HomeMy WebLinkAboutDowntown Development Authority - Minutes - 06/06/2002DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REGULAR DIRECTORS' MEETING
TARRY STROUD, CHAIR 229-9900 (W)
BILL BERTSCHY, COUNCIL LIAISON: 484-8838: (H`
ANNE GARRISON, STAFF LIAISON 484-2020 (W).
MINUTES OF JUNE ®, 2002
REGULAR MEETING
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MET IN REGULAR
SE55ION AT 7:30 A.M. ON JUNE 15, 2002 IN THE MEETING ROOM AT HOME STATE. BANK - 303
E. MOUNTAIN AVENUE, FORT COLLINS, CO 80524.
PRESENT THERE WERE PRESENT:
LARRY STROUD, CHAIR
KM JORDAN, VICE CHAIR
JASON M:EADORS, SECRETARY/TREASURER
MARY BRAYTON,
RICK GOODALE
CAREY HEWITT
ASSENT:
GREG BELCHER
STEVE TAYLOR
BILL BERTSCHY
STAFF:
ROBERT STEINER, INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
ANNE GARRISON
LUCIA LILEY, LFGAL COUNSEL
GUESTS:
ALAN KRCMARIK, JOHN FISCHBACH, ED STONER, TED ZISELL, DAVID SHORT,
MYRNE WATROUS,
CALL TO ORDER MR. STROUD CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL WAS TAKEN.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES MR. HEWITT MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MAY 2, 2002 THIS WAS SECONDED BY MS.
JORDAN AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY,
SIGN REVIEW PROCESS MR. STEINER EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT THE CURRENT SIGN REVIEW PROCESS MAY DELAY
PROJECTS UP TO THIRTY DAYS, DEPENDING ON SUBMITTAL DATE. FOUR SOLUTIONS WERE OFFERED
TO THE BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION, AND MR. STEINER SUGGESTED THAT THE SECOND OPTION
MIGHT PROVIDE GREATER FLEXIBILITY.
MR, GOODALE MOVED TO ADOPT SOLUTION #P2, WHICH AUTHORIZES STAFF, TOGETHER WITH A
BOARD MEMBER AND ONE OR TWO ALTERNATES, TO MAKE SIGNAGE DECISIONS, IN THE DISCUSSION
WHICH FOLLOWED, MS. BRAYTON NOTED THAT BEFORE DDA GIVES APPROVAL, ALL SIGNAGE MUST
MEET AND PASS CITY CODE. MS. JORDAN THEN SUGGESTED THAT THE PROCESS MIGHT BE BETTER
SERVED IF STAFF AND A POOL OF BOARD MEMBERS MAKE THESE DETERMINATIONS. THIS
SUGGESTION WAS ACCEPTABLE TO MR. GOODALE, SECONDED BY MR. MEW= AND CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
OTS MAINTENANCE MESSRS. STONER AND STEINER TOOK TIME RECENTLY TO WALK THROUGH AND REVIEW
AGREEMENT THE PLAZA. MR. STEINER NOTED THAT DDA NEEDS TO DO. DUE DILIGENCE REGARDING CAPITAL
DDA MINUTES
PAGE 2
IMPROVEMENTS, IN A RECENT MEETING BETWEEN MESSRS, STONER, FISCHBACH, STEMFR ANC
MS. LILEY, THE DISCUSSION LEANED TOWARD TRANSFERRING CONTROL OF THE OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF THE PLAZA TO THE CITY AND DDA. THIS WOULD ENTAIL A NOTICEABLE
DIFFFERENCE IN COST, BUT ALSO, IT IS HOPED, IN APPEARANCE.
MR, FISCHBACH ADVISED THAT A COST ESTIMATE HAD BEEN COMPLETED. HOWEVER, FIGURES
REACHED HIS DESK LATE WEDNESDAY, AND ARE NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS MEETING.
M5. LILEY WILL DRAFT AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY AND DDA, AND ALSO ONE WITH
PROGRESSIVE OLD TOWN SQUARE, WHICH ADDRESSES THE FINANCIAL INTENTS AND CONTROL OF
COMMERCIAL VENUES. FT HAS BEEN LEARNED THAT PROGRESSIVE OLD TOWN SQUARE WISHES TO
RETAIN CONTROL OF THE VENDING CARTS WITHIN THE SQUARE.
AS AN ASIDE, AT THE TIME OF HIS VISIT, ROBERT GIBBS NOTED THAT THE CENTER OF ACTIVITY IN
DOWNTOWN HAS MOVED FROM OLD TOWN SQUARE TO COLLEGE AVENUE. THIS COULD BE A TREND
WHICH BEGS REVIEW. MR. STEINER WILL TOUR THE PLAZA AND SURROUNDING AREA TOMORROW
WITH MR. FISCHBACH, WHO SHOULD HAVE COMPLETED HIS ANALYSIS OF THE COST ESTIMATE BY
THAT TIME.
PLAZA PLAY AREA IN AN EARLIER REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT, THE BOARD APPROVED PARTICIPATION IN THE AMOUNT OF
UP TO $20,000, OR 40% OF THE COST, CONTINGENT ON OTHER FUNDING SOURCES. MR.
STEINER OBSERVED THAT THERE WAS $ 1 ,000 IN VERBAL COMMITMENTS, $4,000 IN SIGNED
PLEDGES FROM DOWNTOWN BUSINESSES, A $5,000 COMMITMENT FROM THE CITY, $5,000
FROM OLD TOWN SQUARE PROPERTIES, AND $5,000 FROM THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS
ASSOCIATION. THE TOTAL PROJECT COST IS $30,000 OF WHICH MR. SWANSON I -AS RAISED
$20,000, DDA IS BEING ASKED TO BEGIN DISBURSING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 1,500 FOR
DESIGN WORK. IN ADDITION, THE BOARD NEEDS TO APPROVE THE REMOVAL OF A PLANTER
BEFORE CONSTRUCTION CAN COMMENCE. MR. STONER SUGGESTED IT MIGHT BE PRUDENT TO WAIT
UNTIL AFTER NEWWESTFEST HAS TAKEN PLACE.
