Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/18/2017 - Landmark Preservation Commission - Agenda - Regular MeetingLandmark Preservation Commission Page 1 January 18, 2017 Doug Ernest, Acting Chair Meg Dunn City Council Chambers Bud Frick City Hall West Kristin Gensmer 300 Laporte Avenue Per Hogestad Fort Collins, Colorado Dave Lingle Mollie Simpson Alexandra Wallace Cablecast (delayed) on FCTV Channel 14 Belinda Zink and 881 (HD) on the Comcast cable system The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. Regular Meeting January 18, 2017 5:30 PM • CALL TO ORDER • ROLL CALL • STAFF REPORTS • AGENDA REVIEW o Staff Review of Agenda o Consent Agenda Review This Review provides an opportunity for the Commission and citizens to pull items from the Consent Agenda. Anyone may request an item on this calendar be “pulled” off the Consent Agenda and considered separately.  Commission-pulled Consent Agenda items will be considered before Discussion Items.  Citizen-pulled Consent Agenda items will be considered after Discussion Items. • PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA Landmark Preservation Commission City of Fort Collins Page 2 • CONSENT AGENDA 1. UCONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 14, 2016 REGULAR MEETING. The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the December 14, 2016 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. 2. U601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEUW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposal to alter the house located at 601 East Elizabeth Street with a front porch and front, shed dormer addition. The property was determined to be individually eligible as a Fort Collins Landmark. APPLICANT/OWNER: J. J. and Kathryn Hannah, 601 East Elizabeth Street • PULLED FROM CONSENT • DISCUSSION AGENDA 3. UDOWNTOWN PLAN The purpose of this item is to provide feedback and a recommendation to City Council regarding the potential adoption of the Fort Collins Downtown Plan. 4. UOLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS PLAN The purpose of this item is to provide feedback and a recommendation to City Council regarding the potential adoption of the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan. 5. UOLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS DESIGN GUIDELINES The purpose of this item is to provide feedback and a recommendation to City Council regarding the potential adoption of new Old Town Neighborhoods Design Guidelines. 6. UREVISIONS TO LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION BYLAWS • OTHER BUSINESS • ADJOURNMENT The Consent Agenda is intended to allow the Commission to spend its time and energy on the important items on a lengthy agenda. Staff recommends approval of the Consent Agenda. Anyone may request an item on this calendar to be "pulled" off the Consent Agenda and considered separately. Agenda items pulled from the Consent Agenda will be considered separately under Pulled Consent Items. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda will be approved by Commission with one vote. The Consent Agenda consists of: ● Approval of Minutes ● Items of no perceived controversy ● Routine administrative actions Roll Call and Voting Record Landmark Preservation Commission Date: 1/18/17 ROLL CALL Dunn Present Frick Present Gensmer Present Hogestad Present Lingle Present Simpson Present Wallace Present Zink Present Ernest Present VOTING RECORD Agenda Item: Consent Agenda Downtown Plan OTN Plan Dunn Yes Yes Yes Frick (Briefly stepped out) Yes Yes Gensmer Yes Yes Yes Hogestad Yes Yes Yes Lingle Yes Yes Yes Simpson Yes Yes Yes Wallace Yes Yes Yes Zink Yes Yes Yes Ernest Yes Yes Yes RESULTS: Approved 8:0 Approved 9:0 Approved 9:0 Agenda Item: OTN Design Guidelines Revisions to Bylaws Dunn Yes Yes Frick Yes Yes Gensmer Yes Yes Hogestad Yes Yes Lingle Yes Yes Simpson Yes Yes Wallace Yes Yes Zink Yes Yes Ernest Yes Yes RESULTS: Approved 9:0 Approved 9:0 Log of Packet Additions Landmark Preservation Commission Meeting Date: 1/118/17 All materials received after the packet was initially published, but prior to the hearing: Item # Rec’d Description Actions 4b 11/12/17 Planning Staff Presentation for Old Town Neighborhoods Plan Updated online packet 3a 11/17/17 Updated online packet Updated online packet 5a 11/18/17 Planning Staff Presentation for Old Town Neighborhoods Design Guidelines Plan Updated online packet Agenda Item 1 Item # 1 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY January 18, 2017 Landmark Preservation Commission STAFF Gretchen Schiager, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 14, 2016 REGULAR MEETING. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the December 14, 2016 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS 1. LPC December 14, 2016 Minutes - DRAFT (PDF) 1 Packet Pg. 3 City of Fort Collins Page 1 December 14, 2016 Doug Ernest, Acting Chair City Council Chambers Meg Dunn City Hall West Bud Frick 300 Laporte Avenue Kristin Gensmer Fort Collins, Colorado Per Hogestad Dave Lingle Cablecast on FCTV Channel 14 and Alexandra Wallace 881 (HD) on the Comcast cable system Belinda Zink The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. Regular Meeting December 14, 2016 Minutes • CALL TO ORDER Acting Chair Ernest called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. • ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dunn, Zink, Hogestad, Wallace, Gensmer, Ernest, Frick ABSENT: Lingle STAFF: McWilliams, Bzdek, Bumgarner, Yatabe, Schiager • AGENDA REVIEW No changes to posted agenda. • STAFF REPORTS Ms. McWilliams informed the Commission that the E. A. Schlichter House has officially been placed on the National Register of Historic Places. Ms. Dunn gave a brief report about an open house the Loveland Historic Preservation Commission hosted at the Pulliam Community Building. Landmark Preservation Commission 1.a Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: LPC December 14, 2016 Minutes - DRAFT (5127 : MINUTES OF DECEMBER 14, 2016) City of Fort Collins Page 2 December 14, 2016 • PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. • DISCUSSION AGENDA 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 9, 2016 REGULAR MEETING. The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the November 9, 2016 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. Ms. Dunn moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission approve the Minutes of the November 9, 2016 regular meeting as presented. Mr. Hogestad & Mr. Frick recused themselves having been absent from the November 9th meeting. Ms. Gensmer seconded. The motion passed 5-0. ITEMS 2-5, LANDMARK DESIGNATIONS [Secretary’s Note: Agenda Items #2-5, all Landmark Designation applications put forward by Housing Catalyst, were initially presented and discussed together, prior to being discussed and deliberated individually.] Staff Report Ms. Bumgarner presented a staff report covering all four properties under consideration, providing background on the properties and the basis for their designations. Applicant Presentation Darcy McClure, Project Manager for Housing Catalyst (formerly the Housing Authority), briefly addressed the Commission. She explained that Housing Catalyst is going through this process as required by HUD prior to selling the properties, as they are potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Staff Response Staff had no additional information. Public Input None Commission Questions and Discussion Acting Chair Ernest mentioned that all four of the properties had been rentals, which is important to the history of Fort Collins as a college town, which did not initially have dormitories. Ms. Wallace mentioned that these simple properties exemplify the historic community, and the fact that their integrity is intact elevates their eligibility. Mr. Hogestad asked for confirmation that all four properties were possibly eligible for the National Register, even with the modifications. Ms. McWilliams explained that one was found to be individually eligible, and the others were found to be contributing to larger historic districts. 1.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: LPC December 14, 2016 Minutes - DRAFT (5127 : MINUTES OF DECEMBER 14, 2016) City of Fort Collins Page 3 December 14, 2016 Mr. Hogestad questioned these buildings were really eligible from a design and materials standpoint, due to the significant modifications, specifically mentioning the garage door, awning and siding at 717 West Mulberry Street. Ms. Dunn said the modifications seemed to be easily reversible. Mr. Hogestad pointed out that the condition of the underlying materials was not known. Ms. McWilliams noted that staff had evaluated the properties in conjunction with inventories prepared by a consultant, and explained that there was a preponderance of integrity of materials, design, and each of the other aspects of integrity. She also pointed out that a property doesn’t have to meet all seven of the aspects of integrity in order to be eligible. Mr. Hogestad questioned whether materials should be included, but stated he could likely support the others. Acting Chair Ernest acknowledged there may not be a preponderance of integrity to support materials and workmanship, but stated that at least five aspects of integrity are in place, which would be enough to qualify. Mr. Hogestad also expressed concerns about setting since these properties weren’t originally set on four or eight-lane arterials, but stated there was still enough integrity under the other aspects to support designation. Acting Chair Ernest pointed out that most streets were originally gravel, so if the street materials and width were considered part of setting, few properties would meet that standard. Mr. Hogestad agreed that it is rare to have the setting preserved and suggested that is what makes setting special. Ms. Zink said there wasn’t much information presented about the setting of these properties, noting that the surrounding neighborhood is an important aspect of setting. Ms. Wallace commented that enough of the setting is preserved since these are still in a residential area, and added that the community is continually changing, so nothing would be in an untouched setting. Mr. Hogestad argued that Mountain Avenue as an example of an area where the setting has been preserved. He said he supports designating these properties, but thinks it important to specify that they do not meet all seven standards. Acting Chair Ernest suggested the motion-maker include whatever standards they wish, and then the vote would determine whether that was supported. Mr. Yatabe mentioned that the discussion so far had largely grouped all of the properties together, and suggested expressing specific concerns related to each individual property. 2. 