Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12/19/2019 - Planning And Zoning Board - Supplemental Documents - Regular Meeting
OTHER BUSINESS, RECEIVED AT HEARING Supplemental Packet Pg. 1 ITEM 4, RECEIVED AT HEARING Supplemental Packet Pg. 2 ITEM 4, RECEIVED AT HEARING Supplemental Packet Pg. 3 ITEM 4, RECEIVED AT HEARING Supplemental Packet Pg. 4 ITEM 4, RECEIVED AT HEARING Supplemental Packet Pg. 5 ITEM 4, RECEIVED AT HEARING Supplemental Packet Pg. 6 ITEM 4, RECEIVED AT HEARING Supplemental Packet Pg. 7 ITEM 4, RECEIVED AT HEARING Supplemental Packet Pg. 8 ITEM 4, RECEIVED AT HEARING Supplemental Packet Pg. 9 ITEM 4, RECEIVED AT HEARING Supplemental Packet Pg. 10 From: Angela Milewski <amilewski@bhadesign.com> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 11:57 AM To: Kai Kleer <kkleer@fcgov.com> Cc: 'Jeff Kroeger' <jkroeger@bhadesign.com>; 'Smith, Earl' <earls@psdschools.org>; Ben Basalay <bbasalay@rbbarchitects.com>; Willits, Brendan <bwillits@psdschools.org>; 'Little, John' <jlittle@psdschools.org>; Jerry Garrettson <jerryg@psdschools.org>; matt@delichassoc.com; 'Michael P. Delich' <michael@delichassoc.com>; 'Andy Reese' <andy@northernengineering.com> Subject: RE: Planning & Zoning Board - Work Session Kai, We’re following up with responses to the remaining questions that you shared from the PZ worksession. Can these be included for the board’s review? Thank you and please let us know if you need anything else. Angie Angela K. Milewski | BHA Design Incorporated 970.223.7577 From: Kai Kleer <kkleer@fcgov.com> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 3:37 PM To: Willits, Brendan <bwillits@psdschools.org> Cc: Angie Milewski <amilewski@bhadesign.com>; Jeff Kroeger <jkroeger@bhadesign.com> Subject: Planning & Zoning Board - Work Session Brendan, The Planning & Zoning Board requested the following items to be addressed prior or at next week’s hearing: • Updated Site Access and Circulation Plan (Prior) • Berming details for area along Prospect Road (Prior) • District Stadium scoreboard details and orientation (Hearing) • Narrative of how often the district stadium will be used, anticipated schedule. (Hearing) • Clarification on proposed ‘ future lighting’ and why the photometric plan does consider these areas in the analysis. (Hearing) • For the perspective renderings, more information regarding gymnasium window system being translucent or transparent. The rendering shows one way while the elevations show something else. • What is the expected parking requirements of the 4,000 seat stadium. (Hearing) • Clarification on why the chosen architecture, materials and color are a right fit for this site. Specifically in relation to the Urban Estate zone district and existing character of the area. (Hearing) ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 11 • Demonstration of cutoff angles for stadium lighting (more technical than what is provided on page E404 of the lighting plan).(Prior) • Address the reason for not providing a wind-break for athletic fields specifically in the snip below. (Hearing) Thanks! Kai Kleer, AICP City Planner City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80526 T: 970.416.4284 | F: 970.224.6134 kkleer@fcgov.com ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 12 BHA Design Incorporated 1603 Oakridge Drive Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Page 1 of 4 voice: 970.223.7577 fax: 970.223.1827 landscape architecture | planning | urban design www.bhadesign.com December 19, 2019 to: Kai Kleer, City of Fort Collins Planning RE: PSD Prospect School Site Dear Kai, We would like to offer the following responses to the questions from the December 13 Planning and Zoning Board worksession: Q: Please provide an updated Site Access and Circulation Plan prior to hearing. A: An updated plan was provided on 12/17/2019 Q: Please provide berming details for area along Prospect Road prior to hearing. A: A diagram was provided on 12/17/2019 Q: Please provide District Stadium scoreboard details and orientation. A: PSD proposes to provide a ‘Scorevision’ LED Jumbotron Scoreboard at the south quadrant of the District Stadium Track. The Scoreboard will be approximately 26’(W)x19’(H), mounted on Wide Flange Steel Columns, with the bottom edge approximately 9’ above adjacent grade. The Scoreboard will be oriented facing north to minimize sun glare for spectator viewing. The scoreboard is located approximately 744’ from the north property boundary. RE: Attached ‘01_Scoreboard Product Literature.pdf’ for additional information, as well as a photograph depicting conditions similar to the proposed equipment. Q: Please provide a narrative of how often the district stadium will be used, anticipated schedule. A: French Field is currently the only District stadium and hosts approximately 115 varsity events occurring 5-6 times per week during the combined Fall and Spring sports seasons. The stadium at Prospect will be the home venue for the new Prospect school and will also serve as a second District stadium to help reduce the event volumes at French Field. Current planning anticipates Fossil Ridge HS and Fort Collins HS will generally use the Prospect site for their home varsity contests, while Rocky Mountain HS and Poudre HS will continue to use French Field for these events. However, the stadium at Prospect will have a smaller capacity than French Field (3,500 seats initially with 4,000 seats maximum at future full build-out vs 6,000 seats at French Field). Most varsity events have attendance well below the capacity of the PSD stadiums. The few largest events are typically when cross- town 5a rivalry football teams play against each other. Since French Field will ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 13 BHA Design Incorporated 1603 Oakridge Drive Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Page 2 of 4 voice: 970.223.7577 fax: 970.223.1827 landscape architecture | planning | urban design www.bhadesign.com remain the larger of the district stadiums, PSD plans to schedule larger events at French Field regardless of the home team. It is anticipated that the stadium at Prospect would be used for 3-4 varsity contests per week during the Fall and Spring athletic seasons, or a total of 90-100 varsity contests for the two seasons combined, with the larger district events continuing to be hosted at the larger-capacity French Field. Q: Please provide clarification on proposed ‘future lighting’ and why the photometric plan does consider these areas in the analysis. A: For the SPAR plans we are showing the anticipated full buildout of the site and uses planned. While the majority of the improvements shown will be constructed initially, some of these improvements may be built in phases over time. For example, the lighting for the ballfields is planned to be added at a later date, but we have completed the design and will run conduit to these fields so the lighting can be added in the future with minimal site impacts. We included the lighting contributions for these fields (sports lighting pole types A1 through A4, B1 through B4, C1 through C4 and D1 through D4) in the photometric plans in order to provide transparency and review of the impacts of the full site buildout. Q: For the perspective renderings, please provide more information regarding gymnasium window system being translucent or transparent. The rendering shows one way while the elevations show something else. A: RE: Attached ‘02_REVISED Architectural Elevations and Perspectives.pdf’ The drawings have been modified to: a) More clearly delineate the difference between translucent and transparent glazing in the Elevation Views (Please note the actual tone used on the Elevations is for graphic purposes and not representative of the ACTUAL ‘Crystal-on-White’ proposed translucent panel finish) b) Show the CFC preferred ‘Pewter’ Masonry Veneer Color on BOTH the Elevation and Perspective Views Q: Please provide the expected parking requirements of the 4,000-seat stadium. A: The attendance and parking requirements for high school stadiums in PSD are quite different than a special event facility like CSU’s stadium. Most varsity events have attendance well below the capacity of the PSD field venues. The few largest events are typically when cross-town 5a rivalry football teams play against each other. But with our high school events, teams and staff arrive on busses, and many students and families carpool to even these higher-attendance games. PSD manages their event sites carefully and operationally has the ability to designate venue locations based on expected event attendance. ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 14 BHA Design Incorporated 1603 Oakridge Drive Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Page 3 of 4 voice: 970.223.7577 fax: 970.223.1827 landscape architecture | planning | urban design www.bhadesign.com The stadium at Prospect will have a significantly smaller capacity than French Field (3,500 seats initially with 4,000 seats maximum at future full build-out vs 6,000 seats at French Field). Since French Field will remain the larger of the district stadiums, PSD plans to schedule larger events at French Field regardless of the home team. In order to right-size the parking for the stadium, parking at the Prospect site has been designed to accommodate the largest anticipated events based on past PSD event attendance data so that all parking can be accommodated on-site. Initially 876 parking spaces are planned for the areas adjacent to the stadium and school plus separate parking for busses (not counting the east athletics lot). We also show future parking expansion areas on-site for an additional 147 spaces that could easily added when needed. In comparison, Rocky Mountain HS has 930 spaces at their site serving the larger French Field stadium with a seating capacity 1.5x the size of the Prospect school stadium. In addition, PSD has procured properties to the west of the Prospect school site for potential future needs, which could include expanded parking for the stadium if conditions were to change in the future. PSD does not want to overbuild parking that will not be used. Equally PSD does not want to create parking concerns for existing neighborhoods near the planned school. Based on using PSD attendance and use data, the ability and commitment to continue to use the larger French Field for the most highly-attended events, and by securing the property west of the stadium site where parking expansions could occur if needed in the future, PSD is confident that the parking for the planned stadium is adequate and right-sized. Q: Please provide clarification on why the chosen architecture, materials and color are a right fit for this site. Specifically, in relation to the Urban Estate zone district and existing character of the area. A: This site is a transition site – from the I-25 interchange and planned higher intensity uses including Industrial uses to the lower-density residential uses to the east. Public schools including high schools are allowed uses in the Urban Estate zone district. A school is a community landmark designed and built to serve the area for 50+ years. The building character is designed to convey innovation and permanence and to best serve the academic spaces it houses, but with acknowledgment of the setting and context of its surroundings. The building materials have been selected with respect to their durability, easy maintainability and sustainable qualities, and with brick scale and colors to respect to the adjacent surroundings. The predominant building material is masonry. Large expanses of glass are provided to accommodate views to the outdoors and to provide interior daylighting for energy efficiency and an optimal learning ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 15 BHA Design Incorporated 1603 Oakridge Drive Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Page 4 of 4 voice: 970.223.7577 fax: 970.223.1827 landscape architecture | planning | urban design www.bhadesign.com environment. The ‘Earth-tone’ color palette of sandstone, rust and bronze has been selected including: • MASONRY: ‘Pewter’ color • METAL PANELS: ‘Woodgrain Golden Teak’ color • WINDOW FRAMES: ‘Bronze’ color The building complies with the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code - Division 4.2 – Urban Estate District (U-E) ‘Dimensional Standards’ Requirements. Given its function, it is a large-scale building sited within a large campus setting. Efforts have been made to provide larger setbacks from roads most visible by the public, and landscaped buffers along its edges adjacent to nearby properties. Q: Please provide demonstration of cutoff angles for stadium lighting (more technical than what is provided on page E404 of the lighting plan). A: An update was provided on 12/17/2019 Q: Address the reason for not providing a wind-break for the athletic fields directly east of the school building. A: The areas immediately adjacent to these athletic fields remain open intentionally as they are used for warm-ups, practicing, coaching, and spectating. A windbreak immediately south of the access drive would create shading issues in winter. Instead a landscape buffer has been provided north of these fields along the property boundary for this purpose. Sincerely, Angela K. Milewski BHA Design, Inc. ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 16 notes: 1 2 3 rev description date client: Drawings have been created for the project specified below. All written dimensions take precedence over any scaled dimensions. These drawings are for visual representation only and may require an engineer stamped approval prior to any installation. Scorevision does not assume liability for improper fabrication and/or manufacturing. 11742 Stongegate Circle Omaha, NE 68164 project: title: drawn by: date: page: revisions: 402.253.0250 oW219 Specifications oW219 Install Nic Novotny /2/17 1 of 1 -'LVSOD\ instal weight (LED&DELQHWVRQO\) = lbs Power Requirements: oW219 ',63/$< SPECIFICATIONS - Total of 1 independent 20 amp @ 110V Circuits -Single Phase - 12 gauge wire (hot, nuetral, ground) Power Consumption: - Average of w/sqm (w * 44.2 sqm = watts) - Max of w/sqm (w * 44.2 sqm = watts) Data Requirements: - One fiber cable with strands, single mode, with LC connectors LED Specifications: - 10mm pixel pitch - SMD pixel configuration ->00HZ refresh rate - (-40°C to +60°C) operating temperature - 140°H/140°V viewing angle - 0x320mm modules NOTE: Column designations, below grade depth, and footing spec are at the discretion of a licensed engineer. All dimensions and designations shown are approximate for bidding purposes only. SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW 18'-10 3/4" 25'-2 3/8" 960mm (37.795") 1280mm (50.394") 9'-0" min (recommended) +/- 12'-0" (Below Grade w/ 36" Ø footing) ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 18 > s >ϭ ϭϬϬΖͲϬΗ > s >Ϯ ϭϭϰΖͲϬΗ dZE^>h Edt>> WE >^z^d D 'ZzK>KZϰyϭϲ DW ZKZZ/< Z<ZKE K>KZ>hD/EhD ^dKZ &ZKEd^z^d D Zh^dK>KZD d>WE >͕ Dd,WZ Ͳ&/E/^, KW/E' ϭϮΖͲϯΗ ϭϬΖͲϬΗ ϱϲΖͲϴΗ ϭϮΖͲϬΗ ϮϲΖͲϲΗ ϲϬΖͲϮΗ ϴϭΖͲϰΗ ϭϳΖͲϰΗ ϭϴϭΖͲϰΗ ϰϱΖͲϰΗ ϯϲΖͲϴΗ Z<ZKE K>KZ>hD/EhD ^dKZ &ZKEd^z^d D 'ZzK>KZϰyϭϲ DW ZKZZ/< Zh^dK>KZD d>WE >͕ Dd,WZ Ͳ&/E/^, KW/E' 'ZzK>KZ&/ Z'>^^ Z /E&KZ W>^d/KKZ͕dzW/> >d ZEd/E'KhZ^ Z/<Z s >͕dzW/> ϱϯϵΖͲϳΗ Z<ZKE K>KZWZ Ͳ&/E/^, D d>KW/E' > s >ϭ ϭϬϬΖͲϬΗ > s >Ϯ ϭϭϰΖͲϬΗ Z<ZKE K>KZ>hD/EhD ^dKZ &ZKEd^z^d D Zh^dK>KZD d>WE >͕ ͲW>Kdd ^, d/E&KZDd/KE WZK: d/E&KZDd/KE WZK: dW,^ ^ > Z,/d d /^^h d ͗ WZK: dη͗ KE^h>dEd dͲ ϵϳϬ͘ϰϴϰ͘Ϭϭϭϳ &Ͳ ϵϳϬ͘ϰϴϰ͘ϬϮϲϰ ϯϭϱ ĂƐƚDŽƵŶƚĂŝŶǀĞ ^ƵŝƚĞϭϬϬ &ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕KϴϬϱϮϰͲϮϵϭϯ ΞϮϬϭϵ ǁǁǁ͘ƌďďĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƐ͘ĐŽŵ Z,/d d^ Z s/^/KE^͗ ϭϬͬϴͬϮϬϭϵϯ͗ϱϭ͗ϬϱWD ϬϬϮ ϭϴϬϮ D^ͬ,^W ZW d/s ^ W^D^ͬ,^WZKdKdzW ^WKhZ ^,KK>,KK>dWZK^/^dZ/d W d 63$568%0,77$/ ϭϬͬϬϵͬϮϬϭϵ ^dWZK^W dZΘ^Khd,KhEdzZ͘ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ^Z/Wd/KE d ROUND 2 VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST METAL PANEL 1 - WOODGRAIN GOLDEN TEAK METAL PANEL 2 - SILVER SMITH INTERSTATE BRICK - PEWTER 11/22/2019 VIEW FROM NORTHWEST MULLIONS BRONZE MULLIONS AT OPERABLE WINDOWS CLEAR ANODIZED ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 20 From: Angela Milewski <amilewski@bhadesign.com> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 12:04 PM To: Martina Wilkinson <mwilkinson@fcgov.com>; Kai Kleer <kkleer@fcgov.com> Cc: 'Andy Reese' <andy@northernengineering.com>; Willits, Brendan <bwillits@psdschools.org>; 'Little, John' <jlittle@psdschools.org>; 'Smith, Earl' <earls@psdschools.org>; 'Jeff Kroeger' <jkroeger@bhadesign.com>; 'Ben Basalay' <bbasalay@rbbarchitects.com>; matt@delichassoc.com; 'Michael P. Delich' <michael@delichassoc.com>; Jerry Garrettson <jerryg@psdschools.org> Subject: RE: Prospect School P and Z questions follow up Martina, Brendan forwarded your questions to me and I've been collecting responses to these and other items raised at the PZ worksession. If helpful, here are responses to your specific questions below. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Angie Angela K. Milewski | BHA Design Incorporated 970.223.7577 -----Original Message----- From: Willits, Brendan <bwillits@psdschools.org> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 2:02 PM To: Little, John <jlittle@psdschools.org>; Smith, Earl <earls@psdschools.org>; Angela Milewski (amilewski@bhadesign.com) <amilewski@bhadesign.com>; Jeff Kroeger <jkroeger@bhadesign.com>; Ben Basalay (bbasalay@rbbarchitects.com) <bbasalay@rbbarchitects.com> Cc: Andy Reese (andy@northernengineering.com) <andy@northernengineering.com> Subject: FW: Prospect School P and Z questions follow up Brendan Willits, GISP Planning Manager Poudre School District<https://www.psdschools.org/> bwillits@psdschools.org<mailto:bwillits@psdschools.org> (o) 970.490.3413 | (c) 970.556.8540 From: Martina Wilkinson <mwilkinson@fcgov.