Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11/12/2014 - Landmark Preservation Commission - Agenda - Regular Meeting
Landmark Preservation Commission Page 1 November 12, 2014 Ron Sladek, Chair Doug Ernest, Vice Chair Maren Bzdek Conference Room A Meg Dunn 281 North College Avenue Kristin Gensmer Fort Collins, Colorado Dave Lingle Pat Tvede Alexandra Wallace Belinda Zink Laurie Kadrich Karen McWilliams Josh Weinberg Gino Campana Staff Liaison, CDNS Director Preservation Planner Preservation Planner Council Liaison The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. Regular Meeting November 12, 2014 Agenda CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA DISCUSSION AGENDA 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 8, 2014 REGULAR MEETING. The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the October 8, 2014 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. 2. DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW PROCESS: FINAL HEARING 920 LAPORTE AVENUE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a Final Hearing for a proposed alteration to 920 Laporte Avenue. The Applicant is proposing to remove the existing roof of the residence’s front elevation and a second story. APPLICANT: Ben Loeffler, Owner Landmark Preservation Commission City of Fort Collins Page 2 3. FINAL DESIGN REVIEW; PROPOSED NEW FAÇADE AT 242 LINDEN STREET PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Applicants, Blue Ocean Enterprises, Inc., are seeking a Final Design Review from the Commission regarding their plans to construct a new façade on the building at 242 Linden Street, formerly the Sunset Events Center. APPLICANT: Brandon Grebe, Blue Ocean Enterprises, Inc.; Jeffery Everett, The Architect’s Studio 4. LANDMARK RESIDENCES ON MOUNTAIN, FINAL RECOMMENDATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for a Final Recommendation to Decision Maker on the Landmark Residences on Mountain Avenue. APPLICANT: Vaught Fry Larson Associates 5. SIGNAGE COMMEMORATING THE BUTTON HOUSE, 711 REMINGTON STREET PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Button House, located at 711 Remington Street, was demolished in January 2014. As part of the mitigation for the loss of this historic building, the City has committed to recognizing the dwelling in an appropriate manner. APPLICANT: City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Division 6. 2015 WORK PLAN DISCUSSION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Discussion and Adoption of the Commission’s 2015 Work Plan OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT Agenda Item 1 Item # 1 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY November 12, 2014 Landmark Preservation Commission STAFF Gretchen Schiager, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 8, 2014 REGULAR MEETING. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the October 8, 2014 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS 1. DRAFT LPC Oct 8 2014 Minutes (PDF) 1 Packet Pg. 3 Landmark Preservation Commission Page 1 October 8, 2014 Ron Sladek, Chair Doug Ernest, Vice Chair City Council Chambers Maren Bzdek City Hall West Meg Dunn 300 Laporte Avenue Kristin Gensmer Fort Collins, Colorado Dave Lingle Pat Tvede Cablecast on City Cable Channel 14 Alexandra Wallace on the Comcast cable system Belinda Zink Laurie Kadrich Karen McWilliams Josh Weinberg Gino Campana Staff Liaison, CDNS Director Preservation Planner Preservation Planner Council Liaison The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. Regular Meeting October 8, 2014 Minutes CALL TO ORDER Chair Sladek called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Tvede, Gensmer, Zink, Lingle, Ernest, Bzdek, Dunn, Sladek ABSENT: Wallace (excused) STAFF PRESENT: McWilliams, Weinberg, Schiager PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None DISCUSSION AGENDA 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 REGULAR MEETING. The purpose of this item is to approve the minutes from the September 10, 2014 regular meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission. Landmark Preservation Commission 1.a Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: DRAFT LPC Oct 8 2014 Minutes (2617 : Minutes of October 8, 2014) City of Fort Collins Page 2 Commission Questions and Discussion None Commission Deliberation Mr. Ernest moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission approve the September 10, 2014 minutes. Ms. Dunn seconded the motion. Motion passed 8-0. [Timestamp: 5:34 p.m.] 2. 321 NORTH WHITCOMB LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this item is to consider the application for Fort Collins Landmark designation of 321 North Whitcomb Street, the Garcia Property. APPLICANT: Kate Polk Ms. Dunn recused herself due to a conflict of interest. Staff Report Mr. Weinberg presented the staff report. Applicant Presentation The Applicant spoke about looking for an affordable, working class home with character. Upon learning about the Garcia family, she felt it was a shame that most small working class homes were not being preserved. Public Input None Commission Questions and Discussion A Member questioned whether the chicken coop should be included, as the application had “Building” selected as the Category Designation. Members said they would like to see both “Site” and “Building” selected. A Member asked about the application’s reference to an association with an historic figure, while later only associations with broad patterns are mentioned. There was discussion about the fact that an association can refer to a pattern of events, rather than a moment in time. Members mentioned that the statement of significance did not provide a convincing argument, and while the property probably should be designated, the application could use some re-writing. The narrative mentions “ideologies”, but doesn’t explain that reference, and is also lacking a good discussion of the Classic Cottage as a style. Members commented that the documentation should be stronger to go forward to Council. A Member asked about the mine referenced in the application, noting there wasn’t any mining in this area, and suggested it may have been a quarry. Staff supported that idea, saying quarries are sometimes confused with, or referred to, as mines. The Applicant said that perhaps the Garcia family had referred to it as a mine. Commission Deliberation Ms. Gensmer moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission pass a resolution recommending that City Council pass an ordinance designating the Garcia Property at 321 North Whitcomb Street as a Fort Collins Landmark according to City Code Chapter 14 Standards A and C, with more elaboration on standard A and C in the documentation submitted to City Council. Ms. Tvede seconded. Members discussed whether the documentation should include the periods of significance. A comment was made that, with regard to Standard C, the period of significance is usually just the year that the building was constructed, while for some of the other categories it would usually be a span of years unless there were a specific event. Ms. Gensmer amended her motion to include the periods of significance for this property under both Standards A and C. Ms. Tvede seconded. Motion passed 7-0. 1.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: DRAFT LPC Oct 8 2014 Minutes (2617 : Minutes of October 8, 2014) City of Fort Collins Page 3 Ms. Dunn returned to the meeting. [Timestamp: 5:57 p.m.] 3. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL - 633-639 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE, MUSIC DISTRICT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Development Proposal Final Comments regarding plans to create a Music District on this site. The plans propose to rehabilitate previously altered buildings. APPLICANT: Laurie Davis, DavisDavis Architects Riley Phipps, Bohemian Foundation Staff Report Ms. McWilliams introduced the discussion, referencing the applicable codes, and what action the Commission may take. Applicant Presentation Mr. Phipps with the Bohemian Foundation explained that the property used to be two separate private residences which have since been joined. He spoke about the intended use of the building to help promote music and the arts in the community. Ms. Davis gave a presentation, showing historic photos and drawings. She referred to the two original homes as the North Sister and the South Sister throughout the presentation. She defined the goals of the project, as outlined in the staff report. Public Input None Commission Questions and Discussion Following a Member question, the Applicant stated that there is a concrete block building they call the “bunker”, which will be removed from the property. The eligibility of that building has not yet been determined, but the Applicant believed it to be less than 50 years old. Additional historic photos were passed to the Commission. The Applicant clarified the intent to reconstruct the porch on the South Sister as closely as possible without the wraparound. The Applicant explained that the only brick now on the South Sister is the battered wall. The addition will carry the plaster back to where the outdoor stair is, with a new window in the same scale as the existing windows. Members also clarified with the Applicant that they are not demolishing the connector between the buildings, just remodeling it. They are demolishing the white wood portion on the North Sister. The Applicant clarified that South Sister had originally been blonde brick, but had been covered over with different brick and plaster to match the appearance of the North Sister. The blonde brick cannot be restored at this point, as it would be significantly damaged due to the attachment method that was used. Members asked when the south addition to the South Sister was added, and the Applicant responded that she believed it was 1964. The Applicant was not sure when the rear addition was constructed, but said it was not more than 50 years old. Members discussed with the Applicant their plans for the brick. They will reuse the brick they remove from the front arcade on the back side, and anywhere they need to fill in brick. They are keeping the newer brick on the South Sister. Members inquired about the history of the development of the buildings to determine whether the additions could be historic. Staff noted that at one time the buildings had been determined to be not eligible. There was discussion about the buildings originally being private homes that were later used as fraternities or sororities. 1.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: DRAFT LPC Oct 8 2014 Minutes (2617 : Minutes of October 8, 2014) City of Fort Collins Page 4 A Member recommended that the addition on the back end of the South Sister not blend seamlessly with the original building, so that the addition reads like an addition, using an offset, or different materials. Another Member pointed out a number of positive aspects of the design, including opening the streetscape, removing the arcade, returning to two separate houses, and capturing the architectural style of each. A suggestion was made to either make the porch more historically accurate to be a reconstruction, or make it clearly more modern and distinct to differentiate between the original and the addition. A concern was expressed that attempting to do an authentic replica gives the impression it is original. There was additional discussion about whether the new windows should replicate the original or be distinctly new. Members asked whether the front windows were older, and whether they could be reused, and suggested searching for additional historic photos. Members discussed the Secretary of Interior Standards, making a distinction between Standard 6, which addresses reconstruction of something already there, versus Standard 9, which addresses new additions. In this case, there is a difference between reconstructing a porch that was there previously and putting in a window where there wasn’t one before. Restoring windows as they were originally would require using true divided light windows rather than simulated divided light windows. Members emphasized that the front of the building that can be seen from the public right-of-way on College Avenue is the most important part of the project, and that it would be wise to invest in the historic accuracy of the front more than the alley view. The Applicant pointed out that the chimney they are removing is on the back of the property. Members expressed no significant concerns about the proposal with regard to the Secretary of Interior Standards or Section 14.48 of the Land Use Code. Chair Sladek summarized the Commission’s recommendations, making the following points: New additions or alterations to the buildings should not blend with the historic features, but should differentiate from them. Removal of the arcade and returning the site to two separate buildings is a very positive development for the site. On the South Sister, either a full reconstruction, using physical and photographic evidence, or an interpretation that would be compatible with the original appearance, is encouraged. The view of the buildings from South College Avenue is of paramount importance. The demolition of the building at 627-631 South College Avenue is acceptable. Commission Members agreed that they were prepared to proceed with a final review. Commission Deliberation Mr. Ernest moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to the decision maker the approval of the final development proposal for 633-639 South College, the Music District, with the Commission’s outlined recommendations. Ms. Tvede seconded. Motion passed 8-0. Sladek thanked the Applicants, and expressed appreciation for their work on this project. [Timestamp: 7:26 p.m.] 4. FORT COLLINS LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF THE AVERY DUPLEX AT 134-136 NORTH SHERWOOD STREET, FORT COLLINS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Staff is pleased to present for your consideration the Avery Duplex located at 134-136 North Sherwood Street. The property has significance to Fort Collins under Landmark Preservation Standard C. APPLICANT: Charles Bacorn, Owner; Kevin Murray and Carl McWilliams, Contract Purchasers Ms. Tvede recused herself due to a conflict of interest. 1.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: DRAFT LPC Oct 8 2014 Minutes (2617 : Minutes of October 8, 2014) City of Fort Collins Page 5 Staff Report Mr. Weinberg presented the staff report. Applicant Presentation Mr. McWilliams addressed the Commission, discussing the history of the home. Mr. Murray talked about the structural condition of the property, and mentioned that the neighbors were looking forward to the designation. Public Input None Commission Questions and Discussion In response to a question from a Member, the Applicant confirmed that the front gables are shingle, but the back is metal. The Applicant also commented that the Trumpet Vine in the front of the home was there in the 1966 photo as well. Members complimented the great work on the application. A Member inquired about the source of the personal detail on the historical owners. The Applicant described using city directories, Ancestry.com, and Colorado historic newspaper collections, and noted he is still working on the chain of title. Commission Deliberation Mr. Ernest moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend that City Council pass an ordinance designating the Avery Duplex at 134-136 North Sherwood Street as a Fort Collins Landmark according to City Code Chapter 14-5 under Designation Standard C. Ms. Gensmer seconded. Motion passed 7-0. Ms. Tvede returned to the meeting. [Timestamp: 7:52 p.m.] 5. OLD CREAMERY LABORATORY BUILDING (BUTTERFLY BUILDING) – 222 LAPORTE AVENUE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed Relocation of “Butterfly Building” at 222 Laporte Avenue. APPLICANT: Jeff Mihelich, City of Fort Collins, City Manager’s Office Brian Hergott, City of Fort Collins, Operation Services Staff Report Ms. McWilliams presented the staff report, pointing out the applicable Land Use Codes. Applicant Presentation Mr. Mihelich gave a presentation on behalf of the City of Fort Collins. He discussed competing goals within the City organization, and a desire to address them. He said the Butterfly Building was iconic and unique. He asked the Commission to consider whether the Butterfly Building would still be eligible for landmark designation if it were moved, stating that six of the seven aspects of integrity would be unaffected by moving the building. He mentioned that the building has already lost a lot of its context due to the other developments around it. He pointed out that moving the building to the east of the new Utilities Administration Building (a.k.a. UAB) was the most desirable option from the City’s perspective and asked the Commission to provide a recommendation based on that location. Public Input None Commission Questions and Discussion One Member reviewed the seven aspects of integrity and commented on whether she believed each was affected by moving the building. She pointed out that the building has already lost some of its integrity with regard to several aspects due to the changes in its surroundings and the loss of the Dairy Gold sign. She said that, while these losses have already happened, they still must be considered in terms of eligibility and whether moving the building further impacts eligibility. 1.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: DRAFT LPC Oct 8 2014 Minutes (2617 : Minutes of October 8, 2014) City of Fort Collins Page 6 Mr. Lingle disclosed that he and Ms. Bzdek had participated in an informal conceptual review of this project with City Staff last week. Members asked when the building was last reviewed for eligibility, which was in May of 2014, at which time it was determined to be individually eligible. Members discussed whether the significance of the building’s historic use and Googie architecture are high enough to offset some of the diminishment of integrity. Chair Sladek pointed out that there is more flexibility for a local designation than there is at the National level and that they don’t necessarily have to meet the State or National level of standards. He further pointed out that all seven aspects of integrity do not have to be in place, just a preponderance of them. Mr. Mihelich commented that he would like to explore the idea of adding a sign in a similar style to the Dairy Gold sign, if that would help to preserve the building’s eligibility. Members were generally in agreement that bringing back the Dairy Gold sign would be a very positive step, barring any trademark-related legality, and commented that it would help with the feeling and association aspects. The restoration of the Northern Hotel sign was given as an example. Mr. Mihelich said they would look into that. Members questioned what the future use of the building would be. Mr. Mihelich assured the Commission that the building would be used, but that ideas for its specific use were still being explored, including an educational function with regard to sustainability. This idea was well received by Members, as it could nicely tie the UAB to the idea of preservation of historic structures. Members also commented that they liked the idea of marking the outline of the original building and using interpretive signage at both the new and old location. Chair Sladek pointed out that the interpretive signage should not reference the name “Butterfly Building”, which is a recent nickname and not historically accurate. Chair Sladek requested that the City launch a landmark designation process for this building, the Old City Hall building, and the Texaco building within the next six months. Mr. Mihelich committed to start the process on all three of those buildings right away. A Member commented that the design of the UAB as currently proposed is not representative of the kind of cutting edge technology for which the building will be used and suggested that the City take another look at its design elements. A Member pointed out that, because the Commission had seen a previous design which was more respectful to this historic building, any motion will have to defend how this design meets Land Use Code Section 3.4.7 with regard to protection of the building to the maximum extent feasible. A Member inquired about the fact that the UAB was originally supposed to be net zero. Mr. Mihelich explained that this building will be better than Gold Certified LEED, which is the City’s standard. He went on to explain that the budget for the building was $20 million, but the original design came in closer to $27 million, which they could not justify to Council. He said that they have already had some discussions about making the skin of the building less utilitarian. Members pointed out that the new UAB will be flanked by two historic buildings from the same era, and that design inspiration can be taken from both. Chair Sladek summarized the Commission’s comments, making the following points: Of the three location options presented, the Commission prefers the southeast corner of the property. The Commission would like to see the Dairy Gold sign reconstructed. The Commission would like to see a functional use defined for the building that is consistent with its historic use as a promotional vehicle. The Commission agrees that the marking of the original location and the use of interpretive signage are of critical importance to the project. 