717 - 717 1/2 WEST MULBERRY STREET - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council regarding landmark designation for The Wilhelm Property, a 1948 transitional ranch-style residence and attached garage at 717 and 717 ½ West Mulberry Street. OWNER/APPLICANT: Housing Authority of the City of Fort Collins 1715 W Mountain Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521 Commission Questions and Discussion – All properties Mr. Hogestad noted that his earlier comments about the garage and materials were specifically related to this property. Ms. Dunn stated there is a preponderance of original materials, and that with regard to setting, while the street had changed, the surrounding homes were largely intact. Commission Deliberation Ms. Dunn moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission pass a resolution recommending that City Council designate the Wilhelm Property at 717 and 717½ West Mulberry Street as a Fort Collins Landmark in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 14, based on the property’s significance under Standard C as an example of an early transitional ranch dwelling with good exterior integrity based on all seven aspects of integrity. Ms. Zink seconded. 1.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: LPC December 14, 2016 Minutes - DRAFT (5127 : MINUTES OF DECEMBER 14, 2016) City of Fort Collins Page 4 December 14, 2016 Mr. Hogestad stated he would not support the motion based on his earlier comments. Mr. Frick suggested a friendly amendment to remove the materials. Ms. Dunn would like to have a vote based on the current motion, arguing that if the siding were removed, the original materials would still be underneath. Mr. Hogestad said there’s no way of knowing whether the underlying materials are all intact. Ms. McWilliams explained that while the consultant’s report seemed to suggest that the original materials were intact, it did not address Mr. Hogestad’s specific concerns. She went on to suggest that the motion could be changed to remove the phrase “based on all seven aspects of integrity” at the end. Ms. Dunn agreed to that change, and Ms. Zink seconded. Mr. Hogestad said this discussion was important in order to ensure that the Commission is consistent and equitable about preservation issues. The motion passed 7:0. 1.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: LPC December 14, 2016 Minutes - DRAFT (5127 : MINUTES OF DECEMBER 14, 2016) City of Fort Collins Page 5 December 14, 2016 3. 701 MATHEWS - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council regarding landmark designation for The Schroeder/McMurry Property, a 1920 Craftsman-style bungalow and detached garage at 701 Mathews Street. OWNER/APPLICANT: Housing Authority of the City of Fort Collins 1715 W Mountain Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521 Commission Questions and Discussion The Members discussed possibilities as to the purpose of the chimney on the garage. Acting Chair Ernest mentioned that the involvement of Montezuma Fuller adds some significance under Standard B. Mr. Hogestad asked about the front entry and the parge coat on the foundation. Ms. McWilliams explained that the parge coat has likely been updated relatively recently. Mr. Hogestad commented that the entry piece looked out of place, and Mr. Frick suggested it may have been enclosed at some point. Mr. Hogestad added that it was a beautiful house with outstanding brick work. Ms. McWilliams drew the Commission’s attention to the 1948 assessor’s photo, which shows the entry substantially as it is now, other than the door. Ms. Zink said it also looked like the parge coat may have been in place at that time. Ms. Gensmer said it meets all seven aspects of integrity, adding that the questions about the entryway and the parge coat had addressed her concerns. Commission Deliberation Ms. Gensmer moved the Landmark Preservation Commission pass a resolution recommending that City Council designate the Schroeder/McMurry Property at 701 Mathews Street as a Fort Collins Landmark in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 14, based on the property’s significance under Standard B for its association with builder H. W. Schroeder and architect Montezuma Fuller; and Standard C as an excellent example of a Craftsman-style residence and its exterior integrity based on all seven aspects of integrity. Mr. Frick seconded. The motion passed 7-0. 4. 608 SOUTH GRANT AVENUE - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council regarding landmark designation for The Kimball Property, a 1924 bungalow-style residence 608 and 608 ½ South Grant Avenue. OWNER/APPLICANT: Housing Authority of the City of Fort Collins 1715 W Mountain Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521 Commission Questions and Discussion Acting Chair Ernest mentioned that this property also appeared to have synthetic siding. Mr. Hogestad commented that the stair and railing appeared to have been altered. Acting Chair Ernest mentioned the architecture, and noted the rear apartment from 1929. Members commented on how small the apartment looks from the outside. Commission Deliberation Ms. Dunn moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission pass a resolution recommending that City Council designate the Kimball Property at 608 and 608 ½ South Grant Avenue as a Fort Collins Landmark in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 14, based on the property’s significance under Standard C for its bungalow architectural style and its exterior integrity. Ms. Wallace seconded. The motion passed 7-0. 1.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: LPC December 14, 2016 Minutes - DRAFT (5127 : MINUTES OF DECEMBER 14, 2016) City of Fort Collins Page 6 December 14, 2016 5. 519 EAST MULBERRY STREET - APPLICATION FOR FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This item is to consider the request for a recommendation to City Council regarding landmark designation for The Howell Property, a 1908 hipped roof box type dwelling at 519 East Mulberry Street. OWNER/APPLICANT: Housing Authority of the City of Fort Collins 1715 W Mountain Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521 Commission Questions and Discussion Acting Chair Ernest commented about the siding and questioned whether it meets all aspects of exterior integrity. Ms. Dunn mentioned that Mulberry is quite different now. Mr. Hogestad agreed, adding that this house would have originally had a large yard. Mr. Hogestad asked if the siding was original, and Ms. McWilliams indicated that it was the same synthetic material the others had. Commission Deliberation Ms. Dunn moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission pass a resolution recommending that City Council designate the Howell Property at 519 East Mulberry Street as a Fort Collins Landmark in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 14, based on the property’s significance under Standard C and for its exterior integrity. Ms. Gensmer seconded. The motion passed 7-0. 6. THE STANDARD - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is seeking a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board regarding the proposed design for a student housing project on West Prospect Road and Lake Street, east of Shields Street. The 4.23 acre development is comprised of two predominately 5-story buildings, one (Building A) facing Prospect Road and the other (Building B) facing Lake Street. APPLICANT: Linda Ripley, Ripley Design, Inc. Mr. Hogestad recused himself due to residing within the notification area for this project. Mr. Frick said he had reviewed the videos of the discussions at the previous meetings had he missed and is prepared to participate. Staff Report Ms. McWilliams presented the staff report, including a slide presentation covering the background, role of the LPC, the criteria to be considered, the area of adjacency and a summary of recent design updates. Applicant Presentation Jay Silverman, Dwell Design Studio, introduced the Applicant team and gave a brief presentation. He quickly reviewed slides of the location, proposed site plan, aerial view and the design progression. He noted that the unit and bedroom count is slightly smaller now. He provided an overview of the recent changes to the height, setback and width. He described how the stepback and slope height plane requirements have been addressed on both buildings. Mr. Silverman talked about how the project and its design features meet the Land Use Code requirements in Section 3.4.7.F.2. He provided new perspectives of Building A, as requested previously by the Commission. He pointed out the changes to the exterior elevations of Building A, including modifications so that the parapets would not project into the slope height plane, modifications to the roof form, and the addition of more brick. 1.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: LPC December 14, 2016 Minutes - DRAFT (5127 : MINUTES OF DECEMBER 14, 2016) City of Fort Collins Page 7 December 14, 2016 Mr. Silverman discussed the changes to Building B with regard to a stepback on the side, and updates to the landscaping and streetscapes. Mr. Silverman described the materials to be used, referring to a materials board (a likeness of which was included in the packet). He talked about the proposed wall between the development and the church. Minor refinements have been made to the spacing of the piers to accommodate planning staff concerns. Mr. Silverman shared additional perspectives that provided the views from Sheely Drive across Prospect and from 730 W. Prospect, which showed The Slab’s privacy fence and tree screening for The Standard. Mr. Silverman said he believed they have addressed all of the Commission’s comments in the updated design. Public Input None Staff Response Staff had no further information. Commission Questions and Discussion Mr. Frick stated that the project was too massive and did not relate in any way to any of the historic properties. He said the design itself is good, but far too big for the historic context. Ms. Zink said the size complies with the zoning of the area. She commented that the stepbacks and setbacks helped, and that she liked the design. She stated she will support the project. Ms. Gensmer agrees that it is much larger than the surrounding buildings, but the additional setbacks, stepbacks and courtyards provide the necessary articulation to mitigate the size and comply with the Land Use Code. Ms. Wallace agrees that the project complies with 3.4.7 of the Land Use Code. Commission Deliberation Ms. Zink moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to the Decision Maker approval of The Standard Project Development Plan (PDP160035), finding it is in compliance with the standards contained in Land Use Code section 3.4.7 in regard to compatibility with the character of the project’s area of adjacency for the reasons stated in the staff report. Ms. Gensmer seconded. Ms. Dunn said this project represents a battle between the zoning and the historic buildings. While the project is bigger than they would like, the Applicant has complied with zoning requirements, and has made accommodations to make the project fit with the historic context as well as it can. Given the proximity to campus, it is the perfect location for this type of project. Acting Chair Ernest agreed with the prior comments, stating he will vote in favor of the motion. He stated that the project complies with 3.4.7.F in regards to scale and mass, design features, and building materials. He pointed out that 3.4.7.F.1 recognizes and accommodates a dissimilar height, setback and width, and stated that he believed those requirements had been met. Motion passed 5:1, with Mr. Frick dissenting. • OTHER BUSINESS None • ADJOURNMENT Acting Chair Ernest adjourned the meeting at 7:04 p.m. 1.