Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/15/2020 - Landmark Preservation Commission - Agenda - Regular MeetingMeg Dunn, Chair City Council Chambers Alexandra Wallace, Co-Vice Chair City Hall West Michael Bello 300 Laporte Avenue Mollie Bredehoft Fort Collins, Colorado Elizabeth Michell Kevin Murray Anne Nelsen Anna Simpkins Vacant Fort Collins is a Certified Local Government (CLG) authorized by the National Park Service and History Colorado based on its compliance with federal and state historic preservation standards. CLG standing requires Fort Collins to maintain a Landmark Preservation Commission composed of members of which a minimum of 40% meet federal standards for professional experience from preservation-related disciplines, including, but not limited to, historic architecture, architectural history, archaeology, and urban planning. For more information, see Article III, Division 19 of the Fort Collins Municipal Code. The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. Video of the meeting will be broadcast at 1:30 p.m. the following day through the Comcast cable system on Channel 14 or 881 (HD). Please visit http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/ for the daily cable schedule. The video will also be available for later viewing on demand here: http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php. Regular Meeting January 15, 2020 5:30 PM • CALL TO ORDER • ROLL CALL • AGENDA REVIEW o Staff Review of Agenda o Consent Agenda Review This Review provides an opportunity for the Commission and citizens to pull items from the Consent Agenda. Anyone may request an item on this calendar be “pulled” off the Consent Agenda and considered separately.  Commission-pulled Consent Agenda items will be considered before Discussion Items.  Citizen-pulled Consent Agenda items will be considered after Discussion Items. Landmark Preservation Commission AGENDA Packet Pg. 1 • STAFF REPORTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA • PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA • CONSENT AGENDA 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 18, 2020. The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the December 18, 2020 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. 2. REPORT ON STAFF DESIGN REVIEW DECISIONS FOR DESIGNATED PROPERTIES Staff is tasked with reviewing projects and, in cases where the project can be approved without submitting to the Landmarks Preservation Commission, with issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness or a SHPO report under Chapter 14, Article IV of the City’s Municipal Code. This item is a report of all such review decisions since the last regular meeting of the Commission. • CONSENT CALENDAR FOLLOW UP This is an opportunity for Commission members to comment on items adopted or approved on the Consent Calendar. • PULLED FROM CONSENT Any agenda items pulled from the Consent Calendar by a Commission member, or member of the public, will be discussed at this time. • DISCUSSION AGENDA 3. HORSLEY/DELTA ZETA PROPERTY, 201 E. ELIZABETH ST. - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council for landmark designation of the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property. APPLICANT: 201 East Elizabeth Street, LLC, Owner, C/O Stephanie Walter 4. THE BROWN-GOODING HOUSE AT 425 MATHEWS STREET - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council for landmark designation of the Brown-Gooding House at 425 Mathews Street. APPLICANT: Sarah Breseke and Wouter Montfrooij The Consent Agenda is intended to allow the Commission to spend its time and energy on the important items on a lengthy agenda. Staff recommends approval of the Consent Agenda. Anyone may request an item on this calendar to be "pulled" off the Consent Agenda and considered separately. Agenda items pulled from the Consent Agenda will be considered separately under Pulled Consent Items. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda will be approved by Commission with one vote. The Consent Agenda consists of: ● Approval of Minutes ● Items of no perceived controversy ● Routine administrative actions Packet Pg. 2 5. 714 W. MOUNTAIN AVENUE – CARRIAGE HOUSE ALTERATION – DESIGN REVIEW DESCRIPTION: The property owner is seeking approval for an addition to house indoor parking to their existing historic carriage house. This request is based on a conceptual review placed before the LPC in December 2019, which included two options. The owner has selected an option (Option 1) which involves making an addition of one garage bay to the west elevation of the existing structure. The project also proposes replacement in-kind of the wood shingle cladding on the carriage house, and the installation of windows on the gable-end window openings on the upper floor. Staff has issued a Certificate of Appropriateness for the roof replacement. APPLICANT: Henry P. Thode, III 6. 609 S COLLEGE – CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW • OTHER BUSINESS • ADJOURNMENT Packet Pg. 3 This item was pulled from the agenda by the applicant on 1/7/20. Date: Roll Call Bello Bredehoft (Vacant) Michell Murray Nelsen Simpkins Wallace Dunn Vote   —       8 present Consent - 1. Minutes & 2. Staff Design Review Report Bello Murray (Vacant) Michell Wallace Bredehoft Nelsen Simpkins Dunn Yes Yes — Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8-0 3 - 201 E Elizabeth Landmark Designation Murray (Vacant) Michell Wallace Bredehoft Nelsen Simpkins Bello Dunn Recused — Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7-0 4 - 425 Mathews Landmark Designation (Vacant) Michell Wallace Bredehoft Nelsen Simpkins Bello Murray Dunn — Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recused Yes 7-0 5 - 714 W Mountain Design Review Michell Dunn Bredehoft Nelsen Simpkins Bello Murray (Vacant) Wallace Yes Recused No Recused No Yes Yes — Yes 4-2 Roll Call & Voting Record Landmark Preservation Commission 1/15/2020 Landmark Preservation Commission Hearing Date: 1/15/20 Document Log (Any written comments or documents received since the agenda packet was published.) CONSENT AGENDA: 1. Draft Minutes for the LPC December Hearing – minor typo correction 1-14-20 2. Staff Design Review Decisions Report DISCUSSION AGENDA: 3. 201 E Elizabeth Landmark Designation • Updated signature page on application – added to packet 1-14-20 4. 425 Mathews Landmark Designation • Edits to the staff report and staff presentation – added to packet 1-14-20 5. 714 W Mountain Design Review • None EXHIBITS RECEIVED DURING HEARING: Item # Exhibit # Description: 5 A Applicant Presentation 5 B Engineering Letter 5 C Arborist Letter 5 D Plan of Protection Agenda Item 1 Item 1, Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY January 15, 2020 Landmark Preservation Commission STAFF Gretchen Schiager, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 18, 2019 REGULAR MEETING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the December 18, 2019 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS 1. LPC December 18, 2019 Minutes - DRAFT Packet Pg. 4 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 1 December 18, 2019 Meg Dunn, Chair City Council Chambers Alexandra Wallace, Co-Vice Chair City Hall West Kristin Gensmer, Co-Vice Chair 300 Laporte Avenue Michael Bello Fort Collins, Colorado Mollie Bredehoft Kevin Murray Anne Nelsen Katie Paecklar Anna Simpkins Regular Meeting December 18, 2019 Minutes • CALL TO ORDER Chair Dunn called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. • ROLL CALL PRESENT: Bello, Dunn, Gensmer, Murray, Nelsen, Paecklar, Simpkins, Wallace ABSENT: Bredehoft STAFF: Bzdek, Bertolini, Jones, Yatabe, Schiager • AGENDA REVIEW Agenda Item 4 will be heard before Item 3, per the Chair’s request. • STAFF REPORTS None • PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None • CONSENT AGENDA 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 20, 2019 REGULAR MEETING. The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the November 20, 2019 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. 2. REPORT ON STAFF DESIGN REVIEW DECISIONS FOR DESIGNATED PROPERTIES This item is a report of all staff design review decisions for designated properties since the last meeting of the Commission. Landmark Preservation Commission ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 5 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 2 December 18, 2019 Ms. Wallace moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission approve the Consent Agenda of the December 18, 2019 regular meeting as presented. Ms. Paecklar seconded. The motion passed 8-0. • DISCUSSION AGENDA [Secretary’s Note: Agenda item 4 was discussed before item 3] 4. LINDEN STREET IMPROVEMENTS – DESIGN REVIEW DESCRIPTION: Create a “convertible” street on Linden Street from Walnut to Jefferson, combining roadway, on-street parking, pedestrian walkways, event space, placemaking elements, and artwork. APPLICANT: City of Fort Collins Engineering Department (Kyle Lambrecht) Ditesco (Keith Meyer); Russell Mills Studios (Craig Russell) Staff Report Ms. Bzdek presented the staff report. She provided background regarding the Old Town Historic District, noting the public right-of-way is part of the District, and explained the Commission’s role. She reviewed the various components of the proposed design and reminded the Commission that the Secretary of Interior Standards and the Old Town District Standards provide the guidelines for the review. She presented staff findings, suggesting areas for further discussion, including looking carefully at the kinetic lighting feature and the resetting of the historic sandstone pavers that were in front of the Linden Hotel. Applicant Presentation Mr. Lambrecht introduced himself and the other team members present. He briefly discussed the historical use and context for Linden Street. Mr. Russell provided details about the overall site plan. He noted that patios and street trees have limited the current amount of sidewalk space and explained how the plan addresses that challenge by utilizing parallel parking rather than diagonal parking to essentially double the sidewalk width. He talked about new features such as umbrellas, bike racks, and bollards that would be temporary to make room for events. He discussed some of the amenities and materials such as seat walls, pavers, and lighting and how they relate to the adjacent and surrounding areas. Mr. Russell shared some of the design considerations including topography, vegetation, drainage, circulation, and structures as well as accessibility, safety, energy and environmental concerns. He talked about selection and placement of street trees that wouldn’t block visibility to the businesses and detailed the design of the planned kinetic light feature. Mr. Meyer explained how drainage issues and snow removal would be managed. He also described the recent archeological language addition to the plan of protection, per the request of the Commission. Public Input None Commission Questions and Discussion Mr. Bello asked about the impact of the loss of parking spaces. Mr. Meyer replied changing the parking to parallel has resulted in the loss of 30 parking spaces; however, an offset plan has been developed for additional spaces on Walnut and College. Mr. Bello asked who initiated this project. Mr. Meyer replied it was part of a capital improvement plan package approved as part of a ballot initiative. Chair Dunn added that City staff and the DDA had been discussing this for some time. Mr. Bello asked how the businesses in the area are responding. Mr. Meyer stated the majority of stakeholders support the plan. Mr. Murray asked about the location of the kinetic lighting fixture. Mr. Russell discussed creating interest at the convergence of two pedestrian paths and noted the fixture is designed to be more reflective and not to provide direct bright light. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 6 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 3 December 18, 2019 Mr. Murray asked about settling near the Linden Hotel and inquired about meeting ADA requirements and providing proper drainage. Mr. Meyer explained how resetting the sandstone would address this. Mr. Bello asked whether the Commission was to comment on whether this project was needed. Chair Dunn replied the Commission is only responsible for determining whether the project meets the Secretary of Interior standards. Mr. Yatabe explained the motivation for the project is not part of the Commission’s purview. Ms. Nelsen asked about the designer of the light sculpture. Mr. Russell replied there is 1% art budget; however, the light sculpture will not be part of that. The light sculpture is currently being designed with fabricators. Chair Dunn requested additional details about the kinetic light feature. Mr. Russell replied the concept is for the feature to be brushed stainless steel and the light will be reflective and diffused. She asked about the likelihood of children crawling between the bars. Mr. Russell explained the code requirements regarding entrapment and stated the bars are far enough apart to meet those requirements. Chair Dunn also asked about the possibility of the feature collecting trash. Mr. Russell replied the blades are thin. The size and transparency of the feature and its base were discussed. Ms. Nelson asked about the heart behind the design. Mr. Russell discussed the goal of maintaining simplicity and said it wouldn’t be confused with historic features, though its columnar design helps it to relate to Victorian design and area façades. The inspiration for the design was discussed. Ms. Gensmer asked if the kinetic features are near the sandstone pavers. Mr. Russell replied in the negative. Ms. Gensmer asked about the resetting of the sandstone. Mr. Russell replied the pavers will essentially be leveled in order to address ADA requirements. Mr. Murray asked if the dancing ladies' sculptures would be retained. Mr. Russell responded in the affirmative. Chair Dunn asked how close the applicant is to finalizing the design of the kinetic sculptures. Mr. Russell replied this concept has received positive feedback and it is not likely to change significantly other than some technical adjustments. Mr. Bello asked if one-way traffic was considered. Mr. Meyer replied it was considered; however, one-way streets become complicated with adjacent traffic flow. Chair Dunn asked if it would be possible to grant a certificate of acceptability with the caveat the Commission could see the kinetic sculptures before they are finalized as she is concerned about obscuring historic buildings. Mr. Yatabe replied the design review does not appear to include the ability to impose conditions of approval. Commission Discussion Chair Dunn directed the Commission’s attention to the Secretary of Interior standards. Mr. Murray commented the applicant seems to have a handle on the settling of the sandstone pavers. He suggested ensuring there is a way for moisture to drain out. Mr. Meyer clarified the concrete underlayment has a permeable layer underneath it. Ms. Gensmer said the resetting of the sandstone pavers seems appropriate and is glad they are making them ADA compliant. Chair Dunn asked whether it would be important for the placement of the pavers to be the same. Mr. Murray replied that is important and is what is being proposed. Mr. Murray discussed the use of salt weakening the sandstone material. Mr. Meyer explained the Parks department will be responsible for maintenance in this block. Mr. Murry commended the inclusion of that detail in the plans. Ms. Gensmer expressed appreciation for the addition of the archeological section of the plan of protection. Mr. Murray suggested that a website with a 3-D image would be helpful for the Commission to better understand the kinetic light feature. He wondered whether the final design of the feature could come back to the Commission or to staff. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 7 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 4 December 18, 2019 Chair Dunn noted the top portion of the piece is fairly transparent, but she has concerns about the lack of transparency of the lower section. She wondered if the design could be thinned out for the Commission to examine later, while still issuing the certificate of appropriateness at this time. Ms. Paecklar asked whether they could ask for sculptures to be removed after they are installed. Chair Dunn replied she thought it could be part of the discussion upon further redevelopment. Mr. Meyer said they would be happy to work with the Commission on the design of the piece but would ask that it not hold up approval. Ms. Nelsen commented that the lower columns would be 13” apart, so it isn’t likely to block anything. Mr. Russell noted the angle at which it is viewed might change how transparent it is. Ms. Gensmer said they wouldn’t want anything bigger than a 30” diameter and wouldn’t want the structure to be any taller than presented. She stated the upper portion is sufficiently transparent and commented that primary views should be considered when evaluating transparency. Ms. Simpkins stated there is merit to having something there to draw people to the area. Ms. Nelsen stated context images would be helpful. Mr. Meyer agreed to provide that when available. Commission Deliberation Mr. Bello moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission approve the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the Linden Street Development Project within the Old Town Historic District, finding it is in compliance with the standards provided in Chapter 14 of the Fort Collins Municipal Code, based on agreement with the findings of fact presented in the staff report. Ms. Simpkins seconded. The motion passed 8-0. 3. THE FORT COLLINS EXPRESS/McCORMICK BUILDING AND THE McCORMICK APARTMENTS, 155 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE, APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council for landmark designation of the Fort Collins Express/McCormick Building and the McCormick Apartments. APPLICANT: Mountain 155, LLC/Hello Investments, LLC (Josh Harrison, contact) Staff Report Ms. Jones presented the staff report. She identified the location of the property and provided historic background of the Express newspaper building and McCormick Apartments. She detailed some of the architectural features of the building and previous alterations noting a window study was conducted for both buildings in 2019. She stated the Express building, constructed in 1907 and 1909, is significant under standard one, events, and standard three, design and construction. The McCormick Apartments building, built in 1917 and 1925, is significant under standard three, design and construction. Both structures retain all seven aspects of integrity. Applicant Presentation None Public Input None Commission Questions and Discussion Chair Dunn asked if anyone had concerns about the historic additions to the building, noting they all happened in 1936 or earlier; therefore, they are all historic of their own right. Chair Dunn requested input as to the reconfigured and secondary entrance added to the Mason Street building. Mr. Murray commented that the windows could be put back where they were previously filled in. Chair Dunn asked for comments on the modern alterations. Ms. Wallace and Ms. Gensmer did not think the alterations impact the historic character of the buildings. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 8 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 5 December 18, 2019 Mr. Murray commented on the brick knee wall around the stairway which was installed after a flood. He stated it is important to keep for that reason but does not take away from the building. Ms. Nelsen commented on the use of the building in its time. Commission Deliberation Mr. Murray moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend that City Council adopt an ordinance to designate the Fort Collins Express/McCormick Building and the McCormick Apartments, 155 West Mountain Avenue, as a Fort Collins Landmark, finding that this property is eligible for its significance to Fort Collins under Standards 1 and 3, events and design/construction, and 3, design/construction, respectively, as supported by the analysis provided in the staff report dated December 18, 2019, and that the property clearly conveys this significance through all seven aspects of integrity; and finding also that the designation of this property will promote the policies and purposes of the City as specified in Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code. Ms. Gensmer seconded. The motion passed 8-0. [Secretary’s Note: The Commission took a short break at this time.] 5. 714 W. MOUNTAIN AVENUE – CARRIAGE HOUSE ALTERATION – CONCEPTUAL REVIEW DESCRIPTION: The property owner is seeking input on two potential options to add additional indoor parking to their existing historic carriage house. Option 1 is an addition of one garage bay to the west elevation of the existing structure. Option 2 is the enclosure of an existing carport into a garage bay. The project also proposes replacement of the wood shingle roof with asphalt shingles, the replacement in-kind of the wood shingle cladding on the carriage house, and the replacement of the gable-end window on the upper floor. APPLICANT: Henry P. Thode, III. Chair Dunn and Ms. Nelsen recused themselves from this item due to conflicts of interest. Vice Chair Gensmer chaired this item. Staff Report Mr. Bertolini presented the staff report noting the property still belongs to the Thode family. He provided background about the historic resources on the property. He noted that the garage doors are historic, but are coming off the tracks, which is part of the reason for the application. He clarified that this is a conceptual review only at this time and explained the Commission's role. Mr. Bertolini stated the owner is hoping to increase the enclosed garage space to accommodate two vehicles, create a functioning garage door, and provide insulation for the structure, and has provided two options for consideration. The first option would place an addition on the west side of the carriage house, open the rear-facing garage bay that is currently shingled over, rehabilitate the wood windows, and replace the existing south-facing garage doors. He stated staff finds this proposal has problems with standards two, five and six, primarily dealing with the retention of historic materials. Mr. Bertolini stated the second option proposed by the applicant's consultant involves enclosing the existing carport that was constructed in 1986 into a heated space for a second vehicle and the replacement of the wood windows along the west elevation. Staff finds there are issues with standards relating to retention of historic materials and compatible design for this option. Applicant Presentation Jeff Gaines with High Craft Builders gave the Applicant presentation. He discussed the efforts to address the owner’s priorities, described the design process, and provided details about the plans and options. He discussed the weathered condition of the siding and noted there are composition shingles currently in place which would be replaced. He stated the carport is attached to the carriage house with a ledger and could be removed. He talked about structural issues with the garage from the bowing of the roof. Public Input None ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 9 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 6 December 18, 2019 Commission Questions Mr. Bello suggested that option 2 would be most reversable. He asked if the asphalt shingles had to be replaced with wood. Mr. Bertolini replied replacement in kind is the requirement; therefore, asphalt shingles could be used. Mr. Bello noted the siding is wood shingles and asked if the City allows their replacement in kind. Mr. Bertolini replied they are allowed with certain fire-retardant treatments, mostly for historic buildings. Ms. Simpkins asked about the date of the carport. Mr. Bertolini asked Mr. Thode to address that. Mr. Thode replied he believes the carport was installed in the mid-1970's but is not completely certain. Mr. Bertolini commented that information in the staff report may be inaccurate based on an error in the original nomination which mentioned a building permit for the carport from 1986. Mr. Murray commented on the windows which appear to be arched. Mr. Gaines replied that the framing on the inside of the garage, which is visible in the attic, seems to have a square opening. Ms. Simpkins asked about the sliding doors and proposed access for option 2. Mr. Gaines replied option 2 would retain the sliding garage doors. Ms. Simpkins asked if the carport would be removed in option 1. Mr. Gaines replied the carport still serves a purpose. Mr. Thode explained his father built the carport to avoid scraping snow off the car windows and protect the car from tree debris. Ms. Simpkins asked if the proposal is to replace the wood siding in kind. Mr. Gaines replied in the affirmative. Mr. Murray recommended the applicant consider using the design assistance program. He asked if the door could be moved and reused and suggested they research old photos. He commented that the cedar shingles are expected to be disposable if they are in bad shape. Mr. Murray asked if the upstairs would be used for anything. Mr. Gaines replied it would be used for storage. Mr. Murray stated it should be weather-tight. Mr. Murray asked if the carport was present when the property was landmarked. Mr. Bertolini replied in the affirmative but stated the exact year of its construction is unknown. The property was landmarked in 2015. Mr. Thode commented on the trash enclosure his father built noting it is newer than the carport. Ms. Simpkins stated carriage houses she has studied occasionally do have double doors on one side. Mr. Murray replied the lack of structure on the south wall is not good construction. Mr. Murray commented on ensuring anything attached can be undone without destroying the original structure. Mr. Gaines stated either option could be removed as either would be structurally independent. Mr. Bello asked why a free-standing garage that wouldn’t impact the existing building couldn't be constructed. Mr. Gaines replied Mr. Thode does not prefer a second structure but would like a heated two-car garage and shop. Additionally, the creation of a new structure would make most of the rear yard covered in buildings and would also obscure windows. Mr. Murray asked why the 9-pane windows are proposed to be replaced. Mr. Gaines replied they are proposed for replacement in option 2 because of their condition and lack of insulation power. Mr. Murray stated the Commission would prefer the rehabilitation of old windows if possible. Mr. Murray stated there may be some design issues around fitting most vehicles into the original opening. Mr. Thode replied his second car is a 1967 Corvette and would therefore fit. Commission Discussion Vice Chair Gensmer requested input on reopening the north garage entry and installing a new operable door. Mr. Bello replied it would make sense to reinstall a door that was originally present, though he would like to see sensitivity in the type of door. Mr. Murray suggested being creative with the doors. Ms. Paecklar said this is a challenging project given the building's landmarked status, unless this is a rehabilitation project rather than a restoration. Vice Chair Gensmer agreed a door was originally present and stated the Commission or staff would need to see the replacement as part of a final approval. Ms. Wallace agreed and stated the size of the door should remain the same as the current opening. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 10 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 7 December 18, 2019 Vice Chair Gensmer requested input on wood shingle siding replacement. Mr. Murray replied it would make sense to replace the shingles if they are in bad shape and suggested that be further discussed. Vice Chair Gensmer requested input on the replacement of the one-by-one window in the south gable end above the carport. Mr. Bertolini clarified there would be two windows replaced, one of which is currently just a screen. Vice Chair Gensmer stated the Commission would want details on those windows for a final review. Vice Chair Gensmer requested input on option 1. Mr. Bello replied that option does more harm to the building's character than does option 2, which preserves three sides of the building. Ms. Simpkins replied option 1 is stylistically more typical of what would be seen as an addition on a historic building. She asked what cladding material would be used for either option. Mr. Gaines replied both additions would be lap siding. Ms. Wallace asked to see views from other angles. Mr. Thode stated the large pine tree would almost completely hide the addition from the street. Vice Chair Gensmer said a rendering showing that would be helpful for final review. Mr. Murray asked about the placement of the tree, which was answered by a photo in the presentation. Mr. Bertolini stated it would be helpful for the Commission to provide enough feedback for the applicant to decide on the best option that could be approved by the Commission. Mr. Murray said he would like either option not to structurally affect the original carriage house if it were removed. Ms. Paecklar stated the addition should be reversable and the original carriage house shouldn’t be changed or affected. Vice Chair Gensmer provided specific requests as to what additional information the Commission would want to see for the next review. She referred to standards 9 and 10. Mr. Murray commented the carport exists now and affects the look of the carriage house. He suggested enclosing it may be the better option. Ms. Wallace stated the doors are character-defining and they would be lost from the front elevation in option 2. Vice Chair Gensmer asked if the goal is to replace the doors regardless of the option. Mr. Gaines replied there is no absolute preference and they are looking for guidance as to which option is the preferred route. He stated the general preference would be to have an overhead garage door which would be more functional and heat efficient. Mr. Thode discussed the existing air gap between the two doors. Mr. Murray stated that while it may be difficult to insulate those doors, it could be done. He stated he would like to see that historic feature remain. Ms. Paecklar stated option 1 seems to be more subordinate to the existing carriage house. She noted option 2 is almost 2 feet wider and is in front of the existing carriage house. Vice Chair Gensmer stated she is struggling with the considerations of the removal of historic fabric and the identification of the character-defining features. She stated she is leaning more toward option 2; however, if option 1 is chosen, she would like to keep the door if possible. Ms. Wallace asked if there were any other examples of additions to carriage houses on landmarks. Mr. Bertolini replied he was not aware of any, but staff could research that. Ms. Paecklar stated there aren’t many designated carriage houses in Fort Collins. Mr. Bertolini stated they are sometimes forgotten on older designations. Mr. Murray stated option 1 is the best visually; however, the roof already exists in option 2 and putting walls below it seems to make the most sense. Ms. Wallace stated she prefers option 1 citing the larger footprint of option 2 and option 1's sensitivity to the existing structure. She stated the carport appears like a large awning and not like a footprint addition to the property. Vice Chair Gensmer asked about the footprint square footage of both options. Mr. Gaines replied option 1 would probably be about half the enclosed square footage. Ms. Simpkins noted option 2 doubles the length. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 11 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 8 December 18, 2019 Mr. Bello agreed option 1 is visually more appealing; however, he expressed concern about putting a door in the side of the carriage house that was not historical. Vice Chair Gensmer asked if the Commission could take an informal poll. Mr. Yatabe cautioned against it. Mr. Murray stated the most important aspect should be keeping as much original fabric as possible and trying not to affect the original building as much as possible. Ms. Wallace requested the applicant look at options for siding that may not be as stark. Ms. Bzdek stated it may be helpful for the Commission to provide comments on an evaluation of the compatibility of any new construction with the primary residence. Ms. Paecklar suggested making a list of other carriage houses that have had an addition. Vice Chair Gensmer asked about the wall cladding on the primary residence. Mr. Thode replied it is now wood cladding, not shingles, and he believes the stonework on the step columns was done about 40 years ago. Ms. Bzdek asked about the spatial relationship between the primary residence and new construction. Mr. Murray replied that is not an issue as the carport already exists and the proposed addition would be hidden behind a tree. Ms. Simpkins asked if the applicant is planning to repaint the carriage house. Mr. Gaines replied there is some interest in repainting the new shingles and asked if paint color would be part of this review. Mr. Murray replied there was no paint on the shingles when the site was landmarked and suggested the applicant work with staff. Ms. Paecklar suggested looking at an entire property site plan showing the primary building would be helpful. Mr. Gaines asked Mr. Bello for more detail on his concerns. Mr. Bello replied he is concerned about the reversibility of the addition. Vice Chair Gensmer suggested the garage door seems to be the primary feature; however, leaving windows intact helps with reversibility and maintaining historic fabric. Chair Dunn returned to the meeting. • OTHER BUSINESS Chair Dunn thanked Ms. Gensmer for all her contributions to the Commission and for chairing the last item. Ms. Gensmer stated this was her last meeting as she was term-limited and made some parting comments. • ADJOURNMENT Chair Dunn adjourned the meeting at 8:47 p.m. Minutes prepared by Tara Leman, Tripoint Data, and respectfully submitted by Gretchen Schiager. Minutes approved by a vote of the Commission on __________________. _____________________________________ Meg Dunn, Chair ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 12 Agenda Item 2 Item 2, Page 1 STAFF REPORT January 15, 2020 Landmark Preservation Commission ITEM NAME STAFF DESIGN REVIEW DECISIONS ON DESIGNATED PROPERTIES, DECEMBER 5, 2019 TO JANUARY 2, 2020 STAFF Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner INFORMATION Staff is tasked with reviewing projects and, in cases where the project can be approved without submitting to the Landmarks Preservation Commission, with issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness or a SHPO report under Chapter 14, Article IV of the City’s Municipal Code. Staff decisions are provided in this report and posted on the HPD’s “Design Review Notification” page. Notice of staff decisions are provided to the public and LPC for their information, but are not subject to appeal under Chapter 14, Article IV, except in cases where an applicant has requested a Certificate of Appropriateness for a project and that request has been denied. In that event, the applicant may appeal staff’s decision to the LPC pursuant to 14-55 of the Municipal Code, within two weeks of staff denial. The report below covers the period between December 5, 2019 and January 2, 2020. Property Address Description of Project Staff Decision Date of Decision 220 Linden St. Rear alley patio installation. Old Town Historic District. Reviewed by staff under Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV. Approved w/ conditions 12/5/2019 147 S. College Ave. Full rehab to include modifications to rear entry and courtyard, including new doors (no work to exterior façade). Project adjusted to avoid demolition of historic material. Commercial project (Landmark eligible). Reviewed by staff under Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV. Approved 12/5/2019 228 Whedbee St. In-kind roof replacement (asphalt shingle). Contributing property to Laurel School Historic District (NRHP). Reviewed by staff under Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV. Approved 12/10/2019 601 Mathews St. After-the-fact in-kind roof replacement (asphalt shingle). Contributing property to Laurel School Historic District (NRHP). Reviewed by staff under Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV. Approved 12/12/2019 324 E. Oak St. Installation of 6’ wood privacy fence in rear yard and 3’ metal fence around front yard perimeter. City Landmark. Reviewed by staff under Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV. Approved w/ conditions 12/13/2019 700 Remington St. Replacement of upper-story window on carriage house to meet code required fire egress. City Landmark. Reviewed by staff under Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV. Approved w/ conditions 12/17/2019 Packet Pg. 13 Agenda Item 2 Item 2, Page 2 415 E. Laurel St. In-kind roof replacement (asphalt shingle). Contributing property to Laurel School Historic District (NRHP). Reviewed by staff under Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV. Approved 12/19/2019 Packet Pg. 14 Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 1 STAFF REPORT January 15, 2020 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME HORSLEY/DELTA ZETA PROPERTY, 201 E. ELIZABETH ST. - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION STAFF Reyana Jones, Historic Preservation Specialist PROJECT INFORMATION APPLICANT: 201 East Elizabeth Street, LLC, Owner, C/O Stephanie Walter PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council for landmark designation of the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property. COMMISSION’S ROLE AND ACTION: One of the Commission’s responsibilities is to provide a recommendation to City Council on applications for the designation of a property as a Fort Collins Landmark. Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code provides the standards and process for designation. At the hearing, the Commission shall determine whether the following two (2) criteria are satisfied: (1) the proposed resource is eligible for designation; and (2) the requested designation will advance the policies and the purposes in a manner and extent sufficient to justify the requested designation. Following its review, and once the Commission feels it has the information it needs, the Commission should adopt a motion providing its recommendation on the property’s Landmark eligibility to City Council. