The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/19/2020 - Landmark Preservation Commission - Agenda - Regular MeetingMeg Dunn, Chair City Council Chambers Alexandra Wallace, Co-Vice Chair City Hall West Michael Bello 300 Laporte Avenue Mollie Bredehoft Fort Collins, Colorado Kurt Knierim Elizabeth Michell Kevin Murray Anne Nelsen Anna Simpkins Fort Collins is a Certified Local Government (CLG) authorized by the National Park Service and History Colorado based on its compliance with federal and state historic preservation standards. CLG standing requires Fort Collins to maintain a Landmark Preservation Commission composed of members of which a minimum of 40% meet federal standards for professional experience from preservation-related disciplines, including, but not limited to, historic architecture, architectural history, archaeology, and urban planning. For more information, see Article III, Division 19 of the Fort Collins Municipal Code. The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. Video of the meeting will be broadcast at 1:30 p.m. the following day through the Comcast cable system on Channel 14 or 881 (HD). Please visit http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/ for the daily cable schedule. The video will also be available for later viewing on demand here: http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php. Regular Meeting February 19, 2020 5:30 PM • CALL TO ORDER • ROLL CALL • AGENDA REVIEW o Staff Review of Agenda o Consent Agenda Review This Review provides an opportunity for the Commission and citizens to pull items from the Consent Agenda. Anyone may request an item on this calendar be “pulled” off the Consent Agenda and considered separately.  Commission-pulled Consent Agenda items will be considered before Discussion Items.  Citizen-pulled Consent Agenda items will be considered after Discussion Items. Landmark Preservation Commission AGENDA Packet Pg. 1 Updated 2-24-20 - See Document Log following summary agenda for details. • STAFF REPORTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA • PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA • CONSENT AGENDA 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 2020. The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the January 15, 2020 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. 2. REPORT ON STAFF DESIGN REVIEW DECISIONS FOR DESIGNATED PROPERTIES Staff is tasked with reviewing projects and, in cases where the project can be approved without submitting to the Landmarks Preservation Commission, with issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness or a SHPO report under Chapter 14, Article IV of the City’s Municipal Code. This item is a report of all such review decisions since the last regular meeting of the Commission. • CONSENT CALENDAR FOLLOW UP This is an opportunity for Commission members to comment on items adopted or approved on the Consent Calendar. • PULLED FROM CONSENT Any agenda items pulled from the Consent Calendar by a Commission member, or member of the public, will be discussed at this time. • DISCUSSION AGENDA 3. THE LOIS STRUBLE PROPERTY AT 129 NORTH MCKINLEY AVENUE - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council for landmark designation of the Lois Struble Property at 129 N. McKinley Avenue. APPLICANT: Kim Baker Medina and Ramon Medina Aguilera 4. 720 W PROSPECT (EMMA BROWN/SUSAN WINTER HOUSE) – DESIGN REVIEW DESCRIPTION: Exterior rehabilitation work (window rehab, in-kind stucco repair and paint, rehab wood barge rafters and rafter tails, replacement asphalt roof, new half- round gutters and downspouts) on the landmarked residence. Construction of a new three-story apartment building behind the historic residences. APPLICANT: Ian Schuff, alm2s; CSU Research Foundation (CSURF)/Maximo Development The Consent Agenda is intended to allow the Commission to spend its time and energy on the important items on a lengthy agenda. Staff recommends approval of the Consent Agenda. Anyone may request an item on this calendar to be "pulled" off the Consent Agenda and considered separately. Agenda items pulled from the Consent Agenda will be considered separately under Pulled Consent Items. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda will be approved by Commission with one vote. The Consent Agenda consists of: ● Approval of Minutes ● Items of no perceived controversy ● Routine administrative actions Packet Pg. 2 5. HAVEN APARTMENTS (PDP190017) – DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitation work on the windows, stucco, chimney, wood fascia; a replacement asphalt roof; and the construction of a new three-story apartment building behind the designated landmark at 720 W Prospect and the abutting residence at 730 W Prospect. APPLICANT: Ian Schuff, alm2s; CSU Research Foundation (CSURF) • OTHER BUSINESS o Discussion with Erica Duvic, History Colorado CLG Coordinator o Election of 2020 Officers (Chair and Vice Chair) • ADJOURNMENT Packet Pg. 3 Landmark Preservation Commission Hearing Date: 2/19/20 Document Log (Any written comments or documents received since the agenda packet was published.) CONSENT AGENDA: 1. Draft Minutes for the LPC January Hearing – minor edits on 2/13/20 2. Staff Design Review Decisions Report DISCUSSION AGENDA: 3. 129 N McKinley Landmark Designation • None 4. 720 W. Prospect Design Review • Att 1 – Staff Presentation – updated in packed 2-19-20 5. Haven Apts Development Review • Staff Report – updated in packed 2-19-20 • Att 1 – Staff Presentation – updated in packed 2-19-20 EXHIBITS RECEIVED DURING HEARING: Item # Exhibit # Description: 4 A Applicant Presentation 5 A Applicant Presentation 5 B Applicant Submittal for Bldg. 2 5 C Applicant Submittal for Bldg. 3 5 D Materials Photos Date: Roll Call Bello Bredehoft Knierim Michell Murray Nelsen Simpkins Wallace Dunn Vote absent   absent      7 present Consent 1 & 2 - Minutes and Staff Design Review Report Nelsen Simpkins Bredehoft Michell Murray Bello Knierim Wallace Dunn Yes Yes Yes absent Yes absent Yes Yes Yes 7:0 3 - 129 N McKinley Landmark Designation Simpkins Bredehoft Michell Murray Bello Knierim Dunn Nelsen Wallace Yes Yes absent Yes absent Yes recused Yes Yes 6:0 4 - 720 W Prospect Design Review - approval Bredehoft Michell Murray Bello Knierim Wallace Nelsen Simpkins Dunn Yes absent Yes absent Yes absent Yes Yes Yes 6:0 5 - Apex/Haven Apartments Development Review Recommend to Decision Maker Michell Murray Bello Knierim Wallace Nelsen Simpkins Bredehoft Dunn absent Yes absent Yes absent Yes Yes Yes Yes 6:0 Election - Meg Dunn for Chair Murray Bello Knierim Wallace Nelsen Simpkins Bredehoft Michell Dunn Yes absent Yes absent Yes Yes Yes absent Yes 6:0 Election - Alex Wallace and Mollie Bredehoft for Co- Vice Chairs Bello Knierim Wallace Nelsen Simpkins Bredehoft Michell Murray Dunn absent Yes absent Yes Yes Yes absent Yes Yes 6:0 Roll Call & Voting Record Landmark Preservation Commission 2/19/2020 Agenda Item 1 Item 1, Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY February 19, 2020 Landmark Preservation Commission STAFF Gretchen Schiager, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 2020 REGULAR MEETING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the January 15, 2020 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS 1. LPC January 15, 2020 Minutes - DRAFT Packet Pg. 4 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 1 January 15, 2020 Meg Dunn, Chair City Council Chambers Alexandra Wallace, Co-Vice Chair City Hall West Michael Bello 300 Laporte Avenue Mollie Bredehoft Fort Collins, Colorado Elizabeth Michell Kevin Murray Anne Nelsen Anna Simpkins Vacant Regular Meeting January 15, 2020 Minutes • CALL TO ORDER Chair Dunn called the meeting to order at 5:34 p.m. • ROLL CALL PRESENT: Bello, Bredehoft, Dunn, Michell, Murray, Nelsen, Simpkins, Wallace ABSENT: GUEST: Kurt Knierim (incoming LPC member) STAFF: Bzdek, Bertolini, Yatabe, Schiager New Commission member, Elizabeth Michell, introduced herself and stated she has a master’s degree in History with a specialization in Historic Preservation. • AGENDA REVIEW Mr. Bertolini stated there were no changes to the posted agenda. Chair Dunn stated she would like to discuss other business first since she would be recusing herself from the last item and will leave at that time. • STAFF REPORTS None. Landmark Preservation Commission ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 5 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 2 January 15, 2020 • OTHER BUSINESS – moved as requested by Chair Dunn Chair Dunn mentioned the Saving Places conference taking place later this month and expressed appreciation to Council and the City for the opportunity to go. Chair Dunn announced the upcoming Winter Mixer put on by Historic Larimer County and invited any interested members, staff, or members of the public to attend. • PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. • CONSENT AGENDA 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 18, 2020. The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the December 18, 2020 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. 2. STAFF DESIGN REVIEW DECISIONS ON DESIGNATED PROPERTIES Staff is tasked with reviewing projects and, in cases where the project can be approved without submitting to the Landmarks Preservation Commission, with issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness or a SHPO report under Chapter 14, Article IV of the City’s Municipal Code. This item is a report of all such review decisions since the last meeting of the Commission. Mr. Bello moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission approve the Consent Agenda of the January 15, 2020 regular meeting as presented. Ms. Nelsen seconded. The motion passed 8-0. • DISCUSSION AGENDA 3. HORSLEY/DELTA ZETA PROPERTY, 201 E. ELIZABETH ST. - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council for landmark designation of the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property. APPLICANT: 201 East Elizabeth Street, LLC, Owner, C/O Stephanie Walter Mr. Murry recused himself from this item due to discussions he has had with the owner regarding design assistance. Staff Report Ms. Jones presented the staff report providing historic context and explaining staff findings related to significance under standard one, events, and standard three, design and construction. She noted the property is within the Laurel School Historic District and discussed the Tudor Revival style of the house. Applicant Presentation None. Public Input None. Commission Questions and Discussion Chair Dunn pointed out an error in the application related to standards five, six, and seven. Ms. Jones stated that correction would be made. Ms. Wallace commented on the integrity of the property and its strong example of the Tudor Revival style. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 6 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 3 January 15, 2020 Chair Dunn agreed and noted several homes of this style were demolished. Commission Deliberation Mr. Bello moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend that City Council adopt an ordinance to designate the Horsley/Delta Zeta Property at 201 E. Elizabeth St., as a Fort Collins Landmark, finding that this property is eligible for its significance to Fort Collins under Standards 1, Events, and 3, Design/Construction, as supported by the analysis provided in the staff report dated January 15, 2020, and that the property clearly conveys this significance through all seven aspects of integrity; and finding also that the designation of this property will promote the policies and purposes of the City as specified in Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code. Ms. Nelsen seconded. The motion passed unanimously. 4. THE BROWN-GOODING HOUSE AT 425 MATHEWS STREET - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council for landmark designation of the Brown-Gooding House at 425 Mathews Street. APPLICANT: Sarah Breseke and Wouter Montfrooij Mr. Murry recused himself from this item due to having worked on the property. Staff Report Mr. Bertolini presented the staff report. He reviewed the history of the property and pointed out the many significant buildings built by Mr. Schroeder. He talked about the significance of the property and stated it retains all seven aspects of integrity. He noted a question was asked at the work session about what is under the plywood and, upon additional inspection, it was found to be a matching fixed 6-light window that was boarded up on the exterior. Applicant Presentation None. Public Input None. Commission Questions and Discussion Chair Dunn asked if there is an official place on the document that references the 1903 period of significance. Mr. Bertolini replied there is not currently a line for period of significance, though staff has considered adding it to the nomination form to assist with future design review and planning decisions. Chair Dunn asked whether the garage should be included within the period of significance. Mr. Bertolini replied a correction would be made to extend the period of significance at least to 1912. Commission Deliberation Mr. Bello moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend that City Council adopt an ordinance to designate the Brown-Gooding House at 425 Mathews, as a Fort Collins Landmark, finding that this property is eligible for its significance to Fort Collins under Standard 3, design/construction, as supported by the analysis provided in the staff report dated January 15, 2020, and that the property clearly conveys this significance through all seven aspects of integrity; and finding also that the designation of this property will promote the policies and purposes of the City as specified in Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code, and that the period of significance should be noted as 1903-1912. Ms. Nelsen seconded. Chair Dunn stated this is another great example of this style of architecture. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Murray returned to the meeting. Chair Dunn and Ms. Nelsen recused themselves from the next item due to conflicts of interest. Vice Chair Wallace chaired this item. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 7 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 4 January 15, 2020 5. 714 W. MOUNTAIN AVENUE – CARRIAGE HOUSE ALTERATION – DESIGN REVIEW DESCRIPTION: The property owner is seeking approval for an addition to house indoor parking to their existing historic carriage house. This request is based on a conceptual review placed before the LPC in December 2019, which included two options. The owner has selected an option (Option 1) which involves making an addition of one garage bay to the west elevation of the existing structure. The project also proposes replacement in-kind of the wood shingle cladding on the carriage house, and the installation of windows on the gable-end window openings on the upper floor. Staff has issued a Certificate of Appropriateness for the roof replacement. APPLICANT: Henry P. Thode, III Staff Report Mr. Bertolini presented the staff report. He reviewed the historic aspects of the home noting the carriage house is a secondary but contributing historic element. He reviewed the role of the Commission and detailed the proposed work, noting the Applicant would be seeking the Commission’s guidance on whether to rehabilitate or replace the garage door. He shared the architectural drawings for the garage addition and reviewed the staff findings of fact. He stated clarification is needed for the historic garage door treatment and noted specifications on replacement wood shingle cladding were provided earlier in the month. Commission Questions of Staff Acting Chair Wallace asked if staff has considered the wood shingle replacement to be in-kind. Mr. Bertolini replied in the affirmative and stated staff considered full replacement an appropriate treatment given the deterioration of the shingles on three elevations. Mr. Murray asked about standard 9. Mr. Bertolini replied it is staff’s opinion that the design of the new addition complies; however, that is ultimately a decision for the Commission. Applicant Presentation Jeff Gaines with High Craft Builders gave the Applicant presentation. He addressed questions from the work session and provided Commission members with an engineering report, an arborist evaluation and a plan of protection for their review. Mr. Gaines discussed the plan of protection and stated the general proposal for the garage interior involves cladding the wall with shingles, which adds to the reversibility of the structure. He discussed an engineer's review of the existing structure and stated the engineer's assessment is that there is no cause to believe the new addition would do harm to the existing foundation, but he discussed a plan to add a beam to carry the roof load if necessary. Mr. Gaines discussed the large tree on the site noting an assessment resulted in the recommendation to prune its roots and begin watering the tree in advance of construction. He went on to discuss the proposed garage door style stating it would not have windows and would be constructed of wood. He stated replacing the garage door would allow a car to be put in the garage from the driveway. Mr. Thode discussed the difficulties of the existing garage door noting it is too tight for his small truck. Public Input None. Commission Questions and Discussion Ms. Bredehoft asked if the opening size will be changed with the new garage door. Mr. Gaines replied just the door itself would change. Mr. Murray asked if there is enough room to install an overhead garage door. Mr. Gaines replied in the affirmative. Mr. Murray asked if there is plaster on the inside of the garage. Mr. Gaines replied in the negative and stated there is very little cracking on the concrete slab. Mr. Murray asked if the footer has been excavated for examination. Mr. Gaines replied in the negative. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 8 Landmark Preservation Commission Page 5 January 15, 2020 Mr. Murray asked if the structure is going to be heated. Mr. Gaines replied in the affirmative. Mr. Murray stated insulation around the outside of the foundation will likely be necessary to stop the frost line. [Secretary’s Note: Upon review of the draft minutes, Mr. Murray clarified that he intended to say “stop the heaving of the building due to frost”, rather than “stop the frostline”.] Ms. Simpkins asked when the current garage doors were installed. Mr. Thode replied they were there when his family moved in in 1955. Commission Discussion Vice Chair Wallace requested members discuss the areas of concern as identified by staff. Mr. Murray stated the supplementary roof framing makes sense to improve the integrity of the structure and make the building usable. He also stated replacing the shingles makes sense and stated he is not concerned with reinstalling the windows. He commended the hopper window repairs and stated removing the roof extension makes sense. He expressed some concern with the garage door replacement and questioned whether there would be a possibility of using design assistance to make the existing doors function. He also discussed the importance of being able to preserve the original structure should the addition be removed in the future. Ms. Michell asked about coming in from the north side. Mr. Thode replied it would take a fair amount of maneuvering. Mr. Gaines discussed the option of repairing the garage doors, which he stated would be possible; however, the issue is reliability and the opening being too tight to drive a car into. Mr. Murray suggested it would be possible to keep the doors with some type of system that would provide enough width. Mr. Bello asked if the new garage door on the back side of the garage could be the primary entrance. Mr. Gaines replied that would be the primary entrance if the other doors are not able to be changed; however, there is some concern regarding the maneuvering room on the back-alley side. Ms. Simpkins noted the garage doors do not appear to be 100 years old and do not match up with the period of significance. Acting Chair Wallace asked if it would strongly impact the Commission's decision to consider the doors a character defining feature if the doors are assumed to not be from the period of significance. Mr. Bello replied in the affirmative. Acting Chair Wallace questioned how old the doors would need to be for the Commission to consider them as part of the age of significance. She questioned whether the doors could be more accurately dated. Ms. Simpkins stated she does not believe the doors could be much older than 1955. Acting Chair Wallace stated she is torn given a period of significance has been established; therefore, the doors may have achieved significance as a character defining feature. Mr. Murray suggested this item may need to be tabled and again encouraged the applicant and owner to utilize the design assistance program. Mr. Gaines replied they would not like to table the item and stated they could go with the second option to attempt to rework the existing door if replacing the door is not a compromise that can be made to allow the use of the building. Acting Chair Wallace stated there is no need to table the item and asked members which option would best meet the Secretary of the Interior standards. Mr. Murray replied he would be supportive of replacing hardware to make the doors operational with an automatic opener. Ms. Bredehoft asked to discuss other elements of the project. Commission members discussed the other alterations and found no issues with the weight on the carriage house issue, shingle replacement, and window repair. Ms. Simpkins asked if there is a second story window on the west façade. Mr. Thode replied it is a bat house. Ms. Simpkins asked if two different doors are being proposed on the north side. Mr. Gaines replied in the affirmative and commented on the differentiation. Acting Chair Wallace stated staff expressed concerns with standards 2, 5, and 6. ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 9 DRAFT Landmark Preservation Commission Page 6 January 15, 2020 Ms. Bredehoft asked if the applicant has explored turning the doors into swinging rather than sliding doors, as that may have been the original mechanism. Mr. Gaines replied the doors are quite heavy. Ms. Simpkins noted that would not solve the size issue. Acting Chair Wallace asked if staff has any information on the date of the doors. Mr. Bertolini replied staff does not have any documentation, but it seems reasonable they would have been added later. Acting Chair Wallace requested the members discuss whether the doors are a character-defining feature. Mr. Bello replied they could be replaced with something similar. Mr. Murray replied he would prefer to see the existing doors made operable. Ms. Michell stated the door is very distinctive and was present when the property was landmarked; therefore, salvaging the doors may be important as they are historic in their own right. Ms. Simpkins stated she would not want to make a decision based on the size of the truck. Acting Chair Wallace stated the doors are character-defining and would like to see them retained with new hardware and tracks. Commission Deliberation Mr. Murray moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission issue a certificate of appropriateness for the work on the carriage house at 714 W. Mountain Avenue, finding that it satisfies the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Fort Collins Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article IV, using option E2 to retain the existing garage doors. Ms. Michell seconded. The motion passed 4-2, Bredehoft and Simpkins dissenting. • ADJOURNMENT Acting Chair Wallace adjourned the meeting at 7:14 p.m. Minutes prepared by Tripoint Data and respectfully submitted by Gretchen Schiager. Minutes approved by a vote of the Commission on __________________. _____________________________________ Meg Dunn, Chair ITEM 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 10 Agenda Item 2 Item 2, Page 1 STAFF REPORT February 19, 2020 Landmark Preservation Commission ITEM NAME STAFF DESIGN REVIEW DECISIONS ON DESIGNATED PROPERTIES, JANUARY 3, 2020 TO FEBRUARY 5, 2020 STAFF Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner INFORMATION Staff is tasked with reviewing projects and, in cases where the project can be approved without submitting to the Landmarks Preservation Commission, with issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness or a SHPO report under Chapter 14, Article IV of the City’s Municipal Code. Staff decisions are provided in this report and posted on the HPD’s “Design Review Notification” page. Notice of staff decisions are provided to the public and LPC for their information, but are not subject to appeal under Chapter 14, Article IV, except in cases where an applicant has requested a Certificate of Appropriateness for a project and that request has been denied. In that event, the applicant may appeal staff’s decision to the LPC pursuant to 14-55 of the Municipal Code, within two weeks of staff denial. The report below covers the period between January 3 and February 5, 2020. Property Address Description of Project Staff Decision Date of Decision 200 Linden St. Replacement signage for new tenant. Non- contributing property in Old Town Historic District (City Landmark District) Approved January 3, 2020 117 N. Sherwood St. In-kind roof replacement (wood shingle) for Root Cellar & Barn (dwelling). Covenant on property requiring design review similar to City Landmark. Approved. January 10, 2020 930 W. Mountain Avenue In-kind roof replacement (asphalt shingle). City Landmark. Approved January 13, 2020 401 Linden St. Solar installation. Commercial permit review – property is new but adjacent to historic buildings. Solar installation not anticipated to have an adverse effect on neighboring historic buildings. Approved January 14, 2020 809 Whedbee St. In-kind roof replacement (asphalt shingle). Contributing property to Laurel School Historic District (NRHP) Report issued (approved) January 16, 2020 1022 S. College Avenue In-kind roof replacement (asphalt shingle). City Landmark. Approved January 21, 2020 Packet Pg. 11 Agenda Item 2 Item 2, Page 2 215 E. Mulberry St. In-kind roof replacement (asphalt shingle). Contributing property to Laurel School Historic District (NRHP) Report issued (approved) January 27, 2020 Packet Pg. 12 Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 1 STAFF REPORT February 19, 2020 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME THE LOIS STRUBLE PROPERTY AT 129 NORTH MCKINLEY AVENUE - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION STAFF Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION APPLICANT: Kim Baker Medina and Ramon Medina Aguilera PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council for landmark designation of the Lois Struble Property at 129 N. McKinley Avenue. COMMISSION’S ROLE AND ACTION: One of the Commission’s responsibilities is to provide a recommendation to City Council on applications for the designation of a property as a Fort Collins Landmark. Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code provides the standards and process for designation. At the hearing, the Commission shall determine whether the following two (2) criteria are satisfied: (1) the proposed resource is eligible for designation; and (2) the requested designation will advance the policies and the purposes in a manner and extent sufficient to justify the requested designation. Following its review, and once the Commission feels it has the information it needs, the Commission should adopt a motion providing its recommendation on the property’s Landmark eligibility to City Council. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has determined that the Lois Struble Property is eligible for Fort Collins Landmark designation. The Lois Struble Property has significance under Standard 3 (Design/Construction), as a significant example of transitional post-World War II architecture in west Fort Collins, specifically as a unique example of a Minimal Traditional over-under duplex. The property retains all seven aspects of integrity. Staff recommends that the Landmark Preservation Commission approval a motion to Council recommending landmark designation. STAFF EVALUATION OF REVIEW CRITERIA STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE and EXTERIOR INTEGRITY Staff has determined that the Lois Struble Property is eligible under Standard 3. Standards of Significance: Significance is the importance of a site, structure, object or district to the history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture of our community, State or Nation. For designation as Fort Collins Landmarks or Fort Collins Landmark Districts properties must meet one (1) or more of the following standards: Packet Pg. 13 Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 2 Standard 1: Events The resource is associated with events that have made a recognizable contribution to the broad patterns of the history of the community, State or Nation. A resource can be associated with either or both of two (2) types of events: * A specific event marking an important moment in Fort Collins prehistory or history; and/or * A pattern of events or a historic trend that made a recognizable contribution to the development of the community, State or Nation. N/A Standard 2: Persons/ Groups The resource is associated with the lives of persons or groups of persons recognizable in the history of the community, State or Nation whose specific contributions to that history can be identified and documented. N/A Standard 3: Design/ Construction The resource embodies the identifiable characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; represents the work of a craftsman or architect whose work is distinguishable from others by its characteristic style and quality; possesses high artistic values or design concepts; or is part of a recognizable and distinguishable group of resources. The resource may be significant not only for the way it was originally constructed or crafted, but also for the way it was adapted at a later period, or for the way it illustrates changing tastes, attitudes, and/or uses over time. The Lois Struble Property at 129 N. McKinley Ave. is significant under Standard 3, Design/Construction, as an unusually unique example of a Minimal Traditional residence in Fort Collins. Constructed in 1948, this house is an over-under duplex located in the Swett Addition. A later example of a Minimal Traditional house, its design reflects the transitional period between the smaller Minimal Traditional homes constructed immediately before and after World War II and larger Ranch-type homes popular in the 1950s and 1960s. Minimal Traditional homes tend to be small, boxy, one-story buildings with minimal adornment and housing a single family. They also often had asbestos shingle or wood or Masonite siding, but later examples sometimes used striated brick, which can be seen on this home. Other Minimal Traditional features on this home include the front-facing gable section and closed eaves with a small overhang. Residences of this style also frequently incorporated modest Tudor Revival elements, such as this house’s prominent brick chimney. This home incorporates some architectural features of the Ranch Style popular in the 1950s and 1960s. Ranch homes often make the garage an integral part of the home, which is reflected in this house’s attached garage. Their use of masonry was also sometimes decorative rather than structural, as in the brick cladding over concrete block of this house. The architecturally transitional nature of the house at 129 N. McKinley Ave. makes it a noteworthy example of the Minimal Traditional building type in the city. YES Standard 4: Information potential The resource has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 3 Standards of Integrity Integrity is the ability of a site, structure, object or district to be able to convey its significance. The integrity of a resource is based on the degree to which it retains all or some of seven (7) aspects or qualities established by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. All seven qualities do not need to be present for a site, structure, object or district to be eligible as long as the overall sense of past time and place is evident. Standard 1: Location Location is the place where the resource was constructed or the place where the historic or prehistoric event occurred. The home has not been moved since its initial construction. YES Standard 2: Design Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan space, structure and style of a resource. This house retains excellent integrity of design. Its character-defining features, such as its prominent chimney, recessed front entry, attached garage, and small, wood sash windows with horizontal lights, and asymmetrical fenestration pattern all remain. The house has undergone very little alteration since its 1948 construction; the only building permits taken out for the property were for fences, re-roofing, a new furnace, and an air conditioning unit. The only other visible exterior alteration appears to the painting or skim-coating of the front stairs to resurface them and the change in the roof materials from wood to asphalt shingles, according to the 1948 Tax Assessor record. YES Standard 3: Setting Setting is the physical environment of a resource. Setting refers to the character of the place; it involves how, not just where, the resource is situated and its relationship to the surrounding features and open space. The setting of the Lois Struble Property has changed very little. Located in the Swett Addition to Fort Collins, this neighborhood contains small to medium- sized residences and was built out in two phases, first in the early twentieth century, then again in the postwar era. The Swett Addition remains residential and retains this mixed architectural character today. YES Packet Pg. 15 Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 4 Standard 4: Materials Materials are the physical elements that form a resource. This house also retains good integrity of materials. The primary cladding material, vertically scored red brick, is retained on both the house and attached garage. The front brick steps with concrete surfacing and metal railing are also original, based on historic photographs. The windows all appear to be historic wood windows, but storms have been replaced, and one pane of glass has been removed from a rear basement window to accommodate an air conditioning unit. The back door is historic, but the front door may not be. The most significant loss of materials was the change of the roof from wood to asphalt shingles. It is probable that this change occurred prior to or in 1976, based on a roofing permit that calls for fifteen pound felt; the International Association of Certified Home Inspectors claims that felt should be avoided as an underlayment or interlayment for wood shingled roofs due to moisture concerns. YES Standard 5: Workmanship Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. It is the evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering a building, structure or site. Workmanship is evident in several architectural features of this house. For instance, this house is constructed from concrete block with a brick veneer, which is building technique popular in the postwar era. Additionally, the brick cladding has an interesting surface texture; it is vertically scored, but the striation does not reach the ends of the bricks, creating additional visual interest across the house and garage. YES Standard 6: Feeling Feeling is a resource’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period or time. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the resource's historic or prehistoric character. Because this residence is surrounded by other houses constructed during the same period in the Swett’s Addition, it continues to feel like a postwar home. Although it is currently a single-family residence, the basement stairway entrance prominent on the façade of the house is a good visual indicator of this house’s original multifamily use in the postwar era. Furthermore, Minimal Traditional design is associated with the postwar era, and this house clearly embodies that building type. YES Packet Pg. 16 Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 5 Standard 7: Association Association is the direct link between an important event or person and a historic or prehistoric resource. A resource retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. This property is associated with Lois Struble (Anita Lois Struble), who lived in the house for more than fifty years, from 1957 until her death in 2018. However, Lois and her husband, Charles, did not purchase the house until 1976. Until they purchased the home, they lived in the upper portion of the over-under duplex and sometimes shared the property with people living in the basement. The basement apartment stairs at the front of the house are a reminder of Lois and Charles Struble’s early association with this property before they purchased the home. Additionally, an avid gardener, the well-tended iris gardens behind the house remain as a reminder of Lois’s life in this home. YES ALIGNMENT WITH CITY CODE AND PURPOSE The designation of historic properties and the work of historic preservation promote the policies and purposes adopted by City Council for the City of Fort Collins. Designation furthers the City’s goals of environmental, economic, and social sustainability. By continuing the use of an existing building and preserving the embodied energy of its existing materials, landmark designation is environmentally sustainable. The designation of historic properties also contributes to the City’s economic standing directly, through property, use, and sales taxes and revenues, and indirectly, through the promotion of heritage tourism. Furthermore, historic designation encourages the continuation of private property ownership. The City’s cultural standing is also upheld because the preservation of the built environment helps residents and visitors tangibly gain a better understanding of our history and the diversity of people who shaped Fort Collins. Landmark designation enhances and perpetuates significant resources in the City through the protection and acknowledgement of those historic properties as well as through the financial incentives offered to landmark owners. Finally, the designation of historic properties also maintains and enhances the City’s aesthetics through the protection and recognition of significant local architecture and history, contributing to the promotion of good urban design and fostering civic pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past. Taken together, these benefits of landmark designation help strengthen Fort Collins’s community and support our vision of a livable, sustainable city. (Municipal Code 14-1 and 14-2; City Plan) The designation of the Lois Struble Property at 129 N. McKinley Avenue would align with several aspects of the City’s Municipal Code and guiding policies. As a significant example of local architecture, protection of the property aligns with Municipal Code 14-2, specifically that the property is an important element of the City’s cultural, artistic, and architectural heritage and will help foster civic pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past. The property remains a private residence, aligning with 14-2(g) to “promote and encourage continued private ownership and utilization of such sites….” The recognition of the home and potential leveraging of preservation-based incentives in the future aligns with both the Municipal Code and City Plan Policy LIV 2.1 for the Revitalization of underutilized properties, specifically as an adaptive reuse. Designation is also consistent with Policies LIV 10.1, 10.2, 10.4, 10.6, to identify, preserve, utilize incentives for, and designate historic resources throughout the city, respectively. FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION FINDINGS OF FACT: In evaluating the request for a recommendation to City Council regarding landmark designation for the Brown- Gooding Property, staff makes the following findings of fact: 1. That all owners of the Lois Struble Property have consented in writing to this request for Fort Collins Landmark designation of the property; Packet Pg. 17 Agenda Item 3 Item 3, Page 6 2. That the Lois Struble Property has significance to Fort Collins under Significance Standard 3, Design/Construction, as supported by the analysis provided in this staff report; 3. That the Lois Struble Property has integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association to convey their significance as supported by the analysis provided in this staff report; 4. That the designation will advance the policies and purposes stated in the code in a manner and extent sufficient to justify the requested designation, as supported by the analysis provided in this staff report. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission adopt a motion to Council recommending the landmark designation of the Lois Struble Property. SAMPLE MOTIONS SAMPLE MOTION FOR APPROVAL: I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend that City Council adopt an ordinance to designate the Lois Struble Property at 129 N. McKinley Avenue, as a Fort Collins Landmark, finding that this property is eligible for its significance to Fort Collins under Standard 3, design/construction, as supported by the analysis provided in the staff report dated February 19, 2020, and that the property clearly conveys this significance through all seven aspects of integrity; and finding also that the designation of this property will promote the policies and purposes of the City as specified in Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code. SAMPLE MOTION FOR DENIAL: I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend that City Council does not adopt an ordinance to designate the Lois Struble Property at 129 N. McKinley Avenue, as a Fort Collins Landmark, finding that this property is not eligible because of a lack of significance or the failure of the property to convey its significance through its integrity, and/or finding that the designation of this property will not promote the policies and purposes of the City as specified in Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code. ATTACHMENTS 1. Landmark Designation Application 2. Staff Presentation 3. Draft LPC Resolution Packet Pg. 18 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Fort Collins Landmark Designation LOCATION INFORMATION Address: 129 N. McKinley Ave. Legal Description: Lot 6, Block 2, Swett’s Addition, Fort Collins Property Name (historic and/or common): The Lois Struble Property0F 1 OWNER INFORMATION Name: Kimberly Baker Medina; Ramon Medina Aguilera Company/Organization (if applicable): N/A Phone: 970-493-2878, 970-308-1184, 970-232-9455 Email: kimbakermedina@gmail.com Mailing Address: 128 N McKinley Ave, Fort Collins, CO 80521 CLASSIFICATION Category Ownership Status Present Use Existing Designation Building Public Occupied Commercial Nat’l Register Structure Private Unoccupied Educational State Register Site Religious Object Residential District Entertainment Government Other FORM PREPARED BY Name and Title: Reyana Jones, Historic Preservation Specialist; Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner Address: 281 N. College Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80524 Phone: (970) 416-4250 Email: preservation@fcgov.com 1 This property is named for Anita Lois Struble; she was known as Lois Struble. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 19 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 DATE: January 14, 2020 TYPE OF DESIGNATION and BOUNDARIES Individual Landmark Property Landmark District Explanation of Boundaries: The boundaries of the property being designated as a Fort Collins Landmark correspond to the legal description of the property, above. The property (hereinafter the “Property”) consists of the 1948 house and its surrounding landscape (parcel no. 9710409006). STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE and INTEGRITY Properties are eligible for designation if they possess both significance and integrity. Significance is the importance of a site, structure, object or district to the history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture of our community, State or Nation. For designation as Fort Collins Landmarks or Fort Collins Landmark Districts properties must meet one (1) or more of the following standards set forth in Fort Collins Municipal Code Section 14-22(a): Standard 1: Events This property is associated with events that have made a recognizable contribution to the broad patterns of the history of the community, State or Nation. It is associated with either (or both) of these two (2) types of events: a) A specific event marking an important moment in Fort Collins prehistory or history; and/or b) A pattern of events or a historic trend that made a recognizable contribution to the development of the community, State or Nation. Standard 2: Persons/Groups This property is associated with the lives of persons or groups of persons recognizable in the history of the community, State or Nation whose specific contributions to that history can be identified and documented. Standard 3: Design/Construction This property embodies the identifiable characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; represents the work of a craftsman or architect whose work is distinguishable from others by its characteristic style and quality; possesses high artistic values or design concepts; or is part of a recognizable and distinguishable group of properties. The Lois Struble Property at 129 N. McKinley Ave. is significant under Standard 3, Design/Construction, as an unusually unique example of a Minimal Traditional residence in Fort Collins. Constructed in 1948, this house is an over-under duplex located in the Swett Addition. A later example of a Minimal Traditional house, its design reflects the ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 20 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 transitional period between the smaller Minimal Traditional homes constructed immediately before and after World War II and larger Ranch-type homes popular in the 1950s and 1960s. Minimal Traditional homes tend to be small, boxy, one-story buildings with minimal adornment and housing a single family. They also often had asbestos- shingle or wood or Masonite siding, but later examples sometimes used striated brick, which can be seen on this home. Other Minimal Traditional features on this home include the front-facing gable section and closed eaves with a small overhang. Residences of this style also frequently incorporated modest Tudor Revival elements, such as this house’s prominent brick chimney. This home incorporates some architectural features of the Ranch Style popular in the 1950s and 1960s. Ranch homes often make the garage an integral part of the home, which is reflected in this house’s attached garage. Their use of masonry was also sometimes decorative rather than structural, as in the brick cladding over concrete block of this house. The architecturally transitional nature of the house at 129 N. McKinley Ave. makes it a noteworthy example of the Minimal Traditional building type in the city. Standard 4: Information Potential This property has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Period of Significance is the discrete chronological period during which a historic property gained its significance. Additions or alterations to a property that have significance in their own right can warrant the extension of a Period of Significance. Historic properties can have multiple Periods of Significance. Period(s) of Significance: Because of its significance under Standard 3, Design/Construction, the period of significance for the Lois Struble Property is 1948, the date of the house’s construction. Integrity is the ability of a site, structure, object or district to be able to convey its significance. The integrity of a resource is based on the degree to which it retains all or some of seven (7) aspects or qualities set forth in Fort Collins Municipal Code Section 14-22(b): location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. All seven qualities do not need to be present for a site, structure, object or district to be eligible as long as the overall sense of past time and place is evident. Standard 1: Location is the place where the resource was constructed or the place where the historic or prehistoric event occurred. The location of the Lois Struble Property has not changed. Standard 2: Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan space, structure and style of a resource. This house retains excellent integrity of design. Its character-defining features, such as its prominent chimney, recessed front entry, attached garage, and small, wood sash windows with horizontal lights, and asymmetrical fenestration pattern all remain. The ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 21 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 house has undergone very little alteration since its 1948 construction; the only building permits taken out for the property were for fences, re-roofing, a new furnace, and an air conditioning unit. The only other visible exterior alteration appears to the painting or skim-coating of the front stairs to resurface them and the change in the roof materials from wood to asphalt shingles, according to the 1948 Tax Assessor record.1F 2 Standard 3: Setting is the physical environment of a resource. Setting refers to the character of the place; it involves how, not just where, the resource is situated and its relationship to the surrounding features and open space. The setting of the Lois Struble Property has changed very little. Located in the Swett Addition to Fort Collins, this neighborhood contains small to medium-sized residences and was built out in two phases, first in the early twentieth century, then again in the postwar era. The Swett Addition remains residential and retains this mixed architectural character today. Standard 4: Materials are the physical elements that form a resource. This house also retains good integrity of materials. The primary cladding material, vertically scored red brick, is retained on both the house and attached garage. The front brick steps with concrete surfacing and metal railing are also original, based on historic photographs. The windows all appear to be historic wood windows, but storms have been replaced, and one pane of glass has been removed from a rear basement window to accommodate an air conditioning unit. The back door is historic, but the front door may not be. The most significant loss of materials was the change of the roof from wood to asphalt shingles. It is probable that this change occurred prior to or in 1976, based on a roofing permit that calls for fifteen pound felt;2F 3 the International Association of Certified Home Inspectors claims that felt should be avoided as an underlayment or interlayment for wood shingled roofs due to moisture concerns.3F 4 Standard 5: Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. It is the evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering a building, structure or site. Workmanship is evident in several architectural features of this house. For instance, this house is constructed from concrete block with a brick veneer, which is building technique popular in the postwar era. Additionally, the brick cladding has an interesting surface texture; it is vertically scored, but the striation does not reach the ends of the bricks, creating additional visual interest across the house and garage. Standard 6: Feeling is a resource’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular time. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the resource's historic or prehistoric character. 2 129 N. McKinley Ave. Tax Assessor Record, Tax Assessor Record Collection, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO. 3 Building Permit #25164, 129 N. McKinley Ave. for Charles L. Struble, April 14, 1976, Public Records Database, City of Fort Collins, CO, https://citydocs.fcgov.com/. 4 Kenton Shepard and Nick Gromicko, “Mastering Roof Inspections: Wood Shakes and Shingles, Part 3,” International Association of Certified Home Inspectors, https://www.nachi.org/wood-shakes-shingles-part3-135.htm. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 22 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Because this residence is surrounded by other houses constructed during the same period in the Swett’s Addition, it continues to feel like a postwar home. Although it is currently a single-family residence, the basement stairway entrance prominent on the façade of the house is a good visual indicator of this house’s original multifamily use in the postwar era. Furthermore, Minimal Traditional design is associated with the postwar era, and this house clearly embodies that building type. Standard 7: Association is the direct link between an important event or person and a historic or prehistoric resource. A resource retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. This property is associated with Lois Struble (Anita Lois Struble), who lived in the house for more than fifty years, from 1957 until her death in 2018. However, Lois and her husband, Charles, did not purchase the house until 1976. Until they purchased the home, they lived in the upper portion of the over-under duplex and sometimes shared the property with people living in the basement. The basement apartment stairs at the front of the house are a reminder of Lois and Charles Struble’s early association with this property before they purchased the home. Additionally, an avid gardener, the well- tended iris gardens behind the house remain as a reminder of Lois’s life in this home. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 23 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 HISTORICAL INFORMATION INTRODUCTION The Lois Struble Property at 129 N. McKinley Avenue is a noteworthy example of the Minimal Traditional house type in Fort Collins. Lois Struble lived at 129 N. McKinley Ave. for more than half of a century. Built after World War II, this Minimal Traditional house is architecturally transitional and represents the shifting wants and needs of homeowners in the postwar era. In this house, Lois and her husband, Charles, raised their children, became grandparents, and then became great-grandparents. In addition to her memories of her own family’s life, Lois Struble recalled the history of the rest of the residents and homes of the Swett Addition to Fort Collins and could recount stories of the different families in the neighborhood.4F 5 But long before Lois moved into the house at 129 N. McKinley Ave. and became the neighborhood historian, a group of men invested their resources and hopes into the land that would become Swett’s Addition. SWETT’S ADDITION 129 N. McKinley is part of the small Swett’s Addition, a neighborhood plat representative of the smaller developments in what is now the west side of “Old Town.” Like many agricultural communities in the western United States, the late-1890s through the 1920s were a period of a significant development. In Fort Collins, this involved a wave of housing construction west and southeast of downtown, including new subdivisions along streetcar lines built on Mountain Avenue, College Avenue, and Whedbee Street. The first subdivisions were earlier and larger, including West Side (1881), Loomis (1887), Craft’s (1890), and Capitol Hill (1908). Later in this development phase, developers platted smaller subdivisions of only a few blocks, mostly on the western extent of the Mountain Avenue streetcar line such as Morger-Smith (1905), Grandview (1906), Hensel’s (1908), Babbitt’s (1924), and Swett’s (1910). The Swett’s Addition and its neighbor to the west, the Vanslyke-Setzer addition (no official plat date), are significant in that they are a unique representation of the transition of housing in the neighborhoods west of Old Town from pre-World War II, dominated by Victorian-era and Arts-and-Crafts-era cottages, to post-World War II, dominated by Minimal Traditional cottages. While most of the subdivisions along the former trolley line reflect a single phase of construction (i.e., predominantly pre-World War II or post-World War II) with small numbers of homes from other periods, Swett’s and Vanslyke-Setzer are more balanced. Swett’s contains fourteen pre-war and nine post-war homes and Vanslyke-Setzer contains twelve pre-war homes, eleven post-war homes, and one modern (post-1970) home. Preliminary analysis suggests both neighborhoods have good historic integrity, although less information is readily available about the Vanslyke-Setzer Addition.5F 6 5 Kimberly Medina, Draft Fort Collins Landmark Nomination Application for 129 N. McKinley Ave., Digital Property Files Collection, City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Services, Community Development and Neighborhood Services Building, Fort Collins, CO. 6 Plat maps for West Side, Loomis, Craft’s, Capitol Hill, Morger-Smith, Hensel’s, Babbitt’s, Swett’s, and Vanslyke- Setzer additions, City of Fort Collins Public Records Database, https://citydocs.fcgov.com/, accessed February 5, 2020. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 24 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 The land that became the Swett’s addition was first claimed by the McAdam family. By 1869, Reverend W.T. McAdam, who served as a chaplain during the Civil War, retired as a Presbyterian minister, but his ambition certainly had not tired. On August 2, 1869, McAdam led a party of settlers on a journey from Mercer, Pennsylvania to the Cache la Poudre Valley. The company included Alfred A. Edwards, who would become Larimer County’s treasurer and president of the State Board of Agriculture, and Joseph E. Shipler, who would become Fort Collins’s first town clerk. Using a combination of rail and covered wagon transit, the party made their way to Colorado.6F 7 They arrived in Cheyenne, Wyoming on September 2, 1869 and then began their journey to Laporte, Colorado. On the way, they spent the night at the Whitcomb Ranch in Boxelder, hosted by Elias W. Whitcomb of Philadelphia and his Native American wife, Katherine Shaw, who were cattle ranchers. Arriving in Laporte the next day, they met Captain James W. Hanna and his brother-in-law, Addas Carter. Hanna and Carter were both from Mercer, Pennsylvania, like the arriving company. Hanna was in command of troops stationed at Camp Collins and, after the Civil War ended, corresponded with McAdam about the favorable conditions in the Cache la Poudre Valley; this exchange of information prompted the emigration of McAdam’s party.7F 8 McAdam and the other new arrivals all filed claims for land around what is now City Park, including what would become Swett’s Addition to the City of Fort Collins. The settlers built residences to prove up their claims, and their families quickly ventured out from Pennsylvania to join them by the spring of 1870. This area became the Mercer Colony, the first agricultural colony in the Cache la Poudre Valley. By forming a colony, a group of people could diffuse the risk involved in uprooting their lives and moving across the country by settling in the same area with a group of people familiar with each other, who all had similar goals, and who all had a significant interest in the success of the rest of the colony, be it financial or personal.8F 9 In addition to their land claims, the colonists also formed the Mercer Pole and Ditch Company and began to dig the Mercer Ditch north of Laporte; however, the colony ran out of funds and dissolved before finishing this project, which was completed in 1872 by the New Mercer Ditch Company.9F 10 Despite the dissolution of the Mercer Colony, W.T. McAdam held onto his quarter-section homestead west of town, which included the land that would become the Swett Addition, until 1879, when he sold his land to Charles H. Sheldon.10F 11 Sheldon was a well-known banker in Fort Collins. He managed the Yount Bank, the first brick bank in town, for Mr. and Mrs. A.K. Yount in the mid-1870s. Then, in 1878, Sheldon and William C. Stover formed the Stover and Sheldon Bank in the Wilson Block on Jefferson, which was modestly furnished with “two common chairs, a pine 7 Alfred A. Edwards, “News Flashbacks: Alfred A. Edwards Tells of Valley as It Was When He Came in 1869,” Fort Collins Express, September 29, 1935, https://history.fcgov.com/newsflashback/edwards; “Early Agricultural Colonies and Cooperative Irrigating,” Public Lands History Center, Colorado State University, https://publiclands.colostate.edu/digital_projects/dp/poudre-river/crops-livestock/agricultural-colonies/.) 8 Ibid. 9 The Union Colony at Greeley, Colorado: 1869-1871, Volume 1, Edited by James Filed Willard (Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, 1918), xiv. 10 Edwards. 11 Warranty Deed, W.T. McAdam et al. to Charles H. Sheldon, August 7, 1879, Book T, Page 142, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 25 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 table, and a borrowed safe.”11F 12 Later in 1878, Sheldon and Stover founded the Poudre Valley Bank. The following year, they opened a new bank building next to the Parlor Drug Store with furnishings reflective of their success as bankers, including a “Mosler and Bauman safe with a Yale time lock.”12F 13 This institution became the Poudre Valley National Bank in 1905. Sheldon also held multiple public offices. He was elected to Fort Collins’s first City Council as Treasurer in 1883, and he served as Treasurer for the State Board of Agriculture from the early 1890s into the early twentieth century.13F 14 Although Charles Sheldon owned the land where this house and the rest of the Swett Addition residences now stand, as well as many other acres of the surrounding land, it was his father, John Sheldon, who actually worked the land and lived there with his other son, Henry. Charles Sheldon quit claimed the land to his father in 1884.14F 15 John Sheldon’s farm and sheep ranch included over two thousand acres and was widely admired among his contemporaries.15F 16 He is credited with raising the first crop of alfalfa grown in the Cache la Poudre Valley in 1876 on the Scott & Sherwood farm, a crop many believed to have contributed greatly to the prosperity of the region due to its drought tolerance and profitability as livestock feed.16F 17 John Sheldon also reportedly stocked the lake on his farm, now Sheldon Lake (named for him) in City Park, with German carp in 1883. He passed away soon after, but in 1887, William Lindenmeier, his son, and Abner Loomis caught twenty-seven carp from that lake and used them in part, to stock Lindenmeier Lake, where they “gr[e]w rapidly” and were considered “an excellent food fish.”17F 18 It is no coincidence that Abner Loomis was among the party fishing on Sheldon Lake in 1887; he and Malinda Maxwell (who he would marry in 1896), purchased the property from the estate of Henry Sheldon through a conservator’s deed in August of 1887.18F 19 An early settler in the Cache la Poudre Valley, Loomis ran a successful cattle ranch for many years, but he sold his holdings and shifted his focus to business in Fort Collins in 1882. For example, he had the Loomis Block at Walnut and Linden Streets built that same year. In addition to purchasing the land that would become the Swett Addition, Loomis and Maxwell also platted the Loomis Addition, located 12 “Businesses in Early Fort Collins,” Fort Collins Historical Society, https://fortcollinshistoricalsociety.org/2018/07/05/business-in-early-fort-collins/. 13 Ibid. 14 Charles B. Rosenow, “Early History of the City Government up to 1894,” Fort Collins Express, May 20, 1923; “The State Board of Agriculture,” Fort Collins Courier, May 4, 1893; “State Board Will Meet at College Next Wendesday [sic],” Weekly Courier, April 14, 1909. 15 Quit Claim Deed, Charles Sheldon to John Sheldon, October 13, 1884, Book 35, Page 109, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. 16 E.H. Hall, “Glancing Back to Thirty Years Ago,” Weekly Courier, May 31, 1912. 17 “Alfalfa- How to Raise It,” Weekly Courier, February 28, 1906. 18 “Events at Home,” Fort Collins Courier, November 17, 1887. 