Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/17/2017 - Landmark Preservation Commission - Agenda - Regular MeetingMeg Dunn, Chair Per Hogestad, Vice Chair Doug Ernest Bud Frick Kristin Gensmer Dave Lingle Mollie Simpson Alexandra Wallace Belinda Zink City Council Chambers City Hall West 300 Laporte Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. Video of the meeting will be broadcast at 1:30 p.m. the following day through the Comcast cable system on Channel 14 or 881 (HD). Please visit http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/ for the daily cable schedule. The video will also be available for later viewing on demand here: http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php. Regular Meeting May 17, 2017 5:30 PM • CALL TO ORDER • ROLL CALL • AGENDA REVIEW o Staff Review of Agenda • STAFF REPORTS • PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA • DISCUSSION AGENDA 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 19, 2017 REGULAR MEETING. The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the April 19, 2017 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. 2. 305 CIRCLE DRIVE - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposal to demolish the residence and attached garage located at 305 Circle Drive. The property was determined to be individually eligible as a Fort Collins Landmark. APPLICANT: Barry Schram, Lamar Valley Craftsman 3. CONFLUENCE (PDP170001) - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This proposal is a mixed -use project of residential, office, commercial space, and parking on a 0.4-acre site at 401, 405, and 409 Linden Street in the River Downtown Redevelopment District (RDR). Final review will be a Type 1 hearing with a hearing officer. APPLICANT: Jason Kersley, [au]workshop, Ilc., 405 Linden Street • OTHER BUSINESS • ADJOURNMENT Roll Call and Voting Record Landmark Preservation Commission Date: 5/17/17 ROLL CALL Ernest ✓ Frick ✓ Gensmer ✓ Ho estad ✓ Lingle absent Simpson absent (recused from both items Wallace ✓ Zink ✓ Dunn ✓ VOTING RECORD Item: Minutes April 19, 2017 Item: 305 Circle Dr. Demo/Alt Ernest Yes Ernest Yes Frick Yes Frick Yes Gensmer abstained Gensmer Yes Ho estad Yes Ho estad Yes Wallace Yes Wallace Yes Zink Yes Zink Yes Dunn Yes Dunn Yes RESULTS: 6:0 RESULTS: 7:0 Item: Confluence Area of Adjacency Item: Confluence Recommendation Ernest Yes Ernest Yes Frick recused Frick recused Gensmer recused Gensmer recused Ho estad Yes Ho estad Yes Wallace Yes Wallace Yes Zink Yes Zink Yes Dunn Yes Dunn Yes RESULTS: 5:0 RESULTS: 5:0 LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING Chambers, 300 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521 DATE: 5 [ 7 1 7 Name Mailing Address M1 Email and/or Phone / Agenda ItemReason for Attendance �� �'tea �." ►� • ' � a ,/ � • rjjU 7W'A MiAWA-:,4&p Log of Packet Additions Landmark Preservation Commission Meeting Date: 5/17/17 All materials received after the packet was initially published, but prior to the hearing: Item # Item Name Description Actions 3 Confluence Updated Applicant Presentation Added to packet on 5/16 3 Confluence Updated Staff Presentation & Staff Report Added to packet on 5/16 2 305 Circle Dr. 15 Citizen letters and one phone log Added to packet on 5/16 All materials submitted at the hearing: (These items will be added to the final post -hearing packet, and hard copy meeting record.) Item # Item Name Exhibit Description 2 305 Circle Dr. 1 Citizen Letter Updated Staff Presentation 2 305 Circle Dr. 2 Updated Staff Presentation 3 Confluence 1 Photos of the materials samples circulated to the Commission by Applicant CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO The following disclosure statement is submitted to the Clerk of the City of Fort Collins pursuant to the requirements of Article IV, Section 9 of the City Charter and, to the extent applicable, Section 24A8-109(3)(a), C.R.S. or pursuant to City of Fort Collins Personnel Policy 5.7.2.F. Name: Title: Decision(s) or contract affected (give description of item to be addressed by Council, Board, Service Area Director, etc.): Brief statement of interest: C�vti n�►�S.y , �r.i ►M1 ;t 5 Date: r5171J7 Signature: REMOVAL OF CONFLOt OF INTEREST I affirm that the above -stated conflict of interest no longer exists. Date: Signature: cc (if Councilmember or Board or Commission member): City Attorney and City Manager cc (if City employee): HR Director Updated: March 2014 CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO The following disclosure statement is submitted to the Clerk of the City of Fort Collins pursuant to the requirements of Article IV, Section 9 of the City Charter and, to the extent applicable, Section 24A8-109(3)(a), C.R.S. or pursuant to City of Fort Collins Personnel Policy 5.7.2.F. Name: Kristin Gensmer Title: Landmark Preservation Commission Member Decision(s) or contract affected (give description of item to be addressed by Council, Board, Service Area Director, etc.): CONFLUENCE (PDP170001) - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Brief statement of interest: �(1 'Pr Gf � .�. am fit- `1� Dana � be ctA G�p�ar�nce �� c, Con-�'I�cC�ck Date: I Signature: o REMOVAL OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST I affirm that the above -stated conflict of interest no longer exists. Date: Signature: cc (if Councilmember or Board or Commission member): City Attorney and City Manager cc (if City employee): HR Director Updated: March 2014 CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLO"DO The following disclosure statement is submitted to the Clerk of the City of Fort Collins pursuant to the requirements of Article IV, Section 9 of the City Charter and, ;o the extent applicable, Section 24A8A09(3)(a), C.R.S. or pursuant to City of Fort Collins Personnel Policy 5.7.2.F. Name: Mollie Simpson Title: Landmark Preservation Commission Member Decision(s) or contract affected (give description of item to be addressed by Council, Board, Service Area Director, etc.): 305 Circle Drive Demolition/Alteration Review Brief statement of interest: Date: ; r7yft� m� Signature: REMOVAL OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST I affirm that the above -stated conflict of interest no longer exists. Date: Signature: /sv % 1�tlj cc (if Councilmember or Board or Commission member): City Attorney and City Manager cc (if City employee): HR Director Updated: March 2014 CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO The following disclosure statement is submitted to the Clerk of the City of Fort Collins pursuant to the requirements of Article IV, Section 9 of the City Charter and, to the extent applicable, Section 24A8-109(3)(a), C.R.S. or pursuant to City of Fort Collins Personnel Policy 5.7.2.17. Name: 0\\ Title: Decision(s) or contract affected (give description of item to be addressed by Council, Board, Service Area Director, etc.): Can �t ,� t Pap oml>l, Brief statement of interest: �1�- rJesr�,� r�� �"°"`�```�1 , tN� l I ►�- olcst��►►� ivm� C Ak) &AjUrV-GVLO1O f tL4�. Pf%rfJ�kc" . Date: Signature: Y\A, REMOVAL OF CONFLICT O INTEREST I affirm that the above -stated conflict of interest no longer exists. Date: Signature: cc (if Councilmember or Board or Commission member): City Attorney and City Manager cc (if City employee): HR Director Updated: March 2014 Agenda Item 1 STAFF Gretchen Schiager, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 19, 2017 REGULAR MEETING. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the April 19, 2017 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS 1. LPC April 19, 2017 Minutes - DRAFT (PDF) Item # 1 Page 1 Packet Pg. 3 1.a Meg Dunn, Chair Per Hogestad, Vice Chair Doug Ernest Bud Frick Kristin Gensmer Dave Lingle Mollie Simpson Alexandra Wallace Belinda Zink City Council Chambers City Hall West 300 Laporte Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. Video of the meeting will be broadcast at 1:30 p.m. the following day through the Comcast cable system on Channel 14 or 881 (HD). Please visit http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/ for the daily cable schedule. The video will also be available for later viewing on demand here: http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php. Regular Meeting April 19, 2017 Minutes • CALL TO ORDER Chair Dunn called the meeting to order at 5:33 p.m. • ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dunn, Zink, Hogestad, Wallace, Lingle, Ernest, Frick, Simpson ABSENT: Gensmer STAFF: McWilliams, Bzdek, Bumgarner, Yatabe, Schiager • AGENDA REVIEW There were no changes to the posted agenda packet since the work session. • STAFF REPORTS None. City of Fort Collins Page 1 Ms. McWilliams briefly reviewed updates to the April 18, 2017 ti TOM 0 N ai TMM a Q u_ O co w FM D Z_ 0 ti LO LO Packet Pg. 4 1.a • PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. • CONSENT AGENDA 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 8, SPECIAL MEETING. The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the March 8, 2017 special meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. 2. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 15. SPECIAL MEETING The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the March 15, 2017 special meeting of the TOM Landmark Preservation Commission. N ai 3. 225 MAPLE STREET - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION J PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City a Council regarding landmark designation for the Continental Oil Q Company Property, a collection of twentieth-century industrial W O buildings that are significant for their connection to the oil industry in y Fort Collins and architecture. W FM APPLICANT: Kenneth Mannon, Operations Services Director Z 4. 212 LAPORTE AVENUE - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City ti Council regarding landmark designation for the Dairy Gold Creamery ,`O Laboratory, a midcentury commercial building that is significant for its connection to the dairy industry in Fort Collins and Googie-style Q architecture. APPLICANT: Kenneth Mannon, Operations Services Director o 5. 300 LAPORTE AVENUE - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council regarding landmark designation for the Historic Fort Collins Municipal Building, an International -style municipal building that is TM significant for its connection to the growth in Fort Collins post -World N War II, notable local architect William Robb, and architecture. a; TM APPLICANT: Kenneth Mannon, Operations Services Director a In response to a question by Mr. Lingle, Ms. McWilliams clarified the City's desire to designate only Q the footprints of the three buildings. a J Mr. Ernest moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission accept the Consent Agenda of the April 19, 2017 regular meeting as presented. Ms. Zink seconded. The motion passed 8-0. E • DISCUSSION AGENDA a 6. ALTA VISTA NEIGHBORHOOD HISTORIC SURVEY - PROJECT RESULTS The purpose of this item is to provide the Commission and citizens with information regarding the Alta Vista Neighborhood Historic Survey Project. The survey has been conducted by Colorado State University historic preservation graduate students, working under the direction of Dr. Sarah Payne. Staff Report Ms. McWilliams introduced the item. City of Fort Collins Page 2 April 18, 2017 Packet Pg. 5 1.a Student Presentation The graduate students gave a presentation about the survey work they had completed, including the methodology used, findings and next steps. [Secretary's Note: The presentation has been added to the online packet.] Commission Questions and Discussion Mr. Ernest asked whether the students had received any feedback from the Alta Vista residents with regard to the possibility of a landmark district designation. One of the students responded that the reactions of the residents were varied, and that there were questions about what a designation would mean to them. Mr. Lingle inquired about evidence that flat roofs had been converted to gable roofs. A student explained that those findings primarily came from historic records they had located. Mr. Hogestad suggested that when the nomination is prepared, it would be beneficial to include information about vernacular add-ons, economic drivers, and how various trends in the neighborhood evolved. He stated it would be interesting to follow up on the open courtyards or haciendas, and the organization of the outbuildings around them, as part of the nomination process. Mr. Ernest commented that the oral histories of Hispanics in the area told stories of discrimination, including use of discriminatory signs at businesses, but it has been difficult to find any actual documentation, photos, or evidence of that. He encouraged the students to be on the lookout for anything of that nature. Dr. Payne acknowledged the great work of the students. She noted that historical isolation and insulation of this community were recurring themes in their research. Another student added that Hispanics had started their own American Legion post because the establishments wouldn't serve them. Ms. Wallace asked about connections to Andersonville and Buckingham. A student responded that a strong tradition of earthen architecture was common among the Germans from Russia, as well as the Hispanic immigrants. Chair Dunn commented that the Alta Vista community had historically been unrecognized and pointed out the importance of this study. • CONSENT CALENDAR FOLLOW UP Chair Dunn explained she had unintentionally skipped this section of the agenda earlier. She explained the purpose of it was to allow the Commission Members to comment on the items on the consent calendar without opening them for discussion. Mr. Hogestad commented that 300 Laporte Ave. was a textbook example of International style, and he was pleased that its designation as a local landmark was on the agenda tonight. Chair Dunn said she was pleased that the City brought forward the three designations. Upon her request, Ms. Bzdek played a short video about the FoCo Cafe at 225 Maple. 7. LIVING OAKS (PDP170009) - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposed design for a three-story residential project that would be a Net Zero Energy building on a 4,600-square-foot site at the southwest corner of Oak and Mathews Streets. The development site is within the Neighborhood Conservation — Buffer District (NCB). Final review will be a Type 1 hearing with a hearing officer. APPLICANT/OWNER: Laurie and Bob Davis, DavisDavis Architects City of Fort Collins Page 3 April 18, 2017 ti TOM 0 N ai TMM J_ a Q u_ O co w FM D z 0 ti LO LO Packet Pg. 6 1.a Staff Report Ms. Bzdek presented the staff report. She discussed the area of adjacency, changes to the project since the last meeting, and the staff analysis and recommendation. She reviewed the new information provided at the Commission's request. Regarding the Commission's question at the work session about the entry, Ms. Bzdek read City Planner Clay Frickey's response, referencing Land Use Code Section 3.5.2(D)(2). Applicant Presentation Ms. Davis gave the Applicant presentation. She addressed the Commission's questions and concerns, beginning with the typology and the changes to the glass storefront. She discussed changes to size and height. She explained why the floor heights were necessary due to the sunlight angles. She addressed the changes in materials with the textured terracotta on the upper floors and the gray fiber cement on the first floor. She talked about character and pattern and how they have ti strengthened the design's historic ties. She provided the rationale for the color choices and showed c the height comparison with the Library Park Apartments. She discussed the addition of the terracotta N window headers and other details. r' J Public Input a None Q um Areaof Adiacency 0 co There were no questions from the Commission. W Mn Mr. Ernest moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission adopt as the area of adjacency z_ for the proposed Living Oaks building at 221 East Oak Street the sixteen designated and eligible buildings on Oak, Mathews, and Remington Streets, as listed in the staff report. ti Mr. Lingle seconded. The motion passed 8-0, ,`n Commission Questions � Mr. Hogestad asked for confirmation on the height, and Ms. Davis confirmed it is 39' 7" to the top. He asked if they had considered lowering the second floor by a foot, as they had done with the third floor. o Ms. Davis said they had not considered that, and pointed out that the McHugh -Andrews House was N similar at 38 feet. Mr. Hogestad pointed out that the building was still considerably taller than the average in the area. Mr. Hogestad expressed concern that that the roof style was dissimilar to the gabled and hipped ti residential roof styles in the area. Ms. Davis said the flat roof in the front lowers the front, and the o angled PVs give the appearance of a pitched roof to be more compatible with the neighborhood. Mr. N Hogestad said it was a shed roof, not a pitched roof. °' Mr. Hogestad asked if the fiber cement panels had a condition at the corner. Ms. Davis explained Q that while there are corner pieces available, they may not be within the budget, so there would likely v be an open joint at the corner. a J Ms. Zink asked if the ground floor is rainscreen, and Ms. Davis confirmed it was. Mr. Hogestad pointed out it was not made of clay, and Ms. Davis confirmed it was concrete and fiber. Mr. Frick asked about the structure of the floor system on the first floor and the demising walls. Ms. Davis said two steel trusses would run through it, basically a cantilevered beam that would probably ca be between 1'4" and 1'6". Q Mr. Lingle pointed out that the most immediately adjacent buildings tend to be the taller ones. Mr. Hogestad talked about the statistics of the heights and roof forms in the area. Commission Deliberation Mr. Lingle moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to the Decision Maker approval of the Living Oaks Project Development Plan (PDP170009), finding it is in compliance with the standards contained in Land Use Code section 3.4.7 in regard to compatibility with the character of the project's area of adjacency for the following reasons: City of Fort Collins Page 4 April 18, 2017 Packet Pg. 7 1.a • The project does not impact the individual eligibility for designation of the historic properties in the defined area of adjacency. • The project design uses massing and scale that is compatible with the historic context. • The project relies on building materials that are visually compatible with adjacent historic properties. • The project uses window patterning and proportions that provide visual ties to buildings within the adjacent historic context. • The proposed design does not impede existing visual and pedestrian connections to the adjacent neighborhood focal points. Ms. Zink seconded.TOM ti Mr. Hogestad stated his hesitancy to support the motion, as he did not believe the height, setbacks N and width met the requirements of section 3.4.7 to the maximum extent feasible. He stated the c; design was not in character with residential nature of the area. He said the design does not J strengthen the visual ties among buildings. He stated that the building doesn't have scale, and the materials and location of the front door don't help to establish that. a Q Mr. Lingle agreed with the staff analysis that the terracotta material visually harmonizes with the brick u_ O in the area as a modern interpretation of historic material, and argued that the terracotta does have y scale. He suggested the Commission should embrace the transition in time periods and the use of W modern materials that are compatible with historic materials in texture and color. Z Mr. Hogestad disagreed that the material has scale, stating that scale is based on perception built over years. co ti Ms. Wallace said she agreed with all of the findings of fact, except for the compatibility of the scale LO and massing. FM Ms. Zink did not find averages and percentages in terms of size and materials to be a valid way to Q evaluate. She thought the size and massing of the closest buildings were most relevant. She 0 commented that the changes made to the detailing helped the design, adding refinement that was missing previously, and tying it into the neighborhood better. Chair Dunn asked about the size of the fiber cement panels. Ms. Davis noted that the McHugh- Andrews House has also has larger scale pieces that are of similar size. ti Chair Dunn expressed concerns about the primary entrance, the setback and orientation of the doors, o in relation to section 3.4.7(F)(2). Mr. Lingle said pointed out that the public would experience the N building from an angle, and wouldn't see the alcove. Ms. Zink commented that a lot of buildings have an entrance with the door somewhat obscured. L a Mr. Frick said he loved the project, and was not too concerned about the entrances, but has a hard Q time justifying it with the Code due to the height, setback and width on this block face. a J Ms. Wallace said the proposed development it is in compliance with the Code, except for its size and massing. Mr. Ernest pointed out the varying typologies and heights within the area of adjacency. He referenced several sections of the Code, and said he finds the project complies, and that he would ca support the motion. Q Ms. Simpson expressed concerns about the height and setbacks with regard to section 3.4.7(F)(1), pointing out that it was setback on Oak, but not on Matthews. She appreciated the Applicant's efforts to improve the project. Chair Dunn found the height to be acceptable, given the range of heights in the area. She said she was struggling with character, but noted that the area is varied, and the project fits well with one side of the street, but not the other. She is still having some difficulty with the doors, but appreciates the articulation. She stated that the terracotta material is compatible with the brick, although she questions the size of the panels. City of Fort Collins Page 5 April 18, 2017 Packet Pg. 8 1.a Public Input John Gascoyne expressed support for the project on behalf of himself and his neighbor, Mary Ray. The motion passed 5-3, with Frick, Hogestad and Wallace dissenting. 8. 618 W. MOUNTAIN AVENUE, THE CROSE-SCOTT-DICKEY HOUSE AND GARAGE — CONCEPTUAL/FINAL DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a design review request for work on the storm windows and front steps of the Crose-Scott-Dickey House and Garage at 618 W. Mountain Avenue, designated as a Fort Collins landmark in 2013. The applicant is seeking a Landmark Rehabilitation Loan to support the proposed project. APPLICANT/OWNER: William and Kathleen Whitley Staff Report Ms. Bzdek presented the staff report. She reviewed the loan program, the proposed work, and the supplemental information provided by the Applicant since the work session. Applicant Presentation None Public Input None Commission Questions and Discussion Mr. Lingle asked about the double columns that were removed from the application. Ms. Bzdek confirmed that they had been removed. Mr. Lingle asked if doing the storm windows now would preclude them from doing the columns properly in the future. Mr. Whitley clarified that the double columns were not being considered at this time, but doing the windows now would not impact doing the columns later. Commission Deliberation Mr. Ernest moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission move to Final Review of the proposed work at the Crose-Scott-Dickey House and Garage at 618 W. Mountain Avenue. Ms. Zink seconded. The motion passed 8-0. Ms. Zink moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission approve the plans and specifications for work on the storm windows and front steps of the Crose-Scott-Dickey House and Garage at 618 W. Mountain Avenue as presented, finding that the proposed work (a) will not erode the authenticity or destroy any distinctive exterior feature or characteristic of the improvements or site; and (b) is compatible with the distinctive characteristics of the landmark and with the spirit and purpose of Section 1448 of the Municipal Code. Ms. Wallace seconded. The motion passed 8-0. • OTHER BUSINESS Chair Dunn asked the CSU students if they had any questions. One student asked how frequently the codes change, and what the process is. Chair Dunn explained the role of the Commission in relation to the Code, and stated they were last changed in 2013 and are currently being reviewed again. Mr. Ernest commented on how close the Living Oaks vote was. He also complimented Chair Dunn on her meeting management. City of Fort Collins Page 6 April 18, 2017 ti TOM 0 N 0 TMM J_ a Q u_ O co w FM D z 11 ti LO LO Packet Pg. 9 1.a • ADJOURNMENT Mr. Hogestad moved to adjourn. Mr. Frick seconded p.m. Minutes respectfully submitted by Gretchen Schiager. Minutes approved by a vote of the Commission on Meg Dunn, Chair City of Fort Collins Page 7 Chair Dunn adjourned the meeting at 7:48 April 18, 2017 Packet Pg. 10 Agenda Item 2 PROJECT NAME 305 CIRCLE DRIVE - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW STAFF Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposal to demolish the residence and attached garage located at 305 Circle Drive. The property was determined to be individually eligible as a Fort Collins Landmark. APPLICANT: Barry Schram, Lamar Valley Craftsman OWNER: Robert Russell, 305 Circle Drive RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the applicants have complied with all code requirements in Municipal Code Section 14-72. Because they have submitted all required materials, staff recommends approval without conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND: The owners of the property located at 305 Circle Drive, Robert and Catalina Russell, are proposing to demolish the residence and build a new one-story residence on the site. In accordance with Fort Collins City Code Chapter 14, Landmark Preservation, the property was reviewed on October 20, 2016, and has officially been determined to be individually eligible for Fort Collins Landmark designation under criterion C, Design/Construction. The proposed work was determined to be major in scope. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY: This 1-story single family dwelling was constructed in 1953 in the Circle Drive Subdivision of L. C. Moore's Third Addition to Fort Collins. The house is an example of an L-shaped footprint, ranch -style residence with attached garage in the Circle Drive neighborhood. This residence was one of the last homes to be built in Circle Drive, which was completely developed in 1955. The residence has many of the character defining features of the ranch -style including a broad, one-story shape, low-pitched roof without dormers, moderate -to -wide roof overhang, and asymmetrical fagade. This style of home was popular between 1935 and 1975. More detailed architectural and historical information can be found in the attached Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form. PROPOSED ALTERATION: The applicant is proposing to demolish the current residence with attached garage and build a new residence in accordance with the approved plans. PROCESS: Section 14-72 of the Municipal Code provides the process and requirements for the review of alterations or demolition of structures 50 years of age or older. Commonly referred to as demolition/alteration review, the process begins when the owner submits an application for City approval of the demolition or exterior alteration of the structure. Within fourteen (14) days of the filing of such application, the Director and the Chair of Item # 2 Page 1 Packet Pg. 11 Agenda Item 2 the Commission (or a designated member of the Commission appointed by the chair), determine if the proposed work constitutes a demolition or a minor or major alteration of the exterior. If the work is determined to be a demolition or major alteration, the Director and the Chair refer the matter to either a subcommittee, or to the Commission for a hearing. Prior to the Commission meeting, public notice occurs, and there are submittal requirements that must be fulfilled: a. A Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form prepared by an approved expert in historic preservation; b. Detailed plans and specifications describing and depicting the appearance of the site, structure or object that is the subject of the application, in context, after the proposed alteration or demolition; c. Evidence that all administrative and quasi-judicial approvals necessary to accommodate the proposed demolition or alteration have been obtained; d. A plan of protection acceptable to the Commission showing how the applicant will ensure that no damage will occur to other historic resources on or adjacent to the site. e. Applicable fees FINDINGS: Staff has made the following findings of fact as it relates to this application: • The residence at 305 Circle Drive is more than 50 years of age, dating to 1953; • The work proposed was determined to be "major," affecting all aspects of integrity; • The residence at 305 Circle Drive was determined to qualify for individual designation as a Fort Collins Landmark, for its architecture; • The applicant has complied with all of the applicable requirements. COMMISSION ACTION: At this demolition/alteration review hearing, the Commission shall approve the application for demolition (with or without conditions) unless such approval is postponed as described below. The LPC may impose conditions of approval requiring the property owner to provide the City with additional information to mitigate the loss caused by the demolition or alteration. Such conditions may include, but need not be limited to: • Comprehensive photographic documentation; • Comprehensive historical, developmental, social and/or architectural documentation of the property and the neighborhood containing the property; and/or • Any other mitigating solution agreed upon by the Commission, the applicant, and any other applicable parties. Alternatively, the Commission may postpone consideration of the application for a period not to exceed forty-five (45) days for additional information needed for its consideration, which information may include the opinion of the staff regarding the benefits to the City of landmark designation of the property. In the event that the Commission has not made a final decision within the forty -five-day period, then the Commission shall be deemed to have approved, without condition, the proposed work. SAMPLE MOTIONS: As directed in Section 14-72 of the Municipal Code, proposed major work to individually eligible properties is reviewed by the Commission at a final hearing. The Commission may approve the application (with or without conditions), or, in the alternative, may postpone consideration of the application for a period not to exceed forty-five days, in order to facilitate the gathering of additional information needed for the full and complete consideration of the request by the Commission, which information may include the opinion of the staff regarding the benefits to the City of landmark or landmark district designation of the property in accordance with Article 11 of this Chapter. SAMPLE MOTION FOR APPROVAL: I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission approve the application for final demolition/alteration review for 305 Circle Drive as presented, finding that the applicant has complied with all code requirements and purpose of Section 14-72 of the Municipal Code. Item # 2 Page 2 Packet Pg. 12 Agenda Item 2 The Commission may alter this motion to include conditions or delay the application for a period not to exceed forty-five days as put forth in Section 14-72 of the Municipal Code. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map (PDF) 2. Applicant Submittal (PDF) 3. Plan of Protection (PDF) 4. Architectural Inventory Form(PDF) 5. Demo Alt Review Form (PDF) 6. Staff Presentation (PDF) 7. 305 Circle Dr. Public Comments (PDF) Item # 2 Page 3 Packet Pg. 13 44, 1 .I w w O a w FM { i J Q Z O H J _ O r 2 I W `I n J a ElLake S LL _ r W W Y Uh Un pp 00 U) LO Q. S M 1111~^• L u O J +3 d t 305 Circle Drive N Landmark Preservation Commission Packet Pg, 14 May 17, 2017 1 inch: 1 s 2.b 4� m •rr QALMM Y ` IW tIYI r ' 1 m 1 M 1 MlwlMlrrl.bw 1 - ; I I I , I rOa•Yw I O�PbOIr - 1 wLj 1 I LOT M Iwyl rl I ' 1 1 El E3��;, T ,I it 1 4, a 1 11 S r1 b p 1 i u 305 ii n i1 u I •,Y•� yror... 11 II 1 I tiYwY —• 11 11 I •I _ I Mwi B1700536 305 Circle Dr. ! `'Pet�c�orf,ARn4swnr----------�-:----� \ --- - 1 i i VSPt.O-p Osed aaa pan q ..rYwe Russell Rusldunee LUAW Vaay cfara"m11 h101i�G14r0Y PLAN vun SP1A w w w Z 0 FEE Lw r J Q Z 0 FEE 2 w 0 Z LL L w w J U L 0 M 00 LO LID Oro 1000 Vi r� Q CL a E m m a Packet Pg. 15 2.b ABV. ABOVE AF.F ABOVE FINISHED FLUOR Acc, ABOW FINISHED GRADE AOd ADJACENT AM AGGREGATE A/C AIR CONDITIONING ALT. ALTERNATE ALUM. ALUMINUM AB. ANCHOR BOLT MOD. ANWIZE➢ APPROL APPROXIMATE ARCH. ARCHITECTURAL) A.D. AREA DRAIN ASPH. ASPHALT BSMT, BASEMENT BAT, BATTEN BM. BEAM MG BEARING B➢L BEARING PLATE, BASE PLATE BEL. BELOW B.M. BENCHMARK BVL. BEVELED BLKG, BLOCKING aD BOARD B.0 BOTTOM CP B.O.C. BOTTOM CP CURB BLDG. BUILDING CAB. CABINET CPT CARPET(ED) CB. CATCH BASIN CL CENTER LINE CM CEILING CLG. W. CEILING HEIGHT C.T. CERAMIC TILE MR. CLEARANCE CLo CLOSET COI, COLUMN CONC. CONCRETE (CAST -IN -PLACE) C.M.U. CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CORSTJT, CONSTRUCTION JOINT COWL CONTNUOUS OR CONTINUE CONTROL JOINT CORP. CORRUGATED, CORRIDOR D. DEEP, DEPTH DD DECK DRAIN DEC.(") DEGREE(5) DET. DETAIL DIAL. DIACONAL DIAL DIAMETER DIM, DIMENSION DR. DOOR OF DOUGLAS FIR OWN. DRAWER DWG, DRAWING E. EAST EL£O UECTRICEL) EL ELEVATION ELEV ELEVATOR EQ. EWAL EQUIP, EQUIPMENT EXH, EVIL AUST EXIST EXISTING EXPJ? EXPANSION JOINT EXT. EXTERIOR FMI FACE OF CONCRETE M.F. FACE OF FLOOR FHOLD. FACE OF FRAMING F.O.S. FACE OF STUD FO FIBERGLASS BNI FINISH(EM F.A. FIRE ALARM F.D.C. TIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION THE FIRE EXTINGUISHER REC FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FAT. FIRE RETARDANT TREATED DR' FLOORING) FLO. RJOUR FLOM DRAM FLUORESCENT FT O FWH FT FEG' FOOTFEB FOOTING M. FL.A FOUNDATION FP. PREPUCE FREEZE PROOF GA. GAGE, GAUGE GAIN, GALVANIZED O' GLASS, GAZING Mon. GLASS BLOCK M. GRADE. GRADING GWB' GYPSUM WALL BOARD HBO, HARDBOARD HOW. HARDWARE N D"4_ HARDWOOD MR, HEADER HTG. HEATING TVA C. HEATING/VENTILATING/AIR CONDITIONING HT' HEIGHT ITP. HIGH IT a N' HIGH POINT H.M. HOLLOW GORE Z ITO. HOLLOW METAL HB, HORIZONTAL H'W' HOSE BIB R' HOT WATER HOUR I.I.C. IMPACT ISMATON CLASS IHCH H I.Q. INCLUDE(D), (ING) INWL INSIDE DIAMETER INT. INWLATEG). (LON) INV. INTERIOR INVERT JAW. JANITOR JOINT N.O. KNOCKOUT LAM u. LABEL ATE(D) A Proposed Single Family Residence uN LINEN Russell Residence L LENGTH UN. LINEN LOCAT ION TOR v. Low POINT MILK. NµUFCTURE(R) 305 Circle Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 Mq5 MASONRY MO. MASONRY OPENING MAR. MAIERIgL(5)MAK Architect: MECH. MI R. MET. MECHANIIC(AL) MEMBRANE A DNA Design+Architecture Mix. Mix. METAL MINIMUM M'"°,E MIND 407 East Saturn Drive MINIMUM M.LU MM. MODERN LIVING °""(°`SK) MOUNTEDFort Collins, Colorado 80525 N.R.C. NOISE REDUCTION COEFFICIENTNCR.'OM.NOMINAL 970.443.5289 N. phone NE NORTH NORTHEAST NW. N.I.C. NORTHWEST K T?Q NOT IN CONTRACT NO. OR Y NOT TO SCALE NUMBER CC, DN CONTENTS) Information WC HP, OPENING OD. OPPOSITE O.A.OUTSIDE DIAMETER OVERALL PROMCTDATA: Pro FAMILIES AN ZONING : vMR. PARTnON GI PAVEMENT TYPEOFCOCCUPANCY uc 5 PERT. PERFORATED) q iLMNOMTL Pus. KNCLEFANITLY P.LAM. PLASTER PLASTIC LAMINATE Bu1LDINGCUDG 201E M02012 IBC TOM LOCAL AMENDMENTS PLT PL GL. PLATE LEGALDESCRPTION: PLT.NO. PLATE GLASS 3OCTRCIRDOOM AT PLYWOOD FORT COLLINS, COIURADO XB524 P.T. POINT PVC PRESSURE TREATED PARKING, P OF PCIYNNYL CHLORIDE REQUERED:NA PRUNMED.4 P L F POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT AA F, POUNDS PER UNEAL FOOT PROPERTY SETBACKS. P.S.I. POUNDS PER SQUARE FONT p,L, POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH XR CIRCLE DRIVE 15 PROPERTY LINE PROM RECP- SME 5 REF. RECEPTACLE SIDE 5' RUN. REFERENCE) REAR REG. REFRIGERATOR REINH REGISTER RESIT REINLIENT D).(ING) RET. RESILIENT nuuDwOlw+al I': 20' 6' TOPOFMA WRIDGETONEM'OUDE R.A. RETURN REV. RETURN AIR INOARLA B DAM R REVISION(5). REVISED �u.: 2276 IF ROW, RIGHT HAND LOWLL 11 HIDED R. RIGHT OF WAY TOTALF1N15NEDSF: 32xfi 6F R.D. RISER RM. ROOF DRAIN CARAGE PW OF RO. R.S. ROOM ROUGH OPENING LOWE41£VECUNPW SF I075 SF Stx ROUGH SAWN mint sn 0T 5SF SECC) SCHEDULE LOTCOVERAGE: SHT SECOND(5) WTSPE. 