Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08/15/2018 - Landmark Preservation Commission - Agenda - Regular Meeting
Meg Dunn, Chair Alexandra Wallace, Vice Chair Michael Bello Katie Dorn Kristin Gensmer Per Hogestad Kevin Murray Anne Nelsen Mollie Simpson City Council Chambers City Hall West 300 Laporte Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado Fort Collins is a Certified Local Government (CLG) authorized by the National Park Service and History Colorado based on its compliance with federal and state historic preservation standards. CLG standing requires Fort Collins to maintain a Landmark Preservation Commission composed of members of which a minimum of 40% meet federal standards for professional experience from preservation -related disciplines, including, but not limited to, historic architecture, architectural history, archaeology, and urban planning. For more information, see Article III, Division 19 of the Fort Collins Municipal Code. The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. Video of the meeting will be broadcast at 1:30 p.m. the following day through the Comcast cable system on Channel 14 or 881 (HD). Please visit http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/ for the daily cable schedule. The video will also be available for later viewing on demand here: http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php. Regular Meeting August 15, 2018 5:30 PM • CALL TO ORDER • ROLL CALL • AGENDA REVIEW o Staff Review of Agenda o Consent Agenda Review This Review provides an opportunity for the Commission and citizens to pull items from the Consent Agenda. Anyone may request an item on this calendar be "pulled" off the Consent Agenda and considered separately. ■ Commission -pulled Consent Agenda items will be considered before Discussion Items. ■ Citizen -pulled Consent Agenda items will be considered after Discussion Items. • STAFF REPORTS :� • 1 2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA The Consent Agenda is intended to allow the Commission to spend its time and energy on the important items on a lengthy agenda. Staff recommends approval of the Consent Agenda. Anyone may request an item on this calendar to be "pulled" off the Consent Agenda and considered separately. Agenda items pulled from the Consent Agenda will be considered separately under Pulled Consent Items. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda will be approved by Commission with one vote. The Consent Agenda consists of: • Approval of Minutes • Items of no perceived controversy • Routine administrative actions CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF JUNE 20. 2018 REGULAR MEETING The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the June 20, 2018 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. 233 NORTH LOOMIS AVENUE - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposal to add a rear, 1-story addition to the residence. The property was determined to be individually eligible as a Fort Collins Landmark. APPLICANT: Hannah Long and Tim Rehnstrom, contractors. CONSENT CALENDAR FOLLOW-UP This is an opportunity for Commission members to comment on items adopted or approved on the Consent Calendar. • PULLED FROM CONSENT Any agenda items pulled from the Consent Calendar by a Commission member, or member of the public, will be discussed at this time. • DISCUSSION AGENDA 3. EVANS/REIDHEAD PROPERTY, 707 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council regarding landmark designation for the Evans/Reidhead Property, an excellent example of a Dutch Colonial Revival style home from the early 1920s and home of Jim Reidhead. APPLICANT: Donna Reidhead, Owner 4. TRIMBLE/TAYLOR/DIXON PROPERTY 817 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council regarding landmark designation for the Trimble/Taylor/Dixon Property, an excellent example of a Classic Cottage from 1905. APPLICANT: Shelly Terry, Owner 5. REVIEW OF NOMINATION OF THE PATTERSON HOUSE, 121 NORTH GRANT AVENUE, FOR LISTING TO THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES 6. 7 • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In accordance with Certified Local Government (CLG) regulations, the Mayor and the Landmark Preservation Commission are asked to provide the Colorado Historic Preservation Review Board with comments on nominations to the National Register of Historic Places. At its September 21, 2018 meeting, the Review Board will discuss the nomination of the Patterson House, 121 North Grant Avenue, for listing to the National Register of Historic Places and the Colorado State Register of Historic Properties. APPLICANT: Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Manager 221 EAST MOUNTAIN - FINAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposed four-story, mixed -use development of office, retail and residential uses with a single -level parking structure below grade. The 0.449-acre lot is at 221 East Mountain Avenue on Block 131, lots 1-6, at the former location of the Goodyear Tire Shop. The project fronts both East Mountain Avenue and Mathews Street on the southwest corner of the intersection, and also fronts alleys to the south and west. The approximate square footage total, including the garage, is 90,172 square feet. The project is within the Downtown (D) District. APPLICANT: Bob Hosanna, Neenan Archistruction DOWNTOWN AND TRANSITION AREAS CODE UPDATES AND RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this item is to provide the Landmark Preservation Commission a progress report on two interrelated Land Use Code amendment projects that together address design standards for Downtown and within Neighborhood Conservation Buffer (NCB) transition areas at the interface between Downtown and the Old Town Neighborhoods. Staff is requesting that the Commission provide a recommendation to City Council on the proposed changes. APPLICANT: Cameron Gloss, Planning Manager; Pete Wray, Senior City Planner OTHER BUSINESS • ADJOURNMENT Roll Call & Voting Record Landmark Preservation Commission Date: 8/15/2018 Roll Call Bello Dorn Gensmer Hogestad Murray Nelsen Simpson Wallace Dunn Vote absent ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 8 present 1 & 2 — Consent (Minutes & 223 N Loomis) Gensmer Murray Wallace Hogestad Nelsen Dorn Simpson Bello Dunn Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes absent Yes 8:0 3 - 707 W Mountain Designation Murray Wallace Hogestad Nelsen Dorn Simpson Bello Gensmer Dunn Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes absent Yes recused 7:0 4 - 817 W Mountain Designation Wallace Hogestad Nelsen Dorn Simpson Bello Gensmer Murray Dunn Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes absent Yes Yes recused 7:0 5 - 121 N Grant National Register Hogestad Nelsen Dorn Simpson Bello Gensmer Murray Wallace Dunn Yes Yes Yes Yes absent Yes Yes Yes recused 7:0 6 - 221 E Mountain - Area of Adjacency Nelsen Dorn Simpson Bello Gensmer Murray Wallace Hogestad Dunn Yes absent recused absent Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6:0 6 - 221 E Mountain - Continue to September Dorn Simpson Bello Gensmer Murray Wallace Hogestad Nelsen Dunn absent recused absent Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 5:1 NOTE: Ms Dorn left the meeting at 6:46. LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Sign In Sheet 1,11111iland/or Phone - _ _ "�w .y • i THIS IS A PART OF THE PUBLIC RECORD Please contact Gretchen Schiager at 970-224-6098 or sg chiagerpfcgov.com if you inadvertently end up with it. Thank you! Landmark Preservation Commission Hearing Date: 8/15/18 Document Log (Any written comments or documents received since the agenda packet was published.) CONSENT AGENDA: 1, Draft Minutes for the LPC June 20, 2018 Hearing 2, 233 NORTH LOOMIS AVENUE - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW DISCUSSION AGENDA: 3. EVANS/REIDHEAD PROPERTY, 707 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION • Citizen emails/letters: None 4, TRIMBLE/TAYLOR/DIXON PROPERTY 817 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION • Citizen emails/letters: None 5. REVIEW OF NOMINATION OF THE PATTERSON HOUSE, 121 NORTH GRANT AVENUE, FOR LISTING TO THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES • Citizen emails/letters: None 6. 221 EAST MOUNTAIN - FINAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW • Citizen emails/letters: None • Nichiha Wall Panel diagram & Installation Guide, 2 new perspectives, LPC July 13, 2016 minutes 7. DOWNTOWN AND TRANSITION AREAS CODE UPDATES AND RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL • Citizen emails/letters: None GENERAL CITIZEN EMAILS/LETTERS: None EXHIBITS RECEIVED DURING HEARING: Item # Exhibit # Description: 5 1 121 N Grant Additional Photos and Drawings (rec'd day of hearing) 5 2 121 N Grant Staff Presentation (presented at hearing) 6 1 Material Sample photo CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO The following disclosure statement is submitted to the Clerk of the City of Fort Collins pursuant to the requirements of Article 1V, Section 9 of the City Charter and, to the extent applicable, Section 24A8-109(3)(a), C.R.S. or pursuant to City of Fort Collins Personnel Policy 5.7.2.F. Name: Meg Dunn Title: Landmark Preservation Commission Chair Decision(s) or contract affected (give description of item to be addressed by Council, Board, Service Area Director, etc.): 707 W Mountain Landmark Designation 817 W Mountain Landmark Designation 121 N Grant Nat'l Reg Nomination Brief statement of interest: 1 &m Iq\101vt4 i r\ ok neidk6*rI�onCl e- --� -i-o c re , c44cv. pf,)pe4-i-iu lLOXAL air `�' � vu.+`�or�,o0d , t d- � tt.&-e. Date: 8 Wk &0119 Signature: REMOVAL OF CONF 1 OF INTEREST I affirm that the above -stated conflict of interest no longer exists. Date: Signature: cc (if Councilmember or Board or Commission member): City Attorney and City Manager cc (if City employee): HR Director Updated: March 2014 CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO The following disclosure statement is submitted to the Clerk of the City of Fort Collins pursuant to the requirements of Article IV, Section 9 of the City Charter and, to the extent applicable, Section 24-18-109(3)(a), C.R.S. or pursuant to City of Fort Collins Personnel Policy 5.7.2.F. Name: Mollie Simpson Title: Landmark Preservation Commission Member Decision(s) or contract affected (give description of item to be addressed by Council, Board, Service Area Director, etc.): 221 E. Mountain Conceptual Development Review Brief statement of interest: d�� l,� r�v� w .. Ivy ca N.,pO4 :5 `1 _ ro AA0016 ,. d,c s,-�� �� fiti►y Date: Signature: -- REMOVAL OF CONFLICO OF INTEREST I affirm that the above -stated conflict of interest no longer exists. Date: Signature: cc (if Councilmember or Board or Commission member): City Attorney and City Manager cc (if City employee): HR Director Updated: March 2014 Agenda Item STAFF Gretchen Schiager, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF JUNE 20, 2018 REGULAR MEETING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the June 20, 2018 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS 1. LPC June 20, 2018 Minutes - DRAFT (PDF) Item # 1 Page 1 Packet Pg, 4 1.a Meg Dunn, Chair Alexandra Wallace, Vice Chair Michael Bello Katie Dorn Kristin Gensmer Per Hogestad Kevin Murray Mollie Simpson City Council Chambers City Hall West 300 Laporte Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. Video of the meeting will be broadcast at 1:30 p.m. the following day through the Comcast cable system on Channel 14 or 881 (HD). Please visit http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/ for the daily cable schedule. The video will also be available for later viewing on demand here: http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php. 0 0 N 0 N W z D n u_ O co W H z 11 0 0 H u_ Regular Meeting June 20, 2018 Minutes 0 • CALL TO ORDER c Chair Dunn called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. N 0 N N • ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dunn, Hogestad, Gensmer, Dorn, Bello, Murray a ABSENT: Simpson, Wallace J STAFF: Bzdek, Beals, Yatabe, Schiager m E • AGENDA REVIEW Ms. Bzdek noted that the Walnut Street Infill item was pulled from the agenda and the Sign Code Q Update was added as a discussion item. • STAFF REPORTS None • PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. City of Fort Collin Page 1 June 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 5 1.a • DISCUSSION AGENDA 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 169 2018 REGULAR MEETING. The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the May 16, 2018 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. Mr. Murray moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission approve the Minutes of the May 16, 2018 regular meeting as presented. Ms. Gensmer seconded. The motion passed unanimously. 2. 247 LINDEN — CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is seeking conceptual review comments from the Landmark Preservation Commission for the development of residential lofts at 247-249 Linden Street in the Old Town Historic District. The proposal includes c modifications or replacement of all of the existing doors and windows on the c4 fagade and the second floor of the rear elevation within the existing openings, N as well as new openings and garage doors on the first floor of the rear elevation W on the alley. The project also includes a rooftop addition to create additional square footage for the two residential units associated with the project, and the n removal of a portion of the masonry on the side elevations to install railing for Um the residential patios. y APPLICANT/OWNER: David Kress, RB+B (architect); Tom Moore (owner) W FM Staff Report z Ms. Bzdek presented the staff report. She provided background information about the property and building. She also explained the role of the Commission and reviewed the relevant code. She noted c there are standards for the Old Town Historic boundary. Lastly, she reminded the Commission of the questions they had at the work session and noted the Applicant had provided additional information to address those. um Chair Dunn asked about the name of the subject building. Ms. Bzdek replied it is the Robertson and o Haynes Block which was built in 1882. , Mr. Hogestad disclosed that he worked for RB+B Architecture 25 years ago, and knows the team present at the meeting, but he does not believe that creates a bias for him. Applicant Presentation 00 TOM David Kress addressed the Commission and introduced his team. He stated the project aims to C4 respect, restore, and enhance the building's historical integrity. He stated the project would retain the o ground -floor retail and add two living units on the upper floors; the third floor is a new addition which would be set back from both the front and rear facades. Public Input v a None J Commission Questions and Discussion m E Chair Dunn reviewed the relevant code to ensure the Commission members are all considering the U same information. She asked Mr. Yatabe about any of the documents taking precedence over others. Mr. Yatabe replied that specific instances must be considered should a conflict exist between the Q documents. Chair Dunn asked the Commission if anything should be added or subtracted to the list of character defining features. Mr. Hogestad mentioned scale, mass, bulk, window patterns, materials, and other elements. He discussed the human scale of the building. Mr. Murray discussed the physical characteristics of the building. Mr. Murray asked if the stucco would be removed. Mr. Kress said that was not necessarily the case. Mr. Murray asked if the garage door will remain. Mr. Kress replied that would depend upon on the tenant; however, the idea of including the garage door is a good idea. City of Fort Collins Page 2 June 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 6 1.a Mr. Hogestad asked about the door and window replacement for the storefront. Mr. Kress replied the elements would likely have metal cladding as opposed to painted wood. Tom Moore, building owner, replied the project can be flexible with the window assembly or garage door. Mr. Hogestad opposed using a storefront system. Mr. Hogestad asked about the structural stability of the walls. Mr. Kress replied it seems structurally sound and questioned what occurred at the building next door to cause the need for stabilization. Mr. Hogestad encouraged the placement of the new structure in the interior of the building to avoid injuring the exterior walls. Mr. Hogestad asked what materials will be used for the third -floor addition. Mr. Kress replied it will be a cementous material with a rainscreen system. Mr. Hogestad stated he finds those problematic from a preservation standpoint. Mr. Kress stated they are open to suggestions; however, they would like to do something lighter weight as opposed to masonry. Mr. Hogestad stated a metal panel could make sense. Chair Dunn asked what size panel is being considered. Mr. Kress replied they have yet to work out those details; however, the goal is to not draw attention with an unusual material. Mr. Bello agreed with Mr. Hogestad in terms of metal being appropriate. Ms. Dorn discussed the applicable Secretary of Interior standards and questioned whether original building materials will be removed to accommodate the new level. Mr. Kress replied original materials will not be removed for the upper floor; however, the two alley garage doors are being considered. He stated the roof will be removed to accommodate the addition, and noted the structure under the roof has some shearing taking place. Mr. Hogestad stated the roof is not critical to understanding the building's history. Chair Dunn agreed and noted it is completely invisible from the pedestrian perspective. Mr. Hogestad expressed concern the addition is too close to the face of the building. Mr. Bello disagreed and stated the character of the addition makes it distinct and separate. Chair Dunn read the applicable Secretary of Interior standard which stated the addition should be set back at least one full bay from the primary structure and should be inconspicuous when viewed from surrounding streets. Mr. Kress replied visibility rather than setback should be the concern. Ms. Dorn asked about the creation of the new openings in the rear of the building which would remove materials from the existing building. Mr. Moore replied that is planned. Ms. Dorn asked if the windows on the building fagade are being planned for removal. Mr. Moore replied they would be removed if they cannot be rehabilitated or are not of historic significance. Ms. Dorn asked if the entry door is planned to be replaced. Mr. Kress replied the residential access door does not seem to be significant as it stands. Mr. Hogestad stated some of the door replacement was done in the 1980's to appear historic and stated he would like to leave the garage door, or something similar, as part of the character of the building. Mr. Murray stated the design is going in the right direction and either the storefront or garage door would be considered historic. Mr. Hogestad discussed aspects of the garage door. Ms. Gensmer stated the garage door is appropriate to the building as is a storefront. The garage door could be something that evokes the appropriate character. Ms. Dorn stated a period of significance needs to be established to inform the front restoration and appropriate standards. Mr. Bello stated the garage door makes sense as it was likely present 50 years ago. Chair Dunn stated both the garage door and storefront would be appropriate. She supported an auto -centric feel. Mr. Hogestad suggested the period of significance is the automotive period. Chair Dunn asked about the materials and step back for the penthouse addition. Ms. Gensmer expressed concern that darker colors could overwhelm the historic building. Mr. Murray suggested horizontal patterning and agreed the colors should be lighter to make the addition disappear. City of Fort Collin Page 3 June 20, 2018 0 TMM N O N w z D n u_ O CO w FM n z 11 0 0 Packet Pg. 7 1.a Ms. Dorn agreed lighter colors would fade but also stated it would be interesting to see something different from the original building. She stated she would like to see more setback of the upper level to reduce its visibility from the street. Chair Dunn stated the Secretary of the Interior guidelines recommend using the same forms, materials, color, range, etcetera; however, materials are not mentioned in the rooftop addition section. Mr. Bello stated the third story on this building should be notably different to allow the historic structure to stand out. Mr. Hogestad stated he likes the idea of a lighter color, adding that a tin or metal graphite -colored material could work as well. He stated the windows in the back are contemporary, but proportional to the historic windows. He asked where the mechanical units will be located. Mr. Kress replied that is planned to be addressed in the ceiling space above the retail. Ms. Gensmer stated it is important the side parapet is preserved and clearly differentiated. She stated it is difficult to mitigate the impact of the third story from the Cozzola's side as it is a single -story 00 structure. N Mr. Murray appreciated the nine -foot setback and stated it is difficult to see from the street. N Ms. Dorn stated she is not convinced the third story has been reduced to the maximum extent feasible z and it might be helpful to see other perspectives to get a better sense of the visibility of the addition. D LL Mr. Kress asked if shifting the entire third story back would be viewed positively. Chair Dunn replied it p would be helpful to see renderings of both options. w FM Mr. Hogestad stated it is not just about visibility but about the relationship between the face of the historic building and the addition. He also suggested modulating the face of the addition. Z 2 Chair Dunn stated the application is headed in the right direction in terms of the Commission. 00 ["Secretary's Note: The Commission took a brief recess at this point in the meeting.] o H LL 3. SIGN CODE UPDATE: RESTORATION OF HISTORIC SIGNS DESCRIPTION: � The purpose of this item is to request a recommendation from the N Landmark Preservation Commission to City Council regarding a code change that would revise the process for review of sign permit applications related to historic signs. 00 TOM Staff Report c N Noah Beals, Senior City Planner, discussed the overall goals of the Sign Code update and stated his N presentation will focus on the restoration of historic signs. He discussed the Sign Code and its = regulations for various types of signs. He noted the Sign Code standards do not replace the Secretary of the Interior standards and these regulations apply only to the Downtown area. U Mr. Beals explained the historic signs applications will be reviewed by the CDNS Director and the Chair of the LPC. m Ms. Dorn asked if the term reconstruction could be used in place of the term replica. Mr. Beals replied 1= in the affirmative. Public Input Q None Commission Questions and Discussion Chair Dunn asked who makes the final decision. Mr. Beals replied it will go to City Council. Mr. Murray asked if restoration and replication have been defined. Ms. Bzdek replied the Commission will need to decide if it wants to introduce the word replication versus restoration. Mr. Hogestad noted replication can occur based on photo documentation. Ms. Dorn stated the Secretary of the Interior standards use the term reconstruction for recreation or replication and suggested the City's Sign Code use compatible language. City of Fort Collin Page 4 June 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 8 1.a Mr. Bello asked if there is a limit to the number of signs that can be reconstructed. Mr. Beals replied the Code does not have a limit written in; however, the decision maker could identify those limits. He also noted the regulations state a comparable design counts toward the sign allowance for the overall building; however, if an historic sign is being restored, it does not count toward the sign allowance. Chair Dunn asked if reconstructed historic signs must be in their original location. Mr. Beals replied that could be part of the decision makers' discussion. Ms. Dorn noted location is addressed in the Secretary of the Interior standards as well. Mr. Hogestad asked why the CDNS Director and LPC Chair are the sole decision makers. Mr. Beals replied that is where the staff recommendations begin; however, those individuals can refer a decision to the full Commission. Mr. Hogestad expressed concern with decisions being made by only two individuals and strongly believes the Commission should be involved in all decisions. He stated he would not support the recommendations as presented. Mr. Yatabe noted this does not substitute for a review of a designated landmark building. The Commission and Mr. Beals discussed aspects of the proposed language. Chair Dunn suggested the title of this section should be "sign allowance for restoration of historic signs". Mr. Beals discussed the Butterfly Cafe sign and how this process could streamline that decision. He attempted to clarify the language. He provided various examples of how these regulations would apply. Ms. Dorn discussed the standards for reconstruction per the Secretary of the Interior guidelines. The Commission discussed removing the 20-year period. Chair Dunn suggested just using "period of significance". Chair Dunn stated she would like to see some rewritten language prior to the Commission making a recommendation. She also suggested the creation of a decision flow chart. Ms. Dorn noted she would like to see language changes regarding reconstruction versus conjectural reconstruction, and the removal of the 20-year reference. • OTHER BUSINESS None. • ADJOURNMENT Chair Dunn adjourned the meeting at 8:08 p.m. Minutes prepared by Tara Lehman, Tripoint Data, and respectfully submitted by Gretchen Schiager. Minutes approved by a vote of the Commission on Meg Dunn, Chair City of Fort Collins Page 5 June 20, 2018 0 TMM N 0 N w z D n u_ O co w FM n z 0 0 0 Packet Pg. 9 Agenda Item 2 PROJECT NAME 233 NORTH LOOMIS AVENUE - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW STAFF Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposal to add a rear, 1-story addition to the residence. The property was determined to be individually eligible as a Fort Collins Landmark. APPLICANT: Hannah Long and Tim Rehnstrom, contractors. OWNER: Michael and Jean Martin, owners RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the applicants have complied with all code requirements in Municipal Code Section 14-72. Because they have submitted all required materials, staff recommends approval without conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND: The owners of the property located at 233 North Loomis Avenue, Michael and Jean Martin, are proposing to make major alterations to their property. In accordance with Fort Collins City Code Chapter 14, Landmark Preservation, the property was reviewed on March 1, 2018, and has officially been determined to be individually eligible for Fort Collins Landmark designation under criterion C, Design/Construction. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY: This 1-story single family dwelling was constructed circa 1903. The house is an example of a brick, vernacular early 20th century residence. The is part of the West Side Addition to Fort Collins, a 66-acre area that was platted in 1887. The first occupants of the residence in the city directories were J. Vincil and Ethel Fox. They lived in the residence briefly and throughout the late 1920s, the turnover of tenants and owners continued. More detailed architectural and historical information can be found in the attached Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form. PROPOSED ALTERATION: The applicant is proposing to add a 1-story, rear addition to the residence. The proposed plans, approved by all other departments, are attached. PROCESS: Section 14-72 of the Municipal Code provides the process and requirements for the review of alterations or demolition of structures 50 years of age or older. Commonly referred to as demolition/alteration review, the process begins when the owner submits an application for City approval of the demolition or exterior alteration of the structure. Within fourteen (14) days of the filing of such application, the Director and the Chair of the Commission (or a designated member of the Commission appointed by the chair), determine if the proposed work constitutes a demolition or a minor or major alteration of the exterior. Item # 2 Page 1 Packet Pg. 10 Agenda Item 2 If the work is determined to be a demolition or major alteration, the Director and the Chair refer the matter to either a subcommittee, or to the Commission for a hearing. Prior to the Commission meeting, public notice occurs, and there are submittal requirements that must be fulfilled: a. A Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form prepared by an approved expert in historic preservation; b. Detailed plans and specifications describing and depicting the appearance of the site, structure or object that is the subject of the application, in context, after the proposed alteration or demolition; c. Evidence that all administrative and quasi-judicial approvals necessary to accommodate the proposed demolition or alteration have been obtained; d. A plan of protection acceptable to the Commission showing how the applicant will ensure that no damage will occur to other historic resources on or adjacent to the site. e. Applicable fees FINDINGS: Staff has made the following findings of fact as it relates to this application: • The residence at 233 North Loomis is more than 50 years of age, dating to circa 1903; • The work proposed was determined to be "major," affecting 2 or more aspects of integrity; • The residence at 233 North Loomis was determined to qualify for individual designation as a Fort Collins Landmark, for its architecture; • The applicant has complied with all of the applicable requirements. COMMISSION ACTION: At this demolition/alteration review hearing, the Commission shall approve the application for the addition (with or without conditions) unless such approval is postponed as described below. The LPC may impose conditions of approval requiring the property owner to provide the City with additional information to mitigate the loss caused by the demolition or alteration. Such conditions may include, but need not be limited to: • Comprehensive photographic documentation; • Comprehensive historical, developmental, social and/or architectural documentation of the property and the neighborhood containing the property; and/or • Any other mitigating solution agreed upon by the Commission, the applicant, and any other applicable parties. Alternatively, the Commission may postpone consideration of the application for a period not to exceed forty-five (45) days for additional information needed for its consideration, which information may include the opinion of the staff regarding the benefits to the City of landmark designation of the property. In the event that the Commission has not made a final decision within the forty -five-day period, then the Commission shall be deemed to have approved, without condition, the proposed work. SAMPLE MOTIONS: As directed in Section 14-72 of the Municipal Code, proposed major work to an individually eligible property is reviewed by the Commission at a final hearing. The Commission may approve the application (with or without conditions), or, in the alternative, may postpone consideration of the application for a period not to exceed forty-five days, in order to facilitate the gathering of additional information needed for the full and complete consideration of the request by the Commission, which information may include the opinion of the staff regarding the benefits to the City of landmark or landmark district designation of the property in accordance with Article 11 of this Chapter. SAMPLE MOTION FOR APPROVAL: I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission approve the application for final demolition/alteration review for 233 North Loomis Avenue as presented, finding that the applicant has complied with all code requirements and purpose of Section 14-72 of the Municipal Code. The Commission may alter this motion to include conditions or delay the application for a period not to exceed forty-five days as put forth in Section 14-72 of the Municipal Code. Item # 2 Page 2 Packet Pg. 11 Agenda Item 2 ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map (PDF) 2. Approved Plans (PDF) 3. Contextual Elevations (PDF) 4. Plan of Protection (PDF) 5. Architectural Inventory Form(PDF) 6. Historic Review 2018-03-01 (PDF) 7. Staff Presentation (PDF) Item # 2 Page 3 Packet Pg. 12 N W E s V VA 233 N Loomis Fullana Elementary Cherry St Maple St Laporte Ave _0 E 0 0 J VA SITE U) E 0 U L i� 2.a 1 inch = 200 feP+ CL Cu O u O J d E V M El Packet Pg. 13 2.b Martin Fesidence Addition and Kitchen pemodel GONSTRUCTON 6 DESIGN: ENGINEERING: 5011-5ENGINEER: 5URVEY0R: N3 CONSTRUCTION B DESIGN W Gcs B Mxtlelm. Inc. 501100I0, INC. KING SUR/EYORS 10SOUT4STL ISAVE 41305oAh Gala Ant, SJ 251 '.4506TNAYE.,SUIfENO 650 TGAROENORNE VNELAND GO W521 FMCdIre,CO. 305E GREELYCOWNIA WINOSORCOWW M0515II 0.(MOC252AM 41p5YSe144 4104065011 VICINITY MAP w wy Rolec[Slk O � Iii 4.�wRY~ Z 0 J Q Z 0 J C0 L MEN ADDITION AREA CALCULATIONS LONER LEVEL FIN15HED 1595Q. FT. MAIN LEVEL FINISHED 747 SO. FT. TOTAL FINISHED 1506 so. FIT LODE COMPLIANCE 20151NTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL LODE 2015 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY LODE (N LOCAL AMENDMENT5) 2015 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING LODE 2011 INTERNATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 5NON LOAD -LIVE LOAD:30 P5F/ GROUND 5NON LOAD 30 P5F FROST DEPTH: 30" SHEET INDEX Number Title 1 GE 2 51TA N SITEE PLAN 3 LOWER LEVEL 4 MAIN LEVEL 5 ROOF 6 ELEVATIONS/ SECTION T ELEVATIONS ISELTION B DETAILS N ELECTRICAL 10 NOTfIS15CHIEVULES 11 KITCHE KITCHEWBATH ELEVATIONS 1 w 0 J Q Z w CN C 0 0 J PM N c <a a W BUILDING PERFORMANCE NOTES: O HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS SHALL COMPLY L KITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF REGIONAL AN Q LOCAL CODES, SEE CALCULATIONS, PORCF Q DECKS, FOUNDATION, FIREPLACE ENCL05U AND GARAGE AREAS NOT INCLUDED IN LIVID AREA. ALL EXHAUST FANS ARE TO BE VENT +j DIRECTLY TO EXTERIOR. ALLPENETRATION OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE 5EAI KITH CAULK OR FOAM. R N 0 (V in d O 0 -0' N O ' � N U J � cz p 4�mU 1` 1i C c� L O d N wY mm zo O> Nd. Q 0 K m I z I�6 DATE: 5/2212015 I SHEET: of 1 Packet Pg. 14 2.b w w w z O H w l- J ° Q E z N O o>in O Q d3 Jo CO Ill z ° 0 4mU 180' 5' 160' 15' Q R' LL PROPERTYLINE N89°59'3311E 160.00, Z c T T T FUTURE 51DEY`1ALK u, o YI ------ ------ ------------ SETBACKSLJ 111 µ� Q T T SLOPE GRADE ANV.Y FROM BUILDINX Lu G O V m l 24' � (T F.) p Q K z ~ILL v ry J N _ W IU O F Y Z o O C V C4 rc 8ry1 my J za i wo O W a +y'" a21-bGZ Z -------�tr--�- a 5' SETBACKS ---------- ELL= +/ 12-101/2" cM ---- --------------- - - - - -- ---- -� ----—----—----------- 2- 4' +/-41'-11" - - - 18'-21/2"-----� in 11 589°59'38"W 119.98' PROPERTYLINE C (N) GARAC7E FUTURE 51DENALK to a 102a AT BP Site Plan A n d �o O 3; ^ o� CL DATE: Q r-� 5/2212015 C L v <is SHEET: Q of 1 0 d N w> mm ZN O> Nd. w rc a m f i Packet Pg. 15 2.b V.I.P HEIGHT OF HIGH WINDOWS TO ELIMINATE WINDOW WELL5 T� o12 L � 3m veT C R&5 ----------- SHALLOW WINDOW (OPTIONAL) 1mm w w w z O H Q w J Q z O V.I.F HEIGHT OF HIGH O WINDOW5 TO ELIMINATE 0 --- WINDOW WELLS -- W — — — — ----------------� 0 Q �—EXISTING OPENING z EXISTING BUILDING (NON WORK AREA) LL ® WI I o O ® Q I) ON DEMAND HOT . � O IATERHEATERPOR EW O DDITION (LOLATIO z I .I M . 4w 0 Tm O FOUNDATION/BASEMENT NOTES: I� •VERIFY LOCATIONS FOR FOUNDATION Iw COUNTERFORTS, INTERIOR FOOTING, AND EXTERIOR DECK PIERS WITH STRUCTURAL SHEETS cc • DIMENSIONS TO OPENINGS ARE TO THE FRAMING, ROUGH OPENINGS. ly • INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FRAMED WALL- VERIFYALLWINDOW OPENIN65 WITH WINDOW SCHEDULE W • CONTRACTORSHALLVERIFYALLDIMEN510NS 0 AND 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS ` INCLUDING ROUGH OPENINGS. • CEILING HEIGHT VARIES: 9' IN ADDITION, EXISTING iCL TO REMAIN THE SAME Q r-� oz a' aiv Scale: il4'=1' C O FOUNDATIOWLOWER LEVEL E v m a"1 O Q 0 E j N in d O d3 � N � ' N U J � cz p 4�mU �CA1i 1-4 a d J N WY mm f ZN O> Nd. w rcQ 0 rc m f 'z I�6 DATE: 5/2212015 5JEET: of 1 Packet Pg. 16 2,b w w w z O H w J o Q E z N O in O -10 @1? 33L IlY °h 5511? U) 4il?]V'3V' �1'TY4'3 Q ]b1?'�1b'1i 1?Y4-IO W'3 CO 'Q O W Z O 0 4�mU „ P/G CONDENSER J IL z nwEiERLIOSET F- - c� ^ WALL HEATER a�r< rz tlaa DUI:•,"'.`"" _ _ _ _ _ LOCATIONT.e.D.) H ,uzRs..ix°°' 1 .. siu ELL SET uurvvRr • O w eEoaaDx e PERGOLADE51GN&51 E .B.D. 'A1 """°` _� EKi Tx —__ w --- I'-1a veairvvooaslzEw„� Emnrvsorexlxs UP U) DN Q° V! r i 0 I LOFFEREO CEILING LIRE I h '1 O Te N 9a? �.o 5'I ao uvrte°mec�exiw J OELK YY T ® s0.EEg✓U,' O u°. J ER BD" z a L § -� m rw EX1571NG BUILDING ('' . _ _ _ _ _ _ P ,� - - h (NON WORK AREA) M m ' o VERIADLORA]EYV N , T f — EVE IM60FExIN6 \�� DIREGTVENT TO OUTSIDE a HECK \c FUlI ______________ UP 0 O \� FUTURE SIDEWALK t/! r3 m aim nm a .i'e lrz zslm ra lrr }ate H'I a1 11 IB 1a µ3531? V F A, L Y0 3i MAIN LEVEL ADDITION NOTES: DIMENSIONS TO OPENINGS ARE TO THE FRAMING, ROUGH Q DATE: OPENINGS. INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FINISHED 5/2212015 WALL. }1 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS INCLUDING ROUGH ai OPENINGS. EXISTING CEILING HEIGHT = 9' ADDITION CEILING HEIGHT = 1' 110' ® CENTER OF BEDROOM ALL DOOR5 AND DOORWAY5 ARE TO BE 36X50 WITHIN NEW (� SHEET: ADDITION UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. m 0 Q of 1 O d J N WY mm F ZN o> Nd. W LL' Q K m f i Packet Pg. 17 2.b '�SY�J[JJ�r�4q�IJ� PERGOLA SHOWN FOR (DESIGN 8 SIZE T.B.D.) GUTTERS THROUGH OUT ADDITION /'I PROPOSED ROOF / I \ / / X , \/ , EXTERIOR WALL LINE / PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSSES THROUGH OUT ADDITION CANTILEVERED OVERHANG AT PATIO EXISTING ROOF -----------r \ \ \ \ s \ \ \ O� \F OVERFRAMEAREA / /F/ 0A DI / / /�\Q/ "�j\2(// / / I I NOTES: w w w z O H Q w J Q z O J 2 Lu 0 rL W Q N O O J z M Co N 0 r 0 1, TRUSS DRAWING 15 FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. ALL TRUSSES SHALL BE INSTALLED B BRACED TO MANUFACTURERS DRANINGS 8 5PECIFICATION5. 2. ALL TRUSSES 5HALL CARRY MANUFACTURERS STAMP. 3, ALL TRUSSES WILL NOT BE FIELD ALTERED WITHOUT PRIOR BUILDING DEPT. APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS. 4. ALL TRU55E5 SMALL HAVE DESIGN DETAILS 8 DRAWING5 ON 51TE FOR FRAMING INSPECTION. 5, ALL CONNECTIONS OF RAFTERS, JACK OR HIP TRUSSES TO MAIN GIRDER TO BE PROVIDED BY TRUSS MANUFACTURER. 8. ALL ROOF FRAMING 24' O.G. 1. ALL OVERHANGS MATCH EXISTING OR 12' UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. ATTIC VENTILATION: REQUIRED ABOVE GARAGE. Srele: 1/4'=1' C 0 ROOF PLAN m 0 E j N in d O d3 � N � ' N U J � cz p 4�mU LL C la III a N WY mm F ZN O> Nd. tt Q 0 m f z DATE: 5/2212015 SHEET: of 1 Packet Pg. 18 2.b MATER�CQLOR SIDING KMATEK�LE&EMD LKLA5111S .� J J N WY mm F ZN o> >m W LL' F Q 0 rc m I z Packet Pg. 19 2.b EXI5TING NEW W :4iN5Le T?MATcx.risnxa —�� '> 1 Z PERGOLA SHOWN FOR FUTURE 11 Nr \ LL ^I. 1. IPJAIL91Wti�WLdW Y III 1".I*W PSII 91 If I"Iuf iW^'1i^ YJII pll PJI V"Jll'll"vf IW111111P1 'QIIQI^wllMlllG� 11WIiPYIi: Lu E z KK-w I_ o oQo d3 J � •Lr) O p N ® C0C p L U J W c z p <_ ; 0 4 Co .. :... �. WINDOW WELL J � � p Q LL ,oT Z FL m Gross Section 2 1 Y- kNE5T EXTERIOR ELEVATION W Q U) EXISTING NEW �....�� ,HI"L..O M. mowLet I Z Q . M CNI M LLL115TN50LICK I\%I �Sll�izVn� Ll0 TMom � FL muw ELL L= s 0 a Q WINDOW WELL --� f Q- DATE: Q r-� 5/2212015 m., r E NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION v scale: va•=7• ^ +�+ SHEET: a a ++ 5ECTION5 `/ a Of 1 i; a J N wY mm ZN O> Nd. W LL' F Q rc m f i Packet Pg. 20 EVE] w MI MEMO FM MI If REI -17NCTCH z RMI kM��NW&I O FM BEAR QJ LW r J J ° Q Z ry o in O > O J � •� O MI CO E U J L W �zo ) 0 J LL CIRRI MOO z L � t W Q SNMEE Lo O J MIM Z AMI RMI M N RRM RI MI r O N a wti ^, V Y0 3i =- DATE: MI Q r-� 5/2212015 C M. I� V fis SHEET: r� a+ Q of 1 Beam Pockat =..�*...�. ..�...,. (pant etl =1'1 �....�...,..� __ — _._.. -- wwvaw NEW Ar 5lolnv i 1n'-ra WINpLYi SILL AT 5101XG WNOON HEW ®STONE 11?-1'O 1 rvl m m.�� ��-�� Floor at Fountlation PREFlH. NETR FV6NIX6 iB NEAp TRIM WOR PER PUHS PIAH .�q� a. . • e��e P s.S BsysLso 3vB AMBTRIM WNpOW 51LLPT 5101NG W4IERTABL 111Y=1'tl E 0 O Y J N WY mm F ZN O> 0 rc f i Packet Pg. 21 2.b LEGEND rr oE�L�N�P.NFrR.I CONTROL XO ST�lIDI.W EVNUST Pµ� o U6XiE MO�EMERU'RP4LLL m❑ 9UlXLE SIER LLUIx6FIXNPf XHWHTLLH O ftVSH WNT- EILINGFIXNRf �' 5X�pv�LM,LI�MFl%WREI.xD XELESSEO LI.X I.XO 6' XE4EKEY L�lI PI.IFD PORDIHPIOL�»W EP �&H�POLE #' DIMMER 51iW�E POLE�NYY -��--r T.�AFF�XRE�,�®.XLE VURE%B: »a VETI.XUMOYVPLEx. V X✓� }Xn•0.W�PLFXnXO G/ABWf pSPOE.0 o PLE< R.OYENPNO p� ryl, rry 4w `�' `�• OSIYMSHEXO OURIXES: W.xbE MGO. RfFRIGEW.N0.M'OPG 1NfRPROOF OUM1IX W > n n LU REMOM I LI I b l I I I'I I I I hl II I :I L Z II LO STORI a RDRGGN L _ W N FIRM L-_tom UPSKI wxi Kmlx I' SS��I(!31? 9'i'— [r-93' p�p1��yy / /� \\ ` \ 06) ry \ H Uin O DUPLEXES SCCI DUPLEX °: J , � J i W c Z o p 4mU L___J a LL Z ttt F la L W SN Lo O J DER LET ------- Z JL IN WALL HEATER (LOCATION T.B.D) N `115 _ _ _ x�u _ _ _ "TRY O r UP IT r II ,Tr --- //1 REE:fw,. DECK \ y � Muw ti L------------- _____ ____ ___ xoxv W Lp 0 ® 1 \ II > m LL C______J q LM DECK CL uP Q DATE: r-� 5/2212015 C^, UP E ° ' ' e' '" SHEET: n � ELECTRICAL PLAN `/ a OP 1 ELECTRICAL 0 rc J N WY mm F ZN O> W Q 0 rc m I z Packet Pg. 22 2.b Building Perforwenc HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF REGIONALAND LOCAL CODES. SEE CALCULATIONS, PORCHES, DECKS, FOUNDATION, FIREPLACE ENCLOSURES, AND GARAGE AREAS NOT INCLUDED IN LIVING AREA. ALL EXHAUST FANS ARE TO BE VENTED DIRECTLY TO EXTERIOR. ALL PENETRATIONS OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE SEALED WITH CAULK OR FOAM. ELECTRICAL DATA 8 AUDIO NOTES: BUILDER/CONTRALTOR SHALL DO A WALK-THRU WITH RELEVANT INSTALLERS TO VERIFY THE EXALT LOCATION FOR OUTLETS, LIGHTS, SWITCHES, CABLE, DATA, PHONE, AUDIO, ETC. ELECTRICAL NOTES: 1. BRICK TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADDITION. 2. EXTERIOR FINISH TO BE LAP SIDING OVER INSULATION OVER 1/16 LOX PLYWOODI05B. 3. SOFFIT MATERIAL TO BE SOFFIT VENTED SOFFIT PANELS 4, ROOFING TO BE 50 YEAR ASPHALT OVER ICE 8 WATER SHIELD 3' ABOVE PLATE LINE, 15132 LDX PLYWOOD/05B. - MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLES. FINAL COLOR SELECTION TBD BY CONTRACTOWDE5IGNERI40MEOWNER- COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING ROOF. 5. DEOKINGTO BE TREX COMPOSITE OR WOOD, FINAL MATERIAL AND COLOR BY DESIGNERIOWNER. b. DOWNSPOUTS TO BE COLLECTED AND ROOF RUN OFF TO BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM STRUCTURE PER THE SITE PUN. 1, FINISH GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM STRUCTURE MIN. 112' PER FOOT OF RUN FOR 4' MIN. I:VLlaa IAyIINMII0II4b' Eel0x1 1, TRU55 DRAWING 15 FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. ALL TRUSSES SHALL BE INSTALLED 8 BRACED TO MANUFACTURERS DRAWING5 8 SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL TRUSSES SHALL CARRY MANUFACTURERS STAMP. 3. ALL TRUSSES WILL NOT BE FIELD ALTERED WITHOUT PRIOR BUILDING DEFT. APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS. 4. ALL TRUSSES SHALL HAVE DESIGN DETAILS 8 DR, WING5 ON 51TE FOR FRAMING INSPECTION. 5. ALL CONNECTIONS OF RAFTERS, JACK OR HIP TRUSSES TO MAIN GIRDER TO BE PROVIDED BY TRU55 MANUFACTURER. 6. ALL ROOF FRAMING 24" O.L. 1. ALL OVERHAN6512" UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED, 8, ATTIC VENTILATION: REQUIRED ABOVE GARAGE. L ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES IN BATHROOMS, KITCHENS AND GARAGES SHALL BE G.F.I.OR G.F.O.L PER NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. 2. PROVIDE ONE SMOKE DETECTOR IN EAGH ROOM AND ONE IN EACH HALLWAY ACCESSING BEDROOMS, CONNECT SMOKE DETECTORS TO HOUSE POWER AND INTER- CONNECT 5MOKE DETECTORS THAT, WHEN ANY ONE 15 TRIPPED, THEY WILL SOUND, PROVIDE BATTERY BACKUP FOR ALLUNITS. 3. CIRCUITS SMALL BE VERIFIED WITH BUILOERILONTRACTOR PRIOR TO WIRE INSTALLATION. 4. FINAL 5WITCHE5 FOR TIMERS AND DIMMER5 SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH BUILDERIOONTRACTOR. 5. FIXTURE5 TO BE SELECTED BY DESIGNER OR HOMEOWNER. AUDIO: 1. LOCATE, SPEAKERS AND AUDIO CONTROLS AS INDICATED IN THE PLAN; RUN CIRCUIT OF SPEAKERS WIRING TO AUDIO HOME PANEL SPECIFIED BY FLOOR, 2. AUDIO SPEAKERS TO BE APPROVED BY HOMEOWNER IF APPLICABLE. 3. LOCATE JACKS AS INDICATED IN THE PLAN; IN5TALL DATA/CABLE PANEL SYSTEM TO BE APPROVED BY HOMEOWNER. DOOR SCHEDULE NUMBER LABEL QTY FLOOR SIZE WIDTH HEIGHT IMO DESCRIPTION HEADER THICKNESS CODE MANUFACTURER LOMM 1 001 6068 1 1 6068 UR EX 12- 80' 14"X83' EXT. DOUBLE HINGED-61-A55 PANEL 2X10XI7 2 13W 002 2064 1 0 2064L IN 24" 161 2611X781/" HINGEDDOORP04 2X q,2 13/8" DOS 2668 1 1 2666L 30' 80' 62'X521/2" POCKET -DOOR F04 246X65" 2 13/8" PO4 2668 4 0 2668 RIN 90' bo- 37X821/2" HINGED -DOOR PO4 2*X35' 2 150. mb 1106E 1 1 11068 RIN 22" 80' 24"X52112" HINGED -DOOR PO4 2>(b 2 2) 13/8" DOT 2465 1 1 2465L IN 25" 80• 37X82117 HINGEDGLASSPANEL 2XbX33" 2 13/8" Bob 2668 2 0 2666R 30' 50' 62'X521/2" POCKET -DOOR F04 246X65" 2 13/8" D09 2666 1 0 2666 L IN 30• 800 32'X02112' HINGED -DOOR FOS 2XbX35" 2 18/8" D11 266B 1 0 2668 L IN SO . bo- 37XB2 in" HINGED -DOOR PO4 2X6X35" 2 13/8" 012 266B 2 1 2668 L IN 30• 80• 37XB2 in" HINGED -DOOR PO4 X35" 2 13/8" 013 2260 1 1 2268 L IN 26" 800 28'X82 in" HINGED -DOOR PO4 2XbX31"2 13/8" PIS 3064 2 0 3064L IN 360 16' 3811M81121, HINGED-DOORP04 2X6x41' 18/8" D1T 2660 2 1 2668 R 90 • 80 • 62'XB210" POCKET -DOOR PO4 2KbXb5" 2 1516, D19 3068 1 1 306E R EX 36' 80' 38"X83' EXT. HINGED -DOOR E10 2XbX41" 2 1 3/4" 020 3068 1 1 306E R IN 36 80 38"XB21/2' HINGED-GL455 PANEL 2X6X41" 2 1 3/4" D21 3068 1 1 3068 R EX 36 • 80' 38"x83' EXT. HINGED -DOOR Fol 2 X41" 2 1 wll" D22 156tt 1 1 11 3bbBRIN 42" 80' 44'X52112' SLIDER -DOOR PO4 12nmi" 2 113/e" D23 IW68 1 1 11 306EL EX 136' 80' 38"X83' EXT. HINGED-GLA55 PANEL 2X&XIV 2 13/4" \W W�/ w Z L0 r NQ 1.6 LW r J Q Z 0 J 2 W 0 J a Z 1 rL `W Q WINDOW SCHEDULE �/� NUMBER LABEL QTY FLOOR SIZE WIDTH HEIGHT WO EGRESS DESCRIPTION HEADER CODE MANUFACTURER COMMENTS N WOl W20FX 1 1 2020FX 24" 24" 25"X25" FIXED GLASS -CT 2X6X28" 2 M2 3636FA 1 1 5656FA 42" 42" 45%43" OBSCURE GLA55 2X6X46" 2 W03 W04 2818R5 256OFX 1 1 0 1 2818R5 2660FX 32" So' 20" 12" 33'X21' 31"X-13' RIGHT 5LIDING FIXED GLASS 2X6X33" 2 2 X34" 2 055GURE GLASS O W05 2514FX 2 0 2614FX W" ib" 31"X17' FIXED GLASS 2X6X34" 2 W06 3016FX 1 1 3016FX 36• 18" 37'X19' FIXED GLASS 2X&MO" 2 O W07 2038FX 1 1 2038FX 24" 44. 25•X45" FIXED GLA55 2X6X20" 2 J WOB 4050R5 1 0 405OR5 45" 60" 49"X61" RIGHT 5LIDING 2X8X52" 2 W09 30POL5 1 1 3040LS 3b• 48• 3T'XIT LEFT SLIDING 2 X40" 2 W10 BO50DH 2 1 30500H 36• 60" Bill DOUBLEHUNG 2X5MO" 2 Z W11 1618FX 1 2 1618FX 20" 20" 21'X21" FIXED 61A55 2XbX24" 2 W12 2424FX 1 1 2424FX 25" 28" 29X29" FIXED GLA55 2 X32" 2 N% W13 2B18L5 5 0 2818L5 32" 20" 33"Ne LEFT5LIDING 2 X33..2 M W14 2026FX 1 1 2026Fx 24" 50.- 25•x31" FIXED GLA55 2X6X20" 2 W15 6012FX 1 1 6012FX 12 14" 13%15• FIXED GLA55 2%10X76' 2 N W16 30365C 2 1 M565L 36" 42' 137mb, I SINGLE CASEMENT-HR2X6X40" 2 W17 1505650 1 2 11 IW565C l3b 42' 137MB, 1 SINGLE CASEMENT-HL 2X6X40" 2 W70 11166FX 1 1 11 Illb&FX 112 W4 1783/0" 13W4•X793/8' I IFIXED GLASS 2x6X16514' 2 0 ROOM FIN15H SCHEDULE ROOM NAME AREA INTERIOR 50 F CEILING HEIGHT WALL MATERIAL FLOOR FINISH BATH 59 1045/0• DRYWALL LIMESTONE TILES THINSET MORTAR BACKERSOARD I/4" BEDROOM 110 1045/B• DRYWALL LIGHT - MP PLANK FOAM UNDERLAYMENT CL05ET B 1091IB• DRYWALL LIGHT - MP PLANK FOAM UNDERLAYMENT CLOSET 7 1045/81 DRYWALL LIGHT - MP PLANK FOAM UNDERLAYMENT DECK 11 N/A DECK 97 N/A GRAPHITE SIDING —PAINTED: SW7052-GRAY AREA DECK 118 N/A REDS BRICK —FAINTED : 5W7053-ADAPTIVE SHADE DECK 251 N/A GRAPHITE SIDING —PAINTED: SW7052-GRAY AREA REDS BRICK —PAINTED: SW7053-ADAPTIVE SHADE ENTRY 39 1045/6" DRYWALL SUMMER WHITE GCW4B45WLG FOAM UNDERLAYMENT KITCHEN 605 110112" COLOR - BONE DRYWALL REDS BRICK WHITE TILE --PAINTED: COLOR - BONE MEDIUM - FIR PLANK THINSET MORTAR SACKERBOARD I/4" LINEN 5 1045I0' DRYWALL LIMESTONE TILES THIN5ET MORTAR BALKERAR BOD 114" MASTER CL05ET 64 109115, DRYWALL LIGHT - MP PLANK FOAM UNDERLAYMENT BREEZEWAY 1121 11101Q" DRYWALL MEDIUM- FIR PLANK THINSET MORTAR BACKERBOARD I/4" MASTER BATH 114 1091/0" DRYWALL LIMESTONE TILES THINSET MORTAR BACKERBOARD I/4" MASTER BDRM Sol 1091I0" SW6118-OLARYSAGE 1"ROLKY5PRINGS-123 BARNWOOD FOAM UNDERLAYMENT 5TAIRWELL 62 23311F DRYWALL SUMMER WHITE GCW4B45WLG FOAM UNDERLAYMENT LAUNDRY 33 1045/8• DRYWALL SUMMER WHITE GCW MSI` LG FOAM UNDERLAYMENT CLOSET 11 104510• DRYWALL SUMMER WHITE 60W49451`iL6 FOAM UNDERLAYMENT LINEN 18 lloq1/B' DRYWALL LIMESTONE TILES THINSET MORTAR BACKERBOARO 1W TOTALS: 2044 CO C N d Cz Cz � N 4 N N J cz p 4LmU LL C �� O F Y N wY mm zZN O> w ttF Q 0 K I z r 0 N cc a r � ^, Y0 L 3i ^ i•�L o� DATE: Q 5/2212015 r-� C E L v fis SHEET: r+ Q of 1 Packet Pg. 23 2.b Elevation & CABINET SCHEDULE NUMBER LABEL STY FLOOR NIOTH DEPTH HEIGHT DESCRIPTION COMMENTS 001 83621 1 1 36" 21" 36" BASE CABINET CO2 M214224 1 1 21' 24" 42" WALL CABINET 004 B2121R 1 1 21' 21" 36" BASE CABINET US 821R 1 1 21' 24" 36" BASE CABINET COS 524R 2 1 24" 24" M" BASE CABINET 010 531 1 1 31118" 24" 36" BASE CABINET C11 SF39 1 1 391/4" 24" 36" BASE CABINET FILLER C16 LC833R 1 1 53" 55' 36' CORNER BASE CABINET 021 83628 1 1 36" 24" 25' BASE CABINET Cm 583621 2 1 36" 21" 36" BASE CABINET C29 SM621 1 0 46' 21" 3b" BASE CABINET C31 50851 1 1 3015116" 24" 56" BASE CABINET 038 512R 1 1 12' 24" 36" BA5E CABINET 039 8321 2 1 3" 27" 36" BASE CABINET C40 53615 2 1 36" 15" 36" BASE CABINET C41 OTC902499 1 1 30" 24" 99" UTILITYCABINET 642 U582199 1 1 57112" 21" 99" UTILITYCABINET C43 M62124 1 1 35 112 " 24" 21" MALL CABINET C44 DCM2439R 1 1 24' 24" N" CORNER NAIL CABINET C45 M293913 1 1 29' 13" 39" NALL CABINET 646 N393913 1 1 N114" 13" 39" MALL CABINET 04T MOMS 2 1 30" 13" 39" MALL CABINET FINISHED ENDS 1 SINKBASE Elevation 5 DN 15'COUNTERTOP OVERHANG ENDS w w =z O H Q w z OElevation 4 CJ L L! I I 07ml i awill END PANEL ENDS u E Elevation 2 Lu 0 1 W N 2 O O Elevation 3 J z N FL W O Lm AL CL Q C E v m ram+ Elevation 1 Q o� 0 E Ul in ado � N U J � cz p 4�mU LL (Q O d J N wY mm f ZN O> 0 rc m I z I�6 DATE: 5/2212015 SHEET: of 1 Packet Pg. 24 I K a WA 1 1' .; • � I T 7,y 1.1 i . t. • /� _ .1 - t! Y: ,`•�,�, .�. i�',l _..eve ;( t *J •',jath4�'�'t Ak 64 We t'J !