HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/21/2019 - Landmark Preservation Commission - Agenda - Regular MeetingMeg Dunn, Chair City Council Chambers
Alexandra Wallace, Co-Vice Chair City Hall West
Kristin Gensmer, Co-Vice Chair 300 Laporte Avenue
Michael Bello Fort Collins, Colorado
Mollie Bredehoft
Katie Dorn
Kevin Murray
Anne Nelsen
Anna Simpkins
Fort Collins is a Certified Local Government (CLG) authorized by the National Park Service and History Colorado based
on its compliance with federal and state historic preservation standards. CLG standing requires Fort Collins to maintain
a Landmark Preservation Commission composed of members of which a minimum of 40% meet federal standards for
professional experience from preservation-related disciplines, including, but not limited to, historic architecture,
architectural history, archaeology, and urban planning. For more information, see Article III, Division 19 of the Fort
Collins Municipal Code.
The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and
will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for
assistance.
Video of the meeting will be broadcast at 1:30 p.m. the following day through the Comcast cable system on Channel
14 or 881 (HD). Please visit http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/ for the daily cable schedule. The video will also be available
for later viewing on demand here: http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php.
Regular Meeting
AUGUST 21, 2019
5:30 PM
• CALL TO ORDER
• ROLL CALL
• AGENDA REVIEW
o Staff Review of Agenda
o Consent Agenda Review
This Review provides an opportunity for the Commission and citizens to pull items from the
Consent Agenda. Anyone may request an item on this calendar be “pulled” off the Consent
Agenda and considered separately.
Commission-pulled Consent Agenda items will be considered before Discussion Items.
Citizen-pulled Consent Agenda items will be considered after Discussion Items.
Landmark Preservation Commission
AGENDA
Packet Pg. 1
• STAFF REPORTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
• PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
• DISCUSSION AGENDA
1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF JUNE 19, 2019
The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the June 19, 2019 regular meeting of the
Landmark Preservation Commission.
2. 612 S HOWES – DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed duplex addition to a historic property, 612 S Howes (the Anderson-
Goff House, 1900). Site alterations would include a five-stall parking pad on
the alley side and a shared courtyard between the old and new residences.
The project would retain the existing residence without alterations and
demolish the detached 1948 garage.
APPLICANT: Stan Arnett, r4 Architects
OWNER: Center Green Properties, LLC
3. 220 EAST LAUREL STREET – APPEAL OF STAFF DESIGN REVIEW DECISION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for consideration of an appeal of Staff’s decision to deny a
Certificate of Appropriateness for proposed alterations to the Long
Apartment Complex, 220 East Laurel Street. The property is an officially
designated Fort Collins Landmark.
APPLICANT/OWNER: Annie Obermann, Forge and Bow Dwellings, for D.L. Obermann Trust,
Owner.
4. LINDEN STREET IMPROVEMENTS – DESIGN REVIEW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create a “convertible” street on Linden Street from Walnut to Jefferson,
combining roadway, on-street parking, pedestrian walkways, event space,
placemaking elements, and artwork.
APPLICANT: City of Fort Collins Engineering Department (Kyle Lambrecht); Ditesco (Keith
Meyer); Russell Mills Studios (Craig Russell)
• OTHER BUSINESS
• ADJOURNMENT
Packet Pg. 2
Date:
Roll Call Bello Bredehoft Dorn Gensmer Murray Nelsen Simpkins Wallace Dunn Vote
absent absent absent absent 5 present
Minutes of June 19, 2019 Bello Murray Gensmer Dorn Wallace Bredehoft Nelsen Simpkins Dunn
Yes absent Yes absent absent Yes Yes absent Yes 5:0
220 E Laurel Design Review Appeal Gensmer Dorn Wallace Bredehoft Nelsen Simpkins Bello Murray Dunn
Yes absent absent Yes Yes absent Yes absent Yes 5:0
Roll Call & Voting Record
Landmark Preservation Commission
8/21/2019
Landmark Preservation Commission Hearing
Date: 8-21-19
Document Log
(Any written comments or documents received since the agenda packet was published.)
DISCUSSION AGENDA:
1. Draft Minutes for the LPC June 19, 2019 Hearing
2. 612 S HOWES – DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
o See Exhibits below – Items rec’d on hearing day
3. 220 EAST LAUREL STREET – APPEAL OF STAFF DESIGN REVIEW
DECISION
• Att 10 – LPC Requests – Added 8-20-19
• Att 11 – Updated Landscape Plans– Added 8-20-19
• Staff Presentation – Revised 8-20-19
4. LINDEN STREET IMPROVEMENTS – DESIGN REVIEW
• None
EXHIBITS RECEIVED DAY OF/DURING HEARING:
Item # Exhibit # Description:
2 1 Updated Staff Report
2 2 Updated Staff Presentation
2 3 Applicant Responses to LPC Requests
2 4 Applicant Presentation
4 1 Applicant Presentation
Agenda Item 1
Item 1, Page 1
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY August 21, 2019
Landmark Preservation Commission
STAFF
Gretchen Schiager, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT
CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF JUNE 19, 2019 REGULAR MEETING
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the June 19, 2019 regular meeting of the Landmark
Preservation Commission.
ATTACHMENTS
1. LPC June 19, 2019 Minutes - DRAFT
Packet Pg. 3
DRAFT
Landmark Preservation Commission Page 1 June 19, 2019
Meg Dunn, Chair City Council Chambers
Alexandra Wallace, Co-Vice Chair City Hall West
Kristin Gensmer, Co-Vice Chair 300 Laporte Avenue
Michael Bello Fort Collins, Colorado
Mollie Bredehoft
Katie Dorn
Kevin Murray
Anne Nelsen
Anna Simpkins
The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and
will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for
assistance.
Video of the meeting will be broadcast at 1:30 p.m. the following day through the Comcast cable system on Channel
14 or 881 (HD). Please visit http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/ for the daily cable schedule. The video will also be available
for later viewing on demand here: http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php.
Regular Meeting
June 19, 2019
Minutes
• CALL TO ORDER
Chair Dunn called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m.
• ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Dunn, Wallace, Bello, Bredehoft, Dorn, Gensmer, Murray, Nelsen
ABSENT: Simpkins
STAFF: McWilliams, Bzdek, Bumgarner, Yatabe, Schiager
• AGENDA REVIEW
No changes to posted agenda.
• STAFF REPORTS
None.
• PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
None.
Landmark
Preservation
Commission
ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1
Packet Pg. 4
DRAFT
Landmark Preservation Commission Page 2 June 19, 2019
• CONSENT AGENDA
1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2019.
The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the March 20, 2019 regular meeting of the
Landmark Preservation Commission.
2. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2019.
The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the April 17, 2019 regular meeting of the
Landmark Preservation Commission.
Ms. Dorn moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission approve the Consent Agenda.
Ms. Nelson seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
• DISCUSSION AGENDA
3. MANEVAL / MASON / SAUER PROPERTY, 100 FIRST STREET - APPLICATION FOR FORT
COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION
DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council
regarding landmark designation for the Maneval/Mason/Sauer Property.
APPLICANT: Lori Juszak, Owner
Staff Report
Yani Jones, Historic Preservation Intern, presented the staff report. She provided historical background
about the property, including photographs of the property over time. She explained Staff’s justification
for its recommendation of landmark designation and reviewed the relevant code standards.
Applicant Presentation
Ms. Juszak thanked the Staff for their work on the application. She explained that she purchased the
property to preserve it. She also thanked the Commission for their consideration.
Public Input
Jerry Gavaldon, lifelong resident of Fort Collins and President of the Museo del las Tres Colonias,
addressed the Commission. He shared about his long family history in Andersonville. He commented
that Hispanics have been part of the history of this property and the sugar beet industry. He expressed
support for the designation.
Cheryl Glanz shared some of her family history in the Buckingham and Andersonville area. She stated
she is on the Board of the Northern Colorado Historical Society of Germans from Russia and is
President of the Cache la Poudre-North Park Scenic Byway Council and State Byways Commission.
She expressed support for the designation.
Commission Questions and Discussion
Mr. Murray commented that the store was helpful to the Hispanic community as well as the German
Russians. Ms. McWilliams said staff would be happy to add that to the application if the Commission
desires.
Ms. Gensmer stated the property meets all four standards for significance, specifically noting its
information potential and the importance of its eligibility under Standard 4. She stated that privy
excavation can provide important information.
Ms. Wallace agreed that all four of the standards are met and brought up possible future excavation of
the privy. Members emphasized having a properly credentialed professional perform that work.
Mr. Murray commented about the mailbox and commended Ms. Jones for the research.
Members discussed the rarity of false storefronts in the City, adding to this property’s significance and
the importance of preserving it.
Ms. Dorn agreed with the findings of the report and stated all aspects of integrity were intact.
Ms. Wallace said this property represents the story of a part of Fort Collins not often recognized.
ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1
Packet Pg. 5
DRAFT
Landmark Preservation Commission Page 3 June 19, 2019
Chair Dunn agreed with Ms. Wallace, tying her comment to Policy (a) with regard to civic pride, and
Policy (b) with regard to the cultural and aesthetic standing of the City. She also pointed out that this
shop represents several decades worth of history.
Mr. Murray commented that this designation allows continued private ownership and gives the owner
access to monies that can help maintain and preserve the property.
Chair Dunn pointed out this property also aligns with Policy (b) in terms of heritage tourism and is in a
prime location to be seen.
Chair Dunn also commented on how this property fulfills Purpose (c), noting that grants and tax credits
can help stabilize this property and the character and history of the neighborhood.
Chair Dunn discussed how the incremental growth of the property represents good urban design,
aligning with Purpose (f).
Mr. Murray discussed the history around the sugar beet factory and mentioned that preserving this
building helps to prevent overdevelopment in this ecological area.
Members expressed support for including the Hispanic history related to this property in the designation
documents under Standard 2, Persons/Groups. Mr. Yatabe said that could be added to the motion and
Staff can add it later.
Commission Deliberation
Mr. Murray moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend that City Council
adopt an ordinance to designate the Maneval/Mason/Sauer Property, 100 First Street, as a Fort
Collins Landmark, finding that this property is eligible for its significance to Fort Collins under
Standards 1. Events; 2. Persons/Groups, 3. Design/Construction; and 4. Information Potential,
as supported by the analysis provided in the staff report dated June 19, 2019; and that the
property clearly conveys this significance through all seven aspects of integrity; and finding
also that the designation of this property will promote the policies and purposes of the City as
specified in Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code, with an addendum that the history of the Hispanic
community be added under Standard 2.
Ms. Dorn seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Chair Dunn thanked the owner and staff for bringing this nomination forward.
• OTHER BUSINESS
Members discussed having a representative from History Colorado attend an upcoming meeting to
discuss State guidelines.
Chair Dunn requested future staff reports include whether the applicant has been made aware of design
assistance, tax credits, or other available public assistance, and whether they used them.
Chair Dunn asked Staff to make sure the Commission has an opportunity to review and provide input
on the upcoming changes to the Linden/Walnut area.
• ADJOURNMENT
Chair Dunn adjourned the meeting at 6:29 p.m.
Minutes respectfully submitted by Gretchen Schiager.
Minutes approved by a vote of the Commission on __________________.
_____________________________________
Meg Dunn, Chair
ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1
Packet Pg. 6
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 1
STAFF REPORT August 21, 2019
Landmark Preservation Commission
PROJECT NAME
612 S HOWES – DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
STAFF
Maren Bzdek, Senior Historic Preservation Planner
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed duplex addition to a historic property, 612 S Howes (the Anderson-
Goff House, 1900). Site alterations would include a five-stall parking pad on
the alley side and a shared courtyard between the old and new residences.
The project would retain the existing residence without alterations and
demolish the detached 1948 garage.
APPLICANT: Stan Arnett, r4 Architects
OWNER: Center Green Properties, LLC
RECOMMENDATION: N/A
LPC’S ROLE: At this meeting, the Landmark Preservation Commission will provide comments to the applicant and
City staff regarding this project’s compliance with the standards in Fort Collins Land Use Code section 3.4.7. The
applicant will return for a recommendation to the decision maker from the Commission at a later date.
BACKGROUND: The applicant has completed a conceptual development review process with City staff and is
now seeking initial comments from the Commission regarding compliance with Land Use Code Section 3.4.7 for
the attached proposed plans. As part of the pre-submittal requirements for a development application, the
applicant ordered a third-party, intensive-level survey (attached) to provide an updated determination on the
property’s eligibility for Fort Collins landmark designation. The survey professional concluded that the property,
constructed in 1900, is eligible for designation as a landmark under Standard B for its association with the lives of
several people important to the history of Fort Collins: siblings Carl and Maude Anderson and Ralph Goff, who all
owned and managed the Fort Collins Courier, and Harper Goff, designer of Disneyland’s Main Street USA
attraction, who lived in the home in his youth. The property is situated on a block that includes several other
historic resources that are eligible for landmark designation.
PROPOSED DESIGN: Two-story duplex containing two two-bedroom units and a new parking pad
accommodating five spaces at the rear of the property on the alley. Primary building materials are wood lap siding,
wood board & batten siding, and a stone veneer product.
AREA OF ADJACENCY SUMMARY: The area of adjacency extends to an outer boundary that is 200 hundred
feet in all directions from the perimeter of the development site. Any lot or parcel of property is within the area of
adjacency if any portion of the lot or parcel crosses the 200-foot outer boundary.
According to the requirements in 3.4.7(B), staff has identified the following historic resources that meet the above
requirement and shall be used for the establishment of the Historic Influence Area, to which the standards in
Packet Pg. 7
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 2
3.4.7(E) apply.
• Historic Resources on the Development Site, Abutting, or Across a Side Alley:
• The Anderson-Goff House (1900; on development site, includes 1948 garage)
• 608 S Howes (abutting; eligible for landmark designation)
• Other Historic Resources within 200 feet:
• 620 S Howes, eligible for landmark designation
• 624 S Howes, eligible for landmark designation
• 629 S Howes, eligible for landmark designation
• Historic Influence Area: The historic influence area, within which the standards provided in LUC 3.4.7
apply, includes the entire development site.
REVIEW CRITERIA AND STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT:
Land Use Code (LUC) Section 3.4.7, Historic and Cultural Resources, contains the applicable standards for
new buildings, where designated or eligible historic landmarks or historic districts are part of the development site
or surrounding neighborhood context.
3.4.7(D): Treatment of Historic Resources on Development Sites – Design Review
The Commission will need to determine if the proposal complies with the relevant code section, 3.4.7(D)(3), which
requires the preservation and adaptive use of eligible resources on the development site, following the Secretary of
the Interior’s Standards to the maximum extent feasible.
There are two historic structures on the development site: the residence and a detached garage. The applicant
plans to retain the existing historic residence (1900) without any proposed exterior alterations.
The proposal calls for demolition of the detached garage (1948) to accommodate the new duplex and required
parking. The proposed demolition of a secondary structure is somewhat offset by the applicant’s plans to avoid
alterations to the primary residence and the fact that the garage was not constructed during the period of
significance for the property (1900-1925, the period of occupation for the Anderson and Goff residents). Staff
therefore finds that the garage demolition should be a secondary consideration relative to the treatment proposed
for the primary historic residence; the “TBD” notations below reflect the preliminary nature of this conclusion in
advance of the Commission’s discussion of the matter.
Applicable
Code
Standard
Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Standard
Met (Y/N)
SOI #1
A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires
minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial
relationships;
The proposal maintains the historic residential, multifamily use of the property
and preserves its most significant historic resource associated with its period of
significance, i.e. the primary residence. The automotive parking and access
space on the rear of property from the alley is maintained. It does create
changes to the spatial relationships on the site through densification and the loss
of the existing rear yard and garage. The relative importance of that secondary
structure should be established in the conceptual review in order to complete the
analysis of this standard.
TBD
Packet Pg. 8
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 3
SOI #2
The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal
of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships
that characterize a property will be avoided.
As with Standard #1, the proposed project is partially compliant with this
standard because it alters the spatial relationships of the site and includes the
demolition of the garage. The relative importance of that secondary structure
should be established in the conceptual review in order to complete the analysis
of this standard.
TBD
SOI #3
Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use.
Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding
conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be
undertaken.
The new construction and site alterations are clearly of their own time. The front
of the property along Howes continues to serve as a record of the 20th century
use of the site.
Y
SOI #4
Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right
will be retained and preserved.
The survey document treats the garage as a historic alteration to the property,
contemporaneous with the rear addition and the stucco alteration to the
residence. On the other hand, it was constructed after the period of significance
suggested by the survey, which would be the combined period of occupation by
the Anderson and Goff residents (1900 to 1925), and the property was
determined to only be eligible under Criterion B. As such, staff finds the loss of
the garage is mitigated in this case. The relative importance of that secondary
structure should be established in the conceptual review in order to complete the
analysis of this standard.
TBD
SOI #5 Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples
of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.
As with Standards #1 and #2, the demolition of the garage does not meet this
requirement, but the preservation of the residence, with no proposed alterations,
clearly meets this standard. The relative importance of that secondary structure
should be established in the conceptual review in order to complete the analysis
of this standard.
TBD
SOI #6 Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the
severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new
feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible,
materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by
documentary and physical evidence.
N/A
Packet Pg. 9
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 4
SOI #7
Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the
gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will
not be used.
N/A
SOI #8
Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such
resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.
N/A
SOI #9
New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy
historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be
differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale,
and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its
environment.
The proposed demolition of the garage does not meet the first part of this
standard; the proposed new work is generally compatible with and differentiated
from the original building and is clearly new construction as a separate structure
on the site. The relative importance of that secondary structure should be
established in the conceptual review in order to complete the analysis of this
standard.
TBD
SOI #10
New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in
such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of
the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.
Again, this standard would be met without the proposed demolition of the
garage, so the finding will need to reflect the Commission’s conclusions about
the relative importance of that secondary structure to the site history as a whole.
TBD
Packet Pg. 10
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 5
3.4.7(E)(1): Design Requirements for a Proposed Development
Applicable
Code
Standard
Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Standard
Met (Y/N)
Massing
and
Building
Articulation
1. New construction shall be similar in width or, if larger, be articulated into
massing reflective of the mass and scale of historic resources on the
development site, abutting, or across a side alley.
The width of the original historic structure is 25 feet; the offset rear addition extends
the overall width of the ground floor to approximately 30 feet on the rear elevation.
The proposed building width is about 10 feet wider at 40 feet. The distance
between the two structures is 28’-10” which allows for a shared courtyard between
the buildings. The greater width of the new structure means that it is somewhat
visible from Howes Street, although the matching building heights help to reduce
the impact. From the less important alley view, it seems likely that the original
historic structure will be very difficult to see.
TBD
Massing
and
Building
Articulation
2. In all zone districts, stepbacks must be located on new buildings to create
gradual massing transitions at the same height or one story above the
height of historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a
side alley. Additionally, in the Downtown zone district, the widest portions
of stepbacks required in the Downtown zone district stepback standard
shall be on building portions closest to historic resources.
Because the building heights are the same, no stepback is required.
N/A
Building
Materials
3. The lower story facades until any stepback (required or otherwise) must be
constructed of authentic, durable, high quality materials (brick, stone,
glass, terra cotta, stucco (non EVIS), precast concrete, wood, cast iron,
architectural metal) installed to industry standards.
More information about the proposed stone product is required to evaluate how the
proposed material meets this standard.
TBD
Building
Materials
4. New construction shall reference one or more of the predominate
material(s) on historic resources on the development site, abutting, or
across a side alley, by using at least two of the following to select the
primary material(s) for any one to three story building on the lower story
facades until any stepbacks (required or otherwise): 1) type; 2) scale; 3)
color; 4) three-dimensionality; 5) pattern.
The applicant references the native sandstone on the lower story of 620 Howes as
the basis for the use of stone on the lower story of the new duplex. The applicant
notes that lap siding and vertical board and batten are used in secondary
structures at the rear of properties on the same block. Commission feedback on
these materials choices will be helpful; staff finds that the proposal meets the
technical requirement of these standards, but the proposal would benefit from
some consultation with the Commission to strengthen it.
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 6
Façade
Details
5. Use at least one of the following: 1) similar window pattern; 2) similar
window proportion of height to width; 3) similar solid-to-void pattern as
found on historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a
side alley.
The predominate window proportions in the area of adjacency are vertically
oriented rectangular openings, mostly as single one-over-one windows with a few
pairs. While the window pattern and proportion of the windows used in the new
construction vary somewhat from their context, they maintain a similar solid-to-void
pattern with the exception of the side elevations. Staff suggests that the applicant
give more attention to meeting this standard in the next round to strengthen the
compliance with one or more of these standards.
TBD
Façade
Details
6. Use select horizontal or vertical reference lines or elements (such as
rooflines, cornices, and bell courses) to relate the new construction to
historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley.
Floor heights and roof heights are similar; the contemporary roofline is contrasting,
although with similar pitch. Any simple suggestions to increase compliance with
this standard would be helpful.
TBD
Visibility of
Historic
Features
New construction shall not cover or obscure character-defining architectural
elements, such as windows or primary design features of historic resources on
the development site, abutting, or across a side alley.
The position of the new construction on the site prevents visual impact on the
existing structure at the front of the lot. Visibility is greatly impacted from the less
important alley view, as noted above, but the visibility of the rear elevation and its
features is retained from the interior of the site.
Y
3.4.7(E)(3): Plan of Protection
A plan of protection will be required prior to the Landmark Preservation Commission providing a recommendation
to the decision maker regarding a development project. Staff will work with the applicant to add this to the review
packet for the next discussion with the Commission.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Area of Adjacency Map
2. LPC Application
3. Architectural Inventory Form
4. Staff Presentation
Packet Pg. 12
2,257
376.2
612 S Howes - Area of Adjacency for 3.4.7
This map is a user generated static output from the City of Fort Collins FCMaps
Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this
map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable.
City of Fort Collins - GIS
286.0
1:
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere
0 143.00 286.0 Feet
Notes
Legend
1,715
Parcels
Growth Management Area
Parks
Schools
Natural Areas
City Limits
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1
Packet Pg. 13
0DVVLQJDQG%XLOGLQJ$UWLFXODWLRQ
• The proposed new construction will be detached and
set back from the existing structure. This is to allow
the street view from Howes Street to remain in its
current existing state with minimal site lines of the
new structure on the back of the lot.
• The building setbacks will be maintained on the
proposed structure. Building heights will be nearly
matched to the existing structure for consistency.
%XLOGLQJ0DWHULDOV
• At the lower story of the proposed duplex a stone
finish has been selected for an authentic durable
finish that will relate to the neighborhood. The home
located at 620 S. Howes St. is an example of stone
being used for the entire ground floor (See photo on
sheet ARCH-2). A commercial building on W. Myrtle
St. that is just north along the alleyway adjacent to the
proposed project. Windows and doors with glass will
be included within the field of stone for natural
daylighting, egress and to aid in the overall massing.
• Stone has been selected to reference the historic
materials used for foundations in the neighborhood
including color and scale of the stone. Additionally lap
siding and board & batten siding has been selected to
reference the construction of detached garages found
along the back alleyway. The design uses the lap
siding to provide a sense of identity to each half of the
duplex and aid in the overall massing structure.
)DFDGH'HWDLOV
• Windows on the existing homes in the neighborhood
vary in proportion, scale and style. The intent is to use
window sizes and proportions that are similar to the
adjacent homes to the proposed project.
• In the massing of the project the transition from the
base stone material to the siding at the second floor is
based on the soffit heights on the existing structure
and the adjacent homes on each side. The upper
soffit has been designed to align with the existing
structure as well with similar overhang depths.
9LVLELOLW\RI+LVWRULF)HDWXUHV
• The proposed new construction will be detached and
set back from the existing structure to maintain the
integrity of the existing home. This is to allow the
street view from Howes Street to remain in its current
existing state with minimal site lines of the new
structure on the back of the lot.
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
$5&+,7(&76
As indicated
7/24/2019 2:41:51 PM
$5&+
3D Views & Historic Summary
+RZHV 2018-32
7/25/2019
612 S. Howes Street SA
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Existing stone base all
around ground floor at
620 S. Howes Street.
Existing duplex and
applicable project site
612 S. Howes Street
Existing Shed and
applicable project site
612 S. Howes Street
606 608 616 620 624
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
$5&+,7(&76
3/16" = 1'-0"
7/24/2019 2:41:51 PM
$5&+
Existing Neighborhood Photos
+RZHV 2018-32
7/25/2019
612 S. Howes Street SA
Fort Collins, CO 80524
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
1HLJKERULQJ+RPHVRQ+RZHV6WUHHW 1HLJKERULQJ6WUXFWXUHVDW$OOH\ZD\
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 15
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
$5&+,7(&76
7/24/2019 2:41:56 PM
$5&+
3D Views of Proposed
+RZHV 2018-32
7/25/2019
612 S. Howes Street SA
Fort Collins, CO 80524
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
1 LPC Application 7/25/2019
9LHZ)URP%DFN&RXUW\DUG 9LHZ)URP$OOH\ZD\
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 16
First Floor Plan
100' - 0"
Roof Bearing
118' - 5"
Second Floor
110' - 3 7/8"
Board & Batten Wood
Siding, Painted
Standing Seam Metal Roof
Asphalt Shingle Roof
Wood Lap Siding, Painted
Stone Finish
First Floor Plan
100' - 0"
Roof Bearing
118' - 5"
Second Floor
110' - 3 7/8"
First Floor Plan
100' - 0"
Roof Bearing
118' - 5"
Second Floor
110' - 3 7/8"
Proposed New Residential Shared Courtyard Existing Home To Remain As Is
Board & Batten Wood
Siding, Painted
Asphalt Shingle Roof
Wood Lap Siding, Painted
Stone Finish
Existing Stucco Finish to
Remain
Alleyway Howes Street
Existing Wood Deck & Stairs
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
$5&+,7(&76
1/8" = 1'-0"
7/24/2019 2:41:59 PM
$5&+
Exterior Elevations
+RZHV 2018-32
7/25/2019
612 S. Howes Street Author
Fort Collins, CO 80524
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
1 LPC Application 7/25/2019
(DVW(OHYDWLRQ :HVW(OHYDWLRQ
1RUWK(OHYDWLRQ
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 17
40' - 0"
20' - 0" 20' - 0"
Bench
Bench
13' - 6" 6' - 2" 8" 6' - 2" 13' - 6"
3' - 6" 21' - 0"
Back Patio
Eat-In Kitchen Living Room
Powder Bath
Back Patio
Eat-In Kitchen Living Room
Powder Bath
Covered
Main
Entry
Covered
Main
Entry
UP
UP
Bedroom No.1 Bedroom No.2
3/4 Bath
Laundry
DN
Bedroom No.1 Bedroom No.2
3/4 Bath
Laundry
DN
28' - 0"
20' - 0" 20' - 0"
40' - 0"
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
$5&+,7(&76
3/16" = 1'-0"
7/24/2019 2:42:00 PM
$5&+
Floor Plans
+RZHV 2018-32
7/25/2019
612 S. Howes Street SA
Fort Collins, CO 80524
1 3/16" = 1'-0"
1 - First Floor Plan
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
1 LPC Application 7/25/2019
2 3/16" = 1'-0"
2 - Second Floor
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 18
UP
UP
Existing Paved Alleyway
S. Howes Street
3DUNLQJ5HT
VLQ72'
• One (1) bedroom – 0.75 spaces x 1 = 0.75 spaces
• Three (2) bedroom - 1.0 spaces x 3 = 3 spaces
• 7 Bedrooms Overall = 3.75 Spaces Req'd
5 VSDFHVSURYLGHG
Existing
2-Story Building
(1) 1 Bedroom
(1) 2 Bedroom
Proposed 5 parking spaces
24.00 17.00
5.90 40.50 5.19
)RUW&ROOLQV/DQG8VH&RGH
Zoning: CC (Community Commercial District)
Located within the TOD
Residential Use is considered 6HFRQGDU\8VH
Permitted Use: Rental Houses (5) or fewer
Administrative Review: Rental Houses (50) or fewer
Dimensional Standards
Building Frontage: 40% minimum
Maximum height: 5 Stories (20' height minimum)
Building Side Setbacks: 5 feet
Building Rear Setback @ Alley: 8 feet
Landscape Side Setback Area: 5 feet
,QWHUQDWLRQDO%XLOGLQJ&RGH
Occupancy: R2 - Multi-Family Residential
Construction Type: VB, sprinklered (P2904)
Stories: 2 Stories
Maximum building height: 25 ft
5.00 5.00
51.58
190.00
8.00
Typical
9.00
Proposed
2-Story Building
(1) 2 Bedroom
(1) 2 Bedroom
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
$5&+,7(&76
1/16" = 1'-0"
8/7/2019 2:10:52 PM
$5&+6
Architectural Site Plan
+RZHV 2018-32
7/25/2019
612 S. Howes Street SA
Fort Collins, CO 80524
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
1 LPC Application 7/25/2019
UP
UP
Existing Paved Alleyway
S. Howes Street
3DUNLQJ5HT
VLQ72'
• One (1) bedroom – 0.75 spaces x 1 = 0.75 spaces
• Three (2) bedroom - 1.0 spaces x 3 = 3 spaces
• 7 Bedrooms Overall = 3.75 Spaces Req'd
5 VSDFHVSURYLGHG
Existing
2-Story Building
(1) 1 Bedroom
(1) 2 Bedroom
Proposed 5 parking spaces
24.00 17.00
5.90 40.50 5.19
)RUW&ROOLQV/DQG8VH&RGH
Zoning: CC (Community Commercial District)
Located within the TOD
Residential Use is considered 6HFRQGDU\8VH
Permitted Use: Rental Houses (5) or fewer
Administrative Review: Rental Houses (50) or fewer
Dimensional Standards
Building Frontage: 40% minimum
Maximum height: 5 Stories (20' height minimum)
Building Side Setbacks: 5 feet
Building Rear Setback @ Alley: 8 feet
Landscape Side Setback Area: 5 feet
,QWHUQDWLRQDO%XLOGLQJ&RGH
Occupancy: R2 - Multi-Family Residential
Construction Type: VB, sprinklered (P2904)
Stories: 2 Stories
Maximum building height: 25 ft
5.00 5.00
51.58
190.00
8.00
Typical
9.00
Proposed
2-Story Building
(1) 2 Bedroom
(1) 2 Bedroom
28.10
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
$5&+,7(&76
1/16" = 1'-0"
8/7/2019 2:28:28 PM
$5&+6
Architectural Site Plan
+RZHV 2018-32
7/25/2019
612 S. Howes Street SA
Fort Collins, CO 80524
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
# $
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31 ;2
7A9D3B:;5 @8AD?3F;A@
$! F: (;C:?45< %ADF: &-:31 .7EF
%
;2@41 *.
;2@41%
;2@41 %
;2'1/@5;:
)(!&121>1:/1,;:1
-?@5:3
";>@45:3
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
;2
A@7 6AG4>7 :G@9 E3E: I;@6AIE I;F: IAA6 8D3?7E 3@6 EGDDAG@6E
&@ F:7
E75A@68>AAD3D7F:D77A@7 AH7D A@76AG4>7 :G@9E3E:I;@6AIEI;F:E3@6EFA@7
E;>>E3@6IAA68D3?7E3@6EGDDAG@6E
>/45@1/@A>-8'@E81A5805:3(E<1 AGDECG3D7
-:0?/-<5:3 ;> '<1/5-8 '1@@5:3 1-@A>1? +:;E D7E;67@57 ;E >A53F76 A@ F:7 73EF
E;67 A8 AI7E *FD77F 8AGD :AGE7E EAGF: A8 $KDF>7 *FD77F
+:;E B>357E ;F >7EE
F:3@ A@7 4>A5= @ADF: A8 A>AD36A *F3F7 ,@;H7DE;FK ;@ 3@ 3D73 A55GB;76 4K
:AGE7E3@6:73H;>KBABG>3F764KEFG67@FE
+AF:7I7EF35DAEE AI7E*FD77F;E
3>3D97A88;574G;>6;@9F:3F;EAI@763@6A55GB;764KA>AD36A*F3F7,@;H7DE;FK
+:7:AGE78357EI7EFA@FA387@5768DA@FK3D6B>3@F76I;F:9D3EE3@64;E75F76
4K 3 5A@5D7F7 E;67I3>=
$3FGD7 FD77E >;@7 3 FD77 >3I@ 3>A@9 F:7 EFD77F
+:7
435=K3D6;E>3D97>KAB7@B>3@F76I;F:9D3EE3@64AD67D764K87@57E3@6FD77E
67F35:7693D397;E>A53F763FF:7D73DA8F:7>AF3>A@9F:73>>7K
E;67I3>=
DG@E8DA?F:793D397FAF:77@FD3@57;@FAF:7D73D366;F;A@
??;/5-@10A5805:3?1-@A>1?;>#.61/@?
3D397 N +:;E A@7 EFADK IAA6 8D3?7 4G;>6;@9 I;F: 3 8AAFBD;@F A8 R J R ;E
>A53F7673EFA8F:7:AGE73>A@9F:73>>7KI3K
F:A>6EFIA3GFA?A4;>743KEA@7
3FF:757@F7D3@6F:7AF:7DFAF:7@ADF:4AF:3557EE768DA?F:73>>7KFAF:773EF
+:7 EAGF:7D@ A@7 F:;D6 A8 F:7 4G;>6;@9 3BB73DE FA :A>6 E:AB 3@6 AD EFAD397
EB357 F:3F ;E 3557EE76 8DA? F:7 EAGF:
)7EF;@9 GBA@ 3 5A@5D7F7 B36 F:7
4G;>6;@9RE7JF7D;ADI3>>E3D78;@;E:76I;F:4A3D63@643FF7@E;6;@9
+:7DAA8;E
E;67 934>763@68;@;E:76I;F:5A?BAE;F;A@E:;@9>7E3@67JBAE76D38F7D7@6E
+IAAH7D:73693D3976AADE3D7BD7E7@FA@F:773EFI3>>A@7A8F:7?3BB73D;@9
FA47?G5:A>67DF:3@F:7AF:7D
+:7EAGF:I3>>:A>6E3IAA6B3@7>6AADI;F:3
4A3D676 GBB7D >;9:F 3>A@9 I;F: FIA E?3>> 4A3D676 I;@6AIE I;F: IAA6
EGDDAG@6E FA F:7 73EF
>A@9 F:7I7EFI3>> 3D7 F:D77 E?3>>I;@6AIE
+IAA8
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31;2
A5801>;:@>-/@;> ,@=@AI@
';A>/1;2 :2;>9-@5;: %AFBB>;534>7
#>535:-8#C:1> 3D>@67DEA@
';A>/1;2 :2;>9-@5;: O;FK3@6AG@FDKP " !' # BD;>
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31;2
5?@;>5/-8 .-/73>;A:0 +:;E BDAB7DFK 8;DEF 3BB73D76 ;@ F:7 :;EFAD;5 D75AD6 ;@
&5FA47D
I:7@3>>A8F:7H353@F>3@6;@4>A5=
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31;2
&@BD;>
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31;2
;@HA>H76 I;F: F:7 83?;>K BG4>;E:;@9 4GE;@7EE
7 7EE7@F;3>>K EF7BB76 ;@FA
$3G67REBAE;F;A@E3EE75D7F3DK3@636H7DF;E;@9?3@397D
>F:AG9:F:7 #
I3E EA>6 ;@
)3>B: 5A@F;@G76 A@ 3E ;FE E75D7F3DK FD73EGD7D 3@6
EGB7D;@F7@67@F
@!G@7
F:7:A?7E7DH763EF:7H7@G78AD3@AF:7D83?;>K
I766;@9 F:;E F;?7A8!7EE7 !
!A@7E 3@6>3D3'73D>7@67DEA@ F:7 KAG@97D
E;EF7DA83D>3@6$3G67
'73D>79D36G3F768DA?F:7*F3F7+735:7DERA>>797;@
D77>7K3@6:36477@7?B>AK763E3 ADFA>>;@E=;@67D93DF7@F735:7D
!7EE7
I3E ;@HA>H76 I;F: 3 83?;>K 5A@FD35F;@9 4GE;@7EE =@AI@ 3E !A@7E *A@
A>>AI;@9F:7I766;@9F:7KD7E;676;@3:AGE73F
.7EF$G>47DDK*FD77F
&@
$3D5:
F:7 A88EI7>5A?76F:73DD;H3>A8I:3FIAG>6FGD@AGFFA47
F:7;DA@>K5:;>634AKF:7K@3?76)3>B: 3DB7D
"@AI@4K:;E?;66>7@3?7:7
EB7@F :;E 8;DEF 675367 A8 >;87 ;@ F:7 :AGE7 A@ *AGF: AI7E 3@6 IAG>6 >3F7D
475A?7A@7A8 ADFA>>;@ER?AEFD7@AI@76@3F;H7EA@E
@
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31;2
@&5FA47D
)3>B:3@6$3G67 A88E75GD763
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31 ;2
+7>7B:A@7+7>79D3B:A?B3@K
5A>>797 EFG67@F4KF:7@3?7A8 H7D7FF7
*FA5=I7>> A55GB;76 F:7 E75A@63DK G@;F
+:7 +A>;H7DE 3BB73D FA :3H7 8;DEF
A55GB;76F:7:A?7;@F:773D>K
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
;2
A>AD36A*F3F77@EGE#;EF;@9E8AD GK3@67EE;7 D3:3? ADFA>>;@E&
O;E@7K>3@6RE$3;@*FD77F,*P
"%G?47D
.;@F7D
D38F )79;EFD3F;A@ )75AD6 )3>B: >97@7 A88 ADF A>>;@E &
*7BF7?47D
D38F)79;EFD3F;A@)75AD6)3>B: 3DB7D A88 A>>KIAA6
&5FA47D
;D7 @EGD3@57$3BEA8 ADFA>>;@E*3@4AD@$3BA?B3@K
ADFA>>;@E;FK;D75FAD;7E#;EF;@9E8AD
*
AI7E*F
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31 ;2
OAG@F7D35F;H797@FEP
!G@7
B
O!A@7E @67DEA@P
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
;2
,*7@EGE)75AD6E$34>7'73DEA@*@K67D#;@5A>@
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
;2
+:7:AGE7;E3>EA7>;9;4>78AD;FE3EEA5;3F;A@I;F: 3DB7D A88I:A>;H76F:7D7
8DA?