MS. BRAYTON THEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE IMMEDIATE EXPENDITURE OF $ 1 ,SOB TO BE TAKEN
FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND, AND INITIATE THE COLLECTION OF THE BALANCE OF
PLEDGES PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ANY OTHER FUNDS, AND TO ENSURE AN AGREEMENT, CRAFTED BY
MS, LILEY, IS IN PLACE. THIS WAS SECONDED BY MR. GOODALE AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
OTHER BUSINESS MR. STEINER PROVIDED AN UPDATE ON THE DOWNTOWN STRATEGIC PLAN, NOTING THAT THE NEXT
MEETING WAS SLATED FOR JUNE 20, AT 7:30 A.M. AND THAT DDA REPRESENTATIVES, MESSRS.
HEWITT, BELCHER, GOODALE AND TAYLOR WILL BE NOTIFIED Or THE DETAILS.
ROBERT GIBBS MET WITH A NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNERS DURING HIS LAST VISIT TO FORT
COLLINS. CONVERSATION OFTEN CENTERED AROUND THE BARS AND SUBSEQUENT BINGE DRINKING
ISSUE. Teo ZIBELL COMES BEFORE THE BOARD TODAY TO EXPRESS HIS CONCERNS, AND THOSE
OF OTHER. MERCHANTS REGARDING THE IMBALANCE WHICH.. THEY FEEL EXISTS, AND THE UNDUE
CONCENTRATION OF BAR$ IN A VERY SMALL AREA, FORT COLONS IS NOW A REGIONAL DRAW, AND
THE DEBRIS, BOTH HUMAN AND COMMERCIAL, 15 BECOMING A SERIOUS PROBLEM,
ON JUNE. 24. THERE WILL BE A LIQUOR REVIEW BOARD HEARING FOR LUCKY JOE' $ AND
ZYOECO'S, WHO ARE PETITIONING FOR A CHANGE FROM RESTAURANT TO BAR LICENSES. MR.
ZIBELL SPOKE TO THE QUESTION OF 'UNDUE CONCENTRATION' WITH TWO BARS ADJACENT FROM
EACH OTHER IN THE PLAZA. IN ADDITION, THERE HAS BEEN SOME DISCUSSION CONCERNING THE
REDEFINITION OF BOUNDARIES. THE ARGUMENT BEING THAT OLD TOWN WAS DEVELOPED TO SERVE
THE 'GREATER FORT COI-UNS AREA,' AND CURRENTLY, THE BOUNDARY ENCOMPASSES A ONE MILE
RADIUS.
MS. BRAYTON POSED THE QUESTION TO MR, FISCHBACH WHETHER ISSUANCE OF BAR LICENSES
WAS SIGNIFICANTLY GREATER THIS YEAR THAN W 2000 OR 200I . MR, FISCHBACH SAID THEY
WERE NOT. MS. BRAYTON EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT OLD TOWN WAS RECEIVING NEGATIVE PRESS
WHICH CQULD RESULT IN THE LOSS OF POTENTIAL NEW BUSINESSES IN THE DOWNTOWN,
HOWEVER, SHE CONCURRED THAT THERE ARE ISSUES WHICH SHOULD BE RESOLVED, AND AFTER
SOME DISCUSSION, M5. BRAYTON PROPOSED A MEETING BETWEEN THE. DOA BOARD, INTERESTED
MERCHANTS, CHIEF OF POLICE AND CITY ATTORNEY TO TALK ABOUT WORKABLE SOLUTIONS, AND
GET SOME ACCURATE NUMBERS ON THE TABLE.
MR. STEINER IMMEDIATELY OFFERED TO SET TIME ASIDE FOR A MORE IN DEPTH DISCUSSION WITH
MR. FISCHBACH THAT WILL ENCOMPASS LONG TERM SOLUTIONS AND ISSUES OF CLEANLINESS. M:R..
STROUD SUGGESTED THAT BARS MAY NEED TO BEAR SOME OF THE MAINTENANCE CCSTS INVOLVED,
DDA MINUTES
PAGE 3
UPDATE
MR. STEINER PROVIDED THE BOARD WITH AN UPDATE ON 185 NORTH COLLEGE AVENUE. IN A
RECENT CONVERSATION, MACK ANDERSON VERBALLY AGREED TO UNDERWRITE THE. COST OF THE
COLOR CHANGE AND STUCCO SURROUND ON JOHNNY'S PLACE. AN AGREEMENT, DRAFTED BY
Ms. LILEY HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO HIM, AND BOTH HIS ATTORNEY AND TENANT HAVE
CONCURRED, BUT THE DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN RETURNED FOR REVIEW.
SALES TAX
MR. KRCMARIK WAS AVAILABLE TO FIELD QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD REGARDING THE MOST
RECENT SALES TAX REPORT SPANNING JANUARY TO MAY, 2002. THERE IS A TREND THAT IS
CHANGING. IN THE LAST REPORT, MR. KRCMARIK REPORTED THAT ON REMOVING -['HE ANNEXATION
FROM THE PICTURE, SOME SMALL GROWTH WAS STILL EVIDENT IN THE GENERAL FIGURES. SINCE
THAT TIME, FIGURES ARE DOWN 1 I % - 12% EVERYWHERE EXCEPT THOSE OF THE RECENT
ANNEXATION, IN FACT YEAR TO DATE IS DOWN 2%. MR. KRCMARIK INDICATED THAT THERE ARE
SIGNS THAT WE ARE RECOVERING, IN THAT TWO MONTHS AGO FIGURES WERE JUST UNDER, AND
RECENTLY ARE ONE HALF PERCENT OVER. HE ALSO ANTICIPATES WE WILL SEE AN IMPROVEMENT
AS THE YEAR ADVANCES. LAST YEAR, THE CLOSING OF THE STEELE'S STORES WAS ONE OF THE
REASONS FOR THE DECLINING BASE. AT THIS JUNCTURE, MS. BRAYTON REQUESTED AN UPDATE
ON THE STEELE'S REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
SEARCH COMMITTEE
MR. STROUD REPORTED THAT THE SEARCH COMMITTEE COMPRISED MARY BRAYTON, Kim
UPDATE
JORDAN, JASON MEADORS AND LARRY STROUD. THE POSITION HAS BEEN ADVERTISED IN THE
ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS, DENVER POST, COLORADOAN, AND ON TWO WEB SITES.
