The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05/12/2016 - Zoning Board Of Appeals - Agenda - Regular MeetingHeidi Shuff, Chair Daphne Bear, Vice Chair Bob Long John McCoy Ralph Shields Butch Stockover Karen Szelei-Jackson Council Liaison: Bob Overbeck Staff Liaison: Noah Beals LOCATION: City Council Chambers 300 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. REGULAR MEETING MAY 12, 2016 8:30 AM • CALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL • CITIZEN PARTICIPATION (Items Not on the Agenda) • APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS • APPEALS FOR VARIANCE TO THE LAND USE CODE 1. APPEAL ZBA160006 Address: 903 Stover Street Owners: Kurt Reschenberg & Tia Molander Petitioner: Dick Anderson, Architect Zoning District: N-C-M Code Section: 4.8(E)(3) Project Description: This variance was tabled from the April 14, 2016 ZBA meeting. The variance request is to allow a 287 square foot addition to the rear of the existing primary structure to encroach 1.5 feet into the required 5 foot side-yard setback. The existing structure encroaches 2 feet into the same side-yard setback. 2. APPEAL ZBA160009 Address: 224 N. Grant Avenue Petitioner/Owner: Albert Baird Zoning District: N-C-M Code Section: 4.8(D)(3) and 4.8(D)(5) Project Description: The variance request is to allow a 384 square foot addition to an accessory building. An accessory building is limited to 600 square feet and the existing accessory building is 960 square feet. Additionally, in the rear half of the lot, the maximum allowable square footage is 1306 square feet. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AGENDA Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 May 12, 2016 With the proposed addition, the square footage would total 1344 square feet; exceeding the maximum allowable by 38 square feet. 3. APPEAL ZBA160010 - Address: 1608 Mathews Street - WITHDRAWN 4. APPEAL ZBA160011 Address: 300 W. Oak Street Petitioner: Schlosser Signs, Inc. Zoning District: D (Downtown District) Code Section: 3.8.7(G)(1), 3.8.7(G)(12), 3.8.7(M)4)(d), 3.8.7(M)(4)(h) 3.8.7(D)(6), 3.8.7(D)(5), and 3.8.7(I) Project Description: The request is to replace all the existing Electronic Message Centers on the Property. This request will require the following variances: (1) Allow a freestanding sign on the west side 11.75' in height to be setback 0' from the property line; freestanding signs over 10' in height are required to be setback 10'; (2) Allow a freestanding sign setback 0' feet to have 29sf of sign area per face; the maximum allowed sign area per face at a 0' setback is 20sf; (3) Allow a freestanding sign on the west side to have 72% of free air space; the maximum free air space is 30%; (4) Allow 2 Electronic Message Center signs to be 100% of the sign area; Electronic Message Centers are limited to 50% of sign area; (5) Allow 2 Electronic Message Center signs to face the same street; only 1 Electronic Message Center may face an abutting street; (6) Allow the square footage of signage on the south side to be 499.01sf.; only 400sf. is allowed on the south side; (7) Allow the total square footage for the property to be 1150.54sf.; only 970sf. is allowed on the total property. (8) Allow a Flush Wall sign to be 9.25’ in height’ the maximum height allowed is 7’. 5. APPEAL ZBA160012 Address: 4725 Venturi Lane Petitioner/Owner: Cory Beal Zoning District: U-E Code Section: 4.2(D)(2)(d) Project Description: The variance request would allow an addition to the garage to encroach 8 feet into the required 20 feet side-yard setback. 