FA
3DB7D4793@:;E53D77D;@ F:7?;6
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
;2
/ ;1?:;@911@-:E;2@41-.;B1"-@5;:-8&135?@1>/>5@1>5-
>1-?;2?53:525/-:/1 %AFBB>;534>7
$1>5;0;2?53:525/-:/1 %AFBB>;534>7
1B18;2?53:525/-:/1 "-@5;:-8 %A '@-@1 %A ;/-8 %A
'@-@191:@;2?53:525/-:/13E76GBA@F:77JF7@E;H73D5:;H3>D7E73D5:3@68;7>6
6A5G?7@F3F;A@5A?B>7F768ADF:;EBDA<75FF:;EBDAB7DFKI3E8AG@6FA:3H7477@
67H7>AB76;@
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
;2
7J3?B>7EA8F:7 AGDECG3D7EFK>7;@ ADFA>>;@E
753GE7A8F:;EF:7BDAB7DFK
6A7E@AF5A@H7K3@367CG3F77@AG9:E7@E7A8;FEAD;9;@3>:;EFAD;53D5:;F75FGD7
3@6?3F7D;3>EFACG3>;8K3E7>;9;4>78ADF:7%) 'G@67DD;F7D;A@
+:7D7;E@A
;@6;53F;A@F:3F;F?;9:F477>;9;4>7G@67DD;F7D;A@
??1??91:@ ;2 45?@;>5/ <4E?5/-8 5:@13>5@E >18-@10 @; ?53:525/-:/1 +:7 4D;5=
AGDECG3D7EFK>7:AGE7A@F:;EBDAB7DFKI3E5A@EFDG5F76;@
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
;2
;@F79D;FK F:3F IAG>6 EGBBADF %) ' E;9@;8;53@57 ;@ D7>3F;A@ FA F:7 B7D;A6 8DA?
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
;2
*;F7#A53F;A@$3B
,* * ADFA>>;@E
R+ABA9D3B:;5(G36D3@9>7
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31 ;2
7D;3>*;F7;39D3?
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 40
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
;2
;EFAD;5':AFA9D3B:E
;EFAD;5-;7IA8F:7 AGE7
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31 ;2
;EFAD;5':AFA9D3B:E
;EFAD;5-;7IA8F:7 AGE7
ADFA>>;@E$GE7G?A8;E5AH7DK ;EFAD;5EE7EEADRE3D6
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 42
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31
;2
GDD7@F':AFA9D3B:E
35=A8F:7 AGE7-;7IFAF:7%ADF:I7EF
)73DA8F:7 AGE7-;7IFAF:7*AGF:I7EF
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 44
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
00>1??
*
AI7E*F
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD?
$-31 ;2
GDD7@F':AFA9D3B:E
3D397-;7IFAF:7%ADF:73EF
3D397-;7IFAF:7*AGF:I7EF
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 45
612 S Howes: Development Review 1
Maren Bzdek, Sr. Historic Preservation Planner
Landmark Preservation Commission, August 21, 2019
Area of Adjacency
2
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 4
Packet Pg. 46
On-Site Historic Resources
3
Anderson-Goff House
• Eligibility: Criterion C
• Carl Anderson, Maude
Anderson Goff, Ralph Goff
(Fort Collins Courier)
• Harper Goff (boyhood home)
• 1900: Duplex constructed
• 1900-1925: Period of Significance
• 1948: Garage, Rear Addition,
Stucco
Proposed Alterations
4
3.4.7 (D)(3) – Eligible Resources on
Site
Building Alterations (Residence):
• None
Building Alterations (Garage):
• Demolition
Site Alterations:
• 5-stall parking pad
• Courtyard area between structures
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 4
Packet Pg. 47
Preliminary Staff Findings
Alterations to Existing Structures/Site
Primary Residence (Duplex)
• Applicant proposes no changes - all SOI Standards met re: this building
Garage Demolition
• Garage constructed after period of significance
• Relative importance of structure impacts evaluation of compliance with SOI
Standards
Site Alterations
• Additional density, character change to site in the rear
5
Preliminary Staff Findings
6
Design Compatibility (3.4.7(E)
• All Standards in Table 1, Column A
required
• One does not apply (stepback)
• Highlights for discussion:
• Similarity of width/visibility of new
construction
• Stone veneer product
• Materiality in general
• Windows: improve compliance?
• Other?
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 4
Packet Pg. 48
612 S Howes: Development Review 7
Maren Bzdek, Sr. Historic Preservation Planner
Landmark Preservation Commission, August 21, 2019
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 4
Packet Pg. 49
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 1
STAFF REPORT August 21, 2019
Landmark Preservation Commission
PROJECT NAME
612 S HOWES – DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
STAFF
Maren Bzdek, Senior Historic Preservation Planner
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed duplex addition to a historic property, 612 S Howes (the Anderson-
Goff House, 1900). Site alterations would include a five-stall parking pad on
the alley side and a shared courtyard between the old and new residences.
The project would retain the existing residence without alterations and
demolish the detached 1948 garage.
APPLICANT: Stan Arnett, r4 Architects
OWNER: Center Green Properties, LLC
RECOMMENDATION: N/A
LPC’S ROLE: At this meeting, the Landmark Preservation Commission will provide comments to the applicant and
City staff regarding this project’s compliance with the standards in Fort Collins Land Use Code section 3.4.7. The
applicant will return for a recommendation to the decision maker from the Commission at a later date, after a
development application has been submitted to the City for review.
BACKGROUND: The applicant has completed a conceptual development review process with City staff and is
now seeking initial comments from the Commission regarding compliance with Land Use Code Section 3.4.7 for
the attached proposed plans. As part of the pre-submittal requirements for a development application, the
applicant ordered a third-party, intensive-level survey (attached) to provide an updated determination on the
property’s eligibility for Fort Collins landmark designation. The survey professional concluded that the property,
constructed in 1900, is eligible for designation as a landmark under Criterion (2), Persons/Groups, for its
association with the lives of several people important to the history of Fort Collins: siblings Carl and Maude
Anderson and Maude’s spouse, Ralph Goff, who all owned and managed the Fort Collins Courier; and Harper
Goff, designer of Disneyland’s Main Street USA attraction, who lived in the home in his youth. The property is
situated on a block that includes several other historic resources that are eligible for landmark designation.
PROPOSED DESIGN: Two-story duplex containing two two-bedroom units and a new parking pad
accommodating five spaces at the rear of the property on the alley. Primary building materials are wood lap siding,
wood board & batten siding, and a stone veneer product.
AREA OF ADJACENCY SUMMARY: The area of adjacency extends to an outer boundary that is 200 hundred
feet in all directions from the perimeter of the development site. Any lot or parcel of property is within the area of
adjacency if any portion of the lot or parcel crosses the 200-foot outer boundary.
According to the requirements in 3.4.7(B), staff has identified the following historic resources that meet the above
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 1
Staff Report - Revised 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-1
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 2
requirement and shall be used for the establishment of the Historic Influence Area, to which the standards in
3.4.7(E) apply.
• Historic Resources on the Development Site, Abutting, or Across a Side Alley:
• The Anderson-Goff House (1900; on development site, includes 1948 garage)
• 608 S Howes (abutting; eligible for landmark designation)
• Other Historic Resources within 200 feet:
• 620 S Howes, eligible for landmark designation
• 624 S Howes, eligible for landmark designation
• 629 S Howes, eligible for landmark designation
• Historic Influence Area: The historic influence area, within which the standards provided in LUC 3.4.7
apply, includes the entire development site.
REVIEW CRITERIA AND STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT:
Land Use Code (LUC) Section 3.4.7, Historic and Cultural Resources, contains the applicable standards for
new buildings, where designated or eligible historic landmarks or historic districts are part of the development site
or surrounding neighborhood context.
3.4.7(D): Treatment of Historic Resources on Development Sites – Design Review
The Commission will need to determine if the proposal complies with the relevant code section, 3.4.7(D)(3), which
requires the preservation and adaptive use of eligible resources on the development site, following the Secretary of
the Interior’s Standards to the maximum extent feasible.
There are two historic structures on the development site: the residence and a detached garage. The applicant
plans to retain the existing historic residence (1900) without any proposed exterior alterations.
The proposal calls for demolition of the detached garage (1948) to accommodate the new duplex and required
parking. The proposed demolition of a secondary structure is somewhat offset by the applicant’s plans to avoid
alterations to the primary residence and the fact that the garage was not constructed during the period of
significance for the property (1900-1919, the period of occupation for the Anderson and Goff residents). Staff
therefore finds that the garage demolition should be a secondary consideration relative to the treatment proposed
for the primary historic residence; the “TBD” notations below reflect the preliminary nature of this conclusion in
advance of the Commission’s discussion of the matter.
Applicable
Code
Standard
Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Standard
Met (Y/N)
SOI #1
A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires
minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial
relationships;
The proposal maintains the historic residential, multifamily use of the property
and preserves its most significant historic resource associated with its period of
significance, i.e. the primary residence. The automotive parking and access
space on the rear of property from the alley is maintained. It does create
changes to the spatial relationships on the site through densification and the loss
of the existing rear yard and garage. The relative importance of that secondary
structure should be established in the conceptual review in order to complete the
analysis of this standard.
TBD
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 1
Staff Report - Revised 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-2
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 3
SOI #2
The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal
of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships
that characterize a property will be avoided.
As with Standard #1, the proposed project is partially compliant with this
standard because it alters the spatial relationships of the site and includes the
demolition of the garage. The relative importance of that secondary structure
should be established in the conceptual review in order to complete the analysis
of this standard.
TBD
SOI #3
Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use.
Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding
conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be
undertaken.
The new construction and site alterations are clearly of their own time. The front
of the property along Howes continues to serve as a record of the 20th century
use of the site.
Y
SOI #4
Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right
will be retained and preserved.
The survey document treats the garage as a historic alteration to the property,
contemporaneous with the rear addition and the stucco alteration to the
residence. On the other hand, it was constructed after the period of significance
suggested by the survey, which would be the combined period of occupation by
the Anderson and Goff residents (1900 to 1919), and the property was
determined to only be eligible under Criterion 2, Persons/Groups. As such, staff
finds the loss of the garage is mitigated in this case. The relative importance of
that secondary structure should be established in the conceptual review in order
to complete the analysis of this standard.
TBD
SOI #5 Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples
of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.
As with Standards #1 and #2, the demolition of the garage does not meet this
requirement, but the preservation of the residence, with no proposed alterations,
clearly meets this standard. The relative importance of that secondary structure
should be established in the conceptual review in order to complete the analysis
of this standard.
TBD
SOI #6 Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the
severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new
feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible,
materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by
documentary and physical evidence.
N/A
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 1
Staff Report - Revised 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-3
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 4
SOI #7
Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the
gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will
not be used.
N/A
SOI #8
Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such
resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.
N/A
SOI #9
New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy
historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be
differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale,
and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its
environment.
The proposed demolition of the garage does not meet the first part of this
standard; the proposed new work is generally compatible with and differentiated
from the original building and is clearly new construction as a separate structure
on the site. The relative importance of that secondary structure should be
established in the conceptual review in order to complete the analysis of this
standard.
TBD
SOI #10
New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in
such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of
the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.
Again, this standard would be met without the proposed demolition of the
garage, so the finding will need to reflect the Commission’s conclusions about
the relative importance of that secondary structure to the site history as a whole.
TBD
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 1
Staff Report - Revised 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-4
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 5
3.4.7(E)(1): Design Requirements for a Proposed Development
Applicable
Code
Standard
Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Standard
Met (Y/N)
Massing
and
Building
Articulation
1. New construction shall be similar in width or, if larger, be articulated into
massing reflective of the mass and scale of historic resources on the
development site, abutting, or across a side alley.
The width of the original historic structure is 25 feet; the offset rear addition extends
the overall width of the ground floor to approximately 30 feet on the rear elevation.
The proposed building width is about 10 feet wider at 40 feet. The distance
between the two structures is 28’-10” which allows for a shared courtyard between
the buildings. The greater width of the new structure means that it is somewhat
visible from Howes Street, although the matching building heights help to reduce
the impact. From the less important alley view, it seems likely that the original
historic structure will be very difficult to see.
TBD
Massing
and
Building
Articulation
2. In all zone districts, stepbacks must be located on new buildings to create
gradual massing transitions at the same height or one story above the
height of historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a
side alley. Additionally, in the Downtown zone district, the widest portions
of stepbacks required in the Downtown zone district stepback standard
shall be on building portions closest to historic resources.
Because the building heights are the same, no stepback is required.
N/A
Building
Materials
3. The lower story facades until any stepback (required or otherwise) must be
constructed of authentic, durable, high quality materials (brick, stone,
glass, terra cotta, stucco (non EVIS), precast concrete, wood, cast iron,
architectural metal) installed to industry standards.
More information about the proposed stone product is required to evaluate how the
proposed material meets this standard.
In addition, upon further consultation with the City Attorney’s Office regarding
interpretation of the code, staff notes that that the materials requirements should
reference the structures at 608 and 612 S Howes as the primary points of
comparison because they are on or abutting the development site. 620 S Howes is
not a primary point of comparison within the area of adjacency.
TBD
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 1
Staff Report - Revised 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-5
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 6
Building
Materials
4. New construction shall reference one or more of the predominate
material(s) on historic resources on the development site, abutting, or
across a side alley, by using at least two of the following to select the
primary material(s) for any one to three story building on the lower story
facades until any stepbacks (required or otherwise): 1) type; 2) scale; 3)
color; 4) three-dimensionality; 5) pattern.
The applicant references the native sandstone on the lower story of 620 Howes as
the basis for the use of stone on the lower story of the new duplex. The applicant
notes that lap siding and vertical board and batten are used in secondary
structures at the rear of properties on the same block. Commission feedback on
these materials choices will be helpful; as noted above, the primary point of
comparison for the application of these standards should be the structures at 608
and 612 S Howes.
TBD
Façade
Details
5. Use at least one of the following: 1) similar window pattern; 2) similar
window proportion of height to width; 3) similar solid-to-void pattern as
found on historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a
side alley.
The predominate window proportions in the area of adjacency are vertically
oriented rectangular openings, mostly as single one-over-one windows with a few
pairs. While the window pattern and proportion of the windows used in the new
construction vary somewhat from their context, they maintain a similar solid-to-void
pattern with the exception of the side elevations. Staff suggests that the applicant
give more attention to meeting this standard in the next round to strengthen the
compliance with one or more of these standards.
TBD
Façade
Details
6. Use select horizontal or vertical reference lines or elements (such as
rooflines, cornices, and bell courses) to relate the new construction to
historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley.
Floor heights and roof heights are similar; the contemporary roofline is contrasting,
although with similar pitch. Any simple suggestions to increase compliance with
this standard would be helpful.
TBD
Visibility of
Historic
Features
New construction shall not cover or obscure character-defining architectural
elements, such as windows or primary design features of historic resources on
the development site, abutting, or across a side alley.
The position of the new construction on the site prevents visual impact on the
existing structure at the front of the lot. Visibility is greatly impacted from the less
important alley view, as noted above, but the visibility of the rear elevation and its
features is retained from the interior of the site.
Y
3.4.7(E)(3): Plan of Protection
A plan of protection will be required prior to the Landmark Preservation Commission providing a recommendation
to the decision maker regarding a development project. Staff will work with the applicant to add this to the review
packet for the next discussion with the Commission.
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 1
Staff Report - Revised 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-6
Agenda Item 2
Item 2, Page 7
ATTACHMENTS
1. Area of Adjacency Map
2. LPC Application
3. Architectural Inventory Form
4. Staff Presentation
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 1
Staff Report - Revised 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-7
612 S Howes: Development Review 1
Maren Bzdek, Sr. Historic Preservation Planner
Landmark Preservation Commission, August 21, 2019
Area of Adjacency Map
2
Legend
Development Site
Abutting
Within 200 Ft
Area of Adjacency
Boundary
1
2
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 2
Staff Presentation - Updated 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-8
On-Site Historic Resources
3
Anderson-Goff House
• Eligibility: Criterion 2 (Persons/Groups)
• Carl Anderson, Maude Anderson
Goff, Ralph Goff (Fort Collins
Courier)
• Harper Goff (Walt Disney designer)
• 1900: Duplex constructed
• 1900-1919: Period of Significance
• 1948: Garage, Rear Addition, Stucco
Proposed Alterations
4
3.4.7 (D)(3) – Eligible Resources on
Site
Building Alterations (Residence):
• None
Building Alterations (Garage):
• Demolition
Site Alterations:
• Duplex behind historic residence
• 5-stall parking pad
• Courtyard area between structures
3
4
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 2
Staff Presentation - Updated 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-9
Preliminary Staff Findings
Alterations to Existing Structures/Site
Primary Residence (Historic Duplex)
• No proposed changes - all SOI Standards met re: building alterations
Garage (Proposed Demolition)
• Garage constructed after period of significance
• Relative importance of structure impacts evaluation of compliance with SOI Standards
Site Alterations
• Additional density, character change to site in the rear
5
Preliminary Staff Findings
6
Design Compatibility (3.4.7(E)
• All Standards in Table 1, Column A required
• One does not apply (stepback)
• Highlights for discussion:
• Similarity of width/visibility of new
construction
• Stone veneer product and its point of
comparison
• Materiality in general
• Windows: improve compliance?
• Other?
5
6
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 2
Staff Presentation - Updated 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-10
Other Items for Consideration
For the applicant:
• Review the Old Town Neighborhood Design Guidelines
• Consider the City’s Design Assistance Program
• Provide responses to questions about design decisions and material
choices
From staff:
• Area of Adjacency: prioritize on-site and abutting historic resources
• Rooftop deck/rear stairway of Anderson-Goff House: alteration not historic
7
612 S Howes: Development Review 8
Maren Bzdek, Sr. Historic Preservation Planner
Landmark Preservation Commission, August 21, 2019
7
8
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 2
Staff Presentation - Updated 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-11
0DVVLQJDQG%XLOGLQJ$UWLFXODWLRQ
7KHSURSRVHGQHZFRQVWUXFWLRQZLOOEHGHWDFKHGDQGVHWEDFNIURP
WKHH[LVWLQJVWUXFWXUH7KLVLVWRDOORZWKHVWUHHWYLHZIURP+RZHV
6WUHHWWRUHPDLQLQLWVFXUUHQWH[LVWLQJVWDWHZLWKPLQLPDOVLWHOLQHVRI
WKHQHZVWUXFWXUHRQWKHEDFNRIWKHORW
7KHEXLOGLQJVHWEDFNVZLOOEHPDLQWDLQHGRQWKHSURSRVHGVWUXFWXUH
%XLOGLQJKHLJKWVZLOOEHQHDUO\PDWFKHGWRWKHH[LVWLQJVWUXFWXUHIRU
FRQVLVWHQF\
7KHVHFRQGIORRUFDQWLOHYHUVRXWRYHUWKHJURXQGIORRUWRSURYLGH
VKHOWHUHGRSHQLQJVIRUWKHIURQWGRRUDQGEDFNSDWLRGRRUWRHDFKXQLW
ZLWKRXWWDFNHGRQFDQRSLHV
7KHFHQWHUSRUWLRQRIWKHEXLOGLQJKDVEHHQFUHDWHGWRYLVXDOO\
VHSDUDWHWKHOLYLQJXQLWVDQGGLUHFWUDLQZDWHUWRZDUGVWKHUHTXLUHGUDLQ
JDUGHQ7KHQRUWKDQGVRXWKURRIVORSHVDUHVLPSO\SXOOHGDSDUWE\WKH
PLGGOHURRIWRYLVXDOO\VSHDNWRWKHFRPPRQUHVLGHQWLDOURRIOLQHV
DORQJWKHSURSHUW\OLQHVDGMDFHQWWRWKHQHLJKERULQJUHVLGHQFHV
%XLOGLQJ0DWHULDOV
$WWKHORZHUVWRU\RIWKHSURSRVHGGXSOH[DVWRQHILQLVKKDVEHHQ
VHOHFWHGIRUDQDXWKHQWLFGXUDEOHILQLVKWKDWZLOOUHODWHWRWKH
QHLJKERUKRRG7KHKRPHORFDWHGDW6+RZHV6WLVDQH[DPSOH
RIVWRQHEHLQJXVHGIRUWKHHQWLUHJURXQGIORRU 6HHSKRWRRQVKHHW
$5&+
([LVWLQJVWRQHEDVHDOO
DURXQGJURXQGIORRUDW
6+RZHV6WUHHW
([LVWLQJGXSOH[DQG
DSSOLFDEOHSURMHFWVLWH
6+RZHV6WUHHW
([LVWLQJ6KHGDQG
DSSOLFDEOHSURMHFWVLWH
6+RZHV6WUHHW
6FDOH
3URMHFWQXPEHU
'DWH
'UDZQE\
&KHFNHGE\
$5&+,7(&76
30
$5&+
([LVWLQJ1HLJKERUKRRG3KRWRV
+RZHV
6+RZHV6WUHHW 6$
)RUW&ROOLQV&2
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
1HLJKERULQJ+RPHVRQ+RZHV6WUHHW 1HLJKERULQJ6WUXFWXUHVDW$OOH\ZD\
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 3
Applicant Response to LPC Requests
Added 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-13
6WRQH9HQHHU
0DQXI +RUL]RQ6WRQH
3URGXFW +DQGFUDIWHG6HULHV
&RORU &XPEHUODQG
+RUL]RQWDO6PRRWK/DS
6LGLQJ ([SRVXUH
0DQXI /3 /RXLVLDQD
3DFLILF
3URGXFW 6PRRWK6PDUW6LGH
/DS6LGLQJ
&RORU $QWLTXH:KLWH
6:
%RDUG %DWWHQ6LGLQJ6\VWHP
0DQXI /3 /RXLVLDQD
3DFLILF
3URGXFW 6PRRWK6PDUW6LGH
3DQHOVZ6PRRWK%DWWHQV
&RORU 6WDWXV%URQ]H
6:
$VSKDOW6KLQJOHV
0DQXI 7DPNR+HULWDJH
:RRGJDWH
3URGXFW \HDU+LJK
SURILOHVKDNHVW\OHVKLQJOH
&RORU :HDWKHUHG:RRG
6WDQGLQJ6HDP0HWDO5RRI
0DQXI %HUULGJH
3URGXFW 3UHILQLVKHG&HH
ORFNVWDQGLQJVHDPPHWDO
&RORU %URQ]H
6FDOH
3URMHFWQXPEHU
'DWH
'UDZQE\
&KHFNHGE\
$5&+,7(&76
30
$5&+
'9LHZVRI3URSRVHG
+RZHV
6+RZHV6WUHHW 6$
)RUW&ROOLQV&2
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
/3&:RUN6HVVLRQ&RPPHQWV
9LHZ)URP%DFN&RXUW\DUG
9LHZ)URP$OOH\ZD\
0DWHULDO/HJHQG
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 3
Applicant Response to LPC Requests
Added 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-14
)LUVW)ORRU3ODQ
5RRI%HDULQJ
6HFRQG)ORRU
%RDUG %DWWHQ:RRG
6LGLQJ3DLQWHG
6WDQGLQJ6HDP0HWDO5RRI
$VSKDOW6KLQJOH5RRI
:RRG/DS6LGLQJ3DLQWHG
6WRQH)LQLVK
)LUVW)ORRU3ODQ
5RRI%HDULQJ
6HFRQG)ORRU
)LUVW)ORRU3ODQ
5RRI%HDULQJ
6HFRQG)ORRU
3URSRVHG1HZ5HVLGHQWLDO 6KDUHG&RXUW\DUG ([LVWLQJ+RPH7R5HPDLQ$V,V
%RDUG %DWWHQ:RRG
6LGLQJ3DLQWHG
$VSKDOW6KLQJOH5RRI
:RRG/DS6LGLQJ3DLQWHG
6WRQH)LQLVK
([LVWLQJ6WXFFR)LQLVKWR
5HPDLQ
$OOH\ZD\ +RZHV6WUHHW
([LVWLQJ:RRG'HFN 6WDLUV
6FDOH
3URMHFWQXPEHU
'DWH
'UDZQE\
&KHFNHGE\
$5&+,7(&76
30
$5&+
([WHULRU(OHYDWLRQV
+RZHV
6+RZHV6WUHHW $XWKRU
)RUW&ROOLQV&2
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
/3&:RUN6HVVLRQ&RPPHQWV
%HQFK
%HQFK
%DFN3DWLR
(LYLQJ5RRPDW,Q.LWFKHQ /
3RZGHU%DWK
%DFN3DWLR
(LYLQJ5RRPDW,Q.LWFKHQ /
3RZGHU%DWK
&RYHUHG
0DLQ
(QWU\
&RYHUHG
0DLQ
(QWU\
83
83
%HGURRP1R %HGURRP1R
%DWK
/DXQGU\
'1
%HGURRP1R %HGURRP1R
%DWK
/DXQGU\
'1
6FDOH
3URMHFWQXPEHU
'DWH
'UDZQE\
&KHFNHGE\
$5&+,7(&76
30
$5&+
)ORRU3ODQV
+RZHV
6+RZHV6WUHHW 6$
)RUW&ROOLQV&2
83
83
([LVWLQJ3DYHG$OOH\ZD\
6+RZHV6WUHHW
3DUNLQJ5HT
VLQ72'
2QH
612 S. Howes St.
The Anderson‐Goff House 1900
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 4
Applicant Presentation - Submitted at Hearing
Packet Pg. 49-18
Proposed Site Plan Molly: large tree in rear – keeping?
Meg: parking –requirements and how they are impacting the design?
Mollie: Front doors face parking lot; where is the front door; how will the
site be used, fencelines?
Ann: Courtyard – plans –how they tie together
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 4
Applicant Presentation - Submitted at Hearing
Packet Pg. 49-19
Land Use Code
3.4.7(E)(1)
Massing &
Building
Articulation
The proposed new construction will be detached and set back
from the existing structure. This is to allow the street view from
Howes Street to remain in its current existing state with minimal
site lines of the new structure on the back of the lot.
The building setbacks will be maintained on the proposed
structure. Building heights will be nearly matched to the existing
structure for consistency.
The second floor cantilevers out over the ground floor to provide
sheltered openings for the front door and back patio door to each
unit without tacked on canopies.
The center portion of the building has been created to visually
separate the living units and direct rain water towards the
required rain garden. The north and south roof slopes are simply
pulled apart by the middle roof to visually speak to the common
residential roof lines along the property lines adjacent to the
neighboring residences.
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 4
Applicant Presentation - Submitted at Hearing
Packet Pg. 49-20
Proposed Detached Duplex
Meg: why the overhangs on the front and back?
Mike: rationale for use of materials – juxtaposition
Meg: question about material change in the central portion –why the change?
Katie: why the reason for the three slopes on the roof?
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 4
Applicant Presentation - Submitted at Hearing
Packet Pg. 49-21
Proposed Detached Duplex
North Elevation
Mike: why no windows
on north/south
elevations
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 4
Applicant Presentation - Submitted at Hearing
Packet Pg. 49-22
Land Use Code
3.4.7(E)(1)
Building
Materials
At the lower story of the proposed duplex a stone finish has been
selected for an authentic durable finish that will relate to the
neighborhood. The home located at 620 S. Howes St. is an
example of stone being used for the entire ground floor (See
photo on sheet ARCH‐2). A commercial building on W. Myrtle St.
that is just north along the alleyway adjacent to the proposed
project. Windows and doors with glass will be included within the
field of stone for natural daylighting, egress and to aid in the
overall massing.
Stone has been selected to reference the historic materials used
for foundations in the neighborhood including color and scale of
the stone. Additionally lap siding and board & batten siding has
been selected to reference the construction of detached garages
found along the back alleyway. The design uses the lap siding to
provide a sense of identity to each half of the duplex and aid in the
overall massing structure.
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 4
Applicant Presentation - Submitted at Hearing
Packet Pg. 49-23
Building Materials
3D View from Alleyway
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 4
Applicant Presentation - Submitted at Hearing
Packet Pg. 49-24
Neighboring Homes
West Elevation (Howes St.)
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 4
Applicant Presentation - Submitted at Hearing
Packet Pg. 49-25
Neighboring
Business
Alleyway Entry
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 4
Applicant Presentation - Submitted at Hearing
Packet Pg. 49-26
Land Use Code
3.4.7(E)(1)
Façade Details
Windows on the existing homes in the neighborhood vary in
proportion, scale and style. The intent is to use window sizes and
proportions that are similar to the adjacent homes to the
proposed project.
In the massing of the project the transition from the base stone
material to the siding at the second floor is based on the soffit
heights on the existing structure and the adjacent homes on each
side. The upper soffit has been designed to align with the existing
structure as well with similar overhang depths.
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 4
Applicant Presentation - Submitted at Hearing
Packet Pg. 49-27
Land Use Code
3.4.7(E)(1)
Visibility of
Historic
Features
The proposed new construction will be detached and set back from
the existing structure to maintain the integrity of the existing home.
This is to allow the street view from Howes Street to remain in its
current existing state with minimal site lines of the new structure on
the back of the lot.
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 4
Applicant Presentation - Submitted at Hearing
Packet Pg. 49-28
Thank you
Stan Arnett
r4 Architects, Inc.
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 4
Applicant Presentation - Submitted at Hearing
Packet Pg. 49-29
Agenda Item 3
Item 3, Page 1
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY August 21, 2019
Landmarks Preservation Commission
AGENDA ITEM NAME
220 EAST LAUREL STREET – APPEAL OF STAFF DESIGN REVIEW DECISION
STAFF
Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Division Manager
Brad Yatabe, Assistant City Attorney
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for consideration of an appeal of Staff’s decision to deny a
Certificate of Appropriateness for proposed alterations to the Long Apartment
Complex, 220 East Laurel Street. The property is an officially designated Fort
Collins Landmark.
APPLICANT/OWNER: Annie Obermann, Forge and Bow Dwellings, for D.L. Obermann Trust, Owner.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of a Certificate of Appropriateness for replacing the
windows and door, and for removal of historic landscape; approval of rear
courtyard landscaping; and tabling the fence and dumpster screen until more
information is provided.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this item is to consider an appeal of the Historic Preservation Manager’s (the “staff”) decision
made on July 2, 2019, finding that several of the proposed alterations to the property at 220 East Laurel Street
do not comply with Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV, as required, and to deny a Certificate of
Appropriateness for those items.
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
The Long Apartments at 220 East Laurel Street were constructed by Ora Long in the summer of 1922, at an
estimated cost of $24,000. Long and his family moved to Fort Collins in 1901, finding work as a carpenter and
building contractor, and served for a time as City Building Inspector. When the Long Apartment building was
constructed, each of its 14 apartments had four rooms and a bath and were described in the Fort Collins
Express as “thoroughly modern.” The apartment building is a rectangular, three-story-with-garden-level
structure constructed of red brick with contrasting tan brick trim. A seven-bay garage of matching brick was
constructed in 1926 by Fishback and McHugh. According to Larimer County Assessor’s records, sometime
between 1949 and 1951 a one-story flat roof addition was constructed, connecting the apartment building to
the garage. Consistent with its period of construction, the historic addition consists of an unpainted red brick
front elevation and a concrete block rear elevation, painted tan. A single person door with small diamond
shaped lite, and a horizontal fixed-pane window flanked by matching 1 over 1 windows with a sandstone sill,
are located on the front. A glass block window is located on the rear (courtyard) elevation.
In late 1996, an application for Landmark designation of the Long Apartment Complex was submitted by the
owners of the property, Sonia and Howard Nornes and Richard and Eleanor Anderson. On January 14, 1997,
the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) determined that the Long Apartment Complex has significance
to the community for its architectural importance and adopted a resolution to Council recommending that the
property be designation as a Fort Collins Landmark. Council held hearings on February 4, 1997 and February
18, 1997, to consider the owners’ request for such designation, and on February 18, 1997 unanimously
Packet Pg. 50
Agenda Item 3
Item 3, Page 2
adopted Ordinance No. 27, 1997, officially designating the property as a Landmark. Council’s Agenda Item
Summary for the designation of this property specifically identified the one-story addition and the seven-bay
garage structure as being included in the designation, along with the apartment building.
On June 26, 2019, a design review application was submitted by Annie Obermann, Forge and Bow Dwellings,
acting on behalf of the current property owner, D.L. Obermann Trust. A revised version of this application was
submitted the following day, June 27, 2019. On July 2, 2019, staff conducted a review of the proposed work for
compliance with the City’s adopted standards for alteration to Landmark properties, which include the
Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Staff informed the applicant of its decisions on July 3,
2019 via email, and formal notice of staff’s decisions was mailed on July 5, 2019. On July 18, 2019, the
owner’s representative filed a notice of appeal of staff’s decisions.
Specifically, staff denied the request for replacement of the historic window and door; denied the request to
paint the unpainted brick; and denied the request to substantially change and modernize the front and side
landscaping. Staff’s denial of this work is based on the findings that the proposed work does not comply with
the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, found in Municipal Code Chapter 14, Section 14-
53(b)(1). As a result, there is no basis in the code for a finding of approval. Staff approved the request to
change the landscape in the rear courtyard area, finding that the proposed work for this location does met the
Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Finally, Staff determined that it had insufficient
information to render a decision on the proposed cedar fence and trash dumpster screen.
PROCESS AND STANDARDS FOR REVIEW
Chapter 14, Article IV of the Municipal Code provides the process for reviewing proposed alterations and
changes to properties that have been officially designated as Landmarks, including applications for (1)
Alteration of any land surface, including the addition or removal of any improvement to or from any land
surface, that is within or part of any designated resource; and/or (2) Exterior alterations, including windows or
siding replacement, or partial or total demolition of any designated resource. [(14-51)(b)].
Section 14-53(b)(1) identifies the Standards for review, which for this property are the Secretary of the
Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The relevant treatment for this application is the
Rehabilitation treatment which contains ten (10) Standards, of which all applicable Standards must be met.
To understand how each of the ten Secretary of the Interior’s Standard’s for Rehabilitation work together, it is
important to review the explanatory text found in “The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of
Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic
Buildings.” The document, which was provided to the applicant, presents a clear hierarchy of priorities as follows:
1) identify, retain, and preserve the historic materials and features of a building and its historic setting; 2) protect
and maintain those materials and features, 3) repair those materials and features when the physical condition
warrants it; and finally, 4) replace deteriorated historic materials and features only when “the level of deterioration
or damage of materials precludes repair” (see “Introduction” section, page 77).
PROPOSED WORK FOR WHICH APPLICANT IS SEEKING A REPORT OF ACCEPTABILITY:
1. Replace the historic window on the front elevation of the wing with a new window and door from the
Pella Architects line, with matching divides, and presumably of wood, for efficiency and operability.
Staff finds that this request does not meet the Secretary of the Interior’s (SOTI) Standard #2, which requires
that distinctive materials and features not be removed or altered without sufficient cause; Standard #6, which
requires that deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced; and Standard #5, which is
unambiguous in regard to retention of historic materials, stating that distinctive character-defining features,
including their materials and construction techniques, “will be preserved.” The applicants have not offered any
evidence that the windows cannot be repaired, and the operability of the windows cannot be restored. Staff
notes that energy efficiency can be substantially increased by proper installation of the window; through added
insultation around the window; and by an interior window insert or storm. All of these have the benefit of
increased sustainability in terms of energy efficiency, retaining embodied energy, and by not adding to the
waste stream.
Packet Pg. 51
Agenda Item 3
Item 3, Page 3
2. Replacement of the historic door; the materials and design of the replacement door is not provided.
The applicants are proposing to replace the door for efficiency.
Staff finds that this request does not meet the Secretary of the Interior’s (SOTI) Standard #2, which requires
that distinctive materials and features not be removed or altered without sufficient cause; Standard #6, which
requires that deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced; and Standard #5, which is
unambiguous in regard to retention of historic materials, stating that distinctive character-defining features,
including their materials and construction techniques, “will be preserved.” The applicants have not offered any
evidence that the condition of the door is such that is requires replacement, or that energy efficiency cannot be
increased through other means, such as by insulation and weather stripping.