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: LPC December 14, 2016 Minutes - DRAFT (5127 : MINUTES OF DECEMBER 14, 2016) City of Fort Collins Page 8 December 14, 2016 Minutes respectfully submitted by Gretchen Schiager. Minutes approved by a vote of the Commission on __________. __________________________ Doug Ernest, Acting Chair 1.a Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: LPC December 14, 2016 Minutes - DRAFT (5127 : MINUTES OF DECEMBER 14, 2016) Agenda Item 2 Item # 2 Page 1 STAFF REPORT January 18, 2017 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW STAFF Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposal to alter the house located at 601 East Elizabeth Street with a front porch and front, shed dormer addition. The property was determined to be individually eligible as a Fort Collins Landmark. APPLICANT/OWNER: J. J. and Kathryn Hannah, 601 East Elizabeth Street RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the applicants have submitted all required materials and recommend approval without conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND: The owners of the property located at 601 East Elizabeth, J. J. and Kathryn Hannah, are proposing to alter the residence with the addition of a front porch and shed dormer on the façade. In accordance with Fort Collins City Code Chapter 14, Landmark Preservation, the property was reviewed on February 25, 2016, and has officially been determined to be individually eligible for Fort Collins Landmark designation under criterion C, Design/Construction. The proposed work was determined to be major in scope. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY: This 1-story single family dwelling was constructed in 1940 in the Crafts Resubdivision of the Lake Park Addition to Fort Collins. The house is an example of the Cape Cod subtype of Minimal Traditional architecture (noted in accompanying documentation as Minimal Traditional). Virginia Savage McAlester refers to minimalist Cape Cods, such as the example at 601 East Elizabeth, as side-gabled roof Minimal Traditional dwellings. The Cape Cod and Minimal Traditional styles were both popular during the 1940s, although the Cape Cod subtype is rarer in Fort Collins. Cape Cods are a minimalist approach to Colonial Revival architecture and known for the steeply pitched roofs, nearly flush eaves, centered entrance with paneled door, and minimal ornamentation. Most Colorado Cape Cods were built between 1933 and 1956. More detailed architectural and historical information can be found in the attached Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form. PROPOSED ALTERATION: The applicant is proposing to add a front porch and shed dormer on the façade in accordance with the approved plans. PROCESS: Section 14-72 of the Municipal Code provides the process and requirements for the review of alterations or demolition of structures 50 years of age or older. Commonly referred to as demolition/alteration review, the process begins when the owner submits an application for City approval of the demolition or exterior alteration of the structure. Within fourteen (14) days of the filing of such application, the Director and the Chair of the Commission (or a designated member of the Commission appointed by the chair), determine if the proposed 2 Packet Pg. 12 Agenda Item 2 Item # 2 Page 2 work constitutes a demolition or a minor or major alteration of the exterior. If the work is determined to be a demolition or major alteration, the Director and the Chair refer the matter to either a subcommittee, or to the Commission for a hearing. Prior to the Commission meeting, public notice occurs, and there are submittal requirements that must be fulfilled: a. A Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form prepared by an approved expert in historic preservation; b. Detailed plans and specifications describing and depicting the appearance of the site, structure or object that is the subject of the application, in context, after the proposed alteration or demolition; c. Evidence that all administrative and quasi-judicial approvals necessary to accommodate the proposed demolition or alteration have been obtained; d. A plan of protection acceptable to the Commission showing how the applicant will ensure that no damage will occur to other historic resources on or adjacent to the site. e. Applicable fees FINDINGS: Staff has made the following findings of fact as it relates to this application:  The residence at 601 East Elizabeth is more than 50 years of age, dating to 1940;  The work proposed was determined to be “major,” affecting several aspects of integrity;  The residence at 601 East Elizabeth was determined to qualify for individual designation as a Fort Collins Landmark, for its architecture;  The applicant has complied with all of the applicable requirements. COMMISSION ACTION: At this demolition/alteration review hearing, the Commission shall approve the application for demolition (with or without conditions) unless such approval is postponed as described below. The LPC may impose conditions of approval requiring the property owner to provide the City with additional information to mitigate the loss caused by the demolition or alteration. Such conditions may include, but need not be limited to:  Comprehensive photographic documentation;  Comprehensive historical, developmental, social and/or architectural documentation of the property and the neighborhood containing the property; and/or  Any other mitigating solution agreed upon by the Commission, the applicant, and any other applicable parties. Alternatively, the Commission may postpone consideration of the application for a period not to exceed forty-five (45) days for additional information needed for its consideration, which information may include the opinion of the staff regarding the benefits to the City of landmark designation of the property. In the event that the Commission has not made a final decision within the forty-five-day period, then the Commission shall be deemed to have approved, without condition, the proposed work. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map (PDF) 2. Applicant Submittal (PDF) 3. Architectural Inventory Form (PDF) 4. Staff Presentation (PDF) 5. Demo Alt Review Form (PDF) 2 Packet Pg. 13 Stove r St E Elizabeth St Eastdale Dr E Plum St Locust St Whedbee St Smith St Edwards St Garfield St Garfield St N e ws o m St © 601 E. Vicinity Elizabeth Map Street 1 inch = 227 feet Site 2.a Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: Location Map (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) 2.b Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Applicant Submittal (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL 2.b Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Applicant Submittal (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL 2.b Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Applicant Submittal (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL I. IDENTIFICATION 1. Resource number: 5LR.2534 2. Temporary resource number: N/A 3. County: Larimer 4. City: Fort Collins 5. Historic building name: Merrick Residence 6. Current building name: Hannah House 7. Building address: 601 East Elizabeth Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 8. Owner name and address: Joseph J. and Kathryn H. Hannah 601 East Elizabeth Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 II. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 9. P.M. 6th Township 7N Range 69W NW ¼ of NW ¼ of SE ¼ of section 13 10. UTM reference Zone 13; 494237 mE ; 4491474 mN 11. USGS quad name: Fort Collins, CO Year: 1960; Photorevised 1984 Map scale: X 7.5' 15' 12. Lot(s): North 70 feet of Lots 4 and 5 Block: 1 Plat: Crafts Resubdivision of the Lake Park Addition Year Platted: 1889 13. Boundary Description and Justification: The site boundary corresponds to the recorded legal description/parcel limits of Larimer County Parcel No. 97133-05-004, comprising the North 70 feet of Lots 4 & 5 in Block 1 of Craft’s Resubdivision of the Lake Park Addition to Fort Collins. The parcel has a rectangular boundary measuring 88 feet wide by 70 feet deep, and encompasses 6,160 square feet (0.14 acre) of land. The parcel contains a 1.5-story, wood frame dwelling constructed in 1940, The site boundary encompasses the area associated with its historic residential use. III. ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION 14. Building plan (footprint, shape): Irregular 15. Dimensions in feet: Length: 44 ft. x Width: 36 ft. 16. Number of stories: 1.5 17. Primary external wall material(s): Wood-horizontal siding (clapboard) 18. Roof configuration: Gabled – Side Gable Official eligibility determination (OAHP use only) Date ____________ Initials ________________ ______ Determined Eligible- NR ______ Determined Not Eligible- NR ______ Determined Eligible- SR ______ Determined Not Eligible- SR ______ Need Data ______ Contributes to eligible NR District ______ Noncontributing to eligible NR District OAHP1403 Rev. 9/98 COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY Architectural Inventory Form 2.c Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 19. Primary external roof material: Composition shingles 20. Special features: Porch, chimney, dormer 21. General architectural description: Located on the southeast corner of East Elizabeth Street and Smith Street in Fort Collins, this parcel contains a 1½ story, wood frame Minimal Traditional style dwelling and a detached, side-gabled wood frame two-car garage. The house is clad with wide clapboard siding which may or may not be original, and its steeply-pitched roof has nearly flush eaves and is covered with composition shingles. A massive red brick exterior chimney is attached to the east elevation. The house consists of a side-gabled front mass with an intersecting-gabled wing offset to the west. The façade is symmetrically-arranged, with a centrally-placed main entry flanked on each side by two six-over-six light, double-hung wood sash windows equipped with decorative (non- functional), dark-stained shutters. Similar windows are also installed on the side elevations at the ground floor level. The main entry consists of a dark-stained glazed wooden door (likely original), containing six small lights near the top of the door. The front door is set within a Classically-inspired elegant decorative wooden surround featuring pilasters/stylized Classical columns supporting a wooden lintel. The side elevations are fenestrated on the upper story with tall, narrow, 4/4 light double-hung wood sash windows, and a rectangular louvered vent is installed beneath the peak of the gable. The west elevation (the rear wing) features a projecting, enclosed, clapboard-clad porch covered by a shed roof. This porch has a centrally-placed entry flanked by large fixed windows, and similar windows are installed on the sides of the porch. On the roof above this west side porch is a narrow gabled dormer containing a six-over-six light double hung window. The dormer is clad with clapboard. The rear/south elevation contains rear entries with glazed double (French) doors on both the main mass and intersecting west wing, both of which are accessed via a wooden deck. Double-hung, multi-light wood sash windows are placed on these rear elevations. A distinctive feature on the gabled south wall of the west wing is a small fixed octagonal upper story window. A large shed-roofed dormer has also been added to the south side of the main mass of the house, and is equipped with tandem sets of double-hung, multi- light windows. 