HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 01/19/2021 - SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 010, 2021 ADOPTINGItem # 9 Page 1
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Agenda Item 8
January 19, 2021
City Council
STAFF
Honore Depew, Interim Policy and Project Manager
John Stokes, Natural Resources Director
Ingrid Decker, Legal
SUBJECT
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 010, 2021 Adopting the Update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan as
an Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on January 5, 2021, adopts an update to the Parks
and Recreation Master Plan and highlights key implementation steps post-adoption.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading.
ATTACHMENTS
1.First Reading Agenda I tem Summary, January 5, 2021 (w/o attachments)(PDF)
2.Ordinance No. 010, 2021 (PDF)
Agenda Item 17
Item # 17 Page 1
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY January 5, 2021
City Council
STAFF
Honore Depew, Interim Policy and Project Manager
John Stokes, Natural Resources Director
Ingrid Decker, Legal
SUBJECT
First Reading of Ordinance No. 010, 2021 Adopting the Update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan as an
Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this item is to consider adoption of an update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and
highlight key implementation steps post-adoption.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading.
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
The Parks and Recreation Policy Plan (now called a Master Plan) was last updated in 2009. The current update
effort began in late 2019 and a final version is now ready for adoption by Ordinance. Council held previous
discussions on the development of the Master Plan in October 2019, June 2020, August 2020, and October
2020. (Attachment 1). The Parks and Recreation Master Plan is an element of City Plan, the City’s
comprehensive plan.
Over the last year, staff has been working with a consultant team, stakeholders, and the community to thoroughly
assess our system of parks and recreation facilities in an iterative and engaging process. The result is the
comprehensive yet approachable Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan examines
parks and recreation needs in the context of the City’s extensive system of public spaces and articulates an
ambitious yet attainable vision for parks and recreation in the future. To implement this vision, the Plan weaves
together strategies, guidelines, and decision-making tools that the City can use as a road map to shape the park
and recreation system over the next 20 years.
Key Plan Outcomes:
Updated design guidelines for parks and recreational facilities
o A reference guide to help build and refresh parks and recreational facilities to meet community
expectations.
New system for classifying parks and recreational facilities.
o Helps ensure that parks and recreational facilities are connected to their surroundings, have a strong
community presence, and respect natural systems.
Guidelines for evaluating and managing the total cost of ownership of parks and recreational facilities.
ATTACHMENT 1
Agenda Item 17
Item # 17 Page 2
o Includes a detailed Capital Improvement Plan and asset management strategies (Refresh & Lifecycle)
Assessment of current service standards and recommendations for future amenities.
o Provides a snapshot of how well the community is being served by current public space amenities and
a road map for addressing the number and location of amenities in the future
Funding tools and opportunities for further consideration.
o Includes diverse future funding solutions to consider in support of system development, maintenance,
replacement, and programing
A new vision statement for Parks and Recreation that represents a holistic framework for the City’s system
of public space
o The Plan also honors the role of individual departments and funding sources.
Many recommendations for actions and policies to support the Plan vision. A few examples include:
o More Natural Parks
o Strengthened Operational Partnerships
o A potential Downtown festival space
Next Steps
Develop an internal team to analyze potential funding solutions from the Master Plan.
Review options with Council and the public in 2021.
CITY FINANCIAL IMPACTS
The Plan charts a vision for the future and clearly articulates the need to assure the financial sustainability of the
system. Implementation of plan recommendations will be based on exploration of specific funding tools and
opportunities, as reviewed by Council and the community in 2021.
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The development of the Plan relied upon an interdisciplinary group of board and commission members.
Representatives from a dozen boards were part of a temporary advising group known as the Advance Review
Committee. These board members acted as liaisons to their respective boards for feedback and regular updates.
Additionally, staff engaged directly with key boards, such as the Parks & Recreation Board throughout the
planning process.
The Natural Resources Advisory Board (NRAB) submitted a memo to Council dated December 23, 2020
(Attachment 2) expressing support for the Plan and calling for more “aspirational” policy statements regarding
native plantings and softscape design. The Plan currently calls for more natural park design in several sections,
including those referenced in the NRAB memo. The language in the Policy Framework section is intended to
promote such design without restricting staff and contractors when implementing best practices.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Phase 1: Big Picture Thinking - INVOLVE
Winter 2019 - Summer 2020
Goal: Utilize several different engagement tools to help the community guide development of the Master Plan.
● Survey - A statistically valid survey was deployed at the end of 2019. From the 511 responses received, the
results achieved a demographically representative sample of the community with a confidence level of 95%
and precision of +/- 4.33%. Results from the survey demonstrate how highly residents value the system of
Agenda Item 17
Item # 17 Page 3
parks and recreational facilities in Fort Collins. It is possible to pinpoint community preferences based on the
responses.
● Open Houses - Two open houses were held in February 2020, engaging over 300 visitors. One open house
was held at the Lincoln Center, and one at Preston Middle School. City staff and the consultant team were
able to interact with interested members of the community and quantifiable data was collected using
informational boards. All materials were translated into Spanish and interpretation services were available
at both events. Scheduling of the open houses included a Thursday evening and a Saturday morning to
provide more opportunities for engagement.
● Pop-up Events - Three pop-up events were held at various locations throughout the community, including
Foothills Mall, downtown Fort Collins, and the Old Town Library. This unique engagement strategy enabled
the team to interact with residents directly in an unannounced and spontaneous format, enabling input from
residents who may not normally participate in a traditional community engagement format.
● Stakeholder Meetings - In November 2019 and February 2020 a series of special meetings were held to
hear directly from key partners (e.g., PSD, CSU) and representatives of various user groups (e.g., bicyclists,
disc golf enthusiasts, pickleball players etc.). These key stakeholders provided valuable feedback on
potential improvements and partnerships.
● Our City Web Page - An engagement webpage at <https://ourcity.fcgov.com/parksandrec> provided a
valuable resource for project updates and ongoing collection of ideas and feedback throughout the plan
development process.
Phase 2: Draft Plan Sections Feedback - CONSULT
Summer 2020 - Fall 2020
Goal: Provide a recap of Master Plan activities to date; highlight how Phase 1 public input has informed the Plan
thus far; introduce appropriate Plan documents; and direct participants to Our City site to give feedback.
Target Groups:
● General public; Advanced Review Committee (Board Members); Our City subscribers; Stakeholders; Open
house participants; Recreation subscribers (includes Reduced Fee participants); Larimer County Health
Department - Built Environment Leadership Team; Poudre School District; Mivoz/The Family Center; Boys
& Girls Club
Strategies:
● Social media outreach; Targeted emails; Postcard and/or flyers; Our City website; CityNews; Flyers in parks
and recreation facilities
Phase 3: Draft Plan Release and Input - INFORM
Fall 2020
Goal: Provide community members, Parks & Recreation stakeholders and City staff the opportunity to review
the complete draft Master Plan and offer any final comments or feedback.
Target Groups:
● General public; Advanced Review Committee (Board Members); Our City subscribers; Stakeholders; Open
house participants; Recreation subscribers (includes Reduced Fee participants).
Strategies:
● Our City webpage; Social media channels; Promotion video; Recreation and FCTV video monitors; Email
newsletter
Agenda Item 17
Item # 17 Page 4
ATTACHMENTS
1. Council Memo (PDF)
2. Natural Resources Advisory Board Memo (PDF)
3. Powerpoint Presentation (PDF)
-1-
ORDINANCE NO. 010, 2021
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ADOPTING THE UPDATE TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
AS AN ELEMENT OF THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Policy Plan was last updated in 2009; and
WHEREAS, since 2019 City staff has worked with a consultant team, stakeholders, and
the community, including representatives from many City boards and commissions, to assess the
City’s system of parks and recreation facilities and generate an update to what is now called the
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein
by reference; and
WHEREAS, the updated Plan examines park and recreation needs in the context of the
City’s extensive system of public spaces and describes strategies, guidelines, and decision-making
tools that the City can use as a road map to shape its vision of the park and recreation system over
the next 20 years; and
WHEREAS, the Plan includes a detailed Capital Improvement Plan and potential funding
solutions to support future system development, maintenance, replacement and programming of
parks and recreation facilities
WHEREAS, the Plan is one element of City Plan, the City’s comprehensive Plan, which
was itself last updated in April 2019, pursuant to the City Council’s adoption of Resolution 2019-
048, later ratified by Ordinance No. 040, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed Plan is in the best interests
of the residents of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS as follows:
Section 1. That the City Council hereby makes and adopts the determinations and
findings contained in the recitals set forth above.
Section 2. That the City Council hereby adopts the Parks and Recreation Master Plan
attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
-2-
Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 5th day of
January, A.D. 2021, and to be presented for final passage on the 19th day of January, A.D. 2021.
__________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk
Passed and adopted on final reading on the 19th day of January, A.D. 2021.
__________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 1
PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLANRECREATE: PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLANJANUARY 2021
EXHIBIT A
2 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
City Council
Wade Troxell, Mayor
Susan Gutowsky, District 1
Julie Pignataro, District 2
Ken Summers, District 3
Kristin Stephens, District 4
Ross Cunniff, District 5
Emily Gorgol, District 6
City Manager’s Office
Darin Atteberry, City Manager
Kelly DiMartino, Deputy City Manager
Parks and Recreation
Master Plan Core Team
John Stokes, Interim Director,
Community Services
Mike Calhoon, Director, Parks
Aaron Harris, Interim Director, Recreation
Kurt Friesen, Director, Park Planning and
Development
Valerie Van Ryn, Lead Marketing
Specialist, Recreation
Janice Saeger, Financial Analyst,
Recreation
Dawna Gorkowski, Financial Analyst,
Parks
Honore Depew, Senior Project Manager,
City Manager’s Office
Bob Adams, Former Director, Recreation
Technical Advisors
Group
Suzanne Bassinger, Park Planning and
Development
Josh Birks, Economic Health
Michael Brunkhardt, Parks Office
Jason Chadock, Recreation
Carolyn Conant, Environmental Services
Heather Cox, Communications & Public
Involvement
Robert Crabb IV, Parks
Chad Crager, Engineering
Elliot Dale, Purchasing
Matthew Day, Park Planning and
Development
Zach Delissio, Recreation
Leonardo Escalante, Communications
and Public Involvement
Julia Feder, Nature in the City
Michelle Finchum, Environmental
Services
Cameron Gloss, Community
Development and Neighborhood
Services
Tessa Greegor, FC Moves
Dan Evans, Utilities
LeaAnn Haisch, Parks
Heidi Hansen, Utilities
Brian Hergott, Operation Services
Aaron Iverson, FC Moves
Kimberly Lopez, Natural Areas
Ellen Martin, Cultural Services
Jim McDonald, Cultural Services
Katy McLaren, Environmental Services
Mary Miller, Cultural Services
Ryan Mounce, Community Development
and Neighborhood Services
Angela Pena, Parks
Marc Rademacher, Recreation
Kenneth Sampley, Utilities
Jolee Sawyer, Utilities
Zoe Shark, Natural Areas
Kenneth Smith, Parks
Beth Sowder, Social Sustainability
Rachel Steeves, Natural Areas
Katie Stieber, Recreation
Jennifer Torrey, Park Planning and
Development
Michael Trombley, Special Operations
Heidi Wagner, Natural Areas
Martina Wilkinson, Traffic Operations
Kevin Williams, Parks
Jill Wuertz, Parks
Advance Review
Committee
Andrea Elson, Land Conservation and
Stewardship Board
Jerry Gavaldon, Transportation Board
Michael Hardisty, Golf Board
Louise Holland, Youth Advisory Board
Sam Houghteling, Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board
Kevin Kruse, Natural Resources Advisory
Board
Jessica MacMillan, Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board
Bob Mann, Natural Resources Advisory
Board
Suhass Narayanan, Youth Advisory Board
Sherri Reichow, Commission on
Disabilities
Jan Rossi, Senior Advisory Board
Sammie Williams, Natural Resources
Advisory Board
Stakeholder Groups
Bicycle Colorado
Bike Fort Collins
CSU
Cycles for Youth
Downtown Business Association
Downtown Development Authority
Fort Collins Areas Swim Team
Fort Collins Baseball Club
Fort Collins Pickleball Club
Fort Collins Running Club
Fort Collins Ultimate Frisbee
Fort Collins Womens Hockey
Larimer County Dept of the Built
Environment
Lewis Tennis School
Liberty Common Charter School
Northern Colorado Disc Golf
Overland Mountain Bike Association
Poudre School District
Rocky Mountain Adventures
Tennis Association
Triple Crown Sports
Twin Silo BMX
University Bike Advisory Committee
Visit Fort Collins
Your Group Ride
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 3
Prepared for the City of Fort Collins
by OLIN
with PROS Consulting, Mundus Bishop,
the Trust for Public Land, and ETC Institute January 2021
4 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 5
Parks and recreation are part of what attracts residents to Fort Collins and entices them to stay.
In 2008 the City adopted a Parks and Recreation Policy Plan, which provided a strategy for
expanding parks and recreation to align with the community’s vision for the future. As a city that
is proud to build what we plan, since 2008 we have added a half dozen new neighborhood parks,
Twin Silo Community Park, Poudre River Whitewater Park, the Foothills Activity Center, and miles
of new trails—and more is underway.
As Fort Collins continues to meet its future, this new Parks and Recreation Master Plan, ReCreate,
is a roadmap to making the best use of the resources we have. We acknowledge that parks and
recreation provide immense value to the community and offer benefits that touch every one of
the City’s outcome areas. It means acknowledging that parks and recreation are part of a holistic
system of public spaces that spans the natural and the designed, the big and the small, the urban
and the not-so-urban, but together bring beauty to Fort Collins and give it an intentional sense of
place. We acknowledge that partnerships within and outside of city government are necessary to
provide the high-quality spaces and programs that residents have come to expect.
As we work to rethink, renew, and reimagine parks and recreation in Fort Collins, we are
committed to ensuring that equity is a primary consideration. The process of developing the
plan included engagement with a representative cross-section of residents, and equity is a
theme interwoven throughout the master plan to ensure all community members benefit
from the richness of parks and recreation. This shows up in the plan’s level of service metrics
ensuring access to recreational amenities across the city; it shows up in recommendations to
expand equitable program pricing strategies; and it shows up in proposing we proactively and
consistently bring neighbors into the process of shaping future projects so that public space
reflects the needs and values of the community.
I could not be more optimistic for the future of parks and recreation in Fort Collins and look
forward to seeing the vision of this plan realized.
Wade Troxell
Mayor
6 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 7
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
CONTEXT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
The Value of Parks and Recreation .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
The 2008 Policy Plan ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Planning Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Trends .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
PARKS AND RECREATION TODAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Programs .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Financial Snapshot ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
SUMMARY OF ENGAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .89
GUIDELINES FOR PARKS AND FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .97
Capital and Program Life Cycles .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .99
Design Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Park and Recreation Facility Classifications .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .115
Level of Service .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .161
GUIDELINES FOR PROGRAMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
Program and Service Classifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
Program Costs and Pricing ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .205
POLICY FRAMEWORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .211
IMPLEMENTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .277
Action Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279
Funding ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .305
Partnerships ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .317
PHYSICAL VISION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .327
APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .333
Appendix A: Transit Accessible Parks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .334
Appendix B: Benchmarking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .336
Appendix C: Survey Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .338
Appendix D: Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .344
INTRODUCTION
10 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Introduction / 11
INTRODUCTION
Every great city has great parks. Some great cities are
also lucky enough to lie within great landscapes.
With exceptional natural resources, charm, and high
quality of life, growth in Fort Collins shows no sign
of slowing down. Parks and recreation must keep
up. The City has been diligent about purchasing and
preserving land for future parks, but limited land and
high demand mean that parks must compete with other
priorities, including housing and transportation. And, as
recreational preferences continue to change, there will
always be another trend to consider while providing all
of the opportunities residents have come to expect.
The Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
examines park and recreation needs in the context
of the city’s impressive system of public spaces and
articulates an ambitious yet attainable vision for parks
and recreation in the future. To implement this vision,
the plan weaves together strategies, guidelines, and
decision-making tools that the City can use as a road
map to shape the park and recreation system over the
next 20 years.
Glowing paths add a sense wonder to the night.
Twin Silo Community Park
12 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
A HOLISTIC SYSTEM OF
PUBLIC SPACES
A bike ride along the Poudre River Trail for some fresh air or for a
commute to work. A walk into the foothills to decompress or to
learn. A ballgame for the championship or between neighbors. A dip
in the pool to cool off or to maintain agility. A slide through a grain
silo or a sugar beet. Flowers and holiday lights in Old Town. Tree-
lined streets that turn into festival grounds. Public spaces are part of
what make Fort Collins Fort Collins.
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan focuses specifically on parks
and recreation and reflects the holistic, interconnected view of the
city’s public spaces articulated by City Plan (Policies CR 3.1 and 3.2).
While each part of the holistic system serves a different purpose,
has its own vision, and is managed differently, residents should
experience these spaces as complementary and seamless.
“Our parks, I think, are a jewel, an asset, that
we can, through this integration and systems
perspective, get so much more out of for
our community.”
—Mayor Wade Troxell
A focus on parks and recreation, within a framework of the city’s public
space network.
Components of Fort Collins’ Public Spaces Network
Sliding through the city’s agricultural history.
Sugar Beet Park Playground
FORT
COLLINS’
PUBLIC
SPACES
PARKS
STREETSCAPESNATURALCULTURALSCHOOLSOFT SURFACEPAVED, MULTI-REC R E A T I O N
AREASFACILITIESFACILITIESTRAILSUSE TRAILSFA C IL IT I E S
P ark s a n d R e c r e a t ion Master Plan
Introduction / 13
PARKS AND RECREATION
VISION
Parks, trails, and recreation facilities in Fort
Collins are an invitation to all community
members to sustain and build wellness,
curiosity, innovation, and community—as part
of the city’s iconic, interconnected network
of public space .
CONTEXT
16 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Context / 17
THE VALUE OF
PARKS AND
RECREATION
People flock to Fort Collins, and stay, due to the city’s
high quality of life—to which parks and recreation
facilities are major contributors. Try to imagine Fort
Collins without parks or recreation. Together, parks and
recreation have a profound impact on residents’ health,
happiness, and well-being.
On the surface, parks and recreation provide
opportunities for people to relax, exercise, and socialize
in a natural setting. However, their impacts ripple out
into almost all aspects of urban life. They provide
essential benefits not just to residents, but also to the
city’s environmental and economic well-being.
Dog owners are frequent users of parks
and trails.
Crescent Park
18 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
48%
Increase in physical activity
with better park access and
outreach
BENEFITS BY OUTCOME
AREA
Fort Collins recognizes the tremendous benefits it receives from its
public spaces and will continue to find ways to increase and leverage
those benefits.
In fact, parks and recreation in Fort Collins provide benefits in
every one of the City’s seven outcome areas, which represent
overarching community priorities: neighborhood livability, social
health, environmental health, economic health, a high performing
government, safer communities, cultural health, and active
transportation. These outcome areas are used for budgeting and for
tracking progress.
An investment in parks and recreation is an investment in all of the
community’s priorities.
Neighborhood Livability and Social Health
Benefits
Parks and recreation facilities are a vital part of life in urban settings,
and they positively affect both the mind and body of the residents
who use them.
There is no question that physical activity provides a multitude of
health benefits. As the U.S. Surgeon General states, “Americans can
substantially improve their health and quality of life by including
moderate amounts of physical activity in their daily lives.”1 The
difficulty arises when people do not have the time or place to
exercise. There is strong evidence to suggest, however, that people
are much more likely to exercise when they have easy access to
convenient recreation access, c
ultural r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
touris
m
,
a
s
s
e
t
s
f
or
r
ecr
ui
t
menttrails and active transpo rta tio n
increased property valu e s, re sp o n s iv e p ro g ra m m in g physical and mental health, hospitable clim
ate
community cohesioncl
ean ai
r & water, habitatNeighborhood
Livability & Social
HealthCulture &
RecreationEconomic
HealthEnvironmental
Health
Safe
Community
Transportation
High Performing
Government
FORT COLLINSPARKS &RECREATION
Parks and recreation contribute to all of Fort
Collins’ community priorities.
Connections between parks and recreation and Fort
Collins’ seven outcome areas.
Context / 19
Shaded surfaces may be between 20 and 45 degrees cooler
than their unshaded surroundings
60°80°
park space. One study in the American Journal of Preventative
Medicine found that enhanced access to parks along with public
outreach led to a 48 percent increase in the frequency of physical
activity.2 Unfortunately, the opposite is also true. When people do
not have easy access to parks, they are far less likely to exercise at
all.2 Increasing access to parks can positively benefit communities by
reducing rates of preventable diseases such as diabetes and obesity.
The health benefits of parks and recreation go beyond physical to
include mental health benefits. Places with green features, such as
parks and recreation facilities, help reduce mental fatigue.3 Trees, in
particular, can lessen depression and anxiety and improve memory.4,5
One of the most telling accounts of this is in children diagnosed with
Attention Deficit Disorder, or ADD. ADD impairs a person’s ability
to focus on tasks for an extended length of time, and treatments
cost the U.S. around $30 billion annually.6 Parks may play a key role
in helping those struggling with this condition. One study found
that children with ADD were able to concentrate much better after
playing in a park with greenery. 7 The study also found that the more
greenery the park had, the more the child was relieved of the ADD
symptoms.7
Environmental Health Benefits
Parks and recreation facilities also present significant benefits to
the environment by helping to improve water and air quality. Trees
play the most significant role in this because they continuously
remove pollutants from the air. It is estimated that within the lower
48 states, urban trees remove 783,000 tons of pollution every year.8
This environmental service is estimated to be worth $5.6 billion to
the U.S.8 Trees also help to reduce the heat island effect in urban
areas by actively lowering the temperature around and beneath their
canopies. This temperature difference is not insignificant. Shaded
surfaces may be between 20 and 45 degrees cooler than unshaded
surfaces.9 Also, green spaces aid in reducing stormwater runoff.
Green infrastructure, such as rain gardens and bio-swales, collect
and hold large amounts of rainwater from streets and roofs.10 These
environmental health benefits lead to sizable economic benefits. A
study by the U.S. Forest Service found the trees in Fort Collins save
the city $400,000 annually by reducing runoff.11
20 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Economic Health Benefits
Parks and recreation facilities are economic drivers within cities.
Property values near parks are significantly higher than those
without parks nearby. A report studying the effects of the Greenbelt
in Boulder, Colorado, found that a home’s value next to the Greenbelt
was over 30 percent higher than those only a half-mile away. 12
Conversely, a property’s value decreased by about $4 for every foot
away from the park it was.12 Parks also increase economic health by
contributing to local tourism, which in turn leads to more money
being spent at business and shops. The state of Colorado estimates
that outdoor recreation generates over $13 billion in consumer
spending every year. 13 This spending leads to almost $1 billion in
state and local tax revenue.13
High Performing Government Benefits
Governments in cities with more parks also see their share of the
benefits. Analysts estimate that in 2015, public park and recreation
agencies in the U.S. generated an astounding $154 billion in
economic activity and supported 1.1 million jobs.14 Parks also help
governments save money in ways that are less obvious but still
extremely important. A report by the American Forest estimates
that trees in cities help to reduce the costs of stormwater retention
facilities by $400 billion.15
Events within parks and at recreation facilities
stimulate the local economy.
Story time at The Farm at Lee Martinez Community Park
Context / 21
Safe Community Benefits
Although harder to quantify, the role parks and recreation facilities
play in social health and community engagement should not be
understated. At a minimum, they help to make places more livable
and more beautiful, which makes residents take more pride in their
neighborhoods. Parks and recreation facilities provide places for
people to gather and to socialize. They serve as places to hold
events that strengthen community bonds and cultural ties. Small
events such as birthday parties and reunions bring friends together,
while large civic events can draw entire neighborhoods. Both are
important and make neighborhoods more lively, active spaces.
Culture and Recreation Benefits
Parks are also cultural assets. Communities of all kinds use parks
and recreation facilities as places for engagement, meetings, or
events. They also reflect the history and culture of a city. Fort Collins’
Twin Silo and Sugar Beet Parks, for example, pay homage to the
agricultural and working class roots of the city.
Perhaps the most obvious benefits of parks and recreation facilities
are as places that enable and promote recreation. From passive
activities to more active athletic activities, from opportunities to
engage as individuals to those for groups, from indoor to outdoor
activities, from the competitive to the casual, parks and recreation
facilities are the most common places for people to unwind, relax,
and spend their leisure time.
Spending leisure time playing pickleball.
Twin Silo Park
22 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Transportation Benefits
Trails are a critical part of the parks and recreation system. However,
they serve both recreation and transportation purposes. Therefore,
trails need to be considered a critical piece of transportation
infrastructure. A study in 2008 by the Rails to Trails Conservancy
found that “50 percent of trips taken in the United States can be
accomplished by riding a bicycle for 20 minutes and 25 percent
of short trips can be completed by walking 20 minutes or less”.17
According to the National Household Travel Survey, less than 1
percent of daily trips are completed with a bike, and only 11 percent
are completed by walking.18 In other words, people are driving to
places that could be easily walked or biked to. One reason for
this may be the lack of active transportation infrastructure such as
greenways and trails. This infrastructure allows people to integrate
biking or walking into their routines and leads to more active
lifestyles, a healthier population, fewer greenhouse gas emissions,
and less traffic.
Active transportation infrastructure, including bike trails, has
been shown to create more direct and indirect jobs than road
infrastructure. A study by the Political Economy Research Institute
at the University of Massachusetts investigated the impacts of
new bicycle infrastructure in 11 U.S. cities They found that bicycle
infrastructure generated about 11 jobs per $1 million spent, compared
with eight jobs for road infrastructure.19
50%
of all trips in the U .S . could
be completed by riding a
bicycle for just 20 minutes
Multi-use trails in Fort Collins are well-used by
recreational users and commuters.
Fossil Creek Trail
Context / 23
24 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Context / 25
THE 2008
POLICY PLAN
This Parks and Recreation Master Plan replaces the
2008 Parks and Recreation Policy Plan, which guided
decision-making and management related to parks and
recreation for over a decade. Since its adoption, the City
has taken great strides towards meeting the plan’s goals,
and the system has grown to include new parks, trails,
and facilities.
Art adds another dimension to parks and trails in
Fort Collins.
Fossil Creek Trail
26 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
2008 POLICY PLAN
SUMMARY
The 2008 Parks and Recreation Policy Plan replaced the 1996
Parks and Recreation Policy Plan. It was the result of a process that
included City staff, residents, and City Council. The plan set out a
vision, guiding principles, goals, objectives, and strategies.
Goals
• Maintain Appropriate Level of Service as the Community Grows
• Implement Buildout of the Park System, Trail System and
Recreation Facilities
• Address Issues Raised During the Public Process
• Address Issues Raised by City Staff
• Seek Increased Funding
• Increase Partnerships and Collaborations
• Evaluate Pricing and Cost Recovery
• Evaluate Marketing and Communications
Buildout
Much as today, Fort Collins in 2008 was experiencing rapid growth.
Unlike today, the city had more room to grow. A heavy focus of the
2008 plan was on developing a plan for buildout of new parks in
rapidly growing greenfield areas.
PROGRESS SINCE 2008
New Parks
Since 2008, the Park Planning and Development Department has
added several new parks to the public space system. These include:
• Poudre River White Water Park, 2019
• Sugar Beet Park, 2019
• Twin Silo Community Park, 2017
• Crescent Park, 2017
• Radiant Park, 2013
• Waters Way Park, 2012
• Registry Park, 2012
New Recreation Centers
The Recreation Department has also completed the Foothills Activity
Center, bringing recreation opportunities to Midtown Fort Collins,
and continued to improve and update its program offerings and
amenities. Many facilities have been given major renovations.
Trails
Several new trails have also been added to the public space system
including the Power Trail, the Fossil Creek Trail, the Mason Trail, Front
Range Trail, Lincoln Middle School spur, multiple new segments of
the Poudre Trail, and the Long View Trail.
Parks Progress Since the 2008 Policy Plan
0 1 2
Miles
Proposed Parks: Complete
Proposed Parks: in Progress
Proposed Parks: Not Started College AveCollege AveTaft Hill Rdaft Hill RdTimberline RdTimberline RdMulberry StMulberry St
Harmony RdHarmony Rd
28 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Context / 29
PLANNING
CONTEXT
The CIty of Fort Collins is committed to thoughtful,
inclusive planning for its future, and it strives to follow
through on the aspirations of its adopted plans. From
City Plan to system plans to area plans to specific
studies, Fort Collins has a constellation of existing plans
with visions and policy that guide City actions toward a
more sustainable and prosperous future. It is essential to
understand the planning context within which the Parks
and Recreation Master Plan fits and which should, in
turn, be informed by this plan in the future.
Fort Collins is home to one of only a handful of
in-channel whitewater courses in the country.
Poudre River Whitewater Park
30 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
CITY PLAN AND STRATEGIC
PLAN
Strategic Plan (2020)
The Fort Collins Strategic Plan focuses on short- and mid-term
guidance, setting a five-year road map for community priorities,
articulating ways to measure success, and aligning work across
projects and departments.
City Plan (2019)
City Plan is the comprehensive plan for Fort Collins. It articulates
the community’s long-term vision and core values, and establishes
the overall policy foundation that is be used by the City, its partners,
and the community at large to work toward that vision. The Parks
and Recreation Master Plan is one of several functional plans that
more explicitly provide direction on how to implement City Plan’s
priorities.
IMPLEMENTATION
AND MONITORING
Identifies strategies to support the implementation of principles and policies in
each outcome area.
Implementation
Strategies
Plan Amendments
and Monitoring
APPENDICES
A: Trends and Forces Report
B: Housing Trends and Demand
Forecast Assessment
C: Employment Land Demand Analysis
D: Employment Land Suitability
Analysis
E: Transportation Master Plan
Resources
F: Transit Master Plan
8 FORT COLLINS CITY PLAN01 | INTRODUCTION 9
Provides overall policy foundation for the community and City organization.
Principles and policies are organized by the seven key outcome areas
corresponding to the City’s organizational structure and the BFO process.
What is City Plan?
City Plan is the comprehensive and transportation master plan for Fort Collins. It articulates our community’s
vision and core values; guides how the community will grow and travel in the future; and provides high-level
policy direction used by the City organization, local and regional partners, and the community at large to
achieve our vision and priorities.
City Plan takes the long view, identifying goals and actions the community should take over the next ten
to twenty years. The implementation of City Plan is facilitated by partnerships and the City’s Strategic
Plan, which provides short- and mid-term guidance. Both are supported by the City’s budgeting process,
department-level functional plans and the availability of funding from many sources.
Technologies and innovations, some of which are not fully available today, may be needed to fully implement
this Plan. Implementation strategies will also rely on continually assessing community priorities and allowing
for ongoing community dialogue.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
& DIRECTIONWHY
FORT COLLINSCITY PLAN
PLANNING OUR FUTURE. TOGETHER.Long-TermNear- and Mid-TermWHATBUDGETING FOR OUTCOMES (BFO)
CLIMATE ACTION
PLAN
FOCO CREATES
NATURAL AREAS
MASTER PLAN
Functional PlansHOW/FUNDINGOther City Plan Elements
City Plan incorporates existing plan elements and related plans by reference. As new plan elements and
other related planning documents are prepared and adopted, they will become a part of City Plan. In general,
all references to “the city” or “community” apply to both the incorporated city limits and the GMA.
PRINCIPLES AND
POLICIES
Neighborhood
Livability &
Social Health
Culture &
Recreation
Environmental
Health
Safe
Community Transportation High Performing
Community
TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
Guides improvements in pedestrian, bicycle, transit and roadway infrastructure
for the city and the Growth Management Area (GMA).
STRUCTURE PLAN
This land use plan guides growth and development within the Fort Collins GMA,
including the mix of uses, infill and redevelopment, and the types of infrastructure
and transportation investments needed.
Livability Community Sustainability
COMMUNITY
VISION AND CORE
VALUES
Establishes overarching direction for City Plan and highlights “big ideas” that
underpin other parts of the plan.
Plan Organization
City Plan consists of six primary sections:
Economic
Health
Structure Plan map
...AND OTHERS
AS ADOPTED
TRANSIT MASTER
PLAN
NATURE IN THE
CITY
AFFORDABLE
HOUSING
STRATEGIC PLAN
PARKS AND
RECREATION
POLICY PLAN
WATER AND
WASTEWATER
MASTER PLAN
STORMWATER
MASTER PLAN
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC
PLANS
As the comprehensive plan, City Plan sets the
core values and vision for Fort Collins.
City Plan - Budgeting and Organization
Context / 31
FUNCTIONAL PLANS
Transit Master Plan (2019)
The Transportation Master Plan outlines strategies to achieve full
community access and create a safe and reliable multi-modal
transpiration network.
Natural Areas Master Plan (2014)
The Natural Areas Master Plan is very closely aligned with this Parks
and Recreation Master Plan, and both support each other in order to
succeed. The Natural Areas Master Plan presents an overview of the
Natural Areas program and establishes the priorities for conservation
and stewardship of the city’s natural areas system.
Nature In The City (2015)
Nature in the City is a strategic plan focused on ensuring that access
to nature is a defining feature of Fort Collins as the City grows and
becomes more densely populated. The plan provides resources and
approaches to achieve this goal.
Pedestrian Plan (2011)
The Pedestrian Plan outlines pedestrian issues within the city and
proposes possible solutions to these problems. The plan’s goal is to
help the community overcome pedestrian hazards and create a safe
and adequate pedestrian network within the city.
Paved Recreational Trail Master Plan (2013)
The Paved Recreational Trails Master Plan provides a vision and
strategy for a city wide connected paved trail network. New
trail development is led by the Park Planning and Development
Department.
Stormwater Master Plan (2003)
The Stormwater Master Plan Update highlights stormwater projects
throughout the city and addresses new sustainable practices that
can return impacted streams to healthy ecosystems.
Municipal Sustainability and Adaptation Plan
(2019)
The Municipal Sustainability and Adaptation Plan is an update of the
2013 Sustainability Plan and outlines how the City will implement
sustainable practices across multiple departments. The plan presents
goals, objectives, and strategies for the future.
Natural Areas Vision: Through the
work of the Natural Areas Department,
a diverse system of conserved and
restored lands will connect community
members to nature. These conserved
lands will protect nature and contribute
to the health and wellbeing of our
community.
Nature In The City Vision: A connected
open space network accessible to the
entire community that provides a variety
of experiences and functional habitat for
people, plants and wildlife.
32 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
OTHER COMPLETED PLANS
AND STUDIES
FoCo Creates Arts and Culture Master Plan
(2020)
The FoCo Creates Arts and Culture Master Plan is a 10-year plan that
seeks to make arts and the creative culture in Fort Collins inclusive,
equitable, and engaging for all residents in a way that promotes well-
being and lifelong learning; Fort Collins as a destination for visitors;
and a comprehensive and collaborative network.
Larimer County Comprehensive Plan (2019)
The Larimer County Comprehensive Plan establishes a framework
for decision making into the future. It takes many other plans and
community feedback into account in order to create a plan that has
the best interest of the county in mind.
Poudre River Downtown Master Plan (2014)
The Poudre River Downtown Master Plan focuses on a three mile
stretch of the Cache La Poudre River between N Shields Street and
Mulberry Street. The plan provides strategies to increase habitat,
recreation, and flood mitigation throughout this segment of the river,
across parks and natural areas.Poudre River Downtown Master Plan
2‐2 | P a g e
Figure 2.1 Master Plan for Reach 1
Envisioning an integrated public space system
along the Poudre River across administrative
boundaries.
Poudre River Downtown Master Plan: Reach 1
Context / 33
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
29
The proposed Southeast Community Center
would enhance Fossil Creek Community Park.
Fossil Creek Site Plan
Fort Collins Sports Facility Market and
Feasibility Analysis (2019)
The Fort Collins Sports Facility Market and Feasibility Analysis
identifies that there is market potential for a new sports complex in
Fort Collins. Based on its market analysis, it offers two options for
facilities that would have the most potential for economic impact: an
8-court indoor sports facility or a 16-diamond outdoor sports facility.
Fort Collins Southeast Community Recreation
& Arts Center Summary of Needs and
Development Plan (2013)
The Summary of Needs and Development Plan is a feasibility study
for a new Southeast Community Recreation and Arts Center. The
study finds that a program consisting of a 78,900 gross sq. ft. of
spaces in Fossil Creek Park would meet the needs and expectations
of residents, while providing the greatest value for the future.
34 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Sub Area Plans
Adopted sub area plans get to a finer grain of land use and policy
detail for specific geographic areas of the city. The West Central
Area Plan, Midtown Plan, South College Corridor Plan, East Mulberry
Corridor Plan, Downtown Plan, Mountain Vista Subarea Plan, and
Northwest Subarea Plan identify opportunities for new parks and
public spaces. As further development and redevelopment occur,
these spaces should be reconsidered in the context of this plan.
ONGOING EFFORTS
Canal Importation Stormwater Master Plan
Fort Collins Utilities is currently working to update the Selected Plan
of Improvements section of the Stormwater Master Plan to identify
alternatives directed at addressing flooding issues in the Canal
Importation Basin. In addition to developing solutions to reduce
flood risk, the Selected Plan will include opportunities for water
quality improvements, stream rehabilitation, habitat enhancement,
open space preservation, and recreation.
Potential Park Sites Identified in Sub Area Plans
0 1 2
Miles
West Central Area Plan (Open Space)East Mulberry Corridor Plan (Neighborhood/Mini Park)
Midtown Plan (Civic Amenity)Downtown Plan (Civic Center Park)
South College Corridor Plan (Open Lands)College AveCollege AveTaft Hill Rdaft Hill RdTimberline RdTimberline RdMulberry StMulberry St
Harmony RdHarmony Rd
36 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Context / 37
TRENDS
National, regional, and local trends affect Fort Collins’
public spaces. National participation trends show
the growth or decline in recreational activities, which
provides insight into recreational amenities that may
be more or less important to residents. Yet, the trend
with the greatest impact on the future of parks and
recreation can be found in projected population
forecasts that show continued population growth in
Fort Collins through at least 2040. This affects the
number of facilities needed over the coming years and
increases the pressure to preserve natural resources and
provide casual use spaces. These trends informed this
plan’s recommendations and will continue to guide the
implementation of this plan.
Playgrounds are needed across the city, as
neighborhoods transition between age groups over time.
Sugar Beet Park
38 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Population Growth
Fort Collins has grown significantly over the last century and will
continue to experience accelerated growth well into the current
century (Figure 1). Between 2020 and 2040, the city is expected
to grow by nearly 40%, from 174,871 residents to almost 240,000.20
The fastest growth is expected to occur in east and northeast Fort
Collins, as well as along South College Avenue (Figure 2).
Education
Almost 63% of the residents living in Fort Collins have a college or
advanced degree.21 This is almost 13% higher than the average for
Larimer County at 46.3%.21
DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
Fastest Growth (100-300%)
Fast Growth (20-100%)
Moderate Growth (1.5-20%)
No Growth (-1.5-1.5%)Population2020 2030 2040200020101990198019701960195019401930192019101900
200,000
100,000
150,000
50,000
250,000
0
Figure 1. Growth took off in the 1950s and has not slowed down.
Recorded and projected population, 1900–2040.
Source: North Front Range Metropolitan Planning
Organization - Population Projections 2015–2030.
Source: United States Historic City Populations 1790-2010 (Stanford University & University of Nebraska Omaha). U.S. Census 2018 Annual Estimates of
Resident Population.
Figure 2. Fastest growth projected in east and
northeast Fort Collins, as well as along S. College
Ave.
Projected growth rate, 2015–2030.
Context / 39
85 and over
15,00015,000 10,00010,000 5,0005,000 0
80-84
75-79
70-74
65-69
60-64
55-59
50-54
45-49
35-39
40-44
25-29
20-24
15-19
10-14
5-9
under 5
Male Female
30-34
Age
Fort Collins is much younger than Larimer County, with a median age
of 29 years that is 7 years younger than that of the county, 36 years
(Figure 3).22
Income
The median annual household income in Fort Collins is over $60,110,
nearly 12 percent lower than the $67,664 median annual household
income for all of Larimer County (Figure 5).23 The city also has a
poverty level of 17% which is higher than the surrounding county
(13%).23
Race and Ethnicity
Fort Collins and Larimer County have a similar racial and ethnic
makeup. A very large proportion of Fort Collins residents are white
(81%)24 (Figure 4).More than half of the remaining fifth of Fort Collins
is Hispanic or Latino (12%).24
Figure 3. Fort Collins is young, with a median
age 7 years younger than Larimer County.
Age by Sex, 2013–2017.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community
Survey 2013–2017 5-Year Estimates, Table B01001, 2017.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community
Survey 2013–2017 5-Year Estimates, Table B01001H, 2017.
Figure 4. The large majority of Fort Collins
identifies as white.
Race and ethnicity, 2013–2017.
White: 81%
Asian: 3%
Other Race: 2%
Black: 1%
Native American: 0 .5%
Hispanic/Latino: 12%
Hispanic/
Latino
12%
White
81%
County
Median: 36
Median: 29
40 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Higher than city
average
Figure 5. Spatial patterns of race, ethnicity, income, and health should inform future engagement.