1AF555P SHOP. SHEET 0111LDTJG FOOTTRINT: XO52 SF SM. SHOWER WTCOVEXAC.EMI. 2] SQ SIMILAR sTC SOLID CORE a SOUND TRANSMISSION MASS S£ SOUTH SIN. SOUTHEAST SPEC. SOUTHWEST SO SPEOFICATKI SS. SQUARE SM. STAINLESS STEEL SR- STANDARD STOW. STEEL SD. STORAGE SIRUCL STORM DRAIN STRUCTIRAL TEL TOP. LEST BORING TEL. TOWEL BAR TV. TGEPHCNE TEMP. TELEVISION THK. TEMPERED THREE. THICKNESS) TWO THRESHOLD TO. BEAM TONGUE AND GROOVE Graphic Symbols To. CONC. TOP of BEAM TOO TOP OF CONCRETE Structural Engineer: TD Structural Engineering, Inc. 2909 Oxford Court Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970.372.1140 phone Issue Date: xx/x/2016 Project Number: 2016-122 Sheet Index: General Contractor: Lamar Valley Craftsman Fort Collins, CO 80521 970.690.8526 phone SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED FOR ALL WELDING& HIGH- Required prior to C.O. STRENGTH BOLTING. Material Indications T GLUT. TOP OF CURB T.ORLYWD. TOP OF PLATE T.OGLAB TOP OF PLYWOOD AWAC 705, ? TOP OF SLAB NEW M REQUIRED POINT ELEVATION BUILDING SECTION MASONRY: .W, TOP OF STEEL H9O50 REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER L.P. TOP OF WALL EXISTING PORT ELEVATOR (PLAN) ♦90W ' STORE VENEER T. MUST PAPER HOLDER TYP, TREAD EXISTING CONTOURS DOW TYPICAL ELEVATION NOTED ON HIGH SIDE - - - - Z�'D CERAMIC TILE UI UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE NEW CONTOURS FO5G WALL SECTION E L L VIE ELEVATOR NOTED ON HIM SIDE REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER MARY. VAPOR BARRIER VAPOR RETARDER T3-1 T CONCRETE: VS. VERTICAL TEST BORING OR Prt LOCATION �� VEST VERTICAL GRAIN LEVEL LINE-$- - - BUILDING ELEVATOR REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER LAS.O CONCRETE BLOCK VC.L VESTIBULE NNtt COMPOSTON LITE REVISION A CAST -IN -PUCE WC, DETAIL 4/A20 AND PRECAST MR. WATER CLOSET WINDOW TYPE O REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER m' WATERPROOFING) WAVY. WIDGHT COLUMN REFERENCE CRIDS LIVING O W. uO1TWElcnT caxc. W/ VETOED MINE FABRIC ROOM/ SPACE NUMBER 2D1 WEST. WIDE WIDTH GASH AND DOT LINE — - — WDW. WITH W'WM' WINDOW DASH AND DOUBLE DOT UNE — " — DOOR NUMBER iDZ O W/o WELDED WIRE MESH EARTHWORK: W/o WITHOUT DOTTED LINE ------- WD. WASHER - DRYER /\ UNDISTURBED WOOD BREAK LINE 10/A6.1y` INDICATES DRAWING NUMBERNNu INTERIOR ELEVATION �� ry/ DISTURBED REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER INDICATESHICH HFEi MEET STONE/GRAVEL STONES FILL CALKS IS SHOWN IIIIIIIIIHIM Glo GENERAL INFORMATION SET E)JSTINGIPROPOSED CONDITIONS SITE PLAN SP1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN AT WINDOW/DOOR SCHEDULE A2.0 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A2.1 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A2.2 ROOF PLAN A3.O BUILDING ELEVATIONS A3,1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A4.0 BUILDING SECTIONS MU WALL SECTION A5,1 WALL SECTION AB.O INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A0.1 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AY.O BUILDING DETAILS E2.0 MAIN LEVEL POWER B LIGHTING E2.1 UPPER LEVEL POWER B LIGHTING Construct per 201E IRO/City Amendments and Enginee's specifications INSULATION: BATT/BLAN KEY RIM MORE FILL RIGID FINISH MATERIALS: ACOUSTIC TLE GLASS CAULK AND SEALANTS: SEALANT W/ BACKER ROD JOINT FILLER SETTING BEDS: SANO/MORTAR/ PLASTER l Provide freeze protection for all water piping systems METAL: ALUMINUM STEEL LARGE SCALE STEEL SMALL $ LLE FINISH MATERIALS: FINISH WOOD ROUGH MAKING/ BIRG-CONDNUWS BL KIN BIDme- C N UOUS PLYWOOD - RC£ SCALE TEMPERED HARDBOARD PLASTERIBACKING BOARDS - SAND AND CEMENT GROUT WI LAM l GYPSUM WALL BOARD MI MESH 7-7gSBOARD FLOOR COVERING: RESILIENT TILE FLOURING 911111 CARPET DNA .- DESIGN+ARCF W9 W m 1,> W 0E Lu Eo =" Z 0 O Q U IL 0d W Lu ° Co � J Q NC h O \ z m Z n as O Russ 0 Reside S°5 CIMe 2 Lon Calmvl W CUMT Q Z_ tL cwxmrnoa E Lamar) Crafts W> Barry Si R90-0'. EGL CMIIns, Iw In W J 2 RUNWAY OR MAP U) U 0 /M� 0 (Y �U) Y/ V P MEN GENERI E INFORN Dec INUMMI 2016122 3 wAwx OT U) A}a�Y MA1¢DOT V SHEE B1I70�0.5 " CL �Y w^ W I_ VWW M fr �r Q Packet Pg. 16 2.b _______________ era LM my 11SP1.0 proposed site plan ecu[ yx•na B1700536 DNA DESIGN+n Cl W �m > LU ci a° ll l Z h o _ O C) H Q U �QN + 0 16 zLL LU a LU w �� J Q N Z Z am ❑ V R O J Rus O Resid 2 cbe: LU �^ J Q Z LL EW > Q W J U U W) 0 M Co LO Lo SITE PLAN zoisioz N o. ++ orT i U .Q SP a m E u �a Q Packet Pg. 17 window schedule *ROUGH OPENINGS TO BE 1/2" GREATER THAN FRAME SIZE MARK QUANTITY FRAME SIZE TTPE REMARKS NAMEUFACIURER UNIT/ A 7'-61YP-0' EEIFPA PACFC Cf -YFi F= B 3.".0 LA mw C 6'OM'-IT C# -6 R 0 6'4Wl4' CX -ID4 E 3'-OW-V LiL-36d6 LA:ETQIf E2 0)2H&W-6' LAT-3O>'.W'ALP-]OU' FDEO F 21-61Y]'4' LXPHMNQC HIM FIXED G 2-6'Wf L-AC-3024 AYNNS G2 2'-Op'-b' LfL-NY) LABFEVI H 2'4YYO C.AC.30N GME1flR J a)2'-bW-0' L-AL-3060,L-/L-3060 LA9EIElf K 4'DW2'-b'H'-Ow-6' L-AL-46'AF-kP-48q A'WIWRIAEp L (V3'-G4'-6' GtlYNAAP-b3VL.NRl65WILYW LbF.T iH mEDFD£DA2AE91Blf M 3'-G TNL IR4`iAll I I TPNLWI M1E& I.NL(iP➢Mi Y11HM®'RRAR LFYNHM 34'LF OL1'.R iD�7FM�FERLGt£. 1 riAzrtLuvawErar TO Ex®ps i VERRT SHAG IIFTH SOLVING RF/ATIP6 0 0 o� 00 0 O Ev 0 0 r1 door schedule *ROUGH OPENINGS TO BE VERIFIED NO. LOCATION DOOR MANUFACTURER FIRE TTPE MpYL µ1DTHxHEIGHT THICKNESS NAME UNITp RATING REMARKS 1111117�111111��111�111111�� -- "' .'®.' � "®" .®"' ® it .-•. UPPER LEVEL llllllu7�lllllll��lll���� �� 1111117�11111��111•���� �- llllll"J�lllll��lll•���� �- 1111117�111111�mlll�llllll�llllllllllll�� �- 1111117�111111�mlll�tll�� . .. �- llllll��llllll�l*R•" lll���� � MIEK VERIFY A-L 0.tiR5TOE0 NID M1GTLRYB WIH P HULRTOC•J.'61RI O u L VJ N i� ii 0 0 O B1700536 DN/ DESIGN+ARC LU W N W L) 0 W F8 z N= Lp_ IY ,c r + U FPO LL z/D LW d r w N J 7M z z O Rus: O Read, cRFWWmI.E W C' a. 0 z LL Lamar W Craft! > BRpyE 690.1 Fort Collins Q W J U U 0 M 00 LO LO WINDO SCHED rnE 2016122 OF }6 OT ,UM Na. V .Q A a a Packet Pg. 18 a' ovan v oaow �reuesn manage ne omper 2012 ennn9:n"" peRA12 Inc(Am nnemnnn R31022 Provide tlmin at below 9mtle polio gL'I N 1 2 li 2 cargarage located at grade level shown on Sheet A 2.1 7uau Gr MCNE EF wM l 11A4.1 T/A4.0 u'v 11A3.1 V 1/A4 0 RA"m' ❑ —m— gs 1pypg ❑ aioAeexbomlxeaNn 's ft 's O l em1¢sp@mpe 2912 R� O T WIC p ® S A OO RC Imam mb R31022 S FAR O xmB1 s 1Rvm' >• LIGHT § - 0 WELL s N-a 1m a- w w S BEDROOMil3 F LInd 3 • l3 3wY1 iw• ' BATHO l'03'l .. C Qx ' s LOWER D Afl COURTY --7--7 w '� O IINAa bNO ym 5 P PweLfcejel 9 m1f1tlY1NA1- - l L - I.I No ® PTY g ru Nelm IP ¢.In ea Sw• El4 13 sS A Roo. mE o�xm re< mi]91 ¢2V' mnwonuo g Up, Mmnnemmi. euLIIemu44?1wwrnan GwFm '. BEDROOMpA g or5m R.w.mn rm,� s� 9 _EE w ? EEE WLfaLhR 34d WLLLR3EF 91m'. - � eTORAGE w,H w• o '.. ©CR. -- — —a---- xw w�ilui GLOB s u __ __ '. eaub VtlEl4 CAMR LAv.I BFTHK4 - a Ava1£ WMF b' A4 arum nmrwelel e n mas snnl 10. g LAUNDRY 9ml IAI21RCSem P]QIA3 e¢OeeF 9 T-0N' w wN' S a %6' NIVI 0 mem)W. 3w ' 4 L9w' 9 L191 O g '. e 3 3w• 30• q MECH.- s Intlirztescatle ----- ------- § compliant egress u - r u - I I u II ii 3_i• miLR� III II YD#uER II UNFI D II Vi - MR T II 1E7 mx II b II ' II II II ll II II u n II II -II u II 3'e• s'a II I II II I I II I I a LIGHT a�wbewneoxwelanln - WELL ana mnneammuneNon O dmine9earmlernpu2012 FaMeomeCIUM22 - vn3.0 A mire aaaenmi.w•oc a VA2.0 lower level floor plan 31M.1 110A1 wM o 1/A4.o T A —]g B1700536 DN/ DESIGN*ARC W W H ; w W o Z O U + o � zLL W c L IS J w Q NP Z arm, z O 0 as J Rus Q Resid me: W cNnne xn z1 1, 1.� Lamar w Craft �1rv: eso- Forl Collin: Q W J U Fred 0 M 11 00 1.0 nre }r FLOOF E PLAN RxnME�x 3 aoE 2016-122 cn oT reOT SHEITNUMBERL V Q A;a c a� E u M Q Packet Pg. 19 See Attached Plan Review Comments Re: - Safety Glazing -Gas Range Hoods 8L i I I �O.FRva I 0PR` (2t CAR GARAGE O I I I E I rwfPw m'^ I I I LIMA \I L•N v LOWER STUDY COURT O Iml III III COVERED �I I� II'11 II®I�e LtWAF6 Cp MMRIXR TAT YN,IFR yMRMt e.CL ua ea MWM wm 1/A3.O: 9 M_ w x A V mw G@r.u+x®gym M yr e re LIGHT WELL �P. .6 Ir4 3 AI t '6dekiraxl5 mN. T1 XV TFF7 oil I I 4 .•a• ill 1 vAs. / (ToEN� , :rs..wnmeai.w I I Y r, III III I _. +...... � IMASTERBEDROOMalbdo IC3�r91.111111�CSI ENTRY PORCH Fol Ilaa na LL e'-f . 9' 11 Yd yi.y ^ I)MSNai FAYM1om si sc maoey sumere NMv m� jar o CR � 2 WELL MdNLEYd tP6ilbdX J I I I I� LOYRLL)EL wvwma�os 0 wvrf sro urtuams e•o• y aa• " ma 1iP � va (Main Floor) 1/A2.1 upper level floor plan 31AA.1 VA4.1 ZM.o vAa.o ecva vr•va• DN DESIGN*A W n Lu � m 7 W Ua W Z = p 0 U Q + e N Z LL W W ON J Z Z O � as RI 0 Res C PoGR W R O J� lumP Q 6L c o �00m a Lam; W Cre > Ban 61.� Fad Col �W// �$ LL U 0 M 00 (D L0 Twe�artas Tall \/ Pi@.Lle9fifin- FLo( E PLAT r rve� aoECM1612 ,^ wwvx✓OT *aVa �o . oK GT SHMTNUMBEF, t, B1700536 A Q Y c� i u Q Packet Pg. 20 2.b wall types NOTE: WALL TPES INDICATED HEREIN ME FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTOR PURPOSES ONLY RE: TO ROOM FINISH SCHE➢x1E FOR VARIATIONS W FINISH ASSEMBL W1-EXT. CORRUGATED METAL SIDING W muawTm IITu emus Immeraln EEw aE E Wena O•FRiPORTlI WNEMIIG' PE4 )m Y VA Pid1G BMO. bbG IIF: NRIO wW Wrx xcEuul� xwrRx Ma e.FNn mum rrom mn room® W2-EXT. T-GROOVF NFTAL SIDING WALL rraw.e rtru emm Iramv�o vleN � ¢EvmEnk) TEFiP6Y0Tx RNIMNG' PE¢)H WYAPt4W 6WB.btlG 11E 01FG LLIIN daN N [ELJL� NEen W RY umu+mew ram am S°ealm W}EXT. STEEL PANEL SIDING WAI I b E II INA MEE) BRFL PANELS III: FLNATbitl) MCPAW'BIRR DORI GOOI RANIN5 nw' PE¢b6 YUAMe fe IN WIILAWN GIIF: 01P10 WMtlLVI llYD£ MNMH NFL u.Fxnmum TANm ew evow® Instal W4-FOUNDATION WALL cladd ramulaRuurtw+maFl instal ULaEewaDGWaIT wLUIu smel floor types NOTE: FLOOR TYPES INDICATED HEREIN ARE FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTON PURPOSES ONLY. RE: TO ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR VARIATIONS ON FINISH ASSEMBLIES. F1-CONCRETE FLOOR ralc rFgmlrl:emr.I CYROHP4C1ER A1E E, oaR rawaamvee nl LSnRn o.ERumuru®wvuLmlL F2- CONCRETF GARAGF FI OOR ralc rLSIeNIrI:emlu OhROtAL VAYM PIAER O.EN [a1PMmbME DEO J oaR umbrlanxenwL mu F3 - WOOD FRAMED FLOOR RUx®IL0.RMNEcfFD o.2T h[rn GFdTXTe lE emll o.ER Iuv nur NMreu IRPoIRY.1 umPTNRurIW roof types J 1/A3.0 building elevation - south vA4.1 1/A4' 2bVO VA4.0 OWF. wxy.a- NO,E: ROOF TYPES INDICATED HEREIN l metal roofing material per ARE FOR GENERAL CWSEUCTON PURPOSES ONLY. RE i0 WALL SECTORS. DETNIS. S1NVClLRAL facturers installation specifications PLANS FOR VARIATONS ON ASSEMBLIES. Land012 IRO R905.10 (note req. for low PH- STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF d pitched roofs) ,0 BTRDMBEIHI&Tx RVM a9tawNE 1E ANm WTEt WED 4 oMReb 0.9E FPFNFd11fRiIR:OTAI'1 f�' R Lr9 AEWOFBBlmmSTb5NR51M Na1XN®)LLDY BN1Le11W Fie R2-FLAT ROOF— IEcwN"ILLrFAORmDinRZFsu1PI BITNMmareaaD NUPMN ruw.e III II PTxw IIl.swu RrLLmW I II C ommv,a 0T0fFE.mRC1 (BFI R9lm) M I F- W4 -T �I 4_____________________LI I III I I li I 2/A4.2 0 O) WJ m 2 risers allowed before reaching at other than main earess door. L. VM.2 (D W-2 Cable railing systems )vide maximum 3 inch between rails with inimum 4 ft. on renter. 31A4.2 II '. I4r//II i II II I `�I I IL ctll Lv L______________ I s/A4.2 wen u`GI D 2/1 building elevation - east --.`WI`a' B1700536 DNA DESIGN+ARCHI Russ( Reside) CII FoNCohnsG Lamar \ Craft o.ny SG 66a Fort Cdl'ms,S, BUILDIN ELEVATI 2ora)22 oT SOT A4 W W Z L0L �r 1.6 W J Q Z L0 r J 2 W 0 J Q Z LL 1 W 0 W J U U Ili O M 00(O��LYI U) Iln Packet Pg. 21 NAIL A r. Proademntmlletl Trades! ofwalertlsposal from roolsttlatwill mllecr and discharge roofdrainage ` to the ground suredce at year 5 ft tram foundation walls or to an approvetltlrlrmge rysfem(eg u gugerltlownspouls) Roof pith lthan 412requires (2) layers of underaymentorCudequirsent Issfolpi than 212 requiresroat 9 matenals installedper IRCSe:fiwR9Mpg annoffingromboarne) N Prowde manna moth ventilation per30121RCSeAroi M material per mi ructions and on R905.10 aLGF�If BIFl I `wvlro III I II I eaa I I II : _J L_______JL____ ,II �Ii II xaa wnxFl II I�I '. It II it I III I II I III I II I III I II 111 m I III IA I II I Itl G l'3 N]'d w. '3a III II I � i� vAa9 I I I I I I I II II m Fls++wueo I wrtxFl III' _ Brio vxrrc I II rrrtrcu I �I rum I I I wulau�re ___ f{ II II u II II i I III I qq II i II II II II II II J 6.OIAIWF YIA0.1 1IA0.1 vd &A0.0 ��E° 1/A4.0 rn 1/A2.2 roof plane/A2.2 roof plan LO1NXgR� DNA DESIGN+ARCI w y w o > L�u/ fJ vO LL �g Z u = O u � L r Q U Q 0 N Z wL U) �m r w �� J ❑ Q Q N � Z Om Z ❑ v `a O Rust O Reside uncle G ea w �wa LL Lamar w Crafts > Barry S 690E Fort Collins, LL w �j M 00 w LO Ln v SHEET mo ROOF PLAN �XEMIG-122 /^ OF }FV/ SOT i. .Q B 1700536 �A `` Q c a� E �a Q Packet Pg. 22 2.b 11M.0 zrrw.o 11M.1 WMA 1/A3.1 building elevation - north LCMf. W'.Y.p Lspacing are uy ury ouauing Max.I314 step down ran door to landing able railing systems allowed at male egress eM duos vide maximum 3 inch etween rails with imum 4 ft.on center. B1700536 DNA -- DESIGN+q Glil ILL W m 7 W w p Z e � Lz U U' 0 Q" Q ZLU 11 L > r � J ILL E Qwa Q �o Z �m Z a`a O J Rul Q Resider am. Si W Fort Wins, co 0 "' J z_ 6L wa mwc r Lamar \ W CraftW Banyso 690.a! Fotl Collins, W J U U 0 No DiSCRI�M M 00 19 LO LO N rr aUILDIM •� ELEVATI 20011owsw 1]2 co W ++ ,r wl�Nllffli V A3a c a� E �a Q Packet Pg, 23 2.b wall types t NOTE: WALL TYPES INDICATED HEREIN ARE FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES ONLY RE TO ROCM FINISH I SCHEDULE FOR VARIATIONS ON FINISH ASSEMBLIES W1-EXT. CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WALL ' I rgpGal&rflx MnaliraCa�pw.wOF: ¢Ev.,ImM I OhR 9P SiB18I RbPA1NLMJ o..Rmumcm»uerme.Mroc:eTIuu I v R-1 ' ve•c�Pael �A`�",u�ewm vas.o TO imLm W2-EXT. T-GROOVE METAL SI DING WALL 1 I L46Me XWMimm@JIDIxIRwecf Ara I M=. 1 ATTIC OVER IF MI R-0FdtN�xl .. wuimBn. u �e ax�mcaL �ml�iumpu try, sleet ggR �8 I .aaesmc 6B'4rRY1Po4®iNID 4W 9PM]Hl 03-EXT. STEEL PANEL SIDING WALL 1 I 1 bctlr nbHFPlIB3 Pb8!(R:6hAKM4 1 I \ 1 Oh OVER 9P51B1BIRGFi1NLM/ \ wEpmump a+bEG etLpe'x'ocrm•elNcl + I LAW-2 I I WA -FOUNDATION WALL I I rcvdxxunaRamw PxxtEG I I G.ER rotBo caraAreuvu�amlu rcme I / xcPm Fcz 1 Floor types xRr I NOTE: FLOOR TYPES INDICATED 1 1 HEREIN ARE FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES ONLY RA heROOMMFINISH 1 1 SCHEDULE FOR VARIATIONS ON 1 1 FlNISH A54].IBNES. 1 I Wd F1-CONCRETE FLOOR I � I raK6rt y<p GE mxu I I g9t6NLL VMFBWd9t I I Pld1WPKiOvdE vi lAC� I I was uoaNxsDxewuew To CONCRETE GARAGE FLOOR i w¢rxtE a,w �, smc� 1 1 OltlisnU VYYRad9dfR ._ __ __ �. w9t0.W.G1A)YQ M.SIRGL wa<MWa�PN.wLM. F3- Wom FRAMI D FLOOR 1/A4.0 building section RNam RazAssPeNm wai0.6RaE.n11GLZ SRCI nnwumenaFamr.� LAM uenn leurla WaRFresheaff Damersnall ce appre0 over my sNOS Orsxealhing Olall eMnorwalls. :I roof types story"aoa�: NOTE : RaDF TmEs IxolcATm xzxex nz u . ARE FOR GENERAL CONSTRUcnW PURPOSES ONLY. BddiA Sea RE: TO WALL SECTIONS. DETAILS STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR VARIA70NS ON ASSEMBUES. R1 - STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF a,EUCAaIxs ann xUfRSNBD Omal Mient Sale wuPaaarEaEo NO axP TRBMrww Sce atltlNonal lLMafuns on Roof Plan Sheef A22 eLaN N[6WFQ PLdhos R2-FLAT ROOF LEVIbu ON7Futa.9n AD metal womID VI 8® 1O MIYAlg1 wrnlaw uvr ei olBe axPBumaGas wsRRxPImTs�,enMcz All seal and spay Nam lnwMe Alum loe6N immum R-15 OI �i■ UNFINISHED BASEMENT 0 Per R501.3 R-1 o I — ATTIC STAIR 0 Insulate per Attached Prescriptive Requirements 2IABO r I I / fi EDROOM ME]W-2 I I 1 T I I I 1 Al 1 W.C. BATHN3 I I (1771 I I Ed idemlSon al lows' ovuteveiop plate only; Rd9lwuleAon to De used elseWAehenaac R-0'Blnsulallan aIHMadn a14e 0NII depth M1om top plate IO No plue nequlres use of Lased Vass Mel leneryy he I l 1 Pmmdd eavemmes Innd vlLd as eLmeamelnmlauon veined a r, aper2ot2 RO [Amendment) Nn 02 23 1/A4.0 building section Nat " B 1700536 DNA -- DESIGN+ARCH NWON ' W LL aO Fm W U� We =_ Z U' O all O u1 Z I.L. LU 2 o1 w o� J Q N$ Q E NO on Z Nw Z ❑ <a `0 r J Russ 0 Reside i0 me FOR Clde C W CLE0 N' J Q Z LL Lamar \ crafts W Ell 69D6! FOa Collins. W J NIX DESCRIPTION U U 0 M 00 1.0 Ln v BUILDIN SECTIOI PiDJECT NUMBER otstu OF _ Ny � .JM I U A4NINO c a� E is Q Packet Pigs, 24 Insulate per Attached Prescriptive Requirements -------------- See typical Secfion notations on Sheet A 4.0 See typical Elevation notations on Sheet, � an ll O , w-1 paternal 51 R ATTIC ATTIC Thal m IBERSIPC. :WdW IID9t stl L 6Rh �ta U �Beralles essential COVERED a DI G PATIOED 0 FWa<r" aaveanac I I I I LJ BATHM4 BEDROOMp4 o Per R501.3 w Fooras...Or, shall he pmmeee with fire pm&Non per Me potions of floor assemhb as may be unessential if fee earn area ones not ermee m square feat p ry�ana the penmaters of me unpruRaee arcs a fire barrel J!Rll�lon allowetl over gave lopd9 nsulallon to M used abe Rfib red ationlc It ul hepN fiom lop plateeguires use olmll hues heel) ATTIC Dovioe pare had am Roclm par alr pelmeahleinsuNNnln venlPoam¢cer2Rt2 IRC (PmeMmeltll Nil@23 1/A4.1 building section xwu, alera J I I 3/A4.2 Dal 1/A4.2 aa,pm _ Map as B1700536 DNA -- DESIGN+ARCHI LNLI des N `W LL m / LU Uo LU �0 Z U' O ao Z LW U 2m r la— LU �M J ❑ =M Q a Ne Z rem Z n O❑ > `a r Russ( Q Reside 2 (specialists 1,1 Fort(sail C 0 Goal J Q Z LL Lamar \ W Crafts( > Barry Sc 696-6: Fort(:dlina, W J U U 0 M 00 W 11) lln rr rc. a..1 r BUILDIN E SECTIV apparel NUMM 2116122 obri OT }a soev SKET '� I U A4a alai m FE M u �a Q Packet Pg, 25 1/A4.2 building section rus WOW See typical Section notations on Sheet A 4.0 3/A4.2 building section 2/A4.2 building section rus WOW B1700536 DNA DESIGN+ARCH PF Russ Reside CIWO am Fon Wllne.c UIEW Lamar \ Crafts Bass s< esae: FodC llllns, BUILDIN SECTIOI 201&1 z aam 0 A MMMM IS r E VJ <.i Q Q a c a� E U �a Q Packet Pg. 26 2.b 'head eave hafllasaM dock (or aM petmeaMlelnsulaNnln vent NaN¢per2812 IRC)Ame dmenl)Ni te223 M ng material perstallation specifications905.10 (note rec. for lowofs) 11/A].0 p f I i t t 1__ 1 Install metal/steel exterior wall cladding per manufacturers installation specifications AlrsealandyEay foam lnsulaNal rmpslsb minimum R15 "9m�iuyidom abcaF III 1/A5.0 wall section Y4F: YV.1'.T M or b'.�tw See Structural Sheets for Details Insulate per Attached Prescriptive Requirements N R-19 nsulmon al'a is ovutaverop plate only; R 49lwulalun ro Seus d elsewhere n adc R-0'8 insomlon CPnntt16 albWW In ar&B III depth Mom top plate �o totopplate(requires use of raised truss OlivalFidill;omedian YFM heel[eneryy heel) Parisi t E141pt I�"zcnwarrnrex 2/A5.0 wall section LHE.. NIHC B1700536 DNA .. DESIGN+ARCH W9 W > LU W o ~� Z CD O U Q + Y 0 W Q NY Q �o Z na Z � as O a. J Russ, O Reside 0 mum rat cdun,. c W 0 Q Z LL �.,a,.adeere r Lamar \ C efts) ; Derry sE aeoa ton colllna, W J U U 0 M 00 W 1.0 Lf) WALL SECTIOI MID aot 2016122 ,,�^ MIMM BY. VJ deoms ddi aor i amadosuorri V A1C alike � a c a� E �a Q Packet Pig, 27 1/A6.0 interior elevation - kitchen wus. »•4a• . 3/A6.0 interior elevation - great room 9/A6.0 int elev - kitchen island liy1 'n. M 2/A6.0 interior elevation - kitchen/great room SLNE WET). 4/A6.0 int elev - master bath 5/A6.0 int elev - master bath N�:>W.r� 2tl UEA.v W❑E materials legend PAINT LEGEND P-1 WALL PAINT P-2 COUNG PAINT P-3 BASE PAINT P-4 CASING PAINT FILE LEGEND T-I WALL FILE T-2 WALL TILE STAIN LEGEND ST-1 TIMBER STAIN MOD LEGEND ME-1 WOOD FLOORING M-2 WOOD ACCENT SOLID SURFACE LEGEND SS-1 COUNTERS IL HEFE NM FV.bW EPV .IUD IMD MINES ADa�NP � %-AF RI! 6/A6.0 int elev - master bath 7/A6.0 int elev - master bath 8/A6.0 int elev - pwdr YAE: M•dV YALZUE:1'O Y4F: 4e:l'O / �w A �aSTE W �CANNE1S �6MT.SIX `NEMWFI `IMLT_N CAVEM 10/A6.0 int elev - kitchen island m MENOMINEE NAME 11/A6.0 int elev - kitchen island 12/A6.0 int elev - kitchen island BENJAMIN MOORE-XXX BENJAMIN MOORE-XXX BENJAMIN MOORE-XXX BENJAMIN MOORE-XXX CAPCO GANNETS CARGO SOFT NO STAIN. NO FINISH METROPOLITAN -SPARKED OAK ANGORA DELTA MILLWORKS-WXWAIOOYAASATOR PENTEL-PEARL WHILE-POLISHED-BQ1080P B1700536 DNA DESIGN+ARCHI' PRWEcr Russe Resider Gmle SM1a MEW Fan cans., co Lamar Craft Banysd 6 Rod Collins,iI i Na DMOM"M INTERIOI ELEVATI PRUJE� NUMBER 201G122 w OT EE«EDRY A6 Packet Pg. 28 EXTERIOR INTERIOR EXTERIOR INTERIOR EXTERIOR INTERIOR EXTERIOR INTERIOR EXTERIOR INTERIOR 1/A7.0 window head - corrugated metal sidinq 2/A7.0 window iamb - corrugated metal siding 3/1 window sill - corrugated metal siding 4/A7.0 window head - t-groove metal siding 5/A7.0 window iamb - t-groove metal siding beoda:1 N'•Fp [GYS N'•I'0' YNEd N'•I'0' X-F 110'•1'tl ise N'•I'O EXTERIOR INTERIOR EXTERIOR INTERIOR EXTERIOR INTERIOR 6/A7.0 window sill - t-groove metal siI 7/A7.0 door head - corrugated metal siding 8/A7.0 door iamb - corrugated metal siding YLE:INNC YNEIldi MNEIili CAIMMUN IN 11/AZO roof fascia �nlUn I 12/A7.0 wall trim n,l MnlUn BGNE.I n•.r0 v tp Noi IWi WewRd9MZle h R-Mi shovedInwd depth note on p�enduse of aeed nus 1)heelei N EXTERIOR INTERIOR 13/A7.0 base trim ecusllml'a• Insulate per Attached Presc iptive Requirements Glazing shall be inslalletl per CAy of Fatt Collins Fenestration requitemetlts See notations @section view sheet A4.0 B1700536 DNA -- DESIGN+ARCHI W ce W o W U LU OE Z = O U' 0 �Q + ° �Z/^� LL LU ILL V/ C� Q Nma Q O � Z m Z l7 a `a O H "T J RUSSE O Resider awe She Fart Callim, Co LU J Q Z 1, 1L mrrtwcrort r Lamar \ craft W W Barry Sc 65P8 Fort Collins, W J U U M 00 .(D 1Y/1/ YI mre fl �. BUILDIM •� DETAILS w.JENi 201e-122 VJ oT � Mwi OT e U Ala c a� E U �a Q Packet Pigs, 29 2.b �GE � MR, LOWER A OSIAB ON cCHAO, I PAAO OTHERS BOLKLE CAR I I I I Y I I I I PATIO IL OTHERS SCLATE wwnE ixo BAnoN I I I r I I ` FROM LIEN ARROW �,B vENTER 444Z Tow wE%TlUlB_ L I 81 1 E < �I si 3 I I a �I I rvl I FI I scxaosrt¢w1wr� t I zl �I a I_ m L ,-- - I I L ---I- -¢svi� wwMN,fx1 2' 1 B , wuTl LREWFN12CIP��wwNxn"" BE)FO A325BOLTSl g NI w B�E�ENT � I 31 bI w sS ao STEEL WLMNPLATE I TE BASE �invsa PABOmwlal em,2aFENHET m4EAV el UFLATE 8 -ASS S�cx m STEEL Co,w..w �— ;mmw: BASE FLAT[ P) r Wwe.m ALP wa OR a BEEN B weTS P ss PORCH N AI w«a®Far 0C I gl I �I asua uncE ml c v 117 Pww>' wuTl L s I I I --- _ c ET�— w,°wR. I �•, STEEL COLUMN I� 10 iRni«a BERuh WD..Nw I SQ RARE uaTE wp,)ww,r CIP IL- 3 roenrwF n_B. aRw I DA xx NBOITR CAR rrmNxrsF RAre wa1 a o�"+ia� Aazsx sous l VO o25NN BRETS EXTE e I 31 I 8 F� w2TT4GA)KF TOW PLAN N FOUNDATION PLAN D ST ENGINEI Lu 290 o. TRUE Wifins, molou 970.an.v�,dswmN W w m �� Qpoo 1 0 'Roo U181 a -$ 21611] FJq 04 1 Lu L o J a Z 0 V 0 VLu LuQ U 0 Z Lf) LL W - 1 V Lu 4 W In /� N � M ^ ♦) V) Lu � J a B�wE M 00 g w 9 Lo U) FRDTER) BY }I ry Darzru® Rr: - RENEWED RY: WTCHUE BUTTE rae ISSDE: VN2017 coRJABABm Eourvonnol (a (i B1700536 S1. Q a E r a Packet Pg. 30 2.b igemrd: . ll construction seal be in accordance with the memabonal rgiaeNal code (2012 eUtion) and in accordance with all applicable Dena regulators. 2. the contractor shale crack and verify all dimensions shown on this plan prior to concrete placement and shall reference architectural plans for Remainder etc. 3 all eRetlor walls and interior bearing walls as noted on the pan shall be constructed as outlined in iy:S021 O3 method 3_ hali rein or plywood one side with min. 12' gypsum wallboard (method 5) on the opposite side. 4. all interior shear walls as noted on the plan shall be constructed as outlined in irc r6021 O8: min. 12- gypsum well boardon Mth sides ostered per tame rh 3(l) to design 1. foundaton design is based on the geoteMnkal engineering report pretwrecifmthe site by COS Engineering Co"m of Loveland, Colorado putproject no 16-841. all the recommendations inchded in this rgwn sheau be mnsmered m be pan of these spe lia0ons. the geotechmal agmeer should be contacted to veidy soil combine are roustabout the report recommendations prior to co Lu bn. maremmumbearingimpandity-1500ped minim um dead lad = Soo bad 2 design live loads: roof snow load = 30 Pail, floor bad = 40 Ps( vend = 100 mph (a:nnal 3 d, expor seismic design metal th. e founda0a specification 1. all footings to bear on soil prepared in accordance with mutuanial report mate footings at elemtion to maintain minimum 3' between footing bearing and groundsAer as remmmented in gerotechnical report. 2. the f bundaion movrtion shall be observed by the gerotechniol engineer of record. 3_ foundation walls to be backfilled In accordance with the recommendations In the geoteachnical report 4. below grade foundation walls bads head on one side only (baseants, crawl spaces, garden levels) and be darpproofel with a bituminous material on the exterior of the wall. 5. fill material under slabs on grade shall be an approved material placed in accordance with the recommendations in the geoteanial 6 report compatriots shall be provided in accordance with ad recommendations z it is the comrectors naidrt to hdorm ma owner of ins otembl Por lama a doe possible movement and the reaNmrs to be taken tom ootmtame pate er Dose �e on On ecanstrudwn instathe i� floorthe ownershall assume ell Ask olslab on Orede mnstmction aSenon lerng-erng dome wa space Dose songmesou a pmvide0 vAlM1eslim joinE," void) at the bottom of the wait 9. a perimeter drain shall be instalod mound the basmimt as recommended in the geoteatical report and as detailed on them plans d. mate ia6 1. foadarbn amide: rc = 300o that foadrtmn to - 40000 garage slab m grade, Minimum of 5-114 sacks of type b'a Left anon[ per mtic yard, air entrained with 6%1 1A, air 2. rdi rdng steel by = 60 of (60 grade). all reinforcing shall be placed in accordance with ad recommendations including minimum laps, spa anger and comer bens. 3. structural steel: 0.vms a992 50 of yield strength, plates: ache a3Q 36 of yield strength; Pipe columns: asim a53, 35 of b. -studs - load beefing 8 e.bdor walk ,rate no 2 construction grade. c. studs - interior nomend 0.vMg-2a4 standard grade. emng and bridging-no.2 e lami nated veneer lumber(LVIR shall bestress graded asfolows: bencing-2600psi, tension pudial to grain -1the i; compressiZn ppaarallel to0 rain of elasticity h rmaredlshear - 285psi; compression perpendicular grain - 500psi; compression fueled nsi lus Her menber suns are net, lumber stirs are nominal. g I foots shall as as mandactured by Trus Joint or an approved suhRiMe I foists shall be detailed by the foist supplier included bddging, droved and web than details and shall as Installed in accordance wltb the manufacturers recommendations. If timber connectors called for on the draeings are as manufactured by Simpson companyconnectors ey other mnufacturers may be used the load capacity is aNal to or greater than the connector specifieduse manufacturers bmidend nails and bolls. '_ fasten all word members with common narks according to the Wilding code unless otbervnse noted I_ roof sheathing shall be 15132" sheathing rated for exterior use with an APA man rating of 32116. nail roof sheathing an 8d naib at 4" on center at panel edges and 12- on center in the field u n o. k floor sheathing shall be 23132" plywood with an Al rating of 4824, glue and nail to flaming Birth 8d adds at 6' on center at prod edge, 8' on center in the field u In a. I. exterior wall sheathing shall be 711 So note or pltmmod miktl to framing with 8d naib spaced at 6" on center at panel edge, 12-on carter in the field minimum a na. are i�no- �c Rm`A,TE val oenaaawe. Oxemut OF THICK Cam RATE W [ D Par He T a mutesai[t�i SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRE] FOR (OL WELDING A HIGH - STRENGTH BOLTING. Tor AT — —_ PAN WNT — ra1w14,lar lNaaz �,,.Ra� we Al -_ Ad- I I 0. ®_ seen I q I gBoffivas amW ;3F _my, as AE�sm=__ �rt :alre— AWEIN —x — ----r By EI 81 PUT 40 re}'mlm. _9 _ azs[rurt uMi 21 blu,lioal Me nTHEN RATE eons Art TO T BUD (IJETE JEND fiPnw ease PTATE 1(22)) lul N O� FLOOR FRAMING PLAN B1700536 ..o�aaeon re.Pdeaeon m. P�P..ry�rro.ro,.w,ai rnP���nm. m� m �wm.In which dowadcormentywhousionsarred cry sameneve shounn..e,y..l.u. o..n wp. by any Ivory r..m mmboatany wbwmwa o.thin occurrence discovery, in wined. n haver, as stback d.rsa.noro+vrecassznher -nl. �ea&m PAn-m is nn.ur PRnvbted,mwl u.w®e,western convert at m nnwal Enowe.iny ow at Northern mloado D ST NGIN LU 2900.mrd4 ` Fort cdlirs.mmn TearzaL mawdm W W Z eOL o r 38181 a '9 21 7 \ L J lanneen- a LU O FEE 2 w w p U J w; a o� z I— 0 LL LU J 1 q LU LU In /� V) M p LU � J U W U U) IWw W LID U) FRDIECT }1 DEstcruED By. Ry: RP/IFNED BY: DATE Wi Real /1 VN2017 �L REVCHON: 3 GENERAL NC Y MAIN FLC FRAMIN S2a .cL Q a E a Packet Pg. 31 2.b OVE FULL ro� OO« Aw I I I I p I I I I I I I I I I > �1 _ N IIIIIII I I I I I I I IIIIIII I I I I I I I I 211�LERcEOIOST! w 0EFFIRFOvs_ FOUNEVVION FOR OPENINGS > TRIVAlli MROJIR PIAN N ROOF FRAh D I. Is.,��x.� �,boA� .i�,._,� 4���I arm in ��aIas,�ma,.�moayfIn����„iWtheA dmnnay .a .o.,.w .,m�., m�.., ��o. �� aamaRov.,aoaxamy Rais.fix m.go.binding oaIa B1700536 FRDIECT MRPER DESIMM Br: RP/IEWED RY: OFIE WiISGIE: VN2017 ROOF FM PLAN S20 w W w z O H w H J a z O FM 2 w 0 J a z LL w w J Ci U) O M Co w Lo L0 Packet Pg. 32 2.b mnem. n.m i-LJ. °m.w 9n for red nim - operator mee wA -4any i, z la: are ere :A ban by `cR '� ..ems IaImI=oI Ef 244ta " e artreem 3prE"a1€4t? J _ am by jr in pattern month 44 � o 15 par M, arm her pro do dowayeas ce�pre _ to oc� I'd 15 UPICdI patio wall detail t4 courtyard planter wall nwerml ahen"th24 a,. a�m w0 aa4 wra9m oor g�z4 warn 0"' aea Qea per pain zx4tat emem mallat,am Ran ion wmnAaprmnm.w c413e ranro ar ,I kl �� x n'+t'wben se, I f .I.b -- g areaardre0 Wonz . in her pro s°c Ired. pnlFOR FOOTING yApE AND he m interior pad detail (6 entry foundation 5�3y -+u S3�/ -,u k'm ft ell 2 6re"vne wentor r °e kning, her A�.v Membrane IF, 11 tr pne parry height train c, gI @We aradiation rfaemea aap tab bear phe --- Am — anbarren.au l,b4 here goal 12 de,x _ E 11 xn a4tae shonjunitat a€ home under 'wua��m .l C.�et _ r" rtm�'' uat " sl _ z = fa4 - rer.w L' re,fae°:emmm rewn i a,pN w°8 n @ia °e. yet pan ream°a ear plan typical walkout wall detail (6 partial ht. wall D ST 24on tab ENGIN I W 1 rre�wnn° 2,6 trertmp zsre o.fora� 970.372.11 IY 11 - Irani bar .rmwmw W Royal bar Ep pnceraee -lei Y 1 wpea we Z u �yt 0 Jay hy the 0i wi � h j " e C12/!�7 £ rw m by treat�,>r °c es�:e °1 t W ex, farm, =UTZ territorial, r my ly;' 1 -E Q ^� go II li I,I, a Z g` ,fl m0 I' >sLL mmacepm pn m. pn mean" duarestcrpn u ^ 13 courtyard stair section 12 tall courtyard wall 11 tall garage wall 0 -0 1 0 W ma.,mnm.� W Q W big Mi a�l.rtert li�I(~� > fail by hi waZ bad ° lb a "�� .LQL ,election Go photomontage, �=Aft Vegetation, lb aw W treatment re herabibigh hormai imiian I inin, vawu W ztA sR `omam fa Royal - _ U �/ general rewn s=mem pI _ €s :uwm za J gg global par LU 1I1 LL _ Qemw report a4u � at M a, e L m L x. m nib a W _ par �� ,�fa. rt�R La.di araboare reF 'Par^ o. b ceutages �pre 0 a window well foundation wall °° wn are a foundation wall Mail s door foundation detail ^ 39 _ � g g _ 4r40.m'z4`is4� p: Ron fin page, trip of M wribitar,rderi of bee ibeer morning any ,wrpm labor marmy, mandate, —III—IIF IT' • 00 ,,4, H - - --------- r �2 z tan La gmai f MM U) 6 '"> ®,s� th rt r it "� � brai prior . m a �' I f g " mpap, no�aa Ao FFUCIJECT LI1— a nensary: ER amnm�zaoeDESIMMB'(: 1244@24in parent or lz E Irani at re E 48rz4yxaJ onmmeab° MCFE Wt KoAJ6 '° hedre portrait, zyzov '°"o-t°rmat°� n zm.wrt g O 1, L — ,V}^Jfl roun 3v I rdr wmy an rfaememnal°wn a 8Cso, mopi w,LFOUNDAT + °°'a ' DAIL �� em¢�°e (i _ I counterfort detail full Al basement wall parallel to joist full ht. basement wall rQ -0 S30 cL Q a B1700536 a� E M u �a Q Packet Pg, 33 2.b floors 8 lipe "Frei HZ3J7 floor beam detail =,a Ounel edge, moppi ON 01 1" pipsyl 6�,, doube joint , too Conti N.,mimb, si bblocking Alm, to No of � dh poputer .aam No byroo, Not boom @ea byrow, to on pi It Lost none ff di "iourn ,.a.s not of toy nei Ngth it both bend perinchamble columm nor" BFAM CONHE� IXI SCHEDULE P"'. 1,11 SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED FOR ALL WELDING & HIGH - STRENGTH BOLTING. FCM4,),rzre sus uwa mk Nie sm.emD hre mrewm m, NPmD2 mkpsla,yy' Ipslaa byona perinchamble typical beam connections deck lateral connection 0 (6 t ical beam brace detail 3. a=w pi oppi sock, Not m;�woffte �KKn wm�ehllm�R, i re= md, foods Not typical comer bar reinforcing -,a Drossi ns.,�iscon dounhent, on why. mron not, by any N of to IM 1 for 2-2.6top wM /'61 floor bearina i?,,2-Io Nh� Of !4ONN fP AT ungEntistop s If into pri .��w bothro, we &nterior non -bearing walls at slab on grade m W U z w W , o1 �o LuW W � U J U W to Lf) O V) m �o�i ON My 'L—J_Ir a ON HIM _ h'w24y ON *MM FRNGNEDBPER DESIau® Rr: RPAEWED BYb�€DAIE RR ISGIE: 2/Y20ll REVIEUMit a� "'- it e= EourvonnoaeFLOOR ERA DETAIL itypical wall step reinforcing exterior pilaster detail S3 . the orop.•n a.o.se,.e,al En ,�my ned�eM,..n.a¢e.�.>einthis aew„ea,cipon�ra..,n-ich n� maee.a,.e. PRo,.ea. An <�.w«me.e.,k. fish. o... part. I. of a;�mo�� f"�_plebie��o�isAneu. prnin��.a,ne�i..w,te.consent ofM n,et,.ei Engi.ee.ies. Inc of Niolorer. B1700536 `W W W z LO r Q LW r J Q z L0 r J 0 2 W 0 J a z LL r W W J Ci c.i U) M 00 W 110 LIM iL VJ Q Q a E m ar Packet Pg. 34 2.b �wpn III _ Rwanda wasons mnn:3' W 131;e � .3zsnbm�� ���� e fill whisto a8,e 3'w We.e lal of nr Wn top view oe fealI s s;:mow, w afil tMF game rateraing, camp, areary+awnere�Im mh ma thus maim. n®sn n�� fil armmare ..IF mr, door section AA assured 2@3 1 age norms e:m s W e bereseend eeae III bssme hall A top , real e/ X, rateso or �z`mmi 4oe. genummucefich" J redeemA I �U,oIF � ".!re,v q`ve r ceam am paI Ruder n earAame @ SIN. IF (b rafter bearing & truss ledger detail de umm 3'e A3zsR bam m stteel beams and column connections o SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED FORALL WELDING & HIGH - STRENGTH BOLTING. meanLas —: (6 rafter to beam connection 3. ,a p brty rufgmAom chopernfigh mum trial cemn la ryR IMF F Red aeM fifigarl do drawn @26 aa. DMES44all Far am mu, ®®z�`e,oural Ruder to Ism all hanger to ledger fill ",: @ III amusing am mutant %1 rafter. & truss bearinq connections 3. =w Far and, gas ses, A fill... firm, muldbut fightes frion, I hi: a end From drop toor of thus to agreed Famous 2 date Ism, M@1 phumeee bioait,dy message truss bearinq gable end lookouts Gs heanvall at roof =w diamonds, all I Fromernal moral and a.w abaa. am maeannann aroma and all normal nearrandavmTosmbal E,zarmasdr,�Mne a�e,x.Rb.u. e. .:emu,..amm,m,✓a,. np�`e z..m-�.xn �. rv��x_�_ mermen¢,m.hoieo.mwrt.bv+ma®�.ma�...m aan�aa.av�M npi�o.<hemear«aaaa.an, �a.mi. a.�a wrt. •=amn�mvre�z ���a-��a�iaby o�opss �amw�oRn�n��r.un.:ome....�n.o�nra�m rz�awai E�yia.:-s.B1700 W U z w w 0� LIF)� W w U a' J U LU Ln O V) M FRDIECT NIPPER DESIGNED Or: RPAEWED RY: DATE Fqi ISSVE: VN2017 ROOF FRAI OE[AIL S30 w w z O NQ I.L LW r J Q z O FM 2 W 0 J z Um 1 W W J Ci c.i O M 00 w w v Packet Pg. 35 2.b FRC(i NU P R DEi3i Or: RP/IEWEO Ri Di OR IS E: VN2017 LOWER LE SHEFR WRIT Drawarys, samonal notes andaufne anstraments 4. A cloall ..a than pohmorty oOT3 Anotural Anneasong, Im, Cases of throw Mayes for the dent am fiation clients was in thry obtain xnew ar which them doccurninta wom amparal eoroi.. �.who. o. �. w2 by am Assay whaticamer m mmm.�..v ode part or the �✓.�m...e ,i.. .o... par, as d....00.uVa fission�Telone baling p.p_-tsi.Sn.tlyp.n�b�..neob.un.�e....be..oa.m of m rzr.mai Arm roar I of Corr B1700536 w w W z O a w J a z O FEE 2 w 0 J a z LL w w J Ci U) O M O W La L0 ME r+ r+ E iL Co a Y I� V CL CL a us c a� E u M Packet Pg. 36 2.b FRDIEbi NUMBER DE31i Rr: RPAFNED RY: DATE WiUSGUE: VN2017 MAIN LEVEL WALL PL S4. Draways, shanyhol notes naloutone inewficany any 4. Ail shal rearroon low pruipmearty uFTEn Anytharal Ini Cases of thenin Mayes the clect any far the forms, any in the afthy Anewt bor which theas docurnarty way posparad Pror are of thess chounneys, in who.o. . fort, nvany Ama by construct any Cob pent or Ina way ✓.bus.ninant, in shareo. . par, as slock Mo. ..nrae+vre i For AMm.b.iiains proposals is nnnry nRnibited,.awbwith the shamans warren .oa.m of m rznmai Em�.o..iry. Inc of Northern Colo B1700536 w w W z O Imillain w lannan a z O FM 2 w 0 J a z LL w w J Ci O O M CO W O O ME r+ r+ E iL CO ^all Y I� V CL CL a us c a� E u m Packet Pg. 37 2.b S I I rlPlta' �a w w w z O FEE w J Q z O H J O 2 w J Q z w w J LO 0 M Co CD LO LO E 7 Co C� Q Q a E m m a Packet Pg. 38 2.c City of Nns F6rt Coth Planning, Development & Transportation Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Plan of Protection for Historic Properties Project Title: Russell Residence Full Property Address: 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins, 80524 Form Prepared by: Nick D. Benson & Olexa Tkachenko 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Description of project location: The Project is located at 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins Colorado 1.2 General description of work to be performed, including which firm(s) will be doing the work: The current home and garage will be demolished, and replaced with new construction described as a single family home with (2) car garage. The residence will include a basement. Firms Architect DNA Design + Architecture — Olexa Tkachenko 407 e Saturn Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-443-5289 General Contractor Lamar Valley Craftsman — Barry Schram 2620 Brush Creek Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80528 970-690-8526 1.3 Building(s) or portion(s) of designated and eligible buildings within the area of adjacency that will be affected: Demolition will proceed from South to North. Excavation will proceed similarly. Is building adjacent to other buildings or structures, on or off site, and if so, how close?: The only building neighboring this property is a single family residence to the north. That residence is located approximately 5' from the property line as required by set R3 Submitted Ap Packet Pg. 39 2.c backs. The proposed residence will be 5' from the property as required by setback resulting in the structures being approximately 10' apart. 