19 Abner Loomis and Malinda Maxwell Marriage Record, Ancestry.com. Colorado, County Marriage Records and State Index, 1862-2006 [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2016; Conservator’s Deed, Estate of Henry Sheldon to Abner and Malinda Maxwell, August 29, 1887, Book 55, Page 273, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. A conservator’s deed is made, granting title in fee simple, is made on behalf of a person incapable of representing themselves; in this case, Henry Sheldon, an “insane person” according to the deed, was represented by conservator John C. Hanna. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 26 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 between City Park and downtown Fort Collins, in 1887.19F 20 The Loomises sold a portion of this land to Emma A. Kissock in 1902.20F 21 Emma Alice Kissock, nee Sweeney, was born in New York in 1862. Before the age of twenty, she moved to Fort Collins and married John Alexander Caverhill Kissock. Emma attended Colorado Agricultural College and graduated in 1904.21F 22 During that time, she was an active member of multiple literary societies associated with the university, including the Philo Æsthesian Society, which focused on literary composition and speech, and the Columbian Literary Society, which focused on literary work and parliamentary law.22F 23 Her husband, J.A.C. Kissock, was well-known in the community for advocating for the city’s first sanitary sewer system. Despite initial opposition from the community because of cost, J.A.C. Kissock managed to persuade officials to install 2,870 feet of sewer line in 1888, and by 1911, over 19 miles of sewer had been laid. Additionally, J.A.C. Kissock and A.A. Edwards had the land just south of what would become the Swett Addition platted in 1907 as the Scott-Sherwood Addition.23F 24 In 1903, Emma and J.A.C. Kissock sold their property to John McMullin. And Irish immigrant, McMullin homesteaded land in Larimer County around Boxelder in the late nineteenth century, where he farmed and raised cattle with his wife.24F 25 Anna passed away in 1887; in 1889, John married his second wife, Ann (Anna) Quinn.25F 26 By 1900, the couple had moved into town, living on Riverside Avenue.26F 27 Anna was a member of the Ladies’ Missionary Society of the Second Presbyterian Church and traveled to convert Mexicans and Native Americans to her Protestant faith.27F 28 The McMullins sold their land to Leonard Herbert Swett in 1904.28F 29 Herbert Swett came from a well-respected family. His father, Leonard Swett, was an esteemed attorney. Leonard traveled the eighth judicial circuit of Illinois with Abraham Lincoln, who was also a lawyer; they became close friends. During the Civil War, Leonard was trusted to carry out 20 Mary Humstone, et al., Loomis Addition Historic Context, (City of Fort Collins, 2015), 6, 8, 90, https://www.fcgov.com/historicpreservation/pdf/Loomis_Addition.pdf. 21 Warranty Deed, Abner and Malinda Loomis to Emma A. Kissock, September 5, 1902, Book 173, Page 363, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. 22 Graduation Photo of Emma Kissock, Class of 1904, Image ID #H22104, File KF-KU, Biographical File Collection, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO. 23 Colorado State University, “General Catalog” (Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, 1896), 86; “Columbian Club,” Fort Collins Courier, September 15, 1898; “In Society’s Realm,” Weekly Courier, May 25, 1904. 24 “Fort Collins History and Architecture: Sugar Beets, Streetcar Suburbs, and the City Beautiful, 1900-1919,” Fort Collins History Connection: An Online Collaboration Between the FCMoD and PRPLD, https://history.fcgov.com/contexts/sugar. 25 Homestead Patent for John McMullin, Accession #COCOAA 041141, August 24, 1891, General Land Office Record Database, Bureau of Land Management, US Department of the Interior, https://glorecords.blm.gov/details/patent/default.aspx?accession=COCOAA%20041141&docClass=SER&sid=p1vkhz uc.j5d#patentDetailsTabIndex=0. 26 Judson Rhoads, “Ann Quinn McMullin (1838-2921),” Photograph, Find a Grave Index, https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/80908770 27 1900 US Census, Precinct 8, Larimer, Colorado, Ancestry.com. 1900 United States Federal Census [database on- line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004. 28 “Organize Missionary Society,” Fort Collins Courier, February 5, 1908. 29 Warranty Deed, John McMullin to Herbert Swett, September 10, 1904, Book 187, Page 418, Title Book Collection, Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 several confidential missions for the president. During Lincoln’s first term, he wrote a letter to the president about the appointment of Judge Davis to the Supreme Court, who was the judge who presided over the circuit Lincoln and Leonard Swett worked in together. Because Lincoln seemed as though he “would do nothing” regarding the appointment, Leonard soon visited the president in Washington; he told President Lincoln that the appointment would be “half for him and half for Davis,” and that he would never expect nor accept any political appointment from his friend.29F 30 Leonard Herbert Swett wrote a book dedicated to his father’s life titled, A Memorial of Leonard Swett: A Lawyer and Advocate of Illinois.30F 31 At the age of twenty-one, at the recommendation of Judge David Davis, John Wesley Powell approved Herbert Swett to join a United States Geological Survey expedition along the Colorado River in what is now northern Arizona and parts of Utah in 1879 and 1880. In addition to having his family’s “prestige” and “high connections” behind him, Herbert was an excellent mathematician, which was helped his application for the expedition. Powell helped Herbert get a position as assistant topographer, working with A.H. Thompson at Fort Wingate, New Mexico, where he worked from 1882-83. Herbert returned to work for the USGS on and off throughout the 1880s until he returned east to attend Cornell University from 1888-1903. 31F 32 Herbert Swett and his wife, Rose, came to Fort Collins in 1904 with their daughter, Laura (Burnham). According to the 1900 US census, Herbert Swett’s occupation was a “capitalist.”32F 33 In the first few years he lived in town, Herbert taught math at Colorado Agricultural College.33F 34 After purchasing McMullin’s land, he had a home built at 1160 Laporte Ave., designed by architect Albert Bryan, in 1904.34F 35 He had the Swett Addition to Fort Collins platted February 24, 1910, and it was annexed into the city the same year.35F 36 Swett’s Addition is located on either side of McKinley Avenue between Mountain and Laporte Avenues and contains two blocks with a total of twenty-two lots. In 1920, Herbert Swett sold the entire addition to Willis Edward Wright, Jr.36F 37 By the 1920s, Swett had fallen on difficult times and “led a lonely life.”37F 38 His wife, Rose, died tragically in 1914. According to newspaper articles, Rose had gone to Denver to see a friend, Mrs. Whitney Newton, and they decided “a surgical operation might be of marked benefit to her 30 “Herbert Swett, 74, Dies Here,” Coloradoan, February 27, 1934. 31 Leonard Herbert Swett, A Memorial of Leonard Swett: A Lawyer and Advocate of Illinois (Aurora, IL: Phillips Press, 1895). 32 Dove Menkes, “A Young Man Goes West: The 1879 Letters of Leonard Herbert Swett,” Utah Historical Quarterly (2007): 204-207; Dove Menkes, “A Young Man Returns to the West: The 1880 Letters of Leonard Herbert Swett,” Utah Historical Quarterly (2007): 342, 362-3. 33 1900 US Census. 34 “Herbert Swett, 74, Dies Here.” 35 “Fort Collins Still Boomin,” Fort Collins Express, December 21, 1904. 36 Plat of Swett’s Addition to the City of Fort Collins, February 24, 1910, Larimer County Official Records Search Database, https://records.larimer.org/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue&section=searchCriteriaName&quickSearchSele ction=; “Council Will Assist in Cleaning Up City,” Larimer County Independent, March 10, 1910. 37 Warranty Deed, Herbert Swett to Willis Edward Wright, December 9, 1920, Book 412, Page 262, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. 38 Menkes, “A Young Man Returns,” 363. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 28 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 general health.”38F 39 Dr. J.W. Harris, the Newton family doctor, did the operation at the Park Avenue Hospital, assisted by Dr. George W. Palmer and Dr. Steinhart, an anesthesiologist, and Miss Lee, head nurse of the hospital, among others. They found the “unexpected condition” of “abdominal adhesions” and “an unsatisfactory condition of the appendix, which was removed.”39F 40 She seemed to be recovering well from the operation, so Herbert Swett returned home to Fort Collins to have Christmas with their daughter. Soon after, Rose died in a “sudden nervous relapse incident to the shock of the operation.”40F 41 Sometime after the death of his wife, Herbert Swett became a pauper. In the 1920s, he lived at the Fort Collins YMCA.41F 42 In response to a Cornell Alumni survey inquiring about his address, Swett replied: “’Have none; have been a homeless tramp for seven years.’”42F 43 By 1930, he made his way out to El Centro, California and lived with his daughter. He passed away in 1934.43F 44 Willis Edward Wright, Jr. and his family came to Fort Collins in 1905. His father, Willis Edward Wright, was a prominent businessman in the community, dabbling in diverse ventures, including co-founding the Collins Percheron Horse Company in 1908 and investing in a million-dollar company of Fort Collins capitalists to build and operate a cane sugar factory in Florida.44F 45 The younger Wright graduated from Fort Collins High School in 1909 and married his wife, Ruth, in 1915.45F 46 In addition to working as a farmer,46F 47 he was a partner in a well-known men’s clothing store called “The Hub” located at 125 N. College Ave. from the late 1910s into the early 1920s.47F 48 In 1920, Wright, Jr. was elected president of the Commercial Club, an organization dedicated to advertising for Fort Collins area, assisting students and other civilians in finding homes and employment, and other general assistance to the public.48F 49 A successful businessman like his father, Wright, Jr. was able to both purchase the entire Swett Addition from Herbert Swett in 1920 and construct a $15,000 bungalow on West Oak Street, “one of the finest residences in the city” at the time.49F 50 He later served as Larimer County Assessor from 1939 to 1955.50F 51 Wright, Jr. sold just three of twenty-two lots in the Swett Addition individually. He sold the remainder of the subdivision to Lewis Clark Moore in 1922.51F 52 L.C. Moore came to Fort Collins in 39 “Facts Concerning the Death of Mrs. Swett,” Larimer County Independent, January 1, 1915. 40 Ibid. 41 Ibid. 42 1927 Polk’s Fort Collins, Loveland and Larimer County Directory (Colorado Springs: R.L. Polk Directory Co., 1927). 43 L.H. Swett (1927) quoted in Menkes, “A Young Man Returns to the West.” 44 Ibid. 45 “From Friday’s Daily,” Fort Collins Courier, April 29, 1908; “Local Men Buy Florida Lands,” Weekly Courier, October 7, 1908. 46 Wright, W. Ed. Biography, Photo, Wright, W. Ed., Jr. Biographical File, Biographical File Collection, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO. 47 “Farmer Asks $12,000 Damages on Drainage,” Loveland Daily Herald, Vol. 8, No. 326, December 13, 1917; 48 “Announcement: The Hub,” Advertisement, Fort Collins Courier, July 1, 1919; “The Hub’s Big $50,000 Dissolution of Partnership Sale,” Fort Collins Courier, August 25, 1921. 49 “Commercial Club Activities Past Two Months,” Fort Collins Courier, January 8, 1920. Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 1887, and “his progress upward on the ladder of fortune” was “rapid and safe.”52F 53 He became president of the Commercial Bank & Trust Company, President of the North Poudre Irrigation Company, and President of the buckeye Land and Development Company. Moore was also involved with the construction of several reservoirs in the region, including the Halligan Reservoir.53F 54 The same year that Moore purchased the Swett Addition, he subdivided an area of the Lake Park Addition into three parts, known as L.C. Moore’s First, Second, and Third Additions.54F 55 Additionally, L.C. Moore had the College Heights Addition platted in 1925, which newspapers touted as “’one of the most perfect lying pieces of ground ever brought into the city as an addition.’”55F 56 Beyond his business interests, Moore was “strongly attached to his home” and “a public-spirited citizen.”56F 57 For example, in 1923, he donated a site spanning three city blocks for the construction of a new high school building, which was desperately needed at the time.57F 58 Over a number of years, Moore sold off the lots of Swett’s Addition. Lot 6, Block 2, later 129 N. McKinley Ave., was sold to Mary Christensen, wife of Cement contractor and sewerman Dan Christensen,58F 59 in 1925. The deed prescribed that no residence would be built on the lot costing less than $3000.59F 60 Christensen never built a house on the lot, but she retained it for almost twenty years, selling to Ralph Easterling, a barber,60F 61 and his wife, Mildred, in 1946.61F 62 Less than a year later, the Easterlings sold the lot to James A. Cross, Sr., who, less than four months later, sold to C.J. Wetzler, a mechanic, and Elmer D. Schultz, a bricklayer.62F 63 Based on the value of the stamps on the deeds, these transactions did not include a house. Wetzler and Schultz constructed a house on this lot in June 1948, according to building permits.63F 64 ARCHITECTURE Wetzler and Schultz constructed a residence on Lot 6, Block 2 of Swett’s Addition of the Minimal Traditional building type. Constructed mostly just before and after World War II, Minimal 53 Ansel Watrous, History of Larimer County, Colorado (Fort Collins, CO: Courier Printing & Publishing Company, 1911), 413. 54 Ibid. 55 “Fort Collins History and Architecture: Post World War I Urban Growth, 1919-1941,” Fort Collins History Connection: An Online Collaboration Between the FCMoD and PRPLD, https://history.fcgov.com/contexts/post.php. 56 Ibid. 57 Watrous, 413; “State News,” CEA: Colorado School Journal, Vol. 39 (1923):30. 58 “State News.” 59 1940 US Census, Sheet 8B, Fort Collins, Larimer, Colorado, Ancestry.com. 1940 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004. 60 Warranty Deed, L.C. Moore to Mary Christensen, January 12, 1925, Book 501, Page 359, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. 61 “Announcing the Sale of Crandall’s Barber Shop,” Advertisement, Coloradoan, April 9, 1950. 62 Warranty Deed, Mary Christensen to Ralph E. and Mildred R. Easterling, March 26, 1946, Book 807, Page 481, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. 63 Warranty Deed, Ralph E. and Mildred R. Easterling to James A. Cross, Sr., October 15, 1947, Book 842, Page 170, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO; Warranty Deed, James A. Cross, Sr. to C.J. Wetzler and Elmer D. Schultz, Book 848, Page 416, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO; “Elmer Schultz,” Coloradoan, August 19, 1977; Sheely-Nelson Motor Co., Advertisement, Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Traditional houses had simple, boxy plans and were inexpensive to build. These houses were usually one story with simple, low to medium-pitched roofs with closed eaves that have little or no overhang. Often, as in the case of the house at 129 N. McKinley Ave., Minimal Traditional houses feature a front-gabled section over the front entry. History Colorado notes that Minimal Traditional architecture is based to some extent on the Tudor Revival style and often echoes some features of that style.64F 65 For example, the house built at 129 N. McKinley Ave. has little ornamentation in general, but includes a prominent brick chimney and uses a textured brick, both elements associated with Tudor Revival style. The house on the Lois Struble Property, however, is transitional between Minimal Traditional and Ranch architecture. Built at the end of the 1940s, this house picks up elements of the Ranch building type. For instance, the prominent chimney is quite wide, which is often seen on Ranch houses. The garage is also located at the front of the property, attached to the house, which is much more typical of Ranch architecture, which made the garage an integral part of the house, than Minimal Traditional architecture. But unlike Ranch houses, this house remains somewhat boxy rather than horizontally oriented and elongated, and it lacks the Ranch house’s characteristic picture window and rear porch for outdoor living space. Because this house hybridizes elements of both the Minimal Traditional and Ranch building types, it is a somewhat unusual example of postwar architecture in Fort Collins. Because the 1948 Tax Assessor record photo shows this house’s basement entrance stairway at the front of the house, it is probable that this house was built by Wetzler and Schultz as an over- under duplex. It began to be used as a duplex shortly after its construction. OWNERSHIP AND TENANT HISTORY Wetzler and Schultz most likely knew each other because they were both veterans who were officers in the “Gold Brick Pup Tent of the Military Order of Cooties;” Wetzler was a “Seam Squirrel (Commander), and Schultz was a “Shirt Reader” (Master of Ceremonies).65F 66 This organization continues to be an honor degree membership organization of the Veterans of Foreign Wars.66F 67 Wetzler and Schultz did not hold onto their property for long. They built the house on their lot in June 1948; it is unknown whether Schultz, a bricklayer, was one of the builders. In March 1949, they sold to John W. and Villa Vetter. John and his wife, Villa, and their two sons, John and Maynard,67F 68 moved to Fort Collins at the end of the 1940s. John worked as a custodian at CSU, according to City Directories.68F 69 Less than a year 65 “Minimal Traditional,” History Colorado, https://www.historycolorado.org/minimal-traditional. 66 “Officers Installed by Cootie Group,” Coloradoan, November 23, 1939. 67 The Military Order of Cooties has fun as one of its primary objectives, supporting the entertainment of veterans. The Order also maintains an orphanage in Michigan as well as a fire department. The VFW website claims that the name “cootie” came from WWI as a reference to lice because, as the organization lore goes, all the different varieties of lice from America, Algeria, India, France, Britain, etc. came together during the war, carried by soldiers, and bred to create hyper-intelligent lice, which would bite soldiers at just the right time to save their lives. A soldier would duck down to scratch at the bites or “shirt read” just as a shell burst above them. (“Military Order of the Cootie,” Veterans of Foreign Wars, https://vfwde.com/di/vfw/v2/default.asp?pid=56694.) 68 1940 US Census, Sheet 2B. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 31 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 later, they sold the property to G.F. and Mabel Morton.69F 70 Mr. Morton worked as a real estate agent, according to newspaper advertisements.70F 71 They quickly sold to John and Nellie Burgess later in 1950.71F 72 The Burgesses lived in Wyoming in the 1940s; based on City Directory records, they lived in Fort Collins in 1952,72F 73 but by 1953, they lived once more in Wyoming for John’s work in the oil and gas industry.73F 74 In 1952, they sold their house to Bessie Hauk Ratliff, who retained the property and used it primarily as a rental until her death.74F 75 1952 was the first year that City Directories listed addresses for this property as 129 and 129 ½ N. McKinley Ave. This house was used as a duplex from 1952 to 1959 consistently, then inconsistently from that point onward. In 1952, the Burgesses were listed in the upper portion and Chester Force and his wife, Verna, in the lower part. Vern worked as a cook, and Chester was a ranch hand at Red Stone Ranch.75F 76 In 1954, Bessie Ratliff and her husband, Jesse B., were listed as living at 129 N. McKinley Ave., and Tom Ross and Lillie (Ratliff) Carroll were listed at 129 ½. Before moving to Fort Collins, the Ratliffs lived in Las Animas County, Colorado, where Jesse worked as a livestock rancher and Bessie worked as a postmaster.76F 77 Their daughter Lillie and her husband, Tom Ross Carroll, a student at Colorado A&M who would later become a veterinarian, lived in the lower unit of the house in 1954. Bessie her husband moved out of the upper unit, and Tom and Lillie took their place by 1956; the lower unit was vacant that year.77F 78 When Bessie Ratliff passed away, in 1966, her estate bequeathed the property to her children: Jesse Aaron, James Martin, and Lynn Ratliff, and Lillie (Ratliff) Carroll.78F 79 The Ratliff children all moved to New Mexico by the late 1950s where Tom Ross Carroll, Lillie’s husband, worked as a veterinarian, and James Martin was his veterinary assistant. Lillie and her husband continued to live in New Mexico for the rest of their lives, but her brothers, Jesse, James, and Lynn all moved 69 Fort Collins City Directory: 1950 (Colorado Springs: Rocky Mountain Directory Co., 1950), City Directory Collection, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO. 70 Warranty Deed, John W. and Villa Vetter to G.F. and Mabel Morton, January 30, 1950, Book 887, Page 359, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. 71 Advertisement, Coloradoan, June 18, 1950. 72 Warranty Deed, G.F. and Mabel Morton to John and Nellie Burgess, September 27, 1950, Book 899, Page 427, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. 73 Fort Collins City Directory: 1952 (Colorado Springs: Rocky Mountain Directory Co., 1950), City Directory Collection, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO. 74 Laramie, WY City Directory: 1953, Ancestry.com. U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011. 75 Warranty Deed, John and Nellie Burgess to Bessie Ratliff, July 9, 1952, Book 933, Page 413, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. 76 Fort Collins City Directory: 1952. 77 1940 US Census; Las Animas County, Ancestry.com. U.S., Appointments of U. S. Postmasters, 1832-1971 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010. 78 Fort Collins City Directory: 1954 (Colorado Springs: Rocky Mountain Directory Co., 1950), City Directory Collection, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO; Fort Collins City Directory: 1956 (Colorado Springs: Rocky Mountain Directory Co., 1950), City Directory Collection, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO. 79 Decree, Estate of Bessie Ratliff to Jessie aaron, James Martin, and Lynne Ratliff, and Lillie Carroll, March 4, 1966, Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 to Llano County, Texas until their passing.79F 80 None of the Ratliff children were living in Fort Collins when they inherited their mother’s McKinley Avenue property in 1966; James and Jesse, doing business as the Ratliff Brothers, purchased the property from their siblings that same year and continued to use it as a rental property.80F 81 In 1957, Charles L. and Lois Struble moved into 129 N. McKinley Ave, with Dale E. Williams, a student, and his wife, Pat, a teacher at Dunn School, in 129 ½.81F 82 The Strubles lived in the Fort Collins area by 1950, based on Charles Struble’s first appearance in a newspaper article,82F 83 but they first appeared in Fort Collins City Directories in 1952; they lived at 616 S. Mason St. Lois worked as a stenographer for Guarantee Reserve Insurance Company, and Charles worked as an assistant manager at Poudre Valley News.83F 84 Although the Strubles moved into the house at 129 N. McKinley Ave. in 1957, they did not purchase the property from the Ratliffs until 1976.84F 85 In 1957, Charles worked as Assistant Manager at Alpert and Sons;85F 86 in 1958, he worked for the Don Farnham Agency as an insurance salesman/real estate agent;86F 87 and from 1959 until the early 1980s, he worked as a traveling salesman for Karman Inc. of Denver, a purveyor of western products.87F 88 He was also a committeeman of the Optimist Club, a service club focused on “bringing out the best in youth, in our communities, and in ourselves.”88F 89 In association with the Optimist Club, Charles Struble managed the Fort Collins boxing team who participated in the Golden Gloves boxing tournament in Denver. He set up facilities and training opportunities for boys who wanted to participate in the competition.89F 90 Lois Struble was born in Hiattville, an unincorporated community in Bourbon County, Kansas, in 1921, where she grew up on her family’s farm. She was later employed as a secretary. She lost her fiancée during World War II; he died on the USS Arizona during the attack on Pearl Harbor. She married Charles L. Struble March 21, 1943. 90F 91 Charles was also a military man; he enlisted in the army, Branch 1: A, in October of 1942, and was released in November 1945.91F 92 By the time they moved to Fort Collins around 1950, they had two daughters, Sharon and Charlene. Soon after moving into 129 N. McKinley Ave., Lois became a stay-at-home mother to her daughters, 80 Ratliff Family, Find-a-Grave Index, https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/51893614/lynn-ratliff. 81 Warranty Deed, Lillie Elizabeth Carroll, J.A., J.M., and Lynn Ratliff to J.A. and J.M. Ratliff, August 31, 1966, Title Book Collection, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. 82 Fort Collins City Directory: 1957 (Colorado Springs: Rocky Mountain Directory Co., 1950), City Directory Collection, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO. 83 “Two Auto Crashes,” Coloradoan, September 6, 1950. 84 Fort Collins City Directory: 1952. 85 Warranty Deed, Instrument #171200, J.A. and J.M. Ratliff to Charles L. and Lois A. Struble, September 13, 1976, Larimer County Official Records Search Database, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, https://records.larimer.org/landmarkweb. 86 Fort Collins City Directory: 1957. 87 “Don Farnham Agency,” Advertisement, Coloradoan, August 29, 1958. 88 City Directory Collection, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO. 89 “Bike Winner,” Coloradoan, April 29, 1957. Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 who both still live in Fort Collins. Lois fastidiously tended their home’s garden; she was known for the irises she grew in their large back yard. She was also known for her skills as a craftswoman; she made quilts, sewed, and knitted. She made clothes for herself and her daughters, as well as intricate clothes for their dolls. Living at 129 N. McKinley Ave. for more than fifty years, she became the neighborhood’s historian. She recalled stories of all the different families and individuals who lived in the Swett Addition over the years. She and Charles both lived at 129 N. McKinley Ave. until they passed away, Charles in 1989 and Lois in 2018.92F 93 By 1960, Dale and Pat Williams moved out of 129 ½ N. McKinley Ave. According to City Directories, the lower apartment remained vacant or was not listed until 1977. However, it is probable that Charles and Lois’s daughters, Charlene (Miller), Sharon (Davis), and Sharon’s children Kelly and Marcy, shared the lower apartment. Both daughters worked as nurse’s aides from 1966-1968.93F 94 By 1970, Charlene had moved out, but Sharon remained at the house on McKinley Avenue, working for Zoric Laundry.94F 95 Sharon continued to be listed with her parents either at 129 or 129 ½ N. McKinley Ave. until 1977.95F 96 CONCLUSION Although Charles Leo Struble passed away in 1989, Lois continued to list him as the primary contact at 129 N. McKinley Ave. in City Directories until the early 2000s. Starting at that point, City Directories began to list only Lois Struble at this address. Anita Lois Struble died on September 15, 2018. Her granddaughter, Anita Lois Miller, served as her personal representative in the sale of her McKinley Avenue property, which was sold to Kimberly Baker Medina and Ramon Medina Aguilera in 2019.96F 97 Kimberly Medina would like to honor the memory of Lois’s life at this house by using her name in the Landmark title. 93 Medina. Charles quit-claimed the deed to 129 N. McKinley Ave. to Lois A. Struble May 20, 1988 (Instrument #19880023374), and Lois A. Struble quit-claimed to Lois Struble (herself) August 25, 2006 (Instrument #20060085017) 94 City Directory Collection. 95 Fort Collins, Colorado 1970 City Directory (Loveland, CO: Johnson Publishing Company, 1970), City Directory Collection, Local History Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Fort Collins, CO. 96 City Directory Collection. 97 Personal Representatives Deed, Instrument #20190031888, Anita Lois Struble, AKA Lois A. Struble, deceased (Anita Lois Miller, representative) to Kimberly Baker Medina and Ramon Medina Aguilera, June 12, 2019, Larimer County Official Records Search Database, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, https://records.larimer.org/landmarkweb. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 34 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION Construction Date: 1948 Architect/Builder: C.J. Wetzler and Elmer D. Schultz (builders) Building Materials: Brick, concrete, wood Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional Description: The Struble property is a single-story, Minimal Traditional style residence built as an over-under duplex with a finished basement. It sits on a small lot on North McKinley Avenue with a sidewalk and dense, mature street tree cover consisting mostly of elms (Ulmus sp.). There is a small setback from the street filled with a planted grass lawn and a non-historic paver walkway. The historic driveway leads up to the garage along the north side of the lot with concrete sidewalk leading to both duplex entries. The rear yard is open, consisting mostly of planted grass, some flower beds, a patio space, a clothesline, and bounded on its sides by historic wire fencing or non- historic wood privacy fencing. Maintained planting beds surround the building on most sides at the foundation. The building has a gabled-ell configuration and exterior walls that are a red brick veneer over poured concrete walls, with a concrete foundation. The roof is hipped with a large, gable-front ell on the east façade, with minimal boxed eaves, metal gutters with downspouts, and asphalt composition shingling. Windows are generally wood sash windows with brick sills and lintels, often with metal storm windows over-top, as well as three-light wood awning windows along the foundation. The east façade facing McKinley Avenue is defined by the large gable-ell off the front of the building, with a prominent, wide but shallow chimney on the front to the left of the entry and a triangular attic vent above the upper entry. On the upper duplex unit, the entry is centered with a brick stoop (that has been resurfaced with concrete) with a non-historic metal railing. Below the entry is a concrete stair that leads down from the drive, with the centered entry for the basement unit housed underneath – this stair also has a non-historic metal railing along the outside (east) half-wall. Flanking the upper entry are two-over-two sash windows of different sizes, with matching wood awning windows flanking the basement entry. On the north elevation of the gable-ell are a two-over-two wood sash window over a wood basement awning window, offset slightly. To the north of the gable-ell is a wood overhead track garage door with a four-by- eight panel configuration, with two glazed panels for garage lighting. Along the north elevation is a single two-three wood hopper window for the upper unit, with a pair of wood awning windows for the basement. Otherwise, the north elevation is unbroken. On the upper-level south elevation, there are two wood two-over-two sash windows and then a pair of wood, two-over-two sash windows near the southeast corner. The south basement level has a series of three matching one-by-three awning windows. The rear (west) elevation includes a wood panel door with 2x2 upper glazing near the northwest corner, providing rear yard access for both units. A small concrete patio surrounds this entry, and ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 35 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 to the north of the entry is a one-by-three fixed wood window. To the south of the entry are three two-over-two wood sash windows of varying sizes. Along the foundation are four one-by- three awning windows matching those elsewhere on the building. There is a non-historic utility meter panel and air conditioning unit on the rear elevation near the center as well. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 36 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 REFERENCE LIST or SOURCES of INFORMATION Archives and Online Databases Ancestry.com. Marriage and Census Records. City of Fort Collins Public Records Database, City of Fort Collins, CO. https://citydocs.fcgov.com/. Colorado Historic Newspapers Collection. https://www.coloradohistoricnewspapers.org/ Fort Collins History Connection, Fort Collins Museum of Discovery. https://history.fcgov.com. Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, Local History Archive. Larimer County Tax Assessor Records. Fort Collins, CO. https://www.larimer.org/assessor/search#/property/. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. General Land Office Records database. https://glorecords.blm.gov/default.aspx Books, Reports, and Articles History Colorado. “Minimal Traditional.” https://www.historycolorado.org/minimal-traditional. Fort Collins Historical Society. “Businesses in Early Fort Collins.” https://fortcollinshistoricalsociety.org/2018/07/05/business-in-early-fort-collins/. Humstone, Mary, et al. Loomis Addition Historic Context. City of Fort Collins: 2015, https://www.fcgov.com/historicpreservation/pdf/Loomis_Addition.pdf Menkes, Dove. “A Young Man Goes West: The 1879 Letters of Leonard Herbert Swett.” Utah Historical Quarterly (2007): 204-207. ---. “A Young Man Returns to the West: The 1880 Letters of Leonard Herbert Swett.” Utah Historical Quarterly (2007): 342, 362-3. Public Lands History Center. “Early Agricultural Colonies and Cooperative Irrigating.” Colorado State University. https://publiclands.colostate.edu/digital_projects/dp/poudre-river/crops- livestock/agricultural-colonies/. Shepard, Kenton, and Nick Gromicko. “Mastering Roof Inspections: Wood Shakes and Shingles, Part 3.” International Association of Certified Home Inspectors. https://www.nachi.org/wood-shakes-shingles-part3-135.htm. Accessed January 27, 2020. Swett, Leonard Herbert. A Memorial of Leonard Swett: A Lawyer and Advocate of Illinois Aurora, IL: Phillips Press, 1895. Watrous, Ansel. History of Larimer County, Colorado. Fort Collins, CO: Courier Printing & Publishing Company, 1911. Willard, James F., ed. The Union Colony at Greeley, Colorado: 1869-1871, Volume 1. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, 1918. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 37 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 MAPS and PHOTOGRAPHS ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 38 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 39 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 1: East façade of 129 N. McKinley, looking west, c. 1950s (Medina personal collection). Photo 2: East façade, looking west from McKinley Avenue, December 18, 2019. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 40 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 3: McKinley Avenue, showing west side including 129 N. at photo right. December 18, 2019. Photo 4: Basement level entry on east façade, looking south. December 18, 2019. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 41 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 5: Rear yard, looking west toward alley. December 18, 2019. Photo 6 (Left): Garage door on east façade, looking southwest. December 18, 2019. Photo 7 (Right): Windows south of garage door on east façade, looking south. December 18, 2019. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 42 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 8: Window on north elevation, looking south. December 18, 2019. Photo 9: Rear (west) elevation, looking southeast. December 18, 2019. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 43 Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 Photo 10: South elevation, looking west. December 18, 2019. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 44 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 45 1 Application for Fort Collins Landmark Designation – 129 North McKinley Avenue, Lois Struble Property Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission February 19, 2020 Maps & Photos 2 129 N. McKinley Ave, Lois Struble Property 1 2 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 46 • Construction: • 1948 by C.J. Wetzler and Elmer D. Schultz • Standards of Significance: • 3 (Design/Construction) • Exterior Integrity: Location, Design, Setting, Materials, Workmanship, Feeling, and Association • Historical Notes: • Lois (and Charles) Struble (occupant 1957 to 2018; owned 1976 to 2018). 3 129 N. McKinley Ave, Lois Struble Property Left: Lois & Charles Struble; Below: Lois Struble (Medina) 4 129 N. McKinley Ave, Lois Struble Property 129 N. McKinley, c.1950s (Medina) East façade facing N. McKinley Avenue. 3 4 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 47 Role of the Landmark Preservation Commission Determine whether criteria are satisfied: (1) The proposed resource is eligible for designation (1) Significance (2) Integrity (2) The requested designation will advance the policies and the purposes in a manner and extent sufficient to justify the requested designation Adopt a motion making a recommendation to Council 5 6 Application for Fort Collins Landmark Designation – 129 North McKinley Avenue, Lois Struble Property Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission February 19, 2020 5 6 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 48 DRAFT RESOLUTION 3, 2020 OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDING LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF THE LOIS STRUBLE PROPERTY 129 NORTH MCKINLEY AVENUE, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO AS A FORT COLLINS LANDMARK PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 14 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS WHEREAS, it is a matter of public policy that the protection, enhancement and perpetuation of sites, structures, objects, and districts of historic, architectural, archeological, or geographic significance, located within the city, are a public necessity and are required in the interest of the prosperity, civic pride and general welfare of the people; and WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the City Council that the economic, cultural and aesthetic standing of this City cannot be maintained or enhanced by disregarding the historic, architectural, archeological and geographical heritage of the City and by ignoring the destruction or defacement of such cultural assets; and WHEREAS, the LOIS STRUBLE PROPERTY, located at 129 NORTH MCKINLEY AVENUE in Fort Collins (the “Property”) is eligible for Landmark designation for the property’s high degree of integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association, as described in City Code Section 14-22(b); and for its outstanding significance to Fort Collins under STANDARD 3, contained in City Code Section 14-22(a): DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION; and WHEREAS, the Landmark Preservation Commission has determined that the Property meets the criteria of a landmark as set forth in Section l4-22 of the code and is eligible for designation as a Fort Collins Landmark; and WHEREAS, the owner of the Property has consented to such landmark designation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Landmark Preservation Commission of the City of Fort Collins as follows: Section 1. That the foregoing recitals are incorporated herein by the Landmark Preservation Commission as findings of fact: 1. That the designation of this property will advance the City of Fort Collins’ Policies and Purposes for Landmark Preservation; and 2. That the property is significant under Standard 3, Design/Construction, as this property is a significant reflection of a Minimal Traditional duplex in Fort Collins, and a unique reflection of the transitional architecture reflective of the Swett’s Addition; and ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 49 DRAFT City of Fort Collins Landmark Preservation Commission Resolution No. 3, 2020 2 3. That the property retains a strong preponderance of integrity in all seven aspects: Location, Design, Materials, Workmanship, Setting, Feeling and Association; and 4. That the owner’s desire to protect this historic property and its resources will be furthered by the property’s status as a Fort Collins Landmark and the accompanying protections and review mechanisms such designation confers; and Section 2. That the Property located in the City of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado, described as follows, to wit: LOT 6, BLOCK 2, SWETT’S ADDITION, FORT COLLINS ALSO KNOWN BY STREET AND NUMBER AS 129 NORTH MCKINLEY AVENUE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO be designated as a Fort Collins Landmark in accordance with Chapter l4 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins. Section 3. That the criteria contained in Chapter 14, Article IV of the City Code will serve as the standards by which alterations, additions and other changes to buildings and structures located upon the above described property will be reviewed. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission of the City of Fort Collins held this 19th day of FEBRUARY, A.D. 2020. X NAME Chair ATTEST: _______________________ Secretary/Staff ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 50 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 1 STAFF REPORT February 19, 2020 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME 720 W PROSPECT (EMMA BROWN/SUSAN WINTER HOUSE) – DESIGN REVIEW STAFF Maren Bzdek, Senior Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Exterior rehabilitation work (window rehab, in-kind stucco repair and paint, rehab wood barge rafters and rafter tails, replacement asphalt roof, new half-round gutters and downspouts) on the landmarked residence. Construction of a new three-story apartment building behind the historic residences. APPLICANT/OWNER: Ian Schuff, alm2s; CSU Research Foundation (CSURF)/Maximo Development RECOMMENDATION: Approval ROLE OF LPC: Approve or deny the applicant’s request for a certificate of appropriateness. BACKGROUND: • Designated as a Fort Collins Landmark in 2007 for architectural and historical significance, as a vernacular farmhouse with Craftsman details that conveys the areas historic use for small, 1 to 2-acre hobby farms. • Constructed circa 1935; property developed by prominent local physician Dr. Thaddeus Brown (who lived next door at “Brownmar,” 730 W. Prospect) for his widowed mother • Proposed work would include rehabilitation of various historic features on the historic residence at 720 W Prospect, a new asphalt roof, and construction of a new three-story apartment building behind the designated landmark and the abutting residence at 730 W Prospect, which is also a historic resource (eligible for landmark designation) and has a similar rehabilitation plan for adaptive reuse for the project. ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION: The residence at 720 W Prospect exhibits many of the characteristic elements of the Craftsman style of architecture. This is most evident in the building’s exposed rafters and purlins, its 6/1 double hung sash windows, and its multi-light front entry door. Additionally, its wall cladding material, of stucco over frame, is typical of the style, as is its raised concrete foundation. The residence is a one-story, side-gabled, vernacular building that faces toward the south. The side-gabled roof exhibits the historic gutters and downspouts. Two chimneys are present along the ridge line, both constructed of brick and finished with stucco. The main entry is approached by way of a flagstone patio in front of the home. The entry consists of the original 15-light wood door with flanking 10-light sidelights. An old wood storm door with 8 lights is also present. Other interesting original features include a wood threshold, wood surrounds, and all of the early hardware. Packet Pg. 51 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 2 BUILDING ALTERATIONS TO DATE: • Picture window (9) added on façade: The opening now occupied by the front picture window was originally filled by a band of three 6/1 double hung sash windows, matching the band of windows still existing on the main body of the house. • Eight additional window sash replacements: Original windows have been replaced with vinyl double hung windows (2,4, 5, 20, 21), a vinyl slider (3) and a small vinyl picture window (1). • Interior demolition/remodel: In 2008, the previous owner undertook a complete interior remodel which did not include alterations to exterior features. • Screened porch demolished: A screened porch on the rear of the home, which appeared to have been constructed prior to the mid-1960s, has been removed since the property was designated as a landmark in 2007. • Garage demolished: The original 14’ x 24’ garage was not part of the 2007 designation and was demolished in 2017 with approval from Historic Preservation staff. The site also contains a brick-lined well, likely constructed c. 1933, at about the time that the residence was built. The well is a locally rare example of a once common historic resource. While the garage and well would have qualified for inclusion in the Landmark designation, the owner requested that only the house and land be designated as a landmark, facilitating the demolition of the garage and well, if needed, in the future. HISTORY OF DESIGN REVIEW • 2008: The LPC provided a conceptual review of a similar development proposal from the previous owner, who also planned to construct a three-story apartment building with below ground parking in the same location. No details regarding exterior changes to the residence at 730 W Prospect were included in the proposal. LPC recommendations at that time focused on creating design compatibility on the south elevation of the new construction closest to the historic residential buildings. Specific suggestions included adding setbacks to the south apartment building elevation and using similar materials and roof treatments (including low-pitched shed roof dormers). • April 17, 2019: LPC provided a conceptual design review for this proposal. LPC recommendations included the following (see attached minutes excerpt): o Recommended leaving awning feature in place over picture window. o Recommended improvements to better connect the buildings with the drive and tree line. o Discussed options for compatible landscaping and hardscaping features, including the space between new construction and the historic buildings. o Expressed comfort with staff-level finalization of window rehabilitation and stucco repair details. o Requested material samples and final product details for final review process. HISTORY OF FUNDED WORK/USE OF INCENTIVES: This property has no associated landmark rehabilitation loans or tax credit projects. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK: The applicant is seeking a certificate of appropriateness for the following items: • EW1: Existing exterior wall with new elastomeric paint installed over existing stucco finish on lath over paper over 1x wood wall sheathing on 2x4 wood stud framing at 16" o.c. Provide and install new blown in cellulose insulation and 5/8" gypsum board finish at inside face with texture, primer and paint finish per specs. • EW2: Existing exterior wall with new elastomeric paint installed over new 3-coat portland cement & lime-based stucco system over existing lath over existing weather resistant stucco paper. Provide and install new blown in cellulose insulation and 5/8" gypsum board finish at inside face with texture, primer and paint finish per specs. Match new stucco textured finish with the existing roughcast or splatterdash stucco texture. Packet Pg. 52 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 3 • EW6: Existing wood sash window to be rehabilitated - see window study in applicant packet for detailed rehabilitation notes. • R1: New 30-year Class 4 high profile architectural asphalt shingles on 30 lbs asphalt impregnated building paper with Grace ice and water shield at eaves & valleys with secondary underlayment on 15/32" OSB roof sheathing on existing 1x wood ship sheathing. Repair or replace any deteriorated skip sheathing prior to installing new OSB roof sheathing. Provide new galvanized drip edge flashing at both rake and eave conditions. Provide and install new R-49 blown-in insulation at existing attic space Re: Struct. • R2: New galvanized 5" half round gutters with galvanized steel hangers to be install at existing exposed 2x6 rafter tails at the existing roof eaves. • R3: New 3" diameter round galvanized downspouts including galvanized steel elbows and mounting hangers. • R4: Existing 2x8 wood barge rafter to be scraped, sanded and rehabilitated with 2-part epoxy filler and or consolidation utilized at areas with dry rot. Provide new 1-coat primer and 2-coat paint finish. • R5: Existing 2x6 exposed wood rafter tails to be scraped, sanded and rehabilitated with 2-part epoxy filler and or consolidation utilized at areas with dry rot. Provide new 1-coat primer and 2-coat paint finish. • R7: Existing brick chimney with stucco finish to receive stucco patching and repair to match existing stucco finish. Provide a galvanized metal cap flashing with drip edge to provide a weather tight seal. • Determine if replacement of 7 non-original vinyl windows is required (see detailed diagrams in applicant materials and window schedule below). • Potential replacement of two original hopper windows (15, 16). • Window and door rehabilitation (WS1-WS10): See detailed diagrams in applicant materials and notes in chart below. Packet Pg. 53 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 4 STAFF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Upon review of the application, staff has identified the following list of information that will need to be provided to complete the design review process: • Follow up on conceptual review request to provide photos of each entrance, including flagstone entrance and walk, details of condition, and plans for required work as needed. • Submit a finalized plan of protection to staff during the FDP process, reflecting any requests from staff or LPC and showing how historic resources will be protected from damage during rehabilitation work and during construction of the apartment building on the site. PUBLIC COMMENTS SUMMARY: No public comment about this project has been received at this time. EVALUATION OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Standard Met (Y/N) SOI #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The proposed exterior alterations on the historic residence at 720 W Prospect meet this standard because the work allows for adaptive reuse of the structure through simple repair and rehabilitation of the existing historic features and materials, while avoiding the addition of incompatible features or additions to the original historic structure. Yes Packet Pg. 54 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 5 SOI #10 New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. The historic buildings on this site, including the landmark residence at 720 West Prospect, have already survived a major loss of context due to the rezoning of the area and general urbanization of a formerly agricultural “hobby farm” character. Related new construction on this site, if removed in the future, would not impair the essential form and integrity of the historic property beyond the impairments to the site and context that already exist today. Yes SOI #5 Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. The proposed exterior alterations on the historic residence at 720 W Prospect appears to meet this standard because all of the proposed work allows preserves and rehabilitates the existing historic features and materials. The Commission should provide a decision on the matter of whether the 7 non- original vinyl windows should be replaced with a more compatible window product, as well as provide final guidance on the applicant’s request regarding potential replacement of two original hopper windows (15, 16). TBD SOI #6 Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. The proposed exterior alterations on the historic residence at 720 W Prospect appears to meet this standard because all of the proposed work allows preserves and rehabilitates the existing historic features and materials. Yes SOI #7 Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. The applicant has proposed rehabilitation work that considers the particular conditions of each building feature and uses a minimalist approach to improve condition and character. Yes Packet Pg. 55 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 6 SOI #1 A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. The proposal meets this standard because it includes adaptive reuse of the residence at 720 W Prospect as additional dwelling space and/or common space for the residents of the apartments, while requiring only minimal rehabilitation and repairs to the exterior historic materials and features. Yes SOI #4 Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. The picture window that replaced the original set of three double-hung windows was a mid-century alteration. While it changed the original window pattern on the façade, it represents a typical mid-twentieth century alteration to modernize older building stock and can be considered an alteration that has acquired its own significance. The canopy over the window is part of that alteration and should be preserved, based on the feedback presented by the Commission at conceptual review. The rear screen porch construction date was noted as prior to the mid-1960s, but it was already removed by previous owner. Yes SOI #3 Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. No conjectural features that create a false sense of historical development are associated with this proposal. Yes SOI #2 The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. The recent construction of large apartment buildings on Prospect and Lake Streets have dramatically altered the historic setting of 720 W Prospect. The addition of a large, three-story apartment building immediately behind the historic residences at 720 and 730 W Prospect, the construction of a common plaza on the site further alters the setting, which was semi-rural in character. However, staff feels this standard is no longer applicable because the historic setting and character are already lost. This proposal does retain the existing mature landscaping in front of the residences and the original driveway entrance off of Prospect, which helps to preserve what historic character does remain. The scale of the three-story apartment building also provides a more gradual transition to the much larger developments to the north and west. N/A SOI #8 Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. N/A Packet Pg. 56 Agenda Item 4 Item 4, Page 7 INDEPENDENT EVALUATION SUMMARY Staff has not sought input from History Colorado (the State Historic Preservation Office) or from independent experts on this project. FINDINGS OF FACT: In evaluating the request for alterations to 720 W. Prospect, a designated Fort Collins Landmark, staff makes the following findings of fact: • The proposal incorporates several key principles for meeting the Standards: retention of historic buildings on the site; exterior rehabilitation and repair of historic materials to maintain and improve integrity; appropriate siting of new construction at the rear; and the use of landscaping to buffer the visual impact from the street. • The applicant has provided details regarding proposed rehabilitation methodology that indicate compliance with the Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the rehabilitation details provided indicate an adaptive reuse plan for the historic buildings on the development site that meets all of the applicable Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Some additional discussion and confirmation regarding the attached window study and proposed treatment for each is needed to confirm that the appropriate methodology will be used for each window. SAMPLE MOTIONS SAMPLE MOTION FOR APPROVAL: I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission approve the plans and specifications for alterations to the Emma Brown/Susan Winter House at 720 West Prospect as presented, finding that the proposed work XXXXX. SAMPLE MOTION FOR DENIAL: I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission deny the request for approval for the plans and specifications for alterations to the Emma Brown/Susan Winter House at 720 West Prospect as presented, finding that the proposed work XXXX. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Presentation 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Landmark designation ordinance 4. Landmark nomination form 5. Minutes Excerpt from April 2019 Conceptual Review Packet Pg. 57 720 W Prospect Design Review 1 Maren Bzdek, Sr. Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission, February 19, 2020 Location Map 2 1 2 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Updated 2-19-20 Packet Pg. 58 Emma Brown/Susan Winter House • Constructed 1935 • Designated Landmark: 2007 • Standard 2: Hobby Farm • Standard 3: Vernacular with Craftsman details • exposed rafters and purlins • 6/1 windows • multi-light front door & sidelights • raised concrete foundation • stucco exterior 3 Alterations • Picture window replaced band of three 6/1 double-hungs • Replacement windows on side and rear • Interior remodel (2008) • Rear screen porch demolished (after 2007) • Garage demolished (2017) 4 3 4 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Updated 2-19-20 Packet Pg. 59 Proposed Rehab Work 5 Building Alterations: • Patch and repair stucco in- kind • Replace asphalt roof with high-profile architectural asphalt shingle • Replace half-round gutters and downspouts • Rehab original 6/1 wood double-hung sash windows • Repair/paint existing wood barge rafters • Retain/repair original doors Proposed Rehab Work 6 Questions: • Potential replacement of 2 original hopper windows • Treatment of 7 non-original vinyl windows 5 6 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Updated 2-19-20 Packet Pg. 60 LPC Role Issue a certificate of appropriateness or deny the application for alterations to 720 W. Prospect, a designated Fort Collins Landmark 7 720 W Prospect Design Review 8 Maren Bzdek, Sr. Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission, February 19, 2020 7 8 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 1 Updated 2-19-20 Packet Pg. 61 Zϳ Zϭ tϭ tϲ Zϱ Zϰ Zϯ ZϮ Zϯ ϭϲ ϭϱ ϭϰ ϵ ϭϭ ϭϬ ϭϮ ϭϰ ϭϴ ϭϳ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϯ ϭϮ ϭϲ ϭϭ ϭϮ ϭϱ ϭϰ ϭϯ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϴ ϳ ϲ ϱ Ϯϭ ϭϲ tϮ Zϭ tϲ Zϰ Zϳ WZKWK^>Kd/KE K&dtK;ϮͿEt >dZ/DdZ^ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϭϭͬϮϯͬϮϬϭϵϴ͗Ϯϴ͗ϭϮWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ >sd/KE^ ϭϵϭϲ͘ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϭͬ25ͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϭ ϭϱ Ϯ ϭϲ ϭϯ ϭϮ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϰ Zϳ tϰ tϭ Zϭ Zϯ ZϮ Zϯ ZϮ Zϭ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭ ϮϬ ϭϵ ϭϯ ϲϭͬϮΗ ϭϰ ϭϮ ϭϯ Zϭ tϰ tϭ Zϰ Zϳ ZϮ Zϯ ZϮ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ ϱ ϰ ϯ Ϯ ϭ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϭϭͬϮϯͬϮϬϭϵϴ͗Ϯϴ͗ϭϳWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ >sd/KE^ ϭϵϭϲ͘ϯ :t ϭϭͬ25ͬϮϬϭϵ >WϮ UP UP UP DN DN UP ϭ ϭϰ ϭϵ ϭϴ ϭϳ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϵ ϭϯ ϭϮ ϭϭ ϭϬ ϴ ϳ ϲ ϱ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ;>KtͿ ;>KtͿ ;>KtͿ ;>KtͿ ϮϬ ;KsͿ;KsͿ Ϯϭ ;>KtͿ ZKKD ϭϬϯ ZKKD ϮϬϮ >/s/E'ͬ/E/E'ͬ</d,E ϭϬϮ >/s/E'ͬ/E/E'ͬ</d,E ϮϬϭ EdZz ϭϬϭ ϮϬϭ ϭϬϭ ϭϬϯ ϬϬϭ ϮϬϮ d, ϮϬϯ ϮΖͲϲΗ ϰΖͲϲΗ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϭϭͬϮϯͬϮϬϭϵϴ͗Ϯϴ͗ϭϴWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ W>E^ ϭϵϭϲ͘ϯ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϯ Ϯϭ ϭϮ ϭϵ EKEͲKZ/'/E> W/dhZt/EKt s/Ez>&ZD KZ/'/E> tE/E't/EKt tKK&ZDt/d,/s/>/d ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKKͬ^d>&ZDt/d,/s/>/d EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>ddtEϭϵϰϵEϭϵϲϴ W/dhZt/EKt tKK&ZD EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>dhE<EKtE Kh>Ͳ,hE't/EKt s/Ez>&ZD EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>dhE<EKtE Kh>Ͳ,hE't/EKt s/Ez>&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZDt/d, KZd/s/s/>/d KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD Et^dKZD^ZE^/E^d>>dydZ/KZ;hE<EKtEdͿ ϭϰ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϳ ϭϴ ϮϬ KZ/'/E> Kh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD Et^dKZD^ZE/E^d>>d ydZ/KZ;hE<EKtEKZ/'/EͿ KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKKͬ^d>&ZDt/d,/s/>/d KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKKͬ^d>&ZDt/d,/s/>/d KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϭ ϭϭ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϰ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϳ ϭϴ ϭϵ ϮϬ Ϯϭ ϮϬϭ K>,hd Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϭϭͬϮϯͬϮϬϭϵϴ͗Ϯϴ͗ϭϵWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ y/^d/E'W,KdK^ ϭϵϭϲ͘ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϭͬ25ͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϱ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'ϯ EK /^^h d ^d>sd/KE EKZd,>sd/KE t^d>sd/KE ^Khd,>sd/KE ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 66 ORDINANCE NO. 027, 2007 OF THE COUNCIL OF TI-IE CITY OF FORT COLLINS DESIGNATING THE EMMA BROWN/SUSAN WINTER HOUSE, 720 WEST PROSPECT ROAD, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, AS A FORT COLLINS LANDMARK PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 14 OF THE CODE OF TIIE CITY OF FORT COLLINS WHEREAS, pursuant to Section l+.2 of the City Code, the City Council has established a public policy encouraging the protection, enhancement and perpetuation of landmarks within the City; and WHEREAS, by Resolution dated January 10, 2007, the Landmark Preservation Commission (the "Commission") has determined that the Emma Brown/Susan Winter House has individual significance to Fort Collins wider landmark designation standards (l) and (3), for its ability to convey the Shields/Prospect District's historic use for ••gentleman farming," and for its architectural significance, as a very good example of vernacular architecture with craftsman elements; and WHEREAS, the Commission has further determined that said property meets the criteria of a landmark as set forth in Section 1 +.S of the Code and is eligible for designation as a landmark., and has recommended to the City Council that said property be designated by the City C.Ouncil as a landmark; and WHEREAS, the owner of the property has consented to such landmark designation; and WHEREAS, such landmark designation will preserve the propertys significance to the rommunity; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the recommendation of the Commission and desires to approve such recommendation and designate said property as a landmark. NOW, THEREFOREt BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That the property known as the Emma Brown/Susan Winter House and the adjacent lands upon which the historic building is located, but excluding the garage structure and the well, in the City of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado, described as follows, to wit: Beginning at a point 818.6 feet west of the southeast romer of the southwest quarter of Section 14 Township 7 North Range 69 West of the 6th Principle Meridian, thence North 550.2 feet to the south line of Lake Street, thence West 15 feet along the south line of Lake Street, thence South SS0.2 feet to the section line, thence East 7S feet to the true point of beginning, less that part which is located in C.Ollege Heights Subdivision and less Book 1159 Page 128, also known as 720 West Prospect Road ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 67 is hereby designated as a Fort Collins landmark pursuant to Chapter 14 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins. Section 2. That the Secretary of the Interior's standards and guidelines for the treatment of historic properties will serve as the standards by which alterations, additions and other changes to the building., and structures located upon the above described property will be reviewed for compliance with Chapter 14, Article lll, of the Code of the City of Fort Collins. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading. and ordered published this 6th day of February, A.D. 2007, and to be presented for final passage on day of February, A.O. 2007. ATIEST: ATTEST: City Clerk ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 68 Revised 09-2004 Page 1 Historic Landmark Designation Nomination Form DATE: May 1, 2006 LOCATION INFORMATION: Address: 720 West Prospect Road Legal Description: BEG AT PT 818.6 FT W OF SE COR OF SW 1/4 14-7-69, N 550.2 FT TO S LN LAKE ST, W 75 FT ALG S LN OF LAKE ST, S 550.2 FT TO S LN, E 75 FT TPOB, LESS PT IN COLLEGE HTS & LESS 1159-128 FTC Property Name: Emma Brown /Susan Winter House, Garage and Well OWNER INFORMATION: Name: Susan A. Winter Phone: 970-215-7355 Address: 720 West Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO 80526 CLASSIFICATION Category Ownership Status Present Use Existing Designation Building Public Occupied Commercial National Register Structure Private Unoccupied Educational State Register Site Religious Object Residential District Entertainment Government Other FORM PREPARED BY: Name and Title: Karen McWilliams, Preservation Planner Address: City of Fort Collins Advance Planning Department, P.O. Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Phone: 970-224-6078 Relationship to Owner: None Community Planning and Environmental Services Advance Planning Department Historic Preservation Office PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 970-221-6376 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 69 Revised 09-2004 Page 2 TYPE OF DESIGNATION and BOUNDARIES Individual Landmark Property Landmark District Explanation of Boundaries: The boundaries of the property being designated as a Fort Collins Landmark correspond to the legal description of the property, above. The property contains a historic residence, a historic garage, and a brick- lined well, all of which contribute to the property’s architectural and historical significance. SIGNIFICANCE Properties that possess exterior integrity are eligible for designation as Fort Collins Landmarks or Fort Collins Landmark Districts if they meet one (1) or more of the following standards for designation: Standard 1: The property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history; Standard 2: The property is associated with the lives of persons significant in history; Standard 3: The property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; Standard 4: The property has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The property at 720 W. Prospect Road provides an intact example of a Craftsman cottage and historic garage dating from the mid-1930s, surrounded by one-half acre of mature landscaping. The site further contains a brick-lined well, likely constructed c.1933, at about the time that the residence was built. The exterior integrity of both the residence and garage is very good, as both buildings convey all seven aspects of integrity: original location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. The same may be said of the well, a locally rare example of a once common historic resource. The 1949 Assessor’s records confirm that the home has changed little in the years since then. The property is eligible for individual designation under Standard 3 of the Landmark Preservation Code (Sec. 14-5), for its architectural significance. The property is also eligible for designation under Standard 1 of the Landmark Preservation Code (Sec. 14-5), as it conveys the area’s historic use as “gentleman farms.” This area, just south and west of the Colorado Agricultural College campus (now CSU), was occupied by hobby farms of generally one to two acres. These were owned by members of the Fort Collins community, many of them professionals, who wanted to enjoy both country life and the convenience of residing within minutes of the developed urban core of the town. Underscoring the property’s significance for its past use as a small gentleman farm, the records also show that in 1949 the property included a 1/8 share of water from the Arthur Ditch, and that it consisted of ½ acre of farmstead and ½ acre of pasture. A 20’ x 48’ poultry shed was located in the rear yard; it was demolished sometime prior to 1960. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 70 Revised 09-2004 Page 3 HISTORICAL INFORMATION Historic Significance – The property at 720 W. Prospect Road dates to circa 1933. It was developed at that time by Dr. Thaddeus Brown, an active local physician during the 1920s and 1930s, evidently as a home for his widowed mother. Brown maintained his own residence next door at 730 W. Prospect Road for many years. This property was listed with an address of 704 W. Prospect Road from approximately 1938 to 1962. Since that time, it has been listed as 720 W. Prospect Road. According to the Larimer County Assessor, the home that remains on the property today was constructed in 1933. No records were found to confirm this exact date. However, the home is known to have been developed prior to 1938 when it was occupied by Mrs. Emma J. Brown and Dr. Ross H. Brown, who appears to have been Mrs. Brown’s son. During the mid 1930s, the adjacent home to the west (730 W. Prospect Road, known as “Brownmar”) was owned and occupied by Dr. Thaddeus C. Brown. Dr. Brown was active in the Fort Collins medical community as a general practitioner throughout the 1920s and 1930s, and in 1923 was elected an officer of the Larimer County Medical Association. It appears that his mother, Emma, had been widowed by the 1930s and required a home of her own. Sometime between 1933 and 1938, Dr. Brown constructed the residence at 720 W. Prospect Road for his mother. By 1940, following the Brown’s ownership, the property was occupied over the next several decades by three successive families who were employed in the downtown retail and banking businesses. The first residents following the Browns were Jacques Gato and his wife, Dorothy. Jacques was the manager of Mode-O-Day, a women’s clothing store in downtown Fort Collins. In 1948 and 1949, the house was owned and occupied by John C. and Ethel H. Turner, about whom nothing was found. From around 1952 to 1971, William Clark Springer and his wife Maude lived in the home. William worked as a teller at First National Bank from 1952 to 1960. He was then retired from 1962 to 1969, but returned to work as an employee at Al’s News Stand in downtown Fort Collins in 1970 and 1971. Records obtained from the Larimer County Assessor’s office from 1949 and 1968 (parcel #97140- 00-009) show that the house and garage at 720 W. Prospect Road have changed little since those years. The only obvious change is that the opening now occupied by the front picture window was originally filled by a band of three 6/1 double hung sash windows. These matched the band of windows still found on the main body of the house a little further to the west. On the rear of the home, the screened porch appears to have been constructed by the mid-1960s. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 71 Revised 09-2004 Page 4 ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION Construction Date: 1933 (est.) Architect/Builder: Unknown Building Materials: Stucco over frame Architectural Style: Craftsman Description: The house at 720 W. Prospect Road exhibits elements of the Craftsman style of architecture. This is most evident in the building’s exposed rafters and purlins, its 6/1 double hung sash windows, and its multi-light front entry door. The residence is a one-story, side-gabled, wood frame rectangular building that faces toward the south, overlooking a front yard and Prospect Road. Covering the exterior walls is stucco, which appears to have been applied many decades ago. The building, measuring approximately 32’ x 34’, rests upon a raised concrete foundation. The side-gabled roof is finished with asphalt shingles and the perimeters exhibit exposed rafter ends, exposed purlins, and early gutters and downspouts. Two chimneys are present along the ridge line, both constructed of brick and finished with stucco. The main entry is approached by way of a flagstone patio in front of the home. Three concrete steps rise to the west-facing door, with a wrought iron handrail also rising along the south edge of the stairway. The entry consists of the original 15-light wood door with flanking 10-light sidelights. An old wood storm door with 8 lights is also present. Other original features include a wood threshold, wood surrounds, and all of the early hardware. The windows on the home mostly consist of 6/1 double hung sash windows with their original wood frames and surrounds. One 9/1 double hung sash window is also found on the facade, along with a large picture window with a metal awning. The basement contains 3-light and 6-light hoppers. In several locations, the original windows have been replaced with modern aluminum 9/1 double hung windows. All of the original wood surrounds remain in place. Due to their locations, the modern windows cannot be seen from the street or the front of the house. Projecting from the rear of the home is a screened porch consisting of 2” x 4” open framework walls and a shed roof finished with opaque corrugated plastic sheeting. This porch appears to have been on the home for a number of decades. A door enters the rear of the residence near its northwest corner. In this secondary entrance is an original wood panel door with one light over three panels. Behind the house to the northwest is the original 14’ x 24’ garage. This rectangular wood frame building has a concrete floor, stuccoed walls, and gabled roof with asphalt shingles. Facing toward the unpaved driveway to the south is a pair of large wood swinging doors with six lights over three vertical panels. A secondary entrance found on the east elevation of the building contains an old panel door. Projecting from the north wall of the building is an early shed-roof addition accessed through a panel door and containing one 6-light fixed window. Surrounding the home and garage, which are located on one acre of land, are front and rear yard areas planted with mature trees and landscaping. The rear yard is particularly large, and the size of the lot is indicative of the property historic use as a gentleman farm during its earlier years. ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 72 Revised 09-2004 Page 5 REFERENCE LIST or SOURCES of INFORMATION Winter, Susan. Personal conversation with Karen McWilliams, 2/06 Fort Collins City Directories, 1902 -1999. Fort Collins Public Library, Local History Archive Image Database. Fort Collins Public Library, Local History Archive: various records, including Building Records and Building Permits. Larimer County Assessor’s Office, Residential Property Information Sladek, Ron. Historic Building Analysis Report: 720 west Prospect Road. Tatanka Historical Associates, Inc., May 1, 2006. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date Determined “Eligible” __________________________________________________ Ordinance # ______________________________________________________________ Application within last 12 months? Yes No Date Recorded ____________________________________________________________ ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 73 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 74 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 75 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 76 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 77 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 78 ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 79 EXCERPT City of Fort Collins Page 1 April 17, 2019 Meg Dunn, Chair City Council Chambers Alexandra Wallace, Co-Vice Chair City Hall West Kristin Gensmer, Co-Vice Chair 300 Laporte Avenue Michael Bello Fort Collins, Colorado Mollie Bredehoft Katie Dorn Kevin Murray Anne Nelsen Anna Simpkins The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. Video of the meeting will be broadcast at 1:30 p.m. the following day through the Comcast cable system on Channel 14 or 881 (HD). Please visit http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/ for the daily cable schedule. The video will also be available for later viewing on demand here: http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php. Regular Meeting April 17, 2019 Minutes- Excerpt for Haven Apts. Design Review • CALL TO ORDER Chair Dunn called the meeting to order at 5:33 p.m. • ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dunn, Wallace, Bello, Bredehoft, Dorn, Gensmer, Nelsen, Simpkins ABSENT: Murray STAFF: McWilliams, Bzdek, Bumgarner, Van Hall, Schiager ***BEGIN EXCERPT*** 4. 720 W PROSPECT (EMMA BROWN/SUSAN WINTER HOUSE) – CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitation work on the windows, stucco, chimney, wood fascia; a replacement asphalt roof at the designated landmark at 720 W Prospect. APPLICANT: Ian Schuff, alm2s; CSU Research Foundation (CSURF) Landmark Preservation Commission Packet Pg. 80 EXCERPT City of Fort Collins Page 2 April 17, 2019 Staff Report Ms. Bzdek provided an explanation of the two separate agenda items for this property. She discussed the property noting it was designated in 2007 in anticipation of the development being considered. She discussed alterations made to the property over time. Ms. Bzdek stated the design review is focused on the exterior changes to the building at 720 West Prospect. The changes are essentially rehabilitation oriented in nature with the intent to shore up any necessary repairs and get the building in shape for adaptive reuse. Changes include rehabilitating the original windows still on the property, repairing original doors and wood facia, replacing the roof, and repairing chimneys as necessary. Applicant Presentation Mr. Schuff, applicant, noted he was serving on the Commission when the property was designated. He discussed surrounding projects and structures. Regarding the adaptive reuse plan, Mr. Shuff stated there are minimal effects to the exterior of the home. He detailed the proposed changes and stated the canopy over the picture window may be eliminated. Public Input None Commission Questions and Discussion Ms. Simpkins asked if any modifications will need to be made for accessibility. Mr. Shuff replied all accessibility will be addressed in the new apartment building as this is part of an overall development project. Chair Dunn asked if there is a basement. Mr. Shuff replied in the affirmative and stated it will likely be used for storage and mechanical uses. Mr. Bello asked about the stairs to the basement. Mr. Shuff replied that will be retained. Ms. Gensmer asked about the age of the canopy above the picture window. Mr. Shuff estimated it is likely from the 1960's. Ms. Bzdek agreed and stated the Commission could examine it as an historic feature that has taken on its own historic significance. Chair Dunn commented she does not believe the canopy is historically important, but stated she would leave it in place. Ms. Bredehoft stated she does not believe standard 2 is applicable given the loss of a connection between 720 and 730. Mr. Shuff discussed the placement of the new building on the less predominant side of the historic structure. Mr. Bello asked if the space between the two structures is historic and needs to be maintained. Mr. Shuff replied the side and front yards are the most important parts of the spatial relationship between the buildings and surrounding context. He stated they are trying to minimize impacts from a site design standpoint. Chair Dunn asked if there are any plants that hint at the original hobby farm nature of the site. Craig Russell, land planner, replied he has not seen any historic photos that indicate a farm setting. He stated the large spruce trees were likely placed as screening for the residences and discussed the desire for a residential quality and feel with preserving the existing conifers. Chair Dunn stated the property was landmarked for its architecture and hobby farm character and she suggested selecting plantings that would fit with that character. Ms. Bredehoft asked about the current versus proposed driveway width. Mr. Russell replied the proposal is for a 22 to 24-foot driveway and the existing drive is gravel and probably 15-feet wide. Ms. Bredehoft expressed concern the buildings do not feel connected with the drive and tree line. Mr. Russell replied the walkways will connect and the landscaping should help with the connection. Mr. Bello asked if the drive could be located to the west of the 3-story building. Mr. Russell replied that is an existing emergency access. Packet Pg. 81 EXCERPT City of Fort Collins Page 3 April 17, 2019 Mr. Shuff noted the project will require two points of access; therefore, the drive off Prospect will need to be maintained. Chair Dunn asked if having a one-way through drive using both drives would be possible, allowing for a narrower drive on the Prospect end. Mr. Shuff replied the easement drive that goes to Lake does not allow vehicular access; it is primarily a pedestrian access point to CSU. Ms. Bredehoft asked about the character of the low seat walls. Mr. Russell replied the detention wall already exists and is screened with shrubs; however, the low seat walls have yet to be designed and he is open to suggestions. Ms. Bredehoft asked about the finished floor elevations for the two historic buildings versus the new building. Mr. Shuff replied the historic buildings are probably three or four stair risers up and the proposed building will likely not come out of the ground too far due to accessibility. Ms. Dorn asked about the dimension of the grass between 720 and the gathering place to the north. Mr. Russell replied it will be about six to seven feet wide with plants to anchor the foundation. Mr. Shuff asked if the Commission would like to see a more visually open space. Commission members discussed options for landscaping and hardscaping. Commission members discussed the previously-approved plans and Ms. Bzdek referenced a summary of the Commission's issues when the property was designated noting a similar discussion was held regarding problems and constraints. Chair Dunn stated she would like to focus on what is physically happening to 720 then move on to the other presentation. She requested input about masonry, mortar analysis, and shingles in terms of maintaining distinctive materials, features, finishes, construction techniques and treatments. Ms. Dorn asked if the Design Assistance Program will be used for the window study and mortar analysis. Mr. Shuff replied they would be happy to use that resource and stated this structure mostly needs the window study and potentially some work on dry rot on the facia. Ms. Nelsen discussed the importance of preserving the historic character of the building knowing it was landmarked with the idea of a larger building being part of the project. Chair Dunn stated the Commission is comfortable having staff address the windows and stucco. She requested materials samples prior to final review. ***END EXCERPT*** Packet Pg. 82 720 W. Prospect Haven Apartments Landmark Preservation Commission February 19 th 2020 LPC Meeting ITEM 4, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 82-1 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Conditions 720 W. Prospect South Elevation West Elevation ITEM 4, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 82-2 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Conditions 720 W. Prospect North Elevation East Elevation ITEM 4, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 82-3 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Conditions 720 W. Prospect West main entry door Vinyl window at east elevation North door Basement window ITEM 4, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 82-4 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Conditions 720 W. Prospect Area of stucco delamination on east elevation Vinyl singe hung windows on north elevation – smaller slider window was infilled previously ITEM 4, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 82-5 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Floor Plan 720 W. Prospect ITEM 4, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 82-6 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Proposed Floor Plan 720 W. Prospect ITEM 4, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 82-7 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing and Proposed Elevations 720 W. Prospect ITEM 4, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 82-8 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing and Proposed Elevations 720 W. Prospect ITEM 4, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 82-9 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Location of Non-original Windows 720 W. Prospect ITEM 4, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 82-10 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Location of Non-original Windows 720 W. Prospect ITEM 4, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 82-11 Agenda Item 5 Item 5, Page 1 STAFF REPORT February 19, 2020 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME APEX - HAVEN APARTMENTS (PDP190017) – DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF Maren Bzdek, Senior Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitation work on the windows, stucco, chimney, wood fascia; a replacement asphalt roof; and the construction of a new three-story apartment building behind the designated landmark at 720 W Prospect and the abutting residence at 730 W Prospect. APPLICANT: Ian Schuff, alm2s; CSU Research Foundation (CSURF) LPC’S ROLE: At this meeting, the Landmark Preservation Commission will provide a recommendation to the decision maker (Planning & Zone Board) regarding this project’s compliance with the standards in Fort Collins Land Use Code section 3.4.7. BACKGROUND: This application received a conceptual review from the Landmark Preservation Commission in April 2019. In the interim, the design of Building 1 (the three-story building) and the site plan have been updated to reflect staff comments from the first round of development review. PROPOSED WORK: • Construction of three-story apartment building behind the one-story residences (see detailed drawings and summary of proposed work in applicant presentation) • Exterior rehabilitation of historic residence, including window opening alterations to meet egress requirements (see detailed drawings and summary of proposed work in applicant presentation) AREA OF ADJACENCY SUMMARY: The area of adjacency is the area, the outer boundary of which is 200 hundred feet in all directions from the perimeter of the development site. Any lot or parcel of property is within the area of adjacency if any portion of the lot or parcel is within the 200-foot outer boundary. According to the requirements in 3.4.7(B), staff has identified the following historic resources that meet the above requirement and shall be used for the establishment of the Historic Influence Area, to which the standards in 3.4.7(E) apply. Packet Pg. 83 Updated 2-19-20 Agenda Item 5 Item 5, Page 2 • Historic Resources on the Development Site, Abutting, or Across a Side Alley: • Emma Brown/Susan Winter House: 720 W Prospect; designated as a Fort Collins landmark in 2007 (on development site) • 720 W Prospect: eligible for landmark designation (on development site) • Historic Influence Area: According to 3.4.7(B)(2)(f), the historic influence area for any historic resource located on the development site is the entire development site. See attached map for reference. REVIEW CRITERIA AND STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT: Land Use Code (LUC) Section 3.4.7, Historic and Cultural Resources contains the applicable standards for new buildings, where designated or eligible historic landmarks or historic districts are part of the development site or surrounding neighborhood context. 3.4.7(D): Treatment of Historic Resources on Development Sites – Design Review of 730 W Prospect (“Brownmar,” 1903 Bungalow) DESIGNATED RESOURCES Background: Section 3.4.7(D) of the Land Use Code requires a separate Design Review process for designated historic resources on the development site. Designated Resources on the Development Site: 720 W Prospect (Emma Brown/Susan Winter House) Design Review of proposed changes to this Fort Collins Landmark is a separate agenda item coming before LPC at this meeting. Certificate of Appropriateness: Decision pending. Chapter 14, Article III requirements and staff findings: Staff finds that the conceptual details provided indicate that the applicant has created an adaptive reuse plan for the historic buildings on the development site that has the potential to meet all of the applicable Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. ELIGIBLE RESOURCES Background: Land Use Code Section 3.4.7(D)(3) requires that, “to the maximum extent feasible, the development plan and building design shall provide for the preservation and adaptive use pursuant to the Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties” of historic resources that are eligible for Fort Collins landmark designation. The evaluation of compliance with this standard is part of the development review process and is included in the recommendation to the decision maker for development applications. Eligible Resources on the Development Site: 730 W Prospect This 1903 craftsman bungalow residence is a rectangular, two story, frame structure with an asphalt shingle, side gabled roof. Roof features include overhanging eaves, exposed rafter ends, and a large, shed roof, wall dormer with side walls, knee braces at either end, and six three-over-one (three vertical lights over a single pane), double- hung windows. It has a concrete foundation and stucco exterior over wood siding. The main (south) façade is broken into three bays and contains a central entrance. The single story, full-width porch has three large, square support columns and four concrete steps leading to an 18-light door with six-light sidelights. Fenestration is two sets of three windows, each one six-over-six double-hung. Windows on other elevations are either single, pairs, or sets of three nine-light casement with simple wooden surrounds. A central rear entrance has three concrete steps with a concrete stoop extension to the west end of the north elevation. There is another, smaller shed roof wall dormer on the rear elevation with side walls and a pair of double-hung windows. The brick chimney is located centrally on the southern slope. There was a detached garage on the lot that was demolished in 2017. Packet Pg. 84 Updated 2-19-20 Agenda Item 5 Item 5, Page 3 Proposed Work: “Brownmar,” 730 W Prospect • Paint existing stucco finish • Rehabilitation of existing wood door and sidelites • New high-profile architectural asphalt shingles • Remove existing gutters; replace with new galvanized half-round gutters, installed at existing exposed 2x6 rafter tails at the existing roof eaves • Rehabilitation of the existing 2x8 wood barge rafter and rafter tails • Reconstruct existing brick chimney, using existing bricks with approved mortar analysis • Add new door and entry landing at site of existing window on east (side) elevation • Remove concrete stoop and non-historic door on north (rear) elevation; fill in door opening • Remove one window on north (rear) elevation to replace with an egress window Evaluation of Applicable Review Criteria Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis (730 W Prospect) Standard Met (Y/N) SOI #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Some of the proposed exterior alterations on the historic residence at 730 W. Prospect meet this standard because the work allows for adaptive reuse of the structure through simple repair and rehabilitation of the existing historic features (e.g. windows) and materials (e.g. stucco). The Commission will need to discuss whether the alterations to the north and east elevations will impact the historic integrity is needed in order to make a final determination regarding compliance with this standard. TBD SOI #10 New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Related new construction on this site, if removed in the future, would not impair the essential form and integrity of the historic property beyond the impairments to the site and context that already today. Yes SOI #5 Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. The Commission will need to discuss whether the alterations to the north and east elevation will impact the historic integrity is needed in order to make a final determination regarding compliance with this standard. TBD Packet Pg. 85 Updated 2-19-20 Agenda Item 5 Item 5, Page 4 SOI #6 Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. The proposed exterior alterations to three of the four elevations on the historic residence at 730 W Prospect appears to meet this standard because all of the proposed work allows preserves and rehabilitates the existing historic features and materials. The Commission will need to discuss whether the alterations to the north and east elevation will impact the historic integrity is needed in order to make a final determination regarding compliance with this standard. TBD SOI #7 Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. Detailed methodology for repair work to masonry, fascia, and windows appears to meet this standard. Yes SOI #1 A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. The proposal meets this standard because it includes adaptive reuse of the residence at 730 W Prospect as additional dwelling units while requiring only minimal rehabilitation and repairs to the exterior historic materials and features. Yes SOI #4 Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. There are no identified changes to this residence that have acquired their own historic significance. Yes SOI #3 Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. The alterations on the north and east elevation will need to be evaluated carefully in order to determine if this standard can be met. TBD SOI #2 The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. The recent construction of large apartment buildings on Prospect and Lake Streets have dramatically altered the historic setting of 730 W Prospect. The addition of a large, three-story apartment building immediately behind the historic residences at 720 and 730 W Prospect further alters the setting, which was rural/semi-rural in character at the time of construction and through most of its history. However, staff feels this standard is no longer applicable because the N/A Packet Pg. 86 Updated 2-19-20 Agenda Item 5 Item 5, Page 5 historic setting and character are already lost. This proposal does retain the existing mature landscaping in front of the residences and the original driveway entrance off of Prospect, which helps to preserve what historic character does remain. The scale of the three-story apartment building also provides a more gradual transition to the much larger developments to the north and west. SOI #8 Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. N/A 3.4.7(E)(1): Design Requirements for a Proposed Development Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Standard Met (Y/N) Massing and Building Articulation 1. New construction shall be similar in width or, if larger, be articulated into massing reflective of the mass and scale of historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley. The design of the apartment building includes a modularity that references the width of the two historic residential buildings. Yes Massing and Building Articulation 2. In all zone districts, stepbacks must be located on new buildings to create gradual massing transitions at the same height or one story above the height of historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley. Additionally, in the Downtown zone district, the widest portions of stepbacks required in the Downtown zone district stepback standard shall be on building portions closest to historic resources. The southeast portion of the building closest to the one-story historic structure (720 W Prospect) includes an appropriate stepback at the second story, and the southwest portion of the building closest to the two-story historic structure (730 W Prospect) also has a two-story component on the west end of the building. Yes Building Materials 3. The lower story facades until any stepback (required or otherwise) must be constructed of authentic, durable, high quality materials (brick, stone, glass, terra cotta, stucco (non EVIS), precast concrete, wood, cast iron, architectural metal) installed to industry standards. More information about the type and quantity of cladding materials is needed to complete the evaluation of this standard. TBD Packet Pg. 87 Updated 2-19-20 Agenda Item 5 Item 5, Page 6 Building Materials 4. New construction shall reference one or more of the predominate material(s) on historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley, by using at least two of the following to select the primary material(s) for any one to three story building on the lower story facades until any stepbacks (required or otherwise): 1) type; 2) scale; 3) color; 4) three-dimensionality; 5) pattern. The applicant has emphasized the use of stucco on the south façade of the apartment building in recognition of this standard, as both historic residences are clad in stucco. The Commission should discuss the placement and quantity of stucco in reference to this standard. TBD Façade Details 5. Use at least one of the following: 1) similar window pattern; 2) similar window proportion of height to width; 3) similar solid-to-void pattern as found on historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley. The proposed design appears to meet this requirement in all three areas: similar pattern, proportion, and solid-to-void pattern for the majority of windows. Yes Façade Details 6. Use select horizontal or vertical reference lines or elements (such as rooflines, cornices, and bell courses) to relate the new construction to historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley. The rooflines of the proposed apartment structure are drawn from the historic buildings as a reference. Yes Visibility of Historic Features New construction shall not cover or obscure character-defining architectural elements, such as windows or primary design features of historic resources on the development site, abutting, or across a side alley. The separation between the new construction and the historic buildings and the placement of new construction to the rear should be evaluated to determine if this standard is met. TBD 3.4.7(E)(3): Plan of Protection A plan of protection that outlines how historic resources will be protected during the process of rehabilitation and new construction on the site is required prior to the Landmark Preservation Commission providing a recommendation to the decision maker regarding a development project. The applicant has not yet submitted this document for review and approval. Packet Pg. 88 Updated 2-19-20 Agenda Item 5 Item 5, Page 7 SAMPLE MOTION: The Commission may propose a motion for a recommendation of approval or denial of the proposal based on the following suggested outline: “I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to the Decision Maker [approval/denial] of the development proposal for Haven Apartments, finding it [is/is not] in compliance with the standards contained in Land Use Code section 3.4.7 for the following reasons: • The project [meets/does not meet] the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. • The project [design reflects/does not reflect] massing, building materials, and façade details that are compatible with the historic context, [creates/does not create] a visual relationship between the historic architecture and the new construction, and [meets/does not meet] the requirements outlined in Table 1 of Section 3.4.7. • The proposed design [protects/does not protect] the visibility of nearby historic resources. Note: The Commission may elaborate on these basic findings, propose additional findings, or remove any of these proposed findings according to its evaluation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Presentation 2. Haven Apartments – Building 1 – LPC Submittal 3. Haven Apartments – Building 2 – LPC Submittal 4. April 17, 2019 Minutes Excerpt Packet Pg. 89 Updated 2-19-20 Apex-Haven Apartments: Development Review 1 Maren Bzdek, Sr. Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission, February 19, 2020 Area of Adjacency 2 1 2 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Updated 2-19-20 Packet Pg. 90 720 W Prospect: Emma Brown/Susan Winter House (Fort Collins Landmark) 3 730 W Prospect: “Brownmar” (1903, eligible historic resource) Historic Resources Proposed Site Alterations: Revised 4 Apex-Haven Apartments: • Combine Apex Apartments (Lot 1) with Lot 2 to east • Construct 3-story, 50-unit multi-family building behind historic residences (Lot 1) • Primary access from W. Prospect • Other landscape/site alterations: parking, detention, dog park, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, screening 3 4 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Updated 2-19-20 Packet Pg. 91 April 2019 Conceptual Review 5 6 Landmark Preservation Commission, December 18, 2019 April 2019 Conceptual Review 5 6 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Updated 2-19-20 Packet Pg. 92 Staff Comments 7 Design Compatibility: Current proposed design appears to meet 4 of the 6 design standards (3.4.7 Table 1). Building Materials Standards 3 and 4 require further discussion, in particular Proposed Alterations: 730 W Prospect 8 3.4.7 (D)(3) – Eligible Resources on Site 7 8 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Updated 2-19-20 Packet Pg. 93 Proposed Alterations: 730 W Prospect 9 3.4.7 (D)(3) – Eligible Resources on Site Apex-Haven Apartments: Development Review 10 Maren Bzdek, Sr. Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission, February 19, 2020 9 10 ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 1 Updated 2-19-20 Packet Pg. 94 Existing emergency access & pedestrian and bike connection to Lake Street Existing detention Detention Gathering Plaza Existing boundary trees Fenced dog pocket park Trash Right-in / right-out Building 3: Existing house Building 2: Existing house Existing Apex Apartments LAND USE INFORMATION LEGEND HAVEN BUILDINGS Building 1 (3-stories): 50 units Studio: 38 1 bedroom: 12 Building 2 (2-stories): 2 units 2 bedroom: 1 3 bedroom: 1 Building 3 (1-story): 2 units 1 bedroom: 2 APEX BUILDING Existing Building: 61 units Studio: 33 1 bedroom: 28 REQUIRED PARKING (TOD) 1 bedroom or less: (0.75 x 111 = 83.25 spaces) 2 bedroom: (1 x 1 = 1 space) 3 bedroom: (1.25 x 1 = 1.25 space) Total required = 86 spaces PROVIDED PARKING Existing Apex lot: 86 spaces Haven lot: 9 spaces Total provided = 95 spaces REQUIRED BIKE PARKING 1 per bedroom (60% enclosed, 40% ğ[HG ^dhK^z^dDͲ ^tϮϴϰϬ ,DDZ^/>sZ Z/<sEZ EhdD'Ͳ ^DKKd, >W^//E'Ͳ ^tϮϴϰϵ t^d,^dZ'Zz ^W,>d^,/E'>^Ͳ Z/&dtKK &^/͕dZ/DͲ ^tϳϲϱϯ ^/>sZWK/Ed s/Ez>t/EKt^E KKZ^ ^dhK^z^dDͲ ^tϮϴϰϬ ,DDZ^/>sZ Z/<sEZ EhdD'Ͳ ^DKKd, >W^//E'Ͳ ^tϮϴϰϵ t^d,^dZ'Zz ^W,>d^,/E'>^Ͳ Z/&dtKK &^/͕dZ/DͲ ^tϳϲϱϯ ^/>sZWK/Ed s/Ez>t/EKt^E KKZ^ ^dhK^z^dDͲ ^tϮϴϰϬ ,DDZ^/>sZ Z/<sEZ EhdD'Ͳ ^DKKd, >W^//E'Ͳ ^tϮϴϰϵ t^d,^dZ'Zz ^W,>d^,/E'>^Ͳ Z/&dtKK &^/͕dZ/DͲ ^tϳϲϱϯ ^/>sZWK/Ed s/Ez>t/EKt^E KKZ^ DdZ/>>'E >W^//E' &/ZDEd ^tϮϴϰϵͲ t^d,^dZ'Zz ^dhK ^tϮϴϰϬͲ ,DDZ^/>sZ dZ/D &/ZDEd ^tϳϲϱϯͲ ^/>sZWK/Ed Z/< ^hDD/dZ/<KDWEz EhdD'Ͳ ^DKKd, ZKK&/E' ^W,>d^,/E'> ^dd'Zz Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ^dhK^z^dDͲ ^tϮϴϰϬ ,DDZ^/>sZ Z/<sEZ EhdD'Ͳ ^DKKd, >W^//E'Ͳ ^tϮϴϰϵ t^d,^dZ'Zz ^W,>d^,/E'>^Ͳ Z/&dtKK &^/͕dZ/DͲ ^tϳϲϱϯ ^/>sZWK/Ed s/Ez>t/EKt^E KKZ^ ^dhK^z^dDͲ ^tϮϴϰϬ ,DDZ^/>sZ Z/<sEZ EhdD'Ͳ ^DKKd, >W^//E'Ͳ ^tϮϴϰϵ t^d,^dZ'Zz ^W,>d^,/E'>^Ͳ Z/&dtKK &^/͕dZ/DͲ ^tϳϲϱϯ ^/>sZWK/Ed s/Ez>t/EKt^EKKZ^ ^dhK^z^dDͲ ^tϮϴϰϬ ,DDZ^/>sZ Z/<sEZ EhdD'Ͳ ^DKKd, >W^//E'Ͳ ^tϮϴϰϵ t^d,^dZ'Zz ^W,>d^,/E'>^Ͳ Z/&dtKK &^/͕dZ/DͲ ^tϳϲϱϯ ^/>sZWK/Ed s/Ez>t/EKt^E KKZ^ DdZ/>>'E >W^//E' &/ZDEd ^tϮϴϰϵͲ t^d,^dZ'Zz ^dhK ^tϮϴϰϬͲ ,DDZ^/>sZ dZ/D &/ZDEd ^tϳϲϱϯͲ ^/>sZWK/Ed Z/< ^hDD/dZ/<KDWEz EhdD'Ͳ ^DKKd, ZKK&/E' ^W,>d^,/E'> ^dd'Zz Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϮϬ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϯͬϮϬϮϬϰ͗ϭϮ͗ϱϯWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ ϯs/t^ ϭϵϭϲ /^ ϮϬϮϬͬϬϮͬϬϯ sϬϭ Dy/DKs>KWDEd &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^ EK /^^h d ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 98 WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϮϬ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϯͬϮϬϮϬϰ͗ϬϬ͗ϮϰWD ϭϳϯϬͲ ^hZ&ϳϮϬ ϯs/t^ ϭϵϭϲ͘ϭ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϮϬϮϬͬϬϮͬϬϯ sϬϭ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^ sϬϭ ^>͗ ϭϮΗсϭΖͲϬΗ ϭ ZEZϭͲ &ZKDWZK^Wd>KK</E'EKZd,^d sϬϭ ^>͗ ϭϮΗсϭΖͲϬΗ Ϯ ZEZϮͲ &ZKDWZK^Wd>KK</E'EKZd,t^d EK /^^h d ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 99 Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϮϬ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϯͬϮϬϮϬϰ͗ϬϬ͗ϮϰWD ϭϳϯϬͲ ^hZ&ϳϮϬ ϯs/t^ ϭϵϭϲ͘ϭ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϮϬϮϬͬϬϮͬϬϯ sϬϮ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^ sϬϮ ^>͗ ϭϮΗсϭΖͲϬΗ ϭ ZEZϯͲ >KK</E'^Khd,t^d sϬϮ ^>͗ ϭϮΗсϭΖͲϬΗ Ϯ ZEZϰͲ &ZKDt^d>KK</E'^d EK /^^h d ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 100 ϭϱ Ϯ ϭϮ Zϲ Zϭ Zϰ Zϱ ZϮ tϰ tϰ ϭϮ ϰ ϯ ϭϰ Ϯ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϭ ϲ Zϰ tϱ tϱ tϱ tϭ Zϲ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϭϭͬϮϮͬϮϬϭϵϭϭ͗Ϭϲ͗ϰϴD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ >sd/KE^ ϭϵϭϲ͘Ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϭͬ25ͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϭ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'Ϯ EK /^^h d >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ ϭ y/^d/E'^Khd,>sd/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ Ϯ WZKWK^^Khd,>sd/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ ϯ y/^d/E'^d>sd/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ ϰ WZKWK^^d>sd/KE ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ Ϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐůĂďŽŶŐƌĂĚĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ ϭϱ ϭϮ ϰ ϱ ϯ ϭϮ Ϯ ϯ ϭϮ ϭϱ Zϲ Zϲ tϱ Zϰ Zϱ Zϭ ZϮ tϱ tϮ tϮ tϭ tϯ tϭ tϱ Zϰ ZϮ Zϲ tϭ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϭϭͬϮϮͬϮϬϭϵϭϭ͗Ϭϳ͗ϬϲD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ >sd/KE^ ϭϵϭϲ͘Ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϭͬ25ͬϮϬϭϵ >WϮ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'Ϯ EK /^^h d >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ ϭ y/^d/E'EKZd,>sd/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ Ϯ y/^d/E't^d>sd/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ ϯ WZKWK^EKZd,>sd/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ ϰ WZKWK^t^d>sd/KE ϯ Ϯ ϰ ϱ ϰ Ϯ Ϯ ϯ ϭϬ ϭϵ ϳ ϵ ϳ ϴ ϴ ϳ ϳ ϵ ϵ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϵ ϵ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϭϭͬϮϮͬϮϬϭϵϭϭ͗Ϭϳ͗ϬϴD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ WZKWK^ &/Z^d>s>>dZd/KE^ ϭϵϭϲ͘Ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϭͬ25ͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϯ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'Ϯ EK /^^h d ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ WZKWK^&/Z^d>s>&>KKZW>E ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ WZKWK^&/Z^d>s>DK>/d/KEW>E ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ Ϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐůĂďŽŶŐƌĂĚĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ ϳ ϵ ϵ ϭϳ ϵ ϵ ϳ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϴ ϳ ϰ ϵ ϳ ϵ ϭϬ ϳ ϭϮ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϵ ϴ ϴ ϭϮ ϭϰ ϭϮ ϰ ϳ ϳ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϭϮΖͲϲΗ ϭϮΖͲϲΗ ϭϭΖͲϮϭͬϰΗ ϰΗ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϭϭͬϮϮͬϮϬϭϵϭϭ͗Ϭϳ͗ϬϵD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ WZKWK^ ^KE>s> >dZd/KE^ ϭϵϭϲ͘Ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϰ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϳ ϭϴ ϭϵ ϮϬ Ϯϭ ϮϮ Ϯϯ Ϯϰ KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿ>/d,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿ>/d,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿ>/dW/dhZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿ>/dW/dhZt/EKt tKK&ZD EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>dhE<EKtE W/dhZt/EKtt/d,Kh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^d/d,Z^/ tKKͬs/Ez>&ZD KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> W/dhZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϰ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϳ ϮϬ Ϯϭ ϮϮ Ϯϰ Ϯϱ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ Ϯϴ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϭϭͬϮϮͬϮϬϭϵϭϭ͗Ϭϳ͗ϭϱD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ y/^d/E' W,KdK^ ϭϵϭϲ͘Ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϭͬ25ͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϲ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'Ϯ EK /^^h d y/^d/E't^d>sd/KE y/^d/E'EKZd,>sd/KE y/^d/E'^d>sd/KE y/^d/E'^Khd,>sd/KE ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 106 EXCERPT City of Fort Collins Page 1 April 17, 2019 Meg Dunn, Chair City Council Chambers Alexandra Wallace, Co-Vice Chair City Hall West Kristin Gensmer, Co-Vice Chair 300 Laporte Avenue Michael Bello Fort Collins, Colorado Mollie Bredehoft Katie Dorn Kevin Murray Anne Nelsen Anna Simpkins The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. Video of the meeting will be broadcast at 1:30 p.m. the following day through the Comcast cable system on Channel 14 or 881 (HD). Please visit http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/ for the daily cable schedule. The video will also be available for later viewing on demand here: http://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php. Regular Meeting April 17, 2019 Minutes - Excerpt - Haven Apts. Development Review • CALL TO ORDER Chair Dunn called the meeting to order at 5:33 p.m. • ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dunn, Wallace, Bello, Bredehoft, Dorn, Gensmer, Nelsen, Simpkins ABSENT: Murray STAFF: McWilliams, Bzdek, Bumgarner, Van Hall, Schiager ***BEGIN EXCERPT*** 5. 720/730 PROSPECT APARTMENTS – CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DESCRIPTION: Construction of a new three-story apartment building behind the designated landmark at 720 W Prospect and the abutting residence at 730 W Prospect. APPLICANT: Ian Schuff, alm2s; CSU Research Foundation (CSURF) Landmark Preservation Commission ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 107 EXCERPT City of Fort Collins Page 2 April 17, 2019 Staff Report Ms. Bzdek stated this item allows the Commission to provide conceptual comments while considering Section 3.4.7 and the Secretary of the Interior standards. She discussed the area of adjacency which includes 720 and 730 and noted the historic influence area is the part of the development that must comply with the design compatibility standards. In this case, that is the entire development site. Ms. Bzdek provided a history of the 730 W. Prospect home and detailed the Commission's role Applicant Presentation – Part 1 Mr. Schuff showed photos of the 730 home stating its stucco has very little deterioration and the wood windows are well intact. He stated he would like to relocate the entry on the back side of the house and noted the chimney is falling apart which will require a mortar analysis and reconstruction. He stated the home will be a triplex and the interior stairs will be preserved. Public Input None Commission Questions and Discussion – Part 1 Chair Dunn requested input on the proposed changes to the north elevation. Ms. Simpkins stated the change is enabling the use of the property, which has been vacant for some time, and the change is on the non-primary façade. Ms. Nelsen agreed. Chair Dunn stated moving the door will allow the maintenance of the original interior feel. Applicant Presentation – Part 2 Mr. Shuff stated this 3-story building is almost a transition between the historic structures and larger high-density projects. Mr. Russell discussed the high-density mixed-use zone district which was formed when the West Central Area Plan was adopted in response to off-campus housing issues and demands. He noted residents in the area helped create the zone district. Mr. Shuff discussed the changing context of the area and discussed the proposed new building and site constraints. He detailed the proposed project aspects to reduce massing and relate to the homes. He stated the building will contain 48 studio and one-bedroom units, 720 will have two units, and 730 will have three units. The site contains 44 parking spaces. Mr. Shuff requested feedback on materials and minimization of the visual impact of the new building. Commission Questions and Discussion – Part 2 Chair Dunn requested input on the widths, articulation and modularity. Ms. Simpkins commented on placing the gabled roof on the front of the building. Mr. Shuff replied that was the original design; however, that became a bit more of a strong design element. Mr. Bello agreed with Ms. Simpkins and stated the gabled roof softens the building whereas the parapet does not speak to the historic buildings at all. Chair Dunn agreed and suggested mimicking the plain, sloped roof of 730. Ms. Nelsen asked if Mr. Shuff had considered reducing the overall footprint and increasing the building's height in places. Mr. Shuff replied that could be considered. Ms. Nelsen asked if the uncovered surface parking could be eliminated if fourth story units were added in the stead of first story units. Mr. Shuff replied that could be considered but the footprint would likely not change much. Mr. Bello suggested adding a fourth story and making the building rectangular to provide more separation from 720. Ms. Gensmer stated she would like to see the option but stated she is hesitant about adding another story as that could make the massing less compatible. ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 108 EXCERPT City of Fort Collins Page 3 April 17, 2019 Mr. Bello noted the properties were originally designated with a plan for a five-story building. Mr. Shuff stated his preference would be to stick with the plan as is and stated an L-shape would likely still be required even with a fourth story. He stated a three-story building would be less impactful to 720 even if it is closer. Ms. Wallace agreed and expressed concern about a fourth story and stated she would rather see an L-shaped three-story building. Chair Dunn agreed. Ms. Nelsen stated she is not concerned about a fourth story if it is done in a thoughtful manner and it could provide additional green space and preserve the original relationship between 720 and 730. Mr. Shuff replied they will do what they can to open that space within the current design. Ms. Nelsen stated the roof lines of historic structures do not necessarily need to be replicated in order to respectfully acknowledge their massing. She stated the massing feels like it is detracting from the historic structures. Chair Dunn stated the complexity of the roof is detracting. Mr. Shuff asked if the Commission is comfortable with the overall form and context. Chair Dunn stated she appreciates the step backs. Ms. Gensmer agreed. Chair Dunn stated she prefers a shorter building closer to 720 rather than a taller building. Ms. Wallace and Ms. Gensmer agreed. Ms. Simpkins stated the mass and overall scale is appropriate and suggested using simpler lines in the new building. Chair Dunn stated there may be a simpler way to add modularity. Chair Dunn requested input as to the building materials. Mr. Shuff stated they will include stucco, brick and lap siding with more stucco on the south elevation. Ms. Gensmer stated the Commission would like to see quantities and colors of the proposed materials. Mr. Shuff stated there could be some options to use color within an historic palette on the homes. Chair Dunn requested input on the façade details and window shapes. Mr. Bello noted there are some square windows on the back side of 730. Mr. Shuff stated they can look at other window designs. Chair Dunn replied the design seems to meet Code. Chair Dunn suggested the parking garage opening looks a bit industrial and suggested making it look more residential. Ms. Wallace suggested connecting the two properties with some type of walkway. Chair Dunn suggested naming the 730 building Brownmar, its historic name. ***END EXCERPT*** ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 109 720 W. Prospect Haven Apartments Landmark Preservation Commission February 19 th 2020 LPC Meeting ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 110 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Conditions 730 W. Prospect South Elevation West Elevation ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 111 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Conditions 730 W. Prospect North Elevation East Elevation ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 112 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Conditions 730 W. Prospect North side of brick chimney Deterioration at barge rafters Wood window sill Buckled roof shingles ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 113 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Conditions 730 W. Prospect Previous stuccoo repair (door infill?) at north elevation ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 114 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Floor Plans 730 W. Prospect ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 115 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Proposed Floor Plans 730 W. Prospect ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 116 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Elevations 730 W. Prospect ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 117 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Proposed Elevations 730 W. Prospect ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 118 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Proposed Elevations 730 W. Prospect ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 119 720 W. Prospect Haven Apartments Landmark Preservation Commission February 19 th 2020 LPC Meeting ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 120 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Conditions and Neighborhood Context CONTEXT ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 121 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Conditions and Neighborhood Context CONTEXT ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 122 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Existing Conditions and Neighborhood Context CONTEXT ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 123 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments SITE DATA Zoning • HMN - High Density Mixed Use • Density – min. of 20 d.u./acre • Building Height – maximum 5 stories • Allowed uses – multi-family, mixed-use, frat/sorority houses, places of worship, restaurants, retail, personal and business services • The site is in the TOD Overlay District Site • 1.19 Acres • Site is now platted as 720 W. Prospect ZONING ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 124 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments PROPOSED Previous and Current Site Plan Concepts Previous Design Current Design ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 125 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments PROPOSED Proposed Site Plan ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 126 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments PROPOSED Proposed Landscape Plan ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 127 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Apartment Building PROPOSED ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 128 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Apartment Building PROPOSED Current Design Previous Design ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 129 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Apartment Building PROPOSED Current Design Previous Design ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 130 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Apartment Building PROPOSED Current Design Previous Design ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 131 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments Apartment Building PROPOSED Current Design Previous Design ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 132 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments PROPOSED SITE PERSPECTIVES: ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 133 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments PROPOSED SITE PERSPECTIVES: ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 134 720 W. Prospect: Haven Apartments PROPOSED SITE PERSPECTIVES: ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 135 720 W. Prospect Haven Apartments Landmark Preservation Commission February 19 th 2020 LPC Meeting ITEM 5, EXHIBIT A Applicant Presentation presented at hearing Packet Pg. 136 ϭϱ Ϯ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϮ ϵ ϴ Ϯϰ Zϲ Zϭ ZϮ tϰ ϭϯ ϭϮ ϵ ϴ tϰ Ϯϰ ϭϮ ϰ ϯ ϭϰ Ϯ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϭ ϲ ϲ ϳ ϭϰ ϭϱ ϭϲ Ϯϱ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ Zϰ tϱ tϱ tϱ tϭ Zϲ ϲ ϳ ϭϲ ϭϱ ϭϰ Ϯϱ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϬϮ͗ϰϵ͗ϰϲWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ >sd/KE^ ϭϵϭϲ͘Ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϮͬϭϬͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϭ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ϭϱ ϱ ϯ ϭϮ Ϯ ϱ ϰ ϯ Ϯ ϭ Ϯϯ ϯ ϭϮ ϭϱ ϭϰ ϮϮ Ϯϭ ϮϬ ϭϭ ϭϬ Ϯϴ Zϲ Zϲ tϱ Zϰ Zϭ ZϮ tϱ tϮ tϮ tϭ tϯ ϱ ϰ ϯ Ϯ ϭ Ϯϯ tϭ tϱ Zϰ ZϮ Zϲ tϭ ϮϮ Ϯϭ ϮϬ ϭϭ ϭϬ ϭϰ Ϯϴ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϬϮ͗ϱϬ͗ϬϯWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ >sd/KE^ ϭϵϭϲ͘Ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϮͬϭϬͬϮϬϭϵ >WϮ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW h/>dͲ/EEdZd/EDEd EdZdy/^d/E'WK<d KKZ>Kd/KE ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϵ ϴ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϯ ϭϮ ϭϰ Ϯϴ Ϯϱ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ >Kt >Kt >Kt >Kt ϯ Ϯ ϰ ϱ ϰ Ϯ Ϯ ϯ ϭϬ ϭϵ ϳ ϵ ϳ ϴ ϴ ϳ ϳ ϵ ϵ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϵ ϵ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϵ ϴ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϯ ϭϮ ϭϰ Ϯϴ >Kt Ϯϱ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ >Kt >Kt >Kt ϳ ϵ ϵ ϭϳ ϵ ϵ ϳ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϴ ϳ ϰ ϵ ϳ ϵ ϭϬ ϳ ϭϮ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϵ ϴ ϴ ϭϮ ϭϰ ϭϮ ϰ ϳ ϳ ϴ ϴ ϴ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϳ Ϯϰ Ϯϯ ϮϬ Ϯϭ ϮϮ ϭϮΖͲϲΗ ϭϮΖͲϲΗ ϭϭΖͲϮϭͬϰΗ ϰΗ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϳ Ϯϰ Ϯϯ ϮϬ Ϯϭ ϮϮ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϰ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϳ ϭϴ ϭϵ ϮϬ Ϯϭ ϮϮ Ϯϯ Ϯϰ KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿ>/d,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿ>/d,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿ>/dW/dhZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿ>/dW/dhZt/EKt tKK&ZD EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>dhE<EKtE W/dhZt/EKtt/d,Kh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^d/d,Z^/ tKKͬs/Ez>&ZD KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> W/dhZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϰ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϳ ϮϬ Ϯϭ ϮϮ Ϯϰ Ϯϱ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ Ϯϴ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϬϮ͗ϱϬ͗ϰϭWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ y/^d/E' W,KdK^ ϭϵϭϲ͘Ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϮͬϭϬͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϲ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'Ϯ EK /^^h d y/^d/E't^d>sd/KE y/^d/E'EKZd,>sd/KE y/^d/E'^d>sd/KE y/^d/E'^Khd,>sd/KE ITEM 5, EXHIBIT B Building 2 Submittal presented at hearing Packet Pg. 142 Zϳ Zϭ tϭ tϲ Zϱ Zϰ Zϯ ZϮ ϭϰ Zϯ ϭϮ ϭϭ ϵ ϭϴ ϭϳ ϭϬ ϭϲ ϭϱ ϭϰ ϵ ϭϭ ϭϬ ϭϮ ϭϰ ϭϴ ϭϳ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϯ ϭϮ ϭϲ ϭϭ ϭϮ ϭϱ ϭϰ ϭϯ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϴ ϳ ϲ ϱ Ϯϭ ϭϲ tϮ Zϭ tϲ Zϰ Zϳ WZKWK^>Kd/KE K&dtK;ϮͿEt >dZ/DdZ^ ϲ ϱ ϭϲ ϴ ϳ ϵ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ ϭϱ Ϯ ϭϲ ϭϯ ϭϮ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϰ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϭϱ Zϳ tϰ tϭ Zϭ Zϯ ZϮ Zϯ ZϮ Zϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϭϱ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭ ϮϬ ϭϵ ϭϯ ϲϭͬϮΗ ϭϰ ϭϮ ϭϯ Zϭ tϰ tϭ Zϰ Zϳ ZϮ Zϯ ZϮ ϭϯ ϭϵ ϭ ϮϬ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ ϱ ϰ ϯ Ϯ ϭ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ UP UP UP DN DN UP ϭ ϭϰ ϭϵ ϭϴ ϭϳ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϵ ϭϯ ϭϮ ϭϭ ϭϬ ϴ ϳ ϲ ϱ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ;>KtͿ ;>KtͿ ;>KtͿ ;>KtͿ ϮϬ ;KsͿ Ϯϭ ;KsͿ ;>KtͿ ZKKD ϭϬϯ ZKKD ϮϬϮ D/E ϭϬϮ D/E ϮϬϭ EdZz ϭϬϭ ϮϬϭ ϭϬϭ ϭϬϯ ϬϬϭ ϮϬϮ d, ϮϬϯ ϮΖͲϲΗ ϰΖͲϲΗ ϳ ϴ͘ϭ ϴ͘ϭ ϴ͘ϭ ϭ ϴ͘ϭ ϲ ϴ ϯ Ϯ ϰ ϱ ϭ ϭϰ ϭϵ ϭϴ ϭϳ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϵ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϯ Ϯϭ ϭϮ ϭϵ EKEͲKZ/'/E> W/dhZt/EKt s/Ez>&ZD KZ/'/E> tE/E't/EKt tKK&ZDt/d,/s/>/d ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt ^d>^^,ͬtKK&ZD t/d,/s/>/d EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>ddtEϭϵϰϵEϭϵϲϴ W/dhZt/EKt tKK&ZD EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>dhE<EKtE Kh>Ͳ,hE't/EKt s/Ez>&ZD EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>dhE<EKtE Kh>Ͳ,hE't/EKt s/Ez>&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZDt/d, KZd/s/s/>/d KZ/'/E> d,Z;ϯͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD Et^dKZD^ZE^/E^d>>dydZ/KZ;hE<EKtEdͿ ϭϰ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϳ ϭϴ ϮϬ KZ/'/E> Kh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD Et^dKZD^ZE/E^d>>d ydZ/KZ;hE<EKtEKZ/'/EͿ KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt ^d>^^,ͬtKK&ZD t/d,/s/>/d KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt ^d>^^,ͬtKK&ZD ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϭ ϭϭ ϭϮ ϭϯ ϭϰ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϳ ϭϴ ϭϵ ϮϬ Ϯϭ ϮϬϭ K>,hd ϭ5 Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϬϮ͗Ϯϳ͗ϱϵWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ y/^d/E'W,KdK^ ϭϵϭϲ͘ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϮͬϭϬͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϱ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'ϯ EK /^^h d ^d>sd/KE EKZd,>sd/KE t^d>sd/KE ^Khd,>sd/KE ITEM 5, EXHIBIT C Building 3 Submittal presented at hearing Packet Pg. 147 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT D Photos of Materials Shown at Hearing Packet Pg. 148 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT D Photos of Materials Shown at Hearing Packet Pg. 149 ITEM 5, EXHIBIT D Photos of Materials Shown at Hearing Packet Pg. 150 t/d,/s/>/d KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt ^d>^^,ͬtKK&ZD t/d,/s/>/d KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt ^d>^^,ͬtKK&ZD t/d,/s/>/d KZ/'/E> Kh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>dhE<EKtE Kh>Ͳ,hE't/EKt s/Ez>&ZD EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>dhE<EKtE Kh>Ͳ,hE't/EKt s/Ez>&ZD EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>dhE<EKtE Kh>Ͳ,hE't/EKt s/Ez>&ZD t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϳ t^ϴ t^ϱ t^ϱ t^ϱ t^ϱ t^ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϵ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϵ t^ϵ t^ϵ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϰ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϵ t^ϵ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϵ t^Ϯ t^ϭϬ t^ϵ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϱ t^ϱ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϵ t^Ϯ t^ϱ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϵ t^ϱ , DhEd/E^ WE hWWZ^^, >KtZ^^, ^/>> ZK<EͬD/^^/E' WE Z'/KEdKDK>/^, η t/EKtd' t/EKt/E^dE &ZD dyd t/EKt^Z/Wd/KE t^η t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE ^hZszEKdͲ ^^,h> WWZKy/Dd&>KKZ>/E EKd^͗ ͻ >>t/EKts/t^/Ed,t/EKt Z,/>/dd/KE^dhzW/dd, ydZ/KZ>sd/KEK&d,t/EKt͘ ͻ &/>sZ/&zd,d>>t/EKt ,ZtZ/^/EtKZ</E'KE/d/KE͘ ͻ &/>sZ/&zydEdK&ZW/Z ZYh/Z&KZ,t/EKt͘ '>/E'WZK>DEKd^͗ Z<ͬdZ/KZd'>/E'Ͳ ^EKdt^Ϯ D/^^/E't/EKtWEͲ ^EKdt^ϯ t/EKt^^,KDW>d>zZh^dͲ sZ/&z/&ZW>DEd/^E^Zz t/EKtKsZEW/EdͲ sZ/&z/&ZW>DEd/^E^^Zz t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ ϱ ϰ ϯ Ϯ ϭ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϬϮ͗Ϯϳ͗ϱϲWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE ^dhz ϭϵϭϲ͘ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϮͬϭϬͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϰ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'ϯ EK /^^h d ^>͗ ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE^,h> t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KEEKd^ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ t^ϭ ^ZWE^E>KK^W/Ed&ZKDy/^d/E'tKKt/EKt&ZD͕^^,͕EDhEd/E^Ͳ WZWZt/EKt&KZEtWZ/DZEW/Ed&/E/^,͘ t^Ϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'Z<KZdZ/KZ/dt/EKt'>/E'WhddzͲZW>t/d,Et s>t/EKt'>/E'͘ t^ϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'WZd/>ZK<E'>^^/&^d/>>WZ^EdEZW>t/d,EtϭͬϴΗd,/< >Z&>Kd'>^^Ͳ/E^d>>Ets>t/EKt'>/E'Whddz͘ t^ϰ ZW>D/^^/E'tKKt/EKtKDWKEEdt/d,/EͲ</EtKKDdZ/>ͲWZKs/ WZ/DZEW/Ed&/E/^,͘ t^ϱ WZWZZzZKdd^hZ&&KZEtϮͲWZdWKyzKE^K>/EdͲ^,W͕^E͕E ZW/ZZ^ZYh/ZͲWZKs/EtWZ/DZEW/Ed&/E/^,͘ t^ϲ ZDKsy/^d/E'>hDhEhDdZ/D>/E'/E^d>>KsZtKKt/EKtdZ/DͲ WZWZtKKdZ/D&KZEt&/E/^,^͘ t^ϳ WZKs/EtϭyϰtKKdZ/DdydZ/KZ^/K&t/EKtdKDd,dZ/DKEKd,Z t/EKt^ZKhE,Kh^ͲWZKs/WZ/DZEW/Ed&/E/^,͘ t^ϴ ZDKsy/^d/E't/EKt,dZ/DW/ͲWZKs/EtϭyϰtKKdZ/DW/E &>^,/E'dKDd,,dZ/DdKd,Zt/EKt/E^dE^ͲWZKs/WZ/DZEW/Ed &/E/^,͘ t^ϵ ZDKsy/^d/E't/EKt^dKZD^ZE/E/d^Ed/ZdzEWZWZZ^&KZEt tKZ<͘ t^ϭϬ ZDKsy/^d/E'W>ztKKt/EKtKsZ/E/d^Ed/Zdz͘ZDKsy/^d/E'W/Ed&ZKD t/EKtWE^͕d</E'ZEKddKD''>^^͘ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE^,h> d' W/Ed KE/d/KE &ZDE^/>> KE/d/KE ^^, KE/d/KE '>/E' WZK>D^ ,ZtZ KsZ>> KE/d/KE KDDEd^ ϭ hE<EKtE y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed WZs/Kh^>zZW>s/Ez>t/EKtWZKWK^dKZD/E Ϯ hE<EKtE y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed WZs/Kh^>zZW>s/Ez>t/EKtWZKWK^dKZD/E ϯ Eͬ y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed WZs/Kh^>zZW>s/Ez>t/EKtWZKWK^dKZD/E ϰ hE<EKtE y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed WZs/Kh^>zZW>s/Ez>t/EKtWZKWK^dKZD/E ϱ hE<EKtE y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed WZs/Kh^>zZW>s/Ez>t/EKtWZKWK^dKZD/E ϲ WKKZ WKKZ &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ sZ/&zydEd^K&ZYh/ZtKZ</E&/> ϳ WKKZ WKKZ &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ sZ/&zydEd^K&ZYh/ZtKZ</E&/> ϴ WKKZ WKKZ &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ sZ/&zydEd^K&ZYh/ZtKZ</E&/> ϴ WKKZ WKKZ WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ sZ/&zydEd^K&ZYh/ZtKZ</E&/> ϵ &/Z y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ Ͳ y>>>Ed ϭϬ y>>Ed y>>Ed y>>Ed sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ZDKsEZW>^dKZD^ZE ϭϭ y>>Ed y>>Ed y>>Ed Ͳ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed ZDKsEZW>^dKZD^ZE ϭϭ y>>Ed y>>Ed y>>Ed Ͳ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed ZDKsEZW>^dKZD^ZE ϭϭ y>>Ed y>>Ed y>>Ed Ͳ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed ZDKsEZW>^dKZD^ZE ϭϮ y>>Ed &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϭϯ 'KK &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϰ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ZDKsEZW>^dKZD^ZE ϭϱ hE<EKtE hE<EKtE WKKZ Ͳ WKKZ sZ/&zydEd^K&ZYh/ZtKZ</E&/> ϭϲ WKKZ WKKZ WKKZ Ͳ WKKZ sZ/&zydEd^K&ZYh/ZtKZ</E&/> ϭϳ WKKZ &/Z &/Z Ͳ &/Z ϭϴ WKKZ hE<EKtE hE<EKtE ͕ Ͳ WKKZ ϭϵ &/Z &/Z &/Z Ͳ &/Z ZDKsEZW>^dKZD^ZE ϮϬ hE<EKtE y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed WZs/Kh^>zZW>t/EKtWZKWK^dKZD/E Ϯϭ hE<EKtE y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed WZs/Kh^>zZW>t/EKtWZKWK^dKZD/E ^>͗ ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE>'E ^>͗ ϭͬϮΗсϭΖͲϬΗ KKZZ,/>/dd/KE ITEM 5, EXHIBIT C Building 3 Submittal presented at hearing Packet Pg. 146 ϭϯ ϭϮ ϭϭ ϭϬ ϴ ϳ ϲ ϱ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϮϬ Ϯϭ ;>KtͿ ;>KtͿ ;>KtͿ ;>KtͿ ;KsͿ ;KsͿ ;>KtͿ ϭϱ ϭϲ ϭϴ ϭϳ ϭϵ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϬϮ͗Ϯϳ͗ϱϰWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ W>E^ ϭϵϭϲ͘ϯ :t ϭϮͬϭϬͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϯ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'ϯ EK /^^h d ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ ϬϭͲ &/Z^d&>KKZDK>/d/KEW>EͲ >W ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ h/>/E'ϯͲ &/Z^d&>KKZW>EͲ >W ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ ϬϬͲ ^DEd&>KKZW>EͲ >W ITEM 5, EXHIBIT C Building 3 Submittal presented at hearing Packet Pg. 145 ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϬϮ͗Ϯϳ͗ϱϯWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ >sd/KE^ ϭϵϭϲ͘ϯ :t ϭϮͬϭϬͬϮϬϭϵ >WϮ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'ϯ EK /^^h d >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ ϭ EKZd,>sd/KEͲ DK>/d/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ Ϯ EKZd,>sd/KEͲ WZKWK^ >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ ϯ t^d>sd/KEͲ DK>/d/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ ϰ t^d>sd/KEͲ WZKWK^ Ͳ^z^dDEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ tϭ y/^d/E'ydZ/KZt>>Ͳ^dhK^z^dDKsZ'>sE/Dd>>d,KsZtd,ZE/Z ZZ/ZKsZϭy^,d,/E'dydZ/KZ^/K&ϮyϰtKK^dh&ZD/E'dϭϲΗK͘͘ͲWZKs/ Et&/E/^,WZ^z^dDEKd΀t&η΁͘ tϰ EtydZ/KZ,>&Ͳ,/',dt>>Ͳ>^dKDZ/W/Ed/E^d>>KsZϯͲKdWKZd>E DEdΘ>/D^^dhK^z^dDKsZ'>sE/Dd>>d,dd,dKϰΗyϴΗyϭϲΗ Dh>K<ͲZ/E&KZWZ^dZhdhZ>Zt/E'^ͲDd,Et^dhKdydhZt/d, y/^d/E'ZKh',^dKZ^W>ddZ^,^dhKdydhZ͘ Zϭ EtϯϬzZ>^^ϰ,/',WZK&/>Z,/ddhZ>^W,>d^,/E'>^KEϯϬ>^^W,>d /DWZ'Edh/>/E'WWZt/d,'Z/EtdZ^,/>ds^Θs>>z^t/d, ^KEZzhEZ>zDEdKEϭϱͬϯϮΗK^ZKK&^,d,/E'KEy/^d/E'ϭytKK^,/W ^,d,/E'͘ZW/ZKZZW>EzdZ/KZd^</W^,d,/E'WZ/KZdK/E^d>>/E'EtK^ ZKK&^,d,/E'͘WZKs/Et'>sE/^Z/W'&>^,/E'dKd,Z<Es KE/d/KE^͘WZKs/E/E^d>>EtZͲϰϵ>KtEͲ/E/E^h>d/KEdy/^d/E'dd/^WZ͗ ^dZhd͘ ZϮ Et'>sE/ϱΗ,>&ZKhE'hddZ^t/d,'>sE/^d>,E'Z^dK/E^d>>d y/^d/E'yWK^ϮyϲZ&dZd/>^dy/^d/E'ZKK&s^͘ Zϯ EtϯΗ/DdZZKhE'>sE/KtE^WKhd^/E>h/E''>sE/^d>>Kt^E DKhEd/E',E'Z^͘ Zϰ y/^d/E'ϮyϴtKKZ'Z&dZdK^ZW͕^EEZ,/>/dt/d,ϮͲWZdWKyz &/>>ZEKZKE^K>/d/KEhd/>/dZ^t/d,ZzZKd͘WZKs/EtϭͲKdWZ/DZ EϮͲKdW/Ed&/E/^,͘ Zϳ y/^d/E'Z/<,/DEzt/d,^dhK&/E/^,dKZ/s^dhKWd,/E'EZW/ZdKDd, y/^d/E'^dhK&/E/^,͘WZKs/'>sE/Dd>W&>^,/E't/d,Z/W'dKWZKs/ td,Zd/',d^>͘ ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ Ϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'KEZd^>KE'ZͲWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϮ ZDKsy/^d/E''hddZ^E^^K/dtKK>K</E'ͬ&hZZ/E'dd,dKd,E^K&d, Z&dZd/>^͘WZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'KtE^WKhd^E^^K/dDKhEd/E'Z<d^E,ZtZͲWZWZ Z&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϰ ZDKsy/^d/E't/Z/E'͕KEh/d͕W/W/E'͕dsEdEE͕>dZ/>WE>͕'^DdZKZKd,Z ^/D/>Z>DEd^/E>h/E'^^K/dDKhEd/E'Z<d^ͬ,ZtZͲWZWZZ&KZEt tKZ<͘ ϭϱ ZDKsy/^d/E'EDh>d/W>ZKK&/E'>zZ^/E>h/E'ZKK&:<EW>hD/E'sEd^KtE dKd,y/^d/E'tKK^</W^,d,/E'ZKK&<EWZWZy/^d/E'ZKK&<&KZEt ZKK&/E'^z^dD͘/Ed/&zZ^K&y/^/dE'tKK^</W^,d,/E'd,dZYh/ZZW/ZKZ ZW>DEdt/d,/EͲ</EDdZ/>^͘ZdKd<EdKEKdD'Z'Z&dZ^͕Z&dZ d/>^͕KZ:Edy/^d/E'^dhK&/E/^,^͘ ϭϲ ZDKsy/^d/E'D,E/>&>hE^^K/d^hWWKZd^͕,ZtZEZ<d^ͲWZWZ Z&KZEttKZ<͘ ITEM 5, EXHIBIT C Building 3 Submittal presented at hearing Packet Pg. 144 EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϬϮ͗Ϯϳ͗ϰϰWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ >sd/KE^ ϭϵϭϲ͘ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϮͬϭϬͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϭ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'ϯ EK /^^h d >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ Ϯ ^Khd,>sd/KEͲ WZKWK^ >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ ϭ ^Khd,>sd/KEͲ DK>/d/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ ϯ ^d>sd/KEͲ DK>/d/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ ϰ ^d>sd/KEͲ WZKWK^ Ͳ^z^dDEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ tϭ y/^d/E'ydZ/KZt>>Ͳ^dhK^z^dDKsZ'>sE/Dd>>d,KsZtd,ZE/Z ZZ/ZKsZϭy^,d,/E'dydZ/KZ^/K&ϮyϰtKK^dh&ZD/E'dϭϲΗK͘͘ͲWZKs/ Et&/E/^,WZ^z^dDEKd΀t&η΁͘ tϮ y/^d/E'ydZ/KZt>>ͲWZKs/Et>^dKDZ/W/Ed/E^d>>KsZEtϯͲKd WKZd>EDEdΘ>/D^^dhK^z^dDKsZy/^d/E'>d,KsZy/^d/E'td,Z Z^/^dEd^dhKWWZ͘WZKs/E/E^d>>Et>KtE/E>>h>K^/E^h>d/KEEϱͬϴΗ 'zW^hDKZ&/E/^,d/E^/&t/d,dydhZ͕WZ/DZEW/Ed&/E/^,WZ^W^͘Dd, Et^dhKdydhZ&/E/^,t/d,d,y/^d/E'ZKh',^dKZ^W>ddZ^,^dhKdydhZ͘ tϲ Zϭ EtϯϬzZ>^^ϰ,/',WZK&/>Z,/ddhZ>^W,>d^,/E'>^KEϯϬ>^^W,>d /DWZ'Edh/>/E'WWZt/d,'Z/EtdZ^,/>ds^Θs>>z^t/d, ^KEZzhEZ>zDEdKEϭϱͬϯϮΗK^ZKK&^,d,/E'KEy/^d/E'ϭytKK^,/W ^,d,/E'͘ZW/ZKZZW>EzdZ/KZd^</W^,d,/E'WZ/KZdK/E^d>>/E'EtK^ ZKK&^,d,/E'͘WZKs/Et'>sE/^Z/W'&>^,/E'dKd,Z<Es KE/d/KE^͘WZKs/E/E^d>>EtZͲϰϵ>KtEͲ/E/E^h>d/KEdy/^d/E'dd/^WZ͗ ^dZhd͘ ZϮ Et'>sE/ϱΗ,>&ZKhE'hddZ^t/d,'>sE/^d>,E'Z^dK/E^d>>d y/^d/E'yWK^ϮyϲZ&dZd/>^dy/^d/E'ZKK&s^͘ Zϯ EtϯΗ/DdZZKhE'>sE/KtE^WKhd^/E>h/E''>sE/^d>>Kt^E DKhEd/E',E'Z^͘ Zϰ y/^d/E'ϮyϴtKKZ'Z&dZdK^ZW͕^EEZ,/>/dt/d,ϮͲWZdWKyz &/>>ZEKZKE^K>/d/KEhd/>/dZ^t/d,ZzZKd͘WZKs/EtϭͲKdWZ/DZ EϮͲKdW/Ed&/E/^,͘ Zϱ y/^d/E'ϮyϲyWK^tKKZ&dZd/>^dK^ZW͕^EEZ,/>/dt/d, ϮͲWZdWKyz&/>>ZEKZKE^K>/d/KEhd/>/dZ^t/d,ZzZKd͘WZKs/Et ϭͲKdWZ/DZEϮͲKdW/Ed&/E/^,͘ Zϳ y/^d/E'Z/<,/DEzt/d,^dhK&/E/^,dKZ/s^dhKWd,/E'EZW/ZdKDd, y/^d/E'^dhK&/E/^,͘WZKs/'>sE/Dd>W&>^,/E't/d,Z/W'dKWZKs/ td,Zd/',d^>͘ ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ ϭϭ Z&h>>zZDKsy/^d/E'^dhKydZ/KZ&/E/^,dKd,ydEd^&/EKEd,DK>/d/KE W>E^E>sd/KE^͘h^ZdKEKdD'^hZZKhE/E'E:EdtKKdZ/D͕ t/EKt^͕t>>^,d,/E'͕^dh&ZD/E'EKd,Z^^K/d>DEd^͘WZWZZ&KZ Et&/E/^,^͘ ϭϮ ZDKsy/^d/E''hddZ^E^^K/dtKK>K</E'ͬ&hZZ/E'dd,dKd,E^K&d, Z&dZd/>^͘WZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'KtE^WKhd^E^^K/dDKhEd/E'Z<d^E,ZtZͲWZWZ Z&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϰ ZDKsy/^d/E't/Z/E'͕KEh/d͕W/W/E'͕dsEdEE͕>dZ/>WE>͕'^DdZKZKd,Z ^/D/>Z>DEd^/E>h/E'^^K/dDKhEd/E'Z<d^ͬ,ZtZͲWZWZZ&KZEt tKZ<͘ ϭϱ ZDKsy/^d/E'EDh>d/W>ZKK&/E'>zZ^/E>h/E'ZKK&:<EW>hD/E'sEd^KtE dKd,y/^d/E'tKK^</W^,d,/E'ZKK&<EWZWZy/^d/E'ZKK&<&KZEt ZKK&/E'^z^dD͘/Ed/&zZ^K&y/^/dE'tKK^</W^,d,/E'd,dZYh/ZZW/ZKZ ZW>DEdt/d,/EͲ</EDdZ/>^͘ZdKd<EdKEKdD'Z'Z&dZ^͕Z&dZ d/>^͕KZ:Edy/^d/E'^dhK&/E/^,^͘ ϭϲ ZDKsy/^d/E'D,E/>&>hE^^K/d^hWWKZd^͕,ZtZEZ<d^ͲWZWZ Z&KZEttKZ<͘ ITEM 5, EXHIBIT C Building 3 Submittal presented at hearing Packet Pg. 143 ;/EdZ/KZt/EKtͲ EKd/E>h/E Z,/>/dd/KE^dhzͿ KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD ;/EdZ/KZt/EKtͲ EKd/E>h/E Z,/>/dd/KE^dhzͿ KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ^>//E't/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ^/y;ϲͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD Ϯϱ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ Ϯϴ KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD & t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϯ t^ϰ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϯ ϰ ϰ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϰ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ ;dzW͘Ϳ t^Ϯ t^ϭ , DhEd/E^ WE hWWZ^^, >KtZ^^, ^/>> ZK<EͬD/^^/E' WE Z'/KEdKDK>/^, η t/EKtd' t/EKt/E^dE &ZD dyd t/EKt^Z/Wd/KE t^η t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE ^hZszEKdͲ ^^,h> WWZKy/Dd&>KKZ>/E EKd^͗ ͻ >>t/EKts/t^/Ed,t/EKt Z,/>/dd/KE^dhzW/dd, ydZ/KZ>sd/KEK&d,t/EKt͘ ͻ >>t/EKt^ͬydZ/KZKKZ^dK Z/s&h>>s>hd/KE/E&/>z ^>d,/^dKZ/^hKEdZdKZ &KZd,&K>>Kt/E'Z/dZ/͗ ϭ͘ sZ/&zd,d>>t/EKtE KKZ,ZtZ/^/E tKZ</E'KE/d/KE͘ Ϯ͘ sZ/&zydEdK&ZW/Z ZYh/Z&KZ,t/EKt EydZ/KZKKZ͘ '>/E'WZK>DEKd^͗ Z<ͬdZ/KZd'>/E'Ͳ ^EKdt^Ϯ D/^^/E't/EKtWEͲ ^EKdt^ϯ t/EKt/EhE<EKtEKE/d/KEͲ sZ/&z/E&/> t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^Ϯ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϬϮ͗ϱϬ͗ϬϳWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE ϭϵϭϲ͘Ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϮͬϭϬͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϱ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'Ϯ ^>͗ ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE^,h> EK /^^h d t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KEEKd^ DZ< ^Z/Wd/KE t^ϭ ^ZWE^E>KK^W/Ed&ZKDy/^d/E' tKKt/EKt&ZD͕^^,͕EDhEd/E^Ͳ WZWZt/EKt&KZEtWZ/DZEW/Ed &/E/^,͘ t^Ϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'Z<KZdZ/KZ/d t/EKt'>/E'WhddzͲZW>t/d,Et s>t/EKt'>/E'͘ t^ϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'WZd/>ZK<E'>^^/&^d/>> WZ^EdEZW>t/d,EtϭͬϴΗd,/<>Z &>Kd'>^^Ͳ/E^d>>Ets>t/EKt '>/E'Whddz͘ t^ϰ ZW>D/^^/E'tKKt/EKtKDWKEEdt/d, /EͲ</EtKKDdZ/>ͲWZKs/WZ/DZE W/Ed&/E/^,͘ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE^,h> d' W/Ed KE/d/KE &ZDE^/>> KE/d/KE ^^, KE/d/KE '>/E' WZK>D^ ,ZtZ KsZ>> KE/d/KE KDDEd^ ϭ 'KK &/Z WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE Ϯ 'KK WKKZ WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE Ϯ 'KK &/Z 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK Ϯ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ϯ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϰ 'KK 'KK WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE ϰ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ZW>t/EKtdKDd'Z^^ZYh/ZDEd^ ϱ &/Z 'KK WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE ϱ &/Z 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϱ &/Z 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϲ 'KK 'KK WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE ϲ 'KK 'KK &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϲ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ZDKs&KZ/E^d>>d/KEK&EthE/dEdZzKKZ ϳ &/Z &/Z y>>Ed sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK EKEͲKZ/'/E>t/EKt ϳ WKKZ &/Z y>>Ed Ͳ &/Z EKEͲKZ/'/E>t/EKt ϳ &/Z &/Z y>>Ed sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z EKEͲKZ/'/E>t/EKt ϴ &/Z 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϴ &/Z 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϵ &/Z 'KK WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>D/^^/E'WE/E>KtZ^^, ϵ WKKZ 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϵ WKKZ 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϬ WKKZ WKKZ 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϬ WKKZ WKKZ 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϬ &/Z WKKZ 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϭ WKKZ &/Z 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϭ WKKZ &/Z 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϮ &/Z 'KK &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϯ &/Z &/Z WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>D/^^/E'WE/E>KtZ^^, ϭϰ &/Z &/Z 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϱ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϭϱ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϭϲ 'KK 'KK 'KK Ͳ ϭϳ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϭϵ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϵ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϮϬ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK Ϯϭ 'KK &/Z WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE Ϯϭ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϮϮ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK Ϯϯ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK Ϯϰ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z Ϯϰ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z Ϯϰ &/Z &/Z WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>D/^^/E'WE/E>KtZ^^, Ϯϰ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z Ϯϰ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z Ϯϰ& &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z Ϯϱ &/Z &/Z WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE Ϯϲ &/Z &/Z WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE Ϯϳ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z Ϯϴ WKKZ &/Z WKKZ ͕͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ^>͗ ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE>'E ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ ϰ ZDKsy/^d/E't/EKtEWZWZZ&KZ EttKZ<͘ZdKd<EdKEKdD' :EdtKKdZ/D͕^dhK&/E/^,^EKd,Z ^^K/d>DEd^͘ ^>͗ ϭͬϮΗсϭΖͲϬΗ KKZZ,/>/dd/KE WINDOWS 18 & 19 ARE INTERIOR WINODWS AND NOT INCLUDED WITH WINDOW REHABILATION SCHEDULE ITEM 5, EXHIBIT B Building 2 Submittal presented at hearing Packet Pg. 141 WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϬϮ͗ϱϬ͗ϬϲWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ WZKWK^ ^KE>s> >dZd/KE^ ϭϵϭϲ͘Ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϮͬϭϬͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϰ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'Ϯ EK /^^h d ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ WZKWK^^KE>s>DK>/d/KEW>E ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ WZKWK^^KE>s>&>KKZW>E ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ ϰ ZDKsy/^d/E't/EKtEWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ZdK d<EdKEKdD':EdtKKdZ/D͕^dhK&/E/^,^EKd,Z ^^K/d>DEd^͘ ϳ ZDKsy/^d/E'/EdZ/KZt>>ͬWZd/d/KE&ZD/E'EWZWZZ&KZ EttKZ<͘ ϴ ZDKsy/^d/E'/EdZ/KZtKKt>>ͬ/>/E'>d,EWZWZZ&KZ EttKZ<͘ ϵ ZDKsy/^d/E'/EdZ/KZtKKKKZE^>s'&KZZh^ͲWZWZZ &KZEttKZ<͘h^ZEKddKD'KKZEKKZ,ZtZhZ/E' ZDKs>͘ ϭϬ ZDKsy/^d/E'tKK^d/Z/E>h/E'^dZ/E'Z^͕dZ^EZ/^Z^E ^^K/d>DEd^͘WZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϮ ZDKsy/^d/E''hddZ^E^^K/dtKK>K</E'ͬ&hZZ/E' dd,dKd,E^K&d,Z&dZd/>^͘WZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϰ ZDKsy/^d/E't/Z/E'͕KEh/d͕W/W/E'͕dsEdEE͕>dZ/>WE>͕'^ DdZKZKd,Z^/D/>Z>DEd^/E>h/E'^^K/dDKhEd/E' Z<d^ͬ,ZtZͲWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϳ ZDKsy/^d/E'W>hD/E'&/ydhZ^/E>h/E'dK/>d^͕d,dh͕&hd^͕ ,K^/^EKd,Z^^K/d/dD^ͲWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ITEM 5, EXHIBIT B Building 2 Submittal presented at hearing Packet Pg. 140 Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϬϮ͗ϱϬ͗ϬϱWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ WZKWK^ &/Z^d>s>>dZd/KE^ ϭϵϭϲ͘Ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϮͬϭϬͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϯ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'Ϯ EK /^^h d ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ WZKWK^&/Z^d>s>&>KKZW>E ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ WZKWK^&/Z^d>s>DK>/d/KEW>E ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ Ϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'KEZd^>KE'ZͲWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'KEZd^dKKWE^d/Z^ͲWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϰ ZDKsy/^d/E't/EKtEWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ZdK d<EdKEKdD':EdtKKdZ/D͕^dhK&/E/^,^EKd,Z ^^K/d>DEd^͘ ϱ ZDKsy/^d/E'KKZEWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ZdKd<E dKEKdD':EdtKKdZ/D͕^dhK&/E/^,^KZKd,Z^^K/d >DEd^͘ ϳ ZDKsy/^d/E'/EdZ/KZt>>ͬWZd/d/KE&ZD/E'EWZWZZ&KZ EttKZ<͘ ϴ ZDKsy/^d/E'/EdZ/KZtKKt>>ͬ/>/E'>d,EWZWZZ&KZ EttKZ<͘ ϵ ZDKsy/^d/E'/EdZ/KZtKKKKZE^>s'&KZZh^ͲWZWZZ &KZEttKZ<͘h^ZEKddKD'KKZEKKZ,ZtZhZ/E' ZDKs>͘ ϭϬ ZDKsy/^d/E'tKK^d/Z/E>h/E'^dZ/E'Z^͕dZ^EZ/^Z^E ^^K/d>DEd^͘WZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϵ ZDKsy/^d/E'tKK^d/Z,EZ/>d</E'ZEKddKD' >h^dZ^EEt>WK^d^Ͳ^>s'&KZZWhZWK^dKWK^/d^/K& ^d/Z͘ ITEM 5, EXHIBIT B Building 2 Submittal presented at hearing Packet Pg. 139 &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'Ϯ EK /^^h d >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ ϭ y/^d/E'EKZd,>sd/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ Ϯ y/^d/E't^d>sd/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ ϯ WZKWK^EKZd,>sd/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ ϰ WZKWK^t^d>sd/KE ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ Ϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'KEZd^>KE'ZͲWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'KEZd^dKKWE^d/Z^ͲWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϱ ZDKsy/^d/E'KKZEWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ZdKd<E dKEKdD':EdtKKdZ/D͕^dhK&/E/^,^KZKd,Z^^K/d >DEd^͘ ϭϮ ZDKsy/^d/E''hddZ^E^^K/dtKK>K</E'ͬ&hZZ/E' dd,dKd,E^K&d,Z&dZd/>^͘WZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϱ ZDKsy/^d/E'EDh>d/W>ZKK&/E'>zZ^/E>h/E'ZKK&:<E W>hD/E'sEd^KtEdKd,y/^d/E'tKK^</W^,d,/E'ZKK&<E WZWZy/^d/E'ZKK&<&KZEtZKK&/E'^z^dD͘/Ed/&zZ^K& y/^/dE'tKK^</W^,d,/E'd,dZYh/ZZW/ZKZZW>DEdt/d, /EͲ</EDdZ/>^͘ZdKd<EdKEKdD'Z'Z&dZ^͕Z&dZ d/>^͕KZ:Edy/^d/E'^dhK&/E/^,^͘ ITEM 5, EXHIBIT B Building 2 Submittal presented at hearing Packet Pg. 138 ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'Ϯ EK /^^h d >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ ϭ y/^d/E'^Khd,>sd/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ Ϯ WZKWK^^Khd,>sd/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ ϯ y/^d/E'^d>sd/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ ϰ WZKWK^^d>sd/KE ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ Ϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'KEZd^>KE'ZͲWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'KEZd^dKKWE^d/Z^ͲWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϰ ZDKsy/^d/E't/EKtEWZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ZdKd<EdKEKd D':EdtKKdZ/D͕^dhK&/E/^,^EKd,Z^^K/d>DEd^͘ ϲ ZDKsy/^d/E'tKKdZ/DEWZWZ&KZEttKZ<͘ZdKd<EdKEKd D':Ed^dhK&/E/^,^͕t/EKt^͕KKZ^EKd,Z^^K/d>DEd^͘ ϭϭ Z&h>>zZDKsy/^d/E'^dhKydZ/KZ&/E/^,dKd,ydEd^&/EKEd, DK>/d/KEW>E^E>sd/KE^͘h^ZdKEKdD'^hZZKhE/E'E:Ed tKKdZ/D͕t/EKt^͕t>>^,d,/E'͕^dh&ZD/E'EKd,Z^^K/d>DEd^͘ WZWZZ&KZEt&/E/^,^͘ ϭϮ ZDKsy/^d/E''hddZ^E^^K/dtKK>K</E'ͬ&hZZ/E'dd,dKd,E^ K&d,Z&dZd/>^͘WZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϯ ZDKsy/^d/E'KtE^WKhd^E^^K/dDKhEd/E'Z<d^E,ZtZͲ WZWZZ&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϰ ZDKsy/^d/E't/Z/E'͕KEh/d͕W/W/E'͕dsEdEE͕>dZ/>WE>͕'^DdZKZ Kd,Z^/D/>Z>DEd^/E>h/E'^^K/dDKhEd/E'Z<d^ͬ,ZtZͲWZWZ Z&KZEttKZ<͘ ϭϱ ZDKsy/^d/E'EDh>d/W>ZKK&/E'>zZ^/E>h/E'ZKK&:<EW>hD/E'sEd^ KtEdKd,y/^d/E'tKK^</W^,d,/E'ZKK&<EWZWZy/^d/E'ZKK&< &KZEtZKK&/E'^z^dD͘/Ed/&zZ^K&y/^/dE'tKK^</W^,d,/E'd,dZYh/Z ZW/ZKZZW>DEdt/d,/EͲ</EDdZ/>^͘ZdKd<EdKEKdD'Z' Z&dZ^͕Z&dZd/>^͕KZ:Edy/^d/E'^dhK&/E/^,^͘ Ͳ^z^dDEKd^Ͳ d' ^Z/Wd/KE tϭ y/^d/E'ydZ/KZt>>Ͳ^dhK^z^dDKsZ'>sE/Dd>>d,KsZtd,ZE/ZZZ/ZKsZϭy^,d,/E'dydZ/KZ^/ K&ϮyϰtKK^dh&ZD/E'dϭϲΗK͘͘ͲWZKs/Et&/E/^,WZ^z^dDEKd΀t&η΁͘ tϰ EtydZ/KZ,>&Ͳ,/',dt>>Ͳ>^dKDZ/W/Ed/E^d>>KsZϯͲKdWKZd>EDEdΘ>/D^^dhK^z^dDKsZ '>sE/Dd>>d,dd,dKϰΗyϴΗyϭϲΗDh>K<ͲZ/E&KZWZ^dZhdhZ>Zt/E'^ͲDd,Et^dhKdydhZt/d, y/^d/E'ZKh',^dKZ^W>ddZ^,^dhKdydhZ͘ tϱ Zϭ EtϯϬzZ>^^ϰ,/',WZK&/>Z,/ddhZ>^W,>d^,/E'>^KEϯϬ>^^W,>d/DWZ'Edh/>/E'WWZt/d,'Z/E tdZ^,/>ds^Θs>>z^t/d,^KEZzhEZ>zDEdKEϭϱͬϯϮΗK^ZKK&^,d,/E'KEy/^d/E'ϭytKK^,/W^,d,/E'͘ ZW/ZKZZW>EzdZ/KZd^</W^,d,/E'WZ/KZdK/E^d>>/E'EtK^ZKK&^,d,/E'͘WZKs/Et'>sE/^Z/W' &>^,/E'dKd,Z<EsKE/d/KE^͘WZKs/E/E^d>>EtZͲϰϵ>KtEͲ/E/E^h>d/KEdy/^d/E'dd/^WZ͗^dZhd͘ ZϮ Et'>sE/ϱΗ,>&ZKhE'hddZ^t/d,'>sE/^d>,E'Z^dK/E^d>>dy/^d/E'yWK^ϮyϲZ&dZd/>^dy/^d/E' ZKK&s^͘ Zϰ y/^d/E'ϮyϴtKKZ'Z&dZdK^ZW͕^EEZ,/>/dt/d,ϮͲWZdWKyz&/>>ZEKZKE^K>/d/KEhd/>/d Z^t/d,ZzZKd͘WZKs/EtϭͲKdWZ/DZEϮͲKdW/Ed&/E/^,͘ Zϲ y/^d/E'Z/<,/DEzdKZKE^dZhdhd/>//E'd,y/^d/E'Z/<^t/d,EWWZKsDKZdZE>z^/^EDKZdZd,d/^ KDWd/>t/d,d,y/^d/E'DKZdZ͘Dd,d,y/^d/E'DKZdZdKK>:K/EdWZK&/>EWZKs/'>sE/Dd>W&>^,/E' t/d,Z/W'dKWZKs/td,Zd/',d^>͘;y/^d/E'&/ZW>^^K/dt/d,d,/^,/DEz/^dKd<EKhdK&^Zs/Ϳ ITEM 5, EXHIBIT B Building 2 Submittal presented at hearing Packet Pg. 137 KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> dtK;ϮͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> Kh>,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ^>//E't/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ^/y;ϲͿKh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt^ tKK&ZD Ϯϱ Ϯϲ Ϯϳ Ϯϴ KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKK&ZD & t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϯ t^ϰ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϯ ϰ ϰ ϰ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϰ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ ;dzW͘Ϳ t^Ϯ t^ϭ ϰ t^Ϯ , DhEd/E^ WE hWWZ^^, >KtZ^^, ^/>> ZK<EͬD/^^/E' WE Z'/KEdKDK>/^, η t/EKtd' t/EKt/E^dE &ZD dyd t/EKt^Z/Wd/KE t^η t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE ^hZszEKdͲ ^^,h> WWZKy/Dd&>KKZ>/E EKd^͗ ͻ >>t/EKts/t^/Ed,t/EKt Z,/>/dd/KE^dhzW/dd, ydZ/KZ>sd/KEK&d,t/EKt͘ ͻ >>t/EKt^ͬydZ/KZKKZ^dK Z/s&h>>s>hd/KE/E&/>z ^>d,/^dKZ/^hKEdZdKZ &KZd,&K>>Kt/E'Z/dZ/͗ ϭ͘ sZ/&zd,d>>t/EKtE KKZ,ZtZ/^/E tKZ</E'KE/d/KE͘ Ϯ͘ sZ/&zydEdK&ZW/Z ZYh/Z&KZ,t/EKt EydZ/KZKKZ͘ '>/E'WZK>DEKd^͗ Z<ͬdZ/KZd'>/E'Ͳ ^EKdt^Ϯ D/^^/E't/EKtWEͲ ^EKdt^ϯ t/EKt/EhE<EKtEKE/d/KEͲ sZ/&z/E&/> t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^Ϯ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϭϭͬϮϮͬϮϬϭϵϭϭ͗Ϭϳ͗ϭϬD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ t/EKt Z,/>/dd/KE^dhz ϭϵϭϲ͘Ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϭͬ25ͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϱ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'Ϯ ^>͗ ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE^,h> EK /^^h d t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KEEKd^ DZ< ^Z/Wd/KE t^ϭ ^ĐƌĂƉĞĂŶĚƐĂŶĚůŽŽƐĞƉĂŝŶƚĨƌŽŵĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŽŽĚǁŝŶĚŽǁ ĨƌĂŵĞ͕ƐĂƐŚ͕ĂŶĚŵƵŶƚŝŶƐĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞǁŝŶĚŽǁĨŽƌŶĞǁ ƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ t^Ϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐƌĂĐŬĞĚŽƌĚĞƚĞƌŝŽƌŝĂƚĞĚǁŝŶĚŽǁ ŐůĂǌŝŶŐƉƵƚƚǇĂŶĚƌĞƉůĂĐĞǁŝƚŚŶĞǁďĞǀĞůĞĚǁŝŶĚŽǁ ŐůĂǌŝŶŐ͘ t^ϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƉĂƌƚŝĂůďƌŽŬĞŶŐůĂƐƐŝĨƐƚŝůůƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂŶĚ ƌĞƉůĂĐĞǁŝƚŚŶĞǁϭͬϴΗƚŚŝĐŬĐůĞĂƌĨůŽĂƚŐůĂƐƐĂŶĚŝŶƐƚĂůů ŶĞǁďĞǀĞůĞĚǁŝŶĚŽǁŐůĂǌŝŶŐƉƵƚƚǇ͘ t^ϰ ZĞƉůĂĐĞŵŝƐƐŝŶŐǁŽŽĚǁŝŶĚŽǁĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶͲŬŝŶĚ ǁŽŽĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE^,h> d' W/Ed KE/d/KE &ZDE^/>> KE/d/KE ^^, KE/d/KE '>/E' WZK>D^ ,ZtZ KsZ>> KE/d/KE KDDEd^ ϭ 'KK &/Z WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE Ϯ 'KK WKKZ WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE Ϯ 'KK &/Z 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK Ϯ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ϯ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϰ 'KK 'KK WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE ϰ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ZW>t/EKtdKDd'Z^^ZYh/ZDEd^ ϱ &/Z 'KK WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE ϱ &/Z 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϱ &/Z 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϲ 'KK 'KK WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE ϲ 'KK 'KK &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϲ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ZDKs&KZ/E^d>>d/KEK&EthE/dEdZzKKZ ϳ &/Z &/Z y>>Ed sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK EKEͲKZ/'/E>t/EKt ϳ WKKZ &/Z y>>Ed Ͳ &/Z EKEͲKZ/'/E>t/EKt ϳ &/Z &/Z y>>Ed sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z EKEͲKZ/'/E>t/EKt ϴ &/Z 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϴ &/Z 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϵ &/Z 'KK WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>D/^^/E'WE/E>KtZ^^, ϵ WKKZ 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϵ WKKZ 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϬ WKKZ WKKZ 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϬ WKKZ WKKZ 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϬ &/Z WKKZ 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϭ WKKZ &/Z 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϭ WKKZ &/Z 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϮ &/Z 'KK &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϯ &/Z &/Z WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>D/^^/E'WE/E>KtZ^^, ϭϰ &/Z &/Z 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϱ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϭϱ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϭϲ 'KK 'KK 'KK Ͳ ϭϳ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϭϴ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ZDKs&KZEthE/d>zKhdͲ/EdZ/KZt/EKt ϭϴ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ZDKs&KZEthE/d>zKhdͲ/EdZ/KZt/EKt ϭϵ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϵ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϮϬ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK Ϯϭ 'KK &/Z WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE Ϯϭ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϮϮ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK Ϯϯ 'KK 'KK 'KK sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK Ϯϰ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z Ϯϰ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z Ϯϰ &/Z &/Z WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>D/^^/E'WE/E>KtZ^^, Ϯϰ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z Ϯϰ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z Ϯϰ& &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z Ϯϱ &/Z &/Z WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE Ϯϲ &/Z &/Z WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ZW>ZK<EͬD/^^/E't/EKtWE Ϯϳ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z Ϯϴ WKKZ &/Z WKKZ ͕͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ ^>͗ ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE>'E ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ ϰ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŝŶĚŽǁĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ĂƌĞƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶƚŽŶŽƚĚĂŵĂŐĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚ ǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵ͕ƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ ĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ ^>͗ ϭͬϮΗсϭΖͲϬΗ KKZZ,/>/dd/KE ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 105 ϭϭͬ25ͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϰ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'Ϯ EK /^^h d ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ WZKWK^^KE>s>DK>/d/KEW>E ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ WZKWK^^KE>s>&>KKZW>E ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ ϰ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŝŶĚŽǁĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ĂƌĞƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶƚŽ ŶŽƚĚĂŵĂŐĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵ͕ƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ ϳ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌǁĂůůͬƉĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶƐƚƵĚĨƌĂŵŝŶŐĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϴ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌǁŽŽĚǁĂůůͬĐĞŝůŝŶŐůĂƚŚĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϵ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌǁŽŽĚĚŽŽƌĂŶĚƐĂůǀĂŐĞĨŽƌƌĞƵƐĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘hƐĞĐĂƌĞŶŽƚƚŽĚĂŵĂŐĞĚŽŽƌĂŶĚĚŽŽƌŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞ͘ ϭϬ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŽŽĚƐƚĂŝƌŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƐƚƌŝŶŐĞƌƐ͕ƚƌĞĂĚƐĂŶĚƌŝƐĞƌƐĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ ĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϮ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŐƵƚƚĞƌƐĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŽŽĚďůŽĐŬŝŶŐͬĨƵƌƌŝŶŐĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĞŶĚƐŽĨ ƚŚĞƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐ͘WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ ϭϰ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŝƌŝŶŐ͕ĐŽŶĚƵŝƚ͕ƉŝƉŝŶŐ͕dsĂŶƚĞŶŶĂ͕ĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂůƉĂŶĞů͕ŐĂƐŵĞƚĞƌŽƌ ŽƚŚĞƌƐŝŵŝůĂƌĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŵŽƵŶƚŝŶŐďƌĂĐŬĞƚƐͬŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞ ĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϳ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƉůƵŵďŝŶŐĨŝǆƚƵƌĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŽŝůĞƚƐ͕ďĂƚŚƚƵď͕ĨĂƵĐĞƚƐ͕ŚŽƐĞďŝďƐĂŶĚ ŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŝƚĞŵƐĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 104 ϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐƚŽŽƉĂŶĚƐƚĂŝƌƐĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ ϰ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŝŶĚŽǁĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ĂƌĞƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶƚŽ ŶŽƚĚĂŵĂŐĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵ͕ƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ ϱ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĚŽŽƌĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ĂƌĞƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶƚŽŶŽƚ ĚĂŵĂŐĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵ͕ƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ ϳ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌǁĂůůͬƉĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶƐƚƵĚĨƌĂŵŝŶŐĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϴ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌǁŽŽĚǁĂůůͬĐĞŝůŝŶŐůĂƚŚĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϵ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌǁŽŽĚĚŽŽƌĂŶĚƐĂůǀĂŐĞĨŽƌƌĞƵƐĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘hƐĞĐĂƌĞŶŽƚƚŽĚĂŵĂŐĞĚŽŽƌĂŶĚĚŽŽƌŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞ͘ ϭϬ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŽŽĚƐƚĂŝƌŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƐƚƌŝŶŐĞƌƐ͕ƚƌĞĂĚƐĂŶĚƌŝƐĞƌƐĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ ĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϵ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŽŽĚƐƚĂŝƌŚĂŶĚƌĂŝůƚĂŬŝŶŐĐĂƌĞŶŽƚƚŽĚĂŵĂŐĞďĂůƵƐƚĞƌƐĂŶĚŶĞǁĞů