Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/09/2020 - Landmark Preservation Commission - Agenda - Work SessionPage 1 Meg Dunn, Chair Meeting to be conducted remotely. Alexandra Wallace, Co-Vice Chair See below for instructions on how Mollie Bredehoft, Co-Vice Chair to attend online or by phone. Michael Bello Kurt Knierim Elizabeth Michell Kevin Murray Staff Liaison: Anne Nelsen Karen McWilliams Vacant Seat Historic Preservation Manager Work Session December 9, 2020 5:30 PM Landmark Preservation Commission AGENDA Pursuant to City Council Ordinance 079, 2020, a determination has been made by the Chair after consultation with the City staff liaison that conducting the hearing using remote technology would be prudent. This remote Landmark Preservation Commission meeting will be available online via Zoom or by phone. No one will be allowed to attend in person. The meeting will be available to join beginning at 5:15 p.m. Participants should try to join prior to the 5:30 p.m. start time. JOIN ONLINE: You will need an internet connection on a laptop, computer, or smartphone, and may join the meeting through Zoom at https://zoom.us/j/96309435724. (Using earphones will greatly improve your audio). Keep yourself on muted status. JOIN BY PHONE: Please dial 253-215-8782 and enter Webinar ID 963 0943 5724. Keep yourself on muted status. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: No public comment is allowed during work sessions. Members of the public may join the meeting but will remain muted throughout the duration of the meeting. The December 16, 2020 Landmark Preservation Commission regular meeting will be held remotely and not in-person. Information on remotely participating in the December 16, 2020 Landmark Preservation Commission regular meeting is contained in the agenda for the December 16, 2020 meeting available at https://www.fcgov.com/cityclerk/landmark- preservation.php. Members of the public wishing to submit documents, visual presentations, or written comments for the Commission to consider regarding any item on the agenda must email them to kmcwilliams@fcgov.com at least 24 hours prior to the December 16, 2020 meeting. Packet Pg. 1 Fort Collins is a Certified Local Government (CLG) authorized by the National Park Service and History Colorado based on its compliance with federal and state historic preservation standards. CLG standing requires Fort Collins to maintain a Landmark Preservation Commission composed of members of which a minimum of 40% meet federal standards for professional experience from preservation-related disciplines, including, but not limited to, historic architecture, architectural history, archaeology, and urban planning. For more information, see Article III, Division 19 of the Fort Collins Municipal Code. The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. Video of the meeting will be broadcast at 1:00 p.m. the following day through the Comcast cable system on Channel 14 or 881 (HD). Please visit http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/ for the daily cable schedule. The video will also be available for later viewing on demand here: http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php. •CALL TO ORDER •ROLL CALL •REVIEW OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2020 AT 5:30 P.M. VIA ZOOM (Please see the agenda for the December 16, 2020 meeting for information on how to join that meeting.) CONSENT 1.CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 18, 2020 DISCUSSION 2.REPORT ON STAFF DESIGN REVIEW DECISIONS FOR DESIGNATED PROPERTIES 3.126 S. WHITCOMB ST: APPEAL OF STAFF DECISION ON DESIGN REVIEW (CONTINUANCE FROM OCTOBER 2020) 4.140 N MCKINLEY AVENUE (ROBERT AND ORPHA BUXTON HOUSE AND ATTACHED GARAGE) – REAR ADDITION – CONCEPTUAL LANDMARK DESIGN REVIEW 5.711 PETERSON, THE W.E. BOYD RESIDENCE (ADDITION) – DESIGN REVIEW 6.CITY OF FORT COLLINS HOUSING STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE •BOARD TOPICS 1.Sustainability & Historic Preservation Workshop Series – Preservation & Storytelling Part 2 2.PastForward (National Trust for Historic Preservation) Conference Follow-up, Part 2 3.Updates to Single-Family Demolition Notification Procedure 4.LPC Work Plan Progress & Priorities •OTHER BUSINESS •ADJOURNMENT Packet Pg. 2 Roll Call – Work Session Landmark Preservation Commission Date: 12/9/20 Bello x Bredehoft absent Dunn x Knierim x Michell x Murray x Nelsen x Wallace x Rose x Board Topic 1, Page 1 DATE: STAFF: December 9, 2020 Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner WORK SESSION ITEM 1 Landmark Preservation Commission SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Sustainability & Historic Preservation Workshop Series – Preservation & Storytelling Part 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is an informational presentation and discussion (as part of an ongoing series requested by the Commission) regarding the intersection of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties and the “Triple Bottom Line” approach to sustainability that has been adopted by the City (as well as other government and preservation organizations). This session is building off of the discussion held at the November 12 Work Session. The staff presentation will review in brief some of the information presented in November, review some of the LPC suggestions about how to improve storytelling in the City’s preservation program, Staff is seeking input from the Commission regarding this topic, including suggested avenues for further research, projects, recommendations for program improvements, and actions Commissioners intend to take in 2021 on behalf of the Commission to help address those issues or implement those improvements. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Presentation Packet Pg. 3 Preservation & Storytelling, Part 2 Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner Recap • Preservation began as a primarily private affair, focused on civic sites or sites of powerful, wealthy men • Developed into a formal, government-involved set of programs at different levels over the 1900s. • Equity and inclusion shortcomings since the beginning 2 1 2 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 4 Stories Shape People’s Connection to Place • Storytelling is a local process • Affects how people view their community and their place in it • Storytelling is what gives places power • Even with architecturally-significant sites, the story behind the architecture matters most 3 Romero House/Museo de las Tres Colonias, 425 10th Street McDaniels family residence, 317 Cherry St. What Stories Should We Be Telling and How? • What aspects of Fort Collins’ story should we be telling? • Who needs to tell that story? Who should we talk to? • What are the best ways to tell those stories? Landmarking? Education programs? 4 3 4 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 5 Results from LPC WS – Nov. 12 • Meg Dunn • More oral history engagement to capture more human stories beyond city directories and newspapers • More focus on 1940s-1960s beyond veterans/GI Bill • Model future education programming off of successful neighbor/national programs • Elizabeth Michell • Need to research post-WWII immigration histories, especially from Asia • Need to improve network and ask for help to avoid ignoring or dismissing stories (take the extra steps) •Jim Rose • Remember to include focus on indigenous people of northern Colorado • Incorporate material culture into interpretation of built environment 5 Now What? • Staff commitments • Working research of underrepresented groups/aspects of history into ongoing research plan and grant application schedule • Ramping up education programming including social equity-focused events (virtual for now) • LPC commitments? • What are some steps the LPC can take in 2021 to improve its role in storytelling and social equity? • What are some steps you as individual commissioners can, or would like to, take on your own in 2021? 6 5 6 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 6 Board Topic 2, Page 1 DATE: STAFF: December 9, 2020 Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner WORK SESSION ITEM 2 Landmark Preservation Commission SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION PastForward (National Trust for Historic Preservation) Conference Follow-up, Part 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is part two of an item introduced at the November Work Session (Nov. 12). Several staff members and LPC members were able to attend the 2020 annual (virtual) conference of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, PastForward. This item is an opportunity to discuss key takeaways, and potential program improvements based on the sessions available and priorities established by the NTHP. Staff is seeking input and encouraging LPC members to develop personalized action items related to their volunteer work on the Commission that would support recommendations from PastForward and be consistent with the social equity goals established in the LPC’s 2021 Work Plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. Discussion Slide Packet Pg. 7 PastForward 2020 - Takeaways• What were your key takeaways from PastForward?• Are there ideas that seem important/useful to implement here in FortCollins?• About social equity?• About other topics?• What ideas should be, or seem, actionable in the near future?•For staff?• For the LPC?1BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet Pg. 8 December 9, 2020 Page 1 Board Topic 3, Page 1 DATE: STAFF: December 9, 2020 Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner WORK SESSION ITEM 3 Landmark Preservation Commission SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Updates to Single-Family Demolition Notification Procedure EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Since March of 2019, staff has implemented a policy for notifying the public regarding demolitions of single-family properties over fifty years of age that are to be new single-family dwellings Please note that demolitions in other types of developments (i.e., for duplexes, for large-scale development, etc.) are already subject to the City’s Land Use Code, including Section 3.4.7 regarding cultural resources). It is the current policy of the City to provide a process for notifying residents about the demolition of properties over fifty years of age. This item is to notify the Commission of staff’s proposed updates to the demolition notification procedure for single-family properties over fifty years of age. The demolition notification process is not directed by Code, but has been implemented to respond to concerns from City Council, the Landmark Preservation Commission, and a citizen’s advisory committee for preservation code updates over the course of 2018-2019. Current Procedure Current procedure is that when a single-family property is proposed for demolition for new single-family construction, and is over fifty years of age, a notification process is initiated that varies depending on whether the property has an up-to-date determination of eligibility for City Landmark status. Surveys are considered up-to-date if they have been produced within the last five years. The primary purpose of the notification policy is to make residents aware of a proposed demolition of an older property and provide them with the opportunity to seek protection of buildings they deem historically important. A notification process can serve as a disincentive to demolition and supports City goals related