HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 06/15/2021 - RESOLUTION 2021-071 MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CO Agenda Item 13
Item # 13 Page 1
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY June 15, 2021
City Council
STAFF
Pete Wray, Senior City Planner
Paul Sizemore, Interim Director, Comm. Devt. & Neighborhood Serv.
Brad Yatabe, Legal
SUBJECT
Resolution 2021-071 Making Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Regarding the Appeal of the Planning
and Zoning Commission Decision Approving the Guardian Self-Storage Project Development Plan
PDP190020.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this item is to make findings of fact and conclusions regarding the appeal of the Planning and
Zoning Commission decision to approve the Guardian Self-Storage Project Development Plan. The appeal
was heard by Council on June 1, 2021.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution.
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
On March 11, 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission issued a decision to approve the Guardian Self -
Storage Project Development Plan (PDP). On March 25, 2021, a Notice of Appeal was filed by the adjacent
commercial property owner with the following allegations:
1. The Planning and Zoning Commission failed to conduct a fair hearing in that the Commission substantially
ignored its previously established rules of procedure when the Commission ignored the South College
Corridor Plan (Plan) when it approved the PDP instead of amending the Plan.
2. The Planning and Zoning Commission failed to properly interpret and apply Plan Policy LU -1.4 regarding
storage unit uses located away from the South College frontage when the Commission approved the
PDP with the enclosed mini-storage building located near College Avenue.
3. The Planning and Zoning Commission failed to properly interpret and apply LUC Section 3.10.2(A)
regarding enclosed mini-storage uses prohibited on the ground floor when the Commission
approved the PDP with a Modification of Standards permitting enclosed mini-storage on the ground floor of
the proposed building that included storage uses at all levels.
On June 1, 2021, Council considered the appeal allegations, the record on appeal and information pr esented
at the hearing, and testimony from parties in interest. After discussing the appeal allegations, Council denied
the appeal finding the Planning and Zoning Commission did conduct a fair hearing and properly interpreted
Plan Policy LU-1.4 and Land Use Code Section 3.10.2 (A).
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-071
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING THE
APPEAL OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECISION APPROVING
THE GUARDIAN SELF-STORAGE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN PDP190020
WHEREAS, on March 11, 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission (“Commission”)
conducted a public hearing at which the Commission approved the Guardian Self-Storage Project
Development Plan PDP190020 (“PDP190020”), including two modifications of standards and
two conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, on March 25, 2021, the attorney for OSF Investments, LLC, (“Appellant”)
filed a notice of appeal (“Appeal”) of the Commission’s approval of PDP190020; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Section 2-49, the Appeal was timely filed and the
Appellant is a party-in-interest eligible to file an appeal; and
WHEREAS, the Appeal alleged that the Commission failed to conduct a fair hearing
because it substantially ignored its previously established rules of procedure wh en it disregarded
the South College Corridor Plan instead of amending it; and
WHEREAS, the Appeal also alleged that the Commission failed to properly interpret and
apply South College Corridor Plan Policy LU 1.4 and Land Use Code Section 3.10.2(A); and
WHEREAS, on June 1, 2021, the City Council, after notice given in accordance with
City Code Section 2-52, held a public hearing pursuant to City Code Section 2-54 to consider the
allegations raised in the Appeal at which hearing the City Council considered the record on
appeal, additional evidence provided at the hearing and received during the site inspection, and
testimony from City staff, the Appellant’s representatives, and additional parties-in-interest Rich
Stave and Sandra Holt in support of the Appeal, and the applicant for PDP190020 and its
representatives opposing the Appeal; and
WHEREAS, after discussion, the City Council found and concluded based on the
evidence in the record and presented at the June 1, 2021, hearing that the Commission did not
fail to conduct a fair hearing because amending the South College Corridor Plan or any other
policy plan is not an established Commission rule of procedure; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further found and concluded based on the evidence in the
record and presented at the June 1, 2021, hearing that the Commission properly interpreted and
applied South College Corridor Plan Policy LU 1.4 because LU 1.4 is not a provision of City
Code, Land Use Code, or the Charter subject to appeal as a failure to interpret and apply, and
that it was within the Commission’s power to grant a modification of standard to Land Use Code
Section 3.10.2(A); and
-2-
WHEREAS, City Code Section 2-56(c) provides that no later than the date of its next
regular meeting after the hearing of an appeal, City Council shall adopt, by resolution, findings
of fact in support of its decision on such appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FORT COLLINS that, pursuant to Section 2-56(c) of the City Code, the City Council hereby
makes and adopts the following findings of fact and conclusions:
1. That the City Council hereby makes and adopts the determinations and findings
contained in the recitals set forth above.
2. That the fair hearing allegation and the allegation that the Commission failed to properly
interpret and apply Land Use Code Section 3.10.2(A) stated in the Appeal conform to the
requirements of Section 2-48 of the City Code.
3. That based on the evidence in the record and presented at the June 1, 2021, Council
hearing, Council finds that the Commission provided a fair hearing on March 25, 2021,
because amending the South College Corridor Plan or any other policy plan is not an
established Commission rule of procedure, and the allegation is denied.
4. That based on the evidence in the record and presented at the June 1, 2021, City Council
hearing, City Council finds that the allegation that the Commission failed to properly
interpret and apply the South College Corridor Plan Policy LU 1.4 stated in the Appeal
does not conform to the requirements of Section 2-48(b)(1) of the City Code because LU
1.4 is not a provision of the Code and Charter, and the allegation is denied.
5. That based on the evidence in the record and presented at the June 1, 2021, Council
hearing, Council finds that the Commission properly interpreted and applied Land Use
Code Section 3.10.2(A) as being subject to the Land Use Code modification of standards
procedure set forth in Land Use Code Division 2.8, and the allegation is denied.
6. That the Commission’s March 11, 2021, approval of PDP190020, including two
modifications of standards and two conditions of approval, is hereby upheld.
7. That based on the evidence in the record and presented at the June 1, 2021, hearing, the
Appeal is without merit and is denied in its entirety.
8. That adoption of this Resolution shall constitute the final action of the City Council in
accordance with City Code Section 2-56(c).
-3-
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this
15th day of June A.D. 2021.
__________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk