questions at 970.221.6772416.4354.
Financial Management Policy 5
Fund Balance Minimums Issue Date: 11/21/17
Version: 54
Issued by: City Council
Financial Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums
1
5.1 Governmental Funds and Fund Balances
To set minimum fund balances so as to mitigate risks, maintain good standing with
rating agencies, and ensure cash is available when revenue is unavailable. The policy is
sets minimum fund balances, not targets or maximum balances. Each fund should be
evaluated by staff to determine the appropriateness of maintaining fund balances above
the minimums set in this policy. Contingencies for severe weather, prolonged drought,
and anticipated capital spending should be considered independently from this policy.
The Equity on balance sheet of a governmental fund is called Fund Balance. The current
classifications of Fund Balance in governmental funds are primarily based on the origin
of the constraints. The following categories are in decreasing order of constraints.
Non-Spendable Permanent endowments or assets in a non-liquid form
Restricted Involve a third party: State Legislation or
Contractual Agreements
Committed Set by formal action of the City Council
Assigned By staff, and/or residual balances in a Special Revenue Fund
Unassigned Remaining balances in the General Fundgovernmental funds
Objective:
To set minimum fund balances as to mitigate risk, maintain good standing with rating agencies, and ensure
cash is available when revenue is unavailable. The policy sets minimum fund balances, not targets or
maximum balances. Each fund should be evaluated by staff to determine the appropriateness of
maintaining fund balances above the minimums set in this policy. Contingencies for severe weather,
prolonged drought, and anticipated capital spending should be considered independently from this policy.
Applicability:
Funds—This policy applies to all City funds. It does not apply to URA, DDA, PFA and Library.
Authorized by:
City Council Resolutions 1994-174, 2008-038, 2014-058, and 2017-101, 2021-XXX.
ATTACHMENT 4
Financial Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums
2
Minimums outlined in section 5.3 relate only to Assigned and Unassigned balances.
5.2 Proprietary Fund and Working Capital
Internal Service Funds and Enterprise Funds are accounted for nearly identical to the
private sector. The balance sheets include long term assets and long term liabilities.
The resulting Equity section on their balance sheet, called Net Position, is not always a
good measure of spendable financial resources. To get to spendable financial resources,
a common calculation is to take Current Assets and subtract Current Liabilities, with the
net result called Working Capital.
To further refine, for purposes of this policy, certain required restrictions are further
subtracted and result in Available Working Capital. Some examples of required
restrictions are unspent monies for Art in Public Places, Water Rights, and existing
appropriations for capital projects. The minimums outlined in section 5.53 relate to
Available Working Capital.
5.3 Minimum Balances
The following Minimum Balances refers to Assigned and Unassigned Fund Balances in
governmental funds and Available Working Capital in the Internal Service Funds and
Enterprise Funds.
A. General Fund
60 Day Liquidity Goal - The Commitment for Contingency should be at least 60 days
(17%) of the subsequent year’s originally adopted budgeted expenditures and transfers
out. The calculation for the minimum level shall exclude expenditures and transfers out
for large and unusual one-time items.
Important note – the 60 Day Liquidity Goal is in addition to the Restricted
BalanceEmergency Reserves required by Article X, Section 20(5) of the State
Constitution. This reserve must equal 3% of non-exempt revenue and can only be used
for declared emergencies. Fiscal emergencies are specifically excluded by the State
Constitution as qualifying use of this reserve.
B. Special Revenue Funds
No minimum balance is required.
Financial Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums
3
C. Debt Service Funds
No minimum balance is required.
D. Capital Project Funds
No minimum balance is required.
E. Enterprise Funds
Enterprise funds focus on working capital rather than fund balance.
Enterprise Funds shall maintain a minimum Available Working Capital equal to 25% of
Operating Expenses, less Depreciation. Exception1: In the case of L&P, operating
expenses will include purchased renewable energy for resale but will not include
regular purchased power for resale (i.e. Platte River Power Authority). Exception 2: In
the case of Golf, the minimum fund balance will be 12.5%.
Important note – The Water Fund holds a balance for Restricted Water Rights. The
balance equals the amount of cash in-lieu-of water rights payments and raw water
surcharges less any expenses for acquiring water rights and water storage;
The enterprises funds should also be accumulating available working capital above
these minimums for the purposes of funding future capital projects.
F. Internal Service Funds
Each fund is a unique operation and will maintain a minimum Available Working Capital
as follows:
601 Equipment Fund 8.3% Of annual operating expenses, excluding
depreciation
602 Self-Insurance Fund * 25.0% Of annual operating expenses
603 Data & Communications
Fund
0.0% N/A
604 Benefits Fund 30.0% Of annual medical and dental expenses
605 Utility Customer Service
Fund
0.0% N/A
* Self Insurance Fund will be measured against Available Unrestricted Net Position
instead of Available Working Capital.
Financial Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums
4
5.4 Below Minimum
When circumstances result in balances below the minimum, staff should develop a plan
to restore minimums fund balances and present it to Council Finance Committee.
Financial Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums
5
Definitions
Non Spendable Fund Balances: Applicable to governmental funds. Permanent endowments or assets in a
non-liquid form such as long term inter-agency loans.
Restricted Fund Balances: Applicable to governmental funds. Involve a third party such as State
Legislative requirements, voter ballot language, or the Contractual Agreements with parties
external to the City.
Committed Fund Balances: Applicable to governmental funds. Involve a of formal action by the City
Council. An example is traffic calming revenues are required to be spent on traffic calming
activities. Any unspent monies at end of year are classified as Committed to Ttraffic Ccalming in the
General Fund.
Assigned Fund Balances: Are applicable to governmental funds. Assignments can be made by senior
management. They represent the intent to use the monies for a specific purpose. An example of this
it this the one time Harmony Road monies transferred by the State to the City. Although required to
be used on Harmony Road, staff intends to use the monies only on Harmony Road improvements.
These monies are considered when measuring compliance with minimum fund balances.
Unassigned Fund Balances: Are applicable only to the General governmental Fundfunds. These monies
are considered when measuring compliance with minimum fund balances.
Working Capital: Is a term applicable to Internal Service and Enterprise Funds. It is the difference
between Current Assets and Current Liabilities. Not all Working Capital is available. Available
Working Capital does not include Restrictions for debt, Art in Public Places, approved capital
appropriations, and other restrictions.
Unrestricted Net Position: Is a term applicable to Internal Service and Enterprise Funds. Not all
Unrestricted Net Position is available. Available Unrestricted Net Position does not include unused
Art in Public Places monies, approved capital appropriations, and other commitments.
Liquidity: Assets range from cash to land. The more easily and quickly an asset can be converted to cash
determines its relative liquidity.
Reserves: A legacy term that previously referred to fund balances, or fund balances set aside for a specific
purpose. It is no longer used on financial statements.
Fund Balance: Is a term applicable to Ggovernmental Ffunds. Fund balance or Equity is the difference
between Assets assets ,and Liabilitiesliabilities, deferred outflows of resources and deferred
inflolows of resources. Since governmental funds do not have long term assets and long term debt
on their balance sheet, fund balance is similar and approximates working capital in the private
sector and enterprise funds.
Financial Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums
6
Getting Help
Please contact the Controller with any questions at 970.221.6772.