1.5 Are any of these other buildings or structures 50 years old or older (which ones, and what are their dates of construction, if known): The build date of the neighboring structure (single family residence) is 1952. 2.0 Scope of Work Describe the work, and how it will affect any historic building(s) (both on the subject property and on adjacent properties, if applicable). Provide descriptions on each of the following, as applicable: The current house will be demolished and removed. A full basement will be excavated, and a new residence built on the some site, in accordance with City of Fort Collins setbacks and guidelines. The proposed residence is of an architectural character consistent with the neighborhood, including minimized building mass with low sloping roofs. Architectural elements such as entry porch and fenestration reinforce the local vernacular. The building forms and architectural elements speak strongly of the past historical precedents while the building claddings give the project a distinctive current character. 2.1 Demolition: Since the house is single story, the demolition will be easier to execute than a taller structure. The house will be removed in a carefully controlled demolition from south to north. This directional method mitigates the chances of flying debris since the house itself acts as a barrier to the house to the north. Access will be via the alley so minimal damage to curb and gutter is anticipated. The demolition sub -contractor has a long working relationship with Lamar Valley Craftsman and understands our demolition protocols. Construction fencing and wattles will be installed. 2.2 Site preparation: The concrete slab and foundation will be removed and recycled to the City of Fort Collins recycling facility. 2.3 Excavation: Soils testing has been performed by CDS Engineering out of Loveland, and the results show well compacted soils which will not require any additional shoring beyond typical excavation practices. The basement will be excavated an additional five feet beyond the existing foundation depth to allow for a new basement. 2.4 Utilities: Existing water service and sewer service will be reused. Gas line will be upgraded per Xcel Energy requirements. Electric service will be upgraded to current standards per City of Fort Collins Light & Power Department. R3 Submitted Ap Packet Pg. 40 2.c 2.5 New foundation: The new foundation will be reinforced concrete with three egress windows plus a double door to a small courtyard. 2.6 New construction: The new home will be wood frame with a mass and roof line consistent with existing adjacent homes. Fenestration is tastefully balanced in size and location on each elevation. Solar photovoltaic panels will be installed. 2.7 Parking lot: Off street parking will be accomplished by the new garage accessed via the alley to the west. 2.8 Driveways/alleyways: No driveway will be installed off the street. Since the overall footprint of the new home is closely matched to the existing home with attached garage, the new driveway will be an apron that extends to the alley that runs South to North. 2.9 Landscaping: The current landscaping and established mature trees will be preserved in the front yard. Only one tree in the rear yard will be removed. 2.10 Drainage: An upgraded drainage has been submitted to City Planning staff and approved, which is included with this plan of protection for viewing. 2.11 Other: None. 3.0 Coordination of Project Activities 3.1 Name of person or persons responsible for overseeing the demolition and/or construction activities: Barry Schram, owner of Lamar Valley Craftsman 3.2 Will they be on site when that work is occurring? Yes 3.3 If not, how may they be contacted if needed when that work is underway? Barry Schram @ 690-8526 3.4 What specific coordination practices will be used to coordinate work activities? R3 Submitted Ap Packet Pg. 41 2.c As Project Manager, Barry Schram will coordinate all the needed requirements with the demolition sub -contractor prior and during the demolition phase. 4.0 Deconstruction, Salvaging & Recycling Materials 4.1 Which historic materials will be deconstructed and salvaged? Retrospect's Historic Survey did not discover or report anything historically significant with this structure per § Vl, 37-42(a) and therefore it is not significant to be registered with the National Register of Historic Places. Deconstruction cost proposals were obtained but not financially feasible for the homeowners. However, Berthoud Habitat will be salvaging the rear patio doors, front door, kitchen cabinet doors and rear awning. They have previously salvaged miscellaneous other items. Some of the structural Douglas Fir Lumber will be harvested post -asbestos abatement. These materials will be re -purposed. Fort Collins Habitat is also taking a variety of light fixtures, ceiling fans and miscellaneous interior items. There is a possibility that the rear patio pavers may also be re -used. Concrete from existing slab will be recycled at City of Fort Collins facility. 4.2 Which historic materials will not be salvaged, and how will they be disposed of? Composite roof shingle, exterior brick, sheetrock, interior trim and cabinetry. 5.0 Protection of Existing Historic Property How will you ensure that historic buildings, structures, and surface features will not be damaged during work? What means will be used to protect them? Not Applicable, since the existing house will be demolished, no actions to address stability or integrity and structural stability of various parts of the house need to be addressed. 5.1 Site Conservation — Exterior fence will be preserved. 5.2 Demolition of Building —Entire. 5.3 Foundation Stability — N/A 5.4 Structural — N/A 5.5 New Construction — New house will be built on the site. 5.6 Historic Openings & Materials — N/A 5.7 New Openings — N/A 5.8 Floor Framing — N/A 5.9 Roof Structure and Roof Framing — N/A 5.10 Structural Loads — N/A 5.11 Supporting and Bracing of Existing Structure; Under -Pinning — N/A 5.12 Excavation and Shoring of Existing Structure — N/A R3 Submitted Ap Packet Pg. 42 2.c 5.13 Site Cleanup — Barry Schram will be responsible for ensuring the site is clean, which includes managing fugitive dust and cleaning up stray debris. 6.0 Documentation for Record 6.1 Does the project include measured drawings and/or photographs? The project will use detailed Construction Documents created by an architect including structural design drawings. The documents have been submitted to the building Department as part of the building permit process, as well as to Historical Preservation Office. 6.2 Where will these be stored? Hard copy documents have been submitted to the Building Department and to Historical Preservation. 7.0 Archeology How will you address archeological resources if they are likely to be present or if you should unexpectedly find them? If discovered, the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery will be contacted immediately. R3 Submitted Ap Packet Pg. 43 2.d OAHP1403 Rev. 9/98 COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY Architectural Inventory Form I. IDENTIFICATION Official eligibility determination (OAHP use only) Date Initials Determined Eligible- NR Determined Not Eligible- NR Determined Eligible- SR Determined Not Eligible- SR Need Data Contributes to eligible NR District Noncontributing to eligible NR District 1. Resource number: 5LR.14126 2. Temporary resource number: N/A 3. County: Larimer 4. City: Fort Collins 5. Historic building name: Williams House, Ostertag House 6. Current building name: None 7. Building address: 1305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 8. Owner name and address: Robert J. and Russell Catalina 305 Circle Drive Fort Collins, CO 80524 II. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 9. P.M. 6th Township 7N Range 69W SE % of SE N of SE % of SW % of section 13 10. UTM reference Zone 13; 494233 mE ; 4490763 mN 11. USGS quad name: Fort Collins, CO Year: 1960; Photorevised 1984 Map scale: X 7.5' 15' 12. Lot(s): Lot 63 and the south 35 feet of Lot 64 Block: Not applicable Plat: Circle Drive Subdivision of L.C. Moore's Third Addition to Fort Collins Year Platted: 1945 Parcel Number: 97133-27-063 13. Boundary Description and Justification: The site boundary corresponds to the recorded legal description/parcel limits of Larimer County Parcel No. 97133-27-063, comprised of Lot 63 and the south 35 feet of Lot 64 of the Circle Drive Subdivision as platted in 1945. The parcel encompasses the single-family dwelling and attached garage at 305 Circle Drive as well as surrounding yards and landscaping. The site boundary encompasses the area associated with its historic residential use. III. ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION 14. Building plan (footprint, shape): Irregular 15. Dimensions in feet: Length: 75 ft. x Width: 30 ft. 16. Number of stories: 1.0 17. Primary external wall material(s): Brick 18. Roof configuration: Gable -Side Gable Packet Pg. 44 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 19. Primary external roof material: Composition shingles 20. Special features: Porch, chimney, garage 21. General architectural description: This historical property consists of a single -story, single family dwelling constructed of wood frame and clad with brick veneer, with a relatively low-pitched side -gable roof. The house has an L-shaped footprint, with an unusual, canted rear porch, as well as a long, attached, perpendicular wood frame rear wing that extends back/west from the north end of the house. The latter rear wing extends all the way to the alley, and includes a front -gabled garage accessible from the alley running behind the house. The house rests on a concrete foundation and lacks a basement. Like some other homes in the subdivision and other post -World War II residential neighborhoods, this dwelling is clad with rough -textured buff - colored brick. The roof covering the house is clad with asphalt or composition shingles. The eaves along the long front and rear elevations substantially overhang the walls, but are flush at the narrower gable ends of the building. The gable faces are clad with vertical boards or wood paneling. Rectangular louvered roof attic vents are installed beneath the side gables. A large interior chimney made of similar rough -textured buff -colored brick exits the roof peak near the north end of the house. All of the various windows on the house are rectangular in shape with brick header sills; however, all of the original windows appear to have been replaced with modern vinyl units. The long east -facing facade features large projecting square -sided window bays at each end, and a nearly full -width recessed veranda -style open front porch. The portion of the roof covering the recessed porch is supported by a series of painted 4x4-inch wooden posts with substantial angled wooden braces just below the ceiling attachment points. The main entry, which is equipped with a modern door and storm door, is nearly centrally placed within the recessed front porch. To the right/north of the entry are two windows: a long, narrow rectangular single sash window placed high on the wall, and a very large, three-part window. To the left/south of the main entry are two identical small 1 x 1 light casement windows. Within and at each end of the porch or veranda are identical, large, slightly projecting square window bays, each containing a large three-part window with tall, relatively narrow sashes. At the north end of the fa4ade, just beyond the recessed front porch, is a large, square -sided, substantially - projecting window bay that contains a large three-part window composed of a large central sash flanked by narrower sashes. The south end of this projecting window bay contains a secondary access door to the house, which is currently equipped with a relatively crude door made of boards and battens. The narrow south elevation is fenestrated with two different types of windows: near the front end of the elevation is a long, horizontally -oriented three -light window placed high on the wall, and further back, extending to the house's southwest corner, is a very large four -light window. The latter window is part of an enclosed glazed rear porch with a similar large window wrapping around onto the rear/west elevation. The north elevation is fenestrated with two similar fixed horizontally -oriented one -light windows placed high on the wall. The north side of the perpendicular rear wing is also clad with rough -textured buff -colored brick, suggesting that it is an original portion of the house. Packet Pg. 45 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins The rear/west elevation includes two entries. One, sealed by a modern door and glazed storm door, is situated near the south end of the house, adjacent to the large, four -sash window that extends to the dwelling's southwest corner. To the left/north of this entry are two, identical small 1 x 1 light casement -type windows. Farther to the left/north of these windows is a recessed rear porch covered by a shed roof extension supported on the corner by a painted wooden 4 x 4 post with angled wooden braces. Within this porch is a large, sliding glass door. At the north end of this porch is a projecting room with an angled wall; the west -facing portion of this projecting room is fenestrated with a square, 1/1 light window. The long, perpendicular rear wing at the north end of the house is covered by a relatively low- pitched gable roof. This wing is accessed on the south side by a door placed near the intersection of the house and attached wing. The south exterior wall of the rear wing is clad with modern wide synthetic clapboard siding. Only one window is installed on this wall — a horizontally - oriented fixed single light unit located near the east end of the wing. At the rear/west end of the perpendicular rear wing is the attached front -gabled garage, also clad with wide synthetic clapboard siding. 22. Architectural style/building type (duplex): Ranch -style 23. Landscaping or special setting features: This house is situated on a rectangular parcel that is bounded on the east by Circle Drive, and on the west and south by unpaved alleys. To the north is 315 Circle Drive, which contains another one-story brick -veneer Ranch -style dwelling; the two houses (305 and 315) are only 10-12 feet apart. The parcel for 305 Circle Drive (Parcel No. 97133- 27-063) consists of one entire platted lot (Lot 63) and the south 35 feet of Lot 64; the resulting parcel measures 95 feet (north -south) x 110 feet (east -west), and encompasses 10,450 ft2 (0.24 acre) of land. The property lacks a driveway, since the garage faces the alley running behind the house. Like many early post -World War II residential subdivisions, Circle Drive was laid out and constructed with very narrow (2.5 feet wide) concrete sidewalks. These sidewalks are too narrow to accommodate baby strollers or two pedestrians walking side -by -side or passing one another. The yards surrounding the home are attractively landscaped. An old, pebble -surfaced concrete pathway leads in a serpentine fashion through the front yard from the sidewalk to the front porch. The front yard is planted with grass, and accented by several medium-sized trees. These include two deciduous trees of undetermined type(s) south of the winding pathway, and a small cluster of well -established aspen trees north of the walkway. The back yard is enclosed by a modern cedar picket privacy fence approximately 6 feet tall; gates are located on each side (north and south) of the house, and another gate is located adjacent to the garage near the rear alley. The back yard features a wide, open patio adjacent to the house's rear elevation, that is attractively paved with multi -colored (earth tones) cast concrete rectangular pavers, of various sizes. The patio extends west into the backyard, and a wide footpath of the same paving material begins on the south edge of the front yard, leading west to the gate on the wooden privacy fence. A hot tub has been installed in recent years, on the paved rear patio, and the hot tub is effectively screened by a cedar picket L-shaped privacy fence similar to the lot perimeter fence. L 0 LL 0 a> _ Ta L 7 U a� U L a _ m E U M El Packet Pg. 46 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins The property is situated within the historic Circle Drive Subdivision of Fort Collins, which is a largely intact early post -World War II residential development located on the north side of, and accessible from, Prospect Street, a major east -west thoroughfare in the City. Circle Drive is so - named because it was laid out as a lozenge -shaped, asphalt -paved loop roadway lined on both sides by one-story Ranch -style houses, most clad with red and/or buff -colored brick veneer. Most of the houses in this distinctive small neighborhood are covered by low-pitched hip roofs; some have gable roofs and a few have flat roofs. The neighborhood, which still retains quite a number of unmodified houses, presents a relatively uniform appearance and contribute visually and culturally to a neighborhood identity. 24. Associated buildings, features, or objects: None IV. ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY 25. Date of Construction: Estimate: Actual: 1953 Source(s) of information: • City of Fort Collins Building Permit No. 13330, issued on March 31, 1953 • 1966-1976 Larimer County Assessor's online property record for Parcel 97133-27-063 • 1977-1984 Larimer County Assessor's online property record for Parcel 97133-27-063 • Current Larimer County Assessor's online property record for Parcel 97133-27-063 26. Architect: Unknown J U Source(s) of information: No information found 27. Builder/Contractor: Colorado Builders, Inc. LO Source(s) of information: City of Fort Collins Building Permit No. 13330, issued on March 31, rCD i 1953 co 28. Original owner: Edwin Williams LO Source(s) of information: City of Fort Collins Building Permit No. 13330, issued on March 31, 1953; City directories o 29. Construction history (include description and dates of major additions, alterations, or LL demolitions): This single-family dwelling was constructed in 1953, eight years after the platting o of the Circle Drive Subdivision by the Northern Colorado Loan Association. On March 31, 1953, the City of Fort Collins issued building permit No. 13330 to Edwin Williams to "Build 30 x 75 c [foot], brick veneer, 7-room, 2 bath residence: no basement, 2 car attached garage, cedar shake 61 roof, concrete floors, plumbing, heating." The estimated cost of this construction was $15,000, which was completed by contractor Colorado Builders, Inc. The 1953 building permit verifies that the garage behind the house adjacent to the alley, was always attached to the house, and Z that the entire rear wing is part of the home's original design. The perpendicular rear wing, Q including the entire south elevation and 14 foot -wide by 20 feet -deep garage has been clad with wide, non -original synthetic clapboard siding. The only other change noted was replacement of the original doors with modern units and storm doors, and replacement of original windows with same size vinyl windows. The date(s) of these improvements could not be determined. Q 30. Original location X Moved Date of move(s): N/A Packet Pg. 47 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins V. HISTORICAL ASSOCIATIONS 31. Original use(s): Residential — Single Family Dwelling 32. Intermediate use(s): None 33. Current use(s): Residential -Single Family Dwelling 34. Site type(s): House 35. Historical background: Built in 1953 by Colorado Builders, Inc., this rambling one-story Ranch - style home is located within the Circle Drive Subdivision of F.C. Moore's Third Addition to Fort Collins, which encompassed 42 acres at what was then the southern end of the town. Circle Drive was officially platted on December 7, 1945. The Circle Drive [residential] Subdivision was platted several months after the surrender of Japan which finally brought an end to World War II. Circle Drive was a real estate project of the Northern Colorado Loan Association. At that time, the Association was led by President E.W. Moore, and Secretary Rodney Hughes. The original design of the Circle Drive Subdivision is shown on the December 7, 1945 subdivision plat (attached). When fully developed, it contained a total of 62 new single-family residences. All but one property has a Circle Drive address; the other is designated 613 East Lake Street. The temporal pattern of development is shown in the table below. As the data show, the first home in the subdivision was erected in 1945, but a big flurry of construction followed in 1946, when no fewer than 29 houses were built on Circle Drive. Subsequently, construction activity slowed during a several year -long period in the late 1940s (1947-1949), when only another six (6) houses were built. The pace quickened in the very early 1950s (1950-1952), when another 23 homes were built. The last three homes in the subdivision were erected between 1953 and 1955 — one in 1953 and another two in 1955, at which time Circle Drive was completely developed. The house at 305 Circle Drive was one of the last to be built in the subdivision. Residences Built in the Circle Drive Subdivision, 1945 -1955 Year Number of homes built Number subsequently remodeled 1945 1 0 1946 29 12 1947 0 N/A 1948 2 1 1949 4 1 1950 8 2 1951 10 2 1952 5 2 1953 1 0 1954 0 N/A 1955 2 0 Circle Drive is a classic early post -World War II subdivision, with an atypical street plan featuring a flattened loop road, which contrasted with Fort Collins pre -World War II grid pattern of intersecting, perpendicular north -south and east -west oriented streets. All of the homes built were of similar size and general design; all were single -story Ranch -style homes with low- pitched hip and gable roofs. Hipped roofs were predominant (33), while another 25 homes had L 0 LL 0 a> c Ta L 7 U a� U L a c m E U M El Packet Pg. 48 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins side -gable roofs, and three featured flat roofs which represented a new trend in low -profile Ranch -style domestic architecture of the early post -World War II period (from c. 1945 through the early 1960s). Another distinctive characteristic of Circle Drive was the emphasis on the use of brick and/or brick veneer as the exterior wall material. Virtually all of the houses were "modern" in appearance, and lacked elements representative or suggestive of earlier architectural styles. The Circle Drive Subdivision was clearly intended to be at the vanguard of the early post -World War II residential architectural aesthetic which was prevalent throughout the United States as population growth and postwar prosperity created a widespread building boom all across the nation. The original owner of 305 Circle Drive was Edwin B. Williams, a salesman for the International Paper Company, who shared the home with his wife, Faith E. Williams. The Williamses only remained in the house for a few years; by 1957 the home was occupied by Reverend Edward A. Groves, Jr., and his wife Laveda H. Groves. Reverend Groves was then the pastor of St. Luke's Episcopal Church, located at 200 South College Avenue. It appears that the residence at 305 Circle Drive had likely been acquired by St. Luke's Episcopal Church as a parsonage. By 1960 Reverend and Mrs. Groves had left Fort Collins, and the Circle Drive house was being utilized by Groves' successor, the new pastor Reverend Edward F. Ostertag, alon with his wife Caroline. The Ostertags remained at this address for approximately a decade, from c. 1958 though c. 1968. They ultimately had three children —Anne, born in 1954; Robert, born in 1957; and Emilie, born in 1963. The situation changed in 1969, when Reverend Ostertag and his wife Caroline moved to 1304 South College Avenue. In that year (1969), 305 Circle Drive was occupied by Andrew and Veronica Miscio. Andrew was employed as an appraiser for Harold Jungbluth, Valuation Consultant. Jungbluth's business was based at his home in the Terry Lake subdivision, situated on the shores of the sizable north Fort Collins -area reservoir named Terry Lake. By 1971 Andrew Miscio had changed jobs; in that year he was employed as a salesman for Hansen Real Estate, owned by William H. Hansen and based in the First National Tower building. By 1973, the Miscio family had moved to another home located at 1209 Stover Street, and the new occupants of 305 Circle Drive were David G. Philips, his wife Charlene, and an infant child named Kasey. David Philips was then employed as the principal of Moore Elementary School, located at 1905 Orchard Place in Fort Collins. The Philips family continued to live at 305 Circle Drive until c. 1981, when they evidently left Fort Collins. In ther place were Duane F. Elbrader, a distributor for Four Season Log Homes, located at 5100 North US Highway 287, and his wife Millie, who also worked for the log home manufacturer. By 1983 they had moved to the log company property on US 287. In 1984, the Circle Drive home was occupied by a policeman named Bobby Emerine and his wife Yvonne, who worked as a job manager for a company called Plastec. The Emerines lived at this address only briefly; by 1985 they had been replaced by Richard Hicks, an employee of the Fort Collins Country Club, and his wife Nancy, who served as a teacher at two Fort Collins -area schools, including Lincoln Junior High School (1985) and later (1986) at Riffenburgh Elementary School. Subsequently, for approximately one decade, from c. 1987 through c. 1997, the residence was inhabited by Gerald DeLaHunty and Marna Shillman (no occupations listed). By c. 1997, Peggy Packet Pg. 49 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-13.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins Dunn was identified as the lone occupant of 305 Circle Drive (no occupation listed). Then, from c. 2002 through 2106, the home was reportedly occupied by Julie L. Hedelson and Jana Kay Thomas. The situation changed in early August of 2016, when it was evidently sold to new owners Russell and Robert J. Catalina. Shortly after this ownership change, the Catalinas sought to replace the aging home with a new house on the same lot. The Catalinas evidently hired a building company called Lamar Valley Craftsman to demolish the house for replacement with a newly designed modern house. An application for a demolition permit from the City of Fort Collins triggered the need for this documentation and evaluation of this historic home. Because it is more than 50 years old, the City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Department required this documentation to be completed in order to assess the property's historical and architectural significance, and, should it be razed, to serve as a detailed historical and architectural record of the property. In February of 2017, historic preservation consulting company Retrospect was hired by Lamar Valley Craftsman to research and document the property onto this Colorado Architectural Inventory Form. 36. Sources of information: Beier, Harold 1958 Fort Collins, History and General Character. Research and Survey Report, Part 1. Prepared by Harold Beier, Community Development Consultant, Fort Collins, Colorado, for the City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Board, April 1958. City of Fort Collins Log of Building Permits, 1920 —1950, on file at the Fort Collins Local History Archive. Fort Collins City Directories, for the years 1917, 1919, 1922, 1925, 1927, 1929, 1931, 1933- 1934, 1936, 1938, 1940, 1948, 1950, 1952, 1954, 1956-1957, 1960, 1962-1964, 1966, 1968-1973, 1975-1976, 1979, 1981, and 1983-2016. From the collection of the Fort Collins Local History Archive. Larimer County Assessor 1962 Property Card for 305 Circle Drive (Parcel No. 97133-27-063). From the collection of the Fort Collins Local History Archive. 1968 Property Card for 305 Circle Drive (Parcel No. 97133-27-063). From the collection of the Fort Collins Local History Archive. 2106 Property information record for 305 Circle Drive (Parcel No. 97133-27-063). Accessed online, January 7, 2017. Simmons, Thomas, and Laurie Simmons. 1992 City of Fort Collins Central Business District Development and Residential Architecture Historic Contexts. Report prepared by Front Range Research Associates for the City of Fort Collins Advance Planning Department. L 0 LL 0 a� _ Ta L 7 U a� 2= U L a _ m E U M El Packet Pg. 50 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins VI. SIGNIFICANCE 37. Local landmark designation: Yes No X Date of designation: Not Applicable Designating authority: Not Applicable 38. Applicable National Register Criteria: A. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history; B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. Qualifies under Criteria Considerations A through G (see Manual) X _ Does not meet any of the above National Register criteria 39. Area(s) of significance: Not Applicable 40. Period of significance: Not Applicable 41. Level of significance: National State Local Not Applicable 42(a). Statement of significance National Register of Historic Places -eligibility: The house at 305 Circle Drive does not embody sufficient historical or architectural significance to qualify as individually eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). This residential property is associated with a significant historical trend, i.e. the nationwide post -World War II building boom and the development of new residential subdivisions featuring "modern" Ranch -style domestic architecture. This significance applies to the entire subdivision, and the residence at 305 Circle Drive would not individually qualify as NRHP-eligible under Criterion A, although it would be a contributing element of a NRHP-eligible postwar subdivision in Fort Collins. No archival evidence was found to suggest that this dwelling was owned, occupied, or otherwise associated with any persons who would be considered significant in terms of Fort Collins, Colorado, or national history. Consequently, the property would not qualify for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion B. This house is an atypical example of single story brick post -World War II Ranch -style residential architecture in Fort Collins. Its design features a very long facade with a nearly full-length veranda -type open front porch; this is the only example of that design in the neighborhood, while there are many other replicated house types in the Circle Drive subdivision. Other than being a single story, relatively low profile home with brick walls, the residence is not a distinctive or especially representative example of post -World War II Ranch -style domestic architecture, and, therefore, it does not qualify as eligible for the NRHP under Criterion C. 42(b). Statement of significance Fort Collins Local Landmark -eligibility: This residential property is associated with a significant historical trend, i.e. the nationwide post -World War II building boom and the development of new residential subdivisions featuring "modern" Ranch -style domestic architecture. This significance applies to the entire subdivision Packet Pg. 51 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins as well as potentially to individual dwellings within the subdivision. Because it is representative of this significant historical trend, the property at 305 Circle Drive qualifies as individually eligible for designation as a Local Landmark under Criterion A. No archival evidence was found to suggest that this dwelling was owned, occupied, or otherwise associated with any persons who would be considered significant in terms of Fort Collins, Colorado, or national history. Consequently, the property would not qualify for Local Landmark designation under Criterion B. This house is an atypical but noteworthy example of single story brick post -World War II Ranch - style residential architecture in Fort Collins. Its design features a very long fa4ade with a nearly full-length veranda -type open front porch; this is the only example of that design in the neighborhood, while there are many other replicated house types in the Circle Drive subdivision. Because of its design, this residence is a distinctive example of post -World War II Ranch -style domestic architecture, and, therefore, qualifies as eligible for Local landmark designation under Criterion C. 43. Assessment of historic physical integrity related to significance: This historic dwelling has been minimally modified, with only updated (modern) windows and doors. It clearly retains integrity of location, design, materials, and workmanship. The property is located within the Circle Drive Subdivision, which is a remarkably intact early post -World War II residential subdivision in Fort Collins. As such, the property also retains very good integrity of setting, feeling, and association. VII. NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT 44. National Register (individual) eligibility field assessment: Eligible Not (Individually) Eligible X Need Data 45. Is there National Register district potential? Yes X No Discuss: If there is National Register district potential, is this building: Contributing X Noncontributing _ 46. If the building is in existing National Register district, is it: Contributing _ Noncontributing _ Not Applicable X Vill. CITY OF FORT COLLINS LOCAL LANDMARK ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT 47. Local Landmark (individual) eligibility field assessment: Eligible X Not (Individually) Eligible Need Data IX. RECORDING INFORMATION 48. Photograph numbers: 5LR.14126- #1-93 Negatives or digital photo files filed at: City of Fort Collins, Development Review Center (Current Planning) - Historic Preservation Department, 281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80524 49. Report title: Historic and Architectural Assessment for 305 Circle Drive 50. Date(s): March 15, 2017 51. Recorder(s): Jason Marmor 52. Organization: RETROSPECT Packet Pg. 52 Colorado Cultural Resource Survey 2.d Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 53. Address: 936 Wild Cherry Lane, Fort Collins, CO 80521 54. Phone number(s): (970) 219-9155 History Colorado - Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation 1200 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203 (303) 866-3395 El Packet Pg. 53 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 7 iM, + , also .-ra i--- — � ;, 5 h ■ ,g+[ l,' .F ,. r : �r t , �r e q 7;' � '�a � I 1 It - J% i��,T .S '.. .- � ]j}(r Q ,t, y :.c'Gi F' �;. e ..�.5 ✓.. O IN F '. j YJ:1 �L'-�rl Ifs :l .r � _! . �, � 1 ��'^ YY « ��.y.;� "t r 1. � �� ... ate\\ ... •— +I ORA 305 Circle Drive .. r DRIVE ITV` Q Y a., 1• � �_� 1 y'1 it.. " 5LR.14126 I y n ,1i�r '` a` �-� �II��J� 1�1_ _ -• f ` '._1tiJr� �: k /tf �r`r ��r i� 1 ) iligh i� ' s.r ,fie` ��r`>�'I�� � � = f --- � ^' �g �✓• ��� ''—„ - M Edom 'W r N Kc ' "--/ _� i}S- grktiari. C �044.�. 4A 'I' KOii[Fi ROAOI .✓ \ p V Location of 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins (51-R.14126), shown on a portion of the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5' Fort Collins, Colorado topographic quadrangle map (1960; Photorevised 1984). W W Z 0 W H J g Z 0 FM 0 W Z LL W W J U LO O M W W LO LA E L 0 LL L 0 m rM zo Packet Pg. 54 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-13.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins Circle Drive Sketch map of 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins (51R.14126). zo Packet Pg. 55 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins r u _ v F S15iiA 'it n i .,...I I... .. .. . uk .. _ ... �.�. ,ram s a .... - .. .._.... _ .... ..... ,. r.. � iWrD ADD J!ON trsj.. Orry I• .. L... ...,.... +.a.a.�... rr.... .+.... - •a L�:i..0 }� ..... ...... .... 1945 Plat of Circle Drive Subdivision, from the Larimer County Clerk & Recorder's Office. Arrow shows location of lot containing 305 Circle Drive. L O UM L O 4+ C C M L V W f+ L U L Q f+ C E L U El Packet Pg. 56 1 I•�ilk I -•,✓ gam 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (51-11.14126), looking northwest. 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), looking northwest. El Packet Pg. 58 r II�'�II I' l 5 ! i r r+ T y. f t Fix p ,1r rg$ to, 1.