The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/14/2017 - Planning And Zoning Board - Supplemental Documents - Citizen Letter Trail Head TownhomesCitizen Letter – Trail Head Townhomes From: vendor17@sigridco.com [mailto:vendor17@sigridco.com] Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2017 5:06 PM To: Sylvia Tatman-Burruss <statman-burruss@fcgov.com> Cc: Candy Marang <candyjean@sigridco.com>; Kara Marang <kara.marang@gmail.com>; Jonathan Luginbill <jonathan.luginbill@gmail.com> Subject: PDP 170035 Trail Head Tracts F&G Townhouse Ms Tatman-Burruss, Thank you for your notice of public meeting regarding the proposed development of tracts F & G in the Trail Head development. I represent the Marang Trust, owner of the property at 3303 Wagon Trail, and will not be able to attend the scheduled December 14 meeting. I offer my comments via email in leu of attendance. The Marang Trust is opposed to the development detailed in the “Concept Plan”, (sign number 369), found at: https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/pdf/neighborhood- mtgs/trail_head_townhomes_site_plan.pdf?1502481045 1. The proposed development appears to be ‘low density’ in name only. A reasonable person viewing the “Concept Plan”, packing 89 town home apartments into tracts F & G, would not conclude this is low density. Looking at the attached Fig1.png image, you will note that proposed building group C1 is very nearly the size of Lot 8 across the street, evincing a four to one dwelling ratio. 2. Potential excessive vehicle density. Each town home apartment is said to have a two car garage. Each resident of driving age is likely to have a vehicle. Not all of these potential vehicles will be of such size as to be able to be garaged and therefore parked on the street. 3. Potential excessive traffic on ancillary roads. The current “Concept Plan” indicates egress/ingress to tract F & G is to be from an extended Green Lake Drive. As currently proposed, Green Lake Drive would connect to Wagon Trail Road, Greenfields Drive, and Campfire Drive. Wagon Trail and Campfire are narrow streets and will not adequately accommodate the additional vehicle traffic especially during peak times. The Marang Trust recommends the following revisions to the “Concept Plan” for development of tracts F & G: 1. Reduce the dwelling density by a third to half. This will allow for additional parking, more green space and generally a better quality of life for the town home apartment residents and well as the existing Trail Head residents. Citizen Letter – Trail Head Townhomes 2. Configure engress/ingress to tracts F & G such that town home apartment residents have direct access to East Vine Drive as well as Greenfields Drive. Wagon Trail and Campfire are too narrow to safely accommodate the additional traffic. Tract F & G should not connect with either Wagon Trail or Campfire. Greenfield Drive is substantially wider and can easily accommodate additional traffic. The Marang Trust is opposed to the development of tracts F & G as detailed in the “Concept Plan”. Sincerely, Eric J. Marang Trustee Marang Trust Citizen Letter – Union on Elizabeth From: Ana Haro [mailto:jharo1976@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 1:18 PM To: Jason Holland <JHolland@fcgov.com> Subject: The Union on Elizabeth-1208 and 1220 West Elizabeth Avenue redevelopment project Mr. Holland, I am writing to express my support of the redevelopment proposal on 1208 and 1220 West Elizabeth Avenue for a five-story mixed use building. I believe this project will not only create much-needed rental housing, but as a small business owner at 1103 W. Elizabeth Avenue, this project will help businesses like mine to stay open in this area with continued success. Sincerely, Kiko and Jeanette Haro Owners Butters AM Eatery Citizen Email 2 – Union on Elizabeth Hi Jason, After last weeks meeting Christian and I would just like to again express our concern about the chronic under parking of multifamily projects in this corridor and throughout Fort Collins. We know first hand because we are now spending upwards of 15,000 dollars annually to control parking poachers from LoKal and the District in our properties at 1335 West Elizabeth and 1228- 1232 West Elizabeth street. We