The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About8/13/2020 - Zoning Board Of Appeals - Summary Agenda - Zba August 13, 2020 Summary Agenda Packet Ralph Shields, Chair Shelley LaMastra, Vice Chair David Lawton John McCoy Taylor Meyer Ian Shuff Butch Stockover Council Liaison: Ross Cunniff Staff Liaison: Noah Beals LOCATION: Meeting will be held virtually The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 13, 2020 8:30 AM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AGENDA Participation for this remote Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be available online or by phone. No one will be allowed to attend in person. Public Participation (Online): Individuals who wish to address the Zoning Board of Appeals via remote public participation can do so through Zoom at https://zoom.us/j/91817066407. Individuals participating in the Zoom session should also watch the meeting through that site. The meeting will be available to join beginning at 8:15 a.m. on July 9, 2020. Participants should try to sign in prior to 8:30 a.m. if possible. For public comments, the Chair will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to speak at that time. Staff will moderate the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Board or Commission. In order to participate: Use a laptop, computer, or internet‐enabled smartphone. (Using earphones with a microphone will greatly improve your audio). You need to have access to the internet. Keep yourself on muted status. If you have any technical difficulties during the hearing, please email kscheidenhelm@fcgov.com. Public Participation (Phone): If you do not have access to the internet, you can call into the hearing via phone. The b di l i 253 215 8782 669 900 9128 ih bi ID 918 1706 6407 Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 August 13, 2020  CALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL  APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING  CITIZEN PARTICIPATION (Items Not on the Agenda)  APPEALS FOR VARIANCE TO THE LAND USE CODE 1. APPEAL ZBA200009 Address: 144 2nd St. Owner/Petitioner: Michael Rossman Zoning District: R-L Code Section: 3.8.19(A)(6); 4.4(D)(2)(d) Project Description: The variance request is for an addition to the existing structure. The addition requires the following two variances: 1. A 2 foot encroachment into the required 5 foot side-yard setback 2. A 6 inch encroachment for a required 2.5 foot setback for an eave. 2. APPEAL ZBA200027 Address: 2301 Limousin Ct. Owner/Petitioner: Derek Smith Zoning District: R-L Code Section: 3.8.11(C)(1); 3.8.11(C)(2) Project Description: This request is to build a 6 foot tall fence between the front of the building and front property line. The maximum height allowed in the front yard is 4 feet. The meeting will be available beginning at 8:15 a.m. Please call in to the meeting prior to 8:30 a.m., if possible. For public comments, the Chair will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to speak at that time – phone participants will need to hit *9 to do this. Staff will be moderating the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Committee. Once you join the meeting: keep yourself on muted status. If you have any technical difficulties during the hearing, please email kscheidenhelm@fcgov.com. Documents to Share: If residents wish to share a document or presentation, the Staff Liaison needs to receive those materials via email by 24 hours before the meeting. Individuals uncomfortable or unable to access the Zoom platform or unable to participate by phone are encouraged to participate by emailing general public comments you may have to nbeals@fcgov.com. The Staff Liaison will ensure the Board or Commission receives your comments. If you have specific comments on any of the discussion items scheduled, please make that clear in the subject line of the email and send 24 hours prior to the meeting. As required by City Council Ordinance 079, 2020, a determination has been made by the chair after l h h ff l h d h h hl ld b Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 August 13, 2020 3. APPEAL ZBA200028 Address: 4610 Player Dr. Owner: Dan and Brianna Brown Petitioner: Jeff Hansen Zoning District: U-E Code Section: 3.5.2(E)(5) Project Description: This is for a variance to build an 852 square foot addition to the existing 768 square foot garage for a total of 1620 square feet, 420 square feet over the allowed 1200 square feet. 4. APPEAL ZBA200029 Address: 320 Willow St Owner/Petitioner: Lance DeBar Zoning District: D Code Section: 4.16(B)(1) Project Description: In October of 2018 the Zoning Board of Appeals approved a variance request to rebuild a shed in its existing location. The structure was not built before the approval expired. Since the last approval the property was re-zoned and the required setbacks changed. This is an application for the same location that was previously approved. The variance will allow a 4 foot encroachment into the required 5 foot rear yard setback. 5. APPEAL ZBA200030 Address: 2720 Nottingham Sq. Owner/Petitioner: Sue Kenney Zoning District: R-L Code Section: 4.4(D)(2)(b Project Description: This is a request for the front deck to encroach 6 feet into the required 20 foot front setback, leaving a 14 foot setback.  