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has determined that the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property is eligible for Fort Collins Landmark designation, having significance under Standards 1, Events, and 3, Design/Construction, and retaining all seven aspects of integrity. Staff recommends that the Landmark Preservation Commission approval a motion to Council recommending landmark designation. STAFF EVALUATION OF REVIEW CRITERIA STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE and EXTERIOR INTEGRITY Staff has determined that the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property is eligible under Standards 1 and 3. Standards of Significance: Significance is the importance of a site, structure, object or district to the history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture of our community, State or Nation. For designation as Fort Collins Landmarks or Fort Collins Landmark Districts properties must meet one (1) or more of the following standards: Packet Pg. 15 Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 2 Standard 1: Events The resource is associated with events that have made a recognizable contribution to the broad patterns of the history of the community, State or Nation. A resource can be associated with either or both of two (2) types of events: * A specific event marking an important moment in Fort Collins prehistory or history; and/or * A pattern of events or a historic trend that made a recognizable contribution to the development of the community, State or Nation. The Horsley/Delta Zeta Property at 201 E. Elizabeth St. is significant under Standard 1 for its association with midcentury university fraternity and sorority life in Fort Collins. In the early to mid-twentieth century, the chapter house became solidified as a central component of the social functioning of Greek organizations across America. Because of their historical and classical associations, chapter houses in Revival styles, like Colonial Revival, Greek Revival, or the Tudor-revival style of the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property, were popular among sororities and fraternities during this period. The Delta Zeta sorority purchased this property in 1945. The Delta Zetas experienced peak membership in this chapter house, which they used for about fifteen years. Around the time the Delta Zetas moved into this house, many other fraternities and sororities moved to the same area just east of campus. This house was used by two other Greek organizations, the Triangle Fraternity (1979- 2006) and Phi Kappa Tau (2015-Present). YES Standard 2: Persons/ Groups The resource is associated with the lives of persons or groups of persons recognizable in the history of the community, State or Nation whose specific contributions to that history can be identified and documented. N/A Standard 3: Design/ Construction The resource embodies the identifiable characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; represents the work of a craftsman or architect whose work is distinguishable from others by its characteristic style and quality; possesses high artistic values or design concepts; or is part of a recognizable and distinguishable group of resources. The resource may be significant not only for the way it was originally constructed or crafted, but also for the way it was adapted at a later period, or for the way it illustrates changing tastes, attitudes, and/or uses over time. The Horsley/Delta Zeta Property is also significant under Standard 3, Design/Construction, as an excellent example of Tudor-revival Style architecture, a relatively uncommon style in Fort Collins. The 1925 house features a steeply-pitched roof with tile shingles, half-timbering in the upper story, and additional exterior texture from brick in the first story, all character-defining features of the Tudor-revival Style. This house has asymmetrical massing, accentuated by the projecting brick vestibule on the west elevation, and predominantly narrow windows, also indicative of the Tudor-revival Style. Additionally, architect Lester L. Jones designed this building, one of only four architects working in Fort Collins in the early 1920s. Jones’s designs included the Armstrong Hotel and the Masonic Temple in Johnstown, among others. This property is one of a small number of Jones’s known residential designs in Fort Collins. YES Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 3 Standards of Integrity Integrity is the ability of a site, structure, object or district to be able to convey its significance. The integrity of a resource is based on the degree to which it retains all or some of seven (7) aspects or qualities established by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. All seven qualities do not need to be present for a site, structure, object or district to be eligible as long as the overall sense of past time and place is evident. Standard 1: Location Location is the place where the resource was constructed or the place where the historic or prehistoric event occurred. The Horsley/Delta Zeta Property has not been moved. YES Standard 2: Design Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan space, structure and style of a resource. The exterior design of the house on the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property has changed very little since its 1926 construction. In 1951, the Delta Zeta sorority had five basement windows enlarged and a fire ladder installed as part of a renovation project, and in 1978, then-owner A. M. “Sandy” Oskamp had basement windows replaced with egress windows. At one time, the front door accentuated the medieval character of the Tudor Revival house and had large metal straps, but the design of the front door and its sidelights was changed within the last five years. The section of wall with half-timbering on the first story of the east elevation, including the multi-light windows and door, porch, and nearby basement stairway, may or may not be original to the house. There are no building permits for it, but these elements do not appear on tax assessor sketches of the property from 1948 or 1968 or on the 1925/43 Sanborn map. They are, however, obscured from the sidewalk and street by a fence. YES Standard 3: Setting Setting is the physical environment of a resource. Setting refers to the character of the place; it involves how, not just where, the resource is situated and its relationship to the surrounding features and open space. The property’s setting has remained consistent. It is still surrounded by other residential properties, many of which were constructed in the same era. The neighborhood retains its historic character for these reasons, and this property contributes to that character. Furthermore, this property is across the street from two other houses used as “annexes” for the Delta Zeta sorority members (202 E. Elizabeth St. and 1011 Remington St.), according to former Delta Zeta Norma L. Andersen. YES Packet Pg. 17 Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 4 Standard 4: Materials Materials are the physical elements that form a resource. This house still has many of its historic materials. For instance, all of the windows on the first and upper stories appear to be historic wood casement windows, and the south elevation door also appears historic, as does the basement door. In addition to the house’s primary material, brick, the curved stone path and stone details on both the front porch and south elevation porch have been retained. The half-timbering in the upper half-story as well as the prominent brick chimneys are also unchanged. Although the house has undergone several re-roofings, the roof material is still semi-cylindrical tile. The most significant loss of materials on this property was the 1978 demolition of the brick garage on the east side of the lot, which was built in 1926. There is now a parking lot in its place. Most of the house’s material loss impacted basement windows and doors. Some of the basement windows on the east elevation were filled in with masonry at an unknown date. Several of the other basement windows, like those on the north and south elevations, were replaced with sliders, some in 1951, and some again in 1978. A 1997 survey by Jason Marmor describes the front door as having “brass or bronze straps extending from [its] hinges, accentuating [the] medieval appearance;” based on Google Street View imagery, this door and its sidelights were replaced between 2014 and 2016. YES Standard 5: Workmanship Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. It is the evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering a building, structure or site. The Horsley/Delta Zeta Property retains integrity of its historic workmanship. Architectural details indicating the workmanship of the original builder include the flared roofline on the west elevation’s gable, the decorative half-timbering in the upper story, and the brickwork on the three prominent chimneys, window sills and lintels, and east elevation bay. The bricks that make up the house themselves are artfully irregular and multi-toned as well. YES Standard 6: Feeling Feeling is a resource’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period or time. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the resource's historic or prehistoric character. This house continues to feel like an early-twentieth century residence in a neighborhood adjacent to a major university. On an oversized corner lot, it was designed as an impressive mansion for a well-to-do Fort Collins farmer and ranchman, Leslie Horsley, and his family, and this feeling of grandeur remains. YES Packet Pg. 18 Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 5 Standard 7: Association Association is the direct link between an important event or person and a historic or prehistoric resource. A resource retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. This property’s association with sorority and fraternity history in Fort Collins is well preserved because of its continued use by a fraternity. The house currently serves as a chapter house for Phi Kappa Tau fraternity, as it did for the Triangle Fraternity and Delta Zeta sorority before them. In addition to the house’s proximity to Colorado State University, the parking lot to the house’s east side is a modern allusion to this historic and current use. YES ALIGNMENT WITH CITY CODE AND PURPOSE The designation of historic properties and the work of historic preservation promote the policies and purposes adopted by City Council for the City of Fort Collins. Designation furthers the City’s goals of environmental, economic, and social sustainability. By continuing the use of an existing building and preserving the embodied energy of its existing materials, landmark designation is environmentally sustainable. The designation of historic properties also contributes to the City’s economic standing directly, through property, use, and sales taxes and revenues, and indirectly, through the promotion of heritage tourism. Furthermore, historic designation encourages the continuation of private property ownership. The City’s cultural standing is also upheld because the preservation of the built environment helps residents and visitors tangibly gain a better understanding of our history and the diversity of people who shaped Fort Collins. Landmark designation enhances and perpetuates significant resources in the City through the protection and acknowledgement of those historic properties as well as through the financial incentives offered to landmark owners. Finally, the designation of historic properties also maintains and enhances the City’s aesthetics through the protection and recognition of significant local architecture and history, contributing to the promotion of good urban design and fostering civic pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past. Taken together, these benefits of landmark designation help strengthen Fort Collins’s community and support our vision of a livable, sustainable city. (Municipal Code 14-1 and 14-2; City Plan) The landmark designation of the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property aligns with City of Fort Collins purposes and policies. For example, Municipal Code 14-2 (e) focuses on the promotion of historical structures for “education, stimulation and welfare of people of the City.” Landmark designation of this building, which was historically, and still is, associated with university Greek letter organizations, provides educational opportunities for neighbors and chapter members to recognize and be proud of that part of Fort Collins history. Fort Collins City Plan identifies Neighborhood Livability and Social Health as one if its primary outcome areas. Under that outcome area, Policy LIV 6.3 concerns encouraging student housing near or on campus in areas well-served by public transportation. Because this property currently serves as a fraternity house and is situated near campus, it aligns with this policy. This property is within walking distance of Colorado State University, with which its current fraternity tenant is associated. It is also nearby several public transportation lines, including the rapid transit line two blocks away, allowing greater spatial freedom to the house’s tenants. FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION FINDINGS OF FACT: In evaluating the request for a recommendation to City Council regarding landmark designation for the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property, staff makes the following findings of fact: 1. That all owners of the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property have consented in writing to this request for Fort Collins Landmark designation of the property; 2. That the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property has significance to Fort Collins under Significance Standard 1, Events, and Standard 3, Design/Construction, as supported by the analysis provided in this staff report; Packet Pg. 19 Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 6 3. That the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property has integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association to convey its significance as supported by the analysis provided in this staff report; 4. That the designation will advance the policies and purposes stated in the code in a manner and extent sufficient to justify the requested designation, as supported by the analysis provided in this staff report. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission adopt a motion to Council recommending the landmark designation of the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property. SAMPLE MOTIONS SAMPLE MOTION FOR APPROVAL: I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend that City Council adopt an ordinance to designate the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property at 201 E. Elizabeth St., as a Fort Collins Landmark, finding that this property is eligible for its significance to Fort Collins under Standards 1, Events, and 3, Design/Construction, as supported by the analysis provided in the staff report dated January 15, 2020, and that the property clearly conveys this significance through all seven aspects of integrity; and finding also that the designation of this property will promote the policies and purposes of the City as specified in Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code. SAMPLE MOTION FOR DENIAL: I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend that City Council does not adopt an ordinance to designate the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property at 201 E. Elizabeth St., as a Fort Collins Landmark, finding that this property is not eligible because of a lack of significance or the failure of the property to convey its significance through its integrity, and/or finding that the designation of this property will not promote the policies and purposes of the City as specified in Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code. ATTACHMENTS 1. Landmark Designation Application 2. Staff Presentation 3. Location Map Packet Pg. 20 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Fort Collins Landmark Designation LOCATION INFORMATION Address: 201 East Elizabeth Street Legal Description: Lot 2 and North 20 feet of Lot 3, Block 5, Crafts Re-subdivision, Fort Collins Property Name (historic and/or common): Horsley/Delta Zeta Property OWNER INFORMATION Name: 201 East Elizabeth Street, LLC, C/O Stephanie Walter Phone: (303) 233-2288 Email: swalter@farmersagent.com Mailing Address: 10025 W. 23rd Ave., Lakewood, CO 80215-1407 CLASSIFICATION Category Ownership Status Present Use Existing Designation Building Public Occupied Commercial Nat’l Register Structure Private Unoccupied Educational State Register Site Religious Object Residential District Entertainment Government Other FORM PREPARED BY Name and Title: Reyana Jones Address: 281 N. College Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80524 Phone: (970) 416-4250 Email: preservation@fcgov.com DATE: December 19, 2019 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 21 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 TYPE OF DESIGNATION and BOUNDARIES Individual Landmark Property Landmark District Explanation of Boundaries: The boundaries of the property being designated as a Fort Collins Landmark correspond to the legal description of the property, above. The property (hereinafter the “Property”) consists of the house, constructed in 1926 (parcel no. 9713309002). STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE and INTEGRITY Properties are eligible for designation if they possess both significance and integrity. Significance is the importance of a site, structure, object or district to the history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture of our community, State or Nation. For designation as Fort Collins Landmarks or Fort Collins Landmark Districts properties must meet one (1) or more of the following standards set forth in Fort Collins Municipal Code Section 14-22(a): Standard 1: Events This property is associated with events that have made a recognizable contribution to the broad patterns of the history of the community, State or Nation. It is associated with either (or both) of these two (2) types of events: a) A specific event marking an important moment in Fort Collins prehistory or history; and/or b) A pattern of events or a historic trend that made a recognizable contribution to the development of the community, State or Nation. The Horsley/Delta Zeta Property at 201 E. Elizabeth St. is significant under Standard 1, Events, for its association with midcentury university fraternity and sorority life in Fort Collins. In the early to mid-twentieth century, the chapter house became solidified as a central component of the social functioning of Greek organizations across America. Because of their historical and classical associations, chapter houses in Revival styles, like Colonial Revival, Greek Revival, or the Tudor-revival style of the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property, were popular among sorority and fraternity houses during this period. In the early to mid-twentieth century, some fraternities and sororities in Fort Collins were able to construct dedicated chapter houses, like the Delta Delta Delta sorority at 1504 Remington St., but many others could not. Instead, some Greek societies opted to purchase already-existing mansions and convert them into chapter houses. The Delta Zeta sorority purchased this property in 1945 and moved in for the 1946-47 school year. The Delta Zetas experienced peak membership in this chapter house toward the end of the 1950s. Around the time the Delta Zetas moved into this house, many other fraternities and sororities moved to the same area just east of campus, such as the Phi Delta Theta Fraternity at 200 E. Plum St. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 22 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 This house was used by two other Greek organizations, a use that continues today. The Triangle Fraternity, focused on engineering, architecture, and science, occupied the house from 1979-2006. Phi Kappa Tau, a fraternity that emphasizes “brotherhood, learning, and ethical leadership,”1 has occupied the house since 2015. Standard 2: Persons/Groups This property is associated with the lives of persons or groups of persons recognizable in the history of the community, State or Nation whose specific contributions to that history can be identified and documented. Standard 3: Design/Construction This property embodies the identifiable characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; represents the work of a craftsman or architect whose work is distinguishable from others by its characteristic style and quality; possesses high artistic values or design concepts; or is part of a recognizable and distinguishable group of properties. The Horsley/Delta Zeta Property is also significant under Standard 3, Design/Construction, as an excellent example of Tudor-revival Style architecture, a relatively uncommon style in Fort Collins. The 1925 house features a steeply-pitched roof with tile shingles, half-timbering in the upper story, and additional exterior texture from brick in the first story, all character-defining features of the Tudor-revival Style. This house has asymmetrical massing, accentuated by the projecting brick vestibule on the west elevation, and predominantly narrow windows, also indicative of the Tudor-revival Style. Additionally, architect Lester L. Jones designed this building, one of only four architects working in Fort Collins in the early 1920s. Jones’s designs included the Armstrong Hotel and the Masonic Temple in Johnstown, among others, and he was described as an “important figure associated with the International Style in pre-war Denver,”2 according to Casper Hegner, another pre-war Denver architect. This property is one of a small number of Jones’s known residential designs in Fort Collins. Standard 4: Information Potential This property has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Integrity is the ability of a site, structure, object or district to be able to convey its significance. The integrity of a resource is based on the degree to which it retains all or some of seven (7) aspects or qualities set forth in Fort Collins Municipal Code Section 14-22(b): location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. All 1 “Fraternity,” Phi Kappa Tau, https://www.phikappatau.org/about/fraternity. 2 Tamsen Kiehnhoff, interview with Casper Hegner, April 10, 1990, paraphrased in the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form for the Denver Public Library by Rodd Wheaton and Michael Paglia, June 19, 1990. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 23 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 seven qualities do not need to be present for a site, structure, object or district to be eligible as long as the overall sense of past time and place is evident. Standard 1: Location is the place where the resource was constructed or the place where the historic or prehistoric event occurred. The Horsley/Delta Zeta Property has not been moved. Standard 2: Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan space, structure and style of a resource. The exterior design of the house on the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property has changed very little since its 1926 construction. In 1951, the Delta Zeta sorority had five basement windows enlarged and a fire ladder installed as part of a renovation project,3 and in 1978, then-owner A. M. “Sandy” Oskamp had basement windows replaced with egress windows.4 At one time, the front door accentuated the medieval character of the Tudor Revival house and had large metal straps, but the design of the front door and its sidelights was changed within the last five years. The section of wall with half-timbering on the first story of the east elevation, including the multi-light windows and door, porch, and nearby basement stairway, may or may not be original to the house. There are no building permits for it, but these elements do not appear on tax assessor sketches of the property from 1948 or 1968 or on the 1925/43 Sanborn map.5 They are, however, obscured from the sidewalk and street by a fence. Standard 3: Setting is the physical environment of a resource. Setting refers to the character of the place; it involves how, not just where, the resource is situated and its relationship to the surrounding features and open space. The property’s setting has remained consistent. It is still surrounded by other residential properties, many of which were constructed in the same era. The neighborhood retains its historic character for these reasons, and this property contributes to that character. Furthermore, this property is across the street from two other houses used as “annexes” for the Delta Zeta sorority members (202 E. Elizabeth St. and 1011 Remington St.), according to former Delta Zeta Norma L. Andersen.6 Standard 4: Materials are the physical elements that form a resource. This house still has many of its historic materials. For instance, all of the windows on the first and upper stories appear to be historic wood casement windows, and the south elevation door also appears historic, as does the basement door. In addition to the house’s primary material, brick, the curved stone path and stone details on both the 3 Building Permit #12360, 1002 Remington St., Delta Zeta Sorority, July 17, 1951, Building Permit Collection, Fort Collins History Connection: An Online Collaboration Between the FCMoD and the PRPLD, http://history.fcgov.com/collections/building-permits. 4 Building Permit #60334, 201 E. Elizabeth St., Sandy Oskamp, February 16, 1978, City of Fort Collins Public Records Database, http://citydocs.fcgov.com/. 5 “Lots 2 and N 20 Ft Lot 3, Blk 5, Crafts Resub,” Tax Assessor Records 1948 and 1968, Tax Assessor Card Collection, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO. 6 Carl McWilliams, “Residential Building at 201 E. Elizabeth Street: Delta Zeta Sorority, Triangle Fraternity,” April 16, 2015, Digital Property File Collection, City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Services, Community Development and Neighborhood Services Building, Fort Collins, CO. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 24 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 front porch and south elevation porch have been retained. The half-timbering in the upper half-story as well as the prominent brick chimneys are also unchanged. Although the house has undergone several re-roofings, the roof material is still semi-cylindrical tile. The most significant loss of materials on this property was the 1978 demolition of the brick garage on the east side of the lot, which was built in 1926; there are no known historic photos of this garage. There is now a parking lot in its place. Most of the house’s material loss impacted basement windows and doors. Some of the basement windows on the east elevation were filled in with masonry at an unknown date. Several of the other basement windows, like those on the north and south elevations, were replaced with sliders, some in 1951, and some again in 1978. A 1997 survey done by Jason Marmor describes the front door as having “brass or bronze straps extending from [its] hinges, accentuating [the] medieval appearance;”7 based on Google Street View imagery, this door and its sidelights were replaced between 2014 and 2016. Standard 5: Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. It is the evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering a building, structure or site. The Horsley/Delta Zeta Property retains integrity of its historic workmanship. Architectural details indicating the workmanship of the original builder include the flared roofline on the west elevation’s gable, the decorative half-timbering in the upper story, and the brickwork on the three prominent chimneys, window sills and lintels, and east elevation bay. The bricks that make up the house themselves are artfully irregular and multi-toned as well. Standard 6: Feeling is a resource’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular time. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the resource's historic or prehistoric character. This house continues to feel like an early-twentieth century residence in a neighborhood adjacent to a major university. On an oversized corner lot, it was designed as an impressive mansion for a well-to-do Fort Collins farmer and ranchman, Leslie Horsley, and his family, and this feeling of grandeur remains. Standard 7: Association is the direct link between an important event or person and a historic or prehistoric resource. A resource retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. This property’s association with sorority and fraternity history in Fort Collins is well preserved because of its continued use by a fraternity. The house currently serves as a chapter house for Phi Kappa Tau fraternity, as it did for the Triangle Fraternity and Delta Zeta sorority before them. In addition to the house’s proximity to Colorado State 7 Jason Marmor, City of Fort Collins Architectural Property Reconnaissance Survey Form: Eastside Neighborhood Survey Project, 201 E. Elizabeth (Triangle Fraternity), Property File Collection, City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Services, Community Development and Neighborhood Services Building, Fort Collins, CO. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 25 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 University, the parking lot to the house’s east side is a modern allusion to this historic and current use. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 26 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 HISTORICAL INFORMATION Early History Frank Ralph Leslie Horsley emigrated from the United Kingdom to America in the late nineteenth century. He came from a line of men in his aristocratic, English family who had held notable governmental, clerical, and military positions. For example, Leslie’s grandfather, John Horsley, was judge for the English government in India; his great-great-uncle, Samuel Horsley, was Bishop of Worcester, Dean of Westminster, and the last bishop to wear a wig; Leslie’s father was a military general in India and one of only three in his regiment to survive the Indian Mutiny. Leslie himself was raised in Edinburgh, Scotland. He spent several years studying agriculture and honing his farming skills before coming to America. In 1892, he moved to Livermore, Colorado and bought the 400-acre Landes farm, then the Chase place, then another 160 acres, consolidating for himself an 800-acre farm and ranch. He raised large herds of cattle, including Herefords and Shorthorns. Just two years after coming to Livermore, he married Cora A. Saxton. They had three daughters: Dorothy, Francis, and Esther.8 By 1906, the Horsleys had decided to move to Fort Collins. Leslie sold his extensive farm holdings in Livermore to Major Moore, and the family moved into a house on East Laurel Street. Leslie purchased land near town to farm. In 1907, a significant natural gas flow was discovered on his farm property, sparking excitement around the possibility of using the cheap fuel for manufacturing and other commercial endeavors; however, the much-anticipated “lake” of gas was not found on the Horsley Farm. While Leslie continued his farming and ranching work nearer to his Fort Collins home, Cora Horsley became an active member of the community. She was elected secretary of the school board and was president of the South Side club, a women’s organization. Fittingly, during a 1910 debate, she argued the disadvantages of country life. 9 In 1925, Leslie and Cora Horsley purchased Lot 2 and part of Lot 3, Block 5, in the Crafts Re- Subdivision of the Lake Park Addition from Viola R. Flower. On the title, an understanding is written dictating the direction in which any house built on the lot would face depending on its situation on the lot. If the house were further west, it would face Remington Street, and if the house were further east, it would face Elizabeth Street.10 The house the Horsleys built in 1926 did 8 Portrait and Biographical Record of Denver and Vicinity, Colorado: Containing Portraits and Biographies of Many Well Known Citizens of the Past and Present, Together with Biographies and Portraits of All the Presidents of the United State (Chicago: Chapman Publishing Co., 1898), 1129; “Marriage Licenses,” Fort Collins Courier, June 7, 1894; 1910 United States Federal Census, Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2006, https://search.ancestry.com/cgi- bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&dbid=7884&h=187282960&ssrc=pt&tid=1942031&pid=6005731763&usePUB=true. 9 “Livermore,” Weekly Courier, February 28, 1906; “Today’s News,” Weekly Courier, April 11, 1906; “Today’s News,” Fort Collins Courier, May 8, 1907; “Real Estate Transfers,” Fort Collinsn Courier, May 22, 1907; “Real Estate Transfers,” Fort Collins Courier, May 29, 1907; “Natural Gas Is Discovered on Horsley Farm,” Fort Collins Courier, August 28, 1907; “Gas Prospects to Be Developed,” Fort Collins Courier, September 18, 1907; “South Side District No. 10,” Weekly Courier, May 5, 1909; “South Side Items,” Weekly Courier, August 11, 1909; “South Side District No. 10,” Weekly Courier, January 27, 1910. 10 Warranty Deed, Viola R. Flower to Leslie and Cora Horsley, September 18, 1925, Book 514, Page 101, Title Books Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 27 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 neither of those things, the front door facing northwest instead. According to the Fort Collins Express-Courier, their new $12,000 residence was considered “one of the best houses erected in Fort Collins the past year, and only another indication that the city [was] going right ahead.”11 Leslie Horsley had his brick garage built in 1926.12 The Horsleys commissioned architect Lester L. Jones to draw the plans for the house.13 L.L. Jones was one of only four architects working in Fort Collins in the early 1920s. Jones’s designs included the Armstrong Hotel in downtown Fort Collins, the Masonic Temple in Johnstown, and the Adams County Courthouse addition that nearly doubled the size of the building.14 Another notable local example of Jones’s work was his Arte Moderne design of the house at 1102 Laporte Ave., which he drew for F.L. “Roy” Toliver; this was “perhaps the only residence of this style in the city.”15 Jones started his career in Fort Collins, where he met architect Richard O. Parry, who he would partner with frequently throughout his career. By the late 1920s, Jones had moved his practice to Denver, as had Parry.16 Jones was described as an “important figure associated with the International Style in pre-war Denver,”17 by Casper Hegner, another pre-war Denver architect. Addressed originally as 1002 Remington St., this property was home to the Horsleys for many years. The family sold their house to Delta Zeta Sorority in 1945, and the Delta Zetas first occupied the house for the 1946-47 schoolyear and continued to use it as their primary chapter house through 1959. The sorority also had two “annexes” nearby this corner location, where additional members of the Delta Zetas lived: one at 202 E. Elizabeth St., directly to the north, and one at 1011 Remington St., one house down across the street.18 According to their website, the Delta Zetas were founded as a social sorority at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio in 1902. Six women founded the sorority and set it up for success, despite the challenges they faced “on a male dominated-campus, as women had just been given full status as students.”19 The sorority identifies its purpose as creating “lasting friendship” and embracing “social responsibility,” among other aims.20 11 “Leslie Horsley to Build Fine New Residence,” Fort Collins Express-Courier, November 22, 1925. 12 Building Permit #1400, 1002 Remington St., Leslie Horsley, May 13, 1926, Building Permit Collection, Fort Collins History Connection: An Online Collaboration Between the FCMoD and the PRPLD, http://history.fcgov.com/collections/building-permits. 13 Ibid. 14 Patricia Reither, “Colorado State Register of Historic Properties Nomination Form: Adams County Courthouse,” May 1, 2006, https://www.historycolorado.org/sites/default/files/media/document/2017/5AM92.pdf. 15 “Fort Collins History and Architecture: Post World War I Urban Growth, 1919-1941,” Fort Collins History Connection: An Online Collaboration between FCMoD and PRPLD, https://history.fcgov.com/contexts/post.php. 16 Reither. 17 Kiehnhoff, interview with Hegner. 18 Norma L. Anderson, interview paraphrased in Carl McWilliams, “Residential Building at 201 E. Elizabeth Street: Delta Zeta Sorority, Triangle Fraternity,” April 16, 2015, Digital Property File Collection, City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Services, Community Development and Neighborhood Services Building, Fort Collins, CO. 19 “History,” Delta Zeta Organization, http://www.deltazeta.org/about-us/history/. 20 “Our Purpose,” Delta Zeta Organization, http://www.deltazeta.org/about-us/our-purpose/. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 28 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Sororities and Fraternities Fraternities emerged on American college campuses in the early nineteenth century as the social counterpart to academically focused literary societies. The Greek-letter names of these societies were meant to evoke the prestige and distinction of learning Greek language and to represent the first letters of secret mottos, which were written in Greek. The term “sorority” was first used by Gamma Phi Beta in 1882; female Greek organizations were originally called women’s fraternities (frater means “brother” and soror means “sister” in Latin). Fraternities and sororities met regularly and hosted social events for members. By the 1890s, many Greek letter organizations began owning chapter houses where their members could live. The chapter house soon became a central component of Greek life. Between 1920 and 1929, the number of fraternity houses in the US more than doubled from 774 to 1,874. Between World War II and the 1960s, fraternity and sorority membership remained strong, and these organizations began to confront their membership policies, which could sometimes be elitist and exclusive.21 Around the time of the Vietnam War, membership in Greek organizations sank sharply because students viewed them as an “establishment idea… [that] was part of their parents’ generation,” but membership rose once more by the end of the 1970s and continues to be strong.22 At the beginning of the twentieth century, Colorado Agricultural College (Colorado State College of Agriculture and Mechanical Arts/Colorado State University), campus administration grappled with whether or not to support student participation in Greek letter societies. One of the benefits of student involvement in fraternities was that students could live in chapter houses located near campus. At the time, CAC had no student housing; the only dormitory was demolished in 1893, and others would not be built until the 1930s. Fraternities could fill that room-and-board void. Greek letter societies could also support the social development of students, while the university nurtured them academically. Conversely, the inherent exclusivity and selectivity of fraternities seemed philosophically opposed to the principles of a land-grant university.23 And inevitably, some students would be left out of the fraternities or sororities and still lack housing. Author and local historian Barbara Fleming associates Charles Lory, a university president in 1909, with the emergence of Greek letter organizations at CAC; Lory had himself belonged to a fraternity in college, and so supported their advancement.24 21 Michael A. Grandillo, “Social Fraternities and Sororities: History, Characteristics of Fraternities and Sororities, Reforms and Renewal,” Education Encyclopedia, State University, https://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2429/Social-Fraternities-Sororities.html. 22 Linda Perry, Kappa Delta President, Quoted in “There’s a Greek Success Story at CSU” by Judy Puckett, Coloradoan, September 14, 1977, CSU Fraternities and Sororities Vertical File, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO. 23 Land-grant universities were given benefits and funds by the federal government under the Morrill Acts of 1862 and 1890; the federal government gave states land specifically to establish these universities. The intention was to address some of the structural change brought on by the Industrial Revolution, so the schools established as land- grant universities focused on agriculture, engineering, and science rather than just “classical” education and liberal arts; this transformed the diversity of the classes of people who attended college. 