Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRetirement Committee - Minutes - 02/22/1990E • FORT COLLINS GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1990, 1:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Jerry Brown Mollie Mercer None Alan Krcmarik Angelina Powell Dennis Sumner Sue Wilcox, Secretary Bob Eichem, Treasury Administrator, was present. Also present for the latter part of the meeting was Don Mazanec, actuary from Mercer Meidinger Hansen. (NOTE: The name of this company has since been changed to William M. Mercer, Inc.) CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Dennis Sumner called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Jerry Brown moved that the minutes of the January 25, 1990 meeting be approved as written. Angelina Powell seconded the motion. It was noted there were some errors in the percentages reported in the minutes for cost -of -living adjustments. The correct figures are those in the draft to be presented to City Council. With this noted, the minutes were approved. ITEMS OF NOTE: • The chairperson said he had received a memo from the Medical Insurance Staff Committee stating that they would not have any information until May on the Total Compensation Study. Dennis asked Alan to send Jaime Mares a reminder that the GERC does wish to have a representative on the committee. Mollie will also follow up on this at her staff meeting in Employee Development. It was noted that Don Mazanec would be attending the GERC meeting today. Dennis noted that he was invited as chairman of the GERC to attend a City Governance Meeting on March 5. The purpose of the meeting is to obtain feedback from citizens on various issues related to governance of the City. GERC members offered comments and asked Dennis to report back on the outcome of this meeting. AGENDA REVIEW: As Don Mazanec was not in attendance at this time and Bob Eichem was available for his portion of the meeting, it was concluded that the order of business would be altered. DISCUSSION TOPICS - NEW OPEN ITEMS 1. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR FOURTH QUARTER, 1989 MAIN POINTS: Bob Eichem, Treasury Administrator, presented the Quarterly Investment Report for the Fourth Quarter, 1989. He noted that the rate of • return for 1989 had been 9.21% ($1,393,463), while comparable return on Treasury securities was 7.88%. Bob noted that he had implemented some active strategies which he hoped would increase the rate of return in 1990. He also noted that he has begun to purchase new types of investments to • diversify the portfolios of the City. Members of the Finance Department staff have been working with Bob to revise the investment policies, which should go to Council soon for approval. Bob suggested that it may be appropriate to consider hiring an external management firm to manage the GER portfolio. By devoting full attention to the market, a management firm would be able to invest in common stocks and potentially provide an even better return for the GER funds. DECISIONS/CONCLUSIONS: 1. The Quarterly Investment Report was approved and accepted as submitted. 2. The GERC will take under consideration Bob's suggestion to hire an external management firm. He was asked to follow up on this concept and provide more details. NEXT STEPS: The concept of using an investment firm to handle GER funds will be discussed further when Bob Eichem is able to provide more details. 2. PENSION INVESTMENT CLASS MAIN POINTS: The GERC has expressed interest in having some type of a pension investment class to enhance committee members' knowledge in this • important aspect of the committee's work. The scheduling of this class had been deferred pending the appointment of a Treasury Administrator. Now that Bob is on board the scheduling of this course was discussed. DECISIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Bob indicated he would be pleased to provide a pension investment course for the GERC. A two-hour session was tentatively scheduled for April, 1990. (NOTE: Due to scheduling conflicts, this date has since been changed to June 28, 1990.) NEXT STEPS: Bob will prepare necessary materials for this class. 3. THE CITY'S USE OF ICMA TO MANAGE VARIOUS EMPLOYEE INVESTMENTS MAIN POINTS: Alan was asked if the City had ever evaluated ICMA's competitiveness in the services that it currently provides for employee investments. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Alan noted that a competitive bid had never taken place. He will be working with Dave Agee, Jim O'Neill, and Employee Development to draft an RFP (request for proposal) which would enable the City to look at various competitors who could provide the same services as ICMA. It was noted that ICMA has experienced various administrative deficiencies in the recent past. However, Alan noted that the most recent fund transfers to ICMA were handled very well. • NEXT STEPS: Alan will follow up with Dave Agee and Jim O'Neill to determine if some type of competitive bid and evaluation process can be put together to explore alternatives to ICMA. • DISCUSSION ITEMS - OPEN ITEMS 1. COUNCIL COVER MEMO CONCERNING PROPOSED CHANGES TO GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN (AND ACCOMPANYING AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY) MAIN POINTS: The Committee reviewed a draft memo in detail. DECISIONS/CONCLUSIONS: A number of changes were proposed. NEXT STEPS: The revised memo will be submitted to Council as soon as it is completed and reviewed by the City Attorney's office. 2. DISCUSSION ON RESTATEMENT MATERIALS PREPARED BY DON MAZANEC MAIN POINTS: The resolution and restatement of the retirement plan were reviewed page by page. DECISIONS/CONCLUSIONS: There was extensive discussion of the information and numerous changes were proposed. The material and suggested changes will be reviewed by the City Attorney's Office. NEXT STEPS: Don will make the necessary changes to the resolution and restatement of the General Employees Retirement Plan. Also he will answer questions on Section 5, Minimum Period Payment of Article VI and the last paragraph of Section 2, Article IX. Mary Crumbaker/Smith of the City • Attorney's Office will be asked to review the document and offer additional comments. After that the revisions will be submitted to the GERC for review and then to City Council for consideration. 3. PENSION INVESTMENT SEMINARS/PUBLIC BENEFIT PLANS WORKSHOPS MAIN POINTS: Continuing discussion on this topic from our last meeting, Don and Alan presented information on additional courses and workshops which would be held later this year. Alan noted he still had not received the particulars of the GFOA Conference. Don distributed information on several workshops available through the International Foundation of Benefits in May and June. DECISIONS/CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that it would be appropriate for one or more members of the GERC to participate in this type of training session. Several members expressed interest in these training opportunities, but asked for further information before making a decision. It was concluded that Alan and Dennis would review the materials. NEXT STEPS: If any decisions were required prior to the next GERC meeting, Alan and Dennis would be responsible for preparing a recommendation for the committee. 4. GFOA BOOKLETS ON PENSION -RELATED TOPICS. • MAIN POINTS: Alan presented several booklets from GFOA which provide in-depth information on various pension -related topics. • DECISIONS/CONCLUSIONS: It was noted that it may be worthwhile for committee members to review these booklets. NEXT STEPS: These will be routed to the GERC members for their review and information. AGENDA AND SCHEDULE FOR NEXT MEETING The next meeting will be the Investment Class on April 26th from 1-3 p.m. The purpose of the meeting will be to hold the investment class to be instructed by Bob Eichem. (NOTE: Due to scheduling conflicts, this meeting date has been changed. The next meeting for normal GERC business is scheduled for June 21; Bob Eichem's presentation is scheduled for June 28. If the agenda for the June 21 meeting is light, we will hold both session on June 21.) ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 3:35 p.m. • •