-1-
RESOLUTION 2021-010
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY’S FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES
WHEREAS, City Council has adopted Financial Management Policies for the City
pursuant to Resolution 94-174, which contemplates that City Council may adopt amendments to
them , which the Council has done several times over the years (collectively, the “Financial
Policies”); and
WHEREAS, the City’s Chief Financial Officer and City Manager are recommending
amendments to four of the current Financial Policies; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to sound and efficient financial planning and
management consistent with the best practices as established by the Government Financial
Officers Association (“GFOA”); and
WHEREAS, “Financial Management Policy 1 - Budget Policy,” with its recommended
amendments, is attached and incorporated by reference as Exhibit “A” (the “Budget Policy”);
and
WHEREAS, the Budget Policy is being recommended for amendment to change the
word “citizen” to “resident, acknowledge the exception of a one-year budget in fiscal years 2021
and 2022, and clarify what the City Manager and Chief Financial Officer are able to do with
budget transfers; and
WHEREAS, “Financial Management Policy 2 – Revenue,” with its recommended
amendments, is attached and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit “B” (the “Revenue
Policy”); and
WHEREAS, the Revenue Policy is being recommended for amendment to update it to
reflect the current process used for establishing fees, update tax tables to reflect new sales and
use taxes effective January 1, 2021, change the name of the currently titled “2.5 Private
Contributions” to better align across all policies, including with “Financial Policy 52 - City Give
Financial Governance Policy,” and expand this section to discuss accountability and
transparency associated with philanthropic gifts; and
WHEREAS, “Financial Management Policy 3 – General Financial Policies,” with its
recommended amendments, is attached and incorporated by reference as Exhibit “C” (the
“General Financial Policies”); and
WHEREAS, the General Financial Policies are being recommended for amendment to
clean up language and update contribution and vesting terms for the 401(a) and 457 plans, add
language regarding establishing rules for funds and update the list of funds, and updates
regarding charitable giving to be consistent with the City Give policies; and
-2-
WHEREAS, “Financial Management Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums,” with its
recommended amendments, is attached and incorporated by reference as Exhibit “D” (the “Fund
Balance Policy”); and
WHEREAS, the Fund Balance Policy is being recommended for amendment to correct
wording under fund types for the type of funds able to carry an unassigned balance, correct a
section reference and clarify that the 60-day Liquidity Goal is not a restricted balance, but an
emergency reserve; and
WHEREAS, the Council Finance Committee has reviewed the Budget Policy, the
Revenue Policy, the General Financial Policies and the Fund Balance Minimum Policy, as they
have been amended, and voted to recommend that City Council approve each of them; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to amend the Financial Polices, as most recently
updated by Council on November 21, 2017, in Resolution 2017-101, by adopting the Budget
Policy, the Revenue Policy, the General Financial Policies and the Fund Balance Policy, to now
read as shown in Exhibits “A,” “B,” “C” and “D,” respectively, in pursuit of the City’s objectives
of sound and efficient financial planning and management consistent with GFOA’s best
practices.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FORT COLLINS, as follows:
Section 1. That the City Council hereby makes and adopts the determinations and
findings contained in the recitals set forth above.
Section 2. That the City Council hereby approves and adopts the Budget Policy, the
Revenue Policy, the General Financial Policies and the Fund Balance Policy, as amended by this
Resolution, to now read as shown in Exhibits “A”, “B,” “C” and “D,” respectively.
Section 3. That except for the amendments of the four Financial Policies as provided
in this Resolution, all other Financial Policies shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect
until the same are amended or repealed by subsequent action of the City Council.
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this
19th day of January, A.D. 2021.
_________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk
Financial Management Policy 1
Budget Policy Issue Date: 10/19/20
Version: 4
Issued by: Budget
Director
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
1
1.1 Overview
The Fort Collins City Charter establishes time limits and the essential content of the City
Manager’s proposed budget, however the budget preparation process is not prescribed, but
is developed by the City Manager with input from the City Council.
The fiscal year of the City is the calendar year. The City may adopt budgets for a budget
term of one fiscal year or more. After the Charter amendment in 1997 allowing the City
Council to set by ordinance a budget term to be more than one fiscal year, the Council has
adopted two-year budgets that correspond with the election cycle, with the recent
exception of having a one-year budget for fiscal years 2021 and 2022 due to the COVID
pandemic.
The budget is a 2-year plan by which the City Council sets the financial and operational
priorities for the City - through the budget, services are implemented. The budget along with
the annual appropriation ordinance provides the basis for the control of expenditures. T he
State Constitution and the City Charter provide the basic legal requirements and timelines for
the process. Council goals, ordinances and resolutions provide additional direction and
respond to the needs of the community.
1.2 Principles for Budget Planning
The City provides a wide variety of services to the residents of the community. It is in the
power of the City Council to adopt a budget and manage the available resources to best meet
the service needs for the overall good of the community (Charter Article II, Section 5 (c)).
Objective:
Governments allocate scarce resources to programs and services through the budget process. As a
result, it is one of the most important activities undertaken by governments. The purpose of this
policy is to establish parameters and provide guidance governing the budget for the City of Fort
Collins (City).
Applicability:
This budget policy applies to all funds and Service Areas of the City.
Authorized by:
City Council Resolution 2014-058, 2017-101, 2021-XXX
EXHIBIT A
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
2
In 2005 the City Council, on recommendation from the City Manager, endorsed the Budgeting
for Outcomes (BFO) budget process. At a high level, the budgeting for outcomes methodology
can be summarized as:
1. Determine how much money is available. The budget should be built on expected
revenues. This would include base revenues, any new revenue sources, and the
potential use of fund balance.
2. Prioritize results. The results or outcomes that matter most to residents should be
defined. Elected leaders should determine what programs are most important to their
constituents.
3. Allocate resources among high priority results. The allocations should be made in a
fair and objective manner.
4. Conduct analysis to determine what strategies, programs, and activities will best
achieve desired results.
5. Budget available dollars to the most significant programs and activities. The
objective is to maximize the benefit of the available resources.
6. Set measures of monthly progress, monitor, and close the feedback loop. These
measures should assign monthly budget, spell out the expected results and outcomes
and how they will be measured.
7. Check what actually happened. This involves using performance measures to
compare actual versus budgeted results, and financial measures for budget versus
actual results on a monthly basis.
8. Communicate performance results. Internal and external stakeholders should be
informed of the results in an understandable format.
At that time, the City Council also identified the key outcomes it believed should be used in
the new budget process. In addition, the 2005-2007 Policy Agenda sets forth the
implementation and continued improvement of the collaborative budget process, alig ning
spending with desired outcomes.
In 2012, the City Council passed resolution 2012-076 promoting improved results through
performance measures and data-driven decision making. In reference to the budget, an
outcome-based performance measurement system will help ensure that available resources
are used to achieve excellent results at low cost to the taxpayers and will enhance the
resident’s understanding of the City and the services it provides.
1.3 Scope
A. Comprehensiveness
The proposed budget shall provide a complete financial plan for each fund of the City and
shall include appropriate financial statements for each type of fund showing comparative
figures for the last completed fiscal year, comparative figures for the current year, and the
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
3
City Manager's recommendations for the ensuing budget term (City Charter Article V, Part 1,
Section 2). In addition, the City of Fort Collins Budget Document may include items such as:
1) Statement of organization-wide strategic goals.
2) A description of the budget process, including a timeline.
3) A Glossary of Budget Terms.
4) A City of Fort Collins organizational chart.
5) Letter from the City Manager.
6) Budget Overview which may include:
a) The economic outlook;
b) Revenue assumptions;
c) Summary of use of reserves;
d) Budget priorities and highlights.
7) Copy of signed appropriation ordinance and a schedule of 2nd year proposed
appropriations.
8) Revenue, expense and changes in fund balance summaries.
9) Summary of employee full-time equivalent staffing by service area and department.
10) A section for each of the key strategic Outcomes, which may include:
a) Information indicating how the Offers in the Outcome are funded, by fund;
b) Major key purchases;
c) Major enhancements purchased;
d) Detailed listing of all offers funded and unfunded;
e) Strategic objectives of the Outcome.
11) Fund Statements.
12) Overview of debt position.
13) Current Capital Improvement Plan.
14) Summary of changes to user fees.
15) Summary of property tax mill levy and assessments.
The annual appropriation ordinance shall also include the levy in mills, as fixed by the
Council, upon each dollar of the assessed valuation of all taxable property within the city, such
levy representing the amount of taxes for City purposes necessary to provide, during the
ensuing fiscal year, for all properly authorized expenditures to be incurred by the City,
including interest and principal of general obligation bonds. If the Council fails in any year to
make said tax levy as above provided, then the rate last fixed shall be the levy fixed for the
ensuing fiscal year and the Financial Officer shall so certify (Charter Article V, Section 5).
B. Budget Form
The City of Fort Collins uses the Budgeting For Outcomes model to create the City budget. A
new budget is designed from the ground up based on the results desired in each of the
Outcomes defined by the City. The BFO budget-building process includes four steps:
1) Determine how much revenue will be available (the price people pay);
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
4
2) Determine the priorities of the City and its residents and the results to be achieved;
3) Allocate the revenue needed to achieve the desired results;
4) Determine which budget items will best produce the desired results at the price allocated.