24 Barbara Fleming, “Early Greek Life at CSU,” Coloradoan, March 29, 2015, https://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2015/03/30/early-greek-life-colorado-state-university-fort-collins/70642792/. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 29 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Fraternity and sorority membership remained strong in Fort Collins even through the Great Depression and World War II. Membership in Delta Zeta sorority, for example, more than tripled between 1948 and 1958 from 15 to 55.25 Perhaps anticipating this growth, Delta Zeta sorority purchased the mansion-like home at 1002 Remington St. from the Horsleys in 1945. In 1951, the Delta Zetas remodeled the interior of the house and also had five of the basement windows enlarged.26 The sorority sold the house to Beta Sigma of Delta Zeta Building Corporation 1957, which seems to have been a simple administrative change in title holder name (Beta Sigma was the name of the CSU chapter of Delta Zeta), and continued to use the property until 1959, when it was sold to Edmund F. Schulz, a teacher and researcher at CSU, and his wife, Violet E. Schulz. This sale included all of the rugs, mirrors, drapes, and other trappings of the house not specifically owned by individual sorority members or the house mother, according to the deed.27 Later History Schulz sold the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property to Victor W. and Elizabeth F. Sothers in 1963; in addition to using the house as a residence, Victor used it as his professional photography studio, and Elizabeth worked as the receptionist for the business.28 It was between 1966 and 1968 that the address changed from 1002 Remington St. to 201 E. Elizabeth St., according to City Directories.29 Then, in 1977, the Sotherses sold to Alexander M. “Sandy” Oskamp for $80,000. Oskamp worked in real estate. He had some of the house’s windows in the basement replaced with egress windows in 1978, and he also had the garage torn down and a parking lot put in its place in addition to some landscaping.30 In May of the same year, Oskamp received a Certificate of Occupancy for the property, officially changing it from a single family residence to a fraternity/boarding house.31 Soon after, he made an agreement with the Triangle Fraternity of Colorado State University for them to purchase the property at 201 E. Elizabeth St. on installment. The title officially transferred to them in 1982.32 25 McWilliams. 26 Building Permit #12360, 1002 Remington St., Delta Zeta Sorority, July 17, 1951, Building Permit Collection, Fort Collins History Connection: An Online Collaboration Between the FCMoD and the PRPLD, http://history.fcgov.com/collections/building-permits. 27 Warranty Deed, Beta Sigma of Delta Zeta Building Corporation to Edmund Schulz, et al., November 4, 1959, Book 1102, Page 337, Title Books Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. 28 1963-77 City Directories, City Directory Collection, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO. 29 Ibid. 30 Building Permit #60334, 201 E. Elizabeth St., Sandy Oskamp, February 16, 1978, City of Fort Collins Public Records Database, http://citydocs.fcgov.com/.; Building Permit #60892, 201 E. Elizabeth St., Sandy Oskamp, April 20, 1978, City of Fort Collins Public Records Database, http://citydocs.fcgov.com/. 31 Certificate of Occupancy, 201 E. Elizabeth St., Sandy (A.M.) Oskamp, City of Fort Collins Public Records Database, http://citydocs.fcgov.com/.http://history.fcgov.com/collections/building-permits. 32 Agreement, A.M. Oskamp, Jr. and Triangle Fraternity of Colorado State University, Inc., July 12, 1978, Larimer County Official Records Search, Larimer County, https://records.larimer.org/landmarkweb; Warranty Deed, A.M. Oskamp, Jr. to Triangle Fraternity of Colorado State University, Inc., September 15, 1982, Larimer County Official Records Search, Larimer County, https://records.larimer.org/landmarkweb. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 30 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 The Triangle Fraternity, according to their mission statement, focuses on engineering, architecture, and science.33 Like the Delta Zetas before them, the Triangle Fraternity purchased the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property at a time when membership was swinging upward. Between 1979 and 1985, their membership more than doubled from 13 to 27. The mid-eighties seem to be the peak of their membership.34 The Triangle Fraternity is still an active fraternity at CSU today. In 2006, Triangle Fraternity sold the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property to the Dennis Dowswell Living Trust for $500,000. Dowswell had planned to turn the property into a bed-and-breakfast, but that idea did not come to fruition. He instead chose to keep the property as a fraternity house rather than applying for another change of use permit.35 However, the property was not actually used as a fraternity house for a number of years under Dowswell’s ownership, creating a controversy in the neighborhood upon the 2015 sale of the property to Paul Milewski and Julie Rickett, who intended to rent the house to Phi Kappa Tau fraternity. Re-establishing the use of the property as a fraternity house required action from the City and its government boards.36 Neighborhood residents pushed back against the proposal in correspondence with the City and at public meetings, citing concerns about insufficient parking for a fraternity and noise in the neighborhood.37 With stipulations limiting occupancy and the size of fraternity meetings, Community Development and Neighborhood Services Director Laurie Kadrich approved fraternity use for 201 E. Elizabeth St. on April 15, 2015. Neighbors continued to express dissatisfaction. In the end, the issue went up to City Council for a decision. Council unanimously agreed that the house at 201 E. Elizabeth St. could be used as fraternity.38 Milewski and Rickett proceeded to rent the property to Phi Kappa Tau fraternity, an all-male Greek organization centered on “brotherhood, learning, and ethical leadership.”39 In 2017, Milewski and Rickett sold to Saddle Up Partners, LLC for $688,000, and in 2018, the property was sold to its current owner, 201 East Elizabeth Street, LLC, for $1,445,000.40 The Phi Kappa Tau fraternity still uses the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property as their chapter house. 33 Triangle Fraternity, Fraternity and Sorority Life, Colorado State University, https://fsl.colostate.edu/chapters/triangle/. 34 McWilliams. 35 Pat Ferrier, “Frat House Mired in Uncertainty,” Coloradoan, March 17, 2015. 36 Ibid., “Board Delays Hearing on Frat House,” Coloradoan, March 12, 2015. 37 Ibid., “More Scrutiny for Elizabeth Frat Plan,” Coloradoan, March 27, 2015. 38 Adrian Garcia, “Fraternity House OK’d by FoCO Council,” Coloradoan, July 21, 2015. 39 “Fraternity,” Phi Kappa Tau, https://www.phikappatau.org/about/fraternity. 40 Warranty Deed, 201 E. Elizabeth St., Paul Milewski and Julie Rickett to Saddle Up Partners, LLC, October 12, 2017, Larimer County Official Records Search, Larimer County, https://records.larimer.org/landmarkweb; Warranty Deed, 201 E. Elizabeth St., Saddle Up Partners, LLC to 201 East Elizabeth Street, LLC, December 6, 2018, Larimer County Official Records Search, Larimer County, https://records.larimer.org/landmarkweb. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 31 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION Construction Date: 1926 Architect/Builder: Lester L. Jones Building Materials: Brick, Concrete Architectural Style: Tudor Revival Description: This one-and-a-half-story Tudor-revival house is on the south-east corner of Remington Street and Elizabeth Street, within the boundaries of the Laurel School Historic District on the National Register of Historic Places. The east side of the property is filled with a parking lot that serves the home’s residents, its current use being a fraternity chapter house. It has two perpendicular gabled wings, a projecting enclosed vestibule, and a northwest-facing front porch at the juncture of the two wings that makes the house sit at an angle on the lot. The foundation is concrete, and the wall materials are brick with half-timbering in stucco in the upper half-story. The brick is textured and deliberately inconsistent in color, and this material is separated from the half- timbered section by a row of soldier-coursed bricks and a wood belt course. The roof is clad in semi-cylindrical tiles in an earth-tone. This house also has three brick chimneys. Unless otherwise noted, all window frames are painted a deep red, and all windows have a lintel of soldier-coursed bricks and a projected brick sill with headers facing out. It appears that all the windows excluding basement windows are casements, unless otherwise noted. A winding stone path leads from the north-west corner of the lot to the un-covered front porch that is flanked by two trees. The surfaces of the brick porch are topped with stone, including five steps. This porch serves the front door, which is set in a flat-roofed, brick entry projecting from the intersection of the two wings of the house. Squares are removed from the upper corners of this structure, creating the appearance of a small parapet. This upper edge is emphasized by soldier-coursed bricks. Soldier-coursed bricks are also used below the house number in the upper-middle section of this structure and for the lintel of the door. This door and its sidelights are modern, replaced sometime between 2014 and 2016, based on Google Street View imagery. The red door has one curved light in its upper section and two narrow, half-height sidelights, all of which have geometric, leaded glass patterning. There is an iron mail slot to the right of the door as well as a small, brass-colored lamp. To the left of this entry is the west side of the house’s north wing. On the first story of this elevation, there is a wood triple window with wood-framed screens. On the roof of this elevation is an inverted dormer with a pair of casement windows. To the right of this entry is the north side of the west wing. The first story of this elevation has a triple window and wood-framed screens just like its counterpart on the other north wing. On the upper level, there is a wood, paired casement window that extends just above the roofline and past the wood belt course just below the stuccoed area. There is another window of this type and orientation near the juncture with the north wing. The west elevation of the west wing has a flared roofline on the south side of its gable. There is also a brick chimney on this elevation. In the upper story, set to the left of the chimney, there is a ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 32 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 pair of wood casement windows. This elevation is dominated by a one-story, flat-roofed brick vestibule. Like the entry vestibule between the two wings, this vestibule’s roof has a parapet topped with soldier-coursed bricks. It has small sections taken out of it for drainage. The west elevation of this vestibule has a set of quintupled, wood windows with wood-framed screens that has a lintel and sill like those on the rest of the building. The north elevation of this vestibule has a wood triple window with wood-framed screens. The south elevation of this vestibule has a historic wood door with many lights flanked by 2/3 height fixed sidelights, all topped with a lintel of soldier-coursed bricks. This door is approached by a brick porch and six steps topped with stone, much like the main entrance. Because the roofline of the west wing is flared to the south, the south elevation of this wing is one-story in height and all brick. In this west-most portion of the house’s south elevation, there is a wood triple window with two of three wood-framed screens. Below this window is a modern, vinyl, basement slider window. There is also a wood paired window to the right of this triple window. The south elevation of the house features the gabled end of the north wing as well. Another chimney runs down this part of the south elevation. In the upper story, there is a wood triple window that extends just slightly into the brick portion of the wall past the wood belt course. In the lower brick portion, there are two pairs of wood casement windows, each missing one screen. There is another modern basement window on this side of the south elevation. There is no half-timbering on the east elevation. There is another chimney on this elevation that emerges at the roofline near the center of the elevation. There is a basement stairway toward the south side of this elevation that has a stone wall. Along this stairway, there is a narrow, wood, paired awning window. The door at the bottom of the stair appears historic and has a square, four-light window in its upper half. There is a light fixture attached to the ceiling of this basement entry. The ceiling of this basement entry is made of concrete and connects to a porch made of stone and topped with concrete. This porch is approached by three concrete steps. All of this concrete is painted red. This porch has a combination of posts and rails of different materials. The stair has one handrail to the right made of wood. There are some posts for the porch made of wood, but there is also a decorative metal post and partial metal balustrade. The porch posts support a wood roof covered with a cloth awning that stretches across much of the elevation’s south side. Partially beneath this awning toward the south side of the east elevation, there is a tripled, wood casement window. To its right, fully beneath the awning, is a paired, wood casement window. The right of this paired window, also beneath the awning, part of the wall is stucco and half- timbering rather than brick; soldier-coursed bricks run across this entire section. On the left side of this stuccoed section is a wood triple window with wood storms that each has three horizontal lights. On the right is a modern door, painted red like the rest of the doors on the house. To the north of this awning-covered section is a single wood casement window. To its right is a three-sided bay. Where the walls of the bay intersect, the bricks interlace only slightly, creating negative spaces in almost a checkerboard pattern. The south side of the bay has a single, wood ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 33 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 casement window with a wood-framed screen. The east side of the bay has a paired, wood casement window with one wood-framed screen. The north side of the bay has another single, wood casement window with a wood-framed screen. Also on the east elevation, there are three evenly-spaced inverted dormers, each with a pair of casement windows. There are three basement window openings on this elevation that have been filled in with masonry. There is also a small masonry feature against this elevation’s wall near the basement stairway opening that appears damaged and is of an unknown use. The north elevation features the other gabled end of the north wing. There are two basement windows on this elevation that have been replaced with modern sliders. These windows are likely less wide, but taller than the original windows, given the excavated appearance of the earth around them and the concrete around the new windows. They do, however, retain their soldier- coursed brick lintels. Above each of these basement windows is a tripled, wood casement window. The east window is shorter than the west window, but their lintels are aligned. Centered below the gable is a quadrupled, wood casement window that, like the other upper-story windows on this house, extends just slightly into the brick portion of the wall past the wood belt course. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 34 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 REFERENCE LIST or SOURCES of INFORMATION Building Permit Collection. Fort Collins History Connection: An Online Collaboration Between the FCMoD and the PRPLD. http://history.fcgov.com/collections/building-permits. CityDocs. City of Fort Collins Public Records Database. http://citydocs.fcgov.com/. City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Services Files. Property File Collection. Community Development and Neighborhood Services Building. Fort Collins, CO. Colorado Historic Newspapers Database. Fort Collins Courier Collection. Colorado State Library. https://www.coloradohistoricnewspapers.org/?a=cl&cl=CL1&e=-------en-20--1--img- txIN%7ctxCO%7ctxTA--------0--&sp=FCC. ———. Weekly Courier Collection. Colorado State Library. https://www.coloradohistoricnewspapers.org/?a=cl&cl=CL1&e=-------en-20--1--img- txIN%7ctxCO%7ctxTA--------0--&sp=TWC. ———. Fort Collins Express Collection. Colorado State Library. https://www.coloradohistoricnewspapers.org/?a=cl&cl=CL1&e=-------en-20--1--img- txIN%7ctxCO%7ctxTA--------0--&sp=FCE. Delta Zeta Organization. http://www.deltazeta.org/about-us/history/. Pat Ferrier. “Frat House Mired in Uncertainty,” Coloradoan. March 17, 2015. ———. “Board Delays Hearing on Frat House.” Coloradoan, March 12, 2015. ———. “More Scrutiny for Elizabeth Frat Plan.” Coloradoan, March 27, 2015. Fleming, Barbara. “Early Greek Life at CSU.” Coloradoan, March 29, 2015. https://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2015/03/30/early-greek-life-colorado-state- university-fort-collins/70642792/. Fort Collins History Connection: An Online Collaboration Between the FCMoD and the PRPLD. Building Permit Collection. http://history.fcgov.com/collections/building-permits. ———. “Fort Collins History and Architecture: Post World War I Urban Growth, 1919-1941.” https://history.fcgov.com/contexts/post.php. “Fraternity.” Phi Kappa Tau. https://www.phikappatau.org/about/fraternity. Garcia, Adrian. “Fraternity House OK’d by FoCO Council.” Coloradoan. July 21, 2015. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 35 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Grandillo, Michael A. “Social Fraternities and Sororities: History, Characteristics of Fraternities and Sororities, Reforms and Renewal.” Education Encyclopedia. State University. https://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2429/Social-Fraternities-Sororities.html. Kiehnhoff, Tamsen. Interview with Casper Hegner. April 10, 1990. Paraphrased in the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form for the Denver Public Library by Rodd Wheaton and Michael Paglia. June 19, 1990. Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery. Tax Assessor Card Collection. Museum of Discovery. Fort Collins, CO. ———. CSU Fraternities and Sororities Vertical File. Museum of Discovery. Fort Collins, CO. ———. City Directories Collection. Museum of Discovery. Fort Collins, CO. McWilliams, Carl. “Residential Building at 201 E. Elizabeth Street: Delta Zeta Sorority, Triangle Fraternity.” April 16, 2015. Digital Property File Collection. City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Services. Community Development and Neighborhood Services Building. Fort Collins, CO. Portrait and Biographical Record of Denver and Vicinity, Colorado: Containing Portraits and Biographies of Many Well Known Citizens of the Past and Present, Together with Biographies and Portraits of All the Presidents of the United State. Chicago: Chapman Publishing Co., 1898. Reither, Patricia. “Colorado State Register of Historic Properties Nomination Form: Adams County Courthouse.” May 1, 2006. https://www.historycolorado.org/sites/default/files/media/document/2017/5AM92.pdf. Title Books Collection. Larimer County Clerk and Recorder. Fort Collins, CO. Triangle Fraternity. Fraternity and Sorority Life. Colorado State University. https://fsl.colostate.edu/chapters/triangle/. United States Federal Census Records, Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2006, https://search.ancestry.com/cgi- bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&dbid=7884&h=187282960&ssrc=pt&tid=1942031&pid=6005731763 &usePUB=true. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 36 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 MAPS and PHOTOGRAPHS Map 1: Location Map Map 2: Aerial Map ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 37 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Map 3: 1925-43 Sanborn Map (Poudre Libraries and Proquest Collection) ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 38 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Historic Photo 1: 1948 Tax Assessor Photo Historic Photo 2: 1968 Tax Assessor Photo ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 39 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 1: Facade; Facing SE ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 40 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 2: Stone Path Close-up Photo 3: Front Porch ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 41 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 4: Front Door and Entry Vestibule Photo 5: North Wing Triple Window; Facing East ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 42 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 6: North Wing Upper Window; Facing East Photo 7: Entry Vestibule Brick Detail and West Wing Upper Window ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 43 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 8: West Wing Triple Window; Facing South Photo 9: West Wing Upper Window; Facing South ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 44 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 10: West Elevation Photo 11: West Elevation Window ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 45 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 12: West Elevation Brick Detail, Chimney, and Half-Timbering Photo 13: South Elevation ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 46 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 14: South Elevation; Door on West Vestibule Photo 15: South Elevation West Window ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 47 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 16: South Elevation 2nd West-most Window Photo 17: South Elevation East Window ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 48 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 18: South Elevation West Basement Window Photo 19: South Elevation East Basement Window ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 49 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 20: South Elevation Gable, Window, and Chimney Photo 21: East Elevation and Parking Lot ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 50 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 22: East Elevation Upper Windows and Chimney Photo 23: East Elevation South Window ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 51 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 24: East Elevation Paired Window under Awning Photo 25: East Elevation Underside of Awning ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 52 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 26: East Elevation Porch Close-up Photo 27: East Elevation Triple Window with Multi-light Storms ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 53 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 28: East Elevation Door Photo 29: East Elevation Single Window ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 54 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 30: East Elevation Bay Photo 31: East Elevation Basement Window by Stairway ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 55 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 32: East Elevation Stairway and Basement Door Photo 33: East Elevation Filled Basement Window Opening ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 56 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 34: East Elevation Masonry Feature by Stairway Photo 35: North Elevation ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 57 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 36: North Elevation Gable, Window, and Half-Timbering Photo 37: North Elevation West Window ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 58 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 38: North Elevation West Basement Window ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 59 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 60 1 Application for Fort Collins Landmark Designation – 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property Reyana Jones, Historic Preservation Specialist Landmark Preservation Commission January 15, 2020 Maps 2 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property 1925-43 Sanborn Map (Poudre Libraries/Proquest) ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 61 Historic Photos and Context 3 1948 Tax Assessor Photo (Local History Archive 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property Armstrong Hotel, Designed by Lester L. Jones (Local History Archive) Standard 1: Events 4 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property Above and Right: From the 1950 Silver Spruce yearbook Triangle Fraternity Crest Phi Kappa Tau Crest ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 62 Standard 3: Design/Construction 5 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property 1968 Tax Assessor Photo (Local History Archive) Northwest Elevation 6 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 63 Northwest Elevation 7 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property North Wing Window; Facing East West Wing Upper Window; Facing South West Elevation 8 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 64 South Elevation 9 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property South Elevation 10 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 65 East Elevation 11 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property East Elevation 12 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 66 East Elevation 13 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property East Elevation 14 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 67 North Elevation 15 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property • Construction: 1926 • Standard 1: Events • Association with university sorority and fraternity history • Standard 3: Design/Construction • Tudor Revival Style, Architect Lester L. Jones • Exterior Integrity: Location, Design, Setting, Materials, Workmanship, Feeling, and Association 16 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 68 Role of the Landmark Preservation Commission Determine whether criteria are satisfied: (1) The proposed resource is eligible for designation (1) Significance (2) Integrity (2) The requested designation will advance the policies and the purposes in a manner and extent sufficient to justify the requested designation Adopt a motion making a recommendation to Council 17 18 Application for Fort Collins Landmark Designation – 201 E. Elizabeth St. – Horsley/Delta Zeta Property Reyana Jones, Historic Preservation Specialist Landmark Preservation Commission January 15, 2020 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 69 Garfield St Mathews St E Elizabeth St Remington St 201 E. Elizabeth St. © 1 inch = 113 feet Site ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 70 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 1 STAFF REPORT January 15, 2020 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME THE BROWN-GOODING PROPERTY AT 425 MATHEWS STREET - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION STAFF Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION APPLICANT: Sarah Breseke and Wouter Montfrooij PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council for landmark designation of the Brown-Gooding Property at 425 Mathews Street. COMMISSION’S ROLE AND ACTION: One of the Commission’s responsibilities is to provide a recommendation to City Council on applications for the designation of a property as a Fort Collins Landmark. Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code provides the standards and process for designation. At the hearing, the Commission shall determine whether the following two (2) criteria are satisfied: (1) the proposed resource is eligible for designation; and (2) the requested designation will advance the policies and the purposes in a manner and extent sufficient to justify the requested designation. Following its review, and once the Commission feels it has the information it needs, the Commission should adopt a motion providing its recommendation on the property’s Landmark eligibility to City Council. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has determined that the Brown-Gooding Property and its accompanying garage are eligible for Fort Collins Landmark designation. The Brown-Gooding Property has significance under Standard 3 (Design/Construction), as a significant example of Free Classic Queen Anne architecture, and as a significant work of master builder Herman Schroeder. The property retains all seven aspects of integrity. Staff recommends that the Landmark Preservation Commission approval a motion to Council recommending landmark designation. STAFF EVALUATION OF REVIEW CRITERIA STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE and EXTERIOR INTEGRITY Staff has determined that the Brown-Gooding Property is eligible under Standard 3. Standards of Significance: Significance is the importance of a site, structure, object or district to the history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture of our community, State or Nation. For designation as Fort Collins Landmarks or Fort Collins Landmark Districts properties must meet one (1) or more of the following standards: Packet Pg. 71 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 2 Standard 1: Events The resource is associated with events that have made a recognizable contribution to the broad patterns of the history of the community, State or Nation. A resource can be associated with either or both of two (2) types of events: * A specific event marking an important moment in Fort Collins prehistory or history; and/or * A pattern of events or a historic trend that made a recognizable contribution to the development of the community, State or Nation. N/A Standard 2: Persons/ Groups The resource is associated with the lives of persons or groups of persons recognizable in the history of the community, State or Nation whose specific contributions to that history can be identified and documented. N/A Standard 3: Design/ Construction The resource embodies the identifiable characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; represents the work of a craftsman or architect whose work is distinguishable from others by its characteristic style and quality; possesses high artistic values or design concepts; or is part of a recognizable and distinguishable group of resources. The resource may be significant not only for the way it was originally constructed or crafted, but also for the way it was adapted at a later period, or for the way it illustrates changing tastes, attitudes, and/or uses over time. The Brown-Gooding Property is an excellent example of brick “Free Classic” Queen Anne architecture in Fort Collins, featuring a prominent curved front porch with a central, Classically-styled dormer above. The home is also among the most prominent surviving examples of the work of master craftsman Herman Schroeder, a significant builder and carpenter who arrived in Fort Collins in 1878 and constructed or worked on buildings of all types, most in downtown or to its south and east. Late-Victorian styling, red brick walls, and ornate wood detailing especially on porches, were indicative of Schroeder’s work in the community. The property at 425 Mathews is among the most significant and best preserved of his residential projects. YES Standard 4: Information potential The resource has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. N/A Packet Pg. 72 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 3 Standards of Integrity Integrity is the ability of a site, structure, object or district to be able to convey its significance. The integrity of a resource is based on the degree to which it retains all or some of seven (7) aspects or qualities established by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. All seven qualities do not need to be present for a site, structure, object or district to be eligible as long as the overall sense of past time and place is evident. Standard 1: Location Location is the place where the resource was constructed or the place where the historic or prehistoric event occurred. The home has not been moved since its initial construction. YES Standard 2: Design Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan space, structure and style of a resource. The property retains strong integrity of overall design, including its red brick exterior, Classical features such as the rounded porch with Doric columns and the gable end, Victorian-style flared eaves. YES Standard 3: Setting Setting is the physical environment of a resource. Setting refers to the character of the place; it involves how, not just where, the resource is situated and its relationship to the surrounding features and open space. The property retains strong integrity of setting in a residential area southeast of downtown Fort Collins. Historic landscape elements such as mature tree cover, a setback from the street, and a generally residential landscape surrounding the building are retained. Most of the homes built around 425 Mathews in the early 1900s remain and retain good integrity themselves. The primary loss of integrity to the historic setting have been related to redevelopment of the Mulberry Avenue corridor. The road is now a primary arterial, adding road noise to what was once a quieter residential street, and leading to the demolition of the frame E.J. Gregory House, another Schroeder building that neighbored the property to the south at 429 Mathews. It was replaced by the current commercial building in 1977. YES Standard 4: Materials Materials are the physical elements that form a resource. The property retains excellent integrity of materials. The historic stone and brick masonry is retained and in generally good condition, as well as the historic wood windows and wood front porch. While the original wood shingle roof has since been replaced with various iterations of asphalt, the building’s exterior, and that of its garage in the rear, appear generally unaltered. YES Packet Pg. 73 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 4 Standard 5: Workmanship Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. It is the evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering a building, structure or site. The property retains strong integrity of workmanship, especially to Herman Schroeder’s building technique. The combination of detailed carpentry adorning simple masonry is intact, and the detailing of wood porch pillars and the curved porch roof and footprint is retained, all character-defining aspects of Schroeder’s work. YES Standard 6: Feeling Feeling is a resource’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period or time. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the resource's historic or prehistoric character. The property has strong integrity of historic feeling. Aside from modest changes to the integrity of setting, the property’s overall character retains the sense of the building as an early-twentieth century residence in a neighborhood adjacent to a commercial downtown. YES Standard 7: Association Association is the direct link between an important event or person and a historic or prehistoric resource. A resource retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. The property has strong integrity of association due to its strong integrity of design, workmanship, and materials. Primarily significant as an indicative work of Herman Schroeder, his craftsmanship is still evident and easily recognizable, making the connection between the building’s current condition and its construction in 1903 apparent. YES ALIGNMENT WITH CITY CODE AND PURPOSE The designation of historic properties and the work of historic preservation promote the policies and purposes adopted by City Council for the City of Fort Collins. Designation furthers the City’s goals of environmental, economic, and social sustainability. By continuing the use of an existing building and preserving the embodied energy of its existing materials, landmark designation is environmentally sustainable. The designation of historic properties also contributes to the City’s economic standing directly, through property, use, and sales taxes and revenues, and indirectly, through the promotion of heritage tourism. Furthermore, historic designation encourages the continuation of private property ownership. The City’s cultural standing is also upheld because the preservation of the built environment helps residents and visitors tangibly gain a better understanding of our history and the diversity of people who shaped Fort Collins. Landmark designation enhances and perpetuates significant resources in the City through the protection and acknowledgement of those historic properties as well as through the financial incentives offered to landmark owners. Finally, the designation of historic properties also maintains and enhances the City’s aesthetics through the protection and recognition of significant local architecture and history, contributing to the promotion of good urban design and fostering civic pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past. Taken together, these benefits of landmark designation help strengthen Fort Collins’s community and support our vision of a livable, sustainable city. (Municipal Code 14-1 and 14-2; City Plan) The designation of the Brown-Gooding Property at 425 Mathews would align with several aspects of the City’s Packet Pg. 74 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 5 Municipal Code and guiding policies. As a significant example of local architecture and craftsmanship, protection of the property aligns with Municipal Code 14-2, specifically that the property is an important element of the City’s cultural, artistic, and architectural heritage and will help foster civic pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past. The property remains a private residence, aligning with 14-2(g) to “promote and encourage continued private ownership and utilization of such sites….” The recognition of the home and leveraging of preservation-based incentives as part of the owners’ rehabilitation project aligns with both the Municipal Code and City Plan Policy LIV 2.1 for the Revitalization of underutilized properties, specifically as an adaptive reuse. Designation is also consistent with Policies LIV 10.1, 10.2, 10.4, 10.6, to identify, preserve, utilize incentives for, and designate historic resources throughout the city, respectively. FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION FINDINGS OF FACT: In evaluating the request for a recommendation to City Council regarding landmark designation for the Brown- Gooding Property, staff makes the following findings of fact: 1. That all owners of the Brown-Gooding Property have consented in writing to this request for Fort Collins Landmark designation of the property; 2. That the Brown-Gooding Property has significance to Fort Collins under Significance Standard 3, Design/Construction, as supported by the analysis provided in this staff report; 3. That the Brown-Gooding Property has integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association to convey their significance as supported by the analysis provided in this staff report; 4. That the designation will advance the policies and purposes stated in the code in a manner and extent sufficient to justify the requested designation, as supported by the analysis provided in this staff report. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission adopt a motion to Council recommending the landmark designation of the Brown-Gooding Property. SAMPLE MOTIONS SAMPLE MOTION FOR APPROVAL: I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend that City Council adopt an ordinance to designate the Brown-Gooding Property at 425 Mathews, as a Fort Collins Landmark, finding that this property is eligible for its significance to Fort Collins under Standard 3, design/construction, as supported by the analysis provided in the staff report dated January 15, 2019, and that the property clearly conveys this significance through all seven aspects of integrity; and finding also that the designation of this property will promote the policies and purposes of the City as specified in Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code. SAMPLE MOTION FOR DENIAL: I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend that City Council does not adopt an ordinance to designate the Brown-Gooding Property at 425 Mathews, as a Fort Collins Landmark, finding that this property is not eligible because of a lack of significance or the failure of the property to convey its significance through its integrity, and/or finding that the designation of this property will not promote the policies and purposes of the City as specified in Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Landmark Designation Application 3. Staff Presentation Packet Pg. 75 SMITH ST S MASON ST MATHEWS ST PETERSON ST WHEDBEE ST S COLLEGE AVE S HOWES ST E PLUM ST E OLIVE ST LOCUST ST E OAK ST E LAUREL ST REMINGTON ST E MYRTLE ST E MAGNOLIA ST E MULBERRY ST W OLIVE ST W OAK ST RIVERSIDE AVE W LAUREL ST LAPORTE AVE W MYRTLE ST WALNUT ST E MOUNTAIN AVE OVAL DR W MAGNOLIA ST W MULBERRY ST W MOUNTAIN AVE JEFFERSON ST N MASON ST N HOWES ST MONTEZUMA FULLER ALY OLD MAIN DR E LINCOLN AVE LILAC LN LINDEN ST N COLLEGE AVE WILLOW ST DALZELL ALY OLD FIREHOUSE ALY LINCOLN AVE TENNEY CT CANYON AVE OLD TOWN SQ REMBRANDT DR REIDHEAD ALY REMINGTON ST TENNEY CT 425 Mathews Location Map Printed: December 31, 2019 Legend 425 Mathews Historic District Type Local National Register 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 Miles Scale 1:5,000 © Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Fort Collins Landmark Designation LOCATION INFORMATION Address: 425 Mathews Street Legal Description: Block 134, Lot 2 of the 1873 Fort Collins Plat Property Name (historic and/or common): Brown-Gooding Property OWNER INFORMATION Name: Sarah Breseke & Wouter Montfrooij Company/Organization (if applicable): N/A Phone: 573-639-0112 Email: montfrooijw@missouri.edu, sbreseke@gmail.com Mailing Address: 425 Mathews St, Fort Collins, CO, 80524 CLASSIFICATION Category Ownership Status Present Use Existing Designation Building Public Occupied Commercial Nat’l Register Structure Private Unoccupied Educational State Register Site Religious Object Residential District Entertainment Government Other  FORM PREPARED BY Name and Title: Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner Address: 281 N. College Ave Phone: 970-416-4250 Email: jbertolini@fcgov.com Relationship to Owner: Staff – Historic Preservation Services Division DATE: December 31, 2019 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 77 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 TYPE OF DESIGNATION and BOUNDARIES Individual Landmark Property Landmark District Explanation of Boundaries: The boundaries of the property being designated as a Fort Collins Landmark correspond to the legal description of the property, above. The property (hereinafter the “Property”) consists of the historic residential building (1903), its historic-age garage off the rear alley (c.1912), and the surrounding landscape, currently encompassed by parcel no. 9712331002. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE and INTEGRITY Properties are eligible for designation if they possess both significance and integrity. Significance is the importance of a site, structure, object or district to the history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture of our community, State or Nation. For designation as Fort Collins Landmarks or Fort Collins Landmark Districts properties must meet one (1) or more of the following standards set forth in Fort Collins Municipal Code Section 14-22(a): Standard 1: Events This property is associated with events that have made a recognizable contribution to the broad patterns of the history of the community, State or Nation. It is associated with either (or both) of these two (2) types of events: a) A specific event marking an important moment in Fort Collins prehistory or history; and/or b) A pattern of events or a historic trend that made a recognizable contribution to the development of the community, State or Nation. N/A Standard 2: Persons/Groups This property is associated with the lives of persons or groups of persons recognizable in the history of the community, State or Nation whose specific contributions to that history can be identified and documented. N/A Standard 3: Design/Construction This property embodies the identifiable characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; represents the work of a craftsman or architect whose work is distinguishable from others by its characteristic style and quality; possesses high artistic values or design concepts; or is part of a recognizable and distinguishable group of properties. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 78 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 The Brown-Gooding Property is an excellent example of brick “Free Classic” Queen Anne architecture in Fort Collins, featuring a prominent curved front porch with a central, Classically-styled dormer above and Doric porch columns. The home is also among the most prominent surviving examples of the work of master craftsman Herman Schroeder, a significant builder and carpenter who arrived in Fort Collins in 1878 and constructed or worked on buildings of all types, most in downtown or to its south and east. Late- Victorian styling, red brick walls, and ornate wood detailing especially on porches, were indicative of Schroeder’s work in the community. The property at 425 Mathews is among the most significant and best preserved of his residential projects. Standard 4: Information Potential This property has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. N/A Integrity is the ability of a site, structure, object or district to be able to convey its significance. The integrity of a resource is based on the degree to which it retains all or some of seven (7) aspects or qualities set forth in Fort Collins Municipal Code Section 14-22(b): location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. All seven qualities do not need to be present for a site, structure, object or district to be eligible as long as the overall sense of past time and place is evident. Standard 1: Location is the place where the resource was constructed or the place where the historic or prehistoric event occurred. The home has not been moved since its initial construction. Standard 2: Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan space, structure and style of a resource. The property retains strong integrity of overall design, including its red brick exterior, Classical features such as the rounded porch with Doric columns and the gable end, Victorian-style flared eaves. Standard 3: Setting is the physical environment of a resource. Setting refers to the character of the place; it involves how, not just where, the resource is situated and its relationship to the surrounding features and open space. The property retains strong integrity of setting in a residential area southeast of downtown Fort Collins. Historic landscape elements such as mature tree cover, a setback from the street, and a generally residential landscape surrounding the building are retained. Most of the homes built around 425 Mathews in the early 1900s remain and retain good integrity themselves. The primary loss of integrity to the historic setting have been related to redevelopment of the Mulberry Avenue corridor. The road is now a primary arterial, adding road noise to what was once a quieter residential street, and leading to the demolition of the frame E.J. Gregory House, another Schroeder building ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 79 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 that neighbored the property to the south at 429 Mathews. It was replaced by the current commercial building in 1977. Standard 4: Materials are the physical elements that form a resource. The property retains excellent integrity of materials. The historic stone and brick masonry is retained and in generally good condition, as well as the historic wood windows and wood front porch. While the original wood shingle roof has since been replaced with various iterations of asphalt, the building’s exterior, and that of its garage in the rear, appear generally unaltered. Standard 5: Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. It is the evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering a building, structure or site. The property retains strong integrity of workmanship, especially to Herman Schroeder’s building technique. The combination of detailed carpentry adorning simple masonry is intact, and the detailing of wood porch pillars and the curved porch roof and footprint is retained, all character-defining aspects of Schroeder’s work. Standard 6: Feeling is a resource’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular time. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the resource's historic or prehistoric character. The property has strong integrity of historic feeling. Aside from modest changes to the integrity of setting, the property’s overall character retains the sense of the building as an early-twentieth century residence in a neighborhood adjacent to a commercial downtown. Standard 7: Association is the direct link between an important event or person and a historic or prehistoric resource. A resource retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. The property has strong integrity of association due to its strong integrity of design, workmanship, and materials. Primarily significant as an indicative work of Herman Schroeder, his craftsmanship is still evident and easily recognizable, making the connection between the building’s current condition and its construction in 1903 apparent. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 80 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 HISTORICAL INFORMATION Herman W. Schroeder constructed the Brown-Gooding House in 1903 for Clyde H. and Addie Brown. Clyde Brown was one of three sons of early Fort Collins resident James A. Brown who arrived in 1868 and worked as a wagonmaker, farmer, and cattle rancher. The vacant property on which 425 Mathews would be built changed hands several times over the late-1800s as part of the land speculation typical of the period. In 1902, James Brown appears to have purchased the property and transferred it to his son the following year to allow for the construction of the current home. The period of significance for the property is 1903, although the c.1912 carriage house is also a contributing element as an unusual example of a common addition to the back yards and rear alleys of buildings throughout the neighborhood.1 The home stands as a strong example of Free Classic Queen Anne architecture in Fort Collins. The Queen Anne style was part of the assortment of house styles common in the late-Victorian era in the 1870s through the 1900s. It was defined by asymmetrical massing, varied textures, and on higher-style examples, intricate detailing in carpentry, shingles, and brickwork. Among the more common variations of the Queen Ann, especially in the 1890s and 1900s, was the Free Classic. A precursor to the more formal Classical Revival buildings that would become popular in the 1900s- 1920s, the Free Classic Queen Ann and added certain Classical features to it, often in a front or wrap-around porch. While these homes retained their asymmetrical massing and other Queen Anne features, they adopted modest Classical detailing as well, specifically Classical columns on the porch, dentil molding along the eaves, and sometimes prominent stone sills and lintels. The property at 425 Mathews is an extremely well-preserved example of this style in Fort Collins, exhibiting a rare, rounded front porch along with the other defining features of this style. It stands as an excellent example of a period home built for a middle class Fort Collins family. Clyde was a graduate of Fort Collins High School and attended Colorado State Agricultural College (now Colorado State University). He was a partner in the Mathews and Brown meat cutting and packing firm in the Miller Block on Linden Street (southwest corner of Linden & Walnut). Clyde and Addie lived in this residence until 1909 when they moved to Laramie, Wyoming for several years. In 1912, they returned to Fort Collins but took up residence at 1220 W. Mountain before moving to a home at 526 S. Howes, a brick Victorian-style residence that remains on that location. Brown worked for the Great Western Sugar Company and maintained a cattle ranching operation, the Brown Acres Ranch, in Poudre Canyon for many years and was a member of the Indian Relic Hobby Club. Among the organization’s first projects was utilizing the Works Progress Administration to relocate the Antoine Janus cabin from Laporte to Fort Collins Later in 1941, Clyde Brown became the first curator of the Fort Collins Museum built in northeast Lincoln Park 1 Ansel Watrous, History of Larimer County, Colorado, (Fort Collins, CO: The Courier Printing & Publishing Company, 1911), p367; 425 Mathews, research and survey folder (including title search), Historic Preservation Services, Community Development & Neighborhood Services, City of Fort Collins (hereafter, HPS-CDNS), 281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO; “Fort Collins, Colorado,” Sanborn Fire Insurance Company, 1901, 1906, 1909, 1917, Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/collections/sanborn-maps/?q=fort+collins+colorado, accessed December 23, 2019; Fort Collins City Directory, 1903, 425 Mathews, HPS-CDNS; from Fort Collins History Connection, Fort Collins Museum of Discovery (hereafter FCMOD), https://history.fcgov.com/, accessed December 24, 2019. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 81 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 (now Library Park, roughly in the location of the current public library), serving in that position until 1960. The institution that Brown helped found eventually relocated to the former Fort Collins Library building on the west side of Library Park before recently relocating to North College Avenue and rebranding as the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery.2 Mr. Brown is a notable figure in Fort Collins’ social and educational history and intact properties related to his significance work in Fort Collins would likely be eligible for Landmark designation under Standard 2. However, the 425 Mathews property is not appropriately related to his importance to Fort Collins history to qualify under that criteria. The property best associated with that significance, the Fort Collins Museum building (1940), was demolished to make way for the Fort Collins Public Library, built in 1976. The next most appropriate property is the residence where the Brown family spent the majority of their time in Fort Collins, including while Clyde Brown worked as curator, which is at 506 S. Howes. The home at that address has strong historic integrity and may be eligible for Landmark designation.3 The Work of Herman W. Schroeder Herman W. Schroeder, the builder of 425 Mathews, was among Fort Collins’ most prominent residential builders during Fort Collins’ early development booms in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. Schroeder was born in 1855 on Doty Island in Wisconsin and moved to Fort Collins in 1878. Prior to the move, he had trained as a carpenter and joiner, which became his livelihood after the move. Schroeder’s most prominent buildings are often recognizable as he tended to construct late-Victorian style masonry buildings with multiple gables, prominent stylistic carpentry such as rounded porches, flared eaves, verge-boards, and decorative shingling in gable ends.4 The Fort Collins Courier and building permit records from the early 1900s provide several detailed snapshots of Schroeder’s building career in Fort Collins. Although he completed some commercial and institutional projects, such as lumber yard warehouses and the Fort Collins Hospital at 300 Mathews, he was most accomplished for residential construction in the neighborhoods south and east of downtown. Many of his projects in and near the commercial downtown have since been demolished or redeveloped, while most of his intact work is generally within the Laurel School Historic District. Between 1884 and 1925, Schroeder appears frequently as the builder for homes throughout the neighborhood, sometimes working with architects on larger projects for wealthier families, sometimes designing homes himself. He was also elected the City’s first building inspector under a new ordinance passed in early 1907 to enforce basic building and fire codes.5 2 Fort Collins City Directory, 1909-1910, FCMOD. 3 Larimer County City Directory, 1913-1914, p18, and 1917, p30, and Fort Collins City Directory, 1940, p13, FCMOD. 4 Watrous, 418-419. 5 Fort Collins Courier, March 27, 1907, p4, through Colorado Historic Newspapers Collection, https://www.coloradohistoricnewspapers.org/, accessed December 23, 2019. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 82 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Of the documented Herman Schroeder projects in Fort Collins, most are late Victorian in style, usually brick Queen Anne-style cottages with Classical features incorporated into prominent front porches, sometimes added after construction. However, as a carpenter and joiner, some of Schroeder’s projects include frame cottages, although with similar design and features. Later in his career, by the 1920s, Schroeder completed a few projects in the contemporary Arts-and- Crafts styles. Below is a list of surviving buildings attributed to Mr. Schroeder that are good reflections of his work (Note: other surviving examples meeting this criteria may still survive, but may not have been confirmed as Schroeder buildings at the time of this nomination): Known Projects of Herman W. Schroeder, Builder6 Date Project Name Location & Details Type of work 1893 Frank Avery House addition Builder & carpentry 1900 421 Mathews 421 Mathews, 6-room cottage adjoining Schroeder’s own building Builder/owner 1900 608 Remington Builder 1902 Schroeder Residence 419 S. Mathews, 6-room brick cottage (Landmarked) Builder (owner & resident) 1902 S.B. Purdy residence 216 Remington, 6-room brick home (curved porch) Builder 1902 John C. Thompson residence 602 S. Peterson, 5-room brick home Builder 1903 Schroeder House – porch addition 419 Mathews, Addition to Schroeder’s personal residence Builder (owner & resident) 1903 Brown House (this property) 425 Mathews Builder 1903 Nelson House 313 E. Magnolia Builder 1904 Sperr House 633 Mathews; rounded porch Builder 1905 Mrs. Joseph Murray residence 629 S. Howes, 8-room brick Builder (w/ Lunn) 6 Fort Collins Courier, “Local News,”, August 7, 1884, p5, and “Some Good Houses,” August 31, 1893, p1, November 11, 1897, p1, and July 14, 1898, p1, and The Weekly Courier, “City and Country,” September 28, 1899, p3, and “Opens Well,” February 8, 1900, p6, and “Fort Collins’ Splendid Building Record,” January 2, 1902, p3, and “A Handsome Home,” November 12, 1902, p7, and January 14, 1903, and “New Homes for New People,” January 4, 1905, p1, and January 11, 1905, p6, and “City and Country,” January 18, 1905, p6, and November 29, 1905, p7, and December 27, 1905, p1, and “Fort Collins’ Handsome and Well Equipped Hospital,” November 21, 1906, p7, through Colorado Historic Newspapers Collection, https://www.coloradohistoricnewspapers.org/, accessed December 23, 2019; Building permit records, FCMOD, accessed December 24, 2019. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 83 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Known Projects of Herman W. Schroeder, Builder6 Date Project Name Location & Details Type of work 1905 Joseph Kahn residence corner of Matthews and Myrtle, brick (unsure of which building; all 4 are brick in 1906) Builder 1905 James B. Arthur estate 328-334 E. Mulberry, 8- room residence Builder, Albert Bryan (architect) 1906 Fort Collins Hospital 301 E. Magnolia Builder 1920 1-story Craftsman 701 Mathews Builder 1925 2-story Craftsman 730 Mathews Builder Residents of 425 Mathews Despite the significance of Clyde and Addie Brown to Fort Collins’ social and business history, their time at 425 Mathews was short-lived. In 1909, the Browns departed for Wyoming but retained ownership of the home, renting it to Harry W. and Grace Hooper. Harry Hooper was a superintendent at the Great Western Sugar Company plant northeast of the city. However, in 1913, the Hoopers left and the Browns sold the property to Dr. Bert A. Gooding and his wife May. Dr. Gooding operated a medical practice out of the home for several years, later moving his practice to the Physicians Building at 125-127 S. College Avenue along with six other medical professionals. Gooding practiced medicine in Fort Collins for 17 years until his death in October 1923 of a brain hemorrhage caused by apoplexy. During that time, Gooding was involved with several organizations in the community, including the board that pushed for the Poudre canyon road that became Colorado Route 14.7 Based on available research, while Gooding appears to have been involved in many facets of Fort Collins’ development and public life in the 1910s and 1920s, he does not appear to rise to the level needed to recognize the home for his contributions. As a medical professional, he was one of several working in Fort Collins at the time, and he managed much of his day-to-day practice either at the Fort Collins Hospital at 301 E. Magnolia Street or the Physician’s Building at 127 S. College Avenue. Further research into Gooding’s contributions to social organizations and recreational tourism may change this assertion. The Gooding family retained the home for many years after, passing it to Edna (Gooding) O’Neill and her husband Frank in 1925. It appears that the estate fell into financial trouble as in 1925, Edna O’Neill established a Deed of Trust with Christine Jensen, who eventually filed a suit in 1932 for the sum of $2,562.05, presumably a lien as a result of a loan Ms. Jensen had provided to the O’Niells. The following year, the property was listed as vacant, but Ms. Jensen purchased the property through public auction as her residence, later selling it to Mabel F. Smith in 1937, the 7 Larimer County Directory, 1913-1914, 1917, 1919, FCMOD; “Dr. Bert A. Gooding Dies Thursday from Apoplexy,” Fort Collins Coloradoan, October 11, 1923, p1, from www.coloradoan.com, accessed December 24, 2019. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 84 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 latter being a widow of Lester Smith who had served in the U.S. Air Force, in 1937. Smith appears to have either rented the property or taken on boarders, as several other occupants appear in city directories during that time. In 1940, Raymond E. Dunlap, a truck driver for Poudre Valley Bottling Works resided at the house. In 1962, Mabel Smith sold the property to Dorothy Sess, although she continued to reside at the property along with other boarders until her death in 1971. In 1962, a student named Donald Atkinson resided at the address with Ms. Smith. Ms. Sess held the property until 1976 before selling it to Scavo-Doughterty Building, Inc.. During that time, Ms. Sess also appears to have rented the property. That company, which is currently housed in the office building just south of 425 Mathews, held the property as a rental under varying names including T J Investments until Sarah Breseke and Wouter Montfrooij purchased it in 2019.8 ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION Construction Date: 1903 Architect/Builder: Herman W. Schroeder Building Materials: Wood, brick, stone, concrete Architectural Style: Queen Anne (Free Classic) Description: Constructed in 1903 by Herman W. Schroeder, the building is a roughly rectangular brick, Free Classic Queen Anne style residence of one-and-one-half stories. The building has a hipped, asphalt composition shingle roof with flared, boxed eaves and a frieze with simple detailing and decorative dentil molding. The walls are red brick laid in a running bond (suggesting spacing and metal ties between the wythes to provide stability). The building sits on a rough square-cut, ashlar stone foundation. It has three dormers, including a central front gable dormer with a double-pitch gable roof, and two side dormers with hipped roofs, flared eaves, and single-sash windows. It has a prominent, rounded wood porch with matching eaves and dentil molding, solid wood panel half walls, and eight Doric columns bracing the round roof. All windows are wood of varying configurations, most of which have rough-cut stone lintels and sills. The façade of the building faces east onto Mathews Street and contains both a prominent, double-pitch, Classical-style dormer as well as the prominent, rounded porch. The porch includes Classical detailing to match the rest of the house at the eave line, as well as four Doric columns on either side of the central entry and stoop. The porch has wood tongue-and-groove decking and beadboard ceilings. The central wood panel door is centered in a projected entry hall that extends from the wall plane by approximately six feet. The door has a vertical three-light configuration with long, single-light sidelights flanking on either side. On either side of the east entry, on the north and south walls of the projection are long one- over-one wood sash windows with rough cut stone lintels and sills. Flanking the projection on either side are large cottage-style wood windows. Along the porch half-wall, there is simple wood paneling. Below the deck, flat wood boards cover the porch foundation, which consists of pilings over a poured concrete perimeter wall foundation. A slab stone walkway extends from the sidewalk, including two steps to 8 425 Mathews, research and survey folder (including title search), HPS-CDNS; Larimer County Directory, 1925, 1929, 1931, 1933, 1936, 1938, and Fort Collins City Directory, 1940, 1948, 1950, 1957, 1960, 1962, 1963, 1966, 1969, FCMOD; “Real Estate Transfers,” April 22, 1962, p4, and “Obituaries – Mabel Smith,” March 5, 1971, p3, Fort Collins Coloradoan. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 85 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 meet the rise from sidewalk to stoop. The porch has a concrete three-stair stoop with modern metal railings. There is a brick chimney covered in concrete stucco on the roof slope. The north elevation is fairly simple, broken by a pair of wood sash one-over-one windows near the front (northeast) corner, along with a single matching window toward the rear, both with rough-cut stone lintels and sills. Near the center of the elevation interrupting the stone foundation is a wood basement window with an arched brick lintel, but it is boarded over. Breaking the roof above the eave is a small hipped-roof dormer with flared eaves, wood shingle siding, and dentil molding matching the rest of the house. The dormer has a small cottage-style window on its northern face. The south elevation includes a dormer matching that on the north elevation. It has a rounded bay window with three wood, one-over-one sash windows matching those elsewhere on the house. Along the foundation of the bay, three small wood windows interrupt the foundation, but are currently boarded over. The roof remains flat over the bay. Farther west along the wall is a single, shorter one- over-one wood sash window. Near the rear (southwest) corner is a paired window of matching the others on the house. There is an entrance into the basement, with a concrete block wall with concrete stucco extending several feet away from the house wall in an ell configuration to shelter the staircase. The rear (west) elevation facing the alley is defined by a gable dormer breaking the eave-line with a large, cottage-style wood window on the upper floor. On the first floor, two one-over-one wood sash windows of different sizes break the wall plane, with matching stone lintels and sills. Near the elevation’s southwest corner is a frame mud porch on a poured concrete foundation, likely added after the construction of the home by 1906 (the addition appears on a Sanborn insurance map from that year).9 The mud porch has a hipped roof and corrugated metal siding. It has a simple panel door with large single-light on its west elevation, with a three-step concrete stoop. Windows in the mud room addition are all wood two-by-two casements, with a set of two on the addition’s south elevation, and a set of three on the west elevation. Just north of the addition is a coal chute faced with rough-cut stone. There is a red brick chimney on the main roof slope above the addition. At the rear of the lot along the alley is a two-bay, single-story carriage house constructed c.1912 by the Gooding family.10 It has concrete walls, a hipped roof with exposed rafters, and large, vertical board swinging carriage doors. Both doors included a fixed, wood, two-by-three window but both have been boarded over. There is a large poured concrete pad in front of the doors, and no windows on other elevations. A different set of frame sheds appears on the property on the 1906 Sanborn but they were demolished and replaced with the carriage house by 1917. Carriage houses like these were common additions during the 1910s and 1920s for middle class families that could afford automobiles. In most cases, like this one, the carriage house or garage was constructed at the rear of the lot to provide alley access, and was comparatively small, housing only 1-2 vehicles. While occasionally, garages had stylistic connections to the primary residence, in most cases they were simple frame or masonry structures that 9 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company, “Fort Collins,” 1906, p12, through the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/collections/sanborn-maps/?q=fort+collins+colorado, accessed December 23, 2019. 10 Survey records suggest c.1912 construction but the first primary source to mention the carriage house is the 1917 Sanborn for the area, which shows the carriage house with concrete construction and wood doors. Sanborn Fire Insurance Company, 1917, p15. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 86 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 were constructed for economy rather than aesthetic value. The garage at 425 Mathews is a contributing accessory structure to the primary historic property. The setting surrounding the residence at 425 Mathews reflects the evolution of this residential neighborhood since its initial construction in the 1890s and 1900s. On the property itself, an old-growth elm (Ulmus sp.) rests in the front yard while a tall Rocky Mountain Juniper (Juniperus scopulorum) sits near the northwest corner of the main house. Mathews Street is lined with mature trees, mostly elms with some cottonwoods (Populus deltoides), with regular setbacks for buildings and mostly planted grass comprising front and rear lawns. Some redevelopment has taken place in the neighborhood due to its proximity to Mulberry Street, an arterial road, directly to the south. The E.J. Gregory House, another Herman Schroeder-constructed building at 429 Mathews, was demolished in the 1970s to make way for the current office building that fronts Mulberry Street, constructed in 1977.11 List of Alterations to Building12 x c.1906 – construction of mud room onto rear of house x c.1912 – Construction of concrete garage x 1927 – Painting wood trim and other features (Cleland Bull, contractor)13 x 1937 – Work on “archways.”14 x 1948 – Reshingled roof.15 x 1954 – Replacement of roof with rolled asphalt.16 x Unknown dates – addition of stucco to some masonry features, including basement stair and front brick chimney; construction of rear mud room/porch. 11 Larimer County Assessor, Parcel Number 9712331001, https://www.larimer.org/assessor/search#/detail/R0046493/building, accessed December 23, 2019. 12 Building permit records, FCMOD. 13 Permit no. 4648, March 27, 1927, Building permit records, FCMOD. 14 Permit no. 4648, March 27, 1937, Building permit records, FCMOD. 15 Permit no. 10429, April 8, 1948, Building permit records, FCMOD. 16 Permit no. 13848, August 16, 1954, Building permit records, FCMOD. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 87 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 REFERENCE LIST or SOURCES of INFORMATION Building Permit Collection. Fort Collins History Connection: An Online Collaboration between FCMoD and PRPLD. https://history.fcgov.com/collections/building-permits. City Directory Collection. Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery. Fort Collins, CO. City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Services. Building Permit Collection. Community Development and Neighborhood Services Building. Fort Collins, CO. Colorado Historic Newspapers Collection. Colorado State Library. https://www.coloradohistoricnewspapers.org Fort Collins Coloradoan. Online archives. https://coloradoan.newspapers.com/ Landmark Web Official Records Search. Larimer County Clerk and Recorder. https://records.larimer.org/LandmarkWeb/Home/Index. Sanborn Maps Collection, Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/collections/sanborn- maps/?q=fort+collins+colorado Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery. Tax Assessor Card Collection. Fort Collins, CO. ———. Historical Image and Postcard Collection. Fort Collins, CO. Watrous, Ansel. History of Larimer County. Fort Collins: The Courier Printing and Publishing Company, 1911. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 88 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 MAPS and PHOTOGRAPHS ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 89 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 90 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Figure 1: 1901 Sanborn Fire Insurance map, showing vacant property (p7). Figure 2: 1906 Sanborn Fire Insurance map, showing completed house and original sheds (p15). Future site of Brown-Gooding Property Brown-Gooding Property ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 91 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Figure 3: 1917 Sanborn Fire Insurance map, showing completed auto garage at rear of property (p15). Image 1: East façade, looking west across Mathews Street (December 23, 2019). Brown-Gooding Property ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 92 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Image 2: East façade, looking west (December 23, 2019). Image 3: East façade and south elevation, looking west showing side basement entry and curved bay window (December 23, 2019). ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 93 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Image 4: North elevation, looking southwest (December 23, 2019). Image 5: Rear (west) elevation, looking east and showing rear mud porch addition (December 23, 2019). ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 94 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Image 6: Garage south elevation with parking pad, looking northeast (December 23, 2019). Image 7: Garage north and west elevations, looking southeast (December 23, 2019). ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 95 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Image 8: Properties neighboring to the north, both constructed by Herman Schroeder. On the left is 421 Mathews, and on the right is 419 Mathews, Schroeder’s personal residence and a Fort Collins Landmark (December 23, 2019). Image 9: Rear portion of the south elevation, showing the pair and single windows on the elevation behind the curved bay window (December 23, 2019). ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 96 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned owner, or owners, of the Property hereby submit the Property for designation as a Fort Collins landmark pursuant to the Fort Collins Landmark Preservation Ordinance, Chapter 14 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins. The undersigned owner, or owners, certify that all signatures necessary to consent to the designation of the Property are affixed below. I understand that upon designation, I or my successors will be requested to notify City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation staff prior to the occurrence of any of the following: Preparation of plans for reconstruction or alteration of the exterior of the improvements on the Property or interior spaces readily visible from any public street, alley, park, or other public place; and/or Preparation of plans for construction of, addition to, or demolition of improvements on the Property. DATED this ________________ day of _______________________________, 201___. _____________________________________________________ Owner Name (please print) _____________________________________________________ Owner Signature State of ___________________________) )ss. County of __________________________) Subscribed and sworn before me this _______ day of ___________________, 201____, by____________________________________________________________________. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires _______________________. _____________________________________________________ Notary ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 97 1 Application for Fort Collins Landmark Designation – 425 Mathews Street – Brown-Gooding Property Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission January 15, 2020 Maps 2 425 Mathews – Brown-Gooding Property 1909 Sanborn Map 1917 Sanborn Map 1 2 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 98 3 425 Mathews – Brown-Gooding Property Clyde Brown, 1913, Fort Collins Volunteer Fire Department (Fort Collins Museum of Discovery) Clyde Brown, c.1951, Fort Collins History Museum (Fort Collins Museum of Discovery) 4 425 Mathews – Brown-Gooding Property Left, 421 Mathews (Schroeder project), and right, the Herman Schroeder Herman W. Schroeder (Watrous, 1911) House (built by and for Herman Schroeder). Typical examples of his late- Victorian style, including the curved porch on the right. 3 4 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 99 5 425 Mathews – Brown-Gooding Property Known Projects of Herman W. Schroeder, Builder Date Project Name Location & Details Type of work 1884 Welch’s Block NW Corner of Mountain & College Avenues (redeveloped in early 1900s after fire) Carpentry 1893 Frank Avery House addition Builder & carpentry 1897 Methodist Church College & Olive Carpentry & joinery 1898 Wiedman House 300 Mathews, frame residence demolished in 1906 for Fort Collins Hospital Builder 1899 Corbin & Black Lumber Co. Warehouse 243 N. College, w/ Jonas Boorse (demolished) Builder 1900 421 Mathews 421 Mathews, 6‐room cottage adjoining Schroeder’s own building (intact) Builder/owner 1900 John C. Beers House 311 Whedbee, 5‐room 1.5 story house (modified) Builder 1900 608 Remington (intact) Builder 1901 Fertig residence 619 Whedbee (altered) Builder 1901 Barry residence 645 S. College (altered) Builder 1902 Methodist Episcopal Parsonage S. College & Olive; 2‐story brick, 8 rooms (demolished) Builder (Montezuma Fuller, architect) 1902 Schroeder Residence 419 S. Mathews, 6‐room brick cottage (intact, Landmarked) Builder (owner & resident) 1902 S.B. Purdy residence 216 Remington, 6‐room brick home (curved porch) Builder 1902 John C. Thompson residence 602 S. Peterson, 5‐room brick home (intact) Builder 1902 E.J. Gregory House 429 Mathews (now demolished) Builder 1903 Schroeder House – porch addition 419 Mathews, Addition to Schroeder’s personal residence Builder (owner & resident) 1903 Brown House (this property) 425 Mathews Builder 1903 Nelson House 313 E. Magnolia (intact) Builder 1903 Loomis House 405 Remington (demolished) 1904 Sperr House 633 Mathews; rounded porch (intact) Builder 1905 Mrs. Joseph Murray residence 629 S. Howes, 8‐room brick Builder (w/ Lunn) 1905 R. Breniman residence 222 W. Magnolia, 6‐room frame cottage (demolished) Builder 1905 Mrs. Sarah Stendler residence 527 Mathews, 5‐room frame cottage (altered) Builder 1905 Joseph Kahn residence corner of Matthews and Myrtle, brick (unsure of which building; all 4 are brick in 1906) Builder 1905 Cashier Sheldon residence S. Howes and W. Oak Streets; 8‐room frame residence (demolished) Builder 1905 James B. Arthur estate 328‐334 E. Mulberry, 8‐room residence (intact) Builder, Albert Bryan (architect) 1905 C.B. Andrews residence and carriage house 211 Canon Avenue, 8‐room frame residence and barn (demolished) Builder, Albert Bryan (architect) 1905 C.H. Sheldon residence 131 S. Howes, 6‐room frame residence (demolished) Builder, A.M. Garbutt, architect 1906 Fort Collins Hospital Mathews & Magnolia (altered) Builder 1920 701 Mathews (intact) Builder 1925 730 Mathews (intact) Builder 6 425 Mathews – Brown-Gooding Property East façade of 425 Mathews, showing unique curved Free Classic East façade and south elevation showing curved bay window. porch. 5 6 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 100 7 425 Mathews – Brown-Gooding Property North elevation Rear (west) elevation showing mud porch (likely an addition) 8 425 Mathews – Brown-Gooding Property Garage, south elevation Garage, north and west elevations. 7 8 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 101 9 425 Mathews – Brown-Gooding Property 425 Mathews from across Mathews, showing neighboring properties, looking west. Main building, west and south elevations, looking northeast. • Construction: • Brown-Gooding Property, 1903 • Garage, c.1912 • Standards of Significance: • 3 (Design/Construction) • Exterior Integrity: Location, Design, Setting, Materials, Workmanship, Feeling, and Association 10 425 Mathews – Brown-Gooding Property 9 10 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 102 Role of the Landmark Preservation Commission Determine whether criteria are satisfied: (1) The proposed resource is eligible for designation (1) Significance (2) Integrity (2) The requested designation will advance the policies and the purposes in a manner and extent sufficient to justify the requested designation Adopt a motion making a recommendation to Council 11 12 Application for Fort Collins Landmark Designation – 425 Mathews Street – Brown-Gooding Property Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission January 15, 2020 11 12 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 103 Agenda Item 5 Item 4, Page 1 STAFF REPORT January 15, 2020 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME 714 W. MOUNTAIN AVENUE – CARRIAGE HOUSE ALTERATION – DESIGN REVIEW STAFF Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The property owner is seeking approval for an addition to house indoor parking to their existing historic carriage house. This request is based on a conceptual review placed before the LPC in December 2019, which included two options. The owner has selected an option (Option 1) which involves making an addition of one garage bay to the west elevation of the existing structure. The project also proposes replacement in-kind of the wood shingle cladding on the carriage house, and the installation of windows on the gable-end window openings on the upper floor. Staff has issued a Certificate of Appropriateness for the roof replacement. APPLICANT/OWNER: Henry P. Thode, III. PO Box 1824 Fort Collins, CO 80522-1824 RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the project is generally consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Staff recommends clarification of the color and dimensions of the wood replacement shingles for the historic carriage house, which may affect the appropriate color for the siding on the addition. Staff also recommends a motion that the existing historic garage doors be retained and adapted for new, automated use. With a resolution of those two items, staff recommends issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness for the rehabilitation of, and addition onto, the garage. COMMISSION’S ROLE: The LPC is acting as the decision-maker, and making a decision to approve or not approve the project, as presented. As part of its review, the LPC should consider how well or not well the project meets the City’s requirements as outlined in Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV, including the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. During final review, the Commission shall consider the application and any changes made by the applicant since conceptual review. This is the Commission’s second discussion of the proposed work to this designated landmark. Conceptual review was completed by the LPC in December regarding two options. Option 1, the option adapted for approval at this meeting, is the addition of a new garage bay to the west elevation of the existing carriage house. Option 2, involving enclosure of the existing, non-historic carport, was not selected by the applicant. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: City Council designated the Ault/Thode property at 714 W. Mountain Avenue as a City Landmark on August 18, 2015 as a well-preserved example of a Foursquare dwelling with Classical Revival detailing. The property Packet Pg. 104 Agenda Item 5 Item 4, Page 2 includes an historic 1.5-story carriage house at the rear of the property, clad in wooden shingles. The applicant is seeking an addition onto the carriage house to provide additional indoor vehicle storage, as well as weatherization of the building to allow for a heated workspace. The project would make a shed-roof addition onto the west elevation of the historic carriage house, re-open historic openings in the carriage house to allow for greater access and lighting into the building, and alter the door configuration on the historic carriage house to accommodate the expanded, continued use of the garage. ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION: The 2015 nomination form describes the carriage house as follows: There is what appears to be a historic carriage house on the northeast portion of the lot. The building has open eaves with exposed structural elements and is clad in wooden shingles. The building is 1½ stories with a front-gabled roof and nearly full-width set of doors that open out on the southern elevation. A carport element extends from the front, southern elevation. According to building permit records, this was constructed in 1986 and appears to be attached to the building by a ledger board. The eastern elevation of the building is void of openings, while the western elevation contains two nine-light square windows and an awning feature on its southern end. The rear, or northern elevation, contains a single bay access opening, which is currently covered in wood shingles, in addition to an opening into the second level loft area of the building that is also covered in wood shingles. According to historic Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, the carriage house building was extent as early as 1909. Neither the house, nor the carriage house, is depicted in the 1906 Sanborn map. According to the current property owner, whose family has owned the property since 1955, the carriage house has been clad in wooden shingles for as long as he can remember. ALTERATION HISTORY: Known alterations of the property to date include: • Date unknown – enclosure of rear (alley) entry with wood shingles to match cladding. • 1988 – addition of carport to front of carriage house (confirmed via stop work order in City permit records). HISTORY OF DESIGN REVIEW: This property has undergone Design Review in the past, specifically an addition onto the rear of the main house in 2015 following Landmark designation. The project sought State Historic Tax Credits but the application was unsuccessful. HISTORY OF FUNDED WORK/USE OF INCENTIVES: As noted above, the owner sought State Historic Tax Credits as part of a 2015 rehabilitation but the application was unsuccessful. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK: The applicant is seeking approval by the LPC for the construction of a new garage bay addition onto the west elevation of the existing, historic carriage house, along with other major maintenance items to the historic carriage house. The applicant is also proposing the following repairs or alterations to the property: Items Already Approved by Staff (Minor maintenance) A. Replace asphalt composition roof in-kind (approved by staff) B. Repaint fascia boards on historic carriage house (approved by staff) Items Needing Review and Approval by the LPC C. Supplement existing roof framing with additional ridge beam, rafters, and collar ties D. Replacement of wood shingle wall cladding. E. Alteration of south (primary) garage door opening including installation of a new header beam, Packet Pg. 105 Agenda Item 5 Item 4, Page 3 repainting of the frame, and either: o Replacement of sliding barn doors with operable overhead garage doors, OR o Replacement of barn door hardware to make doors operable with an automatic opener. F. Re-opening of north garage door opening with operable overhead door. Fill and paint frame and casing white. G. Re-install new wood casement windows in existing frames in south gable end and paint white. H. Re-open north gable end window opening and install a casement window to match design for south gable end (Item G) I. Repair hopper windows on west wall of historic carriage house. J. Remove non-historic (c.1988) roof awning over trash bin area. K. Construction of addition onto west elevation of historic carriage house REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Staff has made no requests in advance of this design review. PUBLIC COMMENTS SUMMARY No public comment about this project has been received at this time. STAFF EVALUATION OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Staff has provided a summary of each project element and table review of the overall project below, consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation (the Standards): C. Supplement existing roof framing with additional ridge beam, rafters, and collar ties • Staff Review: Supplementation of existing framing to shore up weak elements is a common method of structural improvement to avoid loss of historic materials. This approach is generally consistent with the Standards. D. Replacement of wood shingle wall cladding. • Staff Review: While wholesale replacement is generally discouraged, a decision to replace materials is generally based on the condition of existing shingles. Photographs and a staff site visit in early November demonstrated that the condition of shingles on the east, west, and north elevations is poor and likely justifies replacement. However, specifications including dimensions and color of the new shingles needs to be provided to confirm this treatment meets the Standards. E. Alteration of south (primary) garage door opening including installation of a new header beam, repainting of the frame, and either: a) Replacement of sliding barn doors with operable overhead garage doors, or; b) Replacement of barn door hardware to make doors operable with an automatic opener. • Staff review: As discussed by staff and the LPC at the December 2019 conceptual review of this item, retaining the garage doors, a character-defining feature of the structure that are in relatively good condition, is essential for the project to meet the Standards. Staff recommends option b above to replace the hardware and make the existing historic doors functional with an automatic opener. F. Re-opening of north garage door opening with operable overhead door. Fill and paint frame and casing white. • Staff review: The date for the enclosure of this historic opening is not known. However, re- opening an historic door opening is a common aspect of rehabilitation projects and is consistent with the Standards. G. Re-install new wood casement windows in existing frames in south gable end and paint white. • Staff review: The date for the modification of this historic opening is not known. However, restoration of an historic window based on existing materials and historic photographs is a common aspect of rehabilitation projects and is consistent with the Standards. H. Re-open north gable end window opening and install a casement window to match design for south gable end (Item G) • Staff review: The date for the infill of this historic opening is not known. However, re-opening Packet Pg. 106 Agenda Item 5 Item 4, Page 4 an historic window opening is a common aspect of rehabilitation projects and is consistent with the Standards. I. Repair hopper windows on west wall of historic carriage house. • Staff review: Rehabilitation of the existing windows appears consistent with the Standards, although the windows will be enclosed by the new addition. While not ideal, within the constraints of the site, this treatment appears to meet the Standards. J. Remove non-historic (c.1988) roof awning over trash bin area. • Staff review: This feature does not appear to be historic, nor is the addition of the carport itself. Removal appears consistent with the Standards. K. Construction of addition onto west elevation of historic carriage house including partial demolition of the west wall in between the windows to accommodate a passageway between the addition and the historic garage. • Staff Review: Generally, the design of the addition as a shed-roof addition with 3” lapsiding is compatible, distinguishable, and subordinate to the historic carriage house. Demolition of the passageway between the addition and the historic garage bay is a standard treatment (as is the expanding of a window opening to accommodate a passageway). Anchoring methods of the addition into the historic building appears easily reversible. Considering that the historic carriage house appears to have been stained or painted a darker color in the past, a darker color for the addition’s siding may be appropriate, although color changes and repainting occurred often on secondary structures such as this. In general, staff considers the project generally consistent with the Standards. However, clarification is needed regarding the replacement wood shingle wall cladding and the historic garage doors to confirm that the proposed project meets Rehabilitation Standards 2, 5, and 6. Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis – In General Standard Met (Y/N) SOI #1 A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. There is no proposed change in use as a result of this project. Y SOI #2 The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Overall, distinctive spaces and spatial relationships of the property are being retained. The primary impositions on historic character are the covering of the 9-lite hopper windows along the west elevation by the addition, and the potential replacement of the garage doors. While not ideal, the constraints of the site and property lines require an addition onto the west elevation, and the project will retain and repair the windows in place. Of paramount concern under this Standard is retaining the historic garage doors. Adapting the existing doors to use with an automatic opener and with improvements for energy efficiency should meet this Standard. ? SOI #3 Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. The proposed addition appears to meet this Standard, being sufficiently differentiated from the original building to avoid a false sense of history. Y Packet Pg. 107 Agenda Item 5 Item 4, Page 5 SOI #4 Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. The proposed addition does not appear to be affecting any alterations to the building that would be historic in their own right. Y SOI #5 Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. As noted above, distinctive spaces and spatial relationships of the property are being retained. The primary concern under this Standard is the potential replacement of the garage doors. Adapting the existing doors to use with an automatic opener and with improvements for energy efficiency should meet this Standard. ? SOI #6 Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. The option to rehabilitate the historic garage doors to a new, automated track system would be consistent with this Standard, while replacement likely would not. The door tracks are in need of repair or replacement, but the doors themselves are in good condition. ? SOI #7 Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. N/A SOI #8 Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. Excavation for the proposed addition is anticipated to be minor, and based on the significance of the property, archaeological discoveries made during construction are not anticipated to provide important information. Y SOI #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The addition itself appears compatible, distinguishable, and subordinate to the historic carriage house, meeting this Standard. Y SOI #10 New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. The demolition of west wall of carriage house to provide access to the proposed addition is minimal and appears consistent with this Standard. Anchoring methods into the carriage house’s west elevation appear minimal and easily reversible. Y INDEPENDENT EVALUATION SUMMARY N/A Packet Pg. 108 Agenda Item 5 Item 4, Page 6 FINDINGS OF FACT: In evaluating the request for the addition to the carriage house at 714 W. Mountain Avenue under Chapter 14, Article IV of Municipal Code, staff makes the following findings of fact: 1. Generally, the project as presented, appears to be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, although clarification is needed on the treatment of the historic garage doors and the specifications of replacement siding shingles. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the project is generally consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Staff recommends clarification of the color and dimensions of the wood replacement shingles for the historic carriage house, which may affect the appropriate color for the siding on the addition. Staff also recommends a motion that the existing historic garage doors be retained and adapted for new, automated use. With a resolution of those two items, staff recommends issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness for the rehabilitation of, and addition onto, the garage. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application for Conceptual Review w/ Option sketches 2. 2015 Landmark Designation Application 3. Staff Presentation Packet Pg. 109 City of Fort Collins Design Review Application Page 1 Design Review Application Historic Preservation Division Fill this form out for all applications regarding designated historic buildings within the city limits of the City of Fort Collins. Review is required for these properties under Chapter 14, Article IV of the Fort Collins Municipal Code. Applicant Information Applicant’s Name Daytime Phone Evening Phone Mailing Address (for receiving application-related correspondence) State Zip Code Email Property Information (put N/A if owner is applicant) Owner’s Name Daytime Phone Evening Phone Mailing Address (for receiving application-related correspondence) State Zip Code Email Project Description Provide an overview of your project. Summarize work elements, schedule of completion, and other information as necessary to explain your project. Reminders: Complete application would need all of checklist items as well as both pages of this document. Detailed scope of work should include measurements of existing and proposed. The following attachments are REQUIRED: Complete Application for Design Review Detailed Scope of Work (and project plans, if available) Color photos of existing conditions Please note: if the proposal includes partial or full demolition of an existing building or structure, a separate demolition application will need to be approved. Additional documentation may be required to adequately depict the project, such as plans, elevations, window study, or mortar analysis. If there is insufficient documentation on the property, the applicant may be required to submit an intensive-level survey form (at the applicant’s expense). ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 110 City of Fort Collins Design Review Application Page 2 Detail of Proposed Rehabilitation Work (*Required) If your project includes multiple features (e.g. roof repair and foundation repair), you must describe each feature separately and provide photographs and other information on each feature. Feature A Name: Describe property feature and its condition: Describe proposed work on feature: Feature B Name: Describe property feature and its condition: Describe proposed work on feature: Use Additional Worksheets as needed. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 111 City of Fort Collins Design Review Application Page 3 Required Additional information The following items must be submitted with this completed application. Digital submittals preferred for photographs, and for other items where possible. At least one current photo for each side of the house. Photo files or prints shall be named/labeled with applicant name and elevation. For example, smitheast.jpg, smithwest.jpg, etc. If submitted as prints, photos shall be labeled Photos for each feature as described in the section “Detail of Proposed Rehabilitation Work”. Photo files or prints shall be named or labeled with applicant name and feature letter. For example, smitha1.jpg, smitha2.jpg, smithb.jpg, smithc.jpg, etc. Depending on the nature of the project, one or more of the following items shall be submitted. Your contractor should provide these items to you for attachment to this loan application. Drawing with dimensions. Product specification sheet(s). Description of materials included in the proposed work. Color sample(s) or chip(s) of all proposed paint colors. Partial or full demolition is a part of this project. Partial demolition could include scopes such as taking off existing rear porches to create space for a new addition or removing an existing wall or demolishing a roof. If you are taking away pieces of the existing residence, you are likely undergoing some partial demolition. Signature of Applicant Date ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 112 City of Fort Collins Design Review Application Property Name_____________________ Extra Worksheet Page Detail of Proposed Rehabilitation Work (*Required) [Continuation Sheet] If your project includes multiple features (e.g. roof repair and foundation repair), you must describe each feature separately and provide individual costs for each feature. Feature __ Name: Describe property feature and its condition: Describe proposed work on feature: Feature __ Name: Describe property feature and its condition: Describe proposed work on feature: Use Additional Worksheets as needed. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 113 City of Fort Collins Design Review Application Property Name_____________________ Extra Worksheet Page Detail of Proposed Rehabilitation Work (*Required) [Continuation Sheet] If your project includes multiple features (e.g. roof repair and foundation repair), you must describe each feature separately and provide individual costs for each feature. Feature __ Name: Describe property feature and its condition: Describe proposed work on feature: Feature __ Name: Describe property feature and its condition: Describe proposed work on feature: Use Additional Worksheets as needed. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 114 City of Fort Collins Design Review Application Property Name_____________________ Extra Worksheet Page Detail of Proposed Rehabilitation Work (*Required) [Continuation Sheet] If your project includes multiple features (e.g. roof repair and foundation repair), you must describe each feature separately and provide individual costs for each feature. Feature __ Name: Describe property feature and its condition: Describe proposed work on feature: Feature __ Name: Describe property feature and its condition: Describe proposed work on feature: Use Additional Worksheets as needed. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 115 City of Fort Collins Design Review Application Property Name_____________________ Extra Worksheet Page Detail of Proposed Rehabilitation Work (*Required) [Continuation Sheet] If your project includes multiple features (e.g. roof repair and foundation repair), you must describe each feature separately and provide individual costs for each feature. Feature __ Name: Describe property feature and its condition: Describe proposed work on feature: Feature __ Name: Describe property feature and its condition: Describe proposed work on feature: Use Additional Worksheets as needed. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 116 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6((6(3$5$7(6&23(2):25.'2&80(17)25'(7$,/6 $5&+,7(&7 -())*$,1(6+,*+&5$)7%8,/'(56  2)),&( FLOOR PLAN NOTES ',0(16,216$5(72)$&(2)6758&785$/(/(0(17 678'6&21&5(7(:$//6 (7& 127( 6&+('8/($5($6$5(,17(1'(')25(67,0$7,1*385326(621/<$1' 0$<127$&&85$7(/<5()/(&7$&78$/&21',7,216 ,17+(),(/' 7*$5$*(6/$%    7 (1  $POUFYU*NBHFT ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 120 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 121 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 122 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 123 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 124 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 125 'FBUVSF*NBHFT ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 126 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 127 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 128 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 129 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 130   ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 131 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 132              ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 133 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 134 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 135 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 136 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 137 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 138 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 139 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 140 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 141 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 142 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 143 Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com DH-36 Architect Series® Traditional Hung Window Scale 3" = 1' 0" All dimensions are approximate. ✁ ✂ ✄ ☎ ✆ ✂ ✄ ✝ ✁ ✞ ✟ ✠ ✡ ☎ ✠ ☎ ✝ ☛ ☞ ✂ ✌ ✞ ✁ ☎ ✂ ✍ ✁ ✎ ✞ ✟ ✂ ✎ ✞ ✏ ✑ ✍ ✎ ✍ ✎ ✏ ✞ ✎ ✂ ✁ ✒ ✔✓ ✓✕ ✗✖ ✚✙✘ ✕✔ ✛✙ ✜✔ ✢ ✣ ✤ ✥ ✦ ✤ ✧ ✦ ★ ✩ ✢ ✪ ✤ ✥ ✦ ✦ ✧ ✦ ★ ✩ ✫ ✬ ✭ ✮ ✯ ✰ ✱ ✲ ✳ ✴ ✶✵ ✸✷ ✹✹ ✺✹✻ ✼✷ ✹✵ ✸✾✽ ✼✿ ✢ ✤ ✣ ✥ ✪ ✤ ✧ ❀ ✩ ✢ ✪ ✤ ✥ ✦ ✦ ✧ ✦ ★ ✩ ✶✵ ✸✷ ✹✹ ✹✻✺ ✼✷ ✫ ✬ ✭ ✮ ✯ ✰ ✱ ✲ ✳ ✴ ✺✵ ✸✺ ✹ ✹✻✿ ✼✷ ✢ ✣ ✤ ✥ ✦ ✤ ✧ ✦ ★ ✩ ✢ ✣ ❁ ✥ ✦ ❂ ✧ ✦ ★ ✩ ✢ ✤ ✣ ✥ ✪ ✤ ✧ ❀ ✩ ❃✵ ✸✶ ✹✺ ✹✻✹ ✼✷ ❄ ✁ ☎ ✄ ✠ ✡ ✡ ✠ ✄ ✂ ✍ ✁ ❅ ✂ ✁ ❆ ❇ ✄ ✂ ✍ ✁ ✠ ✡ ❅ ✍ ✡ ✏ ❈ ✍ ✄ ✺✵ ✸✾ ✹ ✹✻✾ ✼✷ Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com ED-78 Pella® Entry Doors Scale 3" = 1' 0" All dimensions are approximate. ✁ ✂ ✄ ☎ ☎ ✆ ✝ ☎ ✂ ✞ ✠✟ ☛✡ ☞ ☞✌✡ ✎✍ ✆ ✏ ✄ ☎ ☎ ✝ ✁ ✞ ✆ ☎ ✄ ☎ ☎ ✝ ✁ ✞ ✑ ✒ ✓ ✔ ✕ ✖ ✖ ✕ ✔ ✗ ✘ ✒ ✙ ✗ ✒ ✚ ✛ ✔ ✗ ✘ ✒ ✕ ✖ ✙ ✘ ✖ ✜ ✢ ✘ ✣ ✔ ☞✟ ☛✡✤ ✦✥ ✎✧✌ ☞☞✟ ☛✍ ✡✤ ☞✌ ✎✍ ✠✟ ☛✠ ☞ ☞✌✥ ✎✍ ✆ ☎ ✄ ☎ ☎ ✝ ✁ ✞ ✏ ★ ✄ ☎ ✆ ✝ ☎ ✂ ✞ ✩ ✕ ✪ ✗ ✕ ✫ ✖ ✬ ✭ ✪ ✕ ✮ ✬ ✜ ✬ ✛ ✔ ✯ ✰ ✱ ✕ ✓ ✯ ✬ ✜ ✖ ✗ ✒ ✬ ✓ ✗ ✒ ✜ ✗ ✲ ✕ ✔ ✬ ✳ ✑ ✴ ✵ ✶ ✷ ✸ ✹ ✴ ✷ ✶ ✺ ✷ ✴ ✻ ✼✟ ☛✧☞ ✽ ✾ ❀ ✿ ❁ ❁❂ ❃ ✡✧ ☞❄ ✎✍ ❅ ✾ ❀ ❆ ❇ ❈ ✠✟ ☛✠ ☞ ☞✌✥ ✎✍ ☞✟ ☛✤✧ ✽ ✾ Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-16 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Scale 3" = 1' 0" All dimensions are approximate. ✁ ✂ ☎✄ ✆ ✝ ✞ ✠✟ ✡ ✡☛ ☞ ✌ ✍☛ ✁  ✂ ☎✄ ✆ ✝ ✞ ✠✟ ✡ ✡☛ ☞ ✌ ✍☛ ✎ ✏ ✑ ✒ ✓ ✔ ✕ ✖ ✗ ✘ ✙ ✚ ✛ ✜ ✢ ✣ ✤ ✥ ✦ ✧ ★ ✩ ✪ ✪ ✫ ✬ ✥ ✭ INSULATE ALL VOIDS AT WINDOW PERIMETER (BY OTHERS). SEAL UNIT TO EXTERIOR / BLIND STOP. NOTE: WALL CONSTRUCTION AND OLD DOUBLE-HUNG FRAME SHOWN ARE EXISTING; OLD DOUBLE-HUNG SASH HAS BEEN REMOVED. REFER TO THE APPROPRIATE PELLA INSTALLATION INSTRUCTION FOR COMPLETE STEP BY STEP INSTRUCTIONS. SHIM AND PLUMB UNITS AS REQUIRED. SEAL UNIT TO EXTERIOR / BLIND STOP. SEAL THE UNIT TO EXISTING STOOL AND WINDOW SILL. Installation Details - Wood Exterior Sash Rev. 09/13/2019 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 146 chiohd.com 1485 Sunrise Drive | Arthur, IL 61911 | USA Your Local Garage Door Professional 5400 OVERLAY CARRIAGE HOUSE WOOD PERSONALIZING OPTIONS GOOD / BETTER / BEST ]c */06]LYOLHK+VVYZ (SSPUMVYTH[PVUWYLZLU[LKPZIHZLKVU[OLZWLJPÄJH[PVUZHUKMLH[\YLZH]HPSHISLH[[OL[PTLVMWYPU[PUNHUKPZZ\IQLJ[[VJOHUNL^P[OV\[UV[PJL CARRIAGE HOUSE DESIGNS Square Tops Arched Tops 10 11 12 10A 11A 12A 13 14 15 13A 14A 15A 30 31 32 30A 31A 32A 33 34 35 33A 34A 35A WOOD1 Cedar Mahogany WINDOW DESIGNS Double Row Plain Stockton Madison Arched Plain Arched Stockton Arched Madison Single Row Plain Stockton Madison Arched Plain Arched Stockton Arched Madison GLASS4 Plain available as non-insulated Polycarbonate Plain Tinted Obscure Glue Chip Seeded Faux EXTERIOR HARDWARE Spade Wrought Iron Barcelona 1 Barcelona 2 :WLJPÄJH[PVUZ 7HULS:[`SL Overlay 6]LYSH`4H[LYPHS Western Red Cedar or Fijian Mahogany :LJ[PVU*VUZ[Y\J[PVU 2-3/4” Thick - 2-Sided Steel :LJ[PVU4H[LYPHS Medium Duty / 272 Ga. Steel 0UZ\SH[PVU;`WL 1-13/16” Polystyrene 9]HS\L;OLYTHS 7LYMVYTHUJL R-10.78 >PUKV^:[`SL3 Square or Arched .SHZZ Insulated and Non-Insulated -)*>PUK3VHK4 Non-Impact and Impact Rated ;+0>PUK3VHK4 Impact Rated Only >HYYHU[` Limited Lifetime on Sections 3 Years on Overlays 3 Years on Springs 6 Years on Hardware 1 Refer to your local C.H.I. Dealer for exact wood type match. 2 Lower steel gauge [ga.] number indicates stronger steel. 3 Model number indicates design and window style. 4 Ask your local C.H.I. Dealer about our full line of wind load rated doors. *PAINT WHITE ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 147 Edison Sliding Opener Installation Manual ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 148 It is recommended that you have a low voltage electrician, or trade member familiar with garage door installations to install the operator. You may call us or the manufacturer to see if there is anyone in your area familiar with the Fremont Opener. Real Carriage Door & Sliding Hardware is not liable for any damage that occurs during install, and replacements are the sole responsibility of the installer and customer. The manufacturer does carry a warranty for any defects or issues that are from manufacturing only and will have to be tested by the manufacturer’s technical team before sending re- placements. It is also a good idea to install a surge protector to avoid any damage to the operator. The operator can be damaged by power surges or faulty wiring. CAUTION Table of Contents Packaging ........................................................................................................................4 8UJHN ܪHFYNTSX ..................................................................................................................6 • Motor Carriage.....................................................................................................................................................................8 • Control Unit ..........................................................................................................................................................................10 System Overview ..............................................................................................................12 Installation Instructions ....................................................................................................14 • Connecting the rails ............................................................................................................................................................14 • Chain Tensioner and Wire Connector .............................................................................................................................14 • Ceiling Bracket .....................................................................................................................................................................15 • Attaching the Swing Arm Fitting ......................................................................................................................................15 • Header Brackets ..................................................................................................................................................................16 • Push Rods ............................................................................................................................................................................17 • Wiring Instructions for the Wire Connector ...................................................................................................................18 • Inserting ACCU (battery backup) .....................................................................................................................................18 Photo Eyes .......................................................................................................................19 Wall Station ......................................................................................................................20 Autoset Programming ......................................................................................................22 • Red Limit Stop .....................................................................................................................................................................22 • Autoset ..................................................................................................................................................................................23 After Autoset Completion .................................................................................................24 • Battery Pack (ACCU) Installation .....................................................................................................................................24 • Adjusting the Close Limit ..................................................................................................................................................24 Accessories .....................................................................................................................25 • Remotes ...............................................................................................................................................................................25 • Homelink ...............................................................................................................................................................................25 • Battery Pack .........................................................................................................................................................................26 • MEMO....................................................................................................................................................................................26 • SOMLINK ..............................................................................................................................................................................26 • SENSO...................................................................................................................................................................................27 • Outdoor Keypad ..................................................................................................................................................................27 • Wireless Wall Control .........................................................................................................................................................28 Maintenance and Care ......................................................................................................28 All California residents must have a battery backup installed with electronic door openers according to Senate Bill No. 969. Please call our main line for assistance or check out our website for additional information. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 149 Page 4 Packaging Packaging Page 5 -1 receiver photo eye (red sticker) (3) -1 mounting bracket left (4) -1 mounting bracket (right) (5) -2 wing nuts M6 (6) -2 carriage bolts M6 (7) -4 screws 3/8” (8) Note: Weights will vary based on additional hardware that is ordered. The weight is per 9ft section of rail with motor and control unit housing. This does not include extensions or other hardware ordered. Extensions (optional per application) Extension packages are shipped seperately from the main box. 3ft extensions are 23” x 8” x 2” and are 4.45 lbs 5ft extensions are 44” x 8” x 2” and are 6.95 lbs • Additional ceiling bracket (part 6 of main box) • Magnetic coupler • Masterlink • Chain • Rail Extension Additional Parts Box This box includes additional items needed for your sliding door application. The package dimensions are 15” x 12” x 3” This box will include: 1. Secondary remote for your convenience. Keep this remote separate from the one included in the main box. This remote is not programmed to the opener yet. 2. Door connection hardware pack • (1) 3/8” x 1-1/2” washer (qty 4) • (2) Ring Spacer 3/8” x 7/8” (qty 2) • (3) 3/8” nylon lock-nut (qty 7) • (4) 3/8” x 1” bolt (qty 3) • (5) 3/8” x 3-3/4” bolt (qty 2) • (6) 3/8” x 1” carriage bolt (qty 4) • (7) 3/8” lock washer (qty 4) • (8) 3/8” nut (qty 4) • (9) 3/8” x 1-1/2” lag screw • (10) Door bracket 3. Additional Header bracket (part 11 in main box) 4. : ܪYYNSLX  5. Wire connector (optional depending on install application) 6. Battery Backup (optional except for CA residents) Note: Any additional accessories ordered will be included in this box When unpacking, make sure that all items are included in the packages. If anything is missing, contact us. The actual content may vary depending TSYMJXUJHN ܪHTWIJW Packaging The Edison Opener will ship out in multiple packages. Weight and size will vary depending on order. The main package is for your base kit: Page 6 8UJHN ܪHFYNTSX 8UJHN ܪHFYNTSX Page 7 The standard setup (without extra memory) can memorize up to 40 commands, and each channel utilizes 10 of those. If all 4 channels are used you can have up to 10 remotes. Dip Switches Dip switch 3 must be turned on for sliding door applications. Dip Switch ON OFF 1 Automatic closing activated Automatic closing deactivated 2 Partial opening active Illumination function 3 Side-opening sectional door Sectional door 4 Retractable door Sectional door Reset Button The length of time the reset button is pressed will IJ ܪSJ\MFYNXWJXJYXJJGJQT\TUYNTSX • 1-2 seconds will reset the safety devices • 5 seconds the force values will be deleted • 10 seconds the end position (or close) will be deleted • 30 seconds will be full factory reset Specifications The Edison operator can run up to 25ft right out of the box and can be programmed to operate up to 30ft. The control board has a motor brake function, meaning if the motor speed is exceeded, the motor brake actively uses the brake resistor. There are also terminals that allow you to hook up to your home automation system. Force process and positions are always known by the control unit, and any changes (attempted break in) will be recognized. Because of the learn mode (autoset), the motor will learn the force required to move the door. This means the operator will not run at full strength (unless needed), but instead adapts to your application. With this operator there is only one limit switch that needs to be installed, and the motor carriage is simply laid out and pre-installed on the rails. Note: For additional information please visit the manufacturer’s (Sommer) manual • Troubleshooting page 59 • Warranty information page 66 • Ceiling mounting and position page 23 Technical Data 2060 evo+ 2080 evo+ 2110 evo+ Page 8 2TYTW(FWWNFLJ 2TYTW(FWWNFLJ Page 9 Connection options for Motor Carriage Function/application example Magnetic slot (green), lock terminal, Locking magnet MOTION slot (white) terminal for movement sensor 3-pin MEMO slot, Memo terminal, memory expansion for 450 transmitter commands USART slot, terminal e.g. module, home automation SENSO slot, terminal for SENSO, humidity sensor BUZZER slot (black), terminal for warning/ alarm buzzer LASER slot (white), terminal for parking position sensor Safety contact strip 8k2 terminal OSE safety contact strip terminal, +12V = br, OSE = gn, GND = wh Wicket door fuse terminal, contact command, (12V/10mA) normally closed contact, potential free Output 12V/DC, max 100mA, +12 V, GND = WH, power supply for optional accessories, ܪSLJWXHFSSJWTW external lighting Motor Carriage Control Board Number Connection Options 1 LED CH 1-4 (red) display for radio channel 2 Magnetic slot (green) lock terminal 3 Limit switch terminal (OPEN) limit (blue) 4 PCB label 5 LEDs opener lighting 6 MEMO slot MEMO terminal 7 USART slot interface 8 BUZZER slot (black) Warning or alarm buzzer terminal 9 SENSO slot SENSO terminal 10 LASER slot (white) Parking position Page 10 (TSYWTQ:SNY (TSYWTQ:SNY Page 11 Function Example Battery slot, ACCU Terminal for battery pack Keypad (black) Terminal for button connector cable of the wall control unit (only for type pro +) Terminal for relay, switching capacity max 5 A/120 V AC max: 5 A/24 V DC 2-pin Terminal power supply 120 V AC 50/60 hz 2-pin Terminal Transformer primary side 120 V AC 50/60 Hz 2-pin Terminal 24 V AC Transformer secondary side 2-pin Terminal Chain and Track 24 V AC Light slot (white) Terminal for Lumi+ supplementary lighting 2-pin Terminal Safety Sensors any polarity 2-pin Terminal wall station or wall button potential free Deinstalling the Control Unit Cover 1. Disconnect the opener from the main power supply 2. Unscrew and remove the cover from the ceiling control unit Note: If a battery pack is used, unscrew the cover carefully. Disconnect the battery pack plug from the control board. Remove the cover with the disconnected battery pack Reinstalling Control Unit Cover After working on the ceiling control unit replace the cover in reverse order. Connect the opener to the main power supply Control Unit Control Board Number Connection Options 1 DIP switches 2 ACCU slot Terminal for battery pack 3 Keypad (black) Terminal for button connector cable of the wall control unit 4 Terminal for relay 5 2-pin Terminal power supply 120 V Page 12 8^XYJR4[JW[NJ\ 8^XYJR4[JW[NJ\ Page 13 (like the height above opening) Bypassing Doors You can utilize either the side mount or ceiling mount option, and choose whichever is better for ^TZWXUJHN ܪHFUUQNHFYNTS9MNXTUJSJWNXJFXNQ^ adapted for unique situations and it is up to the NSXYFQQJWYT ܪSIYMJHTWWJHYRTZSYNSLQTHFYNTS.YNX important to make sure the door bracket is installed in a location that helps the door clear the opening as much as possible, and that the rail is mounted in a spot that allows the motors to travel to the necessary locations. The most common bypass scenario has two doors staying within the opening, and one door moves at a time. This opener is not suited to allow both doors to operate at the same time or when there are applications where the doors clear the opening. For applications where the doors are collecting you would only need a single motor YTTUJWFYJ+TWFS^HQFWN ܪHFYNTSTWVZJXYNTSXUQJFXJ call customer service at 1-800-694-5977. • Opposite of the other two applications, the open end of the rail is actually in the center of the opening instead of the outside. This means the rails must overlap in the center so the doors clear their half of the opening as much as possible • The amount of offset depends on your application. Measure from the end of the rail to the where the door bracket attaches to the boomerang arm. The angle of the boomerang arm changes (which also changes the measurement) depending on your application (like the height above opening) • If you do have the available space you can mount one opener on the side wall and one on the ceiling. It is recommended to install the wire connector to save space • It is very important to not allow both operators to function at the same time, otherwise they will bind and possibly cause damage. It is vital that the wicket switches are installed for safety purposes System Overview • The control unit housing can be mounted at one end of the rail if there is enough space to the side of the opening. Otherwise the wire connector can be installed in its place allowing the control unit housing to be mounted anywhere convenient • The control unit end of the track is always the open end of the track • The red limit stop is located on the opening end of the rail (same as the wire connector or control unit) • The boomerang arm is pointing towards the closing end of the rail • The closing end of the track has a programmable end stop • If your opening is smaller than our standard Page 14 .SXYFQQFYNTS.SXYWZHYNTSX .SXYFQQFYNTS.SXYWZHYNTSX Page 15 Ceiling Bracket 1. To install the ceiling bracket (part 6) take the 3⁄4” L bracket and insert the bolts (part 7) through the bracket where the hollowed-out notch is on each side (this is what mounts it to the ceiling) 2. Note: you may have additional ceiling brackets depending on your application. 3. Place one side against the top of the rail, and the other at the bottom facing each other 4. Slide the pieces together so they interlock 5. 9TYNLMYJSYMJGTQYX ܪWXYMFSIYNLMYJSYMJRFSI then with a socket only 1-2 more revolutions Important Notes: • It is important to not overtighten • Do not force the pieces together, they should NSYJWQTHPJFXNQ^2FPJXZWJYMJ^FWJ ܪWRQ^ pressed against rail and the brackets are aligned. • For applications where you must drop the opener down from the ceiling we provide an option for a secondary ceiling bracket for additional support. If you need an additional bracket please call to place an order. Attaching the Boomerang Arm 1. Locate the arm attachment location on the motor carriage (this should be facing the closing direction of the doors) 2. Insert boomerang arm and secure with provided fasteners from the additional parts box For Ceiling Mount Applications For Side-wall applications Header Brackets and Mounting • Attachment must be to adequate framing or strapping • Drywall only attachment is not permitted • The track must not come into contact with the door’s supporting sliding track at any time • The curved brace may be rotated for maximum ܫJ]NGNQNY^NSYMJNSXYFQQ • When sliding hardware is on the same side as the opener the opener must be ceiling mounted or mounted on a bump out ledger to gain clearance over the sliding hardware. 1. Place the rail into each header bracket over the chain tensioner or wire connector 2. Insert pin into the header bracket and tensioner with the holes lined up 3. Secure with c-clips Page 16 .SXYFQQFYNTS.SXYWZHYNTSX .SXYFQQFYNTS.SXYWZHYNTSX Page 17 Wicket Switch Installation Note: This is for bypassing applications only The wicket switch door safety device prevents both doors from operating at the same time. The black wicket device must be installed so the switch is reliably triggered each time, for example it can engage with the door, door hardware or motor itself. • The wicket switches are wired into the opposite motor carriage. For example the wicket installed for the left door is wired into the right motor carriage • .YNXZUYTYMJNSXYFQQJWYT ܪSIFUWTUJW\F^YT engage the switch • .YNXZUYTYMJNSXYFQQJWYT ܪSIFXFKJFSIXJHZWJ way to run the wicket switch cable since the motor carriages move. The recommended way is to secure the cable to the top of the door so it will move with the door/motor and be routed up the arm to the motor (this prevents loose hanging cables and zip ties are an easy way to secure wire) • The contact command is at 12 V/10 mA. The normally closed contact is potential-neutral • Wicket switch video: : https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=PXyPTn9XNl0 1. Locate a reliable trigger point for each door • Mount the wicket switch 2. Route the wire above the opening to the opposite motor carriage • Take special care that the wire will not get pinched or bind 3. Wire in the wicket switch to the wicket door fuse terminal, see below graphic • It is on the bottom left of the board, refer to page 8 for more information Inserting ACCU (battery backup) Make sure the unit is unplugged. 1. Place the battery pack loosely in its position on the cover and plug the battery pack plug into the ACCU battery slot on the control board 2. Screw on cover 3. Finish battery backup test on page 24 after the autoset is complete the door 2. Swivel the boomerang FWRFSIYMJZ ܪYYNSL assembly to determine the best placement 3. Mark the location of the brace’s two mounting holes 4. Cut the door bracket to length (if desired) and plug the end with the cap provided 5. Install the bracket onto the door with the hex head lag screws provided 6. Pre-drill through the bracket where the U-Fitting meets it (this position will change Page 18 .SXYFQQFYNTS.SXYWZHYNTSX 5MTYT*^JX Page 19 Photo Eyes The 2-wire safety sensors must be connected to the Control Housing Unit. Initial Operation is not possible without the safety sensors. The photo eyes are automatically detected during initial operation. • If you want to use your own wires you can, be sure to use 22 gauge. • The photo eyes are labeled with colored stickers. • The green is the sender • The red is the receiver Positioning of the Photo Eyes • The lights should be solid when they are properly connected, if they are blinking it means they have power but are not aligned properly. • It is very important that the red is not in the direct sunlight as it will detect the beam from the other photo eye. • Do not mount the safety sensors in the path of the moving garage door. Mount at least 1” away from it • The distance between the transmitter and receiver of the safety sensors set can range up to a maximum of 20’. If you have a runtime of over 20’ (for a single door) please contact customer service • 9MJINXYFSHJKWTRYMJ ܫTTWRZXYGJXJQJHYJI so that an obstacle of 6” high can be reliably detected • This corresponds to a distance of 2” from the bottom edge of the installation bracket to the ܫTTW • Mount one safety sensor to the left and one to the right of the door. • It does not matter which safety sensor is installed on the left or on the right side Installation 1. Look for a suitable installation position for the mounting bracket (1) inside the garage to the left and the right of the door 2. Hold the mounting bracket (1) to the wall and mark the mounting points • The distance from the bottom edge of the installation bracket to the ܫTTWNXѧ 3. The height and angle of the bracket can Page 20 <FQQ8YFYNTS <FQQ8YFYNTS Page 21 3. Unscrew the screws 1/8” by 3/8” (2) so that the wire ends can be wrapped around the screws 4. Wrap both stripped wire ends around the screws. It does not matter which wire is wrapped around which screw (polarity proof connection) 5. Tighten both screws and check if the wire ends FWJMJQI ܪWRQ^ 6. Select and mark the upper mounting point 7. Insert screw (1/8” x 1/2”) far enough (approximately 1/8”) so the housing will hang on the wall 8. For drywall installations using a drill with a 3/16” masonry but drill two holes and insert two anchors 3/16” 9. Run the cable through one of the holes, located on the sides or top of the housing. 10. Clip out the cover (1) with a small screwdriver or by pushing it out from the rear 11. Hang the housing (2) and attach it with a 6/32 x 1” screws 12. Fit the cover in on the left side (1) and click it in on the right side (2) 13. Run the wire from the wall station to the Control Unit Housing and secure with suitable material 14. Connect the wall station wires to the terminal block on the circuit board. The connection is potential- free Wall Station Buttons (1) Opening, stopping and closing (2) Turning the lighting on and off (3) Locking or unlocking the operator Wall Station Operation 1. Press the button (1) to open and close • The door opens or closes depending on starting position 2. Press the button (1) during opening or closing process • The door stops 3. Press the button (1) again • The door moves into the respective starting position Turning the lighting on and off The button (2) lights up green when the wall station is ready for operation and the operator is not locked 1. Press the button (2) • Operator lighting switched on 2. Pressing the button (2) again switches the operator lighting back off • Operator lighting off Note: The lighting cannot be switched off when the operator is moving M6 (1) and the wing nut M6 (2) to the mounting bracket (3) Page 22 &ZYTXJY5WTLWFRRNSL &ZYTXJY5WTLWFRRNSL Page 23 the force and take the pressure off the hardware. This may not work for all install applications. Caution! We do not recommend using yourself or any other persons to stop the door at the closing limit as this may result in injury. 7. Press the 1st button to activate the opener to return the open limit • The opener will continue the autoset (learn mode) on its own 8. The motor carriage will go back and forth across the rail between the limits so it can learn the push force required to move your doors • During learn mode the LED lights will be ܫFXMNSL 9. As soon as the programming is complete the light will remain solid and is then ready for use Warning! It is very important to not interrupt or stop the opener prematurely during its programming. Note: The number of repetitions will vary based on your door. The heavier the doors are the more passes are required for the opener. Troubleshooting 1. Opener will not operate • If the motor does not operate or power up at all make sure the chain is not loose and touching the rail as this will cause a short in the system • Photo eyes are commonly incorrectly wired into the orange terminal, the LED lights on the photo eyes will light up but the opener will not operate • Do not grease/lubricate the chain or rail. This will LZSPZUYMJX^XYJRFSI\NQQINXWZUYYMJ ܫT\TK electricity • If you are getting power to the control unit but the nothing will work (and there may also be a buzzing noise from the transformer) check the fuse located next to the transformer. It is located in a black rubber junction in the wiring • If you are getting intermittent operation with the opener check to make sure nothing is between the rail and chain. For example if a scew or other object touches it will cause a short Autoset Programming Red Limit Stop 1. Disengage the motor • Pull the red chord (emergency release) until it disengages. This will allow you to move the door freely to see where the door needs to stop 2. Place the doors in open position 3. Position the red stop accordingly • Tighten the limit back down 4. Place the doors in the halfway open position • Re-engage the motor by pulling the red emergency release chord Autoset Make sure dip switch 3 is turned on before proceeding and plug in the unit. Note: It is helpful to keep the motor carriage cover off during autoset Page 24 &KYJW&ZYTXJY(TRUQJYNTS &HHJXXTWNJX Page 25 Remotes Refer to page 39 in the Sommer manual for additional programming, and deleting of transmitters information. Preprogrammed Remote Functions 1. Hold until the unit moves • Do not continue to press the button or it will go into “dead man” mode 2. Hop function • Hold button until the unit jumps, continue until it reaches the location that is desired 3. Clone additional remotes (remotes must be identical model) Programming Additional Remotes To do this you must be in range of the opener. 1. Press and hold down the second button on your currently working • &YYMJXFRJYNRJUWJXXFSIMTQIYMJ ܪWXY button together (with the second button) for 3-5 seconds • 9MJ1*)QNLMYTSYMJRTYTW\NQQ ܫFXM 2. Release the two buttons 3. This puts it in learn mode and will remain for 30 seconds 4. Press any button on your new remote to clone it 5. The opener light will remain steady 6. Second remote is programmed Homelink Note: While programming homelink to the vehicle it will go through a learn cycle at least 3-4 times. • Not compatible with car2u • Homelink is on a 310 frequency • -TRJQNSP\NQQGJNSXYFQQJINSYTYMJ ܪWXYKTZW prongs on the USART Please see below diagram (Red arrow is showing the location of USART) Note: Homelink installation video is available on YouTube. Just search “HomeLink training for Sommer garage door openers”. Homelink Programming 1. +TWYMJ ܪWXYYNRJUWTLWFRRNSLUWJXXFSIMTQI all 3 Homelink buttons for 30 seconds 2. Release only when the homelink indicator light turns off 3. To ensure Homelink is in training mode press and hold each of the buttons individually 4. Indicator light blinks rapidly for 2 seconds and then turns to continuous light 5. At the carriage locate the radio button After Autoset Completion Battery Pack (ACCU) Installation The battery pack is optional except for California residents. If the battery back has not been installed yet start at step 1, if it is installed start at step 5. Page 26 &HHJXXTWNJX 2FNSYJSFSHJFSI(FWJ Page 27 • Integrated web server • Universal for smartphones/tablet/laptop • Talks to the opener via radio signal • Opener needs to be on channel 1 • Diagnostic help: full history and codes with possible solutions •Data backup • Generation, backup and loading of own user UWT ܪQJXTSYTYMJIWN[J • Can program features like humidity venting, power, sensitivity, speed, and lighting. • 7JHTRRJSIJIYTTSQ^GJZXJIG^VZFQN ܪJI installers or technicians SENSO Senso is an add on device that monitors humidity levels in the space. There is a standard factory setting for humidity levels that allows for venting if the humidity rises. The opener will be equipped to open about an inch or less if the humidity reaches 80% and will close again once it goes down to 70%. This setting can be adjusted with our SOMlink device. For additional information please contact us directly at 800-694- 5977. Outdoor Keypad Activation Keypad 1. Press and hold the [M] button for about 8 seconds • Both red and amber LED lights will light up for about 2 seconds Note:9MJQT\JWFRGJWQNLMY\NQQ ܫFXM until the upper red light comes on. The keypad is not activated until the red LED illuminates. Programming Access Code 1. Press the [P] button 2. 5WJXXYMJ ܪWXYGZYYTSTK^TZW access code 3. Press the [P] button 4. Enter entire access code 5. Press the [P] button againt to complete Programming the Keypad to the Opener 1. Press the learn button on control unit housing once (solid LED) 2. Enter access code immediately on keypad Changing Access Code 1. Press [P] button 2. Enter existing access code 3. Press [P] button 4. *SYJWFSJ\FHHJXXHTIJYMFYZXJXYMJ ܪWXY XFRJ ܪWXYINLNY QTSLJWNX40 5. Press [P] to complete Erase Access 1. Press [M] button 2. Press [P] button 6. Press and release the radio button 7. LED light is activated 8. Return the Page 28 2FNSYJSFSHJFSI(FWJ 2FNSYJSFSHJFSI(FWJ Page 29 How Often? What? How? As needed Cleaning ceiling control unit and carriage housing See below cleaning instructions Cleaning 1. Clean track, carriage and control unit housing • Pull the power plug out of the outlet. If a battery pack has been installed, remove the control unit housing cover and disconnect the battery pack. Check that the power is disconnected. 2. Remove the loose dirt with moist, lint-free cloth • From the carriage and the control unit housing • From the track and the inside of the track 3. If applicable install the battery pack in reverse order of removal Cleaning Photo Eyes 1. (QJFSYMJMTZXNSLWJ ܫJHYTWX\NYMFRTNXYQNSY free cloth About Real Carriage Door Us & Sliding Hardware is committed to excellence in creating high quality products for customers around the world. Built Real in the USA, our original door and hardware designs are visually stunning and structurally robust. We strive to exceed your expectations by combining personalized customer service with the highest quality products. We invite you to Build Real.TM Real is constantly releasing new, innovative, and exclusive products. We always have great things in the works, so swing by our website to stay completely up to date on everything we have to offer. Order Today To order please call us at 800.694.5977. Our J]UJWNJSHJIIJXNLSJWXFWJWJFI^YTMJQU^TZ ܪSI the perfect doors and hardware for your project’s needs. Order your Real Carriage doors and hardware today! P 800.694.5977 F 253.857.9295 www.realslidinghardware.com info@realslidinghardware.com www.realcarriagedoors.com info@realcarriagedoors.com Real Carriage Door & Sliding Hardware 9803 44th Ave NW Gig Harbor, WA 98332 3. Enter 9 digit reset code 4. Press [M] button 5. Press [P] button 6. The red and amber LED lights will illuminate for 2 seconds and all codes are cleared Note: It is important to keep the reset code sticker which includes the 9 digit reset code • 9MJ^PJ^UFI\NQQYWFSXRNYYMJ ܪWXYINLNYHTNIJ from the original code to the opener Please visit our website and download our most up to date manual. Call us directly at 1(800)694-5977 for additional assistance. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 163 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 164 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 165 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 166 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 167 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 168 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 169 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 170 Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-1 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Product Selection Guide Size and Performance Data .............................................................................................................PFCM-2 Sound Transmission Class and Outdoor-Indoor Transmission Class .........................................PFCM-2 Features and Options .......................................................................................................................PFCM-3 Glazing Performance .................................................................................................................................PFCM-4 Grilles ...........................................................................................................................................................PFCM-8 Size Guidelines ...........................................................................................................................................PFCM-9 Design Data ..............................................................................................................................................PFCM-10 Detailed Product Descriptions Clad ..................................................................................................................................................PFCM-11 Wood ................................................................................................................................................PFCM-12 Unit Sections / Installation Details Clad ..................................................................................................................................................PFCM-13 Wood ................................................................................................................................................PFCM-14 The information published in this document is believed to be accurate at the time of publication. However, because we are constantly working to improve our products, specifications are subject to change without notice. Consult your local Pella representative for up-to-date product information. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 171 Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-2 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window (1) Maximum performance for single unit when glazed with the appropriate glass thickness. See Design Data pages in this section for specific product performance class and grade values. (2) The higher the value, the greater the product's ability to resist forced entry. (3) Glazing configurations may result in higher operational forces. (4) ASTM E 1425 defines standard sizes for acoustical testing. Ratings achieved at that size are representative of all sizes of the same configuration. Clad Wood Sizes Made to order in 1/4" increments zz Standard sizes zz Performance 1 Meets or exceeds AAMA / WDMA Ratings C-R50 - CW50 Hallmark Certified C-R50 - CW50 Hallmark Certified Air Infiltration (cfm / ft 2 of frame @ 1.57 psf wind pressure) 0.05 0.05 Water Resistance 7.5 psf 7.5 psf Design Pressure 50 psf 50 psf Other Performance criteria Forced Entry Resistance Level (Minimum Security Grade) 2 10 10 Operating Force (lb) Initiate Motion / Maintain Motion (of Hallmark tested size and glazing) 3 15/6 15/6 All vent sizes are available with left- or right-hand hinging, as viewed from the exterior. Left Right Sound Transmission class / outdoor-indoor transmission class Product Frame Size Tested 4 Glazing System STC Rating OITC Overall Rating Glazing Thickness Exterior Glass Thickness Interior Glass Thickness Third Pane Thickness Precision Fit Casement VENT 23-1/2" x 59" 11/16" 3.0 mm 3.0 mm — 30 25 Fixed 47-1/4" x 59" 11/16" 3.0 mm 3.0 mm — 27 24 Size and Performance Data ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 172 Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-3 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window (1) Contact your local Pella sales representative for current designs and color options. (2) Available with Low-E argon-insulated glass only. (3) Unit height determines availability. Standard Options / Upgrades Glazing Glazing Type Dual-Pane Insulating Glass — Insulated Glass Options/Low-E Types Advanced Low-E SunDefense™ Low-E AdvancedComfort Low-E NaturalSun Low-E Clear (no Low-E coating) Additional Glass Options Annealed Glass Tempered Glass Obscure Glass 1 Tinted Glass (Bronze, Gray and Green) Gas Fill/High Altitude Argon High altitude High Altitude with Argon 2 Wood types Pine — Exterior 1 EnduraClad® protective finish EnduraClad Plus protective finish Primed Wood Sash (pine, Aluminum-clad frame) Cladding Colors 1 27 Standard colors Custom Colors Interior Unfinished Wood Factory primed, Factory prefinished paint, Factory prefinished stain Hardware Hardware Finish Champagne, White, Brown or Matte Black Bright Brass, Satin Nickel, Oil-Rubbed Bronze, Antique Brass, Distressed Bronze, Distressed Nickel Sash Locks SureLock® System, Unison Lock System 3 — Grilles Integral Light Technology® Grilles — Traditional, Prairie, Top Row, Cross, Custom Roomside Removable Grilles — Traditional, Prairie, Custom Grilles-Between-the-Glass — Traditional, Prairie, Top Row 1, Cross or Custom-Equally Divided Screens — InView™ screens, Vivid View® screens Features and Options ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 173 Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-4 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Climate Zones (1) Glazing performance values are calculated for Pine using NFRC 100, NFRC 200 and NFRC 500. Thermal performance of other wood species may vary. ENERGY STAR® values are updated to 2016 (Version 6) criteria. (2) The values shown are based on Canada's updated ENERGY STAR® 2015 initiative. Based on unit size, some products will use 2.5 mm glass that will have equivalent or improved performance from what is shown. See the Product Performance section for more detailed information or visit www.energystar.gov for Energy Star guidelines. R-Value = 1/U-Factor SHGC = Solar Heat Gain Coefficient VLT % = Visible Light Transmission CR = Condensation Resistance ER = Canadian Energy Rating Glazing Thickness Type of Glazing NFRC Certified Product # Glass (mm) Gap Fill Performance Values 1 Shaded Areas Meet ENERGY STAR® Performance Criteria in Zones Shown Ext. Int. U-Factor SHGC VLT CR U. S. Canada 2 Zone ER Zone Vent - Aluminum-Clad Exterior N NC SCS 123 11/16" Clear IG PEL-N-167-01116-00001 3 3 air 0.47 0.54 0.56 44 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-167-01117-00001 0.47 0.49 0.51 44 with integral grilles PEL-N-167-01118-00001 0.47 0.49 0.51 44 11/16" Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-167-01028-00001 3 3 argon 0.31 0.26 0.48 61 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-167-01029-00001 0.31 0.24 0.43 61 with integral grilles PEL-N-167-01030-00001 0.32 0.24 0.43 61 11/16" SunDefense™ Low-E IG PEL-N-167-01032-00001 3 3 argon 0.31 0.19 0.44 61 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-167-01033-00001 0.31 0.18 0.40 61 with integral grilles PEL-N-167-01034-00001 0.31 0.18 0.40 61 11/16" AdvancedComfort Low-E IG PEL-N-167-01036-00001 3 3 argon 0.28 0.25 0.47 48 19 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-167-01037-00001 0.28 0.23 0.42 48 18 with integral grilles PEL-N-167-01038-00001 0.28 0.23 0.42 48 18 11/16" NaturalSun Low-E IG PEL-N-167-01024-00001 3 3 argon 0.32 0.47 0.54 60 27 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-167-01025-00001 0.32 0.43 0.49 60 25 with integral grilles PEL-N-167-01026-00001 0.33 0.43 0.49 60 Tinted Glazing 11/16" Bronze Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-167-01072-00001 5 3 argon 0.32 0.23 0.31 60 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-167-01073-00001 0.33 0.21 0.28 60 with integral grilles PEL-N-167-01074-00001 0.33 0.21 0.28 60 11/16" Gray Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-167-01076-00001 5 3 argon 0.32 0.21 0.27 60 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-167-01077-00001 0.33 0.19 0.24 60 with integral grilles PEL-N-167-01078-00001 0.33 0.19 0.24 60 11/16" Green Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-167-01080-00001 5 3 argon 0.32 0.26 0.42 60 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-167-01081-00001 0.33 0.24 0.38 60 with integral grilles PEL-N-167-01082-00001 0.33 0.24 0.38 60 High Altitude Glazing 11/16" Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-167-01124-00001 3 3 air 0.34 0.26 0.48 57 Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-5 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Climate Zones (1) Glazing performance values are calculated for Pine using NFRC 100, NFRC 200 and NFRC 500. Thermal performance of other wood species may vary. ENERGY STAR® values are updated to 2016 (Version 6) criteria. (2) The values shown are based on Canada's updated ENERGY STAR® 2015 initiative. Based on unit size, some products will use 2.5 mm glass that will have equivalent or improved performance from what is shown. See the Product Performance section for more detailed information or visit www.energystar.gov for Energy Star guidelines. R-Value = 1/U-Factor SHGC = Solar Heat Gain Coefficient VLT % = Visible Light Transmission CR = Condensation Resistance ER = Canadian Energy Rating Glazing Thickness Type of Glazing NFRC Certified Product # Glass (mm) Gap Fill Performance Values 1 Shaded Areas Meet ENERGY STAR® Performance Criteria in Zones Shown Ext. Int. U-Factor SHGC VLT CR U. S. Canada 2 Zone ER Zone Fixed - Aluminum-Clad Exterior N NC SCS 123 11/16" Clear IG PEL-N-168-01116-00001 3 3 air 0.47 0.62 0.65 44 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-168-01117-00001 0.47 0.56 0.58 44 with integral grilles PEL-N-168-01118-00001 0.48 0.56 0.58 44 11/16" Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-168-01028-00001 3 3 argon 0.29 0.30 0.55 60 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-168-01029-00001 0.29 0.27 0.50 60 with integral grilles PEL-N-168-01030-00001 0.30 0.27 0.50 60 11/16" SunDefense™ Low-E IG PEL-N-168-01032-00001 3 3 argon 0.28 0.22 0.51 60 18 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-168-01033-00001 0.28 0.20 0.46 60 17 with integral grilles PEL-N-168-01034-00001 0.29 0.20 0.46 60 11/16" AdvancedComfort Low-E IG PEL-N-168-01036-00001 3 3 argon 0.25 0.29 0.54 47 25 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-168-01037-00001 0.25 0.26 0.48 47 24 with integral grilles PEL-N-168-01038-00001 0.26 0.26 0.48 47 22 11/16" NaturalSun Low-E IG PEL-N-168-01024-00001 3 3 argon 0.30 0.55 0.63 60 34 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-168-01025-00001 0.30 0.49 0.56 60 31 with integral grilles PEL-N-168-01026-00001 0.31 0.49 0.56 60 30 Tinted Glazing 11/16" Bronze Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-168-01072-00001 5 3 argon 0.29 0.26 0.36 59 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-168-01073-00001 0.31 0.24 0.32 59 with integral grilles PEL-N-168-01074-00001 0.31 0.24 0.32 59 11/16" Gray Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-168-01076-00001 5 3 argon 0.29 0.24 0.31 59 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-168-01077-00001 0.31 0.22 0.28 59 with integral grilles PEL-N-168-01078-00001 0.31 0.22 0.28 59 11/16" Green Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-168-01080-00001 5 3 argon 0.29 0.30 0.49 59 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-168-01081-00001 0.31 0.27 0.44 59 with integral grilles PEL-N-168-01082-00001 0.31 0.27 0.44 59 High Altitude Glazing 11/16" Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-168-01124-00001 3 3 air 0.33 0.30 0.55 56 Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-6 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Glazing Thickness Type of Glazing NFRC Certified Product # Glass (mm) Gap Fill Performance Values 1 Shaded Areas Meet ENERGY STAR® Performance Criteria in Zones Shown Ext. Int. U-Factor SHGC VLT CR U. S. Canada 2 Zone ER Zone Vent - Wood Exterior Sash N NC SCS 123 11/16" Clear IG PEL-N-162-01116-00001 3 3 air 0.46 0.54 0.56 44 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-162-01117-00001 0.46 0.49 0.51 44 with integral grilles PEL-N-162-01118-00001 0.47 0.49 0.51 44 11/16" Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-162-01028-00001 3 3 argon 0.31 0.26 0.48 61 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-162-01029-00001 0.31 0.24 0.43 61 with integral grilles PEL-N-162-01030-00001 0.31 0.24 0.43 61 11/16" SunDefense™ Low-E IG PEL-N-162-01032-00001 3 3 argon 0.30 0.19 0.44 61 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-162-01033-00001 0.30 0.18 0.40 61 with integral grilles PEL-N-162-01034-00001 0.31 0.18 0.40 61 11/16" AdvancedComfort Low-E IG PEL-N-162-01036-00001 3 3 argon 0.27 0.25 0.47 48 21 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-162-01037-00001 0.27 0.23 0.42 48 20 with integral grilles PEL-N-162-01038-00001 0.28 0.23 0.42 48 18 11/16" NaturalSun Low-E IG PEL-N-162-01024-00001 3 3 argon 0.32 0.47 0.54 60 27 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-162-01025-00001 0.32 0.43 0.49 60 25 with integral grilles PEL-N-162-01026-00001 0.32 0.43 0.49 60 25 Tinted Glazing 11/16" Bronze Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-162-01072-00001 5 3 argon 0.31 0.23 0.31 60 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-162-01073-00001 0.32 0.21 0.28 60 with integral grilles PEL-N-162-01074-00001 0.33 0.21 0.28 60 11/16" Gray Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-162-01076-00001 5 3 argon 0.31 0.21 0.27 60 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-162-01077-00001 0.32 0.19 0.24 60 with integral grilles PEL-N-162-01078-00001 0.33 0.19 0.24 60 11/16" Green Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-162-01080-00001 5 3 argon 0.31 0.26 0.42 60 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-162-01081-00001 0.32 0.24 0.38 60 with integral grilles PEL-N-162-01082-00001 0.33 0.24 0.38 60 High Altitude Glazing 11/16" Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-162-01124-00001 3 3 air 0.34 0.26 0.48 57 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-162-01125-00001 0.34 0.24 0.43 57 with integral grilles PEL-N-162-01126-00001 0.35 0.24 0.43 57 11/16" SunDefense Low-E IG PEL-N-162-01128-00001 3 3 air 0.34 0.20 0.44 58 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-162-01129-00001 0.34 0.18 0.40 58 with integral grilles PEL-N-162-01130-00001 0.34 0.18 0.40 58 11/16" AdvancedComfort Low-E IG PEL-N-162-01132-00001 3 3 air 0.30 0.25 0.47 44 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-162-01133-00001 0.30 0.23 0.42 44 with integral grilles PEL-N-162-01134-00001 0.31 0.23 0.42 44 11/16" NaturalSun Low-E IG PEL-N-162-01120-00001 3 3 air 0.35 0.47 0.54 56 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-162-01121-00001 0.35 0.43 0.49 56 with integral grilles PEL-N-162-01122-00001 0.36 0.43 0.49 57 Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-7 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Glazing Thickness Type of Glazing NFRC Certified Product # Glass (mm) Gap Fill Performance Values 1 Shaded Areas Meet ENERGY STAR® Performance Criteria in Zones Shown Ext. Int. U-Factor SHGC VLT CR U. S. Canada 2 Zone ER Zone Fixed - Wood Exterior Sash N NC SCS 123 11/16" Clear IG PEL-N-163-01308-00001 3 3 air 0.47 0.62 0.65 44 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-163-01309-00001 0.47 0.56 0.58 44 with integral grilles PEL-N-163-01310-00001 0.47 0.56 0.58 44 11/16" Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-163-01220-00001 3 3 argon 0.29 0.30 0.56 60 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-163-01221-00001 0.29 0.27 0.50 60 with integral grilles PEL-N-163-01222-00001 0.29 0.27 0.50 60 11/16" SunDefense™ Low-E IG PEL-N-163-01224-00001 3 3 argon 0.28 0.22 0.51 61 18 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-163-01225-00001 0.28 0.20 0.46 61 17 with integral grilles PEL-N-163-01226-00001 0.29 0.20 0.46 61 11/16" AdvancedComfort Low-E IG PEL-N-163-01228-00001 3 3 argon 0.25 0.29 0.54 48 25 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-163-01229-00001 0.25 0.26 0.48 48 24 with integral grilles PEL-N-163-01230-00001 0.25 0.26 0.48 48 24 11/16" NaturalSun Low-E IG PEL-N-163-01216-00001 3 3 argon 0.30 0.55 0.63 60 34 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-163-01217-00001 0.30 0.49 0.56 60 31 with integral grilles PEL-N-163-01218-00001 0.30 0.49 0.56 60 31 Tinted Glazing 11/16" Bronze Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-163-01264-00001 5 3 argon 0.29 0.26 0.36 60 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-163-01265-00001 0.31 0.24 0.32 60 with integral grilles PEL-N-163-01266-00001 0.31 0.24 0.32 60 11/16" Gray Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-163-01268-00001 5 3 argon 0.29 0.24 0.31 60 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-163-01269-00001 0.31 0.22 0.28 60 with integral grilles PEL-N-163-01270-00001 0.31 0.22 0.28 60 11/16" Green Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-163-01272-00001 5 3 argon 0.29 0.30 0.49 60 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-163-01273-00001 0.31 0.27 0.44 60 with integral grilles PEL-N-163-01274-00001 0.31 0.27 0.44 60 High Altitude Glazing 11/16" Advanced Low-E IG PEL-N-163-01316-00001 3 3 air 0.32 0.30 0.56 56 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-163-01317-00001 0.32 0.27 0.50 56 with integral grilles PEL-N-163-01318-00001 0.33 0.27 0.50 56 11/16" SunDefense Low-E IG PEL-N-163-01320-00001 3 3 air 0.32 0.23 0.51 57 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-163-01321-00001 0.32 0.20 0.46 57 with integral grilles PEL-N-163-01322-00001 0.33 0.20 0.46 56 11/16" AdvancedComfort Low-E IG PEL-N-163-01324-00001 3 3 air 0.28 0.29 0.54 44 22 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-163-01325-00001 0.28 0.26 0.48 44 20 with integral grilles PEL-N-163-01326-00001 0.28 0.26 0.48 44 20 11/16" NaturalSun Low-E IG PEL-N-163-01312-00001 3 3 air 0.33 0.54 0.63 56 30 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-163-01313-00001 0.33 0.49 0.56 56 27 with integral grilles PEL-N-163-01314-00001 0.34 0.49 0.56 56 26 Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-8 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window VG = Visible Glass Lite dimensions noted can vary. For size and pattern availability contact your local Pella sales representative. For traditional patterns, see size tables. Grille Patterns Prairie Lite Patterns Size range availability is for 3/4", 7/8" and 1-1/4" grille width. Standard corner lite dimension for Prairie patterns = 2-1/2" VG. 9-Lite - Available in all standard and special sizes. 