�1 FIT III l`I ��y :r 1l s ` „teezr� �L r Uj r. • ` '` Ilk 0 1 - Lim V%- 164, � elk � � 1 , :w=w IBM P Aiy/ t I ILL WIN 7 =s` No Text 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins fr I ka ♦ ? p-z.�G LTL^i ba. ' w Q,yti 4 S:.�aw Y♦ .ei" 4. 305 Circle Drive (51-11.14126), projecting room with large window, looking west. r j � r^ Ii f ,f� 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), interior of front porch, looking northwest. LU w W z 0 w J z 0 FM 0 W z LL W W J U LO 0 M W W LO LO E L O LL L O C W C L V W L a E U M 4=0 a Packet Pg. 62 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins ..._..�- 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), entry on south side of projecting room on fagade, looking north. w w w z 0 w H J a z 0 FM J 0 2 w J Q z w w J U LO 0 M W w LO LO E O LL L O C d C v W L Q C w M U �a a Packet Pg. 63 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), close-up of front porch ceiling, looking north. L O LL L O ++ C C L V W f+ L U L Q f+ C E L U El Packet Pg. 64 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), looking interior of front porch, looking southwest. 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), front porch, looking southwest. L O UM L O 4+ C C L V W f+ L U L Q f+ C E L U El Packet Pg. 65 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (51-11.14126), looking front porch, looking northwest. i F ; y 1 'y l t $ `,� 1, �f.'.. !' .'a5r✓.. J,�'�l"%1'i2ir1".tD. i s'°-1�. 1 �.'_-. .t: L.. 305 Circle Drive (51-11.14126), front porch, looking southwest. Packet Pg. 66 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins c , , 305 Circle Drive (51-13.14126), close-up of vinyl window on facade. LU w W z 0 Q w J g z 0 FM 0 2 W J Q z W W J U LO 0 M W W LO LO E L 0 LL L 0 C W C L V W f+ L U L Q f+ C W E M U a Packet Pg. 67 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 101 � - - �Or� ro �M/�►bad Wool I cos 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), main entry on fagade, looking west. LU W Z 0 W J a z 0 FM W 0 J Q Z W W J U U LO 0 M W W LO LO E L 0 LL O C d C L V W f+ L U rM Q m E M U �a a Packet Pg. 68 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), large three -sash window on facade, looking west. LU w W z 0 Q w J a z 0 FM J 0 2 W J Q z W W J U LO 0 M W W LO LO E L 0 LL L 0 C W C L V W f+ L U L Q f+ C W E M U a Packet Pg. 69 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins r- i 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), front porch, looking northwest. JV V LU w W z 0 Q w J g z 0 FM 0 2 W J Q z W W J U U LO 0 M W W LO LO E L O LL O _ W _ M V W U L Q f+ E M V El Packet Pg. 70 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive. Fort Collins qi - ,rtr - w � r1,77 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), front porch, looking north. w w z 0 w J a z 0 FM J 0 w Q Z LL w w J U U LO M W w LO LO E L 0 LL 0 A�� W` c El Packet Pg. 71 No Text 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins Ab 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), north elevation, looking southwest. 1 yE 305 Circle Drive (51-11.14126), close-up of window on north elevation. LU w W z 0 i= Q w FEE a z 0 i= J 0 2 w 0 J Q z LL LU LU J U Ln 0 M W W LO LO E L 0 LL 0 C W C M L V W L U L C E M U El Packet Pg. 73 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins him= - 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), close-up of window on north elevation. 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), fence on north elevation, looking west. Packet Pg. 74 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), close-up of window on north elevation. 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), fence on north elevation, looking west. Packet Pg. 74 ,% e 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins i 4 �r�, If ' r 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126),south elevation, looking northwest. 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), south elevation and paver path to rear porch, looking west. W W W Z 0 W J a z 0 FM J 2 W J Q Z NW LPL W J U U LO 0 M W W LO LO E L O LL L O C W C El Packet Pg. 76 comms Im all I AMP e N Y 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), close-up of three-part window on south elevation. i 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), south side of glazed enclosed porch, looking northwest. LU w W Z 0 i= Q w FEE a z 0 i= J 0 2 W J Q Z W W J U U U) 0 'Ww W.� DLO LO V E O UM L O W i L V W I� V L Q C M U a Packet Pg. 78 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), large window on south side of glazed enclosed porch, looking north. 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), close-up of south gable end of main roof. LU w W Z 0 Q w J a z 0 FM J 0 2 W J Q Z W W J U LO 0 M W W LO LO E L 0 LL 0 C W C V W L L rM f+ W M U a Packet Pg. 79 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), southwest rear corner, looking northeast. t, lye:. , 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), southwest rear corner, looking northeast. LU w W z 0 Q w J a z 0 FM J 0 2 W J Q z W W J U U LO 0 M W W LO LO v E 0 LL L 0 C W C V W L U Q C N M U a Packet Pg. 80 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins w 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), southwest rear corner, looking northeast. 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), rear/west elevation, looking north. W w W z 0 Q w J a z 0 FM J 0 2 LU J z LL LU LU J U U LO 0 M W W LO LO E L 0 LL L 0 C W C L V W f+ L U L Q f+ C W E M U a Packet Pg. 81 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), rear/west elevation, looking east-southeast. 305 Circle Drive (51-11.14126), junction of attached garage and rear/west elevation, looking north. El Packet Pg. 82 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), junction of garage wing and rear elevation, looking northeast. El Packet Pg. 83 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins J 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), entry on garage wing, looking northeast. LU w W z 0 i= Q w FEE g z 0 i= J 0 2 W J Q z W LU J U 0 M W W LO LO E L 0 UM L 0 C W C V W f+ L U L Q f+ C E M U a Packet Pg. 84 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins + i s r `f - � I 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), rear/west elevation, looking south. 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), rear/west elevation, looking southeast. Packet Pg. 85 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), rear/west elevation, looking southeast. 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), rear/west elevation, looking east. El Packet Pg. 86 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), west wall of house near junction with garage wing. 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), close-up of window near north end of rear/west elevation. Packet Pg. 87 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive. Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), sliding door on rear porch, looking southeast. 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), rear porch, looking northeast. w w z 0 Q w J a z 0 i= J 0 2 w J Q z w w J U U LO 0 M W w LO LO E L O LL L O C W C El Packet Pg. 88 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), rear porch with sliding glass door. 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), rear/west elevation, looking north-northeast. Packet Pg. 89 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins L 0 LL L 0 C C L V f+ L U L Q f+ C E L U a 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), covered rear porch, looking south. Packet Pg. 90 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (51-11.14126), ceiling of roof over rear porch. El Packet Pg. 91 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins Y r. 305 Circle Drive (51-11.14126), window on west/rear elevation. 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), window and door on west/rear elevation looking southeast. w w W z 0 Q w J a z 0 i= J 0 2 W Q z W W J U LO 0 M W W LO LO E L O LL L O C W C El Packet Pg. 92 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins i i 305 Circle Drive (51-11.14126), rear entry, looking east. w w w z 0 Q w H J a z 0 i= J 0 2 w J z w w J U U LO 0 M W w LO LO E L 0 LL 0 C W C L V W L U L Q f+ C w E M U �a a Packet Pg. 93 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins / 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), west side of glazed enclosed rear porch, looking southeast. ell 1 i J le X 6 A IF t 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), glazed rear porch, looking east. W W W Z 0 a W J a z 0 i= J W J Z_ 1 W 0 W J U U LO 0 M 00 W LO LO E L 0 LL 0 W r. L 7 U U L a c d E L U M Q Packet Pg. 94 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins a 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), large windows on west side of glazed rear porch. 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), close-up of brick chimney. Packet Pg. 95 Y r+ IN WWI lot r� I 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), close-up of window on south side of attached garage. 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), front/west end of garage, looking east. L O UM L O 4+ C C L V W f+ L U L Q f+ C E L U El Packet Pg. 98 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), front/west end of garage, looking east. 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), front/west end of garage, looking southeast. W W z 0 Q w J z 0 FM 2 W Q 1z 1.� W W J U U LO 0 M W W LO LO E L O LL L O C W C L V W f+ L U L Q f+ C W E M U a Packet Pg. 99 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), attached garage and unpaved alley behind house, looking southeast. s I r - � a �.._ r2, — u � 305 Circle Drive (51-11.14126), front yard, looking northeast. w w w z 0 Q w J a z 0 i= J 0 2 w J Q z w w J U U LO 0 M W w LO LO E O LL L O C d C L V W L L Q C N U a Packet Pg. 100 E;r Q ddam�,, y + .. � F k • I4 y' �.fM'iJ.�� t, No Text 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 51-R.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), looking front yard, looking southwest. 305 Circle Drive (51-R.14126), front yard, looking southwest. LU w W z 0 Q w J a z 0 i= J 0 2 LU J Q z LU LU J U U LO M Go W ui ui E L 0 LL 0 AC W i C V W L L Q C W L U a Packet Pg. 103 , ai>"�.'/' � 91'+- of .•!-a �, yti. �ia# I I, ,3 �y k 4l1^Jfvy'iF .N Y:IF IlI79W- ✓^+�i.; tJt�,, f All X J v p r Irr > " l4 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins OEM �. i�Y g q IIYYYY ��.. S ,�` '�. ,�f,,rS'• , +s�e. �T,_'ev '+?eJA 1 i' S .��":Lf�i'-_•i�"1 `�'�\'`►-.7�+4. � ..e Ei��F'd~�i ��r t n�i�i ��y.i ���.✓� .s R';� Y+,s-+� _n'�i" . % F,s..,. ,��.,� _`ro• ` 2t`-r t wi: 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), front yard, looking north. 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), foot path as seen from front porch, looking east. W W Z 0 Q W J g Z O FM O 2 W 0 J Z LL. W W J U U LO 0 M W w LO LO E L O LL L O C W C L V W f+ L U L Q f+ C w E M U M ++ a Packet Pg. 105 'I... I L LL Aldree �\ r 4 - 11"4 III )dMF IMP, v � 2.d Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.14126 — 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), back yard, looking south. 305 Circle Drive (5LR.14126), paver -paved patio with hot tub, looking south-southeast. L 0 UM L 0 C C L V W f+ L U L Q f+ C E L U El Packet Pg. 108 'llll ��LII�: - f�... � Yam) F '�! ♦ y... 3n �lv.T "ip 'Y ^i � .�•• -.- No Text o _ Pe PLinncls�. D(nirtopmen! E Tr�17sjr�tL3tl8f1 Shfrrcros t�''- CuIIiniLgaly `5krph4Mil HahlhbnrhvDd Serra 1- _ y4 Collins Q. 3Et+Jenh Odlav gas Si bi ie P.00 9110 >r+9 FA16 41 M 27*9 Requeat for Historic Review of Larliftark E ig1flity apd.ar Effect of Proposed aemoEitiai>, or AlIrratiorl Property Adtlrssc € Cw (.0 44Frr ap+rc'r(jo*7O6!hi)yte)underreview: �JbrnE 7 1ppllaotilt � ''i—`L�LA*AA Ah4111j:— TS5t3,ga,t Ccbslh d deacipHorl irf prgp4ed f i w Lms Jl� 0 J'Li%J 4I Plr>L r 1.a51r, CERTIFICATIGN I ccrtlfy kho iyiprnheppndfH exl:lnrbaubrrxltrd me hsrrmtloonr�ioirgt�pf rryylyygwptlpia 8lltlhelln Rnp Ci6 epplestlan Irrmxtngcitythrkoe%daaga tbM4nk kW1wlhmbr of"pwmrF4t Iheroil yrop9rly. Ga Ihci tdrni2 ore dulirmd rn Serbon 1.2of he CSIyCode fnriudggcomrnmwomlog* coe ntbwdbow m-^hredwllhthe pmpertewtridrrctie sl.tfeatorfii� eppka5orsi Purm&rit to s;id allhan?y- I hvity permlt city mciais ia enhw uPGrr iI-* Rrw" for ir4 purpm or eamigr ,rrWcsan pharognphar wan if raaraeefp. rpf pe y of Pubiz 1ho Property. 'Omlorfr5ppiao.•d oir�rc (rupdred}: '�- YM F- +` - DMr- Landmaris $iWificarw&Gnterra- A: P4laape1ty lh;4 i3 aayvtimlad velh •yenta Rost have made a aigraftaol e4rA KMoii to Iho broad pawrM5 aI Mr local ala1r. ar nmoanral N&tary. 13: A.pr4p"%hog irk*SidCielffdw'jh the Win sd pumorse njirV4mnt+n ors pear; C: A IN upudy ihat emba&es the dr9lindive ehsucterl9tres of a tlpfr podod, ar mHhmd of nm"pw 9t to wprk of a mamArcr: ppa5easei5 high argsllcvalue; arrapreaenS ISLGr.IRranl end diC&gpiOurbIn unhty whwm Forrrpan6nM rimy NO; 1ni$Y1 r4lr Mlyrc11[m, D: Ar pigpmly" hn relded,ar ma}' he likely to yield, InNre-rellon Imoartantln p LLINOmy m Msb&p A aWls aF Integilty Crilotra: i.+}CIrErmtD VKjAil E whets thr NflfAC properly vraa coneirmled or kite place rblefe dye hirrluic event O=ered. 8eatpn fs 1le eamhlnaupn of elemerktB thef4 CreMlt %P a f0 m, plan Svpce. StruCie, end slyie a a mpeny. satMy Is the y:l'fsicrrl awiru4imed of a Iigtpnrr l+mparR' Twhereas Io[a4an mlers r-0 the epeuno place whrere u pKvcrty wm hA fr an ewerd 0000ned. eethng raters to the tharadw of the plate- li kwolems hors- not jasl AWE. the pmptAy ie sihiaded and ins: relanomti 1p to 1ha RurrpLlA41ng IgaillrPB and open epac*- Melerimks am he physocal elemenis lhaf forte e, NWwir prop" WoOm m W Ie the OlhyCkal evidonm of the orw% of 2 pwrirulm cxWuf-at rY pgnpW dung gw grrgrl pgiied in hlsiory or preNslwy. 11 1a Line eulaer3ce of ara9sag' labor end sk.111 m apnsifuC*rry qr o4e4 ley P 4 4Mlna, j4ft=rq. 4l yt4r• Fer6ny is a pmperry�s expression of the aeerherLo pr hwar14 rr4ni9 or R paruwFu period er Ultra. 1t ce*l,dts from 1M plaeene! al pk" Mffluree Ihek hk micgeihar, eanweythe prapartya malaria ehu.5mv. A,ssodaMm Is the dlred ha between en ImpMan1 hlsiortc event or person ano a hissorx properly'. A properly rateirn easodm on irk isthe place wee the eventor ertrwhy Dr.mrred am Ianufi derAy IrMgM to 4 rnmayihat fvIelllgmhp %en ahaanrar. Like feehig. asmciadon re"ras the praeenee of phyamvi faslu ma that tam" a prwerty'8 hlalolie character. U LLI LI O_ F Q s v LLI J O_ f— J O rt LLl M J LL LU LLl J U U 0 N] 46 U2 E O LL .T 7 as L� �1 Packet PU. 112 2.e (For Office Use Only) Date Material& Received. Yea No Information ❑ ❑ Property is So years or older? ScurcwDate of C0n$1rvClran ❑ ❑ Property is on Me Stale or Nationa Register or is within a State or National F+istoric District? Sile Number: D strict: K-"tJuf4=91 r 9Q El El K Corr.menis: hen org r. ar ntegr-L is being affected' (Jf es, I'm, is 41teratr n; ifno. minor) ea Qan orkmans Materi "Setti Location e�2r or.ia ' eel in Prop" has sigrifcarice and is eligihla Far individual Landmark designa;,an? Comments: Property retains a preparlder$nc;U pf 41rrwhileCturel integrity"? Proposed plans would uphold the property's signficanre, integrity and eligibility? CDNS Director's Signalure: Yes No LPC Chalr Date: n of i el cted? i4 �s m Y larali d ,a miner] urkmansh' Material settin acalio ssaei a ling ❑ Praper!y has significance and is eligible for individual Landmark designation? Comments: Fxrrb-1 xr a +Chf C- i NE" A"L C= �1 ❑ Property retains a preponderance of architectural integrity? C omrncnts. ❑ Proposed plans would uphold the propery's signiricance, integrity and eli3ib lity? CamMEMta: J AV LPC Choir's Signature: Date. I I w 7 w J L.} W L) 427 O ao W }ti Packet Pon 113 2.f City of FortCottins _f� • Construction Date: 1953 • Community Development and Neighborhood Services (CDNS) Director and Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) Chair Review: • Proposed work is major • Property is individually eligible as a Fort Collins Landmark under Standard C: Design/Construction - unique example of Ranch -style, post -WWII architecture Packet Pg. 114 Location and Context 2.f City of Fort`Collins �� 1 North Elevation of Fort Collins South Elevation South Elevation West Elevation (rear) Packet Pg. 116 2.f Fort of rrtrs West Elevation (rear) City of FortCollins _f� • Demolition • New Residence West Elevation (rear) W_ W W z O H Q W FM J Q z O H J O M W 0 J a z LL W 0 W J U U) O M 00 (O LO U) rM Cn U. a �a rM W E M a Packet Pg. 117 2.f w w w J a z LL rm O C d d U. a �a W E M El Packet Pg. 118 2.g Phone Log May 12, 2017 1. Tyler Stampfli — 450 Circle Drive - Opposed N d E E O U u a Packet Pg. 119 2.g From: Cassandra Bumaarner To: "Robanette" Subject: RE: 305 Circle Dr. Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:39:50 PM Hello Robanette, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. Thank you! Cassandra Bumgarner ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: Robanette [mailto:robanetter@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 10:51 AM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: 305 Circle Dr. Hi, I am writing in regard to the proposed demo/rebuild of the house on 305 Circle Dr. I have lived in this neighborhood since 1958, and have watched with dismay as old homes are being razed and rebuilt in styles that are not in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. I am not opposed to remodels and additions. We added on to our existing house, that was built in 1958, however, we did so by lacing in the brick for the addition to make the outside appear the same as the existing part of the home. I can't see how a completely new style of architecture and materials is in keeping with the feel of the neighborhood. Furthermore, the home in question, 305 Circle Dr. has been well taken care of and already is a larger size than it's counterparts. It seems that lot size is the most important indicator currently in this spate of homes being razed and rebuilt. Anything of 10,000 + lot size looks to have a greater value for the lot than the home due to their proximity to old town. I had no problem with the home being razed and rebuilt at 612 Pitkin as the previous home had been remodeled numerous times so that it, prior the rebuild, was a house out of character for the neighborhood. What is disconcerting is the way these new homes are being rebuilt so grossly out of character. Yes, it is a travesty to take a well built home, all brick, with many modern upgrades already, and just disregard the old home to make way for the new modem/industrial style. I would not be opposed to a new structure being built, although it does seem a waste of a perfectly good home, if the new design was to try and blend in aesthetically with the surrounding homes. Perhaps before it's too late, some sort of change can be made to current codes to limit the discord in appearances of new homes being built in old/older neighborhoods. Robanette Catalano 1309 Stover St. 970-221-3625 d E E 0 U a Packet Pg. 120 2.g From: Cassandra Bumgarner To: "Nora Hill" Subject: RE: 305 Circle or Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:33:10 PM Hello Eleanor, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. Thank you! Cassandra Bumgarner ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: Nora Hill [mailto:norabella@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 5:10 PM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: 305 Circle Dr Cassandra, I live on the west side, but I am concerned with the plans for 305 Circle Drive. I have friends on Circle Dr, and I know many of the houses are quite small and cramped by modern standards, but this replacement house seems a bit much. I am a proponent of forward thinking in architecture. I have a rather modern addition on my own In Victorian house, and there are several new, modern houses in the old town area that I think are well done. goo block of West Mountain comes to mind (the big, dark gray house). The small house that rm was there was nothing special, on a street with big houses. The new house is pretty cool, I think. a) E E I'm not so sure about this one. It looks very modern, which in my opinion would not fit in well on V Circle Drive. The front elevation is quite stark. They do seem to have kept the scale of the house in U keeping with neighbors, but it's hard to tell. The total size is over 5000 sq ft, which on Circle would put it in the "huge" category. And over 3000 sq ft above grade? That's big. a As I said, I am on the west side, so pretty far from Circle Dr. I'm not sure this is any of my business for that reason. But Circle is a special area in Fort Collins, and the reason for that is the architecture and quaint appeal of the modest houses. Thank you, Eleanor Hill 1020 W Oak St 407-1245 Packet Pg. 121 2.g From: Cassandra Bumaarner To: "Rosemary Steinbeck" Subject: RE: 305 Circle Drive demo and rebuild Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:37:14 PM Hello Rosemary, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. Thank you! Cassandra Bumgarner ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: Rosemary Steinbeck [mailto:rosemary.steinbeck@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 7:32 AM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: 305 Circle Drive demo and rebuild Dear Ms. Bumgarner, I just saw the intended construction for the home to be demolished at 305 Circle Drive. While I try to be respectful of people's property rights, I have to say I am appalled at how drastically different this home is in relation to the neighborhood and for that matter, the adjoining neighborhoods. I don't deny someone's right to improve his property, but I also don't understand why anyone would buy property in an area of tightly spaced homes of a definite style and period, and then want to change the tone of the neighborhood altogether by building something so completely not in keeping with that tone. I would please, please ask that this be taken under historical review and not permitted in it's current proposed N state! I will not be able to attend the meeting on May 17th, but hope that my voice will be heard nonetheless. E 0 Thank you! U Rosemary Steinbeck owner, 5 Circle Drive Virus -free. www.avg.com rail Packet Pg. 122 2.g From: Cassandra Bumoarner To: "Kate Forgach" Subject: RE: 305 Circle Drive destruction Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 3:20:53 PM Hello Kate, W Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the W comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings w begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: Z http://ciiydocs.fcgov.com/? O cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- ~ 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. 9 Thank you! Cassandra Bumgarner CASSANDRA BUMGARNER J Historic Preservation Planner 0 970-416-4250 W City of Fort Collins J Q Z_ -----Original Message----- W From: Kate Forgach [mailto:kateforgach(a gmail.com] LU Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 1:32 PM > To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: 305 Circle Drive destruction W J I am thoroughly opposed to ruining the neighborhood atmosphere with the appallingly inappropriate new building proposed by the U owners, a la the hideous house built at the corner of Washington St and Mountain Ave. This only opens the door for more such U unwelcome housing. LO O M This is one of the few remaining "affordable" neighborhoods in Fort Collins that also has a true neighborhood feel to it. O co Thank you. u Kate Forgach Writer at Large 970-217-7444 E O U c� (L ro El Packet Pg. 123 2.g From: Cassandra Bumaarner To: "Sharon Overacker" Subject: RE: 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins demolition Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:48:09 PM Hello Sharon and Ed. Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION &docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. Thank you! Cassandra Bumgarner ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: Sharon Overacker [mailto:sharonoveracker@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 11:16 AM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins demolition Hello Cassandra, I'm writing to express my dismay at the proposed demolition/new house for 305 Circle Drive, Fort Collins. My husband and I have owned 385 Circle Drive since 1996. We love the neighborhood, and the historical feel of the area. We've seen many changes through the years. Most of what we've seen have been improvements. Indeed, we remodeled the interior of our very small (800 square feet) home in 2008 because we anticipate owning this home for a long time. However, the proposed 305 Circle Dr home is NOT an improvement, in our opinion, and we think of it at as a blight. Far from being a run-down home, 305 Circle Drive was lovingly cared for, and is very attractive. As one of the bigger homes 'n to on Circle, it stood out in a pleasant way. Words fail us when we look at the proposed home. "Industrial, warehouse, tractor shed, ugly, out -of -character, out -of historical context' , come to mind, and nothing positive. We are going to have to look at Y this home in the future, and anyone new to the neighborhood will spot that house as an anomaly. We initially heard there m was going to be a ranch style replacement of the exisiting 305, and we envisioned a traditional style ranch. This is so far from E it, that we hardly even consider it a ranch home. C U It is our understanding that the home quickly sold for 525K, so after demolition of the exisiting home, the buyers essentially v paid 525K for a developed lot. What could these people who literally paid 525K for a lot, do when they realize that neighbors aren't thrilled? They could sell it for the same price they paid for it, and buy to demolish & build in a different neighborhood-- a one that is appropriate to their design. Or they could modify/add-on/ expand existing etc. -- More in line with the character, L style, and appeal of the existing homes. p Seeing as they probably won't change their plans unless the city tells them to do so, I'm realizing that my small (800 sq foot) house is worth far more for the lot than the house. How long before the other small homes on the street are sold, not for the house, but the lot? It does make me kind of sad --in the old "there goes the neighborhood" way... Please reconsider approval of demolishing this very charming existing home. There's a lot of talk about home affordability in Fort Collins. This neighborhood was for many years, an area of smaller, starter homes. Most of the homes on Circle drive are very small. This is either ridiculous, a sign of the times, or both. Thank you Sharon & Ed Overacker Packet Pg. 124 2.g From: Cassandra Bumgarner To: "Baran,Jennie" Subject: RE: 305 Circle Drive Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:27:56 PM Hello Jennie, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. Thankyou! Cassandra Bumgarner ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: Baran,Jennie[mailto:Jennie.Baran@colostate.edu] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 3:41 PM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: 305 Circle Drive Hi Cassandra, I am a neighbor close to the 305 Circle Drive address that is being considered for a tear down and rebuild with a LO modern structure. I have significant concerns about this type of activity for many reasons. M 1. These new structures, while beautiful on their own, do not fit with those that surround them. This makes the ao neighborhood feel awkward and unplannedLO 2. This structure appears to be much larger than what is currently at this address and will likely increase property m taxes for all the neighbors 3. 1 live next to a small house, similar to my own, which was recently sold. It makes me very nervous to see this a) type of activity taking place within our city and potentially next to me. E Please reconsider allowing this rebuild as it sends the message that Old Town Fort Collins neighborhoods are open C U game for redevelopment. U Jennie Baran a 409 Buckeye Street Fort Collins m Packet Pg. 125 2.g From: Cassandra Bumaarner To: "L E C Subject: RE: 305 Circle Drive Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:35:51 PM Hello Leanne, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. Thank you! Cassandra Bumgarner ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: L E C[mailto:leannecline@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 8:19 PM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: 305 Circle Drive As a homeowner on Circle Drive (210), I am writing to express my sadness and concern regarding the demolition of the current home and the building of an ultra modern property in its place. Please reconsider the approval of the petition. It is wasteful to demolish a perfectly solid home and the new plans are certainly out of charachter for this historic neighborhood. Thank you Leanne Cline 210 Circle Drive La vida es buena, ya veras. d E E 0 U c.� a Packet Pg. 126 2.g From: Cassandra Bumaarner To: 11wirvinomills20amail.com" Subject: RE: 305 Circle Drive Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:34:54 PM Hello Wendy, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. Thank you! Cassandra Bumgarner CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: wirvingmills2@gmail.com[mailto:wirvingmills2@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 5:37 PM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: 305 Circle Drive Good afternoon, I am writing as a concerned neighbor about the potential demolition of the existing residence at 305 Circle Drive. What is proposed to take its place does not fit into the character of the neighborhood at all. It appears the owners want more space and are doing this by constructing a basement. If the existing house is slab on grade construction, yes, demolition is the only way to do that. What if there is another way? As one walks by the current residence, it is quite noticeably the largest original house in the subdivision. As someone with many years of architectural experience, it would seem totally within the realm of reality that more space can be built by going up, with a much more historically sensitive placement of dormers, and perhaps a steeper pitch roof to E allow more headroom. That approach would keep the integrity of the original house, make it more accommodating of E today's space needs, and still fit within the fabric of the neighborhood. The lot itself looks large enough to V accommodate quite a large addition onto the back of the residence, as another way to gain the needed space. An addition could very easily be designed to be compatible with the existing structure. Also, one of the best ways to make a project "sustainable" is to keep most of the original structure! Think of all the embodied energy that went into the production of the components of the original house. Why throw that all away, and use more energy and resources to construct something new? The Eastside Neighborhood is comprised of many different historical areas. Circle Drive already has a few newer structures that don't fit into the Circle Drive aesthetic. There are ways that new structures can fit into an historic neighborhood. Unfortunately, these new structures, and the one proposed for 305 Circle Drive do not adopt any of those techniques. It is my sincere hope that someone takes a good look at reusing/remodeling/adding onto the existing structure and thereby save that little bit of fabric that is Circle Drive. Thank you, Wendy Irving -Mills 322 Edwards St. Fort Collins, CO rail Packet Pg. 127 2.g From: Cassandra Bumaarner To: "Leslie Hill' Subject: RE: 305 Circle Drive Date: Monday, May 15, 2017 10:23:20 AM Hi Leslie, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. Section 14-72 of the Municipal Code addresses the requirements for the Plan of Protection as far as Historic Preservation's requirements; however, your questions relating to the additional process that is overseen by the Building Code Services Division. For Historic Preservation, this section of the Plan of Protection is meant to understand their plan for salvaging historic materials, such as historic glass. If you have further questions on deconstruction, salvaging, and recycling as it applies to all building projects, please contact Katy Hand at khand(cDfcgov.com or 970-416-4272. Thank you! Cassandra ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: Leslie Hill [mailto:lhiII12@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 11:30 AM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: 305 Circle Drive Hi Cassandra, ui Ys: I'm a resident of Circle Drive and have a couple of comments regarding the planned building at 305 Circle = Drive. E E I read the documents included in the Agenda for the Landmark Preservation Commission meeting for V 5/17/2017. In the Plan of Protection for Historic Properties under 4.0 Deconstruction, Salvalging & Recycling Materials in item 4.1 Which historic materials will be deconstructed and salvaged? it states that "Deconstruction cost proposals were obtained but were not financially feasable for the a homeowners." For me, it is a little hard to believe that someone who purchased the home for $525,000 and plans to scrape the entire home and build a new one cannot afford to deconstruct the current building. Is there any requirement for deconstruction? I also noted that in item 4.2 Which historic materials will not be salvaged, and how will they be disposed of? it states only "Composite roof shingle, exterior brick, sheetrock, interior trim and cabinetry." and does not answer the question of how the items will be disposed of. Would it be possible to get an answer to that question? Thanks so much, Leslie Hill Packet Pg. 128 2.g From: Cassandra Bumaarner To: "iennifer Lewis" Subject: RE: 305 Circle Drive Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:30:22 PM Hello Jennifer, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. Thank you! Cassandra Bumgarner ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: jennifer Lewis [mailto:jennclewis@hotmaiLcom] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 3:48 PM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: 305 Circle Drive Hello Ms. Bumgarner, I live right near the Circle Drive neighborhood (527 Edwards St.), and I have NO problems with the proposed plans for 305 Circle Drive. I understand folks are upset that the new home won't look historical. I have had a few homes re -built on my street and though I don't love the style of them, I do love the increased property value they have added to my own modest home. This is a vote for letting the owners at 305 Circle do what they want :) Thank you. Let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jennifer Lewis 970.227.6359 d E E 0 U c.� a Packet Pg. 129 2.g Fmm: Ca==andra nmmuamrr To: 'AMrew MllMuci" Subjecu RE: 305 Orde Drry Date: Monday, May 15, 2D17 12:47:39 PM alptl,nwnts: anaae001on Hello Andrew, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to seethe full packet, the agenda is posted here: lithe //citvdocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&doc d=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY-17-201. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. For all boards and commissions, there is a standard recusal process that allows members to disclose their conflict of interest to the Clerk of the City of Fort Collins. This requires disclosure regarding any financial or personal interest according to Article IV. Section 9 of the Fort Collins Charter. Thankyoul Cassandra ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 979-416-4250 CiN of Fort Collins From: Andrew Milbauer[mailto:andrewmilbauer@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 3:04 PM To: Cassandra Bumgamer Subject: 305 Circle Drive I write this letter in support of the demolition/new construction for 305 Circle Drive. I also want you to be aware that you will receive a lot of letters against this project from people within POOTH, they have posted this on various websites and asked everyone to email you with opposition to the home as a result of building materials and architecture. They also posted it to Nextdoor.com the letter I screen shot at the end of this email Please notice that many of the same people who spoke against this project sent emails and spoke against our project at 815 W. Oak Street last January. They area vocal minority. Here is why I support the house based on LPC policies. The original house did not meet criteria for historic status. It did not show master craftsmanship, nothing historic happened their, nor was it unique architecture. The new house is complimentary to the neighborhood which has a large number of midcentury modern homes. A ranch style home is not architecturally significant, it is a box. The current home at 305 Circle drive is a modest ranch with nothing stunning about it. I was dismayed to see the historic inventory of the house found it to be individually eligible. There is no such thing as squared bay windows, those are picture windows placed on a bumped out wall. A bay window allows a view through the sides. This is not significant. The unique low slung porch on the back is the result of a lackluster renovation at some point, It is quite ugly, Judging by the posts it is not original. I also find it interesting that one of the past residents was named "Dunn." If that person is related to Meg Dunn I expect her to recuse herself from the hearing. This home design uses articulation to reduce massing, it is tastefully set back from the road. It will compliment the mid century style of those homes and enhance the character of the community. As for materials, these are commonly used in midcentury style. This home is gorgeous. A monotonous landscape of similar styles does not elevate a community. Adding homes that diversify and enhance will benefit everyone. The home is gorgeous. Two doors to the north of it is a another midcentury modern home. It can be seen in several pictures on your site. This new home will enhance the neighborhood, I support it. More importantly the groups opposed to this are delaying a home senselessly. The delays the LPC caused us actually placed us in physical jeopardy. During our demolition we discovered the home was so improperly framed, and the foundation so rotten it was days from collapse. One more heavy snow would have collapsed our home, with us in it. We remained there for 6 additional months as a result of the LPC process. When the excavator hit the front corner of the house with very little force the entire building collapsed. Not all old homes were built to last. 02 Agenda - Wednesday. r ice° Q O Secure I https://oldtownwestneighborhood.mxtdoor.mm/news feed/71c=3031&toc section=replies&is=de&mobile_deeplink_data=action%3Dviewyost%26post%3D50589866&s= * I id Apps ® baldmanapes.com si:. „i, NWEA - Admin 6fl Science Tech Tools ®My Polls I Poll Every: ♦ Synergy! 0 naviance ® historic review (; dipdeck ® him ® maps interactive class ® googwapps ra General Lost 8 Found Update to 305 Circle Dr demolition/rebuild Pet Directory Sharon Overackerttem Easfside Ind &10 Recommendations at I posted yesterday to the east side neighborhood that the plans for this demo/rebuild were on the city planning webshe. and my shock at seeing what is proposed. I'm :1 YOUR GROUPSwere the neighborhood radius because this is going to be widespread. Old Town West Pet Identifier Browse all groups I also called the city planning and left a message. I was surprised to get a return phone call from Cassandra Bumgarer who is with the historical preservation dept. ® Nextdoar 2017 1 could tell she shared my frustration at what is planned. She said the historical review About B!og Guidelines Help JODS process doesn't allow them many options, and this Is likely to go through. UNLESS Privacy Press safety there is feedback —which is put into the packet for review on May 17. She asked me to send an emailand also ask for other citizen input. They are trying to get codes revised because this tear down/rebuild thing is going to be a big issue. It absolutely does affect us from a historical perspective, affordability and taxes (mine went up almost 25%). This proposed house isn't a traditional ranch, or even close. It has corrugated metal, and Could be called even 'Industriar besides 'modern' Not in character of the neighborhood from our point of view She's asking for entails on the subject, as this has been a sleeper Email her your thoughts at Cassandra u..'i r�Gi ttt urs The sooner the better, and by May 17 v W 1A J Q Z LL TF i rw= Packet Pg. 130 2.g From: Cassandra Bumgarner To: "Neth,Cara" Subject: RE: 305 Circle Drive Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:25:41 PM Hello Cara, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. Thank you! Cassandra Bumgarner ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: Neth,Cara[mailto:Cara.Neth@Co!oState.EDU] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 3:19 PM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: 305 Circle Drive Dear Ms. Bumgarner, I am writing to express my dismay at the proposed demolition of 305 Circle Drive (scheduled for hearing on May 17). This is one of the signature homes in the Circle Drive neighborhood and an exceptional example of a blonde -brick, post- war, mid-century ranch home — in the city's very first subdivision! We have had one other tear -down in the Circle Drive neighborhood, across the street from 305, but that was a much smaller and less well -maintained home. Without question, 305 is one of the finest and most distinctive homes in the entire neighborhood. By opening this door, you will be opening the door to the wholesale destruction of one of Fort Collins' most beloved neighborhoods — if 305 is dispensible, then potentially no home in the subdivision is distinctive enough to merit preservation. Despite what the architects allege in their proposal, the home being proposed for construction is dramatically out of character with the neighborhood, both in style and external materials proposed to be used. In contrast, I suggest they look at the renovation of 440 Circle Drive, which not only involved the complete renovation of the existing structure but also the addition of a second structure in the rear —without sacrificing any of the character of the original home. It is a wonderful improvement to the original home and the neighborhood as a whole. I am afraid the Russell home proposed will be entirely the opposite. Please, please, please consider postponing this application and considering a landmark designation for this property. I welcome the Russells as neighbors, but I would hope that they would respect the historic nature of the neighborhood in which they've purchased a home. Circle Drive is a unique and highly desirable neighborhood, and many people would be proud to live on Circle and lovingly preserve the historic feel and character of the neighborhood. Thank you, Cara Neth 335 Circle Drive w d E E 0 U U M a Packet Pg. 131 2.g From: Cassandra Bumaarner To: 'Sarah L Brooks" Subject: RE: Demolition on Circle Drive- No Please! Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 2:02:58 PM Hello Sarah, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. Thank you! Cassandra Bumgarner ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: Sarah L Brooks[mailto:sarahbrooks.co@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 8:27 PM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: Demolition on Circle Drive- No Please! The plan for this house is not in the character of our neighborhood. It does not belong on Circle Drive. Please do not approve it. We do not want million dollar homes in our neighborhood. Thank you, Sarah Brooks d E E 0 U c.� a Packet Pg. 132 2.g From: Cassandra Bumaarner To: "Waaner.Ann" Subject: RE: new build at 305 Circle Drive Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:26:52 PM Hello Ann, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. Thank you! Cassandra Bumgarner ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: Wagner,Ann[mailto:Ann.Wagner@ColoState.EDU] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 3:21 PM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: new build at 305 Circle Drive Through Nextdoor.com, I just became aware of the proposed plan for a new home to be built at 305 Circle Drive. In general, I'm not opposed to property owners developing their lots as they wish, but this home seems completely out of character for the neighborhood. Circle Drive has always been a little oasis of modest homes of similar style, and neighborhood pride is obvious. The plans for this new house indicate a very modern / industrial look, which is not very compatible with other homes in the area. I don't know if there is anything the city can do to prevent this from going forward, but I do think it would be a w shame to see this distinctive neighborhood lose its character. _ d E E Ann Turner V 604 Garfield Street, Fort Collins 80524 U aewagner(@colostate.edu a Packet Pg. 133 2.g From: Cassandra Bumgarner To: "K. Close" Subject: RE: In support of proposed demolition/construction - 305 Circle Drive Date: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 8:17:33 AM Hello Kelly, W Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the W comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings W begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: Z http://ciiydocs.fcgov.com/? O cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- ~ 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. 9 Thank you! Cassandra Bumgarner CASSANDRA BUMGARNER J Historic Preservation Planner 0 970-416-4250 W City of Fort Collins J Q -----Original Message----- Z From: K. Close [mailto:kclose&frii.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 10:40 PM W To: Cassandra Bumgarner > Subject: In support of proposed demolition/construction - 305 Circle Drive G W I am writing you to tell you that I am in full support of this project as presented. The existing house itself, in my opinion, does not J present any particularly unique architecture and I cannot understand why the Historical Inventory Report designated it as V Individually Eligible for local landmark status. The front porch was singled out as a unique architectural feature, though appears to U be simply an extension of the concrete pad for the house. This house is very similar to many others in the area, and I would consider LO it to be at most "Contributing." When my own house was under similar consideration, Mr. Marmor wrote in the initial version of his 0 historical inventory report that it had a "unique architectural feature -the 'short -stack' chimney." This was in fact a full chimney that as 00 was falling down and missing a number of the upper tiers of bricks. (D LO U) The proposed house looks well -designed, and is within context of other mid-century modern houses in that area. And in 50 years, it N would certainly be eligible as Individually Eligible due to some of the interesting architectural and design features it will have. _ d Please consider approving this project. As a long-time resident and homeowner in Old Town, I believe it would be an asset to the E area. 0 U Thank you. v Respectfully, (L L Kelly Close d 815 W. Oak v Ft. Collins, CO L V LO 0 c") r.+ C N L C� a Packet Pg. 134 2.g From: Cassandra Bumaarner To: "HeatherLandenaera" Subject: RE: 305 Circle Dr. Date: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 8:15:51 AM Hello Heather, That is correct —the Landmark Preservation Commission has three options for a final demolition/alteration review hearing on an undesignated property: 1) approve the application, 2) approve with conditions (such as comprehensive photographic or historic documentation of the property or other mitigating solutions), or 3) postpone the decision for up to 45 days to allow time for the Commission and/or interested citizens to seek additional information about the existing residence, which may include an exploration of the benefits to the City of a nonconsensual landmark designation. To do a nonconsensual designation, either six or more members of the LPC or three or more members of the public would have to initiate the designation application. City Council is the decision maker for all designations, including nonconsensual designations, but the LPC does provide a recommendation. Public comment is important to record how the community values the historic resource and responds to the proposed work in the official record. Best, Cassandra ............... CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: Heather Landenpera [mailto:hlanden@aol.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 2:44 PM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: Re: 305 Circle Dr. Dear Cassandra, Thank you very much for this feedback. After reading the code you forwarded, it seems that unless the property is made a historical landmark the project will be approved. Is this correct? How then do the opinions of the public play into the LPC hearing? Thank you, Heather Landenpera, LAc, MPT, LLC 970=237=2224 -----Original Message ----- From: Cassandra Bumgarner <cbumgarnerCcDfcaov.com> To: 'Heather Landenpera' <hlanden(a)aol.com> Sent: Mon, May 15, 2017 12:24 pm Subject: RE: 305 Circle Dr. Hello Heather, Thank you for reaching out and providing public comment on the 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review. All the comments we receive will be provided to the Landmark Preservation Commission for their hearing on May 17, 2017. Meetings begin at 5:30 pm at City Hall at 300 Laporte Avenue. If you wish to see the full packet, the agenda is posted here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/? cmd=convert&vid=46&dt=AGENDA&docid=2938033&board=LANDMARK+PRESERVATION+COMMISSION&docdate=MAY- 17-2017. There will be opportunity for public comment at the meeting as well. N m E E 0 U U a Packet Pg. 135 2.g For final demolition/alteration requests, the LPC must apply the code found in Article 4, Section 14-72(f) of the Municipal Code. Section 3.4.7 of the Land Use Code is meant for application on development projects rather than single family, residential properties. Thank you! Cassandra CASSANDRA BUMGARNER Historic Preservation Planner 970-416-4250 City of Fort Collins From: Heather Landenpera [mailto:hlanden(daol.com] Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2017 1:39 PM To: Cassandra Bumgarner Subject: 305 Circle Dr. Dear Cassandra and all Landmark Preservation Commissioners: I am the owner of the home most significantly impacted by the proposal at 305 Circle Drive, as I live DIRECTLY across the street and will look at the resultant design every single day. Naturally, I have a few thoughts I would like to contribute relative to the proposal. We must keep in mind that vibrant and loved residential neighborhoods with home -owner occupants are not museums or mausoleums, but must ever continue to evolve and become enriched. I am aware that you are obliged to comment on the design only with with respect to its compliance with Section 3.4.7 of the Fort Collins Land Use Code and not as a design review commission as no such body is seated in the city of Fort Collins. In that regard and with respect to 3.4.7 only, I find the proposed massing to be compatible with the character of the neighborhood. The overall form is simple and cleverly executed. The scale is similar to the other houses on the block face. The setbacks are compatible with the surrounding homes and the house has a front porch that is common in the neighborhood typology. The massing is respectful in scale to the neighboring house to the north as little to no sun shading will occur even during the winter months. Window shapes and level of detail are in line with the neighboring houses and the 2 in 12 roof slope is similar or equal to the low sloped roofs of several mid-century homes in the Circle Drive area. Eave dimensions LO match the neighboring homes of a similar type. N Although I am comfortable with the metal siding as a dominant material, I know that it is quite possible the m LPC will find this material incompatible with the neighborhood. Thus, it seems that a standard module (or E otherwise) brick or cast brick (potentially in a 1.5 inch by 24 inch module which is common in the mid- C century type) could be used to some extent in the solution in order to improve the compatibility with the V overall neighborhood where brick is far and away the dominant material. It could simply be used in one of U the minor masses, on a low wall, etc. in the region of the street facing facade. I look forward to welcoming my new neighbors and having a view of their new home from my front windows. a Sincerely, Heather Landenpera 280 Circle Dr. Packet Pg. 136 2.g From: Neth,Cara To: Cassandra Bumoarner Subject: 305 Circle Drive Date: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 9:59:45 AM Attachments: Our Colorado heritage at risk aaain.docx Hi Cassandra, I'm forwarding the attached letter on behalf of Torger Hougen, 335 Circle Drive, for consideration in regard to the hearing on 305 Circle Drive. G N d E E O U c.� a Packet Pg. 137 2.g RE: Cirlcle Drive demolition @ 305 Our Colorado heritage at risk again, this time locally. City of Ft. Collins - I have lived in Colorado for 55 years and in Ft. Collins for 43 of those. We are proud of our classic "first suburb of Ft. Collins" neighborhood on Circle Drive. Over the years we have all pitched in to improve and maintain this historic street. I myself have worked to quiet the many dogs so that walkers, runners and mothers with baby carriages would feel welcome strolling beautiful Circle Drive. Now someone wants to start scraping off our history and pride, needlessly and wastefully tearing down a classic home at 305 Circle Drive. The original blond brick slated for trashing is irreplaceable (the new kind of blond brick is either orange or whitish, the classic golden clay has been mined out for the most part.) We would be happy if they gut the structure and re -do it inside. But the proposed exterior, tacky siding that will be out of fashion in 2 years will be an instant eyesore and does not respect the integrity of our neighborhood. There are many houses in the area that are not that nice and could easily be "scraped off" and no one would mind. But not one of the nicest houses on the street! Not the house made out of historic material that is unique to Colorado. Why would they do that? (They won't make a lot of friends, it will ultimately bring the property down, as well as that of the surrounding homes.) Really? Cruddy corrugated metal siding? So THEY will be able to look out at our lovely street of homes but WE will have to look at their ugly tack. Nice. What did we ever do to them? Please don't allow the destruction of our history and beauty just so some wealthy yahoos can "build their dream home" at the expense of our neighborhood and our city. Please help us preserve what makes our Circle Dr. attractive and desirable to all who see it. Thank you, Torger Hougen N m >_ >_ 0 U U a Packet Pg. 138 Item 2, Exhibit 1 305 Circle Dr. - Citizen Letter Received after Hearing From: Karen McWilliams To: Gretchen Schiacer Subject: FW: Support for 305 Circle Drive project Date: Thursday, May 18, 2017 8:26:50 AM Here is one I didn't see before the meeting. - Karen Karen McWilliams Historic Preservation Manager City of Fort Collins 970.224.6078 kmcwilliams@fcgov.com From: Kevin Krause [mailto:kevkrause@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 4:02 PM To: Karen McWilliams Subject: Support for 305 Circle Drive project Hi Karen - Hope you are well! We will not be able to attend the LPC meeting tonight but want to express our support for the 305 Circle Drive project as submitted. As nearby property owners (813 E. Elizabeth), we believe the design respects both the immediate and greater neighborhood, including in terms of scale and how it presents to the street. The architecture is thoughtful and unique, adding to the character of the area just as the significantly renovated homes on the SE and NE sides of Circle Drive have. Thank you, Kevin & Adrian Krause r4U Packet Pg. 137-1 City of ff�,F�ort Collins Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Manager Landmark Preservation Commission 05.17.2017 .:A •,I •. ki ry , , w 305 Circle Drive Final Demolition/Alteration Review Location and Context 2 Background and History 3 305 Circle Drive r rr tittie -r L- ♦. i .. '1. �. Asia Item 2, Exhibit 2 305 Circle Dr. Staff Presentation REVISED Submitted at Hearing City of Fort`Collins �� North Elevation City of �FortCollins ` f� South Elevation South Elevation West Elevation (rear) H J a 0 2 w 0 0 w J U w U LO 0 M 0 W U) W a to Q L IL M U) N t X W Packet Pg. 137-3 Item 2, Exhibit 2 305 Circle Dr. Staff Presentation REVISED Submitted at Hearing City of FortCollins f� West Elevation (rear) City of Fort Collins f� Demolition New Residence 142 West Elevation (rear) H J Q O 2 W W J CU W CU LO 0 M W W C C OM Cn N Z t K W Packet Pg. 137-4 Item 2, Exhibit 2 305 Circle Dr. Staff Presentation REVISED Submitted at Hearing City of FortCollins f� Approve the application, finding that the applicant has met each of the steps and submittals required by the code; • Fees, posting and notice requirements have been met; • Documentation of the existing structure • Plan of Protection • Fully approved plans - plans comply with relevant city codes City of Fort Collins f� • Approve with conditions; conditions may include, but not limited to: • comprehensive photographic documentation; • comprehensive historical, developmental, social and/or architectural documentation of the property and neighborhood and/or • any other mitigating solution agreed upon by the Commission, the applicant, and any other applicable parties J Q 0 2 w 0 0 w J CU W CU LO 0 M 0 W Cn W C C L Q_ M N Z w Packet Pg. 137-5 Item 2, Exhibit 2 305 Circle Dr. Staff Presentation REVISED Submitted at Hearing City of Fort Collins f� Landmark Designation: • May be initiated by owner; by 3 or more citizens; or by LPC • Application submitted, reviewed by staff for completeness and accuracy; staff investigates benefits of Landmark designation • Minimum of two public hearings on designation • Commission recommendation to Council • Council decision W J CU W CU LO 0 M 0 W Cn W C C L Q_ N Z x w Packet Pg. 137-6 Item 2, Exhibit 2 305 Circle Dr. Staff Presentation REVISED Submitted at Hearing W J CU w CU LO 0 M 0 W Cn W rM C L Q_ Cn N Z t K W Packet Pg. 137-7 Agenda Item 3 PROJECT NAME CONFLUENCE (PDP170001) - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This proposal is a mixed -use project of residential, office, commercial space, and parking on a 0.4-acre site at 401, 405, and 409 Linden Street in the River Downtown Redevelopment District (RDR). Final review will be a Type 1 hearing with a hearing officer. APPLICANT: Jason Kersley, [au]workshop, IIc., 405 Linden Street OWNER: Space Foundry LLC, 405 Linden Street RECOMMENDATION: Approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking a review and recommendation regarding compliance with Land Use Code Section 3.4.7 for the proposed project. The applicant shared the project with the Landmark Preservation Commission at a work session in April 2015 while in the conceptual development review stage, and submitted the Project Development Plan (PDP) in January 2017. The PDP application is now in its second round of review. ROLE OF THE LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION: At this meeting, the Landmark Preservation Commission will provide review of the project's compliance with LUC 3.4.7. Planning staff has determined that the design of the proposed buildings and the site plan will not undergo significant further changes that would be required to meet other areas of our Land Use Code, and thus it is appropriate for the Commission to comment on the project at this time and provide a recommendation to the decision maker as required by 3.4.7(6). If the Commission feels it lacks sufficient information to provide a recommendation, it may table the item for further review or may place agreed upon conditions on its recommendation for staff to verify in the approval process for the final development plan. POTENTIAL AREA OF ADJACENCY: Staff offers the following suggestion for consideration regarding the area of adjacency for the proposed project. 1. Feeders Supply (Ginger and Baker), 359 Linden Street: contributing building to the Old Town National Register District; individually eligible 2. Stewart-Trupp House & Sign Shop, 320 Willow Street: individually eligible 3. 405 Linden Street: individually eligible 4. 409 Linden Street: individually eligible 5. Remaining tracks of the Greeley, Salt Lake, and Pacific Railroad along Willow Street 6. Archeological resources: Old Fort Site (1860s); Linden Street streetcar line (1908-1923) While the River District contains several additional historic buildings such as Giddings Machine Shop, Ranch -Way Item # 3 Page 1 Packet Pg. 139 Agenda Item 3 Feed, Harmony Mill, and Mawson Lumber that may provide some additional context and reference points, they are at a greater distance from the project and thus were not included in this proposed list. AREA OF ADJACENCY CHARACTERISTICS • Type 0 1904 single -story, wood frame, rectangular "hipped box" residences (405 and 409 Linden) 0 1899 single -story, rectangular commercial building (320 Willow) 0 1911 grain elevator/feed store assemblage of connected single- and 2.5-story buildings (359 Linden) • Size (based on dimensions provided by applicant): 0 Historic buildings range from 936 to 47618 square feet o Height: 14'-9" (320 Willow); 22 feet (405 and 409 Linden); 39 feet (parapet of 359 Linden) 0 Average height of four buildings: 24'-5" • Primary Cladding Materials: 0 2 of the 4 are primarily clad in brick: unpainted, painted, and stuccoed, set in common bond (320 Willow and 359 Linden) 0 2 of the 4 are primarily clad in horizontal siding--wood/vinyl (405 and 409 Linden) • Roof Forms: 0 1 flat roof with flat parapet facade (includes corbelled cornice and galvanized sheet metal flashing) and stepped side walls (320 Willow) 0 2 buildings have hipped roofs with prominent front gables containing 1x1-foot windows (405 and 409 Linden) 0 1 building has a steeply pitched gable with stepped parapet walls and small, side -gabled elevator room • Archeological Potential 0 The fort's parade ground, barracks, mess hall, and storehouse on the site of the project, with reasonable potential to reveal material and information SAMPLE MOTION FOR ESTABLISHING AREA OF ADJACENCY: I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission adopt as the area of adjacency as listed in the staff report for the proposed Confluence project. PROPOSED PROJECT DESIGN: This three -building project has a total building area of 45,763 square feet. It includes a total of 28 dwelling units on upper floors with a total of 40 bedrooms (6 studios, 8 one -bedroom apartments, 2 one bedroom apartments with den, and 12 two -bedroom apartments). The project also includes 8,810 feet of tucked under, ground level parking, ground level commercial/retail space (7,890 square feet) and 2,266 square feet of upper story office space. An upper courtyard connects the upper story residential and office space on the new buildings at 405 and 409 Linden. A pedestrian -level pocket courtyard will extend between the existing one-story building at 405 Linden Street and the new construction. The buildings range from two to five stories with the five -story components positioned at the project site's interior. COMMISSION REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (MAY 10 WORK SESSION): For the Applicant: 1. Provide materials sample board (applicant will present at meeting) 2. Add more notations on relevant slides showing where materials are applied. 3. Add notations to illustrations that indicate information about quantity of each material. Item # 3 Page 2 Packet Pg. 140 Agenda Item 3 4. Starting on p. 141 in the LPC agenda packet, clarify which code sections are referenced. 5. Clarify which points the 12-foot distance between buildings is measured from. Add a note somewhere regarding distance between new construction on Linden Street buildings. 6. Add illustrations showing project as viewed from east side of Linden. 7. Adjust view on page 60 to show full buildings of entire project, keeping Feeders Supply in the view. 8. Add the height of the "tower" building. For Staff: 9. Send audio file and associated report and applicant slide deck from the April 2015 work session (sent via email on 5/15/17). 10. Update staff report and associated slide deck to include quantified information regarding area of adjacency. REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS OF FACT: Land Use Code (LUC) Section 3.4.7, Historic and Cultural Resources contains the applicable standards for new buildings, where designated or eligible historic landmarks or historic districts are part of the development site or surrounding neighborhood context. The proposed mixed -use project at Willow and Linden Streets is adjacent to several historic resources and therefore is subject to compliance with Land Use Code Section 3.4.7. LUC Section 3.4.7(A), Purpose, states in pertinent part: "This Section is intended to ensure that, to the maximum extent feasible:... new construction is designed to respect the historic character of the site and any historic properties in the surrounding neighborhood. This Section is intended to protect designated or individually eligible historic sites, structures or objects as well as sites, structures or objects in designated historic districts, whether on or adjacent to the development site." LUC 3.4.7(B) General Standard states: "If the project contains a site, structure or object that (1) is determined to be or potentially be individually eligible for local landmark designation or for individual listing in the State Register of Historic Properties or National Register of Historic Places; (2) is officially designated as a local or state landmark or is listed on the National Register of Historic Places; or (3) is located within an officially designated national, state or City historic district or area, then, to the maximum extent feasible, the development plan and building design shall provide for the preservation and adaptive use of the historic structure. The development plan and building design shall protect and enhance the historical and architectural value of any historic property that is: (a) preserved and adaptively used on the development site; or (b) is located on property adjacent to the development site and qualifies under (1), (2) or (3) above ... ... New structures must be compatible with the historic character of any such historic property, whether on the development site or adjacent thereto." LUC 3.4.7(F) New Construction: "(1) To the maximum extent feasible, the height, setback and width of new structures shall be similar to: (a) those of existing historic structures on any block face on which the new structure is located and on any portion of a block face across a local or collector street from the block face on which the new structure is located.... Notwithstanding the foregoing, this requirement shall not apply if, in the judgment of the decision maker, such historic structures would not be negatively impacted with respect to their historic exterior integrity and significance by reason of the new structure being constructed at a dissimilar height, setback and width. Where building setbacks cannot be maintained, elements such as walls, columns, hedges or other screens shall be used to define the edge of the site and maintain alignment. Taller structures or portions of structures shall be located interior to the site." The project's overall footprint is dissimilar to the individual historic buildings, but the massing strategy and similarity created at the transition edges mitigate the negative impact on directly adjacent historic resources. Features that Item # 3 Page 3 Packet Pg. 141 Agenda Item 3 contribute to compatibility include: • Stepped back massing above the third story and courtyard separation for elevation that flanks 405/409 Linden • Stepped back massing down to two story with one-story, 13'-2" "porch" massing adjacent to 320 Willow Street • Simple massing of two-story brick building module reflects adjacent simple brick massing of small commercial building at 320 Willow • Highest masses are concentrated at center of the project site • Height of three-story component on corner building (37'-6") corresponds to parapet roof height of 359 Linden (39'-011 ) • Setbacks are respectful of historic buildings • Width of adjacent massing includes modules that reflect historic 25-foot lot dimensions "(2) New structures shall be designed to be in character with such existing historic structures. Horizontal elements, such as cornices, windows, moldings and sign bands, shall be aligned with those of such existing historic structures to strengthen the visual ties among buildings. Window patterns of such existing structures (size, height, number) shall be repeated in new construction, and the pattern of the primary building entrance facing the street shall be maintained to the maximum extent feasible." The overall design of the project is a modern addition to the area that responds primarily to the design guidelines for the R-D-R District. Like the massing strategy, the project design relies on use of more traditional elements in the elevations immediately adjacent to historic buildings to create compatible transition to the historic buildings. Features that contribute to compatibility include: • Enclosed one-story "porch" element on Willow elevation references porch at 320 Willow. • Ground level storefront transparency (relates to Feeders storefront) • Character of corner building at Willow and Linden references the industrial character of 359 Linden • Paired, vertically oriented windows in punched openings adjacent to 405 and 409 Linden. • Ground floor store front height aligns with eave height on 405 and 409 Linden. • Commercial storefront and door adjacent to 405 and 409 Linden reflect similar irregular, off -center composition. "(3) The dominant building material of such existing historic structures adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the proposed structure shall be used as the primary material for new construction. Variety in materials can be appropriate, but shall maintain the existing distribution of materials in the same block. " Regarding quantity of materials for a project that consists of several buildings with a variable massing strategy, staff notes that the transitions at the edges of the project are of primary importance. As this project is in the heart of the River District, the material choices should also reflect those design guidelines. Brick (including stuccoed and painted brick) and horizontal wood siding are the primary materials in the historic area of adjacency. Appropriate material choices that reflect materials used on the historic buildings include: • Iron brick: the primary material, applied in running bond, for the building module immediately abutting the brick building at 320 Willow • White stucco plaster: the cladding for the rooftop addition of the corner building references the white stuccoed brick at 359 Linden • Corrugated steel, board -formed concrete: reference historic building materials at 359 Linden • Horizontal stained wood siding: used on elevations immediately adjacent to 405 and 409 Linden • Local sandstone: used on the base of the massing adjacent to 405 and 409 Linden to reflect the sandstone foundations of those buildings "(4) Visual and pedestrian connections between the site and neighborhood focal points, such as a park, school or church, shall be preserved and enhanced, to the maximum extent feasible." Staff has no specific concerns regarding this section of the code. Item # 3 Page 4 Packet Pg. 142 Agenda Item 3 "(5) To the maximum extent feasible, existing historic and mature landscaping shall be preserved, and when additional street tree plantings are proposed, the alignment and spacing of new trees shall match that of the existing trees. There are no specific concerns regarding this section of the code and new tree plantings will be approved according to the requirements of the City Forester. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings of fact, staff concludes that the development plan does not impact the eligibility of adjacent historic properties and its design is compatible with the existing historic character in the area of adjacency, and thus supports a recommendation for approval of Confluence, PDP #170001. SAMPLE MOTION FOR RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL: If the Commission agrees that the project is compatible with Land Use Code section 3.4.7 and is ready to complete its development review of the proposed Confluence project, it may propose a motion based on the following: "I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to the Decision Maker approval of the Confluence project (PDP170001), finding it is in compliance with the standards contained in Land Use Code section 3.4.7 in regard to compatibility with the character of the project's area of adjacency for the following reasons: • The project does not impact the individual eligibility for designation of the historic properties in the defined area of adjacency. • The project design employs a massing strategy at the transition edges that is compatible with the historic context and situates taller elements at the interior of the project site. • The project includes primary building materials on the elevations immediately abutting historic properties that are reflective of the dominant historic materials. • The project provides multiple design elements that create visual ties to buildings within the adjacent historic context. Note: The Commission may propose additional findings of fact or remove any of these proposed findings according to its evaluation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Confluence Development Review_Updated Staff Presentation_ (PDF) 2. Confluence Applicant Presentation (PDF) 3. Confluence - Plan of Protection - DRAFT (PDF) 4. Confluence - Site, Grading & Drainage Plans - DRAFT (PDF) 5. 