C. Basis of Budgeting
All budgetary procedures conform to the City Charter and Code, state regulations and to
generally accepted accounting principles. The basis or principle used for budgeting is the
same as that used for accounting, with a few exceptions, and varies according to the fund type.
Governmental Funds use the modified-accrual basis of accounting. This means that revenues
are recognized when they are earned, measurable and available. Expenditures are recognized
in the period that liabilities are due and payable. The budgetary basis is the same and is used
in the General Fund, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds, and Capital Project Funds.
Proprietary and Fiduciary Funds use the full accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are
recognized when they are earned and expenses are recognized when liabilities are incurred.
However, the budgetary basis in these funds is primarily based on the modified-accrual
approach. Instead of authorizing budget for depreciation of capital assets, the budget
measures and appropriates cash outflows for capital acquisition and construction, which is a
modified-accrual approach. In full accrual based accounting debt proceeds are recorded as
liabilities rather than a revenue (funding source). For these reasons, a reconciliation and
adjustment is made on these fund statements to show the difference between the budgetary
basis and the accounting basis.
D. Budget Calendar
The fiscal and accounting year shall be the same as the calendar year. "Budget term" shall
mean the fiscal year(s) for which any budget is adopted and in which it is to be administered.
Council shall set by ordinance the term for which it shall adopt budgets (Charter Article V,
Section 1).
On or before the first Monday in September, commencing in 2010 and every other year
thereafter, the City Manager shall file with the City Clerk a proposed budget for the City for
the ensuing two-year term (Charter Article V, Section 2). The Council shall, within ten (10)
days after the filing of said proposed budget with the City Clerk, set a time certain for public
hearing and cause notice of such public hearing to be given by publication. At the hearing, all
persons may appear and comment on any or all items and estimates in the proposed budget.
Upon completion of the public hearing the Council may revise the budget estimates (Charter
Article V, Section 3).
After said public hearing and before the last day of November preceding the budget term, the
Council shall adopt the budget for the ensuing term. The adoption of the budget shall be by
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
5
ordinance. Before the last day of November of each fiscal year, the Council shall appropriate
such sums of money as it deems necessary to defray all expenditures of the City during the
ensuing fiscal year. The appropriation of funds shall be accomplished by passage of the
annual appropriation ordinance. Such appropriation of funds shall be based upon the budget
as approved by the Council but need not be itemized further than by fund with the exception
of capital projects and federal or state grants which shall be summarized by individual project
or grant (Charter Article V, Section 4).
Appropriations for each year of the two-year budget will be approved by the City Council
annually. Appropriations for the 2nd year of the biannual budget are adopted during the
budget revision process. That process allows for adjustments to the originally adopted
biennial budget that address new Council priorities or support changing needs based on
economic conditions. The City Manager may present any budget adjustment
recommendations to the City Council in Work Sessions and then Council may amend the
budget and, as required by the City Charter, appropriate or authorize expenditures for the
coming fiscal year.
1.4 Roles and Responsibilities
All powers of the City and the determination of all matters of policy are vested in the Council
except as otherwise provided by the Charter. Without limitation of the foregoing, the Council
has the power to adopt the City’s budget.
The City Manager is responsible to the Council for the proper administration of all affairs of
the City and to that end has the power and is required to prepare the budget and submit it to
the Council and be responsible for its administration after adoption.
The City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, along with the other executive directors, known
as the Budget Lead Team (BLT), develop the guidelines, consistent with the policies, to be
used for budget preparation. During the development of the budget, various department and
division representatives may be called upon to provide their expertise.
From April through June, City staff from all departments and divisions prepares the Offers
(budget requests) for inclusion in the budget.
1.5 Budgeting Control System
No appropriation may be made by the Council which exceeds the revenues, reserves or other
funds anticipated or available at the time of the appropriation, except for emergency
expenses incurred by reason of a casualty, accident or unforeseen contingency arising after
the passage of the annual appropriation ordinance (Charter Article V, Section 8 (a)).
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
6
Control of expenditures is exercised at the fund level. Fund managers are responsible for all
expenditures made against appropriations within their fund and can allocate available
resources within the fund.
All appropriations unexpended or unencumbered at the end of the fiscal year shall lapse to
the applicable general or special fund, except for:
• appropriations for capital projects do not lapse until the completion of the capital project;
and
• federal or state grants do not lapse until the expiration of the federal or state grant
(Charter Article V, Section 11).
A. Budget Transfers
Between Funds or Capital Projects
During the fiscal year, the Council may, by ordinance, upon the recommendation of the City
Manager, transfer any unexpended and unencumbered appropriated amount or portion
thereof from one fund or capital project account to another fund or capital project account
provided that:
1) the purpose for which the transferred funds are to be expended remains unchanged;
2) the purpose for which the funds were initially appropriated no longer exists; or
3) the proposed transfer is from a fund or capital project account in which the amount
appropriated exceeds the amount needed to accomplish the purpose specified in the
appropriation ordinance (Charter Article V, Section 10 (b)).
Within a Fund
Budget control is maintained at the departmental level. The City Manager may, during the
fiscal year, transfer any unexpended and unencumbered appropriated amount within the
same fund (Charter Article V, Section 10(a)). The Chief Financial Officer also has the authority
to approve departmental expenses greater than the budget for that department so long as the
overall expenses in the fund serving that department are less than the budgeted amount for
the fund. In no case may the total expenditures of a particular fund exceed that which is
appropriated by the City Council (Charter Article V, Section 8(b)).
B. Applicable Amendments to the Budget
Budget Increases
There generally are four opportunities during the fiscal year for supplemental additions to
the current year annual appropriation approved by Council:
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
7
1) The first is through the encumbrance carry-forward process whereby approved purchase
orders that cannot be executed prior to the end of the fiscal year will have available
budget carried forward into the new year.
2) The second is usually adopted in March/April to re-appropriate funds from the previous
year’s ending balance for projects or obligations that were approved but not completed
during that year.
3) The third opportunity in the 2nd half of the year is used to fine-tune (clean-up) the
current fiscal year for previously unforeseen events. In addition, if revenue is received
during the fiscal year from a source that was not anticipated at the time of budget
adoption or appropriation for the fiscal year, such as grants or implementation of a new
fee, Council may appropriate that unanticipated revenue for expenditure when received
anytime during the year.
4) Lastly, the Council, upon recommendation of the City Manager, may make supplemental
appropriations by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year; provided, however, that
the total amount of such supplemental appropriations, in combination with all previous
appropriations for that fiscal year, shall not exceed the then current estimate of actual
and anticipated revenues to be received by the city during the fiscal year. This provision
shall not prevent the Council from appropriating by ordinance at any time during the
fiscal year such funds for expenditure as may be available from reserves accumulated in
prior years, notwithstanding that such reserves were not previously appropriated
(Charter Article V, Section 9).
Budget Decreases/Frozen Appropriations
The budget may be decreased below adopted appropriations during the fiscal year due to
changes in service demand, changes in economic conditions, and/or changes in Council goals.
Each service area is responsible for developing a plan to reduce appropriati ons, which will
be ready for implementation should the need arise. If the City Manager directs budget
reductions, Council will be informed and the appropriations will be “set aside” through
administrative action. While the appropriation amount is not changed, expenditures shall
not exceed the reduced amount recommended by the City Manager.
C. Order of Funding when Multiple Funding Sources Available
Sometimes a given project or program has multiple sources of funding available. Examples
of such projects include but are not limited to grant funded projects, jointly funded
projects/programs between governmental and proprietary funds, or projects/programs
where both dedicated tax and/or fee revenues and General Fund tax revenues are available.
Unless stated otherwise within the authorizing ordinance, budget offer, or a contractual
agreement, funding sources will be applied in the order of most-constrained to least-
constrained in the judgment of City staff. For example, a project jointly funded by the
Financial Policy 1 – Budget
8
General Fund and the Natural Areas Fund would first fund project spending using all
available and appropriated Natural Areas revenues prior to spending appropriated General
Fund revenues. This is in an effort to maximize the benefit of available sources in
accordance with the principles described in section 1.2 above.
1.6 Balanced Budget Definition
All funds are required to balance. As such, total anticipated revenues must equal the sum of
budgeted expenditures for each fund. Revenues are derived from two sources: current
revenue charges and unallocated reserves carried forward from prior years.
