Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLandmark Preservation Commission - Minutes - 07/05/1989• 0 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 5, 1989 MEETING MINUTES The meeting began at approximately 5:45 p.m. at 200 West Mountain Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. Members present included Bud Frick, Rheba Massey, and Andy Mutz. Members absent included Sally Ketcham and Prescott Handley. New members Ruth Weatherford and James Tanner were introduced to the Commission. Staff was represented by Kari VanMeter and Joyce Lewton. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Ms. VanMeter suggested postponing the election of new officers until the August meeting when other members would be present. The Commission concurred. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the June 7, 1989 meeting stood approved as submitted. CURRENT ITEMS C000ersmith's Brew Pub Scott Smith and Russ McCahn, representing the applicant, made the following corrections to the Staff Report: 1. Page 1, Requests, Subtopic 4: "Install two vents.... " 2. Page 2, Topic 2, Last sentence: "The purpose is to allow visual access to the interior of the brewery......" 3. Page 2, Topic 2, Second paragraph: "In this part of the shed, the working functions of the kitchen....." 4. Page 2, Topic 2, Second paragraph: "The opaque bottom glass panels will completely screen kitchen plumbing at floor level...." 5. Page 3, Topic 4: "Two Roof Vents. The operation of the kitchen... " The applicant presented a scale model showing the detail as proposed. The two windows, door, overhead garage door are to be removed and replaced with a recessed entry using the original, interior brick which will be weatherproofed with a clear coating. The entry will be framed with a freestanding brass pipe detail. At this time, the signage detail, which will be featured on the freestanding pipe, is incomplete. The applicant requested that the sign request be subject to administrative review. There will be two oak doors at the entrance with the company logo. Also requested was the change from smoked glass to a clearer, less opaque glass in the windows. They would be similar to the windows previously approved for Cooper & Cooper. The top portion would be the existing smoke glass with the bottom two feet of kickplate to be black, spandrel, opaque glass to hide the kitchen fittings and plumbing. Two new intake vents are necessary for the function of the brewery. They will be located next to the recessed entry on the south and will be finished in anodized bronze. There will be no steam or noise emitted by these vents. The two exhaust roof vents that have been requested came under discussion. Mr. Frick expressed concern in terms of the visual impact where the vents exit the roof of the older part of the building. Staff advised the Commission that since the vents will not cover existing architectural detail, the proposal meets the guideline requirements. Ms. Massey made a motion to approve the proposal as submitted with the provision that the exhaust vent visual impact be reviewed by staff and Mr. Frick when the exact details as to the construction method, placement, and finish are completed. Ms. Weatherford seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW The procedures for administrative review were approved by Council for the ordinance at the June 20, 1989 meeting. Downtown Plan Ms. VanMeter presented two copies of the final draft of the Downtown Plan to the Commission. The Commission was encouraged to make their comments to committee members after they review the plan. Poudre River National Recreation Area Feasibility Study Ms. VanMeter reviewed the premise of the study. The area would be from Taft Hill Road to the Larimer/Weld County line. She stated that the recreation area has federal significance in its environmental and social history. A low intensity, passive use of the river, which would encourage social and economic development, is envisioned with nature studies, bird watching, etc., as well as the location of a visitor center at the now vacant power plant. Ms. VanMeter stated that opposition to the NRA lies in two areas: 1) Landowners east of I-25 - mainly due to the impact to private property and the history of land condemnation; and 2) Because there is no developed detailed management plan, governmental agencies are reviewing the feasibility of the financial commitment to the area. Meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Minutes submitted by Joyce Lewton.