to preserving historic resources, conserving the existing built environment, potentially preserving affordable housing stock, reducing solid waste related to construction, and reducing environmental costs related to new construction. In many cases, local governments also utilize demolition review of properties over fifty years of age as a “safety net” for older properties that may have heretofore undocumented but relevant importance to the community. If there is no current historic resource survey on file, a survey is required at the expense of the applicant/owner (current fee is $750). If the property is found not eligible for Landmark status, no further action or notification is required for the project to move ahead. If the property is found to be Landmark eligible, once preliminary plans for a single-family dwelling are received by Historic Preservation Services, a three-week notification period begins during which staff informs the Commission electronically, posts the property on the website and in the Coloradoan, and places a notice sign on the property in a visible location. All entities with nomination authority under Municipal Code 14-31 can initiate a nomination within that time period. Once the period is closed, if no nomination has been forthcoming, then demolition and new construction can proceed without further involvement. Packet Pg. 9 December 9, 2020 Page 2 Board Topic 3, Page 2 Proposed New Procedure Based on concerns about this interim policy, specifically the cost to the owner for producing the survey, staff is proposing eliminating that portion of the current policy and adjusting the notification period. The survey requirement would be removed and replaced with a cursory staff report based on easily-available information. The notification period would be extended to open when the applicant submits preliminary plans for new construction (confirming it is for a new single-family dwelling) and close at the earliest available Landmark Preservation Commission meeting. A new agenda item, similar to Item #2 for staff approved projects, would be added to the regular agenda, and provide a period of public comment or to initiate a non-owner-driven nomination for Landmark designation under Municipal Code 14-31. The item would be identified as “for possible action” and the notifications (sign posting, website posting, and posting in the Coloradoan) would continue. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft of proposed new Single-Family Demolition Notification Procedure 2. Staff Presentation Packet Pg. 10 Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.4250 preservation@fcgov.com fcgov.com/historicpreservation Historic Preservation Services DRAFT Revised Demolition Notification Procedure for Single-Family, Non- Designated Properties Presented to Landmark Preservation Commission @ December 9, 2020 Work Session for comment Demolition review and notification provides an opportunity to ensure important historic, architectural, and cultural resources are not lost without consideration by the community, pursuant to Section 14-6 of Municipal Code. This process provides for a public notification process for full or substantial demolition of a single-family property over fifty years of age, and an opportunity for community members to take action to request Landmark designation of properties of historic significance through designation, as provided by City Code. Demolition permits for primary buildings on properties over fifty years of age require the following steps: 1.Contact Historic Preservation Division and provide preliminary plans for new construction indicating new construction is for a single-family detached residence. Note: During the subsequent notification review period, no abatement can occur on the property. 2.Upon receipt of preliminary plans, the property is included on the next available Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) agenda for formal notification to the LPC. The notification period begins during which: a.the property is posted and the public is provided notification along with a link to the survey results. b.During that period, up to and ending at the LPC meeting at which the item is to be reviewed, three or more residents of the city, or the LPC by resolution, may choose to submit an application for landmark designation to "preservation@fcgov.com based on the procedure outlined in Section 14-31 of the Fort Collins Municipal Code. c.At the meeting, staff will provide a brief summary of any easily-accessible historical information about the property for the public’s and LPC’s consideration. d.Any action on the application for demolition must occur during the notification period prior to the LPC meeting on which the item is scheduled, or at the meeting. BOARD TOPIC 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 11 3. Within six months of submitting plans under step 3, owners must submit a permit application for the job site consistent with the initial plans provided (subject to appropriate Planning, Zoning, and Building Code review). If a permit application is not received within the six-month period, a new notification period will be required. 