recognized that these enormous properties are pro forma driven REITs that have worldwide investors to keep happy but we, the residents and local investors of Fort Collins, have to live and work here long term and these types of projects cause our tenants real dollars. Many people have and will continue to say " but this only makes your property more valuable because some future developer can put 6-7 stories on it". We are those future developers and at best our redevelopment will be four stories and fully parked. Case in point is our Westpark property across the street at 1335 West Elizabeth- 2 stories(28 units) multi use with 112 parking spots and we STILL have complaints about our parking- but managing the poachers is now a full time job. We are also currently building 808 West Prospect which was originally approved at 4 stories, we down sized it to 3 stories in order to create less impact to the surrounding neighborhood and in order to OVER park the property. 61 units with 88 parking spots! It is doable, yes the numbers aren't as sexy, but it is doable. Instead of 6 million dollars a year in gross revenue perhaps EDR will only realize 4million but trust me, they can make it on that. Please understand, we have known Dino for years and this is a very hard place to be but 100 beds less is not going to kill this deal but 100 more cars without parking spots will have a terrible impact on this corridor and surrounding neighborhoods. Thank you your discretion regarding our input is appreciated. Best, Robin Bachelet, CCIM-- 970 566-2586 cel 970 484-0077 fax rbachelet@mac.com DELICH Union on Elizabeth TIS Addendum, December 2017 ASSOCIATES Using the long range (2035) total peak hour traffic shown in Figure 10, the West Elizabeth/Shields intersection operate as indicated on Table 2. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. The West Elizabeth/Shields intersection will meet the City of fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standard in the morning and afternoon peak hours, except the northbound left-turn movement in the afternoon peak hour. The long range (2035) operational analyses are used for planning and informational purposes only. It is concluded, based on the revised phasing at the West Elizabeth/Shields intersection, the West Elizabeth/Shields intersection will meet the Coty of Fort Collins Motor vehicle LOS standard in the short range (2022) future with the development of the Union on Elizabeth. Therefore, a variance request for the northbound left-turn movement at the West Elizabeth/Shields intersection is not required. It is respectfully requested that no further transportation analyses be required for the proposed Union on Elizabeth. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions or desire additional information. DELICH Union on Elizabeth TIS Addendum, December 2017 ASSOCIATES TABLE 1 Short Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM West Elizabeth/Shields (signal) EB LT E E EB T C D EB RT C D EB APPROACH D D WB LT D E WB T D D WB RT A A WB APPROACH B E NB LT C E NB T/RT C B NB APPROACH C C SB LT B C SB T C D SB RT B C SB APPROACH C D OVERALL C D TABLE 1 Long Range (2035) Total Peak Hour Operation (for Information Only) Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM West Elizabeth/Shields (signal) EB LT E E EB T C D EB RT C C EB APPROACH D D WB LT D E WB T D D WB RT D D WB APPROACH D D NB LT B F (150.7 secs) NB T/RT C C NB APPROACH C E SB LT B C SB T C E SB RT B C SB APPROACH C E OVERALL C E APPENDIX A HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Shields Street & Elizabeth Street short total am 2018 Total AM 10/19/2016 Synchro 9 Light Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 351 62 338 23 11 7 149 911 119 5 783 148 Future Volume (veh/h) 351 62 338 23 11 7 149 911 119 5 783 148 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 481 117 37 38 35 0 164 1215 137 12 842 70 Adj No. of Lanes 211211120121 Peak Hour Factor 0.73 0.53 0.76 0.61 0.31 0.44 0.91 0.75 0.83 0.42 0.93 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222 Cap, veh/h 548 492 422 156 280 238 361 1638 184 175 1628 717 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.26 0.26 0.05 0.15 0.00 0.07 0.51 0.51 0.01 0.46 0.46 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 1863 1198 3442 1863 1583 1774 3196 359 1774 3539 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 481 117 37 38 35 0 164 671 681 12 842 70 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1863 1198 1721 1863 1583 1774 1770 1785 1774 1770 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.0 5.4 2.3 1.2 1.8 0.0 5.1 32.7 33.1 0.4 18.5 2.