HomeMy WebLinkAboutEconomic Advisory Commission - Minutes - 12/19/2018Economic Advisory Commission
Regular Meeting
December 19, 2018, 11 a.m.- 1 p.m.
Colorado River Room, 1st
Floor, 222, Laporte Avenue
12/19/2018 – MINUTES Page 1
1. CALL TO ORDER
Time Started 11:09 a.m.
2. ROLL CALL
List of Board Members Present
• Connor Barry
• Ann Hutchison
• Sam Solt, Chair
• Ted Settle
• Linda Stanley
• Denny Otsuga
List of Board Members Absent
• Aric Light
• John Parks
• Craig Mueller
List of Staff Members Present
• Josh Birks, Economic Health & Redevelopment Director
• Erin Zimmermann, Economic Health Admin/Board Support
• Ryan Mounce, City Planner
List of Guests
• Dale Adamy (r1st.org)
3. AGENDA REVIEW
4. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
• None
ECONOMIC ADVISORY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
12/19/2018 – MINUTES Page 2
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The November 11, 2018 meeting minutes approved as presented.
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS.
a. City Plan Committee Update (Listen/ Clarify)— Connor Barry (Listen/ Clarify)
Connor— Housing and Economy Task Force- No update at this time.
b. City Plan Engagement (Follow-Up/On-going)— Ryan Mounce (Discuss/Act)
Ryan provided an deeper dive into the land use inventory, as it relates to City Plan.
Employment Land Ideas include:
• Adjusting the type and location of employment zone districts
• Adjusting the overall amount of employment zoning; shifting some
employment zoning to residential or mixed-use zoning
• Identifying changes to existing zoning or developing a new zone district for
advancing manufacturing
• Allowing greater flexibility for secondary uses and amenities in existing
employment zone districts
Demand vs Capacity— There is excess capacity of employment land. However, a
large amount of vacant employment in the area is lacking infrastructure and access
to I-25. There is likely more redevelopment capacity than estimated. Existing
employment land is often not desirable to prospective employers.
Retail
Office/ Employment: Key prime placed along I-25 (Highway Interchange) and near
major arterials. Access to freight transportation. Putting it all together, the
comparison to opportunity areas are Mountain Vista where the Montava project is,
around Prospect/ I-25, and near the Airpark. This was a qualitative assessment
based on scoring.
• Prospect/I-25: Around interchange itself. Right now, our structure plan is
suggesting this for general commercial. That is what we have up along
College Avenue. Tends to be more focused on restaurant and commercial.
Less emphasis on general commercial, more employment/ industrial.
• Mountain Vista: Reduce size of Employment and Industrial zoning. Consider
ECONOMIC ADVISORY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
12/19/2018 – MINUTES Page 3
residential/ mixed-use designations. Keep Industrial and/or Employment
zoning near I-25, interchanges, railroad.
• Northeast of Airpark. Right now it is employment but would consider less
employment zoning and more industrial.
Comments:
Josh— my initial response is that these proposed changes do align with what we
are hearing from businesses. The Airpark area to me is a way to create an
opportunity to have these types of these uses in the community, instead of pushing
them outward. The kind of industrial uses in this area are smaller in scale. Lots of
trades in that area and as we grow, we want to have a place where they can be
closer to their customer base. Fundamentally, it is about creating more space for
smaller industrial.
Linda— This seems like it makes a lot of sense.
Ann— Feels like we have had a number of conversations with owners of the
properties at Prospect & I-25, would this impact their plans for those lands?
Ryan— It could potentially impact them. These are big ideas we might want to
provide policy for. We recognize we would need more detailed analysis and more
detailed conversation with the property owners.
Ann— Talk to me more about next steps of City Plan.
Ryan— We would have revised language about the need for who we are planning
for what’s left with land supply. Policy support around idea that we would need to
fine tune this and action item that we would need to further study this to then move
forward with any specific changes. Considering what is best for what is left is our
philosophy.
Ann— I think your analysis is great. I just get anxious about the process with the
timeline you’ve been given. Can you give us an update on we did all the scenario
update, at what point does that intersect with this?
Ryan— The scenarios help inform where we might want to make changes in types
of land-use. Balancing employment land with market changes, targeted industries,
infrastructure.
Next steps: City Plan policy direction and structure changes, Structure Plan
Changes (Update map), Implementation.