AT THIS TIME, TWENTY ONE RESUMES HAVE BEEN SCREENED. AND THE SEARCH HAS BEEN
NARROWED TO THREE FINALISTS. INTERVIEWS OF THE CANDIDATES WILL TAKE PLACE ON JUNE 18
BETWEEN 10:00 A.M. AND 2:00 P.M. SOME INTERACTION BETWEEN THE CANDIDATES AND THE
FULL BOARD IS PLANNED. INPUT IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS IS REQUESTED FROM THE
ENTIRE BOARD AT A MEETING ON JUNE 20, 2002; THE SITE TO BE DETERMINED. IT 15 PLANNED
THAT THE CANDIDATE WILL BE SELECTED AND IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE JULY 1 1. MEETING.
RESUMES ARE AVAILABLE AT THE DDA OFFICE AND MAY BE REVIEWED BY THE BOARD AT ANY
TIME.
ADJOURN THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9, 15 A.M.
JASON MEADORS, SECRETARY
DAUMOWN �
d do DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
19 OLD TOWN SQUARE, SUITE 230
FORT COLLINS, CO 80524
TO:
ctors
DDA Board ofIl�
FROM
Chip Steiner C
DATE:
July 8, 2002
RE:
River Corridor Update
Telephone (970) 484-2020
Telefax (970) 484-2069
During the process of annexing Lemay-Mulberry Crossings, the DDA agreed to
contribute $60,000 to the development of a River Enhancement Program. Bob Smith will
give the Board an update on how this program is progressing. Some background material
that the Board may have already seen is attached.
DOWNTOWN �
i'M
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
19 OLD TOWN SQUARE, SUITE 230 Telephone (970) 484-2020
FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Telefax (970) 484-2069
TO: DDA Board of Directors
FROM: Chip Steiner
DATE: July 8, 2002
RE: Transportation Funding Issues
The City is planning to place a number of transportation funding questions on the ballot
this November. Deputy City Manager, Diane Jones will be present to discuss these
proposals.
In brief, voters will be asked to approve a .25-cent sales and use tax and to approve a 1%
construction excise tax. In addition, the City is proposing a monthly Transportation
Maintenance Fee ($1.00/month for residences, more for other land uses), and a one time
transfer of $1 million from the general fund into the transportation fund.
A significant amount of background information is attached including sample ballot
language, projected cashflows, and the results of a questionnaire on transportation
funding issues.
There are some other fees being considered that the Board should be aware of
The Nexus Study on Affordable Housing is proposing a number of fees that will be
levied against new housing and the creation of new jobs through the addition of new
employers (the fee ranges by the type of job —lower for industrial and higher for retail) in
the City. Basically, the study recommends inclusionary zoning or, alternatively, a
mitigation requirement that would amount to $1,961 per new single-family housing unit
built (.18/sf average) and $1,400 per multi -family units (.51/sf average). Fees on non-
residential development, assuming 100 percent mitigation through the new housing fee,
would range from $1.10/sf for industrial land uses up to $2.70/sf for retail uses. Full
mitigation through fees levied against non-residential development only would range
from $7 to $18/sf. This fee proposal may be put off for a year.
Street oversizing fee: current proposal is to increase this fee by 14.9 percent that would
be used for traffic signals, Transfort Strategic plan and for bridges and box culverts. The
city is also contemplating a future intersection improvements program that would require
another 41.5 percent increase in the fee.
DOWNTOWN �
dft DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
19 OLD TOWN SQUARE, SUITE 230 Telephone (970) 484-2020
FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Telefox (970) 484-2069
TO:
DDA Board of Directors
FROM:
Chip Steiner
DATE:
July 8, 2002
RE: 223 North College Avenue
Attached is a proposal from Mikal Torgerson of M. Torgerson Architects requesting
DDA participation in facade and sidewalk improvements at 223 North College Avenue.
Total project cost is estimated at $103,000 of which $75,000 is being proposed as costs to
be paid for by the DDA. Tax increment on the completed project would be around
$2,800 annually which would support a DDA investment of approximately $25,000.
This project, however, is complicated by the proposed removal of the two large
billboards on top of the structure. The owner has an unexecuted contract with Flack
Advertising that would pay him about $75,000 over the next 20 years. This, then, is the
real basis for the funding request.
Without question, the removal of these billboards would improve the appearance of the
north end of downtown. Only two billboards would remain (directly across the street).
Furthermore, the exterior of this nondescript building would be significantly improved
and might influence other changes in the 200 block of North College.
The request to the DDA amounts to a buyout of the billboard lease. It is important in its
consideration of this proposal that the Board evaluate the public benefit (if any) of the
removal of the billboards as well as the benefit derived by an improved facade. If the
Board concludes that removal of the billboards does not amount to a public benefit it can
suggest funding the project at a lesser amount (i.e. at around $25,000) and allow the
owner to continue earning income from the billboard leases. The board can also find
some public value to the removal of the billboards at a value less than what Mr.
Torgerson is proposing.
Enabling legislation gives the Board the ability "To acquire by purchase, lease, license,
option, gift, grant, devise, or otherwise any property or any interest therein' and "In
determining fair value of real property for such uses, an authority shall take into account
and give consideration to the uses provided in such plan; the restrictions upon and
covenants, conditions, and obligations assumed by the purchaser or lessee; and the
objectives of such plan. I think this means the Board can find that removal of the signs is
a restriction it places upon the owner in return for making facade improvements to his
building and that such a restriction has a cost associated with it for which the owner can
be compensated. Nevertheless billboard lease buyouts are not a typical activity of the
DDA and legal counsel will need to assure that whatever action the board takes is
consistent with enabling legislation and Colorado law.
,dft DAvrowry •
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY'.
19 OLD TOWN SQUARE, SUITE 230
FORT COLLINS, CO 80524
TO: DDA Board of rectors
FROM: Chip Steiner )
DATE: July 8, 2002 `
RE: Linden Street Plan
Telephone (970) 484-2020
Telefox (970) 484-2069
Below is a draft Request for Proposals for the creation of a master plan or Overall
Development Plan for the Linden Street Corridor. It relies heavily on a proposal written
by Kathleen Reavis of the City's Planning Department.
If the Board is comfortable with the draft we will add City refinements (including
purchasing boilerplate), meet with area property owners to ask for their direct
participation (financial if possible and project design coordination), and begin the
appropriation process. Because of City Council's schedule this may end up as a part of
the regular 2003 budget appropriation/adoption cycle.
DRAFT
LINDEN STREET PLAN
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
July, 2002
Project Description.