1.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: DRAFT LPC Oct 8 2014 Minutes (2617 : Minutes of October 8, 2014) City of Fort Collins Page 7 The Commission agrees that the design of the new UAB should consider the context of the Butterfly Building and the Old City Hall. While the relocation of the Butterfly Building does not meet the “maximum extent feasible” requirements of Land Use Code Section 3.4.7, this can be mitigated by drawing design inspiration for the new UAB from its mid-century modern neighbors. The Commission also requests that the City launch a landmark designation process for the Butterfly Building, the Old City Hall building, and the Texaco (Haston Oil) building. Members were in agreement that these points represented their recommendations and indicated they were ready to proceed with a final review. Commission Deliberation Mr. Lingle moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to the decision maker the approval of the final development proposal for the Utilities Administration Building in regards to its impact on the Butterfly Building, based on compliance with Municipal Code Sections 14.5 and 14.48 and Section 3.4.7 of the Land Use Code, finding that, while the relocation of the Butterfly Building is detrimental to the seven aspects of integrity and does not meet the Land Use Code standard of “to the maximum extent feasible”, the proposed design, in conjunction with the Commission’s outlined recommendations, mitigates those concerns. Ms. Zink seconded. Motion passed 8-0. Sladek thanked the Applicant, and Mr. Mihelich thanked the Commission for their input, noting that their suggestions will make this a much better project. [Timestamp: 8:47 p.m.] OTHER BUSINESS Members were reminded to provide City-issued iPads to Staff for updates. Chair Sladek addressed the Commission about the “Building on Basics” ballet item which would be discussed by City Council at the October 11, 2014, Work Session. Chair Sladek asked whether the Commission would like him to send a letter of support for funding to complete the restoration on the Carnegie Building. Members indicated they would also like to include Club Tico. Mr. Ernest mentioned that he had provided a letter of support for Carnegie as a private citizen, not as a Commission Member. ADJOURNMENT Chair Sladek adjourned the meeting at 9:03 p.m. 1.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: DRAFT LPC Oct 8 2014 Minutes (2617 : Minutes of October 8, 2014) Agenda Item 2 Item # 2 Page 1 STAFF REPORT November 12, 2014 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME DEMOLITION/ALTERATION REVIEW PROCESS: FINAL HEARING 920 LAPORTE AVENUE STAFF Josh Weinberg, City Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a Final Hearing for a proposed alteration to 920 Laporte Avenue. The Applicant is proposing to remove the existing roof of the residence’s front elevation and a second story. APPLICANT: Ben Loeffler, Owner EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND: As provided for in Section 14-72 of the Municipal Code (commonly referred to as the “Demolition/Alteration Review Process”) this property was reviewed in February 2014 for its eligibility to qualify as a Fort Collins Landmark, and if the proposed work would impact that eligibility. The Landmark Preservation Commission Chair and the Director of Community Development and Neighborhood Services determined that the property was eligible for Fort Collins Landmark designation and that the addition of a second story would adversely impact that eligibility. Following the determination, as outlined in Municipal Code Section 14-72, the property was posted to allow any citizen of Fort Collins the opportunity to appeal the eligibility determination. The decision was not appealed so, again as provided for in Chapter 14-72 of the Municipal Code, the application proceeds to a Final Hearing before the Landmark Preservation Commission. The Final Hearing has additional submittal requirements, including, in part, the documentation of the property using the Colorado Architectural Inventory Form; final, fully approved plans for the proposed work; and a public hearing, with notification of nearby property owners. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Constructed ca. 1908, this modest single family dwelling is a well-preserved example of early twentieth century Vernacular Brick domestic architecture in the “Westside Neighborhood” area of Fort Collins. The house, which sits on a formed concrete foundation containing a partial basement, has walls constructed of pressed red brick, and is covered by a hipped roof. The building consists of a rectangular plan main mass, measuring 26 feet wide and 36 feet long, with a projecting, gable-roofed enclosed front porch, and a shed-roofed, wood frame, enclosed rear porch. The roof has wide overhanging open eaves with exposed rafter tails, and is clad with composition or asphalt shingles. A solitary red brick chimney with a corbelled collar rises from the roof directly behind the ridgeline. More detailed architectural and historical information can be found in the attached Colorado Architectural Inventory Form. PROPOSED ALTERATION: The Applicant is proposing to remove the existing roof of the residence’s front elevation and a second story. 2 Packet Pg. 11 Agenda Item 2 Item # 2 Page 2 STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff finds that the applicant, Ben Loeffler, has complied with all of the required provisions of Section 14-72 of the Municipal Code, commonly called the Demolition/Alteration Review Process. This public hearing is the last requirement. At this hearing, the Commission, after reviewing the evidence presented, shall approve the application. Alternatively, the Commission may postpone consideration of the application, for a period not to exceed 45 days, for any of the following reasons: (a) additional information is needed for the full and complete consideration of the request by the Commission; or, (b) the request has generated substantial neighborhood concerns, and such postponement could, in the judgment of the Commission, contribute to resolving these concerns; or (c) the Commission wishes to investigate the benefits to the city of landmark designation of the property. ATTACHMENTS 1. Demo_Alt Review Form (PDF) 2. 920 Laporte Front (JPG) 3. 920 Laporte Left (JPG) 4. 920 Laporte Rear (JPG) 5. 920 Laporte Right (JPG) 6. Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (PDF) 7. Laporte-Loeffler_Historic Montage - email (TIF) 8. Laporte-Loeffler_Historic Montage_2 - email (TIF) 9. 920 Laporte - Plan of Protection 2014 10-10 (PDF) 10. 920 Laporte - Measurements of Proposed and Context Houses (DOCX) 11. 920 Laporte - Loeffler 2014 01-30 Preliminary Set (PDF) 12. Historic Photo (PDF) 13. Janet Clements E-mail re 920 Laporte (PDF) 2 Packet Pg. 12 2.a Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: Demo_Alt Review Form (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 2.b Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: 920 Laporte Front (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review 2.c Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: 920 Laporte Left (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review 2.d Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: 920 Laporte Rear (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review 2.e Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: 920 Laporte Right (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review OAHP1403 Rev. 9/98 COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY Architectural Inventory Form Official eligibility determination (OAHP use only) Date ____________ Initials ________________ ______ Determined Eligible- NR ______ Determined Not Eligible- NR ______ Determined Eligible- SR ______ Determined Not Eligible- SR ______ Need Data ______ Contributes to eligible NR District ______ Noncontributing to eligible NR District I. IDENTIFICATION 1. Resource number: 5LR.9301 2. Temporary resource number: N/A 3. County: Larimer 4. City: Fort Collins 5. Historic building name: A.B. Sanders residence 6. Current building name: Loeffler Residence 7. Building address: 920 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado 8. Owner name and address: Ben Loeffler 920 Laporte Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 II. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 9. P.M. 6th Township 7N Range 69W SE ¼ of SW ¼ of SW ¼ of NW ¼ of section 11 10. UTM reference Zone 13; 492195 mE ; 4493151 mN 11. USGS quad name: Fort Collins, CO Year: 1960; Photorevised 1984 Map scale: X 7.5' 15' 12. Lot(s): 17 Block: 302 Addition: Capitol Hill Addition Year of Addition: 1907 13. Boundary Description and Justification: The site boundary corresponds to the recorded legal description/ parcel limits, comprising Lot 17 in Block 302 of the Capitol Hill Addition (Larimer County Parcel No. 97112-33-017). The parcel has a rectangular boundary measuring approximately 50 feet wide x 150 feet deep and contains 7,413 square feet (0.17 acre) of land. III. ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION 14. Building plan (footprint, shape): Rectangular 15. Dimensions in feet: Length: 36 ft. x Width: 26 ft. (main mass), with front porch—7 ft. long x 18 ft. wide; and rear addition—8 ft. long x 24 ft. wide 16. Number of stories: 1.0 17. Primary external wall material(s): Brick 2.f Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 18. Roof configuration: Hipped 19. Primary external roof material: Asphalt/Composition (shingles) 20. Special features: Porch, chimney 21. General architectural description: The property consists of a 50’ x 150’ residential lot in the Capitol Hill Addition to Fort Collins, on the north side of Laporte Avenue between Park Street and Wood Street, containing a brick single family dwelling built in 1908 and a detached wood frame garage built in 1925. No other outbuildings are present on the lot. Descriptions of each building are provided below. House: This modest single family dwelling is a well-preserved example of early twentieth century Vernacular Brick domestic architecture in the “Westside Neighborhood” area of Fort Collins. The house, which sits on a formed concrete foundation containing a partial basement, has walls constructed of pressed red brick, and is covered by a hipped roof. The building consists of a rectangular plan main mass, measuring 26 feet wide and 36 feet long, with a projecting, gable-roofed enclosed front porch, and a shed-roofed, wood frame, enclosed rear porch. The roof has wide overhanging open eaves with exposed rafter tails, and is clad with composition or asphalt shingles. A solitary red brick chimney with a corbelled collar rises from the roof directly behind the ridgeline. An enclosed and glazed front porch projects from the façade, and is covered by a front-gabled roof. The face of the gable is clad with imbricated square-cut wooden shingles. The front porch is enclosed by a red brick closed rail, capped by dressed red sandstone, above which are a series of identical 4-over-1 windows that extend along the front and sides of the porch. These porch windows feature upper sashes containing narrow, vertically-oriented lights often found on houses constructed during the first half of the twentieth century. The porch entry is offset to the left (west), and is equipped with a potentially original stained wooden door, the upper portion of which is equipped with 3 narrow vertical lights. Access to the front porch and main entry to the house is provided by a wide concrete stairway flanked by red brick sidewalls capped by dressed red sandstone. The side elevations of the house are fenestrated with large 1-over-1 double-hung wood sash windows with dressed red sandstone sills and lintels. Three windows are placed on the east elevation, along with one small basement window capped by a massive, dressed red sandstone lintel. The west elevation is equipped with two similar large double-hung windows. A small modern air conditioning unit has been placed in the northernmost window on the west elevation. The enclosed, shed-roofed rear porch is clad on its rear/north side with what appears to be non-original vertically-grooved wood paneling or beadboard, and contains a band of seven identical small square windows that may also be non-original. Horizontal wooden drop siding is applied to the west side of the rear porch, and an entry door is installed on the opposite (east) side. The dwelling appears to be in very good condition, and the only alteration noted was a rectangular planter constructed of dark red brick capped with dressed red sandstone placed adjacent to the stairway accessing the front porch. The use of brick and sandstone make this planter architecturally compatible with the historic dwelling’s exterior walls. 2.f Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Detached garage: At the northeast (rear) corner of the lot, adjacent to the unpaved alley, is a plain, utilitarian, wood frame detached garage. This outbuilding is oriented east-west, with a relatively wide, modern garage door installed on its west end. To the right of the garage door is plain, painted wooden personnel entry door. The garage is clad with horizontal wooden drop siding, and is covered by a moderately-pitched, asphalt shingle-covered gable roof with overhanging open eaves revealing exposed rafter tails. No windows were noted on the exposed (north, east, and west) elevations. The garage appears to be in very good condition. 22. Architectural style/building type: No Style/Vernacular Brick 23. Landscaping or special setting features: The house is situated on the north side of Laporte Avenue, in a block containing other historic early twentieth century brick and wood frame single family dwellings. A concrete sidewalk runs parallel to the street in front of the house, and mature deciduous trees which partially shield the house from view seasonally are established in the narrow landscaped strip between the sidewalk and street. The lot is landscaped with a manicured grass lawn surrounding the house. The deep back yard is enclosed and delineated by a 6-foot tall cedar picket privacy fence. One medium-sized, and two small deciduous trees are planted in the back yard. A meandering path of irregular- shaped sandstone stepping stones extends from the east end of the rear porch to the garage at the rear (north) end of the lot. An unpaved, east-west oriented alley runs directly behind the house. 24. Associated buildings, features, or objects: None IV. ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY 25. Date of Construction: Estimate: 1908 Actual: Source of information: Larimer County Assessor’s property record for parcel number 97112- 33-017; Fort Collins City Directories 26. Architect: Unknown Source of information: N/A 27. Builder/Contractor: Unknown Source of information: N/A 28. Original owner: Aquilla B. Sanders Source of information: Fort Collins City Directories 29. Construction history (include description and dates of major additions, alterations, or demolitions): According to the Larimer County Assessor’s property record for parcel No. 97112-33-017, this single family dwelling was built in 1908, a date which appears to be accurate based upon entries in annual city directories. The property’s address—920 Laporte Avenue—first appears in the 1908 Fort Collins city directory. A building permit (Permit No. 1215) was issued on August 28, 1925 to owner A.B. Sanders for construction of a wood frame garage at the rear of the lot. Three more building permits were issued to A.B. Sanders in the 1940s, including one (Permit No. 6939) issued on April 20, 1942 for reroofing; another (Permit No. 8071) issued on October 14, 1944 for reshingling; and the last one (Permit No. 8286) issued on April 24, 1945 to “enclose porch.” The latter permit probably refers to the gabled front porch rather than the lean-to, wood frame rear porch. The house retains very good architectural integrity, and no major architectural alterations or additions were observed. The only change noted was the construction of a low, red brick planter added to the front/south side of the projecting, enclosed front porch, on the east side of the stoop accessing the porch. 2.f Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 This planter was designed to be architecturally compatible by the use of red brick (not quite the same type as used for the house’s exterior walls), and by the use of trimmed and dressed red sandstone slabs capping the planter’s walls. 30. Original location ___X____ Moved _______ Date of move(s): N/A V. HISTORICAL ASSOCIATIONS 31. Original use(s): Domestic (Residential) 32. Intermediate use(s): N/A 33. Current use(s): Domestic (Residential) 34. Site type(s): Single dwelling 35. Historical background: The Sanders House was built during the first decade of the twentieth century, when urban development in Fort Collins accelerated dramatically following the construction of Fort Collins’ beet sugar refining plant on the eastern outskirts of town. The opening of the sugar factory in 1903 was a major turning point in Fort Collins history, and spawned a rapid population influx along with prolific home-building activity. During this boom period (1900-1910), the City’s population grew 169%, increasing from 3,053 in 1900 to 8,210 in 1910. Ten new additions were platted during this dynamic decade, cumulatively adding approximately 271 more acres of residential neighborhoods to the City (Beier 1958). Among the new residential additions platted between 1900 and 1910 was the Capitol Hill Addition to Fort Collins, the plat for which was filed with the Larimer County Clerk on June 17, 1907. The creation of new residential neighborhoods during 1900-1910 boom period occurred primarily on the west side of town (west of College Avenue), and was accompanied by another major development in Fort Collins history—construction of a new electric trolley system to shuttle passengers from their homes to key destinations including the downtown area, the Colorado Agricultural College, the sugar factory, City Park, and the cemetery. The first streetcar lines, built and operated by a franchisee, the Denver & Interurban Railway, were opened by the end of 1907, and others were built before the end of the decade. The new residential areas that benefitted from Fort Collins’ trolley system, including the Capitol Hill Addition containing 920 Laporte Avenue, have been aptly termed “streetcar suburbs” (Simmons and Simmons 1992). Located west of the Old Town area of Fort Collins, the Capitol Hill Addition was platted by the Fort Collins Terminal Land and Improvement Company (FCT&I). Formed in 1906, the FCTL&I company was a partnership of several prominent early Fort Collins businessmen including S.H. Clammer, E.S. Bumstead, B.F. Hottel, and F.P. Stover; its main objective was to purchase land in Fort Collins for the Denver, Yellowstone, and Pacific Railroad. The FCT&I was also involved in speculative land development in Fort Collins during the early sugar refining boom period. The Capitol Hill Addition is an example of FCT&I’s speculative activity. The addition encompasses a grid containing 15 blocks, bounded by Vine Street on the north, Laporte Avenue on the south, Wood Street on the east, and Shields Street on the west. The parcel containing 920 Laporte Avenue was sold by the FCTL&I in March of 1908, to E.C. Cochran. The first residents at this address were Aquilla Burnside (A.B.) Sanders—brother of E.C. Cochran—and his wife Maud. According to the 1906 city directory, Cochran and Sanders 2.f Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 had been joint owners of a business, the West Side Grocery, at 700 Mountain Avenue. In January of 1915 A.B. Sanders succeeded in acquiring title to the property at 920 Laporte Avenue; the deed was granted by his brother and former business partner E.C. Cochran. The Sanders owned and occupied the house for a total of approximately 62 years, from c. 1908- 1970. A.B. Sanders was born on October 19, 1879 in Deep River, Iowa. Around 1906, A.B. relocated to Fort Collins, and went into business with his brother, E.C. Cochran, who in 1906 had opened a small neighborhood market called the West Side Grocery. On January 1, 1908, A.B. married Maud L. Cranston, also from Deep River, Iowa, and the couple moved into the newly built house owned by E.C. Cochran that same year. According to the 1908 Fort Collins city directory, by that year the West Side Grocery had been sold to new owners (M.D. Wilson and L.E. Parker), and A.B. Sanders’ occupation was listed simply as “clerk.” As was generally the case during this time period, Sanders’ wife, Maud, was not employed outside of the home. The couple had no children. A.B. Sanders worked as a grocery store clerk in Fort Collins for approximately 23 years. After the sale of the West Side Grocery, A.B. worked for Andrew D. Galbraith’s grocery and meat store located at 116-118 N. College Avenue until approximately 1920. By 1922, Sanders was employed as a clerk for a different grocery store owned by William Graefe and located at 148 W. Mountain Avenue. By 1927, ownership of Graefe’s store had changed hands, which was subsequently known as Scrivner and Huber’s grocery and meat store. A.B. Sanders’ career path changed around 1931-33, after the onset of the Great Depression. Fort Collins city directories indicate that he worked as a salesman from at least 1933 through 1936, but later he started his own business as a painter and interior decorator. Sanders retired around 1966, and by 1968, his wife, Maud, had moved into the Eventide Rest Home on Lemay Avenue. In 1970, A.B. joined his wife at the nursing home, where they spent their remaining years. Maud Sanders passed away on February 12, 1973 at age 90. A.B. Sanders passed away the following year, on September 4, 1974, at age 94. Both were buried in Fort Collins’ Grandview Cemetery. During the 62 year-long period during which the Sanders occupied the house on Laporte Avenue, they made two major improvements to the property, including having a wood frame detached garage built at the rear corner of the lot in 1925, and having the front porch enclosed in 1945. Following the long tenure of occupancy by the Sanders, the house at 920 Laporte Avenue was occupied by retiree Ira Butz and his wife, Jessie E. Butz, from 1970 through c. 1980. Subsequently, from approximately 1981 through mid-2006, a period of about 25 years, the dwelling may have been utilized as a rental, as evidenced by the numerous occupants listed in annual city directories. Between c. 1981 and 1991, residents of 920 Laporte Avenue included Megan Harrigy and waitress Jan L. McBride; William Hynes and D. Inscho-Hynes; followed by Fort Collins High School English teacher J. Alers, and graphic artist J. Sonday. Then, for a stretch of time from c. 1991 through c. 1998, the house was occupied by Kristin Peterson and Helen L. Potter. Residents living at this address between c. 1999 and 2006 included Timothy P., Carol A., and Gentry S. Settle; followed by Nina M. Emery. The current owner, Ben Loeffler, 2.f Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 purchased the home in June of 2006. At this time (June 2014), the Loefflers, who occupy the property are in the process of planning to enlarge the home. Because of its age, the property was included in a survey of historic buildings located within the “Westside Neighborhood” area, partially funded by a Colorado State Historic Fund grant and completed by the City of Fort Collins Advance Planning Department in 2001. 