12-Lite - Available in units ≥ 1'9" and ≤ 2'11" in width, and ≥ 1'9" in height. 14-Lite - Available in units ≥ 1'9" in width and ≥ 2'11" in height . Other Patterns Cross - Available for units with frame heights ≥35". Standard visible glass to separator bar = 1/4 of total visible glass height. Top Row - Standard visible glass to separator bar = 14" for frame heights >35". - Standard visible glass to separator bar = 21" for 35" frame heights and optional for 41" frame height. Separator bar at 12" or 16" optional for frame heights >41". Grilles 11/16" Wood Exterior - Wood Interior Putty Glaze and Ogee Grilles 5/8" 7/8" 1 1/4" Clad Exterior - Wood Interior Putty Glaze and Ogee Grilles 5/8" 7/8" 1 1/4" Removable Interior Pine Grilles Grilles-Between-the-Glass Integral Light Technology® Grilles Clad Exterior - Wood Interior Ogee Grilles 7/8" 1 1/4" 3/4" Contoured Grille 3/4" Regular 3/4" ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 178 Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-9 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Existing Jamb Existing Jamb Existing Head EXTERIOR EXTERIOR INTERIOR INTERIOR Measure Height Measure Width Existing Sill A B Measurement Guidelines Architect Series® Make Dimension Minimum Maximum VENT 17" W x 17" H (432 x 432) 35" W x 73" H (889 x 1 854) FIXED 17" W x 17" H (432 x 432) 59" W x 73" H (1 499 x 1 854) Make Width (MW) = A – 1/2" (rounded to the nearest 1/4") Make Height (MH) = B – 1/2" (rounded to the nearest 1/4") Glass Formulas Visible Glass Width = MW – 5-3/4" Height = MH – 5-3/4" Actual Glass Width = MW – 4-3/8" Height = MH – 4-3/8" Clear Opening Height Frame Height - 4-1/8" Clear Opening Width Hinge Frame Width Formula Standard FW ≥ 29" and ≤ 30-1/2" FW - 9" Standard FW > 30-1/2" FW - 9-3/4" Side Pivot FW ≥ 25" and ≤ 35" FW - 4-3/8" Size Guidelines ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 179 Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-10 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window HEIGHT CLEAR OPENING hardware w/ side pivot WIDTH OPENING CLEAR WIDTH OPENING CLEAR hardware w/ standard WIDTH OPENING CLEAR VENT AREA 29.5" units. clear opening on Sash position for 35" 73" 17" 59" 17" 17" 17" 73" MAX. SIZE MIN. SIZE MAX. SIZE MIN. SIZE Frame width cannot exceed frame height on vent units. Vent Fixed Make Width = Opening width - 1/2" (rounded to the nearest 1/4") Make Height = Opening width - 1/2" (rounded to the nearest 1/4") Special Sizes R35 / R50–Vent | CW35 / CW50–Fixed R40 / R50–Vent | CW40 / CW50–Fixed R45 / R50–Vent | CW45 / CW50–Fixed R50–Vent | CW50–Fixed T Tempered glass required F Fixed units only 73 T E Vent and Fixed 71.5 T T E E E 65.5 E E E 61.5 E E E 59.5 E E E 57.5 E E E 53.5 E E E 51.5 E E E 47.5 E E E 45.5 E E E Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-11 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Frame • Select softwood, immersion treated with Pella’s EnduraGuard® wood protection formula in accordance with WDMA I.S.-4. The EnduraGuard formula includes three active ingredients for protection against the effects of moisture, decay, stains from mold and mildew. Plus, an additional ingredient adds protection against termite damage. • Interior exposed surfaces are clear pine. • Exterior surfaces are clad with aluminum. • Components are assembled with screws, staples and concealed corner locks. • Pocket depth is 3-1/4" (83mm). Sash • Select softwood, immersion treated with Pella’s EnduraGuard® wood protection formula in accordance with WDMA I.S.-4. The EnduraGuard formula includes three active ingredients for protection against the effects of moisture, decay, stains from mold and mildew. Plus, an additional ingredient adds protection against termite damage. • Interior exposed surfaces are clear pine. • Exterior surfaces are clad with aluminum, lap-jointed and sealed. • Corners mortised and tenoned, glued and secured with metal fasteners. • Sash thickness is [1-13/16" (46mm). Weatherstripping • Dual weatherstripping. ƒ Flexible santoprene material compressed between frame and sash for positive seal on all four sides. ƒ Secondary thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV) leaf-type weatherstrip between edge of sash and frame. Glazing System 1 • Quality float glass complying with ASTM C 1036. • Custom and high altitude [with argon] glazing available for 11/16" glazing only. • Silicone-glazed 11/16" dual-seal insulating glass [[annealed] [tempered]] [[clear] [[Advanced Low-E] [SunDefense™ Low-E] [NaturalSun Low-E] [AdvancedComfort Low-E] with argon]] [[bronze] [gray] [green] Advanced Low-E with argon]]. Exterior • Aluminum clad exteriors shall be finished with EnduraClad® protective finish, in a multi-step, baked-on finish. ƒ Color is [standard] [custom]2. – or – • Aluminum clad exteriors shall be finished with EnduraClad Plus protective finish with 70% fluoropolymer resin in a multi-step, baked-on finish. ƒ Color is [standard] [custom]2. Interior • [Unfinished, ready for site finishing] [factory primed with one coat acrylic latex] [factory prefinished [paint] [stain] 2]. Hardware • Roto operator assembly ƒ Steel worm gear sash operator with hardened gears. ƒ Operator base is zinc die cast with painted finish. ƒ Operator linkage, hinge slide, and hinge arms are stainless steel. ƒ Exposed fasteners are stainless steel. ƒ Hardware shall exceed 1,000 hours salt spray exposure per ASTM B 117. • All vent units are available with left- or right-hand hinging. • SureLock® System—A single handle locking system operates positive-acting arms that reach out and pull the sash into a locked position: one operating lock installed on units with make height 29" or less, two unison operating locks installed on units with make height over 29". • Style of hardware is standard integrated fold-away crank and standard lock Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-12 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Frame • Select softwood, immersion treated with Pella’s EnduraGuard® wood protection formula in accordance with WDMA I.S.-4. The EnduraGuard formula includes three active ingredients for protection against the effects of moisture, decay, stains from mold and mildew. Plus, an additional ingredient adds protection against termite damage. • Interior exposed surfaces are pine. • Exterior surfaces are clad with aluminum. • Pocket depth is 3-1/4" (83mm). Sash • Select softwood, immersion treated with Pella’s EnduraGuard® wood protection formula in accordance with WDMA I.S.-4. The EnduraGuard formula includes three active ingredients for protection against the effects of moisture, decay, stains from mold and mildew. Plus, an additional ingredient adds protection against termite damage. • Interior exposed surfaces are pine. • Exterior surfaces are pine: primed. • Corners mortised and tenoned, glued and secured with metal fasteners. • Sash thickness is 1-13/16" (46mm). Weatherstripping • Dual weatherstripping. ƒ Flexible santoprene material compressed between frame and sash for positive seal on all four sides. ƒ Secondary thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV)leaf-type weatherstrip between edge of sash and frame. Glazing System 1 • Quality float glass complying with ASTM C 1036. • Silicone-glazed 11/16" dual-seal insulating glass [[annealed] [tempered]] [[clear] [Advanced Low-E with argon] [SunDefense™ Low-E with argon] [AdvancedComfort Low-E with argon] [NaturalSun Low-E with argon]] [[bronze] [gray] [green] Advanced Low-E with argon]]. • Custom and high altitude [with argon] glazing available. Interior • [Unfinished, ready for site finishing] [factory primed with one coat acrylic latex] [factory prefinished [paint] [stain]3]. Hardware • Roto operator assembly ƒ Steel worm gear sash operator with hardened gears. ƒ Operator base is zinc die cast with painted finish. ƒ Operator linkage, hinge slide, and hinge arms are stainless steel. ƒ Exposed fasteners are stainless steel. ƒ Hardware will exceed 1,000 hours salt spray exposure per ASTM B 117. • All vent units are available with left- or right-hand hinging. • SureLock® System—A single handle locking system operates positive-acting arms that reach out and pull the sash into a locked position: one operating lock installed on units with make height 29" or less, two unison operating locks installed on units with make height over 29". • Style of hardware is [Standard integrated fold-away crank and standard lock handle with [baked enamel [Champagne] [White] [Brown] [Matte Black]] [bright brass] [satin nickel] [oil-rubbed bronze] hardware finish] [Antiek fold-away crank and Antiek lock handle with [baked enamel [Champagne] [White] [Brown] [Matte Black]] [bright brass] [satin nickel] [oil-rubbed bronze] [antique brass] [distressed bronze] [distressed nickel] hardware finish]. Optional Products Grilles • Integral Light Technology® grilles Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-13 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Scale 3" = 1' 0" All dimensions are approximate. MAKE HEIGHT [83] 3 1/4" MAKE HEIGHT [14] 9/16" [14] 9/16" [101] 4" [48] 1 7/8" [11] 7/16" [48] 1 7/8" [11] 7/16" [48] 1 7/8" [12] 7/16" [48] 1 7/8" [59] 2 5/16" [48] 1 7/8" [59] 2 5/16" [48] 1 7/8" MAKE WIDTH [14] 9/16" [59] 2 5/16" [83] 3 1/4" [19] 3/4" [19] 3/4" [83] 3 1/4" [14] 9/16" MAKE WIDTH [83] 3 1/4" [19] 3/4" [19] 3/4" [83] Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-14 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Scale 3" = 1' 0" All dimensions are approximate. MAKE HEIGHT [83] 3 1/4" MAKE HEIGHT [14] 9/16" [14] 9/16" [101] 4" [47] 1 7/8" [11] 7/16" [47] 1 7/8" [11] 7/16" [46] 1 13/16" [12] 1/2" [46] 1 13/16" [58] 2 5/16" [47] 1 7/8" [58] 2 5/16" [46] 1 13/16" MAKE WIDTH [14] 9/16" [58] 2 5/16" [83] 3 1/4" [19] 3/4" [19] 3/4" [83] 3 1/4" [14] 9/16" MAKE WIDTH [83] 3 1/4" [19] 3/4" [19] 3/4" [83] Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-15 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Scale 3" = 1' 0" All dimensions are approximate. INSULATE ALL VOIDS AT WINDOW PERIMETER (BY OTHERS). SEAL UNIT TO EXTERIOR / BLIND STOP. NOTE: WALL CONSTRUCTION AND OLD DOUBLE-HUNG FRAME SHOWN ARE EXISTING; OLD DOUBLE-HUNG SASH HAS BEEN REMOVED. REFER TO THE APPROPRIATE PELLA INSTALLATION INSTRUCTION FOR COMPLETE STEP BY STEP INSTRUCTIONS. SHIM AND PLUMB UNITS AS REQUIRED. SEAL UNIT TO EXTERIOR / BLIND STOP. SEAL THE UNIT TO EXISTING STOOL AND WINDOW SILL. [6] 1/4" MAKE HEIGHT [6] MAKE HEIGHT 1/4" [6] 1/4" MAKE WIDTH JAMB SILL HEAD Installation Details - Aluminum-Clad Exterior Rev. 09/13/2019 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 185 Pella 2019 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.PellaADM.com PFCM-16 Architect Series® Traditional Precision-Fit Casement Window Scale 3" = 1' 0" All dimensions are approximate. [6] 1/4" MAKE HEIGHT [6] MAKE HEIGHT 1/4" [6] 1/4" MAKE WIDTH JAMB SILL HEAD INSULATE ALL VOIDS AT WINDOW PERIMETER (BY OTHERS). SEAL UNIT TO EXTERIOR / BLIND STOP. NOTE: WALL CONSTRUCTION AND OLD DOUBLE-HUNG FRAME SHOWN ARE EXISTING; OLD DOUBLE-HUNG SASH HAS BEEN REMOVED. REFER TO THE APPROPRIATE PELLA INSTALLATION INSTRUCTION FOR COMPLETE STEP BY STEP INSTRUCTIONS. SHIM AND PLUMB UNITS AS REQUIRED. SEAL UNIT TO EXTERIOR / BLIND STOP. SEAL THE UNIT TO EXISTING STOOL AND WINDOW SILL. Installation Details - Wood Exterior Sash Rev. 09/13/2019 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 186 Revised 08-2014 Page 1 Fort Collins Landmark Designation LOCATION INFORMATION: Address: 714 West Mountain Avenue Legal Description: Lot 33, Block 281, Loomis Amended, City of Fort Collins Property Name (historic and/or common): The Ault/Thode Property OWNER INFORMATION: Name: Henry Thode III Phone: 970-635-9972 Email: pairadox01@gmail.com Address: P.O. Box 7235, Loveland, CO, 80537 CLASSIFICATION Category Ownership Status Present Use Existing Designation Building Public Occupied Commercial Nat’l Register Structure Private Unoccupied Educational State Register Site Religious Object Residential District Entertainment Government Other FORM PREPARED BY: Name and Title: Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planning Intern Address: City of Fort Collins, Historic Preservation Department, P.O. Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522 Phone: 828-499-1235 Email: cbumgarner@fcgov.com Relationship to Owner: None. DATE: May 27, 2015 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.41 0 970.22 4- fax fcgov.c ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 187 Revised 08-2014 Page 2 TYPE OF DESIGNATION and BOUNDARIES Individual Landmark Property Landmark District Explanation of Boundaries: The boundaries of the property being designated as a Fort Collins Landmark correspond to the legal description of the property, above. SIGNIFICANCE Properties are eligible for designation if they possess significance, which is the importance of a site, structure, object or district to the history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture of our community, State or Nation. For designation as Fort Collins Landmarks or Fort Collins Landmark Districts properties must meet one (1) or more of the following standards: Standard A: Events. This property is associated with events that have made a recognizable contribution to the broad patterns of the history of the community, State or Nation. It is associated with either (or both) of these two (2) types of events: 1. A specific event marking an important moment in Fort Collins prehistory or history; and/or 2. A pattern of events or a historic trend that made a recognizable contribution to the development of the community, State or Nation. Standard B: Persons/Groups. This property is associated with the lives of persons or groups of persons recognizable in the history of the community, State or Nation whose specific contributions to that history can be identified and documented. Standard C: Design/Construction. This property embodies the identifiable characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; represents the work of a craftsman or architect whose work is distinguishable from others by its characteristic style and quality; possesses high artistic values or design concepts; or is part of a recognizable and distinguishable group of properties. Standard D: Information potential. This property has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 188 Revised 08-2014 Page 3 EXTERIOR INTEGRITY Properties are eligible for designation if they possess exterior integrity, which is the ability of a site, structure, object or district to be able to convey its significance. The exterior integrity of a resource is based on the degree to which it retains all or some of seven (7) aspects or qualities: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. All seven qualities do not need to be present for a site, structure, object or district to be eligible as long as the overall sense of past time and place is evident. Standard A: Location. This property is located where it was originally constructed or where an historic event occurred. Standard B: Design. This property retains a combination of elements that create its historic form, plan space, structure, and style. Standard C: Setting. This property retains a character and relationship with its surroundings that reflect how and where it was originally situated in relation to its surrounding features and open space. Standard D: Materials. This property retains much of the historic physical elements that originally formed the property. Standard E: Workmanship. This property possesses evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. This consists of evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering the building, structure or site. Standard F: Feeling. This property expresses the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period or time. This results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property's historic character. Standard G: Association. This property retains an association, or serves as a direct link to, an important historic event or person. It retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 189 Revised 08-2014 Page 4 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE and EXTERIOR INTEGRITY (Please describe why the property is significant, relative to the Standard(s) above, and how it possesses exterior integrity.) The Ault/Thode Property at 714 West Mountain Avenue is significant under Fort Collins Landmark Designation Standard C, as a well preserved example of a Foursquare dwelling with Classical Revival detailing. The building retains preponderance of all seven aspects of integrity, A through G. With somewhat limited representation in Fort Collins, Foursquare dwellings were widely constructed throughout much of Colorado after 1900. Foursquare dwellings are easily recognizable for their square plans, two-story height, overall simplicity, and adaptability to a variety of contemporary stylistic treatments. According to History Colorado’s Guide to Historic Architecture and Engineering: “The typical Foursquare is a two-story hipped roof structure with central dormer, minimal decoration, broad overhanging eaves with brackets or modillions, classical frieze with dentils, and a porch, usually full-width with a hipped roof supported by Doric or Tuscan columns or by square posts. Occasionally, a Foursquare will feature a shaped gable or will be considerably larger with more elaborate ornamentation. In each case, the basic square plan is predominant.” Nearly all of these architectural features are represented in the building at 714 West Mountain Avenue, including the two-story square plan, full-width front porch with square columns and pedimented dormer, and hipped roof with decorative brackets in open eaves. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 190 Revised 08-2014 Page 5 HISTORICAL INFORMATION (Please include city directory research and/or a title search if the property is important for its association with a significant person.) On February 13, 1907, writers of the Fort Collins Courier celebrated the completion of Thomas E. Giller’s home, a Colorado and Southern agent, as “another of the substantial improvements being made on that pretty avenue.” 1 Interestingly, the year prior to the completion of Giller’s home, JM Morrison owned the property at 714 West Mountain Avenue. Fort Collins City Directories indicate that Morrison was a carpenter and lived next-door at 718 West Mountain Avenue. Therefore, it is possible that Morrison constructed the residence at 714 West Mountain Avenue and sold it to Giller. Giller’s home had elements of the contemporarily modern and influential Classical Revival stylistic elements in the popular Foursquare form. The Giller family lived in the home for a couple of years until Alexander Ault purchased the home in 1909 and lived there with his wife Aida and family. Alexander was involved in agricultural business in the area, acquiring some notoriety for himself in the community through purchasing a substantial amount of wheat from farmers during a difficult economic time. The town of Ault, east of Fort Collins, was named after Alexander during the first few years of the twentieth century. Taken from the “Ault Advertiser,” on July 10, 1907, The Fort Collins Weekly Courier reported Ault as stating: “The place was named for me without any solicitation on my part, as I had considerable land here and bought all the wheat from farmers when there was only a wagon scale and switch and I had to go a mile and a half for meals and lodgings. I loaded 100 cars of wheat from there from the 15 th of August to the 1 st of November, in the year 1905, but I can now see where I made a great mistake in not staying there a few years longer.” The property sold to Fred W. Stover, a former Fort Collins Mayor, in 1924 from the Alexander Ault estate through and Administrators deed, and was then transferred back to Nelle Ault in 1927. Edson Ault, along with Winton and Nelle Ault, occupied the residence during the time of Stover’s ownership, according to City Directories. Winton was the son of Alexander and lived in his childhood home for 17 years. After the Aults left in 1944, the house was occupied by five different owners over the course of ten years. The owners in order are Paul L. Henry, Edward W. and Roberta H. Withrow, Otis T. and Josephine E. Massey, W. L. and Elsie S. Sybert, and Dr. J. Frank and Lee Hurdle. When W. L. Sybert owned the home, he remodeled the second floor to “move present bathroom to new location over kitchen. Build new fireplace and chimney.” 2 In 1955, Dr. Henry P. Thode Jr. and his wife Mary A. purchased the home. During Thode’s career he partnered with Dr. Frank A. Betts as general family physicians. 3 Thode was the second from Poudre Valley Hospital’s family practice residency program. From 1955 until 2014, he owned the home. In 2014, the home passed on to his son, Henry P. Thode III. Today the home is used as a single family residence. 1 “Local and Personal,” Fort Collins Courier, February 13, 1907, 13. 2 Building Permit No. 12624, City of Fort Collins, April 1, 1952, accessed at http://history.fcgov.com/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/bp&CISOPTR=13786&CISOBOX=1&REC=1. 3 Fort Collins City Directory, 1956, (Loveland, Colorado: Rocky Mountain Directory Co., 1956), 19. Accessed May 18, 2015. http://history.fcgov.com/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/cid&CISOPTR=26694&CISOSHOW=26495&REC=1. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 191 Revised 08-2014 Page 6 ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION Construction Date: February, 1907 Architect/Builder: Unknown Building Materials: Sandstone, wood, and stone. Architectural Style: Foursquare with Classical Revival elements Description: The residence at 714 West Mountain Avenue is constructed in the Foursquare form with a rectangular plan that sits on a narrow, deep lot. The two-story building is clad in horizontal lap siding and covered by an asphalt shingled, flared hipped roof. The roof contains a central flared hipped dormer with centrally placed diamond patterned window. The structure has prominent, overhanging eaves, symmetrical façade, formal porch entry, and sandstone foundation. The symmetrical façade (southern elevation) features a central, fixed window on the second floor, flanked by two one-over-one fixed windows. The top pane in each features a diamond-shaped design similar to that on the dormer. The front porch is enclosed with visible massive square posts. The enclosure is also symmetrical, with the door flanked by a set of two-over-two panes of glass. The porch entry is covered with a pediment and is flanked by two additional massive square posts. On the second story of the western elevation, there is central, fixed pane window flanked by two one-over-one sash windows. The first story of the elevation has a single and pair of one-over-one sash windows. Toward the southwest of the elevation, there is irregular massing with the second story not being full width and the first story having a shed roof. On the secondary story, there is another single pane, fixed window. The first floor has two doors, one with three steps leading up to it and the other level with the ground. Both doors are paneled. The southern elevation features three one-over-one sash windows and a casement window on the first floor. The eastern elevation has five one-over-one sash windows and two fixed, single pane windows. This elevation is not symmetrical. There is another door on this elevation with a small awning. It appears the central one-story element protruding from the building’s rear (northern) elevation is original, as its eave detailing, siding and foundation material are consistent with the main building. There is a second-story addition over this element, along with a shed-roofed one-story addition to the east. No construction information is available for either addition. The additions do not appear to compromise any of the seven aspects of integrity related to the building. There is what appears to be a historic carriage house on the northeast portion of the lot. The building has open eaves with exposed structural elements and is clad in wooden shingles. The building is 1½ stories with a front-gabled roof and nearly full-width set of doors that open out on the southern elevation. A carport element extends from the front, southern elevation. According to building permit records, this was constructed in 1986 and appears to be attached to the building by a ledger board. The eastern elevation of the building is void of openings, while the western elevation contains two nine-light square windows and an awning feature on its southern end. The rear, or northern elevation, ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 192 Revised 08-2014 Page 7 contains a single bay access opening, which is currently covered in wood shingles, in addition to an opening into the second level loft area of the building that is also covered in wood shingles. According to historic Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, the carriage house building was extent as early as 1909. Neither the house, nor the carriage house, is depicted in the 1906 Sanborn map. According to the current property owner, whose family has owned the property since 1955, the carriage house has been clad in wooden shingles for as long as he can remember. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 193 Revised 08-2014 Page 8 REFERENCE LIST or SOURCES of INFORMATION (attach a separate sheet if needed) City of Fort Collins city directories, 1907–2014, City of Fort Collins, Historic Preservation Department, Fort Collins, Colorado. City of Fort Collins building permits, Historic Preservation Department, Fort Collins, Colorado. Fort Collins Courier, “Early Ault,” July 10, 1907 Fort Collins Courier, “Local and Personal,” February 13, 1907 History Colorado Guide to Historic Architecture and Engineering: http://www.historycolorado.org/oahp/foursquare Larimer County Tax Assessor Records. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, 1906-1948. “Sugar Beets, Streetcar Suburbs, and the City Beautiful, 1900-1919.” History Connection. Accessed May 11, 2015. http://history.fcgov.com/archive/contexts/sugar.php. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 194 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 195 N LOOMIS AVE W MOUNTAIN AVE N WHITCOMB ST N GRANT AVE W OAK ST N WASHINGTON AVE LAPORTE AVE 0 100 200 400 714 W 600 Mountain 800 Avenue Ü Feet SITE ITEM ATTACHMENT 5, ATTACHMENT 1 2 Packet Pg. 196 714 West Mountain Avenue - Fort Collins Landmark Designation 714 W. Mountain Avenue South Elevation 714 W. Mountain Avenue Southeast Elevation ATTACHMENT 3 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 197 714 W. Mountain Avenue East Elevation 714 W. Mountain Ave. Southwest Elevation ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 198 714 W. Mountain Avenue Northeast Elevation 714 W. Mountain Ave. North Elevation ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 199 714 W. Mountain Ave. North Elevation ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 200 714 West Mountain Avenue – Garage – Southern Elevation 714 West Mountain Avenue – Garage – Southern Elevation ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 201 714 West Mountain Avenue – Garage – Southern Elevation Back of the garage (north) close up ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 202 Rear of the garage (north) close up Rear of garage (north) ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 203 Front of garage (south) close up Side of garage (west) ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 204 Side of garage (west) close up of window Front of garage (south) close up of door ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 205 1 714 W. Mountain Ave. Carriage House: Design Review Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission, January 15, 2020 714 W. Mountain Ave. – Location Map 2 • Ault/Thode Property (landmarked 2015) • Highlighted Site – c.1909 Carriage House/Garage 1 2 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 206 Historic Resources and Background 3 Criterion 3 (Design/Construction) • Foursquare House (1907) • Carriage House (c. 1909- no building permit; Carport added 1988) • Owners included: • Thomas E. Giller (1907-1909) • Alexander Ault (1909-1924) • Fred W. Stover (1924-1927) • Dr. Henry P. Thode, Jr. and Mary A. Thode (1955-2014) • Henry P. Thode III (2014- present) Tax Assessor Photo (1968) 700 Block Mountain Survey Photo (1988, just prior to carport construction) Garage – Current Photos South Elevation 4 3 4 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 207 Garage – Current Photos West Elevation 5 North and East Elevations 6 Garage – Current Photos North Elevation East Elevation 5 6 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 208 LPC’s Role Design Review [Sec. 14-54(a)]: Review project under the City’s adopted standards and guidelines: • Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation LPC can: • Issue a Certificate of Appropriateness • Deny a Certificate of Appropriateness 7 Applicant’s Priorities • Enclosed garage space for two vehicles, including a truck • Easy-to-open garage door • Garage access from the alley at the rear of the property • Insulation of historic carriage house 8 7 8 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 209 Rehab Historic Carriage House C. Supplement Roof Framing D. Replace Wood Shingle wall cladding E. Alter south (primary garage door opening) and either rehabilitate or replace existing garage doors. F. Reopening of north garage door. G. Re-install new wood casement windows in existing south gable frames H. Re-open north gable end window and install matching casements I. Repair hopper windows on west wall of historic carriage house J. Remove non-historic (c.1988) roof awning Work Items 9 Garage Addition Plans 10 9 10 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 210 Garage Addition Close-up 11 Garage Addition Structural 12 11 12 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 211 Garage Addition Concepts – North and East 13 Garage Addition Concepts – South and West 14 13 14 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 212 Garage Addition New Door option - configuration New Door - Style 15 Garage Addition, Staff Findings of Fact • The work as proposed may comply with Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV. • Clarification needed on historic garage door treatment and specifications on replacement wood shingle cladding. • Specifically, the proposed work needs to confirm that it meets Standards 2, 5, and 6. 16 15 16 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 213 Reminder - LPC’s Role Design Review [Sec. 14-54(a)]: Review project under the City’s adopted standards and guidelines: • Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation LPC can: • Issue a Certificate of Appropriateness • Deny a Certificate of Appropriateness 17 714 W. Mountain Ave.: Design Review 18 Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission, January 15, 2020 17 18 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 214 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 215 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 216 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 217 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 218 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 219 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 220 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 221 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 222 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 223 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 224 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 225 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 226 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 227 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 228 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 229 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 230 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 231 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 232 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 233 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 234 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 235 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 236 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 237 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 238 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 239 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 240 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 241 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 242 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 243 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 244 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 245 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 246 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 247 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 248 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation at Hearing Packet Pg. 249 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT B Engineering Letter Packet Pg. 250 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT C Arborist Letter Packet Pg. 251 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT D Plan of Protection Packet Pg. 252 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT D Plan of Protection Packet Pg. 253 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT D Plan of Protection Packet Pg. 254 3 1/4" [11] 7/16" [46] 1 13/16" [58] 2 5/16" [48] 1 7/8" FIXED VENT FS VH FH FJ VS LJ HJ FJ FIXED JAMB VS VENT SILL FS FIXED SILL FH FIXED HEAD VH VENT HEAD LJ LOCK JAMB HJ HINGE JAMB Unit Section - Wood Exterior Sash Putty Exterior Glazing Profile Rev. 09/13/2019 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 184 3 1/4" [11] 7/16" [48] 1 7/8" [59] 2 5/16" [48] 1 7/8" FIXED VENT FS VH FH LS OJ VJ FJ VS VENT SILL LJ LOCK JAMB HJ HINGE JAMB FS FIXED SILL FH FIXED HEAD FJ FIXED JAMB VH VENT HEAD Unit Section - Aluminum-Clad Exterior Rev. 09/13/2019 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 183 ƒ Interior grilles are [5/8"] [7/8"] [1-1/4"] ogee profile that are solid pine. Interior surfaces are [unfinished, ready for site finishing] [factory primed] [pine: factory prefinished [paint] [stain] 3]. ƒ Exterior grilles are solid [5/8"] [7/8"] [1-1/4"] putty glaze profile that are [pine] [mahogany]. Exterior surfaces are water repellent, preservative- treated in accordance with WDMA I.S.