The Downtown Development Authority is seeking Requests for Proposals for land use
planning and design services in an area generally encompassing a cross composed of
Linden Street and the Poudre River and extending east to west from Lincoln to College
and north to south from Buckingham to Jefferson Street. The DDA is referring to this
plan as an Overall Development Plan and it has several unique components.
1. The design team should treat the area as a single unit as if it were entirely owned
by a single party.
2. Within this planning area there are a number of fixed or existing uses. These will
either be incorporated into the plan as they are currently being used and as they are
currently configured or, if the property owner agrees, they can be placiy$Jawthe planning
and redevelopment design work. These include the following: Ranchway Feeds,
Harmony Mill, Mawson Lumber, Keifer Concrete, Schraeder Oil, the railroads, all the
uses on the north side of Willow, all the uses to the west of Linden and north of the
Poudre River, all the uses fronting the north side of Jefferson Street.
3. Within the planning area there are a number of proposed new or redeveloping
projects. These are the new City Community Center (on the Azadan site), a mixed -use
development on the Oxbow site, a mixed use development on the property currently used
by Sears Trostel, redevelopment of El Burrito, possible redevelopment of Pete Cottier's
property across Linden Street from Sears Trostel, and perhaps the Purina Feeds building
(this property is a part of the Sears Trostel redevelopment proposal but the property
owner's permission must be obtained).
4. The Poudre River Corridor bisects the ODP area and the consulting team will be
responsible for achieving the endorsement of all groups considered to be stakeholders in
the corridor. This will include the DDA, Natural Resources Advisory Board, Sierra Club,
the City's storm water department, adjacent property owners, kayakers, Friends of the
Poudre, the Poudre River Trust. This task is probably the key component in achieving a
successful ODP.
5. The DDA and the consultant will work with proposed development projects
within the area and if possible facilitate their submittal and review simultaneously with
the submittal of this plan to the City.
1. With the assistance of the DDA and City develop a base map that incorporates
all current planning efforts (North College Plan, River Enhancement Plan,
etc.), all existing uses, and all proposed new development or redevelopments.
This will require meeting with and obtaining the concepts from the
developers/property owners who are actively pursuing some kind of
redevelopment. Deliverables: base map with narrative explanations.
Z. Develop a community -wide consensus for the river corridor. Certain
regulations have already been established such as required setbacks. These
regulations serve as the baseline for the consensus -building effort. The
achievement of consensus must be arrived at for all elements of the plan that
can have any impact on the river corridor including bridge crossings,
pedestrian access to the corridor (if any), types and location of adjacent
developments (disregarding existing uses unless property owners provide
permission to explore in concept format, alternative uses). Deliverables:
concept plans and written endorsements from all relevant interest groups.
3. Conduct detailed review and examination of existing transportation, drainage,
environmental, and geotechnical analysis for evaluation of improvement
options.
4. Following the creation of the base map, the establishment of a community -
wide consensus for the river corridor (including endorsements from all
relevant interest groups), and the completion of the review of existing
conditions, develop detailed drawings for public improvements that
coordinate with and enhance existing and proposed uses. Drawings should
include engineering for the streetwepe/roadway/pedestrian and utility
improvements throughout the planning area. Design must accommodate all
2
modes of transportation and address roadway width, alignment, location,
surface treatment, on -street parking, and streetscaWighting features, plus
resolve railroad, drainage, natural features, and utility issues. These elements
need to be determined using the adopted plans as well as coordinated with the
proposed projects for this area. Deliverables: see #5 below.
5. Design detailed intersection improvements for Jefferson/Linden,
Jefferson/Lincoln, Willow/Linden, and Willow/Lincoln, Pinetwillow,
CollegetWillow, LindenBuckingham. It is important that these intersections
are designed to link the planning area with the rest of the central business
district so that pedestrian and other modes of access are significantly
enhanced. However, the consultant should recognize that the planning area is
not intended to be simply a thematic extension of Old Town —it is a stand-
alone district and should be approached as such. Therefore, intersections will
serve as connecting gateways. Deliverables: ODP with narrative support.
6. Develop detailed cost analysis for the proposed improvements and identify
funding mechanisms.
7. The consultant will assist the City's coordination efforts with the railroad
companies, particularly with regard to railroad crossing improvements
scheduled for the Linden and Lincoln crossings.
8. The design effort must include an extensive public involvement process not
just for the river corridor but for the entire planning process. Consultant
should outline its approach to coordinating this process.
9. Take the project through the planning approval process.
10,
The Downtown Development Authority is budgeting $250,000 for this project. Funding
is contingent upon appropriation by City Council. The DDA anticipates the project to be
completed in nine months following notice to proceed.
Downtown River District Improvement Project
Relevant Plans & Policies
1. City of Fort Collins `Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program " (2000)
2. City of Fort Collins "City Plan", (1997, to be updated in 2002-03)
3. City of Fort Collins "Master Street Plan" (2000)
4. City of Fort Collins & CDOT "Jefferson Street/Riverside Avenue (Sb114) Access
Management Plan", (2000)
5. The new "Lrsrimer County Urban Area Street Standards ", (2001).
1. City of Fort Collins "Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Criteria" (1997)
2. City of Fort Collins "Pedestrian Plan" (1996) and `Bicycle Program Plan" (1995)
8.North Front Range Transportation & Air Quality Planning Council and CDOT
"Transportation Alternatives Feasibility Study ", (1999)
9. City of Fort Collins "Brownjlelds Study" (2001)
1. City of Fort Collins "North College Avenue Improvement Project — Phase 1 ", (to be
completed by December 2001)
2. City of Fort Collins "Downtown Plan ", "Downtown Strategic Plan ", & "Parking
Plan " (to be updated in 2002)
Lincoln Avenue bridge, looking west
Linden Street, looking east
Linden Street, looking west
6
0 A
��
r e
�. �
_
�,,
,-
�� _�
+i
�� � � �r , � �`�.
'' "�r��
s„
Willow Street, looking northwest
No Text
Linden Street, looking east
11
�71
oaWrvrowr, •
dft DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
19 OLD TOWN SQUARE, SUITE 230
FORT COLLINS, CO 80524
TO:
DDA Board of Directors
FROM:
Chip Steiner
DATE:
July 8, 2002
RE: Porta-let funding
Telephone (970) 484-2020
Telefox (970) 484-2069
As a part of the effort to reduce the impact of late -night bar attendees, the downtown
Police District has proposed installing porta-potties in the two parking garages. This is a
temporary solution intended to help reduce public urination.