Shares of residents compared to the city average (race, ethnicity, income) and ranked index of priorities (health)
Hispanic/Latino Residents Black Residents
Less than city
average
At city average
Higher than city
average
Less than city
average
At city average
Asian Residents
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2013–2017 5-Year Estimates, Table B01001H, 2017.
Source: City PlanSource: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey
2013–2017 5-Year Estimates, Table B19001, 2017.
Highest
Priority81 – 100
61 – 80
41 – 60
Lowest
Priority0 – 20
21 – 40
Spatial Patterns
Comparing demographics at the Census block group level to
citywide averages shows a number of spatial patterns that should be
taken into consideration when addressing park and recreation needs
and when conducting future engagement.
Compared to the city average, the east and northeast parts of Fort
Collins have higher percentages of Hispanic and Latino residents,
the southeast part of Fort Collins has a higher percentage of Asian
residents, and the east and south parts of Fort Collins have higher
percentages of Black residents.
The neighborhoods surrounding downtown and Colorado State
University have higher shares of residents below the poverty line
than the city as a whole.
The northeast part of Fort Collins, particularly around the Poudre
River, is a potentially vulnerable area according to the Larimer
County Department of Health and Environment’s Health Equity
Index. The index is a tool that weights socioeconomic factors and
health indicators.
22 FORT COLLINS CITY PLAN02 | VISION AND VALUES 23
Who you are and where you live in Fort Collins
can put you on a different path than a resident
from a different background or part of the
city. This can result in different outcomes for
your health, ability to access healthy food,
recreational opportunities and many other
areas that are critical to maintaining the high
quality of life City Plan envisions for all members
of our community. In this update, City Plan
utilized a health and equity lens to develop new
policies and implementation actions that can
help ensure that our actions and decisions do
not disproportionately burden one group over
another. As our city becomes more diverse, it will
be important to understand the barriers facing
certain groups or neighborhoods (whether they
be related to race, income, health, employment,
educational attainment, age, ability, etc.) so
that all residents have access to the services,
resources, infrastructure and opportunities they
need.
HEALTH AND EQUITY
What are Social Determinants of
Health?
Social determinants of health are the social and
physical conditions of a person’s life that influence
their personal health and well-being: education,
income level, access to health care, social and
community context, and neighborhood/built
environment. Research shows that residents who
live in poverty and have lower levels of educational
attainment are more likely to have poor health
outcomes and will be more vulnerable to impacts
from climate change. Understanding this linkage is
an important factor in planning for health equity.
HEALTH EQUITY INDEXFORT COLLINS, 2016 2016
How does it all connect?
The Health Equity Index analysis shows that social
factors related to health outcomes are not equal
in all parts of Fort Collins. Median household
income tends to be lower for non-white racial and
ethnic groups ($42,333 or less) than it is for white
households ($62,804). Educational attainment also
varies by race and ethnicity—for example, 42% of
Hispanic/Latinx residents had a bachelor’s degree
in 2016, compared with 59% of white residents.
Generally, the Health Equity Index shows that
more vulnerable or disadvantaged populations
(census block groups with high index values) are
clustered north of the Poudre River, while less
vulnerable populations (census block groups with
low index values) are clustered near Downtown.
These disparities in health equity have wide-ranging
implications for all outcome areas in City Plan.
What is the Health Equity Index?
The Health Equity Index, developed by the Larimer
County Department of Health and Environment
(LCDHE), is a tool to identify potentially vulnerable
areas of the community. It is a weighted index
made up of two calculated scores to determine
the geographic areas of highest need. The first
component includes an Equity Score, composed
of socioeconomic factors using the most recent
American Community Survey (ACS) estimates from
the U.S. Census Bureau. The second component, the
Health Score, is composed of health indicators from
500 Cities Data (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention). See the City Plan Trends and Forces
Report in the Appendix for more information.
Equity Indicators
»Population under age 18
»Population age 65 and older
»Households at or below the
Federal Poverty Level
»Hispanic/Latinx population
»Non-white (minority) population
»Households without a vehicle
»Disability status
Health Indicators
»Adult obesity
»Adults with no leisure-time physical
activity
»Adults who experienced poor mental
health for 14 or more days
Scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the highest priority.
The Health Equity Index is a composite measure of overall health equity in Fort Collins and
includes the following equity and health indicators:Residents below the Poverty Line Larimer Co. Health Equity Index
Runners take their marks at the
Healthy Kids Run
Healthy Kids Run
Context / 41
42 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
RECREATION TRENDS
National trends shed a spotlight on which activities are growing,
which are steady, and which are declining in participation. The data
in this section was obtained from the Sports & Fitness Industry
Association’s Sports, Fitness & Recreational Activities Topline
Participation Report 2020.
National Trends in General Sports
Basketball (24.9 million) and golf (24.3 million) have the highest
participation of all general sports, followed by tennis (17.7 million),
baseball (15.8 million), and outdoor soccer (11.9 million).
5-Year Decrease/Increase in Participation
Current Participation
SquashFootball (Touch)-23%-21%BadmintonFootball (Tackle)-15%-14%Ice Hockey-2.6%Golf (9 or 18 Hole)Participation IncreasingParticipation Decreasing
-1.7%Wrestling+2.8%Golf (Entertainment Venue)+85%Track and Field+0.8%9.9M3.4M6.7M15.8M5.3M1.4M1.3M3.7M24.9M2.1M6.4M1.9M4.7M4.1M17.7M24.2M2.4M3.5M4.4M11.9M1.6M2.2M6.1M1.2M5.1M5.1M2.2MBoxing+11%Football (Flag)+23%Pickleball+41%Baseball+20%Gymnastics+1.7%Rugby+9.1%Volleyball+2.9%Racquetball-3.9%Basketball+8.0%Lacrosse+5.2%Soccer (Outdoor)-5.4%Volleyball (Sand)-5.4%Roller Hockey-6.9%7.5%SoftballCheerleading+8.6%Ultimate Frisbee-49%Tennis-1.2%Soccer (Indoor)+18%Figure 6. Entertainment venue golf is the fastest growing general sport, breathing new life into golf.
National Trends in General Sports
Source: Sports & Fitness Industry Association. Sports, Fitness & Recreational Activities Topline Participation Report 2020.
Context / 43
The popularity of basketball, golf, and tennis can be attributed to
the fact that they can be played with relatively few participants.
Basketball’s success can also be attributed to its low barrier to
entry. Limited equipment is needed to play basketball, and space
requirements are minimal. This makes basketball the only traditional
sport that can be played at the majority of American homes as a
driveway pickup game. Even though golf has experienced a decrease
in participation in the last five years, it still continues to benefit from
its wide age segment appeal and is considered a life-long sport.
The emergence of golf entertainment venues has presented a new
alternative that has breathed life back into the game of golf, and
participation has increased drastically (+85%) in the past five years—
the fastest growing sport. Following that, pickleball (+41%), and flag
football (+23%) have seen the fastest growth. Traditional sports
baseball (+20%) and indoor soccer (+18%) have also experienced
significant growth. Sports declining in participation the most rapidly
include ultimate frisbee (-49%), squash (-23%), touch football (-22%),
badminton (-15%), and tackle football (-14.6%).
Basketball has one of the lowest barriers to
entry, with little equipment required and minimal
space needs.
Crescent Park
44 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
National Trends in General Fitness
Overall, fitness activities have experienced strong growth in recent
years. Many of these activities have become popular due to an
increased interest among Americans to improve their health and
enhance quality of life by engaging in an active lifestyle. These
activities also have very few barriers to entry, which provides a
variety of options that are relatively inexpensive to participate in and
can be performed by most individuals. The most popular general
fitness activities nationally include fitness walking (111 million),
treadmill (57 million), free weights (51 million), running and jogging
(50 million), and stationary cycling (37 million).
The activities growing most rapidly over the past five years are trail
running (+46%), yoga (+21%), cross-training style workouts (+20%),
and stationary group cycling (+18%). Over the same time frame, the
only activities that have declined are traditional triathlons (-9.2%),
running and jogging (-8.7%), free weights (-8.3%), and fitness
walking (-1.0%).11.0M+46%Trail Running15.4M+16%Stair Climbing24.0M+12%Dance9.2M+8.7%Pilates33.0M+3.9%Elliptical111.4M-1.0%Fitness Walking13.5M+20%Cross Training6.0M+13%Martial Arts28.4M+11%Free Weights1.5M+4.3%Triathlon Off Road36M+0.9%Weight Resistant Machines51.5M-8.3%Free Weights30.5M+21%Yoga3.7M+15%Barre22.0M+12%Aerobics23.5M+5.0%Bodyweight Exercise5.2M+1.7%Boxing37.1M+3.9%Stationary Biking Upright9.9M+18%Stationary Cycling56.8M+13%Treadmill3.8M+10%Tai Chi7.0M+4.1%Cardio6.8M+0.8%Boot Camp Training49.5M-8.7%Running/Jogging2.0M-9.2%Triathlon Road5-Year Decrease/Increase in Participation
Current Participation
Figure 7. Though it has experienced some decline, participation in fitness walking dwarfs participation in other activities.
National Trends in General Fitness
Source: Sports & Fitness Industry Association. Sports, Fitness & Recreational Activities Topline Participation Report 2020.
Context / 453.6M49.7M7.0M13.2M8.6M10.6M15.4M39.2M6.6M39.3M28.1M2.4M12.8M2.1M7.4M4.8M+55%+37%+20%+12%+7.2%+5.5%+5.4%+3.6%-0.8%-1.7%-2.3%-2.7%-9.5%-12%-21%Roller BladingClimbingFishing FreshwaterFishing SaltwaterAdventure RacingBicycling RoadBackpacking OvernightHikingArcheryCampingCamping RVFishing FlyBirdwatchingSkateboardingBicycling MountainBMXNational Trends in Outdoor/Adventure
Recreation
Trends show a contrast between growth and decline in participation
in outdoor/adventure activities. Much like the general fitness
activities, these activities encourage an active lifestyle, can be
performed individually or within a group, and are not as limited by
time constraints. Outdoor/adventure activities with the greatest
participation are day hiking (50 million), road bicycling (39 million),
freshwater fishing (39 million), camping within a quarter mile of a
vehicle or home (28 million), and recreational vehicle camping (15
million).
The greatest increases in participation over the last five years were
seen in BMX bicycling (+55%), day hiking (+37%), fly fishing (+20%),
salt water fishing (+12%), and mountain bicycling (+7.2%). Activities
such as in-line roller skating (-21%), archery (-12%), and adventure
racing (-9.5%) saw the greatest decreases in participation.
5-Year Decrease/Increase in Participation
Current Participation
Figure 8. Hiking has a large user base and has been growing.
National Trends in Outdoor/Adventure Recreation
Source: Sports & Fitness Industry Association. Sports, Fitness & Recreational Activities Topline Participation Report 2020.+0.4%
46 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
National Trends in Aquatics
Swimming is considered a lifetime activity, which is most likely why
it continues to have such strong participation. Swimming has the
highest participation by far (28 million) among aquatic activities,
largely due to its broad, multigenerational appeal.
Participation in all aquatic activities has grown over the past
five years. Aquatic exercise stands out for its large increase in
participation (+23%), most likely due to ongoing research that
demonstrates the activity’s great therapeutic benefit.28.2M11.2M2.9M+12%+23%+4.1%Swimming FitnessAquatic ExerciseSwimming CompetitiveFigure 9. All aquatic sports have grown in
participation in the past five years.
National Trends in Aquatics
Swimming is considered a lifetime activity.
EPIC swim lessons
Source: Sports & Fitness Industry Association. Sports,
Fitness & Recreational Activities Topline Participation
Report 2020.
Context / 473.6M11.4M2.6M3.0M2.7M3.4M3.4M1.4M9.0M2.7M7.7M5.1M2.7M3.2M+30%+29%+9.9%+8.9%-7.8%-8.9%-9.1%-10%-10%-14%-14%-120%-14%-20%Stand-Up PaddlingKayaking RecreationWhitewater KayakingSurfingSailingKayakingRaftingBoardsailingCanoeingScuba DivingSnorkelingJet SkiingWakeboardingWater SKiingNational Trends in Water Sports
Recreational kayaking (11 million), canoeing (8.9 million), and
snorkeling (7.7 million) are the most popular water sports based on
total participation. Participation levels in water activities tend to vary
by region, season, and environmental factors. A region with more
water access and a warmer climate is more likely to have a higher
participation in water activities than a region with a long winter or
limited water access. Therefore, fluctuations in participation may be
the result of environmental factors.
Over the last five years, stand-up paddling (+30%) and recreational
kayaking (+29%) were the fastest growing water activities, followed
by white water kayaking (9.9%) and surfing (8.9%). Over the same
period, water skiing (-20%), jet skiing (-20%), scuba diving (-14%),
wake boarding (-13%), and snorkeling (-13%) all saw declines.
5-Year Decrease/Increase in Participation
Current Participation
Figure 10. Kayaking and paddle boarding lead growth in water sports.
National Trends in Water Sports
Source: Sports & Fitness Industry Association. Sports, Fitness & Recreational Activities Topline Participation Report 2020.
48 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
National Average: 100
Local Sport and Market Potential
The Market Potential Index (MPI) measures the relative likelihood
that an adult resident of Fort Collins will participate in an activity
compared to the U.S. National average, indicating probable demand
for that activity. Comparisons are made in categories: general sports,
fitness, and outdoor activity.
Fort Collins demonstrates above average market potential index
(MPI) numbers in all three categories. These MPI scores show that
Fort Collins has very strong participation rates when it comes to
recreational activities. This important for the City to consider when
building new facilities or starting up new programs.GENERAL SPORTSFITNESSOUTDOOR ACTIVITIESBaseball 127
Pilates 144
Soccer 140
Archery 127
Frisbee/Disc Golf 157
Weight Lifting 134
Volleyball 151
Road Biking 141
Hiking 119
Basketball 143
Swimming 124
Softball 114
Backpacking 165
Canoeing/Kayaking 125
Golf 131
Yoga 127
Aerobics 127
Birdwatching 110
Horseback Riding 126
Football 159
Walking for Exercise 107
Tennis 164
Mountain Biking 156
Freshwater Fishing 135
Ping Pong 153
Zumba 128
Jogging/Running 146
Boating (Power)115
Target Shooting 102
Figure 11. Fort Collins has high market potential
across all categories.
Market Potential Index for Participation
Source: ESRI
Context / 49
Residents were asked about emerging trends
in parks and recreation during open houses at
Preston Middle School (top) and The Lincoln
Center (bottom).
Open House Trends Results
Future Trends
During public open houses, participants identified other emerging
trends and innovative ideas that the City will continue to monitor in
an effort to ensure that facilities and programs continue to respond
to changing user needs. (See p. 226)
PARKS AND RECREATION TODAY
52 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
PUBLIC SPACE NETWORK
While this plan focuses specifically on parks and recreation,
parks and recreation do not exist in isolation. They are part of a
comprehensive public space network that contributes to the identity
of Fort Collins. This public space network includes:
• Parks
• Recreation Facilities
• Natural Areas
• Hard and Soft Surface Trails
• School Facilities
• Cultural Facilities
• Streetscapes
• Stormwater
Together, the city's 48 parks and 58 natural areas total approximately
15,000 acres of public space, stitched together by 125 miles of hard
and soft surface trails.
Parks and recreation facilities are primarily for the enjoyment
of people. Parks vary greatly in size and character and provide
residents an opportunity to recreate and relax outdoors. Recreation
facilities include buildings, such as community centers, and other
built facilities, like pools, that provide opportunities for people to
relax, compete, learn, and socialize both indoors and out.
Natural areas make up most of the land area of the public space
network. While residents are welcome to explore parts of natural
areas on soft surface trails, natural areas are primarily for the
preservation of land and habitat. They protect the city's waterways
and serve as development buffers between Fort Collins and
surrounding communities. Some natural areas are located outside
the city, including Soapstone Prairie on the Wyoming border.
The trail system in Fort Collins connects these spaces together. Many
trails follow natural features, such as the Spring Creek Trail, which
winds its way along Spring Creek through the city. Other trails offer
more natural experiences out away from urban centers.
The Poudre School District and the Thompson School District also
make up a piece of the overall public space network. Although they
are currently not always open to the public, school facilities include
playgrounds, fields, tracks, and gyms that present an opportunity for
greater recreational access through partnership with the City.
Cultural facilities are part of the public space network both because
many, such as the Museum of Discovery and Gardens on Spring
Creek, are located within or adjacent to parks and because, like the
Gardens on Spring Creek, they are thematically related to natural
systems.
Tree-lined streets, enhanced medians, and colorful flowers make
streetscapes part of the beauty and function of public spaces.Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
City Limits
Growth Management Area
Parks
Recreation Facilities
Soft Surface Trails
Paved, Multi-Use Trails
County-Owned Open Spaces
National Forest Land
City-Owned Natural Areas
State Park Land
School Properties
Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
54 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
1873 – 1962 1963 – 1973 1974 – 1987
EVOLUTION OF THE PUBLIC
SPACE NETWORK
The legacy of public spaces in Fort Collins goes back to the city's
founding in 1873, with Library Park and Washington Park. As the
city steadily grew, so did acquisition of parks, recreation facilities,
trails, and natural areas. The earliest parks were built along the city's
natural systems. Spring Creek and the Poudre River became the
focus of a network of public spaces. In 1974, the city's Open Space
Plan was completed, marking the beginning of the trail system.
In 1992, the public space network saw a dramatic change after a
citizen-initiated sales tax to fund natural areas passed. Up until this
time, outdoor recreational space was managed solely by the Parks
Department. When the Natural Area Program was established,
a large portion of park land became natural areas. While parks
continued to steadily grow, after 1992 natural areas saw a rapid
increase in land acquisition due to its dedicated funding.
1,655 acres
414 acres312 acres
1873
City of Fort Collins
established
1963
First Parks and
Recreation Plan
1974
Open Space Plan,
Trail System Planned
1937
Recreation
Commission formed
Figure 12. Acquisition of natural areas grew dramatically after a dedicated sales tax was approved by voters in 1992.
Timeline of City-owned public space growth 1873–2020
Parks and Recreation Today / 55
1988 – 1995 1996 – 2007 2008 – 2020
Natural Areas
Parks
36,640 acres
30,886 acres
3,574 acres
931 acres876 acres1,918 acres 561 acres
Recreation Facilities
1996
Parks and
Recreation Plan
1992
Natural Areas
Program Established
2013
Paved Recreation
Trail Master Plan
2020
Parks and Recreation
Master Plan
2008
Parks and
Recreation Plan
2014
Natural Areas
Master Plan
1988
Parks and
Recreation Plan
56 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
PARKS
Parks are designed primarily to support outdoor active and passive
recreation opportunities in Fort Collins. Some, like Spring Canyon
Community Park, are over 100 acres and can accommodate a
multitude of activities. Others, like Alta Vista Park, are barely an
acre but provide spaces for nearby residents to spend time outside.
There are several classifications of parks, which include community
parks, schoolside parks, neighborhood parks, urban parks, plazas,
mini parks, and special use parks. More on park classifications can be
found in the Classifications section.
Management Responsibilities
Parks Department
maintenance and scheduling
Recreation Department
programing
Park Planning and Development Department
purchasing land and water, design, and construction of new parks
At a Glance
Count
54 parks
Total Size
931 acres
City Limits
Growth Management Area
Parks
Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
58 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
RECREATION FACILITIES
Recreation facilities in Fort Collins provide spaces for residents'
indoor and specialized recreation needs. They include spaces for
fitness and exercise, gymnasiums, pools, courts, ice rinks, and more.
Recreation facilities include community centers, neighborhood
centers, indoor/outdoor sport complexes, court/field clusters, and
special use facilities. More on recreation facility classifications can be
found in the Classifications section.
Management Responsibilities
Recreation Department
management, scheduling, and programming
Operation Services Department
construction and maintenance of buildings and facilities
At a Glance
Count
10 recreation facilities
Annual Recreation Participant
1.3 million
Key Recreation Facilities
Northside Aztlan Community Center
Northside Aztlan is the largest recreation center in the city. Located
in Old Fort Collins Heritage Park, it offers a number of indoor
amenities and programs and is easily accessible from downtown.
Fort Collins Senior Center
The Fort Collins Senior Center is a National Institute of Senior
Centers (NISC) accredited center located in Rolland Moore
Community Park. The Senior Center offers a wide range of programs,
including travel, outdoor adventure, special events, fitness, and art, to
all adults 18 years of age and older.
Foothills Activity Center
The Foothills Activity Center is located inside the Foothills Mall and
features a gymnasium, workout rooms, and smaller classrooms.
Edora Pool Ice Center (EPIC)
EPIC is the city’s ice facility, as well as an aquatics center, home
to related skating and aquatics programs. EPIC receives over one
million visits per year and is home to the CSU hockey and water polo
teams as well as the Fort Collins Area Swim Team (FAST) and Fort
Collins Figure Skating Club.
City Limits
Growth Management Area
Recreation Facilities
Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
SENIOR CENTER
NORTHSIDE
AZTLAN
EPIC
FOOTHILLS ACTIVITY
CENTER
60 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
TRAILS
There are two systems of trails in the Fort Collins public space
network: paved, multi-use trails and soft surface trails.
Paved, multi-use trails serve as major recreation and transportation
routes across Fort Collins. They are used for walking, running,
cycling, inline skating, skateboarding, and other uses by people of
all ages and skill levels. Grade separated crossings help make the
system a more user friendly and connected experience across the
city.
Soft surface trails allow for a more rugged hiking experience inside
and outside the city. They are often located around natural features
and provide a low impact way for residents to access natural areas.
Supplementing trails, Fort Collins' on-street bicycle infrastructure,
particularly the low-stress bicycle network, connects people from
their homes to the public space network. Fort Collins is rated a
Platinum Bike Community by the League of American Bicyclists.
Management Responsibilities
Parks Department
maintenance of paved, multi-use trails, maintenance of soft surface
trails within parks
Natural Areas Department
design, construction, and maintenance of soft surface trails within
natural areas
Park Planning and Development Department
acquisition, design, and construction of major paved, multi-use trails
At a Glance
Length
44 miles of paved, multi-use trails
181 miles of soft surface trails
Soft Surface Trails
Paved, Multi-Use Trails
City Limits
Growth Management Area
Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
62 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
NATURAL AREAS
Natural areas in Fort Collins exist primarily to preserve land, natural
features, and habitat for wildlife. Low-impact, passive recreation is
allowed in most natural areas, with opportunities to enjoy nature
on soft surface trails. Some of the largest contiguous natural
areas are located around the edges of the city, where they serve
as development buffers between Fort Collins and surrounding
communities. County-owned open spaces and reservoirs, particularly
to the south and west of Fort Collins supplement the city's natural
areas.
Management Responsibilities
Natural Areas Department
acquisition, development, maintenance, and programming of City-
owned natural areas
Larimer County Natural Resources Department
acquisition, development, maintenance, and programming of
County-owned open spaces and reservoirs
Colorado Parks & Wildlife
acquisition, development, maintenance, and programming of State
Parks
United States Forest Service
acquisition, development, maintenance, and programming of
Federally-owned open spaces and reservoirs
Park Planning and Development
development of paved trails in natural areas
At a Glance
Count
52 City-owned natural areas
32 County-owned open spaces
Total Size
36,640 acres City-owned natural areas (includes natural areas
outside GMA)
National Forest Land
State Park Land
County-Owned Natural Areas
City-Owned Natural Areas
City Limits
Growth Management Area
Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
64 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
SCHOOL FACILITIES
School facilities have numerous recreational amenities, including
playgrounds, fields, tracks, and gyms, that some residents use
on a daily basis. Though these facilities are not always open and
available for the public to use, they could be through partnerships
with the Poudre and Thompson School Districts and Colorado State
University. Such partnerships would greatly increase the City’s ability
to close gaps in access to recreational amenities.
Management Responsibilities
Poudre and Thompson School Districts
acquisition, development, maintenance, and programming on
district-owned properties
Colorado State University
acquisition, development, maintenance, and programming on
university-owned properties
Parks Department
grounds maintenance in some specific locations (e.g., Beattie Park)
At a Glance
Count
54 school properties
Total Size
2,911 acres
School District Boundary
School Properties
City Limits
Growth Management Area
Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
THOMPSON SCHOOL DISTRICT
POUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT
CSU
66 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
Cultural Facilities
CULTURAL FACILITIES
Cultural facilities are part of the public space network both because
many, such as the Museum of Discovery, are located within or
adjacent to parks and because, like the Gardens on Spring Creek,
they are thematically related to natural systems.
Management Responsibilities
Cultural Services Department
acquisition, development, and programming
Recreation Department
limited programming
Parks Department
grounds maintenance
Operation Services Department
construction and maintenance of buildings and facilities
At a Glance
Count
4 cultural facilities
Key Cultural Facilities
Carnegie Center for Creativity
Located in Library Park, the historic Carnegie building is home to an
art gallery, classroom, and meeting spaces that are available to rent
for exhibitions, performances, and cultural programs.
Fort Collins Museum of Discovery
The Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, in Lee Martinez Community
Park, is an interactive and immersive museum, dedicated to creating
meaningful opportunities to learn, reflect, and have fun with science,
history, and culture.
The Gardens on Spring Creek
The Gardens on Spring Creek is a botanic oasis situated in the heart
of Fort Collins. Offering twelve acres of curated gardens and the first
ever Butterfly House in northern Colorado, the Gardens on Spring
Creek is an extraordinary place for all ages to connect with nature.
The Lincoln Center
The Lincoln Center is Northern Colorado’s premier venue for special
events and the performing and visual arts, offering Broadway shows,
concerts, comedy, dance, and nationally recognized exhibitions.
City Limits
Growth Management Area
Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
GARDENS ON SPRING
CREEK
CARNEGIE CENTER
FOR CREATIVITY
FORT COLLINS MUSEUM
OF DISCOVERY
LINCOLN CENTER
68 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
STREETSCAPES
Tree-lined streets, enhanced medians, and colorful flowers make
streetscapes part of the beauty and function of public spaces.
Management Responsibilities
Engineering Department
design and construction of streets and streetscapes
Parks Department
maintenance of enhanced streetscapes and street trees
At a Glance
Count
11 green streets
57,340 public trees
City Limits
Growth Management Area
Green Streets
Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
70 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
STORMWATER
Fort Collins stormwater system carries stormwater through ditches
to detention basins throughout the city. They are often located near
parks and consist of more natural plantings and habitat.
Management Responsibilities
Stormwater Department
design and construction of all basins, maintains irrigation ditches,
stormwater master planning
At a Glance
Count
893 detention basins
220 miles of irrigation ditches
City Limits
Growth Management Area
Stormwater Ditches
Detention Ponds
Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
72 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC
SPACES MANAGEMENT
RESPONSIBILITIES
Detailed on the preceding pages, responsibility for management of
public spaces in Fort Collins is split across many City departments.
Many of these departments are located within the Community
Services service area, however, many buildings and facilities within
the public spaces network are built and maintained centrally by the
Operation Services Department.
Acquisition
Development
Maintenance
Programming
Scheduling
PARKS RECREATION PARK PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
NATURAL AREAS CULTURAL SERVICES OPERATION SERVICES SCHOOL DISTRICTS ENGINEERING STORMWATER
Parks
Recreation Facilities
Natural Areas
Trails
Schools
Cultural Facilities
Streetscapes
Stormwater
Figure 13. The Parks Department maintains much of the city's public spaces.
Department Responsibilities
Maintenance crews keep parks looking and
functioning optimally.
Parks and Recreation Today / 73
PARKSRECREATIONPARK PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
NATURAL AREAS CULTURAL SERVICES OPERATION SERVICES SCHOOL DISTRICTS ENGINEERING STORMWATER
Parks
Recreation Facilities
Natural Areas
Trails
Schools
Cultural Facilities
Streetscapes
Stormwater
74 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Parks and Recreation Today / 75
PROGRAMS
The Fort Collins Recreation Department provides
and facilitates hundreds of programs and services to
residents each year. Planning, implementing, conducting,
and evaluating a diverse array of recreation programs
and special community-wide events, and the operation
of multiple facilities happens year round. Residents have
hundreds of City-provided offerings in athletics, classes,
summer camps, aquatics, teen activities, and therapeutic
recreation available to them. Partnerships with other
organizations expand offerings even further.
Residents of all ages can interact with farm animals and
go on hayrides and pony rides at the Farm.
The Farm at Lee Martinez Community Park
76 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
CORE PROGRAM AREAS
Fort Collins strives to provide access to outstanding programs,
services, and community amenities. To accomplish this involves
identifying core program areas that can provide focus on activities
and outcomes of greatest importance to the community as informed
by current and future needs. Public recreation is often challenged by
trying to be all things to all people. Identifying core program areas
assists staff, policy makers, and the public to focus on what is most
important.
Core program areas are those that:
• have been offered for a long period of time (over 4 years)
• consume a relatively large portion (5% or more) of the overall
budget
• are offered 3-4 seasons per year
• have wide demographic appeal
• have a tiered level of skill development available
• have dedicated full-time staff
• have specialized facilities
• represent a significant share (20% or more) of the local market
The City offers programs and services in ten core program areas.
Residents can join teams in a variety of
competitive sports.
Softball Team
Parks and Recreation Today / 77
Advanced, Competitive, and Private Level
Activities
Classes, clinics, workshops, and other structured recreation activities
in which pre-registration is required and the primary intent is to
perfect a specific skill set.
Examples: clinics, skill-based camps, advanced youth and adult
classes, freeze basketball, higher levels of freestyle skating,
synchronized skating, adult sports tournaments, national or
international travel trips, private or semi-private swim or skate
lessons, and personal training.
Intermediate Level Activities
Classes, clinics, workshops, and other structured recreation activities
in which pre-registration is required and the primary intent is to
enhance a specific skill set.
Examples: basic 3 through basic 8 ice skating, level 3 through level
5 swim classes, youth and adult sport leagues, cheerleading, regular
tennis lessons, intermediate adult and youth classes, general fitness
and dance classes, general education classes, day camps (EPIC
Adventure, Farm camps), trips or travel outside of Fort Collins,
historic cafe (lunch and learn), and freestyle skating levels.
Beginner / Introductory Level Activities
Classes, clinics, workshops, and other structured recreation activities
in which pre-registration is required and the primary intent is to
acquire basic fundamental skills.
Examples: tot skate through basic 2 classes, guppy through level
2, early learning classes, beginner or introductory adult and youth
classes, Sporties for Shorties, SNAG golf, and Northern Colorado
trips or travel.
Community Events
Large-scale events that are planned for the entire community on an
annual basis. Events may be designed for any or all ages, abilities,
skills, or interests and are highly intensive.
Examples: 4th of July parade, Kites in the Park, and art shows.
Drop-In Monitored Access (Non-Instructional)
Activities which do not require registration, are non-instructed, and
include staff or volunteer supervision or oversight.
Examples: public swim, lounge or facility drop-in, open gym, open
swim, public skate, and open basketball.
78 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Facility and Equipment Rentals
Rental of space or equipment by individuals, businesses, or groups.
Examples of facility rentals: meeting/community rooms, presentation
rooms, gymnasiums, pools, and ice rinks, picnic pavilions.
Examples of equipment rentals: tables, chairs, audio and visual
presentation equipment, podiums, table services, ice skates, boats
and water craft, lockers, door-to-door services.
Food and Beverage
The availability of consumable goods for purchase at snack bars,
vending, and alcohol services.
Inclusion
Reasonable accommodation to any Recreation Department activity
or facility providing leisure opportunities to people with physical
or cognitive disabilities or who are economically diverse. Inclusion
services are intended to comply with the Americans with Disabilities
Act.
Merchandise for Resale
The availability of non-consumable goods for purchase at various
facilities.
Examples: pro-shop items such as swim googles and swim diapers.
Special Events
Annual events planned for a portion of the community serving a
special interest. Events may be designed for any or all ages, abilities,
skills, or interests.
Examples: Father's Day 5k, Amazing Race, Hogwarts Halloween,
Tribute Series, and Holiday Market.
ENSURING THE RIGHT CORE
PROGRAM MIX
The core program areas provided by Fort Collins appear to meet
some of the major needs of the community, but the program mix
must be evaluated on a recurring basis to ensure that offerings
within each core program area—and the core program areas
themselves—align with changing leisure and recreation trends,
demographics, and residents' needs. The National Recreation and
Park Association (NRPA) recommends that six determinants be used
to inform what programs and services are provided.
Hogwarts Halloween is a special event that
draws residents of all ages.
Hogwarts Halloween at Northside Aztlan Community
Center
Parks and Recreation Today / 79
Conceptual Foundations of Play, Recreation,
and Leisure
Programs and services should encourage and promote a degree of
freedom, choice, and voluntary engagement in their structure and
design. Programs should reflect positive themes aimed at improving
quality of life for both individuals and the overall community.
Organizational Philosophy, Mission, and
Vision
Programs and services should support a Department’s mission
and vision, values, goals, and objectives. These generally center on
promoting personal health, community well-being, social equality,
environmental awareness, and economic vitality.
Constituent Interests and Desired Needs
Departments should actively seek to understand the recreational
needs and interests of their constituency. This not only ensures an
effective (and ethical) use of taxpayer dollars, but also helps to make
sure that programs perform well and are valued by residents.
Creation of a Constituent-Centered Culture
Programs and services reflect a culture where constituents’ needs
are the prime factor in creating and providing programs. This
should be reflected not only in program design, but in terms of
staff behaviors, architecture, furniture, technology, dress, forms of
address, decision-making style, planning processes, and forms of
communication.
Experiences Desirable for Clientele
Programs and services should be designed to provide the
experiences desirable to meet the needs of the participants/clients
in a community and identified target markets. This involves not only
identifying and understanding the diversity of needs in a community,
but also applying recreation programming expertise and skills to
design, implement, and evaluate a variety of desirable experiences
for residents to meet those needs.
Community Opportunities
When planning programs and services, a department should
consider the network of opportunities afforded by other
organizations such as nonprofits, schools, other public agencies, and
the private sector. Departments should also recognize where gaps
in service provision occur and consider how unmet needs can be
addressed.
80 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
AGE SEGMENTS SERVED
The City balances programs for each age segment in line with best
practices by targeting each age segment as a primary market in
three or more core program areas. An age segment analysis should
be conducted every year to note changes or to refine age categories.
Given the growth in residents ages 55 and over and commensurate
demand for services that serve this segment of the population, it is
appropriate to further segment this group into those 55–64, those
65–74, and those 75 and older. People in these age brackets will
have increasingly different needs and expectations for programs and
services in the coming years, and program planning will be needed
to provide differing requirements.
Ideally, each program should be analyzed by the age segments
it serves. Program coordinators or managers should include this
information when creating or updating program plans for individual
programs. An age segment analysis can also be incorporated into
mini business plans for comprehensive program planning.
CORE PROGRAM AREA PRESCHOOL (5 AND UNDER)ELEMENTARY (6–12)TEENS (13–17)YOUNG ADULT (18–34)ADULT (35–54)ACTIVE ADULT (55–64)SENIOR (65+)
Advanced, Competitive, and Private Level Activities
Beginner/Introductory Level Activities
Community Events
Drop-In Monitored Access Non-Instructional)
Facility and Equipment Rentals
Food and Beverage
Inclusion
Intermediate Level Activities
Merchandise for Resale
Special Events
Parks and Recreation Today / 81
CORE PROGRAM AREAPRESCHOOL (5 AND UNDER)ELEMENTARY (6–12)TEENS (13–17)YOUNG ADULT (18–34)ADULT (35–54)ACTIVE ADULT (55–64)SENIOR (65+)
Advanced, Competitive, and Private Level Activities
Beginner/Introductory Level Activities
Community Events
Drop-In Monitored Access Non-Instructional)
Facility and Equipment Rentals
Food and Beverage
Inclusion
Intermediate Level Activities
Merchandise for Resale
Special Events
Primary Market
Secondary Market Each age segment is a primary market for at least three core program areas.
Market by Age Segement and Core Program Area
82 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Parks and Recreation Today / 83
FINANCIAL
SNAPSHOT
In many cities, parks and recreation departments are
considered “spend” departments, given the task-driven
services that they provide. However, there are several
financial variables that impact these departments'
efficiency and effectiveness. The following financial
snapshot is based on the FY 2020 adopted budget
for the Parks, Recreation, and Park Planning and
Development departments in Fort Collins.
The Long View Trail connects Fort Collins to
Loveland.
Long View Trail
84 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
PARKS DEPARTMENT
The Parks Department's annual allocated funding for park
maintenance is $12 .3 million, 96% of which comes from the City's
general fund and from the Keep Fort Collins Great sales tax.
Many cities have combined park and recreation departments. Among
cities with similar population densities to Fort Collins, 44% of the
median annual operating budget is dedicated to the management
and maintenance of developed parks. In Fort Collins, the Parks
Department maintenance budget is 56% of the combined Park and
Recreation Department budgets. However, considering best practice
unit costs for maintenance of park facilities in the region, the Parks
Department is currently underfunded by approximately $958,000.
The Parks Department is underfunded by about $958,000 compared to best practices.
Parks Cost of Service Analysis
PARK TYPE INVENTORY UNIT INVENTORY TOTAL FUNDING CURRENT UNIT COST BEST PRACTICE UNIT COST
ADDITIONAL FUNDING NEEDED TO MEET BEST PRACTICE
Mini Parks Acre 14 $220,629 $15,759 $16,000 $3,371
Neighborhood
Parks
Acre 384 $3,193,549 $8,317 $9,000 $262,451
Community Parks Acre 573 $4,390,457 $7,662 $8,000 $193,543
Paved Trails Linear Mile 44 $402,348 $9,144 $12,000 $125,652
Rights of Way/
Medians
Sq. ft.3,525,655 $1,015,919 $0.29 $0.30 $41,777
Special Use Areas
(Downtown)
Acre 14 $2,231,035 $159,360 $159,360 $-
Undeveloped Parks Acre 69 $18,386 $266 $300 $2,314
City Facility
grounds
Acre 133 $275,786 $2,074 $2,074 $-
Ranger Program 3 of Rangers 3 $270,440 $90,147 $200,00 $329,560
Events /working
with other
departments
# of Events 12 $286,432 $23,869 $23,896 $-
Total $12,305,982 $958,688
Parks and Recreation Today / 85
Park maintenance keeps parks beautiful
and safe.
Twin Silo Community Park
PARK PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
The goal of the Park Planning and Development Department is to
collaborate with the community to plan, design, and build the city's
system. Only 3% of parks and recreation agencies nationally have a
dedicated park planning and development department, reflecting
the importance of parks in Fort Collins.
The Department is fiscally sustainable for the next 20 years as
its $4.7 million operating budget is primarily funded through
neighborhood and community park capital improvement expansion
fees.
86 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
The Recreation Department’s annual budget for recreation programs
and services is about $11 .3 million, more than half of which (55%)
is offset by revenue generated by the Department, also known as
cost recovery. Among cities with similar population densities to Fort
Collins, the median cost recovery rate is 27%. This translates into a
larger per capita cost recovery for Fort Collins of $40 compared to
the median of $26 in cities of similar densities.
Many cities have combined park and recreation departments.
Among cities with similar population densities to Fort Collins, 56%
of the median annual operating budget is dedicated to recreation
programs, services, and facilities. In Fort Collins, the Recreation
Department budget is 44% of the combined Park and Recreation
Department budgets.
Parks and Recreation Today / 87
The Recreation Department's rate of cost recovery, at 55%, is double that of similarly dense cities.
Recreation Cost of Service Analysis
PROGRAMS PARTICIPATION/VISITATION TOTAL REVENUE DIRECT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES
INDIRECT/ ADMIN/ OVERHEAD EXPENDITURES
TOTAL REVENUES OVER/ UNDER TOTAL
TAX SUPPORT PER PARTICIPANT/VISITOR
CURRENT COST RECOVERY
Aquatics
All
Programs
308,634 $989,514 $713,235 $1,253,711 ($977,432)($3.17)50.3%
Ice
All
Programs
146,390 $1,210,314 $519,607 $1,533,464 ($842,757)($5.76)59.0%
Youth Enrichment Programs
All
Programs
108,134 $1,000,659 $645,697 $1,267,832 ($912,870)($8.44)52.3%
Adult Enrichment Programs
All
Programs
39,581 $527,165 $489,866 $667,916 ($630,617)($15.93)45.5%
Arts, Crafts, Pottery - Youth and Adult
All
Programs
20,533 $212,896 $143,182 $269,739 ($200,025)($9.74)51.6%
Adaptive Recreational Opportunities
All
Programs
15,299 $53,738 $67,125 $68,086 ($81,473)($5.33)39.7%
Fitness Programs
All
Programs
360,774 $481,620 $298,042 $610,211 ($426,633)($1.18)53.0%
Sports
All
Programs
168,708 $825,784 $499,183 $1,046,266 ($719,665)($4.27)53.4%
Special Events
All
Programs
NA $19,750 $7,300 $25,023 ($12,573)NA 61.1%
Room Rentals
All Rentals NA $259,347 $116,864 $328,592 ($186,109)NA 58.2%
Other
General
Daily Drop-
In
NA $566,649 $717,942 ($151,293)NA 78.9%
Totals
All
Programs
1,168,053 $6,147,436 $3,500,101 $7,788,781 ($5,141,446)NA 54.5%
SUMMARY OF ENGAGEMENT
90 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Summary of Engagement / 91
ENGAGEMENT
The process of developing this Parks and Recreation
Master Plan included a number of opportunities for
residents, advocates, and elected leaders to weigh in
and provide input. The goal of these touch points was to
gain a thorough understanding of park and recreation
wants and needs. This knowledge was critical to creating
a plan that will effectively serve the community for the
next decade or more.