^. /'•/. LL M v- V /.Id _ //ate' '/�",V-,� ,� • a J mot, A 04 t Ilk AW k �{i���ra,,•yyi;plr�l��!./R=+r' f-7°' r7+� v';.. •- CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN, LLC 2.d 102 S. St Louis Ave. • Loveland, CO 80537 970.515.2264 • info@h3-Itd.com Plan for Protection for Historic Properties Project Title: Remodel and rear addition to single family home, build out of a detached garage. Full Property Address: 233 North Loomis Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80524 Form Prepared By: Hannah Long and Tim Rehnstrom 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Description of Project Location: This property is on Loomis Avenue, North of Laporte Avenue and South of Maple Street. The legal description per the Larimer County Assessor, is: BEGINNING AT A POINT 90 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 282; THENCE WEST 180 FEET; THENCE 45 FEET; THENCE EAST 180 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 FEET TO THE POINT OF THE BEGINNING, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. 1.2 General description of work to be performed, including which firm(s) will be doing the work: Construct a poured foundation basement, with a full addition build out above the new basement (1,504 square feet total), at the west end of the home. Construct a new patio area on the South side, and West side of the home. Reconstruct the front porch, due to neglect, to near original state per code with new railing. Includes new construction of the following: •New composition wood front patio replacing, if needed, round columns to match existing. •New windows on addition will match/blend with existing windows in existing home. •New grade level patio on the South side and West side of home with railing and matching columns of the new front patio. •New basement and main floor addition approximately 1,504 square feet. •A detached garage will be built on the West side of the lot to match the new addition with similar columns as the front porch. The garage doors will face the alley on the West side. Fencing will be placed to completely enclose the backyard space. H3 Construction is the general contractor and design firm for this project contractors are: Palmer Logworks Jacob Palmer Loveland, CO Vogel's Plumbing Ryan Vogel Loveland, CO. 970 Roofing Adam Trainor Loveland, CO. Fadness Heating and Air Clint Fadness Loveland, CO. Precision Electric Bryan Johnson Loveland, CO. The sub - www.h3-ltd.com Packet Pg. 27 2.d 1.3 Buildings or portions of designated eligible building within the area of adjacency that will be affected: No other buildings will be impacted. 1.4 Is building adjacent to other buildings or structures, on or off site, if so, how close? There is an adjacent garage on a neighboring property to the south, but the new garage structure is within setbacks. A wood fence separates the 2 structures per construction, and will continue to do so post construction. 1.5 Are any of these buildings or structures 50 years or older (which ones, and what are their dates of construction, if known.) The neighbor's garage to the south is believed to be an original structure on the property. This could date back to the 1900's. We are not disturbing this building. 2.0 Scope of Work Describe the work, and how it will affect any historic buildings (both on subject property and on adjacent properties if applicable.) Provide descriptions on each of the following as applicable: 2.1 Demolition: All deconstruction of the West portion of the home will be done by hand. The back walk out porch area will be demolished entirely. The roof will be pulled off where new construction will be installed to accommodate new addition. The front porch will be removed by hand as needed to stabilize for rebuild of existing porch. 2.2 Site Preparation: Site will be prepared by grading all soil for new detached garage. Site at the back of the home will be dug out for new addition. Staging for the fenced area around the property, including covering adjacent fencing will be installed. Locates on all underground utilities will be completed before work commences. 2.3 Excavation: A mini excavator will be used to dig the new basement. We will use only digging machinery that leaves the least amount of footprint necessary. Excavation for electric lines to the new garage will be completed in this project. 2.4 Utilities: The existing utilities will be used. The electrical wiring will be updated to meet the current code standards. A subpanel will be installed to accommodate the new addition. 2.5 New Foundation: The garage will be a monopour slab, the house addition will be poured on crawl space. These will be completed per the engineer's plans. 2.6 New Construction: The detached garage consists of wood frame construction, with smart side lap siding. The detached garage also has a small covered porch area with a concrete landing for flower pots. There are two pillars coming down from the covered roof area on the East side of the garage. Garage doors will be a standard insulated door that will face the alley on the west side of the garage. 2 Packet Pg. 28 2.d The new addition on the West end of the home will consist of wood frame, and smart side lap siding. Both buildings will be insulated and drywalled. Windows are specified as the Milgard vinyl Tuscany series, to match/blend with the existing. The basement of the new addition will be completed with a bedroom, living room, bathroom and living room. The front door is stainable, and the sliders are the vinyl Milgard Tuscany series to match/blend with existing. There will be a new furnace system to accommodate the addition. The detached garage will continue the theme of the smart side lap siding. Garage will be insulated and finished to drywall. East garage patio will mimic the west patio of the home. 2.7 Parking Lot: N/A 2.8 Driveways/Alleyways: There is no driveway on this property, and we will not be adding a driveway. The access to the home from the alley way will be conducive to having a detached garage. The client will easily be able to pull into their garage and then exit through the east door of the garage into the backyard for access to the home. 2.9 Landscaping: We are completing no landscaping in this construction project. However, we will fill the space between the new south porch and the property fence with rock. 2.10 Drainage: The new addition does not require mitigation for drainage. However, a french drain on the north side of the home will be installed for heavy rain. 2.11 Other: N/A 3.0 Coordination of Project Activities 3.1 Name of person or persons responsible for overseeing the demolition and/or construction activities: Sam Swanberg will be the Onsite Project Manager for the duration of this project. Additionally, Jay Landrigan will serve as Operations Manager for H3 Construction for this project. 3.2 Will they be onsite when that work is occurring? Yes 3.3 If not, how may they be contacted if needed when that work is underway? Sam, the Onsite Project Manager can be reached at 712-540-4768 or at SamQh3-Itd.com. The H3 Construction office can be reached at 970-515-2264. 3.4 What specific coordination practices will be used to coordinate work activities? H3 Construction works with the same sub -contractors on various projects. We having a living schedule that is updated biweekly to ensure good communication with the sub- contractors. All labor and materials will be prescheduled and preordered ahead of time to aide in a continuous work schedule. 3 Packet Pg. 29 2.d 4.0 Deconstruction, Salvaging and Recycling Materials 4.1 Which historic materials will be deconstructed and salvaged? Interior and exterior doors, interior flooring, and kitchen cabinets will be deconstructed and donated and/or used for repurposing. 4.2 Which historic materials will not be salvaged and how will they be disposed of? None of the materials of the built on west porch (addition believed to be completed in the 60's) will be salvaged. All materials will be recycled as possible, or taken to the Larimer County landfill. 5.0 Protection of Existing Historic Property How will you ensure that historic buildings, structures, and surface features will not be damaged during work? What means will be used to protect them? 5.1 Site Conservation: Once back porch area is removed, temporary staging will be put in place to keep existing structure from moving when we complete the addition. Excavation of property will not protrude the 5' border from the property line. Property site drainage will be accomplished without altering the grade at the property line or causing increased drainage to neighboring properties. 5.2 Demolition of Building: The west side enclosed porch area will be removed to make room for the new addition. This was an addition was added on in approximately the `80's and is in poor condition. The excavation will occur adjacent to the existing 1900's home after the back enclosed porch is removed. This will allow for the existing basement to tie into the new basement. Excavation will also occur on the Southwest corner of the lot for a new garage. This garage is within the required set -backs and will be in required set -backs for the alley to the west. 5.3 Foundation Stability: Walls of current basement will be stabilized with extra framing before digging before new addition begins. New addition will be dug with a small back hoe in order to keep the current foundation from shifting. All backfill will be completed using a roller in lieu of mechanical tamping for soil compaction in order to eliminate vibrations that could affect the stability of the existing foundation. 5.4 Structural: All new structural materials for the addition will comply with the construction/engineering plans and be installed in a manner sufficient to preserve the structure of the existing home. 0 Packet Pg. 30 2.d 5.5 New Construction: All new materials for the addition will be installed in a manner to preserve the existing house during the construction process. Ram board or other comparable material will be used to protect the flooring in the existing home. 5.6 Historic Openings and Material: Existing materials to be removed such as interior and exterior doors, will be repurposed as possible if they are in a good enough condition to reuse. 5.7 New Openings: All new openings on the first floor and second floor will be per the construction plans and use energy efficient windows and doors. 5.8 Floor Framing: All existing floor framing on the first floor and the second floor to remain intact as much as possible. We will be removing some framing at the west end of the home to accommodate for the new addition to be tied in, per the engineered plans. The floor framing will be constructed over new crawlspace foundation walls. 5.9 Roof Structure and Roof Framing: The existing roof on the house will stay intact except for the west end of the home where the new addition will tie in. The new roof extension will semi -cover the patio on the south side, and semi -cover the West side patio. Roof over frame will be trussed per the construction plans. Detached garage roof will be trussed and framed to code per the engineered plans. 5.10 Structural Loads: This structure has been carefully engineered by a licensed professional engineer to transfer loads without compromising the existing structure. All structural loads are in compliance with local building codes. The crawlspace foundation will be a poured foundation process with counter forts for added support. Detached Garage will be built to ensure load per the engineered plans. Structural loads will follow code guidelines. 5.11 Supporting and Bracing of Existing Structure; Under -Pinning: The structure has been carefully engineered by a professional engineer to transfer loads without compromising the existing building and to be in compliance with existing building codes. The detached garage has been carefully engineered by a professional engineer to transfer loads without compromising the existing building and to be in compliance with existing building codes. 5 Packet Pg. 31 2.d 5.12 Excavation and Shoring of Existing Structure: There will be additional shoring added to existing structure when we pour the basement foundation. The excavation next to the building will be dug by hand to ensure the stability of the existing structure. The detached garage will be excavated for crawl space. This excavation is around 20ft away from the house structure. Therefore no existing structure will be changed during the excavation process. 5.13 Site Clean Up: H3 Construction is responsible for complete site clean-up of all construction materials at the end of the project. The site will be ready to be graded in the front of the property and landscaped, (not provided by H3.) Gradation around new foundation and porch areas will be completed by H3 per code and per plans. 6.0 Documentation for Record: 6.1 Does the project include measured drawings and /or photographs? Full construction drawings have been prepared for the project including floor and roof plans, exterior elevations, detached garage full drawings, and building sections. Photographs inside and outside of the building have been taken for the purpose of documentation. 6.2 Where will these be stored? The construction drawings have been submitted the building department as part of the permitting process. H3 Construction also retains physical and digital copies of the construction plans. A copy of the construction documents will be stored onsite per plans. 7.0 Archeology How will you address archeological resources if they are likely to be present or if you should unexpectedly find them? It is unlikely that archeological resources would be discovered in the course of this project. However, work would cease if something was uncovered and both the City of Ft. Collins and the Fort Collins Museum would be contacted to advise the H3 team regarding the best next steps. 0 Packet Pg. 32 2.e OAHP1403 Rev. 9/98 COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY Architectural Inventory Form I. IDENTIFICATION Official eligibility determination (OAHP use only) Date Initials Determined Eligible- NR Determined Not Eligible- NR Determined Eligible- SR Determined Not Eligible- SR Need Data Contributes to eligible NR District Noncontributing to eligible NR District 1. Resource number: 5LR.9141 2. Temporary resource number: N/A 3. County: Larimer 4. City: Fort Collins 5. Historic building name: David and Santana Moore House; Oliver House; Allred House 6. Current building name: Martin Residence 7. Building address: 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 8. Owner name and address: Michael and Jean Martin 233 North Loomis Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 II. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 9. P.M. 6th Township 7N Range 69W of % of NE % of SE X of section 11 10. UTM reference Zone 13; m E; m N 11. USGS quad name: Fort Collins, CO Year: 1960; Photorevised 1984 Map scale: X 7.5' 15' 12. Lot(s): Metes and Bounds (Commencing 410 Feet North of the Southeast Corner of Block 282, West Side Addition to Fort Collins, thence North 45 Feet, thence West 180 Feet, thence South 45 Feet, thence East 180 Feet to Beginning) Block: 282 Plat: West Side Addition to Fort Collins Platted: 1887 Parcel Number: 97112-31-013 13. Boundary Description and Justification: The site boundary corresponds to the recorded legal description/parcel limits of Larimer County Parcel No. 97112-31-013, a 45 feet wide by 180 feet deep area in Block 282 of the West Side Addition, as platted in 1887. According to the Larimer County Assessor's property record, the parcel encompasses 7,889 ft2 (0.18 acre). It encompasses the single-family dwelling at 233 North Loomis Avenue as well as the surrounding yards and landscaping. The site boundary encompasses the area associated with its historic residential use. III. ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION 14. Building plan (footprint, shape): Rectangular zo Packet Pg. 33 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 15. Dimensions in feet: Length: 38 ft. x Width: 24 ft. (Main mass of building is 24 ft wide x 38 feet long. The projecting front and rear porches are each 18 feet wide and 7 feet deep). 16. Number of stories: 1.0 17. Primary external wall material(s): Pressed Red Brick 18. Roof configuration: Hipped Roof 19. Primary external roof material: Composition shingles 20. Special features: Porch, chimney, dormers 21. General architectural description: Located on the west side of the 200 block of North Loomis Avenue, this small, single story, brick dwelling is a well-preserved example of a Classic Cottage built in Fort Collins during the first decade of the 20th century. The house has a rectangular plan, measuring 24 feet wide and 38 feet deep, and encompasses 912 ft' of main floor living space. The house is underlain by a stone -walled full (912 ft') basement, of which 228 ft' has been finished. The exposed top of the basement wall exhibits skillful shaping of buff -colored sandstone, likely of local origin (Larimer County sandstone quarries). Similar dressed sandstone is used for window lintels and sills on all but the rear elevation. The walls of the dwelling are finely constructed of unpainted common red brick. The house is embellished with several decorative masonry features not commonly seen on small historic brick houses in Fort Collins: a gracefully curving brick window bay on the south elevation, a circular oculus window on the facade near the main entry, and corbelled brick chimneys that rise from the top of the front and rear slopes of the hip roof, near the ridgeline. The dwelling is covered by a relatively steeply -pitched hip roof clad with modern composition shingles. As noted above, gabled dormers are located on the facade and north elevation. In terms of fenestration, the house is primarily equipped with relatively narrow but tall 1/1 light, double -hung rectangular windows of various sizes, all with finely dressed buff -colored sandstone sills and lintels. One of these windows on the north elevation — probably a bathroom window — now is filled with glass blocks rather than glazed sashes. Other windows on the house, all original, include a large rectangular sash -and transom window on the facade, to the left of the main entry, and the above -mentioned circular oculus window is placed to the right of the main entry. Both of the gabled dormers are equipped with original, small, square fixed or hinged attic windows. Finally, the tops of the basement wall on the north and south elevations are equipped with several small two light sliding windows to provide basement illumination. There are two sizes of basement windows along the north and south elevations, and while all openings appear to be original, the window units have evidently been replaced with modern units. The east -facing facade features a large fish -scale shingle -covered gabled dormer centered directly above an 18 feet wide and 7 feet deep projecting open front porch. A small, original, square attic window is placed beneath the peak of the dormer's gable. The open front porch is elevated above grade and is accessed via a set of three stairs offset to the right/north half of the fa4ade. The porch has a wooden board deck, and the ceiling is clad with painted beadboard. The porch is covered above by a very low-pitched half -hip roof, which is supported by three white -painted turned wood Tuscan -style columns, and two other similar Tuscan columns are installed adjacent to the front wall, at either (north and south) end of the porch. These columns divide the front porch into two equal -sized bays. The right, or north bay contains the main entry, to the right of which is a distinctive feature — a circular fixed oculus window framed by a circle of soldier bricks. The main entry is sealed with an attractive modern glazed and stained oak Packet Pg. 34 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins door. The doorway sits atop a stone sill, and above the front door is a segmental brick arch. To the left of the main entry, in the fa�ade's southernmost bay, is a very large, wood frame, 1/1, double -hung or sash -and -transom window with stone sill and lintel. The dwelling's south elevation is dominated by a projecting gabled dormer of similar design to the gabled dormer on the facade, which extends over a full -height, gracefully curved red brick window bay containing two identical large 1/1 light, double -hung windows with finely dressed sandstone lintels and sills. Similar windows are installed both forward and rearward of this distinctive window bay on the south elevation. It is not known if the extant wood frame, shed -roofed rear porch (or mud room) is original, but Sanborn Fire Insurance maps do verify that in December 1925 and October 1948, a projecting rear porch similar in size to the extant rear porch (which measures 18 feet wide and 7 feet deep) was in existence during those years. The exterior of the enclosed rear porch or mud room is currently covered with modern painted, vertically wood paneling. The back/west end of the attached rear porch or mud room is equipped with two entries: 1) a centrally -located entry door accessed by a simple low set of formed concrete stairs; and 2) another entry with a painted wood panel door is installed at grade near the north end of the back/west side of the rear porch. Small, non -original 1 x 1 sliding sash windows are installed on its three exposed sides. This rear porch retains its original form, but its original fabric, including siding, windows and doors, have been replaced with modern materials. The exterior of this handsome dwelling is in immaculate condition. 22. Architectural style/building type: Classic Cottage 23. Landscaping or special setting features: This historic residence is situated on a lot that is Z elevated considerably above the level of the sidewalk. A concrete path leads from the sidewalk co to the front porch, where a set of formed concrete stairs enables the path to ascend to the I 0 height of the house. The small front yard is not fenced, and is attractively landscaped with a c grass lawn and a deciduous tree. The large back yard is enclosed by a rather intricate stained ~ wood privacy fence. The portion of the fence extending along the rear/west end of the property, E i adjoins the unpaved alley cutting though a portion of Block 282. The fence is equipped with a ,°0 gate of two hinged swinging door sections, to allow access to/from the alley. The back yard is 2!� attractively landscaped with grass, a couple of large deciduous trees, and flagstone paved °� 0 pathways and sitting areas behind the house. > c 24. Associated buildings, features, or objects: The only extant outbuilding on the parcel is a modern, prefabricated garden shed located in the southwestern corner of the parcel, adjacent to the cedar privacy fence that borders the alley cutting through Block 282. Based upon its condition, form, and materials, this prefabricated shed was almost certainly brought in to parcel fully constructed within the last 20 years (since 1998). Q c a� IV. ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY E U �a 25. Date of Construction: Estimate: 1903-1908 Actual: Q Source(s) of information: • Larimer County Assessor's online property record for Parcel No. 97112-31-013 • Fort Collins City Directories, 1902-1908 26. Architect: Unknown Source(s) of information: No information found Packet Pg. 35 Colorado Cultural Resource Survey 2.e Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 27. Builder/Contractor: Unknown Source(s) of information: No information found 28. Original owner: Unknown Source(s) of information: No information found 29. Construction history (include description and dates of major additions, alterations, or demolitions): The Larimer County Assessor's property record provides a seemingly accurate construction date of 1903 for the house at 233 North Loomis Avenue. This conclusion is based in large part upon entries in Fort Collins city directories between 1902 and 1908. An unsuccessful search was conducted for verification of the construction date for 233 North Loomis Street (within Block 282 of the West Side Addition) by examining available newspaper clippings from the Fort Collins Express -Courier including from 1904, 1907 (at the Fort Collins Discovery Museum Local History Archive). These clippings typically present end -of -year lists of property transfers and/or new building permits in Fort Collins, listing addresses, blocks, lots, subdivisions, etc. However, the years 1903,1905, and 1906 were not available for review at the Local History Archive; however, it isn't clear if similar end -of -year summary articles were published for these years. As a fine example of a brick dwelling in Fort Collins from the first decade of the 20`h century, the potential existed for this house to represent a design by the renowned and prolific Fort Collins architect, Montezuma Fuller. However, no entries for Loomis Avenue were listed in Elizabeth A. Bacon's 1979 Independent Study paper for Colorado State University (History 695), titled Montezuma W. Fuller: A History of His Life and Architectural Practice. Bacon's report includes a very useful table (Table 1), presenting data on all known Montezuma Fuller -designed buildings in Fort Collins, listed by street. No building permits were evidently issued for improvements to 233 North Loomis between 1920 and the early 1950s — the time span covered by the Fort Collins Log of Building Permits. The wood frame projecting rear porch may or may not be an original feature of the house; however, the porch's footprint is shown on the 1925 and 1948 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company maps of Fort Collins. As a pre-1925 feature, the rear porch is a historic element, albeit one with rather substantial exterior changes (e.g. wood panel siding, modern small sliding sash windows). Of course, this rear porch is not visible to passers-by along the sidewalk or street. Overall, and with the exception of the exterior siding, windows, and doors on the rear porch, and replacement of some wood sash windows with similar but synthetic (e.g. vinyl) units, the house at 233 Loomis Avenue exhibits remarkable exterior architectural integrity. 30. Original location X Moved Date of move(s): N/A V. HISTORICAL ASSOCIATIONS 31. Original use(s): Residential —Single Family Dwelling 32. Intermediate use(s): None 33. Current use(s): Residential —Single Family Dwelling 34. Site type(s): House 1= ZI Packet Pg. 36 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5111.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 35. Historical background: This small single family dwelling was constructed c. 1903 in the West Side Addition to Fort Collins, a 66 acre area which was platted in 1887 by Franklin Avery. Avery was responsible for designing and drawing a plat of the original Fort Collins townsite in 1873. The dwelling is located on the west side of the 200 block of North Loomis Avenue, The 1887 plat for the West Side Addition revealed that Loomis Avenue was originally called Lincoln Street, but was changed sometime prior to 1902. The highly profitable sugar beet industry established in Colorado in the first few years of the 20th century transformed the economies of numerous railroad towns, and Fort Collins was no exception. In 1903, two years after construction of a massive sugar refinery in the town of Loveland, another beet sugar factory was built on the northeastern outskirts of Fort Collins. The new sugar factory resulted in a major population influx and an unprecedented building boom. During the first decade of the 20th century, Fort Collins' population grew nearly 169%, from 3,053 in 1900, to 8,210 in 1910. Although platted in 1887, the West Side Addition was slow to develop until the sugar industry - driven population influx to Fort Collins. In 1902, the Fort Collins city directory only listed three addresses on North Loomis Street, all on the 100 block, and the following year (1903) the directory revealed only one additional residence on North Loomis Avenue, also in the 100 block. By 1908 — the next city directory edition that included an address index — a boom had clearly occurred, as in that year the 200 block of North Loomis contained 7 residences, three on the east side, and four on the west side. The population boom of c. 1903-1910 created not only in a need for new housing, but also expansion of government facilities such as schools. Among the new schools erected were the Laurel Street School and the Laporte Avenue School, both designed by locally prominent architect Montezuma Fuller, in 1906 and 1907, respectively. The Laporte Avenue Elementary School was built on the southern portion of Block 282 in the West Side Addition, In 1903 a new high school building was opened on the city block bounded by Magnolia, Meldrum, Mulberry, and Sherwood. The former Laporte Avenue School still serves as an educational facility renamed Fullana Learning Center. The first city directory to list occupants of 233 North Loomis Avenue was the 1909-10 edition; they were J. Vincil Fox, a lineman for the Colorado Telephone Company, and his wife Ethel. The Foxes appear have just settled in Fort Collins, since their names are listed in the previous (1908) city directory edition. They were only living in the North Loomis Avenue home briefly, since by 1910-11 J. Vincil and Ethel Fox had moved to another residence at 309 South Whitcomb Street, and 233 North Loomis Avenue was vacant. However, by 1913-14 the home was occupied by Mrs. Mary McCarroll, widow of Samuel McCarroll. She evidently remained at 233 North Loomis for several years, but by 1919 she had either passed away or moved away from Fort Collins, and in her place by someone named P.L. Dennhardt, about whom little information is available. The turnover of tenants or owners continued until the late 1920s. Occupants of 233 North Loomis Avenue in the 1920s included a widow named Ernestine L. Brimble (1922), followed by Charles A. Wildman and his wife Wilma H. Wildman. Charles Wildman worked as a real estate salesman with an office at 214 Walnut Street. By 1927, Charles and Wilma Wildman evidently moved out of Fort Collins, and in that year the occupants of 233 North Loomis Avenue were machinist James S. Finley and his wife Zelda. Packet Pg. 37 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5111.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins By 1929 the Finleys had relocated to another dwelling at 222 Park Street, and the house's new occupants were the Oliver family, consisting of Thomas J. Oliver a laborer for the Colorado Portland Cement Company plant, his wife Jessie, and another family member named Eleanor Oliver. Mr. Oliver apparently retired by 1931, and the Olivers remained in the home until sometime in the 1940s (prior to 1948). After World War II, in 1948, Thomas and Jessie Oliver had evidently moved away from Fort Collins, but Eleanor Oliver had settled into another home located at 639 South Loomis Avenue. From c. 1948 (possibly earlier in the 1940s) through c. 1955, the brick house at 233 North Loomis Avenue was home to Dorsey C. and Rose E. Allred. Dorsey had various jobs while living at the North Loomis Avenue residence. In 1948, for example, Dorsey Allred was listed as a "blade operator;" in 1950, he was an employee of the Monahan Construction Company. In 1952 Dorsey was reportedly working as an operating engineer for Winston Brothers, and in 1954 he was a driver working for Bussard Bus Lines. While living at the house, at least one child was living at 233 North Loomis: June Allred, who in the 1952 Fort Collins City Directory is listed as a high school student. Around 1955, Dorsey and Rose Allred moved to another dwelling located at 631 Laporte Avenue, and as of 1956, Mae M. Sinnard, an unemployed single woman, possibly a widow, lived alone at 233 North Loomis Avenue, but by 1957, she had moved to 815 West Magnolia Street, and in her place were new owners David and Santana Moore, who purchased the house in October of 1956. David Moore was then employed as a foreman for the Ideal Cement Company as a "mill foreman" and as "supervisor of the Ideal Cement pit." Moore continued to work for the cement company for nearly 10 more years; in 1966 he was listed in the city directory as a "city employee." David and Santana Moore had 6 children: David, born 1949; twins Patrick and Michael, both born in 1950; Joan, born in 1952; John, born in 1957; and Gail, born in 1963. Another daughter, Susan, was born in 1968. The Moore family lived at 233 North Loomis Avenue from October 1956 until c. 2005 — a time span of approximately 50 years. By 1966 David Moore had become a City of Fort Collins employee although his exact position was not disclosed with the sole exception of the 1986 Fort Collins City Directory, in which David Moore's occupation is listed as "Water Supervisor City of Ft. Collins." At some point, by 1981, Santana Moore was employed by the Poudre R1 School District in an unspecified capacity. Daughter Susan Moore attended CSU and was living at home while doing so in 1988, and as of 1990, Santana Moore was employed as a "historic outreach coordinator" for Poudre R1 School District. David Moore retired in 1987. While not verified, city directory data suggest that David Moore had passed away sometime around 2002-2004. The home appears to have possibly been uninhabited in 2006-2007 and in late October of 2007 had been acquired and occupied by Jack Leonard Mullen and Elizabeth Leigh Tropman. Mr. Mullen owned and occupied the property until November 2017, after its sale to the current owners, Michael and Jean Martin, who relocated to Fort Collins from northern California. An application by the Martins to enlarge the dwelling by constructing a 900 ft2, single story rear addition in 2018 triggered the need for this documentation and evaluation of this historic home. Because it is more than 50 years old, the City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Department required this documentation to be completed in order to assess the property's historical and architectural significance per the City's historic preservation ordinance. In March of 2018, Packet Pg. 38 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins historic preservation consulting company Retrospect was hired on behalf of the property owner (Michael and Jean Martin) by Loveland -based architectural firm H3 to research and document the property onto this Colorado Architectural Inventory Form. 36. Sources of information: Bacon, Elizabeth A. 1979 Montezuma W. Fuller: A History of His Life and Architectural Practice. Colorado State University History 695: Independent Study Paper, July 9, 1979, Beier, Harold 1958 Fort Collins, History and General Character. Research and Survey Report, Part 1. Prepared by Harold Beier, Community Development Consultant, Fort Collins, Colorado, for the City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Board, April 1958. City of Fort Collins Log of Building Permits, 1920 — c. early 1950s, in collection of the Fort Collins Discovery Museum Local History Archive. Fort Collins City Directories, for the years 1902 through 2017 (with gaps). From the collection of the Fort Collins Discovery Museum Local History Archive. Larimer County Assessor 1948 Property Card for 233 Loomis Avenue (Parcel No. 97112-31-013). From the collection of the Fort Collins Discovery Museum Local History Archive. 1968 Property Card for 233 Loomis Avenue (Parcel No. 97112-31-013). From the collection of the Fort Collins Discovery Museum Local History Archive, 1979 Property Card for 233 Loomis Avenue (Parcel No. 97112-31-013). From the collection E of the Fort Collins Discovery Museum Local History Archive. ,°0 2018 Property information record for 233 North Loomis Avenue (Parcel No. 97112-31-013). ° 0 c Larimer County Assessor's website, accessed online, May 31, 2018. > c McWilliams, Carl 2000 City of Fort Collins Architectural Inventory Form, Westside Neighborhood Survey Project, for 233 North Loomis Avenue (5LR.9141). Prepared by Carl McWilliams, November 6, 2000. On file at City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Department. U Q Simmons, Thomas, and Laurie Simmons. 1992 City of Fort Collins Central Business District Development and Residential Architecture E Historic Contexts. Report prepared by Front Range Research Associates for the City of Fort Collins Advance Planning Department. Q VI. SIGNIFICANCE 37. Local landmark designation: Yes Designating authority: Not Applicable No X Date of designation: Not Applicable Packet Pg. 39 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 38. Applicable National Register Criteria: A. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history; B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. Qualifies under Criteria Considerations A through G (see Manual) X Does not meet any of the above National Register criteria 39. Area(s) of significance: Agriculture, Community Development, Architecture 40. Period of significance: C. 1902-1910 41. Level of significance: National State Local X_ 42. Statement of significance: Fort Collins Local Landmark -eligibility: The David and Santana Moore House (5LR.9141) is significant under Criterion A for its association with the unprecedented building boom in Fort Collins during the first decade of the 20th Century —a very significant trend in Fort Collins history when the town grew rapidly and the economy was greatly boosted by the advent of sugar beet agriculture and the beet sugar refining industry in eastern Colorado. The house was built c. 1903-1908, during a decade when the City's population grew nearly 169%. Like many modest sized houses from the very early years of the 20th century, the house at 233 North Loomis Avenue experienced considerable turnover of short term occupancies. A title search was not conducted so the distinction between owners and tenants isn't always clear or discernable without further archival research. Nevertheless, city directory data reveal that the handsome but very small (912 ft') home was occupied throughout its existence by people sustained by income from a variety of skilled and relatively unskilled jobs, including a telephone lineman, real estate agent (?), machinist, concrete plant laborer, bus driver, and City of Fort Collins water department worker. As often is the case, 233 North Loomis Avenue was also occupied for brief periods of time by widows and retired couples. The longest -term owners/occupants of 233 North Loomis Avenue were David and Santana Moore, a typical "working class" couple in early -mid twentieth century Fort Collins history. Archival research verified that the residential property at 233 North Loomis Avenue is not directly associated with any people (architects, owners, or occupants) who were known (through archival research) to have contributed significantly or had a major influence with respect to the history of Fort Collins, Larimer County, the State of Colorado, or the United States. Therefore; it cannot qualify for Local Landmark designation under Criterion B. Nevertheless, this modest -sized example of Classic Cottage domestic architecture is recommended as qualifying for Local Landmark designation under Criterion C, as a well- preserved, distinctive, and finely constructed brick example of this early 20th century architectural style. The building exhibits common features of the style, including a steeply pitched hip roof, a gabled dormer on the fa4ade decoratively clad with patterned/fish scale Packet Pg. 40 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins shingles, and a projecting open front porch supported by lathe turned tapered Tuscan posts. It is a very skillfully constructed house in terms of the quality of the brick masonry (including the large curved north side window bay, and the oculus window on the facade), as well as the fine quality of the stone masonry employed. The stone work demonstrates great care in the selection and trimming of architectural elements such as the basement wall, and the numerous window and door lintels and sills. For these reasons, the David and Santana Moore House at 233 North Loomis Avenue qualifies as eligible for designation as a Fort Collins Local Landmark, Note: In November of 2000, Carl McWilliams, on behalf of the City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Department, surveyed 233 North Loomis Avenue during an ambitious reconnaissance -level inventory of both the vast Eastside and Westside Neighborhood Areas (divided east and west by College Avenue, extending from Cherry Street on the north to Prospect Avenue on the south). A photograph on the survey form taken of 233 North Loomis Avenue facing west-northwest reveals only one possible and relatively minor change with respect to the present appearance of the dwelling's facade: in 2000 the home's front porch was accessed by stairs constructed of wood or sandstone, with a simple wooden handrail on one side. Sometime after 2000, the porch stairs were replaced with similar dimension formed concrete stairs. After his review, McWilliams assessed the property as individually eligible for designation as a Local Landmark, as well as a contributing element of a potential historic district encompassing the Westside Neighborhood. Such a historic district can potentially meet the eligibility criteria of both the City of Fort Collins' Local Landmark program as well as those of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). 43. Assessment of historic physical integrity related to significance: The David and Santana Moore N House is little altered, and retains substantial integrity of location, design, materials, I 0 craftmanship, setting, feeling and association. The only noteworthy modifications are c replacement of historic rear porch siding and windows, and replacement of basement windows. ~ Otherwise the house's exterior appears essentially unaltered. The dwelling's integrity is clearly E LM sufficient to meet the integrity requirements of both the National Register of Historic Places Um and the City of Fort Collins Local Landmark program. 2!� 0 c VII. NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT > c 44. National Register individual eligibility field assessment: g� (individual) g Y � Eligible Not (Individually) Eligible X Need Data 45. Is there National Register district potential? Yes X No Discuss: Z If there is National Register district potential, is this building: Q Contributing X Noncontributing _ } 46. If the building is in existing National Register district, is it: W Contributing _ Noncontributing _ Not Applicable X E U M Vill. CITY OF FORT COLLINS LOCAL LANDMARK ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT Q 47. Local Landmark (individual) eligibility field assessment: Eligible X Not (Individually) Eligible Need Data IX. RECORDING INFORMATION Packet Pg. 41 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-11.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 48. Photograph numbers: 5LR.9141 #1-26 Negatives or digital photo files filed at: City of Fort Collins, Development Review Center (Current Planning) - Historic Preservation Department, 281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80524 49. Report title CO Historic and Architectural Assessment for 233 North Loomis Street, Fort Collins, 50. Date(s): June 8, 2018 51. Recorder(s): Jason Marmor 52. Organization: RETROSPECT 53. Address: 1031 East 4th Street, Unit B. Loveland, CO 80537 54. Phone number(s): (970) 219-9155 History Colorado - Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation 1200 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203 (303) 866-3395 Packet Pg. 42 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-11.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 233 North Loomis Avenue - - - j —.•l 5LR.9141 I 1: 07 ucki am �[.r�'.�•. .aka •yr r :7a Y-. .. tC{<+ •,�++•i, ii- 'i + s�; �» t ;• �� A .K `'' S' �'� �' ' :`Park ' . i•r Is •�Y.� ♦Ii. irk f /•f N R•'� • I It 1 -j �M. .S eH S. rcc y t3.. ',•: ~ ` ✓> �'7• 4'. � Y � r.1.-...,-. '! .< � a. �I �`L i 1 ♦, ♦5 \j . �!. .�< .rye � •+- s y�. ,♦ ♦r✓e,lt. y _ •l. %�' SA } a•••G �!> Y�Jy'`. +j'w} f ./Y /^li�w � -� 1.�<• �,1 YSM ','•� �" �:,F i.• ^�,.; �a+\ •� 1 ji - ff CIS )jii. `>' J '•a J .•. } + t•` er ,. _.1 , •,; M �� a •a r '•w +. rd •'. 1 .. .= . ^ r �'��'. •� � aJ lr 'O ♦� - . - '< �. < Yo•w�' ' S .: s�,.,��MM vn fit`•:.. ..�A ... -. .; C_ ~~aim%- '° �•?S -fS � .+: i' w ! .. .� }I n �.'. T a ,- .ice �y(� • +�.,. `�y'�.�r�'• I.� .i �v ram' .>. N re � r= cl.r-. .F-a �i � w•�f�` NY. •"rr ...' .. y • •` .. � •• wyw/G� '''1'1 �•JyW? , • " r < •,j. !• . `vim{'.. Clwi r }..a Z � ♦. � ✓�\� _ w S:' .+ • � �. - {Ar 7 t .+1 ..-- .'^.? - .r ... • .a ..v. •i � 'r-•-e�. •.I •' .i 1.•iis r>•. •'S � � ~ t i♦ > �*. i HK K' • _ I� •III � _� 7 .. .� ��� . e �. „r. r .. a♦ >S � ♦5 �.+ r.,i'✓'4 ••a. > }♦ _. i In z i4RADQ fST + ... 7 TNI4 4 lie - <T • Is • - •• M., r l • 'yam• +, �fl�1 ",J '.J ..� r ' �.. '} G "-,.y x•,•'.S� ^ 4 _`�F r ✓Y'- T-�— .. �..., ^, r _•'�^ ,tom d >. • • _ i �A _ _•7 01 • w w I•. �.!. 1 kmir is- -... rr. �' N^ _.• 1 it N , It..•� - :''0 ;'.. Location of 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins (51-R.9141), shown on a portion of the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5' Fort Collins, Colorado topographic quadrangle map (1960; Photorevised 1984). W W Z O NH W H J Q Z O O W J Z LL I W CO G O Z M M N 11 o_ tic L O u_ O d M m U a rM >_ M M a Packet Pg. 43 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-11.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 45 feet Alley 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Modern storage shed 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (oil 1 1 Large deciduous tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 �/ �/� 1 1 Enclosed rear porch 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NORTH LOOMIS AVENUE Sketch map of 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins (51.R.9141). w J Q z TY 2 0 z M M N O TMM ti v r� Packet Pg. 44 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-11.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins V c NO,* nr[ to to -1 T STREET. I 1 I j I i la� At N STREET. Arl.4, er root WZST SIDE .A;DDITiiox PO Tl1E Ci'1'T Of 2'0XT COLLINS M! L ""AtoRL STREET. JJ —�I aL It FL $tale-U01'c equal Ji,>ck. ' , ' • - 1 if tN[RNY STREET. �iicFfjtfio�r. cr r.! and .�!�.;� ,! ,7��� 11✓lyx q� °5 RS-tie*,AAA ]Ir,,,-C�'v✓,L.auenT - ;IJw y. c- ri - I - 1 � S..�1.jj�r Q.w.✓ .. L R 'N. L _ n L-sw- 1A&0/L)..ry, •'y OPJJO-I 1� MAPLE to Lt ., j �I•� �� ry �._ 1 — � 1�i � I 1 V1Tr-l__-T 1-7-1' I'i'T;'�f"h .• 4-1 .41e'I � �Tl. i J11 J�1"== II 1887 Plat of the West Side Addition to Fort Collins. Source: Larimer County Recorder. Red arrow points to location of 233 North Loomis Avenue. W W W z 0 W J Q z 0 2 W z Um 1 W Q co 0 0 z M M N Q tic L 0 Um 0 M m U a 1= E M er a L y Packet Pg. 45 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins — a MAPLE ti O D Iv l .I I, f ,i �i Ti � Z 9y tI (' ♦-. � f r. 40, oil / Ilt WL ID .� D No I r....rk _ _.. _.r L le to, 11 �I ��•- i�i IJ •. i. �., s >q It ''A Fort „ ... "_ L'4�OR•7rE. i _ _ _ _AV.- __..,to 14 _ __....15 Portion of December 1925 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company map of Fort Collins, showing the property at 233 North Loomis Avenue. Packet Pg, 46 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins J &I fly r, L � -... . _. .�— za --- ,ter' ar• Q I _ h J MAPLE 'EA r 1 L �, �. � r � I I (�, I l I l'.n_•�" .......�AiC.....IYYa.:Y1 14 ~` 3 = 1 Z38VhfC's en 0 _ lor— i LL Scale of fee, lot .. _. TRQdCO![ll�.._ _A Portion of October 1948 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company map of Fort Collins, showing the property at 233 North Loomis Avenue. A Packet Pg. 47 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5111.9141- 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins y 1948 View of 233 North Loomis Avenue, from old Larimer County Assessor's property card. On file at the Local History Archive, Fort Collins Discovery Museum. 1968 View of 233 North Loomis Avenue, from old Larimer County Assessor's property card. On file at the Local History Archive, Fort Collins Discovery Museum. El Packet Pg. 48 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-11.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 1979 View of 233 North Loomis Avenue, from old Larimer County Assessor's property card. On file at the Local History Archive, Fort Collins Discovery Museum. L O Um O i i Packet Pg. 49 71 �r "�.�., S n 19 Al Wl ► 11 u `Y{e d.•rtS 'Ys T - �• • 4 at ti� O t ^e 1 fir. i , . '� 1 �� 1r • 1. µ _ t:- �l i 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5111.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 233 North Loomis Avenue (51-R.9141), oculus window on fagade, looking northwest. 'y ! -_ ` R \ i r 233 North Loomis Avenue (51-R.9141), oculus window on fagade, looking west. Packet Pg. 54 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 233 North Loomis Avenue (51-R.9141), main entry equipped with non -original door, looking west-southwest. W LU W Z O i= Q W J Q Z O H J 2 W J Z LL W Q CO O O J Z M M N O O ti cv i L O LL O a m M m U a rM E M Q Packet Pg. 55 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-11.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 233 North Loomis Avenue (51-R.9141), curving brick window bay on south elevation, view looking northwest. Packet Pg. 56 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-11.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 233 North Loomis Avenue (5LR.9141),south elevation, looking northwest. 233 North Loomis Avenue (51-R.9141), basement window on south elevation. Packet Pg. 57 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 233 North Loomis Avenue (51-R.9141), typical double -hung window with dressed sandstone lintel and sill; this example is on the dwelling's south elevation. View looking northwest. El Packet Pg. 58 a w 4"A Jam!) I - - -- e I i 4 T ^, c will" 11 Lit i i y . y: ;AN �cn'fr, s -:,er a s 3�J A lit Y.3 No Text 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 233 North Loomis Avenue (51-R.9141), rear portion of north elevation, looking west. 233 North Loomis Avenue (51-R.9141), rear view, looking east-northeast, showing enclosed rear porch. Packet Pg. 63 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-11.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins J • 4k#F,.� r % L*�•.`�� dk f� iw 4h AM fu 4 11 ��• �04 �r 7,S R� Ow 233 North Loomis Avenue (51-R.9141), corbelled chimney on front slope of roof. W W z O i= Q Lw r J z O J O w 0 J z_ LL LU CO O 0 z M M N 11 O �c_ i L O LL O i L V L a E M a Packet Pg. 64 lim NYiSIV:�4 ,f'. p l �l •iyS 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-11.