22. Architectural style/building type (duplex): Minimal Traditional 23. Landscaping or special setting features: This residential property occupies a corner lot on the southeast corner of East Elizabeth Street and Smith Street in the Crafts Resubdivision of the Lake Side Addition to Fort Collins. It is situated within the historic “Eastside Neighborhood” area, which is largely filled with historic wood frame and brick single-family dwellings ranging in height from 1-2 stories. Homes in this part of Fort Collins include examples of the Folk Victorian, Vernacular Wood Frame, Classic Cottage, Craftsman bungalows, and Minimal Traditional-styles, which are common throughout the older residential areas of Fort Collins. The property at 601 East Elizabeth Street is very attractively landscaped and meticulously cared for, and contains wide variety of shrubs, flowering plants, grasses, and trees as well as walkways. A spacious modern wood deck occupies the space between the intersecting wings at the rear of the home, and a beautiful wooden pergola covers a portion of this rear deck. The small back yard, behind the garage and east of the house, is covered with a manicured grass lawn. A concrete sidewalk extends along the front of the lot, but it does not continue along the west (Smith Street) side of the property. The home at 601 E. Elizabeth Street is somewhat isolated from other residences, since it is flanked on the east by the spacious parking lot for the First United Methodist Church, and to the west, across Smith Street, by Harris Bilingual (public) 2.c Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 School, an older buff-colored brick building which was originally called the Lincoln School (built in 1918). Along the north side of the 600 block of East Elizabeth Street, facing the property, is a row of well-maintained, older, mainly two-story homes. 24. Associated buildings, features, or objects: One outbuilding is situated on the property: a tall, side-gabled wood frame detached, two-car garage is situated directly east of the house, and is accessed via a wide concrete-paved driveway. The garage is placed relatively close to the house, and extends nearly to the east lot line. The garage is clad with wide clapboard similar to the siding on the home. It is equipped with a modern roll-up metal garage door on its north side, and a modern pedestrian access door is located on the building’s west side, accessed by a narrow concrete walkway running between the house and garage. The garage is fenestrated with 6/6-light, double hung windows, including one on the west elevation to the right of the entry, and another on the south elevation that is equipped with stained wood decorative shutters. IV. ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY 25. Date of Construction: Estimate: Actual: 1940 Source(s) of information: Building Permit #6263, dated July 5, 1940, recorded in Fort Collins Building Permit Log Book (c. 1920-1951). On file at the Fort Collins Local History Archive 26. Architect: Unknown Source(s) of information: Not applicable 27. Builder/Contractor: Unknown Source(s) of information: Not applicable 28. Original owner: Gordon R. Merrick and Nelouise W. Merrick Source(s) of information: 1940 Building Permit (#6263) and city directory data 29. Construction history (include description and dates of major additions, alterations, or demolitions): This home was originally constructed in 1940, and no building permits were found for modifications made prior to 1950. The projecting enclosed west side porch was built sometime between 1968 and 1994, and replaced an attached one-car garage in the same location. Based upon a photo appearing in the 1948 Assessor’s property record, this garage evidently projected from the west wing and had a flat roof with a balustrade railing forming a balcony. When the attached garage was converted into the projecting, shed-roofed porch visible today (between 1968 and 1994), the detached garage to the east of the house was constructed. The south side shed dormers may also represent non-original features added at an unknown date. Based on inspection in the summer of 2016, the house’s façade appears to be relatively unaltered, notably still containing the original entry and historic windows. Source(s) of information: July 5, 1940 - Permit No. 6263, issued to Gordon R. Merrick, owner of North 70 feet of Lots 4 & 5 in Lot 1 of the Lake Park Addition—for “Residence.” Estimated cost (labor & materials) - $5,500. Also, Larimer County Assessor’s property records for 1948, 1968, and 1994. 30. Original location ___X____ Moved _______ Date of move(s): N/A V. HISTORICAL ASSOCIATIONS 31. Original use(s): Residential Single Family Dwelling 32. Intermediate use(s): None 2.c Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 33. Current use(s): Residential – Single Family Dwelling 34. Site type(s): House 35. Historical background: This handsome home was constructed in 1940 for owner Gordon R. Merrick and his wife Nelouise, the year after they settled in Fort Collins. Mr. Merrick was born in Severance, Kansas on February 23, 1905; his wife, Nelouise Wood (Merrick), was born three years later, on March 12, 1908, in the small town of Ford, Kansas. Gordon Merrick graduated from St. Joseph Junior College in Missouri, and went to work as a reporter for the St. Joseph Missouri Gazette before resuming studies at the University of Kansas. The couple married on September 4 or 6, 1930, in Pratt, Kansas. Mrs. Merrick grew up in Greenville and Pratt, Kansas, and was educated as a teacher at Emporia State Teachers College at Emporia, Kansas. She taught classes in the Norton, Kansas public schools, and met her future husband in the town of Norton, where he was employed by the Norton Daily Telegram newspaper. After their marriage, the Merricks lived for 6½ years in Grand Island, Nebraska, and then headed west to Greeley, Colorado, when Gordon was hired as advertising manager for the Greeley Daily Tribune. The couple relocated to Fort Collins in 1939 when he took a new position as the advertising manager for the Fort Collins Express Courier newspaper. He spent the next 25 years working as a high level executive in the newspaper business. Mr. Merrick was promoted to business manager for the Express Courier in 1941, and later became vice president and then ultimately president of the paper, which was renamed the Fort Collins Coloradoan on April 29, 1945. The Merricks had this house built in mid-1940 for an estimated cost of $5,500, and remained in the home for the duration of their lives. They raised a family including two sons – Gordon Allen Merrick and his brother, Roger Bruce Merrick. Mrs. Merrick was not employed outside the home, but was quite active in civic affairs, including serving as a member of the City Recreation Commission; she also was a charter member of the Fort Collins League of Women Voters, served as a member of the University Women (club), was a charter member and served a term as president of the Fort Collins Assembly 102 of Social Order of the Beauceant, and later in life was corresponding secretary of the Cache la Poudre Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution. She was also a member of the First United Methodist Church in Fort Collins. Mr. Merrick was also very active in numerous professional and philanthropic organizations, including: • Served as president of the Rocky Mountain Ad Managers several times; • Served on the Education Committee of the National Newspaper Advertising Execuives Association; • Was a member of the Inland Daily Press Association; • Served as a director of the International Toastmaster Magazine; • Served as president of the Masonic York Rite Publisher Company • Served as chairman of the Colorado Jaycees Retail Committee for several years; • Served as executive vice president of the Fort Collins Area Chamber of Commerce I 1942; • Served as public relations director for the regional office of the Boy Scouts of America; • Served as a high priest of the Cache la Poudre Chapter 11 Royal Arch Masons in 1949; • Served three times as Illustrious Master of the Larimer County Council No. 21 Cryptic Masons; 2.c Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 • Served as Commander of the DeMolay Commandery No. 13; • Was a member of the Knights of the York Cross of Honour; • Served as the Grand High Priest of the Most Excellent Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons of Colorado in 1958; • Was a member of the Rocky Mountain Consistory; • Was a Knight Commander of the Court of Honour of the Rocky Mountain Consistory; • Was a member of the El Jebel Shrine; • Was an honorary member of the Supreme Council Order of DeMolay for Boys; • Served as president of the Royal Arch Research Assistance, which conducted research on auditory problems led by Dr. Jack Willeford at Colorado State University; and • Served as president of the Knights of the York Cross of Honour Medical Research Foundation, which was concerned with cancer research. On March 27, 1981, Nelouise Merrick died at age 73 at her East Elizabeth Street home. She was laid to rest in Grandview Cemetery on March 30, 1981, following a graveside service by the Collins Chapter No. 26 of the Order of the Eastern Star. Gordon Merrick also passed away at home, on May 22, 1985 at the age of 80 years old, and on May 28 he was buried with Masonic gravesite rites in Fort Collins’ Grandview Cemetery. The Merricks had occupied the Fort Collins home for approximately 45 years – ever since they first moved into it in 1940. During this time span they witnessed Fort Collins grow from a relatively small town with 12,251 inhabitants to a city of approximately 70,000-75,000 people in 1985. Following the passing of the Merricks, the home at 601 East Elizabeth Street was occupied by Bud Razey, a professional loan officer, and his wife Merdeith, a veterinary technician at Colorado State University. The Razeys occupied the home with their young children Caitlin and Kennan at least until 2003. By 2006 the home had been purchased by its current owners, Joseph J. (J.J.) and Kathryn H. Hannah. 