36. Sources of information: Beier, Harold 1958 Fort Collins, History and General Character. Research and Survey Report, Part 1. Prepared by Harold Beier, Community Development Consultant, Fort Collins, Colorado, for the City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Board, April 1958. City of Fort Collins Building Permits Log Book, 1920-1949 1925 Entry dated August 28, 1925 for Building Permit # 1215 for construction of a [wood] “frame garage” at 920 Laporte Avenue, issued to owner A.B. Sanders. 1942 Entry dated April 20, 1942 for Building Permit # 6939 for “reroofing” at 920 Laporte Avenue, issued to owner A.B. Sanders. 1944 Entry dated August 28, 1925 for Building Permit # 8071 for “reshingling” at 920 Laporte Avenue, issued to owner A.B. Sanders. 1945 Entry dated August 28, 1925 for Building Permit # 8286 to “enclose porch” at 920 Laporte Avenue, issued to owner A.B. Sanders. Fort Collins City Directories, for the years 1902-1904, 1906-1911, 1913-1914, 1917, 1919, 1925, 1927, 1929, 1931, 1933-1934, 1936, 1938, 1940, 1948, 1950, 1952, 1954, 1956-1957, 1959, 1960, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1969-1972, 1976, 1979, 1981, 1983, 1985, 1987, 1990- 1991, 1995, 1997-2000, 2002-2007. From the collection of the Fort Collins Local History Archive. Fort Collins Coloradoan 1968 Obituary of Maud Sanders. Fort Collins Coloradoan, Sunday, February 11, 1973, p.5. 1974 Obituary of A.B. Sanders. Fort Collins Coloradoan, Tuesday, September 3, 1974. Larimer County Assessor 1962 Property Card for 920 Laporte Avenue (Parcel No. 97112-33-017). 1968 Property Card for 920 Laporte Avenue (Parcel No. 97112-33-017). 2013 Property information record for 920 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins (Parcel No. 97112- 33-017; Schedule No. R0030724). Accessed online (www.larimer.org/assessor/query/Detail.cfm?PropertyTypeVar=Residential&BuildingI DVar=001&NumVar=R0030724&direct=1), April 30, 2014. 2.f Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Larimer County Clerk and Recorder 1915 Warranty Deed from E.C. Cochran (grantor) to Aquilla B. Sanders (grantee), for Lot 17, Block 302, Capitol Hill Addition to Fort Collins. Recorded on January 4, 1915 in Book 329, p. 444. 1908 Warranty Deed from Fort Collins Terminal Land & Improvement Co. (grantor) to E.C. Cochran (grantee), for Lot 17, Block 302, Capitol Hill Addition to Fort Collins. Recorded on March 13, 1908 in Book 242, p. 2. Larimer County Genealogical Society 2001 Cemeteries in Larimer County, Volume I: Mountain Home, Post, Grandview. Fort Collins, Colorado: Larimer County Genealogical Society. McWilliams, Karen 2001 Eastside and Westside Neighborhoods, A Cultural Resources Survey, Larimer County, Colorado (SHF-96-02-115). City of Fort Collins Advance Planning Department, December 1, 2001. On file at the Colorado Historical Society, Denver. Sanborn Map Company 1925 Fire Insurance Maps of Fort Collins, Colorado, December 1925, Microfilmed maps compiled by the Library of Congress; available of the Poudre River Library, Main Branch, Fort Collins. 1948 Fire Insurance Maps of Fort Collins, Colorado, October 1948 (updated from December 1925 base maps). Microfilmed maps compiled by the Library of Congress; available of the Poudre River Library, Main Branch, Fort Collins. Simmons, Thomas, and Laurie Simmons. 1992 City of Fort Collins Central Business District Development and Residential Architecture Historic Contexts. Report prepared by Front Range Research Associates for the City of Fort Collins Advance Planning Department. VI. SIGNIFICANCE 37. Local landmark designation: Yes ______ No ___X____ Date of designation: N/A Designating authority: N/A 38. Applicable National Register Criteria: ______ A. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history; ______ B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; ______ C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or ______ D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. 2.f Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 ________ Qualifies under Criteria Considerations A through G (see Manual) __X_____ Does not meet any of the above National Register criteria 39. Area(s) of significance: N/A 40. Period of significance: N/A 41. Level of significance: National State Local 42. Statement of significance: The modest brick single family dwelling located at 920 Laporte Avenue in Fort Collins is one of numerous homes in the city built during the first decade of the twentieth century following the establishment of the local sugar beet industry. Many modest “working-class” houses from this building boom are located throughout a broad area west of the Old Town commercial district, and north of CSU/Laurel Street, referred to by the City of Fort Collins’ Planning Department as the “Westside Neighborhood.” Although associated with the 1900-1910 population and building boom in Fort Collins, the significance of historic context applies to a large number of scattered properties rather than individual houses, and the 920 Laporte Avenue dwelling would not qualify as individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A. Historical research failed to identify the home’s architect or builder, but succeeded in identifying many of the dwelling’s former occupants, none of whom would be considered important in terms of significant contributions to local, state, or national history. Therefore, the property does not qualify for the NRHP under Criterion B. The house retains very good integrity, and is a very well-preserved example of a modest, working-class, Vernacular Brick dwelling from the first decade of twentieth century. However, the architectural qualities of this house are not sufficient to enable the property to qualify as individually eligible for the NRHP under Criterion C, but would qualify it as a contributing element of a potential (as yet undefined) NRHP residential historic district in, or including, the Capitol Hill Addition. The house would also likely qualify for designation as a Fort Collins Local Landmark based upon its integrity, architecture, and association with the 1900-1910 boom period. 43. Assessment of historic physical integrity related to significance: The dwelling retains its original form and has not been substantially modified. The only major change to the building is the enclosing of the formerly open front porch, a change which involved adding wooden partial walls containing windows above the red sandstone-capped brick closed rail, as well as a wood framed doorway equipped with a glazed wooden door in the original front porch entry opening. This alteration was made in 1945, is more than 50 years old, and does not detract from the architectural character of the historic house. VII. NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT 44. National Register eligibility field assessment: Eligible Not Eligible X Need Data 45. Is there National Register district potential? Yes X_ No Discuss: If there is National Register district potential, is this building: X Contributing Noncontributing 46. If the building is in existing National Register district, is it: Contributing Noncontributing 2.f Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 VIII. RECORDING INFORMATION 47. Photograph numbers: 4920 Laporte Avenue-1 through -25 Negatives or digital photo files filed at: City of Fort Collins, Development Review Center (Current Planning) - Historic Preservation, 281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80524 48. Report title: NA 49. Date(s): June 22, 2014 50. Recorder(s): Jason Marmor 51. Organization: RETROSPECT 52. Address: 936 Wild Cherry Lane, Fort Collins, CO 80521 53. Phone number(s): (970) 219-9155 History Colorado - Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation 1200 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203 (303) 866-3395 2.f Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Location of 920 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins (5LR.9301), shown on a portion of the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5’ Fort Collins, Colorado topographic quadrangle map (1960; Photorevised 1984). 920 Laporte Avenue, Ft. Collins (5LR.9301) • 2.f Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Sketch map of 920 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins (5LR.9301) unpaved alley North PARK STREET Lot 16 Lot 17 Lot 18 LAPORTE AVENUE BLOCK 302 2.f Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301), looking northeast. 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301), looking northwest. 2.f Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Façade of 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301), looking northeast. Façade of 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301), looking north. 2.f Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Enclosed front porch windows on façade, 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301). Close-up of original shingles beneath front gable, 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301) 2.f Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Non-original brick planter added to façade, 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301). Eave with exposed rafter tails on side elevation, 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301). 2.f Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301), portion of west elevation, looking northeast. Dressed red sandstone window sill, west elevation of 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301). 2.f Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Double-hung window on west elevation, 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR.9301). 2.f Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 East elevation of 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301), looking northwest. Basement window on east elevation of 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301). 2.f Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Rear lean-to addition to 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301), looking northeast. Wood frame rear addition to 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301), looking south. 2.f Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Closer view of rear addition to 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301), looking south. View of back yard and rear addition to 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301), looking south. 2.f Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Chimney rising from roof of 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301). Detached garage, 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301), looking east-southeast. 2.f Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Front of detached garage behind 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301). Detached garage behind 920 Laporte Avenue (5LR9301), looking southwest. 2.f Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 Looking ENE along north side of Laporte Avenue, with 920 to right of house in foreground. North side of Laporte Avenue, with 920 near center of frame. 2.f Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 North side of Laporte Avenue, looking NW; 920 is near center of frame. North side of Laporte Avenue, looking WNW; 920 is located beyond house in foreground. 2.f Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 December 1925 Sanborn Fire Insurance map of Fort Collins showing 920 Laporte Avenue. 2.f Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 December 1925 Sanborn Fire Insurance map of Fort Collins showing 920 Laporte Avenue. 2.f Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 October 1948 Sanborn Fire Insurance map of Fort Collins showing 920 Laporte Avenue. 2.f Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Architectural Inventory Form 5LR.9301 October 1948 Sanborn Fire Insurance map of Fort Collins showing 920 Laporte Avenue. 2.f Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Historic Architecture Inventory Form-920 Laporte Avenue (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte 2.g Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Laporte-Loeffler_Historic Montage - email (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 2.h Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Laporte-Loeffler_Historic Montage_2 - email (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Avenue) 1.0 Introduction Removal of existing 200 sq.ft. mudroom addition at rear of house; addition of 1047 sq. ft. second floor and 515 sq.ft. first floor with 381 sq.ft. unfinished basement at 920 Laporte Avenue to be completed by HighCraft Builders. 948 sq.ft. of the second floor and 515 sq.ft. of the first floor will have ceiling heights above 7’-6.” For the purposes of FAR, the net addition to the home will be 1261 sq.ft., with 145 sq.ft. added in the rear 50% of the lot. There is an existing 288 sq.ft. garage at the back of the property which will remain untouched. The home neighbors 924 Laporte Ave (to the west of the property), which was built in 1910 and remodeled in 2005, according to the Larimer County Assessor Parcel Information. The home also neighbors 918 Laporte Ave (to the east of the property), which was built in 1929, according to the Larimer County Assessor Parcel Information. 2.0 Scope of Work Interior structural beams will be installed to support the second story addition over the existing first floor space and new floor joists will be constructed on blocking to allow the existing ceiling joists and plaster and lath ceiling at the first floor to remain. A chase will be created in the existing bathroom to accommodate HVAC and the furnace and water heater will be replaced. The new addition will contain a family room on the first floor and 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, and a laundry closet on the second floor. The existing roof over the main portion of the house will be removed, but the existing enclosed front porch and the roof above will remain with no changes. The existing south, west, and east exterior brick walls will remain and no fenestration will be altered or added. The north exterior brick wall (facing the backyard) will remain in its entirety for 2’-6” at the east and west corners. A 9’-1” long section will be removed from the north brick wall at the interior of the house (at the current location of the mudroom) to connect the existing house to the new addition. Additionally, a 3’-6” long by 3’-10” tall portion of the wall will be removed from the north wall to allow for a set of stairs to cross the wall. As stated above, the existing garage at the rear of the property will remain untouched. The work will not affect either of the adjacent properties. Demolition will be done by hand. Excavation equipment will be used within a zone that terminates 8’-0” from the property line. This zone will be demarcated by caution tape, safety cones, and temporary fencing. A roller will be used in lieu of tamping for soil compaction. Required drainage will be accomplished and contained within the boundary of the site, without altering the grade at the property line or causing increased drainage to neighboring properties. 2.i Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: 920 Laporte - Plan of Protection 2014 10-10 (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Avenue) 3.0 Coordination of Project Activities Gordon Winner will be the project manager responsible for the project from start to finish and will be on site for the duration of the project. He can be contacted at 970-566-3438. Additionally, Scott Fetters is the HighCraft Production Manager and can be reached at 970-566-1242. 4.0 Deconstruction, Salvaging & Recycling Materials The bulk of the existing house will remain intact. The main roof, a portion of the back (North) brick wall, and the mudroom addition to the house are the only portions of the house to be removed. Items in good condition will be donated and the rest will be disposed of by dumpster. 5.0 Protection of Existing Historic Property 5.1 Site Conservation – Excavation equipment will not protrude beyond a line 8’-0” from the property line which will be clearly marked. Proper site drainage will be accomplished on the site without altering the grade at the property line or causing increased drainage to neighboring properties. 5.2 Demolition of Building – Demolition will be done by hand in lieu of larger, less precise equipment, e.g., a wrecking ball. 5.3 Foundation Stability – A roller will be used in lieu of mechanical tamping for soil compaction to eliminate vibrations that could affect the stability of the foundation on this and adjacent properties. 5.4 Structural – New floor joists and structural beams will be constructed on blocking to allow the existing ceiling joists and plaster and lath ceiling at the first floor to remain. 5.5 New Construction – In addition to constructing the new floor joists and beams in a manner that will preserve the existing ceiling joists and lath and plaster ceilings, plastic barriers will be installed where appropriate to aid in containing dust transfer to the existing home. Rosin paper will be used to protect the existing hardwood floors. 5.6 Historic Openings & Materials – Non-original windows removed at the mudroom will be donated. All other existing windows and doors on the exterior of the home will remain untouched. 5.7 New Openings – A 9’-1” long section will be removed from the north brick wall at the existing interior of the house (at the current location of the mudroom) to connect the existing house to the new addition. Additionally, a 3’-6” long by 3’-10” tall portion of the wall will be removed from the north wall to allow for a set of stairs to cross the wall. This demolition will be done by hand with the intention of leaving the remainder of the wall intact. 5.8 Floor Framing – With the exception of the second floor framing described in 5.5 New Construction above, the new floor framing will be constructed entirely over new foundation and new walls. 2.i Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: 920 Laporte - Plan of Protection 2014 10-10 (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Avenue) 5.9 Roof Structure and Roof Framing – The existing main roof will be removed by hand and the existing roof over the front porch will remain. The majority of the new roof will be stick- framed. The gabled roof over the new addition at the back of the house will be constructed of roof trusses, put in place by hand and not by crane. 5.10 Structural Loads – The structure has been carefully engineered to transfer loads without compromising the existing building. To preserve the existing foundation at the rear portion of the house, a new foundation has been designed, spaced far enough away from the existing foundation to prevent any force transfer. Additionally, a new beam and supporting pads will be constructed in the existing basement to help support the addition above. 5.11 Supporting and Bracing of Existing Structure; Under-Pinning – N/A 5.12 Excavation and Shoring of Existing Structure – See 2.0 Scope of work; 5.1 Site Conservation; and 5.10 Structural Loads. 