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins APPENDIX: HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER OF THE 200 BLOCK OF NORTH LOOMIS AVENUE IN FORT COLLINS, COLORADO Packet Pg. 66 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins In order to assess the potential impact(s) to the historic Westside Neighborhood area, a review was completed of the architectural character of the 200 Block of North Loomis Avenue in Fort Collins. Information was collected by a field visit as well as from the Larimer County Assessor's online property records and Geographic Information System (GIS) viewer. Table 1, below, lists the residential properties along the 200 block of North Loomis Avenue, where the subject property-233 North Loomis —is located. Table 1. Residential properties in the 200 Block of North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins Address Stories Year Built Year Remodeled Wall Material Roof form Ftz Style WEST SIDE OF NORTH LOOMIS AVENUE* 229 North Loomis Ave. 1.0 1900 N/A Masonry common brick Hip 864 Classic Cottage 231 North Loomis Ave. 2.0 2017 N/A Frame siding Gable 2,416 + 1,428 (basement) Modern 233 North Loomis Ave. 1.0 1903 2016 Masonry common brick Hip 912 + 912 (basement) Classic Cottage 235 North Loomis Ave. 1.0 1923 1997 Frame siding Gable 1,066 + 946 (basement) Craftsman EAST SIDE OF NORTH LOOMIS AVENUE 210 North Loomis Ave. 1.0 1907 1999 Masonry common brick Hip 11024 + 486 (basement) 224 North Loomis Ave. 1.0 1908 N/A Frame siding Hip 1,310 226 North Loomis Ave. 1.5 1900 2008 Frame siding Hip 1,794 228 North Loomis Ave. 1.5 1898 2010 Frame siding Gable 1,920 230 North Loomis Ave. 1.5 1910 N/A Frame siding Gable 1,794 1= * The southern half of Block 282 in the West Side Addition (including addresses 225 and 227 North Loomis Avenue, is occupied by Fullana Elementary School, on the former site of the historic Laporte Avenue School. The Laporte Avenue School building, which is no longer extant, was designed by prominent early Fort Collins architect Montezuma Fuller, and constructed in 1907. The Fullana Elementary School buildings were constructed in 1975 (and later). Because the school is both relatively distant from the subject property at 233 North Loomis Avenue, and the school's buildings and features are less than 50 years old as of 2018, it was excluded from review. ZI Packet Pg. 67 'F � Oro Jg I Xl��k .I.. r '" �4 -Sri:;. •� . _I i_i.,! 6 % '. 'IAA /J b F Y5 � yrt o r73 ril '� �•�. tf R p r t f 4♦ t _ 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-11.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 235 North Loomis Avenue, built in 1923, next door to 233 North Loomis Street. View looking west. 231 North Loomis Avenue, built in 2017, looking northwest. Packet Pg. 70 2.e Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9141— 233 North Loomis Avenue, Fort Collins 229 North Loomis Avenue, looking west-southwest. Packet Pg. 71 2.f V Planning, Development & Transportation City of Community Development & Neighborhood Services 6rt Collins 281 North College Avenue P.O. Sox 580 (For Office Use Only) Fort Collins, CO 80522,0580 970.416.2740 Property Address: Request for Historic Review: I. Effect of Proposed Demolition or Alteration and/or II. Fort Collins Landmark Eligibility �� K5 1 VI N S Specific building(s) under review: Summary of proposed work: I. Effect of Proposed Demolition or Alteration For a property to maintain historic character when alterations are made to the structure(s) or site, it must retain the essential physical features that enable it to convey that character through seven aspects of physical integrity that are used to evaluate historic properties throughout the United States. Unless requested by the owner, a determination of eligibility (Section 2) is not required for proposed work that is determined to be minor in Section 1. A checkmark signifies retention of that aspect of integrity. Aspects of Integrity Criteria: CDNS LP Rr Materials: The proposed work would retain a significant portion of historic exterior materials (cladding, roof, windows, other: ) ❑ ❑ Design: The proposed work would retain a significant portion of historic exterior features without obscuring them (configuration, proportions, roofline, windottern, historic addition(s), other: A o L s'� ,• �rk�� CY lr Workmanship: The proposed work would not destroy or significantly obscure evidence of historic construction techniques (joinery, carving, turning, ) that exam lify local, regional, or national applications of historic practices and aesthetics. ie VLocation: The proposed work keeps the historic structure(s) on the original site or a site the structure has A ccupied for more than 50 years. ❑ Setting: The proposed work would not significantly alter the physical character of the site that is similar to the histori period of construction and the site's relationship to surrounding features. &' KFeeling: The proposed work would not significantly alter the majority of intact, historic physical features (design, materials, workmanship, setting) that together convey historic character. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support a determination that eligibility would be lost.) S4eovp� ['Association: The proposed work would not remove historic structure(s) from the place where an associated historic eventlactivity occurred and affect the ability of the site to convey that history. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support a determination that eligibility would be lost.) Comments regarding differentiation and reversibility of proposed work: Yes No Director of CDNS 2NoLJ More than one aspect of integrity is being CDNS Director's Signature: (If yes, it is major altera ' n; if no, minor) Date: Yes No LPC Chair E More than one aspect of integrity is being affected? (If yes, it s a major alteratio if no, minor) Comments: 42*4 aPJ1, J w w W z 0 a w FM J Q z 0 J 0 M w 0 J a z LL w O z C) C) TOM 0 0 ti LPC Chair's Signature: 4f Date: Packet Pg. 72 2.f t Planning, Development & Transportation Services OI Community Development & Neighborhood Servii r Collins 281 North College Ave! P.O. Box Fort Collins, CO 80522.01 970.416.2' (For Office Use Only) Property Address: 2?j U-:)O Specific building(s) under review: \nok II. Fort Collins Landmark Eligibility A property must meet at least one of four criteria for significance to be eligible for Fort Collins landmark designation: association with significant historical events (A), with a significant person (B), for architectural design/significance (C), and/or for potential to yield important archeological data (D). The property must also retain enough exterior integrity to convey its significance. The National Register of Historic Places provides guidance for the criteria, aspects of integrity, and process that federal, state, and local entities use to identify and designate historic resources.' A checkmark signifies significance in that area. HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE ❑ A: Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our local, state or national history; and/or ❑ B: Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. Comments: Relevant Aspects of Exterior Integrity for Standards A and B: A basic integrity test for a property associated with an important event (Standard A) or person (Standard B) is whether a historical contemporary would recognize the property as it exists today. Such a property ideally might retain some features of all seven aspects of integrity, but the four aspects in bold are particularly important for a property in this category. A checkmark signifies the property retains that aspect of integrity. CDNS LPC ❑ ❑ Location: The building is on its original site or was moved to the current site more than 50 years ago. ❑ ❑ Setting: The physical character of the property site and its relationship to surrounding features is similar to the historic period ❑ ❑ Materials: The property retains most of its historic exterior materials and they are visible (cladding, roof, windows, other: ) ❑ ❑ Design: Most of the basic features (configuration, proportions, roofline, window pattern, historic addition(s), other: are intact. ❑ ❑ Workmanship: There is evidence of historic construction techniques, such as joinery, carving, turning, that exemplify local, regional, or national applications of historic practices and aesthetics. ❑ ❑ Feeling: The majority of physical features (design, materials, workmanship, setting) that together convey historic character are intact. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support eligibility.) ❑ ❑ Association: The property is the place where the historic event or activity occurs and still conveys that relationship to an observer. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support eligibility.) 1 U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, "How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (National Register Bulletin 15, 1990, revised for Internet, 2002); Fort Collins Municipal Code Section 14-5, "Standards for determining the eligibility of sites, structures, objects, and districts for designation as Fort Collins landmarks or landmark districts," (Code 1972, § 69-6; Ord. No. 186, 2002, § 4, 1-7-03; Ord. 057, 2014 , § 1, 4-15-14). Packet Pg. 73 2.f Planning, Development & Transportation Services FCity of Community Development & Neighborhood Servi ort Collins 281 North College Ave P.O. Box Fort Collins, CO 80522.0 970.416.2 (For Office Use Only) C: Architectural significance: C2'Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction ❑ Property is the work of a master craftsman or architect; ❑ Property possesses high artistic values or design concepts Justification: Relevant Aspects of Exterior Integrity for Standard C: A property significant for its architecture must retain those physical features that characterize the type, period, or method of construction the property represents. The aspects in bold are particularly important for a property in this category. A checkmark signifies the property retains that aspect of integrity. CDNS LPC C� R'Materials: The property retains most of its historic exterior materials and they are visible (cladding, roof, windows, her: L� Rr Design: Most of the basic features (configuration, proportions, roofline, window pattern, historic addition(s), other: are intact. 6;?' Workmanship: There is evidence of historic construction techniques, such as joinery, carving, turning, that exemplify local, regional, of national applications of historic practices and aesthetics) QV Q' Location: The building is on its original site or was moved to the current site more than 50 years ago. 9/ISetting: The physical character of the property site and its relationship to surrounding features is similar to the histo�r c period V li 'Feeling: The majority of physical features (design, materials, workmanship, setting) that together convey historic character are intact. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support Ibility.) q/ Association: The property is the place where the historic event or activity occurs and still conveys that relationship to an observer. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support eligibility.) Packet Pg. 74 2.f Planning, Development & Transportation ServicQs F6rt Clt Of Community Development & Neighborhood Servii Collins 281 North College Ave! P.O. Box Fort Collins, CO 80522.0! 970.416.Z (For Office Use Only) ❑ D: A property that has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Comment: Relevant Aspects of Exterior Intelarity for Standard D: For properties eligible due to their potential to provide data that addresses important research questions, which includes archeological sites and standing structures studied for their information potential, the aspects below are most relevant. Two of the seven aspects, setting and feeling, typically do not have direct bearing for this standard of eligibility. A checkmark signifies the property retains that aspect of integrity. CDNS LPC ❑ ❑ Location: The prehistoric and historic archeological remains on the property are in their original, relatively undisturbed location. ❑ ❑ Materials: The property contains probable or known prehistoric floral or faunal remains or prehistoric and/or historic cultural material that is important for research study. ❑ ❑ Design: The property contains prehistoric and historic cultural material that may yield important data on design technology. ❑ ❑ Workmanship: The property contains prehistoric and historic cultural material that may yield important data on techniques that exemplify prehistoric or historic practices and aesthetics. ❑ ❑ Association: The material remains on the property are relatively undisturbed and retain their association with other material that yields datable information. ❑ ❑ Setting: The physical character of the property site and its relationship to surrounding features is similar to the prehistoric or historic period ❑ ❑ Feeling: The majority of physical features (design, materials, workmanship, setting) that together convey historic character are intact. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support eligibility.) Yes No Director of CDNS Property has significance and is eligible for individual Fort Collins landmark designation? Justification: ❑ �roposed plans would uphold the property's significance, integrity and eligibility? Justification: CDNS Director's Signature: Date: _ 3�/IY Yes No LPC Chair ❑ Property has significance and is eligible for individual Fort Collins landmark designation? Justification:/ ❑ Q Proposed plans would uphold the property's significance, integrity and eligibility? Justification: LPC Chair's Signature: Date: Packet Pg. 75 2.g City of FOrtCottins �` • Construction Date: c. 1903 (Larimer County Tax Assessor) • Community Development and Neighborhood Services (CDNS) Director and Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) Chair Review: • Proposed work is major • Property is individually eligible as a Fort Collins Landmark under Standard C: Design/Construction - great example of a Classic Cottage with high level of integrity Packet Pg. 76 l� u T lI Location and Context K, 233 N Loomis Ave 233 N Loomis Ave Project Summary air A M ■ ■ ■ 2.g City of Fort Collins Approve the application, finding that the applicant has met each of the steps and submittals required by the code; • Fees, posting and notice requirements have been met; • Documentation of the existing structure • Plan of Protection • Fully approved plans - plans comply with relevant city codes City of Fort` • Approve with conditions; conditions may include, but not limited to: • comprehensive photographic documentation; • comprehensive historical, developmental, social and/or architectural documentation of the property and neighborhood and/or • any other mitigating solution agreed upon by the Commission, the applicant, and any other applicable parties Packet Pg. 79 2.g w w w J Q Z w a 0 0 J Z M M N O TOM ti O to C O M d i a �a c m E tU M El Packet Pg. 80 City of Fort Collins i� Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission 08-15-2018 city 01 wort ColI1n�, n M � 233 North Loomis Avenue — Final Demolition/Alteration Review Agenda Item 3 PROJECT NAME EVANS/REIDHEAD PROPERTY, 707 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION STAFF Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: RECOMMENDATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY COMMISSION ACTION This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council regarding landmark designation for the Evans/Reidhead Property, an excellent example of a Dutch Colonial Revival style home from the early 1920s and home of Jim Reidhead. Donna Reidhead, Owner Approval Chapter 14, Article II of the Municipal Code, "Designation Procedures," provides the process and standards for designation of a property as a Fort Collins Landmark. The Commission shall adopt a motion providing a recommendation on eligibility to City Council. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE and EXTERIOR INTEGRITY The Evans/Reidhead Property is significant under Fort Collins Standards B and C. Under Standard B, association with a recognizable local person, this property served as the home of notable Fort Collins resident James (Jim) Reidhead, who spearheaded several development and preservation efforts in the city including the Downtown Development Authority. The house also qualifies under Standard C for its embodiment of the Dutch Colonial Revival style, including elements like a steeply -pitched gambrel roof, long, shed dormer, and cornice returns. This house is also the only example in Fort Collins of a Dutch Colonial Revival style home designed by prominent local architect Montezuma Fuller. The current owner of this property, Donna Reidhead, has submitted an application requesting consideration for Fort Collins local landmark designation. The Evans/Reidhead Property retains excellent integrity: Standard A: Location. This property is located where it was originally constructed. The house has not Item # 3 Page 1 Packet Pg. 82 Agenda Item 3 been moved since its 1922 construction, nor has the garage since its 1924 construction. Standard B: Design. This property retains a combination of elements that create its historic form, plan space, structure, and style. The historic portion of the house appears largely unchanged. Renovations include a roof, balustrade, and columns for the existing concrete porch on the facade; the porch's Tuscan columns match those on the portico. Although the porch roof's exposed rafter tails do not appear elsewhere on the house, they align with Colonial Revival style and mirror those on the 1924 garage. These changes to the porch are reversible and do not significantly impact the design of the house. The addition to the south elevation of the house is not visible from the street and features Dutch Colonial details that are compatible with the original design; the intersecting gambrel addition features shed dormers and windows matching the historic portion. The garage retains integrity similarly, with no apparent alterations to its design. Standard C: Setting. This property retains a character and relationship with its surroundings that reflect how and where it was originally situated in relation to its surrounding features and open space. This property is situated on Mountain Avenue in the Loomis Addition, an area that is still primarily single- family residential. The broad avenue retains its central greenspace. The houses surrounding this property reflect the original character of the neighborhood and do not compromise the property's setting. The property retains the historic driveway it shares with its neighbor to the west; the neighbor's garage has been removed, but the Evans/Reidhead Property garage still sits on its side of the driveway. Standard D: Materials. This property retains much of the historic physical elements that originally formed the property. The house and garage retain original materials, including exterior walls, windows, and doors. Shingles in the front dormer have been replaced with material like the original. The roof was likely wood shingled previously but is now made of more durable asphalt shingles. Windows from the house's original south wall, which was altered during the construction of the rear addition, were integrated into the east side of the addition. The addition uses stucco, matching the original portion of the house. The dormers of the addition resemble the dormer on the fagade, including the wooden shingles. The garage remains a frame structure, as it was in 1924, with what is likely its original hardware. Standard E: Workmanship. This property possesses evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. This consists of evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering the building, structure or site. The house exhibits workmanship through its portico, whose Tuscan columns and segmental arch emphasize the front door. The shed dormer on the fagade is also striking, running two-thirds the length of the building. The garage's large, wooden door slides sideways along an extended track like many garage doors from this period. During the building's alteration in 2000, the owner, Jim Reidhead, and his wife, Donna, took considerable care to arrange for details to reflect the original house, including matching window casings, column details, and more. Standard F: Feeling. This property expresses the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period or time. This results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property's historic character. The design and setting of this property evoke the historical context of growth and neighborhood development in the Loomis Addition during the early twentieth century. The situation of the garage on the alleyway running behind the houses facing Mountain similarly elicits the feeling of the city's early automobile era. Standard G: Association. This property retains an association, or serves as a direct link to, an important historic event or person. In its design, this property retains an association with notable Colorado architect Montezuma Fuller. This property also served as the home of Jim Reidhead, a prominent Item # 3 Page 2 Packet Pg. 83 Agenda Item 3 member of the community and advocate of preservation and city development, who directed the construction of the 2000 rear addition. HISTORICAL INFORMATION Montezuma Fuller, the architect of 707 W. Mountain, was born in 1858 in Horton, Nova Scotia. In his youth, he worked as a ships' carpenter and later went to Kingston, New York, where he met his wife Anna Graham in 1879-80. He moved to Fort Collins in 1880, where he became a skilled carpenter and builder. Anna, her parents, and siblings joined him later that year and they married in 1881. Fuller had a natural ability to draw and became known as an architect; he was soon named the first architect in residence in Fort Collins. Fuller's son, two grandsons, and great grandson all became architects. Fuller is responsible for the design of over seventy-five buildings in Fort Collins. Historic newspapers confirm Fuller's design of the Evans/Reidhead house. The Evans/Reidhead Property is the only known Dutch Colonial Revival -style building Fuller designed in Fort Collins despite the popularity of the design. Fuller incorporated typical Dutch Colonial Revival details including a steeply -pitched gambrel roof, long shed dormer, cornice returns, and Georgian elements, like the shallow fanlight and segmental -pediment portico supported by Tuscan columns emphasizing the front door. Additionally, the house closely resembles a drawing by architect William Radford, which appeared in a 1919 Fort Collins Courier. During the early twentieth century, the Courier regularly featured houses designed by the Radford Architecture Company of Chicago and architect W.W. Purdy, suggesting the popularity of similar designs during this period. Although there is no evidence that Fuller designed the 1924 garage, it has details characteristic of Colonial Revival design and embodies shape and accessibility emblematic of garages in Fort Collins in the early twentieth century. Despite their absence on the main building, the garage's exposed rafter tails are typical of Colonial Revival buildings. The garage's small size, a one -car construction, and its positioning, on the rear of the lot against an alley, are representative of garages designed for the early automobile era in Fort Collins. Its large, wooden, sliding door is indicative of its early twenties construction and contrasts with more common swinging or roll -up door designs. The setting of this property suggests a connection to Fort Collins's City Beautiful efforts. City Beautiful movement adherents believed that improving surroundings would improve citizens' well-being and pursued this goal by widening streets, adding greenspaces, using classical design elements, and ordering spaces. This property lies on a block with an uncommon T-shape, which creates lots with significant yard space; this long, narrow property provided ample space for gardening or landscaping, still evident despite a rear addition. Furthermore, lots on the north side of the block, like the Evans/Reidhead Property, face Mountain Avenue because of this configuration, overlooking the wide, green avenue. These aspects of this property allude to the City Beautiful movement's emphasis on greenspace. Over its history, the Evans/Reidhead Property reflected the development of the Loomis Addition during the 1920s. Mountain Avenue thrived during this period as the street was paved almost all the way to the newly developed park at its west end. Construction of the Evans/Reidhead Property coincided with the pavement of Mountain Avenue and occurred shortly after the construction of the Mountain trolley line to City Park, demonstrating a connection to Fort Collins's transportation history. Middle and upper-class businessmen and professionals moved into the Loomis Addition during this period as the local economy recovered from World War I and began to grow again. The residents of 707 W Mountain mirror this demography and growth. Item # 3 Page 3 Packet Pg. 84 Agenda Item 3 Harry Evans and his wife Joey Lee Evans were the first owners of this house, constructed by R. R. Lindenmeier in 1922. They owned the Evans Book Store and later the Colorado Typewriter and Office Equipment Co. Inc. Joey was treasurer and later president of the latter business. In 1944, the Evans sold their home to Roberta and Edward W. Withrow, who then sold it to Charles and Olive Sandidge in 1945. Eugene and Patricia Markley purchased this property in 1948 and resided there until 1957. The Markleys owned a local business, Markley Ford Motors (then located at 246 N. College), which opened in 1936 and is still owned and operated by the Markley family today. From 1957-1966, Lawrence J. and Gertrude McMillan owned this home. Lawrence was an instructor at Colorado A&M, worked with the local 4-H chapter and university extension services, and later functioned as director of conference services. In 1966, William T. Franklin, professor of agronomy at CSU, and his wife, Elizabeth, purchased the home. After William's death, Elizabeth continued to live there until she sold the home to Jim and Donna Reidhead in 1991. Jim and Donna Reidhead were prominent in the early preservation movement in Fort Collins. They, with their partners Mr. and Mrs. Carey Hewitt, started "The Cupboard," a retail kitchenware store, in 1972 in the historic Northern Hotel building on College Ave. Jim Reidhead went on to help restore several buildings in Old Town through his role as project manager for Old Town Associates/E. E. Mitchell, and Co., managing a renovation and construction team from 1981 to 1985. He was part of the original Old Town Square project in the 1980s, working with Gene Mitchell to revitalize that area of Fort Collins. He helped form the Downtown General Improvement District and the Downtown Development Authority. At Colorado State University, Jim began a program of technical building preservation and community development where he worked with cities and towns throughout the state. Jim also worked as the Director of Land Planning and Marketing at Phantom Canyon Ranch, helping to preserve more than ten thousand acres of land, including one of the last remaining roadless canyons in Colorado. In 1997, Jim started the Rural Land Use Center in Larimer County, an innovative conservation -oriented land development program. In 2009, Jim became the director of Univer-City Connections, a group dedicated to mobilizing citizens within their community to strengthen connections between Colorado State University, downtown Fort Collins, and the Poudre River. The Reidhead family has lived at 707 W Mountain longer than any previous owner. Throughout his life in Fort Collins, Jim Reidhead's respect for and participation in preservation extended to his own home. When he and his wife Donna Reidhead bought this property in 1991, Jim ensured the historical integrity of their home during the construction of an addition to the back of their property. Jim and Donna took great care to make the addition unobtrusive from the street and paid attention to details, like matching new windows and dormers with the original style and materials. The condition of this property represents Jim's dedication to preservation in the city as a whole. Since he and his wife moved to Fort Collins the 1970s, Jim's eye for space and development, and his passion for preservation, encouraged his civic engagement. Parts of Fort Collins would not look the way they do today without the efforts of Jim Reidhead. ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION Construction Date: April 17, 1922 Architect/Builder: Montezuma Fuller Building Materials: Stucco, concrete foundation Architectural Style: Dutch Colonial Revival Description: Situated on the south side of Mountain Avenue, the Evans/Reidhead Property features a house and a garage. The original two-story Dutch Colonial Revival -style house is rectangular in plan, with an asphalt - shingled side -gambrel roof and front porch; an intersecting, gambrel -roofed addition extends to the rear. Item # 3 Page 4 Packet Pg. 85 Agenda Item 3 The house rests on a poured concrete foundation, and the exterior walls are covered with stucco. Composition shingles sheath the steeply -pitched gambrel roof, which features cornice returns on the east and west elevations. A partial -width, shed -roofed dormer projects from the north (front) slope, and a brick chimney rises from the center of the ridge. An exterior, stuccoed chimney on the east elevation terminates in a metal stove pipe above the roof. Windows on the older portion of the house are the original wood four -over -one and six -over -one double -hung sashes, excluding basement windows, which are paired under awnings. Windows on the addition match those of the original in style. The north fagade is nearly symmetrical, with a central front door between matching window sets consisting of a large stationary window flanked by narrow casement windows. Sidelights and a fanlight frame the wood -paneled door and its upper lights. A small portico with Tuscan columns supporting a segmental pediment shelters the entrance. Concrete steps with a wood railing lead up to the portico. A concrete porch extends to the east of the portico with wooden railings and Tuscan columns supporting a low-pitched shed roof. The concrete deck is original, and the roof and railing were added in 1991. The front dormer is centered on the roof slope and runs approximately two-thirds the width of the roof. At each end of the dormer are paired four -over -one windows. The wall section between them is covered in wood shingles and has a central smaller pair of four -light windows. The matching dormer on the south elevation is mostly obscured by the addition. There is a basement window on the west side of the fagade. The west elevation has two basement windows, a single and a paired double -hung window on the first floor to the left and right, respectively, and two single double -hung windows on the second floor. The east elevation has one single double -hung window on the left side of the first floor and two on the second floor. The south elevation of the house is an addition (2000) that continues the Dutch Colonial Revival theme of the house. The addition consists of an intersecting, two-story gambrel -roofed ell. At the south end of the ell, the second story is cantilevered, creating an inset, open porch on the ground level. Tuscan columns, like those on the portico, support this porch. The first floor of the south elevation has a paired, double -hung window and an entry door to its left. The projected second floor has a symmetrical window arrangement: top -justified, two six -over -one windows flank a pair of small, six -light windows; a third small, six -light window of the same size is centered above the inner pair. To the left of the porch on the ell's south elevation, there is a paired four -over one -window. The east and west elevations of the ell each have two six -over -one windows on the first floor and shed - roofed dormers on the second floor with one paired set of windows to the south and one single window to the north. Two of the windows on the second -floor east side are from the original house, moved from the remodeled southern elevation. The east elevation also has a chimney toward its north side. The dormers on both east and west elevations are sheathed with wood shingles like those on the north - facing dormer on the original portion of the house. The first story of the ell is flush with the east wall of the original house. The west side is slightly inset, exposing a narrow portion of the original south wall. It has a west -facing door sheltered by a shed -roofed porch matching the 1991 fagade porch. The door is accessible by a concrete deck. There is an original four -over -one window on the original south elevation and a smaller four -over -one window to the right of the door. An 18.2' X 12.3' garage, constructed in 1924, lies southwest of the house on the alley. The single -car garage has a gable roof with composition shingles and exposed rafter tails, drop siding with corner - boards, and large, sliding wood doors on the north and south elevations. The door likely retains its original hardware. The door's track extends off the edge of the structure, so the door can open fully to accommodate a vehicle; this design choice allowed for the garage to be smaller. The two -sectioned garage door has a wide horizontal beam in the middle, making it resemble a barn door. There is a four - Item # 3 Page 5 Packet Pg. 86 Agenda Item 3 light window on the east elevation and a horizontally symmetrical three -light window on the west elevation. Bill Franklin took out a permit for a new garage in 1977, but there is no evidence to suggest this garage was ever built based on the dimensions, location, and materials of the existing garage and testimony from the current owner, Donna Reidhead. The front lawn is bisected by a concrete walk from the sidewalk to the house. To the west of the house is a historic driveway that runs from Mountain Avenue to the alley. The driveway consists of two concrete strips with gravel in between; the property line between 707 W Mountain and the adjacent house splits this driveway. The front porch is bordered by planting beds with low flagstone walls. Cedar plank fencing surrounds the property on three sides. There is a grape arbor on the west side of the backyard and a brick and flagstone patio to the east of the back -porch addition. A large tree was transplanted from the backyard to the front yard. Because of the age of these features, only the driveway is considered historic. On July 25, 1921 Harry Evans received a warranty deed from Almeda Belle (Mrs. W.N.) de Armond for the east half of Lot 2 and east thirty feet of Lot 3. The 1922, Fort Collins Courier states, W. W. Fuller, architect, is drawing plans for a two story, six room concrete and stucco residence to be built at once for Harry Evans. It will be located in the 700 block on W. Mountain. The contract will be let within a day or two. It will be of Dutch Colonial design and will be a beautiful and well-appointed home." R. R. Lindenmeier built the six -room frame dwelling for $5000. On June 27, 1924, Harry Evans received a permit to build a frame garage, and August 13, 1943, Harry Evans reroofed the house. In 1991, the Reidheads (current owners) added the railings and roof to the front porch on the east end of the fagade. Solar panels were added some time before the Reidheads bought the property but were removed in the mid -nineties. The concrete porch is original and appears in a photograph dated 1922 as well as the 1948 and 1967 tax assessor photographs (figures 2 and 3). Jim and Donna Reidhead built a new addition on the south elevation in 2000 with a compatible Dutch Colonial design. These alterations were approved by the Fort Collins Landmark Preservation Commission. STAFF EVALUATION Staff finds that the Evans/Reidhead Property qualifies for Fort Collins Landmark designation under Designation Standards B and C as an excellent example of a Dutch Colonial Revival style residence associated with notable Fort Collins resident James Reidhead with a preponderance of exterior integrity. The dwelling continues to uphold all seven aspects of integrity. SAMPLE MOTIONS If the Commission finds that the Evans/Reidhead Property meets one or more of the criteria for Fort Collins landmark designation, the Commission shall adopt the following motion: That the Landmark Preservation Commission pass a resolution recommending that City Council designate the McMillen -Patterson Property as a Fort Collins Landmark in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 14, based on the property's significance under Standards B and C, for its association with resident James Reidhead and design as an Dutch Colonial Revival style residence, and its preponderance of exterior integrity. If the Commission finds that the Evans/Reidhead Property does not meet the criteria for landmark designation, it shall adopt a motion to this effect, and state its reasoning. Item # 3 Page 6 Packet Pg. 87 Agenda Item 3 ATTACHMENTS 1. Landmark Designation Owner Agreement (PDF) 2. Location Map (PDF) 3. Photographs (DOCX) 4. Reference Materials(DOCX) 5. Staff Presentation (PDF) Item # 3 Page 7 Packet Pg. 88 3.a AGREEMENT The undersigned owner(s) hereby agrees that the property described herein be considered for local historic landmark designation, pursuant to the Fort Collins Landmark Preservation Ordinance, Chapter 14 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins. I understand that upon designation, I or my successors will be requested to notify the Secretary of the Landmark Preservation Commission at the City of Fort Collins prior to the occurrence of any of the following: Preparation of plans for reconstruction or alteration of the exterior of the improvements on the property, or; Preparation of plans for construction of, addition to, or demolition of improvements on the property DATED this 3 I S+ un Clt'1 l'C2.1 i l Q Owner Name (please print) Owner Signature day of � �,l � , 201� State of l_,K11 Dra-Q ) County of L0.x 1 s} Subscribed and sworn before me this 3t by )an A0" )ss. day of J� 201 `b , Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires KIANA SADE �CARTraja STATE OF COLORADO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT013ER Notary Revised 08-2014 Page 9 Packet Pg. 89 I }rrr pTq {� N J _ a •.. - 1 - - —.-- -- --4w _ r owl ri I _ ]MIT w In T LL AUK ®r Kr Am�- 4r rr er Oki 41, 1 ^_ �• r 1 -I-, Rk 6Q; i 41 cc .—tillI. '^fi �L It IL '�.-� e 1 g�l iLL oij k�jIK'1 !'" • i �. �j�i.Sl I Arm t il w ILA + a��• 'ERR `1 - mY '�i 1 . Iyv}:,gip y.• n 1 LOUy y I 3 t � �• P-.. 9 G- o .�'NFLTOO WL ■T�� , ■. :^,tea. a. i � � ` ,� R IS Owl Packet 4 1 y� - 5 .A ' k1�11 � h -•�, to - X • • • ' 3.c 707 West Mountain Photographs p . 7� s • Al" - Figure 1: c. 1922 Photograph A Figure 2: 1948 Tax Assessor Photograph Y a 0 z a J N z J J O (U H O LL w O w z O_ V ` J a a Q w D z w a z Q z O ti 0 ti w a w a a w 0 w CO z a w 0 N O � y t Q m o 0 a Packet Pg. 91 A4' AZam Ir 7 ty i r ^v 1 may` '"F. J: \ryyLL 1 - i yr: Y - t r F 7 707 ork WPM 3.c A M&W Figure 5: Fagade, Portico Detail (Mary Humstone) Figure 6: Fagade, Added Porch and Railing (Reyana Jones) Y a 0 z J CO z J J O U H O LL - O LL z O U J a a a w z w a z Q z 0 O ti 0 ti w a O a 0 a w 0 w CO z a w 0 N O a Packet Pg, 93 3.c FqF Figure 7: Fagade, Basement Windows (Reyana Jones) Figure 8: West Elevation (Reyana Jonf Y Q Z Q J Z J J O U H O LL O a_ z O H Q U J a a a W D z W Q z a z D O ti 0 ti H W a O W a 0 a W 0 w z a W 0 N O ti N L Q i O O a m E ca a Packet Pg. 94 3.c �. Figure 9: Driveway and Garage (Reyana Jones) Ter � I !Illillll`ilnilllili,, 111 Ii t Figure 10: East Elevation and North Fagade (Mary Humstone) Packet Pg. 95 ,ct •a1 4 N .,lie 61 M . off } r I ,{* '„ R'' �C y. ryk., •• ,fir Y �..., - >„`z_:. tL.im •�'In' m4 NNoote_.. i dl 3.c d' if f,. 77 ` VCO r LL LL Figure 15: Garage, North Elevation (Reyana Jones) r Ib'u1C 1u. CJCII a]V'C, VVCJL CICVCILKJII kRt=YCII ld JVI ICJ) L :.i a Packet Pg. 98 4 f,c F� , + c 47,. 3.d REFERENCE LIST or SOURCES of INFORMATION Bennett, Virginia. "Colorado Architects Biographical Sketch: Montezuma Fuller." History Colorado. http://www. legacy. historycolorado.org/sites/default/files/files/OAHP/Guides/Architects_fuller_montezuma.p df. Colorado State University Digital Collections. Colorado State University. Fort Collins, CO. https://dspace.library.colostate.edu/. Deed. Book 427. Larimer County Court House. Fort Collins, CO. Ferrier, Pat. "'Elder Statesman' of Downtown Fort Collins Dies." Coloradoan. November 2, 2016. Fort Collins History Connection. Fort Collins Museum of Discovery and Poudre River Public Library District. Fort Collins, CO. https:Hhistory.fcgov.com/. Humstone, Mary, Rheba Massey, and Carly -Ann Anderson. "Loomis Addition Historic Context." Prepared for the City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Program. Fort Collins, CO: Humstone Consulting, 2015. Local History Archive. Fort Collins Museum of Discovery. Fort Collins, CO. Reidhead, Donna. Interviewed by Reyana Jones. Fort Collins, CO. June 6, 2018. Young, David. "UniverCity Changes Director; Doug Johnson Will Leave Just Before End of Two -Year Term." Coloradoan. October 19, 2009. Packet Pg. 100 City of Fort Collins i� 4". city o� • ' �.-•.r. =; �. �7 in u Yani Jones, Historic Preservation Intern Landmark Preservation Commission 08.15.2018 Application for Fort Collins Landmark Designation — Evans/Reidhead Property Location and Context m of m rn. m m n�. . a _ _ 'AM_ L 707 W Mountain—Evans/Reidhead Property " 4 4 • Fagade, North Elevation K, 707 W Mountain—Evans/Reidhead Property dd MI L � Fagade, North Elevation a : Rwvf ,p 707 W Mountain—Evans/Reidhead Property 1F LK c South Elevation 5 707 W Mountain—Evans/Reidhead Property ft Val Val �j East Elevation s 3.e City of FortCollins \` City of F„ortCollins �, - - i U) z J J O H O LL w O LL z O H J a a a w D z w a z z D cO G ti w a O a a w 0 w CO z a w N O il Packet Pg. 104 3.e City of FttCollins f� RW• mpp� Montezuma Fuller City of F6rt Collins Jim Reidhead acting as director of the Larimer County Rural Land Use Center Alpert Block of P ■ .. n -� v Laurel School (330 E Laurel) UNIVERCITY CONNECTIONS CSL', Douq Taum and the Poud" Reidhead served as director of UniverCity Connections. 06( 6#t Peter Anderson House (300 S. Howes) Reidhead was involved with the Old Town Square project in the 1980s. Packet Pg. 105 3.e City of Fort Collins • Constructed in 1922 • Standard 13: People —Associated with Jim Reidhead, a community member influential in city development, especially the establishment of Old Town Square • Standard C: Design/Construction — Montezuma Fuller architect; Dutch Colonial Revival style • Exterior Integrity: Location, Design, Setting, Materials, Workmanship, Feeling, and Association City of FOrtCollins �` Chapter 14, Article 11 of the Municipal Code, "Designation Procedures: " • Determine if property meets the criteria of a Fort Collins landmark • Must possess both significance and exterior integrity • Context of the area surrounding the property shall be considered Sec. 14-22(a): If all owners consent in writing, and a majority of Commission approves: • Commission may adopt a resolution recommending to the City Council the designation Packet Pg. 106 City of Fort Collins i� Yani Jones, Historic Preservation Intern Landmark Preservation Commission 08.15.2018 city 01 - wort Col�1n�, `, n M � Application for Fort Collins Landmark Designation — Evans/Reidhead Property Agenda Item 4 PROJECT NAME TRIMBLE/TAYLOR/DIXON PROPERTY 817 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION STAFF Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council regarding landmark designation for the Trimble/Taylor/Dixon Property, an excellent example of a Classic Cottage from 1905. APPLICANT: Shelly Terry, Owner RECOMMENDATION: Approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND The Trimble/Taylor/Dixon Property is significant under Fort Collins Landmark Designation Standard C, for its embodiment of the Classic Cottage style, a popular house style in the Loomis Addition in which this residence is located. The property also has a contributing 1954 wood frame, single car garage. The Trimble/Taylor/Dixon house, like many Classic Cottages, has late Victorian features such as arched window and door hoods, brick belt courses and decorative wood shingles, as well as classical features such as porch columns and cornice returns. The current owner of this property, Shelly Terry, has submitted an application requesting consideration for Fort Collins local landmark designation. COMMISSION ACTION Chapter 14, Article II of the Municipal Code, "Designation Procedures," provides the process and standards for designation of a property as a Fort Collins Landmark. The Commission shall adopt a motion providing a recommendation on eligibility to City Council. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE and EXTERIOR INTEGRITY The residence at 817 West Mountain Avenue is significant under Standard C for its architecture, as a good example of a Classic Cottage, the most prevalent house form in the Loomis Addition in which this property is located. The typical Classic Cottage is a one-story house with a square or rectangular floor plan, hipped roof, a front dormer or gable and usually a full or three-quarter- width front porch. The Trimble/Taylor/Dixon house, like many Classic Cottages, has late Victorian features such as arched window and door hoods, brick belt courses and decorative wood shingles, as well as classical features such as porch columns and cornice returns. These houses were the mainstay of the middle class, and were frequently mentioned in early twentieth century building reports in Fort Collins. Item # 4 Page 1 Packet Pg. 108 Agenda Item 4 The property retains a preponderance of exterior integrity, as follows: Standard A: Location. Integrity of location is present, as the residence is still in its original location in the Loomis Addition. Standard B: Design. Integrity of design is defined as "the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property." The building retains integrity of design overall as the design of the original red brick portion of the home is representative of the Classic Cottage style. The original decorative brick work, fishscale shingling, and retention of all original fenestration indicate a high level of integrity of design. The addition on the south elevation is unobtrusive but easily visible from the public right-of-way, particularly on the eastern elevation. However, the rear addition is subordinate to the original brick structure and does not compromise the original roofline. Standard C: Setting. The property which is part of a block of residential homes substantially retains its integrity of setting. The construction of the large two-story home on the lot to the west of the residence impacts the setting somewhat, however the integrity of setting is still strong due to the property's location in a neighborhood of single- family homes. Standard D: Materials. This property retains much of the historic physical elements that originally formed the property. Much of the original construction materials remain intact and highly visible. In the original brick portion of the residence, four of nine original wooden windows are still present. All windows in the original brick portion retain original sandstone sills. All of the original brickwork is still present with the exception of some near the rear addition that has been obscured by the addition of modern siding. This modern siding also covers the original wooden siding that is still present and likely in good condition, according to the owner. In the front gable, original decorative fishscale shingling and a six light window remain. Despite the obscuring of some of the original brick near the addition, the interior of the addition retains the original southern brick elevation and original openings. Standard E: Workmanship. This property possesses evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. This consists of evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering the building, structure or site. The structure retains a high level of workmanship, seen in the brickwork details and fish -scale shingled gable. Standard F: Feeling. Integrity of feeling is defined as "a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time." This property evokes the feeling of a turn of the century single-family home, one of many such homes in the historic Loomis Addition during a time of intense residential growth in Fort Collins. Standard G: Association. Integrity of association is defined as "the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property." The property sustains a strong association with its past as one of several homes constructed in Fort Collins by "community builder" Roy Portner in the Loomis Addition. HISTORICAL INFORMATION In 1887, Abner Loomis platted the Loomis Addition to make room for Fort Collins' growing population in the western part of town. The fifteen blocks that make up the Loomis Addition are bounded by Whitcomb Street to the east, Washington Avenue to the west, Laporte Avenue to the north, and Mulberry Street to the south. Mountain Avenue, where this home is situated, formed the heart of the Loomis Addition, with mature deciduous trees, stylish homes, and wide median with the trolley line. Loomis designed Mountain Avenue to be one of two main east -west avenues (the other being Laporte). In the mid-1880s, improvements to the area made the Loomis Addition a desirable place to live. In 1886, the town constructed a sewer along Mountain Avenue which helped control issues with standing water that had plagued the area with "miasma and mosquitos." After this reclamation, citizens and investors began purchasing parcels in the Loomis Addition to build homes. According to a July, 1887 Fort Collins Courier article, eighty lots in the Loomis Addition sold in the first month. Item # 4 Page 2 Packet Pg. 109 Agenda Item 4 A nationwide financial disaster in the 1890s slowed development in Fort Collins and throughout Colorado and the American West. The Panic of 1893 resulted in the failure of more than 15,000 companies, 500 banks, and left 19% of Americans unemployed throughout the U.S. As banks failed, many Americans lost their life savings and were unable to pay their mortgages. Although Colorado was further impacted by the repeal of the Sherman Silver Purchase Act, Fort Collins was not hit as hard as other parts of the state. Fort Collins' two banks remained in operation and new businesses established in the city. A January 1894 Fort Collins Courier article noted that in 18937 citizens invested over $60,000 in new buildings (although none of these were in the Loomis Addition). In the years following the Panic of 1893, development of Fort Collins continued. In 1905, builders Roy Porter and Roys and Hampton constructed the home at 817 West Mountain Avenue. According a Weekly Courier report on December 27, 1905, the construction cost the builder $1,600. This Classic Cottage style home with brick exterior fit well with other homes in the Loomis Addition, many of which were of a similar style. Roy Portner was a prominent citizen and builder in Fort Collins. Portner came to Colorado in 1902 at the age of seventeen and began building houses in 1904. The building records of three Loomis Addition homes list Portner as owner: a 5-room frame cottage at 800 West Mountain Avenue (1904), and in 1905, 5-room brick cottages at 815 (now 813) and 817 West Mountain Avenue. The three Loomis Addition houses associated with Portner were originally identical Classic Cottage style homes: two with brick exteriors and one with a frame exterior. The home at 813 W. Mountain has been severely altered, but the residences at 800 and 817 West Mountain retain their integrity. Porter involved himself in diverse businesses and took an active role in the community. In addition to building houses, Portner also pursued business in real estate, owning numerous residential, ranching, and business properties. Portner also had a national reputation as an expert on irrigation systems. In 1906 he started building reservoirs, and in 1920, he organized the Mountain and Plains Irrigation Company. He also served as the City Commissioner of Finance, a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission, on the Regional Planning Committee, and on the board of Home Federal Savings and Loan Association. In 1976, Portner passed away but his legacy lived on in Fort Collins through the many homes he helped construct. The first resident of the Trimble/Taylor/Dixon house in 1906 was Laura Trimble, a member of the prominent pioneer William and Kate Trimble family. The current Trimble Court Alley in Old Town Fort Collins was named after this family. According to City Directories, Trimble was the first in a long list of residents who occupied the house for only a short time. The next residents to occupy the property for more than a few years were Jeff and Myra Taylor. The Taylors occupied the property for almost twenty years. In the 1950s, the home was occupied by Thomas Story and his wife June. Story was a bookkeeper for Ideal Cement in Fort Collins. After the Storys left the home in 1956, a few other short term residents occupied the property until the Dixons moved in in 1962. The Dixons, who lived in the house for twenty-six years were the longest residents until the current owner. The Dixons descended from of a pioneering Fort Collins family. Ralph Lee and Velma Dixon lived here while he worked for the Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Department, where he worked until his retirement in 1974. Velma died in 1985 and Ralph in 1988. The current owner, Shelly Terry, purchased the house in 1989 from their estate. As of 2018, Shelly Terry occupied the property for 29 years, making her the longest resident to occupy the Trimble/Taylor/Dixon house. After completing her graduate work and receiving a teaching certificate from UNC, Shelly Terry moved to Fort Collins in 1972. She taught kindergarten and music in the Poudre School District until her retirement in 1995. After her retirement, Terry "missed teaching, but wanted to work with 1 or 2 children at a time." She turned to privately teaching piano. This change was a "natural fit" for Terry who played piano since age three, and studied seriously for thirteen years. With the switch to piano education, Terry studied piano pedagogy at CSU, and has now taught students from the ages of 5 to 85 over her 18 years of teaching. Terry continues to offer lessons privately out of her home at 817 W. Mountain Ave. sharing her love of music and her historic home with her students Item # 4 Page 3 Packet Pg. 110 Agenda Item 4 ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION Construction Date: 1905 Architect/Builder: Roy Portner and Roys and Hampton Building Materials: Brick, sandstone Architectural Style: Classic Cottage Much of the following architectural information is from Massey's 2016 Architectural Inventory Form. Additional information and clarification by Kylee Cole. The residence at 817 West Mountain Avenue is a one-story, hipped -roof house in the Classic Cottage style constructed in 1905 with a later rear addition constructed before 1948. The original rectangular -plan residence is brick laid in running bond with a sandstone foundation. The low-pitched, hipped -roof porch has six Tuscan -style columns and a wood balustrade. The porch deck is concrete covered with modern brick -style tiles, and the ceiling is beadboard. The front door is oak with four panels and has a wood screen door set in a bricked arched opening. The door is flanked by large, 1-over-1 double -hung windows. Like the rest of the windows in the brick portion of the house, these windows are set in bricked arched openings and have sandstone lug sills. This elevation features vinyl -frame windows. A decorative brick course located just below the window arches extends all around the brick portion of the house. The medium -pitched, hipped roof is sheathed with asphalt shingles and has boxed eaves. According to building permits, the roof was reshingled in 1947 and again in 2010. A brick chimney with a corbelled collar is centered at the peak of the roof. A gable centered on the front slope of the roof is sheathed with fish -scale shingles, and has a square, 6-light stationary window, and cornice returns. The original portion of the east elevation has one double -hung window on the northern end and one pair of double - hung windows on the southern end, which match those of the fagade. These windows are wooden windows, two of which are covered by aluminum storm windows on the exterior. The west elevation has four individual 1-over-1 double -hung windows in the brick portion. The southern -most window is an original wood -framed window with a chain at the top allowing the window to open and function like a transom, the next a 1-over-1 double -hung wooden storm window over a single pane window, the third a vinyl -frame 1-over-1 storm window. The northern -most window on the west elevation is also a vinyl frame storm window matching the windows of the fagade. At the rear of the house, an original 6' x 12' back porch was enclosed, and an addition built onto the south elevation at an unknown date prior to 1948. The addition has a shed roof and concrete foundation, and the walls are sheathed with lap siding. The current owner covered the original wooden siding on the addition in 1993 with the current white, vinyl -coated aluminum alloy siding. This siding matches the original horizontal wood siding in dimension and design (lapped), but is composed of a more durable, weather-proof material to protect the original wood. From the interior of the home, it is clear that the addition did not take away from the original brick structure. The addition retained the original brick on the interior wall, now painted white. The doorway remains in its original location. The east elevation of the enclosed porch has two 6-over-1 double -hung windows and a three -paneled wood door with one upper light that accesses the basement. The east elevation of the rear addition has a small, flat -roofed, open porch supported by two wood posts with a concrete deck and a wood balustrade. The porch roof extends to the north to shelter the basement door. The side door (accessed by the porch) is wood paneled with three horizontal lights and has a wood screen door. There are two 1-over-1 double -hung windows to the south of the door. The south elevation (addition) has a pair of picture windows flanked by narrow 1-over-1 double hung windows. The front yard is grass lawn with foundation plantings. A chain -link fence extends across the rear of the yard (approximately 2/3 down the lot) and a cedar wood fence is along the west property line of the house. A wire fence is along the east property line. Item # 4 Page 4 Packet Pg. 111 Agenda Item 4 In addition to the residence, there are two associated, buildings on the property. The first, a contributing 14' x 22' single car garage faces the alley at the rear of the property. The low-pitched, gable -roofed garage has composition roof shingles and white, vinyl -coated aluminum alloy siding siding. The original wooden lap siding was replaced in 1993 when the siding on the home's addition was changed. There is a wood overhead garage door on the south elevation and a wood -paneled entry door with one upper light on the east elevation. According to the 1954 Annual Assessment on the 1948 Tax Assessor record, the garage was built in 1954 and is typical of garages of the era. The garage is similar in style to other detached single car garages in the neighborhood, and contributes to the feeling of a historic residence, despite a loss of historic materials. The second, a non-contributing 8' x 10' metal modern utility building is set adjacent to the garage. STAFF EVALUATION Staff finds that the Trimble/Taylor/Dixon Property qualifies for Fort Collins Landmark designation under Designation Standard C as an excellent example of a Classic Cottage residence associated with the development of the Loomis Addition with a preponderance of exterior integrity. The dwelling continues to uphold all seven aspects of integrity. SAMPLE MOTIONS If the Commission finds that the Trimble/Taylor/Dixon Property meets one or more of the criteria for Fort Collins landmark designation, the Commission shall adopt the following motion: That the Landmark Preservation Commission pass a resolution recommending that City Council designate the Trimble/Taylor/Dixon Property as a Fort Collins Landmark in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 14, based on the property's significance under Standard C for its history as a Classic Cottage residence, and its preponderance of exterior integrity. If the Commission finds that the Trimble/Taylor/Dixon Property does not meet the criteria for landmark designation, it shall adopt a motion to this effect, and state its reasoning. ATTACHMENTS 1. Landmark Designation Application (PDF) 2. Location Map (PDF) 3. Staff Presentation (PDF) Item # 4 Page 5 Packet Pg. 112 4.a City of Fort Collins Planning, Development & Transportation Service Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Fort Collins Landmark Designation LOCATION INFORMATION: Address: 817 West Mountain Avenue Legal Description: West 35 feet of Lot 6, Block 290, Loomis Addition, Fort Collins, Colorado Property Name (historic and/or common): Trimble/Taylor/Dixon Property Other Names (historic and/or common): N/A OWNER INFORMATION: Name: Shelly Terry Address: 817 West Mountain Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 Contact: Shelly Terry, Owner, shelly.terrv@mvgait.com, 970-484-0892 CLASSIFICATION Category Ownership Designation ❑ Building ❑ Public ❑ Structure ❑ Private Register ❑ Site ❑ Object ❑ District FORM PREPARED BY: Status ❑ Occupied ❑ Unoccupied Present Use ❑ Commercial ❑ Educational ❑ Religious ❑ Residential ❑ Entertainment ❑ Government ❑ Other Existing ❑ Nat'l Register ❑ State Name and Title: Kylee Cole, Historic Preservation Intern Address: City of Fort Collins, Historic Preservation Department, P.O. Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522 Contact: Maren Bzdek, Senior Historic Preservation Planner, mbzdek@fcgov.com Relationship to Owner: None. DATE: July 2018 rm 0 a U Q a Q c 0 ca a� .y W 0 Y i ca E c ca J a� E U ca Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 113 4.a TYPE OF DESIGNATION and BOUNDARIES ❑ Individual Landmark Property ❑ Landmark District Explanation of Boundaries: The boundaries of the Trimble/Taylor/Dixon Property correspond to the legal description of the parcel noted above. The property consists of the individually eligible residence, a contributing 1954 wood frame single car garage, and a non-contributing metal utility shed. SIGNIFICANCE: Significance is the importance of a site, structure, object or district to the history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture of our community, state or nation. For designation as Fort Collins Landmarks or Fort Collins Landmark Districts properties must meet one (1) or more of the following standards: ❑ Standard A: Events. This property is associated with events that have made a recognizable contribution to the broad patterns of the history of the community, State or Nation. It is associated with either (or both) of these two (2) types of events: 1. ❑ A specific event marking an important moment in Fort Collins prehistory or history; and/or 2. ❑ A pattern of events or a historic trend that made a recognizable contribution to the development of the community, State or Nation. ❑ Standard B: Persons/Groups. This property is associated with the lives of persons or groups of persons recognizable in the history of the community, State or Nation whose specific contributions to that history can be identified and documented. ❑ Standard C: Design/Construction. This property embodies the identifiable characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; represents the work of a craftsman or architect whose work is distinguishable from others by its characteristic style and quality; possesses high artistic values or design concepts; or is part of a recognizable and distinguishable group of properties. ❑ Standard D: Information potential. This property has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. EXTERIOR INTEGRITY: Exterior integrity is the ability of a site, structure, object or district to be able to convey its significance. The exterior integrity of a resource is based on the degree to which it retains all or some of seven (7) aspects or qualities: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. All seven qualities do not need to be present for a site, structure, object or district to be eligible as long as the overall sense of past time and place is evident. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE and EXTERIOR INTEGRITY: The residence at 817 West Mountain Avenue is significant under Standard C for its architecture, as a good example of a Classic Cottage, the most prevalent house form in the Loomis Addition in which this property is located. The typical Classic Cottage is a one-story house with a square or rectangular floor plan, hipped roof, a front dormer or gable and usually a full or three-quarter- width front porch. The Trimble/Taylor/Dixon house, like many Classic Cottages, has late Victorian features such as arched window and door hoods, brick belt courses and decorative wood shingles, as well as classical features such as porch columns and cornice returns. These houses were the mainstay of the middle class, and were frequently mentioned in early twentieth century building reports in Fort Collins. _ 0 U Q a a _ 0 _ .y N Y �a E _ �a J m E �a El Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 114 4.a The property retains a preponderance of exterior integrity, as follows: ® Standard A: Location. Integrity of location is defined as "the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred." The building retains integrity of location as it occupies its original location in the Loomis Addition of Fort Collins. ® Standard B: Design. Integrity of design is defined as "the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property." Overall, the design of the original red brick portion of the home is representative of the Classic Cottage style. The original decorative brick work, fishscale shingling, and retention of all original fenestration indicate a high level of integrity of design. The addition on the south elevation is unobtrusive but easily visible from the public right-of- way, particularly on the eastern elevation. However, the rear addition is subordinate to the original brick structure and does not compromise the original roofline. ® Standard C: Setting. The property which is part of a block of residential homes substantially retains its integrity of setting. The construction of the large two-story home on the lot to the west of the residence impacts the setting somewhat, however the integrity of setting is still strong due to the property's location in a neighborhood of single-family homes. ® Standard D: Materials. This property retains much of the historic physical elements that originally formed the property. Much of the original construction materials remain intact and highly visible. In the original brick portion of the residence, four of nine original wooden windows are still present. All windows in the original brick portion retain original sandstone sills. All of the original brickwork is still present with the exception of some near the rear addition that has been obscured by the addition of modern siding. This modern siding also covers the original wooden siding that is still present and likely in good condition, according to the owner. In the front gable, original decorative fishscale shingling and a six light window remain. Despite the obscuring of some of the original brick near the addition, the interior of the addition retains the original southern brick elevation and original openings (fig. 16). ® Standard E: Workmanship. This property possesses evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. This consists of evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering the building, structure or site. The structure retains a high level of workmanship, seen in the brickwork details and fish -scale shingled gable. ® Standard F: Feeling. Integrity of feeling is defined as "a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time." This property evokes the feeling of a turn of the century single-family home, one of many such homes in the historic Loomis Addition during a time of intense residential growth in Fort Collins. ® Standard G: Association. Integrity of association is defined as "the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property." The property sustains a strong association with its past as one of several homes constructed in Fort Collins by "community builder" Roy Portner in the Loomis Addition. HISTORICAL INFORMATION In 1887, Abner Loomis platted the Loomis Addition to make room for Fort Collins' growing population in the western part of town. The fifteen blocks that make up the Loomis Addition are bounded by Whitcomb Street to the east, Washington Avenue to the west, Laporte Avenue to the north, and Mulberry Street to the south. Mountain Avenue, where this home is situated, formed the heart of the Loomis Addition, with mature deciduous trees, stylish homes, and wide median with a 0 U Q a a 0 .y MIX a� 0 �a E �a J m E �a El Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 115 4.a the trolley line. Loomis designed Mountain Avenue to be one of two main east -west avenues (the other being Laporte)..' In the mid-1880s, improvements to the area made the Loomis Addition a desirable place to live. In 1886, the town constructed a sewer along Mountain Avenue which helped control issues with standing water that had plagued the area with "miasma and mosquitos.".' After this reclamation, citizens and investors began purchasing parcels in the Loomis Addition to build homes. According to a July, 1887 Fort Collins Courier article, eighty lots in the Loomis Addition sold in the first month. ' A nationwide financial disaster in the 1890s slowed development in Fort Collins and throughout Colorado and the American West. The Panic of 1893 resulted in the failure of more than 15,000 companies, 500 banks, and left 19% of Americans unemployed throughout the U.S.' As banks failed, many Americans lost their life savings and were unable to pay their mortgages. Although Colorado was further impacted by the repeal of the Sherman Silver Purchase Act, Fort Collins was not hit as hard as other parts of the state. Fort Collins' two banks remained in operation and new businesses established in the city. A January 1894 Fort Collins Courier article noted that in 1893, citizens invested over $60,000 in new buildings (although none of these were in the Loomis Addition). In the years following the Panic of 1893, development of Fort Collins continued. In 1905, builders Roy Porter and Roys and Hampton constructed the home at 817 West Mountain Avenue. According a Weekly Courier report on December 27, 1905, the construction cost the builder $1,600. This Classic Cottage style home with brick exterior fit well with other homes in the Loomis Addition, many of which were of a similar style. Roy Portner was a prominent citizen and builder in Fort Collins. Portner came to Colorado in 1902 at the age of seventeen and began building houses in 1904. The building records of three Loomis Addition homes list Portner as owner: a 5-room frame cottage at 800 West Mountain Avenue (1904), and in 1905, 5-room brick cottages at 815 (now 813) and 817 West Mountain Avenue. The three Loomis Addition houses associated with Portner were originally identical Classic Cottage style homes: two with brick exteriors and one with a frame exterior. The home at 813 W. Mountain has been severely altered, but the residences at 800 and 817 West Mountain retain their integrity. Porter involved himself in diverse businesses and took an active role in the community. In addition to building houses, Portner also pursued business in real estate, owning numerous residential, ranching, and business properties. Portner also had a national reputation as an expert on irrigation systems. In 1906 he started building reservoirs, and in 1920, he organized the Mountain and Plains Irrigation Company. He also served as the City Commissioner of Finance, a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission, on the Regional Planning Committee, and on the board of Home Federal Savings and Loan Association. In 1976, Portner passed away but his legacy lived on in Fort Collins through the many homes he helped construct.5 The first resident of the Trimble/Taylor/Dixon house in 1906 was Laura Trimble, a member of the prominent pioneer William and Kate Trimble family. The current Trimble Court Alley in Old Town Fort Collins was named after this family. According to City Directories, Trimble was the first in a long list of residents who occupied the house for only a short time. The next residents to occupy the property for more than a few years were Jeff and Myra Taylor. The Taylors occupied the property for almost twenty years. In the 1950s, the home was occupied by Thomas Story and his wife June. 'Mary Humstone, et al, Loomis Addition Historic Context (Fort Collins, CO: Humstone Consulting, 2015), 18. Loomis Context, 18. 2 Ansel Watrous in Mary Humstone, et al, Loomis Addition Historic Context (Fort Collins, CO: Humstone Consulting, 2015), 16. 'Humstone, 19. 41bid., 22. 5 Rheba Massey, Loomis Addition Historic Resource Survey: Architectural Inventory Form 817 W. Mountain, 2016. TM N 0 ti a 0 U Q a a 0 .y a� 0 �a E �a J C d E t U M El Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 116 4.a Story was a bookkeeper for Ideal Cement in Fort Collins. After the Storys left the home in 1956, a few other short term residents occupied the property until the Dixons moved in in 1962. The Dixons, who lived in the house for twenty-six years were the longest residents until the current owner. The Dixons descended from of a pioneering Fort Collins family. Ralph Lee and Velma Dixon lived here while he worked for the Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Department, where he worked until his retirement in 1974. Velma died in 1985 and Ralph in 1988. The current owner, Shelly Terry, purchased the house in 1989 from their estate. As of 2018, Shelly Terry occupied the property for 29 years, making her the longest resident to occupy the Trimble/Taylor/Dixon house. After completing her graduate work and receiving a teaching certificate from UNC, Shelly Terry moved to Fort Collins in 1972. She taught kindergarten and music in the Poudre School District until her retirement in 1995. After her retirement, Terry "missed teaching, but wanted to work with 1 or 2 children at a time." She turned to privately teaching piano. This change was a "natural fit" for Terry who played piano since age three, and studied seriously for thirteen years. With the switch to piano education, Terry studied piano pedagogy at CSU, and has now taught students from the ages of 5 to 85 over her 18 years of teaching..6 Terry continues to offer lessons privately out of her home at 817 W. Mountain Ave. sharing her love of music and her historic home with her students. ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION Construction Date: 1905 Architect/Builder: Roy Portner and Roys and Hampton Building Materials: Brick, sandstone Architectural Style: Classic Cottage Much of the following architectural information is from Massey's 2016 Architectural Inventory Form. Additional information and clarification by Kylee Cole. The residence at 817 West Mountain Avenue is a one-story, hipped -roof house in the Classic Cottage style constructed in 1905 with a later rear addition constructed before 1948. The original rectangular -plan residence is brick laid in running bond with a sandstone foundation. The low- pitched, hipped -roof porch has six Tuscan -style columns and a wood balustrade. The porch deck is concrete covered with modern brick -style tiles, and the ceiling is beadboard. The front door is oak with four panels and has a wood screen door set in a bricked arched opening. The door is flanked by large, 1-over-1 double -hung windows. Like the rest of the windows in the brick portion of the house, these windows are set in bricked arched openings and have sandstone lug sills. This elevation features vinyl -frame windows. A decorative brick course located just below the window arches extends all around the brick portion of the house. The medium -pitched, hipped roof is sheathed with asphalt shingles and has boxed eaves. According to building permits, the roof was reshingled in 1947 and again in 2010. A brick chimney with a corbelled collar is centered at the peak of the roof. A gable centered on the front slope of the roof is sheathed with fish -scale shingles, and has a square, 6-light stationary window, and cornice returns. The original portion of the east elevation has one double -hung window on the northern end and one pair of double -hung windows on the southern end, which match those of the fagade. These windows are wooden windows, two of which are covered by aluminum storm windows on the exterior. _ 0 cu U Q a a _ 0 _ .y N 0 �a E _ �a J m E U M El 6 Shelly Terry, e-mail message to Kylee Cole, July 5, 2018. Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 117 4.a The west elevation has four individual 1-over-1 double -hung windows in the brick portion. The southern -most window is an original wood -framed window with a chain at the top allowing the window to open and function like a transom, the next a 1-over-1 double -hung wooden storm window over a single pane window, the third a vinyl -frame 1-over-1 storm window. The northern- most window on the west elevation is also a vinyl frame storm window matching the windows of the fagade. At the rear of the house, an original 6' x 12' back porch was enclosed, and an addition built onto the south elevation at an unknown date prior to 1948. The addition has a shed roof and concrete foundation, and the walls are sheathed with lap siding. The current owner covered the original wooden siding on the addition in 1993 with the current white, vinyl -coated aluminum alloy siding. This siding matches the original horizontal wood siding in dimension and design (lapped), but is composed of a more durable, weather-proof material to protect the original wood..' From the interior of the home, it is clear that the addition did not take away from the original brick structure. The addition retained the original brick on the interior wall, now painted white. The doorway remains in its original location. The east elevation of the enclosed porch has two 6-over-1 double - hung windows and a three -paneled wood door with one upper light that accesses the basement. The east elevation of the rear addition has a small, flat -roofed, open porch supported by two wood posts with a concrete deck and a wood balustrade. The porch roof extends to the north to shelter the basement door. The side door (accessed by the porch) is wood paneled with three horizontal lights and has a wood screen door. There are two 1-over-1 double -hung windows to the south of the door. The south elevation (addition) has a pair of picture windows flanked by narrow 1-over-1 double hung windows. The front yard is grass lawn with foundation plantings. A chain -link fence extends across the rear of the yard (approximately 2/3 down the lot) and a cedar wood fence is along the west property line of the house. A wire fence is along the east property line. In addition to the residence, there are two associated, buildings on the property. The first, a contributing 14' x 22' single car garage faces the alley at the rear of the property. The low-pitched, gable -roofed garage has composition roof shingles and white, vinyl -coated aluminum alloy siding siding. The original wooden lap siding was replaced in 1993 when the siding on the home's addition was changed.'There is a wood overhead garage door on the south elevation and a wood -paneled entry door with one upper light on the east elevation. According to the 1954 Annual Assessment on the 1948 Tax Assessor record, the garage was built in 1954 and is typical of garages of the era. The garage is similar in style to other detached single car garages in the neighborhood, and contributes to the feeling of a historic residence, despite a loss of historic materials. The second, a non- contributing 8' x 10' metal modern utility building is set adjacent to the garage. REFERENCE LIST or SOURCES of INFORMATION (attach a separate sheet if needed) "A Season of Great Prosperity for Fort Collins Home Builders," Weekly Courier, December 27, 1905. Accessed June 7, 2018. https://www.coloradohistoricnewspapers.org/cgi- bi n/colorado?a=d&d=TWC19051227.2.11&srpos=6&e=-------en-20--1-byDA-txt-txl N- 22Roy+Portner% 22-------2-. Allbrandt, Barbara. "A Fort Collins Resident since'02, Portner is 88 and Still Going Strong," ' Shelly Terry, e-mail message to Kylee Cole, June 12, 2018. $ Shelly Terry, e-mail message to Kylee Cole, June 18, 2018. a 0 cu U Q a a 0 .y a� �a E �a J m E U M El Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 118 4.a Coloradoan, Mar. 3, 1974. Ahlbrandt, Arlene and Kate Stieben. "Dixon Family." In Lorimer County History: 1860s-1987, Vol. 11, edited by Andrew J. Morris, 654. Dallas, TX: Curtis Media Corp., ca. 1985-1987. City of Fort Collins Building Permit, 1936. Fort Collins History Connection. Accessed June 7, 2018. http://database.history.fcgov.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/bp/id/5338/rec/6. City of Fort Collins Building Permit, 1947. Fort Collins History Connection. Accessed June 7, 2018. http://database.history.fcgov.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/bp/id/l1036/rec/5. City of Fort Collins Building Records, 1905. Fort Collins History Connection. Accessed June 7, 2018. http://database.history.fcgov.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/br/id/3055/rec/25. City of Fort Collins City Directories, 1910-11, 1929, 1931. Accessed from Fort Collins History Connection. Find a Grave Website, "Grandview Cemetery Memorials." Find a Grave. Accessed June 6, 2018. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gsr&GSln=Dixon&GSiman=l&GScid=57312&. Historic Tax Assessor Photos, 1948, 1968. Accessed from Fort Collins History Connection. Humstone, et al. Loomis Addition Historic Context. Fort Collins, CO: Humstone Consulting, 2015. Larimer County Assessor Records. Massey, Rheba. Loomis Addition Historic Resource Survey: Architectural Inventory Form 817 W. Mountain, 2016. Obituary, Roy A. Portner. The Denver Post, Dec. 19, 1976. "Roy A. Portner." Historical Encyclopedia of Colorado, Vol. 1, revised Ed. 1964, p. 429. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, 1906, 1909, 1918. Accessed from University of Colorado Boulder: Sanborn Fire Insurance Map Collection. Accessed June 7, 2018. https://cudl.colorado.edu/luna/servlet/view/all/where/Fort%2BCollins/?&sort=city,date,sheet. a 0 U Q a a 0 .y N Y i E J C d E t V El Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 119 4.a Photographs Figure 1: East elevation and north fagade. Photo by Humstone Consulting. Figure 2: North and west elevations. Photo by Humstone Consulting. El Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 120 4.a Figure 3: Detail of arched window opening with radiating brick voussoirs. Photo by Kylee Cole Figure 4: West elevation. Photo by Kylee Cole. Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 121 4.a Figure 5: Details of the front gable featuring fish scale shingles and the original square, 6-light stationary window. Photo by Kylee Cole. Figure 6: Vinyl window and sandstone lug sill on fagade. Photo by Cassandra Bumgarner. El Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 122 4.a J Figure 7: Detail of brick coursing on the fagade. This continues around the brick portion of the residence. Photo by Cassandra Bumgarner. ir0110"' IF A Figure 8: Fagade with front porch. Photo by Cassandra Bumgarner. El Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 123 4.a Figure 9: East elevation windows in the original brick portion of the home. Note the original wooden windows underneath the exterior aluminum storm windows. Photo by Cassandra Bumgarner. Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 124 4.a f N Figure 10: Vinyl -frame window on the west elevation. Photo by Cassandra Bumgarner. El Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 125 4.a N Figure 11: Vinyl frame window on the eastern elevation. Photo by Cassandra Bumgarner. N O ti v a 0 ca U Q a a 0 �a c a� .y N Y i C J C d t V El Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 126 Figure 12: Southern -most windows on the west elevation. Both original. Photo by Cassandra Bumgarner. F I Figure 13: Southern -most window on the west elevation. Original wooden window which opens at the top like a transom. Covered with original exterior storm window. Photo by Cassandra Bumgarner. El Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 127 4.a Figure 14: West elevation original 1-over-1 window. Photo by Cassandra Bumgarner. a 0 U Q a a 0 .y N Y i E J C d E t V El Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 128 4.a qq 0 imc I Figure 15: Interior of the addition facing the original brick structure. The original doorway and brickwork remain Photo by Cassandra Bumgarner. Figure 16: East elevation, enclosed porch. Photo by Humstone Consulting. Revised 08-2014 Packet Pg. 129 i ,ny 3 T .r xw_ 1 PI S - 1 w I mc m r� 04 it k r .^ -, e did fit add Idddd'ic' - - ♦ :., •Mom• y!� :. ..,-w1 dr cv v 44 . t All It if `,� T-qi;p� U t kv, � kip 11 flow soql� Or ff If. VIP Ail 0 _ •rlx - _:T�' tom..• ^ _ iIL :Odqf IT AL I 4.a 817 West Mountain AGREEMENT The undersigned owner(s) hereby agrees that the property described herein be considered for local historic landmark designation, pursuant to the Fort Collins Landmark Preservation Ordinance, Chapter 14 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins. I understand that upon designation, I or my successors will be requested to notify the Secretary of the Landmark Preservation Commission at the City of Fort Collins prior to the occurrence of any of the following: Preparation of plans for reconstruction or alteration of the exterior of the improvements on the property, or; Preparation of plans for construction of, addition to, or demolition of improvements on the property DATED this ( day of 201 o Owner Name (please Owner Siknature State of C'J. 0'j C \ County of.lz 6 ) )ss. Subscribed and sworn before me thisly day of 2011, Witness my My commission expires 01" v� ?400 \ Notary RACHEL SESEL Notary Public State of Colorado Notary ID # 20174000633 El Packet Pg. 133 �.��.�.,; .irWT e Fir..,- `0 I; r 1 44-7 Fullana Elementary Elementary ILL w qw, 60 Air , Jlik,� f �, y 1 I •�.y. q j ��yy-I \" �.�' �. Y��. �L �".I I�\r .. r � �/� 1 '' '. .1 p$a. �`' � `.: -i III+++ /� t.. &,t'a� ;� �6@T: /' ��- j • : _ - �. - i �_. �yc , jr • Vf a e [ RP _1 I At 0 '1��; I 1 I<� o _W� .macr „� AAA, a t �M r },tS aar.' r A. IAW A T 77 �r RIM 1 y' rrr 11 �y 11 y Kylee Cole, Historic Preservation Intern City of Landmark Preservation Commission 08.18.2018 Fort Collins city o� • ' �.-•.r. =; �. �7 rns Application for Fort Collins Landmark Designation — Trimble/Taylor/Dixon Property 817 W. Mountain— Trimble/Taylor/Dixon Property L 4.c City of Fort Collins r 1 2016 City of FortCollins e r 1968, tax assessor photograph ZI Packet Pg. 136 4.c City of Fort Collins 2016 City of FortCollins e 1948, tax assessor photograph 11 T N O ti Packet Pg. 137 4.c City of Fort Collins City of FOrtCollins �` N %Rft T N O ti Packet Pg. 138 4.c City of Fort Collins Garage (1954), contributing (left); utility shed, non-contributing (right) City of FOrtCollins �` Garage, south elevation • Constructed in 1905, rear addition prior to 1948 • Standard C: Design/Construction — Classic Cottage, the most prevalent house form in the Loomis Addition • Exterior Integrity: Location, Setting, Design, Materials, Workmanship, o Feeling, and Association Packet Pg. 139 4.c City of FOrtCottins �` Chapter 14, Article 11 of the Municipal Code, "Designation Procedures: " • Determine if property meets the criteria of a Fort Collins landmark • Must possess both significance and exterior integrity • Context of the area surrounding the property shall be considered Sec. 14-22(a): If all owners consent in writing, and a majority of Commission approves: • Commission may adopt a resolution recommending to the City Council the designation T N O ti C 0 Cn L a rm E El Packet Pg. 140 City of Fort Collins i� Kylee Cole, Historic Preservation Intern Landmark Preservation Commission 08.18.2018 city 01 - wort Col�1n�, `, n M � Application for Fort Collins Landmark Designation — Trimble/Taylor/Dixon Property Agenda Item 5 PROJECT NAME REVIEW OF NOMINATION OF THE PATTERSON HOUSE, 121 NORTH GRANT AVENUE, FOR LISTING TO THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES STAFF Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In accordance with Certified Local Government (CLG) regulations, the Mayor and the Landmark Preservation Commission are asked to provide the Colorado Historic Preservation Review Board with comments on nominations to the National Register of Historic Places. At its September 21, 2018 meeting, the Review Board will discuss the nomination of the Patterson House, 121 North Grant Avenue, for listing to the National Register of Historic Places and the Colorado State Register of Historic Properties. APPLICANT: Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Manager OWNER: Susan Hoskinson RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission provide comments in support of the listing of this property to the National Register of Historic Places. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HISTORY: The Patterson House received recognition as a Fort Collins Landmark on June 5, 2018. In addition to its outstanding architecture, the Patterson House is one of the oldest homes in the Loomis Addition. It was constructed in 1887 as a show home, to entice people to buy lots in the Loomis Addition. Those that purchased lots were entered into a drawing for a chance to win the home. This is also the earliest documented pattern -book home in Fort Collins. The one -and -a -half -story, brick, Eastlake -style house was designed based on plans in a pattern book published by William T. Comstock in 1881. COMMISSION'S ACTION: At its hearing, and following public comment, the Commission shall prepare a report as to whether the Patterson House, 121 North Grant Avenue, in its opinion, meets the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places. REVIEW CRITERIA: The Criteria for Evaluation for listing on the National Register of Historic Places are: The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and: A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or Item # 5 Page 1 Packet Pg. 142 Agenda Item 5 B. That are associated with the lives of significant persons in or past; or C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. That have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. MOTION: Following its review, the Commission should adopt a motion as to whether the Patterson House meets the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places, and direct staff to prepare a report to this effect for submittal to the Colorado Historic Preservation Review Board. ATTACHMENTS 1. National Register Nomination (PDF) 2. CLG Request for Comments (PDF) 3. ORDINANCE_NUMBER_068_JUN-05-2018 (PDF) Item # 5 Page 2 Packet Pg. 143 NPS Forth 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior 5.a National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter 'N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Patterson House Other names/site number: McMillen -Patterson House 5LR.740 Name of related multiple property listing: N/A (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing 2. Location Street & number: 121 N. Grant Ave. City or town: Fort Collins State: CO County: Larimer Not For Publication: ❑ Vicinity: ❑ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ._ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60, In my opinion, the property _X_ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: _national _statewide X local Applicable National Register Criteria: _A _B X C _D Signature of State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting official: Title 1 Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government H W O z TMM TOM ui to Mn z O to W w FM INME a w LL z O FM Q z O z W w FM W a w tY J a z O FM z LL w w N TOM ti zo Packet Pg. 144 National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 5.a 4h Patterson House Name of Property 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that this property is: entered in the National Register determined eligible for the National Register _ determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain:) Signature of the Keeper 5. Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply.) Private: F] Public — Local Public — State Public — Federal Category of Property (Check only one box.) Building(s) 7 District Site F1 Structure F1 Object F1 Sections 1-6 page 2 Larimer Co, Colorado County and State Date of Action 2 H W O z TMM TOM fn Mn z O w FM a a w F- UL O z O FM Q z O z w FM w J z O FM z LL O w w N TOM ti 0 E 0 z as v, a� 0 �a z a� E �a ., Packet Pg. 145 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously listed resources in the count) Contributing 1 1 Noncontributing 1 1 Ladmer Co, Colorado County and State buildings sites structures objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register 0 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) DOMESTIC/Single Dwelling Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) DOMESTIC/Single Dwelling 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions.) LATE VICTORIAN/Stick/Eastlake Materials: (enter categories from instructions.) Principal exterior materials of the property: BRICK; WOOD/Shingle; STONE/Sandstone Section 7 page 3 2 FM IX O z TMM TOM ui Cn O z O Cn IX w FM FM a w u_ O z O FM Q z O z w I— Cn a w J a z O FM Q z u_ O w w N TOM ti zo Packet Pg. 146 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Fonn 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 2 Patterson House Larimer Co, Colorado ~ IX Name of Property County and State 0 Z TMM Narrative Description TOM (Describe the historic and current physical appearance and condition of the property. Describe L contributing and noncontributing resources if applicable. Begin with a summary paragraph that briefly describes the general characteristics of the property, such as its location, type, style, _ method of construction, setting, size, and significant features. Indicate whether the property has Z 0 historic integrity.) y w Summary Paragraph Q a The Patterson House is located in the middle of a block of houses dating from the 1890s through the 1910s in the Loomis Addition, one of the oldest residential subdivisions in Fort Collins, um Colorado. The neighborhood is aligned on a grid of wide, paved streets lined with mature Z deciduous trees in a 12'-wide tree strip, including cottonwood, apple, maple, oak, locust, walnut, 0 FM and chestnut. Lot sizes vary by block but are generally 40' wide by 180' deep, with houses generally set near the front of the lot and long, narrow backyards. The northernmost blocks of the Z Loomis Addition, including the block containing the Patterson House, are larger than the typical Z blocks in the neighborhood with alleys running both east -west and north -south.' The Patterson House is accessed at the rear by a north -south alley that connects with the two east -west alleys. Cn a The east -facing house is set back 7 F from the street behind a front lawn that stretches from lot line to lot line and from the sidewalk to the house. Plantings are limited to two oak trees in the Q tree strip and small shrubs and perennials close to the house. The house was designed based on Z plans in a pattern book published by William T. Comstock in 1881.2 The one -and -a -half -story, brick, Eastlake -style house is set on a sandstone foundation. The asymmetrical house has a z steeply pitched front gable roof intersected by two cross gables. Gable ends are finished in um various patterns of wood shingles and are finely decorated with details such as repetitive coffered 0 blocks, dentil rows, stylized sunburst and shell patterns, and bull's eyes. To the rear (west) of the W house is a non-contributing, gable -roof garage finished in wood lap siding with asphalt roofing. The house is in excellent condition and has a high degree of historic integrity. N TOM ti C O Narrative Description E The nominated area, a .21-acre city lot, includes the house and the rear garage (non- O Z contributing). A concrete walkway leads from the public sidewalk to the front porch, and around the south side of the house back to the garage and alley. The front lawn is not fenced, but the rear y of the lot is shielded from public view by cedar privacy fences extending from the north and IX 7a ' Lot 16, containing the Patterson House, was originally 50' x 190'. o z William T. Comstock, Modern Architectural Designs and Details, reprinted as Victorian Domestic Architectural a Plans and Details (New York: Architectural Publisher, 1881; New York: Dover Publications, 1987), Plates 73-75. Z Plate 73 was used in advertisements for the house in 1887. See Figures 1-5. While many details match those of Plate 73, the house as built is smaller and less elaborate than the house depicted in the publication. E U �a Section 7 page 4 Q Packet Pg. 147 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 2 Patterson House Larimer Co, Colorado IX FM Name of Property County and State O z TMM south sides of the house and enclosing the back yard west to the alley. Gates at the north and TOM south sides of the house access the rear of the lot, and a flagstone walk leads from the gate on the uJ Cn north side of the house to a non -historic wood deck behind the house. The garage at the rear of M the property is accessed from the alley by a gravel apron. _ z O The house itself was constructed in three parts, which are described separately below. The Cn original house, built in 1887, received a small rear addition and back porch ca. 1905, and a side FM (south) porch ca. 1920. In 1978, the south porch was removed, the rear addition was expanded Q with a partial second story and the back porch was replaced with a second addition to the rear. w The house has a complex roofline consisting of a total of six gable ends, two east -west and four um north -south. The steeply pitched, cross -gabled roof is sheathed with wood shingles and has metal z ridge caps that terminate with ball finials at each of the gable ends. The three main gables of the 0 original part of the house are all similar in design and terminate in a fish -scale shingled "skirt" z which forms a slight overhang above the first story. There is a partially finished basement. O z House, 1887, Contributing, Photos 1=17 W The 18' x 37' one -and -a -half -story, Eastlake -style brick house constructed in 1887 has an y asymmetrical east -facing facade with two bays (Photo 1). The brick is laid in stretcher bond. The a brick was painted white prior to 1967; it is now painted to match the color of the original brick. W The foundation is coursed cut sandstone with one course of rock -faced sandstone visible at grade J a topped by one course of sandstone with bush -hammered detailing, with the exception of a small z portion of the north foundation, described below. Windows are original (1887) wood one -over- FM one double -hung or small stationary sash and have brick flat -arch tops with radiating voussoirs z and sandstone lugsills with bush -hammered detailing unless otherwise noted. Most windows also um have exterior wood storm and screen windows. W The main portion of the facade under the front -facing gable has a central, squared off, shallow W IX projecting bay on the first story with two one -over -one double -hung windows (Photo 4). A single stone lug sill extends the length of the bay. The front gable has vergeboards which terminate in c wood returns carved in a shell pattern. A set of three one -over -one double -hung windows with decorative wood surrounds and a center ogee over each window is centered in the gable end. c Below the windows is a wood balconet with a finial at each end of a low, turned balustrade. Above the windows is Eastlake detailing consisting of fish -scale shingles surrounding a central E rectangular frame with eight square coffers above a row of wood dentils topped by a projecting z° molding. Staggered rectangular shingles which wrap around the sides of the gable framed by wood cornerboards sheath the lower half of the gable end with a projecting, rounded wood molding marking the transition from the upper gable to the "skirt." A wood cornice marks the transition between the skirt and the brick wall. 0 In the southeast corner of the facade is a semi -enclosed, one-story porch slightly set back from z the projecting front bay of the house and sheltered by an extension of the main gable roof (Photo c 5). The east -facing porch entry is arched and supported by square brick columns with corbelled W capitals. A similar arched opening with a low knee wall with staggered brick detailing topped by �a a Section 7 page 5 Packet Pg. 148 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Fonn 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 2 Patterson House Larimer Co, Colorado ~ Name of Property County and State O Z TMM a sandstone cap is on the south side of the porch. The arches are elliptical with radiating TOM voussoirs with decorative wrought -iron semi -elliptical inserts. Above