3. Paint the unpainted historic red brick on the front of the wing white.
This does not meet the SOTI Standards 4, as it does not respect the historical significance of the wing
addition; Standard #7, as it would introduce a treatment that can cause damage to the brick; Standard #5, by
changing the distinctive finish of the unpainted brick, altering the character of the apartment complex which is
defined by the red, unpainted brick; and Standard #10, as the paint cannot be removed in the future without
some impairment of the historic brick.
4. Change the existing landscape on the Laurel Street and Mathews Street elevations by removing
sections of turf and introducing new plantings and hardscape features.
The historic landscape of the Laurel Street and Mathews Street elevations is planted grass lawn, consistent
with the property’s historic landscape as shown in the historic photographs. Low brick planters project out from
building on either side of the entry. The removal of areas of turf grass and the introduction of new hardscape
features on these elevations does not meet SOTI Standard #2, as it would noticeably change the character of
the property through the removal of distinctive landscape materials and features, which the Standard requires
to be retained and preserved. A more minimalist adaptation that retains the historic landscape character while
addressing the applicant’s concern regarding irrigation near the foundation could be consistent with the
Standards and could be considered.
5. Change the landscape in the rear courtyard, behind the addition, with plantings and hardscape.
The landscape area behind the addition is a mix of dirt, overgrown plantings laid out in no discernable pattern,
and at least one non-historic planting box. There is no historic landscape character or pattern discernable in
the courtyard, and for this reason, staff finds that these changes would not change the historic character and
so would meet SOTI Standard 2.
6. A cedar fence is proposed to be installed on the north side of the lot;
The details of the fence are unknown. Additional information is required in order to evaluate this request.
7. A screen is proposed to cover the dumpsters.
The details of the dumpster screen are unknown. Additional information is required in order to evaluate this
request.
STAFF EVALUATION OF REVIEW CRITERIA:
Secretary of the Interior Standards
Applicable
Code
Standard
Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Does
Work
Meet
Standard?
SOI #1 A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires
minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships;
The building retains its historic use as a multi-family building.
YES
Packet Pg. 52
Agenda Item 3
Item 3, Page 4
SOI #2 The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of
distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that
characterize a property will be avoided.
Staff finds that while the use itself requires minimal change, the proposed work to
replace the historic window and door, paint unpainted brick, and significantly alter
the landscape on the south and east elevations, would alter distinctive features and
spaces that characterize the property. Further, there is no compelling reason for the
alteration of these materials and features, as their alteration or replacement is not
required to meet any codes.
NO
SOI #3 Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use.
Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding
conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be
undertaken.
Staff finds that this Standard is not applicable.
N/A
SOI #4 Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will
be retained and preserved.
Staff finds that the proposed changes would not retain materials and features of
the property that have acquired historic significance in their own right.
NO
SOI #5 Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of
craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.
Staff finds that the proposed work does not meet this standard, which is
unambiguous in regard to retention of historic materials, stating that distinctive
character-defining features, including their materials and construction techniques,
“will be preserved.” The applicant’s proposal to change the window and door, and
to paint the brick, do not preserve the property’s distinctive materials and finishes,
and not required to meet code.
NO
SOI #6 Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the
severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature
will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials.
Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical
evidence.
Staff finds that the proposal to replace the historic window and door rather than to
repair and restore or rehabilitate the window and door does not meet this standard.
The central idea in Standard 6 is similar to the previous standard, stating that distincti
features “will be repaired rather than replaced.” In addition, it provides requirements
for replacement when damage precludes the possibility of repair. In such cases, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate that severity of deterioration “requires
replacement,” which means that there is no option for repair. Staff cannot find a
basis for claiming that the Standard would be met.
NO
Packet Pg. 53
Agenda Item 3
Item 3, Page 5
SOI #7 Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest
means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used.
Staff finds that painting the brick would not meet this Standard, resulting in a
treatment that has been demonstrated to result in damage to the brick over time.
NO
SOI #8 Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources
must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.
Staff finds that this Standard is not relevant for the current application.
N/A
SOI #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy
historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated
from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural
features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment.
Staff finds that the proposed exterior alterations would destroy historic materials
and features, in this case the historic landscape on street-facing elevations, that
characterize the property.
NO
SOI #10 New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a
manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic
property and its environment would be unimpaired.
Staff finds that this Standard would not be met, as the proposed work to paint the
brick cannot be removed in the future without impairing the historic brick.
NO
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Landmark Preservation Commission deny the appeal regarding the application to
replace the historic window and door, paint brick, and change the south and east landscaping at the Long
Apartments, 220 East Laurel Street, based on the following findings of fact:
• The proposed work does not comply with Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV, because it fails to
satisfy all of the applicable Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, as required.
Specifically, the proposed work fails to meet Standards 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10.
• Because the proposed work does not meet the requirements of the Municipal Code, there is no basis
for approval.
Staff recommends approval of the application to change the landscaping in the rear courtyard behind the
addition, based on the following findings of fact:
• The proposed work complies with Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV, because it satisfies all
applicable Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, as required.
Staff recommends tabling the request for adding a fence and dumpster screen for more information.
Packet Pg. 54
Agenda Item 3
Item 3, Page 6
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Landmark Designation
3. Design Review Application
4. Staff’s Design Review Report, Findings, and Letter
5. Appeal
6. Assessor’s Cards
7. Photographs
8. Staff Presentation – Revised 8-20-19
9. Architectural Inventory Form
10. LPC Requests – Added 8-20-19
11. Updated Landscape Plans – Added 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 55
LOCATION MAP
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1
Packet Pg. 56
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 57
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 58
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 59
' "* +! &# ($$ ( #"4")!=
*&( $'(>-&'( ) "#+"&' $ '&'(#&( "(& #&#( ) "0#)' "#" $ " ('
#& " '(#& ' " "+ !#&" . "(
#(#"#2?3@6 #'5)$#, '( "
#& " + "#+'"' 8& 9
#(#"#2A3B6 #'5)$#, '( "
( #"+ "#+"' 8 '(#"9
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 61
#(#"#2C6, '( " ( #""(&-
##&
#)( *(&+ "1, '( "' ." #( #"+ ! "( "2
++ "#+(#&$ ')'(#!
+ "#+"!( , '( " * '2 "#+F##& '&#! & ((' "2 *"#(#!$ (
" "& "#&+ "#+"$&&"#((#)"( #"$( '"$$&#*2
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 62
"'$2
( '#)& "("( #"(# ")$( #*& '( ( #( ,(& #& "'$2
( '
)&&"( -*&-' /#& "! " ! #)(##&" "!"(/$& *-/#&#!!)"
"#)&!"(#&(""('2 +"&' $'# '(#&$ &"" ")&&"(#" ( #"''#
( (( ) "'#)"( #" '$&#((&#! && ( #"#*&'$&-"(#"#)&
#!!)" (-* '#( ((""('&"#)&(#* #$& ( #"' $'"" #&+ 2
#$(#
" )1
• )()&( (#!'(##)"( #"/- "&"'&#)"$& !(&#
#)"( #"2
•
+*(( #"(# "+'2
• $* "'-'(!! ,+ ( ()&"(#$&#* ((&#""( #"&#!) "#& " (#
( #"+ + (""( ("''&##!2
• ) '&"(##*&)!$'(&8 #( #"""#(!#*)(#
#(#=?8 (96
$ (3
)"+$(&"
#,'
#(#=@8& (9
, '( "()&#!'
( +-(#
#)"( #"2
&& ( #" '"#+
#*&'$&- "#"
#)"( #"2)' "
#"&"#&&#' #"2
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 64
+&#$#'
"'$$ "2
"#" )' #"/+ #$( (( + '#)( "("( #"(# #"#&( '(#& ' " "#( ) "
+ '( )$( """ " " ( (2)&# "# "'#+#) (#$&#* ((&"!#&
#!$( ( *!" ( '#&#)&(""('+ "#)& "( #) () ' ""#!!)" (-" (2#)"
"'$ &( #" "( "&" &!# 2 ' '",!$ #( ),($#' ( #"# '(#& "#"(!$#&&-2
( ! #+2 '& +' (#')&$$&#* &#!( #&(# "' "!& &'&*( #"#!! ((8 9
"( $ "" "$&(!"(7'+ ')" "#&&"('#+"(#+"* #$!"()( #& (-2 ')( )
#"#&( $'(+ #+ "'$#&"" "2
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 65
July 2, 2019 Staff Review, 220 East Laurel Street, Page 1
STAFF REPORT July 2, 2019
PROJECT NAME
220 EAST LAUREL STREET, LONG APARTMENTS – DESIGN REVIEW
STAFF
Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Manager
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for design review of replacement of a historic window and
door in the wing at the Long Apartments, 220 East Laurel Street; to paint the
wing’s unpainted brick white; to change the landscape; and to add a dumpster
cover and a cedar fence. The property is a designated Fort Collins Landmark.
The wing addition has previous also been addressed as 218 East Laurel Street.
OWNER/APPLICANT: D.L. Obermann Trust c/o Forge and Bow Dwellings/Annie Obermann
RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information provided by the applicant, staff denies the request for
replacement of the window and door; denies the request to paint the brick;
denies the request to change the front and side landscaping; approves the
request to change the landscape in the courtyard area; and has insufficient
information to render a decision on the proposed cedar fence and trash
dumpster screen.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Long Apartments at 220 East Laurel Street were designated as a Fort Collins Landmark by Council ordinance
No. 27, 1997, for its architectural importance. The Landmark designation of the property includes the full extent
of the property, with the garage and wing addition specifically called out for inclusion.
The applicant is requesting approval to replace a historic window and a historic door on the front elevation of the
wing, as well as to paint the historic brick. The wing was constructed between 1948 and the mid-1960s, based
upon Larimer County Tax Assessor’s photos. The applicants are proposing to replace the window and door for
efficiency, with a new window and door from the Pella Architects line, with matching divides; the material,
although not specified is presumed to be wood. The design of the replacement door is not provided; again, the
material is presumed to be wood. The historic landscape of the Laurel Street and Mathews Street elevations is
planted grass lawn; the applicants are proposing to change the existing landscape by introducing new plantings
and hardscape features on these elevations.
Additionally, the applicant is proposing to install a cedar fence on the north side of the lot; and to add a screen to
cover the dumpsters. The details of the fence and dumpster screen are unknown.
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4
Packet Pg. 66
July 2, 2019 Staff Review, 220 East Laurel Street, Page 2
The applicants are proposing to change the landscape of the rear courtyard, behind the wing, by adding plantings
and hardscape. This landscape area currently is a mix of dirt, overgrown plantings, and at least one planting box.
Unlike the Laurel and Mathews Street elevations, there is no historic landscape character or pattern discernable
in the courtyard.
STAFF’S ROLE
Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV, Section 14-53 and 14-54, upon receipt of a completed
application, staff may review the application, or may refer the application to the Landmark Preservation
Commission for review. The staff, or if referred, the Commission, shall determine if the proposed alteration
meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and any applicable
City standards adopted by ordinance for historic reviews.
BACKGROUND
The Long Apartments were constructed by Ora Long in the summer of 1922, at an estimated cost of $24,000.
Long and his family moved to Fort Collins in 1901, finding work as a carpenter and building contractor, and served
for a time as City Building Inspector. When the Long Apartment building was constructed, each of its 14
apartments had four rooms and bath, and it was described in the Fort Collins Express at the time as “thoroughly
modern.” The apartment building is a rectangular, three-story-with-garden-level structure, constructed of red
brick with contrasting tan brick trim. A seven-bay garage of matching brick was constructed in 1926 by Fishback
and McHugh. Between 1949 and 1969, a one-story flat roof addition (the “wing”) was constructed, connecting
the apartment building to the garage.
Consistent with its period of construction, the historic wing consists of unpainted red brick front elevation, and a
concrete block rear elevation, painted tan. A single person door with small diamond shaped lite, and a horizontal
fixed-pane window flanked by matching 1 over 1 windows with a sandstone sill, are located on the front of the
wing. A glass block window is located on the rear (courtyard) elevation of the wing.
PROPOSED WORK FOR WHICH THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A REPORT OF ACCEPTABILITY:
1. The applicant is requesting approval to replace the historic window on the front elevation of the wing,
with a new window and door from the Pella Architects line, with matching divides, and presumably of
wood, for efficiency and operability.
Staff finds that this request does not meet the Secretary of the Interior’s (SOTI) Standard #2, which
requires that distinctive materials and features not be removed or altered without sufficient cause;
Standard #6, which requires that deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced; and
Standard #5, which is unambiguous in regard to retention of historic materials, stating that distinctive
character-defining features, including their materials and construction techniques, “will be preserved.”
The applicants have not offered any evidence that the windows cannot be repaired, and the operability
of the windows cannot be restored. Staff notes that energy efficiency can be substantially increased by
proper installation of the window; through added insultation around the window; and by an interior
window insert or storm. All of these have the benefit of increased sustainability in terms of energy
efficiency, retaining embodied energy, and by not adding to the waste stream.
2. Similarly, the applicant is requesting replacement of the historic door; the materials and design of the
replacement door is not provided; the materials are proposed to be wood. The applicants are
proposing to replace the door for efficiency.
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4
Packet Pg. 67
July 2, 2019 Staff Review, 220 East Laurel Street, Page 3
Staff finds that this request does not meet the Secretary of the Interior’s (SOTI) Standard #2, which
requires that distinctive materials and features not be removed or altered without sufficient cause;
Standard #6, which requires that deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced; and
Standard #5, which is unambiguous in regard to retention of historic materials, stating that distinctive
character-defining features, including their materials and construction techniques, “will be preserved.”
The applicants have not offered any evidence that the condition of the door is such that is requires
replacement, or that energy efficiency cannot be increased through other means, such as by insulation
and weather stripping.
3. Another request is to paint the unpainted historic red brick on the front of the wing white.
This does not meet the SOTI Standards 4, as it does not respect the historical significance of the wing
addition; Standard #7, as it would introduce a treatment that can cause damage to the brick; Standard
#5, by changing the distinctive finish of the unpainted red brick, altering the character of the apartment
complex; and Standard #10, as the paint cannot be removed in the future without some impairment of
the historic brick.
4. A cedar fence is proposed to be installed on the north side of the lot;
Additional information is required on the design and location of the fence in order for staff to evaluate
this request.
5. The existing landscape on the Laurel Street and Mathews Street elevations is proposed to be changed
by removing sections of turf and introducing new plantings and hardscape features.
The historic landscape of the Laurel Street and Mathews Street elevations is planted grass lawn. The
removal of areas of turf grass and the introduction of hardscape features on these elevations does not
meet SOTI Standard #2, as it would noticeably change the historic character of the property, which the
Standard requires to be retained and preserved.
The applicant notes that the grass is planted right up to the foundation of the building in several
locations. A plan to pull the turf back by a short distance, and potentially add narrow planting beds,
would be a minor change to the historic pattern, and would likely be found to comply with the Standards.
6. Additionally, the applicants are proposing to change the landscape in the rear courtyard, behind the
wing, with plantings and hardscape.
The landscape area behind the wing is a mix of overgrown plantings, dirt and at least one planting box.
There is no historic landscape character or pattern discernable in the courtyard, and for this reason, staff
finds that these changes would not change the historic character and so would meet SOTI Standard 2.
7. A screen is proposed to cover the dumpsters.
The details of the dumpster screen are unknown, and this request cannot be evaluated.
STAFF EVALUATION OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:
Secretary of the Interior Standards
Applicable
Code
Standard
Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Does
Work
Meet
Standard?
SOI #1
A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires
minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships;
The building retains its historic use as a multi-family building.
YES
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4
Packet Pg. 68
July 2, 2019 Staff Review, 220 East Laurel Street, Page 4
SOI #2
The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of
distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that
characterize a property will be avoided.
Staff finds that while the use itself requires minimal change, the proposed work to
replace the historic window and door, paint unpainted brick, and significantly alter
the landscape on the south and east elevations, would notably alter distinctive
features and spaces that characterize the property.
NO
SOI #3
Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use.
Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding
conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be
undertaken.
Staff finds that this Standard is not applicable.
N/A
SOI #4
Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will
be retained and preserved.
Staff finds that the proposed changes would not retain materials and features of
the property that have acquired historic significance in their own right.
NO
SOI #5 Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of
craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.
Staff finds that the proposed work does not meet this standard, which is
unambiguous in regard to retention of historic materials, stating that distinctive
character-defining features, including their materials and construction techniques,
“will be preserved.” The applicant’s proposal to change the window and door, and
to paint the brick, do not preserve the property’s distinctive materials and finishes.
NO
SOI #6 Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the
severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature
will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials.
Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical
evidence.
Staff finds that the proposal to replace the historic window and door rather than repa
and restore or rehabilitate the window and door does not meet this standard. The
central and unambiguous idea in Standard 6 is similar to the previous standard, statin
that distinctive features “will be repaired rather than replaced.” In addition, it provide
requirements for replacement when damage precludes the possibility of repair. In suc
cases, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate that severity of deterioration
“requires replacement,” which means that there is no option for repair. Staff cannot
find a basis for claiming that the Standard would be met.
NO
SOI #7
Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest
means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used.
Staff finds that painting the brick would not meet this Standard, resulting in a
treatment that has been demonstrated to result in damage to the brick over time.
NO
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4
Packet Pg. 69
July 2, 2019 Staff Review, 220 East Laurel Street, Page 5
SOI #8
Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources
must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.
Staff finds that this Standard is not relevant for the current application.
N/A
SOI #9
New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy
historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated
from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural
features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment.
Staff finds that the proposed exterior alterations would destroy historic materials
that characterize the property.
NO
SOI #10
New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a
manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic
property and its environment would be unimpaired.
Staff finds that this Standard would not be met, as the proposed work to paint the
brick cannot be removed in the future without impairing the historic brick.
NO
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION:
Staff denies the application to replace the historic window and door, paint brick, and change the south and east
landscaping at 220 East Laurel Street, based on the following findings of fact:
• The proposed work does not comply with Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV, because it fails to
satisfy all of the applicable Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, as required.
Specifically, the proposed work fails to meet Standards 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10.
• Because the proposed work does not meet the requirements of the Municipal Code, there is no basis
for approval.
Staff tables the request for adding a fence and dumpster screen for more information.
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4
Packet Pg. 70
Community Development & Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580
970.416.2740
970.224.6134- fax
fcgov.com
Planning, Development & Transportation
July 3, 2019
Ms. Annie Obermann
Forge and Bow Dwellings
116 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
Re: Review of Proposed Alterations to Long Apartments, 220 East Laurel Street
Dear Ms. Obermann,
This report is to inform you of the results of Historic Preservation staff’s review of your application for
alterations to the Long Apartments, 220 East Laurel. The property is a Fort Collins Landmark, designated
by Council Ordinance No. 27, 1997.
The alterations reviewed consisted of replacement of a historic window and door on the front elevation
of the wing connecting the apartments with the garages; painting the wing’s unpainted brick white;
changes to the front and rear landscape; and adding a dumpster screen and a cedar fence.
As more fully described in the accompanying report, staff’s review of the proposed work finds that most
of the alterations do not meet the standards provided for in Chapter 14, Section 14-53 of the Municipal
Code. Specifically, staff finds that the replacement of the historic window and door has not been
sufficiently justified, and does not meet the Secretary of the Interior’s (SOTI) Standards for
Rehabilitation Standards 2, 5, and 6; that painting the unpainted brick does not meet SOTI Standards 4,
7, and 10; and that the landscape changes proposed for the Laurel and Mathews Streets elevations does
not meet SOTI Standard #2. These requests, as presented, are denied.
Staff finds that the landscape changes proposed for the courtyard area behind the wing do meet the
SOTI Standards. These plans are approved.
Staff finds that it does not have sufficient information on the proposed fence and dumpster screen to
evaluate them, and these items are tabled for further information.
I have enclosed the staff report evaluating the proposed work, as well as a copy of your application. If
you have any questions regarding this review, I may be reached at kmcwilliams@fcgov.com, or at (970)
224-6078.
Sincerely,
Karen McWilliams
Historic Preservation Division Manager
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4
Packet Pg. 71
July 18th
, 2019
To Whom it my concern:
On July 5th
we were notified that our request for alterations to 220 E Laurel had been denied by staff. It is our
hope to proceed with these alterations and in such we are requesting to appeal the decision made on July 3rd
by the staff. In addition to this, per municipal- code Art III Sec. 14-39 we are also requesting to have the local
designation Amended or Rescinded from this property. It is not our intent to have this property classified as a
local historic landmark.
We plan to have a historical survey preformed per the requirements of the Municipal code Art II Sec. 14-23
Thank you and please reach out with any concerns regarding the proceedings on August 21st
2019.
Annie Obermann
116 N College Ave Suite no. 5
Fort Collins CO 80524
970.402.5694
annie@forgeandbow.com
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 5
Packet Pg. 72
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6
Packet Pg. 73
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6
Packet Pg. 74
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6
Packet Pg. 75
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6
Packet Pg. 76
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6
Packet Pg. 77
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6
Packet Pg. 78
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6
Packet Pg. 79
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6
Packet Pg. 80
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6
Packet Pg. 81
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7
Packet Pg. 82
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7
Packet Pg. 83
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7
Packet Pg. 84
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7
Packet Pg. 85
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7
Packet Pg. 86
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7
Packet Pg. 87
March 1949
Jan 1970
1995
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7
Packet Pg. 88
1997 -
addition
front
1997
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7
Packet Pg. 89
1
Appeal of Staff Design Review
Long Apartment Complex, 220 East Laurel Street
Landmark Preservation Commission 8.21.2019
220 E. Laurel
Street
Location Map
2
1
2
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8
Staff Presentation - Revised 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 90
Historic Photographs
3
Mar. 1949 Jan. 1970
4
Dates of Construction:
Apartments – 1922
Addition – c.1951
3
4
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8
Staff Presentation - Revised 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 91
5
6
5
6
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8
Staff Presentation - Revised 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 92
7
8
7
8
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8
Staff Presentation - Revised 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 93
9
10
9
10
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8
Staff Presentation - Revised 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 94
11
1949
1970 1997
12
Proposed Landscape Plan
11
12
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8
Staff Presentation - Revised 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 95
13
Existing Landscape - Rear Courtyard
14
13
14
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8
Staff Presentation - Revised 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 96
Role of the Landmark Preservation Commission:
• In order to approve:
• Plans must be final
• All ten Secretary of the Interior Standards for
Rehabilitation are met
15
15
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8
Staff Presentation - Revised 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 96-1
/͘/ Ed/&/d/KE
ϭ͘ ZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞŶƵŵďĞƌ͗ϱ>Z͘Ϯϲϲϵ
Ϯ͘ dĞŵƉŽƌĂƌLJƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞŶƵŵďĞƌ͗Eͬ
ϯ͘ ŽƵŶƚLJ͗>ĂƌŝŵĞƌ
ϰ͘ ŝƚLJ͗ &ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ϱ͘ ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŶĂŵĞ͗>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ
ϲ͘ ƵƌƌĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŶĂŵĞ͗ >ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ
ϳ͘ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ŽůŽƌĂĚŽϴϬϱϮϰ
ϴ͘ KǁŶĞƌŶĂŵĞĂŶĚĂĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ ͘>͘KďĞƌŵĂŶŶ/ƌƌĞǀŽĐĂďůĞdƌƵƐƚ
ϱϯϯϮWĂƌĂĚŝƐĞ>ĂŶĞ
&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕KϴϬϱϮϲ
//͘' K'ZW,//E&KZDd/KE
ϵ͘ W͘D͘ϲƚŚdŽǁŶƐŚŝƉϳEZĂŶŐĞϲϵt
^ЪŽĨEtЬŽĨEtЬŽĨƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϯ
ϭϬ͘ hdDƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ
ŽŶĞϭϯ͖ϰϵϯϳϭϭŵ ͖ϰϰϵϭϵϰϮŵE
ϭϭ͘ h^'^ƋƵĂĚŶĂŵĞ͗&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕K
zĞĂƌ͗ϭϵϲϬ͖WŚŽƚŽƌĞǀŝƐĞĚϭϵϴϰDĂƉƐĐĂůĞ͗yϳ͘ϱΖϭϱΖ
ϭϮ͘ >Žƚ;ƐͿ͗^ŽƵƚŚϴϬĨĞĞƚŽĨ>Žƚϭ
ůŽĐŬ͗ϭϯϲ
WůĂƚ͗&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐWůĂƚƚĞĚ͗ϭϴϳϯ
WĂƌĐĞůEƵŵďĞƌ͗ϵϳϭϯϮͲϭϭͲϬϮϲ
ϭϯ͘ ŽƵŶĚĂƌLJĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶĂŶĚ:ƵƐƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ dŚĞ ƐŝƚĞďŽƵŶĚĂƌLJĐŽƌƌĞƐƉŽŶĚƐƚŽƚŚĞƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚůĞŐĂů
ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶͬƉĂƌĐĞůůŝŵŝƚƐŽĨ>ĂƌŝŵĞƌŽƵŶƚLJWĂƌĐĞůEŽ͘ϵϳϭϯϮͲϭϭͲϬϮϲ͕ǁŚŝĐŚŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞ
ŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚĂŶĚDĂƚƚŚĞǁƐ^ƚƌĞĞƚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƌĞĐƚĂŶŐƵůĂƌůŽƚ
ŝƐϭϰϬĨĞĞƚǁŝĚĞ;ŶŽƌƚŚͲƐŽƵƚŚͿĂŶĚϴϬĨĞĞƚĚĞĞƉ;ĞĂƐƚͲǁĞƐƚͿ͕ĞŶĐŽŵƉĂƐƐŝŶŐĂŶĂƌĞĂŽĨϭϭ͕ϮϬϬĨƚϸ
;Ϭ͘ϮϲĂĐƌĞͿ͘/ƚĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐƚŚĞŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͕ŝƚƐǁĞƐƚŽŶĞͲƐƚŽƌLJĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚ
ƉĞƌƉĞŶĚŝĐƵůĂƌ ϳͲďĂLJ ŐĂƌĂŐĞ͕ ĂƐ ǁĞůů ĂƐ ƚŚĞ ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͘ dŚĞ ƐŝƚĞ ďŽƵŶĚĂƌLJ
ĞŶĐŽŵƉĂƐƐĞƐƚŚĞĂƌĞĂĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝƚƐŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůƵƐĞ͘
