HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 7/6/2021 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. Agenda Item 14
Item # 14 Page 1
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 6, 2021
City Council
STAFF
Kai Kleer, Associate Planner
Brad Yatabe, Legal
SUBJECT
Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 090, 2021 Amending the Zoning Map of the City of Fort
Collins by Changing the Zoning Classification for That Certain Property Known as the Northeast Prospect & I-
25 Rezoning and Making Corresponding Changes to the Lighting Context Area Map and Residential
Neighborhood Sign District Map.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this item is to rezone 4.265-acres in the northeast quadrant of the I-25 and East Prospect Road
interchange (parcel # 8715000009). The site is currently zoned Urban Estate (UE) and the request is for
placement into the Industrial (I) zone district.
This item is a quasi-judicial matter and if it is considered on the discussion agenda it will be considered in
accordance with the procedures described in Section 1(d) of the Council’s Rules of Meeting Procedures
adopted in Resolution 2019-064.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading.
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
This item is related to a development application being submitted for an Overall Development Plan (ODP) on a
115-acre parcel of vacant land located at the northeast quadrant of I-25 and East Prospect Road.
Both the rezoning and the ODP are designed to facilitate a future industrial development project on the subject
115-acre site. The request to rezone the subject property complies with the standards and criteria of the Land
Use Code Section 2.9(H).
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
North South East West
Zoning Fox Grove, Low Density
Mixed-Use
Neighborhood (L-M-N)
Urban Estate (U-E) and
Industrial (I)
Urban Estate (U-E)
and Kitchell Estates,
County R-2 zoning
Industrial (I)
Land
Use
Single-family detached Undeveloped Undeveloped; Single-
family detached
residential (County)
Undeveloped
Agenda Item 14
Item # 14 Page 2
The subject property was annexed into the City of Fort Collins as part of the Galatia Annexation in 1991. Under
prior zoning law in 1991, the property was placed into the Highway Business (H -B) district, Industrial Park (I-P)
district, and Low Density Planned Residential (RLP) zone district (Attachment 6)
In 1997, the City adopted City Plan, created new zone districts , and implemented a city-wide rezoning that
changed the zone districts respectively to General Commercial, Industrial, and Urban Estate. Since that time,
conditions in the area have changed significantly and include:
• Development of the Poudre School District Site.
• Sale of 12-acres of land to Poudre School District.
• Construction of Fox Grove.
• Devolution of the Frontage Road by Colorado Department of Transportation.
• Regional stormwater infrastructure improvements and remapping of the FEMA floodplain.
REZONING EVALUATION
Summary of the Review Criteria for Rezoning of Parcels Less than 640 Acres Per Section 2.9 of the
Land Use Code
Per Section 2.9 of the Land Use Code, any amendment to the Zoning Map involving the zoning or rezoning of
640-acres of land or less (quasi-judicial versus legislative) shall be recommended for approval by the Planning
and Zoning Commission or approved by Council only if the proposed amendment is:
• consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan (City Plan); and/or
• warranted by changed conditions within the neighborhood surrounding and including the subject property.
The Planning and Zoning Commission and Council may consider the following additional factors:
• whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with exi sting and proposed uses
surrounding the subject land, and is the appropriate zone district for the land;
• whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significantly adverse impacts on
the natural environment, including, but not limited to, water, air, noise, stormwater management, wildlife,
vegetation, wetlands and natural functioning of the environment;
• whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly
development pattern.
The rezone request is based on 2.9.4(2)(b), and is justified by the changed conditions.
1. Criterion 2.9.4(H)(2)(a): Consistency with City Plan
The rezone request is not based on consistency with City Plan but rather 2.9.4(H)(2)(a) – Warranted by
Changed Conditions. The below information is a summary of City Plan’s guidance with respect to the
Structure Plan Map and flexibility provided in relation to the site.
City Plan (2019)
The Structure Plan Map in City Plan provides a framework for the ultimate buildout of Fort Coll ins. It focuses
on the physical form and development pattern of the community, illustrating areas where new greenfield
development, infill, and redevelopment are likely to occur, as well as the types of land uses and intensities to
encourage.
This site is designated as a Suburban Neighborhood District; however, the Plan acknowledges that in some
instances, place-type boundaries may not follow an existing parcel line, roadway, or other geographic
boundary and that the actual delineation of place types will be established at the time of a proposed re-zoning
and development submittal (p 94).
Agenda Item 14
Item # 14 Page 3
Though the place type designation is based on the current zoning boundary, there is some flexibility that is
granted to allow place type boundary to shift based on a dev elopment submittal and in this case, the initial
engineering of the Carriage Parkway alignment.
Based on the aforementioned considerations, the 205 -foot adjustment to align the Industrial zone district line
with the centerline of Carriage Parkway is consistent with City Plan and the Structure Plan Map.
2. Criterion 2.9.4(H)(2)(b): Warranted by changed conditions.
This rezone request is based on Criterion 2.9.4(H)(2)(b), which allows for zoning map amendments if
“warranted by changed conditions within the neighborhood surrounding and including the subject property.”
Staff identifies three main elements contributing to the changed conditions of the surrounding neighborhood
that warrant the rezone of this property.
• The original 1991 zoning of the site was based on a conceptual zoning plan that used streets and
drainageways to define zone districts and does not reflect the changes caused by recent development in
the area;
• Recent construction of the Fox Grove subdivision to the north has fully engineered and bu ilt the alignment
of Carriage Parkway that dead-ends into this site; and
• Sale of 12.44 acres to the Poudre School District for expanded uses in their Prospect Middle/High School
campus precludes the original alignment of Carriage Parkway.