the front arch the roof L forms a pediment, which contains a decorative wood panel topped by a sunburst motif. The o porch deck is redwood and the steps are sandstone. The original front door is oak with one = rectangular wood panel above a large glass light and four square wood panels below (Photo 6). Z O There is also a wood storm door (1967). Cn W I — The south side of the original house has a three -sided cutaway bay topped by an overhanging Q front -gable roof supported by scrolled brackets with an incised pattern (Photo 7). There is a small a W stationary -sash window in the center bay, a matching opening in -filled with staggered brickwork = in the west bay, and a double -hung window in the east bay. To each side of the bay is a small um stationary window. The south -facing gable end has most of the same features as the front gable. Z The vergeboards have a decorative bull's eye design at each end. The surface of the gable end is 0 sheathed with seven rows of hexagonal shingles above a row of wood dentils topped by a z projecting wood molding. Below the dentils are two small, double -hung windows with decorative wood surrounds, separated by a set of 15 wood coffers. Under the windows is a sill 0 Z molding. This portion of the gable end features wood comerboards and is sheathed with W staggered rectangular shingles on the south, east and west sides. A projecting, rounded wood y molding marks the transition from the upper gable to the fish -scale -shingled skirt, and a wood a cornice marks the transition between the skirt and the brick wall. Two decorative corner brackets W support the skirt above the cutaway bay. a Z Continuing west on the south side there is a five -panel wood door with one glass light and a IMM wood storm door (1967) with four horizontal lights above two narrow wood panels. The original Z plan (as shown in Comstock's 1881 pattern book) shows a small window near where the door is, um and a brick voussoir several inches above the door suggests that there might have originally been a window in this location. A short row of slightly protruding bricks extends from near the top of W the door frame west to what was originally the southwest corner of the house. A similar protruding brick course extends lower down from the east side of the door to the lug sill under the stationary window, and on to the western edge of the bay. A narrow wood deck with a square c wood balustrade, completed in 2017, runs from the south -side door to a larger deck at the rear of the house (Photo 8). Steps access the deck at the location of the door. A wood privacy fence c located west of the canted bay screens the deck from public view. c E The north side has a slightly projecting squared -off bay on the first story with two double -hung Z windows (Photo 12). A single double -hung window is located to the west of the bay on the first 4) story. The foundation west of the bay is formed by rock -faced sandstone blocks. The north- y facing gable above the bay has most of the same features as the south gable (Photo 13). The vergeboards have a decorative bull's eye design on each end, with a decorative wood shell design at the apex. The top of the gable end is sheathed with five rows of hexagonal shingles. o Below is a pair of double -hung windows with wood surrounds and a projecting cornice molding. z The remainder of the gable f cornerboards and is sheathed with staggered rectangular shingles. A brick chimney with a corbelled top rises from the east slope of the gable. �a Section 7 page 6 Q Packet Pg. 149 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 2 Patterson House Larimer Co, Colorado w Name of Property County and State Z T The interior of the original portion of the house contains many Eastlake features such as r hardware (hinges, doorknobs, window sash locks) stamped with stylized decorative patterns, L wide window and door moldings with bull's eye blocks in the corners, and a curved stair balustrade with turned balusters and an incised and turned newel post (Photo 16). The front door = opens into a small entry with an arched opening. The stairway rises to the left in a gentle curve. p co To the right (comprising the front bay) is a small parlor. A dining room and kitchen complete the first floor of the original house. Upstairs are three small bedrooms. a Additions (Photos 8-11, 14-15) a w Although the original portion of the Patterson House is basically unchanged since its construction, the rear of the house has undergone several additions and changes. um z Addition #1 (ca. 1905): The first addition to the house was added prior to 1906, as illustrated by 0 the 1906 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company map (Figure 6).3 The 18' x 11' one-story, brick z addition was added to the rear (west) side of the house (Photos 8, 14-15). On both the north and south walls, the edges of the addition are clearly delineated by thin vertical lines in the bricks. It z has a rock -faced sandstone foundation and originally had a slightly sloping flat roof. Originally, W there were no windows on the south or north sides; two large windows on the west (rear) side co opened onto a 7' x 16' wood -frame back porch.4 In 1978, two one -over -one wood windows with plain wood surrounds and two -light removeable wood storm windows were added to the north and south sides. On the north side, a small double -hung basement window is set inside a stone- J a lined window well. The two basement windows on the south side are obscured by a wood deck Z constructed in 2017. Q z Addition #2 (ca. 1917-25): A 14' x 8' frame porch was added to the south side of the house just um west of the bay between 1917 and 1925. The porch is not documented in the 1917 Sanborn map, but does appear in the 1925 map (Figure 7) and 1948 assessor photo (Figure 8). It was removed w by the current owner in 196V w Addition #3 (1978): In 1978, the current owner removed the ca. 1906 wood -frame back porch o and replaced it with a two-story, 18' x 10.5' addition. At this time a second story was added to ~ the ca. 1905 addition, with a cross -gable roof extending from the original 1887 roof to the rear o wall of the 1978 addition (see Sketch Map). The 1978 remodeling/addition project was designed by Dave Dobkins, son-in-law of local architect William Robb.6 E 0 z Both the south and north -facing cross -gable ends over the ca. 1905 addition have two double- hung windows with eight rows of hexagonal shingles above the window and rows of staggered N rectangular shingles below, terminating in a wood molding and skirt matching those of the �a s 1906 is the earliest Sanborn map to include Block 291. The addition was likely built between 1904 and 1906 by the o third owner of the house, Robert Ferguson, who purchased the property in 1900 and had several liens against the a property in 1904. There is no building permit record of this addition. Z 4 Interview with owner, Susan Hoskinson, (date to come). s Ibid. E 6 Ibid. The 1978 plans are in the current owner's possession. Section 7 page 7 Q Packet Pg. 150 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Ladmer Co, Colorado Name of Property County and State original gables (Photos 9 and 14). The one -over -one wood windows have plain wood surrounds and two -light removeable wood storm windows. The two-story 1978 addition is frame construction faced with brick and has a concrete foundation and a front -gable roof. The bricks were salvaged by the owners from a gas station that was being demolished at the comer of Jefferson Street and College Avenue in Fort Collins.' The north and south sides have no windows (Photos 8, 10, 15). The east edge of the addition is clearly delineated by a thin vertical gap between the ca. 1905 and 1978 walls and a change in foundation materials from sandstone to poured concrete. Wood trim is located at the top of the brick walls and above the shingled skirt. The first story of the west side has four double -hung windows with brick lug sills and two -light removeable wood storm windows, and a five -panel wood door with one light and a wood storm door (Photo 11). A pair of double -hung windows with plain wood surrounds and two -light removeable wood storm windows is centered in the gable end. There are seven rows of hexagonal shingles above the windows and staggered rectangular shingles on the lower part of the gable end terminating in a wood molding and skirt matching those of the other gable ends. The south side of the addition has a brick and wood - shingled exterior chimney. Deck (2017): A wide wood deck with a wood balustrade on its north and south sides, a log bench on its west side and two steps at the northwest and southwest corners extends from the west wall of the 1978 addition and wraps around the rear portion of the south side of the house (Photos 8 and 11). Garage,1990, Non-contributing, Photos 18-20 A 26' x 20', one -and -a -half -story, one -car garage was built to the west of the house in 1990 to replace an older garage built in 1924 and demolished in the early 1980s. The rectangular plan garage has wood lap siding and an asphalt -shingled roof with metal ridge cap and ball finials matching those of the house. The roof has an intersecting central gable on the east side. The east side is symmetrical, with a central 4-panel wood door with a single upper light flanked by pairs of double -hung windows. A small double -hung window is centered in the gable end. The north side has one double -hung window on the upper story and the south side has a double -hung window on both stories. The west side has a single garage door offset to the south. Statement of Historic Integrity The Patterson House retains historic integrity in all seven aspects. The house retains its original location and setting on a block that has not been impacted by new construction. The immediately adjacent properties were constructed prior to 1910, and all properties on the block were constructed prior to 1920, making the block a candidate for a local historic district along with three blocks of Mountain Avenue to the south.' The 1887 house retains its original materials and workmanship in the stone foundation, brick walls, original wood windows, gable end wall ' Ibid. 8 Humstone et al, Loomis Addition Survey Report, prepared for the City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Program, November 2017, 33. Section 7 page 8 2 FM O z TOM ui Cn Mn O z O Cn w FM FM a a w u- O z O FM z O z w I- w J a z O FM Q z u- O w w tY N TOM ti El Packet Pg. 151 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 2 Patterson House Larimer Co, Colorado W Name of Property County and State O z TMM treatments and decorative features. Integrity of design is minimally impacted by the two rear TOM additions, which increased the footprint from 18' x 37' to 18' x 58.5'. The first addition was built ui to relatively early (ca. 1905) and matched the 1887 house in wall height and material. The second story and rear addition, added in 1978, are compatible in design, material, and workmanship with = but not identical to the earlier portions of the house, with a slightly lower roof line. The two p additions are differentiated from the 1887 construction by breaks in the brickwork and changes Cn W in the foundation material. The two gable ends of the second story addition are simpler than the FM 1887 gable ends, with similar shingling but without coffers or dentils. The house retains the FM feeling and association of the late 1880s when the Loomis Addition was platted, w u_ O z O FM Q z O z W w FM U) w J a z O FM Q z u_ O w w N TOM ti Section 7 page 9 El Packet Pg. 152 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property 8. Statement of Significance Larimer Co, Colorado County and State Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National Register listing.) ❑ A. Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. B. Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. X C. Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. D. Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) A. Owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes B. Removed from its original location C. A birthplace or grave D. A cemetery ❑ E. A reconstructed building, object, or structure F. A commemorative property G. Less than 50 years old or achieving significance within the past 50 years Section 8 page 10 2 H W O z TMM TOM Cl) Mn O z O W w FM FM a w u_ O z O FM z O z w FM U) w J a z O FM Q z u_ O w w N TOM ti 0 0 z as a� �a z a� E �a El Packet Pg. 153 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions.) ARCHITECTURE Period of Significance 1887 - ca. 1905 Significant Dates 1887 ca. 1905 Significant Person (Complete only if Criterion B is marked above.) Cultural Affiliation Architect/Builder Architect: Gould and Angell Builder: Herman W. Schroeder Section 8 page 11 Larimer Co, Colorado County and State 2 I— O z N TOM ui CI) M O z O w w I— a a w u_ O z O Q z O z w w J a z O i= Q z u_ O w w N TOM ti ZI Packet Pg. 154 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property Larimer Co, Colorado County and State Statement of Significance Summary Paragraph (Provide a summary paragraph that includes level of significance, applicable criteria, justification for the period of significance, and any applicable criteria considerations.) The Patterson House is locally significant under Criterion C in the area of Architecture. The period of significance begins when the house was constructed in 1887, and extends through ca. 1905 when the first addition was built to the rear. This residence was built as a show home to entice people to buy lots in the Loomis Addition.9 Its design was based on Plate 73 of William Comstock's Modern Architectural Designs and Details (1881), "Brick and Frame Cottage," designed by Gould and Angell, architects from Providence, Rhode Island (see Figures 1-3). According to former Fort Collins Archivist Rheba Massey, the Patterson House is the earliest documented pattern -book house in Fort Collins, and the only building in Fort Collins known to be based on designs by the architectural firm of Gould and Angell.10 Although not quite as elaborate as the plan it was based on, the Patterson House exhibits identifiable characteristics of the Eastlake style, a popular Victorian -era variation of the Queen Anne style, with its steeply pitched gable roof with multiple cross gables, restrained projections, boxy and cut -away bays, and repetitive decorative wood patterns especially in the gable ends and vergeboards. The house is the oldest remaining house in one of the earliest subdivisions (1887) in Fort Collins." In spite of multiple owners and the changes in living standards and conveniences in the 130 years since the house was built, the property still retains its historic character and architectural features. Narrative Statement of Significance (Provide at least one paragraph for each area of significance.) Built in 1887, the Patterson House is a good example of the Eastlake style, a popular late Victorian variation of the Queen Anne style, in which the decorative elements are flattened out so as to appear more angular and machine made. Features of the Eastlake style include repetitive, machine -made decorations in bead and belt -like patterns, as well as incised decorative elements especially in the gable ends. Eastlake houses also have delicate spindlework detailing on porch balustrades and/or valances, and cut -away corner windows, in which the window itself sits at a 45-degree angle to the walls and the wall area above is decorated with scroll -sawn wood. 9 This is well documented in newspaper articles and in advertisements placed by real estate agent George Darrow in the Fort Collins Courier, including May 26, 1887, June 9, 1887, and August 1, 1887. See Mary Humstone, et al, Loomis Addition Historic Context, prepared for the City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Program, February 2015, 19. 10 Rheba Massey served as the Fort Collins Archivist from 1993 to 2007 and conducted exhaustive research in newspapers and building records on Fort Collins architects, builders and pattern -book houses. Her research is archived in the Local History Archive, Fort Collins Museum of Discovery. 11 Mary Humstone, et al., Loomis Addition Survey Report, prepared for the City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Program, November 2017, Section 8 page 12 2 FM O z N TOM ui Cl) M O z O W w FM FM a a w LL O z O FM z z w I— U) w J a z O FM Q z LL O w w N TOM ti zo Packet Pg. 155 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property Larimer Co, Colorado County and State Although more restrained than some examples, the Patterson House exhibits typical Eastlake form in its steeply pitched, cross -gabled roofs and its squared -off and cut -away bays. Eastlake details include use of various -shaped wood shingles; balustrades with turned spindles; decorated vergeboards, brackets and gable ends; corbelled capitals and chimney tops; staggered brick detailing; and decorative motifs such as stylized shells, sunbursts and bull's eyes; dentils; and repetitive rows of square coffers. It is one of the few remaining Eastlake -style houses in Fort Collins and the only Eastlake -style house in the Loomis Addition.12 Construction of the Patterson House The house at 121 North Grant Avenue was the first house built after the Loomis Addition was platted in 1887. The Loomis Addition was developed by and named after Abner Loomis, one of Fort Collins' early and prominent developers and businessmen. At the time that it was platted, the subdivision was surrounded by open lands to the west and south, and only sparse development to the north and east. The neighborhood developed slowly, with only 35 houses built by 1900. However, in the first two decades of the twentieth century, the Loomis Addition, along with all of Fort Collins, experienced a growth spurt. With two major rail lines, expansion of Colorado Agricultural College (later known as Colorado State University), construction of a sugar beet factory and the introduction of streetcars, Fort Collins became an agricultural and transportation hub. The city's population almost tripled from about 3,000 in 1900 to 8,755 by 1920.13 The house, which was constructed on lot 16 of the Loomis Addition between June 1887 and May 1888, was built and advertised as a show home to be given away in a drawing, in order to entice people to buy lots in the Loomis Addition. Those purchasing lots (offered for $75 and up) were eligible for a chance to win the home.14 The sketch of the house used in advertisements and posters was taken directly from the 1881 edition of William Comstock Is Modern Architectural Designs and Details (Plate 73). The design was credited to Gould and Angell, architects from Providence, Rhode Island. 16 The house and lot were valued at $3000.17 Denver real estate broker George G. Darrow, agent for owner and developer Abner Loomis, received the building permit for the house in 1887. The builder was Herman W. 12 Reba Massey for Humstone Consulting, Colorado Cultural Resource Survey, Architectural Inventory Form for 121 N. Grant Avenue. City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Program, 2016. 13 Humstone, et al., Loomis Addition Survey Report, 5. 14 See Figures 4 and 5.This is well documented in newspaper articles and in advertisements placed by real estate agent George Darrow in the Fort Collins Courier, including May 26, 1887, June 9, 1887, and August 1, 1887. For more information see Mary Humstone, et al., Loomis Addition Historic Context, 19. 16 Comstock, 73. The complete name of the book is Modern Architectural Designs and Details, Containing Eighty Finely Lithographed Plates, Showing New and Original Designs in the Queen Anne, Eastlake, Elizabethan and other Modernized Styles. •17 Humstone, et al., Loomis Addition Historic Context, 19, Section 8 page 13 2 FM O Z N TOM ui Cl) M O Z O W w FM FM a w LL O Z O FM Q Z 0 Z w 1— w J a Z O FM Q Z u_ O w w N TOM ti 0 E 0 Z L m 0 1a Z m E 1a ZI Packet Pg. 156 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property Larimer Co, Colorado County and State Schroeder, who is listed as the builder in an 1887 newspaper article.'8 Schroeder's name was scrawled in black paint on a rough board tacked above the kitchen door.19 A comparison of Plate 73 in Modern Architectural Designs and Details and the house as built indicates that the builder of the Patterson House used the Gould and Angell design as a model but did not follow the plans exactly. The house as built is significantly smaller (one -and -a -half stories instead of two stories and with a smaller footprint). The interior of the house is very similar to the plan, but with smaller rooms, the hall and dining room combined, and the staircase moved forward. The front bay and gable, front porch, and the cutaway bay on the south side, as well as the window and door patterns and decorative details are taken directly from the Gould and Angell design. Rhode Island natives Thomas J. Gould and Frank W. Angell trained in the office of builder/architect Gen. William R. Walker before forming a successful partnership in 1881. The firm appears to have specialized in residential design and their designs were published in a number of pattern books and trade magazines between 1881 and 1890. The homes designed by Gould & Angell reflected the popularity of the Queen Anne and Shingle style in the northeastern United States during the 1880s and 90s. The firm produced some non-residential work as well and the Shingle style Oddfellow's Hall they designed in 1889 is listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRIS.80000004, 1980). In 1893, Frank H. Swift joined the partnership, afterward known as Gould, Angell & Swift. Gould left the firm in 1897, practicing alone or in partnership with others until 1919. Angell and Swift continued to work together until Swift's death in 1934. Angell formally closed his office in 1935 but took on occasional commissions, working from his Rhode Island home.20 Early owners When 200 lots within the Loomis addition had been sold, George Darrow held a drawing in the old Fort Collins Opera House. The house was won by J.M. Fillebrown of Geneva, Nebraska, on Friday, May 11, 1888.21 Fillebrown sold the house to Alice Patterson (wife of Arthur H. "Billy" Patterson) on August 10, 1888, for $1200. Arthur died in 1892, but the Patterson family continued to own the house until 1900. Arthur Patterson had been a close friend of William H. `Buffalo Bill" Cody. The two of them met in Leavenworth, Kansas, and traveled to New Mexico together at the ages of 18 (Patterson) and 16 (Cody). Patterson headed north from New Mexico to Colorado where 18 Fort Collins Courier, June 23, 1887, 1. 19 This was found by the owner during interior renovation work in 2016. Herman W. Schroeder is also listed in the property abstract as having a mechanic's lien on the house. 20 Jan Jennings, Cheap and Tastefid Dwellings: Design Competitions and the Convenient Interior, 1879-1909 (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 2005), 81, 209-10, 224-5. Source includes lists of Gould and Angell's known work. 21 Fort Collins Courier, May 17, 1888. Section 8 page 14 2 H W O Z T N T ui O Z O CO W w a w u_ O Z O FM z O Z w FM CO 0 w W J a Z O Q Z u_ O w w N T 0 ti v 0 c E 0 Z a� a� 7a c 0 ca Z c m E U ffs 1 Packet Pg. 157 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 2 Patterson House Larimer Co, Colorado FM tY Name of Property County and State O z TMM 04 he established a livery and freighting business in Fort Collins by 1866. Cody returned to TOM Leavenworth where he and Patterson had met. The two remained in contact afterward and L Cody occasionally visited Patterson in Fort Collins during the late nineteenth century. o The Fort Collins Express of December 10, 1892, notes that, "Hon W.F. Cody, otherwise = known as `Buffalo Bill' is in our city on a brief visit with Wm. Patterson." Patterson died z later that month, and his obituary also mentions the final visit from Cody. Cn w FM Patterson married Alice Watrous in December, 1873, and they lived at 211 Myrtle Street FM in Fort Collins before building a home in November 1879 on the corner of Remington a w and Olive. In 1879 Patterson donated 80 of the 240 acres that were given to the State of Colorado to form the nucleus of the campus of Colorado Agricultural College (now um Colorado State University). z O Ownership of the house,19004967 z 2 The property at 121 N. Grant went through many owners in the first six decades of the 0 z twentieth century. Robert M. Ferguson, the secretary at Collins Cash Clothing, purchased W the house from the Patterson family in 1900, and owned it until 1914. It is likely that y Ferguson built the rear addition and back porch prior to 1906. He also purchased lot 17, a directly to the south. From 1914 to 1924 there were 5 owners: Clyde and Addie Brown owned both lots 16 and 17 from 1914 to 1919. In 1919, they sold the lots separately, with lot 16 where the house is located going to Nellie A. Matteson. Kathryn Marshall was the z owner from 1920 to 1921, G.F. Wiard in 1921 and Mary Alice Aanes from 1921 to 1924. FM J.F. Kinney and Myrtelle Kinney owned the home from 1924 to 1945 and sold it to C. G. z Snelling in 1945." Myrtelle also conveyed the south two feet of lot 16 by warranty deed um to Emma Clammer of 119 N. Grant on November 9, 1945. This is likely due to the fact that Clammer had built an outbuilding over the lot line. w w tY Edward M. Holst Jr. and his wife Vivian purchased the home in 1946 and sold it to Emma P. Clammer in 1954. Martha Mae Trupp purchased the home in 1956 and sold it to c Edith Trupp the following year. The next owners, Harold and Sarah Hicks, purchased it in 1965, but went bankrupt in 1966. c 1967=present E 0 z Donald L. "Don" and Susan L. McMillen purchased the home from Fort Collins Federal Savings and Loan Association in 1967. They started a local weekly newspaper, the Triangle Review, in May 1973. They became very active in documenting the history of Fort Collins through their newspaper and Susan (now Hoskinson) has been a leader in preserving Fort Collins' history. Susan sold the newspaper in 1983 and it continued to be o published until 1995. Susan still resides in the home today. z a� E zz Also spelled "Myrtle." Section 8 page 15 Q Packet Pg. 158 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property Larimer Co, Colorado County and State When the McMillens purchased the property in 1967, they undertook major interior remodeling, as the house was uninhabitable. They added another 500 sq. ft. to the existing 1000 sq. ft. in 1978. The two-story addition was faced with bricks that the McMillens salvaged from a demolished gas station at North College Avenue and Jefferson Street in Fort Collins. Section 8 page 16 2 H w O z TMM TOM ui Cl) M O z O w w FM FM a a w LL O z O FM Q z O z W w FM w J a z O FM Q z LL O w w N TOM ti El Packet Pg. 159 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No, 1024-0018 FM Patterson House Larimer Co, Colorado Name of Property County and State Z TMM 9. Major Bibliographical References TOM ui Cn Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form.) o Abstract of Title, 121 N. Grant, Fort Collins, CO. In possession of owner. o Cn tY Colorado Historic Newspapers Collection. https://www.coloradohistoricnewspal)ers.org LU I — Comstock, William. T. Modern Architectural Designs and Details, Containing Eighty Finely a Lithographed Plates, Showing New and Original Designs in the Queen Anne, Eastlake, _ Elizabethan and other Modernized Styles. New York: William T. Comstock, um Architectural Publisher, 1881. Reprinted as Victorian Domestic Architectural Plans and O Details, New York: Dover Publications, 1987. p FM "Digital Sanborn Maps 1867-1970," Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2018. z 2 Humstone et al. Loomis Addition Historic Context. City of Fort Collins Historic Z Preservation Program, 2015. w I— Humstone et al. Loomis Addition Survey Report. City of Fort Collins Historic Cn a Preservation Program, 2017. W o` J Jennings, Jan. Cheap and Tasteful Dwellings: Design Competitions and the z Convenient Interior, 1879-1909. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 2005. 0 FM Q Massey, Rheba, for Humstone Consulting. Colorado Cultural Resource Survey, Z Architectural Inventory Form for 121 N. Grant Avenue. City of Fort Collins p Historic Preservation Program, 2016. w Swanson, Evadene Burris. Fort Collins Yesterdays. Fort Collins, CO: Don -Art Printers, 1975, N Tresner, Charlene. Streets of Fort Collins. Fort Collins, CO: Patterson House Book Publishing, 2007. c Watrous, Ansel. History of Larimer County Colorado. Fort Collins, CO: The Courier a Printing and Publishing Company, 1911. c Z L O cu Z f+ I_ <.i a Sections 9-end page 17 Packet Pg. 160 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Larimer Co, Colorado Name of Property County and State Previous documentation on file (NPS): preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested previously listed in the National Register previously determined eligible by the National Register designated a National Historic Landmark recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey # recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # recorded by Historic American Landscape Survey # _ Primary location of additional data: State Historic Preservation Office Other State agency Federal agency X Local government University Other Name of repository: City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Program Historic Resources Survey Number (if assigned): 5LR.740 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property less than one Datum (indicated on USGS map): F] NAD 1927 or MNAD 1983 1. Zone: 13 Easting: 492380 2. Zone: Easting: 3. Zone: Easting: 4. Zone: Easting : Northing: 4493031 Sections 9-end page 18 Northing: Northing: Northing: 2 FM O z TMM TOM Mn O z O w FM a a w F- LL O z O FM Q z z w FM U) a w J a z O FM Q z LL O w w N TOM ti 0 E 0 z L a� 0 �a z a� E �a El Packet Pg. 161 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Larimer Co, Colorado Name of Property County and State Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property.) The property (Latimer County parcel number 9711307016) occupies the north 48 ft of Lot 16, Block 291, Loomis Addition, Fort Collins, Colorado, Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected.) The boundary of the nomination encompasses the property historically associated with the house at 121 N. Grant, minus a 2' strip on the south boundary. 11. Form Prepared By name/title: Mary Humstone, Principal organization: Humstone Consulting street & number: 4420 Bingham Hill Rd city or town: Fort Collins state: CO zip code: 80521 e-mail_ humstone.consulting@gmail.com telephone: 970 420-5275 date: April 27, 2018 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: • Maps: A USGS map or equivalent (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. • Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Key all photographs to this map. • Additional items: (Check with the SHPO, TPO, or FPO for any additional items.) Sections 9-end page 19 ZI Packet Pg. 162 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 2 Patterson House Larimer Co, Colorado W Name of Property County and State O Z TMM Photographs TOM Submit clear and descriptive photographs. The size of each image must be 1600x1200 pixels Cn (minimum), 3000x2000 preferred, at 300 ppi (pixels per inch) or larger. Key all photographs = to the sketch map. Each photograph must be numbered and that number must correspond to Z the photograph number on the photo log. For simplicity, the name of the photographer, 0 CO photo date, etc. may be listed once on the photograph log and doesn't need to be labeled on w every photograph. FM a a Photo Log = Name of Property: Patterson House o Z O City or Vicinity: Fort Collins Q Z_ County: Larimer State: Colorado O Z Photographer: Rheba Massey unless otherwise noted w FM CO Date Photographed: 2016, unless otherwise noted w Description of Photograph(s) and number, include description of view indicating direction of z camera: O FM Q 1 of 19: CO Larimer County_ Patterson House _0001 Z u_ East fagade and south side, camera facing northwest O Photographer: Mary Humstone w 2 of 19: CO_Larimer County_ Patterson House_0002 East fagade, showing adjacent houses, camera facing west N Photographer: Mary Humstone Date of photograph: 2018 = O 3 of 19: CO Larimer County_ Patterson House_0003 East fagade and north side, camera facing southwest c Photographer: Mary Humstone Z L 4 of 19: CO—Larimer County_ Patterson House_0004 East fagade and south side, camera facing northwest 5 of 19: CO_Larimer County_ Patterson House_0005 I0= cu Detail of front porch, southeast corner, camera facing northwest; also showing sandstone Z foundation c a� �a Sections 9-end page 20 Q Packet Pg. 163 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property 6 of 19: CO_Larimer County_ Patterson House_0006 Front door, exterior, camera facing south 7 of 19: CO_Larimer County_ Patterson House_0007 South side, camera facing northwest 8 of 19: CO_Larimer County_ Patterson House_0008 Rear (west) end of south side, showing rear additions (pre-1948, Photographer: Mary Humstone Date of photograph: 2018 9 of 19: CO_Larimer County_ Patterson House_0009 Detail of gable end, west gable on south side (added in Photographer: Mary Humstone Date of photograph: 2018 10 of 19: CO_Larimer County_ Patterson House_0010 South side, camera facing northeast Photographer: Mary Humstone Date of photograph: 2018 11 of 19: CO_Larimer County_ Patterson House_0011 West side, camera facing east Photographer: Mary Humstone Date of photograph: 2018 Larimer Co, Colorado County and State 1978) and deck (2017) 1978), camera facing northeast 12 of 19: CO_Larimer County_ Patterson House_0012 East facade (left) and north side, camera facing southwest 13 of 19: CO_Larimer County_ Patterson House_0013 North side, camera facing southwest 14 of 19: CO_Larimer County_ Patterson House_0014 West (rear) end of north side, showing rear additions, camera facing southwest 15 of 19: CO_Larimer County_ Patterson House_0015 North side and flagstone walkway, garage in background. Ca. 1905 addition has two windows (added in 1978) and sandstone foundation; 1978 addition extending west has concrete foundation. Camera facing west. Photographer: Mary Humstone Date of photograph: 2018 Sections 9-end page 21 2 FM O z TOM ui Cl) Mn O z O W W FM FM a W u_ O z O FM z O z w I— U) a W J a z O FM Q z u_ O W W N TOM ti zo Packet Pg. 164 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property 16 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0016 Interior, detail of newell post Photographer: Mary Humstone Date of photograph: 2018 17 of 19: CO_Larimer County —Patterson House_0017 Garage, south (left) and east sides, camera facing northwest Photographer: Mary Humstone Date of photograph: 2018 18 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0018 Garage, south (left) and east sides, camera facing northwest Photographer: Mary Humstone Date of photograph: 2018 19 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0019 Garage, west side, camera facing east Photographer: Mary Humstone Date of photograph: 2018 List of Maps and Historic Figures Location Map Sketch Map Historic Figures 1 of 9, Plate 73, Modern Architectural Designs and Details (1881) "Brick and Frame Cottage," designed by Gould and Angell. 2 of 9, Plate 74, Modern Architectural Designs and Details (1881) "Brick and Frame Cottage," elevations. 3 of 9, Plate 75, Modern Architectural Designs and Details (1881) "Brick and Frame Cottage," details. Larimer Co, Colorado County and State 4 of 9, "Loomis Addition' advertisement Fort Collins Courier, June 9, 1887. Shows use of Plate 73 in advertisements for 121 N. Grant Avenue, Sections 9-end page 22 2 H W O z TMM TOM M O z O W w h FM a a w LL O z O FM z O z w h U) w J a z O FM Q z LL O w w N TOM ti 0 _ E 0 z L v, a� 0 �a z a� E �a El Packet Pg. 165 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property Larimer Co, Colorado County and State 5 of 9, Poster advertising Free Excursion to Fort Collins Includes a map of Fort Collins showing the location of the Loomis Addition, and Plate 73 with the caption, "The House and Full-sized Lot Valued at $3,000 Given Away. Denver Public Library. http://digital.denverlibrary.org/cdnVsingleitenVcollection/pl6079co1139/id/958/rec/1. 1 of 9: Detail from 1906 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map showing first addition. Digital Sanborn Maps, 1867-1970 online database, Denver Public Library. 2 of 9: Detail from 1925 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map showing second addition. Digital Sanborn Maps, 1867-1970 online database, Denver Public Library. 8 of 9, 121 N. Grant Avenue (Patterson House) East side, camera facing west. Photo taken by Larimer County Assessor, 1948. Shows house painted white, with ca. 1917-25 addition (south porch, demolished 1967) on south side and accessory building to the north (nonextant). Both are documented in the 1925 Sanborn map. Materials and details match house today. Original archived at Local History Archive, Fort Collins Museum of Discovery. Available online at http://database.history.fcgov.conVcdm/search/?collection=ph&searchterm=1.2 l+n+grant. 9 of 9, 121 N. Grant Avenue (Patterson House) South side (left) and east fagade, camera facing northwest. Photo taken by Larimer County Assessor, 1967. Shows brick portion of house painted white. Wall on south side west of bay is unclear, but might be the south porch shown in the 1948 photo. To the west is the wood back porch that was removed in 1978. Otherwise materials and details match house today. Original archived at Local History Archive, Fort Collins Museum of Discovery. Available online at http://database.histor .fcfcgov.conVcdm/search/?collection=ph&searchterm=121+n+ rg ant. Sections 9-end page 23 2 FM O Z TMM TOM ui M O Z O W w FM FM a w LL O Z O i= Q Z O Z W w I— U) w J z O i= Q Z LL w w N TOM ti ZI Packet Pg. 166 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property Location Map �pav me vmosv®mvoo® 1 1 829 827 825 821 A I 1 1 1 i J r Lj Bungalow Larimer Co, Colorado County and State ieavgv Laporte Ave vmmm gamvonamoomm oemcmem 819 817 813 805 801 731 727 E ED 8Z8 U4 UZ 818 814 310 808 806 800 820 0 625 125 250 N r El 730 7 W Mountain Ave Note: Outbuilding shown on south property line is not located on this parcel. Source: City of Fort Collins, 2017 Sections 9-end page 24 2 H W O z TMM TOM ui C0 Mn O 2 z O N W H a W F- L_ O z O H Q z O z LW r N W J z O FM Q z LL W_ W N TOM ti 0 _ E 0 z as a� 0 �a z a� E �a El Packet Pg. 167 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property Larimer Co, Colorado County and State Sketch map showing dimensions of 1887 house and extant additions I I r Original footprint (1887): 37' x 18 Addition 3 (1978): 10.5' x 18' Addition 1 (ca. 1905): 11' x 18' Garage (1990): 20' x 26' 2018 Aerial Image, Google Maps. Sections 9-end page 25 2 H W O z T N T W O 2 z O N W a a W u_ z O H Q z_ O z W W FM C9 W W J a z O H Q z u_ O W W N T O ti v El Packet Pg. 168 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property Historic Figures r�&Airew -f l( i :J.. r IG.: r7L r�, — C W } Larimer Co, Colorado County and State — Yr rrrr 1Rf�" .wF -nF.t•r-mow -y f2�G�f!_ _ ttif'y.il..__ - _ "�s"S� :•--.t,rt �i.v - _ _ .. � _. -•PERSPECTIVE VVIEW►=-= -- - e� y FOUR f.NA�!BEIe3.,, Nr TCNrN ON TMIRU PLOOII1- u.vrs �rxr NALL DINING NDOM r� rtXa rSXro Ask .—. G PARLOR rD44N0.e Rae CNAMM& NALI CNAMBfr► ri.e rf'd Sr/1 rSFtO 4 GRAN//A it —_- fip -' ..+ SCALE IN I M Jr.. r . =- t? = SECGHD _fiooFt r Figure 3: Plate 73, Modern Architectural Designs and Details (1881). "Brick and Frame Cottage, designed by Gould and Angell. Sections 9-end page 26 2 H w O z TMM TOM N Mn O 2 z O N W H H Q a W I— LL O z O FM O zN I.� W I— N a NWN LPL z O I— Q z LL O W_ W Q' CV TOM ti O E O z d 01 N _ O a z m �a Q Packet Pg. 169 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property ELEVATIONS Of DESIGN LEFT SIDE Larimer Co, Colorado County and State 1'lu, PLATE N° 73. NIGHT SIDE. Antr !r w .., Oft" Figure 4: Plate 74, Modern Architectural Designs and Details (1881), "Brick and Frame Cottage," elevations. Sections 9-end page 27 2 H w O z TMM TOM N Mn O 2 z O IY w FM Q a w F- LL O z O FM Q z O z tip w FM w J a z O FM Q z LL O w w N T ti v El Packet Pg. 170 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property MAIN r �• - ZOftNICE _•._• .. r f YiY�. ... .. ram. - I CRESTING ' Y 1 '�J..�r.-•-•-•�1�STWfitrv'.S-a..i.•'" :3vYiil '' .�iSlDp'Ii _ ORONT I STAIRCASE Tom' A —_ ` A 1 PA R'L-O R 1i1 M I H R O R L _— tiur J L Larimer Co, Colorado County and State Fj AY • 1 Ir A. B. & C. .SCALE If IN. 1 F T. ul.di iV.Y Figure 5: Plate 75, Modern Architectural Designs and Details (1881). "Brick and Frame Cottage," details Sections 9-end page 28 Packet Pg. 171 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property i , -:- Loomis Addition -:- 7he Capitol Hill of Fort Collins. THIS HOUSE AND FLLL4317LD LOT GIVEN AWAY. All Parties buylut o int in the Le"•min Ailditinn Yet a ticket, and when two hundred are null the cirizens ur Fort Colliu� "ill havv the druwing, and the luelcy ticket-hnldor will get it rhyr laid nulmem.n1 Bred title to above hnuse and full sired lort. Valued at $3,000. Price of lots $78 and tipward. Easy lmy tueuts. and 8 per cent. interest. Lots on sale at all real estate offices, G]Eos t Go DARROW, Agent, ROOM 32, WELCH BLOCK■ •,FORT COLLINS. Larimer Co, Colorado County and State Figure 6: "Loomis Addition" advertisement. Fort Collins Courier, June 9, 1887. Shows use of Plate 73 in advertisements for 121 N. Grant Avenue. 2 I— O z N TOM Ill to Mn O Cn W W FM FM Q a W H W O z O FM Q z O z W W I— W J a z O FM Q z W O W_ W N T ti _ 0 0 z L tli _ 0 to z m E to El Sections 9-end page 29 Packet Pg. 172 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Lafter Co, Colorado Name of Property County and State geaMV49 foRT [LINO, COLD dition %% ITLIA tl S IDUn ew Figure 7: Advertisement includes a map of Fort Collins showing the location of the Loomis Addition, and Plate 73 with the caption, "The House and Full-sized Lot Valued at $3,000 Given Away. Denver Public Library. http://digital.denverlibrary.orgtcdm/singleitern/collection/p16079co1139/id/958/rec/l. Sections 9-end page 30 2 H O Z T N T w O 2 Z w a a w u- O Z O H Q Z_ 5 O Z W w H C9 w W J a Z O H Q Z u_ O w w N T O ti v 0 c E 0 Z a� m 7a c 0 ca Z c m E M U M Z1 Packet Pg. 173 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NIPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property ?O f y II I I 1 1 I I I H /2 Q 8, le 17 JMr /X ( % r j., I/1116� 4_ _ .. r� / sa►.�rr. � - - / _xj x ?� Zr x z6' 77 Zl� t Larimer Co, Colorado County and State Figure 8: Detail from 1906 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map showing first addition. Digital Sanborn Maps, 1867-1970 online database, Denver Public Library. x I— O z TMM r W N z Cn W W FM FM a W u_ z 0 FM Q z z W W FM a NW I.L J a z 0 FM Q z u_ 0 w W N TOM ti 0 _ E 0 z L _ 0 M z f+ _ c� i <.i a Sections 9-end page 31 Packet Pg. 174 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property fib a i? Of le 0 R wwtw 0 f a ri t 0 Larimer Co, Colorado County and State a Figure 9: Detail from 1925 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map showing second addition. Digital Sanborn Maps, 1867-1970 online database, Denver Public Library. 2 H 0 z TMM TOM Lu z 0 W H H a a W H LL 0 z 0 FM z 0 z W W I— V NW I.L J a z 0 FM LL W W N TOM ti C O E O z L O M z f+ c� i <.i a Sections 9-end page 32 Packet Pg. 175 5.a United States Department of the interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Patterson House Name of Property Larimer Co, Colorado County and State Figure 8: East side, camera facing west. Photo taken by Larimer County Assessor, 1948. Shows house painted white, with ca. 1917-25 addition (south porch, demolished 1967) on south side and accessory building to the north (nonextant). Both are documented in the 1925 Sanborn map. Materials and details match house today. Original archived at Local History Archive, Fort Collins Museum of Discovery. Available online at http://database.history.fcgov.com/cdm/search/?collection=ph&searchterm=121+n+grant. Sections 9-end page 33 2 H W O z T N T w O 2 z O N W w a a w u- O z O H Q z 5 O z W w I- 0 w W J a z O Q z u_ O w w N T O ti v ZI Packet Pg. 176 5.a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NIPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 House Larimer Co, Colorado County and State Figure 9: South side (left) and east facade, camera facing northwest. Photo taken by Larimer County Assessor, 1967. Shows brick portion of house painted white. Wall on south side west of bay is unclear, but might be the south porch shown in the 1948 photo. To the west is the wood back porch that was removed in 1978.Otherwise materials and details match house today. Original archived at Local History Archive, Fort Collins Museum of Discovery. Available online at http://database.history.fcgov.com/cdm/search/?collection=ph&searchterm=121 +n+grant. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C.460 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 100 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Office of Planning and Performance Management. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, 1849 C. Street, NW, Washington, DC. Sections 9-end page 34 2 H W O z T N T w O 2 z O N w 1- 1— a a w H u- O z O FM Q z 5 O z w H 0 w W J a z O H Q z u_ O w w N T O ti v a 0 Y E 0 z L c 0 ca z c m E U M ZI Packet Pg. 177 i.- k.. M1� r y ; .y 14 J I �� 'ff ISM I =r14+ I t I� 1 � r � ,II t off �1 f JI 1 #. s p . 5 5.a 5 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0005 Detail of front porch, southeast corner, camera facing northwest; also showing sandstone foundation FM W O z T N T W U) D O 2 z O CO W W a a W LL O z O H Q z 5 O z W W FM CO 0 W W J a z O H Q z LL O W W N T O ti v a 0 Y E 0 z L a� �a c 0 ca z c a� E M U M ZI Packet Pg. 180 5.a 6 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0006 Front door, exterior, camera facing south FM w O z TMM TOM Cl) Mn O 2 z O w FM a a w F- LL O z O FM Q z O z w w FM U) w J a z O FM Q z LL O w w N TOM ti El Packet Pg. 181 5.a 7 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0007 South side, camera facing northwest FM z T N T 'W V/ 7 z O CO LW Lr r Qam W LL z O H Q z z W W FM CO 0 W W J a z O H Q z LL W_ W N T O ti C O ca C E O z d N d �a c 0 ca z c a� E U fa Q Packet Pg. 182 5.a 8 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0008 Rear (west) end of south side, showing rear additions (ca. 1905, 1978) and deck (2017) 9 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0009 Detail of gable end, west gable on south side (added in 1978), camera facing northeast FM W O z TOM W N Mn O 2 z O U) W w FM a a w F- LL O z O FM Q z O z W w FM U) w J a z O FM Q z LL O w w N TOM ti El Packet Pg. 183 5.a 10 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0010 South side, camera facing northeast Packet Pg. 184 5.a 11 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0011 West side, camera facing east 12 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0012 East fagade (left) and north side, camera facing southwest Packet Pg. 185 5.a vp 1. 13 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0013 North side, camera facing southwest Packet Pg. 186 660 / � 3 � 5.a 15 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House 0 015 North side and flagstone walkway, garage in background. Ca. 1905 addition has two windows (added in 1978) and sandstone foundation; 1978 addition extending west has concrete foundation. Camera facing west. FM W O z T N T W U) D O 2 z O CO W W a a W LL O z O H Q z 5 O z W W FM CO 0 W W J a z O H Q z LL O W W N T O ti v 0 E 0 z a� m �a c 0 Ca z c a� E M U f� ZI Packet Pg. 188 5.a 16 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0016 Interior, detail of newell post FM w O z TMM TOM N mn O 2 z O w FM a a w F- LL O z O FM Q z O z w w FM U) w J a z O FM Q z LL O w w N TOM ti El Packet Pg. 189 5.a 17 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0017 Garage, south (left) and east sides, camera facing northwest V FM W O z T N T W U) D O 2 z O CO W W a a W LL O z O H Q z 5 O z W W FM CO 0 W W J a z O H Q z LL O W W N T O ti v C O Y E O z L O Ca z E M U M ZI Packet Pg. 190 5.a _ zl 18 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0018 Garage, south (left) and east sides, camera facing northwest Packet Pg. 191 5.a 19 of 19: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0019 Garage, west side, camera facing east FM W O z T N T W U) D O 2 z O CO W W a a W LL O z O H Q z O z W W FM CO 0 W W J a z O H Q z LL O W W N T O ti v a 0 Y E O z L O Ca z E M U M ZI Packet Pg. 192 HISTORY 7/13/18 Karen McWilliams Community Development & Neighborhood Services P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Re: National Register of Historic Places nomination of the Patterson House (5LR.720),121 North Grant Avenue, Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado Dear Ms. McWilliams: In accordance with Colorado's Certified Local Government guidelines, nominations to the National Register of Historic Places must be presented to the local historic preservation commission and the chief elected official of the applicable Certified Local Government for review and comment. The above referenced property will be considered for National Register listing at the next Colorado Historic Preservation Review Board meeting on September 21, 2018. As a Certified Local Government, you have the opportunity to participate in this action. A copy of the draft nomination for this property is enclosed. Following your review, a letter outlining the support or objection of both your community's chief elected official and the Fort Collins Landmark Preservation Commission should be forwarded to this office prior to September 18, 2018. The enclosed CLG Report Form may be used in place of a formal letter. Please see the enclosed instructions for additional information. We invite you to attend the State Review Board meeting to be held on September 21, 2018 at the History Colorado Center, 1200 Broadway in Denver. The National Register meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. during which public comments are welcome concerning the eligibility of nominated properties. Please find enclosed a tentative agenda. A final agenda will be available the Monday before the meeting date. If any Historic Preservation Commission members anticipate attending the meeting, please contact our office at 303-866- 3392 so we may note your planned attendance in the agenda. We look forward to receiving comments from your community. If you have any questions regarding the nomination, please contact Amy Unger, National & State Register Historian, at 303-866-4684, or at amy-.unger(astate.co.us. Sincerely, Holly K. Norton, Ph.D Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Enclosures: CLG Nomination Instructions CLG Report Form Draft Nomination Form Tentative Agenda E 0 U L 0 N N rr aD W 0 J U c m E t U ca Q HISTORY COLORADO CENTER 1200 BROADWAY DENVER CO 80203 Packet Pg. 193 5.b Pot CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NOMINATION PROCESS The Certified Local Government program establishes a partnership between the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and Certified Local Governments (CLG) as nominating authorities for Colorado's National Register program. It does not delegate to CLGs the sole authority to nominate properties directly to the Register. The following procedures make clear the shared role of CLGs and the SHPO in the nomination process: 1. Nominations of Colorado properties to the National Register of Historic Places shall be made directly to the SHPO. Nominations may be made by any parties, including CLGs. 2. Upon receipt of an adequately documented nomination of a property within the jurisdiction of a CLG, the SHPO shall notify the owner, the chief elected official, and the local Historic Preservation Commission of the proposed nomination and shall transmit the nomination to the commission for comment. 