Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/12/2017 - Landmark Preservation Commission - Agenda - Work SessionMeg Dunn, Chair City Council Chambers Per Hogestad, Vice Chair City Hall West Doug Ernest 300 Laporte Avenue Bud Frick Fort Collins, Colorado Kristin Gensmer Dave Lingle Mollie Simpson Alexandra Wallace Belinda Zink Work Session July 12, 2017 5:30 PM • CALL TO ORDER • ROLL CALL • REVIEW OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 19, 2017 AT 5:30 P.M. IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 21, 2017 REGULAR MEETING. 2. 1201 WESTWARD DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY APPEAL • POLICY AND LEGISLATION o Historic Preservation Code Advisory Committee o Demolition/Alteration Form Review • BOARD TOPICS o None • OTHER BUSINESS • ADJOURNMENT Landmark Preservation Commission Roll Call – Work Session Landmark Preservation Commission Date: 7/12/17 Dunn X Ernest X Frick excused Gensmer excused Hogestad X Lingle X Simpson X Wallace X Zink X Agenda Item 1 Item # 1 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 12, 2017 Landmark Preservation Commission STAFF Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner SUBJECT HISTORIC PRESERVATION CODE ADVISORY COMMITTEE UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff will provide an update on the progress of the Historic Preservation Code Advisory Committee. 2.1 Packet Pg. 2 Agenda Item 2 Item # 2 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 12, 2017 Landmark Preservation Commission STAFF Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planner SUBJECT Demolition/Alteration Form Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to discuss the improved demolition/alteration review application and further improve on clarity and detail. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Historic Preservation Staff has identified clarity and process improvement opportunities for the current demolition/alteration review application based on issues that emerged through continuous use of the same form for the last several years. While the current form and the revised form outline and reflect the exact same evaluation and review process, the current form lacks sufficient detail to engender consistent confidence in rendered decisions. The revised form better reflects its basis in Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code, federal preservation guidelines, and City values of Excellence and Outstanding Service. Applicants submit the form to seek decisions from the CDNS Director and Chair of the Landmark Preservation Commission regarding the effect of proposed alterations or demolition on properties that are more than 50 years old, and to seek a determination of local landmark eligibility for properties in the same category. The demolition/alteration review form plays a pivotal role in weekly review meetings and establishes an important public record for a property; therefore the desired outcomes for this form review process are 1) more rigorous, defensible decisions and 2) a more substantive record of property condition and historic status for property owners and City staff. ATTACHMENTS 1. Demo-Alt Review Overview (PDF) 2. Request Form CURRENT (PDF) 3. Request Form REVISED (PDF) 2.2 Packet Pg. 3 Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 970.224.6134- fax fcgov.com Planning, Development & Transportation Demolition/Alteration Review Process Why a Review? The historic review process is designed to help prevent the loss of Fort Collins’ significant historic resources and to help preserve our city’s special character. The review is required when a permit is sought for exterior changes to any building or structure 50 years or older. While a part of the review involves evaluating the building’s potential for recognition as a Fort Collins Landmark, the review does not designate a property as a Landmark; instead, it identifies the relevant codes and processes the proposed changes would require. The review also provides an opportunity for citizens to comment on change in their community and for owners to learn about the substantial financial incentives available for eligible historic resources. The code provisions regulating the historic review process are contained in Section 14-72 of the Fort Collins Municipal Code, https://www.municode.com/library/co/fort_collins/codes/municipal_code. How Long Will This Take? The initial review (Steps 1 & 2) takes no longer than two weeks. Relatively few projects require a Final Hearing with the Landmark Preservation Commission (Step 4), but if needed, the Final Hearing has a minimum 30 days’ public posting/notice requirement. Step 1: How Do I Get Started? You will need to provide the following, either via email to cbumgarner@fcgov.com; by mail, addressed to Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Division, City of Fort Collins, P.O. Box 580, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80525; or dropped off at the Development Review Counter at 281 North College Avenue: 1. The property address and your contact information. 2. Photographs of the exterior of all sides of all buildings and structures on the property – take as many as needed to really show the condition and character of the building(s), and please label each with a caption, e.g. “north side of garage.” 3. For context, also provide photographs of just the fronts of the buildings on adjacent properties, with labeled to identify their location (e.g. “100 Main St”). 4. Provide a good narrative explaining the proposed work, or drawings, sketches, or plans. 