///͘Z,/d dhZ> ^Z/Wd/KE
ϭϰ͘ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉůĂŶ;ĨŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚ͕ƐŚĂƉĞͿ͗ZĞĐƚĂŶŐƵůĂƌ;ŶĞĂƌůLJƐƋƵĂƌĞͿ
ϭϱ͘ ŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶƐŝŶĨĞĞƚ͗>ĞŶŐƚŚ͗ϱϰĨƚ͘; ͲtͿdžtŝĚƚŚ͗ϲϯĨƚ͘;EͲ^Ϳ
ϭϲ͘ EƵŵďĞƌŽĨƐƚŽƌŝĞƐ͗ϯ͘ϬнďĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ
ϭϳ͘ WƌŝŵĂƌLJĞdžƚĞƌŶĂůǁĂůůŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů;ƐͿ͗ƌŝĐŬ;ƌĞĚͿ
ϭϴ͘ ZŽŽĨĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶ͗&ůĂƚ
KĨĨŝĐŝĂůĞůŝŐŝďŝůŝƚLJĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ;K,WƵƐĞŽŶůLJͿ
ĂƚĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ /ŶŝƚŝĂůƐ
ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ
ͺͺͺͺͺͺĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚ ůŝŐŝďůĞͲEZ
ͺͺͺͺͺͺĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚEŽƚ ůŝŐŝďůĞͲEZ
ͺͺͺͺͺͺĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚ ůŝŐŝďůĞͲ^Z
ͺͺͺͺͺͺĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚEŽƚ ůŝŐŝďůĞͲ^Z
ͺͺͺͺͺͺEĞĞĚĂƚĂ
ͺͺͺͺͺͺŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚĞƐƚŽĞůŝŐŝďůĞEZŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ
ͺͺͺͺͺͺEŽŶĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŶŐƚŽĞůŝŐŝďůĞEZŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ
K,WϭϰϬϯ
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ϭϵ͘ WƌŝŵĂƌLJĞdžƚĞƌŶĂůƌŽŽĨŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗ƵŝůƚƵƉƌŽĐŬ
ϮϬ͘ ^ƉĞĐŝĂůĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͗WŽƌĐŚ
Ϯϭ͘ 'ĞŶĞƌĂů ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ͗dŚŝƐŶĞĂƌůLJĐƵďĞͲƐŚĂƉĞĚ͕ĨŽƵƌͲƐƚŽƌLJďƌŝĐŬƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů
ĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŚĂƐĂŶĞĂƌůLJƐƋƵĂƌĞĨŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚ;ϲϯĨĞĞƚǁŝĚĞdžϱϰĨĞĞƚĚĞĞƉͿĂŶĚƐŝƚƐĂďŽǀĞĂ
ĨƵůůďĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ͘dŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐϭϱĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐŽƌůŝǀŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐŽĐĐƵƉLJŝŶŐĂůůĨŽƵƌĨůŽŽƌƐ͘
hŶůŝŬĞƚŚĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚďƌŝĐŬ<ĞŶƐŝŶŐƚŽŶWůĂĐĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĚŝƐƉůĂLJƐ
ĂŶ ĂƵƐƚĞƌĞ ƵƚŝůŝƚĂƌŝĂŶ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ ǁŝƚŚ ůŝƚƚůĞ ŽƌŶĂŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ Žƌ ƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĂďůĞ ƐƚLJůŝƐƚŝĐ ĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘
ŝƐƚŝŶĐƚŝǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚƚƌŝďƵƚĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞŝƚƐĐƵďŝĐĨŽƌŵ͕ƌĞĚďƌŝĐŬǁĂůůƐ͕ƐLJŵŵĞƚƌŝĐĂůĨĞŶĞƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŽŶ
ƚŚĞĨĂĕĂĚĞĂŶĚƐŝĚĞĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂƌĞĐĞƐƐĞĚĂŶĚƐůŝŐŚƚůLJĞůĞǀĂƚĞĚĨƌŽŶƚĞŶƚƌLJǁŝƚŚĂĨůĂƚĐĂŶŽƉLJ
ĂŶĚĚĞĐŽƌĂƚŝǀĞƚŝůĞƐƚĞƉ͖ĂŶĚƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨĨůƵƐŚͲůĂŝĚĐŽŶƚƌĂƐƚŝŶŐLJĞůůŽǁŽƌďƵĨĨͲĐŽůŽƌĞĚďƌŝĐŬĂƐ
ƐŝŵƵůĂƚĞĚůŝŶƚĞůƐĂƚƚŚĞƚŽƉŽĨĞĂĐŚǁŝŶĚŽǁƵŶŝƚ͘ŶŽƚŚĞƌĚŝƐƚŝŶĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŝƚŝƐƚŚĞďƌĂƐƐͲƉůĂƚĞĚ;͍Ϳ
ƚŚƌĞĞͲĚŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶĂůŵĞƚĂůĐĂƉŝƚĂůůĞƚƚĞƌƐĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĐĞŶƚĞƌŽĨƚŚĞĨĂĕĂĚĞďĞůŽǁƚŚĞƌŽŽĨůŝŶĞ
ĂŶĚƐƉĞůůŝŶŐ͞>KE'͕͟ĂŶĂŵĞƐŝŐŶƚŚĂƚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐďŽƚŚƚŚĞŶĂŵĞŽĨƚŚĞĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂƐ
ǁĞůůĂƐŝƚƐŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůŽǁŶĞƌĂŶĚďƵŝůĚĞƌ͘
/ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽŵĂŝŶĞŶƚƌLJĐĞŶƚĞƌĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨĂĕĂĚĞͬƐŽƵƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƚŚĞƌĞŝƐĂƉůĂŝŶŐƌŽƵŶĚͲůĞǀĞů
ĞŶƚƌLJĚŽŽƌŽŶƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĂŵĞƚĂůĨŝƌĞĞƐĐĂƉĞůĂĚĚĞƌ͘
WůĞĂƐĞƌĞĨĞƌƚŽƚŚĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƉŚŽƚŽŐƌĂƉŚƐǁŚŝĐŚĚĞƉŝĐƚĂůůǀŝƐŝďůĞĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů
ĚĞƚĂŝůƐ͘
ϮϮ͘ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƐƚLJůĞͬďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƚLJƉĞ͗EŽ^ƚLJůĞͬZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůͲĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
Ϯϯ͘ >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ Žƌ ƐƉĞĐŝĂů ƐĞƚƚŝŶŐ ĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͗dŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝƐƐŝƚƵĂƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞ
ŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚĂŶĚDĂƚƚŚĞǁƐ^ƚƌĞĞƚŝŶĂŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůĂƌĞĂ͘/ƚŝƐ
ůŽĐĂƚĞĚũƵƐƚǁĞƐƚŽĨƚŚĞŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐ>ĂƵƌĞů^ĐŚŽŽů͕ĂŶĚĂůĂƌŐĞŵŽĚĞƌŶƐĐŚŽŽůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞ>ĂƵƌĞů
^ĐŚŽŽůĐĂŵƉƵƐƐŝƚƐĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ;DĂƚƚŚĞǁƐͿĞĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŝƐŽŶůLJĂ
ĐŽƵƉůĞŽĨďůŽĐŬƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚĞƌŶĞĚŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽůŽƌĂĚŽ^ƚĂƚĞhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJ;^hͿĐĂŵƉƵƐ͕
ĂŶĚŝƐŽŶĞŽĨƐĞǀĞƌĂůďƌŝĐŬĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĞƌĞĐƚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐĂƌĞĂŝŶƚŚĞϭϵϮϬƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂŶĚ
ƚŚĞ^ĐŽƚƚƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ;ϵϬϬ^ŽƵƚŚŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞ͕ďƵŝůƚĐ͘ϭϵϮϱͿ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚ<ĞŶƐŝŶŐƚŽŶ
WůĂĐĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ;ϮϬϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚͿ͕ďƵŝůƚĐ͘ϭϵϮϮͲϭϵϮϱ͘
dŚĞ ĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͛Ɛ ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚƐ ƉƌŝŵĂƌŝůLJ ŽĨ Ă ǁĞůůͲŵĂŶŝĐƵƌĞĚ ŐƌĂƐƐ ůĂǁŶ
ǁƌĂƉƉŝŶŐ ĂƌŽƵŶĚ ƚŚĞ ƐŽƵƚŚ ĂŶĚ ĞĂƐƚ ĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘ ^ĞǀĞƌĂů ĚĞĐŽƌĂƚŝǀĞ ǁŽŽĚLJ ƐŚƌƵďƐ ĂƌĞ
ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚƌĂŶĚŽŵůLJŽŶƚŚĞůĂǁŶ͕ƉƌŝŵĂƌŝůLJŽŶƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚͬĨƌŽŶƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘ůĂƌŐĞƚƌĞĞ
ĂůƐŽŐƌŽǁƐďĞŚŝŶĚ;ŶŽƌƚŚŽĨͿƚŚĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ǁŚŽƐĞĨŽůŝĂŐĞŝƚĐŽǀĞƌƐ͘ŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐĞdžƚĞŶĚ
ĂůŽŶŐ ƚŚĞ >ĂƵƌĞů ĂŶĚDĂƚƚŚĞǁƐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŝĚĞƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͕ǁŝƚŚŶĂƌƌŽǁůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚƐƚƌŝƉƐ
ĐŽŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐĂŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨĨĂŝƌůLJůĂƌŐĞĚĞĐŝĚƵŽƵƐƚƌĞĞƐƐĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ͘KŶ
ƚŚĞ ƐŽƵƚŚ ƐŝĚĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͕ ƐƚƌĂŝŐŚƚ ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ ƉĂƚŚǁĂLJƐ ĞdžƚĞŶĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ
ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƚŽƚŚĞŵĂŝŶĞŶƚƌŝĞƐŽĨƚŚĞĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂŶĚǁĞƐƚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘
ƚƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞƌŶĞŶĚŽĨƚŚĞƉĂƌĐĞůŝƐĂŶŽƌƚŚͲƐŽƵƚŚŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚϳͲƵŶŝƚŐĂƌĂŐĞƚŚĂƚĂďƵƚƐĂŶĚŝƐĂůŝŐŶĞĚ
ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƵŶƉĂǀĞĚĂůůĞLJƚŚĂƚďŝƐĞĐƚƐůŽĐŬϭϯϲ͘
Ϯϰ͘ ƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͕ŽƌŽďũĞĐƚƐ͗
tĞƐƚ^ŝĚĞĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͗ƐŝŶŐůĞͲƐƚŽƌLJ͕ϭϱ͘ϱĨĞĞƚǁŝĚĞdžϮϲ͘ϱĨĞĞƚůŽŶŐďƌŝĐŬĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĞdžƚĞŶĚƐĨƌŽŵ
ƚŚĞĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͛ƐǁĞƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĂďƵƚƐŽƌŝƐĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞƌĞĂƌŽĨĂŶŽůĚĞƌ;ϭϵϮϲͿ
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 98
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ŐĂƌĂŐĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘dŚĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶŝƐĐŽǀĞƌĞĚďLJĂĨůĂƚƌŽŽĨǁŝƚŚĂĨƵůůͲůĞŶŐƚŚĨůĂƚĐĂŶŽƉLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŶŐ
ĨŽƵƌĨĞĞƚďĞLJŽŶĚƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚͬĨƌŽŶƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƚŽƐŚĂĚĞƚŚĞĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞǁĂůŬǁĂLJĞdžƚĞŶĚŝŶŐ
ƚŚĞ ůĞŶŐƚŚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĨĂĕĂĚĞ͘ Ŷ ĞŶƚƌLJ ŝƐ ƐŝƚƵĂƚĞĚ ŶĞĂƌ ƚŚĞ ǁĞƐƚ ĞŶĚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͛Ɛ ĨĂĕĂĚĞ͕
ĞƋƵŝƉƉĞĚǁŝƚŚǁŚĂƚĂƉƉĞĂƌƐƚŽďĞƚŚĞŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůƉĂŝŶƚĞĚǁŽŽĚĞŶĚŽŽƌǁŝƚŚĂƐŵĂůůĚŝĂŵŽŶĚͲ
ƐŚĂƉĞĚ ůŝŐŚƚ͘ dŽ ƚŚĞ ƌŝŐŚƚͬĞĂƐƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĞŶƚƌLJ ŝƐ Ă ůĂƌŐĞ ŚŽƌŝnjŽŶƚĂůůLJͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚ ƉŝĐƚƵƌĞǁŝŶĚŽǁ
ĨůĂŶŬĞĚ ďLJ ŶĂƌƌŽǁǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ͖ƚŚŝƐůĂƌŐĞŵƵůƚŝͲƉĂƌƚǁŝŶĚŽǁŚĂƐĂƌĞĚƚĂďƵůĂƌƐĂŶĚƐƚŽŶĞƐŝůů͘
ƌĐŚŝǀĂůĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞƉŽŝŶƚƐƚŽĂĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĚĂƚĞŽĨĐ͘ϭϵϱϭ͘/ƚƐŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƵŶĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚ͘
'ĂƌĂŐĞ͗^ŝƚƵĂƚĞĚĂƚƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞŶĚŽĨƚŚĞƉĂƌĐĞů͕ƚŚŝƐůŽŶŐďƵƚŶĂƌƌŽǁƌĞĐƚĂŶŐƵůĂƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨĂĐĞƐ
ĂŶĂůůĞLJƉůĂĐĞĚŝŶĂŶŽƌƚŚͲƐŽƵƚŚŽƌŝĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘/ƚŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐϭϴĨĞĞƚǁŝĚĞdžϲϱĨĞĞƚůŽŶŐ͘dŚŝƐŐĂƌĂŐĞ
ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝƐĂĨůĂƚͲƌŽŽĨĞĚďƌŝĐŬƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁŝƚŚĂĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĨůŽŽƌĐŽŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐƐĞǀĞŶ;ϳͿŝĚĞŶƚŝĐĂůŽŶĞͲ
ĐĂƌŐĂƌĂŐĞďĂLJƐƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞĚďLJƉĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶǁĂůůƐ͕ĂŶĚĞĂĐŚƐĞĂůĞĚǁŝƚŚǁŚĂƚĂƉƉĞĂƌƚŽďĞŽƌŝŐŝŶĂů
ŚŝŶŐĞĚĚŽƵďůĞǁŽŽĚĞŶĚŽŽƌƐ͘dŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞǁĂƐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚŝŶϭϵϮϲƚŽƐĞƌǀĞƚŚĞƚĞŶĂŶƚƐŽĨƚŚĞ
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂƉƉĞĂƌƐƚŽďĞŝŶĨĂŝƌůLJŐŽŽĚ͕ƵŶĂůƚĞƌĞĚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ďƵƚ
ůŝŬĞůLJŝƐŶŽƚƵƐĞĚĂŶLJůŽŶŐĞƌĨŽƌƐŚĞůƚĞƌŝŶŐĂƵƚŽŵŽďŝůĞƐ͘
/s͘Z,/d dhZ>,/^dKZz
Ϯϱ͘ ĂƚĞŽĨŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞ͗ĐƚƵĂů͗ϭϵϮϮ
^ŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿŽĨŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͗ƵŝůĚŝŶŐWĞƌŵŝƚEŽ͘ϭϬϮϭ͕ĚĂƚĞĚ:ƵŶĞϭϰ͕ϭϵϮϮ͕ĨƌŽŵĞŶƚƌLJŝŶ͞>ŽŐŽĨ
ƵŝůĚŝŶŐWĞƌŵŝƚƐ͕͟ϭϵϮϬʹĐ͘ĞĂƌůLJϭϵϱϬƐ͕ŝŶĐŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŝƐĐŽǀĞƌLJDƵƐĞƵŵ>ŽĐĂů
,ŝƐƚŽƌLJƌĐŚŝǀĞ͕ĂŶĚĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŽŶůŝŶĞƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ,ŝƐƚŽƌLJŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶǁĞďƐŝƚĞ͘dŚŝƐ
ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĚĂƚĞŝƐĂůƐŽǀĞƌŝĨŝĞĚďLJĐŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶŽĨƚŚĞϭϵϭϳĂŶĚϭϵϮϱ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ^ĂŶďŽƌŶ&ŝƌĞ
/ŶƐƵƌĂŶĐĞŽŵƉĂŶLJŵĂƉƐŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŽŶŵŝĐƌŽĨŝůŵĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ>ŝďƌĂƌLJŽĨŽŶŐƌĞƐƐ͘
&Žƌƚ ŽůůŝŶƐ ŝƚLJ ŝƌĞĐƚŽƌLJ ĞŶƚƌŝĞƐ ĂůƐŽ ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ ŚŽƵƐĞ ǁĂƐ ƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ ŽĐĐƵƉŝĞĚ
ďĞƚǁĞĞŶϭϵϮϮĂŶĚϭϵϮϱ͘
Ϯϲ͘ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚ͗hŶŬŶŽǁŶ
^ŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿŽĨŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͗EŽŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƵŶĚ
Ϯϳ͘ ƵŝůĚĞƌͬŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌ͗KƌĂ ͘>ŽŶŐ
^ŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿŽĨŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͗ƵŝůĚŝŶŐWĞƌŵŝƚEŽ͘ϭϬϮϭ͕ĚĂƚĞĚ:ƵŶĞϭϰ͕ϭϵϮϮ͕ĨƌŽŵĞŶƚƌLJŝŶ͞>ŽŐŽĨ
ƵŝůĚŝŶŐWĞƌŵŝƚƐ͕͟ϭϵϮϬʹĐ͘ĞĂƌůLJϭϵϱϬƐ͕ŝŶĐŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŝƐĐŽǀĞƌLJDƵƐĞƵŵ>ŽĐĂů
,ŝƐƚŽƌLJƌĐŚŝǀĞ͕ĂŶĚĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŽŶůŝŶĞƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ,ŝƐƚŽƌLJŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶǁĞďƐŝƚĞ͘
Ϯϴ͘ KƌŝŐŝŶĂůŽǁŶĞƌ͗KƌĂ ͘>ŽŶŐ
^ŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿŽĨŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͗ŝƚLJŽĨ&ƚ͘ŽůůŝŶƐƵŝůĚŝŶŐWĞƌŵŝƚEŽ͘ϭϬϮϭ͕ŝƐƐƵĞĚŽŶ:ƵŶĞϭϰ͕ϭϵϮϮ
Ϯϵ͘ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ ŚŝƐƚŽƌLJ ;ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĚĂƚĞƐ ŽĨ ŵĂũŽƌ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͕ ĂůƚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ Žƌ
ĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶƐͿ͗dŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁĂƐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚŝŶŵŝĚͲƚŽͲůĂƚĞϭϵϮϮ͕ďLJŽǁŶĞƌĂŶĚ
ďƵŝůĚĞƌKƌĂ ͘>ŽŶŐŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͘,ĞǁĂƐŝƐƐƵĞĚĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉĞƌŵŝƚ;WĞƌŵŝƚEŽ͘ϭϬϮϭͿŽŶ:ƵŶĞ
ϭϰ͕ϭϵϮϮĨŽƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨĂŶ͞ƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚŚŽƵƐĞ͕͟ĨŽƌĂŶĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ ĐŽƐƚ ŽĨ
ΨϮϰ͕ϬϬϬ͘/Ŷ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌŽĨϭϵϮϲ͕ĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉĞƌŵŝƚ;WĞƌŵŝƚEŽ͘ϭϱϬϴͿǁĂƐŝƐƐƵĞĚƚŽƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚ
ŽǁŶĞƌƐD͘^͘&ŝƐŚďĂĐŬΘ;ƌ͘WĞƚĞƌ:͍͘ͿDĐ,ƵŐŚƚŽĞƌĞĐƚĂŶϭϴĨƚdžϲϱĨƚ͕ϳͲƐƚĂůůŐĂƌĂŐĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ĨŽƌƵƐĞďLJĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞ͕ǁŚŝĐŚǁĂƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƚŽĐŽƐƚΨϭ͕ϰϱϬƚŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚ͕
ŚĂĚĂĐĞŵĞŶƚĨůŽŽƌ͕ďƌŝĐŬǁĂůůƐ͕ĂŶĚĂĐŽŵƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶƌŽŽĨ͘dŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞǁĂƐƌĞͲƌŽŽĨĞĚŝŶϭϵϰϬ
;WĞƌŵŝƚEŽ͘ϲϯϱϳ͕ĚĂƚĞĚ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌϮϲ͕ϭϵϰϬͿ͘ĐŽƵƉůĞŽĨŽƚŚĞƌŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁĞƌĞŵĂĚĞƚŽ
ƚŚĞĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞĞĂƌůLJϭϵϱϬƐ͘/Ŷϭϵϱϭ͕ŽǁŶĞƌD͘sĂŶĚĞtĞŐŚĞŽďƚĂŝŶĞĚĂƉĞƌŵŝƚ
ƚŽ͞ŝŶƐƵůĂƚĞĐĞŝůŝŶŐŽŶϰƚŚĨůŽŽƌ͟;WĞƌŵŝƚEŽ͘ϭϮϱϲϱ͕ĚĂƚĞĚĞĐĞŵďĞƌϮϲ͕ϭϵϱϭͿ͕ĨŽƌĂŶĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚ
ĐŽƐƚŽĨΨϰϭϬ͘^ĞǀĞƌĂůLJĞĂƌƐůĂƚĞƌ͕ŝŶϭϵϱϰ͕ƚŚĞƐĂŵĞŽǁŶĞƌŽďƚĂŝŶĞĚĂŶŽƚŚĞƌƉĞƌŵŝƚ;WĞƌŵŝƚEŽ͘
ϭϯϱϭϲ͕ĚĂƚĞĚƉƌŝůϭϯ͕ϭϵϱϰͿƚŽ͞ƵŝůĚĂƌŽŽĨŽǀĞƌĨƌŽŶƚĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƚŽƉƌĞƐĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͖͟ŝƚǁĂƐĂ
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 99
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ĨƌĂŵĞĂŶĚŵĞƚĂůƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĐĂŶŽƉLJƉůĂĐĞĚĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞŵĂŝŶĞŶƚƌLJƐƚĞƉƐ͕ŵĞĂƐƵƌŝŶŐĨŽƵƌĨĞĞƚǁŝĚĞ
ĂŶĚĞŝŐŚƚĨĞĞƚůŽŶŐ͕ǁŝƚŚĂŶĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚŽĨΨϯϬϬ͘
dŚĞŽŶůLJŽƚŚĞƌƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůĐŚĂŶŐĞƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJǁĂƐŵĂĚĞŝŶƚŚĞĞĂƌůLJϭϵϱϬƐ͕ǁŚĞŶĂŽŶĞ
ƐƚŽƌLJ͕ďƌŝĐŬ͕ĨůĂƚͲƌŽŽĨĞĚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ;ϭϱ͘ϱĨƚdžϮϲ͘ϱĨƚͿǁĂƐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚĞdžƚĞŶĚŝŶŐǁĞƐƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͛ƐǁĞƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞϭϵϮϲŐĂƌĂŐĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂƚ
ƚŚĞƉĂƌĐĞů͛ƐǁĞƐƚĞĚŐĞ͘
ϯϬ͘ KƌŝŐŝŶĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶͺͺͺyͺͺͺͺDŽǀĞĚͺͺͺͺͺͺͺĂƚĞŽĨŵŽǀĞ;ƐͿ͗Eͬ
s͘,/^dKZ/>^^K/d/KE^
ϯϭ͘ KƌŝŐŝŶĂůƵƐĞ;ƐͿ͗ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůʹDƵůƚŝͲ&ĂŵŝůLJǁĞůůŝŶŐ
ϯϮ͘ /ŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞƵƐĞ;ƐͿ͗EŽŶĞ
ϯϯ͘ ƵƌƌĞŶƚƵƐĞ;ƐͿ͗ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůʹDƵůƚŝͲ&ĂŵŝůLJǁĞůůŝŶŐ
ϯϰ͘ ^ŝƚĞƚLJƉĞ;ƐͿ͗ƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ϯϱ͘ ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂůďĂĐŬŐƌŽƵŶĚ͗dŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚŝŶ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ǁĂƐ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚ ŝŶ ϭϵϮϮ ďLJ ƉƌŽůŝĨŝĐ ŽǁŶĞƌ ĂŶĚ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ KƌĂ ͘ >ŽŶŐ͘ ^ŝŶĐĞ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŝŵĞ͕ ŝƚ ŚĂƐ
ƌĞŵĂŝŶĞĚŝŶĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĂůƵƐĞĂƐĂŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞĐůŽƐĞƚŽŽůŽƌĂĚŽ^ƚĂƚĞhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJ͘
dŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁĂƐĞƌĞĐƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞϭϵϮϬƐ͕ǁŚŝĐŚǁĂƐĂƉĞƌŝŽĚŽĨƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶŐƌŽǁƚŚĂŶĚ
ŚŽŵĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝŶ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͘dŚĞĐŝƚLJ͛ƐƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚϯϭйĨƌŽŵϴ͕ϳϱϱŝŶϭϵϮϬ͕ƚŽϭϭ͕ϰϴϵ
ŝŶϭϵϯϬ͘dŚĞƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶŝŶĨůƵdžĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚŝƐĚĞĐĂĚĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚĂƐƚƌŽŶŐƌĞƐƵƌŐĞŶĐĞĂĨƚĞƌƚŚĞ
ůĂĐŬůƵƐƚĞƌϭϵϭϬƐ;ǁŚŝĐŚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚƚŚĞtŽƌůĚtĂƌ/LJĞĂƌƐͿ͘ƵƌŝŶŐƚŚŝƐĚĞĐĂĚĞ;ƚŚĞϭϵϭϬƐͿ͕&Žƌƚ
ŽůůŝŶƐ͛ƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶŐƌĞǁďLJĂŵĞƌĞϲ͘ϲй͕ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƚŚƌĞĞĚĞĐĂĚĞƐ;ϭϴϴϬͲϭϵϭϬͿŽĨƉƌŽůŝĨŝĐĂŶĚ
ƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĞĚŐƌŽǁƚŚ͘
dŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͛ƐŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůŽǁŶĞƌĂŶĚďƵŝůĚĞƌ͕KƌĂ ͘>ŽŶŐ͕ǁŚŽĂƌƌŝǀĞĚŝŶ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŝŶϭϵϬϭĨƌŽŵ
<ĂŶƐĂƐǁŝƚŚŚŝƐǁŝĨĞWĂƚŝĞŶĐĞ͕ŝƐƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŶŐŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJĚǁĞůůŝŶŐƐ
ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚƐĞǀĞƌĂůůĂƌŐĞƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘ džĂŵƉůĞƐŽĨƚŚĞůĂƚƚĞƌ
ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĚǀĞŶƚŝƐƚŚƵƌĐŚůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚϰϬϬtŚĞĚďĞĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ďƵŝůƚŝŶϭϵϬϯ͖ƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ
;ϭϵϮϮͿ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞƌŵƐƚƌŽŶŐ,ŽƚĞů;ϭϵϮϮͲϮϯͿŽŶƚŚĞĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨ^ŽƵƚŚŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞĂŶĚKůŝǀĞ
^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ͘
KƌĂ>ŽŶŐĞǀŝĚĞŶƚůLJǁĂƐŬĞĞŶůLJĂǁĂƌĞŽĨƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĨŽƌĂŶĚĨŝŶĂŶĐŝĂůďĞŶĞĨŝƚŽĨŽǁŶŝŶŐŵƵůƚŝͲ
ĨĂŵŝůLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĚƵƌŝŶŐĂƚŝŵĞ;ƚŚĞĞĂƌůLJϭϵϮϬƐͿ͕ǁŚĞŶƚŚĞĞĐŽŶŽŵLJǁĂƐĚŽŝŶŐǀĞƌLJǁĞůů͕ƚŚĞ
ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶ ǁĂƐ ŐƌŽǁŝŶŐ ƌĂƉŝĚůLJ͕ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ ŚĞ ĂĐƋƵŝƌĞĚ ŝŶ ůŽĐŬ ϭϯϲ ŶĞĂƌ ƚŚĞ
ƵŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJǁĂƐŝĚĞĂů͘dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞƌŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝƐƵŶŬŶŽǁŶ͘ĨƚĞƌŽďƚĂŝŶŝŶŐĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉĞƌŵŝƚ
ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĐŝƚLJŽŶ:ƵŶĞϭϰ͕ϭϵϮϮƚŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĂƚŚƌĞĞͲƐƚŽƌLJďƌŝĐŬĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͕ŝƚǁĂƐƌĞĂĚLJ
ĨŽƌŽĐĐƵƉĂŶĐLJŝŶůĂƚĞϭϵϮϮŽƌǀĞƌLJĞĂƌůLJϭϵϮϯ͘KƌĂůĞĨƚŚŝƐƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůŵĂƌŬŽŶƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚ
ƚŚĞǁŽƌĚ͞>KE'͟ƐƉĞůůĞĚŽƵƚǁŝƚŚŝŶďƌĂƐƐͲƉůĂƚĞĚ;͍ͿƚŚƌĞĞͲĚŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶĂůůĞƚƚĞƌƐĂĨĨŝdžĞĚƚŽƚŚĞ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͛ƐĨĂĕĂĚĞ͘
dŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͛ƐĐŚĂŝŶŽĨƚŝƚůĞǁĂƐŶŽƚƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĞĚ͕ďƵƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉĞƌŵŝƚŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂ
ƉĂƌƚŝĂůůŝƐƚ͘/ƚĂƉƉĞĂƌƐƚŚĂƚD͘^͘&ŝƐŚďĂĐŬĂŶĚƌ͘WĞƚĞƌDĐ,ƵŐŚŚĂĚĂĐƋƵŝƌĞĚŽǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉďLJ
^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌŽĨϭϵϮϲ͘^ƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚŬŶŽǁŶŽǁŶĞƌƐ͕ŝŶĐŚƌŽŶŽůŽŐŝĐĂůŽƌĚĞƌ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ,ƵďĞƌƚŽƚƚŽŶĞ͕
,͘W͘ĂŶĚD͘tŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶ͕D͘sĂŶĞtĞŐŚĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕>ŝŵŝƚĞĚ;ǁŝƚŚĂďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐ
ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŽĨϭϮϭE͘ŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞͿ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 100
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ƐƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁĂƐĂďŽƵƚƚŽďĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚ͕ƚŚĞƌĞǁĞƌĞŽŶůLJƚŚƌĞĞĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ ůŝƐƚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϭϵϮϮ &Žƌƚ ŽůůŝŶƐ ĐŝƚLJ ĚŝƌĞĐƚŽƌLJ͗ ƚŚĞ ĂƵŵĂŶ ƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ ;ϯϭϵ ^ŽƵƚŚ
ŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞͿ͕ƚŚĞ&ŽƌƌĞƐƚĞƌƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ;ϮϬϮtĂůŶƵƚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ŝŶƚŚĞ͞KůĚdŽǁŶ͟ĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů
ĂƌĞĂͿ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞsŝƌŐŝŶŝĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĂƚϭϱϲ^ŽƵƚŚŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞ͘ŝƚLJĚŝƌĞĐƚŽƌŝĞƐůĂƚĞƌŝŶƚŚĞ
ϭϵϮϬƐƌĞǀĞĂůĂĨůƵƌƌLJŽĨŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJŝŶ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐĂĐĐŽŵƉĂŶLJŝŶŐƚŚĞ
ĞdžƚĞŶƐŝǀĞ ŚŽŵĞ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ƉŚĞŶŽŵĞŶŽŶ ĚƵƌŝŶŐ ƚŚŝƐ ĚLJŶĂŵŝĐ ĚĞĐĂĚĞ͘ dŚĞ ϭϵϮϱ ĐŝƚLJ ĚŝƌĞĐƚŽƌLJ
ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƚƚŚĂƚƚŝŵĞƚŚƌĞĞŵŽƌĞĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐǁĞƌĞŝŶŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŝŶ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕
ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ>ŝŶŶƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĂƐϭϮϮZĞŵŝŶŐƚŽŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ƚŚĞ^ĐŽƚƚƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĂƚϵϬϰ^ŽƵƚŚ
ŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞ͕ĂŶĚŽĨĐŽƵƌƐĞ͕ƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĂƚϮϮϬ^ŽƵƚŚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͘dǁŽLJĞĂƌƐůĂƚĞƌ
;ϭϵϮϳͿƚŚĞĐŝƚLJ͛ƐƐƚŽĐŬŽĨŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚďLJƚŚƌĞĞŵŽƌĞĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͗ƚŚĞ
ŽŶŶĂŶƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĂƚϯϭϳЪtĂůŶƵƚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ƚŚĞ<ĞŶƐŝŶŐƚŽŶƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƐŝƚƵĂƚĞĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽ
ƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĂƚϮϬϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞDŝůůĞƌůŽĐŬ͕Ăƚϭϱϲ>ŝŶĚĞŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͘
ƵĞƚŽƚŚĞůĂƌŐĞŶƵŵďĞƌĂŶĚĨƌĞƋƵĞŶƚƚƵƌŶŽǀĞƌŽĨƚŚĞůŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͛ƐƚĞŶĂŶƚƐŽǀĞƌ
ƚŝŵĞ͕ŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƚĞŶĂŶƚƐĂƌĞƵŶůŝŬĞůLJƚŽƌĞŶĚĞƌĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƌĞŶƚĂůƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐ
ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂůůLJƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚ͘,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕Ă͞ƐŶĂƉƐŚŽƚ͟ŽĨƚŚĞƚLJƉĞƐŽĨƉĞŽƉůĞǁŚŽŽĐĐƵƉŝĞĚƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ŶŽƚůŽŶŐĂĨƚĞƌŝƚǁĂƐďƵŝůƚ͕ŝƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞϭϵϮϱ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐĐŝƚLJĚŝƌĞĐƚŽƌLJĂƐƐŚŽǁŶďĞůŽǁ͗
Ɖƚ͘ηϭ DƌƐ͘,ĂƌƌŝĞƚtĂƌĨĞů͕ĂǁŝĚŽǁĂŶĚƐƚƵĚĞŶƚĂƚŶĞĂƌďLJŽůŽ͘ŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůŽůůĞŐĞ;͖ŶŽǁ^hͿ͖
Ɖƚ͘ηϮ tĂůƚĞƌ&͘'ĂƌƌŝƐŽŶ͕ĂĐůĞƌŬĂƚƚŚĞ>ŽǁĞůůͲDŽŽƌĞ,ĂƌĚǁĂƌĞŽŵƉĂŶLJ͕ĂŶĚŚŝƐǁŝĨĞ'ŽůĚĂ͖
Ɖƚ͘ηϯŽŶƌĂĚ^͘ĂŶĚ ůůĂ/ĐŬĞƐ͕ŶŽŽĐĐƵƉĂƚŝŽŶƐůŝƐƚĞĚ͕ƉƌĞƐƵŵĂďůLJƌĞƚŝƌĞĚ͖
Ɖƚ͘ηϰDƌƐ͘ZŚŽĚĂDĐ/ŶƚLJƌĞ;ǁŝĚŽǁͿ͖
Ɖƚ͘ηϱDƌƐ͘&͘͘ƌŝƐďĂŶĞ;ǁŝĚŽǁͿĂŶĚtŝůůŝĂŵ,͘ƌŝƐďĂŶĞ͕ĂƐƚƵĚĞŶƚĂƚ͖
Ɖƚ͘ηϲDŝůĞƐ͘ƌĂĚĨŝĞůĚ͕ŵĂŶĂŐĞƌĂƚŽŝƐĞͲWĂLJĞƚƚĞ>ƵŵďĞƌŽ͕ĂŶĚŚŝƐǁŝĨĞůĂŶĐŚĞ͖
Ɖƚ͘ηϳ:ŽŚŶZ͘,ĂŶĚLJ͕ĂĐĂƐŚŝĞƌĂƚƚŚĞ&ŝƌƐƚEĂƚŝŽŶĂůĂŶŬ͕ĂŶĚŚŝƐǁŝĨĞDĂƌŐĂƌĞƚ͖
Ɖƚ͘ηϴDƌƐ͘DĂƌƚŚĂtŝůŬŝŶƐ;ǁŝĚŽǁͿ͖
Ɖƚ͘ηϵDƌƐ͘ ŵŵĂ ͘tĂƚƚƐ;ǁŝĚŽǁͿ͖
Ɖƚ͘ηϭϬ,ĂƌƌLJ͘dŝĞŵĂŶŶĂŶĚŚŝƐǁŝĨĞDĂƌLJ͕ŶŽŽĐĐƵƉĂƚŝŽŶƐůŝƐƚĞĚ͕ƉƌĞƐƵŵĂďůLJƌĞƚŝƌĞĚ͖
Ɖƚ͘ηϭϭ:ŽŚŶƵĨĨŝĞůĚ͕ĂƐĂůĞƐŵĂŶ͕ĂŶĚŚŝƐǁŝĨĞĂƌLJů͖
Ɖƚ͘ηϭϮZŽLJt͘&ŽĂƌĚ͕ĂŶŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŽƌĂƚ͕ĂŶĚŚŝƐǁŝĨĞZƵƚŚ͖
Ɖƚ͘ηϭϯ&ƌĂŶŬD͘^ƚŽǁ͕ĂŬŬĞĞƉĞƌĂƚƚŚĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐďƐƚƌĂĐƚŽŵƉĂŶLJ͕ĂŶĚŚŝƐǁŝĨĞ>ƵĞƚƚĂ͖ĂŶĚ
Ɖƚ͘ηϭϰůĂƌĞŶĐĞ<͘,ĂƌƌŝƐ͕ĂƐĂůĞƐŵĂŶ͕ĂŶĚŚŝƐǁŝĨĞZƵƚŚ
ƐĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞĚďLJƚŚĞƚĞŶĂŶƚůŝƐƚĂďŽǀĞ͕ŚĂůĨŽĨƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƵŶŝƚƐǁĞƌĞŽĐĐƵƉŝĞĚďLJŶŽŶͲ
ǁŽƌŬŝŶŐ ǁŝĚŽǁƐ ;ĨŝǀĞ͖ ϯϲй ŽĨ ƚŽƚĂůͿ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƚŝƌĞĞƐ ;ϭϰйͿ͘ dŚĞ ŽƚŚĞƌ ƵŶŝƚƐ ǁĞƌĞ ŽĐĐƵƉŝĞĚ ďLJ
ŵĂƌƌŝĞĚĐŽƵƉůĞƐ͘ƐǁĂƐĂĐŽŵŵŽŶƐŽĐŝĂůĂƌƌĂŶŐĞŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐƚŝŵĞƉĞƌŝŽĚ͕ŵĞŶƚLJƉŝĐĂůůLJǁĞƌĞ
ĞŵƉůŽLJĞĚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞŚŽŵĞ͕ǁŚŝůĞƚŚĞŝƌǁŝǀĞƐǁĞƌĞŶŽƚ͕ĂŶĚŝƚĂƉƉĞĂƌƐƚŚĂƚŵŽƐƚŝĨŶŽƚĂůůŽĨ
ƚŚĞƚĞŶĂŶƚƐ͛ũŽďƐǁĞƌĞůŝŬĞůLJŶŽƚŚŝŐŚͲƉĂLJŝŶŐ͘KĐĐƵƉĂƚŝŽŶƐƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞϭϵϮϱ͞ƐŶĂƉƐŚŽƚ͟
ŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĐůĞƌŬƐ͕ĐĂƐŚŝĞƌƐĂŶĚĂŵĂŶĂŐĞƌŽĨůŽĐĂůďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͘dǁŽƐĂůĞƐŵĞŶĂƌĞĂůƐŽƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚ͕
ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐŽŶĞŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŽƌĂƚŶĞĂƌďLJ͘dǁŽŽĨƚŚĞƵŶŝƚƐĂůƐŽĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĞĚƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ͘
dŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐŚĂǀĞĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŽƵƐůLJƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĨŽƌŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐĂŶĚĚŝǀĞƌƐĞƉĞŽƉůĞ
ĨƌŽŵŝƚƐŽƉĞŶŝŶŐŝŶůĂƚĞϭϵϮϮŽƌĞĂƌůLJϭϵϮϯƵŶƚŝůƚŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚ ǁŝůů ůŝŬĞůLJ ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞ ƚŚŝƐ
ǀĂůƵĂďůĞƌŽůĞĨĂƌŝŶƚŽƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞ͘
dŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŚĂĚƚǁŽŵĂũŽƌŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĚƵƌŝŶŐŝƚƐŚŝƐƚŽƌLJʹĂϳͲďĂLJĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚŐĂƌĂŐĞĨŽƌ
ƚĞŶĂŶƚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ;ϭϵϮϲͿ͕ĂŶĚĂƐŵĂůůƐŝŶŐůĞƐƚŽƌLJǁĞƐƚƐŝĚĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚ Đ͘ ϭϵϱϭ͕ ďƵƚ
ǁŚŽƐĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŝƐƵŶŬŶŽǁŶ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 101
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
dŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĂƚϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚǁĂƐŽĨĨŝĐŝĂůůLJĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚĂƐĂŝƚLJŽĨ
&Žƌƚ ŽůůŝŶƐ >ŽĐĂů >ĂŶĚŵĂƌŬ ƉĞƌ KƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ EŽ͘ Ϯϳ͘ WƌŝŽƌ ƚŽ ŝƚƐ >ŽĐĂů >ĂŶĚŵĂƌŬ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ
;ŝŶŝƚŝĂƚĞĚďLJƌĞƋƵĞƐƚŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŽǁŶĞƌƐ͕^ŽŶŝĂĂŶĚ,ŽǁĂƌĚEŽƌŶĞƐĂŶĚ ůĞĂŶŽƌĂŶĚZŝĐŚĂƌĚ
ŶĚĞƌƐŽŶͿ͕ƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJǁĂƐĂůƐŽĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŽďĞĂĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŶŐĞůĞŵĞŶƚŽĨ
ƚŚĞ >ĂƵƌĞů ^ĐŚŽŽů Žƌ DŝĚƚŽǁŶ ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐ ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ;ϱ>Z͘ϰϲϯͿ ǁŚŝĐŚ ǁĂƐ ŽĨĨŝĐŝĂůůLJ ĂĚĚĞĚ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ
EĂƚŝŽŶĂůZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌŽĨ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐWůĂĐĞƐŽŶKĐƚŽďĞƌϯ͕ϭϵϴϬ͘
dŚĞ ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ >ĂƵƌĞů ^ĐŚŽŽů ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐ ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ŝƐ ƐƵŵŵĂƌŝnjĞĚ ďLJ ,ŝƐƚŽƌLJŽůŽƌĂĚŽĂƐ
ĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗͞>ŽĐĂƚĞĚƐŽƵƚŚŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͛ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶĐŽƌĞ͕ƚŚĞĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚŽǀĞƌĂƐŝdžƚLJLJĞĂƌ
ƉĞƌŝŽĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŵŝĚͲϭϴϳϬƐŝŶƚŽƚŚĞϭϵϯϬƐ͘ůƐŽŬŶŽǁŶĂƐƚŚĞDŝĚƚŽǁŶ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͕ŝƚŝƐĂ
ŐŽŽĚ ĞdžĂŵƉůĞ ŽĨ ĞĂƌůLJ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ŝůůƵƐƚƌĂƚĞƐ ƚŚĞ ƐŽĐŝĂů ĞǀŽůƵƚŝŽŶ ŽĨ &Žƌƚ
ŽůůŝŶƐ͘ KĨ ƚŚĞ ϲϲϱ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐ͕ ϱϰϵ ĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚĞ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͛Ɛ ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů
ŝŶƚĞŐƌŝƚLJ͘͟dŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJǁĂƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŽďĞĂĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŶŐĞůĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞ
ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͘
/Ŷ ϮϬϭϵ͕ Ă ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ƉĞƌŵŝƚ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ ƚŽ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞ ƚŚĞ ĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůŝƚLJ ĂŶĚ ĂƉƉĞĂƌĂŶĐĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ
ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJǁŝƚŚĂŶĞǁůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚĂůƚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶĨĞŶĞƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞǀŝƐŝďůĞƐŽƵƚŚƐŝĚĞ
ŽĨƚŚĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƚƌŝŐŐĞƌĞĚƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ
ĂŶĚƌĞͲĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚŝƐŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͘ĞĐĂƵƐĞŝƚŝƐŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶϱϬLJĞĂƌƐŽůĚ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ&Žƌƚ
ŽůůŝŶƐ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐWƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƚŚŝƐĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽďĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚŝŶŽƌĚĞƌ
ƚŽƚŚŽƌŽƵŐŚůLJĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĂƐƐĞƐƐƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͛ƐŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂůĂŶĚĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞƉĞƌ
ƚŚĞ ŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐ ƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶ ŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ ĂŶĚ ĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͘/Ŷ:ƵůLJϮϬϭϵ͕ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐ
ƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶ ĐŽŶƐƵůƚŝŶŐ ĐŽŵƉĂŶLJ ZĞƚƌŽƐƉĞĐƚ ;:ĂƐŽŶ DĂƌŵŽƌͿ ǁĂƐ ŚŝƌĞĚ ďLJ &ŽƌŐĞ Θ Žǁ
ǁĞůůŝŶŐƐŽŶďĞŚĂůĨŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŽǁŶĞƌ;ƐͿƚŽƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŽŶƚŽƚŚŝƐ
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ͕ĂŶĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶƵƉĚĂƚĞĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƚĞƌŵƐ
ŽĨ &Žƌƚ ŽůůŝŶƐ >ŽĐĂů >ĂŶĚŵĂƌŬͲĞůŝŐŝďŝůŝƚLJ ĨŽƌ ƌĞǀŝĞǁ ďLJ ƚŚĞ ŝƚLJŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐ
ƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ͘
ϯϲ͘ ^ŽƵƌĐĞƐŽĨŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͗
ŝƚLJŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ƵŝůĚŝŶŐWĞƌŵŝƚŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ĚĞƌŝǀĞĚĨƌŽŵ>ŽŐŽĨƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
WĞƌŵŝƚƐ͕ϭϵϮϬʹĐ͘ĞĂƌůLJϭϵϱϬƐ͕ŝŶĐŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŝƐĐŽǀĞƌLJDƵƐĞƵŵ>ŽĐĂů
,ŝƐƚŽƌLJƌĐŚŝǀĞ͘ǀĂŝůĂďůĞĚŝŐŝƚĂůůLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ,ŝƐƚŽƌLJŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶ
ǁĞďƐŝƚĞ͘
&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŝƚLJŝƌĞĐƚŽƌŝĞƐ͕ĨŽƌƚŚĞLJĞĂƌƐϭϵϭϵƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϮϬϭϴ͘&ƌŽŵƚŚĞĐŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ&Žƌƚ
ŽůůŝŶƐŝƐĐŽǀĞƌLJDƵƐĞƵŵ>ŽĐĂů,ŝƐƚŽƌLJƌĐŚŝǀĞ͘
&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŽůŽƌĂĚŽĂŶ
ϭϵϱϭ ͞KƌĂ>͘ƐŝĐ>ŽŶŐŝĞƐŝŶĞůƚĂ͘͟&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŽůŽƌĂĚŽĂŶ͕tĞĚŶĞƐĚĂLJ͕^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌϭϮ͕