36. Sources of information: Beier, Harold 1958 Fort Collins, History and General Character. Research and Survey Report, Part 1. Prepared by Harold Beier, Community Development Consultant, Fort Collins, Colorado, for the City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Board, April 1958. City of Fort Collins 1940 Entry for Building Permit No. 6263, dated July 5, 1940, in City of Fort Collins Log of Building Permits, 1920-c.1951, on file at the Fort Collins Local History Archive. Emigh, Lizzie C. and John Baird 1892 Plan of the West Side Addition to the City of Fort Collins. Scale 150 ft equals 1 inch. Recorded at the Larimer County Clerk & Recorder on April 4, 1892. On file at the Larimer County Clerk & Recorder’s Office, Fort Collins. Fort Collins City Directories, for the years 1936 through 2006, various publishers. From the collection of the Fort Collins Local History Archive. 2.c Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 Fort Collins Coloradoan 1981 Obituary for Nelouise Merrick. Fort Collins Coloradoan, March 28, 1981. Obituary on file at Fort Collins Local History Archive. 1985 “Gordon Merrick dies at 80 in his home here.” Fort Collins Coloradoan, May 26, 1985. Obituary on file at Fort Collins Local History Archive. Fort Collins Local History Archive 2010 “Fort Collins Newspaper History.” Typescript on file at the Fort Collins Local History Archive, updated December 2010. Accessed online: history.poudrelibraries.org/archive/pdf/newspapers.pdf. Larimer County Assessor 1948 Property Card and Photo for 601 East Elizabeth Street (Parcel No. 97133-05-004). From the collection of the Fort Collins Local History Archive. 1968 Property Card and Photo for 601 East Elizabeth Street (Parcel No. 97133-05-004). From the collection of the Fort Collins Local History Archive. 1994 Property Card and Photo for 601 East Elizabeth Street (Parcel No. 97133-05-004). From the collection of the Fort Collins Local History Archive. 2016 Property information record for 601 East Elizabeth Street (Parcel No. 97133-05-004). Accessed online, April 20, 2015 (http://www.larimer.org/assessor/query/Detail.cfm?PropertyTypeVar=Residential&B uildingIDVar=001&NumVar=R0057576&direct=1). The Larimer County Genealogical Society n.d. Cemeteries in Larimer County, Volume I: Mountain Home, Post, Grandview. Self- published by the Larimer County Genealogical Society McWilliams, Karen 2001 Eastside and Westside Neighborhoods, A Cultural Resources Survey, Larimer County, Colorado (SHF-96-02-115). City of Fort Collins Advance Planning Department, December 1, 2001. On file at the Colorado Historical Society, Denver. Morris, Andrew J., editor 1985 “Masons,” The History of Larimer County, Colorado. Sponsored by the Larimer County Heritage Association. Curtis Media Corporation, Dallas, p. 556. Simmons, Thomas, and Laurie Simmons. 1992 City of Fort Collins Central Business District Development and Residential Architecture Historic Contexts. Report prepared by Front Range Research Associates for the City of Fort Collins Advance Planning Department. 2.c Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 VI. SIGNIFICANCE 37. Local landmark designation: Yes ______ No ___X____ Date of designation: Not Applicable Designating authority: Not Applicable 38. Applicable National Register Criteria: ___ __ A. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history; ______ B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; ______ C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or ______ D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. ________ Qualifies under Criteria Considerations A through G (see Manual) ___X ___ Does not meet any of the above National Register criteria 39. Area(s) of significance: Not Applicable 40. Period of significance: Not Applicable 41. Level of significance: National State Local 42. Statement of significance: National Register of Historic Places eligibility-evaluation: Built in 1940, the Merrick House is one of a relatively small number of houses built in the Eastside Neighborhood during the late 1930s through the early 1940s, and it is not representative of an important trend in Fort Collins history. For these reasons, the home at 601 East Elizabeth Street would not qualify as eligible for the NRHP or Local Landmark status under Criterion A. It was the long-time home of local newspaper executive Gordon Merrick, who undoubtedly contributed to the success of the Fort Collins Coloradoan newspaper. However, despite his professional success, the home is not associated with his work in journalism, and the home would not qualify as eligible for the National Register nor for Local Landmark status under Criterion B. The single-family dwelling located at 601 East Elizabeth Street in Fort Collins is evaluated as a modified and unusually large example of Minimal Traditional-style domestic architecture constructed in 1940. While it is an attractive example of domestic architecture, it is not a typical representative example of the style and lacks sufficient architectural significance to qualify individually for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Fort Collins Local Landmark eligibility-evaluation The Merrick House lacks historical significance under Criteria A and B for the same reasons presented above in the evaluation of National Register eligibility. However, as a large example of Minimal Traditional domestic architecture that retains many of the distinctive characteristics of the style, it contributes to the late nineteenth and early twentieth century architectural assemblage and character of the Eastside Neighborhood residential area of Fort Collins, and therefore qualifies for designation as a City of Fort Collins Local Landmark under Criterion C. 43. Assessment of historic physical integrity related to significance: Due to the conversion of an original attached garage into an enclosed porch – a distinctive feature - and construction of a prominent detached garage, the Merrick House retains insufficient architectural integrity as an example of Minimal Traditional domestic architecture in Fort Collins to qualify for the 2.c Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 National Register, but has sufficient integrity to qualify as eligible for designation as a Fort Collins Local Landmark under Criterion C. VII. NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT 44. National Register (individual) eligibility field assessment: Eligible Not (Individually) Eligible X Need Data 45. Is there National Register district potential? Yes _ No X Discuss: If there is National Register district potential, is this building: Contributing _ Noncontributing 46. If the building is in existing National Register district, is it: Contributing Noncontributing VIII. CITY OF FORT COLLINS LOCAL LANDMARK ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT 47. Local Landmark (individual) eligibility field assessment: Eligible X Not (Individually) Eligible Need Data IX. RECORDING INFORMATION 47. Photograph numbers: 5LR.2534- #1-35 Negatives or digital photo files filed at: City of Fort Collins, Development Review Center (Current Planning) - Historic Preservation, 281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80524 48. Report title: NA 49. Date(s): August 12, 2016 50. Recorder(s): Jason Marmor 51. Organization: RETROSPECT 52. Address: 936 Wild Cherry Lane, Fort Collins, CO 80521 53. Phone number(s): (970) 219-9155 History Colorado - Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation 1200 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203 (303) 866-3395 2.c Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 Location of 601 East Elizabeth Street, Fort Collins (5LR.), shown on a portion of the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5’ Fort Collins, Colorado topographic quadrangle map (1960; Photorevised 1984). ▪ 601 East Elizabeth Street 5LR.2534 ▪ 2.c Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 Sketch map of 601 East Elizabeth Street, Fort Collins (5LR.2534). N sidewalk detached garage EAST ELIZABETH STREET SMITH STREET shed dormer parcel/site boundary exterior chimney enclosed porch deck with pergola 2.c Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 October 1948 View of 601 East Elizabeth Street, Fort Collins, from old Larimer County Assessor’s property card; on file at the Fort Collins Local History Archive. 2.c Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 December 1968 View of 601 East Elizabeth Street, from old Larimer County Assessor’s property card; on file at the Fort Collins Local History Archive. 2.c Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), looking south-southeast. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), looking southeast. 2.c Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), looking south. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), view of façade, looking south. 2.c Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), looking northwest from church parking lot. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), view of façade, looking south. 2.c Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), looking south-southeast. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), close-up of windows on facade. 2.c Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), close-up of main entry. 2.c Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), looking east. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), looking east. 2.c Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), looking east-southeast. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), west elevation, looking east. 2.c Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), close-up of window on west elevation. 2.c Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), west elevation, looking east. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), enclosed porch on west side, looking east-southeast. 2.c Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), enclosed west side porch, looking southeast. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), close up of dormer on west side roof. 2.c Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), east elevation with exterior chimney, looking south-southwest. 2.c Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), east elevation with exterior chimney, looking north-northwest. 2.c Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), looking west-northwest. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), shed dormer on south slope of roof, looking northwest. 2.c Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), west and south elevations, looking northeast. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), south elevation, looking north-northeast. 