The cost for each unit is $70/month and includes one cleaning and restocking per week.
For two cleanings per week, the cost is $135/month. Waste Management, supplier, of the
units, suggests one cleaning per week would be adequate.
A group of bar owners has verbally agreed to fund 1/3 the cost of these porta-potties with
the DDA and DBA splitting the remaining 2/3rds. Neither the DDA nor DBA have
agreed to this cost -sharing breakdown.
In a conversation last week with Officer Mike Walker and Carey Hewitt, it was suggested
that two additional porta-let units be placed in Old Town Square itself —perhaps behind
Zydecos. This idea has not been addressed by the bar owner group.
It is my recommendation that we participate in this project and that six units be rented
instead of four. It seems reasonable that the bar owners pay 50 percent and the
DDA/DBA split the balance.
(Waste Management has also suggested placing large trash barrels in each parking garage
at a cost of $13 - $15/month for a 96 gallon barrel and $10/month for a 60 gallon barrel.
It would service these at the same time as the porta-lets.
ddoDAMTOWN
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
19 OLD TOWN SQUARE, SUITE 230 Telephone (970) 484-2020
FORT COLLINS. CO 80524 Teletax (970) 484-2069
TO: DDA Board of Di tors
FROM: Chip Steiner
DATE: July 8, 2002
RE: Avery Building Siddwalk repair
Last fall, an overhead hoist being used to affix Christmas lights on Old Town Square
building fagias caused a collapse of the College Avenue sidewalk in front of the Avery
Building. The collapse has been temporarily repaired. Permanently rebuilding the
sidewalk will cost around $22,000 (budget attached).
Through some previous negotiations, the DDA, subject to Board approval, agreed to
share the cost of the permanent repair equally with the City and Paul Wagner, owner of
the building. The DDA's participation was contingent upon denial by Wagner's
insurance company of his claim for repair of the damages (copy attached).
DDA involvement was initiated by the City. It is city policy to split sidewalk repair costs
equally with the owner of the property fronting the sidewalk. However, there is only
$30,000 in this fund and the City preferred not to spend 2/5ths of that entire amount on a
single project. It, therefore sought DDA participation.
I am recommending we honor this commitment and that we use capital improvement
funds from the administrative budget.
2002 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS PROGRAM ESTIMATE Job # 02-
MY OF FORT COLLINB - ENGEVEFdtiNG Priority(I-3)
Addme4: 110.124 North Colka Aw
Pad Wow -493.5454 494.360 Fax
Chip Stirrer/Avid Short • 484.2020
201.01
Troe Root Griudurg
S 113.74
HR
S
203.02
(enadRxmvelWn
$ 62.04
CY
10
S 620.40
203.03
Barrow (Cl 1, C15 ABC, C.LP.)
S 28.95
TON
20
f 579.00
212.01
Sod
S 2.33
SF
$
212.02
Iondeeape Labor
$ 45.53
BR
f
403.50
Taopawy Patching
8 129.25
TON
$
504.01
Qtbbi g OLS.E. Black Wall)
$ 24.82
SFF
$
602.01
Epoxy -Coaled Remfomd Steel
$ 0.80
LBS
1000
$ 800.00
604.10
RecnWnct Inlet Deck -Catch Beam, R&R
S 982.30
EA
S -
604.11
Reconstruct Wa Deck -Catch Bret- Additional Foot Opening
$ 103.40
LF
S
6D4.12
RamNwt Curb hold -4'Opra.&R&R
$ 1,008.15
EA
$
604.13
Rmnmtrkme Wet Dank - Additional Foot Opening
$ 153.10
LF
f
604.14
Type 13-Wetw/Framq Orate& Adpnbble Curb Scatter -R&R
S 1,395.90
HA
$ -
604.15
Contrate Sidewalk Chat-R&.R
$ 992.30
HA
$
604.16
Moral Sidewalk Culvert- 2' Oprwiv& 5r8' Flats -R&R
$ 1,395.90
EA
S
604.17
Meld Sidewalk Culvert -2'Opening YS"Flats -R&R
$ 1,292.50
EA
$
604.19
Add&.d Square Fool, SB' Ph"
$ 113.74
SF
$ -
604.19
Additiond Sq. Food, 'A' Plate
f 103.40
SF
$
608.01
R. ConeretdFlegdone
f 2.07
SF
1850
S 3,929.50
6N.02
Cataete Sidewelb7latwwk(4')
f 3.10
SF
1270
S 3,937.00
608.03
Canmate Sidewalk/Fletwork(6')
f 3.52
SF
$
608.04
C,xrerete Apran(8')
$ 4.14
SF
$
608.05
Coverore Gowspan(8')
S 4.14
SF
$ -
608.08
Vertical Curb, (lutes, & 4' Sidewalk
$ 25.85
LF
$ -
608.09
Vended Curb, Outer, & 6' Sidewalk
$ 27.92
LF
$
609.10
Vertrrl Curb & Getter -No Sidewalk
$ 17.85
LF
S
608.11
Hollywood Curb &Gutter w/4"Sidewalk
$ 18.61
LF
$
608.12
Hollywood Curb &GrWer w/6-Sidewalk
S 20.0
LF
S
608.13
Hollywood or Driveover Curb & (hear -No Sidewalk
f 17.59
LF
$
608.14
Drivaova Curb&Ounce, w/4. Sidewalk
$ 23.79
LF
11
608.15
Drivaover Corb & Guam w/ G' Sidewalk
$ 25.85
LF
$ -
608.16
6'xl 2' Variable HL Curb & Gunner -No Sidewalk
$ 17.58
LF
100
S 1,758.00
608.17
Pedestrian Acme Ramp -Drivaovm Curb
$ 27.92
LF
$
608.19
Padaetrian Acmes Ramp-Vmhcl Curb
$ 27.92
LF
$
608.19
Pedestrian Accra Ramp -Hollywood Curb
$ 24.82
L.F.
$ -
608.20
Fedmtom A. Racal, -HghMck Curb
$ 6.72
S.F.