6.0 Documentation for Record N/A 7.0 Archeology N/A 2.i Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: 920 Laporte - Plan of Protection 2014 10-10 (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Avenue) Hi Karen, Attached is the second montage, showing the side of the house, in context. The measurements for the houses are as follows: 924 Laporte (neighbor to west): 28'-2" wide; ridge at 21'-8"; 11'-1" tall at edge of eave 918 Laporte (neighbor to east): 29'-3" wide; ridge at 20'-0"; 10'-8" tall at edge of eave 920 Laporte: 26'-0" wide at Laporte side of house (no change); 24'-2" wide at existing mudroom addition (to be demolished)/22'-2" wide at proposed addition; existing ridge at 22'-6"/proposed ridge at 27'-0"; 11'-8" tall at edge of main eave (no change), 10'-0" tall at edge of front porch eave (no change) Thank you, Anne 2.j Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: 920 Laporte - Measurements of Proposed and Context Houses (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 2.k Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: 920 Laporte - Loeffler 2014 01-30 Preliminary Set (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Avenue) 2.k Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: 920 Laporte - Loeffler 2014 01-30 Preliminary Set (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Avenue) 2.k Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: 920 Laporte - Loeffler 2014 01-30 Preliminary Set (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Avenue) 2.k Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: 920 Laporte - Loeffler 2014 01-30 Preliminary Set (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Avenue) 2.k Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: 920 Laporte - Loeffler 2014 01-30 Preliminary Set (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Avenue) 2.k Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: 920 Laporte - Loeffler 2014 01-30 Preliminary Set (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Avenue) Research : Exhibits : Quick Facts : Visit Archive : Site Map : Contact Us All Collections Go! home : advanced search : preferences : favorites : order photographs : about : help add to favorites : reference url back to results : previous : next 100.0% 920 Laporte Avenue Title 920 Laporte Avenue Image ID Number 920LP68 Date 1968-01-04 Decade 1960s Description Single story brick dwelling, constructed c. 1908, with large enclosed front porch and detached two car garage. Property located at 920 Laporte Avenue, and owned by Ira A. & Jessie E. Butz, Fort Collins, Colorado Content Type buildings Image Source Historical Collection Format image/jpeg File Location Tax Assessor Files Language English Image Origin Tax Assessor Print Digitization Format Microtek ArtixScan Scanner; Adobe 6.0; TIFF 800 dpi; JPEG 72dpi; GIF 72dpi Collection Name HistoricPhotographs add to favorites : reference url back to results : previous : next Home : Policy : Museum : Library : Site Map : Contact Us The Archive at the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery, 408 Mason Court, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524, (970) 221-6688 ©Copyright 1996-2012 City of Fort Collins, Colorado Fort Collins History Connection : Item Viewer Page 1 of 1 mhtml:file://S:\CDNS\Historic-Preservation\LPC\LPC Agendas and Packets\2014 LPC Ag... 11/7/2014 2.l Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Historic Photo (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Avenue) 2.m Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Janet Clements E-mail re 920 Laporte (2612 : Demolition/Alteration Review Process: Final Hearing 920 Laporte Avenue) From: Karen McWilliams To: Gretchen Schiager Subject: FW: 920 Laporte Date: Monday, November 10, 2014 2:44:46 PM Karen McWilliams Historic Preservation Planner City of Fort Collins 970.224.6078 kmcwilliams@fcgov.com -----Original Message----- From: John Engel [mailto:johnengelfortcollins@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 12:54 PM To: Karen McWilliams Subject: 920 Laporte Good afternoon Karen, I want you to know that I approve of the project proposed by the owners of 920 Laporte Avenue. John Engel 801 Laporte Avenue Sent from my iPhone 11/10/14 Staff received a phone message today from Adele Engel at 443-8683 regarding 920 Laporte Avenue. Ms. Engel stated that she was 100% behind the project and that it would be a great addition to the neighborhood. Agenda Item 3 Item # 3 Page 1 STAFF REPORT November 12, 2014 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME 242 LINDEN STREET - FINAL DESIGN REVIEW; PROPOSED NEW FACADE STAFF Josh Weinberg, City Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Applicants, Blue Ocean Enterprises, Inc., are seeking a Final Design Review from the Commission regarding their plans to construct a new façade on the building at 242 Linden Street, formerly the Sunset Events Center. APPLICANT: Brandon Grebe, Blue Ocean Enterprises, Inc.; Jeffery Everett, The Architect’s Studio OWNER: Blue Ocean Enterprises, Inc EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND: The building at 242 Linden Street was constructed in 1901, according to Larimer County Assessor records, and has undergone several substantial alterations throughout its history. Little archival/photographic information is available for this building, except for a 1908 photograph looking north along Linden Street. The photograph shows a two-story building in the likely location of what is now 242 Linden, but its detailing is difficult to ascertain. The earliest available photograph showing the building’s facade is from 1968, after the historic façade was substantially altered. The façade was further altered in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. Most recently, the building housed the Sunset Events Center. The applicant has conducted exploratory demolition of the building façade attempting to find evidence of historic materials and design, which is outlined in their submittal packet. The exploration yielded no indication of a historic façade. Staff feels the existing façade has been significantly altered, and does not contribute to the character of the Old Town Historic District. Please reference the enclosed packet from the Applicant for elevations, photographs, and narrative regarding the proposal. Review Criteria: Alterations to properties in Fort Collins Landmark Districts are reviewed for compliance with Municipal Code Section 14-48, “Approval of Proposed Work,” the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Old Town Historic District Design Guidelines. Sec. 14-48. Approval of proposed work. In determining the decision to be made concerning the issuance of a report of acceptability, the Commission shall consider the following criteria: (1) The effect of the proposed work upon the general historical and/or architectural character of the landmark or landmark district; 3 Packet Pg. 60 Agenda Item 3 Item # 3 Page 2 (2) The architectural style, arrangement, texture and materials of existing and proposed improvements, and their relation to the sites, structures and objects in the district; (3) The effects of the proposed work in creating, changing or destroying the exterior characteristics of the site, structure or object upon which such work is to be done; (4) The effect of the proposed work upon the protection, enhancement, perpetuation and use of the landmark or landmark district; (5) The extent to which the proposed work meets the standards of the city and the United States Secretary of the Interior then in effect for the preservation, reconstruction, restoration or rehabilitation of historic resources. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Rehabilitation is defined as the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values. • Rehabilitation Standard 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships; • Rehabilitation Standard 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. • Rehabilitation Standard 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. • Rehabilitation Standard 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. • Rehabilitation Standard 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. • Rehabilitation Standard 6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. • Rehabilitation Standard 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. • Rehabilitation Standard 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. • Rehabilitation Standard 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. • Rehabilitation Standard 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. 3 Packet Pg. 61 Agenda Item 3 Item # 3 Page 3 ATTACHMENTS 1. 2014-11-04 Final Approval Request (PDF) 2. 2014-10-15 Exterior Facade Studies (PDF) 3. 2014-10-31_Progress Drawings (PDF) 4. 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (PDF) 3 Packet Pg. 62 Wednesday, November 05, 2014 To: Josh Weinberg, Preservation Planner, City of Fort Collins 401 West Mountain Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Re: 242 Linden Street Façade Renovation (former Sunset Events Center) Mr. Weinberg, We are submitting this letter and attached materials to request staff recommendation for final approval of the proposed façade renovation at 242 Linden Street by the Landmark Preservation Commission Board. As you know, this project was recently presented to the LPC Board at the October 22, 2014 work session. The response of Board members at that time was overwhelmingly favorable. The property at 242 Linden Street was acquired by Blue Ocean Enterprises in early 2014. Most recently, the building was home to the Sunset Events Center. Future plans for the two story building include a reconstructed façade and a significant renovation of the interior that will reveal many of the original bones of the building. The transformed space will be home to Galvanize, a collaborative home base for a community of innovators, mentors, investors, students and technologists and a place where people grow, launch businesses and life‐changing careers. Based on our assessment of the existing façade to date, it is our conclusion that the Project is noncontributing and not restorable due to the amount of original fabric lost to past renovations. As such, we conclude that the project is subject to the “New Building Track” as described in the Old Town Historic District Design Standards, including the following sections regarding building design: IV. Design Standards for All Properties V. Design Standards for New Construction VI. Design Standards for Signs The proposed new façade design for 242 Linden Street comprises a significantly reconstructed façade that incorporates design elements and quality materials that are evocative of and compatible with historically significant contributing properties in the district without invoking direct reproduction or mimicry. Compatibility will generally be achieved through appropriate alignment, scale, proportion, fenestration pattern, architectural character and detail. A summary of how the Project endeavors to address the intent of each design standard was included in our October 15, 2014 worksession narrative (attached for reference). 3.a Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: 2014-11-04 Final Approval Request (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) The palette of proposed materials includes: Modular clay brick Integrally colored precast concrete base, sills and lintels and trim Baked color aluminum clad wood window and door systems Painted wood or composite trim elements Painted steel lintels and ornamental accent features Simple fabric awnings over ground level storefront Simple painted metal patio rail It is our opinion that the proposed new façade for 242 Linden Street represents an appropriate and compatible design approach that is consistent with the character of the District and surrounding buildings, including recognition of the scale, pattern and detailing of other buildings in the District. We believe the completed Project will contribute positively to the visual character of the District while modernizing the building’s structure and revitalizing the space to meet the needs of a new era of tenants and users. We look forward to the Board’s favorable review and final approval. In addition to our previous 10/15 worksession narrative, we have also attached colored renderings of the proposed façade and current progress drawings for the construction of the Project. Sincerely, Jeffrey Errett, AIA Principal, The Architects’ Studio Attachments: 2014‐10‐15 Exterior Façade Studies 2014‐10‐15 Worksession Narrative 2014‐10‐31 Progress Drawings 3.a Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: 2014-11-04 Final Approval Request (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) Exterior Facade Studies CONCEPT - Without Awnings 242 LINDEN STREET 10.15.2014 242 Linden Street East Linden Streetscape BAKED COLOR ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS AND DOORS MODULAR CLAY BRICK VENEER CAST OR BUILT-UP COMPOSITE CORNICE ORNAMENTAL STEEL, PAINTED BUILT-UP STEEL LINTEL, PAINTED PAINTED METAL PATIO RAILING INTEGRALLY COLORED PRECAST BASE SHIELDED, LOW OUTPUT LIGHT FIXTURE 3.b Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Exterior Facade Studies (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) Exterior Facade Studies CONCEPT - With Awnings 242 LINDEN STREET 10.15.2014 242 Linden Street East Linden Streetscape BAKED COLOR ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS AND DOORS MODULAR CLAY BRICK VENEER CAST OR BUILT-UP COMPOSITE CORNICE ORNAMENTAL STEEL, PAINTED BUILT-UP STEEL LINTEL, PAINTED PAINTED METAL PATIO RAILING INTEGRALLY COLORED PRECAST BASE SHIELDED, LOW OUTPUT LIGHT FIXTURE FABRIC AWNING 3.b Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Exterior Facade Studies (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) Exterior Facade Studies CONCEPT - PLAN 242 LINDEN STREET 10.15.2014 STEP DN MAIN ENTRY OUTDOOR SEATING OUTDOOR SEATING BI-FOLD DOORS BIKE RACKS STORAGE 3.b Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Exterior Facade Studies (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) VICINITY MAP AIR CONDITIONING ACOUSTIC / ACOUSTICAL ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE ADDITION ADJACENT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AIR HANDLING UNIT ALTERNATE ALUMINUM ANCHOR ANGLE ANODIZED APPROXIMATE ARCHITECT ASSOCIATED BOTTOM BALLED AND BURLAPPED BOTTOM OF BOARD BUILDING LINE BLOCK(ING) BEAM BENCH MARK BEARING BRICK BASEMENT BUILT-UP ROOFING CABINET CEILING DIFFUSER CEMENT CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE CORNER GUARD CAST IRON CONTROL JOINT CEILING CLEAR CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CLEAN OUT COLUMN CONCRETE CONNECTION CONSTRUCTION CONTINUOUS CARPET CEILING REGISTER CERAMIC TILE CENTER CONDENSING UNIT CABINET UNIT HEATER" CUSPIDOR COLD WATER DOUBLE DETAIL DRINKING FOUNTAIN DIAMETER DIMENSION DISPENSER DEAD LOAD DRAINAGE MANHOLE UP UP UP UP UP DN DN 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 F F A A B B C C D D E E 1 A3.02 1 A3.02 2 A3.01 2 A3.01 1 A3.01 1 A3.01 1.9 1.9 3.1 3.1 3.9 1.1 A.1 A.1 3 A3.01 3 A3.01 2 A3.02 2 A3.02 1 2 2'-8" 16'-0" 3'-8" 18'-4" 3'-8" 9'-8" 1'-4" 5'-0" 2'-8" 63'-0" 3" 2 1/8" EXISTING BUILDING (NIC) EXISTING BUILDING (NIC) 3 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 F F A A B B C C D D E E 1 A3.02 1 A3.02 2 A3.01 2 A3.01 1 A3.01 1 A3.01 1.9 1.9 3.1 3.1 3.9 1.1 A.1 A.1 3 A3.01 3 A3.01 1" / 12" 2 A3.02 2 A3.02 1 2 33 44 44 5 66 77 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 11 12 13 EXISTING BUILDING FIRST FLOOR EL. = 100' - 0" 1 UPPER ROOF EL. = 123' - 10 3/4" 2 3 4 B.O. FRAMING (E) LOW ROOF EL. = 120' - 2" 2 A3.01 1 A3.01 1.9 3.1 T.O. STEEL (N) 2ND FLOOR EL. = 110' - 8" 1.1 3.9 3 A3.01 MA-02 CMU COLOR T.B.D 1 8" / 12" 8" / 12" 2 (E) CMU BLOCK WALL COLOR T.B.D 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 30 FIRST FLOOR EL. = 100' - 0" 1 T.O. SHEATHING (E) EL. = 113' - 1 1/4" 4 3 2 2 A3.01 1 A3.01 T.O. (N) PARAPET LOW EL. = 127' - 4" 3.1 1.9 T.O. STEEL (N) 2ND FLOOR EL. = 110' - 8" 3.9 1.1 FIRST FLOOR EL. = 100' - 0" F E D C B.O. FRAMING (E) LOW ROOF EL. = 120' - 2" T.O. PARAPET (E) CMU EL. = 124' - 0" T.O. STEEL (N) 2ND FLOOR EL. = 110' - 8" 2 A3.02 NOTE: EXISTING MURAL - PAINTED ON UPPER PORTION OF WALL AT ADJACENT EXTERIOR BALCONY (E) CMU BLOCK WALL COLOR T.B.D 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 FIRST FLOOR EL. = 100' - 0" D E F B.O. FRAMING (E) LOW ROOF EL. = 120' - 2" T.O. PARAPET (E) CMU EL. = 124' - 0" T.O. STEEL (N) 2ND FLOOR EL. = 110' - 8" T.O. (E) FOOTER EL. = 97' - 0" 2 A3.02 1 1 4 Issued For SD: Plot Date Issued For DD: Issued For Permit: Issued For Construction: 10/31/14 10/31/2014 4:17:40 PM A2.12 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 242 Linden - Galvanize 242 Linden Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 14-378 1/4" = 1'-0" A2.12 NORTH ELEVATION 1 1/4" = 1'-0" A2.12 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 ELEVATION KEYNOTES: 0' 2' 4' 8' 16' 0' 2' 4' 8' 16' MATERIAL LEGEND - EXTERIOR IDENTITY DATA BASIS OF DESIGN PRODUCT DATA FIRST FLOOR EL. = 100' - 0" FIRST FLOOR EL. = 100' - 0" A B C D E F 1 A3.02 B.O. FRAMING (E) LOW ROOF EL. = 120' - 2" T.O. STEEL (N) 2ND FLOOR EL. = 110' - 8" T.O. (N) PARAPET HIGH EL. = 129' - 4" A.1 T.O. STOREFRONT EL. = 112' - 0" 2 A3.02 W-02 P-01 (E) 3 7 6 8 9 10 11 11 11 2 2 FIRST FLOOR EL. = 100' - 0" FIRST FLOOR EL. = 100' - 0" T.O. SHEATHING (E) EL. = 113' - 1 1/4" A B C D E F 1 A3.02 B.O. FRAMING (E) LOW ROOF EL. = 120' - 2" T.O. (N) PARAPET LOW EL. = 127' - 4" T.O. STEEL (N) 2ND FLOOR EL. = 110' - 8" T.O. (N) PARAPET HIGH EL. = 129' - 4" A.1 T.O. STOREFRONT EL. = 112' - 0" 2 A3.02 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 W-01 P-02 P-02 FIRST FLOOR EL. = 100' - 0" 1 T.O. SHEATHING (E) EL. = 113' - 1 1/4" 2 3 4 2 A3.01 1 A3.01 1.9 3.1 3 A3.01 (E) (E) (E) (E) 7 5 7 8 8 3 FIRST FLOOR EL. = 100' - 0" 1 2 3 4 T.O. PARAPET (E) CMU EL. = 124' - 0" 2 A3.01 1 A3.01 1.9 3.1 T.O. STEEL (N) 2ND FLOOR EL. = 110' - 8" 1.1 3.9 3 A3.01 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 5 P-01 P-01 (E) P-01 (E) P-01 6 6 Issued For SD: Plot Date Issued For DD: Issued For Permit: Issued For Construction: 10/31/14 10/31/2014 4:17:43 PM A3.02 BUILDING SECTIONS 242 Linden - Galvanize 242 Linden Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 14-378 Revision Number Revision Date BUILDING SECTION KEYNOTES: 1 1 CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PAN STAIR WITH PERFORATED METAL RISERS, CHANNEL Tuesday, October 14, 2014 To: Josh Weinberg, Preservation Planner City of Fort Collins 401 West Mountain Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Re: 242 Linden Street Façade Renovation (former Sunset Events Center) Mr. Weinberg, We have prepared this narrative and accompanying exhibits and drawings summarizing the scope and intent of the proposed façade and building renovation at 242 Linden Street, and chronicling our efforts and approach to the Project’s design thus far. We look forward to the opportunity to review the Project with staff and committee at the 10/22 work session. Project Background The property at 242 Linden Street was acquired by Blue Ocean Enterprises in early 2014. Most recently, the building was home to the Sunset Events Center. Future plans for the two story building include a reconstructed façade and a significant renovation of the interior that will reveal many of the original bones of the building. The transformed space will be home to Galvanize, a collaborative home base for a community of innovators, mentors, investors, students and technologists and a place where people grow, launch businesses and life‐changing careers. Assessment of Existing Building In preparation for a potential remodel of the existing building and façade, The Architects’ Studio were retained by Blue Ocean Enterprises to investigate the existing building for evidence of historically significant details that might have been lost to or concealed by prior renovations, and to analyze the potential significance of the building within the Old Town Historic District. Archival History Initial research was conducted with the assistance of archivists at the Local History Archives at the Museum of Discovery. Based on the photographic, building and tax records found there, some limited history of the progression of the site into its current state was revealed. 