3. The commission, after reasonable opportunity for public comment, shall prepare a report as to whether or not such property, in its opinion, meets the criteria of the National Register, 4. Within sixty (60) days of receipt of the nomination from the SHPO, the chief elected official shall transmit the report of the commission and his or her recommendation to the SHPO. The report should concentrate on the property's eligibility under the National Register criteria of eligibility. a. In the event that the Historic Preservation Commission and the chief elected official agree that the proposed nomination meets the criteria for listing the property in the National Register, the SHPO will transmit the proposed nomination and the CLG's comments to the Colorado Historic Preservation Review Board for consideration. The Review Board is an independent advisory board appointed by the Governor and SHPO that evaluates and recommends sites for nomination to the National Register. b. In the event the Historic Preservation Commission and the chief elected official disagree that the proposed nomination meets the criteria for listing in the National Register, both opinions shall be forwarded to the SHPO, who will transmit the proposed nomination and the CLG's comments to the Review Board for consideration. c. In the event the Historic Preservation Commission and the chief local elected official agree that the proposed nomination does not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register, the CLG shall inform the owner of the property and the applicant of its recommendation and shall inform them that within thirty (30) days an appeal of the recommendation may be made by letter directly to the SHPO. The Historic Preservation Commission shall forward the CLG's recommendations and the nomination to the SHPO, who will take no further action unless within thirty (30) days of the receipt of such recommendations by the SHPO, an appeal is filed by any person with the SHPO. If such an appeal is filed, the SHPO shall transmit the nomination and CLG's recommendations to the Review Board for consideration. 5. If no report is received by the SHPO from the chief elected official within the allotted sixty (60) days, the state shall make the nomination pursuant to section 101(a) of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended. Failure of the CLG to submit reports on proposed nominations within its jurisdiction will be considered by the SHPO in its review of the CLG. Packet Pg. 194 5.b CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PROCESS Page 2 6. Appeals of the SHPO's decisions maybe made directly to the Keeper of the National Register in accordance with federal regulations (36CFR60). 7. For proposed nominations of historic districts to the National Register of Historic Places, the CLG shall assist the SHPO in: a. Assisting the preparer of the form in verifying the names and addresses of the owners of properties within the proposed districts, if necessary. b. Providing for public information meetings at times and places agreeable to the SHPO and CLG. 8. The SHPO will notify the CLG, the owner, and the applicant when a property within the CLG's jurisdiction is listed in the National Register, 9. The Historic Preservation Commission shall be responsible for providing oversight and monitoring of historic properties and historic districts listed in the National Register of Historic Places. The commission is responsible to recommend in writing to the SHPO removal from the National Register of any property or district which has lost its integrity because of the demolition or alteration of structures. NOTE: This section addresses only properly completed National Register nomination forms which have been prepared in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Registration and Guidelines for Registration (Federal Register, v.48, no. 190, September 29, 1983, pp. 44726-44728) and the National Park Service's National Register Bulletin How to Complete National Register Registration Forms. Packet Pg. 195 1427 No 5.b OFFICE of ARCHAEOLOGY and HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1200 Broadway, Denver CO 80203 COLORADO CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION REVIEW REPORT FORM Property Name: Address: Certified Local Government: Date of public meeting at which nomination was reviewed: Eligibility Criteria: (Check applicable boxes) ❑ Criterion A ❑ Criterion B ❑ Criterion C ❑ Criterion D Please check the boxes below appropriate to the nomination review: Commission/Board ❑ The commission/board recommends that the nomination meets the criteria checked above. ❑ The commission/board recommends that the nomination fails to meet any of the above criteria. ❑ The commission/board chooses not to make a recommendation on the nomination. Attach an additional sheet explaining the lack of a recommendation. Chief Elected Official ❑ The chief elected official recommends that the nomination meets the criteria checked above. ❑ The chief elected official recommends that the nomination fails to meet any of the above criteria. ❑ The chief elected official chooses not to make a recommendation on the nomination. Attach an additional sheet explaining the lack of a recommendation. Attach an additional sheet to make any further comments. CLG Commission/Board Chair or Representative Print name: Signature: Chief Elected Official or Designee Print name: Signature: (Date) (Date) Packet Pg. 196 5.c ORDINANCE NO. 068, 2018 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS DESIGNATING THE MCMILLEN-PATTERSON PROPERTY, 121 NORTH GRANT AVENUE, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, AS A FORT COLLINS LANDMARK PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 14 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS WHEREAS, pursuant to -Section 14-2 of the City Code, the City Council has established a public policy encouraging the protection, enhancement and perpetuation of historic landmarks within the City; and WHEREAS, by resolution adopted on April 18, 2018, the Landmark Preservation Commission (the "Commission") determined that the McMillen -Patterson Property at 121 North Grant Avenue in Fort Collins, as more specifically described in the legal description below (the "Property"), is eligible for landmark designation for its high degree of exterior integrity, and for its significance to Fort Collins under Landmark Standard A (Events) and Standard C (Design/Construction) as contained in Section 14-5(2) of the City Code; and WHEREAS, the Commission further determined that the Property meets the landmark criteria set forth in City Code Section 14-5, is eligible for designation as a landmark, and has recommended to the City Council that the Property be designated as a landmark; and WHEREAS, the owner of the Property has consented to such landmark designation, and desires to protect the Property; and WHEREAS, such landmark designation will preserve the Property's significance to the community; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the recommendation of the Commission and TOM desires to follow such recommendation and designate the Property as a landmark; and co T WHEREAS, designation of the Property as a landmark is necessary for the prosperity, civic N pride, and welfare of the public. o z NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: c i o! Section 1. That the City Council hereby makes and adopts the determinations and m findings contained in the recitals set forth above, z i Section 2. That the Property located in the City of Fort Collins, Larimer County, w U Colorado, described as follows, to wit: z Q z 0 o! 0 c as E Packet Pg. 1 97 5.c NORTH 48 FEET OF LOT 16, BLOCK 291, LOOMIS ADDITION CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO be designated as a Fort Collins Landmark in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Code. Section 3. That alterations, additions and other changes to the buildings and structures located upon the Property will be reviewed for compliance with City Code Chapter 14, Article III, as currently enacted or hereafter amended. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 15th day of May, A.D. 2018, and to be presented for final passage on the 5th day of June, A.D. 2018, Mayor)Vro Tem ATTEST: of F©arca< • <� :' "= SEAL so go City Cler •• o Passed and adopted on final reading on the 5th day of June, A.D. 2018, ATTEST: J Mayor ��0�•FORT 9-0 SEAL. Tern 00 Too N LO O Z n -2- Packet Pg. 198 tl A J ♦i.4 NJ �I 1La�t13 A _u fi !: i "J JA..f �J .�.�+•ry '' .`''Ante. r AAd .. tJ�I d . 36 m iu Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings VICTORIAN DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND DETAILS William T Comstock Victorian architecture, with its quirky diversity, eclectic origins and exuberant ornamentation, continues to exert a strong attraction on today's architects, builders and homeowners. For those interested in restoring, preserving, or even recreating Victorian homes, authentic plans and designs are invaluable. This volume, meticulously reproduced from a rare 19th-century publication, offers an exceptionally rich pictorial record of actual mid- to late -Victorian designs. Extremely clear and detailed engravings —drawn to scale —present elevations, floor plans, perspectives and other drawings (in some cases, complete framing plans) for country houses and cottages in a variety of styles: Queen Anne, Eastlake, Elizabethan, Colonial, Jacobean, Southern, Californian and more. There are even designs for several store and office fronts, with counters, shelving, etc. Supplementing the large number of complete designs are nearly 700 large-scale drawings of virtually every architectural detail, many embodying the unique "gingerbread" that charac- terizes Victorian buildings. Included are clear, precise renderings of balusters, brackets, cornices, dormers, fireplaces, finials, gables, mantels, moldings, newels, piazzas, porches, rafters, rosettes, staircases, transoms, verandas, wainscoting, windows and hundreds of other features. For restorers of old houses, preservationists, students of American architectural history, admirers of Victoriana, anyone interested in the "Victorian Gothic" styles that dominated American domestic architecture in the late 1800s will want to have this inexpensive treasury of authentic century -old plans and details. Dover (1987) republication of Modern Architectural Designs and Details: Containing Aghty Finely Lithographed Plates ..., originally published by William T. Comstock, Architectural Publisher, New York, 1881. Preface. 734 black -and -white illustrations. 96pp. 9% x 121i. Paperbound. ALSO AVAILABLE THE ARcHmcrum of CouNTRY HousEs, Andrew Jackson Downing. 484pp. 5% x 84. 22003-6 Pa. $9.95 VICrORIAN COTTAGE RESIDENCES, Andrew Jackson Downing. 352pp. 5% x 8R. 24078-9 Pa. $7.95 VlcrOMAN HousEs: A TREASURY of LEssm-KNOWN ExAMPLEs, Edmund Gillon and Clay Lancaster. 117pp. 11% x 9%. 22966-1 Pa. $8.95 BICKNELL s VlcroRLkN BUn.DINGs, A. J. Bicknell. 192pp. 9% x 1 ". 23904-7 Pa. $7.95 Free Complete Dover Catalog available upon request. A DOVER EDITION DESIGNED FOR YEARS OF L'SE! We have made every effort to make this the best book possible. Our paper is opaque, with minimal show -through; it will not discolor or become brittle with age. Pages are bound in signatures, in the method traditionally used for the best books, and will not drop out. Books open flat for easy reference. The binding will not crack or split. This is a permanent book. *6.95 IN USA 9 0 n` y ISBN 0-486-25442-9 U111I1I11 Packet Pg. 198-2 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings Patterson House, Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado National Register Nomination Photo pages Packet Pg. 198-3 No Text Gas sea SIQF^�~ r f° Jfll P,IS� Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 5 of 20: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House _0005 Detail of front porch, southeast corner, camera facing northwest; also showing sandstone foundation Packet Pg. 198-6 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 6 of 20: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House _0006 Front door, exterior, camera facing south Packet Pg. 198-7 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 7 of 20: CO_Larimer County -Patterson House_0007 South side, camera facing northwest I Packet Pg. 198-8 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 8 of 20: CO_Larimer County -Patterson House_0008 Rear (west) end of south side, showing rear additions (ca. 1905, 1978) and deck (2017) 9 of 20: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House _0009 Detail of gable end, west gable on south side (added in 1978), camera facing northeast Packet Pg. 198-9 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 10 of 20: CO_Larimer County -Patterson House _0010 South side, camera facing northeast Packet Pg. 198=10 0 i A� r Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 13 of 20: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House _0013 North side, camera facing southwest Packet Pg. 198=12 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings Oq 14 of 20: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0014 West (rear) end of north side, showing rear addition, camera facing southwest Packet Pg. 198=13 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 15 of 20: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House _0015 North side and flagstone walkway, garage in background. Ca. 1905 addition has two windows (added in 1978) and sandstone foundation; 1978 addition extending west has concrete foundation. Camera facing west. Packet Pg. 198-14 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 16 of 20: CO_Larimer County -Patterson House _0016 Aerial view showing roof, north is at top of photo Packet Pg. 198=15 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 17 of 20: CO_Larimer County -Patterson House_0017 Interior, detail of newell post Packet Pg. 198=16 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 18 of 20: CO_Larimer County Patterson House _0018 Garage, south (left) and east sides, camera facing northwest Packet Pg. 198=17 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 19 of 20: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House _0019 Garage, south (left) and east sides, camera facing northwest Packet Pg. 198=18 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 20 of 20: CO_Larimer County_Patterson House_0020 Garage, west side, camera facing east Packet Pg. 198=19 Item 5, Exhibit 1 121 N. Grant Designation Additional Photos & Drawings 19 of 20: CO—Larimer County_Side Patterson House_0019 East side, camera facing west Photographer: Larimer County Assessor Date of Photograph: 1948 20 of 20: CO_Larimer County_Side Patterson House _0020 South side (left) and east fagade, camera facing northwest Photographer: Larimer County Assessor Date of Photograph: 1967 Packet Pg. 198-20 a ....rss `..w JRVJLs241M1Y'NS wtiti4 r�aww _ t Y S}.1.'tiiijj �Jy, mm mwwy — J r �,.'�WO iNolt li ti A1rrr" Ile CI � ��e s em ON ■ _ _�I'R� 111111 will Iasi aw FIX WWI c 3Y ■ten • we I I19 -_I00 . ems ,7 x, t- / -N al _ ..N. .. �.• •��`_-- -- d..low.. Y : -- •.::..�...�: —A ___% ::::m ama - ------ ...........: ...ammo. -- = e Waft we == iolmrmLrAapr.:snl Ia :.= :mama `, mama. __ --- n,.. - - maa 4. I1J y .un:11lillill�linTunAl won Immom AMR me00 �e �1u:BN1MI �`• ftg No Text ITEM 5, EXHIBIT 2 Staff Presentation Presented at Hearing 8/7/2018 • Nat'l Register under Criterion C: Design/Construction — Late Victorian/Stick/Eastlake architecture • Exterior Integrity: Location, Design, Setting, Materials, Workmanship, Feeling, and Association • Gould and Angell, Architects; Herman W. Schroeder, Builder • Constructed in 1887; additions ca.1905, ca.1920, 1978 • Fort Collins Landmark, Ordinance No. 068, 2018 Packet Pg. 198-24 1 a 415IL;K sw , y 121 N Grant — McMillen -Patterson Property r•+ k/' e , 1. - a.. 3 121 N Grant — McMillen -Patterson Property �A p ''tifr..ffuJ' t... ` _ �... _ Facade, East Elevation details ens 0 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT 2 Staff Presentation Presented at Hearing 8/7/2018 City +of Cottins Fort Packet Pg. 198-26 3 III 121 N Grant — McMillen -Patterson Property South Elevation 7 121 N Grant — McMillen -Patterson Property West Elevation North Elevation $ ITEM 5, EXHIBIT 2 Staff Presentation Presented at Hearing 8/7/2018 • Certified Local Government: provide Colorado Historic Preservation Review Board with comments • Review criteria: significance for architecture; 7 aspects of integrity • Commission may adopt a resolution for staff to prepare a report • Staff recommends supporting Nat'l Reg listing Packet Pg. 198-28 5 Agenda Item 6 PROJECT NAME 221 EAST MOUNTAIN - FINAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposed four-story, mixed -use development of office, retail and residential uses with a single -level parking structure below grade. The 0.449- acre lot is at 221 East Mountain Avenue on Block 131, lots 1-6, at the former location of the Goodyear Tire Shop. The project fronts both East Mountain Avenue and Mathews Street on the southwest corner of the intersection, and also fronts alleys to the south and west. The approximate square footage total, including the garage, is 90,172 square feet. The project is within the Downtown (D) District. APPLICANT: Bob Hosanna, Neenan Archistruction RECOMMENDATION: Approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking a recommendation regarding the proposed project's compliance with Land Use Code Section 3.4.7. The Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) provided conceptual review comments at its March 21, 2018 and May 16, 2018 meetings. As the project is categorized as a Basic Development Review (BDR) proposal, staff will provide the final decision. Staff review of the project is nearing completion and the assigned planner has determined that no major design changes to the current proposal are likely to occur as the result of the final review comments from staff. LPC'S ROLE: At this meeting, the Landmark Preservation Commission will conduct final review of the project's compliance with LUC 3.4.7 based on the attached plans and make a recommendation based on its findings to the decision maker. AREA OF ADJACENCY: The area of adjacency consists of historic properties within a 200-foot radius of the project parcel. 1. Abutting Properties Individually Eligible for Fort Collins Designation (based on recent non -binding determinations of eligibility conducted for nearby development review) • 133 Mathews (Frozen Food Center) 2. Other Designated Fort Collins Landmarks within 200-foot radius • Old Town Historic District contributing properties (250 E. Mountain, 238/240 E Mountain) • Poudre Garage, 148 Remington Item # 6 Page 1 Packet Pg. 199 Agenda Item 6 3. Other Properties Individually Eligible for Fort Collins Designation within 200-foot radius • 137-143 Mathews (McIntyre House) • 210 E Oak (Zoric Cleaners) • 300 E. Oak (Mennonite Church) - constructed 1954 • 142 Remington Two properties, 216 East Oak and 220 East Oak, are within the 200-foot buffer and are at least 50 years old but are not individually eligible for designation based on recent non -binding determinations of eligibility conducted for nearby development review. SAMPLE MOTION FOR ESTABLISHING AREA OF ADJACENCY: I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission adopt the properties summarized in the staff report as the area of adjacency for the proposed development at 221 East Mountain Avenue. REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS OF FACT: Land Use Code (LUC) Section 3.4.7, Historic and Cultural Resources contains the applicable standards for new buildings, where designated or eligible historic landmarks or historic districts are part of the development site or surrounding neighborhood context. LUC 3.4.7(F) New Construction: "(1) To the maximum extent feasible, the height, setback and width of new structures shall be similar to: (a) those of existing historic structures on any block face on which the new structure is located and on any portion of a block face across a local or collector street from the block face on which the new structure is located.... Notwithstanding the foregoing, this requirement shall not apply if, in the judgment of the decision maker, such historic structures would not be negatively impacted with respect to their historic exterior integrity and significance by reason of the new structure being constructed at a dissimilar height, setback and width. Where building setbacks cannot be maintained, elements such as walls, columns, hedges or other screens shall be used to define the edge of the site and maintain alignment. Taller structures or portions of structures shall be located interior to the site." • The applicant has requested a modification to the fourth story stepback standard specified in the Downtown zoning district. Planning staff is prepared to approve that request based on the overall similarity of the scale of the building to the nearby Mitchell Block and the Elizabeth Hotel. Factors include the erosion of massing at the fourth story balcony locations, modulation of the building mass, and an appropriate pedestrian environment at the ground level. • The proposed building height is 54 feet, which is within the allowable height of 56 feet. The height of the abutting Frozen Food Center is 26 feet. In previous conceptual review discussions, the LPC discussed several ways to improve the height response to the abutting building, including a stepback or a material change. The current design indicates that the height of the base of the glass railing for the corner balcony is 30'-2" to provide a reference to the height of the historic building, and the structure above that steps back at the corner. While the balconies and balcony roofs at the third and fourth stories impact the perception of a reduction in building mass, this design element does improve the transition between the smaller abutting historic building and the larger new construction. The second story headers on the east elevation also align with the height of the abutting Frozen Food Center. • The proposed facade width is 150 feet on Mountain and 130 feet on Mathews. The fagade width of the abutting Frozen Food Center is 45 feet, and the Mathews street elevation contains a massing element of equivalent length on its north end for reference. • The two primary facades on Mountain and Mathews are articulated into discernable sections reflective of historic building widths through the use of varying materials and material planes. • The setback on both streets will be within 1 foot of the property line, with some variations due to fagade detailing. The abutting Frozen Food Center building at 133 Mathews also has a zero -lot line. "(2) New structures shall be designed to be in character with such existing historic structures. Horizontal elements, such as cornices, windows, moldings and sign bands, shall be aligned with those of such existing historic Item # 6 Page 2 Packet Pg. 200 Agenda Item 6 structures to strengthen the visual ties among buildings. Window patterns of such existing structures (size, height, number) shall be repeated in new construction, and the pattern of the primary building entrance facing the street shall be maintained to the maximum extent feasible." • The applicant notes that the window fenestration is intended to reflect the smaller scale, vertical orientation, and twinned patterning seen throughout the historic core, with expressed window headers and sills. At the March LPC meeting, a member noted the importance of the return on windows and other design details. The windows are recessed by 3 inches and the storefront systems by approximately 24 inches. • The current design has eliminated the vertical band of windows on the Mountain Avenue elevation. • The building base includes an articulated brick cornice. • Windows on the south elevation directly reference the window design on the abutting historic Frozen Food Center. "(3) The dominant building material of such existing historic structures adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the proposed structure shall be used as the primary material for new construction. Variety in materials can be appropriate but shall maintain the existing distribution of materials in the same block." • The project consists of a steel super structure with a composite concrete/steel floor system with balloon framed metal studs at the exterior skin. • The proposed skin will consist of brick and stone masonry, prefinished cementitious smooth wall panels, prefinished smooth metal panels, and aluminum glazing systems with clear glass. The roofing system will be an adhered TPO membrane. • The revised design is improved from the previous version in its use of brick on the Mathews (east) and Mountain (north) elevations, creating a stronger reference to the historic pattern of development and the use of brick as the dominant building material and a more legible relationship of building materials to massing components. • The use of prefinished smooth panels with minimal detailing on the southeast corner of the building recognize the abutting smooth -finished CMU of the Frozen Food Center. "(4) Visual and pedestrian connections between the site and neighborhood focal points, such as a park, school or church, shall be preserved and enhanced, to the maximum extent feasible." • The applicant notes that the project will improve existing pedestrian conditions on the southwest corner of East Mountain and Mathews. Sidewalks will be repaired and/or replaced and widened to meet the building edge. Staff concludes that the overall and massing and scale of the building is similar to the Mitchell Block across Mountain Avenue and does not impede the view corridor into the historic core from the E. Mountain Avenue entry point. Balconies on the Mountain Avenue elevation will provide additional view corridors for building occupants of the historic Old Town district. "(5) To the maximum extent feasible, existing historic and mature landscaping shall be preserved, and when additional street tree plantings are proposed, the alignment and spacing of new trees shall match that of the existing trees. • The project will incorporate new landscaping elements at the building base and will include new street trees as required by City code. The existing trees on East Mountain Avenue along the north property line and in the landscaped island will remain. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings of fact, staff concludes that the development plan respects the integrity of the adjacent historic properties and its design is compatible with the existing historic character of the area of adjacency, and thus supports a positive recommendation of the proposal for 221 East Mountain Avenue (BDR180012). Item # 6 Page 3 Packet Pg. 201 Agenda Item 6 SAMPLE MOTION FOR RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL: If the Commission agrees that the project is compatible with Land Use Code section 3.4.7 and is ready to complete its development review of the proposal for 221 East Mountain Avenue, it may propose a motion based on the following: "I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to the Decision Maker approval of the proposal for 221 East Mountain Avenue (BDR180012), finding it is in compliance with the standards contained in Land Use Code section 3.4.7 in regard to compatibility with the character of the project's area of adjacency for the following reasons: • The project does not impact the integrity or individual eligibility for designation of the historic properties in the defined area of adjacency. • The project design uses massing and scale that is compatible with the historic context. • The project relies on building materials that are visually compatible with adjacent historic properties. • The project uses window patterning and proportions that provide visual ties to buildings within the adjacent historic context. • The proposed design does not impede existing visual and pedestrian connections to the adjacent neighborhood focal points. Note: The Commission may propose additional findings of fact or remove any of these proposed findings according to its evaluation. ATTACHMENTS 1. 221 E Mtn Final Review Staff Presentation (PDF) 2. Applicant resubmittal_7_30_18 compressed (PDF) 3. LPC May 16, 2018 Minutes - EXCERPT 221 E Mountain (PDF) Item # 6 Page 4 Packet Pg. 202 6.a City of Fort Collins ` • Historic Core Subdistrict of the Downtown (D) District • Half -acre lot at 221 East Mountain Avenue (former location of Goodyear Tire) • Fronts East Mountain Avenue and Mathews Street on the southwest corner (alleys to west and south) • 4-story mixed -use: office, retail and residential uses • Single -level parking structure below grade • Approximate square footage, including garage = 90,172 square feet W W W FM z W a O J W W 0 J a z LL z z D O Q W TOM N T r Q ti Packet Pg. 203 v Ito JZJ -..... 11 a- tv e4i�.-i 4 fr4k ???.&MOW � �9 •� '� MCHI if! Area of Adjacency I Area of Adjacency e -- 11 Boom 11 111111 Now a NCA 11 VIEW OF OVEFALL PROJECT FROM SOUTHWEST CURRENT ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER Area of Adjacency 6.a ii��lffil.0 � ._ � _ �eF�=�e�W�Sai$i111 c� ,��,�'se�F _ 4 F`CCiitty of Collins • The project does not impact the integrity or individual eligibility for designation of the historic properties in the defined area of adjacency. • The project design uses massing and scale that is compatible with the historic context. • The project relies on building materials that are visually compatible with adjacent historic properties. • The project uses window patterning and proportions that provide visual ties to buildings within the adjacent historic context. • The proposed design does not impede existing visual and pedestrian connections to the adjacent neighborhood focal points. W W W H z W 2 a 0 W W 0 J a z UM z a z D 0 Q W TOM N T r C) ti Packet Pg. 208 6.a J a z LL z a z D 0 Q w TOM N N T r C) ti c Q W N L a ca 3 a� a� �a c M c w T N N a-� C L V M a� El Packet Pg. 209 6,b AL 11 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN .woiroo— i LL 1 -� �' -,,, 111,11111111111 Z J v. ' _� \ • _ - 1111111 I �- a .r dl `IwN.I, h. 1 Z yU,11.u'u�n� 111 r�a�al �T O aa �� W .. F1trG �. •, � � a .44 r �- . �■ �� dam►„�, . N 04 000 044 O o Q C la I N •, / t U) E DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE PROFILES Ou co qrm M ti m E 7 rn U L m U .Q Q a E U HUKILUIV I AL Ktl-tKLINUL a August 15, 2018 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 210 Y� 9� �I �a li III II „ o .,. A' y 6.b BRICK WINDOW SILLS RELIEFED 1" 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN BRICK BASE FACADE RELIEFED BY 8" WITH ARTICULATED BRICK CORNICE RELIEF AT MASSING CHANGES BUILDING ARTICULATION J a z U. z Q z 0 a W r N N r r O ti U N rn d L Q I_ 0 U O r I O CO) I I E to N L U Q Q Q C E L U m Gl August 15, 2018 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 212 6.b FORT COLLINS LAND USE CODE, SEC. 143 - HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES (A) Purpose. This Section is intended to ensure that, to the maximum extent feasible: (1) historic sites, structures or objects are preserved and incorporated into the proposed development and any undertaking that maypotentially alterthe characteristics of the historic property is done in a way that does not adversely affect the integrity or significance of the historic property; and (2) new construction is designed to respectthe historic character of the site and any historic properties in the surrounding neighborhood. This Section is intended to protect designated or individually eligible historic sites, structures or objects, as well as sites, structures or objects in designated historic districts, whether on or adjacent to the development site. The proposed site, Block 131, Lots 1-6, does not have a historical designation attached to the property. The existing Goodyear Tire Store is not deemed eligible for designation. The design and construction of the proposed 4 story building will respect the historic character of the district on East Mountain Ave. and the Old Town Historic District through a select material palette representative of the area, similar massing elements, similar building scale and similar fenestration patterns. (B) General Standard. tithe project contains a site, structure or object that (1) is determined to be or potentially be individually eligible for local landmark designation or for individual listing in the State Register of Historic Properties or National Register of Historic Places; (2) is officially designated as a local or state landmark or is listed on the National Register of Historic Places; or (3) is located within an officially designated national, state or City historic district or area, then, to the maximum extent feasible, the development plan and building design shall provide for the preservation and adaptive use of the historic structure. The development plan and building design shall protect and enhance the historical and architectural value of any historic property that is: (a) preserved and adaptively used on the development site; or (b) is located on property adjacent to the development site and qualifies under (1), (2) or (3) above. New Structures must be compatible with the historic character of any such historic property, whether on the development site or adjacent thereto. The proposed site does not have an historical designation associated with it. The proposed project site and structure are determined to not be eligible for local, State or National designation and is not within an officially designated historical zone. The property to the south of the project is eligible for historic designation. The original use of the building was a frozen food storage building and today is used for residential purposes. The 2-story painted block structure was considered in the proposed design. The south facade of the proposed project is visible due to the alley that separations the proposed building and the frozen food building. Upgraded materials were used on the proposed south facade. Brick and cementitious panels are proposed with the brick rising to a height that suggests a scale relative to the height of the food locker building. Glass block window sections are used on the alley facade as a direct reference to the Frozen Food Building. The window pattern used on the east end of the south facade of the proposed building are patterned after the random sized windows on the Frozen Food Building. By reducing the corner massing of the 3rd and 4th floors with a cantilevered cover on the balconies, the perceived height of the building corners is reduced. The brick veneer at the southeast comer of the proposed building has been replaced by a smooth material as a direct reference to the monochromatic and smooth appearance of the Frozen Food Building. (C) Determination of Landmark Eligibility. The determination of individual eligibility or potential individual eligibility for local landmark designation will be mode in accordance with the Applicable provisions of Chapter 14 of the City Code, except that the determination of potential individual eligibility shall be made by the Director and the finding of potential eligibility shall not constitute a finding of eligibility under Section 14.21 or 14.72 of the City Code. A site, structure or object may be determined to be or potentially be individually eligible for local landmark designation if it meets one (1) or more of the criteria described in Section 14-5, "Standards for determining the eligibility of sites, structures, objects and districts for designation as Fort Collins Landmarks or Landmark Districts"of the City Code. The determination of individual eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places or State Register of Historic Properties shall be according to the processes and procedures of the Colorado Historical Society. The property and existing building have been determined to not be eligible for landmark designation. (D) Reuse, Renovation, Alterations and Additions. (1) Original or historic materials and details, as well as distinctive form and scale, that contribute to the historic significance of the structure or neighborhood shall be preserved to the maximum extent feasible. Rehabilitation work shall not destroy the distinguishing quality or character of the structure or its environment. (2) The rehabilitation of structures shall be in conformance with the Secretary of the Interior's "Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Building" (available from the Directors adopted design guidelines or standards The proposed project will not include any reuse, renovation, alterations or additions. (E) Demolition. A site, structure or object that is determined to be or potentially beindividually eligible for local landmark designation or for individual listing in the Notional Register of Historic Places or State Register of Historic Properties may be demolished only if, in the opinion of the decision maker, the applicant has, to the maximum extent feasible, attempted to preserve the site, structure or object in accordance with the standard of this Section, and the preservation of the site, structure or object is not feasible. The existing Mountain View Tire Center building will be removed. (F) New Construction. (1) To the maximum extent feasible, the height, setback and width of new structures shall be similar to: la) those of existing historic structures on any black face on which the new structure is located and on any portion of a block face across a local or collector street from the block face on which the new structure Is located,, or (b) when a block does not exist, similar to those on any land adjacent to the property on which the new structure is to be located. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this requirement shall not apply if, in the judgment of the decision make, such historic structures would not be negatively impacted with respect to their historic exterior integrity and significance by reason of the new structure being constructed of a dissimilar height setback and width. Where building setbacks cannot be maintained, elements such as wall, columns, hedges or other screens shot; be used to define the edge of the site and maintain alignment. Taller structures or portions of structures shall be located interior to the site. The height, width and setback are consistent with the lid Town Core and the Downtown District. The proposed height is within the allowable 56' height recommendation set forth in the Land Use Code, Div. 4.16 and is relative to other 4 story structures in the district. The facade widths on Mountain and Mathews are 15D' and 130' respectfully. Both facades are articulated into discernable sections by varying materials and material planes that respect the scale of the historic character of the area. The setback on Mountain and Mathews will be within 1' of the property line and will have slight variations with the facade detailing. This zero -lot line setback Is consistent with the district and especially for building located on major intersections and corner lots. The Frozen Food Center Building (133 Mathews), located south of this project, Is also a zero -lot line building and has a width of 45' and a height of 260. Both dimensions are evident in the proportions of the Mathews facade. The header height of the second -floor windows and the width of the material change and architectural articulation, both relate directly to the Frozen food Building. The smooth texture proposed for this articulation is also relative to the frozen building. (2) New structures shall be designed to be in character with such existing historic structures. Horizontal elements, such as cornices, windows, moldings and sign bands, shall be oligned with those of such existing historic structures to strengthen the visual ties among building. Window patterns of such existing structures (size, height, number) shall be repeated in new construction, and the pattern of the primary building entrance facing the street shall he maintained to the maximum extent feasible. August 15, 2018 4 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 213 6.b FORT COLLINS LAND USE CODE, SEC. 143 - HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES - CON'T. The proposed design has taken into consideration the design characteristics of the surrounding buildings and the Old Town Historic District. The articulation and scale of the facades on Mountain Ave. and Mathews St. are segmented to represent the storefronts of the late 1800 and early 1900's. These 'segments' breakup the massing of these larger facades. The window fenestration also reflects the scale and patterning seen throughout the downtown district. The windows are generally smaller in scale and are vertical in nature often forming pairs. Expressed window headers and sills are used in areas to accentuate the selected building masses. Larger sections of glazing are used selectively in the main building entrance and to enhance the design at the promenade building corner. Horizontal ties to the district are taken into consideration through similar floor to floor heights resulting in similar sill and head heights on the windows and building breaks. Vertical column elements are evident at the street level reinforcing the street level scale of the older buildings in the area. All signage will be located within the first story facade zone. The types of signage will include flush wall mounted and bracket hung signs. All signage will follow all City of Fort Collins sign regulations. (3) The dominant building of such existing historic structures adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the proposed structure shall be used as the primary material for new construction. Variety in materials can be appropriate but shall maintain the existing distribution of materials in the some block. The material palette utilizes materials represented in the district. Materials to include standard clay masonry, cementitious prefinished smooth panels, prefinished smooth metal panels, stone masonry, and typical aluminum window systems with clear glazing. (4) Visual and pedestrian connections between the site and neighborhood focal points, such as park, school or church, shall be preserved and enhanced, to the maximum extent feasible. The pedestrian experience will be improved from the current conditions. (2) curb cuts will be eliminated and replaced will on street diagonal parking. Sidewalks will be replaced and/or repaired and widened to new building edge. Planting elements will be incorporated into the new building base elements. Additional street trees will be planted as per City code. Several existing trees will remain. No parks, schools or churches were considered in the project. (5) To the maximum extent feasible, existing historic and mature landscaping shall be preserved, and when additional street tree plantings are proposed, the alignment and spacing of new trees shall match that of the existing trees. Existing trees located on Mountain Ave. along the north property line and in the corner landscaped island will remain. No other landscaping exists on the property. (6) In its consideration of the approval cf plans for properties containing or adjacent to sites, structure, objects or districts that: (a) have been determined to be or potentially be individually eligible for local landmark designation orfor individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places or the State Register of Historic Properties, or (b) are officially designated as a local or state landmark or are listed on the National Register of Historic Places or (c) are located within a officially designated national, state or local historic district or area, the decision maker shall receive and consider a written recommendation from the Landmark Preservation Commission unless the Director has issued a written determination that the plans would not have a significant impact on the individual eligibility or potential individual eligibility of the site, structure, object or district. A determination or recommendation made under this subsection is not appealable to the City Council under Chapter 2 of the City Code. We will the proposed project will not have would not have a significant impact on the individual eligibility or potential individual eligibility of the site, structure, object or district. rj 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN August 15, 2018 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 214 6 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN :..: :_ o 10 3 zo T N N qrm ti d N N d L Q E O 0 00 r Cl August 15, 2018 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 215 6.b 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN ■ lommimmlonlow 21 n IIIII • a � d N SOUTH ELEVATION a. Q I_ 0 U Co Tmm M ti cC E )H CEMENTITIOUS Y a. CU U CL WEST ELEVATION aD E � v o s ,o ,s 20 25 c� Q August 15, 2018 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 216 6.b I EXISTING PARKING 5TRUGTURE LOTS 1$ KOCK 131 OWNER FORT COLL" DOWNTOWN 0�wriomw AUTHOtn 10' YX. EASMENT I I M 0 1"n EA5T MOUNTAIN AVE. ,000p as 3'. AT• �� d Icy G!. 91 h.o. iaa a roan I I I I I I I I I I I I t I } I I I I Z I I I I y �I� EXISTING ALLEY -WAY,, �- I � - I - -��� —ira/c=--------------- LOT27 ROOK 131 OWNEk. OPSV4MCCHEIEIM RENTALS UNITED TNRTNERS11 8] 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN } 1 I :ANC b 5 SITE PLAN A ti f� E 3 Cn c Q C E U m Gl August 15, 2018 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 217 6.b NOTE FC 1'-O" FIR TYPIC OFF5E EAST MOUNTAIN AVENUE e T O I wa-0 -0" 14-01/4' Zi-0" ZlO 21TO 31'-2 3 4' 16'-5. -0. N 89 3T1574 149.99' 14 I I ----- I -----I ----- --ter- -----�----- -- [: OUTSIDE FAGE OF UNDATION WALL 5ET B> ST� TMrs oxEn OM PROPERTY LINE- AL AT NORTH. rIE5T. AND EAST SIDES. TMP v " x 1a p- 5r u5 40 PARI4ING SPACES C ON SOUTH SIDE TO c E " BE 1'-6" col+crnFre F�oo�x - s11FE ro vRATis •2sa I 1 va" eixE 3rrnuGE 1 nccEnoar A a ��• �r -- --_ - - -� - - - - -_ - - - - _- T-0x Bf" E=T 5H T PROPERtt LII£ q a p 4 m'Pr of 9 O E�ZTIIJ6 PARKING STR.cNRE IN Q 1 1 m I IT 9'G orb K U C ms 1 � smucnmx W TM4BAeya°cE zz-i 12° W Om O \EX R vEsr. b ILNG R/WP W 6" I p 3ETYPS(l'L itGomGrwrL-a�. neJgexT 4 (ro eE vER>F,Fv) (a) oss x 1a e a-0I I I invrw rye I a°T�x. cMu 15'_11• aeicv�o 5Tx I 1 10 wFI E FWF s TER PuMF SNOW MELT c/�NIRIA 5 b RnnM I I 1 I 1 5 b9 31)'10" E 149.99' o?o oxa�a O&a EF A EXI5fTN6 ALLEY 18,8-70 50. FT! &ROSS N o s 10 15 20 �s O w 4.1 W W O K Uj O 4 L rn L Q O U 00 r Cl GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN August 15, 2018 91 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION , Packet Pg. 218 EAST MOUNTAIN AVENUE III L -0" 14-01/4' Zi-0" ZlO Zl0' 31'-23/4" 16•_5• ,'-0" I I p LL — 6 To= Z I I I tti I `coal Z NOTE: our5mEFAGEOF ----- -----lid--------- --------- --------------- -� - -� O FOUNDATION MALL SET 1'-O" FROM PROPERTY LINE- TYPIGAL AT NORTH, PlEST, AND EA5T SIDES. OFFSET ON SOUTH SIDE TO C BE 1'-6" LEASE sP LEASE SPACE O W ao gab .T -r9 r Cq I 4.1 � ,6 I COMMERCSAL I — _ — _ _ — — — I — — — TOM O ....... ... I S E45TING PARIQi16 SIRIKNRE ................... s Li l : mr,mn+orGa,� a O Q. «R a„m waLLs n IF .... .......................... ............... x $ E O mw .oR«mziez MEE/ RE R_FSTIJENTT_AL Li z x z arz,xcu cxrcf ro u,Ncaa 3'x3'eszmwnJ ELECT : LOBBY ROOME............................1........ ..... 00 M RO M L£hSE SPKE I WOMENS CC I RESIRM 5a-to t2' � - }1 a }1 L Q rvkrve raga. ixs E Fl/T1/RE K GHEN 1 0 o a LOGA I N 4 0 0 NOTE: ELEGTRIGAL TRANSFORMER N TO BE LOCATED SUBMERSED VAULT - O MENS �+ E _ O RESIRM LOCATION AND SIZE TO BE DETERMINED I ro eE crJun 3a.�b�E Ew.�. Vo,r-E.,e,o Li + ..e. e..a.a, wc�oymE ro.».a 0 o .o.. Q. to w.r�wcre � ry IF � O. A 1�c - EXISTING ALLEY N E n n U V Q FIRST FLOOR PLAN 18,490 SQ. FT. GROSS (APPROX.) August 15, 2018 O 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 219 EXL ' FARKIN6 5TRL6 -----I t�--------i-------i-------- i-- II l� I �•,,�` I 5, wi sa. FT . I I I ./vo.c�-F� GOMMERGIAL I "------ __----- _. I T-3"SEPERAT10N ®Exly�(64.11'�1 ME:AIANIGAL GNA5E EROM EIRURE KLfGNEN eEL°w o0 0 o0 0 — — 7-- III — — --- I 00 00 O I I I 4�6 sQ Fr I I I 2�F I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I I ------------------------------ --------- I I I I I I I I RM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o s 10 15 20 25 O SECOND FLOOR PLAN 18,358 SQ. FT. GROSS (APPROX.) 'I 'I 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN r N N r T zo August 15, 2018 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 220 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o s 10 15 20 25 O SECOND FLOOR PLAN 18,358 SQ. FT. GROSS (APPROX.) 'I 'I 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN r N N r T zo August 15, 2018 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 220 6,b - -� — o0 0 o o m' moPVAM PJIM�mI m E45T PARKING STRLL soa i 1 6EDROOM ali��i�`� Rr F F,T �� I I Ld II I O 'I 2 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN 306 i BEDR�I-I O O _.Lm - KAI: A �I � ■I � Y ■111111110" I a� to to Q 0 00 r ti 304 N 2 eEDRoar, I 0 I E N U IF- F� U o s ,D ,s 20 25 a THIRD FLOOR PLAN 17,227 SQ. FT. GROSS (APPROX.) August 15, 2018 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 221 q �Q o Q Q o 0 411 412 413 Z I l � I I , eEORoon, , , emRooM i , emRoad i I I I z I a z �I D ° °oFINE 2 BEDROOM w/ 0 O 2 I Cl) w o 10 o 0 17 ° 0 O o N 0 0 0 o o TOM 0 0 0 0 TOM 0 o o o 4.1 o �. Mo MEGH. cHnSE wa a..® s PLec cu c�v�Er ° O O 40.2 �y/� E%ISiING PARIc1N6 5lRKNRE V 'vss /�� ....... 