The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08/09/2019 - Planning And Zoning Board - Agenda - Work Session* Work session times are approximate and are subject to change without notice. Conference Room A 281 N. College Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 Jeff Hansen, Chair Jeffrey Schneider, Vice Chair Michael Hobbs Per Hogestad William Whitley Planning and Zoning Hearing will be held on Thursday, August 15, 2019, in City Hall Chambers. Regular Work Session August 9, 2019 281 N. College Avenue – Conference Room A Noon - 2:30 pm TOPICS: PROJECTED TIMES: Consent: 1. July 18, 2019 Hearing Draft Minutes 2. Dutch Bros Project Development Plan (Wray) 12:00 – 12:05 Discussion: 3. Montava Planned Unit Development Overlay ODP180002 (Frickey) 12:05 – 2:05 Policy and Legislation: • (None) Board Topics: • Harmony Gateway Plan Update and Standards and Guidelines (Gloss) • Transportation Board Liaison Update (York) 2:05 – 2:30 Planning and Zoning Board Work Session Agenda Work Session Packet Pg. 1 38'0DVWHU3ODQ 6XPPDU\ -8/< ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 2 0217$9$±38'0$67(53/$1 7KH0RQWDYD±38'0DVWHU3ODQLVDORQJ±WHUPSODQIRUWKHGHYHORSPHQWRIDSSUR[LPDWHO\ DFUHVRIFRQWLJXRXVODQGLQWKH0RXQWDLQ9LVWD6XEDUHDRIWKH&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQV&RORUDGR ³&LW\´ 6833/(0(17$/'2&80(17$7,21 7KHIROORZLQJGRFXPHQWVZHUHVXEPLWWHGWRWKH&LW\DVSDUWRIWKHUHTXLUHGVXEPLWWDOLWHPVIRUWKH 0RQWDYD±38'0DVWHU3ODQDQGDUHRQILOHLQWKH3ODQQLQJ'HSDUWPHQWRIWKH&LW\ DQG DUH UHTXHVWHGWREHLQFRUSRUDWHGLQWRWKH0RQWDYDUHFRUG &RQWH[W'LDJUDP 0DVWHU'UDLQDJH5HSRUW 3UHOLPLQDU\:DWHU'HPDQG0HPRUDQGXP 0DVWHU7UDIILF,PSDFW6WXG\ 3KDVH(QYLURQPHQWDO$VVHVVPHQW 3UHOLPLQDU\6XEVXUIDFH([SORUDWLRQ5HSRUW (FRORJLFDO&KDUDFWHUL]DWLRQ5HSRUW $SSURYHG-XULVGLFWLRQDO'HWHUPLQDWLRQ/HWWHU 5HYLHZ7\SHVFRPSDUHGZLWKFXUUHQW/DQG8VH&RGH 6WDIIUHYLHZFRPPHQWVDQGDSSOLFDQW¶VUHVSRQVHV 0RXQWDLQ9LVWD6XEDUHD3ODQDPHQGPHQWUHTXHVW 0DVWHU6WUHHW3ODQ$PHQGPHQW5HTXHVW /HWWHUVRI,QWHQW 9HVWHG3URSHUW\5LJKWV5HTXHVW 7KH IROORZLQJGRFXPHQWVZHUHSUHSDUHGWRDVVLVWLQWKH&LW\¶V HYDOXDWLRQRI0RQWDYD±38' 0DVWHU3ODQDQGWRIDFLOLWDWHSUHSDUDWLRQDQGHYDOXDWLRQRIIXWXUHSURMHFWGHYHORSPHQWSODQVDQG ILQDOGHYHORSPHQWSODQVZLWKLQWKH0RQWDYD±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ork Session Packet Pg. 4 $SSHQGL[$ WR0RQWDYD38'0DVWHU3ODQ6XPPDU\ 'HYHORSPHQW6WDQGDUGVRIWKH/DQG8VH&RGH 'HYHORSPHQW6WDQGDUGVRIWKH/DQG8VH&RGH 6HF 'HVFULSWLRQ $SSHQGLFHV . $SSHQGL[$ WR38'0DVWHU3ODQ6XPPDU\ 3.2.1 - Landscaping and Tree Protection (K) 8WLOLWLHVDQG7UDIILF Landscape, utility and traffic plans shall be coordinated. The following list sets forth minimum dimension requirements for the most common tree/utility and traffic control device separations. Exceptions to these requirements may occur where utilities or traffic control devices are not located in their standard designated locations, as approved by the Director. Tree/utility and traffic control device separations shall not be used as a means of avoiding the planting of required street trees. (1) Forty (40) feet between shade trees and streetlights. Fifteen (15) feet between ornamental trees and streetlights. (See Figure 2.) )LJXUH 7UHH6WUHHWOLJKW6HSDUDWLRQV *(2) Twenty (20) feet between shade and/or ornamental trees and traffic control signs and devices. (3) Ten (10) feet between trees and water or sewer mains. (4) Six (6) feet between trees and water or sewer service lines. (5) Four (4) feet between trees and gas lines. (6) Street trees on local streets planted within the eight-foot-wide utility easement may conflict with utilities. Additional conduit may be required to protect underground electric lines. * Tree/streetlight separations greater than twenty (20) feet between shade and/or ornamental trees and traffic control signs and devices can be required if determined by the City in connection with a project development plan to be necessary for safe traffic operation ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 6 $SSHQGL[$ WR38'0DVWHU3ODQ6XPPDU\ 3.6.2 - Streets, Streetscapes, Alleys And Easements (A) 3XUSRVH . This Section is intended to ensure that the various components of the transportation network are designed and implemented in a manner that promotes the health, safety and welfare of the City. (B) *HQHUDO6WDQGDUG . Public streets, public alleys, private streets, street-like private drives and private drives shall be designed and implemented in a manner that establishes a transportation network that protects the public health, safety and welfare. Rights-of-way and/or easements for the transportation system shall be sufficient to support the infrastructure being proposed. The transportation network shall clearly identify construction and maintenance responsibilities for the proposed infrastructure. All responsibilities and costs for the operation, maintenance and reconstruction of private streets, street- like private drives and private drives shall be borne by the property owners. The City shall have no obligation to operate, maintain or reconstruct such private streets, street-like private drives and private drives nor shall the City have any obligation to accept such private streets, street-like private drives and private drives. (C) Streets on a project development plan or subdivision plat shall conform to the Master Street Plan where applicable. All streets shall be aligned to join with planned or existing streets. All streets shall be designed to bear a logical relationship to the topography of the land. Intersections of streets shall be at right angles unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (D) Cul-de-sacs shall be permitted only if they are not more than six hundred sixty (660) feet in length and have a turnaround at the end with a diameter of at least one hundred (100) feet. Surface drainage on a cul-de-sac shall be toward the intersecting street, if possible, and if not possible a drainage easement shall be provided from the cul-de-sac. If fire sprinkler systems or other fire prevention devices are to be installed within a residential subdivision, these requirements may be modified by the City Engineer according to established administrative guidelines and upon the recommendation of the Poudre Fire Authority. (E) Except as provided in subsection (D) above for cul-de-sacs, no dead-end streets shall be permitted except in cases where such streets are designed to connect with future streets on abutting land, in which case a temporary turnaround easement at the end of the street with a diameter of at least one hundred (100) feet must be dedicated and constructed. Such turnaround easement shall not be required if no lots in the subdivision are dependent upon such street for access. (F) If residential lots in a subdivision abut an arterial street, no access to individual lots from such arterial street shall be permitted. (G) Lots having a front or rear lot line that abuts an arterial street shall have a minimum depth of one hundred fifty (150) feet. (1) $OWHUQDWLYH&RPSOLDQFH . Upon request by the applicant, the decision maker may approve an alternative lot plan that does not meet the standard of this subsection if the alternative lot plan includes additional buffering or screening that will, in the judgment of the decision maker, protect such lots from the noise, light and other potential negative impacts of the arterial street as well as, or better than, a plan which complies with the standard of this subsection. (2) 3URFHGXUH Alternative lot plans shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the submittal requirements for streets, streetscapes, alleys and easements as set forth in this Section and landscape plans as set forth in Section 3.2.1. The alternative lot plan shall clearly identify and discuss the modifications and alternatives proposed and the ways in which the plan will equally well or better accomplish the purpose of this subsection than would a plan which complies with the standards of this subsection. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 7 (3) 5HYLHZ&ULWHULD To approve an alternative lot plan, the decision maker must first find that the proposed alternative plan accomplishes the purpose of this subsection as well as, or better than, a lot plan which complies with the standard of this subsection. In reviewing the proposed alternative plan, the decision maker shall take into account whether the lot plan provides screening and protection of the lots adjacent to the arterial street from noise, light and other negative impacts of the arterial street equally well or better than a plan which complies with the standard of this subsection. (H) Reverse curves on arterial streets shall be joined by a tangent at least two hundred (200) feet in length. (I) The applicant shall not be permitted to reserve a strip of land between a dedicated street and adjacent property for the purpose of controlling access to such street from such property unless such reservation is approved by the City Engineer and the control of such strip is given to the City. (J) Street right-of-way widths shall conform to the /DULPHU &RXQW\ 8UEDQ $UHD 6WUHHW 6WDQGDUGV as approved and amended by the City Council from time to time by ordinance or resolution. (K) Streetscape design and construction, including medians and parkways, shall conform to the /DULPHU &RXQW\8UEDQ$UHD6WUHHW6WDQGDUGV as approved and amended by the City Council from time to time by ordinance or resolution. Any permits that are required pursuant to the /DULPHU&RXQW\8UEDQ$UHD 6WUHHW6WDQGDUGV shall be obtained by the applicant before the construction of the street, streetscape, sidewalk, alley or other public way (as applicable) is commenced. (L) Public alleys shall be controlled by the following requirements: (1) :KHQ$OORZHG Public alleys in residential subdivisions shall be permitted only when: (a) they are necessary and desirable to continue an existing pattern or to establish a pattern of alleys that will extend over a larger development area, and (b) they are needed to allow access to residential properties having garages or other parking areas situated behind the principal structure and the principal structure is on a residential local street. Public alleys shall also be provided in commercial and industrial areas unless other provisions are made and approved for service access. (2) 'HVLJQ&RQVWUXFWLRQ5HTXLUHPHQWV All public alleys shall be constructed in conformance with the /DULPHU&RXQW\8UEDQ$UHD6WUHHW6WDQGDUGV as adopted by the City Council by ordinance or resolution, except those public alleys within the N-C-L, N-C-M and N-C-B zone districts that do not abut commercially zoned properties and that provide access only for carriage houses and habitable accessory buildings as such terms are described in Article 4. Dead-end alleys shall not be allowed. (M) 3ULYDWH6WUHHWV Private streets shall be controlled by the following requirements: (1) :KHQ$OORZHG Private streets shall be allowed in a development, provided that their function will only be to provide access to property within the development. Private streets shall not be permitted if (by plan or circumstance) such streets would, in the judgment of the City Engineer, attract "through traffic" in such volumes as to render such streets necessary as connections between developments, neighborhoods or other origins and destinations outside of the development plan. (2) 'HVLJQ5HTXLUHPHQWV Designs for private streets shall meet all standards for public streets in accordance with the /DULPHU&RXQW\8UEDQ$UHD6WUHHW6WDQGDUGV, as adopted by the City Council by ordinance or resolution. Optional treatments beyond the minimum city standards, such as landscaped medians or other decorative features, will not be approved unless the City determines that such treatments present no safety risk to the public and that the City's utilities will not incur maintenance or replacement costs for their utilities above normal costs associated with the City's standard design. As with public streets, the design of private streets must be completed by or under the charge of a professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado. The design for all private streets shall be included in the utility plans for the development. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 8 (3) &RQVWUXFWLRQ 5HTXLUHPHQWV The construction of all private streets shall be under the direct supervision of a professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado, who must certify that all improvements for private streets have been completed in accordance with the plans approved by the City. In addition, the construction of private streets shall be subject to inspection by the City Engineer for compliance with city standards established in the /DULPHU&RXQW\8UEDQ$UHD6WUHHW 6WDQGDUGV, as adopted by the City Council by ordinance or resolution, and in accordance with the approved plans for the development. All private streets shall be subject to the same bonding and warranty requirements as are established for public streets. (4) 7UDIILF&RQWURO All traffic control devices for the private street system, such as signs, signals, striping, speed control devices (traffic calming) and speed limits, must meet city standards. All plans for traffic control, including any proposed revisions, must be reviewed and approved by the Traffic Engineer prior to installation thereof. (5) 2SHUDWLRQ0DLQWHQDQFHDQG5HFRQVWUXFWLRQ The developer of a private street system must submit to the City that portion of the covenants, declarations and/or bylaws of the appropriate property owners association which defines the responsibilities for the operation, maintenance and reconstruction of the private street system, the costs of which must be borne by the property owners and not the City. The documents must provide for maintenance, reconstruction, drainage, lighting, landscaping, traffic control devices and any other special conditions. This information must also be shown on the plat and site plan for the development with the added statement that the City has no obligation to perform or pay for repair and maintenance or any obligation to accept the streets as public streets. At the time of recording of the plat, the developer shall also record a notice in the Larimer County, Colorado records showing the location of such street and identifying the property or properties which are burdened with the obligation of operation, maintenance and reconstruction of such street, and affirming that the City has no such obligation, or any obligation to accept such street as a public street. (6) 1DPLQJDQG$GGUHVVLQJ Private streets shall be named and addressed in the same manner as public streets, in accordance with the laws and standards of the City. (7) *DWHG'HYHORSPHQWV Gated street entryways into residential developments are prohibited in accordance with subsection 3.6.3(G). Gated entryways for private streets are also prohibited. (N) 3ULYDWH'ULYHVDQG6WUHHW/LNH3ULYDWH'ULYHV (1) :KHQ$OORZHG (a) Internal access or additional cross-access. Private drives shall be allowed in a development, provided that their function will only be to provide access to property within the development or DGGLWLRQDO cross-access between developments that are also connected by a street(s). Private drives shall not be permitted if (by plan or circumstance) such drives would, in the judgment of the City Engineer, attract "through traffic" in such volumes as to render such drives necessary as connections between developments, neighborhoods or other origins and destinations outside of the development plan. (b) Primary access. A private drive shall be allowed to provide primary access to a development, provided that the drive is in compliance with subparagraph (a) above. (c) Street-Like Private Drives. A street-like private drive shall be allowed as primary access to facing buildings or to parcels internal to a larger, cohesive development plan, or for the purposes of meeting other requirements for streets. Street-like private drives shall be designed to include travel lanes, on-street parking, tree-lined border(s), detached sidewalk(s) and crosswalks. Other features such as bikeways, landscaped medians, corner plazas and pedestrian lighting may be provided to afford an appropriate alternative to a street in the context of the development plan. On-street parking for abutting buildings may be parallel or angled. Head-in parking may only be used in isolated parking situations. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 9 Such street-like private drives must be similar to public or private streets in overall function and buildings shall front on and offer primary orientation to the street-like private drive. Street-like private drives may be used in conjunction with other standards, such as block configuration, orientation to connecting walkways, build-to-lines, or street pattern and connectivity. (d) Neither a private drive nor a street-like private drive shall be permitted if it prevents or diminishes compliance with any other provisions of this Code. (2) 'HVLJQ5HTXLUHPHQWV Private drives shall be designed to meet the following criteria: (a) If any property served by the private drive cannot receive fire emergency service from a public street, then all emergency access design requirements shall apply to the private drive in accordance with Section 3.6.6. An "emergency access easement" must be dedicated to the City for private drives that provide emergency access. (b) Private drives which must comply with Section 3.6.6 for emergency access shall be limited to an overall length of six hundred sixty (660) feet from a single point of access (measured as the fire hose would lay). (c) The design of private drives shall comply with all the standards for (PHUJHQF\$FFHVV as contained in Section 3.6.6. (d) Access locations on public or private streets shall be placed in accordance with City standards. (e) The connection of a private drive with a public street shall be made in accordance with City street standards. (f) If drainage from a private drive is channeled or directed to a public street, such drainage shall be in accordance with City street standards. (3) &RQVWUXFWLRQ 5HTXLUHPHQWV The construction of all private drives shall be under the direct supervision of a professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado, who must certify that all improvements for private drives have been completed in accordance with the plans approved by the City. In addition, the construction of private drives that will serve emergency access purposes shall be inspected by the City Engineer for compliance with city standards and the approved plans in the same manner as is required by the City for public streets. (4) 2SHUDWLRQ0DLQWHQDQFHDQG5HFRQVWUXFWLRQ The developer of a private drive must submit to the City that portion of the covenants, declarations and/or by-laws of the appropriate property owners association which defines the responsibilities for the operation, maintenance and reconstruction of the private drive, the costs of which must be borne by the property owners and not the City. The documents must provide for maintenance, reconstruction, drainage, policing and any other special conditions. This information must also be shown on the plat and site plan for the development with the added statement that the City has no obligation to perform or pay for repair and maintenance or any obligation to accept the private drives as public streets. At the time of recording of the plat, the developer shall also record a notice in the Larimer County, Colorado records showing the location of such drive and identifying the property or properties which are burdened with the obligation of operation, maintenance and reconstruction of such drive, and affirming that the City has no such obligation, nor any obligation to accept such drive as a public street or drive. (5) 1DPLQJ DQG $GGUHVVLQJ Private drives shall be named, if necessary, to comply with the standards for (PHUJHQF\$FFHVV as contained in Section 3.6.6. Addressing of the property shall be assigned by the City in conformance with the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards. (6) *DWHG'HYHORSPHQWV Gated street entryways into residential developments are prohibited in accordance with subsection 3.6.3(G). Gated entryways for private drives are also prohibited. (O) (DVHPHQWV Easements shall be controlled by the following requirements: ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 10 (1) Public and private easements shall be provided on lots for utilities, public access, stormwater drainage or other public purposes as required and approved by the City Engineer. (2) Pedestrian and bicycle paths shall be provided to accommodate safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle movement throughout the subdivision and to and from existing and future adjacent neighborhoods and other development; all such pedestrian and bicycle paths shall be constructed in conformity with the /DULPHU&RXQW\8UEDQ$UHD6WUHHW6WDQGDUGV as adopted by the City Council by ordinance or resolution. (3) Development plans shall incorporate and continue any public access easements so as to connect them to any such easements that exist on abutting properties. (4) The subdivider shall be responsible for adequate provisions to eliminate or control flood hazards associated with the subdivision in accordance with Chapter 10 of the City Code. Agreements concerning stormwater drainage between private parties shall be subject to City review and approval. 2UG1R2UG1R2UG1R 2UG1R²2UG1R2UG1R 2UG1R2UG1R2UG1R 2UG1R2UG1R 2UG1R2UG1R2UG1R025, 2013 2UG1R086, 2014 $SSHQGL[$ WR38'0DVWHU3ODQ6XPPDU\ 3.6.3 - Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards (A) 3XUSRVH. This Section is intended to ensure that the local street system is well designed with regard to safety, efficiency and convenience for automobile, bicycle, pedestrian and transit modes of travel. For the purposes of this Division, "local street system" shall mean the interconnected system of collector and local streets providing access to development from an arterial street. (B) *HQHUDO6WDQGDUG. The local street system of any proposed development shall be designed to be safe, efficient, convenient and attractive, considering use by all modes of transportation that will use the system, (including, without limitation, cars, trucks, buses, bicycles, pedestrians and emergency vehicles). The local street system shall provide multiple direct connections to and between local destinations such as parks, schools and shopping. Local streets must provide for both intra- and inter- neighborhood connections to knit developments together, rather than forming barriers between them. The street configuration within each parcel must contribute to the street system of the neighborhood. (C) 6SDFLQJ RI )XOO 0RYHPHQW &ROOHFWRU DQG /RFDO 6WUHHW ,QWHUVHFWLRQV :LWK $UWHULDO 6WUHHWV . Potentially signalized, full-movement intersections of collector or local streets with arterial streets shall be provided at least every one thousand three hundred twenty (1320) feet or one-quarter (¼) mile along arterial streets, unless rendered infeasible due to unusual topographic features, existing development or a natural area or feature. (D) 6SDFLQJRI/LPLWHG0RYHPHQW&ROOHFWRURU/RFDO6WUHHW,QWHUVHFWLRQV:LWK$UWHULDO6WUHHWV . Additional nonsignalized, potentially limited movement, collector or local street intersections with arterial streets shall be spaced at intervals not to exceed six hundred sixty (660) feet between full movement collector or local street intersections, unless rendered infeasible due to unusual topographic features, existing development or a natural area or feature. The City Engineer may require any limited movement collector or local street intersections to include an access control median or other acceptable access control device. The City Engineer may also allow limited movement intersection to be initially constructed to allow full movement access. (E) 'LVWULEXWLRQRI/RFDO7UDIILFWR0XOWLSOH$UWHULDO6WUHHWV . All development plans shall contribute to developing a local street system that will allow access to and from the proposed development, as well as access to all existing and future development within the same section mile as the proposed development, from at least three (3) arterial streets upon development of remaining parcels within the section mile, unless rendered infeasible by unusual topographic features, existing development or a natural area or feature. The local street system shall allow multi-modal access and multiple routes from each development to existing or planned neighborhood centers, parks and schools, without requiring the use of arterial streets, unless rendered infeasible by unusual topographic features, existing development or a natural area or feature. (F) 8WLOL]DWLRQ DQG 3URYLVLRQ RI 6XE$UWHULDO 6WUHHW &RQQHFWLRQV WR DQG )URP $GMDFHQW 'HYHORSPHQWVDQG'HYHORSDEOH3DUFHOV . All development plans shall incorporate and continue all sub-arterial streets stubbed to the boundary of the development plan by previously approved development plans or existing development. All development plans shall provide for future public street connections to adjacent developable parcels by providing a local street connection spaced at intervals not to exceed six hundred sixty (660) feet along each development plan boundary that abuts potentially developable or redevelopable land. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 12 (G) *DWHG'HYHORSPHQWV Gated street entryways into residential developments shall be prohibited. (H) $OWHUQDWLYH &RPSOLDQFH Upon request by an applicant, the decision maker may approve an alternative development plan that may be substituted in whole or in part for a plan meeting the standards of this Section. (1) 3URFHGXUH . Alternative compliance development plans shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with submittal requirements for plans as set forth in this Section. The plan and design shall clearly identify and discuss the alternatives proposed and the ways in which the plan will better accomplish the purpose of this Section than would a plan which complies with the standards of this Section. (2) 5HYLHZ &ULWHULD To approve an alternative plan, the decision maker must first find that the proposed alternative plan accomplishes the purposes of this Division equally well or better than would a plan and design which complies with the standards of this Division, and that any reduction in access and circulation for vehicles maintains facilities for bicycle, pedestrian and transit, to the maximum extent feasible. In reviewing the proposed alternative plan, the decision maker shall take into account whether the alternative design minimizes the impacts on natural areas and features, fosters nonvehicular access, provides for distribution of the development's traffic without exceeding level of service standards, enhances neighborhood continuity and connectivity and provides direct, sub-arterial street access to any parks, schools, neighborhood centers, commercial uses, employment uses and Neighborhood Commercial Districts within or adjacent to the development from existing or future adjacent development within the same section mile. 2UG1R2UG1R2UG1R 2UG1R $SSHQGL[$ WR38'0DVWHU3ODQ6XPPDU\ 3.6.4 - Transportation Level of Service Requirements (A) 3XUSRVH In order to ensure that the transportation needs of a proposed development can be safely accommodated by the existing transportation system, or that appropriate mitigation of impacts will be provided by the development, the project shall demonstrate that all adopted level of service (LOS) standards will be achieved for all modes of transportation as set forth in this Section 3.6.4. (B) *HQHUDO6WDQGDUG All development plans shall adequately provide vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle facilities necessary to maintain the adopted transportation level of service standards. The vehicular level of service standards are those contained in Table 4-3 of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS). The bicycle and pedestrian level of service standards are those contained in Part II of the City of Fort Collins Multi-modal Transportation Level of Service Manual. Mitigation measures for levels of service that do not meet the standards are provided in Section 4.6 of LCUASS. No Transit level of service standards will be applied for the purposes of this Section. Notwithstanding the foregoing, adopted level of service standards need not be achieved where the necessary improvements to achieve such standards are not reasonably related and proportional to the impacts of the development. In such cases, the Director may require improvements or a portion thereof that are reasonably related and proportional to the impacts of the development or the requirement may be varied or waived pursuant to LCUASS Section 4.6. (C) 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ ,PSDFW 6WXG\ 1RPLQDO ,PSDFW. In order to identify those facilities that are necessary in order to comply with these standards, development plans may be required to include the submittal of a Transportation Impact Study, to be approved by the Traffic Engineer, consistent with the Transportation Impact Study guidelines as established in LCUASS Chapter 4 . Should a Transportation Impact Study not be required pursuant to LCUASSS Chapter 4, a proposed development shall be deemed to have a nominal impact and shall not be subject to the transportation level of service requirements described in this Section 3.6.4. 2UG1R2UG1R109, 2018 $SSHQGL[$ 7R38'0DVWHU3ODQ6XPPDU\ 3.7.3 - Adequate Public Facilities (A) 3XUSRVH The purpose of the adequate public facilities (APF) management system is to establish an ongoing mechanism which ensures that public facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrently with the impacts of such development. (B) $SSOLFDELOLW\ This Section shall apply to all development in the City. (C) $3)0DQDJHPHQW6\VWHP (1) $3)0DQDJHPHQW6\VWHP(VWDEOLVKHG In order to implement the City's Principles and Policies, the adequate public facilities management system ("APF management system") is hereby established. The APF management system is incorporated into and shall be part of the development review procedures as well as the process for issuance of Building Permits. (2) *HQHUDO5HTXLUHPHQWV The approval of all development shall be conditioned upon the provision of adequate public facilities and services necessary to serve new development. No Building Permit shall be issued unless such public facilities and services are in place, or the commitments described in subparagraph (E)(1)(a)(2) below have been made, or with respect to transportation facilities, a variance under LCUASS Section 4.6.7 or an alternative mitigation strategy under LCUASS Section 4.6.8 has been approved. Under this APF management system, the following is required: (a) The City shall adopt and maintain level of service standards for the following public facilities: transportation, water, wastewater, storm drainage, fire and emergency services, electrical power and any other public facilities and services required by the City. (b) No site specific development plan or Building Permit shall be approved or issued in a manner that will result in a reduction in the levels of service below the adopted level of service standards for the affected facility, except as expressly permitted under this Section 3.7.3 (and the referenced provisions of LCUASS). (D) /HYHORI6HUYLFH6WDQGDUGV For the purpose of review and approval of new development and the issuance of Building Permits, the City hereby adopts the following level of service standards for the public facilities and services identified below: (1) 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ (a) All development must have access to the Improved Arterial Street Network or to a street for which funds have been appropriated to fund improvement as an arterial street as more specifically required in Division 3.3.2, Subdivision Improvements, (F) Off-site Public Access Improvements. (b) Except as provided in subsection (E)(1) below, all development shall meet or exceed the following transportation level of services standards: 1. The vehicular level of service standards for overall intersection level of service standards contained in Table 4-3 of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS). Alternative mitigation strategies are provided in LCUASS Section 4.6.8 2. The bicycle and pedestrian level of service standards are contained in Part II of the City of Fort Collins Multi-modal Transportation Level of Service Manual. Variances for levels of service that do not meet the standards are provided in LCUASS Section 4.6.7. 3. No transit level of service standards contained in Part II of the Multi-modal Transportation Manual will be applied for the purposes of this Section. (c) If any off-site improvements are required by the standards contained in this Section, repayments for the costs of such improvements shall be provided to the developer in accordance with the provisions of 3.3.2(F)(2). ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 15 (2) :DWHU All development shall provide adequate and functional lines and stubs to each lot as required by the current City or special district, as applicable, design criteria and construction standards. (3) :DVWHZDWHU All development shall provide adequate and functional mains and stubs to each lot as required by the current City or special district, as applicable, design criteria and construction standards. (4) 6WRUP'UDLQDJH All development shall provide storm drainage facilities and appurtenances as required by Sections 26-544 and 10-37 of the Municipal Code and by all current City storm drainage master plans, design criteria and construction standards. (5) )LUHDQG(PHUJHQF\6HUYLFHV All development shall provide sufficient fire suppression facilities as required by the Fire Code. (6) (OHFWULFDO3RZHU6HUYLFH All development shall have service provided as described in the (OHFWULF &RQVWUXFWLRQ3ROLFLHV3UDFWLFHVDQG3URFHGXUHV , and the (OHFWULF6HUYLFH5XOHVDQG5HJXODWLRQV of the Fort Collins Electric Utility. (E) 0LQLPXP5HTXLUHPHQWVIRU$GHTXDWH3XEOLF)DFLOLWLHV (1) The City's APF management system shall ensure that public facilities and services to support development are available concurrently with the impacts of development. In this regard, the following standards shall be used to determine whether a development meets or exceeds the minimum requirements for adequate public facilities: (a) For transportation facilities, at a minimum, the City shall require that, at the time of issuance of any Building Permit issued pursuant to a site specific development plan, all necessary facilities and services, as described in Section (D)(1) above, are either: 1. in place and available to serve the new development in accordance with the development agreement, or 2. funding for such improvements has been appropriated by the City or provided by the developer in the form of either cash, nonexpiring letter of credit, or escrow in a form acceptable to the City. (b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to improvements required to maintain the applicable transportation facilities' level of service where, as determined by the Director, such improvements are not reasonably related to and proportional to the impacts of the development or currently desired by the City, a Building Permit may be issued pursuant to a site specific development plan provided the developer has: 1. Agreed in the development agreement to install or fund improvements, or a portion thereof, that are reasonably related and proportional to the impacts of the development on the affected transportation facility or facilities; or 2. Obtained a variance regarding the affected transportation facility or facilities under LCUASS Section 4.6.7; or 3. Agreed in the development agreement to implement an alternative mitigation strategy as defined by LCUASS Section 4.6.8, or portion thereof, to adequately mitigate the reasonably related and proportional impacts of the development on the affected transportation facility or facilities; or 4. Funding for such improvements has been appropriated by the City or provided by the developer in the form of either cash, nonexpiring letter of credit, or escrow in a form acceptable to the City. (c) For water and wastewater facilities, at a minimum, the City shall require that, at the time of issuance of any building permit issued pursuant to a site-specific development plan, all necessary facilities and services, as described in Section (D)(2) and (3) above, are in place and available to serve the new development in accordance with the approved utility plan and development agreement for the development. (d) For storm drainage facilities, the City shall require that all necessary facilities and services, as described in Section (D)(4) above, are in place and available to serve the new ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 16 development in accordance with the approved drainage and erosion control report, utility plans and development agreement for such development. The timing of installation of such facilities and service shall be as follows: 1. Where multiple building permits are to be issued for a project, twenty-five (25) percent of the building permits and certificates of occupancy may be issued prior to the installation and acceptance of the certification of the drainage facilities. Prior to the issuance of any additional permits, the installation and acceptance of the certification of the drainage facilities shall be required. 2. For projects involving the issuance of only one (1) building permit and certificate of occupancy, the installation and acceptance of the certification of the drainage facilities shall be required prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. (e) For fire and emergency services, at a minimum, the City shall require that, at the time of issuance of any building permit issued pursuant to a site-specific development plan, all necessary facilities and services, as described in Section (D)(5) above, are in place and available to serve the site within the new development where the building is to be constructed in accordance with the Fire Code and the development agreement. (f) For electric power facilities, the following minimum requirements shall apply: 1. For residential development: The developer must coordinate the installation of the electric system serving the development with the City's electric utility. In addition, each application for a building permit within the development must show the name of the development, its address, each lot or building number to be served, and the size of electric service required. The size of electric service shall not exceed that originally submitted to the electric utility for design purposes. Costs for installation of the electric service line to the meter on the building will be payable upon the issuance of each building permit. 2. For Commercial/Industrial Development: The following documents/information shall be provided to the City's electric utility with each application for a building permit: a. an approved and recorded final plat; b. the final plan (two [2] copies); c. the utility plan; d. a one-line diagram of the electric main entrance; e. a Commercial Service Information Form (C-1 form) completed by the developer/ builder for each service, and approved by the electric utility (Blank forms are available at the Electric Utility Engineering Department, 970-221-6700); f. the transformer location(s), as approved by the electric utility; g. the name and address of the person responsible for payment of the electric development charges; and h. the name, of the development, building address and lot or building number. 3. Compliance with Administrative Regulations: The developer shall also comply with all other administrative regulations and policies of the electric utility, including, without limitation, the (OHFWULF&RQVWUXFWLRQ3ROLFLHV3UDFWLFHVDQG3URFHGXUHV and the (OHFWULF 6HUYLFH5XOHVDQG5HJXODWLRQV , copies of which may be obtained from the electric utility. (F) 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ$3)([FHSWLRQ 1RPLQDO,PSDFW For the purpose of the transportation APF requirements contained in this Section, a proposed development shall be deemed to have a nominal impact and shall not be subject to the APF requirements for transportation if the development proposal is not required to complete a Traffic Impact Study per the requirements in Chapter 4 - Transportation Impact Study of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards. 2UG1R2UG1R109, 2018 $SSHQGL[$ WR38'0DVWHU3ODQ6XPPDU\ 3.8.7 - Signs 3.8.7.1 - Permanent Signs (A) *HQHUDO (1) 6LJQV3HUPLWWHG Permanent signs shall be permitted in the various zone districts as accessory uses in accordance with the regulations contained in this Section. The regulations contained in this Section 3.8.7.1 apply to permanent signs while temporary signs are regulated under Section 3.8.7.2 unless specifically provided herein. (2) 3URKLELWHG3HUPDQHQW6LJQV Rooftop signs and all other signs which project above the fascia wall, portable signs, revolving and rotating signs, inflatable signs, and wind-driven signs (except flags in compliance with this Section 3.8.7.1) shall be prohibited in all zone districts. (3) 1RQFRQIRUPLQJ6LJQV (a) Existing signs which were erected without a permit and which, although legally permissible at the time they were erected, have become nonconforming because of subsequent amendments to this Code must be brought into conformance with the provisions of this Section, as amended, within ninety (90) days of the effective date of the amendment which caused the nonconformity. (b) Existing on-premise signs for which a sign permit was issued pursuant to the previous provisions of this Code, and which have become nonconforming because of an amendment to this Code, shall be brought into conformance with the provisions of this Section 3.8.7.1 within the period of time specified in the ordinance containing the amendment which causes the nonconformity. In determining such period of time, the City Council shall consider the length of time since the last Code change affecting that same category of signs as well as the cost of bringing the signs into compliance. During the period of time that the signs may remain nonconforming, such signs shall be maintained in good condition and no such sign shall be: 1. structurally changed to another nonconforming sign, although its content may be changed; 2. structurally altered in order to prolong the life of the sign, except to meet safety requirements; 3. altered so as to increase the degree of nonconformity of the sign; 4. enlarged; 5. continued in use if a change of use occurs as defined in the zoning ordinance, or if the premises promoted by the sign comes under new ownership or tenancy and such sign is proposed to be remodeled, repainted or otherwise changed for the purpose of displaying the new name or other new identification of the premises; or 6. re-established after damage or destruction if the estimated cost of reconstruction exceeds fifty (50) percent of the appraised replacement cost. (c) Except as provided in subsection (d) below, all existing nonconforming signs located on property annexed to the City shall be removed or made to conform to the provisions of this Article no later than seven (7) years after the effective date of such annexation; provided, however, that during said seven-year period, such signs shall be maintained in good condition and shall be subject to the same limitations contained in subparagraphs (b)(1) through (b)(6) above. This subsection shall not apply to off-premises signs which are within the ambit of the just compensation provisions of the Federal Highway Beautification Act and the Colorado Outdoor Advertising Act. (d) All existing signs with flashing, moving, blinking, chasing or other animation effects not in conformance with the provisions of this Article and located on property annexed to the City ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 18 after November 28, 1971, shall be made so that such flashing, moving, blinking, chasing or other animation effects shall cease within sixty (60) days after such annexation, and all existing portable signs, vehicle-mounted signs, banners and pennants located on property annexed to the City after November 28, 1971, shall be removed or made to conform within sixty (60) days after such annexation. (B) $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (1) 3HUPLW5HTXLUHG([FHSWLRQV (a) The erection, remodeling, reface, or removal of any permanent sign shall require a permit from the Director, except that no permit shall be required for the erection, remodeling or removal of any of the following signs: 1. Signs that are required by law at the minimum size required, including but not limited to address signs that are required by the applicable Fire Code; 2. One (1) attached sign of any type per building elevation or entrance (whichever provides for more signs on an elevation), provided that the sign does not exceed two (2) square feet in sign area; 3. Three (3) or fewer flags per property, or group of properties that were planned or developed with shared pedestrian or vehicle access, hung separately or together from a rigid, straight, building or ground-mounted flagpole, or flagpoles, and where no flag exceeds thirty-two (32) square feet in area; 4. Signs that are less than one (1) square foot in sign area that are attached to machines, equipment, fences, gates, walls, gasoline pumps, public telephones, utility cabinets, and other such structures, provided that no more than two (2) of such signs are spaced less than ten (10) feet apart, or such signs are not visible from public rights-of-way; and 5. Window signs that are less than six (6) square feet. (b) All sign permit applications shall be accompanied by detailed drawings indicating the dimensions, location and engineering of the particular sign, plat plans when applicable, and the applicable processing fee. (2) 3HUPLW3URFHVVLQJ The Director shall review the sign permit application within two (2) business days to determine if it is complete. If it is complete, the Director shall approve or deny the application within three (3) business days after such determination. If it is incomplete, the Director shall cause the application to be returned to the applicant within one (1) business day of the determination, along with written reasons for the determination of incompleteness. (C) 6WDQGDUGVDQG/LPLWDWLRQV (1) /LPLWDWLRQVIRU5HVLGHQWLDO'LVWULFWVDQG8VHV Signs in the N-C-L, N-C-M, U-E, R-F, R-L, L-M-N, M-M-N, H-M-N, N-C-B, R-C and P-O-L Districts may include and shall be limited to the following: (a) one (1) sign per public vehicular entry to a multi-family development or residential subdivision, provided such sign does not exceed thirty-five (35) square feet in area per face or six (6) feet in height, and has only indirect illumination When such signs are placed on subdivision entry wall structures, only the sign face shall be used to calculate the size of the sign; (b) one (1) detached or attached sign per nonresidential use, provided such sign does not exceed thirty-five (35) square feet in area per face or eight (8) feet in height (for detached signs), and has only indirect illumination; (c) one (1) detached or attached sign per single-family or duplex building with lot frontage on an arterial street, provided that such sign does not exceed four (4) square feet in area per face or five (5) feet in height, and has no illumination. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 19 (D) *HQHUDO/LPLWDWLRQVIRU1RQUHVLGHQWLDO'LVWULFWVDQG8VHV Signs in the D, R-D-R, C-C, C-C-N, C-C-R, C-G, C-S, N-C, C-L, H-C, E and I districts, or for any institutional/civic/public, business, commercial or industrial use in a mixed-use district shall be limited to the following: (1) such signs as are permitted in the R-L District; (2) one (1) flag larger than thirty-two (32) square feet in area and within the permitted sign area allowance for the property, provided no other flags are displayed; (3) flush wall signs, projecting wall signs, window signs, freestanding signs and ground signs, provided that the placement and use of all such signs shall be governed by and shall be within the following limitations: (a) For the first two hundred (200) feet in building frontage length, the maximum sign area permitted shall be equal to two (2) square feet of sign area for each linear foot of building frontage length. (b) For that portion of a building frontage which exceeds two hundred (200) feet in length, the maximum sign area permitted shall be equal to one (1) square foot of sign area for each linear foot of building frontage length over such two hundred (200) feet. The sign area permitted hereunder shall be in addition to the sign area permitted under (3)(a) above. (c) In no event shall the total sign allowance for any property be less than one (1) square foot of sign allowance for each linear foot of lot frontage. (d) In no event shall more than three (3) street or building frontages be used as the basis for calculating the total sign allowance as permitted in subsections (3)(a) and (3)(c) above, inclusive. (e) For flush wall signs consisting of framed banners, all banners shall be sized to fit the banner frame so that there are no visible gaps between the edges of the banner and the banner frame. (4) For the purpose of this Section, the sign allowance shall be calculated on the basis of the length of the one (1) building frontage which is most nearly parallel to the street it faces. If a building does not have frontage on a dedicated public street, the owner of the building may designate the one (1) building frontage which shall be used for the purpose of calculating the sign allowance. If the only building frontage which fronts on a dedicated street is a wall containing no signs, the property owner may designate another building frontage on the building on the basis of which the total sign allowance shall be calculated, provided that no more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total sign allowance permitted under this Article may be placed on frontage other than the building fascia which was the basis for the sign allowance calculation. In all other cases, the sign allowance for a property may be distributed in any manner among its building and/or street frontages except that no one (1) building or street frontage may contain more sign area than one hundred (100) percent of the sign area provided for by (3)(a) through (3)(c) above, inclusive. (5) In addition to the sign allowance calculation described in paragraph (4) above, a building located in the Downtown (D) Zone District that abuts an alley which has been improved pursuant to the Downtown Development Authority's Alley Enhancement Project may be allowed one (1) flush wall sign not to exceed six (6) square feet, or one (1) projecting wall sign not to exceed six (6) square feet per side, on the rear wall of such building, provided that a public entrance to the building exists in said wall. (E) /LPLWDWLRQV IRU 1RQUHVLGHQWLDO 'LVWULFWV DQG 1RQUHVLGHQWLDO 8VHV LQ WKH 5HVLGHQWLDO 1HLJKERUKRRG6LJQ'LVWULFW There is hereby established a "Residential Neighborhood Sign District" for the purpose of regulating signs for nonresidential uses in certain geographical areas of the City which may be particularly affected by such signs because of their predominantly residential use and character. The boundaries of the "Residential Neighborhood Sign District" shall be shown on a map which shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk. Any amendments to this map shall be made in the same manner as amendments to the Zoning Map of the City, as provided in Article 2. The following provisions shall only apply to project development plans proposed in the Neighborhood ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 20 Commercial Districts and neighborhood service centers, convenience shopping centers, business service uses and auto-related and roadside commercial uses in the "Residential Neighborhood Sign District" which are developed on or after January 15, 1993. In addition, all such provisions, except paragraphs (14) and (15) below, shall apply to signs in neighborhood service centers, neighborhood commercial districts, convenience shopping centers, business service uses and auto-related and roadside commercial uses in the "Residential Neighborhood Sign District" which were developed prior to the effective date of this Code, whenever such signs are erected or remodeled pursuant to a permit after January 15, 1993. (1) Signs regulated under this Section shall generally conform to the other requirements of this Section, except that when any of the following limitations are applicable to a particular sign, the more restrictive limitation shall apply. (2) Signs regulated under this Section shall also conform to any locational requirements imposed by the decision maker as a condition of the approval of the development plan. (3) No sign shall project more than twelve (12) inches beyond the building fascia. Under-canopy signs which are perpendicular to the face of the building shall be exempted from this requirement, except that they shall be limited to four (4) square feet in area per face. (4) Freestanding or ground signs shall comply with the following requirements with respect to size, number and height: 8VH 0D[LPXPDUHDSHU VLJQIDFH VI VTXDUHIHHW 8VH 0D[LPXP&DELQHWRU,QGLYLGXDO /HWWHU+HLJKW $OO,QVWLWXWLRQDO%XVLQHVVDQG&RPPHUFLDO8VHV1RW 2WKHUZLVH6SHFLILHGLQWKLV7DEOH &RQYHQLHQFH6KRSSLQJ&HQWHU 1HLJKERUKRRG6HUYLFH&HQWHU 1HLJKERUKRRG&RPPHUFLDO'LVWULFW * Any individual tenant space exceeding forty-five thousand (45,000) square feet in floor area shall be permitted one (1) flush wall sign with individual letters not to exceed fifty-four (54) inches in height. The maximum cabinet height shall be fifty-four (54) inches in height. (9) If signs are illuminated, only internal illumination shall be permitted. This requirement shall not apply to freestanding or ground signs. (10) The length of any flush wall sign for an individual tenant space shall be limited to seventy-five (75) percent of the width of the tenant storefront, but no sign shall exceed forty (40) feet in length; provided, however, that any individual tenant space exceeding forty-five thousand (45,000) square feet in floor area shall be permitted one (1) flush wall sign not exceeding fifty-five (55) feet in length. Each tenant space shall be allowed one (1) such flush wall sign on each exterior building wall directly abutting the tenant space. In the event that a tenant space does not have a directly abutting exterior wall, one (1) sign not exceeding thirty (30) square feet may be erected on an exterior wall of the building for the purpose of identifying that tenant space. (11) The location of any flush wall sign shall be positioned to harmonize with the architectural character of the building(s) to which they are attached, including, but not limited to, any projection, relief, cornice, column, change of building material, window or door opening. Flush wall signs shall align with other such signs on the same building. (12) No illuminated sign visible from or within three hundred (300) feet of any property which contains an existing or approved residential use or is zoned for residential use, may be illuminated between the hours of 11:00 p.m. (or one-half [½] hour after the use to which it is pertains is closed, whichever is later) and 6:00 a.m.; provided, however, that this time limitation shall not apply to any lighting which is used primarily for the protection of the premises or for safety purposes or any signage which is separated from a residential use by an arterial street. For the purposes of this subsection, the term "approved" shall mean having current project development plan or final plan approval. (13) One (1) flush wall sign or under-canopy sign per street frontage, not to exceed twelve (12) square feet in area, shall be permitted on or under the fascia of a canopy covering an area used by motor vehicles (including but not limited to service station canopies, canopies over drive-in or drive-through facilities, etc.) (14) For the first two hundred (200) feet in building frontage length in a neighborhood service center, the maximum sign area permitted shall be equal to one and one-quarter (1¼) square feet for each linear foot of building frontage length. For that portion of a building frontage which exceeds two hundred (200) feet in length, the maximum sign area permitted shall be equal to two-thirds (⅔) foot for each linear foot of building frontage length over such two hundred (200) feet. (15) For the first two hundred (200) feet in building frontage length in a convenience shopping center, or any other business or commercial use that is not a neighborhood service center or neighborhood commercial district, the maximum sign area permitted shall be equal to one (1) square foot for each linear foot of building frontage length. For that portion of a building frontage ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 22 which exceeds two hundred (200) feet in length, the maximum sign area permitted shall be equal to one-half (½) foot for each linear foot of building frontage over such two hundred (200) feet. (16) Window signs shall cover no more than twenty-five (25) percent of the surface area of the window or door in which such signs are placed. Temporary window signs shall not be allowed above the first story of a building. A window sign shall be considered to be a temporary window sign if it is displayed in the same window or door, or same approximate location outside of a window or door, for no more than thirty (30) calendar days within a calendar year. Changes in the message displayed on such sign shall not affect the computation of the thirty-day period of time provided for herein. (F) 0HDVXUHPHQWRI6LJQV (1) The area of signs with regular geometric shapes shall be measured using standard mathematical formulas. Regular geometric shapes shall include, but not be limited to, squares, rectangles, triangles, parallelograms, circles, ellipses or combinations thereof. (2) The area of signs with irregular shapes or of individual letter signs shall be the entire area within a single continuous perimeter of not more than eight (8) straight lines enclosing the extreme limits of the sign. (3) The total measured area of a sign shall include the area of all writing, representation, lines, emblems or figures contained within all modules, together with any air space, material or color forming an integral part or background of the display if used to differentiate such sign from the backdrop or structure against which it is placed. (4) The total surface area of all sign faces shall be counted and considered to be part of the maximum total sign area allowance. (5) The area of all freestanding and ground signs shall include the area of the sign face(s) as calculated in subsections (1) through (4) above, together with any portion of the sign structure which exceeds one and one-half (1½) times the area of the sign face(s). (G) )UHHVWDQGLQJDQG*URXQG6LJQ5HTXLUHPHQW (1) Ground signs which exceed forty-two (42) inches in height, and freestanding signs which do not maintain free air space between a height of forty-two (42) inches and seventy-two (72) inches above the abutting street elevation, shall be set back from the right-of-way line a distance as established in the sight distance triangle table contained in this subsection. A freestanding sign shall not be construed to have free air space if such sign has a base, the width of which exceeds fifty (50) percent of the width of its face or three (3) feet, whichever is smaller. In addition, freestanding and ground signs shall not be located closer to the right-of-way line than allowed in the tables below that apply to such signs. 