1.7 Contingency Planning for Unanticipated Revenue Shortfalls
During times when the City experiences significant unanticipated revenue shortfalls, a
contingency plan will be developed that outlines the necessary steps to align expenditures to
meet the actual revenue received. The contingency plan will target the funds being impacted
by the revenue shortfall. In general, the priority order of the steps in our contingency
methodology are:
• Align ongoing expenditures with anticipated ongoing revenue
• Sweep vacancy savings and non-service related savings such as fuel or utilities if under
budget
• If a Contingency Reserve has been established, utilize a portion of that reserve
• Develop a stop doing list utilizing the drilling platform prioritization.
• At a Service Area level, reduce expenditures related to
o discretionary expenditures
o new hires/vacancies (postponement of posting positions)
o travel and training
o reduced levels of support to programs
Financial Management Policy 2
Revenue Issue Date:
Version: 4 DRAFT
Issued by: Revenue and Project
Manager
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
1
2.1 Limitations under TABOR (Taxpayer Bill of Rights)
A. Background
The City of Fort Collins’ revenue and expenditures are limited by Colorado’s Taxpayer’s Bill
of Rights in Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution (TABOR). While TABOR limits
both revenue and expenditures, its primary application is in limiting revenue collections.
Growth in revenue is limited to the increase in the Denver-Boulder-Greeley Consumer Price
Index plus local growth (new construction and annexation). This percentage is added to the
preceding year’s revenue base, giving the dollar limit allowed for revenue collection in the
ensuing year. Any revenue collected over the limit must be refunded to the residents unless
the voters approve the retention of the excess revenue. Federal grants or gifts to the City are
not included in the revenue limit. City enterprises (electric, water, wastewater and
stormwater utilities) are also exempt from the imposed limits. In 2003, the Golf Fund
revenue sources was considered for enterprise status for purposes of TABOR.
Objective:
Monitoring and controlling revenues is important to the City of Fort Collins. Through its revenue policy, the
City primarily aims to maintain a diversified revenue system which will protect it from possible short-term
fluctuations in any of its various revenue sources. To accomplish this, revenues are monitored on a
continuous basis. An understanding of the economic and legal factors which directly and indirectly affect
the level of revenue collections is an important part of the City’s revenue policy.
Applicability:
This policy applies to all City Revenues. This policy does/does not apply to or govern revenues generated by
City-owned general improvement districts, DDA, URA, PFA or Library District.
Authorized by:
City Council, Resolutions 1994-174, 2013-093, 2016-096, 2021-XXX
EXHIBIT B
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
2
B. ‘De-Brucing’
In November 1997, Fort Collins’ voters approved a ballot measure that allows the City to
retain revenues that exceed the growth limit imposed by TABOR. The measure specified that
any retained revenues over the growth limit must be used for certain designated purposes.
• Public Health and Safety (including, but not limited to, environmental monitoring
and mitigation)
• Transportation
• Growth Management
• Maintenance and Repair of Public Facilities
C. TABOR Notice for New Tax or Tax Increase
• Develop revenue forecasts that are reasonable and factor in the implications of over
collection.
• Review these forecasts with the appropriate leadership staff.
D. Monitor New Tax Revenue
• Staff will monitor actual revenue against the forecast revenue disclosed in the TABOR
notice.
• In the second year, confirm first years’ actual revenue to forecast and determine if any
action is needed. Provide a report to the City Council with results and any
recommended action.
E. TABOR Legislation and Judicial Decisions
Staff shall monitor new TABOR legislation, judicial decisions and actions taken by other
governments to see if they affect the City. This will include working with the City’s outside
consultants, such as special bond counsel and CML. When such matters are discovered
affecting the City, staff will confer to determine what actions, if any, the City should take in
response.
F. Documentation of ‘Fiscal Year Spending’ under TABOR
Although the City has de-Bruced, current interpretations of TABOR section 20(3)(c) merits
the need for the ongoing calculation of “fiscal year spending”. Staff will maintain and update
records annually to calculate the City’s fiscal year spending under TABOR . These records
shall be kept for at least six years. Also, documentation shall be kept current that defines
which related agencies, funds and types of revenues are required under TABOR to be
included in fiscal year spending and those that can be excluded.
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
3
2.2 Revenue Review, Objectives and Monitoring
A. Review and Projections
The City reviews estimated revenue and fee schedules as part of the budget process.
The major revenue sources in the General Fund are sales and use tax, property tax,
lodging tax, intergovernmental revenues, fines and forfeitures, user fees and charges,
and transfers from other funds. Conservative revenue projections are made for the
budget term. The projections are monitored and updated as necessary.
B. Principles
The City has established six (6) general principles that will be used to guide decisions on
revenue:
1. Develop and maintain stable revenue sources.
The City will strive to maintain stable revenue sources by:
a. Targeting revenue sources with minimal volatility
b. Monitoring current revenue sources for variability
c. Adjusting forecasts as necessary to accommodate unanticipated
increases and declines
d. Monitoring and adjusting expenditures for unanticipated revenue
gains/losses
2. Develop and maintain a diverse revenue base.
For all general government operations, the City will strive to maintain
diverse revenue sources. The City recognizes that becoming too dependent
upon one revenue source would make revenue yields more vulnerable to
economic cycles. Therefore, the City will strive to maintain diverse revenue
sources by:
a. Targeting revenue from multiple sources
b. Working to expand fee based revenue where possible
c. Working to minimize overdependence on any single revenue source
d. Staff will monitor dependency on sales and use tax to ensure an over
reliance does not occur
3. Cultivate revenue sources that are equitable among residents of different
economic levels.
The City will strive to preserve a revenue stream that does not overburden
low income residents by:
a. Providing low income residents with opportunities to participate in
programs through reduced fee structures and scholarships
b. Providing a Sales Tax on Food and Utility rebate to lessen the burden of
taxes and fees on low income residents
c. Ensuring fees do not exceed cost to provide service
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
4
4. Generate adequate revenue to maintain service levels in line with resident
expectations.
The City will generate adequate revenue to maintain core service levels by:
a. Ensuring fees for service do not exceed cost to provide service
b. Maintaining a cost recovery model
c. Monitoring service level performance annually through the Community
Scorecard
d. Regularly reviewing services to assess core vs. desired
5. Maintain healthy reserves.
The City will maintain healthy reserves by:
a. Adhering to State mandated reserve and internal reserve policies
b. Maintaining a Tabor (State) reserve for the General Fund of 3% or more
of the City’s fiscal year spending
c. Meeting City policy for the General Fund of an additional contingency of
60 days or 17% of next year’s adopted budgeted expenditures
6. Fees for Services are fairly born by those who use those services.
C. Monitoring
In an annual summary financial report the major sources revenue and the associated
percentages will be reviewed by the Council Finance Committee.
2.3 Fee Policy
As a home rule municipality, the City of Fort Collins has the ability to determine the extent to
which fees should be used to fund City facilities, infrastructure and services. There are two
kinds of fees that the City may establish: Impact Fees and Special Service Fees. Impact fees
are typically one-time charges levied by the City against new development. Impact fees are
based on current levels of service and act as a buy-in method for new development. The
revenue can only be used for capital infrastructure needs created by the impact of the new
development. However, the City may and does employ other methodologies legally available
to calculate its impact fees. Special service fees are charges imposed on persons or property
that are designed to defray the overall cost of the particular municipal service for which the
fee is imposed. This Policy sets forth principles for identifying: (1) the kinds of services for
which the City could appropriately impose fees; (2) methods for calculating the percentage
of costs to be recovered by such fees; and (3) the manner in which the fees should be allocated
among individual fee payers.
A. Fees should be cost related
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
5
The amount of a fee should not exceed the overall cost of providing the facility,
infrastructure or service for which the fee is imposed. Cost may include direct and
indirect costs. That is:
1. Costs which are directly related to the provision of the service; and,
2. Support costs which are more general in nature but provide support for the
provision of the service.
B. Percentage of cost recovery
The extent to which the total cost of service should be recovered through fees depends
upon the following factors:
1. The nature of the facilities, infrastructure or services. In the case of fees for
facilities, infrastructure as well as governmental and proprietary services, total cost
recovery may be warranted. In the case of governmental services, it may be
appropriate for a substantial portion of the cost of such services to be borne by the
City’s taxpayers, rather than the individual users of such services.