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 1:59 PM To: Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Matt Delich <matt@delichassoc.com>; Michael P. Delich <michael@delichassoc.com>; Willits, Brendan <bwillits@psdschools.org> Cc: Kai Kleer <kkleer@fcgov.com> Subject: FW: Prospect School P and Z questions follow up Hey guys - ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 21 We had the Planning and Zoning Worksession on Friday for the Prospect Middle / High School site. There are a couple of follow up items that I think we need to be prepared for this Thursday's hearing. See below. * Bus circulation and storage. Can you remind us of the route for bus circulation? There seems to be some uncertainty about whether it's all to/from CR 5, or if some will be using the signalized access on Prospect at McLaughlin. That was an early indication from PSD, and we asked that the bus circulation be completely separate from regular student vehicles. I was under the impression that after our comment, ALL bus traffic would come from / to the Prospect access in order to keep them out of the regular vehicle flow of traffic. Has that changed? Also - Did I hear that you're planning on using the site as a bus barn for up to 21 buses? That isn't something that I had heard about, nor do I believe it's in the TIS. It is correct and important that the bus circulation is separated from student/parent vehicles. For the Prospect site, the main school entrance faces south with student parking and parent drop-off immediately adjacent and accessed from Prospect Road. Staff parking and bus drop-off areas are located to the north of the school with some bus overflow to the west of the school. Staff will enter the north side of the school with security badges, and these doors will be open and monitored for students riding busses only during drop-off times. In full build-out, the school busses will enter the north side of the site from both CR5 to the east and from the extension of Carriage Parkway to the west. In the interim condition, busses coming from the west will enter the site at the intersection of Prospect and McLaughlin Lane. PSD has procured properties to the west of the SPAR school site for potential future needs including: 1) to control the ability to connect the school site to the future extension of Carriage Parkway, 2) to allow for future parking expansions for the stadium, not currently anticipated but available if conditions change in the future, and 3) to provide for other possible PSD future uses. A bus facility is a future need for PSD, but there is no certainty that it would be located here. This use or any future PSD plans for these properties outside the SPAR area would come through a separate design and review process with required traffic studies. * Stadium parking. We don't review parking numbers in Traffic Operations since parking requirements come from the Planning Department and the Land Use Code. But sounds like that question will come up, and either the PSD team or Kai should be prepared to address. Here's some information on how I would look at that: Looks like there are 875 spaces planned initially on the site plan, with the ability to add 150 more in the future for a total of 1,025 spaces. It's been our experience that typical vehicle occupancy for special event facilities (including stadiums - Hughes and the new on- campus) is 2.6 - 3.0 people per vehicle. That would calculate to needing 1,300-1,500 spaces total for a sell-out. Given that this is high school and lots of students carpool and away teams and their students sometimes come on buses, maybe we can make a case that a high school stadium may be on the lower end need a little less parking than 1,300, but I'm not sure that the initial 875 will be enough for a big event...... Someone should be able to answer that. We agree that the ratios for parking for high school stadiums in PSD are quite different than a special event facility like CSU’s stadium. Most varsity events have attendance well below the capacity of the PSD field venues. The few largest events are typically when cross-town 5a rivalry football teams play against each other. But as you note, teams and staff arrive on ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 22 busses, and many students and families carpool to even these higher-attendance games. PSD manages their event sites carefully and operationally has the ability to designate venue locations based on expected event attendance. The stadium at Prospect will have a significantly smaller capacity than French Field (3,500 seats initially with 4,000 seats maximum at future full build-out vs 6,000 seats at French Field). Since French Field will remain the larger of the district stadiums, PSD plans to schedule larger events at French Field regardless of the home team. In order to right-size the parking for the stadium, the Prospect site has been designed to accommodate the largest anticipated events based on past PSD event attendance data so that all parking can be accommodated on-site. In addition, PSD has procured properties to the west of the stadium and school site for potential future needs including expanded parking for the stadium if conditions were to change in the future. If you could let us know your thoughts on this, that would be great! Thanks - m Martina Wilkinson, P.E. PTOE Traffic Engineer City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations mwilkinson@fcgov.com<mailto:mwilkinson@fcgov.com> 970-221-6887 ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 23 ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 24 W CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G X X X CTV X X CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV X CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV X CTV XX XXX XXX X XXX X X X XX X X X X X XXXXX XX XX XX X XX XX XX / / / / / / / / // / / / / / / WWWW CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV W W W W W W W WW WW WW WW W W W W W W W W WW WW WW WW WW WW WW WW WW WW WW W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G X X X CTV X X CTVCTV VVCTV CTVCTV VVCTV CTV VVC CTV CTVCTV VV C VV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV C CTV CTVV CTV CTV X CTV C CTV CTV CTV CTV V CTV CTV GG CTV TV CTV C CTV CTV X CTV CTV CTV CTV CTVV SS SS S SS SS From: Jeff Kroeger <jkroeger@bhadesign.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 4:35 PM To: Kai Kleer <kkleer@fcgov.com> Cc: 'Angie Milewski' <amilewski@bhadesign.com>; Willits, Brendan <bwillits@psdschools.org>; 'Little, John' <jlittle@psdschools.org>; 'Smith, Earl' <earls@psdschools.org> Subject: RE: Planning & Zoning Board - Work Session Kai.....responses to the three ‘PRIOR’ to the hearing items as follows: ITEM #1 Updated Site Access & Circulation Plan. See ATTACHED exhibit. Martina also requested that this document be updated. ITEM #2 Berming Details. See ATTACHED exhibit. ITEM #9 Demonstration of Cutoff Angles for Sports Lighting. I understand you had a conversation with Marshall Moore with IMEG this a.m. Subsequently, he reached out to the Sports Lighting vendor and returned some compelling / helpful information. ATTACHED (.Zip file) is the following: 1. Case Studies: Aerial imagery of All City Field (Denver Public Schools) and the NEW Severance High School Stadium. Both of these projects use the same technology/fixture being proposed at Prospect, but Prospect is proposing the 4000k color temperature (vs. 5700k for DPS & Severance) and lights levels of 30 foot candles (vs. 50 foot candles at DPS & Severance). These images provide an actual demonstration of projected spill / glare levels, but please note the Prospect field spill and glare levels will be improved further than what is being represented in these photos. 2. Imagery of a comparison of the typical “old school” HID field lighting...side x side with the Musco fixture proposed for stadium at Prospect. Dramatic spill / cut off differences. 3. Musco Warranty. See Marshall’s “narrative” below for what Musco guarantees re: spill. 4. Data Sheets for the fixtures Musco utilizes...for what it’s worth. Note that these indicate their typical/standard 5700k color temp, but as indicated above, Prospect will be utilizing 4000k. Marshall Moore’s narrative response to Item 9: Demonstration of Cutoff Angles: It is the engineer’s opinion that the “blanket” grid of photometric calculation points and extended “line” calculation at 20’ past the property, which were included in the SPAR documentation, best speak to the cutoff performance of these fixtures from a technical aspect. Maximum horizontal light levels are being met in all locations, including the future lighting for the baseball and softball fields. This is the greatest level of detail that the engineer can provide, apart from displaying individual fixture distribution plots and IES file contents. Due to the proprietary nature of these fixtures, and a non-disclosure agreement that is in effect between IMEG and Musco, this information cannot be shared publicly or privately. In order to support the information provided on the SPAR Sheet E404 in another manner, we have included a number of case studies of Musco LED installations from across the region, that visually depict ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 27 the cutoff performance of these chosen fixtures. These installations are all shown at Class II light levels, which are in fact brighter than what is being proposed at the Prospect site ( Class III, or 30 footcandles, color temperature of 4000k). Given this statement, the glare levels will only be improved further than what is being represented in these photos (which is already minimal). In order to address any remaining concerns, and to provide an outlet for which adverse and unforeseen impacts can be promptly mitigated, we have also included a sample Warranty document from Musco, which will be required per IMEG and PSD specifications. This warranty covers lighting performance on the field, as well as spill light off the field. If an issue does arise, there is a predetermined mechanism in place for these items to be dealt with, at Musco’s cost. In the event that unwanted light trespass does occur, which exceeds light levels shown in the sports lighting shop drawing set, individually aimed fixture heads can be easily manipulated and re-aimed to correct any deviations from the desired performance. All fixture cutsheets are provided here to depict the adjustable aiming knuckle. In addition, I contact the International Dark Skies Association. They provided me with the ATTACHED “Criteria for Community Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting” document. In short, IDC has determined to be considered dark skies compliant, the luminaire color temperature cannot exceed 5700 degrees kelvin. Item #5 does a nice job describing why they do not endorse the 3000k. Let us know if you have further questions. I know that Angie is working on a response to Martina and we are continuing to develop our presentation for Thursday night. Thanks Kai. Jeff Kroeger | BHA Design Incorporated 970.223.7577 ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 28 From: Kai Kleer <kkleer@fcgov.com> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 3:37 PM To: Willits, Brendan <bwillits@psdschools.org> Cc: Angie Milewski <amilewski@bhadesign.com>; Jeff Kroeger <jkroeger@bhadesign.com> Subject: Planning & Zoning Board - Work Session Brendan, The Planning & Zoning Board requested the following items to be addressed prior or at next week’s hearing: x Updated Site Access and Circulation Plan (Prior) x Berming details for area along Prospect Road (Prior) x District Stadium scoreboard details and orientation (Hearing) x Narrative of how often the district stadium will be used, anticipated schedule. (Hearing) x Clarification on proposed ‘ future lighting’ and why the photometric plan does consider these areas in the analysis. (Hearing) x For the perspective renderings, more information regarding gymnasium window system being translucent or transparent. The rendering shows one way while the elevations show something else. x What is the expected parking requirements of the 4,000 seat stadium. (Hearing) x Clarification on why the chosen architecture, materials and color are a right fit for this site. Specifically in relation to the Urban Estate zone district and existing character of the area. (Hearing) x Demonstration of cutoff angles for stadium lighting (more technical than what is provided on page E404 of the lighting plan).(Prior) x Address the reason for not providing a wind-break for athletic fields specifically in the snip below. (Hearing) ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 29 Thanks! Kai Kleer, AICP City Planner City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80526 T: 970.416.4284 | F: 970.224.6134 kkleer@fcgov.com ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 30 ACCESS / CIRCULATION DIAGRAM POUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT - MS/HS Prospect Site FULL-MOVEMENT ACCESS, WITH SIGNAL FULL-MOVEMENT ACCESS FULL-MOVEMENT WITH SIGNAL FULL-MOVEMENT, WITH GATE TO RESTRICT ACCESS (SCHOOL USE HOURS) GATE TO RESTRICT ACCESS (CARD-ACTIVATED) GATE TO RESTRICT ACCESS (CARD-ACTIVATED) STAFF PARKING E PROSPECT RD APPX 1/4 MILE SPACING PRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR STUDENTS AND VISITORS STADIUM ENTRANCE LIMITED ACCESS ENTRANCE FOR STAFF AND STUDENTS FROM BUSSES ONLY LIMITED ACCESS ENTRANCE FOR STUDENTS FROM BUSSES ONLY FUTURE FULL-MOVEMENT AND SIGNAL LEGEND CIRCULATION TYPES BUS STAFF STUDENT PARENT TRAFFIC STUDY TRIP DISTRIBUTION CR 5 (MAIN STREET) 20% 10% 40% 30% X% POTENTIAL BUS FACILITY POTENTIAL STADIUM PARKING STADIUM PARKING STUDENT PARKING STADIUM W X X VAULT ELEC ELEC W W W W MMHH / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / PROSPECT ROAD IN LN. DR. 2.5'h. 2'h. 2'h. 2'h. 4.5'h. 17 16 17 18 19 19 18 17 18 18 19 18 17 17 18 18 18 17 19 20 21 22 FUTURE PARKING FUTURE PARKING SCHOOL SIGNAGE 19 19 2'h. 20 20 19 182 ft 136 ft 130 ft 0' 60' 120' SCHOOL SIGNAGE STUDENT PARKING STUDENT PARKING STUDENT #! # #! # #! # #! # #! # #! # ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC · 31567975 · M-3465-en04-1 Solutions for Lighting · TLC for LED® DENVER ALL CITY FIELD Denver, Colorado, USA 50 footcandles (500 lux), 2:1 uniformity System energy comparison: 79.4 kW – 75% reduction compared to typical HID equipment ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 39 ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC · 31567975 · M-3466-en04-1 Solutions for Lighting · TLC for LED® DENVER ALL CITY FIELD Denver, Colorado, USA 50 footcandles (500 lux), 2:1 uniformity System energy comparison: 79.4 kW – 75% reduction compared to typical HID equipment ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 40 ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC · 31567975 · M-3467-en04-1 Solutions for Lighting · TLC for LED® DENVER ALL CITY FIELD Denver, Colorado, USA 50 footcandles (500 lux), 2:1 uniformity System energy comparison: 79.4 kW – 75% reduction compared to typical HID equipment ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 41 ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC · 31567975 · M-3468-en04-1 Solutions for Lighting · TLC for LED® DENVER ALL CITY FIELD Denver, Colorado, USA 50 footcandles (500 lux), 2:1 uniformity System energy comparison: 79.4 kW – 75% reduction compared to typical HID equipment ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 42 20.00 in (508 mm) 12.00 in (305 mm) 21.50 in (546 mm) 26.00 in (660 mm) Luminaire Data Weight (luminaire) 40 lb (18 kg) UL listing number E338094 UL listed for USA / Canada UL1598 CSA-C22.2 No.250.0 CE Declaration LVD, EMC, RoHS Ingress protection, luminaire IP65 Material and finish Aluminum, powder-coat painted Wind speed rating (aiming only) 150 mi/h (67 m/s) UL, IEC ambient temperature rating, luminaire 50°C (122°F) Photometric Characteristics Projected lumen maintenance per IES TM-21-11 L90 (13.5k) >81,000 h L80 (13.5k) >81,000 h L70 (13.5k) >81,000 h CIE correlated color temperature 5700 K Color rendering index (CRI) 75 typ, 70 min Lumens1 46,500 Footnotes: 1) Incorporates appropriate dirt depreciation factor for life of luminaire. U.S. and foreign patent(s) issued and pending • ©2018 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC • TLC-LED-400 5700K 75 CRI • M-2604-en04-4 Datasheet: TLC-LED-400 Luminaire and Driver www.musco.com · lighting@musco.com 1 ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 43 + − Fuse L1 Fuse L2* Surge† protection Disconnect Driver Controller (if present) * If L2 (com) is neutral then not switched or fused. † Not present if indoor installation. Luminaire Luminaire Driver Data Typical Wiring Electrical Data Rated wattage1 Per driver 800 W Per luminaire 400 W Number of luminaires per driver 2 Starting (inrush) current <40 A, 256 μs Fuse rating 15 A UL, IEC ambient temperature rating, electrical components enclosure 50°C (122°F) Ingress protection, electrical components enclosure IP54 Efficiency 95% Dimming mode optional Range, energy consumption 26 – 100% Range, light output 30 – 100% 200 Vac 208 Vac 220 Vac 230 Vac 240 Vac 277 Vac 347 Vac 380 Vac 400 Vac 415 Vac 480 Vac 50/60 Hz 60 Hz 50/60 Hz 50 Hz 50/60 Hz 60 Hz 60 Hz 50/60 Hz 50 Hz 50 Hz 60 Hz Max operating current per luminaire2 2.40 A 2.31 A 2.18 A 2.09 A 2.00 A 1.73 A 1.39 A 1.27 A 1.20 A 1.16 A 1.00 A Footnotes: 1) Rated wattage is the power consumption, including driver efficiency losses, at stabilized operation in 25°C ambient temperature environment. 