Residents were asked to allocate funds for
different improvements at engagement events.
Visit Fort Collins Pop-Up
92 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
Open Houses
In February of 2020, two open houses were held, at the Lincoln
Center and at Preston Middle School. At the open houses, a series
of boards were set up for participants to explore at their own pace.
Informational boards provided maps and statistics about the parks
and recreation system and the planning process. Input boards
provided participants opportunity to weigh in by voting for their
preferred choices or by writing in their own ideas. City staff and
consultants were available to provide clarifications, answer questions,
and discuss issues. Over 150 participants attended the two open
houses.
Pop-Up Engagement
Around the same time as the open houses, the planning team
popped up at the Foothills Mall, Visit Fort Collins, and the Old Town
Library, These events were smaller versions of the open houses
and consisted of six different boards that shared information and
collected feedback from the public. The goal of these smaller events
was to catch people in the course of their normal activities who may
not have known about or who may have been unable to attend the
open houses. Sixty-five people participated in the pop-up events.
OurCity
Throughout the planning process, Fort Collins’ web-based
engagement platform, OurCity, provided a location to learn about
the process, to provide input, and to review draft documents.
How important are quality
parks, paved trails, recreation
facilities, and programs to
the identity of Fort Collins?
Very Important: 85%
Minimally Important: 2%
Somewhat Important: 12%
Not Important: 1%
97%
SOMEWHAT OR
VERY IMPORTANT
Impact of COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic changed
the approach to engagement initially
envisioned for this plan. The series
of open houses, pop-up events, and
interviews conducted early in the process
allowed for face-to-face engagement
with Fort Collins residents. While
additional face-to-face engagement
was not possible during the pandemic,
greater use of digital engagement tools,
including web-based meetings and the
OurCity website allowed for engagement
throughout the process.
Residents have a lot to love about the parks and
recreation system!
Lincoln Center Open House
Summary of Engagement / 93
Master Plan
Adoption
OurCity
Website
ENGAGEMENT TIMELINE
NEW PARKS &
RECREATION
MASTER PLANProject
Initiation
Stakeholder
Interviews
Stakeholder
Interviews
Advance
Review
Committee
Advance
Review
Committee
Advance
Review
Committee CIP
Workshop
City Council
Work Session
City Council
Work Session
City Council
Work Session
City Council
Work Session
Super
Issue
Meeting Pop Ups
Fall 2019 Winter 2020 Summer 2020 Fall 2020 Winter 2021
Open HousesStatistically
Valid Survey
Both open houses were well attended with
enthusiastic participation from residents.
Preston Middle School Open House
94 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
PAVED TRAILS 65%
58%
53%NATURAL AREAS
HIKING TRAILS
POOL 39%
39%
28%TRACK
EXERCISE/FITNESS
INDOOR AMENITIES
OUTDOOR AMENITIES
NATURE 44%
33%
31%FITNESS/WELLNESS
SENIORS
TYPES OF PROGRAMS
PARTICIPATING
STAKEHOLDER GROUPS
• Bicycle Colorado
• Bike Fort Collins
• CSU
• Cycles for Youth
• Downtown Business Association
• Downtown Development
Authority
• Fort Collins Areas Swim Team
• Fort Collins Baseball Club
• Fort Collins Pickleball Club
• Fort Collins Running Club
• Fort Collins Ultimate Frisbee
• Fort Collins Womens Hockey
• Larimer County Dept of the Built
Environment
• Lewis Tennis School
• Liberty Common Charter School
• Northern Colorado Disc Golf
• Overland Mountain Bike
Association
• Poudre School District
• Rocky Mountain Adventures
• Tennis Association
• Triple Crown Sports
• Twin Silo BMX
• University Bike Advisory
Committee
• Visit Fort Collins
• Your Group Ride
Stakeholder Interviews
Small group interviews of stakeholders provided an opportunity to
hear from advocacy organizations and user group about the way
they use parks and recreation in Fort Collins and the needs they and
their organizations have for parks and recreation moving forward. All
of the organizations listed at right participated in these interviews.
Statistically Valid Survey
In addition to in-person and online engagement, a statistically valid
survey was conducted in the winter of 2019 by mail, phone, and
web to measure residents’ needs across Fort Collins. The goal was
to receive at least 500 completed surveys. The goal was exceeded
with a total of 511 completed surveys. The demographic makeup
of the survey sample reflects the demographic makeup of the city
as a whole. With this sample size, the results of the survey have a
precision of at least ±4.33% at the 95% level of confidence. Results
from the survey and other engagement forums influenced the plan’s
recommendations and are interspersed in the goals and actions
section. Selected additional results of the survey can be found in
Appendix page 338.
Figure 14. Trails and nature programs rated as some of the highest
amenities.
Top amenities by percentage of respondents who selected the items as one of their top
four choices
Summary of Engagement / 95
CITY COUNCIL
ENGAGEMENT
At milestones in the process, City Council was briefed on plan
progress at work sessions and subcommittee meetings. The work
sessions were broadcast on FCTV and recorded for on-demand
streaming.
Work Sessions
The first work session was held on October 22, 2019 with the
purpose of introducing the plan and gaining feedback on plan
outcomes and outreach strategies.
On June 9, 2020, City Council was presented with an overview of the
plan, a brief history of the public space system, access standards,
system imageability, an overview of engagement, and drafts of the
plan’s vision statement, goals, and policy framework.
On August 25, 2020, City Council was presented with proposed
park and recreation facility classifications, park and facility design
guidelines, levels of service, and policy framework highlights.
A draft plan was presented to City Council on October 27, 2020.
Finance Committee Meetings
The consultant team also presented to the Council Finance
Committee on September 21, 2020 to get input on funding strategies
for parks and recreation.
City Council work sessions were used to brief
councilmembers on master plan progress.
Work Session 8/25/2020
The demographic makeup of the statistically
valid survey’s respondents closely match the that
of the city.
Demographic Makeup of Statistically Valid Survey
Respondents and City Residents
Black: 2%
Asian: 3%Native American: 2%
Other: 1%
Survey
Breakdown
White: 91%
Other: 3.5%Asian: 3.4%
Black: 1.6%
Native American: 0.9%
City
Breakdown
White: 88.9%
GUIDELINES FOR
PARKS AND FACILITIES
98 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 99
CAPITAL AND
PROGRAM
LIFE CYCLES
Capital facilities, including parks and recreation facilities,
go through various phases of a life cycle. New facilities
are planned, built, and operated. Recreation programs
go through a similar life cycle. New programs are
introduced, become mature, and may eventually be
retired. Periodically, facilities and programs must be
evaluated to ensure that they are still serving their
intended purpose. If they are not, improvements may be
needed.
Newer playgrounds like that at Crescent Park
raise the standard across the city.
Crescent Park
100 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
CAPITAL FACILITY PHASES
Acquire & Master Plan
The City acquires and assembles the land, identifies a raw water
irrigation source (when available), and prepares a master plan that
sets site-specific goals, outlines intended site usage and amenities,
and includes a preliminary site layout. The master planning process
typically includes community engagement.
Design
Following a current site master plan, the City develops construction
drawings for needed onsite and offsite improvements. These
improvements may include raw water delivery systems, utility
infrastructure improvements, and stormwater enhancements, in
addition to development of park amenities, plantings, and structures.
Build
The City secures a contractor or contractors needed to build the
park through a traditional bid process or through alternative project
delivery methods such as CMGC (Construction Manager General
Contractor). The City works with the contractor throughout the
construction process to complete the project.
Operate
The City operates the park or facility with staff to support residents'
ongoing use.
Evaluate
Periodically, the City evaluates whether a park or facility is still
serving its intended purpose. If not, improvements may be needed.
The criteria listed at right are used to evaluate the park or facility.
CAPITAL FACILITY ACTIONS
New Park/Facility
New parks or facilities may be needed to address overall level of
service needs, as described in the Level of Service section of this
plan (See p. 161).
Maintain
The park or facility is maintained to keep it in a good state of repair.
Life Cycle Replacement
A particular amenity, or a few amenities, have reached the end of
their usable life, where they can no longer effectively be maintained,
and are replaced in kind—though potentially with updated versions
of like amenities.
Evaluation Criteria
Community Needs
Are the community's needs being met?
This can be answered by using city-wide
engagement feedback gathered through
this plan (See p. 91) or through
additional engagement.
Usage
How well is the site being used?
This can be answered by observing and
counting the number of users over a period
of time. Underuse and overuse can be an
issue.
Condition of Existing Amenities
What is the condition of existing
amenities?
This can be answered through site
inspection, observing whether amenities are
in good condition or need to be replaced.
Design and Function
Is the overall design still relevant, and
does it enhance the user experience? Does
the park or facility and its systems still
function as designed?
This can be answered using the design
guidelines in this plan (See p. 105) and
through a maintenance and repair audit.
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 101
ACQUIRE &
MASTER PLAN MAJOR REFRESH
MINOR REFRESH
LIFE CYCLE REPLACEMENT
MAINTAIN
Usage
Condition of
Existing
Amenities
Design and
Function
Community
Needs
well used good still relevantbeing met
well used
a few need to
be replaced still relevantbeing met
underused
a few need to
be replaced need tweaks
some unmet,
space available
underused or
overused
many need to
be replaced
need to be
rethought
many unmet,
space available
underused poor not relevantmet elsewhere
DIVEST
DESIGN
BUILD
OPERATE
EVALUATE
NEW PARK/FACILITY
Minor Refresh
The current site master plan is still valid, but there are unmet
community needs, the site is underused, a few amenities have
reached the end of their usable life, plantings need to be refreshed,
or elements of the design or function need to be rethought,
requiring new design thinking.
Major Refresh
Enough community needs are unmet, the site is underused or
overused, enough amenities have reached the end of their usable
life, plantings need to be refreshed, and the design direction from
the site master plan is no longer valid. A new master plan is needed.
Divest
When a park or facility is no longer serving its intended purpose
and community needs are being met elsewhere, it may not be worth
continued investment.
Figure 15. Parks and recreation facilities need to
be evaluated throughout their life to determine if
they are still meeting community needs.
Park & Recreation Facility Phases
102 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
PROGRAM LIFE CYCLES
Recreation programs go through a life cycle. Understanding where
a program is in its life cycle can inform strategic decisions about the
overall recreation program portfolio. The various stages of program
lifecycles are:
• Introduction: new program, modest participation
• Take Off: rapid participation growth
• Growth: moderate, but consistent, participation growth
• Mature: slow participation growth
• Saturated: minimal to no growth, extreme competition
• Decline: declining participation
Determining what stage in its life cycle a program is in relies not only
on quantitative data, but on staff knowledge.
Overall, Fort Collins has a strong distribution of programs across
the program life cycle. A combined total of 13.5% of programs fall
into the saturated and decline stages, which is slightly over the
best practice of up to 10%. Intermediate activity level programs,
particularly sports programs, are responsible for the higher-than-
desired percentage of programs in these stages. While best practices
suggest this number should be lower, it is natural for programs to
eventually evolve into saturation and decline. If programs never reach
these stages, it is an indication that the program offerings may be
“over-tweaked,” abbreviating their natural evolution. This prevents
programs from reaching their maximum participation, efficiency, and
effectiveness.
As programs enter into the decline stage, they must be closely
reviewed and evaluated for repositioning or elimination. When this
occurs, programs should be modified to begin a new life cycle, or
new programs can be added based upon community needs and
trends.
OVERALL PROGRAMS: LIFECYCLE STAGE
Number of Programs Percentage of Programs Current Distribution in
Fort Collins
Best Practice
Distribution
Introduction 47 13%
57.3%50-60%Take-Off 27 8%
Growth 130 37%
Mature 104 29%29.2%40%
Saturated 28 8%
13.5%0-10%
Decline 20 6%
Total 356 100%100%100%
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 103
While it is important to provide new programs to align with trends
and help meet the evolving needs of the community, it is also
important to have a stable core segment of programs that are in the
mature stage. Currently, 29.2% of programs are in this stage, lower
than the best practice of 40%. Having more programs in the mature
stage provides stability to the overall program portfolio. Programs in
the mature stage should be closely monitored to determine if they
are entering the saturated or decline stages.
A total of 57.3% of programs are in the introduction, take-off, and
growth stages, in alignment with best practices. The City must allow
these programs one to two years to reach the maturation stage. It
requires patience to prevent programs from being canceled too soon
after introducing them to the community.
Nature programs rated among some of the most important to residents.
Outdoor Education Program
104 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 105
DESIGN
GUIDELINES
Design guidelines are a road map for designing new
parks and recreation facility sites and refreshing
existing ones—or determining whether sites need to be
refreshed. They help ensure that parks and recreation
facilities are connected to their surroundings, have
a strong community presence, and respect natural
systems. At a minimum, they help meet resident
expectations. For example, people expect a new park or
recreation facility to meet a certain level of excellence
and safety. Design guidelines make this effort easier to
achieve.
Design guidelines ensure that parks are
connected to their surroundings.
Spring Canyon Park
106 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following design guidelines are meant to ensure that park and
recreation facility sites are well integrated into their surroundings
and provide the best experiences for visitors. They address overall
design, site context, access and connectivity, wayfinding, and various
zones of use within the site. The guidelines are intended to inform:
• the development of framework plans
• the periodic evaluation of parks and recreation facilities to
determine if they’re functioning as intended
• the design of refreshed or new parks
Following the list of design guidelines are diagrams showing how
they apply to a prototypical park of each classification.
DESIGN
System Wide Language
Use a consistent design language throughout the system .
Signage and wayfinding elements should be consistent from one
park or recreation facility to another, especially for schoolside parks,
neighborhood parks, and mini-parks. Community parks provide
opportunity for more unique design expressions. Having a consistent
design language helps identify a park or recreation facility as being
part of the Fort Collins public space system and helps users feel
more comfortable visiting parks or recreation facilities they may be
unfamiliar with. Consistency does not, however, preclude unique
identity features.
Design Vocabulary
Ensure the vocabulary of design is appropriate for the scale and
materials of the landscape and existing infrastructure .
Particularly on larger sites, landscape and architectural design
elements should respond to the scale and aesthetic of their context.
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 107
CONTEXT
Mixed-Use
Ensure a mix of uses around parks and recreation facilities .
A mix of uses expands the user base, particularly at street
intersections where people are traveling in multiple directions and
encourages activity through a longer part of the day. The number
and mix of uses may vary by size, type, and location.
Building Frontage/Entrances
Ensure that buildings adjacent to and across the street from parks
and recreation facilities have frontages or entrances designed to
face them .
Buildings with active ground floor uses that face parks and
recreation facilities help frame the space and provide “eyes on the
park.” Such visibility from adjacent uses enhances the perception
of safety. Building entrances adjacent to a park or recreation facility
provide a built-in user-base. In addition, proximity to parks and
recreation facilities is correlated with higher property values—
benefiting property owners.
Streetscape Enhancements
Surround parks and recreation facilities with enhanced
streetscapes .
Streets surrounding parks and recreation facilities should be treated
as extensions of those facilities. Trees, planters, rain gardens, and
other features provide a visual cue to all street users that a park
or recreation facility is nearby. Streetscape enhancements should
conform to Fort Collins’ Streetscape Standards.
ACCESS AND CONNECTIVITY
Seamless Public Space
Ensure seamless connections between parks and recreation
facilities and other adjacent public spaces .
Residents do not typically perceive differences between ownership,
but they do perceive differences in experiences and missing
connections. Barriers and breaks in access limit attractiveness and
viability. Regional ecosystems also do not observe jurisdictional
boundaries and must be thought of as integrated, functional
systems.
Street Grid Connectivity
Maintain physical and visual connections to the street grid .
Parks and recreation facilities should fit into the fabric of the
neighborhoods they are in. They should be sited to minimize
disruptions to the street grid, which is integral to a functional
transportation network. Where streets do not continue through a
park or recreation facility site, efforts should be made to maintain
physical and visual connections, such as gateways, or sight lines or
walking paths through the site, in line with those streets.
108 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Safe Pedestrian Access
Ensure adequate sidewalks and safe pedestrian crossings .
While street frontage can encourage usage and increase safety, too
much vehicular traffic can deter pedestrians. Sidewalks and safe
crossings, whether at intersections or mid-block, encourage access
and allow pedestrians to feel comfortable that they are protected.
Trail Connections
Maintain connections to the paved trail network .
Trail users are park and recreation facility users. Parks and recreation
facilities can serve as trailheads, trail destinations, or locations to
stop and rest along a trail. Parks and recreation facilities may also
host critical trail links, leading to a more connected system.
Trail Mode Separation
Separate trails into pedestrian and bicycle paths .
On larger sites, where there is space to separate faster-moving
bicycles and slower-moving pedestrians, splitting trails can reduce
conflicts while signaling to trail users that they are in a park or
recreation space. Trails may have different materials for different
uses. For instance, a walking trail may be finished with stone fines as
opposed to an asphalt bike trail.
Bike Connections
Maintain connections to the low-stress bicycle network .
Where trail connections are not possible, the low-stress bicycle
network can provide safe, easy routes for cyclists of all ages and
abilities to connect with parks and recreation facilities. Bicycle racks
and tune-up stations should be provided where possible to enable
and encourage bicycle access.
Transit Connections
Connect parks and recreation facilities to transit .
As with trails, transit users are park and recreation facility users
and vice versa. Particular types of parks, such as plazas, may relate
directly to a Transfort station or stop or to a rideshare drop-off,
providing a sense of place and spaces to welcome and send off
visitors.
Shared Parking
Pursue shared parking strategies to eliminate or reduce on-site
surface parking .
Particularly in higher density areas, where space is at a premium, and
where parks and recreation facilities abut each other or other public
facilities, on-site surface parking is difficult to justify. In addition to
on-street parking, shared parking may be a better option than losing
valuable on-site area to parking.
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 109
Visible Frontage
Ensure that parks and recreation facilities are visible from streets,
trails, and adjacent uses .
Being able to see what is going on within a park or recreation facility
can pique the interest of a passerby and increase patronage as well
as increase the perception of safety.
WAYFINDING
Gateways
Create gateway features at major entrances to parks and
recreation facilities .
Gateway features clearly indicate major entrances and signal to
visitors that they are welcome to enter. Architectural, landscape,
art, and/or signage features may be used to indicate a gateway. The
placement and design of gateway features can guide users to use
specific routes through park and recreation facility sites.
Path Hierarchy
Ensure on-site paths have a clear hierarchy .
Establish a hierarchy of paths that offer a range of experiences for
diverse users, access to destinations, and connections to surrounding
circulation networks. Provide consistent widths and surface materials
based on path hierarchy and user.
Support Facilities
Provide areas for facilities that support the use of parks and
recreation facilities .
In order for parks and recreation facilities to function optimally,
it is necessary to include facilities, such as restrooms and water
fountains, to support their use. Appropriate support facilities may
vary by park or facility type.
110 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
ZONES
Intensive Use Areas
Design spaces that can accommodate intensive use .
Parks and recreation facilities may attract large numbers of users
due to the density of their surroundings, their integration into
pedestrian and bicycle travel routes, and their use as event and
gathering spaces. This high level of usage can impact the integrity
of the space. Areas that are expected to be heavily used—for
example, near entrances or gathering spaces—should be designed
to accommodate that level of use, perhaps incorporating more
hardscape areas or more resilient landscape plantings, but still
be designed to feel comfortable even when large events are not
occurring.
Programmable Spaces
Provide flexible open spaces that can be used as gathering spaces .
Parks and recreation facilities often serve as community gathering
spaces, from small get-togethers to large events. Areas should be
designed to be flexible enough to accommodate these events while
serving as space for informal play, picnicking, or other uses between
events. These spaces may include both paved and soft surfaces and
include amenities such as amphitheaters for performances.
Recreation Areas
Provide areas and facilities that are specifically designed for
recreation and are responsive to the needs of surrounding
neighborhoods .
How parks and recreation facilities are used, and the degree to which
they are used, depends on how well they respond to the needs of
those who live near them. This may include both traditional and
unique facilities and spaces.
Casual Use Spaces
Provide areas that are specifically designed for casual, impromptu
use .
Just as important as programmed spaces are unprogrammed areas
intentionally designed for people to enjoy a park or recreation
facility without being displaced by programmed uses. Such casual
use spaces may include areas for sitting (e.g., seating, walls, steps),
picnicking, or playing a game of catch.
IU
PS
RA
CS
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 111
NA Natural System Areas
Define areas that focus on the enhancement and function of
natural systems .
Natural environments, including habitat areas, woodlands, wetlands,
and stream corridors are not always thought of as predominant
components of parks and recreation facilities. Yet, natural systems
do not stop at site boundaries. In addition, parks and recreation
facilities are the closest opportunities to interact with natural spaces
in some neighborhoods. Incorporating best stormwater management
practices, enhancing existing ecosystems, providing habitat, and
planting diverse landscapes can maximize the function of natural
systems and enhance the user experience. Native, low-water-use
or drought tolerant species establish climate-resilient and drought
tolerant areas.
Floodplains
Avoid overbuilding in flood-prone areas .
The potential for inundation makes some uses more or less
compatible with floodplains. Healthy wetland ecologies and systems
should be prioritized and paths should be hardened in all floodplains,
while recreational assets should be minimized. Buildings in the 500-
year floodplain should be minimized, and they should be avoided in
the 100-year floodplain.
FEATURES
Loop Trail
Provide a loop trail for people to explore, circulate, and recreate .
Loop trails provide opportunities for people to see parts of a park
or recreation facility site that they may not otherwise be aware of.
When they are a specifically measured length, they allow users to
easily walk, jog, bike, or skate to a number of steps or miles they may
be targeting for exercise and wellness.
Identity Features
Incorporate features that can lend identity to a park or recreation
facility .
Much as gateways can use architectural, landscape, art, and/or
signage features to indicate access, the same types of features can
become a park or recreation facility’s signature. Decorative arches,
sculptures, or water fountains are examples of identity features that
may attract users and serve as landmarks for meeting people or
giving directions.
Natural or Historic Features
Preserve and enhance naturally or historically significant features .
Natural features, such as wetlands, stream corridors, or historic
features, such as historic structures or routes, add interest and
preserve experiences that are rare or unique. These features become
destinations themselves and attract local and regional visitors. Parks
and recreation facilities with naturally or historically significant
features provide opportunities for interpretation and education.
112 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
CS
CS
RA
RANA
IU
IU
PS
PS
CSRA
RA
NA
PS
APPLYING THE GUIDELINES
The following diagrams illustrate how the various design guidelines
apply to different park classifications. Enlargements of each
diagram can be found in the following section on park and facility
classifications.
Community Park Schoolside Park
Design
n SYSTEMWIDE DESIGN LANGUAGE
n DESIGN VOCABULARY
Context
n MIXED-USE
n BUILDING FRONTAGE / ENTRANCE
n STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Access and Connectivity
n SEAMLESS PUBLIC SPACE
n STREET GRID CONNECTIVITY
n SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
n MAJOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS
n TRAIL MODE SEPARATION
n BIKE CONNECTIONS
n TRANSIT CONNECTIONS
n SHARED PARKING
n VISIBLE FRONTAGE
Wayfinding
n GATEWAYS
n PATH HIERARCHY
n SUPPORT FACILITIES
NA
IU
PS
RA
CS
Zones
n INTENSIVE USE AREAS
n PROGRAMMABLE GATHERING
SPACES
n RECREATION AREAS
n CASUAL USE SPACES
n NATURAL SYSTEM AREAS
n FLOODPLAINS
Features
n LOOP TRAIL
n IDENTITY FEATURES
n NATURAL OR HISTORIC FEATURES
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 113
CS
RA
NA
PS
CS
RA
NA
IU PS
IU
CS
IU
PS
CS
NA
Neighborhood Park
Plaza
Urban Park
Mini Park
114 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 115
PARK AND
RECREATION
FACILITY
CLASSIFICATIONS
The City of Fort Collins has parks and recreation facilities
of different sizes and uses. Together these places form
the active heart of the city’s public space system.
Currently, the City uses two park classifications—
community parks and neighborhood parks. Community
parks are generally differentiated from neighborhood
parks by their large sizes, which can accommodate
more amenities, and unique identities. The City does not
currently classify recreation facilities.
However, the system of parks and recreation facilities
encompasses a broad range of places that differ in size,
amenities, design, usage, and programming. Additionally,
as parts of Fort Collins continue to see increased
density, new types of parks and recreation facilities will
be needed. The expanded classification system in this
plan is meant to help set mutual expectations between
the City and residents about how different parks and
recreation facilities look and function.
Special Use facilities give residents unique
recreational opportunities.
Pottery Studio
116 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
CLASSIFICATIONS
The new park and recreation facility classification system in this
plan expands the existing classification system both to clarify how
existing parks and recreation facilities function and to provide
guidelines about future park and recreation facility typologies that
Fort Collins expects to build in the future to meet the needs of
current and future residents.
Park Classifications
• community parks
• neighborhood parks
• schoolside parks (new)
• urban parks (new)
• plazas (new)
• mini parks (new)
• special use parks (new)
Recreation Facility Classifications
• community centers (new)
• neighborhood centers (new)
• indoor/outdoor sports complexes (new)
• court/field clusters (new)
• special use facilities (new)
For each park and recreation facility classification, the following
pages include a general description of the classification, a typical
size range, a typical length of visit, access provisions, a list of
appropriate amenities for that type of park or recreation facility, and
applicable design guidelines. (Descriptions of the design guidelines
can be found in the previous section)
The list of amenities is not meant to be prescriptive or exhaustive.
The appropriate amenities for any individual park or recreation
facility should be determined through a regular master planning
process that involves the community it is meant to serve. All parks
and recreation facilities should be designed to serve multiple age
segments and a diversity of users.
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 117H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES BY CLASSIFICATION
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
COMMUNITY PARKS (9)COMMUNITY CENTERS (2)
SPECIAL USE FACILITIES (6)
URBAN PARKS (3)
SCHOOLSIDE PARKS (14)NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS (1)PLAZAS (2)
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS (19)INDOOR/OUTDOOR COMPLEXES (0)SPECIAL USE PARKS (4)
MINI PARKS (10)
COURT/FIELD CLUSTERS (1)
118 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
COMMUNITY PARKS
Community parks are the largest parks, with many over seventy-five
acres in size. These parks serve several adjoining neighborhoods,
attracting residents from a relatively large area. They should include
both active and passive recreation activities, preserve unique
landscapes and open spaces, allow for group activities, be able
to accommodate community events, and offer unique recreation
opportunities not feasible or desirable at the neighborhood park
level. Community parks may also include revenue-producing
facilities, recreation or community centers, or other recreation
facilities. They should include a permanent and accessible public
restroom.
Size
40 – 150 acres
Length of Visit
1 – 5 hours
Access
Community parks should be accessible by
way of the city’s trail network, low stress
bicycle network, sidewalks, and major
streets. Since they serve residents from
longer distances, community parks should
have on site parking.
As the newest community park in the city, Twin
Silo Community Park sets a new standard in Fort
Collins.
Shelter at Twin Silo Park
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 119
TYPICAL AMENITIES
Passive Recreation
n SEATING
n CASUAL USE SPACES
n COMMUNITY GARDENS
n INTERNAL WALKING TRAILS
n UNIQUE LANDSCAPE FEATURES
n NATURAL SPACES
Active Recreation
n BIKING TRAILS
n OUTDOOR FITNESS / EXERCISE FACILITIES
n CREATIVE PLAY ATTRACTIONS
n PLAYGROUNDS
n RECTANGULAR FIELDS
n DIAMOND FIELDS
n BASKETBALL COURTS
n TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURTS
n VOLLEYBALL COURTS
n WATER PLAY
Facilities
n DOG PARKS
n INDIVIDUAL PICNIC / SITTING AREAS
n GROUP PICNIC AREAS
n PARK SHELTERS
n OUTDOOR EVENT SPACES
n RESTROOMS
EXISTING PARKS
CITY PARK: 76.7 ACRES
EDORA COMMUNITY PARK: 85.4 ACRES
FOSSIL CREEK COMMUNITY PARK: 95.9 ACRES
LEE MARTINEZ COMMUNITY PARK: 85.7 ACRES
ROLLAND MOORE COMMUNITY PARK: 76.2 ACRES
SPRING CANYON COMMUNITY PARK: 123.9 ACRES
TWIN SILO COMMUNITY PARK: 53.0 ACRES
PARKS IN PROGRESS
EAST COMMUNITY PARK: 58.0 ACRES
NORTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK: 73.0 ACRES
A community garden reflects the agricultural
heritage of Fort Collins.
Rolland Moore Park
120 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
CS
CS
RA
RANA
IU
IU
PS
PS
COMMUNITY PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES
NA
IU
PS
RA
CS
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 121
Design
n SYSTEMWIDE DESIGN LANGUAGE
n DESIGN VOCABULARY
Context
n MIXED-USE
n BUILDING FRONTAGE / ENTRANCE
n STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Access and Connectivity
n SEAMLESS PUBLIC SPACE
n STREET GRID CONNECTIVITY
n SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
n MAJOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS
n TRAIL MODE SEPARATION
n BIKE CONNECTIONS
n TRANSIT CONNECTIONS
n SHARED PARKING
n VISIBLE FRONTAGE
Wayfinding
n GATEWAYS
n PATH HIERARCHY
n SUPPORT FACILITIES
Zones
n INTENSIVE USE AREAS
n PROGRAMMABLE GATHERING SPACES
n RECREATION AREAS
n CASUAL USE SPACES
n NATURAL SYSTEM AREAS
n FLOODPLAINS
Features
n LOOP TRAIL
n IDENTITY FEATURES
n NATURAL OR HISTORIC FEATURES
122 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Neighborhood parks serve the needs of residents within walking
distance of their homes. Neighborhood parks should strike a balance
between passive and active recreational opportunities. They are
intended for residents from adjacent neighborhoods and should not
seek to attract visitors from too much further.
A reflection of history and culture in park design.
Sugar Beet Park Playground
Size
5 – 20 acres
Length of Visit
1 – 3 hours
Access
Neighborhood parks should be accessible
by way of the city’s sidewalks, low-stress
bicycle network, and local streets. They
should be easily accessible from the
surrounding neighborhood with no physical
barriers or busy streets restricting access.
Where possible, trails should also connect to
neighborhood parks. Neighborhood parks
should have street parking nearby.
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 123
EXISTING PARKS
AVERY PARK: 6.2 ACRES
BUCKINGHAM PARK: 5.2 ACRES
COTTONWOOD GLEN PARK: 13.2 ACRES
CRESCENT PARK: 7.2 ACRES
GREENBRIAR PARK: 22.8 ACRES
LANDINGS PARK: 8.7 ACRES
LEGACY PARK: 8.9 ACRES
MIRAMONT PARK: 11.4 ACRES
OLD FORT COLLINS HERITAGE PARK: 10.7 ACRES
OVERLAND PARK: 19.9 ACRES
REGISTRY PARK: 6.3 ACRES
RICHARDS LAKE PARK: 6.8 ACRES
ROGERS PARK: 8.3 ACRES
ROSSBOROUGH PARK: 16.8 ACRES
SOFT GOLD PARK: 16.1 ACRES
SPRING PARK: 16.8 ACRES
SUGARBEET PARK: 7.2 ACRES
WARREN PARK: 24.4 ACRES
WATERS WAY PARK: 8.2 ACRES
NEW PARKS IN PROGRESS
FUTURE TRAIL HEAD PARK: 4.0 ACRES
FUTURE EASTRIDGE PARK: TBD
FUTURE BUCKING HORSE PARK: TBD
FUTURE FOSSIL LAKE PARK: TBD
FUTURE INTERSTATE PARK: TBD
TYPICAL AMENITIES
Passive Recreation
n SEATING
n CASUAL USE SPACES
n COMMUNITY GARDENS
n INTERNAL WALKING TRAILS
n UNIQUE LANDSCAPE FEATURES
n NATURAL SPACES
Active Recreation
`BIKING TRAILS
n OUTDOOR FITNESS / EXERCISE FACILITIES
n CREATIVE PLAY ATTRACTIONS
n PLAYGROUNDS
n RECTANGULAR FIELDS
`DIAMOND FIELDS
n BASKETBALL COURTS
`TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURTS
n VOLLEYBALL COURTS
`WATER PLAY
Facilities
`DOG PARKS
n INDIVIDUAL PICNIC / SITTING AREAS
`GROUP PICNIC AREAS
n PARK SHELTERS
`OUTDOOR EVENT SPACES
n RESTROOMS
Native grasslands integrated into a neighborhood park.
Crescent Park
124 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
CS
RA
NA
PS
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES
NA
IU
PS
RA
CS
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 125
Design
n SYSTEMWIDE DESIGN LANGUAGE
n DESIGN VOCABULARY
Context
`MIXED-USE
`BUILDING FRONTAGE / ENTRANCE
n STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Access and Connectivity
n SEAMLESS PUBLIC SPACE
n STREET GRID CONNECTIVITY
n SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
`MAJOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS
`TRAIL MODE SEPARATION
n BIKE CONNECTIONS
`TRANSIT CONNECTIONS
`SHARED PARKING
n VISIBLE FRONTAGE
Wayfinding
n GATEWAYS
`PATH HIERARCHY
n SUPPORT FACILITIES
Zones
`INTENSIVE USE AREAS
n PROGRAMMABLE GATHERING SPACES
n RECREATION AREAS
n CASUAL USE SPACES
n NATURAL SYSTEM AREAS
n FLOODPLAINS
Features
n LOOP TRAIL
n IDENTITY FEATURES
n NATURAL OR HISTORIC FEATURES
126 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
SCHOOLSIDE PARKS
Schoolside parks are neighborhood parks, generally larger than
five acres, that are on or adjacent to school property. Due to the
their school adjacencies, they have unique conditions that differ
from other neighborhood parks. They allow for a fluid boundary
and shared amenities between parks and schools, leveraging these
adjacencies to provide larger public spaces than neighborhood
parks alone. Schoolside parks should include both active and
passive recreation activities and may include specialized recreational
amenities that support both school and park programs. Schoolside
parks present opportunities to partner with school districts on
cooperative programming, access, and maintenance.
Size
5 – 20 acres
Length of Visit
1 – 3 hours
Access
Schoolside parks should be accessible
by way of the city’s low-stress bicycle
network, sidewalks, and major streets.
Where possible, trails should also connect to
schoolside parks. Schoolside parks should
also be accessible from the schools that
they are adjacent to, allowing for users of
both to pass between the two seamlessly.
Schoolside parks and schools should share
off-street parking.
Schoolside parks can provide seamless public
space with adjacent schools.
Eastside Park
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 127
EXISTING PARKS
BEATTIE PARK: 8.8 ACRES
BLEVINS PARK: 6.6 ACRES
BOLTZ PARK: 9.5 ACRES
EASTSIDE PARK: 3.2 ACRES
ENGLISH RANCH PARK: 12.7 ACRES
GOLDEN MEADOWS PARK: 11.6 ACRES
HARMONY PARK: 15.2 ACRES
HOMESTEAD PARK: 5.9 ACRES
RADIANT PARK: 10.2 ACRES
RIDGEVIEW PARK: 11.2 ACRES
STEWART CASE PARK: 12.8 ACRES
TROUTMAN PARK: 18.9 ACRES
WESTFIELD PARK: 13.8 ACRES
PLANNED PARKS
BACON PARK: 5.3 ACRES
IRON HORSE PARK: 8.1 ACRES
TYPICAL AMENITIES
Passive Recreation
n SEATING
n CASUAL USE SPACES
`COMMUNITY GARDENS
n INTERNAL WALKING TRAILS
`UNIQUE LANDSCAPE FEATURES
n NATURAL SPACES
Active Recreation
n BIKING TRAILS
n OUTDOOR FITNESS / EXERCISE FACILITIES
`CREATIVE PLAY ATTRACTIONS
n PLAYGROUNDS
n RECTANGULAR FIELDS
n DIAMOND FIELDS
n BASKETBALL COURTS
n TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURTS
n VOLLEYBALL COURTS
`WATER PLAY
Facilities
`DOG PARKS
n INDIVIDUAL PICNIC / SITTING AREAS
n GROUP PICNIC AREAS
`PARK SHELTERS
n OUTDOOR EVENT SPACES
n RESTROOMS*
*In the design of new schools and schoolside parks, there
may be potential for joint use restrooms.
Enjoying events in schoolside parks.
Neighborhood Night Out at Eastside Park
128 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
CSRA
RA
NA
PS
SCHOOLSIDE PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES
NA
IU
PS
RA
CS
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 129
Design
n SYSTEMWIDE DESIGN LANGUAGE
n DESIGN VOCABULARY
Context
n MIXED-USE
n BUILDING FRONTAGE / ENTRANCE
n STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Access and Connectivity
n SEAMLESS PUBLIC SPACE
n STREET GRID CONNECTIVITY
n SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
n MAJOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS
n TRAIL MODE SEPARATION
n BIKE CONNECTIONS
n TRANSIT CONNECTIONS
n SHARED PARKING
n VISIBLE FRONTAGE
Wayfinding
n GATEWAYS
n PATH HIERARCHY
n SUPPORT FACILITIES
Zones
n INTENSIVE USE AREAS
n PROGRAMMABLE GATHERING SPACES
n RECREATION AREAS
n CASUAL USE SPACES
n NATURAL SYSTEM AREAS
n FLOODPLAINS
Features
n LOOP TRAIL
n IDENTITY FEATURES
n NATURAL OR HISTORIC FEATURES
130 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
URBAN PARKS
Urban parks are located in higher density areas. Urban parks should
have a mix of planted and paved areas. These parks should face
surrounding development, and surrounding development should
face them. Urban parks provide residents in downtown areas access
to park amenities without having to travel far from urban centers.
They should be well lit in order to extend their use and provide safe
comfortable spaces at night.Size
1 – 3 acres
Length of Visit
1 – 2 hours
Access
Urban parks should be accessible by way
of the city’s sidewalks, low-stress bicycle
network, and local streets. They should have
multiple entrances to allow for permeability
and clear access in populated urban areas.
On street parking may be located nearby.
The Fort Collins Midtown Plan proposes parks in
high density areas.
Mid Town Plan Rendering
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 131
EXISTING URBAN PARKS
CIVIC CENTER PARK: 2.7 ACRES
LIBRARY PARK: 5.5 ACRES
WASHINGTON PARK: 1.3 ACRES
TYPICAL AMENITIES
Passive Recreation
n SEATING
n CASUAL USE SPACES
`COMMUNITY GARDENS
`INTERNAL WALKING TRAILS
n UNIQUE LANDSCAPE FEATURES
`NATURAL SPACES
Active Recreation
`BIKING TRAILS
`OUTDOOR FITNESS / EXERCISE FACILITIES
`CREATIVE PLAY ATTRACTIONS
n PLAYGROUNDS
`RECTANGULAR FIELDS
`DIAMOND FIELDS
n BASKETBALL COURTS
`TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURTS
`VOLLEYBALL COURTS
n WATER PLAY
Facilities
n DOG PARKS
n INDIVIDUAL PICNIC / SITTING AREAS
`GROUP PICNIC AREAS
n PARK SHELTERS
`OUTDOOR EVENT SPACES
n RESTROOMS*
*Restrooms in urban parks will require additional
maintenance.
Library Park provides play equipment for kids in a more urban setting.
Library Park
132 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
URBAN PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES
CS
RA
NA
IU PS
IU
NA
IU
PS
RA
CS
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 133
Design
n SYSTEMWIDE DESIGN LANGUAGE
n DESIGN VOCABULARY
Context
n MIXED-USE
n BUILDING FRONTAGE / ENTRANCE
n STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Access and Connectivity
n SEAMLESS PUBLIC SPACE
n STREET GRID CONNECTIVITY
n SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
`MAJOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS
`TRAIL MODE SEPARATION
n BIKE CONNECTIONS
n TRANSIT CONNECTIONS
`SHARED PARKING
n VISIBLE FRONTAGE
Wayfinding
n GATEWAYS
`PATH HIERARCHY
n SUPPORT FACILITIES
Zones
n INTENSIVE USE AREAS
n PROGRAMMABLE GATHERING SPACES
n RECREATION AREAS
n CASUAL USE SPACES
n NATURAL SYSTEM AREAS
n FLOODPLAINS
Features
`LOOP TRAIL
`IDENTITY FEATURES
n NATURAL OR HISTORIC FEATURES
134 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
PLAZAS
Plazas are smaller spaces that are primarily paved and provide
outdoor recreation opportunities within higher density areas. They
are centers of activity throughout the year and should be designed
for four season programming and use. Plazas may have a lot of
pedestrian traffic and should include places to sit or relax. They
should also be well lit in order to extend their use and provide safe
comfortable spaces at night.Size
Up to 3 acres
Length of Visit
15 minutes – 1 hour
Access
Plazas should be accessible by way of the
city’s sidewalks and downtown streets.