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.0 5.4 2.3 1.2 1.8 0.0 5.1 32.7 33.1 0.4 18.5 2.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 548 492 422 156 280 238 361 907 915 175 1628 717 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.24 0.09 0.24 0.12 0.00 0.45 0.74 0.74 0.07 0.52 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 610 492 422 579 313 266 509 907 915 255 1628 717 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.2 31.8 25.4 50.7 40.5 0.0 15.2 21.0 21.1 18.8 21.0 16.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 12.8 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.9 5.4 5.5 0.2 1.2 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.1 2.8 0.8 0.6 0.9 0.0 2.5 17.2 17.7 0.2 9.3 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 58.0 32.0 25.5 51.5 40.6 0.0 16.1 26.4 26.6 19.0 22.2 17.1 LnGrp LOS E CCDD BCCBCB Approach Vol, veh/h 635 73 1516 924 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.3 46.3 25.4 21.8 Approach LOS DDCC Timer 12345678 Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.0 60.9 9.5 33.6 11.8 55.1 22.0 21.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 47.5 18.5 19.5 16.5 37.5 19.5 18.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 35.1 3.2 7.4 7.1 20.5 17.0 3.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.2 0.1 0.7 0.3 13.3 0.5 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 30.0 HCM 2010 LOS C Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 1: Shields Street & Elizabeth Street short total am 2018 Total AM 10/19/2016 Synchro 9 Light Report Page 2 Phase Number 12345678 Movement SBL NBTL WBL EBT NBL SBTL EBL WBT Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None Maximum Split (s) 11 52 23 24 21 42 24 23 Maximum Split (%) 10.0% 47.3% 20.9% 21.8% 19.1% 38.2% 21.8% 20.9% Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 11111111 Minimum Initial (s) 55555555 Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333 Minimum Gap (s) 33333333 Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000 Time To Reduce (s) 00000000 Walk Time (s) 7 7 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 89 100 42 65 89 0 42 66 End Time (s) 100 42 65 89 0 42 66 89 Yield/Force Off (s) 95.5 37.5 60.5 84.5 105.5 37.5 61.5 84.5 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 95.5 26.5 49.5 73.5 105.5 26.5 50.5 73.5 Local Start Time (s) 89 100 42 65 89 0 42 66 Local Yield (s) 95.5 37.5 60.5 84.5 105.5 37.5 61.5 84.5 Local Yield 170(s) 95.5 26.5 49.5 73.5 105.5 26.5 50.5 73.5 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 110 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Splits and Phases: 1: Shields Street & Elizabeth Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Shields Street & Elizabeth Street short total pm 2018 Total PM 5:00 pm 10/19/2016 Synchro 9 Light Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 345 43 401 89 63 11 397 1260 69 6 1146 427 Future Volume (veh/h) 345 43 401 89 63 11 397 1260 69 6 1146 427 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 411 57 415 101 66 0 451 1340 0 12 1219 83 Adj No. of Lanes 211211120121 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.75 0.76 0.88 0.96 0.62 0.88 0.94 0.91 0.50 0.94 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222 Cap, veh/h 468 401 538 162 235 200 457 2031 0 212 1328 581 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.13 0.00 0.21 0.57 0.00 0.01 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 1863 938 3442 1863 1583 1774 3632 0 1774 3539 1550 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 411 57 415 101 66 0 451 1340 0 12 1219 83 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1863 938 1721 1863 1583 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1550 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.1 3.0 25.8 3.5 3.9 0.0 25.0 31.2 0.0 0.5 39.4 4.