$
608.21
Connotes Drive Appeow h (6") -All Curb Typee
$ 3.62
SF
$
608.22
Comae Fletwork-1"Additional Dgrlh
S 0.41
SF
$
609.26
Rasa Existing Flegdane-6'Base Bedding
$ 6.72
SF
S -
608.27
Set New Flagstone-6-Base Bedding
S 14.49
SF
S
6W.28
React Existing FLptone-4-Comments Base
$ 9.82
SF
$
608.29
Set New Flagstone -4'Ccwrete Base
$ 16.03
SF
3 -
608.30
Rmet Exuding Flagstone-6-Comets Ere
S 12.41
SF
$ -
608.31
Set New Flevtome-6"Concrete Been
S 17.M
SF
$ -
608.33
Cmaate Troy Grace Border(6' x 6' x 10-)
$ 16.44
LF
72
$ 1,183.68
608.34
Fbamwh Remfucemact0")
$ 0.10
SF
$
608.35
Exprad Aggragde Conorate W4 <500 SF
8 6.98
SF
$ -
fM.36
BW d Aggrogete Coovete(4"),>500 SF
Is 5.95
SF
$
608.37
Flowable Fill
$ 48.09
CY
16
$ 769.28
608.38
8" N.Remfccced Comore Relenting Wall
$ 10.50
SFF
$
608.39
36" N.Refifaced Comore Foeter 10'thick
$ 29.25
LF
S
608.40
8' Non-Revtcced Concrete Struc4nal Slab
$ 19.80
SF
280
$ 5,544.00
Additional Cud - Traffic Cadtrol
Is 0.10
LS
20000.0
$ 2,000.00
Addtioned Cod-Conerate Re-Hvfroed Wall
1 $ 1.00
LS
S
Addticmal Cent-1
$ 115.00 TON
6.0
$ 690.00
$ 10,855.43
$ 21,710.86
Jul 03 02 12:29P Paul Wagner
,
EMC _
May 7, 2002
Paul Wagner
105 Linden Street
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Claim Number:
Our Insured:
Dear Mr. Wagner:
WA2 021 536
AJS/Jim Switzer
970-494-3665 P.1
•
Roger Ford, CPCU
ReakeM Vk9 Preai4ar,l— pMMxer aranM
P.O. Box 441096
Aurora, CO 60044-100
Phone 303.696.0760
FAX 303.696.0633
E-mail roger.).ford@emcim;.w,
vArw.emutireurenx.com
ag(- P33;
Thank you for your cooperation in presenting your claim for damage to your sidewalk on North
College in Fort Collins. We have reviewed the facts of this incident and your claim has received
careful consideration.
Our investigation has not revealed evidence of negligence on the part of our insured to cause any
damage to your sidewalk. Our insured's policy of insurance with us, as it relates to this type of
claim, requires that damage be done to property as a result of negligence on the part of our
insured before any payment can be made.
We must, therefore, respectfully decline payment of your claim for damages.
Sincerely, _�•
Diane W. Timothy \,J
Claims Adjuster
800-696-2362 ext. 263
cc: Jim Switzer, AJS
Renee Stein, Linden/Bartels & Noe Agency
Employers Mutual Casualty Company EMC Reinsurance Company
Employers Modem Life Company EMC Risk Services, Inc.
EMCASCO Insurance Company EMC Undervrtiters, LLC
EMC Property a Casualty Company Dakota Fire Insurance Company
e£A-s0N. N4)f0 CAUsao T1fE-
6AMAiZ'; AIM SwITz£tz-
aa7- y,es7
-APilToreytL
S�rLvtCJ
/� o Go1� o27d-Sc41
�T. c. go 7
N£ W A-s TVL- v To S 7- 01 V OP
Fann and City Insurance Company
Nam{Eon Mutual Insurance COmperry
slims EMCASCo parry of Company
Union Insurance Company of Providence
ddoDAMTOWN
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
19 OLD TOWN SQUARE, SUITE 230
FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Telephone (970) 484-2020
Telefax (970) 484-2069
TO: DDA Board of *ctors
FROM: Chip Steiner
DATE: it 8, 2002
RE: Extension of Interim Contract
The executive director contract will not be ready for review until August. The existing
interim contract permits the Board to extend it on a month -to -month basis following the
initial 90 day period. That initial period ends July 8.
The board is being asked to extend the interim contract for one more month and make the
permanent agreement (which can be reviewed at the August meeting) effective August 8.
ddeD&NTOWN
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
19 OLD TOWN SQUARE, SUITE 230
FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Telephone (970) 484-2020
Telefax (970) 484-2069
TO: DDA Board irectors
FROM: Chip Steine
DATE: July 8, 2002
RE: Other Business
1. Establishing a licensing agreement around retail stores
A group of retailer owners in Old Town are seeking ways to minimize the impact
of transients who congregate in their entryways, smoke, and sometimes intimidate
potential patrons.
One approach DDA legal counsel has suggested is to extend the concept of the
restaurant patio licenses to retail facilities giving them an additional 10 feet of
space that would be under their control. If the City agreed, the idea could also be
applied to other areas of downtown.
2_. Tree grate funding
The City is requesting the DDA acquire up to six tree grates at a maximum cost of
$700 each. The City would build the concrete frames and do all the installation
work. The DDA has frequently funded tree grates in the past. ifthe Board
wishes to participate, funds are available from the administrative capital
improvements line item.
DANNTOWN �
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
19 OLD TOWN SQUARE, SUITE 230
FORT COLLINS, CO 80524
TO: DDA Board of Directors
FROM: Chip Steine
DATE: it 5, 2002^y
RE: Updates
1. Downtown Strategic Plan.
Telephone (970) 484-2020
Telefax (970) 484-2069
Since the last Board meeting both the Technical Committee and the Citizen.
Advisory Committee have met with the Downtown Strategic Plan consulting
team. Below is a synopsis of those meetings.
What has been found so far: PUMA (Progressive Urban Management
Associates) has reviewed all the plans relevant to downtown and has read the
Gibbs report. A retail audit is being conducted (by UMC) to clarify where retail
is in relation to the market. On -street intercept interviews and phone interviews
are also being conducted.
PUMA made the following specific "first -pass" observations:
• The public -private investment balance is out of whack. Need more
activity from the private sector;
• Bars are a flash point. If they belong in the mix of goods and services
offered by downtown then a method must be developed to incorporate
them (Brad supplied a copy of Downtown Denver's Good Neighbor
Policy which is attached);
• Need stronger linkages to CSU;
• Regulatory environment may be an issue (not necessarily agreed to by the
City);
• The "psychography" of the "north of Prospect -south of Prospect
phenomenon. Thinking there may be a whole segment of the Fort Collins
population that knows little or nothing about downtown;
• Split City Council along pro -business and environmental lines. Think
downtown is a good place to reconcile these differences;
• Parking management (but not the number of spaces available);
• Security issues (related to bar issue);
• No significant economic underpinnings (anchors) in downtown —no big
employers, no civic/cultural attractions;
• Retail mix may be out of whack;
• Something needs to be done with the area north and east of Jefferson
Street.