Oak Street Plaza draws crowds in the middle of
winter to watch the tree lighting.
Oak Street Plaza
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 135
EXISTING PLAZAS
OAK STREET PLAZA: 0.4 ACRES
OLD TOWN SQUARE: 1.3 ACRES
LINDEN & WILLOW PLAZA: TBD
TYPICAL AMENITIES
Passive Recreation
n SEATING
n CASUAL USE SPACES
`COMMUNITY GARDENS
`INTERNAL WALKING TRAILS
`UNIQUE LANDSCAPE FEATURES
`NATURAL SPACES
Active Recreation
`BIKING TRAILS
`OUTDOOR FITNESS / EXERCISE FACILITIES
`CREATIVE PLAY ATTRACTIONS
`PLAYGROUNDS
`RECTANGULAR FIELDS
`DIAMOND FIELDS
`BASKETBALL COURTS
`TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURTS
`VOLLEYBALL COURTS
n WATER PLAY
Facilities
`DOG PARKS
`INDIVIDUAL PICNIC / SITTING AREAS
`GROUP PICNIC AREAS
`PARK SHELTERS
n OUTDOOR EVENT SPACES
`RESTROOMS
Plazas may be small, but they can accommodate
large events.
Old Town Square
136 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
PLAZA DESIGN GUIDELINES
CS
IU
PS
NA
IU
PS
RA
CS
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 137
Design
n SYSTEMWIDE DESIGN LANGUAGE
n DESIGN VOCABULARY
Context
n MIXED-USE
n BUILDING FRONTAGE / ENTRANCE
n STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Access and Connectivity
n SEAMLESS PUBLIC SPACE
n STREET GRID CONNECTIVITY
n SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
`MAJOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS
`TRAIL MODE SEPARATION
n BIKE CONNECTIONS
n TRANSIT CONNECTIONS
`SHARED PARKING
n VISIBLE FRONTAGE
Wayfinding
n GATEWAYS
`PATH HIERARCHY
n SUPPORT FACILITIES
Zones
n INTENSIVE USE AREAS
n PROGRAMMABLE GATHERING SPACES
`RECREATION AREAS
n CASUAL USE SPACES
`NATURAL SYSTEM AREAS
n FLOODPLAINS
Features
`LOOP TRAIL
n IDENTITY FEATURES
n NATURAL OR HISTORIC FEATURES
138 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
MINI PARKS
Mini parks provide places for residents to enjoy a few minutes
outside and are great ways to enhance access to walkable
recreational amenities, particularly on sites not suitable for other
uses. These parks tend to be more passive and may be simple in
their designs. Mini parks should have lawn and shade trees. They are
not programmed by the City. Size
0.5 – 3 acres
Length of Visit
30 minutes – 1 hour
Access
Mini parks should be accessible by way of
the city’s sidewalks and local streets. They
should be located away from busy streets
and noisy areas.
Mini parks can be simple in their design and still
provide amenities to residents.
Leisure Park
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 139
EXISTING MINI PARKS
ALTA VISTA PARK: 0.6 ACRES
CREEKSIDE PARK: 3.3 ACRES
FREEDOM SQUARE PARK: 0.6 ACRES
INDIAN HILLS PARK: 2.3 ACRES
LEISURE PARK: 0.9 ACRES
LILAC PARK: 1.0 ACRES
RABBIT BRUSH PARK: 1.5 ACRES
ROMERO PARK: 0.2 ACRES
SPENCER PARK: 0.5 ACRES
WOODWEST PARK: 2.8 ACRES
TYPICAL AMENITIES
Passive Recreation
n SEATING
n CASUAL USE SPACES
`COMMUNITY GARDENS
`INTERNAL WALKING TRAILS
`UNIQUE LANDSCAPE FEATURES
n NATURAL SPACES
Active Recreation
`BIKING TRAILS
`OUTDOOR FITNESS / EXERCISE FACILITIES
`CREATIVE PLAY ATTRACTIONS
n PLAYGROUNDS
`RECTANGULAR FIELDS
`DIAMOND FIELDS
n BASKETBALL COURTS
`TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURTS
n VOLLEYBALL COURTS
`WATER PLAY
Facilities
`DOG PARKS
n INDIVIDUAL PICNIC / SITTING AREAS
`GROUP PICNIC AREAS
n PARK SHELTERS
`OUTDOOR EVENT SPACES
`RESTROOMS Mini parks benefit from passive recreation space.
Woodwest Park
140 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
MINI PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES
CS
NA
NA
IU
PS
RA
CS
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 141
Design
n SYSTEMWIDE DESIGN LANGUAGE
n DESIGN VOCABULARY
Context
`MIXED-USE
`BUILDING FRONTAGE / ENTRANCE
n STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Access and Connectivity
n SEAMLESS PUBLIC SPACE
n STREET GRID CONNECTIVITY
n SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
`MAJOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS
`TRAIL MODE SEPARATION
n BIKE CONNECTIONS
`TRANSIT CONNECTIONS
`SHARED PARKING
n VISIBLE FRONTAGE
Wayfinding
`GATEWAYS
`PATH HIERARCHY
n SUPPORT FACILITIES
Zones
`INTENSIVE USE AREAS
`PROGRAMMABLE GATHERING SPACES
`RECREATION AREAS
n CASUAL USE SPACES
n NATURAL SYSTEM AREAS
n FLOODPLAINS
Features
`LOOP TRAIL
`IDENTITY FEATURES
n NATURAL OR HISTORIC FEATURES
142 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
SPECIAL USE PARKS
Special use parks are unique outdoor spaces, usually oriented toward
a single-purpose use. They can vary greatly in size.
The Poudre River Whitewater Park brings people
from across the city and beyond due to is unique
features.
Sunset at the White Water Park
Size
Varies
Length of Visit
Varies
Access
Varies
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 143
* There are no typical amenities in special use parks. Each one is
unique and requires a different set of the amenities to function
properly. This list of amenities acts more like a menu of options than
other classifications.
EXISTING SPECIAL USE PARKS
ARCHERY RANGE: 53.7 ACRES
AGGIE GREENS: 25.8 ACRES
POUDRE RIVER WHITEWATER PARK: 9.7 ACRES
TYPICAL AMENITIES*
Passive Recreation
m SEATING
m CASUAL USE SPACES
m COMMUNITY GARDENS
m INTERNAL WALKING TRAILS
m UNIQUE LANDSCAPE FEATURES
m NATURAL SPACES
Active Recreation
m BIKING TRAILS
m OUTDOOR FITNESS / EXERCISE FACILITIES
m CREATIVE PLAY ATTRACTIONS
m PLAYGROUNDS
m RECTANGULAR FIELDS
m DIAMOND FIELDS
m BASKETBALL COURTS
m TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURTS
m VOLLEYBALL COURTS
m WATER PLAY
Facilities
m DOG PARKS
m INDIVIDUAL PICNIC / SITTING AREAS
m GROUP PICNIC AREAS
m PARK SHELTERS
m OUTDOOR EVENT SPACES
m RESTROOMS
An art installation functions as a shade structure
while evoking the motion of water.
Poudre River Whitewater Park
144 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
COMMUNITY CENTERS
Community centers are large buildings that provide residents from
all over the city with places to explore fitness and wellness, play
indoor sports, learn and teach, participate in indoor and outdoor
activities, and host small or large meetings and events. They may
also offer aquatics or unique recreational experiences not found
in other centers. These facilities should have full time staff and
maintenance in order to accommodate the higher numbers of users.
Ideally, community centers should be co-located with community
parks to promote indoor/outdoor recreational opportunities.
Size
45,000 – 75,000 Sq. Ft.
Length of Visit
1 – 4 hours
Access
Community centers should be accessible by way of the city’s
sidewalks, low-stress bicycle network, Transfort, and major streets.
Because they draw people from large areas, community centers
should have on site parking.
EXISTING COMMUNITY
CENTERS
NORTHSIDE AZTLAN COMMUNITY CENTER
FORT COLLINS SENIOR CENTER*
PLANNED COMMUNITY
CENTERS
SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER**
*While the Fort Collins Senior Center has specialized
programming for adults 50 years of age and up, it
functions as a community center for all adults. Its name
may turn away prospective users.
**Current funding for the Southeast Community Center is
sufficient to construct a first phase of the full center.
Weight/cardio rooms within community centers
support residents' fitness
Northside Aztlan Community Center
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 145
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design
n SYSTEMWIDE DESIGN LANGUAGE
n DESIGN VOCABULARY
Context
n MIXED-USE
n BUILDING FRONTAGE / ENTRANCE
n STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Access and Connectivity
n SEAMLESS PUBLIC SPACE
n STREET GRID CONNECTIVITY
n SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
n MAJOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS
n TRAIL MODE SEPARATION
n BIKE CONNECTIONS
n TRANSIT CONNECTIONS
n SHARED PARKING
n VISIBLE FRONTAGE
Wayfinding
n GATEWAYS
n PATH HIERARCHY
n SUPPORT FACILITIES
Zones
n INTENSIVE USE AREAS
n PROGRAMMABLE GATHERING SPACES
n RECREATION AREAS
n CASUAL USE SPACES
n NATURAL SYSTEM AREAS
n FLOODPLAINS
Features
n LOOP TRAIL
n IDENTITY FEATURES
n NATURAL OR HISTORIC FEATURES
TYPICAL AMENITIES
Passive Recreation
n MULTI-PURPOSE MEETING ROOMS
n PERFORMANCE SPACES
n CRAFTING / MAKER SPACES
Active Recreation
n GYMNASIUM
n WEIGHT / CARDIO ROOM
n INDOOR TRACK
n POOL / AQUATICS
`RECTANGULAR FIELDS
`DIAMOND FIELDS
`TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURTS
`VOLLEYBALL COURTS
Facilities
`SPECTATOR SEATING
n CONCESSIONS / CATERING KITCHEN
n SNACKS
146 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS
Neighborhood centers are buildings that provide places to explore
fitness and wellness, learn and teach, participate in indoor activities,
and host small meetings and events. Neighborhood centers are
generally smaller than community centers and may have more
limited hours, activities, and staff. Ideally, neighborhood centers
should be co-located with parks to promote indoor/outdoor
recreational opportunities. As Fort Collins continues to grow and
needs change, it may be possible to expand neighborhood centers
into community centers.
Size
15,000 – 45,000 Sq. Ft.
Length of Visit
1 – 2 hours
Access
Neighborhood centers should be accessible by way of the city’s
sidewalks, low-stress bicycle network, Transfort, and major streets.
Neighborhood centers should include on site parking or have an
adequate amount of street parking available.
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD
CENTERS
FOOTHILLS ACTIVITY CENTER
PLANNED NEIGHBORHOOD
CENTERS
NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER
Neighborhood center facilities support
programmed and drop-in recreation.
Foothills Activity Center
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 147
TYPICAL AMENITIES
Passive Recreation
n MULTI-PURPOSE MEETING ROOMS
n PERFORMANCE SPACES
n CRAFTING / MAKER SPACES
Active Recreation
n GYMNASIUM
n WEIGHT / CARDIO ROOM
n INDOOR TRACK
n POOL / AQUATICS
`RECTANGULAR FIELDS
`DIAMOND FIELDS
`TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURTS
`VOLLEYBALL COURTS
Facilities
`SPECTATOR SEATING
`CONCESSIONS / CATERING KITCHEN
n SNACKS
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design
n SYSTEMWIDE DESIGN LANGUAGE
n DESIGN VOCABULARY
Context
n MIXED-USE
n BUILDING FRONTAGE / ENTRANCE
n STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Access and Connectivity
n SEAMLESS PUBLIC SPACE
n STREET GRID CONNECTIVITY
n SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
n MAJOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS
n TRAIL MODE SEPARATION
n BIKE CONNECTIONS
n TRANSIT CONNECTIONS
n SHARED PARKING
n VISIBLE FRONTAGE
Wayfinding
n GATEWAYS
n PATH HIERARCHY
n SUPPORT FACILITIES
Zones
n INTENSIVE USE AREAS
n PROGRAMMABLE GATHERING SPACES
n RECREATION AREAS
n CASUAL USE SPACES
n NATURAL SYSTEM AREAS
n FLOODPLAINS
Features
n LOOP TRAIL
n IDENTITY FEATURES
n NATURAL OR HISTORIC FEATURES
148 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
INDOOR/OUTDOOR SPORTS
COMPLEXES
Indoor/outdoor sports complexes are paired groups of at least 6
indoor and outdoor fields and courts that are primarily designed to
meet the general recreational needs of residents but, because of
their configuration, are well suited to host tournaments and events.
For this reason, indoor/outdoor sports complexes should provide
room for spectators and concessions or a catering kitchen, and be
located near other amenities, such as stores and restaurants, for
downtime during tournaments.
Size
100,000 - 200,000 Sq. Ft. / 80 - 90 acres
Length of Visit
1 - 6 hours
Access
Indoor/outdoor sports complexes should be accessible by sidewalks,
the low-stress bicycle network, Transfort, and major streets. They
should also be accompanied by appropriately sized on site parking
or have an adequate amount of street parking available in order to
accommodate sport tournaments.
EXISTING INDOOR/OUTDOOR
SPORTS COMPLEXES
NONE
Sport complexes allow multiple matches to take
place at once.
Okun Fieldhouse, Kansas City
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 149
TYPICAL AMENITIES
Passive Recreation
n MULTI-PURPOSE MEETING ROOMS
n PERFORMANCE SPACES
`CRAFTING / MAKER SPACES
Active Recreation
n GYMNASIUM
`WEIGHT / CARDIO ROOM
`INDOOR TRACK
n POOL / AQUATICS
n RECTANGULAR FIELDS
n DIAMOND FIELDS
n TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURTS
n VOLLEYBALL COURTS
Facilities
n SPECTATOR SEATING
n CONCESSIONS / CATERING KITCHEN
n SNACKS
150 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
CS
RA
RA
NA
IUPS
SPORTS COMPLEX DESIGN GUIDELINES
NA
IU
PS
RA
CS
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 151
Design
n SYSTEMWIDE DESIGN LANGUAGE
n DESIGN VOCABULARY
Context
n MIXED-USE
n BUILDING FRONTAGE / ENTRANCE
n STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Access and Connectivity
n SEAMLESS PUBLIC SPACE
n STREET GRID CONNECTIVITY
n SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
n MAJOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS
n TRAIL MODE SEPARATION
n BIKE CONNECTIONS
n TRANSIT CONNECTIONS
n SHARED PARKING
n VISIBLE FRONTAGE
Wayfinding
n GATEWAYS
n PATH HIERARCHY
n SUPPORT FACILITIES
Zones
n INTENSIVE USE AREAS
n PROGRAMMABLE GATHERING SPACES
n RECREATION AREAS
n CASUAL USE SPACES
n NATURAL SYSTEM AREAS
n FLOODPLAINS
Features
`LOOP TRAIL
n IDENTITY FEATURES
n NATURAL OR HISTORIC FEATURES
152 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
COURT/FIELD CLUSTERS
Court/field clusters are groups of fields or courts with a clubhouse
or pro shop. These facilities may also attract local tournaments and
spectators. Court/field clusters are not independent facilities, but
generally located within community parks or schoolside parks.
Size
1 -2 Acres
Length of Visit
1 - 3 hours
Access
Court/field clusters should be accessible by way of the city’s
sidewalks and arterial and collector streets. They should also be
accompanied by appropriately sized on site parking or have an
adequate amount of street parking available.
EXISTING COURT/FIELD
CLUSTERS
ROLLAND MOORE TENNIS CLUSTER
Court/field clusters often host tournaments
since multiple games can happen take place
simultaneously.
Rolland Moore Tennis Cluster
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 153
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design
n SYSTEMWIDE DESIGN LANGUAGE
n DESIGN VOCABULARY
Context
n MIXED-USE
`BUILDING FRONTAGE / ENTRANCE
`STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Access and Connectivity
n SEAMLESS PUBLIC SPACE
n STREET GRID CONNECTIVITY
n SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
n MAJOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS
n TRAIL MODE SEPARATION
n BIKE CONNECTIONS
`TRANSIT CONNECTIONS
`SHARED PARKING
n VISIBLE FRONTAGE
Wayfinding
n GATEWAYS
n PATH HIERARCHY
n SUPPORT FACILITIES
Zones
n INTENSIVE USE AREAS
n PROGRAMMABLE GATHERING SPACES
n RECREATION AREAS
`CASUAL USE SPACES
n NATURAL SYSTEM AREAS
n FLOODPLAINS
Features
`LOOP TRAIL
n IDENTITY FEATURES
n NATURAL OR HISTORIC FEATURES
TYPICAL AMENITIES
Passive Recreation
`MULTI-PURPOSE MEETING ROOMS
`PERFORMANCE SPACES
`CRAFTING / MAKER SPACES
Active Recreation
`GYMNASIUM
`WEIGHT / CARDIO ROOM
`INDOOR TRACK
`POOL / AQUATICS
n RECTANGULAR FIELDS
n DIAMOND FIELDS
n TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURTS
n VOLLEYBALL COURTS
Facilities
n SPECTATOR SEATING
`CONCESSIONS / CATERING KITCHEN
n SNACKS
154 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
SPECIAL USE FACILITIES
Special use facilities are unique indoor/outdoor spaces designed
around a single use or activity. These facilities provide residents
with specific programs that may require special gear, equipment, or
building structures. Special use facilities may be located within or
adjacent to parks or be standalone facilities.
Size
Varies
Length of Visit
Varies
Access
Special use facilities should be accessible by way of the city’s
sidewalks, low-stress bicycle network, Transfort, and major streets.
Because they offer unique experiences, special use facilities draw
people from a larger area and should have appropriately sized on
site parking.
EXISTING SPECIAL USE
FACILITIES
CITY PARK POOL
CLUB TICO
EDORA POOL AND ICE CENTER
THE FARM
MULBERRY POOL
THE POTTERY STUDIO
The Pottery Studio offers unique and interesting
programs that cannot be found elsewhere.
Pottery Studio
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 155
TYPICAL AMENITIES
Passive Recreation
m MULTI-PURPOSE MEETING ROOMS
m OUTDOOR EVENT SPACES
m CRAFTING / MAKER SPACES
Active Recreation
m GYMNASIUM
m WEIGHT / CARDIO ROOM
m INDOOR TRACK
m POOL / AQUATICS
m RECTANGULAR FIELDS
m DIAMOND FIELDS
m TENNIS/PICKLEBALL COURTS
m VOLLEYBALL COURTS
Facilities
m SPECTATOR SEATING
m CONCESSIONS / CATERING KITCHEN
m SNACKS
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design
n SYSTEMWIDE DESIGN LANGUAGE
n DESIGN VOCABULARY
Context
m MIXED-USE
m BUILDING FRONTAGE / ENTRANCE
m STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Access and Connectivity
m SEAMLESS PUBLIC SPACE
m STREET GRID CONNECTIVITY
m SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
m MAJOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS
m TRAIL MODE SEPARATION
m BIKE CONNECTIONS
m TRANSIT CONNECTIONS
m SHARED PARKING
m VISIBLE FRONTAGE
Wayfinding
m GATEWAYS
m PATH HIERARCHY
m SUPPORT FACILITIES
Zones
m INTENSIVE USE AREAS
m PROGRAMMABLE GATHERING SPACES
m RECREATION AREAS
m CASUAL USE SPACES
m NATURAL SYSTEM AREAS
m FLOODPLAINS
Features
m LOOP TRAIL
m IDENTITY FEATURES
m NATURAL OR HISTORIC FEATURES
* There are no typical amenities in special
use parks. Each one is unique and requires
a different set of the amenities to function
properly. This list of amenities acts more like
a menu of options than other classifications.
156 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
AMENITIES COMMUN- ITY PARKS
SCHOOL- SIDE PARKS
NEIGH-BORHOOD PARKS
URBAN PARKS PLAZAS MINI PARKS SPECIAL USE PARKS
Passive Recreation
Seating —
Casual Use Spaces —
Community Gardens —
Internal Walking Trails —
Unique Landscape Features —
Natural Spaces —
Active Recreation
Biking Trails —
Outdoor Fitness/Exercise —
Creative Play Attractions —
Playgrounds —
Rectangular Fields —
Diamond Fields —
Tennis/Pickleball Courts —
Volleyball Courts —
Water Play —
Facilities
Dog Parks —
Individual Picnic/Sitting Areas —
Group Picnic Areas —
Park Shelters —
Outdoor Event Spaces —
Restrooms —
SUMMARY OF TYPICAL AMENITIES BY
CLASSIFICATION
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 157
AMENITIES COMMUNITY CENTERS NEIGHBOR- HOOD CENTERS
INDOOR/OUTDOOR SPORTS COMPLEXES
COURT/FIELD CLUSTERS SPECIAL USE FACILITIES
Passive Recreation
Multi-Purpose Meeting Rooms —
Performance Spaces —
Crafting/Maker Spaces —
Passive Recreation
Gymnasium —
Weight/Cardio Rooms —
Indoor Track —
Indoor Pool/Aquatics —
Rectangular Fields —
Diamond Fields —
Tennis Courts —
Volleyball Courts —
Passive Recreation
Spectator Seating —
Concessions / Catering Kitchen —
Snacks —
158 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
GUIDELINE COMM- UNITY PARKS
SCHOOL- SIDE PARKS
NEIGH-
BORHOOD
PARKS
URBAN PARKS PLAZAS MINI PARKS
SPECIAL USE PARKS
Design
Systemwide Design Language —
Design Vocabulary —
Context
Mixed-Use —
Building Frontage/Entrances —
Streetscape Enhancements —
Access and Connectivity
Seamless Public Space —
Street Grid Connectivity —
Safe Pedestrian Access —
Major Trail Connections —
Trail Mode Separation —
Bike Connections —
Transit Connections —
Shared Parking —
Visible Frontage —
Wayfinding
Gateways —
Path Hierarchy —
Support Facilities —
Zones
Intensive Use Areas —
Programmable Gathering Spaces —
Recreation Areas —
Casual Use Spaces —
Natural System Areas —
Floodplains —
Features
Loop Trail —
Identity Features —
Natural or Historic Features —
SUMMARY OF DESIGN GUIDELINES BY
CLASSIFICATION
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 159
GUIDELINE COMMUNITY CENTERS
NEIGH- BORHOOD CENTERS
INDOOR/OUT-DOOR SPORTS COMPLEXES
COURT/FIELD CLUSTERS SPECIAL USE FACILITIES
Design
Systemwide Design Language
Design Vocabulary
Context
Mixed-Use —
Building Frontage/Entrances —
Streetscape Enhancements —
Access and Connectivity
Seamless Public Space —
Street Grid Connectivity —
Safe Pedestrian Access —
Major Trail Connections —
Trail Mode Separation —
Bike Connections —
Transit Connections —
Shared Parking —
Visible Frontage —
Wayfinding
Gateways —
Path Hierarchy —
Support Facilities —
Zones
Intensive Use Areas —
Programmable Gathering Spaces —
Recreation Areas —
Casual Use Spaces —
Natural System Areas —
Floodplains —
Features
Loop Trail —
Identity Features —
Natural or Historic Features —
160 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 161
LEVEL OF
SERVICE
The City of Fort Collins has a robust, distributed public
space system that seeks to provide residents with
convenient access to amenities and services. However,
different parts of the city have different levels of access
to recreational amenities. For example, residents in
downtown Fort Collins can walk to several rectangular
sports fields in under 10 minutes, while residents in
Northeast Fort Collins, an area expected to grow rapidly,
are well outside of walking distance to a rectangular
field.
No uniform level of service standards exists for parks
or recreational amenities across the country. There are
generally two types of standards that communities use
to analyze service: population-based standards and
access standards. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan
defines both population-based and access standards by
amenity.
Playgrounds should be within a 10-minute walk
of most Fort Collins residents.
Fossil Creek Park
162 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
SETTING AND USING LEVEL
OF SERVICE STANDARDS
Level of service standards help guide decisions about how many
recreational amenities are needed and where. Population-based
standards address how many amenities are needed and access-
based standards address where amenities are needed, both now and
in the future.
Using the level of service standards to increase access to recreational
amenities could result in different types of actions:
• In areas where sidewalk and trail connections are lacking for
pedestrians, or where roads are disconnected for drivers,
increased access could mean adding sidewalks, trails, or road
segments to better connect residents to existing amenities.
• In areas where there is access to school district amenities but
not to City-owned amenities, increased access could mean
formalizing a partnership agreement to ensure that school
district amenities are always open and available to the public.
• In areas with a high population density that do not have access
to school or City amenities, increased access could mean
building new amenities in new or refreshed parks.
• In growing areas, where developers may provide new public
spaces, increased access could mean working with developers
during the development review process to provide needed
amenities.
• In areas with access to multiple amenities in close proximity,
increased access could mean removing or repurposing an
underused amenity.
Used in combination, the population-based and access standards
provide a snapshot of the level of service provided by current public
space amenities and a road map for addressing the number and
location of amenities in the future. The level of service standards
can be used to help prioritize which actions will increase equitable
access to recreational amenities for the most residents.
Not all recreational amenities have level of service standards. Level
of service standards are used for common amenities that have broad
user bases and whose inventories should grow as the population of
the city grows.
Level of service standards can and should change over time as
industry trends change and demographic trends of the community
change. The City will update its inventory of recreation amenities
annually and will reexamine the recommended level of service
standards approximately every five years as the needs assessment is
updated.
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 163
POPULATION-BASED
STANDARDS
Population-based level of service is expressed as a ratio of number
of amenities to population. The current ratio is compared to a
recommended ratio, which indicates whether additional amenities
are needed.
Methodology
A number of data points were considered in setting the
recommended level of service standards:
• current level of service
• level of service peer cities
• national participation trends
• community priorities
Some data supports raising the current level of service. Other data
supports maintaining or lowering the current level of service.
Peer Cities
Through the benchmarking analysis (see p. 336), data was
collected on level of service provided by five peer cities that have
similar demographic or economic characteristics, or have highly
regarded public space systems.
• Aurora, CO
• Boise, ID
• Boulder, CO
• Madison, WI
• Minneapolis, MN
National Participation Trends
National participation trends were taken from the Sports and Fitness
Industry Association’s 2019 Sports, Fitness, and Leisure Activities
Topline Participation Report, which tracks total national participation
in recreational activities over time. While the national trends for
amenities are useful, it is important to keep in mind they include
numbers from localities that have very different demographics from
Fort Collins.
Community Priorities
The statistically valid survey conducted as part of the Parks and
Recreation master planning process in 2019 asked residents whether
they or their households have a need for various outdoor and
indoor amenities, and how well those needs are currently being met.
Combining these metrics into a Priority Investment Rating (PIR), the
survey report indicates the relative priorities for investing in these
amenities.
164 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
ACCESS STANDARDS
Access standards are expressed as a time within which residents
should be able to get to a particular type of amenity by a particular
mode of transportation. Where population-based standards indicate
how many of an amenity is needed, access standards indicate where
new amenities, or better ways of accessing existing amenities, are
needed.
Residents’ expectations of how close recreational amenities should
be to their homes—and the City’s ability to provide those amenities—
vary by type of amenity. People tend to expect some amenities, like
basketball courts or playgrounds, which require little equipment
to use, have broad drop-in usage, and are well used by children,
to be within a close walk of home. For facilities and amenities like
dog parks and community centers, which are used by a subset of
residents or have highly scheduled or programmed usage, residents
are willing to travel a bit further but still want them close by. Both of
these categories of facilities and amenities require access standards.
Other facilities and amenities, particularly those that cater to more
niche user groups, do not require access standards since people are
willing to travel longer distances to use them.
Considering these differences in expectations, the City of Fort
Collins is establishing two tiers of access standards: a 10-minute walk
standard and a 5-minute drive standard,
10-Minute Walk Standard
• Rectangular Fields
• Playgrounds
• Basketball Courts
5-Minute Drive Standard
• Pickleball Courts
• Dog Parks
• Pools
• Community Centers
• Community Gardens
• Diamond Fields
It may also be possible in some cases to increase the level of service
by improving the walkable street and trail network that connect
to existing amenities. In some instances an amenity has a smaller
service area because the sidewalks and trails to get there may not
exist and therefore the amenity’s full service potential is not being
met. These gaps in access are shown as circles, which represent an
idealized service area. An example is shown at the right.
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 165
How the Maps Were Created
A spatial access analysis was performed for certain public space and
school district amenities. To determine what parts of the city meet
and do not meet the recommended access standards, areas were
drawn around each individual amenity (e.g., basketball court) within
which a person could reach that amenity within a specified time by
walking, or driving. These service areas were then overlaid with the
projected population density in 2040. This overlay analysis reveals
parts of the city with gaps in access. These access maps follow.
The access maps are a planning tool to evaluate access across
the City to certain recreational amenities and highlight general
areas where access to amenities could be improved. Improved
access could mean adding new linkages to the travel network, like
constructing more sidewalks, or adding another amenity in the
general area identified as having limited access.
The access maps were created using geographic information
systems (GIS) software, multiple travel networks, and 2040
population projections. Travel time for each individual amenity (e.g.,
basketball courts) was calculated using the City’s walking, and
driving networks, assuming minimal traffic.H O R S E T O O T H R E S E V O I R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
Example of areas within 10-minute walk
from park amenities (light green) and school
amenities (peach), compared to an idealized
10-minute walk radius.
Level of Service Analysis
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
New Park in Progress
Planned School
Population Density
2040
CSU Campus
Idealized 10-Minute Walk
Park Amenity
Existing 10-Minute Walk
Idealized 10-Minute Walk
School Amenity
Existing 10-Minute Walk
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 173
Service Gap/ New Amenity
Focus Area
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled
by Securing Access to Existing
School Amenity
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled by
New Amenity in Planned Park
172 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Basketball Courts — Access Standard — 10 Minute Walk
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
BASKETBALL HOOPS
Population-Based Standard
31
+8.0%
Madison 10.6
MinneapolisFort Collins 2.5
1.6Aurora2.2Boise/Boulder
3.5
0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Current LOS
3.7
per 10,000
Recommended LOS
3.0
per 10,000
Number of Courts
64
in 2020
+8
by 2040
Considerations
200
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
DRAFTDRAFT
166 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
HOW TO READ THE LEVEL
OF SERVICE STANDARDS
Population-Based Standards
This digram shows how the recommended
level of service (LOS) visually relates to the
current level of service.
These numbers indicate the current number
of amenities and the number to be added by
2040.
These charts show the data that was used
to build the recommended LOS. These data
points are the peer median level of service,
the priority investment rating, and the
5-year participation change.
This legend shows how the above data
points inform the recommended LOS. For
example if the peer median LOS is greater
than Fort Collins, it suggests raising the LOS.
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
New Park in Progress
Planned School
Population Density
2040
CSU Campus
Idealized 10-Minute Walk
Park Amenity
Existing 10-Minute Walk
Idealized 10-Minute Walk
School Amenity
Existing 10-Minute Walk
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 173
Service Gap/ New Amenity
Focus Area
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled
by Securing Access to Existing
School Amenity
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled by
New Amenity in Planned Park
172 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Basketball Courts — Access Standard — 10 Minute Walk
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
BASKETBALL HOOPS
Population-Based Standard
31
+8.0%
Madison 10.6
MinneapolisFort Collins 2.5
1.6Aurora2.2Boise/Boulder
3.5
0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Current LOS
3.7
per 10,000
Recommended LOS
3.0
per 10,000
Number of Courts
64
in 2020
+8
by 2040
Considerations
200
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
DRAFTDRAFT
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 167
Access Standards
The current amenity access standards are
represented by the green walksheds on
the maps. The dark blue circles show an
ideal walkshed that could be achieved with
enhanced street walkability. See diagram
below.
The orange and black circles on the map
show where a new amenity could be located
in order to close a gap in the existing access
standards. Dashed circles are new amenities
that have not been planned, solid circles
show that a park is planned in this area,
and orange circles show that the gap could
be filled by sharing amenity access with a
school.
Existing LOS
Idealized LOS
trail
streets with
sidewalks
streets without
sidewalks
Amenity
168 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
RECTANGULAR FIELDS
Population-Based Standard
-2 .4%
Minneapolis 9.5
Boulder 3.5
MadisonFort Collins 3.32.5
Aurora 4 .6Boise5.1
0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Current LOS
2 .9
per 10,000
Recommended LOS
2 .5
per 10,000
Number of Fields
50
in 2020
+11
by 2040
Considerations
200
53
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
New Park in Progress
Planned School
Population Density
2040
CSU Campus
Idealized 10-Minute Walk
Park Amenity
Existing 10-Minute Walk
Idealized 10-Minute Walk
School Amenity
Existing 10-Minute Walk
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 169
Service Gap/ New Amenity
Focus Area
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled
by Securing Access to Existing
School Amenity
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled by
New Amenity in Planned Park
Rectangular Fields — Access Standard — 10-Minute Walk
0 1/2 1 2
Miles I-25
170 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
PLAYGROUNDS
Population-Based Standard
65
N/A
Madison 7.0
Boulder
3.4
Minneapolis
Fort Collins 2.52.2Aurora
3 .8
Boise
4.1
0
0
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Current LOS
2 .5
per 10,000
Recommended LOS
3 .0
per 10,000
Number of Playgrounds
44
in 2020
+28
by 2040
Considerations
200
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
New Park in Progress
Planned School
Population Density
2040
CSU Campus
Idealized 10-Minute Walk
Park Amenity
Existing 10-Minute Walk
Idealized 10-Minute Walk
School Amenity
Existing 10-Minute Walk
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 171
Service Gap/ New Amenity
Focus Area
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled
by Securing Access to Existing
School Amenity
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled by
New Amenity in Planned Park
Playgrounds — Access Standard — 10-Minute Walk
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
172 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
BASKETBALL HOOPS
Population-Based Standard
31
+8 .0%
Madison 10.6
Minneapolis
Fort Collins 2.5
1.6Aurora2 .2Boise/Boulder
3.5
0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Current LOS
3 .7
per 10,000
Recommended LOS
3 .0
per 10,000
Number of Courts
64
in 2020
+8
by 2040
Considerations
200
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
New Park in Progress
Planned School
Population Density
2040
CSU Campus
Idealized 10-Minute Walk
Park Amenity
Existing 10-Minute Walk
Idealized 10-Minute Walk
School Amenity
Existing 10-Minute Walk
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 173
Service Gap/ New Amenity
Focus Area
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled
by Securing Access to Existing
School Amenity
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled by
New Amenity in Planned Park
Basketball Courts — Access Standard — 10-Minute Walk
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
174 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
PICKLEBALL COURTS
Population-Based Standard
65
Madison 2.0
Boulder 0.4
Minneapolis
Fort Collins
0
0.9
0.9
Aurora 0 .6
Boise 0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Current LOS
0 .9
per 10,000
Recommended LOS
1 .7
per 10,000
Number of Courts
8
in 2020
+13
by 2040
Considerations
+40 .5%
200
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
New Park in Progress
Planned School
Population Density
2040
CSU Campus
Idealized 5-Minute Drive
Park Amenity
Existing 5-Minute Drive
Service Gap/ New Amenity
Focus Area
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled by
New Amenity in Planned Park
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 175
Pickleball Courts — Access Standard — 5-Minute Drive
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
176 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
200
DOG PARKS
Population-Based Standard
120
Boulder 7.3
Madison
1.1
Minneapolis
Fort Collins
5.7
2.3
1.7
Aurora
3 .9
Boise
0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Number of Dog Parks
4
in 2020
+5
by 2040
Considerations
N/A
Recommended LOS
4 .0
per 100,000
Current LOS
2 .3
per 100,000
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
New Park in Progress
Planned School
Population Density
2040
CSU Campus
Idealized 5-Minute Drive
Park Amenity
Existing 5-Minute Drive
Service Gap/ New Amenity
Focus Area
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled by
New Amenity in Planned Park
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 177
Dog Parks — Access Standard — 5-Minute Drive
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
178 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
POOLS
Population-Based Standard
197Boulder4.6
Madison 0.4
Minneapolis
Fort Collins
3.1
2.3
1.0
Aurora 2 .4
Boise
0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Number of Pools
4
in 2020
+2
by 2040
Considerations
+10 .8%
Recommended LOS
2 .4
per 100,000
Current LOS
2 .3
per 100,000
200
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
New Park in Progress
Planned School
Population Density
2040
CSU Campus
Idealized 5-Minute Drive
Park Amenity
Existing 5-Minute Drive
Service Gap/ New Amenity
Focus Area
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled by
New Amenity in Planned Park
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 179
Pools — Access Standard — 5-Minute Drive
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
180 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
COMMUNITY CENTERS
Population-Based Standard
N/A
Minneapolis 2.3
Madison 0.1
BoulderFort Collins
1.0
0.3Aurora
0 .5
Boise
0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Number of Centers
4
in 2020
+3
by 2040
Considerations
N/A
Recommended LOS
0 .6
per 20,000
Current LOS
0 .5
per 20,000
200
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
Future Southeast
Community Center
New Park in Progress
Planned School
Population Density
2040
CSU Campus
Idealized 5-Minute Drive
Park Amenity
Existing 5-Minute Drive
Service Gap/ New Amenity
Focus Area
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled by
New Amenity in Planned Park
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 181
Community Centers — Access Standard — 5-Minute Drive
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
182 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
COMMUNITY GARDEN PLOTS
Population-Based Standard
120
Madison 3.2
Minneapolis 0
Boulder
Fort Collins
0.2
0.9
2.6
Aurora
0 .7Boise
0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Number of Plots
158
in 2020
+109
by 2040
Considerations
N/A
Recommended LOS
1 .1
per 1,000
Current LOS
0 .9
per 1,000
200
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
New Park in Progress
Planned School
Population Density
2040
CSU Campus
Idealized 5-Minute Drive
Park Amenity
Existing 5-Minute Drive
Service Gap/ New Amenity
Focus Area
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled by
New Amenity in Planned Park
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 183
Community Gardens — Access Standard — 5-Minute Drive
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
184 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
DIAMOND FIELDS
Population-Based Standard
33
Minneapolis 4.6
Madison 0.9
Boulder
Fort Collins
1.2
2.1
3.1
Aurora
2 .2Boise
0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Number of Fields
37
in 2020
+15
by 2040
Considerations
+12 .0%
Recommended LOS
2 .1
per 10,000
Current LOS
2 .1
per 10,000
200
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
New Park in Progress
Planned School
Population Density
2040
CSU Campus
Idealized 5-Minute Drive
Park Amenity
Existing 5-Minute Drive
Service Gap/ New Amenity
Focus Area
Service Gap/ Potentially Filled by
New Amenity in Planned Park
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 185
Diamond Fields — Access Standard — 5-Minute Drive
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
186 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
BMX COURSES
Population-Based Standard
50
Fort Collins 1.7
Aurora
Boulder
Boise 0.4
0.9
Minneapolis 0Madison 0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Number of Courses
3
in 2020
+2
by 2040
Considerations
+55 .2%
Recommended LOS
2 .0
per 100,000
Current LOS
1 .7
per 100,000
200
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 187
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
VOLLEYBALL COURTS
Population-Based Standard
36
N/A
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Number of Courts
7
in 2020
+2
by 2040
Considerations
-0 .5%
Recommended LOS
4 .0
per 100,000
Current LOS
4 .0
per 100,000
200
0
188 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
LIGHTED FIELDS
Population-Based Standard
N/A
Minneapolis 53.8
Aurora
MadisonBoulder 13.5
0
8.0Fort Collins 10 .9
Boise 0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Number of Fields
14
in 2020
+5
by 2040
Considerations
N/A
Recommended LOS
8 .0
per 100,000
Current LOS
8 .0
per 100,000
200
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 189
PAVED, MULTI-USE TRAILS
Population-Based Standard
157
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Number of Miles
44
in 2020
+28
by 2040
Considerations
-1 .7%
Recommended LOS
30 .0
per 100,000
Current LOS
25 .2
per 100,000
200
0
Boulder 52.1
Madison 25.9
Minneapolis
25.6
25.2
46.2
Aurora
33 .8Boise
Fort Collins
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
190 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
SKATE PARKS
Population-Based Standard
31
Fort Collins 3.4
AuroraMadison
Boulder
Boise 1.3
1.4
0.50.4
Minneapolis
0 .9
0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Number of Skate Parks
6
in 2020
+1
by 2040
Considerations
+0 .4%
Recommended LOS
3 .0
per 100,000
Current LOS
3 .4
per 100,000
200
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 191
DISC GOLF COURSES
Population-Based Standard
N/A
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Number of Courts
2
in 2020
+1
by 2040
Considerations
N/A
Recommended LOS
1 .4
per 100,000
Current LOS
1 .1
per 100,000
200
0
Boulder 1.8
Madison
Fort Collins
1.5
Minneapolis
0.5
1.1
0.4
Aurora
0 .7
Boise
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
192 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
TENNIS COURTS
Population-Based Standard
51
Fort Collins 2.6
Aurora
Boulder
3.6
1.3
4.6
Boise
3 .3Minneapolis
0
0
Peer Median Priority Investment Rating 5-Year Change in Participation
Number of Courts
46
in 2020
+17
by 2040
Considerations
-1 .2%
Recommended LOS
2 .6
per 10,000
Current LOS
2 .6
per 10,000
200
Madison
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 193
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
194 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Focus Area Overlay
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
The map above is an overlay of the new amenity focus areas from both the walking and driving access standards
maps. By overlaying these focus areas, several patterns emerge. First, the location of the proposed community
parks in both the northeast and east parts of the city are appropriately located and will provide amenities to parts
of the city that will grow significantly over the next twenty years. The other pattern that emerges is that a need for
a new park or parks exists in the southern part of the city. Based on the level of service analysis and the focus area
overlay the Parks and Recreation Master Plan recommends building 12 new parks and completing 7 of the parks that
are currently planned. The recommended parks fill in gaps in the service areas and provide amenities to residents
who currently have to travel to reach them. The recommended parks should be built and classified based on their
surroundings and amenities.