Original zoning based on conceptual street alignments. The first change in conditions was in part due to
the original 1991 zoning of the site that was based on a conceptual zoning plan. The conceptual horseshoe-
shaped road and drainageway influenced the current zoning bo undaries of the site. (Attachment 6)
It was not until the adoption of the Master Street Plan and approval of the 2006 ODP that this alignment was
changed to reflect the new road standards of the City. With the alignment of today’s road system in the area,
the zone district no longer provides a rational relationship to the existing UE and I zone district boundaries .
Changes to alignment of Carriage Parkway. The second changed condition that warrants a rezone is the
2017 approval and subsequent construction of the Fox Grove residential subdivision to the north. It was during
the planning and engineering of Fox Grove that the alignment of Carriage Parkway shifted to the east, primarily
to meet the collector street radius requirements of the Larimer County Urb an Area Street Standards
(LCUASS).
Since approval, a portion of Carriage Parkway has been built and now dead-ends into the northern boundary
of this site. (Attachment 8) This change is now reflected in the amended Overall Development Plan that is
concurrently being processed as a Minor Amendment in conjunction with this rezone request. (Attachments 4
and 5)
The previous conceptual alignment of Carriage Parkway provided an appropriate transition between the I and
UE zone districts. (Attachment 8) With the new, partially constructed alignment for Carriage Parkway, the UE
district would be split across both the east and west sides of the roadway, rather than consolidated in one
area. If the zone district were split, there could be several complicating factor s for future development of the
western half. These factors include the addition of buffer standards required by 3.8.26, less orderly and logical
development of large lot single-family housing, and greater development challenges related to the construction
of Carriage Parkway and internal network of streets within the Industrially zone area.
Land acquisition by PSD for School District Campus. The final changed condition that warrants the rezone
is the sale of 12.44 acres of property for the Poudre School District Middle/High School campus, which is
currently under construction. The sale of the 12.44-acres precludes the original alignment of Carriage Parkway
(Attachment 9) because of their closed campus design. The design of the campus is an effort to limit access
for safety and management of the site. The conceptual realignment of Carriage Parkway is now pushed further
west and is anticipated to connect into East Prospect Road at the former Southeast Frontage Road
intersection.
Agenda Item 14
Item # 14 Page 4
3. Compatibility with Existing and Proposed Uses (Additional Consideration per LUC)
The greater 115-acres of NE Prospect & I-25 ODP are undeveloped. The rezone of the small portion of UE to I
matches the shift in Carriage Parkway alignment. The rezone of this area does not provide any g reater or
lesser compatibility with the existing residential and school uses in the area.
Future development of the industrially zoned land would be subject to the building and project compatibility
standards of the City’s Land Use Code. Those standards r equire that the physical and operational
characteristics (such as site layout, building, buffer and lighting design) of buildings and uses to ensure
compatibility with the residential properties to the north. Further, this area falls into the I-25 corridor overlay
district which requires a greater level of building and site design and landscaping than would otherwise be
required for commercial and industrial projects.
4. Adverse Impacts to the Natural Environment (Additional Consideration per LUC)
The site is currently used for dry-land farming and no natural habitat or features are involved within the rezone
area. It is not anticipated that the change in zoning or lighting context area would create any greater or lesser
impact to the natural environment, including, but not limited to, water, air, noise, stormwater, management,
wildlife, vegetation, wetlands, and natural functioning of the environment.
5. Logical and Orderly Development Pattern (Additional Consideration per LUC)
The proposed shift in the Industrial zone district boundary would result in a logical and orderly development
pattern by:
• Providing land use consistent with the zoning south and west of the rezone area.
• Using the Carriage Parkway, a two-lane collector street, as a logical zone district transition.
Lighting Context Area
On March 26, 2021, the City adopted new exterior lighting standards and established Lighting Context Areas
that correspond to the City’s zone districts. The property in its current Urban Estate zoning is in the LC1
lighting context area. The lighting context area corresponding to Industrial zoning and identified in Table 3.2.4 -
1 of the City’s lighting code is LC2. As part of this rezoning, staff recommends placement of the property into
the LC2 Lighting Context Area.
Residential Neighborhood Sign District
The residential sign district is intended to regulate signs for non-residential uses in certain geographical areas
of the City that may be particularly affected by such signs because of their predominately -residential use and
character. Staff is recommending removal of the property from the residential sign district and notes that
Division 3.9, Development Standards for the I-25 Corridor will provide stringent design standards for any future
development within this site.
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On May 20, 2021, at its regular meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously (7 -0) to
approve the rezoning and placement into the LC2 Lighting Context Area and removal from the Residential
Neighborhood Sign District.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Per Section 2.9(B), a neighborhood meeting is not required except that with respect to quasi -judicial map
amendments (rezoning) only, the Director may convene a neighborhood meeting to present and discuss a
proposal of known controversy and/or significant impacts. At the time of initial submittal, the project was not
seen as controversial, however, through subsequent communication with the surrounding neighborhoods both
staff and the applicant team determined that it would be appropriate. On June 14, 2021, staff hosted a meeting
to allow the applicant to share additional information and let community members list and discuss issues
related to the area. Issues discussed at the meeting include:
Agenda Item 14
Item # 14 Page 5
• The amount and type of traffic generated by future development of the 115-acre site.
• The need for traffic calming measures such as radar signs, speed tables, commercial truck restrictions,
and bulb-outs.
• Need for a park and future connectivity to the new Timnath Middle-High School at Prospect.
• Difference in traffic quantities between Urban Estate zoning and Industrial zoning (80 vs 120 trips per day).
• The need for a signalized Intersection at CR5 and E Mulberry to encourage a more equal distribution of
traffic between arterial and collector streets.