3.d Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 2 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx It is our understanding that a building on this site was constructed sometime around or just prior to 1900. We have found a historical photo in the museum archives attributed to 1908 (Photo A.1) that appears to show a building in this location; however it is very distant in the photo and at an angle that reveals very little about the façade at that time. The site was not designated as a “Historically Significant Building” on maps describing a survey of buildings in the City Designated Historic District. Photo A.1: Linden Street, circa 1908 with 242 Linden in background. Resolution is insufficent to resolve details. No evidence of matching fenestration or cornice was found during exploratory demolition Subsequent photos from the 1960’s, 70’s and 80’s (Photos A.2 – A.4) reveal a series of facades devoid of many of the details typically found on historically significant buildings in the area. Any type of cornice treatment is absent, limited or no second story windows are present, and the pattern and proportion of ground floor storefront openings are inconsistent with what we see elsewhere on Linden Street and within the District. Photos from the 1980’s and 90’s (Photos A.5 – A.7) reveal the façade’s further evolution into its current state, including the addition of decorative stucco details and arched openings at the storefront. Photo A.2: Star – circa 1968 Photo A.3: Orion’s Belt Nightclub – circa 1970’s 3.d Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 3 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx Photo A.4: Orion’s Belt Nightclub – circa 1980’s Photo A.5: Electric Stampede – circa 1980’s Photo A.6: Electric Stampede – circa 1980’s Photo A.7: Current Sunset Events Center 3.d Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 4 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx Interior Exploratory Demolition Without sound photographic evidence of an original historical façade, selective demolition of portions of the interior finish on the front wall of the building was recommended, in hopes of revealing more about the building’s structure and original elements, including possible past openings and fenestration patterns. Removal of interior furred walls and plaster revealed a multi‐wythe brick wall construction, with a series of masonry openings that had been in filled with CMU. These in filled openings are approximately 6’‐0” wide by 4’‐0” tall, with a sill located approximately 16” above the second floor surface and a head at approximately 5’‐4” above the floor surface. The placement, pattern and proportion of these in filled brick openings does not appear to be consistent with the vertically oriented fenestration seen on similar buildings of the period and other contributing buildings on this block. From what could be seen, there was no evidence of any special sill, head or jamb treatments or other ornamentation such as stone or brick detailing. A combination of structural steel and rough timber structural lintel materials was observed. Refer to photos B.1 ‐ B.4. Photo B.1: Brick opening infilled with CMU; interior whythe of brick partially exposed Photo B.2: Brick opening infilled with CMU; interior whythe of brick partially exposed Photo B.3: Brick opening infilled with CMU; interior whythe of brick, jamb and sill partially exposed Photo B.4: Brick opening infilled with CMU; interior whythe of brick and head partially exposed 3.d Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 5 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx Exterior Exploratory Demolition Building upon this interior investigation, further selective exploration of the exterior façade was conducted. The strategy for this exterior exploration included cutting several vertically aligned holes through the current stucco skin. Each hole was approximately 16” x 16”, and provided a view back to a masonry substrate beyond. The location of these openings was selected to coincide with the sill and jamb of one of the in filled window openings already revealed by interior exploration, as well as one location at the top of the wall where an ornamental cornice would historically be found, and one location at the floor line where a sign band might historically be located. Our observation of these exterior exploratory openings indicates the current façade is constructed from an EIFS system consisting of a base and finish coat over ½” +/‐ expanded polystyrene over ½” +/‐ gypsum sheathing applied to 2 ½” metal furring studs set out 1 ½” from a masonry substrate. Beyond this layer of construction, visible portions of a previous façade appear to be covered by a trowelled fiber reinforced cement plaster applied directly to masonry substrates. Two small areas of plaster were removed to reveal both CMU and brick substrates, as was expected based on the in filled condition observed from prior interior exploration. This cement plaster was very well bonded to the substrate, and removal of a small area was difficult without damaging the underlying masonry. At and immediately beyond the locations investigated, the cement plaster surface appeared to be flush and without change in plane. This flush cement plaster surface appears to continue uninterrupted to the top of the wall, where it could be observed through an additional exploratory opening immediately below the parapet cap. From this limited exploration, there is no evidence of any original projecting masonry detailing at the sills, jambs or head of these windows, nor is there any evidence of a decorative cornice or band at the top of the wall. Refer to Photos B.5 ‐ B.8. Photo B.5: Two lower exploratory holes opened thru exterior façade in vicinity of window opening reveal cement plaster stucco applied direct to masonry substrate. Photo B.6: Lower exploratory whole with CMU substrate exposed below cement plaster stucco at lication of window opening infill. 3.d Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 6 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx Photo B.7: Lower exploratory hole with brick substrate exposed below cement plaster stucco at location beyond infilled window opening. No evidence of raised decorative brick or stone detailing visible within wall cavity. Photo B.8: Upper exploratory hole (viewed form above) at top of wall parapet. Plane of cement plaster stucco extends to top of wall with no eveidence of decorative features or cornice. Conclusions from Exploratory Research Based on our observations to date, it is our belief that the fabric of the current building facade does not presently possess significant historic or architectural value, and as such is not a contributing property, nor a candidate for historical preservation or rehabilitation. Without additional documentation of the possible form, character and detail of the original building that occupied the site, accurate restoration or reconstruction of significant original details, if any, would not be possible without considerable conjecture. 3.d Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 7 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx Old Town Historic District Design Standards The following summarizes our understanding and application of the recently adopted Old Town Historic Design Standards, and describes how the proposed design endeavors to address the intent of each guideline. Determination of “Track” and Applicability of Standards Based on the above assessment of the existing building, it is our conclusion that the Project is noncontributing and not restorable, and is thus subject to the “New Building Track” as described in the Old Town Historic District Design Standards: As such, the Project would be subject to the following sections of the Old Town Historic District Design Standards regarding building design: IV. Design Standards for All Properties V. Design Standards for New Construction VI. Design Standards for Signs Proposed Design The proposed new façade design for 242 Linden Street comprises a significantly reconstructed façade that incorporates design elements and quality materials that are evocative of and compatible with historically significant contributing properties in the district without invoking direct reproduction or mimicry. Compatibility will generally be achieved through appropriate alignment, scale, proportion, fenestration pattern, architectural character and detail. Proposed new façade design for 242 Linden Street, shown with awnings EXISTING BUILDING NONCONTRIBUTING NON-APPLICABLE NEW BUILDING TRACK 3.d Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 8 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx The palette of proposed materials includes: Modular clay brick Integrally colored precast concrete base, sills and lintels and trim Baked color aluminum clad wood window and door systems Painted wood or composite trim elements Painted steel lintels and ornamental accent features Simple fabric awnings over ground level storefront Simple painted metal patio rail The following sections summarize how the proposed Project endeavors to address the intent of each design standard. Items designated with a check mark have been considered in the proposed design, and those marked “N/A” have been deemed not applicable to the Project. The left column provides the guideline number and design standard directly from the Old Town Historic District Design Standards, and the right column provides further explanation of how the Project intends to meet each standard. IV. Design Standards for All Properties Awnings and Canopies N/A 4.1 Preserve traditional canopies No existing traditional canopies 4.2 Install an awning or canopy to fit the opening and be in character with the building Simple sloping canvas awnings matched to opening widths are proposed 4.3 Design an awning or canopy with colors and materials that are durable and compatible with the structure. Canvas awnings are proposed Street Layout 4.4 Retain the historic network of streets and alleys. Network of streets and alleys is maintained as public circulation space and has not been enclosed or closed to public access Outdoor Use Areas N/A 4.5 A small public plaza or courtyard shall contain features to promote and enhance its use. No public plaza or courtyard spaces are proposed N/A 4.6 Locate a raised dining area (deck) to minimize visual impacts to the street. No raised dining areas are proposed 3.d Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 9 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx 4.7 Locate an at‐grade dining area to minimize impacts on the streetscape. At grade dining area is located in a public ROW in a street wall context, clearly defined by a railing Handrails and Enclosures 4.8 A railing shall be simple in design Proposed railing consists of simple painted metal design and is transparent in its overall character Art and Historic Properties N/A 4.9 Public art shall be compatible with the historic context No public art is proposed N/A 4.10 An art installation on a historic property shall be compatible with the resource. No art installations are proposed Site Lighting 4.11 Shield lighting to prevent off‐site glare Shielded source light fixtures utilizing cut off shielding to direct light downward are proposed 4.12 A light fixture must be in character with the setting Proposed fixtures are compatible with historic context 4.13 Use lighting to accent Lighting in used to accent building entrance, signs and to illuminate sidewalk 4.14 Minimize the visual impact of architectural lighting Proposed light fixtures are appropriate to the building and its surroundings in terms of style, finish, scale and intensity of illumination 4.15 Use shielded and focused light sources to prevent glare Proposed fixtures will be low intensity and direct light downward Service Areas 4.16 Minimize the visual impacts of a service area Service entrance and service areas are oriented toward a service lane and away from public streets 4.17 Position a service area to minimize conflicts with other abutting uses An alley is utilized for service areas. No noise impacts are anticipated Surface parking 4.18 Minimize the visual impact of surface parking Limited potential parking is oriented to the rear of the lot 3.d Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 10 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx N/A 4.19 Site a surface lot so it will minimize gaps in the continuous building wall of a commercial block Not applicable N/A 4.20 Provide a visual buffer where a surface lot abuts a public way Not applicable N/A 4.21 Provide a visual buffer along the edge of a parking lot or service area Not applicable Building Equipment 4.22 Minimize the visual impacts of building equipment on the public way and the district as a whole New rooftop equipment will be placed on the lower back portion of the building away from the primary façade. Where feasible, utility lines and junction boxes will be grouped on the rear wall. An existing gas meter on the front of the building cannot be relocated and will be painted to match the background color. 4.23 Install mechanical equipment to minimize the impacts on historic fabric New mechanical equipment will be installed on the lower back portion of the roof away from the primary façade and will not impact important architectural features Building Equipment N/A 4.24 Minimize the visual impact of security devices No security devices are anticipated N/A 4.25 Do not damage the character of the historic building when installing a security device No security devices are anticipated Color 4.26 The façade shall read as a single composition Color scheme is simple in character, using one base color for the walls and one to three accent colors for trim elements 4.27 Base or background colors shall be muted Proposed building features are muted with trim accents are contrasting color or harmonizing color. Proposed accent colors read as part of the composition. Bright, high‐intensity colors are not 3.d Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 11 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx used. Matt, low luster and non‐reflective finishes are proposed (with the exception of glazing systems) 4.28 Building elements shall be finished in a manner similar to that seen traditionally Proposed treatments include unpainted brick, integrally colored precast concrete, baked color aluminum clad wood windows and doors Archeological Resources N/A 4.29 Leave archeological resources in place, to the maximum extent feasible No archeological resources are known or anticipated V. Design Standards for New Construction Building Placement and Orientation 5.1 Maintain the alignment of building fronts along the street The proposed reconstructed façade is located to reflect the established patterns along the block and conforms to the alignment of a uniform street wall. 5.2 Maintain the traditional pattern of buildings facing the street A clearly identifiable, recessed primary entry is located to face the street Architectural Character and Detail 5.3 Design a new building to express its own time while remaining compatible with the historic district Proposed building is compatible with historic district without using mimicry or exact imitation 5.4 An interpretation of a historic style that is authentic to the district will be considered if it is subtly distinguishable as being new Proposed building is compatible with historic district without using mimicry or exact imitation 5.5 Incorporate traditional façade articulation techniques in a new design Proposed façade design includes: a tall first floor vertically proportioned upper story windows horizontal expression elements including belt course, moldings and cornice projecting vertical pilasters a similar ratio of solid wall to window area a base, middle and a cap 3.d Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 12 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx Building Mass, Scale and Height 5.6 Convey the traditional size of historic buildings in a new construction as it is perceived at street level Height of proposed building at street frontage is within the height range established in the context, and floor to floor heights appear similar to those of traditional buildings 5.7 The overall height of a new building shall be compatible with the historic district Height of propose building is compatible with the historic district N/A 5.8 Provide variation in the building height when a new building is substantially wider than historic buildings in the district Building does not significantly exceed width of other buildings in the district N/A 5.9 Maintain the scale of traditional building widths in the context Building does not significantly exceed width of other buildings in the district 5.10 Establish a sense of human scale in a building design Proposed design expresses each floor in the external skin and establishes a scale similar to historic buildings in the district. Material convey a sense of scale in their proportion, detail and form and architectural details are in scale with the building Building and Roof Forms 5.11 Use simple, rectangular building forms Proposed design uses building forms similar to traditional forms and roof forms similar to those seen traditionally in the district Entrances 5.12 Orient a primary entrance towards the street Primary entrance is oriented towards street and designed to convey a sense of scale and provide visual interest 5.13 Maintain the pattern created by recessed entryways Doors in proposed design are setback an adequate amount to establish a distinct threshold for pedestrians, and building line at the sidewalk edge is maintained by the upper floor. Transom above doorway maintains full vertical height of storefront 3.d Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 13 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx Materials 5.14 Use building materials that appear similar in scale, color, texture and finish to those seen historically in the district Proposed building materials appear similar to those seen historically in the district and proven durable and able to withstand ongoing contact with the public: modular dimension clay brick integrally colored precast concrete baked color aluminum clad wood windows and doors painted wood or composite trims painted steel Windows 5.15 A contemporary storefront design is permitted if it reinforces the visual characteristics of the district. Proposed design incorporates a ground floor storefront with transom and primary entrance using elements similar in profile and depth of detailing seen historically. A bifolding door system is proposed to allow for an open transition for patrons from the interior to the patio. This system precludes the incorporation of a traditional kickplate detail 5.16 Arrange windows to reflect the traditional rhythm and general alignment of others in the district Proposed design uses window rhythms and alignments similar to traditional buildings, such as: vertically proportioned (to the extent accommodated by the existing roof height) single or sets of punched windows sills, headers and rows of windows horizontally aligned 5.17 Use durable window materials Proposed design incorporates baked color aluminum clad wood windows (30 year finish warranty) Energy Efficiency in New Designs N/A 5.18 Locate a new building, or an addition, to take advantage of microclimate opportunities for energy conservation, while avoiding negative impacts to the historic context Remodel only is proposed – no new building or addition 3.d Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 14 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx 5.19 Design a building, or an addition, to take advantage of energy savings and generating opportunities To the extent feasible, the proposed façade renovation will increase daylighting and incorporate awnings as traditionally configured for shading Energy Efficiency in Building Massing N/A 5.20 Shape a building’s mass to maximize solar energy potential. Remodel only is proposed – no opportunity to affect building’s mass N/A 5.21 Orient a building to maximize green principles while ensuring compatibility with adjacent, lower‐scale structures. Remodel only is proposed – no opportunity to affect building’s orientation Environmental Performance in Building Elements 5.22 Use green building materials whenever possible Regionally manufactured brick and and precast elements, and low maintenance/long life span materials are proposed. 