6. APPEAL ZBA160013 Address: 1121 Maple Street Petitioner/Owner: Elliot Dale Zoning District: L-M-N Code Section: 3.5.2(E)(3) and 3.8.19(A)(6) Project Description: The variance request would allow a new detached garage to be built 5 feet into the required 8 feet rear-yard setback, leaving a 3 foot setback from the structure to the property line. Additionally, the variance request would allow the eave to setback 2 feet from the property; the permitted setback distance for the eave is 5.5 feet. • OTHER BUSINESS • ADJOURNMENT Agenda Item 2 Item # 2 - Page 1 STAFF REPORT May 12, 2016 STAFF Ali van Deutekom, Zoning Inspector Noah Beals, Senior City Planner/Zoning PROJECT APPEAL # ZBA160009 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Address: 224 N. Grant Avenue Petitioner/Owner: Albert Baird Zoning District: N-C-M Code Section: 4.8(D)(3) and 4.8(D)(5) Variance Request: The variance request is to allow a 384 sf addition to an accessory building. An accessory building is limited to 600 sf and the existing accessory building is 960 sf. Additionally, in the rear half of the lot, the maximum allowable square footage is 1306 sf. With the proposed addition, the square footage would total 1344 sf; exceeding the maximum allowable by 38 square feet. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of an addition to the detached garage with the condition that it does not exceed the allowable floor area in the rear half of the lot. STAFF COMMENTS: 1. Background: The property was annexed into the City as part of the West Side Addition in 1887. The primary structure was built in 1951 and the garage was built in 1987. The garage was permitted for 960 sf in 1987 prior to Land Use Code changes restricting the size of accessory structure. 2. Applicant’s statement of justification: See petitioner’s letter. 3. Staff Conclusion and Findings: Under Section 2.10.2(H), Staff recommends approval of an addition to the existing detached accessory structure with the condition it does not exceed the allowable floor area in the rear of half of the lot and finds: • The variance request is not detrimental to the public good • More than 1 accessory building can be built on a lot • There is not a setback distance from accessory building on a lot Therefore, the variance request meets the standard of the code equally well has plan that would comply the standard, provided the allowable floor area does not exceed the maximum floor area on the rear half of the lot. 4. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of APPEAL# ZBA160009 with the condition that the addition does not exceed the allowable floor area on the rear half of the lot. Application Request IRU9DULDQFHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGH The Zoning Board of Appeals has been granted the authority to approve variancesIURPWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRI $UWLFOHVDQGRIWKH/DQG8VH&RGH7KH=RQLQJ%RDUGRI$SSHDOVVKDOOQRWDXWKRUL]HDQ\XVHLQD]RQLQJGLVWULFW RWKHUWKDQWKRVHXVHVZKLFKDUHVSHFLILFDOO\SHUPLWWHGLQWKH]RQLQJGLVWULFW7KH%RDUGPD\JUDQWYDULDQFHVZKHUHLW ILQGVWKDWWKHPRGLILFDWLRQRIWKHVWDQGDUGwould not be detrimental to the public good$GGLWLRQDOO\WKHYDULDQFH UHTXHVWPXVWPHHWDWOHDVWRQHRIWKHIROORZLQJMXVWLILFDWLRQUHDVRQV 7'-7" 5" 8'-0" 6'-0" 24'-0" 14'-10" 9'-2" 16'-0" 7'-1" 5'-4" 8'-0" 2'-6" 24'-0" 8" 3'-2" 5'-0" 3'-0" 6'-8" 2'-6" 8'-0" 11 1/4" 4" ALBERT BAIRD RESIDENCE SCALE 1 8"= 1' GARAGE EXPANSION 224 N. GRANT AVE. FORT COLLINS CO 80521 SCALE 3 4"=1' GARAGE EXPANSION 384 SQ. FEET FLOOR PLAN FRONT VIEW WALL SECTION AND FOUNDATION MARCH-11-2016 DRAWN BY ALBERT BAIRD EXISTING GARAGE NEW ADDITION 384 SQ. FT Existing 24' x 40' Garage new 16' x 24 garage addition CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1 2X4WOODFRAMING8'HIGHWITH 1 2" OSB