• Concerns about the frontage road being closed and the additional impacts it will have on cut -through
traffic.
• Types of development allowed in the Industrial zone district and ensuring compatibility of future
development with Fox Grove to the north.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity and Zoning Map (PDF)
2. Applicant Request (PDF)
3. Rezoning Legal Description (PDF)
4. Carriage Parkway Exhibit (PDF)
5. Amended Overall Development Plan (ODP) (PDF)
6. Galatia Background (PDF)
7. Original Zoning Exhibit (PDF)
8. Carriage Parkway (PDF)
9. School District Campus (PDF)
10. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes (draft) (PDF)
9,028
1,504.7
Vicinity & Zoning Map
This map is a user generated static output from the City of Fort Collins FCMaps
Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this
map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable.City of Fort Collins - GIS
1,143.0
1:
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere
Feet1,143.00571.50
Notes
Legend
6,859
Parcels
City Zoning
Community Commercial
Community Commercial North College
Community Commercial Poudre River
General Commercial
Limited Commercial
Service Commercial
CSU
Downtown
Employment
Harmony Corridor
Industrial
High Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood
Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood
Manufactured Housing
Medium Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood
Neighborhood Commercial
Neighborhood Conservation Buffer
Neighborhood Conservation Low Density
Neighborhood Conservation Medium Density
Public Open Lands
River Conservation
River Downtown Redevelopment
Residential Foothills
Low Density Residential
Rural Lands District
Transition
Urban Estate
ATTACHMENT 1
NE I-25 & Prospect
Structure Plan Amendment & Rezone
Overview of Request
This is a request to rezone approximately 4.265-acres (“Rezone Property”). The Rezone Property is part
of a larger mixed-use project (“Project”). The Project is currently undeveloped and is in the northeast
corner of I-25 and E Prospect Rd. The Project has already an approved, City of Ft. Collins ODP, dated July
25, 2006 (Exhibit 1). Several changes have occurred to the Project and/or to adjoining properties which
warrant an Amendment to the 2006 existing ODP and rezoning of a portion of the UE (Urban Estate) to I
(Industrial).
This rezoning petition is one of three concurrent submittals to the COFC updating and reflecting changes
to the Project. Major changes occurring since 2006 include:
1.Reduction of Flood Plain through the Box Elder Authority.
2.Reduction in the size of the Project through CDOT eminent domain for expansions of I-25
and the Prospect Interchange.
3.Closure and abandonment of the Frontage Road by eminent domain procedures by CDOT in
2019.
4.Realignment of Carriage Parkway caused by the approval of the Fox Grove subdivision by
the COFC.
5.Reduction in the size of the Project through sale of 12.44 acres to the Poudre School District
for expanded uses in their Prospect Middle/High School campus.
While changes 1-3 influence the Project, they are more appropriately addressed in the Amendment and
Annexation Submittals offered concurrently to this rezone. Changes 4 and 5 pertain to this submittal
since they affect the Rezone Property.
A visual summary of Changes 4 and 5 can be seen in Exhibit 2 attached.
Change 4. As shown in the Exhibit 1, Carriage Parkway was to originally locate a transition area between
UE and Industrial zoning. Upon approval of the Fox Grove development the entry point of Carriage
Parkway onto the Project needed to moved east. This in turn necessitated a realignment of Carriage
Parkway if we were to abide by COFC road standards. Please note this illustrated roadway alignment
has been the subject of countless meetings and considerable discussion with COFC engineering and road
staff and has been approved by both. As a result of the eastward movement of Carriage Parkway, an
orphaned piece of UE is now located west of Carriage Parkway. Our proposed rezoning of this (Rezone
Property) reinstitutes Carriage Parkway as the transition between the two zoning types. Please note we
are not asking for new zoning to the Project, but rather it is to reestablish Carriage Parkway as the
delineator.
Change 5. Exhibit 2 illustrates the parcel that was sold to PSD allowing them access to Carriage
Parkway as was requested by Staff.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit 1:
(Current Approved ODP)
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit 2:
(Current Zoning with Current Approved Carriage Parkway Alignment)
How is the proposed rezoning consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and I-25
Subarea Plan?
Consistent with the I-25 Subarea Plan (2003), the rezoning is consistent with the following:
Change 5. Sale of this parcel to the
Poudre School District Allowed their
direct connection to Carriage Parkway
Orphaned UE Parcel
Original Carriage Parkway Entry Point
ATTACHMENT 2
Framework Plan
The proposed rezone shifts the boundary between the I zoning and UE zoning east approximatly 205’ to
the centerline of Carriage Parkway.
Area of Prospect & I-25
ODP Amendment
Area of Proposed Rezoning
ATTACHMENT 2
Current Approved Carriage Parkway alignment bisecting current UE zone:
ATTACHMENT 2
Current Carriage Parkway alignment with proposed UE/I zone boundary adjusted to match Carriage
Parkway alignment.
Principles and Policies
Land Use: Principle I-25-LU-1: This subarea will have a balance of residential, commercial, employment,
and civic land uses and facilities.
•The proposed boundary adjustment will have a negligible effect on the balance of residential,
commercial, employment and civil and uses and facilities.
Principle I-25-LU-3: Subarea employment and industrial districts will have a variety of business types and
sizes, and will be compatible with surrounding land uses.
ATTACHMENT 2
•This proposed boundary adjustment will better create compatibility with surrounding land uses
by eliminating the orphaned UE parcel and restoring Carriage Parkway as the boundary between
the two existing zoning areas.
Principle I-25-LU-3: Consistent with City Plan and the regional plan, this subarea’s residential
development will be located and designed to minimize noise and other related impacts from I-25.