6LJKW'LVWDQFH7ULDQJOH6HWEDFNV 6HH)LJXUH )LJXUH 6DIH'LVWDQFH7ULDQJOH6HWEDFNV Note: All "X" distances shall be fifteen (15) feet measured perpendicular from the project flowline of the intersecting street. For explanation of distances, see the diagram following. These distances are typical sight distance triangles to be used under normal conditions and may be modified by the Director of Engineering in order to protect the public safety and welfare in the event that exceptional site conditions necessitate such modification. 5HTXLUHPHQWVIRU)UHHVWDQGLQJ6LJQV (See Accompanying Text Below) 'LVWDQFHIURP VWUHHWULJKWRI ZD\OLQH IHHW 5HTXLUHPHQWVIRU*URXQG6LJQV (See Accompanying Text Below) 'LVWDQFHIURP VWUHHWULJKW RIZD\OLQH IHHW sign is physically oriented to the drive-in station. The square footage of such sign shall be exempted from the total allowed for the property. (11) All supporting structures of ground signs shall be of the same or similar materials or colors of the associated building(s) which house the businesses or activities advertised on the sign. (12) When electrical service is provided to freestanding signs or ground signs, all such electrical service shall be underground. (13) Freestanding signs (pole signs) shall contain no more than thirty (30) percent (forty [40] percent if located within the site distance triangle as described in paragraph 3.8.7.1(G)(1) above) free air space between the top of the sign and the ground, vertically and between the extreme horizontal limits of the sign extended perpendicular to the ground. A base or pole cover provided to satisfy this requirement shall be integrally designed as part of the sign by use of such things as color, material and texture. Freestanding signs that existed prior to December 30, 2011, and that do not comply with this regulation shall be removed or brought into compliance by December 31, 2019, provided that such signs otherwise comply with subparagraph (A)(3)(b) of this Section. (H) 3URMHFWLQJ6LJQV (1) Signs projecting over private property shall not project more than six (6) feet from the face of the building or beyond the minimum required building setback for the zone district in which located. Such signs shall not exceed fifteen (15) square feet per face. (2) No sign may project over a public right-of-way in any zone district, except that signs eight (8) feet or more above grade may project up to forty-eight (48) inches from the face of the building if the total area for such signs is the lesser of one (1) square foot of sign for each linear foot of building or twelve (12) square feet per face. (3) No projecting sign shall exceed seven (7) feet in height. (I) )OXVK:DOO6LJQVDQG,QGLYLGXDO/HWWHU6LJQV No flush wall or individual letter sign shall exceed seven (7) feet in height. Flush wall and individual letter signs may not project more than twelve (12) inches horizontally from the face of the building on which they are erected. Flush wall and individual letter signs that are mounted on mansards or similar architectural features may not project more than twelve (12) inches horizontally, measured at the bottom of the sign, from the surface to which they are mounted. If the individual sections of an individual letter sign are connected by a common structure, commonly known as a "raceway," which provides for the electrical and/or mechanical operation of said sign, the "raceway" must be painted to match the color of the wall to which the sign is mounted and must be limited to a height of no more than one-half (½) of the height of the tallest letter. (J) &DQRS\6LJQV No canopy sign shall project above the top of the canopy upon which it is mounted. No canopy sign shall project from the face of a canopy. Under-canopy signs which are perpendicular to the face of the building shall be deemed to be projecting wall signs. Under-canopy signs which are parallel to the face of the building shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet above grade and shall be deemed to be flush wall signs. (K) $ZQLQJ6LJQV (1) No awning sign shall project above the top of the awning on which it is mounted. No awning sign shall project from the face of an awning. Awnings on which awning signs are mounted may extend over a public right-of-way no more than seven (7) feet from the face of a supporting building. Awnings on which awning signs are mounted shall be at least eight (8) feet above any public right-of-way, except that any valance attached to an awning may be no less than seven (7) feet above a public right-of-way. (2) Awning signs shall not be back-lit, except that letters and graphics may be back-lit if the background is completely opaque. The amount of signage on an awning shall be limited to the lesser of thirty-five (35) square feet per individual tenant space or twenty-five (25) percent of the total area of the awning. Awning signs shall not be allowed above the first story of a building. (L) 5HSHDOHGDVRI$XJXVW ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 26 (M) (OHFWULFDO6LJQVDQG(OHFWURQLF0HVVDJH&HQWHU6LJQV (1) Flashing, moving, blinking, chasing or other animation effects shall be prohibited on all signs. (2) Illuminated signs shall avoid the concentration of illumination. The intensity of the light source shall not produce glare, the effect of which constitutes a traffic hazard or is otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. (3) Every electric sign shall have affixed thereon an approved Underwriters' Laboratories label, and all wiring connected to such sign shall comply with all provisions of the National Electrical Code, as adopted by the City. (4) Signs that contain an electronic message center shall be subject to the following limitations. (a) The electronic message center must be programmed so that the displayed message does not change more frequently than once per minute and so that the message change from one (1) static display to another occurs instantaneously without the use of scrolling, flashing, fading or other similar effects. The message or image displayed must be complete in itself without continuation in content to the next message. Messages published by federal, state, or local government to communicate information to the public regarding an immediate threat to public health safety may be displayed notwithstanding the limitations set forth in this subsection (4)(a). (b) The electronic message center must be provided with automatic dimming software or solar sensors to control brightness for nighttime viewing and variations in ambient light. Lighting from the message center shall not exceed three-tenths (0.3) foot-candles over the ambient light as measured using a foot-candle meter at the following distances from the face of the message center: thirty-two (32) feet for a sign face greater than zero (0) square feet and not more than ten (10) square feet per side; thirty-nine (39) feet for a sign face greater than ten (10) square feet and not more than fifteen (15) square feet per side; forty-five (45) feet for a sign face greater than fifteen (15) square feet and not more than twenty (20) square feet per side; fifty (50) feet for a sign face greater than twenty (20) square feet and not more than twenty-five (25) square feet per side; fifty-five (55) feet for a sign face greater than twenty- five (25) square feet and not more than thirty (30) square feet per side; fifty-nine (59) feet for a sign face greater than thirty (30) square feet and not more than thirty-five (35) square feet per side; sixty-three (63) feet for a sign face greater than thirty-five (35) square feet and not more than forty (40) square feet per side; and sixty-three (63) feet for a sign face greater than forty (40) square feet and not more than forty-five (45) square feet per side. Lighting measurements shall be taken with the meter aimed directly at the message center face, with the message center turned off, and again with the message center turned on to a full white image for a message center capable of displaying a white color, or a full amber or red image for a message center capable of displaying only an amber or red color. The difference between the off and the white, amber or red message measurements shall not exceed three- tenths (0.3) foot-candles. All such signs shall contain a default mechanism that will cause the message center to revert immediately to a black screen if the sign malfunctions. Prior to the issuance of a permit for a sign containing an electronic message center, the permit applicant shall provide written certification from the sign manufacturer that the light intensity has been factory pre-set not to exceed the levels specified above. Prior to acceptance of the installation by the City, the permit holder shall schedule and inspection with the City Zoning Department to verify compliance. The permit holder and the business owner, business manager or property manager shall be in attendance during the inspection. (c) A displayed message must be presented in a single color, value and hue and the background must also be a single color, value and hue. (d) The maximum allowed size of an electronic message center shall be fifty percent (50%) of the total area of the sign face. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 27 (e) Electronic message centers shall be integrated harmoniously into the design of the larger sign face and structure, shall not be the predominant element of the sign, shall not be allowed on a freestanding pole sign, and if located at the top of the sign, must include a substantial cap feature above the electronic message center which consists of the same material, form, color or texture as is found on the sign face or structure. (f) With respect to sign permits issued after December 30, 2011, the pixel spacing of an electronic message center shall not exceed sixteen (16) mm, except that the maximum pixel spacing for a message center that is manufactured as a monochrome-only sign shall not exceed twenty (20) mm. (g) In the Downtown (D) District, wall signs with electronic message centers are not permitted on properties located within the boundaries of the Portable Sign Placement Area Map. (h) With respect to sign permits issued after December 30, 2011, no more than one (1) electronic message center sign shall be allowed to face each street abutting or within any property and/or site specific development plan. The minimum horizontal distance between electronic message center signs located on the same side of a street shall be one hundred (100) feet measured in a straight line. (i) An electronic message center located inside a building but visible from a public sidewalk or public street is subject to all of the regulations contained in this subsection. (j) Signs that contain an electronic message center which do not comply with the provisions of this Section shall be removed or made to conform by the dates specified in subparagraphs 1., 2. and 3. below and provided that such signs otherwise comply with subparagraph 3.8.7.1(A)(3)(b). (OHFWURQLFPHVVDJHFHQWHUVWKDWFRQWDLQGLPPLQJVRIWZDUHRUVRODUVHQVRUVFDSDEOH RIPHHWLQJWKHEULJKWQHVVOHYHOVGHVFULEHGLQVXESDUDJUDSK 0 E (P) 2II3UHPLVH6LJQV No off-premise sign shall be constructed in any zone district after February 25, 1994. No illumination shall be added to any off-premise sign already in existence. (Q) 9HKLFOH0RXQWHG6LJQV (1) All vehicle-mounted signs shall be permanently affixed, painted, magnetically applied or otherwise mounted upon a vehicle and shall not project more than eighteen (18) inches above the surface to which they are attached; and any sign which is mounted upon the roof, hood or trunk of a vehicle and which projects above such surface upon which it is mounted shall not exceed two (2) square feet in area per face. (2) No sign shall be placed or erected in the bed of a truck or on the deck of a trailer or a truck. (3) The primary purpose of any vehicle upon which a vehicle-mounted sign is affixed must be to serve a useful function in the transportation or conveyance of persons or commodities from one (1) place to another, including transportation to and from work, and such intermittent delays and stops as are customary in the routine conduct of the business or activity for which the transportation or conveyance occurs. (4) No vehicle upon which a vehicle-mounted sign is affixed may be parked on any lot for the primary purpose of directing or attracting the attention of the public to a building, institution, product, organization, event or location offered or existing elsewhere than upon the same lot where such vehicle is parked. (5) Banners displayed on vehicles shall be subject to the regulations contained in Section 3.8.7.2. (6) Vehicle-mounted signs used in connection with a special event are exempted from the requirements of this Section during the term of the special event only. Upon the conclusion of the special event, such signs must either be dismantled, moved to a location where the sign is not visible from public rights-of-way or made to comply with the provisions of this Section. For the purposes of this subsection, the term VSHFLDOHYHQW shall mean a parade, circus, fair, carnival, festival or other similar event that is intended to or likely to attract substantial numbers of persons and is different in character from the customary or usual activities generally associated with the property upon which the special event is to occur. (7) This Section shall not apply to signs that are being transported for installation. (R) 5HPRYDO RI $EDQGRQHG 6LJQ V (A) $SSOLFDELOLW\ The regulations contained in this Section 3.8.7.2 apply to temporary signs while permanent signs are regulated under Land Use Code Section 3.8.7.1 unless specifically provided herein. (B) 0HDVXUHPHQWV (1) 6LJQ$UHD (a) *HQHUDOO\ In general, sign area is the area within a continuous polygon with up to eight (8) straight sides that completely encloses the limits of text and graphics of a sign, together with any frame or other material or color forming an integral part of the display or used to differentiate the sign's contents from the background against which they are placed. (b) ([FOXVLRQV The sign area does not include the structure upon which the sign is placed (unless the structure is an integral part of the display or used to differentiate it), but does include any open space contained within the outer limits of the display face, or between any component, panel, strip, or figure of any kind composing the display face, whether this open space is enclosed by a frame or border or not. (c) 0XOWLSOH6LJQ)DFHV Freestanding temporary signs may have multiple faces. The area of such signs is measured using the vertical cross-section that represents the sign's maximum projection upon a vertical plane (e.g., for a sign with two (2) opposite faces on the same plane, only one (1) of the sign faces is measured). (2) 6LJQ+HLJKW Sign height is measured for detached temporary signs as the distance between ground level at the base of the sign and the top of the sign or sign structure, whichever is higher. (3) 3URSHUW\)URQWDJH Property frontage is measured as the length of each property boundary that abuts a public street right-of-way. (C) 3URKLELWHG6LJQVDQG6LJQ(OHPHQWV (1) *HQHUDOO\ The prohibitions in this Section apply to temporary signs in all zone districts of the City. (2) 3URKLELWHG6LJQ6WUXFWXUHV The following sign structures are not allowed: (a) portable signs, except as permitted in the Code of the City of Fort Collins Chapter 24, Article IV; (b) wind-driven signs except feather flags, banners, and pennants in compliance with this Section 3.8.7.2; (c) inflatable signs; (d) abandoned signs; (3) 3URKLELWHG'HVLJQ(OHPHQWV The following elements shall not be incorporated as an element of any sign or sign structure: (a) animated or moving parts, including any moving, swinging, rotating, or spinning parts or flashing, blinking, scintillating, fluctuating, or otherwise animated light; except as expressly allowed in this Section 3.8.7.2; (b) cardboard, card stock, or paper, except when laminated or used as a window sign located on the interior side of the window; (c) motor vehicles, unless: 1. the vehicles are operational, and either: a. automobile dealer inventory; or b. regularly used as motor vehicles, with current registration and tags; 2. the display of signage on the motor vehicle would not interfere with the immediate operation of the motor vehicle ( HJ , signs that are held in place by an open hood or ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 30 trunk are not allowed; signs that cover windows are not allowed; and signs that would fall off of the vehicle if the vehicle were in motion are not allowed); and 3. the motor vehicle is legally parked in a vehicle use area depicted on an approved site plan. (d) semi trailers, shipping containers, or portable storage units, unless: 1. the trailers, containers, or portable storage units are: a. structurally sound and capable of being transported; b. used for their primary purpose (e.g., storage, pick-up, or delivery); and c. if subject to registration, have current registration and tags; and 2. the display of signage is incidental to the primary purpose; and 3. the semi-trailer, shipping container, or portable storage unit is parked or placed in a designated loading area or on a construction site in an area that is designated on an approved construction staging plan. (e) stacked products ( HJ , tires, soft drink cases, bagged soil or mulch) that are placed in unapproved outdoor storage locations; (f) materials with a high degree of specular reflectivity, such as polished metal, installed in a manner that creates substantial glare from headlights, street lights, or sunlight. This prohibition does not include retroreflective materials that comply with the standards set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices; (g) rooftop signs and all other signs which project above the fascia wall. (4) 3URKLELWHG2EVWUXFWLRQV In no event shall a temporary sign obstruct the use of: (a) building ingress or egress, including doors, egress windows, and fire escapes; (b) operable windows (with regard to movement only, not transparency); (c) equipment, structures, or architectural elements that are related to public safety, building operations, or utility service (e.g., standpipes, downspouts, fire hydrants, electrical outlets, lighting, vents, valves, and meters). (5) 3URKLELWHG0RXQWV No temporary sign shall be posted, installed, mounted on, fastened, or affixed to any of the following: (a) any tree or shrub; (b) any utility pole or light pole, unless: 1. the sign is a banner or flag that is not more than ten (10) square feet in area; 2. the owner of the utility pole or light pole consents to its use for the display of the banner or flag; 3. the banner or flag is mounted on brackets or a pole that extend not more than thirty (30) inches from the utility pole or light pole; 4. the banner or flag is either situated above an area that is not used by pedestrians or vehicles, or the bottom of the banner or flag is at least eight (8) feet above grade; and 5. any applicable&LW\HQFURDFKPHQWDQGEDQQHUSHUPLWVDUHREWDLQHG (c) utility cabinets or pedestals (except signs that are applied by or with the consent of the owner of the utility cabinet or pedestal). (6) 3URKLELWHG/RFDWLRQV In addition to applicable setback requirements and other restrictions of this Section 3.8.7.2, no sign shall be located in any of the following locations: (a) in or over public rights-of-way (which, in addition to streets, may include other sidewalks, parkways, trails, multi-use pathways, retaining walls, utility poles, traffic calming devices, medians, and center islands that are within public rights-of-way), except: ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 31 1. signs painted on or affixed to transit shelters and bus benches as authorized by the provider of the shelter or bench, but not extending beyond the physical structure of the shelter or bench; 2. signs that are the subject of a revocable license agreement with the City, installed and maintained in accordance with the terms of that agreement; 3. portable signs permitted pursuant to the Code of the City of Fort Collins, Chapter 24, Article IV; or 4. signs posted by the City or jurisdiction that owns or maintains the right-of-way. (b) within any sight distance triangle that is described in Section 3.8.7.1. (D) 7HPSRUDU\6LJQ'LVWULFWV (1) *HQHUDOO\ In recognition that the City is a place of diverse physical character, and that different areas of the City have different functional characteristics, signs shall be regulated based on sign district in which they are located. (2) 7HPSRUDU\ 6LJQ 'LVWULFWV &UHDWHG The following sign districts are created: Downtown, Commercial/Industrial, Multifamily, and Single-Family. Sign districts shall correspond to zoning districts as provided in Table D, Temporary Sign Districts. 7DEOH' 7(0325$5<6,*1',675,&76 6LJQ'LVWULFW &RUUHVSRQGLQJ=RQLQJ'LVWULFWV 'RZQWRZQ '5'5 &RPPHUFLDO,QGXVWULDO 7&&&&1&&5&*&6&/+&(, 0XOWLIDPLO\0L[HG8VH /010011&01&%+011& 6LQJOH)DPLO\ 58/8(5)5/1&/32/5& (E) 6WDQGDUGVIRU$WWDFKHG7HPSRUDU\6LJQV (1) *HQHUDOO\ The standards of this Section apply to temporary signs that are attached to buildings. Temporary signs that are not attached to buildings are subject to the standards of Section 3.8.7.2(F). The standards of this Section are applied in conjunction with all other applicable standards. Duration of display is limited by Section 3.8.7.2(G). (2) $WWDFKHG7HPSRUDU\%DQQHUVDQG3HQQDQWV Attached temporary banners and pennants may only be displayed provided a permit is obtained pursuant to Section 3.8.7.2(I). (3) 7HPSRUDU\6LJQ&RYHUV Temporary sign covers are permitted in all sign districts, provided that they are used during a period not to exceed forty (40) days in which a new permanent sign or sign component is being fabricated and such sign or sign component is permitted and installed in accordance with Section 3.8.7.1. (4) 7HPSRUDU\:LQGRZ6LJQV (a) Temporary window signs are allowed in all locations where permanent window signs are allowed, provided that the transparency standards of Section 3.8.7.1 are met as to the combination of temporary and permanent window signs. (b) Temporary window signs shall be affixed to the window such that the fastener (e.g., tape) is not highly visible, or shall be mounted vertically inside of the building for viewing through the window. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 32 (F) 6WDQGDUGVIRU'HWDFKHG7HPSRUDU\6LJQV (1) *HQHUDOO\ The standards of this Section apply to temporary signs that are not attached to buildings. Temporary signs that are attached to buildings are subject to the standards of Section 3.8.7.2(E). The standards of this Section (F) are applied in conjunction with all other applicable standards of this Section 3.8.7.2. Duration of display is limited by Section 3.8.7.2(G). (2) 'HWDFKHG7HPSRUDU\6LJQV Detached temporary signs are allowed according to the standards in Table F, Detached Temporary Signs. Detached temporary sign types that are not listed in Table F (including but not limited to inflatable signs) are not allowed. Detached banners and pennants may only be displayed provided a permit is obtained pursuant to Section 3.8.7.2(I). Portable signs may only be displayed provided a permit is obtained pursuant to the Code of the City of Fort Collins, Chapter 24, Article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he purpose of temporary signs is to display messages for a temporary duration. Temporary signs shall not be used as a subterfuge to circumvent the regulations that apply to permanent signs or to add permanent signage to a property in addition to that which is allowed by Section 3.8.7.1. (2) &ODVVLILFDWLRQRI7HPSRUDU\6LJQ0DWHULDOV Temporary signs are constructed from a variety of materials with varying degrees of durability. Common materials are classified in Table G1, Classification of Temporary Sign Materials. 7DEOH* &ODVVLILFDWLRQRI7HPSRUDU\6LJQ0DWHULDOV 0DWHULDO 0DWHULDO &ODVV 3DSHUFDUGVWRFNIRDPFRUHERDUGRUFDUGERDUG ض /DPLQDWHGSDSHURUFDUGVWRFNSRO\HWK\OHQHEDJV ض &ORWKFDQYDVQ\ORQSRO\HVWHUEXUODSIOH[LEOHYLQ\ORURWKHUIOH[LEOHPDWHULDO RIFRPSDUDEOHGXUDELOLW\ ض ,QIOH[LEOHYLQ\OKDUGSODVWLFFRPSRVLWHRUFRUUXJDWHGSODVWLF FRURSODVW 6ZLQJ 6LJQ 1RW $OORZHG 1RW $OORZHG 1RW $OORZHG GD\V GD\V GD\V :LQGRZ 6LJQ GD\VSHU VLJQ GD\VSHU VLJQ GD\VSHU VLJQ GD\VSHU VLJQ GD\VSHU VLJQ GD\VSHUVLJQ )HDWKHU )ODJV 1RW $OORZHG 1RW $OORZHG GD\V 1RW $OORZHG 1RW $OORZHG GD\V 7$%/( 127(6 1 alternatively, the sign type may be displayed for three hundred sixty (360) days every two (2) calendar years. (b) Temporary signs that are required due to governmental regulation (e.g., public notices) shall be removed as required by the applicable regulation. (4) $GPLQLVWUDWLYH,QWHUSUHWDWLRQV Materials for signage that are not listed in this Section 3.8.7.2(G) may be introduced into the market. When a material is proposed that is not listed in this Section 3.8.7.2(G), the Director shall determine the class of materials with which the new material is most closely comparable, based on the new material's appearance, durability, and colorfastness. No temporary sign shall be displayed for a longer period than a site sign constructed of class 5 material, regardless of the durability material (although such a sign may be permissible under Land Use Code Section 3.8.7.1). (H) 7HPSRUDU\6LJQ0DLQWHQDQFH Temporary signs and temporary sign structures of all types shall be maintained as follows: (1) 3DLQW DQG )LQLVKHV Paint and other finishes shall be maintained in good condition. Peeling finishes shall be repaired. Signs with running colors shall be repainted, repaired, or removed if the running colors were not a part of the original design. (2) 0LQHUDO'HSRVLWVDQG6WDLQV Mineral deposits and stains shall be promptly removed. (3) 'DPDJH Temporary signs that are obviously damaged shall be removed within twenty-four (24) hours. (4) 8SULJKW/HYHO3RVLWLRQ6LJQVWKDWDUHGHVLJQHGWREHXSULJKWDQGOHYHOVKDOOEH installed and maintained in an upright and level position. Feather flag poles shall be installed in a vertical position. Signs that are not upright and level shall be removed or restored to an upright, level position. (I) %DQQHUVDQG3HQQDQWV (1) Attached unframed banners, detached banners, and attached and detached pennants are allowed in any zone district pursuant to the restrictions in below Table I provided a permit is (3) The Director shall review a banner or pennant permit application within two (2) business days to determine completeness. If it is complete, the Director shall approve or deny the application within three (3) business days after such determination. If it is incomplete, the Director shall cause the application to be returned to the applicant within one (1) business day of the determination, along with written reasons for the determination of incompleteness. (4) Notwithstanding the size and time limitations contained in Table I, noncommercial banners or pennants may be larger in size and displayed for such additional periods of time as may be established by the City Manager during community events that, in the judgment of the City Manager, advance a goal or policy of the City Council and contribute to the health, safety or welfare of the City. 7DEOH, $77$&+('81)5$0('%$11(56$1'3(11$176 VI VTXDUHIHHWIW OLQHDUIHHW1$ QRWDSSOLFDEOH SURSHUW\IURQWDJH RU SHUIWRI SURSHUW\ IURQWDJHLIVHFXUHG WRWHPSRUDU\ FRQVWUXFWLRQ IHQFLQJUHODWHGWR SHUPLWWHG FRQVWUXFWLRQ PD\ EHFOXVWHUHG $SSHQGL[$ WR38'0DVWHU3ODQ6XPPDU\ 3.8.26 - Buffering for Residential and High Occupancy Building Units (A) $SSOLFDELOLW\ . These standards apply only to applications that include residential uses and, to the extent legally applicable, high occupancy building units. Standards regarding Buffer Yard D shall not apply to any lot for which a site specific development plan with vested rights was approved prior to September 14, 2018 so long as such site specific development plan was, or is, valid at the time of issuance of any building permit for the construction or modification of any dwelling unit or high occupancy building unit on such lot. (B) 3XUSRVH . The purpose of this Section is to provide standards to separate residential land uses and high occupancy building units from existing industrial uses in order to eliminate or minimize potential nuisances such as dirt, litter, noise, glare of lights and unsightly buildings or parking areas, or to provide spacing to reduce adverse impacts of noise, odor, air pollutants, hazardous materials or site contamination, or danger from fires or explosions. (C) %XIIHUVWDQGDUGV . Buffer yards shall be located on the outer perimeter of a lot or parcel and may be required along all property lines for buffering purposes and shall meet the standards as provided in this Section. (1) Only those structures used for buffering and/or screening purposes shall be located within a buffer yard. The buffer yard shall not include any paved area, except for pedestrian sidewalks or paths or vehicular access drives which may intersect the buffer yard at a point which is perpendicular to the buffer yard and which shall be the minimum width necessary to provide vehicular or pedestrian access. Fencing and/or walls used for buffer yard purposes shall be solid, with at least seventy-five (75) percent opacity. (2) There are four (4) types of buffer yards which are established according to land use intensity as described in Chart 1 below. Buffer yard distances are established in Chart 2 below and specify deciduous or coniferous plants required per one hundred (100) linear feet along the affected property line, on an average basis. (3) The buffer yard requirements shall not apply to temporary or seasonal uses or to properties that are separated by a major collector street, arterial street, or highway. (4) $GGLWLRQDO6WDQGDUGV$SSOLFDEOHWR%XIIHU<DUG' . The following requirements shall also apply to development located in Buffer Yard D: (a) 0HDVXUHG . For purposes of Buffer Yard D standards, the buffer yard shall be measured as either the distance from the outer edge of an oil and gas location to the nearest wall or corner of any dwelling or high occupancy building unit location or, if any Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission adopted setback measurement method applicable to a dwelling or high occupancy building unit results in a greater distance between the existing oil and gas operation site location and the dwelling or high occupancy building unit at issue, then the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission setback measurement method shall be used. Buffer Yard D areas may include paved areas, notwithstanding paragraph (1) above. (b) 0LQLPXP%XIIHU'LVWDQFHV The following minimum buffer distances shall apply: 5HVLGHQWLDO'HYHORSPHQW The minimum buffer between a dwelling and any oil and gas location shall be five hundred (500) feet, or the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission designated setback distance, whichever is greater. Public playgrounds, parks, recreational fields, or community gathering spaces shall not be placed within a buffer. Private common areas within a buffer shall not contain playgrounds, parks, recreational fields, or community gathering spaces +LJK2FFXSDQF\%XLOGLQJ8QLWV The minimum buffer between a high occupancy building unit and any oil and gas location shall be one thousand (1,000) feet, or the Colorado Oil and ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 41 Gas Conservation Commission designated setback distance, whichever is greater. Public or private playgrounds, parks, recreational fields, or community gathering spaces shall not be allowed within a buffer. (c) $OWHUQDWLYHFRPSOLDQFHEXIIHUUHGXFWLRQIURPSOXJJHGDQGDEDQGRQHGZHOOV Upon applicant request, the decision maker may approve a reduced buffer distance from a plugged and abandoned well for which reclamation has been completed, all of the aforementioned in accordance with Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission regulations, in lieu of the minimum buffer distances set forth in the immediately preceding Subsection (b), provided that the approved reduced buffer is no less than 150 feet from the permanently abandoned well and meets the requirements specified below. 3URFHGXUH To request alternative compliance, an alternative compliance buffer reduction plan shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the submittal requirements established by the Director. At a minimum, the plan must: a. Clearly identify and discuss the proposed buffer reduction and the ways in which the plan will equally well or better eliminate or minimize the nuisances and reduce the adverse effects referenced in the purpose of this Section than would a plan which complies with the separation and spacing standards of this Section. b. Include information regarding environmental testing and monitoring for the site. Site investigation, sampling, and monitoring shall be conducted to demonstrate that the well has been properly abandoned and that soil, air and water quality have not been adversely impacted by oil and gas operations or facilities or other sources of contamination. Such sampling and monitoring shall be conducted by a qualified environmental engineering or consulting firm with experience in oil and gas investigations. Director approval that the sampling and monitoring plan contains the information required pursuant to this subsection b) is required prior to sampling occurring and such plan shall include, but is not limited to, the following: i. Site survey, historical research, and/or physical locating techniques to determine exact location and extent of oil and gas operations and facilities. ii. Documentation of plugging activities, abandonment and any subsequent inspections. iii. Soil sampling, including soil gas testing. iv. Groundwater sampling. v. Installation of permanent groundwater wells for future site investigations. vi. A minimum of five (5) years of annual soil gas and groundwater monitoring at the well location. c. Upon completion of the site investigation and sampling, not including the ongoing monitoring, the consultant must provide a written report verifying that the soil and groundwater samples meet applicable EPA and State residential regulations and that a reduced buffer would not pose a greater health or safety risk for future residents or users of the site. Otherwise, the decision maker may specify an appropriate buffer distance or require that the following actions be completed by a qualified professional before development may occur, including but not limited to: i. Remediation of environmental contamination to background levels. ii. Well repair or re-plugging of a previously abandoned well. 2. 5HYLHZ&ULWHULD To approve an alternative compliance buffer reduction plan, the decision maker must first find that the proposed alternative plan eliminates or minimizes the nuisances and reduces the adverse effects referenced in the purpose of this Section equally well or better than would a plan which complies with the separation and spacing standards of this Section. An approved alternative compliance buffer reduction plan shall be exempt from the screening requirements of Chart 2 - Buffer Yard Types and below Subsection (e) regarding fencing. (d) 'LVFORVXUH . If any residential development or dwelling, or high occupancy building unit is proposed to be located within one thousand (1,000) feet of an oil and gas location, the following requirements shall apply: 1. At such time as the property to be developed is platted or replatted, the plat shall show the one-thousand-foot radius on the property from such oil and gas location and shall ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 42 contain a note informing subsequent property owners that certain lots shown on the plat are in close proximity to an existing oil and gas location. 2. For residential developments requiring a declaration pursuant to the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act, a statement shall be included in such declaration specifying the lots within such residential development upon which dwellings may be constructed that are within one thousand (1,000) feet of an oil and gas location. The approved plat for such residential development shall be attached to the recorded declaration. Where no such declaration is required, the property owner shall record a statement on the property where the dwelling is located indicating that such property is located within one thousand feet of an oil and gas location. (e) )HQFLQJ . If any residential development is proposed to be located within five hundred (500) feet of an oil and gas location, and if an existing fence does not surround the oil and gas location, the developer must erect a fence that restricts public access to the oil and gas location along the property boundary between the oil and gas location and the development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rban Agriculture (A) $SSOLFDELOLW\. These standards apply to all urban agriculture land uses, except those urban agriculture land uses that are approved as a part of a site-specific development plan. (B) 3XUSRVH. The intent of these urban agriculture supplementary regulations is to allow for a range of urban agricultural activities at a level and intensity that is compatible with the City's neighborhoods. (C) 6WDQGDUGV. (1) /LFHQVHUHTXLUHG. Urban agriculture land uses shall be permitted only after the owner or applicant for the proposed use has obtained an urban agriculture license from the City. The fee for such a license shall be the fee established in the Development Review Fee Schedule. If active operations have not been carried on for a period of twenty-four (24) consecutive months, the license shall be deemed to have been abandoned regardless of intent to resume active operations. The Director may revoke any urban agriculture license issued by the City if the holder of such license is in violation of any of the provisions contained in paragraph (2) below, provided that the holder of the license shall be entitled to the administrative review of any such revocation under the provisions contained in Chapter 2, Article VI of the City Code. (2) *HQHUDO6WDQGDUGV. Urban agriculture shall be allowed as a permitted use, provided that all of the following conditions are met: (a) Mechanized Equipment. All mechanized equipment used in the urban agriculture land use must be in compliance with Chapter 20, Article II of the City Code regarding noise levels. (b) Parking. Urban agriculture land uses shall provide additional off-street vehicular and bicycle parking areas adequate to accommodate parking demands created by the use. (c) Chemicals and Fertilizers. Synthetic pesticides or herbicides may be applied only in accordance with state and federal regulations. All chemicals shall be stored in an enclosed, locked structure when the site is unattended. No synthetic pesticides or herbicides may be applied within a Natural Habitat Buffer Zone. (d) Trash/Compost. Trash and compost receptacles shall be screened from adjacent properties by utilizing landscaping, fencing or storage within structures and all trash shall be removed from the site weekly. Compost piles and containers shall be set back at least ten (10) feet from any property line when urban agriculture abuts a residential land use. (e) Maintenance. All urban agriculture land uses shall be maintained in an orderly manner, including necessary watering, pruning, pest control and removal of dead or diseased plant materials, and shall be maintained in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 20 of the City Code. (f) Water Conservation and Conveyance. To the extent reasonably feasible, the use of sprinkler irrigation between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. shall be minimized. Drip irrigation or watering by hand may be done at any time. The site must be designed and maintained so that any water runoff is conveyed off-site into a City right-of-way or drainage system without adversely affecting downstream property. (g) Identification/Contact Information. A clearly visible sign shall be posted near the public right- of-way adjacent to all urban agriculture land uses, which sign shall contain the name and contact information of the manager or coordinator of the agricultural land use. If a synthetic pesticide or herbicide is used in connection with such use, the sign shall also include the name of the chemical and the frequency of application. The contact information for the manager or coordinator shall be kept on file with the City. All urban agriculture signs must comport with Section 3.8.7 of this Code. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 46 (h) If produce from an urban agriculture land use is proposed to be distributed throughout the City, the applicant must provide a list of proposed Food Membership Distribution Sites in the application. (i) Floodplains. If urban agriculture is proposed within a floodplain, then a Floodplain Use Permit is required in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Code. (j) Hoop Houses. If an urban agriculture land use contains a hoop house, then the hoop house shall be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from any property line and shall also be located in such a manner that the hoop house does not generate potential adverse impacts on adjacent uses, such as shading or glare. (k) Additional Impact Mitigation. Measures such as landscaping, fencing or setbacks to mitigate potential visual, noise or odor impacts on adjoining property may be required by the Director. There shall be no offensive noise, vibration, smoke, dust, odors, heat or glare noticeable at or beyond the property line of the parcel where the urban agriculture land use is conducted. Where an urban agriculture land use abuts a residential use, there shall be a minimum setback of five (5) feet between the operation and the property line. (3) 1RWLFH. At the time of an initial application for an urban agriculture land use within a residential zone (N-C-L, N-C-M, U-E, R-F, R-L, L-M-N, M-M-N, H-M-N, N-C-B, R-C and P-O-L) or if the urban agriculture land use exceeds one-half (0.5) acre in size, the Director shall determine whether the proposed urban agriculture land use presents a significant impact on the affected neighborhood, and, if so, the Director shall schedule a neighborhood meeting and provide mailed and posted notice for such meeting. Such notice and neighborhood meeting shall be conducted in accordance with Sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.6 of this Code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ork Session Packet Pg. 48 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT Appendix B-1 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 49 :ĂŶƵĂƌǇϮϮ͕ϮϬϭϵ DĂƌĐsŝƌĂƚĂ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ ϮϴϭEŽƌƚŚŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞ &ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ŽůŽƌĂĚŽϴϬϱϮϰ Z͗DŽŶƚĂǀĂWhʹ>ĂƌŝŵĞƌŽƵŶƚǇhƌďĂŶƌĞĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ;>h^^ͿsĂƌŝĂŶĐĞZĞƋƵĞƐƚ ĞĂƌDƌ͘sŝƌĂƚĂ͕ sĂƌŝĂŶĐĞZĞƋƵĞƐƚͲdŚƌĞĞ>ĞŐ͞z͟^ƚƌĞĞƚ/ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ /ƐƐƵĞ/ĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ WĞƌ>h^^ŚĂƉƚĞƌϴʹ/ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϴ͘Ϯ͘ϯŶŐůĞŽĨ/ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ͕ƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚĂƚĞƐ͗ EĞǁĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƌŽĂĚǁĂǇƐƐŚŽƵůĚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚĂƚϵϬĚĞŐƌĞĞƐǁŚĞŶĞǀĞƌƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ͘/ŶŶŽĐĂƐĞƐŚĂůůƚŚĞǇŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚĂƚ ůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϴϬĚĞŐƌĞĞƐŽƌŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶϭϬϬĚĞŐƌĞĞƐ͘ tŚŝůĞĂŵĂũŽƌŝƚǇŽĨĂůůŶĞǁŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐĂƌĞϰůĞŐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐǁŚĞƌĞĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŶŐůĞŽĨ /ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŵĂŬĞƐŐŽŽĚƐĞŶƐĞ͕ƚŚĞŵŽĚŝĨŝĞĚƐƚƌĞĞƚŐƌŝĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞDŽŶƚĂǀĂWhDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƐĞǀĞƌĂůƚŚƌĞĞůĞŐ͞z͟ƐƚƌĞĞƚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ;ŚĞƌĞĂĨƚĞƌĐĂůůĞĚƚŚƌĞĞůĞŐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐͿ͕ĂĚĞƐŝŐŶŝŶǁŚŝĐŚ ŝƚŝƐŝŵƉŽƐƐŝďůĞĨŽƌĂůůƚŚƌĞĞůĞŐƐƚŽĐŽŵƉůǇ͘ƚƚŚĞƚŚƌĞĞůĞŐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂƚůĞĂƐƚƚǁŽŽĨƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ ŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚĂƚŐƌĞĂƚĞƌƚŚĂŶϭϬϬĚĞŐƌĞĞƐ͘ ǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞƚŽƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϴ͘Ϯ͘ϯŝƐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚƚŽĂůůŽǁĨŽƌϯůĞŐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚƐƚƌĞĞƚ ŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶĂŶŐůĞƐŽĨŐƌĞĂƚĞƌƚŚĂŶϭϬϬĚĞŐƌĞĞƐ͘ WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚůƚĞƌŶĂƚĞĞƐŝŐŶ͗ dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚŚƌĞĞůĞŐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞĂŶŐůĞďĞƚǁĞĞŶŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŽĨϭϮϬ ĚĞŐƌĞĞƐ͘dŚĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚĞǆŚŝďŝƚĂůƐŽƐŚŽǁƐƚǁŽĞŶůĂƌŐĞĚƚŚƌĞĞůĞŐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶĚĞƚĂŝůƐŽĨƚŚĞƚǇƉŝĐĂůĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ ĨŽƌĂůŽĐĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚĂŶŽƚŚĞƌůŽĐĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚĂŶĚĂĐŽůůĞĐƚŽƌƐƚƌĞĞƚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚĂůŽĐĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚ͘ ŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶƚŽ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͗ dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚŚƌĞĞůĞŐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞĂŶŐůĞďĞƚǁĞĞŶŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŽĨϭϮϬ ĚĞŐƌĞĞƐǁŚŝĐŚŝƐŐƌĞĂƚĞƌƚŚĂŶƚŚĞϭϬϬĚĞŐƌĞĞƐƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚĂůůŽǁƐ͘dŚĞƌĞŝƐŶŽĨŽƌĞƐĞĞŶĂĚǀĞƌƐĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƚŽ ĐĂƉŝƚĂůĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĐŽƐƚƐƌĞůĂƚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚŝƐǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚ͘ ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 50 W Ă Ő Ğ Ϯͮϰ :ƵƐƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ DŽŶƚĂǀĂ͛ƐĚĞƐŝŐŶŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƐŬĞǇĂƐƉĞĐƚƐŽĨƚŚĞƐƵďĂƌĞĂƉůĂŶĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚǇ͛ƐŵŝǆĞĚͲƵƐĞŐŽĂůƐ͘/ŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽ ĂĐĐŽŵƉůŝƐŚƚŚĞƐĞ͕ƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŝůůƚĂŬĞƚŚĞĨŽƌŵŽĨƐĞĂŵůĞƐƐŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĂŶĚĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚďǇ ĐĂůŵ͕ǁĂůŬĂďůĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƵŶĨƌŽƐƚĞĚďǇĂĐƚŝǀĞĂŶĚŚƵŵĂŶͲĐĞŶƚƌŝĐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͘dŚŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐĂŐƌĞĂƚĞƌĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚǇŽĨ ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚĂƌĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐĂŶĚďƵĨĨĞƌƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶƵƐĞƐĂŶĚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͘ŽŵƉĂƚŝďŝůŝƚǇďĞƚǁĞĞŶ ƵƐĞƐĂŶĚŝŶƚĞŶƐŝƚǇŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝƐŚĂŶĚůĞĚďǇŐƌĂĚƵĂůůǇŝŶĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐĂŶĚĚĞĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝŶƚĞŶƐŝƚǇ ďǇĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŶŐƚŚĞĨŽƌŵĂŶĚƐĐĂůĞŽĨďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƚŚĞĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚǇŽĨĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐƚŚĂƚƚĂŬĞƉůĂĐĞǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞŵ͘^ƚƌĞĞƚĚĞƐŝŐŶŝƐŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚƚŽƐƚŝƚĐŚƚŚĞƐĞƵƐĞƐƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌ͕ŶŽƚƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞƚŚĞŵ͘dŚĞǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞƐƐŽƵŐŚƚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂǁŝĚĞƌƌĂŶŐĞŽĨůŽĐĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨĐŽůůĞĐƚŽƌƐĂŶĚĂƌƚĞƌŝĂůƐǁŝƚŚ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƐŝƚĞĂŶĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͘dŚĞƐĞĂƌĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞĂĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĞĚĂŶĚŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞĚƐĞƌŝĞƐŽĨ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐƚŚĂƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐŝŶŐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐƚŽǁĂůŬĂŶĚďŝŬĞĂƐĂƉƌŝŵĂƌǇŵĞĂŶƐ ŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘ 'ĞŶĞƌĂůůǇ͕ƚŚĞĚŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶĂůĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŵŽƌĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬĂŶĚƉĂƌŬǁĂǇƐƉĂĐĞƚŚĂŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ ƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͘ĨĞǁ͕ůŝŵŝƚĞĚĐĂƐĞƐ͕ĂƵŐŵĞŶƚŽƌƌĞĚƵĐĞďŝĐǇĐůĞĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽƉƌŽŵŽƚĞĂƌŽĂĚǁĂǇ ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌƚŚĂƚƌĞĚƵĐĞƐǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐƉĞĞĚƐĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂƉůĞĂƐĂŶƚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͘dŚĞƐĞĚŽŶŽƚƌĞĚƵĐĞ ŽǀĞƌĂůůďŝĐǇĐůĞĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇŝŶĂŶǇǁĂǇ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ĂƐƚŚĞĨƵůůŶĞƚǁŽƌŬŽĨƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚƚƌĂŝůƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐ ĂŶĚĨƌĞƋƵĞŶƚďŝĐǇĐůĞĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶĞǀĞƌǇĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ͕ŽŶƐƚƌĞĞƚĂŶĚŝŶƚƌĂŝůƐ͘ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůůŽĐĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚƚǇƉĞƐ ĂƌĞĂĚĚĞĚƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŬĞǇŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞ͕ƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌ͕ĂŶĚƚƌĂŝůĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůůǇ͕ŶĞǁƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůůŽĐĂůƐĂƌĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƚŽĂĐĐŽƵŶƚĨŽƌƐƚĂĨĨ͛ƐĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐǁŝƚŚĂŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨƌĞĐĞŶƚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƚŚĞŝƚǇǁŚĞƌĞƚŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůůŽĐĂůǇŝĞůĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚŚĂƐďĞĞŶďƵŝůƚĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚ ĂůůĞǇͲůŽĂĚĞĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘/ŶƚŚĞƐĞĐĂƐĞ͛ƐƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞŝŶƐƵĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚďƌĞĂŬƐŝŶƉĂƌŬĞĚĐĂƌƐǁŚŝĐŚĐĂƵƐĞƐƚŚĞǇŝĞůĚ ĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶƚŽĨĂŝů͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůůŽĐĂůƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚŚĞŶĂƌƌŽǁŶĞƐƐŽĨƌŽĂĚǁĂǇĚĞƐŝƌĞĚƚŽĐŽŶƚƌŽů ƐƉĞĞĚƐĂŶĚĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌǁŚŝůĞĞŶƐƵƌŝŶŐǀĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌŵŽǀĞŵĞŶƚŝƐƵŶĞŶĐƵŵďĞƌĞĚ͘ 'ĞŶĞƌĂůůǇ͕ƚŚĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞƐĂƌĞƌĞĂƐŽŶĂďůĞĂŶĚƌĞůĂƚĞĚĚŝƌĞĐƚůǇƚŽƚŚĞĚĞƐŝƌĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƐƵďĂƌĞĂƉůĂŶĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚďǇĐŽŵŵŽŶŵŝǆĞĚͲƵƐĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞƐ ĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞĐŽƵŶƚƌǇ͘ ŶĞǆŚŝďŝƚƐŚŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞŐĞŶĞƌĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚŚƌĞĞůĞŐ/ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐŝŶƚŚĞDŽŶƚĂǀĂWhDĂƐƚĞƌ WůĂŶŝƐĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚŝƐůĞƚƚĞƌŝŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŽĨƚŚŝƐǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚ͘dŚĞƚŚƌĞĞůĞŐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚϭϮϬĚĞŐƌĞĞ ŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶĂŶŐůĞǁŝůůĂůůŽǁĨŽƌďĞƚƚĞƌƐŝŐŚƚĂŶŐůĞƐĨŽƌǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐŶĂǀŝŐĂƚŝŶŐƚŚĞŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ͘ /ƚŝƐĂĐŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞĚďǇƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƚĞĂŵĂŶĚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƚŚĂƚŵĂŶǇĚĞƐŝŐŶĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚĞƚŽĂƐĂĨĞ ĂŶĚĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶŶŽƚŽŶůǇƚŚĞĂŶŐůĞŽĨŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŶŐƌŽĂĚǁĂǇƐ͘^ŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞƐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ůĂŶĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚƐ͕ǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůƉƌŽĨŝůĞƐ͕ƚƵƌŶůĂŶĞĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐ͕ĐƵƌďƌĞƚƵƌŶƌĂĚŝŝ͕ĐƵƌď ƌĞƚƵƌŶŐƌĂĚĞƐ͕ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐŝƐůĂŶĚƐ͕ƐƚƌŝƉŝŶŐ͕ƐŝŐŶĂŐĞ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐ͕ďŝŬĞůĂŶĞƐĂŶĚĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐ͕ŽŶͲƐƚƌĞĞƚ ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͕ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĂŶĚŚĂƌĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐĂŶĚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚƌŽů͘ tĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚ͕ƚŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨƚŚŝƐǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŽĨ>h^^ƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϴ͘Ϯ͘ϯ͕ŶŐůĞŽĨ /ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƚŽĂůůŽǁƚŚƌĞĞůĞŐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŶŐůĞŐƐŽĨŐƌĞĂƚĞƌƚŚĂŶϭϮϬĚĞŐƌĞĞƐ͕ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶĞĚ ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 51 W Ă Ő Ğ ϯͮϰ ƵƉŽŶƌŽĂĚǁĂǇƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌƐƵĐŚƚŚƌĞĞůĞŐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐƚŽďĞƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĨŝŶĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉůĂŶ;&WͿ ǁŚŝĐŚǁŝůůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĂůůŽƚŚĞƌĚĞƐŝŐŶƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌĂƐĂĨĞĂŶĚĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ͘ dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚŚƌĞĞůĞŐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐǁŝůůďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶƐĂĨĞůǇĂŶĚĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚůǇ͘dŚŝƐǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞŝƐŶŽƚ ĨŽƌĞƐĞĞŶƚŽďĞĚĞƚƌŝŵĞŶƚĂůƚŽƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂůƚŚ͕ƐĂĨĞƚǇ͕ĂŶĚǁĞůĨĂƌĞƐŝŶĐĞƚŚĞƐŝŐŚƚĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞƐĂƚƐƵĐŚ ŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐǁŝůůďĞďĞƚƚĞƌƚŚĂŶƚŚŽƐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĂƚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐƚŚĂƚĐŽŵƉůǇǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ͘&ŝŶĂůůǇ͕ƚŚĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶůŝĨĞŽĨƚŚĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŝůůŶŽƚďĞƌĞĚƵĐĞĚĂƐĂƌĞƐƵůƚŽĨƚŚĞĂŶŐůĞŽĨŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞ͘ ^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůǇ͕ WĞƚĞƌƵĐŬůĞǇ͕W KWηϰϬϲϳϭ ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ͗ DŽŶƚĂǀĂWhdŚƌĞĞ>ĞŐ/ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ DŽŶƚĂǀĂWhdŚƌĞĞ>ĞŐ/ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐͲ'ĞŶĞƌĂů>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ DŽŶƚĂǀĂWhdŚƌĞĞ>ĞŐ/ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ 001/22/19 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 52 W Ă Ő Ğ ϰͮϰ ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 53 Sheet Number: Project Number: Project: Client: /USERS/MATT/ELC/SHARED/PROJECTS-2015_2019/1725-MONTAVA/1725-02-FILES/1725-MASTERPLAN/01-RESOURCE/TITLE_BLOCK/PUD_SUBMITTAL/24X36_TITLE_BLOCK_PUD_CONSULTANT.DWG Plot Date:9/13/2018 10:34 AM Plotted By: Matthew Lambert Date Created:9/13/2018 Produced by: Date: Revision & Date: X.X. X.X.XXX 1734 HF2M MONTAVA MONTAVA OVERALL UTILITY PLAN PUD MASTER PLAN 01/21/19 DPZ CODESIGN Y-INTERSECTIONS Potential Y-Intersections 1 Collector Roadway 2 Local Roadway ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 54 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT Appendix B-2 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 55 ZĞǀŝƐĞĚ&ĞďƌƵĂƌǇϭϱ͕ϮϬϭϵ :ĂŶƵĂƌǇϮϮ͕ϮϬϭϵ DĂƌĐsŝƌĂƚĂ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ ϮϴϭEŽƌƚŚŽůůĞŐĞǀĞŶƵĞ &ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ŽůŽƌĂĚŽϴϬϱϮϰ Z͗DŽŶƚĂǀĂWhʹ>ĂƌŝŵĞƌŽƵŶƚǇhƌďĂŶƌĞĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ;>h^^ͿsĂƌŝĂŶĐĞZĞƋƵĞƐƚ ĞĂƌDƌ͘sŝƌĂƚĂ͕ sĂƌŝĂŶĐĞZĞƋƵĞƐƚ͗^ƚƌĞĞƚƌŽƐƐͲ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ /ƐƐƵĞ/ĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ dŚĞDŽŶƚĂǀĂWhDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĚĞǀŝĂƚŝŽŶƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚĐƌŽƐƐͲƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐĂƐŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶŚĂƉƚĞƌϳͲ ^ƚƌĞĞƚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚdĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͘^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůǇ͕ƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϳ͘ϯ͘ϭͲŵĂŬĞƐƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽƚŚĞŝƚǇŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐĨŝŐƵƌĞƐϳͲϭ&ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϳͲϭϯ&͘ǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞŝƐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚƚŽĂůůŽǁĨŽƌĚĞǀŝĂƚŝŽŶƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŝƚǇŽĨ &ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐƐƚƌĞĞƚĐƌŽƐƐͲƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƐŝƚĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƚŚĞŵŽĚŝĨŝĞĚďůŽĐŬƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐ ĞŶǀŝƐŝŽŶĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞDŽŶƚĂǀĂƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚůƚĞƌŶĂƚĞĞƐŝŐŶ͗ dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐƚƌĞĞƚĐƌŽƐƐƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐǀĂƌǇĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ>h^^ŝƚǇŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐƐƚƌĞĞƚĐƌŽƐƐƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐďǇĂ ĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͗ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇ;ZKtͿǁŝĚƚŚ͕ƌŽĂĚǁĂǇ ǁŝĚƚŚ͕ƉĂƌŬǁĂǇǁŝĚƚŚ͕ŵĞĚŝĂŶƐŽƌĨĞŶĐĞƐĞƚďĂĐŬƐ͘ dŚĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐĂƌĞĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗ ϭ͘ ŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů>ŽĐĂůǁŝƚŚŝŬĞ>ĂŶĞƐʹZĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌŵŽĚŝĨŝĞĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ;^ƚƌĞĞƚϱͿ͗ Ă͘ ZĞĨĞƌƚŽƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϭĨŽƌƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͘ ď͘ ŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶƚŽ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚ:ƵƐƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ ŝ͘ /ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƌŽĂĚǁĂǇǁŝĚƚŚďǇϮ͛ĨƌŽŵϱϬ͛ƚŽϱϮ͛ƚŽĂůůŽǁĨŽƌǁŝĚĞƌƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůĂŶĞƐ͘WĂƌŬŝŶŐ ůĂŶĞƐŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŝŶǁŝĚƚŚďǇϭ͛ĨƌŽŵϳ͛ƚŽϴ͛͘ Ϯ͘ ŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů>ŽĐĂůǁŝƚŚŽƵƚŝŬĞ>ĂŶĞƐʹZĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌŵŽĚŝĨŝĞĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ;^ƚƌĞĞƚϱͿ͗ Ă͘ ZĞĨĞƌƚŽƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϮĨŽƌƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͘ ď͘ ŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶƚŽ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚ:ƵƐƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ ŝ͘ /ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƌŽĂĚǁĂǇǁŝĚƚŚďǇϮ͛ĨƌŽŵϯϰ͛ƚŽϯϲ͛ƚŽĂůůŽǁĨŽƌǁŝĚĞƌƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůĂŶĞƐĂŶĚƐĂĨĞƌ ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͘WĂƌŬŝŶŐůĂŶĞƐŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŝŶǁŝĚƚŚďǇϭ͛ĨƌŽŵϳ͛ƚŽϴ͛͘ ŝŝ͘ ZĞĚƵĐĞŵŝŶŝŵƵŵZKtǁŝĚƚŚďǇϲ͛ĨƌŽŵϳϮ͛ƚŽϲϲ͛͘ Appendix B-2 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 56 W Ă Ő Ğ Ϯͮϰ ϯ͘ EĂƌƌŽǁZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů>ŽĐĂůʹZĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌŵŽĚŝĨŝĞĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ;^ƚƌĞĞƚϲͿ͗ Ă͘ ZĞĨĞƌƚŽƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϯĨŽƌƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͘ ď͘ ŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶƚŽ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚ:ƵƐƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ ŝ͘ ZĞĚƵĐĞƌŽĂĚǁĂǇǁŝĚƚŚďǇϮ͛ĨƌŽŵϯϬ͛ƚŽϮϴ͛ďǇĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚŝŶŐƉĂƌŬŝŶŐŽŶŽŶĞƐŝĚĞĂŶĚ ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐŚĂůůďĞŽŶŽŶĞƐŝĚĞŽŶůǇ͖ ŝŝ͘ ůůŽǁĂŶĂƌƌŽǁƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůůŽĐĂůŝŶůĞƐƐƵƌďĂŶĂƌĞĂƐĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞǁŝĚĞƌƉĂƌŬǁĂǇĂŶĚ ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐ͘ ϰ͘ ŽŶŶĞĐƚŽƌ>ŽĐĂůǁŝƚŚƚƚĂĐŚĞĚ'ƌĞĞŶʹZĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌŵŽĚŝĨŝĞĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ;^ƚƌĞĞƚϳͿ Ă͘ ZĞĨĞƌƚŽƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϰĨŽƌƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͘ ď͘ ŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶƚŽ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚ:ƵƐƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ ŝ͘ /ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƌŽĂĚǁĂǇǁŝĚƚŚďǇϭϮ͛ĨƌŽŵϯϲ͛ƚŽϰϴ͖͛ ŝŝ͘ ZĞŵŽǀĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬĨƌŽŵZKtŽŶŽŶĞƐŝĚĞĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬĞĂƐĞŵĞŶƚŽŶƉƌŝǀĂƚĞ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͘ ϱ͘ ͘>ŽĐĂůWĂŝƌĞĚKŶĞͲǁĂǇ͕dϰΘdϯʹZĞƋƵĞƐƚŶĞǁƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ;^ƚƌĞĞƚϴͿ Ă͘ ZĞĨĞƌƚŽƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϱĨŽƌƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͘ ď͘ ŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶƚŽ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚ:ƵƐƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ ŝ͘ WƌŽǀŝĚĞZKtǁŝĚƚŚŽĨϱϬ͛ĨŽƌĞĂĐŚƐŝĚĞŽĨŽŶĞͲǁĂǇƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͖ ŝŝ͘ WƌŽǀŝĚĞƌŽĂĚǁĂǇǁŝĚƚŚŽĨϮϬ͛ĨŽƌĞĂĐŚƐŝĚĞŽĨŽŶĞͲǁĂǇƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͕ ŝŝŝ͘ WƌŽǀŝĚĞƉƌŝǀĂƚĞĐĞŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂŶ͘ ϱ͘ ͘>ŽĐĂůWĂŝƌĞĚKŶĞͲǁĂǇ͕dϱʹZĞƋƵĞƐƚŶĞǁƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ;^ƚƌĞĞƚϴͿ Ă͘ ZĞĨĞƌƚŽƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϱĨŽƌƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͘ ď͘ ŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶƚŽ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚ:ƵƐƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ ŝ͘ WƌŽǀŝĚĞZKtǁŝĚƚŚŽĨϱϯ͛ĨŽƌĞĂĐŚƐŝĚĞŽĨŽŶĞͲǁĂǇƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͖ ŝŝ͘ WƌŽǀŝĚĞƌŽĂĚǁĂǇǁŝĚƚŚŽĨϮϬ͛ĨŽƌĞĂĐŚƐŝĚĞŽĨŽŶĞͲǁĂǇƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͕ ŝŝŝ͘ WƌŽǀŝĚĞƉƌŝǀĂƚĞĐĞŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂŶ͘ ϲ͘ sĂƌŝĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌĨĞŶĐŝŶŐƐĞƚďĂĐŬƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇ Ă͘ tĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚƌĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĨĞŶĐŝŶŐƐĞƚďĂĐŬƐĂůŽŶŐĂůůŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů>ŽĐĂů͕ ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů>ŽĐĂů͕ŽŶŶĞĐƚŽƌ>ŽĐĂů͕ĂŶĚWĂŝƌĞĚKŶĞͲtĂǇ>ŽĐĂů^ƚƌĞĞƚƐƐƚƌĞĞƚƌŝŐŚƚƐͲŽĨͲ ǁĂǇĂŶĚĂƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚŝŶŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϲ͘Ϯ͘ϭ͘>͘ĂŶĚ&ŝŐƵƌĞϭϲͲϭŽĨƚŚĞ>ĂƌŝŵĞƌŽƵŶƚǇhƌďĂŶ ƌĞĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŝŶdƌĂŶƐĞĐƚƐdϰĂŶĚdϱŽĨƚŚĞDŽŶƚĂǀĂWhDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŝŶƚŚĞ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͗ ŝ͘ &ĞŶĐĞƐŵƵƐƚďĞƐĞƚďĂĐŬĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϰŝŶĐŚĞƐĨƌŽŵƉƵďůŝĐƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬŝŶĂůů ŝŶƐƚĂŶĐĞƐ͘ ŝŝ͘ &ĞŶĐĞƐͬǁĂůůƐϯĨĞĞƚŝŶŚĞŝŐŚƚĂŶĚďĞůŽǁĂƌĞŶŽƚƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƐĞƚďĂĐŬƐ͘ ŝŝŝ͘ &ĞŶĐĞƐͬǁĂůůƐŽǀĞƌϯĨĞĞƚŝŶŚĞŝŐŚƚŵƵƐƚďĞƐĞƚďĂĐŬĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŝŶƐŝĚĞĞĚŐĞŽĨ ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐƚŚĞŵŝŶŝŵƵŵƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬǁŝĚƚŚƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚŝŶ>h^^ĨŽƌƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƚǇƉĞ ƉůƵƐϮĨĞĞƚ͘&ŽƌĞǆĂŵƉůĞ͕ĂůŽĐĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐĂϰ͘ϱĨŽŽƚƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƉůƵƐϮĨĞĞƚĨŽƌ ĨĞŶĐŝŶŐƐĞƚďĂĐŬǁŚŝĐŚĞƋƵĂůƐϲ͘ϱĨĞĞƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŝŶƐŝĚĞĞĚŐĞŽĨƚŚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ͘>ŽƚƐ ŽŶůŽĐĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚƐǁŝƚŚϲĨŽŽƚǁŝĚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐŵƵƐƚŚĂǀĞĨĞŶĐĞƐƐĞƚďĂĐŬĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵ ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 57 W Ă Ő Ğ ϯͮϰ ŽĨϲŝŶĐŚĞƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŽƵƚƐŝĚĞĞĚŐĞŽĨƚŚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ͕ǁŚŝĐŚĞƋƵĂƚĞƐƚŽϲ͘ϱĨĞĞƚĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞŝŶƐŝĚĞĞĚŐĞŽĨƚŚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ͘ ŝǀ͘ tŚĞƌĞƚŚĞĚĞƐŝƌĞĚĂƉƉĞĂƌĂŶĐĞŝƐĨĞŶĐŝŶŐǁŝƚŚǌĞƌŽƐĞƚďĂĐŬĨƌŽŵƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐ͕Ă ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬĞǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶŵĂǇďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞƉƌŝǀĂƚĞůŽƚ͘ĐŽŶƚƌŽůũŽŝŶƚŵƵƐƚďĞ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƚŽƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĂŶĚƉƌŝǀĂƚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐ͘ ǆĂŵƉůĞƉŚŽƚŽƐ͗ ǆŚŝďŝƚƐŽĨƚŚĞŝƚǇŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶĂůŽŶŐƐŝĚĞƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐƚƌĞĞƚĐƌŽƐƐͲƐĞĐƚŝŽŶĂƌĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽ ƚŚŝƐůĞƚƚĞƌŝŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŽĨƚŚŝƐǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚ͘ :ƵƐƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ DŽŶƚĂǀĂ͛ƐĚĞƐŝŐŶŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƐŬĞǇĂƐƉĞĐƚƐŽĨƚŚĞƐƵďĂƌĞĂƉůĂŶĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚǇ͛ƐŵŝǆĞĚͲƵƐĞŐŽĂůƐ͘/ŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽ ĂĐĐŽŵƉůŝƐŚƚŚĞƐĞ͕ƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŝůůƚĂŬĞƚŚĞĨŽƌŵŽĨƐĞĂŵůĞƐƐŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĂŶĚĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚďǇ ĐĂůŵ͕ǁĂůŬĂďůĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƵŶĨƌŽƐƚĞĚďǇĂĐƚŝǀĞĂŶĚŚƵŵĂŶͲĐĞŶƚƌŝĐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͘dŚŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐĂŐƌĞĂƚĞƌĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚǇŽĨ ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 58 W Ă Ő Ğ ϰͮϰ ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚĂƌĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐĂŶĚďƵĨĨĞƌƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶƵƐĞƐĂŶĚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͘ŽŵƉĂƚŝďŝůŝƚǇďĞƚǁĞĞŶ ƵƐĞƐĂŶĚŝŶƚĞŶƐŝƚǇŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝƐŚĂŶĚůĞĚďǇŐƌĂĚƵĂůůǇŝŶĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐĂŶĚĚĞĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝŶƚĞŶƐŝƚǇ ďǇĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŶŐƚŚĞĨŽƌŵĂŶĚƐĐĂůĞŽĨďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƚŚĞĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚǇŽĨĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐƚŚĂƚƚĂŬĞƉůĂĐĞǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞŵ͘^ƚƌĞĞƚĚĞƐŝŐŶŝƐŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚƚŽƐƚŝƚĐŚƚŚĞƐĞƵƐĞƐƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌ͕ŶŽƚƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞƚŚĞŵ͘dŚĞǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞƐƐŽƵŐŚƚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂǁŝĚĞƌƌĂŶŐĞŽĨůŽĐĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨĐŽůůĞĐƚŽƌƐĂŶĚĂƌƚĞƌŝĂůƐǁŝƚŚ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƐŝƚĞĂŶĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͘dŚĞƐĞĂƌĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞĂĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĞĚĂŶĚŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞĚƐĞƌŝĞƐŽĨ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐƚŚĂƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐŝŶŐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐƚŽǁĂůŬĂŶĚďŝŬĞĂƐĂƉƌŝŵĂƌǇŵĞĂŶƐ ŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘ 'ĞŶĞƌĂůůǇ͕ƚŚĞĚŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶĂůĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŵŽƌĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬĂŶĚƉĂƌŬǁĂǇƐƉĂĐĞƚŚĂŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ ƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͘ĨĞǁ͕ůŝŵŝƚĞĚĐĂƐĞƐ͕ĂƵŐŵĞŶƚŽƌƌĞĚƵĐĞďŝĐǇĐůĞĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽƉƌŽŵŽƚĞĂƌŽĂĚǁĂǇ ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌƚŚĂƚƌĞĚƵĐĞƐǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐƉĞĞĚƐĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂƉůĞĂƐĂŶƚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͘dŚĞƐĞĚŽŶŽƚƌĞĚƵĐĞ ŽǀĞƌĂůůďŝĐǇĐůĞĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇŝŶĂŶǇǁĂǇ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ĂƐƚŚĞĨƵůůŶĞƚǁŽƌŬŽĨƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚƚƌĂŝůƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐ ĂŶĚĨƌĞƋƵĞŶƚďŝĐǇĐůĞĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶĞǀĞƌǇĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ͕ŽŶƐƚƌĞĞƚĂŶĚŝŶƚƌĂŝůƐ͘ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůůŽĐĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚƚǇƉĞƐ ĂƌĞĂĚĚĞĚƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŬĞǇŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞ͕ƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌ͕ĂŶĚƚƌĂŝůĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůůǇ͕ŶĞǁƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůůŽĐĂůƐĂƌĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƚŽĂĐĐŽƵŶƚĨŽƌƐƚĂĨĨ͛ƐĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐǁŝƚŚĂŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨƌĞĐĞŶƚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƚŚĞŝƚǇǁŚĞƌĞƚŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůůŽĐĂůǇŝĞůĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚŚĂƐďĞĞŶďƵŝůƚĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚ ĂůůĞǇͲůŽĂĚĞĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘/ŶƚŚĞƐĞĐĂƐĞ͛ƐƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞŝŶƐƵĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚďƌĞĂŬƐŝŶƉĂƌŬĞĚĐĂƌƐǁŚŝĐŚĐĂƵƐĞƐƚŚĞǇŝĞůĚ ĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶƚŽĨĂŝů͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůůŽĐĂůƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚŚĞŶĂƌƌŽǁŶĞƐƐŽĨƌŽĂĚǁĂǇĚĞƐŝƌĞĚƚŽĐŽŶƚƌŽů ƐƉĞĞĚƐĂŶĚĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌǁŚŝůĞĞŶƐƵƌŝŶŐǀĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌŵŽǀĞŵĞŶƚŝƐƵŶĞŶĐƵŵďĞƌĞĚ͘ 'ĞŶĞƌĂůůǇ͕ƚŚĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞƐĂƌĞƌĞĂƐŽŶĂďůĞĂŶĚƌĞůĂƚĞĚĚŝƌĞĐƚůǇƚŽƚŚĞĚĞƐŝƌĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƐƵďĂƌĞĂƉůĂŶĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚďǇĐŽŵŵŽŶŵŝǆĞĚͲƵƐĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞƐ ĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞĐŽƵŶƚƌǇ͘ dŚĞƌĞŝƐŶŽĨŽƌĞƐĞĞŶĂĚǀĞƌƐĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƚŽĐĂƉŝƚĂůĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĐŽƐƚƐƌĞůĂƚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚŝƐǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚ͘ dŚŝƐǀĂƌŝĂŶĐĞŝƐŶŽƚĨŽƌĞƐĞĞŶƚŽďĞĚĞƚƌŝŵĞŶƚĂůƚŽƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂůƚŚ͕ƐĂĨĞƚǇ͕ĂŶĚǁĞůĨĂƌĞŶŽƌƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶůŝĨĞŽĨƚŚĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚ͘ ^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůǇ͕ WĞƚĞƌƵĐŬůĞǇ͕W KWηϰϬϲϳϭ ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ͗ ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϭͲŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů>ŽĐĂůǁŝƚŚŝŬĞ>ĂŶĞƐ ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϮͲŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů>ŽĐĂůǁŝƚŚŽƵƚŝŬĞ>ĂŶĞƐ ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϯͲZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů>ŽĐĂů ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϰͲŽŶŶĞĐƚŽƌ>ŽĐĂů ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϱͲ>ŽĐĂůWĂŝƌĞĚKŶĞͲǁĂǇ 002/15/19 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 59 MONTAVA | ©2018 DPZ CoDESIGN DRAFT 01/01/19 10 STREET TYPES 5A | COMMERCIAL LOCAL 5A | COMMERCIAL LOCAL Right-of-Way 82 ft Roadway Width 52 ft Transect Zones T5 Parking Lanes 2 Sidewalk 9 ft Parking Width 8 Parkway Type Urban Tree Well Travel Lanes 2 Parkway Width 8 ft Lane Width 10 ft Curb & Gutter Type Vertical Curb Width 0.5 ft Gutter Width 2 ft Bike Facility Type Protected Bike Lanes Bike Lane Width 5 ft Bike Buffer Width 3 ft TYPICAL ADJACENT PRIVATE ALLEY EASEMENT Where buildings exceed 30 ft, additional alley width is required to accom- modate fire access. Two lanes, 7’ wide or 5’ wide with 3’ parking buffer when on-street parking present. . 10’ , plus 18’ (min.) utility easement. 7’ September, 2016 Attachment 1 - Commercial Local with Bike Lanes ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 60 MONTAVA | ©2018 DPZ CoDESIGN DRAFT 01/01/19 11 STREET TYPES 5B | COMMERCIAL LOCAL WITHOUT BIKE LANES 5B | COMMERCIAL LOCAL WITHOUT BIKE LANES Right-of-Way 66 ft Roadway Width 36 ft Transect Zones T5 Parking Lanes 2 Sidewalk 9 ft Parking Width 8 Parkway Type Urban Tree Well Travel Lanes 2 Parkway Width 6 ft Lane Width 10 ft Curb & Gutter Type Vertical Curb Width 0.5 ft Gutter Width 2 ft Bike Facility Type Shared lane Bike Lane Width - Bike Buffer Width - TYPICAL ADJACENT PRIVATE ALLEY EASEMENT Where buildings exceed 30 ft, additional alley width is required to accom- modate fire access. Two lanes, 7’ wide or 5’ wide with 3’ parking buffer when on-street parking present. . 10’ , plus 18’ (min.) utility easement. 7’ September, 2016 Attachment 2 - Commercial Local without Bike Lanes ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 61 MONTAVA | ©2018 DPZ CoDESIGN DRAFT 01/01/19 13 STREET TYPES 6B | RESIDENTIAL LOCAL WITH ALLEYS 6B | RESIDENTIAL LOCAL WITH ALLEYS Right-of-Way 51 ft Roadway Width 27 ft Transect Zones T4, T3 Parking Lanes 1 Sidewalk 5 ft Parking Width 7 ft Parkway Type Continuous Travel Lanes 2 Parkway Width 7 ft Lane Width 10 ft Curb & Gutter Type Vertical Curb Width 1 ft Gutter Width 1 ft Bike Facility Type Shared lane Bike Lane Width - Bike Buffer Width - TYPICAL ADJACENT PRIVATE ALLEY EASEMENT Where buildings exceed 30 ft, additional alley width is required to accom- modate fire access. May be used for residential local streets providing access to single family detached dwellings with driveways. , plus 18’ (min.) utility easement. September, 2016 Attachment 3 - Residential Local MONTAVA | ©2018 DPZ CoDESIGN DRAFT 01/01/19 13 STREET TYPES 6B | RESIDENTIAL LOCAL WITH ALLEYS 6B | RESIDENTIAL LOCAL WITH ALLEYS Right-of-Way 51 ft Roadway Width 27 ft Transect Zones T4, T3 Parking Lanes 1 Sidewalk 5 ft Parking Width 8 ft Parkway Type Continuous Travel Lanes 2 Parkway Width 6.5 ft Lane Width 10 ft Curb & Gutter Type Vertical Curb Width 1 ft Gutter Width 1 ft Bike Facility Type Shared lane Bike Lane Width - Bike Buffer Width - TYPICAL ADJACENT PRIVATE ALLEY EASEMENT 28 ft ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 62 MONTAVA | ©2018 DPZ CoDESIGN DRAFT 01/01/19 16 STREET TYPES 7B | CONNECTOR LOCAL WITH ATTACHED GREEN - T4, T3 7B | CONNECTOR LOCAL WITH ATT. GREEN (T4, T3) Right-of-Way 66 ft Roadway Width 48 ft Transect Zones T4, T3 Parking Lanes 2 Sidewalk 6 ft Parking Width 8 Parkway Type Varies Travel Lanes 2 Parkway Width 6 ft Lane Width 10 ft Curb & Gutter Type Vertical Curb Width 0.5 ft Gutter Width 1.5 ft Bike Facility Type Striped lane Bike Lane Width 6 ft Bike Buffer Width - TYPICAL ADJACENT PRIVATE ALLEY EASEMENT Where buildings exceed 30 ft, additional alley width is required to accom- modate fire access. providing local access, and in areas without driveways. September, 2016 Attachment 4 - Connector Local ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 63 MONTAVA | ©2018 DPZ CoDESIGN DRAFT 01/01/19 19 STREET TYPES 8 | PAIRED ONE-WAY LOCAL, T5 8 | PAIRED ONE-WAY LOCAL (T5) Right-of-Way 45 ft Roadway Width 20 ft Transect Zones T5 Parking Lanes 1 Sidewalk 8 ft Parking Width 8 Parkway Type Long tree well Travel Lanes 1 Parkway Width 6 ft Lane Width 12 ft Curb & Gutter Type Vertical Curb Width 0.5 ft Specifications are for each side of the Gutter Width 1.5 ft private median. Bike Facility Type Shared lane Bike Lane Width - Bike Buffer Width - TYPICAL ADJACENT PRIVATE ALLEY EASEMENT Where buildings exceed 30 ft, additional alley width is required to accommodate fire access. MONTAVA | ©2018 DPZ CoDESIGN DRAFT 01/01/19 18 STREET TYPES 8 | PAIRED ONE-WAY LOCAL, T4, T3 8 | PAIRED ONE-WAY LOCAL (T4, T3) Right-of-Way 45 ft Roadway Width 20 ft Transect Zones T4, T3 Parking Lanes 1 Sidewalk 5 ft Parking Width 8 Parkway Type Continuous Travel Lanes 1 Parkway Width 6 ft & 9 ft Lane Width 12 ft Curb & Gutter Type Vertical Curb Width 0.5 ft Specifications are for each side Gutter Width 1.5 ft of the private median. Bike Facility Type Shared lane Bike Lane Width - Bike Buffer Width - TYPICAL ADJACENT PRIVATE ALLEY EASEMENT Where buildings exceed 30 ft, additional alley width is required to accom- modate fire access. Attachment 5 - Local Paired One-way 50' 50' 10' 10' 10' 10' 50' 10' & 10' 53' 53' 10' 10' 10' 10' 53' 10' & 10' 5A 5B MONTAVA | ©2018 DPZ CoDESIGN DRAFT 01/01/19 18 STREET TYPES 8 | PAIRED ONE-WAY LOCAL, T4, T3 8A | PAIRED ONE-WAY LOCAL (T4, T3) Right-of-Way 50 ft Roadway Width 20 ft Transect Zones T4, T3 Parking Lanes 1 Sidewalk 5 ft Parking Width 8 Parkway Type Continuous Travel Lanes 1 Parkway Width 10 ft Lane Width 12 ft Curb & Gutter Type Vertical Curb Width 0.5 ft Specifications are for each side Gutter Width 1.5 ft of the private median. Bike Facility Type Shared lane Bike Lane Width - Montava PUD Master Plan PUD Design Narrative Fort Collins, Colorado HF2M | DPZ | BHA | Martin/Martin | Ruth Rollins Consult | Nelson/Nygaard | Liley Law Offices 7-23-2019 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 65 PUD Design Narrative 1 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Chapter 1 - Overview Project Title Montava PUD Master Plan (“Montava”) Project Team Developer – HF2M, Inc., Max Moss Master Planning – DPZ CoDesign, Matt Lambert Landscape Architect – BHA Design, Inc., Angela Milewski Civil Engineer – Martin/Martin, Peter Buckley Traffic Consultant – Ruth Rollins Consult, Ruth Rollins Traffic Engineer – Nelson/Nygaard, Pete Costa Legal Counsel – Liley Law Offices, LLC Lucia Liley Past Meeting Dates Montava has been planned in a comprehensive way with early engagement of City staff, utility providers, adjacent landowners, and subject experts. The process began in 2017 with a workshop with City departments, utility providers, the Poudre R-1 School District and adjacent significant landowners to establish each groups’ long-term goals for this area of the City. This was followed by an initial neighborhood meeting with nearly 100 attendees, culminating in a week-long design charette including multiple topic meetings, three public presentations, seven interim plans and a final master plan. Since that time, we have continued to coordinate with agencies and stakeholders to develop more detailed information on relevant issues including: - Scoping and preparing traffic studies to support a Master Street Plan amendment (including a second neighborhood meeting focused on this topic) - Locations for future schools for Poudre R-1 School District - Coordination with stormwater utilities regarding conveyance of off-site drainage and their long- range plans for this area - Assessment of land suitable for the 40-acre farm - Coordination with Park Planning and Natural Areas staff on how the plan can best support their long-term goals for the area - Developing strategies for affordable and attainable housing with city staff and many stakeholders - Energy efficiency opportunities in concert with the City Utilities and outside groups ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 66 PUD Design Narrative 2 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n While many informal meetings have been held with staff, agencies, neighborhood groups, and subject matter experts, the list of formal public meeting dates includes: September 25, 2017 – Pre-Charette Worksession with City, Utility Providers, PSD, others October 26, 2017 – Neighborhood Meeting November 15–20, 2017 – Master Planning Charette including open meetings and three public open house/presentations December 13, 2017 – City Council ODP Pre-application Hearing (prior to PUD Ordinance adoption) June 5, 2018 – Neighborhood Meeting September 25, 2018 - City Council PUD Pre-application Hearing October 11, 2018 – Neighborhood Meeting December 19, 2018 – Neighborhood Meeting General Project Description Montava is the result of an unprecedented collaborative effort over the past 18 months. The Applicant has been working with the Anheuser-Busch Foundation (“A-B”) to redevelop a collection of land parcels west of the current brewery and an approximately 108-acre parcel further west that is owned by the Poudre R-1 School District (“PSD”). The total land area of the PUD Master Plan is 999 acres. The design team includes national and international experts in Traditional Neighborhood Design, agri-urban developments, transportation planning and affordable housing design and construction. These experts have teamed with local design and engineering consultants, market experts, and technology leaders to create a comprehensive planning approach. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 67 PUD Design Narrative 3 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Montava PUD Annotated Master Plan ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 68 PUD Design Narrative 4 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Existing Zoning The land to be included in Montava totals approximately 999 acres, and is currently zoned (I) Industrial, (E) Employment, and (L-M-N) Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood. Applicant is taking this opportunity to plan a true New-Urbanist community with an integrated mix of uses including housing, employment, schools, parks, natural areas and agriculture. It is estimated that there will be approximately 4,200 dwelling units, approximately 450,000 to 750,000 square feet of nonresidential uses including commercial, industrial and employment uses with sufficient parking to support all such nonresidential uses, with buildings ranging in height from one to five stories. Please see the boundaries of the existing zone districts and the general layout of Montava on the Existing Zoning Plan below, and an explanation of the proposed uses in Chapter 2 of the PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities, and Development Standards. Montava PUD Master Plan – Existing Zoning Plan ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 69 PUD Design Narrative 5 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Existing Owners The majority of property is currently owned by A-B. A portion of the PUD Master Plan area is also currently owned by PSD: Owner: Anheuser-Busch Foundation (depicted in yellow below) Owner: Poudre R-1 School District (depicted in red below) Montava PUD Master Plan area – Existing Ownership Proposed Owners Applicant has an option to purchase from A-B. Poudre R-1 School District will continue to own a portion of the planned Montava area based on designated school sites. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 70 PUD Design Narrative 6 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Chapter 2 – Montava PUD Master Plan Description and Intent Montava PUD Master Plan 2.1 Overall Project Montava is a significant traditional neighborhood development infused with agrarian elements, expressing the site’s past and surrounding context. Montava is comprised of a series of connected neighborhoods, each unique in layout, character, intensity, and surroundings. All neighborhoods are compact and walkable, with some of a higher intensity and others lower in intensity. The site’s topography and open spaces permeate Montava, pulling natural areas and recreational spaces into the heart of the community. Focal Points There are two primary focal points in the design of Montava: the Town Center and the Farm. Both are connected by a central axis, oriented with Long’s Peak and organizing the design. To the southwest, the Town Center anchors Montava at Mountain Vista Drive and Timberline Road, supporting the future Community Park and future nearby development. To the northeast, the Farm and more agrarian-centric development blends into a natural area and stormwater corridor. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 71 PUD Design Narrative 7 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Design Montava’s design is derived by intersecting the site’s natural stormwater and topographic features with an overall orientation of streets towards Long’s Peak. Most streets are oriented to capture the view, which is most striking from the hill north on Giddings Road at the farm as well as at the Town Center from the main plaza. Four major stormwater corridors criss-cross the site, defining the edges of neighborhoods and a focal point at the Town Center square along Country Club Road. Each corridor is connected to a series of additional green corridors, providing walking and biking trails throughout the community, connecting to existing regional trails, and providing access to the City Park. The easternmost corridor is substantial in size, driven by off-site stormwater along the Cooper Slough. Working with Natural Areas staff, this corridor is designed as an amenity and pulled into the community’s identity through greenways. Transitions Development transitions along a transect of intensity from high to low across the site. Towards the Town Center and Mountain Vista Drive, development is generally of a higher intensity, including more mixed-use and multi-family. Outwards from the Town Center, development steps down in intensity towards existing neighborhoods, parks, the farm and natural areas. A small node of higher intensity is located at the top of the hill on Giddings Road, adjacent to the Farm. This node supports the northern neighborhood areas for convenience, while the Town Center supports a much wider area. Transects Montava is divided into five (5) transects which vary by the ratio and level of intensity of their natural, built and social components. Building design and placement varies along the transect. Towards the Town Center, buildings are taller, close together, and closer to the street. Away from the Town Center, buildings become lower in scale, further from the street and from each other. Rather than an abrupt change, the intensity feathers in stages from the most intense, Transect T5, to medium intensity in Transect T4, to lower intensity in Transects T3.2 and T3.1, and to the Farm, Transect T2. Each of these transects is composed of a mix of different building types and character. In the least intense transects, buildings are detached, single family, but vary in their sizes. The moderately intense areas, Transect T4, include a wide range of buildings including small single family houses, townhouses, duplexes, and small multi-family buildings. Finally Transect T5 is composed primarily of mixed-use buildings, employment, and multi-family housing. Near A-B and I-25, a portion of land is set aside for industrial and employment uses. School Sites Montava is fortunate to have three school sites, along with interest from a Montessori school. The elementary school is embedded within the neighborhoods, set away from major roadways yet easily accessible, and connected to local and regional trails. The middle school and high school are located together at Mountain Vista Drive and Giddings Road, where they will benefit from easy car and bus access while also connecting to the trail network. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 72 PUD Design Narrative 8 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Open Space, Parks, and Natural Areas / Nature in the City Open space in Montava is diverse and distributed, yet connected in a network. The Community Park is an asset to the whole neighborhood and those surrounding Montava. Within the development, the park anchors the western end and is easily accessible by trails and pedestrian-oriented streets. Along the eastern end is a large natural area and stormwater feature, lined with trails and connected to Montava’s greenways. The site is crossed by five internal greenways and ringed by a green trail system. Three greenways manage stormwater and provide trails and linear landscaping. The additional two greenways connect the natural areas and trail system into the center of Montava. The Town Center includes a square and plaza focused on active programming, along with smaller pocket parks and pedestrian ways. Neighborhoods include squares, greens, compact greens, community gardens, and pocket parks, located close to homes. The system provides a variety of spaces suited for different activities and lifestyles. In coordination with city staff, we have outlined how Montava can help to incorporated and achieve the City’s Nature in the City (NIC) goals: NIC Vision: A connected open space network accessible to the entire community that provides a variety of experiences and functional habitat for people, plants and wildlife.  The Montava Master Plan is surrounded on three sides by planned recreational, water conveyance and conservation open space.  The planned Montava open space creates connection to nature for those residing in the development while also provides wildlife movement corridors through the site, especially from north to south. NIC Goals: 1) Easy Access to Nature: Ensure every resident is within a 10-minute walk to nature from their home or workplace. 2) High Quality Natural Spaces: Conserve, create and enhance natural spaces to provide diverse social and ecological opportunities. 3) Land Stewardship: Shift the landscape aesthetic to more diverse forms that support healthy environments for people and wildlife.  The planned open space surrounding the Montava development, pocket parks interspersed throughout the development and Nature in the City specific elements provide, on average, easy access to nature within a 10-minute walk.  The addition of less traditional native landscape elements throughout the Montava project, ecological restoration enhancements planned for the No 8 ditch and incorporation of a working organic farm will provide diverse social and ecological opportunities for residents and visitors.  At least 2 NIC specific design elements will be incorporated into each Project Development Plan (PDP) submittal for Montava, like pocket nature parks, community gardens and nature play areas, supporting diverse landscape aesthetic and healthy environments for people and small wildlife like birds and butterflies. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 73 PUD Design Narrative 9 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n NIC Policies: The layout and design proposed in the Montava Master Plan (PUD) supports Fort Collins Nature in the City vision and goals in addition to these specific policies: NIC Connectivity Policies C1 – Increase connectivity for plant and wildlife species C2 – Increase connectivity for residents NIC Land Use and Development Policies LU6 – Support and protect the multiple values of the City’s ditch system LU10 – Promote and preserve urban agriculture that supports a triple-bottom-line approach Circulation System Montava’s circulation system is designed as an interconnected grid of pedestrian-oriented streets, supported by surrounding arterials. The grid is designed to easily connect vehicles to arterials and collectors, allowing local streets to remain low volume and pedestrian-oriented. Where development is more intense, wider sidewalks are provided to match increased pedestrian volumes. The bicycle network provides access throughout the community with dedicated lanes along arterials, collectors, and key local streets, an independent network of off-street trails, and a highly connected network of low volume local streets. In addition to the standard LCUASS standard cross-sections, additional street cross-sections are requested for consideration and approval. Current Land Use Code vs. PUD Master Plan Montava’s design relies upon coordination between development standards and the PUD Master Plan to achieve community goals. Generally, the standards and design of Montava are aligned with the vision and goals of the Land Use Code (LUC). Many similar topics are addressed in Montava’s development standards and the LUC, intending to produce walkable, mixed-use places with buildings and open spaces that work together harmoniously and in support of a shared public and social fabric. However, the LUC deals with new development, existing development that is not expressive of LUC goals, and the incremental process that encourages existing development to align more closely with contemporary goals. It is a hybrid code, including progressive form-based code elements with conventional elements addressing legacy development patterns. Montava’s development standards create a pure form-based code. They more effectively direct form-centric development by their ability to be targeted rather than anticipating a wide variety of potential applications. Montava’s plan and development standards together craft design of the project which, in turn, creates a large, diverse, walkable, mixed-use community and an interconnected series of neighborhoods, centers, and open spaces. 2.2 Compliance with PUD Overlay Regulations A. LUC 4.29(A) The Montava PUD Master Plan is consistent with the purposes of the PUD Overlay Regulations: ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 74 PUD Design Narrative 10 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n (1) Subsequent Project Development Plans and Final Plans within Montava will be governed by the Montava PUD Master Plan. (2) The Montava PUD Master Plan substitutes for and operates as the overall development plan for all real property within the approved PUD overlay. (3) Approval of the Montava PUD Master Plan will position a large undeveloped and underserved area of approximately 900 acres in Northeast Fort Collins for phased development. (4) The Montava PUD Master Plan embodies innovative community planning and site design to integrate natural systems, energy efficiency, aesthetics, higher design, engineering and construction standards and other community goals by enabling greater flexibility than permitted under the strict application of the Land Use Code, all in furtherance of adopted and applicable City plans and policies. See the Section 2.1, Sections 2.2.B(2) and (3) and Chapter 10 of this Design Narrative for detailed explanations. (5) The Montava PUD Master Plan allows greater flexibility in the mix and distribution of land uses, densities, and applicable development and zone district standards than would be achievable under the Land Use Code. See the Section 2.1 and Sections 2.2.B(2) and (3) of this Design Narrative for detailed explanations. B. LUC 4.29(B) The Montava PUD Master Plan advances the objectives of the PUD Overlay Regulations: (1) A conceptual level of collaborative design and planning efforts among City staff, agencies, neighborhood groups, consultants and subject matter experts led to the Montava PUD Master Plan. (2) and (3) Development of the Montava PUD Master Plan in a thoughtfully planned and long- term approach that ensures a high quality of urban design and provides significant public benefits not available or possible through traditional development procedures through one or more of the following: (a) Diversification in the Use of Land Most of the property has been owned by A-B since their brewery was constructed near I-25 and Mountain Vista Road. While the current Industrial and Employment zoning reflects this ownership and the potential for large expansions of the brewery and similar industries, A-B has no intention to use this land for large industrial expansions. By comprehensively master planning the A-B properties along with adjacent PSD properties through the PUD process, the development team is able to modify uses, densities and development standards to create a master planned community to best meet the goals of City Plan and the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. Montava supports a diversification of both public and private uses in a complete planned community. The plan envisions: - Parks, schools, trails and natural areas - A fire station, recreation center and library ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 75 PUD Design Narrative 11 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n - Mixed use, commercial, and residential uses - Industrial and employment uses, and - A 40-acre Farm, farmer’s market, and urban agriculture (b) Innovation in Development New Urbanism is an urban design movement which promotes environmentally friendly habits by creating walkable neighborhoods containing a wide range of housing and job types. Montava has been designed by the industry leader, DPZ, and New Urbanism resonates throughout. It will be further refined by our Town Urbanist, Lew Oliver. Lew’s experience in architecture and design of New Urbanist communities is unparalleled. Development of Montava will implement New Urbanism by one or more of the following: - Developing the master plan area as a series of neighborhoods with centers as applicable, in a walkable context; - Integrating a wide variety of housing types and intensities within neighborhoods; - Creating walkable streets and trails that can connect to meaningful destinations; - Distributing traffic through a network of connected streets; - Providing affordable housing opportunities. Creating a mixed-use Town Center integrated with surrounding neighborhood fabric; (c) Agri-Urban Development This is a concept promoted in the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. There will be an approximately 40-acre Farm in Montava. The land will either be donated or sold at a substantially discounted amount to a Cooperative which entity will in turn enter into a long-term lease with the farmers. A wide variety of high-quality, locally-grown produce from the farm will be available to the entire Fort Collins community. While there may be other uses on the farm in the long term, the primary business model is organic produce. (d) Zero Energy Ready Homes Residential development in Montava will be built to the Department of Energy’s Zero Energy Ready Home “ZERH” standard. (e) Non-potable Water System There is only one quarter section of land within Montava that does not have adequate coffin wells to provide irrigation water for that quarter section. In all other areas, the Developer commits to the development of a non-potable water system which will incorporate the historical usage of these wells for the irrigation needs of Montava. (f) Affordable/Workforce Housing At least ten percent (10%) of the total housing units approved in the Montava PUD Master Plan will be affordable or workforce housing, whether owner-occupied or leased, ranging from sixty percent (60%) to one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the Fort Collins’ AMI for a family of four which will be provided through a combination of mechanisms by the Applicant and the City. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 76 PUD Design Narrative 12 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n (g) Housing Variety Housing variety is a critical element of building a Traditional Neighborhood Design community. DPZ specializes in designing communities with a tremendous, and beautiful, integration of diverse and wide-ranging housing options. When done intentionally, and with the best expertise available, this housing variety creates an incredible living environment that is unlike most of what has been built in the past 40+ years in our country. (h) Employment Employment opportunities exist where highly educated and innovative people live, and where community services and amenities are offered to those employees. The Applicant is working to create a place where employers will want to open businesses, and their innovative employees will want to live. The Developer has made room in the appropriate areas of Montava for employment uses. (i) Innovation Innovation is taking many forms in Montava. The Applicant is working with Colorado State University in multiple areas including agriculture, waste water, energy and affordable housing. The Applicant is working with global leader, Siemens, in partnership with Fort Collins Utility Services to create an innovative integration of technology around both energy and daily life. The Applicant intends to make Fort Collins Broadband a foundational technology for every home owner from the beginning of the project. (j) More Efficient Use of Land and Energy Through large scale comprehensive master planning, land uses, densities, transportation systems, regional and on-site storm water detention/conveyance, and open space areas can be established to allow a more efficient use of land and energy. The approximately 999-acre Montava project is comprehensively master-planned, with an emphasis on multi-modal transportation. Montava will include coordinated, interconnecting trail, street, sidewalk, transit as practical, and storm drainage systems which will both (i) help to correct existing infrastructure deficiencies within the boundaries of the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan; and (ii) provide opportunities to connect infrastructure in such area to existing City infrastructure. In addition to the Zero Energy Ready Homes commitment described above, the Developer is also: • Working with Fort Collins Utility Services to create a community that is founded on renewable energy use, energy conservation, with community wide impact. An example could include every home having a battery which is charged at night by the City’s wind turbine power generation and used during the day by Utility Services for solar smoothing. • Exploring a community-wide “in home” conservation approach to purchase water for the development with a master meter, thus eliminating the need for excessive water dedications which are needed to account for individual variations in use, and achieving a substantial savings in overall water use. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 77 PUD Design Narrative 13 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n (k) Public Amenities Commensurate with the Scope of the Montava Development Montava establishes significant public amenities envisioned for this area in a comprehensive community vision. The master plan includes a 40-acre working Farm, a Community Park, schools, natural areas, trails, and civic spaces to create a complete neighborhood in the Mountain Vista area. Community Park: Integration is at the heart of what Montava represents. The Applicant is working with the City’s Park Planning staff to create an approximately 80-acre Community Park to be an activity and enjoyment hub northeast Fort Collins. The intent is to plan the Montava community in concert with the park; with the Town Center, bike paths, road circulation and neighborhoods to connect with and embrace the park as an integral part of the neighborhood design – different that many of our Community Parks have been developed in the past. The intention is to activate this park from the beginning of the development of Montava, not in the distant future as the current Parks and Recreation Policy Plan indicates. Note that the 2008 Parks and Recreation Policy Plan indicates the Northeast park planned in this area as a 100-acre park site; scheduled as the last community park to be constructed in the Fort Collins park system with development occurring 2025 or later. The Mountain Vista Subarea Plan (2009) indicates that future programming needs for the community park in this area are between 100 to 120 acres in size. Although the Montava plan varies from these initial plans, as it is being master planned in concert with the differing land uses now envisioned for the area, with the extended trail systems and with the large areas of natural spaces throughout the community, we believe the park will be an integral part of Montava and the entire northeast Fort Collins area. Natural Areas: The Applicant is working to provide natural areas in several ways, including the naturalization of over 160 acres of storm water land to become a beautiful natural amenity for the entire area, while protecting all of east Fort Collins from floods. The Applicant will also be incorporating Nature in the City in appropriate locations throughout Montava. Regional Trail: We have been working with Parks Planning staff to accommodate the alignment of a portion of the future Northeast Paved Recreational Trail though Montava along the alignment of the No. 8 Outlet Ditch, as indicated in the 2013 Paved Recreational Trail Master Plan. Community Services: The Town Center is intended to include uses like community retail and commercial opportunities. The Applicant intends to partner with the City to develop a Community Recreation Center and, with the Poudre River Public Library District, to develop a library for the next generation. Fire Station: The Applicant is working with Poudre Fire Authority to allow and support a location for a planned fire station within Montava. (l) and (m) Furtherance of the City’s Adopted Plans and Policies The comprehensive planning of Montava and each of the elements above are based on the principles and policies and the fundamental vision of City Plan, Mountain Vista ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 78 PUD Design Narrative 14 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Subarea Plan, among others. Please see the list of comprehensive plan policies advanced by Montava in Chapter 10. (4) Working with the City on an amendment to the City’s Master Street Plan and the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan has provided opportunities for cooperative planning and development among real property owners within the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan (5) The Montava PUD Master Plan protects land uses and neighborhoods adjacent to the PUD from negative impacts by locating development of higher intensity in the centrally located Town Center and stepping down the intensity of development near the existing land uses and neighborhoods adjacent to the perimeter of the PUD. In addition, the proposed layout of the PUD incorporates parks, natural areas and open space to provide a buffer between the PUD and adjacent uses. C. LUC 4.29(D)(2) The Montava PUD Master Plan satisfies the PUD criteria for approval of a PUD Master Plan: (1) The Montava PUD Master Plan achieves the purposes and objectives of Sections 4.29(A) and (B). See the discussion of the PUD Master Plan purposes and objectives above in Subsections 2.2.A and 2.2.B of this Chapter 2. (2) The Montava PUD Master Plan provides high quality urban design within the subject properties. See the discussion of high-quality design above in Subsection 2.1 of this Chapter 2 and in the PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities, and Development Standards. (3) The Montava PUD Master Plan will result in development generally in compliance with the principles of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and adopted plans and policies. See the list of policies furthered by the Montava PUD Master Plan in Chapter 10. (4) The Montava PUD Master Plan will result in compatible design and use as well as public infrastructure and services. See Subsections 2.2.B(j) and (k) of this Chapter 2 above and the discussion of compatibility in Chapter 6. (5) The Montava PUD Master Plan is consistent with applicable Land Use Code General Development Standards (Article 3) except to the extent such development standards have been modified pursuant to the PUD Master Plan Standards. 2.3 Vested Property Rights The Developer is seeking vested property rights in connection with the Montava PUD Master Plan in accordance with LUC 4.29.K and, therefore, has submitted a request for vested property rights to the City Council concurrently with this PUD Master Plan. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 79 PUD Design Narrative 15 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Chapter 3 – Architectural Design Intent Building design within Montava is based on a number of standards in Chapters 4 through 13 of the PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities, and Development Standards. Current LUC standards concerning character are aimed at minimizing the impact of suburban development patterns and buildings by ensuring variety within a single structure, particularly in commercial and multi-family areas. Development within Montava differs from the LUC as it is oriented towards LUC goals at its core, and based upon character, not style, as a community-wide element of design. Due to the scale of Montava, specific stylistic details and materials may change by neighborhood. At the overall PUD level, architectural character standards address broad but common details to be further supplemented. The architectural character chapter deals with basic material prohibitions, the combination of materials, the shape of openings, orientation of building shape for solar access, the location of mechanical systems and refuse storage, and outbuilding design. This set of foundational standards are extended in Chapter 5 of the PUD Master Plan Standards by frontage standards, minimum glazing, fence and wall standards, shopfronts, and site design requirements that ensure building orientation is generally towards street, not parking areas. Together these ensure an overall harmony among buildings within Montava yet allow for more specific architectural detail to be determined by phase. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 80 PUD Design Narrative 16 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Chapter 4 - Transportation Improvements Montava provides a mixed-use neighborhood design with a balanced multimodal network focused on building community connections through sustainable transportation investments. Montava supports a traditional grid pattern for shorter, convenient distances for walking and biking, connections to destinations, and better distribution of multimodal traffic, and greater access to transit access and routing. The proposed street design would allow for adequate pedestrian/bicycle zones, and capacity for general traffic, transit and parking/loading. In addition the entire area would comprise a mix of protected bike lanes, shared travel lanes, multi-use pathways within open spaces areas, and enhanced intersections for safer bicycle and pedestrian crossings and promote slow-turning vehicles. The Transportation Impact Study (TIS) provided a comprehensive evaluation of Montava and examined the extent to which the project would affect the surrounding circulation network. Per the City’s significance criteria in identifying any potential adverse effects to existing or future transportation facilities associated with Montava, the TIS documented a number of proposed on- and off-site traffic intersection improvements to reduce any potential impacts to such facilities. These are presented in the summary table below. The Proposed Street Network for Montava and the surrounding area is depicted on the following page. Location of arterial and collector streets are consistent with the anticipated amended Master Street Plan. Intersection Mitigation Measure Mountain Vista Drive / Turnberry Road  Install traffic signal Mountain Vista Drive / Timberline Road  Install traffic signal  Add left-turn pockets and protected phases at northbound, eastbound, and westbound approaches Mountain Vista Drive / Giddings Road  Install traffic signal  Add left-turn pockets to all intersection approaches  Add right-turn pockets at westbound and southbound approaches Mountain Vista Drive / Busch Drive Install traffic signal Mountain Vista Drive / I-25 Southbound Ramp Install traffic signal Mountain Vista Drive / I-25 Northbound Ramp  Install traffic signal  Add left-turn pocket at northbound approach  Add protected, left-turn phases at northbound and eastbound approaches Timberline Road / Vine Drive Widen northbound approach to include exclusive left-turn lane (protected phase), one through lane, and one shared through-right turn lane and optimize signal Conifer Street / Turnberry Road (planned) Install traffic signal Turnberry Road / Suniga Drive (planned) Install traffic signal Timberline Road / Suniga Drive (planned) Install traffic signal Giddings Road / Conifer Street (planned) Install traffic signal ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 81 PUD Design Narrative 17 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Proposed Street Network – Montava and Surrounding Area ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 82 PUD Design Narrative 18 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Chapter 5 – Natural Features Protection An Ecological Characterization Study (ECS) has been prepared for Montava to assess and identify any natural habitats or features that have significant ecological value. Montava generally consists of croplands, so it has limited natural vegetation or habitat areas. Several small wetland areas associated with crop irrigation areas exist within Montava. The most significant features include the No. 8 Canal, a steep-banked irrigation conveyance channel along the west side, and an existing tree with an active Red- Tail Hawk nest identified. In addition to the ECS, a jurisdictional determination has been received from the US Army Corps of Engineers identifying the two wetland areas that are determined to be jurisdictional. These include the wetlands associated with the banks of the No. 8 Canal, and a short irrigation ditch that connects directly into the No. 8 Canal. In general, the majority of the site will be changed and regraded to accommodate development of the planned uses. The nesting tree will be protected in place and be incorporated into the large natural area/open space feature along the east side of Montava. The area planned for the Farm will remain intact and be improved for future cultivation. The No. 8 Canal will remain in place and continue to serve its purpose for delivery of water. However, it is planned to be improved and realigned with less-steep banks, improved ditch access, nearby trails and a buffer of native vegetation to become a safer and more valuable natural feature for Montava and the nearby communities. Plans for a portion of the Northeast Paved Regional Trail as shown in the 2013 Paved Recreational Trail Master Plan is anticipated and illustrated along the alignment of the No. 8 Canal. Proposed Improvements to the No. 8 Canal ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 83 PUD Design Narrative 19 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n An Existing Conditions and Natural Features Plan has been prepared for the PUD Master Plan indicating the planned Limits of Development and buffer zones from the features indicated in the ECS. It also includes notes of compliance with LUC Section 3.4.1 and a table of both jurisdictional and non- jurisdictional features with the understanding that any areas disturbed by construction will be mitigated in accordance with the US Army Corps of Engineers permit process and the LUC at the time of PDP for each phase. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 84 PUD Design Narrative 20 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Chapter 6 – Neighborhood Compatibility Montava has been evolving and since the fall of 2017 with significant public outreach and stakeholder engagement. As enumerated above, this measured approach to establishing the goals of the community, stakeholders and adjacent neighborhoods has allowed a thoughtful design that not only furthers the community and area goals but is supportive and compatible with the adjacent neighborhoods. Some of these characteristics are restated here: Development and Density Transitions Development transitions along a transect of intensity from high to low across the site. Towards the Town Center (near the intersection of Timberline Road and Mountain Vista Drive), and along the Mountain Vista Drive corridor, development is generally of a higher intensity, including more mixed-use and multi-family. Outwards from the Town Center, development steps down in intensity towards existing neighborhoods, parks, the Farm and natural areas, to be compatible with existing neighborhoods to the west. Towards the Town Center, buildings are taller, close together, and closer to the street. Away from the Town Center buildings become lower in scale, further from the street and from each other. Rather than an abrupt change, the intensity feathers in stages from the most intense, Transect T5, to medium intensity in Transect T4, to lower intensity in Transects T3.2 and T3.1, and to the Farm Transect T2. Each of these transects is composed of a mix of different building types and character. In the least intense transects, buildings are detached, single family, but vary in their sizes. The moderately intense areas, Transect T4, include a wide range of buildings including small single-family houses, townhouses, duplexes, and small multi-family buildings. And finally Transect T5, which is composed primarily of mixed-use buildings, employment, and multi-family housing. Land Use Transitions The higher intensity uses, including more mixed-use and multi-family occur near the Town Center with lower intensity uses and residential to the west to transition to the Storybook neighborhood. The future Community Park has been located northwest of the Town Center to be centrally located within both Montava and surrounding neighborhoods to the west. Intensity of use also feathers to the north and east. An elementary school site is planned within the neighborhoods near Maple Hill. A small node of higher intensity is located at the top of the hill on Giddings Road, adjacent to the farm. This node supports the northern neighborhood areas for convenience, while the Town Center supports a much wider area of the Mountain Vista neighborhoods. The regional and on-site stormwater detention and conveyance have been designed primarily along the east border of the property, providing a larger more functional natural area and a buffer of distance and open space from the railroad and the brewery to the east. The higher intensity uses such as the planned PSD high school/middle school site are planned further east near Mountain Vista Drive and Giddings Road to allow for nearby access to these arterial roads. Industrial and Employment uses are planned near A-B and the I-25 Interchange at Mountain Vista Drive. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 85 PUD Design Narrative 21 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Chapter 7 – Historic Preservation Summary A Phase I Environmental Assessment and Ecological Characterization Study has been prepared for Montava. While there are a few existing structures and residences on the site relating to the agricultural operations that are in place, no historic structures exist on the property. The majority of the site will be changed and regraded to accommodate development of the planned uses, and we do not anticipate reuse of any of the existing structures in the future development plans. Any demolition or alteration of existing structures will be conducted in accordance with the City’s codes. Planned improvements to the No. 8 Canal may require review by the State Historic Preservation Office. This determination and any required permitting for the planned improvements to the canal will take place at the time of the PDP application for the initial phase that impacts the ditch. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 86 PUD Design Narrative 22 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Chapter 8 – Development Phasing Schedule A Phasing Plan is included with the PUD Master Plan submittal. The intent is to begin the initial phases of Montava near the intersection of Timberline Road and Mountain Vista Drive. Based on the phasing plan, the construction will move north along Timberline Road beginning in 1A to 1B, 2A. The Farm area will also be included in these initial phases as indicated on the plan. Future phases may vary dependent upon market conditions. While market conditions will dictate start dates and completion dates, infrastructure improvements are projected near the end of 2019, with phase one housing being built in 2020. The product absorption is targeted at approximately 150 units per year. Commencement of construction of the Farm and support structures is projected in 2019 with farming operations beginning in 2020. Each phase will require a PDP and Final Plan review with design of appropriate infrastructure suitable for each phase. Infrastructure phasing is currently being discussed and developed with City staff to determine the timing and scope of infrastructure required for the initial phases. Given the lack of infrastructure in this area, it is expected that a significant amount of the public improvements will need to be installed in the early phases of development. In particular, stormwater and drainage improvements will need to be installed as necessary to ensure there is no downstream impact above the existing condition as new development occurs. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 87 PUD Design Narrative 23 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Conceptual Development Phasing Plan ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 88 PUD Design Narrative 24 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Chapter 9 – Metro District and HOA Establishment and Responsibilities The guiding principles of the Applicant in developing Montava are: • Create a unique complete community • Develop an incomparable sense of place • Add long term value • Establish the central character of agri-urbanism and open space • Build community through design Vibrant enduring communities depend upon all their stakeholders working together to uphold community standards and achieve the vision and goals for the community. The stakeholders will include the Applicant, associations or districts, the home owners, the builders, and others having a role in the functioning of the community and in helping fulfill that vision. Montava will likely be overseen and maintained by metropolitan districts, a master HOA, an architectural control committee, and other boards as deemed necessary. The Montava Metropolitan District Nos. 1-7 (the “Districts”) are quasi-municipal corporations and political subdivisions of the State of Colorado, formed pursuant to Sections 32-1-101, et. seq., C.R.S. (the “Special District Act”). The Districts are organized for the purpose of financing the cost of public improvements and providing services related to such public improvements. The Districts are authorized by the Special District Act to provide many types of public improvements, subject to limitations in the Service Plan approved by the City, including: streets, safety protection, parks and recreation, water, sanitation, transportation, mosquito control, television relay and translation, and fire protection improvements. The Districts anticipate providing services for all of those things that it has statutory authority for and that are not the responsibility of the City or other entities: examples are landscaping, parks, and open space, contracting for uniform trash service throughout the Districts, operation and management of potable and non-potable water systems within the Districts’ boundaries and participating in social programs through its park and recreation authority, and the management and enforcement of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). While most community management and amenities will be supported by the Districts, some things may require a master HOA because the Districts’ charter will not allow their support. These items include primarily community activation through activities that could include but not be limited to holiday or seasonal events, farmers markets, farm operations integration with the community, 4th of July celebrations, concerts, art shows and theatre performances, food services and many other things. These activities will be the heartbeat of Montava. Montava is intended to be a very active and diverse community with meaningful programming to create a special community connection. The majority of this programming described in the preceding paragraph will be necessarily managed by a master HOA. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 89 PUD Design Narrative 25 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Chapter 10 –Policy and Public Benefit Analysis City Plan Compliance Montava addresses and complies with a multiplicity of City Plan objectives. They are identified by category area. City Plan’s Economic Health objectives (EH 1.1, 1.2, 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4): 1. Supporting the enhancement of the community’s economic base and job creation by enabling well over $1,000,000,000 of construction and development, unique place making that attracts employees and employers to the region, the development of commercial town center, and eventual development of approximately 500,000 sf of office and industrial space Jobs live in houses. 2. Supporting the overall Fort Collins retail tax base by bringing thousands of residents back into the full time daily life of Fort Collins instead of living in someone else’s tax base and spending money there and not in Fort Collins. 3. Supporting the regional innovation ecosystem that fuels business development and job creation by leveraging local assets including human capital, research institutions, industrial base, physical infrastructure and quality of life. This is done by developing the most innovative community in the nation including Zero Energy Ready Homes, innovating in energy and water conservation, partnering with CSU on opportunities from energy to farming, integrating with the Fort Collins Utility on innovative initiatives that impact the entire customer base, and much more. 4. Enabling collaboration with the business community, various business organizations, educational institutions including CSU and PSD, and economic development organizations to encourage and support a healthy economy, provide employment opportunities, increase private investment, and improve the quality of life for all Fort Collins residents. This will be done by the development of the Farm, the public facilities such as the Recreation Center and Library, improving public infrastructure, and more. 5. Developing a community that is a national leader in energy and water conservation, urban agriculture, affordable housing integration and home diversity. Montava will enable both the support of and the creation of unique local businesses. It will also support the brewing industry with an increased customer base and increasing retail space for prospective brewery locations, and provide a foundation for incubating new and existing businesses in a creative and thriving community environment. City Plan Environmental Health objectives (EH 1.1, 2.1, 4.1, 4.3, 5.4, 5.8, 7.9, 7.10, 9.1, 11.1, 13.1, 15.5, 18.1,2,3,4, 19.1, 20.4 and more). 1. Protecting and enhancing natural resources in many ways including: a) the improvement of #8 ditch; b) restoration and or protection of identified wetland areas; and c) the development of over 160 acres of natural areas land in partnership with the City’s Natural Areas program. 2. Maintaining a system of publicly owned open lands by partnering with the Fort Collins Natural Areas to create over 160 acres of natural lands. This land will be incorporated into a plan to provide both educational and enjoyment opportunities for the entire community. 3. Committing to explore opportunities for land conservation in partnership with Stormwater, Parks and Recreation, Transportation and Natural Areas throughout the community. The areas ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 90 PUD Design Narrative 26 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n of primary interest are the #8 ditch improvement on the west along with the Community Park and the storm water and natural areas partnerships on the east. 4. Committing to work with the City to explore and execute opportunities for Stormwater, Parks and Recreation, and Natural Areas to partner on improving water quality and contributing to ecological functioning of urban watersheds. This can be accomplished throughout the community. 5. Committing to support the use of renewable energy throughout the community in the layout and construction of new development. Montava will be the largest Zero Energy Ready Home development in the nation. 6. Committed to participate in research, development and demonstration efforts of all relevant types to remain at the forefront of emerging technologies and innovative solutions regarding the energy performance of new construction. This will be done both by partnerships with the City, but also by partnering with the most progressive and innovative builders in the country like Thrive Homes and Mandalay. 7. Being a leader in the region in incorporating electrical storage into the design of the community for both residential and commercial use. 8. Being a leader in the region in utilizing smart grid technologies to facilitate higher levels of integration of renewable energy, energy storage and demand response systems to support community scale net energy use reduction. This can be done with technology from companies like Siemens, by working through innovative home builders such as Thrive and Mandalay, and partnering with the City of Fort Collins. 9. Promoting alternative and efficient transportation fuels and vehicles that improve air quality. This will be done by various means including the homes being built to enable vehicle charging, as well as innovative systems that allow integration of electric cars into the grid system. 10. Offering, through its master HOA or Districts’ operations and management, education, programs and other assistance to citizens and local businesses interested in reducing their environmental impacts. 11. Providing education and promoting the City’s goals for reducing all types of municipal sold waste at the source to divert discarded material from the landfill. Through it’s Districts, Montava will provide trash service from one single hauler for the entire community. This will enable one consistent message of education and encouragement for reaching the city’s goals of reduced waste. 12. Recognizing and managing flood plains with the intent to provide balance between economic, environmental, and human considerations. Montava will seek to minimize risk to life and property by design of and impact on the floodplain. Montava will recognize that maintenance, restoration, and enhancement of natural areas and the beneficial functions of flood plains is a concurrent goal with reducing flood damage. Montava will develop structures and facilities necessary consistent with the intent fo the standards and criteria of the /c/it’s of Fort Collins and National Flood Insurance Program. 13. Designing stormwater systems to minimize introduction fo human causes pollutants and designing tributary systems for water quality control with appropriate use of buffer areas, grass swales, detention ponds, etc. 14. Partnering with the City and Natural Areas to employ public/private partnerships to optimize the balance between Stormwater management and compact development. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 91 PUD Design Narrative 27 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n City Plan Neighborhood Livability Principles and Policies (LIV 1.3, 5.4, 6.2, 6.3, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 8.1, 8.5, 9.1, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 11.1, 11.2, 13.3, 14.1, 14.2, 14.3, 21.1, 21.2, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 22.5, 22.6, 22.7, 23.1, 23.2, 24.1, 24.2, 42.2, 44.1,2,3,4,5, and more): 1. Continuing to collaborate with Larimer County and adjacent communities to plan the edges of the Fort Collins GMA. 2. Pursuing options for development that helps contribute to the additional public amenities needed in areas where redevelopment occurs. This is necessary to transform NE Fort Collins into distinct places with identifiable character and more marketable frontage that promotes development. 3. Continuing to encourage design that complements, extends or enhances positive qualities of surrounding development and adjacent buildings in terms of general intensity and use, street pattern and identifiable style. Compatibility does not mean uniformity. 4. Encouraging the addition of new services, conveniences, and/or gathering places in the area that lacks these facilities. 5. Leading the way in encouraging and developing a variety of housing types and densities. 6. Contributing substantially to maintaining an adequate supply of housing. 7. Pursuing strategies to enable Accessory Dwelling Units. 8. Within the scope of its open space, park, and farm limitations, maximizing residential development land positively influencing housing affordability, as outlined above. 9. Being a leader in supporting the development and provision of affordable housing in the community. Montava has made significant commitments for the provision of at least 10% of the overall housing constructed to be in the 60-120% range of AMI. 10. Employing a planning strategy that integrates affordable housing throughout the community. This is a critical component fo the overall design and DNA of Montava. 11. Building on the Zero Energy Ready Home Standard and WaterSense throughout the entire community. By using a non potable irrigation system Montava will also conserve on potable water for irrigation use. 12. Being a leader in designing safe, functional, and visually appealing streets. Our street sections, being New Urbanist and design focused in nature, will add to the overall aesthetic of the community as a whole. 13. Utilizing street trees to reinforce, define and connect the spaces and corridors created by buildings and other features along the streets. 14. We intend to implement “dark sky” standards throughout the community as practical, and tailor lighting fixture design and illumination to match the context of the street. 15. Placing civic facilities and grounds in prominent and central locations as highly visible focal points. 16. Incorporating public spaces and activities such as plazas, pocket parks, patios, children’s play areas, sidewalks, pathways, “street furniture” in a wide variety of development types. 17. Establishing gateway design into the community including features such as building architecture, landscaping, signage, lighting incorporating these elements within the immediate entrance to the community. 18. Incorporating unique landscape features into the design and architecture of the development. 19. Promoting functional landscape by implementing practical solutions to ensure landscape design is functional in providing such elements as visual appeal, shade, foundation edge to buildings, buffers, safety, and enhancements to the built environment. 20. Working with CSU horticulture to design the landscaping based on maintainability over the life cycle of the project using proper soil amendment and ground preparation practices, as well as ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 92 PUD Design Narrative 28 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n the appropriate use of hardscape elements, trees, mulches, turf grass and other plant materials. Montava intends to implement and manage a non potable irrigation system. 21. Establishing an interconnected network of neighborhood streets and sidewalks, including automobile, bicycle and pedestrian routes within the community. 22. Designing a walkable community with walkable blocks. 23. Designing a street system created to be traffic calming. 24. To the extent public transit is available, designing it accessible to the community. 25. Developing Montava’s design to encompass all of the items listed in in LIV 22, emphasizing creativity, diversity, and individuality, with a responsive context while developing a comfortable and interesting community. DPZ is the world leader in this type of community design. Housing models will have distinct variety, with creative multi family design, buildings oriented toward the street, garage doors de-emphasized with mostly alley entrances, creating visually appealing street scapes with enhanced street designs, and the community was built to orient toward the Long’s Peak Mountain View. 26. Designing to incorporate many parks and park experiences throughout the community. This design not only brings park and open space experiences to the community, but orients the homes to these places bringing visibility and connectivity to them as well. Montava has also been extensively designed to protect, enhance, and connect the community with natural areas and wetland areas. 27. Working with PSD and others to make sure we are wisely integrating school facilities as integral parts of this complete community. We are coordinating the siting of these schools with PSD and fostering a sense of community with neighborhood schools. 28. Encouraging agricultural uses by developing a 40 acre farm to serve the entire community with Native Hill Farms. 29. Incorporating all the concepts listed in LIV 44 including open lands, parks and water corridors to form an interconnected system that provides habitat essential to the conservation of plants, animals, and their associated ecosystems. At the same time this entire system is designed to serve the needs for drainage and water conveyance, and provides opportunities for recreation, education and other activities. City Plan Safety and Wellness objectives (SW 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.5, 2.3, 2.4, 3.1, 3.4): 1. Working with the Poudre Fire Authority from the beginning to locate the next fire station in the appropriate area. Applicant also intends to work with the police department to serve the needs of providing a safe and effective fire and police connection with our community. 2. Building a sense of community throughout which will lead to community pride and involvement. This type of community also fosters care for your neighbors, which enhances safety for all. 3. Continue to consider public safety in all aspects of design. 4. Designing to support active transportation including a wide ranging and connected bicycle network that is intended to provide connection from all of NE Fort Collins to the downtown area and beyond. Montava is also a community designed for pedestrians, and intended to de- emphasize automobile traffic. 5. Designing to promote active living and physical activity with the development of parks, trail networks, rec center, natural areas, and more. 6. As an agri-urban designed community, promoting and encouraging community gardens and markets. This will be a very overt part of Montava from active farmers market activities to intentional community connection with the Farm. This will also enhance the regional food ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 93 PUD Design Narrative 29 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n system by enabling the farm to expand from its current size to 40 acres. This will enable much more of our community to be served with locally grown vegetables. Community gardens are also intended to be encouraged and enabled. City Plan Culture Parks and Recreation objectives (CPR 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 4.1, 4.2, 5.2, and more): 1. Arts and Culture are very important to the community atmosphere Montava intends to develop. To the extent feasible Montava intends to participate in the development of historic and cultural facilities in its Town Center to enhance Montava as a cultural destination. This could include performing, historical, and visual arts opportunities. 2. Certainly Montava will incorporate public art throughout the community to create and enhance the unique identities of our agri urban development style with the rest of Fort Collins. 3. The Montava development team is already working with local stakeholders of the arts community to identify ways to promote and increase visibility of the arts in Montava. This could take the form of a space at the farm that encourages and promotes artists, integrating art training and shows into other facility’s in the town center including the library and education facilities. 4. Montava intends to be a vehicle to help build the identity of Fort Collins as a world class cultural center and destination. Montava is a destination community, and this connection is organic. 5. Montava development will participate in exploring funding options both private and public to encourage and nurture a strong arts and culture industry. 6. Montava, in partnership with local stakeholders, can very well become a resource to local artist and culture community organizations. And intends to do so. 7. Montava development will encourage partnerships between educational, cultural and business institutions to improve opportunities for learning and expand the creative industries employment base in Fort Collins. The art culture is critical to community, and will be critical to the Montava community. 8. Montava is designed to develop and maintain a well balanced system of parks, trails, and recreation facilities to provide a variety of recreational opportunities. This can be seen in the master plan. 9. This will be a well integrated and interconnected system both within Montava and from NE Fort Collins to the overall region. This includes trails, ditches, schools, open lands, and neighborhood centers. It is the essence of the entire Montava design. 10. Montava has been working with, and will continue to work with, multiple city departments including Parks and Rec, Natural Areas, Transportation, Stormwater, etc to provide multi purpose parks and open lands to maximize available resources. 11. Montava supports the vision and guiding principles of the 2008 Parks and Recreation Policy Plan by integrating the community park directly into the design of the master plan for the community. We have been working with the City’s Park Planning staff and have designated an approximately 80-acre Community Park site to be an activity and enjoyment hub northeast Fort Collins. The intent is to plan the Montava community in concert with the park; with the Town Center, bike paths, road circulation and neighborhoods to connect with and embrace the park as an integral part of the neighborhood design – different that many of our Community Parks have been developed in the past. The intention is to activate this park from the beginning of the development of Montava, not in the distant future as the current Parks and Recreation Policy Plan indicates. Note that the 2008 Parks and Recreation Policy Plan indicates the Northeast park planned in this area as a 100-acre park site; scheduled as the last community park to be ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 94 PUD Design Narrative 30 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n constructed in the Fort Collins park system with development occurring 2025 or later. The Mountain Vista Subarea Plan (2009) indicates that future programming needs for the community park in this area are between 100 to 120 acres in size. Although the Montava plan varies from these initial plans, as it is being master planned in concert with the differing land uses now envisioned for the area, with the extended trail systems and with the large areas of natural spaces throughout the community, we believe the park will be an integral part of Montava and the entire northeast Fort Collins area. 12. Montava supports the 2013 Paved Recreational Trail Master Plan by providing a plan for implementing a portion of the future Northeast Paved Recreational Trail though Montava along the alignment of the No. 8 Outlet Ditch as indicated in the plan. City Plan High Performing Community (HI 2.1, 3.3, 4.1, 5.2, and more): 1. The Montava development team has been and will continue to chordate with the community’s world class educational institutions including PSD, CSU, and others to uphold the excellent educational system that contributes to the city’s high quality of life. This is being done by development of partnerships, and the design and integration of these institutions needs into the community. 2. Montava is designed to create a community that works together to solve problems collectively and creatively. These include everything from waste water, trash service, energy conservation, and affordable housing. 3. Montava is a partnership forming development. By developing and growing partnerships with the many stakeholders in this wonderful community, Montava can be and become a catalyst for lasting community partnerships. 4. While being managed overall by District, Montava will be a very publicly transparent operation and community. City Plan Transportation objectives (T 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 4.3, 4.4, 5.4, 8.2, 9.2, 11, 12, and more): 1. Montava is designed to support the city’s framework of transportation that balances access, mobility, safety and emergency response while working to reduce the rate of growth of vehicle miles of travel. This is being done by developing a walkable community that has local services, is trial connected, and pedestrian oriented. 2. Montava will work with the City of Fort Collins as the overall Transit strategy is implemented throughout the city. 3. The transportation network enabled by Montava will support expanded economic opportunity and development generally. 4. Montava is designed to promote pedestrian activity and connectivity throughout the community. 5. Montava is designed to promote bicycle activity by providing an integrated trail system that is both connected within Montava, and to the region generally. 6. Montava’s design is purposeful about integrating neighborhood streets while protecting neighborhoods from excessive cut through traffic. 7. Montava’s design incorporates street systems that create safe and attractive environments for pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. 8. Montava’s development team is very committed to leading the efforts to create regional connectivity in trails. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 95 PUD Design Narrative 31 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n 9. Montava is designed to support active living with the integration of parks, trails, natural areas, and much more. 10. Montava provides a very high level of design and support for the interface of pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit where available as a fundamental consideration in the community design. Access to each of these will be designed to be safe, secure, attractive, and convenient for residents. 11. One of the most important and integral components of the overall Montava design is it’s commitment to and care for the bicycling community. One of our biggest points of effort and energy has been in creating a development that provides a safe, easy, convenient, and integrated and connected bicycling mobility option for all ages and abilities. This can easily be seen in the overall design of the community as one of our highest priorities. 12. The pedestrian network in Montava is a priority, and will provide a safe, easy, and convenient mobility option for all ages and abilities. DPZ is the world leader in walkable, pedestrian oriented community development. This is why they were hired, because this is a critical element to Montava’s overall design. Mountain Vista SubArea Plan Compliance Supported Principles and Policies: PRINCIPLE MV-LU-1 - The Mountain Vista subarea will have a balance of residential, employment, commercial, civic, and open lands uses. Policies MV-LU-1.2, MV-LU-1.3, MV-LU-1.4 A Town Center has been planned as the heart of the Montava neighborhood and is located near the intersection of Mountain Vista Road and Timberline Road. The Town Center is a smaller center focusing on neighborhood-oriented retail and a mix of public and private uses, centrally located in the MVSP and within walking distance of adjacent neighborhoods. Additional commercial uses could co-locate near this intersection on adjacent undeveloped properties. Main Street in the Town Center is aligned towards the mountain view of Longs Peak. Policies MV-LU-1.5, MV-LU-1.6 The Montava community development transitions along a transect of intensity from high to low across the site with a mix of uses. Towards the Town Center and Mountain Vista Drive, development is generally of a higher intensity, including more mixed-use and multi-family. Outwards from the Town Center, development steps down in intensity towards existing neighborhoods, parks, the farm and natural areas. A small node of higher intensity is located at the top of the hill on Giddings Road, adjacent to the Farm. This node supports the northern neighborhood areas for convenience, while the Town Center supports a much wider area. PRINCIPLE MV-ECON-1 - Mountain Vista’s business center will accommodate the long-term Employment and Industrial land use growth demands of Fort Collins, providing a variety of business and industry types and sizes, compatible with surrounding land uses. Policies MV-ECON-1.1, MV-ECON-1.2 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 96 PUD Design Narrative 32 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n The vision for the Montava development plan began with discussions of long-range planning for A-B and other potential industrial users. In the regional context, rail-served industrial uses are not as viable here as in other Northern Colorado communities. The market for employment uses is delivered differently now than the ‘corporate campus’ setting of the past. Employment uses are integrated into the fabric of the planned community and its amenities. Industrial and larger employment uses are planned south of Mountain Vista Road and the Anheuser-Busch brewery, near the Interstate 25 Interchange. A-B is in support of the Montava PUD Master Plan and planned uses. Given its size as a combined set of undeveloped land parcels, the Montava PUD Master Plan has the ability to support the current land use needs in the northeast part of our city. Concurrent with the updates to City Plan, Fort Collins commissioned the ‘Trends and Forces Report’ which supports the need for more land capacity for the increased housing demand by 2040. This report also confirms that the supply of non-residential land is exceedingly sufficient for the City’s future needs. PRINCIPLE MV-T-1 - Consistent with the Land Use Code, the transportation system within this subarea will have: 1) Arterial corridors providing safe and efficient multi-modal access to and through the subarea, including major features such as railroad under/overpasses (where necessary), and significant landscape mitigation features; 2) Multi-modal connections to and across the arterial corridors, including pedestrian and bicycle connections, providing convenient access to and from the local networks that serve individual developments and buildings; and 3) Integrated local networks with direct, convenient interconnections between developments and surrounding areas. Policies MV-T-1.1, MV-T-1.2, MV-T-1.3, MV-T-1.4, MV-T-1.5 Both regional and local traffic studies have been completed to establish a safe and efficient transportation network to serve the Mountain Vista area for multi-modal access. They include the long-range goals for this area, including the extension of Suniga Drive, and result in changes to the Master Street Plan to improve connectivity in the northeast portion of the City. The studies, findings and reports are included with the PUD Master Plan submittal. PRINCIPLE MV-T-2 - Mountain Vista’s Employment and Community Commercial Districts will both be based on transit-oriented design. Policies MV-T-2.1, MV-T-2.2 The Montava PUD Master Plan is designed to support these principles of transit-oriented design with higher density mixed-use residential in conjunction with retail, office, civic, and other uses to accommodate and support future plans for transit in this area. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 97 PUD Design Narrative 33 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n PRINCIPLE MV-T-3 - The Community Commercial District will be designed with an emphasis on pedestrians. Policies MV-T-3.1, MV-T-3.2 The Montava PUD Master Plan is designed as a true New Urbanist mixed-use, agri-urban community. We have included design standards to support the street network, block and building placement to support this town-like pattern for a successful pedestrian-oriented community. PRINCIPLE MV-T-4 - The City will consider a variety of street design and enforcement methods to ensure realigned Vine Drive does not become a truck route, either intended or unintended. Policies MV-T-4.1, MV-T-4.2 Although these concerns may be outside the control of one development, the planned street network supported by our Master Street Plan amendment replaces the large, angled direct arterial access to Suniga Road with a grid-patterned complete street network which we believe supports the policies of this Section. PRINCIPLE MV-CAD-1 - Important views toward the nearby mountains should be preserved and emphasized by the arrangement and design of development. Policies MV-CAD-1.1, MV-CAD-1.2, MV-CAD-1.3 Montava’s design is derived by intersecting the site’s natural stormwater and topographic features with an overall orientation of streets towards Long’s Peak. Most streets are oriented to capture the view, which is most striking from the hill north on Giddings Road at the farm as well as at the Town Center from the main plaza. Four major stormwater corridors criss-cross the site, defining the edges of neighborhoods and a focal point at the Town Center square along Country Club Road. Each corridor is connected to a series of additional green corridors, providing walking and biking trails throughout the community, connecting to existing regional trails, and providing access to the City Park. The easternmost corridor is substantial in size, driven by off-site stormwater along the Cooper Slough. Working with Natural Areas staff, this corridor is designed as an amenity and pulled into the community’s identity through greenways. PRINCIPLE MV-CAD-2 - Mountain Vista’s community gateway from I-25 should be designed to provide a sense of place and positive experience. Policies MV-CAD-2.1, MV-CAD-2.2 Montava’s design standards and street cross-sections create an enhanced gateway for the Mountain Vista corridor within the context of a walkable community. Land uses transition from Industrial and Employment near I-25 to schools, mixed-use, employment, residential and commercial to the west. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 98 PUD Design Narrative 34 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n PRINCIPLE MV-NOL-1 – This subarea will provide a balanced system of recreation facilities, parks, trails, natural areas, and open lands. Policies MV-NOL-1.1, MV-NOL-1.2, MV-NOL-1.3, MV-NOL-1.4, MV-NOL-1.5, MV-NOL-1.6 By Master-planning over 900 acres within the Mountain Vista Subarea, the design for Montava is able to account for, envision, and implement the NOL Principles of the MVSP. The community park, neighborhood parks, multi-use trails, open lands network, No. 8 ditch and storm drainage facilities have each been included within the Montava PUD Master Plan. Parks and open space areas are integrated into the plan balancing both public and privately owned and maintained open spaces as integral parts of the community and providing connections to planned regional trail, recreation and drainage systems. Climate Action Plan The City is a national leader in the carbon reduction movement. The city tracks emissions annually using 2005 as the baseline year. The community aims to reduce carbon 20% below 2005 levels by 2020, and 80% by 2030 with the goal of being carbon neutral by 2050. This is a complicated equation that incorporates these primary factors. 1. Electric usage and production (51% of carbon inventory) 2. Ground Travel (24% of carbon inventory) 3. Natural Gas (21% of carbon inventory) 4. Solid Waste (4% of carbon inventory) 5. Water Related (<1% of carbon inventory) Electricity Emissions from electricity use are caused by fossil fuel combustion. Most of our electricity is generated by coal and hydropower, with small amount from natural gas, and increasing amounts of renewable wind and solar resources. Montava will engage with this goal and challenges in several ways: 1. Montava has committed to be the largest Zero Energy Ready Home Development in the nation. Applicant is in the process of building the development partnerships, home builders, and systems to make this a reality. Essentially this DOE standard enables the construction of a more insulated, more air tight home that uses less energy. 2. Because it uses less energy, it can become self sufficient with renewable energy using less panels. When battery power is added, and a systematic approach is used to integrate these batteries with the regional utility, then very exciting things can happen. 3. Montava is working with the City very systematically, to create the most energy efficient system that benefits both the home owners and the community with reduced energy usage overall. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 99 PUD Design Narrative 35 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Applicant is working on an optimized energy distribution and management at the home and community level as well. Ground Travel Emissions from transportation, or ground travel, come from the combustion of fuel, primarily gasoline and diesel, within the City’s Growth Management Area (GMA) Montava will engage with this goal and challenges in serval ways: 1. The Zero Energy Ready Home (ZERH) standards include equipping the homes with the ability to connect charging stations for electric vehicles. This will encourage home owners to buy electric vehicles. 2. In addition the Montava development team is working with the City on a systematic structure to further encourage the use of EV’s by integrating them into a connected grid system that can potentially use their batteries in a cooperative fashion that benefits the home owner and community. 3. New Urbanist communities are also built to enable much shorter distances of travel for basic services and enjoyment. Often this encourages home owners to purchase smaller vehicles like golf carts or other EV’s that are smaller than full size cars. Because most, if not all, of your community needs are in a very short distance from your home, these types of alternative vehicles can replace many gas burning vehicle miles. 4. By increasing the home inventory in Fort Collins, we will also dramatically decrease the number of vehicle miles that people are traveling to work in Fort Collins and live outside the city. My own personal drive from Windsor every day will remove over 2,400 pounds of CO2 from the atmosphere simply by moving to Montava from Windsor. Thousands of people work in Fort Collins, but live elsewhere, and drive our roads into the city every day. This is a large contributor to the overall carbon emissions. 5. New Urbanist communities also encourage non vehicle related transportation. Biking and walking are two substantial components and benefits of new urbanist communities. 6. Montava will also manage its waste disposal with one single contractor over the entire community through the Districts. This will reduce truck miles and traffic significantly in the area, and may encourage other developments to do the same. Natural Gas Emissions are produced from the combustion of natural gas, primarily for heat. Montava will engage with this goal and challenges in serval ways: 1. The ZERH standard of construction reduces the need for heating and cooling. The easiest way to reduce carbon emissions is to never have used them in the first place. 2. Montava is working with the City, and its home builder partners, to explore the full electrification of the HVAC Systems in our homes. That would include both air sourced or ground sourced heat exchangers (geothermal units) that use the air or ground for a much more efficient way of heating and cooling our homes. These units add cost to the homes, so it much be looked at in systematic ways to provide an overall benefit to the community and the home buyers. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 100 PUD Design Narrative 36 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n 3. The Montava development team is also exploring ways of electrifying other in home uses that typically utilize natural gas. Induction cook tops can replace gas stoves, electric ovens, electric clothes dryers, and other items can reduce or eliminate natural gas uses. While it is unlikely that Montava will be built as a “gas free” community, there are viable ways this challenge can be addressed and we are exploring them all. Solid Waste Solid waste emissions in the inventory are an estimate of the decomposition of biodegradable waste (e.g. food waste and yard trimmings) in the landfill. Montava will engage with this goal and challenges in serval ways: 1. Because Montava will be managing the waste disposal through the Districts on a community wide level, this provides a point of focus and energy to help educate the community on ways to reduce organic waste. This opportunity to provide public service education is one of the benefits of having a community wide focus and system that can help both the environment and its residents. 2. Montava will also be an agri-urban community developed around farming and connection with the land as part of its DNA. This could provide opportunities to promote composting of organic waste that could be used in the soil restoration and enrichment. 3. Montava intends to be an innovator in this area, in ways that are practical and fit within the context and character of the community overall. Water Related Emissions are produced from the combustion of natural gas, primarily heat. This relates to the treatment, delivery of potable water to the community. Montava will engage with this goal and challenges in serval ways: 1. Montava intends to have every home built to WaterSense standards, which will significantly decrease the amount of water needed and used by all residents of the community. 2. Montava will develop a primarily non potable system for irrigation in the community using well water from on site, reducing potable water treatment and delivery impacts. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 101 PUD Design Narrative 37 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Chapter 11 – Neighborhood Meeting Summaries Public engagement has been a fundamental part of the Montava master planning process. The Developer hosted two neighborhood meetings during the early planning process, as well as a week-long master planning charrette in November 2017. Comments received have been incorporated into the master planning process where feasible. The following are summaries of the comments from the developer-led neighborhood meetings: Pre-Charrette Neighborhood Informational Meeting - October 25, 2017 What will be the size and cost of residential units? Will there be a grey water system? Isn’t this area zoned mainly industrial and commercial? Concerned about infrastructure and cell tower – service is very poor in area. Appreciate the mixed use and would like to see some of the industrial conserved. Will Mountain Vista to and Timberline be widened? Already a problem. $200K to $300K residential for millennials, does that make sense for us Previously someone had developed 300 acres south of the project. Anheuser Busch fought his project. Concerned about truck traffic cutting through his project. Do you have a website? Where are you going to get water? What is your stand on damming the Poudre. Are you working with Poudre School District? Will Unity factory be permanent? Will this change the City’s forecasts of roads? Will it change Timberline? Will the developer pay for roadway improvements? Since you are under contract, how long will you own the land? How long will this project take to complete? How does this meld with the City’s current update to City Plan and the Transportation Plan? A common problem is the projected volumes of traffic, the City has standards that they don’t enforce. Are you coordinating with the proposed development to the north of Richards Lake Road along Turnberry? Concerned about emergency vehicles and fire. How many acres will the farm be and who will run it? Where will it go? With the $200K to $300K price point how will you avoid all the homes being taken by investors and turned into rental properties? One women wants to see the model that is used for evaluating the project include: landfill needs, crime, flora and fauna, night skies, and noise. Sue mentioned working with Gene Meyers to help address affordable housing. Glad that the renewable energy will not include a wind or solar farm. Like the concept with Unity. Concerned about traffic along Timberline and the Railroad tracks. What kind of population will there be in 15 years? ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 102 PUD Design Narrative 38 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Neighborhood meeting regarding the area transportation system - June 5, 2018 What is the schedule? How does the RR play into infrastructure improvements? Country Club traffic has increased significantly when Maple Hill was built. How will Montava mediate anticipated traffic increases Is farmer or developer to the South ok with your planned street network? Timberline to the South needs to be widened its bad today Will Mountain Vista to and Timberline be widened? Already a problem. I-25 semi-trucks go to Country Club to get to 287 - will there be additional signage prohibiting trucks? They use the route to avoid weigh stations Lemay overpass needs to happen Land west of Turnberry is County Will you meet with County? Most of the properties here are in the county - Get City and County to work together. Lemay/Timberline overpass is so needed! If not project will fail! P.S. If not Country Club Rd will have a min. 10 - 15% traffic increase. Can/will Country Club Rd be fixed? Widen Timberline? Can you Provide street connections east of maple Hill? To reduce traffic on Turnberry? Can the RR participate in the roads and overpass? Is Waterglen expanding Turnberry? Concerned about heavy construction traffic on Turnberry for Waterglen I-25 can't handle 6,000 homes being added here Vine connection needs to go to College to accommodate truck by-pass traffic. Cell phone tower issues, it’s a problem here How will this connect to WaterGlen community? Why do you like this Country Club change? If Turnberry extends, whoi will be responsible for the bridge over canal? Will Ditch Co. be involved? City Staff met with our HOA, didn't show Turnberry extension, why are you showing this? Will houses / roads happen in parallel? Are you bringing these drawings to the city? County? In addition, the City of Fort Collins hosted two neighborhood meetings on October 11, 2018 and December 19, 2018. The questions/comments and answers received by city staff for the October 11 meeting are attached as an Appendix. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 103 PUD Design Narrative 39 | P a g e M o n t a v a P U D M a s t e r P l a n Appendix: 1. City of Fort Collins October 11, 2018 Neighborhood Meeting Summary 2. Montava Key Themes – A Visual Overview ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Work Session Packet Pg. 104 Sheet Number: Project Number: Project: Client: 1603 Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 p. (970) 223-7577 www.BHADesign.com Landscape Architecture Urban Design Master Planning L:\PROJECTS\MONTAVA\DWGS\ACAD\PUD\DWG\PUD_EX-COND-PLAN.DWG Plot Date:7/23/2019 5:33 PM Plotted By: Angie Milewski Date Created:9/18/2018 Produced by: Date: Revision & Date: AKM 7/23/2019 1734 HF2M MONTAVA MONTAVA COVER SHEET PUD MASTER PLAN 1. THIS MONTAVA - THE PUD MASTER PLAN CONSISTS OF: THE PUD MASTER PLAN SUMMARY; THE MONTAVA PUD MASTER PLAN PUD DESIGN NARRATIVE; THE MONTAVA - PUD MASTER PLAN SHEETS 1 THROUGH 7, IDENTIFIED IN THE SHEET INDEX; THE MONTAVA PUD MASTER PLAN USES, DENSITIES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE LAND USE CODE, APPENDIX A TO THE MASTER PLAN SUMMARY; AND VARIANCES FROM ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS AND PROPOSED ALTERNATE DESIGNS SUBMITTED WITH SUCH VARIANCES, APPENDIX B TO THE MASTER PLAN SUMMARY. 2. PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. _____, 2019 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, THIS MONTAVA - PUD MASTER PLAN AND THE MONTAVA PUD MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ARE APPROVED AS SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE PURPOSE OF GRANTING VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR THE USES, DENSITIES, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND VARIANCES FROM ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS ALL AS SET FORTH IN THIS MONTAVA - PUD MASTER PLAN AND THE MONTAVA PUD MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR A PERIOD OF TWENTY-FIVE (25) YEARS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE NO. ____, 2019. 3. THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WERE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AS PART OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS FOR THE MONTAVA - PUD MASTER PLAN SUBMITTAL, ARE ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AND INCORPORATED INTO THE MONTAVA RECORD: CONTEXT DIAGRAM MASTER DRAINAGE REPORT PRELIMINARY WATER DEMAND MEMORANDUM MASTER TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION REPORT APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION LETTER REVIEW TYPES COMPARED WITH CURRENT LAND USE CODE STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS AND APPLICANT’S RESPONSES MOUNTAIN VISTA SUBAREA PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST MASTER STREET PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST LETTERS OF INTENT VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS REQUEST THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED TO ASSIST IN THE CITY’S EVALUATION OF MONTAVA – PUD MASTER PLAN AND TO FACILITATE PREPARATION AND EVALUATION OF FUTURE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS WITHIN THE MONTAVA – PUD MASTER PLAN. THEY ARE ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY AND ARE REQUESTED TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE MONTAVA RECORD. NOTHING HEREIN REQUIRES THAT ANY FUTURE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLANS OR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUCH SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION NOR DOES IT PREVENT THE USE OF DESIGNS NOT INCLUDED IN SUCH INFORMATION. RATHER, THE PURPOSE OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS IS TO MEMORIALIZE DISCUSSIONS WHICH HAVE TAKEN PLACE BETWEEN CITY STAFF AND THE DEVELOPER ON THESE MATTERS AS A BASELINE FOR FUTURE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PREPARATION EXISTING TREE WITH ACTIVE RED-TAIL HAWK NEST 50' BUFFER ZONE FROM IRRIGATION DITCH 100' 100' 80' 50' CENTER PIVOT ACCESS ROAD IRRIGATION DITCH 1 IRRIGATION DITCH 2 IRRIGATION DITCH 3 IRRIGATION DITCH 5 IRRIGATION DITCH 4 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 2 WETLAND 3 GRAVEL ROAD EXT. BUILDING, TYP. 50' OVERHEAD POWER ESMT. 100' SANITARY SEWER ESMT. 100' SANITARY SEWER ESMT. EXT. GRAVEL ROAD LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT TEMPORARY 450' LOD RADIUS DURING ACTIVE NESTING SEASON FEB 15 - JUL 15 MOUNTAIN VISTA DRIVE (CR 50) STATE OF COLORADO RICHARDS LAKE ROAD (CR 52) NORTH GIDDINGS ROAD BUSCH DR. I-25 SOUTH BOUND I-25 NORTH BOUND I-25 SOUTH BOUND I-25 NORTH BOUND BUSCH DR. ANHEUSER BUSCH LLC L&W CANAL STORYBROOK SUBDIVISION MAPLE HILL SUBDIVISION WATERGLEN SUBDIVISION TURNBERRY ROAD (CR 11) LIND SUBDIVISION FORT COLLINS FARM LLC. ANHEUSER BUSCH LLC. POUDRE R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT K AND M CO. COUNTRY CLUB ROAD RICHARDS LAKE ROAD (CR 52) MOUNTAIN VISTA DRIVE (CR 50) NORTH GIDDINGS ROAD EXISTING OIL WELL, CAPPED AND ABANDONED ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3 Work Session Packet Pg. 107 Sheet Number: Project Number: Project: Client: /USERS/MATT/ELC/SHARED/PROJECTS-2015_2019/1725-MONTAVA/1725-02-FILES/1725-MASTERPLAN/01-RESOURCE/TITLE_BLOCK/PUD_SUBMITTAL/24X36_TITLE_BLOCK_PUD_CONSULTANT.DWG Plot Date:9/13/2018 10:34 AM Plotted By: Matthew Lambert Date Created:9/13/2018 Produced by: Date: Revision & Date: X.X. X.X.XXX 1734 HF2M MONTAVA MONTAVA OVERALL UTILITY PLAN PUD MASTER PLAN 07/22/19 DPZ CODESIGN CITY OF FORT COLLINS PARK PSD HIGH SCHOOL PSD MIDDLE SCHOOL PSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ANNOTATED MASTER PLAN MOUNTAIN VISTA DR N TIMBERLINE RD RICHARDS LAKE RD N GIDDINGS RD TURNBERRY RD Civic Program 1 Library 2 Civic Building Reserve 3 Fire Station 4 Elementary School 5 Middle School 6 High School Civic Space Program 7 Park - City of Fort Collins Park 8 Plaza - With Active Programming 9 Square - Passive 10 Square - With Active Programming and Stormwater Area 11 Green - Passive 12 Green - With Active Programming 13 Green - With Passive Recreation / Stormwater Area 14 Compact Green - Passive 15 Linear Greenway - Passive 16 Linear Greenway - With Stormwater Conveyance 17 Natural Areas & Stormwater Management Miscellaneous 18 Red-tailed Hawk Nest 19 Gas Well Civic Space Program Activities Formal Gatherings, Performances: 8, 12 Community Gardens: 7, 10, 11, 13, 14 Playgrounds: 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 Sheet Number: Project Number: Project: Client: /USERS/MATT/ELC/SHARED/PROJECTS-2015_2019/1725-MONTAVA/1725-02-FILES/1725-MASTERPLAN/01-RESOURCE/TITLE_BLOCK/PUD_SUBMITTAL/24X36_TITLE_BLOCK_PUD_CONSULTANT.DWG Plot Date:9/13/2018 10:34 AM Plotted By: Matthew Lambert Date Created:9/13/2018 Produced by: Date: Revision & Date: X.X. X.X.XXX 1734 HF2M MONTAVA MONTAVA OVERALL UTILITY PLAN PUD MASTER PLAN 07/22/19 DPZ CODESIGN CITY OF FORT COLLINS PARK PSD HIGH SCHOOL PSD MIDDLE SCHOOL PSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PUD DISTRICTS - ILLUSTRATIVE MOUNTAIN VISTA DR N TIMBERLINE RD RICHARDS LAKE RD N GIDDINGS RD INTERSTATE 25 TURNBERRY RD 0’ 200’ 400’ 600’ 800’ 1,600’ T5 Urban Center / Mixed-use T4 General Urban Neighborhood T3.2 Sub-urban Neighborhood T3.1 Rural Neighborhood T2 Rural / Farm City Park & Open Space Poudre School District Natural Areas & Stormwater Industrial & Employment N TIMBERLINE RD N NNNNNN GG GGGGGGIIIIIDDDDDDDDDDIIIIINNNNNGGGGGSSSSSSSS GID DINGS GG RRRRRRRDDDDD T4 Ge T3.2 S T3.1 R T2 Ru City P Poud Natur Indus PSD HIGH SCHOOL PSD MIDDLE SCHOOL PSD EL SCHOOL MOUNTAIN MOUNTTAA INNVISTAD VISSTTTAA VISTA DR CITY OF FORT COLLINS LLIINNSSPARK PPAARRRKKK L - M - N - LOW -DENSITY MIXED USE Sheet Number: Project Number: Project: Client: /USERS/MATT/ELC/SHARED/PROJECTS-2015_2019/1725-MONTAVA/1725-02-FILES/1725-MASTERPLAN/01-RESOURCE/TITLE_BLOCK/PUD_SUBMITTAL/24X36_TITLE_BLOCK_PUD_CONSULTANT.DWG Plot Date:9/13/2018 10:34 AM Plotted By: Matthew Lambert Date Created:9/13/2018 Produced by: Date: Revision & Date: X.X. X.X.XXX 1734 HF2M MONTAVA MONTAVA OVERALL UTILITY PLAN PUD MASTER PLAN 07/24/19 DPZ CODESIGN CITY OF FORT COLLINS PARK PSD PSD PSD PUD DISTRICTS MOUNTAIN VISTA DR N TIMBERLINE RD RICHARDS LAKE RD N GIDDINGS RD INTERSTATE 25 TURNBERRY RD 0’ 200’ 400’ 600’ 800’ 1,600’ (T5) Urban Center / Mixed-use (T4) General Urban Neighborhood (T3.2) Sub-urban Neighborhood (T3.1) Rural Neighborhood (T2) Rural / Farm City of Fort Collins Park (PSD) Poudre School District (S) Natural Areas & Stormwater (I) Industrial & Employment T2 T5 T4 T4 T4 T5 T3.2 T3.1 T3.1 T3.2 T4 T4 T4 T4 T4 T5 T5 T5 T5 T5 T4 T3.2 T3.2 Sheet Number: Project Number: Project: Client: /USERS/MATT/ELC/SHARED/PROJECTS-2015_2019/1725-MONTAVA/1725-02-FILES/1725-MASTERPLAN/01-RESOURCE/TITLE_BLOCK/PUD_SUBMITTAL/24X36_TITLE_BLOCK_PUD_CONSULTANT.DWG Plot Date:9/13/2018 10:34 AM Plotted By: Matthew Lambert Date Created:9/13/2018 Produced by: Date: Revision & Date: X.X. X.X.XXX 1734 HF2M MONTAVA MONTAVA OVERALL UTILITY PLAN PUD MASTER PLAN 07/22/19 DPZ CODESIGN CITY OF FORT COLLINS PARK PSD HIGH SCHOOL PSD MIDDLE SCHOOL PSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PHASE 1A PHASE 1B PHASE 2A PHASE 2B PHASE 3B PHASE 1B PHASE 3A PHASE 4A PHASE 3B PHASE 4B PHASE 5B PHASE 5A PHASE 6 PHASE 1B PHASE 3 - 6 DEVELOPMENT PHASING PLAN CITY OF FORT COLLINS PARK PSD HIGH SCHOOL PSD MIDDLE SCHOOL PSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PHASE 1A PHASE 1B PHASE 2A PHASE 2B PHASE 3B PHASE 1B PHASE 3A PHASE 4A PHASE 3B PHASE 4B PHASE 5B PHASE 5A PHASE 6 PHASE 1B PHASE 3 - 6 14 7 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3 PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities, and Development Standards JULY 23, 2019 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 112 [PAGE IIIINNNNTTTTEEEENNNNTTTTIIIIOOOONNNNAAAALLLLLLLLYYYY BLANK] ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 113 1. Community VVVViiiissssiiiioooonnnn ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 6666 1.1. Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Use ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 7777 2.1. Description of Transect Districts and Special Districts ............................................................................ 7 2.2. Permitted Uses ........................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3. Use Restrictions ....................................................................................................................................... 12 2.4. Land uses by Transect Districts and Special Districts ............................................................................ 12 3. Density ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 29 3.1. Request for Modified Densities ............................................................................................................... 29 3.2. Description of Modified Densities .......................................................................................................... 29 3.3. Density by Phase ..................................................................................................................................... 29 3.4. Justification for Density Modifications .................................................................................................. 32 4. Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss OOOOvvvveeeerrrrvvvviiiieeeewwww ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. .............. 33 4.1. Request for Modified Development Standards ...................................................................................... 33 4.2. Description of Modified Development Standards .................................................................................. 33 4.3. Compliance with Criteria of LUC 4.29(G)(3) ......................................................................................... 33 5. Lots aaaannnndddd BBBBuuuuiiiillllddddiiiinnnnggggssss ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 35 5.1. Overview.................................................................................................................................................. 35 5.2. Summary of Standards ............................................................................................................................. 35 5.3. Lot Size ..................................................................................................................................................... 40 5.4. Lot Occupation And Coverage ................................................................................................................ 40 5.5. Setbacks .................................................................................................................................................... 41 5.6. Height ...................................................................................................................................................... 43 5.7. Building Orientation ............................................................................................................................... 45 5.8. Frontage ................................................................................................................................................... 46 5.9. Shopfronts ................................................................................................................................................ 54 5.10. Fencing and Walls ................................................................................................................................... 55 5.11. Accessory Dwelling Units ....................................................................................................................... 57 5.12. Exterior Lighting ..................................................................................................................................... 57 6. Parrrrkkkkiiiinnnngggg Pa ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 62 62 6.1. Overview.................................................................................................................................................. 62 6.2. Vehicular Parking Location And Access: T3.1 ....................................................................................... 62 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 114 6.3. Vehicular Parking Location and Access: T3.2 and T4 ........................................................................... 64 6.4. Vehicular Parking Location and Access: T5 ........................................................................................... 64 6.5. Required Vehicular Parking ................................................................................................................... 66 6.6. Required Vehicular Parking Adjustments.............................................................................................. 67 6.7. Vehicular Parking Lot Design ................................................................................................................. 69 6.8. Vehicular Parking Lot Landscaping ....................................................................................................... 70 6.9. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: T5 ............................................................................................... 70 6.10. Required Bicycle Parking ........................................................................................................................ 70 6.11. Justification for Modifications of Parking Standards ............................................................................. 71 7. Private LLLLooootttt LLLLaaaannnnddddssssccccaaaappppiiiinnnngggg ................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. .............................. 72 7.1. Overview.................................................................................................................................................. 72 7.2. Modifications to Land Use Code Standards ............................................................................................ 72 7.3. landscape materials .................................................................................................................................. 72 7.4. Justification for Private Lot Landscaping Standards .............................................................................. 72 8. Signage ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 74 8.1. Overview.................................................................................................................................................. 74 8.2. Transect District Correlation .................................................................................................................. 74 8.3. Modifications to Land Use Code Standards ............................................................................................ 74 8.4. justification for signage standards ........................................................................................................... 74 9. Architectural CCCChhhhaaaarrrraaaacccctttteeeerrrr ................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 75 75 9.1. Overview.................................................................................................................................................. 75 9.2. Building Materials ................................................................................................................................... 75 9.3. Openings .................................................................................................................................................. 75 9.4. Foundations ............................................................................................................................................. 75 9.5. Solar Orientation ..................................................................................................................................... 75 9.6. Mechanical Equipment and Refuse Storage ........................................................................................... 75 9.7. Outbuildings ............................................................................................................................................ 76 9.8. Justification for Architectural Character Standards............................................................................... 76 10. Civic SSSSppppaaaacccceeee ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 77 10.1. Overview.................................................................................................................................................. 77 10.2. Civic Space Types .................................................................................................................................... 77 10.3. Justfication for Civic Space standards ..................................................................................................... 82 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 115 11. Buffering ffffoooorrrr rrrreeeessssiiiiddddeeeennnnttttiiiiaaaallll aaaannnndddd hhhhiiiigggghhhh ooooccccccccuuuuppppaaaannnnccccyyyy bbbbuuuuiiiillllddddiiiinnnngggg uuuunnnniiiittttssss ................................ ................................ ....... ....... 84 11.1. Overview.................................................................................................................................................. 84 11.2. Modifications to Land Use Code Standards ............................................................................................ 84 11.3. Justification for Buffering for Residential and High Occupancy Building Units ................................. 85 12. MODIFICATIONS TTTTOOOO SSSSUUUUPPPPPPPPLLLLEEEEMMMMEEEENNNNTTTTAAAALLLL RRRREEEEGGGGUUUULLLLAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNNSSSS ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 87 12.1. Overview.................................................................................................................................................. 87 12.2. Justification for modifications ................................................................................................................. 88 13. Definitions ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 91 13.1. Request for modified definitions ............................................................................................................ 91 13.2. Justfication for Definitions ...................................................................................................................... 93 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 116 Monttttaaaavvvvaaaa Mon Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development Standards Standards CH 1:TTTTrrrraaaannnnsssseeeecccctttt aaaannnndddd SSSSppppeeeecccciiiiaaaallll DDDDiiiissssttttrrrriiiiccccttttssss 6666 of 99994444 1. COMMUNITY VVVVIIIISSSSIIIIOOOONNNN 1.1. SUMMARY Montava is a significant traditional neighborhood development infused with agrarian elements, expressing the site’s past and surrounding context. Given its size, Montava is comprised of a series of connected neighborhoods, each unique in layout, character, intensity, and surroundings. All neighborhoods are compact and walkable, with some of a higher intensity and others lower in intensity. The site’s topography and open spaces permeate Montava, pulling natural areas and recreational spaces into the heart of the community. Montava’s design relies upon coordination between the PUD Master Plan and the Uses, Densities, and Development Standards to achieve community goals. Together, they craft design of the project which, in turn, creates a large, diverse, walkable, mixed-use community and an interconnected series of neighborhoods, centers, and open spaces. These Montava PUD Master Plan, Uses, Densities, and Development Standards embody flexibility in site design and are intended to achieve the Montava community vision and to support and further the principles and policies of City Plan. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 117 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 7777 of 99994444 2. UUUUSE SE 2.1. DESCRIPTION OF TRANSECT DISTRICTS AAAANNNNDDDD SPECIAL DISTRICTS 2.1.1. A transect of nature is a geographical cross- section of a region that reveals the sequence of environments. It examines the many symbiotic elements that contribute to habitats where certain plants and animals thrive. The transect was first used for biogeographical analysis by naturalist Alexander von Humboldt in the late 18th Century. In the late 20th century, Andres Duany, working with New Urbanist colleagues, identified the rural-to-urban transect of the built environment, ranging across densities from unbuilt preserve land to the dense urban core. Human beings thrive in a variety of habitats: some would never choose to live in the urban core and others would wither in a rural place. To provide meaningful choices in living arrangements, the full rural-to-urban transect is divided into six transect districts, designed for use in zoning ordinances. These six habitats vary by the ratio and level of intensity of their natural, built, and social components. The transect districts are coordinated to all scales of planning, from the region, through the community and neighborhood, to the individual lot and building. Montava uses five of the six transect districts, excluding the most intensive district, which applies to the most intensive regional places, like downtown Denver. Districts that are not part of the transect system are considered special districts. Special districts are areas of single use or special circumstances. The Industrial and Employment District, for instance, is a special use area that is not a neighborhood-based component of the City. The platform of the transect allows the integration of the design protocols of traffic engineering, public works, town planning, architecture, landscape architecture and ecology. This is the foundation of form-based planning, design, and coding. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 118 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 8888 of 99994444 The boundaries of the Transect and Special Districts of the Montava PUD Master Plan which are depicted in Figure 1 below and on Sheet 6 of the Montava PUD Master Plan and are incorporated herein by reference. The Transect and Special Districts are described below in Sections 2.1.2 through 2.1.6. Figure 1- Transect District Map ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 119 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 9999 of 99994444 2.1.2. Transect Districts a. Development is regulated according to the intensity of use permitted on each parcel, according to the following five (5) districts: i. Transect District T5 – Urban Center/Mixed Use: A high intensity mixed-use district, consisting of residential, commercial, and institutional uses. ii. Transect District T4 – General Urban Neighborhood: A medium-high intensity residential district, consisting of single family and multi-family housing, attached and detached, and home occupations. iii. Transect District T3.2 – Sub-Urban Neighborhood: A medium-low intensity residential district, consisting of single family detached housing. iv. Transect District T3.1 – Rural Neighborhood: A low intensity residential district, consisting of single family detached housing situated on larger lots. v. Transect District T2 – Rural/Farm: A rural, agricultural district, consisting of small to large farms and support facilities including housing, processing, storage, sales, and distribution. 2.1.3. (I) - Industrial and Employment Special District a. The Industrial and Employment Special District is intended for a combination of industrial, and employment uses. b. Uses in the Industrial and Employment Special District are as set forth in this Chapter. 2.1.4. (S) - Natural Areas and Stormwater Special District a. A portion of Montava is dedicated to regional and site-serving stormwater management (S), in coordination with Natural Areas as a natural resource corridor. 2.1.5. Poudre School (PSD) Special District a. Poudre School District property (PSD) within Montava is not regulated by these development standards. 2.1.6. (P) - Community Park Special District a. City of Fort Collins Park property (P) within Montava is not regulated by these development standards. 2.2. PERMITTED USES 2.2.1. LUC Section 4.29 (E)(2) allows uses not permitted in an underlying zone district to be added to a PUD Master Plan provided such additional uses are enumerated with a proposed type of review and such uses satisfy the criteria of LUC Section 4.29(E)(2)(a) through (d). 2.2.2. The following uses and types of review are permitted in Montava and modify the uses permitted in the underlying zone districts: Division 4.5 - Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood District (L-M-N), Division 4.27 - Employment District (E) and Division 4.28 - Industrial District (I). ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 120 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 10 ooooffff 99994444 2.2.3. Amendments to the uses and types of review in Montava shall be in accordance with LUC Section 4.29(I)(2) and Sections 2.2.10(A) and (B). 2.2.4. The following table is a summary of the permitted uses within the transects of Montava 2.2.5. Uses are permitted by transect district, according to Table 2.1-1. 2.2.6. Multiple uses per lot and per building are permitted. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 2.2222--1.PPPPEEEERRRRMMMMIIIITTTTTTTTEEEEDDDD UUUUSSSSEEEESSSS USE SUBCATEGORY T2 T3.1 T3.2 T4 T5 S Residential Single-family Detached (All) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Single-family Attached (All) ✓ ✓ ✓ Two-family Dwellings (All) ✓ ✓ ✓ Accessory Dwellings ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Mixed-use Dwellings (All) ✓ ✓ Extra Occupancy Rental House (All) ✓ ✓ Group Home (All) ✓ ✓ Multi-family up to 14 units per building ✓ ✓ ✓ Multi-family over 14 units per building ✓ ✓ Long-term Care Facilities ✓ ✓ Commercial All Commercial/Retail Uses over 2,000 sf ✓ All Commercial/Retail Uses under 2,000 sf ✓ ✓ Food Membership Distribution Site ✓ ✓ ✓ Food Catering or Small Food Product Production ✓ ✓ ✓ Lodging Short-term Rental (Primary) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Bed & Breakfast up to 6 rooms ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Lodging Establishment up to 12 rooms ✓ ✓ ✓ Lodging Establishment over 12 rooms ✓ Manufacturing Workshop and Custom Small Industry ✓ Light Industrial ✓ Solar Energy Systems, small & medium ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Solar Energy Systems, large scale ✓ ✓ ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 121 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 11 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 2.2222--1.PPPPEEEERRRRMMMMIIIITTTTTTTTEEEEDDDD UUUUSSSSEEEESSSS USE SUBCATEGORY T2 T3.1 T3.2 T4 T5 S Public, Institutional All Educational Uses ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Public Use ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Minor Public Facilities ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Major Public Facilities ✓ Neighborhood Support / Recreation Facilities ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Places of worship or assembly ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Community Facilities ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Parks and Recreation (All), Outdoor Amphitheaters ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Open Lands ✓ ✓ Agricultural Plant Nurseries and Greenhouses ✓ ✓ Composting Facilities ✓ Farm Animals ✓ Agricultural Activities ✓ Value Added Agriculture ✓ Veterinary facilities, hospital ✓ Animal Boarding ✓ Open air farmers market ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Urban Agriculture ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Misc. Off-site construction staging ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Parking garages, lots, and structures ✓ Outdoor Vendor ✓ ✓ ✓ Accessory Uses ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Accessory Buildings ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 122 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 12 ooooffff 99994444 2.3. USE RESTRICTIONS 2.3.1. Accessory DDDDwwwweeeelllllllliiiinnnnggggssss a. Accessory dwellings are subject to the standards of Section 5.9. 2.3.2. Adult OOOOrrrriiiieeeennnntttteeeedddd UUUUsssseeeessss a. Adult oriented uses are not permitted. 2.3.3. Automobile SSSSaaaalllleeeessss a. Automobile sales are permitted within storefront showrooms under 10,000 sf b. Parking lots related to a storefront showroom must be located behind the showroom building relative to front lot lines. 2.3.4. Automobile SSSSeeeerrrrvvvviiiicccceeee a. Service areas and vehicle storage and stacking must be located behind the main building relative to front and side street lot lines. 2.3.5. Equipment, TTTTrrrruuuucccckkkk aaaannnndddd TTTTrrrraaaaiiiilllleeeerrrr RRRRental ental EEEEssssttttaaaabbbblllliiiisssshhhhmmmmeeeennnnttttssss a. Equipment, truck and trailer rental establishments are not permitted. 2.3.6. Extra OOOOccccccccuuuuppppaaaannnnccccyyyy RRRReeeennnnttttaaaallll HHHHoooouuuusssseeeessss a. Occupancy is limited to 2 people per bedroom plus 1 additional person. 2.3.7. Driiiivvvveeee-Dr -Thrus a. Drive-thrus may not be located between the primary building and front or side street lot lines. b. Banks providing a drive-thru must also provide a minimum of one pedestrian-oriented automatic teller accessible from a front or side street lot line. c. Vehicle stacking must be accommodated on site or in shared parking areas. 2.3.8. Retail aaaannnndddd SSSSuuuuppppppppllllyyyy YYYYaaaarrrrdddd E EEEssssttttaaaabbbblllliiiisssshhhhmmmmeeeennnnttttssss wwwwiiiitttthhhh OOOOuuuuttttddddoooooooorrrr SSSSttttoooorrrraaaaggggeeee a. Retail and supply yard establishments with outdoor storage uses are not permitted. 2.3.9. Sales aaaannnndddd LLLLeeeeaaaassssiiiinnnngggg ooooffff MMMMoooobbbbiiiilllleeee Homes, Homes, FFFFaaaarrrrmmmm Implements,HHHHeeeeaaaavvvvyyyy EEEExxxxccccaaaavvvvaaaattttiiiioooonnnn EEEqqquuuiiipppmmmeeennnttt Equipment a. Commercial uses that include sales and leasing of mobile homes, farm implements, or heavy excavation equipment are not permitted 2.3.10. Temporary SSSSttttrrrruuuuccccttttuuuurrrreeeessss a. No structure of a temporary character, bus, motor home, camper, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, or other outbuilding may be used on any lot at any time as a residence, either temporarily or permanently. 2.3.11. VVVVeeeehhhhiiiicccclllleeee aaaannnndddd BBBBooooaaaatttt SSSSaaaalllleeeessss aaaannnndddd LLLLeeeeaaaassssiiiinnnngggg EEEEssssttttaaaabbbblllliiiisssshhhhmmmmeeeennnntttt wwwwiiiitttthhhh OOOOuuuuttttddddoooooooorrrr SSSSttttoooorrrraaaaggggeeee a. Vehicle and boat sales and leasing establishments with outdoor storage are not permitted. 2.3.12. VVVVeeeehhhhiiiicccclllleeee MMMMaaaajjjjoooorrrr Repair,SSSSeeeerrrrvvvviiiicccciiiinnnngggg aaaannnndddd Maintenance Maintenance EEEEssssttttaaaabbbblllliiiisssshhhhmmmmeeeennnnttttssss a. Vehicle major repair, servicing and maintenance establishments are not permitted. 2.4. LAND USES BBBBYYYY TRANSECT DISTRICTS AAAANNNNDDDD SSSSPPPPEEEECCCCIIIIAAAALLLL DISTRICTS The following tables list the permitted land uses for each transect district and special district within the PUD Master Plan, as well as the review type for each use. Land uses listed in the PUD Master Plan are those which are anticipated at this point in time and others which may be appropriate as the PUD Master Plan develops over time. In addition, but not listed specifically, we anticipate a new PFA fire station will be located within the PUD Master Plan. Since the final location has not been determined, we have added ‘Public Use’ as an ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 123 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 13 ooooffff 99994444 allowed use throughout the PUD Master Plan to support police or fire station uses in Montava. 2.4.1. Transect District T2 Rural/Farm a. There is one (1) Land Use Code zone district (I) underlying Transect District T2. The following uses and types of review are permitted in Transect District T2; such uses and types of review modify the types of review and uses permitted in the underlying zone district. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 124 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 14 ooooffff 99994444 Transect District T2 Rural / Farm Uses Type of Review Single-family Detached Type II Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Type I Food membership distribution site BDR Food catering or small food product preparation BDR Neighborhood Support/rec facilities (general assembly) Type I Bed and breakfast up to 6 rooms Type II Lodging establishment (Inn up to 12 rooms) Type II Solar Energy Systems, small and medium Type I Public Use BDR Minor Public Facilities Type I Places of Worship or assembly Type II Community Facilities Type I Parks and Recreation Type I Open Lands BDR Plant Nurseries and Greenhouses Type I Composting Facilities Type I Farm Animals Type I Agricultural Activities Type I Value Added Agriculture Type I Animal Boarding Type I Open-air farmers market BDR Veterinary facilities, hospital Type I Urban Agriculture BDR Off-site construction staging BDR Outdoor Vendor BDR Accessory Uses BDR Accessory buildings BDR ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 125 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 15 ooooffff 99994444 b. The Rural / Farm uses proposed for Transect District T2 are not contrary to the public good and satisfy the criteria of Land Use Code Section 4.29(E)(2): i. The uses advance the purpose and objectives of the applicable PUD Overlay provisions set forth in LUC Sections 4.29 (A) and (B) and the principles and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans and policies. See Subsections 2.2.A and 2.2.B and Chapter 10 of the Design Narrative. In addition, T2 is a key component of land use diversification, providing for an innovative Montava community design with the interaction of residential and mixed-use areas with the land’s agricultural heritage. Integrating the transect’s agrarian character into Montava is an innovative design component supporting the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan’s goals. Apart from large scale farming, T2 is intended to connect the community to local, productive, and organic agriculture. ii. The Rural / Farm uses comply with applicable LUC provisions regarding the natural environment, including but not limited to water, air, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the natural functioning of the environment and must continue to comply with each preliminary development plan submitted pursuant to the PUD Master Plan. Transect District T2 continues the existing agricultural use of the property. The location of T2 represents the best agricultural soils on the property, which are currently in agricultural use and will continue in agricultural use. Adjacent to this low intensity transect district are large areas for storm water management and wildlife in a Natural Areas corridor. The Rural Farm uses will comply with all applicable LUC standards, except as modified in this PUD Master Plan iii. The Rural / Farm uses are compatible with the other uses proposed for Montava and with the uses permitted in the zone district or districts adjacent to T2. Transect District T2 establishes long-term agricultural use of a portion of Montava. This reflects the existing use of the property and other adjacent properties to the north which are outside of the Montava PUD Master Plan. It is also central to the goals of the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. The agrarian urbanism theme of Montava is knitted together by the Farm and distributed community gardening and agriculture, which relates these uses to other areas within Montava. iv. The Rural / Farm uses are appropriate for this transect district within the PUD Master Plan. Transect District T2 continues existing agricultural uses of the property and integrates agrarian urbanism themes into Montava as contemplated in the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. 2.4.2. Transect District T3.1 Rural Neighborhood a. There are two (2) Land Use Code zone districts (E and I) underlying Transect District T3.1. The following uses and types of review are permitted in Transect District T3.1; such uses and types of review modify the types of review and uses in the underlying zone districts. Transect District T3.1 Rural Neighborhood Uses Type of Review Single-family detached Type I ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 126 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 16 ooooffff 99994444 Accessory Dwelling Units Type I Short Term Rentals (Primary) BDR Solar Energy Systems, small and medium Type I Public and private schools-all levels Type II Public Use BDR Minor Public Facilities Type I Neighborhood Support / Recreation Facilities Type I Places of Worship or assembly Type II Community Facilities Type I Parks and Recreation Type I Open-air farmers market BDR Urban Agriculture BDR Off-site construction staging BDR Accessory uses BDR Accessory buildings BDR b. The Rural Neighborhood uses proposed for Transect District T3.1 are not contrary to the public good and satisfy the criteria of Land Use Code Section 4.29(E)(2): i. The uses advance the purpose and objectives of the applicable PUD Overlay provisions set forth in Sections 4.29 (A) and (B) and the principles and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans and policies. See Subsections 2.2.A and 2.2.B and Chapter 10 of the Design Narrative. In addition, T3.1 is used sparingly in Montava, as a means of transitioning from higher intensity transect districts to natural area and adjacent, lower intensity residential areas like Maple Hill. T3.1 assists in diversifying development, being a relative larger lot, single-family housing district, while the remainder of the site represents more internal mixing of intensities and uses. Its allocation towards the southeast and northwest edges of Montava demonstrates how mixed-use and mixed-intensity neighborhoods can transition in scale and intensity towards natural areas and low intensity uses like agriculture. T3.1 provides a character of building type and setback that introduces more space for natural landscaping. In addition, lighting standards designed for this district reinforce the dark sky environment of the natural areas; it is a key piece in light and intensity transition from active urban areas to nature. Compared with other districts, houses in T3.1 are more easily supported by residential PV systems and can orient rooms for solar gain. While not a particularly efficient land use alone, T3.1 transitions intensity from very efficient uses elsewhere into natural area that may be negatively impacted by too much human intensity. T3.1 provides significant opportunities for accessory dwelling units, which increases its land use efficiency. Due to the district’s scale and limited use, amenities within ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 127 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 17 ooooffff 99994444 this district are primarily trails adjacent to natural areas; the adjacent T3.2 and T4 districts provide additional amenities along with greater development intensity. ii. The uses comply with applicable LUC provisions regarding the natural environment, including but not limited to water, air, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the natural functioning of the environment and must continue to comply with each preliminary development plan submitted pursuant to the PUD Master Plan. Transect T3.1 is low impact in nature and dark sky friendly lighting (LZ1) transitions well to natural areas, provides for more vegetative area, and connects Montava with nature in a gradual way. The larger lots provide for more on-site storm water mitigation through larger areas of pervious surface. An exclusively residential district, T3.1 buffers natural areas from more intensive noise and light of Transect Districts T4 and T5. Storm water management itself is a key design component of Montava, where natural topographic features define the location and functioning of constructed storm water systems. Storm water is managed through vegetated channels and distributed open spaces where it is cleaned and conveyed to regional systems. Some component of the storm water system passes through each of the transect districts. In T3.1, the storm water system is designed in a naturalistic manner and connects directly to systems in the natural areas. iii. The uses are compatible with the other uses proposed for Montava and with the uses permitted in the zone district or districts adjacent to this transect district. Within the developed portions of Montava, the transect concept is used to ensure compatibility between uses across the site by incrementally transitioning intensity of use from lower intensity districts, T2 and T3.1, through the medium intensity district of T3.2, to the higher intensity districts of T4 and T5. The transect directs changes in use intensity, changes in building intensity, changes in intensity of impervious surfaces and landscaping, changes in hardness/softness of materials, and changes in lighting, all components of compatibility. Transect District T3.1 is used sparingly in Montava, as a means of transitioning from higher intensity districts to natural areas and adjacent, lower intensity residential areas like Maple Hill. Its use is similar to Transect District T3.2, which is typically the adjacent district, but at a slightly lower intensity. iv. The uses are appropriate for this district within the PUD Master Plan. Transect District T3.1 is a component of development intensity envisioned in the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. It is appropriate for use in limited quantities, as applied through the Montava design. Rural Neighborhood uses transition intensity to aid in compatibility with neighboring properties and natural areas. 2.4.3. Transect District T3.2 Sub-Urban Neighborhood a. There are three (3) Land Use Code zone districts (LMN, E and I) underlying Transect District T3.2. The following uses and types of review are permitted in Transect District T3.2; such uses and types of review shall modify the types of review and uses in the underlying zone districts. Transect District T3.2 Sub-Sub -Urban Neighborhood Uses Type of Review Single-family detached BDR ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 128 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 18 ooooffff 99994444 Single-family attached BDR Two-family dwellings BDR Accessory Dwelling Units Type I Multi-family up to 14 units/bldg. Type I Short Term Rentals (Primary) BDR Bed and breakfast up to 6 rooms Type I Solar Energy Systems, small and medium Type I Public and private schools-all levels Type I Public Use BDR Minor Public Facilities Type I Neighborhood Support / Recreation Facilities Type I Places of worship or assembly (religious assembly) Type I Community Facilities Type I Parks and Recreation Type I Open-air farmers market BDR Urban Agriculture BDR Off-site construction staging BDR Accessory uses BDR Accessory buildings BDR b. The Sub-Urban uses proposed for Transect District T3.2 are not contrary to the public good and satisfy the criteria of Land Use Code Section 4.29(E)(2): i. The uses advance the purpose and objectives of the applicable PUD Overlay provisions set forth in Sections 4.29 (A) and (B) and the principles and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans and policies. See Subsections 2.2.A and 2.2.B and Chapter 10 of the Design Narrative. In addition, Transect District T3.2 is a key component of the mixed-use, mixed-intensity neighborhood structure of Montava. While not mixed-use, T3.2 provides for a mix in intensity, transitioning from lower intensity T3.1 areas to mixed-use, mixed- intensity T4 and T5. Transect District T3.2 is an area of diverse residential uses including single family, duplex, small multi-family, and limited non-residential components. Its allocation towards the southeast and northwest edges of Montava demonstrates how mixed-use and mixed-intensity neighborhoods can transition in scale and intensity towards lower intensity residential development and natural areas. Transect District T3.2 provides open space in the form of greens, pocket parks, playgrounds, and linear open spaces with trails. Open space is distributed through residential areas, providing for direct or near direct access to amenities for most district residents. Community gardens are a key component of the district, whether in formal open spaces or informally located in alley areas and pedestrian ways, as ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 129 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 19 ooooffff 99994444 contemplated by the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. Transect District T3.2 is a more efficient use of land than T3.1, also a key component in the transect concept innovation of development intensity transitioning. Like T3.1, housing in T3.2 can easily provide roof area for residential PV systems and orientation of rooms for solar gain. Also similar to T3.1, T3.2 provides significant opportunities for accessory dwelling units, increasing land use efficiency. ii. The uses comply with applicable LUC provisions regarding the natural environment, including but not limited to water, air, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the natural functioning of the environment and must continue to comply with each preliminary development plan submitted pursuant to the PUD Master Plan. Transect District T3.2 has moderate impact, and dark sky friendly lighting (LZ1) transitions well down to T3.1 areas and natural areas, and up to T4 and T5 areas. Its application buffers natural areas and systems from higher intensity development in Transect Districts T4 and T5. The medium sized lots provide for some on-site storm water mitigation through areas of pervious surface. Additional management is provided through multi-use civic greens and linear parks. Storm water management itself is a key design component of Montava, where natural topographic features define the location and functioning of constructed storm water systems. Storm water is managed through vegetated channels and distributed open spaces where it is cleaned and conveyed to regional systems. Some component of the storm water system passes through each of the transects and districts. In T3.2, the storm water system design accounts for adjacent development while transitioning to a more naturalistic design in T3.1 and natural areas. iii. The uses are compatible with the other uses proposed for Montava and with the uses permitted in the zone district or districts adjacent to this transect district. Within the developed portions of Montava, the transect concept is used to ensure compatibility between uses across the site by incrementally transitioning intensity of use from lower intensity districts, T2 and T3.1, through the medium intensity district, T3.2, to the higher intensity districts, T4 and T5. This transect directs changes in use intensity, changes in building intensity, changes in intensity of impervious surfaces and landscaping, changes in hardness/softness of materials, and changes in lighting, all components of compatibility. Transect District T3.2 is moderate in intensity, similar to that of adjacent developments in Maple Hill, Lind, and Waterglen. T3.2 provides for a mix of housing types and conditions, while signaling the end of higher-intensity development at Montava’s Town Center and core neighborhoods. Its uses are limited, but in greater quantity than T3.1, transitioning towards the lower intensity northwest and southeastern edges. iv. The uses are appropriate for this transect district within the PUD PUD Master Plan. Transect District T3.2 is a significant component of residential development intensity envisioned in the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. It is appropriate for use in residential districts and is applied in relatively limited quantities through the Montava design. The uses transition intensity to aid in compatibility with neighboring properties, natural areas, and T3.1. 2.4.4. Transect District T4 General Urban Neighborhood a. There are three (3) Land Use Code zone districts (LMN, E and I) underlying Transect District T4. The following uses and types of review are permitted in Transect District T4; ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 130 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 20 ooooffff 99994444 such uses and types of review modify the types of review and uses in the underlying zone districts. Transect District T4 General Urban Neighborhood Uses Type of RRRReeeevvvviiiieeeewwww Single-family detached BDR Single-family attached BDR Two-family dwellings BDR Accessory Dwelling Unit Type I Mixed Use Dwellings BDR Extra occupancy rental house BDR Group Home Type I Multi-family (all) BDR Long term care facility (assisted living and independent living) Type I Commercial/Retails uses (under 2,000 sf) Type I Food membership distribution site Type I Food catering or small food product preparation Type I Short Term Rentals (Primary) BDR Bed and breakfast up to 6 rooms Type I Lodging establishment (Inn up to 12 rooms) Type I Solar Energy Systems, small and medium Type I Public and private schools-all levels Type II Public Use BDR Minor Public Facilities Type I Neighborhood Support/rec facilities (general assembly) Type I Places of worship or assembly (religious assembly) Type II Community Facilities Type I Parks and Recreation Type I Open-air farmers market BDR Urban Agriculture BDR Off-site construction staging BDR ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 131 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 21 ooooffff 99994444 Outdoor vendor BDR Accessory uses BDR Accessory buildings BDR b. The General Urban Neighborhood uses proposed for Transect District T4 are not contrary to the public good and satisfy the criteria of Land Use Code Section 4.29(E)(2): i. The uses advance the purpose and objectives of the applicable PUD Overlay provisions set forth in Sections 4.29 (A) and (B) and the principles and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans and policies. See Subsections 2.2.A and 2.2.B and Chapter 10 of the Design Narrative. In addition, Transect District T4 is the most diverse of Montava’s districts, implementing mixed-use and mixed- intensity at the neighborhood scale. Transect T4 is the most widely applied transect in Montava’s plan. From a residential development standpoint, T4 ranges from small single-family dwellings through cottage clusters and townhomes, to multi-family and live-work units. From a non-residential development standpoint, T4 allows for a wide range of small-scale businesses to be integrated into the neighborhood fabric. The district allows for diverse and innovative development that can flex in intensity and character, allowing it to transition to medium intensity areas like T3.2 and Storybook, and to high intensity areas like T5. Transect District T4 district provides open space in the form of plazas, squares, greens, pocket parks, playgrounds, and linear open spaces with trails. Open space is distributed throughout the district and diversified in its format and recreational activities. At the smaller end, cottage cluster greens may be used for community gardens, social gathering space such as outdoor neighborhood kitchens, or play areas for children. At the larger end, plaza and squares provide space for higher intensity activities and unstructured sports. Transect District T4 is an area of very efficient land use, which retains a neighborhood character. These in-town neighborhood areas support activities in the Town Center and the Farm due to proximity, allowing residents convenient access to daily needs by walking and cycling. While providing PV systems is more challenging in T4, the smaller size of each unit reduces the amount or PV required, which is easily provided on rooftops and in parking areas. Numerous multi-dwelling or multi-tenant options increase the efficiency of T4, while the building form requirements maintain compatibility. In particular, T4 is where buildings cluster around active, shared open spaces, implementing many of the neighborhood fabric goals of the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. ii. The uses comply with applicable LUC provisions regarding the natural environment, including but not limited to water, air, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the natural functioning of the environment and must continue to comply with each preliminary development plan submitted pursuant to the PUD Master Plan. Transect District T4 is more human-oriented than natural, a transition between the more naturalistic neighborhood districts of T3.2 and the very intense T5. T4 implements the LZ2 dark sky zone, which follows the transect transition in intensity. The small lots provide for limited on-site storm water mitigation, which is fulfilled primarily in open spaces – linear parks, civic greens, and clustered greens – and through storm water corridors.Storm water management itself is a key design component of Montava, where natural topographic features ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 132 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 22 ooooffff 99994444 define the location and functioning of constructed storm water systems. Storm water is managed through vegetated channels and distributed open spaces where it is cleaned and conveyed to regional systems. Some component of the storm water system passes through each of the transect districts. iii. The uses are compatible with the other uses proposed for Montava and with the uses permitted in the zone district or districts adjacent to this transect district.Within the developed portions of Montava, the transect concept is used to ensure compatibility between uses across the site by incrementally transitioning intensity of use from lower intensity districts, T2 and T3.1, through the medium intensity district, T3.2, to the higher intensity districts of T4 and T5. The transect directs changes in use intensity, changes in building intensity, changes in intensity of impervious surfaces and landscaping, changes in hardness/softness of materials, and changes in lighting, all components of compatibility.Transect District T4 is moderately high in intensity, transitioning from lower intensity areas like T3.2 and Storybook to T5. T4 provides for a mix of housing types and family configurations, and small, neighborhood- centric businesses. T4 is used broadly throughout Montava, buffered from lower intensity land uses by T3, and providing the neighborhood intensity needed to support Montava’s Town Center. T4 areas support retail and employment areas as well as providing the social and fiscal support needed for Montava’s open space amenities. Within Montava, T4 plays an important role in transitioning intensity to ensure compatibility. It is located adjacent to Storybook, which is equivalent to T3.2 within Montava, and it is located adjacent to Mountain Vista Drive and Giddings Road, arterial roadways which are best buffered from lower intensity residential uses by higher intensity uses that have hardier materials, buffering noise. iv. The uses are appropriate for this transect district within the PUD Master Plan. Transect District T4 is the primary component of residential and mixed-use neighborhood intensity envisioned in the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. It is used broadly within Montava, appropriately buffered from existing residential uses. T4 is lower in intensity than the existing E and I zones. T4 is a component of LMN, which includes portions of T3 as well. The General Urban Neighborhood uses are key in supporting the more intensive non-residential areas of Montava. 