2. The nature and extent of the benefit to the fee payers. When a particular facility or
service results in substantial, immediate and direct benefit to fee payers, a higher
percentage of the cost of providing the facility or service should be recovered by the
fee. When a particular facility or service benefits not only the fee payer but also a
substantial segment of the community, lower cost recovery is warranted.
3. The level of demand for a particular service. Because the pricing of services can
significantly affect demand, full cost recovery for services is more appropriate when
the market for the services is strong and will support a high level of cost recovery.
4. Ease of collection. In the case of impact fees, ease of collection is generally not a
factor. In the case of fees for services, however, such fees may prove to be
impractical for the City to utilize if they are too costly to administer.
C. Establishment and Modification of Fees and Charges
The following Impact Fees imposed by the City are established by the City Council by
ordinance and may be modified only by ordinance of the City Council.
1. Six Capital Expansion Fees: Transportation, Neighborhood Park, Community Park,
Fire, Police and General Government
2. Five Utility Fees: Water Supply Requirement, Electric Capacity, Sewer Plant
Investment, Stormwater Plant Investment, Water Plant Investment
Fee updates occur on a regular two and four-year cadence and fee updates occur
together to provide a more holistic view of the impact of any fee increases. Detailed fee
study analysis for all six Capital Expansion Fees occurs every four years. This requires
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
6
an outside consultant through a request for proposal (RFP) process where data is
provided by City staff. Findings by the consultant are also verified by City staff. For
Utility Fees, a detailed fee study is planned every two years. These are internal updates
by City staff with periodic consultant verification. Fee study analysis will be targeted in
the odd year before Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO). In years without an update, an
inflation adjustment occurs.
The amounts of all other service and administrative fees may be determined by the City
Manager as provided in City Code Chapter 7.5, Article I, absent any provision of the City
Charter the contrary. Development Review/Building Fees follow the same four-year
cadence as the Capital Expansion Fees.
All fee revenues will be estimated by the City Manager and submitted to the City Council
as part of the City Manager’s recommended budget.
D. Rebate Programs
If the amount of a particular fee is considered to be too high to accommodate the needs
of particular segments of the community and the public interest would be served by
adjusting the amount or manner of payment of such fees in particular instances, the
amount of the fee may be waived, rebated, or deferred as appropriate. In the case of
fees established by ordinance, the criteria for waiving, rebating, or deferring payment
of such fees shall be established by the City Council by ordinance.
2.4 Sales and Use Tax Distribution
Sales and Use Tax shall be used and accounted for as intended by the voters. Details of how
the different segments of sales and use tax are used are outlined in the City Code Chapter 25.
The following is a summary for informational purposes only.
The City's Sales and Use Tax currently totals 3.85 cents on a $1.00 purchase, developed as
follows:
In effect through December 31, 2020
1968 - General City uses 1.00 cent
1980 - General City uses 1.00 cent
1982 - General City uses 0.25 cent
2015 - Street Maintenance 0.25 cent*
2015 - Community Capital Improvement Program 0.25 cent*
2006 - Natural Areas & Open Space 0.25 cent*
2011 - Keeping Fort Collins Great 0.85 cent**
3.85 cents
* Excludes sales and use tax on grocery food for home consumption
** Excludes sales and use tax on grocery food for home consumption and manufacturing
equipment
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
7
Taxes effective beginning January 1, 2021
Begin Through Uses Rate per $1.00
1968 No end General City Purposes 1.00 cent
1980 No end General City Purposes 1.00 cent
1982 No end General City Purposes 0.25 cent
2016 2025 Street Maintenance 0.25 cent *
2016 2025 Community Capital Improvement Program 0.25 cent *
2006 2029 Natural Areas & Open Space 0.25 cent *
2021 No end General City Purposes 0.60 cent **
2021 2030 General City Purposes 0.25 cent **
3.85 cents
* Excludes sales and use tax on grocery food for home consumption
** Excludes sales and use tax on grocery food for home consumption and manufacturing
equipment
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
8
2.5 Philanthropic Contributions
The City of Fort Collins (City) will pursue philanthropic support consistent with the City’s goals and
objectives, and in the best interests of Fort Collins residents. The City will always consider the public trust
and comply with all applicable laws when soliciting and accepting philanthropic donations.
Strong oversight of philanthropic gifts is a priority, and the City has created multiple layers of
accountability and transparency for donated funds and the projects receiving donated funds. Charitable
gifts to the City can only be used for the intended purpose designated by donors. Charitable gifts to the
City delivered directly into the budgets of benefiting projects, and can’t be redirected by elected officials
or City staff.
TheCity reserves the right to decline any charitable gift if, upon review, acceptance of the donation offer is d
etermined in the sole discretion of the City not to be in the best interests of the City.
In 2019, the City of Fort Collins adopted Administrative Policy 52-City Give to create standards and
protocols for the acceptance and governance of charitable gifts, and for the orchestration of
philanthropic practices. Additionally, the City adopted Finance Governance Policy to establish protocols
for City Give, staff and officials regarding the acceptance and documentation of philanthropic gifts, and
procedures to responsibly and efficiently manage charitable gifts.
Financial Policy 2 – Revenue
9
Getting Help
Please contact the Revenue and Project Manager with any questions at 970.221.6626.
Related Policies/References
City Code Chapter 25 Taxation, Article III Sales & Use Tax
City Code Chapter 26 Utilities
Administrative Fee
Definitions
Governmental Services: services provided by the City for the public good such as regulating land use,
maintaining streets, and providing police and fire protection.
Impact Fees: usually one-time charges, levied by the City against new development to offset the impacts of
the new developments
Proprietary Services: services provided for the benefit and enjoyment of the residents of the City, at their
discretion, such as parks and recreation services
Rebate: a return of a portion of a fee within a specified time. Unlike a waiver or discount, the rebate is given
after the fee has been paid in full
Special Service Fee: charges imposed on persons or property that are designed to defray the overall cost of
the particular municipal service for which the fee is imposed
Waiver: when a portion of a fee is reduced before being paid by a buyer
Financial Management Policy 3
General Financial Policies Issue Date: 11/21/17
Version: 5
Issued by: City Council
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
1
3.1 Administrative Charges
Certain General Fund departments render services to departments in other funds and shall
be equitably apportioned to those other funds. General Fund departments that do not have
a direct billing mechanism shall have their costs allocated using the formula outlined in this
section to other funds, and provide offsetting revenue in the General Fund.
A. General Fund Departmental Costs to be Allocated
Certain General Fund departmental costs to be allocated include City Council, City
Manager, City Clerk, City Attorney, Human Resources, and Finance. Any services in
these departments which are funded by user fees or dedicated revenues are excluded
from the allocation.
The amount of costs to be allocated is the current adopted budget for each of the
departments listed above less user fees and dedicated revenue. With a multi-year
budget, the charge to each fund is increased by a determined percentage for the second
future year and then adjusted to the actual calculation with the next multi-year budget.
B. How Costs Are Allocated
The Human Resources costs are allocated on a prorated basis to funds based on the total
number of budgeted full-time-equivalent positions in each fund.
Objective:
To outline the method and principles for allocation Administrative Charges; establishing the parameters for
the Medical and Retirement Program; Fund Organization; Cost Recovery and Fee Setting; and Capital
Improvement Program.
Applicability:
This policy applies to all City funds. It does not apply to URA, DDA, PFA and Library.
Authorized by:
City Council Resolution 2006-006, 2015-055, 2017-101, 2021-XXX
EXHIBIT C
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
2
All other General Fund administrative costs are allocated on a prorated basis to the
funds based upon adjusted expenditure budgets for the current year. Adjustments are
made to recognize the lower amount of administrative services required for Capital,
Debt Service, and Purchased Power payments. Capital project budgets are reduced by
two-thirds and averaged over three years. Debt Service budgets are reduced by three-
fourths and the entire Purchased Power budget is deducted from the Light & Power
budget.