•The proposed boundary adjustment will improve noise and other related impacts from I-25 as it
shifts residential uses approximately 205 ft. to the east away from I-25. Carriage parkway will be
the natural buffer between the I zoned parcel and the UE zoned parcel.
Principle I-25-T-1: Consistent with City Plan and the regional plan, the subarea’s transportation system
will include a network of local roadways appropriate to support land use activities, and will support the
findings and recommendations of the North Front Range Transportation Alternatives Feasibility Study.
•The proposed boundary adjustment will have no impact on planned roadways.
Principle I-25-CAD-1: The subarea’s community entryways via I-25 should be designed to create a sense
of place and a positive experience.
•The proposed boundary adjustment will have a negligible impact on the entryway experience
from I-25. Carriage Parkway will serve as the natural division between the I and UE uses along
this stretch of Carriage Parkway.
Principle I-25-CAD-2: Important view corridors for vistas of the mountains should be preserved and
emphasized by the arrangement and design of development.
•The proposed boundary adjustment will have a negligible impact on views of the mountains.
Principle I-25-HSG-1: This subarea will include a mix of new neighborhoods at different densities, to allow
for transitions between urban and rural development areas, and to provide housing opportunities for a
variety of income levels.
•The proposed boundary adjustment will have a negligible impact on housing varieties. Proposed
zoning matches existing with no change in densities proposed.
Principle I-25-NOL-1: This subarea will provide a balanced system of recreation facilities, parks, trails,
natural areas, and open lands.
•The proposed boundary adjustment will have a negligible impact on balance of recreational
facilities. Recreation facilities, parks and trails, natural areas and open lands.
ATTACHMENT 2
Consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan (2019), the rezoning request is consistent with the
following:
Structure Plan
The proposed rezone shifts the boundary between the I zoning and UE zoning east approximatly 205’ to
the centerline of Carriage Parkway.
Area of Prospect & I-25
ODP Amendment
Area of Proposed Rezoning
ATTACHMENT 2
Area being rezoned is highlighted in purple below. The dark orange road alignment for Carriage
Parkway has been realigned by the City of Fort Collins as indicated by the bright orange alignment.
Neighborhood Livability and Social Health
Principle LIV 1: Maintain a compact pattern of growth that is well-served by public facilities and
encourages the efficient use of land.
• This rezone will create cohesive zoning within the existing pattern and improve the efficient use
of the land by preserving continuity of use on each side of Carriage Parkway.
Principle LIV 4: Enhance neighborhood livability.
• Providing a cohesive area of I zoned land west of Carriage Parkway and Cohesive UE zoned
land east of Carriage Parkway will allow for enhanced neighborhood livability by keeping like
uses conjoined and not fragmented.
ATTACHMENT 2
Culture & Recreation
Principle CR 1: Build Fort Collins’ identity as a thriving cultural and creative destination by supporting an
inclusive and equitable arts, culture and creative community.
•The zoning boundary adjustment will have a negligible effect on the culture and recreation
aspects as the zoning types are not being changed.
Economic Health
Principle EH 4: Ensure an adequate and competitive supply of space and/or land is available to support
the needs of businesses and employers of all sizes.
•This rezoning will provide a cohesive developable area of land for I – Industrial zoning west of
Carriage Parkway and cohesive developable land zoned UE – Urban Estate east of Carriage
Parkway. This rezoning will provide developable land of an adequate size and competitive
supply of space and/or land available to support the needs for businesses and employers of a
variety of sizes.
Environmental Health
Principle ENV 1: Conserve, create and enhance ecosystems and natural spaces within Fort Collins, the
GMA and the region.
•The proposed amendment will not result in significant adverse impacts on the natural
environment, including, but not limited to, water, air, noise, stormwater management, wildlife,
vegetation, wetlands and the natural functioning of the environment. The existing zoning
boundary between I and UE is proposed to shift to coincide with the centerline of Carriage
Parkway having little to no impact on existing ecosystems and natural spaces above and beyond
what would be expected under the current zoning of the subject area.
Safe Community
Principle SC 5: Provide opportunities for residents to lead healthy and active lifestyles.
•This rezoning will provide a cohesive developable area of land that will provide opportunities for
residents to lead healthy and active lifestyles by separating dissimilar uses by the natura buffer
provided by the Carriage Parkway.
Transportation
Principle T 1: Coordinate transportation plans, management and investments with land use plans and
decisions.
•This proposed adjustment to the zone boundary is responding the City’s approved alignment to
Carriage Parkway. The boundary realignment will have a negligible impact on transportation.
High Performing Community
Principle HI 1: Be a model for equitable, effective and transparent local governance.
•The proposed boundary realignment will have a negligible effect on equitable, effective and
transparent local governance as no new zoning is being proposed.
ATTACHMENT 2
Why the proposed rezone is warranted by changed conditions within the neighborhood
surrounding and including the subject property:
The previous alignment of Carriage Parkway was the natural boundary between the UE and I zoned
parcels. The current approved Carriage Parkway aliment bisects the UE zoning creating an orphaned UE
parcel west of Carriage parkway. The proposed boundary shift re-orients the boundary to align with the
newly approved an partially constructed Carriage Parkway.
How the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses
surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zone district for the land:
No new zoning is proposed. The boundary shift relates directly to the shift of Carriage parkway. The
adjacent zones are not affected by the change. Fox Gove to the north is zoned LMN and is currently
bound to the south by I and UE zoning which will not change with this proposal. The zoning to the east is
Orphaned UE Parcel
I Zoned Parcel
UE Zoned
Parcel
LMN Zoned Parcel
Fox Grove
Prospect Road I-25ATTACHMENT 2
Larimer County FA1 and is currently bound to the west by UE zoning which will not change with this
proposal.