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.1 3.0 25.8 3.5 3.9 0.0 25.0 31.2 0.0 0.5 39.4 4.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 468 401 538 162 235 200 457 2031 0 212 1328 581 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.14 0.77 0.62 0.28 0.00 0.99 0.66 0.00 0.06 0.92 0.14 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 502 401 538 502 287 244 457 2031 0 261 1328 581 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.9 38.1 32.9 56.1 47.5 0.0 36.3 17.5 0.0 22.8 35.7 24.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 15.5 0.2 6.8 3.9 0.6 0.0 38.7 1.7 0.0 0.1 11.6 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.7 1.6 13.3 1.7 2.0 0.0 19.8 15.6 0.0 0.2 21.3 1.9 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 66.4 38.3 39.6 60.0 48.1 0.0 75.0 19.2 0.0 22.9 47.3 25.3 LnGrp LOS E D D E D E B C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 883 167 1791 1314 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.0 55.3 33.3 45.7 Approach LOS D E C D Timer 12345678 Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.1 73.4 10.2 30.3 30.0 49.5 20.8 19.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 17.5 18.5 25.5 40.5 17.5 18.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.5 33.2 5.5 27.8 27.0 41.4 16.1 5.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 22.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 42.1 HCM 2010 LOS D Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 1: Shields Street & Elizabeth Street short total pm 2018 Total PM 5:00 pm 10/19/2016 Synchro 9 Light Report Page 2 Phase Number 12345678 Movement SBL NBTL WBL EBT NBL SBTL EBL WBT Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None Maximum Split (s) 9.5 65.5 22 23 30 45 22 23 Maximum Split (%) 7.9% 54.6% 18.3% 19.2% 25.0% 37.5% 18.3% 19.2% Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 11111111 Minimum Initial (s) 55555555 Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333 Minimum Gap (s) 33333333 Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000 Time To Reduce (s) 00000000 Walk Time (s) 7 7 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 90 99.5 45 67 90 0 45 67 End Time (s) 99.5 45 67 90 0 45 67 90 Yield/Force Off (s) 95 40.5 62.5 85.5 115.5 40.5 62.5 85.5 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 95 29.5 51.5 74.5 115.5 29.5 51.5 74.5 Local Start Time (s) 90 99.5 45 67 90 0 45 67 Local Yield (s) 95 40.5 62.5 85.5 115.5 40.5 62.5 85.5 Local Yield 170(s) 95 29.5 51.5 74.5 115.5 29.5 51.5 74.5 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Splits and Phases: 1: Shields Street & Elizabeth Street APPENDIX B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Shields Street & Elizabeth Street long total am 2018 Total AM 10/19/2016 Synchro 9 Light Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 405 70 380 25 10 10 170 1050 140 10 900 170 Future Volume (veh/h) 405 70 380 25 10 10 170 1050 140 10 900 170 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 426 74 74 26 11 4 179 1105 142 11 947 86 Adj No. of Lanes 211211120121 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222 Cap, veh/h 495 465 405 156 281 193 341 1661 213 209 1668 735 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.53 0.53 0.01 0.47 0.47 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 1863 1179 3442 1863 1277 1774 3143 403 1774 3539 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 426 74 74 26 11 4 179 621 626 11 947 86 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1863 1179 1721 1863 1277 1774 1770 1776 1774 1770 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.3 3.4 5.0 0.8 0.6 0.3 5.4 28.1 28.2 0.4 21.2 3.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.3 3.4 5.0 0.8 0.6 0.3 5.4 28.1 28.2 0.4 21.2 3.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 495 465 405 156 281 193 341 935 939 209 1668 735 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.04 0.02 0.52 0.66 0.67 0.05 0.57 0.12 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 579 465 405 579 313 215 483 935 939 275 1668 735 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.0 32.3 27.2 50.5 39.9 39.8 15.5 18.8 18.9 17.0 21.0 16.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.0 1.3 3.7 3.7 0.1 1.4 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.1 1.8 1.