OTHER BUSINESS  ADJOURNMENT From: Ralph Shields <rshields@bellisimoinc.com> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 9:58 AM To: Noah Beals <nbeals@fcgov.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Zoning Board of Appeals (August Public Hearing) I agree with your statement, thank you Noah. Thanks Ralph Shields 970.231.7665 From: Noah Beals <nbeals@fcgov.com> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 2:54 PM To: Ralph Shields <rshields@bellisimoinc.com> Cc: Jennifer Luther <jluther@fcgov.com>; Kacee Scheidenhelm <kscheidenhelm@fcgov.com> Subject: Zoning Board of Appeals (August Public Hearing) Hello Chair‐person Shields, Since May the ZBA has conducted a remote hearing. These remote hearings appear to have met the needs of the board members and the applicants. The concerns that prompted these remote meetings have not dissipated.  Health risks during a world‐wide pandemic  Difficulties in coordinating logistics for an in‐person meeting or hybrid of such It is staff recommendation to continue with a remote hearing for the August meeting of the ZBA. Please respond to this email with your agreement with this recommendation or other suggestions for this hearing. Kind Regards, Noah Beals Senior City Planner-Zoning 970 416-2313 Tell us about our service, we want to know! ‐‐ COVID19 Resources For all residents: https://www.fcgov.com/eps/coronavirus For businesses: https://www.fcgov.com/business/ Want to help: https://www.fcgov.com/volunteer/ Application Request IRU9DULDQFHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGH The Zoning Board of Appeals has been granted the authority to approve variancesIURPWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRI $UWLFOHVDQGRIWKH/DQG8VH&RGH7KH=RQLQJ%RDUGRI$SSHDOVVKDOOQRWDXWKRUL]HDQ\XVHLQD]RQLQJGLVWULFW RWKHUWKDQWKRVHXVHVZKLFKDUHVSHFLILFDOO\SHUPLWWHGLQWKH]RQLQJGLVWULFW7KH%RDUGPD\JUDQWYDULDQFHVZKHUHLW ILQGVWKDWWKHPRGLILFDWLRQRIWKHVWDQGDUGwould not be detrimental to the public good$GGLWLRQDOO\WKHYDULDQFH UHTXHVWPXVWPHHWDWOHDVWRQHRIWKHIROORZLQJMXVWLILFDWLRQUHDVRQV E\UHDVRQRIH[FHSWLRQDOSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVRURWKHUH[WUDRUGLQDU\DQGH[FHSWLRQDOVLWXDWLRQVXQLTXHWRWKH SURSHUW\LQFOXGLQJEXWQRWOLPLWHGWRSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVVXFKDVH[FHSWLRQDOQDUURZQHVVVKDOORZQHVVRU WRSRJUDSK\WKHVWULFWDSSOLFDWLRQRIWKHFRGHUHTXLUHPHQWVZRXOGUHVXOWLQXQXVXDODQGH[FHSWLRQDOSUDFWLFDO GLIILFXOWLHVRUXQGXHKDUGVKLSXSRQWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQWRIWKHSURSHUW\SURYLGHGWKDWVXFKGLIILFXOWLHVRU hardshipDUHQRWFDXVHGE\DQDFWRURPLVVLRQRIWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQWLHQRWVHOILPSRVHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOSURPRWHWKHJHQHUDOSXUSRVHRIWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHGequally well or better thanZRXOGDSURSRVDOZKLFKFRPSOLHVZLWKWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOQRWGLYHUJHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGHVWDQGDUGVH[FHSWLQDnominal, inconsequential way ZKHQFRQVLGHUHGLQWKHFRQWH[WRIWKHQHLJKERUKRRG This application is only for a variance to the Land Use Code. Building Code requirements will be determined and reviewed by the Building Department separately. When a building or sign permit is required for any work for which a variance has been granted, the permit must be obtained within 6 months of the date that the variance was granted. +RZHYHUIRUJRRGFDXVHVKRZQE\WKHDSSOLFDQWWKH=RQLQJ%RDUGRI$SSHDOVPD\FRQVLGHUDRQHWLPHPRQWK H[WHQVLRQLIUHDVRQDEOHDQGQHFHVVDU\XQGHUWKHIDFWVDQGFLUFXPVWDQFHVRIWKHFDVH$QH[WHQVLRQUHTXHVWPXVW EHVXEPLWWHGEHIRUHPRQWKVIURPWKHGDWHWKDWWKHYDULDQFHZDVJUDQWHGKDVODSVHG Petitioner or Petitioner’s Representative must be present at the meeting Location/D3RUWH$YH&RXQFLO&KDPEHUV)RUW&ROOLQV&2 Date6HFRQG7KXUVGD\RIWKHPRQWK7LPHDP Variance Address Petitioner’s Name, if not the Owner City )RUW&ROOLQV&2Petitioner’s Relationship to the Owner is Zip Code Petitioner’s Address Owner’s Name Petitioner’s Phone # Code Section(s) Petitioner’s Email Zoning District Additional Representative’s Name Justification(s) Representative’s Address Justification(s) Representative’s Phone # Justification(s) Representative’s Email Reasoning Date ___________________________________ Signature __________________________________________ Updated 02.18.20 If not enough room, additional written information may be submitted 144 2nd Street 80524 2109 Lambic Street, Fort Collins Michael Rossman 970-231-9647 4.4.D.michael.rossman@gmail.com RL Melanee Rossman 2109 Lambic Street, Fort Collins 970-939-4366 melanee.rossman@gmail.com Included additional letter of explanation separately. 