How the proposed amendment would not result in significantly adverse impacts on the
natural environment, including, but not limited to, water, air, noise, stormwater
management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the natural functioning of the
environment.
This proposed boundary alignment shifts the I/UE boundary east approximately 205 ft. east and is a
direct reaction to the city’s relocation of Carriage Parkway. The intent is not based on a desire of the
client to increase the overall size of the I zoned area. I zoned uses are subject to the requirements of
the land use code and applicable jurisdictions and will be subject to the natural environment protections
requirements as applicable at time of development.
How does the extent of the proposed amendment results in a logical and orderly
development pattern?
This proposed boundary alignment shifts the I/UE boundary east approximately 205 ft. east and is a
direct reaction to the city’s relocation of Carriage Parkway. See change in Carriage Parkway below in
orange. The subject area is indicated in purple.
ATTACHMENT 2
Proposed rezoning requested with this application:
I Zoned Parcel UE Zoned
Parcel
Prospect Road I-25ATTACHMENT 2
Legal Description
Prospect and I-25 ODP Amendment – I/UE Zone Interface
Legal Description Page 1 of 1
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 7
NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF
COLORADO AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE N89°35’57”W
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF
406.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S00°14’11”W, A DISTANCE OF 484.52 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVATURE;
THENCE 526.06 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50º14'07“ AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS S25º13'27'W, A
DISTANCE OF 509.37 FEET TO A POINT REVERSE CURVATURE;
THENCE 244.13’ ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 421.12 FEET, A
CENTRAL ANGLE 33°12’57”, AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS N32°15’50”W, A DISTANCE OF 240.73 FEET;
THENCE N44°59’14”E, A DISTANCE OF 198.64 FEET;
THENCE N00°14’11”E, A DISTANCE OF 602.71 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15;
THENCE S89°35’57”E ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 204.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
CONTAINING 185,803 SQUARE FEET, 4.265 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE NORTH LINE OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, T7N, R68W, 6TH PM BEING S89°35’57”E. THE W 1/4
CORNER IS A FOUND 3 1/4” ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED RBD LS17483 AND THE CENTER 1/4 CORNER
IS A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED JR ENG LS24307.
ATTACHMENT 3
T
I
T
MH
MH
MH MH MHMH
/ / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / //
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / / /
/
/
/
/ / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
// / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / /
/ / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / /R600'
±449'
R600'±918'±485'FOX GROVE
CARRI
A
G
E
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
CONNECT TO
EXISTING ROAD
INTERSTATE 25PROSPECT ROAD
WHITE
PROPERTY
PSD
PROPERTY
84' ROW
CONNECTOR
LOCAL STREET
MODIFIED MINOR
COLLECTOR STREET
84' ROW
26' ℄-
52' -
2% MIN.
26' ℄-
15' UTILITY
EASEMENT
4:1 MAX
4:1 M
A
X
6'10'
PKWY.
30" VERTICAL CURB
AND GUTTER
SIDEWALK12' CENTER LANE12' TRAVEL LANE12' TRAVEL LANE15' UTILITY
EASEMENT
4:1 MA
X
4:1 MAX
6'10'
PKWY.
SIDEWALK 8' BIKE LANE8' BIKE LANEE N G I N E E R N GI
EHTRON RN CONCEPTUAL ALIGNMENT
CARRIAGE PARKWAY
JANUARY 11, 2019 FORT COLLINS, CO
WHITE PROPERTY
D:\PROJECTS\1489-001\DWG\EXHIBITS\CARRIAGE PKWY ALIGNMENT EXHIBIT.DWG
( IN FEET )
0
1 INCH = 500 FEET
500 500
MODIFIED MINOR COLLECTOR
ATTACHMENT 4
ICGUELMNCGCGCGEUELMNLMNUEEPOLM1FA1FA1FA1CCOUNTY ROAD 5INTERSTATE 25EPROSPECT RDMULBERRY ROAD/ HIGHWAY 14PROJECTSITEIAPPROXIMATE LOCATIONOF STREET CONNECTIONNATURAL HABITAT BUFFER ZONEAPPROXIMATE LOCATION OFBICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN TRAILWIDTH AS REQUIRED BY THECITY OF FORT COLLINSTRAILS MASTERPLANAPPROXIMATE LOCATIONOF TRAIL CONNECTIONLAND USE AREA BOUNDARYFORT COLLINS I-25 SUBAREAPLAN "ACTIVITY ZONE"ODP BOUNDARY /PROPERTY LINEPUBLIC STREETWITH BICYCLE LANES ASREQUIRED BY LCUASSAPPROXIMATE LOCATIONOF BUS / TRANSIT STOPPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYUEHIGH SCHOOL SITECGFORT COLLINS/I-25INTERCHANGECORNER LLCCGPARADIGMPROPERTIESIINDUSTRIAL± 73.48 ACRESCGIINTERSTATE 25CARRIAGE PARKWAY(COLLECTOR)PROPERTY BOUNDARYIINDUSTRIAL± 6.09 ACRESLARIMER COUNTY FA1KITCHELL SUBDIVISION16 D.U.80 AC5 AC/D.U.UEIUEPROPERTY BOUNDARY UELMNCLYDESDALE216 D.U.80 AC2.7 D.U./ACM1WATERDALELARIMER COUNTY 17637 AC4.75 D.U./ACBOXELDER CREEKEFORT COLLINS/I-25INTERCHANGECORNER LLCCLARIMERCOUNTYCG1303FRONTAGEHOLDINGSLLCPROSPECT ROAD/ LARIMER COUNTY ROAD #44 (ARTERIAL)PROPERTY BOUNDARY460’ – 660’INTERCHANGE STYLE(50' SETBACK ZONE)PROSPECT GATEWAY STYLE(50' SETBACK ZONE)EXISTING CACHE LAPOUDRE RESERVOIR INLET(50' NATURAL HABITATBUFFER ZONE)EXISTING APPARENTLAKE CANAL CO, DITCH(50' NATURAL HABITATBUFFER ZONE)CONCEPTUAL