5. Submit a Request for Historic Review form, signed by either the property owner or authorized owner’s agent. Step 2: What Happens Next? The review begins with an evaluation of the extent of the proposed work and effect that the work could have on your building’s historic character, which is assessed as either “major” or “minor.” This evaluation is completed by the Chair of the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) and the Director of Community Development and Neighborhood Services (CDNS). If the 2.2.a Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: Demo-Alt Review Overview (5716 : Demolition/Alteration Form Review) -2- Chair and Director determine that only “minor” alterations will be involved, you are finished with the historic review process. If it is determined that “major” exterior alterations will take place (or if the proposed work is unspecified or unknown), then your property is also evaluated for its potential to qualify for future recognition as a Fort Collins Landmark. Your property will fall into one of these three categories of Fort Collins Landmark eligibility: A. Not Eligible Your building or structure has limited historical or architectural significance, or has endured numerous exterior changes, or both. If it is Not Eligible, then, following the posting (and assuming no appeal), you are finished with this process. B. Contributing Your building or structure retains enough architectural integrity and historic character to contribute to a group of similar resources (a district), but is not typically eligible for landmark designation on its own. If your building is Contributing, then, following the posting (and assuming no appeal), you are finished with this process. C. Individually Eligible Your building or structure has significance and has substantially retained its architectural integrity. The property may have had some alterations, but these do not compromise its historic significance. You will need to meet further requirements, discussed below. The Chair’s and Director’s determinations of the eligibility of the property and of the effect of the proposed work take no longer than two weeks to complete. The property is then posted for fourteen days to inform the public that a review has occurred, and to allow for any appeals of either or both of the determinations to be filed. Unless changed on appeal, the determination that the proposed work is “major,” and/or the determination of the building’s eligibility remain in effect for five years. Step 3: What Happens If My Property is Individually Eligible and the Work is Major? If the CDNS Director and LPC Chair determine that the proposed alterations are major and that your property is individually eligible for Landmark recognition, then with approval from both the owner and the LPC Chair, the application may be forwarded to a Design Subcommittee of the Landmark Preservation Commission. Otherwise, the application proceeds to a public hearing of the LPC. Design Subcommittee: This is an opportunity for you to meet with Landmark Preservation Commission members to discuss design alternatives. The goal is to identify a design or a solution that meets the codes, and that is acceptable to all parties of the Design Subcommittee. If the new plans are agreed upon by all, then the new plans are approved, and you are finished with the Historic Review. If a mutually acceptable solution is not successfully reached, then your application proceeds to a public hearing. 2.2.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: Demo-Alt Review Overview (5716 : Demolition/Alteration Form Review) -3- Step 4: The Public Hearing The Landmark Preservation Commission conducts a public hearing to provide the opportunity for citizen comments, to confirm that the requirements for documentation of the property and for public notification have been met, and to hear and consider all relevant information. The Demolition/Alteration Review items will be put on the consent agenda. The LPC can then either approve the consent agenda or pull the application to approve with conditions or it may postpone the application for up to 45 days, during which time it may recommend that City Council consider protecting the property through landmark designation. The public hearing has specific requirements, which must be met before the public hearing is scheduled: x Complete plans, fully approved by all other departments; x A Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form, completed by a Commission-approved professional. This form can be found at www.historycolorado.org – look for form 1403. x A $250 fee x Notice mailed by the City to every property within 800’ of your structure (fee of .75 cents for each notice mailed—contact staff to begin this process and determine total amount owed). x Detailed contextual elevations of how the property would look after the proposed work, showing adjacent properties. x A Plan of Protection, if the work might cause damage to other historic resources. Once all the required information has been submitted, a minimum of 30 days is required for public notification before the hearing can take place. Appeals Either or both of the determinations made by the LPC Chair and CDNS Director, or made by the Design Review Subcommittee, may be appealed to the LPC by any citizen of Fort Collins, by filing an appeal with the CDNS Director within 14 days of the date of the decision(s). The process is described in Municipal Code Section 14-72(e): https://www.municode.com/library/co/fort_collins/codes/municipal_code. All final decision of the LPC may also be appealed to the City Council. It is important to be aware that no new information may be considered by Council, so be sure to provide any relevant information at the LPC public hearing. 2.2.