C. All Funds Receive Allocations but Not All Funds Are Charged
While Administrative Charges are allocated among all City funds, only specified funds
are charged. Charges are not made to a fund if it is not self-supporting, it is a
Governmental Internal Service fund, or if the funds role is merely to facilitate proper
accounting procedures. For example, the Sales and Use Tax fund and Debt Service fund
receive amounts which are then transferred to other funds. Charging these funds would
lead to double charging many transactions and would not correspond to the level of
service provided by the departments in the General Fund.
D. Review
During each budget process, the Administrative Charge calculation will be reviewed by
the Budget Office. Minor refinements in the allocation formulas are made as needed.
Significant changes will be brought to the City Council for approval to assure that the
equitable apportionment meets requirements of the Code/Charter.
3.2 Medical Insurance and Retirement Plan
A. Medical Insurance
In 1981, the City of Fort Collins set up a partially self-funded medical insurance program.
The objective of a self-funding program is to reduce the cost of medical insurance by
assuming the risk for certain plan expenses. Assuming a portion of the risk lowers the
amount of charges compared to a conventional full insurance plan Historically, the City has
found this funding method to be a cost-effective means of providing a very desirable
employee benefit.
To administer the self-funded and insured portions of the medical insurance plans, the City
conducts a competitive proposal process every five years or more often if required. The
insurance contracts are reviewed annually for both performance and cost. The types of
services contracted for include plan administrative services, stop-loss protection against
larger claims, life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance, and long-term
disability coverage.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
3
B. Retirement Programs
The City of Fort Collins contributes to two types of retirement plans: a Defined Benefit Plan
and Defined Contribution Plans.
1. Defined Benefit Plan - the General Employees Retirement Plan (Plan). The pension
plan is closed to new participants as of 1/1/1999.
The Plan document approved by the City Council outlines the details of the program. A
Board meets monthly to oversee the program. Board members, in consultation with annual
actuary report and other information, make recommendations to City Council for any plan
changes that may be needed from time to time. The Plan currently calls for the employer
(City) to contribute 10.5%. Because the plan is underfunded, a Supplemental Contribution
is made at a fixed dollar amount each year. The Supplemental amount is reevaluated every
2 years in conjunction with the budget cycle and based on the latest actuarial valuation
report.
2. 401(a) and 457 Money Purchase Plans. Also known as Defined Contribution Plans,
the contribution rates are as follows:
401 a 457
Employee Group Employer Employee Waiting Employer Employee Waiting
Classified Employees 6.5% 3.0% 6 months 0.0% optional no wait
Classified Employees hired
on or before 3/31/07
7.5% 3.0% 6 months 0.0% optional no wait
Unclassified Management 6.5% 6.0% no wait 0.0% optional no wait
Unclassified Management
hired on or before 3/31/07
7.5% 6.0% no wait 0.0% optional no wait
Direct Reports of City Council 10.0% 0.0% no wait match up to
3%
optional no wait
Service Area Directors 10.0% 0.0% no wait match up to
3%
optional no wait
Police & Dispatch (per union
agreement) *
10.5% 8.5% no wait match up to
3%
optional 6
months
for
match
Community Service Officer 8.0% 3.0% 6 months 0.0% optional no wait
* All employee groups vest immediately, except Police and Dispatch who follow schedule in
union agreement.
Employee contributions to the 457 plan are limited to the amounts published by the IRS.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
4
The City will contract with a third party administrator to provide the Defined Contribution Plans.
City Staff comprised of both Finance and HR will oversee the program and performance of the third
party administrator.
3.3 Fund Organization
Funds for accounting and financial reporting purposes have their own balance sheet and income
statement.
The organization of the City’s Funds is designed to enhance accountability and transparency,
comply with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, meet grant requirements, comply with City
Code/Charter and comply with Colorado statutes. In City Article V, Section 25 the Financial Officer
is empowered to create funds as appropriate. However, City Code Chapter 8, Article III also
establishes additional parameters for City funds.
The number of funds established should be the minimum needed for legal and operating
requirements. Unnecessary funds can result in inflexibility, undue complexity and inefficient
financial administration.
The City’s funds are organized at two levels of groupings; Fund Groups and Fund Types.
Fund Groups
Governmental Funds Used to account for activities primarily supported by taxes, grants and similar
revenue sources.
Proprietary Funds Used to account for activities that receive significant support from fees and
charges.
Fiduciary Funds Used to account for resources that a City holds as a trustee or agent on behalf of an
outside party that cannot be used to support the City’s own programs.
Within each Fund Group are Fund Types.
Governmental Fund Types
General Fund Main operating fund used to account for and report all financial resources not
accounted for and reported in another fund.
Special Revenue
Funds
Used to account for and report the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are
restricted, committed or assigned to expenditure for specific purposes, other than
debt service or capital projects.
Debt Service Funds Used to account for and report resources that are restricted, committed or
assigned to expenditure for principal and interest.
Capital Project Funds Used to account for and report resources that are restricted, committed or
assigned to expenditure for capital outlays, including the acquisition or
construction of capital facilities or other capital assets.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
5
Proprietary Fund Types
Enterprise Funds Used to account and report any activity for which a fee is charged to external users
of goods and services
Internal Service
Funds
Used to account and report any activity for which a fee is charged to other funds,
departments, or agencies of the City and its component units on a cost
reimbursement basis.
Fiduciary Fund Types
Pension (and Other
Employee Benefit)
Trust Funds
Used to account and report resources that are required to be held in trust for the
members and beneficiaries of defined benefit plans.
Custodial Funds Used to report resources held by the City in a purely custodial capacity.
The following is a list of all funds of the City, including legally separate entities but from a financial
reporting perspective are treated as a component unit of the City.
Group and Type Legal Ref. Name
Governmental
General Fund City 100 General Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 250 Capital Expansion Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 251 Sales & Use Tax Fund
Special Revenue Fund Separate 252 General Improvement District #1
Special Revenue Fund City 254 Keep Fort Collins Great Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 255 Community Capital Improvement
Program
Special Revenue Fund City 272 Natural Areas Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 273 Cultural Services & Facilities
Special Revenue Fund City 274 Recreation Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 275 Cemeteries Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 276 Perpetual Care Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 277 Museum Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 280 Community Development Block
Special Revenue Fund City 281 Home Investment Partnership
Special Revenue Fund City 290 Transit Services Fund
Special Revenue Fund City 291 Transportation Capital Expansion Fee
Special Revenue Fund City 292 Transportation Services Fund
Special Revenue Fund Separate 293 GID #15 - Skyview
Special Revenue Fund City 294 Parking Fund
Debt Service City 304 Capital Leasing Corporation
Capital Projects Fund City 400 Capital Projects Fund
Capital Projects Fund City 270 Neighborhood Parkland Fund
Capital Projects Fund City 271 Conservation Trust Fund
Proprietary
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
6
Enterprise Fund City 500 Golf Fund
Enterprise Fund City 501 Electric and Telecommunications
Fund
Enterprise Fund City 502 Water Fund
Enterprise Fund City 503 Wastewater Fund
Enterprise Fund City 504 Storm Drainage Fund
Enterprise Fund City 505 Broadband Fund
Internal Service Fund City 601 Equipment Fund
Internal Service Fund City 602 Self-Insurance Fund
Internal Service Fund City 603 Data and Communications Fund
Internal Service Fund City 604 Benefits Fund
Internal Service Fund City 605 Utility Customer Service & Admin
Fiduciary
Pension Trust Fund City 700 Employees' Retirement Fund
Governmental
Special Revenue Fund Separate 800 URA - N. College District
Special Revenue Fund Separate 801 URA - Prospect South TIF District
Special Revenue Fund Separate 803 URA - Mall Fund
Special Revenue Fund Separate 820 DDA Operating Fund
Special Revenue Fund Separate 821 DDA Fixed Asset and Long Term Debt
Special Revenue Fund Separate 822 DDA Debt Service Fund
3.4 Cost Recovery and Fee Setting
A. Enterprise Funds shall rely on charges and user fees to recover their costs, rather than
taxes. Utility rates will be based upon the cost of service approach to reflect full distribution
of costs to appropriate rate classes in order to effect equitable sharing of costs. Rates shall
be established and maintained at a level sufficient to maintain positive net income in each of
the utility funds after paying the full cost of operating and maintaining the utilities and
keeping them in good repair and working order. Such rates shall also be sufficient to enable
each utility, where applicable, to meet rate requirements of City or utility enterprise bond
ordinances.