-4, and are [unfinished, ready for site finishing] [factory primed]. ƒ Patterns are [Traditional] [Prairie] [Top Row] [Cross] [New England] ƒ Insulating glass contains non-glare spacer between the panes of glass. ƒ Grilles are adhered to both sides of the insulating glass with VHB acrylic adhesive tape and aligned with the non-glare spacer. – or – • Grilles-Between-the-Glass 2 ƒ Insulating glass contains 3/4" contoured aluminum grilles permanently installed between two panes of glass. ƒ Patterns are [Traditional] [Prairie] [Cross] [Top Row] [Custom – Equally Divided]. ƒ Interior color is [White] [Tan 4] [Brown 4] [Putty 4] [Black] [Morning Sky Gray] [Ivory] [Sand Dune] [Harvest] [Cordovan] [Brickstone]. ƒ Exterior color 5 is [standard 3]. – or – • Removable grilles ƒ 3/4" Regular profile, with [Traditional] [Prairie] patterns that are removable solid pine wood grilles steel-pinned at joints and fitted to sash with steel clips and tacks. ƒ Interior [unfinished, ready for site finishing] [factory primed] [factory prefinished [paint] [stain] 3]. ƒ Exterior [unfinished, ready for site finishing] [Factory primed]. ƒ When the exterior is pine and the interior finish is unfinished then the interior RMB grille is unfinished or prefinished white. If the interior finished is stained then RMB grille stained to match. Screens • InView™ Screens ƒ Vinyl-coated 18/18 mesh fiberglass screen cloth complying with the performance requirements of SMA 1201, set in aluminum frame fitted to inside of window, supplied complete with all necessary hardware. ƒ Insect screen frame finish is [baked enamel [Champagne] [Artisan Greige] [Skyline Gray] [White] [Brown] [Black]] [Wrapped in wood veneer, finished to match interior finish]. – or – • Vivid View® Screens ƒ PVDF 21/17 mesh, minimum 78 percent light transmissive screen, set in aluminum frame fitted to inside of window, supplied complete with all necessary hardware. ƒ Insect screen frame finish is [baked enamel [Champagne] [Artisan Greige] [Skyline Gray] [White] [Brown] [Black]] [Wrapped in wood veneer, finished to match interior finish]. Hardware • Optional factory applied limited opening hardware available for vent units in stainless steel; nominal 3" opening. • Optional factory applied window opening control device. Device allows window to open less than 4" with normal operation, with a release mechanism that allows the sash to open completely. Complies with ASTM F2090-10. (1) Insulating glass with argon is Low-E coated. All other insulating glass is air-filled. (2) Available in clear or Low-E insulating glass with argon, and obscure insulated glass. (3) Contact your local Pella sales representative for current color options. (4) Tan, Brown or Putty Interior GBG colors are available in single-tone (Brown/Brown, Tan/Tan or Putty/Putty). Other interior colors are also available with Tan or Brown exterior. (5) Appearance of exterior grille color will vary depending on Low-E coating on glass. Detailed Product Description - Wood Exterior Sash ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 182 handle with [baked enamel [Champagne] [White] [Brown] [Matte Black]] [bright brass] [satin nickel] [oil-rubbed bronze] hardware finish]. Optional Products Grilles • Integral Light Technology® grilles ƒ Interior grilles are [5/8"] [7/8"] [1-1/4"] ogee profile that are solid pine. Interior surfaces are [unfinished, ready for site finishing] [factory primed] [factory prefinished [paint] [stain] 2]. ƒ Exterior grilles are [5/8" putty glaze profile] [7/8" [putty glaze] [ogee] profile] [1-1/4" [putty glaze] [ogee] profile] that are extruded aluminum. ƒ Patterns are [Traditional] [Prairie] [Top Row] [Cross]. ƒ Insulating glass contains non-glare spacer between the panes of glass. ƒ Grilles are adhered to both sides of the insulating glass with VHB acrylic adhesive tape and aligned with the non-glare spacer. – or – • Grilles-Between-the-Glass 3 ƒ Insulating glass contains 3/4" contoured aluminum grilles permanently installed between two panes of glass. ƒ Patterns are [Traditional] [Prairie] [Cross] [Top Row] [Custom – Equally Divided]. ƒ Interior color is [White] [Tan 4] [Brown 4] [Putty 4] [Black] [Morning Sky Gray] [Ivory] [Sand Dune] [Harvest] [Cordovan] [Brickstone]. ƒ Exterior color 5 is [standard]2 – or – • Roomside Removable grilles ƒ 3/4" Regular profile, with [Traditional] [Prairie] patterns that are removable solid pine wood bars steel-pinned at joints and fitted to sash with steel clips and tacks. ƒ Interior [unfinished, ready for site finishing] [factory primed] [factory prefinished [paint] [stain] 2]. ƒ Exterior [unfinished, ready for site finishing] [Factory primed] [finish color matched to exterior cladding 5]. Screens • InView™ Screens ƒ Vinyl-coated 18/18 mesh fiberglass screen cloth complying with the performance requirements of SMA 1201, set in aluminum frame fitted to inside of window, supplied complete with all necessary hardware. ƒ Insect screen frame finish is [baked enamel [Champagne] [Artisan Greige] [Skyline Gray] [White] [Brown] [Black]] [Wrapped in wood veneer, finished to match interior finish]. – or – • Vivid View® Screens ƒ PVDF 21/17 mesh, minimum 78 percent light transmissive screen, set in aluminum frame fitted to inside of window, supplied complete with all necessary hardware. ƒ Insect screen frame finish is [baked enamel [Champagne] [Artisan Greige] [Skyline Gray] [White] [Brown] [Black]] [Wrapped in wood veneer, finished to match interior finish]. Hardware • Optional factory applied limited opening hardware available for vent units in stainless steel; nominal 3" opening. • Optional window opening control device available for field installation. Device allows window to open less than 4" with normal operation, with a release mechanism that allows the sash to open completely. Complies with ASTM F2090-10. (1) Low-E coated insulating glass is argon-filled (except high altitude). All other insulating glass (including high altitude Low-E) is air-filled. (2) Contact your local Pella sales representative for current designs and color options. (3) Available in clear or Low-E insulating glass with argon, and obscure insulated glass. (4) Tan, Brown and Putty Interior GBG colors are available in single-tone (Brown/Brown, Tan/Tan or Putty/Putty). Other interior colors are also available with Tan or Brown exterior. (5) Appearance of exterior grille color will vary depending on Low-E coating on glass. Detailed Product Description - Aluminum-Clad Exterior ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 181 41.5 E 2 E 2 E 37.5 E 2 E 2 E 35.5 E 3 E 2 E 2 31.5 F 29.5 FF 27.5 FFF 23.5 FFFF 21.5 FFFFF 19.5 FFFFFF 17.5 FFFFFFF 17 FFFFFFFF 17 17.5 19.5 21.5 23.5 27.5 29.5 31.5 35 Standard sizes shown, unless noted otherwise. Sizes are available in 1/4" increments. Frame width cannot exceed frame height on vent sizes. Maximum performance when glazed with the appropriate glass. For special size units, use the performance class and grade for the next larger standard size unit. Second number shown requires Tempered glass Side pivot hardware reduces Performance class to 'R' Fixed Only 73 71.5 65.5 61.5 59.5 57.5 53.5 51.5 47.5 45.5 41.5 37.5 35.5 35.5 39.5 41.5 45.5 47.5 51.5 53.5 57.5 59 Check all applicable local codes for emergency egress requirements. E Meets min. clear opening 24" H x 20" W and 5.7 ft 2 . E 1 Meets min. clear opening 24" H x 20" W and 5.0 ft 2 . E 2 With optional side pivot hardware, meets min. clear opening 24" H x 20" W and 5.7 ft 2 . E 3 With optional side pivot hardware, window meets minimum clear opening of 24" height, 20" width, and 5.0 ft 2 . Make Size Ranges Standard Sizes Design Data ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 180 Glazing Performance - Total Unit Climate Zones (1) Glazing performance values are calculated for Pine using NFRC 100, NFRC 200 and NFRC 500. Thermal performance of other wood species may vary. ENERGY STAR® values are updated to 2016 (Version 6) criteria. (2) The values shown are based on Canada's updated ENERGY STAR® 2015 initiative. Based on unit size, some products will use 2.5 mm glass that will have equivalent or improved performance from what is shown. See the Product Performance section for more detailed information or visit www.energystar.gov for Energy Star guidelines. R-Value = 1/U-Factor SHGC = Solar Heat Gain Coefficient VLT % = Visible Light Transmission CR = Condensation Resistance ER = Canadian Energy Rating ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 177 Glazing Performance - Total Unit Climate Zones (1) Glazing performance values are calculated for Pine using NFRC 100, NFRC 200 and NFRC 500. Thermal performance of other wood species may vary. ENERGY STAR® values are updated to 2016 (Version 6) criteria. (2) The values shown are based on Canada's updated ENERGY STAR® 2015 initiative. Based on unit size, some products will use 2.5 mm glass that will have equivalent or improved performance from what is shown. See the Product Performance section for more detailed information or visit www.energystar.gov for Energy Star guidelines. R-Value = 1/U-Factor SHGC = Solar Heat Gain Coefficient VLT % = Visible Light Transmission CR = Condensation Resistance ER = Canadian Energy Rating ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 176 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-168-01125-00001 0.33 0.27 0.50 56 with integral grilles PEL-N-168-01126-00001 0.34 0.27 0.50 56 11/16" SunDefense Low-E IG PEL-N-168-01128-00001 3 3 air 0.32 0.23 0.51 56 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-168-01129-00001 0.32 0.20 0.46 56 with integral grilles PEL-N-168-01130-00001 0.33 0.20 0.46 56 11/16" AdvancedComfort Low-E IG PEL-N-168-01132-00001 3 3 air 0.28 0.29 0.54 43 22 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-168-01133-00001 0.28 0.26 0.48 43 20 with integral grilles PEL-N-168-01134-00001 0.29 0.26 0.48 43 11/16" NaturalSun Low-E IG PEL-N-168-01120-00001 3 3 air 0.34 0.54 0.63 56 29 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-168-01121-00001 0.34 0.49 0.56 56 26 with integral grilles PEL-N-168-01122-00001 0.35 0.49 0.56 56 25 Glazing Performance - Total Unit ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 175 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-167-01125-00001 0.34 0.24 0.43 57 with integral grilles PEL-N-167-01126-00001 0.35 0.24 0.43 57 11/16" SunDefense Low-E IG PEL-N-167-01128-00001 3 3 air 0.34 0.20 0.44 57 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-167-01129-00001 0.34 0.18 0.40 57 with integral grilles PEL-N-167-01130-00001 0.35 0.18 0.40 57 11/16" AdvancedComfort Low-E IG PEL-N-167-01132-00001 3 3 air 0.30 0.25 0.47 44 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-167-01133-00001 0.30 0.23 0.42 44 with integral grilles PEL-N-167-01134-00001 0.31 0.23 0.42 44 11/16" NaturalSun Low-E IG PEL-N-167-01120-00001 3 3 air 0.35 0.47 0.54 56 with grilles-between-the-glass PEL-N-167-01121-00001 0.35 0.43 0.49 56 with integral grilles PEL-N-167-01122-00001 0.36 0.43 0.49 56 Glazing Performance - Total Unit ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 174 Deleting Radio Code 1. Press and hold learn button in opener until LED ܫFXMJX 2. Press the desired keypad button 3. 9MNX\NQQIJQJYJYMJ ܪWXYINLNYKWTRJSYW^HTIJ Wireless Please see instructions Wall included Control with the two GZYYTS\FQQHTSYWTQXYFYNTSKTWXUJHN ܪHFYNTSX assembly and additional information. 1. Press radio button once 2. Press the desired transmitter button • The LED blinks orange once • The LED lights up red 3. Radio is now programmed 4. Repeat steps 1 and 2 to program additional buttons Maintenance The use of oil or grease on the and chain track Care or carriage will reduce conductivity. This may result in faults due to inadequate electrical contact. • The use of unsuitable cleaning agents may damage the surface of the opener. Clean with a dry lint-free cloth only Service the opener regularly as directed below. This ensures safe operation and a long service life of your opener. How Often? What? How? Once a month Test the emergency release See chapter 12.7 in manufacturer’s manual Once a month Test the obstacle detection See chapter 11.1 in manufacturer’s manual Once a month Test the safety sensors Interrupt the active safety sensors while the door is closing. The doors should stop and open. Once a year Test the door and all moving parts As directed by the door manufacturer Once a year check screws on door ceiling and header Check that screws are tight and tighten if necessary As needed chain and track maintenance free As needed Track See below cleaning instructions ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 162 HFWWNFLJFSI ܪWRQ^ press and hold the desired Homelink button to be programmed for 2 seconds and release 9. Repeat the press/hold/release sequence a second time to activate the door 10. You may need to repeat this sequence for pressing radio button on the motor carriage and then pressing the Homelink button in the vehicle up to 3 times to complete the training process 11. Homelink should now activate the rolling code equipped opener Battery • Battery pack can Pack supply power during power failure • Battery pack can be operated for approx. 5 cycles in 12 hours Note.YNXWJHTRRJSIJIYTMF[JFVZFQN ܪJI electrician to install, test and replace battery pack • Battery pack contains charging and monitoring hardware Please see below diagram (Red arrow is showing the location of ACCU for install) MEMO • Memory extension from 40 commands up to 450 commands • Easy to install and will work without programming (plug and play) • When plugged in the MEMO transfers data from internal memory to the MEMO and stores information • The MEMO must be remained plugged in. At any time the data can be transferred back to the internal memory or deleted SOMLINK Service tool, for adjusting and viewing parameter settings of the drive. These include force and speed values as well as operating parameters and other convenient functions. • Integrated Wi-Fi mode 5977. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 161 1. Make sure the unit is unplugged 2. Place the battery pack loosely in its position on the control unit cover 3. Plug the battery pack plug into the ACCU battery slot on the control board 4. Screw on cover Run a function test 5. Pull the power plug out of the power outlet • The opener is now powered by the battery pack 6. Press the button on the transmitter 7. Opener opens or closes the door at reduced speed 8. Plug the unit back into the power plug Adjusting the Close Limit If after the autoset you determine you need more closing pressure on the doors then follow below instructions. 1. Press and hold the reset button for 10 seconds • This will delete limit settings without resetting entire opener 2. Begin autoset process again starting on page 22 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 160 1. Use the remote that was packed with the opener (main box) as it is pre-programmed to the opener for your convenience Note: Only the 1st button is used on the remote for programming purposes 2. Plug the motor into your power outlet • The status light on the control board should blink rapidly 3. Press 1st button on the remote until the motor carriage starts to move • Release quickly • The motor carriage will move backward into the red limit stop and then move forwards to the close position 4. To set the close limit you must program the position for the opener to learn with your remote Note: the motors are very strong and will try to pull through the resistance while it is in learning mode and will possibly result in bending/breaking hardware • Push 1st button on the remote to stop the door right before the sliding hardware hits the end stop 5. Hold down the 1st button on the remote to activate the hop function • The opener will make a small jump forward • Release quickly 6. Repeat until you reach the desired stop location Note: An alternate solution is use something like 2x4 wood planks or other form of sturdy brace to stop the door at the right location. This will absorb ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 159 5. Slide the transmitter (4) over the head of the carriage bolt M6 (1) and tighten the wing nut M6 (2) Note: The position of the safety sensors can be adjusted through the slotted holes (5) 6. Mount the receiver on the opposite side in the same way 7. Run the two sets of wires (6) from the safety sensors to the ceiling control unit • Use staples to keep wires in place 8. Connect to control unit Wall Station Choose an easily accessible location to install the \FQQXYFYNTS9MJINXYFSHJYTYMJ ܫTTWRZXYGJFY least 63” so children cannot reach the wall station. Never run the wires between the wall station and the opener along an on-site power wire, as this can cause malfunctions. Choosing a location: • Outside of the range of motion of the door and opener mechanics • So the user can see the door directly • When operating the wall station, the user can remain outside of the range of motion of the door and opener mechanics • 4SF ܫFYXZWKFHJ Wall Station Installation 1. The wall station is typically mounted directly to the wall with provided screws, it can be wood or drywall applications. 2. Strip off approximately 3/8” of insulation from the wire ends ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 158 be adjusted through the slotted holes (2) • Drill holes for the screws. (3) • Screw in two screws (3) 4. Pre-attach the carriage bolt Adjust the emergency release chord to the length you need. See below instructions ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 157 depending on application) 7. Securely fasten YMJZ ܪYYNSLYTYMJGWFHPJY with a 1” x 1⁄4” hex head bolt and nut Wiring Instructions for the Wire Connector For wire connector applications you will need to disconnect the wiring from the control unit housing. The wires from the wire connector will be installed in the same location as the unit housing wires, and color wires remain the same. Note: It is helpful to take a picture for reference before disconnecting the wires 1. Remove the transformer by unscrewing the one phillips head screw in the center of the transformer in order to reach the red wire in the neck of the control unit housing 2. Feed the wires through the neck, and re-attach to the same terminals 3. Fasten the transformer back onto the control unit housing Transformer Screw Connector Wires ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 156 Ataching the Door Bracket 1. Position door bracket in the desired location on Installation Instructions Connecting the rails 1. Take your rails and parts boxes out and set aside 2. Slide the bridges (part 3) onto each end of Part 2 (track with motor carriage) 3. Proceed to slide other rails (part 4) into the bridges until they meet with the edges of Part 2 4. Stretch the chain across the length of the track Chain Tensioner and Wire Connector Note: Follow instructions for the chain tensioner (closing end) to install the wire connector to the open end of track. 1. Slide chain tensioner (part 5) into the opening end of the track 2. Stretch the chain 3. Rotate it 90 degrees so it slides into the chain holder 4. Make sure the tensioner is loosened before attaching chain 5. Rotate the chain back so it locks into place 6. Tighten the tensioner bolt with socket (1/2”) until the washer hits the arrow (or triangle) ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 155 9ft kit, you do not need to cut it down to size unless you lack the available space. If you do HZYNYIT\SYMJSHZYYMJWFNQ ܪWXYYFPJYMJHZY piece and use it as your guide for shortening the chain apart • It is standard to have the sliding hardware on the outside of the building with the opener on the inside. If you happen to have the sliding hardware on the inside as well, then it is important to make sure the opener will clear (not interfere) the sliding barn door hardware. To do this you can mount the opener on the ceiling or build a bump out on the side wall for clearance Single Door Applications You can utilize either the side mount or ceiling mount option, and choose whichever is better for ^TZWXUJHN ܪHFUUQNHFYNTS9MNXTUJSJWNXJFXNQ^ adapted for unique situations and it is up to the NSXYFQQJWYT ܪSIYMJHTWWJHYRTZSYNSLQTHFYNTS.YNX important to make sure the door bracket is installed in a location that helps the door clear the opening as much as possible, and that the rail is mounted in a spot that allows the motor to travel to the necessary locations. • The rail must be offset from the opening towards the open end. This will allow the motor to travel past the opening which is vital for getting the door as close to clearing the opening as possible • The amount of offset depends on whether you are installing the wire connector or not. If you are using the wire connector the distance is much shorter, measure from the end of the rail to the where the door bracket attaches to the boomerang arm. The angle of the boomerang arm changes (which also changes the measurement) depending on your application (like the height above opening) Biparting Doors You can utilize either the side mount or ceiling mount option, and choose whichever is better for ^TZWXUJHN ܪHFUUQNHFYNTS9MNXTUJSJWNXJFXNQ^ adapted for unique situations and it is up to the NSXYFQQJWYT ܪSIYMJHTWWJHYRTZSYNSLQTHFYNTS.Y is important to make sure the door brackets are installed in a location that helps the doors clear the opening as much as possible, and that the rail is mounted in a spot that allows the motors to travel to the necessary locations. • This is essentially like mounting two single door applications next to each other. The rails are offset towards the open end allowing the doors to clear the opening as much as possible • Most likely the opener rails will not touch in the middle because of the offset (depending on your opening size). The rail must be offset to the opening towards the open end. This will allow the motor to travel past the opening which is vital for getting the doors as close to clearing the opening as possible • The amount of offset depends on whether you are installing the wire connector or not. If you are using the wire connector the distance is much shorter, measure from the end of the rail to the where the door bracket attaches to the boomerang arm. The angle of the boomerang arm changes (which also changes the measurement) depending on your application ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 154 AC 50/60 hz 6 2-pin Terminal Transformer primary side 120 V AC 50/60 Hz 7 2-pin Terminal 24 V AC Transformer secondary side 8 PCB label 9 2-pin Terminal Chain and Track 24 V AC 10 Light slot (white) Terminal for Lumi+ supplementary lighting 11 2-pin Terminal Safety Sensors 12 2-pin Terminal wall station or wall button ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 153 laser sensor terminal 11 Terminal for safety contact strip 8k2/ OSE 12 Terminal for wicket door contact potential free 13 Status LED (green) 14 Reset button (green) 15 DIP switches 16 Radio button (red) ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 152 Rated voltage AC 120 V Rated frequency 60 Hz Number of programma- ble remote buttons 40 Duty cycle 40 % Emission value according to operating environment < 59 dBA – opener only Technical Data 2060 evo+ 2080 evo+ 2110 evo+ IP code NEMA1 IP21 Protection class class 2 Standard door height 7’ and 8’ doors (< 2 750 mm) Max. door height with extensions 24 ft. (up to 2 x 3.59 ft. 3 x 3.59 ft. 4 x 3.59 ft.) (7.10 m / up to 2 x 1096 mm 3 x 1096 mm 4 x 1096 mm) Speed * 9.4 inch/ sec. (240 mm/s) 8.3 inch/ sec. (210 mm/s) 4.7 inch/ sec. (120 mm/s) Max. traction and pressure force 600 N (0.75 HP) 800 N (1 HP) 1100 N (1.25 HP) Max. current consumption ** 1.0 A 1.3 A 1.5 A Standby < 3 W Channels LED Radio channel Function 1 CH 1 Pulse Mode 2 CH 2 Partial Opening or lighting function 3 CH 3 )J ܪSJI45*3 4 CH 4 )J ܪSJI CLOSED ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 151 • Shipping Dimensions are 44.5”x 7.5” x 5” • Weight is approximately 30lbs The kit includes the following parts: • Control Unit (1) • Main track pre-assembled with limit stop chain and motor carriage (2) • Isolator (pre-assembled on chain) (2.1) • Connecting sleeve x2 (3) • Additional track pieces (4) • Chain tensioner (for closing end of track) (5) • Ceiling bracket which is 2 parts (6) • Ceiling bracket hardware (7) • 2 bolts M8 x 20 (wrench size 1⁄2”) with two self- locking nuts M8 (8) • Door Arm (9) Note: not needed • Curved door arm (10) • Header bracket with pin and 2 locking c-clips (11) • 2 screws 8 x 60mm (wrench size 1⁄2”) and 2 washers 5/16” for the attachment to header (12) • 2 pins with locking c-clip for door arms Note: not needed (13) • Emergency release handle (14) • Door bracket Note: not needed (15) • Self-drilling screws 1⁄4” (wrench size 3/8”) for the door bracket Note: not needed (16) • Transmitter or remote which is preprogrammed to your opener (17) • Warning label (18) • Warning label for emergency release (19) • Sommer (manufacturer’s) installation manual (20) Photo Eyes -2 wires at 32’ 9” long (1) -1 transmitter photo eye (green sticker) (2) ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 150 ❀ ✿ ❁ ❁❂ ❃ ☞✦ ✎✤✌ ❅ ✾ ❀ ❆ ❇ ❈ ✱ ✚ ❉ ❊ ✶ ✷ ✸ ✹ ✴ ✷ ✶ ✹ ❋ ✻ ✑ ✺ ✷ ● ✑ ✴ ✹ ❋ ✻ ✑ ✺ ✷ ✂ ☎ ✄ ✏ ✆ ✝ ❍ ✞ ✆ ✏ ✄ ☎ ☎ ✝ ✁ ✞ ■ ❏ ❑ ▲ ▼ ◆ ❖ Q ◗ ❘ ☛✦✟ ✌☞ ✎✤ ☛✍✟ ✌☞ ✎✤ ❚❙ ❯✽ ❱ ❳❱❲ ❲❨ ❩ ☞☞✟ ☛ ☞✌✦ ✎✍ ☎ ✂ ❍ ✄ ✂ ❬ ✝ ❍ ✞ ✤✟ ☛✠ ☞☞ ☞✌☞ ✎✍ ☎ ❍ ✄ ☎ ☎ ✝ ☎ ✂ ✞ ✏ ★ ✄ ☎ ✆ ✝ ☎ ✂ ✞ ■ ❏ ❑ ▲ ▼ ◆ ❖ Q ◗ ❘ ✁ ✆ ✄ ☎ ☎ ☎ ✝ ☎ ✂ ✞ ☛✧✟ ☞✌✥ ✎✍ ❚❙ ✽❯ ❱ ❳❱❲ ❲❨ ❩ ☞✟ ☛❭ ✧✌✠ ✎ ✼✟ ☛✧ ☞☞ ✎✧✌ ☎ ✁ ❪ ✄ ❬ ❫ ✝ ❍ ✞ ❴ ❵ ❘ ❛ ❑ ❖ ❘ ❛ ❘ ❛ ❵ ❜ ❴ ❛ ❵ ❘ ❘ ❛ ❘ ❖ ❝ ❞ ▼ ❛ ❑ ▲ ❡ ❑ ❖ ❑ ❢ ◗ ❖ ❵ ▼ ✝ ❖ ❝ ❑ ❢ ◗ ❖ ❵ ▼ ❑ ❜ ◗ ❏ ❑ ❞ ❑ ❴ ❘ ❛ ❘ ❖ ❝ ❞ ▼ ❛ ❑ ▲ ❡ ❴ ❛ ❴ ❣ ❢ ❤ ❛ ❑ ▲ ❡ ❘ ❛ ❘ ❖ ❝ ❞ ▼ ❛ ❑ ▲ ❡ ❴ ❵ ❵ ▼ ❝ ◗ ❜ ❖ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❣ ◆ ✐ ❏ ❣ ■ ❖ ❴ ▼ ❵ ❘ ❵ ▼ ❝ ◗ ❘ ▼ ❑ Q ❵ ❜ ❵ ▼ ❝ ◗ ❜ ❖ ❴ ❴ ❵ ❘ ❵ ▼ ❝ ◗ ❘ ▼ ❑ Q Unit Sections – Aluminum-Clad Wood Frame In-Swing Doors ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 145 ✶✵ ✸✶ ✹ ✶✻✺ ✼ ✢ ✦ ✪ ✤ ✥ ❂ ✩ ✗❉ ❊✘ ✕ ✕✔ ✛✙ ✜✔ ✺✵ ✸✾ ✹ ✹✻✾ ✼✷ ✿✵ ✸❋ ✹✽ ✼✶✻ ✹✵ ✸✷● ✺✶ ✹✻ ✼✷ ✵ ✸✿✾ ✼✺ ✺✵ ✸❃ ✹ ✹✻❃ ✼✷ ✢ ❁ ★ ✥ ✦ ✦ ✣ ✧ ✦ ★ ✩ ✢ ❁ ★ ✥ ✦ ✦ ✣ ✧ ✦ ★ ✩ ❍ ■ ❏ ❑ ▲ ❏ ▼ ▲ ◆ ▲ ❖ ■ ❖ Q ❑ ◗ ❘ ◗ ✴ ❙ ❚ ❯ ❚ ❱ ✬ ❯ ❚ ❯ ❲ ❲ ✯ ✬ ❚ ✭ ✮ ❳ ❘ ❙ ❚ ❙ ❨ ✰ ✯ ✬ ❚ ✭ ✮ ❳ ❘ ◗ ❘ ◗ ✯ ❩ ✳ ❘ ✱ ❙ ❙ ❱ ✴ ✯ ❱ ❬ ✬ ✭ ✱ ❙ ❱ ✬ ◗ ✴ ◗ ✯ ❩ ✳ ✴ ✯ ✭ ✲ SE Unit Sections - Aluminum-Clad Ogee Exterior Glazing Profile ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 144 )3/$7(    1(:'225$7$'',7,21 72%(:+,7((;7(5,25 1(::,1'2:6$7$'',7,21 72%(:+,7(&/$'(;7(5,25 7*$5$*(6/$%    7 (1 )3/$7(    :22'75,0$7$'',7,21 72%(3$,17(':+,7( 5(9($/:22'/$36,',1* 72%(3$,17(':+,7( :22'6+,1*/(6$7&$55,$*(+286(72%(67$,1('%52:1 253$,17(' &2/257%'',))(5(17)520$'',7,21 1(::,1'2:6$7&$55,$*(+286(72 (;,67,1*($9(672%(3$,17(':+,7( %(:22'(;7(5,253$,17(':+,7( (;,67,1*:,1'2:6)5$0(6$1' 75,072%(3$,17(':+,7( 0,66,1*08//,21$75($5:,1'2:72 %(5(%8,/7720$7&+)5217 1(:*$5$*('2256$7&$55,$*(+286(72%( :22'(;7(5,253$,17:+,7( (;,67,1**$5$*('22523(1,1*)5$0($1' &$6,1*72%(3$,17(':+,7( 23(15$)7(57$,/6$7($9(6Z[ :22'67$57(5%2$5'3$,17(':+,7( 7*$5$*(6/$%    7 (1 )3/$7(    1(:*<3680%2$5' 1(:%$77,168/$7,21,1&$9,7< 1(::($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(5 &217,18286%(+,1'/('*(5 (;,67,1*[%2$5'6+($7+,1*725(0$,1 (;,67,1*)5$0,1*725(0$,1 1(::22'6+,1*/(66.,3&2856(6 $71(:522)/('*(5$/,*172 $//2:)8785(3$7&+,1* $6680('3/$7)250)5$0,1* (;,67,1*)281'$7,21725(0$,1 81',6785%('1(:6758&785(72%( (1*,1((5('68&+7+$712,03$&7,6 0$'(7225,*,1$/)281'$7,21 (;,67,1*6,//3/$7($1')5$0,1*6+2:1 %(<21''22523(1,1* [%2$5'6+($7+,1* 6+,1*/(6 &28/'%(,167$//('$7)8785('$7( 1(:+($'(5$7'22523(1,1* *$5$*( &$55,$*(+286( 1(:)281'$7,21$1'6/$% 6+2:(6675((7 )257&2//,16&2 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION  ' 5$:1 &+(&.(' '$7( NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 6&$/(&+(&. HANK THODE A GARAGE FOR: 714 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE, FORT COLLINS, 80521 A3.0  HISTORIC REV. 1 (/(9$7,216 &KHFNHU $XWKRU KEYNOTES EXTERIOR FINISHES EXT. DOOR & WIN. TRIM EXT. ELEVATION NOTES 7\SH0DUN 'HVFULSWLRQ 1/4" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 PROPOSED BUILDING SECTION ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 119 (;&(3772&(17(5/,1(2)32676$1'&2/8016812 '225$1':,1'2:6,=(6$5(81,7',0(16,216528*+23(1,1*6:,//9$5< '(3(1'(1721),1$/0$18)$&785(59(5,)<528*+23(1,1*6,=(6:,7+ 0$18)$&785(5 :$//)5$0,1*72%(#2&+(0),5812 1(::$//[ 1(::$//[812 :$//725(0$,1 :$//72%(5(029(' FRAMING: WINDOW TAG LEGEND: DOOR TAG LEGEND: HEATING/COOLING LEGEND: )25&('$,55(*,67(5 %$6(%2$5'+($7(5 127(+($7,1*&22/,1*6<0%2/6213/$16$5()2535(/,0,1$5< &225',1$7,2121/<$1'$5(127$&203/(7(25),1$/6<67(0/$<287 ( (;,6723* '225+$5':$5( 6(( +$5':$5(6&+('8/( )2547< 6 '22567</( 6(( 67</(/(*(1' :,'7+[+(,*+7 &'%  ( (*5(66 ( (;,6723* :+ (: (;,6723*:,'7+ 81,70$7(5,$/ : :22' ) ),%(5*/$66 9 9,1</ :,'7+[+(,*+7 7 7(03(5(' 23(5$7,21 $: $:1,1* 6/ 6/,'(5 6+ +81* '+ '%/+81* 6& &$6(0(17 '& '%/&$6(0(17 ); ),;(' 08 08//('81,7 :6/ (*5 (: 7 %$6(%2$5' +($7(5 ( (;,67,1* 1 1(:      72(.,&. :$// 6 6833/< 5 5(7851 ( (;,67,1* 1 1(: &(,/,1*$%29( ( 6 &            (;,67,1* [  :,1'2: (;,67,1* [  :,1'2: (;,67,1* [ *$5$*('22523(1,1* (;,67,1* [  ),//(',123(1,1* (;,67,1*&21&5(7('5,9(:$< (;,67,1*&$53257   83 &$55,$*( +286( (;,67,1*75((          1(: [  23(1,1* (;,67,1*:,1'2: 725(0$,1 (;,67,1*:,1'2: 725(0$,1  $  $               1(: [ '28%/( +81*&/$':22':,1'2: 1(: [ +$/) /,7(),%(5*/$66'225 1(: [ *$5$*('225 ,167$//(',1(;,67,1*23(1,1* 1(: [ *$5$*('225 ,167$//(',1(;,67,1*23(1,1* 1(: [  83 *$5$*('225 &$55,$*( +286( *$5$*( 1(:&21&5(7(:$/.   :($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(521 &$55,$*(+286(72%( &217,18286%(+,1':$// )5$0,1*2)*$5$*($'',7,21 :($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(521 &$55,$*(+286(72%( &217,18286%(+,1':$// )5$0,1*2)*$5$*($'',7,21 (;,67,1*'5,9(:$<725(0$,1     (;,67,1* [ 6,'(%<6,'( ),//(',1:,1'2:23(1,1*6 /2)7 (;,67,1* [ 6,'(%< 6,'(:,1'2:23(1,1*6 '1  $  $ 1(::22'&$6(0(1732&.(7 5(3/$&(0(176,'(%<6,'( :,1'2:6,1(;,67,1*23(1,1*6   /2)7 1(::22'&$6(0(1732&.(7 5(3/$&(0(176,'(%<6,'( :,1'2:6,1(;,67,1*23(1,1*6 '1 6+2:(6675((7 )257&2//,16&2 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION  ' 5$:1 &+(&.(' '$7( NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 6&$/(&+(&. HANK THODE A GARAGE FOR: 714 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE, FORT COLLINS, 80521 A2.0  HISTORIC REV. 1 3/$1 &KHFNHU $XWKRU KEYNOTES 1/4" = 1'-0" EXISTING 1F PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" NEW 1F PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" EXISTING 2F PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" NEW 2F PLAN ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 118  &(// MHII#KLJKFUDIWQHW 352-(&7'5$)760$1 0,.(+876(//+,*+&5$)7%8,/'(56  2)),&(  &(// PLNH#KLJKFUDIWQHW 6758&785$/(1*,1((5 -$621%$.(5$'9$1&('(1*,1((5,1* 7+675((76:/29(/$1'&2  2)),&(  &(// MDVRQ#DGYDQFHGHQJLQHHULQJOOFFRP  $//:25.,672&21)25072$'237('&2'(62)7+($87+25,7<+$9,1* -85,6',&7,21 ‡ /$5,0(5&2817<,5&$1',(&&1(&:,7+/2&$/$0(1'0(176 ‡ /29(/$1',5&$1',(&&1(&:,7+/2&$/$0(1'0(176 ‡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‡ '2256%(7:((1*$5$*($1'':(//,1*62/,':22'2562/,'+21(<&20% 67((/2)0,17+,&.1(66250,10,187(),5(5$7('(48,33(':6(/) 25$8720$7,&&/26,1*'(9,&( 5 ‡ ),5(6(3$5$7,21%(7:((1+286($1'*$5$*( $1<87,/,7<$5($/& 6+$//%( 3(55 ‡ $7(1&/26('$&&(66,%/(63$&(81'(567$,5681'(56,'(2)67$,5672%( 3527(&7(':0,1*<3%' 5 ‡ ),5(%/2&.,1*72%(3(5&2'(,1&/8',1*#,17(56(&7,216%(7:((1 &21&($/('9(57,&$/$1'+25,=217$/63$&(668&+$662)),76 5 ‡ )/225)5$0,1*72%(3527(&7('%<0,1*<3%'(;&(37 5  29(5&5$:/63$&(127,17(1'(')256725$*(25+($7,1*$33/,$1&(6  :+(5($5($3(5)/225,681'(56)$1'3(5,0(7(5,6),5(%/2&.('  :+(5()/225,62)',0(16,21$/25&20326,7(/80%(52)0,1;  :+(5(635,1./(5,6,167$//('$7$33/,$1&( )&  6(($''7/(;&(37,216/& 6$)(7<*/$66 3529,'(6$)(7<*/$66$65(4 '3(55 ‡ ,1),;('$1'23(5$%/('2253$1(/6*8$5'6$1'5$,/,1*6 ‡ $'-$&(177223(5$%/('2253$1(/6:+(5(%272)*/$6681'(5$)) $1'6,'(2)*/$66:,7+,12)3$1(/(;&(37:+(5(21/$7&+6,'($1',1 ',))(5(17:$//3/$1()520'225 ‡ :+(5(3$1(,60,16)$1'%272)*/$6681'(5$))$1' 7232)*/$66 29(5$))$1':$/.,1*685)$&(:,7+,1+25,=217$//< ‡ $7:(7/2&$7,216:,7+,1+25,=217$//<2):$7(5 6('*(:+(5(%272) */$66,681'(5$)) ‡ $767$,56/$1',1*6$1'5$036:+(5(%272)*/$6681'(5$%29( 3/$1(2):$/.,1*685)$&($1':+(5(*/$66,6:,7+,12)+25,=217$/ $5&)520126,1*2)%27720 $1'723)& 67(3 (0(5*(1&<(6&$3( (*5(66 23(1,1*6 5(48,5('$7%$6(0(176+$%,7$%/($77,&6$1'6/((3,1*52206 $1' +$%,7$%/(/2)76$1'0(==$1,1(6)& $1'6+$//0((77+()2//2:,1* ‡ 0,11(7&/($523(1,1*2)6)256):+(5(%277202)&/($523*,6 /(667+$1$%29(2876,'(*5281'/(9(/ ‡ 0,1&/($5+(,*+7$1'0,1&/($5:,'7+ ‡ 0$;,17(5,256,//+(,*+772&/($523* 0,1:+(5((;7(5,256,// (;&(('6)257&2//,16  ‡ :,1'2::(//,17(5,2560,1%27+',5(&7,216 ‡ :(//&29(566+$//0((7(6&$3(23*5(4 6$1'%(23(5$%/(:,7+287722/6 .(<62563(&,$/.12:/('*($1'%<)25&(12*5($7(57+$11250$/ 23(5$7,212)$1(6&$3(23* ‡ :+(5(:,1'2::(//,629(5+,*+/$''(5,65(4 '  /$''(50$<352-(&70$;,1725(4 ':(//',0(16,2166+$// 352-(&70,1)520:$//$1'6+$//+$9($1,16,'(:,'7+2)0,1 : 581*60$;2& 0($162)(*5(66 ':(//,1*66+$//%(3529,'(':,7+0,1(*5(66'225:+,&+,672 %(6,'( +,1*('$1'3529,'($&/($523*2)0,1:,'($1'+,*+ /$1',1*6$1'7+5(6+2/'6 ‡ /$1',1*66+$//%(:,'(25:,'7+2)67$,5'2256(59('0,1 $1' '((30,1/$1',1*65(4 '$7723$1'%277202)67$,56$1'$7%27+6,'(6 2)'2256(;&(37)257+()2//2:,1*  21(257:25,6(6$72876,'(2)(;7(5,25'2251275(4 ')25(*5(66,) ,16:,1*'225  $1,17(5,25'2250$<%(3/$&('$772367(32)$67$,5:$<3529,'(',7 '2(61276:,1*29(567$,5:$< ‡ $77+(5(4 '(*5(66'2257+5(6+2/'6+$//127(;&(('$%29()/225 25/$1',1*(;&(37$7(;7(5,252)$1,16:,1*'225:+(5(7+5(6+2/'0$< %(8372$727+(5(;7(5,25'22567+5(6+2/'6+$//%(0$; 67$,5:$<6 ‡ 0,1&/($5:,'7+$%29(+$1'5$,/+(,*+7$1'%(/2:+($'5220+(,*+7 ‡ 0,1&/($5:,'7+%(/2:+$1'5$,/+(,*+7:+$1'5$,/2121(6,'( $1':,'(:+$1'5$,/21%27+6,'(6 ‡ 0,1&/($5+($'5220$%29(/,1(&211(&7,1*126,1*6 ‡ 0$;5,6( 0,1/$5,0(5&2817<$1')257&2//,16 0,175($' ‡ 0,10$;126,1*5(48,5(':+(5(75($''(37+,681'(5 126,1*5$',860$; ‡ :,1'(575($'60,1'((3$7$1<32,17$1'0,1'((3$7:$/./,1(  )5201$552:('*(2)67$,5  ‡ 0$;*$3$723(15,6(6 +$1'5$,/6 ‡ 5(4 '$721(6,'(2)67$,5:$<62)25025(5,6(56 ‡ 7232)+$1'5$,/6+$//%($%29(/,1(&211(&7,1*126,1*6 ‡ +$1'5$,/6+$//%(&217,18286)5207235,6(572%277205,6(5:,7+ 0,1 *$372:$//$1'5(78517(50,1$7(72:$//253267$7(1'6 ‡ 7<3(,5$,/6 &,5&8/$55$,/66+$//+$9(',$0%(7:((1$1'27+(5 352),/(66+$//+$9($3(5,0(7(5%(7:((1$1'$1'0$;&5266 6(&7,212)$1'('*(6:,7+0,15$',86 ‡ 7<3(,,5$,/6 5()(5725:+(5(3(5,0(7(5(;&(('6 )$//3527(&7,21 *8$5'5$,/6 ‡ 5(4 '$73257,212)('*(2):$/.,1*685)$&(6,1&/8',1*67$,5:$<6 /$1',1*6$1'5$0367+$7$5(/2&$7('025(7+$1$%29()/225625 *5$'(:,7+,1+25,=217$//<2)('*( ‡ +(,*+70,1$))(;&(37$723(16,'(62)67$,5:+(5(6+$//%(0,1 $%29(/,1(&211(&7,1*126,1*6$1'%(7:((1$1'$%29(/,1( &211(&7,1*126,1*6,)$/626(59,1*$6+$1'5$,/ ‡ 83725(4 '+(,*+76+$//1273(50,73$66$*(2)$',$063+(5((;&(37 $723(16,'(2)67$,5:+(5(6+$//1273(50,73$66$*(2)$',$0 63+(5($1'$775,$1*8/$523(1,1*)250('%<67$,55,6(75($'*8$5' :+(5(6+$//1273(50,73$66$*(2)',$063+(5( :,1'2:6 ‡ 6+$//0((77+(5(48,5(0(1762)5:+(5(7232)23(5$%/(:,1'2:6,// ,6/(667+$1$%29(,17(5,25)/225$1'025(7+$1$%29((;7(5,25 )/225*5$'( $77,&$1'&5$:/63$&($&&(66 $77,&6:0,19(57,&$/+(,*+72) ,16,'()5$0,1* $1'$5($29(56) 5(48,5($&&(66/2&$7(',1$+$//:$<2527+(55($',/<$&&(66,%/(/2&$7,21 ‡ 0,1528*+)5$0('$&&(6623*; ‡ 0,1&/($5+($'5220 ,16,'()5$0,1* 6+$//%($7620(32,17$%29( $&&(6623* $//81'(5)/225$5($66+$//%($&&(66,%/(%<0,1;)/22525; 3(5,0(7(5:$//+$7&+ ),5(3/$&(6 $//),5(3/$&(6$5(72%(,167$//(',1&203/,$1&(:,7+0$18)$&785(5 6 ,167$//$7,215(48,5(0(1760$18)$&785(5 65(48,5(0(1766+$//683(56('( $1<&21)/,&7,1*(/(0(172)3/$16 $77,&$1'&5$:/63$&(9(17,/$7,21 81/(660((7,1*5(4 62)5(1&/26('$77,&6$1'5$)7(563$&(66+$// +$9($1(7$5($2)23(1,1*6)25&52669(17,/$7,212)0,12)7+( $5($2)7+(9(17('63$&(250,1,)%(7:((1$1'2)7+( $5($2)7+(9(17('63$&(,6/2&$7('$77+(833(53257,21 :,7+,1  2) 5,'*( 2)7+($77,&$1'5(0$,1'(5,1%277207+,5' 81'(5)/225$5($66+$//+$9(9(17,/$7,2123(1,1*62)0,12)7+( )/225$5($$1'',675,%87(':,7+,1 2)&251(56:+(5(9$325%$55,(5 ,6,167$//('2581'(5)/225$5($,6819(17('727+(2876,'( 5(48,5(' 81/(6627+(5:,6($33529('%<%8,/',1*2)),&,$/)& 9(17,/$7,21,672%( 3(55 9(17,/$7('23(1,1*66+$//%(&29(5(':,7+&25526,215(6,67$170(7$/ 0(6+:,7+0,10$;23(1,1*6 7+(50$/(19(/23( )(1(675$7,2180$; /& &(,/,1*650,1 5/29 2550,1:+(5(81&2035(66('29(5($9(6 50,181&2035(66('$7&(,/,1*:,7+287$77,&7+$7,681'(56) 2)727$/,168/$7('$5($ :$//650,1(1&$368/$7('$1'5$7$77,&.1((:$//6 )/225650,12568)),&,(1772),//&$9,7<'2:17250,1 %$6(0(17$1'819(17('&5$:/63$&(:$//650,1(1&$368/$7(' ,1)& $1'/&5,072%(635$<)2$0('725 5/& 0,12550,1$1'$,5 6($/(' 6/$%650,1)70,1'(37+$73(5,0(7(5 :$7(53527(&7,21 $//522),1*72%(,167$//('3(5&2'($1'0$18)$&785(5 6 5(&200(1'$7,21629(5$335235,$7($1'72&2'(81'(5/$<0(17$1',&( :$7(56+,(/' $//6,',1*72%(,167$//('3(5&2'($1'0)5 65(&200(1'$7,21629(5 $335235,$7($1'72&2'(:5%,167$//('3(50)5 65(&200(1'$7,216 :,7+$335235,$7($1'72&2'(&/($5$1&(672*5$'(+$5'6&$3( :,1'2:6$1'(;7(5,25'225672%(,167$//('3(50)5 6 5(&200(1'$7,216 3529,'($//522))/$6+,1*)/$6+,1*$7/('*(56%$1'6+($'(56,16,',1* +($')/$6+,1*&$3)/$6+,1*3(1(75$7,21)/$6+,1*&2//$56$1' )/$6+,1*%(7:((1',66,0,/$50$7(5,$/672&2'($1'0$18)$&785(5 6 5(&200(1'$7,216$1'$65(48,5(')25:$7(57,*+7&216758&7,21 9(5,)<81,760((7(*5(665(4 6$1'0$7&+(;,6723*6,=(6$66+2:1213/$16 9(5,)<81,760((7(*5(665(4 6$1'0$7&+(;,6723*6,=(6$66+2:1213/$16 :02817$,1$9( (;,67,1*7:26725<5(6,'(1&( (;,67,1* &$55,$*(+286( (;,67,1*&$53257 02817$,1$9(18( ” ” ” ” ” ” ” 50.00' 167.50' 167.50' 50.00' 352326(' *$5$*($'',7,21 ” ” ” $//(< (;,67,1* %/8(6358&( 6+2:(6675((7 )257&2//,16&2 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION  ' 5$:1 &+(&.(' '$7( NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 6&$/(&+(&. HANK THODE A GARAGE FOR: 714 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE, FORT COLLINS, 80521 A1.0  HISTORIC REV. 6,7(3/$1 &KHFNHU $XWKRU $ 6,7(3/$1 $ 1 3/$1 $ 1 (/(9$7,216 GENERAL NOTES ABBREVIATIONS SITE DATA SCOPE OF WORK PROJECT CONTACTS SHEET LIST BUILDING ENVELOPE PLAN NOTES SITE PLAN NOTES '225+$5':$5( 47< 67</( 7<3( 6,=( 47< % [  $ [  $ [  DOOR SCHEDULE WINDOW SCHEDULE 0$7 / 7<3( 6,=( 7(03 47< : '& [  : '+ [  '22567</( $ *$5$*('225 % *$5$*(3(5621'225 1" = 10'-0" SITE PLAN ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 117 CITY OF FORT COLLINS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM MAP PRODUCTS These map products and all underlying data are developed for use by the City of Fort Collins for its internal purposes only, and were not designed or intended for general use by members of the public. The City makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness, and in particular, accuracy in labeling or displaying dimensions, contours, property boundaries, or placement of location of any map features thereon. THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS MAKES NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR WARRANTY FOR FITNESS OF USE FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THESE MAP PRODUCTS OR THE UNDERLYING DATA. Any user of these map products, map applications, or data, accepts them AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS, and assumes all responsibility of the use thereof, and further covenants and agrees to hold the City harmless from and against all damage, loss, or liability arising from any use of this map product, in consideration of the City's having made this information available. Independent verification of all data contained herein should be obtained by any users of these products, or underlying data. The City disclaims, and shall not be held liable for any and all damage, loss, or liability, whether direct, indirect, or consequential, which arises or may arise from these map products or the use thereof by any person or entity. 425 Mathews ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 76 Standard 4: Information potential The resource has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. N/A Packet Pg. 16