7/15/2020 1. Hardship 3. Nominal and inconsequential Additional Justification Zoning Board Members, First, we appreciate your time and consideration of our request. The last time I stood in front of the board back in March, there were some concerns with the house we wanted to build on the property. I appreciate those concerns and have went back to design in order to address them. We designed with the intention of keeping as much of the original structure as possible and to fit the neighborhood. However, in an effort to keep the current structure we encounter a hardship due to being on a corner lot, having a narrow lot, and also less area to build in due to larger setbacks then an inline lot. In order to keep the original structure, and fit the smallest 2 car garage width recommended (20ft wide), we end up going into the south setback by 2ft. My wife and I both have cars, and we want to be able to protect them from the elements and keep them, and ourselves, safe. On the lot currently, there is a garage (built by a previous owner) that was not permitted. It actually sits 2ft. into that side setback as it stands. Even to keep this garage, as is, I would need to get a variance for something we didn’t even build. As the garage sits now there is about 40ft. that is 2ft. into the South setback. We are doing our best to minimize that by reducing that length E to W to about 28 ft. Additionally, I am not sure if it impacts the variance so I will include it, we would be leaving the original structure that is currently there. We will be rearranging the internal layout, changing the roof, and moving the front door to the south, which will require the addition of a concrete pad for entry and overhang. The original structure is currently set back 4.9’ off the North side setback and 4.1’ off the West front setback. The current concrete pad with overhang for entry currently sits directly on the property line. We would be adding a small pad next to that. The original building location does not meet the current setback requirements, but they are original and would be staying where they are. I don’t believe the front setback is an issue due to the fact that it should be considered a contextual setback, since at least 2 to 3 houses in the immediate proximity sit up this far. However, in order for us to keep the original structure, which is ideal for keeping neighborhood context and save us on construction costs, these setbacks would not change. In other words, it would be a hardship for us to move the structure and foundation both for cost and neighborhood context. We also believe that our new design proposal meets the nominal and inconsequential requirement as it relates to the context of the neighborhood. The design is a 1.5 story with the master bedroom built into the trusses, to keep a low profile. The 2 houses directly to the North of our property have similar elevations. One of them was just constructed in the last year. We have been very deliberate to try to keep the addition to the original structure within the setbacks, except for the 28ft section that would encroach the South setback by 2ft. I spoke with the neighbor on that side and he is in favor of my proposal and will provide written documentation or be on the meeting in August. In addition, his property, the next one in line, the one diagonal across Logan, and many others in the neighborhood are built almost right on the property line on the sides. Lastly, the new construction that was just complete at 204 2nd street was granted a variance for their side setback to encroach by a little under a foot. This sets a precedent for allowance of a variance, in the same neighborhood and on the same street. To conclude, we did our absolute best to take the feedback from the last meeting and design something that would keep the original context of the neighborhood but meet the needs of modern day living. We appreciate your consideration. Current Site Survey & SetbacksSouth Side Setback: 3.0 ft.North Side Setback: 4.9 ft.West Front Setback for the Structure: 4.1 ft.West Front Setback for Patio w/Overhang: 0.0 ft. Front (West)Back (East)Logan St. (North)Neighboring Property (South)Garage built by a previous owner currently 3ft. off the property line.Approximate property lineNeighboring property, only approximately 2ft. off property lineNewly constructed addition would end at approximately the same location as current garage that was constructed around 2012 by a previous owner (see appendix for Google street screenshot of garage being built). We didn’t own until Oct. 2018.Current StructuresOriginal structure built in 1930 Proposed SetbacksNew Construction would Encroach by Same as Existing GarageSouth Side Setback: 3.0 ft.Same Because We are Using Original StructureNorth Side Setback: 4.9 ft.Same Because We are Using Original StructureWest Front Setback for the Structure: 4.1 ft.Adding Concrete Pad and Overhang but Wouldn’t Encroach More than Original Structure West Front Setback for Patio w/Overhang: 0.0 ft.Original Structure Staying in Place w/New Floorplan (approx.)New Construction Area (approx.)Existing Garage to be Demoed (approx.)1. Proposed setbacks are essentially exactly the same as what currently exists on the property2. Original structure setbacks would be maintained on North side and West front3. New construction area would not encroach on current RL zoning setback rules for South and Front setbacks.4. New construction area would encroach on South setback by 2 ft., but would not encroach further than existing garage. Examples of Side Setback Encroachments on the Same Street Examples of Houses that Take Up Most of Their Lot, N to S, in the Neighborhood144 2ndStreetDue to narrow lot sizes, there are plenty of examples in the neighborhood of homes take up a majority of their lot North to South. Both front and left setback are outside current zoning standards. Homeowner was granted variance and house is constructed 2 houses down from ours across Logan St. Recent New Construction Granted Variance Proposed ElevationsPeak at 26 ft. Above Grade 2 ft. Less than Current Rule1.5 story construction, consistent with many homes in the neighborhoodStone/brick, wood siding, and standard shingle roof construction consistent with many houses in the neighborhood including house directly to the North.Metal roof accent & vertical siding consistent with newer construction that was granted a variance. Elevations Matching Proposed Style on Same Street Appendix Neighboring property is in line with front of existing structure. 