359 Linden St. - Cultural Resource Re -Evaluation Form (PDF) 6. DOE Review Results_405 Linden_2017 (PDF) 7. DOE Review Results for 409 Linden_2017 (PDF) 8. 320 Willow_Eligibility Review_March 2016 (PDF) 9. 320 Willow_State Survey Form_2001 (PDF) Item # 3 Page 5 Packet Pg. 143 5 3.a Provide recommendation to the decision maker (Type 1 - hearing officer) for the development proposal based on compliance with Land Use Code Section 3.4.7. Code requires new construction to respect the historic character of surrounding historic properties on or adjacent to the development site. Packet Pg. 144 5 3.a rCity of rr�trs • Mixed -use project • 3 buildings • Total building area • 2 to 5 stories = 45,763 square feet • 5-story components positioned at interior • 28 residential units on upper floors (40 bedrooms) • 81810 feet of tucked under, ground level parking • 7,890 square feet of ground level commercial/retail space • 2,266 square feet of upper story office space • Upper courtyard connecting upper story residential and office space • Pedestrian -level pocket courtyard between project and 405 Linden Street City of FortCottins _f� • Materials: • Additional details on material choices, application, and quantity • Material sample board • Dimensions: • Indicate "tower" building height • Clarify measurement points for 12'-foot distance from 320 Willow • New Views: • Modify view looking south on Linden to show entire project • Add illustration showing project seen from east side of Linden Packet Pg. 145 5 3.a City of ,.F6rt_f� 405 and 409 Linden (1904) 359 Linden (1911) 320 Willow (1899) Packet Pg. 146 5 3.a rCity of rr�trs Type: • 1904 single -story, and 409 Linden) wood frame, rectangular "hipped box" residences (405 • 1899 single -story, rectangular commercial building (320 Willow) • 1911 grain elevator/feed store assemblage of connected single- and 2.5- story buildings (359 Linden) Size (based on dimensions provided by applicant): • Historic buildings range from 936 to 4,618 square feet • Height: 14-9" (320 Willow); 22 feet (405 and 409 Linden); 39 feet (parapet of 359 Linden) • Average height of 4 buildings: 24'-5" City of FortCottins _f� Primary Cladding Materials: • 2 of 4 buildings are clad in brick: unpainted, painted, and stuccoed, set in common bond (320 Willow and 359 Linden) • 2 of 4 buildings are clad in horizontal siding—wood/vinyl (405 and 409 Linden) Roof Forms: • 1 flat roof with flat parapet fagade (includes corbelled cornice and galvanized sheet metal flashing) and stepped side walls (320 Willow) • 2 hipped roofs, prominent front gables (405 and 409 Linden) • 1 steeply pitched gable with stepped parapet walls and small, side - gabled elevator room Packet Pg. 147 5 3.a City of ,.F6rt_f� • The project does not impact the individual eligibility for designation of the historic properties in the defined area of adjacency. • The project design employs a massing strategy at the transition edges that is compatible with the historic context and situates taller elements at the interior of the project site. • The project includes primary building materials on the elevations immediately abutting historic properties that are reflective of the dominant historic materials. • The project provides multiple design elements that create visual ties to buildings within the adjacent historic context. Packet Pg. 148 5 3.a rCity of rr�trs • Based on those findings, its design is compatible with the existing historic character in the area of adjacency • The development plan does not impact the eligibility of adjacent historic properties Recommendation of approval of the Confluence Project Development Plan, PDP #170001 Packet Pg. 149 3.b 4 0 1 LINDEN STREET 0 IN THE RIVER DISTRICT LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION REVIEW FOLLOW-UP PRESENTATION MAY 17, 2017 (ORIGINAL PRESENTATION WAS APRIL 22, 2015) M-ARCorkshopHs [SPACE] U N B A N O E V E L O P N E N T SAUNDERS Building Confidence" c 0 Y v a. a c 0 U El Packet Pg. 150 3.b CONTENTS: 1. HISTORIC CONTEXT 6. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 3.4.7 2, LAND USE CODE / ZONING CONTEXT-RDR DISTRICT SUMMARY 7. HEIGHT, SETBACKS AND MASSING 3, URBAN DESIGN / RIVER DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES 8, DOMINANT BUILDING MATERIALS 4. REDEVELOPMENT CONTEXT 5. PROJECT SUMMARY 9. ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER 10. SOLAR SHADE STUDIES Packet Pg. 151 3.b II. HISTORIC CONTEXTS The history of the Old Fort Site was divided into seven distinct sub -contexts: 4 • 6 • 7 • Canip Collins and the Fort Collins Military Reservation. 18644867 Initial Post-Abandomnent Activity in the Old Fort Site .Area. 186 74871 The Fort Collins Town Site and Early Community Development in the Old Fort Site Area. 187'4902 The Sugar Beet Industry Stimulates Development and Urban Growth, 190?-1910 The Union Pacific Railroad Transforms the Old Fort Site Area. 1910-20 Mixed Uses. 1920-1945 really "multiple" uses PostmWorld War H Land Use in the Old Fort Site Area The time span and thematic orientation of these sub -contexts was based upon major events or patterns of events that helped shape the physical and social history of the study area. These historic periods are discussed in detail in the following sections. 8...... Current redevelopment and mixed -use infill HISTORICO I Packet Pg. 152 3.b *Aogo4/ow )t. X Awl it ,r re ¢ �• b f/ !/'f111 bF' •00r l.,If tn' Ys ` f.. 4 mftaoo� ).sgfd d n C\Came c oll;na _ Q .�� :i: c w E s U W HISTORk< CO FROM: HISTORICAL CONTEXTS FOR 49 THE OLD FORT SITE, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, 1864-2002, PAGE 86 or CONTEXT CIRCA 1866 r� 049 rr '1 3 s 00 Jam, ■ \ q7 • y ■ pI ■ r • r4 ■ , Y 0,9y r� r rs. 3.b o Y 410 a f � U ? rr a v l U a! HISTORICCorPacket Pg. 154 • . - _ r '/ (. \ . ,,.` ' ' 1^�.. ram! 1.r , �• , i� -V off 00 qj off Fog f•• - - I ON to io- fb ' , ` r _ of gg Id of t go w lb .: .�. .b fool ..-� Ile. oo 1Tom•'#' - r•. ..o•• . ..n a - 'r a•S r '�' ` y-; - yf /LLOw - r. • vV•� w •�.. t ��•�• FROM "HISTORICAL CONTEXTS FOR THE OLD FORT SITE, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, 1864-2002" PAGE 86 76, 7�yQ� 7S 7� x' 72 . ?(?q i 77 70 `: . s � EST OFF., ' / QTFjS. 3 ? /864'.1 7 42 HREE USES \� BARRACKS 7� 1864 4 GUARD HODU /�ME 1 A 7s 7 71 , ,s 70 r E,KST OFF. QTRS R Cache La P�dre River rs r7 9 3.b P Y FORTC®ll.oLINS, COLORADO a. Y LEGEND CL Building Footprint Approximate Building Location U Parade Ground Cache la Poudre River a, L� Parcel o Study Area c v E U a HISTORICC 0 Packet Pg. 156 low it ow tooll - �. :;.. AAA WIMIlk i � r i � iI■1 !— �� � � � yea^— ,, � �' � � , a�7�� 326 WILLOW STREET 405 AND 409 LINDEN STREET Staff Analysis (April 2015): Adjacent properties to this proposed project - 405 and 409 Linden Street and 326 Willow Street - have previously been determined individually eligible for designation as Fort Collins Landmarks. Thus, particular attention should focus on the interface and compatibility between the proposed building and the existing historic buildings in terms of massing, character, materials, design, etc. 3.b FROM: HISTORICAL CONTEXTS FOR THE OLD FORT SITE, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, 1864- 2002, PAGE 39 Designated Properties and Registration Requirements The only remaining industrial facility associated with this time period — the Lindell Mills (now Ranch -Way Feeds) - is already designated as a Local Landmark. One of the two remaining commercial building (the Stewart sign painting shop) was evaluated in 1992 as ineligible for the NRHP, without concurrence from SHPO. The latter building, located at 326 Willow Street, exhibits excellent physical integrity, is a unique example of small scale brick commercial architecture in the Old Fort Site. The building's architectural significance is not sufficient for inclusion on the state or national registers of historic places, but the property meets the City's architectural importance criterion qualifying it for designation as a Local Landmark. The extant dwellings fi-om this time period are similar in style and materials to housesLa found commonly in the older poitions of the &Tastside" and "Westside" 0 neighborhoods of Fort Collins. All of these dwellings appear to be in only fair condition. Two of these — the Wilcox House at 408-410 Linden Street, and the vernacular dwelling y v at 308 Willow Street, have been extensively modified. None of these properties embody a` sufficient architectural or historical significance to qualify individually for the NRHP or SRHP. In order to qualify for Local Landmark designation, residential buildings from Q this time period must retain a substantial degree of their original design and materials, or exhibit other unique qualities. Using these criteria, the only dwellings likely to presently U qualify for Local Landmark designation are the wood frame "hipped boxes" at 405 and 409 Linden Street, which are good examples of the style as well as small-scale working o U Y house at 408-410 Linden Street would qualify for Local Landmark designation under the historical importance criterion for its association with prominent Larimer County dairyman George Wilcox. EXIISTIING, ciT HISTORICC 1 Packet Pg. 158 3.b 401 LINDEN STREET (to be demoliShed) o C Q Q N V C N 7 w C O U Y C� C t U W EXISTING SIT HISTORICC Packet Pg. 159 3.b v., Linden Street Context Willow Street Context al EXISTING SITE HISTORIC C I Packet Pg. 160 3.b RDR ZONING SUMMARY— FORT COLLINS LAND USE CODE 4.17(A) ...opportunities for more intensive redevelopment of housing, businesses and workplaces to complement downtown ... extend the positive characteristics of Downtown such as the pattern of blocks, pedestrian -oriented streetfronts and lively outdoor spaces. 4.17(D) (2) (a) augment streets with additional connections, (b) minimize driveways (c) augment Linden Streetscape 4.17(D) (3) (b) Height/Mass. Multiple story buildings of up to five (5) stories are permitted, provided that massing is terraced back ...from streets so that multiple story buildings Y are ...are stepped down to three (3) stories or less abutting any street frontage. Such terraced massing shall be a significant and integral aspect of the building design. a Where new buildings are placed next to existing shorter buildings that are expected to remain, the new buildings must be stepped down in such a manner as to minimize their impact on the shorter buildings. a LAND USE CODE/ZONING C PacketPg.161 3.b RDR ZONING SUMMARY— FORT COLLINS LAND USE CODE 4.17(D) (3) (b)5. Outdoor spaces and amenities. To the extent reasonably feasible, all development shall provide on -site outdoor space such as courtyard, plaza, patio or other pedestrian -oriented outdoor space. To the extent reasonably feasible, outdoor spaces shall be visible from the street and shall be visually or physically connected with any outdoor spaces on adjacent properties. 4.17(D)(3)(c) Character and Image. New buildings ...demonstrate compatibility with the historical agricultural/industrial characteristics of the District... include simple rectilinear building shapes, simple rooflines, juxtaposed building masses that directly express interior volumes/functions, visible structural components and joinery, details formed by brickwork, sandstone, sills, lintels, headers and foundations and details formed by joinery of structural materials. 1. Outdoor spaces. Buildings and extensions of buildings ...form architectural outdoor spaces such as balconies, arcades, terraces, decks or courtyards. (continues) LAND USE CODE/ZONING C Packet Pg. 162 3.b RDR ZONING SUMMARY — FORT COLLINS LAND USE CODE 4.17(D) (3) (c) (continued) 2. Windows .individually defined with detail elements ... to define the building stories and establish human scale and proportion... placed in a symmetrical pattern relative to the wall and massing. Glass curtain walls and spandrel -glass strip windows shall not be used as the predominant style of fenestration... 3. Roof forms. Flat, shed and gable roof forms corresponding to massing and interior volumes/functions shall be the dominant roof forms. Flat -roofed masonry La buildings shall feature three-dimensional cornice treatment integral with masonry on all walls facing streets, the River or connecting walkways. Additional decorative Y shaped cornices in wood (or other material indistinguishable from wood) shall be Q permitted in addition to the top masonry cornice treatment. Sloped metal roofs are allowed.... 0 U Y C C t U W Q LAND USE CODE/ZONING C C Packet Pg. 163 3.b RDR ZONING SUMMARY — FORT COLLINS LAND USE CODE 4.17(D) (3) (c) (continued) 4. Materials ... contribute to visual continuity within the District. Textured materials W LU with native and historic characteristics, such as brick, stone, wood, architectural CD CD cast stone and synthetic stone in historically compatible sandstone patterns only,CD architectural metals and materials with similar characteristics and proportions shall be used in a repeating pattern as integral parts of the exterior building fabric.LU J U. Masonry units must wrap around the corners of walls so as to not appear as an applied surface treatment. Other exterior materials, if any, shall be used as integral La parts of the overall building fabric, in repeating modules, proportioned both r Y horizontally and vertically to relate to human scale, and with enough depth at joints Y between architectural elements to cast shadows, in order to better ensure that the character and image of new buildings are visually related to the Downtown and River context. Lapped aluminum siding, vinyl siding, smooth -face concrete Y masonry units, synthetic stucco coatings and imitation brick are prohibited. v E a LAND USE CODE/ZONING C Packet Pg. 164 3.b RDR ZONING SUMMARY - FORT COLLINS LAND USE CODE 4.17(D) (3) (c) (continued) 5. Primary entrance ..clearly identified ...oriented to a major street, pedestrian way, place, courtyara and/or other key public space...feature a sheltering element such as a canopy or be defined by a recess or a simple surround. 6. Accent features... must complement and not dominate the overall composition and design ...and may include secondary entrances, loading docks, garage bays, balconies, canopies, cupolas, vertical elevator/stair shafts and other similar features. Awnings and canopies . must complement the character of the building ..subordinate to the facade. Setback requirements: alone other than above level 3 on street frontages. v a Floor Area Ratio Limitations: None. LAND USE CODE/ZONING C PacketPg.165 3.b VISION FOR THE RIVER DISTRICT Some recently constructed local brewery buildings provide design inspiration for new buildings that reflect the dis- trict's agricultural -industrial heritage. The vision for the River Downtown Redevelopment Zone District is that it will be an active place, where the river, industry, art and history come together to provide a vibrant complement to Old Town Fort Col- lins. A mix of uses, including housing, commercial and industrial activities eniov the amenities of the river and preserved natural areas. Modern housing, restau- rants, shops and office buildings join with established industrial enterprises to reflect the district's historic past and celebrate its future. Everyone enjoys the rec- reational opportunities found there. In the future, the River Downtown Redevelopment Zone District connects Old Town with the Poudre River, and celebrates its agricultural and industrial architecture and the rich history of the area. It does solin creative ways that express a look to the future, while respecting the past. I he area Will a known tor new, well -designed infill buildings and landscapes that offer opportunities for business and industry and also facilitate relaxation, exposure to cultural activities and civic interaction. Redevelopment and new devel- opment projects will be expected to respect and be sensitive to the established ag-industrial character that extinguishes the River Downtown Redevelopment Zone District. MODERN HOUSING RESTAURANTS, SHOPS AND OFFICE BUILDINGS JOIN WITH ESTABLISHED INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES IN CREATIVE WAYS THAT EXPRESS A LOOK TO THE FUTURE River District Design Guidelines I June 2014 URBAN DESIGN / RIVER DISTRICT DESIGN GUIPri PacketPg.166 KEY PRINCIPLES FOR DESIGN 3.b These design principles establish expectations for design at a "high level" for the River Downtown Redevelopment Zone District and shall apply to all improvement projects. ACHIEVE EXCELLENCE IN DESIGN YESEach project in the district should express excellence in design, and it should raise the bar for others to follow. This includes using high quality materials and construction methods and paying attention to detail. YES PROMOTE CREATIVITY Innovation in design is welcomed in the district. Ex- ploring new ways of designing buildings and spaces is appropriate when they contribute to a cohesive urban fabric. This type of creativity should be distinguished from simply being "different," YES DESIGN WITH AUTHENTICITY The district should be defined by buildings and places that reflect their own time. The result should be a sense of authenticity in building and materials. All new improvements should convey this quality. YES DESIGN WITH CONSISTENCY Buildings and places in the district should have a co- hesive quality in the use of materials, organization of functions and overall design. Each new project should also embody a single, consistent design concept. River District Design Guidelines 11 June 2014 Achieve excellence in design. Design with consistency and use materials with long term dura- bility. Design with authenticity. Promote creativity. Key Principles for Design 25 URBAN DESIGN / RIVER DISTRICT DESIGN GUIf ' Packet Pg. 167 CYE YES YES CYE YES DESIGN FOR DURABILITY Buildings and spaces in the district should be designed for the long term with durable materials. DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABILITY Aspects of cultural, economic and environmental sus- tainability that relate to urban design should be woven into all new improvements. ENHANCE THE PUBLIC REALM Sidewalks, promenades and other pedestrian ways should be designed to invite their use through thought- ful planning and design. Improvement on private prop- erty also should enhance the public realm where they abut. ENHANCE THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE Each improvement project should contribute to a pedestrian -friendly environment. This includes defining street edges with buildings and spaces that are visually interesting and that attract pedestrian activity. PROVIDE SIGNATURE OPEN SPACES These include public and private yards, promenades, plazas and courtyards. Enhance natural resources and habitat for wildlife on -site, for the public to experience. KEEP THE PARKING SUBORDINATE Parking lots and parking structures should support other functions and not dominate the setting. They should be visually buffered. 26 Key Principles for Design Design for sustainability. Enhance the public realm. 3.b I Enhance the pedestrian experience. Provide signature open spaces. Keep the automobile subordinate. River District Design Guidelines June 2014 URBAN DESIGN / RIVER DISTRICT DESIGN GUIPri Packet PT, a H* 'VI 4 1� Ilk►�L'ir s- ?RM vp 147 Mom A .s r l io A 3.b —i AeL� m.,w L 4 . IF .f !� law I - - Fir►- I 7Inot .0 ns L'i I _ I 1. 1 - FO% — ft�— w�- € s r J . a* / , /i_ Uzi'-,j`�SYPrFI` 3.b Redevelopment Summary Goals for CONFLUENCE: Strengthen the urban environment of Fort Collins' River District by creating street wall and deliberately formed, compelling urban spaces. Strive for Authenticity —details, materials and architectural character derived from real needs and purpose —not facsimiles of construction methods or typologies no longer present. Deliver a sustainable building —urban smart and energy efficient. Contribute to a vibrant neighborhood with a variety of uses and users 24 hours/7 days week. Create dynamic spaces inside and out. Respect history, but emphasize the evolving character of the River District. Provide parking on -site, but hide it. PROJECTSt "i Packet Pg. 171 3.b PROJECT SUMMARY ZONING: SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA: DWELLINGS: OFFICE AREA: RETAIL AREA: COMMON INTERIOR AREA PARKING AREA: CONSTRUCTION COST: TOTAL DEVEL. COST: CONSTRUCTION START: OCCUPANCY DATE: Q4 2018 RDR (River Redevel. 17)450 SF, 0.4 acres 45,763 SF Dist.) and TOD overlay zone 28,480 SF, 28 UNITS, 77.8 du/ac 2,266 SF 7,890 SF 7,130 SF 8,810 SF, 30 PARKING SPACES, 295 gsf/space $11,300,000 $14,000,000 Q4 2017 PROJECTS l "I Packet Pg. 172 NARRATIVE Confluence, a mixed -use project composed of office, housing, retail and requisite parking will help create a vital and energized heart to the River District. Located at the center of the original Fort Collins parade ground our corner site is likely as close as any building can come to the center of the point from which the city grew. Even though the fort was short-lived in the city's history, its name and the urban geometries it inspired live in perpetuity. Background Spacefoundry, Ilc has acquired three different properties in the River District, 401 Linden Street, 405 Linden Street and the back 106 feet of 409 Linden Street for redevelopment. For the purposes of this development a new consolidated parcel will be created consisting of all three parcels, hereafter referred to as Confluence. This consolidation creates a significant lot for the River Downtown Redevelopment (R-D-R) District. The Land Use Code states the purpose of the R-D-R district is to 'reestablish the linkage between Old Town and the River through redevelopment in the Cache la Poudre River Corridor'. This corner site will be one of the anchor sites in the District for this purpose in its ability to: Create a strong street wall focused corner/anchor building at the heart of the district; Continue the physical/urban linkage of Linden Street and Old Town to the river; and make a strong pedestrian -oriented street wall connection between the new building and the proposed Willow Street improvements — and specifically the planned plaza at the corner. We believe we have created a concept for an exciting and unique mixed -use infill project for this redevelopment site that addresses our community's environmental, social, and economic needs. Development Team Spacefoundry, Ilc focuses on development of catalytic urban projects that improve the cityscape and create authentic, quality buildings and the spaces between them. Spacefoundry will be joined by additional investors who share this vision. [au]workshop I architects+urbanists (a current tenant in the 405 Linden building) , create quality, authentic architecture and catalytic urban, civic and commercial projects with a focus on projects that sustainably invigorate neighborhoods and cities. With active architecture and master planning projects throughout the western United States and Asia, architects Randy Shortridge and Jason Kersley founded the firm in 2013 after a combined 40 years of experience locally, nationally and internationally in a wide variety of typologies. Helping clients realize their visions, striving to add value by elegantly organizing uses, creating great places and developing cost conscious design strategies are the basis of [au]workshop's mission. [au]workshop's consultant team will consist of local design and engineering consultants with a track record of similar projects. Concept Confluence will become a mixed -use building in the truest sense. The corner of Willow and Linden Streetsthecenter and heart of the rapidly redeveloping River Districtwillinclude street -oriented commercial / retail uses with residential above. The fourth story will be market -rate two story residential units set back from the street wall. Tuck -under, completely hidden parking will occupy the property behind 405 and 409 Linden and will be topped with three stories of residential uses oriented to Poudre Street. Residences adjacent to Poudre Street will open onto a raised courtyard. In addition to the residences, approximately 2,100 square foot of office space that will also open onto this raised courtyard with identity from Linden Street. Structured outdoor pedestrian spaces will allow the building occupants to enjoy the private courtyard. The existing house at 405 Linden, recently converted to commercial/retail space is not a part of the project and will be maintained with minor exterior renovations to respect its current scale and character and will share a common street level courtyard with Confluence. Parking and Service Access Strategy As there is currently limited on -street parking and little off street public parking in the River District, the project will need to meet long-term demand spaces on -site and will rely on adjacent streets or future district parking structures for short-term/visitor parking. Due to the consolidation of the three lots no additional curb cuts to access parking or service areas are required along Willow or Linden Streets. Our plan is to have all parking accessed from Poudre Street. 30 parking spaces are provided, 27 of them covered and hidden from adjacent streets. Urban Design It is our intention to create a strong example of quality development similar to the nearby Block One project in accordance with the newly adopted River District Design Guidelines and as prescribed by the Mixed Use Development Standards in the Fort Collins Land Use Code "to promote the design of an urban environment that is built to human scale to encourage attractive street fronts and other connecting walkways that accommodate pedestrians as the first priority, while also accommodate(ing) vehicular movement." 3.b Buildings will create a continuous street edge along Linden and Willow Streets with the extension of the pedestrian amenities, tree grates, lightin( streetscape and diagonal parking that have been incorporated on tl- c adjacent blocks. Buildings will set back from the street edge adjacent 1 neighboring existing structures of the "single family house" typology. The ground floor commercial spaces are to be along the public ROW an o uses are to be accessed directly from Linden and Willow Strei tA improvements. Along the Willow frontage allowance will be made for tl- possibility of outdoor seating areas fronting the new plaza with the intentic C of adding life to the streetscape. A pedestrian pocket courtyard will extend from Linden Street between tl- u new building and the existing one-story building at 405 Linden to access th c building lobby and the raised courtyard. Ground level tenant spaces w activate the courtyard and provide pedestrian engagement. These grour level tenant spaces are well suited for a cafe or kiosk type tenant servin cc pedestrians actively using the courtyard and adjacent Linden frontage. Building Massing The R-D-R District allows for buildings up to five stories tall terraced bac from adjacent streets above the third story. Our buildings will comply wit these requirements and go further by terracing down to two stories alon frontages abutting adjacent "single-family house" structures that exist c flanking sites. Our buildings will provide a variety of massing to avoid torn uninterrupted facades per the Zoning Code and the highest masses will It concentrated toward the center of the site. c Architectural Character and Image a c The proposed buildings will respond to the Land Use Code's Mixed UE H Development Standards and the newly adopted River District Desig a Guidelines and will contribute to the uniqueness of the river district and al: respond carefully to the river front relationship. Some specific responsE may include, but are not limited to: a • Clearly articulated fagade rhythms and fenestration patterns frontin ¢a Linden and Willow, including a typical 25 foot horizontal module four u throughout the downtown area modified to a unique massing characti w as the building addresses the dual frontages. 3 w • Use of large, well proportioned window apertures required by model c uses. v c a, E L PROJECTSIL"i Packet Pg. 173 NARRATIVE (continued) 3.b • Appropriately proportional ground level storefront types on primary streets as found elsewhere in the downtown area mixed with the industrial character of ground levels • Clearly expressed pedestrian entrances • Articulated base, middle and top • Recognition of the neighborhood Center (at the intersection of Linden and Willow) and significance of the project as it is approached from all directions • Unique architectural and urban design details • Inclusion of a marker on the Linden fagade showing the approximate location of the original fort flag pole Landscape Concept The urban streetscape treatment along the Linden Street frontage has been established and the Willow Street frontage currently in design is intended to be a rich pedestrian environment — a direct extension of the new adjacent Linden Street streetscape treatments. Other outdoor seating areas and spaces adjacent to the building (such as in the pocket park) will have a similar treatment with planter pots, site furniture, and railings that visually integrate with the building architecture. The second story courtyard will be landscaped with planter pots of various sizes (up to ornamental tree scale). Fourth story terraces fronting Linden and Willow will feature a continuous planter with annual plantings, and will create a unique focal point in the River District. Site Utilities There are four new 6" sanitary sewer taps planned for the proposed building to accommodate the residential and commercial/office uses, which will connect to existing sanitary mains along Linden and Poudre. Proposed domestic water line and fire line services will connect to an existing 12-inch water line along Willow Street. One domestic water service will be provided for residential use and one domestic service will be provided for commercial/office/restaurant use. There is an existing fire hydrant directly in front of the 401 Linden Street property which is planned to be relocated to better accommodate the bus stop along Linden in relation to the plaza. If provided, a grease trap can be provided within the property boundaries on either the Linden or Willow Frontages. At this time it is assumed that all dry utility services (telephone, electric, and gas) for the proposed development will be serviced from existing mains along Linden and Willow Streets and the alley. Electrical transformers will be hidden in an under ground vault. Service and Trash A trash and recycling enclosure for the entire project will be located within the building with access along Poudre Street. PROJECTSIL"i Packet Pg. 174 3.b URBAN DESIGN APPROACH Existing Conditions: Fragmented urban forms with a variety of building types, morphologies and scales. Evolving, yet indistinct district identity other than individual buildings of various uses from multiple eras. New development needs to infill and transition gracefully between disparate types. The recently completed River District Design Guidelines give guidance. Recent and proposed projects provide examples to emulate or avoid. PROJECTS l "i Packet Pg. 175 • �mop • 'r LU w o ..�T �W W v 1 S IL IL a AV A� Z LU LL P.. � �i � Z � LO „• LO op j � N - % a. •' J a _ � Q v •w AFO U ✓ I ZA C H 0 dF � U A 1 - '.� • A p Q % _ - ` i • _ Packet Pg. 176 7 �— o VQk. 3.b POUDRE FEED SUPPLY WOLVERINE'PRESS 326 WILLOW 4 rrf � 1 FLOOR • uirr AdL rd _ _ E3 409 Packet Pg. 178 C SECOND LEVEL PLAN Cll LINDEN PROPOSED USE PROJECT SUS �.� r (D r. Z Soo 01 14-434 OIL* -� lbo 00 4-3 7' OldfffR'Dfillery: Approx. 37' (65' at Block One: Approx. 51' (66' at tower) *All dimensions are approxim AREA00F ADJACENCY MASSING ANALYS COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 3.4.7(F) NEW CONSTR - :, CODE SECTION PROJECT RESPONSE s.b (1) To the maximum extent feasible, the height, setback and width of new structures shall be similar to: (a) those of existing historic structures on any block face on which the new structure is located and on any portion of a block face across a local or collector street from the block face on which the new structure is located; or (b) when a block does not exist, similar to those on any land adjacent to the property on which the new structure is to be located. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this requirement shall not apply if, in the judgment of the decision maker, such historic structures would not be negatively impacted with respect to their historic exterior integrity and significance by reason of the new structure being constructed at a dissimilar height, setback and width. Where building setbacks cannot be maintained, elements such as walls, columns, hedges or other screens shall be used to define the edge of the site and maintain alignment. Taller structures or portions of structures shall be located interior to the site. (2) New structures shall be designed to be in character with such existing historic structures. Horizontal elements, such as cornices, windows, moldings and sign bands, shall be aligned with those of such existing historic structures to strengthen the visual ties among buildings. Window patterns of such existing structures (size, height, number) shall be repeated in new construction, and the pattern of the primary building entrance facing the street shall be maintained to the maximum extent feasible. (3) The dominant building material of such existing historic structures adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the proposed structure shall be used as the primary material for new construction. Variety in materials can be appropriate, but shall maintain the existing distribution of materials in the same block. A great deal of effort has been made with building massing and setbacks to break down the overal' massing and mediate between our project and neighboring buildings (particularly on the primary frontages) and taller structures are setback from the street or are located interior to site. 405 and 409 Linden: Setback in plan, multiple setbacks in massing and building separation with ar intervening courtyard. Width of adjacent massing reflects typical original plat site width of 25 feet. 326 Willow Stewart-Trupp House & Shop: Setback in plan, multiple setbacks in massing (down tc one story) and building separation. One story massing also helps to hide required gas metes location. Width of adjacent massing reflects typical original plat site width of 25 feet. Feeder's Supply: Alignment with Linden property line to match commercial building typology Setback on upper floors to match Feeder's Supply massing break. Remaining Tracks: Building alignment on Willow reflects ROW dedication as a result of origina track location. Immediately adjacent elements are designed to be in character with their closest historic neighbor. z 405 and 409 Linden: Paired vertically oriented windows. Ground floor store front height reflect! 0 scale of eaves. Simple cornice. Commercial storefront is irregular and door is off center to reflect n the houses' irregular porch and window compositions. La 326 Willow Stewart-Trupp House & Shop: Small scale elements include an enclosed one stork o porch attached to a modest two story iron infused brick (both red-ish and metallic at the saME v time) laid up in a common bond. No cornice. Small-scale massing and material shifts to matcF y existing with small-scale rooftop addition. a Feeder's Supply: Corner building leans to industrial commercial character —function first storefront arrangement and straight -forward window pattern with structurally expressive cornice. a a a 405 and 409 Linden: Local sandstone base and ship -lapped stained wood horizontal siding witl• U simple cornice on immediately adjacent massing. w 326 Willow Stewart-Trupp House & Shop: Iron infused brick (both red-ish and metallic at the same time) laid up in a common bond on immediately adjacent massing. Feeder's Supply: Corner building uses board -formed concrete, natural (corten) steel corrugatec 'E siding, wood cornice and simple form and functionally expressive rooftop addition of white stuccc plaster and wood siding to reflect industrial simplicity of Feeder's Supply and other neighbors. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 3.4.7(F) NEW CONSTRUI Packet Pg. 181 CODE SECTION PROJECT RESPONSE s.b (4) Visual and pedestrian connections between the site and neighborhood focal points, such as a park, school or church, shall be preserved and enhanced, to the maximum extent feasible. (5) To the maximum extent feasible, existing historic and mature landscaping shall be preserved, and when additional street tree plantings are proposed, the alignment and spacing of new trees shall match that of the existing trees. (6) In its consideration of the approval of plans for properties containing or adjacent to sites, structure, objects or districts that: (a) have been determined to be or potentially be individually eligible for local landmark designation or for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places or the State Register of Historic Properties, or (b) are officially designated as a local or state landmark or are listed on the National Register of Historic Places or (c) are located within a officially designated national, state or local historic district or area, the decision maker shall receive and consider a written recommendation from the Landmark Preservation Commission unless the Director has issued a written determination that the plans would not have a significant impact on the individual eligibility or potential individual eligibility of the site, structure, object or district. A determination or recommendation made under this subsection is not appealable to the City Council under Chapter 2 of the City Code. Not specifically applicable: No visual or pedestrian connections are affected. A sincere effort was made to work around a non-historc tree straddling the property line on Linder Street. The landscape architect, the city of FC arborist and the contractor felt it only had a slirr chance of survival. The city of FC arborist was satisfied with our mitigation strategy. No other on. site trees or landscaping was deemed significant. Neighboring buildings at 405 and 409 Linden, 326 Willow (Stewart-Trupp House & Shop) and the Feeder's Supply building are eligible for designation or have been listed at various levels . We have made substantial efforts to respect and mitigate the project's relationship to these resources pei Section 3.4.7. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 3.4.7(F) NEW CONSTRU PacketPg.182 3.b APRIL 2015 LPC WORKSESSION COMMENTS SUMMARY: (time on recording indicated) Commission Member (53:50): Materials too monolithic—change/add more materials. Maybe create formal building at the corner and "older" building behind with differing materials. Response: We believe we have a rich and varied material palette that elegantly responds to its neighbors. We have material changes that vary by building. Commission Member (58:40): Would sloped roofs be appropriate? "not suggesting you go there," a. we see sloped roofs in the district. Materials and forms should reflect the residential history of the z district and what I'm seeing here is a successful accomplishment of that. LL Response: We have incorporated both flat and gently sloped roofs as reflected in several buildings in the district. We have made every effort to vary the massing and break it down as much as possible La to respect various scales of buildings. o o Y Commission Member (63:00): Consider archeological observation during excavation (that might be a. funded by the State or the FC Museum). Response: We have created a Plan of Protection that includes provisions for archeological Q a observation during excavation of undisturbed on -site areas. a Commission Member (68:00): How close is your building to 320 Willow (the sign shop)? Y Response: The new building is about 12 feet from 320. We have provided multiple massing shifts and appropriate material shifts to respect it. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 3.4.7(F) NEW CONSTRU PacketPg.183 HEIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSING STR,� L d .HEIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSING L HEIGHT, SETBACKS &MASSING STR,r= L=-2, 1 HEIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSING STRI "Pac7ket LP7.187 P07- HEIGHT, SETBACKS & ASSING ST 10 �� HEIGHT, SETBACKS &MASSING STRC= �� HEIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSING STR "Pac7ket'^9 r 7 4A v 1 HEIGHT, SETBACKS &MASSING STR,r= 1�41w ..414,1114 HEIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSING STRj Pac7ket P7.192 Akh — — — — — _ _ _ _ — 4 61'-0" 3.b — — — — — —r o — — — — — Fy iD m ALIGiN WITH FEEDER SUPPLY BUILDING MASSING SHIFT II rai 28'-6" ..-t. MASSING STEPS ACK AND DOWN ADJ. TO 3 6 WILLOVI ■ owl! �^ • ■ 123-3„ I cri ' i UTURE RIVER DISTRICT PLAZA .. (BY CITY)......... 3 -6„ T V'J E, 31 300 ■■ ■■■■■■ ■■ S■■■■ '-0'-o5 STORI 8sKA MASSING S ACD DO TO405AN DEN ,■■■ 3 ■.■-■ - ■T ■ ■ ■ ■ .. riY ■ ■ r� MASSING SHIFTS BASED ON 50' 25' ' HISTORIC DOWNTOWN 25LOT = DIMENSIQNS � O HISTORIC BUILDING SPACING RELATIONSHIP REPEATED Packet Pg. 193 Iis.i nILI�' LINDEN (__s; �9 y . LA., IT t. I�I 1!i ���IY ■ � � =t�=�z� a �llll m i 3.b Ample evidence supports the notion that for historic buildings or buildings that embody potential historic designation, such designation does not hinge on the proximity, scale, style or detailing of neighboring development. Massing and intelligent materials gestures can however, have significant influence, but may still not remove or prevent designation. Examples such as these illustrate this concept: PROVINCETOWN ART MUSEUM, MASSACHUSETTS (designed by Machado-Silvetti Architects) LOVELAND'S RIALTO THEATER AND ADDITION (designed by the [au]workshop team while with a previous firm) w LU LU IL . LU z„ LU CD CD CD ��■ IL ■■ �' a. ■I �I III ■ ® LU 1.� :. I� lilt "I was so pleased to visit the restored Rialto Theater last summer... a this is a fantastic project, done to the very highest preservation U a standards, and one for which you should be justifiably proud." 0 U --Stephanie Meeks, President of the National Trust for Historic Preservatioi On visiting the Rialto Theater Center and addition upon its completioi 0 a HEIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSING STRA PacketPg.196 M�In MENU IMMMEN tis:.e:� ru ►o n& NEXT DOOR ! food 8 drink o . low Aws ,'� �;. Lunch • Dinner t�, HappJ;Hour , LLocalBrew L, _ ■ot Y HEIGHT, SETBACK '_& MASSING • •. SCALE TRANSITION WHEN TYPE IS CONSTANT �04k ? n. 4% 7 •ft r•� h EIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSIN 3.b MELDRUM AND C SCALE TRANSI SHIFTS TION WHEN TYPE al HEIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSING STRA PacketPg.199 /J. '' yam. :• GL ,�% .•� -3'a` is �. �.;+� is , .r r J pan .: .:.•' _ r.. MAIN �UENA.ViST u,..., � hlu HEIGH TYPE TRANSITION CONSTRUCTION SETBACKS & MASSING STRAT--'^^ - 012 r p ' —� TYPE TRANSITION CONSTRUCTION I IN a � 1 1 _lbIII 71f. FIVER SPARK"ROAD, BUNA,VI1STA HEIGHT SETtBACK S & MASSING STRATA'^� 3.b ------ -----i 0 F----------- N � �D O FY � I O APRIL 2015 WORKStSSION MASSING COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FEEDER'S SUPPLY AND MILLHOUSE LOFTS e al HEIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSING STRA PacketPg.203 3.b — — — --*-- -- --4 <----------- pr El! _ of F cm III ■ I1 WWI I � � _ MR E? a �1:0:01 *. oft I I, II'I III II■�,, __ ' ... .. N ����� T11i IEEEME��IBE o, as��I���� ---- ME ONE11 ,; ..., ,�,��,� 0 CURRENT DESIGN M COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FEEDER'S SUPPLY AND MILLHOUSE LOFTS al HEIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSING STRA PacketPg.204 3.b — -i F m ill ■ -■ T....�:+^nl •. l r EI!l ' 1 ill■7 : v F ■ III I III 111 i 1 l CURRENT DESIGN COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS al LINDEN HOTEL HEIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSING STRA PacketPg.205 3.b U ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ 11 11 11 11 11 11 CURRENT DESIGN COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BLOCK ONE MIXED USE HEIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSING STRA PacketPg.206 3.b i- =rR i i i i i■ IY �� i1189 INS ' .. 'I "'i • ! I! 1• R. I- \ 11. '-. \R.,�G�F�K, 'ate RELATIONSHIP TO 405 AND 409 LINDEN SECTION THROUGH 409 LINDEN C O V Y � aJ a1 T1_ a Y V a a Q ai U c ai w c 0 U Y_ C) C u U al HEIGHT, SETBACKS & MASSING STRA PacketPg.207 11 I I , I►. Ai HEIGHT, SETBACKS & fir ,. . %.• MASSING '4 ' � ��� e� STRAT -aI. .... ii i 1u1 e i� 's 11 'Al Am a� � �� 11111 II Ih II IIII g +r Multiple massing shifts to relate to 405 and 409 Linden 3167 Ill r • mi I I�• �• y 4r No Text All areas of the project are carefully designed to reflect the River District design guidelines and to create harmony. Massing and material orientation relate to industrial shed -roof structures typical of the district. Amount of each ma is visually similar to that of its historic counterpart within the block. rgo AREA OF ADJACENCY DOMINANT MATERIAL ANALY COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 3.4.7(F) NEW CONSTRL�_ 3.b MATERIAL PALETTE MATCHES AREA OF ADJACENCY AND RIVER DISTRICT CHARACTER CORRESPONDING WITH 323 WILLOW ^! 4, CORRESPONDING WITH 405 AND 409 LINDEN CORRESPONDING WITH FEEDER SUPPLY AND GENERAL DISTRICT CHARACTER DOMINANT MATERIAL RELATIO PacketPg.213 nil i; -.mw__ Lit -- - - ■ R,,,,,,, ,,, ,.,%,,. uu j!y S q IIII�I ill�m��'�IIIhIdP�i!rllhnj�lll�l! IPIn'iEnw irk \i i IIII , Mi ,7`'lll'i'�III 11 Ln' 20�4 NHIhi II!I�uiilltlN - �: L!� Y *All dimensions are a **23mm lens shown ;.i! .�s I I I I —s._. jF "meM_MOM �� ilii jj .. 1! H E! i I t!u I IIIII � AM ME jft �=AM 171: MUF . - w Wood siding relates to 405 and 409 Linden Amount of material is similar to that of historic counterpart. p i� 6 sir .> AA lip wn -:oil,! I I, e I Local Sandstone base relates to 405/409 foundations Amount of material is similar to that of historic counterpart. I ght-colored Cement taster (Stucco) relates t Feeder Supply buildin ;i Now"". ii III j j� jj SAM !M Eo NO Al Amount of material is visually similar to Feeder Supply. NIXON I IJIM I � II II,IIII II �IIII II I IIII n r ll' III !'Il I!i"0 , — III�III =IF IIN Jr ` i� III ill �S 1I ITII III .®' I� ' .. , fiillfifiifillll ' IIIII�IIN� Iron Brick to relate to 320 Exposed structural wood Willow beam at storefront -fill IIIIII Ijilllil IIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIII111111R � r 4fiill �o r � Ir J. I�.���� I�I_' •� e- ly»I• ��, lit �r ..: .r.II.11�A.1_LI�.1:�1_�. Corrugated weathered steel to relate to Feeder's Supply _ Exposed structural woo = cornice using glulams a wood decking g Flat weathered steel *All dimensions are appror **44mm lens shown A Ili � FIN s Amount of material visuallv similar to 326. ;1 FiF.:'Kt i 11 �w-��� �IPM ■ r ifiiuurur 7 �i•F' �wilPw%%,�.iC�i�!� ,fIIII.�I_,.., �� -0000 ��r� WIN V 11 iwl La ! s� All �r 1 \ �4QW - 1►of 0,61111,41, %I 1Nam-1�4$f v ® it -+ i I A No Text Millis Ii - so ti dmb is all .. \■ILLI III \\ Ilia - III w■ aft 3.b .aoo� 0 'h �Ir7 4-in ✓,®r . c .> a` a a w w 0 U c v E t U _ a IEW FROM ABOVE FEEDER SUPPLY ARCHITECTURAL CHAR Packet Pg. 226 3.b I Poo No -mqq 117 �5.. GROUND LEVEL VIEW FROM WEST ARCHITECTURAL CHAR PacketPg.227 n `� ��m �rw ilk N k r ' _.� y P I KIII ■I�ia� T � Y'100000>00 r .. i 1 � MEN DIES s 4 Ili Idi�il>IL�'All IIII I,,� -J y ■ J■■ �f��'RRAI w No ININ WIN C _ IN I vv Rai Pik ! v. h'I� �Ih I� 1�III�II�III�6illllllll,illl ,, • i�-ANI.- 16 at Alf lip FMMW "INA "•i.:',2}'1. •. y. �i .ltPl➢i:: r•.:.iD1iRIIl^� r' �\ # Iil, L Jkl: , - �. �l jai, � •. Y ,J NI s•'a I :f. 3.b ' •�r�c�Tt �T ! p7�F• 1 4, 10, FAA Wll!1,cif (%I! t. v 1 l�, A . (;I Vti M1'�jf .:It,I f ``'FAR, , it+4 ; " A conceptual h° bronze marked �> ! might include a miniature 3D i model diagrarl •N.'� ; �. of the fort Sr11 i ' i > > depicting the i.- o� lu location of the »� ~� viewer. {{ Oi .ir ��►��'' IIIL JI _ARW� ITT Confluence straddles what was the center of the 1864 - 1866 fort. Despite not being mentioned in the LPC's area of adjacency, we would like c � to propose seeking a grant for a marker indicating the center of the parade ground:111111 Milk: d 4t. .` AAAAA �IIM No Text -- 4) No Text a No Text 3.b 4 0 1 LINDEN STREET 0 IN THE RIVER DISTRICT LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION REVIEW FOLLOW-UP PRESENTATION MAY 17, 2017 (ORIGINAL PRESENTATION WAS APRIL 22, 2015) M-ARCorkshopHs [SPACE] U N B A N O E V E L O P N E N T SAUNDERS Building Confidence" c 0 Y v a. a c 0 U El Packet Pg. 241 3.c Plan of Protection for Historic Sites Project Title: Confluence Full Property Address: 401 Linden Street, Fort Collins, Co 80524 Form Prepared by: [au]workshop, Ilc Please complete the following as applicable: 1.0 Introduction Description of project location: 401 Linden Street, Fort Collins, Co 80524 BEING A REPLAT OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 29 49 69 & 8, BLOCK 2, TOWN OF FORT COLLINS LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6T" PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO General description of work to be performed, including which firm(s) will be doing the work: Demolition of existing building on site. New construction of a mixed use development that includes 28 residential units starting at the second level, and 10,156sf of commercial office/retail space on the basement, first and second levels. General Contractor - TBD Subcontractors / Trade Contractors - TBD Building(s) or portion(s) of buildings that will be affected: Demolition of existing non -eligible building and out buildings on site. Eligible buildings on adjacent properties (320 Willow, 405 Linden, 409 Linden) will not be altered as part of the project. The 320 Willow property will receive site grading for a drainage swale with storm sewer line and area inlet to improve site drainage. Contractor shall coordinate all construction items impacting adjacent properties with the property owners prior to beginning any construction. Packet Pg. 242 3.c Is building adjacent to other buildings or structures, on or off site, and if so, how close?: See plan exhibit: 0 I o II V=4 I0 LLI LU FUTURE J PLAZA FEATURES RELOCATED,r 310 WILLOW NOT PART OF PRO 28F- n° 320 WILLOW NOT PART OF PROJECT 9 o 6" 3 M K. r - - - - LIMIT OF y BASEMENT f NEW BUILDING AREA WAY TO BASEMENT NEW BUILDING S' LIGHT AND AIR EASEMENT a 4 ry Lr 19'43 G L Fin o I Qo 8'5" 56 o I. r Ij a I I z PROJECT PROPERTY' - u LINE LINDEN STREET ROW 1001 TOTAL WIDTH FROM PROPERTY LINE TO WALL BUILDING ABOVE Are any of these other buildings or structures 50 years old or older (which ones, and what are their dates of construction, if known): 320 Willow St (built: 1899), 405 Linden St. (built: 1904), 409 Linden St. (built: 1904) 2.0 Scope of Work Describe the work, and how it will affect any historic building(s) (both the subject property and adjacent, if applicable). Provide descriptions on each of the following, as applicable: Demolition: Will include onsite demo of existing non -eligible office building, concrete block storage shed, and wood shed. w_ Lu H Z Lu a 0 Lu W O O O ti a 0 a_ Lu Z Lu J LL Z 0 O ti LO LO Packet Pg. 243 3.c Site preparation: Removal of existing building and foundation. Site grading. Excavation of new 12' basement. Excavation: No undermining of the existing adjacent buildings is anticipated. If unforeseen foundation conditions are discovered, excavation work will be stopped and will not continue until it is determined if additional shoring would be required. Additional shoring will be provided on an "as needed" basis if unforeseen existing conditions require it. Utilities: Existing utilities will be demolished and new utilities will be constructed. New foundation: The new foundation will be grade beams on drilled piers, with a limited portion as a 12' deep basement. Refer to plan exhibit above for extents of basement area. New construction: Construction is non-combustible concrete podium with wood framed construction above. Where construction occurs adjacent to existing buildings the building facades will be protected with 8-12 mil construction grade visqueen applied vertically to the building or with plywood as needed. Parking lot: NA — No open parking lot on site. 27 space parking garage is on the first level of the building with circulation along Poudre St alley plus 3 tuck under parallel spaces along Poudre St alley. Driveways/alleyways: The existing curb cut and driveway along Linden St. will be removed and replaced with curb and gutter, sidewalk and landscape paving. Two new driveways will connect the parking to Poudre St alley. No other new streets, alleys, or driveways are proposed. Landscaping: Existing street trees are in the public right-of-way and will be preserved and protected per city requirements. Other trees on site will be removed and mitigated per recommendation by city forester in their tree inventory for the site. New planting beds along the perimeter of the building, raised planters and modular paving will be part of the new construction. Drainage: Site drainage will be improved. Rainwater from the roofs will be collected and will connect to the storm sewer. New site paving also improves drainage by directing nuisance water away from the buildings. Minor site grading for a drainage swale and a new area inlet and storm sewer line is proposed for 320 Willow. This will provide improved drainage away from the building on that site. Please refer to attached drainage plan for site drainage. Other: 3.0 Coordination of Project Activities Name of person or persons responsible for overseeing the demolition and/or construction activities: :K Will they be on site when that work is occurring? Yes If not, how may they be contacted if needed when that work is underway? Contact information for the job superintendent, including phone and email, will be provided to project owners, owners representatives, and adjacent property owners. Packet Pg. 244 3.c What specific coordination practices will be used to coordinate work activities? The general contractor works with the group of subcontractors as a team. They will be coordinating every aspect of construction between the subcontractors and adjacent building owners during the entire project duration. 4.0 Deconstruction, Salvaging & Recycling Materials Which historic materials will be deconstructed and salvaged? No historic materials will be deconstructed. Which historic materials will not be salvaged, and how will they be disposed of? There is no deconstruction of historic structures as part of the project. 5.0 Protection of Existing Historic Property How will you ensure that historic buildings, structures, and surface features will not be damaged during work? What means will be used to protect them? 5.1 Site Conservation — Protection of street trees per Fort Collins specifications and installing temporary site fencing around entire construction site. Fencing will be placed between the building face and any machinery. Otherwise, machinery will be separated from the historic buildings with field built plywood barriers or equivalent to protect the buildings from potential debris if/when the contractor is working within a closer zone. Where construction occurs adjacent to existing buildings the building facades will be protected with 8-12 mil construction grade visqueen applied vertically to the building or with plywood as needed. 5.2 Demolition of Building — Will include onsite demo of existing non -eligible office building, concrete block storage shed, and wood shed. Areas adjacent to demolition work will be protected with plywood. 5.3 Foundation Stability — Currently not anticipating undermining the existing adjacent structures. Constant observation during excavation of existing buildings is anticipated. 5.4 Structural — N/A Project is new construction. Adjacent structures will not be altered. 5.5 New Construction — N/A Project is new construction. Adjacent structures will not be altered. 5.6 Historic Openings & Materials — N/A Project is new construction. Adjacent structures will not be altered. Where construction occurs adjacent to existing buildings the building facades will be protected with 8-12 mil construction grade visqueen applied vertically to the building or with plywood as needed. 5.7 New Openings — N/A Project is new construction. Adjacent structures will not be altered. 5.8 Floor Framing — N/A Project is new construction. Adjacent structures will not be altered. 5.9 Roof Structure and Roof Framing — N/A Project is new construction. Adjacent structures will not be altered. 5.10 Structural Loads — N/A Project is new construction. Adjacent structures will not be altered. 5.11 Supporting and Bracing of Existing Structure; Under -Pinning — See Above 5.3. 5.12 Excavation and Shoring of Existing Structure — See Above 5.3. 5.13 Site Cleanup — Continual project clean up around adjacent area of any construction debris that may leave site. 6.0 Documentation for Record Packet Pg. 245 3.c Does the project include measured drawings and/or photographs? Yes, Detailed construction documents will be used. All drawings will be submitted to the building department as part of the building permit process. Where will these be stored? Hard copies and digital copies will be submitted to the Building Department. Additionally, digital and hard copies of these will be stored on site in the contractor's construction office. 7.0 Archeology How will you address archeological resources if they are likely to be present or if you should unexpectedly find them? (i.e., contact the Museum of Discovery; have an archeologist on site to monitor the work; have an archeologist on call.) An archeologist will be retained to observe onsite during any demolition or construction that requires any excavation or site grading. In the event any archeological resources are encountered, the site will be preserved and we will contact the Museum of Discovery. Attachments: Site plans (DR01/DR01.1), grading plans (C400/C401), and drainage plan (C500). Packet Pg. 246 3.d LAND USE DATA • Existing Zoning: (RDR) River Downtown Redevelopment District, Transit oriented development (TOD) Overlay Zone Residential Sign Dist: Development is NOT in a Residential Sign District • Proposed Land Use: Mixed Use Commercial/Residential) • Max. Building Height Permitted: 6 Mae M19M of 5111 + 14ory per 3.10.5.E La) • Max. Building Height Proposed: 5 stories+ n esanine III • Gross site Area: 17,450 S.F. MAD AC.) • Net Site Area: 17,450 S.F.(OAD AC.) D . Estimated Rear Area: 45,763 S.F. • Moor Area Ratio: 2.62 • Public TOM 0S.F.(0 Acres) Site Coverage Area Percent Building Coverage 15,4315.F. 88% Drives and Packing 831 S.F. 5% Landscape Area and Walla (Open Space) 1,188 S.F. 2% Public R.O.W. 0 S.F. 0% Active Recreational Use 0 S.F. 0% Total 17A50 S.F. 100% Dwelling Units Quantity Studio 6 One Bedroom Apartment 8 One Bedroom Apartment with Den 2 Two Beerwm 12 Total Bedmoma = 40 Residential penalty Gross Residential Denslty:ZZ.Odua (* of un115)/Gmss Residential Acreage 201 = 77.8 Net Residential Density:)).8dua (t of prior Net Residential Accreage C 28/.36 = 22.8 Gross Residential Acreage = (Site Acreage)-(Non-ResldeMial Acreage) .3fi = .401 Net Residential Acreage = (Gross Residential Acreage) -(]end Dedicated to Other Uses LUO 3.8. 18(B)(1)) .36 = .36-0 Parking 2 Handicap Space Required (26-50 total spaces in lot = 2 required accessible space for site) 2 Handicap Spaces Provided In covered Ranking area. Parking (Residential) Required 9 Long Term Parking Stalls 24 Demand Mitigation Transit Passes for each tenant 10% -2.40 Demand MI[IgMlon Blrytle & Pedestrian Level of service A -2.40 Car Share (1 car) -5.00 Total 16 Total required! based on 16 units (of one bedroom or less) x .75 = 12 and 12 units (of two bedroom) x 1 = 12, totaling 24 Pandng(Non- Residential) Ratio GIA Required Office 1/1000 2,266 3 Refill 2/1000 6,890 14 Cafe 5/1000 1,000 5 10,156 Existing Wilding Exemption (Up to SDOOsf A 1/101 -5 Demand Mitigation - Bicycle Is Pedestrian Level of Service A -2.20 Demand Mitigation - reduction per shared Parking strategy -3 Total 12 *322(K)(2)(b) Existing Buildings Exemption: M54 on replacing existing building area Required Provided 20 30 Ncyde Parking Use Requirement %enclosed/%racks Required Endosed Rack MUM -family ResldeMMl 1 Per bedroom 60%/40% 40 24 16 General Retail 1/4,000 sf min 4 201 4 1 3 General Office 1/4,000 sf min 4 2091 4 1 3 Cafe 1/1,000sf min4 0%/100% 4 O 4 Total 52 26 26 Provided 54 22 22* '17 racked parking shown On plan Additional racks for 10 b cydes included in raised courtyard! space Shown on sheet DROI.I Site Plan Courtyard Level. S OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION By: Your Name Here, Memeber STATE OF COLORADO ) )as. COUNTY OF IIRRIMER ) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2016, by 2222, as Member of Confluence, LLC Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires: LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 1 & 2, CONFLUENCE THE NORTHWEST 106 FEET OF THE NE 112 OF THE NE 1/2 OF LOTS 2, 4, 6 AND 0, BLOCK 2, CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF ARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO AND SW 1/2 OF LOT 2, AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY 30 FEET OF SW 1/2 OF LOT 4, ALL IN BLOCK 2, CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF IARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO, EXCEPTING HOWEVER, THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY HERETOFORE CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 18, 1920 IN BOOK 399 AT PAGE 208, DAMPER COUNTY RECORDS. AND THE SW 1/2 OF THE NE 1/2 OF LOTS 2,4,6, AND 8, BLOCK 2, EXCEPT THE NW 20 FEET OF LOT 8, CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF ARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO, SHEET INDEX POP DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES SITE PLAN NOTES: Approved by the Director of Community Development and Neighborhood Services of the CRY of Port 1. THE PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE Collins, COloracb on this day of A. D., 20 FINAL PLANS. AMENDMENTS TO TH E PLANS MUST BE REVIEWED AND Director of Community Development and Neighborhood Services VICINITY MAP Sheet Number Sheet Name NOf PAR1 C£PRNELT DROIL SITE PLAN DRO1.1 SITE PLAN - COURTYARD DR02 ARCHITEQTURAL ELEVATIONS D0 ARCSEMOURIAL ELEVATIONS OR04 SECTION ELEVATIONS DR05 LANDSCAPE PLAN DRO6 SHADOW STUDIES DROT SHADOW STUDIES a sOp OROB 3D VIEWS DR09 MATERIALS° DR10 FLOOR PLANS ma_ DRII FLOOR PLANS DR12 FLOOR PLANS DR13 FLOOR PLANS O O a W PRONSEDFUTURE a STREET TREE U 3 PROP0.5ED FUTURE STREETLIGHT OPROPOSED FUTURE ON l�jy STR&T PARKING �J FUNRE PARKWAY PUNnNGRREER RELOCATED UTITY ___4 I ESANO VNULTs RN SUCCULENTS �I FUTURE au P II J PERU RELOCATED NEW PI ENG RBOCATB) HYDRANT SITE PLAN I-- 2U' 0' 4 330 WILLOW NOr PART OF PNOIELT BIKE PARKING PACKS (2) ARWAY i0 845EMEM Y WOPY ENCROACHMENT ABOVE B' 0 o BIKE PAS ING KS (SO) pgC (10) Y RY WINDOW ENCROMMMEMABGVE 9' T wcow ENCROACHMENT i0i ryl J illll_ b i0i 9 in; A a i a As i0i TORRUt � 1 I :a is 31 OR b b Me D 6 6e - _e TRAIN ADD REGIME Sir m SLIGM AND MR FISEMENT� R SUNG BIKE RPLK ROTENI LOCATION MR B) BUCK PAVERS EgSTNGSTREa MOTORCYCLE NTURE PART KE OF STREET PROPOSED NEW TREE ANOTREE GMTE .PARKING PROJECT C+ DUE RULEEANO PROJECT TREE GRATE LINDEN STREET ROW 1OO1 ; NWW COUNT PLANTING ARM \ \ .1 PROJECT PROPERTY LINE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS. 2. REFER TO FINAL UTILITY PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION FOR STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITY MAINS AND SERVICES, PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHY, STREET IT IMPROVEMENTS. 3. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT AND UTILITY PLANS FOR EXALT LOCATIONS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EASEMENTS, LOTS, TRACTS, STREETS, WALKS AND OTHER SURVEY INFORMATION. 4. ALL ROOFTOP AND GROUN D MOUNTED M ECHANICAL EQUIPM ENT MUST BE SCREENED MOM VIEW FROM ADIACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS. IN CASES WHERE BUILDING PARAPETS DO NOTACCOMPLISH SUFFICIENT SCREENING, THEN FREE-STANDING SCREEN WALLS MATCHING THE PREDOMINANT COLOR OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED. OTHER MINOR EQUIPMENT SUCH AS CONDUIT, METERS AND PLUMBING VENTS SHALL BE SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH SURROUNDING BUILDING SURFACES. 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED IN ONE PHASE UNLESS A PHASING PLAN IS SHOWN WITH THESE PLANS. 6. [IF APPLICABLE - INCLUDE LANGUAGE FOR ANY MODIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS APPROVED WITH PDP ODP . 2. N/A 8. N/A 9. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROVIDED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOOT-CANDLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 3.2.4 OF THE LAND USE CODE AND SHALL USE A CONCEALED, FULLY SHIELDED LIGHT SOURCE WITH SHARP CUT-OFF CAPABILITY SO AS TO MINIMIZE UP -LIGHT, SPILL UG ITT, IA GRE AND UNNECESSARY DIFFUSION. 10. SIGNAGE AND ADDRESSING ARE NOT PERMITTED WITH THIS PLANNING DOCUMENT AND MUST BE APPROVED BY SEPARATE CITY PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SIGNS MUST COMPLYWITH CITY SIGN CODE UNLESS A SPECIFIC VARIANCE 15 GRANTED BY THE CITY. 11. FIRE HYDRANTS MUST MEET OR EXCEED POUDRE FIRE AUTHORITY STANDARDS. ALL BUILDINGS MUST PROVIDE AN APPROVED FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM. 0 is 12. ALL BIKE RACKS PROVIDED MUST BE PERMANENTLY ANCHORED. e ME HMBI as VAULT WRIID 13. ALL SIDEWALKS AND RAMPS MUST CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS. UNDBIPARKING ACCESSIBLE RAMPSMUST PROVIDED AT ALL STREET AND DRIVE UB E' INTERSECTIONS AND AT ALL DESIGNATED ACCESSABLE PARKING SPACES. ACCESSABLE PARKING SPACES MUST SLOPE NO MORE THAN 1:48IN ANY DIRECTION. ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MUST SLOPE NO MORE THAN 1 20 - IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND WITH NO MORE THAN 1:90 C0.0ss SLOPE. TOTAL TOM - PROPERTY ONE TO WALL COMMON S AREASAN LAIN THIN MEDIANS,PEN CIRCLES DJACENTPING WA ICD OCOM COMMON WAYS, STREET MEDIANS, AND TRAFFIC CIRCLES ADJACENT TO COMMON AN OPEN SPACEAREASARE REQUIRED BE MAINTAINED BY TT THE PROPERTY ON 15 OWNERS'ASSOCIATION. R FOR STREET RESPONSIBLE FOR SNOW REMOVAL ON ALL AD]ACENT STREET SIDEWALKS RESPONSIBLE ALL ADJACENTS D < AND SIDEWALKS IN COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS. BUILDING < ARGUE AND, IF APPLICABLE: 15. THE PROPERTY OWNER FOR EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT IS a NEE PARKING RESPONSIBLE FOR SNOW REMOVAL ON ALL STREET SIDEWALKS ADJACENT AACNS (E) TO EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT. 16. PRIVATE CONDITIONS,COVENANTS, AND RESTRICTIONS(CC&R'S), OR ANY OTHER PRIVATE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT IMPOSED ON U LANDOWNERS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT, MAY NOT BE CREATED OR ENFORCED HAVING THE EFFECT OF PROHIBITING OR U IFFING THE INSTALLATION OF XERISCAPE LANDSCAPING, SOLAR/PHOTO-VOLTAIC O COLLECTORS (IF MOUNTED FLUSH UPON ANY ESTABLISHED ROOF UN E), N CLOTHES LINES (IF LOCATED IN BACK YARDS), ODOR CONTROLLED COMPOST BINS, OR WHICH HAVE THE EFFECT OF REQUIRING THAT 3 PORTION OF ANY INDIVIDUAL LOT BE PLANTED IN TURF CRASS. 0 12. ANY DAMAGED CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK EXISTING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AS WELL AS STREETS, SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND F GUTTERS, DESTROYED, DAMAGED OR REMOVED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION LAR OF THIS PROJECT, SHALL BE REPLACED OR RESTORED TO CITY OF FORT Ry COLLINS STANDARDS AT THE DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE PRIOR TO THE a ACCEPTANCE OF COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS AND OR PRIOR TO THE L- ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPAN)C W18. HIElANE_MARKINGIRE 1 NE MARKING: MARKING: AFIRE LANE MARKING PLAN MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE OFFICIAL PRIOR TO THE a �. ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. WHERE REQUIRED BY THE FIRE CODE OFFICIAL, APPROVED SIGNS OR OTHER APPROVED NOTICES THAT INCLUDE THE WORDS NO PARKING HIRE LANE SHALL BE O PROVIDED FOR HIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS TO IDENTIFY SUCH a -- ROADS OR PROHIBIT THE OBSTRUCTION THEREOF. THE MEANS BY WHICH FIRE LANES ARE DESIGNATED SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CLEAN AND LEGIBLE CONDITION ATALLTIMES AD BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED WHEN - NECESSARYTO PROVIDE ADEQUATE VISIBILITY. 19. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION: AN ADDRESSING PLAN IS REQUIRED TO -- --- BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY AND POUDRE HIRE AUTHORITY '- PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. UNLESS - THE PRIVATE DRIVE IS NAMED, MONUMENT SEEPAGE MAYBE REQUIRED TO ALLOW WAY FINDING. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL HAVE ADDRESS NUMBERS, BUILDING NUMBERS OR APPROVED BUILDING IDENTIFICATION PLACED IN A POSITION THAT IS PLAINLY LEGIBLE, VISIBLE FROM THE STREET OR ROAD FRONTING THE PROPERTY, AND POSTED WITH A ' MINIMUM OF SIX-INCH NUMERALS ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND. WHERE ODA ROADTHE BUIPOLE ING CCESSBE PUBLICPRIVATE CANNOT BE VIEWED FROM THE PUBLIC WAY, A MONUMENT, POLE CANNOT VIE ED FROM NUM OTHER SIGN 00. MEANS SHALL BE USED TO IDENTIFY THE STRIICNR E. 1 ��. Ai eNT i, T O O O T a 0 a W U Z LU 7 J LL Z O U am l/ � Ln Lr) v FM LL Li I� VI M-. a orksho m Fort Collins, T 405 Linden sL CO, ALI J�9305220 w a Snap m y A 201706 U O N aQ•�•� a) Z z MiO i wallO J LL Z U o ,,fE�C� ^ 0 a V N 0alias V/ V Project #: W 1417 Lima Issue date: 19 April 2017 0 I.UI. SITE PLAN 41 DR01 t U cc ANO ANO Packet Pg. 247 3.d 0 A 5 1 4 3 TREE GRAILS':, T Randall Urban kvildwries Q Motlel: OF Titl it 5'sq, (4 pi Q MaRNeI: CIA Dudile lmn r Finish : Raw ONE For ORNAMENTAL OR DECIDUOUS SHADE TREE I, a F2me: SfnMak B'Fmmq meAlI'm duty N"t vehkular) RE: LANDSCAPE PLANS Q PROVIDE I/2" DIA. WHITE PVC AROUND WIRE Supplier Rcreatlon Plm, U4. 3" MAX OF WIRE MAY BE EXPOSED AT EACH END ^ LL 152W W, ElbwpM Dn TRUNK FLARE (LOCATED AT TOP OF FOOTBALL) U Colden, CDBWUS SHALL BE HELD 3" DOWN FROM TOP SURFACE'I 1,1 is 303.218.1455 OF TREE GRATE, TOR w [reaflonplus.Com MMIMPRIK ellbnPlus.wm TREE GRATE. INSTALL PER GRATE TO Si MANUFACRIRER'S RECOM MEN DATED NS, WEREFER �J LAYOUT PLANS FOR ROOT BAULfTOP OF SOIL AND BOTTOM OF TREE LOCATION OF TREE GRATES GRATE WITH 3/8" PER GRAVEL PLACED OVER W WEED BARRIER FABRIC ALIGN ALIGN EMBED EYE BOLT IN CONE, PROVIDE 2" CLEAR LL BELWEEN EYE BOLT AND EDGE OF COUPON TOP. : J Z 310 WILLOW NOT PART CF PULLET Il p 11 � VERIIGL®NE PARKNG RACK(2) CAST TREE GRATE FRAME INTO CC�CRIL�CURBAND GUTTER CONIC PER MANUFACTURERE'S �Il� RECCOMENDATIONS TREE GRATE - SECTION � I I UNDER STAIR BIKE PARKING RICK (2) IIIIIIIIIIIIII� IAI� "� I EE����h I IIII�J • _: I ® UNDER SEER BIKE -- Irl PARKI NS WE (2) L32MOTWOIL RUP ORNERY HE Ne 1,1111 Y III I ' — i • a� • _'I__I_IIIIII__ I"'-i �r�l1i91111111 .. �IIIIT:1 11 II. f�l '�d ;'1 Lii�l1 WILYWINDOWTEARODY ENCROACHMENT ENCROACHMENT ABOVE 9' ARWEV SITE PLAN COURTYARD LEVEL I" - III T4 LINDEN STREET ROW 100', PRODUCT \PE\ LINE 2 UNDER III BIKE PARKING MOK(2) UNDER STAIR HIKE PARKING RICK (2) 1 O IU!\ V/ La/ L'I yr C'I LL Q Cn Mlliy2rkshop 4) 405 Linden SL Ron Colling, GO, IUPI Tv-J70.430.5220 ww..a I¢hol y C 2017LLI 06 IU DIN- C O N fQe V/ CI W Z El _ B J O LL J Z U a V ,,�^^ C7 U) 0 cn m project #: Q% 1417 ISSUE date: 19 April 2017 O U SUE PLAN - COURTYARD DR01e1 t V All All Packet Pg. 248 3.d raer--,-.•a1 I• �I --- -, Inn Yavvvawrl s F i.j __________ —ST-i �- • • _ .Na a a a a a a a m a 1 ]70 WIlldN 3TFEETY I ^4•N All me a I II I.Maaa'.a-/--- t 144tC14, lN• / • _' 6 !r� - ;M I�r .• t On r4 wYow, V.AN AN - r — I - •scAN 11WO -J /-� AAA WO On III 6�w An w�• GINNIE= Re,w,w r•reinI OUlA .srj anrrncCnmr; mamm s rijlr,FaTnGE rJ «rrie otinom?1 r v k• i �� I •atYnEnarREE* I � a•l LYOEN i !. Ri0/OSF9GIIUa1G Ir •.aescYrrlA&I4J, .plan ••�.rl@ . W.. . I u•Y•www Ica•.°.u" I - r�vY•oouON �Erevm' ` �a 1� 9� 9i`CI400R -�' !%9.a C • �- ..caw Yru a•wr �MaS aOr utr.Y -. {-NOGp10ORo �t'b NpTRO ti - obi iw s eJl• w+ n - a.- �cwe •,v r.r..m. nn,,lpLe �r< NQTE$ mmo•o .9 at•ao rwc w -r•a Y�.s ..•. a .Yrw.�vrc m Yc •o NaY.o al,aKb• 1wa w OOsal v cu I AN OAat• R1 Vf--.-. ,caw \C M f/m%mA, Y ,w�^ Iry W be,w l no.N_ NY T NMV %l is Y •i,.R INw. YrV, m t WP`anly�ye�y� mu a C ,IM 1w Ir••W Wrnisr,�tud� w8. wl� �i•a/a'� �Y-ald �i..iHY- Y pnml ALL C YI? tw cal 0 dal! • .vla.rrs a,.� vaw•a .. aeue,.w au.evn Ywlt• ...••.aM L w4M f. l� •, a11NP NI twOCY .Y.Ya • A Y tvn al re aaor.n u•a u a -4a w .ANI'.-AM caw rMrC� V.L,N W AMP n,a•e!L 1rYt[.q ~OJ.I w a a.J[ Srl N MI • w .