SHEATHING WITH TREATED WOOD BOTTOM PLATE WITH 1 2" X 8" ANCHOR BOLTS 4' ON CENTER EMBEDDED IN NEW CONCRETE 1 1 1 1 WITH 2 X 4 WOOD FRAMING 9' HIGH WITH 2' ENGINEERED WOOD TRUSSES 24' LONG 2' ON CENTER WITH2X4WOODFRAMING9'HIGHWITH2' ENGINEERED WOOD TRUSSES 24' LONG 2' ON CENTER 2 2 2 2 Agenda Item 4 Item # 4 - Page 1 STAFF REPORT May 12, 2016 STAFF Ali van Deutekom, Zoning Inspector Noah Beals, Senior City Planner/Zoning PROJECT APPEAL # ZBA160011 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Address: 300 W. Oak Street Petitioner: Schlosser Signs, Inc. Zoning District: D (Downtown District) Code Section: 3.8.7(G)(1), 3.8.7(G)(12), 3.8.7(M)4)(d), 3.8.7(M)(4)(h), 3.8.7(D)(6), 3.8.7(D)(5), and 3.8.7(I) Variance Request: The request is to replace all the existing Electronic Message Centers on the Property. This request will require the following variances: • (1) Allow a freestanding sign on the west side 11.75' in height to be setback 0' from the property line; freestanding signs over 10' in height are required to be setback 10'; • (2) Allow a freestanding sign setback 0' feet to have 29sf of sign area per face; the maximum allowed sign area per face at a 0' setback is 20sf; • (3) Allow a freestanding sign on the west side to have 72% of free air space; the maximum free air space is 30%; • (4) Allow 2 Electronic Message Center signs to be 100% of the sign area; Electronic Message Centers are limited to 50% of sign area; • (5) Allow 2 Electronic Message Center signs to face the same street; only 1 Electronic Message Center may face an abutting street; • (6) Allow the square footage of signage on the south side to be 499.01sf; only 400sf is allowed on the south side; • (7) Allow the total square footage for the property to be 1150.54sf; only 970sf is allowed on the total property; • (8) Allow 2 flush wall signs to exceed 7ft in height. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the following variance requests with the conditions that the Electronic Message Centers on the building only display the time, date and temperature and do not exceed 7ft in height: • Allow 2 Electronic Message Center signs to face the same street • Allow the square footage of signage on the south side to be 499.01, exceeding the maximum 400sf • Allow the square footage of signage for the property to be 1150.54sf. exceeding the maximum 970sf • Allow 2 Electronic Message Center signs to be 100% of the sign area Staff further recommends denial of the following variance requests: • Allow a freestanding sign on the west side to exceed the height limits for a 0’ setback from the property line. • Allow a freestanding sign setback 0’ to exceed the minimum square footage of sign allowance per face • Allow a freestanding sign to exceed the maximum allowed free air space • Allow a Flush-wall sign to exceed 7ft in height. Agenda Item 4 Item # 4 - Page 2 STAFF COMMENTS: 1. Background: This property was developed approximately in 1970. The Electronic Message Center signs were permitted through the City at the same time. At that time the sign regulations were different. Current sign regulations limits have made the existing signs Non-conforming. Further, there has been some confusion about the total sign allowance. The property has at least two different addresses. This has led to the allowance of an increased sign area above the maximum. 2. Applicant’s statement of justification: See petitioner’s letter. 