144 2ndStreet000Additional examples of houses in the neighborhood pretty much on their front property line. Where are house sits is contextually in line with others in the neighborhood. Application Request IRU9DULDQFHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGH The Zoning Board of Appeals has been granted the authority to approve variancesIURPWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRI $UWLFOHVDQGRIWKH/DQG8VH&RGH7KH=RQLQJ%RDUGRI$SSHDOVVKDOOQRWDXWKRUL]HDQ\XVHLQD]RQLQJGLVWULFW RWKHUWKDQWKRVHXVHVZKLFKDUHVSHFLILFDOO\SHUPLWWHGLQWKH]RQLQJGLVWULFW7KH%RDUGPD\JUDQWYDULDQFHVZKHUHLW ILQGVWKDWWKHPRGLILFDWLRQRIWKHVWDQGDUGwould not be detrimental to the public good$GGLWLRQDOO\WKHYDULDQFH UHTXHVWPXVWPHHWDWOHDVWRQHRIWKHIROORZLQJMXVWLILFDWLRQUHDVRQV E\UHDVRQRIH[FHSWLRQDOSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVRURWKHUH[WUDRUGLQDU\DQGH[FHSWLRQDOVLWXDWLRQVXQLTXHWRWKH SURSHUW\LQFOXGLQJEXWQRWOLPLWHGWRSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVVXFKDVH[FHSWLRQDOQDUURZQHVVVKDOORZQHVVRU WRSRJUDSK\WKHVWULFWDSSOLFDWLRQRIWKHFRGHUHTXLUHPHQWVZRXOGUHVXOWLQXQXVXDODQGH[FHSWLRQDOSUDFWLFDO GLIILFXOWLHVRUXQGXHKDUGVKLSXSRQWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQWRIWKHSURSHUW\SURYLGHGWKDWVXFKGLIILFXOWLHVRU hardshipDUHQRWFDXVHGE\DQDFWRURPLVVLRQRIWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQWLHQRWVHOILPSRVHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOSURPRWHWKHJHQHUDOSXUSRVHRIWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHGequally well or better thanZRXOGDSURSRVDOZKLFKFRPSOLHVZLWKWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOQRWGLYHUJHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGHVWDQGDUGVH[FHSWLQDnominal, inconsequential way ZKHQFRQVLGHUHGLQWKHFRQWH[WRIWKHQHLJKERUKRRG This application is only for a variance to the Land Use Code. Building Code requirements will be determined and reviewed by the Building Department separately. When a building or sign permit is required for any work for which a variance has been granted, the permit must be obtained within 6 months of the date that the variance was granted. +RZHYHUIRUJRRGFDXVHVKRZQE\WKHDSSOLFDQWWKH=RQLQJ%RDUGRI$SSHDOVPD\FRQVLGHUDRQHWLPHPRQWK H[WHQVLRQLIUHDVRQDEOHDQGQHFHVVDU\XQGHUWKHIDFWVDQGFLUFXPVWDQFHVRIWKHFDVH$QH[WHQVLRQUHTXHVWPXVW EHVXEPLWWHGEHIRUHPRQWKVIURPWKHGDWHWKDWWKHYDULDQFHZDVJUDQWHGKDVODSVHG Petitioner or Petitioner’s Representative must be present at the meeting Location/D3RUWH$YH&RXQFLO&KDPEHUV)RUW&ROOLQV&2 Date6HFRQG7KXUVGD\RIWKHPRQWK7LPHDP Variance Address Petitioner’s Name, if not the Owner City )RUW&ROOLQV&2Petitioner’s Relationship to the Owner is Zip Code Petitioner’s Address Owner’s Name Petitioner’s Phone # Code Section(s) Petitioner’s Email Zoning District Additional Representative’s Name Justification(s) Representative’s Address Justification(s) Representative’s Phone # Justification(s) Representative’s Email Reasoning Date ___________________________________ Signature __________________________________________ If not enough room, additional written information may be submitted 2301 Limousin Ct 80526 2301 Limousin Ct Fort Collins Co 8 Derek Smith 9703015310 3.8.11(C)(1)dcsmith117@gmail.com RL Brittany Smith 2301 Limousin Ct Fort Collins Co 8 3035656533 brittsmit1122@gmail.com 1- We are requesting to build a 6ft fence in front of the face of our property on only the east side of the house. This variance request is based on the reasoning of exceptional physical conditions since the majority of the house’s yard is located on the side of the house. This presents an undue hardship unique to the property and allows only 19 feet of usable space between the house and the rear fence. This causes an exceptional narrowness of the backyard and vastly different than most other properties in the neighborhood Installing a 6 foot privacy fence in front 05/26/20 Derek Smith 1. Hardship 2. Equal to or better than 3. Nominal and inconsequential We are requesting a variance from the fence building code to allow a 6-foot privacy forward of the face of the garage on the east side of the property. It will be a standard 6’ cedar privacy fence that stays out of the safe sight triangle and at least 2’ away from the city sidewalk. (1) Hardship – Imposed by abnormal shallowness of the “back” yard. We are requesting to build a 6ft fence in front of the face of our property on only the east side of the house. This variance request is based on the reasoning of exceptional physical conditions since the majority of the house’s yard is located on the side of the house. This presents an undue hardship unique to the property and allows only 19 feet of