ϭϵϱϭ͘
&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ džƉƌĞƐƐ
ϭϵϮϯ ͞>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨ>ĂƵƌĞůĂŶĚDĂƚƚŚĞǁƐ͕͟ĐĂƉƚŝŽŶĞĚƉŚŽƚŽŐƌĂƉŚŝŶ&Žƌƚ
ŽůůŝŶƐ džƉƌĞƐƐŶŶŝǀĞƌƐĂƌLJĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕DĂLJϭϵϮϯ͕Ɖ͘ϲ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 102
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
>ĂƌŝŵĞƌŽƵŶƚLJƐƐĞƐƐŽƌ
ϭϵϰϵ WƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĂƌĚĨŽƌϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ;WĂƌĐĞůEŽ͘ϵϳϭϯϮͲϭϭͲϬϮϲͿ͘&ƌŽŵ
ƚŚĞĐŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŝƐĐŽǀĞƌLJDƵƐĞƵŵ>ŽĐĂů,ŝƐƚŽƌLJƌĐŚŝǀĞ͘
ϭϵϳϳ WƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĂƌĚĨŽƌϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ;WĂƌĐĞůEŽ͘ϵϳϭϯϮͲϭϭͲϬϮϲͿ͘&ƌŽŵ
ƚŚĞĐŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŝƐĐŽǀĞƌLJDƵƐĞƵŵ>ŽĐĂů,ŝƐƚŽƌLJƌĐŚŝǀĞ͘
ϮϬϭϵ WƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƌĞĐŽƌĚĨŽƌϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ;WĂƌĐĞůEŽ͘ϵϳϭϯϮͲ
ϭϭͲϬϮϲͿ͘>ĂƌŝŵĞƌŽƵŶƚLJƐƐĞƐƐŽƌ͛ƐǁĞďƐŝƚĞ͕ĂĐĐĞƐƐĞĚŽŶůŝŶĞ͕:ƵůLJϮϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͘
^ĂŶďŽƌŶDĂƉŽŵƉĂŶLJ
&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ŽůŽƌĂĚŽĨŝƌĞŝŶƐƵƌĂŶĐĞĂƚůĂƐƐŚĞĞƚƐƐŚŽǁŝŶŐϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ϭϵϮϱ
ĂŶĚϭϵϰϴĞĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͘ǀĂŝůĂďůĞŽŶŵŝĐƌŽĨŝůŵĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ>ŝďƌĂƌLJŽĨŽŶŐƌĞƐƐĂƚƚŚĞWŽƵĚƌĞ
ZŝǀĞƌ>ŝďƌĂƌLJŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͛ƐŵĂŝŶ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐďƌĂŶĐŚ͘
^ŝŵŵŽŶƐ͕dŚŽŵĂƐ͕ĂŶĚ>ĂƵƌŝĞ^ŝŵŵŽŶƐ͘
ϭϵϵϮ ŝƚLJŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐĞŶƚƌĂůƵƐŝŶĞƐƐŝƐƚƌŝĐƚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐŽŶƚĞdžƚƐ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJ&ƌŽŶƚZĂŶŐĞZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ
&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐĚǀĂŶĐĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ͘
s/͘^/'E/&/E
ϯϳ͘ >ŽĐĂůůĂŶĚŵĂƌŬĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ͗zĞƐͺͺyͺͺEŽͺͺͺͺͺĂƚĞŽĨĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ͗&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϭϰ͕ϭϵϵϳ
ĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŶŐĂƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJ͗ŝƚLJŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝů
ϯϴ͘ ƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞEĂƚŝŽŶĂůZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͗
ͺͺyͺ͘ƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĞǀĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞŵĂĚĞĂƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞďƌŽĂĚƉĂƚƚĞƌŶŽĨŽƵƌ
ŚŝƐƚŽƌLJ͖
ͺͺyͺͺ͘ƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞůŝǀĞƐŽĨƉĞƌƐŽŶƐƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŶŽƵƌƉĂƐƚ͖
ͺͺyͺͺ͘ ŵďŽĚŝĞƐƚŚĞĚŝƐƚŝŶĐƚŝǀĞĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐŽĨĂƚLJƉĞ͕ƉĞƌŝŽĚ͕ŽƌŵĞƚŚŽĚŽĨĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͕Žƌ
ƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐƚŚĞǁŽƌŬŽĨĂŵĂƐƚĞƌ͕ŽƌƚŚĂƚƉŽƐƐĞƐƐŚŝŐŚĂƌƚŝƐƚŝĐǀĂůƵĞƐ͕ŽƌƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐĂ
ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĂŶĚĚŝƐƚŝŶŐƵŝƐŚĂďůĞĞŶƚŝƚLJǁŚŽƐĞĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐŵĂLJůĂĐŬŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůĚŝƐƚŝŶĐƚŝŽŶ͖Žƌ
ͺͺͺͺͺͺ͘,ĂƐLJŝĞůĚĞĚ͕ŽƌŵĂLJďĞůŝŬĞůLJƚŽLJŝĞůĚ͕ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚŝŶŚŝƐƚŽƌLJŽƌƉƌĞŚŝƐƚŽƌLJ͘
ͺͺͺͺͺͺYƵĂůŝĨŝĞƐƵŶĚĞƌƌŝƚĞƌŝĂŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ';ƐĞĞDĂŶƵĂůͿ
ͺͺͺͺͺͺŽĞƐŶŽƚŵĞĞƚĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞĂďŽǀĞEĂƚŝŽŶĂůZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ
ϯϵ͘ ƌĞĂ;ƐͿŽĨƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞ͗ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ
ϰϬ͘ WĞƌŝŽĚŽĨƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞ͗ ϭϵϮϮͲWƌĞƐĞŶƚ
ϰϭ͘ >ĞǀĞůŽĨƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞ͗EĂƚŝŽŶĂůͺͺͺͺͺ^ƚĂƚĞͺͺͺͺͺͺ>ŽĐĂůͺͺyͺͺͺEŽƚƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ
ϰϮ͘ ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞ͗
&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ>ŽĐĂů>ĂŶĚŵĂƌŬͲĞůŝŐŝďŝůŝƚLJ͗
dŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĂƚϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ;ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵͿŝƐƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƵŶĚĞƌƐĞǀĞƌĂů
ŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ>ŽĐĂů>ĂŶĚŵĂƌŬͲĞůŝŐŝďŝůŝƚLJĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͗
ϭ͘ ƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚĞǀĞŶƚƐĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞďƌŽĂĚƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐŽĨŚŝƐƚŽƌLJ͗
dŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJǁĂƐĞŶǀŝƐŝŽŶĞĚĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞǀĞƌLJĞĂƌůLJϭϵϮϬƐ͕
ĚƵƌŝŶŐĂĚĞĐĂĚĞǁŚĞŶĂƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶŝŶĨůƵdžĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŵǁĂƐ
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 103
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ƚĂŬŝŶŐƉůĂĐĞŝŶ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͘dŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁĂƐŽŶĞŽĨƚŚĞĞĂƌůŝĞƌŵƵůƚŝͲƵŶŝƚ
ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚĞƌŶƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞŐƌŽǁŝŶŐĐŝƚLJ͕ĐůŽƐĞƚŽŽůŽƌĂĚŽ
ŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůŽůůĞŐĞͬŽůŽƌĂĚŽ^ƚĂƚĞhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJĂŶĚĂƐŚŽƌƚĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ
&Žƌƚ ŽůůŝŶƐ ĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů ĂƌĞĂ͘ &Žƌ ŶĞĂƌůLJ ϭϬϬ LJĞĂƌƐ ĂƐ ŽĨ ƚŚŝƐ ƚŝŵĞ ;ϮϬϭϵͿ͕ ƚŚĞ >ŽŶŐ
ƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ŚĂƐ ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĂůůLJ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ ǁŽƌŬĞƌƐ͕ ƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ͕ ĐŽůůĞŐĞ ŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŽƌƐ͕
ƌĞƚŝƌĞĞƐ͕ǁŝĚŽǁƐͬǁŝĚŽǁĞƌƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƐǁŝƚŚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŚĂƐƉůĂLJĞĚĂŶŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚ
ĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůƌŽůĞŝŶƚŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ĂŶĚŝŶƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌŽĨƚŚĞ
ĞdžƚĞŶƐŝǀĞŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůĂƌĞĂĞdžƚĞŶĚŝŶŐƐŽƵƚŚŽĨDƵůďĞƌƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚĂŶĚĞĂƐƚŽĨ^ŽƵƚŚ
ŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞ͘/ƚƐŽƌŝŐŝŶŝŶƚŚĞĞĂƌůLJϭϵϮϬƐĐŽŝŶĐŝĚĞƐǁŝƚŚĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŵƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵ
ĂƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶŝŶĨůƵdžĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞϭϵϮϬƐƚŚĂƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚƚŚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨŚƵŶĚƌĞĚƐŽĨŚŽŵĞƐ
ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞĐŝƚLJ͘ĞĐĂƵƐĞƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝƐĂƉƌŽŵŝŶĞŶƚĞdžĂŵƉůĞŽĨĞĂƌůLJ
ϮϬƚŚ ĐĞŶƚƵƌLJ ;ĂŶĚ ϭϵϮϬƐͿ ŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŝŶ &ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐƚŚĂƚŝƐ
ƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ůĂƌŐĞ ƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶ ŝŶĨůƵdž ĂŶĚ ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ďŽŽŵ ĚƵƌŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ
ϭϵϮϬƐ͕ƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĂƉƉĞĂƌƐƚŽƋƵĂůŝĨLJĨŽƌ>ŽĐĂů>ĂŶĚŵĂƌŬĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘
Ϯ͘ ƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚůŝǀĞƐŽĨƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƉĞŽƉůĞŽƌŐƌŽƵƉƐ͗
dŚĞ >ŽŶŐ ƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐ Ă ůĂƌŐĞ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŽŵŝŶĞŶƚ ĞdžĂŵƉůĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ǁŽƌŬ
ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚďLJůŽŶŐͲƚŝŵĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐďƵŝůĚĞƌ͕ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌ͕ĂŶĚĐŝƚLJďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ŝŶƐƉĞĐƚŽƌKƌĂ ͘>ŽŶŐ͕ǁŚŽůĞĨƚĂƚĂŶŐŝďůĞŵĂƌŬŽŶƚŚĞĐŝƚLJ͛ƐĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů ůĞŐĂĐLJ ĂŶĚ
ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌ͘WƌŽƵĚůLJŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚǁŝƚŚ>ŽŶŐ͛ƐŶĂŵĞŽŶŝƚƐĨĂĕĂĚĞ͕ƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁĂƐŽŶĞŽĨƚǁŽ
ůĂƌŐĞŵƵůƚŝͲƵŶŝƚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŚĞďƵŝůƚʹƚŚĞŽƚŚĞƌďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞůĂƌŐĞƌŵƐƚƌŽŶŐ,ŽƚĞů
ůŽĐĂƚĞĚ Ăƚ ^ŽƵƚŚ ŽůůĞŐĞ ǀĞŶƵĞ ĂŶĚ KůŝǀĞ ^ƚƌĞĞƚͿ Ͳ ĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐƐŝŶŐůĞĨĂŵŝůLJ
ĚǁĞůůŝŶŐƐĂŶĚĂĐŚƵƌĐŚ͘EŽƚŵƵĐŚŝƐŬŶŽǁŶĂďŽƵƚKƌĂ>ŽŶŐ͛ƐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐĂƌĞĞƌĨƌŽŵĐ͘
ϭϵϬϰƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϭϵϭϵ͕ďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞůĂĐŬŽĨƌĞĂĚŝůLJĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͖ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ŝƚŝƐĐůĞĂƌ
ƚŚĂƚŚĞŵƵƐƚŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŵĂŶLJŵŽƌĞŚŽŵĞƐĂŶĚƉŽƐƐŝďůLJŵŽƌĞŵĂũŽƌ
ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐůŝŬĞĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘>ŽĐĂƚŝŶŐƚŚŝƐĚĂƚĂǁŽƵůĚŽŶůLJƐĞƌǀĞƚŽďŽůƐƚĞƌ>ŽŶŐ͛Ɛ
ůŽĐĂů ŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶĐĞ͘ /Ŷ ƉĂƌƚ ďĞĐĂƵƐĞ ŽĨ ŝƚƐ ĐůŽƐĞ ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ ƉƌŽůŝĨŝĐ ĞĂƌůLJ ƚǁĞŶƚŝĞƚŚ
ĐĞŶƚƵƌLJůŽĐĂůďƵŝůĚĞƌKƌĂ ͘>ŽŶŐ͕ƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂƉƉĞĂƌƐƚŽƋƵĂůŝĨLJĨŽƌ>ŽĐĂů
>ĂŶĚŵĂƌŬĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘
ϯ͘ ŵďŽĚLJĚŝƐƚŝŶĐƚŝǀĞĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐŽĨĂƚLJƉĞ͕ƉĞƌŝŽĚ͕ŽƌŵĞƚŚŽĚŽĨĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗
ƵŝůƚŝŶϭϵϮϮ͕ƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝƐĂůĂƌŐĞůLJƵŶĂůƚĞƌĞĚĂŶĚĚŝƐƚŝŶĐƚŝǀĞĞdžĂŵƉůĞ
ŽĨĞĂƌůLJϮϬƚŚĐĞŶƚƵƌLJŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞŝŶ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͘/ƚĚŽĞƐŶŽƚƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚ
ĂŶ ŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĂďůĞ ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů ƐƚLJůĞ͕ ďƵƚ ŝƚƐ ƵƚŝůŝƚĂƌŝĂŶ͕ ĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚ ĐƵďŝĐ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĂŶĚ ůĂĐŬ ŽĨ
ŽƌŶĂŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ ĂƌĞ ƐƵŐŐĞƐƚŝǀĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ͞ŵŽĚĞƌŶ͟ŵŽǀĞŵĞŶƚŝŶůĂƌŐĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘dŚĞ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͛Ɛ ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů ĨŽƌŵ ŝƐ ĂůŵŽƐƚ ŝŶĚŝƐƚŝŶŐƵŝƐŚĂďůĞ ĨƌŽŵ Ă ŵƵůƚŝͲƐƚŽƌLJ ďƌŝĐŬ ŽĨĨŝĐĞ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŵŝĚͲƚǁĞŶƚŝĞƚŚĐĞŶƚƵƌLJ͕ĂŶĚďĞĐĂƵƐĞŽĨŝƚƐĂƵƐƚĞƌĞ͞ŵŽĚĞƌŶŝƐŵ͟ƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐ
ƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐŝƐŶŽƚƌĞĂĚŝůLJƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĂďůĞĂƐŚĂǀŝŶŐďĞĞŶďƵŝůƚŝŶƚŚĞĞĂƌůLJϭϵϮϬƐ͘ŶŝŶĨŽƌŵĂů
ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŽĨ ŶĞĂƌďLJ ĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞ ϭϵϮϬƐ ĐůĞĂƌůLJ ƌĞǀĞĂůĞĚ ƚŚĞ ĚŝǀĞƌƐĞ
ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů ĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚĞƐ ƚŽ ŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ >ŽŶŐ ƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐŽŶĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚĂĚĞĐŝĚĞĚůLJŵŽĚĞƌŶĂƉƉĞĂƌĂŶĐĞ͘
ĞĐĂƵƐĞŽĨŝƚƐĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞ͕ƚŚŝƐǁĞůůͲƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĚĂŶĚĚŝƐƚŝŶĐƚŝǀĞĞdžĂŵƉůĞŽĨĞĂƌůLJ
ϮϬƚŚĐĞŶƚƵƌLJĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞŝŶ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐĂƉƉĞĂƌƐƚŽƋƵĂůŝĨLJƵŶĚĞƌƚŚŝƐ
ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝŽŶĨŽƌ>ŽĐĂů>ĂŶĚŵĂƌŬĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 104
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ϰϯ͘ ƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŽĨŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůŝŶƚĞŐƌŝƚLJƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞ͗tŝƚŚƚŚĞƐŽůĞĞdžĐĞƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ
ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ;Đ͕ϭϵϱϬƐͲĞĂƌůLJϭϵϲϬƐͿǁĞƐƚƐŝĚĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ƚŚĞĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌŽĨƚŚĞŽƌŝŐŝŶĂů>ŽŶŐ
ƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝƐůŝƚƚůĞĂůƚĞƌĞĚ͕ĂŶĚƌĞƚĂŝŶƐŝŶƚĞŐƌŝƚLJŽĨůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐ
ƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůŝŶƚĞŐƌŝƚLJŽĨůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕ĐƌĂĨƚŵĂŶƐŚŝƉ͕ĨĞĞůŝŶŐĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞ
ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͛ƐŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐƐĞƚƚŝŶŐŝƐƐůŝŐŚƚůLJĐŽŵƉƌŽŵŝƐĞĚďLJƚŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶĐĞ ŽĨ Ă ůĂƌŐĞ ŵŽĚĞƌŶ
ĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞŶĚŽĨƚŚĞ>ĂƵƌĞů^ĐŚŽŽůĐĂŵƉƵƐ͕ĂĐƌŽƐƐDĂƚƚŚĞǁƐ^ƚƌĞĞƚĨƌŽŵ
ƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͛ĞĂƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͘EĞǀĞƌƚŚĞůĞƐƐ͕ƚŚĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚĂŶĚǀŝƐƵĂůůLJƉƌŽŵŝŶĞŶƚŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐ
ďƌŝĐŬ<ĞŶƐŝŶŐƚŽŶWůĂĐĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĞƌǀĞƐƚŽŽĨĨƐĞƚƚŚŝƐŝŵƉĂĐƚ͕ĂŶĚŝŶŐĞŶĞƌĂůƚŚĞ
ƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚĂƌĞĂĚŝƐƉůĂLJƐĂƵŶŝĨŝĞĚŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌ͘dŚĞĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌŽĨ
ƚŚĞ ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐͲĂŐĞ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ ĂƉƉĞĂƌƐ ƚŽ ďĞ ƵŶĂůƚĞƌĞĚ͕ ĂŶĚ ƚŚƵƐ ƌĞƚĂŝŶƐ ĞdžĐĞůůĞŶƚ ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů
ŝŶƚĞŐƌŝƚLJ͘>ŝŬĞǁŝƐĞ͕ƚŚĞĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚϳͲďĂLJŐĂƌĂŐĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚŝŶϭϵϮϲĂƉƉĞĂƌƐůĂƌŐĞůLJƵŶĂůƚĞƌĞĚ͕
ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƌĞƚĂŝŶƐ ŝƚƐ ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů ŝŶƚĞŐƌŝƚLJ͘ ƵĞ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ŚŝŐŚ ůĞǀĞůŽĨŝŶƚĞŐƌŝƚLJŽĨƚŚĞŽƌŝŐŝŶĂů
ĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͕ ǁĞƐƚ ƐŝĚĞ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ ĂŶĚ ϳͲďĂLJ ŐĂƌĂŐĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ ĐůĞĂƌůLJ ĚŝƐƉůĂLJƐ
ƐƵĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚŝŶƚĞŐƌŝƚLJƚŽŵĞĞƚƚŚĞĞůŝŐŝďŝůŝƚLJƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŽĨďŽƚŚƚŚĞEĂƚŝŽŶĂůZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌŽĨ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐ
WůĂĐĞƐĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ>ŽĐĂů>ĂŶĚŵĂƌŬƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ͘
s//͘Ed/KE>Z '/^d Z >/'//>/dz^^ ^^D Ed
ϰϰ͘ EĂƚŝŽŶĂůZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌ;ŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůͿĞůŝŐŝďŝůŝƚLJĨŝĞůĚĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ͗
ůŝŐŝďůĞyEŽƚ;/ŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůůLJͿ ůŝŐŝďůĞEĞĞĚĂƚĂ
ϰϱ͘ /ƐƚŚĞƌĞEĂƚŝŽŶĂůZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂů͍zĞƐͺEŽŝƐĐƵƐƐ͗
/ĨƚŚĞƌĞŝƐEĂƚŝŽŶĂůZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂů͕ŝƐƚŚŝƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͗
ŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŶŐͺEŽŶĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŶŐͺ
ϰϲ͘ /ĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝƐŝŶĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐEĂƚŝŽŶĂůZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͕ŝƐŝƚ͗
ŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŶŐyEŽŶĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŶŐͺEŽƚƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞͺ
s///͘/dzK&&KZdK>>/E^>K>>EDZ< >/'//>/dz^^ ^^D Ed
ϰϳ͘ >ŽĐĂů>ĂŶĚŵĂƌŬ;ŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůͿĞůŝŐŝďŝůŝƚLJĨŝĞůĚĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ͗
ůŝŐŝďůĞyEŽƚ;/ŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůůLJͿ ůŝŐŝďůĞEĞĞĚĂƚĂ
/y͘Z KZ/E'/E&KZDd/KE
ϰϴ͘ WŚŽƚŽŐƌĂƉŚŶƵŵďĞƌƐ͗ϱ>Z͘ηϭͲϯϮ
EĞŐĂƚŝǀĞƐŽƌĚŝŐŝƚĂůƉŚŽƚŽĨŝůĞƐĨŝůĞĚĂƚ͗ŝƚLJŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚZĞǀŝĞǁĞŶƚĞƌ
;ƵƌƌĞŶƚWůĂŶŶŝŶŐͿͲ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐWƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ͕ϮϴϭE͘ŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕K
ϴϬϱϮϰ
ϰϵ͘ ZĞƉŽƌƚƚŝƚůĞ͗Eͬ
ϱϬ͘ ĂƚĞ;ƐͿ͗ƵŐƵƐƚϲ͕ϮϬϭϵ
ϱϭ͘ ZĞĐŽƌĚĞƌ;ƐͿ͗ :ĂƐŽŶDĂƌŵŽƌ
ϱϮ͘ KƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶ͗ Z dZK^W d
ϱϯ͘ ĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ ϭϬϯϭ ĂƐƚϰƚŚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕hŶŝƚ͕>ŽǀĞůĂŶĚ͕KϴϬϱϯϳ
ϱϰ͘ WŚŽŶĞŶƵŵďĞƌ;ƐͿ͗;ϵϳϬͿϮϭϵͲϵϭϱϱ
,ŝƐƚŽƌLJŽůŽƌĂĚŽͲKĨĨŝĐĞŽĨƌĐŚĂĞŽůŽŐLJΘ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐWƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶ
ϭϮϬϬƌŽĂĚǁĂLJ͕ĞŶǀĞƌ͕KϴϬϮϬϯ;ϯϬϯͿϴϲϲͲϯϯϵϱ
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 105
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ;ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵͿ͕ƐŚŽǁŶŽŶĂƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞh͘^͘'ĞŽůŽŐŝĐĂů
^ƵƌǀĞLJϳ͘ϱ͛&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƚŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐƋƵĂĚƌĂŶŐůĞŵĂƉ;ϭϵϲϬ͖WŚŽƚŽƌĞǀŝƐĞĚϭϵϴϰͿ͘
ඵ
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ
ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ
ϱ>Z͘Ϯϲϲϵ
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 106
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ǭ
^ŬĞƚĐŚŵĂƉŽĨ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ;ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵͿ͘
>hZ >^dZ d
N
^ŽƵƚŚ ϴϬĨĞĞƚŽĨ>Žƚϭ͕ůŽĐŬϭϯϲŽĨƚŚĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐƚŽǁŶƐŝƚĞ
ϰͲ^ƚŽƌLJďƌŝĐŬĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ϭϰϬĨĞĞƚ
ůůĞLJ
Ddd, t^^dZ d
ϴϬĨĞĞƚ
ϰ
ϲ
ϯ
ϳͲďĂLJŐĂƌĂŐĞ
ϭͲ^ƚŽƌLJĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ
ϭ
ϳ
ϱ
Ϯ
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 107
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
WŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨĞĐĞŵďĞƌϭϵϮϱ^ĂŶďŽƌŶ&ŝƌĞ/ŶƐƵƌĂŶĐĞŽŵƉĂŶLJŵĂƉŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕
ƐŚŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĂƚϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͘dŚĞ<ĞŶƐŝŶŐƚŽŶƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝƐ
ũƵƐƚůĞĨƚͬǁĞƐƚŽĨƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 108
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
WŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨKĐƚŽďĞƌϭϵϰϴ^ĂŶďŽƌŶ&ŝƌĞ/ŶƐƵƌĂŶĐĞŽŵƉĂŶLJŵĂƉŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ƐŚŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĂƚ
ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͘dŚĞĚĂƌŬƐŚĂĚŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚĂŶĚŐĂƌĂŐĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƚŚĞLJĂƌĞ
ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚŽĨďƌŝĐŬ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 109
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ϭϵϰϵsŝĞǁŽĨϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ĨƌŽŵŽůĚ>ĂƌŝŵĞƌŽƵŶƚLJƐƐĞƐƐŽƌ͛ƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĐĂƌĚ͘
KŶĨŝůĞĂƚƚŚĞ>ŽĐĂů,ŝƐƚŽƌLJƌĐŚŝǀĞ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŝƐĐŽǀĞƌLJDƵƐĞƵŵ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 110
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ϭϵϳϳǀŝĞǁŽĨϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ĨƌŽŵŽůĚ>ĂƌŝŵĞƌŽƵŶƚLJƐƐĞƐƐŽƌ͛ƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĐĂƌĚ͘
KŶĨŝůĞĂƚƚŚĞ>ŽĐĂů,ŝƐƚŽƌLJƌĐŚŝǀĞ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐŝƐĐŽǀĞƌLJDƵƐĞƵŵ͘KŶĞͲƐƚŽƌLJĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ
ǀŝƐŝďůĞŽŶůĞĨƚƐŝĚĞŽĨďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 111
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐǁĞƐƚͲŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚ͘
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 112
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ǁŝƚŚŽŶĞсƐƚŽƌLJĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂƚůĞĨƚ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚ͘
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ǁŝƚŚŽŶĞсƐƚŽƌLJĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂƚůĞĨƚ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚͲŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 113
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
&ĂĕĂĚĞŽĨ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚ͘
ůŽƐĞƌǀŝĞǁŽĨĨĂĕĂĚĞŽĨ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 114
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
&ĂĕĂĚĞŽĨ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚ͘
ƌĂƐƐ;ƉůĂƚĞĚ͍ͿďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŶĂŵĞƐŝŐŶŽŶĨĂĕĂĚĞŽĨ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 115
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ĂŶŽƉLJͲĐŽǀĞƌĞĚŵĂŝŶĞŶƚƌLJŽĨ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 116
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
DĂŝŶĞŶƚƌLJŽŶĨĂĕĂĚĞͬƐŽƵƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 117
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ;>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐͿ͕ŵĂŝŶĞŶƚƌLJƚŽďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 118
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ĂŶŽƉLJŽǀĞƌŵĂŝŶĞŶƚƌLJƚŽϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ;>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐͿ͘
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ŽŶĞŽĨƚǁŽďƌŝĐŬƉůĂŶƚĞƌƐĨůĂŶŬŝŶŐŵĂŝŶĞŶƚƌLJŽŶĨĂĐĂĚĞ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 119
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ĞĐŽƌĂƚŝǀĞůLJƚŝůĞĚĨůŽŽƌŽĨŵĂŝŶĞŶƚƌLJƐƚĞƉŽĨϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ;>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐͿ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 120
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ;>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐͿ͕ƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůLJŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŶƵŵďĞƌŽŶĨĂĐĂĚĞ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 121
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ĂƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐƐŽƵƚŚǁĞƐƚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 122
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ;ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵͿ͕ƌĞĂƌͬŶŽƌƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐǁĞƐƚͲƐŽƵƚŚǁĞƐƚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 123
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ;>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐͿ͕ƚLJƉŝĐĂůĂƌƌĂŶŐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨďĂƐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĨŝƌƐƚĨůŽŽƌǁŝŶĚŽǁƐŽŶ
ƐŝĚĞĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘&ĂĕĂĚĞŝƐĨĞŶĞƐƚƌĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚďŽƚŚƐŝŶŐůĞĂŶĚƚĂŶĚĞŵǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 124
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ;>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐͿ͕ƚLJƉŝĐĂůƚĂŶĚĞŵĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ͘
ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ;>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐͿ͕ƚLJƉŝĐĂůƚĂŶĚĞŵďĂƐĞŵĞŶƚǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 125
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ϭͲƐƚŽƌLJĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚͲŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚ͘
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ǁĞƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚϭͲƐƚŽƌLJĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 126
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ĂƐƚƐŝĚĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ;ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚͿǁŝƚŚĞŶƚƌLJĂƚůĞĨƚ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚ͘
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ;ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚͿ͕ũƵŶĐƚŝŽŶŽĨĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂŶĚǁĞƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐ E ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 127
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƉŝĐƚƵƌĞǁŝŶĚŽǁŽŶĨƌŽŶƚͬƐŽƵƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚ͘
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƐĂŶĚƐƚŽŶĞƐŝůůŽĨƉŝĐƚƵƌĞǁŝŶĚŽǁŽŶƐŽƵƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 128
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ;ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚͿ͕ĞŶƚƌLJŽŶƐŽƵƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ĞƋƵŝƉƉĞĚ
ǁŝƚŚǁŚĂƚĂƉƉĞĂƌƐƚŽďĞŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůĚŽŽƌ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 129
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
^ĞǀĞŶͲďĂLJŐĂƌĂŐĞĂůŽŶŐĂůůĞLJŽŶƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞĚŐĞŽĨƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚ͘
^ĞǀĞŶͲďĂLJŐĂƌĂŐĞĂůŽŶŐĂůůĞLJŽŶƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞĚŐĞŽĨƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐƐŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 130
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
dǁŽŽĨƐĞǀĞŶ/ŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůŽŶĞͲĐĂƌŐĂƌĂŐĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ǀŝƐŝďůĞŝŶĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐĞĂƐƚ͘
EŽƌƚŚĞŶĚŽĨƚŚĞƐĞǀĞŶͲďĂLJŐĂƌĂŐĞĨŽƌƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ;ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚͿ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐƐŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 131
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
/ŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůŽŶĞͲĐĂƌŐĂƌĂŐĞǁŝƚŚŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůŚŝŶŐĞĚǁŽŽĚĞŶĚŽŽƌƐ͕ĂƚŶŽƌƚŚĞŶĚŽĨƐĞǀĞŶͲďĂLJŐĂƌĂŐĞ
ĨŽƌƚŚĞ>ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ;ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚͿ͕ůŽŽŬŝŶŐĞĂƐƚ͘
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 132
ŽůŽƌĂĚŽƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
ϱ>Z͘ϮϲϲϵʹϮϮϬ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
DĂũŽƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ<ŶŽǁŶƚŽ,ĂǀĞĞĞŶŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚďLJKƌĂ ͘>ŽŶŐ
dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƚĂďůĞůŝƐƚƐƚŚĞŵĂũŽƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ;ƐŝŶŐůĞĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐ͕ĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐͿ
ƚŚĂƚĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌͬďƵŝůĚĞƌKƌĂ ͘>ŽŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚŝŶ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐďĂƐĞĚƵƉŽŶůŝŵŝƚĞĚƌĞĂĚŝůLJĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĂƌĐŚŝǀĂů
ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͘ůĂƌŐĞďĂƚĐŚŽĨƚŚĞƐĞŶĞǁďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ;ŵĂŝŶůLJŵŽĚĞƐƚƐŝŶŐůĞĨĂŵŝůLJŚŽŵĞƐͿǁĞƌĞďƵŝůƚŝŶϭϵϬϯĚƵƌŝŶŐ
ƚŚĞďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͛ƐƵŐĂƌƌĞĨŝŶŝŶŐŝŶĚƵƐƚƌLJǁŚŝĐŚƐƚĂƌƚĞĚĂƌĂƉŝĚƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶŝŶĨůƵdžĂŶĚĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŵŝŶ
ƚŚĞĐŝƚLJ͘dŚŝƐŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶǁĂƐĚĞƌŝǀĞĚĨƌŽŵĂLJĞĂƌͲĞŶĚƐƵŵŵĂƌLJŽĨďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝŶĞĐĞŵďĞƌϭϵϬϯ͕ƉƵďůŝƐŚĞĚ
ŝŶƚŚĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ džƉƌĞƐƐͲŽƵƌŝĞƌ͘
tŚŝůĞKƌĂ>ŽŶŐƵŶĚŽƵďƚĞĚůLJĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŚŽŵĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŵĂũŽƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŝŶ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐĨƌŽŵϭϵϬϰ
ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϭϵϭϵ͕ƌĞĂĚŝůLJĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŝƐůĂĐŬŝŶŐĂŶĚǁŽƵůĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂďůĞƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚƚŽŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJ>ŽŶŐ͛Ɛ
ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚŝƐƚŝŵĞƉĞƌŝŽĚ͘,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉĞƌŵŝƚƌĞĐŽƌĚĚĂƚĂĐŽǀĞƌŝŶŐƚŚĞ
ƚŝŵĞƉĞƌŝŽĚĨƌŽŵϭϵϮϬƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞǀĞƌLJĞĂƌůLJϭϵϱϬƐĞŶĂďůĞĚƚŚĞŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨŵĂũŽƌ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͘/ƚŝƐǁŽƌƚŚŶŽƚŝŶŐƚŚĂƚŵĂŶLJƉŽƐƚͲϭϵϮϬďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉĞƌŵŝƚƐǁĞƌĞŝƐƐƵĞĚƚŽKƌĂ>ŽŶŐĨŽƌĂǀĂƌŝĞƚLJŽĨŽƚŚĞƌ
͞ůĞƐƐĞƌ͟ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐƌĞŵŽĚĞůŝŶŐ͕ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚŐĂƌĂŐĞƐ͘
ĚĚƌĞƐƐ WĞƌŵŝƚĂƚĞ KƌĂ>ŽŶŐ͛ƐZŽůĞ dLJƉĞŽĨƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
>ĂŬĞWĂƌŬ;͍͍Ϳ ϭϵϬϯ ŽǁŶĞƌ͕ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
ŽƌŶĞƌŽĨ^ƚŽǀĞƌΘ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ ϭϵϬϯ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
ŽƌŶĞƌŽĨ^ƚŽǀĞƌΘDLJƌƚůĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ ϭϵϬϯ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
͍͍^ŽƵƚŚ^ŚĞƌǁŽŽĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ϭϵϬϯ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
ϰϬϬtŚĞĚďĞĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ϭϵϬϯ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ĚǀĞŶƚŝƐƚŚƵƌĐŚ
ŽƌŶĞƌ^ƚŽǀĞƌΘDĂŐŶŽůŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ ϭϵϬϯ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
͍͍:ĞĨĨĞƌƐŽŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ϭϵϬϯ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ďƌŝĐŬŚŽƵƐĞ
͍͍ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ ϭϵϬϯ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ďƌŝĐŬŚŽƵƐĞ
͍͍tĞƐƚDŽƵŶƚĂŝŶǀĞŶƵĞ ϭϵϬϯ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
^͘ŽůůĞŐĞǀĞ͘;ŽůůĞŐĞΘ ůŝnjĂďĞƚŚ^ƚ͘ ϭϵϬϯ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
͍͍>ĂƉŽƌƚĞǀĞŶƵĞ ϭϵϬϯ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
͍͍ZĞŵŝŶŐƚŽŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ϭϵϬϰ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ͞DŽĚĞƌŶϭϰͲƌŽŽŵďƌŝĐŬƚĞƌƌĂĐĞ͟
ϳϬϴZĞŵŝŶŐƚŽŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ϭϵϮϮ ŽǁŶĞƌ͕ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
ϮϮϱ^͘ŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞ ϭϵϮϮ ŽǁŶĞƌ͕ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ƌŵƐƚƌŽŶŐ,ŽƚĞů
ϮϮϬ ĂƐƚ>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚ ϭϵϮϮ ŽǁŶĞƌ͕ďƵŝůĚĞƌ >ŽŶŐƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ
ϭϮϬϬ^͘ŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞ ϭϵϮϯ ŽǁŶĞƌ͕ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
ϭϯϬϭtĞƐƚDŽƵŶƚĂŝŶǀĞŶƵĞ ϭϵϮϯ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
ϯϬϴ^ŽƵƚŚ,ŽǁĞƐ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ϭϵϮϯ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
ϭϰϭϵ^ŽƵƚŚŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞ ϭϵϮϰ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
ϱϬϯ^͘tŚŝƚĐŽŵď^ƚƌĞĞƚ ϭϵϮϰ ŽǁŶĞƌ͕ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
ϭϯϰϵ^ŽƵƚŚŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞ ϭϵϮϱ ŽǁŶĞƌ͕ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
ϰϭϰ^ĞĐŽŶĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ƵĐŬŝŶŐŚĂŵ ϭϵϮϲ ďƵŝůĚĞƌ͕ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝŶƐƉĞĐƚŽƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
ϯϯϱ ůŝnjĂďĞƚŚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ϭϵϮϴ ŽǁŶĞƌ͕ďƵŝůĚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞ
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 133
220 E Laurel – Appeal
Landmark Preservation Commission Requests for Additional Information
Yellow/green = staff; no highlight = applicant
1. Please provide an electronic copy of the landscape plan that can be enlarged without becoming
blurry. Please make sure the text can be clearly read.