H O R S E T O O T H
R
E
S
E
V
O
I
R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 195
RProposed Park, Land Acquired
Recommended Future Park/Facility Sites
0 1 2
Miles
Proposed ParksProposed Park, Land Not Acquired
Recommended Community/Neighborhood Centers
0 1 2
Miles
Eastridge Park
NE Community Park
Fossil Lake Park
R
R
R
Elizabeth Street Park
Poudre Plains Park
Old Town Park
Shields Park
Sunflower Park
Morningside Park
Heron Park
Wheaton Park
Parkwood Park
Interstate Park
Richards Lake ParkRichards Lake Park
Bucking Horse ParkBucking Horse Park
E Community ParkE Community Park
Trailhead ParkTrailhead ParkIronhorse ParkIronhorse ParkLegacy ParkLegacy Park
Bacon ParkBacon Park
196 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS SUMMARY
supports raising the LOS standard Peer Median
> Fort Collins PIR > 100 Participation
Change > 0
supports maintaining the LOS standard Peer Median
= Fort Collins
PIR ≤ 100
PIR > 50
Participation
Change = 0
supports lowering the LOS standard Peer Median
< Fort Collins PIR ≤ 50 Participation
Change < 0
no information available
ADDITIONAL AMENITIES NEEDED TO
MEET RECOMMENDED LOS STANDARD
AMENITY COUNT METRIC CURRENT LOS
PEER MEDIAN LOS
SURVEY PRIORITY
NATIONAL 5-YR PART-ICIPATION TREND
REC . LOS STANDARD IN 2020 BY 2040 ACCESS STANDARD
Rectangular Fields 50 1/10,000 2.9 4.6 53 -2.4%2.5 -6 +11 10-Min Walk
Playgrounds 44 1/10,000 2.5 3.8 65 3.0 +8 +28 10-Min Walk
Basketball Hoops 64 1/10,000 3.7 2.2 31 +8.0%3.0 -12 +8 10-Min Walk
Pickleball Courts 8 1/20,000 0.9 0.6 65 +40.5%1.7 +7 +13 5-Min Drive
Dog Parks 4 1/100,000 2.3 3.9 120 4.0 +3 +5 5-Min Drive
Swimming Pools 4 1/100,000 2.3 2.4 197 +10.8%2.4 0 +2 5-Min Drive
Recreation
& Senior Centers 4 1/20,000 0.5 0.7 0.6 +1 +3 5-Min Drive
Community Garden Plots 158 1/1,000 0.9 0.7 120 1.1 +34 +109 5-Min Drive
Diamond Fields 37 1/10,000 2.1 2.2 33 +12%2.1 0 +15 5-Min Drive
BMX Courses 3 1/100,000 1.7 0 50 +55.2%2.0 0 +2 NA
Volleyball Courts 7 1/100,000 4.0 36 -0.5%4.0 0 +2 NA
Lighted Fields 14 1/100,000 8.0 11 8.0 0 +5 NA
Paved, Multi-Use Trails
(miles)44 1/100,000 25.2 33.8 157 -1.7%30.0 +8 +28 NA
Skate Parks 6 1/100,000 3.4 0.9 31 +0.4%3.0 -1 +1 NA
Disc Golf Courses 2 1/100,000 1.1 0.7 1.4 0 +1 NA
Tennis Courts 46 1/10,000 2.6 3.3 51 -1.2%2.6 -1 +17 NA
Guidelines for Parks and Facilities / 197
ADDITIONAL AMENITIES NEEDED TO
MEET RECOMMENDED LOS STANDARD
AMENITYCOUNTMETRICCURRENT LOS
PEER MEDIAN LOS
SURVEY PRIORITY
NATIONAL 5-YR PART-ICIPATION TREND
REC . LOS STANDARD IN 2020 BY 2040 ACCESS STANDARD
Rectangular Fields501/10,0002.94.653-2.4%2.5 -6 +11 10-Min Walk
Playgrounds441/10,0002.5 3.8653.0 +8 +28 10-Min Walk
Basketball Hoops641/10,0003.72.231+8.0%3.0 -12 +8 10-Min Walk
Pickleball Courts81/20,0000.90.665+40.5%1.7 +7 +13 5-Min Drive
Dog Parks41/100,0002.33.91204.0 +3 +5 5-Min Drive
Swimming Pools41/100,0002.32.4197+10.8%2.4 0 +2 5-Min Drive
Recreation
& Senior Centers41/20,0000.50.70.6 +1 +3 5-Min Drive
Community Garden Plots1581/1,0000.90.71201.1 +34 +109 5-Min Drive
Diamond Fields371/10,0002.12.233+12%2.1 0 +15 5-Min Drive
BMX Courses31/100,0001.7050+55.2%2.0 0 +2 NA
Volleyball Courts71/100,0004.036-0.5%4.0 0 +2 NA
Lighted Fields141/100,0008.0118.0 0 +5 NA
Paved, Multi-Use Trails
(miles)441/100,00025.233.8157-1.7%30.0 +8 +28 NA
Skate Parks61/100,0003.40.931+0.4%3.0 -1 +1 NA
Disc Golf Courses21/100,0001.10.71.4 0 +1 NA
Tennis Courts461/10,0002.63.351-1.2%2.6 -1 +17 NA
GUIDELINES FOR
PROGRAMS
200 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Guidelines for Programs / 201
PROGRAM
AND SERVICE
CLASSIFICATIONS
As with parks and recreation facilities, Fort Collins
has a wide array of programs available to serve
residents' interests and needs. Currently, the Recreation
Department does not classify its programs and services.
Classifying programs and services is an important
process to ensure they remain aligned with interests
and needs, serve the mission of the organization, and
sustainably operate within the bounds of its financial
resources.
Nature programs are some of the highest rated.
Outdoor Recreation Program
202 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
PROGRAM AND SERVICE
CLASSIFICATIONS
Building on industry standard criteria25, programs and services
should be classified by:
• whom the program is targeting
• purpose
• benefits
• cost
• outcome
Program Classifications
The program classification matrix below can be used as a guide
to classifying programs and to inform cost recovery. Programs are
categorized as essential, important, or value-added programs. Fort
Collins' programs are categorized at right.
These classifications distinguish the level of public benefit and
private benefit as they apply to each program area. Public benefit
means that everyone receives the same level of benefit with equal
access. Private benefit means that the user receives exclusive benefit
above what a general taxpayer receives for their personal benefit.
Cost recovery is typically lower (0–30%) for essential programs,
moderate (30–75%) for important programs and high (over 75%) for
value-added programs.
ESSENTIAL PROGRAMS IMPORTANT PROGRAMS VALUE-ADDED PROGRAMS
Expectations
Fees/Cost Recovery
Benefit
Market Competition
Access
High from Interest GroupsHigh from the Public
Cover Most CostsNone/Minimal
IndividualPublic
Alternate Providers AvailableLimited Other Providers
Limited to UsersOpen to All
Guidelines for Programs / 203
PROGRAMS BENEFIT LEVEL SERVICE CATEGORY TARGET COST RECOVERY
Aquatics
EPIC Pool Community/Individual Important 60%
EPIC Aquafitness Community Essential 30%
MP Pool Community/Individual Important 50%
MP Aquafitness Community/Individual Important 50%
Cp Pool Community/Individual Important 65%
SC Pool Community Essential 35%
SC Aquatics Community/Individual Important 50%
Ice
EPIC Ice Community/Individual Important 60%
Old Town Square Holiday Rink Community/Individual Important 50%
Youth Enrichment Programs
Child Development Community/Individual Important 50%
The Farm Community/Individual Important 60%
Youth & Camps Community/Individual Important 50%
Adult Enrichment Programs
Social Opportunities Community/Individual Important 60%
Education Community/Individual Important 50%
Wellness Community/Individual Important 50%
Dance Community/Individual Important 50%
Trips & Travel Community/Individual Important 50%
Outdoor Recreation Community/Individual Important 50%
Arts, Crafts, Pottery - Youth and Adult
Arts & Crafts Community/Individual Important 60%
Pottery Community/Individual Important 50%
Adaptive Recreational Opportunities
All Programs Community/Individual Important 50%
Fitness Programs
NACC Individual Value Added 75%
FAC Individual Value Added 75%
SC Individual Value Added 75%
Sports
Adult Individual Value Added 80%
Youth Community/Individual Important 60%
Tennis Individual Value Added 80%
Special Events
Kids in the Park Community/Individual Important 65%
4th of July Parade Community/Individual Important 50%
Room Rentals
NACC Individual Value Added 100%
EPIC Individual Value Added 100%
FAC Individual Value Added 100%
SC Individual Value Added 100%
Club Tico Individual Value Added 100%
204 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Guidelines for Programs / 205
PROGRAM COSTS
AND PRICING
Cost of service analyses help determine what financial
resources are required to provide specific programs at
specific levels of service. Results are used to determine
and track cost recovery as well as to benchmark
different programs. Once cost of service totals have
been calculated, cost recovery goals can be established.
A cost of service analysis should be undertaken on a
regular basis.
Aquatic facilities draw many residents on hot
summer days.
City Park Pool
206 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
COST OF SERVICE
Cost of service accurately calculates direct costs (i.e. program-
specific costs) and indirect costs (i.e. comprehensive costs, including
administrative overhead costs). A cost of service analysis for each
program or program type not only helps determine the true and full
cost of offering a program but provides information that can be used
to price programs based on accurate delivery costs. Common types
of costs that must be accounted for in a cost of service analysis
include:
• personnel costs
• administrative cost allocation
• debt service costs
• supply and material costs
• equipment costs
• contracted services
• vehicle costs
• building costs
A cost of service analysis must also include the total revenue earned
for that activity.
Costs (and revenue) can also be derived on a per unit basis. Program
or activity units may include:
• number of participants
• number of tasks performed
• number of consumable units
• number of service calls
• number of events
• required time for offering program/service
The table at right summarizes current cost recovery, targeted cost
recovery, and the increase in net revenue for each program if the
targets were achieved.
PROGRAMS 2019 PARTICIPATION COUNTS
TOTAL REVENUE DIRECT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES
INDIRECT/ ADMIN/ OVERHEAD EXPENDITURES
TOTAL REVENUE OVER/UNDER TOTAL
TAX SUPPORT PER PARTICIPANT/ VISITOR
CURRENT COST RECOVERY BENEFIT LEVEL SERVICE CATEGORY TARGET COST RECOVERY
POTENTIAL NET REVENUE INCREASE
Aquatics
EPIC Pool 163,876 $433,699 $267,646 $549,495 ($383,442)($2.34)531.%Community/
Individual
Important 60%$56,586
EPIC Aquafitness 4,885 $3,499 $8,668 $4,421 ($9,600)($1.97)26.7%Community Essential 30%$438
MP Pool 46,867 $237,593 $189,529 $301,030 ($252,966)($5.40)48.4%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$7,686
MP Aquafitness 3,486 $3,513 $5,269 $4,451 ($6,207)($1.78)36.1%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$1,347
Cp Pool 58,508 $251,503 $94,232 $318,653 ($161,382)($2.76)60.9%Community/
Individual
Important 65%$16,873
SC Pool 4,411 $24,742 $115,136 $31,348 ($121,742)($27.60)16.9%Community Essential 35%$26,527
SC Aquatics 26,601 $34,975 $32,755 $44,313 ($42,093)($1.58)45.4%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$3,559
Ice
EPIC Ice 144,790 $1,205,326 $515,999 $1,527,144 ($837,817)($5.79)59.0%Community/
Individual
Important 60%$20,560
Old Town Square
Holiday Rink
1,600 $4,988 $3,608 $6,320 ($4,940)($3.09)50.2%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$0
Youth Enrichment Programs
Child Development 24,812 $266,500 $213,591 $337,655 ($284,746)($11.48)48.3%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$9,123
The Farm 64,519 $351,724 $136,881 $445,633 ($230,790)($3.58)60.4%Community/
Individual
Important 60%$0
Youth & Camps 18,803 $382,435 $295,225 $484,544 ($397,334)($21.13)49.0%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$7,449
Adult Enrichment Programs
Social
Opportunities
24,311 $80,937 $43,388 $102,547 ($64,998)($2.67)55.5%Community/
Individual
Important 60%$6,624
Education 4,260 $41,845 $40,083 $53,017 ($51,255)($12.03)44.9%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$4,705
Wellness 4,352 $34,949 $29,987 $44,280 ($39,318)($9.03)47.1%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$2,185
Dance 2,581 $17,724 $16,205 $22,456 ($20,937)($8.11)45.8%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$1,607
Trips & Travel 2,297 $321,399 $328,407 $407,211 ($414,219)($180.33)43.7%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$46,410
Outdoor
Recreation
1,790 $30,311 $31,796 $38,404 ($39,889)($22.41)43.2%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$4,789
Arts, Crafts, Pottery - Youth and Adult
Arts & Crafts 5,052 $53,326 $28,670 $67,564 ($42,908)($8.49)55.4%Community/
Individual
Important 60%$4,414
Pottery 15,481 $159,570 $114,512 $202,175 ($157,117)($10.15)50.4%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$0
Adaptive Recreational Opportunities
All Programs 15,299 $53,738 $67,125 $68,086 ($81,473)($5.33)39.7%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$13,867
Fitness Programs
NACC 129,322 $131,876 $120,937 $167,086 ($156,147)($1.21)45.8%Individual Value Added 75%$84,142
FAC 47,862 $50,372 $47,292 $63,821 ($60,741)($1.27)45.3%Individual Value Added 75%$32,963
SC 183,590 $299,372 $129,813 $379,303 ($209,744)($1.14)58.8%Individual Value Added 75%$82,463
Sports
Adult 79,404 $327,396 $232,184 $414,810 ($319,598)($4.02)50.6%Individual Value Added 80%$190,199
Youth 85,832 $490,615 $266,894 $621,608 ($397,887)($4.64)55.2%Community/
Individual
Important 60%$220,186
Tennis 3,472 $7,773 $105 $9,848 ($2,180)($0.63)78.1%Individual Value Added 80%$190
Special Events
Kids in the Park NA $17,200 $5,300 $21,792 ($9,892)NA 63.5%Community/
Individual
Important 65%$410
4th of July Parade NA $2,550 $2,000 $3,231 ($2,681)NA 48.7%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$589
Room Rentals
NACC NA $81,839 $3,805 $103,690 ($25,656)NA 76.1%Individual Value Added 100%$25,656
EPIC NA $1,193 $0 $1,512 ($319)NA 78.9%Individual Value Added 100%$319
FAC NA $4,418 $0 $5,598 ($1,180)NA 78.9%Individual Value Added 100%$1,180
SC NA $131,612 $96,227 $166,752 ($131,367)NA 50.0%Individual Value Added 100%$131,367
Club Tico NA $40,285 $16,832 $31,041 ($27,588)NA 59.4%Individual Value Added 100%$27,588
Guidelines for Programs / 207
PROGRAMS2019 PARTICIPATION COUNTS
TOTAL REVENUE DIRECT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES
INDIRECT/ ADMIN/ OVERHEAD EXPENDITURES
TOTAL REVENUE OVER/UNDER TOTAL
TAX SUPPORT PER PARTICIPANT/ VISITOR
CURRENT COST RECOVERY BENEFIT LEVEL SERVICE CATEGORY TARGET COST RECOVERY
POTENTIAL NET REVENUE INCREASE
Aquatics
EPIC Pool163,876 $433,699 $267,646 $549,495 ($383,442)($2.34)531.%Community/
Individual
Important 60%$56,586
EPIC Aquafitness4,885 $3,499 $8,668 $4,421 ($9,600)($1.97)26.7%Community Essential 30%$438
MP Pool46,867 $237,593 $189,529 $301,030 ($252,966)($5.40)48.4%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$7,686
MP Aquafitness3,486 $3,513 $5,269 $4,451 ($6,207)($1.78)36.1%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$1,347
Cp Pool58,508 $251,503 $94,232 $318,653 ($161,382)($2.76)60.9%Community/
Individual
Important 65%$16,873
SC Pool4,411 $24,742 $115,136 $31,348 ($121,742)($27.60)16.9%Community Essential 35%$26,527
SC Aquatics26,601 $34,975 $32,755 $44,313 ($42,093)($1.58)45.4%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$3,559
Ice
EPIC Ice144,790 $1,205,326 $515,999 $1,527,144 ($837,817)($5.79)59.0%Community/
Individual
Important 60%$20,560
Old Town Square
Holiday Rink
1,600 $4,988 $3,608 $6,320 ($4,940)($3.09)50.2%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$0
Youth Enrichment Programs
Child Development24,812 $266,500 $213,591 $337,655 ($284,746)($11.48)48.3%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$9,123
The Farm64,519 $351,724 $136,881 $445,633 ($230,790)($3.58)60.4%Community/
Individual
Important 60%$0
Youth & Camps18,803 $382,435 $295,225 $484,544 ($397,334)($21.13)49.0%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$7,449
Adult Enrichment Programs
Social
Opportunities
24,311 $80,937 $43,388 $102,547 ($64,998)($2.67)55.5%Community/
Individual
Important 60%$6,624
Education4,260 $41,845 $40,083 $53,017 ($51,255)($12.03)44.9%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$4,705
Wellness4,352 $34,949 $29,987 $44,280 ($39,318)($9.03)47.1%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$2,185
Dance2,581 $17,724 $16,205 $22,456 ($20,937)($8.11)45.8%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$1,607
Trips & Travel2,297 $321,399 $328,407 $407,211 ($414,219)($180.33)43.7%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$46,410
Outdoor
Recreation
1,790 $30,311 $31,796 $38,404 ($39,889)($22.41)43.2%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$4,789
Arts, Crafts, Pottery - Youth and Adult
Arts & Crafts5,052 $53,326 $28,670 $67,564 ($42,908)($8.49)55.4%Community/
Individual
Important 60%$4,414
Pottery15,481 $159,570 $114,512 $202,175 ($157,117)($10.15)50.4%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$0
Adaptive Recreational Opportunities
All Programs15,299 $53,738 $67,125 $68,086 ($81,473)($5.33)39.7%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$13,867
Fitness Programs
NACC129,322 $131,876 $120,937 $167,086 ($156,147)($1.21)45.8%Individual Value Added 75%$84,142
FAC47,862 $50,372 $47,292 $63,821 ($60,741)($1.27)45.3%Individual Value Added 75%$32,963
SC183,590 $299,372 $129,813 $379,303 ($209,744)($1.14)58.8%Individual Value Added 75%$82,463
Sports
Adult79,404 $327,396 $232,184 $414,810 ($319,598)($4.02)50.6%Individual Value Added 80%$190,199
Youth85,832 $490,615 $266,894 $621,608 ($397,887)($4.64)55.2%Community/
Individual
Important 60%$220,186
Tennis3,472 $7,773 $105 $9,848 ($2,180)($0.63)78.1%Individual Value Added 80%$190
Special Events
Kids in the ParkNA $17,200 $5,300 $21,792 ($9,892)NA 63.5%Community/
Individual
Important 65%$410
4th of July ParadeNA $2,550 $2,000 $3,231 ($2,681)NA 48.7%Community/
Individual
Important 50%$589
Room Rentals
NACCNA $81,839 $3,805 $103,690 ($25,656)NA 76.1%Individual Value Added 100%$25,656
EPICNA $1,193 $0 $1,512 ($319)NA 78.9%Individual Value Added 100%$319
FACNA $4,418 $0 $5,598 ($1,180)NA 78.9%Individual Value Added 100%$1,180
SCNA $131,612 $96,227 $166,752 ($131,367)NA 50.0%Individual Value Added 100%$131,367
Club TicoNA $40,285 $16,832 $31,041 ($27,588)NA 59.4%Individual Value Added 100%$27,588
208 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
PRICING STRATEGIES
Currently, the Fort Collins Recreation Department utilizes four
pricing strategies:
By Cost Recovery Goals - department cost recovery goals influence
price points
By Customer's Ability to Pay - scholarships, subsidies, discounted
rates offered for low-income residents
Residency - different prices for residents and non-residents
Market Competition - competitors' prices influence price points
The City should consider adding pricing strategies that will not only
increase sales but also maximize the utilization of the City’s parks,
programs, and recreation facilities:
Primetime and Non-Primetime - Prices are set based on time of
day. Primetime is considered to be the time of day in which demand
for the service is highest. Fees for the rental of park facilities during
this time would be set at rate that would recover 125-150% of costs
incurred. To lessen the demand for “primetime,” prices can be
lowered for rentals of facilities during times in which demand is
lower. This will assist in maximizing facility utilization.
Premium Pricing - Prices are set high to reflect the exclusiveness of
the product. For example, a user group might pay higher rental fees
for the exclusive use of a facility that prohibits the general public or
other groups from participating.
Having multiple pricing options gives customers the opportunity
to choose which option best fits their schedule and price point.
Additional pricing strategies to explore include:
• Incentive Pricing
• Length of Stay Pricing
• Season and Off-Season Rates
• Cost Recovery Pricing for All Programs
• Multi-tiered Program Pricing
• Level of Exclusivity Pricing
• Group Discounting and Packaging
• Age Segment Pricing
• Volume Pricing
• Level of Private Gain Pricing
Citywide programs bring all kinds of residents.
Open Streets
Guidelines for Programs / 209
POLICY FRAMEWORK
212 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Policy Framework / 213
POLICY
FRAMEWORK
The path forward for parks and recreation in Fort Collins
is captured within the following goals, actions, and
methods.
Each goal describes an ideal future for the parks and
recreation system. Each goal is supported by a set of
actions that the City can take to move towards that
ideal future. Many of the actions are, in turn, supported
by a set of methods that provide more specific
implementation steps.
New parks bring new experiences to the city.
Poudre River Whitewater park
214 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Policy Framework / 215
1 . PARKS
GOAL
Provide equitable access to parks .
Fort Collins has a substantial network of parks where people can
relax, exercise, socialize, and come together for community events.
A large majority (79%) of survey respondents felt that there are
sufficient public parks, natural areas, and open spaces within walking
distance of their residence. However, as Fort Collins continues to
grow, the City will need to consider how to meet the needs of
existing and new residents. In addition, City Plan elevated Nature in
the City’s goal to increase the number of residents who have access
to natural areas, parks, and/or open space within a 10-minute walk of
their home, reinforcing the need to close existing gaps and provide
nature in areas planned for intensification. As an integral component
of the city’s public space system, providing access to parks is one
way to achieve the City Plan goal.
ACTIONS
• Expand the usability of existing parks.
• Expand existing parks and secure new parkland, where
possible, to serve growing and under-served communities
in established parts of the city.
• Continue to build new parks to serve newly developing
parts of the city.
• Ensure access to spaces that are intentionally designed to
support casual, impromptu use.
• Assess and augment the capacity of downtown parks and
public spaces to accommodate community events and
festivals of various sizes.
Best Practice: Community Gardens
ACQUIRE &
MASTER PLAN
DESIGN
BUILD
OPERATE
EVALUATE
maintainlife cycle replacementminor refreshmajor refreshdivest216 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
1 .1 Expand the usability of existing parks.
Parks, like other built infrastructure, have a life cycle.
Recreational preferences, design preferences, and
neighborhood demographics change over time. Periodically,
parks must be evaluated to determine whether they are
meeting community needs and performing as well as they
could be.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Parks, Planning, Neighborhood
Services, Natural Areas, Utilities, School Districts, Cultural
Resources
1.1.1 Consider potential connections and synergies
of adjacent parks, recreation facilities, natural
areas, stormwater management lands, schools,
trails, and complete streets to maximize user
experience and benefits when developing
corridor, subarea, or redevelopment plans.
1.1.2 Ensure that every park has a framework plan to
identify the intended uses and in what areas of
the park those intended uses are meant to occur.
1.1.3 Comprehensively evaluate the design and
function of parks on a regular basis using
this plan’s design guidelines to determine if
they need to be refreshed. (See p. 105)
1.1.4 Develop master plans for all parks
in need of a major refresh.
1.1.5 Seek opportunities to enlarge or
add space for community gardens
and urban agriculture in parks.
1.1.6 Develop agreements to ensure access
to amenities at adjacent schools.
ACTIONS
Community gardens blends beautiful design and
function.
Twin Silos Garden
Figure 16. The life cycle of a park does not stop
at construction. Parks need to be periodically
evaluated to ensure they stay relevant.
Park Life Cycle
LAUREL ELEMENTARY
Eastside Park
E a s t s i d e P a r kEastside P a r k
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Adjacencies
school
stormwater parcel
natural area
Typical Amenities
x
150
Feet
Acreage: 3.24
Proposed Classification:
Passive Recreation
Seating
Natural Spaces
Casual Use Spaces
Internal Wlaking Trails
Community Gardens
Unique Landscape Features
Biking Trails
Rectangular Fields
Outdoor Fitness
Creative Play Attractions
Playgrounds
Diamond Fields
Water Play
Court Games
Volleyball Courts
Tennis Courts
Basketball Courts
Active Recreation
0
Facilities
Dog Parks
Restrooms
Individual Picninc Areas
Park Shelters
Group Picnic Areas
Outdoor Event Spaces
0
1
0
School Park
1. Hiking Trails
2. Paved Trails
3. Natural Areas
4. Unprogrammed Spaces
5. Dog Parks
Top 5 Amenities in North
East Region
Property to
Purchase
Eastside Park
Laurel
Elementary
Property to
Purchase
Eastside Park
Laurel
Elementary
LAUREL ELEMENTARY
Eastside Park
E a s t s i d e P a r kEastside P a r k
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Adjacencies
school
stormwater parcel
natural area
Typical Amenities
x
150
Feet
Acreage: 3.24
Proposed Classification:
Passive Recreation
Seating
Natural Spaces
Casual Use Spaces
Internal Wlaking Trails
Community Gardens
Unique Landscape Features
Biking Trails
Rectangular Fields
Outdoor Fitness
Creative Play Attractions
Playgrounds
Diamond Fields
Water Play
Court Games
Volleyball Courts
Tennis Courts
Basketball Courts
Active Recreation
0
Facilities
Dog Parks
Restrooms
Individual Picninc Areas
Park Shelters
Group Picnic Areas
Outdoor Event Spaces
0
1
0
School Park
1. Hiking Trails
2. Paved Trails
3. Natural Areas
4. Unprogrammed Spaces
5. Dog Parks
Top 5 Amenities in North
East Region
Property to
Purchase
Eastside Park
Laurel
Elementary
Property to
Purchase
Eastside Park
Laurel
Elementary
RED FOX MEADOWS NATURAL AREA
Avery Park
A v e r y P a r kAvery P a r k
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
Adjacencies
school
x stormwater parcel
natural area
Typical Amenities
300
Feet
Acreage: 6.16
Proposed Classification:
Passive Recreation
Seating
Natural Spaces
Casual Use Spaces
Internal Wlaking Trails
Community Gardens
Unique Landscape Features
Biking Trails
Rectangular Fields
Outdoor Fitness
Creative Play Attractions
Playgrounds
Diamond Fields
Water Play
Court Games
Volleyball Courts
Tennis Courts
Basketball Courts
Active Recreation
0
Facilities
Dog Parks
Restrooms
Individual Picninc Areas
Park Shelters
Group Picnic Areas
Outdoor Event Spaces
0
1
1
Ne ig h bo rhoo d Par k
1. Paved Trails
2. Natural Areas
3. Hiking Trails
4. Unprogrammed Spaces
5. Dog Parks
Top 5 Amenities in North
West Region
Opportunity: Park Expansion
Policy Framework / 217
1 .2 Expand existing parks and secure new
parkland, where possible, to serve
growing and under-served communities
in established parts of the city.
In addition to newly developing parts of the city, Fort Collins
is growing in established parts of the city. Existing parks may
not be sufficient in the future to meet the needs of additional
residents in these areas.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Planning, Utilities, Engineering, FC
Moves
1.2.1 Secure parks and public spaces envisioned
in adopted plans—including the Downtown
Plan, Downtown Civic Center Plan, Midtown
Plan, subarea plans, and corridor plans
—and ensure they provide amenities
that meet neighborhood needs.
1.2.2 Tie parks and recreation facilities proposed in
adopted plans to this plan’s park and recreation
facility classification system. (See p. 115)
1.2.3 Purchase private properties adjacent to
existing parks, when available and cost
effective, to expand existing parks.
1.2.4 Ensure that new parks provided by developers
are accessible, usable, connected to
citywide public space systems, and meet
design and maintenance standards.
1.2.5 Reimagine City-owned stormwater utility
sites as new and expanded public space.
1.2.6 Continue to work with business improvement
districts to provide plazas and urban parks.
Opportunity: Stormwater Utility Sites
PARK STORMWATER
Residents perceive the land across from Avery
Park as part of the park, yet the park has not
been designed with that space in mind.
Avery Park
Eastside Park represents an opportunity where
purchasing adjacent land would greatly improve
the functionality of the park.
Eastside Park
79%
of residents citywide59%
in northeast Fort Collins
feel there are sufficient
parks within walking
distance of home
218 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
1 .3 Continue to build new parks to serve
newly developing parts of the city.
While a large majority (79%) of residents across Fort Collins
said there are sufficient public parks, natural areas, and open
spaces within walking distance of their residence, this was not
uniformly true of all parts of the city. Only 59% of those who
live in still-growing northeast Fort Collins felt the same way.
When built, proposed parks will go a long way toward serving
developing parts of the city.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Parks, Utilities/Stormwater, Natural
Areas, Engineering, Transportation, Planning
1.3.1 Complete community parks that were proposed
in the 2008 Parks and Recreation Policy Plan.
1.3.2 Build additional parks in higher density areas
that are outside a 10-minute walk to parks,
natural areas, and other public spaces.
1 .4 Ensure access to spaces that are
intentionally designed to support casual,
impromptu use.
As Fort Collins continues to grow, pressure will be put on
existing parks to accommodate more users and more uses.
However, it is important to preserve and create spaces that
can be used for relaxation, reflection, and informal activities—
spaces that are open and available, not programmed with
activity. Such spaces were the fourth most important type of
outdoor amenity to residents’ household, behind only trails
and natural or habitat areas.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Parks
1.4.1 Incorporate casual use spaces into park
master plans and framework plans.
Policy Framework / 219Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
RProposed Parks, Land Acquired
Recommended Future Park/Facility Sites
Proposed ParksProposed Parks, Land Not Acquired
Recommended Community/Neighborhood Centers
Eastridge Park
NE Community Park
Fossil Lake Park
R
R
R
Elizabeth Street Park
Poudre Plains Park
Old Town Park
Shields Park
Sunflower Park
Morningside Park
Heron Park
Wheaton Park
Parkwood Park
Interstate Park
Richards Lake ParkRichards Lake Park
Bucking Horse ParkBucking Horse Park
E Community ParkE Community Park
Trailhead ParkTrailhead ParkIronhorse ParkIronhorse ParkLegacy ParkLegacy Park
Bacon ParkBacon Park
220 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
1 .5 Assess and augment the capacity of
downtown parks and public spaces to
accommodate community events and
festivals of various sizes.
With festivals and special events regularly dotting the public
calendar, these activities have become part of the culture of
Fort Collins. It is no wonder, then, that residents identified
festivals and special events as the fourth most important type
of program or activity to their households. As attendance
grows, current event spaces like Civic Center Park are unable
to accommodate the crowds. Downtown continues to be a
preferred location for events due to synergies with restaurants
and retail, multi-modal access, and a central location.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Neighborhood Services,
Downtown Development Authority
1.5.1 Expand the use of festival streets and
temporary street closures during events
to provide flex space for crowds.
1.5.2 Refresh Civic Center and Washington
Parks to make them more useful and
accommodating to downtown events
1.5.3 Examine the potential of parks near downtown,
such as Lee Martinez Community Park, Old Fort
Collins Heritage Park, or Legacy Park, and the
future civic campus to function as festival and
event spaces while staying true to the objectives
of the Poudre River Downtown Master Plan.
1.5.4 Consider the addition of an indoor/outdoor
venue to host larger events, offer recreation
opportunities, and increase economic health.
Street closures can be used to temporarily
expand park space for events and festivals.
Fort Collins Brewery Event
Photo: Visit Fort Collins
Policy Framework / 221
222 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Policy Framework / 223
GOAL
Provide equitable access to recreational
experiences .
Fort Collins offers a wide array of programs in its parks and
recreation facilities. While program participation is high, it is
highest in parts of the city that are closest to the Northside Aztlan
Community Center and Fort Collins Senior Center (above 60%) and
lower in other parts of the city (under 60%). Recreation preferences
are not the same for everybody, and trends continually change.
The City must keep an eye on local and national trends to ensure
that recreation facilities and programs offered continue to respond
to residents’ needs. Residents indicated that aquatic facilities and
programs as well as exercise and fitness facilities and programs were
very important to their households.
ACTIONS
• Provide recreational amenities according to level of
service standards.
• Expand year-round usability of existing recreation
facilities.
• Strive for universal access.
• Ensure facilities and programs continue to respond to
changing user needs.
• Promote public health and wellness through public spaces
programming.
2 . RECREATION
Gymnasiums
Lap Pool
Innovation Rooms
Leisure Pool
17%
33%
21%
23%
19%
21%
Fitness Rooms
Weight Area
“Reduced fee program is great!
Thanks for making it even
easier!”
- Lincoln Center Open House
Attendee
224 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
2 .1 Provide recreational amenities according
to level of service standards. (See p.
161)
Population-based and access standards for level of service
can be used together as a tool to understand how many of
a particular amenity is needed in Fort Collins and where. The
periodic evaluation of park and recreation facility performance
provides an opportunity to determine how well current
amenities, and access to them, relate to defined standards and
residents’ needs.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
(outdoor facilities), Recreation (indoor facilities)
Implementation Partners: Parks
2.1.1 Construct the new southeast recreation
center and consider two other community
or neighborhood centers to serve the
community’s indoor recreation needs.
2.1.2 Identify opportunities during the periodic
evaluation of parks to add or change recreation
amenities or to enhance access based on
citywide needs and resident input.
2.1.3 Consider national and regional recreation
trends, local demand, and projected usage
and participation before introducing new
and innovative amenities. (See p. 37)
2.1.4 Based on level of service, determine
where to reduce duplication of services
without reducing the overall quality of
service provided to the community.
2.1.5 Site new amenities in locations that are
or will be made accessible by as many
modes of transportation as possible.
2.1.6 Consider renaming the Fort Collins Senior Center
to more accurately reflect its role as a community
center that—while primarily focused on those
50 years of age and older—provides a range of
facilities and programming available to all adults.
ACTIONS
Source: Fort Collins Southeast Community Recreation
& Arts Center
Figure 17. Innovation rooms ranked at the top
of what residents want in a new recreation
center.
Top Amenities for a new southeast recreation center
2019 Sports Facility
Market and Feasibility
Analysis
The 2019 Sports Facility Market and
Feasibility Analysis concluded that
there was demand in the market for
one of two development scenarios for a
sports complex:
• a new, indoor sports facility with
8 regulation basketball courts
and 16 volleyball courts that
could accommodate mid-week
demand driven by local groups
and host basketball tournaments,
volleyball, wrestling, and other
flat-floor sports (and non-sports)
events during the off-season for
area hoteliers
or
• a new, 16-diamond synthetic
turf outdoor sports facility with
multipurpose field overlays that
could host major regional and
national baseball and softball
tournaments, driven in part by
demand generated by Triple
Crown
This plan recommends the first option
because of its focus on meeting local
needs.
4,094
Reduced Fee Passes
issued
Policy Framework / 225
2 .2 Expand year-round usability of existing
recreation facilities.
Changes in daylight hours and temperatures affect the
usability of some outdoor recreation facilities over the
course of the year. This has the dual effect of suppressing
participation in colder months and putting greater pressure
on facilities in warmer months. Expanding year-round usability
could help distribute these waves of usage and participation.
Implementation Lead: Parks
Implementation Partners: Recreation, Park Planning and
Development
2.2.1 Develop a citywide, objective lighting
policy for parks and recreation facilities.
2.2.2 Consider the conversion of select existing
fields to synthetic turf to extend usability.
2.2.3 Consider a new indoor event/court
facility to meet local demand and level
of service standards, as proposed in
the 2019 Sports Facility Market and
Feasibility Analysis. (See sidebar.)
2.2.4 Explore opportunities to provide all-season
access to certain high use facilities through the
use of temporary or permanent structures.
2 .3 Strive for universal access.
Through its Adaptive Recreation Opportunities and Reduced
Rate programs, the City offers inclusive, transitional, and
specialized programs that broaden access to recreation.
Continuing this program and continuing to design physical
facilities that are welcoming to all users will move further
towards achieving universal access.
Implementation Lead: Recreation
Implementation Partners: Parks, Park Planning and
Development
2.3.1 Continue the Adaptive Recreation
Opportunities program.
2.3.2 Continue the Reduced Rate program,
and monitor its impact and usage.
2.3.3 Incorporate new and creative recreation facilities
and amenities, such as playgrounds, for universal
access, offering a variety of experiences
where people of all abilities can interact.
2.3.4 Incorporate ADA (Americans with
Disabilities Act) upgrades to existing sites in
accordance with the City's transition plan.
226 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
2 .4 Ensure facilities and programs continue
to respond to changing user needs.
While traditional sports like basketball, golf, tennis, baseball,
and soccer still attract large numbers of participants,
recreational preferences change over time. In the past five
years, for example, pickleball has been one of the fastest
growing sports, with participation up more than 40%. Such
trends have implications for both facilities and programs. A
degree of nimbleness is necessary to prepare for and adjust
to these trends.
Implementation Lead: Recreation
Implementation Partners: Parks, Park Planning and
Development
2.4.1 Continue to monitor regional and national
recreation trends and incorporate new and
innovative recreation facilities and programs to
sustain community participation. (See p. 37)
2.4.2 Evaluate opportunities to repurpose or expand
the range of allowable uses of existing facilities
before building new, specialized facilities.
2.4.3 Promote and broaden the availability of
facilities and programs to cater to diverse
ages, interests, abilities, and cultures.
2.4.4 Regularly evaluate program
demand and adjust offerings.
2.4.5 Implement best practices in program life cycles
to maintain a culture of quality program delivery.
(See"Program Life Cycles" on page 102)
2.4.6 Regularly evaluate each program’s
participation, finances, and outcomes.
2.4.7 Develop a new pricing policy based on
classification of programs and services.
Requests for Amenities and
Facilities
Residents, user groups, and other
organizations often request new amenities
and facilities to meet their needs, as they
also did In the course of developing this
plan. To ensure capital expenditures on such
amenities and facilities are in line with the
policies of this plan, the following guidelines
can be used to evaluate requests.
The amenity or facility will:
• primarily meet local needs
• help meet this plan's level of service
standards
• fulfill a high priority investment need as
defined in the statistically valid survey
report
• respond to demonstrated national or
regional trends of growth for more than
one year
• meet documented, growing local
demand
• meet needs generated by the city's
population growth
• provide a new and innovative experience
not already available within a reasonable
travel distance
• fit within the guidelines of a current
site master plan or framework plan (if a
particular location has been requested)
Fitness and wellness programs are available
to residents of all ages at the City's
community centers.
Northside Aztlan Community Center
Policy Framework / 227
Figure 18. Fort Collins Health Equity Index
Fort Collins City Plan, 2016
Source: Larimer County
Scores range from
0 to 100 with 100
indicating the highest
priority
0 - 20
40 - 60
60 - 80
80 - 100
20 - 40
22 FORT COLLINS CITY PLAN02 | VISION AND VALUES 23
Who you are and where you live in Fort Collins
can put you on a different path than a resident
from a different background or part of the
city. This can result in different outcomes for
your health, ability to access healthy food,
recreational opportunities and many other
areas that are critical to maintaining the high
quality of life City Plan envisions for all members
of our community. In this update, City Plan
utilized a health and equity lens to develop new
policies and implementation actions that can
help ensure that our actions and decisions do
not disproportionately burden one group over
another. As our city becomes more diverse, it will
be important to understand the barriers facing
certain groups or neighborhoods (whether they
be related to race, income, health, employment,
educational attainment, age, ability, etc.) so
that all residents have access to the services,
resources, infrastructure and opportunities they
need.
HEALTH AND EQUITY
What are Social Determinants of
Health?
Social determinants of health are the social and
physical conditions of a person’s life that influence
their personal health and well-being: education,
income level, access to health care, social and
community context, and neighborhood/built
environment. Research shows that residents who
live in poverty and have lower levels of educational
attainment are more likely to have poor health
outcomes and will be more vulnerable to impacts
from climate change. Understanding this linkage is
an important factor in planning for health equity.