usable space between the house and the rear fence. This causes an exceptional narrowness of the backyard and vastly different than most other properties in the neighborhood. Installing a 6 foot privacy fence in front of the face of the house will allow occupants full practical usage of yard and improve the security of the backyard. (2) Equally well or better – Usability, security, and privacy will be improved for the property AND the neighbors on the cul-de-sac. Installing a 6-foot privacy fence in front of the face of the house will allow occupants full practical usage of the yard and improve the security of the backyard. It will also help increase the privacy and security of the neighboring houses on the cul-de-sac by providing a physical barrier between them and the main thoroughfare through the neighborhood. (3) Nominal and inconsequential – The curb appeal and street view of the house will not be affected. It will fit with the design of the rest of the neighborhood. The 6-foot privacy fence will extend in front of the face of the garage on only one side of the house. The part of the house with the better aesthetics will fall within the Land Use Code and the appearance of the house will meet neighborhood expectations. Additionally, there are multiple properties in the neighborhood with curbside aesthetics similar to what we are proposing. Pictures can be found in the PowerPoint presentation. The properties with similar aesthetics have neighboring 6-foot privacy fences in front of the face of the house. Though it is usually two different properties, the property appearance is still similar to that of what we are proposing. City Code Variance for2301 Limousin Ct.05/26/20 Property Address: 2301 Limousin Ct. Fort Collins CO 80526 (The map spelling is wrong for the street) Property Zoning: Low Density Residential District Brown Farm Plat Map Proposed area for backyardXOutlined in blue Proposed Fence lineX6’ Privacy FenceXIncluding the shaded areaXForward of the GarageXOutside “Safe Sight” TriangleXIncrease privacy and security of cul-de-sac Distances and final fence shape dependent upon what Fort Collins city engineers deem safe for driving visibility. Fence DesignX6’ Privacy Fence – CedarXFence will fit required setback of 2’ from sidewalksXFence will maintain sight triangle for stop sign cornerN Est. Safe Sight Triangle Proposed Fence to Fit Safe Triangle Other PropertiesXThe Brown Farm neighborhood (and others)XThere are multiple houses near this house that have 6-foot fences which extend beyond the face of the garageXThey aren’t typically the same property XThe fence in front of the face of the garage is usually that of another’s backyard fenceXBUT… the aesthetics are the sameXThe visuals of our property’s fence with the variance will fit with the rest of the neighborhoodXIt will not stand out as an exception to any rulesXThe following slides will demonstrate these visuals House with fence in front of garage face House with fence in front of garage House with fence in front of garage House with fence in front of garage House with wrap-around fence House with similar wrap-around fence on Hampshire/Cotswold Similar corner to fit safety sight triangle Back of House –Minimal usable space Side-yard space to be fenced in-Much more usable “back” yard-Fence will still fit “Safety Triangle” requirements for the corner-This view of the house contributes very little to the aesthetics of the sidewalk /street view Curbside Aesthetics NOT impacted- This is the view of the house that will NOT be impacted by the construction of the proposed fence- The fence will improve the aesthetics and security of the cul-de-sac by blocking part of the main thoroughfare - We have reached out to our neighbors and they either want the fence as well or don’t care Thank you for your considerationDerek and Brittany Smith2301 Limousin Ct. Fort Collins CO 80526 From:Noah Beals To:Kacee Scheidenhelm; Jennifer Luther Subject:FW: Public Hearing ZBA200027 2301 Limousin Ct. Date:Tuesday, July 7, 2020 5:09:54 PM From: RANDY JAN WICK <JANBRONCOFAN@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 3:47 PM To: Noah Beals <nbeals@fcgov.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Hearing ZBA200027 2301 Limousin Ct. Hello, I am contacting you in regards to the upcoming hearing on July 9, 2020 for the requested variance to the fencing regulations for 2301 Limousin Ct. My husband and I are the property owners of 2336 Hampshire Rd which is located directly east of the location where they want to erect the unlawful fence. We are very much opposed to them running the fence all the way beyond the front of the house and garage. Our house, other homes, and people driving down Hampshire Rd. will have a very unsightly view if they are allowed to bypass the normal rules. We have a fairly small yard and I would imagine it would be alot bigger and more secure and private if we put a 6 foot privacy fence out to the street! They contest that they have a hardship due to the fact that the area directly behind their house is fairly shallow. However, their back porch is on the southeast corner which easily gives them access to both their back and side yard to the east. If they build their fence to meet the standards they would still have a really good