2.4.5. Transect District T5 Urban Center / Mixed Use a. There are three (3) Land Use Code zone districts (LMN, E and I) underlying Transect District T5. The following uses and types of review are permitted in Transect District T5; such uses and types of review modify the types of review and uses in the underlying zone districts. Transect District T5 Urban Center / Mixed Use Uses Type of Review Single-family detached BDR Single-family attached BDR Two-family dwellings BDR Accessory Dwelling Units Type I Mixed Use Dwellings BDR Extra occupancy rental house BDR ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 133 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 23 ooooffff 99994444 Group Home Type I Multi-family (all) BDR Long term care facility (assisted living and independent living) Type II Commercial/Retail uses (all) Type I Food membership distribution site Type I Food catering or small food product preparation Type I Public and private schools-all levels Type II Short Term Rentals (Primary) BDR Bed and breakfast up to 6 rooms Type I Lodging establishment (Inn up to 12 rooms, over 12 rooms, and hotel) Type II Workshop and custom small industry Type I Light Industrial Type II Solar Energy Systems, small and medium Type I Public and private schools-all levels Type II Public Use BDR Minor Public Facilities BDR Major Public Facilities Type I Neighborhood Support/rec facilities (general assembly) Type I Places of worship or assembly (religious assembly) Type II Community Facilities Type I Parks and Recreation Type I Plant Nurseries and Greenhouses Type II Open-air farmers market BDR Urban Agriculture BDR Off-site construction staging BDR Parking garages, lots and structures BDR Outdoor vendor BDR Accessory uses BDR Accessory buildings BDR b. The Urban Center / Mixed Use uses proposed for Transect District T5 are not contrary to the public good and satisfy the criteria of Land Use Code Section 4.29(E)(2): i. The uses advance the purpose and objectives of the applicable PUD Overlay provisions set forth in Sections 4.29 (A) and (B) and the principles and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans and policies. See Subsections 2.2.A and 2.2.B and Chapter 10 of the Design Narrative. Transect ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 134 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 24 ooooffff 99994444 District T5 is the intensive core of Montava. T5 is fully mixed-use and high intensity. Transect T5 is concentrated around the intersects of Mountain Vista Drive with Timberline Road and Giddings Road, implementing the Community Commercial and Employment components of the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. In addition to commercial and employment, T5 includes a significant multi- family housing component, stand-alone and mixed-use. Direct integration between high intensity residential uses and commercial and employment areas is necessary for the success of those areas. Additionally, Montava’s T5 includes public institutions and affordable housing, located along the Mountain Vista Drive enhanced transportation corridor. T5 provides the greatest use diversity in Montava, in a concentrated format to promote vibrancy. Transect District T5 provides open space in the form of plazas, squares, compact greens, pocket parks, and linear open spaces with trails. Open space is distributed throughout the district and diversified in its format and recreational activities. Within the core of the district, open space areas are programmed with public institutions, recreational amenities, and designed for active social gathering. The use intensity and design formality of T5’s open spaces follows the transect innovation connecting development intensity with social and recreational intensity. The Town Center –T5 – also supports the Community Park which is adjacent. A secondary area of T5 provides support to the Farm and adjacent neighborhoods in the northern end of Montava. Transect District T5 is an area of very efficient and intensive land use. By utilizing shared parking in T5, excessive parking areas and related drive aisles, curb cuts, and infrastructure is reduced, improving storm water management and heat island issues. Buildings in T5 are larger in scale than other districts, providing larger roof areas for PV, including flat roofs. Shared parking areas offer space for larger PV installations which will be privately managed. Overall, T5 is an important component of the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan, and a key cultural asset to Montava and the City. ii. The uses comply with applicable LUC provisions regarding the natural environment, including but not limited to water, air, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the natural functioning of the environment and must continue to comply with each preliminary development plan submitted pursuant to the PUD Master Plan. Transect District T5 is a human-centric area, comprised of more hardscape than softscape. T5 includes more intense lighting, LZ3, noise, and little on-site storm water management. Storm water is managed collectively, fulfilled through shared spaces off-site. The intensity of T5 allows it to take as little space as possible, which provides for the transition to T4, T3.2, T3.1 and T2 prior to natural areas, limiting its impact. Storm water management itself is a key design component of Montava, where natural topographic features define the location and functioning of constructed storm water systems. Storm water is managed through vegetated channels and distributed open spaces where it is cleaned and conveyed to regional systems. Some component of the storm water system passes through each of the transect districts. iii. The uses are compatible with the other uses proposed for Montava and with the uses permitted in the zone district or districts adjacent of this transect district. Within the developed portions of Montava, the transect concept is used to ensure compatibility between uses across the site by incrementally transitioning ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 135 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 25 ooooffff 99994444 intensity of use from lower intensity districts, T2 and T3.1, through the medium intensity district of T3.2, to the higher intensity districts of T4 and T5. The transect directs changes in use intensity, changes in building intensity, changes in intensity of impervious surfaces and landscaping, changes in hardness/softness of materials, and changes in lighting, all components of compatibility. Transect District T5 is the highest intensity district, fully mixed-use. It fulfills the goals of mixed-use commercial and employment areas envisioned in the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. T5 is buffered from lower intensity residential uses by T4, ensuring compatibility. The location of T5 supports the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan’s Community Commercial and Employment core, providing a compatible use with future development south of Mountain Vista. Its location along Mountain Vista Drive is also supportive of the capacity of the roadway, its impact on adjacent uses, and the enhanced transportation corridor designation. iv. The uses are appropriate for this transect district within the PUD Mast Plan. Transect District T5 is the primary mixed-use commercial and employment component of Montava, supporting the form envisioned in the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. T5 is closely related to the uses and intensities of the existing E zone. It is located along the most intensive arterial roadways in the area, and their intersections. 2.4.6. (S) - Natural Areas and Stormwater Special District a. There are two (2) Land Use Code zone districts (E and I) underlying the (S) - Natural Areas and Stormwater Special District. The following uses and types of review are permitted in (S); such uses and types of review modify the types of review and uses in the underlying zone districts. (S) - Natural Areas and Stormwater Special District Uses Type of Review Public Use BDR Minor Public Facilities Type I Parks and Recreation Type I Open Lands BDR Urban Agriculture Type I Off-site construction staging BDR Accessory buildings BDR Accessory uses BDR b. The uses proposed for (S) – Natural Areas and Stormwater Special District are not contrary to the public good and satisfy the criteria of Land Use Code Section 4.29(E)(2): i. The uses advance the purpose and objectives of the applicable PUD Overlay provisions set forth in Sections 4.29 (A) and (B) and the principles and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans and policies. See Subsections 2.2.A and 2.2.B and Chapter 10 of the Design Narrative. In addition, the (S) - Natural Areas and Stormwater Special District is designed to combine significant areas of off- ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 136 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 26 ooooffff 99994444 site stormwater management with natural areas to create a lasting amenity that protects wildlife corridors. While the (S) District is generally located along the Cooper Slough, Montava’s design incorporates key trail connections throughout the community which extend the impact of the natural area. Along the transect, this natural area district provides a respite from development. Within the (S) District, development is severely limited, focused on providing public amenities along with regional storm water management. This district provides an amenity to Montava as well as the City as a whole, expanding natural areas protection and connecting trail systems. ii. The uses comply with applicable LUC provisions regarding the natural environment, including but not limited to water, air, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the natural functioning of the environment and must continue to comply with each preliminary development plan submitted pursuant to the PUD Master Plan. The (S) - Natural Areas and Stormwater Special District assists surrounding areas and portions of Montava with storm water compliance. Severely limited in development, the district provides a respite from noise and light for wildlife and large areas for vegetation. iii. The uses are compatible with the other uses proposed for Montava and with the uses permitted in the zone district or districts adjacent to this district. Within the developed portions of Montava, the transect [I do not know what to use here if this is a District because I do not know if “District concept” makes sense.]concept is used to ensure compatibility between uses across the site by incrementally transitioning intensity of use from lower intensity districts, T2 and T3.1, through the medium intensity district of T3.2, to the higher intensity districts, T4 and T5. The transect directs changes in use intensity, changes in building intensity, changes in intensity of impervious surfaces and landscaping, changes in hardness/softness of materials, and changes in lighting, all components of compatibility. The (S) - Natural Areas and Stormwater Special District provides the lowest intensity of land use in the form of natural lands. This district provides amenities to adjacent districts. iv. The uses are appropriate for the district within the PUD Master Plan. The (S) - Natural Areas and Stormwater Special District is necessary for managing off-site storm water in the Cooper Slough, and storm water produced through the development. Its location follows pre-existing water flows, which also serves to buffer new development from adjacent industrial uses. 2.4.7. (I) - Industrial and Employment Special District a. There is one (1) Land Use Code zone district (I) underlying the (I) - Industrial and Employment Special District. The following uses and types of review are permitted in the (I) - Industrial and Employment Special District; such uses and types of review modify the types of review and uses in the underlying zone district including the provisions of LUC Sec. 4.27(D)(2) which categorize uses as primary or secondary and limit the area of secondary uses. (I) - Industrial and Employment Special District Uses Type of Review All uses in the I-Industrial zone district of the LUC Per LUC ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 137 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 27 ooooffff 99994444 All uses in the E-Employment zone district of the LUC Per LUC Public Use Per LUC Accessory buildings Per LUC Accessory uses Per LUC b. The uses proposed for the (I) - Industrial and Employment Special District are not contrary to the public good and satisfy the criteria of Land Use Code Section 4.29(E)(2): i. The uses advance the purpose and objectives of the applicable PUD Overlay provisions set forth in Sections 4.29 (A) and (B) and the principles and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans and policies. See Subsections 2.2.A and 2.2.B and Chapter 10 of the Design Narrative. In addition, note that the new (I) - Industrial and Employment Special District continues and expands upon the uses envisioned in the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. The (I) - Industrial and Employment Special District allows for a combination of the various employment and industrial uses defined in the LUC and, without the distinction between primary and secondary uses and without a maximum amount of secondary uses as set forth in LUC Sec. 4.27(D)(2), this array of uses provides the best opportunities for success in attracting employment and industrial users and the ability to respond to market conditions and demands. The combination of both employment and industrial uses diversifies the overall uses within Montava. ii. The uses comply with applicable LUC provisions regarding the natural environment, including but not limited to water, air, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the natural functioning of the environment and must continue to comply with each preliminary development plan submitted pursuant to the PUD Master Plan. Development in the (I) - Industrial and Employment District will comply with applicable LUC provisions regarding the natural environment. iii. The uses are compatible with the other uses proposed for Montava and with the uses permitted in the zone district or districts adjacent to this district. The portion of Montava where the (I) - Industrial and Employment District is located is cut off from the remainder of the development by industrial uses, and a railway. The area itself is further isolated by the freeway and canal and adjacent storm water management areas. The Industrial District is an area in isolation, which is ideal for many industrial and employment uses. iv. The uses are appropriate for the property or properties within the PUD Overlay: The (I) - Industrial and Employment Special District allows for a wide variety of industrial and employment uses and provides diversification to the overall PUD Overlay. 2.4.8. (P) - Community Park Special District a. There are two (2) Land Use Code zone districts (LMN and E) underlying the (P) - Community Park Special District. The following uses and types of review are ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 138 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 2:UUUUsssseeee 28 ooooffff 99994444 permitted in the (P) - Community Park Special District; such uses and types of review modify the types of review and uses in the underlying zone districts. (P) - Community Park Special District Uses Type of Review Neighborhood Parks Per LUC Public Use Per LUC Accessory buildings Per LUC Accessory uses Per LUC 2.4.9. Poudre School (PSD) Special District a. There is one (1) Land Use Code zone district (E) underlying the Poudre School (PSD) Special District. The following uses and types of review are permitted in the Poudre School (PSD) Special District; such uses and types of review modify the types of review and uses in the underlying zone district. Poudre School (PSD) Special District Uses Type of Review Public and private schools for elementary, intermediate and high school education, and for vocational and technical training Per LUC Public Use Per LUC Accessory buildings Per LUC Accessory uses Per LUC ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 139 Montava DDDDeeeevvvveeeellllooooppppmmmmeeeennnntttt SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 3:Density Density 29 ooooffff 99994444 3. DENSITY 3.1. REQUEST FFFFOOOORRRR MODIFIED DENSITIES 3.1.1. Section 4.29(G)(1) allows for the modification of densities set forth in the LUC as part of a PUD Master Plan provided such modified densities satisfy the criteria of LUC Sections 4.29(E)(2)(a) through (d). 3.1.2. The modified densities in Chapter 3 shall apply to all development in the Montava PUD Master Plan. Such densities modify all LUC standards related to density in Article 3 and Divisions 4.5, 4.27 and 4.28 of the LUC. 3.1.3. Amendments to the approved densities of this Montava PUD Master Plan shall be in accordance with LUC Section 4.29(I)(2) and Sections 2.2.10(A) and (B). 3.2. DESCRIPTION OF MODIFIED DENSITIES 3.2.1. The densities below are calculated for each anticipated development phase of Montava. The densities represent estimates of the minimum and maximum numbers of dwelling units per net developable area per phase, with net developable area estimated to be approximately sixty to seventy percent (60-70%) of the gross acreage of each phase. Net developable area will be calculated per current LUC definition for same at the time of development of the individual phase. Note that the portions of each development phase that are located in the Industrial and Employment District or in the T2 Rural / Farm Transect are excluded from the phase size and the density calculations for that phase, since the developed uses will be primarily nonresidential. Accessory dwelling units are not counted in the calculations of minimum and/or maximum densities. For informational purposes, this type of dwelling unit is estimated to add additional density at the rate specified in Table 3-1.1. 3.2.2. The boundaries of the phases identified in Table 3.1-1 are generally depicted on the Development Phasing Plan shown below in Figure 2. The Applicant anticipates that development phase boundaries may be adjusted over the 25 to 30-year build out of Montava, generally pursuant to minor amendments of the Development Phasing Plan for the Montava PUD Master Plan. 3.3. DENSITY BBBBYYYY PPPPHHHHAAAASSSSEEEE 3.3.1. Each development phase in Montava is limited in density as specified in Table 3-1.1. a. Industrial portions of each phase are not included in the phase size or density calculations. Industrial areas do not include density limitations. b. T2 portions of each phase are not included in the phase size or density calculations. T2 is agricultural in nature and falls well below density thresholds. c. Phase size is an estimate following graphic phase boundaries and may vary in phase submittals. 3.3.2. Density is calculated as the total number of dwelling units divided by the net developable area of each phase, including lots and alleys, and excluding streets and open spaces. a. Net developable area is estimated as 60% of the gross area of each phase and may vary in phase submittals. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 140 Montava DDDDeeeevvvveeeellllooooppppmmmmeeeennnntttt SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 3:Density Density 30 ooooffff 99994444 b. Accessory dwelling units are estimated to add additional density at the rate specified in Table 3-1.1. c. Following existing zone districts in the Land Use Code, maximum density is not specified. Maximum density is limited by use, lot size, and parking requirements. d. Phases 1b, 3b, and 5b do not define a minimum density as these areas include a significant non-residential component, supported by adjacent housing in other phases. Figure 2- Development Phasing Plan ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 141 Montava DDDDeeeevvvveeeellllooooppppmmmmeeeennnntttt SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 3:Density Density 31 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 3.3333--1.DDDDEEEENNNNSSSSIIIITTTTYYYY BBBBYYYY PPPPHHHHAAAASSSSEEEE PHASE SIZE MINIMUM DENSITY ADD. ADU DENSITY T3.1 T3.2 T4 T5 1a 38.34 ac 10 du/ac 3 du/ac ✓ ✓ 1b Farm n/a n/a 1b Town Center 35.67 ac n/a 2 du/ac ✓ ✓ 2a 51.6 ac 10 du/ac 3 du/ac ✓ ✓ ✓ 2b 20.64 ac 18 du/ac 2 du/ac ✓ ✓ 3a 39.76 ac 10 du/ac 3 du/ac ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 3b Mountain Vista East 38.88 ac n/a 5 du/ac ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 3b Town Center 16.17 ac n/a 0 du/ac ✓ 4a 50.69 ac 7 du/ac 5 du/ac ✓ ✓ ✓ 4b 43.25 ac 10 du/ac 3 du/ac ✓ ✓ 5a 45.06 ac 7 du/ac 6 du/ac ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 5b Town Center 28.89 ac n/a 0 du/ac ✓ 6 41.87 ac 7 du/ac 6 du/ac ✓ ✓ ✓ TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 3.3333--2222..DDDDEEEENNNNSSSSIIIITTTTIIIIEEEESSSS OF OOOFFF EEEEXXXXIIIISSSSTTTTIIIINNNNGGGG UUUUNNNNDDDDEEEERRRRLLLLYYYYIIIINNNNGGGG ZZZZOOOONNNNEEEE DDDDIIIISSSSTTTTRRRRIIIICCCCTTTTSSSS ZONE DISTRICT MINIMUM DENSITY MAXIMUM DENSITY L-M-N <20 acres = 4 du/ac >20 acres = 3 du/ac 12 du/ac Employment 7 du/ac n/a Industrial n/a n/a ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 142 Montava DDDDeeeevvvveeeellllooooppppmmmmeeeennnntttt SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 3:Density Density 32 ooooffff 99994444 3.4. JUSTIFICATION FFFFOOOORRRR DENSITY MMMMOOOODDDDIIIIFFFFIIIICCCCAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNNSSSS 3.4.1. There are four LUC criteria for the modification of densities in LUC Sections 4.29(G)(a) through (d). As required by Section 4.29(G)(a), the modified densities in this Chapter 3 are consistent with the purposes and advance the objectives of the PUD Overlay as described in LUC Sections 4.29 (A) and (B); please see the explanation in Chapter 2.2 of the Design Narrative. The modified densities are also consistent with numerous principles and policies of the City adopted plans and policies as required by Section 4.29(G)(d). See the list of such principles and policies set forth in Chapter 10 of the Design Narrative. 3.4.2. As required by Sections 4.29(G)(b) and (c), such modified densities significantly advance and are necessary for the achievement of the development objectives of Montava as described in Chapter 2 of the Design Narrative. Montava’s neighborhoods range in density similar to the range described by the Land Use Code categories of Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood District (L-M-N), Medium Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood District (M-M-N), and High Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood District (H-M-N). The layout of neighborhoods and Commercial Centers is also similar to that anticipated by the LUC’s mixed-use districts, with low density neighborhoods clustered around medium and high-density neighborhoods, centered on community commercial. Current zoning of the site includes districts L-M-N, which has a minimum density of 3 and 4 du/ac and a maximum density of 12 du/ac, zone district E which has a minimum density of 7 du/ac but not maximum density, and I, which does not have maximum nor minimum density standards. Montava’s arrangement of neighborhoods, which is directly supportive of the LUC’s mixed-use districts intent, follows boundaries that differ from the underlying zoning. Overall, the neighborhoods layout supports the minimum density goals of efficient use of land, while the site in general is not significantly encumbered by maximum density restrictions. 3.4.3. The density modifications are designed to align allowable densities with the neighborhood structure of Montava, which differs from the underlying zoning. Respecting existing adjacent development, those neighborhoods in Montava nearest existing development are assigned a density range that is similar to existing L-M-N zoning in those areas. In the remaining neighborhoods of Montava, densities are designed to implement low, medium, and high density mixed-use, clustered in the format anticipated by the LUC’s mixed-use districts intent. The densities reflect a wide range of housing types in each neighborhood, a standard which exists in the LUC’s L-M-N zone, but not in the other mixed-use districts. Implementing varied housing types and uses in each neighborhood leads to greater diversification in support of the intent of mixed-use. 3.4.4. In addition to base density, the additional density is provided by Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). ADUs support many City goals, including more efficient use of land and affordable housing. However the density standards in the LUC do not currently account for ADUs, particularly in the L-M-N zone which has maximum density restrictions. Interestingly, it is in the low intensity mixed-use condition that ADUs have the most potential, where there is a higher prevalence of larger lots and potential for detached or semi-detached garages. The PUD Master Plan provides density increases commensurate with each area’s potential for including Accessory Dwelling Units. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 143 Montava Uses,Densities,Densi ties, aaaannnndddd Development Standards Standards CH 4:Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss Overview 33 ooooffff 99994444 4. DEVELOPMENT SSSSTTTTAAAANNNNDDDDAAAARRRRDDDDSSSS OVERVIEW 4.1. REQUEST FFFFOOOORRRR MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT SSSSTTTTAAAANNNNDDDDAAAARRRRDDDDSSSS 4.1.1. The ability to utilize a set of customized development standards to achieve flexibility in the design of a large, complex master plan is a key component of a PUD Overlay and the Montava PUD Master Plan. The modified development standards in the subsequent Chapters are crafted to enable the realization of the Montava development concept and vision which, in turn, will provide benefits to the community that would not otherwise be achievable. 4.1.2. Pursuant to LUC Section 4.29(G)(1), the LUC requirements in Article 3 and in Division 4.5 - Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood District (L-M-N), Division 4.27 - Employment District (E) and Division 4.28 - Industrial District (I) of Article 4 of the LUC which are related to the subject matter of Chapters 5 through 13 are modified by the approval of the development standards in Chapters 5 through 13. 4.1.3. Amendments to the approved development standards of this Montava PUD Master Plan shall be in accordance with LUC Section 4.29(I)(2) and Sections 2.2.10(A) and (B). 4.2. DESCRIPTION OF MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 4.2.1. The modified development standards in Chapters 5 through 13 include standards related to the following: Lots and Buildings (lot size and coverage, setbacks, height, building orientation and frontage, shopfronts, fences and walls, and lighting); Parking (vehicular and bicycle location, access and landscaping); Landscaping (materials and plant lists); Signage (type, number and area); Architectural Character; Civic Space (location, size and programming) and related Definitions. 4.2.2. Montava’s design relies upon coordination between development standards and the PUD Master Plan to achieve community goals. Generally, the development standards and design of Montava are aligned with the vision and goals of the LUC; both intend to produce walkable, mixed-use places with buildings and open spaces that work together harmoniously and in support of a shared public and social fabric. The LUC, however, addresses new development and changes to existing development in ways that are not necessarily expressive of LUC goals, with an incremental application of standards that encourages existing development to align more closely with contemporary goals. It is a hybrid code, including progressive form-based code elements with conventional elements addressing legacy development patterns. Montava’s development standards effectively direct form- centric development by their ability to be targeted, as opposed to being applicable to a wide variety of potential applications. Montava’s plan and development standards together craft design of the project which, in turn, creates a large, diverse, walkable, mixed-use community and an interconnected series of neighborhoods, centers, and open spaces. 4.3. COMPLIANCE WITH CCCCRRRRIIIITTTTEEEERRRRIIIIAAAA OF LUC 4.29(G)(3) 4.3.1. There are four LUC criteria for modification of development standards in LUC Sections 4.29(G)(a) through (d). As required by Section 4.29(G)(a), the modified development standards in Chapters 5 through 13 are consistent with the purposes and advance the objectives of the PUD Overlay as described in LUC Sections 4.29 (A) and (B); see the explanation in Chapter 2.2 of the Design Narrative. The modified development standards are also consistent with numerous principles and policies of the City adopted plans and policies as required by Section 4.29(G)(d). See the list of such principles and policies in ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 144 Montava Uses,Densities,Densi ties, aaaannnndddd Development Standards Standards CH 4:Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss Overview 34 ooooffff 99994444 Chapter 10 of the Design Narrative. Following each Chapter is an in-depth explanation of how such modified development standards advance and are necessary for the achievement of the development objectives of Montava, as required by Sections 4.29(G)(b) and (c), which development objectives are more generally described in Chapter 2 of the Design Narrative. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 145 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 35 ooooffff 99994444 5. LOTS AAAANNNNDDDD BBBBUUUUIIIILLLLDDDDIIIINNNNGGGGSSSS 5.1. OVERVIEW 5.1.1. The development standards of this Chapter 5 for Lots and Buildings shall apply to all development in the Montava PUD Master Plan. Such development standards modify all LUC standards in Article 3 and Divisions 4.5, .27 and 4.28 thereof which regulate lots and buildings, with the exception of Division 3.8, Supplemental Regulations, which are the subject of Chapter 12. 5.2. SUMMARY OOOOFFFF STANDARDS 5.2.1. Tables 4.1-1 through 4.1-4 summarize a subset of standards applicable to transect districts, specified within this and other Chapters, for quick reference. a. Should there be a conflict between the standards summarized in Tables 4.1-1 through 4.1- 4 and the standards specified elsewhere in text and tables, the standards specified elsewhere in text and tables prevails. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 146 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 36 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..2222--1.T5 TTT555 SSSSTTTTAAAANNNNDDDDAAAARRRRDDDDSSSS SSSSUUUUMMMMMMMMAAAARRRRYYYY SETBACKS IIIILLLLLLLLUUUUSSSSTTTTRRRRAAAATTTTEEEEDDDD LOTS FRONTAGE A Lot Width 20 ft. - 500 ft. Permitted Yard Types Urban, Pedestrian Forecourt, Shallow, Door B Lot Depth 30 ft. min. Glazing - Ground Floor 60% - 90% Lot Area 200,000 sf. max. Glazing - Upper Floors 30% - 60% Occupation / Coverage 90% max. / 100% max. Projections Arcade, Gallery, Canopy, Marquee, Awning SETBACKS: AAAALLLLLLLL SSSSTTTTRRRRUUUUCCCCTTTTUUUURRRREEEESSSS BUILDING HEIGHT HEIGHT C Front 2 ft. - 12 ft. Principal Building 4 stories max. D Side Street 2 ft. - 12 ft. Outbuildings & Structures 4 stories max. E Side 0 ft. or 5 ft. min. STORY HHHHEEEEIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTT F Rear & Rear Alley 0 ft. min. & 15 ft. min. From Alley Centerline Ground Floor Residential 10 ft. - 18 ft. Ground Floor Non- residential 16 ft. - 25 ft. Upper Stories 10 ft. - 14 ft. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 147 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 37 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..2222--2.T4 TTT444 SSSSTTTTAAAANNNNDDDDAAAARRRRDDDDSSSS SSSSUUUUMMMMMMMMAAAARRRRYYYY SETBACKS IIIILLLLLLLLUUUUSSSSTTTTRRRRAAAATTTTEEEEDDDD LOTS FRONTAGE A Lot Width 20 ft. - 250 ft. Permitted Yard Types Fenced, Shallow, Forecourt, Door, Cottage Court B Lot Depth 50 ft. min. Glazing - Ground Floor 30% - 50% Lot Area 60,000 sf. max. Glazing - Upper Floors 30% - 50% Occupation / Coverage 80% max. / 90% max. Projections Enclosed Porch, Open Porch, Stoop, Terrace SETBACKS: PPPPRRRRIIIINNNNCCCCIIIIPPPPAAAALLLL BBBBUUUUIIIILLLLDDDDIIIINNNNGGGGSSSS BUILDING HEIGHT HEIGHT C Front 8 ft. - 16 ft. Principal Building 3 stories max. D Side Street 6 ft. min. Outbuildings & Structures 2 stories max. E Side 0 ft. or 5 ft. min. STORY HHHHEEEEIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTT F Rear & Rear Alley 0 ft. min. & 15 ft. min. From Alley Centerline Ground Floor 10 ft. - 14 ft. SETBACKS: OOOOUUUUTTTTBBBBUUUUIIIILLLLDDDDIIIINNNNGGGGSSSS Upper Stories 8 ft. - 12 ft. Front 2 ft. min. Side Street 2 ft. min. Side 0 ft. or 5 ft. min. Rear & Rear Alley 0 ft. min. & 15 ft. min. From Alley Centerline ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 148 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 38 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..2222--3.T3.2 T3.2 SSSSTTTTAAAANNNNDDDDAAAARRRRDDDDSSSS SSSSUUUUMMMMMMMMAAAARRRRYYYY SETBACKS IIIILLLLLLLLUUUUSSSSTTTTRRRRAAAATTTTEEEEDDDD LOTS FRONTAGE A Lot Width 30 ft. min. Permitted Yard Types Continuous Yard B Lot Depth 70 ft. min. Glazing - Ground Floor n/a Lot Area No max. Glazing - Upper Floors n/a Occupation / Coverage 70% max. / 75% max. Projections Enclosed Porch, Open Porch, Stoop SETBACKS: PPPPRRRRIIIINNNNCCCCIIIIPPPPAAAALLLL BBBBUUUUIIIILLLLDDDDIIIINNNNGGGGSSSS BUILDING HEIGHT HEIGHT C Front 12 ft. min. Principal Building 2 stories max. D Side Street 6 ft. min. Outbuildings & Structures 2 stories max. E Side 6 ft. min. STORY HHHHEEEEIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTT F Rear 12 ft. min. Ground Floor 9 ft. - 12 ft. G Rear Alley 15 ft. min. From Alley Centerline Upper Stories 8 ft. - 10 ft. SETBACKS: OOOOUUUUTTTTBBBBUUUUIIIILLLLDDDDIIIINNNNGGGGSSSS H Front 2 ft. min. I Side Street 4 ft. min. J Side 6 ft. min. K Rear 6 ft. min. L Rear Alley 15 ft. min. From Alley Centerline ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 149 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 39 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5.2222--4.T3.1 T3.1 SSSSTTTTAAAANNNNDDDDAAAARRRRDDDDSSSS SSSSUUUUMMMMMMMMAAAARRRRYYYY SETBACKS IIIILLLLLLLLUUUUSSSSTTTTRRRRAAAATTTTEEEEDDDD LOTS FRONTAGE A Lot Width 50 ft. min. Permitted Yard Types Continuous Yard B Lot Depth 80 ft. min. Glazing - Ground Floor n/a Lot Area No max. Glazing - Upper Floors n/a Occupation / Coverage 60% max. / 65% max. Projections Enclosed Porch, Open Porch, Stoop SETBACKS: PPPPRRRRIIIINNNNCCCCIIIIPPPPAAAALLLL BBBBUUUUIIIILLLLDDDDIIIINNNNGGGGSSSS BUILDING HEIGHT HEIGHT C Front 16 ft. min. Principal Building 2 stories max. D Side Street 10 ft. min. Outbuildings & Structures 2 stories max. E Side 10 ft. min. STORY HHHHEEEEIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTT F Rear 12 ft. min. Ground Floor 9 ft. - 12 ft. G Rear Alley 20 ft. min. Upper Stories 8 ft. - 10 ft. SETBACKS: OOOOUUUUTTTTBBBBUUUUIIIILLLLDDDDIIIINNNNGGGGSSSS &SSSSTTTTRRRRUUUUCCCCTTTTUUUURRRREEEESSSS H Front 30 ft. min. I Side Street 6 ft. min. J Side 6 ft. min. K Rear 6 ft. min. L Rear Alley 15 ft. min. From Alley Centerline ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 150 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 40 ooooffff 99994444 5.3. LOT SIZE 5.3.1. Lot size must meet the minimum standards specified in Table 5.2-1. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..3333--1.MINIMUM MMMIIINNNIIIMMMUUUMMM LLLLOOOOTTTT SSSSIIIIZZZZEEEE DISTRICT WIDTH DEPTH AREA T5 20 ft. min. 500 ft. max. 30 ft. min. 200,000 sf. max. T4 20 ft. min. 250 ft. max. 50 ft. min. 60,000 sf. max. T3.2 30 ft. min. 70 ft. min. No max. T3.1 50 ft. min. 80 ft. min. No max. 5.4. LOT OCCUPATION AAAANNNNDDDD COVERAGE 5.4.1. Buildings and covered structures are limited in the total area they may occupy as a percentage of the gross lot area as specified in Table 5.3-1 as occupation. 5.4.2. Impervious surfaces are limited in the total area they may occupy as a percentage of the gross lot area as specified in Table 4.3-1 as coverage. a. Lot coverage categories for the purpose of the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual are allocated as follows: i. T5 is equivalent to Commercial or Residential High Density; ii. T4 is equivalent to Residential High Density; iii. T3.2 is equivalent to Residential Medium Density; and iv. T3.1 is equivalent to Residential Low Density. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..4444--1.LOT LLLOOOTTT OOOOCCCCCCCCUUUUPPPPAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNN AAAANNNNDDDD CCCCOOOOVVVVEEEERRRRAAAAGGGGEEEE DISTRICT OCCUPATION COVERAGE T5 90% max. 100% max. T4 80% max. 90% max. T3.2 70% max. 75% max. T3.1 60% max. 65% max. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 151 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 41 ooooffff 99994444 5.5. SETBACKS 5.5.1. Required Setbacks a. All structures must be set back from the lot boundaries as specified in Table 5.4-1, as illustrated in Tables 5.1-1 to 5.1-4 and Table 5.4-2, and as follows: i. Front specifies the setback from the front lot line. (1) Elements that project forward from frontage facades are permitted to project into front setbacks as specified in Section 5.7.6. (2) The front lot line is the lot line associated with the address. (3) In T5 and T4, townhouses may exceed the maximum setback when designed with a door yard frontage yard. ii. Side Street specifies the setback from from any lot line abutting a street other than the front lot line. (1) In T5 and T4, where there are multiple structures on one lot, the side street maximum setback applies to only the nearest structure. (2) Elements that project forward from frontage facades are permitted to project into side street setbacks as specified in Section 5.8.6. iii. Side specifies the setback from side lot lines other than those qualifying for a side street setback. iv. Rear specifies the setback from the rear lot line, except where abutting an alley. v. Rear Alley specifies the setback from the rear lot line in instances that it abuts an alley. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..5555--1. RRRREEEEQQQQUUUUIIIIRRRREEEEDDDD SSSSEEEETTTTBBBBAAAACCCCKKKKSSSS DISTRICT BUILDING FRONT SIDE STREET SIDE REAR REAR ALLEY T5 All Structures 2 ft. min. 12 ft. max. 2 ft. min. 12 ft. max. 0 ft. or 5 ft. min. 0 ft. min. 0 ft. min. T4 Principal Buildings 8 ft. min. 16 ft. max. 2 ft. min. 0 ft. or 5 ft. min. 0 ft. min. 0 ft. min. T4 Outbuildings 2 ft. min. 2 ft. min. 0 ft. or 5 ft. min. 0 ft. min. Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 42 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..5555--2.TYPICAL TTTYYYPPPIIICCCAAALLL SSSSEEEETTTTBBBBAAAACCCCKKKK LLLLOOOOCCCCAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNNSSSS SETBACK TYPICAL LOCATION A Front B Side Street C Side D Rear Alley E Rear 5.5.2. Setbacks from Arterial Roadways a. Single family residential buildings must be setback a minimum of 30ft from arterial roadways, except where exterior walls meet STC 50 or above. b. Multi-family residential buildings must be setback a minimum of 15ft from arterial roadways., except where exterior walls meet STC 50 or above. c. Residential components of mixed-use buildings must be setback a minimum of 15ft from arterial roadways, except where exterior walls meet STC 50 or above. i. This setback may be achieved in whole or part with a building step-back. 5.5.3. Garages a. In alley loaded configurations, where garages are part of the primary dwelling unit structure, the following conditions apply: i. Rear alley setback for outbuildings apply to the garage portion of the structure. ii. Rear alley setback for dwellings apply to all other portions of the structure, including rooms above garages. b. Accessory dwelling units above garages that are separate from the principle dwelling structure are subject to the outbuilding setback requirements. 5.5.4. Setback Considerations for Fire Access a. Where fire access is provided from the alley and eave height exceeds 30ft, additional rear alley setback may be required. b. Where fire access is provided from streets and eave height exceeds 30ft, buildings may be required to be located closer to lot lines than the minimum setback. 5.5.5. Setback Considerations for Utilities a. Utility easements along front, side, and side street lot lines may require additional front, side, and side street setback and cause buildings to exceed maximum setbacks. b. Utility services provided from the alley may require additional rear alley setbacks. c. Utility services may require easements at front, side, side street, or rear lot lines for meters, pedestals, and other equipment requirements. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 153 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 43 ooooffff 99994444 5.6. HEIGHT HEI GHT 5.6.1. The height of all structures is limited as specified in Table 5.5-1. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..6666--1.MAXIMUM MMMAAAXXXIIIMMMUUUMMM HHHHEEEEIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTT DISTRICT BUILDING MAXIMUM HEIGHT ILLUSTRATION T5 All Structures 4 stories T4 Dwellings 3 stories T4 Outbuildings & Structures 2 stories T3.2 All Structures 2 stories T3.1 All Structures 2 stories ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 154 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 44 ooooffff 99994444 5.6.2. Story Measurement a. Building height is measured in stories above sidewalk grade. b. Below ground stories do not count toward building height provided they do not extend more than 4 feet above sidewalk grade. (C, per Table 5.5-1) c. Uninhabited roofs, chimneys, cupolas, antennae, vents, elevator bulkheads, stair housings, and other uninhabited accessory elements do not count toward building height. (D, per Table 5.5-1) d. Mezzanines exceeding 40% of the floor area of a tenant space or residential unit, count toward building height as additional stories. 5.6.3. Story Height a. Above ground stories are limited in height as specified in Table 5.5-2. and as follows: i. Story height is measured from finished floor to finished ceiling. ii. Story height is measured at all points within the structure. iii. Where an above ground story exceeds the maximum story height it is counted as one or more stories by dividing the story height by the maximum story height, and rounding up. iv. Ceiling height in bathrooms, kitchens, closets, and other ancillary rooms may be lower than minimum story height. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..6666--2.STORY SSSTTTOOORRRYYY HHHHEEEEIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTT DISTRICT LEVEL TABLE 4.5-1 MINIMUM HEIGHT MAXIMUM HEIGHT T5 Ground Floor Non-Residential A 16 ft. 25 ft. T5 Ground Floor Residential A 10 ft. 16 ft. T5 Upper Stories B 10 ft. 14 ft. T4 Ground Floor A 10 ft. 14 ft. T4 Upper Stories B 8 ft. 12 ft. T3.2, T3.1 Ground Floor A 9 ft. 12 ft. T3.2, T3.1 Upper Stories B 8 ft. 10 ft. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 155 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 45 ooooffff 99994444 5.7. BUILDING OOOORRRRIIIIEEEENNNNTTTTAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNN 5.7.1. Lots with a single building, excluding accessory dwelling units and structures less than 600 sf in footprint, are subject to the following, as generally illustrated in Table 5.6-1(a): a. The principle building must be oriented parallel to the front property line or tangent to a curved front property line. b. The building must have a primary entry accessible from the sidewalk. 5.7.2. Lots with multiple buildings, excluding accessory dwelling units and structures less than 600 sf in footprint, are subject to the following, as generally illustrated in Table 5.6-1(b): a. The building closest to the front property line must be oriented parallel to the front property line or tangent to a curved front property line. b. The building is considered the primary building and must have a primary entry accessible from the sidewalk. c. Accessory dwelling units and structures less than 600 sf must be behind or beside the building relative to to the front property line. 5.7.3. Lots arranged as a cluster are subject to the following, as generally illustrated in Table 5.6- 1(c): a. Each dwelling unit must be oriented towards shared open space or along pedestrian paths. b. Each dwelling unit must have a primary entry accessible from shared open space or along a pedestrian path. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..7777--1. BBBBUUUUIIIILLLLDDDDIIIINNNNGGGG OOOORRRRIIIIEEEENNNNTTTTAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNN (a) Single building (b) Multiple buildings (c) Clusters ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 156 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 46 ooooffff 99994444 5.8. FRONTAGE 5.8.1. General a. Frontage requirements regulate the following: i. The yard space between front and side street lot lines and building facades nearest those lot lines, Frontage Yards; ii. Building facades nearest the front and side street lot lines, Frontage Facades; and iii. Elements projecting from building facades into frontages, Frontage Projections. b. The regulating plan may specify required frontage yard types, frontage projections types, and storefronts. 5.8.2. Frontage Assignment a. Primary and secondary frontages may be assigned on the regulating plan. b. Where primary and secondary frontages are not assigned on the regulating plan, they are assigned as follows: i. Primary frontages correspond with the lot line bearing the address. ii. Secondary frontages correspond with all side street lot lines. 5.8.3. Frontage Buildout a. Frontage buildout requirements apply to T4 and T5 districts only. b. Frontage buildout requires that a minimum length of frontages, primary or secondary, are lined with building facades situated between the minimum and maximum setbacks, as generally illustrated in Table 5.7-1. i. At corner lots, frontage buildout measurements exclude the building setback (a and b in Table 5.7-1) in the measurement of total frontage length. c. In T4, frontage buildout at primary frontages must be a minimum of 60%. d. In T5, frontage buildout at primary frontages must be a minimum of 80%. e. In T5, frontage buildout at secondary frontages must be a minimum of 50%. f. Properties facing onto Mountain Vista and Giddings are exempt from frontage buildout requirements. 5.8.4. Frontage Yards a. A frontage yard type must be selected from Table 5.7-2 and as follows: i. Urban and Shallow Yards must be 14 feet or less in depth. ii. Door Yards and Fenced Yards must be 12 feet or greater in depth. iii. Continuous Yards must be 16 feet or greater in depth. b. Frontage yards are subject to the requirements specified in Table 5.7-3 and as follows: i. Pedestrian Forecourts are limited to 2,500 square feet in area. ii. Cottage Court frontage yards must maintain a minimum of 30 feet in width between all structures and projections along the depth of the court. c. Cottage Court frontage yards have a minimum area of 1,800 square feet within the court, excluding the space between buildings and the public sidewalk. 5.8.5. Frontage Facades a. The primary building entry must be located along a frontage facade. b. Access to the primary building must be provided from the front property line. c. Glazing along frontage facades must meet the requirements specified in Table 5.7-4 and as follows: ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 157 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 47 ooooffff 99994444 i. Glazing is calculated on a per-story basis along the frontage facade. ii. Glazing is calculated as the percentage of the total area of glazing within a story divided by the total facade area of that story. iii. Window muntins and other glazing divisions less than 4 inches in width are considered glazed areas. 5.8.6. Frontage Projections a. Building features that project forward from frontage facades into front or side street setbacks are frontage projections. b. Frontage projections are limited as specified in Table 5.7-5 and as follows: i. Trim, cornices, eaves, plaques, mailboxes, bay and bow windows, storefront windows, and elements that are anchored to walls may project up to 4 feet. ii. Signs may project into frontages. iii. Additional requirements and projection allowances by type of frontage projection are specified in Table 5.7-6. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 158 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 48 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..8888--1.FRONTAGE FFFRRROOONNNTTTAAAGGGEEE BBBBUUUUIIIILLLLDDDDOOOOUUUUTTTT DISTRICT PERMITTED FRONTAGE YARD TYPES T5 T4 (a) Side street setback is excluded from the primary frontage length when determining frontage buildout. (b) Front setback is excluded from the secondary frontage length when determining frontage buildout. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..8888--2. PPPPEEEERRRRMMMMIIIITTTTTTTTEEEEDDDD FFFFRRRROOOONNNNTTTTAAAAGGGGEEEE YYYYAAAARRRRDDDD TTTTYYYYPPPPEEEESSSS DISTRICT PERMITTED FRONTAGE YARD TYPES T5 Urban, Pedestrian Forecourt, Shallow Yard, Door Yard T4 Shallow Yard, Cottage Court, Fenced Yard, Door Yard T3.2 Cottage Court, Fenced Yard, Continuous Yard T3.1 Cottage Court, Continuous Yard ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 159 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 49 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..8888--3.FFFFRRRROOOONNNNTTTTAAAAGGGGEEEE YARD YYYAAARRRDDD TTTTYYYYPPPPEEEE RRRREEEEQQQQUUUUIIIIRRRREEEEMMMMEEEENNNNTTTTSSSS YARD ILLUSTRATION REQUIREMENTS Urban Planting Permitted within raised containers, hanging planters and vertical garden features, block face must contain minimum 10% plantings in addition to public street trees Surface Must be paved and at sidewalk grade, should match sidewalk material Fencing Metal fencing permitted at outdoor seating areas only Pedestrian Forecourt Planting Optional, no minimum requirement. Surface Must be a minimum of 30% paved and at sidewalk grade Fencing Masonry walls permitted along the frontage facade line. Area 2,500 square feet, max. Activation Must be lined by habitable spaces Shallow Yard Planting All: Ornamental, Fastigiate, or Columnar trees at 20’-40’ spacing with a minimum lawn area of 55 sf. per tree, as permitted by adjacency to street trees. T4: 4 shrubs per 400 sf. min.; 50% min. planted surface. Surface Landscaped in T4, may be paved in T5 Walkways 1 per building entry Fencing Permitted ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 160 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 50 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..8888--3.FFFFRRRROOOONNNNTTTTAAAAGGGGEEEE YARD YYYAAARRRDDD TTTTYYYYPPPPEEEE RRRREEEEQQQQUUUUIIIIRRRREEEEMMMMEEEENNNNTTTTSSSS YARD ILLUSTRATION REQUIREMENTS Door Yard Planting & Surface All: Canopy shade trees at 30’-40’ spacing or Ornamental, Fastigiate, or Columnar trees at 20’- 40’ spacing, as permitted by adjacency to street trees. T4: 60% min. planted surface, 40% max. paved. T5: 30% min. planted surface, 70% max. paved. Walkways 1 per building entry Fencing Required Cottage Court Planting Canopy shade trees at 30’-40’ spacing, Coniferous evergreens or Ornamental trees at 20’-40’ spaces, as permitted by adjacent street trees. A minimum of 50% trees should be canopy shade trees. 60% min. planted surface. Surface Landscaped, programmed spaces optional. Walkways Required, connecting each building entry to sidewalks. Fencing Frontage fencing permitted at streets and to define yards for each unit. Fenced Yard Planting Canopy shade trees at 30’-40’ spacing, Coniferous evergreens or Ornamental, Fastigiate, or Columnar trees at 20’-40’ spaces, as permitted by adjacent street trees. A minimum of 50% trees should be canopy shade trees. 60% min. planted surface. Surface Landscaped, paving limited to walkways, driveways, and terraces Walkways 1 per building entry Fencing Required along front and side street property lines ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 161 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 51 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..8888--3.FFFFRRRROOOONNNNTTTTAAAAGGGGEEEE YARD YYYAAARRRDDD TTTTYYYYPPPPEEEE RRRREEEEQQQQUUUUIIIIRRRREEEEMMMMEEEENNNNTTTTSSSS YARD ILLUSTRATION REQUIREMENTS Continuous Yard Planting Canopy shade trees at 30’-40’ spacing, Coniferous evergreens or Ornamental trees at 20’-40’ spaces, as permitted by adjacent street trees. A minimum of 50% trees should be canopy shade trees. 70% min. planted surface. Surface Landscaped, paving limited to walkways, driveways, and terraces Walkways 1 per building entry Fencing Permitted at frontage facade lines, not permitted along front or side street property lines. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 162 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 52 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..8888--4.FRONTAGE FFFRRROOONNNTTTAAAGGGEEE FFFFAAAACCCCAAAADDDDEEEE GGGGLLLLAAAAZZZZIIIINNNNGGGG DISTRICT LEVEL MINIMUM GLAZING MAXIMUM GLAZING T5 Ground Floor 60% 90% Upper Stories 30% 60% T4 Ground Floor 30% 50% Upper Stories 30% 50% TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..8888--5. PPPPEEEERRRRMMMMIIIITTTTTTTTEEEEDDDD FFFFRRRROOOONNNNTTTTAAAAGGGGEEEE PPPPRRRROOOOJJJJEEEECCCCTTTTIIIIOOOONNNNSSSS DISTRICT ELEMENT MAXIMUM DEPTH T5 Arcades 100% of setback Galleries 100% of setback Canopies & Marquees 100% of setback Awnings 100% of setback T4 Enclosed Porch Up to 8 feet excluding steps Open Porch Up to 8 feet excluding steps Stoop Up to 5 feet excluding steps Terrace 100% of setback T3.2 Enclosed Porch Up to 8 feet excluding steps Open Porch Up to 8 feet excluding steps Stoop Up to 5 feet excluding steps T3.1 Enclosed Porch Up to 8 feet excluding steps Open Porch Up to 8 feet excluding steps Stoop Up to 5 feet excluding steps ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 163 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 53 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..8888--6.FRONTAGE FFFRRROOONNNTTTAAAGGGEEE PPPPRRRROOOOJJJJEEEECCCCTTTTIIIIOOOONNNNSSSS RRRREEEEQQQQUUUUIIIIRRRREEEEMMMMEEEENNNNTTTTSSSS PROJECTION REQUIREMENTS Arcades Depth 10 ft. min., to within 2 feet of curbs Width 80% of facade width, min. Material Masonry or metal Galleries Depth 8 ft. min., to within 2 feet of curbs Width 20 ft. min. Material Metal or wood Canopies & Marquees Depth 6 ft. min., to within 2 feet of curbs Width Shopfront bay width (min), 20 ft. min. Material Metal; wood ceiling permitted Awnings Depth 6 ft. min., to within 2 feet of curbs Width Per Section 4.7 Material Fabric or canvas over metal structure Enclosed Porches Depth 4 ft. min. Width 12 ft. min. Vertical Material Wood & glazing Railing Material Wood infill panels Floor Material Wood or Masonry Open Porches Depth 6 ft. min. Width 12 ft. min. Vertical Material Wood Railing Material Wood Floor Material Wood or Masonry Stoops Depth 4 ft. min. Width 4 ft. min. Vertical Material Wood or Masonry Railing Material Metal or Masonry Floor Material Masonry ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 164 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 54 ooooffff 99994444 5.9. SHOPFRONTS 5.9.1. All ground floor commercial uses must have shopfronts. 5.9.2. Shopfronts must occupy a minimum percentage of ground floor tenant facades as follows: a. Tenant spaces 50 feet or less in width require shopfronts across 100% of the tenant facade; b. Tenant spaces between 50 and 100 feet in width require shopfronts across a minimum of 70% of the tenant facade, not less than 50 feet total; c. Tenant spaces over 100 feet in width require shopfronts across a minimum of 50% of the tenant facade. 5.9.3. Shopfronts should be designed with the following elements: a. A bulkhead, between the sidewalk and 18 to 30 inches above the sidewalk; b. Shopfront display windows, between bulkheads and transoms, meeting the following standards: i. Glazing must be clear; ii. Reflective, tinted, and low-e glazing are not permitted; iii. Display windows may project forward of the facade up to 3 feet. c. Transom windows, between shopfront display windows and the signage band, meeting the following standards: i. Glazing should match shopfront window glazing; ii. Transom windows should be a minimum of 18 inches in height; iii. Transom windows should have dividing muntins; iv. Transom windows should be free of signage. d. A signage band to accommodate band signs above transom windows, between 18 and 30 inches in height. e. A transition band, terminating the shopfront by delineating the space between ground floor commercial uses and upper story uses. i. Gooseneck lighting is recommended, located within the transition band to illuminate band signs. f. Roll-up windows may take the place of shopfront display windows and bulkheads. 5.9.4. Shopfronts entries should meet the following standards: a. Entry doors should be recessed from the sidewalk where required to accommodate outward door swings. b. Walls providing entry door recesses should be glazed to match shopfront display windows. c. Entry doors should be a minimum of 8 feet in height. d. The business address should be advertised with a window sign on the transom above the entry door. 5.9.5. Shopfront awnings should meet the following standards: a. Awnings should be installed between shopfront windows and transom windows. b. Awnings may be fixed or retractable. c. Awnings should span the entire width of the shopfront or be installed with minimal breaks for pilasters between windows. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 165 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 55 ooooffff 99994444 5.10. FENCING AND WALLS 5.10.1. Fencing and walls within frontage yards is limited as specified in Table 5.7-3. 5.10.2. T2 and related support operations are exempt from this section. 5.10.3. The following fencing is prohibited: a. Electric, barbed wire, razor wire, hog wire, rolled wire, or other types of hazardous fencing; b. Chain link fencings; c. Any wire smaller in size than 12 gauge. 5.10.4. Fence and wall height is limited as specified in Table 5.9-1 and as follows (see Table 5.9-3 for terminology): a. Frontage fencing and wall must be located as follows: i. Fencing and walls must be a minimum of 4 inches from public sidewalks in all instances. ii. Fencing and walls must be within 3 feet of frontage lines. iii. Fencing and walls over 3 feet in height must be set back from the street-side edge of sidewalks at least 2 feet plus the minimum sidewalk width specified in LCUASS for the street type designation. iv. Where the desired appearance is fencing and walls with zero setback from sidewalks, a sidewalk extension may be provided on the private lot, in which case a control joint is required to separate the public and private sidewalks. b. Fencing and walls along side and rear property lines is considered frontage fencing and walls. 5.10.5. Fence and wall materials are limited as specified in Table 5.9-2. a. Metal and iron fencing must be black. b. Masonry walls may be combined with decorative metal or wrought iron with the masonry portion below and optionally forming pillars. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..11110000--1.MAXIMUM MMMAAAXXXIIIMMMUUUMMM FFFFEEEENNNNCCCCEEEE AAAANNNNDDDD WWWWAAAALLLLLLLL HHHHEEEEIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTT DISTRICT FRONTAGE FENCING FRONTAGE FACADE SIDE REAR REAR ALLEY T5 4 ft. at seating areas 8 ft. 8 ft. 8 ft. 8 ft. T4 4 ft. 6 ft. 6 ft. 6 ft. 6 ft. T3.2 4 ft. 6 ft. 6 ft. 6 ft. 6 ft. T3.1 n/a 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 4 ft. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 166 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 56 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..11110000--2. FFFFEEEENNNNCCCCEEEE AAAANNNNDDDD WWWWAAAALLLLLLLL MMMMAAAATTTTEEEERRRRIIIIAAAALLLLSSSS DISTRICT MASONRY DECORATIVE METAL OR WROUGHT IRON WOOD T5 Permitted; Stain or stucco required. Permitted; 70% opaque max. Prohibited T4 Permitted; Stain or stucco required. Permitted; 40% opaque max. Permitted; Paint required. T3.2 Prohibited Permitted Permitted; Paint or stain required. T3.1 Prohibited Prohibited Permitted TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..11110000--3.FENCING FFFEEENNNCCCIIINNNGGG TTTTEEEERRRRMMMMIIIINNNNOOOOLLLLOOOOGGGGYYYY Frontage Fencing Frontage Facade Fencing Side Fencing Rear Fencing ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 167 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 57 ooooffff 99994444 5.11. ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS 5.11.1. Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) are permitted where specified in Chapter 2. Use. 5.11.2. ADUs may be provided in the following locations: a. Within the primary dwelling structure; b. Above a free-standing garage; c. As an independent, free-standing outbuilding. 5.11.3. ADUs are limited to a maximum area of 800 square feet. 5.11.4. ADUs must have an entry independent of the primary dwelling, accessible from a sidewalk or from a rear alley. 5.12. EXTERIOR LLLLIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTTIIIINNNNGGGG 5.12.1. General a. Fluorescent and compact fluorescent lights are prohibited on the exterior of structures, including within open porches and stoops. b. Exterior lights should have a color temperature below 3,200 kelvin. c. Exterior lighting must include controls to automatically extinguish lighting when sufficient daylight is available. d. Exterior lighting should include controls to automatically lower lighting lumens by 30% or more after 10 pm, except in the following conditions: i. In T5; ii. Landscape lighting; iii. Where a single exterior luminaire is provided such as at residential front doors; and iv. Motion activated lighting. 5.12.2. Uplighting Restricted a. Lighting must be angled or shielded to limit vertical projection of light beyond 90 degrees and as follows: i. Signage lighting may be specifically permitted to be angled upwards as specified in Chapter 7; ii. Uplighting is limited in total lumens per fixture and maximum overall foot-candles projected above 90-degrees as specified in Table 5.11-1; iii. Unshielded luminaires are further restricted in intensity as specified in Table 5.11- 3. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..12222-1 -1.MAXIMUM MMMAAAXXXIIIMMMUUUMMM UUUUPPPPLLLLIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTTIIIINNNNGGGG DISTRICT MAXIMUM LUMENS MAXIMUM FC T5 1,000 lumens 0.8 FC T4 100 lumens 0.3 FC T3 20 lumens 0.1 FC ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 168 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 58 ooooffff 99994444 5.12.3. Non-residential and Mixed-use Lighting Limits a. Total site lighting for non-residential and mixed-use properties is limited to a maximum lumens per exterior hardscape area as specified in Table 5.11-12. i. Shopfront and signage lighting is excluded from total site lighting limits. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..12222-1 -2.TOTAL TTTOOOTTTAAALLL SSSSIIIITTTTEEEE LLLLIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTTIIIINNNNGGGG DISTRICT MAXIMUM LUMENS T5 5.0 lumens per sf of hardscape T4 2.5 lumens per sf of hardscape b. Additional lumens are permitted in the following amounts and conditions: i. Drive-through windows are permitted 8,000 lumens per window, within 20 feet of the window; ii. Gas stations are permitted 16,000 lumens per fuel pump to achieve an average 20 foot-candles. 5.12.4. Residential Lighting Limits a. Light intensity is limited by total lumens per luminaire as specified in Table 5.11-3. b. Exterior lighting must not project or reflect light upward or onto a neighboring property. c. Directional fixtures such as exterior entryway lighting, floodlights, and spotlights, must be shielded, installed, and aimed so that they do not project light into the windows of neighboring residences. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 5555..12222-1 -3.MAXIMUM MMMAAAXXXIIIMMMUUUMMM LLLLIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTTIIIINNNNGGGG LIGHT TYPE T5 T4 T3 Primary Entry, unshielded luminaires 630 lumens 630 lumens 420 lumens Other unshielded luminaires 315 lumens 315 lumens 315 lumens Fully shielded luminaires 1,260 lumens 1,260 lumens 1,260 lumens Landscape lighting 2,100 lumens 1,050 lumens Not permitted Low voltage landscape lighting 525 lumens 525 lumens Not permitted Directional or flood lighting 2,100 lumens 1,260 lumens Not permitted 5.13. JUSTFICATION FOR MMMMOOOODDDDIIIIFFFFIIIICCCCAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNNSSSS OOOOFFFF LOTS AAAANNNNDDDD BUILDING STANDARDS 5.13.1. As required by LUC Sections 4.29(G)(b) and (c), following is an in-depth explanation of how the modified development standards for Lots and Buildings advance and are necessary for the achievement of the development objectives of Montava. Standards for lots and buildings encompass the majority of design and development standards for Montava. These are written to ensure a very predictable development outcome among a variety of buildings and over a long development horizon. Primarily these standards are concerned with where buildings are located on each lot, where parking is located, the orientation of the building, the design of building facades, and the design of the space between building facades and sidewalks. Many of these requirements exist in the LUC, ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 169 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 59 ooooffff 99994444 however they are either not determinant of character, or they anticipate a single character of neighborhood space, concerned primarily with use, not character. While the use of property and buildings is a concern of Montava’s development standards, this concern is secondary to the character of the transect district. This approach to development regulation is commonly referred to a form-based coding, where the form of buildings is of primary concern and the use of secondary concern. Montava’s standards coordinate the elements of the built environment within each transect district, creating a series of environments with different characters, from very urban to natural. Creating a variety of characters, a diversity of feeling, is necessary across a site as large as Montava. The variety of overall district character is important in providing prospective residents with options to fit their personal preferences, and residents and neighbors with the ability to walk into areas that feel different from where their house is located. When coordinated carefully with the affected transect district, the character of each transect district also assists in navigating the community. People intuit the relationship between an increase in character intensity and the location of commercial districts. Similarly they intuit the relationship between a decrease in character intensity and the location of natural areas. Montava’s design intent seeks to create a variety of different character experiences throughout the community. 5.13.2. Lot Size Lot size standards set minimum and maximum thresholds based on the width and depth of lots, and maximum lot areas in mixed-use districts where large lots with multiple buildings are more prevalent. The lot size standards affect the character of the district by influencing the size of buildings and spacing between buildings. Housing in T3.1 consists of larger buildings on larger lots than T3.2. Housing and other uses in T4 typically consist of smaller buildings that are taller as a result. In T5, there are allowances for shallow lots to accommodate liner buildings. 5.13.3. Lot Occupation and Lot Coverage Overall district feel is significantly affected by how much of a lot is taken up by buildings and covered structures and impervious surfaces. In T5, buildings may take up nearly their entire lot, which is likely to be fully paved in unbuilt areas. This reflects a condition like downtown. However, in T3.1, a significant portion of each lot should be unbuilt and left pervious, relating to the adjacent natural areas. T3.2 and T4 areas are steps in-between, where buildings and impervious surfaces occupy an increasing portion of their lots. 5.13.4. Building Setbacks The distance that buildings are set back from sidewalks and from each other is a key component affecting community character. In T5, buildings are set very close to sidewalks, creating a main street or downtown district character. In T3.1, buildings are set much further back from sidewalks and further from each other, signaling adjacency to natural areas. T3.2 and T4 areas are steps in-between, where buildings are located closer to each other and the street, and where buildings can begin to be attached 5.13.5. Building Height Building height variety across the community is important to signal the location of more intense and less intense character and activity. In T5, buildings should be taller, while in T3 they should be shorter, with T4 in between. The heights in Montava’s development standards are in line with the LUC’s three mixed-use district intensities, organized by transect rather than by neighborhood. In Montava, each neighborhood is constructed of ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 170 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 60 ooooffff 99994444 multiple transect districts, which results in significant local variety and diversity across the site. 5.13.6. Building Orientation Building should generally be oriented parallel to their front lot line, and tangent to a lot line that is curved. This simple rule is important to ensure buildings face onto sidewalks and support active streets. An exception is provided for housing that faces onto shared green spaces, a feature used throughout Montava, where the green space may technically be located at a side lot line. 5.13.7. Housing Model Variety Montava’s use of the transect and neighborhood design based upon a mix of multiple transects and districts achieves the goals of housing model variety requirements. Additionally, the Montava design review process will work with builders to orchestrate the design of each street. However in many cases, such as townhouses and small cottages on shared greens, a series of the same housing model is likely to located in a row. The design review process will ensure that meaningful facade variation is provided in such cases. Where lots are narrow, modifications to housing models don’t create any meaningful differences along the street facade. The combination between transect districts and design review will ensure diversity and variety of character. 5.13.8. Building and Lot Frontages Control of building and lot frontages is one of the most critical aspects affecting the design intent of Montava. Like other development standards, frontage standards are varied according to the transect, which also coordinates frontage requirements with lot size, building height, and building setback. Montava’s frontage requirements encompass a number of building design standards throughout the LUC. Frontage standards regulate the design of the entire space between the sidewalk and building facades, including facade projections, landscaping and hardscape, fencing, frontage occupation, facade glazing, and special conditions such as forecourts, door yards, and cottage courts. Facade projection standards include requirements for porches, stoops, galleries, arcades, and shopfronts. In T5, frontages are generally paved without fencing or walls, permitting access to shopfronts and common building entries. Buildings are required to provide shopfronts for each tenant space and along a minimum percentage of facade length, restricting blank walls. In T3, frontages are landscaped with trees, and may include fencing. Each standard is coordinated to create a predictable character for the district. 5.13.9. Yards Yards are controlled by a combination of frontage standards and lot occupation and coverage standards. Frontage standards control the frontage yard, which is yard space located between building facades and sidewalks. Lot occupation and coverage standards ensure that yard space is provided in T3 and T4, and that it is landscaped commensurate with the intensity of the district. 5.13.10. Shopfront Design Shopfront design guidelines are included in Montava’s development standards, encouraging facade design in the town center to follow well established rules including the use of clear glass, the division of facades, and providing for appropriate locations for signage. Poor shopfront design can lead to the degradation of main street vitality. However, shopfront design is evolving, and the standards are specifically written as guidelines to provide room for innovation. 5.13.11. Fencing and Walls The design, materials, and height of fencing and walls significantly influences district character. Like many others, this set of design standards varies by Transect district. In T5, fencing is not permitted along streets, however fencing along parking lots and between properties should be tall and masonry or metal. In T3, fencing should be primarily wood, low ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 171 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 5:LLLLoooottttssss aaaannnndddd Buildings 61 ooooffff 99994444 along frontages and sufficiently tall for privacy between properties. Fencing and wall standards are coordinated with frontage standards. 5.13.12. Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory dwelling unit (ADU) standards are necessary to ensure ADUs are limited in size and designed in coordination with the primary building. 5.13.13. Solar Orientation Development standards affecting solar orientation are located between site and building standards and architectural character standards. These account for the primarily southwest to northeast orientation of streets in Montava, aligned with Long’s Peak. Sufficient solar PV access is achieved through the design of roofs, capturing SE and SW light. Rooftop design must account for different types of housing, such as townhouses that slope towards the front of the lot and small single family housing which slope towards the side of the lot. In all cases, lot orientation provides for SE and SW exposure. Solar standards require that those roof portions with best exposure be designed to accommodate PV systems, including the location of plumbing vents and other roof penetrations. Standards also require that exposure be considered in the design of floor plans, to maximize light access into dwellings. In addition to solar orientation and PV access, Montava will be built to Net Zero Ready Home standards, reducing the amount of PV necessary to achieve net zero. 5.13.14. Exterior Lighting Site and exterior light development standards are designed to implement International Dark- Sky Association (IDA) recommendations across the community. IDA’s model ordinance provides for a series of standards coordinated with the intensity of development. This system integrates directly with the Transect, where T3 implements LZ1, T4 implements LZ2, and T5 implements LZ3. The exterior light standards are derived from the model ordinance, coordinated with the Transect. This ensures that each district in Montava plays its part in protecting dark skies, as is appropriate to the intensity of use and development. Montava’s design in coordination with exterior light standards contributes to light protection in natural areas by locating T5 / LZ3 far from natural areas and transitioning in development and light zone intensity down to T3 / LZ1 adjacent to natural areas, as envisioned by IDA recommendations. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 172 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 6:Parking 62 ooooffff 99994444 6. PARKING 6.1. OVERVIEWWWW OVERVIE 6.1.1. The development standards of this Section 6 for Parking shall apply to all development in the Montava PUD Master Plan. Such development standards modify all LUC standards in Article 3 and Divisions 4.5, 4.27 and 4.28 thereof which regulate parking, with the exception of Division 3.8, Supplemental Regulations, which are the subject of Chapter 12. 6.2. VEHICULAR PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG LLLLOOOOCCCCAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNN AAAANNNNDDDD ACCESS:T3.1 6.2.1. Driveways a. Driveways are limited as follows: i. Driveway width is limited to a maximum of 12 feet; ii. Driveways accessing multiple garage doors may be up to width of the garage within 20 feet of the garage doors; b. Driveways may have a single point of access or two points of access in a loop. c. Lots with side street lot lines should provide parking access from that lot line. d. Lots with alley access must provide parking access from the alley. 6.2.2. Carports and Covered Parking a. Carports and covered parking are permitted. 6.2.3. Garages a. Individual garage doors are limited to a maximum width of 10 feet. b. Garages must be configured in one of the following orientations, as generally illustrated in Table 6.1-1: i. Type 1: Independent of the dwelling. ii. Type 2: Front-entry, subservient to the dwelling facade. iii. Type 3: Side-entry, within the main dwelling volume. iv. Type 4: Side-entry, forward of the main dwelling volume. c. Type 1 garages are subject to the following requirements: i. The garage must be detached from the dwelling a minimum of 10 feet. ii. Where the garage is closer to the front property line than the dwelling: (1) Vehicular entry movement must be parallel with the front property line. (2) A minimum of one window must be installed on the garage facade, facing the front property line. d. Type 2 garages are subject to the following requirements: i. The garage must be set back a minimum of 10 feet from the principal dwelling facade, excluding projections. e. Type 3 garages are subject to the following requirements: i. The garage should be set towards the rear of the main dwelling volume. ii. The garage may not extend forward of the main dwelling volume. iii. Where the garage is located parallel with the dwelling front facade, a minimum of one window must be installed on the garage facade, facing the front property line. f. Type 4 garages are subject to the following requirements: i. Vehicular entry to the garage must be parallel with the front property line. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 173 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 6:Parking 63 ooooffff 99994444 ii. A minimum of one window must be installed on the garage facade, facing the front property line. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 6666..2222--1.GGGGAAAARRRRAAAAGGGGEEEE TYPES TTTYYYPPPEEESSS AAAANNNNDDDD OOOORRRRIIIIEEEENNNNTTTTAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNN TYPE 1: FREESTANDING, REAR TYPE 1: FREESTANDING, FRONT TYPE 2: ATTACHED, FRONT ENTRY TYPE 3: ATTACHED, SIDE ENTRY TYPE 4: ATTACHED, FORWARD OF HOUSE ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 174 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 6:Parking 64 ooooffff 99994444 6.3. VEHICULAR PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG LLLLOOOOCCCCAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNN AAAANNNNDDDD ACCESS:T3.2 AAAANNNNDDDD T4 6.3.1. On-street parking spaces located along lot lines count towards minimum required parking. 6.3.2. Off-street parking may be provided individually or clustered within the same block. 6.3.3. Driveways are limited as follows: a. Driveways providing parking access to 4 or fewer units are limited to a maximum of 12 feet in width. b. Driveways providing parking access to more than 4 units are limited to a maximum of 22 feet in width. 6.3.4. Garages within the front half of a lot are limited to a maximum width of 30% of the lot width. 6.3.5. Carports and covered parking are permitted in off-street parking areas and must be located behind buildings relative to front lot lines. 6.3.6. Parking access is permitted as follows: a. Where alleys abut any property line for individual or clustered properties, on-site parking must be accessed from an alley. b. Lots or clustered properties without alley access with any side street lot lines must access parking from a side street lot line. c. Lots without alley access or side street lot lines may access parking from the front lot line, limited to one access point adjacent to a side lot line. d. Clustered properties without alley access or side street lot lines may access parking from the front lot line, limited to two access points, each along a side lot line. 6.3.7. Off-street parking must be located behind buildings relative to the front lot line. 6.3.8. Off-street parking serving clustered properties must be located as follows: a. Parking must be a minimum of 10 feet behind the facade of the nearest building to front and side street lot lines. b. Parking must be shielded from front and side street lot lines by buildings or frontage facade fencing. 6.4. VEHICULAR PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG LLLLOOOOCCCCAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNN AAAANNNNDDDD ACCESS:T5 6.4.1. Minimum required parking may be provided as follows: a. Leased from the Metro District, on-street or in shared parking lots, within 800 feet of the use; b. Provided on-site independent of the Metro District; c. Both leased from the parking district and provided on-site. 6.4.2. Off-street parking must be located behind buildings relative to front lot lines. 6.4.3. Off-street surface parking adjacent to side street lot lines must be lined or screened as follows: a. One or more liner buildings should be located along the sidewalk as generally illustrated in Table 6.3-1(a); b. In the case that liner buildings are not feasible, parking must be screened with a street screen as generally illustrated in Table 6.3-1(b) and as follows: i. The street screen must meet the fencing standards for T5; ii. The street screen may be interrupted for pedestrian and vehicular access. 6.4.4. Off-street structured parking must be lined or screened as follows: ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 175 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 6:Parking 65 ooooffff 99994444 a. One or more liner buildings, a minimum of 30 feet in depth, should be located along the sidewalk as generally illustrated in Table 6.3-1(d); b. In the case that liner buildings are not feasible, parking must be screened as generally illustrated in Table 6.3-1(c) and as follows: i. The ground floor of the parking structure must include habitable spaces along sidewalks; ii. Ground floor habitable spaces may be interrupted for pedestrian and vehicular access; iii. Ground floor habitable spaces must be designed with shopfronts; iv. Openings above the ground floor must meet the window proportion and minimum glazing requirements. Openings count towards minimum glazing. c. Along designated main streets, structured parking must be lined. 6.4.5. Adjacent lots providing off-street parking and district managed parking lots must be supplied with vehicular and pedestrian connections to any on-site parking areas. 6.4.6. Carports and covered parking are permitted in off-street parking areas. 6.4.7. Along side street lot lines, parking must be shielded by buildings or frontage facade fencing. 6.4.8. Parking access is permitted as follows: a. Where alleys abut any property line, access to on-site parking must be provided from the alley. b. Lots with side street lot lines may provide one access point from each side street lot line. c. Lots without alley or side street lot line access may provide one access point from the front property line. d. Where more than one access point is required for circulation, access points should be located along different property lines. 6.4.9. Driveways are limited to a maximum of 22 feet in width. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 176 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 6:Parking 66 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 6666..4444--1.LLLLIIIINNNNEEEEDDDD AND AAANNNDDD SSSSCCCCRRRREEEEEEEENNNNEEEEDDDD PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG (a) Screened Surface Parking (b) Lined Surface Parking (c) Screened Structured Parking (d) Lined Structured Parking 6.5. REQUIRED VVVVEEEEHHHHIIIICCCCUUUULLLLAAAARRRR PARKING 6.5.1. Parking is required for each residential dwelling unit in the amounts specified in Table 6.4- 1. a. Multi-family residential parking provided on site may not exceed 200% of the minimum parking requirement, excluding on-street parking spaces. 6.5.2. Parking is required for each non-residential use in the amounts specified in Table 6.4-2. 6.5.3. Parking for assembly uses, schools, and libraries is required in the amounts specified in the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code. 6.5.4. Shared parking provided by the Metro District may exceed maximum parking ratios to provide for future uses and events. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 6666..5555--1: MMMMIIIINNNNIIIIMMMMUUUUMMMM RRRREEEESSSSIIIIDDDDEEEENNNNTTTTIIIIAAAALLLL PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG USE T5 T4 T3.2 T3.1 Single Family Detached n/a 1.5 / du 2 / du 2 / du Single Family Attached 1 / du 1.5 / du 2 / du n/a Accessory Dwelling Units 0.5 / du 1 / du 1 / du n/a Multi-Family 0.75 / du 1 / du 1.5 / du n/a Affordable Housing 0.5 / du 0.75 / du 1 / du 1.5 / du ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 177 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 6:Parking 67 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 6666..5555--2:NON NNNOOONNN--RRRREEEESSSSIIIIDDDDEEEENNNNTTTTIIIIAAAALLLL PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG USE MINIMUM MAXIMUM Restaurant / Bar 5 / 1000 sf 10 / 1000 sf General Commercial 2 / 1000 sf 4 / 1000 sf Office 1 / 1000 sf 4 / 1000 sf Light Industry, Workshop 1 / 1000 sf 4 / 1000 sf Industrial 0.5 per employee n/a Lodging 0.5 per key 1 per key 6.6. REQUIRED VVVVEEEEHHHHIIIICCCCUUUULLLLAAAARRRR PARKING ADJUSTMENTS 6.6.1. Transit Oriented District a. Transit oriented district parking reductions specified in the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code continue to apply to uses within Transit Oriented Districts. 6.6.2. Parking Studies a. An applicant may elect to commission a parking study, providing evidence of parking requirements above or below the standards of this Chapter. b. Parking study methodology must comply with the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code. 6.6.3. Shared Parking a. Shared parking may be used to adjust down the number of required parking spaces within a single site or within the parking district. b. Within a single site, shared parking may only be applied to uses within the site. c. Within the parking district, shared parking is limited as follows: i. Shared parking is calculated collectively for all shared parking lot uses; ii. Uses must be within 800 feet of the shared parking lot; iii. On-street parking spaces included within the shared parking district are limited to those located along the block-face of uses accounted for in shared parking calculations. d. Shared parking reductions are calculated using Table 6.5-1 and as follows: i. A sample shared parking calculation is provided in Table 6.5-2; ii. The number of required spaces for each use as determined in Section 5.4 is entered into the yellow column; iii. For each use and time of day, the number of required parking spaces is multiplied by the occupancy rate listed, entered into the red columns; iv. Each column is summed vertically in the green row; v. The adjusted minimum required parking spaces is the highest result within the green row. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 178 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 6:Parking 68 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 6666..6666--1:SSSSHHHHAAAARRRREEEEDDDD PARKING PPPAAARRRKKKIIINNNGGG RRRREEEEDDDDUUUUCCCCTTTTIIIIOOOONNNNSSSS USE USING SHARED PARKING MIN. SPACES MON-FRI 8AM-6PM MON-FRI 6PM-12AM MON-FRI 12AM-8AM SAT-SUN 8AM-6PM SAT-SUN 6PM-12AM SAT-SUN 12AM-8AM Residential sp 60% sp*.6 100% sp 100% sp 80% sp*.8 100% sp 100% sp Lodging sp 70% sp*.7 100% sp 100% sp 70% sp*.7 100% sp 100% sp Restaurant / Bar sp 70% sp*.7 100% sp 10% sp*.1 70% sp*.7 100% Sp 20% sp*.02 Retail sp 90% sp*.9 80% sp*.8 5% sp*.05 100% sp 70% sp*.7 5% sp*.05 Office, Industrial sp 100% sp 20% sp*.2 5% sp*.05 5% sp*.05 5% sp*.05 5% sp*.05 Assembly sp 40% sp*.4 100% sp 10% sp*.1 80% sp*.8 50% sp*.5 50% sp*.5 Religious sp 10% sp*.1 5% sp*.05 5% sp*.05 100% sp 5% sp*.05 5% sp*.05 Required: sum sum sum sum sum sum sum TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 6.6666--2:CCCCOOOOMMMMPPPPLLLLEEEETTTTEEEEDDDD SSSSHHHHAAAARRRREEEEDDDD PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE USE USING SHARED PARKING MIN. SPACES MON-FRI 8AM-6PM MON-FRI 6PM-12AM MON-FRI 12AM-8AM SAT-SUN 8AM-6PM SAT-SUN 6PM-12AM SAT-SUN 12AM-8AM Residential 120 sp 60% 72 100% 120 100% 120 80% 96 100% 120 100% 120 Lodging 70% 0 100% 0 100% 0 70% 0 100% 0 100% 0 Restaurant / Bar 55 sp 70% 39 100% 55 10% 6 70% 39 100% 55 20% 11 Retail 45 sp 90% 41 80% 36 5% 3 100% 45 70% 32 5% 3 Office, Industrial 80 sp 100% 80 20% 16 5% 4 5% 4 5% 4 5% 4 Assembly 40% 0 100% 0 10% 0 80% 0 50% 0 50% 0 Religious 10% 0 5% 0 5% 0 100% 0 5% 0 5% 0 Required: 300 sp 232 ssssppppaaaacccceeeessss 227 spaces 133 spaces 184 spaces 211 spaces 138 spaces Shared parking reduces the initial required of 300 spaces by 68 spaces to 232 total spaces required. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 179 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 6:Parking 69 ooooffff 99994444 6.7. VEHICULAR PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG LLLLOOOOTTTT DESIGN 6.7.1. Parking lots must have a minimum vertical clearance of 7 feet and 15 feet where the facility is to be used by trucks or for loading or along a garbage collection path. 6.7.2. Compact stalls may account for up to 40% of off-street spaces in each parking lot. 6.7.3. Drive aisles must meet the minimum size requirements as specified in Table 6.6-1. 6.7.4. Parking stalls must meet the minimum size requirements as specified in Table 6.6-2. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 6666..7777--1.DRIVE DDDRRRIIIVVVEEE AAAAIIIISSSSLLLLEEEE MMMMIIIINNNNIIIIMMMMUUUUMMMM SSSSIIIIZZZZEEEESSSS PARKING ANGLE AISLE: ONE-WAY SINGLE LOADED AISLE: ONE-WAY DOUBLE LOADED AISLE: TWO WAY, DOUBLE LOADED 90 deg. 23 ft. min. 23 ft. min. 23 ft. min. 60 deg. 12.8 ft. min. 11.8. ft. min. 19.3 ft. min. 45 deg. 10.8 ft. min. 9.5 ft. min. 18.5 ft. min. Parallel 10 ft. min. 12 ft. min. 20 ft. min. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 6666..7777--2.PARKING PPPAAARRRKKKIIINNNGGG SSSSTTTTAAAALLLLLLLL MMMMIIIINNNNIIIIMMMMUUUUMMMM SSSSIIIIZZZZEEEESSSS STALL TYPE STALL WIDTH STALL LENGTH Standard Stall 8.5 ft. min. 18 ft. min. Compact Stall 8 ft. min. 15 ft. min. Parallel Stall 7 ft. min. 22 ft. min. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 180 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 6:Parking 70 ooooffff 99994444 6.8. VVVVEHICULAR EHICULAR PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG LLLLOOOOTTTT LANDSCAPING 6.8.1. Parking lot landscaping is required as specified in Chapter 7: Private Lot Landscaping. 6.9. BICYCLE PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG LOCATION AAAANNNNDDDD ACCESS: TTTT5555 6.9.1. On-street bicycle parking spaces and bicycle parking in parking district shared parking lots may be provided by the Metro District. Allocation of shared spaces towards individual requirements is determined by the Metro District. 6.9.2. Minimum required bicycle parking may be provided as follows: a. Provided by the parking district, on-street or in shared parking lots within 400 feet of the use; b. Provided on-site independent of the parking district; c. Both provided from the parking district and on-site. 6.9.3. Off-street bicycle parking must be located within buildings or behind or to the side of buildings relative to front lot lines. 6.10. REQUIRED BICYCLE PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG 6.10.1. Bicycle parking is required in the amounts specified in Table 6.9-1, and as follows: a. A minimum percentage of spaces must be enclosed for each use; b. Enclosed spaces for multi-family residential must be located: i. In a common area on the ground floor; ii. In the ground floor of a separate structure on the same site; iii. In the ground floor of an attached structure. c. A maximum percentage of spaces may be located on-street for each use. TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 6666..11110000--1. BBBBIIIICCCCYYYYCCCCLLLLEEEE PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG USE MINIMUM SPACES ENCLOSED ON-STREET SPACES Multi-family Residential 1 per bedroom 40% min. 0% max. Restaurant / Bar 1 / 1,000 sf 0% min. 100% max. General Commercial 1 / 4,000 sf 0% min. 100% max. Office 1 / 4,000 sf 20% min. 80% max. Light Industry / Workshop 4 0% min. 100% max. Industrial 4 0% min. 100% max. Lodging 1 per 4 keys 60% min. 40% max. Education & Assembly 1 / 3,000 sf 0% min. 100% max. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 181 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 6:Parking 71 ooooffff 99994444 6.11. JUSTIFICATION FFFFOOOORRRR MODIFICATIONS OF PPPPAAAARRRRKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG STANDARDS 6.11.1. As required by LUC Sections 4.29(G)(b) and (c), following is an in-depth explanation of how the modified development standards for Parking advance and are necessary for the achievement of the development objectives of Montava. 6.11.2. Parking standards modifications are necessary for Montava because the ownership model and proximity of building uses in Montava are unique, in particular within the Town Center. In the lower intensity areas, Montava's parking standards are similar to the LUC, with a few supplemental standards concerning garage orientation, access to parking, and driveway size limitations. Within the Town Center, Montava’s design is based upon District-managed shared parking - for both cars and bikes - in lots and on-street parking. Rather than providing parking on an individual basis for each building or use, that parking is leased through the District. As a result the district can benefit from shared parking, using a park- once strategy. Being a mixed-use Town Center, individual properties may also benefit from shared parking if they choose to provide their own parking rather than working with the District. The shared parking strategy requires a different approach to parking requirements where shared parking is the rule rather than the exception. Each land use requires a minimum number of parking spaces as is typical. Shared parking is then a calculation applied across users of a shared parking lot, eliminating space requirements where the peak usage time differs between nearby land uses, such as housing and office. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 182 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 7:Private Lot LLLLaaaannnnddddssssccccaaaappppiiiinnnngggg 72 ooooffff 99994444 7. PRIVATE LOT LANDSCAPING 7.1. OVERVIEW 7.1.1. The development standards of LUC Section 3.2.1 shall apply to development in the Montava PUD Master Plan except as modified in this Chapter. 7.2. MODIFICATIONS TO LAND USE CCCCOOOODDDDEEEE STANDARDS 7.2.1. Tree Planting Standards a. Section 3.2.1.(D).(1).(c) is modified to exempt landscape areas within frontages, which are required to be landscaped in accordance with Section 4.7 Frontage standards. 7.2.2. Landscape Standards a. Section 3.2.1.(E).(1) buffering requirements may not be accomplished with landform shaping in T3, T4, or T5. b. Section 3.2.1.(E).(2).(d) Foundation Planting is modified to exempt the following: i. Buildings in T5; ii. Where building walls are located within 5 feet of lot lines; iii. Where walls or fencing visually obscures the building wall from view at frontages. c. Section 3.2.1.(E).(4).(b) Parking Lot Perimeter Landscaping is modified as follows: i. Residential uses in T5 do not require screening; ii. Non-residential uses do not require screening; iii. Mid-block parking lots in T5 only require screening from streets. 7.3. LANDSCAPE MMMMAAAATTTTEEEERRRRIIIIAAAALLLLSSSS 7.3.1. Landscape materials must comply with the following landscape materials lists and requirements: a. General Limitations i. City-approved species including native plants will be utilized; ii. Invasive species as listed in the Larimer County Noxious Weed Management Plan are prohibited; iii. Artificial plants or trees do not satisfy the requirements of this chapter. b. Edible Landscape i. Edible landscaping may be substituted for all landscape list materials except ground cover and grasses used adjacent to vehicular areas. ii. Edible landscape tree species within the public right-of-way and on private lots will be reviewed by City of Fort Collins at time of each PDP. 7.3.2. Native and pollinator supportive landscaping is recommended for ground cover, shrubs, and ornamental gardens. 7.4. JUSTIFICATION FFFFOOOORRRR PPPPRRRRIIIIVVVVAAAATTTTEEEE LLLLOOOOTTTT LLLLAAAANNNNDDDDSSSSCCCCAAAAPPPPIIIINNNNGGGG STANDARDS 7.4.1. As required by LUC Sections 4.29(G)(b) and (c), following is an in-depth explanation of how the modified development standards for Private Lot Landscaping advance and are necessary for the achievement of the development objectives of Montava. 7.4.2. Modifications to Landscape standards are necessary to enable the specific relationship between buildings and streets which is a key design feature of Montava. In the town center and other areas in the T5 district, buildings are located at the back of sidewalks. This ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 183 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 7:Private Lot LLLLaaaannnnddddssssccccaaaappppiiiinnnngggg 73 ooooffff 99994444 relationship supports walkable streets, but leaves no space for landscaping between the building and streets with exemption of public right-of-way street trees. In other districts, the architectural design vision for Montava locates buildings at different distances from the sidewalk depending on the condition, which affects the amount of landscaping that can be located along the building. Overall the amount of landscaping provided is no less than required in the existing, unmodified standards, but the location of that landscaping differs as a result of building relationships with the street. This relationship is referred to as frontage, which is addressed in some LUC standards and addressed in a high level of specificity in Montava’s design standards. Landscape standards modifications enable Montava’s highly detailed frontage standards to direct design vision. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 184 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 8:SSSSiiiiggggnnnnaaaaggggeeee 74 ooooffff 99994444 8. SIGNAGE 8.1. OVERVIEW 8.1.1. The development standards of LUC Section 3.8.7 shall apply to development in the Montava PUD Master Plan except as modified in this Chapter. 8.2. TRANSECT DISTRICT CORRELATION 8.2.1. For the purpose of determining applicable signage regulations in Section 3.8.7 of the Land Use Code, the Transect Districts correlate to Sign Districts as follows: a. T2: Commercial / Industrial b. T3: Single-Family c. T4: Mixed-Use d. T5: Downtown 8.3. MODIFICATIONS TO LAND LA ND USE CCCCOOOODDDDEEEE STANDARDS STANDARDS 8.3.1. External Sign Illumination a. Gooseneck and similar light sources which shield direct view of luminaires but are themselves visible and intended to be architecturally integrated into shopfronts are considered to conceal the light source from view, pursuant to Section 3.8.7.1(i)(3)(b). 8.4. JUSTIFICATION FFFFOOOORRRR SIGNAGE SSSSTTTTAAAANNNNDDDDAAAARRRRDDDDSSSS 8.4.1. As required by LUC Sections 4.29(G)(b) and (c), following is an in-depth explanation of how the modified development standards for Signage advance and are necessary for the achievement of the development objectives of Montava. Montava’s signage standards section provides a correlation between the City’s Sign Districts and Montava’s Transect Districts to ensure the correct Sign District is used. Because Montava’s town center is modeled on traditional downtowns like Downtown Fort Collins, the Downtown Sign District is applied to T5. Other districts - Mixed-Use and Single-Family - are applied to Transect Districts as correlated to their uses. The Commercial / Industrial Sign District is applied to T2 to account for farm-related business signage. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 185 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 9:Architectural Character 75 ooooffff 99994444 9. AAAARRRRCCCCHHHHIIIITTTTEEEECCCCTTTTUUUURRRRAAAALLLL CCCCHHHHAAAARRRRAAAACCCCTTTTEEEERRRR 9.1. OVERVIEW 9.1.1. The development standards of this Chapter 9 for Architectural Character shall apply to all development in the Montava PUD Master Plan. Such development modify all LUC standards in Article 3 and Divisions 4.5, 4.27 and 4.28 thereof which regulate architecture with exception of Division 3.8, Supplemental Regulations, which are the subject of Chapter 12. 9.2. BBBBUILDING UILDING MMMMAAAATTTTEEEERRRRIIIIAAAALLLLSSSS 9.2.1. Where multiple exterior materials are used on a single building, they may only be combined through horizontal transitions, with the heavier material below. a. Building attachments and projections may differ in material from the building volume, with the attachment or projection being of a lighter material, except for chimneys where the projection may be of a heavier material. 9.2.2. Vinyl siding must imitate wood in size, thickness, profile, and joining. 9.2.3. Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (E.I.F.S.) are prohibited. 9.2.4. All exposed exterior wood must be painted or stained. 9.3. OPENINGS 9.3.1. All openings, including porches, galleries, doors, and windows must be vertical or square in proportion. Horizontal openings may be provided by combining multiple vertical or square openings together. 9.3.2. Doors and windows that operate as sliders are prohibited along facades facing front or side street lot lines. 9.3.3. Where exterior shutters are installed, they must be operable, and sized and oriented to fit the entire opening when closed. 9.4. FOUNDATIONS 9.4.1. Any structure or building projection on a raised foundation with piers must have skirting or wood lattice screening between piers 9.5. SSSSOLAR OLAR ORIENTATION 9.5.1. Where practical, roofs should be designed to provide generally unobstructed roof surfaces facing south, south-east, or south-west, both in the overall roof form and in the location of ventilation stacks, antennae, and other rooftop equipment and openings. 9.5.2. Building volumes and openings should be oriented to capture south, south-east, and south- western light. 9.6. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AAAANNNNDDDD RRRREEEEFFFFUUUUSSSSEEEE STORAGE 9.6.1. Building mechanical equipment, at or above ground level, and refuse storage must not be visible from front or side street lot lines. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 186 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 9:Architectural Character 76 ooooffff 99994444 9.7. OUTBUILDINGS OU TBUILDINGS 9.7.1. Outbuildings, storage structures, and sheds should match the wall and roof style, color and material of the primary dwelling. 9.8. JUSTIFICATION FFFFOOOORRRR ARCHITECTURAL CCCCHHHHAAAARRRRAAAACCCCTTTTEEEERRRR SSSSTTTTAAAANNNNDDDDAAAARRRRDDDDSSSS 9.8.1. As required by LUC Sections 4.29(G)(b) and (c), following is an in-depth explanation of how the modified development standards for Architectural Character advance and are necessary for the achievement of the development objectives of Montava. 9.8.2. Building design within Montava is coordinated among a number of standards in Chapter 9 of the PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards regarding Lots and Buildings, and supplemented with the Architectural Character controls of this Chapter 9, addressing general issues of architectural design. Current LUC standards concerning character are aimed at minimizing the impact of suburban development patterns and buildings by ensuring variety within a single structure, particularly in commercial and multi-family areas. Development within Montava differs from the LUC’s expectations as it is oriented towards LUC goals at its core, and based upon character, not style, as a community-wide element of design. 9.8.3. Due to the scale of Montava, specific stylistic details and materials may change by neighborhood. At the overall PUD Master Plan level, architectural character standards address broad but common details to be further supplemented. This Architectural Character chapter deals with basic material prohibitions, the combination of materials, the shape of openings, orientation of building shape for solar access, the location of mechanical systems and refuse storage, and outbuilding design. This set of foundational standards are embedded in Chapter 9 of the PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards regarding Lots and Buildings, which ensures that building are oriented to face streets and open spaces, that projection into yards and on facade (such as porches and stoops), are usable and coordinated, that fencing is appropriate in scale and materials, that a minimum amount of doors and windows is provided along streets, and that shopfronts are well designed. Together these ensure an overall harmony among buildings within Montava, yet allow for more specific architectural detail to be determined by phase. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 187 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 10:Civic SSSSppppaaaacccceeee 77 ooooffff 99994444 10. CIVIC SSSSPPPPAAAACCCCEEEE 10.1. OVERVIEW 10.1.1. The development standards of this Chapter 10 for Civic Space shall apply to all development in the Montava PUD Master Plan. Such development standards modify all LUC standards in Article 3 and Divisions 4.5, 4.27 and 4.28 thereof which regulate civic space, with the exception of Division 3.8, Supplemental Regulations, which are the subject of Chapter 12. 10.2. CIVIC SPACE TYPES 10.2.1. A civic space type must be selected for all parks and recreation, urban agriculture, and open lands provided within T3.1, T3.2, T4, and T5, as illustrated in Table 10.1-1. 10.2.2. Civic space types must be configured according to Table 10.1-2, Table 10.1-3, and as follows: a. The minimum dimension must be maintained throughout the civic space; b. For triangular spaces, proportion is the ratio of the shortest edge length to the longest edge length; c. For irregular spaces, proportion is measured using an inscribed rectangle; d. Building coverage includes covered and enclosed structures; e. Required landscaping excludes stormwater management areas; f. A minimum of 50% of trees provided must be Canopy shade trees; g. Stormwater management and LID infrastructure may be integrated into civic space design where indicated in Table 10.1-3; h. Stormwater management areas should be shared use where possible; i. Where civic space abuts existing or planned pedestrian or bicycle trails, pedestrian and bicycle trails must be continued through the civic space. 10.2.3. Civic space types must be programmed according to the following: a. Programming must be selected from Table 10.1-4; b. Each civic space must include a minimum number of program elements, in addition to requirement elements, as specified in Table 10.1-4. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 188 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 10:Civic SSSSppppaaaacccceeee 78 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 11110000..2222--1.CCCCIIIIVVVVIIIICCCC SPACE SSSPPPAAACCCEEE TTTTYYYYPPPPEEEE IIIILLLLLLLLUUUUSSSSTTTTRRRRAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNNSSSS TYPE ILLUSTRATION TYPE ILLUSTRATION PARK SQUARE GREENWAY PLAZA COMPACT GREEN POCKET PARK GREEN PASSAGE ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 189 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 10:Civic SSSSppppaaaacccceeee 79 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 11110000..2222--2.CCCCIIIIVVVVIIIICCCC SPACE SSSPPPAAACCCEEE TTTTYYYYPPPPEEEESSSS -LLLLOOOOCCCCAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNN AAAANNNNDDDD DDDIIIMMMEEENNNSSSIIIOOONNNSSS DIMENSIONS TYPE TRANSECT DISTRICTS STREET FRONTAGE SIZE MINIMUM DIMENSION PROPORTIONS Natural Area All n/a 5 acres min. n/a n/a Park All 1 side min. 5 acres min. n/a n/a Greenway All 25% perimeter 2 acres min. (may be interrupted by streets) 40 ft. n/a Compact Green T3.2, T4 1 side min. 0.5 acres max. 40 ft. n/a Green T3.1, T3.2, T4 2 sides min. 0.5 - 5 acres 80 ft. 0.2:1 - 1:1 Square T4, T5 2 sides min. 0.2 - 3 acres 80 ft. 0.25:1 - 1:1 Plaza T5 1 side min. 0.2 - 2 acres 60 ft. 0.25:1 - 1:1 Pocket Park T3.2, T4, T5 1 side min. 1,000 sf - 0.25 acres 30 ft. 0.25:1 - 1:1 Passage All n/a n/a 12 ft. n/a ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 190 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 10:Civic SSSSppppaaaacccceeee 80 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 11110000..2222--3.CCCCIIIIVVVVIIIICCCC SSSSPPPPAAAACCCCEEEE TTTTYYYYPPPPEEEESSSS -DDDDEEEESSSSIIIIGGGGNNNN TYPE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE BUILDING COVERAGE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SEATING LIGHTING STORM WATER Natural Area n/a n/a TBD by City of Fort Collins n/a n/a ✓ Park n/a n/a TBD by City of Fort Collins Required Required ✓ Greenway 30% max. 1% max. 1 Canopy tree or 2 Ornamentals per 4,000 sf. Optional Optional ✓ Compact Green 30% max. 3% max. 1 Canopy tree or 2 Ornamentals per 3,000 sf. Optional Optional Green 40% max. 5% max. 1 Canopy tree or 2 Ornamentals per 3,000 sf. Required Required ✓ Square 60% max. 50% max. 1 Canopy tree or 2 Ornamentals per 4,000 sf. Required Required ✓ Plaza 50 - 90% 15% max. 1 Canopy tree or 2 Ornamentals per 6,000 sf. Required Required Pocket Park T3.2, T4: 50% max. T5: 80% max. 3% max. 1 Canopy tree or 2 Ornamentals per 3,000 sf. Required Optional Passage 70% max. n/a n/a n/a n/a ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 191 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 10:Civic SSSSppppaaaacccceeee 81 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 11110000..2222--4.CCCCIIIIVVVVIIIICCCC SPACE SSSPPPAAACCCEEE PPPPRRRROOOOGGGGRRRRAAAAMMMM PROGRAM NATURAL AREA PARK GREEN- WAY COMPACT GREEN GREEN SQUARE PLAZA POCKET PARK PASSAGE Program Elements n/a 5 min. 1 min. 1 min. 2 min. 2 min. 2 min. 1 min. n/a Formal Garden ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Community Garden* ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Pollinator Garden/Path* ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Playground ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Nature Play Area* ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Bird/Butterfly Garden* ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Dog Park ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Skate Park ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Exercise Equipment ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Athletic Fields - structured ✓ Athletic Fields - unstructured ✓ ✓ ✓ Paths (walking) Required Required Required ✓ Required Required Required ✓ Required Paths (cycling) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Performance Space ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Outdoor Dining & Sales ✓ ✓ ✓ Conservation Area Required ✓ ✓ ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 192 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 10:Civic SSSSppppaaaacccceeee 82 ooooffff 99994444 TTTTAAAABBBBLLLLEEEE 11110000..2222--4.CCCCIIIIVVVVIIIICCCC SPACE SSSPPPAAACCCEEE PPPPRRRROOOOGGGGRRRRAAAAMMMM PROGRAM NATURAL AREA PARK GREEN- WAY COMPACT GREEN GREEN SQUARE PLAZA POCKET PARK PASSAGE Restroom Facilities Required ✓ ✓ c. A minimum of two (2) Nature in the City elements, signified with an asterisk (*) in Table 10.1-4 shall be incorporated into each Phase of development. 10.3. JUSTFICATION FOR CCCCIIIIVVVVIIIICCCC SPACE STANDARDS 10.3.1. As required by LUC Sections 4.29(G)(b) and (c), following is an in-depth explanation of how the modified development standards for Civic Space advance and are necessary for the achievement of the development objectives of Montava. 10.3.2. Parks and open spaces, with the exception of the Community Park, are distributed broadly throughout Montava and vary in their design and programming. They are connected in a network throughout the community, providing trails, places for active and passive recreation, and places for gathering in a variety of different land use contexts. To coordinate civic space use and design with adjacent land uses, the development standards uses a series of recognizable types, such as plazas, squares, and greens, and relates them to the appropriate land use context. For instance, in the Town Center, plazas and squares with active programming are appropriate while within lower intensity neighborhoods, pocket parks and playgrounds are appropriate. Each civic space type has associated size and proportion requirements to ensure they are right-sized for their context and activities. Distributing and diversifying these spaces provides greater variety and more frequent access of open spaces to neighborhood residents, further supporting walkability. These standards are similar to the park requirements of Section 4.4, modifying them to implement the vision of Montava and ensuring that open spaces are active and diverse in support of LUC goals. 10.3.3. This modification to standards allows for design innovation by promoting a diversity of types of open spaces. While large neighborhood parks check the box, they don’t always meet residents’ needs, nor are they sufficiently close to where they live. Montava’s park system provides for open space activities and access in a more distributed manner, more frequently throughout the community. The distributed system allows the design of each open space to be coordinated with surrounding land uses. Additionally, a significant trail system is integrated into the community’s design, connecting surrounding regional trails and new community assets, providing a public benefit for both Montava residents and the City as a whole. 10.3.4. The civic space development standards ensure that the open spaces provided are activated to fulfill adequate public facility needs, while also ensuring that they are diverse in size, location, and design in order to implement the vision of Montava. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 193 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 10:Civic SSSSppppaaaacccceeee 83 ooooffff 99994444 Figure 3- Larger Civic Space Areas ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 194 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Developm Develo pm pment ent SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 11:Buffering 84 ooooffff 99994444 11. BUFFERING FFFFOOOORRRR RESIDENTIAL AAAANNNNDDDD HIGH OCCUPANCY BUILDING UNITS 11.1. OVERVIEW 11.1.1. The development standards of LUC Section 3.8.26 shall apply to development in the Montava PUD Master Plan except as modified in this Chapter. 11.2. MODIFICATIONS TO LAND USE CCCCOOOODDDDEEEE STANDARDS 11.2.1. Buffer reduction from plugged and abandoned wells a. Section 3.8.26.(C).(4).(b) is modified as follows and as subject to Sections 11.2.2 through 11.2.4 below: i. Minimum Buffer Distances. The following minimum buffer distances shall apply: (1) Residential Development. The minimum buffer between a dwelling and any oil and gas location shall be one hundred fifty (150) feet. Public playgrounds, parks, recreational fields, or community gathering spaces shall not be placed within a buffer. Private common areas within a buffer shall not contain playgrounds, parks, recreational fields, or community gathering spaces. (2) High Occupancy Building Units. The minimum buffer between a high occupancy building unit and any oil and gas location shall be one hundred fifty (150) feet. Public or private playgrounds, parks, recreational fields, or community gathering spaces shall not be allowed within a buffer b. The above Minimum Buffer Distances are exempt from the screening requirements of LUC Section 3.8.26 Chart 2 – Buffer Yard Types and Section 3.8.26.