HEALTH EQUITY INDEXFORT COLLINS, 2016 2016
How does it all connect?
The Health Equity Index analysis shows that social
factors related to health outcomes are not equal
in all parts of Fort Collins. Median household
income tends to be lower for non-white racial and
ethnic groups ($42,333 or less) than it is for white
households ($62,804). Educational attainment also
varies by race and ethnicity—for example, 42% of
Hispanic/Latinx residents had a bachelor’s degree
in 2016, compared with 59% of white residents.
Generally, the Health Equity Index shows that
more vulnerable or disadvantaged populations
(census block groups with high index values) are
clustered north of the Poudre River, while less
vulnerable populations (census block groups with
low index values) are clustered near Downtown.
These disparities in health equity have wide-ranging
implications for all outcome areas in City Plan.
What is the Health Equity Index?
The Health Equity Index, developed by the Larimer
County Department of Health and Environment
(LCDHE), is a tool to identify potentially vulnerable
areas of the community. It is a weighted index
made up of two calculated scores to determine
the geographic areas of highest need. The first
component includes an Equity Score, composed
of socioeconomic factors using the most recent
American Community Survey (ACS) estimates from
the U.S. Census Bureau. The second component, the
Health Score, is composed of health indicators from
500 Cities Data (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention). See the City Plan Trends and Forces
Report in the Appendix for more information.
Equity Indicators
»Population under age 18
»Population age 65 and older
»Households at or below the
Federal Poverty Level
»Hispanic/Latinx population
»Non-white (minority) population
»Households without a vehicle
»Disability status
Health Indicators
»Adult obesity
»Adults with no leisure-time physical
activity
»Adults who experienced poor mental
health for 14 or more days
Scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the highest priority.
The Health Equity Index is a composite measure of overall health equity in Fort Collins and
includes the following equity and health indicators:
2 .5 Promote public health and wellness
through public spaces programming.
Nearly all (99%) residents of Fort Collins agree that parks,
trails, recreation facilities, and programs improve physical
health and fitness. Fitness and wellness programs were the
second highest priority program for residents, and exercise
and fitness equipment was the second highest priority for
indoor facilities. Larimer County's Health Equity Index can
be used to identify the highest priority areas of the city for
addressing health and wellness.
Implementation Lead: Recreation
Implementation Partners: Community Services, Parks,
Natural Areas
2.5.1 Enhance fitness, wellness, and healthy
lifestyle programming.
2.5.2 Highlight the health and wellness benefits of
recreation programs in informational materials.
2.5.3 Collaborate with local healthcare providers
on a park prescription program.
Best Practice: Health and Wellness Programming
228 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Policy Framework / 229
GOAL
Expand the active transportation network
to support access to parks and recreation .
With more than 44 miles of paved, multi-use trails throughout the
city, Fort Collins is one of only five communities awarded Platinum
Bike Friendly Community status by the League of American
Bicyclists. The city has a strong network of cycling advocates and an
active base of casual cyclists, who use trails for both recreation and
transportation. The recent introduction of e-bikes has further grown
the number of cyclists using Fort Collins’ trails.
ACTIONS
• Expand the network of paved, multi-use trails.
• Increase safe routes to parks and recreation facilities.
• Ensure trails function for a range of recreational and
transportation users.
3 . TRAILS
“There are… very few
sidewalks that exist between
neighborhoods… We must
actively do the work to create
those connections.”
- OurCity Contributor
230 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
3 .1 Expand the network of paved, multi-use
trails.
Nearly two-thirds of residents identified paved, multi-use trails
as one of their top 4 most important outdoor facilities—more
than for any other outdoor facility. As Fort Collins continues
to implement its Paved Recreational Trail Master Plan (2013),
Trails Master Plan (2013), and Bicycle Master Plan (2014), this
plan can give guidance on connections between trails, parks,
and recreation facilities.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Parks, FC Moves, Engineering
3.1.1 Continue to implement the recommendations
of the Paved Recreational Trail Master
Plan and the Bicycle Master Plan.
3.1.2 Coordinate paved trail development with
transportation and stormwater planning.
3.1.3 Ensure all existing and future community parks
and community centers are connected to a
major paved trail. (See map on following page)
3.1.4 Evaluate opportunities to create better
connections across or around current
barriers, including major arterial streets.
3.1.5 Coordinate trail expansion with surrounding
communities and Larimer County.
3.1.6 Pursue agreements with irrigation
ditch companies to allow trail access
on or next to maintenance roads.
3.1.7 Coordinate trail expansion with developers.
Platinum Bike
Friendly Community
League of American BicyclistsFORTCOLL
I
NSACTIONS
Policy Framework / 231Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
Future Trails and Recommended Trails
Existing Trails
Future Trails
Proposed Trail Connections
232 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master PlanTaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect Rd Taft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
3 .2 Increase safe routes to parks and
recreation facilities.
In some parts of Fort Collins, parks and recreation facilities
are a short distance away from residents as the crow flies,
but missing sidewalks and trails make them difficult to access
on foot or by bicycle. Even with adequate sidewalks and
trails, some routes to parks and recreation facilities require
pedestrians or cyclists to cross major roads.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: FC Moves, Engineering, Planning
3.2.1 Fill gaps in sidewalks and on-street
bicycle facilities that connect parks and
recreation facilities to neighborhoods,
schools, transit, and other facilities.
3.2.2 Ensure transit connections to parks and
recreation facilities in the classifications
section. (See p. 115, 158)
3.2.3 Consider the use of signalization, signal
prioritization, pedestrian refuges, grade
separation, and other techniques where trails
cross wide and heavily trafficked roadways.
3.2.4 Consider physical barriers to access, and
how to avoid or overcome them, in the siting
of new parks and recreation facilities.
Opportunity: Additional Sidewalks
Figure 19. Increasing the walkability of a
neighborhood gives residents better access to
existing amenities.
Level of Service
Fort Collins has:
44
miles of paved, multi-use
trails180
miles of soft surface trails
Best Practice: Learning to Ride
Policy Framework / 233
3 .3 Ensure trails function for a range of
recreational and transportation users.
Trails in Fort Collins have seen usage grow as the city has
grown. With growth comes more potential for conflicts
between different types of users—between cyclists,
skateboarders, pedestrians, and runners who move at
different speeds; between those on e- or traditional bikes or
scooters; between users of varying skill levels; and between
those using trails for recreational purposes and those using
trails as quick modes of transportation.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Parks, FC Moves
3.3.1 Promote trail education and etiquette for both
skilled and novice users with signage or the
development of a “learn to ride” area for trails
added onto the Walk & Wheel Skills Hub.
3.3.2 Collaborate with regional partners to
develop regional trail wayfinding standards,
complementary to the city’s existing
wayfinding standards, that address
hierarchy, destinations, landmarks, identity,
and congestion for both recreational and
transportation users, and to be more accessible
to novice and non-English-speaking users.
3.3.3 Use striping on major trails to
separate traffic moving in opposite
directions, where appropriate.
3.3.4 Ensure paved trails are wide enough
for passing and that there is enough
space alongside trails to pull over.
3.3.5 Where widening of trails is not possible to
meet demand due to physical, environmental,
or other constraints, consider the development
of parallel trail and complete street corridors.
3.3.6 Maintain trails to defined standards to avoid
blockages caused by weather or disrepair.
The Walk & Wheel Hub is a place for novice
cyclists of all ages to learn the rules of the road.
Walk & Wheel Hub
234 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Policy Framework / 235
4 . RESOURCES
GOAL
Protect and enhance natural, historic, and
cultural resources in parks and increase
related activities .
Natural, historic, and cultural resources are irreplaceable assets. More
than half (52%) of survey respondents identified natural areas and
wildlife habitat as outdoor facilities important for their households—
behind only trails—and nearly half (44%) identified nature-based
recreation as important programs and activities—the highest of any
type of program or activity.
ACTIONS
• Integrate natural resources and natural resource
interpretation into the design of parks.
• Develop and promote nature-based education, recreation,
and training programs.
• Optimize the care of natural resources across parks and
natural areas.
• Capitalize on historic and cultural resources, themes, and
stories in parks and recreation facilities.
236 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
4 .1 Integrate natural resources and natural
resource interpretation into the design of
parks.
In Fort Collins, the Natural Areas Department acquires
and manages natural areas specifically to protect natural
resources. Yet, natural systems do not stop at property
boundaries. Natural resources within parks, including stream
corridors, plant communities, and wildlife, will be treated as
vital assets, with enhanced care and better integration into
park design.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Parks, Natural Areas
4.1.1 Promote the planting, preservation,
and maintenance of canopy trees.
4.1.2 Develop horticultural standards for parks
that emphasize native and resilient plants
over mowed lawn and paved paths in areas
that are conducive to this approach.
4.1.3 Integrate native plants and plants with high
pollinator value to increase the ecological
value and biodiversity of parks.
4.1.4 Prioritize the use of raw water or other
irrigation systems that conserve water
resources and build resiliency.
4.1.5 Add interpretive signage within parks
to highlight their natural resources
and the benefits they provide.
4.1.6 Explore opportunities to use public
art to interpret natural resources.
Low-Water Native
Plants for Colorado
Native plants are ideal for sustainable
landscapes. They are adapted to the
harsh climates, soil, and environmental
challenges. Natives also help to restore
habitat and increase biodiversity by
attracting pollinators.
PERENNIALS
Common Yarrow - Achillea millefolium
Fringed Sage - Artemisia frigida
Prairie Sage - Artemisia ludoviciana
Butterfly Millkweed - Asclepias tuberosa
Chocolate Flower - Berlandiera lyrata
Harebells - Campanula rotundifolia
Purple Prairie Clover - Dalea purpurea
Bush Sunflower - Helianthus pumilus
Gayfeather - Liatris punctata
Blue Flax - Linum lewisii
Desert Four O’Clock - Mirabilis multiflora
Bee Balm/Horsemint - Monarda fistulosa
Blue Mist Penstemon - Penstemon virens
Prairie Coneflower - Ratibida columnifera
Black-eyed Susan - Rudbeckia hirta
Pitcher Sage - Salvia azurea
Canada Goldenrod - Solidago canadensis
GRASS
Side-Oats Grama - Bouteloua curtipendula
Blue Grama - Bouteloua gracilis
Little Bluestem - Schizachyrium scoparium
SHRUBS
Serviceberry - Amelanchier alnifolia
Silvery Leadplant - Amorpha canescens
Rubber Rabbitbrush - Ericameria nauseosa
Apache Plume - Fallugia paradoxa
Western Sandcherry - Prunus besseyi
Golden Currant - Ribes aureum
Wax Currant - Ribes cereum
Smooth Sumac - Rhus glabra
Skunkbush Sumac - Rhus trilobata
Western Wild Rose - Rosa woodsii
Snowberry - Symphoricarpos occidentalis
TREES
Rocky Mountain Maple - Acer glabrum
Piñon Pine - Pinus edulis
Ponderosa Pine - Pinus ponderosa
Gambel Oak - Quercus gambelii
ACTIONS
Using native plantings instead of turf increases
biodiversity.
Sugar Beet Park
“Parks [should be] designed with
area character/story in mind—so
they are each unique.”
- Preston Middle School Open
House Attendee
Policy Framework / 237
4 .2 Develop and promote nature-based
education, recreation, and training
programs.
Nature-based programs offer participants new and continued
ways to connect with nature and appreciate the value
of natural resources. This builds advocacy across ages.
Currently, the Recreation Department and the Natural
Areas Department each offer nature-based programs, using
different methods of promoting the programs and different
pricing structures. This results in confusion for users.
Implementation Lead: Recreation
Implementation Partners: Natural Areas, Cultural Services
4.2.1 Offer nature-based education programs
that cater to different age groups, including
young children, teens, adults, and seniors.
4.2.2 Coordinate nature-based programs
across departments to avoid duplication
of offerings and competition.
4.2.3 Cross-promote nature-based
education, recreation, and training
programs in the Recreator.
4.2.4 Consider charging a nominal fee for nature-
based programs to increase the likelihood
that those who register attend.
Outdoor education is essential to creating the
next generation of stewards.
Poudre River Walk Program
Poudre River Downtown Master Plan
1‐6 | P a g e
Figure 1.10a Character Zone Map (West Side)
Best Practice: Natural Resource Management across Site Boundaries
238 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
4 .3 Optimize the care of natural resources
across parks and natural areas.
The Parks and Natural Areas Departments each have
responsibility over defining the standard of care of natural
resources within the properties they maintain. While there
is often knowledge sharing between the departments, there
are opportunities to seek alignment to better steward cross-
boundary natural resources..
Implementation Lead: Parks
Implementation Partners: Natural Areas, Park Planning and
Development
4.3.1 Create a shared approach for the care
and maintenance of plantings and habitat
areas across City-owned properties.
The Poudre River Downtown Master Plan acknowledges that natural
resource areas cross department boundaries and should be treated as a
holistic system.
Poudre River Downtown Plan
Best Practice: Historic Interpretation
Policy Framework / 239
4 .4 Capitalize on historic and cultural
resources, themes, and stories in parks
and recreation facilities.
Whether preserving important sites or architecture, as at
Library Park, incorporating themes from Fort Collins’ history,
as with the playground at Twin Silo Park, or telling stories
about neighborhood change and development, as at Sugar
Beet Park, parks and recreation facilities provide a setting
for learning about, appreciating, and interacting with unique
cultural stories.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Parks, Cultural Services,
Neighborhood Services, Historic Preservation, Recreation
4.4.1 Continue to include historical and cultural
interpretative elements in new and existing parks
and recreation facilities, where appropriate.
4.4.2 Identify critical historic and cultural resources
that may need protection and have potential
educational and interpretive components.
The Twin Silo Park playground turns history into
an interactive experience.
Twin Silo Park
240 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Policy Framework / 241
5 . FUNDING
GOAL
Enhance the financial sustainability of
parks and recreation .
The City strives to use taxpayer dollars wisely. While the Parks
and Recreation Departments have stretched operational budgets
to maintain existing parks, recreation facilities, and other city
infrastructure, additional capital and operational funding is needed
to ensure all parks and recreation facilities continue to provide the
level of experience that residents seek. A full range of funding needs
include day-to-day operations and maintenance costs as well as
capital costs for replacing individual park and recreation amenities
at the end of their life cycles, refreshing existing parks, and building
new parks and recreation facilities in both growing and established
parts of the city.
ACTIONS
• Secure sufficient funding to develop, maintain, and
program parks and recreation facilities as well as enhanced
infrastructure.
• Consider and budget for both up-front and ongoing costs
and benefits in maintenance and capital budgeting.
• Continue to generate revenue from parks, recreation
facilities, and programs that can be reinvested back into
these assets.
“Consider alternative funding
streams used in other cities.”
- Preston Middle School Open
House Attendee
242 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
5 .1 Secure sufficient funding to develop,
maintain, and program parks and
recreation facilities as well as enhanced
infrastructure.
The operation of parks and recreation facilities comes
primarily from user fees and the city’s general fund, which
is heavily dependent on sales tax revenue. Construction of
new parks in growing parts of Fort Collins comes primarily
from capital expansion fees. While these fees are meant to
offset the cost of providing services to new development,
they have not kept pace with actual construction costs, due
to escalation in land and raw water valuations, increases in
construction costs, and higher quality facilities designed
to meet residents’ evolving expectations. New recreation
facilities and park upgrades in established parts of the city
rely on additional funding, such as the Building on Basics
program approved by voters. However, Building on Basics and
the general fund do not provide adequate capital funding for
long-term asset management of recreation and park facilities.
Two thirds of survey respondents indicated they would be
supportive of an increase in taxes to fund the types of parks,
trails, and recreation facilities that are most important to
them.
Implementation Lead: Community Services
Implementation Partners: Parks, Recreation, Park Planning
and Development, Finance
5.1.1 Regularly adjust capital improvement expansion
fees to cover the costs of building new parks.
5.1.2 Explore the potential for a new
capital improvement expansion
fee for recreation facilities.
5.1.3 Identify a dedicated funding stream
for capital investments in existing
parks and recreation facilities.
5.1.4 Identify a funding source to support
park construction and the expansion
of parks and recreation facilities in
established parts of the city.
ACTIONS
Policy Framework / 243
5 .2 Consider and budget for both up-front
and ongoing costs and benefits in
maintenance and capital budgeting.
Building capital projects is necessary to provide the public
spaces and services that residents expect. It is seen as a
sign of progress. While some capital investments come with
a warranty period, all capital investments inevitably require
maintenance and replacement.
Implementation Lead: Community Services
Implementation Partners: Finance, Parks, Recreation, Park
Planning and Development, Environmental Services
5.2.1 Identify asset management schedules
and set maintenance schedules and
standards for assets and capital facilities
at the time they are approved.
5.2.2 Plan for increases in operations and
maintenance budgets for the Parks and
Recreation Departments commensurate
with additional assets and capital facilities
that they are required to operate and
maintain (e.g., enhanced infrastructure).
Time
Major RefreshPark/Facility ValueInitial Investment
Time
Major RefreshPark/Facility ValueLife cycle
replacement
Initial Investment
Time
Major RefreshPark/Facility ValueInitial Investment
Time
Major RefreshPark/Facility ValueLife cycle
replacement
Initial Investment
Figure 20. Consistent reinvestment,
through maintenance and life cycle
replacement (top), extends the value
of parks and recreation facilities when
compared to waiting until a major
refresh is necessary to start reinvesting
(bottom).
Park/Facility Investment Over Time
244 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
5 .3 Continue to generate revenue from parks,
recreation facilities, and programs that
can be reinvested back into these assets.
The Recreation Department currently recovers in revenue
about 58% of what it spends on operations, more than twice
the national median for agencies serving cities with a similar
population density.
Implementation Lead: Recreation
Implementation Partners: Parks, Neighborhood Services
5.3.1 Regularly update recreational fees and
charges based on a defined pricing
and cost recovery philosophy.
5.3.2 Continue to set cost recovery targets for
each program area based on costs, the
degree to which it provides a public benefit,
and market competition. (See p. 83)
5.3.3 Evaluate the use of additional pricing strategies—
including by residency, day of week, time of
day—to increase cost recovery. (See p. 208)
5.3.4 Expand the offering or permitting of concessions
in community parks, at trail-heads, and at
special events in parks and recreation facilities.
5.3.5 Pursue additional revenue from special events,
such as weddings and quinceañeras, that
rent park and recreation facility spaces.
5.3.6 Expand capacity to proactively set revenue
goals, seek revenue generating opportunities,
provide a point of contact for those
looking to rent public spaces for events,
and liaise with the City’s overall special
events office and the visitor center for the
entire Community Services service area.
5.3.7 Engage private, nonprofit, and public
philanthropic partners in support of the
parks, trails, facilities and programming.
Through City Give, donors can make
charitable gifts to the City of Fort
Collins that reflect their personal
and family passions. Charitable gifts
cannot be redirected by elected
officials or senior leadership, and are
tax-deductible.
As elected officials and administration
change over time, City Give will
remain independent and non-partisan,
focusing on the long-term vibrancy of
our community.
City Give is NOT: A foundation or
grant-giving organization. Nor, is
it a vehicle to fund programs and
services not funded through the City’s
Budgeting for Outcomes process.
58%
of operation spending in
recreation is recovered in
revenue2X
the national median
Policy Framework / 245
The Poudre River Whitewater Park brings spectators and visitors from
across Fort Collins and beyond.
Poudre River Whitewater Park
246 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Policy Framework / 247
6 . PARTNERSHIPS
GOAL
Strengthen partnerships to leverage
resources for mutual benefit .
Residents of Fort Collins benefit from having access to amenities
provided by the City and other entities, including Larimer County
and the Poudre School District. In an era of limited resources,
partnerships can help deliver more efficient and effective services.
By strengthening existing partnerships and identifying new partners,
the City can leverage its resources to make limited funding stretch
further. Important to these partnerships are finding common
goals, such that each partner benefits from the arrangement, and
formalizing agreements to hold each partner accountable.
ACTIONS
• Strengthen partnerships between City departments.
• Formalize and strengthen partnerships with other major
providers of parks, recreation facilities, and programs in
Fort Collins and the North Front Range.
• Regularly revise or create partnership agreements to
ensure fair and equitable relationships.
• Support and strengthen resident opportunities for
involvement, volunteerism and giving in support of parks,
recreation, and trails.
“[Fort Collins needs a] hybrid
between parks and natural areas
where people can recreate in a
natural setting outside sensitive
habitat areas.”
- Lincoln Center Open House
Attendee
248 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
6 .1 Strengthen partnerships between City
departments.
While each City department has specialized expertise core
to its responsibilities, departmental silos can also lead to
duplication of effort and inefficiency in achieving policy goals.
There is particular opportunity at the service area level for
departments to work together to achieve common goals.
These collaborations should be formalized to endure staff
changes.
Implementation Lead: Community Services
Implementation Partners: Park Planning and Development,
Parks, Recreation, Natural Areas, Utilities, Stormwater,
Environmental Services, Engineering, FC Moves,
Transportation
6.1.1 Enable opportunities for joint projects among
the Park Planning and Development, Parks,
Recreation, Natural Areas, and Utilities
Departments; Engineering; and FC Moves.
6.1.2 Develop and maintain consistent
asset management systems across the
Community Services service area.
6.1.3 Consider consolidating existing department-
level marketing, communication, and
partnership functions at the Community
Services service area level to improve
coordination and unify messaging.
6.1.4 Consolidate existing department-level
budgeting and finance functions at the
Community Services service area level.
6.1.5 Request boards and commissions to consider
and support multi-benefit projects.
ACTIONS
Policy Framework / 249
6 .2 Formalize and strengthen partnerships
with other major providers of parks,
recreation facilities, and programs in Fort
Collins and the North Front Range.
Though the City of Fort Collins is the largest provider of parks,
recreation facilities, and programs in Fort Collins, the full set
of experiences currently available to residents is dependent
on other providers. For example, the City of Fort Collins owns
roughly half of all public playgrounds and fields in the city,
while the Poudre School District owns the other half, and
Larimer County may be building ice facilities that will alleviate
local demand.
Implementation Lead: Parks
Implementation Partners: Recreation, Poudre School District,
Thompson School District, CSU, Larimer County, Park
Planning and Development
6.2.1 Develop formal intergovernmental agreements
with the Poudre School District and the
Thompson School District to ensure open
access to playgrounds, fields, courts, gyms,
pools, and park areas on school and City
property when school is not in session.
6.2.2 Formalize cooperative maintenance agreements
with the Poudre School District and the
Thompson School District that address where
and to what standards the City and the districts
will operate on each other’s property.
6.2.3 Collaborate with CSU, the Poudre School
District, and the Thompson School District
to understand the recreational needs of
students and to explore joint-use facilities.
6.2.4 Coordinate with Larimer County and surrounding
communities on the provision of recreational
facilities, such as ice rinks, to prevent duplication.
6.2.5 Pursue agreements with irrigation
ditch companies to allow trail access
on or next to maintenance roads.
Learning Landscapes is a program
at the University of Colorado Denver
that transforms neglected public
elementary schoolyards into attractive
and safe multi-use parks tailored
to the needs and desires of their
neighbors and communities.
The Learning Landscape model is a
great example of turning school yards
into public spaces that serve the city
and the community.
Best Practice: Partnerships
Partnerships with ditch companies may lead to
opportunities to expand the trail network.
Fort Collins Ditch and Pipeline Network
250 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
6 .3 Regularly revise or create partnership
agreements to ensure fair and equitable
relationships.
Successful partnerships are borne of clear responsibilities
and mutual benefit. As circumstances change, partnership
agreements may need to be updated to accurately reflect
roles and responsibilities.
Implementation Lead: Community Services
Implementation Partners: Parks, Recreation
6.3.1 Develop a guide to partnership agreements
to help organizations navigate the
process of becoming a partner.
6.3.2 Assign a staff liaison for each partner to
improve communication and collaboration.
6.3.3 Track and regularly share information and
measurable outcomes of partnership agreements.
Partnerships with other departments and
vendors make events possible.
Open Streets
Policy Framework / 251
6 .4 Support and strengthen resident
opportunities for involvement,
volunteerism and giving in support of
parks, recreation, and trails.
Resident engagement plays an important role in supporting
and caring for park, recreation, and trails. The City will
continue to seek ways to make it easy for resident to engage.
Implementation Lead: Community Services
Implementation Partners: Parks, Recreation, City Give,
Volunteer Services
6.4.1 Identify a diverse range of strategies for
increasing resident engagement, and the
giving of time, talent and treasure.
6.4.2 Encourage workplace giving programs—
from volunteer events to community
campaigns— with companies, institutions,
nonprofits and large organizations.
6.4.3 Facilitate volunteerism and resident
engagement throughout citywide events.
Volunteerism can provide opportunities to
involve community members in the care of and
advocacy for parks, recreation, and trails.
Lee Martinez Community Park Clean Up
252 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Policy Framework / 253
7 . O&M
GOAL
Ensure parks, paved trails, and recreation
facilities are operated and maintained
efficiently and to defined standards .
Maintenance standards and operations procedures help ensure that
the City is maintaining similar facilities efficiently and at the same
level.
ACTIONS
• Ensure maintenance standards are clear and consistently
implemented.
• Strengthen sustainability policies and practices.
“There are many beautiful and
well-maintained parks.”
- Lincoln Center Open House
Attendee
254 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
7 .1 Ensure maintenance standards are clear
and consistently implemented.
Through site analysis and stakeholder interviews, it was
reported that similar spaces are maintained to different
standards. At the same time, each department has particular
expertise in maintaining certain landscapes and facilities.
Clarifying and regularizing maintenance standards will ensure
high-quality spaces exist equitably across the entire public
space network.
Implementation Lead: Parks
Implementation Partners: Recreation, Natural Areas,
Operation Services, Utilities, Park Planning and Development
7.1.1 Encourage cross-departmental knowledge
sharing and training on maintenance practices.
7.1.2 Develop unified standards across the
departments that manage the city’s
public spaces for maintaining similar
types of spaces and facilities.
7.1.3 Define and regularly update maintenance
standards for each park and recreation
facility classification and trails, taking
into account usage and visibility.
7.1.4 Consider assignment of maintenance
responsibilities across departments and
property lines to cater to each department’s
strengths and knowledgebase, increase
efficiency, and enhance the user experience.
7.1.5 Identify opportunities to share
maintenance responsibilities with partner
organizations and groups for efficiency,
using formalized agreements.
7.1.6 Ensure maintenance safety checklists
include obstacles to universal access.
ACTIONS
Invasive Plants in
Colorado
Invasive plants can be a serious threat
to local ecologies and can easily
take over an area of unmaintained
park. Federal and state resources are
available to keep track of the latest
invasive species and their spread.
• invasivespeciesinfo.gov/us/
colorado
• ag.colorado.gov/conservation/
noxious-weeds
"Every park in the city needs
shade/trees planted [near]
playground structures and
benches.”
- OurCity Contributor
Policy Framework / 255
7 .2 Strengthen sustainability policies and
practices.
Changing environmental conditions and resource
consumption have a direct impact on natural resources.
By strengthening sustainability policies, the public space
system can lead by example to preserve and conserve natural
resources, serving as a model for other organizations and
residents.
Implementation Lead: Parks
Implementation Partners: Recreation, Natural Areas,
Operation Services, Environmental Services, Park Planning
and Development, Sustainability Services
7.2.1 Target waste reduction, recycling, reduced
greenhouse gas emissions, reduced energy
usage, reduced water consumption, and light
pollution for increasing sustainable practices.
7.2.2 Take climate change predictions into account
in the design of parks and facilities and in
maintenance and operations practices.
7.2.3 Continue to identify sustainable
water sources for irrigation.
7.2.4 Conduct pilot projects to test
effectiveness for citywide usage.
7.2.5 Continue to prioritize biodiversity
and emphasize native and water-wise
plants over non-native species.
7.2.6 Remove invasive species.
7.2.7 Use environmentally friendly
products (e.g., cleaners and chemical
treatments) where feasible.
7.2.8 Provide training for staff on how to include
sustainability in evaluating costs and benefits.
7.2.9 Develop outreach and education
programs on sustainable practices.
7.2.10 Continue to pursue environmental certification,
such as LEED or SITES, of parks and facilities.
256 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Policy Framework / 257
GOAL
Promote the synergy between parks,
recreation, and economic health .
Parks, trails, and recreation facilities provide tremendous value
beyond being places for reflection, connection with nature, and
physical activity. Nearly all (97%) of residents in Fort Collins feel that
parks, paved trails, recreation facilities, and programs are important
to the city’s identity. Parks, trails, and recreation facilities attract
residents, businesses, and tourists alike. Studies have consistently
shown that proximity to high quality parks and recreation facilities
contributes to higher property values. In Colorado, outdoor
recreation generates over $13 billion in consumer spending every
year.13
ACTIONS
• Provide amenities for residents while unlocking
recreation tourism potential.
• Encourage new park- and recreation-oriented
development or redevelopment to capitalize on the
economic value of parks, trails, and recreation facilities.
8 . ECONOMIC HEALTH
258 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
8 .1 Provide amenities for residents while
unlocking recreation tourism potential.
As the City looks to leverage parks and recreation as
economic drivers, the primary focus should continue to be on
serving the residents of Fort Collins. The City’s Sports Facility
Market and Feasibility Analysis (2019) sparked conversations
about the inability of tourism dollars to offset the cost of
building facilities that are primarily for tournaments and
events. However, the focus should be on building facilities
primarily to meet the needs of residents, but which due to
their secondary use for tournaments and events can have a
share of costs offset by tourism dollars.
Implementation Lead: Recreation
Implementation Partners: Visit Fort Collins, Fort Collins
Chamber of Commerce
8.1.1 Revisit and reframe the added tourism
benefits of parks and recreation facilities built
primarily to meet residents’ needs—including
event spaces and sports complexes.
8.1.2 Support the development of citywide
tourist infrastructure—including hotel rooms
and food and beverage establishments—
near parks and recreation facilities.
8.1.3 Collaborate with Visit Fort Collins, the Fort
Collins Chamber of Commerce, and other
organizations to market parks and recreation
facilities as destinations for residents and
visitors from the city, region, and beyond.
ACTIONS
97%
of residents in Fort
Collins feel that parks,
paved trails, recreation
facilities, and programs
are important to the
city’s identity .
Policy Framework / 259
8 .2 Encourage new park- and recreation-
oriented development or redevelopment
to capitalize on the economic value of
parks, trails, and recreation facilities.
Parks, trails, and recreation facilities are increasingly valuable
for surrounding property values, providing a boost to both
residential and commercial areas. These amenities are also
essential to attracting businesses and talent.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Planning
8.2.1 Guide developers during the development review
process to ensure development interfaces with
adjacent parks, trails, and recreation facilities.
8.2.2 Develop land use, subarea plans, and corridor
plans that encourage park- and recreation-
oriented development or redevelopment.
8.2.3 Pursue public-private partnerships for mutual
benefit and to stretch public dollars.
Approximately 3,100
rooms among 33
hotels are currently
offered in Fort Collins .
Inviting, park-oriented development as
envisioned for Midtown Fort Collins.
Fort Collins Midtown Plan
6-10 Midtown Plan
september 2013 draftcourtyards and plazasCourtyards and plazas provide places for people to gather, engage in activities and enjoy a sense of community, and these are encouraged throughout m idtown. t hese places should be planned to activate streets and enhance the pedestrian experience. 1. Design a plaza or courtyard to be inviting.a. o rient this space to link with other pedestrian activi-ties, primary circulation paths, views and natural fea-tures.
b. s ize the space to provide a comfortable scale for pe-
destrians.
c. d e fine the space with building fronts that convey a
human scale.
d. l ocating a space at the sidewalk level is preferred; a
sunken or raised courtyard separated from the side-
walk is discouraged.
e. take advantage of solar access.
f. p r ovide seating so people may rest.
d esign a plaza or courtyard to be inviting.
Courtyards and plazas provide places for people to gather, engage in activities and enjoy a sense of community.
orient plazas/courtyards to link
with other pedestrian activities,
circulation paths, views and natural
features.
plazas and courtyards should take
advantage of solar access.
size the space to provide a
comfortable scale for pedestrians.
260 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Policy Framework / 261
GOAL
Improve marketing and communication to
enhance operations and user satisfaction .
Successful parks, trails, recreation facilities, and programs hinge
on user awareness, enthusiasm, and participation. The City should
continue to improve its ongoing engagement and communication
practices by considering a more holistic strategy and additional
outreach tactics to more equitably inform and get feedback from a
broad spectrum of existing and potential users.
ACTIONS
• Promote parks and recreation as part of a unified public
space system.
• Update and develop new marketing and communication
materials that increase awareness and highlight the
benefits of parks, trails, recreation facilities, and
programs.
• Regularly measure and report on the progress of Master
Plan implementation.
• Engage users, partners, and staff in the planning,
development, programming, and maintenance of parks
and recreation facilities.
9 . COMMUNICATION
Best Practice: Public Space System Imageability
262 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
9 .1 Promote parks and recreation as part of
a unified public space system.
There is currently no unified map or informational resource
to understand all components of Fort Collins’ public space
system—parks, paved and unpaved trails, recreation facilities,
natural areas, stormwater management areas, and community
gardens. While residents may have their favorite parks or
natural areas that they visit, having separate informational
resources precludes an understanding of how these resources
are all physically connected—that one may be able to walk
or ride their bike between resources—or the full array of
programs offered by various City departments.
Implementation Lead: Community Services
Implementation Partners: Parks, Recreation, Park Planning
and Development, Natural Areas, Streets, Utilities, School
Districts
9.1.1 Consider consolidating existing department-
level marketing and communication functions
at the Community Services service area level.
9.1.2 Create new maps and guides with a
universal graphic style for parks, trails,
recreation facilities, and natural areas.
ACTIONS
The idea and physical form of the Emerald
Necklace in Boston, is broadly understood by
Bostonians and visitors.
Boston Emerald Necklace
iN PROGRESS:TRAiL USE
MONiTORiNG
Arlington currently monitors
bicycle and pedestrian usage with
approximately 40 counters along
selected trails and bike lanes. Data
captured by the counters is publicly
available on the web and can be
accessed through an interactive
map of counter locations. Below is a
counter along the Custis Trail.
WRT
90 / ARLiNGTON PUBLiC SPACES MASTER PLAN / STRATEGiC DiRECTiONS2.3.4. Explore ways to safely separate modes, where space allows, on high traffic trail routes and where user conflicts commonly occur, while
minimizing impact on natural resources and
trees.
Separating bicycle and pedestrian traffic on the
most heavily used routes will enhance the safety of
all users.
2.3.5. Explore creative and efficient ways to educate
users about trail etiquette.
While there are established rules about trail
etiquette, users may not be aware of or remember
the rules. Trails function more safely when all users
understand the range of other users they may
encounter and are aware of the “rules of the road.”
Trail etiquette messaging should be coordinated
with BikeArlington, WalkArlington and other
campaigns.
2.3.6. Continue to develop “learn to ride” areas that
provide protected spaces for novice users to
learn to bicycle.
Arlington has a learning loop at Glencarlyn Park
that can serve as a model for this type of facility.
The County should explore dedicating areas for
“traffic gardens” or “bike campuses” which allow
users to learn and practice bicycle riding, handling
and street skills in a safe learning environment.
2.3.7. Expand trail use monitoring to track usage across
all major trails by mode, and use gathered data to
help guide the trail planning process.
Some Primary and Secondary Multi-Use Trails
are regularly monitored to determine general trail
usage. Expanded monitoring and data evaluation
can shed light on how many people are using the
trail system.
Arlington, VA currently monitors bicycle and
pedestrian usage with counters along selected
trails and bike lanes.
Arlington Trail Counter
Policy Framework / 263
9 .2 Update and develop new marketing and
communication materials that increase
awareness and highlight the benefits of
parks, trails, recreation facilities, and
programs.
Nearly a third (33%) of survey respondents indicated that
they do not use parks and recreation facilities or programs
because they do not know where to go or what is offered. The
two methods they indicated they would most prefer to learn
about parks, recreation programs, activities, and events are
the Recreator (48%) and the City’s website (32%).
Implementation Lead: Community Services
Implementation Partners: Parks, Recreation, Park Planning
and Development, Natural Areas, Cultural Services
9.2.1 Ensure communication materials and signage
use consistent language to refer to parks
and facilities of different classifications.
9.2.2 Develop materials that communicate the
full range of facilities and experiences
available across the city to all
residents, workers, and visitors.
9.2.3 Highlight the environmental, social,
economic, and wellness benefits of parks,
trails, recreation facilities, and programs.
9.2.4 Highlight facilities with natural and historic
resources in marketing materials.
9.2.5 Communicate the availability of physically and
financially accessible facilities and programs.
9.2.6 Ensure materials are written in relatable
language and are accessible to non-English
speakers and the visually impaired.
9.2.7 Explore expanded use of technology and
digital platforms to disseminate information
about parks, recreation, and trails and
to enhance the user experience.
9.2.8 Provide more robust information on
each park, trail, recreation facility, and
program on the City's website.
33%
of survey respondents
indicated that they do not
use parks and recreation
facilities or programs
because they do not know
where to go or what is
offered
Best Practice: User Feedback
264 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
9 .3 Regularly measure and report on the
progress of Master Plan implementation.
The momentum of engagement achieved through the process
of developing the Master Plan should continue through its
implementation. Both small and large achievements should be
celebrated as steps toward achieving this plan’s vision.
Implementation Lead: Community Services
Implementation Partners: Parks, Recreation, Park Planning
and Development
9.3.1 Produce an annual report on Park and
Recreation operations, including progress
on Master Plan implementation.
Residents provide input on their park and
recreation needs
Preston Middle School Open House
Policy Framework / 265
9 .4 Engage users, partners, and staff in the
planning, development, programming,
and maintenance of parks and recreation
facilities.
Collaborative engagement among users, partners, and staff
can bring to light mutual desires and expectations. Lines of
communication should not only be used for major planning
and capital projects but remain open on an ongoing basis to
create feedback loops and improve user experiences.
Implementation Lead: Community Services
Implementation Partners: Parks, Recreation, Park Planning
and Development, Natural Areas
9.4.1 Conduct a needs assessment, including
a statistically valid survey and level of
service analysis, at least every 5 years.
9.4.2 Use inclusive, transparent, and creative
engagement practices that encourage
participation by all community members.
9.4.3 Engage users on an ongoing basis to evaluate
the success of parks, trails, recreation facilities,
and programs to establish a meaningful
feedback loop between the City and residents.
9.4.4 Proactively engage communities adjacent
to parks and recreation facilities about
the benefits of programs and facilities to
inspire users to participate more often.
9.4.5 Engage communities in the master planning of
new or refreshed parks and recreation facilities,
including historically marginalized voices.
9.4.6 Monitor and evaluate trends in engagement
tools and platforms that can increase
users’ interaction with the City.
9.4.7 Use online and social media regularly to
inform and solicit feedback from residents.
266 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Policy Framework / 267
GOAL
Elevate the design of and connection to
nature in parks and recreation facilities .
Design excellence enhances wellness, ecosystem services, and
function. From the earliest stages of project development, it is
important to consider how a project can be beautiful and multi-
functional while addressing the needs of adjacent communities.
Design excellence requires an attention to quality of built structures,
landscape typology, and the way buildings and landscapes interact
with each other. Integrating artists and designers early in the process
can help lead to design excellence. Elevating the quality of design of
parks and recreation facilities will also serve to elevate the level of
design across Fort Collins.
ACTIONS
• Develop a unified design language for parks and
recreation facilities that is flexible enough to allow for
individualized park identities.
• Strive for design excellence in the development and
refresh of parks and recreation facilities.
• Promote the planting, preservation, and maintenance of
canopy trees and native vegetation on public and private
land. (See 4.1., p. 236)
• Incorporate public art, including landscape-based art and
functional art, into parks and recreation facilities.
10 . DESIGN
Best Practice: Trail System & Design
268 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
10 .1 Develop a unified design language
for parks and recreation facilities
that is flexible enough to allow for
individualized park identities.
Though design evolves over time, through changing
preferences, the availability of materials, and more informed
practices, it is possible to use plantings, color, materiality,
and other devices to achieve a cohesion that allows users to
immediately identify that they are in a Fort Collins park or
recreation facility.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Parks, Recreation
10.1.1 Identify elements, such as signage, lighting,
and plantings, that can be standardized across
all parks and recreation facilities to increase
efficiency and create a cohesive identity.
10.1.2 Standardize the design language of structures
and equipment across schoolside parks,
neighborhood parks, mini parks, and urban parks.
10.1.3 Develop a design framework for
community parks and recreation facilities
that is cohesive but flexible enough
to allow for individual identities.
ACTIONS
Through design, parks and trails can be
seamlessly integrated.
Poudre River Whitewater Park
“With all the new apartment
construction, we need to be
intentional about creating green
space with walking/running/
riding trails.”
- OurCity Contributor
Policy Framework / 269
10 .2 Strive for design excellence in the
development and refresh of parks and
recreation facilities.