sized fenced yard and it would be larger than many if not most of the other yards in the neighborhood. Their request is not warranted. The examples of other homes in the area that they provided is not the same situation at all. They mentioned that they had reached out to neighbors who either liked the idea or didn't care. Well, they haven't reached out to us and we DO care. We definitely do not think it would be good for the neighborhood or that they should be entitled in any way to bypass the fencing standards that were made for a reason. This type of variance is detrimental to the area and it does not meet the requirements for your approval. Thank you, Jan and Randy Wick Application Request IRU9DULDQFHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGH The Zoning Board of Appeals has been granted the authority to approve variancesIURPWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRI $UWLFOHVDQGRIWKH/DQG8VH&RGH7KH=RQLQJ%RDUGRI$SSHDOVVKDOOQRWDXWKRUL]HDQ\XVHLQD]RQLQJGLVWULFW RWKHUWKDQWKRVHXVHVZKLFKDUHVSHFLILFDOO\SHUPLWWHGLQWKH]RQLQJGLVWULFW7KH%RDUGPD\JUDQWYDULDQFHVZKHUHLW ILQGVWKDWWKHPRGLILFDWLRQRIWKHVWDQGDUGwould not be detrimental to the public good$GGLWLRQDOO\WKHYDULDQFH UHTXHVWPXVWPHHWDWOHDVWRQHRIWKHIROORZLQJMXVWLILFDWLRQUHDVRQV E\UHDVRQRIH[FHSWLRQDOSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVRURWKHUH[WUDRUGLQDU\DQGH[FHSWLRQDOVLWXDWLRQVXQLTXHWRWKH SURSHUW\LQFOXGLQJEXWQRWOLPLWHGWRSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVVXFKDVH[FHSWLRQDOQDUURZQHVVVKDOORZQHVVRU WRSRJUDSK\WKHVWULFWDSSOLFDWLRQRIWKHFRGHUHTXLUHPHQWVZRXOGUHVXOWLQXQXVXDODQGH[FHSWLRQDOSUDFWLFDO GLIILFXOWLHVRUXQGXHKDUGVKLSXSRQWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQWRIWKHSURSHUW\SURYLGHGWKDWVXFKGLIILFXOWLHVRU hardshipDUHQRWFDXVHGE\DQDFWRURPLVVLRQRIWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQWLHQRWVHOILPSRVHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOSURPRWHWKHJHQHUDOSXUSRVHRIWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHGequally well or better thanZRXOGDSURSRVDOZKLFKFRPSOLHVZLWKWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOQRWGLYHUJHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGHVWDQGDUGVH[FHSWLQDnominal, inconsequential way ZKHQFRQVLGHUHGLQWKHFRQWH[WRIWKHQHLJKERUKRRG This application is only for a variance to the Land Use Code. Building Code requirements will be determined and reviewed by the Building Department separately. When a building or sign permit is required for any work for which a variance has been granted, the permit must be obtained within 6 months of the date that the variance was granted. +RZHYHUIRUJRRGFDXVHVKRZQE\WKHDSSOLFDQWWKH=RQLQJ%RDUGRI$SSHDOVPD\FRQVLGHUDRQHWLPHPRQWK H[WHQVLRQLIUHDVRQDEOHDQGQHFHVVDU\XQGHUWKHIDFWVDQGFLUFXPVWDQFHVRIWKHFDVH$QH[WHQVLRQUHTXHVWPXVW EHVXEPLWWHGEHIRUHPRQWKVIURPWKHGDWHWKDWWKHYDULDQFHZDVJUDQWHGKDVODSVHG Petitioner or Petitioner’s Representative must be present at the meeting Location/D3RUWH$YH&RXQFLO&KDPEHUV)RUW&ROOLQV&2 Date6HFRQG7KXUVGD\RIWKHPRQWK7LPHDP Variance Address Petitioner’s Name, if not the Owner City )RUW&ROOLQV&2Petitioner’s Relationship to the Owner is Zip Code Petitioner’s Address Owner’s Name Petitioner’s Phone # Code Section(s) Petitioner’s Email Zoning District Additional Representative’s Name Justification(s) Representative’s Address Justification(s) Representative’s Phone # Justification(s) Representative’s Email Reasoning Date ___________________________________ Signature __________________________________________ Updated 02.18.20 If not enough room, additional written information may be submitted 4610 Player Drive Jeff Architect 80525 419 Canyon Ave, Suite 200 Dan and Brianna Brown (970) 224-1191 3.5.2(E)(5)jeff@vfla.com UE (Please see attached letter) July 13, 2020 3. Nominal and inconsequential Additional Justification Additional Justification Strength in design. Strength in partnership. Strength in community. VAUGHT FRYE LARSON ARONSON architects 419 Canyon Ave, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 970.224.1191 108 East Lincolnway Cheyenne, WY 307.635.5710 w w w . v f l a . c o m 07-13-2020 City of Fort Collins Zoning Board of Appeals 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Variance Request for 4610 Player Drive To Whom it May Concern, On behalf of my clients, Dan and Brianna Brown, I am requesting a variance to Land Use Code section 3.5.2(E)(5) regarding the maximum size of a detached accessory building. My clients would like to build an 852 sq ft addition to an existing 768 sq ft detached garage located at 4610 Player Drive. The completed garage would be 1620 sq ft. The maximum allowable floor area for a detached accessory building is 1200 sq ft on lots that are between 20,000 sq ft and 1 acre. The proposed addition will not be detrimental to the public good and will not diverge from the standards except in a nominal and inconsequential way when considered in the context of the neighborhood for the following reasons: The lot at 4610 Player Drive is 0.985 of an acre which is just 1.5% less than 1 acre. The maximum allowable floor area for a detached accessory building on lots that are larger than 1 acre in size is 6% of the total lot area. 6% of the lot area at 4610 Player drive is 2496 sq ft and the proposed completed garage would only be 