(C).(4).(e) regarding fencing. 11.2.2. Based on the results of the Phase II Environmental Assessment, the decision maker on a Project Development Plan for any phase of development that includes a residential dwelling within 500’, or a high occupancy building unit within 1000’ of either of the two oil well site locations within the Montava PUD Master Plan may impose conditions on the Project Development Plan which require: i. Remediation of environmental contamination to background levels by a qualified professional; and/or ii. Well repair or re-plugging of a previously abandoned well by a qualified professional. 11.2.3. The Developer shall for a period of five (5) years complete annual soil gas and groundwater monitoring at the well location(s) in accordance with the Sampling and Monitoring Plan approved pursuant to Section 11.3.2 below. 11.2.4. Disclosure. If any residential development or dwelling, or high occupancy building unit is proposed to be located within one thousand (1,000) feet of either of the two oil well site locations within the Montava PUD Master Plan, the following requirements shall apply: a. At such time as the property to be developed is platted or replatted, the plat shall show the one-thousand-foot radius on the property from such oil and gas location and shall contain a note informing subsequent property owners that certain lots shown on the plat are in close proximity to an existing oil and gas location. b. For residential developments requiring a declaration pursuant to the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act, a statement shall be included in such declaration specifying the lots within such residential development upon which dwellings may be constructed that ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 195 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Developm Develo pm pment ent SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 11:Buffering 85 ooooffff 99994444 are within one thousand (1,000) feet of an oil and gas location. The approved plat for such residential development shall be attached to the recorded declaration. Where no such declaration is required, the property owner shall record a statement on the property where the dwelling is located indicating that such property is located within one thousand feet of an oil and gas location. 11.3. JUSTIFICATION FFFFOOOORRRR BBBBUUUUFFFFFFFFEEEERRRRIIIINNNNGGGG FFFFOOOORRRR RRRREEEESSSSIIIIDDDDEEEENNNNTTTTIIIIAAAALLLL AND AND HHHHIIIIGGGGHHHH OOOOCCCCCCCCUUUUPPPPAAAANNNNCCCCYYYY BUILDING UUUUNNNNIIIITTTTSSSS 11.3.1. As required by LUC Sections 4.29(G)(3)(b) and (c), following is an in-depth explanation of how the modified development standards for Buffering for Residential and High Occupancy Building Units advance and are necessary for the achievement of the development objectives of Montava. 11.3.2. Based on the historic documentation obtained for the two well sites within the Montava PUD Master Plan boundary, neither of the wells have documented history of any active operations. The Lind Farms (west) wellbore documentation indicates it was drilled, abandoned and plugged within a short time period in 1973. The Chandler wellbore has only the documentation from the COGCC indicating from 1999 indicating it was drilled and abandoned. Historic documentation for the two wells has been provided as Supplemental Documentation to the PUD Master Plan. There is no visible sign of either well. Farming operations have been in place over the well locations for many years. The two well sites are mapped from the COGCC website, and GPS coordinates for each well are documented. Since there is no visible sign of the wells, the Developer engaged GPRS (Ground Penetrating Radar Systems, LLC) to confirm the location of the underground well heads. Using electromagnetic equipment, the two well locations were confirmed. Shallow excavations have been conducted in both locations, but no well head has been found or exposed, so are presumed to be deeper underground. A Phase I Environmental Assessment has been completed and is included as Supplemental Documentation to the PUD Master Plan. Subsequent to the Phase I Environmental Assessment, site investigation and sampling for the two on-site well locations was conducted by a qualified environmental engineering firm with experience in oil and gas investigations to demonstrate that the wells have been property abandoned and that soil, air and water quality has not been adversely impacted by oil and gas operations or facilities or other sources of contamination. The process for site investigation and sampling included the following: ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 196 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Developm Develo pm pment ent SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 11:Buffering 86 ooooffff 99994444 a. A Sampling and Monitoring Plan containing the following information was prepared by the qualified environmental engineering firm TRC Solutions and approved by the Director: i. Site survey, historical research, and/or physical locating techniques to determine exact location and extent of oil and gas operations and facilities ii. Documentation of plugging activities, abandonment and any subsequent inspections iii. Soil sampling, including soil gas testing means and methods iv. Groundwater sampling means and methods b. The qualified environmental engineering firm TRC Solutions conducted site investigations, sampling and testing in accordance with the approved Sampling and Monitoring Plan. c. Upon completion of the site investigations, sampling and testing, a Phase II Environmental Assessment written report was completed by the qualified environmental engineering firm TRC Solutions. The report verifies that the soil and groundwater samples meet applicable EPA and State residential regulations, that there are no constituents in the soil or groundwater that pose any risk to human health and the environment, so the proposed Minimum Buffer Distance in Section 11.2.1 above would not pose a greater health or safety risk for future residents or users of the site than the Minimum Buffer Distances set forth in Section 3.8.26(C)(4)(b). A copy of the approved Phase II Environmental Assessment is included as Supplemental Documentation to the PUD Master Plan. 11.3.3. Modifications to the minimum buffer distances from oil well locations are necessary to enable the uses and densities, including the farm, which are key features for Montava. The oil well sites are located in the area of the planned farm and contiguous residential neighborhoods. The west well area will be protected as a natural open space, and the east well area will remain in farming operations with the planned farm use. This modification significantly advances the development objectives of the PUD Master Plan by promoting innovation in design and contiguity within neighborhood uses. This modification provides greater documentation, testing and certainty of potential nuisances related to the abandoned, non-operational oil well sites. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 197 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 12:Modifications 87 ooooffff 99994444 12. MODIFICATIONS TO SSSSUUUUPPPPPPPPLLLLEEEEMMMMEEEENNNNTTTTAAAALLLL RRRREEEEGGGGUUUULLLLAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNNSSSS 12.1. OVERVIEW 12.1.1. Pursuant to LUC Section 4.29(G)(1), the Supplemental Regulations of LUC Division 3.8 are modified as set forth in Table 12.1 below. The provisions of Division 3.8 that are not modified herein or in Chapter 11 shall continue to be applicable to development within the Montava PUD Master Plan. Table 12.1-1 Modification to Supplemental Regulations Sec. Title Modification 3.8.7 Signs Sec. 3.8.7 will be modified in accordance with Chapter 8 of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. 3.8.9 Yards Sec. 3.8.9 is modified by Chapter 5 of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. 3.8.10 Single-Family and Two-Family Parking Requirements Sec. 3.8.7 is modified by Chapter 6 of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. 3.8.11 Fences and Walls Sec. 3.8.11 is modified by Chapter 5, Section 5.10 of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. 3.8.14 Preemption Uses Sec. 3.8.14 is modified to refer to the uses not permitted under the provisions of Chapter 2 of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards, and to compliance with all development standards of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. 3.8.15 Housing Model Variety Sec. 3.8.15 is modified by Chapter 5 of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. 3.8.17 Building Height Sec. 3.8.17 is modified by Chapter 5, Section 5.6 of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. 3.8.19 Setback Regulations Sec. 3.8.19 is modified by Chapter 5, Section 5.5 of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. 3.8.25 Permitted Uses; Abandonment Period/Reconstruction of Permitted Uses Sec. 3.8.25 is modified to refer to the applicable standards of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 198 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 12:Modifications 88 ooooffff 99994444 Table 12.1-1 Modification to Supplemental Regulations 3.8.28 Extra Occupancy Rental House Regulations Sec. 3.8.28 is modified to allow extra occupancy rental houses in Transect T4 subject to the occupancy limits and separation requirements of the L-M-N zone, and modified to allow extra occupancy rental houses in Transect T5 subject to the occupancy limits and separation requirements of the M-M-N zone, with both subject to basic development review and the occupancy restriction contained in Chapter 2, Section 2.3.5 of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. 3.8.30 Multi-family and Single-family Attached Dwelling Development Standards Sec. 3.8.30 is modified by Chapter 5 of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. 3.8.34 Short Term Rentals Sec. 3.8.34(C) is modified to refer to the transects and special districts of the Montava PUD Master Plan and their respective lists of permitted uses described in Chapter 2 of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. Sec. 3.8.34(D) is modified to refer to the Parking standards in Chapter 6 of the Montava PUD Master Plan Uses, Densities and Development Standards. 12.2. JUSTIFICATION FFFFOOOORRRR MODIFICATIONS 12.2.1. As required by LUC Sections 4.29(G)(b) and (c), following is an in-depth explanation of how the modifications to the Supplemental Regulations advance and are necessary for the achievement of the development objectives of Montava. 12.2.2. Unlike other LUC standards, the Supplemental Regulations cover a wide variety of subjects. As a result there are a variety of reasons that modifications are necessary to enable the development vision of Montava. 12.2.3. Section 3.8.7 Signs: This section is modified in order to correlate existing signage provisions to the Transect Districts used in Montava. Minor modifications are included in order to address the types of buildings planned for Montava’s town center. The building are similar to Downtown’s existing building stock. As such, the majority of existing standards are retained. 12.2.4. Sections 3.8.8 Lots and 3.8.9 Yards: These sections are closely related and replaced together by Montava’s design standards which specify lot sizes, setbacks, and frontage yard standards in accordance with the Transect Districts and building types planned for Montava. The Transect Districts each handle yards differently, related to the type of buildings and uses within them. Lot sizes, orientation, and boundaries similarly vary by Transect District in order to accommodate the building types and uses specific to each district. 12.2.5. Section 3.8.10 Single-Family and Two-Family Parking Requirements: This section is modified by Montava’s comprehensive parking standards, which include standards for each use, with differentiation based upon Transect District. This differentiation correlates with ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 199 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 12:Modifications 89 ooooffff 99994444 parking demand differences between neighborhoods and centers, and accommodates parking conditions anticipated by Montava’s development intent. 12.2.6. Section 3.8.11 Fencing and Walls: This section is modified by Montava’s design standards which are tightly correlated with standards for lots, yards, and building facades, coordinated by Transect District. Fencing allowances differ by Transect District in material, height, location, and where they are permitted or prohibited. The standards also address the Frontage Yard concept of the Montava design standards which is the most significant design control, coordinating yard elements according to the intensity of use in each district. 12.2.7. Section 3.8.14 Preemption Uses: This section is modified in order to correlate the existing standards with Montava’s Transect Districts, within which uses are regulated. Details of Section 3.8.14 standards are not modified. 12.2.8. Section 3.8.15 Housing Model Variety: This section is modified because it is provided for in an alternative manner and precludes unforeseen means of providing for model variety. Additionally, the repetition of a small number of units has been used very successfully as an advantageous design feature. Housing model control is provided by the mixture of Transect Districts and lot sizes proposed for Montava. Lot size variety responds to different housing types that are desired by the market. At the scale of Montava, the development has to attract residents from multiple market segments. Each phase of Montava targets 3 or more market segments, which demand different types and sizes of homes. Across the site, the mixture of Transect Districts further varies the lot conditions for homes, with different responses to varied setbacks and street conditions. Overall, variety of experience is central to Montava’s design vision. 12.2.9. Section 3.8.17 Building Height: This section is modified by Montava’s design standards in order to correlate building height to Montava’s Transect Districts and encourage compatibility. Building height is limited by the district, most of which are mixed-use. Height similarities between uses aids in use compatibility within mixed-use neighborhoods. Building height is correlated with setbacks and frontage yards to establish the character of each Transect District. 12.2.10. Section 3.8.19 Setback Regulations: This section is modified by Montava’s deisgn standards in order to correlate building height to Montava’s Transect Districts and encourage compatibility. Setbacks are determined by the Transect District rather than by building use. Consistent setback ranges between different uses and building types contributes to compatibility, along with similarities in building height. Similarly, a townhouse very close to the sidewalk with a stoop responds to a very different market demand and character than a townhouse with a deep, landscaped setback and a porch. The physical relationship between buildings and sidewalks and variation thereof across the site establishes the character of each Transect District. 12.2.11. Section 3.8.25 Permitted Uses; Abandonment Period/Reconstruction of Permitted Uses: This section is modified in order to reference the applicable Montava design standards as they are applicable to aspects of abandonment and reconstruction. Other specific requirements of Section 3.8.25 are not modified. 12.2.12. Section 3.8.28 Extra Occupancy Rental House Regulations: This section is modified in order to correlate Montava’s Transect Districts to the applicable standards in Section 3.8.28 for Transect Districts within which the use is permitted. Other specific requirements of Section 3.8.28 are not modified. 12.2.13. Section 3.8.30 Multi-Family and Single-Family Attached Dwelling Development Standards: This section is modified by Montava’s design standards which establish use compatibility ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 200 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 12:Modifications 90 ooooffff 99994444 within mixed-use neighborhoods by Transect Districts. Each district employs similar building height, setback, yard, and façade treatment standards in order to create compatibility between single-family, single-family attached, multi-family, and non- residential uses. 12.2.14. Section 3.8.34 Short Term Rentals: This section is modified to refer to the Transect District use tables for Montava in order to determine where Short Term Rentals are permitted, and to Montava’s parking standards for standards related to Short Term Rentals. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 201 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 13:Definitions 91 ooooffff 99994444 13. DEFINITIONS 13.1. REQUEST FFFFOOOORRRR MODIFIED DEFINITIONS 13.1.1. The following definitions shall apply whenever one of the following specific terms is used in the PUD Master Plan and such definition shall modify Section 5.1.2 of the LUC in regard to such terms. With the exception of the definitions contained in this Chapter 13 and any future definition modifications which may be approved, the definitions of LUC Section 5.1.2 shall apply to development within the PUD Master Plan. 13.1.2. Term. Definition. a. Accessory DDDDwwwweeeelllllllliiiinnnngggg Unit (ADU). A dwelling unit that is subservient to a primary dwelling unit in size, location, and design, often located above garages or in independent buildings towards the rear of a property. ADU’s may be rented provided the property owner lives in the primary dwelling unit. Alternatively, the property owner may live in the ADU and rent the primary dwelling unit. b. Alley Loaded.Referring to properties where vehicular access is provided from an alley. c. Civic Space.A district assigned to lands which are dedicated to public use, typically open space, areas for gathering and events, public institutions, and supportive structures including both public and private structures that support activities intended to occur within civic space. d. Cluster; Cottage Cluster;Clust er; Cluster Housing;Hous ing; ing; Building Cluster. More than one building arranged on a single lot or adjacent lots, designed together for aesthetic purposes or for the purpose of repeated building within Montava. e. Continuous Yard. A yard type where the yards of neighboring properties are not distinguished from each other by fencing, hedges, or buildings. f. Facade. The vertical elevation of a building along one plane. g. Farm animals.Animals commonly raised or kept in an agricultural, rather than an urban, environment, including, but not limited to, chickens, pigs, sheep, goats, horses, cattle, llamas, emus, ostriches, donkeys and mules, chicken hens, ducks or pygmy or dwarf goats h. Food ccccaaaatttteeeerrrriiiinnnngggg oooorrrr ssssmmmmaaaallllllll ffffoooooooodddd ppprrroooddduuucccttt product preparation.An establishment in which the principal use is the preparation of food and/or meals on the premises, and where such food and/or meals are delivered to another location for consumption or distribution, and where such use occupies not more than five thousand (5,000) square feet in gross floor area in T2 and not more than two thousand (2,000) square feet in gross floor area in T4. i. Food membership distribution site. A site where a producer of agricultural products delivers them for pick-up by customers who have pre-purchased an interest in the agricultural products. j. Front setback.The closest distance a structure is permitted to be located relative to the front lot line. k. Frontage. The portion of the property located between the front lot line and the primary structure front setback and between the side street lot line and the primary structure side street setback, extended to side and rear lot lines. l. Frontage, Primary.(see Primary Frontage) m. Frontage, Secondary.(see Secondary Frontage) ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 202 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 13:Definitions 92 ooooffff 99994444 n. Frontage Projection. Building elements that project forward more than 2 feet beyond frontage facades into the front setback or side street setback. o. Frontage Facade.The building facade closest to and facing the front lot line and the side street lot line. p. Frontage FFFFaaaaccccaaaaddddeeee Fencing.Fencing that is aligned with, or parallel up to 20 feet behind, a frontage facade, spanning between the frontage facade and a side or rear property line. q. Frontage Fencing.Yard fencing that is located along or within frontages. r. Frontage Landscaping.Landscaping that is located within a frontage. s. Fronttttaaaaggggeeee Fron Yard.The portion of a property located between frontage facades and frontages. t. Glazing; Facade Glazing. The portion of a building facade that is comprised of transparent glass, typically set in windows and doors. u. Housing Cluster.(see Cluster Housing) v. Intensity. A relative measure used to describe the extent or amount of activity, housing, or diverse uses in a given area. w. Landscape area means that area within the boundaries of a lot or tract of land which consists of planting materials including, but not limited to, trees, shrubs, ground covers, grass, flowers, and native plant materials; also including, but not limited to, inorganic features such as concrete planters, stone, brick, and aggregate forms, water, and other landscape elements. Inorganic elements shall not predominate over the use of organic plant material. Artificial plants are not considered landscape materials. x. Liner Building.A building or structure that is located between an off-street parking area and a street, which provides a visual barrier partially or wholly obscuring the off-street parking area from view by pedestrians along sidewalks. y. Lot Coverage.The portion of a lot that is covered by impervious surfaces as a percentage of the gross lot area. z. Lot Occupation.The portion of a lot that is covered by buildings and covered structures as a percentage of the gross lot area. aa. OOOOffffffff--street ppppaaaarrrrkkkkiiiinnnngggg space.A parking space on private land accessible from a usable street or alley. bb. Open-Open -air ffffaaaarrrrmmmmeeeerrrrssss market.An occasional or periodic market held in an open area or in a structure where groups of individual sellers offer for sale to the public such items as fresh produce, seasonal fruits, fresh flowers, arts and crafts items, and food and beverages (but not to include second-hand goods) dispensed from booths located on-site. cc. OOOOuuuuttttbbbbuuuuiiiillllddddiiiinnnngggg..A structure that is of secondary importance, due to both size and use, to one or more principal buildings on a lot. Outbuildings may contain accessory uses, including accessory dwelling units. dd. Outdoor vendor.Any person, whether as owner, agent, consignee or employee, who sells or attempts to sell, or who offers to the public free of charge, any services, goods, wares or merchandise, including, but not limited to, food or beverage, from any outdoor location, except for those activities excluded from the definition of outdoor vendor in §15-381 of the City Code. ee. PPPPrrrriiiimmmmaaaarrrryyyy Frontage. Frontage that is located along the property line that bears the lot’s address. ff. PPPPrrrriiiinnnncccciiiippppaaaallll BBBBuuuuiiiillllddddiiiinnnnggggssss..Any structure on a lot that is not considered an outbuilding. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 203 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 13:Definitions 93 ooooffff 99994444 gg. RRRReeeeaaaarrrr AAAAlllllllleeeeyyyy Setback.The closest distance a structure is permitted to be located relative to the rear lot line in instances that an alley is located along the rear lot line. hh. Rear Setback.The closest distance a structure is permitted to be located relative to the rear lot line. ii. Secondary Frontage.All frontages other than the primary frontage. jj. Shopfront. The portion of a facade bordering a commercial occupancy or tenant. kk. Side Setback. The closest distance a structure is permitted to be located relative to the side lot line. ll. Side Street LLLLooootttt Line.Any lot line, other than the front lot line, that is located along a right-of-way or civic space. mm. Side SSSSttttrrrreeeeeeeetttt Setback.The closest distance a structure is permitted to be located relative to the side street lot line. nn. Side SSSShhhhaaaarrrreeeedddd Fencing.Fencing that is located along property lines shared between two or more properties. oo. STC. Sound Transmission Class, a standard measure of the amount of sound insulation provided by a material or assembly of materials.. pp. Story. The vertical extent of one floor within a structure. qq. Street Screen.A wall, hedge, structure, or other element that partially or wholly obscures the view of off-street parking and services areas from view by pedestrians along sidewalks. rr. Transect.Tr ansect. An organizational element used to arrange, divide, and allocate elements of the built environment and their regulations in order to establish compatibility through intensity of use, diversity of use, hardness of material, height of buildings, and other elements of the built environment rather than through the buffering of different adjacent uses. ss. Urban agriculture.Gardening or farming involving any kind of lawful plant, whether for personal consumption, sale and/or donation, including the cultivation, storage and sale of crops, vegetables, plants and flowers produced on the premises. tt. Value Added Agriculture. Processing, packaging and preservation of agricultural commodities and products for storage or sale. uu. Veterinary facilities,hospital. Any facility which is maintained by or for the use of a licensed veterinarian in the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of animal diseases. 13.2. JUSTFICATION FOR DEFINITIONS 13.2.1. As required by LUC Sections 4.29(G)(b) and (c), following is an explanation of how the modified Definitions advance and are necessary for the achievement of the development objectives of Montava. To ensure that Montava’s development standards are properly interpreted, a set of additional definitions is provided. Three types of terms are included: terms that are unique to Montava are included, terms within the Land Use Code that are modified for use within Montava, and terms within the Land Use Code we wish to vest with their current definition. Some terms are similar to LUC terms, such as those relating to lot lines and frontages. These new definitions are designed to clarify regulations relating to frontage, which also rely upon lot lines to determine where frontages are located. These development standards focus more heavily on frontage than the LUC, necessitating new definitions. New use definitions are also included, primarily to ensure that the Farm can fully function and that agrarian ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 204 Montava Uses,Densities, aaaannnndddd Development SSSSttttaaaannnnddddaaaarrrrddddssss CH 13:Definitions 94 ooooffff 99994444 elements can be fully integrated into Montava, as envisioned in the Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 205 0 ft. min. T3.2 Principal Buildings 12 ft. min. 6 ft. min. 6 ft. min. 12 ft. min. 0 ft. min. T3.2 Outbuildings 2 ft. min. 4 ft. min. 6 ft. min. 6 ft. min. 0 ft. min. T3.1 Principal Buildings 16 ft. min. 10 ft. min. 10 ft. min. 12 ft. min. 20 ft. min. T3.1 Outbuildings 30 ft. min. 6 ft. min. 6 ft. min. 6 ft. min. 3 ft. min. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4 Work Session Packet Pg. 152 Work Session Packet Pg. 111 T3.1 S S S S I MONTAVA OVERALL UTILITY PLAN PUD MASTER PLAN PUD TRANSECT PUD DISTRICTS DISTRICTS AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS 86 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3 Work Session Packet Pg. 110 NEIGHBORHOOD LL E - EMPLOYMENT EM EMENTA ENNTTAARRYYY NTA TA RY Y E - EMPLOYMENT I - INDUSTRIAL Existing Zoning BHA DESIGN, INC. 10/22/18 EXISTING ZONING 57 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3 Work Session Packet Pg. 109 0’ 200’ 400’ 600’ 800’ 1,600’ 3 1 2 2 4 5 6 7 7 13 8 10 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 8 8 14 9 12 12 11 14 14 13 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 16 16 14 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 16 18 19 19 19 19 INTERSTATE 25 4 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3 Work Session Packet Pg. 108 150' MODIFIED BUFFER, SEE CHAPTER 11 OF THE MONTAVA USES, DENSITIES AND DEVELOPMENT STDS 500' BUFFER ACCORDING TO L.U.C. SEC. 3.8.26 EXISTING OIL WELL, DRILLED AND ABANDONED 150' MODIFIED BUFFER, SEE CHAPTER 11 OF THE MONTAVA USES, DENSITIES AND DEVELOPMENT STDS 500' BUFFER ACCORDING TO L.U.C. SEC. 3.8.26 EXISTING TREES, TYP. EXISTING OFF-SITE OIL WELL, CAPPED AND ABANDONED (NOT A PART) 150' MIN REDUCED BUFFER AVAILABLE BY ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE ACCORDING TO L.U.C. SEC. 3.8.26 (NOT A PART) 500' BUFFER ACCORDING TO L.U.C. SEC. 3.8.26 (NOT A PART) EXISTING OFF-SITE OIL WELL, CAPPED AND ABANDONED (NOT A PART) 150' MIN REDUCED BUFFER AVAILABLE BY ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE ACCORDING TO L.U.C. SEC. 3.8.26 (NOT A PART) 500' BUFFER ACCORDING TO L.U.C. SEC. 3.8.26 (NOT A PART) PUD BOUNDARY / LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT PUD BOUNDARY / LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT TURNBERRY RD (CR 11) PUD BOUNDARY / LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT NO. 8 DITCH / WETLAND 4 PUD BOUNDARY PUD BOUNDARY / LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT PUD BOUNDARY / LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT BNSF RAILWAY PUD BOUNDARY / LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT CITY OF FORT COLLINS BNSF RAILWAY PUD BOUNDARY / LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT PUD BOUNDARY LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT NO. 8 DITCH / WETLAND 4 NO. 8 DITCH NORTH TIMBERLINE ROAD L&W CANAL 1000' BUFFER FROM HIGH-OCCUPANCY BUILDING UNITS ACCORDING TO L.U.C. SEC. 3.8.26 1000' BUFFER FROM HIGH-OCCUPANCY BUILDING UNITS ACCORDING TO L.U.C. SEC. 3.8.26 1000' BUFFER FROM HIGH-OCCUPANCY BUILDING UNITS ACCORDING TO L.U.C. SEC. 3.8.26 (NOT A PART) 1000' BUFFER FROM HIGH-OCCUPANCY BUILDING UNITS ACCORDING TO L.U.C. SEC. 3.8.26 (NOT A PART) Sheet Number: Project Number: Project: Client: 1603 Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 p. (970) 223-7577 www.BHADesign.com Landscape Architecture Urban Design Master Planning L:\PROJECTS\MONTAVA\DWGS\ACAD\PUD\DWG\PUD_EX-COND-PLAN.DWG Plot Date:7/24/2019 9:28 AM Plotted By: Angie Milewski Date Created:9/18/2018 Produced by: Date: Revision & Date: AKM 7/23/2019 1734 HF2M MONTAVA MONTAVA EX CONDITIONS & NATURAL FEATURES PUD MASTER PLAN 1. THIS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHOWS THE GENERAL LOCATION AND APPROXIMATE SIZE OF ALL NATURAL AREAS, HABITATS, AND FEATURES WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES AND THE PROPOSED ROUGH ESTIMATE OF THE NATURAL AREA BUFFER ZONES AS REQUIRED BY LAND USE CODE SECTION 3.4.1(E). DETAILED MAPPING OF THE SITE'S NATURAL AREAS, HABITATS, AND FEATURES WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF INDIVIDUAL PDP SUBMITTALS. GENERAL BUFFER ZONES SHOWN ON THIS PUD MAY BE REDUCED OR ENLARGED BY THE DECISION MAKER DURING THE PUD PROCESS." 2. A SITE VISIT MAY BE NECESSARY TO DETERMINE WHICH FEATURES REQUIRE DOCUMENTATION AND BUFFERING ON THE PUD. 3. PLEASE SEE SECTION 3.4.1 OF THE LAND USE CODE FOR ALLOWABLE USES WITHIN THE NATURAL HABITAT BUFFER ZONES. 4. STANDARDS FOR PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION - THE DIRECTOR SHALL ESTABLISH A "LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT" ("LOD") LINE(S) TO ESTABLISH THE BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT OUTSIDE OF WHICH NO LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES WILL OCCUR DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. 5. SEE SECTION 3.4.1 OF THE LAND USE CODE FOR ALLOWABLE USES WITHIN THE BUFFER ZONE. 6. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE ORGANIZED AND TIMED TO MINIMIZE THE DISTURBANCE OF SENSITIVE SPECIES OCCUPYING OR USING ON-SITE AND ADJACENT NATURAL HABITATS OR FEATURES. 7. CONSTRUCTION OF BARRIER FENCING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE LIMITS OF THE DEVELOPMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8. BY PDP PROJECT HEARING: CONFIRMATION UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE) JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION PROCESS HAS BEGUN; ESSENTIALLY THAT USACE HAS BEEN CONTACTED AND DATA SUBMITTED. 9. BY PDP FINAL PLAN AND NO LATER THAN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (DCP): DOCUMENTATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION LETTER FROM USACE AND SIGN_OFF THAT PROJECT MEETS CLEAN WATER ACT REQUIREMENTS. 10. BY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA): WEED MANAGEMENT AND NHBZ ANNUAL MONITORING PLANS 11. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF DCP: COPY OF NATIONWIDE 404 PERMIT DOCUMENTATION. 12. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF DCP: 1) ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING APPROVED SECURITY BASED ON 125% COST OF ITEMIZED LIST OF NHBZ INSTALLATION COSTS (MATERIAL AND LABOR); 2) SECURITY BASED ON 125% COST OF WEED MANAGEMENT AND ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT. 13. A FULL TREE INVENTORY FOR MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CONDUCTED AT THE TIME OF PDP FOR EACH PHASE 14. THE PUD BOUNDARY AND LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT DEPICTED ARE NOT INTENDED TO DELINEATE STREET FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT LIMITS. ABUTTING STREET IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER CITY REQUIREMENTS NATURAL HABITATS AND FEATURES NOTES NATURAL FEATURES SQ. FT. TABLE APPROX. SQUARE FOOTAGES OF NATURAL FEATURES WITHIN PUD AREA (AS DETERMINED BY ERO: ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION SURVEY, JUNE 27, 2018) NON-JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES NAME SIZE: AC (SF) 1 IRRIGATION DITCH 1 0.011 AC (479.16 SF) 2 IRRIGATION DITCH 2 0.031 AC (1,350.36 SF) 3 IRRIGATION DITCH 3 0.042 AC (1,829.52 SF) 4 IRRIGATION DITCH 4 0.038 AC (1,655.28 SF) 5 IRRIGATION DITCH 5 0.047 AC (2,047.32 SF) 6 WETLAND 1 0.42 AC (18,295.2 SF) 7 WETLAND 2 0.72 AC (31,363.2 SF) TOTAL 1.309 AC (57,020.04 SF) JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES 8 WETLAND 3 0.30 AC (13,068.0 SF) 9 WETLAND 4/NO 8 DITCH 0.813 AC (35,414.28 SF) TOTAL 1.113 AC (48,482.28 SF) 2 0 225' 450' 675' 900' 1800' ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3 Work Session Packet Pg. 106 AND EVALUATION. PARKS DIAGRAM BICYCLE PLAN BLOCK LEVEL DETAIL STUDIES ARTERIAL INTERSECTIONS DIAGRAM PEDESTRIAN SHEDS GRADING AND UTILITY PLANS STREET SECTIONS BOOKLET INFORMATION REGARDING TCEF PERCENTAGES INFORMATION REGARDING STORMWATER DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS INFORMATION REGARDING UTILITY LOCATION AND DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS INFORMATION REGARDING NATURAL AREAS DESIGN AND PARTNERSHIP INFORMATION REGARDING PARK, TRAIL, GRADE-SEPARATED CROSSINGS COGCC WELL SITE DOCUMENTATION SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN, TRC, JUNE 21, 2018 PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 4. PUBLIC STREETS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE "LARIMER COUNTY URBAN AREA STREET STANDARDS" OR APPROVED VARIANCES THERETO. THE ACCESS POINTS SHOWN ON THIS MONTAVA - PUD MASTER PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS ONLY. FINAL LOCATIONS OF ACCESS POINTS WILL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF INDIVIDUAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 5. PER LUC SECTION 3.7.3(E)(1), ALL TRANSPORTATION, WATER AND WASTEWATER, STORM DRAINAGE, EMERGENCY SERVICES, AND ELECTRIC POWER FACILITIES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES AT THE TIME OF INDIVIDUAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 6. THIS MONTAVA - PUD MASTER PLAN SHOWS THE GENERAL LOCATION AND APPROXIMATE SIZE OF NATURAL AREAS, HABITATS AND FEATURES WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES AND THE PROPOSED ROUGH ESTIMATE OF THE NATURAL AREA BUFFER ZONE AS IDENTIFIED AND REQUIRED BY LAND USE CODE SECTION 3.4.1(E). DETAILED MAPPING OF NATURAL AREAS, HABITATS, AND FEATURES WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF INDIVIDUAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUP BMITTALS. GENERAL BUFFER ZONES SHOWN ON THIS MONTAVA - PUD MASTER PLAN MAY BE REDUCED OR ENLARGED BY THE DECISION MAKER FOR INDIVIDUAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAND USE CODE SECTION (E)(1). 7. AT THE TIME OF EACH PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AN ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION STUDY (ECS) WILL BE PERFORMED TO MATCH THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN. EACH SUCH ECS WILL DOCUMENT EXISTING SIGNIFICANT ECOLOGICAL VALUE OF THE SITE, AND PROPOSE MITIGATION FOR THE IMPACTS THE DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE TO THE ECOLOGICAL VALUE OF THE SITE AS REQUIRED BY LAND USE CODE SECTION 3.4.1. NOTES OWNER'S CERTIFICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT the Poudre R-1 School District, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, certifies that it is a lawful owner of property within the Montava - PUD Master Plan and consents to the inclusion of its property therein, but acknowledges that development of its property is not subject to the jurisdiction of the City of Fort Collins or the requirements of the Montava – PUD Master Plan. [Note: This certification is under discussion with the City Attorney.] POUDRE R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT By: ____________________________ Printed Name: ___________________ Title: __________________________ APPROVED: This Planned Unit Development to be known as the Montava - PUD Master Plan is approved by Ordinance No. _______, 2019, passed and adopted on final reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of Fort Collins, Colorado, held on April 16, 2019. ______________________ City Clerk SHEET INDEX SHEET 1 COVER SHEET SHEET 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NATURAL FEATURES SHEET 3 OVERALL MASTER PLAN SHEET 4 ANNOTATED MASTER PLAN SHEET 5 EXISTING ZONING SHEET 6 PUD TRANSECT DISTRICTS AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS SHEET 7 CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PHASING PLAN VICINITY MAP NTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BHA DESIGN, INC. 1603 OAKRIDGE DRIVE, SUITE 100 FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 PHONE: 970.223.7577 CONTACT: ANGELA MILEWSKI EMAIL: AMILEWSKI@BHADESIGN.COM CIVIL ENGINEER: MARTIN/MARTIN, INC. 12499 W COLFAX AVE LAKEWOOD, CO 80215 PHONE: 303.431.6100 CONTACT: PETER BUCKLEY EMAIL: PBUCKLEY@MARTINMARTIN.COM TEAM DIRECTORY SITE N O R T H OWNER/DEVELOPER: HF2M 430 N COLLEGE AVE. SUITE 410 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80521 PHONE: 512.507.5570 CONTACT: MAX MOSS EMAIL: MAX@HF2M.COM 1 PLANNER: DPZ CODESIGN 7435 NE HALSEY ST PORTLAND, OR 97213 PHONE: 305.799.3892 CONTACT: MATT LAMBERT EMAIL: MATT@DPZ.COM TRAFFIC CONSULTANT: RUTH ROLLINS CONSULT, INC. PHONE: 970.213.2393 CONTACT: RUTH ROLLINS EMAIL: RUTHIE.ROLLINS@GMAIL.COM TRAFFIC ENGINEER: NELSON\NYGAARD 77 FRANKLIN STREET, 10TH FLOOR BOSTON, MA 02110 PHONE: 857.305.8005 CONTACT: MICHAEL RIEBE EMAIL: MRIEBE@NELSONNYGAARD.COM MONTAVA - PUD MASTER PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IN THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 32, A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 32, AND THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 8 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO; AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 32 WHENCE THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER BEARS S00°29'18"E A DISTANCE OF 5289.91 FEET AND CONSIDERING ALL BEARINGS HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO; THENCE S89°35'02"E A DISTANCE OF 2638.10 FEET; THENCE S89°53'24"E A DISTANCE OF 1773.90 FEET; THENCE S00°00'00"E A DISTANCE OF 472.51 FEET; THENCE S89°53'24"E A DISTANCE OF 864.73 FEET; THENCE S00°16'21"E A DISTANCE OF 1513.06 FEET; THENCE S89°59'54"E A DISTANCE OF 397.54 FEET; THENCE S00°20'11"E A DISTANCE OF 380.10 FEET; THENCE S89°59'31"E A DISTANCE OF 397.12 FEET; THENCE S00°16'21"E A DISTANCE OF 2906.93 FEET; THENCE S00°06'47"E A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE S89°47'00"E A DISTANCE OF 945.36 FEET; THENCE S00°00'50"E A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE N89°59'10"E A DISTANCE OF 1022.26 FEET; THENCE S84°33'41"E A DISTANCE OF 150.45 FEET; THENCE S00°31'28"E A DISTANCE OF 220.49 FEET; THENCE S19°10'52"E A DISTANCE OF 716.33 FEET; THENCE S06°01'40"E A DISTANCE OF 296.08 FEET; THENCE S00°30'00"W A DISTANCE OF 783.98 FEET; THENCE N88°21'45"W A DISTANCE OF 92.96 FEET; THENCE S86°38'10"W A DISTANCE OF 1900.01 FEET; THENCE S68°38'10"W A DISTANCE OF 99.99 FEET; THENCE S55°58'15" W A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE S36°58'15"W A DISTANCE OF 199.96 FEET; THENCE S89°38'15"W A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE S00°06'47"W A DISTANCE OF 139.93 FEET; THENCE N89°11'06"W A DISTANCE OF 2627.63 FEET; THENCE N00°23'56"E A DISTANCE OF 2580.05 FEET; THENCE N89°53'45W A DISTANCE OF 2639.82 FEET; THENCE S89°44'44"W A DISTANCE OF 1339.28 FEET; THENCE N01°15'55"W A DISTANCE OF 1062.88 FEET; THENCE S89°50'10"W A DISTANCE OF 721.52 FEET; THENCE N01°15'28"W A DISTANCE OF 1589.29 FEET; THENCE N89°50'10"E A DISTANCE OF 2060.57 FEET; THENCE N00°29'18"W A DISTANCE OF 2644.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 999.25 ACRES (43,527,318.65 SQUARE FEET) MORE OR LESS AND IS SUBJECT TO ALL RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS NOW IN USE OR OF RECORD. LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPROVAL OF THIS MONTAVA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - MASTER PLAN CREATES A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-68-103 COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, AS AMENDED, AND FORT COLLINS LAND USE CODE SECTION 2.2.11(C) STATE OF COLORADO) )SS COUNTY OF LARIMER) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by My commission expires: ____________________________ __________________________ Notary Public KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT the Anheuser-Busch Foundation, being an owner of property within the Montava - PUD Master Plan, does certify that it accepts the conditions and restrictions set forth on said plan and in the conditions of approval by the City of Fort Collins, dated _______________, 2019 and consents to the recordation of any information pertaining thereto. ANHEUSER-BUSCH FOUNDATION, a Missouri charitable trust By: ____________________________ Printed Name: ___________________ Title: __________________________ STATE OF COLORADO) )SS COUNTY OF LARIMER) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by My commission expires: ____________________________ __________________________ Notary Public ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3 Work Session Packet Pg. 105 Bike Buffer Width - TYPICAL ADJACENT PRIVATE ALLEY EASEMENT Where buildings exceed 30 ft, additional alley width is required to accom- modate fire access. MONTAVA | ©2018 DPZ CoDESIGN DRAFT 01/01/19 19 STREET TYPES 8 | PAIRED ONE-WAY LOCAL, T5 8B | PAIRED ONE-WAY LOCAL (T5) Right-of-Way 53 ft Roadway Width 20 ft Transect Zones T5 Parking Lanes 1 Sidewalk 8 ft Parking Width 8 Parkway Type Long tree well Travel Lanes 1 Parkway Width 10 ft Lane Width 12 ft Curb & Gutter Type Vertical Curb Width 0.5 ft Specifications are for each side of the Gutter Width 1.5 ft private median. Bike Facility Type Shared lane Bike Lane Width - Bike Buffer Width - TYPICAL ADJACENT PRIVATE ALLEY EASEMENT Where buildings exceed 30 ft, additional alley width is required to accommodate fire access. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 64 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 47 IHHW * "Base standard" for each type of buffer yard is that width which has a plant multiplier. ** "Plant multipliers" are used to increase or decrease the amount of required plants based on providing a buffer yard of reduced or greater width or by the addition of a wall, berm or fence. *** Shrub types: Type 1: 4' - 8' High Type 2: Over 8' High 2UG1R2UG1R108, 2013 ²2UG1R114, 2018 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 45 2SWLRQ :LGWK 3ODQW 0XOWLSOLHU 2SWLRQ$GG :DOO 2SWLRQ$GG %HUPRU )HQFH %XIIHU<DUG$ IHHW IHHW 6KDGH7UHHV IHHW 2UQDPHQWDO7UHHVRU7\SH6KUXEV IHHW (YHUJUHHQ7UHHV IHHW 6KUXEV 7\SH7\SH IHHW %XIIHU<DUG% IHHW IHHW IHHW 6KDGH7UHHV IHHW 2UQDPHQWDO7UHHVRU7\SH6KUXEV IHHW (YHUJUHHQ7UHHV IHHW 6KUXEV 7\SH IHHW %XIIHU<DUG& IHHW IHHW IHHW 6KDGH7UHHV IHHW 2UQDPHQWDO7UHHVRU7\SH6KUXEV IHHW (YHUJUHHQ7UHHV IHHW 6KUXEV 7\SH IHHW %XIIHU<DUG' IHHW IHHW IHHW 6KDGH7UHHV IHHW ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 44 +LJK % :DUHKRXVH GLVWULEXWLRQIDFLOLWLHV +LJK % :RUNVKRSVDQGFXVWRPVPDOOLQGXVWU\ 0HGLXP $ ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 43 SURSHUW\ IURQWDJHRU SHUIWRI SURSHUW\IURQWDJH LIVHFXUHGWR WHPSRUDU\ FRQVWUXFWLRQ IHQFLQJUHODWHGWR SHUPLWWHG FRQVWUXFWLRQ PD\EH FOXVWHUHG SURSHUW\IURQWDJHRU SHUIWRISURSHUW\ IURQWDJHLIVHFXUHGWR WHPSRUDU\ FRQVWUXFWLRQIHQFLQJ UHODWHGWRSHUPLWWHG FRQVWUXFWLRQ PD\EH FOXVWHUHG 0D[6LJQ $UHD SHU EDQQHU VI VI VI VI $OORZHG /LJKWLQJ 1RQH 1RQH 1RQH 1RQH 0D[6LJQ +HLJKW DSSOLHV WRIUHHVWDQGLQJ EDQQHUIUDPHV IW IW IW IW (5) For banners and pennants in all sign districts, the following shall apply: (a) mounting hardware shall be concealed from view; (b) banners shall be stretched tightly to avoid movement in windy conditions; (c) all banners that are installed in banner frames shall be sized to fit the banner frame so that there are no visible gaps between the edges of the banner and the banner frame; (d) banners are not allowed if any of the following are present on the property: feather flag, yard sign, site sign, or swing sign; (e) any common line of pennants must be stretched tightly to avoid movement in windy conditions. 2UG1R2UG1R2UG1R 2UG1R2UG1R2UG 1R2UG1R2UG1R² 2UG1R²2UG1R2UG1R ²2UG2UG1R2UG1R 2UG1R2UG1R² 2UG1R031, 2013 2UG1R088, 2017 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg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ork Session Packet Pg. 39 obtained from the Director. The Director shall issue a permit for the display of banners and pennants only in locations where such banners and pennants will not cause unreasonable annoyance or inconvenience to adjoining property owners or other persons in the area and on such additional conditions as deemed necessary to protect adjoining premises and the public. All banners and pennants shall be removed on or before the expiration date of the permit. If any person, business or organization erects any banners or pennants without receiving a permit, as herein provided, the person, business or organization shall be ineligible to receive a permit for a banner or pennant for the remainder of the calendar year. (2) Each business or non-profit entity or other organization, and each individual not affiliated with an entity or organization, shall be eligible to display banners and pennants pursuant to a valid permit for a maximum of forty (40) days per calendar year. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 38 ض :RRGRUPHWDO ض ' (3)XUDWLRQRI'LVSOD\ (a) In general, a temporary sign shall be removed as of the earlier of the date that: 1. it becomes an abandoned sign; or 2. it falls into disrepair (see Section 3.8.7.2(H)); or 3. the number of days set out in Table G2, Duration of Temporary Sign Display by Material Class, expires. 7DEOH* 'XUDWLRQRI7HPSRUDU\6LJQ'LVSOD\E\0DWHULDO&ODVV 6LJQ7\SH 0D['XUDWLRQIRU,QGLYLGXDO6LJQE\0DWHULDO&ODVV 0D[3RVWLQJ HDU 'D\V< <DUG6LJQ 1RW $OORZHG GD\V 1RW $OORZHG GD\V GD\V GD\V 6LWH6LJQ 1RW $OORZHG 1RW $OORZHG 1RW $OORZHG GD\V GD\V GD\V ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 37 EDQQHULV SUHVHQW 0XVWEHLQVWDOOHG LQDSHUPHDEOH ODQGVFDSHGDUHD ZLWKDUDGLXVWKDW H[WHQGVQRWOHVV WKDQIWIURPWKH IODJSROH 1RWDOORZHGLI IUHHVWDQGLQJ EDQQHULV SUHVHQW 0XVWEHLQVWDOOHG LQDSHUPHDEOH ODQGVFDSHGDUHD ZLWKDUDGLXVWKDW H[WHQGVQRWOHVV WKDQIWIURPWKH IODJSROH 0XVWEHLQVWDOOHGLQD SHUPHDEOHODQGVFDSHG DUHDZLWKDUDGLXVWKDW H[WHQGVQRWOHVVWKDQ IWIURPWKHIODJSROH 1$ ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 36 IWIURP EXLOGLQJ ZDOOV 2WKHU 6WDQGDUGV :KHUHDOORZHG VLWH VLJQVVKDOOEH LQVWDOOHG LQSHUPHDEOH ODQGVFDSHGDUHDVRU KDUGVFDSHGDUHDV RWKHUWKDQ YHKLFXODUXVHDUHDV DQG VLGHZDONVWKDWDUH DW OHDVWIWLQHYHU\ KRUL]RQWDO GLPHQVLRQDQG DWOHDVWVILQ DUHD :KHUHDOORZHG VLWH VLJQVVKDOOEH LQVWDOOHG LQSHUPHDEOH ODQGVFDSHGDUHDV RU KDUGVFDSHGDUHDV RWKHUWKDQ YHKLFXODUXVH DUHDVDQG VLGHZDONVWKDWDUH DW OHDVWIWLQHYHU\ KRUL]RQWDO GLPHQVLRQDQG DWOHDVWVILQ DUHD :KHUHDOORZHGVLWH VLJQVVKDOOEHLQVWDOOHG LQSHUPHDEOH ODQGVFDSHGDUHDVRU KDUGVFDSHGDUHDVRWKHU WKDQ YHKLFXODUXVHDUHDVDQG VLGHZDONVWKDWDUHDW OHDVWIWLQHYHU\ KRUL]RQWDOGLPHQVLRQ DQG DWOHDVWVILQDUHD :KHUHDOORZHG VLWH VLJQVVKDOOEH LQVWDOOHG LQSHUPHDEOH ODQGVFDSHGDUHDV RU KDUGVFDSHGDUHDV RWKHUWKDQ YHKLFXODUXVH DUHDVDQG VLGHZDONVWKDW DUHDW OHDVWIWLQ HYHU\ KRUL]RQWDO GLPHQVLRQDQG DWOHDVWVILQ DUHD 6ZLQJ6LJQV 0D[ 1RWDOORZHG 1RWDOORZHG SHUSURSHUW\IURQWDJH SHUSURSHUW\ IURQWDJH 0D[6LJQ $UHD 1$ 1$ VILQFOXGLQJULGHUV VILQFOXGLQJ ULGHUV ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg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ork Session Packet Pg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ork Session Packet Pg. 33 Abandoned sign(s) shall be removed by the person or entity owning or having possession of the property. (S) :LQGRZ6LJQV (1) Nonilluminated window signs of no more than six (6) square feet are exempt from permit requirements when the total area of all window signs fills less than twenty-five (25) percent of the area of the architecturally distinct window in which they are situated, or when the total area of all window signs does not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the total allowable sign area for the premises. (2) Illuminated window signs, regardless of size, require a sign permit, and the area of such signs shall be calculated as part of, and be limited by, the total allowable sign area for the premises. (3) The area of window signs not exempt from permit requirements shall be calculated as a part of, and be limited by, the total allowable sign area for the premises. (4) Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, the maximum total area of all window signs in an architecturally distinct window shall not exceed eighty (80) square feet, nor shall window signs cover more than fifty (50) percent of the area of the window in which they are located. (5) No window sign shall exceed seven (7) feet in height. 3.8.7.2 - Temporary Signs ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg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ll signs shall be maintained in good structural condition at all times. All signs, including sign structures and sign faces, shall be kept neatly painted, including all metal parts and supports that are not galvanized or of rust-resistant metals, and in a general state of good repair. For the purposes of this Section, good repair shall mean that there are no loose, broken or severely weathered portions of the sign structure or sign face. The Director may inspect any sign governed by this Division and shall have authority to order the painting, repair, alteration or removal of a sign which constitutes a hazard to safety, health or public welfare by reason of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation or obsolescence. (2) Permanent signs shall be engineered to withstand a wind load of thirty (30) pounds per square foot. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 28 0D[LPXP KHLJKWDERYH JUDGH IHHW 0D[LPXPVL]H DOORZHGSHU VLGH VTXDUH IHHW DQGPRUH (2) The maximum size for ground and freestanding signs shall be ninety (90) square feet per side. The maximum height for freestanding signs shall be eighteen (18) feet above grade. The maximum height for ground signs shall be twelve (12) feet above grade. No freestanding or ground sign shall be built within fifteen (15) feet of any interior side lot line. The minimum horizontal distance between freestanding or ground signs located on the same lot shall be seventy-five (75) feet. (3) The maximum combined sign area of all faces of a freestanding or ground sign shall be two (2) times the maximum sign area allowed per side, based on setback. Any limitation imposed under this Article on the size of the face of a sign shall also apply to the entire side of the sign. (4) The required setback of any freestanding or ground sign shall be measured from the street right- of-way line of the street frontage which is the basis for the allotment of such sign. Any such setback shall be measured perpendicularly from the street right-of-way line to the nearest portion of the sign face or structure. (5) When a freestanding or ground sign is placed on a lot with two (2) or more street frontages, such sign shall be said to abut a particular street frontage when it is located closer to that street frontage than any other street frontage. (6) No more than one (1) permanent freestanding or ground sign per street frontage shall be permitted for any property or group of properties that were planned or developed with shared pedestrian or vehicle access. No permanent freestanding or ground sign shall contain more than three (3) cabinets or modules. (7) If a lot has more than one (1) street frontage, the freestanding or ground sign permitted for each frontage must abut the street frontage which is the basis for the allotment of such sign. (8) The sign face of a single face sign must be most nearly parallel to the abutting street frontage. The sign faces of a multi-face sign must be most nearly perpendicular to the abutting street frontage. (9) A drive through use, when located on a lot with frontage on only one (1) street, shall be permitted one (1) additional freestanding or ground that is physically oriented to the drive through lane. Such sign shall not exceed five (5) feet in height and thirty-five (35) square feet in area and shall be limited to one (1) face. Fifty (50) percent of the square footage of such sign shall be exempted from the total allowed for the property. (10) A drive-in use shall be permitted up to eight (8) square feet of signage at each drive-in station (including but not limited to menu boards, signs affixed to gasoline pumps, etc.), provided that the ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 25 0D[LPXP KHLJKWDERYH JUDGH IHHW 0D[LPXPVL]H DOORZHGSHUVLGH VTXDUHIHHW DQGPRUH ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 24 7\SHRIVWUHHW <GLVWDQFHV IHHW ;GLVWDQFHV IHHW 6DIHVLJKWGLVWDQFH IHHW $UWHULDO 5LJKW /HIW &ROOHFWRU 5LJKW /HIW /RFDO 5LJKW /HIW ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 23 0D[LPXPQXPEHURI VLJQVSHUPLWWHGSHU VWUHHWIURQWDJH 0D[LPXP KHLJKW $OO,QVWLWXWLRQDO%XVLQHVVDQG &RPPHUFLDO8VHV1RW2WKHUZLVH 6SHFLILHGLQWKLV7DEOH 3ULPDU\VI 3ULPDU\ 3ULPDU\ IW &RQYHQLHQFH6KRSSLQJ&HQWHU 3ULPDU\VI 3ULPDU\ 3ULPDU\ IW 1HLJKERUKRRG6HUYLFH&HQWHU 1HLJKERUKRRG&RPPHUFLDO 'LVWULFW 3ULPDU\VI 6HFRQGDU\VI 3ULPDU\ 6HFRQGDU\ 3ULPDU\ IW 6HFRQGDU\ IW (5) Freestanding signs shall be permitted only if constructed with a supporting sign structure, the width of which exceeds seventy (70) percent of the width of the sign face. Freestanding or ground signs shall contain no more than two (2) faces. No freestanding or ground sign shall be located less than seventy-five (75) feet from any directly abutting property which contains an existing or approved residential use or is zoned for residential use. For the purposes of this subsection, the term DSSURYHG shall mean having current project development plan or final plan approval. (6) All supporting sign structures of a freestanding or ground sign shall match the primary finish and colors of the associated building(s). (7) All signs which are greater than four (4) square feet in area, except ground signs individual letter signs or cabinet signs wherein only the letters are illuminated. (8) The maximum size of flush wall cabinets or individual letters shall be as follows: ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 21 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 17 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 14 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 13 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 11 8WLOLWLHVDQG7UDIILF0LQLPXPGLPHQVLRQ UHTXLUHPHQWVIRUWUHHXWLOLW\DQGWUDIILFFRQWUROGHYLFH VHSDUDWLRQVZLWKWKHH[FHSWLRQQRWHGLQ$SSHQGL[$ $SSHQGL[$ 6WUHHWV6WUHHWVFDSHV$OOH\V$QG(DVHPHQWV±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±38'0DVWHU3ODQ ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Work Session Packet Pg. 5 SURSRVHGDQGDSSURYHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK/DQG8VH&RGH'LYLVLRQZKLFKPDVWHU SODQZLOOGLUHFWDQGJXLGHVXEVHTXHQWSURMHFWGHYHORSPHQWSODQVDQGILQDOSODQVWKHUHLQ 7KH0RQWDYD±38'0DVWHU3ODQLQFOXGHVWKHIROORZLQJGRFXPHQWV 7KLV38'0DVWHU3ODQ6XPPDU\ 0RQWDYD38'0DVWHU3ODQ38''HVLJQ1DUUDWLYH 6KHHWVWKURXJKRIWKH0RQWDYD±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ork Session Packet Pg. 3