1 8-0 W 0 0 ro o ❑w / O ° - n�frvc ®oPer�.r� P�Ec,ruc ti cwr� .. ^ K JJ O 403 G Aq 00 �O 113 R TOM --- - - - ° - - -----------0 of 00 o ° ° M ,eEDRocw ti o , o +'' O O O O ol 01No 4oe I I� �p I D o o I 7 B DRAM - 404 d - Cn O - - O O _—_—_—_ L 2 BEDROOM �..� �O � � o � a�_ Do i o � I —� v I Q 0* Q a 401 406 405 N6EDR001.1 w/ vET, , emRGG\'JM , emRcoM ry � O O 5 10 15 20 25 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 17,227 SO. FT. GROSS (APPROX.) August 15, 2018 13 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 222 EXLST PARKA'& 5lRKNRE 14 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE, FORT COLLINS, CO NEENAN _.�.. J Q I I , I z I I a z 0 I N LU Tmm �I N IITOM TOM OF PLAZA O I I mo I CL - Y I_ U M JG RUN TOM I � I M I m I } A R AT PEFWETER OF DQ WV I_ I L I U_ `JCL CL I I W - - - - - - - -- E t U � N Q ROOF PLAN O August 15, 2018 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION Packet Pg. 223 s.c Meg Dunn, Chair Alexandra Wallace, Vice Chair Michael Bello Katie Dorn Kristin Gensmer Per Hogestad Kevin Murray Mollie Simpson City Council Chambers City Hall West 300 Laporte Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. Video of the meeting will be broadcast at 1:30 p.m. the following day through the Comcast cable system on Channel 14 or 881 (HD). Please visit http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/ for the daily cable schedule. The video will also be available for later viewing on demand here: http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php. Regular Meeting May 16, 2018 Minutes - EXCERPT for 221 E. Mountain • CALL TO ORDER Chair Dunn called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. • ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dunn, Gensmer, Simpson, Dorn, Bello, Murray ABSENT: Hogestad, Wallace STAFF: McWilliams, Bzdek, Bumgarner, Yatabe, Schiager, Wray ***BEGIN EXCERPT*** 6. 221 EAST MOUNTAIN - CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposed four-story, mixed -use development of office, retail and residential uses with a single -level parking structure below grade. The 0.449- acre lot is at 221 East Mountain Avenue on Block 131, lots 1-6, at the former location of the Goodyear Tire Shop. The project fronts both East Mountain Avenue and Mathews Street on the southwest corner of the intersection and fronts alleys to the south and west. The approximate square footage total, including the garage, is 90,172 square feet. The project is within the Downtown (D) District. APPLICANT: Bob Hosanna, Neenan Archistruction City of Fort Collins Page 1 May 16, 2018 W W z W 2 a O J W W 0 J Q z LL z Q z D O 2 H Cn Q W _ _ 0 if Packet Pg. 224 s.c Ms. Simpson recused herself from this item due to a conflict. Staff Report Ms. Bzdek presented the staff report, reviewing the proposal and describing the surrounding historic properties. She displayed 3D modeling images prepared by Planning staff. She explained that this is an opportunity for the Commission to provide comments, but no formal recommendation will be made at this time. licant Presentation Mr. Hosanna, Neenan Archistruction, gave the Applicant presentation. He addressed the Commission's concerns about the variation in height between the proposed development and the surrounding buildings. He pointed out the patterns in height around downtown and noted there are drastic height differences in the area. Additionally, he stated the proposed fence for the roof -top dog park will be 6 feet in height, which is not taller than the required mechanical screening elements. Mr. Hosanna discussed downtown streetscapes and explained the changes made to the building in mass and materials to address the Commission's questions about how it relates to the Frozen Food building. He also pointed out how they brought the panels to the ground to satisfy the Commission's concerns. He talked about the changes to the windows that are meant to reference the Frozen Food building, and discussed the articulation and material variation used in the design to respond to Mr. Hogestad's comments at the previous Conceptual Review. He said the Planning Department had asked them to increase the articulation at the ground level and discussed the purpose of the vertical elements on the south elevation. Public Input None. Commission Questions and Discussion Chair Dunn directed the Commission's attention to Section 3.4.7f and suggested the Commission members address topics in order. Section 1 — Height, Setback, Width Mr. Bello commented on the horizontal metal material under the glass on the Frozen Food side of the building and stated it addressed Mr. Hogestad's concerns about height. Mr. Murray stated that he didn't see how the height lines up and asked how the corner references the height of the Frozen Food building. Chair Dunn said that the horizontal elements are more related to 3.4.7f(2). She commented she doesn't see the reference to the height of the Frozen Food building and said there is still a very abrupt step in height. She pointed out the step back on the Bohemian building as an example. Mr. Hosanna said he doesn't have the flexibility in the floorplan to accommodate a stepback. He commented that he is having difficulty figuring out how to navigate the height issue and stated the interior layout is driving the exterior design. Mr. Bello asked if the balconies are required. Mr. Hosanna replied they are necessary for the target clientele. Mr. Bello suggested a possible solution regarding the balconies to relate to the height and width of the Frozen Food building. Ms. Dorn commented that it is difficult to make the horizontal band under the windows relate to the Frozen Food building at its height and location. Chair Dunn stated Commission members are struggling with the height and width of the east side and requested input on the north elevation. Ms. Dorn asked about the large vertical element on the north side. Mr. Hosanna replied it started as a downspout to feed the planter box below and has since become a design feature. Ms. Dorn commented it could possibly emphasize the height of the corner. City of Fort Collins Page 2 May 16, 2018 W W z W 2 a O J W w 0 J Q z LL z z D O 2 FM Cn Q W 0 Packet Pg. 225 6.c Section 2 — Window Patterns, Primary Entrance, etc. Mr. Murray commented on the importance of not overwhelming the view into historic downtown and stated the fourth story causes issues with that aspect. He noted Mr. Hogestad had suggested making the building corner a statement. Mr. Hosanna replied corners can be overdone and stated this corner is a statement for this time period. W Chair Dunn commented on the corners of the Bohemian building, the Northern Hotel, and other > buildings which have corners that read as entrances but do not actually function as entries. W W Ms. Dorn asked about the window pattern matching that of the Frozen Food building. Mr. Hosanna z replied the proposed building uses part of the patterning, but in a subtler way. LU Ms. Dorn asked if the height and width of the windows match. Ms. Hosanna replied they are quite (L close. Ms. Dorn suggested possibly incorporating them in an aligning manner. Mr. Hosanna replied w the widths do not match and it would be difficult to align them due to floor heights. > W Chair Dunn appreciated the glass block elements. J Ms. Gensmer asked if the glass block bands are also offset. Mr. Hosanna replied they are closer to Z the same height as the Frozen Food building. Chair Dunn suggested that may be a good way to keep E: the horizontal line connection. z Section 3 — Material Distribution Mr. Bello asked if Mr. Hosanna considered using any white material to reference the Frozen Food o building. Mr. Hosanna replied in the negative and asked if a white canopy would help. He stated there 0 is more reference to the house next door. FM Cn Mr. Murray commented on the size of the material and stated the flatter surface of the rainscreen w references the Frozen Food building. N Ms. Dorn asked about material samples. Mr. Hosanna described the materials and stated he would N bring samples at the next review. TM 0 Chair Dunn commented the materials used on the Frozen Food building are unique to this part of town, and replicating them may not necessarily be desirable. Ms. Bzdek explained the material distribution = is based on all surrounding buildings and the Code allows for a variety of materials. Chair Dunn and Mr. Bello wondered whether they can specify that because the Frozen Foods building o is so unique, they can disregard it in their evaluation of the distribution of materials. Chair Dunn 2 requested staff examine the appropriate language prior to the next meeting. W TOM cm Section 4 — Visual and Pedestrian Connections, etc. N No specific comments were offered on this section. a Section 5 — Landscaping, etc. L) X Mr. Hosanna stated the only landscaping is the existing trees. W General Commission Comments and Questions Ms. Dorn asked about the dimensions of the rain screen panel. Mr. Hosanna replied it is 18 by 6 feet. Chair Dunn stated the Commission members are still struggling with building height and width. She ao asked how the members feel about the windows. Mr. Murray replied the windows work proportionally with the Frozen Food building. Ms. Dorn stated it would be interesting to see the windows referencing N the Frozen Food building on the 2nd floor. Mr. Hosanna asked if the design must reference the Frozen Food building or if other buildings in the area of adjacency can be considered. Mr. Murray replied the building next door requires more v emphasis. Mr. Hosanna stated he will look at window changes. He stated he will not be able to attend the next meeting and will send a colleague. He requested input from Commission members as to how close they feel the design is to being acceptable. E Ms. Gensmer stated she remains concerned about the building height and mass. �a Mr. Bello stated the changes discussed should help and he is struggling with the requirement to Q reference the Frozen Food building. City of Fort Collins Page 3 May 16, 2018 Packet Pg. 226 s.c Ms. Dorn stated the change in height is going to be a challenge. Mr. Murray stated he is not as worried about the corner, and stated the panels copy the stucco more than anything else could. He stated the height and width can be addressed proportionally, and this does that. He added he would like to see the fourth story step back, although he realizes that is not viable. Chair Dunn stated she is in support of the materials; however, she expressed concern this building does not defer to the historic building next door. ***END EXCERPT*** Minutes prepared by Tara Lehman, Tripoint Data. City of Fort Collin Page 4 May 16, 2018 W W Z W 2 a O J W w 0 J Q Z Z H Z D O 2 H Cn Q W MOM ff TOM N N H a W U X W TOM O N O TOM a J _ N t V Q Packet Pg. 227 ITEM 67 7/13/16 LPC MINUTES EXCERPT Ron Sladek, Chair Doug Ernest, Vice Chair Meg Dunn Bud Frick Kristin Gensmer Per Hogestad Dave Lingle Alexandra Wallace Belinda Zink City Council Chambers City Hall West 300 Laporte Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado Cablecast on FCTV Channel 14 and 881 (HD) on the Comcast cable system The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. Regular Meeting July 13, 2016 Minutes - Excerpt for 221 E. Mountain • CALL TO ORDER Chair Sladek called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. • ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dunn, Zink, Hogestad, Wallace, Gensmer, Lingle, Sladek ABSENT: Ernest, Frick STAFF: McWilliams, Yatabe, Schiager ***BEGIN EXCERPT*** 4. 221 EAST MOUNTAIN AVENUE - PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW & REQUEST FOR RECOMMENDATION TO DECISION MAKER PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposal to construct an approximately 65,000 square foot, four- story building at the southwest corner of East Mountain Avenue and Mathews Street. The project is adjacent to several designated and individually eligible buildings, including the Old Town District. The development proposal (PDP160011) will be subject to Basic Development Review. APPLICANT: Jason Messaros, BHA Design, 1603 Oakridge Dr., Fort Collins Ms. Zink, Chair Sladek and Ms. Dunn disclosed having participated in the Design Review. City of Fort Collins Page 1 July 13, 2016 Packet Pg. 227-1 ITEM 67 7/13/16 LPC MINUTES EXCERPT Staff Report Ms. McWilliams presented the staff report noting this review process considers the impact of the proposed development on historic resources within a defined area of adjacency. An existing vacant brick building on the property has been found to not be individually eligible. Staff has found the proposed project to be substantially in compliance with Land Use Code Section 3.4.7. Applicant Presentation Mark Melchi, MAVD, gave the Applicant presentation and showed slides of the proposed project. Public Input None Commission Questions and Discussion Mr. Hogestad requested information about the stone veneer materials. Mr. Melchi replied the corner elements are planned to be local stone; however, a final selection has not been made. It will be similar to the elements of the Bohemian building. Mr. Hogestad complimented the proposed building and stated it works well within the historic context in terms of the modulation, materials, window patterning and the finer details. Ms. Dunn complimented the proposed building as fitting appropriately in the Old Town area, and expressed appreciation for the way the Applicant incorporated the Commission's earlier comments into the design. Ms. Zink stated the new design is excellent and includes thoughtful improvements. She appreciated the recess of the fourth floor. Ms. Dunn complimented the way in which the corner is accented. Chair Sladek commended the elegant design stating it reflects the modern yet historic aesthetic and fits into the historic environment in a way that complies with 3.4.7. Commission Deliberation Mr. Hogestad moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission waive conceptual review and move directly to final review. Ms. Dunn seconded. The motion passed 7:0. Mr. Hogestad asked about the color on the west elevation. Mr. Melchi replied they were asked by the DDA to place a hard surface material on the first floor for durability. The elevation drawing is the current plan. The Commission discussed the recommended area of adjacency. Ms. Zink moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission adopt the area of adjacency listed in the staff report for the project at 221 E. Mountain Ave. Ms. Gensmer seconded. The motion passed 7:0. Mr. Hogestad moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission adopt a resolution recommending to the Decision Maker the approval of the development proposal located at 221 East Mountain Avenue as presented at the July 13, 2016 meeting of the Commission, finding that the project is in compliance with Land Use Code 3.4.7 and does not adversely affect the historic integrity of the area of adjacency. The Commission further finds that the project design uses traditional proportions and historic modules typically found in the surrounding historic context; uses massing and appropriate step backs to mitigate heights that are relative to the historic context; uses compatible solid to void window patterns; uses historically scaled materials; uses similar pedestrian scale to that of the area of adjacency; uses material choices to reduce mass. If the design changes substantially, the project would come back to the Commission. Ms. Zink seconded. The motion passed 7:0. ***END EXCERPT*** City of Fort Collins Page 2 July 13, 2016 Packet Pg. 227-2 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO THE ULTIMATE CLIP Qeeair.e; n hidrr.n caster bvl el,rnina.es Pace fast{ is upiet a-ld easy and of sper.i,Iry' xi,Hrnntrar.+.rxs PAIC1 1HA ARCNITECTt. WALL PANELS -irc Lghtweo- gh �, i3asv w agailabl a in a v;nually e paleLLe and a dir&rdc a 2cxwral f•nishss. Nichiha Wall Panel Information ■ NICHIHNS JOINT TA13 ATTACHMENT is designed In sL port panel a l 51s7hilrly, helping ti+gr,irrn ,�l jQ;$statp y u4 Lightly clamed - The Lab Gts io glace LL331 y and is fastened to tr-r V-rimiew Clip MH muided wew. of - iSRAINEb AND6ACk VENTILATED RAMSCREEN L%4 sign allnws avatar to 12 .,CQ xr and air to c,rcul a%. reducing The risk & mold ernd ia'ar Gamaga irisi ie the building THE 411.73MATE STARTER TRACK ".Is cicusle-duty IT ewsuies d fas[, leruel instillation and its pals:-iLed drainage rhannr.l di.arts watr r out and away 4 from th.e base of she *all Packet Pg. 227-3 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO r ARCHITECTURAL WALL PANELS AWP-1818, AWP-3030 MAY 2018 NICHIHA Horizontal Installation Guide fiber cement Packet Pg. 227-4 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO AWP-1818, 3030 HORIZONTAL INSTALLATION GUIDE GENERAL TABLE OF CONTENTS This guide is intended to provide the key BASICS 3 information needed to successfully install Limitations, Technical Reviews, Special Apps. 4 Nichiha's 1818mm and 3030mm Architectural Safety 4 Wall Panels (AWP-1818, AWP-3030) in a Framing & Sheathing 5 horizontal orientation. Further installation Continuous Insulation 6 information and technical resources such Weather Resistive Barriers 8 as animated instructional videos, Technical Storage & Handling 8 Bulletins, three-part specifications, product Fasteners 9 testing and certifications, architectural details HARDWARE &ACCESSORIES 10 in AutoCAD, Revit, and PDF versions, and other PLANNING & LAYOUT 12 technical documents are available INSTALLING THE STARTER TRACK 13 on our website: nichiha.com/resources. Panels Below Starter & Sloped Grade 14 Large Openings 15 Install products in accordance with the latest GENERAL PANEL & ACCESSORY BASICS 16 installation guidelines and all applicable Panel Selection 16 building codes and other laws, rules, Sealing Cut Panel Edges 16 regulations, and ordinances. Review all Cutting Ultimate Clips 17 installation instructions and other applicable Face Fastening 17 product documents before installation. This Finish Clip Usage 18 install guide's effective date is May 2018. Sealant 19 Sealant Joints/Caulking 19 AWP-1818 INSTALLATION 20 AWP-3030INSTALLATION 24 PRODUCT INSPECTION CORNERS & OPENINGS 27 Inspect all products thoroughly prior to Inside Corners 27 installation. Do not install any product which Window Sills 28 may have been damaged in shipment or Window/Door Jambs 29 appears to have a damaged or irregular finish. Window/Door Headers 30 Should you have a question or problem with Outside Corners 30 your order, contact your local dealer or Nichiha VERTICAL CONTROL/EXPANSION JOINTS 34 Customer Service, toll -free, at 1.866.424.4421. HORIZONTAL/COMPRESSION JOINTS 35 Keep the products dry prior to installation. It is PENETRATIONS, RAILINGS, & SIGNAGE 36 best to store the products indoors. LAST COURSE 36 GABLE & OVERHANG 37 Cleaning Panels 38 Paint Touch -Up 38 Removal of Exterior Acrylic Latex Paint 38 Other Paint & Graffiti Removal 38 Repairing Minor Damage 39 Panel Replacement 40 Packet Pg. 227-5 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO BASICS OF THE AWP SYSTEM Nichiha AWP-1818 dimensions are 455 (h) x 1,818 (1) x 16, 18, or 21 mm (t). AWP-3030 dimensions are 455 (h) x 3,030 (1) x 16 mm (t). It is important to keep in mind the actual metric dimensions when considering panel layout, placement of control and compression joints, and with respect to sizing window and door openings. Imperial equivalent dimensions for AWP-1818 are 17-7/8 inches (h) x 71-9/16 (1) x 5/8, 3/4 or 7/8 inch (t). AWP-3030 are 17-7/8 inches (h) x 119-5/16 (1) x 5/8 (t). Panel edges are shiplapped and a factory sealant 3030mm panels are shiplapped on the top and bottom edges only, with the top edge including a sealant gasket. AWP attachment hardware engages the top and bottom panel edges, holding panels off the substrate surface by 10mm (~3/8") and creating a closed -joint, drained/back-ventilated rainscreen system with concealed fastening. For the overall thickness of the AWP system, add this 10mm to the thickness of the panel (16, 18, or 21 mm) for a total system depth of 261 28, or 31 mm. gasket is included on the top and right edges of AWP-1818. When the panels fit together, all factory AWP-1818 must only be installed horizontally. AWP-3030 joints are sealed. may be installed horizontally or vertically. Refer also to the AWP-3030 Vertical Install Guide. AWP-1818 top shiplap 16 mm 71-9116" W x 17-718" H (with sealant gasket) AWP-3030 WIDTH: 119-5116 " top shiplap (with sealant gasket) flat vertical edges (with sealant gasket) 455 mm 4 e 455 mm $ (�17-7/8") Dimensions are measured from the edges of the panel face, which includes the left (AWP-1818 only) and bottom shiplaps (all panels). Packet*T. s22736 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO LIMITATIONS, TECHNICAL REVIEWS & SPECIAL APPLICATIONS Natural limitations on product usage are inherent to any cladding product's design, physical characteristics, and attachment system. Nichiha AWP are intended as a low -to -mid -rise cladding product. Any project of more than three stories or 45 feet, as well as those located in high wind coastal areas (Exposure Categories C and D with Basic Wind Speed in excess of 130 mph), or those with any wall assembly not described in Framing & Sheathing Requirements, require a technical review by Nichiha to evaluate feasibility via our Technical Review and Special Application Form (SAF) process. By evaluating a project's unique criteria and design, we can reference independently test -derived and calculated wind load performance data for our products to determine whether and how the panels can safely be installed on the project. Contact your local rep or Nichiha technical department for details or to initiate an SAF. AWP are not to be used in any applications/uses not specified or described in this installation guide or other Nichiha technical documents. Any such use shall not be backed by the manufacturer's product warranty. Do not use AWP on open screen walls or Insulated Concrete Forms (ICFs). Installation of AWP products on modular structures that are factory - constructed and then transported to a final site are not approved; and further, excluded from the Limited Product Warranty, per Section 2.F. Please contact Nichiha Technical Services for assistance. SAFETY As with any natural stone, masonry, or concrete based product, when cutting, drilling, sawing, sanding, or abrading fiber cement cladding, proper safety measures must be taken due to the potential for airborne silica dust, an OSHA -identified hazardous substance that can pose serious medical risks. Always wear safety glasses and a NIOSH/OSHA approved respirator with a rating of N, O, or P 100. Carefully follow the respirator manufacturer's instructions as well as applicable governmental safety regulations concerning silica. Refer to Nichiha's SIDS for more information. Always cut fiber cement panels outside and with a dust -collecting HEPA vacuum system. Do not cut the products in an enclosed area. Use a dust -reducing circular saw with diamond -tipped or carbide -tipped fiber cement saw blades. Always clean panels after cutting. Fiber cement dust can potentially bind to the panel finish. 4 BASICS Packet Pg. 227-7 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO FRAMING & SHEATHING REQUIREMENTS Prior to Nichiha installation, closely inspect the exterior wall substrate and correct any problems. Walls that are out of plumb, for example, can negatively impact the installation quality of AWP. Nichiha Spacer may be used in conjunction with panel attachment hardware if necessary to ensure an even substrate. Nichiha AWP cladding may be installed on flat, vertical walls only. No curves, tilted/sloped walls, soffits, or ceilings. Wood or steel framing, concrete/ masonry with furring, Structural Insulating Panels (SIP), and pre-engineered metal buildings (PEMB) must meet the following requirements: Refer to PEI-PER 14088 for wind load data. WOOD STUDS Size: minimum 2x4 studs Spacing: 16" o.c. max Sheathing: exterior grade minimum 7/16" plywood/OSB (APA rated),'/2" or 5/8" gypsum METAL STUDS Gauge: minimum 18 Spacing: 16" o.c max Sheathing: exterior grade minimum 7/16" plywood/OSB (APA rated),'/2" or 5/8" gypsum CONCRETE/MASONRY Furring is required for installation of AWP over concrete and masonry structures. Wood Furring: pressure treated lumber 2x4, oriented vertically, spaced 16" o.c. max Metal Furring: hat channel, c-stud, or z-furring, minimum 18 gauge, oriented vertically, spaced 16" o.c. max STRUCTURAL INSULATING PANELS (SIP) SIPS should be installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and local building codes. Additional special Nichiha installation requirements for SIPs are discussed in the Fasteners and Panel Installation sections to follow. For installations taller than one story, contact the Technical Department for assistance. PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDINGS (PEMB) Metal buildings must be new construction. No retrofits/remodels. Limit the metal siding/skin deflection to L/120. 50 ksi metal panels must have ribs spaced no more than 12" O.C. with metal gauge determined by allowable wind design pressures: METAL PANEL GAUGE ALLOWABLE PRESSURE 24 gauge -31.41 psf 22 gauge -39.29 psf Projects with allowable design pressures in excess of the table values may not utilize AWP directly over PEMB metal panels. Additional special installation requirements for PEMBs are discussed in the Fasteners, Installing the Starter Track, and Panel Installation sections to follow. Packet*T. s227,"8 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO CONTINUOUS INSULATION Where exterior/continuous insulation is used, AWP may be installed directly over up to 1" of foam plastic insulation on wood or gypsum sheathing. For such applications, a minimum compressive strength of 25 psi insulation is highly recommended. Thicker insulations require a structural solution to provide attachment points for AWP such as a furring grid or third -party specialized system. Mineral wool c.i. of any thickness requires a furring. Also refer to the Technical Bulletin: Continuous Insulation and AWP available at nichiha.com/resources/technical-bulletins. Please contact the Nichiha technical department for further assistance. AWP OVER C.I. ATTACHMENT REQUIREMENTS When adding a furring grid* to enable AWP installation over c.i., the following general criteria are applicable: AWP-1818 and AWP-3030 Horizontal Applications 1. Shaped metal furrings (Z, hat channel, C, etc.) • Minimum 18 gauge • Aligned vertically • Spaced 16" o.c. (max) -or- 2. Pressure treated lumber (Do not use strips of wood sheathing as furring.) • Minimum 2x (1.5") thickness • Aligned vertically • Spaced 16" o.c. (max) Wei= 3. A combination of horizontal (spaced per engineer's design) with a second, outermost layer of vertical furring (16" o.c.) *Consult a structural engineer to design the furring system to manage the AWP system dead load of minimum 4 psf and also meet the project wind load design criteria. Furring must account for expected building compression. Nichiha does not provide fastener design for anchoring the furring to structure. Refer to IBC 2015 Table 2603.12.2 for more info. Vertical furring @ 16" o.c. (max) Ultimate Clip at horizontal joint Section views: AWP System on vertical furring Vertical furring @ 16" o.c. (max Ultimate Horizontal Starter Track N u L Nichiha Panel U Ultimate Clip Metal 18 gauge (min.) hat channel, z or c furring @16" O.G. Plan view: AWP System on vertical furring 6 BASICS Packet Pg. 227-9 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO /_1401��E91: OT1%aL_Ce]:I►Vi1:110111IR Nichiha Double and Single Flange Sealant Backers and metal trims, such as H-Mold and Corner Key, must be fastened to furring, blocking, or 18 gauge flat stock. Sealant backers must be fastened every 12-14" vertically, so any use of flat stock must accommodate this fastening schedule. Outside corners may be wrapped with 18 gauge flat stock fabricated to fit the corner. Attach the stock to furring on both sides of the corner. Corner Clips are used to secure Nichiha factory panel Corners and may be fastened to the flat stock wrapping, as can metal trim corners. The model building code for 2015 includes information in Chapter 26 about foam plastic insulation/sheathing and furring minimum fastening requirements. Table 2603.12.2 shows various configurations depending upon framing gauge and spacing, fastener size and spacing, thickness of insulation and cladding weight. As an example, according to the table, 3 inches is the maximum thickness of foam sheathing on which a furring can be added directly on top, spaced at 16" o.c. and fastened with #8 screws every 12"-16" (into 18 gauge wall framing), that can support a cladding weight of 3 psf. ENERGY CODE FRIENDLY MARKET OPTIONS A number of engineered third party systems exist that are designed to solve the conflicts between energy code compliance and the safe installation of exterior claddings over continuous insulation. Nichiha has direct experience with these products: 1. SMARTci GreenGirts 2. Knight Wall Cl" and HCI'" Systems 3. Bracket and rail systems: a. Cascadia Clips° b. Knight Wall MFI® ._ .._. _.__....._rr...,...... Packet P1.1227-31 0 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIERS A weather resistive barrier (WRB) is required when installing Nichiha panels over stud walls and SIPs. For CMU/concrete and PEMB assemblies, Nichiha defers to local code requirements. Use an approved WRB as defined by the 2015 IBC. Refer to local building codes. Fluid applied WRBs are acceptable. A permeable WRB is highly recommended when installing Nichiha panels for residential applications. A permeable WRB is required for all commercial applications. Sheathings and insulations with an integrated code -compliant WRB such as ZIP System® and DensElementTm are acceptable. All openings must have appropriate flashing to prevent moisture penetration. Follow manufacturer's guidelines and all local building codes. -Vol? iVp_u v� INVO ProIyro� j/ei VVek k � , k T�� TVVe ' TVA G ddd i ek 1 Tye tuuek STORAGE AND HANDLING AWP are a finished product and care must be taken to protect them against damage prior to and during installation. Panels must be stored flat and kept dry. Refer to storage information included on product pallets. Ensure panels are completely dry before installing. Panels MUST be carried on edge. Do not carry or lift panels flat. Improper handling may cause cracking or panel damage. Direct contact between the panels and the ground must be avoided at all times. It is necessary to keep panels clean during installation process. Cut the panels with the face down. Always clean panels with a hepa-filtered vacuum after cutting. dust can bind to the finish. When sidewalks are poured after awp installation, take steps to cover/protect panels near grade. Cement dried on AWP cannot be removed. F, BASICS Packet Pg. 227-11 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO FASTENERS ALL APPLICATIONS Fasteners must be corrosion resistant. Stainless steel or corrosion resistant screws such as hot -dipped zinc or ceramic coated are recommended. Comply with all local building codes for fastener requirements. Number 10, pan -head screws (HD .365") were used as clip fasteners for AWP wind load testing shown in PER-14088. The minimum size for clip, track fasteners is #8. Clip and track screws must have a pan, wafer, or hex type full head. Number 7 finish screws with a bugle or flat head (min. head diameter 0.255") are appropriate for face fastening locations. Fasteners must penetrate framing or furring per the minimum requirements below. Refer to the Face Fastening Best Practices section on page 17 for face fastening procedure. WOOD STUDS Fasteners must penetrate solid structure by a minimum of 1' METAL STUDS Screws must penetrate solid structure by a minimum of 1/2". Three threads are needed for effective grab. CONCRETE/ MASONRY Furring to Masonry: Fastener type, size, and spacing to be determined under direction of an engineer and in accordance with local building codes. AWP to Furring: Screws must penetrate wood furring a minimum of 1 " or steel by'/z". STRUCTURAL INSULATING PANELS (SIP) One inch, full -thread, corrosion resistant wood screws must be used. Fasten starter track every 16" max. Double fastening per each Nichiha Ultimate Clip (minimum of 4 screws per clip) is required as there are fewer or no studs to secure the system. PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDINGS (PEMB) The PEMB wind load/panel gauge table (see Framing & Sheathing Requirements) is contingent upon use of #10-16 x 1 " pan head, S/D screws. Fasteners must be spaced at no more than 12" o.c. into metal panel ribs. Packet Pg.1027-12 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO INSTALLATION HARDWARE & ACCESSORIES ULTIMATE HORIZONTAL STARTER TRACK Horizontal Starter Track serves as the foundational support for the AWP system while also providing faster and greater ease of installation. Horizontal Panels: Starter Track FA 700 ULTIMATE CLIP II Ultimate Clips sit on the panel shiplaps, securing AWP to the wall and distributing dead loads to the structure. Together, Ultimate Clips and Starter Track hold the back surface of the panels off the substrate to create a 10mm (3/8") rainscreen space. JEL 778 CLIP Compatible with 16mm (5/8") AWP JEL 788 CLIP Compatible with 18 & 21 mm (3/4" & 7/8") AWP Joint Tab Attachments are included with Ultimate Clips and must be secured within a clip at the bottom of each AWP-1818 vertical joint to support panel lateral stability. Fasteners are included for use with the Joint Attachments only. CORNER CLIP Corner Clips sit on the shiplaps of Nichiha Corners, securing them to the wall and supporting their weight in cooperation with Starter Track, JE 777C Compatible with 16mm (5/8") Corners JE 787C Compatible with 18 & 21mm (3/4" & 7/8") Corners FINISH CLIP (OPTIONAL) The Finish Clip provides an alternative to face fastening of AWP at certain termination points where the panel shiplaps are removed. Install over 5mm Spacer. Refer to Finish Clip Usage section for general instructions. JE 310 FINISH CLIP — Compatible with all AWP CORRUGATED SPACER At termination points where Panel Clips cannot be used, Nichiha Corrugated Spacer is required to maintain the rainscreen space and prevent panel deflection at face fastening locations such as window sills and headers. FS 1010 SPACER — 10mm FS 1005 SPACER - 5mm 10 HARDWARE & ACCESSORIES Packet Pg. 227-13 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO SEALANT BACKERS Nichiha Sealant Backers provide exact spacing for expansion and termination joints and the recommended depth of sealant (75-80%). They provide faster installation than a foam backer rod and require less sealant. At sealant joints, use a sealant that complies with ASTM C920, Class 35 (min.). Refer to the Sealant section on page 19 for more information. Single Flange Sealant Backer: FHK 1015 - 10 mm Double Flange Sealant Backer: FH 1015 - 10 mm NICHIHA CORNERS Nichiha Corners are manufactured mitered panel corners available in the same finishes as all horizontally oriented AWP. Corners have 3-1/2" returns (face dimension). METAL TRIM OPTIONS Nichiha metal trim provides aesthetically pleasing design options for corners, openings, and transitions, as well as vertical joints. TRIM** Corner Key H-Mold Open Outside Corner J-Mold Inside Corner*** APPLICATIONS Outside Corners Vertical Joints - AWP-3030 Outside Corners Terminations Inside Corners ** These trims are only compatible with 16mm thick panels. *** Coming Fall 2018. ESSENTIAL FLASHING SYSTEM Starter* Compression Joint Overhang* * Inside and outside corner segments are available. APPLICATIONS Base/Clearance Concealment Horizontal/Compression Joints Fascia -to -Soffit Transitions -10 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO PLANNING & PANEL LAYOUT To ensure a successful installation, it is important to first plan how the panels will be laid out, where compression and control joints will be located, and line of sight regarding inside corners decided Reminder: AWP actual dimensions are metric: 455mm (h) x 1,818mm or 3030mm (1). Imperial equivalents: 17-7/8" (h) x 71-9/16" or 119-5/16" (1). LAYOUTS AWP-1818 can be installed in a stacked bond or a staggered bond application. Refer to the illustrations on Page 22. AWP-3030 must only be installed with a stacked bond layout. AWP-3030 may not be staggered. See the layout illustration on page 26. VERTICAL CONTROL/EXPANSION JOINTS (PAGE 34) 10mm (3/8") sealant joints account for thermal expansion in the lateral dimension. These are often, where possible, aligned with window or door jambs, downspouts, or other features in order to minimize their appearance. Depending on sheathing type, additional framing, furring, or blocking may be required. I11 HORIZONTAL/COMPRESSION JOINTS (PAGE 35) 1/2" (min.) horizontal, flashed break detail to allow for building compression at floor lines. INSIDE CORNER LINE OF SIGHT (PAGE 27) Sealant joints at inside corners can be placed out of view from the primary line of sight of a wall. Place the sealant joint on the less -viewed corner wall. Alternatively, Inside Corner metal trim may be used. CUT PANELS In general, it is best to avoid cutting AWP to short or narrow strips and segments of less than 9". Specifically, when an individual panel is wider than a window or other opening and is used over the head or under the sill, do not cut it to less than 9" in height. (image A) When an opening is wider than an individual panel and two or more are needed to cap over the header or cup the sill, do not cut the panel to less than 4" in height. (image B) 12 PLANNING & LAYOUT Packet Pg. 227-15 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO HORIZONTAL AWP: INSTALLING THE HORIZONTAL ULTIMATE STARTER TRACK MINIMUM CLEARANCES The Horizontal Ultimate Starter Track must be level and attached at a minimum of 6" above finished soil grade or per local building codes (use a laser level to verify). When installing over a hard surface such as driveways or sidewalks, a 2" clearance is acceptable. Keep AWP at least 1 if above roofs. The AWP bottom face edge will extend 3/a" below the Starter Track. Essential Starter Flashing may be installed prior to the Starter Track to conceal the clearance gap above hard scape and decking. Beginning with outside and inside corner segments, fasten Flashing at each stud location or every 10" o.c. to sill plate. Fasten Flashing inside and outside corner segments to framing on both sides, keeping at least 1" from vertical edges. Main segments will slide into/overlap the corner segments. Position Flashing and/or Starter Track to leave 1/4" clearance between the panel edge and Flashing. This is also true for horizontal transitions to other claddings/finishes. FASTENING The Starter Track must be installed using corrosion resistant fasteners. Locate and mark the studs. WOOD & METAL STUDS OR FURRING Starter Track must be secured at every stud line. Max. 16" o.c. CONCRETE/MASONRY When installing over concrete construction, the wall must be furred out with pressure treated lumber or metal hat channel. Starter Track must be secured at each furring location. Max. 16" o.c. STRUCTURAL INSULATING PANELS (SIP) Secure Starter Track every 16" o.c. max. PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDINGS (PEMB) Fasten Starter Track at every metal panel rib at 12" o.c. max. INSTALLINq;y46kL:ftRRgA(227116 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO Starter Track PANELS BELOW STARTER TRACK When panel layouts necessitate a partial panel at the bottom of the wall, it is best to add the cut panel below the Starter Track course. This also true for sloped grade conditions. Begin with Starter Track at lowest possible continual level line and install it as directed in this guide. To clad below Starter Track: Add FS1010 Spacer below the Starter Track and at the termination point at the wall base. Cut the bottom edge of the partial panel. Insert the top shiplap under the Starter Track. This will form the appearance of a regular horizontal joint with the bottom shiplap of the panel on the Starter Track. Face fasten the bottom edge of the panel, one inch up from the cut edge. Also face fasten the top edge of this panel as shown in the drawing. SLOPED GRADE & MULTIPLE PANEL COURSES Below the Starter, if installing more than one course of panels, install the full-sized course up under the Starter and fasten upside-down Panel Clips underneath, with every framing/furring member covered by a clip. Face fasten the top edge of the fill-in panel through corrugated Spacer. Keep fasteners 1 " from panel edges. Add the next course and fasten upside-down clips unless that panel course is the final/terminal, cut/ scribed one. Face -fasten the bottom/cut course with backing corrugated Spacer. Face fasteners through Spacer Cut, fill-in panel below Starter Track Maintain minimum clearances above grade: 2" above hardscape, 6" above soil. Paint, prime, or otherwise seal all cut, exposed panel edges. Clean panels after cutting with a clean, dry cloth to remove dust. If installing over a masonry/CMU foundation, furring is required. This should be taken into consideration when planning the depth of the exterior wall and cladding above so that the entire wall will have a uniform depth. 14 INSTALLING STARTER TRACK Packet Pg. 227-17 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO STARTER TRACK ABOVE LARGE OPENINGS Large openings (full panel width or wider) such as storefront windows or garages should be taken into account with respect to Starter Track placement. Utilize Starter Track above these large openings to best support the weight of the panels above and for ease of installation. Install Starter Track above the opening with the normal procedure. Also refer to Window/Door Headers. Establish a level line from the bottom of the header Starter Track out to the side on both ends with a laser level. Use this line to measure down the wall (each side of the large opening) to attach the wall base Starter Track so that the panels will meet at the proper height with respect to the head of the large opening. Use the Panels Below Starter Track procedure for adding fill-in panels below the wall base Starter Track(s). Cut, fill-in panels below Starter Track with sloping grade evel line - measure down from here to place lower Starter Track Starter Track 1" above garage door casing Starter Corrugated S Make strategic use of Starter Track above and flanking large openings to course and align horizontal joints of AWP. Reminders: all AWP are 17-718" (455mm) tall and the bottom shiplap edge extends 314" below Starter Track. I NSTALLI N(PffBkeftRRgA(QQ711 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO GENERAL PANEL & ACCESSORY BASICS All trim, Single and Double Flange Sealant Backer should be installed before panels. Refer to Inside Corners, Doors, & Windows and Vertical Expansion Joints sections respectively. PANEL SELECTION Nichiha AWP are packaged with two panels in a pack, which are placed on pallets consisting of two stacks. Due to alternating patterns of texture and color between individual panels as well as how the panels are manufactured and packaged, it is best to install all panels from each individual stack before taking and installing panels from the second stack on the same pallet. Do not alternate installing from one stack and the second, which may result in undesirable patterns. SEALING CUT PANEL EDGES When cutting AWP, it is best to cut with the panel face down, except when cutting brick finish panels as it is easier to follow the simulated mortar lines on their face. Cut and exposed panel edges must be primed or sealed with fiber cement sealer (e.g. DryLock@) or latex paint such as Kilz PremiumO or Kilz Max@. Do not use Illumination touch up paint for edge sealing as there will not be sufficient supply for larger projects. Be sure to clean panels with a clean, dry soft cloth after cutting to prevent dust from bonding to the finish. l 16 GENERAL PANEL & ACCESSORY BASICS Packet Pg. 227-19 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO CUTTING ULTIMATE CLIPS JEL778/788 Panel Clips are 26" long. Where full length clips can be used, they are required. However, there may be conditions where clips must be cut to accommodate panels or corner pieces in smaller areas or segments such as narrow columns, pilasters, or insets, recessed openings, or small areas between windows. Notches on the upward panel engagement flanges indicate where clips can be cut evenly into thirds. These 1/3 segments can be further reduced evenly into two or four pieces each with weep holes serving as dividing points. The smallest segment must include at least one downward panel engagement flange. Always use the widest clip segment possible. Cut with a non-ferrous saw blade on a band or chop saw. FACE FASTENING BEST PRACTICES To minimize the appearance of face fasteners, utilize the following steps: Apply low adhesive tape such as painters tape to the panel at face fastening locations. Pre -drill panels 1 " from the cut edge to be face fastened. Use a countersink drill bit with chamfer matching the head diameter of the bugle -head type screws to be used for face fastening. Fill counter -sunk fastener holes with exterior cementitious filler, such as MH Ready Patch® and later dab touch-up paint with cotton swabs or an artist brush. Remove the painter's tape only after applying the patch and touch up paint. ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO FINISH CLIP USAGE The Finish Clip requires added preparation of the panels with the use of a biscuit joiner: 1. To route grooves into the top edge of a panel, use a biscuit/plate joiner, such as Makita's PJ7000. A carbide blade is recommended. 2. Set the biscuit joiner's angle guide at zero degrees and height to 3. Set the depth of groove for a size 20 biscuit to ensure the grooves are wide and deep enough for JE310 clips to seat properly, 1/a" from the back/unfinished face of the panel. 4. Route the cut edge with the unfinished panel surface facing up, lining the grooves up with stud locations (16" o.c. maximum). 5. The clip should fit snug but not too tightly when placed on the panel. Cut, routed panel edges must be sealed with 100% acrylic latex primer or paint. Use 5mm Spacer with JE310 Finish Clips. 1„ 4 [6 mm] a Panel Front 1„ 2 12 mm] Panel Back 18 GENERAL PANEL & ACCESSORY BASICS Packet Pg. 227-21 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO SEALANT Sealants to be used with AWP must match the following requirements: • Comply with ASTM C920 • Have a Class of 35, 50, or 100/50 (minimum 35% joint movement) • Be a polyurethane, polyurethane hybrid, or Adfast Adseal 4580 • Provide two-sided adhesion at joints OSI° QUAD® may not be used for Nichiha expansion joints • It is a class 25 product. • QUAD° MAX is acceptable since it is a Class 50 Refer to the Technical Bulletin: Sealants available at Nichiha.com/resources/technical-bulletins. �— 1 SEALANT JOINTS/CAULKING Fasten Single Flange Sealant Backers at inside corners (one wall at corner), along window and door jambs, and transition points with other cladding. Fasten to framing, blocking or plywood/OSB sheathing at 12-14" o.c. with the 3/8" bump/sealant portion butting the corner or jamb. Sealant complying with ASTM C920, Class 35 (min.) is required where Single and/or Double Flange Sealant Backer is used. Refer to the sealant manufacturer's instructions or requirements. Place low -adhesive tape (masking or painter's) over the panel along the areas requiring sealant joints for a clean caulk line. Fill the gap between the panels with a color- matched/coordinating sealant which complies with the ASTM C920, Class 35 (min.) standard. Nichiha Sealant Backers allow for the proper depth of sealant (75-80%). Before removing tape, press the surface of the sealant with a caulk spatula or similar tool to ensure an even surface. Remove masking tape before sealant cures. If excess sealant adheres to panel, remove completely using a putty knife or soft cloth. ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO AWP-1818 PANEL INSTALLATION AWP installation proceeds by working from left to right. WOOD, METAL, CONCRETE / MASONRY WITH FURRING For AWP-1818, trim off the left side ship -lapped edge so the panel will fit tightly against an already installed Inside Corner metal trim, Sealant Backer, or outside corner trim. If starting at an inside corner, predetermine which wall will include the Single Flange Sealant Backer for an inside corner detail. Consider the location to minimize the visibility of the sealant joint line. Clad the higher visibility wall without the sealant joint first so that the adjoining wall panels can terminate to it with the Single Flange Sealant Backer detail. Or use Inside Corner metal trim Set the first panel into the Starter Track and secure the top edge with a Panel Clip, placing the first clip about one inch from the left edge of the panel. Fasten the clip at each stud location the clip reaches. Every clip will cover 2-3 studs and must be fastened to each. (Figure 21-a,b) Proceed along the panel to the right, placing another clip 3-4 inches from the end of the previously installed clip so that the second clip is roughly centered over the panel middle but DO NOT skip any studs. Fasten clips at each stud location. Place the second panel next to the first, making sure the shiplap joint fits tightly together. A rubber mallet or block of wood may be used to seat the panels firmly in place and tighten to the left. Do not hammer directly anywhere on the panels as direct contact may cause cracks, gouges, or chipping. (Figure 21 c) Place a clip on top of this vertical joint. Vertical joints must be spanned with a clip covering the top edge of where the panels meet. Fasten the clip to each stud it reaches, again not skipping any studs. Each long panel edge should be supported by about 2.5 clips. (Figure 21 d) Verify the first course of panels is level. Large commercial buildings require checking level around the entire building. Start the second row in the same fashion as the first, but, in addition to the previous steps, add the Vertical Joint Tab Attachment against the bottom right hand corner of each panel. The Attachment seats inside the panel clip, with tabs that fit on clip Is rainscreen flange. Fasten the Attachment to the panel clip with the provided fastener. (Figure 21e) Fit panels tightly together on both horizontal and vertical joints, ensuring the panel edges are properly butted together. Complete the second and remaining non -terminal rows in the same way, with the Vertical Joint Tab Attachments at the base of each vertical joint. Terminal rows such as under Compression Joints or at the Last Course are covered in subsequent sections of this guide. 