1620 sq ft which is 35% less than the maximum if this lot were allowed the 6% for detached accessory buildings. Additionally, this property, was 1.11 acres until recently. An area 0.13 acres in size was conveyed to the Department of Highways which shifted the north property line and effectively reducing the lot to 0.98 of an acre. For these reasons we feel the addition garage floor area is nominal and inconsequential. Please review the attached Site Plan on Sheet A1 and the Exterior Elevations on Sheet A2. Thank you for your time in considering our variance request. Sincerely, Jeff Hansen – VFLA, Inc. 419 Canyon, Ave Fort Collins, CO 80521 (970) 224-1191 1( 6: 1( 6: 6(:(5($6(0(1787,/,7< %5,'$/3$7+($6(0(17 ,55,*$7,21($6(0(17%3 3('(675,$1($6(0(17(;,67,1**$5$*(352326('*$5$*($'',7,21(;,67,1*5(6,'(1&(;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;)(1&( 6,'(<$5'6(7%$&.)5217<$5'6(7%$&.6 ,'(<$5 ' 6 (7 %$&. 5($5<$5'6(7%$&.'5,9(:$<3 /$<(5 '5 ,9 ( $5($2)/27&219(<('72'(3$570(172)+,*+:$<6 %3 5($5<$5'6(7%$&.38%/,&5,*+72):$<62,/6(1*,1((56+$//5(9,(:62,/6&21',7,216'85,1*23(1+2/(,163(&7,216758&785$/(1*,1((5729(5,)<62,/&21',7,2160((7$6680('&21',7,216)256758&785$/&$/&8/$7,2169(5,)</2&$7,2162)(;,67,1*87,/,7,(6%()25(352&((',1*:,7+(;&$9$7,216$//*5$',1*$1'&21&3$9,1*6+$//6/23($:$<)5207+(%8,/',1*,76+$//%(7+(5(63216,%,/,7<2)7+(&2175$&725720$,17$,1$'(48$7('5$,1$*(7+528*+2877+(6,7('85,1*7+(352&(662)(;&$9$7,21$1'*5$',1*7+(*5$'(6+$//%(0$,17$,1(',168&+&21',7,217+$7,7,6:(//'5$,1('$7$//7,0(6$'-$&(17675((76$1'3$5.,1*$5($6+$//%(.(37)5((2)08' '(%5,67+(&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/()255(029$/2)08'$1''(%5,6$77+((1'2)($&+'$<7+(&2175$&7256+$//3527(&7(;,67,1*,03529(0(176725(0$,1)520'$0$*('$0$*(',7(066+$//%(5(3/$&('5(3$,5('255(6725('%<&2175$&725$712&267727+(2:1(5,),17+(23,1,212)7+(&2175$&725(;,67,1*,03529(0(176725(0$,1:,//%('$0$*('255(48,5(5(029$/72$&&203/,6+&216758&7,21&2175$&7256+$//,1&/8'(7+(&2672)5(3$,5255(3/$&(0(17,1%$6(%,'$//,03529(0(1762138%/,&3523(57<6+$//&21)250:,7+7+(/2&$/58/(65(*8/$7,216$1'25',1$1&(6*(1(5$/6,7(127(6127(7+,6$5&+,7(&785$/6,7(3/$1,6)25*(1(5$/25,(17$7,21385326(621/<6((&,9,/$1'/$1'6&$3('5$:,1*6%<27+(56)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21&DQ\RQ$YH6XLWH)RUW&ROOLQV&2_(DVW/LQFROQZD\&KH\HQQH:<_ZZZ9)/$FRP'5$:,1*180%(5352-(&7180%(56($/,1$662&,$7,21:,7+6WUHQJWKLQGHVLJQ6WUHQJWKLQSDUWQHUVKLS6WUHQJWKLQFRPPXQLW\9$8*+7)5<(/$5621$521621$5&+,7(&785(,17(5,256,1&7+,6'5$:,1*0$<127%(3+272*5$3+('6&$11('75$&('25&23,(',1$1<0$11(5:,7+2877+(:5,77(13(50,66,212)9)/$&+(&.('%<'5$:1%<&23<5,*+76+((7,668$1&(6'(6&5,37,21'$7(5(9,6,2161R'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH9$8*+7)5<(/$5621$52162170'&127)25&216758&7,21)255()(5(1&(21/<$5&+,7(&785(,17(5,2566758&785$/(1*,1((53030*??%URZQ5HVLGHQFH?5HYLW?%URZQ5HVLGHQFH*DUDJH$GGLWLRQUYW$$5&+,7(&785$/6,7(3/$1%52:1*$5$*($'',7,213/$<(5'5,9()257&2//,16&2=%$68%0,77$/758(1257+352-(&71257+ $5&+,7(&785$/6,7(3/$1 $$$$$$%%&& (;,67,1**$5$*(1(:*$5$*($'',7,21 1(:6725$*([29(5+($''225;29(5+($''225;29(5+($''225('225 *(1(5$/127(6'21276&$/('5$:,1*6),(/'9(5,)<$//',0(16,216127,)<$5&+,7(&7,00(',$7(/<:+(1',6&5(3$1&,(6$5(',6&29(5(',7,67+(5(63216,%,/,7<2)7+(0(&+$1,&$/$1'(/(&75,&$/68%&2175$&7256725(9,(:$//2)7+('5$:,1*6,1&/8',1*$5&+,7(&785$/)25:25.81'(57+(,55(63(&7,9(&2175$&76522)3/$16$1'5()/(&7('&(,/,1*3/$16'(6&5,%(0(&+$1,&$/$1'(/(&75,&$/:25.$6'227+(5'5$:,1*612(;75$6:,//%($//2:(')25:25.6+2:1,1$1<3$572)7+(6('5$:,1*625'(6&5,%(',1$1<3$572)7+(63(&,),&$7,216',0(16,216$5()520)$&(2)678')$&(2)0$6215<25)$&(2)&21&5(7($1'72*5,'/,1(681/(66127('27+(5:,6(:+(5(',0(16,21,6127('&/($5',0(16,21,672),1$/),1,6+9(5,)<:,1'2:/2&$7,216$1'6,=,1*21(;7(5,25(/(9$7,216$1')/2253/$16)5$0('22523(1,1*6)520)$&(2)3(53(1',&8/$5:$//21+,1*(6,'($75220681/(66127('27+(5:,6($7),5(5$7(':$//6:+(5(23(1,1*6$5(*5($7(57+$1648$5(,1&+(625:+(5(727$/$5($2)23(1,1*6(;&(('6648$5(,1&+(6,1648$5()((7:5$37<3( ; *<3%'%(+,1'23(1,1*63(58/'(6,*18(;7(1'*<3%'21:$//67281'(56,'(2)*<3%'&(,/,1*681/(66127('27+(5:,6(3529,'(%/2&.,1*:+(5(5(48,5('3529,'(5$&2867,&%$77,168/$7,21$7,17(5,253$57,7,2166855281',1*$//%$7+52206%('52206$1'/$81'5<522067(67)255$'21$1'0,7,*$7($61(('('&DQ\RQ$YH6XLWH)RUW&ROOLQV&2_(DVW/LQFROQZD\&KH\HQQH:<_ZZZ9)/$FRP'5$:,1*180%(5352-(&7180%(56($/,1$662&,$7,21:,7+6WUHQJWKLQGHVLJQ6WUHQJWKLQSDUWQHUVKLS6WUHQJWKLQFRPPXQLW\9$8*+7)5<(/$5621$521621$5&+,7(&785(,17(5,256,1&7+,6'5$:,1*0$<127%(3+272*5$3+('6&$11('75$&('25&23,(',1$1<0$11(5:,7+2877+(:5,77(13(50,66,212)9)/$&+(&.('%<'5$:1%<&23<5,*+76+((7,668$1&(6'(6&5,37,21'$7(5(9,6,2161R'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH9$8*+7)5<(/$5621$52162170'&127)25&216758&7,21)255()(5(1&(21/<$5&+,7(&785(,17(5,2566758&785$/(1*,1((53030*??%URZQ5HVLGHQFH?5HYLW?%URZQ5HVLGHQFH*DUDJH$GGLWLRQUYW$0$,1)/2253/$1%52:1*$5$*($'',7,213/$<(5'5,9()257&2//,16&2=%$68%0,77$/ 0$,1)/2253/$1352-(&71257+ 0$,1/(9(/ (;,67,1*29(5$//+(,*+7 352326('29(5$//+(,*+70$,1/(9(/ 0$,1/(9(/ 0$,1/(9(/ 352326('29(5$//+(,*+7 (;,67,1*29(5$//+(,*+7&DQ\RQ$YH6XLWH)RUW&ROOLQV&2_(DVW/LQFROQZD\&KH\HQQH:<_ZZZ9)/$FRP'5$:,1*180%(5352-(&7180%(56($/,1$662&,$7,21:,7+6WUHQJWKLQGHVLJQ6WUHQJWKLQSDUWQHUVKLS6WUHQJWKLQFRPPXQLW\9$8*+7)5<(/$5621$521621$5&+,7(&785(,17(5,256,1&7+,6'5$:,1*0$<127%(3+272*5$3+('6&$11('75$&('25&23,(',1$1<0$11(5:,7+2877+(:5,77(13(50,66,212)9)/$&+(&.