3. Staff Conclusion and Findings: Under Section 2.10.2(H), Staff recommends approval of the following variance request with the condition that the Electronic Message Centers on the building only display the time, date and temperature: • Allow 2 Electronic Message Center signs to face the same street. • Allow the square footage of signage on the south side to be 499.01sf, exceeding the maximum 400sf. • Allow the square footage of signage for the property to be 1150.54sf, exceeding the maximum 970sf. • Allow 2 Electronic Message Center signs to be 100% of the sign area Staff finds these 4 variance requests with the condition are: ♦ Not detrimental to the public good ♦ The existing Electronic Message Center signs have been displayed for 30 years ♦ The display is limited to time, date and temperature ♦ The vertical distance between the two Electronic Message Centers facing the same street is approximately 100ft Therefore, these variance requests will not diverge from the standard but in a nominal, inconsequential way, when considered in the context of the neighborhood, and will continue to advance the purpose of the Land Use Code contained in Section 1.2.2 Staff further recommends denial of the following variance requests: • Allow a freestanding sign on the west side to exceed height limits for a 0’ setback from the property line • Allow a freestanding sign setback 0’ to exceed the minimum square footage of sign allowance per face • Allow a freestanding sign to exceed the maximum allowed free air space • Allow a flush-wall sign to exceed 7ft in height. Staff concludes that there is insufficient evidence to approve the requests for these 5 variances and finds the request would be detrimental to the public good. 4. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of 4 of the requests and denial of 4 of the requests of APPEAL# ZBA160011. To Whom It May Concern: It is our intent to ask the City of Fort Collins Zoning Board of Appeals, to allow Key Bank to retro fit the EMC time and temperature units located on and around the building at 300 West Oak St, to LED. These displays will not advertise any business or product; only display the time and temperature to the citizens of Fort Collins. We are asking the board to consider a variance to the current code section (M), to not deem these as signs. The existing time and temperature units are currently not listed on the Sign Survey Report supplied to us by the City of Fort Collins. According to the survey the sign allowance is, at this time, over 102.29 sq ft. for signage. The existing larger units are 226.62 sq ft per unit, and are displayed on the North and South Elevations near the top of the building. The smaller units are 13.09 sq ft per unit and are displayed on the lower “awning type” entrance way facing Oak (South) and Howes (East). The proposed retro fit will be a like for like change to what already exists. We are not proposing an increase in size, nor a change of location. The LED units are state of the art and use very little energy to power them. Platte River Power Authority (PRPA) has already approved a substantial energy rebate for this project. The representatives of Key Bank feel that these Time and Temp units on the building have become a landmark for the residents of Fort Collins. We feel that these proposed EMC cabinets will affect the current code in an inconsequential way. These units will not display any advertisement, only the time and the temperature. These units have been a part of Fort Collins since the 1970’s; the retro fit will only improve what is currently there. Sincerely, Nicole Vatrano Schlosser Signs, Inc. 3597 Draft Horse Ct Loveland, Co 80538 970-593-1334 Nicole M Vatrano Existing Time & Temp cabinets Agenda Item 5 Item # 5 - Page 1 STAFF REPORT May 12, 2016 STAFF Ali van Deutekom, Zoning Inspector Noah Beals, Senior City Planner/Zoning PROJECT APPEAL # ZBA160012 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Address: 4725 Venturi Lane Petitioner/Owner: Cory Beal Zoning District: U-E Code Section: 4.2(D)(2)(d) Variance Request: The variance request would allow an addition to the garage to encroach 8ft into the required 20ft side-yard setback. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request to allow an addition to the garage to encroach 8ft into the required 20ft side-yard setback. STAFF COMMENTS: 1. Background: This property was platted in the County in 1968. The house was built approximately in 1971 and permitted by the County. This subdivision was not annexed into the City until 2008. Upon the annexation this subdivision was Zoned U-E. The U-E setbacks are different than the setbacks that were allowed by the County. There are other non-conforming structures in this subdivision. 2. Applicant’s statement of justification: See petitioner’s letter. 3. Staff Conclusion and Findings: Under Section 2.10.2(H), Staff recommends approval to allow an 8ft encroachment and finds: • Setback standards have changed upon annexation into the City of Fort Collins • The lot size is approximately 270sf less than the minimum lot size for the U-E zone district • Other buildings in the subdivision are at a 10ft side-setback or less Therefore, these variance requests will not diverge from the standard but in a nominal, inconsequential way, when considered in the context of the neighborhood, and will continue to advance the purpose of the Land Use Code contained in Section 1.2.2 4. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of APPEAL# ZBA160012 Agenda Item 6 Item # 6 - Page 1 STAFF REPORT May 12, 2016 STAFF Ali van Deutekom, Zoning Inspector Noah Beals, Senior City Planner/Zoning PROJECT APPEAL # ZBA160013 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Address: 1121 Maple Street Petitioner: Elliot Dale Zoning District: L-M-N Code Section: 3.5.2(E)(3) and 3.8.19(A)(6) Variance Request: The variance request would allow a new detached garage to be built 5 feet into the required 8 feet rear-yard setback, leaving a 3 foot setback from the structure to the property line. Additionally, the variance request would allow the eave to setback 2 feet from the property; the permitted setback distance for the eave is 5.5 feet. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a 5ft encroachment into the rear-yard setback and to allow the eave to be 2ft from the property line. STAFF COMMENTS: 1. Background: The property is zoned L-M-N, which requires an 8ft rear setback. This setback is for residential structures that are not a multi-family residential. The opposite side of rear property line is shared by a multi-family dwelling. 2. Applicant’s statement of justification: See petitioner’s letter. 3. Staff Conclusion and Findings: Under Section 2.10.2(H), Staff recommends approval of the 5ft encroachment of a new detached accessory structure and eave setback of 2ft and finds: • The rear property line is shared by a multi-family dwelling use that has a drive aisle abutting the property line. • The other properties along Maple have structures that are encroaching into their rear-yard setback. • The proposed structure is not over the allowed square footage for an accessory building Therefore, these variance requests will not diverge from the standard but in a nominal, inconsequential way, when considered in the context of the neighborhood, and will continue to advance the purpose of the Land Use Code contained in Section 1.2.2 4. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of APPEAL# ZBA160013 Application Request IRU9DULDQFHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGH The Zoning Board of Appeals has been granted the authority to approve variancesIURPWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRI $UWLFOHVDQGRIWKH/DQG8VH&RGH7KH=RQLQJ%RDUGRI$SSHDOVVKDOOQRWDXWKRUL]HDQ\XVHLQD]RQLQJGLVWULFW RWKHUWKDQWKRVHXVHVZKLFKDUHVSHFLILFDOO\SHUPLWWHGLQWKH]RQLQJGLVWULFW7KH%RDUGPD\JUDQWYDULDQFHVZKHUHLW ILQGVWKDWWKHPRGLILFDWLRQRIWKHVWDQGDUGwould not be detrimental to the public good$GGLWLRQDOO\WKHYDULDQFH UHTXHVWPXVWPHHWDWOHDVWRQHRIWKHIROORZLQJMXVWLILFDWLRQUHDVRQV E\UHDVRQRIH[FHSWLRQDOSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVRURWKHUH[WUDRUGLQDU\DQGH[FHSWLRQDOVLWXDWLRQVXQLTXHWRWKH SURSHUW\LQFOXGLQJEXWQRWOLPLWHGWRSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVVXFKDVH[FHSWLRQDOQDUURZQHVVVKDOORZQHVVRU WRSRJUDSK\WKHVWULFWDSSOLFDWLRQRIWKHFRGHUHTXLUHPHQWVZRXOGUHVXOWLQXQXVXDODQGH[FHSWLRQDOSUDFWLFDO GLIILFXOWLHVRUXQGXHKDUGVKLSXSRQWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQWRIWKHSURSHUW\SURYLGHGWKDWVXFKGLIILFXOWLHVRU hardshipDUHQRWFDXVHGE\DQDFWRURPLVVLRQRIWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQW LHQRWVHOILPSRVHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOSURPRWHWKHJHQHUDOSXUSRVHRIWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHGequally well or better thanZRXOGDSURSRVDOZKLFKFRPSOLHVZLWKWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOQRWGLYHUJHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGHVWDQGDUGVH[FHSWLQDnominal, inconsequential way ZKHQFRQVLGHUHGLQWKHFRQWH[WRIWKHQHLJKERUKRRG This application is only for a variance to the Land Use Code. Building Code requirements will be determined and reviewed by the Building Department separately. When a building or sign permit is required for any work for which a variance has been granted, the permit must be obtained within 6 months of the date that the variance was granted. +RZHYHUIRUJRRGFDXVHVKRZQE\WKHDSSOLFDQWWKH=RQLQJ%RDUGRI$SSHDOVPD\FRQVLGHUDRQHWLPHPRQWK H[WHQVLRQLIUHDVRQDEOHDQGQHFHVVDU\XQGHUWKHIDFWVDQGFLUFXPVWDQFHVRIWKHFDVH$QH[WHQVLRQUHTXHVWPXVW EHVXEPLWWHGEHIRUHPRQWKVIURPWKHGDWHWKDWWKHYDULDQFHZDVJUDQWHGKDVODSVHG Petitioner or Petitioner’s Representative must be present at the meeting Location/D3RUWH$YH&RXQFLO&KDPEHUV)RUW&ROOLQV&2 Date6HFRQG7KXUVGD\RIWKHPRQWK7LPHDP Variance Address Petitioner’s Name, if not the Owner City )RUW&ROOLQV&2 Petitioner’s Relationship to the Owner is Zip Code Petitioner’s Address Owner’s Name Petitioner’s Phone # Code Section(s) Petitioner’s Email Zoning District Additional Representative’s Name Justification(s) Representative’s Address Justification(s) Representative’s Phone # Justification(s) Representative’s Email Reasoning Date ___________________________________ Signature __________________________________________ If not enough room, additional written information may be submitted 1121 Maple St 80521 Elliot Dale LMN We are seeking a reduced set back of 3 feet on the south side of our lot for the construction of a new, detached garage. Due to the shallowness of our lot, the garage protrudes unnecessarily forward, causing difficulty for 2 cars to use the driveway. Additionally, the south side of our lot borders a driveway/parking lot which is used most similarly to an alley-way. Our proposed set back is nominal and inconsequential to the neighborhood given the context of this current use. 4/15/2016 1. Hardship 3. Nominal and inconsequential Additional Justification ? ' ? ' ? ' ? *' ! ! ! ! %)$))& &))#$( # ) = < 8 ? ' ? ' ? ' %)$))& &))#$( # ! ! ) >= 9&9 >? ' -? -' ? ' ? +' %)$))& &))#$( %)$))& &))#$( # # ! ! ) ++ = 2 7' 1" OPENING IN EXISTING NON BEARING WALL 8' HIGH WITH 2-12" LVL BEAMS WITH 2 TRIMMER STUDS ON EACH END OF HEADER TO