ƉŽƐƚƐͲƐĂůǀĂŐĞĨŽƌƌĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞĂƚŽƉŽƐŝƚĞƐŝĚĞŽĨƐƚĂŝƌ͘ ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 103 ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ Ϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐůĂďŽŶŐƌĂĚĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ ϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐƚŽŽƉĂŶĚƐƚĂŝƌƐĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ ϰ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŝŶĚŽǁĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ĂƌĞƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶƚŽ ŶŽƚĚĂŵĂŐĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵ͕ƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ ϱ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĚŽŽƌĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ĂƌĞƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶƚŽŶŽƚ ĚĂŵĂŐĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵ͕ƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ ϭϮ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŐƵƚƚĞƌƐĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŽŽĚďůŽĐŬŝŶŐͬĨƵƌƌŝŶŐĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĞŶĚƐŽĨ ƚŚĞƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐ͘WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ ϭϱ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚŵƵůƚŝƉůĞƌŽŽĨŝŶŐůĂǇĞƌƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨũĂĐŬĂŶĚƉůƵŵďŝŶŐǀĞŶƚƐ ĚŽǁŶƚŽƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŽŽĚƐŬŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨĚĞĐŬĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨĚĞĐŬĨŽƌ ŶĞǁƌŽŽĨŝŶŐƐǇƐƚĞŵ͘/ĚĞŶƚŝĨǇĂƌĞĂƐŽĨĞǆŝƐŝƚŶŐǁŽŽĚƐŬŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐƚŚĂƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƌĞƉĂŝƌ ŽƌƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶͲŬŝŶĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͘ĂƌĞƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶƚŽŶŽƚĚĂŵĂŐĞďĂƌŐĞƌĂĨƚĞƌƐ͕ ƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐ͕ŽƌĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 102 ϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐƚŽŽƉĂŶĚƐƚĂŝƌƐĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ ϰ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŝŶĚŽǁĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ĂƌĞƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶƚŽŶŽƚĚĂŵĂŐĞ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵ͕ƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ ϲ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ĂƌĞƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶƚŽŶŽƚĚĂŵĂŐĞ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͕ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ͕ĚŽŽƌƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ ϭϭ ĂƌĞĨƵůůǇƌĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƚƵĐĐŽĞǆƚĞƌŝŽƌĨŝŶŝƐŚƚŽƚŚĞĞǆƚĞŶƚƐĚĞĨŝŶĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶƐWůĂŶƐĂŶĚ ůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘hƐĞĐĂƌĞƚŽŶŽƚĚĂŵĂŐĞƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĂŶĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵ͕ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ͕ǁĂůůƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐ͕ ƐƚƵĚĨƌĂŵŝŶŐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϮ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŐƵƚƚĞƌƐĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŽŽĚďůŽĐŬŝŶŐͬĨƵƌƌŝŶŐĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĞŶĚƐŽĨƚŚĞƌĂĨƚĞƌ ƚĂŝůƐ͘WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ ϭϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĚŽǁŶƐƉŽƵƚƐĂŶĚĂƐƐĐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŵŽƵŶƚŝŶŐďƌĂĐŬĞƚƐĂŶĚŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌ ŶĞǁĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϰ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŝƌŝŶŐ͕ĐŽŶĚƵŝƚ͕ƉŝƉŝŶŐ͕dsĂŶƚĞŶŶĂ͕ĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂůƉĂŶĞů͕ŐĂƐŵĞƚĞƌŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƐŝŵŝůĂƌ ĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŵŽƵŶƚŝŶŐďƌĂĐŬĞƚƐͬŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϱ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚŵƵůƚŝƉůĞƌŽŽĨŝŶŐůĂǇĞƌƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨũĂĐŬĂŶĚƉůƵŵďŝŶŐǀĞŶƚƐĚŽǁŶƚŽƚŚĞ ĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŽŽĚƐŬŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨĚĞĐŬĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨĚĞĐŬĨŽƌŶĞǁƌŽŽĨŝŶŐƐǇƐƚĞŵ͘ /ĚĞŶƚŝĨǇĂƌĞĂƐŽĨĞǆŝƐŝƚŶŐǁŽŽĚƐŬŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐƚŚĂƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƌĞƉĂŝƌŽƌƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶͲŬŝŶĚ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͘ĂƌĞƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶƚŽŶŽƚĚĂŵĂŐĞďĂƌŐĞƌĂĨƚĞƌƐ͕ƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐ͕ŽƌĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƚƵĐĐŽ ĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ Ͳ^z^dDEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ tϭ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĞǆƚĞƌŝŽƌǁĂůůǁŝƚŚŶĞǁĞůĂƐƚŽŵĞƌŝĐƉĂŝŶƚŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚŽǀĞƌĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚŽŶůĂƚŚŽǀĞƌƉĂƉĞƌŽǀĞƌϭǆǁŽŽĚǁĂůůƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐŽŶϮǆϰǁŽŽĚƐƚƵĚ ĨƌĂŵŝŶŐĂƚϭϲΗŽ͘Đ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶĚŝŶƐƚĂůůŶĞǁďůŽǁŶŝŶĐĞůůƵůŽƐĞŝŶƐƵůĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚϱͬϴΗŐǇƉƐƵŵďŽĂƌĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĂƚŝŶƐŝĚĞĨĂĐĞǁŝƚŚƚĞǆƚƵƌĞ͕ƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ ƉĞƌƐƉĞĐƐ͘ tϰ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŽŽĚĚŽŽƌĂŶĚƐŝĚĞůŝƚĞƐƚŽďĞƐĐƌĂƉĞĚ͕ƐĂŶĚĞĚĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĨŽƌŶĞǁƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ tϱ EĞǁǁŽŽĚƌĂŝůĂŶĚƐƚŝůĞĐƌĂĨƚŵĂŶƐƐƚǇůĞĞǆƚĞƌŝŽƌĚŽŽƌǁŝƚŚǁŝƚŚĚŝǀŝĚĞĚůŝƚĞďĞůŽǁƚŽƉƌĂŝůͲƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ Zϭ EĞǁϯϬǇĞĂƌůĂƐƐϰŚŝŐŚƉƌŽĨŝůĞĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĂƐƉŚĂůƚƐŚŝŶŐůĞƐŽŶϯϬůďƐĂƐƉŚĂůƚŝŵƉƌĞŐŶĂƚĞĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉĂƉĞƌǁŝƚŚ'ƌĂĐĞŝĐĞĂŶĚǁĂƚĞƌƐŚŝĞůĚĂƚĞĂǀĞƐΘ ǀĂůůĞǇƐǁŝƚŚƐĞĐŽŶĚĂƌǇƵŶĚĞƌůĂǇŵĞŶƚŽŶϭϱͬϯϮΗK^ƌŽŽĨƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐŽŶĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐϭǆǁŽŽĚƐŚŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐ͘ZĞƉĂŝƌŽƌƌĞƉůĂĐĞĂŶǇĚĞƚĞƌŝŽƌĂƚĞĚƐŬŝƉ ƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐƉƌŝŽƌƚŽŝŶƐƚĂůůŝŶŐŶĞǁK^ƌŽŽĨƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞŶĞǁŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌƐĞĚĚƌŝƉĞĚŐĞĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐĂƚďŽƚŚƌĂŬĞĂŶĚĞĂǀĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶĚŝŶƐƚĂůů ŶĞǁZͲϰϵďůŽǁŶͲŝŶŝŶƐƵůĂƚŝŽŶĂƚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĂƚƚŝĐƐƉĂĐĞZĞ͗^ƚƌƵĐƚ͘ ZϮ EĞǁŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚϱΗŚĂůĨƌŽƵŶĚŐƵƚƚĞƌƐǁŝƚŚŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚƐƚĞĞůŚĂŶŐĞƌƐƚŽďĞŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĞǆƉŽƐĞĚϮǆϲƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐĂƚƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨĞĂǀĞƐ͘ Zϰ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐϮǆϴǁŽŽĚďĂƌŐĞƌĂĨƚĞƌƚŽďĞƐĐƌĂƉĞĚ͕ƐĂŶĚĞĚĂŶĚƌĞŚĂďŝůŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚϮͲƉĂƌƚĞƉŽǆǇĨŝůůĞƌĂŶĚŽƌĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŝůŝǌĞĚĂƚĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚĚƌǇƌŽƚ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞ ŶĞǁϭͲĐŽĂƚƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚϮͲĐŽĂƚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ Zϱ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐϮǆϲĞǆƉŽƐĞĚǁŽŽĚƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐƚŽďĞƐĐƌĂƉĞĚ͕ƐĂŶĚĞĚĂŶĚƌĞŚĂďŝůŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚϮͲƉĂƌƚĞƉŽǆǇĨŝůůĞƌĂŶĚŽƌĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŝůŝǌĞĚĂƚĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚĚƌǇƌŽƚ͘ WƌŽǀŝĚĞŶĞǁϭͲĐŽĂƚƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚϮͲĐŽĂƚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ Zϲ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐďƌŝĐŬĐŚŝŵŶĞǇƚŽďĞƌĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚƵƚŝůŝǌŝŶŐƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐďƌŝĐŬƐǁŝƚŚĂŶĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚŵŽƌƚĂƌĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐĂŶĚŵŽƌƚĂƌƚŚĂƚŝƐĐŽŵƉĂƚĂďŝůĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŵŽƌƚĂƌ͘DĂƚĐŚƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŵŽƌƚĂůƚŽŽůũŽŝŶƚƉƌŽĨŝůĞĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚŵĞƚĂůĐĂƉĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚĚƌŝƉĞĚŐĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂǁĞĂƚŚĞƌƚŝŐŚƚƐĞĂů͘;ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐ ĨŝƌĞƉůĂĐĞĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚŝƐĐŚŝŵŶĞǇŝƐƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶŽƵƚŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞͿ ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 101 WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϮϬ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϯͬϮϬϮϬϰ͗ϭϭ͗ϰϴWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ h/>/E'ϭ>sd/KE^Ͳ W>EE/E' ϭϵϭϲ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϮϬϮϬͬϬϮͬϬϯ ϬϮ Dy/DKs>KWDEd &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^ ϬϮϭͬϴΗсϭΖͲϬΗ ^>͗ ϭ h/>/E'ϭͲ ^d>sd/KE ϬϮϭͬϴΗсϭΖͲϬΗ ^>͗ Ϯ h/>/E'ϭͲ EKZd,>sd/KE ϬϮϭͬϴΗсϭΖͲϬΗ ^>͗ ϰ h/>/E'ϭͲ t^dW>>sd/KE EK /^^h d ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 97 ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϮϬ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϮͬϯͬϮϬϮϬϰ͗ϭϭ͗ϭϱWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ h/>/E'ϭ>sd/KE^Ͳ W>EE/E' ϭϵϭϲ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϮϬϮϬͬϬϮͬϬϯ Ϭϭ Dy/DKs>KWDEd &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^ ϬϭϭͬϴΗсϭΖͲϬΗ ^>͗ ϭ h/>/E'ϭͲ ^Khd,>sd/KE ϬϭϭͬϴΗсϭΖͲϬΗ ^>͗ Ϯ h/>/E'ϭͲ t^d>sd/KE ϬϭϭͬϴΗсϭΖͲϬΗ ^>͗ ϯ h/>/E'ϭͲ ^dW>>sd/KE EK /^^h d ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 96 PROVIDED BIKE PARKING Apex Enclosed: 61 Apex Fixed: 6 Haven Enclosed: 28 Haven Fixed: 44 Total: 139 (89, 50) Property line Existing trees Proposed canopy tree Proposed ornamental tree Building 1: Multi-Family Building 44 bikes Existing multi-modal walk Lawn Cottage landscaping ZLWKĠRZHULQJ shrubs, perennials and ornamental grasses Evergreen tree screening Patio area Cottage landscaping ZLWKĠRZHULQJ shrubs, perennials and ornamental grasses 9 Parking Spaces (1 delivery, 5 permit only, 2 guest, 1 ADA) Shared Parking lot for Apex and Haven Apartments PFA Bollard Existing 8’ multi- modal path Existing lot line 16’ EAE & Pedestrian Connection 16’ 10’ 9’ 15’ 26’ 17’ 7’ WEST PROSPECT ROAD 2020.Apartments02.03 Haven 0 10 20 40’ Concept Plan ITEM 5, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 95 tKKͬ^d>&ZDt/d,/s/>/d KZ/'/E> ,KWWZt/EKt tKKͬ^d>&ZDt/d,/s/>/d KZ/'/E> Kh>Ͳ,hE'^^,t/EKt tKK&ZD EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>dhE<EKtE Kh>Ͳ,hE't/EKt s/Ez>&ZD EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>dhE<EKtE Kh>Ͳ,hE't/EKt s/Ez>&ZD EKEͲKZ/'/E> /E^d>>dhE<EKtE Kh>Ͳ,hE't/EKt s/Ez>&ZD t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϳ t^ϴ t^ϱ t^ϱ t^ϱ t^ϱ t^ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϲ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϵ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϵ t^ϵ t^ϵ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϰ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϵ t^ϵ t^Ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϵ t^Ϯ t^ϭϬ t^ϵ t^ϭ t^ϭ t^ϱ t^ϱ t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϵ t^Ϯ t^ϱ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϵ t^ϱ , DhEd/E^ WE hWWZ^^, >KtZ^^, ^/>> ZK<EͬD/^^/E' WE Z'/KEdKDK>/^, η t/EKtd' t/EKt/E^dE &ZD dyd t/EKt^Z/Wd/KE t^η t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE ^hZszEKdͲ ^^,h> WWZKy/Dd&>KKZ>/E EKd^͗ ͻ >>t/EKts/t^/Ed,t/EKt Z,/>/dd/KE^dhzW/dd, ydZ/KZ>sd/KEK&d,t/EKt͘ ͻ &/>sZ/&zd,d>>t/EKt ,ZtZ/^/EtKZ</E'KE/d/KE͘ ͻ &/>sZ/&zydEdK&ZW/Z ZYh/Z&KZ,t/EKt͘ '>/E'WZK>DEKd^͗ Z<ͬdZ/KZd'>/E'Ͳ ^EKdt^Ϯ D/^^/E't/EKtWEͲ ^EKdt^ϯ t/EKt^^,KDW>d>zZh^dͲ sZ/&z/&ZW>DEd/^E^Zz t/EKtKsZEW/EdͲ sZ/&z/&ZW>DEd/^E^^Zz t^ϭ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^Ϯ t^ϯ t^ϭ t^ϭ Ϭ ϭͬϮ Η ϭΗ ϮΗ ϱ ϰ ϯ Ϯ ϭ WZK:d d ZtE ϳϭϮt,>Z^tz^h/d͕ͲϭϬϬ &KZdK>>/E^͕KϴϬϱϮϱ ;ϵϳϬͿϮϮϯͲϭϴϮϬ ǁǁǁ͘ĂůŵϮƐ͘ĐŽŵ WZ/Ed &/>ED͗ ΞĂůŵϮƐϮϬϭϵ EKd&KZKE^dZhd/KE ϭϭͬϮϯͬϮϬϭϵϴ͗Ϯϴ͗ϭϴWD ϬϬϬϬͲWƌŽũĞĐƚͲ^͘ƌǀƚ >W^hD/dd>Ͳ t/EKt Z,/>/dd/KE^dhz ϭϵϭϲ͘ϯ ƵƚŚŽƌ ϭϭͬ25ͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϰ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'ϯ EK /^^h d ^>͗ ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE^,h> t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KEEKd^ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ t^ϭ ^ĐƌĂƉĞĂŶĚƐĂŶĚůŽŽƐĞƉĂŝŶƚĨƌŽŵĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŽŽĚǁŝŶĚŽǁĨƌĂŵĞ͕ƐĂƐŚ͕ĂŶĚŵƵŶƚŝŶƐĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞ ǁŝŶĚŽǁĨŽƌŶĞǁƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ t^Ϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐƌĂĐŬĞĚŽƌĚĞƚĞƌŝŽƌŝĂƚĞĚǁŝŶĚŽǁŐůĂǌŝŶŐƉƵƚƚǇĂŶĚƌĞƉůĂĐĞǁŝƚŚŶĞǁďĞǀĞůĞĚ ǁŝŶĚŽǁŐůĂǌŝŶŐ͘ t^ϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƉĂƌƚŝĂůďƌŽŬĞŶŐůĂƐƐŝĨƐƚŝůůƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂŶĚƌĞƉůĂĐĞǁŝƚŚŶĞǁϭͬϴΗƚŚŝĐŬĐůĞĂƌĨůŽĂƚŐůĂƐƐ ĂŶĚŝŶƐƚĂůůŶĞǁďĞǀĞůĞĚǁŝŶĚŽǁŐůĂǌŝŶŐƉƵƚƚǇ͘ t^ϰ ZĞƉůĂĐĞŵŝƐƐŝŶŐŽƌĚĂŵĂŐĞĚǁŽŽĚǁŝŶĚŽǁĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶͲŬŝŶĚǁŽŽĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞƉƌŝŵĞƌ ĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ t^ϱ WƌĞƉĂƌĞĚƌǇƌŽƚƚĞĚƐƵƌĨĂĐĞĨŽƌŶĞǁϮͲƉĂƌƚĞƉŽǆǇĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂŶƚ͘^ŚĂƉĞ͕ƐĂŶĚ͕ĂŶĚƌĞƉĂŝƌĂƌĞĂĂƐ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŶĞǁƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ t^ϲ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĂůƵŵƵŶƵŵƚƌŝŵĐůĂĚĚŝŶŐŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚŽǀĞƌǁŽŽĚǁŝŶĚŽǁƚƌŝŵ͘WƌĞƉĂƌĞǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵĨŽƌ ŶĞǁĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ t^ϳ WƌŽǀŝĚĞŶĞǁϭǆϰǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵĂƚĞǆƚĞƌŝŽƌƐŝĚĞŽĨǁŝŶĚŽǁƚŽŵĂƚĐŚƚƌŝŵŽŶŽƚŚĞƌǁŝŶĚŽǁƐĂƌŽƵŶĚ ŚŽƵƐĞͲƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ t^ϴ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŝŶĚŽǁŚĞĂĚƚƌŝŵƉŝĞĐĞͲƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŶĞǁϭǆϰǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵƉŝĞĐĞĂŶĚĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŵĂƚĐŚ ŚĞĂĚƚƌŝŵĂƚŽƚŚĞƌǁŝŶĚŽǁŝŶƐƚĂŶĐĞƐͲƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ t^ϵ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŝŶĚŽǁƐƚŽƌŵƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŝƚƐĞŶƚŝƌĞƚǇĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂƐĨŽƌŶĞǁǁŽƌŬ͘ t^ϭϬ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƉĂŝŶƚĞĚǁŝŶĚŽǁƉĂŶĞƐ͕ŐůĂǌŝŶŐ͕ƉůǇǁŽŽĚĐŽǀĞƌďŽĂƌĚƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ ĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐĂƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇƚŽƌĞƐƚŽƌĞĨƵĐƚŝŽŶƚŽĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŝŶĚŽǁͲǀĞƌŝĨǇĞǆƚĞŶƚƐŽĨƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚǁŽƌŬŝŶ ĨŝĞůĚ͘ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE^,h> d' W/Ed KE/d/KE &ZDE^/>> KE/d/KE ^^, KE/d/KE '>/E' WZK>D^ ,ZtZ KsZ>> KE/d/KE KDDEd^ ϭ hE<EKtE y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed Ets/Ez>t/EKtͲsZ/&z/&ZW>DEd/^E Ϯ hE<EKtE y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed Ets/Ez>t/EKtͲsZ/&z/&ZW>DEd/^E ϯ Eͬ y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed Ets/Ez>t/EKtͲsZ/&z/&ZW>DEd/^E ϰ hE<EKtE y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK Ets/Ez>t/EKtͲsZ/&z/&ZW>DEd/^E ϱ hE<EKtE y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK Ets/Ez>t/EKtͲsZ/&z/&ZW>DEd/^E ϲ WKKZ WKKZ &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ sZ/&zydEd^K&ZYh/ZtKZ</E&/> ϳ WKKZ WKKZ &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ sZ/&zydEd^K&ZYh/ZtKZ</E&/> ϴ WKKZ WKKZ &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ sZ/&zydEd^K&ZYh/ZtKZ</E&/> ϴ WKKZ WKKZ WKKZ ͕ sZ/&z/E&/> WKKZ sZ/&zydEd^K&ZYh/ZtKZ</E&/> ϵ &/Z y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ Ͳ y>>>Ed ϭϬ y>>Ed y>>Ed y>>Ed sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ZDKsEZW>^dKZD^ZE ϭϭ y>>Ed y>>Ed y>>Ed Ͳ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed ZDKsEZW>^dKZD^ZE ϭϭ y>>Ed y>>Ed y>>Ed Ͳ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed ZDKsEZW>^dKZD^ZE ϭϭ y>>Ed y>>Ed y>>Ed Ͳ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed ZDKsEZW>^dKZD^ZE ϭϮ y>>Ed &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> 'KK ϭϯ 'KK &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ϭϰ &/Z &/Z &/Z sZ/&z/E&/> &/Z ZDKsEZW>^dKZD^ZE ϭϱ hE<EKtE hE<EKtE WKKZ Ͳ WKKZ t/EKtDzZYh/ZZW>DEd ϭϲ WKKZ WKKZ WKKZ Ͳ WKKZ t/EKtDzZYh/ZZW>DEd ϭϳ WKKZ &/Z &/Z Ͳ &/Z ϭϴ WKKZ hE<EKtE hE<EKtE ͕ Ͳ WKKZ ϭϵ &/Z &/Z &/Z Ͳ &/Z ZDKsEZW>^dKZD^ZE ϮϬ hE<EKtE y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed Ets/Ez>t/EKtͲsZ/&z/&ZW>DEd/^E Ϯϭ hE<EKtE y>>Ed y>>Ed Eͬ sZ/&z/E&/> y>>>Ed Ets/Ez>t/EKtͲsZ/&z/&ZW>DEd/^E ^>͗ ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ t/EKtZ,/>/dd/KE>'E ^>͗ ϭͬϮΗсϭΖͲϬΗ KKZZ,/>/dd/KE ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 65 :t ϭϭͬ25ͬϮϬϭϵ >Wϯ Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'ϯ EK /^^h d ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ ϬϭͲ &/Z^d&>KKZDK>/d/KEW>EͲ >W ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ h/>/E'ϯͲ &/Z^d&>KKZW>EͲ >W ^>͗ E ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗ ϬϬͲ ^DEd&>KKZW>E ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 64 Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'ϯ EK /^^h d >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ ϭ EKZd,>sd/KEͲ DK>/d/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ Ϯ EKZd,>sd/KEͲ WZKWK^ >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ ϯ t^d>sd/KEͲ DK>/d/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϮ ^>͗ ϰ t^d>sd/KEͲ WZKWK^ Ͳ^z^dDEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ tϭ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĞǆƚĞƌŝŽƌǁĂůůǁŝƚŚŶĞǁĞůĂƐƚŽŵĞƌŝĐƉĂŝŶƚŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚŽǀĞƌĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚŽŶůĂƚŚŽǀĞƌƉĂƉĞƌ ŽǀĞƌϭǆǁŽŽĚǁĂůůƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐŽŶϮǆϰǁŽŽĚƐƚƵĚĨƌĂŵŝŶŐĂƚϭϲΗŽ͘Đ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶĚŝŶƐƚĂůůŶĞǁďůŽǁŶŝŶ ĐĞůůƵůŽƐĞŝŶƐƵůĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚϱͬϴΗŐǇƉƐƵŵďŽĂƌĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĂƚŝŶƐŝĚĞĨĂĐĞǁŝƚŚƚĞǆƚƵƌĞ͕ƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚƉĞƌ ƐƉĞĐƐ͘ tϰ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŽŽĚĚŽŽƌĂŶĚƐŝĚĞůŝƚĞƐƚŽďĞƐĐƌĂƉĞĚ͕ƐĂŶĚĞĚĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĨŽƌŶĞǁƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ Zϭ EĞǁϯϬǇĞĂƌůĂƐƐϰŚŝŐŚƉƌŽĨŝůĞĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĂƐƉŚĂůƚƐŚŝŶŐůĞƐŽŶϯϬůďƐĂƐƉŚĂůƚŝŵƉƌĞŐŶĂƚĞĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ƉĂƉĞƌǁŝƚŚ'ƌĂĐĞŝĐĞĂŶĚǁĂƚĞƌƐŚŝĞůĚĂƚĞĂǀĞƐΘǀĂůůĞǇƐǁŝƚŚƐĞĐŽŶĚĂƌǇƵŶĚĞƌůĂǇŵĞŶƚŽŶϭϱͬϯϮΗK^ ƌŽŽĨƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐŽŶĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐϭǆǁŽŽĚƐŚŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐ͘ZĞƉĂŝƌŽƌƌĞƉůĂĐĞĂŶǇĚĞƚĞƌŝŽƌĂƚĞĚƐŬŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐ ƉƌŝŽƌƚŽŝŶƐƚĂůůŝŶŐŶĞǁK^ƌŽŽĨƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞŶĞǁŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌƐĞĚĚƌŝƉĞĚŐĞĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐĂƚďŽƚŚƌĂŬĞĂŶĚ ĞĂǀĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶĚŝŶƐƚĂůůŶĞǁZͲϰϵďůŽǁŶͲŝŶŝŶƐƵůĂƚŝŽŶĂƚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĂƚƚŝĐƐƉĂĐĞZĞ͗^ƚƌƵĐƚ͘ ZϮ EĞǁŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚϱΗŚĂůĨƌŽƵŶĚŐƵƚƚĞƌƐǁŝƚŚŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚƐƚĞĞůŚĂŶŐĞƌƐƚŽďĞŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĞǆƉŽƐĞĚϮǆϲ ƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐĂƚƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨĞĂǀĞƐ͘ Zϯ EĞǁϯΗĚŝĂŵĞƚĞƌƌŽƵŶĚŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚĚŽǁŶƐƉŽƵƚƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚƐƚĞĞůĞůďŽǁƐĂŶĚŵŽƵŶƚŝŶŐ ŚĂŶŐĞƌƐ͘ Zϰ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐϮǆϴǁŽŽĚďĂƌŐĞƌĂĨƚĞƌƚŽďĞƐĐƌĂƉĞĚ͕ƐĂŶĚĞĚĂŶĚƌĞŚĂďŝůŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚϮͲƉĂƌƚĞƉŽǆǇĨŝůůĞƌĂŶĚŽƌ ĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŝůŝǌĞĚĂƚĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚĚƌǇƌŽƚ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞŶĞǁϭͲĐŽĂƚƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚϮͲĐŽĂƚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ Zϳ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐďƌŝĐŬĐŚŝŵŶĞǇǁŝƚŚƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚƚŽƌĞĐĞŝǀĞƐƚƵĐĐŽƉĂƚĐŚŝŶŐĂŶĚƌĞƉĂŝƌƚŽŵĂƚĐŚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƚƵĐĐŽ ĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚŵĞƚĂůĐĂƉĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚĚƌŝƉĞĚŐĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂǁĞĂƚŚĞƌƚŝŐŚƚƐĞĂů͘ ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ Ϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐůĂďŽŶŐƌĂĚĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ ϭϮ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŐƵƚƚĞƌƐĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŽŽĚďůŽĐŬŝŶŐͬĨƵƌƌŝŶŐĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĞŶĚƐŽĨƚŚĞƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐ͘ WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ ϭϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĚŽǁŶƐƉŽƵƚƐĂŶĚĂƐƐĐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŵŽƵŶƚŝŶŐďƌĂĐŬĞƚƐĂŶĚŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁ ĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϰ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŝƌŝŶŐ͕ĐŽŶĚƵŝƚ͕ƉŝƉŝŶŐ͕dsĂŶƚĞŶŶĂ͕ĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂůƉĂŶĞů͕ŐĂƐŵĞƚĞƌŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƐŝŵŝůĂƌĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŵŽƵŶƚŝŶŐďƌĂĐŬĞƚƐͬŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϱ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚŵƵůƚŝƉůĞƌŽŽĨŝŶŐůĂǇĞƌƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨũĂĐŬĂŶĚƉůƵŵďŝŶŐǀĞŶƚƐĚŽǁŶƚŽƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐ ǁŽŽĚƐŬŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨĚĞĐŬĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨĚĞĐŬĨŽƌŶĞǁƌŽŽĨŝŶŐƐǇƐƚĞŵ͘/ĚĞŶƚŝĨǇĂƌĞĂƐŽĨ ĞǆŝƐŝƚŶŐǁŽŽĚƐŬŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐƚŚĂƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƌĞƉĂŝƌŽƌƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶͲŬŝŶĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͘ĂƌĞƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶƚŽ ŶŽƚĚĂŵĂŐĞďĂƌŐĞƌĂĨƚĞƌƐ͕ƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐ͕ŽƌĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϲ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂůĨůƵĞĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐ͕ŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞĂŶĚďƌĂĐŬĞƚƐ͘WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 63 Dy/DKs>KWDEd'ZKhW &KZdK>>/E^͕K ,sEWZdDEd^Ͳ h/>/E'ϯ EK /^^h d >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ Ϯ ^Khd,>sd/KEͲ WZKWK^ >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ ϭ ^Khd,>sd/KEͲ DK>/d/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ ϯ ^d>sd/KEͲ DK>/d/KE >ϭͬϰΗсϭΖͲϬΗWϭ ^>͗ ϰ ^d>sd/KEͲ WZKWK^ Ͳ^z^dDEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ tϭ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĞǆƚĞƌŝŽƌǁĂůůǁŝƚŚŶĞǁĞůĂƐƚŽŵĞƌŝĐƉĂŝŶƚŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚŽǀĞƌĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚŽŶůĂƚŚŽǀĞƌƉĂƉĞƌ ŽǀĞƌϭǆǁŽŽĚǁĂůůƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐŽŶϮǆϰǁŽŽĚƐƚƵĚĨƌĂŵŝŶŐĂƚϭϲΗŽ͘Đ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶĚŝŶƐƚĂůůŶĞǁďůŽǁŶŝŶ ĐĞůůƵůŽƐĞŝŶƐƵůĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚϱͬϴΗŐǇƉƐƵŵďŽĂƌĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĂƚŝŶƐŝĚĞĨĂĐĞǁŝƚŚƚĞǆƚƵƌĞ͕ƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚƉĞƌ ƐƉĞĐƐ͘ tϮ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĞǆƚĞƌŝŽƌǁĂůůǁŝƚŚŶĞǁĞůĂƐƚŽŵĞƌŝĐƉĂŝŶƚŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚŽǀĞƌŶĞǁϯͲĐŽĂƚƉŽƌƚůĂŶĚĐĞŵĞŶƚΘůŝŵĞ ďĂƐĞĚƐƚƵĐĐŽƐǇƐƚĞŵŽǀĞƌĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐůĂƚŚŽǀĞƌĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁĞĂƚŚĞƌƌĞƐŝƐƚĂŶƚƐƚƵĐĐŽƉĂƉĞƌ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶĚŝŶƐƚĂůů ŶĞǁďůŽǁŶŝŶĐĞůůƵůŽƐĞŝŶƐƵůĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚϱͬϴΗŐǇƉƐƵŵďŽĂƌĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĂƚŝŶƐŝĚĞĨĂĐĞǁŝƚŚƚĞǆƚƵƌĞ͕ƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚ ƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚƉĞƌƐƉĞĐƐ͘DĂƚĐŚŶĞǁƐƚƵĐĐŽƚĞǆƚƵƌĞĚĨŝŶŝƐŚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌŽƵŐŚĐĂƐƚŽƌƐƉůĂƚƚĞƌĚĂƐŚ ƐƚƵĐĐŽƚĞǆƚƵƌĞ͘ tϲ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŽŽĚƐĂƐŚǁŝŶĚŽǁƚŽďĞƌĞŚĂďŝůŝƚĂƚĞĚͲƐĞĞǁŝŶĚŽǁƐƚƵĚǇĨŽƌĚĞƚĂŝůĞĚƌĞŚĂďŝůŝƚĂƚŝŽŝŶŶŽƚĞƐ͘ Zϭ EĞǁϯϬǇĞĂƌůĂƐƐϰŚŝŐŚƉƌŽĨŝůĞĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĂƐƉŚĂůƚƐŚŝŶŐůĞƐŽŶϯϬůďƐĂƐƉŚĂůƚŝŵƉƌĞŐŶĂƚĞĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ƉĂƉĞƌǁŝƚŚ'ƌĂĐĞŝĐĞĂŶĚǁĂƚĞƌƐŚŝĞůĚĂƚĞĂǀĞƐΘǀĂůůĞǇƐǁŝƚŚƐĞĐŽŶĚĂƌǇƵŶĚĞƌůĂǇŵĞŶƚŽŶϭϱͬϯϮΗK^ ƌŽŽĨƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐŽŶĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐϭǆǁŽŽĚƐŚŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐ͘ZĞƉĂŝƌŽƌƌĞƉůĂĐĞĂŶǇĚĞƚĞƌŝŽƌĂƚĞĚƐŬŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐ ƉƌŝŽƌƚŽŝŶƐƚĂůůŝŶŐŶĞǁK^ƌŽŽĨƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞŶĞǁŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌƐĞĚĚƌŝƉĞĚŐĞĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐĂƚďŽƚŚƌĂŬĞĂŶĚ ĞĂǀĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶĚŝŶƐƚĂůůŶĞǁZͲϰϵďůŽǁŶͲŝŶŝŶƐƵůĂƚŝŽŶĂƚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĂƚƚŝĐƐƉĂĐĞZĞ͗^ƚƌƵĐƚ͘ ZϮ EĞǁŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚϱΗŚĂůĨƌŽƵŶĚŐƵƚƚĞƌƐǁŝƚŚŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚƐƚĞĞůŚĂŶŐĞƌƐƚŽďĞŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĞǆƉŽƐĞĚϮǆϲ ƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐĂƚƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨĞĂǀĞƐ͘ Zϯ EĞǁϯΗĚŝĂŵĞƚĞƌƌŽƵŶĚŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚĚŽǁŶƐƉŽƵƚƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚƐƚĞĞůĞůďŽǁƐĂŶĚŵŽƵŶƚŝŶŐ ŚĂŶŐĞƌƐ͘ Zϰ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐϮǆϴǁŽŽĚďĂƌŐĞƌĂĨƚĞƌƚŽďĞƐĐƌĂƉĞĚ͕ƐĂŶĚĞĚĂŶĚƌĞŚĂďŝůŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚϮͲƉĂƌƚĞƉŽǆǇĨŝůůĞƌĂŶĚŽƌ ĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŝůŝǌĞĚĂƚĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚĚƌǇƌŽƚ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞŶĞǁϭͲĐŽĂƚƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚϮͲĐŽĂƚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ Zϱ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐϮǆϲĞǆƉŽƐĞĚǁŽŽĚƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐƚŽďĞƐĐƌĂƉĞĚ͕ƐĂŶĚĞĚĂŶĚƌĞŚĂďŝůŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚϮͲƉĂƌƚĞƉŽǆǇĨŝůůĞƌ ĂŶĚŽƌĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŝůŝǌĞĚĂƚĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚĚƌǇƌŽƚ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞŶĞǁϭͲĐŽĂƚƉƌŝŵĞƌĂŶĚϮͲĐŽĂƚƉĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘ Zϳ ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐďƌŝĐŬĐŚŝŵŶĞǇǁŝƚŚƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚƚŽƌĞĐĞŝǀĞƐƚƵĐĐŽƉĂƚĐŚŝŶŐĂŶĚƌĞƉĂŝƌƚŽŵĂƚĐŚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƚƵĐĐŽ ĨŝŶŝƐŚ͘WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌĞĚŵĞƚĂůĐĂƉĨůĂƐŚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚĚƌŝƉĞĚŐĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂǁĞĂƚŚĞƌƚŝŐŚƚƐĞĂů͘ ͲDK>/d/KEEKd^Ͳ <ĞǇsĂůƵĞ <ĞǇŶŽƚĞdĞǆƚ ϭϭ ĂƌĞĨƵůůǇƌĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƚƵĐĐŽĞǆƚĞƌŝŽƌĨŝŶŝƐŚƚŽƚŚĞĞǆƚĞŶƚƐĚĞĨŝŶĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶƐWůĂŶƐĂŶĚ ůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘hƐĞĐĂƌĞƚŽŶŽƚĚĂŵĂŐĞƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĂŶĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚǁŽŽĚƚƌŝŵ͕ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ͕ǁĂůůƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐ͕ƐƚƵĚ ĨƌĂŵŝŶŐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϮ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŐƵƚƚĞƌƐĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŽŽĚďůŽĐŬŝŶŐͬĨƵƌƌŝŶŐĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĞŶĚƐŽĨƚŚĞƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐ͘ WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ ϭϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĚŽǁŶƐƉŽƵƚƐĂŶĚĂƐƐĐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŵŽƵŶƚŝŶŐďƌĂĐŬĞƚƐĂŶĚŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁ ĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϰ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŝƌŝŶŐ͕ĐŽŶĚƵŝƚ͕ƉŝƉŝŶŐ͕dsĂŶƚĞŶŶĂ͕ĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂůƉĂŶĞů͕ŐĂƐŵĞƚĞƌŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƐŝŵŝůĂƌĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŵŽƵŶƚŝŶŐďƌĂĐŬĞƚƐͬŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϱ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚŵƵůƚŝƉůĞƌŽŽĨŝŶŐůĂǇĞƌƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨũĂĐŬĂŶĚƉůƵŵďŝŶŐǀĞŶƚƐĚŽǁŶƚŽƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐ ǁŽŽĚƐŬŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨĚĞĐŬĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌŽŽĨĚĞĐŬĨŽƌŶĞǁƌŽŽĨŝŶŐƐǇƐƚĞŵ͘/ĚĞŶƚŝĨǇĂƌĞĂƐŽĨ ĞǆŝƐŝƚŶŐǁŽŽĚƐŬŝƉƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐƚŚĂƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƌĞƉĂŝƌŽƌƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶͲŬŝŶĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͘ĂƌĞƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶƚŽ ŶŽƚĚĂŵĂŐĞďĂƌŐĞƌĂĨƚĞƌƐ͕ƌĂĨƚĞƌƚĂŝůƐ͕ŽƌĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƚƵĐĐŽĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ϭϲ ZĞŵŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂůĨůƵĞĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐ͕ŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞĂŶĚďƌĂĐŬĞƚƐ͘WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƌĞĂĨŽƌŶĞǁ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĨŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘ ITEM 4, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 62 90 “Breakfast Optimist Club to Sponsor,” Coloradoan, January 14, 1958. 91 “Anita Lois Struble Obituary,” Dignity Memorial, https://www.dignitymemorial.com/obituaries/ft-collins-co/anita- struble-7991471. 92 Charles Struble, Ancestry.com. U.S., Department of Veterans Affairs BIRLS Death File, 1850-2010 [database on- line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 33 Book 1321, Page 580-82. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 32 Coloradoan, June 13, 1941. 64 Building Permit #10589, 129 N. McKinley, Elmer Shultz [sic] and C.J. Wetzler, June 11, 1948, Building Permit Collection, Fort Collins History Connection: An Online Collaboration Between the FCMoD and PRPLD, https://fchc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/bp/id/11496/rec/6g. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 30 50 “Ed Wright Plans New Home,” Fort Collins Courier, March 1, 1920. 1230 W. Oak St., according to the 1922 Fort Collins City Directory. 51 Wright, W. Ed., Biography; “Thanks...” Advertisement, Estes Park Trail, Volume XVIII, No. 30, November 11, 1938. 52 Warranty Deed, W.Ed. Wright to L.C. Moore, December 14, 1922, Book 440, Page 163. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 29 Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, Fort Collins, CO. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 27 N/A Packet Pg. 14