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: Demo-Alt Review Overview (5716 : Demolition/Alteration Form Review) -4- Financial Incentive Programs: If a property is individually eligible for Landmark designation, the owner may decide to have it officially recognized as a Fort Collins Landmark, and take advantage of substantial financial benefits. Designation of a property does not mean that it cannot be renovated or added onto, as long as the work is compatible to the historic building. To ensure that a designated property's historic character is retained, plans are reviewed using the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines, http://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/tps/standguide/index.htm. The Financial Incentives include: ƒ Design Assistance Program. This assistance, available regardless of the building’s age or eligibility for designation, pays for up to $2,000 each year, for the design of alterations, additions, or new construction located in the Old Town Neighborhoods (roughly, north of Prospect, and between Taft and Lemay). The owner selects from the Design Assistance Program Consultant’s Master List, and the design must meet the city’s building codes and the historic rehabilitation standards. http://www.fcgov.com/historicpreservation/applications.php ƒ Colorado State Tax Credits. Receive back 20% of all approved costs, in the form of a dollar-for-dollar state income tax credit, for work on both the interior and exterior of designated resources. Any unused credit may be carried forward for ten years. http://www.coloradohistory-oahp.org/crforms/crforms3.htm ƒ Landmark Rehabilitation Zero % Interest Loans. The City provides matching funds of up to $7,500 each year for approved exterior work. The no-interest loan amounts are paid back only when the property is sold. The loan program is competitive, so actual funding will depend upon the quantity and quality of applications received that round. http://www.fcgov.com/historicpreservation/applications.php ƒ State Historic Fund Grants. Owners of designated properties in Fort Collins may receive grants of 25% of qualified expenditures, for projects involving the stabilization, restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or acquisition of a designated property or site. The project needs to show a public benefit. http://www.coloradohistory-oahp.org/crforms/crforms3.htm ƒ Historic Structure Assessment Grants. Grants of up to $15,000, to thoroughly document the structural condition of a building or structure and evaluate requirements for an intended use. http://www.coloradohistory-oahp.org/crforms/crforms3.htm ƒ Colorado Historical Foundation Loans. Below market, fixed rate loans. Loans typically require minimal down payments and have flexible repayment terms. Loans of less than $100,000 or over $750,000 are considered only under unusual circumstances. ƒ Federal Tax Credits. Additional 20% federal tax credit, for the substantial rehabilitation of historic buildings utilized for income-producing purposes (including rental properties). 10% federal tax credit for the substantial rehabilitation of non-residential buildings, not eligible for designation but located within a designated historic district. These credits are in addition to the 20% State Tax Credit. http://www.coloradohistory- oahp.org/crforms/crforms3.htm ƒ Free Professional Advice and Free Assistance Preparing Applications. Complimentary, 2.2.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: Demo-Alt Review Overview (5716 : Demolition/Alteration Form Review) -5- no-obligation consultations may be arranged with architects, preservation contractors and structural engineers, to provide expert advice on design and construction issues affecting historic buildings. Additionally, Preservation staff is available to provide advice on preparing applications for the various financial programs. ƒ Other financial programs which may also be used for historic preservation projects include: Downtown Development Authority Facade Funds http://www.downtownfortcollins.org/ Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) http://www.fcgov.com/affordablehousing/cdbg.php Local Development Company Low-Interest Loans http://www.fcldc.com/history.html Affordable Housing Tax Credits http://www.fcgov.com/affordablehousing/ 2.2.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: Demo-Alt Review Overview (5716 : Demolition/Alteration Form Review) Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 Request for Historic Review of Landmark Eligibility and/or Effect of Proposed Demolition or Alteration Property Address:_____________________________________________________________________________ Specific building(s) under review: _________________________________________________________________ Applicant:____________________________________________________________________________________ Phone:__________________________________Email:_______________________________________________ Detailed description of proposed work:____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ CERTIFICATION I certify the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge, consent, and authority of the owners of the real property, as those terms are defined in Section 1-2 of the City Code (including common areas legally connected to or associated with the property which is the subject of this application). Pursuant to said authority, I hereby permit City officials to enter upon the property for the purpose of exterior inspection, photographs, and if necessary, for posting of public notice on the property. *Owner/Applicant signature (required):_________________________________ Date:_______________________ Landmark Significance Criteria: A: A property that is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our local, state or national history; B: A property that is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; C: A property that embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; is the work of a master; possesses high artistic value; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; D: A property that has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Aspects of Integrity Criteria: Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred. Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan space, structure, and style of a property. Setting is the physical environment of a historic property. Whereas location refers to the specific place where a property was built or an event occurred, setting refers to the character of the place. It involves how, not just where, the property is situated and its relationship to the surrounding features and open space. Materials are the physical elements that form a historic property. Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. It is the evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering a building, structure, or site. Feeling is a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period or time. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property's historic character. Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property. A property retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. 2.2.b Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: Request Form CURRENT (5716 : Demolition/Alteration Form Review) (For Office Use Only) Date Materials Received:________________ Yes ƑƑProperty Ƒ No Ƒ Information Property is is on 50 the years State or older? or National Source/Register Date of or Construction:is within a State ____or __National _______Historic _______District? _______________ Site Number:____________ District:_____________________________________________________ Yes No Director of CDNS Ƒ Ƒ More than one aspect of integrity is being affected? (If yes, it is a major alteration; if no, minor) Design Workmanship Materials Setting Location Association Feeling Ƒ Ƒ Property has significance and is eligible for individual Landmark designation? Comments:_________________________________________________________________ Ƒ Ƒ Property retains a preponderance of architectural integrity? Comments:_________________________________________________________________ Ƒ Ƒ Proposed plans would uphold the property’s significance, integrity and eligibility? Comments:_________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ CDNS Director’s Signature: ______________________________________________ Date:____________ Yes No LPC Chair Ƒ Ƒ More than one aspect of integrity is being affected? (If yes, it is a major alteration; if no, minor) Design Workmanship Materials Setting Location Association Feeling Ƒ Ƒ Property has significance and is eligible for individual Landmark designation? Comments:_________________________________________________________________ Ƒ Ƒ Property retains a preponderance of architectural integrity? Comments:_________________________________________________________________ Ƒ Ƒ Proposed plans would uphold the property’s significance, integrity and eligibility? Comments:_________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ LPC Chair’s Signature: __________________________________________________ Date:____________ 2.2.b Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: Request Form CURRENT (5716 : Demolition/Alteration Form Review) Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 Request for Historic Review of Landmark Eligibility and/or Effect of Proposed Demolition or Alteration Property Address:_____________________________________________________________________________ Specific building(s) under review: _________________________________________________________________ Applicant:____________________________________________________________________________________ Phone:__________________________________Email:_______________________________________________ Detailed description of proposed work (attach plans, sketches, and photos to illustrate*): ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ *Note: Requested review will be conducted only when all requested attachments are completed and received. CERTIFICATION I certify the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge, consent, and authority of the owners of the real property, as those terms are defined in Section 1-2 of the City Code (including common areas legally connected to or associated with the property which is the subject of this application). Pursuant to said authority, I hereby permit City officials to enter upon the property for the purpose of exterior inspection, photographs, and if necessary, for posting of public notice on the property. Owner/Applicant signature (required):_________________________________ Date:_______________________ (For Office Use Only) Date Materials Received:________________ Yes ƑƑProperty No Information is 50 years or older? Source/Date of Construction:___________________________________ Ƒ Ƒ Property is on the State or National Register or is within a State or National Historic District? Site Number:____________ District:_____________________________________________________ 2.2.c Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: Request Form REVISED (5716 : Demolition/Alteration Form Review) Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 (For Office Use Only) Request for Historic Review: I. Effect of Proposed Demolition or Alteration and/or II. Fort Collins Landmark Eligibility Property Address: _____________________________________________________________________________ Specific building(s) under review: _________________________________________________________________ Summary of proposed work: _____________________________________________________________________ I. Effect of Proposed Demolition or Alteration Properties change over time and few retain all of their original historic physical features or characteristics. For a property to maintain historic character when alterations are made to the structure(s) or site, it must retain the essential physical features that enable it to convey that character through seven aspects of physical integrity that are used to evaluate historic properties throughout the United States. Unless requested by the owner, a determination of eligibility (Section 2) is not required for proposed work that is determined to be minor in Section 1. A checkmark signifies a loss of that aspect of integrity. Aspects of Integrity Criteria: CDNS LPC ܆ ܆Materials: The proposed work would result in the loss of a significant portion of historic exterior materials (cladding, roof, windows, other: __________________________________________________________________) ܆ ܆Design: The proposed work would result in the loss of historic exterior features (configuration, proportions, roofline, window pattern, historic addition(s), other: _______________________________________). ܆܆Workmanship: The proposed work would destroy evidence of historic construction techniques (joinery, carving, turning, etc.) that exemplify local, regional, or national applications of historic practices and aesthetics. ܆܆Location: The proposed work would remove historic structure(s) from the original site or a site the structure has occupied for more than 50 years. ܆ ܆Setting: The proposed work would significantly alter the physical character of the site that is similar to the historic period of construction and the site’s relationship to surrounding features. ܆ ܆Feeling: The proposed work would significantly alter the majority of intact, historic physical features (design, materials, workmanship, setting) that together convey historic character. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support a determination that eligibility would be lost.) ܆ ܆Association: The proposed work would remove historic structure(s) from the place where an associated historic event/activity occurred and affect the ability of the site to convey that history. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support a determination that eligibility would be lost.) Comments regarding differentiation and reversibility of proposed work: ___________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Yes No Director of CDNS Ƒ Ƒ More than one aspect of integrity is being affected? (If yes, it is a major alteration; if no, minor) Comments:_________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ CDNS Director’s Signature: ______________________________________________ Date:____________ Yes No LPC Chair Ƒ Ƒ More than one aspect of integrity is being affected? (If yes, it is a major alteration; if no, minor) Comments:_______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ LPC Chair’s Signature: __________________________________________________ Date:____________ 2.2.c Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: Request Form REVISED (5716 : Demolition/Alteration Form Review) Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 (For Office Use Only) Property Address:_____________________________________________________________________________ Specific building(s) under review: _________________________________________________________________ II. Fort Collins Landmark Eligibility A property must meet at least one of four criteria for significance to be eligible for Fort Collins landmark designation: association with significant historical events (A), with a significant person (B), for architectural design/significance (C), and/or for potential to yield important archeological data (D). The property must also retain enough exterior integrity to convey its significance. The National Register of Historic Places provides guidance for the criteria, aspects of integrity, and process that federal, state, and local entities use to identify and designate historic resources.0F 1 A checkmark signifies significance in that area. HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE ܆A: Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our local, state or national history; and/or ܆B: Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. Comments:__________________________________________________________________________________ Relevant Aspects of Exterior Integrity for Standards A and B: A basic integrity test for a property associated with an important event (Standard A) or person (Standard B) is whether a historical contemporary would recognize the property as it exists today. Such a property ideally might retain some features of all seven aspects of integrity, but the four aspects in bold are particularly important for a property in this category. A checkmark signifies the property retains that aspect of integrity. CDNS LPC ܆ ܆Location: The building is on its original site or was moved to the current site more than 50 years ago. ܆ ܆Setting: The physical character of the property site and its relationship to surrounding features is similar to the historic period ܆܆Materials: The property retains most of its historic exterior materials and they are visible (cladding, roof, windows, other: ________________) ܆ ܆Design: Most of the basic features (configuration, proportions, roofline, window pattern, historic addition(s), other: __________) are intact. ܆ ܆Workmanship: There is evidence of historic construction techniques, such as joinery, carving, turning, that exemplify local, regional, or national applications of historic practices and aesthetics) ܆ ܆Feeling: The majority of physical features (design, materials, workmanship, setting) that together convey historic character are intact. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support eligibility.) ܆ ܆Association: The property is the place where the historic event or activity occurs and still conveys that relationship to an observer. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support eligibility.) District Consideration: Yes No Ƒ Ƒ If not eligible for individual designation, does the property have enough significance and integrity to contribute to a potential future historic district? 1 U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (National Register Bulletin 15, 1990, revised for Internet, 2002); Fort Collins Municipal Code Section 14-5, “Standards for determining the eligibility of sites, structures, objects, and districts for designation as Fort Collins landmarks or landmark districts,” (Code 1972, § 69-6; Ord. No. 186, 2002, § 4, 1-7-03; Ord. 057, 2014 , § 1, 4-15-14). 