B. The Internal Service Funds shall operate under the following guidelines.
1. Internal service fund charges are limited to the recovery of the cost of the service, including
depreciation, rather than making a profit. Each fund's prior year financial statements and
estimates of future costs form the basis for the calculation of charges.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
7
2. Charges should be set at a level to avoid significant adverse financial impacts on their
customers. Fund customers and independent experts should be allowed to review and make
recommendations about the level of charges. The Finance Department should approve the
analysis and conclusions used to set rates.
3. Internal service funds should compete with similar services offered by the private sector.
The City staff will compare rates every five years. If not competitive with the private sector, the
Finance Department will analyze whether the private sector should provide the service.
4. Internal service funds may build up reserves. Customer-approved master plans and
independent third-party actuarial reviews (for the Benefit and Self-Insurance funds) guide the
level of reserves. Fund managers may spend reserves only for their approved purpose.
5. The City may buy equipment and facilities for the internal service funds through lease-
purchase financing. Management's decision to recommend lease-purchase financing depends
on: (1) cash flow needs; (2) budget constraints; (3) benefit to cost analysis; and (4) level of
reserves.
6. Except for the Utilities Customer Service and Administration Fund, Internal service funds
operate under the same guidelines and constraints as the General Fund and other governmental
funds of the City. The Utilities Customer Service and Administration Fund shall operate under
the guidelines of the Utilities Services Funds.
C. Cultural Services & Facilities Fund Fee Policy
1. Total revenue from fees and charges shall cover a minimum of 55% of Lincoln
Center Operation and Maintenance and Performing and Visual Arts Programming Budgets.
This includes revenues generated at the Lincoln Center from rentals, equipment,
concessions and other miscellaneous sources and all total direct revenues from the
Performing and Visual Arts Programming. A transfer from the General Fund will make up
the difference between total revenue and expenditures.
2. The Cultural Services and Facilities Administration and Museum budgets provide
minimal financial support. These programs are funded primarily by a transfer from the
General Fund.
3. Major capital improvements and renovations will be financed through sources other
than Cultural Services and Facilities Fund.
4. Charitable gifts and donations—raised from the philanthropic sector of foundations,
corporations, and individuals to support public initiatives of the City of Fort Collins—will be
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
8
made directly to the City of Fort Collins. Acceptance, stewardship, tracking, and expenditures of
all charitable gifts are governed by Philanthropic Administrative and City Give Finance
Governance Policy with great attention to transparency and accountability.
D. Recreation Fund Rates and Charges Policy
Recreation Rates and Charges shall cover between 68% to 75% of all operating costs, with the
difference to be covered by the City’s General Fund and/or 50% of the Keep Fort Collins Great
portion dedicated to Parks & Recreation. Equipment and rolling stock shall be considered
operating costs in the application of this policy. Recreation Rates and Charges shall not be expected
to cover major capital items such as facility and land acquisitions, major renovations to facilities or
other costs such as utilities, custodial or grounds maintenance.
3.5 Capital Improvement Program
1. Each Service Area or Department shall develop multi-year Master Plans for capital
improvements. On a city-wide basis, staff shall compile a 10-year Capital Improvement
Plan and update it every two years. Estimates of operating and maintenance costs
should be included;
2. Appropriation requests must include not only the cost of construction or acquisition
and the funding sources, but an estimate of operating and maintenance costs;
3. Capital improvements projects will be administered in accordance with the Capital
Projects Procedures Manual;
4. Appropriations for capital improvements will be constructed and expenditures incurred
only for the purpose as approved by City Council;
5. Staff should seek out grants and partnerships whenever appropriate.
3.6 Using State Allocation of Private Activity Bonds
A. Background: Conduit debt is issued in a local government’s name, but the resources for
repayment come from individuals or entities that are not part of government. Entities seek
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
9
conduit debt because of the government’s ability to issue debt at favorable tax-exempt
rates. Private Activity Bonds (PAB) are a form of conduit debt.
Colorado’s Private Activity Bond allocation program is established by the Colorado Private
Activity Bond Ceiling Allocation Act, Section 24-32-1701, et seq., C.R.S. Pursuant to Section
24-32-1706, annually the City of Fort Collins is offered a portion of the State ceiling as a
local government. If the City does not issue bonds or assign bond capacity to an entity for a
local project by September 15th annually, the cap automatically reverts back to the state’s
pool.
Historically, the City has provided this capacity on a first come first serve basis. It has not
been uncommon for the City to receive no requests. Because more partners are using
programs that can benefit from the lower interest rate that PAB’s offer, the City is
establishing this process.
B. Purpose: PAB’s allow certain private sector activities to receive lower interest rates. PAB’s
may be used for affordable housing development and rehabilitation, specific economic
development programs and for industrial development purposes, among other permitted
uses. The City will attempt to find local uses for this development tool.
C. Communication: Information about the program should be placed on the City’s website
(fcgov.com). Consideration for other advertising and communication methods may be
appropriate.
D. Awarding and Assigning: Awarding PAB and Assigning PAB allocations are different
processes. Assigning PAB to another qualified issuer is strongly preferred. This is to reduce
the administrative investments and leverage the efficiency of qualified issuers who award
PAB’s regularly. If an entity applies for a direct award under the City’s name, staff will
attempt to find a qualified issuer that agrees to accept an assignment from the City and
issue the PAB under their own authority.
E. Application due date: Written applications to use of Fort Collin’s annual PAB allocation are
due to the City’s Chief Sustainability Officer by March 15th.
F. Application Elements:
a. The following items are required when applying for both assignments and direct
awards.
i. A request letter signed by applicant describing the project the PAB would be
used for and including: the applicant’s name, address, phone, email address,
and principal contact.
ii. Amount of allocation being requested.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
10
iii. Bond counsel firm name, address, phone, email address and principal
contact.
iv. Description of Applicant’s local projects and years of operation
v. Number of years’ entity has been doing business in State of Colorado
vi. Provide a Certificate of Good Standing from the Secretary of State’s office.
vii. Description of assets to be purchased or constructed and expenses
incidental to the project, including the sale of bonds.
viii. Explanation of how the project aligns with City objectives.
ix. Number of housing units and target demographics
x. Statement from competent bond counsel that the project is eligible for
qualified private activity bonds.
b. The following additional items are required in applications for direct awards of PAB:
Debt Information
xi. Name, address, phone of principal contact of the proposed underwriter or
lender.
xii. Anticipated timetable for bond transaction.
xiii. Estimated bond redemption and interest payment schedule
xiv. Indicate the type of letter of credit or similar instrument, which will back the
debt
xv. Disclose if the applicant is involved in any litigation which may affect the
validity or repayment of the bonds.
Financial Information
xvi. Audited financial statements for the applicant for the last three years and
interim statements for the current year. If not available, please explain why.
xvii. Projection of future revenues, expenditures and debt service coverage for
the next five years supported by a feasibility study.
Other
xviii. Describe the arrangements that will ensure compliance with arbitrage
reporting and payment requirements.
xix. Name, address and principal contact person for applicant’s local bank.
xx. Briefly describe any potential conflicts of interest of personal/ professional/
political relationships between the applicant’s officers and/or directors or
applicant’s operations and the City of Fort Collins.
xxi. Any other information which provides evidence of the applicant’s ability to
repay the bonds and complete the project.
Debt Security
xxii. All arbitrage calculations and payments must be performed by the trustee
under the terms of the trust agreement or by any such other arrangement
that will ensure compliance. The City must be provided with copies of 8088-
T’s filed with the IRS.
xxiii. The private entity must provide the City with information on the status of
the debt annually and upon any material event.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
11
xxiv. The bond documents must indemnify the City against IRS assessments and
legal fees arising from the financing.
xxv. The issuer’s agent will be responsible for all continuing disclosure
requirements.
c. Items missing from application may result in disqualification from consideration.
G. Fees: There are no fees for applications that request assignments to another qualifying
issuer. However, the following fees apply to applications requesting a direct award of PAB
from the City of Fort Collins.
a. Issuance fee equal to the greater of: A. 0.25% of the par amount of the debt, or B.
$5,000. The fee is capped at $25,000.
b. The cost of a review of the financing by an independent fiscal agent (to be selected
by the City)
c. Any other direct cost incurred by the City related to the financing.
d. There will not be additional issuance fees for any amendment or modification of the
original transaction even if it requires official action by City Council, except for
actual direct costs of the City.