20 AWP-1818INSTALLATION Packet Pg. 227-23 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIRi-100 AWP-1818 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO STRUCTURAL INSULATING PANELS (SIP) In general, the steps mirror those for stud wall applications. However, double fastening per each panel clip (minimum of 4 screws per clip) is required as there are fewer or no studs to secure the system. There must be about 2.5 clips per AWP-1818 edge, with vertical joints spanned by Panel Clips and the Joint Tab Attachment seated in and fastened to the Panel Clip at the lower right corner of each panel. STACKED AND STAGGERED PANEL LAYOUTS AWP-1818 PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDINGS (PEMB) Refer again to general requirements concerning PEMB installations in the Framing and Sheathing Requirements section. With metal panel ribs spaced no more than 12" o.c., install AWP in the same manner as with stud wall applications but with Panel Clips fastened to each rib they reach. Screws (#10x1 ") applied at no more than 12" O.C. There must be about 2.5 clips per AWP-1818 edge, with vertical joints spanned by Panel Clips and the Joint Tab Attachment seated in and fastened to the clip at the lower right corner of each panel. CENTERLINE OF FRAMING MEMBER OR CHANNEL (SHOWN AT 16" O.C.) FACE FASTEN AT TOP CENTERLINE OF FRAMING MEMBER OR CHANNEL (SHOWN AT 16" O.C.) FACE FASTEN AT TOP p q q I I I I JOINT TAB TO BE INSTALLED TIGHTLY I AGAINST LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF PANEL JOINT TAB TO BE INSTALLED TIGHTLY - AGAINST LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER -- _ 1 I OF PANEL I I I I 4 4 1 I l 4 I I I I I I I I IY_rI�I�ZyV_l:�l� i1:7_CN9 FA 700 STARTER TRACK 22 AWP-1818INSTALLATION Packet Pg. 227-25 ,�. �T x elf° ♦ .` l: a� .r c Q.i •.`e f% ityl•'' � 7 L L M All 6LM w 1. .. 'eri�•?� - .. _. �__ •1M�aTe i a.i�+`MSiJ AWP-3030 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO AWP-3030 HORIZONTAL INSTALLATION AWP installation proceeds by working from left to right. AWP-3030 may only be installed in a stacked bond. Refer to layout illustration on page 26. WOOD, METAL, CONCRETE / MASONRY WITH FURRING For AWP-3030, the left and right panel edges are flat and do not require initial cutting. The panel will fit against an already installed Inside Corner metal trim, Sealant Backer, or outside corner trim. If starting at an inside corner, predetermine which wall will include the Single Flange Sealant Backer for an inside corner detail. Consider the location to minimize the visibility of the sealant joint line. Clad the higher visibility wall without the sealant joint first so that the adjoining wall panels can terminate to it with the Single Flange Sealant Backer detail. Or utilize Inside Corner metal trim. Set first panel into the Starter Track and secure the top edge with an Ultimate Clip, placing the first clip about one inch from the left edge of the panel. Fasten clip at each stud location the clip reaches. Every clip will cover 2-3 studs and must be fastened to each. (Figure 25a) Fasten the Double Flange Sealant Backer at vertical joints between panels. Fasten Sealant Backer on right side flange every 12-14" to framing, blocking, or plywood/OSB sheathing. Install the next panel right up to the Double Flange Sealant Backer and secure with clips at each stud location. (Figure 25c,d) Alternatively, H-Mold metal trim can be used at vertical joints for horizontal AWP-3030. This trim, as well as Nichiha Sealant Backer must be fastened to plywood/OSB sheathing, framing, furring, or blocking. Fasten metal trim every 12-16" in a staggered fashion on alternating flanges. For H-Mold, leave a no more than a 1/8" gap between the edge of the panel and the center flange of the trim. (Figure 25e) Verify the first course of panels is level. Large commercial buildings require checking level around the entire building. Complete the second and remaining non -terminal rows in the same way. Fit panels tightly together on horizontal joints, ensuring the panel edges are properly butted together. A rubber mallet or block of wood may be used to seat the panels firmly in place and tighten downward. The Joint Tab Attachments are not used with Proceed along the panel to the right, placing another AWP-3030. Terminal rows such as under Horizontal/ clip 3-4 inches from the end of the previously Compression Joints or at the Last Course are installed clip. DO NOT skip any studs. Fasten clips discussed in subsequent sections of this guide. at each stud location. Each AWP-3030 long edge must be covered by four clips. (Figure 25b) Since AWP-3030 do not have shiplaps on their short edges, a control joint or H-Mold trim detail is needed at each vertical joint. The vertical joint is continuous and not split up or staggered. 24 AWP-3030 INSTALLATION Packet Pg. 227-27 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICH'Ai -WO 1 FIG. 25E a H-Mold as the AWP-3030 vertical joint detail AWP-3030 ITEM 6, 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO STRUCTURAL INSULATING PANELS (SIP) In general, the steps mirror those for stud wall applications. However, double fastening per each Panel Clip (minimum of four screws, evenly spaced per clip) is required as there are fewer or no studs to secure the system. There must be four clips per AWP-3030 edge. STACKED PANEL LAYOUT ONLY - AWP-3030 AWP-3030 must be installed with continuous vertical joints. No panel staggering is permitted. (Figure 26) Mace fasteners 1" below top edge PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDINGS (PEMB) Refer again to general requirements concerning PEMB installations in the Framing and Sheathing Requirements section. With metal panel ribs spaced no more than 12" o.c., install AWP in the same manner as with stud wall applications but with Panel Clips fastened to each rib they reach. Screws (#10 x 1 ") applied at no more than 12" o.c. There must be four clips per AWP-3030 long edge. z-CONTINUOUS VERTICAL JOINT into framing / (H-MOLD TRIM OR DOUBLE FLANGE SEALANT BACKER) pzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzi �4 Clips per panel edge Starter Track --------------------------- ------------------------------ AWP-3030 HORIZONTAL CLIP AND PANEL LAYOUT - ELEVATION VIEW - STACKED BOND ONLY 26 AWP-3030INSTALLATION Packet Pg. 227-29 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO CORNERS & OPENINGS ALL APPLICATIONS Appropriate flashing and moisture management best practices must be used to prevent moisture penetration at all inside corners, doors, and windows. Refer to window/door manufacturer requirements and local building codes. Cut and exposed panel edges must be primed or sealed with fiber cement sealer or paint. INSIDE CORNERS SINGLE FLANGE SEALANT BACKER Decide the primary line of sight in order to minimize visibility of the sealant joint. Install the panel (ship -lapped edges at the joint will need to be cut off) on the front wall (more visible) first. Ensure these panels are butted up in moderate contact to the inside corner wall. Next, fasten the Single Flange Sealant Backer every 12-14" o.c., onto the side wall, right up against the front wall panel faces. Install the side wall panel directly against the sealant backer and secure with Panel Clips. Fill space with sealant. INSIDE CORNER METAL TRIM Install Nichiha Inside Corner metal trim directly against the inside corner sheathing. Fasten metal trim every 12-16" in a staggered fashion on alternating flanges. If installing AWP-1818, remove the shiplapped edges, treating the cuts, and install panels normally, butting to the Inside Corner trim in moderate contact. TRIM BOARDS Install trim boards at inside corner first and butt the flat panel edges to Single Flange Sealant Backer. Add ASTM C920, Class 35 (min.) compliant sealant to the gap. iluuu M I 3/8" SEALANT JOINT OVER SINGLE FLANGE SEALANT BACKER NICHIHA CLIP NICHIHA PANEL imu ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO WINDOW SILLS JE310 FINISH CLIP For recessed windows, add a flashing where the panels will terminate so the top edges are covered or capped at the sill. Remove the top ship -lapped edge of the panel at the window sill, cutting the panel to the required height, and route grooves into panel top at appropriate width to coincide with framing members. (Refer to Finish Clip Usage for biscuit joiner info.) Clean any dust off the panel. For windows narrower than a panel, only remove the portion of the panel edge directly under the window but accounting for a minimum 1/4" gap at both jambs. Cut, routed panel edges must be sealed with 100% acrylic latex primer or paint, such as Kilz Premium or Kilz Max. Panel edge should be spaced a minimum 3/8" below a flush or overhanging window sill to accommodate the Finish Clip. Fasten FS1005 Corrugated Spacer (5mm) at stud locations before setting panel into place. Seat Finish Clips into grooves and fasten at each stud location, through Spacer, to secure panel into place. If the top edge of the panel is fully sheltered under the sill, it is not necessary to seal the 3/8" gap. For better system performance, Nichiha recommends the vented approach. FINISH CLIP OVER 5MM SPACER FACE FASTENING (J-MOLD OPTIONAL) For recessed windows, add a flashing where the panels will terminate so that the top edges are covered or capped at the sill. As needed to match the window width, remove panel top ship -lapped edge, cutting the panel to the required height to fit below the window sill, leaving a 1/4" gap between the top of the cut panel edge and the window sill or trim board. Cut, routed panel edges must be sealed with 100% acrylic latex primer or paint, such as Kilz Premium or Kilz Max. Clean any dust off the panel with a clean, soft, dry cloth. Add FS1010 Corrugated Spacer (10mm) at stud locations, set the panel on the clips of the panel(s) below, and then face fasten top, cut edge of panel at the sill. Keep screws 1" below panel edge. This will avoid cracking or breaking the panel. A best practice is to pre -drill the panel before fastening. If the top edge of the panel is fully sheltered under the sill, it is not necessary to seal the 1/4" gap. For better system performance, Nichiha recommends the vented approach. J-Mold or other trim channels can be included at a sill but must be placed on the panel edge prior to face fastening the panel so that the trim is fastened simultaneously. 28 CORNERS & OPENINGS Packet Pg. 227-31 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO WINDOW / DOOR JAMBS A minimum gap of 1/4" is required when butting panels into windows, doors, and trim boards. Refer to window/door manufacturer guidelines for spacing trims around openings. SINGLE FLANGE SEALANT BACKER Install the Single Flange Sealant Backer first, butting to the door/window jamb or trim pieces prior to installing the panels. The Single Flange Sealant Backer must be fastened a minimum of 12" to 14" o.c. to studs, blocking, or structural sheathing. Cut panels to the appropriate width, at least removing ship -lapped edges. Remember to clean freshly cut panels with a soft, dry cloth. Install panels and fill gap with ASTM C920, Class 35 (min.) compliant sealant. Cin( /= Flom = gcnlnn+ Anr 11=r J-MOLD Pre -install J-Mold trim with a'/a" gap between it and the window/door jamb, or per window manufacturer instructions. Panels must fit completely within trim, with no exposed panel edges. Lastly, add closed -cell foam backer rod and sealant to the gap between the J-mold and jamb, if applicable. NICHIHA CORNERS AT RECESSED JAMBS Nichiha Corners can be used to wrap recessed window jambs. Corners have returns of 3-1/2" (face dimension). Cut the pieces as needed for shallower returns but it must be of sufficient depth for use of Corner Clips or a clip segment. Wrap the base of the jamb with cut pieces of Starter Track (or FS1010 Spacer if face fastening). Install Corner pieces at jamb prior to main panels using Corner Clips or cut Panel Clips (refer to Cutting Panel Clips section). Cut clips must retain at least one downward panel engagement flange. Install Single Flange Sealant Backer with the sealant bump against the Corner piece, fastening at 12' - 14" o.c. along the fastening flange. Where Corner pieces meet the termination point at the window, leave a minimum'/a" gap and add'/z" closed -cell backer rod and sealant. SEALANT BACKER """ III '^' ^" I ""' CORNER OVER CUT PANEL CLIPS ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO WINDOW/DOOR HEADERS STARTER TRACK When starting a course of whole panels above a window or door, add flashing and Horizontal Starter Track at the header, installed with fasteners at each framing member. Add flashing tape to seal flashing to the WRB. Refer to Starter Track Above Large Openings on page 15. Starter Track over Z-flashing FACE FASTENING When adding a cut panel above the opening, install flashing and corrugated Spacer first and then face fasten panels at each framing member. Add flashing tape to seal flashing to the WRB. Keep fasteners a min. 1" from edge. NICHIHA 10MM SPACER FACE FASTENER 1/4" CLEARANCE FROM EDGE OF PANEL TO FLASHING "Z" FLASHING BY OTHERS OUTSIDE CORNERS There are several Nichiha recommended outside corner installation options: • Nichiha Corners • Fiber Cement and PVC Trim Boards • Metal (Open Outside, Corner Key) and Vinyl Trim Appropriate flashing must be used as required to prevent moisture penetration on outside corners. NICHIHA CORNERS Install Nichiha Corners prior to panels. Corners may only be used in vertical applications. They may not wrap window heads and sills. Set a Corner on the Starter Track and secure with a Corner Clip. Fasten with screws into framing/structure on both sides of the Corner Clip. Place the next Corner on top of the first, fitting the ship -lapped edges together over the clips. Secure the top edge in the same manner with a Corner Clip. (Figure A, B) Continue up the outside corner, stacking and securing the Corner pieces. The top Corner will be cut to the appropriate height and face fastened over 10mm Spacer. Add Double Flange Sealant Backer at the Corners on both sides, all the way down from the top of the wall section to the Starter Track. Secure Sealant Backer to structure every 12-14" on the exposed fastening flanges. (Figure C) After all the panels have been installed, apply ASTM C920, Class 35 (min.) compliant sealant to the Sealant Backers, 30 CORNERS & OPENINGS Packet Pg. 227-33 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO 0 000 a; i 0 Double Flange Sealant Backer ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO FIBER CEMENT & PVC TRIM BOARDS Nichiha manufactures a full line of fiber cement trim boards - NichiTrim' , which are available in the Southeast U.S. Refer to Nichiha.com for more information. When panels are to be butted to fiber cement, wood or other trim pieces, use Nichiha Single Flange Sealant Backer between them. Apply sealant compliant with ASTM C920, Class 35 (min.). METAL & VINYL TRIM Install trim channels, such as Nichiha Corner Key or Open Outside Corner, manufactured by Tamlyn, prior to panels and fasten with corrosion resistant fasteners through trim flanges every 12-16" into studs or corner blocking. Stagger fasteners on alternating sides. Cut off terminal panel ship -lapped edges to fit panel into channel the trim so that edges are not exposed. Butt the flat panel edges in moderate contact to the center flange of the trim. With Corner Key trim, this will necessitate miter cutting the panel edges. Refer to Vertical Control/Expansion Joints. Nichiha metal trim pieces are each 10 feet in length. To cut metal trim, a non-ferrous carbide miter saw blade is appropriate. When butting/stacking metal trim pieces, add a bead of polyurethane sealant at the seam/joint. Metal trim can be pre -finished when purchased to match Illumination Series and some standard panel color(s). Otherwise, for field painting metal trim, use Direct to Metal (DTM) paint. See Tamlyn's XtremeTrim Painting Guide. lx. y ,,,,,, w , . u„ ..,"„ w ru,,.., .y 32 CORNERS & OPENINGS Packet Pg. 227-35 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO NON-90-DEGREE CORNERS Corners other than 90 degrees can be achieved with custom metal trim, butting panels to trim board with a minimum'/a" sealant gap, or with the use of Double Flange Sealant Backer (refer to Vertical Control/Expansion Joints) to set cut panel edges at the desired corner angle. Miter cut panel edges as needed to create uniform sealant joints. The Double Flange Sealant Backer detail can be utilized to accommodate use of AWP on segmented, radius -like walls. Do not attempt to curve AWP. Contact the Nichiha Technical Department for assistance. Non-90 corner utilizing modified Double Flange Sealant Backer and miter -cut panel edges. u ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO VERTICAL CONTROL/ EXPANSION JOINTS AWP-1818 When using metal trim outside corners, Vertical Control/Expansion Joints (Double Flange Sealant Backers) are required within 2-10 feet of both sides of outside corners and approximately every 30 feet thereafter. Projects using Nichiha Corners (see Figures A, B, and C on page 31) satisfy the 2-10 Rule but still require expansion joints roughly every 30 feet beyond the Corner joints. For example, a 60-foot wall with two outside corners would require three vertical control joints: one near each outside corner and one towards the center. Install Double Flange Sealant Backer to butt up against the panels at pre -determined locations and secure the joint to substrate on one side (the right side flange) at 12" - 14" o.c. Sealant Backers must be fastened to plywood/OSB sheathing, framing/furring members (added if necessary to pre -planned joint locations), or blocking. AWP-1818 17-7/8" edges must be cut, fully removing the shiplaps. H-Mold may not be used as a substitute for required AWP-1818 expansion joints. Add framing/blocking to fasten Sealant Backers as necessary i AWP-3030 Double Flange Sealant Backers or H-Mold trim (see pages 24, 25) are required between each AWP- 3030. The 455mm (17-7/8") edges of the panels are flat (without shiplaps) and may not be butted together. These vertical joints may not be split up or staggered. A stacked panel layout is required. SEALANT APPLICATION (1818 & 3030) Apply low -adhesive tape along the panel edges at Double Flange joints to protect panel finishes from sealant and for a smoother look when the sealant is applied and tape removed. Apply ASTM C920, Class 35 (min.) compliant sealant into the expansion joint, starting at the bottom and pushing sealant into the gap. Follow the contour of the panel edges so that the sealant depth always matches the face edge/depth of the panels. r .`+'ft�- e f 34 VERTICAL CONTROL / EXPANSION JOINTS Packet Pg. 227-37 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO HORIZONTAL/ COMPRESSION JOINTS Project designers must account for building compression when planning the cladding layout and incorporate horizontal/compression joints as appropriate. Nichiha is not liable for panel damage due to building compression. In general, Nichiha recommends such joints at each floor level. With metal framing projects of more than three stories or 45 feet, add a compression joint approximately every 25 feet, located at the floor line(s) nearest this distance. For wood framing projects of three stories or more, a joint is required at each floor. Locate compression joints at floor lines. Please contact the Nichiha Technical Department for assistance. INSTALLING A HORIZONTAL COMPRESSION JOINT Install Essential Compression Joint Flashing or a heavier gauge z-shaped metal flashing or drip cap over the top edge of the course of panels terminating under the horizontal compression joint location. Fasten Flashing at each stud location. A best practice is to add flashing tape to cover the top edge of the flashing and its fasteners. The top ship -lapped edge of the bottom panel is cut and secured by face fastening (1 " below panel cut edge) or use of the Finish Clip (JE310) with the appropriate Spacer behind: 10mm for face fastening, 5mm for Finish Clip. Install Starter Track above the flashing such that the next course of panels sit at least 1/2 inch above the course below. Remember the bottom ship -lapped edge of panels extend 3/4" below the Starter Track, so the Starter will need to be installed at least 1-1/4 if above the edge of the panel course below the joint. Check for level. Continue to install panels according to these guidelines with compression joints at the appropriate elevation(s). HORIZONTAL / cOMI#RA t FkgN227338 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO PENETRATIONS, RAILINGS, & SIGNAGE Openings for small penetrations for pipes or conduits may be cut through a panel and the hole sealed with ASTM C920 compliant sealant. For larger penetrations greater than 1.5", it is best to block or frame out the opening. Treat the penetration like a small window. Along the jambs of the opening install Single Flange Sealant Backer. Cut panel edges as needed to butt to Single Flange Sealant Backer and add recommended sealant. Underneath the opening block out, install FS1010 Spacer as needed for face fastening the top panel edge at framing locations. Terminate the panel with '/a" gap. Sealant here is optional, depending on the depth of the blocking. Above the penetration, add flashing and install FS1010 Spacer as needed for face fastening the panel edge at framing locations. Ensure minimum '/a" gap between the bottom of the panel edge and penetration blocking. Keep any face fasteners 1 " away from panel edges. If installing railings or signage over AWP, ensure fasteners are secured through Spacers to the framing or other structural support. Do not fasten any attachment solely to AWP. LAST COURSE All Applications Fasten Spacer (FS 1010) to the wall where the last panel course will terminate. This is needed to maintain the rainscreen without use of the clips. Cut the panels (horizontally) to properly fit at the termination line. Apply low adhesive/painter's tape to panels at face fastening locations. Pre -drill with countersink 1 " down from the top (cut) edge. Face - fasten at the studs and through the green Spacer (FS 1010) all along the top using bugle head type screws. Fill counter -sunk fastener holes with exterior cementitious filler, such as MH Ready Patch° and later dab touch-up paint with cotton swabs. Remove the painter's tape. Alternatively, utilize the Finish Clip instead of face fastening. Cut panels horizontally to properly align with the roof line or transition point height. Use a biscuit joiner to route notches into this cut edge, spaced to coincide with stud locations. Add 5mm corrugated Spacer (FS 1005) at Finish Clip fastening/stud locations prior to fastening clips. Set panels into place and seat/fasten a Finish Clip at each stud location. Cover the top panel row edge with a roof cap/ coping, where applicable. METAL COPING FACE FASTENER NICHIHA 10MM SPACER 36 PENETRATIONS, RAILINGS & SIGNAGE Packet Pg. 227-39 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO GABLES & OVERHANGS Allow a minimum of 1 " clearance (as per local building codes) for AWP above a roof line. At top, cut the panel to follow the slope of the gable. When installing soffit, AWP should be installed first, with the soffit installed over/butting to the panels. Panels installed along gable edges must be face fastened. When adding face screws, apply fasteners at least 1 " from any panel edge. This will avoid cracking or breaking of the panel. All face -fastened panels must be shimmed out with FS 1010 Spacer. Seal all cut panel edges with 100% acrylic primer or paint. Do not leave any panel edges exposed. Clean any cut panels to remove dust. Essential Overhang Flashing may be used at the base of overhangs/bump-outs or porte-cocheres. Prior to panel installation, fasten Overhang Flashing at each stud location, beginning with corner segments. Main segments will slide under/overlap corner segments. Use Joint Clip segments to join main segments together. After the first piece is secured, add a Joint Clip, fastening through both it and the first main segment. The next main piece will slide behind the Joint Clip. Position Overhang Flashing so that its bottom/ return flange butts to or overlaps soffit. The bottom return portion must extend beyond the face of the fascia substrate. \ - ----------------------- --- \------ _______________ -------------- SPACER--�' - --- - - -------- FACE FASTENERS 1" FROM PANEL EDGE ESSENTIAL OVERHANG FLASHING & JOINT CLIP OUTSIDE CORNER SOFFIT INSIDE CORNER ESSENTIAL OVERHANG FLASHING ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO CLEANING & MAINTENANCE CLEANING PANELS After completion of the installation or for periodic maintenance, it may be necessary to clean panels. When cleaning panels, use no more than 400 psi of water pressure at 10" to 12" away. Do not pressure wash custom color panels. To clean heavily soiled areas, a mild household detergent and/or soft bristle brush may be required. Do not allow any detergent/cleaner to dry on panels. Rinse immediately after cleaning. PAINT TOUCH-UP Touch up paint must be exterior grade 100% acrylic latex and can be color matched by taking a panel sample to your local paint or home improvement store. A small can of touch-up paint is supplied with your custom color panel order. Do not use for edge coating/sealing for larger projects as there will not be sufficient supply. Isolate touch-up locations with low-adhesive/painter's tape. Where face fasteners have been used and patched by cementitious filler, use a cotton swab to lightly dab touch-up paint. For scratches, use a cotton swab for small ones or 1 " foam brush for longer ones, again using a dabbing motion rather than brushing in order to minimize the amount of paint applied. REMOVAL OF EXTERIOR ACRYLIC LATEX PAINT Wet Paint Removal - While the paint is still wet, flush the area with clean water, using mild abrasion with a clean cloth or soft brush. Semi -Dry Paint Removal - If paint has set, but not dried, flush and clean as above, followed by light scrubbing with alcohol to remove any remaining paint residue. Rinse with water and a clean cloth. Dry Paint Removal - Please refer to paint -removal guide in the next section. 38 CLEANING & MAINTENANCE Packet Pg. 227-41 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO OTHER PAINT & GRAFFITI REMOVAL The following products have been tested on Nichiha panels to aid in the removal of graffiti type markings.* These citrus -based products can also be used for basic panel cleaning purposes. The panels were sprayed with an indoor/outdoor aerosol spray paint and left to dry overnight, and then the paint removal products were applied following the manufacturer's guidelines. All products tested achieved good results. However, the outcome may vary depending on the amount of paint that needs to be removed. Be sure to follow all manufacturer's guidelines and first test in an inconspicuous area before working on a larger area. Do NOT use these cleaners with custom color panels. *Nichiha is not liable for any damage caused by the use of these cleaners. CITRISTRIP www.citristrip.com Products tested: Citristrip Striping Gel - One Quart container Citristrip Stripping Aerosol - 18 oz. spray can GOOF OFF GRAFFITI REMOVER www.goof-off.com Products tested: Goof Off Aerosol - 16 oz. spray can Goof Off - 22 oz. trigger spray bottle TAGAWAY www.tagaway.com Product tested: Tagaway - 32 oz. trigger spray bottle ZINSSER www.zinsser.com Product tested: Zinsser Graffiti Remover and Stripper - 16 oz. trigger spray bottle REPAIRING MINOR DAMAGE Isolate the blemish with a low adhesive tape such as painters tape. This will help protect the surrounding area of the panel and aide in creating a more polished, clean repair. Lightly brush/abrade the surface within the taped off area in order to remove any loose material. Carefully fill and smooth the resultant prepped area with cementitious patching material such as MH Ready Patch. Allow to dry/cure fully. Gently smooth the patch and then apply touch-up paint to the affected area. Allow touch-up paint to dry and remove the tape. ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO PANEL REPLACEMENT Set the depth of a circular saw blade slightly deeper than the panel so the saw blade does not cut into the building wrap or sheathing. Make cuts into the damaged panel and break it into pieces for easier removal of the damaged panel. Remove damaged panel. Use a 10mm Corrugated Spacer and place it behind the new panel at bottom, just above exposed Panel Clips or Starter Track, Cut 3/16" off the back ship -lapped edge at bottom of panel.* For AWP-1818, cut the right side ship -lapped edge off the panel. Prepare to set the new panel in place. Lift panel into place by prying from the bottom upward. Pre -drill and face fasten the panel with a screw into the framing members, 2" from panel bottom. Fill countersunk screw heads with color -matching cementitious patching material. Touch up with exterior grade acrylic latex paint *If panel to be replaced is at the top course or under a window, cut the top edge of the panel as needed and leave the bottom shiplap intact. Add Spacer at top of uncovered wall space and face fasten the ripped top edge of the replacement panel. 40 CLEANING & MAINTENANCE Packet Pg. 227-43 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO 3/16" [5mm] Trim this edge a ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO Behind our Architectural Wall Panels is SOME SERIOUS TECHNOLOGY. o EASY INSTALLATION Time -saving Clip Installation System that reduces construction time and minimizes mistakes. LOW MAINTENANCE I' © No -fuss products. Little ongoing cleaning or regular maintenance needed. You get to bring your vision to life and ensure it looks great for a long time. THE ULTIMATE CLIP creates a hidden fasteni but eliminates face fastE is quick and easy and ne specialty subcontractors NICHIHA ARCHITECTL WALL PANELS are lightweight, easy tc available in a virtually e palette and a diverse c textural finishes. NO MORTAR, NO MESS Pre -finished panels that eliminate the need for messy mortar or costly masonry -skilled labor. e`'� ENGINEERED FOR PERFORMANCE �(��j'J� Go beyond our durable panels and discover a meticulously engineered moisture management system that provides a vertical drainage point for air and moisture to exit. ANY WEATHER PRODUCT Products that can be installed year round in any climate across the country. No geographical restrictions means more possibilities. NICHIHA'S JOINT TAB ATTACHMENT is designed to support panel lateral stability, helping vertical joints stay tightly closed. The tab fits in place easily and is fastened to the Ultimate Clip with provided screw. AINED AND BACK NTILATED RAINSCREEN sign allows water to escape and air to -ulate, reducing the risk of mold and ter damage inside the building. E ULTIMATE STARTER TRACK Is double -duty. It ensures a fast, level tallation and its patented drainage mnel directs water out and away n the base of the wall. 42 RESOURCES Packet Pg. 227-45 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO Never underestimate the power of REALLY GOOD TOOLS. Whether you are an architect, a builder or a contractor, Nichiha wants to ensure that you have all the information you need to make your project go as smoothly as possible. The way we see it, we are partners. Our website offers a comprehensive collection of technical information, installation videos, Architectural details, in-depth specifications and everything you'll ever need to know about installing Nichiha products. DESIGN REVIEW GUIDE Download our quick reference guide to get an overview on our Architectural Wall Panels. http://www.nichiha.com/images/uploads/Design ReviewGuide_Electronic.pdf ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS Take a closer look and download our conceptual detail drawings. nichiha.com/resources/cad INSTALL VIDEOS Watch our installation instructions come to life — check out our installation videos today! nichiha.com/commercial/install SUPPORT Our in-house technical team is here to assist. If you have questions, comments or concerns, call or email us. 1.866.424.4421 or technicalservices@nichiha.com ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, NICHIHA INFO THE POWER OF POSSIBILITIES AND PARTNERSHIPS Your creative vision is unique. That's why Nichiha wants to offer you the power of cooperation to help your project move from conception to completion. Our ever-expanding offering of textures and finishes lift buildings to new and unexpected places and we want to share them with you. We place a high value on our relationships and are proud to work with our dedicated partners across the country. Join us and discover the power of possibilities and partnerships with Nichiha. NICHIHA WARRANTIES CERTIFICATION & TESTING • ILLUMINATION SERIES PANELS 15-year limited warranty* on panels, 15-year limited warranty* on finish. • ARCHITECTURAL WALL PANELS (Brick, Block, Stone, Wood, Kurastone) 15-year limited warranty* on panels, Report Florida Approval Report 15-year limited warranty* on finish. EC-58 12875 PER-14088 • METALTRIM Tamlyn warrants defective -free products for a period of 10 years for the original purchaser. Please visit tamlyn.com for MAM® Mr detailed information on terms, conditions and limitations. WUI Miami -Dade *See Nichiha warranties for detailed information on terms, conditions and 8140-2029 NOA 16-0404.18 limitations. Visit nichiha.com for easy downloadable warranties or call toll - free 1.866.424.4421 for a copy. Nichiha SIDS are available on nichiha.com. CRYSTALLINE SILICA DUST WARNING: Nichiha products may contain some amounts of crystalline silica [a.k.a. sand, silicone dioxide], which is a naturally occurring mineral. The amount will vary from product to product. Inhalation of crystalline silica into the lungs and repeated exposure to silica can cause health disorders, such as silicosis, lung cancer, or death depending upon various factors. To be conservative, Nichiha recommends that whenever cutting, sawing, sanding, sniping, or abrading the product, users NICHIHAobserve appropriate safety protocols. For further information or questions, please consult Nichiha SIDS, your employer, or visit fiber cement osha.gov/silica and cdc.gov/niosh/topics/silica. The SIDS for Nichiha products are available at nichiha.com/resources, at your local the power of possibilities" Nichiha dealer, or through Nichiha directly at 1.866.424.4421. FAILURE TO ADHERE TO OUR WARNINGS, SIDS, AND OTHER INSTRUCTION MAY LEAD TO SERIOUS PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH. 6465 E. JOHNS CROSSING, SUITE 250, JOHNS CREEK, GA 30097 866.424.4421 I NICHIHA.COM 02018 Nichiha USA, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the USA. NLC 4K 4.18 I WEB 4.18 Packet Pg. 227-47 ITEM 67 221 E. MOUNTAIN, PERSPECTIVES PERSPECTIVE 1 PERSPECTIVE 2 Packet Pg. 227-48 6 79M ref ""0 4"F' d6r 9600 f OR Mh1q. Lmm . twr trio �• � 1YkY• �� M'mFmdw 0 "F4 mwmmmhm M&^ +'*ESM w} mw%f " V rbaqm i brddft rrmiro Emp"Iw 4 t h era 4ir�r.4f4r � MIF I J i — ti a is• I AL ��--yy'� CC You Ft C.060 R, %7 VuFL 9w r10 i dY 4M ■+*+W 06rj.LMhri+ h� is �w ab..m*F! Imb*0 i PME q� f"ai F 4 rmwbi Fi f es wmMIMEW W i *mks ON 7i Amr M" &Wd4 &m� YA ti %% M !i! km6bbo MM=MYr Fi 110 E mpbm • it 44f1 : • W fmmp=mm %omp Pomb f 7ml4 nY 0F� chmf7'rhmy�q"Y Vr q,wmw� M-4 4%p r Agenda Item 7 PROJECT NAME DOWNTOWN AND TRANSITION AREAS CODE UPDATES AND RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL STAFF Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner Cameron Gloss, Planning Manager =16Mx091kiU101 LhFit 1[07ki PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this item is to provide the Landmark Preservation Commission a progress report on two interrelated Land Use Code amendment projects that together address design standards for Downtown and within Neighborhood Conservation Buffer (NCB) transition areas at the interface between Downtown and the Old Town Neighborhoods. Staff is requesting that the Commission provide a recommendation to City Council on the proposed changes. APPLICANT: Cameron Gloss, Planning Manager; Pete Wray, Senior City Planner RECOMMENDATION: Staff is seeking a recommendation in support of the proposed changes. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose and objectives Staff has been working closely with area property owners, businesses and design professionals, to develop Land Use Code amendment concepts necessary to implement policies within the recently adopted (2017) - Downtown Plan and the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan. The project objective is to provide greater predictability in the Land Use Code regulations by clarifying standards that apply to new infill and redevelopment projects. The Code changes provide form- and performance -based metrics that augment existing design standards. The new standards need to be predictable yet allow for creative building forms and site design options. This joint code improvement effort also aligns with the goals and implementation efforts of the Historic Preservation code review project. Downtown Subdistricts Since Downtown encompasses much more than the historic "Old Town" core, with differing character distinguishing Subdistricts within Downtown. These Subdistricts are: • Old City Center Subdistrict • Civic Subdistrict ■ Canyon Avenue Subdistrict ■ River Downtown Redevelopment Subdistrict Item # 7 Page 1 Packet Pg. 228 Agenda Item 7 ■ Poudre River Corridor ■ Innovation Subdistrict ■ North Mason Subdistrict ■ Campus North Subdistrict The last three of the subdistricts listed lie within expanded boundaries of the Downtown zone district. The goal of identifying the character defining traits for each Subdistrict is to promote and enhance them through public and private development projects. The Code update will include language to help guide the character of these areas similar to the current River Downtown Redevelopment (RDR) Zone. Some examples of elements to consider are historical context, landscape setting, contextual building form, and predominant materials. Street Character as a Defining Element Three types of street frontages have evolved Downtown shaping the public realm and building placement. The Downtown Plan and current Code updated have illuminated the need to protect and enhance these three conditions. Storefront - Found primarily along College Avenue and Linden Street, buildings abut a wide sidewalk which is ideal for pedestrians. Retail and commercial uses dominate the ground floor with a high degree of visual interest and transparency into shops and restaurants. Mixed Use - Found outside the Historic Core on streets such as Mason, this condition is a hybrid between the Storefront and Green Edge frontage types. Building are set a little farther back from the sidewalk, often with small landscape beds separating the building from the walk. There is significantly less ground floor retail, but buildings still meet the pedestrian realm in a quasi -urban fashion. Green Edge - Found primarily in the Canyon Avenue Subdistrict and northeast of the Poudre River, this frontage type is best recognized for generous parkway widths and substantial landscaped setbacks between the sidewalk and the building. Ground floor uses range from residential to office, often in much larger buildings than are found in the Historic Core Subdistrict. Building Placement Building Placement Standards are determined by the street frontage types with setbacks ranging from 0-10+ feet from the back of the sidewalk. Specific setback distances help with building mass mitigation, and strengthen pedestrian experience appropriate for the specific area of Downtown. Building Height and Form The Downtown skyline is expected to continue to evolve with a limited number of additional buildings that will rise above the tree canopy, in the 7-12 story range, mainly to the west and south of the Historic Core. Current standards provide for a height range from 2.5 stories to 12 stories. Maximum building heights are on a block -by - block basis, with the tallest portion of a building limited to these maximum heights. Existing Land Use Code regulations set maximum allowable heights on a given site, but other factors associated with Code requirements and development project needs often ultimately determine the height of a specific building. During the review process, a lower limit can be placed on a building based on design standards for compatibility. The approach with the proposed height revisions shifts to a more clearly stated regulatory framework to facilitate more efficient review of proposed development projects. Ultimately, these revised regulations are intended to provide more predictable outcomes in the development review process Proposed building height allowances maintain most of the existing height capacity, but provide for selected reductions in certain blocks that are consistent with the character districts and the juxtaposition of building heights within a block face. New standards provide a height range between 3 -12 stories, with a one-story height incentive. Item # 7 Page 2 Packet Pg. 229 Agenda Item 7 Participants in the Downtown planning process and the most recent Land Use Code draft revisions have differed in their opinions about the proposed building height limits. Some of the public participants and individual property owners have remained neutral on the issue, others have called for a reduction in the maximum allowable heights, particularly above the 6-story level on one end of the spectrum, while others have expressed concern over any loss in potential height capacity. The latest iteration of the height standards collectively adds the equivalent of 9'/2 stories of additional volume to the Downtown. Most of the additional stories are gained within the Canyon Avenue Subdistrict and lowering of heights occurs principally within the Civic Subdistrict and a few of the blocks at the edge of Downtown. The Neighborhood Conservation Buffer (NCB) Zone provides a transition between the intensity of Downtown and the single-family character of the Old Town Neighborhoods. Currently, the NCB Zone allows for commercial and multi -family buildings up to three stories. Through the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan process, the need to provide greater clarity for how these larger buildings are to develop was identified. This Code update aims to generate regulations to strengthen block -face contextual response of new projects, and to ensure new buildings don't have adverse impacts on their neighbors such as significant shading. Improving building roof form requirements and massing to protect solar access are the primary methods to aid in compatible new development. Community Engagement Staff has held three open house events, multiple one-on-one and small group meetings with property owners and designers, and presented draft code concepts to the DDA, DBA, Board of Realtors, Chamber of Commerce, members of the Downtown and Old Town Neighborhoods Plan efforts, and several advisory boards and commissions. The first open house, was held on February 28th at The Elizabeth Hotel, and was well -attended by members of the design and development community. A second open house was an all -day event on April 18tn The last open house was held on July 25tn. These events have helped to inform staff on the level of support for the proposed code elements. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Presentation (PDF) Item # 7 Page 3 Packet Pg. 230 c O ca c m E E O m 06 N O Q D O ma O U Cn M a� a O .y C ca L mo i C 3 O c 3 O 0 N O ti C O to O M d i a M c m E tU M El Packet Pg. 231 c O ca c m E E O m 06 N O Q D O ma O U Cn M a� a O .y C ca L mo i C 3 O c 3 O 0 N O ti C O to O M d i a M c m E tU M El Packet Pg. 232 Downtown Subdistricts 5 w ic AF �o cr r� City of Fort Cottins Sidewalk °c Storefront Varies CO Parkway Sidewalk a Mixed Use 8' 6' t) CO MWOMMOMMEN Parkway Sidewalk t Green Edge 9S io oo O Cu E 0 O 06 N O Q D O ma O Cn M a O .y C Cu L FM i C 3 O c 3 O 0 N O ti ZI Packet Pg. 234 Length of Building in Build To Range IF, Total Parcel Frontage (Feet) KEY • Property Line I Build To Range — — — — — - Min. Setback Required Build To Range * Inn= Build -To Percentage Min. Setback Based on S treat Frontage Type I - I I I N f c O fa c m E E O U m 06 N O Q D O ma O U ca W a O .y C ca L ma S= C 3 O c 0 0 N O ti v C O fa f= W W i a �a }r N w^ W E m U 0 Packet Pg. 235 7.a Slide 9 CG4 replace with new table Cameron Gloss, 7/19/2018 El Packet Pg. 236 City of Fort � t�s m 3'Upc-'" .;k at a..I,.-- ha-... }I L 3npJ City of Fort Cottins KEY IBwlding Base Material Requirement 'Note other Upper Story Stepbacks may be requu- i •to , r 'i Ec-�-�1► - Packet Pg. 237 City of Fort � t�s / Total Transparent Window Area Provided in Zone of Transparency ISFI Ground Floor x 100 = Transparency Lnal Street -Facing Frontage IFeeo x Zone of Transparency IFeen Percentage Storefront 123 N College Ave. T 2oreo1 TfanspererCY 7 _.arm.• �..i \. rr �� r i Green Edge Ground -Floor Transparency Approximately 60% Packet Pg. 238 FCity of ort 10-12 Stories 150 ft. 3-4 Stories 56 ft. 7-9 Stories 115 ft. 3-4 Stories 45 ft. 5-6 Stories 85 ft. ■ 3 Stories ■ 5 Stories ■ 2.5 Stories G3 Packet Pg. 239 7.a Slide 15 CG1 Cameron Gloss, 7/19/2018 CG2 replace with new chart Cameron Gloss, 7/19/2018 CG3 replace with new chart Cameron Gloss, 7/19/2018 CGS replace with new table Cameron Gloss, 7/19/2018 Packet Pg. 240 c O ca c m E E O m 06 N O Q D O ma O U Cn M a� a O .y C ca L mo i C 3 O c 3 O 0 N O ti C O to O M d i a M c m E tU M El Packet Pg. 241 City of Fort Collins Proposed Height Changes GOALS: -1 ;s 1. Reduce height around Downtown perimeter to create a better transition to neighborhoods. -g z +613 j 2. Increase height in areas that can support more density where there +6 is infill and redevelopment +6 potential and meets urban design r3 objectives. Packet Pg. 242 City of FortCollins f� • Third floor step -back driven by height of adjacent building/existing context • Avoid standards that create wedding -cake' -shaped buildings • Third floor step -back driven by height of adjacent historical building. • Lower stories address the contextual height and human scale with no step -backs on upper stories. Packet Pg. 243 City of Fort Collins Buildings greater than 6 stories in height must provide four-sided architecture for all facades above the 6th floor. Packet Pg. 244 c O ca c m E E O m 06 N O Q D O ma O U Cn M a� a O .y C ca L mo i C 3 O c 3 O 0 N O ti C O to O M d i a M c m E tU M El Packet Pg. 245 c O ca c m E E O m 06 N O Q D O ma O U Cn M a� a O .y C ca L mo i C 3 O c 3 O 0 N O ti C O to O M d i a M c m E tU M El Packet Pg. 246 ITEM 7, PUBLIC COMMENT, G. JANETT From: Karen McWilliams To: Gina Janett Cc: Mea Dunn; Cameron Gloss; Gretchen Schiaaer; Maren Bzdek Subject: RE: Comments to LPC on Downtown and Transition Areas Code Update Date: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 12:13:43 PM Hi, Gina —Thanks for your comments. I'll arrange for this information to be provided to all of the LPC members, and to Cameron. While the LPC will be hearing about the project at tomorrow night's Work Session, they will not be discussing it in detail until next Wednesday's Regular Meeting, when they are being asked for a recommendation to Council. - Karen Karen McWilliams Historic Preservation Manager City of Fort Collins 970.224.6078 kmcwilliams(@fcgov.com Click here to tell us about our service, We want to know! From: Gina Janett <ginaciao@frii.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2018 8:05 AM To: Karen McWilliams <KMCWILLIAMS@fcgov.com> Cc: Meg Dunn <barefootmeg@gmail.com> Subject: Comments to LPC on Downtown and Transition Areas Code Update Hi Karen, Below are my comments to the LPC for tomorrow night's agenda item #7 concerning the proposed Downtown and Transition Area Code Updates. Please share them with the Board. 1. On multiple occasions at multiple open houses, the residents of the historic neighborhood to the west of Meldrum Street have repeatedly requested an update to city plans to provide a true buffer zone between downtown zoning and the residential neighborhood to the west. The proposed code update does not provide a true buffer zone on the west edge of downtown in locations along Meldrum and Canyon as shown on the map on page 24. The block bounded by Mountain, Meldrum, Oak and the alley should be down zoned from downtown zoning to NCM to create an actual buffer. Additionally, I would encourage the LPC to request that the zoning be changed to NCL long the block face of S. Sherwood where it faces west. Sherwood has historic homes that should not be under pressure for demolition on both the east and west sides of the street between Canyon and Magnolia. These actions would better protect the existing historic structures along Sherwood Street and meet the stated policy of having buffer zones around the entire perimeter of the downtown district. Packet Pg. 247 ITEM 7, PUBLIC COMMENT, G. JANETT 2. As shown on the map on page 17 and 18, the proposed code update is proposing to increase the height of the buildings to 6 stories in the block located between Mountain, Meldrum, Oak and the alley. This is a half block that should be changed to a true buffer zone. This is the block just north of the block containing the Otterbox headquarters and the Chamber of Commerce and should be limited to a 3 story height, not increased to 6 stories. This would better improve buffering in order to better protect the historic houses and houses used as commercial along Mountain, Sherwood and Oak Streets. This upzoning in height allowances will put more redevelopment pressure on these historic residential structures and could result in their being eventually demolished. I encourage the LPC to recommend that there not be an additional 3 stories height allowance for this % block. It should be a buffer zone with NCM zoning and no more than 3 story heights. 3. Finally, I would encourage the board to consider what increasing building heights in downtown will do to the existing downtown buildings' viewsheds. Increasing the height in some blocks will result in blocking the views of existing buildings. This is a matter of picking winners and losers with the winners being the new developments and the losers being the historic buildings that have long provided views from their upper stories both west and east. We are a growing city with commercial buildings not only in our downtown but all along the Mason Corridor spine and along Harmony. We don't need skyscrapers downtown but rather need to disperse larger commercial buildings to other parts of the city where residential and shopping districts can support them. 4. In short, the Old Town residential areas, west, east and southwest of downtown, are unique and special areas containing our community's oldest architecture and character and should be better protected for preservation into the future. When local residents take visitors around our city, they proudly show off the residences along W. Mountain, Oak, Remington and to such as Library Park. Let's take every effort to protect our historic neighborhoods. Sincerely, Gina Gina C. Janett 730 W Oak St. Fort Collins, CO 80521 970 222-5896 ginaciao(Wrii.com Packet Pg. 248