I have attached this to this email. It is the pdf that was supplied by the landscape designer. It can take a
minute to fully load. Let me know if you would prefer I have a paper copy printed for you all. I will need
to hear back asap if you want a paper copy by noon on Monday as we have to request this from the
print shop by 1:30 today to make that deadline.
Yes, if this can still happen, a print copy would be very helpful!
GREAT! I'LL DROP OFF TODAY.
2. On this landscape plan, please label everything – there is confusion about what the different symbols
denote.
This was all prepped by the landscape designer. The legend clearly notates the symbols to the plant
species. I am assuming it was the clarify of the image that caused confusion. Please take a look at what is
attached and let me know if there is confusion on plants or more of the hardscape call outs? That is all
located on the plan themselves.
The confusion is the hardscape call outs; what are they/what materials are proposed/what are
their size/which serve a specific purpose, and which are decorative/will they be patterned or
colored in any way?
I UPDATED THE PLANS A BIT MORE, IT IS HAND DRAWN AS WE ALREADY HAD SUBMITTED THEM
FOR PRINT. MORE DETAILS WERE ADDED. PAVERS ARE ~36X12. DIMENSION IS SUBJECT TO
CHANGE DEPENDING ON WHAT IS SOURCED. FOR INSTANCE WE MAY PUT TWO STONES
TOGETHER TO GET THE FINAL PAVER. ITEM TO NOTE FOR DESIGN IS WE ARE FOCUSING ON A
RECTANGULAR SHAPE WITH A NATURAL LOOK AND FEEL TO FINISH. NO BRIGHT COLORS OR
STAINS.
GARDEN BOX IN BACK PATIO IS SCALED, ~2’X9’
3. On the landscape plans, please provide information showing exactly what is existing and what is
proposed.
All is new with the exception of the larger trees in the easement between sidewalks and street and the
concrete patio in front of the addition. Both of those elements will receive no change. No changes to the
physical structure of the building with the exception of the alterations in the application. I noted on
plans.
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10
LPC Requests - Added 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 133-1
I think the question was about how much of the area that is turf would remain turf, and where
those turf areas would be. A readable landscape plan should answer this.
AGREED. NO MORE DETAILS PROVIDED
4. The Commission would like to see material samples of the hardscape materials, i.e., the pavers,
other?
Specific pavers have not been selected as of yet. It will be a natural stone using the approximate
dimensions on the plans. Here is an example of what we are thinking in a more visual representation
Before a Certificate of Appropriateness can be issued for that item, we will need to have the
exact materials and plans. However, the Commission can approve an item with the stipulation
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10
LPC Requests - Added 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 133-2
that the approval is based on staff receiving and reviewing the plans, etc. to ensure they do not
vary significantly from what the Commission approves. Staff’s error; conceptual plans may be
discussed by the Commission, but approval can only be made on final plans.
THE IMAGE I PREVIOUSLY ATTACHED IS THE BEST WE CAN DO RIGHT NOW, AS THE EXACT
STONE HAS NOT BEEN SOURCED AND THE OWNERS DO NOT WANT TO INVEST ANY MORE
MONEY IN LANDSCAPE DESIGN UNTIL WE GET AN APPROVAL. THEY HAVE ALREADY SPENT
$2600 ON THESE PLANS.
5. Need detailed information on what is wrong with the doors and windows you want to replace. Show
in photos or be prepared to explain their condition/why they need to be replaced.
Okay compiling this. Does this need to be in by noon on Monday or is this something that needs to just
be ready to present?
If the Commission does not have the time to be able to adequately review the information you
supply at the meeting, they will table the item (or may just deny it). Best is to provide your info
on Monday, so it can be included in the update we send to the Commission, and then re-iterate
again at the meeting during your presentation.
SINGLE PANE WINDOWS THAT HAVE BEEN PAINTED (TIME HAS BEEN PUT IN TO MAKE THE
OPERATE BETTER, STILL DEFECTIVE) . EFFICIENCY IS LACKING AND OPERATION IS VERY POUR.
OWNERS INVESTED MONEY IN THE ORIGINAL BUILDING TO REPAIR THOSE WINDOWS AS THEY
ARE THE OLD WEIGHTED WINDOWS. THIS ADDITION ORIGINALLY HAD A CHEAP WINDOW
INSTALLED WITH AN ALUMINUM TRACK (DOES NOT MATCH ORIGINAL 1920 BUILDING). DOOR
HAS HAD DAMAGE AND POOR CARE OVER THE YEARS. THE FUNCTION OF THIS SPACE NO
LONGER REQUIRES A PRIVACY DOOR, RATHER A MORE INVITING DOOR THAT BRINGS MORE
NATURAL LIGHT IS PREFERRED AS IT WILL NOW FUNCTION AS AN ON SITE FITNESS ROOM FOR
THE TENANTS. NATURAL LIGHT IS GOOD FOR THE SOUL. FOR AESTHETICS AND FUNCTION WE
WANT TO REPLACE BOTH THE WINDOW AND DOOR.
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10
LPC Requests - Added 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 133-3
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10
LPC Requests - Added 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 133-4
6. If you are hoping to have the LPC consider the fencing and dumpster screen, you will need to provide
complete information: materials, design, locations, color. Alternatively, staff can review these items
whenever you have the necessary information pulled together.
Now included on landscape plan attached.
Be prepared to talk about the concrete bench, and firepit(?), and anything else that’s not easily
moved. The Certificate of Appropriateness I issued for the back courtyard does not include
those. Be sure to bring up ANY extra items on the property that you want to do.
REQUESTING MORE DETAILS ON THE APPROVED COURTYARD IS NEWS TO ME. I REREAD THE
LETTER OF APPROPRIATENESS AND NO WERE DOES IT SAY WORK IS CONDITIONAL.HAVING THIS
BROUGHT UP LAST MINUTE IS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW THE COMMUNICATIONS AND
REQUIREMENTS SEEM TO BE SUBJECTIVE. LETTER MAKES IS SOUDN THAT WORK IS APPROVES
AS WAS IDENTIFIED IN THE SUBMITTED PLANS. FULL DESIGN HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED ON
THIS. I HAVE ATTACHED A FEW INSPIRATION IMAGES TO HELP DEVELOP THE DESIGN. IT WILL BE
A COMBINATION OF CONCRETE AND WOOD FOR THE BENCHES, AND A STEEL OF SOME SORT
FOR THE FIREPLACE. THESE WOULD BE A CUSTOM PIECES WITH A HIGHER INVESTMENT
AMOUNT. THE FULL DESIGN WILL TAKE TIME. OWNERS AGAIN WERE HOPING TO NOT INVEST
ANY MORE MONEY IN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT UNTIL APPROVAL WAS GRANTED. CAN THE SAME
EXCEPTION APPLY AS THE PAVERS? STAFF TO REVIEW?
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10
LPC Requests - Added 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 133-5
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10
LPC Requests - Added 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 133-6
7. Also, are you adding the decorative screen anywhere else other than the one spot by the alley?
NO, THIS WILL BE THE ONLY LOCATION.
8. Please label the garage doors on the more detailed site/landscape plan.
Now included on landscape plan attached
Thanks.
9. Please provide a strong rationale for painting the brick.
This is a tough one. We understand and appreciate original brick very much. However as we have
developed a vision to honor the past while bringing relevance to the building as a whole we are
constantly stuck with the Architectural influences of the addition not pairing well with the original
building. Color and tone of the brick play a role in the aesthetic realm. The brick shade is off slightly in
color, joint pattern, and texture. In addition, the window/door header, window sill, and brick detail on
the walking doors is the most significant deficiency of the addition, and what we dislike most. The
original shows a tan brick outline and detail that we love on the header and sill of the window as well as
an outline around the door, but this element is missing entirely from the addition. The header height of
the 1950’s addition window does not match the existing height. Drawing attention to a disproportionate
roof line. We presume that is because they choose to do a sunken room rather than match the floor
height and window height of the original buildings first floor. Further, the addition window and door are
from circa 1950. Because the selected materials for the 1950’s addition do not match the original or
even attempt to copy it, it cheapens the Architecture and appears to have less than well crafted
materials. We don’t want this addition to tarnish the original as a close but deficient replica, we would
rather allow for more room in Architectural styling drawing more attention to the finish color than the
deficient exempts to match material. Very similar in the elements of the brick material itself, but lacking
consistency as a corrective copy to the original in many other forms as I listed above. Causing confusion
to the eye and an overall displeasure with the Exterior Architecture. These conditions in combination are
what has brought us to want to paint the brick. We think that changing the color while allowing the
texture to remain the same will give the building a nice juxtaposition and allow the viewer to not
critique and determine how the building is close but missing the mark, but rather appreciate both
structures and accept how they can be appropriately joined.
Thanks.
I ATTACHED A PHOTO BETTER DETAILING THE MISMATCHED BRICK + JOINTS.
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10
LPC Requests - Added 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 133-7
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10
LPC Requests - Added 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 133-8
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 11
Revised Landscape Plans - Added 8-20-19
Packet Pg. 133-9
Agenda Item 4
Item 4, Page 1
STAFF REPORT August 21, 2019
Landmark Preservation Commission
PROJECT NAME
LINDEN STREET IMPROVEMENTS – DESIGN REVIEW
STAFF
Maren Bzdek, Senior Historic Preservation Planner
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create a “convertible” street on Linden Street from Walnut to Jefferson, combining
roadway, on-street parking, pedestrian walkways, event space, placemaking
elements, and artwork.
APPLICANT/OWNER: City of Fort Collins Engineering Department (Kyle Lambrecht); Ditesco (Keith
Meyer); Russell Mills Studios (Craig Russell)
RECOMMENDATION: N/A
ROLE OF LPC: Conceptual review is the first phase of the design review hearing and is an opportunity for the
applicant to discuss requirements, standards, design issues, and policies that apply to designated resources
with the Commission. Conceptual review of any proposed alteration may be limited to certain portions of the
work as deemed appropriate by the Commission. This is the Commission’s first discussion of the proposed
work on Linden Street in the Old Town Historic District. Only the overall street configuration scheme will be
discussed at this phase of review; design details of specific features, materials, artwork, etc. will be reviewed in
the next design phase.
ALTERATION HISTORY: The roadway, pedestrian walkways, and other features of Linden Street have been
altered multiple times over its history to support modernization of the streetscape. The most recent alterations
occurred in 1995. These alterations over time have maintained the general pattern of use zones for
commercial, pedestrian, and vehicular activity.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK: The design team has been working with four street alternatives (A,
B, C, and A-1) in a stakeholder outreach process that is now underway. The design concepts provide a range
of treatments with varying parking configurations.
PUBLIC COMMENTS SUMMARY:
Please see the summary chart of stakeholder input on page 3 of the attached applicant submittal document.
EVALUATION OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:
Applicable
Code
Standard
Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Standard
Met (Y/N)
Packet Pg. 134
Agenda Item 4
Item 4, Page 2
SOI #1
A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires
minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial
relationships;
All four alternatives maintain the basic features, spaces, and spatial
relationships of the historic streetscape, which has evolved and modernized
since the late 19th century.
TBD
SOI #2
The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The
removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial
relationships that characterize a property will be avoided.
All four alternatives maintain the overall character of the space as a public
circulation corridor. Distinctive features, such as sandstone sidewalk pavers will
remain undisturbed under staff’s current understanding of the project.
TBD
SOI #3
Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and
use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as
adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not
be undertaken.
The conceptual proposal does not suggest alterations that would mimic historic
features, but this Standard should be carefully considered during the
finalization of design and feature details for the project.
TBD
SOI #4
Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right
will be retained and preserved.
While the existing sidewalks, pavers, and road surface will be altered, the
changes do not extend to historic features for any of the landmarked structures.
The sandstone sidewalk pavers in front of Nature’s Own (The Linden Hotel) will
remain undisturbed, as staff understands the proposed work.
TBD
SOI #5 Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or
examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.
See above, Standard #4. Historic pavement is of primary concern and will be
preserved where it exists.
TBD
SOI #6 Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the
severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new
feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible,
materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by
documentary and physical evidence.
N/A
SOI #7
Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the
gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials
will not be used.
The project should include a comprehensive Plan of Protection for the historic
resources in the district, to be added as plans are finalized.
TBD
SOI #8
Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such
resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.
The recent experience with the discovery of historic trolley tracks and brick
pavers during the Walnut Street improvements is instructive; City staff should
TBD
Packet Pg. 135
Agenda Item 4
Item 4, Page 3
consult with the LPC and Historic Preservation staff before construction begins
to anticipate a similar appropriate process of documentation and retrieval of
historic materials, should that become necessary.
SOI #9
New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy
historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be
differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size,
scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property
and its environment.
See Standard #4 above regarding sandstone pavers.
TBD
SOI #10
New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in
such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of
the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.
This Standard emphasizes the importance of maintaining the general
streetscape pattern so that any future alterations would be similarly in keeping
with the historic pattern of development and any reversals of these alterations
would be relatively straightforward.
TBD
OTDS 4.4
Retain the historic network of streets and alleys. The network of streets and
alleys shall be retained as public circulation space and for maximum public
access. Streets and alleys shall not be enclosed or closed to public access.
Link a new walkway to an existing public right-of-way.
Conceptual designs indicate that the network of streets, alleys, and circulation
space will be preserved.
TBD
OTDS 4.5
A small public plaza or courtyard shall contain features to promote and
enhance its use. It must be: directly accessible to the public way; level with the
public way; it may have one or all of the following: street furniture, public art,
historical/interpretive marker.
Conceptual designs indicate that the public spaces planned into the street
alterations will be level with the public way and will include street furniture in the
form of moveable furniture and seatwalls in new planters.
TBD
OTDS 4.7
Locate an at-grade dining area to minimize impacts on the streetscape. Locate
an at-grade dining area to the side or rear of a property. It is permissible to
locate an at-grade dining area in the public ROW in a street wall context,
subject to any necessary permits or encroachment agreements which may be
required. The dining area shall be clearly defined in this setting.
Conceptual designs suggest expansion of at-grade dining areas while also
extending the public circulation space. Permitting for owners to build definitions
(fencing, etc.) to these dining areas that are consistent with applicable
standards would be needed at a later date.
TBD
OTDS 4.24
Minimize the visual impact of security devices.
Should any permanent infrastructure be installed at the intersection to provide
flexible gating for events, it should follow this standard.
TBD
OTDS 4.29
Leave archeological resources in place, to the maximum extent feasible. Avoid
disturbing known archeological resources.
See SOI Standard #8 above.
TBD
Agenda Item 4
Item 4, Page 4
INDEPENDENT EVALUATION SUMMARY
Staff has not sought input from History Colorado (the State Historic Preservation Office) or from independent
experts on this project.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
In evaluating the proposed alternatives for alterations to Linden Street within the Old Town Historic District,
staff makes the following findings of fact:
• The proposed alternatives incorporate several key principles for meeting the Standards, especially
maintaining the historic use of the space (SOI #1), preserving the historic character of the space (SOI
#2), and preserving distinctive features and characteristics (SOI #5).
• The degree to which the preferred alternative meets the Standards will be evaluated in greater detail at
the next phase of review.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Staff Presentation
2. Applicant Presentation
Packet Pg. 137
Linden Street Improvements: Design Review 1
Maren Bzdek, Senior Historic Preservation Planner
Landmark Preservation Commission, August 21, 2019
Old Town Historic District
“Convertible Street” = roadway + on-street
parking + pedestrian walkways +
flexible event space
1979: Old Town Historic District est.
1998: Public ROW are part of the historic
district, subject to review (Ord. 102, 1998)
2014: Old Town Design Standards adopted
2
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1
Packet Pg. 138
Existing Conditions: 2018
3
Existing Conditions: 2018
4
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1
Packet Pg. 139
LPC Role: Conceptual Review
Review project alternatives regarding compliance with adopted standards
5
Linden Street Improvements: Design Review 6
Maren Bzdek, Senior Historic Preservation Planner
Landmark Preservation Commission, August 21, 2019
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1
Packet Pg. 140
Page 1 of 3
2133 S. Timberline Road, Suite 110
Fort Collins, CO 80525
ditescoservices.com
Delivery by email to:
klambrecht@fcgov.com
mbzdek@fcgov.com
PROJECT SUBMITTAL
DATE: August 2, 2019
TO: Landmark Preservation Commission
FROM: City of Fort Collins Engineering Department – Kyle Lambrecht, PE
Ditesco – Keith Meyer, PE
Russell Mills Studios – Craig Russell
RE: Linden Street Renovation Project
Introduction
The Linden Street Renovation project (Linden Street) spans from Walnut Street to Jefferson Street and is intended
to transform the roadway into a “convertible” street, allowing the space to be multi-functional. While acting primarily
as a roadway, with on-street parking and pedestrian walkways, the new design will support large and small events,
additional artwork, placemaking elements, and connect Old Town Square to the River District. The project has six
primary goals:
Bridge the Gap – make the connection from Old Town to the River District while maintaining the unique
character of each.
Flexible Space – create a space that is flexible and can support year-round events.
Economic Vitality – ensure economic vitality for the area both during and after construction activities.
Partnerships – maintain and enhance partnerships with the City, DDA, DBA and local business owners to
ensure project success.
World Class Experience – create an experience that envelops sustainable techniques; creates a design
that seamlessly blends the spaces and creates a place that drives interest and people traffic; creates a
construction plan that is phased to minimize impacts and honors business operations.
Honoring the Past – develop a historical context in our project design elements that are consistent with
the Downtown Plan and historical considerations.
In 2014, the Downtown Development Authority (DDA) hosted design charettes with multiple stakeholders to
understand options to improve the 200 block of Linden Street. From this effort, the City added the project to the
Capital Improvements Ballot initiative (Building on Basics 2) which was approved by the Fort Collins voters in the
fall of 2015. As envisioned through the early design charette process and as approved by City Council as part of
the budgeting process, the convertible street concept would convert one-half of the block to parallel parking and
one-half would remain as diagonal parking. The street design concept would include wider sidewalks with a focus
on pedestrian movements, site amenities and additional landscaping. The street cross section would consist of
architectural pavers without curb and gutter to create a plaza space that functioned like a street most of the time.
The project schedule was defined to include a design phase throughout 2019 into early 2020 with construction
throughout 2020.
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 141
Page 2 of 3
Context
Recognizing that Ordinance 102, 1998, clarified and added public rights of way to the historical district as outlined
in the excerpt below, the City is submitting this preliminary submittal to the Landmark Preservation Commission
(LPC) for initial feedback, review and comment.
The design team has taken unique care to understand historical use of the public right of way. Linden Street has
historically been used in a variety of ways to support travel, business customer use (retail and commercial),
residential and for events (parades, celebrations and community gatherings). Exhibits A, B and C provide context
for these uses. As seen in these images, the street supported parades, pedestrian, horse, wagon, buggy, trolley
and vehicular use. Parking occurred in parallel, diagonal and perpendicular arrangements as the public right of
way was wide and accommodating. Sidewalks were earthen, boardwalk, sandstone and concrete. Pavement was
earthen, asphalt and concrete.
In 1995, the General Improvement District (GID) and the City funded and constructed the Linden Street
Improvements project which removed the sidewalks and roadway across the entire right of way (building face to
building face) improving the pedestrian space while retaining on street diagonal parking and travel lanes.
Design Concepts and Public Outreach
The initial 2019 design concepts focused on creating framework diagrams of the street space to understand uses
and space allocation. Framework diagrams were created for four (4) street alternatives. Each is described below.
Please find these attached as Exhibits D, E, F, G and H.
Alternative A: The base concept as envisioned through the 2014-2015 DDA design charette and as
approved by City Council and Fort Collins voters. Includes widened sidewalks and parallel
parking for one-half of the block; narrower sidewalks and diagonal parking for one-half of
the block.
Alternative B: This concept focused on enhancing the intersection nodes at Walnut, Old Fire House Alley
and Jefferson Street. It retained the sidewalk and parking configuration as exists today.
Alternative C: This concept maintains a focus on the intersection nodes while adding intermediate
landscaping islands to break up the diagonal parking arrangement.
Alternative A-1: During the stakeholder engagement process (one on one meetings with business and
property owners; open house workshop), stakeholders requested the City evaluate a full
parallel parking option widening the sidewalks along the entire 200 block of Linden.
The stakeholder engagement process is still underway. Through the date of this submittal, the project team has
received the following feedback through meetings and an open house.
Public Outreach Summary
Total Property/Business Owners Contacted 41
Total Meetings with Property/Business Owners 36
Total Surveys Distributed 35
Total Surveys Received 11
Total Attendees at Open House 53
Total Respondents (Open House & Surveys) 60
* Only property/business owners in the project limits were surveyed
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 142
Page 3 of 3
Public Opinion Results Open House Property/Business Owner
Survey
Alternative Selection Count Percentage Count Percentage
Alternative A 28 62% 11 73%
Alternative A-1 14 31% * see below -
Alternative B 3 7% 3 20%
Alternative C - - 1 7%
* Alternative A-1 (full parallel parking) was supported by 13 business and property owners along
the block
While the base concept (Alternative A) has large support, the City is further evaluating Alternative A-1 with a look to
the future envisioning a stronger pedestrian connection to the River District. Schematic design alternatives for both
Alternative A and A-1 are contained within this submittal as Exhibits I, J, K and L.
Review of Design Submittal
Being located in the Downtown Historic District, the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic
Properties and Guidelines for the Treatment of Cultural Landscapes (Guidelines) form the basis for this project
review. These guidelines outline treatments for cultural landscape rehabilitation which acknowledge the need to
alter or add to a cultural landscape to meet continuing or new uses while retaining the landscape’s historic
character.
Ordinance 102, 1998:
The City of Fort Collins Engineering Department and its design team have started the early process to appropriately
address compatibility of schematic design options with the Guidelines. In our final submittal to the LPC we expect
to evaluate the final design option with the Guideline Approach categories and performance measures.
Requested Commission Action:
The City requests review of the design alternatives for the space and initial input to the preferred alternatives A and
A-1. From this, the City expects to further refine the design concepts for final LPC approval of the design in
September or October 2019. The City expects to complete the design in 2019 and begin construction in the first
quarter of 2020.
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 143
LPC Meeting Linden Street Renovations
Exhibit A
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 144
LPC Meeting Linden Street Renovations
Exhibit B
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 145
LPC Meeting Linden Street Renovations
Exhibit C
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 146
LPC Meeting
WALNUT STREET
JEFFERSON STREET
Potential expanded patios, typ.
Event tent area Potential quarter block event space
* Potential loss of parking adjacent
to event area
Potential mid block closure
Potential mid block event space
Full block event space
Goal to maintain sidewalk access Full block closure
to businesses during event
Integrated barricade/
gateway feature
Expand bulb-out and minimize sidewalk
width at Walnut Street crossing
Integrated barricade/
gateway feature
PARKING TOTALS:
EXISTING PARKING - 58
TOTAL PARKING SHOWN - 45
NET LOSS - 13
Linden Street Renovations
0 20 40 80’
Alternative A - Site Framework Opportunities
Exhibit D
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 147
LPC Meeting
WALNUT STREET
JEFFERSON STREET
Potential expanded patios, typ.
Event tent area Potential quarter block event space
Potential mid block closure
Potential mid block event space
Full block event space
Goal to maintain sidewalk access to Full block closure
businesses during event
Integrated barricade/
gateway feature
Expand bulb-out and minimize sidewalk
width at Walnut Street crossing
Integrated barricade/
gateway feature
PARKING TOTALS:
EXISTING PARKING - 58
TOTAL PARKING SHOWN - 56
NET LOSS - 2
Linden Street Renovations
Alternative B - Site Framework Opportunities
0 20 40 80’
Exhibit E
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 148
LPC Meeting
WALNUT STREET
JEFFERSON STREET
Potential expanded patios, typ.
Event tent area Potential quarter block event space
Columnar tree in grate - area to
be paved to designate no parking
Potential mid block closure
Potential mid block event space
Full block event space
Goal to maintain sidewalk access Full block closure
to businesses during event
Integrated barricade/
gateway feature
Expand bulb-out and minimize sidewalk
width at Walnut Street crossing
Integrated barricade/
gateway feature
PARKING TOTALS:
EXISTING PARKING - 58
TOTAL PARKING SHOWN - 48
NET LOSS - 10
Linden Street Renovations
0 20 40 80’
Alternative C - Site Framework Opportunities
Exhibit F
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 149
LPC Meeting
WALNUT STREET
JEFFERSON STREET
Potential expanded patios, typ.
Event tent area Potential quarter block event space
* Potential loss of parking adjacent
to event area
Potential mid block closure
Potential mid block event space
Full block event space
Goal to maintain sidewalk access Full block closure
to businesses during event
Integrated barricade/
gateway feature
Expand bulb-out and minimize sidewalk
width at Walnut Street crossing
Integrated barricade/
gateway feature
PARKING TOTALS:
EXISTING PARKING - 58
TOTAL PARKING SHOWN - 28
NET LOSS - 30
Linden Street Renovations
0 20 40 80’
Alternative A1 - Site Framework Opportunities
Exhibit G
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 150
LPC Meeting
JEFFERSON STREET
WALNUT STREET
Existing pedestrian circulation pattern
Parallel Parking Diagonal Parking
OLD FIREHOUSE ALLEY
Street Design Components
STREET FRAMEWORK EXPANDED PATIOS
EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES
PEDESTRIAN FLOW
PEDESTRIAN AND TIVOLI LIGHTS
DESTINATION AT INTERSECTION
Existing street tree, typ.
Proposed street tree, typ.
Sinuous circulation pattern - creates
interest as you walk along street
Potential extended patio zone
Adjusted patio fence around
existing trees
Proposed tivoli lighting, typ. Pedestrian level lighting, typ.
Similar to Old Town Square
Central node design feature at
intersection
Linden Street Renovations
Exhibit H
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 151
0 20 40 80’
LPC Meeting
Pre-cast concrete pavers, typ.
Overhead tivoli lighting
Proposed street trees
paver grate, typ.
Existing street trees
to remain, typ.
Planting area enlarged
at central node
Potential extended
patio zone
Potential Extended Patio Zone
Curb/gutter adjusted to
minimize crossing distance
across Walnut Street
Pavers across Walnut Street to
connect Old Town Square
Extend pavers across Jefferson
Street to connect to River District
Moveable game tables,
typ.
Moveable cafe tables/
seating, typ.
Moveable cafe tables/
seating w/ umbrellas, typ.
Bike rack, typ.
Entry gateway walls
w/ planter pots
Parallel parking stall - 14
from Walnut to alley Diagonal parking stall - 31
from alley to Jefferson Street
Central focal point - kinetic/lighting
feature
5DGLDOSDYHPHQWSDWWHUQVORZVWUDIğFQHDUDOOH\FURVVLQJ
JEFFERSON STREET
OLD FIREHOUSE ALLEY
WALNUT STREET
PARKING TOTALS:
EXISTING PARKING - 58
TOTAL PARKING SHOWN - 45
NET LOSS - 13
LED color spotlights
• Radial pattern tie to Old Town Square
• Sinuous walking path
• Curved shapes allow natural ped. movement
• Umbrella cafe seating/game tables added along streetscape
• Additional street trees
Linden Street Renovations
Overall Site Plan
Exhibit I
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 152
LPC Meeting
Proposed street trees
in planting area
Existing street trees
to remain, typ.
Moveable cafe tables/
seating w/ umbrellas, typ.
Potential event tent location, typ.
Pavers across Walnut Street
to connect Old Town Square
5HFRQğJXUHGSODQWLQJDUHDV
at corner to soften look
Low seatwall to act as
gateway onto Linden Street
Moveable game tables
Moveable cafe
tables/seating, typ.
Parallel parking stall - 14
from Walnut to alley Bike rack, typ.
Elliptical paver pattern connects to
Old Town Square pattern and form
Pre-cast concrete pavers, typ.
Overhead tivoli lighting
Central focal point - kinetic/
lighting feature
A A’
Extend Old Firehouse Alley pavement pattern
across street
Site Enlargement Plan
Entry gateway walls w/ planter pots
Potential Extended
Patio Zone
Potential Extended Patio Zone
Linden Street Renovations
Exhibit J
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 153
LPC Meeting
Potential
extended
patio zone
Potential
extended
patio zone
Pedestrian
circulation
zone
Seatwall w/
planting area
Parallel
parking stall
Parallel
parking stall
Event tent
zone
Ex
Street
Tree
3’ walking
area adjacent
to parking
stall, typ.
Travel lane
Existing street extents
Existing street extents
Travel lane
Section
Linden Street Renovations
Exhibit K
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 154
Sketch - Looking Northeast
LPC Meeting
Pedestrian Lighting and Kinetic lighting feature w/LED spotlights
Tivoli ties into Old Town
Square
Pedestrian Pavers Existing street
trees
Amenity Zone w/ Expanded patios
moveable tables +
chairs and planting
Linden Street Renovations
Exhibit L
ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 155
1
Linden Street Renovation Project
LPC Presentation August 21, 2019
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-1
Project Information
Project Limits
• Downtown 200 Block of Linden
Street
Project Schedule
• Design – 2019, Early 2020
• Construction – 2020 Season
2
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-2
Historical Use and Context
3
Parades, community gathering space,
retail and commercial use
Convertible Street Concept
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-3
Historical Use and Context
4
Parallel, perpendicular and diagonal
parking throughout the history of
Linden Street
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-4
Spatial Relationships
5
US Department of Interior's
Guidelines for the Treatment of
Cultural Landscapes
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-5
Existing Conditions – 1995 Improvements
6
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-6
Alternative A
7
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-7
Alternative A-1
8
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-8
Festive Street
9
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-9
Placemaking Elements
10
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-10
Placemaking Elements
11
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-11
Placemaking Elements
12
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-12
Placemaking Elements
13
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-13
Placemaking Elements
14
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-14
Cross Section
15
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-15
Festive Street
16
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-16
Festive Street
17
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-17
Design Considerations
18
Topography
• Historic drainage patterns; minimize maintenance
Vegetation
• Protect existing trees; focus on native perennials
Circulation
• Maintain patterns
- Storefront walkways; shared street; parallel parking
- Replace worn historic features with similar materials in texture, color, type
Structures
• Existing Conditions Survey
Special Considerations
• Accessibility, safety energy, environment
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-18
19
Contact Information
Keith Meyer, P.E.
Ditesco Project Manager
970-988-8605
keith.meyer@ditescoservices.com
Kyle Lambrecht, P.E.