('%<'5$:1%<&23<5,*+76+((7,668$1&(6'(6&5,37,21'$7(5(9,6,2161R'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH9$8*+7)5<(/$5621$52162170'&127)25&216758&7,21)255()(5(1&(21/<$5&+,7(&785(,17(5,2566758&785$/(1*,1((5$0$0*??%URZQ5HVLGHQFH?5HYLW?%URZQ5HVLGHQFH*DUDJH$GGLWLRQUYW$(;7(5,25(/(9$7,216352326('%52:1*$5$*($'',7,213/$<(5'5,9()257&2//,16&2=%$68%0,77$/ 1257+(/(9$7,21 6287+(/(9$7,21 ($67(/(9$7,21 :(67(/(9$7,211257+($67$(5,$/3(563(&7,9(6287+:(67$(5,$/3(563(&7,9( 0$,1/(9(/ 0$,1/(9(/ 0$,1/(9(/ 0$,1/(9(/ &DQ\RQ$YH6XLWH)RUW&ROOLQV&2_(DVW/LQFROQZD\&KH\HQQH:<_ZZZ9)/$FRP'5$:,1*180%(5352-(&7180%(56($/,1$662&,$7,21:,7+6WUHQJWKLQGHVLJQ6WUHQJWKLQSDUWQHUVKLS6WUHQJWKLQFRPPXQLW\9$8*+7)5<(/$5621$521621$5&+,7(&785(,17(5,256,1&7+,6'5$:,1*0$<127%(3+272*5$3+('6&$11('75$&('25&23,(',1$1<0$11(5:,7+2877+(:5,77(13(50,66,212)9)/$&+(&.('%<'5$:1%<&23<5,*+76+((7,668$1&(6'(6&5,37,21'$7(5(9,6,2161R'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH9$8*+7)5<(/$5621$52162170'&127)25&216758&7,21)255()(5(1&(21/<$5&+,7(&785(,17(5,2566758&785$/(1*,1((53030*??%URZQ5HVLGHQFH?5HYLW?%URZQ5HVLGHQFH*DUDJH$GGLWLRQUYW$(;7(5,25(/(9$7,216(;,67,1*%52:1*$5$*($'',7,213/$<(5'5,9()257&2//,16&2=%$68%0,77$/ 1257+(/(9$7,21 ($67(/(9$7,21 6287+(/(9$7,21 :(67(/(9$7,211257+($67$(5,$/3(563(&7,9(6287+:(67$(5,$/3(563(&7,9(16' - 6" = EXISTING OVERALL HEIGHT ! " ! # " !$ % & ' ' ' # #& ' ! # ! # # ! ' ( #" & ( ) * +, ! ! " !! ! ! " , ! !" ' " ! ' & # $ %& % ' & ( ) " * & -! " # !& # * . ' & ' & & & . " ! + + , # %//0 " # & #1#23/45 '%6 %3%/ 5/788!6 1#2 3/45 02'450 #23/4 9 /*:.*;;; ! "#45<)+ $8 &=8 %&>*9*> ' 9 ? () * "#@8 8 ' ;;> 9#188 () * "#5<8& ' () * "#;- '$& = % 6 .(;(5/5/ &+!%)++ 9 !"#$%# &&'&&&((")*+ -.*+) # & /) / &0&-.-. && &&1-. 2 ) &8 !&8#8 # 788! )90;3*5+ 8 @< 5/788!6#!88 & ? ! 7 &8 8 !&8 8 7 " 45<)+ & ? !88 " 8 & ?)A;B+ 88 !88& ';4B! & 5/B8& ;;B888// !88 & " 45<)+! 4B & ? 88 ;5B & ? 88 & &8" 3B88 8 'C4/ )//+! ; 5/788!6# " !88& 8 8 !&8 & ! !88 " !! !88& ! !88& !&8 ! !! 8 ! & ? 8 8 "&8 5 ! !88 &8 8 ! 8&# ! !88 &8 !88& # &8 8 D 8 ! 5/788!&8 ? ! ! 5/788!68 & & !&8#! !88 " 8 E(6!88! ! & ? 8 &8 ! !8 & " &8 " ! 8 !88! & ? # ! !88 8 Application Request IRU9DULDQFHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGH The Zoning Board of Appeals has been granted the authority to approve variancesIURPWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRI $UWLFOHVDQGRIWKH/DQG8VH&RGH7KH=RQLQJ%RDUGRI$SSHDOVVKDOOQRWDXWKRUL]HDQ\XVHLQD]RQLQJGLVWULFW RWKHUWKDQWKRVHXVHVZKLFKDUHVSHFLILFDOO\SHUPLWWHGLQWKH]RQLQJGLVWULFW7KH%RDUGPD\JUDQWYDULDQFHVZKHUHLW ILQGVWKDWWKHPRGLILFDWLRQRIWKHVWDQGDUGwould not be detrimental to the public good$GGLWLRQDOO\WKHYDULDQFH UHTXHVWPXVWPHHWDWOHDVWRQHRIWKHIROORZLQJMXVWLILFDWLRQUHDVRQV E\UHDVRQRIH[FHSWLRQDOSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVRURWKHUH[WUDRUGLQDU\DQGH[FHSWLRQDOVLWXDWLRQVXQLTXHWRWKH SURSHUW\LQFOXGLQJEXWQRWOLPLWHGWRSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVVXFKDVH[FHSWLRQDOQDUURZQHVVVKDOORZQHVVRU WRSRJUDSK\WKHVWULFWDSSOLFDWLRQRIWKHFRGHUHTXLUHPHQWVZRXOGUHVXOWLQXQXVXDODQGH[FHSWLRQDOSUDFWLFDO GLIILFXOWLHVRUXQGXHKDUGVKLSXSRQWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQWRIWKHSURSHUW\SURYLGHGWKDWVXFKGLIILFXOWLHVRU hardshipDUHQRWFDXVHGE\DQDFWRURPLVVLRQRIWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQWLHQRWVHOILPSRVHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOSURPRWHWKHJHQHUDOSXUSRVHRIWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHGequally well or better thanZRXOGDSURSRVDOZKLFKFRPSOLHVZLWKWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOQRWGLYHUJHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGHVWDQGDUGVH[FHSWLQDnominal, inconsequential way ZKHQFRQVLGHUHGLQWKHFRQWH[WRIWKHQHLJKERUKRRG This application is only for a variance to the Land Use Code. Building Code requirements will be determined and reviewed by the Building Department separately. When a building or sign permit is required for any work for which a variance has been granted, the permit must be obtained within 6 months of the date that the variance was granted. +RZHYHUIRUJRRGFDXVHVKRZQE\WKHDSSOLFDQWWKH=RQLQJ%RDUGRI$SSHDOVPD\FRQVLGHUDRQHWLPHPRQWK H[WHQVLRQLIUHDVRQDEOHDQGQHFHVVDU\XQGHUWKHIDFWVDQGFLUFXPVWDQFHVRIWKHFDVH$QH[WHQVLRQUHTXHVWPXVW EHVXEPLWWHGEHIRUHPRQWKVIURPWKHGDWHWKDWWKHYDULDQFHZDVJUDQWHGKDVODSVHG Petitioner or Petitioner’s Representative must be present at the meeting Location/D3RUWH$YH&RXQFLO&KDPEHUV)RUW&ROOLQV&2 Date6HFRQG7KXUVGD\RIWKHPRQWK7LPHDP Variance Address Petitioner’s Name, if not the Owner City )RUW&ROOLQV&2Petitioner’s Relationship to the Owner is Zip Code Petitioner’s Address Owner’s Name Petitioner’s Phone # Code Section(s) Petitioner’s Email Zoning District Additional Representative’s Name Justification(s) Representative’s Address Justification(s) Representative’s Phone # Justification(s) Representative’s Email Reasoning Date ___________________________________ Signature __________________________________________ Updated 02.18.20 If not enough room, additional written information may be submitted 2720 Nottingham Square Sue Kenney 80526 2720 Nottingham Square Sue Kenney 970-443-0071 Low Density Residential District Tad Bjorlie 1448 Antero Dr 970-663-2868 sales@tnthomeimprovements.com New front patio for better access to entrance of home 06/10/2020 3. Nominal and inconsequential Additional Justification Additional Justification