2) Operating current includes allowance for 0.90 minimum power factor, operating temperature, and LED light source manufacturing tolerances. Notes 1. Use thermal magnetic HID-rated or D-curve circuit breakers. 2. See Musco Control System Summary for circuit information. U.S. and foreign patent(s) issued and pending • ©2018 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC • TLC-LED-400 5700K 75 CRI • M-2604-en04-4 Datasheet: TLC-LED-400 Luminaire and Driver www.musco.com · lighting@musco.com 2 ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 44 26.00 in (660 mm) 25.00 in (635 mm) 24.00 in (610 mm) 19.00 in (483 mm) Luminaire Data Weight (luminaire) 45 lb (20 kg) UL listing number E338094 UL listed for USA / Canada UL1598 CSA-C22.2 No.250.0 CE Declaration LVD, EMC, RoHS Ingress protection, luminaire IP65 Material and finish Aluminum, powder-coat painted Wind speed rating (aiming only) 150 mi/h (67 m/s) UL, IEC ambient temperature rating, luminaire 50°C (122°F) Photometric Characteristics Projected lumen maintenance per IES TM-21-11 L90 (13.5k) >81,000 h L80 (13.5k) >81,000 h L70 (13.5k) >81,000 h CIE correlated color temperature 5700 K Color rendering index (CRI) 75 typ, 70 min Lumens1 136,000 Footnotes: 1) Incorporates appropriate dirt depreciation factor for life of luminaire. U.S. and foreign patent(s) issued and pending • ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC • TLC-LED-1200 5700K 75 CRI • M-2943-en04-3 Datasheet: TLC-LED-1200 Luminaire and Driver www.musco.com · lighting@musco.com 1 ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 45 + − Fuse L1 Fuse L2* Surge† protection Disconnect Driver Controller (if present) * If L2 (com) is neutral then not switched or fused. † Not present if indoor installation. Luminaire Driver Data Typical Wiring Electrical Data Rated wattage1 Per driver 1170 W Per luminaire 1170 W Number of luminaires per driver 1 Starting (inrush) current <40 A, 256 μs Fuse rating 15 A UL, IEC ambient temperature rating, electrical components enclosure 50°C (122°F) Ingress protection, electrical components enclosure IP54 Efficiency 95% Dimming mode optional Range, energy consumption 14 – 100% Range, light output 19 – 100% 200 Vac 208 Vac 220 Vac 230 Vac 240 Vac 277 Vac 347 Vac 380 Vac 400 Vac 415 Vac 480 Vac 50/60 Hz 60 Hz 50/60 Hz 50 Hz 50/60 Hz 60 Hz 60 Hz 50/60 Hz 50 Hz 50 Hz 60 Hz Max operating current per luminaire2 7.26 A 6.98 A 6.60 A 6.31 A 6.05 A 5.24 A 4.18 A 3.82 A 3.63 A 3.50 A 3.03 A Footnotes: 1) Rated wattage is the power consumption, including driver efficiency losses, at stabilized operation in 25°C ambient temperature environment. 2) Operating current includes allowance for 0.90 minimum power factor, operating temperature, and LED light source manufacturing tolerances. Notes 1. Use thermal magnetic HID-rated or D-curve circuit breakers. 2. See Musco Control System Summary for circuit information. U.S. and foreign patent(s) issued and pending • ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC • TLC-LED-1200 5700K 75 CRI • M-2943-en04-3 Datasheet: TLC-LED-1200 Luminaire and Driver www.musco.com · lighting@musco.com 2 ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 46 22.00 in (559 mm) 27.00 in (686 mm) 23.00 in (584 mm) 26.00 in (660 mm) Luminaire Data Weight (luminaire) 67 lb (30 kg) UL listing number E338094 UL listed for USA / Canada UL1598 CSA-C22.2 No.250.0 CE Declaration LVD, EMC, RoHS Ingress protection, luminaire IP65 Material and finish Aluminum, powder-coat painted Wind speed rating (aiming only) 150 mi/h (67 m/s) UL, IEC ambient temperature rating, luminaire 50°C (122°F) Photometric Characteristics Projected lumen maintenance per IES TM-21-11 L90 (13.5k) >81,000 h L80 (13.5k) >81,000 h L70 (13.5k) >81,000 h CIE correlated color temperature 5700 K Color rendering index (CRI) 75 typ, 70 min Lumens1 160,000 Footnotes: 1) Incorporates appropriate dirt depreciation factor for life of luminaire. U.S. and foreign patent(s) issued and pending • ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC • TLC-LED-1500 5700K 75 CRI • M-2955-en04-3 Datasheet: TLC-LED-1500 Luminaire and Driver www.musco.com · lighting@musco.com 1 ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 47 + − Fuse L1 Fuse L2* Surge† protection Disconnect Driver Controller (if present) * If L2 (com) is neutral then not switched or fused. † Not present if indoor installation. Luminaire Driver Data Typical Wiring Electrical Data Rated wattage1 Per driver 1430 W Per luminaire 1430 W Number of luminaires per driver 1 Starting (inrush) current <40 A, 256 μs Fuse rating 15 A UL, IEC ambient temperature rating, electrical components enclosure 50°C (122°F) Ingress protection, electrical components enclosure IP54 Efficiency 95% Dimming mode optional Range, energy consumption 12 – 100% Range, light output 17 – 100% 200 Vac 208 Vac 220 Vac 230 Vac 240 Vac 277 Vac 347 Vac 380 Vac 400 Vac 415 Vac 480 Vac 50/60 Hz 60 Hz 50/60 Hz 50 Hz 50/60 Hz 60 Hz 60 Hz 50/60 Hz 50 Hz 50 Hz 60 Hz Max operating current per luminaire2 8.86 A 8.52 A 8.06 A 7.71 A 7.39 A 6.40 A 5.11 A 4.67 A 4.43 A 4.27 A 3.70 A Footnotes: 1) Rated wattage is the power consumption, including driver efficiency losses, at stabilized operation in 25°C ambient temperature environment. 2) Operating current includes allowance for 0.90 minimum power factor, operating temperature, and LED light source manufacturing tolerances. Notes 1. Use thermal magnetic HID-rated or D-curve circuit breakers. 2. See Musco Control System Summary for circuit information. U.S. and foreign patent(s) issued and pending • ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC • TLC-LED-1500 5700K 75 CRI • M-2955-en04-3 Datasheet: TLC-LED-1500 Luminaire and Driver www.musco.com · lighting@musco.com 2 ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 48 ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC · 184054 · M-3461-en04-1 Solutions for Lighting · TLC for LED® SEVERANCE HIGH SCHOOL Severance, Colorado, USA 50 footcandles (500 lux), 2:1 uniformity System energy comparison: 73.6 kW – 75% reduction compared to typical HID equipment ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 49 ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC · 184054 · M-3462-en04-1 Solutions for Lighting · TLC for LED® SEVERANCE HIGH SCHOOL Severance, Colorado, USA 50 footcandles (500 lux), 2:1 uniformity System energy comparison: 73.6 kW – 75% reduction compared to typical HID equipment ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 50 ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC · 184054 · M-3463-en04-1 Solutions for Lighting · TLC for LED® SEVERANCE HIGH SCHOOL Severance, Colorado, USA 50 footcandles (500 lux), 2:1 uniformity System energy comparison: 73.6 kW – 75% reduction compared to typical HID equipment ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 51 ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC · 184054 · M-3464-en04-1 Solutions for Lighting · TLC for LED® SEVERANCE HIGH SCHOOL Severance, Colorado, USA 50 footcandles (500 lux), 2:1 uniformity System energy comparison: 73.6 kW – 75% reduction compared to typical HID equipment ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 52 SAMPLE 25-Year Product Assurance & Warranty Program ™ ©2005, 2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC M-1291-enUS-11 - Page 1 of 2 - Project name:_______________________________________________________________ Project number:________________ Owner:___________________________________________________ City:___________________________ State:___________ Covered product(s):_________________________________________________________________________________________ Date issued:__________________________________________ Expiration:___________________________________________ Musco Sports Lighting, LLC will provide all materials and labor to maintain operation of your lighting system to original design criteria for 25 years. Musco products and services are guaranteed to perform on your project as detailed in this document. Light Performance Specified illumination levels will be maintained and are marked as guaranteed in the Musco Illumination Summary. Individual luminaire outages that occur during the warranty and maintenance period are repaired when the usage of any field is materially impacted. Spill Light Control If specified, spill light levels at identified locations are guaranteed to be controlled to the maximum values provided in the Musco Illumination Summary. Energy Consumption Total average kW consumption for your lighting system is guaranteed to be not more than the total load shown in the Musco Illumination Summary. Monitoring, Maintenance, and Control Services Musco shall monitor the performance of your lighting system, including on/off status, hours of usage, and luminaire outages. If outages that affect playability are detected, Musco will contact you and proactively dispatch technicians. On-off control of your lighting system is provided via an easy-to-use web site scheduling system, smartphone app, phone, email, or fax. Our trained Control-Link Central™ service center staff is available toll-free 24/7. Regular usage reports are always available on Control-Link Central’s web site. Structural Integrity Your project has been designed to __________________________________________________________________ . Structural integrity of equipment manufactured by Musco is guaranteed. 0XVFRKDVDWHDPRISHRSOHWRHQVXUHIXOÀOOPHQWRIRXUSURGXFWDQGVHUYLFHVZDUUDQW\DQGPDLQWDLQVÀQDQFLDO UHVHUYHVGHGLFDWHGWRVXSSRUWRXUIXOÀOOPHQWRIWKLVZDUUDQW\3OHDVHNHHSWKLVGRFXPHQWDV\RXUVLJQHG contract guaranteeing comprehensive service for the 25 year period. SAMPLE ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 53 SAMPLE 25-Year Product Assurance & Warranty Program ™ ©2005, 2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC M-1291-enUS-11 - Page 2 of 2 - Terms and Conditions Service under this Contract is provided by Musco Sports Lighting, LLC (“Musco”) or an authorized servicer approved by Musco. Services performed under this Contract shall consist of furnishing labor and parts necessary to restore the operation of the Covered Product(s) to original design criteria provided such service is necessitated by failure of the Covered Product(s) during normal usage. This Contract covers Product(s) consisting of Musco’s Total Light Control – TLC for LED® with Control-Link® and any additional Musco manufactured product as listed on page 1. “We”, “us,” and “our” mean Musco. “You” and “your” mean the purchaser of the Covered Product(s). No one has the authority to change this Contract without the prior written approval of Musco. Musco shall not assume responsibility for their agents or assignees other than as described below. If there is a conflict between the terms of this Contract and information communicated either orally or in writing by one or more of our employees or agents, this Contract shall control. Additional Provisions 1. Availability of Service: Control-Link Central™ operators shall be available 24/7 via web site, phone, fax, or email. Maintenance service specialists shall be available 8AM to 5PM Central Time, and services shall be rendered during these same hours in your local time zone, Monday through Friday (with the exception of national holidays). Hours of operation are subject to change without notice to you. Musco will exercise all reasonable efforts to perform service under this Contract, but will not be responsible for delays or failure in performing such services caused by adverse weather conditions, acts of any government, failure of transportation, accidents, riots, war, labor actions or strikes or other causes beyond its control. 2. Determination of Repairs: Musco will utilize the field monitoring system and any information provided by the customer to determine when the usage of the field is materially impacted. From this information, Musco will determine needed repair and/or replacement of Covered Product(s) and parts. Repair will be with Product(s) of like kind and quality. 3. Your Requirements Under this Contract: You must meet all electrical and installation requirements as specified by the manufacturer. In addition, you promise and assure: full cooperation with Musco, Musco’s technicians and authorized servicers during telephone diagnosis and repair of the Covered Product(s); reasonable accessibility of the Covered Product(s); a nonthreatening and safe environment for service. You agree to check fuses and to replace fuses as needed. Musco provides spare fuses in the lowest alpha-numeric numbered enclosure. Musco will replenish spare fuses used. You agree to keep your control system online. This means keeping the required control voltage to the control system at all times. Any deviation from this practice must be discussed with Musco’s Warranty Department. 4. Service Limitations — This Contract does not cover: Maintenance, repair, or replacement necessitated by loss or damage resulting from any external causes such as, but not limited to, theft, environmental conditions, negligence, misuse, abuse, improper electrical/power supply, unauthorized repairs by third parties, attachments, damage to cabinetry, equipment modifications, vandalism, animal or insect infestation, physical damage to Covered Product(s) parts or components, failure of existing structures, supporting electrical systems or any non-Musco equipment, or acts of God/nature (including, but not limited to: earthquake, flood, tornadoes, typhoons, hurricanes, or lightning). 5. Contract Limitations: a. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE: IN NO EVENT WILL MUSCO BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, ANY DELAY IN ©2017 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC · 141024 · M-2291-enUS-2 · Energy consumption based on complete installation Solutions Solutions for for Lighting Lighting What Matters in Lighting Technology Light Control Musco: what can be What often is TOTAL LIGHT CONTROL — TLC FOR LED ™ OTHER LED MANUFACTURER LIGHT LEVEL ENERGY CONSUMPTION 75 horizontal footcandles (750 lux) 103.5 kW 75 horizontal footcandles (750 lux) 127 kW ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 55 From: Sandy Cochran <sancochran@msn.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 4:31 PM To: Kai Kleer <kkleer@fcgov.com> Subject: Letter to Planning and Zoning Board regarding Prospect School Development Dear Planning and Zoning members, We are writing this letter to you in hopes you will listen to and understand our concerns with this project. There will be enormous impacts to my neighbors in Kitchell Estates but with our house only 68 feet from the property line, the impact to us will be an unbearable hardship. The noise from the ball fields as well as the indirect light from the 80 foot poles and the traffic 100 feet from our kitchen window during the morning, the afternoon, the weekends and throughout the summer are far from the definition of compatibility in the Land Use Code. For traffic engineers the traffic on the access road only reaches an acceptable level of service C. But for us it is 49 vehicles, 18 of which are large buses coming in and 13 buses trying to get back out every morning for 5 days a week. It is repeated every afternoon – buses trying to get in to pick up students and as many as 18 buses and 30 staff vehicles leaving on that road. If there are athletic games and practices on the north fields, as many as if not more than 54 vehicles could be driving in and out of the parking lot by our house and horse barn. This could go on after school as well as in the evenings, weekends, and throughout the summer months. A solid wood fence with some trees are planned for mitigation. Have you sat in your fenced backyard and heard the traffic passing on your street? Imagine that with 49 vehicles, 18 of which are big school buses. The fence won’t even shield the tall buses from view. You set up for a bar-b-que and find your guests’ conversation drowned out by the announcer and cheering crowd from your neighbors playing fields. This also includes the noise of cars coming and going, doors slamming, people talking and shouting in the adjacent parking lot that isn’t shielded by a wooden fence. Safety wise it has been suggested that we avoid getting in and out of our driveway during these congested morning and afternoon times because the access road is only 180 feet from our driveway. The Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS) states driveways should be at least 460 feet and up to 660 feet apart with a need of 400 feet to stop a vehicle safely going 45 MPH on a 2 lane arterial. With our horse trailer we will always worry that someone will pull out of the access road turning left, not seeing us also pulling out and not have the needed distance to stop. After all, we are talking young high school drivers, distracted by passengers or their cell phone that attend practices and games. We ask that you seriously look in the Land Use Code under 3.5.1. Purpose: “to ensure that the physical and operational characteristic of proposed buildings and uses are compatible when considered within the context of the surrounding area.” 3.5.1 (j) Operational/Physical Compatibility Standards Conditions may be imposed upon the approval of development applications to ensure that new development will be compatible with existing neighborhoods and uses. Such conditions may include, but need not be limited to, restrictions on or requirements for: (1) hours of operation and deliveries ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 56 (2) location on a site of activities that generate potential adverse impacts on adjacent uses such as noise and glare 1. light intensity and hours of full illumination Also under LUC 1.2.2 Purpose (M) ensuring the development proposals are sensitive to the character of existing neighborhoods Below are requests we are asking you to consider: - Our first choice would be to have the access road moved further south. - Have the solid wooden fence definitely be at least 8 feet tall and make it run the entire length of the Kitchell Estate properties (Larimer County Planner’s comment, “…should consider need for solid fencing along north property boundary”) - Remove the 54 space parking lot adjacent to our south west property line. The Wellington School site that is very similar to this layout does not have this type of parking lot even though there is room. This lot’s impact to the neighbors seems to out weigh its need. It definitely does not meet the definition of compatibility of the adjacent neighborhood. That neighborhood has livestock that will be impacted. - Limit the time the playing fields can be lit and possibly used so they aren’t utilized late into the night. We have lived in our home for 15 years. We knew the school owned the neighboring property but never in our wildest dreams did we envision a project of this magnitude. This area is zoned low density urban estates. If you look through the permitted uses under this zone your mind doesn’t think of a 250,000 square foot building with a 4,000 seat stadium. The road running along the northern property line was marked as an emergency/ maintenance road meaning limited use. Then in August PSD personnel came to our house and asked if we would share our driveway with them. When asked what would travel this access road they said it would be temporarily used for buses and staff until the Prospect entrances were built. It concerned us even on a temporary basis. We declined sharing our driveway. Later we learned this road would be a permanent access for buses and staff. At the September 10th , PSD Board meeting a staff member again stated it will be used temporarily by buses until such time those other roadways are opened up. He went on to say it will not be a permanent full time access for anything other than maintenance, two days later at the neighborhood meeting we were told this road would permanently be used for up to 20 buses and up to 100 staff members. At your work session last Friday the city planner stated twice the buses would come in at Prospect and Mc Laughlin dropping students off on the west side of the building. He also talked about buses using the north access road next to our property. We have been actively involved in this process since August and it is getting confusing and frustrating. The impact of this road on us will be enormous especially since it is hard to tell what exactly will happen. baord We are requesting if this road is not moved further south, that you would suggest to PSD they return it to its original purpose, which was an emergency/maintenance road. If they refuse that suggestion please have them consider not having staff use this road as their impact on McLaughlin will be negligible since they are required to arrive one half hour before the students. The buses can leave on McLaughlin since most of the traffic will be over by then. ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 57 We appreciate your reading this letter. We plan on attending your meeting on Thursday where Sandy will be reiterating what our concerns are with a small 3 minute window. We are hoping that the visuals aids used at your meeting show the surrounding neighborhoods, including our house and property. This will help show how close our house is in proximity to the north access road and the 54 space parking lot(about the length of a soccer field). Sincerely, Brad and Sandy Cochran 1225 South County Road 5, Fort Collins, CO 80524 970-217-5815 ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 58 ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 59 ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 60 ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 61 ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 62 ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 63 December 18, 2019 Letter to the City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Board Members It’s challenging to formulate and provide meaningful input on this project. Most of us are not architects, designers or engineers. But we offer a unique perspective, which is why the process seeks our input. Indeed our lives will be affected every day by many aspects of this school. My main concern right from the start has been traffic. You all need to know it is already bad and more than 800 new homes will soon be built within a couple of miles. I will bring up a new concern of mine and then circle back to traffic. I dug into the Land Use Code, as I have done to understand several projects in the past. Although the school and stadium are technically permitted uses, when considering the intent of the Urban Estates District, to say that this campus is compatible with existing subdivisions is beyond a stretch. In truth, nothing about it is really compatible. Not the buildings, not the stadium, not the traffic. City of Fort Collins Land Use Code Division 3.5 - Building Standards • 3.5.1 - Building and Project Compatibility Purpose . The purpose of this Section is to ensure that the physical and operational characteristics of proposed buildings and uses are compatible when considered within the context of the surrounding area. Compatibility shall be achieved through techniques such as the repetition of roof lines, the use of similar proportions in building mass and outdoor spaces, similar relationships to the street, similar window and door patterns and/or the use of building materials that have color shades and textures similar to those existing in the immediate area of the proposed infill development. Brick and stone masonry shall be considered compatible with wood framing and other materials. Building Color . Color shades shall be used to facilitate blending into the neighborhood and unifying the development. The color shades of building materials shall draw from the range of color shades that already exist on the block or in the adjacent neighborhood. • Division 4.2 - Urban Estate District (U-E) Purpose . The Urban Estate District is intended to be a setting for a predominance of low-density and large-lot housing. The main purposes of this District are to acknowledge the presence of the many existing subdivisions which have developed in these uses that function as parts of the community and to provide additional locations for similar development, typically in transitional locations between more intense urban development and rural or open lands. I appreciated the opportunity to attend last week's work session. I listened and learned a lot. I also gained appreciation for an aspect of this project that is concerning that I had not focused on until I heard the project characterized by a Board member as "penitentiary-like". This hit me like a ton of bricks. Cold, grey bricks. If this project were in one of our river canyons, grey would be an earth tone. It is not an earth tone east of I-25, the edge of the beautiful plains in our county. Most definitions of earth tone include brown as a predominant shade. So it makes sense that most large buildings are shades of brown, tan, beige, buff and sandstone. ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 64 When we left the work session, we drove down Mulberry and then I-25 and for miles, I looked on both sides of the road and saw only one grey building. It happened to have rust accents. It was unattractive and did not fit in with the predominance of surrounding earth tone buildings. The buildings on Mulberry, the hotels, the other businesses, and on down I-25, including MCR, Centerra and on, are all earth tones. They are NOT grey, they are not white and they are definitely not black. I request the architects explain how the design of this massive building with its cold, grey brick and rust accents fits in with the existing surrounding neighborhoods. It appears to be the opposite, incompatible. Please explain. Another point raised by the Board was the uninviting, uncelebratory design of the entrance. It is lackluster and a disappointment in what should be a PSD showpiece. There are important missed opportunities here. PSD has a rare opportunity to create a beautiful, warm, inviting campus. Whatever it ends up looking like, either way, it will be PSD's regional showpiece, indeed, as travelers drive up and down I-25, it will be seen by many. How unfortunate if they look over to the east, puzzled, wondering, "What IS this building that appears to stick out like a sore thumb?" Consider how this cold grey building will look on this vast expanse during the winter, with no green grass or foliage to lend a pleasing, softening element for the eye. I ask the architects to "go back to the drawing board" and at least select a warmer, tan/beige or sandstone color for the bricks. Consider the colors of the City buildings, especially the beautiful Planning building, and many CSU campus buildings, including the attractive new Aggie Village on Prospect. There are many examples of attractive civic architecture in our city. Look to them for inspiration. Circling back to traffic. At the end of the day, what the school looks like isn’t going to affect my life. But if the traffic coming to and from the school isn't functional, if the two entrances to campus remain side by side just feet apart on Prospect, that will affect my life and the lives of many others every day. People trying to enter the campus. People trying to leave. People just trying to use Prospect, as they always have, to get into town. They will face chaos and gridlock in this short corridor. People take rash, unsafe action on the road out of desperation when facing such conditions. Board members, please don't think it's too late to correct this nightmare. We are counting on you to have the resolve to send the message loud and clear to respect the surrounding, established neighborhoods and their residents and serve their needs. I ask this Board to take responsible action and ask the applicant to address these issues while there is still time. Solutions exist. There IS still time - the first shovel has not gone in the ground. Thank you, Cheri Nichols 1601 Meadowaire Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Cherix1@aol.com ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 65 From: Kathy Schmidtke <kathy.schmidtke1976@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 12:19 PM To: Kai Kleer <kkleer@fcgov.com> Cc: kathy.schmidtke1976@gmail.com; Karla Younessi <kyounessi@gmail.com> Subject: Additional PSD High School Proposal Feedback Good afternoon Kai – Sorry for the delay and short notice of this email. With the holidays it has been crazy (as I am sure you know). Below is the email that we originally sent with our comments on the PSD school project and they still apply even after most current submittal from PSD. In addition, we would like to add the following comments for the Planning & Zoning meeting: Continuation of 2 below: We would expect the landscape buffer along our property line to be the exact same width and scope, as is being given to the other Kitchell homeowners. Currently the plans show the road right next to our property line for approximately 40 to 60 feet with ZERO landscape buffer. This is unacceptable especially since the buffer has been added for the rest of the Kitchell homeowners thus we believe it can also be accomplished for our property. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks in advance for your assistance getting our feedback included and we will look forward to seeing you on Thursday evening. Kathy and Gregg Schmidtke 4607 Kitchell Way Fort Collins, CO 80524 From: Kathy Schmidtke <kathy.schmidtke1976@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2019 8:18 AM To: Kai Kleer <kkleer@fcgov.com> Cc: kathy.schmidtke1976@gmail.com Subject: PSD High School Proposal Feedback Hello and good morning Kai – Sorry for the delay in getting this email written after your excellent review meeting of the NEW PSD school site on east Prospect Road. We live at 4607 Kitchell Way which is the furthest house/lot west and on the south side. For the last year we have been working our own mitigation plan to minimize impact of the PSD development by ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 66 planting (and planning to plant) many hundreds of seedling trees. While they won’t block the stadium for some years they will eventually and the timeline required for them to grow is acceptable for us. There are a couple of things we think the school district also needs to do to help mitigate impacts to the surrounding rural neighbors: 1) Expand the traffic study to be holistic to the actual rural infrastructure around the whole section. This will be the only high school in PSD that is placed in an area with rural road infrastructure (no traffic signals except at I-25, no bike lanes or even shoulders on County Rd 5, excessive speeds, etc.) and this will pose a danger for the students, parents, faculty and for all the surrounding neighbors. The traffic study and associated mitigation should include from County Rd 5 north to Highway 14 AND south to Timnath, I-25 on the west and Prospect to south. The safety of all is dependent on more than turn lanes into school and a light at County Rd 5 and Prospect. We have said many times we expect there will be at least one fatality accident based on the current and planned traffic changes/infrastructure improvements because they don’t address the reality of this location and which will only get progressive worse with all the development in the surrounding area. 2) Move what was to be the emergency access road further south in the development. When it was going to be emergency/maintenance only it was fine to be close to the north property line but since it will now support and be required to sustain extensive bus, parents, faculty, and sports traffic it should be 30 – 40’ south on the north property line and the County Rd 5 access needs to be moved to the center of the development (further south than existing proposal). With over 130+ acres it is not unreasonable to ask for a sufficient buffer, appropriate easement and traffic safety mitigation on County Rd 5. With the already NEW planned traffic for the access road and we sincerely believe the future traffic from the many parents that will also use the road to drop students at the planned parking area by the ball fields (yes, we know this isn’t a “planned use” but we know it will happen) this will create a REALLY dangerous traffic situation on County Rd 5 that PSD and the traffic study are NOT addressing. 3) Finally, we would like the fence planned for the north of the PSD property to be placed 3 – 10’ off the property line to the south (or whatever distance is needed) so that the school district can clean up all the debris that will collect on the north side of the fence. Since this is a rural area there are plenty of tumble weeds, corn stalks, consumer and construction trash. We understand that at some future date this will be less of an issue but will exist for many years until trees begin to catch all the windblown “stuff” and the whole section is developed (the White’s property) but there will always be some amount of trash that collects on the north side of the fence that PSD needs to manage. Thanks in advance for including our feedback and please feel free to contact us if you have any questions, etc. Gregg and Kathleen Schmidtke 970-420-7195 ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 67 Letter to the City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Board Members December 18, 2019 RE:PSO high school/middle school project at Prospect and Cr. 5 From: Jill Handwerk and Peter Weber, 1733 Meadowaire Dr. As a 30+ year residents of Meadowaire Dr., we are deeply concerned about the impacts of the proposed high school/middle school on both the safety and quality of life in our neighborhood. Specifically: • Traffic flow on Prospect and CR 5 at peak hours with proposed student access points off of Prospect • Congestion and safety issues from the two proposed student access points on Prospect within X mile; all other high schools have two access points but on separate streets; we request elimination of Meadowaire access point and consideration of student access points on either CR 5 or the west side of the PSD site to reduce traffic pressure on Prospect • Cut through traffic on Meadowaire Dr. from CR 5 and/or Prospect, if the currently proposed design is implemented • Ensure that intersection of Prospect and CR S upgrades with signal lights and left and right turn lanes in all directions be fully functional PRIOR to school opening • Ensure that the intersection of Prospect and Mclaughlin upgrades with signal light and left and right turn lanes in all directions be fully functional PRIOR to school opening • Have PDS provide in writing a plan detailing how cut through traffic on Meadowaire and or/Carriage will be monitored for impacts, and provide a mechanism to pay for traffic calming measures when needed; we do not want the failure of PDS to be proactive to result in death or injury to people or pets • Light pollution from athletic field and score boards • Ensure night sky standards are followed as outlined in the City of Fort Collins and Timnath and Larimer County Design Team response dated Oct. 29, 2019. • Compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods zoned as Urban Estate District, as defined in the City of Fort Collins Land Use and Building Codes: • The proposed design and building materials are not compatible with the surrounding area, as required by the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code in that the building materials DO NOT have color shades and textures similar to those in the immediate area. We ask that the exterior of the proposed school be in shades of light brown rather than gray or black to be more compatible with the surrounding area, and to be more welcoming to students and staff. Thank you for your consideration. Jill Handwerk Peter Weber ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 68 Eric Gardner, Homestead Estates Neighborhood My comment refers to the traffic flow and the possibility of traffic calming in neighborhoods adjacent to the new proposed school. The current design shows only two entrances to the campus both of which are on Prospect, one signaled (McLaughlin) referred as the West Entrance and one un-signaled (Meadowaire) referred as the East Entrance. We feel this traffic pattern will be highly problematic. No other high school has their entrances off a single road, they all exit to multiple streets. Additionally, in the current design these two entrances are less than 3 tenths of a mile apart. As we know, Prospect is a main thoroughfare into the City with its own high traffic demands not related to the school. When the stadium on this design is used, this single road traffic flow will compare to French Field. If anyone has ever been to a sporting event, they know just how difficult this is to exit this stadium. The current view point the PSD takes on traffic calming in neighborhoods is they wait and see if it is needed. If traffic is dispersed between multiple roads which would be consistent with other high schools this could eliminate the need for traffic calming in the surrounding neighborhoods. ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 69 I have approximately 20 years of volunteering with the PSD and was heavily involved with opening Fossil Ridge HS. So, I can speak knowledgeably about some things. Traffic in the area of a HS will be a huge problem for the neighborhood, plus the 1,000 plus new houses being built in the area…. trying to get out of Homestead Estates safely will literally be a nightmare. • Student drivers are very inexperienced and usually mostly concerned with getting where they want to go as quickly as possible, and not so much concerned with getting there safely. (The parking lot at Rocky Mountain HS was averaging 3 fender-benders a day during the lunch hour rush.) • The main road into Fossil Ridge included a round-a-bout. The first day of school was horrible – kids were almost an hour late to class because traffic backed up so bad. The second day of school traffic at the round-a-bout was great because all the kids avoided it and took the faster route through the neighborhoods. • Student cars parked on campus are subject to search for drugs, alcohol, weapons, etc. Anyone with these items in their cars will be parking in the nearby neighborhoods. Parents not wanting to get trapped in the school parking lots with limited entrances/exits will be parking in the neighborhoods for student pick-ups, school events, athletic events, etc. • Despite what the City of Fort Collins Traffic Representative thinks – traffic will not be limited to 15 minutes before and after school. Students will be driving in and out all day for doctor appointments, work, open periods, off campus lunch, before school activities, after school activities, sports practices, etc. Parents will be driving in and out for those things as well. There will be traffic in the evenings and weekends for athletic events, school performances, community events, etc. • The high school may or may not have the same start time as the middle school. The new later start for high school may very well be at the same time as neighborhood residents are leaving for work, taking kids to school, etc. We could have 1,000 plus residents trying to leave the area on two roads at the same time 1,000 plus students are trying to arrive in the area on the same two roads. Then there will be the extra traffic from commuters using Prospect to get into Fort Collins. Plus when are accidents on I-25, drivers exit and use Prospect to get into Fort Collins. ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 70 • The PSD representatives have already been making comments about how they can’t / won’t be responsible for anything off their 100-acre campus. Their students will be leaving campus to smoke, drink, loiter, do drugs, and even have sex. My sister lives across the street from a high school and you would not believe the kind of trash she has found in her yard. The school staff will not be helpful at all in controlling student behavior in the neighborhoods. • A friend of mine lives 3 blocks away from Rocky Mountain High School. At 7:00 p.m. on a Wednesday night the loudspeakers from French Field are clearly hearable from her property. Living across Prospect from the new athletic complex will be very unpleasant, especially without some sort of sound barrier. These fields will be used at least 9 months a year, probably on a 6-day a week basis. Plus, the lights are going to quite an intrusion. These are some of the issues that we are sure will happen after the school is completed that are not adequately addressed in any communications we have seen or read. That the traffic issues for Meadowaire and Carriage Road are the problems of Timnath or someone else is not an unacceptable answer. The access points for the school and traffic control systems need to be decided on before the school is built, not after serious problems /accidents have occurred. The noise issues with the stadium and other issues are a serious concern and we would like to see some plan on how they will be addressed. Thank you for considering these problems. Lynette Rubenthaler / Dave Rubenthaler Homestead Estates Residents for over 30 years ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 71 Letter to the City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Board Members December 18,2019 RE: PSD High School/Middle School Project at Prospect and CR 5 My husband Randy and I have lived on Meadowaire Drive since 1990. Up until a few years ago growth was slow and controlled. Recently the growth has exploded and is seriously impacting our neighborhood. The proposed school project has us greatly concerned. We would never expect our country living neighborhood would remain unchanged but the traffic on Prospect Road is very heavy now and will only get worse with the proposed school development. A school entrance across from Meadowaire Drive with no signal will make the traffic flow difficult anytime students are present. We would encourage you to look at alternatives to two entrances off of Prospect - Either from Co Road 5 or from west of the property. Another serious traffic issue is school traffic on Meadowaire Dr. If there is an access point across from Meadowaire it would be silly to assume students will not use Meadowaire to connect to County Road 5. Poudre School District must own the solution if this occurs. We are also concerned about the visual appearance of the school. The current color scheme of gray is stark and uninviting. You have an opportunity to create a lovely state of the art regional academic facility. This regional school is going to be a large building seen from I - 25 and the surrounding neighborhoods that are zoned Urban Estate. The Urban Estate zone is a transition from urban to rural.. We encourage you to require the building materials and colors be warm earth tones to be compatible and blend with the environment. Thank you for your consideration, Edie and Randy Stout 1801 Meadowaire Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 randestout@gmail.com ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 72 Dear Kacee Scheidenhelm, I wanted to briefly express our concerns regarding the proposed school traffic access points. Knowing there is never a solution that will resolve concerns of everyone, we do feel the location of the two major access points on Prospect are a major concern. The U.S. Department of Justice office of Community Oriented Policing Services addresses Problems associated with Traffic Congestion around Schools. This document mainly addresses responses that may mitigate the existing problems associated with existing congestion. We have the opportunity to address these problems in the planning stages and yet we don’t feel the traffic study and access points currently planned are at locations which will minimize the impact on already stressed Prospect Road traffic. From this referenced study, we learned that the middle school will contribute the majority of traffic issues from parent drop-off and pick-up trips. High school student driver issues are more easily addressed with school rules or requirements according to the report. The design location for the teacher and bus locations make sense away from the other two access points, but having the two highest use access points off of the Prospect Road north side and within such a short distance doesn’t make sense. The west-bound Prospect traffic currently backs up to the planned Meadowaire entrance before any additional school traffic. Moving the Meadowaire entrance to the west side of the property would spread the traffic to where it would seem manageable and would mitigate these concerns. Thanks, Rick and Meredith Splittgerber Corner of Meadowaire and Prospect. Richard Splittgerber ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 73 Eric Gardner, Homestead Estates Neighborhood My comment refers to the traffic flow and the possibility of traffic calming in neighborhoods adjacent to the new proposed school. The current design shows only two entrances to the campus both of which are on Prospect, one signaled (McLaughlin) referred as the West Entrance and one un-signaled (Meadowaire) referred as the East Entrance. We feel this traffic pattern will be highly problematic. No other high school has their entrances off a single road, they all exit to multiple streets. Additionally, in the current design these two entrances are less than 3 tenths of a mile apart. As we know, Prospect is a main thoroughfare into the City with its own high traffic demands not related to the school. When the stadium on this design is used, this single road traffic flow will compare to French Field. If anyone has ever been to a sporting event, they know just how difficult this is to exit this stadium. The current view point the PSD takes on traffic calming in neighborhoods is they wait and see if it is needed. If traffic is dispersed between multiple roads which would be consistent with other high schools this could eliminate the need for traffic calming in the surrounding neighborhoods. ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 74 Dear Ms. Scheidenhelm, Due to a prior engagement, I unfortunately will not be able to attend the PSD meeting tonight, which will go over plans for the new school project off East Prospect. Therefore, I wanted to express my concerns with the current plans in writing as I will not be able to help represent our neighborhood this evening. I am an occupational therapist that works with special education students in rural school districts around northern Colorado. I certainly see the need all over northern Colorado for bigger and/or more school buildings to support the growing population. I support the overall school plan, but would like to propose some changes to lessen the impact on local residents. I own a home at 1700 Meadowaire Drive, four houses down from Prospect Road. The current plans, which have two school entrances being built onto Prospect, have me very worried about traffic flow, especially with one of the entrances proposed to be at Meadowaire Drive. As we all know, Fort Collins is growing at a rapid rate, which includes homes being developed east of I-25. Traffic is already extremely congested at our intersection during typical rush hour times before and after a typical work day, which coincides with the start and end of a school day. I have timed how long it takes me to onto the interstate from my home several times during non-rush hour times. When driving the speed limit, it takes anywhere from 2 to 3 1/2 minutes to get onto the I-25 South ramp. When trying to leave my home for work between 7 and 7:30 in the morning, traffic is often backed up to Meadowaire Drive, if not beyond. This turns a 2-3 minute drive, to travel less than 1/2 a mile, into a 30 minute drive. The widening of Prospect Road and the construction happening on the I-25 bridge is currently necessary to sustain traffic flow just with the current growth related to the number of homes and apartment complexes being built on this end of town. Can you imagine what will happen when the city adds 1,500 students to this one concentrated area? The current plans concern me for several reasons. 1. As a homeowner, I do not want the city to encourage parents/guardians to use a residential road (Meadowaire Drive) as an outlet when entering or leaving the school by creating an entrance on Meadowaire Drive. 2. I am concerned about safety issues with such a high number of students being projected to need transportation to school and with both entrances being planned on the same road. I would like PSD to consider eliminating an entrance to the school right at a residential road, and look instead at creating a main entrance on County Road 5, and even creating a 3rd entrance on the western border of the school. Thank you for considering the concerns of residential neighbors and for working with us on creating a plan that will work for all parties. I look forward to hearing how the committee handles these concerns. With great regard, Dr. Nicole Miller 1700 Meadowaire Drive (303) 552-4042 ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 75 Hello my name is Christie Juhl and I have lived in the Homestead Estates subdivision on the Southwest corner of Prospect and County Road 5 for almost 12 years. It was shortly after we purchased our home that I was informed that the Poudre School District owned the land across the street from us. I was excited! Being the mother of 6 I thought, “How convenient!” That changed when the site was being looked at for the PSD bus barn. I was grateful when the district decided that this location was not a good option for that purpose. I am again excited about the school being so convenient to us but have serious concerns about the safety of not only my own children but others in our neighborhood, children in the other existing subdivisions as well as those being built and future developments. I have been to many of the schools in the district that my children have either attended or had some sort of game, concert or other kind of event at. At all these schools whether picking up, dropping off or at a special event the traffic is always a concern. When the school opens, I know that it will start as both a middle school and high school. This means that there will be children as young as 11 years old possibly walking to school. This to me is frightening when I look at the plans and the lack of sidewalks and crosswalks that are in the design. From what we have been told the south side of Prospect Road is not being expanded or improved and there are currently no sidewalks. This will be an issue and it is one that should be addressed before the school opens. Driving to this school is also a concern to me. I know in the past there have been situations where the foresight was not there, and it was not until many accidents had happened that the problem was addressed. The specific location I am speaking about is the intersection of Lady Moon and Kechter, by Fossil Ridge High School. There were numerous accidents including my next-door neighbor’s daughter before that light was installed. As an experienced driver, I have a hard time judging when to turn left out our subdivision safely and the increased number of cars that has happened naturally with the increased number of homes east of the interstate makes it even tougher. When we are looking at new drivers and distracted high schoolers, trying to make this judgement is an accident waiting to happen. Cars accelerate quickly when heading west from the County Road 5 and Prospect intersection and the cars heading east don’t start slowing down until the last minute. It has been a little over a year since my son lost one of his best friends at the end of our street on Carriage and Prospect and I do not want another fatality to be the reason we look closer at the traffic and the safest way for our kids to get to school everyday. When looking at these plans, I would ask that you make safety of the citizens number one! Sincerely, Christie Juhl 1701 Carriage Road Fort Collins, CO 80525 ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 76 Dear Ms. Scheidenhelm: RE: Traffic Planning for proposed school Prospect and Country Road 5. Meeting 19 December. Due to prior commitments schedule three months ago, we can not attend the meeting. As I understand the plan, it calls for a stoplight at McLuaghlin Lane and a signed entrance at Meadowaire. I support the Homestead Estates committee that will be presenting at the 19 December that suggests scrapping the entrance across from Meadowaire and the McLaughlin Lane stoplight and considering an entrance off of CR5 and possibly an entrance further west on Prospect. I don’t