CONCRETE 3 3 UNDERGROUND PVC PLUMBING TO PLUMBING CODE FOR FUTURE RESTROOM 4 4 NEW ENGINEERED 24' WOOD TRUSSES TOP PLATE TO TOP PLATE 4/ 12 PITCH ROOF 2' ON CENTER WITH 5 8" OSB SHEATING 5 5 5 ALL HEADERS OVER DOORS AND WINDOWS ARE 2- 2" X 12" WITH DOUBLE TRIMMERS 6 6 6 NEW ADDITION WILL HAVE 12" HARDY BOARD LAP SIDING TO MATCH BUILDING WITH TYVEK OVER 1 2" OSB SHEATHING 7 7 7 7 8 8 EXISTING ELECTRICAL PANEL CONCRETE FOUNDATION EXISTING GRADE CONCRETE FOUNDATION IS A MONOLITHIC SLAB WITHA8"WIDEX30"BELOWGRADEWITH4#4REBAR ROOFING TO BE ASPHALT SHINGLES TO BUILDING CODE WITH 30# FELT TAR PAPER AND CLASS A SHINGLES 9 9 1 10 2" OSB ROOF SHEATHING ON ROOF TRUSSES WITH CLIPS EVERY 1' 10 11FACED ALL NEW WALLS WITH R-13 INSULATION WITH PAPER 11 11 11 11 ELECTRIC NOTES: GFI NEW 12O V OUTLET TO EXISTING PANEL S S S S S ELECTRIC SWITCHES FOR LIGHTS L L L L 1' X 4' T-8 LIGHT FIXTURE E\UHDVRQRIH[FHSWLRQDOSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVRURWKHUH[WUDRUGLQDU\DQGH[FHSWLRQDOVLWXDWLRQVXQLTXHWRWKH SURSHUW\LQFOXGLQJEXWQRWOLPLWHGWRSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVVXFKDVH[FHSWLRQDOQDUURZQHVVVKDOORZQHVVRU WRSRJUDSK\WKHVWULFWDSSOLFDWLRQRIWKHFRGHUHTXLUHPHQWVZRXOGUHVXOWLQXQXVXDODQGH[FHSWLRQDOSUDFWLFDO GLIILFXOWLHVRUXQGXHKDUGVKLSXSRQWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQWRIWKHSURSHUW\SURYLGHGWKDWVXFKGLIILFXOWLHVRU hardshipDUHQRWFDXVHGE\DQDFWRURPLVVLRQRIWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQW LHQRWVHOILPSRVHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOSURPRWHWKHJHQHUDOSXUSRVHRIWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHGequally well or better thanZRXOGDSURSRVDOZKLFKFRPSOLHVZLWKWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOQRWGLYHUJHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGHVWDQGDUGVH[FHSWLQDnominal, inconsequential way ZKHQFRQVLGHUHGLQWKHFRQWH[WRIWKHQHLJKERUKRRG This application is only for a variance to the Land Use Code. Building Code requirements will be determined and reviewed by the Building Department separately. When a building or sign permit is required for any work for which a variance has been granted, the permit must be obtained within 6 months of the date that the variance was granted. +RZHYHUIRUJRRGFDXVHVKRZQE\WKHDSSOLFDQWWKH=RQLQJ%RDUGRI$SSHDOVPD\FRQVLGHUDRQHWLPHPRQWK H[WHQVLRQLIUHDVRQDEOHDQGQHFHVVDU\XQGHUWKHIDFWVDQGFLUFXPVWDQFHVRIWKHFDVH$QH[WHQVLRQUHTXHVWPXVW EHVXEPLWWHGEHIRUHPRQWKVIURPWKHGDWHWKDWWKHYDULDQFHZDVJUDQWHGKDVODSVHG Petitioner or Petitioner’s Representative must be present at the meeting Location/D3RUWH$YH&RXQFLO&KDPEHUV)RUW&ROOLQV&2 Date6HFRQG7KXUVGD\RIWKHPRQWK7LPHDP Variance Address Petitioner’s Name, if not the Owner City )RUW&ROOLQV&2 Petitioner’s Relationship to the Owner is Zip Code Petitioner’s Address Owner’s Name Petitioner’s Phone # Code Section(s) Petitioner’s Email Zoning District Additional Representative’s Name Justification(s) Representative’s Address Justification(s) Representative’s Phone # Justification(s) Representative’s Email Reasoning Date ___________________________________ Signature __________________________________________ If not enough room, additional written information may be submitted 224 and 2241/2 N. Grant ave Albert R. Baird 80521 224 1/2 N. Grant ave Albert R. Baird 9760-567-0228 11 bairdbuilders@frii.com NCM- Neighborhood conservation medium I need to add to my garage because the need for more space , i have 3- cars in the garage including 224 n. grant tenants, and a pop up camper and i need more space for my personal workshop i spend a lot of my time in my shop working March-27-2016 2. Equal to or better than 2. Equal to or better than 2. Equal to or better than