STREET CONNECTIONSAS REQUIRED BY LUC 3.6.3(F), TYPFOXGROVE TRAILCONNECTIONEXISTING GREELEYWATER EASEMENTPOTENTIAL TRAIL CONNECTIONTO PROPOSED SCHOOL SITEFULL MOVEMENT ACCESS INTERSECTIONFULL MOVEMENT ACCESS INTERSECTIONEXISTING BOXELDER CREEK BUFFER ZONEFLOODWAYFORMER FRONTAGEROAD ALIGNMENT(R.O.W. DEVOLVED BY CDOT)80' I-25 LANDSCAPE BUFFER80' I-25 LANDSCAPE BUFFERFORMER I/UEZONING BOUNDARY100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN50' SETBACK ZONE50' SETBACK ZONEEROSION BUFFER LIMITSPOTENTIALFUTURE TRAILUNDERPASSAMENDED I/UEZONING BOUNDARYCGCOMMERCIAL± 26.42 ACRES(10 AC. MAX BLOCK SIZE)CARRIAGEPARKWAY(ARTERIAL)LMNFOX GROVEFOXGROVE TRAIL1,320 FT. OFFSET FROMCENTERLINE OF I-25PHASE 1PHASE 1PHASE 2PHASE 2PHASE 2PHASE 3FULL MOVEMENT ACCESSSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONI-25 SUBAREA BOUNDARYI-25 SUBAREA BOUNDARYUEURBANESTATE± 9.49ACRESProspect/I-25 ODP First AmendmentNORTH0100' 200' 400'1603 Oakridge Drive, Suite 100Fort Collins, CO 80525970-223-7577SHEET 1 OF 2APRIL 7, 2021REVISIONS:DATE:____________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ ______________1. LAND USES AND DENSITIES DEPICTED ON THIS OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REPRESENT DEVELOPMENT INTENTIONS AT THIS TIME, HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT RESERVES THERIGHT TO CHANGE LAND USES AND/OR DENSITIES IN THE FUTURE CONSISTENT WITH THE I, CG, AND U-E ZONING DISTRICTS. ANY ADDITIONAL LAND USES NOT ALLOWED IN THEAPPLICABLE ZONE DISTRICT MUST BE APPROVED ACCORDING TO THE CRITERIA AS SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS.2. LAND USE AREAS ARE DESIGNATED ON THIS OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE.3. PUBLIC STREETS WILL BE DESIGNED TO THE "LARIMER COUNTY URBAN AREA STREET STANDARDS". THE ACCESS POINTS SHOWN ON THIS ODP ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS ONLY.PRECISE LOCATIONS OF ACCESS POINTS WILL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF SITE SPECIFIC PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLANS.4. THE APPLICANT WILL WORK WITH THE CITY AND CDOT WITH RESPECT TO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AREA.5. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF SITE SPECIFIC PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLANS IN ORDER TO MEET LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR ALL MODES OFTRANSPORTATION.6. SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED ALONG THE PUBLIC ROADWAYS AT THE TIME OF SITE SPECIFIC PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLANS.7. PER LUC SECTION 3.7.3(E)(1), ALL TRANSPORTATION, WATER AND WASTEWATER, STORM DRAINAGE, EMERGENCY SERVICES, AND ELECTRIC POWER FACILITIES SHALL MEET THEMINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES AT THE TIME OF SITE SPECIFIC PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLANS.8. NO DRIVEWAY ACCESS WILL BE ALLOWED ON PROSPECT ROAD.9. THIS OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHOWS THE GENERAL LOCATION AND APPROXIMATE SIZE OF ALL NATURAL AREAS, HABITATS, AND FEATURES WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES AND THEPROPOSED ROUGH ESTIMATE OF THE NATURAL AREA BUFFER ZONE AS REQUIRED BY LAND USE CODE 3.4.1(E). DETAILED MAPPING OF A SITE'S NATURAL AREAS, HABITATS, ANDFEATURES WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF INDIVIDUAL PDP SUBMITTALS. GENERAL BUFFER ZONES SHOWN ON THIS ODP MAY BE REDUCED OR ENLARGED BY THE DECISIONMAKER DURING THE PDP PROCESS.10. ALL DEVELOPMENT THAT FALLS WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA FOR THE PROSPECT ROAD STREETSCAPE PROGRAM SHALL COMPLY WITH THE STREETSCAPE PROGRAM STANDARDS ASADOPTED BY THE CITY.11. DEVELOPMENT LOCATED WITHIN ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED TWENTY (1,320) FEET (ONE_QUARTER [¼] MILE) OF THE CENTERLINE OF I_25 SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THEREQUIREMENTS OF DIVISION 3.9 OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS LAND USE CODE.12. NATURAL HABITAT BUFFER ZONE: PLEASE SEE SECTION 3.4.1 OF THE LAND USE CODE FOR ALLOWABLE USES WITHIN THE NATURAL HABITAT BUFFER ZONES.13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL OBTAIN A FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT FROM THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AND PAY ALL APPLICABLE FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT FEES PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANYCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (BUILDING OF STRUCTURES, GRADING, FILL, DETENTION PONDS, TRAILS, UTILITIES, LANDSCAPED AREAS, FLOOD CONTROL CHANNELS, ETC.) WITHIN THEBOXELDER CREEK FLOODPLAIN LIMITS. ALL ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN ARE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE FORT COLLINS MUNICIPAL CODE.14. CONSTRUCTION OF NEW STRUCTURES, HARD SURFACE PATHS, WALKWAYS, WALLS, AND TRAILS IS PROHIBITED IN THE FLOODWAY UNLESS NO-RISE CONDITIONS ARE MET, PERSECTION 10-45 OF CITY CODE. ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE REGULATORY FLOODWAY MUST ALSO INCLUDE A NO-RISE CERTIFICATION PREPARED BY A PROFESSIONALENGINEER LICENSED IN COLORADO.15. STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS (TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT) IS NOT ALLOWED IN THE FLOODWAY.16. ANY DISTURBANCE TO THE MAPPED EROSION BUFFER WILL REQUIRE A STABILITY STUDY.NOTESVICINITY MAPLEGENDLAND USE BREAKDOWNPARCELLAND USE PHASE PERCENT OF TOTAL SITE AREACGCOMMERCIAL PHASE 123%+/- 26.42 ACIINDUSTRIAL PHASE 269%+/- 79.57 ACUEURBAN ESTATE PHASE 38%+/- 9.49 ACTOTALS115.48 ACATTACHMENT 6