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 2.8 14.6 14.7 0.2 10.7 1.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.1 32.4 27.4 51.0 39.9 39.8 16.8 22.6 22.6 17.1 22.4 16.6 LnGrp LOS E CCDDDBCCBCB Approach Vol, veh/h 574 41 1426 1044 Approach Delay, s/veh 50.1 46.9 21.9 21.9 Approach LOS DDCC Timer 12345678 Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.9 62.6 9.5 31.9 12.2 56.4 20.3 21.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 49.5 18.5 18.5 16.5 38.5 18.5 18.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 30.2 2.8 7.0 7.4 23.2 15.3 2.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 14.7 0.0 0.5 0.3 12.2 0.5 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 27.4 HCM 2010 LOS C Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 1: Shields Street & Elizabeth Street long total am 2018 Total AM 10/19/2016 Synchro 9 Light Report Page 2 Phase Number 12345678 Movement SBL NBTL WBL EBT NBL SBTL EBL WBT Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None Maximum Split (s) 10 54 23 23 21 43 23 23 Maximum Split (%) 9.1% 49.1% 20.9% 20.9% 19.1% 39.1% 20.9% 20.9% Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 11111111 Minimum Initial (s) 55555555 Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333 Minimum Gap (s) 33333333 Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000 Time To Reduce (s) 00000000 Walk Time (s) 7 7 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 89 99 43 66 89 0 43 66 End Time (s) 99 43 66 89 0 43 66 89 Yield/Force Off (s) 94.5 38.5 61.5 84.5 105.5 38.5 61.5 84.5 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 94.5 27.5 50.5 73.5 105.5 27.5 50.5 73.5 Local Start Time (s) 89 99 43 66 89 0 43 66 Local Yield (s) 94.5 38.5 61.5 84.5 105.5 38.5 61.5 84.5 Local Yield 170(s) 94.5 27.5 50.5 73.5 105.5 27.5 50.5 73.5 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 110 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Splits and Phases: 1: Shields Street & Elizabeth Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Shields Street & Elizabeth Street long total pm 2018 Total PM 5:00 pm 10/19/2016 Synchro 9 Light Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 410 50 475 100 70 15 465 1450 80 10 1320 500 Future Volume (veh/h) 410 50 475 100 70 15 465 1450 80 10 1320 500 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 432 53 213 105 74 4 489 1526 81 11 1389 151 Adj No. of Lanes 211211120121 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222 Cap, veh/h 490 431 535 167 256 136 407 1902 101 144 1325 580 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.23 0.23 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.20 0.56 0.56 0.01 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 1863 974 3442 1863 991 1774 3413 180 1774 3539 1550 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 432 53 213 105 74 4 489 788 819 11 1389 151 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1863 974 1721 1863 991 1774 1770 1824 1774 1770 1550 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.8 2.7 19.2 3.6 4.3 0.4 23.5 42.6 43.3 0.5 44.9 8.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.8 2.7 19.2 3.6 4.3 0.4 23.5 42.6 43.3 0.5 44.9 8.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 490 431 535 167 256 136 407 986 1016 144 1325 580 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.12 0.40 0.63 0.29 0.03 1.20 0.80 0.81 0.08 1.05 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 531 431 535 531 287 153 407 986 1016 203 1325 580 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.5 36.5 25.2 56.0 46.5 44.8 39.2 21.2 21.3 24.6 37.5 26.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 15.1 0.1 0.5 3.9 0.6 0.1 111.5 6.7 6.8 0.2 38.5 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.0 1.4 5.2 1.8 2.2 0.1 26.1 22.6 23.5 0.2 29.0 3.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 65.6 36.6 25.7 59.9 47.1 44.9 150.7 27.9 28.2 24.9 76.0 27.1 LnGrp LOS E D C E D D F C C C F C Approach Vol, veh/h 698 183 2096 1551 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.2 54.4 56.7 70.9 Approach LOS D D E E Timer 12345678 Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.0 71.4 10.3 32.3 28.0 49.4 21.6 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 59.5 18.5 18.5 23.5 41.5 18.5 18.