know what your projected traffic study shows, but Prospect currently has relative heavy traffic of on a morning coming from the north, east, and south. They turn west onto prospect. Undoubtedly, the traffic flow will be considerably heavier and present challenges for the residents of Homestead Estates (Homestead Estates) onto Prospect. About 48 homes are in the Homestead Estates. Turning west from Meadowaire and Carriage Roads onto Prospect, could present major challenges for residents after the school opens. Concerns have also been raised that Homestead Estates residents could see an increase in traffic with cars using Meadowaire and Carriage Roads to avoid stop signs and potential stoplights. Could the planning include the installation of speed bumps and slow speed signs to reduce fast traffic in Homestead Estates. Thank you. Don & Marietta Zimmerman ITEM 4, Correspondence Supplemental Packet Pg. 77 From: Jason Holland To: Tom Leeson; Rebecca Everette; Kacee Scheidenhelm Subject: Odell Wine Project P&Z item - Board question follow-up Date: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 8:50:45 AM Attachments: image001.png Importance: High Hi all, I have follow-up information for the Board’s questions from the work session, outlined below. Also, Odell is wondering if the Board would be comfortable moving this item to the consent agenda? The item doesn’t appear to have compliance issues or controversy. Tivoli Lights: Under the current lighting code, staff considers tivoli lighting to be decorative lighting and we have recommended them for approval on projects in the past within the Downtown zone. Willow Street Apartments and the Exchange on College are both recent examples. Typically this type of decorative lighting is not incorporated into the photometric plan unless there’s a staff concern with light spillover and compatibility with adjacent uses. Zoning staff does enforce this type of lighting so that the decorative lighting is not on all night. For the Odell project, the tivoli lighting will be turned off when they are closed. With the new lighting code, staff is recommending an exemption or variance process for decorative lighting in the Downtown zone. We’re working on the details of that and what the submittal/approval process and standards for decorative lighting would look like. These options will be presented to the Board with the proposed lighting code update. For the retractable wall panel question – the project architect, Rebecca Spears, has confirmed that the project’s “Retractable Wall Panels” at the Covered Patio are designed to be a roll-up transparent vinyl material, and have provided the example photo below from the manufacturer. The architect’s perspective views which suggest a clear view through the panels are an accurate general representation of the proposed character of the panels (attachment 5 in the Board packet). Thank you, ITEM 5, Follow-Up Supplemental Packet Pg. 78 Jason Holland, PLA | City Planner City of Fort Collins 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.224.6126 jholland@fcgov.com ITEM 5, Follow-Up Supplemental Packet Pg. 79 RENDERING SERVICE OR LOSS OF USE DURING THE REPAIR PERIOD OF THE COVERED PRODUCT(S) OR WHILE OTHERWISE AWAITING PARTS. b. Limitation of Liability: To the extent permitted by applicable law, the liability of Musco, if any, for any allegedly defective Covered Product(s) or components shall be limited to repair or replacement of the Covered Product(s) or components at Musco’s option. THIS CONTRACT IS YOUR SOLE EXPRESS WARRANTY WITH RESPECT TO THE COVERED PRODUCT(S). ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE COVERED PRODUCT(S) INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE HEREBY EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED. c. For the purposes of and by your acceptance of this Contract you acknowledge and agree that if a surety bond (“Bond”) is provided the warranty and/or maintenance guarantee provided for in this Contract and any corresponding liability on behalf of the issuing surety under the Bond is limited to the first twelve (12) months of said warranty and/or maintenance guarantee coverage period. Any warranty and/or guarantee coverage period in excess of said initial 12 month period does not fall within the scope of the Bond and shall be the sole responsibility of Musco. d. Musco requires reasonable access for a crane or man lift equipment to service the lighting system. Musco will not be responsible for damage from operating the vehicle on the property when the equipment is operated in the prescribed manner over the designated access route. e. Obsolescence or Environmental Restrictions: If during any maintenance or other work performed under this Warranty, any of the parts of the Covered Product(s) are found to be either obsolete, no longer available, or prohibited by any state of federal agency, Musco shall replace said parts with comparable parts and materials with equal operating characteristics solely at Musco’s discretion. The cost of replacement of any obsolete cellular related technology shall be borne by you. Prior to completing any such work, Musco shall notify you of the cost (if any) you will incur in the replacement of such parts under this section. 6. Transfer and Assignment: Except to owners, you shall not have the right to assign or otherwise transfer your rights and obligations under this Contract except with the prior written consent of Musco; however, a successor in interest by merger, operation of law, assignment or purchase or otherwise of your entire business shall acquire all of your interests under this Contract. 7. Governing Law: Unless otherwise governed by applicable state law, the Contract shall be interpreted and enforced according to the laws of the State of Iowa. 8. Subrogation: In the event Musco repairs or replaces any Covered Product(s), parts or components due to any defect for which the manufacturer or its agents or suppliers may be legally responsible, you agree to assign your rights of recovery to Musco. You will be reimbursed for any reasonable costs and expenses you may incur in connection with the assignment of your rights. You will be made whole before Musco retains any amounts it may recover. Signature: ___________________________________________ Vice President of Sales SAMPLE ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 54 !% "" # !#! ! $ #% ! %$# !# "#$ # ! parameters are used, but holistic lighting moderniazations of legacy applications are possible under this guidelines. 7. Does IDA intend to formally certify and recognize facilities that fully comply with the standards established in the criteria? It is anticipated that in, the next several months, IDA will establish a program that certifies outdoor facilities that fully comply with IDA-Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting. We are currently developing software that will provide preliminary evaluations of facilities and that can be used to guide their design, or retrofit, so that they meet the program’s strict standards. Once a field has been constructed, or retrofit, to these standards, IDA will conduct an on-site verification test to ensure that the facility still complies with the criteria and, if so, will be certified and recognized by IDA as compliant with IDA-Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting. ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 38 !% "" # !#! ! $ #% ! %$# !# "#$ # ! ● Mitigate neighborhood nuisance factors and sky glow which, in turn, provide benefits to the environment, the astronomy community, and others. ● Minimize lumen densities, which reduce energy consumption. 3. For what types of play field is the IDA-Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting appropriate? The criteria specify that only facilities used for soccer, baseball, tennis and other recreational activities typically associated with schools and community parks qualify for consideration. 4. Who should know about the IDA-Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting? To promote lighting that helps protect the nighttime environment, we recommend contacting city council members, community representatives, home owner associations, and parks and recreation authorities to encourage their use of the IDA- Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting when designing or retrofitting playfields. 5. Why do the criteria utilize a maximum allowable correlated color temperature of 5700 kelvin (k) when IDA recommends 3000k for roadway and general area lighting? IDA’s recommendation for correlated color temperature values of outdoor lighting applications have been, and remain, 3000k maximum. Street and area lighting illuminances are established at levels to facilitate safe way-finding and hazard identification, while minimizing light trespass and the disruption of nocturnal habitats. By contrast, sports fields have high levels of human activity and ball speeds where visibility is essential, requiring the allowance for design professional and end user preferences of light sources of up to 5700k. Nonetheless, the use of advanced technologies combined with rigorous design standards, curfews, and variable output controls tailored to the need of the activity, sports lighting facilities can be constructed or retrofit to essentially eliminate light trespass and curtail sky glow, protect nocturnal habitat, moderate neighborhood nuisance glare, and support dark skies. 6. Can the IDA-Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting be achieved with existing installations? Light trespass limitations of the IDA-Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting are stringent, and likely will not be met if older technologies and design Why do the criteria utilize a maximum allowable correlated color temperature of 5700 kelvin (k) when IDA recommends 3000k for roadway and general area lighting? Street and area lighting illuminances are established at levels to facilitate safe way-finding and hazard identification, while minimizing light trespass a By contrast, sports fields have high levels of human activity and ball speeds where visibility is essential, requiring the allowance for design professional and end user preferences of light sources of up to 5700k. sports lighting facilities cann be constructed or retrofit to essentially eliminate light trespass and curtail sky glow, protect nocturnal habitat, moderate neighborhood nuisance glare, and support dark skies. ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 37 !% "" # !#! ! $ #% ! %$# !# "#$ # ! Frequently Asked Questions IDA-Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting 1. Why is IDA creating criteria for IDA Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting? Aren’t you simply “certifying” more light pollution? Since 2007, IDA’s Fixture Seal of Approval (FSA) Program has successfully evaluated roadway, wall pack and walkway luminaires that have been utilized in communities to promote the protection of the nighttime environment. Although successful, the FSA was neither developed nor intended to apply to athletic field lighting, due to the need that the facilities’ luminaries had to be positioned above full cutoff orientations. This resulted in a number of issues and concerns in communities where general lighting practices were promoting dark skies, yet local sporting facilities – which were being lit with non- shielded luminaires – were exacerbating sky glow and light pollution. To encourage the use of the best available technology for dark sky preservation, IDA has established Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting that upholds the values that many communities seek in their public illuminated spaces. These criteria ensure that outdoor sports lighting design minimizes obtrusive light spill and glare into surrounding neighborhoods and natural areas, meets sustainability and climate-friendly goals, and reduces sky glow to the greatest extent practicable. By utilizing IDA’s criteria, communities demonstrate and promote the vision for outdoor sports lighting that simultaneously meets the demanding task of illuminating night-time sports events while preserving night skies. 2. How will the IDA-Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting protect my neighborhood from light pollution? By adopting the IDA-Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting, communities will: ● Minimize neighborhood lighting nuisance by greatly reducing spill and glare disruption. ● Manage high angle glare, thus dramatically decreasing off-site light trespass and sky glow. FSA was neither developed nor intended to apply to athletic field lighting, IDA has established Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting t By utilizing IDA’s criteria, communities demonstrate and promote the vision for outdoor sports lighting that simultaneously meets the demanding task of illuminating night-time sports events while preserving night skies. ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 36 !% "" # !#! ! $ #% ! %$# !# "#$ # ! *# Controls – Provide advanced controls and documentation for the following: a. Automatic and/or remote control system via smartphone apps, or direct remote communication to the company facility responsible for handling the lighting controls, to enforce shut-off at locally established curfew time, not to be later than 11:00 PM (2300 hrs). b. On-site manual and/or remote control system shall also be provided to allow for the lights to be turned on or off at will (before curfew) to assure that only active sports fields are lighted. c. Provide readily accessible controls to implement uniform and variable adaptive illumination levels for different task lighting needs on field, e.g. IES class of play, competition athletics, band practice, striping, mowing, sports practice, etc. Adaptive dimming shall be possible across the range of 25% to 100% of full illumination.2 d. A formal policy defining the appropriate level of illumination necessary for the specific activities and curfew times must be established and enforced. A copy of the policy will be included in the application for the Award of Excellence. 7. Color – Luminaire Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) may not exceed 5700°K, as defined by ANSI C78.377. Luminaire CCT must be determined through empirical measurements as defined by IESNA LM-79 (or CIE equivalent) and performed by a laboratory appropriately accredited by NVLAP. Installation shall be verified by measurement across the target area.3 +# Other Lighting – The installed field lighting is not to be used for illuminating other area tasks. For example, if parking and concession areas lighting is desired, those areas shall be illuminated by separate luminaires and systems not associated with sports field illuminance needs. Other outdoor lighting at the site must, at a minimum, meet the lighting standards and lighting codes established by the community, and must meet the standards set forth in the IDA Model Lighting Ordinance for the relevant lighting zones and tasks. $ ! # " # – Luminaire Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) may not exceed 5700°K, SC CC ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 35 !% "" # !#! ! $ #% ! %$# !# "#$ # ! Lighting Zone Environmental Zone Spill Illuminance at Setback (IESNA RP-33-99) MLO Lighting Zone (IDA Model Lighting Ordinance) E2 – E4 LZ1 – LZ4 # Uplight – All luminaires must be designed such as to not to emit direct light above the horizon, unless required for the activity (i.e. aerial sports) being played. In those cases, only 8% of the total (directly) applied lumens as modeled may be in this zone. For modeling purposes, a horizontal ceiling grid shall be placed 5 feet (1.5 meters) above the top of the tallest pole, extending out to 150 feet (45 meters) beyond the edge of the field to determine compliance. Installation shall not deviate from the design. # Glare – Modeled luminous intensity from any luminaire for any viewing angle at 5’ above grade level, at a distance equal to 150’ beyond the edge of the field shall not exceed 1000 candela (absolute). Luminaires shall not emit more than 250 lumens in the “Very High” glare zone, ranging from 80° to 90° above nadir. This shall be verified through a luminaire photometric report and aiming summary report and visual inspection, or through an equivalent software application and visual inspection.1 (# Lighting Zoning – Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting will only be certified if located in environmental zones E2 through E4, or MLO lighting zone LZ1 through LZ4. Areas especially sensitive to lighting such as E1 or LZ0 are not appropriate for this award program. )# Application Efficiency – The lighting system shall achieve a minimum Application Efficiency of 70 lumens per watt, calculated per the following formula (or the metric equivalent): Target area square footage x Avg. Maintained Design ft-c _______________________________________________ = Applied Lumens/watt Total System Watts ‘‘Target Area’ is defined as the total grid area for the sports field and/or sports court as defined by the IES LM-5-04 IESNA Guide for Photometric Measurements of Area and Sports Lighting Installments (or CIE equivalent guidance). ! ! " # ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 34 !% "" # !#! ! $ #% ! %$# !# "#$ # ! 