H. Review Process
a. PAB Committee: Applications will be reviewed by a committee of at least 3 people.
Members will include at least one representative each from Social Sustainability,
Economic Health and Finance. Representatives from other departments, such as the
City Manager’s Office will be added as needed. Service Area Directors will make the
necessary appointments to the PAB Committee.
b. At a minimum, the following factors should be considered by the PAB Committee
when making a recommendation:
i. How well the project applied for meets the land use, economic development
and/or affordable housing goals of the City of Fort Collins.
ii. Project feasibility and timing.
iii. Leverage of other investment into the project.
iv. Maintenance of or increase in local tax base.
v. Competing uses for the City’s allocation.
vi. Whether the City’s allocation should be used in multiple projects.
vii. Whether the application should be considered by any City Board or
commission.
c. The PAB Committee will decide on a recommendation no later than July 1.
d. City Council shall approve all PAB assignments or direct awards. The PAB
Committee shall submit their recommendations to the City Council no later than
August 15.
Financial Policy 3 – General Financial Policies
12
Getting Help
Please contact the Controller with any questions at 970.416.4354.
Financial Management Policy 5
Fund Balance Minimums Issue Date: 11/21/17
Version: 5
Issued by: City Council
Financial Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums
1
5.1 Governmental Funds and Fund Balances
To set minimum fund balances so as to mitigate risks, maintain good standing with
rating agencies, and ensure cash is available when revenue is unavailable. The policy
sets minimum fund balances, not targets or maximum balances. Each fund should be
evaluated by staff to determine the appropriateness of maintaining fund balances above
the minimums set in this policy. Contingencies for severe weather, prolonged drought,
and anticipated capital spending should be considered independently from this policy.
The Equity on balance sheet of a governmental fund is called Fund Balance. The current
classifications of Fund Balance in governmental funds are primarily based on the origin
of the constraints. The following categories are in decreasing order of constraints.
Non-Spendable Permanent endowments or assets in a non-liquid form
Restricted Involve a third party: State Legislation or
Contractual Agreements
Committed Set by formal action of the City Council
Assigned By staff, and/or residual balances in a Special Revenue Fund
Unassigned Remaining balances in governmental funds
Objective:
To set minimum fund balances as to mitigate risk, maintain good standing with rating agencies, and ensure
cash is available when revenue is unavailable. The policy sets minimum fund balances, not targets or
maximum balances. Each fund should be evaluated by staff to determine the appropriateness of
maintaining fund balances above the minimums set in this policy. Contingencies for severe weather,
prolonged drought, and anticipated capital spending should be considered independently from this policy.
Applicability:
Funds—This policy applies to all City funds. It does not apply to URA, DDA, PFA and Library.
Authorized by:
City Council Resolutions 1994-174, 2008-038, 2014-058,2017-101, 2021-XXX
EXHIBIT D
Financial Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums
2
Minimums outlined in section 5.3 relate only to Assigned and Unassigned balances.
5.2 Proprietary Fund and Working Capital
Internal Service Funds and Enterprise Funds are accounted for nearly identical to the
private sector. The balance sheets include long term assets and long term liabilities.
The resulting Equity section on their balance sheet, called Net Position, is not always a
good measure of spendable financial resources. To get to spendable financial resources,
a common calculation is to take Current Assets and subtract Current Liabilities, with the
net result called Working Capital.
To further refine, for purposes of this policy, certain required restrictions are further
subtracted and result in Available Working Capital. Some examples of required
restrictions are unspent monies for Art in Public Places, Water Rights, and existing
appropriations for capital projects. The minimums outlined in section 5.3 relate to
Available Working Capital.
5.3 Minimum Balances
The following Minimum Balances refers to Assigned and Unassigned Fund Balances in
governmental funds and Available Working Capital in the Internal Service Funds and
Enterprise Funds.
A. General Fund
60 Day Liquidity Goal - The Commitment for Contingency should be at least 60 days
(17%) of the subsequent year’s originally adopted budgeted expenditures and transfers
out. The calculation for the minimum level shall exclude expenditures and transfers out
for large and unusual one-time items.
Important note – the 60 Day Liquidity Goal is in addition to the Emergency Reserves
required by Article X, Section 20(5) of the State Constitution. This reserve must equal
3% of non-exempt revenue and can only be used for declared emergencies. Fiscal
emergencies are specifically excluded by the State Constitution as qualifying use of this
reserve.
B. Special Revenue Funds
No minimum balance is required.
Financial Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums
3
C. Debt Service Funds
No minimum balance is required.
D. Capital Project Funds
No minimum balance is required.
E. Enterprise Funds
Enterprise funds focus on working capital rather than fund balance.
Enterprise Funds shall maintain a minimum Available Working Capital equal to 25% of
Operating Expenses, less Depreciation. Exception1: In the case of L&P, operating
expenses will include purchased renewable energy for resale but will not include
regular purchased power for resale (i.e. Platte River Power Authority). Exception 2: In
the case of Golf, the minimum fund balance will be 12.5%.
Important note – The Water Fund holds a balance for Restricted Water Rights. The
balance equals the amount of cash in-lieu-of water rights payments and raw water
surcharges less any expenses for acquiring water rights and water storage;
The enterprises funds should also be accumulating available working capital above
these minimums for the purposes of funding future capital projects.
F. Internal Service Funds
Each fund is a unique operation and will maintain a minimum Available Working Capital
as follows:
601 Equipment Fund 8.3% Of annual operating expenses, excluding
depreciation
602 Self-Insurance Fund * 25.0% Of annual operating expenses
603 Data & Communications
Fund
0.0% N/A
604 Benefits Fund 30.0% Of annual medical and dental expenses
605 Utility Customer Service
Fund
0.0% N/A
* Self Insurance Fund will be measured against Available Unrestricted Net Position
instead of Available Working Capital.
Financial Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums
4
5.4 Below Minimum
When circumstances result in balances below the minimum, staff should develop a plan
to restore minimums fund balances and present it to Council Finance Committee.
Financial Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums
5
Definitions
Non Spendable Fund Balances: Applicable to governmental funds. Permanent endowments or assets in a
non-liquid form such as long term inter-agency loans.
Restricted Fund Balances: Applicable to governmental funds. Involve a third party such as State
Legislative requirements, voter ballot language, or the Contractual Agreements with parties
external to the City.
Committed Fund Balances: Applicable to governmental funds. Involve a of formal action by the City
Council. An example is traffic calming revenues are required to be spent on traffic calming
activities. Any unspent monies at end of year are classified as Committed to traffic calming in the
General Fund.
Assigned Fund Balances: Are applicable to governmental funds. Assignments can be made by senior
management. They represent the intent to use the monies for a specific purpose. An example of this
it this the one time Harmony Road monies transferred by the State to the City. Although required to
be used on Harmony Road, staff intends to use the monies only on Harmony Road improvements.
These monies are considered when measuring compliance with minimum fund balances.
Unassigned Fund Balances: Are applicable only to the governmental funds. These monies are considered
when measuring compliance with minimum fund balances.
Working Capital: Is a term applicable to Internal Service and Enterprise Funds. It is the difference
between Current Assets and Current Liabilities. Not all Working Capital is available. Available
Working Capital does not include Restrictions for debt, Art in Public Places, approved capital
appropriations, and other restrictions.
Unrestricted Net Position: Is a term applicable to Internal Service and Enterprise Funds. Not all
Unrestricted Net Position is available. Available Unrestricted Net Position does not include unused
Art in Public Places monies, approved capital appropriations, and other commitments.
Liquidity: Assets range from cash to land. The more easily and quickly an asset can be converted to cash
determines its relative liquidity.
Reserves: A legacy term that previously referred to fund balances, or fund balances set aside for a specific
purpose. It is no longer used on financial statements.
Fund Balance: Is a term applicable to governmental funds. Fund balance or Equity is the difference
between assets ,liabilities, deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources. Since
governmental funds do not have long term assets and long term debt on their balance sheet, fund
balance is similar and approximates working capital in the private sector and enterprise funds.
Financial Policy 5 – Fund Balance Minimums
6
Getting Help
Please contact the Controller with any questions at 970.221.6772.