5.23 Incorporate building elements that allow for natural environmental control Operable windows are proposed for second floor; bifolding wall is proposed at ground floor storefront onto patio. New façade will be constructed using best practice insulating and air sealing methods Solar and Wind Energy Devices N/A 4.24 Minimize the visual impact of energy devices on the character of Old Town No energy devices are proposed VI. Design Standards for Signs Treatment of Historic Signs N/A 6.1 Consider history, context and design when determining whether to retain a sign. A sign shall be retained when the sign is No historic signs N/A 6.2 Leave a historic wall sign visible No historic signs N/A 6.3 Do not over restore a historic wall sign No historic signs 3.d Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 15 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx Sign Installation on a Historic Building N/A 6.4 Do not damage or obscure architectural details or other building features when installing a sign No historic building N/A 6.5 A sign shall not obscure character defining features of a historic building No historic building Design of New and Modified Signs 6.6 A sign shall be subordinate to the overall building composition Anticipated tenant signage will be oriented and designed to be subordinate to the overall building composition 6.7 Sign materials shall be compatible with the architectural character and materials of the building Anticipated tenant signage will include internally illuminated channel letters compatible with the material and color palette of the building 6.8 Use simple typeface design Anticipated tenant signage will use a single, simple, legible typeface 6.9 Use colors that contribute to legibility and design integrity Anticipated tenant signage will use limited colors that contribute to legibility and design integrity 6.10 Using a symbol for a sign is permitted Anticipated tenant signage may include a symbol in lieu of text Design of Specific Sign Types 6.11 An awning sign shall be compatible with the building An awning sign may be considered, dependent upon tenant needs N/A 6.12 Design an interpretive sign to be simple in character No interpretive sign is anticipated N/A 6.13 Mural content shall be appropriate to the district and its environs. No murals are anticipated N/A 6.14 When used, a mural shall be incorporated as an element of the overall building design No murals are anticipated N/A 6.15 The application of a mural shall not No murals are anticipated 3.d Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 16 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx damage historic materials N/A 6.16 Use a tenant panel or directory sign to consolidate small individual signs on a larger building No tenant panel or directory signs are anticipated 6.17 Design a bracket for a projecting/under‐canopy sign to complement the sign composition A projecting sign and bracket may be used to identify a sub‐tenant, such as a coffee shop 6.18 Locate a projecting/under‐canopy sign to relate to the building facade and entries A projecting sign and bracket may be used to identify a sub‐tenant, such as a coffee shop, and would be placed near the entry to relate to their location in the building N/A 6.19 Place a flush wall sign to promote design compatibility among buildings No flush wall signs are anticipated N/A 6.20 Place a flush wall sign close to the building wall. No flush wall signs are anticipated 6.21 Design a window sign to minimize the amount of window covered. If window signs are desired by the tenant, they shall be designed to minimize the amount of window covered N/A 6.22 A sign kiosk is prohibited within the district. No kiosk signs are anticipated N/A 6.23 Include a compatible, shielded light source to illuminate a sign Anticipated signage will be internally illuminated 6.24 If internal illumination is used, it shall be designed to be subordinate to the overall building composition Anticipated signage will be oriented to be subordinate to the overall building Building signage will be developed in the near future in conjunction with the tenant, with the intent that all signage conform to the above guidelines. The following are examples of typical signage utilized by this tenant on past projects which may be considered here: 3.d Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 17 2014-10-15_worksession narrative.docx Summary It is our opinion that the proposed new façade for 242 Linden Street represents an appropriate and compatible design approach that is consistent with the character of the District and surrounding buildings, including recognition of the scale, pattern and detailing of other buildings in the District. We believe the completed Project will contribute positively to the visual character of the District while modernizing the building’s structure and revitalizing the space to meet the needs of a new era of tenants and users. Sincerely, Jeffrey Errett, AIA Principal, The Architects’ Studio Attachments: Exterior Façade Studies; CONCEPT ‐ Without Awnings, 10.15.2014 Exterior Façade Studies; CONCEPT ‐ With Awnings, 10.15.2014 Exterior Façade Studies; CONCEPT ‐ PLAN, 10.15.2014 3.d Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) Exterior Facade Studies CONCEPT - Without Awnings 242 LINDEN STREET 10.15.2014 242 Linden Street East Linden Streetscape BAKED COLOR ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS AND DOORS MODULAR CLAY BRICK VENEER CAST OR BUILT-UP COMPOSITE CORNICE ORNAMENTAL STEEL, PAINTED BUILT-UP STEEL LINTEL, PAINTED PAINTED METAL PATIO RAILING INTEGRALLY COLORED PRECAST BASE SHIELDED, LOW OUTPUT LIGHT FIXTURE 3.d Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) Exterior Facade Studies CONCEPT - With Awnings 242 LINDEN STREET 10.15.2014 242 Linden Street East Linden Streetscape BAKED COLOR ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS AND DOORS MODULAR CLAY BRICK VENEER CAST OR BUILT-UP COMPOSITE CORNICE ORNAMENTAL STEEL, PAINTED BUILT-UP STEEL LINTEL, PAINTED PAINTED METAL PATIO RAILING INTEGRALLY COLORED PRECAST BASE SHIELDED, LOW OUTPUT LIGHT FIXTURE FABRIC AWNING 3.d Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) Exterior Facade Studies CONCEPT - PLAN 242 LINDEN STREET 10.15.2014 STEP DN MAIN ENTRY OUTDOOR SEATING OUTDOOR SEATING BI-FOLD DOORS BIKE RACKS STORAGE 3.d Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: 2014-10-15 Worksession Narrative (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) Agenda Item 4 Item # 4 Page 1 STAFF REPORT November 12, 2014 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME LANDMARK RESIDENCES ON MOUNTAIN, FINAL RECOMMENDATION STAFF Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for a Final Recommendation to Decision Maker on the Landmark Residences on Mountain Avenue. APPLICANT: Vaught Fry Larson Associates EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Request: The Applicant, Vaught Fry Larson Associates, is requesting a Final Recommendation to Decision Maker on its project, Landmark Residences on Mountain Avenue. This project would replace the existing gas station convenience store at 1032 W. Mountain Ave. with a mixed use building containing six single-family attached houses and a commercial/retail space planned for a coffee shop or similar tenant. Plans were previously reviewed by the Commission at its September 24 and October 22 Work Sessions. Codes and Guidelines: In its consideration of the approval of plans that contain or are adjacent to designated or individually eligible properties, the Decision Maker shall consider the written recommendation of the Landmark Preservation Commission. Codes and guidelines include Chapter 14 of the City Code, especially the review criteria in Section 14-48(b) which contains, in part, the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards; and the City’s Land Use Code, principally Section 3.4.7. These are provided in your packet. Commission Action: This is a request for a Final Recommendation on this development proposal. If the Commission desires, it may adopt a resolution providing a recommendation on the plans for consideration by the Decision Maker (in this instance, the Planning and Zoning Board). ATTACHMENTS 1. Landmark Residences on Mountain Avenue – Building Elevations_10-29-2014.pdf (PDF) 4 Packet Pg. 95 4.a Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Landmark Residences on Mountain Avenue – Building Elevations_10-29-2014.pdf (2600 : Landmark Residences on Mountain, Final Recommendation) 4.a Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Landmark Residences on Mountain Avenue – Building Elevations_10-29-2014.pdf (2600 : Landmark Residences on Mountain, Final Recommendation) Agenda Item 5 Item # 5 Page 1 STAFF REPORT November 12, 2014 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME SIGNAGE COMMEMORATING THE BUTTON HOUSE, 711 REMINGTON STREET STAFF Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Button House, located at 711 Remington Street, was demolished in January 2014. As part of the mitigation for the loss of this historic building, the City has committed to recognizing the dwelling in an appropriate manner. APPLICANT: City of Fort Collins Historic Preservation Division EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff is seeking direction for the Commission on the type of signage, and the wording, if any, for signage to commemorate the recently demolished Button House, 711 Remington Street. Following a review of various forums for recognition, staff is recommending an engraved stone paver, set into the sidewalk in front of the property. This recommendation is based upon costs, longevity, concerns about possible vandalism, and flexibility in design. Similar pavers have been installed by the City’s Streets Maintenance program, which includes repairs and improvements to sidewalks and curbs. The signs are designed by the applicant (in this instance, either the Commission or a Subcommittee of the Commission), produced locally by one of Fort Collins monument companies, and are then permanently installed by the Engineering Department. ATTACHMENTS 1. 711 Remington Colo Property Inventory Form (PDF) 5 Packet Pg. 98 5.a Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: 711 Remington Colo Property Inventory Form (2611 : Signage Commemorating the Button house, 711 Remington Street) 5.a Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: 711 Remington Colo Property Inventory Form (2611 : Signage Commemorating the Button house, 711 Remington Street) 5.a Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: 711 Remington Colo Property Inventory Form (2611 : Signage Commemorating the Button house, 711 Remington Street) 5.a Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: 711 Remington Colo Property Inventory Form (2611 : Signage Commemorating the Button house, 711 Remington Street) 5.a Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: 711 Remington Colo Property Inventory Form (2611 : Signage Commemorating the Button house, 711 Remington Street) 5.a Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: 711 Remington Colo Property Inventory Form (2611 : Signage Commemorating the Button house, 711 Remington Street) 5.a Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: 711 Remington Colo Property Inventory Form (2611 : Signage Commemorating the Button house, 711 Remington Street) 5.a Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: 711 Remington Colo Property Inventory Form (2611 : Signage Commemorating the Button house, 711 Remington Street) 5.a Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: 711 Remington Colo Property Inventory Form (2611 : Signage Commemorating the Button house, 711 Remington Street) 5.a Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: 711 Remington Colo Property Inventory Form (2611 : Signage Commemorating the Button house, 711 Remington Street) 5.a Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: 711 Remington Colo Property Inventory Form (2611 : Signage Commemorating the Button house, 711 Remington Street) Agenda Item 6 Item # 6 Page 1 STAFF REPORT November 12, 2014 Landmark Preservation Commission PROJECT NAME 2015 WORK PLAN DISCUSSION STAFF Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Discussion and Adoption of the Commission’s 2015 Work Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Landmark Preservation Commission's 2015 Work Program will contain both continuing responsibilities and new projects. This discussion is for the purpose of identifying the Commission goals for 2015, in furtherance of City Council’s objectives. ATTACHMENTS 1. LPC 2014 Work Plan rearranged by outcomes (DOCX) 2. LPC 2014 Work Plan (DOCX) 6 Packet Pg. 110 Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 970.224.6134- fax fcgov.com Planning, Development & Transportation Services MEMORANDUM TO: Wanda Nelson, City Clerk FM: Ron Sladek, Chair, Landmark Preservation Commission RE: 2015 Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) Work Program Community & Neighborhood Livability 1.2 Preserve the significant historical character of the community A priority of Council and of the Commission is historic property survey. The survey of areas containing a preponderance of older buildings and structures results in proactively identifying those individual properties and potential districts of historic and architectural significance. The Commission has identified several areas that need to be surveyed as funding allows, including: o The West Side Neighborhood, including the Loomis Addition, City Park Neighborhood and the properties along Mountain Avenue and Oak Street, which are all areas facing substantial development and infill pressures; o Properties 40 years old and older likely to be affected by development along the MAX/BRT corridor; o Properties in the area surrounding Colorado State University; and o Commercial and residential properties in the Midtown area, with an emphasis on the University Acres, Indian Hills and College Heights neighborhoods. 1.11 Maintain and enhance attractive neighborhoods through City services, innovative enforcement and voluntary compliance A priority of Council and of the Commission is historic property survey. The survey of areas containing a preponderance of older buildings and structures results in proactively identifying those individual properties and potential districts of historic and architectural significance. The Commission has identified several areas that need to be surveyed as funding allows, including: o The West Side Neighborhood, including the Loomis Addition, City Park Neighborhood and the properties along Mountain Avenue and Oak Street, which are all areas facing substantial development and infill pressures; o Properties 40 years old and older likely to be affected by development along the MAX/BRT corridor; o Properties in the area surrounding Colorado State University; and o Commercial and residential properties in the Midtown area, with an emphasis on the University Acres, Indian Hills and College Heights neighborhoods. 6.a Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: LPC 2014 Work Plan rearranged by outcomes (2604 : 2015 Work Plan Discussion) Landmark Preservation Commission 2014 Work Program Page 2 - 2 - Recreation & Culture 2.1 Improve low and moderate-income citizen access to, and participation in City programs and facilities Review applications to the Landmark Rehabilitation Loan Program. This program supports all three legs of the City’s triple bottom line. Community sustainability is promoted by enhancing the quality, livability and attractiveness of our neighborhoods; greening existing buildings is an effective tool for environmental stewardship; and financial sustainability is shown by the program’s ability to leverage funding at a ratio of nearly 1:4. Approve applicants for the Design Assistance Program, and comment upon or approve any changes to the program’s policies and guidelines. By incentivizing the use of pre-qualified professionals with experience in context-sensitive historic design, the DAP is enhancing the compatibility of alterations and new construction occurring in our historic neighborhoods. 2.4 Maintain and enhance the current culture, recreation and parks systems 2.6 Develop a clear strategic definition and description of the City’s role in the culture and arts while leveraging partnerships with other community organizations In 2014, the Commission will focus its efforts to inform and educate the community on the long-term social, environmental and economic benefits of historic preservation through: Continue community outreach by providing technical information and education on the community-wide benefits of historic preservation, and by promoting financial incentives for historic preservation. Continue the "Friends of Preservation" award program. Facilitate communication with public and private business and development entities. Facilitate the Demolition/Alteration Review process, allowing citizen input on the demolition or alteration of non-designated properties fifty years old or older. Economic Health 3.1 Align economic health goals and strategy across all levels of the organization and refine and agree upon the economic tools the City uses. Review applications to the Landmark Rehabilitation Loan Program. This program supports all three legs of the City’s triple bottom line. Community sustainability is promoted by enhancing the quality, livability and attractiveness of our neighborhoods; greening existing buildings is an effective tool for environmental stewardship; and financial sustainability is shown by the program’s ability to leverage funding at a ratio of nearly 1:4. 6.a Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: LPC 2014 Work Plan rearranged by outcomes (2604 : 2015 Work Plan Discussion) Landmark Preservation Commission 2014 Work Program Page 3 - 3 - Approve applicants for the Design Assistance Program, and comment upon or approve any changes to the program’s policies and guidelines. By incentivizing the use of pre-qualified professionals with experience in context-sensitive historic design, the DAP is enhancing the compatibility of alterations and new construction occurring in our historic neighborhoods. Community character and quality neighborhoods are enhanced by ensuring compatible alterations and infill development supported by financial and design incentives. In 2014, the Commission will review and comment on issues affecting historic properties, particularly regarding implementation of City Plan redevelopment policies. Community character and quality neighborhoods are enhanced by ensuring compatible alterations and infill development supported by financial and design incentives. In 2014, the Commission will review and comment on issues affecting historic properties, particularly regarding implementation of City Plan redevelopment policies. Economic vitality is promoted through leveraging private investment: Owners can receive back up to 70% of their costs for renovation, leading to further reinvestment and more disposable income. In 2014, the Commission will continue its promotion of the nine existing incentive programs, and will investigate adding additional financial incentives for historic preservation. 3.7 Support sustainable infill and redevelopment to meet climate action strategies The Commission has requested that staff pursue funding to develop design guidelines and/or pattern books for new and infill construction in areas adjacent to historic districts and properties. 3.8 Preserve the City’s sense of place The Commission’s primary focus is on implementing the goals and actions identified as priorities by Council as a result of the recent Historic Preservation Improvements Study. The Commission has requested that staff pursue funding to develop design guidelines and/or pattern books for new and infill construction in areas adjacent to historic districts and properties. The Commission has requested that staff pursue a study of an expansion of the Old Town Historic District, to provide financial incentives to the numerous designated and eligible historic properties in the Downtown Commercial Center that are already subject to Historic Preservation restrictions. Evaluate applications for individual and district landmark designation, and provide recommendations on eligibility to Council. At the end of 2013, Fort Collins could boast 264 Fort Collins Landmarks, 15 properties listed on the State Register, and 734 properties listed on both the National and State Registers. 3.9 Provide transparent, predictable and efficient processes for citizens and businesses interacting with the City Participate in Complimentary Design Reviews of additions, alterations and infill construction in the core neighborhoods, helping owners and developers identify design issues at the preliminary stages of planning, and providing education and awareness of incentives to encourage compatible design. Final decision-making authority for design review of designated landmark buildings. In 2013, the Commission heard 42 proposals for significant alterations and additions to Landmark properties. 6.a Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: LPC 2014 Work Plan rearranged by outcomes (2604 : 2015 Work Plan Discussion) Landmark Preservation Commission 2014 Work Program Page 4 - 4 - Environmental Health 4.4 Reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions by creating a built environment focused on green building and mobile emissions reductions 4.6 Engage citizens in ways to educate and change behavior toward more sustainable living practices The Commission has requested that staff pursue funding to develop design guidelines and/or pattern books for new and infill construction in areas adjacent to historic districts and properties. The adaptive re-use of historic buildings and the greening of existing buildings are effective tools for environmental stewardship. Many older buildings are remarkably energy efficient because of their site sensitivity, quality of construction, and use of passive heating and cooling, and can go green without compromising historic character. Renovating an existing building creates 30-50% less carbon emissions than new construction. In 2014, the Commission will participate in and provide funding towards model projects that promote sustainable historic preservation practices. High Performing Government 7.1 Improve organizational capability and effectiveness–professional development, leadership, change management, strategic thinking, fiscal literacy and staff engagement In 2014, the Commission will reaffirm its high standards for professionalism through ongoing training and education. Attendance at professional conferences and workshops, including Colorado Preservation Inc.’s annual conference, will be encouraged of all Commission members. Additionally, in 2014, several Commission members will be attending the 2014 National Alliance of Preservation Commissioner bi-annual conference, which offers valuable training and networking opportunities with historic commissions across the nation. cc: Landmark Preservation Commission Members Gino Campana, Council Liaison Darin Atteberry, City Manager Karen Cumbo, PDT Director Laurie Kadrich, CDNS Director 6.a Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: LPC 2014 Work Plan rearranged by outcomes (2604 : 2015 Work Plan Discussion) Landmark Preservation Commission 2014 Work Program Page 5 - 5 - 6.a Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: LPC 2014 Work Plan rearranged by outcomes (2604 : 2015 Work Plan Discussion) Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 970.224.6134- fax fcgov.com Planning, Development & Transportation Services MEMORANDUM TO: Wanda Nelson, City Clerk FM: Ron Sladek, Chair, Landmark Preservation Commission RE: 2014 Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) Work Program In 2013, the Commission’s primary focus was on implementing the goals and actions resulting from the Historic Preservation Program Process Improvements Study, and aligning these improvements with the Historic Resources Preservation Program Plan, an element of City Plan. Previously, the Commission had identified as a priority the development of updated design standards for the Old Town Historic District. A State Historic Fund grant for this purpose was sought and received by Historic Preservation staff, and the project is currently underway. 