1. Compliance with all applicable Codes and Standards (e.g. Underwriter Laboratories, CEC, National Building Codes with Local Amendments) '# Target Illumination – Measured on-field illuminance values appropriate for the application per IESNA RP-6-15 Sports and Recreational Area Lighting criteria (or equivalent CIE guidance) together with modeled initial illuminance targets. Only IES Class III & IV level and State High School Lighting Recommendation illumination levels are eligible for the Award of Excellence. To limit over-lighting, the design may vary by no more than 10% above the average target illuminance levels for each Class. 3. As the IES TM-15-11 Luminaire Classification System for Outdoor Lighting is not appropriate for sports lighting, a modified approach to controlling backlight, uplight, and glare is applied with the following metrics: # Backlight – Directionality and application efficiency will be addressed indirectly through two methods that quantify off-site performance, one using the design luminance and another using measured illuminance. Backlight criteria will be difficult to meet without sufficient and appropriate setback of sports fields from the properly line. a. Total designed lumens not contained within the area encompassing the field perimeter and an area immediately adjacent to that area that has a 33 foot (10 meter) offset. As modeled, no more than 15% of the total lumens may be outside of this region. b. Measured spill illuminance values, as measured with the light meter aimed in the direction of the brightest reading, shall not exceed criteria for the respective Environmental Zone (Table 1 below) nor shall it exceed the maximum initial spill illuminance values as modeled and specified in the design process. These measurements shall be taken a distance equal to 150’ beyond the edge of the field. Measurements should be conducted with and without the facility lighting operating so that the sports facility lighting can be isolated from other natural and artificial light sources. Table 1 – Allowable spill illuminance to control backlight ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 33 PARKING STUDENT PARKING ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 32 CARRIAGE PARKWAY MCLAUGHLIN LANE MEADOWAIRE DR CARRIAGE RD STUDENT PARKING PARENT DROP-OFF / PICK UP PARENT DROP-OFF / PICK UP BUS DROP-OFF & PICK UP BUS DROP-OFF & PICK UP BUS DROP-OFF & PICK UP FENCED ATHLETIC FIELDS FENCED STADIUM AREA APPX 1/4 MILE SPACING APPX 1/4 MILE SPACING 12/20/2019 APPX 1/4 MILE SPACING ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 31 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS CTV OHUU CTV CTVC VCOHUU CTV CTV V C OHU TV OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU X OHU OHUU OHU OHXXU OHU OH OHU XXHU OHUU OHUU W X X SSSSS SSSSSS SSSSS SSSS SSSS H2OO H2O H 2OOOOO O OOOO H2O H2O H2O H2O H O H2O 2O 2O22 HH2 H2O HH H2 O WV WWWWWWW H222 2 H2 2O OO 22 H WV WWWWWWWWW O OO OO W H22 H22 H WV WWWW H O OO OO W H22 H22 H WV WWWW H SSSS SS CC C TV TVV M CCC CC CT CC CABLE GGM WW WWWWW CC CCCC E CC MMM MMM CABLE GGGGGMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM C WWW MM CABLE CAABB ABLLEE LE CABLE CABLE CAA AB CABLE TTVVC V VAAUBLEE CAAAULT VAU AULLLTTT AU CABLE MM CAB CABBB BLE CCCCCCCCCC WV W CC GAS GA C CCCCCCC WV WV OH CC CCC WV H X X XX S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS S M B BBB MMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM W MMMM W B M W B M W B M W B M W MMMMM W B M W B M W B M W B M W MS O WWWWWWW MH MHF.F..O. O SSSSSSS C.O. SSSSSSSS SSSSSSSS VAULT VVAULT F.O. VAULT VA VA AULT AUL AAUL AAULT ULT U CABLE CABLLE CC CCCA CCA CA C LE L F.O. A C CABLE CAB E CABLE C CABLE C TELE TE TEE LE WWWWWWWWWW M GAS O VAULT VA T CABLEE C LLE F.F O. LTT LL F.O. F.O. F.O. F.O. F.O. VAULT VVAULT CABLEE CA F.O O. LLEEE U LTT L T F.O. SD SD SD S C.O SD S SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSS FO FO B FO FO O FO E E E E E E E E E E EE EE E EE E E EE E E E EE FO FO T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T G TT G TT G TT G C T C LT FO FO UU FO OH FO F CCCCCC FO OHU FO OHU FO OHU FO OO T FO G G G GG E G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G B FO FO FO FO FO FOO FO FOO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FOO FO FO CC CTVV CTV CC CTV CT T T T T O G FO G G G WW WW WWGG W WWWGGGG E W WWGGGGG WWGGGGG WW GGGGG WWGGGGG W / / OHE FO OHE VV OHE O FO FOCET CT OOOO OHEE OOHHHH HE HH V OHEEEEEEEEE OOOOO EEEE WV W OOOOO E MMMMMMMM W MMMM W M OOOO OHE OHE HE HEE HHEEEEE WW WW WW WW OHE OHH FO OHE F E H2OO H2 OO W WWWWWW WWWWWWWW WWWWW WWWWW W H H2 H 2 WW H22 H2 H 2 WWW 2OO 222222OO 2222 WWWWWWW WWWWWWW WWWWWW WWWWWWW WWWWWWWW WWWWWWW W W W W W W W W OO W W W W W W WWWWWW WWWWW WWWWW WWWWW WWWWWW W W W W W W W W TTVV VVVVVVVVVV H2O H WWW MH V / / / / / / WW / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / X XX XX XX XX XX X XX X X X L CA AAB ABB ABBB TE TEL TEEL L ELE EL LE E OO A O OHU O U FO OHU OHH OOH OOOOOHHHU O HU O H CA WV W W W WW WW WWW OOOOOO W WV V WWW WW WWWWWWW M OOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEE OHEEEEEE OH OOOOOOOOOOHHEE HHH HHHH EEE SS SSSS OOOOOOOOOOOOOO GGGGGGGGG OOOOO HHHHHH T OO HEEEE OOOOOOOHE O OO H 8" 8 W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" 88888888888 " W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" WWWW 8" WWWWWWWWW 8" 8 " WW W 8" 8888 8 WWWW W 8" 8 WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W WWW 8" 8 88 WWW WW 8" 88 888 WWWW W 8" 8 88 " WW W 8" WWWWWWWWWWW 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW 8" W 8" W SS 8" 8 " SS S 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" 88888 " 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS "WW SSSSS SSSSS SS W S 88 S SSSSS W 888 FFF FFF F FF WW WWW WWWW " W S " WW " FF 8"88 " WW W W SSSS SSS / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / S / / / SS / S / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / G / / / G /// / / / G / / / F G FF / / / V A F. W / / / TT / W / / / / / / W / / / / / / WWWW / WW // WW OHE OO H / / OH HE H / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / G / / / / G / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / GG / / / / GG / O / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / G / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / FO / / / / / / / / / / / / / S E FO S OOO OO O / / / OHU / / / C CCC / FO / / / / / / / / / S / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / T / / / / / / T / / / / •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• • ••• •• •• •• •• ••• • •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• • • •• • • • • • •• • •••• ••••• •••• • • •• • • • • • ••• ••• • •• ••• ••• ••• • •• • • ••••• • •••• ••• ••• • •• •• •••••• • •••• ••• •• • •• •• •••••• • •••• ••• ••• •••• • •• •••••• •• •••• ••• ••• • •• • • •••• ••• • •••• ••• ••• • •• •• •••••• • •••• ••• ••• • •• • • ••••• • •••• •• • • • • •• • • • • • • • • ••••• • • ••• • •• • •••• • •• • •••• • •• • •••• • • ••••• • • • • •••••• • • •• • • •• ••• • •• S F W W FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFF •• •• •• •• • •• •• •• •• ••• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• • • •• •• •• •• •• •• ••• •• •• •• •• •• •• • • • • ••••• • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • •• •• • • • • ••• • • •• • • •• •• • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • ••• •• • •• • • •• • • •• • • ••• •• • •• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • •• •• • ••• •• • •• ••••• •• •• ••••• •• • • •• ••••• • •• ••••• • • •• ••••• • •• • •• ••••• •• •••• • XX X XX XXX OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO / 12" W 12" 2 W 12" 2 W 12" WW 12" W 12" W 12" 2 22222222222 22" 2222222222222222222222 " WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W 12" WW 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" 1 W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" 2"2222 "W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" 111 W OOOOOOOO 2 WV W 2 "22222222 2222 22"22222 " SSS S SSSS S SS WV OHE OOOOOOO EEEEE OHEEE OOOOOHHEE OO HH H F W W OOOOO WV WWGG WGG WWWWW WWGG WGG G GG GG W W W OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WW W W W W W HHHEE HHEEEEE HEEEEEE V HH V OH O HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH V OOOOOOOOOOH OOH W W V OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HHH W W W OO SD SD S FO FO FO FO 88888888 FFF W 88 W WW 88888 WW W W WWW W " W 8 W W 88 WW W 8 W F W XX XX X X / / SSSSS FFFF FF FFFF 8 W 8W W WWW W " WWWW " W " 8" 888 W F W 8W 8 8 W 8 WWW 8 " W WWW 8 "WWWW WWW W 8 " WWWW WWW 8 " WW W 8 WWW 8W 8 WWW / 888 WWW WWWWW " WWW 888 WWWWW // SS / / X X X X W 8 W X X X X X XXXX X OOOO XX WW SS WW SS WW SS WWWWWW "S 8" S WW WWW WWW WWW MH XX XXXX XXX XX XXX W 518' 228' W CT CTV / 12" W 107'-1 - 6", C 1 CC / / / 0 / / / 77 R.O.W W . GG R TV TGGGG R TV GGGGGG . 2 WW OO / / / 140' 44 R.R O.WW W /// OO / GGGGGG 66' 66 / 54' 54 H H2OOO OO 56' 56 5666666 11'-7" 13' BLDG. A.3 BLDG. A.5 1 1518' BLDG. A.4 2' 1112' 404' 559' SS SSS 90' 90 900 8" SS BLDG. B.4 ATHLETICS PARKING: 27 (8 H.C.) ATHLETICS PARKING: 8 (1 H.C.) 76'-7" W W W W WW W 863' 78'-6" 252'-1" 123' STUDENT PARKING: 125 STUDENT PARKING: 144 (12 H.C.) STUDENT PARKING: 194 (12 H.C.) STUDENT PARKING: 227 (8 H.C.) STAFF PARKING: 124 (8 H.C.) (FUTURE) STAFF PARKING:28 ATHLETICS PARKING: 54 (2 H.C.) (FUTURE) STUDENT PARKING: 53 (FUTURE) STUDENT PARKING: 66 BLDG. A.1. BLDG. B.1 BLDG. B.2. BLDG. B.3 BLDG. A.2 (LARAMER COUNTY) ZONING: FA1- FARMING LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL (TIMNATH) ZONING: CC- COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LAND USE: AGRICULTURE (TIMNATH) ZONING: R2- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL (LARAMER COUNTY) ZONING: FA1- FARMING LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL (LARAMER COUNTY) ZONING: E1- ESTATE LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL (FORT COLLINS) ZONING: I- INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT LAND USE: PUD (FORT COLLINS) ZONING: I- INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT LAND USE: PUD OWNER: COCHRAN PARCEL ID: 8715006003 OWNER: PETTINE PARCEL ID: 8715006004 OWNER: LAINE PARCEL ID: 8715006005 OWNER: BENDER PARCEL ID: 8715006006 OWNER: CAPE PARCEL ID: 8715006007 OWNER: KUHN PARCEL ID: 8715006008 OWNER: SCHMIDTKE PARCEL ID: 8715006009 OWNER: WHITE PARCEL ID: 8715000009 OWNER: WHITE PARCEL ID: 8715000021 OWNER: TROXELL PARCEL ID: 8722200011 OWNER: ALVAREZ PARCEL ID: 8722200010 OWNER: GRAY PARCEL ID: 8722200018 OWNER: JIRON PARCEL ID: 8722200019 OWNER: SIGNORELLI PARCEL ID: 8722200021 OWNER: EKBLAD PARCEL ID: 8722107701 OWNER: EKBLAD PARCEL ID: 8722107702 OWNER: NICHOLS PARCEL ID: 8722105032 MCLAUGHLIN LN.. MEADOWAIRE DR. OWNER: SPLITTGERBER PARCEL ID: 8722105031 OWNER: RYAN PARCEL ID: 8722105020 OWNER: KNIEVEL PARCEL ID: 8722105019 OWNER: LACY PARCEL ID: 8722105001 CARRIAGE RD. OWNER: HEBBELN PARCEL ID: 8723008016 OWNER: KITCHEL LAKE PARTNERS LLC. PARCEL ID: 8714340003 OWNER: KITCHEL LAKE DEVELOPMENT CORP. PARCEL ID: 8714340002 LOT 'D' OWNER: WHITE PARCEL ID: 8715000009 (SEE LETTER OF INTENT INCLUDED W/ SUBMITTAL FOR PURCHASE AGREEMENT W/ PSD) FUTURE ACCESS ROAD TO CARRIAGE PARKWAY w/ DETACHED SIDEWALKS STADIUM (LIGHTED) COMPETITION FIELD (LIGHTED) TENNIS COURTS PRACTICE FIELD PRACTICE FIELD BASEBALL FIELD (FUTURE LIGHTS) SOFTBALL FIELD (FUTURE LIGHTS) FLEX BALLFIELD ATHLETICS PARKING: 27 (2 H.C.) FUTURE CLASSROOM EXPANSION FUTURE CLASSROOM EXPANSION BLDG. A.7 BLDG. A.6 BLDG. A.9 BLDG. A.8 WWWWWWW WWWWWWW WWWW WWWWWWW W W W W W W W 290'''' CACHE CA CAC ACH CH CHE HE EL ELA L LA AP APO PO POU P POUDRE OUD UDR DRE RE ER ERE RES R RESERVOIR ESE SER ERV RVO VOI OIR OIRRIN RIN INL INLET NLE NLET LET ET TYP. STANDARD PARKING STALL TYP. ADA PARKING STALL 9' 8' 5' 8' 19' ADA AISLE MAIN STREET / COUNTY ROAD NO.5. (2-LANE ARTERIAL, RURAL) FUTURE CARRIAGE PARKWAY (MINOR COLLECTOR) NORTH 0 75' 150' 300' S SCALE C A L E : 1 1"=150' 1 5 0 EAST PROSPECT ROAD (4-LANE ARTERIAL) PARKING DATA OVERALL VEHICLE PARKING ANALYSIS STUDENT - VISITOR PARKING PROPOSED FUTURE STANDARD PARKING STALLS 658 119 HANDICAP PARKING STALLS 32- STAFF PARKING STANDARD PARKING STALLS 116 28 HANDICAP PARKING STALLS 8 - ATHLETICS PARKING STANDARD PARKING STALLS 104 236 HANDICAP PARKING STALLS 12- TOTAL PARKING STALLS 930 383 ULTIMATE PARKING STALL BUILD OUT 1,313 OVERALL BICYCLE PARKING ANALYSIS BICYCLE RACKS 20 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES 220 TYPICAL PARKING STALL LAYOUT BUILDING DATA BUILDING: DESCRIPTION: USE: GROSS: STORIES: A.1 Middle - High School Occupancy: E & Accessory A & B 247,549 sq.ft. Partial 2-Story Level One: 158,090 sq.ft. Level Two: 89,459 sq.ft. A.2 Athletic Out Lot Building Occupancy: A-5 2,221 sq.ft. 1-Story A.3 Irrigation Well Pump House #1 Occupancy: U 76 sq.ft. 1-Story A.4 Irrigation Well Pump House #2 Occupancy: U 76 sq.ft. 1-Story A.5 Irrigation Filter / Control House Occupancy: U 258 sq.ft. 1-Story A.6 Varsity Ball Field Home Dugout Occupancy A-5 330 sq.ft. 1-Story A.7 Varsity Ball Field Visitor Dugout Occupancy A-5 330 sq.ft. 1-Story A.8 Varsity Softball Field Home Dugout Occupancy A-5 330 sq.ft. 1-Story A.9 Varsity Softball Field Visitor Dugout Occupancy A-5 330 sq.ft. 1-Story B.1 District Stadium Team Building Occupancy A-5 12,193 sq.ft. 1-Story B.2 District Stadium Home Team Entry Occupancy A-5 4,693 sq.ft. 1-Story B.3 District Stadium Home Team Entry Occupancy A-5 4,324 sq.ft. 1-Story B.4 District Stadium Press Box Occupancy A-5 2,157 sq.ft. 2-Story Level One: 522 sq.ft. Level Two: 1,635 sq.ft. SITE PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO FINAL UTILITY PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION FOR STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITY MAINS AND SERVICES, PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHY, STREET IMPROVEMENTS. 2. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT AND UTILITY PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EASEMENTS, LOTS, TRACTS, STREETS, WALKS AND OTHER SURVEY INFORMATION. 3.THE PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINAL PLANS. AMENDMENTS TO THE PLANS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS. 4. ALL ROOFTOP AND GROUND MOUNTED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST BE SCREENED FROM VIEW FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS. IN CASES WHERE BUILDING PARAPETS DO NOT ACCOMPLISH SUFFICIENT SCREENING, THEN FREE-STANDING SCREEN WALLS MATCHING THE PREDOMINANT COLOR OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED. OTHER MINOR EQUIPMENT SUCH AS CONDUIT, METERS AND PLUMBING VENTS SHALL BE SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH SURROUNDING BUILDING SURFACES. 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED IN ONE PHASE UNLESS A PHASING PLAN IS SHOWN WITH THESE PLANS. 6. [IF APPLICABLE -INCLUDE LANGUAGE FOR ANY MODIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS APPROVED WITH PDP/ODP. 7. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROVIDED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOOT-CANDLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 3.2.4 OF THE LAND USE CODE AND SHALL USE A CONCEALED, FULLY SHIELDED LIGHT SOURCE WITH SHARP CUT-OFF CAPABILITY SO AS TO MINIMIZE UP-LIGHT, SPILL LIGHT, GLARE AND UNNECESSARY DIFFUSION. 8. SIGNAGE AND ADDRESSING ARE NOT PERMITTED WITH THIS PLANNING DOCUMENT AND MUST BE APPROVED BY SEPARATE CITY PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SIGNS MUST COMPLY WITH CITY SIGN CODE UNLESS A SPECIFIC VARIANCE IS GRANTED BY THE CITY. 9. FIRE HYDRANTS MUST MEET OR EXCEED POUDRE FIRE AUTHORITY STANDARDS. ALL BUILDINGS MUST PROVIDE AN APPROVED FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM. 10. ALL BIKE RACKS PROVIDED MUST BE PERMANENTLY ANCHORED. 11. ALL SIDEWALKS AND RAMPS MUST CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS. ACCESSABLE RAMPS MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL STREET AND DRIVE INTERSECTIONS AND AT ALL DESIGNATED ACCESSABLE PARKING SPACES. ACCESSABLE PARKING SPACES MUST SLOPE NO MORE THAN 1:48 IN ANY DIRECTION. ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MUST SLOPE NO MORE THAN 1:20 IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND WITH NO MORE THAN 1:48 CROSS SLOPE. 12. COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN RIGHT OF WAYS, STREET MEDIANS, AND TRAFFIC CIRCLES ADJACENT TO COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE COMMON AREA. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SNOW REMOVAL ON ALL ADJACENT STREET SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALKS IN COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS. 13.DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF ALL PARKWAY/TREE LAWN AND MEDIAN AREAS IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS. UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE CITY WITH THE FINAL PLANS, ALL ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF SUCH AREAS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER/DEVELOPER. 14. THE PROPERTY OWNER FOR EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SNOW REMOVAL ON ALL STREET SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT. 15. ANY DAMAGED CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK EXISTING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AS WELL AS STREETS, SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, DESTROYED, DAMAGED OR REMOVED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, SHALL BE REPLACED OR RESTORED TO CITY OF FORT COLLINS STANDARDS AT THE DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE PRIOR TO THE ACCEPTANCE OF COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 16. FIRE LANE MARKING: A FIRE LANE MARKING PLAN MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE OFFICIAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. WHERE REQUIRED BY THE FIRE CODE OFFICIAL, APPROVED SIGNS OR OTHER APPROVED NOTICES THAT INCLUDE THE WORDS NO PARKING FIRE LANE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS TO IDENTIFY SUCH ROADS OR PROHIBIT THE OBSTRUCTION THEREOF. THE MEANS BY WHICH FIRE LANES ARE DESIGNATED SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CLEAN AND LEGIBLE CONDITION AT ALL TIMES AD BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED WHEN NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE VISIBILITY. 17. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION: AN ADDRESSING PLAN IS REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY AND POUDRE FIRE AUTHORITY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. UNLESS THE PRIVATE DRIVE IS NAMED, MONUMENT SIGNAGE MAY BE REQUIRED TO ALLOW WAY_FINDING. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL HAVE ADDRESS NUMBERS, BUILDING NUMBERS OR APPROVED BUILDING IDENTIFICATION PLACED IN A POSITION THAT IS PLAINLY LEGIBLE, VISIBLE FROM THE STREET OR ROAD FRONTING THE PROPERTY, AND POSTED WITH A MINIMUM OF SIX_INCH NUMERALS ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND. WHERE ACCESS IS BY MEANS OF A PRIVATE ROAD AND THE BUILDING CANNOT BE VIEWED FROM THE PUBLIC WAY, A MONUMENT, POLE OR OTHER SIGN OR MEANS SHALL BE USED TO IDENTIFY THE STRUCTURE. AA of SHEET INFORMATION NFORMATION PROJECT INFORMATION ORMATION PROJECT PHASE HASE SEAL ARCHITECT HITECT ISSUE DATE: PROJECT #: CONSULTANT SULTANT T - 970.484.0117 F - 970.484.0264 315 East Mountain Ave Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80524-2913 • ••••••••• •••••••••www.••• www.rbbarchitects.com ARCHITECTS REVISIONS: Plot Date: 11/21/2019 6:48 PM Plotted By: Jeff Kroeger Date Created: 10/5/2019 L100.0 RBB - 1801 POUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT SPAR SUBMITTAL ROUND 2 11/22/2019 EAST PROSPECT ROAD & SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 5 FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 PSD MS/HS PROTOTYPE SCHOOL AT PROSPECT DESCRIPTION DATE 1603 Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 (970) 223-7577 Landscape Architecture Urban Design Graphic Design BHA - 1803 SITE PLAN - OVERALL ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 26 CTV CTV CTV CTV SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU B M S S S S S S S H2O H2O H2O H2O H2O H2O H2O WV WV W S S C C C M CABLE C M W W CC E C M M CABLE MM C W M CABLE CABLE CABLE CABLE CABLE VAULT CABLE CABLE M CABLE C WV C C GAS C C WV WV C C WV B M X X X SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS S B M WV W S O W MH F.O. S C.O. S S VAULT F.O. VAULT VAULT CABLE F.O. C CABLE CABLE CABLE TELE W M GAS VAULT CABLE F.O. F.O. F.O. F.O. F.O. F.O. VAULT CABLE F.O. F.O. S S SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD S S FO FO FO FO FO FO E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E FO FO T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO CTV CTV CTV CT T T T T T T G G G G MH W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W / OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE W W W W OHE OHE H2O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W M H / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / X X X X X X X X X X X OHU OHU OHU W V W W W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 8" SS 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W F 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 6" W 6" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W 8" W S F S S S W F S F S F W W F F W W S S / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X / / / / / 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 12" W 518' 228' 107'-6", R.O.W. 140' R.O.W. 54' 42' 56' 56' 11'-7" 13' BLDG. A.3 BLDG. A.5 1518' BLDG. A.4 2' 1112' 404' 559' 290' 90' BLDG. B.4 ATHLETICS PARKING: 27 (8 H.C.) ATHLETICS PARKING: 8 (1 H.C.) 76'-7" 879'-7" 78'-6" 252'-1" 122'-8" STUDENT PARKING: 125 STUDENT PARKING: 144 (12 H.C.) STUDENT PARKING: 244 (12 H.C.) STUDENT PARKING: 177 (8 H.C.) (FUTURE) ATHLETICS PARKING: 236 STAFF PARKING: 121 (8 H.C.) (FUTURE) STAFF PARKING:28 ATHLETICS PARKING: 78 (2 H.C.) (FUTURE) STUDENT PARKING: 53 (FUTURE) STUDENT PARKING: 66 BLDG. A.1. BLDG. B.1 BLDG. B.2. BLDG. B.3 BLDG. A.2 (LARAMER COUNTY) ZONING: FA1- FARMING LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL (TIMNATH) ZONING: CC- COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LAND USE: AGRICULTURE (TIMNATH) ZONING: R2- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL (LARAMER COUNTY) ZONING: FA1- FARMING LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL (LARAMER COUNTY) ZONING: E1- ESTATE LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL (FORT COLLINS) ZONING: I- INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT LAND USE: PUD (FORT COLLINS) ZONING: I- INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT LAND USE: PUD CACHE LA POUDRE RESERVOIR INLET OWNER: COCHRAN PARCEL ID: 8715006003 OWNER: PETTINE PARCEL ID: 8715006004 OWNER: LAINE PARCEL ID: 8715006005 OWNER: BENDER PARCEL ID: 8715006006 OWNER: CAPE PARCEL ID: 8715006007 OWNER: KUHN PARCEL ID: 8715006008 OWNER: SCHMIDTKE PARCEL ID: 8715006009 OWNER: WHITE PARCEL ID: 8715000009 OWNER: WHITE PARCEL ID: 8715000021 OWNER: TROXELL PARCEL ID: 8722200011 OWNER: ALVAREZ PARCEL ID: 8722200010 OWNER: GRAY PARCEL ID: 8722200018 OWNER: JIRON PARCEL ID: 8722200019 OWNER: SIGNORELLI PARCEL ID: 8722200021 OWNER: EKBLAD PARCEL ID: 8722107701 OWNER: EKBLAD PARCEL ID: 8722107702 OWNER: NICHOLS PARCEL ID: 8722105032 MCLAUGHLIN LN. MEADOWAIRE DR. OWNER: SPLITTGERBER PARCEL ID: 8722105031 OWNER: RYAN PARCEL ID: 8722105020 OWNER: KNIEVEL PARCEL ID: 8722105019 OWNER: LACY PARCEL ID: 8722105001 CARRIAGE RD. OWNER: HEBBELN PARCEL ID: 8723008016 OWNER: KITCHEL LAKE PARTNERS LLC. PARCEL ID: 8714340003 OWNER: KITCHEL LAKE DEVELOPMENT CORP. PARCEL ID: 8714340002 LOT 'D' OWNER: WHITE PARCEL ID: 8715000009 (SEE LETTER OF INTENT INCLUDED W/ SUBMITTAL FOR PURCHASE AGREEMENT W/ PSD) FUTURE ACCESS ROAD TO CARRIAGE PARKWAY STADIUM (LIGHTED) COMPETITION FIELD (LIGHTED) TENNIS COURTS PRACTICE FIELD PRACTICE FIELD BASEBALL FIELD (FUTURE LIGHTS) SOFTBALL FIELD (FUTURE LIGHTS) FLEX BALLFIELD STUDENT PARKING: 28 FUTURE CLASSROOM EXPANSION FUTURE CLASSROOM EXPANSION BLDG. A.7 BLDG. A.6 BLDG. A.9 BLDG. A.8 TYP. STANDARD PARKING STALL TYP. ADA PARKING STALL 9' 8' 5' 8' 19' ADA AISLE MAIN STREET / COUNTY ROAD NO.5. (2-LANE ARTERIAL, RURAL) FUTURE CARRIAGE PARKWAY (MINOR COLLECTOR) NORTH 0 75' 150' 300' S C A L E : 1" = 1 5 0' A of SHEET INFORMATION PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT PHASE SEAL ARCHITECT ISSUE DATE: PROJECT #: CONSULTANT T - 970.484.0117 F - 970.484.0264 315 East Mountain Ave Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80524-2913 © 2019 www.rbbarchitects.com ARCHITECTS REVISIONS: Plot Date:10/8/2019 6:53 PM Plotted By: Jeff Kroeger Date Created:10/5/2019 L100.0 1803 POUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT SPAR SUBMITTAL 10/09/2019 EAST PROSPECT ROAD & SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 5 FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 PSD MS/HS PROTOTYPE SCHOOL AT PROSPECT DESCRIPTION DATE 1603 Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 (970) 223-7577 Landscape Architecture Urban Design Graphic Design EAST PROSPECT ROAD (4-LANE ARTERIAL) PARKING DATA OVERALL VEHICLE PARKING ANALYSIS STUDENT PARKING PROPOSED FUTURE STANDARD PARKING STALLS 686 119 HANDICAP PARKING STALLS 32 - STAFF PARKING STANDARD PARKING STALLS 107 28 HANDICAP PARKING STALLS 8 - ATHLETICS PARKING STANDARD PARKING STALLS 95 236 HANDICAP PARKING STALLS 11 - TOTAL PARKING STALLS 939 383 ULTIMATE PARKING STALL BUILD OUT 1,322 OVERALL BICYCLE PARKING ANALYSIS BICYCLE RACKS 20 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES 220 TYPICAL PARKING STALL LAYOUT BUILDING DATA BUILDING: DESCRIPTION: USE: GROSS: STORIES: A.1 Middle - High School Occupancy: E & Accessory A & B 247,549 sq.ft. Partial 2-Story Level One: 158,090 sq.ft. Level Two: 89,459 sq.ft. A.2 Athletic Out Lot Building Occupancy: A-5 2,221 sq.ft. 1-Story A.3 Irrigation Well Pump House #1 Occupancy: U 76 sq.ft. 1-Story A.4 Irrigation Well Pump House #2 Occupancy: U 76 sq.ft. 1-Story A.5 Irrigation Filter / Control House Occupancy: U 258 sq.ft. 1-Story A.6 Varsity Ball Field Home Dugout Occupancy A-5 330 sq.ft. 1-Story A.7 Varsity Ball Field Visitor Dugout Occupancy A-5 330 sq.ft. 1-Story A.8 Varsity Softball Field Home Dugout Occupancy A-5 330 sq.ft. 1-Story A.9 Varsity Softball Field Visitor Dugout Occupancy A-5 330 sq.ft. 1-Story B.1 District Stadium Team Building Occupancy A-5 12,193 sq.ft. 1-Story B.2 District Stadium Home Team Entry Occupancy A-5 4,693 sq.ft. 1-Story B.3 District Stadium Home Team Entry Occupancy A-5 4,324 sq.ft. 1-Story B.4 District Stadium Press Box Occupancy A-5 2,157 sq.ft. 2-Story Level One: 522 sq.ft. Level Two: 1,635 sq.ft. SITE PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO FINAL UTILITY PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION FOR STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITY MAINS AND SERVICES, PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHY, STREET IMPROVEMENTS. 2. REFER TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT AND UTILITY PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EASEMENTS, LOTS, TRACTS, STREETS, WALKS AND OTHER SURVEY INFORMATION. 3. THE PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINAL PLANS. AMENDMENTS TO THE PLANS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS. 4. ALL ROOFTOP AND GROUND MOUNTED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST BE SCREENED FROM VIEW FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS. IN CASES WHERE BUILDING PARAPETS DO NOT ACCOMPLISH SUFFICIENT SCREENING, THEN FREE-STANDING SCREEN WALLS MATCHING THE PREDOMINANT COLOR OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED. OTHER MINOR EQUIPMENT SUCH AS CONDUIT, METERS AND PLUMBING VENTS SHALL BE SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH SURROUNDING BUILDING SURFACES. 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED IN ONE PHASE UNLESS A PHASING PLAN IS SHOWN WITH THESE PLANS. 6. [IF APPLICABLE -INCLUDE LANGUAGE FOR ANY MODIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS APPROVED WITH PDP/ODP. 7. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING PROVIDED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOOT-CANDLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 3.2.4 OF THE LAND USE CODE AND SHALL USE A CONCEALED, FULLY SHIELDED LIGHT SOURCE WITH SHARP CUT-OFF CAPABILITY SO AS TO MINIMIZE UP-LIGHT, SPILL LIGHT, GLARE AND UNNECESSARY DIFFUSION. 8. SIGNAGE AND ADDRESSING ARE NOT PERMITTED WITH THIS PLANNING DOCUMENT AND MUST BE APPROVED BY SEPARATE CITY PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SIGNS MUST COMPLY WITH CITY SIGN CODE UNLESS A SPECIFIC VARIANCE IS GRANTED BY THE CITY. 9. FIRE HYDRANTS MUST MEET OR EXCEED POUDRE FIRE AUTHORITY STANDARDS. ALL BUILDINGS MUST PROVIDE AN APPROVED FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM. 10. ALL BIKE RACKS PROVIDED MUST BE PERMANENTLY ANCHORED. 11. ALL SIDEWALKS AND RAMPS MUST CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS. ACCESSABLE RAMPS MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL STREET AND DRIVE INTERSECTIONS AND AT ALL DESIGNATED ACCESSABLE PARKING SPACES. ACCESSABLE PARKING SPACES MUST SLOPE NO MORE THAN 1:48 IN ANY DIRECTION. ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MUST SLOPE NO MORE THAN 1:20 IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND WITH NO MORE THAN 1:48 CROSS SLOPE. 12. COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN RIGHT OF WAYS, STREET MEDIANS, AND TRAFFIC CIRCLES ADJACENT TO COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE COMMON AREA. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SNOW REMOVAL ON ALL ADJACENT STREET SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALKS IN COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS. 13. DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF ALL PARKWAY/TREE LAWN AND MEDIAN AREAS IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS. UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE CITY WITH THE FINAL PLANS, ALL ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF SUCH AREAS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER/DEVELOPER. 14. THE PROPERTY OWNER FOR EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SNOW REMOVAL ON ALL STREET SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT. 15. ANY DAMAGED CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK EXISTING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AS WELL AS STREETS, SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, DESTROYED, DAMAGED OR REMOVED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, SHALL BE REPLACED OR RESTORED TO CITY OF FORT COLLINS STANDARDS AT THE DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE PRIOR TO THE ACCEPTANCE OF COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 16. FIRE LANE MARKING: A FIRE LANE MARKING PLAN MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE OFFICIAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. WHERE REQUIRED BY THE FIRE CODE OFFICIAL, APPROVED SIGNS OR OTHER APPROVED NOTICES THAT INCLUDE THE WORDS NO PARKING FIRE LANE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS TO IDENTIFY SUCH ROADS OR PROHIBIT THE OBSTRUCTION THEREOF. THE MEANS BY WHICH FIRE LANES ARE DESIGNATED SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CLEAN AND LEGIBLE CONDITION AT ALL TIMES AD BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED WHEN NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE VISIBILITY. 17. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION: AN ADDRESSING PLAN IS REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY AND POUDRE FIRE AUTHORITY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. UNLESS THE PRIVATE DRIVE IS NAMED, MONUMENT SIGNAGE MAY BE REQUIRED TO ALLOW WAY_FINDING. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL HAVE ADDRESS NUMBERS, BUILDING NUMBERS OR APPROVED BUILDING IDENTIFICATION PLACED IN A POSITION THAT IS PLAINLY LEGIBLE, VISIBLE FROM THE STREET OR ROAD FRONTING THE PROPERTY, AND POSTED WITH A MINIMUM OF SIX_INCH NUMERALS ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND. WHERE ACCESS IS BY MEANS OF A PRIVATE ROAD AND THE BUILDING CANNOT BE VIEWED FROM THE PUBLIC WAY, A MONUMENT, POLE OR OTHER SIGN OR MEANS SHALL BE USED TO IDENTIFY THE STRUCTURE. A of SHEET INFORMATION PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT PHASE SEAL ARCHITECT ISSUE DATE: PROJECT #: CONSULTANT T - 970.484.0117 F - 970.484.0264 315 East Mountain Ave Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80524-2913 © 2019 www.rbbarchitects.com ARCHITECTS REVISIONS: Plot Date:10/8/2019 6:53 PM Plotted By: Jeff Kroeger Date Created:10/5/2019 L100.0 1803 POUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT SPAR SUBMITTAL 10/09/2019 EAST PROSPECT ROAD & SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 5 FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 PSD MS/HS PROTOTYPE SCHOOL AT PROSPECT DESCRIPTION DATE 1603 Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 (970) 223-7577 Landscape Architecture Urban Design Graphic Design SITE PLAN - OVERALL ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 25 Dd,WZ Ͳ&/E/^, KW/E' 'ZzK>KZϰyϭϲ DW ZKZ Z/< 'ZzK>KZϰyϴ ^K>/ ZKhZ^ Z/< Z<ZKE K>KZ>hD/EhD ^dKZ &ZKEd^z^d D Zh^dK>KZ D d>WE > Z<ZKE K>KZ>hD/EhD ^dKZ &ZKEd^z^d D Zh^dK>KZD d>WE > WZ Ͳ&/E/^, D d> 'ZzK>KZϰyϭϲ 'Zd & E E'd ^ DW ZKZZ/< Z<ZKE K>KZ WZ Ͳ&/E/^, D d> KW/E' ϴϱΖͲϰΗ ϳϲΖͲϬΗ ϭϬϮΖͲϬΗ ϭϴΖͲϬΗ ϭϱϱΖͲϰΗ ϵϬΖͲϴΗ ϭϮΖͲϯΗ >d ZEd/E'KhZ^ Z/<Z s >͕dzW/> 'ZzK>KZ&/ Z'>^^ Z /E&KZ W>^d/ KKZ͕dzW/> ϱϯϵΖͲϳΗ > s >ϭ ϭϬϬΖͲϬΗ > s >Ϯ ϭϭϰΖͲϬΗ Z<ZKE K>KZ>hD/EhD ^dKZ &ZKEd^z^d D Zh^dK>KZD d>WE > Zh^dK>KZD d>WE >͕ Dd,WZ Ͳ&/E/^, KW/E' Z<ZKE K>KZWZ Ͳ&/E/^, D d>KW/E' 'ZzK>KZϰyϭϲ DW ZKZZ/< Z<ZKE K>KZ>hD/EhD ^dKZ &ZKEd^z^d D 'ZzK>KZϰyϭϴ ^K>/ ZKhZ^ Z/< Zh^dK>KZD d>WE >͕ Dd,WZ Ͳ&/E/^, KW/E' ^/>s ZK>KZD d>WE >^͕ Dd,WZ Ͳ&/E/^, KW/E' 'ZzK>KZϰyϭϲ DW ZKZZ/< Z<ZKE K>KZ>hD/EhD ^dKZ &ZKEd^z^d D ϭϬΖͲϴΗ ϭϭϰΖͲϴΗ ϲϳΖͲϰΗ ϭϯϬΖͲϴΗ ϴϬΖͲϬΗ ϱϮΖͲϰΗ ϰϴΖͲϰΗ ϯϭΖͲϴΗ ϮϱΖͲϬΗ ϯϰΖͲϴΗ dZE^>h Edt>> WE >^z^d D ϱϵϱΖͲϰΗ >d ZEd/E'KhZ^ Z/<Z s >͕dzW/> Z<ZKE K>KZ>hD/EhD ^dKZ &ZKEdt/EKt͕dzW/> > s >ϭ ϭϬϬΖͲϬΗ > s >Ϯ ϭϭϰΖͲϬΗ Z,/d dhZ>WZ Ͳ^dKEZ d 'ZzK>KZϰyϭϲ DW ZKZZ/< 'ZzK>KZϰyϴ ^K>/ ZKhZ^ Z/< Z<ZKE K>KZ>hD/EhD ^dKZ &ZKEd^z^d D Zh^dK>KZD d>WE > WZ Ͳ&/E/^, D d> &^/dEKWz 'ZzK>KZϰyϭϲ DW ZKZZ/< 'ZzK>KZϰyϭϲ DW ZKZZ/< dZE^>h Edt>> WE >^z^d D Zh^dK>KZD d>WE >͕ Dd,WZ Ͳ&/E/^, KW/E' Z<ZKE K>KZ>hD/EhD ^dKZ &ZKEd^z^d D 'ZKhE& Dh^/d t>> ϴϱΖͲϰΗ ϭϮϳΖͲϰΗ ϲϬΖͲϬΗ ϭϰϬΖͲϴΗ ϭϳϭΖͲϰΗ ϭϬΖͲϴΗ Z<ZKE K>KZ>hD/EhD ^dKZ &ZKEdt/EKt͕dzW/> 'ZzK>KZ&/ Z'>^^ Z /E&KZ W>^d/KKZ͕dzW/> >d ZEd/E'KhZ^ Z/<Z s >͕dzW/> ϱϵϱΖͲϰΗ D d>'d Z<ZKE K>KZWZ Ͳ &/E/^, D d>KW/E' ͲW>Kdd ^, d/E&KZDd/KE WZK: d/E&KZDd/KE WZK: dW,^ ^ > Z,/d d /^^h d ͗ WZK: dη͗ KE^h>dEd dͲ ϵϳϬ͘ϰϴϰ͘Ϭϭϭϳ &Ͳ ϵϳϬ͘ϰϴϰ͘ϬϮϲϰ ϯϭϱ ĂƐƚDŽƵŶƚĂŝŶǀĞ ^ƵŝƚĞϭϬϬ &ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕KϴϬϱϮϰͲϮϵϭϯ ΞϮϬϭϵ ǁǁǁ͘ƌďďĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƐ͘ĐŽŵ Z,/d d^ Z s/^/KE^͗ ϭϬͬϴͬϮϬϭϵϯ͗ϰϳ͗ϮϬWD ϬϬϭ ϭϴϬϮ Ks Z>>^,KK> > sd/KE^ W^D^ͬ,^WZKdKdzW ^WKhZ ^,KK>,KK>dWZK^/^dZ/d W d 63$568%0,77$/ ϭϬͬϬϵͬϮϬϭϵ ^dWZK^W dZΘ^Khd,KhEdzZ͘ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ϭ D^ ͬ, ^^,KK>Ͳ ^d ϭ D^ ͬ, ^^,KK>Ͳ t ^d ϭ D^ ͬ, ^^,KK>Ͳ ^Khd, ϭ D^ ͬ, ^^,KK>Ͳ EKZd, ^Z/Wd/KE d ROUND 2 11/22/2019 ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 19 10'-0" 10'-0" W12 Column (by others) Disconnect (recommended) +/- 39'-11" 9DULHV ITEM 4, Applicant's Additional Information Supplemental Packet Pg. 17