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.5 45.3 5.6 21.2 25.5 46.9 16.8 6.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 13.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 60.6 HCM 2010 LOS E Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 1: Shields Street & Elizabeth Street long total pm 2018 Total PM 5:00 pm 10/19/2016 Synchro 9 Light Report Page 2 Phase Number 12345678 Movement SBL NBTL WBL EBT NBL SBTL EBL WBT Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None Maximum Split (s) 10 64 23 23 28 46 23 23 Maximum Split (%) 8.3% 53.3% 19.2% 19.2% 23.3% 38.3% 19.2% 19.2% Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 11111111 Minimum Initial (s) 55555555 Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333 Minimum Gap (s) 33333333 Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000 Time To Reduce (s) 00000000 Walk Time (s) 7 7 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 92 102 46 69 92 0 46 69 End Time (s) 102 46 69 92 0 46 69 92 Yield/Force Off (s) 97.5 41.5 64.5 87.5 115.5 41.5 64.5 87.5 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 97.5 30.5 53.5 76.5 115.5 30.5 53.5 76.5 Local Start Time (s) 92 102 46 69 92 0 46 69 Local Yield (s) 97.5 41.5 64.5 87.5 115.5 41.5 64.5 87.5 Local Yield 170(s) 97.5 30.5 53.5 76.5 115.5 30.5 53.5 76.5 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Splits and Phases: 1: Shields Street & Elizabeth Street Community Development & Neighborhood Services Planning 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.221.6376 970.224.6111- fax MEMORANDUM To: Christine Macrina, Boards and Commissions Coordinator From: Cameron Gloss, Planning Manager Date: December 14, 2017 Re: 2017 Annual Report: Planning & Zoning Board Chair Jeff Schneider and Vice-Chair Jeff Hansen were elected in January. In 2017, the Planning and Zoning Board held 12 regular hearings, acting on an average of 4 items per meeting. The agendas ranged from one to seven items. The Board also held 11 work sessions. The Development Review agenda items for the year totaled: 4 Overall Development Plans; 18 Project Development Plans; 2 Additions of Permitted Use; 10 Modifications of Standard (to Project Development Plans); 2 Re-zonings; 6 Annexations totaling approximately 467 acres; 1 Major Amendment; 1 Site Plan Advisory Review; 1 Extension of Final Plan; and 2 Minor Amendments The Board provided recommendations to the City Council on the following items: • Various Revisions to the Land Use Code Relating to natural Resource Protection & Prairie Dog Management • Old Town Neighborhoods Plan and Design Guidelines • Downtown Plan • Revisions and Additions to the Land Use Code: o Seasonal Overflow Shelters o Increase to LMN Maximum acreage for Affordable Housing o Clarifications to the Change of Use Process o Add two-family attached housing type to LMN and MMN zones o Expand definitions for Group Homes o Add Basic Development Review explanation o Clarify pedestrian and bicycle connectivity standards o Adjust land area within multi-family development needed for a park, central feature of gathering space o Add fiber cement siding as an acceptable building material o Extent maximum allowable multi-family garage length o Add the bicycle share program as a demand management strategy o Remove exemptions for outdoor space in HMN development • Add single family residential as a permitted use on the Windsor side of I-25 within the Town of Windsor I-25/392 Design Standards • Interim Sign Code Update • Revisions and Additions to the Land Use Code for Reasonable Accommodations • Update to the Land Use Code related to Small Cell Wireless technology in the public right-of-way • City policy change to allow eligibility expansion for Affordable Housing Waivers • Lehman-Timberline Annexation and Zoning • Mail Creek Crossing Second Annexation and Zoning • Blehm-Homestead Enclave Annexation and Zoning • Interstate Land Holdings Annexation and Zoning • Newton First and Second Annexation and Zoning • Fox Hills Second Annexation and Zoning • Highway I-25 Third Annexation and Zoning • Spring Creek Rezone • 2017 Update to the 3 Mile Plan Planning and Zoning Board Decisions appealed to City Council: • Crown at Old Town North– Decision Upheld