2013 also marked the first full year of two re-instated preservation-related programs: the popular Design Assistance Program, which provides professional consultation on context sensitive design; and Voluntary Design Review offered to property owners by a subcommittee of the Commission. The Commission is already seeing the benefits of these two programs, in the quality of new design proposals for additions and alterations in the historic core neighborhoods. The Landmark Preservation Commission's 2014 Work Program consists of both continuing responsibilities and new projects. For 2014, the Commission has identified these goals to further City Council objectives: The Commission’s primary focus is on implementing the goals and actions identified as priorities by Council as a result of the recent Historic Preservation Improvements Study. A priority of Council and of the Commission is historic property survey. The survey of areas containing a preponderance of older buildings and structures results in proactively identifying those individual properties and potential districts of historic and architectural significance. The Commission has identified several areas that need to be surveyed as funding allows, including: o The West Side Neighborhood, including the Loomis Addition, City Park Neighborhood and the properties along Mountain Avenue and Oak Street, which are all areas facing substantial development and infill pressures; o Properties 40 years old and older likely to be affected by development along the MAX/BRT corridor; o Properties in the area surrounding Colorado State University; and o Commercial and residential properties in the Midtown area, with an emphasis on the University Acres, Indian Hills and College Heights neighborhoods. The Commission has requested that staff pursue funding to develop design guidelines and/or pattern books for new and infill construction in areas adjacent to historic districts and properties. 6.b Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: LPC 2014 Work Plan (2604 : 2015 Work Plan Discussion) Landmark Preservation Commission 2014 Work Program Page 2 - 2 - The Commission has requested that staff pursue a study of an expansion of the Old Town Historic District, to provide financial incentives to the numerous designated and eligible historic properties in the Downtown Commercial Center which are already subject to Historic Preservation restrictions. Additional ongoing and special projects which will require Landmark Preservation Commission involvement in 2014 include: Incentives: Review applications to the Landmark Rehabilitation Loan Program. This program supports all three legs of the City’s triple bottom line. Community sustainability is promoted by enhancing the quality, livability and attractiveness of our neighborhoods; greening existing buildings is an effective tool for environmental stewardship; and financial sustainability is shown by the program’s ability to leverage funding at a ratio of nearly 1:4. Approve applicants for the Design Assistance Program, and comment upon or approve any changes to the program’s policies and guidelines. By incentivizing the use of pre-qualified professionals with experience in context-sensitive historic design, the DAP is enhancing the compatibility of alterations and new construction occurring in our historic neighborhoods. Participate in Complimentary Design Reviews of additions, alterations and infill construction in the core neighborhoods, helping owners and developers identify design issues at the preliminary stages of planning, and providing education and awareness of incentives to encourage compatible design. Landmark Designation and Design Review of Landmark Properties: Evaluate applications for individual and district landmark designation, and provide recommendations on eligibility to Council. At the end of 2013, Fort Collins could boast 264 Fort Collins Landmarks, 15 properties listed on the State Register, and 734 properties listed on both the National and State Registers. Final decision-making authority for design review of designated landmark buildings. In 2013, the Commission heard 42 proposals for significant alterations and additions to Landmark properties. Planning: Community character and quality neighborhoods are enhanced by ensuring compatible alterations and infill development supported by financial and design incentives. In 2014, the Commission will review and comment on issues affecting historic properties, particularly regarding implementation of City Plan redevelopment policies. Economic vitality is promoted through leveraging private investment: Owners can receive back up to 70% of their costs for renovation, leading to further reinvestment and more disposable income. In 2014, the Commission will continue its promotion of the nine existing incentive programs, and will investigate adding additional financial incentives for historic preservation. 6.b Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: LPC 2014 Work Plan (2604 : 2015 Work Plan Discussion) Landmark Preservation Commission 2014 Work Program Page 3 - 3 - The adaptive re-use of historic buildings and the greening of existing buildings are effective tools for environmental stewardship. Many older buildings are remarkably energy efficient because of their site sensitivity, quality of construction, and use of passive heating and cooling, and can go green without compromising historic character. Renovating an existing building creates 30-50% less carbon emissions than new construction. In 2014, the Commission will participate in and provide funding towards model projects that promote sustainable historic preservation practices. Education and Awareness: In 2014, the Commission will focus its efforts to inform and educate the community on the long-term social, environmental and economic benefits of historic preservation through: Continue community outreach by providing technical information and education on the community-wide benefits of historic preservation, and by promoting financial incentives for historic preservation. Continue the "Friends of Preservation" award program. Facilitate communication with public and private business and development entities. Facilitate the Demolition/Alteration Review process, allowing citizen input on the demolition or alteration of non-designated properties fifty years old or older. Training: In 2014, the Commission will reaffirm its high standards for professionalism through ongoing training and education. Attendance at professional conferences and workshops, including Colorado Preservation Inc.’s annual conference, will be encouraged of all Commission members. Additionally, in 2014, several Commission members will be attending the 2014 National Alliance of Preservation Commissioner bi-annual conference, which offers valuable training and networking opportunities with historic commissions across the nation. cc: Landmark Preservation Commission Members Gino Campana, Council Liaison Darin Atteberry, City Manager Karen Cumbo, PDT Director Laurie Kadrich, CDNS Director 6.b Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: LPC 2014 Work Plan (2604 : 2015 Work Plan Discussion) STRINGERS, HANDRAIL AND GRUADRAIL. REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISHES. 2 STEEL FABRICATED RAILING DESIGN T.B.D., (CONTRACTOR TO CARRY ALLOWANCE OF $225 PER LINEAR FOOT TO INCLUDE GUARDRAILS, HANDRAILS AND ALL SUPPORTS AND FINISH) 3 PROVIDE NEW 5" REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE AT AREAS REMOVED FOR EXTENT OF NEW WORK - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, PROVIDE SAWCUT CONTROL JOINTS PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND AS INDICATED. (NOTE: CONDITION OF EXISTING SLAB ON GRADE IS UNKNOWN THEREFORE SCOPE OF NEW SLAB IS UNDETERMINED AT THE TIME OF THIS DRAWING ISSUE.) 4 PROPOSED NEW SKYLIGHT - KALWAL SELF SUPPORTING RIDGE ROOF SKYLIGHT 6' X 20' OUTSIDE CURB DIMENSIONS (PANEL LAYOUT AND TRANSLUCENT COLOR T.B.D.) , PROVIDE NEW OPENING AND CURB PER MFR REQUIREMENTS, FLASH AND TIE IN TO EXISTING ROOF MEMBRANE AS REQ'D. RE: STRUCTURAL FOR FRAMING 5 NEW ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNITS & DUCTING, REFER TO MECHANICAL. 6 PROPOSED NEW SECOND FLOOR SYSTEM - STEEL FRAMING WITH CONCRETE ON METAL DECK, REFER TO STRUCTURAL. 7 REPLACE EXISTING DOMED SKYLIGHTS WITH NEW TO MATCH EXISTING SIZE AND CONFIGURATION, (1) 5' X 4', (2) 2' X 4' - VERIFY EXACT SIZES. GLAZING MATERIAL T.B.D. 8 EXISTING SECOND FLOOR TO REMAIN (ROUGH SAWN 2X10 WOOD JOISTS WITH T&G DECKING), REPAIR FLOOR SHEATHING AND INSTALL GYP. CRETE TOPPING, RE: STRUCTURAL. ARCHITECTURAL PARTITION TYPES Wall above Ceiling P-01 FURRED WALL AT EXISTING CMU EXTERIOR WALL - 3 5/8" 25 GA. METAL STUDS AT 16" O.C. FROM FLOOR TO STRUCTURE ABOVE WITH R-13 THERMAL INSULATION AND ONE LAYER OF 5/8" GYP. BD. ON EXPOSED SIDE, PROVIDE 1/2" GAP BETWEEN NEW FURRED WALL AND EXISTING CMU, REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISHES P-02 LIFT SHAFT WALL - 3 5/8" 20 GA. METAL STUDS AT 16" O.C. FROM FLOOR TO STRUCTURE ABOVE WITH R-13 THERMAL INSULATION AND ONE LAYER OF 5/8" GYP. BD. ON EXPOSED SIDE, PROVIDE 1/2" GAP BETWEEN NEW FURRED WALL AND EXISTING CMU, REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISHES ARCHITECTURAL WALL TYPES (E) W-01 MAIN WALL - 3 5/8" BRICK VENEER WITH 1 5/8" GAP ON CONTINUOUS CAVITY INSULATION (DOW CAVITY MATE R7.5 MIN. OR EQUAL) ON FLUID APPLIED AIR WEATHER BARRIER ON 5/8" GLASS MATT GYP. SHEATHING ON 6" METAL STUDS WITH R-13 THERMAL BATT INSULATION AND 5/8" TYPE X GYP. BD. INTERIOR, RE: STRUCTURAL W-02 PILASTER - 3 5/8" BRICK VENEER WITH 3 5/8" GAP ON CONTINUOUS CAVITY INSULATION (DOW CAVITY MATE R7.5 MIN. OR EQUAL) ON FLUID APPLIED AIR WEATHER BARRIER ON 5/8" GLASS MATT GYP. SHEATHING ON 6" METAL STUDS WITH R-13 THERMAL BATT INSULATION AND 5/8" TYPE X GYP. BD. INTERIOR, RE: STRUCTURAL W-03 8" X 8" X 16" CMU, PRECISION FACE, RE: STRUCTURAL SECTION GENERAL NOTES: WALL AND PARTITION TYPES: 3/16" = 1'-0" A3.02 BUILDING SECTION 1 3/16" = 1'-0" A3.02 BUILDING SECTION 2 3.c Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: 2014-10-31_Progress Drawings (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) P-01 W-03 (E) 6 7 FIRST FLOOR EL. = 100' - 0" FIRST FLOOR EL. = 100' - 0" T.O. SHEATHING (E) EL. = 113' - 1 1/4" A B C D E F 1 A3.02 B.O. FRAMING (E) LOW ROOF EL. = 120' - 2" T.O. (N) PARAPET LOW EL. = 127' - 4" T.O. STEEL (N) 2ND FLOOR EL. = 110' - 8" A.1 STEP EL. = 99' - 5" T.O. STOREFRONT EL. = 112' - 0" 2 A3.02 2 2 12 3 7 6 13 W-02 P-01 (E) Issued For SD: Plot Date Issued For DD: Issued For Permit: Issued For Construction: 10/31/14 10/31/2014 4:17:42 PM A3.01 BUILDING SECTIONS 242 Linden - Galvanize 242 Linden Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 14-378 3/16" = 1'-0" A3.01 BUILDING SECTION 2 3/16" = 1'-0" A3.01 BUILDING SECTION 1 3/16" = 1'-0" A3.01 BUILDING SECTION 3 Revision Number Revision Date BUILDING SECTION KEYNOTES: 1 1 PROPOSED PLATFORM LIFT - GENISIS GARAVENTA GVL 168 SHAFT STYLE WITH 3" PIT WITH LEAD SCREW DRIVE SYSTEM. STANDARD PLATFORM SIZE WITH STRAIGHT THROUGH (180 DEG.) CONFIGURATION. DOORS AT FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL SHAFT BY OTHERS, PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY OPERATIONAL AND SECURITY INTERLOCKS PER MFR. VERIFY HOISTWAY DIMENSIONS, OPENING SIZES WITH MANUFACTURER. 2 NEW ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNITS & DUCTING, REFER TO MECHANICAL. 3 NEW METAL PANEL UNINSULATED SHED ROOF SYSTEM (BERRIDGE M OR R PANEL, OR EQUAL) 2:12 SLOPE, OVER STEEL PURLINS, FLASH TO EXISTING CMU WALL PER PANEL MFR. RECOMMENDED DETAILS, COLOR T.B.D., REFER TO STRUCTURAL COLUMN AND ROOF FRAMING. 4 STEEL FABRICATED RAILING DESIGN T.B.D., (CONTRACTOR TO CARRY ALLOWANCE OF $225 PER LINEAR FOOT TO INCLUDE GUARDRAILS, HANDRAILS AND ALL SUPPORTS AND FINISH) 5 CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PAN STAIR WITH PERFORATED METAL RISERS, CHANNEL STRINGERS, HANDRAIL AND GRUADRAIL. REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISHES. 6 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING GUTTER SYSTEM AND (2) DOWNSPOUTS WITH NEW PREFINISHED BOX GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS, FINISH TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL COLOR. 7 INSTALL GUTTER SYSTEM AND (2) DOWNSPOUTS WITH NEW PREFINISHED BOX GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS, FINISH TO MATCH ROOF PANEL COLOR. 8 8' CHAIN LINK FENCE ENCLOSURE WITH 3'-6" LOCKING GATE. 9 BIKE RACKS - DEURO ULTRA SPACE SAVER, FLOOR STANDING SINGLE SIDED, 24 SPACES SHOWN. 10 PROPOSED NEW SKYLIGHT - KALWAL SELF SUPPORTING RIDGE ROOF SKYLIGHT 6' X 20' OUTSIDE CURB DIMENSIONS (PANEL LAYOUT AND TRANSLUCENT COLOR T.B.D.) , PROVIDE NEW OPENING AND CURB PER MFR REQUIREMENTS, FLASH AND TIE IN TO EXISTING ROOF MEMBRANE AS REQ'D. RE: STRUCTURAL FOR FRAMING 11 REPLACE EXISTING DOMED SKYLIGHTS WITH NEW TO MATCH EXISTING SIZE AND CONFIGURATION, (1) 5' X 4', (2) 2' X 4' - VERIFY EXACT SIZES. GLAZING MATERIAL T.B.D. 12 ROOF LADDER WITH SAFTEY CAGE AND OVER ROOF RAIL EXTENTIONS - FABRICATED STEEL OR PREMANUFACTURED, 22'-0" +/- ACCESS HEIGHT, PROVIDE LOCKING SECURITY PANEL AT BASE, LADDER TO COMPLY WITH ALL JURSDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS, PAINT IF REQUIRED. 13 CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STAIR, WITH STEEL HANDRAIL, PAINT. ARCHITECTURAL PARTITION TYPES Wall above Ceiling P-01 FURRED WALL AT EXISTING CMU EXTERIOR WALL - 3 5/8" 25 GA. METAL STUDS AT 16" O.C. FROM FLOOR TO STRUCTURE ABOVE WITH R-13 THERMAL INSULATION AND ONE LAYER OF 5/8" GYP. BD. ON EXPOSED SIDE, PROVIDE 1/2" GAP BETWEEN NEW FURRED WALL AND EXISTING CMU, REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISHES P-02 LIFT SHAFT WALL - 3 5/8" 20 GA. METAL STUDS AT 16" O.C. FROM FLOOR TO STRUCTURE ABOVE WITH R-13 THERMAL INSULATION AND ONE LAYER OF 5/8" GYP. BD. ON EXPOSED SIDE, PROVIDE 1/2" GAP BETWEEN NEW FURRED WALL AND EXISTING CMU, REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISHES ARCHITECTURAL WALL TYPES (E) W-01 MAIN WALL - 3 5/8" BRICK VENEER WITH 1 5/8" GAP ON CONTINUOUS CAVITY INSULATION (DOW CAVITY MATE R7.5 MIN. OR EQUAL) ON FLUID APPLIED AIR WEATHER BARRIER ON 5/8" GLASS MATT GYP. SHEATHING ON 6" METAL STUDS WITH R-13 THERMAL BATT INSULATION AND 5/8" TYPE X GYP. BD. INTERIOR, RE: STRUCTURAL W-02 PILASTER - 3 5/8" BRICK VENEER WITH 3 5/8" GAP ON CONTINUOUS CAVITY INSULATION (DOW CAVITY MATE R7.5 MIN. OR EQUAL) ON FLUID APPLIED AIR WEATHER BARRIER ON 5/8" GLASS MATT GYP. SHEATHING ON 6" METAL STUDS WITH R-13 THERMAL BATT INSULATION AND 5/8" TYPE X GYP. BD. INTERIOR, RE: STRUCTURAL W-03 8" X 8" X 16" CMU, PRECISION FACE, RE: STRUCTURAL SECTION GENERAL NOTES: WALL AND PARTITION TYPES: 3.c Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: 2014-10-31_Progress Drawings (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) MARK DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER COLOR FINISH DIMENSIONS/PATTERN MASONRY (E) CMU BLOCK WALL COLOR T.B.D SHERLASTIC ELASTOMERIC COATING MA-01 BRICK VENEER GENERAL SHALE (ROBINSON BRICK) COLOR T.B.D 3 5/8" D. X 2 1/4" H. X 7 5/8" L. MA-02 CMU COLOR T.B.D PRECISION FACE - EXPOSED 16"X8"X8" PC-01 PRECAST CONCRETE COLOR T.B.D ACID ETCHED Revision Number Revision Date 1 1 PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING EXTERIOR FACE OF CMU WALL AS REQ'D AND APPLY ELASTOMERIC COATING (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERLASTIC OR EQUAL) TO ALL EXPOSED AREAS, COLOR T.B.D. 2 NEW PREFINISHED WALL COPING TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL FINISH INSTALLED ON EXISTING CMU PARAPET, REPAIR TOP OF WALL AS REQ'D TO RECEIVE NEW COPING. 3 ROOF LADDER WITH SAFTEY CAGE AND OVER ROOF RAIL EXTENTIONS - FABRICATED STEEL OR PREMANUFACTURED, 22'-0" +/- ACCESS HEIGHT, PROVIDE LOCKING SECURITY PANEL AT BASE, LADDER TO COMPLY WITH ALL JURSDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS, PAINT IF REQUIRED. 4 NEW METAL PANEL UNINSULATED SHED ROOF SYSTEM (BERRIDGE M OR R PANEL, OR EQUAL) 2:12 SLOPE, OVER STEEL PURLINS, FLASH TO EXISTING CMU WALL PER PANEL MFR. RECOMMENDED DETAILS, COLOR T.B.D., REFER TO STRUCTURAL COLUMN AND ROOF FRAMING. 5 EXISTING UTILITY POLE. 6 INSTALL GUTTER SYSTEM AND (2) DOWNSPOUTS WITH NEW PREFINISHED BOX GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS, FINISH TO MATCH ROOF PANEL COLOR. 7 CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STAIR, WITH STEEL HANDRAIL, PAINT. 3.c Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: 2014-10-31_Progress Drawings (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) T.O. (N) PARAPET HIGH EL. = 129' - 4" STEP EL. = 99' - 5" T.O. STOREFRONT EL. = 112' - 0" T.O. STOREFRONT DOOR EL. = 108' - 0" 3 A3.01 MA-01 BRICK VENEER COLOR T.B.D PC-01 PRECAST CONCRETE COLOR T.B.D PC-01 PRECAST CONCRETE COLOR T.B.D PC-01 PRECAST CONCRETE COLOR T.B.D PC-01 PRECAST CONCRETE COLOR T.B.D PT-02 PAINTED TRIM COLOR T.B.D. PTE-01 PAINTED A.E.S.S. COLOR T.B.D. PC-01 PRECAST CONCRETE COLOR T.B.D EL. = 124' - 0" +/- 2'-0" +/- 1'-5" 15 15 16 15 16 16 17 17 17 18 17 17 17 19 20 TYP. TYP. 21 23 22 24 21 21 21 23 25 26 27 28 TYP. NOTE: SEE PLAN NOTE: SEE PLAN FOR PATIO RAIL FOR PATIO RAIL 29 Issued For SD: Plot Date Issued For DD: Issued For Permit: Issued For Construction: 10/31/14 10/31/2014 4:17:21 PM A2.11 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 242 Linden - Galvanize 242 Linden Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 14-378 1/4" = 1'-0" A2.11 EAST ELEVATION 2 1/4" = 1'-0" A2.11 WEST ELEVATION 1 ELEVATION KEYNOTES: 0' 2' 4' 8' 16' 0' 2' 4' 8' 16' MATERIAL LEGEND - EXTERIOR IDENTITY DATA BASIS OF DESIGN PRODUCT DATA MARK DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER COLOR FINISH DIMENSIONS/PATTERN MASONRY (E) CMU BLOCK WALL COLOR T.B.D SHERLASTIC ELASTOMERIC COATING MA-01 BRICK VENEER GENERAL SHALE (ROBINSON BRICK) COLOR T.B.D 3 5/8" D. X 2 1/4" H. X 7 5/8" L. MA-02 CMU COLOR T.B.D PRECISION FACE - EXPOSED 16"X8"X8" PC-01 PRECAST CONCRETE COLOR T.B.D ACID ETCHED 1 18 DOUBLE HUNG MULLED WINDOW UNIT - INDIVIDUAL UNIT SIZE 3'-4" X 6'-0", EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOW (SIERRA PACIFIC OR EQUAL), GLAZING TYPE AND COLOR T.B.D. 19 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST LINTEL, EXTEND 4" BEYOND OPENING EACH SIDE, PROVIDE INTEGRAL DRIP. 20 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST SILL WITH INTEGRAL DRIP EDGE. 21 FABRICATED STEEL CHANNEL LINTEL WITH FRETWORK, . FABRICATE AS A.E.S.S., SHOP PREP, GALVANIZE AND FIELD PAINT. (FINAL DESIGN T.B.D.) 22 INSWING BIFOLD ALUMINUM CLAD DOOR SYSTEM WITH ALUMINUM CLAD FIXED TRANSOM WINDOWS SYSTEM WITH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL STEEL REINFORCING MEMBERS (SIERRA PACIFIC OR EQUAL) WITH ADA SILL, 4 PANELS FOLDING TO THE LEFT AND 1 ENTRY PANEL ON THE RIGHT, COLOR AND GLAZING T.B.D. 23 COMMERCIAL ENTRY DOOR WITH MULLED ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOW SYSTEM WITH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL STEEL REINFORCING MEMBERS (SIERRA PACIFIC OR EQUAL) WITH ADA SILL, COLOR AND GLAZING T.B.D. 24 FABRICATED STEEL FRETWORK, ROLLED CHANNEL ARCH, FABRICATE AS A.E.S.S., SHOP PREP, GALVANIZE AND FIELD PAINT. (FINAL DESIGN T.B.D.) 25 ALUMINUM CLAD FIXED DOOR PANEL TO MATCH ADJACENT BIFOLD DOOR WITH ALUMINUM CLAD TRANSOM WINDOWS SYSTEM WITH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL STEEL REINFORCING MEMBERS (SIERRA PACIFIC OR EQUAL), COLOR AND GLAZING T.B.D. 26 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST ACCENT, SET IN BRICK. 27 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST ACCENT BAND SET IN BRICK. 28 WALL MOUNT LIGHT FIXTURE, TYPE AND STYLE T.B.D. 29 WHERE STOREFRONT STEPS IN AT CENTER ENTRY PROVIDE PREFINISHED METAL PANEL SOFFIT TO MATCH ADJACENT WINDOW SYSTEM. 30 EXISTING UTILITY POLE. 1 ROOF LADDER WITH SAFTEY CAGE AND OVER ROOF RAIL EXTENTIONS - FABRICATED STEEL OR PREMANUFACTURED, 22'-0" +/- ACCESS HEIGHT, PROVIDE LOCKING SECURITY PANEL AT BASE, LADDER TO COMPLY WITH ALL JURSDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS, PAINT IF REQUIRED. 2 PROPOSED NEW SKYLIGHT - KALWAL SELF SUPPORTING RIDGE ROOF SKYLIGHT 6' X 20' OUTSIDE CURB DIMENSIONS (PANEL LAYOUT AND TRANSLUCENT COLOR T.B.D.) , PROVIDE NEW OPENING AND CURB PER MFR REQUIREMENTS, FLASH AND TIE IN TO EXISTING ROOF MEMBRANE AS REQ'D. RE: STRUCTURAL FOR FRAMING 3 NEW ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNITS & DUCTING, REFER TO MECHANICAL. 