COFC Project Manager
970-221-6566
klambrecht@fcgov.com
www.fcgov.com/engineering/linden-street-renovation
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-19
Backup slides
20
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-20
Project Timeline
2014
Downtown Development Authority (DDA) Design Charette
• Recommends Alternative A (parallel/diagonal parking option)
2015
Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO) and Community Capital
Improvements (CCIP) Tax Initiative
• $3.8M awarded to project through support of Council and the
Community
• Envisioned a more vibrant pedestrian oriented urban street
• Further refinement of Alternative A based on public input
2017 Firehouse Alley Parking Garage Constructed
2019 Project Design Begins
21
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-21
Project Goals
22
“Bridge the
Gap”
Flexible
Space
Economic
Vitality
Partnerships
World Class
Experience
Complement
Past/Plan for
Future
Linden
Street
Renovations
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-22
Project Inspiration
23
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-23
Outreach Summary
24
Statistics – Linden Street
• Owners Contacted – 41
• Total Meetings – 36
• Surveys Distributed – 35
• Surveys Returned – 15
Statistics – Open House
• Attendees – 53
• Attendee Feedback – 50
Total Respondents - 65
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-24
Alternative Preference
25
Based on
Public
Feedback,
Alternative A-1
was added
73%
22%
7%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Linden Street Property/Business
Owners
Alternative A Alternative B
Alternative C
56%
28%
16%
0%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Open House Attendees
Alternative A Alternative A-1
Alternative B Alternative C
ITEM 4, EXHIBIT 1
Applicant Presentation - submitted at hearing
Packet Pg. 155-25
Packet Pg. 136
ZĞǀ͘ϵͬϵϴ
K>KZKh>dhZ>Z ^KhZ ^hZs z
ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ&Žƌŵ
,7(0$77$&+0(17
Packet Pg. 97
"'#
''9
• #"'(&)( '&"'(# !"' #"(#' (+ ( !$&#*'( ( -
$ "( "*(( #"2
•
"'( &"#""#&( ' # #((#$&#* ((&$& *-(#(""('( (+
" #- "( !$&#* $( #2
• &($)&$#') #!!)" (-'$#"
3'( #"# #((#" "(""(!" ( '
"#!!)" * "28
#(* ' (#$) 92
#)!"(( #"#&* +
#(#D5=>6
, '( "#" ( #"'2
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 63
'-'(!'+ ( "(#& "!#& "-"((&
$&#&!"2'+#!(##!$ ( #"#( "(& #&'( ,(& #& '#!$ !$&#*!"('"
(# &(2
( '( # #( #+"&' $(# #"#&( '(#& "()&#( #& " ) "+ $&#*
)"( #" "$$ "&' "#&(""(&("( #"'2 ( ( "&' "# (#+"&' "(
#!!& $&(!"(#!$ ,* #$!"(0'!"'(#$&#((( #+"&' $' "*'(!"(( # #+ "
' "$&#$#'1
=2 $ , '( " "#+F##&#"#)( *( #"F "(=EC< ( #"+ (2&#!#)& " "'/( '
'( #"#( ) "+'() -"#"5$&! (( ( #"( (+' "( =EC<2, '( "
+ "#+#" ( #"'1#'"#(!( , '( "#& " ) "/ (-(##$"/"&$##& "
"-2
#)!"(( #"#&&* +4
#(#"#2=5& " ) " &
=E@E0"#' ) "(( 2
'#)&1 # #*& *'
#(#"#2>5
!$#'( ( #" &
=EC<0) " '"2#& "
+ ( ) "$&(!"("
&'
&#!#!!)" (-* #$!"(+&
#"(((# "%) &#)(,(-&
# ( #"2 && *' "#(
*) "$&! (#" 2 #''(
( "' #)"+'&## "$&! (
'') "=EC@2 #"+ ( ( '+'
&##$&! ( '')=ED<#&! "
) "&5&##2
ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 60
EHGURRP± VSDFHV [ VSDFHV
7KUHH
EHGURRP VSDFHV [ VSDFHV
%HGURRPV2YHUDOO 6SDFHV5HT
G
VSDFHVSURYLGHG
([LVWLQJ
6WRU\%XLOGLQJ
%HGURRP
%HGURRP
3URSRVHGSDUNLQJVSDFHV
)RUW&ROOLQV/DQG8VH&RGH
=RQLQJ && &RPPXQLW\&RPPHUFLDO'LVWULFW
/RFDWHGZLWKLQWKH72'
5HVLGHQWLDO8VHLVFRQVLGHUHG6HFRQGDU\8VH
3HUPLWWHG8VH 5HQWDO+RXVHV
RUIHZHU
$GPLQLVWUDWLYH5HYLHZ 5HQWDO+RXVHV
RUIHZHU
'LPHQVLRQDO6WDQGDUGV
%XLOGLQJ)URQWDJH PLQLPXP
0D[LPXPKHLJKW 6WRULHV
KHLJKWPLQLPXP
%XLOGLQJ6LGH6HWEDFNV IHHW
%XLOGLQJ5HDU6HWEDFN#$OOH\ IHHW
/DQGVFDSH6LGH6HWEDFN$UHD IHHW
,QWHUQDWLRQDO%XLOGLQJ&RGH
2FFXSDQF\ 5 0XOWL)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
&RQVWUXFWLRQ7\SH 9%VSULQNOHUHG 3
6WRULHV 6WRULHV
0D[LPXPEXLOGLQJKHLJKW IW
7\SLFDO
3URSRVHG
6WRU\%XLOGLQJ
%HGURRP
%HGURRP
([LVWLQJ3DUNLQJ/RW
([LVWLQJ
)URQW
(QWULHV
1HZ
)URQW
(QWULHV
3URSRVHG
6WRUPZDWHU
6ZDOH
6FDOH
3URMHFWQXPEHU
'DWH
'UDZQE\
&KHFNHGE\
$5&+,7(&76
30
$5&+6
$UFKLWHFWXUDO6LWH3ODQ
+RZHV
6+RZHV6WUHHW 6$
)RUW&ROOLQV&2
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
/3&:RUN6HVVLRQ&RPPHQWV
3URSRVHG
6WRUPZDWHUU
6ZDOH
6SDFHV5HT
G
VSDFHVSURYLGHG G
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 3
Applicant Response to LPC Requests
Added 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-17
)LUVW)ORRU3ODQ
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
/3&:RUN6HVVLRQ&RPPHQWV
6HFRQG)ORRU
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 3
Applicant Response to LPC Requests
Added 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-16
(DVW(OHYDWLRQ :HVW(OHYDWLRQ
1RUWK(OHYDWLRQ
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 3
Applicant Response to LPC Requests
Added 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-15
$FRPPHUFLDOEXLOGLQJRQ:0\UWOH6WWKDWLVMXVWQRUWK
DORQJWKHDOOH\ZD\DGMDFHQWWRWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFW:LQGRZVDQG
GRRUVZLWKJODVVZLOOEHLQFOXGHGZLWKLQWKHILHOGRIVWRQHIRUQDWXUDO
GD\OLJKWLQJHJUHVVDQGWRDLGLQWKHRYHUDOOPDVVLQJ
6WRQHKDVEHHQVHOHFWHGWRUHIHUHQFHWKHKLVWRULFPDWHULDOVXVHGIRU
IRXQGDWLRQVLQWKHQHLJKERUKRRGLQFOXGLQJFRORUDQGVFDOHRIWKHVWRQH
$GGLWLRQDOO\ODSVLGLQJDQGERDUG EDWWHQVLGLQJKDVEHHQVHOHFWHGWR
UHIHUHQFHWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQRIGHWDFKHGJDUDJHVIRXQGDORQJWKHEDFN
DOOH\ZD\7KHGHVLJQXVHVWKHODSVLGLQJWRSURYLGHDVHQVHRILGHQWLW\
WRHDFKKDOIRIWKHGXSOH[DQGDLGLQWKHRYHUDOOPDVVLQJVWUXFWXUH
)DFDGH'HWDLOV
:LQGRZVRQWKHH[LVWLQJKRPHVLQWKHQHLJKERUKRRGYDU\LQ
SURSRUWLRQVFDOHDQGVW\OH7KHLQWHQWLVWRXVHZLQGRZVL]HVDQG
SURSRUWLRQVWKDWDUHVLPLODUWRWKHDGMDFHQWKRPHVWRWKHSURSRVHG
SURMHFW
,QWKHPDVVLQJRIWKHSURMHFWWKHWUDQVLWLRQIURPWKHEDVHVWRQH
PDWHULDOWRWKHVLGLQJDWWKHVHFRQGIORRULVEDVHGRQWKHVRIILWKHLJKWV
RQWKHH[LVWLQJVWUXFWXUHDQGWKHDGMDFHQWKRPHVRQHDFKVLGH7KH
XSSHUVRIILWKDVEHHQGHVLJQHGWRDOLJQZLWKWKHH[LVWLQJVWUXFWXUHDV
ZHOOZLWKVLPLODURYHUKDQJGHSWKV
9LVLELOLW\RI+LVWRULF)HDWXUHV
7KHSURSRVHGQHZFRQVWUXFWLRQZLOOEHGHWDFKHGDQGVHWEDFNIURP
WKHH[LVWLQJVWUXFWXUHWRPDLQWDLQWKHLQWHJULW\RIWKHH[LVWLQJKRPH
7KLVLVWRDOORZWKHVWUHHWYLHZIURP+RZHV6WUHHWWRUHPDLQLQLWV
FXUUHQWH[LVWLQJVWDWHZLWKPLQLPDOVLWHOLQHVRIWKHQHZVWUXFWXUHRQ
WKHEDFNRIWKHORW
6LWH)HDWXUHV /DQGVFDSLQJ
7KHH[LVWLQJWUHHVRQWKHSURSRVHGORWDUHSODQQHGWRUHPDLQZKLOH
QHLJKERULQJWUHHVZLOOEHWULPPHGDVQHHGHGGXULQJFRQVWUXFWLRQ
7KHFRXUW\DUGZLOOEHODQGVFDSHGDVDFRPPRQVSDFHIRUUHVLGHQFHWR
VKDUH7KHILQDOGHVLJQZLOOEHGHWHUPLQHGEDVHGRQWKHUHTXLUHGVWRUP
GUDLQDJHGHVLJQ
6FDOH
3URMHFWQXPEHU
'DWH
'UDZQE\
&KHFNHGE\
$5&+,7(&76
$VLQGLFDWHG
30
$5&+
'9LHZV +LVWRULF6XPPDU\
+RZHV
6+RZHV6WUHHW 6$
)RUW&ROOLQV&2
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
/3&:RUN6HVVLRQ&RPPHQWV
+LVWRULF &XOWXUDO6XPPDU\
(RZHV6W[LVWLQJ6WUHHW9LHZ +RZHV6W 3URSRVHG9LHZIURP+
([LVWLQJ)URQW +RZHV
(OHYDWLRQ ([LVWLQJ5HDU(OHYDWLRQ
7KHVHFRQGIORRUFDQWLOHYHUVRXWRYHUWKHJURXQGIORRUWRSURYLGH
VKHOWHUHGRSHQLQJVIRUWKHIURQWGRRUDQGEDFNSDWLRGRRUWRHDFKXQLW
ZLWKRXWWDFNHGRQFDQRSLHV
7KHFHQWHUSRUWLRQRIWKHEXLOGLQJKDVEHHQFUHDWHGWRYLVXDOO\
VHSDUDWHWKHOLYLQJXQLWVDQGGLUHFWUDLQZDWHUWRZDUGVWKHUHTXLUHGUDLQ
JDUGHQ7KHQRUWKDQGVRXWKURRIVORSHVDUHVLPSO\SXOOHGDSDUWE\WKH
PLGGOHURRIWRYLVXDOO\VSHDNWRWKHFRPPRQUHVLGHQWLDOURRIOLQHV
DORQJWKHSURSHUW\OLQHVDGMDFHQWWRWKHQHLJKERULQJUHVLGHQFHV
6LWH)HDWXUHV /DQGVFDSLQJ
7KHH[LVWLQJWUHHVRQWKHSURSRVHGORWDUHSODQQHGWRUHPDLQZKLOH
QHLJKERULQJWUHHVZLOOEHWULPPHGDVQHHGHGGXULQJ FRQVWUXFWLRQ
7KHFRXUW\DUGZLOOEHODQGVFDSHGDVDFRPPRQVSDFHIRUUHVLGHQFHWR
VKDUH7KHILQDOGHVLJQZLOOEHGHWHUPLQHGEDVHGRQWKHUHTXLUHGVWRUP
GUDLQDJHGHVLJQ
ITEM 2, EXHIBIT 3
Applicant Response to LPC Requests
Added 8/21/19
Packet Pg. 49-12
;2
GDD7@F':AFA9D3B:E
DA@FA8F:7 AGE7-;7IFAF:7*AGF:73EF
DA@FA8F:7 AGE7-;7IFAF:7%ADF:73EF
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 43
ADFA>>;@E$GE7G?A8;E5AH7DK ;EFAD;5EE7EEADRE3D6
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 41
B:AFAD7H;E76
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 39
FA
I:7@;FI3EA55GB;764KF:7@67DEA@E3@6 A88E
&@F:7AF:7D
:3@6 ;FE ;@F79D;FKE77?E367CG3F77@AG9: FABDAH;67EGBBADF8ADE;9@;8;53@57
3@67>;9;4;>;FK3E3BAF7@F;3> ADFA>>;@E>3@6?3D=
-
%3F;A@3>)79;EF7D >;9;4;>;FKEE7EE?7@F
"-@5;:-8&135?@1>18535.585@E25180-??1??91:@ %AF >;9;4>7
?@41>1"-@5;:-8&135?@1>05?@>5/@<;@1:@5-8 %A
5?/A?? +:;E BDAB7DFK 3BB73DE 6A7E @AF 3BB73D FA 47 3EEA5;3F76 I;F: 3@
367CG3F7 5A@57@FD3F;A@ A8 :;EFAD;53>>K 3@6 3D5:;F75FGD3>>K E;9@;8;53@F
BDAB7DF;7E F:3F 3D7 5A@F;9GAGE FA A@7 3@AF:7D 3@6 ?;9:F 3>>AI 8AD F:7
5D73F;A@A83%3F;A@3>)79;EF7D6;EFD;5F
2@41>15?"-@5;:-8&135?@1>05?@>5/@<;@1:@5-85?@45?.A5805:3/;:@>5.A@5:3 %
2@41.A5805:35?5:-:1D5?@5:3"-@5;:-8&135?@1>05?@>5/@5?5@/;:@>5.A@5:3%
-
)75AD6;@9 @8AD?3F;A@
$4;@;3>-<4:A9.1>?
"13-@5B1?25810-@ +3F3@=3 ;EFAD;53>EEA5;3F7E @5
'
&
AJ
ADFA>>;@E&
&1<;>@@5@81 @F7@E;H7 #7H7>A5G?7@F3F;A@A8F:7'DAB7DFK3F
*
AI7E*F
ADFA>>;@E&
-@1?
&5FA47D
&1/;>01>? )A@*>367='D7E;67@F
#>3-:5F-@5;: +3F3@=3 ;EFAD;53>EEA5;3F7E @5
00>1?? '
&
AJ
ADFA>>;@E&
$4;:1:A9.1>?
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 38
3@6AH7DF:7
8A>>AI;@9 675367E 3BB73DE FA :3H7 D7?3;@76 >3D97>K G@3>F7D76
@
F:7
4G;>6;@9 I3E D7?A67>76
D5:;H3> 7H;67@57 E:AIE F:3F F:7 IAD= 5A?B>7F76
57DF3;@>K ;@HA>H76 5A@EFDG5F;A@ A8 F:7 D73D 366;F;A@
EE7EEADRE D75AD6E 3>EA
EG997EF F:3F F:7 :AGE7RE 7JF7D;AD I3E EFG55A76 3F F:3F F;?7
+:7 E?3>> 8DA@F
BAD5: ?3K 63F7 8DA? I:7@ F:7 :AGE7 I3E 7D75F76 I;F: 8;D7 ;@EGD3@57 ?3BE
8DA?3E73D>K3E
E:AI;@9F:3F3BAD5:A8E;?;>3DE;L7I3E3>D736KBD7E7@F
3F F:3F >A53F;A@
+:;E :A?7 @7H7D :36 3 8G>> I;6F: 8DA@F BAD5: 3E :3E 477@
EB75G>3F76
@EB75F;A@A8F:7BAD5:RE3D5:;F75FGD3>67F3;>E5A@8;D?76 F:3F ;F ;E
57DF3;@>KAH7D8;8FKK73DEA>6
B:AFA9D3B:A8F:7BDAB7DFKE:AIEF:3FF:7
5GDD7@F BAD5: 5A?B>7F7 I;F: ;FE 8>3D76 3@6 7JF7@676 DAA8>;@7 3@6 IDAG9:F
;DA@IAD=I3E3>D736KBD7E7@F4KF:3FF;?7
7:;@6F:7:AGE7F:7D73DK3D6AD;9;@3>>K:7>63@3@;?3>43D@;@F:7BDAB7DFKRE
EAGF:73EF5AD@7D
+:;E?3K:3H7477@GE76FAE:7>F7D3:ADE73@64G99K
G;>F
;@
F:743D@I3E>3F7DD7?AH76;@
+:73GFA?A4;>793D397F:3FEF3@6E
3>A@9F:73>>7KFA63KI3E7D75F76;@
F:7E3?7K73DF:3FD7?A67>;@9A8F:7
:AGE7 I3E 5A?B>7F76
+:;E 4G;>6;@9 ;E @AF =@AI@ FA :3H7 7JB7D;7@576 @A@
:;EFAD;53>F7D3F;A@EAF:7DF:3@D7B>357?7@FA8A@7A8F:793D3976AADE
.:;>7D767H7>AB?7@F:3EF3=7@B>35735DAEEF:7EFD77FFAF:7I7EF3@635DAEE
F:73>>7KFAF:773EFF:7:AGE7;E;@;FEAD;9;@3>>A53F;A@3@65A@F;@G7EFAEF3@6
3?A@9 D7E;67@57E A8 E;?;>3D 397 FA F:7 @ADF: 3@6 EAGF:
A@E7CG7@F>K F:7
3EB75FA8E7FF;@9:3E477@B3DF;3>>K6;?;@;E:76
+:74G;>6;@9D7F3;@E3@G?47D
A8 :;EFAD;5 873FGD7E ;@5>G6;@9 ;FE 3EK??7FD;53> 835367 AGDECG3D7 EFK>7 3@6
?3EE;@9 D3;E76 E3@6EFA@7 8AG@63F;A@ 6AG4>7 :G@9 E3E: I;@6AIE I;F:
7JBAE76E3@6EFA@7E;>>E3@63D5:76>;@F7>E3>3D97A5G>GEI;@6AIA@F:7@ADF:
;FE:;BB76 DAA8I;F:3E?3>> 8DA@F6AD?7D3@6675AD3F;H7?A6;>>;A@E3>A@9 F:7
73H7E
+:7EFG55A76I3>>E3BB73DFA63F78DA?
3@63D73:;EFAD;53>F7D3F;A@
FAF:74G;>6;@9
+A63KF:7:AGE77J:;4;FE3D73EA@34>K9AA6679D77A8;@F79D;FK
;@F:73D73EA867E;9@3@6877>;@9
+:73EB75FEA8?3F7D;3>E3@6IAD=?3@E:;B
3D7EA?7I:3F6;?;@;E:766G7FAF:74D;5=IAD=47;@95AH7D76I;F:EFG55A
&H7D3>> F:;E BDAB7DFK D7F3;@E 3 679D77 A8 ;@F79D;FK F:3F 97@7D3>>K 3>>AIE ;F FA
5A@H7K;FEAD;9;@E;@F:773D>KFI7@F;7F:57@FGDK;FE:;EFAD;5GE73E3D7E;67@F;3>
6GB>7J 3@6 ;FE 3EEA5;3F;A@ I;F: ;FE 73D>K 3@6 BDA?;@7@F AI@7DE
+:7 A@>K
EG4EF3@F;3>3>F7D3F;A@FAF:7:AGE7I;F:;@F:7B3EF8;8FKK73DE;EF:7D73D7JF7D;AD
EF3;DI3K3@6DAA8FAB675=A@F:7D73D366;F;A@
+:7E73D7?;@;?3>>K7JBAE76FA
H;7I8DA?F:78DA@FA8F:7BDAB7DFK
753GE7F:74G;>6;@9READ;9;@3>4D;5=IAD=
:3E477@5AH7D76I;F:EFG55AF:7:AGE76A7E@AF3BB73DFAD7F3;@3>7H7>A8
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 37
6GD;@93B7D;A6A875A@A?;53@6@7;9:4AD:AA67JB3@E;A@;@
ADFA>>;@E
FI3EA@7A8?3@K:AGE7E4G;>F3DAG@6F:3FF;?7;@F:7
4>A5=
A8*AGF: AI7E;@ F:7 3DD;EA@RE66;F;A@ >A53F76 <GEF@ADF:A8F:7A>AD36A
9D;5G>FGD3>A>>79753?BGE
@F:;E53E7F:7:AGE7I3EAD;9;@3>>K5A@EFDG5F76
3E 3 6GB>7J 3>>AI;@9 F:7 AI@7DE FA 97@7D3F7 ;@5A?7 8DA? F7@3@FE
7FI77@
3@6
F:7BDAB7DFKI3EAI@763@6A55GB;764KF:7@67DEA@3@6 A88
83?;>;7E I:A I7D7 D7>3F76 4K ?3DD;397
3D> @67DEA@ I:A :36 F:7 :AGE7
4G;>F I3E F:7 AI@7D 3@6 ?3@397D A8 F:7 " ! # @7IEB3B7D
FA97F:7DI;F::;EE;EF7D$3G67
+:7K>;H76;@F:;E:AGE78DA?
FA
+:7
D7@F3>G@;FI3EA55GB;764K3E7D;7EA85A>>797EFG67@FE
@
$3G67?3DD;76)3>B: A883@6F:75AGB>7A55GB;76F:7:A?7G@F;>F:7K
?AH76AGF;@
)3>B:;??76;3F7>K<A;@76F:783?;>K4GE;@7EE3@64753?7
3@;?BADF3@F?3@397DA8F:7 " ! #
@
F:7KI7D7<A;@76;@
F:7:A?74K3EA@@3?76)3>B: 3DB7DI:A9D7IGBF:7D73@6>3F7D67H7>AB76
3:;9:>KEG557EE8G>53D77D3E3 A>>KIAA63DF6;D75FAD3@6E7F67E;9@7D
GD;@9
F:75AGDE7A8:;E53D77D:7I3E;@HA>H76;@3@G?47DA88;>?EF:3F3D73?A@9
F:7;@6GEFDKRE?AEF83?AGE5>3EE;5E
3DB7DF:7@4753?7A@7A8.3>F;E@7KRE
AD;9;@3>O;?39;@77DEPD7EBA@E;4>78ADF:75A@57BFG3>67E;9@3@667H7>AB?7@F
A8;E@7K>3@6RE$3;@*FD77F,*3FFD35F;A@
7FGD@76FA:;E5:;>6:AA6;@ ADF
A>>;@E3E3BD;?3DKEAGD57A8;@EB;D3F;A@8ADF:7873FGD7RE67E;9@
+:;E BDAB7DFK 6A7E @AF 3BB73D FA 47 7>;9;4>7 8AD F:7 %) ' G@67D D;F7D;A@
4753GE7;FI3E@AF8AG@6FA:3H7477@367CG3F7>K3EEA5;3F76I;F:3@;?BADF3@F
:;EFAD;5 7H7@F AD B3FF7D@ A8 7H7@FE
7EB;F7 F:7 ;?BADF3@57 A8 E7H7D3> 73D>K
AI@7DE3@6A55GB3@FEA8F:7:A?7FAF:7>A53>5A??G@;FK3@6;FE:;EFADKF:7
:AGE7I3E@AFI:7D7 3DB7D A887@93976;@F:753D77DF:3F4DAG9:F:;?83?7
*;?;>3D>KI:;>7F:7@67DEA@E3@6 A88EI7D7;?BADF3@F;@F:7>A53>BG4>;E:;@9
4GE;@7EE6GD;@9F:78;DEFFIA675367EA8F:7FI7@F;7F:57@FGDKF:;E;E@AFI:7D7
F:7;D IAD= I3E 5A@6G5F76
A@E7CG7@F>K F:7 BDAB7DFK 6A7E @AF ?77F F:7
EF3@63D68AD%) '7>;9;4;>;FKG@67DD;F7D;A@
@D7>3F;A@FAD;F7D;A@F:7:AGE7D7F3;@E?3@K7>7?7@FEA8;FE73D>KFI7@F;7F:
57@FGDKEFK>73@667F3;>;@9
07FF:73D5:;H3>D75AD6;@6;53F7EF:3F;FI3E>;=7>K
EFG55A76K73DE>3F7D;@F:7>3F7
E
>F:AG9:F:;E;E3:;EFAD;53>F7D3F;A@F:7
4G;>6;@9READ;9;@3>4D;5=IAD=;EA4E5GD763@6F:7D73D757DF3;@>K47FF7D
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 36
E3E3@ ;>>GEFD3FAD
IAD=;@9 8AD ! # )! 3@6
"
7 F:7@ 4753?7 3
EG557EE8G> A>>KIAA6 3DF 6;D75FAD 3@6 E7F 67E;9@7DI;F:.3D@7D DAF:7DE 3@6
;E@7K*FG6;AE8DA?F:7
EFAF:7
E
+:DAG9:AGFF:;EB7D;A6:7IAD=76
A@ 3 @G?47D A8 :;9:>K EG557EE8G> 8;>?E 3?A@9 F:7? 3E34>3@53 *7D973@F
0AD=+:7:3D97A8F:7#;9:FD;9367
#739G7E,@67DF:7*73 3@F3EF;5
-AK397 3@6.;>>;7.A@=3 3@6 F:7 :A5A>3F7 35FADK
7 3>EAIAD=76 A@ F:7
D39@7FF7>7H;E;A@E7D;7E
GD;@9F:773D>K
E 3DB7DI3E7@939764K.3>F;E@7KFAE7DH73EA@7A8
F:7 8;D?RE 8;DEF O;?39;@77DE
P @ F:;E DA>7 :7 67E;9@76 F:7 $3;@ *FD77F ,*
3FFD35F;A@3F;E@7K>3@6I:;5::743E76;@B3DFGBA@:;E?7?AD;7EA89DAI;@9
GB ;@ ADF A>>;@E I:;>7 >;H;@9 ;@ F:7 :AGE7 A@ *AGF: AI7E *FD77F
3DB7D
EFG6;76F:7:;EFAD;55:3D35F7DA86AI@FAI@ ADFA>>;@E3@6GE76F:7>AA=3@6
877>A8EA?7A8;FE4G;>6;@9E3E;@EB;D3F;A@ 8AD F:767E;9@A8$3;@*FD77F,*
753GE7A8F:;E35:;7H7?7@F:7;E57>74D3F76;@F:75A??G@;FK3EA@7A8F:7
5;FKRE?AEF83?AGE@3F;H7EA@E
>F:AG9: 3DB7D>;H76;@ ADFA>>;@E6GD;@9:;E
5:;>6:AA6 I;F: :;E BDA87EE;A@3> 35:;7H7?7@FE 5A?;@9 >3F7D ;F I3E :;E
7JB7D;7@57F:7D7F:3FBDAH;676?7?AD;7EF:3F4753?7B3DFA8A@7A8F:7@3F;A@RE
?AEF;?BADF3@F3@647>AH767@F7DF3;@?7@FH7@G7E
8F:7BDAB7DFK3F
*AGF: AI7E*FD77F;EEA?763K5>73D>K8AG@6FA:3H7477@
67E;9@764K>A53>3D5:;F75F$A@F7LG?3 G>>7D;FI;>>@776FA47D77H3>G3F76FA
67F7D?;@7 I:7F:7D ;F ;E >A53>>K 7>;9;4>7 G@67D D;F7D;A@ ;@ D7>3F;A@ FA ;FE
3D5:;F75FGD7
>F:AG9: 7>7?7@FE A8 ;FE AD;9;@3> 67E;9@ IAD=?3@E:;B 3@6
?3F7D;3>E D7?3;@ 3BB3D7@F FA63K F:;E ?3K 47 BDA4>7?3F;5 4753GE7 F:7
4G;>6;@9RE 7JF7D;AD I3E 83576 I;F: EFG55A ;@ F:7 >3F7
E A4E5GD;@9 F:7
AD;9;@3>4D;5=IAD=
+:7BDAB7DFK;E@AF7>;9;4>7G@67DD;F7D;3AD
<<85/-.81"-@5;:-8&135?@1>>5@1>5-
??;/5-@10 C5@4 1B1:@? @4-@ 4-B1 9-01 - ?53:525/-:@ /;:@>5.A@5;: @; @41
.>;-0<-@@1>:;2;A>45?@;>E
??;/5-@10C5@4@4185B1?;2<1>?;:??53:525/-:@5:;A><-?@
9.;051? @41 05?@5:/@5B1 /4->-/@1>5?@5/? ;2 - @E<1 <1>5;0 ;> 91@4;0 ;2
/;:?@>A/@5;:;>>1<>1?1:@?@41C;>7;2-9-?@1>;><;??1??1?4534->@5?@5/
B-8A1? ;> >1<>1?1:@? - ?53:525/-:@ -:0 05?@5:3A5?4-.81 1:@5@E C4;?1
/;9<;:1:@?9-E8-/75:05B50A-805?@5:/@5;:
-?E518010;>9-E.1 85718E @;E51805:2;>9-@5;: 59<;>@-:@ 5:45?@;>E;>
<>145?@;>E
%A-85251?A:01>>5@1>5-;:?501>-@5;:?@4>;A34
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 35
.3F7DFAI@*
ADFA>>;@E&
,*7@EGE)75AD6E$37 7?>;@9&:>7K3@6:3D>7E&:>7K*F7D>;@9&
'D3FFAG@FK"*
ADFA>>;@E&
,*7@EGE)75AD6E)3>B:
3@6$3G67 A883@6 3DB7D A88A>AD36A;FK
&
ADF A>>;@E &
*3@F3 @3
#AE @97>7E
.3FDAGE @E7>
!" ' # "'
ADF A>>;@E & +:7
AGD;7D'D;@F;@9'G4>;E:;@9A?B3@K
-
*;9@;8;53@57
;/-88-:09->701?53:-@5;:
<<85/-.81;>@;885:?>5@1>5-;>@;885:?!A:5/5<-8;014-<@1>
'1/@5;:
B1:@? ??;/5-@10 C5@4 1B1:@? @4-@ 4-B1 9-01 - >1/;3:5F-.81
/;:@>5.A@5;:@;@41.>;-0<-@@1>:?;2@4145?@;>E;2@41/;99A:5@E'@-@1;>
"-@5;:-?<1/525/1B1:@;><-@@1>:;21B1:@?
/ $1>?;:? >;A<???;/5-@10C5@4@4185B1?;2<1>?;:?;>3>;A<?;2<1>?;:?
>1/;3:5F-.81 5: @41 45?@;>E ;2 @41 /;99A:5@E '@-@1 ;> "-@5;: C4;?1
?<1/525//;:@>5.A@5;:?@;@4-@45?@;>E/-:.1501:@52510-:00;/A91:@10
1?53:;:?@>A/@5;: 9.;051? @41 501:@525-.81 /4->-/@1>5?@5/? ;2 - @E<1
<1>5;0;>91@4;0;2/;:?@>A/@5;:>1<>1?1:@? @41C;>7;2-/>-2@?9-:;>
->/45@1/@ C4;?1 C;>7 5? 05?@5:3A5?4-.81 2>;9 ;@41>? .E 5@? /4->-/@1>5?@5/
?@E81-:0=A-85@E<;??1??1?4534->@5?@5/B-8A1?;>01?53:/;:/1<@?;><->@
;2->1/;3:5F-.81-:005?@5:3A5?4103>;A<;2<>;<1>@51?
:2;>9-@5;: <;@1:@5-8 -? E518010 ;> 9-E .1 85718E @; E5180 5:2;>9-@5;:
59<;>@-:@5:<>145?@;>E;>45?@;>E
;1?:;@911@-:E;2@41-.;B1;>@;885:?01?53:-@5;:/>5@1>5-
@3>KE;EA8 ADFA>>;@E*;9@;8;53@57 @ ADFA>>;@E3BDAB7DFK?3K477>;9;4>7
8AD>A53>67E;9@3F;A@7H7@I:7@;F;E8AG@6FA47;@7>;9;4>78ADF:7?AD7EFD;@97@F
*F3F73@6%3F;A@3>)79;EF7DEA8 ;EFAD;5'>357E
@F:;E53E7F:7BDAB7DFK3F
*AGF: AI7E*FD77F;E7>;9;4>78AD67E;9@3F;A@3E3;FKA8 ADFA>>;@E>3@6?3D=
G@67DD;F7D;A@8AD;FE3EEA5;3F;A@I;F:F:7>;H7EA8E7H7D3>B7DEA@EI:A3D7
;?BADF3@F FA F:7 :;EFADK A8 F:7 5A??G@;FK
+:7E7 ;@5>G67 E;4>;@9E 3D> 3@6
$3G67@67DEA@3>A@9I;F:)3>B: A883>>F:D77A8I:A?I7D7;@EFDG?7@F3>;@
F:78;7>6A8BG4>;E:;@93EF:7AI@7DE3@6?3@397DEA8F:7 " ! #
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 34
;2
.3DD3@FK 776 A>AD36A @H7EF?7@F 3@6 )73>FK A?B3@K FA $3K 1E;52
&:>7K
%AH7?47D
AA='397
.3DD3@FK 776 $37 &:>7K FA !A:@ '
3@6 7>7@
$5 H7D
BD;>
AA='397
.3DD3@FK 776 !A:@ '
3@6 7>7@
$5 H7D FA )A47DF '
3@6 $3DK &
A?EFA5=&5FA47D
AA='397
.3DD3@FK776)A47DF'
3@6$3DK&
A?EFA5=FA!A:@&
3@6 3DD;7FF*
+A>;H7D$3D5:
AA=
'397
.3DD3@FK 776 !A:@ &
3@6 3DD;7FF *
+A>;H7D FA #7EF7D $
"3B>3@
!3@G3DK
AA=
'397
$3DD;397)75AD6$34>7'73DEA@3@6!
*@K67D.3F7DFAI@*
757?47D
$3DD;397)75AD6$37 7?>;@93@6:3D>7E&:>7K D77>7K&
G9GEF
$3DD;397 )75AD6 )3>B: >97@7 A88 3@6 >;L347F: $3G67 @67DEA@ ADF
A>>;@E&
!G>K
$3DD;397)75AD6)3>B: 3DB7D A883@6 >AD7@57.
%7I5A?#AE@97>7E
G9GEF
$5.;>>;3?E"3D7@
;FKA8 ADFA>>;@E
D5:;F75FGD3>*GDH7K
*;F7 AD?
8AD
*
AI7E*F
%7I0AD=7@EGE)75AD6E#;EF;@9E 8AD GK3@67EE;7 D3:3? EABGE%0
%ADF: A>>KIAA6 3>;8AD@;3 ;FK ;D75FADK #;EF;@9E 8AD 3DB7D 3@6 >AD7@57
A88
O&>6+AI@3@6;E@7K>3@6RE$3;@*FD77F,*P ADFA>>;@E ;EFADKA@@75F;A@
#A53F76&@>;@73FIII
85?A6
AD9
'>3F A8 3DD;EA@RE66;F;A@ FA F:7;FK A8 ADFA>>;@E $3D5:
#3D;?7D
AG@FK>7D=3@6)75AD67DAA=)
'397
*3@F3@33@6*AGF:&D3@97AG@FK3>;8AD@;3;FK;D75FAD;7E#;EF;@9E8ADF:7
A88 3?;>K
,*7@EGE)75AD6E3D>
@67DEA@4DAF:7D3@6$3G67
@67DEA@E;EF7D
ADFA>>;@E&
,*7@EGE)75AD6E GK3@67EE;7 D3:3? EABGE%0
ADFA>>;@E
&
,*7@EGE)75AD6E!A:@3@6 7>7@$5 H7D ADFA>>;@E&
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 33
!G@7
B
D3@53H;9>;3);5:3D6-
" " $!"
AI3;FK ,@;H7DE;FKA8 AI3
'D7EE
>G5= "7;F: O 3DB7D A88 +:7 Q*75A@6R ?39;@77DP +:7 .3>F ;E@7K 3?;>K
$GE7G?$3K
#A53F76&@>;@73FIII
I3>F6;E@7K
AD9
3DB7D A88 $4#;EF;@9#A53F76&@>;@73FIII
;?64
5A?
O 3DB7D A88P&4;FG3DK "' ( BD;>
;EFAD;5 G;>6;@9 @H7@FADK )75AD6
*
AI7E *F
ADF A>>;@E & *;F7
#)
'D7B3D76 4K +A? 3@6 #3GD;7 *;??A@E DA@F)3@97)7E73D5:
EEA5;3F7E!3@G3DK
AH;@7!G>;7-
O+3>7A8+IA$3;@*FD77FEP
%
!
&5FA47D
B
#3D;?7DAG@FKEE7EEAD)73> EF3F7BBD3;E3>3D6E3@6':AFA9D3B:E'3D57>
AG@FK EE7EEADRE &88;57 3@6 ADF A>>;@E $GE7G? A8
;E5AH7DKD5:;H7E
#3D;?7DAG@FK>7D=)75AD67DRE&88;57+;F>7)75AD6E*T#AF>A5=
.3DD3@FK776>A5=
>;57$
3@6
'3FF7DEA@FA!3?7E 3DD;EA@
&5FA47D
AA="'397
.3DD3@FK776#AF!3?7E 3DD;EA@FA!A:@
$5AK*7BF7?47D
AA='397
.3DD3@FK776*T#AF!A:@
$5AKFA$DE
GK D3:3?
%AH7?47D
AA='397
.3DD3@FK776*T #AF $DE
GK D3:3? FA$
.
G>>7D
757?47D
AA='397
.3DD3@FK776*T#AFB>GEAF:7DBDAB7DF;7E$
.
G>>7D FA@@3 >;L3
G>>7D
74DG3DK
AA='397
.3DD3@FK 776 *T #AF @@3 >;L3 G>>7D FA 3D> @67DEA@ G9GEF
AA=
'397
.3DD3@FK 776 A@7 :3>8 ;@F7D7EF ;@ *T #AF 3D> @67DEA@ FA $3G67
@67DEA@
!G>K
AA='397
.3DD3@FK 776 A@7 :3>8 ;@F7D7EF ;@ *T #AF 3D> @67DEA@ FA $3G67
@67DEA@ A88
*7BF7?47D
AA='397
+DGEF 776 $3G67
3@6 )3>B:
A88 FA F:7 A>AD36A @H7EF?7@F 3@6
)73>FKA?B3@K&5FA47D
AA=
'397
7DF;8;53F7 A8 'GD5:3E7 'G4>;5 +DGEF77 A8 #3D;?7D AG@FK FA F:7 A>AD36A
@H7EF?7@F3@6)73>FKA?B3@K&5FA47D
AA='397
9D77?7@F 8AD*3>7'GD5:3E7A>AD36A @H7EF?7@F3@6)73>FKA?B3@K
FA$37 >7?;@9G9GEF
AA=
'397
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 32
" ! #
O#A53>3@6'7DEA@3>%7IEPBD;>
B
O 3BB7@;@9E;@*A5;7FK>G4E3@6:GD5:7EP
!3@G3DK
B
O$7EEDE
??7DEA@3@6 A88)7F;D7P$3K
B
O AD)7@FPG9GEF
B
O)AA?E8AD)7@FP
*7BF7?47D
B
O*FA>7@P
%AH7?47D
B
O ADFK +IA :;5=7@E D7 ";>>76 ;@ ;D7 A@ *AGF: AG7E 1E;52 *F
P
757?47D
B
O*A5;7FKP%AH7?47D
B
O'7DEA@3>EP!3@G3DK
B
O'7DEA@3>EPG9GEF
B
" !& !!
O*:ADF*FADKA8F:73;>KAGD;7D4K3D>@67DEA@P
$3K
JBD7EE
*75F;A@B
ADFA>>;@E+ABA9D3B:;5(G36D3@9>7$3BE,* 7A>A9;53>*GDH7K
" !' #
O;FK3@6AG@FDKPBD;>
B
O;FK3@6AG@FDKPG9GEF
B
O;FK3@6AG@FDKP
*7BF7?47D
B
O.3@F76P$3K
B
O#AEFP!G@7
B
O#AEFP%AH7?47D
B
O>A5=-A;>7*=;DF#AEFP
*7BF7?47D
B
#A53>%AF7757?47D
B
O#A53>3@6'7DEA@3>P!G@7
B
O$3G67@67DEA@75A?7ED;67A8)3>B:
A88P!G>K
B
O#A53>3@6'7DEA@3>P!G>K
B
O AA6)AA?E8AD*FG67@FEP
*7BF7?47D
B
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 31
E3@6D7?3;@76F:7D78AD?3@KK73DE
!A:@
I3E3E3>7E5>7D=3@6F:7@A88;57DA8F:7+A>;H7D ";@@7K$7D53@F;>7A?B3@K3
6AI@FAI@:3D6I3D7EFAD7
+:7K3BB73DFA:3H7D7@F76F:7E75A@6G@;F;@F:7
:AGE7 FAEFG67@FE
+:7+A>;H7DE:7>6A@FA F:7BDAB7DFKG@F;>
I:7@ F:7K
EA>6;FFA>A53>67H7>AB7D3@6BDAB7DFK;@H7EFAD#7EF7D"3B>3@
';A>/1?;25:2;>9-@5;:
D;7>073D4AA=*3@F3@3 ;9:*5:AA>*3@F3@33>;8AD@;3
;A9D3B:K A8 )3>B: #
'3DE:3>> G;67 FA F:7 )3>B: #
'3DE:3>> A>>75F;A@
A>AD36A*F3F7,@;H7DE;FK.3F7D)7EAGD57D5:;H7
GD;3> )75AD6E 7DF:3 $37 7?>;@9 &:>7K 3@6 :3D>7E .;>>;3? &:>7K
D3@6H;7I7?7F7DK ADFA>>;@E&
7DF:3RE3F7A873F:%AH7?47D
:3D>7ER3F7A873F:
$3K
#A53F763FIII
8;@639D3H7
5A?
GD;3>)75AD6E7EE;73@6 GK D3:3? D3@6H;7I7?7F7DK ADFA>>;@E&
7EE;7RE 3F7 A8 73F: $3K
GKRE 3F7 A8 73F: *7BF7?47D
#A53F763FIII
8;@639D3H7
5A?