Transportation:
• Need to coordinate with other city transportation plans;
• Transportation and parking management need to respond to the market
analysis of the DSP study;
• Parking is an issue and always will be;
• Parking capacity is adequate —management is the issue;
• Need better east -west bicycle connections;
• Mason Street plans will effect access;
• Need to reassess one-way couplet;
• Need to look at alternative transportation modes internal to the CBD;
• Freight mobility —this has to do with ease of delivery, not another look at
a truck bypass.
Urban Design issues:
• Mason Street connection;
• Connections to CSU;
• Signage—e.g. a sign at the interstate indicating the downtown exit and
direction to downtown;
• Colorado 14/railroad tracks barrier between downtown and the northeast;
• River;
• Maintenance;
• Golf course relationship to downtown.
Issues raised by technical and citizen committees:
• Providing useful merchandise for people who live in and around
downtown (socks, detergent, etc.);
• Homeless/panhandling;
• Public restrooms;
• Cleanliness/maintenance;
• Employee parking on street;
• Increased residential and resulting traffic impact;
• Access to CSU;
• Late night security/late night "evacuation" of bar patrons;
• Impact of nighttime crowd on daytime crowd;
• Hotel/conference center-250 to 350 rooms, 25,000 sf hi -tech conference
center;
• More cultural and art venues to balance bars and entertainment;
• Downtown vacancies;
• More downtown employment opportunities;
• DT circulator;
• Commuter rail;
• Consultants should meet with residential neighborhoods;
• Gentrification of downtown
• Building height;
• Parking along Mason Street from Oak northward.
2. Mountain Avenue Properties (Steeles)
Engineering and utility infrastructure issues are being worked out with the City to
ensure that when the project proceeds to Planning and Zoning board review
(tentatively scheduled for October 3) it will have City staff s endorsement
3. Rhythms
Owners of this project are working through some financial problems and
anticipate having construction completed in about six weeks. DDA has provided
the owners with the checklist of items necessary to the execution of an agreement.
4. Empire Hotel.
The Empire is under contract to DeSantis & Co, LLC out of Longmont and being
represented by Berin Wachsmann (who used to own Aggie Theater) of COLA
Investments, Inc. COLA may be a financial partner in the project. They are
currently in the due dillegence stage and debating uses. Almost certainly the main
floor will be retail with a restaurant/bar. The second floor may be devoted to
office space with the third floor being for -sale residential units ($100,000 -
$200,000). Consideration is also being given to the hotel plan developed by the
Everitt Companies.
5. Retec.
Retec is a large environmental engineering company (60 employees) currently
located in Old Town Square. It needs more space and is moving out of downtown
to the Center for Advanced Technology.
yy afilui Vexi'
a&
� �t ?igktv�i6# 9 6it9ii^>
;s
0
J
N
i
D
x
D
r
w
o=
m
N ry M
N
rn p `
Q N Y
z
m
0
G OD 0 x
m00��
❑
I
3 $
m� o A
❑
A
❑
0
L]
A
c
I
x
tll
9
D
r
w r
D
O N
❑
�' rt O
N S d
p
so:: ns
o
rt
❑
v
❑
D
r
v
❑
z
z
❑
z
m
z
°
m
°
o �
A
"?
m
R°N°ft.
o �,
N
"_'
o
o 0 R
Z
3
t9 N
t11
n N
❑
CD
$
D
z
D
0
z
0
0
A
0
v �n gp �u0Np� 3� m a>> GIa L1J ioa F
� . F
ri m flmm°m3,a �a sb=y3 � F3�
�' < 0n @
D'
�wmQ m?v�nm f fD per'
qq++ 0 0 ••ri r1Jdi = �. d O �' b l=_l p d O J N J O O
ffi SOS S S3� ow a<
ET
J s
a Q a oVcg d J c s b o R '^ o = H z
v Z c n G n li a o =' ? E o
=g a�� mq� �6ET
=an
anT�;�Ns0aSr.�6
30
olfS
c_m�x
o
o0
ooq,F_ao 3m so
gE23=
o9a
'�Nm� '°d2R
0, 0n z m �
b o:E
m CR,°'°s.
d $
�ocDom `1:m e�� =tea Apo
6 O
0- p�
yi a� N
m
0
T
m
0 oN
L W
O =
O N u
N G U Y
tOtpp
L 6 O
•
cM
v A
gc
C
to
`'�
`°
•Lop -2
v- L E
•
V 4... Y Z v =
C L
8
c u C
pC
OAn O u �• c
p'o
p• v
In
S r a4 A
n 2� O v 0
30
L U v
o v S
C v p O N S
p E V
72
m
2
m 0 y
L
°4 u
v 'L$ m e
C c
O
O
YJ
v m w
0i
cq v cq cq
O
m V U=
U
o
17 L L L O N
U v v O O p
p Y S c v
v O y c�
O
U U L
m m
o1
O
E
� 'a E
Q
N O
_
N
- c
N'
oA 3
O
o2
o m
v y
v
m d
O
_ E
U
OQ
Z O
y
v .�
o
>
c •,`-� ,E
L
m c
-
c
`h
v C
V
�
`
O :a m h
m YI
c u Y 3
3
d o
`
M
N
EjL
o a o x R d Tod d o n rm
O O < fD S v ° ry Oa O» fD
• rya O -.{ o rt O . • • • . m r1 N O o o. i Or
On W?
o 3 o_ O d= 3 0 T y v d °�° H do �i O n vs,' d 0 3 n. f ,cN., O o f 0
CIQ
� 6'i o rt �°. y 3 v D_ � y O do =�� O•-, rt N d n� Si ^CT
!—
d0
�' o � F � W � °. ° rNo o � 3 S •• ° � c n � � � o � ids. n d � Al
c nC.
tio' e�
N n c 5 Li �• W O frr��9 _ n o �. O 0'o O
d Cl m E g. O d d Qc d
d= L.