1603 Oakridge Drive, Suite 100Fort Collins, CO 80525970-223-7577SHEET 2 OF 2APRIL 7, 2021REVISIONS:DATE:____________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ ______________Secretary of the Planning and Zoning BoardPLANNING & ZONING CERTIFICATEAPPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADOON THIS _____ DAY OF ______________, 20___. 20DATETHE UNDERSIGNED DOES/DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I/WE ARE THE LAWFUL OWNERS OF THEREAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED ON THIS SITE PLAN AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I/WEACCEPT THE CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH ON SAID OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN.WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.NOTARY PUBLICADDRESSOWNER'S CERTIFICATIONMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MEAS.(PRINT NAME)Eric S. WhiteA.D., BYTHISDAY OFBY:20DATEWITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.NOTARY PUBLICADDRESSMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MEAS.(PRINT NAME)A.D., BYTHISDAY OFBY: NEW DIRECTION IRA, INC. FBO BARBARA ANN MEDINA IRA20DATEWITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.NOTARY PUBLICADDRESSMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MEAS.(PRINT NAME)A.D., BYTHISDAY OFBY: M. Jennet White20DATEWITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.NOTARY PUBLICADDRESSMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MEAS.(PRINT NAME)A.D., BYTHISDAY OFBY: CW SUNTRUST20DATEWITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.NOTARY PUBLICADDRESSMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MEAS.(PRINT NAME)A.D., BYTHISDAY OFBY: Christopher D. White20DATEWITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.NOTARY PUBLICADDRESSMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MEAS.(PRINT NAME)A.D., BYTHISDAY OFBY: BOOREN LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIIP20DATEWITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.NOTARY PUBLICADDRESSMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MEAS.(PRINT NAME)A.D., BYTHISDAY OFBY: DUNKIN LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP20DATEWITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.NOTARY PUBLICADDRESSMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MEAS.(PRINT NAME)Robert C. Roth, Jr.A.D., BYTHISDAY OFBY:20DATEWITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.NOTARY PUBLICADDRESSMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MEAS.(PRINT NAME)A.D., BYTHISDAY OFBY:20DATEWITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.NOTARY PUBLICADDRESSMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MEAS.(PRINT NAME)A.D., BYTHISDAY OFBY: Daniel A. White20DATEWITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.NOTARY PUBLICADDRESSMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MEAS.(PRINT NAME)A.D., BYTHISDAY OFBY:Robert B. TaylorJane E. White20DATEWITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.NOTARY PUBLICADDRESSMY COMMISSION EXPIRES:THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE MEAS.(PRINT NAME)A.D., BYTHISDAY OFBY:Laura Snortland FairfieldProspect/I-25 ODP First AmendmentITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6
ATTACHMENT 6
ATTACHMENT 7
ATTACHMENT 8
ATTACHMENT 9
Michelle Haefele, Chair Virtual Hearing
Ted Shepard, Vice Chair City Council Chambers
Jeff Hansen 300 Laporte Avenue
Per Hogestad Fort Collins, Colorado
David Katz
Jeff Schneider Cablecast on FCTV, Channel 14 on Connexion &
Channels 14 & 881 on Comcast
The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities
and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221 -6515 (TDD 224-
6001) for assistance.
Regular Hearing
May 20, 2021
Chair Haefele called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Roll Call: Haefele, Hansen, Hogestad, Katz, Schneider, Shepard
Absent: None
3.NE Prospect & I-25 Rezone
Project Description: This is a request to rezone 4.625-acres in the northeast quadrant of the I-25 and East Prospect
Road interchange (parcel #8715000009). The site is currently zoned Urban Estate (UE), and the request is for
placement into the Industrial (I) zone district.
Recommendation: Approval
Secretary Manno reported that there were no citizen emails or letter received.
Staff and Applicant Presentations
Planner Kleer gave a brief verbal/visual overview of this item.
Roger Sherman, BHA Design, Inc. gave a brief verbal/visual overview of this item.
Planning and Zoning
Commission Minutes
ATTACHMENT 10
Planning & Zoning Commission
May 20, 2021
Page 2 of 2
Public Input (3 minutes per person)
Josh R, resident, he is concerned that is does increase industrial access to Carriage Parkway and close to homes
on the street. He prefers that it stay in its current condition or zoning.