4. Assuming no non-consensual historic designation has been received by the City and the building permit application is in order, any holds on the demolition permit by Historic Preservation Services are cleared. Note: Demolition permits for secondary structures on properties over fifty years of age are not subject to this demolition review process unless the property is designated as historic under the definitions in Chapter 14, Article IV of Municipal Code. BOARD TOPIC 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 12 Update to Demolition Notification (Single Family) Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Manager Landmark Preservation Commission, Dec. 9, 2020 Single-Family Demo Review/Notification: Purpose • Demolition of single-family dwellings 50+ years of age • Posting/noticing: Opportunity for community to be aware of changes to neighborhood • Possibility of involuntary landmark designation application -Preservation of important places -Secondary benefits: conserve the built environment, reduce solid waste, potentially promote affordable housing, reduce environmental costs of new construction • Can serve as a “safety net” for heretofore undocumented historic resources • Not a substitute for proactive survey 2 1 2 BOARD TOPIC 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Updated 12-9-20 Packet Pg. 12 History of Single-Family Review Prior to 2019 Code Revisions: • Demolition/Alteration Review Process • All exterior changes to all 50+ year old dwellings • Single-family review process: • Decisions on Eligibility by LPC Chair and CDNS Director • Posting and public noticing • If eligible, required fully approved plans; LPC hearing • Delay only • Not sustainable 3 History of Single-Family Review 2019 Code Revisions: • Eliminated review of most single-family dwellings: • Still review national/state register; changes of use; landmarks • Review based on Secretary of the Interior Standards • Still post/notice demolitions -discussions with Council, LPC and CAC • Post based on eligibility • 3-week process • 2020 added up-to-date survey • Adds fee and additional delay of 4-6 weeks 4 3 4 BOARD TOPIC 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Updated 12-9-20 Packet Pg. 13 2021 Code Revisions • Remove survey requirement • Staff reports will be cursory only • Adjust notification requirement • Post all demolitions • Use LPC meeting to enhance public awareness for demolitions – may increase delay by up to 2 weeks • Bring proposed code revision to Council in 2021 • Coordinate w/ Climate Future & Housing Strategic Plans 5 5 BOARD TOPIC 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Updated 12-9-20 Packet Pg. 14 Board Topic 4, Page 1 DATE: STAFF: December 9, 2020 Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Manager WORK SESSION ITEM 4 Landmark Preservation Commission SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION LPC Work Plan - Progress and Priorities EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Code requires all boards and commissions to file work plans on or before September 30 for the following year. According to the Boards and Commissions Manual, work plans should set out major projects and issues for discussion for the following year. The LPC adopted the attached 2020 work plan at its October 16, 2019 meeting. Consideration of pending priorities associated with the work plan will be a regular work session discussion item. The regular recurrence of this discussion item is intended to provide the Commission with the opportunity to measure ongoing progress and identify action items. ATTACHMENTS 1. LPC 2020 Work Plan Packet Pg. 16 City of ktColli� Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue DATE: TO: CC: P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 970.224.6134-fax fcgov.com MEMORANDUM October 16, 2019 Susan Gutowsky, Council Liaison Darin Atteberry, City Manager Delynn Coldiron, City Clerk n,rfL,{>-FROM: Meg Dunn, Chair, Landmark Preservation Commission Landmark Preservation Commission 2020 Work Plan RE: Overview of the Landmark Preservation Commission (Est 1968): •Federally authorized Certified Local Government (CLG} since 1991. CLG status: o Authorizes LPC to administer state and federal preservation regulations, notably Section 106 Review and Compliance for all projects with federal licensing, permitting, or funding. Ex: MAX bus system, Linden Street improvements, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG}, flood mitigation, telecommunications. o Enables residents to participate in the 20% Colorado State Tax Credit program. o Provides a dedicated pool of grant funding: Fort Collins has received over $200,000 in CLG grants for training, surveys, building preservation, and community education and outreach. o Requires enforcement of appropriate state and local legislation for the designation and protection of historic properties, consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards. o Requires on-going survey of historic resources. •Nine-member board, at least 40% of whom must have professional expertise in the fields of historic preservation, architectural history, architecture, archaeology, or closely related fields: o Commission professional expertise includes: Architecture (Nelson, Paecklar, Simpkins); Landscape Architecture (Bredehoft); Archeology (Gensmer); Finance (Bello); Historic Preservation (Murray, Wallace); and Education (Dunn). •Final decision-maker on: o Requests for alterations to properties designated on the National Register, Colorado State Register, and as Fort Collins Landmarks o Determinations of eligibility for Fort Collins Landmark designation o Allocation of Landmark Rehabilitation Loan funds •Makes recommendations: o To Council on Fort Collins Landmark designations; o To the Colorado State Review Board on nominations to the National and State Register o To Decision Makers on compatibility of developments adjacent to historic properties •Advises Council on the identification and significance of historic resources, threats to their preservation, and methods for their protection •Advises Council and staff about policies, incentives and regulations for historic preservation. BOARD TOPIC 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 17 BOARD TOPIC 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 18 BOARD TOPIC 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 19