O^ A rt O rJ Vo O E O in �p •_ C
N n ry d. r O^
� O T N r T ry [i 3 O
m D
o° v d �w $ o E o' n a N D 3
H 0'a tlo w d 0'0 0 0 O O- d d y O in rt P. "•
f
d S N o e o- d rt o
S
rD
J
L6
Z
ti
A
N
rA v g
E 3 0 0. ,� o. o E E ,pT .vc c o c � .0E
!c vP 4-5° EiE
o L .5 v c o E d w I c�aa tt s ,,..c�c
5 p 3 I- o A .5 u
c 3 c Z c
v L Q �coO d oot0o =c _ vtOi
�°
Q Op E
N C Y 0 ENu
N U
G.: NCN G O c Q Ly N 0. o f V 0 Ori u
Z N C C O LEA w ul L y L 'L L O Y
13 O x O t t u v o« E E
_ v i
v G N v O B
G � L � J O OO y C C
F
, w -EOJ U
ac vL. p �p C LI. v, c C v v N v « 2 d
0
Q .N Lyq cE v FL- o. C. LL
v o —'p 0 0
0 t° `° ryry{Up _ 0 u
o- vv`Z sec Nm A
+1 c N 3 U OE S
eA c O v 4 mE
M
p=[�
v
. 3 c
p°
ai pA y p L V U c L `p` y �'p y)
N 0L. W 3 J= Lp L«
N U o4
U v c
v N
m ti, m e A .a '° =$ E N s v a� QO p •vp p` 5 ecA
u L p u oA .0 u J O �° u
i2 3.12 `o f
O` O O
eA O A u a .G O` in
u C v Z N O S O
v N V `
:J A u' S d o. g v cp I'a 3 u o N o•';a
T N JN C LT O p U ,`yJ d j -EE N L 0
v E E y ."� v 'gin �« nE= °�� •C Y c U cc ry o
'S 0 O o cA
f`V
O` E c E N a _O � 5 A v U 'U-- H �O c 0 J1� c c 2 v O O � L v IIJJ �0 y
yc o 0 u E �@@ `S d s ,o L`u °'A `• y
d v p- E o v E m°� 5° 5 o E >, E u O s o p 0 o u
y C O Y N Yn N C C C v y 0 U `p �'.'J.� v E u O
O 0�
u v 0 0 0 0 >p c `� $ c u c u N A 0 -0Z O o 5 y s ON 72
EE¢� a• v o =bA� �° ^`- v c •E
172
� $^c � L O p G
cL C7 2 c 0 0
1 .1
rl
�4
C C
� S
E 'E
° o
o
o E E
h
s Q
u
c u O y �%
u
u
L� ry N s s C a
y E '3
O C
V N
V�
dL E v y o
dt �
N C
bQ
n CCry � � Y O
a
E�d���
C
N C
O C v L
O
CD
°o 0
=n Fr�.��o=
dQ c Q g=w8o:8
C. CD �i• g 3nM.d c
OM.
ONOoo =°c (7 d0 w• f9� d
O O
wOrnwrn .S O ..y' gw
m =3n os
N
�
QZ
_ d
_ n O O __ n �❑ Ow c O m
On — ° �i w Z N d
rtrt �
W W W W V W W N N •• �O G °
000000 0
o o o w� o c' w �' �� a
n o �o -- a o
O
O 0 0 V n N d c' O
m
0a A
rn n v o n ry n n y 0
c �- nD m 0RiE
m ' n m ,vul
< m
2' <, `< H 3 2' — O z C ❑ ani 'o' 2 c= v_� f 9 S y ,a v ~ ❑
o n o o o CF.iD C v �� d p cv_c S C
a w Z= F n �p w n o O IY
O `< ni py v ? N. 0 rt �. o n d m
O d d
o� a a? as a d3 m o o ga s S
V' = O
m
. d ^ c `^ m n r°o = o ° _ = �. °fie Cn
< o d adva v � o `N° aVp v 5 = rv'o r
❑ y d N n= Va rF C
N n O=o
?
0 o d CD n D o ❑
n d y= •ON N m y
ry ry ?n _. d .. a° � lS0 I ^ Z
O = ac = c N O
T wH
w n S_'i O
N L
= N ry �. = En p, o
� R .
LA
Z
J
m
NW
LL
m
LL
•
F
0
Z
y>
`o E
o
3$ a
m
s
E
c
2
o
_o
E
'C
up Q
N
CQ
.c
u
R
Z
®
Q O O
L
N
C
Ol
C L it
Z
Vf
c
v
Z
a
h
u
u
c
`o
c
3
DID
c A
A C
_
L
�p�
yry�
eq
o. v
.c
p
E
L � E
_
w!®
2 o.
o .E00
� 'd
u
��
�
W
t
�f
�
p
h
p
�
v
J
<
Q
N R
O L R pA
O
C
!.f
(Wyu
c
v
�
,�J
L
c
id c E
-'
c R cE
v
R
R c
w w
w
IL°
u
t°
0 /w@
®
a
E A
.Q E
.a
O
U -O
.O in
m
O N
u�
O
v
0
o
O
u ;
M
v
QN
-=uo`R
<L
M
y
a'
V1
l°cu
cu
m
U` p 2 n v o_E L 3 c p 30 V E O =O L u y H
is v v L o '^o lU �`
4J ��� Q C p. G= C R F u N �` L' E L C 'tO ✓ G9 O� jd
5 > E u u b eAR v o
L'M
N V^ L U N fO C C N
JQ G� N C y O u
�,+ ° `3 O O E 3 QQ : c u m
O o c u .� u— `j v a c v�_ c ° O v
p A 5 v v r i'i v E R �' 3 5 0 W A
u c v c _� cc w
N N _
O R L ° �� � � w U J C v ❑ V E E N >�
O— v O w y .V. O C ul • L C> E L M
W O u_oS
ii. m O c d
z 'u5 9�° E
E
� oEq 5 v tO
c vu 3� ❑ � y c c� E a `C � Y o
W EE
v E E c v
d-u q� c u N°Q a E
4� Oc_4,Q p v
R p
❑L� 4! L L V E O
oc
F- c R `� ~ C LT `
y E y E W
o o E c o v v N 55 E o R v
u -Ei `o E
D
N
n
r)
Ln�
w-
2
°
°
°
°
a
�
_
Z
^
y
�
m
Q-
Z
C)
z
F
C)
7
m
G
S
d
�
D
°
G7
o
wo
f9
0 2
�
z
O
N
D
0
v
°o
n
°
m
�
� 0
00
No Text