Though more recent parks, such as Spring Canyon
Community Park, Twin Silo Community Park, and Sugar Beet
Park, have elevated the level of design, many of Fort Collins’
parks and recreation facilities feel frozen in time—meticulously
maintained as they were when they were built. Refreshes of
parks and recreation facilities will provide an opportunity to
not just replace individual elements in kind but to reimagine
the parks' and recreation facilities' design to increase usability;
environmental, social, and economic benefits; and aesthetic
appeal.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Parks, Recreation
10.2.1 Use this plan’s design guidelines as a
reference in designing or refreshing parks
and recreation facilities. (See p. 105)
10.2.2 Study and visit award winning parks
and recreation facilities to keep up to
date on successful design solutions.
10.2.3 Partner with local and nationally recognized
designers to add different design perspectives.
10.2.4 Incorporate best practices in park
and recreation planning, design, and
operation from other park systems.
10.2.5 Pursue state and national awards from
organizations such as the Colorado Parks
& Recreation Association (CPRA), the
National Recreation and Park Association
(NRPA), the American Institute of
Architects (AIA), the American Society
of Landscape Architects (ASLA), and the
American Planning Association (APA).
Twin Silo Park represents a high level of design
excellence within the park system.
Twin Silo Park Shelters
270 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
10 .3 Promote the planting, preservation, and
maintenance of canopy trees and native
vegetation on public and private land.
Natural resources within and outside of parks, including
stream corridors, plant communities, and wildlife, should not
only be preserved but actively enhanced.
Implementation Lead: Parks
Implementation Partners: Park Planning and Development,
Natural Areas
10.3.1 Practice sound arboriculture practices,
including diversification of species; monitoring
and managing insect and disease impacts;
and preparing for unanticipated events, such
as extreme weather, and climate change.
10.3.2 Replace every tree that is removed from
maintained areas to create adequate
canopy cover and to maximize the
benefits of the urban forest.
10.3.3 Protect existing trees when new parks and
recreation facilities are in development,
or when existing parks and recreation
facilities are maintained or refreshed.
10.3.4 Continue to maintain and enhance
natural resources in accordance with
the Natural Areas Master Plan.
10 .4 Incorporate public art, including
landscape-based art and functional art,
into parks and recreation facilities.
In alignment with FoCo Creates and the Art in Public Places
programs, public art can enhance the experience in parks and
recreation facilities. Public art can tell stories, reveal histories,
and provide opportunities for whimsy or reflection. Involving
artists in the design process can ensure that public art works
with, rather than detracts from, the user experience.
Implementation Lead: Park Planning and Development
Implementation Partners: Parks, Cultural Services,
Recreation
10.4.1 Develop a master plan for art in parks that
addresses selection of artists, provision of
design parameters for artists, and other
guidance specific to working with artists
on parks, recreation, and trail projects in
order to enrich the user experience.
10.4.2 Integrate public art design and installation
timelines with overall park and recreation
facility design and construction timelines.
FoCo Creates is the updated Arts &
Culture Master Plan for the City of
Fort Collins from 2019 through 2029.
"Expand and fund art opportunities
and experiences throughout the city
with informal performances, pop-up
temporary art exhibits, etc. in parks,
neighborhoods, and civic facilities
such as City Hall and The Gardens on
Spring Creek."
A Ten Year Vision
Policy Framework / 271
The creek restoration at Twin Silo Park (above), completed in partnership
with the Stormwater Department, provides lessons that could be applied
citywide, such as in Avery Park (below).
Twin Silo Park and Avery Park
272 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Policy Framework / 273
GOAL
Continue to enhance safety and security in
all parks and facilities .
Concern about safety, whether real or perceived, keeps some
residents from using parks and recreation facilities.
ACTIONS
• Ensure adequate “eyes on the street” around and in parks
and recreation facilities.
• Update guidelines and policies on safety and security.
11 . SAFETY
“Keep up the great work by the
rangers!”
- OurCity Contributor
274 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
11 .1 Ensure adequate “eyes on the street”
around and in parks and recreation
facilities.
The most effective way to improve the perception of safety
and reduce the incidence of crime is to support a visible
community presence in parks and recreation facilities.
The more parks and recreation facilities are used by the
community, the more “eyes on the street” there are and the
less inviting they are to unwanted activities.
Implementation Lead: Parks
Implementation Partners: Park Planning and Development,
Planning, Safety and Risk Management
11.1.1 Expand the park ranger program to reduce
the area each ranger has to patrol.
11.1.2 Consider developing a Park Ambassador program
akin to the Natural Areas Volunteer Ranger
Assistant program to increase resident presence
and encourage rule enforcement in parks.
11.1.3 Encourage new development to face,
rather than turn its back, to parks and
recreation facilities. (See p. 105)
11.1.4 Work to avoid or eliminate “backs” of
parks and recreation facilities.
ACTIONS
Park rangers are critical to user safety.
Fort Collins Park Rangers
Policy Framework / 275
11 .2 Update guidelines and policies on safety
and security.
The City should clarify the ways it intends to combat safety
concerns, whether through people-based approaches or
through design-based approaches. Almost a quarter (23%)
of survey respondents indicated that they do not use
parks, recreation facilities, or programs because of people
experiencing homelessness there.
Implementation Lead: Parks
Implementation Partners: Park Planning and Development,
Homeward Alliance, Safety and Risk Management
11.2.1 Incorporate Crime Prevention through
Environmental Design (CPTED) principles
into design standards. (see sidebar at left)
11.2.2 Continue to provide safety training for all staff
who work in parks and recreation facilities.
11.2.3 Collaborate with local providers, such as
Homeward Alliance, to connect those in
parks who are experiencing homelessness
to available resources and services.
Principles of Crime
Prevention Through
Environmental Design
Natural surveillance
Natural surveillance is all about
making it hard for a person to hide
or go unnoticed in public. Things like
installing lighting and eliminating blind
spots can help a park feel safer.
Natural Access Control
Natural access control is directing
people towards proper entrances
through the use of paths, lighting,
vegetation, and signage.
Territorial Reinforcement
This purpose of this principle is to
clearly distinguish between public and
private space. This creates a sphere of
influence the dissuades criminal acts
from occurring.
Maintenance
This principle is simply about keeping
public spaces maintained and clean,
letting people know the place is cared
for and used.
Source: http://cptedsecurity.com
IMPLEMENTATION
278 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Implementation / 279
ACTION PLAN
The action plan consolidates all of the goals, actions,
and methods of the policy framework into a matrix that
can be used as a quick reference guide and checklist for
implementation of the plan’s recommendations.
280 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
1 . PROVIDE EQUITABLE ACCESS TO PARKS .
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
1 .1 Expand the usability of existing parks .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Parks, Planning, Neighborhood Services,
Natural Areas, Utilities, School Districts,
Cultural Resources
1.1.1 Consider potential connections and synergies
of adjacent parks, recreation facilities, natural
areas, stormwater management lands, schools,
trails, and complete streets to maximize user
experience and benefits when developing
corridor, subarea, or redevelopment plans.
ongoing
1.1.2 Ensure that every park has a framework plan to
identify the intended uses and in what areas of the
park those intended uses are meant to occur.
short term
(0–5 years)
1.4.1
1.1.3 Comprehensively evaluate the design and
function of parks on a regular basis using this
plan’s design guidelines to determine if they
need to be refreshed. (See p. 105)
ongoing 2.1.2
1.1.4 Develop master plans for all parks
in need of a major refresh.
ongoing 1.4.1
1.1.5 Seek opportunities to enlarge or add space for
community gardens and urban agriculture in parks.
short term
(0–5 years)
1.1.6 Develop agreements to ensure access
to amenities at adjacent schools.
ongoing
1 .2 Expand existing parks and secure new parkland, where possible, to serve
growing and under-served communities in established parts of the city .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Planning, Utilities, Engineering, FC Moves
1.2.1 Secure parks and public spaces envisioned in
adopted plans—including the Downtown Plan,
Downtown Civic Center Plan, Midtown Plan, subarea
plans, and corridor plans —and ensure they provide
amenities that meet neighborhood needs.
long term
(0–20 years)
1.2.2 Tie parks and recreation facilities proposed in
adopted plans to this plan’s park and recreation
facility classification system. (See p. 115)
short term
(0–5 years)
8.2.2
1.2.3 Purchase private properties adjacent to
existing parks, when available and cost
effective, to expand existing parks.
long term
(0–20 years)
1.2.4 Ensure that new parks provided by developers are
accessible, usable, connected to citywide public space
systems, and meet design and maintenance standards.
ongoing 3.1.7, 8.2.1, 11.1.3
Implementation / 281
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
1.2.5 Reimagine City-owned stormwater utility
sites as new and expanded public space.
long term
(0–20 years)
3.1.2
1.2.6 Continue to work with business improvement
districts to provide plazas and urban parks.
ongoing
1 .3 Continue to build new parks to serve newly developing parts of the city .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Parks, Utilities/Stormwater, Natural Areas,
Engineering, Transportation, Planning
1.3.1 Complete community parks that were proposed
in the 2008 Parks and Recreation Policy Plan.
long term
(0–20 years)
1.3.2 Build additional parks in higher density areas
that are outside a 10-minute walk to parks,
natural areas, and other public spaces.
long term
(0–20 years)
1 .4 Ensure access to spaces that are intentionally designed to support casual,
impromptu use .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Parks
1.4.1 Incorporate casual use spaces into park
master plans and framework plans.
ongoing 1.1.2, 1.1.4
1 .5 Assess and augment the capacity of downtown parks and public spaces to
accommodate community events and festivals of various sizes .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Neighborhood Services, Downtown
Development Authority
1.5.1 Expand the use of festival streets and temporary street
closures during events to provide flex space for crowds.
ongoing
1.5.2 Refresh Civic Center and Washington
Parks to make them more useful and
accommodating to downtown events
medium term
(0–10 years)
1.5.3 Examine the potential of parks near downtown,
such as Lee Martinez Community Park, Old Fort
Collins Heritage Park, or Legacy Park, and the
future civic campus to function as festival and
event spaces while staying true to the objectives
of the Poudre River Downtown Master Plan.
short term
(0–5 years)
1.5.4 Consider the addition of an indoor/outdoor
venue to host larger events, offer recreation
opportunities, and increase economic health.
short term
(0–5 years)
282 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
2 . PROVIDE EQUITABLE ACCESS TO RECREATIONAL
EXPERIENCES .
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
2 .1 Provide recreational amenities according to level of service standards .
(See p . 161)
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development (outdoor
facilities), Recreation (indoor facilities)
Parks
2.1.1 Construct the new southeast recreation
center and consider two other community
or neighborhood centers to serve the
community’s indoor recreation needs.
long term
(0–20 years)
2.1.2 Identify opportunities during the periodic
evaluation of parks to add or change recreation
amenities or to enhance access based on
citywide needs and resident input.
ongoing 1.1.3
2.1.3 Consider national and regional recreation
trends, local demand, and projected usage
and participation before introducing new
and innovative amenities. (See p. 37)
ongoing
2.1.4 Based on level of service, determine where to reduce
duplication of services without reducing the overall
quality of service provided to the community.
medium term
(0–10 years)
2.1.5 Site new amenities in locations that are
or will be made accessible by as many
modes of transportation as possible.
ongoing 3.2
2.1.6 Consider renaming the Fort Collins Senior Center
to more accurately reflect its role as a community
center that—while primarily focused on those
50 years of age and older—provides a range of
facilities and programming available to all adults.
short term
(0–5 years)
Implementation / 283
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
2 .2 Expand year-round usability of existing recreation facilities .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Parks Recreation, Park Planning and Development
2.2.1 Develop a citywide, objective lighting policy
for parks and recreation facilities.
short term
(0–5 years)
2.2.2 Consider the conversion of select existing
fields to synthetic turf to extend usability.
short term
(0–5 years)
2.2.3 Consider a new indoor event/court facility to
meet local demand and level of service standards,
as proposed in the 2019 Sports Facility Market
and Feasibility Analysis. (See sidebar.)
medium term
(0–10 years)
2.2.4 Explore opportunities to provide all-season
access to certain high use facilities through the
use of temporary or permanent structures.
short term
(0–5 years)
2 .3 Strive for universal access .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Recreation Parks, Park Planning and Development
2.3.1 Continue the Adaptive Recreation
Opportunities program.
ongoing 9.2.5
2.3.2 Continue the Reduced Rate program,
and monitor its impact and usage.
ongoing 9.2.5
2.3.3 Incorporate new and creative recreation facilities
and amenities, such as playgrounds, for universal
access, offering a variety of experiences
where people of all abilities can interact.
medium term
(0–10 years)
2.3.4 Incorporate ADA (Americans with Disabilities
Act) upgrades to existing sites in accordance
with the City’s transition plan.
284 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
2 . PROVIDE EQUITABLE ACCESS TO RECREATIONAL
EXPERIENCES . (CONTINUED)
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
2 .4 Ensure facilities and programs continue to respond to changing user needs .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Recreation Parks, Park Planning and Development
2.4.1 Continue to monitor regional and national
recreation trends and incorporate new and
innovative recreation facilities and programs to
sustain community participation. (See p. 37)
ongoing
2.4.2 Evaluate opportunities to repurpose or expand
the range of allowable uses of existing facilities
before building new, specialized facilities.
ongoing
2.4.3 Promote and broaden the availability of
facilities and programs to cater to diverse
ages, interests, abilities, and cultures.
ongoing 9.2.2
2.4.4 Regularly evaluate program demand
and adjust offerings.
ongoing 2.4.5, 2.4.6
2.4.5 Implement best practices in program life cycles
to maintain a culture of quality program delivery.
(See”Program Life Cycles” on page 102)
short term
(0–5 years)
2.4.4, 2.4.6
2.4.6 Regularly evaluate each program’s
participation, finances, and outcomes.
short term
(0–5 years)
2.4.4, 2.4.5
2.4.7 Develop a new pricing policy based on
classification of programs and services.
short term
(0–5 years)
4.2.4, 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 5.3.3
2 .5 Promote public health and wellness through public spaces programming .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Recreation Community Services, Parks, Natural Areas
2.5.1 Enhance fitness, wellness, and healthy
lifestyle programming.
ongoing
2.5.2 Highlight the health and wellness benefits of
recreation programs in informational materials.
ongoing 9.2.3
2.5.3 Collaborate with local healthcare providers
on a park prescription program.
ongoing
Implementation / 285
286 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
3 . EXPAND THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK TO
SUPPORT ACCESS TO PARKS AND RECREATION .
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
3 .1 Expand the network of paved, multi-use trails .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Parks, FC Moves, Engineering
3.1.1 Continue to implement the recommendations
of the Paved Recreational Trail Master
Plan and the Bicycle Master Plan.
ongoing
3.1.2 Coordinate paved trail development with
transportation and stormwater planning.
ongoing 1.2.5
3.1.3 Ensure all existing and future community
parks and community centers are
connected to a major paved trail.
long term
(0–20 years)
3.1.4 Evaluate opportunities to create better
connections across or around current
barriers, including major arterial streets.
short term
(0–5 years)
3.2.4
3.1.5 Coordinate trail expansion with surrounding
communities and Larimer County.
ongoing
3.1.6 Pursue agreements with irrigation ditch companies to
allow trail access on or next to maintenance roads.
short term
(0–5 years)
6.2.5
3.1.7 Coordinate trail expansion with developers.ongoing 1.2.4, 8.2.1, 11.1.3
3 .2 Increase safe routes to parks and recreation facilities .2.1.5
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development FC Moves, Engineering, Planning
3.2.1 Fill gaps in sidewalks and on-street bicycle facilities
that connect parks and recreation facilities to
neighborhoods, schools, transit, and other facilities.
long term
(0–20 years)
3.2.2 Ensure transit connections to parks and
recreation facilities in the classifications
section. (See p. 115, 158)
long term
(0–20 years)
3.2.3 Consider the use of signalization, signal
prioritization, pedestrian refuges, grade
separation, and other techniques where trails
cross wide and heavily trafficked roadways.
long term
(0–20 years)
Implementation / 287
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
3.2.4 Consider physical barriers to access, and
how to avoid or overcome them, in the siting
of new parks and recreation facilities.
ongoing 3.1.4
3 .3 Ensure trails function for a range of recreational and transportation users .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Parks, FC Moves
3.3.1 Promote trail education and etiquette for both
skilled and novice users with signage or the
development of a “learn to ride” area for trails
added onto the Walk & Wheel Skills Hub.
short term
(0–5 years)
3.3.2 Collaborate with regional partners to develop
regional trail wayfinding standards, complementary
to the city’s existing wayfinding standards, that
address hierarchy, destinations, landmarks,
identity, and congestion for both recreational and
transportation users, and to be more accessible
to novice and non-English-speaking users.
short term
(0–5 years)
3.3.3 Use striping on major trails to separate traffic
moving in opposite directions, where appropriate.
ongoing
3.3.4 Ensure paved trails are wide enough for passing and
that there is enough space alongside trails to pull over.
long term
(0–20 years)
3.3.5 Where widening of trails is not possible to meet
demand due to physical, environmental, or
other constraints, consider the development of
parallel trail and complete street corridors.
long term
(0–20 years)
3.3.6 Maintain trails to defined standards to avoid
blockages caused by weather or disrepair.
long term
(0–20 years)
288 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
4 . PROTECT AND ENHANCE NATURAL, HISTORIC, AND CULTURAL
RESOURCES IN PARKS AND INCREASE RELATED ACTIVITIES .
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
4 .1 Integrate natural resources and natural resource interpretation into the
design of parks .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Parks, Natural Areas
4.1.1 Promote the planting, preservation, and
maintenance of canopy trees.
ongoing 10.3.2, 10.3.3
4.1.2 Develop horticultural standards for parks
that emphasize native and resilient plants
over mowed lawn and paved paths in areas
that are conducive to this approach.
ongoing
4.1.3 Integrate native plants and plants with high
pollinator value to increase the ecological
value and biodiversity of parks.
ongoing 7.2.5
4.1.4 Prioritize the use of raw water or other
irrigation systems that conserve water
resources and build resiliency.
ongoing 7.2.3
4.1.5 Add interpretive signage within parks to highlight
their natural resources and the benefits they provide.
ongoing
4.1.6 Explore opportunities to use public art
to interpret natural resources.
ongoing
4 .2 Develop and promote nature-based education, recreation, and training
programs .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Recreation Natural Areas, Cultural Services
4.2.1 Offer nature-based education programs
that cater to different age groups, including
young children, teens, adults, and seniors.
ongoing
4.2.2 Coordinate nature-based programs across departments
to avoid duplication of offerings and competition.
ongoing
4.2.3 Cross-promote nature-based education, recreation,
and training programs in the Recreator.
short term
(0–5 years)
4.2.4 Consider charging a nominal fee for nature-
based programs to increase the likelihood
that those who register attend.
short term
(0–5 years)
2.4.7, 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 5.3.3
Implementation / 289
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
4 .3 Optimize the care of natural resources across parks and natural areas .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Parks Natural Areas, Park Planning and
Development
4.3.1 Create a shared approach for the care
and maintenance of plantings and habitat
areas across City-owned properties.
short term
(0–5 years)
7.1.2, 10.3.4
4 .4 Capitalize on historic and cultural resources, themes, and stories in parks
and recreation facilities .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Parks, Cultural Services, Neighborhood
Services, Historic Preservation, Recreation
4.4.1 Continue to include historical and cultural
interpretative elements in new and existing parks
and recreation facilities, where appropriate.
ongoing
4.4.2 Identify critical historic and cultural resources
that may need protection and have potential
educational and interpretive components.
short term
(0–5 years)
290 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
5 . ENHANCE THE FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF PARKS AND
RECREATION .
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
5 .1 Secure sufficient funding to develop, maintain, and program parks and
recreation facilities as well as enhanced infrastructure .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Community Services Parks, Recreation, Park Planning and
Development, Finance
5.1.1 Regularly adjust capital improvement expansion
fees to cover the costs of building new parks.
ongoing
5.1.2 Explore the potential for a new capital improvement
expansion fee for recreation facilities.
short term
(0–5 years)
5.1.3 Identify a dedicated funding stream for capital
investments in existing parks and recreation facilities.
medium term
(0–10 years)
5.1.4 Identify a funding source to support park
construction and the expansion of parks and
recreation facilities in established parts of the city.
medium term
(0–10 years)
5 .2 Consider and budget for both up-front and ongoing costs and benefits in
maintenance and capital budgeting .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Community Services Finance, Parks, Recreation, Park Planning and
Development, Environmental Services
5.2.1 Identify asset management schedules and set
maintenance schedules and standards for assets
and capital facilities at the time they are approved.
ongoing
5.2.2 Plan for increases in operations and maintenance
budgets for the Parks and Recreation Departments
commensurate with additional assets and capital
facilities that they are required to operate and
maintain (e.g., enhanced infrastructure).
ongoing
Implementation / 291
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
5 .3 Continue to generate revenue from parks, recreation facilities, and
programs that can be reinvested back into these assets .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Recreation Parks, Neighborhood Services
5.3.1 Regularly update recreational fees and charges based
on a defined pricing and cost recovery philosophy.
ongoing 2.4.7, 4.2.4, 5.3.2, 5.3.3
5.3.2 Continue to set cost recovery targets for each program
area based on costs, the degree to which it provides a
public benefit, and market competition. (See p. 83)
ongoing 2.4.7, 4.2.4, 5.3.1, 5.3.3
5.3.3 Evaluate the use of additional pricing strategies—
including by residency, day of week, time of
day—to increase cost recovery. (See p. 208)
short term
(0–5 years)
2.4.7, 4.2.4, 5.3.1, 5.3.2
5.3.4 Expand the offering or permitting of concessions
in community parks, at trail-heads, and at special
events in parks and recreation facilities.
short term
(0–5 years)
5.3.5 Pursue additional revenue from special events,
such as weddings and quinceañeras, that
rent park and recreation facility spaces.
ongoing
5.3.6 Expand capacity to proactively set revenue goals,
seek revenue generating opportunities, provide a
point of contact for those looking to rent public
spaces for events, and liaise with the City’s overall
special events office and the visitor center for
the entire Community Services service area.
short term
(0–5 years)
292 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
6 . STRENGTHEN PARTNERSHIPS TO LEVERAGE RESOURCES
FOR MUTUAL BENEFIT .
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
6 .1 Strengthen partnerships between City departments .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Community Services Park Planning and Development, Parks,
Recreation, Natural Areas, Utilities,
Stormwater, Environmental Services,
Engineering, FC Moves, Transportation
6.1.1 Enable opportunities for joint projects among
the Park Planning and Development, Parks,
Recreation, Natural Areas, and Utilities
Departments; Engineering; and FC Moves.
short term
(0–5 years)
6.1.2 Develop and maintain consistent asset management
systems across the Community Services service area.
medium term
(0–10 years)
6.1.3 Consider consolidating existing department-level
marketing, communication, and partnership functions
at the Community Services service area level to
improve coordination and unify messaging.
short term
(0–5 years)
6.1.4, 9.1.1
6.1.4 Consolidate existing department-level
budgeting and finance functions at the
Community Services service area level.
short term
(0–5 years)
6.1.3, 9.1.1
6.1.5 Request boards and commissions to consider
and support multi-benefit projects.
ongoing
6 .2 Formalize and strengthen partnerships with other major providers of parks,
recreation facilities, and programs in Fort Collins and the North Front
Range .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Parks Recreation, Poudre School District, Thompson
School District, CSU, Larimer County, State
Parks, USFS
6.2.1 Develop formal intergovernmental agreements
with the Poudre School District and the Thompson
School District to ensure open access to playgrounds,
fields, courts, gyms, pools, and park areas on school
and City property when school is not in session.
short term
(0–5 years)
6.2.2 Formalize cooperative maintenance agreements
with the Poudre School District and the
Thompson School District that address where
and to what standards the City and the districts
will operate on each other’s property.
short term
(0–5 years)
Implementation / 293
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
6.2.3 Collaborate with CSU, the Poudre School
District, and the Thompson School District
to understand the recreational needs of
students and to explore joint-use facilities.
medium term
(0–10 years)
6.2.4 Coordinate with Larimer County and surrounding
communities on the provision of recreational
facilities, such as ice rinks, to prevent duplication.
ongoing
6.2.5 Pursue agreements with irrigation ditch companies to
allow trail access on or next to maintenance roads.
short term
(0–5 years)
3.1.6
6 .3 Regularly revise or create partnership agreements to ensure fair and
equitable relationships .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Community Services Parks, Recreation
6.3.1 Develop a guide to partnership agreements
to help organizations navigate the
process of becoming a partner.
short term
(0–5 years)
6.3.2 Assign a staff liaison for each partner to
improve communication and collaboration.
short term
(0–5 years)
6.3.3 Track and regularly share information and
measurable outcomes of partnership agreements.
ongoing
6 .4 Support and strengthen resident opportunities for involvement,
volunteerism and giving in support of parks, recreation, and trails .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Community Services Parks, Recreation, City Give, Volunteer
Services
6.4.1 Identify a diverse range of strategies for
increasing resident engagement, and the
giving of time, talent and treasure.
ongoing
6.4.2 Encourage workplace giving programs— from volunteer
events to community campaigns— with companies,
institutions, nonprofits and large organizations.
ongoing
6.4.3 Facilitate volunteerism and resident
engagement throughout citywide events.
ongoing
294 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
7 . ENSURE PARKS, PAVED TRAILS, AND RECREATION
FACILITIES ARE OPERATED AND MAINTAINED EFFICIENTLY
AND TO DEFINED STANDARDS .
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
7 .1 Ensure maintenance standards are clear and consistently implemented .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Parks Recreation, Natural Areas, Operation
Services, Utilities, Park Planning and
Development
7.1.1 Encourage cross-departmental knowledge
sharing and training on maintenance practices.
ongoing
7.1.2 Develop unified standards across the departments
that manage the city’s public spaces for maintaining
similar types of spaces and facilities.
short term
(0–5 years)
4.3.1, 10.3.4
7.1.3 Define and regularly update maintenance standards
for each park and recreation facility classification
and trails, taking into account usage and visibility.
short term
(0–5 years)
7.1.4 Consider assignment of maintenance responsibilities
across departments and property lines to cater to
each department’s strengths and knowledgebase,
increase efficiency, and enhance the user experience.
short term
(0–5 years)
7.1.5 Identify opportunities to share maintenance
responsibilities with partner organizations and
groups for efficiency, using formalized agreements.
short term
(0–5 years)
7.1.6 Ensure maintenance safety checklists
include obstacles to universal access.
short term
(0–5 years)
Implementation / 295
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
7 .2 Strengthen sustainability policies and practices .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Parks Recreation, Natural Areas, Operation
Services, Environmental Services, Park
Planning and Development, Sustainability
Services
7.2.1 Target waste reduction, recycling, reduced
greenhouse gas emissions, reduced energy
usage, reduced water consumption, and light
pollution for increasing sustainable practices.
short term
(0–5 years)
7.2.2 Take climate change predictions into account
in the design of parks and facilities and in
maintenance and operations practices.
ongoing
7.2.3 Continue to identify sustainable
water sources for irrigation.
ongoing 4.1.4
7.2.4 Conduct pilot projects to test
effectiveness for citywide usage.
ongoing
7.2.5 Continue to prioritize biodiversity and emphasize
native and water-wise plants over non-native species.
ongoing 4.1.3
7.2.6 Remove invasive species. ongoing
7.2.7 Use environmentally friendly products (e.g., cleaners
and chemical treatments) where feasible.
ongoing
7.2.8 Provide training for staff on how to include
sustainability in evaluating costs and benefits.
ongoing
7.2.9 Develop outreach and education
programs on sustainable practices.
short term
(0–5 years)
7.2.10 Continue to pursue environmental certification,
such as LEED or SITES, of parks and facilities.
ongoing
296 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
8 . PROMOTE THE SYNERGY BETWEEN PARKS, RECREATION,
AND ECONOMIC HEALTH .
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
8 .1 Provide amenities for residents while unlocking recreation tourism
potential .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Recreation Visit Fort Collins, Fort Collins Chamber of
Commerce
8.1.1 Revisit and reframe the added tourism
benefits of parks and recreation facilities built
primarily to meet residents’ needs—including
event spaces and sports complexes.
short term
(0–5 years)
8.1.2 Support the development of citywide
tourist infrastructure—including hotel rooms
and food and beverage establishments—
near parks and recreation facilities.
medium term
(0–10 years)
8.1.3 Collaborate with Visit Fort Collins, the Fort Collins
Chamber of Commerce, and other organizations to
market parks and recreation facilities as destinations for
residents and visitors from the city, region, and beyond.
ongoing
8 .2 Encourage new park- and recreation-oriented development or
redevelopment to capitalize on the economic value of parks, trails, and
recreation facilities .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Planning
8.2.1 Guide developers during the development review
process to ensure development interfaces with
adjacent parks, trails, and recreation facilities.
ongoing 1.2.4, 3.1.7, 11.1.3
8.2.2 Develop land use, subarea plans, and corridor
plans that encourage park- and recreation-
oriented development or redevelopment.
ongoing 1.2.2
8.2.3 Pursue public-private partnerships for mutual
benefit and to stretch public dollars.
ongoing
Implementation / 297
298 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
9 . IMPROVE MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION TO ENHANCE
OPERATIONS AND USER SATISFACTION .
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
9 .1 Promote parks and recreation as part of a unified public space system .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Community Services Parks, Recreation, Park Planning and
Development, Natural Areas, Streets, Utilities,
School Districts
9.1.1 Consider consolidating existing department-
level marketing and communication functions at
the Community Services service area level.
short term
(0–5 years)
6.1.3, 6.1.4
9.1.2 Create new maps and guides with a
universal graphic style for parks, trails,
recreation facilities, and natural areas.
short term
(0–5 years)
9 .2 Update and develop new marketing and communication materials that
increase awareness and highlight the benefits of parks, trails, recreation
facilities, and programs .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Community Services Parks, Recreation, Park Planning and
Development, Natural Areas, Cultural
Services
9.2.1 Ensure communication materials and signage
use consistent language to refer to parks
and facilities of different classifications.
short term
(0–5 years)
9.2.2 Develop materials that communicate the full range
of facilities and experiences available across the
city to all residents, workers, and visitors.
short term
(0–5 years)
2.4.3
9.2.3 Highlight the environmental, social, economic,
and wellness benefits of parks, trails,
recreation facilities, and programs.
ongoing 2.5.2
9.2.4 Highlight facilities with natural and historic
resources in marketing materials.
ongoing
9.2.5 Communicate the availability of physically and
financially accessible facilities and programs.
ongoing 2.3.1, 2.3.2
9.2.6 Ensure materials are written in relatable
language and are accessible to non-English
speakers and the visually impaired.
ongoing
9.2.7 Explore expanded use of technology and
digital platforms to disseminate information
about parks, recreation, and trails and
to enhance the user experience.
ongoing
9.2.8 Provide more robust information on each park, trail,
recreation facility, and program on the City’s website.
ongoing
Implementation / 299
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
9 .3 Regularly measure and report on the progress of Master Plan
implementation .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Community Services Parks, Recreation, Park Planning and
Development
9.3.1 Produce an annual report on Park and
Recreation operations, including progress
on Master Plan implementation.
long term
(0–20 years)
9 .4 Engage users, partners, and staff in the planning, development,
programming, and maintenance of parks and recreation facilities .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Community Services Parks, Recreation, Park Planning and
Development, Natural Areas
9.4.1 Conduct a needs assessment, including
a statistically valid survey and level of
service analysis, at least every 5 years.
ongoing
9.4.2 Use inclusive, transparent, and creative
engagement practices that encourage
participation by all community members.
ongoing
9.4.3 Engage users on an ongoing basis to evaluate
the success of parks, trails, recreation facilities,
and programs to establish a meaningful feedback
loop between the City and residents.
ongoing
9.4.4 Proactively engage communities adjacent to parks and
recreation facilities about the benefits of programs and
facilities to inspire users to participate more often.
ongoing
9.4.5 Engage communities in the master planning of
new or refreshed parks and recreation facilities,
including historically marginalized voices.
ongoing
9.4.6 Monitor and evaluate trends in engagement
tools and platforms that can increase
users’ interaction with the City.
ongoing
9.4.7 Use online and social media regularly to inform
and solicit feedback from residents.
ongoing
300 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
10 . ELEVATE THE DESIGN OF AND CONNECTION TO NATURE
IN PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES .
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
10 .1 Develop a unified design language for parks and recreation facilities that is
flexible enough to allow for individualized park identities .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Parks, Recreation
10.1.1 Identify elements, such as signage, lighting,
and plantings, that can be standardized across
all parks and recreation facilities to increase
efficiency and create a cohesive identity.
short term
(0–5 years)
10.1.2 Standardize the design language of structures
and equipment across schoolside parks,
neighborhood parks, mini parks, and urban parks.
short term
(0–5 years)
10.1.3 Develop a design framework for community
parks and recreation facilities that is cohesive but
flexible enough to allow for individual identities.
short term
(0–5 years)
10 .2 Strive for design excellence in the development and refresh of parks and
recreation facilities .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Parks, Recreation
10.2.1 Use this plan’s design guidelines as a
reference in designing or refreshing parks
and recreation facilities. (See p. 105)
ongoing
10.2.2 Study and visit award winning parks and
recreation facilities to keep up to date
on successful design solutions.
ongoing
10.2.3 Partner with local and nationally recognized
designers to add different design perspectives.
ongoing
10.2.4 Incorporate best practices in park
and recreation planning, design, and
operation from other park systems.
ongoing
10.2.5 Pursue state and national awards from organizations
such as the Colorado Parks & Recreation Association
(CPRA), the National Recreation and Park Association
(NRPA), the American Institute of Architects (AIA), the
American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA),
and the American Planning Association (APA).
ongoing
Implementation / 301
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
10 .3 Promote the planting, preservation, and maintenance of canopy trees and
native vegetation on public and private land .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Parks Park Planning and Development, Natural
Areas
10.3.1 Practice sound arboriculture practices, including
diversification of species; monitoring and
managing insect and disease impacts; and
preparing for unanticipated events, such as
extreme weather, and climate change.
ongoing
10.3.2 Replace every tree that is removed from maintained
areas to create adequate canopy cover and to
maximize the benefits of the urban forest.
ongoing 4.1.1, 10.3.3
10.3.3 Protect existing trees when new parks and recreation
facilities are in development, or when existing parks
and recreation facilities are maintained or refreshed.
ongoing 4.1.1, 10.3.2
10.3.4 Continue to maintain and enhance natural resources
in accordance with the Natural Areas Master Plan.
ongoing 4.3.1, 7.1.2
10 .4 Incorporate public art, including landscape-based art and functional art,
into parks and recreation facilities .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Park Planning and Development Parks, Cultural Services, Recreation
10.4.1 Develop a master plan for art in parks that
addresses selection of artists, provision of design
parameters for artists, and other guidance specific
to working with artists on parks, recreation, and trail
projects in order to enrich the user experience.
medium term
(0–10 years)
10.4.2 Integrate public art design and installation
timelines with overall park and recreation
facility design and construction timelines.
ongoing
302 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
11 . CONTINUE TO ENHANCE SAFETY AND SECURITY IN ALL
PARKS AND FACILITIES .
Actions / Methods Time Frame
Related
Actions / Methods
11 .1 Ensure adequate “eyes on the street” around and in parks and recreation
facilities .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Parks Park Planning and Development, Planning,
Safety and Risk Management
11.1.1 Expand the park ranger program to reduce
the area each ranger has to patrol.
short term
(0–5 years)
11.1.2 Consider developing a Park Ambassador program
akin to the Natural Areas Volunteer Ranger
Assistant program to increase resident presence
and encourage rule enforcement in parks.
short term
(0–5 years)
11.1.3 Encourage new development to face, rather than turn
its back, to parks and recreation facilities. (See p. 105)
ongoing 1.2.4, 3.1.7, 8.2.1
11.1.4 Work to avoid or eliminate “backs” of
parks and recreation facilities.
ongoing
11 .2 Update guidelines and policies on safety and security .
Implementation Lead Implementation Partners
Parks Park Planning and Development, Homeward
Alliance, Safety and Risk Management
11.2.1 Incorporate Crime Prevention through Environmental
Design (CPTED) principles into design standards.
short term
(0–5 years)
11.2.2 Continue to provide safety training for all staff
who work in parks and recreation facilities.
ongoing
11.2.3 Collaborate with local providers, such as
Homeward Alliance, to connect those in
parks who are experiencing homelessness
to available resources and services.
ongoing
Implementation / 303
304 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Implementation / 305
FUNDING
In order to continue to build and maintain parks and
recreation facilities, fiscally sustainable and realistic
funding sources are essential. A diversified approach
is necessary. This plan includes realistic and diverse
funding options for the City to consider moving forward.
306 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
TOTAL COST OF
OWNERSHIP
It is critically important to view the financial sustainability of parks
and recreation through the concept of “total cost of ownership.”
Total cost of ownership refers to total cost to build, operate,
maintain, and update parks and recreation facilities.
The maintenance of current assets and their periodic replacement
at the end of their life cycles must be balanced with the refresh of
existing parks and facilities and the development of new parks and
facilities. Maintaining current infrastructure with limited funding will
inhibit the City’s ability to take care of all existing assets and build
new facilities.
Operations and Maintenance
Operations and maintenance refer to the daily tasks needed to keep
parks and recreation facilities running and minor repairs to capital
assets to keep them in a good state of repair.
Capital Investment
Capital investment encompasses life cycle replacement, park and
facility refreshes, and new parks and facilities. It is assumed that all
capital investments are:
• financially viable
• likely to be implemented within the period they are budgeted for
• consistent with other planning efforts
Life Cycle Replacement
Life cycle replacement includes critical maintenance projects or
repair of existing assets—when regular maintenance can no longer
keep them in a good state of repair—safety and ADA (Americans
with Disabilities Act) improvements, and existing debt service
obligations. Many of these types of improvements typically require
one-time funding and are not likely to increase annual operations
and maintenance costs. In many cases, these types of projects may
reduce annual operations and maintenance costs.
Minor Refresh
Minor refreshes include strategic changes to existing parks
or recreation facilities to better meet the unmet needs of the
community, including adding features such as play fields, shade
structures, adult fitness equipment, covered picnic shelters, and
trail loops to extend recreation opportunities. Minor refreshes may
also include a refresh of plantings or other design elements within
the framework of an existing, relevant site master plan. These
types of improvements typically require one-time funding and may
trigger slight increases in annual operations and maintenance costs,
depending on the nature of the improvements.
Implementation / 307
Major Refresh/New
Major refreshes and new parks and recreation facilities may both
involve land acquisition, new site master planning, and development
of new infrastructure and amenities in concert with new master plan.
These improvements are likely to increase annual operations and
maintenance costs.
Total Cost
of Ownership
Operations and
Maintenance
Life Cycle
Replacement
Minor
Refresh
Major
Refresh
New
Parks and
Facilities=+++
Capital Investment
Existing Funding
Parks $12.3M $0.5M $239.0M
Recreation $11.3M $14.0M
Total $23 .6M $0 .0M $0 .0M $0 .0M $253 .0M
Needed Funding
Parks $13.3M $6.0M $2.7M $54.3M $239.0M
Mini Parks $0.2M $2.5M $0.8M
Plazas $0.1M $0.6M
Urban Parks $1.7M $3.0M
Neighborhood Parks $0.5M $2.0M $5.5M $107.0M
Schoolside Parks $1.0M $0.5M $16.5M $32.2M
Community Parks $3.9M $27.5M $96.0M
Special Use Parks $0.5M
Recreation $11.3M $0.1M $2.2M $49.5M $66.0M
Planting Refresh $0.6M
Total $24 .6M $6 .1M $5 .5M $103 .8M $305 .0M
Funding Gap
Parks $1.0M $5.5M $2.7M $54.3M
Recreation $0.0M $0.1M $2.2M $49.5M $52.0M
Planting Refresh $0.6M
Total $1 .0M $5 .6M $5 .5M $103 .8M $52 .0M
Figure 21. While existing operations and maintenance budgets are close to what is needed, there are no dedicated funding
sources for capital investment.
Estimate of Funding Needed for Parks and Recreation
These estimates are provided in 2020 dollars and the current annual inflationary increase of construction costs is approximately 5%
308 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Revenue Generation Potential
Feasibility
CAPITAL INVESTMENT
FUNDING SOURCES
Primary Funding Sources
Capital Improvement Reserve Funds
Many park and recreation systems add a capital improvement fee
onto an existing user fee when they develop or enhance major
recreation facilities. This is usually applied to golf courses, aquatic
facilities, recreation centers, ice rinks, amphitheaters, and special
use facilities like sports complexes. The dollars gained either offset
the cost of the capital improvement or the revenue bond that was
used to develop or enhance the special-use facility. Once the capital
improvement is paid off, the fee typically expires and is discontinued.
Another use of a capital improvement reserve fund is to dedicate
a portion of user fees for the purpose of contributing to the life
cycle replacement of park and recreation facilities. The fee allows
participants of specific programs an opportunity to contribute
toward the upkeep of the facilities being used.
Developer Impact Fees (Capital Expansion Fees)
Many municipalities seek developer contributions for parklands
and for the development of trails that run through the property
being developed. The developer perceives the enhanced value
such improvements mean for her or his development. Park or trail
dedication as a requirement of subdivision development is a reliable
means for maintaining equity of access to parks and trails.