•enrcva• wY• r•• e•RrorYram o Al erewa wYwa ao •m> r. w..4ss ••au. aaca r... .. •on YW. w aeYIRU NO NOR me MMYM •• Va a 6WIFf •Wlrr Nwb•u Sa—J:19, $ aiVu NIs? . LAL m a- va-•n.Y .,... a No, •oan .�a...JY ,l ,w uw.S yr N rmm w Yr I ft 190V NM Ulnlhi lG-N+P,YY o a9ewa ONr ,a.�va orarr..,,o.u.lot, u R• w .1 C>•SCIOa R M OOMWR AMC wpyay yqYl lw. r.Y. 1 b06Wb.T 1a .Y',+RM/. O4Y3 R[tllrRtb YRY. calla Y. a wO1 caw . ,M R M WYN .e MYo a'JV. uY Yr+Yra ry ,aaJn w. r. on+,m oan•Y Px cal a aPa, lYaaJR •wore ray.. u.: n-.-n ,ali 1,t SGN, YY .t y r9 YAll, VYInn YYYV VV \ rJVVII•\\ � •ana TITY9999b O• 0000000 OOOO .—m- YYrv.vrvvvvvr rrvv �•--�`� „P TOP♦000vvo %nAAmmA YYIYYYYYeV •�'•� OYYYY YbbY • Iu,Y,I, �• 1v09909YOv �vTi•,IAMr•/1Y 00 , rvvvavvvvv avvv • - -- vevrYvvvvtivv vvv♦ -- - rveavvvsvvvvv avvvI SOON _oo \ : tCAVm of fort Co11/A Colomdo - Yaw - - - a a, �` I S1Tld'fY Yi.AN APPROVAL vovvavavv Tbtl 99 VYYYVVbtl Vb V9999999990,0909 N•wJ rYY Ytl SSYv<1•YYYY fir• -•� �r Not otl u19EN sllEEt tl • Y V� l•.. . = a a AN a All, a Y a a a a NO, at, AN - 1 •--M1rT•T air ++Fo —�Ei— an e. Inn C o V/ O TNN�, a y��wl a S W U rr Lu z . i J LL z O U z� ti Z Lf) La Ln = yr Q::L L LL. LQL a c M MI C a�S .j No a ,,1L^� N = V 0 D W U N U) W z W LL U z a = L) Z 3 Z � OQ O U V W E C400 RR Q Packet Pg. 249 3.d soar ELEVATIONS AT of. .. L LLw.I. a+I.- .NA •+•... NUN N .L. Lvw.vL .w ..AN. L _ti...I . 119 o 1,.v. y.L M .,MAIN.. La. I ..e.N,. a Ao ,W MILK o.. , AI.i u Y� I.v )IL S lOQil., TI Aw i.60E vs riPNJI 1CAEI i 11IIV rlr y AYn%V.i L• i aMI+¢IMP a... .+. x 1aM�sL/[S01 Y .•.M T .iA..nL <{rs V ooi :.N.�) o : `a,N''�uILM .: • U''•: �.'N.-..¢ mtsa)Vywnm • .. •w. r n e.. +mr .sss I. �s mesa.vns c r s.I.o . n •s. w x e•. M•oe wr mcx� v. das OF, s R ....nrm.ti ar a .YIW..R.P n � •aOl eHae m •Ia. • Y ANV.I➢ v.KVA�'R.L .� � IHC Y.-T . m 'i T .q .�NUA n T 111 n A� w MY..Ao m ...N. . atllflVLYI Y.I Y••YYY n ' !.'•R O MMv- WL• tlLL rCfIPV. uL u.�cuia . V � Y � 1.b4 LO >• JM �. YM.Y1• Y.J.t Yi .vq� L� WVS T H.IN W H K � 1. xWl N6A HRVI JOIN ...A.Y>OLYY.A R,. Y. W1.49.(PSR FL..'Y, ..V. R L moi m.TM)XAN OILY .OWfIX'S FIRM fvTP[ 4f S Lf11 NIT hL VZ OL YS miff Fllr � WIN e O fNLf r +- �: fi s)r.Mlew sl.� a kv MAN N.�. n�{Y.A [ A�IW HMII W.V.Y I N.V � _ � • ad a - Ie,..•awM.•..•.Lnlo. / ..... oplIfti • j t • .. • . 0 Fe ..... . IF... 1 . ♦ 110- . C'.'.^.'Y31-- ' ..,a .�.� � ��A..L.N.:.. —NMI...... mommill, MEMO _ Kin .ro nlc ScF HiEET CAML r % v+_ j MINN L :Foe%" ' r — + 1 1 I 1 I�IN 1 N � � •>commor;p �. r [ I IpOP06E'OBuIrYMG .l['x /LM[i[!r[E c)11P/V, uwvN[CK wM OA4A[l[ ..51 [LiJ[M 4LJan•.� b.i 3n1:I�. [ I i IN •_=, 1 'A 410INNA, NYn ev /•JI • 1 1 �N � r 40 LOMN STREET It LEGEND 1.'.'i VA1 e.AP ••a+n Las.H.•wtAA L MONO 0~1 py ! IN. OWN) I� LlLrY.A.r.HNH[ )"TIN, 0"ll ..Y..: II.LM1p Y INNOMNO N roproll: i[a ` ,ti � �� _. N. ..Y, 1.• ruNm. WL .ION v: �Wu4 =m ii CItY 'f ►ert L'oill[Y, C.1HroAe4- UTILITY PLAN APPM)%FAL 1.Nrw Ny#IV Now ly o.n.o 41Y. wd.�m .rtlul .11. OICCVGO !T �116 indew. - 64 ' 0 ti Tom 0 � a E (� LLI u- U Z Lu �-- LL i, z O U z� ti cd_ UJ W LC) = yr FM 7 LL ZW Q Cn a 1_ a a. I: br 06 01 LL C Q as N = V O 'W W z V/ L) .. [ w Z N � V U. a c o 3 2 ,. O U C O C401 u afaIINNIF Packet Pg. 250 3.d i . nu :;III �ds,uEr AA 1 1 Na'Z rnoeT . �( w.nwon \ — AM a, � _ — — _ — _ — _ _ ., raa wBl rnv BiNEeI I NOEN WWI .....r+. I�\ .. .... ww w, ,—{ N ' tlA9H � WAiBi pyLlfYlflEATtKH, PPWIOfpWPRONSED 5AN0 RtEP ',_ ' qS I m NPi+xu>F NEP�rII l I f 1 .4 r�.NM1^r I JIN LINDEN SMEV j 1 V KOW _I A. 1 INA am 1. ram LEGEND Em. .._, nnV. RAW �AAM .Yvu qw NM w2eio Its _rt IHIW.W ]clfV 6Nryi40ft Glry w.0 NOW �rPy Yw•r.W .._ M.WI. CYY /UM.A NOTES. uw/7.c.A.c.s,�c�a.�a1PM crl�u c/WM. m� Y� vY V4 Callmmrelau aq. City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL WLU'Day IoIglvetIr o BY: ED By Y EB By. EB BHA EB BM /f"fTTTT I TAM 0 0 ti a { a g Lu ►r z Lu M J LL L Z O\ Z � .1�w cdZ Y! LLI Q Ln = u v cz: FEE LL zW a 0 N a 1• ¢�( L ` L 06 Cu L N Z O J +W a z w w Q z N � 7 r. Q) SNeel E C500 of 10 }�i Q Packet Pg, 251 3.e COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY Cultural Resource Re -Evaluation Form (page 1 of 2) 1. Resource Number: 5LR462.18 3. Attachments (check as many as apply) X Photographs Site sketch map U.S.G.S. map photocopy Other Other 2. Temp. Resource Number: 4. Official determination (OAHP USE ONLY) Determined Eligible Determined Not Eligible Need Data Nominated Listed Contributing to N.R. District Not Contributing to N.R. Dist 5. Resource Name: Poudre Valley Elevator Co. / Farmers Elevator & Produce Co. 359 Linden St., Fort Collins, CO 80524 6. Purpose of this current site visit (check as many as apply) X Site is within a current project area Resurvey Update of previous site form(s) Surface collection Testing to determine eligibility Excavation Other [0L'1CI'JiC[1111 Rev. 9/98 Describe: The resource was visited in May 2010 and January 2011 to assess and re-evaluate its historic features, integrity and significance in light of proposed streetscape improvements planned for Linden Street, including the nearby intersection of Linden St. and Willow St. Plans for Linden Street are limited to improvements to the street, curbing and sidewalks, including the intersection at Linden and Willow. No work will extend beyond the public right-of-way into the adjacent properties, and no takings are planned. Consequently, the Area of Potential Effect (APE) for this project was limited to those properties that front onto Linden St., including this property. This re-evaluation was completed for the Linden Street Enhancement Project (CDOT Project #STE M455-093) that is being planned by the City of Fort Collins, in consultation with the Colorado Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. 7. Previous Recording: The property at 359 Linden St. was previously recorded in 1996, when a historic building inventory form (OAHP1403) was completed by Jason Marmor of Retrospect as part of the Central Business District Historic Property Inventory. The inventory form provided substantial, in- depth information about the property. According to this study, the property was eligible for W W o_ z W M a O J W W TOM 0 0 0 ti TOM 0 a v W U z W J W z O U rn ti L0 L0 Packet Pg. 252 3.e individual NRHP designation under Criterion A in the area of agriculture, with a period of significance from approximately 1911 to 1940. Resource Number: 5LR462.18 Temporary Resource Number: W W Cultural Resource Re -Evaluation Form z W (page 2 of 2) a O J W 8. Changes or Additions to Previous Descriptions: None w 9. Changes in Condition: None TOM 0 0 0 10. Changes to Location or Size Information: None a 0 a 11. Changes in Ownership: None w U 12. Other Changes, Additions, or Observations: None W D J LL 13. National Register Eligibility Assessment: Z Eligible X Not eligible Need data v 0 ti LO Explain: The building at 359 Linden St, has experienced no substantial changes during the past LO fifteen years since it was last recorded, and has retained its architectural integrity. It remains E eligible for individual NRHP designation under Criteron A for its association with area agriculture and Criterion C for its early 20t" century industrial architectural style. The building also continues to contribute to the existing NRHP Old Town Fort Collins Historic District, 14. Management Recommendations: This prominent building should be elevated to a higher level of recognition through individual listing in the NRHP. In addition, as an iconic historic agricultural building in downtown Fort Collins, all efforts should be made in the future to ensure its survival as a representative of the city's history as an agricultural market center. 15. Photograph Types and Numbers: Digital Photos, #1-8 16. Artifact and Field Documentation Storage Location: Not Applicable 17 we 20 Report Title: Cultural Resource Analysis, Linden Street Enhancement Project Recorder(s): Ron Sladek, President 19. Date(s): Recorder Affiliation: Tatanka Historical Associates Inc. 612 S. College Ave., Suite 21 P.O. Box 1909 9 February 2011 Packet Pg. 253 3.e Fort Collins, CO 80522 Site Plan .• o O sx O N 5x .,ra G� Packet Pg. 254 3.e Resource Photographs pp t No. Colorado F YY eedero $ 0 FM View of the building at 359 Linden St. View to the Northwest. W W Z W m a O W W TOM r 0 O O ti TOM 0 a_ W 0 Z W D J LL Z O tU rn ti U) LO Packet Pg. 255 ..Fort Coltiens 3.f Planning, Development S Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 Request for Historic Review of Landmark Eligibility and/or Effect of Proposed Demolition or Alteration Property Address: 405 Linden Street, Fort Collins, Co 80524 Specific building(s) under review: Single family home converted into commercial office space, concrete block shed, wooden shed. Applicant: Space Foundry LLC, Jason Kersley Phone: 970-430-5220 Email: Ikersley(ci)_auworkshop.co Detailed description of proposed work: No proposed changes —determination of eligibility only. CERTIFICATION I certify the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge, consent, and authority of the owners of the real property, as those terms are defined in Section 1-2 of the City Code (including common areas legally connected to or associated with the property which is the subject of this application). Pursuant to said authority, I hereby permit City officials to enter upon the property for the purpose of exterior inspection, photographs, and if necessary, for posting of publig "ice on the property. 'Owner/Applicant signature (required): Date: 23 March 2017 z Landmark Significance Criteria: O U A: A property that is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our a� local, state or national history; LO B: A property that is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; `r' .. C: A property that embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; is the work of a master; possesses high artistic value; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components N may lack individual distinction; I D: A property that has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Aspects of Integrity Criteria: J 0 Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred. yl Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan space, structure, and style of a property. = Setting is the physical environment of a historic property. Whereas location refers to the specific place where a u property was built or an event occurred, setting refers to the character of the place. It involves how, not just where, the property is situated and its relationship to the surrounding features and open space. 3 Materials are the physical elements that form a historic property. Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. It is the evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering a building, structure, or w site. O Feeling is a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period or time. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property's historic character. Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property. A property retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. Q Packet Pg. 256 3.f (For Office Use Only) Date Materials Received: Yes No Information ❑ Property is 50 years or older? Source/Date of Construction: ❑ Property is on the State or National Register or is within a State or National Historic District? Site Number: District: Yes No Director of CDNS ❑ ❑ More than one aspect of integrity is being affected? (If yes, it is a major alteration; if no, minor) Design Workmanship Materials Setting Location Association Feeling L� ❑ Property has significance and is eligible for individual Landmark designation? Comments: 1 ❑ Property retains a preponderance of architectural integrity? Comments: ❑ ❑ Proposed plans would uphold the property's significance, integrity and eligibility? CDNS Director's Signature: Date: 3z 3 Yes No LPC Chair ❑ ❑ More than one aspect of integrity is being affected? (If yes, it is a major alteration; if no, minor) Design Workmanship Materials Setting Location Association Feeling ❑ Property has significance and is eligible for individual Landmark designation? Comments: ❑ Property retains a preponderance of architectural integrity? Comments: On a 10M 0i u LPC Chair's Signature: Date: a /? Packet Pg. 257 Fort Collins 3.g Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 (Non -Binding) Request for Historic Review of Landmark Eligibility and/or Effect of Proposed Demolition or Alteration Property Address:_409 Linden Street, Fort Collins, Co 80524 Date submittals received: 23 March 2017 Specific building(s) under review: Single Family Home Applicant: Space Foundry LLC , Jason Kersley Phone: 970-430-5220 Email: ik� ersley@auworkshop.co Detailed description of proposed work: No proposed changes —determination of eligibility only. CERTIFICATION I certify the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge, consent, and authority of the owners of the real property, as those terms are defined in Section 1-2 of the City Code (including common areas legally connected to or associated with the property which is the subject of this application). Pursuant to said authority, I hereby permit City officials to enter upon the property for the purpose of exterior inspection, photographs, and if necessary, for posting of pyblip Aetice on the property. 'Owner/Applicant signature (required): Landmark Significance Criteria: Date: 23 March 2017 A: A property that is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattems of our local, state or national history; B: A property that is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; C: A property that embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; is the work of a master; possesses high artistic value; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; D: A property that has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Aspects of Integrity Criteria: Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred. Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan space, structure, and style of a property. Setting is the physical environment of a historic property. Whereas location refers to the specific place where a property was built or an event occurred, setting refers to the character of the place. It involves how, not just where, the property is situated and its relationship to the surrounding features and open space. Materials are the physical elements that form a historic property. Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. It is the evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering a building, structure, or site. Feeling is a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period or time. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property's historic character. Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property. A property retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. Packet Pg. 258 3.g (For Office Use Only) Yes No Information g❑ Property is 50 years or older? Source/Date of Construction: ❑ Property is on the State or National Register or is within a State or National Historic District? Site Number: District: Yes No Director of CDNS ❑ ❑ More than one aspect of integrity is being affected? (If yes, it is a major alteration; if no, minor) ,�/ Design Workmanship Materials Setting Location Association Feeling LJ ❑ Property has significance and is eligible for individual Landmark designation? Comments: ❑ Property retains a preponderance of architectural integrity? Comments: ❑ ❑ Proposed plans would uphold the property's significance, integrity and eligibility? Comments: CDNS Director's Signature: Yes No LPC Chair Date: I L4?J2%i ❑ ❑ More than one aspect of integrity is being affected? (If yes, it is a major alteration; if no, minor) f Design Workmanship Materials Setting Location Association Feeling I ❑ Property has significance and is eligible for individual Landmark designation? Comments: ❑ Property retains a preponderance of architectural integrity? Comments: ❑ ❑ Pi1ciposed plans would � uphold the property's significance, integrity and eligibility? Comments: liY1 AVousx a"c v" ko%, i M u4 ?Orc,, 1 '6 6t in+aLc fi Woo h a (+ u5rtyN 0 L k C — S to 0-*- 2 f` c,c Gt,•�d s d Fe, i .2d i r- , LPC Chair's Signature: I! V I Date: 7 Packet Pg. 259 �of tCoUnins 3.h Planning, Development & Transportation Se Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 (Non -Binding) Request for Historic Review of Landmark Eligibility and/or Effect of Proposed Demolition or Alteration f, Property Address: D LIJI [&0J Date submittals received: Specific building(s) under review: Applicant: r ' Phone: Email: CERTIFICATION I certify the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge, consent, and authority of the owners of the real property, as those terms are defined in Section 1-2 of the City Code (including common areas legally connected to or associated with the property which is the subject of this application). Pursuant to said authority, I hereby permit City officials to enter upon the property for the purpose of exterior inspection, photographs, and if necessary, for posting of public notice on the property. *Owner/Applicant signature (required): Date: Z Landmark Significance Criteria: o� A: A property that is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our too LO local, state or national history; TOM co B: A property that is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; o N t C: A property that embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; is the work L of a master; possesses high artistic value; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; 31 m D: A property that has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Q: Aspects of Integrity Criteria. Z Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred. W I Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan space, structure, and style of a property. o Setting is the physical environment of a historic property. Whereas location refers to the specific place where a property was built or an event occurred, setting refers to the character of the place. It involves how, not just where, M the property is situated and its relationship to the surrounding features and open space. M. Materials are the physical elements that form a historic property. E Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. It is the evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering a building, structure, or Q site. Feeling is a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period or time. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property's historic character. Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property. A property retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. Packet Pg. 260 3.h (For Office Use Only) Yes No Information ❑ ❑ Property is 50 years or older? Source/Date of Construction: ❑ ❑ Property is on the State or National Register or is within a State or National Historic District? Site Number: District: Yes No Director of CDNS ❑ ❑ More than one aspect of integrity is being affected? (If yes, it is a major alteration; if no, minor) Design Workmanship Materials Setting Location Association Feeling ❑ Property has significance and is eligible for individual Landmark designation? Comments: ❑ Property retains a preponderance of architectural integrity? Comments: ❑ ❑ Proposed plans would uphold the property's significance, integrity and eligibility? Comments: i CDNS Director's Signature: Yes No LPC Chair Date: 3 ❑ ❑ More than one aspect of integrity is being affected? (If yes, it is a major alteration; if no, minor) Design Workmanship Materials Setting Location Association Feeling ❑ Property has significance and is eligible for individual Landmark designation? Comments: UNUt CZk1E1UAL&3 A n _ �-c WE Al Au EAr& VWC A)*03 VYJODM IL 17%1 _JW 71 LfLA CS ST\ l7 f A LCa tTF C_rt'� ❑ Property retains a preponderance of architectural integrity? Comments: ❑ ❑ Proposed plans would uphold the property's significance, integrity and eligibility? Comments: LPC Chair's Signature: Date: 3 Packet Pg. 261 No Text 326 Willow Street 5LR1562 3.i II. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 9. P.M.: 6th Township: Architectural Inventory Form SE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of SW 10. UTM reference zone: Easting: USGS quad name: Year: 11. Lot(s) Addition: 13 493850 Page 2 of 8 7N Range: 69W 1/4 of NW 1/4 of Section Northing: Fort Collins, Colorado 1960 (Photorevised 1984) 4,6 Fort Collins 12. Boundary description and justification: Scale: Block: Year of addition: 12 4493100 7.5 2 1873 (Resource number) The site boundary is a rectangular line drawn encompassing the house and associated outbuildings, and excluding the adjacent commercial property at 316 Willow Street. This boundary reflects the historic use of the property. Metes and bounds exist: III. ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION 13. Building plan (footprint, shape): Rectangular Plan 14. Other building plan descriptions: 15. Dimensions in feet (length x width): 16. Number of stories: 1 17. Primary external wall material(s): brick 18. Roof configuration: flat roof Other roof configurations: 19. Primary external roof material: composition roof Other roof materials: 20. Special features: chimney false front 21 26-Mar-02 porch General architectural description: Other wall materials: This historic property consists of a small brick commercial building that was later used as a dwelling. It is a small, single story, rectangular plan structure with a flat parapet on the fagade, and stepped side walls. The flat -roofed building rests on a stone foundation, and its walls are constructed of non -pressed red bricks set in common bond (7 stretcher courses followed by one header course). The parapet has a corbelled comice, and galvanized sheet metal flashing covers the top of the parapet. A wide, open front porch is affixed to the fagade, and consists of a half -hipped roof (clad with asphalt shingles) supported by 4x4" wood posts. A closed rail of painted beadboard spans the posts, except for the central opening. The porch floor is made of boards and is not elevated. The facade is symmetrically arranged, and features a centrally -placed entry flanked by identical, 1/1 light, double -hung wood sash windows set above buff -colored sandstone lugsills. The main entry is equipped with an old, painted wood door containing two small lights, and is covered by a modern, dark brown burnished metal storm door. The front windows have also been equipped with modem aluminum frame storm windows. A large, modem swamp cooler is affixed to the window opening to the left of the main entry. Stucco has been applied to the portion of the fagade within the front porch, surrounding Old Fort Site Cultural Survey Project Balloffet-Entranco . 345 E. Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 ' (970) 221-3600 TOM 0 0 NI E L 0 U. N m ca NI 0 0 N M c 0 E U fa Q Packet Pg. 263 326 Willow Street 5LRI562 3.i Architectural Inventory Form Page 3 of 8 the main entry and front windows. (Resource number) The right side, or southeast elevation, lacks entries, but is fenestrated with three identical 1/1 light, double -hung windows with arched lintels, each composed of two courses of brick headers. All three windows are equipped with tan sandstone lugsills. The central window on this elevation is set into an area of dissimilar brickwork, suggesting that a large hole was made (window replaced?) and later repaired with new, red bricks. A partial buttress of brick extends down from the parapet near the rear end of the building. A basement entry stairwell is located adjacent to the southeast wall, with a sloped (concrete?) collar sealed by a door near ground level. The opposite, northwest elevation is of similar design to the southeast elevation, and is fenestrated with three 1/1 light, double -hung windows. 22. Architectural style: (see front page) 23. Landscape or special setting features: The building occupies a mixed commercial/residential/industrial setting, and is flanked on the left by a modern, cinder block - walled commercial building (316 Willow), with a large unpaved parking lot in front, and on the right by the one story, stuccoed former commercial building now occupied by the Education and Life Training Center (401 Linden Street). The property has a well -kept grass front lawn that is partially enclosed by a split rail fence. This lawn extends along the southeast side of the building. A tiny, unkempt rear yard behind the building is enclosed by a low, chain link fence. A historic detached garage is located in this backyard, near the northeast comer of the brick building. 24. Associated buildings, features or objects: 1: Type: detached garage Describe: This historic outbuilding is a shed -roofed, wood frame, 1 car garage, the walls of which are clad with horizontal drop siding (unpainted/weathered). The garage door faces northwest, and is sealed with a modem, painted wood tilt -up door. On the front (southwest) side of the garage is an entry equipped with a plain, painted wood door flanked by two small fixed windows. IV. ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY 25. Date of Construction: Source of Information: 26. Architect: Source of information: 27. Builder. Source of information: 28. Original Owner. Source of information: 29. Construction history: Estimate: 1907-08 Actual: Sanborn Map Company fire insurance maps of Fort Collins, 1906 and 1909 editions Fort Collins City Directories, 1902-present Unknown Unknown Helene J. Anderson Historic Building Inventory Record for 326 Willow Street, prepared by Front Range Research Associates, 1992; based on Transamerica Title Company tract books Sanborn map and city directory evidence suggests that this small brick building was erected in 1907. The open front porch was apparently added between 1925 and 1948. No other exterior changes are evident, although it appears that one southeast side window was removed and replaced, requiring partial removal and repair of the brickwork. The construction date of the detached garage is enigmatic, since it is not shown on Sanborn maps as late as 1948, but appears to be older than that. 30. Location: original Date of move(s) V. HISTORICAL ASSOCIATIONS 31. Original use(s): other use 32. Intermediate use(s): single dwelling i'i r`f$"an# IIon/c1• e:..w lw .h..nll:n.. 26-Mar-02 Old Fort Site Cultural Survey Project Balloffet-Entranco ' 345 E. Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 • (970) 221.3600 TOM 0 0 N I E L Q U. N ra to I 0 0 N M c E U fa Q Packet Pg. 264 326 Willow Street 5LR1562 3.i JJ. LOW 1 COIL 4,1017,01. Architectural Inventory Form a111yw uw021111y Page 4 of 8 34. Site type(s): Original use - sign painters' shop Intermediate use - private dwelling Current use - private dwelling 35. Historical background: (Resource number) Built in 1907, this small brick commercial building served initially as the shop of sign painter Joseph F. Stewart. Stewart and his wife lived at 319 Matthews Street in 1907, but moved into the shop building in 1908 and remained there through 1911 or 1912. Subsequently, the Stewarts apparently left town for a period of time, since they are not listed in the directory nor is Stewart's sign painting business. They evidently rented the building at 326 Willow (called 320 Willow in city directories) in 1913-14 to butcher Charles Masters, and Mrs. Taina Masters (a widow?). By 1917 the Stewarts had returned, and re -occupied this building as a dwelling and paint shop. As of 1919 they had moved both their home and business to 124 South Mason Street. The next occupants of this property were farmer Henry Trupp, and his wife Katie. The Trupps appear to have been German - Russian immigrants. Henry later changed occupations, and by 1933 he was identified as an automobile mechanic. Also living in the house were Henry Trupp, Jr., who in 1926 married another German -Russian immigrant with the same maiden name: Henrietta Edith Trupp. The Trupp family, including several offspring of Henry Jr. and Edith Trupp (the couple produced four sons and three daughters), occupied the house for approximately 55-60 years, until c. 1980. Apparently after the death of one of the sons, Calvin Trupp, in 1980, the house was sold. The property was later acquired by the Cienfuegos family, who also established an upholstery business nearby at 310 Willow Street. Presently the building serves as the residence of Joe Cienfuegos. 36. Sources of information: 26-Mar-02 Sanborn Map Company fire insurance maps of Fort Collins, 1906 and 1909 editions Fort Collins City Directories, 1902-present Historic Building Inventory Record for 326 Willow Street, prepared by Front Range Research Associates, 1992; based on Transamerica Title Company tract books Joe Cienfuegos, personal communication, July 18, 2001 Fort Collins City Directories, 1902-present Old Fort Site Cultural Survey Project Balloflet-Entranco ' 345 E. Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 ' (970) 221-3600 W_ W W H Z W 2 a O J W W 0 T 0 0 0 ti T a 0 a_ W U Z W J LL Z O U rn ti L0 Packet Pg. 265 326 Willow Street 5LR1562 3.i Architectural Inventory Form Page 5 of 8 VI, SIGNIFICANCE 37. Local landmark designation: Yes No Designation authority: Date of designation: 38. Applicable National Register criteria: Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguished entity whose components may lack individual distinction. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. ❑ Qualifies under Criteria Considerations A through (see manual). Fv� Does not meet any of the above National Register criteria. Fort Collins Standards for Designation: (Resource number) Architectural Significance ❑ The site, structure, object or district portrays the environment of a group of people in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architectural style; embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural - type specimen; is the work of an architect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the city or contains elements or architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a significant innovation. Geographical Significance The site, structure, object or district, because of being part of or related to a square, park, or other distinctive area, should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on a historic, cultural or architectural motif or due to its unique location or singular physical characteristics, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community or city. Historical Significance The site, structure, object or district has character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the city, state or nation; is the site of a historic event with an effect upon society; is identified with a person or group of persons who had some influence on society; or exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, social or historic heritage of the community. Not Significant Does not meet any of the local standards (listed above). Significance Not Determined Significance has not yet been determined. More data needed. 39. Area(s) of Significance: not applicable 40. Period of Significance: N/A 41. Level of significance: National: State Local 42. Statement of significance: 26-Mar-02 When recorded initially in 1992 by Front Range Research Associates, this property was evaluated as ineligible for the National Register of Historic Places. This small brick commercial/residential building does not embody sufficient architectural or historical significance to qualify for inclusion on the state or national registers of historic places. None of the occupants of this building appear to have contributed significantly to Fort Collins history, nor is the property associated with a significant trend or pattern of events in local history. However, the building exhibits excellent integrity and would qualify for designation as a Local Landmark as a locally rare, small scale example of very early 20th century brick mufti - purpose architecture. The associated detached garage retains sufficient integrity and would be considered a contributing element of the site since it reflects the historic use of the property. Old Fort Site Cultural Survey Project Balloffet-Entranco ' 345 E. Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 • (970) 221-3600 TOM 0 0 NI E L O U. O N O CU CO I 3 O 0 N M c O E U f� Q Packet Pg. 266 326 Willow Street 5LR1562 3.i Architectural Inventory Form 43. Assessment of historic physical integrity related to significance: (Resource number) This small brick building appears to be very well preserved, and is virtually unaltered except for the apparent addition of the open front porch. It is therefore judged to possess excellent integrity. The associated detached garage has good integrity. The only major change noted is the replacement of its original doors with a modem, painted wood, tilt -up door, and weathering of the exterior siding. VII. NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT 44. National Register eligibility field assessment: Fort Collins Local Landmark eligibility field assessment: Not Eligible Individually eligible for local landmark designation 45. Is there National Register district potential? Yes No 0 Discuss: This property is not associated with a significant concentration of other historic properties sharing a common r context. 0 0 If there is National Register district potential, is this building contributing: Yes ❑ No N/A 0 0 T 46. If the building is in existing National Register district, is it contributing: Yes No N/A t1 0 - a VIII. RECORDING INFORMATION w U 47. Photograph numbers): Roll 4, Frames 2-5 W Negatives filed at: City of Fort Collins, Advance Planning Department J u_ Fort Collins, CO 80524 Z O 48. Report title: Old Fort Site Cultural Survey Project U 49. Date(s): 07/18/01 rn ti LO 50. Recorder(s): Jason Marmor m 51. Organization: Balloffet-Entranco 0 52. Address: 345 E. Mountain Avenue 0N Fort Collins, CO 80524 E I 53. Phone number(s): (970) 221-3600 `O O Cl) O ca N I O O N M C d E U fU Q Old Fort Site Guttural Survey Project Balloffet-Entranco ' 345 E. Mountain Avenue 26-Mar-02 Fort Collins, CO 60524 ' (970) 221-3600 Packet Pg. 267 326 Willow Street DIY% Architectural Inventory Form Page 7 of 8 SITE SKETCH MAP Old Fart Site Cultural Survey Project Balloffet-Entranco ' 345 E. Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 ' (970) 221-3600 3.i 5LR1562 (Resource number) W_ W w FM W as O W W f' 0 O O ti TMM a_ u.l U z W D J LL z O r` L to TOM O NI E O um N 7 co N co O N C d L V a Packet Pg. 268 r VAN +! Mj!r J�r,•n "�i'•:L ,ley\�b'��,'�:. t�. S4.11 i t � 1^. s'[3. %t iipY ti7.:ilKli djA hS 4 +� rr .t. J Jr P+. S !J' / yJ •� j!+{ C iC. r; �� "�� y y C 1., ��fi�: y._•ff�i CJ���r.�y�;��:_ k'�� i��i�i�T l�i�'t+'��. ;. y °��..�.i�[�./.•7 tir• T .��♦♦�'r..4`,dC i}2i iY •,. p: y �5Yt1i}rr`j��n�h^ ryti Wt�,/iri %i1 (,?h�;if r`LI Al �'�+ i�J� ~ t y ` y /i,{wl'y`�i'!: -y .w• [ yi Cy r 2l`i 4w,!!f''rt i i'47f '�f{ i�f1 .�•�.��. 1r7< j %r. {, 4.lrl '\i�•: 2a i'r.'��y1� .-fi �'l`f. "•^���r�^ iL: t MIKT 3.i Local National Resource Eligibility Register Page Address Number Historic Building Name Assessment Eligibility Number 416 Linden Street 5LR10309 Not eligible Not eligible 155 418 Linden Street 5LR10310 Columbine Floral Products Not eligible Not eli_ible 163 office ` 414 Pine Street 5LR10311 Flores House Not eligible Not eligible 171 101 E Vine Drive 5LR10313 Unknown Not eligible Not eligible 179 103 E Vine Drive 5LRIO314 Unknown Need data Not eligible 187 105-107 E Vine Drive 5LR10315 Unknown Need data Noteligible 195 203 E Vine Drive 5LR103 l6 Sherman Brooks Motors, Inc. Not eligible Not eligible 203 209 E Vine Drive 5LR10317 Cinema Service. Inc. Not eligible Not eligible 211 213 E Vine Drive 5LRIO318 Yager House/ Farm Not eligible Not eligible 219 232 E Vine Drive 5LR1572 Inverness Farm Individually eligible for local Eligible 227 landmark designation 224 Willow Street 5LR10319 Herrod House Need data Not eligible 235 226 Willow Street SLRI0320 Martin House Not eligible Not eligible 243 308 Willow Street 5LR103211 Trujillo -Padilla House Noteligible Not eligible 251 316 Willow Street 5LR10352 Mahoney Refinishing Not eligible Not eligible 259 326 Willow Street 5LR1562 Stewart Sign Painting Shop Individually eligible for local Not eligible 267 landmark designation weunesda). March 2t, 200_ W W W H Z W a O W W TOM 0 0 r` a 0 a_ W (U Z W J tL Z O rn r` LO u7 v r O O C\1 E L O um N CO N CO 31 O 0 N M C d L C� t4 a Packet Pg. 270 1 -;OA- ' # } }ra x 1 3 Y 'Its• � k }' New — } _ - f'I k l � i'M14 v 11 _ :1L _ 4 �J_•' x��ti l] jjkk Fr i 14 rl ' .'s;[Y,J '.a _' - •.�. _ '�I�I� _rya �- %` .�' � wy 'N ai i �5 i'4 : ''_ •� *� ` 1 � J �T- wFr• •ua.i r+ ks it �f.7U��":I.a o.1..'•_a'r� IYr' s.k� ' wr k • 4r + 4 4}~ Item 3, Exhibit 1 Confluence - Photos of Materials Submitted at Hearing Photos of Building Material Samples Circulated to the Commission at the Hearing by the Applicant i� Packet Pg. 272-1