4 DOUBLE HUNG MULLED WINDOW UNIT, APPROXIMATE SIZE OF EXISTING OPENING 5'-4" X 5'-4", EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOW, PREPARE EXISTING OPENING FOR INSTALLATION, GLAZING TYPE AND COLOR T.B.D. 5 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING GUTTER SYSTEM AND (2) DOWNSPOUTS WITH NEW PREFINISHED BOX GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS, FINISH TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL COLOR. 6 INSTALL GUTTER SYSTEM AND (2) DOWNSPOUTS WITH NEW PREFINISHED BOX GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS, FINISH TO MATCH ROOF PANEL COLOR. 7 EXISTING HOLLOW METAL DOOR, VERIFY CONDITION, PREPARE AND REPAINT DOOR AND FRAME INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR, REPLACE HARDWARE AS REQ'D BY TENANT. REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISH. 8 8' CHAIN LINK FENCE ENCLOSURE WITH 3'-6" LOCKING GATE. 9 BIKE RACKS - DEURO ULTRA SPACE SAVER, FLOOR STANDING SINGLE SIDED, 24 SPACES SHOWN. 10 NEW 1:12 RAMP, CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE WITH RAIL. 11 PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING EXTERIOR FACE OF CMU WALL AS REQ'D AND APPLY ELASTOMERIC COATING (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERLASTIC OR EQUAL) TO ALL EXPOSED AREAS, COLOR T.B.D. 12 CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STAIR, WITH STEEL HANDRAIL, PAINT. 13 NEW METAL PANEL UNINSULATED SHED ROOF SYSTEM (BERRIDGE M OR R PANEL, OR EQUAL) 2:12 SLOPE, OVER STEEL PURLINS, FLASH TO EXISTING CMU WALL PER PANEL MFR. RECOMMENDED DETAILS, COLOR T.B.D., REFER TO STRUCTURAL COLUMN AND ROOF FRAMING. 14 PROPOSED NEW ELEVATED CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE ON PREPARED SUBGRADE, REFER TO STRUCTURAL FOR FOUNDATION AND REINFORCING REQUIREMENTS - PROVIDE SAWCUT CONTROL JOINTS PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND AS INDICATED. 15 WOOD OR COMPOSIT TRIM ON METAL STUD FRAMING, PAINT. 16 NEW PREFINISHED WALL COPING TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL FINISH INSTALLED ON NEW PARAPET CORNICE. 17 DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW UNIT, UNIT SIZE 3'-4" X 6'-0", EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOW (SIERRA PACIFIC OR EQUAL), GLAZING TYPE AND COLOR T.B.D. Revision Number Revision Date 3.c Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: 2014-10-31_Progress Drawings (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) (NIC) EXISTING BUILDING (NIC) 10'-0" 55'-11 1/2" EXISTING BALCONY (NIC) EXISTING STAIRS (NIC) EXISTING STAIRS (NIC) Issued For SD: Plot Date Issued For DD: Issued For Permit: Issued For Construction: 10/31/14 10/31/2014 4:16:44 PM A1.31 ROOF PLAN 242 Linden - Galvanize 242 Linden Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 14-378 1/8" = 1'-0" A1.31 ROOF PLAN 1 0' 4' 8' 16' 32' ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES: 1 1 PROPOSED NEW SKYLIGHT - KALWAL SELF SUPPORTING RIDGE ROOF SKYLIGHT 6' X 20' OUTSIDE CURB DIMENSIONS (PANEL LAYOUT AND TRANSLUCENT COLOR T.B.D.) , PROVIDE NEW OPENING AND CURB PER MFR REQUIREMENTS, FLASH AND TIE IN TO EXISTING ROOF MEMBRANE AS REQ'D. RE: STRUCTURAL FOR FRAMING 2 ROOF LADDER WITH SAFTEY CAGE AND OVER ROOF RAIL EXTENTIONS - FABRICATED STEEL OR PREMANUFACTURED, 22'-0" +/- ACCESS HEIGHT, PROVIDE LOCKING SECURITY PANEL AT BASE, LADDER TO COMPLY WITH ALL JURSDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS, PAINT IF REQUIRED. 3 NEW PREFINISHED WALL COPING TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL FINISH INSTALLED ON EXISTING CMU PARAPET, REPAIR TOP OF WALL AS REQ'D TO RECEIVE NEW COPING. FLASH AND CLOSE GAP (APPROX. - 1 1/2" GAP) BETWEEN AJDACENT BUILDING WALL AND NEW COPING. 4 NEW PREFINISHED WALL COPING TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL FINISH INSTALLED ON EXISTING CMU PARAPET, REPAIR TOP OF WALL AS REQ'D TO RECEIVE NEW COPING. 5 NEW METAL PANEL UNINSULATED SHED ROOF SYSTEM (BERRIDGE M OR R PANEL, OR EQUAL) 2:12 SLOPE, OVER STEEL PURLINS, FLASH TO EXISTING CMU WALL PER PANEL MFR. RECOMMENDED DETAILS, COLOR T.B.D., REFER TO STRUCTURAL COLUMN AND ROOF FRAMING. 6 INSTALL GUTTER SYSTEM AND (2) DOWNSPOUTS WITH NEW PREFINISHED BOX GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS, FINISH TO MATCH ROOF PANEL COLOR. 7 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING GUTTER SYSTEM AND (2) DOWNSPOUTS WITH NEW PREFINISHED BOX GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS, FINISH TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL COLOR. 8 NEW ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNITS & DUCTING, REFER TO MECHANICAL. 9 REPLACE EXISTING DOMED SKYLIGHTS WITH NEW TO MATCH EXISTING SIZE AND CONFIGURATION, (1) 5' X 4', (2) 2' X 4' - VERIFY EXACT SIZES. GLAZING MATERIAL T.B.D. 10 NEW PREFINISHED WALL COPING TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL FINISH INSTALLED ON NEW PARAPET CORNICE. 11 CUT BACK EXISTING ROOFING MEMBRANE AS REQ'D FOR NEW WORK. INSTALL DECKING, INSULATION AND ROOFING MEMBRANE AND TIE IN TO EXISTING MEMBRAND PER MFR. RECOMMENDED DETAILS. NOTE: FULLY ADHERE MEMBRANE TO ALL VERTICAL SURFACES. 12 CUT BACK EXISTING ROOFING MEMBRANE AS REQ'D TO REMOVE EXISTING ROOF HATCH AND ASSOCIATED FRAMING. INSTALL DECKING, INSULATION AND ROOFING MEMBRANE AND TIE IN TO EXISTING MEMBRANE PER MFR. RECOMMENDED DETAILS. 13 EXISTING ROOFING MEMBRANE TO REMAIN - INSTALL DECKING, INSULATION, ROOFING MEMBRANE AND TIE IN TO EXISTING MEMBRANE PER MFR. RECOMMENDED DETAILS AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE EQUIPMENT IS REMOVED OR PENETRATIONS ARE ABANDONED. SEAL ALL NEW PENETRATIONS THRU EXISTING ROOFING MEMBRANE PER MEMBRANE MFR. RECOMMENDED DETAILS. ROOF PLAN GENERAL NOTES: ARCHITECTURAL PARTITION TYPES Wall above Ceiling P-01 FURRED WALL AT EXISTING CMU EXTERIOR WALL - 3 5/8" 25 GA. METAL STUDS AT 16" O.C. FROM FLOOR TO STRUCTURE ABOVE WITH R-13 THERMAL INSULATION AND ONE LAYER OF 5/8" GYP. BD. ON EXPOSED SIDE, PROVIDE 1/2" GAP BETWEEN NEW FURRED WALL AND EXISTING CMU, REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISHES P-02 LIFT SHAFT WALL - 3 5/8" 20 GA. METAL STUDS AT 16" O.C. FROM FLOOR TO STRUCTURE ABOVE WITH R-13 THERMAL INSULATION AND ONE LAYER OF 5/8" GYP. BD. ON EXPOSED SIDE, PROVIDE 1/2" GAP BETWEEN NEW FURRED WALL AND EXISTING CMU, REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISHES ARCHITECTURAL WALL TYPES (E) W-01 MAIN WALL - 3 5/8" BRICK VENEER WITH 1 5/8" GAP ON CONTINUOUS CAVITY INSULATION (DOW CAVITY MATE R7.5 MIN. OR EQUAL) ON FLUID APPLIED AIR WEATHER BARRIER ON 5/8" GLASS MATT GYP. SHEATHING ON 6" METAL STUDS WITH R-13 THERMAL BATT INSULATION AND 5/8" TYPE X GYP. BD. INTERIOR, RE: STRUCTURAL W-02 PILASTER - 3 5/8" BRICK VENEER WITH 3 5/8" GAP ON CONTINUOUS CAVITY INSULATION (DOW CAVITY MATE R7.5 MIN. OR EQUAL) ON FLUID APPLIED AIR WEATHER BARRIER ON 5/8" GLASS MATT GYP. SHEATHING ON 6" METAL STUDS WITH R-13 THERMAL BATT INSULATION AND 5/8" TYPE X GYP. BD. INTERIOR, RE: STRUCTURAL W-03 8" X 8" X 16" CMU, PRECISION FACE, RE: STRUCTURAL WALL AND PARTITION TYPES: Revision Number Revision Date 3.c Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: 2014-10-31_Progress Drawings (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) 44 5 10'-0" 3'-6" 13'-6" 5'-11 7/8" 14'-8" 7'-2 3/4" 19'-0" 6'-0" 9'-5 7/8" 62'-4 1/2" 10'-0" STORAGE 001 DN P-01 P-01 P-01 P-01 P-02 P-02 P-02 W-03 W-03 W-03 W-02 W-01 W-02 W-02 9'-10 1/8" 21'-0" 6 54'-10 5/8" 10'-0" 79'-6 7/8" 4'-0 5/8" 6'-5 3/4" 2'-8 5/8" 3'-1 5/8" 3'-3" 6'-2" 3'-3" 3'-1 5/8" 10 1/4" 19'-1 1/2" 6" 22'-0" 6" 18'-10" 1'-2 1/4" 1'-6 1/2" 6'-10" 5'-4 5/8" (19 RISERS @ 7") (18 TREADS @ 11") (19 RISERS @ 7") (18 TREADS @ 11") 4'-6 7/8" 7 8 9 8 7 15 8" EXISTING BALCONY (NIC) EXISTING STAIRS (NIC) EXISTING STAIRS (NIC) 17 18 19 18 22 22 3 1/2" 23'-4 1/2" 23'-8" 29'-0" 18'-0 1/2" 33'-6 1/8" 11 5/8" 129'-10 1/8" 18'-0 1/2" 33'-6 1/8" 11 5/8" 2'-2 1/2" SHAFT 4'-7 3/8" SHAFT 4'-6 3/8" 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 F F A A B B C C D D E E 1 A3.02 1 A3.02 2 A3.01 2 A3.01 1 A3.01 1 A3.01 1.9 1.9 3.1 3.1 3.9 1.1 A.1 A.1 3 A3.01 3 A3.01 2 A3.02 2 A3.02 2 EXISTING BUILDING (NIC) EXISTING BUILDING (NIC) 1 OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW 2'-8" 1'-8" 3'-4" 1'-4" 3'-4" 1'-4" 3'-4" 1'-8" 3'-8" 10" 3'-4" 3'-4" 3'-4" 3'-4" 3'-4" 10" 3'-8" 1'-8" 3'-4" 1'-4" 3'-4" 1'-4" 3'-4" 1'-8" 2'-8" 63'-0" 1'-2 1/4" 19'-1 1/2" 6" 22'-0" 6" 18'-10" 10 1/4" 1'-3 3/8" 23'-4 1/2" 23'-8" 29'-0" 18'-0 1/2" 33'-6 1/8" 129'-10 1/8" 11 5/8" 56'-3 1/2" 6'-1 1/4" 3'-5 7/8" 16'-4 1/4" 7'-0 1/4" 1'-8" 16'-4 1/4" 7'-0 1/4" 23'-7 1/2" 9'-3 1/8" 32'-9 3/4" 5'-0 1/8" 33'-6 1/8" 1'-6 3/4" 9 1/2" 2 1/4" 18'-9 1/4" 6" 22'-0" 6" 18'-7 3/4" 4 1/4" 7 1/2" 79'-6 7/8" 62'-4 1/2" EL. = 113' - 2 3/4" EL. = 111' - 1" 19'-1" 7 3/8" 21'-10 5/8" 19'-5 3/8" EL. = 113' - 2 3/4" EL. = 111' - 1" 1'-6 1/2" 6'-10" 4'-7 7/8" 18'-0 1/2" 33'-6 1/8" 11 5/8" 54'-10 5/8" 2'-2 1/2" SHAFT 4'-7 3/8" 5'-7 3/8" 16'-6" 4'-6 7/8" 4'-3" SHAFT 4'-6 3/8" W-02 W-01 W-02 W-01 W-02 W-01 W-02 P-02 P-02 P-02 P-01 P-01 P-01 (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 13 13 14 EXISTING BALCONY (NIC) 16 16 16 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 Issued For SD: Plot Date Issued For DD: Issued For Permit: Issued For Construction: 10/31/14 10/31/2014 4:16:43 PM A1.21 FIRST & SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLANS 242 Linden - Galvanize 242 Linden Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 14-378 1/8" = 1'-0" A1.21 FIRST FLOOR 1 1/8" = 1'-0" A1.21 SECOND FLOOR 2 0' 4' 8' 16' 32' 0' 4' 8' 16' 32' FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: 1 1 ROOF LADDER WITH SAFTEY CAGE AND OVER ROOF RAIL EXTENTIONS - FABRICATED STEEL OR PREMANUFACTURED, 22'-0" +/- ACCESS HEIGHT, PROVIDE LOCKING SECURITY PANEL AT BASE, LADDER TO COMPLY WITH ALL JURSDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS, PAINT IF REQUIRED. 2 PROPOSED PLATFORM LIFT - GENISIS GARAVENTA GVL 168 SHAFT STYLE WITH 3" PIT WITH LEAD SCREW DRIVE SYSTEM. STANDARD PLATFORM SIZE WITH STRAIGHT THROUGH (180 DEG.) CONFIGURATION. DOORS AT FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL SHAFT BY OTHERS, PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY OPERATIONAL AND SECURITY INTERLOCKS PER MFR. VERIFY HOISTWAY DIMENSIONS, OPENING SIZES WITH MANUFACTURER. 3 BIKE WORK STATION - DEURO FIXIT. 4 BIKE RACKS - DEURO ULTRA SPACE SAVER, FLOOR STANDING SINGLE SIDED, 24 SPACES SHOWN. 5 8' CHAIN LINK FENCE ENCLOSURE WITH 3'-6" LOCKING GATE. 6 NEW 1:12 RAMP, CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE WITH RAIL. 7 CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PAN STAIR WITH PERFORATED METAL RISERS, CHANNEL STRINGERS, HANDRAIL AND GRUADRAIL. REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISHES. 8 EXISTING HOLLOW METAL DOOR, VERIFY CONDITION, PREPARE AND REPAINT DOOR AND FRAME INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR, REPLACE HARDWARE AS REQ'D BY TENANT. REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISH. 9 NEW DOOR AND HM FRAME, 3'-0" X 7'-0", REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISH. 10 CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PAN STAIR WITH PERFORATED METAL RISERS, CHANNEL STRINGERS, HANDRAIL AND GRUADRAIL. REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISHES. 11 STEEL FABRICATED RAILING DESIGN T.B.D., (CONTRACTOR TO CARRY ALLOWANCE OF $225 PER LINEAR FOOT TO INCLUDE GUARDRAILS, HANDRAILS AND ALL SUPPORTS AND FINISH) 12 PROPOSED NEW SECOND FLOOR SYSTEM - STEEL FRAMING WITH CONCRETE ON METAL DECK, REFER TO STRUCTURAL. 13 EXISTING SECOND FLOOR TO REMAIN (ROUGH SAWN 2X10 WOOD JOISTS WITH T&G DECKING), REPAIR FLOOR SHEATHING AND INSTALL GYP. CRETE TOPPING, RE: STRUCTURAL. 14 DEMO AND REMOVE EXISTING SECOND FLOOR (ROUGH SAWN 2X10 WOOD JOISTS WITH T&G DECKING) TO EXTENT OF NEW WORK, SALVAGE MATERIAL FOR POSSIBLE REUSE ELSWHERE, RE: STRUCTURAL. 15 PROVIDE NEW 5" REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE AT AREAS REMOVED FOR EXTENT OF NEW WORK - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, PROVIDE SAWCUT CONTROL JOINTS PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND AS INDICATED. (NOTE: CONDITION OF EXISTING SLAB ON GRADE IS UNKNOWN THEREFORE SCOPE OF NEW SLAB IS UNDETERMINED AT THE TIME OF THIS DRAWING ISSUE.) 16 DOUBLE HUNG MULLED WINDOW UNIT, APPROXIMATE SIZE OF EXISTING OPENING 5'-4" X 5'-4", EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOW, PREPARE EXISTING OPENING FOR INSTALLATION, GLAZING TYPE AND COLOR T.B.D. 17 INSWING BIFOLD ALUMINUM CLAD DOOR SYSTEM WITH ALUMINUM CLAD FIXED TRANSOM WINDOWS SYSTEM WITH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL STEEL REINFORCING MEMBERS (SIERRA PACIFIC OR EQUAL) WITH ADA SILL, 4 PANELS FOLDING TO THE LEFT AND 1 ENTRY PANEL ON THE RIGHT, COLOR AND GLAZING T.B.D. 18 COMMERCIAL ENTRY DOOR WITH MULLED ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOW SYSTEM WITH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL STEEL REINFORCING MEMBERS (SIERRA PACIFIC OR EQUAL) WITH ADA SILL, COLOR AND GLAZING T.B.D. 19 ALUMINUM CLAD FIXED DOOR PANEL TO MATCH ADJACENT BIFOLD DOOR WITH ALUMINUM CLAD TRANSOM WINDOWS SYSTEM WITH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL STEEL REINFORCING MEMBERS (SIERRA PACIFIC OR EQUAL), COLOR AND GLAZING T.B.D. 20 DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW UNIT, UNIT SIZE 3'-4" X 6'-0", EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOW (SIERRA PACIFIC OR EQUAL), GLAZING TYPE AND COLOR T.B.D. 21 DOUBLE HUNG MULLED WINDOW UNIT - INDIVIDUAL UNIT SIZE 3'-4" X 6'-0", EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOW (SIERRA PACIFIC OR EQUAL), GLAZING TYPE AND COLOR T.B.D. 22 EXTERIOR 3'-0" HIGH PATIO RAIL WITH GATE, FABRICATED STEEL WITH VERTICAL PICKETS AND TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL, VERTICAL POSTS WITH BASE PLATE, PAINT, (FINAL DESIGN T.B.D.). ARCHITECTURAL PARTITION TYPES Wall above Ceiling P-01 FURRED WALL AT EXISTING CMU EXTERIOR WALL - 3 5/8" 25 GA. METAL STUDS AT 16" O.C. FROM FLOOR TO STRUCTURE ABOVE WITH R-13 THERMAL INSULATION AND ONE LAYER OF 5/8" GYP. BD. ON EXPOSED SIDE, PROVIDE 1/2" GAP BETWEEN NEW FURRED WALL AND EXISTING CMU, REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISHES P-02 LIFT SHAFT WALL - 3 5/8" 20 GA. METAL STUDS AT 16" O.C. FROM FLOOR TO STRUCTURE ABOVE WITH R-13 THERMAL INSULATION AND ONE LAYER OF 5/8" GYP. BD. ON EXPOSED SIDE, PROVIDE 1/2" GAP BETWEEN NEW FURRED WALL AND EXISTING CMU, REFER TO INTERIORS FOR FINISHES ARCHITECTURAL WALL TYPES (E) W-01 MAIN WALL - 3 5/8" BRICK VENEER WITH 1 5/8" GAP ON CONTINUOUS CAVITY INSULATION (DOW CAVITY MATE R7.5 MIN. OR EQUAL) ON FLUID APPLIED AIR WEATHER BARRIER ON 5/8" GLASS MATT GYP. SHEATHING ON 6" METAL STUDS WITH R-13 THERMAL BATT INSULATION AND 5/8" TYPE X GYP. BD. INTERIOR, RE: STRUCTURAL W-02 PILASTER - 3 5/8" BRICK VENEER WITH 3 5/8" GAP ON CONTINUOUS CAVITY INSULATION (DOW CAVITY MATE R7.5 MIN. OR EQUAL) ON FLUID APPLIED AIR WEATHER BARRIER ON 5/8" GLASS MATT GYP. SHEATHING ON 6" METAL STUDS WITH R-13 THERMAL BATT INSULATION AND 5/8" TYPE X GYP. BD. INTERIOR, RE: STRUCTURAL W-03 8" X 8" X 16" CMU, PRECISION FACE, RE: STRUCTURAL FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES: EASMENT PROPERTY LINE EASMENT EASMENT EASMENT PROPERTY LINE WALL AND PARTITION TYPES: Revision Number Revision Date 3.c Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: 2014-10-31_Progress Drawings (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade) DOWN DISTRIBUTION PANEL DOOR DOWNSPOUT DRAWING EAST EACH EPOXY FLOORING EXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH SYSTEM EXPANSION JOINT ELEVATION ELECTRICAL EMERGENCY ENCLOSURE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL PANEL" ETHYLENE PROPYLENE DIENE MONOMER EQUAL EQUIPMENT ELECTRIC WATER COOLER ELECTRIC WATER HEATER EXHAUST EXISTING EXPANSION EXTERIOR FIRE ALARM FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL FLOOR DRAIN FOUNDATION FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED GRADE FIRE HOSE CABINET FINISH(ED) FIXTURE FLOW LINE FLASHING FLUORESCENT FACE OF FIREPROOF FIBER REINFORCED PANEL FLOOR SINK FOOT, FEET FOOTING FURNISH(ED) FURRING GAUGE, GAGE GALVANIZED GENERAL CONTRACTOR GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER GYPSUM HOSE BIBB HOLLOW CORE HARDWOOD HARDWARE HEIGHT HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE HOLLOW METAL HORIZONTAL HEAT, VENT, A/C HOT WATER INSIDE DIAMETER INCH INCANDESCENT INSULAT(ED)(ION) INTERIOR INVERT JUNCTION BOX JOINT KIP (1,000 POUNDS) KIP FEET LAMINATED LAVATORY POUND(S) LEAD COATED COPPER LINEAR FEET LEFT HAND LIVE LOAD LONG LEG HORIZONTAL LONG LEG VERTICAL LIGHTING PANEL LIGHT (ING) LIGHTWEIGHT MASONRY MAXIMUM MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL MECHANICAL MEDIUM MEMBRANE METAL MANUFACTURER MANHOLE MINIMUM MISCELLANEOUS MASONRY OPENING MOUNTED NORTH NOT IN CONTRACT NUMBER NOMINAL NOT TO SCALE A/C ACOUS ACT ADDN ADJ AFF AHU ALT ALUM ANCH ANG ANOD APPROX ARCH ASSOC BOT B&B B.O. BD BL BLK'G BM B.M. BRG BRK BSMT BUR CAB CD CEM CFM CG CI CJ CLG CLR CMU CO COL CONC CONN CONST CONT CPT CR CT CTR CU CUH CUSP CW DBL DET DF DIA DIM DISP DL DMH DN DP DR DS DWG E EA EF EIFS EJ EL ELEC EMERG ENCL ENGR EP EPDM EQ EQUIP EWC EWH EXH EXIST EXP EXT FA FACP FD FDN FE FEC FF FG FHC FIN FIXT FL FLASH FLUOR FO FP FRP FS FT FTG FURN FRR GA GALV GC GFI GYP HB HC HDWD HDWR HGT HID HM HORIZ HVAC HW ID IN INCAND INSUL INT INV JB JT K K-FT LAM LAV LB(S) LCC LF LH LL LLH LLV LP LT(G) LTWT MAS MAX MDP MECH MED MEMB MTL MFR MH MIN MISC MO MTD N NIC NO. NOM NTS ON CENTER(S) OUTSIDE DIAMETER OPEN ITEM OPENING OPPOSITE OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN OUNCE PROJECT ARCHITECT PATTERN POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT PERFORATED PLATE PLASTIC LAMINATE PLASTER PLUMBING POUNDS PER LINEAR FOOT PLYWOOD PANEL POLISH(ED) POWER PANEL PAIR PROJECT PARTITION POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH POINT PAINTED PLUMBING VENT POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PAVEMENT QUARRY TILE QUANTITY RADIUS RUBBER BASE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN ROOF DRAIN REFER RECEPTACLE REFERENCE REINFORCE (D) (ING) REQUIRED RESILIENT REVISIONS, REVISED ROOFING RIGHT HAND ROOM ROUGH OPENING RIGHT OF WAY RESTROOM ROOF TOP UNIT RAIN WATER LEADER ROOF VENT SOUTH SANITARY SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL TILE SOLID CORE SCHEDULE STORM DRAIN SECTION SERVICE SQUARE FEET SHEET SIMILAR SANITARY MANHOLE SPRAY ON VINYL SPECIFICATIONS SQUARE SOLID SURFACE STAINLESS STEEL STANDARD STEEL STORAGE STRUCTURAL SUSPENDED SYMMETRICAL SYSTEM TREAD TOP OF TONGUE AND GROOVE TELEPHONE TEMPERATURE, TEMPERED THICK THRESHOLD THE NEENAN COMPANY TOILET PARTITION TRANSFORMER TRANSITION STRIP TYPICAL TELEVISION UNDERGROUND UNIT HEATER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE UNFINISHED ULTRA VIOLET VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VERTICAL VENTILATOR VERIFY IN FIELD VINYL WALL COVERING WEST WITH WITHOUT WATER CLOSET WOOD WATER HEATER WATERPROOF WORK POINT WATER RESISTANT WAINSCOT WEIGHT WATER VALVE WELDED WIRE FABRIC YARD ZONE VALUE BOX OC OD OI OPG OPP ORD OZ PA PAT PCF PERF PL PLAM PLAS PLBG PLF PLYWD PNL POL PP PR PROJ PRTN PSF PSI PT PTD PV PVC PVMT QT QTY R RB RCP RD RE RECPT REF REINF REQ RESIL REV RFG RH RM RO ROW RR RTU RWL RV S SAN S.A.T. SC SCHED SD SECT SERV SF SHT SIM SMH SOV SPEC SQ SS SSTL STD STL STOR STRUCT SUSP SYM SYST TR T.O. T&G TEL TEMP THK THRES TNC TP TRANS TS TYP TV UG UH UNO UNFIN UV VCT VERT VENT VIF VWC W W/ W/O WC WD WH WP WPT WR WSCT WT WV WWF YD ZVB OWNER DEVELOPER: ? ? ? TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: CONTACT: GENERAL CONTRACTOR: ? ? ? TEL: ? FAX: E-MAIL: CONTACT: ARCHITECT: ? ? ? TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: CONTACT: STRUCTURAL DESIGN: ? ? ? TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: CONTACT: MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING DESIGN/BUILD: ? ? ? TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: CONTACT: ELECTRICAL DESIGN/BUILD: ? ? ? TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: CONTACT: FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN/BUILD: ? ? ? TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: CONTACT: PROJECT TEAM ABBREVIATIONS INTERIOR ELEVATION DETAIL DOOR NUMBER WINDOW NUMBER WALL & PARTITION TYPE NEW COLUMN GRID REVISION ROOM NAME & NUMBER 1 4 2 3 I2.11 TYPE RATING GRAPHIC SYMBOLS A2.11 BUILDING ELEVATION EQUIPMENT TAG INTERIOR DESIGN: ? ? ? TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: CONTACT: A1.01 1 SIM Room 101 A A 1 101A W-01 -- 1 CPT-1 RB-1 FLOORING 1 ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTE 1 A EXISTING COLUMN GRID DRAWING INDEX Issued For SD: Plot Date Issued For DD: Issued For Permit: Issued For Construction: 10/31/14 10/31/2014 4:16:42 PM A0.01 ARCHITECTURAL COVER SHEET 242 Linden - Galvanize 242 Linden Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 14-378 242 Linden - Galvanize 242 Linden Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 ARCHITECTURAL A0.01 ARCHITECTURAL COVER SHEET CIVIL CX.XX Unnamed LANDSCAPE LX.XX Unnamed IRRIGATION IRX.XX Unnamed ARCHITECTURAL A1.21 FIRST & SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A1.31 ROOF PLAN A2.11 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.12 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A3.01 BUILDING SECTIONS A3.02 BUILDING SECTIONS INTERIORS IX.XX Unnamed STRUCTURAL SX.XX Unnamed Revision Number Revision Date 3.c Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: 2014-10-31_Progress Drawings (2615 : 242 Linden Street - Final Design Review; Proposed New Facade)