2.2.c Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: Request Form REVISED (5716 : Demolition/Alteration Form Review) Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740      (For Office Use Only) ܆C: Architectural significance: ܆܆Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction ܆Property is the work of a master craftsman or architect; ܆Property possesses high artistic values or design concepts Justification: _________________________________________________________________________________ Relevant Aspects of Exterior Integrity for Standard C: A property significant for its architecture must retain those physical features that characterize the type, period, or method of construction the property represents. The aspects in bold are particularly important for a property in this category. A checkmark signifies the property retains that aspect of integrity. CDNS LPC ܆܆Materials: The property retains most of its historic exterior materials and they are visible (cladding, roof, windows, other: ______________________________________________________________________________) ܆܆Design: Most of the basic features (configuration, proportions, roofline, window pattern, historic addition(s), other: ______________________________________________________________________________) are intact. ܆܆Workmanship: There is evidence of historic construction techniques, such as joinery, carving, turning, that exemplify local, regional, or national applications of historic practices and aesthetics) ܆܆Location: The building is on its original site or was moved to the current site more than 50 years ago. ܆܆Setting: The physical character of the property site and its relationship to surrounding features is similar to the historic period ܆܆Feeling: The majority of physical features (design, materials, workmanship, setting) that together convey historic character are intact. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support eligibility.) ܆܆Association: The property is the place where the historic event or activity occurs and still conveys that relationship to an observer. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support eligibility.) Comments regarding current exterior integrity: ______________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Context: The photographs of adjacent parcels submitted with this application indicate the following information about the current contextual area for the property in question: __________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ District Consideration: Yes No Ƒ Ƒ Does the property have enough significance and integrity to contribute to a potential future historic district? 2.2.c Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: Request Form REVISED (5716 : Demolition/Alteration Form Review) Planning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 (For Office Use Only)  ܆D: A property that has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Comment: __________________________________________________________________________ Relevant Aspects of Exterior Integrity for Standard D: For properties eligible due to their potential to provide data that addresses important research questions, which includes archeological sites and standing structures studied for their information potential, the aspects below are most relevant. Two of the seven aspects, setting and feeling, typically do not have direct bearing for this standard of eligibility. A checkmark signifies the property retains that aspect of integrity. CDNS LPC ܆܆Location: The prehistoric and historic archeological remains on the property are in their original, relatively undisturbed location. ܆܆Materials: The property contains probable or known prehistoric floral or faunal remains or prehistoric and/or historic cultural material that is important for research study. ܆܆Design: The property contains prehistoric and historic cultural material that may yield important data on design technology. ܆܆Workmanship: The property contains prehistoric and historic cultural material that may yield important data on techniques that exemplify prehistoric or historic practices and aesthetics. ܆܆Association: The material remains on the property are relatively undisturbed and retain their association with other material that yields datable information. ܆܆Setting: The physical character of the property site and its relationship to surrounding features is similar to the prehistoric or historic period ܆܆Feeling: The majority of physical features (design, materials, workmanship, setting) that together convey historic character are intact. (Because this relies on perception, it must be combined with other aspects of integrity to support eligibility.) Yes No Director of CDNS Ƒ Ƒ Property has significance and is eligible for individual Fort Collins landmark designation? Justification: _________________________________________________________________________________ Ƒ Ƒ Proposed plans would uphold the property’s significance, integrity and eligibility? Justification: _________________________________________________________________________________ CDNS Director’s Signature: ________________________________________________ Date: ____________ Yes No LPC Chair Ƒ Ƒ Property has significance and is eligible for individual Fort Collins landmark designation? Justification: _________________________________________________________________________________ Ƒ Ƒ Proposed plans would uphold the property’s significance, integrity and eligibility? Justification: _________________________________________________________________________________ LPC Chair’s Signature: _____________________________________________________ Date: _____________ 2.2.c Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Request Form REVISED (5716 : Demolition/Alteration Form Review) 7/12/2017 1 1 Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission 07.12.2017 Demolition/Alteration Review Forms Case Study 2 • Address: 134-136 N. Sherwood St. • Construction Date: c. 1900 • Assumption: eligible under Standard C for Architecture 1906 Sanborn Map 7/12/2017 2 134-136 N. Sherwood 1968 134-136 N. Sherwood 7/12/2017 3 134-136 N. Sherwood 6 Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission 07.12.2017 Demolition/Alteration Review Forms