2.c Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), south elevation, looking north. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), close-up of octagonal window on south elevation. 2.c Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), rear view, looking west. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), rear view, looking northwest. 2.c Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), rear wing, looking west. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), detached garage, looking south. 2.c Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), detached garage, looking south. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), detached garage, looking south. 2.c Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), detached garage, looking south. 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), detached garage, looking south. 2.c Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.2534 601 East Elizabeth Street (5LR.2534), detached garage, looking south. 2.c Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Architectural Inventory Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) 1/3/2017 1 1 Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission 01.18.2017 601 East Elizabeth Street, Porch and Dormer Addition— Final Demolition/Alteration Review Background and History 2 • Construction Date: 1940 • Community Development and Neighborhood Services (CDNS) Director and Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) Chair Review: • Proposed work is major • Property is individually eligible as a Fort Collins Landmark under Standard C: Design/Construction - unique example of Minimal Traditional style 2.d Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Staff Presentation (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) 1/3/2017 2 Location and Context 3 601 East Elizabeth North Elevation, 2016 2.d Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Staff Presentation (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) 1/3/2017 3 601 East Elizabeth WestElevation Elevation Southwest 601 East Elizabeth EastGarage Elevation Detached 2.d Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Staff Presentation (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) 1/3/2017 4 Project Summary 7 • Front Porch Addition • Dormer Addition Role of the Landmark Preservation Commission • Approve the proposal • Delay for no more than 45 days for additional information and possible City Council action 8 2.d Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Staff Presentation (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) 1/3/2017 5 9 Cassandra Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planner Landmark Preservation Commission 01.18.2017 601 East Elizabeth Street, Porch and Dormer Addition— Final Demolition/Alteration Review 2.d Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Staff Presentation (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) 2.e Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Demo Alt Review Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) 2.e Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Demo Alt Review Form (5167 : 601 EAST ELIZABETH STREET - FINAL DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW) Agenda Item 3 Item # 3 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY January 18, 2017 Landmark Preservation Commission STAFF Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Planner SUBJECT DOWNTOWN PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to provide feedback and a recommendation to City Council regarding the potential adoption of the Fort Collins Downtown Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Historic Preservation staff recommends that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to City Council adoption of the proposed Downtown Plan. SAMPLE MOTIONS FOR RECOMMENDATION: If the Commission agrees that it has the information it requires for the full consideration of the plan and is ready to make a motion, it may propose a motion based on the following. [Note: The Commission may propose additional findings of fact or alter the motion according to its evaluation.] Motion for Approval: “I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to City Council adoption of the Downtown Plan, finding that it supports a vision for a dynamic urban setting in Fort Collins that recognizes and protects the value and character of the existing historic built environment.” Motion for Denial: “I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to City Council denial of the Downtown Plan, finding that finding that it does not support a vision for a dynamic urban setting in Fort Collins that recognizes and protects the value and character of the existing historic built environment.” BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION At the Landmark Preservation Commission regular meetings held on November 18, 2015, March 9, 2016, and November 9, 2016, planning staff presented information on the Downtown Plan and requested initial comments from Commission members. At the January 11, 2017 work session, the Commission may provide input and suggest final changes to the document and/or request additional information required in order to make a recommendation to City Council on January 18, 2017 regarding adoption of the plan. The Downtown Plan draft document is available for review at <http://www.fcgov.com/planning/downtown/pdf/2016-1108_DowntownPlanPublicDraft.pdf> . 3 Packet Pg. 57 1 Downtown Plan Landmark Preservation Commission January 18, 2017 1 Objectives: Update on Draft Downtown Plan Discussion to prepare for February recommendation to Council 2 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 2 The Downtown Plan guides: • Programs & projects • Regulations • Funding • Infrastructure investments • Development patterns • Character & identity 3 Process 4 Project Budget: $236,000 • Consultant assistance • Public outreach • Document production 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 3 Community Engagement 5 Working Groups 6 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 4 Character Sub‐Districts 7 Draft Plan Timeline 8 • Nov 7: Draft Plan posted for public review • Nov 7 –Dec 11: Public review period • Open houses • Coffee shop chats • Presentations to boards, commissions and community groups • Dec 12 –30: Revise and finalize plan • Jan 17 –City Council Adoption Hearing 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 5 9 Urban Design Principles • Principle UD‐1: Recognize and promote differences and defining characteristics in the varied character subdistricts that make up the Downtown. • Principle UD‐2: Allow taller buildings in appropriate character districts while maximizing compatibility through appropriate design. • Principle UD‐3: Promote high‐quality building design and materials. • Principle UD‐4: Preserve resources that contribute to the historic character and authenticity of downtown. • Principle UD‐5: Continue to develop a framework of attractive streetscapes. • Principle UD‐6: Invest in new public gathering spaces and improvements to existing public spaces. • Principle UD‐7: Provide clear and inviting Downtown Gateways. 10 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 6 11 Urban Design – Tools • Pro Forma Analysis – Weigh financial tradeoffs among building design options – Analyze a range of methods to increase affordability – Clarify financial impacts of parking requirements • Photo‐realistic 3‐D Model – Examine options for building heights and massing – Evaluate building stepbacks – Explore a range of building material treatments – Help increase predictability in development review 12 Urban Design ‐ Maintaining Pedestrian Scale 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 7 13 Urban Design ‐ Maintaining Pedestrian Scale Urban Design ‐ Historic Pedestrian Scale 14 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 8 Streetscape Design 15 Private Outdoor Spaces 16 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 9 17 Clear and Inviting Gateways Framework 18 • Gateways • Greenways • Convertible Streets • Bike Routes • Key Projects – Mulberry – Riverside – Canyon – Greenways – Buffer Transition Areas 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 10 Transportation & Parking • Principle TP‐1: Provide safe, convenient, and comfortable travel options to, from, and around downtown for all modes of travel and people of all ages and abilities, with a special focus on biking, walking, and riding transit to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. • Principle TP‐2: Manage on‐street and structured parking facilities for all users ‐ including primary employment, ground floor retail, business services and visitors ‐ that adequately balances supply and demand, and provide parking infrastructure to support future growth. • Principle TP‐3: Provide timely and informative communications about real‐time travel/parking conditions and options. 19 Market & Economy 20 • Principle ME‐1: Strengthen downtown’s business mix by addressing market opportunities in the residential, commercial, retail, industrial, and visitor sectors. • Principle ME‐2: Identify and create sustainable funding sources to incentivize desirable development, including unique retail, employment centers, diverse housing types and high‐quality design. • Principle ME‐3: Encourage new investment in Downtown while continuing to ensure that new development fits into the overall downtown context. 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 11 Arts & Culture • Principle AC‐1: Develop the Creative Network for artists, creative people, and creative businesses in downtown. • Principle AC‐2: Support the creation of an Office of Creative Culture and centralized resources for the creative industries and community as an essential component to achieving the vision. • Principle AC‐3: Support arts, culture, and creative enterprises with facilities, promotion, expanded program opportunities, and funding. • Principle AC‐4: Improve affordability and availability of live/work and studio space for artists and creative people. • Principle AC‐5: Explore opportunities to incorporate more art into downtown properties, businesses, and public spaces. 21 Energy & Environment • Principle EE‐1: Celebrate, preserve and enhance the Poudre River Corridor and other unique natural resources. • Principle EE‐2: Demonstrate and showcase technologies, strategies and innovative approaches that advance the city’s climate action goals. • Principle EE‐3:Incorporate opportunities to find respite and enjoy nature throughout Downtown. • Principle EE‐4: Ensure that Downtown utility infrastructure meets the needs of current and future property owners, businesses, residents and visitors. 22 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 12 Management & Maintenance • Principle MM‐1: Downtown’s public pedestrian space should be managed to emphasize walkability and pedestrian priority. Inviting people to walk around downtown with ease and comfort is the primary function of downtown’s sidewalks; additional uses of the sidewalk right of way add vitality and interest but need to be carefully managed. • Principle MM‐2: A sense of safety and a comfortable, welcoming atmosphere is crucial to of Downtown’s success. • Principle MM‐3: Improving understanding of homeless‐related issues among all those affected, and supporting efforts to address needs, are crucial to addressing the realities of homelessness in Downtown. • Principle MM 4: Expand maintenance capabilities to keep up with growth and success. • Principle MM 5: Address issues and tradeoffs related to community events and festivals, balancing the number and scale to avoid ‘large event fatigue’. • Principle MM 6: Coordinate overall communications and messaging about Downtown. 23 Character Sub‐Districts 24 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 13 25 Implementation • Immediate Actions (Within 120 Days of Adoption): Items identified for completion concurrently with or immediately following adoption of the Downtown Plan. • Short‐Term Actions (2017‐2018): Items identified for completion within the current Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO) budget cycle. • Mid‐Term Actions (2019‐2026): High‐priority items that should be initiated and implemented in alignment with upcoming budget cycles. • Ongoing Programs & Actions: Items that are already in progress, do not have a specified timeframe, or generally require ongoing coordination to implement. 26 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 14 Key Immediate Implementation Actions • Management and Maintenance – Support implementation of Street Outreach Team – Coordinate philosophy and approach to Downtown events • Energy and Environment – Expand education and incentives to encourage energy efficiency retrofits – Encourage ideas that support greenhouse gas reduction goals – Prioritize and create timelines for replacement of water/wastewater infrastructure Downtown 27 • Transportation and Parking – Explore staffing and technical needs to implement parking recommendations (expanded enforcement, establishing zones) – Explore parking applications to provide real‐ time availability information to residents and visitors – Improve wayfinding to parking spaces and garages 28 Key Immediate Implementation Actions 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) 15 Key Immediate Implementation Actions • Urban Design – Amend the Land Use Code to incorporate Character Districts, establish appropriate setbacks and easements, and clarify streetscape design requirements – Downzone identified parcels along Riverside and place into Old Town Neighborhoods Plan area – Amend Sign Code to include provisions to re‐create or rehabilitate historic signs and require pedestrian‐oriented signs – Evaluate economic impact of building design standards (FAR, height, massing, etc) and develop performance incentives to balance design performance and cost 29 Questions? 30 3a. Packet Pg. 57- Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation (DOWNTOWN PLAN) Agenda Item 4 Item # 4 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY January 18, 2017 Landmark Preservation Commission STAFF Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Planner SUBJECT OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to provide feedback and a recommendation to City Council regarding the potential adoption of the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Historic Preservation staff recommends that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to City Council adoption of the proposed Old Town Neighborhoods Plan. SAMPLE MOTIONS FOR RECOMMENDATION: If the Commission agrees that it has the information it requires for the full consideration of the proposed plan, and is ready to make a motion, it may propose a motion based on the following. [Note: The Commission may propose additional findings of fact or alter the motion according to its evaluation.] Motion for Approval: “I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to City Council adoption of the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan, finding that it promotes the retention and enhancement of the defining neighborhood character.” Motion for Denial: “I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to City Council denial of the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan, finding that it does not promote the retention and enhancement of the defining neighborhood character.” BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION At the March 25, 2015 work session and November 9, 2016 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission, planning staff presented information on the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan and requested initial comments from Commission members. At the January 11, 2017 work session, the Commission may provide input and suggest final changes to the document and/or request additional information required in order to make a recommendation to City Council on January 18, 2017 regarding adoption of the plan. The Old Town Neighborhoods Plan draft document is available for review at <http://www.fcgov.com/planning/otnp/index.php>. ATTACHMENTS 1. LPC Memo from Planning Staff - OTNP (DOC) 4 Packet Pg. 58 MEMORANDUM From: Planning Staff Date: January 4, 2017 To: Landmark Preservation Commission Subject: January 11, 2017 LPC Work Session: Old Town Neighborhoods Plan and Design Guidelines – Draft Plan Documents Comments The Old Town Neighborhoods Plan (OTNP) and corresponding Old Town Neighborhoods Design Guidelines (DG) items have been placed on the Landmark Preservation Commission January 11, 2017 Work Session agenda for staff to get feedback from the LPC on the draft documents. A PDF copy of the draft plans are attached to this memo. This is the final opportunity for the LPC to provide feedback before the scheduled January 18 regular meeting and recommendation to City Council. Staff is directing the LPC to focus on the last section of the OTNP document relating to policy direction and implementation. The Design Guidelines document has been revised by the consultants based on recent comments. Staff is prepared to bring the Neighborhood Design Guidelines document forward for consideration for adoption concurrent with the Plan. Other implementation recommendations are identified for follow up after plan adoption, needing additional public outreach. For more information on the Plan, please visit the project webpage at: www.fcgov.com/otnp. A few key questions are identified to guide the Work Session discussion. 1. Old Town Neighborhoods Plan  Are there any policies that need changes, or any topics missing?  Are there any implementation actions that need changes, or anything missing? 2. Old Town Neighborhoods Design Guidelines  General comments  Missing information  Ideas for application of document Planning, Development and Transportation Services Planning Services 281 North College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/currentplanning 4.a Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: LPC Memo from Planning Staff - OTNP (5188 : OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS PLAN) 1 1 Old Town Neighborhoods Plan 2 Plan Overview • Combined update of the Eastside & Westside Neighborhood Plans • Address emerging issues with land use, mobility, housing, compatibility and sustainability • Updated Neighborhood Vision & Plan Framework • Updated Policy Guidance • Plan Implementation recommendations Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation - Old Town Neighborhood Plan 4b. Packet Pg. 59- 2 3 Plan Process Phase 1: Existing Conditions/Issues Phase 2: Visioning Phase 3: Plan Framework Phase 4: Policies & Strategies Phase 5: Implementation & Adoption (Late 2016/ Earl. 2017) We Are Here 4 Organizing Topics Landscaping, historic resources, design Zoning, land-use, transitions & buffers Local network, Arterial corridors, safety, convenience Affordability, accessory units, energy upgrades Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation - Old Town Neighborhood Plan 4b. Packet Pg. 59- 3 5 Vision Celebrating and enhancing the qualities that make the neighborhoods unique and which foster “Old Town Charm” Neighborhood designed for friendly interactions and a high quality of life. Neighborhoods integrated into the community with safe and convenient travel options. Neighborhoods with the resources and knowledge to help maintain and improve their economic, social, and environmental vibrancy. UNIQUE LIVABLE CONNECTED SUSTAINABLE Plan Framework Map 6 Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation - Old Town Neighborhood Plan 4b. Packet Pg. 59- 4 7 Policies / Strategies 8 Policies – Strategies - Implementation Policy LUT 1: Preserve the character and compatibility of the Old Town Neighborhoods. • Support/maintain existing conservation zoning • Support neighborhood & property owner initiated requests for historic designation NCC1: Preserve and enhance the character and “Old Town Charm” of the neighborhoods. NCC 2: Protect historic resources within the neighborhoods NCC 3: Support compatible building design for new construction and remodels. Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation - Old Town Neighborhood Plan 4b. Packet Pg. 59- 5 9 Key Implementation Actions  Neighborhood Design Guidelines (Concurrent with Plan adoption)  Educational & Promotion Materials for Residents & Design Professionals Neighborhood Character & Compatibility Land Use & Transition Areas Circulation & Mobility Sustainability  Neighborhood Zoning Changes  Transition-Areas Standards & Guidelines  Neighborhood Greenway Routes  Flexibility for Accessory Dwelling Units  Shields & Mulberry Corridor Bike/Ped Enhancements  Neighborhood Sidewalk & Crossing Improvements 10 Planned Draft Edits Incorporate LPC/Historic Preservation Comments & Ideas:  More specifics on the ES / WS Character Study Design Standards Report Card  Supporting property maintenance (International Property Maintenance Code)  Promotion of the updated Design Guidelines  History of carriage house regulations over time  NCL’s role in potential changes  Clarification the design guidelines are different from proposed transition-area design standards & guidelines Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation - Old Town Neighborhood Plan 4b. Packet Pg. 59- 6 11 Planned Draft Edits Incorporate prior LPC/Historic Preservation Comments & Ideas:  Clarification on the overlap and difference between certain zone districts and historic districts  Embodied energy within existing buildings versus new construction 12 Planned Draft Edits Incorporate general comments:  Improve connections between neighborhood plan policies and supportive City Plan policies  Iterate the mixed-nature of stakeholder opinions on certain policies/strategies  (e.g. divided on the role of standards vs. guidelines)  Promotion of the updated Design Guidelines  Clarify process for proposed dialogue/process for zoning & accessory dwelling unit changes  Provide more information & resources on the neighborhood tree canopy  Grammar / readability & clean-up Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation - Old Town Neighborhood Plan 4b. Packet Pg. 59- 7 Questions 13 • Are there additional changes you’d like to see to the Plan? • Is the Design Guidelines clear, understandable, and easy to use? • Any other comments prior to next week’s hearing? Draft Plan Timeline 14 • Jan 6 – P & Z Board WS • Jan 11 – LPC Work Session • Jan 18 – LPC Meeting • Feb 16 – P & Z Board Hearing • Feb 21 – City Council Hearing Attachment: Planning Staff Presentation - Old Town Neighborhood Plan 4b. Packet Pg. 59- Supplemental Slide presented at the meeting (not in original packet) 4b. Packet Pg. 59- 8 Agenda Item 5 Item # 5 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY January 18, 2017 Landmark Preservation Commission STAFF Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Planner SUBJECT OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS DESIGN GUIDELINES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to provide feedback and a recommendation to City Council regarding the potential adoption of new Old Town Neighborhoods Design Guidelines. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Historic Preservation staff recommends that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to City Council adoption of the proposed Old Town Neighborhoods Design Guidelines. SAMPLE MOTIONS FOR RECOMMENDATION: If the Commission agrees that it has the information it requires for the full consideration of the proposed guidelines, and is ready to make a motion, it may propose a motion based on the following. [Note: The Commission may propose additional findings of fact or alter the motion according to its evaluation.] Motion for Approval: “I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to City Council adoption of the Old Town Neighborhoods Design Guidelines, finding that the guidelines support the goals of the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan and promote retention and enhancement of the defining neighborhood character.” Motion for Denial: “I move that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to City Council denial of the Old Town Neighborhoods Design Guidelines, finding that the guidelines do not support the goals of the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan and do not promote the retention and enhancement of the defining neighborhood character.” BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The Old Town Neighborhoods Design Guidelines will replace the 1996 guidelines and reflect the 2013 character area study for the Westside and Eastside neighborhoods, which are together known as the Old Town Neighborhoods. At the March 25, 2015 and April 22, 2015 work sessions of the Landmark Preservation Commission, planning staff and a representative from Winter and Company presented information on the purpose, scope, and outline of the guidelines document. The Commission provided initial comments on the first draft at its June 24, 2015 work session. At its January 11, 2017 work session, the Commission may provide input and suggest final changes to the document and/or request additional information required in order to make a recommendation to City Council at its January 18, 2017 regular meeting. The Old Town Neighborhoods Design Guidelines draft document is available for review at <http://www.fcgov.com/planning/otnp/pdf/design_guidelines_dec_draft.pdf>. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Presentation OT Design Guidelines (PDF) 5 Packet Pg. 60 1 Old Town Neighborhoods Design Guidelines 2 What are the Design Guidelines? Background • Update to 1996 Design Guidelines • Outcome of 2013 Character Area Study • Old Town Neighborhoods Plan implementation Advisory Document • NCL & NCM • Contextual approach • Helps review process • Provides predictability 5a. Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: UPDATED Staff Presentation OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS DESIGN GUIDELINES 3 Update: Revised Draft Changes from Draft #2 (July 2015) • Revised introduction • Better document organization • Expanded architectural styles section • Expanded character areas section • New maps and aerials • Figure-ground illustrations • More user-friendly language • More resource links 4 Update: Revised Draft Changes Currently in Progress for Final Draft • Further clarify introduction • Add architectural styles • Minimal Traditional • Revival (Dutch and Tudor) • Edit certain architectural styles (Queen Anne, Classic Cottage) to show a better range of examples • Include more one-story examples • Clarify identified captions, bullet points, and figures • Add guidelines about solar access and second floor balconies 5a. Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: UPDATED Staff Presentation OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS DESIGN GUIDELINES 5 Key Elements Neighborhood Character • Community identified features • Architectural styles • Character Areas Historic Preservation • Character defining features • Maintenance of historic homes • Energy efficiency Building and Site Design • Mass and scale of new buildings • Additions/Alterations • Site design, landscaping 6 Document Organization 5a. Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: UPDATED Staff Presentation OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS DESIGN GUIDELINES Architectural Styles 7 8 Character Areas 1 2 3 4 5 6 5a. Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: UPDATED Staff Presentation OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS DESIGN GUIDELINES 9 Character Areas 1 2 3 4 5 6 1882-1920 richly-detailed 1-, 1.5-, & 2-story 1901-1920 moderate to high detail, similar styles, similar scale 1- & 1.5-story 1881-1920 limited detail, similar styles, lowest scale 1-story 1901-1960 moderate detail, variety of styles, similar scale 1.5- & 2-story 1941-1960 minimal detail, block and lot patterns 1-story 1941-1960 limited detail, curvilinear patterns 1-story 10 5a. Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: UPDATED Staff Presentation OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS DESIGN GUIDELINES Historic Preservation 11 Character Defining Features • Windows, doors, porches, etc. • Annotated sketches • Photo and sketch examples Maintenance • Masonry repair, window replacement, etc. • Photo and sketch examples • Resource links 12 Historic Preservation: Energy Efficiency 5a. Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: UPDATED Staff Presentation OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS DESIGN GUIDELINES Building and Site Design: Articulation 13 Guideline 4.4 – Use façade articulation techniques to help a building fit within the scale of the surrounding historic context. 14 Building and Site Design: Additions 5a. Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: UPDATED Staff Presentation OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS DESIGN GUIDELINES Application of Design Guidelines 15 Design guidelines may be used in three ways: • Voluntary: Residents, designers and builders use design handbooks or guidelines to inform compatible design, but compliance with the intent of the handbooks or guidelines is not required. • Advisory: Designs are reviewed by a board or commission, but applicants are not required to comply with board suggestions. This approach is sometimes applied where a defined threshold is exceeded, such as above a specific floor area ratio (FAR). • Mandatory: Designs are reviewed by a board or commission to determine whether designs meet the intent of the handbooks or guidelines. Applicants are required to comply with board requests to obtain approval. Promoting the Design Guidelines 16 City Departments • Zoning and Building – permit applications, at counter • Neighborhood Services – Neighborhood Connections program • Historic Preservation – Design Assistance Program, demolition/alteration review process Partners • Share with realtors, design and building professionals • Distribute to neighborhood leaders Broadcast Promotion • Post on Next Door website, City website, etc. 5a. Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: UPDATED Staff Presentation OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS DESIGN GUIDELINES 1 Next Steps 17 • Landmark Preservation Commission review and feedback, recommendation – January • Planning and Zoning Board review and feedback, recommendation – February • Council Adoption (concurrent with Old Town Neighborhoods Plan) – late February 5a. Packet Pg. 68- Attachment: UPDATED Staff Presentation OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS DESIGN GUIDELINES Agenda Item 6 Item # 6 Page 1 STAFF REPORT January 18, 2017 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME REVISIONS TO LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION BYLAWS STAFF Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this change to the bylaws EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The bylaws do not accurately reflect the current Landmark Preservation Commission meetings schedule. This change would correct the bylaws, noting that work session for the upcoming meeting are held on the second Wednesday of the month, and that regular meetings occur on the third Wednesday of each month. ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed 2017 BY-LAWS (DOCX) 6 Packet Pg. 69 CITY OF FORT COLLINS LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION BYLAWS ARTICLEI- NAME The name of this Commission is the City of Fort Collins Landmark Preservation Commission. ARTICLE II- GENERAL ACTIVITIES Meet regularly to carry out the functions of the Commission as set forth in Section 2-278 and Chapter 14 of the Code of the City. Commission members also have the responsibility to stay current on issues regarding local architecture, local history, and good preservation practices. ARTICLE III - COMMITTEES The Chairperson may appoint any necessary committees to assist the Commission. Committees shall be dissolved by the Chairperson upon completion of the assigned task including the submittal of any reports which may be required. ARTICLE IV - MEETINGS The Commission shall hold regular monthly meetings on the second third Wednesday of each month. The Commission shall hold a monthly work session on the fourth second Wednesday of each month. Special meetings may be held upon the giving of at least twenty four (24) hours advance notice. Questions of order shall be decided by Robert's Rules of Order. ARTICLE V - AMENDMENTS TO BYLAWS Proposed amendments may be presented and voted upon at any regularly scheduled meeting. The vote of a majority of the members of the Commission shall be necessary to approve any amendment. Approved December 9, 2009. 6.a Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Proposed 2017 BY-LAWS (5187 : REVISIONS TO LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION BYLAWS)