• Capital Improvement
Reserve Funds
• Developer Impact Fees
• Dedicated Sales Tax
• PID/TIF District
• Grants • Advertising Sales
• Joint Use Agreements
• Property Taxes
• Food and Beverage Taxes
• Hotel and Restaurant Taxes
• Service Tax
• Private Development • Easements
• Metro Districts • CDBG Funding
• Land Trusts
• Greenway Utilities
HIGHER
HIGHER
LOWER
LOWER
Figure 22. Capital investment reserve funds,
developer impact fees, a dedicated sales tax,
and PID/TIF districts are the funding sources for
capital investments that are most feasible and
have the highest revenue generation potential
for Fort Collins.
Capital Investment Funding Sources by Revenue
Generation Potential and Feasibility
Implementation / 309
Dedicated Sales Tax
An additional percentage sales tax that is committed to constructing
park sites, infrastructure, recreational fields, and trails has the
advantage of collecting revenues from both residents and non-
residents who conduct business in Fort Collins.
Public Improvement or Tax Increment Financing
District
Commonly used for financing redevelopment projects, a Public
Improvement District (PID) or Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
District involves the issuance of tax-exempt bonds to pay for front-
end infrastructure and eligible development costs in partnership
with private developers and local businesses that benefit from the
improvement. As development occurs, the “tax increment” resulting
from redevelopment projects is used to retire the debt that was
issued to fund the eligible redevelopment costs. The public portion
of the redevelopment project funds itself using the additional taxes
generated by the project. PIDs or TIFs can be used to fund park
improvements and development as an essential infrastructure cost.
This approach works well in downtown redevelopment, regional park
improvements, and in trail development.
Grants
The grant market continues to grow annually. Grant writers and
researchers are essential to pursue grants. Matching dollars are
required for most federal grants and many state grants.
Advertising Sales
Advertising can occur with trash cans, playgrounds, dog parks, trails,
flower pots, and as part of special events to pay for operational
costs.
Joint Use Agreements
Joint use agreements are contractual relationships entered into
between two or more local units of government or between a local
unit of government and a non-profit organization for the joint usage
and development of sports fields, regional parks, or other facilities.
310 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Secondary Funding Sources
Property Taxes
Ad valorem taxes on real property may be committed to
constructing park sites, infrastructure, fields, and trails.
Food and Beverage Taxes
This sales tax is used by many cities across the United States and
usually requires voter approval. The taxes are paid by the local
community as well as visitors to the city to help pay for a bond to
finance future park and recreation related improvements.
Usually associated with convention and tourism bureaus, parks and
recreation agencies may receive a portion of this funding for capital
expenses because they manage many tourist attractions.
Hotel and Restaurant Taxes
Taxes based on gross receipts from charges and meal services
may be used to build and operate sports fields, regional parks,
golf courses, tennis courts, and other special park and recreation
facilities.
Service Tax
Service tax is a tax levied by a local government on service providers
on certain service transactions, but is actually borne by customers.
The consumer pays the tax to the service provider while paying
the bill. The government in turn collects the tax from the service
providers. Funding generated by a tax on services can be utilized for
both operational and capital expenditures. The utilization of funds is
usually defined when the tax is first introduced.
Private Development
Developers may lease space from City-owned land through
a subordinate lease that pays out a set dollar amount plus a
percentage of gross dollars for recreation enhancements. These
could include a golf course, marina, restaurants, driving ranges,
sports complexes, equestrian facilities, recreation centers, and ice
arenas.
Easements
This revenue source is available when the City allows utility
companies, businesses, or individuals to develop an improvement
above or below ground on public property for a set period of time
and a set dollar amount to be received by the City on an annual
basis.
Implementation / 311
Other Funding Sources
Metro Districts
Metropolitan districts are quasi-governmental entities with taxing
authority that are used to finance necessary public infrastructure and
services that the City cannot otherwise provide. A metro district is a
type of special district derived from Colorado’s Special District Act
(Title 32, Article 1, Colorado Revised Statutes).
Community Development Block Grant Funding
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are used
by many cities to enhance parks. These funds should be used to
support the refresh of major facilities based on their location in
the city and that may do to enhance nearby neighborhoods and
schools—which is the intended purpose of CDBG funds.
Land Trusts
Many systems have developed land trusts to help secure and fund
the cost for acquiring land that needs to be preserved and protected
for greenway purposes. This could be a good source to look to for
acquisition of future lands.
Greenway Utilities
Greenway utilities are used to finance acquisition of greenways and
development of the greenways by selling the development rights
underground to fiber optic or other businesses.
OPERATIONS AND
MAINTENANCE FUNDING
SOURCES
Primary Funding Sources
Dedicated Sales Tax
An additional percentage sales tax that is committed to constructing
park sites, infrastructure, recreational fields, and trails has the
advantage of collecting revenues from both residents and non-
residents who conduct business in Fort Collins.
Ticket Sales/Admissions/User Fees
This revenue source comes from accessing facilities for self-
directed activities such as pools, ice skating rinks, ballparks, and
entertainment facilities and helps to offset operational costs.
312 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Special Use Permits
Special use permits allow individuals to use specific park property
for financial gain. The City either receives a set amount of money or
a percentage of the gross service that is being provided.
Reservations
This revenue source comes from the right to reserve specific public
property for a set amount of time. The reservation rates are usually
set and apply to group picnic shelters, meeting rooms for weddings,
reunions, and outings or other types of facilities for special activities.
Equipment Rentals
The revenue source is available on the rental of equipment such as
tables, chairs, tents, stages, bicycles, ice skates, or roller blades that
are used for recreation purposes.
Private Management
Private management involves contracting with a private business
to provide and operate desirable recreational activities financed,
constructed, and operated by the private sector, with additional
compensation paid to the City.
Revenue Generation Potential
Feasibility
• Dedicated Sales Tax
• Ticket Sales/Admissions
• Special Use Permits
• Reservations
• Equipment Rentals
• Private Management
• Partnerships • Charitable Support
• Concession Management
• Property Taxes
• Food and Beverage Taxes
• Hotel and Restaurant Taxes
• Service Tax
• Corporate Sponsorships • Catering Permits
• Pouring Rights
HIGHER
HIGHER
LOWER
LOWER
Figure 23. A dedicated sales tax, ticket sales/
admissions, special use permits, reservations,
equipment rentals, and private management
are the funding sources for operations and
maintenance that are most feasible and have the
highest revenue generation potential for Fort
Collins.
Operations and Maintenance Funding Sources by
Revenue Generation Potential and Feasibility
Implementation / 313
Partnerships
Partnerships are joint-development funding sources or operational
funding sources formed between separate agencies, such as two
government entities, a non-profit and a public agency, or a private
business and a public agency. Partners jointly develop revenue-
producing park and recreation facilities and share risk, operational
costs, responsibilities, and asset management based on the strengths
of each partner. (See p. 317.)
Friends Groups and Support Leagues
Friends groups and support leagues deepen public support and
community value for specific parks or facilities, and benefit the
City by leveraging the work and scope of City services through
stewardship, time, passion, fundraising, membership programs,
“friend raising” and advocacy.
Charitable Support
Community needs are always deeper than any City’s budget.
Charitable gifts are a vehicle to expand and enrich City programs
and services: from youth recreation to neighborhood park
improvements, from turban gardens to the preservation of open
spaces.
The City’s “in-house” philanthropic services, City Give, creates a
formalized structure to respond to strategic projects and community
needs that fall outside the normal city budget priorities but are well-
positioned for private funding.
Donations, aligned with parks and recreations priorities and strategic
objectives, generously benefit specific parks, trail segments, facilities,
and community programs.
City Give’s transparent, non-partisan governance structure upholds
the public’s trust in our ability to honor donor intent and make
meaningful investments in our community.
Charitable support for parks and recreation includes cash and non-
cash contributions from individuals, businesses, financial institutions,
Donor Advised Funds, community fundraisers and event sponsors.
Public support of parks, facilities and trials can also be made through
donations of real estate, securities, bequests and real property.
Concession Management
Concession management is from retail sales or rentals of soft goods,
hard goods, or consumable items. The City either contracts for the
service or receives a set amount of the gross percentage or the full
revenue dollars that incorporates a profit after expenses.
314 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Secondary Funding Sources
Property Taxes
Ad valorem taxes on real property may be committed to maintaining
park sites, infrastructure, fields, and trails.
Food and Beverage Taxes
This sales tax is used by many cities across the United States and
usually requires voter approval. The taxes are paid by the local
community as well as visitors to the city to help pay for a bond to
finance future park and recreation related improvements.
Usually associated with convention and tourism bureaus, parks and
recreation agencies may receive a portion of this funding for capital
expenses because they manage many tourist attractions.
Hotel and Restaurant Taxes
Taxes based on gross receipts from charges and meal services
may be used to build and operate sports fields, regional parks,
golf courses, tennis courts, and other special park and recreation
facilities.
Service Tax
Service tax is a tax levied by a local government on service providers
on certain service transactions, but is actually borne by customers.
The consumer pays the tax to the service provider while paying
the bill. The government in turn collects the tax from the service
providers. Funding generated by a tax on services can be utilized for
both operational and capital expenditures. The utilization of funds is
usually defined when the tax is first introduced.
Corporate Sponsorships
Corporations can underwrite a portion or all of the cost of an event,
program, or activity in exchange for their name being associated
with the service. Sponsorships typically are title sponsors, presenting
sponsors, associate sponsors, product sponsors, or in-kind sponsors.
Many agencies seek corporate support for these types of activities.
Catering Permits
This allows caterers to work in the park-and-recreation system on a
permit basis with a set fee or a percentage of food sales returning
to the city. Many parks and recreation agencies have their own
catering-service contracts and receive a percentage (10–15%) from
the sale of food and drinks. This may be most suitable for large or
special events occurring on publicly-owned properties. Another form
of fee income is the temporary business license.Multiple funding sources may come together to
support special events.
Open Streets
Implementation / 315
Other Funding Sources
Pouring Rights
Pouring rights are agreements between private soft drink companies
and the City to have exclusive rights to serve their products within
parks and facilities. A portion of the gross sales goes back to the
City.
316 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Implementation / 317
PARTNERSHIPS
Fort Collins has a long history of partnerships with
many organizations. As expected by a system that has
achieved the Commission on Parks and Recreation
Agencies Accreditation, Fort Collins has managed
these partnerships at a best practice level, including the
development of formalized agreements. The following
guidelines can be used when updating current and
developing new partnership agreements in the future.
The 4th of July Parade brings residents, business, and
organizations together.
4th of July Fort Collins
318 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
TYPES OF PARTNERSHIPS
While not an exhaustive list of potential partnerships, there are five
typical types of partners.
Operational Partners
Partners who help maintain facilities and assets, promote amenities
and site usage, support site needs, provide programs and events,
and/or maintain the integrity of a facility through labor, equipment,
or materials.
Vendor Partners
Service providers and/or contractors who can gain brand association
and recognition as a preferred vendor or supporter in exchange for
reduced rates, services, or another agreed upon benefit.
Service Partners
Nonprofit organizations and/or friends groups that support efforts
to provide programs and events, advocacy and education, and/or
collaboratively serve specific constituents in the community.
Co-Branding Partners
Private organizations that can gain brand association and
recognition as a supporter in exchange for sponsorship or co-
branded programs, events, marketing, promotional campaigns, and/
or advertising opportunities.
Philanthropic Partnerships
The City seeks to engage philanthropic partnerships, not as financial
resources, but as stakeholders in the organizational mission of
parks and recreation. Beyond filling a gap in municipal services,
cross-sector partnerships increase collaboration, cultivate civic
engagement, nurture inclusiveness, and financially support mutually
agreed upon strategic initiatives.
Philanthropic partners can include corporations, churches, grant-
making organizations, passionate community advocates, mission-
driven organizations, nonprofits and other public service institutions.
Implementation / 319
SUCCESSFUL
PARTNERSHIPS
The key to any successful partnership is for each partner to bring
value. This may take the form of operational revenue, capital
revenue to construct a facility, or enhanced visitation and user group
participation. The key to effective partnerships is not to create an
entitled partner dependent on the City to support their users’ needs,
but instead one that contributes to the value of the project.
Partnerships should follow these principles to be effective.
• Common values: trust, respect, honesty, and identifiable “way
of work” behaviors such as collaboration, respect for each
other’s expertise, decision making protocols, and recognition for
contributions to the partnership.
• Complementary nature of the City’s and partner’s competencies
and capacities, enhancing each other’s work and role.
• Shared goals and outcomes that identify and describe success.
• Agreed upon financial outcomes. For partnerships in a
facility, financial outcomes for the facility as a whole should
be prioritized over individual spaces. All spaces should be
considered shared space and prioritized on a prime/non-prime
time basis, based on individual partners’ needs, and should be
available to any partner who is part of making the whole facility
a success.
• Clarity of roles, responsibilities, timelines, money involved in
capital and operational costs, and deliverables to the community
based on an agreed-to operating pro-forma and capital cost
investment. The pro-forma should be updated annually for
clarity.
• Evaluation and, ultimately, celebration of success.
EXAMPLE PARTNERSHIP
COMPONENTS
Vision Statement
Parks, trails, and recreation facilities in Fort Collins are an
invitation to all community members to sustain and build wellness,
curiosity, innovation, and community—as part of the city’s iconic,
interconnected network of public space.
Purpose
This policy is designed to guide the process for the City in its desire
to partner with private, nonprofit, or other governmental entities for
the redevelopment, design, construction, and/or operation of the
facility.
320 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Fort Collins would like to identify for-profit, nonprofit, and
governmental entities that are interested in proposing to partner
with the City to construct a new facility. A major component in
exploring any potential partnership will be to identify additional
collaborating partners that may help provide a synergistic working
relationship in terms of resources, community contributions,
knowledge, and political sensitivity. These partnerships should be
mutually beneficial for all proposing partners including the City, and
particularly beneficial for the citizens of Fort Collins.
Issues to Be Addressed
Fort Collins has developed partnerships over many years that
have helped to support the management of parks and recreation
facilities and programs services, while also providing educational
and recreational opportunities for the citizens of Fort Collins. The
recommended policy will promote fairness and equity within the
existing and future partnerships, while helping staff to manage
against what may cause conflicts internally and externally. Certain
partnership guidelines must be adopted by the City of Fort Collins
for existing and future partnerships to work effectively. These
partnership guidelines are as follows:
• All partnerships will require an upfront presentation to the
City of Fort Collins that describes the reason for creation of
the partnership and establishes an outcome that benefits each
partner’s involvement.
• All partnerships will require a working agreement with
measurable outcomes that hold each partner accountable to the
outcomes desired and to each other and will be evaluated on a
yearly basis with reports back to the City on the outcomes of the
partnership and how equitable the partnership remains.
• All partnerships will track direct and indirect costs associated
with the partnership investment to demonstrate the level of
equity each partner is investing.
• Each partner will not treat one another as a client-to-client
relationship, but will create a partnership culture that focuses
on planning together on a yearly basis or as appropriate;
communicating weekly/or monthly on how the partnership is
working; and annually reporting to each other’s board or owners
on how well the partnership is working, and the results of their
efforts to the taxpayers of Fort Collins.
• Full disclosure by both partners to each other will be made
available when issues arise.
• Annual informing of each other’s staff on the respective
partner’s values, yearly goals, and work plans so both partners
are in tune with issues the partners may be dealing with that
could affect the partnership policy or agreement as it applies to
finances, staffing, capital costs, political elements, or changes in
operating philosophies.
Implementation / 321
Expected Outcomes and Benefits
• Increased visibility.
• Increase in services and programs.
• Tax dollars spent on services are maximized through
collaboration.
• Public belief in and support of the role of the City in
partnerships.
• Promotes a positive image.
• Public involvement enriches their understanding of the City.
• Engaged public enhances current and future development of
programs and facilities.
• Provides alternatives for manpower, recreation sites, financial
resources, supplies, materials, etc. for a more comprehensive
system.
• Shared vision and goals.
• Allow the City the opportunity to make a vision a reality.
• Reach more people, provide more services, reduce expenditures,
and generate more revenue.
• Eliminates duplication of efforts, strengthen communities, and
achieve greater outcomes.
Guiding Procedures
Public/Public Partnerships
The policy for public/public partnerships is evident with the City
based on their working with the Poudre and Thompson School
Districts in Fort Collins. Working together on the development,
sharing, and/or operating of parks and recreation facilities and
programs will be as follows:
• Each partner will meet with Fort Collins Parks and Recreation
staff annually to plan and share activity-based costs and equity
invested by each partner in the partnership.
• Partners will establish measurable outcomes and work through
key issues to focus on the coming year between each partner to
meet the desired outcomes.
• Each partner will focus on meeting a balance of 50% equity
for each agreed-to partnership and will track investment costs
accordingly.
• Each partner will assign a liaison to serve each partnership
agency for communication and planning purposes.
• Measurable outcomes will be reviewed quarterly and shared with
each partner, with adjustments made as needed.
• Each partner will act as an agent for the other partner, thinking
collectively as one rather than two separate agencies for
purposes of the agreement.
322 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
• Each partner will meet with the other partner’s respective board
or owner annually to share results of the partnership agreement.
• A working partnership agreement will be developed and
monitored together on a quarterly or as-needed basis.
• If conflicts arise between partners, the City’s Parks or Recreation
Director will meet with the partner’s highest ranking officer to
resolve the partnership issue. It should be resolved at the highest
level or the partnership will be dissolved.
• No exchange of money between partners will be made until the
end of the partnership year. A running credit will be established
that can be settled at the end of the planning year with one
check or will be carried over to the following year as a credit
with adjustments made to the working agreement to meet the
equity level desired.
Public/Nonprofit Partnerships
The partnership policy for public/not-for-profit partnerships with the
City and the not-for-profit community of service providers is seen in
associations working together in the development and management
of facilities and programs. These principles are as follows:
• The not-for-profit partner agency or group involved with the City
must first recognize that they are in a partnership with the City
to provide a public service or good; conversely, the City must
manage the partnership in the best interest of the community as
a whole, not in the best interest of the not-for-profit agency.
• The partnership working agreement will be year-to-year
and evaluated based on the outcomes determined for the
partnership agencies or groups during the planning process at
the start of the partnership year. At the planning workshop, each
partner will share their needs for the partnership and outcomes
desired. Each partner will outline their level of investment in the
partnership as it applies to money, people, time, equipment,
and the amount of capital investment they will make in the
partnership for the coming year.
• Each partner will focus on meeting a balance of 50% equity or
as negotiated and agreed upon as established in the planning
session with the City. Each partner will demonstrate to the other
the method each will use to track costs, how it will be reported
on a monthly basis, and any revenue earned.
• Each partner will appoint a liaison to serve each partnering
agency for communication purposes.
• Measurable outcomes will be reviewed quarterly and shared with
each partner, with adjustments made, as needed.
• Each partner will act as an agent for the other partner to think
collectively as one, not two separate agencies. Items such as
financial information will be shared if requested by either partner
when requested to support a better understanding of the
resources available to the partnership.
Implementation / 323
• Each partner will meet the other’s respective board on a yearly
basis to share results of the partnership agreement.
• If conflicts should arise during the partnership year, the City’s
Parks or Recreation Director and the highest-ranking officer of
the not-for-profit agency will meet to resolve the issue.
• It should be resolved at this level or the partnership will be
dissolved. No other course of action will be allowed by either
partner.
• Financial payments by the not-for-profit agency will be made
monthly to City as outlined in the working agreement to meet
the 50% equity level of the partnership.
Public/Private Partnerships
The policy for public/private partnerships is relevant to the City
and could include businesses, private groups, private associations,
or individuals who desires to make a profit from use of a City
facility or programs. It would also be evident if the business, group,
association, or individual who wishes to develop a facility on park
property, to provide a service on City-owned property, or who has
a contract with the City to provide a task or service on City-owned
facilities. The partnership principles are as follows:
• Upon entering into an agreement with a private business, group,
association or individual, the City must recognize that the entity
is entitled to make a profit.
• In developing a public/private partnership, the City, as well as the
private partner will enjoy a designated fee from the contracting
agency, or a designated fee plus a percentage of gross dollars
less sales tax on a monthly, quarterly, or yearly basis, as outlined
in the contract agreement.
• In developing a public/private partnership, the City and
contracted partners will establish a set of measurable outcomes
to be achieved. A tracking method of those outcomes will be
established and monitored by the City. The outcomes will include
standards of quality, financial reports, customer satisfaction,
payments to the City, and overall coordination with the City for
the services rendered.
• Depending on the level of investment made by the private
contractor, the partnership agreement can be limited to months,
a year, or multiple years.
• The private contractor will provide on a yearly basis a working
management plan they will follow to ensure the outcomes
desired by the City to achieve the goals of the partnership set
out in the partnership recital. The work management plan can
and will be negotiated, if necessary. Monitoring of the work
management plan will be the responsibility of both partners.
The City must allow the contractor to operate freely in their best
interest, as long as the outcomes are achieved.
324 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
• The City has the right to advertise for private contracted
partnership services, or negotiate on an individual basis with a
bid process based on the professional level of the service to be
provided.
• If conflicts arise between both partners, the Parks or Recreation
Director and the highest ranked officer from the entity will try to
resolve the issue before going to each partner’s legal counsel. If
none can be achieved, the partnership shall be dissolved.
THE PARTNERING PROCESS
The steps for the creation of a partnership with the City are as
follows:
• The City will create a public notification process that will help
inform any and all interested partners of the availability of
partnerships with the City. This will be done through notification
in area newspapers, listing in a brochure, or through any other
notification method that is feasible.
• The proposing partner takes the first step to propose partnering
with the City.
• To help in reviewing both the partnerships proposed, and the
project to be developed in partnership, they ask for a Preliminary
Proposal according to a specific format.
• If the initial review of a Preliminary Proposal yields interest and
appears to be mutually beneficial based on the City mission
and goals, and the selection criteria, a City staff or appointed
representative will be assigned to work with potential partners.
• The City representative is available to answer questions related
to the creation of an initial proposal, and after initial interest
has been indicated, will work with the proposing partner to
create a checklist of what actions need to take place next. Each
project will have distinctive planning, design, review, and support
issues. The City representative will facilitate the process of
determining how the partnership will address these issues. This
representative can also facilitate approvals and input from any
involved City staff member, providing guidance for the partners
as to necessary steps.
• An additional focus at this point will be determining whether this
project is appropriate for additional collaborative partnering, and
whether this project should prompt the City to seek a Request
for Proposal (RFP) from competing/ collaborating organizations.
• For most projects, a Formal Proposal from the partners for their
desired development project will need to be presented for the
City’s official development review processes and approvals. The
project may require approval by the City Attorney’s office.
Implementation / 325
• Depending on project complexity and anticipated benefits,
responsibilities for all action points are negotiable, within the
framework established by law, to assure the most efficient and
mutually beneficial outcome. Some projects may require that all
technical and professional expertise and staff resources come
from outside the City’s staff, while some projects may proceed
most efficiently if the City contributes staff resources to the
partnership.
• The partnership must cover the costs that the partnership
incurs, regardless of how the partnered project is staffed, and
reflect those costs in its project proposal and budget. The
proposal for the partnered project should also discuss how
staffing and expertise will be provided, and what documents
will be produced. If City staff resources are to be used by the
partnership, those costs should be allocated to the partnered
project and charged to it.
• Specific Partnership Agreements appropriate to the project will
be drafted jointly. There is no specifically prescribed format for
partnership agreements, which may take any of several forms
depending on what will accomplish the desired relationships
among partners. The agreements may be in the form of:
• Lease Agreements
• Management and/or Operating Agreements
• Maintenance Agreements
• Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs)
• Or a combination of these and/or other appropriate
agreements
• Proposed partnership agreements might include oversight of the
development of the partnership, concept plans and architectural
designs, development and design review, project management,
and construction documents, inspections, contracting,
monitoring, etc. Provision to fund the costs and for reimbursing
the City for its costs incurred in creating the partnership,
facilitating the project’s passage through the development
review processes, and completing the required documents
should be considered.
• If all is approved, the partnership begins. The City is committed
to upholding its responsibilities to partners from the initiation
through the continuation of a partnership. Evaluation will be an
integral component of all partnerships. The agreements should
outline who is responsible for evaluation, the types of measures
used, and detail what will occur should the evaluations reveal
that partners are not meeting their partnership obligations.
PHYSICAL VISION PLAN
328 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 329
PHYSICAL VISION
PLAN
The Physical Vision Plan summarizes the
recommendations in the Fort Collins Parks and
Recreation Master Plan. It allows for an “at a glance”
view of the proposed system and shows how the various
parks, trails, and recreation facilities in the plan connect
and tie the system together.
330 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
PHYSICAL VISION PLAN
Proposed Parks, Land Acquired
New parks recommended in the 2008 Parks and Recreation Policy
Plan that have yet to be master planned and built. These parks
include the northeast community park, the east community park,
Bacon Park, Trailhead Park, and Iron Horse Park.
Proposed Parks, Land Not Acquired
Parks that have been planned but land has not been acquired yet.
These parks include Interstate Park, Bucking Horse Park, Eastridge
Park, and Fossil Lake Park.
Proposed Parks
New neighborhood, schoolside, or urban parks recommended by
this plan to meet level of service standards.
Proposed Community/
Neighborhood Centers
The planned Southeast Community Center in Fossil Creek
Community Park and two additional community or neighborhood
centers—in the new northeast and east community parks—
recommended by this plan to meet level of service standards.
Proposed Trails
Additional major paved trail connections recommended based on
this plan’s policy framework to complete the trail system and close
gaps.
Proposed Trail Connections
Trails that are currently planned should be completed in order to
expand the existing system.H O R S E T O O T H R E S E V O I R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
R
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 331H O R S E T O O T H R E S E V O I R
F
O
S
S
I
L
L
A
K
ETaft Hill RdTimberline RdLemay AveI-25I-25College AveMulberry St
Vine Dr
Harmony Rd
Horsetooth Rd
Trilby Rd
D r a k e R d
Prospect R d
Elizabeth Street Park
Richards Lake ParkRichards Lake Park
E Community ParkE Community Park
Bucking Horse ParkBucking Horse Park
Trailhead ParkTrailhead ParkIronhorse ParkIronhorse ParkLegacy ParkLegacy Park
Bacon ParkBacon Park
Poudre Plains Park
Old Town Park
Shields Park
Sunflower Park
Morningside Park
Heron Park
Wheaton Park
Parkwood Park
Eastridge Park
NE Community Park
Fossil Lake Park
R
R
R
Interstate Park
APPENDICES
334 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
APPENDIX A:
TRANSIT ACCESSIBLE
PARKS
Bus and MAX lines cover much of Fort Collins, but many parks are
not easily accessible from these routes. The map to the right and the
list below show the parks that can be easily accessed from public
transit. For the purposes of this plan, easily accessed means that a
park or recreation facility is within 1,000 feet of a transit stop.
Transit Accessible Recreation Facilities
All existing recreation facilities are accessible by public transit.
Transit Accessible Parks
• Avery Park
• Blevins Park
• Buckingham Park
• City Park
• Civic Center Park
• Eastside Park
• Edora Park
• Lee Martinez Park
• Library Park
• Oak Street Plaza
• Old Fort Collins Park
• Ridgeview Park
• Roland Moore Park
• Washington Park
• Warren Park
• Woodwest Park
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 335
Transit Accessible Parks
0 1/2 1 2
Miles
Transit Accessible Park
Bus Routes
MAX Line
Bus Stop
Recreation Facility
336 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
APPENDIX B:
BENCHMARKING
Fort Collins’ park and recreation amenities were benchmarked
against a set of five peer cities that have similar demographic or
economic characteristics, or have highly regarded public space
systems.
Factors that went into picking the peer cities included considerations
such as a major university presence, similar demographics, similar
climate, a mix of regional and national cities, and a mix of peer and
aspirational cities. Data that includes budget, park acreage, and
number of amenities was recorded for each peer city.
• Aurora, CO
• Boise, ID
• Boulder, CO
• Madison, WI
• Minneapolis, MN
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 337
Fort Collins Aurora Boise Boulder Madison Minneapolis
CO CO ID CO WI MN
University Presence
Major University Colorado State Boise State CU Boulder U of Wisconsin U of Minnesota
University Enrollment 33,413 22,113 33,246 43,820 51,147
Source: Google 11/18/2019
Overall Population
Population 159,150 357,323 220,859 106,271 248,856 411,452
Area (sq mi) 56.0 153.5 82.1 24.8 76.9 54.0
Population Density (people/sq mi) 2,842 2,328 2,690 4,285 3,236 7,619
Population Change 2000-2017 284096.4%9.9%7.4%9.1%6.7%7.5%
Source: 2013-2017, 2006-2010 ACS
5-Year Estimates
Economic Characteristics
Median Household Income $60,110 $58,343 $54,547 $68,612 $59,387 $55,720
Change in Median Household
Income2000-2017
21.2%17.8%8.2%5.8%13.0%20.9%
Labor Force Participation Rate 70.0%71.2%68.8%66.6%72.1%74.2%
Unemployment Rate 5.9%6.0%5.0%5.6%4.1%6.0%
Poverty Rate 17.0%13.7%14.0%19.2%18.3%20.7%
Source: 2013-2017, 2006-2010 ACS
5-Year Estimates
Demographics
Median Age 29.2 34.2 36.0 28.6 31.0 32.1
Senior Population (65+)10.1%10.5%13.1%10.5%11.1%9.2%
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino 80.6%45.6%82.6%81.0%74.5%59.9%
Hispanic or Latino (any race)11.8%28.6%8.7%9.3%7.0%9.8%
Percent Foreign Born 6.4%19.8%7.0%11.2%11.7%15.9%
Bachelor's Degree or Higher 53.6%28.5%40.9%73.8%57.1%48.3%
Source: 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year
Estimates
Climate
Average Annual Temperature 50.3 50.5 52.5 51.0 46.5 46.3
Average Annual High Temperature 63.7 64.4 63.6 64.0 56.0 55.3
Average Annual Low Temperature 36.8 36.6 41.3 38.0 36.9 37.3
Average Annual Precipitation (inches) 16.1 15.4 11.7 18.3 34.5 30.6
Average Annual Snowfall (inches) 55.8 58.3 19.2 73.2 38.2 54.4
Elevation (ft) 5,160.0 5,266.0 2,838.0 5,288.0 858.0 834.0
Koppen Climate Classification Tropical/
Subtropical
Steppe
Tropical/
Subtropical
Steppe
Mediterranean Tropical/
Subtropical
Steppe
Warm Summer
Continental
Hot Summer
Continental
Source: weatherbase.com 11/18/2019
TPL Analysis
TPL Residents within a 10-minute
walk
67%88%69%90%94%96%
TPL ParkScore Ranking NA 23.0 21.0 NA 12.0 3.0
Source: tpl.org 11/18/2019
338 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
GOOD
49%
EXCELLENT
42%
FAIR
2%
POOR
1%
HAVE NOT
VISITED
4%
95%
EXCELLENT OR GOOD
AMONG THOSE WHO HAVE
PARTICIPATED
HAVE NOT
VISITED
12%EXCELLENT
28%
GOOD
51%
FAIR
7%
Overall, how would you rate the physical condition of the _____ you or other members of
your household have visited during the past 12 months?
POOR
1%
RECREATION FACILITIES
90%
EXCELLENT OR
GOOD AMONG
THOSE WHO HAVE
PARTICIPATED
PARKS, NATURAL AREAS,
OR OPEN SPACES
How would you rate the overall quality of recreation programs offered by the City of Fort
Collins that you and members of your household have participated in during the past 12
months?
POOR
1%
HAVE NOT PARTICIPATED
41%
EXCELLENT
19%
GOOD
33%
FAIR
5%
88%
EXCELLENT OR GOOD
AMONG THOSE WHO HAVE
PARTICIPATED
APPENDIX C:
SURVEY RESULTS
The following is a summary of selected results from the statistically valid survey conducted as part of the planning
process. A separate survey results report contains all results and information on how the survey was conducted.
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 339
Do you feel that there are sufficient public parks, natural areas, and open spaces within
walking distance of your residence?
79%
YES
LARIMER COUNTY
LOVELAND
WINDSOR
DENVER
LA PORTE
BOULDER
BELLVUE
GREELEY
WELLINGTON
OTHER
From the following list, please check ALL the communities in the area that you and members
of your household have visited or used for parks and recreation facilities in the past 12
months .
91%
28%
18%
15%
10%
46%
22%
17%
12%
7%
340 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
How important are quality parks, paved
trails, recreation facilities, and programs
to the identity of Fort Collins?
MINIMALLY
1%
How well do parks, paved trails, recreation
facilities/programs in Fort Collins reflect
the identity of the City?
NOT IMPORTANT
1%
MINIMALLY
2%
SOMEWHAT
19%
VERY WELL
80%
SOMEWHAT
12%
VERY
IMPORTANT
85%
97%
SOMEWHAT OR VERY
IMPORTANT
80%
VERY WELL
SENIORS (50+)
NATURE (OUTDOOR REC. & ED.)
FITNESS/WELLNESS
SPECIAL EVENTS/FESTIVALS
Priority Investment Rating: Programs
172
171
108
86
80
62
41
21
149
96
85
78
61
39
7
120
88
82
62
54
31
Low Priority Medium Priority (70+)High Priority (125+)
YOUTH & FAMILY
SPORT DROP-IN PLAY
AQUATICS (LESSN., FIT., TEAMS)
HISTORY
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
INCLUSION SUPPORT FOR DIS.
SPORTS LEAGUES
ICE SKATING (LESSN., CLIN., TM.)
STEM PROGRAMS
TEENS
FARM & GARDENING
EARLY CHILDHOOD
ARTS & CRAFTS CLASSES
SPECIALIZED PROG. FOR DIS.
VOLUNTEERING
COMPUTER ACCESS
OTHER
SURVEY RESULTS
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 341
Priority Investment Rating: Outdoor Facilities
NAT. AREAS/WILDLIFE HABITAT
PLAYGROUNDS
PAVED, MULTI-USE TRAILS
RENTABLE EVENT SPACE
COMMUNITY GARDENS
TENNIS COURTS
WATER PLAY FEATURES
VOLLEYBALL COURTS
DOWNTOWN PARKS & PLAZAS
DIAMOND ATHLETIC FIELDS
HIKING TRAILS
COURTS (P-/H-BALL, BOCCE)
UNPROGRAMMED SPACES
RECTANGULAR SPORTS FIELDS
DOG PARKS
BIKE PARKS
MOUNTAIN BIKE COURSES
OTHER
PARK SHELTERS/PICNIC AREAS
BASKETBALL COURTS
SKATE PARKS
168
161
120
95
65
53
36
31
157
120
89
64
51
33
30
122
106
84
55
50
33
Low Priority Medium Priority (70+)High Priority (125+)
Priority Investment Rating: Indoor Facilities
SWIMMING POOL
EXERCISE & FITNESS EQUIP.
197
195
113
91
76
45
22
160
106
90
55
40
12
147
91
79
54
35
Low Priority Medium Priority (70+)High Priority (125+)
ARTS, CRAFTS, GAMES ROOMS
WALKING/JOGGING TRACK
INDOOR SPORTS FIELDS
LAP POOL
DINING
SPACES FOR FITNESS/DANCE
COMPUTER ROOMS
SPACES FOR MEETINGS/PARTIES
MAKER SPACES
INDOOR WATER PARK
CLASSROOM SPACES
MULTI-PURPOSE GYMS
DESIGN LABS
INDOOR COURTS
OTHER
HEALTH CLINIC
342 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
How supportive are you of some increase in taxes to fund the types of parks, trails, and
recreation facilities that are most important to you and your household?
VERY
SUPPORTIVE
35%
SOMEWHAT
SUPPORTIVE
32%
NOT SURE
17%
NOT
SUPPORTIVE
15%
67%
VERY OR SOMEWHAT
SUPPORTIVE
Do you agree that parks, paved trails, and recreation facilities in Fort Collins are beautiful?
DISAGREE
2%
STRONGLY
DISAGREE
1%
STRONGLY
AGREE
55%
98%
AGREE OR STRONGLY
AGREE
SURVEY RESULTS
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 343
LACK OF PUBLIC RESTROOMS
PEOPLE EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS THERE
DON’T HAVE TIME OR INTEREST
FEES ARE TOO HIGH
DON'T KNOW WHERE TO GO/WHAT'S OFFERED
PARKS ARE TOO CROWDED
TOO FAR FROM OUR RESIDENCE
Please check ALL the reasons that prevent you or members of your household from using
parks and recreation facilities or programs in Fort Collins more often .
17.2%
15.1%
32.9%
11.5%
21.1%
7.6%
6.8%
3.5%
2.9%
1.4%
13.3%
23.1%
10.0%
18.6%
7.4%
4.7%
3.5%
2.0%
1.2%
12.1%
21.3%
8.4%
7.4%
4.3%
3.5%
1.6%
FACILITIES ARE NOT WELL MAINTAINED
USE FACILITIES IN OTHER CITIES
AQUATICS (LESSON, FITNESS, TEAMS)
PROGRAM TIMES ARE NOT CONVENIENT
NOT ACCESSIBLE BY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
REGISTRATION FOR PROGRAMS IS DIFFICULT
NOT ACCESSIBLE TO PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
FACILITIES LACK RIGHT EQUIPMENT
I HEAR NEGATIVE THINGS ABOUT PARKS
POOR/UNCOMFORTABLE PARK ATMOSPHERE
POOR CUSTOMER SERVICE BY STAFF
FACILITY OPERATING HOURS NOT CONVENIENT
DESIRED FACILITY/PROGRAM IS NOT OFFERED
INADEQUATE LIGHTING
NO VISIBLE PATROLLING PRESENCE
ACTIVITIES GOING ON MAKE ME FEEL UNSAFE
OTHER
NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE TO FEEL COMFORTABLE
FEAR OF GETTING INJURED
DRIVE WALK BIKE MAX BUS CAR-
SHARE OTHER BIKE-
SHARE
Please check ALL the ways you travel to the parks and recreation facilities that you use .
92%
80%
69%
9%
4%2%1.4%0.8%
344 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan
APPENDIX D:
SOURCES
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Physical
Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General (Atlanta:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996), 4–8, http://
www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/sgr/pdf/sgrfull.pdf
2. Emily B. Kahn et al. and the Task Force on Community
Preventive Services, “The Effectiveness of Interventions to
Increase Physical Activity,” American Journal of Preventive
Medicine 22, no. 4S (2002): 87–88.
3. Li, D., and Sullivan, W. C. (2016). “Impact of views to school
landscapes on recovery from stress and mental fatigue.”
Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 149–158.
4. Watts, G. (2017). “The effects of ‘greening’ urban areas on the
perceptions of tranquility.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,
26, 11–17.
5. Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., and Gross, J. J. (2015).
“The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and
cognition.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41–50.
6. Crompton, Dr. John. “Measuring the Economic Impact of Park
and Recreation Services” by 2010. National Recreation & Park
Association.
7. Andrea Faber Taylor et al., “Coping with ADD: The Surprising
Connection to Green Play Settings,” Environment and
Behavior 33, no. 1 (January 2001): 54–77.
8. Nowak, David and Heisler, Gordon. “Air Quality Effects of
Urban Parks and Trees”. 2010. National Recreation & Park
Association.
9. Akbari, H., D. Kurn, et al. 1997. Peak power and cooling energy
savings of shade trees. Energy and Buildings 25:139–148.
10. Environmental Protection Agency. n.d. What is Green
Infrastructure? Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/
greeninfrastructure/what-greeninfrastructure
11. E.Gregory McPherson, et. al. “Benefit-Cost Analysis of Fort
Collins’ Municipal Forest” by 2003. Pacific Southwest Research
Station Center for Urban Forest Research.
Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan / 345
12. Sherer, Paul. “The Benefits of Parks: Why America Needs More
City Parks and Open Space.” 2006. The Trust for Public Land.
13. Outdoor Industry Association, The Outdoor Recreation
Economy: Colorado
14. IMPLAN and the Center for Regional Analysis—George Mason
University for NRPA
15. Environmental Protection Agency. n.d. What is Green
Infrastructure? Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/
greeninfrastructure/what-greeninfrastructure
16. Sherer, Paul. “The Benefits of Parks: Why America Needs More
City Parks and Open Space.” 2006. The Trust for Public Land.
17. Rails to Trails Conservancy. 2008. Active Transportation for
America: The Case for Increased Federal Investment for
Bicycling and Walking. Supported by Bikes Belong Coalition
18. Kuzmyak, Richard & Dill, Jennifer. 2012. Walking and Bicycling
in the United States. TR News. Retrieved on May 12, 2014:
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/trnews/trnews280.pdf
19. Garrett-Peltier, H. 2011. Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure: A
National Study of Employment Impacts. Political Economy
20. North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization -
Population Projections 2015–2030.
21. U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2013–2017
5-Year Estimates, Table B15001, 2017.
22. U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2013–2017
5-Year Estimates, Table B01001, 2017.
23. U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2013–2017
5-Year Estimates, Table B19001, 2017.
24. U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2013–2017
5-Year Estimates, Table B01001H, 2017.
25. Crompton, Dr. John and Dr. Charles Lamb. Marketing
Government and Social Services.
346 / Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Master Plan