ECONOMIC ADVISORY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
12/19/2018 – MINUTES Page 4
c. Board and Commission Evaluation (Experiment) Update— Ted Settle (Listen/
Clarify)
Ted— Had meeting a couple weeks ago and decided to use the Scan Tool as the
selected topic. We wanted something to test it on so staff is considering the e-bike
topic. There still seemed to be some lack of understanding around the table on what
the tool could be. Still some differences of opinion on if it is a tool that the staff or
boards could use. The staff is looking at the last week in February as the date. It
may cause lack of involvement in looking at the tool, if we get too wrapped up in
learning about the tool and e-bike concept as opposed to focusing on testing the
tool. It’s important to me that we do it right rather than fast.
Josh— My understanding is that staff would likely use the tool and then bring the
information to boards and commissions, as opposed to them being expected to use
the tool, but that absolutely can be part of the discussion for the group to weigh in
on.
Sam— My take is a little different. I was not inspired at all, but when we put the topic
in the mix of outdoor burning and e-bikes, it makes it valuable. I think the tool is a
good component, but also think it is important to use the tool to help drive some
unified positions on a topic.
7. NEW BUSINESS
a. Recognize Out-going Commissioners— Board (Act)
The Commission recognized outgoing members: Sam Solt, Ann Hutchison, and
Craig Mueller for their service and dedication to the Economic Advisory
Commission. They were presented with a letter from the Mayor and members took a
few moments to share their appreciation.
b. College & Drake Urban Renewal Plan— Josh Birks (Listen/Clarify)
Josh Birks presented on the Urban Renewal Authority and the new proposed plan
area at College and Drake. Urban Renewal is the revitalization of urban areas and
the removal of economic impediments. The most common URA tool is Tax
Increment Financing where at the beginning of the project you freeze the property
value. Through financial incentives and strategic partnerships, the URA attracts
private sector investment to the urban core to achieve the community’s desired
land-use pattern.
ECONOMIC ADVISORY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
12/19/2018 – MINUTES Page 5
The URA invests Tax Increment Financing and forms strategic partnerships with the
aim to:
• Create a project that would not otherwise happen when site conditions make
private, market-rate redevelopment impractical.
• Accelerate the timing of a project when conditions on the site make the timing of
market rate redevelopment uncertain, and perhaps slower than the community
would like to see.
• Enhance a project so that it conforms, or exceeds identified objectives in the
City’s comprehensive plan when conditions on the site are such that the likely
market rate redevelopment outcome is not desirable.
URA is not new in Fort Collins. We have two plan areas in Fort Collins. (North
College, and College Avenue (Prospect South and Foothills Mall).
Why do Urban Renewal at College and Drake? Site falls within Target Infill and
Redevelopment. We have two projects in the area that want to make an investment
(King Soopers and Spradley Barr). Must find four factors to establish area as
blighted our analysis has found 6 factors by the visual survey.
Objectives of the Plan:
• Remedy conditions that impair sound growth
• Leverage reinvestment complementary to community goals
• Effectively utilize undeveloped and underdeveloped land
• Improve pedestrian bicycle, vehicular and transit-related circulation and
safety
Private Investment (Tax Increment) goes back to Tax Entity Allocations, Project
Related, Plan Objectives, Community benefits. The City conducted an open house
in October and received feedback on what improvement categories were the biggest
priority. Intersection, Bicycle and Multi-use Trail, Traffic Safety and Parking where
the top ranked categories.
ECONOMIC ADVISORY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
12/19/2018 – MINUTES Page 6
King Soopers would take down K-Mart Building. King Soopers has been working on
their site plan for a long time.
Comments:
Connor—Have they considered what will happen to King Soopers? Will that make
that area more blighted?
Josh—Them leaving won’t change their eligibility in the plan area. It is in the
targeted area and would probably be eligible in the future and some questions have
been asked why not include it in the plan area now. The new statutes require us to
be very specific and right now I have no real idea of what potential project would be
there. There is also an interest to keep the plan area as small as needed to achieve
impacts.
Allocation Process
Analyze Impact (PRC) —>Negotiate—> Entity Board Approval—> URA Approval
—> Council Adopts Plan.
Timeline: Targeting Council Adoption March 19th
, 2019. Key takeaway: Two-month
delay; 120 day ends Feb. 27th
2019.
Josh— This was meant to be high level orientation, I would like to bring this back in
the future.
8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
None
9. OTHER BUSINESS
10. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourns 1:01 p.m.
UPCOMING TOPICS
ECONOMIC ADVISORY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
12/19/2018 – MINUTES Page 7
January: *Note: Location Change: January 16th
meeting will be in the CIC Conference room at
City Hall, 300 Laporte Ave
• Chair and Vice Chair Elections – Board (Discuss/Act)
• FoCoCreates Arts & Culture Master Plan – TBD (Listen/Clarify)
February:
• Open Slot
• Open Slot
Unscheduled:
• Update on Industry Cluster Approach – TBD (Listen/Clarify)