GD;3>)75AD6E3D>
@67DEA@ D3@6H;7I7?7F7DK ADFA>>;@E&
3F7
A873F:%AH7?47D
#A53F763FIII
8;@639D3H7
5A?
GD;3>)75AD6E!A:@'3FD;5=$5 H7D3@6 7>7@
$5 H7D D3@6H;7I7?7F7DK
ADFA>>;@E&
!A:@RE3F7A873F:
*7BF7?47D
7>7@RE3F7A8
73F:
!G>K
#A53F763FIII
8;@639D3H7
5A?
GD;3> )75AD6E $34>7 )
'73DEA@ *@K67D D3@6H;7I 7?7F7DK ADF A>>;@E
&
3F7A873F:
!3@G3DK
#A53F763FIII
8;@639D3H7
5A?
GD;3> )75AD6E )3>B: >97@7 A88 3@6 >;L347F: $3G67 @67DEA@ A88
.;>>E7K 3;D:3H7@$7?AD;3>'3D=*3@F3@3
)3>B:RE3F7A873F:
!3@G3DK
$3G67RE 3F7 A8 73F: !G>K
#A53F76 3F
III
8;@639D3H7
5A?
GD;3>)75AD6E)3>B: 3DB7D A88 H7D9D77@7?7F7DKA>AD36A*BD;@9E&
3F7A873F:$3D5:
#A53F763FIII
8;@639D3H7
5A?
3>;8AD@;3-AF7D)79;EFD3F;A@E#;EF;@9E8AD)3>B: A88$3G67 A883@6 3DB7D
A88
;FKA8 ADFA>>;@EG;>6;@9'7D?;FE
*
AI7E*F
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 30
>A3@8DA?F:7A>AD36A
@H7EF?7@F 3@6 )73>FK A?B3@K GE;@9 F:7;D :AGE7 A@ AI7E *FD77F 3E
5A>>3F7D3>
DAG@6
;FE77?EF:3FF:7K7;F:7D6783G>F76A@F:7>A3@AD83;>76
FA B3K F:7;D BDAB7DFK F3J7E 4753GE7 F:7 :AGE7 7@676 GB I;F: F:7 #3D;?7D
AG@FKBG4>;5FDGEF773@6F:7 A88E?AH76;@FA3D7@F3>A@*AGF:$KDF>7*FD77F
478AD7F:7K>78F8AD3>;8AD@;3
@&5FA47D
F:75AG@FKEA>6F:7BDAB7DFK3F
BG4>;5 3G5F;A@ FA F:7 A>AD36A @H7EF?7@F 3@6 )73>FK A?B3@K I:;5: :36
EG4?;FF763:;9:4;6A8
GD;@9F:7
EF:7:AGE7I3EA55GB;764KFIABD;?3DKD7@F3>F7@3@FE
+:7
8;DEFA8F:7E7I3E$34>7'
*@K67DF:7I;6AIA8!
G9GEFGE*@K67D
*:7>;H76
;@F:7:A?7I;F::7DEA@$A@DA78DA?34AGF
FA
3@6D7@F768GD@;E:76
DAA?EFA4A3D67DE
$34>73>EA:AEF76?77F;@9EA83IA?7@RE9DAGB=@AI@3E
F:7GDD7@F H7@FE3@6+D3H7>>G4
@757?47D
F:7 " ! #
BD;@F76 3@ 3DF;5>7 34AGF 3 8;D7 ;@ :7D 5:;5=7@ :AGE7 F:3F =;>>76 8ADFK FIA 4;D6E
I;B;@9AGF3@;?BADF3@FEAGD57A8:7D;@5A?7
+:7@7JFA55GB3@FE8DA?34AGF
FA
I7D783D?7DE!AE7B:3@6$34>7G@9>7D3>A@9I;F:F:7;D5:;>6D7@
>8D76!AE7B:;@73@6'3G>
AF:>8D763@6!AE7B:;@7I7D7EFG67@FE3F@73D4K
A>AD36A9D;5G>FGD3>A>>797
@
F:7A>AD36A @H7EF?7@F3@6)73>FKA?B3@KEA>6F:7BDAB7DFK3F
*AGF: AI7E *FD77F 8AD
FA $37 7?>;@9
+:7 5A@FD35F ;@HA>H76 3
B3K?7@FB>3@8;@3@5764KF:7E7>>7D3@6 ;@
$37D757;H76F:76776FAF:7
BDAB7DFK
AD@ ;@ .;E5A@E;@ ;@
E:7 :36 IAD=76 3E 3 @GDE7 8AD ?3@K
K73DE 8;DEF ;@ *F7D>;@9 3@6 F:7@ 3F F:7 :AEB;F3> ;@ ADF A>>;@E
@
E:7
?3DD;76:3D>7E.;>>;3?&:>7K3@3F;H7A8'7@@EK>H3@;3I:AI3E4AD@F:7D7;@
3@6 F:7@ 83D?76 ;@ "3@E3E 8AD 3 @G?47D A8 K73DE
$37 3@6 :3D>7E
D7?3;@76;@F:7:AGE7A@ AI7E*FD77F;@FAF:7
E
:3D>7E6;76;@
3@6
I3E4GD;76;@ D3@6H;7I7?7F7DK
+:D77K73DE>3F7D$37EA>6F:7:AGE73@6
F:7@6;76;@
3@6I3E4GD;76@7JFFA:7D:GE43@6
+:7 @7I AI@7DE I:A BGD5:3E76 F:7 BDAB7DFK ;@
I7D7 !A:@ 3@6 7>7@
$5 H7D I:A :36 3DD;H76 ;@ ADF A>>;@E 34AGF 3 675367 73D>;7D
AD@ ;@
$;@@7EAF3 ;@
!A:@ I3E ?3@397D A8 F:7 'DG67@F;3> @EGD3@57 A?B3@K
A88;57;@ ADFA>>;@E
7>7@I3E3@3F;H7A8.;E5A@E;@4AD@F:7D7;@
+:7
5AGB>7>;H76;@F:7:AGE78AD34AGF8AGDK73DE
DAG@6
F:7KI7D7D7@F;@9
F:7E75A@63DKD7E;67@F;3>G@;FFA#AG3@6#7F3 D77@
7IAD=768ADF:7 AD@7K
$3@G835FGD;@9 A?B3@K
@
F:7 $5 H7DE EA>6 F:7 :A?7 FA )A47DF 3@6
$3DK A?EFA5=
)A47DF I3E 3 97A>A9;EF I:A IAD=76 8AD F:7 673> 7?7@F
A?B3@K
+:7KD7?3;@76F:7D78AD8AGDK73DE3@66GD;@9F:3FF;?7D7@F76F:7
E75A@6G@;FFA)A?7*@7>>367B3DF?7@F?3@397D3F$A@F9A?7DK.3D6E
@
F:7A?EFA5=EEA>6F:7:A?7FA!A:@3@6 3DD;7FF+A>;H7DI:AAI@76
F:7BDAB7DFK8ADF:7@7JFFI7@FK FIAK73DE
GD;@9F:7>3F7
EF:7:AGE7I3E
A55GB;76 4K FIA F7@3@FE
+:7 BD;?3DK D7E;67@57 :AGE76 )A47DF 3@6 #A;E
);5:3D6E
7I3E3EGB7DH;EAD3@6E7DH;578AD7?3@I;F:F:7$AG@F3;@*F3F7E
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 29
)3>B:D7F;D76
8DA?F:7BG4>;E:;@94GE;@7EE3EF:75A?B3@K53?7G@67D@7IAI@7DE:;B393;@
I;F:5A@EA>;63F;A@A8F:7 FAI@RE FIABD;?3DK@7IEB3B7DE F:7 # 3@6 F:7
& !!
+:7 A88E>78F ADFA>>;@E3@6?AH76FA*3@F3@33>;8AD@;3I:7D7
)3>B: 4753?7 3 ?7D5:3@F
7 6;76 ;@
3@6 I3E 4GD;76 ;@ F:3F 5;FKRE
3;D:3H7@ $7?AD;3> '3D=
$3G67 FAA= A@ E3>7E <A4E 3@6 F:7@ AB7@76 3
IA?7@RE5>AF:;@9EFAD7;@F:7?;6
E
*:76;76;@
3@6I3E4GD;76;@
F:7E3?757?7F7DK3E:7D:GE43@6
7FI77@
3@6
3DB7D 3FF7@676 F:7 :AG;@3D6 DF @EF;FGF7 ;@ #AE
@97>7E
@
:7?3DD;76 >AD7@57%7I5A?3@64793@FAE75GD7IAD=3E3@
;>>GEFD3FAD 8AD BDA?;@7@F BG4>;53F;A@E ;@5>G6;@9 ! # )!3@6
"
3DB7D I3E 7?B>AK76 8DA? 3DAG@6
FA
3E 3?AH;7 E7F
67E;9@7D3FF:7.3D@7DDAF:7DEEFG6;AIAD=;@9A@8;>?EEG5:3E3E34>3@53
*7D973@F0AD=3@6+:7:3D97A8F:7#;9:FD;9367
GD;@9.AD>6.3D :7
67H7>AB76B3;@FE5:7?7E8AD53?AG8>397GE764KF:7D?K3@6%3HK
@
3DB7D:36 3 5:3@57?77F;@9I;F:.3>F;E@7K ;@ 3#A@6A@?A67> FD3;@ EFAD7
3@6I3EA887D763<A4I;F:;E@7KREBDA6G5F;A@5A?B3@K
557BF;@9F:7A887D
:7I7@FFAIAD=8AD;E@7K*FG6;AE3E3@3DF6;D75FAD3@6BDA6G5F;A@67E;9@7D
&@7A8:;E?AEF@AF34>7BDA<75FEF:7D7I3EF:7
8;>?
#739G7E,@67D
F:7*738ADI:;5::767E;9@76F:7%3GF;>GEEG4?3D;@7
.:7@.3>F;E@7K>3G@5:76F:767H7>AB?7@FA8;E@7K>3@6;@F:773D>K
E
3DB7D A884753?7A@7A8F:7BDA<75FREBD;?3DK67E;9@7DEADO;?39;@77DE
P 7
;E5D76;F76I;F::3H;@967E;9@76$3;@*FD77F,*3>A@9I;F: F:7!G@9>7);H7D
DG;E7
&@7 A8 3DB7DRE ?3;@ EAGD57E A8 ;@EB;D3F;A@ 8AD F:7 >AA= 3@6 877> A8
$3;@*FD77F,*53?78DA?:;E?7?AD;7EA89DAI;@9GB;@ ADFA>>;@EI:7@:7
I3E >;H;@9 ;@ F:7 :AGE7 3F
*AGF: AI7E *FD77F
3DB7D D7?3;@76 35F;H7
BDA87EE;A@3>>K ;@FA F:7
E IAD=;@9 A@ F:7 D39@7F F7>7H;E;A@ E7D;7E 3@6
BDAH;6;@93DF6;D75F;A@8ADF:78;>?E 3@F3EF;5-AK3973@6.;>>;7.A@=33@6F:7
:A5A>3F7 35FADK
7 I3E 3>EA ;@HA>H76 ;@ F:7 67E;9@ A8 '&+RE .AD>6
*:AI53E7 ;@ &D>3@6A
3DB7D 6;76 ;@
;@ '3>? *BD;@9E 3@6 I3E 4GD;76
36<357@FFA:;E9D3@683F:7D;@A>AD36A*BD;@9ER H7D9D77@7?7F7DK
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 28
F:7 " ! # BD;@F763E?3>>;F7?A8>A53>;@F7D7EF
;@8AD?;@9;FED7367DEF:3FIAD=I3E34AGFFA5A??7@57A@F:75A@EFDG5F;A@A83
4D;5=D7E;67@57A@*AGF: AI7E*FD77F8AD3D>@67DEA@
FF:3FF;?7
:7I3E>;H;@9 ;@3D7@F3>:AGE7A@ 3EF$G>47DDK*FD77FI:;5::7E:3D76I;F:
:;E E;EF7DE $3G67 3@6 '73D>7
>;L347F: $3G67 I3E 7?B>AK76 3E 36H7DF;E;@9
?3@397DA8F:7AGD;7D'D;@F;@9'G4>;E:;@9A?B3@K3@6>3D3'73D>7I3E3
EFG67@F;@:7D73D>KF77@E
+:7@7I:AGE7DAE7AH7DF:78A>>AI;@9?A@F:E3@6
I3E5A?B>7F76;@F;?78ADF:7@67DEA@E;4>;@9EFA?AH7;@6GD;@9F:7E75A@6
I77= A8 G9GEF
@ 3 E75A@6 E?3>> 3DF;5>7 BG4>;E:76 A@ G9GEF
F:7
@7IEB3B7D67E5D;476F:7O7;9:FDAA?4D;5=P:AGE73E3O:3@6EA?7P4G;>6;@9
%A ;@8AD?3F;A@ I3E BDAH;676 4K F:7 @7IEB3B7D D793D6;@9 I:A ?;9:F :3H7
67E;9@76 3@6 4G;>F F:7 :AGE7
.:;>7 ;F ?3K :3H7 477@ F:7 IAD= A8 3D5:;F75F
$A@F7LG?3 G>>7D 3 F:ADAG9: E73D5:A8:;EFAD;5 D75AD6E 8DA? F:7 F;?7B7D;A6
G@5AH7D76@A7H;67@57A8:;E;@HA>H7?7@F;@F:7BDA<75F
.:7@ F:7:AGE73F
*AGF: AI7E*FD77FI3E5A@EFDG5F76 ;FI3E67E;9@76
I;F: FIA 7@FD3@57E A@7 8AD F:7 AI@7DE 3@6 3@AF:7D BDAH;6;@9 3557EE FA 3
E7B3D3F7D7E;67@F;3>G@;F8ADF7@3@FE
+:78;DEFF7@3@F;@F:7:A?7I3E$DE
$
*?;F:I:AD7E;676F:7D73DAG@6
EG4E7CG7@FF7@3@F3DAG@6
I3E
)3>B:'3DE:3>>I:A3FF:7F;?7I3E3EFG67@F3FA>AD36A9D;5G>FGD3>A>>797
'3DE:3>> D757;H76 :;E
*
;@ 5;H;> 3@6 ;DD;93F;A@ 7@9;@77D;@9 3@6I7@F A@ FA 3
@AF34>753D77D3E3BDA87EEAD3@66;D75FADA8F:7;H;E;A@A8 DD;93F;A@I;F:F:7
,* 7B3DF?7@F A8 9D;5G>FGD7RE *A;> A@E7DH3F;A@ *7DH;57
7 ;@H7@F76 F:7
'3DE:3>> >G?7 3 67H;57 8AD ?73EGD;@9 DG@@;@9 I3F7D ;@ 6;F5:7E F:3F EBD736
35DAEE F:7 IAD>6
073DE >3F7D '3DE:3>> I3E ;@HA>H76 ;@ B>3@@;@9 8AD F:7
A>AD36A ;9 +:A?BEA@ BDA<75F
+:DAG9:AGF F:7
E 3@6
E F:7 D7@F3>
EB357;@F:7:AGE75A@F;@G76FA47A55GB;764K3E7D;7EA8EFG67@FE
+:7@67DEA@ E;4>;@9E >;H76 FA97F:7D ;@ F:7:AGE7 3F
*AGF: AI7E*FD77F
F:DAG9:AGF F:7 8;DEF 675367 A8 F:7 FI7@F;7F: 57@FGDK 3@6 3F EA?7 BA;@F ;F
3BB73DEF:3F$3G6735CG;D763A@7 :3>8;@F7D7EF;@F:7BDAB7DFK
AI7H7DF:;E
5:3@976 6GD;@9 F:7 EG??7D A8
@ >3F7 !G@7 A8 F:3F K73D 3D> ?3DD;76
7@AD3 H3@E3@6F:7K?AH76;@FA3:AGE7A8F:7;DAI@A@.7EF&3=*FD77F
87I 63KE >3F7D A@ F:7 8;DEF 63K A8 !G>K$3G67?3DD;76 3?3@ 4K F:7 @3?7 A8
)3>B:>97@7 A88
AD@;@
;@$;EEAGD;4KF:7>3F7
E)3>B::36?AH76
I7EFI;F::;E83?;>KFAA>AD36A;FKI7EFA8A>AD36A*BD;@9EI:7D7:;E83F:7D
IAD=763E3>G?47D673>7D
DAG@6
:7?AH76FA ADFA>>;@E3@6IAD=76
8ADF:7%7IFA@#G?47DA?B3@K478AD7F3=;@934AA==77B7DBAE;F;A@I;F:F:7
!
-
3D=7D$7D53@F;>7A?B3@K
73>EA:3638;@7 F7@ADHA;573@64753?7
=@AI@;@F:7>A53>?GE;55A??G@;FK
&@)3>B:3@6$3G67REI766;@963K3D>
FD3@E87DD76:;EA@7 :3>8AI@7DE:;B;@
*AGF: AI7E*FD77FFA:;EE;EF7DI:A
4753?7F:7BDAB7DFKREEA>7AI@7D
A>>AI;@9 F:7;D I766;@9 57D7?A@K I:;5: FAA= B>357 ;@ F:7 :AGE7 A@ *AGF:
AI7E )3>B: 3@6 $3G67 :A@7K?AA@76 ;@ A>AD36A *BD;@9E 3@6 $3@;FAG
*BD;@9E
35=;@ ADFA>>;@EF:7KE7FF>76;@FAF:7:AGE73@6)3>B:4753?7
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 27
3>A@9I;F:E7H7D3>A8F:7
EGDDAG@6;@9 4>A5=E I7D7 EA>6 8AD
4K >;57 3@6 DF:GD '3FF7DEA@ FA
!3?7E 3DD;EA@
@$3D5:
3DD;EA@8;>763B>3F8AD 3DD;EA@RE66;F;A@I;F:
F:7#3D;?7DAG@FK5>7D=REA88;57
+:7366;F;A@A55GB;76F:7E;JECG3D74>A5=E
4AD67D764K$G>47DDK*FD77FA@ F:7@ADF:#3GD7>*FD77FA@ F:7 EAGF:A>>797
H7@G7A@F:773EF3@6$7>6DG?*FD77FA@F:7I7EF
FI3E3>EA>A53F76<GEF
@ADF: A8 F:7 E?3>> 4GF 9DAI;@9 53?BGE A8A>AD36A9D;5G>FGD3>A>>797 @AI
=@AI@3EA>AD36A*F3F7,@;H7DE;FK
@*7BF7?47D
3DD;EA@EA>6#AF;@>A5=
8AD
FA!A:@
$5AK
34AGFI:A?@AF:;@9;E=@AI@
&@7K73D>3F7D;@%AH7?47D
:7EA>6F:7
EAGF: :3>8 A8 F:7 >AF FA 7EE;7 D3:3? 8AD
7EE;7 I3E F:7 I;87 A8 GK
D3:3? 4AF: A8 F:7? ;??;9D3@FE 8DA? D7>3@6
'D;AD FA F:7;D 3DD;H3> ;@ ADF
A>>;@EF:7K>;H768ADK73DE;@ EABGE%7I0AD=I:7D7 GKI3E34A3F53BF3;@
A@F:7 G6EA@);H7D
@ ADFA>>;@EF:7KD7E;676;@3:A?7A@'7F7DEA@*FD77F
3@6 GK;@;F;3>>KIAD=763E363K>34AD7D3@6>3F7D4753?73>3@6>AD6
7EE;7
:7>6A@FAF:7H353@F >AFA@ AI7E*FD77F8AD38G>>675367478AD7E7>>;@9;F ;@
>3F7
*:76;768;H7?A@F:E>3F7D;@$3K
3@6I3E4GD;76;@ D3@6H;7I
7?7F7DK
GK>;H76G@F;>
3@6I3E3>EA>3;6FAD7EFF:7D7
7EE;7 D3:3?EA>6 F:7 >AFA@ AI7E*FD77F3FF:77@6A8757?47D
8AD
FABDA?;@7@F ADFA>>;@E3D5:;F75F$A@F7LG?3 G>>7D34AGFI:A??G5:
:3E477@ID;FF7@
"7KFAF:7BDAB7DFKA@ AI7E*FD77F;EF:7835FF:3F G>>7DI3E
@AF A@>K 67E;9@;@9 4G;>6;@9E 6GD;@9 F:;E F;?7 B7D;A6 4GF I3E 3>EA ;@H7EF;@9
:73H;>K ;@ BDAB7DF;7E ;@5>G6;@9 H353@F >AFE
+:7 >AI BGD5:3E7 BD;57 8AD #AF
;@6;53F7E F:3F ;F I3E EF;>> H353@F 3F F:3F F;?7
!GEF AH7D A@7 ?A@F: >3F7D ;@
74DG3DK
:7 FD3@E87DD76 ;F FA :;E I;87 @@3 >;L3 G>>7D 3>A@9 I;F: 3
@G?47D A8 366;F;A@3> BDAB7DF;7E ;@ FAI@
@@3 :7>6 A@ FA F:7 >AF A@ AI7E
*FD77FF:DAG9:F:77@6A8F:7675367478AD7E7>>;@9;FFA3@7IAI@7D
+:7D7;E
@A 7H;67@57 F:3F F:7 G>>7DE 67H7>AB76 F:7 BDAB7DFK 6GD;@9 F:7;D B7D;A6 A8
AI@7DE:;BF:DAG9:AGFF:7
E
@G9GEF
@@3 G>>7DEA>6F:7EAGF::3>8A8#AFFA3D>@67DEA@8AD3
BGD5:3E7 BD;57 A8 393;@ BDAH;6;@9 7H;67@57 F:3F F:7 BDAB7DFK I3E EF;>>
H353@F
K F:3F F;?7 @67DEA@ I3E F:7 BD;@5;B3> EFA5=:A>67D BD7E;67@F 3@6
97@7D3> ?3@397D A8 F:7 AGD;7D 'D;@F;@9 'G4>;E:;@9 A?B3@K I:;5:
BDA6G576F:7 " ! # @7IEB3B7D3@6BDAH;676<A4BD;@F;@9E7DH;57E
FA F:75A??G@;FK
AD@ ;@
;@*F
:3D>7E AI3 F:7EA@A83@7IEB3B7D
AI@7D:7>73D@76F:7BD;@F7DREFD3673@64753?73FD3H7>ID;F7D8AD3D3;>DA36
8F7D 3FF7@6;@9 F:7 ,@;H7DE;FK A8 $;EE;EE;BB; :7 ?AH76 I7EF FA A>AD36A
;@F7@6;@9 FABGD5:3E7 F:7 $ "
AI7H7DF:3F673> 87>> F:DAG9:
3@6;@EF736:735CG;D763?3<AD;FKA8EFA5=;@F:7AGD;7D'D;@F;@9'G4>;E:;@9
A?B3@KA8 ADFA>>;@EI:;5::7FAA=5A@FDA>A8;@73D>K
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 26
B
O;FK 3@6 AG@FDKP " ! '
# G9GEF
B
;:?@>A/@5;: 5?@;>E
AGE7
N.:;>7F:75AG@FK3EE7EEADRED75AD6EEF3F7F:3FF:;E:AGE7I3E
5A@EFDG5F76 ;@
FIA4D;78 3DF;5>7E 34AGF ;FE67H7>AB?7@F F:3F 3BB73D76 ;@
F:7 ADFA>>;@E@7IEB3B7DBDAH;677H;67@57F:3F;FI3E35FG3>>K4G;>F6GD;@9F:7
EBD;@93@6EG??7DA8
.:7@;FI3E7D75F76F:7:AGE7;@5>G6763E?3>>
AB7@BAD5:ADEFAAB3F;FE@ADF:I7EF5AD@7D3@638G>> I;6F:AB7@BAD5:FAF:7
D73D
;EFAD;5 3EE7EEADRE D75AD6E ;@6;53F7 F:3F F:7 :AGE7 I3E D7?A67>76 ;@
+:;E ;@HA>H76 5A@EFDG5F;A@ A8 F:7 D73D 366;F;A@ 3@6 >;=7>K ;@5>G676 F:7
3BB>;53F;A@A8EFG55AFAF:77@F;D77JF7D;ADA8F:74G;>6;@9
B:AFA9D3B:
E:AIEF:3FF:7EFG55AI3EBD7E7@F4KF:3FF;?7
+:7E?3>>8DA@FBAD5:ADEFAAB
I;F: ;FE 8>3D76 DAA8 7JF7@E;A@ 3@6 IDAG9:F ;DA@ D3;>;@9 3@6 BAEFE I3E 3>EA
BD7E7@F4K
;@;FE5GDD7@F8AD?
;D7;@EGD3@57?3BE;@6;53F7F:3F3E?3>>
AB7@ BAD5: A8 F:7 E3?7 E;L7 :3E 477@ 3F F:;E >A53F;A@ E;@57 F:7 :AGE7 I3E
5A@EFDG5F76
3D397
N @
3@ 3@;?3> E:76 BDA434>K 3 E?3>> :ADE7 43D@ I3E
36676 FA F:7 D73D EAGF:73EF 5AD@7D A8 F:7 BDAB7DFK 3>A@9 F:7 3>>7K
+:;E I3E
D7BADF76>K67E;9@764K ADFA>>;@E3D5:;F75F$A@F7LG?3 G>>7D
DAG@6
F:74G;>6;@9?3K:3H7477@GE763E35:;5=7@:AGE7
FI3E67?A>;E:76;@
3@6D7B>3576I;F:3@7I5:;5=7@:AGE7
:;EFAD;54G;>6;@9B7D?;FE:AIEF:3F
F:793D397EF3@6;@9F:7D7FA63KI3E5A@EFDG5F76;@
#>535:-8 ;/-@5;: 07E
-
;EFAD;53>EEA5;3F;A@E
#>535:-8)?1? A?7EF;5 $G>F;B>7I7>>;@9
:@1>9105-@1)?1? %AFBB>;534>7
A>>1:@)?1? A?7EF;5 $G>F;B>7I7>>;@9
'5@1(E<1? )7E;67@F;3>GB>7J
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 25
F:7E7 3D7 4A3D676 5>AE76 3@6 F:7 F:;D6 5A@F3;@E F:7 AD;9;@3> 8AGD >;9:F 8D3?7
I;F:4DA=7@B3@7EA89>3EE3@64A3D6E35DAEEF:7;@F7D;AD
+:7@ADF:I3>>:A>6E
3E;@9>7E?3>>4A3D676I;@6AI
-
D5:;F75FGD3> ;EFADK
-@1;2;:?@>A/@5;: ?@59-@1 /@A-8
';A>/1;2 :2;>9-@5;: O;FK3@6AG@FDKP " !' # BD;>
B
O;FK 3@6 AG@FDKP " ! '
# G9GEF
B
>/45@1/@ ,@=@AI@
';A>/1;2 :2;>9-@5;: %AFBB>;534>7
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 24
;2
.7EF.3>>8DA@F+:783M367873FGD7E3@G?47DA8F:7:A?7READ;9;@3>873FGD7E
+IA 7@FD;7E 3D7 >A53F76 @73D F:7 @ADF:I7EF 5AD@7D A8 F:7 4G;>6;@9 735:
BD7EG?34>K BDAH;6;@9 3557EE FA 3 E7B3D3F7 ;@F7D;AD D7E;67@57
+:7E7 3D7
3557EE76 4K I3K A8 3 E?3>> AB7@ BAD5: F:3F ?3K 3>EA 47 67E5D;476 3E 3
5A@5D7F7EFAABI;F:FIA>3@6;@9EA@73F735:A8F:77@FD3@57E
+:7@ADF:7D@
3@6I7EF7D@ AGF7D 7697E A8 F:7 EFAAB 3D7 >;@76I;F: AD@3?7@F3>IDAG9:F ;DA@
D3;>E
+IA 675AD3F;H7 IDAG9:F ;DA@ BAEFE EGBBADF F:7 DAA8 34AH7
@ 73D>K
47364A3D657;>;@93>EAD7?3;@E ;@B>357
+:7DAA834AH7F:7EFAAB;E934>76
I;F:38>3D767JF7@E;A@FAF:7EAGF:
F;E8;@;E:76I;F:5A?BAE;F;A@E:;@9>7E
35:A8F:78DA@F7@FD3@57E:A>6E3IAA6B3@7>6AADI;F:3E;@9>7>;9:F;@F:7
GBB7D :3>8
+A F:7 EAGF: A8 F:7 7@FD;7E F:7 8;DEF 8>AAD I3>> :3E 3@ AH7DE;L76
6AG4>7 :G@9 I;@6AI I;F: I:3F 3BB73DE FA 47 3@ AB7D34>7 >AI7D >;9:F 3@6 3
8;J76GBB7DA@7
+:;E;@5>G67E3E3@6EFA@7E;>>3D5:76>;@F7>3@6IAA68D3?7E
3@6 EGDDAG@6E
&@ F:7 E75A@6 8>AAD 3D7 FIA A@7 AH7D A@7 6AG4>7 :G@9 E3E:
I;@6AIEI;F:F:7EAGF:A@7>3D97DF:3@F:7AF:7D
AF::3H7E3@6EFA@7E;>>E
3>A@9I;F:IAA68D3?7E3@6EGDDAG@6E
%ADF:.3>>E;67+:7@ADF:I3>>:A>6E@A7@FD;7E;@FAF:7:AGE7
&@F:7?3;@
8>AAD 3D7 F:D77 I;@6AIE
&@7 A8 F:7E7 ;E 3 A@7 AH7D A@7 6AG4>7 :G@9 E3E:
I;@6AII;F:3E3@6EFA@7E;>>3@63D5:76>;@F7>
+:7E75A@6;E3E;?;>3DI;@6AI
EB357F:3F:3E477@8;>>76I;F:FI7@FK 8AGD9>3EE4>A5=E
+AI3D6F:74G;>6;@9RE
@ADF:I7EF 5AD@7D ;E 3 >3D97 A5G>GE I;@6AI I;F: B3;@F76 3@6 EFG55A76 IAA6
FD;? AB3CG7 9>3EE 3@6 E?3>> E3@6EFA@7 4>A5=E 3F F:7 FAB 3@6 4AFFA?
+:7
E75A@6 8>AAD :A>6E FIA A@7 AH7D A@7 6AG4>7 :G@9 E3E: I;@6AIE 4AF: I;F:
E3@6EFA@7E;>>E
>>A8F:7I;@6AIE:3H7IAA68D3?7E3@6EGDDAG@6E
3EF.3>>D73D+:773EFI3>>;E6A?;@3F764KF:7D73DA@7 EFADK366;F;A@I;F:
F:7 AD;9;@3> E75A@6 EFADK I3>> 7JBAE76 34AH7
+:7 7@FDK ;@FA F:7 366;F;A@ ;E
8AG@6 3F F:7 4G;>6;@9RE EAGF:73EF 5AD@7D
+:;E :A>6E 3 ?A67D@ IAA6 B3@7>
6AAD
&GFE;67A8F:;E ;E3E?3>>5A@5D7F7EFAABI;F:?7F3>B;B7:3@6D3;>E3@6
?7F3>B;B7BAEFEF:3FEGBBADF3?7F3>:AA6
%ADF:A8F:77@FDK3D7FIAB3;DEA8
A@7 AH7D A@7 6AG4>7 :G@9 E3E: I;@6AIE I;F: IAA6 8D3?7E 3@6 EGDDAG@6E
3>A@9I;F:E5D77@E
+:7E75A@6 8>AAD ;E D735:764KI3KA83?A67D@7JF7D;ADIAA6EF3;D53E7 F:3F
D;E7E3FF:74G;>6;@9RE@ADF:73EF5AD@7D
+:;ED735:7E3E?3>>675=A@F:7DAA8
A8F:78;DEF 8>AAD366;F;A@
+:77@FD3@57FAF:7:AGE73FF:7675=:A>6E3EFAD?
6AAD3>A@9I;F:3@AF:7D6AADF:3F5AG>6@AF47E77@
>A@9F:7I3>>EAGF:A8
F:7 7@FD3@57 ;E 3 E;@9>7 A@7 AH7D A@7 6AG4>7 :G@9 E3E: I;@6AI I;F: 3
E3@6EFA@7E;>>3@6IAA68D3?73@6EGDDAG@6E
*AGF: .3>> E;67 +:7 EAGF: I3>> :A>6E @A 7@FD;7E ;@FA F:7 :AGE7
&@ F:7
43E7?7@F >7H7> 3D7 F:D77 E?3>> :AD;LA@F3> I;@6AIE E7F ;@FA E:3>>AI 5A@5D7F7
I7>>E
+:7?3;@8>AADA@F:7AD;9;@3>B3DFA8F:7:AGE7:3EF:D77A@7 AH7D A@7
6AG4>7 :G@9 E3E: I;@6AIE I;F: E3@6EFA@7 E;>>E 3D5:76 >;@F7>E 3@6 IAA6
8D3?7E3@6EGDDAG@6E
+:7D73D366;F;A@FAF:773EF:A>6EFIAE?3>>A@7 AH7D
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 23
)' '%A-0"-91 ADFA>>;@EA>AD36A
+1->
D7H;E76
!-<?/-81
;@? *TA8#AF 8;/7
005@5;: 3DD;EA@RE66;F;A@ +1->;2005@5;:
;A:0->E1?/>5<@5;:-:0 A?@525/-@5;:+:;E>793>>K678;@76B3D57>
5>73D>K 67>;@73F76 4K 3@ GD43@ >AF 3@6 4>A5= 67E5D;BF;A@ ;@5>G67E F:7 :;EFAD;5
:AGE793D3973@6F:7;DEGDDAG@6;@99DAG@6E
D5:;F75FGD3>7E5D;BF;A@
A5805:3$8-: )75F3@9G>3D'>3@
591:?5;:?5:11@ J
"A9.1>;2'@;>51?
$>59->ED@1>:-8*-88!-@1>5-8? *FG55A
&;;2;:253A>-@5;: ;BB76)AA8
$>59->ED@1>:-8&;;2!-@1>5-8 A?BAE;F;A@)AA8
'<1/5-81-@A>1? 'AD5::;?@7K 7@57 >3EE>A5= >3D76 3H7AD?7D
1:1>-8 >/45@1/@A>-8 1?/>5<@5;: +:;E FIA EFADK D7E;67@57 ;E A8 ?3EA@DK
5A@EFDG5F;A@ 3@6 F:7AD;9;@3>4G;>6;@9:36 3 D75F3@9G>3D 8AAFBD;@FA8RJR
+:;EI3E>3F7D7JB3@676FAF:773EFI;F:3
RJRD73DA@7 EFADKIAA68D3?7
366;F;A@
35;@9 FAI3D6 F:7 I7EF F:7 :AGE7 D7EFE GBA@ 3 E>;9:F>K D3;E76
E3@6EFA@78AG@63F;A@FIA5AGDE7EA8I:;5:3D7H;E;4>73>A@9F:7@ADF:EAGF:
3@6I7EFI3>>E
+:77JF7D;ADI3>>E3D78;@;E:76I;F:B3;@F76EFG55A
+:7:;BB76
DAA8;E8>3D763FF:773H7E3@65AH7D76I;F:5A?BAE;F;A@E:;@9>7E
DAG@6F:7
B7D;?7F7DA8F:773H7E3D7?G>F;B>7E?3>>E:3B76675AD3F;H7IAA64D35=7FEAD
?A6;>>;A@E
D75F3@9G>3D4D;5=5:;?@7K;EBD7E7@FA@F:7@ADF:DAA8E>AB7
+:7
I7EFE>AB7:3E3E?3>>934>766AD?7DI;F:3F:D77 B3DF8;J76I;@6AI
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 22
&88;5;3> >;9;4;>;FK7F7D?;@3F;A@
&1B # $A?1;:8E
-@1 :5@5-8?
1@1>95:108535.81"&
A>AD36AG>FGD3>)7EAGD57*GDH7K 1@1>95:10";@8535.81"&
1@1>95:108535.81'&
D5:;F75FGD3> @H7@FADK AD? 1@1>95:10";@8535.81'&
$-31
;2 "110-@-
;:@>5.A@1?@;18535.81"&5?@>5/@
";:/;:@>5.A@5:3@;18535.81"&5?@>5/@
67@F;8;53F;A@
&1?;A>/1"A9.1> #)
(19<;>->E&1?;A>/1"A9.1> %AFBB>;534>7
;A:@E #3D;?7D
5@E ADFA>>;@E
5?@;>5/A5805:3"-91 @67DEA@ A88 AGE7
A>>1:@A5805:3"-91 %AFBB>;534>7
A5805:300>1??
*
AI7E*F
ADFA>>;@E&
#C:1>"-9100>1?? 7@F7D D77@'DAB7DF;7E##
'
&
AJ
AG>67D&
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 3
Packet Pg. 21
1 LPC Application 7/25/2019
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 20
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 19
1R 'HVFULSWLRQ 'DWH
1 LPC Application 7/25/2019
+LVWRULF &XOWXUDO6XPPDU\
(RZHV6W[LVWLQJ6WUHHW9LHZ+RZHV6W 3URSRVHG9LHZIURP+
([LVWLQJ)URQW +RZHV
(OHYDWLRQ ([LVWLQJ5HDU(OHYDWLRQ
ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2
Packet Pg. 14
TBD
Packet Pg. 11