Joan Sayer, resident, asked why anyone would want to put more commercial and industrial next to a subdivision
like Fox Grove. She does not know what industrial and commercial entails. Does it mean manufacturing plants, oil
wells, etc.? How about making the 4-acres open space, has this been considered?
Kathleen Schmidtke, she mentioned that they are ok and that it makes sense for this rezoning to happen. The
Whites have been exceptional neighbors.
Scott McDonald, resident, he is concerned with the traffic going north from Fox Grove and the light industrial traffic.
How much more traffic does the light industrial create compared to residential? He understands that the Whites
would like to start developing, and he would like for them to start from the south so that the traffic they create from
their development would go out southward more than through the residential area. He appreciates that this is being
considered.
Staff Response
Planner Kleer responded to Josh R. Based on the roadway standards under 3.6, typically access is required at no
greater than 660’ along a collector street. The 74-acers would still have that similar access to Carriage Parkway as
if it were rezoned or left urban estate. It is intended to be a place where manufacturing, warehousing,
indoor/outdoor storage, and secondary uses are permitted in the zone district. This may be unlikely with this
development. Ruth Rollings responded to Scott McDonald. The urban estate will generate roughly 80 daily trips
and the industrial will generate roughly 120 daily trips. These volumes from an engineering standpoint are low. The
AM peak hour trips from the urban estates would be roughly 6 and the AM peak hour trips for industrial will be 14.
The PM peak hour trips for urban estate would be 8 and industrial would be 14.
Commission Questions / Deliberation
Vice Chair Shepard asked Planner Kleer if by using streets and property lines to demarcate different zone districts.
Planner Kleer responded that is the typical practice.
Vice Chair Shepard commented that he apricated the public comment and that they should attend the neighborhood
meetings when they start.
Commissioner Hansen commented that there was a question from the public about this space being kept or made
open space. Rick White responded that the land uses are interesting. It is too premature at this point to answer this
question.
Commissioner Katz made a motion that the Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to City
Council the approval of NE Prospect & I-25 Rezone REZ210001 and place it into the LC2 lighting context area
and removal from the residential sign district. This recommendation is based on the agenda material, the
work session, the staff presentation, and discussion of the Commission. Commissioner Hansen seconded.
Vote 6:0
-1-
ORDINANCE NO. 090, 2021
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY
KNOWN AS THE NORTHEAST PROSPECT & I-25 REZONING AND MAKING
CORRESPONDING CHANGES TO THE LIGHTING CONTEXT AREA MAP AND
RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD SIGN DISTRICT MAP
WHEREAS, Division 1.3 of the Fort Collins Land Use Code (the “Land Use Code”)
establishes the Zoning Map and Zone Districts of the City; and
WHEREAS, Division 2.9 of the Land Use Code establishes procedures and criteria for
reviewing the rezoning of land; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed rezoning is warranted by
changed conditions within the neighborhood surrounding and including the subject property
consisting of the development of the adjacent Poudre School District property for a middle/high
school and the construction of the Fox Grove subdivision to the north and the associated
realignment of Carriage Parkway that ends at the northern boundary of the area to be rezoned;
and
WHEREAS, to the extent applicable, the City Council has also analyzed the proposed
rezoning against the considerations as established in Section 2.9.4(H)(3) of the Land Use Code;
and
WHEREAS the City Council has conducted a public hearing, considered the Staff
Report, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation and the findings, and the
evidence from the public hearing and, in accordance with the foregoing, has determined that said
property described below should be rezoned as hereinafter provided.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FORT COLLINS:
Section 1. That the City Council hereby makes and adopts the determinations and
findings contained in the recitals set forth above.
Section 2. That the Zoning Map adopted by Division 1.3 of the Land Use Code is
hereby amended by changing the zoning classification from Urban Estate (“U-E”) Zone District
to Industrial (“I”) Zone District, for the following described property in the City known as the
Northeast Prospect & I-25 Rezoning:
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH
PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO
AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
-2-
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION
15; THENCE N89°35’57”W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 406.91
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S00°14’11”W, A DISTANCE OF 484.52 FEET TO A POINT OF
NON-TANGENT CURVATURE;
THENCE 526.06 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE
TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET, A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 50º14'07“ AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS S25º13'27'W, A
DISTANCE OF 509.37 FEET TO A POINT REVERSE CURVATURE;
THENCE 244.13’ ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 421.12 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE 33°12’57”, AND WHOSE
CHORD BEARS N32°15’50”W, A DISTANCE OF 240.73 FEET;
THENCE N44°59’14”E, A DISTANCE OF 198.64 FEET;
THENCE N00°14’11”E, A DISTANCE OF 602.71 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15;
THENCE S89°35’57”E ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF
204.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
CONTAINING 185,803 SQUARE FEET, 4.265 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION
THAT THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
15, T7N, R68W, 6TH PM BEING S89°35’57”E. THE W 1/4 CORNER IS A
FOUND 3 1/4” ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED RBD LS17483 AND THE
CENTER 1/4 CORNER IS A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED JR
ENG LS24307.
Section 3. That the Residential Neighborhood Sign District Map adopted pursuant to
Section 3.8.7.1(M)of the Land Use Code be, and the same hereby is, changed and amended by
showing that the above-described property is not included in the Residential Neighborhood Sign
District.
Section 4. That the Lighting Context Area Map adopted pursuant to Section 3.2.4(H)
of the Land Use Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby changed and amended by showing
that the property described herein is included in the LC2 Lighting Context Area.
Section 5. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to amend said Zoning
Map in accordance with this Ordinance.
-3-
Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 6th day of
July, A.D. 2021, and to be presented for final passage on the 20th day of July, A.D. 2021.
__________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk
Passed and adopted on final reading on this 20th day of July, A.D. 2021.
__________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk